10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

R QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended April 29, 2012

OR

£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-34428

Avago Technologies Limited

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Singapore (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	98-0682363 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1 Yishun Avenue 7 Singapore 768923	N/A
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(65) 6755-7888

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES R NO £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES R NO £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer R	Accelerated filer £	Non-accelerated filer £	Smaller reporting company £
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES £ NO R

As of May 25, 2012 there were 244,802,147 shares of our ordinary shares, no par value per share, outstanding.

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended April 29, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Unaudited	3
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	26
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	28
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	28
Item 1A. Risk Factors	28
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	47
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	47
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	47
Item 5. Other Information	47
Item 6. Exhibits	47
SIGNATURES	50
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — Unaudited

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS — UNAUDITED

(in millions, except share amounts)

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011 (1)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	954	$	829
Trade accounts receivable, net	274		328
Inventory	218		194
Other current assets	62		42
Total current assets	1,508		1,393
Property, plant and equipment, net	402		316
Goodwill	177		177
Intangible assets, net	461		499
Other long-term assets	63		61
Total assets	$	2,611	$	2,446
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	257	$	221
Employee compensation and benefits	57		89
Capital lease obligations — current	1		2
Other current liabilities	41		38
Total current liabilities	356		350
Long-term liabilities:
Capital lease obligations — non-current	3		4
Other long-term liabilities	85		86
Total liabilities	444		440
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Shareholders’ equity:
Ordinary shares, no par value; 244,726,290 shares and 245,962,320 shares issued and outstanding on April 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011, respectively	1,442		1,479
Retained earnings	723		525
Accumulated other comprehensive income	2		2
Total shareholders’ equity	2,167		2,006
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,611	$	2,446

__________________________________

(1) Amounts as of October 30, 2011 have been derived from audited financial statements as of that date.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS — UNAUDITED

(in millions, except per share data)

	Fiscal Quarter Ended					Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011			April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011
Net revenue	$	577	$	560		$	1,140		$	1,110
Cost of products sold:
Cost of products sold	284		271			563			536
Amortization of intangible assets	14		14			28			28
Restructuring charges	1		—			1			—
Total cost of products sold	299		285			592			564
Gross margin	278		275			548			546
Research and development	84		76			166			149
Selling, general and administrative	51		55			101			105
Amortization of intangible assets	5		5			10			11
Restructuring charges	1		1			2			1
Total operating expenses	141		137			279			266
Income from operations	137		138			269			280
Interest expense	—		(1		)	(1		)	(4		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—		(1		)	—			(20		)
Other income, net	3		1			2			1
Income before income taxes	140		137			270			257
Provision for income taxes	6		2			11			3
Net income	$	134	$	135		$	259		$	254
Net income per share:
Basic:
Net income per share	$	0.55	$	0.55		$	1.05		$	1.04
Diluted:
Net income per share	$	0.54	$	0.54		$	1.03		$	1.01
Weighted average shares :
Basic	244		245			246			245
Diluted	250		252			251			252
Dividends declared and paid per share	$	0.13	$	0.08		$	0.25		$	0.15

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — UNAUDITED

(in millions)

	Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	259		$	254
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	75			79
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			6
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment	1			1
Impairment of investment and loan receivable from investee	2			—
Share-based compensation	24			16
Tax benefits from share-based compensation	2			8
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation	(1		)	(2		)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisition:
Trade accounts receivable, net	54			(3		)
Inventory	(24		)	(5		)
Accounts payable	13			15
Employee compensation and benefits	(32		)	(20		)
Other current assets and current liabilities	(18		)	(30		)
Other long-term assets and long-term liabilities	(5		)	1
Net cash provided by operating activities	350			320
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment	(103		)	(51		)
Acquisition and investment, net of cash acquired	—			(9		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(103		)	(60		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from government grants	2			—
Debt repayments	—			(230		)
Debt financing costs	—			(2		)
Payments on capital lease obligations	(1		)	(2		)
Issuance of ordinary shares	22			44
Repurchase of ordinary shares	(85		)	—
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation	1			2
Dividend payments to shareholders	(61		)	(37		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(122		)	(225		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	125			35
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period	829			561
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	954		$	596

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Overview, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Overview

Avago Technologies Limited, or the “Company”, was organized under the laws of the Republic of Singapore in August 2005. We are the successor to the Semiconductor Products Group, or SPG, of Agilent Technologies, Inc., or Agilent. On December 1, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the assets of SPG from Agilent for $2.7 billion, or the SPG Acquisition.

We are a designer, developer and global supplier of analog semiconductor devices with a focus on III-V based products. We offer products in four primary target markets: wireless communications, wired infrastructure, industrial and automotive electronics, and consumer and computing peripherals. Applications for our products in these target markets include cellular phones, consumer appliances, data networking and telecommunications equipment, enterprise storage and servers, factory automation, displays, optical mice and printers.

References herein to “we”, “our”, “us” and “Avago” are to Avago Technologies Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires.

Basis of Presentation

Fiscal Periods. We operate on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to October 31. Our first quarter of fiscal year 2012 ended on January 29, 2012, the second quarter ended on April 29, 2012, the third quarter will end on July 29, 2012 and the fourth quarter will end on October 28, 2012.

Information. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Avago and all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Interim information presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements has been prepared by management and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are necessary for the fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown, and is in accordance with GAAP. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011, or fiscal year 2011, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on December 16, 2011.

The operating results for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending October 28, 2012, or fiscal year 2012, or for any other future period. The balance sheet data as of October 30, 2011 presented is derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.

Significant Accounting Policies

Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could affect the results of operations reported in future periods.

Concentrations of credit risk and significant customers. Our cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable are potentially subject to concentration of credit risk. Cash and cash equivalents may be redeemable upon demand and are maintained with several financial institutions that management believes are of high credit quality and therefore bear minimal credit risk. The Company seeks to mitigate its credit risks by spreading such risks across multiple counterparties and monitoring the risk profile of these counterparties. Our accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located in the U.S. and internationally. Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is generally diversified due to the large number of entities comprising our customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographies. We perform regular credit evaluations of our customers’ financial conditions, and requiring collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances.

We sell our products through our direct sales force, manufacturers' representatives and distributors. Two customers accounted for 17% and 11%, respectively, of our net accounts receivable balance at April 29, 2012 and these same two customers accounted for 15% and 10%, respectively, of our net accounts receivable balance at October 30, 2011. For the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, one customer represented 16% and 17% of net revenue, respectively. For the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, no single customer represented 10% or more of net revenue.

Warranty.  We accrue for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. Product warranty costs are estimated based upon our historical experience and specific identification of product requirements, which may fluctuate based on product mix. Additionally, we accrue for warranty costs associated with occasional or unanticipated product

6

quality issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated.

The following table summarizes the changes in accrued warranty (in millions):

Balance as of October 30, 2011 — included in other current liabilities	$	6
Adjustment to estimate — released to cost of products sold	(3		)
Balance as of April 29, 2012 — included in other current liabilities	$	3

See Note 11. “Commitments and Contingencies” for further details.

Net income per share. Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of ordinary shares and potentially dilutive share equivalents outstanding during the period. Diluted shares outstanding includes the dilutive effect of in-the-money options, restricted share units, or RSUs, and employee share purchase rights under the Avago Technologies Limited Employee Share Purchase Plan, or ESPP. The dilutive effect of such equity awards is calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options and to purchase shares under the ESPP, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when equity awards become deductible for income tax purposes are collectively assumed to be used to repurchase shares.

Diluted net income per share for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 excluded the potentially dilutive effect of weighted-average outstanding equity awards, including options, RSUs, and ESPP rights, to purchase 1 million, 1 million, 1 million, and less than 1 million ordinary shares, respectively, as their effect was antidilutive.

The following is a reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share computations for the periods presented (in millions, except per share data):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Net income (Numerator):
Net income	$	134	$	135	$	259	$	254
Shares (Denominator):
Basic weighted average ordinary shares outstanding	244		245		246		245
Add: Incremental shares for:
Dilutive effect of share options, RSUs and ESPP rights	6		7		5		7
Shares used in diluted computation	250		252		251		252
Net income per share:
Basic:
Net income per share	$	0.55	$	0.55	$	1.05	$	1.04
Diluted:
Net income per share	$	0.54	$	0.54	$	1.03	$	1.01

Supplemental cash flow disclosures. At April 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011, we had $41 million and $21 million, respectively, of unpaid purchases of property, plant, and equipment included in accounts payable and other current liabilities. Amounts reported as unpaid purchases are recorded as cash outflows from investing activities for purchases of property, plant, and equipment in the consolidated statement of cash flows in the period they are paid.

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 reflects a reclassification of $2 million of expenses related to our credit agreement entered into in March 2011 from cash flows provided by operating activities to cash flows used in financing activities. As a result, net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in financing activities for this period each increased by a corresponding amount. These reclassifications have no impact on previously reported net cash activities.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, we adopted the updated guidance issued by Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, related to fair value measurements and disclosures, which requires separate disclosures about purchases, sales,

7

issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 fair value measurements (see Note 6. “Fair Value” for further discussion of fair value measurements). Because this new standard is related primarily to the disclosures required in our financial statements, its adoption has not had a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, we adopted the updated guidance issued by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board on fair value measurement and related disclosure requirements, which changes some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The adoption of this guidance did not have any significant impact on our results of operations and financial position and disclosures in our financial statements.

Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted

In September 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance on multi-employer pension plans. This guidance is intended to provide more information about an employer's financial obligations to a multi-employer pension plan and, therefore, help financial statement users better understand the financial health of all of the significant plans in which the employer participates. The updated guidance does not change the current recognition and measurement guidance for an employer's participation in a multi-employer plan. This guidance will be effective for our fiscal year 2012, with early adoption permitted. Other than requiring additional disclosures in our financial statements, we believe the adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In August 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update on goodwill impairment testing. This guidance is

intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the goodwill impairment test by providing entities an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The new guidance will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year ending November 3, 2013, or fiscal year 2013, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect this new guidance to have a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance is intended to enhance comparability between entities that report under GAAP and those that report under International Financial Reporting Standards and to provide a more consistent method of presenting non-owner transactions that affect an entity’s equity. In accordance with the new guidance, an entity has the option to present total comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements and eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The requirement to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the face of the consolidated statement of income has been deferred by an update issued by the FASB in December 2011. This new guidance should be applied retrospectively and will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year 2013, with early adoption permitted. Other than its impact on the presentation of other comprehensive income, we believe the adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

2. Inventory

Inventory consists of the following (in millions):

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
Finished goods	$	53	$	48
Work-in-process	106		106
Raw materials	59		40
Total inventory	$	218	$	194

3. Acquisition

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, we acquired a U.S.-based company engaged in the manufacturing of integrated circuits for approximately $8 million in cash. The purchase price was allocated to the acquired net assets based on estimates of fair values as follows: net assets of $8 million, including intangible assets of $4 million and goodwill of $5 million. The intangible assets are being amortized over their useful lives ranging from 5 to 15 years. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the acquired business commencing as of the acquisition date. Pro forma results of operations for the acquisition have not been presented because the effects of the acquisition were not material to our prior financial statements.

8

4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

There were no changes to goodwill during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012.

Intangible Assets

Amortizable purchased intangibles consist of the following (in millions):

	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value
As of April 29, 2012:
Purchased technology	$	728	$	(374	)	$	354
Customer and distributor relationships	257		(152		)	105
Other	4		(2		)	2
Total	$	989	$	(528	)	$	461
As of October 30, 2011:
Purchased technology	$	728	$	(346	)	$	382
Customer and distributor relationships	257		(142		)	115
Other	4		(2		)	2
Total	$	989	$	(490	)	$	499

The following table presents the amortization of purchased intangible assets (in millions):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Cost of products sold	$	14	$	14	$	28	$	28
Operating expenses	5		5		10		11
Total	$	19	$	19	$	38	$	39

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, we recorded $4 million in intangible assets with a weighted-average amortization period of 14 years in conjunction with an acquisition. See Note 3. “Acquisition.”

Based on the amount of intangible assets subject to amortization at April 29, 2012, the expected amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows (in millions):

Fiscal Year	Amount
2012 (remainder)	$	39
2013	77
2014	77
2015	76
2016	59
2017	49
Thereafter	84
	$	461

The weighted-average amortization periods remaining by intangible asset category as at April 29, 2012 were as follows (in years):

Amortizable intangible assets:
Purchased technology	8
Customer and distributor relationships	7
Other	22

9

5. Borrowings

Debt Repayments

During the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, we redeemed the remaining $230 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 11 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due December 1, 2015, or senior subordinated notes. We redeemed the senior subordinated notes at a 5.938% premium of the principal amount plus accrued interest, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $19 million, which consisted of a $14 million premium and a $5 million write-off of debt issuance costs and other related expenses.

Revolving Credit Facility

As of April 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility and were in compliance with the financial covenants under our credit agreement.

6. Fair Value

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three level hierarchy is applied to prioritize the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under the guidance for fair value measurements are described below:

Level 1—Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Our Level 1 assets include time deposits, bank acceptances, investment funds—deferred compensation plan assets and available-for-sale securities investments. We measure investment funds and available-for-sale securities investments at quoted market price as they are traded in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions. Time deposits are highly liquid with maturities of ninety days or less. Bank acceptances are highly liquid with maturities of one hundred and eighty days or less. Due to their short-term maturities, we have determined that the fair value of time deposits and bank acceptances should be their face value.

Level 2—Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. We did not have any Level 2 asset or liability activities during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012.

Level 3—Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Level 3 assets and liabilities include cost method investments, goodwill, amortizable intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment, which are measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow approach when they are impaired. Quantitative information for Level 3 assets and liabilities reviewed at each reporting period, includes indicators of significant deterioration in the earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality, business prospects of the investee, and financial indicators of the investee's ability to continue as a going concern.

We record at cost non-marketable investments where we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence or control and periodically review them for impairment. During fiscal year 2011, we made an investment of $1 million in the common stock of a privately-held non-U.S. company. This equity investment is accounted for under the cost method and is included on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet in other long-term assets. In fiscal year 2011, we also entered into a secured loan and warrant purchase agreement with this company, pursuant to which we provided them with a secured loan of $1 million, at an annual interest rate of 8%, for a term of one year. Based on the quantitative assessment of the financial condition and business prospects of the investee, this equity investment and loan were both determined to be impaired during the fiscal quarter ended January 29, 2012.

We did not have any Level 3 asset or liability activities other than those noted above during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012.

10

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below sets forth by level our financial assets that were accounted for at fair value as of April 29, 2012. The table does not include cash on hand and also does not include assets that are measured at historical cost or any basis other than fair value (in millions).

	Portion of Carrying Value Measured at Fair Value as of April 29, 2012		Fair Value Measurement as of April 29, 2012 Using Quoted Prices In Active Market For Identical Assets (Level 1)
Assets:
Time deposits (1)	$	612	$	612
Investment Funds — Deferred Compensation Plan Assets (2)	7		7
Bank acceptances (2)	1		1
Available-for-sale securities (3)	4		4
Total assets measured at fair value	$	624	$	624
Liabilities:
Deferred Compensation Plan Liabilities (4)	$	7	$	7

_________________________________

(1) Included in cash and cash equivalents in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

(2) Included in other current assets in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

(3) Included in other long-term assets in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

(4) Included in other current liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

During the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012, there were no material transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 fair value instruments.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

There were no non-financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value as of April 29, 2012.

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, to the extent the underlying liability will be settled in cash, approximate carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

7. Shareholders’ Equity

Share Repurchase Program

On June 8, 2011, the Company's board of directors, or the Board, authorized the Company to repurchase up to 15 million of our outstanding ordinary shares, not to exceed $500 million in aggregate, or the 2011 share repurchase program. Under the 2011 share repurchase program, the Company repurchased and cancelled 0.2 million and 2.8 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $6 million and $85 million in cash, during the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively. The weighted-average purchase prices per share for shares repurchased were $34.41 and $30.50 for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively. All repurchased shares were immediately retired. The 2011 share repurchase program expired at the Company's 2012 annual general meeting on April 4, 2012.

On April 4, 2012, our Board of Directors has authorized the Company to repurchase up to 15 million of its ordinary shares, or the 2012 share repurchase program, pursuant to the shareholder approval of the Company's 2012 share purchase mandate received at the Company's 2012 Annual General Meeting on April 4, 2012, or the 2012 share purchase mandate. Pursuant to the 2012 share purchase mandate, the Company is authorized, upon Board approval, to repurchase up to approximately 24.6 million of its ordinary shares in open market transactions or pursuant to equal access schemes, prior to the date on which the 2013 Annual General Meeting of the Company is held or required by law to be held. However, the Company may not repurchase more than 15 million ordinary shares without further action by the Board. The 2012 share repurchase program, will expire at the Company's 2013 Annual General Meeting, unless earlier terminated. Share repurchases will be made in the open market at such times and in such amounts as the Company deems appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, market conditions and applicable legal requirements. The 2012 share repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares and may be suspended or

11

terminated at any time without prior notice. All repurchased shares are immediately retired. As of April 29, 2012, no shares had been purchased under the 2012 share repurchase program.

Dividends

We paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 and $0.08 per share, or $32 million and $20 million in total during the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively. We have paid aggregate dividends of $61 million and $37 million during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively.

Share-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense related to share-based awards granted to employees, directors, and non-employees for the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 (in millions):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Cost of products sold	$	2	$	1	$	3	$	2
Research and development	5		3		9		6
Selling, general and administrative	6		5		12		8
Total share-based compensation expense	$	13	$	9	$	24	$	16

The weighted-average assumptions utilized for our Black-Scholes valuation model for options and ESPP rights granted during the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 are as follows:

	Options
	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Risk-free interest rate	0.8	%	2.2	%	0.8	%	2.2	%
Dividend yield	1.4	%	0.9	%	1.4	%	0.9	%
Volatility	53.0	%	44.0	%	54.0	%	44.0	%
Expected term (in years)	5.0		5.0		5.0		5.0

	ESPP
	Fiscal QuarterEnded				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Risk-free interest rate	0.2	%	0.2	%	0.1	%	0.2	%
Dividend yield	1.4	%	0.4	%	1.3	%	0.2	%
Volatility	52.0	%	40.0	%	52.0	%	41.0	%
Expected term (in years)	0.5		0.5		0.5		0.5

The dividend yield for the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 are based on the dividend yield as of the respective option grant dates. Expected volatility is based on the combination of historical volatility of guideline publicly-traded companies over the period commensurate with the expected life of the options and the implied volatility of guideline publicly-traded companies from traded options with a term of 180 days or greater measured over the last three months. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the average U.S. Treasury Strips rate during the period, which approximates the rate in effect at the time of grant. Our computation of expected term was based on data, such as the data of peer companies and company-specific attributes that we believe could affect employees’ exercise behavior.

Based on the above assumptions, the weighted-average fair values of the options granted under the Company's equity incentive award plans for the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 were $14.46 and $12.30, respectively, and $14.55 and $12.21 for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively. The weighted-average fair values of the rights to purchase shares in the ESPP for the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 were $12.94 and $7.86, respectively, and $12.84 and $7.03 for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of RSUs granted in the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 was $35.49. No RSUs were granted in the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011. The weighted-average fair values of RSUs granted in the two fiscal quarters ended

12

April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 were $35.22 and $32.39, respectively.    

Total compensation cost related to unvested options as of April 29, 2012 was $132 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average service period of 3 years. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to the ESPP as of April 29, 2012 was $1 million, and is expected to be recognized over the remaining portion of the current offering period under the ESPP, which ends on September 14, 2012. Total compensation cost related to unvested RSUs as of April 29, 2012 was $21 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average service period of 3 years.

Equity Incentive Award Plans

A summary of option award activity related to our equity incentive plans is as follows (in millions, except years and per share amounts):

			Option Awards Outstanding
	Shares Available for Grant		Number Outstanding		Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance as of October 30, 2011	10		19		$	17.93
Annual increase in shares available for
issuance, per equity incentive plan terms	6		—		—
Granted	(4	)	4		35.13
Exercised	—		(1	)	12.79
Cancelled	1		(1	)	20.80
Balance as of April 29, 2012	13		21		21.47		6.53	$	278
Vested as of April 29, 2012			6		13.11		5.87	127
Vested and expected to vest as of
April 29, 2012			19		20.87		6.50	267

The following table summarizes the ranges of outstanding and exercisable option awards as of April 29, 2012 (in millions, except years and per share amounts):

	Option Awards Outstanding				Option Awards Exercisable
Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share		Number Exercisable	Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
$0.00-5.00	2	3.76	$	4.99	1	$	4.98
5.01-10.00	2	6.64	9.26		1	9.17
10.01-15.00	5	6.20	12.10		2	11.19
15.01-20.00	1	7.58	17.54		—	17.72
20.01-25.00	3	8.25	20.53		1	20.54
25.01-30.00	—	6.81	29.21		—	28.52
30.01-35.00	4	5.99	32.74		1	32.34
35.01-40.00	4	6.80	35.48		—	—
Total	21	6.53	21.47		6	13.11

RSU activity and the number of outstanding RSUs were not material for either of the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011.

Employee Share Purchase Plan

The ESPP consists of successive six-month offering periods and permits eligible employees to purchase ordinary shares through payroll deductions, at the end of each offering period, at a price equal to the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the ordinary shares at either the beginning or ending of the relevant offering period. Deductions may not exceed 10% of an employee's base compensation and an employee may not purchase more than $25,000 worth of shares in any calendar year or offering period, or more than 2,500 shares on any purchase date. A total of 0.1 million and 0.2 million shares were purchased under the ESPP for aggregate consideration of $4 million and $3 million during the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively. No shares related to ESPP were issued during the fiscal quarters ended January 29, 2012 and

13

January 30, 2011. The purchase dates under the ESPP are scheduled to occur in March and September of each year, which fall in our second and fourth fiscal quarters, respectively. As at April 29, 2012, 7.6 million shares remained available for issuance under the ESPP.

8. Income Taxes

For the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, we recorded an income tax provision of $6 million and $11 million, respectively, compared to $2 million and $3 million for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, respectively. The income tax provision for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 included the recognition of a $3 million tax benefit as a result of U.S. legislation enacted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 retroactively reinstating the research and development tax credit.

9. Segment Information

ASC 280 “Segment Reporting,” or ASC 280, establishes standards for the way public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual consolidated financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. ASC 280 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. We have concluded that we have one reportable segment based on the following factors: sales of semiconductors represents our only material source of revenue; substantially all products offered incorporate analog functionality and are manufactured under similar manufacturing processes; we use an integrated approach in developing our products in that discrete technologies developed are frequently integrated across many of our products; and we use a common order fulfillment process and similar distribution approach for our products. Broad distributor networks are typically used to distribute our products, with large accounts being serviced by a direct sales force. The Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker as defined by ASC 280.

10. Related Party Transactions

eSilicon Corporation

Mr. John T. Dickson, who became a director of the Company on January 18, 2012, also serves as a director of eSilicon Corporation. In the ordinary course of business, on an arm’s length basis, we sell certain of our products to and purchase certain intellectual properties, design services and maintenance services from eSilicon Corporation.

KLA-Tencor Corporation

Mr. John T. Dickson, also serves as a director of KLA-Tencor Corporation., or KLA-Tencor. In the ordinary course of business, on an arm’s length basis, we purchase certain materials, equipment, and tools from KLA-Tencor.

Wistron Corporation

Mr. John Min-Chih Hsuan, a director of the Company, is also a director of Wistron Corporation, one of our customers. In the ordinary course of business, on an arm’s length basis, we sell certain of our products to Wistron Corporation.

