Form 10-K

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $732,538,929, computed by reference to the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of $45.32 per share of Common Stock on June 30, 2012. For the purpose of the foregoing calculation only, all directors and executive officers of the registrant and owners of more than 5% of the registrant’s common stock are assumed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily conclusive for any other purpose.

As of February 18, 2013, there were 16,737,045 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.

The registrant has incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K, portions of its Proxy Statement for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than 120 days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”), unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, “IPC,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, together with IPC’s affiliated professional corporations and limited liability companies (“affiliated professional organizations”). Our affiliated professional organizations are separate legal entities that provide physician services in certain states and with which we have management agreements. For financial reporting purposes we consolidate the revenues and expenses of all our practice groups that we own or manage because we have a controlling financial interest in these practices based on applicable accounting rules and as described in our accompanying consolidated financial statements. Also, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, “our affiliated hospitalists” refers to physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants employed or contracted by either our wholly-owned subsidiaries or our affiliated professional organizations. References to “practices” or “practice groups” refer to our affiliated professional organizations and the wholly-owned subsidiaries of IPC that provide medical services, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.

This Report including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events and the future results of IPC that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions about our business. Words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “target,” “potential,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “sees,” “estimates” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in the “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7, and elsewhere in this Report as well as those discussed from time to time in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings and reports. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report, or for changes made to this document by wire services or Internet service providers. If we update or correct one or more forward-looking statements, investors and others should not conclude that we will make additional updates or corrections with respect to other forward-looking statements.

We are a leading provider of hospitalist services in the United States. Hospitalist medicine is organized around inpatient care, primarily delivered in acute care hospitals, and is focused on providing, managing and coordinating the care of hospitalized patients. We believe we are the largest dedicated hospitalist company in the United States based on revenues, patient encounters and number of affiliated hospitalists. As of December 31, 2012, our over 1,410 affiliated hospitalists, including physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants (collectively “affiliated hospitalists”) provide hospitalist solutions at over 350 hospitals and 810 other inpatient and post-acute care facilities primarily in 28 states. We have had 14.1 million patient encounters since the beginning of 2010. Collectively, our affiliated hospitalists work with more than 39,000 referring physicians and 3,920 health plans. Our early entry into the emerging hospitalist industry has permitted us to establish a reputation and leadership position that we believe is closely identified with the success of hospitalist medicine.

We began operating our first physician practice in 1998. Since that time we have increased the number of practice groups to over 255 as of December 31, 2012. In the three years ending December 31, 2012, we have acquired 43 practice groups. We successfully integrated these acquisitions into IPC and onto our proprietary technology-based practice management system known as IPC-Link^®. Our affiliated hospitalists are primarily full-time employees of our wholly-owned subsidiaries or our affiliated professional organizations. We also employ over 660 other physicians and non-physician providers and contract with over 210 independent contractors, who provide episodic care as needed.

We assist hospitals, post-acute facilities and payors in improving quality of care, increasing operating efficiencies and reducing costs. Through our affiliated hospitalists, we provide, manage and coordinate the care of hospitalized patients and serve as the inpatient partner of primary care physicians and specialists, allowing them to focus their time and resources on their office based practices or their specialties. We also provide our affiliated hospitalists with the infrastructure, information management systems, specialized training programs and administrative support necessary to perform these services. We believe we are an attractive employer to hospitalists, whether practicing as individuals or in groups, because our administrative services help reduce the burden associated with managing a physician practice. Likewise, we believe hospitalists choose to affiliate with us because of our leadership position, financial resources, technology-based infrastructure, commitment to training and development, and our performance-based compensation. We provide a comprehensive solution of clinical and management experience, proprietary technology and high quality of care to healthcare constituents, which we believe provides us with a sustainable competitive advantage to capitalize on the rapid growth in demand for hospitalists.

Founded approximately 20 years ago in the early 1990s, the field of hospitalist medicine continues to be an evolving and developing medical specialty. Hospitalists focus on a patient’s care from the time of admission to discharge, working in close consultation with primary care physicians, other referring physicians and medical providers to coordinate the inpatient care delivery system and manage the entire inpatient episode of care. Hospitalists receive medical training generally in primary care, with the majority having experience in internal medicine, family practice or other medical specialties. Hospitalists differ from primary care physicians and specialists by treating patients only in a non-office based setting. By focusing exclusively on inpatient medicine, a hospitalist develops practice expertise in both the diagnosis and treatment of common conditions that require hospitalization and the optimization of patient care within a hospital. Hospitalists practice in inpatient facilities, including acute care hospitals, long-term acute care facilities, specialty hospitals, psychiatric facilities and post-acute care facilities. Acute care hospitals represent the largest component of inpatient facilities in which hospitalists practice. We believe hospitalists serve a necessary and critical role in coordinating, managing and communicating with the different healthcare constituents within the inpatient care and post-hospital settings.