WIN Semiconductor Corp.

Mr. John Min-Chih Hsuan, a director of the Company, was previously a director at WIN Semiconductor Corp., one of our third-party contract manufacturer with whom we do business in the ordinary course, on an arm’s length basis. Mr. Hsuan resigned as a director of WIN Semiconductor Corp. in June 2011.

Flextronics International Ltd.

Mr. James A. Davidson, a director of the Company until March 9, 2011, also serves as a director of Flextronics International Ltd., or Flextronics. In the ordinary course of business, on an arm’s length basis, we sell certain of our products to Flextronics.

14

Transactions and balances with our related parties were as follows (in millions):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended					Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011
Net revenue:
Flextronics1	$	—		$	40	$	—		$	68
Wistron Corporation2	2			1		4			1
eSilicon Corporation3	1			—		1			—
Total costs and expenses:
WIN Semiconductor Corp.4	—			20		—			20
KLA-Tencor5	1			—		2			—
eSilicon Corporation3	—		*	—		—		*	—

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
Receivables:
Wistron Corporation2	$	1	$	1
eSilicon Corporation3	1		—

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
Payables:
KLA-Tencor5	$	1	$	—

_________________________________

* Represent amounts less than $0.5 million.

¹ Amounts represent net revenue transactions with Flextronics through the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011. Flextronics ceased to be a related party after the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.

² Amount for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 represents net revenue transactions for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011 only. Wistron Corporation became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.

³ Amounts represent net revenue and purchase transactions with eSilicon Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 and accounts receivable balance as of April 29, 2012. eSilicon Corporation became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2012.

⁴ Amounts represent transactions with WIN Semiconductor Corp. included in cost of products sold incurred during the period WIN Semiconductor Corp was a related party. WIN Semiconductor Corp. became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 and ceased being a related party during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011.

⁵Amounts represent purchase transactions with KLA-Tencor for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and accounts payable balance as of April 29, 2012. KLA-Tencor became a related party during the first quarter of fiscal year 2012.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

     The following table sets forth changes in our commitments as of April 29, 2012 for the fiscal periods noted (in millions).

	Total		2012 (remainder)		2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter
Purchase commitments	$	75	$	75	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Other Contractual Commitments	49		7		18		12		7		5		—		—

Purchase Commitments.  We have unconditional purchase obligations which include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum

15

quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty.

Other Contractual Commitments.  Represents amounts payable pursuant to agreements related to outsourced IT, human resources, financial infrastructure outsourcing services and other services agreements.

There were no other substantial changes to our contractual commitments during the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012 from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2011.

Contingencies

From time to time, we are involved in litigation that we believe is of the type common to companies engaged in our line of business, including commercial disputes and employment issues. As of the date of this filing, we are not involved in any pending legal proceedings that we believe would likely have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, from time to time certain disputes involve claims by third parties that our activities infringe their patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property rights. These claims generally involve the demand by a third-party that we cease the manufacture, use or sale of the allegedly infringing products, processes or technologies and/or pay substantial damages or royalties for past, present and future use of the allegedly infringing intellectual property. For example, on July 23, 2009, TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc., or TriQuint, filed a complaint against us and certain of our subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court, District of Arizona seeking declaratory judgment that four of our patents relating to RF filter technology used in our wireless products are invalid and, if valid, that TriQuint’s products do not infringe any of those patents. TriQuint withdrew those claims with respect to three of those four patents. In addition, TriQuint claimed that certain of our wireless products infringe three of its patents. We filed our answer and initial counterclaim on September 17, 2009, denying infringement, asserting the invalidity of TriQuint’s patents and asserting infringement by TriQuint of ten Avago patents, and filed additional counterclaims on March 25, 2010 for the misappropriation of Avago trade secrets. On October 16, 2009, TriQuint filed its answer to our initial counterclaim, denying infringement and filed an antitrust counterclaim and counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non infringement and invalidity. The court dismissed TriQuint’s antitrust counterclaims on procedural grounds on March 16, 2010, but on August 3, 2010 granted TriQuint's motion to file an amended pleading for its anti-trust claims. Effective May 12, 2012, we entered into a confidential settlement and patent cross-license agreement with TriQuint that resolved these outstanding actions. There was no impact to our financial position or results of operations as of April 29, 2012 as a result of the confidential settlement.

With respect to our legal proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, we have not yet been able to determine whether an unfavorable outcome is probable or reasonably possible and have not been able to reasonably estimate the amount or range of any possible loss. As a result, no amounts have been accrued or disclosed in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these legal proceedings.

Claims that our products or processes infringe or misappropriate any third-party intellectual property rights (including claims arising through our contractual indemnification of our customers) often involve highly complex, technical issues, the outcome of which is inherently uncertain. Moreover, from time to time we pursue litigation to assert our intellectual property rights. Regardless of the merit or resolution of any such litigation, complex intellectual property litigation is generally costly and diverts the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel.

Warranty

Commencing in fiscal year 2008, we notified certain customers of a product quality issue and began taking additional steps to correct the quality issue and work with affected customers to determine potential costs covered by our warranty obligations. We maintain insurance coverage for product liability and have been working with our insurance carriers to determine the extent of covered losses in this situation. Based on settlements with customers and the status of discussions with other affected customers and discussions with our insurance carriers, we recorded a charge of $2 million during fiscal year 2009 to cover costs relating to this quality issue in excess of expected insurance coverage. During the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012, we reached a final settlement agreement with a customer on this product quality issue. However, the final settlement amount was fully recovered from our insurance carrier in the same period. Therefore, during the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012, we released the $2 million warranty charge, resulting in a $2 million decrease of warranty accrual and cost of goods sold for this product warranty issue.

Indemnifications to Hewlett-Packard and Agilent

Agilent has given multiple indemnities to Hewlett-Packard Company in connection with its activities prior to its spin-off from Hewlett-Packard Company in June 1999 for the businesses that constituted Agilent prior to the spin-off. As the successor to the SPG business of Agilent, we have acquired responsibility for indemnifications related to assigned intellectual property agreements. Additionally, when we completed the acquisition of SPG from Agilent in December 2005, we provided indemnities to Agilent with regard to Agilent’s conduct of the SPG business prior to the SPG acquisition. In our opinion, the fair value of these indemnifications is not material and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial

16

statements with respect to these indemnification obligations.

Other Indemnifications

As is customary in our industry and as provided for in local law in the United States and other jurisdictions, many of our standard contracts provide remedies to our customers and others with whom we enter into contracts, such as defense, settlement, or payment of judgment for intellectual property claims related to the use of our products. From time to time, we indemnify customers, as well as our suppliers, contractors, lessors, lessees, companies that purchase our businesses or assets and others with whom we enter into contracts, against combinations of loss, expense, or liability arising from various triggering events related to the sale and the use of our products, the use of their goods and services, the use of facilities and state of our owned facilities, the state of the assets and businesses that we sell and other matters covered by such contracts, usually up to a specified maximum amount. In addition, from time to time we also provide protection to these parties against claims related to undiscovered liabilities, additional product liability or environmental obligations. In our experience, claims made under such indemnifications are rare and the associated estimated fair value of the liability is not material.

12. Subsequent Events

In May 2012, we entered into a confidential settlement and patent cross-licensing agreement with TriQuint to resolve all outstanding litigation between the parties. There was no impact to our financial position or results of operations as of April 29, 2012 as a result of the confidential settlement.

On June 6, 2012, the Board declared an interim cash dividend on the Company’s ordinary shares of $0.15 per share, payable on June 29, 2012 to shareholders of record at the close of business (5:00 p.m.), Eastern Time, on June 18, 2012.

17

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qand the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011, or fiscal year 2011, included in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor fiscal year 2011, or 2011 Annual Report onForm 10-K. References to “Avago” “we”, “our” and “us” are to Avago Technologies Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires. This Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qmay contain predictions, estimates and other forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which are made under the safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements may include projections of financial information; statements about historical results that may suggest trends for our business; statements of the plans, strategies, and objectives of management for future operations; statements of expectation or belief regarding future events, technology developments, our products, product sales, expenses, liquidity, cash flow and growth rates, or enforceability of our intellectual property rights; the effects of seasonality on our results of operations. Such statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections of future Avago or industry performance and macroeconomic conditions, based on management’s judgment, beliefs, current trends and market conditions, and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. We derive most of our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and forecasts, which are based upon many detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and, of course, it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. Accordingly, we caution you not to place undue reliance on these statements. For example, there can be no assurance that our product sales efforts, revenues or expenses will meet any expectations or follow any trend(s), or that our ability to compete effectively will be successful or yield anticipated results. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are disclosed under “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q, and in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. All of the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors listed above and those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” below. We undertake no intent or obligation to publicly update or revise any of these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

We are a leading designer, developer and global supplier of a broad range of analog semiconductor devices with a focus on III-V based products. III-V semiconductor materials have higher electrical conductivity and thus tend to have better performance characteristics in radio frequency, or RF, and optoelectronic applications than silicon. We differentiate ourselves through our high performance design and integration capabilities. We serve four primary target markets: wireless communications, wired infrastructure, industrial and automotive electronics, and consumer and computing peripherals. Applications for our products in these target markets include cellular phones, consumer appliances, data networking and telecommunications equipment, enterprise storage and servers, factory automation, displays, optical mice and printers.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. Our critical accounting policies are those that affect our historical financial statements materially and involve difficult, subjective or complex judgments by management. Those policies include revenue recognition, valuation of long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, inventory valuation and warranty reserves, accounting for income taxes, retirement and post-retirement benefit plan assumptions, and share-based compensation.

There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 compared to those previously disclosed in “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

18

Results from Operations

Fiscal Quarter and Two Fiscal Quarters Ended April 29, 2012 Compared to Fiscal Quarter and Two Fiscal Quarters Ended May 1, 2011

The following tables set forth our results of operations for the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011.

	Fiscal Quarter Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011			April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
	(In millions)					(As a percentage of net revenue)
Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenue	$	577	$	560		100	%	100	%
Cost of products sold:
Cost of products sold	284		271			49		48
Amortization of intangible assets	14		14			3		3
Restructuring charges	1		—			—		—
Total cost of products sold	299		285			52		51
Gross margin	278		275			48		49
Research and development	84		76			14		14
Selling, general and administrative	51		55			9		10
Amortization of intangible assets	5		5			1		1
Restructuring charges	1		1			—		—
Total operating expenses	141		137			24		25
Income from operations	137		138			24		24
Interest expense	—		(1		)	—		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—		(1		)	—		—
Other income, net	3		1			—		—
Income before income taxes	140		137			24		24
Provision for income taxes	6		2			1		—
Net income	$	134	$	135		23	%	24	%

19

	Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011			April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
	(In millions)						(As a percentage of net revenue)
Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenue	$	1,140		$	1,110		100	%	100	%
Cost of products sold:
Cost of products sold	563			536			49		48
Amortization of intangible assets	28			28			3		3
Restructuring charges	1			—			—		—
Total cost of products sold	592			564			52		51
Gross margin	548			546			48		49
Research and development	166			149			14		13
Selling, general and administrative	101			105			9		10
Amortization of intangible assets	10			11			1		1
Restructuring charges	2			1			—		—
Total operating expenses	279			266			24		24
Income from operations	269			280			24		25
Interest expense	(1		)	(4		)	—		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			(20		)	—		(2	)
Other income, net	2			1			—		—
Income before income taxes	270			257			24		23
Provision for income taxes	11			3			1		—
Net income	$	259		$	254		23	%	23	%

Net revenue. Net revenue was $577 million for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012, compared to $560 million for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011, an increase of $17 million or 3%. Net revenue was $1,140 million for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, compared to $1,110 million for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, an increase of $30 million or 3%. The increase in net revenue was primarily due to strength in the wireless communication target markets, largely offset by weakness in our industrial target market.

Our three largest target markets, by revenue, are wireless communications, wired infrastructure and industrial and automotive electronics, with computer and consumer computing peripherals typically representing a much smaller percentage of our overall net revenue. The percentage of total net revenue generated by sales in each of our target markets varies from quarter to quarter, due largely to fluctuations in end-market demand, including the effects of seasonality. The first fiscal quarter is typically our lowest revenue and cash generating quarter due, in part, to holiday shut downs at many original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, customers and distributors, and the first half of the fiscal year tends to generate lower revenue than the second half. However, typical seasonality and industry cyclicality may be overshadowed by other factors such as wider macroeconomic effects, timing of significant product transitions and launches by large OEMs and new product launches by our competitors. In the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012, strength in the smartphone market and strong sales to a particular OEM more than offset the typical seasonal downward trend in revenue from our wireless target market. We do not currently expect to experience the typical seasonal increase in revenue from our wireless target market in the third fiscal quarter of 2012, due to constraints in the supply chain of certain of our end customers as well as timing of product transitions at certain of our OEM customers. Weakness in industrial spending, in China in particular, together with the flooding in Thailand in late 2011, a critical area for manufacturing many components important for the semiconductor supply chain, adversely impacted revenue from our industrial target market in the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012. However, the industrial market began to recover during the second fiscal quarter of 2012, particularly in China. We currently expect the industrial market to continue to improve in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.

Historically, a relatively small number of customers have accounted for a significant portion of our net revenue. During the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, Foxconn Technology Group companies accounted for 16% and 17% of our net revenue, respectively. Our top 10 customers for each of the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, which included three distributors each, collectively accounted for 62% of our net revenue. However, we believe that aggregate sales of our products to certain of our customers exceeds the amount of our direct sales to them. For example, we believe our aggregate sales to two OEMs, when direct sales are combined with indirect sales to them through the respective contract manufacturers that they utilize, each accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues, for each of the fiscal quarter

20

and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012. We expect to continue to experience significant customer concentration in future periods.

Net revenue by target market data is derived from our understanding of our end customers’ primary markets, and was as follows:

	Fiscal Quarter Ended						Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
% of net revenue	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		Change		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		Change
Wireless communications	44	%	36	%	8	%	45	%	37	%	8	%
Wired infrastructure	29		29		—		29		28		1
Industrial and automotive electronics	22		30		(8	)	21		30		(9	)
Consumer and computing peripherals	5		5		—		5		5		—
Total net revenue	100	%	100	%			100	%	100	%

	Fiscal Quarter Ended							Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
Net revenue (in millions)	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		Change			April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		Change
Wireless communications	$	255	$	203	$	52		$	509	$	405	$	104
Wired infrastructure	168		160		8			330		313		17
Industrial and automotive electronics	124		167		(43		)	238		333		(95		)
Consumer and computing peripherals	30		30		—			63		59		4
Total net revenue	$	577	$	560	$	17		$	1,140	$	1,110	$	30

Net revenue from our wireless communications target market increased substantially in both the second quarter and first two quarters of fiscal year 2012 compared with the corresponding prior year periods due to continued strength in mobile smartphone sales. New product ramps at major smartphone OEMs drove revenue growth during the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012. We experienced higher demand for our multi-mode, multi-band power amplifiers, in particular, as well as for our FBAR duplexers in the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012.

Net revenue from our wired infrastructure target market increased slightly, in the second quarter and first two quarters of fiscal year 2012, compared with the corresponding prior year periods, as demand for our newer core routing products increased. During the second quarter and first two quarters of fiscal year 2012, we saw strong growth from sales of our ASICs and proprietary parallel optics used in core routing environments and data center applications compared to the corresponding periods in fiscal year 2011. During the second quarter and first two quarters of fiscal year 2012, revenue from wired infrastructure target market increased by $8 million and $6 million, respectively, due to increased development agreement revenue and intellectual property licensing revenue. However for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, these effects were partially offset by a supply chain correction amongst several OEMs in the wired infrastructure market in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012.

Net revenue from our industrial and automotive electronics target market decreased in the second quarter and first two quarters of fiscal year 2012 compared with the corresponding prior year periods. This decrease was due primarily to continued, and worse than expected, supply chain corrections, weakness in industrial spending, in China in particular, softness in distributor resales and weaker OEM demand during the second quarter and first two quarters of fiscal year 2012, compared with the same periods in fiscal year 2011. The flooding in Thailand impacted the manufacturing of certain products we sell into our industrial target market during the fiscal quarter ended January 29, 2012, which contributed to the decrease in revenues from this target market in the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012.

Net revenue from our consumer and computing peripherals target market remained flat in the second quarter of fiscal year 2012 and increased slightly in the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012 compared with the corresponding periods in 2011, due primarily to sales and licensing of certain of our intellectual property. However, net revenue from this target market during both these periods continued to be adversely affected by ongoing softness in demand for personal computers and printers. Historically, most of our revenue from the consumer and computing peripherals target market has been from the sale of mouse products. However, as this is a mature and non-strategic market for us, we have been moving away from developing, manufacturing and selling these products to licensing or selling our intellectual property relevant to this target market, thereby generating royalty revenue instead of product sales. During the fiscal quarter and the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, we generated approximately $3 million and $13 million, respectively, in intellectual property-related revenue from this target market.

21

Gross margin. Gross margin was $278 million for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 compared to $275 million for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011, a slight increase of $3 million. Gross margin was $548 million for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 compared to $546 million for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, a slight increase of $2 million. As a percentage of net revenue, gross margin decreased slightly to 48% for each of the fiscal quarter and two quarters ended April 29, 2012 from 49% for each of the fiscal quarter and two quarters ended May 1, 2011.

The increases in gross margin dollars were primarily due to (i) an increase of $14 million and $23 million in revenue from development agreements and sales and licensing of intellectual property in the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively, (ii) a $2 million and $5 million decrease in depreciation expense during the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively, resulting from a change in the duration of the useful lives of certain of our manufacturing equipment which occurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, and (iii) a $3 million and $6 million decrease in cost of products sold due to a revision in cost allocation methodology during the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively, in each case when compared to the corresponding periods in fiscal year 2011. However, these increases were primarily offset by a less profitable product mix, with a higher proportion of sales into our wireless communication target market compared to sales into our higher-margin industrial and automotive electronics target market, in the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012. As discussed above, during the fiscal quarter ended January 29, 2012, we revised our cost allocation methodology to fully burden with overhead costs the expense for wafers used in research and development projects that are processed through our internal fabrication facilities, or R&D wafer cost allocation methodology.

Research and development. Research and development expense was $84 million for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012, compared to $76 million for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011, an increase of $8 million or 11%. Part of the increase in absolute dollars was attributable to a $5 million increase in research and development project consumables and services, $3 million of which was due to the change in R&D wafer cost allocation methodology, as discussed above under Gross margin, which increased gross margin by a corresponding amount. The increase in research and development expense was also attributable to a $2 million increase in share-based compensation expense attributable to grants of share-based awards at higher fair market values and to our Employee Share Purchase Plan, or ESPP, and a $3 million increase in depreciation expense related to capital expenditures supporting research and development efforts, partially offset by a $2 million decrease in accrued incentive compensation expense compared to the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011. The overall increase in research and development expense is net of $2 million in accrued reimbursements pursuant to research and development grants.

Research and development expense was $166 million for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, compared to $149 million for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, an increase of $17 million or 11%. As a percentage of net revenue, research and development expenses increased slightly to 14% for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, compared to 13% for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011. The majority of this increase, in absolute dollars, resulted from investments in our wired infrastructure and wireless communications solutions. Part of the increase was attributable to a $8 million increase in research and development project consumables and services, $6 million of which was due to the change in R&D wafer cost allocation methodology, as discussed above under Gross margin, which increased gross margin by a corresponding amount. The increase in research and development expense was also attributable to a $5 million increase in depreciation expense related to capital expenditures supporting research and development efforts and a $3 million increase in share-based compensation expense attributable to grants of share-based awards at higher fair market values and to our ESPP, partially offset by a $1 million decrease in accrued incentive compensation expense compared to the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011. The overall increase in research and development expense is net of $4 million in accrued reimbursements pursuant to research and development grants.

Selling, general and administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense was $51 million for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012, compared to $55 million for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011, a decrease of $4 million or 7%. As a percentage of net revenue, selling, general and administrative expense decreased slightly to 9% from 10% for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011. Changes in components of selling, general and administrative expense for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 consisted of a $2 million decrease in legal expenses related to offensive litigation matters, a $2 million decrease in accrued incentive compensation expense and a $1 million decrease in depreciation expense, partially offset by a $1 million increase in share-based compensation expense attributable to grants of share-based awards at higher fair market values and to our ESPP and a $1 million increase in foreign currency transaction losses from hedged transactions, compared to the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011.

Selling, general and administrative expense was $101 million for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 compared to $105 million for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, a decrease of $4 million or 4%. Changes in components of selling, general and administrative expense for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 consisted of a $4 million decrease in legal expenses related to offensive litigation matters and a $3 million decrease in depreciation expense, partially offset by a $4 million increase in share-based compensation expense attributable to grants of share-based awards at higher fair market values and to our ESPP, compared to the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011.

Amortization of intangible assets. Total amortization of intangible assets incurred were $19 million for each of the fiscal

22

quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011. Total amortization of intangible assets incurred were $38 million and $39 million for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively.

Restructuring charges. We incurred $2 million and $3 million in restructuring charges for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively, compared to restructuring charges of $1 million each for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011.

Interest expense. Interest expense was $0 million and $1 million for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, representing ongoing commitment fees related to our revolving credit facility, compared to $1 million and $4 million for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the redemption of the remaining $230 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding senior subordinated notes in the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011.

Loss on extinguishment of debt. During the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, we redeemed $230 million aggregate principal amount of our senior subordinated notes. The redemption of the senior subordinated notes resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $19 million. During the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011, we replaced our existing revolving credit facility with a new revolving credit facility. This resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1 million, primarily related to the write-off of debt amortization costs. See Note 5 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Other income, net. Other income, net includes interest income, foreign currency gains (losses) on balance sheet remeasurement and other miscellaneous items. Other income, net was $3 million and $2 million for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively, compared to other income, net of $1 million for each of the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011. The increase in other income net for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 is primarily attributable to an increase in interest income and foreign currency gains. The increase in other income, net for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, compared to the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 is primarily attributable to a $2 million allocation of insurance proceeds received relating to claims arising out of the flooding in Thailand and an $1 million increase in interest income, partially offset by an $1 million impairment of a cost method investment and a $1 million impairment of a loan to the same cost method investee.

Provision for income taxes. We recorded an income tax provision of $6 million and $11 million for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively, compared to $2 million and $3 million for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, respectively. The tax expense for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 included a benefit of $3 million from U.S. legislation enacted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 retroactively reinstating the research and development tax credit, while the overall year over year increase in tax provisions for all periods presented in fiscal year 2012 was due to a change in the jurisdictional mix of income and expense.

Backlog

Our sales are generally made pursuant to short-term purchase orders. These purchase orders are made without deposits and may be rescheduled, canceled or modified on relatively short notice, and in most cases without substantial penalty. Therefore, we believe that purchase orders or backlog are not a reliable indicator of future sales.

Seasonality

We are affected by seasonal trends in the semiconductor and related industries. We typically experience sequentially lower revenues in the first half of the fiscal year. Our revenue in the second half of the fiscal year is typically higher than our revenue in the first half of the fiscal year due to seasonality in two of our target markets, wireless communications and consumer and computing peripherals. These target markets typically experience seasonality due to the “back to school” and calendar year-end holiday selling seasons, although macroeconomic effects and other factors such as significant product transitions and launches by large OEMs can overshadow or mute typical seasonal effects. See Net revenue for a further discussion of seasonal trends on our results of operations for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity as at April 29, 2012 consisted of: (1) approximately $954 million in cash and cash equivalents, (2) cash we expect to generate from operations and (3) our $200 million revolving credit facility, which is committed until March 31, 2015, all of which is available to be drawn.

Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements primarily arise from: (i) working capital requirements, (ii) research and development and capital expenditure needs, including acquisitions from time to time and (iii) quarterly dividend payments (if and when declared by our board of directors, or the Board) and any share repurchases we may choose to make under our share repurchase program. Our ability to fund these requirements will depend on our future cash flows, which are determined by future operating performance and are, therefore, subject to prevailing global macroeconomic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

If we do not retain a sufficient amount of cash to fund our operations or finance growth opportunities, including acquisitions, or unanticipated capital expenditures, our financial condition and our business could suffer. We may seek to obtain

23

debt or equity financing in the future. However, we cannot assure that such additional financing will be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. Our ability to service any indebtedness we may incur, under our revolving credit facility, or otherwise, will also depend on our ability to generate cash in the future.

In June 2011, our Board, authorized the repurchase of up to 15 million of the Company’s outstanding ordinary shares, not to exceed $500 million, in the aggregate, referred to as the 2011 share repurchase program. Under the 2011 share repurchase program, the Company repurchased 2.8 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $85 million in cash, during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012. On April 4, 2012, our Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to 15 million of its ordinary shares, referred to as the 2012 share repurchase program. This replaces the 2011 share repurchase program, which expired at the Company's 2012 Annual General Meeting, or AGM, held on April 4, 2012. Shares repurchases under the 2012 share repurchase program, if any, will be made in the open market at such times and in such amounts as the Company deems appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, market conditions and applicable legal requirements. The 2012 share repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares and may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. The 2012 share repurchase program, will expire at the Company's 2013 AGM, unless earlier terminated. As of April 29, 2012, no shares had been purchased under the 2012 share repurchase program.

On June 6, 2012, the Board declared an interim cash dividend on the Company’s ordinary shares of $0.15 per share, payable on June 29, 2012 to shareholders of record at the close of business (5:00 p.m.), Eastern Time, on June 18, 2012.

Our cash and cash equivalents increased by $125 million to $954 million at April 29, 2012 from $829 million at October 30, 2011. The increase was attributable to $350 million cash provided by operating activities and $22 million in cash received from the issuance of ordinary shares upon exercises of options under our employee equity incentive plans and purchases of shares under our ESPP. The increase was offset by $85 million of cash paid to repurchase 2.8 million of our ordinary shares, $103 million cash paid for capital expenditures, and $61 million in dividends paid to our shareholders.

We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, and cash flows from operations, combined with availability under our revolving credit facility, will provide sufficient liquidity to fund our current obligations, projected working capital requirements, capital spending, quarterly dividends (if and when declared by our Board) and any share repurchases we may choose to make under our share repurchase program for at least the next 12 months. We anticipate that our capital expenditures for fiscal year 2012 will be significantly higher than for fiscal year 2011, due primarily to spending on capacity expansion in our Fort Collins internal fabrication facility, as well as spending on equipment to support various research and development projects. If we do not have sufficient cash to fund our operations or finance growth opportunities, including acquisitions, or unanticipated capital expenditures, our business and financial condition could suffer. We could also reduce certain expenditures such as repurchases of our ordinary shares and payment of our quarterly dividend. In such circumstances we may seek to obtain debt or equity financing in the future. However, we cannot assure that such additional financing will be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. Our ability to service any indebtedness we may incur, including under our revolving credit facility, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. In addition, even though we may not need additional funds, we may still elect to sell additional debt or equity securities or increase our current credit facility for other reasons.

In summary, our cash flows were as follows (in millions):

	Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	350		$	320
Net cash used in investing activities	(103		)	(60		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(122		)	(225		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	125		$	35

Cash Flows for the Two Fiscal Quarters Ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 was $350 million. The net cash provided by operating activities was principally due to net income of $259 million, which includes $6 million of insurance proceeds received in respect of claims relating to the flooding in Thailand, and non-cash charges of $103 million, partially offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $12 million. The non-cash charges of $103 million included $75 million for depreciation and amortization and $24 million of share-based compensation.

Accounts receivable decreased to $274 million at April 29, 2012 from $328 million at the end of fiscal year 2011. The number of days sales outstanding decreased to 43 days at April 29, 2012 from 48 days at October 30, 2011 due to linearity of revenue and a stronger focus on collections. We use the current quarter revenue and accounts receivable at quarter end in our calculation of number of days sales outstanding.

24

Inventory increased to $218 million at April 29, 2012 from $194 million at the end of fiscal year 2011. The number of days of inventory on hand increased to 70 days at April 29, 2012 compared to 58 days at October 30, 2011 due to an increase in inventory to prepare for an anticipated increase in demand, as well as a significant wafer purchase in the quarter ended April 29, 2012 to secure advantageous pricing. We use the current quarter cost of products sold and inventory at quarter end in our calculation of days on hand of inventory.

Other current assets increased to $62 million at April 29, 2012 from $42 million at the end of fiscal year 2011 primarily due to a $10 million increase in receivables from our contract manufacturers for materials purchased on their behalf, a $3 million increase in receivables from intellectual property-related revenue and a $6 million increase in advances made to certain of our existing distributors for anticipated distributor price adjustments. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, we entered into agreements with these distributors whereby we agreed to advance cash to them to fund estimated price adjustments. These advances are estimated based on an agreed percentage of the rolling previous three months average ending inventory as reported by the distributor multiplied by the rolling previous three months price adjustment credits as a percentage of the distributor's reported rolling previous three months resales. The terms of these advances are set forth in binding legal agreements and are unsecured, bear no interest on unsettled balances, and are due upon demand. The agreements governing these advances can be cancelled by us at any time. Such advances have no impact on revenue recognition or our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and are recorded in other current assets on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. 

Current liabilities increased to $356 million at April 29, 2012 from $350 million at the end of fiscal year 2011 primarily due to an increase in accounts payable, partially offset by a decrease in employee compensation and benefits accruals. Accounts payable increased to $257 million from $221 million at the end of fiscal year 2011 mainly due to timing of disbursements. Employee compensation and benefits accruals decreased to $57 million at April 29, 2012 from $89 million at fiscal year 2011 mainly due to payments made under our employee bonus plan in respect of fiscal year 2011 performance.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 was $320 million. The net cash provided by operating activities was principally due to net income of $254 million and non-cash charges of $108 million, partially offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $42 million. The non-cash charges of $108 million included $79 million for depreciation and amortization, $16 million of share-based compensation, $8 million in tax benefits from share-based compensation and $6 million of debt issuance costs written off in connection with our debt redemption. Net income was also reduced by $14 million for the premium paid on our debt redemption which is included in the $19 million loss on extinguishment of debt in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Accounts receivable increased to $289 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 from $285 million at the end of fiscal year 2010. The number of days sales outstanding increased to 47 days at May 1, 2011 from 45 days at October 31, 2010 due to linearity of revenue.

Inventory increased to $194 million at May 1, 2011 from $189 million at the end of fiscal year 2010. The number of days of

inventory on hand increased to 65 days at May 1, 2011 compared to 61 days at October 31, 2010.

Current liabilities decreased to $296 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 from $565 million at the end of fiscal year 2010, mainly due to the redemption of $230 million of long-term debt that was classified as current at October 31, 2010 (as it had been irrevocably called for redemption before the fiscal year end) and decreases in employee compensation and benefits accruals and accrued interest, offset by an increase in accounts payable. Employee compensation and benefits decreased to $62 million from $82 million at fiscal year 2010 mainly due to payments made under our employee bonus plan in respect of fiscal year 2010 performance. Accrued interest decreased to less than $1 million from fiscal year 2010 mainly due to the debt redemption and semi-annual interest payments made during the first half of fiscal year 2011. Accounts payable increased to $206 million from $198 million at the end of fiscal year 2010 mainly due to timing of disbursements.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 was $103 million, due to purchases of property, plant and equipment in connection with the expansion of our manufacturing facility in Fort Collins, Colorado.

Net cash used in investing activities for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 was $60 million, primarily due to purchases of property, plant and equipment of $51 million, in connection with the expansion of our manufacturing facilities in Fort Collins, Colorado, and in Singapore and $8 million related to a business acquisition completed in the first two fiscal quarters of fiscal year 2011.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 was $122 million. The net cash used in financing activities was principally due to an aggregate of $61 million in payments of cash dividends to shareholders and the payment of an aggregate of $85 million to repurchase and cancel 2.8 million shares of our ordinary shares under our share repurchase program. This was partially offset by $22 million in net proceeds provided by the exercise of options and purchases under our ESPP.

25

Net cash used in financing activities for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 was $225 million. The net cash used in financing activities was principally due to the redemption of the remaining $230 million in principal amount of senior subordinated notes and $37 million in payments of cash dividends to shareholders, partially offset by $44 million provided by the issuance of ordinary shares upon the exercise of options and purchases under our ESPP.

Indebtedness

As of April 29, 2012, we had $4 million of capital lease obligations. At such date, we also had $200 million of borrowing capacity available under our revolving credit facility. We had no borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility as of April 29, 2012.

Contractual Commitments

See Note 11 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

There were no other substantial changes to our contractual commitments during the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012 from those disclosed in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no material off-balance sheet arrangements at April 29, 2012 as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

Indemnifications

See Note 11 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Accounting Changes and Recent Accounting Standards

For a description of accounting changes and recent accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements, see Note 1 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes in market risk from the information presented in Part II, Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K other than those noted below.

Foreign Currency Derivative Instruments

Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, as well as derivative instruments, were included in our unaudited consolidated statements of operations in the amounts of $1 million gain and less than $1 million loss, for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, compared to $1 million gain each, for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, respectively.

European Debt Exposures

We actively monitor our exposure to the European financial markets, including the impact of sovereign debt issues. We also mitigate our risk by investing in fixed deposits with various financial institutions and we limit the amount we hold with any one institution. We do not have any direct investments in the sovereign debt of European countries. From time to time, we may have deposits with major European financial institutions. We also mitigate collection risks from our customers by performing regular credit evaluations of our customers' financial conditions and requiring collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances. As of April 29, 2012, we do not believe that we have any material direct or indirect exposure to the European financial markets.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of April 29, 2012. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are intended to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act filings is properly and timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported. These disclosure controls and procedures are also intended to ensure that information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of April 29, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial

26

reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

27

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in litigation that we believe is of the type common to companies engaged in our line of business, including commercial disputes and employment issues. As of the date of this filing, we are not involved in any pending legal proceedings that we believe would likely have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, from time to time certain disputes involve claims by third parties that our activities infringe their patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property rights. These claims generally involve the demand by a third-party that we cease the manufacture, use or sale of the allegedly infringing products, processes or technologies and/or pay substantial damages or royalties for past, present and future use of the allegedly infringing intellectual property. For example, on July 23, 2009, TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc., or TriQuint, filed a complaint against us and certain of our subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court, District of Arizona seeking declaratory judgment that four of our patents relating to RF filter technology used in our wireless products are invalid and, if valid, that TriQuint’s products do not infringe any of those patents. TriQuint withdrew those claims with respect to three of those four patents. In addition, TriQuint claimed that certain of our wireless products infringe three of its patents. We filed our answer and initial counterclaim on September 17, 2009, denying infringement, asserting the invalidity of TriQuint’s patents and asserting infringement by TriQuint of ten Avago patents, and filed additional counterclaims on March 25, 2010 for the misappropriation of Avago trade secrets. On October 16, 2009, TriQuint filed its answer to our initial counterclaim, denying infringement and filed an antitrust counterclaim and counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non infringement and invalidity. The court dismissed TriQuint’s antitrust counterclaims on procedural grounds on March 16, 2010, but on August 3, 2010 granted TriQuint's motion to file an amended pleading for its anti-trust claims. Effective May 12, 2012, we entered into a confidential settlement and patent cross-license agreement with TriQuint that resolved these outstanding actions.

Claims that our products or processes infringe or misappropriate any third-party intellectual property rights (including claims arising through our contractual indemnification of our customers) often involve highly complex, technical issues, the outcome of which is inherently uncertain. Moreover, from time to time we pursue litigation to assert our intellectual property rights. Regardless of the merit or resolution of any such litigation, complex intellectual property litigation is generally costly and diverts the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

A description of some of the primary risk factors associated with our business is set forth below. We review and, where applicable, update our risk factors each quarter. The description set forth below supersedes the description of the risk factors previously disclosed in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 29, 2012. These risk factors, which could materially affect our business, financial conditions or results of operations, are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

Adverse global economic conditions could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and liquidity.

Adverse global economic conditions have from time to time caused or exacerbated significant slowdowns in the semiconductor industry generally, as well as in our target markets. The global recession in 2008 and 2009 caused U.S. and foreign businesses to slow spending on our products and caused consumers to reduce spending on many products our customers make, such as personal computers, mobile phone and flat screen televisions. In recent months, market and business conditions in general have been adversely affected by investor and customer concerns and about the global economic outlook, including concerns about the economic recovery in the United States and the ongoing sovereign debt crisis in Europe. A slowdown in the economic recovery or worsening global economic conditions as a result of these or other factors will likely cause our customers and consumers to reduce or delay spending, and could lead to the insolvency of key suppliers (resulting in product delays) and customers, all of which could negatively affect our business, financial condition and result of operations.

We operate in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry, which is subject tosignificant downturns.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and is characterized by constant and rapid technological change and price erosion, evolving technical standards, short product life cycles (for semiconductors and for the end-user products in which they are used) and wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. From time to time, these and other factors, together with changes in general economic conditions, cause significant upturns and downturns in the industry in general and in our business in particular. Periods of industry downturns have been characterized by diminished demand for end-user products, high inventory levels and periods of inventory adjustment, under-utilization of manufacturing capacity, changes in revenue mix and accelerated erosion of average selling prices, resulting in an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of

28

operations. We expect our business to continue to be subject to cyclical downturns even when overall economic conditions are relatively stable. In addition, in any future economic downturn we may be unable to grow our revenues or reduce our costs quickly enough to maintain our operating profitability.

Our operating results are subject to substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations.

Our revenues and operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations may occur on a quarterly and annual basis and are due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among others:

• changes in end-user demand for the products manufactured and sold by our customers;

• the timing of receipt, reduction or cancellation of significant orders by customers;

• fluctuations in the levels of component inventories held by our customers;

• the gain or loss of significant customers;

• market acceptance of our products and our customers' products;

• changes in our product mix or customer mix and their effect on our gross margin;

• our ability to develop, introduce and market new products and technologies on a timely basis;

• the timing and extent of our non-product revenue, such as product development revenues and royalty and other payments from intellectual property sales and licensing arrangements;

• new product announcements and introductions by us or our competitors;

• the timing of the launch by our customers of new products, such as cell phones, in which our products are included;

• timing and amount of research and development and related new product expenditures, and the timing of receipt of any research and development grant monies;

• seasonality or cyclical fluctuations in our markets;

• currency fluctuations;

• utilization of our internal manufacturing facilities;

• fluctuations in manufacturing yields;

• significant warranty claims, including those not covered by our suppliers or our insurers;

• availability and cost of raw materials from our suppliers;

• intellectual property disputes and associated litigation expenses;

• loss of key personnel or the shortage of available skilled workers;

• the effects of competitive pricing pressures, including decreases in average selling prices of our products; and

• changes in our tax incentive arrangements or structure, which may adversely affect our net tax expense in any quarter in which such an event occurs.

The foregoing factors are difficult to forecast, and these, as well as other factors, could materially adversely affect our quarterly or annual operating results. In addition, a significant amount of our operating expenses are relatively fixed in nature due to our significant sales, research and development and internal manufacturing overhead costs. Any failure to adjust spending quickly enough to compensate for a revenue shortfall could magnify the adverse impact of such revenue shortfall on our results of operations. As a result, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenue and operating results may not be meaningful or a reliable indicator of our future performance. If our operating results in one or more future quarters fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, an immediate and significant decline in the trading price of our ordinary shares may occur.

If we do not adapt to technological changes in the semiconductor industry, we couldlose customers or market share.

The semiconductor industry is subject to constant and rapid changes in technology, frequent new product introductions, short product life cycles, rapid product obsolescence and evolving technical standards. Technological developments may reduce the competitiveness of our products and require unbudgeted upgrades that could be expensive and time consuming to implement. Our products could become obsolete sooner than we expect because of faster than anticipated, or unanticipated, changes in one or more of the technologies related to our products. Furthermore, we continually evaluate expenditures for

29

research and development and must choose among alternative technologies based on our expectations of future market growth and other factors. We may be unable to develop and introduce new or enhanced products that satisfy customer requirements and achieve market acceptance in a timely manner or at all, the technologies where we have focused our research and development expenditures may not become commercially successful, and we may be unable to anticipate new industry standards and technological changes. We also may not be able to respond successfully to new product announcements and introductions by competitors. If we fail to adapt successfully to technological changes or fail to obtain access to important new technologies, we may be unable to retain customers, attract new customers or sell new products to our existing customers.

Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing other portions of our supplychain may adversely affect our ability to bring products to market and damage ourreputation.

We operate a primarily outsourced manufacturing business model that principally utilizes third-party foundry and assembly and test capabilities. As a result, we are highly reliant on third-party foundry wafer fabrication capacity, including sole- or single-sourcing for many components or products. For certain of our product families, substantially all of our revenue from those products is derived from semiconductors fabricated by external foundries such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. and WIN Semiconductor Corp. Most of our products are designed to be manufactured in a specific process, typically at one particular foundry with a particular contract manufacturer. We also use third-party contract manufacturers for a significant majority of our assembly and test operations, including Amertron Incorporated, the Hana Microelectronics Public Company Ltd. group of companies and Hisense Multimedia Broadband Technologies (HK) Co., Ltd. The ability and willingness of our contract manufacturers to perform is largely outside of our control. If one or more of our contract manufacturers or other outsourced providers fails to perform its obligations in a timely manner or at satisfactory quality levels, our ability to bring products to market and our reputation could suffer. Suppliers may, for example, extend lead times, limit supplies, increase prices or discontinue parts due to capacity constraints or other factors. In addition, some parts are not readily available from alternate suppliers due to their unique design or the length of time necessary for design work. If one of our suppliers, particularly a sole- or single-source supplier, ceases to, or is unable to, manufacture such a component or supply is otherwise constrained, for example as a result of a natural disaster, it may be difficult for us to transition the manufacture of that product to another foundry or contract manufacturer or source alternative parts, we may be forced to re-engineer a product and we may fail to timely meet customer demand. This could result in the payment of significant damages by us to our customers, and our net revenue could decline. In such events, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

We review our supply chain on an ongoing basis and may seek to qualify second source manufacturers and suppliers for some components and products. Qualifying such second sources may be a lengthy and potentially costly process.

To the extent we rely on third-party manufacturing relationships, we face the following risks:

• inability of our manufacturers to develop manufacturing methods appropriate for our products, and manufacturers' lack of sufficient capacity, or their unwillingness to devote adequate capacity, to produce our products;

• product and manufacturing costs that are higher than anticipated;

• reduced control over product reliability and delivery schedules;

• more complicated supply chains; and

• time, expense and uncertainty in identifying and qualifying additional or replacement manufacturers.

Much of our outsourcing takes place in developing countries, and as a result may additionally be subject to geopolitical uncertainty. See “— Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by the political and economic conditions of the countries in which we conduct business and other factors related to our international operations.”

A prolonged disruption of our manufacturing facilities or other significant operations could have a material adverseeffect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Although we operate using a primarily outsourced manufacturing business model, we also rely on the manufacturing facilities we own, in particular our fabrication facilities in Fort Collins, Colorado and Singapore. We maintain our internal fabrication facilities for products utilizing our innovative materials and processes, to protect our intellectual property, to develop the technology for manufacturing and to ensure supply of certain components. A prolonged disruption or material malfunction of, interruption in, or the loss of operations at, one or more of our production facilities, especially our Fort Collins and Singapore facilities, or the failure to maintain our labor force at one or more of these facilities, would limit our capacity to meet customer demands and delay new product development until a replacement facility and equipment, if necessary, were found. The lease on our primary internal fabrication facility in Singapore expires in 2015. If we are unable to renew this lease on satisfactory terms, we would be required to locate suitable replacement premises, with the goal of ensuring a smooth transition between facilities on or prior to the expiration of our current lease. However, the replacement of this, or any other, manufacturing facility could take an extended amount of time and significant expenditures on our part before manufacturing

30

operations could restart. While we would seek to minimize any disruption to our operations and supply chain associated with any such changes in manufacturing facilities, we may experience delays and significant costs resulting from these steps, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are also dependent on various information technology systems, including, but not limited to, networks, applications, and outsourced services. We continually enhance and implement new systems and processes throughout our global operations. Failure of these systems to operate effectively, could disrupt our operations and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations by harming our ability to accurately forecast sales demand, manage our supply chain and production facilities, fulfill customer orders, and report financial and management information on a timely and accurate basis.

Failure to adjust our supply chain volume due to changing market or other conditions orfailure to accurately estimate our customers' demand could adversely affect ourresults of operations.

We make significant decisions, including determining the levels of business that we will seek and accept, production schedules, levels of reliance on contract manufacturing and outsourcing, personnel needs and other resource requirements, based on our estimates of customer requirements. The short-term nature of commitments by many of our customers and the possibility of rapid changes in demand for their products reduces our ability to accurately estimate future customer requirements. Our results of operations could be harmed if we are unable to adjust our supply chain volume to address market fluctuations, including those caused by the seasonal or cyclical nature of the markets in which we operate, or by other unanticipated events such as natural disasters. In addition, the sale of our products is dependent, to a large degree, on customers whose industries are subject to seasonal or cyclical trends in the demand for their products. For example, the consumer electronics market is particularly volatile and is subject to seasonality related to the holiday selling season, making demand difficult to anticipate.

Severe supply chain disruptions, such as those caused by large scale natural disasters, can adversely affect our, and our customers', ability to source materials and components needed to manufacture products. In such event, even if we are able to promptly resume production of our affected products, if our customers cannot timely resume their own manufacturing following such an event, they may cancel or scale back their orders from us and this may in turn adversely affect our results of operations.

On occasion, customers may require rapid increases in production, which can challenge our resources and reduce margins. We may not be able to purchase sufficient supplies or components or secure sufficient contract manufacturing capacity, to meet such increases in product demand. This could harm our reputation, prevent us from taking advantage of opportunities, reduce revenue growth and subject us to additional liabilities if we are not able to timely satisfy customer orders.

In order to secure components for the production of our products, we may enter into non-cancelable purchase commitments with vendors or make advance payments to suppliers, which could reduce our ability to adjust our inventory or expense levels to declining market demands. Prior commitments of this type have resulted in an excess of parts when demand for our products has decreased. Downturns in the semiconductor industry have in the past caused, and may in the future cause, our customers to reduce significantly the amount of products ordered from us. If demand for our products is less than we expect, we may experience excess and obsolete inventories and be forced to incur additional charges. Conversely, if OEMs order more of our products in any particular quarter than are ultimately required to satisfy end customer demand, inventories at these OEMs may grow in such quarter, which could adversely affect our product revenues in a subsequent quarter as such OEMs would likely reduce future orders until their inventory levels realign with end customer demand. In addition, because certain of our sales, research and development and internal manufacturing overhead expenses are relatively fixed, a reduction in customer demand may decrease our gross margins and operating income.

Our operating results and financial condition could be harmed if the markets intowhich we sell our products decline.