Hospitalists assume the inpatient care responsibilities that are otherwise provided by the primary care physician or attending physician and are reimbursed by third parties using the same visit-based or procedural billing codes as would be used by the primary care physician or attending physician. By practicing each day in the same facility, hospitalists perform consistent functions, interact regularly with the same healthcare professionals and become highly accustomed to specific facility processes, which can result in greater efficiency, less process variability and better patient outcomes. We believe hospitalists are better able to achieve these results because of their exclusive focus on inpatient care without the inherent distraction of balancing both inpatient and outpatient care responsibilities. Likewise, we believe hospitalists generate operating and cost efficiencies by managing the treatment of a large number of patients with similar clinical needs.

According to the Society of Hospitalist Medicine (SHM), the number of hospitalists has grown from an estimated 800 in the mid-1990s to an estimated 34,000 in 2012, making it one of the fastest-growing medical specialties in the United States. The SHM also reports that hospitalists have a presence at a majority of hospitals nationwide.

We believe the growing demand for hospitalists is primarily driven by six significant changes in the healthcare delivery system:

We seek to provide high-quality professional medical care for patients while reducing the cost of care for inpatient facilities and payors. Either through our wholly-owned subsidiaries or our affiliated professional organizations, as of December 31, 2012 we employ or currently affiliate with over 1,410 hospitalists, including physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants, who are organized into traditional medical group practices to provide hospitalist services. To enhance the efficiency of these operations, we offer our affiliated hospitalists specialized training programs, information management systems and the administrative support necessary to effectively manage these nationally integrated practice group organizations. We have entered into long-term management contracts with our affiliated professional organizations in those states where business entities, as opposed to physicians, are prohibited by statute from practicing medicine and include these entities in our consolidated financial statements.

We generate approximately 94% of our net revenues through our affiliated hospitalists’ patient encounters at hospitals and other inpatient and post-acute care facilities. Patients are referred to our affiliated hospitalists through their community medical providers, emergency departments, payors and hospitals, in the same manner as many other medical professionals receive referrals. Third party payors and patients pay for our services in the same manner as they would pay the primary care physicians and other medical professionals who otherwise would be furnishing this direct patient care. The remainder of our revenues is substantially comprised of contracts with hospitals and other inpatient facilities to provide hospitalist services.

We believe each major constituent of the healthcare delivery system, including patients, primary care physicians, specialists, acute care hospitals, alternative sites of inpatient care, and health plans, can benefit from better coordinated inpatient care. We are positioned to assist each of these constituents in finding solutions to many of the challenges associated with patient care at inpatient facilities.

Patients frequently experience medical conditions at unpredictable times and may require admission to a hospital when their primary care physician is unavailable or patients may not have a primary care physician. The quality or the perception of the care received by the patient may suffer as a result of the limited availability of dedicated physicians in the inpatient setting to answer patient questions and provide continuity throughout the inpatient experience. Uncoordinated communication between healthcare providers, patients and family members often negatively affects the inpatient experience and may also impact patient outcomes.

In addition to providing medical services, our affiliated hospitalists are trained to serve as team leaders in coordinating inpatient care and providing a consistent, single point of contact for patients, family members and medical professionals. Our affiliated hospitalists facilitate the communication of patient information in the inpatient setting and, after the patient is discharged, often assist with the transition to outpatient or other post-hospital care by communicating with the outpatient physician provider. In the event a patient does not have a primary care physician, our hospitalists refer the patient to physicians or clinics in the area.

Primary care physicians are typically focused on treating patients in an office-based setting, not an inpatient facility. The time spent making hospital rounds may reduce the time available for primary care physicians to treat patients in their offices, which can result in lower earnings for the physician. Visits to post-acute care facilities are equally challenging and time-consuming. In addition, an inpatient’s medical needs may be unpredictable and require the primary care physician to provide off-hour attention and unscheduled care. Even within the confines of the provision of office-based services, the burden on primary care physicians is increasing because of the continuing reduction in the average length of inpatient stays and the corresponding increase in the acuity of patients treated in an outpatient setting.

We train and support our affiliated hospitalists to manage the care of hospitalized patients, enabling them to assume the inpatient care responsibilities that were previously provided by the primary care physician. As a result of our services, primary care physicians have the opportunity to spend more time treating office-based patients, which may increase their earnings. Our hospitalist programs result in reduced on-call time for primary care physicians and relieve practice demands during evenings and weekends. Our affiliated hospitalists also coordinate the discharge and transition of inpatients to outpatient care by communicating with patients’ primary care physicians after discharge from an inpatient facility. We believe that this communication also enhances patients’ continuity of care.

Specialist physicians are trained to focus on specific procedures or medical conditions. As a result, specialists often desire to limit their practice to their medical specialty. Hospitalized patients, however, frequently experience multiple medical conditions that require consideration and coordination among several specialists and other care providers. For example, an orthopedic surgeon treating an elderly patient must consider the patient’s other medical conditions, such as diabetes or hypertension, which can be treated by our affiliated hospitalists or other healthcare providers.

Our affiliated hospitalists focus on the needs of hospitalized patients, thereby relieving specialists of primary responsibility for certain unrelated clinical issues in the inpatient setting and providing these specialists with an opportunity to focus on their specialty. We believe that this enhances the productivity of specialists. Our affiliated hospitalists also serve as a liaison between specialists and patients, primary care physicians, other care providers, and family members.

Acute care hospitals must provide consistent and reliable care despite potentially having hundreds of admitting physicians who may differ in their own methods of care, preferences for medications and utilization and review processes. The resulting process variability can lead to an increased number of clinical errors, higher medical costs and deficiencies in medical record documentation

which can lead to reimbursement and regulatory issues. Additionally, acute care hospitals may experience difficulty finding available physicians because of the reluctance of some medical staff members to assume the care of unassigned patients. This is further complicated by the statutory and organizational limitations on intern and resident duty hours. Acute care hospitals also face the challenge of providing medical care to indigent patients. Finally, acute care hospitals can often face emergency department overcrowding caused by large numbers of unassigned patients seeking admission to the hospital through the emergency department.

Our hospitalist programs are structured to provide acute care hospitals with a consistent on-site physician presence that typically results in fewer admitting physicians overseeing patients in the hospital, thereby reducing process variability and enhancing the ability to implement standardized practices. We believe our affiliated hospitalists’ consistent presence in the facilities leads to more efficient processes within the acute care hospitals, which can improve clinical outcomes, decrease average length of inpatient stay and lower costs per day. By concentrating the care of more patients with relatively fewer physicians, hospitals can more easily implement new initiatives and enhance compliance with protocols. We believe our hospitalist training programs lead to improved medical record documentation, which can improve hospital reimbursement and result in better regulatory compliance. Overall, through our hospitalist programs, we provide acute care hospitals with increased patient coverage, rapid response times, efficient management of care for insured and indigent patients and increased emergency department throughput.

Alternative sites of inpatient and post-acute care facilities such as long-term acute care facilities, specialty hospitals, psychiatric facilities, rehabilitation hospitals and skilled nursing facilities face many of the same challenges as acute care hospitals. There is increasing demand for facility-based care in the post-acute setting, and these facilities face challenges related to the narrow breadth of physician coverage that is typically available at such sites.

Our affiliated hospitalists provide alternative sites of inpatient care in the post-acute setting with consistent on-site physician availability and experience. We believe this benefits inpatient care in post-acute care facilities by providing a single point of contact and regular communication with other healthcare constituents outside the site of care. Our hospitalists in both post-acute and acute care facilities may coordinate patient care with each other, thereby providing a continuum of care which improves quality while enhancing the patient experience. By coordinating inpatient care at such facilities, we believe our affiliated hospitalists manage the appropriate utilization of patient care to the benefit of both the facility and the patient.

Health plans face significant increases in costs caused by inconsistent healthcare practices, redundant diagnostic tests, inefficient discharge coordination between hospitals and outpatient physician providers and process variability. In addition, health plans can incur additional costs when their members are admitted to hospitals by physicians who are not credentialed by their plan.

Health plans contract with our credentialed affiliated hospitalists to provide in-network coverage for hospitalized members. We believe our affiliated hospitalists provide consistent healthcare practices, coordinate ordering of diagnostic tests with outpatient physician providers and reduce process variability, resulting in reduced medical costs for health plans while promoting quality of care.

We provide our affiliated hospitalists with administrative and professional services to support their practice of medicine, reduce their administrative burden and improve their operating efficiencies.

Information Management System. We provide our affiliated hospitalists with access to IPC-Link^® through our web-based “Virtual Office” portal to support their clinical, administrative and communications needs. IPC-Link^® is distinctive in its ability to capture the results of each doctor-patient encounter and organize these results into a searchable database. IPC-Link^® enables our affiliated hospitalists to view and record important patient data, and allows hospitalists in a practice group to share patient information as needed. Additionally, the technology enables our affiliated hospitalists to communicate directly and securely to our clinical call center and our risk management and compliance departments. IPC-Link^® operates via a secure, HIPAA-compliant web interface, which allows us to assume responsibility for billing, collection and reimbursement for services rendered by our affiliated hospitalists.

Transition Management. We use IPC-Link^® to create customized surveys for patients who are discharged to home from an inpatient facility. To assist in monitoring and documenting the patient’s discharge or transition to outpatient care, IPC-Link^® provides our call center with patient information and follow-up instructions. Our system provides for our dedicated call center staff of patient representatives and nurses to contact the discharged patient, usually within 48 hours of discharge to home, to discuss the patient’s ability to understand post-discharge instructions, obtain prescribed medication, schedule an appointment with a primary care physician, and fulfill other health-related post-discharge needs. Our system enables us to identify a patient’s post-discharge medical issues on a near real-time basis, coordinate care with the appropriate care provider, improve outcomes, lower the re-admission rate into inpatient facilities, and decrease our medical malpractice risk.

Regional Management. Each of our operating regions is led by an experienced executive director and team of marketing and administrative staff that is responsible for the overall non-clinical management of our affiliated practice groups within a region, as well as coordinating hospitalist recruitment, monitoring financial performance and contracting with facilities and payors. Our regional executive directors and their staffs provide our affiliated hospitalists with direct, day-to-day access to an experienced management team that is familiar with the opportunities and challenges faced by hospitalists in a particular region.