Visibility into our markets is limited and any decline in our customers' markets would likely result in a reduction in demand for our products. In such an environment, pricing pressures could intensify and, if we were unable to respond quickly, could significantly reduce our gross margins. To the extent we cannot offset recessionary periods or periods of reduced growth that may occur in these markets through increased market share or otherwise, our net revenue may decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer. For example, we experienced a larger than expected decline in demand from our industrial target market towards the end of fiscal year 2011, which adversely affected our net revenues and gross margin. Pricing pressures and competition are especially intense in semiconductor-related industries, which could prevent achievement of our long-term financial goals and could require us to implement additional cost-cutting measures. Furthermore, industry growth rates may not be as forecasted, which could result in us spending on process and product development well ahead of market requirements, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

31

Unless we and our suppliers continuously improve manufacturing efficiency andquality, our financial performance could be adversely affected.

Manufacturing semiconductors involves highly complex processes that require advanced equipment. We and our suppliers, as well as our competitors, continuously modify these processes in an effort to improve yields and product performance. Defects or other difficulties in the manufacturing process can reduce yields and increase costs. Our manufacturing efficiency will be an important factor in our future financial performance, and we may be unable to maintain or increase our manufacturing efficiency to the same extent as our competitors. For products that we outsource manufacturing, our product yields and performance will be subject to the manufacturing efficiencies of our third-party suppliers.

From time to time, we and our suppliers have experienced difficulty in beginning production at new facilities, transferring production to other facilities, achieving and maintaining a high level of process quality and effecting transitions to new manufacturing processes, all of which have caused us to suffer delays in product deliveries or reduced yields. We and our suppliers may experience manufacturing problems in achieving acceptable yields or experience product delivery delays in the future as a result of, among other things, capacity constraints, construction delays, transferring production to other facilities (as we may be required to do with our manufacturing facility in Singapore, in or prior to 2015), upgrading or expanding existing facilities, including our Fort Collins facility, or changing our process technologies, any of which could result in a loss of future revenues. Our results of operations could be adversely affected by any increase in costs related to increases in production capacity if revenues do not increase proportionately.

Winning business is subject to lengthy, competitive selection processes that requireus to incur significant expense. Even if we begin a product design, a customer maydecide to cancel or change its product plans, which could cause us to generate norevenues from a product and adversely affect our results of operations.

We are focused on winning competitive bid selection processes, known as “design wins,” to develop semiconductors for use in our customers' products. These selection processes are typically lengthy and can require us to incur significant design and development expenditures and dedicate scarce engineering resources in pursuit of a single customer opportunity. We may not win the competitive selection process and may never generate any revenue despite incurring significant design and development expenditures. These risks are exacerbated by the fact that many of our products and the end products into which our products are incorporated often have very short life cycles. For example, cell-phone manufacturers regularly introduce new or upgraded handsets, often every 12-18 months and sometimes more frequently, and will bid out the components for each new model and often every upgrade of a particular model. Failure to obtain a design win sometimes prevents us from offering an entire generation of a product. This can result in lost revenues and could weaken our position in future competitive selection processes.

After winning a product design, we may experience delays in generating revenue from our products as a result of the lengthy development cycle typically required, or may not realize as much revenue as we had anticipated. In addition, a delay or cancellation of a customer's plans could materially and adversely affect our financial results, as we may have incurred significant expense in the design process and generated little or no revenue. Customers could choose at any time to stop using our products or may fail to successfully market and sell their products, which could reduce demand for our products and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Finally, the timing of design wins is unpredictable and implementing production for a major design win or multiple design wins occurring at or around the same time may strain our resources and those of our contract manufacturers. In such event we may be forced to dedicate significant additional resources and incur additional, unanticipated costs and expenses to fulfill such design wins, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual propertyrights or demands that we license third-party technology, which could result insignificant expense and loss of our intellectual property rights.

The semiconductor industry is characterized by companies holding large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets and by the vigorous pursuit, protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, including actions by patent-holding companies that do not make or sell products. From time to time, third parties assert against us and our customers and distributors their patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business.

Litigation or settlement of claims that our products or processes infringe or misappropriate these rights, regardless of their merit, are frequently costly and divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel. In addition, many of our customer agreements, and in some cases our asset sale agreements, require us to indemnify our customers or purchasers for third-party intellectual property infringement claims, which have required and may in the future require that we defend those claims, and might require that we pay damages in the case of adverse rulings. Claims of this sort could also harm our relationships with our customers and might deter future customers from doing business with us. We do not know whether we will prevail in such proceedings given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property litigation. If any pending or future proceedings result in an adverse outcome, we could be required to:

32

• cease the manufacture, use or sale of the infringing products, processes or technology;

• pay substantial damages for past, present and future use of the infringing technology;

• expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology;

• license technology from the third-party claiming infringement, which license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all;

• enter into cross-licenses with our competitors, which could weaken our overall intellectual property portfolio and our ability to compete in particular product categories;

• indemnify customers or distributors;

• pay substantial damages to our customers or end users to discontinue use or replace infringing technology with non-infringing technology; or

• relinquish intellectual property rights associated with one or more of our patent claims, if such claims are held invalid or otherwise unenforceable.

Any of the foregoing results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We utilize a significant amount of intellectual property in our business. If we areunable or fail to protect our intellectual property, our business could be adverselyaffected.

Our success depends in part upon protecting our intellectual property. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination of intellectual property rights, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and similar intellectual property, as well as customary contractual protections with our customers, suppliers, employees and consultants. We may be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual property rights, and even with significant expenditures we may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights valuable to our business. We are unable to predict that:

• intellectual property rights that we presently employ in our business will not lapse or be invalidated, circumvented, challenged, or, in the case of third-party intellectual property rights, licensed or sub-licensed to us, be licensed to others;

• our intellectual property rights will provide competitive advantages to us;

• rights previously granted by third parties to intellectual property rights licensed or assigned to us, including portfolio cross-licenses, will not hamper our ability to assert our intellectual property rights against potential competitors or hinder the settlement of currently pending or future disputes;

• any of our pending or future patent, trademark or copyright applications will be issued or have the coverage originally sought; or

• our intellectual property rights will be enforced in certain jurisdictions where competition may be intense or where legal protection may be weak.

In addition, our competitors or others may develop products or technologies that are similar or superior to our products or technologies, duplicate our products or technologies or design around our protected technologies. Effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or more limited in one or more relevant jurisdictions, relative to those protections available in the United States, may not be applied for or may be abandoned in one or more relevant jurisdictions. We may elect to abandon or divest patents or otherwise not pursue prosecution of certain pending patent applications due to strategic concerns or other factors. From time to time we pursue litigation to assert our intellectual property rights, including, in some cases, against third parties with whom we have ongoing relationships, such as customers and suppliers, and third parties may pursue litigation against us. An adverse decision in such types of legal action could limit our ability to assert our intellectual property rights and limit the value of our technology, including the loss of opportunities to sell or license our technology to others or to collect royalty payments based upon successful protection and assertion of our intellectual property against others. In addition, such legal actions or adverse decisions could otherwise negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time we may need to obtain additional intellectual property licenses or renew existing license agreements. We are unable to predict whether these license agreements can be obtained or renewed on acceptable terms or at all.

Competition in our industry could prevent us from growing our revenue and fromraising prices to offset increases in costs.

The global semiconductor market is highly competitive. We compete in different target markets to various degrees on the

33

basis of, among other things, quality, technical performance, price, product features, product system compatibility, system-level design capability, engineering expertise, responsiveness to customers, new product innovation, product availability, delivery timing and reliability, and customer sales and technical support. Current and prospective customers for our products evaluate our capabilities against the merits of our direct competitors. Some of our competitors are well established, have a more extensive product portfolio, have substantially greater market share and manufacturing, financial, research and development and marketing resources to pursue development, engineering, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of their products. In addition, many of our competitors have longer independent operating histories, greater presence in key markets, more comprehensive patent protection and greater name recognition. We compete with integrated device manufacturers, or IDMs, and fabless semiconductor companies as well as the internal resources of large, integrated OEMs. Our competitors range from large, international companies offering a wide range of semiconductor products to smaller companies specializing in narrow markets. We expect competition in the markets in which we participate to continue to increase as existing competitors improve or expand their product offerings. In addition, companies not currently in direct competition with us may introduce competing products in the future. Because our products are often building block semiconductors providing functions that in some cases can be integrated into more complex integrated circuits, or ICs, we also face competition from manufacturers of ICs, as well as customers that develop their own IC products.

Our ability to compete successfully depends on elements both within and outside of our control, including industry and general economic trends. During past periods of downturns in our industry, competition in the markets in which we operate intensified as manufacturers of semiconductors reduced prices in order to combat production overcapacity and high inventory levels. The actions of our competitors, particularly in the area of pricing, can have a substantial adverse impact on our revenues, and potentially on revenues in specific industry end markets. In periods where the semiconductor industry experiences significant declines, manufacturers in financial difficulties or in bankruptcy may implement pricing structures designed to ensure short-term market share and near-term survival, rather than securing long-term viability. In addition, many of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources than us with which to withstand adverse economic or market conditions and any associated pricing actions of other market participants in the future.

We make substantial investments in research and developmentto improve existing and develop new technologies to remain competitive in our business and unsuccessful investments could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The semiconductor industry requires substantial investment in research and development in order to develop and bring to market new and enhanced technologies and products. In order to remain competitive, we have made significant investments in research and development and anticipate that we will need to maintain or increase our levels of research and development expenditures. We expect research and development expenses to increase in absolute dollars for the foreseeable future, due to the increasing complexity and number of products we plan to develop. The technologies where we have focused or may focus our research and development expenditures may not become commercially successful. Significant investments in unsuccessful research and development efforts could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, increased investments in research and development could cause our cost structure to fall out of alignment with demand for our products, which would have a negative impact on our financial results.

Our business would be adversely affected by the departure of existing members of oursenior management team or if our senior management team is unable to effectivelyimplement our strategy.

Our success depends, in large part, on the continued contributions of our senior management team, in particular, the services of Mr. Hock E. Tan, our President and Chief Executive Officer. None of our senior management is bound by written employment contracts to remain with us for a specified period. In addition, we do not currently maintain key person life insurance covering our senior management. The loss of any of our senior management could harm our ability to implement our business strategy and respond to the rapidly changing market conditions in which we operate.

If we are unable to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, especially ourdesign and technical personnel, we may not be able to execute our business strategyeffectively.

Our future success depends on our ability to retain, attract and motivate qualified personnel, including our management, sales and marketing, legal and finance, and especially our design and technical personnel. We do not know whether we will be able to retain all of these employees as we continue to pursue our business strategy. We have historically encountered difficulties in hiring and retaining qualified engineers because there is a limited pool of engineers with expertise in analog and optoelectronic semiconductor design. Competition for such personnel is intense in the semiconductor industry, particularly in Southeast Asia where qualified engineers are currently in high demand. As the source of our technological and product innovations, our design and technical personnel represent a significant asset. The loss of the services of key employees, especially our key design and technical personnel, or our inability to retain, attract and motivate qualified design and technical personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

34

We are subject to warranty claims, product recalls and product liability.

We are currently, and from time to time may be, subject to warranty or product liability claims that have lead, and may in the future lead, to significant expenses as we compensate affected customers for costs incurred related to product quality issues. Although we maintain reserves for reasonably estimable liabilities and purchase product liability insurance, our reserves may be inadequate to cover the uninsured portion of such claims. Conversely, in some cases, amounts we reserve may ultimately exceed our actual liability for particular claims and may need to be reversed. For example, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 we identified a product quality issue with a particular component that we took steps to correct, including notifying our customers, offering to replace such components and provide customers with appropriate financial compensation. Through April 29, 2012, we had recorded an aggregate of $11 million in charges (including a reversal of warranty accrual of $6 million in the year ended October 30, 2011) associated with this issue, and may incur additional charges as we continue to work with our customers to resolve the matter.

Although we maintain product liability insurance, such insurance is subject to significant deductibles and there is no guarantee that such insurance will be available or adequate to protect against all such claims, or we may elect to self-insure with respect to certain matters. We may incur costs and expenses in the event of any recall of a customer's product containing one of our devices. The process of identifying a recalled product in devices that have been widely distributed may be lengthy and require significant resources, and we may incur significant replacement costs, contract damage claims from our customers and reputational harm. Our customer contracts typically contain warranty and indemnification provisions, and in certain cases may also contain liquidated damages provisions, relating to product quality issues. The potential liabilities associated with such provisions are significant, and in some cases, including in agreements with some of our largest customers, are potentially unlimited. Any such liabilities may greatly exceed any revenues we receive from the relevant products. Costs, payments or damages incurred or paid by us in connection with warranty and product liability claims and product recalls could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The complexity of our products could result in unforeseen delays or expenses orundetected defects or bugs, which could adversely affect the market acceptance of newproducts, damage our reputation with current or prospective customers, andmaterially and adversely affect our operating costs.

Highly complex products such as the products that we offer, may contain defects and bugs when they are first introduced or as new versions are released, or their release may be delayed due to unforeseen difficulties during product development. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, these defects, bugs and delays. If any of our products contain defects or bugs, or have reliability, quality or compatibility problems, we may not be able to successfully design workarounds. Consequently, our reputation may be damaged and customers may be reluctant to buy our products, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to retain existing customers, attract new customers, and our financial results. In addition, these defects or bugs could interrupt or delay sales to our customers. To resolve these problems, we may have to invest significant capital and other resources. Although our products are tested by our suppliers, our customers and ourselves, it is possible that our new products will contain defects or bugs. If any of these problems are not found until after we have commenced commercial production of a new product, we may be required to incur additional development costs and product recall, repair or replacement costs. These problems may also result in claims against us by our customers or others. For example, if a delay in the manufacture and delivery of our products causes the delay of a customer's product delivery, we may be required, under the terms of our agreement with that customer, to compensate the customer for the adverse effects of such delays. In addition, these problems may divert our technical and other resources from other development efforts, and we would likely lose, or experience a delay in, market acceptance of the affected product or products, and we could lose credibility with our current and prospective customers. As a result, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

We are subject to currency exchange risks that could adversely affect our operations.

Although a majority of our revenue and operating expenses is denominated in U.S. dollars, and we prepare our financial statements in U.S. dollars in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP, a portion of our revenue and operating expenses is in foreign currencies. As a result, we are subject to currency risks that could adversely affect our operations, including:

• risks resulting from changes in currency exchange rates and the implementation of exchange controls; and

• limitations on our ability to reinvest earnings from operations in one country to fund the capital needs of our operations in other countries.

Changes in exchange rates will result in increases or decreases in our costs and earnings, and will also affect the book value of our monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies and the amount of our total shareholders' equity. Although we seek to minimize our currency exposure by engaging in hedging transactions where we deem it appropriate, we do not know whether our efforts will be successful.

35

The demands or loss of one or more of our significant customers may adversely affectour business.

Some of our customers are material to our business and results of operations. During the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, Foxconn Technology Group companies accounted for 17% of our net revenue and our top 10 customers, which included three distributors, collectively accounted for 62% of our net revenue. During fiscal year 2011, no direct customer accounted for 10% or more of our net revenue, but our top 10 customers, which included three distributors, collectively accounted for 54% of our net revenue. However, we believe that aggregate sales of our products to certain of our customers exceeds the amount of our direct sales to them. For example, we believe our aggregate sales to two OEMs, when direct sales are combined with indirect sales to them through the respective contract manufacturers that they utilize, each accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues, respectively, for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012. Our top customers' purchasing power has, in some cases, given them the ability to make greater demands on us with regard to pricing and contractual terms in general. We expect this trend to continue, which may adversely affect our gross margins on certain products. In addition, we expect this will result in our results of operations becoming increasingly sensitive to deterioration in the financial condition of, or other adverse developments related to, one or more of our significant customers. Although we believe that our relationships with our major customers are good, we generally do not have long-term contracts with any of them, which is typical of our industry. As a result, although our customers provide indications of their product needs and purchases on an annual basis, they generally purchase our products on a weekly or daily basis and the relationship, as well as particular orders, can be terminated at any time. The loss of any of our major customers, or any substantial reduction in sales to any of these customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to risks associated with our distributors' product inventories andproduct sell-through.

We sell many of our products to customers through distributors who maintain their own inventory of our products for sale to dealers and end users. We limit distributor return rights and we allow limited price adjustments on sales to distributors. Price adjustments may be effected by way of credits for future product or by cash payments to the distributor either in arrears or in advance based on estimates. We record reserves for distributor rights related to these limited stock returns and price adjustments. We recognize revenues for sales to distributors upon delivery to the distributors, net of estimated provisions for these stock return and price adjustment programs. We may extend these programs with distributors from time to time. The reserves recorded for these programs are based on significant judgments and estimates, using historical experience rates, inventory levels in distribution, current trends and other factors, and there could be significant differences between actual amounts and our estimates. In addition, the timing and mix of payments and credits associated with such price adjustments could change over time, which could adversely affect our cash flows. Sales to distributors accounted for 30% and 37% of our net revenue for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and fiscal year 2011, respectively.

If our distributors are unable to sell an adequate amount of their inventory of our products in a given quarter to dealers and end users or if they decide to decrease their inventories for any reason, such as due to adverse global economic conditions or due to any downturn in technology spending, our sales to these distributors and our revenues may decline. In addition, if distributors decide to purchase more inventory in any particular quarter, due to product availability or other reasons, than is required to satisfy end customer demand, inventory at our distributors may grow in such quarter, which could adversely affect our product revenues in a subsequent quarter as such distributors will likely reduce future orders until their inventory levels realign with end customer demand.

We also face the risk that our distributors may for other reasons have inventory levels of our products in excess of future anticipated sales. If such sales do not occur in the time frame anticipated by these distributors for any reason, these distributors may substantially decrease the amount of product they order from us in subsequent periods, which would harm our business.

Our reserve estimates associated with products stocked by our distributors are based largely on reports that our distributors provide to us on a monthly basis. To date, we believe this data has been generally accurate. To the extent that this resale and channel inventory data is inaccurate or not received in a timely manner, we may not be able to make reserve estimates for future periods accurately or at all.

We generally do not have any long-term supply contracts with our contractmanufacturers or materials suppliers and may not be able to obtain the products orraw materials required for our business, which could have a material adverse affecton our business.

We either obtain the products we need for our business from third-party contract manufacturers or we obtain the materials we need for our products from suppliers, some of which are our single source suppliers for these materials. We purchase a significant portion of our semiconductor materials and finished goods from a few suppliers and contract manufacturers. For the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012, we purchased 52% of the materials for our manufacturing processes from six suppliers. For fiscal year 2011, we purchased 55% of the materials for our manufacturing processes from seven suppliers. Substantially all of our purchases are on a purchase order basis, and we have not generally entered into long-term contracts with our contract manufacturers or suppliers. In the event that these purchase orders or relationships with suppliers are terminated, we cannot obtain sufficient quantities of raw materials at reasonable prices, the quality of the material deteriorates, we fail to satisfy our

36

customers' requirements or we are not able to pass on higher materials or energy costs to our customers, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.

Our manufacturing processes rely on many materials, including silicon and GaAs wafers, copper lead frames, precious metals, mold compound, ceramic packages and various chemicals and gases. From time to time, suppliers may extend lead times, limit supplies or increase prices due to commodity price increases, capacity constraints or other factors. Although we believe that our current supplies of materials are adequate, shortages could occur in various essential materials due to interruption of supply or increased demand in the industry.

We use third-party contractor manufacturers for most of our manufacturing activities, primarily for wafer fabrication and module assembly and test services. Our agreements with these manufacturers typically require us to forecast product needs, commit to purchase services consistent with these forecasts and may require other commitments in the early stages of the relationship. Our operations could be adversely affected in the event that these contractual relationships were disrupted or terminated, the cost of such services increased significantly, the quality of the services provided deteriorated, our forecasts proved to be materially incorrect or capacity were consumed by our competitors.

We rely on third parties to provide corporate infrastructure services necessary forthe operation of our business. Any failure of one or more of our vendors to providethese services could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We rely on third-party vendors to provide critical corporate infrastructure services, including, among other things, certain services related to accounting, billing, human resources, information technology, or IT, network development and network monitoring. We depend on these vendors to ensure that our corporate infrastructure will consistently meet our business requirements. The ability of these third-party vendors to successfully provide reliable, high quality services is subject to technical and operational uncertainties that are beyond our control. While we may be entitled to damages if our vendors fail to perform under their agreements with us, our agreements with these vendors limit the amount of damages we may receive. In addition, we do not know whether we will be able to collect on any award of damages or that any such damages would be sufficient to cover the actual costs we would incur as a result of any vendor's failure to perform under its agreement with us. Any failure of our corporate infrastructure could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Upon expiration or termination of any of our agreements with third-party vendors, we may not be able to replace the services provided to us in a timely manner or on terms and conditions, including service levels and cost, that are favorable to us and a transition from one vendor to another vendor could subject us to operational delays and inefficiencies until the transition is complete.

Our gross margin is dependent on a number of factors, including our product mix, customer mix, commodity prices andlevel of capacity utilization.

Our gross margin is highly dependent on product mix, with proprietary products and products sold into our industrial and automotive target market typically providing higher gross margin than other products. A shift in sales mix away from our higher margin products could adversely affect our future gross margin percentages. In addition, OEMs are becoming increasingly price conscious when they design semiconductors from third party suppliers into their products. This sensitivity, combined with large OEMs' purchasing power, can lead to intense price competition among competing suppliers, which may require us to decrease our prices in order to win a design with an OEM customer. This can, in turn, adversely affect our gross margin. Our margin may also be affected by fluctuations in commodity prices, either directly in the price of the raw materials we buy, or as a result of prices increases passed on to us by our suppliers. Many commodities prices, including those of gold and fuel, have risen significantly in recent months. We do not hedge our exposure to commodity prices and continued increases in commodities prices may adversely affect our gross margin.

Our gross margin is also affected by the timing and amount of our non-product revenue, including non-refundable payments from customers for research and development projects during product development and intellectual property-related revenue such as licensing royalty payments and revenues from sales of intellectual property. Our non-product revenue is generally high margin, but fluctuates significantly from quarter to quarter.

In addition, semiconductor manufacturing requires significant capital investment, leading to high fixed costs, including depreciation expense. Although we outsource a significant portion of our manufacturing activities, we do retain some semiconductor fabrication facilities. We are making substantial capital investment in our Fort Collins, Colorado manufacturing facility to support anticipated growth in sales of our proprietary products, particularly for our wireless target market, and leverage our fixed costs. We may not realize the benefit we anticipate from this investment. If we are unable to utilize our owned fabrication facilities at a high level, the fixed costs associated with these facilities, such as depreciation expense, will not be fully absorbed, resulting in higher average unit costs and lower gross margins. In the past, we have experienced periods where our gross margins declined due to, among other things, reduced factory utilization resulting from reduced customer demand, reduced selling prices and a change in product mix towards lower margin devices. Increased competition and the existence of product alternatives, more complex engineering requirements, lower demand and other factors may lead to further price erosion, lower revenues and lower margins for us in the future.

37

Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adverselyaffected by the political and economic conditions of the countries in which weconduct business and other factors related to our international operations.

We sell our products throughout the world. In addition, as at April 29, 2012, approximately 66% of our employees are located outside of the United States. Multiple factors relating to our international operations and to particular countries in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These factors include:

• changes in political, regulatory, legal or economic conditions;

• restrictive governmental actions, such as restrictions on the transfer or repatriation of funds and foreign investments and trade protection measures, including export duties and quotas and customs duties and tariffs;

• disruptions of capital and trading markets;

• changes in import or export licensing requirements;

• transportation delays;

• civil disturbances or political instability;

• geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism, war or political or military coups;

• changes in labor standards;

• limitations on our ability under local laws to protect our intellectual property;

• nationalization of businesses and expropriation of assets;

• changes in tax laws;

• currency fluctuations, which may result in our products becoming too expensive for foreign customers or foreign-sourced materials and services becoming more expensive for us; and

• difficulty in obtaining distribution and support.