Recruiting. As a national company, we have greater resources to commit to recruiting hospitalists than most other practice groups do. We have a dedicated staff of recruiting professionals who are regionally assigned to source, screen and provide candidates to each of our local markets. Our recruiting strategy includes advertising in national physician publications and websites, exhibiting at professional association meetings, establishing a regular presence at select residency programs and leveraging our existing hospitalist relationships.

Training. We have developed extensive training programs and tools for our newly hired hospitalists and our existing affiliated hospitalists. Our newly hired hospitalists are required to enroll in our comprehensive new hire training program prior to treating patients. The new hire training program emphasizes the role of the hospitalist in leading the clinical care team and provides training on billing and medical record documentation, compliance, risk management and other related topics regarding hospitalist practices. Newly hired hospitalists are also paired with experienced local hospitalists as part of the new hire training program. We provide continuing medical education programs for our existing affiliated hospitalists that are designed to enhance the skills of our affiliated hospitalists in key areas, including clinical, risk management and compliance. We sponsor local and national retreats for our affiliated hospitalists to foster better communication and learning and enhance their professional practices. Additionally, we use the automated reporting capabilities of IPC-Link^® to allow our affiliated hospitalists to compare and benchmark performance metrics. This information provides positive feedback to our affiliated hospitalists when strong performance is achieved and helps to identify specific areas for improvement.

Financial Reporting. Each month we provide our practice groups with a detailed financial statement that enables each of our affiliated hospitalists to see the financial performance of their respective practices. Our incentive compensation plan is based on these financial statements and provides transparency regarding bonus compensation to our affiliated hospitalists.

Billing and Collections. We assume responsibility for all billing, reimbursement and collection processes relating to hospitalist services provided by our affiliated hospitalists and practice groups. To address the increasingly complex and time-consuming process for obtaining reimbursement for medical services, we have invested in both the technical and human resources necessary to create an efficient billing and reimbursement process. We provide extensive training to our affiliated hospitalists, which emphasizes detailed documentation and proper coding protocol for services provided and procedures performed.

Risk Management. We provide risk management and quality management programs to our affiliated hospitalists. We take a proactive role in promoting early reporting, evaluation and resolution of incidents that may evolve into medical claims. Our risk management program includes hospitalist education and a sophisticated claims management program. The collection and analysis of claims data enables us to identify loss patterns and trends to better target risk management intervention and proactively address potential liability. Risk management education is included in our core orientation program for newly hired hospitalists, and advanced risk management topics are offered to our tenured affiliated hospitalists.

Compliance. Compliance programs are an important part of our business, which permit us and our affiliated hospitalists to respond to new regulations and legislation as they arise. We have invested significant resources in developing and enhancing our compliance program, including proprietary compliance issue tracking databases, routine checks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (OIG) list of Excluded Persons or Entities, automated monitoring of key claims management processes and facility contract analysis and monitoring. We also provide comprehensive monitoring and internal auditing processes by both internal staff and third-party coding specialists. Compliance education is an important component of our new hire training program for our entire staff.

We are a national hospitalist group practice consisting of over 255 local practice groups operating in 32 different regions as of December 31, 2012. The practice groups within each region generally consist of all of our affiliated hospitalists that practice at a specific inpatient facility. These practice groups are supported by both dedicated local professional management teams and clinical leadership.

Operational Management Teams. Our 32 regions are each organized around a regional executive director and a small staff of marketing/practice management and administrative personnel. These management teams are responsible for strategic planning, coordinating with our national staff to recruit hospitalists, managing hospital and payor relationships and contracts, monitoring financial performance, marketing to new referral sources, credentialing with hospitals and payors, identifying new facilities in markets where we may expand our presence and managing the day-to-day non-clinical practice activities.

Clinical Leadership. Each practice group has a practice group leader who is involved in the management of the practice group, including staffing and scheduling, monitoring quality of care and financial performance, and new business initiatives. Each practice group leader is a practicing hospitalist and is part of a regional council that advises the region’s executive director, contributes to clinical leadership for the region, and engages in the planning process for the region. Each regional council appoints a representative to serve on our national advisory board, which advises our chief medical officer. We also support the regional and local clinical leadership structure with our corporate medical affairs department, which monitors company-wide clinical performance and benchmarks, develops programs and coordinates our clinical research activities. In July 2010, we launched a Fellowship Program in Hospitalist Leadership in partnership with the University of California, San Francisco Division of Hospital Medicine and its Center for the Health Professions. We believe this program represents the most advanced and effective clinical leadership program available in hospitalist medicine today.

We have a dedicated development and acquisition team whose role is to execute our growth strategy by identifying and capitalizing on complementary facility contract and acquisition opportunities in new markets. In existing markets, our development and acquisition team assists the executive director for the region with growth opportunities by identifying and capitalizing on acquisitions of other local practice groups or contracting with new facilities within the region or obtaining contracts with facilities where our affiliated hospitalists are already practicing. In new markets, our development and acquisition team identifies acquisition and contract opportunities and coordinates the due diligence, negotiation and execution of these acquisitions and hospital contracts.

IPC-Link^® is a fully-integrated technology-based management system that supports the clinical, administrative and communication needs of our affiliated hospitalists. Our system contains proprietary software, sophisticated databases and rules engines, automated billing interfaces and extensive web-based reporting tools. We developed the system internally and have designed this system to accommodate significant future growth in our business.

Our affiliated hospitalists access IPC-Link^® through our web-based “Virtual Office” portal, which can be accessed through a web browser running on any internet connected computer. This portal into the system provides our dispersed workforce with extensive resources and information content and serves as a centralized contact point for our affiliated hospitalists. The “Virtual Office” provides regional and company-wide news, clinical reference materials, an on-line library, practice schedules, access to clinical and business reports related to the practice groups, web-based continuing medical education, patient feedback, access to employee benefits plan information and a secure e-mail system with all of our employees. Our affiliated hospitalists must utilize this portal to access their clinical information and bill for their services.

Our affiliated hospitalists use IPC-Link^® to record each patient encounter and are personally responsible for entering data into the system to reduce chances for error or misinterpretation by a nurse or assistant. Our system audits the billing information entered by our affiliated hospitalists for completeness and accuracy and creates an electronic billing file for automated submission to payors. IPC-Link^® is distinctive in its ability to capture the results of each clinician-patient encounter and organize these results into a searchable database.

IPC-Link^® technology enables our affiliated hospitalists to communicate directly and securely with referring physicians and other healthcare constituents in addition to our clinical call center and our risk management and compliance departments. For example, based on information entered directly by the hospitalist, our system produces concise admission, progress and discharge notes and faxes this information to referring physicians and other healthcare constituents. Our faxed discharge notes contain key patient information for use following discharge such as diagnoses, medical tests and studies performed, consultants used, medications prescribed, home care ordered and follow-up care recommendations. IPC-Link^® also alerts our call center when a patient has been discharged from the hospital to home and generates a tailored post-discharge survey that we administer to that patient by phone. IPC-Link^® compiles call center findings and interventions and faxes a summary to the patient’s outpatient physician.

We also use IPC-Link^® to monitor our financial and clinical performance. We create customized, web-based reports based on near real-time data to track important operating metrics, including length of stay, patient volumes and physician productivity, referral sources and trends, readmission rates, physician billings, clinical quality indicators, patient satisfaction and patient post-discharge survey results.

In addition to our intellectual property rights related to IPC-Link^®, we also own certain copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets.

Our affiliated hospitalists, in general, provide services in any inpatient facility where they have credentials, called privileges, regardless of whether we have entered into a contract with the inpatient facility. When we contract with hospitals and other inpatient facilities, we typically provide various professional services, including supporting the emergency department, assisting in bed allocation, planning patient discharge, coordinating with ancillary departments, cooperating with facility management, developing facility policies and procedures, training facility personnel and developing call schedules. We believe our facility contracts benefit the inpatient facility by establishing a stable and consistent provider of hospitalist services to that facility, while we benefit by having our affiliated hospitalists obtain the opportunity to provide patient care services to patients admitted through the emergency department who do not have a primary care physician available to care for them, expand the base of the referral relationships within the facility and strengthen our contractual revenue base. In these contracted facilities, billings to third-party payors for direct patient care constitute the most significant source of our revenue.

The term of these contracts varies between facilities, but they typically can be terminated with cause for various reasons and usually contain provisions allowing for termination without cause by either party upon 90 days notice. Agreements with the inpatient facilities typically contain confidentiality provisions and requirements that the facilities maintain their own insurance. We have structured these contracts and agreements in accordance with the restrictions and requirements of applicable federal and state laws.

Our regional management teams negotiate health plan contracts on behalf of our affiliated hospitalists in their local markets. These agreements vary from plan to plan and payment is typically a negotiated fee per service. Our regional management teams assist our affiliated hospitalists with any required credentialing with these plans, provide ongoing contract management and maintain the relationships with the health plans. We believe that these health plan contracts can enhance our practices by capturing additional patient volumes as well as promoting prompt payment for services.

Our practice groups and affiliated hospitalists are responsible for the provision of medical care to patients. Our affiliated hospitalists are employees of either our wholly-owned subsidiaries or affiliated professional organizations. Our affiliated professional organizations are separate legal entities, comprised of corporations, limited liability companies and limited partnerships. For financial reporting purposes, we consolidate the revenues and expenses of all our practice groups that we own or manage because we have a controlling financial interest in these practices based on applicable accounting rules as described in our accompanying consolidated financial statements. We provide all of the non-medical, administrative and management services necessary for the operations of each of our affiliated professional organizations under comprehensive long-term management agreements. Under the terms of these agreements, we are paid for the provision of these non-medical management services based upon either the financial performance of the applicable practice group or a fixed fee. Each agreement is for a term of 20 years with 10 year automatic renewal periods, which we may terminate at any time, with or without cause, with 30 days prior written notice to the affiliated professional organization. Agreements with our affiliated professional organizations contain a confidentiality provision and a power of attorney appointing our company as its attorney-in-fact.

Each affiliated professional organization is organized or qualified to do business in a state where only a physician-owned professional entity may provide medical services, and each affiliated professional organization is owned by a licensed physician. To ensure our continued affiliation with and management of the affiliated professional organizations, we have entered into a succession agreement with each affiliated professional organization and physician owner that prohibits the sale or transfer of the ownership interests of the affiliated professional organization to non-physicians and provides for the repurchase of such ownership interests by the affiliated professional organization for a nominal amount upon the occurrence of certain events. We have structured these arrangements in accordance with the restrictions and requirements of applicable state law, including state law that prohibits the corporate practice of medicine.