A significant legal risk associated with conducting business internationally is compliance with various and differing anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations of the countries in which we do business, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act and similar laws in China. In addition, the anti-corruption laws in various countries are constantly evolving and may, in some cases, conflict with each other. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct prohibit us and our employees from offering or giving anything of value to a government official for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business and from engaging in unethical business practices. However, there can be no assurance that all of our employees or agents will refrain from acting in violation of this and our related anti-corruption policies and procedures. Any such violation could have a material adverse effect on our business.

A majority of our products are produced and sourced in Asia, including in China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand. Any conflict or uncertainty in these countries, including due to political or civil unrest, public health or safety concerns or natural disasters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if the government of any country in which our products are manufactured or sold sets technical standards for products manufactured in or imported into their country that are not widely shared, it may lead certain of our customers to suspend imports of their products into that country, require manufacturers in that country to manufacture products with different technical standards and disrupt cross-border manufacturing relationships which, in each case, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our subsidiaries may require future equity-related financing, and any capital contributions to certain of our subsidiaries may require the approval of the relevant authorities in the jurisdiction in which the subsidiary is incorporated. The approvals are required from the investment commissions or similar agency of the particular jurisdiction and relate to any initial or additional equity investment by foreign entities in local corporations. Our failure to obtain the required approvals and our resulting inability to provide such equity-related financing or capital contributions could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we or our contract manufacturers suffer loss or significant damage to our factories, facilities or distributionsystem due to catastrophe, our operations could be seriously harmed.

Our factories, facilities and distribution system, and those of our contract manufacturers, are subject to risk of catastrophic loss due to fire, flood, earthquake or other natural or man-made disasters. The majority of our facilities and those of our contract manufacturers are located in the Pacific Rim region, a region with above average seismic and severe weather activity. In addition, our research and development personnel are concentrated in a few locations, primarily Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Fort Collins, Colorado and San Jose, California, with the expertise of the personnel at each such location tending to be

38

focused on one or two specific areas. Any catastrophic natural disaster in those regions or catastrophic loss or significant damage to any of our facilities or those of our contract manufacturers in those regions would likely disrupt our operations, delay production, shipments and revenue. Such events could also result in significant expenses to repair or replace our affected facilities, and in some instances could significantly curtail our research and development efforts in a particular product area or target market. Any catastrophic loss at our Fort Collins, Colorado, San Jose, California, or Singapore facilities would materially and adversely affect our business.

If the tax incentive or tax holiday arrangements we have negotiated in Singapore andother jurisdictions change or cease to be in effect or applicable, or if ourassumptions and interpretations regarding tax laws and incentive or holidayarrangements prove to be incorrect, the amount of corporate income taxes we have topay could significantly increase.

We have structured our operations to maximize the benefit from various tax incentives and tax holidays extended to us in various jurisdictions to encourage investment or employment. For example, we have obtained several tax incentives from the Singapore Economic Development Board, an agency of the Government of Singapore, which provide that certain classes of income we earn in Singapore are subject to tax holidays or reduced rates of Singapore income tax. Each such tax incentive is separate and distinct from the others, and may be granted, withheld, extended, modified, truncated, complied with or terminated independently without any effect on the other incentives. In order to retain these tax benefits in Singapore, we must meet certain operating conditions specific to each incentive relating to, among other things, maintenance of a treasury function, a corporate headquarters function, specified intellectual property activities and specified manufacturing activities in Singapore. Some of these operating conditions are subject to phase-in periods through 2015. The Singapore tax incentives are presently scheduled to expire at various dates generally between 2014 and 2025. Absent such tax incentives, the corporate income tax rate in Singapore that would otherwise apply to us would be 17%. For the fiscal years ended October 30, 2011, October 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, the effect of all these tax incentives, in the aggregate, was to reduce the overall provision for income taxes from what it otherwise would have been in such year by approximately $82 million, $63 million and $17 million, respectively. The tax incentives that we have negotiated in other jurisdictions are also subject to our compliance with various operating and other conditions. If we cannot or elect not to comply with the operating conditions included in any particular tax incentive, we will lose the related tax benefits. In such event, we could be required to refund material tax benefits previously realized by us with respect to that incentive and, depending on the incentive at issue, could likely be required to modify our operational structure and tax strategy. Any such modified structure or strategy may not be as beneficial to us from an income tax expense or operational perspective as the benefits provided under the present tax concession arrangements.

Our interpretations and conclusions regarding the tax incentives are not binding on any taxing authority, and if our assumptions about tax and other laws are incorrect or if these tax incentives are substantially modified or rescinded we could suffer material adverse tax and other financial consequences, which would increase our expenses, reduce our profitability and adversely affect our cash flows. In addition, taxable income in any jurisdiction is dependent upon acceptance of our operational practices and intercompany transfer pricing by local tax authorities as being on an arm's length basis. Due to inconsistencies in application of the arm's length standard among taxing authorities, as well as lack of adequate treaty-based protection, transfer pricing challenges by tax authorities could, if successful, substantially increase our income tax expense.We are subject to, and are under, audit in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional income tax against us. Although we believe our tax positions are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits could be materially different from our recorded income tax provisions and accruals. The ultimate results of an audit could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made.

The enactment of legislation implementing changes in U.S. taxation of internationalbusiness activities or the adoption of other tax reform policies could materiallyimpact our financial position and results of operations.

Tax bills are introduced from time to time to reform U.S. taxation of international business activities. Depending on the final form of legislation enacted, if any, these consequences may be significant for us due to the large scale of our international business activities. If any of these proposals are enacted into legislation, they could have material adverse consequences on the amount of tax we pay and thereby on our financial position and results of operations.

We may not realize the full benefits of our research and development grants.

We have accepted research and development grants, the receipt and amount of which are subject to our satisfaction of certain terms and conditions. During the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012, we recorded an aggregate of $4 million in credits to research and development expense and $1 million as a deferred credit for capital expenditures pursuant to these grants. During fiscal year 2011, we recorded an aggregate of $1 million in credits to research and development expense and $1 million as a deferred credit for capital expenditures pursuant to these grants. If we cannot or elect not to satisfy the terms and conditions of any of these grants, expenses incurred in respect of the relevant research and development projects will not be approved for reimbursement, we may be required to return amounts previously paid to us under the grants and further grants may not be available to us in the future.

39

We may pursue acquisitions, dispositions, investments and joint ventures, which couldaffect our results of operations.

We may make acquisitions of, and investments in, businesses that offer complementary products, services and technologies, augment our market coverage, or enhance our technological capabilities. We may also enter into strategic alliances or joint ventures to achieve these goals. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify suitable acquisition, investment, alliance, or joint venture opportunities or that we will be able to consummate any such transactions or relationships on terms and conditions acceptable to us, or that such transactions or relationships will be successful.

These transactions or any other acquisitions or dispositions involve risks and uncertainties. For example, the integration of acquired businesses may not be successful and could result in disruption to other parts of our business. In addition, the integration may require that we incur significant restructuring charges, including as a result of streamlining, or divesting non-core portions of, acquired businesses. To integrate acquired businesses, we must implement our management information systems, operating systems and internal controls, and assimilate and manage the personnel of the acquired operations. The difficulties of these integrations may be further complicated by such factors as the size of the business or entity acquired, geographic distances, lack of experience operating in the geographic market or industry sector of the acquired business, delays and challenges associated with integrating the business with our existing businesses, diversion of management's attention from daily operations of the business, potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired business, the potential for deficiencies in internal controls at the acquired or combined business, performance problems with the acquired business' technology, difficulties in entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience, exposure to unanticipated liabilities of the acquired business, insufficient revenues to offset increased expenses associated with the acquisition, and our potential inability to achieve the growth prospects and synergies expected from any such acquisition. Even when an acquired business has already developed and marketed products, there can be no assurance that product enhancements will be made in a timely fashion or that all pre-acquisition due diligence will have identified all material issues that might arise with respect to such acquired business.

Any acquisition may also cause us to assume liabilities and ongoing lawsuits, acquire goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing and potential impairment charges, incur amortization expense related to certain intangible assets, increase our expenses and working capital requirements, and subject us to litigation, which would reduce our return on invested capital. In addition, if the businesses or products lines that we acquire have a different pricing or cost structure than we do, such acquisitions may adversely affect our profitability and reduce our overall margin. Failure to manage and successfully integrate the acquisitions we make or to improve margins of the acquired businesses and products could materially harm our business, operating results and margins.

Any future acquisitions may require additional debt or equity financing, which, in the case of debt financing, would increase our leverage and potentially affect our credit ratings, and in the case of equity financing, would be dilutive to our existing shareholders. Any downgrades in our credit ratings associated with an acquisition could adversely affect our ability to borrow by resulting in more restrictive borrowing terms. As a result of the foregoing, we also may not be able to complete acquisitions or other strategic transactions in the future to the same extent as in the past, or at all. These and other factors could harm our ability to achieve anticipated levels of profitability at acquired operations or realize other anticipated benefits of an acquisition, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is subject to various governmental regulations, and compliance withthese regulations may cause us to incur significant expenses. If we fail to maintaincompliance with applicable regulations, we may be forced to recall products and ceasetheir manufacture and distribution, and we could be subject to civil or criminalpenalties.

Our business is subject to various significant international and U.S. laws and other legal requirements, including packaging, product content, labor and import/export regulations. These regulations are complex, change frequently and have generally become more stringent over time. We may be required to incur significant expenses to comply with these regulations or to remedy violations of these regulations. Any failure by us to comply with applicable government regulations could result in cessation of our operations or portions of our operations, product recalls or impositions of fines and restrictions on our ability to conduct our operations. In addition, because many of our products are regulated or sold into regulated industries, we must comply with additional regulations in marketing our products.

Our products and operations are also subject to the rules of industrial standards bodies, like the International Standards Organization, as well as regulation by other agencies, such as the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. If we fail to adequately address any of these rules or regulations, our business could be harmed.

We must conform the manufacture and distribution of our semiconductors to various laws and adapt to regulatory requirements in all countries as these requirements change. If we fail to comply with these requirements in the manufacture or distribution of our products, we could be required to pay civil penalties, face criminal prosecution and, in some cases, be prohibited from distributing our products commercially until the products or component substances are brought into compliance.

40

We are subject to environmental, health and safety laws, which could increase ourcosts, restrict our operations and require expenditures that could have a materialadverse affect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to a variety of international and U.S. laws and other legal requirements relating to the use, disposal, clean-up of and human exposure to, hazardous materials. Any failure by us to comply with environmental, health and safety requirements could result in the limitation or suspension of production or subject us to future liabilities in excess of our reserves. In addition, compliance with environmental, health and safety requirements could restrict our ability to expand our facilities or require us to acquire costly pollution control equipment, incur other significant expenses or modify our manufacturing processes. In the event of the discovery of new contamination, additional requirements with respect to existing contamination, or the imposition of other cleanup obligations for which we are responsible, we may be required to take remedial or other measures which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We also face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new requirements relating to the materials composition of our products, including the restrictions on lead and certain other substances in electronics that apply to specified electronics products sold in the European Union as of July 1, 2006 under the Restriction of Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. Other countries, such as the United States, China and Japan, have enacted or may enact laws or regulations similar to the EU legislation. Other environmental regulations may require us to re-engineer our products to utilize components that are more environmentally compatible. Such re-engineering and component substitution may result in excess inventory or other additional costs and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

In addition to the costs of complying with environmental, health and safety requirements, we may in the future incur costs defending against environmental litigation brought by government agencies and private parties. We may be defendants in lawsuits brought by parties in the future alleging environmental damage, personal injury or property damage. A significant judgment against us could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In the last few years, there has been increased media scrutiny and associated reports focusing on a potential link between working in semiconductor manufacturing clean room environments and certain illnesses, primarily different types of cancers. Regulatory agencies and industry associations have begun to study the issue to see if any actual correlation exists. Because we utilize clean rooms, we may become subject to liability claims. In addition, these reports may also affect our ability to recruit and retain employees.

We cannot predict:

• changes in environmental or health and safety laws or regulations;

• the manner in which environmental or health and safety laws or regulations will be enforced, administered or interpreted;

• our ability to enforce and collect under indemnity agreements and insurance policies relating to environmental liabilities; or

• the cost of compliance with future environmental or health and safety laws or regulations or the costs associated with any future environmental claims, including the cost of clean-up of currently unknown environmental conditions.

New regulations related to “conflict minerals” may force us to incur additional expenses, may make our supply chain more complex and may result in damage to our reputation with customers.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, requires the SEC to establish new disclosure and reporting requirements for those companies who use certain minerals and metals mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries in their products, known as conflict minerals, whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. When these new requirements are implemented, they could adversely affect the sourcing, availability and pricing of minerals used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, including our products. In addition, we will incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of any of the relevant minerals and metals used in our products. Since our supply chain is complex, we may be unable to sufficiently verify the origins for these minerals and metals used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement, which may harm our reputation. In such event, we may also face difficulties in satisfying customers who require that all of the components of our products are certified as conflict mineral free.

We have taken significant restructuring charges in the past and may need to takematerial restructuring charges in the future.

We have pursued a number of restructuring initiatives in the past, designed to reduce costs and increase revenue across our operations, in large part due to the global economic downturn and related decline in demand for our customers' products. These

41

initiatives included significant workforce reductions in certain areas as we realigned our business, establishing certain operations closer in location to our global customers, evaluating functions more efficiently performed through partnerships or other outside relationships and steps to reduce our overhead costs.

We may be required to take additional charges in the future as we continue to evaluate our operations and cost structures relative to general economic conditions, market demands, our cost competitiveness, our geographic footprint as it relates to our customers' production requirements and our research and development focus. The timing or amount of any future restructuring charges is uncertain. Additionally, there are other potential risks associated with our restructurings that could adversely affect us, such as delays encountered with the finalization and implementation of the restructuring activities, work stoppages, and the failure to achieve targeted cost savings. If we are required to take additional restructuring charges in the future, our operating results, financial condition, and cash flows may be adversely impacted.

We rely on third-party distributors and manufacturers' representatives, as well asour employee sales representatives, and the failure of these distributors or representatives toperform as expected could reduce our future sales.

In addition to selling products through our employee sales representatives, we also rely on distributors and manufacturers' representatives to sell our products to our customers. This is particularly the case in markets where we do not have a significant physical presence and new markets that we are seeking to enter. We are unable to predict the extent to which our distributors and manufacturers' representatives will be successful in marketing and selling our products. Moreover, many of our distributors and manufacturers' representatives also market and sell competing products. Our relationships with our representatives and distributors may be terminated by either party at any time. In June 2011, we reduced the number of our global, full-line distributors, by changing one of them to a regional, full-line distributor. We continue to evaluate our sales and distribution strategies and may make further changes in the future. Our future performance will depend, in part, on our ability to attract additional distributors or manufacturers' representatives that will be able to market and support our products effectively, especially in markets where we have not previously distributed our products, and on our ability to effectively manage distribution efforts by our remaining global, full-line distributors. If we cannot retain our current distributors or manufacturers' representatives, recruit additional or replacement distributors or manufacturers' representatives, or effectively manage changes to our sales and distributions strategies, our sales and operating results will be harmed.

The average selling prices of products in our markets have historically decreasedrapidly and will likely do so in the future, which could harm our revenues and grossprofits.

The products we develop and sell are used for high volume applications. As a result, the prices of those products have historically decreased rapidly. Gross profits on our products may be negatively affected by, among other things, pricing pressures from our customers, and the proportion of sales of our wireless and other products into consumer application markets, which are highly competitive and cost sensitive. In the past, we have reduced the average selling prices of our products in anticipation of future competitive pricing pressures, new product introductions by us or our competitors and other factors. In addition, some of our customer agreements provide for volume-based pricing and product pricing roadmaps, which can also reduce the average selling prices of our products over time. Our gross profits and financial results will suffer if we are unable to offset any reductions in our average selling prices by increasing our sales volumes, reducing manufacturing costs, or developing new and higher value-added products on a timely basis.

We are required to assess our internal control over financial reporting on an annualbasis and any adverse findings from such assessment could result in a loss ofinvestor confidence in our financial reports, significant expenses to remediate anyinternal control deficiencies and ultimately have an adverse effect on our shareprice.

We are required to assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting annually, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Even though, as at October 30, 2011, we concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective, we need to maintain our processes and systems and adapt them as our business grows and changes. This continuous process of maintaining and adapting our internal controls and complying with Section 404 is expensive, time-consuming and requires significant management attention. We cannot be certain that our internal control measures will continue to provide adequate control over our financial processes and reporting and ensure compliance with Section 404. Furthermore, as we grow our business or acquire other businesses, our internal controls may become more complex and we may require significantly more resources to ensure they remain effective. Failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, either in our existing business or in businesses that we may acquire, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. If we or our independent registered public accounting firm identify material weaknesses in our internal controls, the disclosure of that fact, even if quickly remedied, may cause investors to lose confidence in our financial statements and the trading price of our ordinary shares may decline.

Remediation of a material weakness could require us to incur significant expense and if we fail to remedy any material weakness, our financial statements may be inaccurate, our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis

42

may be adversely affected, our access to the capital markets may be restricted, the trading price of our ordinary shares may decline, and we may be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, including the SEC or The Nasdaq Global Select Market. We may also be required to restate our financial statements from prior periods.

A breach of our security systems may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our security systems are designed to maintain the physical security of our facilities and protect our customers', suppliers' and employees' confidential information. Accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access by third parties to our facilities or our information systems or the existence of computer viruses in our data or software could expose us to a risk of information loss and misappropriation of proprietary and confidential information. Any theft or misuse of such information could result in, among other things, unfavorable publicity, damage to our reputation, difficulty in marketing our products, allegations by our customers that we have not performed our contractual obligations, litigation by affected parties and possible financial obligations for liabilities and damages related to the theft or misuse of such information, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, profitability and financial condition.  Since the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and are often not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures.

Risks Relating to Investments in Singapore Companies

It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of U.S. courts for civil liabilities underU.S. federal securities laws against us, our directors or officers in Singapore.

We are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Singapore, and certain of our officers and directors are resident outside the United States. Moreover, a majority of our consolidated assets are located outside the United States. Although we are incorporated outside the United States, we have agreed to accept service of process in the United States through our agent designated for that purpose. Nevertheless, since a majority of the consolidated assets owned by us are located outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States against us may not be collectible within the United States.

There is no treaty between the United States and Singapore providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any federal or state court in the United States based on civil liability, whether or not predicated solely upon the federal securities laws, would, therefore, not be automatically enforceable in Singapore. There is doubt whether a Singapore court may impose civil liability on us or our directors and officers who reside in Singapore in a suit brought in the Singapore courts against us or such persons with respect to a violation solely of the federal securities laws of the United States, unless the facts surrounding such a violation would constitute or give rise to a cause of action under Singapore law. Consequently, it may be difficult for investors to enforce against us, our directors or our officers in Singapore judgments obtained in the United States, which are predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States.

We are incorporated in Singapore and our shareholders may have more difficulty inprotecting their interest than they would as shareholders of a corporationincorporated in the United States, and we may have more difficulty attracting and retaining qualified board members and executives.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association and by the laws governing corporations incorporated in Singapore. The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of the members of our board of directors under Singapore law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the United States. Therefore, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interest in connection with actions taken by our management or members of our board of directors than they would as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States.

In addition, being a public company incorporated in Singapore may make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on committees of our Board, and qualified executive officers.

For a limited period of time, our directors have general authority to allot and issue new ordinary shares on terms and conditions as may be determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion.

Under Singapore law, we may only allot and issue new ordinary shares with the prior approval of our shareholders in a general meeting. At our 2012 AGM, our shareholders provided our directors with the general authority to allot and issue any number of new ordinary shares until the earlier of (i) the conclusion of our 2013 AGM, (ii) the expiration of the period within which the next annual general meeting is required to be held (i.e., within 15 months from the conclusion of the last general meeting) or (iii) the subsequent revocation or modification of such general authority by our shareholders acting at a duly noticed and convened meeting. Subject to the general authority to allot and issue new ordinary shares provided by our shareholders, the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and our memorandum and articles of association, our board of

43

directors may allot and issue new ordinary shares on terms and conditions as they may think fit to impose. Any additional issuances of new ordinary shares by our directors may adversely impact the market price of our ordinary shares.

Risks Relating to Owning Our Ordinary Shares

At times, our share price has been volatile and it may fluctuate substantially in thefuture, which could result in substantial losses for our investors.

The trading price of our ordinary shares has, at times, fluctuated significantly. The trading price of our ordinary shares could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to many risk factors listed in this “Risk Factors” section, and others, many of which are beyond our control, including:

• actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial condition and operating results;

• overall conditions in the semiconductor market and general economic and market conditions;

• addition or loss of significant customers;

• changes in laws or regulations applicable to our products;

• actual or anticipated changes in our growth rate relative to our competitors;

• announcements of technological innovations or competitive products by us or our competitors;

• announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

• additions or departures of key personnel;

• issuance of new or updated research or reports by securities analysts;

• fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;

• disputes or other developments related to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and our ability to obtain intellectual property protection for our technologies;

• announcement of, or expectation of additional financing efforts;

• sales of our ordinary shares by us or our shareholders;

• share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares; and

• changes in our dividend policy.

Furthermore, the stock markets have recently experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies, including ours. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions, interest rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may negatively impact the market price of our ordinary shares. You may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management's attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.

Future sales of our ordinary shares in the public market could cause our share priceto fall.

Sales of a substantial number of our ordinary shares in the public market, including by members of our management, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our ordinary shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities.

As of May 25, 2012, approximately 21.5 million outstanding ordinary shares are subject to the contractual transfer restrictions in our Second Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement. The Company and the shareholders party to that agreement have in the past and may in future decide to waive these transfer restrictions.

As of May 25, 2012, holders of approximately 21.5 million ordinary shares are entitled to rights with respect to registration of such shares under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement with us. These holders have exercised their registration rights several times since our since our initial public offering, or IPO, in August 2009 and if such holders, by exercising their registration rights or otherwise, continue to sell a large number of shares, they could adversely affect the market price for our ordinary shares. If we register the sale of additional shares to raise capital and are required to include shares held by these holders in such registration pursuant to the exercise of their registration rights,

44

our ability to raise capital may be impaired.

In addition, shares issued pursuant to our equity incentive plans, including such shares issued to members of our management, may be freely sold in the public market upon vesting and issuance, subject to the restrictions provided under the terms of the plan and option agreement under which they were issued, applicable securities laws and our insider trading policy.

There can be no assurance that we will continue to declare cash dividends or repurchase shares.

Our Board adopted a dividend policy pursuant to which the Company will pay quarterly dividends on our ordinary shares and, following our 2012 AGM on April 4, 2012, our Board also re-approved a program to repurchase up to 15 million of the Company's ordinary shares, which authorization will expire at our 2013 AGM. The declaration and payment of any future dividend is subject to the approval of our Board and our dividend policy could change at any time. Similarly, our share repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time prior to its expiration at the 2013 AGM. There can be no assurance that we will declare cash dividends or repurchase shares in the future in any particular amounts, or at all. Furthermore, we may declare dividends as interim dividends, which are wholly provisional under Singapore law and may be revoked by our Board at any time prior to the payment thereof. The payment of cash dividends is restricted by applicable law and our corporate structure. Pursuant to Singapore law and our articles of association, no dividends may be paid except out of our profits. Also, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay cash dividends on our ordinary shares and to repurchase our shares may be limited by restrictions on our ability to obtain sufficient funds through dividends from subsidiaries, including restrictions under the terms of our credit agreement.