Our affiliated hospitalists are employed under contracts which typically have one or two year employment terms with automatic extensions. The contracts can be terminated with cause for various reasons, and generally contain provisions allowing for termination without cause by either party upon 30 to 60 days notice. Agreements with our affiliated hospitalists generally contain a confidentiality provision and a non-compete and/or non-solicitation provision. The scope and enforceability of these provisions varies from state to state.

Our affiliated hospitalists generally are paid a competitive fixed base salary, and most are eligible to participate in our physician incentive compensation plan, which provides varying bonuses based upon productivity and practice group profitability. We typically provide professional liability and workers compensation coverage, along with vacation, sick leave, continuing medical education, health, disability and 401(k) benefits.

We also utilize the services of independent contractors for certain of our health plan contracts. The independent contractors are paid on a per case basis.

The healthcare industry is highly competitive, and the market for hospitalists within this industry is highly fragmented. We believe we are the largest dedicated hospitalist company in the United States based on revenues, patient encounters and number of affiliated hospitalists. In each of our local markets and throughout the United States, there are hospitalist groups of varying sizes, as well as privately-owned hospitalist companies, with which our practice groups compete.

Companies in other segments of the healthcare industry, such as emergency department service companies, also provide hospitalist services. Competitors of this nature on a national basis include companies such as Team Health and EmCare, each of which may have greater financial and other resources available to them, affording them greater access to physicians as well as potential customers.

In addition, because of the fragmented nature of this market and the ability of physicians to provide services in any hospital where they have certain credentials, competition for growth in existing and expanding markets is not limited to our large competitors with substantial financial resources available to them. We also compete against local physician groups for qualified physicians, and sometimes with hospitals themselves to provide hospitalist services.

We are also dependent on our affiliated hospitalists to provide services and generate revenue. Competition for qualified physicians to act as hospitalists is intense. We compete with many types of healthcare providers, including teaching, research and government institutions, hospitals and other practice groups, for the services of such physicians.

We provide services primarily in the following 28 states: Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Wyoming. During 2012, approximately 60 % of our net revenue was generated by operations in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Missouri and Texas. In particular, Florida and Texas accounted for approximately 33% of our net revenue for 2012. Our growth strategy contemplates that we will continue to grow our business, in part, by expanding into new markets outside of the states in which we currently operate.

Our business has an inherent risk of claims of medical malpractice against our affiliated physicians and us. We contract and pay premiums for third-party professional liability insurance that indemnifies us and our affiliated hospitalists on a claims-made basis for losses incurred related to medical malpractice litigation. Professional liability coverage is required in order for our affiliated hospitalists to maintain hospital privileges. We record in our consolidated financial statements estimates for our liabilities, on an undiscounted basis, for self-insured deductibles, claims incurred and reported and claims incurred but not reported during the policy period, based on actuarial loss projections using historical loss patterns. For claims incurred and reported, an insurance receivable from our carrier has been recorded pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). See our discussion in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of our accrued medical malpractice reserves and related insurance receivables. Because many factors can affect historical and future loss patterns, the determination of an appropriate reserve involves complex, subjective judgment, and actual results may vary significantly from estimates. If the deductibles and other amounts that we are required to pay materially exceed our estimates, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our professional liability insurance policy, which ends December 31 of each year, is written on a claims-made basis providing first dollar coverage up to our policy limits on new claims reported in the policy period. For claims covered by our policies prior to 2009, the policies contained self-insurance retention limits. In December 2012, we renewed our annual professional liability insurance policy for 2013, effective January 1, 2013, under the same terms as our 2012 policy. There can be no assurance that we will obtain substantially similar coverage as is provided under the 2013 policy at acceptable costs and on favorable terms upon its expiration.

We believe that our insurance coverage is appropriate based upon our claims experience and the nature and risks of our business. In addition to the known incidents that have resulted in the assertion of claims, we cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us, our affiliated professional organizations or our affiliated hospitalists in the future where the outcomes of such claims are unfavorable. We believe that the ultimate resolution of all pending claims, including liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, there can be no assurance that future claims will not have such a material adverse effect on our business.

We also maintain general liability, casualty, worker’s compensation, director and officer, and other third-party insurance coverage subject to deductibles and other restrictions in accordance with industry standards. We believe that our insurance coverage is appropriate based upon our claims experience and the nature and risks of our business. However, we cannot assure that any pending or future claim will not be successful or will not exceed the limits of available insurance coverage.

The following is an approximate break-down of the affiliated hospitalists and non-clinical staff employed or contracted by our wholly-owned subsidiaries or our affiliated professional organizations by job classification as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

In addition to the full-time and part-time employees and independent contractors included above, we have employment agreements with over 660 other physicians and non-physician providers, who provide episodic care as needed. All of our employees and independent contractors are located in the United States. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We have had no labor-related work stoppages, and we believe we have positive relations with our employees and independent contractors.

In the ordinary course of our business, we become involved in pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, most of which involve claims of medical malpractice related to medical services provided by our affiliated hospitalists. We may also become subject to other lawsuits which could involve significant claims and/or significant defense costs.

We believe, based upon our review of pending actions and proceedings, that the outcome of such legal actions and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business. The outcome of such actions and proceedings, however, cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on our business in a future period.

On June 7, 2010, we received a civil investigative demand (CID) issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois. The CID requested information concerning claims that we have submitted to Medicare and Medicaid. The CID covered the period from January 1, 2003, through June 4, 2010, and requested production of a range of documents relating to our Medicare and Medicaid participation, physician arrangements, operations, billings and compliance programs. We believe we have a strong compliance focus, and that we operate with appropriate billing policies, procedures, provider training, and compliance programs and controls. We have produced responsive documents, will discuss with representatives of the government additional future productions to be made if requested and will continue to cooperate in the government investigation. We have been informed by the DOJ that a qui tam whistleblower complaint related to this investigation naming the Company has been filed under court seal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago). We also have been informed that several state attorneys general are examining our Medicaid claims in coordination with the DOJ. It is not possible to predict whether or when this matter may be resolved or what impact, if any, the outcome of this matter might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Founded in 1995 by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Adam D. Singer, M.D., we were incorporated in Delaware in January 1998. Our principal executive offices are located at 4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 617, North Hollywood, California 91602. Our telephone number is (888) 4IPC-DOC (888-447-2362). We maintain a website at www.hospitalist.com.

Our internet website address is www.hospitalist.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available through our internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this Report.

As a healthcare company, our operations and relationships with healthcare providers such as hospitals, other healthcare facilities, and healthcare professionals are subject to extensive and increasing regulation by numerous federal, state, and local government entities. These laws and regulations often are interpreted broadly and enforced aggressively by multiple government agencies, including OIG, the U.S. Department of Justice, and various state authorities. We have included brief descriptions of some, but not all, of the laws and regulations that affect our business. A finding that claims for services were not covered or not payable, or the imposition of sanctions associated with a violation of any of these healthcare laws and regulations, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot guarantee that our arrangements or business practices will not be subject to government scrutiny or be found to violate certain healthcare laws. Government audits, investigations and prosecutions, even if we ultimately are found to be without fault, can be costly and disruptive to our business. Moreover, changes in healthcare legislation or government regulation may restrict our existing operations, limit the expansion of our business or impose additional compliance requirements and costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The federal civil False Claims Act imposes civil liability on an individual or entity that knowingly submits false or fraudulent claims to the federal government for payment, and making false statements material to a false or fraudulent claim. The False Claims Act provides, in part, that the federal government may bring a lawsuit against any person or entity that it believes has knowingly or recklessly presented, or caused to be presented, a false or fraudulent request for payment from the federal government, or has made a false statement or used a false record material to a false claim. Private parties may initiate qui tam whistleblower lawsuits against a person or an entity under the False Claims Act in the name of the government and may share in the proceeds of a successful suit. The federal government has used the False Claims Act to prosecute a wide variety of alleged false claims and fraud allegedly perpetrated against Medicare and state healthcare programs (Medicaid). By way of illustration, these prosecutions may be based upon alleged patterns of improper coding, billing for services not rendered, billing services at a higher payment rate than appropriate, billing for care that is not considered medically necessary, and billing for services performed in violation of other laws, such as the Anti-Kickback Statute. Pursuant to the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009, the False Claims Act applies even to requests for payment submitted to non-government intermediaries which administer or otherwise coordinate payments for the Medicare, Medicaid or other health care programs. Further, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively the Affordable Care Act or ACA) conclusively established that a claim arising out of a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute may be a false claim for purposes of the False Claims Act. ACA also created an affirmative obligation to return an identified Medicare or Medicaid overpayment to the government within the later of 60 days of identification or the date any corresponding cost report was due if applicable and provided that failure to do so may constitute a false claim for purpose of the False Claims Act.

Penalties for False Claims Act violations include fines ranging from $5,500 to $11,000 (as adjusted for inflation) for each false claim, plus up to three times the amount of damages sustained by the government. A False Claims Act violation may provide the basis for the imposition of administrative penalties as well as exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid (or, in lieu of exclusion, a Corporate Integrity Agreement entered into with OIG). In addition to the provisions of the False Claims Act, which provide for civil enforcement, the federal government also can use several criminal statutes to prosecute persons who are alleged to have submitted false or fraudulent claims for payment to the federal government, or improperly retained funds received which were not due.

A number of states have enacted false claims acts that are similar to the federal False Claims Act. Even more states are expected to do so in the future because Section 6031 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) amended the federal law to encourage these types of changes, along with a corresponding increase in state initiated false claims enforcement efforts. Under the DRA, if a state enacts a false claims act that is at least as stringent as the federal statute and that also meets certain other requirements, the state will be eligible to receive a greater share of any monetary recovery obtained pursuant to certain actions brought under the state’s false claims act. The OIG, in consultation with the Attorney General of the United States, is responsible for determining if a state’s false claims act complies with the statutory requirements. Currently, 32 states and the District of Columbia have some form of state false claims acts. As of January 2013, the OIG has reviewed 28 of these and has granted many states a grace period, which expires on March 31, 2013, to amend their false claims acts to be consistent with recent changes in the federal False Claims Act. We operate in primarily 28 states, of which the following 21 states have some form of a state false claims act: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas and Washington.