Future dividends and share repurchases, if any, their timing and amount, as well as the relative allocation of cash between dividends and share repurchases, may be affected by, among other factors: our views on potential future capital requirements for strategic transactions, including acquisitions; earnings levels; contractual restrictions; cash position and overall financial condition; and changes to our business model. In addition, the amount we spend and the number of shares we are able to repurchase under our share repurchase program may further be affected by a number of other factors, including the share price and blackout periods in which we are restricted from repurchasing shares. A reduction in, or elimination of, our dividend payments and/or share repurchases could have a negative effect on our share price.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divertmanagement's attention.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, listing requirements of The Nasdaq Global Select Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations increases our legal and financial compliance costs, places significant demands on our systems, resources and management. As a result, management's attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also need to hire more employees in the future, which will increase our costs and expenses.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, such as the Dodd-Frank Act, are creating uncertainty for public companies, further increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management's time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed.

Singapore corporate law may impede a takeover of our company by a third-party, whichcould adversely affect the value of our ordinary shares.

The Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers contains provisions that may delay, deter or prevent a future takeover or change in control of our company for so long as we remain a public company with more than 50 shareholders and net tangible assets of S$5 million or more. Any person acquiring an interest, whether by a series of transactions over a period of time or not, either on their own or together with parties acting in concert with such person, in 30% or more of our voting shares, or, if such person holds, either on their own or together with parties acting in concert with such person, between 30% and 50% (both inclusive) of our voting shares, and such person (or parties acting in concert with such person) acquires additional voting shares representing more than 1% of our voting shares in any six-month period, must, except with the consent of the Securities Industry Council in Singapore, extend a mandatory takeover offer for the remaining voting shares in accordance with the provisions of the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers. While the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers seeks to ensure equality of treatment among shareholders, its provisions may discourage or prevent certain types of transactions

45

involving an actual or threatened change of control of our company. These legal requirements may impede or delay a takeover of our company by a third-party, which could adversely affect the value of our ordinary shares.

Our actual operating results may differ significantly from our guidance.

From time to time, we release guidance regarding our future performance that represents our management's estimates as of the date of release. This guidance, which consists of forward-looking statements, is prepared by our management and is qualified by, and subject to, the assumptions and the other information contained or referred to in the release. Our guidance is not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and neither our independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent expert or outside party compiles or examines the guidance and, accordingly, no such person expresses any opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto.

Guidance is based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, is inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to future business decisions, some of which will change. We generally state possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed but are not intended to represent that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. The principal reason that we release this data is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business outlook with analysts and investors. We do not accept any responsibility for any projections or reports published by any such persons.

Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions of the guidance furnished by us will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, our guidance is only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date of release. Actual results will vary from the guidance and the variations may be material. Investors should also recognize that the reliability of any forecasted financial data diminishes the farther in the future that the data is forecast. In light of the foregoing, investors are urged to put the guidance in context and not to place undue reliance on it.

Any failure to successfully implement our operating strategy or the occurrence of any of the events or circumstances set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q could result in the actual operating results being different than the guidance, and such differences may be adverse and material.

46

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There were no sales of unregistered securities during the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012.

Issuer Repurchase of Equity Securities

The following table presents details of our share repurchases during the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012:

	Total Number of	Average Price		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
Period	Shares Purchased	Paid per Share		Programs (1)	Programs
					(in millions)
January 30, 2012 - February 26, 2012	185,020	$	34.41	185,020	$	322
February 27, 2012 - March 25, 2012	—	$	—	—	$	322
March 26, 2012 - April 29, 2012	—	$	—	—	$	—	(2)
Total	185,020	$	34.41	185,020

___________________________________

(1) All share repurchases during the period from January 29, 2012 to April 29, 2012 were made in open market transactions, pursuant to our publicly announced 2011 share repurchase program. All repurchases were made in accordance with Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act.

(2)    The 2011 share repurchase program expired at the Company's 2012 AGM on April 4, 2012.

On April 5, 2012, we announced that our Board had authorized the Company to repurchase up to 15 million of its ordinary shares. This replaces the 2011 share repurchase program announced by the Company on June 9, 2011, which expired at the 2012 Annual General Meeting, under which the Company was authorized to repurchase up to 15 million of its ordinary shares, not to exceed $15 million, in the aggregate. Shares repurchases under the 2012 share repurchase program, if any, will be made in the open market at such times and in such amounts as the Company deems appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, market conditions and applicable legal requirements. The 2012 share repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares and may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. The 2012 share repurchase program, will expire at the Company's 2013 AGM, unless earlier terminated. As of April 29, 2012, no shares had been purchased under the 2012 share repurchase program.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

Dividend

On June 6, 2012, the Board declared an interim cash dividend on the Company’s ordinary shares of $0.15 per share, payable on June 29, 2012 to shareholders of record at the close of business (5:00 p.m.), Eastern Time, on June 18, 2012.

Item 6. Exhibits

		Incorporated by Reference Herein
Exhibit Number	Description	Form	Filing Date	Filed Herewith
3.1	Memorandum and Articles of Association	Avago Technologies Limited Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 001-34428).	August 14, 2009

47

		Incorporated by Reference Herein
Exhibit Number	Description	Form	Filing Date	Filed Herewith
4.1	Second Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement, dated August 11, 2009, among Avago Technologies Limited, Silver Lake Partners II Cayman, L.P., Silver Lake Technology Investors II Cayman, L.P., Integral Capital Partners VII, L.P., KKR Millennium Fund (Overseas), Limited Partnership, KKR European Fund, Limited Partnership, KKR European Fund II, Limited Partnership, KKR Partners (International), Limited Partnership, Capstone Equity Investors LLC, Avago Investment Partners, Limited Partnership, Bali Investments S.àr.l., Seletar Investments Pte Ltd, Geyser Investment Pte. Ltd. and certain other Persons	Avago Technologies Limited Current Report on Form 8-K (Commission File No. 001-34428).	August 14, 2009
4.2	Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement and Waiver Under the Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 20, 2011, among Avago Technologies Limited, Silver Lake Partners II Cayman, L.P., Silver Lake Technology Investors II Cayman, L.P., Integral Capital Partners VII, L.P., KKR Millennium Fund (Overseas), Limited Partnership, KKR European Fund, Limited Partnership, KKR European Fund II, Limited Partnership, KKR Partners (International), Limited Partnership, Capstone Equity Investors LLC, Avago Investment Partners, Limited Partnership, Seletar Investments Pte Ltd, Geyser Investment Pte. Ltd. and certain other Persons		March 8, 2012
4.3	Second Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Shareholder Agreement, dated January 20, 2012, among Avago Technologies Limited, Silver Lake Partners II Cayman, L.P., Silver Lake Technology Investors II Cayman, L.P., KKR Millennium Fund (Overseas), Limited Partnership, KKR European Fund, Limited Partnership, KKR European Fund II, Limited Partnership, KKR Partners (International), Limited Partnership, Capstone Equity Investors LLC, Avago Investment Partners, Limited Partnership, and certain other Persons		March 8, 2012
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002			X
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002			X

48

		Incorporated by Reference Herein
Exhibit Number	Description	Form	Filing Date	Filed Herewith
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002			X
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002			X
101.INS†	XBRL Instance Document			X
101.SCH†	XBRL Schema Document			X
101.CAL†	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document			X
101.DEF†	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document			X
101.LAB†	XBRL Labels Linkbase Document			X
101.PRE†	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document			X

________________________________

† Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011, (ii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, (iii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 and (iv) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

49

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
By:	/s/ Douglas R. Bettinger
	Douglas R. Bettinger
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: June 8, 2012

50

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Hock E. Tan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Avago Technologies Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Hock E. Tan  

Hock E. Tan 

Chief Executive Officer 

Date: June 8, 2012

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas R. Bettinger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Avago Technologies Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Douglas R. Bettinger  

Douglas R. Bettinger 

Chief Financial Officer 

Date: June 8, 2012

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Avago Technologies Limited (the “Company”) for the quarter ended April 29, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Hock E. Tan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	June 8, 2012	/s/ Hock E. Tan
		Hock E. Tan
		Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Avago Technologies Limited (the “Company”) for the quarter ended April 29, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas R. Bettinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	June 8, 2012	/s/ Douglas R. Bettinger
		Douglas R. Bettinger
		Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Share Repurchase Program and Dividends) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended	2 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		5 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Feb. 26, 2012	Apr. 29, 2012	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Oct. 30, 2011	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Apr. 04, 2012	Jun. 08, 2011
Shareholders Equity (Textuals) [Abstract]
Stock Repurchased, shares	0.2	0				2.8
Repurchase of shares in cash			$ 6			$ 85
Weighted average price per share			$ 34.41			$ 30.50
Cash dividend paid, per share			$ 0.13	$ 0.08
First interim cash dividend, total value			32	20		61	37
Stock Repurchase Program, Number of Shares Authorized to be Repurchased								15	15
Stock Repurchase Program Number Of Shares Authorized To Be Repurchased In Open Market Transactions								24.6
Stock Repurchase Program, Authorized Amount					$ 500

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended				6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012		May 01, 2011		Apr. 29, 2012		May 01, 2011		Oct. 30, 2011
Flextronics [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Net revenue	$ 0	[1]	$ 40	[1]	$ 0	[1]	$ 68	[1]
Wistron Corporation [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Net revenue	2	[2]	1	[2]	4	[2]	1	[2]
Receivables	1	[2]			1	[2]			1	[2]
KLA-Tencor [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Costs and operating expenses	1	[3]	0	[3]	2	[3]	0	[3]
Payables	1	[3]			1	[3]			0	[3]
Related Party Nine [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Costs and operating expenses	0	[4]	20	[4]	0	[4]	20	[4]
Related Party eSilicon [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Net revenue	1	[5]	0	[5]	1	[5]	0	[5]
Costs and operating expenses	0	[5]	0	[5]	0	[5]	0	[5]
Receivables	$ 1	[5]			$ 1	[5]			$ 0	[5]

[1] Amounts represent net revenue transactions with Flextronics through the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011. Flextronics ceased to be a related party after the second quarter of fiscal year 2011

[2] Amount for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 represents net revenue transactions for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011 only. Wistron Corporation became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011

[3] Amounts represent purchase transactions with KLA-Tencor for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and accounts payable balance as of April 29, 2012. KLA-Tencor became a related party during the first quarter of fiscal year 2012.

[4] Amounts represent transactions with WIN Semiconductor Corp. included in cost of products sold incurred during the period WIN Semiconductor Corp was a related party. WIN Semiconductor Corp. became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 and ceased being a related party during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011.

[5] Amounts represent net revenue and purchase transactions with eSilicon Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 and accounts receivable balance as of April 29, 2012. eSilicon Corporation became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2012.

XML

Income Taxes (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Provision for income taxes	$ 6	$ 2	$ 11	$ 3
Tax benefit, reinstatement of research and development tax credits				$ 3

XML

Goodwill And Intangible Assets (Details 2) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
Amortization of purchased intangible assets
Cost of products sold	$ 14	$ 14	$ 28	$ 28
Operating expenses	5	5	10	11
Total	$ 19	$ 19	$ 38	$ 39

XML

Commitments And Contingencies (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Changes in commitments

 The following table sets forth changes in our commitments as of April 29, 2012 for the fiscal periods noted (in millions).

	Total		2012 (remainder)		2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter
Purchase commitments	$	75	$	75	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Other Contractual Commitments	49		7		18		12		7		5		—		—

XML

Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	Nov. 01, 2009
Product Liability Contingency [Line Items]
Product Warranty Expense In Excess Of Insurance		$ 2
Product Warranty Expense	(2)
Product Warranty Accrual, Preexisting, Increase (Decrease)	$ 2

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Equity Incentive Award Plans) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012 years
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Additional Disclosures [Abstract]
Awards Available for Grant, Beginning Balance	10
Number Outstanding, Beginning Balance	19
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share, Beginning Balance	$ 17.93
Annual increase, Awards Available for Grant	6
Annual increase, Number Outstanding	0
Annual increase, Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 0
Granted, Awards available for grant	4
Granted, Number Outstanding	4
Granted, Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 35.13
Exercised, Number Outstanding	1
Exercised, Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 12.79
Cancelled, awards available for grant	1
Cancelled, Number Outstanding	1
Cancelled, Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 20.80
Awards Available for Grant, Ending Balance	13
Number Outstanding, Ending Balance	21
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share, Ending Balance	$ 21.47
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life, Ending Balance	6.53
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Ending Balance	$ 278
Vested, Number Outstanding	6
Vested, Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 13.11
Vested, Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life	5.87
Vested, Aggregate Intrinsic Value	127
Vested and expected to vest, Number Outstanding	19
Vested and expected to vest, Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 20.87
Vested and expected to vest, Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life	6.50
Vested and expected to vest, Aggregate Intrinsic Value	$ 267

XML

Fair Value (Details) (Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member], USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Apr. 29, 2012
Fair Value Measurement Using Quoted Prices In Active Market For Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	$ 624
Fair Value Measurement Using Quoted Prices In Active Market For Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Deferred Compensation Plan Liabilities [Member]
Liabilities
Liabilities measured at fair value	7	[1]
Fair Value Measurement Using Quoted Prices In Active Market For Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Time deposits [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	612	[2]
Fair Value Measurement Using Quoted Prices In Active Market For Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Investment Funds - Deferred Compensation Plan Assets [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	7	[3]
Fair Value Measurement Using Quoted Prices In Active Market For Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Bank acceptances [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	1	[3]
Fair Value Measurement Using Quoted Prices In Active Market For Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Available-for-sale securities [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	4	[4]
Portion at Fair Value, Fair Value Disclosure [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	624
Portion at Fair Value, Fair Value Disclosure [Member] | Deferred Compensation Plan Liabilities [Member]
Liabilities
Liabilities measured at fair value	7	[1]
Portion at Fair Value, Fair Value Disclosure [Member] | Time deposits [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	612	[2]
Portion at Fair Value, Fair Value Disclosure [Member] | Investment Funds - Deferred Compensation Plan Assets [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	7	[3]
Portion at Fair Value, Fair Value Disclosure [Member] | Bank acceptances [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	1	[3]
Portion at Fair Value, Fair Value Disclosure [Member] | Available-for-sale securities [Member]
Assets
Assets measured at fair value	$ 4	[4]

[1] Included in other current liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

[2] Included in cash and cash equivalents in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

[3] Included in other current assets in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

[4] Included in other long-term assets in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

XML

Segment Information (Details)	6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012 segment
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Number of Reportable Segments	1

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

There were no changes to goodwill during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012.

Intangible Assets

Amortizable purchased intangibles consist of the following (in millions):

	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value
As of April 29, 2012:
Purchased technology	$	728	$	(374	)	$	354
Customer and distributor relationships	257		(152		)	105
Other	4		(2		)	2
Total	$	989	$	(528	)	$	461
As of October 30, 2011:
Purchased technology	$	728	$	(346	)	$	382
Customer and distributor relationships	257		(142		)	115
Other	4		(2		)	2
Total	$	989	$	(490	)	$	499

The following table presents the amortization of purchased intangible assets (in millions):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Cost of products sold	$	14	$	14	$	28	$	28
Operating expenses	5		5		10		11
Total	$	19	$	19	$	38	$	39

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, we recorded $4 million in intangible assets with a weighted-average amortization period of 14 years in conjunction with an acquisition. See Note 3. “Acquisition.”

Based on the amount of intangible assets subject to amortization at April 29, 2012, the expected amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows (in millions):

Fiscal Year	Amount
2012 (remainder)	$	39
2013	77
2014	77
2015	76
2016	59
2017	49
Thereafter	84
	$	461

The weighted-average amortization periods remaining by intangible asset category as at April 29, 2012 were as follows (in years):

Amortizable intangible assets:
Purchased technology	8
Customer and distributor relationships	7
Other	22

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Significant Ranges of Outstanding and Exercisable Awards) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012 years
Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Outstanding Options	21
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	6.53
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 21.47
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Exercisable Options	6
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 13.11
0.00-5.00 [Member]
Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards
Exercise Prices, Minimum	$ 0.00
Exercise Prices, Maximum	$ 5.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Outstanding Options	2
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	3.76
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 4.99
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Exercisable Options	1
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 4.98
5.01-10.00 [Member]
Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards
Exercise Prices, Minimum	$ 5.01
Exercise Prices, Maximum	$ 10.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Outstanding Options	2
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	6.64
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 9.26
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Exercisable Options	1
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 9.17
10.01-15.00 [Member]
Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards
Exercise Prices, Minimum	$ 10.01
Exercise Prices, Maximum	$ 15.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Outstanding Options	5
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	6.20
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 12.10
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Exercisable Options	2
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 11.19
15.01-20.00 [Member]
Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards
Exercise Prices, Minimum	$ 15.01
Exercise Prices, Maximum	$ 20.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Outstanding Options	1
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	7.58
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 17.54
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Exercisable Options	0
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 17.72
20.01-25.00 [Member]
Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards
Exercise Prices, Minimum	$ 20.01
Exercise Prices, Maximum	$ 25.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Outstanding Options	3
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	8.25
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 20.53
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Exercisable Options	1
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 20.54
25.01-30.00 [Member]
Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards
Exercise Prices, Minimum	$ 25.01
Exercise Prices, Maximum	$ 30.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Outstanding Options	0
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	6.81
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 29.21
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Exercisable Options	0
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 28.52
30.01-35.00 [Member]
Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards
Exercise Prices, Minimum	$ 30.01
Exercise Prices, Maximum	$ 35.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Outstanding Options	4
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	5.99
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 32.74
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Exercisable Options	1
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 32.34
35.01-40.00 [Member]
Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards
Exercise Prices, Minimum	$ 35.01
Exercise Prices, Maximum	$ 40.00
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Outstanding Options	4
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	6.80
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 35.48
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range, Number of Exercisable Options	0
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share	$ 0.00

XML

Overview and Basis of Presentation Warranty (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	Oct. 30, 2011
Product Liability Contingency [Line Items]
Standard Product Warranty Accrual	$ 3	$ 6
Standard Product Warranty Accrual, Preexisting, Increase (Decrease)	$ (3)

XML

Overview and Basis of Presentation (Details Textuals) (USD $) Share data in Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended			6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012 Person	Oct. 30, 2011 Person	May 01, 2011 Person	Apr. 29, 2012 Person	May 01, 2011	Dec. 01, 2005
Fiscal period end				52- or 53-week
Purchase price of SPG Assets Acquired						$ 2,700,000,000
Number of customers accounted for 10% or more of net accounts receivable balance	2	2		2
Number of customers representing 10% or more of net revenue	1		0	0
Number of antidilutive shares excluded from computation of earnings per share	1		1	1
Unpaid purchases of property, plant and equipment		21,000,000		41,000,000
Payments of Financing Costs				$ 0	$ 2,000,000
Maximum [Member]
Number of antidilutive shares excluded from computation of earnings per share					1
Net accounts receivable [Member] | Major Customer One [Member]
Concentraton of credit risk, percentage of total balance	17.00%	15.00%		17.00%
Net accounts receivable [Member] | Major Customer, Two [Member]
Concentraton of credit risk, percentage of total balance	11.00%	10.00%		11.00%
Net revenue [Member]
Concentraton of credit risk, percentage of total balance			10.00%		10.00%
Net revenue [Member] | Quarter To Date [Member]
Concentraton of credit risk, percentage of total balance	16.00%			16.00%
Net revenue [Member] | Year To Date [Member]
Concentraton of credit risk, percentage of total balance	17.00%			17.00%

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Share Based Compensation Expense) (Details Textuals) (USD $) In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected Life Of Options And Implied Volatility Description			term of 180 days or greater measured over the last three months
Total compensation cost related to unvested options	$ 132		$ 132
Weighted average period over which unrecognized compensation is expected to be recognized for equity awards (years)			3
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted-average fair values of options granted	$ 14.46	$ 12.30	$ 14.55	$ 12.21
Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted-average fair value, other than options	$ 12.94	$ 7.86	$ 12.84	$ 7.03
Total compensation cost related to unvested options	1		1
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted-average fair value, other than options	$ 35.49		$ 35.22	$ 32.39
Grants in period, equity instruments other than options				0
Total compensation cost related to unvested options	$ 21		$ 21
Weighted average period over which unrecognized compensation is expected to be recognized for equity awards (years)			3

XML

Inventory (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Apr. 29, 2012	Oct. 30, 2011
Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]
Finished goods	$ 53	$ 48
Work-in-process	106	106
Raw materials	59	40
Total inventory	$ 218	$ 194	[1]

[1] Amounts as of October 30, 2011 have been derived from audited financial statements as of that date.

XML

Acquisition (Details) (U.S. Based Company [Member], USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	May 01, 2011 years
U.S. Based Company [Member]
Acquired Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Cash paid for business acquisition	$ 8
Purchase price allocated to net assets	8
Purchase price allocated to net Intangible Assets	4
Purchase price allocated to goodwill	$ 5
Amortization of useful life of acquired intangible assets, minimum (in years)	5
Amortization of useful life of acquired intangible assets, maximum (in years)	15

XML

Acquisition

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Acquisition

Acquisition

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, we acquired a U.S.-based company engaged in the manufacturing of integrated circuits for approximately $8 million in cash. The purchase price was allocated to the acquired net assets based on estimates of fair values as follows: net assets of $8 million, including intangible assets of $4 million and goodwill of $5 million. The intangible assets are being amortized over their useful lives ranging from 5 to 15 years. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the acquired business commencing as of the acquisition date. Pro forma results of operations for the acquisition have not been presented because the effects of the acquisition were not material to our prior financial statements.

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Details 1) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Apr. 29, 2012	Oct. 30, 2011
Finite Lived Intangible Assets Net [Abstract]
Intangible assets, Gross Carrying Amount	$ 989	$ 989
Intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	(528)	(490)
Intangible assets, Net Book Value	461	499	[1]
Purchased technology [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets Net [Abstract]
Intangible assets, Gross Carrying Amount	728	728
Intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	(374)	(346)
Intangible assets, Net Book Value	354	382
Customer and distributor relationships [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets Net [Abstract]
Intangible assets, Gross Carrying Amount	257	257
Intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	(152)	(142)
Intangible assets, Net Book Value	105	115
Other [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets Net [Abstract]
Intangible assets, Gross Carrying Amount	4	4
Intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	(2)	(2)
Intangible assets, Net Book Value	$ 2	$ 2

[1] Amounts as of October 30, 2011 have been derived from audited financial statements as of that date.

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Share Based Compensation Expense) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
Summary of share-based compensation expense related to share-based awards granted to employees, directors, and non-employees
Allocated share-based compensation expense	$ 13	$ 9	$ 24	$ 16
Costs of Products Sold [Member]
Summary of share-based compensation expense related to share-based awards granted to employees, directors, and non-employees
Allocated share-based compensation expense	2	1	3	2
Research and Development [Member]
Summary of share-based compensation expense related to share-based awards granted to employees, directors, and non-employees
Allocated share-based compensation expense	5	3	9	6
Selling, General and Administrative [Member]
Summary of share-based compensation expense related to share-based awards granted to employees, directors, and non-employees
Allocated share-based compensation expense	$ 6	$ 5	$ 12	$ 8
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Grants in Period, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value	$ 14.46	$ 12.30	$ 14.55	$ 12.21

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - Unaudited (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Apr. 29, 2012	Oct. 30, 2011
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 954	$ 829	[1]
Trade accounts receivable, net	274	328	[1]
Inventory	218	194	[1]
Other current assets	62	42	[1]
Total current assets	1,508	1,393	[1]
Property, plant and equipment, net	402	316	[1]
Goodwill	177	177	[1]
Intangible assets, net	461	499	[1]
Other long-term assets	63	61	[1]
Total assets	2,611	2,446	[1]
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	257	221	[1]
Employee compensation and benefits	57	89	[1]
Capital lease obligations - current	1	2	[1]
Other current liabilities	41	38	[1]
Total current liabilities	356	350	[1]
Long-term liabilities:
Capital lease obligations - non-current	3	4	[1]
Other long-term liabilities	85	86	[1]
Total liabilities	444	440	[1]
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)			[1]
Shareholders' equity:
Ordinary shares, no par value; 243,761,105 shares and 245,962,320 shares issued and outstanding on January 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011, respectively	1,442	1,479	[1]
Retained earnings	723	525	[1]
Accumulated other comprehensive income	2	2	[1]
Total shareholders' equity	2,167	2,006	[1]
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$ 2,611	$ 2,446	[1]

[1] Amounts as of October 30, 2011 have been derived from audited financial statements as of that date.

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Employee Share Purchase Plan) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Sep. 14, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Mar. 14, 2012
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Employee stock purchase plan offering price	at a price equal to the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the ordinary shares at either the beginning or ending of the relevant offering period
Maximum contribution per participant under ESPP	10.00%
Maximum Contribution per participant under ESPP as the value of common stock				$ 25,000
Maximum shares purchased per participant under ESPP					2,500
Share purchased under ESPP	100,000	200,000
Amounts paid for share purchases under ESPP	$ 4,000,000	$ 3,000,000
Shares available for issuance under the ESPP	7,600,000
Purchase Period for ESPP			6 months

XML

Overview and Basis of Presentation

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Overview and Basis of Presentation

Overview, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Overview

Avago Technologies Limited, or the “Company”, was organized under the laws of the Republic of Singapore in August 2005. We are the successor to the Semiconductor Products Group, or SPG, of Agilent Technologies, Inc., or Agilent. On December 1, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the assets of SPG from Agilent for $2.7 billion, or the SPG Acquisition.

We are a designer, developer and global supplier of analog semiconductor devices with a focus on III-V based products. We offer products in four primary target markets: wireless communications, wired infrastructure, industrial and automotive electronics, and consumer and computing peripherals. Applications for our products in these target markets include cellular phones, consumer appliances, data networking and telecommunications equipment, enterprise storage and servers, factory automation, displays, optical mice and printers.

References herein to “we”, “our”, “us” and “Avago” are to Avago Technologies Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires.

Basis of Presentation

Fiscal Periods. We operate on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to October 31. Our first quarter of fiscal year 2012 ended on January 29, 2012, the second quarter ended on April 29, 2012, the third quarter will end on July 29, 2012 and the fourth quarter will end on October 28, 2012.

Information. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Avago and all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Interim information presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements has been prepared by management and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are necessary for the fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown, and is in accordance with GAAP. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011, or fiscal year 2011, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on December 16, 2011.

The operating results for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending October 28, 2012, or fiscal year 2012, or for any other future period. The balance sheet data as of October 30, 2011 presented is derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.

Significant Accounting Policies

Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could affect the results of operations reported in future periods.

Concentrations of credit risk and significant customers. Our cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable are potentially subject to concentration of credit risk. Cash and cash equivalents may be redeemable upon demand and are maintained with several financial institutions that management believes are of high credit quality and therefore bear minimal credit risk. The Company seeks to mitigate its credit risks by spreading such risks across multiple counterparties and monitoring the risk profile of these counterparties. Our accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located in the U.S. and internationally. Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is generally diversified due to the large number of entities comprising our customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographies. We perform regular credit evaluations of our customers’ financial conditions, and requiring collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances.

We sell our products through our direct sales force, manufacturers' representatives and distributors. Two customers accounted for 17% and 11%, respectively, of our net accounts receivable balance at April 29, 2012 and these same two customers accounted for 15% and 10%, respectively, of our net accounts receivable balance at October 30, 2011. For the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, one customer represented 16% and 17% of net revenue, respectively. For the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, no single customer represented 10% or more of net revenue.

Warranty.  We accrue for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. Product warranty costs are estimated based upon our historical experience and specific identification of product requirements, which may fluctuate based on product mix. Additionally, we accrue for warranty costs associated with occasional or unanticipated product quality issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated.

The following table summarizes the changes in accrued warranty (in millions):

Balance as of October 30, 2011 — included in other current liabilities	$	6
Adjustment to estimate — released to cost of products sold	(3		)
Balance as of April 29, 2012 — included in other current liabilities	$	3

See Note 11. “Commitments and Contingencies” for further details.

Net income per share. Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of ordinary shares and potentially dilutive share equivalents outstanding during the period. Diluted shares outstanding includes the dilutive effect of in-the-money options, restricted share units, or RSUs, and employee share purchase rights under the Avago Technologies Limited Employee Share Purchase Plan, or ESPP. The dilutive effect of such equity awards is calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options and to purchase shares under the ESPP, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when equity awards become deductible for income tax purposes are collectively assumed to be used to repurchase shares.

Diluted net income per share for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 excluded the potentially dilutive effect of weighted-average outstanding equity awards, including options, RSUs, and ESPP rights, to purchase 1 million, 1 million, 1 million, and less than 1 million ordinary shares, respectively, as their effect was antidilutive.

The following is a reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share computations for the periods presented (in millions, except per share data):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Net income (Numerator):
Net income	$	134	$	135	$	259	$	254
Shares (Denominator):
Basic weighted average ordinary shares outstanding	244		245		246		245
Add: Incremental shares for:
Dilutive effect of share options, RSUs and ESPP rights	6		7		5		7
Shares used in diluted computation	250		252		251		252
Net income per share:
Basic:
Net income per share	$	0.55	$	0.55	$	1.05	$	1.04
Diluted:
Net income per share	$	0.54	$	0.54	$	1.03	$	1.01

Supplemental cash flow disclosures. At April 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011, we had $41 million and $21 million, respectively, of unpaid purchases of property, plant, and equipment included in accounts payable and other current liabilities. Amounts reported as unpaid purchases are recorded as cash outflows from investing activities for purchases of property, plant, and equipment in the consolidated statement of cash flows in the period they are paid.

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 reflects a reclassification of $2 million of expenses related to our credit agreement entered into in March 2011 from cash flows provided by operating activities to cash flows used in financing activities. As a result, net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in financing activities for this period each increased by a corresponding amount. These reclassifications have no impact on previously reported net cash activities.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, we adopted the updated guidance issued by Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, related to fair value measurements and disclosures, which requires separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 fair value measurements (see Note 6. “Fair Value” for further discussion of fair value measurements). Because this new standard is related primarily to the disclosures required in our financial statements, its adoption has not had a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, we adopted the updated guidance issued by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board on fair value measurement and related disclosure requirements, which changes some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The adoption of this guidance did not have any significant impact on our results of operations and financial position and disclosures in our financial statements.

Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted

In September 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance on multi-employer pension plans. This guidance is intended to provide more information about an employer's financial obligations to a multi-employer pension plan and, therefore, help financial statement users better understand the financial health of all of the significant plans in which the employer participates. The updated guidance does not change the current recognition and measurement guidance for an employer's participation in a multi-employer plan. This guidance will be effective for our fiscal year 2012, with early adoption permitted. Other than requiring additional disclosures in our financial statements, we believe the adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In August 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update on goodwill impairment testing. This guidance is

intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the goodwill impairment test by providing entities an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The new guidance will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year ending November 3, 2013, or fiscal year 2013, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect this new guidance to have a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance is intended to enhance comparability between entities that report under GAAP and those that report under International Financial Reporting Standards and to provide a more consistent method of presenting non-owner transactions that affect an entity’s equity. In accordance with the new guidance, an entity has the option to present total comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements and eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The requirement to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the face of the consolidated statement of income has been deferred by an update issued by the FASB in December 2011. This new guidance should be applied retrospectively and will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year 2013, with early adoption permitted. Other than its impact on the presentation of other comprehensive income, we believe the adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Details 4) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012 Purchased technology [Member] years	Apr. 29, 2012 Customer and distributor relationships [Member] years	Apr. 29, 2012 Other [Member] years	May 01, 2011 U.S. Based Company [Member] years
Acquired Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Purchase price allocated to net Intangible Assets				$ 4
Amortization intangible assets:
Weighted average amortization period of Acquired Intangible Assets (in years)	8	7	22	14

XML

Fair Value (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

The table below sets forth by level our financial assets that were accounted for at fair value as of April 29, 2012. The table does not include cash on hand and also does not include assets that are measured at historical cost or any basis other than fair value (in millions).

	Portion of Carrying Value Measured at Fair Value as of April 29, 2012		Fair Value Measurement as of April 29, 2012 Using Quoted Prices In Active Market For Identical Assets (Level 1)
Assets:
Time deposits (1)	$	612	$	612
Investment Funds — Deferred Compensation Plan Assets (2)	7		7
Bank acceptances (2)	1		1
Available-for-sale securities (3)	4		4
Total assets measured at fair value	$	624	$	624
Liabilities:
Deferred Compensation Plan Liabilities (4)	$	7	$	7

_________________________________

(1) Included in cash and cash equivalents in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

(2) Included in other current assets in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

(3) Included in other long-term assets in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

(4) Included in other current liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

XML

Borrowings (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Loss on extinguishment of debt	$ 0	$ 1,000,000	$ 0	$ 20,000,000
Write-off debt issuance cost and other related expense			0	6,000,000
Revolving credit facility, amount outstanding	0		0
Senior Subordinated Notes [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
11 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015				230,000,000
Debt instrument stated interest percentage	11.875%		11.875%
Premium on redemption of senior notes percentage				5.938%
Loss on extinguishment of debt				19,000,000
Premium on redemption of senior notes				14,000,000
Write-off debt issuance cost and other related expense				$ 5,000,000

XML

Related Party Transactions (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Transactions and balances with related parties

Transactions and balances with our related parties were as follows (in millions):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended					Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011
Net revenue:
Flextronics1	$	—		$	40	$	—		$	68
Wistron Corporation2	2			1		4			1
eSilicon Corporation3	1			—		1			—
Total costs and expenses:
WIN Semiconductor Corp.4	—			20		—			20
KLA-Tencor5	1			—		2			—
eSilicon Corporation3	—		*	—		—		*	—

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
Receivables:
Wistron Corporation2	$	1	$	1
eSilicon Corporation3	1		—

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
Payables:
KLA-Tencor5	$	1	$	—

_________________________________

* Represent amounts less than $0.5 million.

¹ Amounts represent net revenue transactions with Flextronics through the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011. Flextronics ceased to be a related party after the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.

² Amount for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 represents net revenue transactions for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011 only. Wistron Corporation became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.

³ Amounts represent net revenue and purchase transactions with eSilicon Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 and accounts receivable balance as of April 29, 2012. eSilicon Corporation became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2012.

⁴ Amounts represent transactions with WIN Semiconductor Corp. included in cost of products sold incurred during the period WIN Semiconductor Corp was a related party. WIN Semiconductor Corp. became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 and ceased being a related party during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011.

⁵Amounts represent purchase transactions with KLA-Tencor for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and accounts payable balance as of April 29, 2012. KLA-Tencor became a related party during the first quarter of fiscal year 2012.

XML

Inventory

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]

Inventory

Inventory

Inventory consists of the following (in millions):

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
Finished goods	$	53	$	48
Work-in-process	106		106
Raw materials	59		40
Total inventory	$	218	$	194

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - Unaudited (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Apr. 29, 2012	Oct. 30, 2011
Shareholders' equity:
Ordinary Shares, par value
Ordinary Shares, shares issued	244,726,290	245,962,320
Ordinary Shares, shares outstanding	244,726,290	245,962,320

XML

Subsequent Events

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events

In May 2012, we entered into a confidential settlement and patent cross-licensing agreement with TriQuint to resolve all outstanding litigation between the parties. There was no impact to our financial position or results of operations as of April 29, 2012 as a result of the confidential settlement.

On June 6, 2012, the Board declared an interim cash dividend on the Company’s ordinary shares of $0.15 per share, payable on June 29, 2012 to shareholders of record at the close of business (5:00 p.m.), Eastern Time, on June 18, 2012.

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	Mar. 02, 2012
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Avago Technologies LTD
Entity Central Index Key	0001441634
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Apr. 29, 2012
Amendment Flag	false
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--10-28
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		244,802,147

XML

Overview and Basis of Presentation (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

May 01, 2011

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Reclassifications [Text Block]

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 reflects a reclassification of $2 million of expenses related to our credit agreement entered into in March 2011 from cash flows provided by operating activities to cash flows used in financing activities. As a result, net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in financing activities for this period each increased by a corresponding amount. These reclassifications have no impact on previously reported net cash activities.

Standard Product Warranty, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Warranty.  We accrue for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. Product warranty costs are estimated based upon our historical experience and specific identification of product requirements, which may fluctuate based on product mix. Additionally, we accrue for warranty costs associated with occasional or unanticipated product quality issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated.

Fiscal Periods

Fiscal Periods. We operate on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to October 31. Our first quarter of fiscal year 2012 ended on January 29, 2012, the second quarter ended on April 29, 2012, the third quarter will end on July 29, 2012 and the fourth quarter will end on October 28, 2012.

Information

Information. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Avago and all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Interim information presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements has been prepared by management and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are necessary for the fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown, and is in accordance with GAAP. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011, or fiscal year 2011, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on December 16, 2011.

The operating results for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending October 28, 2012, or fiscal year 2012, or for any other future period. The balance sheet data as of October 30, 2011 presented is derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.

Use of estimates

Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could affect the results of operations reported in future periods.

Concentrations of credit risk and significant customers

Concentrations of credit risk and significant customers. Our cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable are potentially subject to concentration of credit risk. Cash and cash equivalents may be redeemable upon demand and are maintained with several financial institutions that management believes are of high credit quality and therefore bear minimal credit risk. The Company seeks to mitigate its credit risks by spreading such risks across multiple counterparties and monitoring the risk profile of these counterparties. Our accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located in the U.S. and internationally. Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is generally diversified due to the large number of entities comprising our customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographies. We perform regular credit evaluations of our customers’ financial conditions, and requiring collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances.

We sell our products through our direct sales force, manufacturers' representatives and distributors. Two customers accounted for 17% and 11%, respectively, of our net accounts receivable balance at April 29, 2012 and these same two customers accounted for 15% and 10%, respectively, of our net accounts receivable balance at October 30, 2011. For the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, one customer represented 16% and 17% of net revenue, respectively. For the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, no single customer represented 10% or more of net revenue.

Net income per share

Net income per share. Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of ordinary shares and potentially dilutive share equivalents outstanding during the period. Diluted shares outstanding includes the dilutive effect of in-the-money options, restricted share units, or RSUs, and employee share purchase rights under the Avago Technologies Limited Employee Share Purchase Plan, or ESPP. The dilutive effect of such equity awards is calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options and to purchase shares under the ESPP, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when equity awards become deductible for income tax purposes are collectively assumed to be used to repurchase shares.

Diluted net income per share for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 excluded the potentially dilutive effect of weighted-average outstanding equity awards, including options, RSUs, and ESPP rights, to purchase 1 million, 1 million, 1 million, and less than 1 million ordinary shares, respectively, as their effect was antidilutive.

Supplemental cash flow disclosures

Supplemental cash flow disclosures. At April 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011, we had $41 million and $21 million, respectively, of unpaid purchases of property, plant, and equipment included in accounts payable and other current liabilities. Amounts reported as unpaid purchases are recorded as cash outflows from investing activities for purchases of property, plant, and equipment in the consolidated statement of cash flows in the period they are paid.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance and Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, we adopted the updated guidance issued by Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, related to fair value measurements and disclosures, which requires separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 fair value measurements (see Note 6. “Fair Value” for further discussion of fair value measurements). Because this new standard is related primarily to the disclosures required in our financial statements, its adoption has not had a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, we adopted the updated guidance issued by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board on fair value measurement and related disclosure requirements, which changes some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The adoption of this guidance did not have any significant impact on our results of operations and financial position and disclosures in our financial statements.

Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted

In September 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance on multi-employer pension plans. This guidance is intended to provide more information about an employer's financial obligations to a multi-employer pension plan and, therefore, help financial statement users better understand the financial health of all of the significant plans in which the employer participates. The updated guidance does not change the current recognition and measurement guidance for an employer's participation in a multi-employer plan. This guidance will be effective for our fiscal year 2012, with early adoption permitted. Other than requiring additional disclosures in our financial statements, we believe the adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In August 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update on goodwill impairment testing. This guidance is

intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the goodwill impairment test by providing entities an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The new guidance will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year ending November 3, 2013, or fiscal year 2013, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect this new guidance to have a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance is intended to enhance comparability between entities that report under GAAP and those that report under International Financial Reporting Standards and to provide a more consistent method of presenting non-owner transactions that affect an entity’s equity. In accordance with the new guidance, an entity has the option to present total comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements and eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The requirement to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the face of the consolidated statement of income has been deferred by an update issued by the FASB in December 2011. This new guidance should be applied retrospectively and will be effective for the first quarter of our fiscal year 2013, with early adoption permitted. Other than its impact on the presentation of other comprehensive income, we believe the adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Segment Reporting

ASC 280 “Segment Reporting,” or ASC 280, establishes standards for the way public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual consolidated financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. ASC 280 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - Unaudited (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
Net revenue	$ 577	$ 560	$ 1,140	$ 1,110
Cost of products sold:
Cost of products sold	284	271	563	536
Amortization of intangible assets	14	14	28	28
Restructuring charges	1	0	1	0
Total cost of products sold	299	285	592	564
Gross margin	278	275	548	546
Research and development	84	76	166	149
Selling, general and administrative	51	55	101	105
Amortization of intangible assets	5	5	10	11
Restructuring charges	1	1	2	1
Total operating expenses	141	137	279	266
Income from operations	137	138	269	280
Interest expense	0	(1)	(1)	(4)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	0	(1)	0	(20)
Other expense, net	3	1	2	1
Income before income taxes	140	137	270	257
Provision for income taxes	6	2	11	3
Net income	$ 134	$ 135	$ 259	$ 254
Basic:
Net income per share	$ 0.55	$ 0.55	$ 1.05	$ 1.04
Diluted:
Net income per share	$ 0.54	$ 0.54	$ 1.03	$ 1.01
Weighted average shares :
Basic	244	245	246	245
Diluted	250	252	251	252
Dividends declared and paid per share	$ 0.13	$ 0.08	$ 0.25	$ 0.15

XML

Shareholders' Equity

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Equity [Abstract]

Shareholders' Equity

Shareholders’ Equity

Share Repurchase Program

On June 8, 2011, the Company's board of directors, or the Board, authorized the Company to repurchase up to 15 million of our outstanding ordinary shares, not to exceed $500 million in aggregate, or the 2011 share repurchase program. Under the 2011 share repurchase program, the Company repurchased and cancelled 0.2 million and 2.8 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $6 million and $85 million in cash, during the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively. The weighted-average purchase prices per share for shares repurchased were $34.41 and $30.50 for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, respectively. All repurchased shares were immediately retired. The 2011 share repurchase program expired at the Company's 2012 annual general meeting on April 4, 2012.

On April 4, 2012, our Board of Directors has authorized the Company to repurchase up to 15 million of its ordinary shares, or the 2012 share repurchase program, pursuant to the shareholder approval of the Company's 2012 share purchase mandate received at the Company's 2012 Annual General Meeting on April 4, 2012, or the 2012 share purchase mandate. Pursuant to the 2012 share purchase mandate, the Company is authorized, upon Board approval, to repurchase up to approximately 24.6 million of its ordinary shares in open market transactions or pursuant to equal access schemes, prior to the date on which the 2013 Annual General Meeting of the Company is held or required by law to be held. However, the Company may not repurchase more than 15 million ordinary shares without further action by the Board. The 2012 share repurchase program, will expire at the Company's 2013 Annual General Meeting, unless earlier terminated. Share repurchases will be made in the open market at such times and in such amounts as the Company deems appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, market conditions and applicable legal requirements. The 2012 share repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares and may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. All repurchased shares are immediately retired. As of April 29, 2012, no shares had been purchased under the 2012 share repurchase program.

Dividends

We paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 and $0.08 per share, or $32 million and $20 million in total during the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively. We have paid aggregate dividends of $61 million and $37 million during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively.

Share-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense related to share-based awards granted to employees, directors, and non-employees for the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 (in millions):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Cost of products sold	$	2	$	1	$	3	$	2
Research and development	5		3		9		6
Selling, general and administrative	6		5		12		8
Total share-based compensation expense	$	13	$	9	$	24	$	16

The weighted-average assumptions utilized for our Black-Scholes valuation model for options and ESPP rights granted during the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 are as follows:

	Options
	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Risk-free interest rate	0.8	%	2.2	%	0.8	%	2.2	%
Dividend yield	1.4	%	0.9	%	1.4	%	0.9	%
Volatility	53.0	%	44.0	%	54.0	%	44.0	%
Expected term (in years)	5.0		5.0		5.0		5.0

	ESPP
	Fiscal QuarterEnded				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Risk-free interest rate	0.2	%	0.2	%	0.1	%	0.2	%
Dividend yield	1.4	%	0.4	%	1.3	%	0.2	%
Volatility	52.0	%	40.0	%	52.0	%	41.0	%
Expected term (in years)	0.5		0.5		0.5		0.5

The dividend yield for the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 are based on the dividend yield as of the respective option grant dates. Expected volatility is based on the combination of historical volatility of guideline publicly-traded companies over the period commensurate with the expected life of the options and the implied volatility of guideline publicly-traded companies from traded options with a term of 180 days or greater measured over the last three months. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the average U.S. Treasury Strips rate during the period, which approximates the rate in effect at the time of grant. Our computation of expected term was based on data, such as the data of peer companies and company-specific attributes that we believe could affect employees’ exercise behavior.

Based on the above assumptions, the weighted-average fair values of the options granted under the Company's equity incentive award plans for the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 were $14.46 and $12.30, respectively, and $14.55 and $12.21 for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively. The weighted-average fair values of the rights to purchase shares in the ESPP for the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 were $12.94 and $7.86, respectively, and $12.84 and $7.03 for the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of RSUs granted in the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 was $35.49. No RSUs were granted in the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011. The weighted-average fair values of RSUs granted in the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 were $35.22 and $32.39, respectively.    

Total compensation cost related to unvested options as of April 29, 2012 was $132 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average service period of 3 years. Total unrecognized compensation cost related to the ESPP as of April 29, 2012 was $1 million, and is expected to be recognized over the remaining portion of the current offering period under the ESPP, which ends on September 14, 2012. Total compensation cost related to unvested RSUs as of April 29, 2012 was $21 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average service period of 3 years.

Equity Incentive Award Plans

A summary of option award activity related to our equity incentive plans is as follows (in millions, except years and per share amounts):

			Option Awards Outstanding
	Shares Available for Grant		Number Outstanding		Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance as of October 30, 2011	10		19		$	17.93
Annual increase in shares available for
issuance, per equity incentive plan terms	6		—		—
Granted	(4	)	4		35.13
Exercised	—		(1	)	12.79
Cancelled	1		(1	)	20.80
Balance as of April 29, 2012	13		21		21.47		6.53	$	278
Vested as of April 29, 2012			6		13.11		5.87	127
Vested and expected to vest as of
April 29, 2012			19		20.87		6.50	267

The following table summarizes the ranges of outstanding and exercisable option awards as of April 29, 2012 (in millions, except years and per share amounts):

	Option Awards Outstanding				Option Awards Exercisable
Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share		Number Exercisable	Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
$0.00-5.00	2	3.76	$	4.99	1	$	4.98
5.01-10.00	2	6.64	9.26		1	9.17
10.01-15.00	5	6.20	12.10		2	11.19
15.01-20.00	1	7.58	17.54		—	17.72
20.01-25.00	3	8.25	20.53		1	20.54
25.01-30.00	—	6.81	29.21		—	28.52
30.01-35.00	4	5.99	32.74		1	32.34
35.01-40.00	4	6.80	35.48		—	—
Total	21	6.53	21.47		6	13.11

RSU activity and the number of outstanding RSUs were not material for either of the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011.

Employee Share Purchase Plan

The ESPP consists of successive six-month offering periods and permits eligible employees to purchase ordinary shares through payroll deductions, at the end of each offering period, at a price equal to the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the ordinary shares at either the beginning or ending of the relevant offering period. Deductions may not exceed 10% of an employee's base compensation and an employee may not purchase more than $25,000 worth of shares in any calendar year or offering period, or more than 2,500 shares on any purchase date. A total of 0.1 million and 0.2 million shares were purchased under the ESPP for aggregate consideration of $4 million and $3 million during the fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011, respectively. No shares related to ESPP were issued during the fiscal quarters ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011. The purchase dates under the ESPP are scheduled to occur in March and September of each year, which fall in our second and fourth fiscal quarters, respectively. As at April 29, 2012, 7.6 million shares remained available for issuance under the ESPP.

XML

Fair Value

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value

Fair Value

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three level hierarchy is applied to prioritize the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under the guidance for fair value measurements are described below:

Level 1—Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Our Level 1 assets include time deposits, bank acceptances, investment funds—deferred compensation plan assets and available-for-sale securities investments. We measure investment funds and available-for-sale securities investments at quoted market price as they are traded in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions. Time deposits are highly liquid with maturities of ninety days or less. Bank acceptances are highly liquid with maturities of one hundred and eighty days or less. Due to their short-term maturities, we have determined that the fair value of time deposits and bank acceptances should be their face value.

Level 2—Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. We did not have any Level 2 asset or liability activities during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012.

Level 3—Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Level 3 assets and liabilities include cost method investments, goodwill, amortizable intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment, which are measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow approach when they are impaired. Quantitative information for Level 3 assets and liabilities reviewed at each reporting period, includes indicators of significant deterioration in the earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality, business prospects of the investee, and financial indicators of the investee's ability to continue as a going concern.

We record at cost non-marketable investments where we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence or control and periodically review them for impairment. During fiscal year 2011, we made an investment of $1 million in the common stock of a privately-held non-U.S. company. This equity investment is accounted for under the cost method and is included on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet in other long-term assets. In fiscal year 2011, we also entered into a secured loan and warrant purchase agreement with this company, pursuant to which we provided them with a secured loan of $1 million, at an annual interest rate of 8%, for a term of one year. Based on the quantitative assessment of the financial condition and business prospects of the investee, this equity investment and loan were both determined to be impaired during the fiscal quarter ended January 29, 2012.

We did not have any Level 3 asset or liability activities other than those noted above during the two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below sets forth by level our financial assets that were accounted for at fair value as of April 29, 2012. The table does not include cash on hand and also does not include assets that are measured at historical cost or any basis other than fair value (in millions).

	Portion of Carrying Value Measured at Fair Value as of April 29, 2012		Fair Value Measurement as of April 29, 2012 Using Quoted Prices In Active Market For Identical Assets (Level 1)
Assets:
Time deposits (1)	$	612	$	612
Investment Funds — Deferred Compensation Plan Assets (2)	7		7
Bank acceptances (2)	1		1
Available-for-sale securities (3)	4		4
Total assets measured at fair value	$	624	$	624
Liabilities:
Deferred Compensation Plan Liabilities (4)	$	7	$	7

_________________________________

(1) Included in cash and cash equivalents in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

(2) Included in other current assets in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

(3) Included in other long-term assets in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

(4) Included in other current liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet

During the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012, there were no material transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 fair value instruments.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

There were no non-financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value as of April 29, 2012.

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, to the extent the underlying liability will be settled in cash, approximate carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Equity [Abstract]

Summary of share-based compensation expense related to share-based awards granted to employees, directors, and non-employees

The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense related to share-based awards granted to employees, directors, and non-employees for the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 (in millions):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Cost of products sold	$	2	$	1	$	3	$	2
Research and development	5		3		9		6
Selling, general and administrative	6		5		12		8
Total share-based compensation expense	$	13	$	9	$	24	$	16

Weighted average assumptions of stock options

The weighted-average assumptions utilized for our Black-Scholes valuation model for options and ESPP rights granted during the fiscal quarters and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and May 1, 2011 are as follows:

	Options
	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Risk-free interest rate	0.8	%	2.2	%	0.8	%	2.2	%
Dividend yield	1.4	%	0.9	%	1.4	%	0.9	%
Volatility	53.0	%	44.0	%	54.0	%	44.0	%
Expected term (in years)	5.0		5.0		5.0		5.0

Weighted average assumptions of employee share purchase plan

	ESPP
	Fiscal QuarterEnded				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Risk-free interest rate	0.2	%	0.2	%	0.1	%	0.2	%
Dividend yield	1.4	%	0.4	%	1.3	%	0.2	%
Volatility	52.0	%	40.0	%	52.0	%	41.0	%
Expected term (in years)	0.5		0.5		0.5		0.5

Summary of share based payment award activity

A summary of option award activity related to our equity incentive plans is as follows (in millions, except years and per share amounts):

			Option Awards Outstanding
	Shares Available for Grant		Number Outstanding		Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Balance as of October 30, 2011	10		19		$	17.93
Annual increase in shares available for
issuance, per equity incentive plan terms	6		—		—
Granted	(4	)	4		35.13
Exercised	—		(1	)	12.79
Cancelled	1		(1	)	20.80
Balance as of April 29, 2012	13		21		21.47		6.53	$	278
Vested as of April 29, 2012			6		13.11		5.87	127
Vested and expected to vest as of
April 29, 2012			19		20.87		6.50	267

Ranges of outstanding and exercisable awards

The following table summarizes the ranges of outstanding and exercisable option awards as of April 29, 2012 (in millions, except years and per share amounts):

	Option Awards Outstanding				Option Awards Exercisable
Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share		Number Exercisable	Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
$0.00-5.00	2	3.76	$	4.99	1	$	4.98
5.01-10.00	2	6.64	9.26		1	9.17
10.01-15.00	5	6.20	12.10		2	11.19
15.01-20.00	1	7.58	17.54		—	17.72
20.01-25.00	3	8.25	20.53		1	20.54
25.01-30.00	—	6.81	29.21		—	28.52
30.01-35.00	4	5.99	32.74		1	32.34
35.01-40.00	4	6.80	35.48		—	—
Total	21	6.53	21.47		6	13.11

XML

Overview and Basis of Presentation (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Schedule of Product Warranty Liability [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes the changes in accrued warranty (in millions):

Balance as of October 30, 2011 — included in other current liabilities	$	6
Adjustment to estimate — released to cost of products sold	(3		)
Balance as of April 29, 2012 — included in other current liabilities	$	3

Reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share

The following is a reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share computations for the periods presented (in millions, except per share data):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Net income (Numerator):
Net income	$	134	$	135	$	259	$	254
Shares (Denominator):
Basic weighted average ordinary shares outstanding	244		245		246		245
Add: Incremental shares for:
Dilutive effect of share options, RSUs and ESPP rights	6		7		5		7
Shares used in diluted computation	250		252		251		252
Net income per share:
Basic:
Net income per share	$	0.55	$	0.55	$	1.05	$	1.04
Diluted:
Net income per share	$	0.54	$	0.54	$	1.03	$	1.01

XML

Related Party Transactions

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions

eSilicon Corporation

Mr. John T. Dickson, who became a director of the Company on January 18, 2012, also serves as a director of eSilicon Corporation. In the ordinary course of business, on an arm’s length basis, we sell certain of our products to and purchase certain intellectual properties, design services and maintenance services from eSilicon Corporation.

KLA-Tencor Corporation

Mr. John T. Dickson, also serves as a director of KLA-Tencor Corporation., or KLA-Tencor. In the ordinary course of business, on an arm’s length basis, we purchase certain materials, equipment, and tools from KLA-Tencor.

Wistron Corporation

Mr. John Min-Chih Hsuan, a director of the Company, is also a director of Wistron Corporation, one of our customers. In the ordinary course of business, on an arm’s length basis, we sell certain of our products to Wistron Corporation.

WIN Semiconductor Corp.

Mr. John Min-Chih Hsuan, a director of the Company, was previously a director at WIN Semiconductor Corp., one of our third-party contract manufacturer with whom we do business in the ordinary course, on an arm’s length basis. Mr. Hsuan resigned as a director of WIN Semiconductor Corp. in June 2011.

Flextronics International Ltd.

Mr. James A. Davidson, a director of the Company until March 9, 2011, also serves as a director of Flextronics International Ltd., or Flextronics. In the ordinary course of business, on an arm’s length basis, we sell certain of our products to Flextronics.

Transactions and balances with our related parties were as follows (in millions):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended					Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012			May 1, 2011
Net revenue:
Flextronics1	$	—		$	40	$	—		$	68
Wistron Corporation2	2			1		4			1
eSilicon Corporation3	1			—		1			—
Total costs and expenses:
WIN Semiconductor Corp.4	—			20		—			20
KLA-Tencor5	1			—		2			—
eSilicon Corporation3	—		*	—		—		*	—

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
Receivables:
Wistron Corporation2	$	1	$	1
eSilicon Corporation3	1		—

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
Payables:
KLA-Tencor5	$	1	$	—

_________________________________

* Represent amounts less than $0.5 million.

¹ Amounts represent net revenue transactions with Flextronics through the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011. Flextronics ceased to be a related party after the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.

² Amount for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 represents net revenue transactions for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2011 only. Wistron Corporation became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.

³ Amounts represent net revenue and purchase transactions with eSilicon Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012 and accounts receivable balance as of April 29, 2012. eSilicon Corporation became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2012.

⁴ Amounts represent transactions with WIN Semiconductor Corp. included in cost of products sold incurred during the period WIN Semiconductor Corp was a related party. WIN Semiconductor Corp. became a related party during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 and ceased being a related party during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011.

⁵Amounts represent purchase transactions with KLA-Tencor for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012 and accounts payable balance as of April 29, 2012. KLA-Tencor became a related party during the first quarter of fiscal year 2012.

XML

Income Taxes

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

For the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended April 29, 2012, we recorded an income tax provision of $6 million and $11 million, respectively, compared to $2 million and $3 million for the fiscal quarter and two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, respectively. The income tax provision for the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011 included the recognition of a $3 million tax benefit as a result of U.S. legislation enacted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 retroactively reinstating the research and development tax credit.

XML

Segment Information

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Segment Information

Segment Information

ASC 280 “Segment Reporting,” or ASC 280, establishes standards for the way public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual consolidated financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. ASC 280 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. We have concluded that we have one reportable segment based on the following factors: sales of semiconductors represents our only material source of revenue; substantially all products offered incorporate analog functionality and are manufactured under similar manufacturing processes; we use an integrated approach in developing our products in that discrete technologies developed are frequently integrated across many of our products; and we use a common order fulfillment process and similar distribution approach for our products. Broad distributor networks are typically used to distribute our products, with large accounts being serviced by a direct sales force. The Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker as defined by ASC 280.

Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

ASC 280 “Segment Reporting,” or ASC 280, establishes standards for the way public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual consolidated financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. ASC 280 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

     The following table sets forth changes in our commitments as of April 29, 2012 for the fiscal periods noted (in millions).

	Total		2012 (remainder)		2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter
Purchase commitments	$	75	$	75	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Other Contractual Commitments	49		7		18		12		7		5		—		—

Purchase Commitments.  We have unconditional purchase obligations which include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty.

Other Contractual Commitments.  Represents amounts payable pursuant to agreements related to outsourced IT, human resources, financial infrastructure outsourcing services and other services agreements.

There were no other substantial changes to our contractual commitments during the first two quarters of fiscal year 2012 from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2011.

Contingencies

From time to time, we are involved in litigation that we believe is of the type common to companies engaged in our line of business, including commercial disputes and employment issues. As of the date of this filing, we are not involved in any pending legal proceedings that we believe would likely have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, from time to time certain disputes involve claims by third parties that our activities infringe their patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property rights. These claims generally involve the demand by a third-party that we cease the manufacture, use or sale of the allegedly infringing products, processes or technologies and/or pay substantial damages or royalties for past, present and future use of the allegedly infringing intellectual property. For example, on July 23, 2009, TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc., or TriQuint, filed a complaint against us and certain of our subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court, District of Arizona seeking declaratory judgment that four of our patents relating to RF filter technology used in our wireless products are invalid and, if valid, that TriQuint’s products do not infringe any of those patents. TriQuint withdrew those claims with respect to three of those four patents. In addition, TriQuint claimed that certain of our wireless products infringe three of its patents. We filed our answer and initial counterclaim on September 17, 2009, denying infringement, asserting the invalidity of TriQuint’s patents and asserting infringement by TriQuint of ten Avago patents, and filed additional counterclaims on March 25, 2010 for the misappropriation of Avago trade secrets. On October 16, 2009, TriQuint filed its answer to our initial counterclaim, denying infringement and filed an antitrust counterclaim and counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non infringement and invalidity. The court dismissed TriQuint’s antitrust counterclaims on procedural grounds on March 16, 2010, but on August 3, 2010 granted TriQuint's motion to file an amended pleading for its anti-trust claims. Effective May 12, 2012, we entered into a confidential settlement and patent cross-license agreement with TriQuint that resolved these outstanding actions. There was no impact to our financial position or results of operations as of April 29, 2012 as a result of the confidential settlement.

With respect to our legal proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, we have not yet been able to determine whether an unfavorable outcome is probable or reasonably possible and have not been able to reasonably estimate the amount or range of any possible loss. As a result, no amounts have been accrued or disclosed in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these legal proceedings.

Claims that our products or processes infringe or misappropriate any third-party intellectual property rights (including claims arising through our contractual indemnification of our customers) often involve highly complex, technical issues, the outcome of which is inherently uncertain. Moreover, from time to time we pursue litigation to assert our intellectual property rights. Regardless of the merit or resolution of any such litigation, complex intellectual property litigation is generally costly and diverts the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel.

Warranty

Commencing in fiscal year 2008, we notified certain customers of a product quality issue and began taking additional steps to correct the quality issue and work with affected customers to determine potential costs covered by our warranty obligations. We maintain insurance coverage for product liability and have been working with our insurance carriers to determine the extent of covered losses in this situation. Based on settlements with customers and the status of discussions with other affected customers and discussions with our insurance carriers, we recorded a charge of $2 million during fiscal year 2009 to cover costs relating to this quality issue in excess of expected insurance coverage. During the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012, we reached a final settlement agreement with a customer on this product quality issue. However, the final settlement amount was fully recovered from our insurance carrier in the same period. Therefore, during the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2012, we released the $2 million warranty charge, resulting in a $2 million decrease of warranty accrual and cost of goods sold for this product warranty issue.

Indemnifications to Hewlett-Packard and Agilent

Agilent has given multiple indemnities to Hewlett-Packard Company in connection with its activities prior to its spin-off from Hewlett-Packard Company in June 1999 for the businesses that constituted Agilent prior to the spin-off. As the successor to the SPG business of Agilent, we have acquired responsibility for indemnifications related to assigned intellectual property agreements. Additionally, when we completed the acquisition of SPG from Agilent in December 2005, we provided indemnities to Agilent with regard to Agilent’s conduct of the SPG business prior to the SPG acquisition. In our opinion, the fair value of these indemnifications is not material and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to these indemnification obligations.

Other Indemnifications

As is customary in our industry and as provided for in local law in the United States and other jurisdictions, many of our standard contracts provide remedies to our customers and others with whom we enter into contracts, such as defense, settlement, or payment of judgment for intellectual property claims related to the use of our products. From time to time, we indemnify customers, as well as our suppliers, contractors, lessors, lessees, companies that purchase our businesses or assets and others with whom we enter into contracts, against combinations of loss, expense, or liability arising from various triggering events related to the sale and the use of our products, the use of their goods and services, the use of facilities and state of our owned facilities, the state of the assets and businesses that we sell and other matters covered by such contracts, usually up to a specified maximum amount. In addition, from time to time we also provide protection to these parties against claims related to undiscovered liabilities, additional product liability or environmental obligations. In our experience, claims made under such indemnifications are rare and the associated estimated fair value of the liability is not material.

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Details 3) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012
Finite lived intangible assets future amortization expense
2012 (remainder)	$ 39
2013	77
2014	77
2015	76
2016	59
2017	49
Thereafter	84
Finite lived intangible assets, future amortization expense, total	$ 461

XML

Subsequent Events (Details) (USD $)	0 Months Ended
	Jun. 06, 2012
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Common Stock dividend declared date	Jun. 06, 2012
Interim cash dividend per share	$ 0.15
Common Stock dividend payable date	Jun. 29, 2012
Common Stock dividend record date	Jun. 18, 2012

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Intangible assets

Amortizable purchased intangibles consist of the following (in millions):

	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value
As of April 29, 2012:
Purchased technology	$	728	$	(374	)	$	354
Customer and distributor relationships	257		(152		)	105
Other	4		(2		)	2
Total	$	989	$	(528	)	$	461
As of October 30, 2011:
Purchased technology	$	728	$	(346	)	$	382
Customer and distributor relationships	257		(142		)	115
Other	4		(2		)	2
Total	$	989	$	(490	)	$	499

Amortization of purchased intangible assets

The following table presents the amortization of purchased intangible assets (in millions):

	Fiscal Quarter Ended				Two Fiscal Quarters Ended
	April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011		April 29, 2012		May 1, 2011
Cost of products sold	$	14	$	14	$	28	$	28
Operating expenses	5		5		10		11
Total	$	19	$	19	$	38	$	39

Expected amortization expense

Based on the amount of intangible assets subject to amortization at April 29, 2012, the expected amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows (in millions):

Fiscal Year	Amount
2012 (remainder)	$	39
2013	77
2014	77
2015	76
2016	59
2017	49
Thereafter	84
	$	461

Weighted-average amortization periods

The weighted-average amortization periods remaining by intangible asset category as at April 29, 2012 were as follows (in years):

Amortizable intangible assets:
Purchased technology	8
Customer and distributor relationships	7
Other	22

XML

Overview and Basis of Presentation (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011	Apr. 29, 2012	May 01, 2011
Net income (Numerator):
Net income	$ 134	$ 135	$ 259	$ 254
Shares (Denominator):
Basic weighted average ordinary shares outstanding	244	245	246	245
Add: Incremental shares for:
Dilutive effect of share options, RSUs and ESPP rights	6	7	5	7
Shares used in diluted computation	250	252	251	252
Basic:
Net income per share	$ 0.55	$ 0.55	$ 1.05	$ 1.04
Diluted:
Net income per share	$ 0.54	$ 0.54	$ 1.03	$ 1.01

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Apr. 29, 2012
Purchase commitment [Member]
Purchase and Other Contractual Commitments
Commitments, Total	$ 75
Commitments 2012 (remainder)	75
Commitments, 2013	0
Commitments, 2014	0
Commitments, 2015	0
Commitments, 2016	0
Commitments, 2017	0
Commitments, Thereafter	0
Other Contractual Commitments [Member]
Purchase and Other Contractual Commitments
Commitments, Total	49
Commitments 2012 (remainder)	7
Commitments, 2013	18
Commitments, 2014	12
Commitments, 2015	7
Commitments, 2016	5
Commitments, 2017	0
Commitments, Thereafter	$ 0

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Weighted-Average Assumptions) (Details)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012 years	May 01, 2011 years	Apr. 29, 2012 years	May 01, 2011 years
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Weighted average assumptions of stock options
Risk-free interest rate	0.80%	2.20%	0.80%	2.20%
Dividend yield	1.40%	0.90%	1.40%	0.90%
Volatility	53.00%	44.00%	54.00%	44.00%
Expected term (in years)	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0
Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]
Weighted average assumptions of stock options
Risk-free interest rate	0.20%	0.20%	0.10%	0.20%
Dividend yield	1.40%	0.40%	1.30%	0.20%
Volatility	52.00%	40.00%	52.00%	41.00%
Expected term (in years)	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Unaudited (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012		May 01, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$ 259		$ 254
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	75		79
Loss on extinguishment of debt	0		6
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Property Plant Equipment	1		1
Impairment of investment and loan receivable from investee	2		0
Share-based compensation	24		16
Tax benefits from share-based compensation	2		8
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation	(1)		(2)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Trade accounts receivable, net	54		(3)
Inventory	(24)		(5)
Accounts payable	13		15
Employee compensation and benefits	(32)		(20)
Other current assets and current liabilities	(18)		(30)
Other long-term assets and long-term liabilities	(5)		1
Net cash provided by operating activities	350		320
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment	(103)		(51)
Acquisitions and investments, net of cash acquired	0		(9)
Net cash used in investing activities	(103)		(60)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from government grants	2		0
Debt repayments	0		(230)
Payments of Financing Costs	0		(2)
Payments on capital lease obligations	(1)		(2)
Issuance of ordinary shares	22		44
Repurchase of ordinary shares	(85)		0
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation	1		2
Dividend payments to shareholders	(61)		(37)
Net cash used in financing activities	(122)		(225)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	125		35
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period	829	[1]	561
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 954		$ 596

[1] Amounts as of October 30, 2011 have been derived from audited financial statements as of that date.

XML

Borrowings

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Borrowings

Borrowings

Debt Repayments

During the two fiscal quarters ended May 1, 2011, we redeemed the remaining $230 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 11 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due December 1, 2015, or senior subordinated notes. We redeemed the senior subordinated notes at a 5.938% premium of the principal amount plus accrued interest, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $19 million, which consisted of a $14 million premium and a $5 million write-off of debt issuance costs and other related expenses.

Revolving Credit Facility

As of April 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility and were in compliance with the financial covenants under our credit agreement.

XML

Overview and Basis of Presentation (Details 1) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012
Summary of changes in warranty accrual
Beginning Balance	$ 6
Adjustment to estimate- released to cost of products sold	(3)
Ending Balance	$ 3

XML

Fair Value (Details Textuals) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified		6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Apr. 29, 2012	Apr. 29, 2012 Level 1 [Member] Time deposits [Member] Maximum [Member]	Apr. 29, 2012 Level 1 [Member] Bank acceptances [Member] Maximum [Member]	Oct. 30, 2011 Privately-held non-U.S. company [Member] Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value (Textuals) [Abstract]
Time deposits, maturity period		90 days	180 days
Investments in privately-held company				$ 1
Secured loan to privately-held-company				1
Secured loan terms				1 year
Secured loan interest rate				8.00%
Nonfinancial assets or liabilities measured at fair value	$ 0

XML

Inventory (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Apr. 29, 2012

Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]

Summary of inventory

Inventory consists of the following (in millions):

	April 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
Finished goods	$	53	$	48
Work-in-process	106		106
Raw materials	59		40
Total inventory	$	218	$	194