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute is a provision of the Social Security Act that prohibits as a felony offense the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for, or to induce, (1) the referral of a patient for items or services for which payment may be made in whole or in part under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs, (2) the furnishing or arranging for the furnishing of items or services reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs or (3) the purchase, lease, or order or arranging or recommending the purchasing, leasing or ordering of any item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. ACA amended the Anti-Kickback Statute to make it clear that a person need not have actual knowledge of the Anti-Kickback statute, or specific intent to violate the statute, as a predicate for a violation. The OIG, which has the authority to impose administrative sanctions for violation of the statute, has adopted as its standard for review a judicial interpretation which concludes that the statute prohibits any arrangement where even one purpose of the remuneration is to induce or reward referrals. A violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute is a felony punishable by imprisonment, criminal fines of up to $25,000, civil fines of up to $50,000 per violation and three times the amount of the unlawful remuneration. A violation also can result in exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. In addition, pursuant to the changes of ACA, a claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute is a false claim for purposes of the False Claims Act.

Due to the breadth of the Anti-Kickback Statute’s broad prohibitions, statutory exceptions exist that protect certain arrangements from prosecution. In addition, the OIG has published safe harbor regulations that specify arrangements that also are deemed protected from prosecution under the Anti-Kickback Statute, provided all applicable criteria are met. The failure of an activity to meet all of the applicable safe harbor criteria does not necessarily mean that the particular arrangement violates the Anti-Kickback Statute, but these arrangements may be subject to scrutiny and prosecution by enforcement agencies.

Some states have enacted statutes and regulations similar to the Anti-Kickback Statute, but which may be applicable regardless of the payor source for the patient. These state laws may contain exceptions and safe harbors that are different from and/or more limited than those of the federal law and that may vary from state to state.

The federal Stark Law, also known as the physician self-referral law, prohibits a physician from referring Medicare patients to an entity (including hospitals) for the furnishing of “designated health services,” if the physician or a member of the physician’s immediate family has a direct or indirect “financial relationship” with the entity, unless a specific exception applies, and further prohibits the entity from billing for any services that arise out of such prohibited referrals. Certain of these provisions are applicable to the referral of Medicaid patients as well. Designated health services include the following services when they may be paid for by the Medicare program: inpatient and outpatient hospital services, clinical laboratory services, radiology and certain other imaging services, physical therapy services, occupational therapy services, and outpatient speech-language pathology services; durable medical equipment and supplies; outpatient prescription drugs; home health services; radiation services and supplies; parental and enteral nutrients, equipment and supplies; and prosthetics, orthotics, and prosthetic devices and supplies, all of which are services that our affiliated physicians may order. The prohibition applies regardless of the rationale for the financial relationship and the reason for ordering the service. Therefore, intent to commit an illegal act is not required in order for the government to prove that a physician has violated the Stark Law. Like the Anti-Kickback Statute, the Stark Law contains a number of statutory and regulatory exceptions that protect certain types of transactions and business arrangements from penalty. When the Stark Law applies to a referral, compliance with all elements of an applicable Stark Law exception is necessary in order to comply with the statute.

The penalties for violating the Stark Law include the denial of payment for services ordered in violation of the statute, mandatory refunds of any sums paid for such services, civil penalties of up to $15,000 for each violation, assessments up to three times the amount of each claim for Medicare reimbursement knowingly made for services ordered in violation of the statute, and possible exclusion from future participation in governmental healthcare programs. A physician or an entity that engages in a scheme to circumvent the Stark Law’s prohibitions may be fined up to $100,000 for each applicable arrangement or scheme. Knowing of a submission of a claim in violation of the Stark Law may also result in a False Claims Act allegation.

Some states have enacted statutes and regulations similar to the Stark Law, but which may be applicable to the referral of patients regardless of their payor source and which may apply to different types of services. These state laws may contain statutory and regulatory exceptions that are different from those of the federal law and that may vary from state to state.

Among other directives, the Administrative Simplification provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) required the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to adopt standards to protect the privacy and security of certain health-related information. The HIPAA privacy standards contain detailed requirements concerning the use and disclosure of certain individually identifiable protected health information (PHI) by “HIPAA covered entities,” which include entities like our affiliated hospitalists and practice groups.

In addition to the privacy requirements, there are also HIPAA security standards that require HIPAA covered entities to implement certain administrative, physical, and technical security standards to protect the integrity, confidentiality and availability of electronic PHI. HIPAA also implemented transaction standards that dictate the use of standard transaction formats, code sets and standard identifiers in connection with certain electronic healthcare transactions between health plans and health care providers, including activities associated with the billing and collection of healthcare claims.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act enacted on February 17, 2009, included the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) which modified the HIPAA legislation and regulations significantly. Pursuant to HITECH, certain provisions of the HIPAA privacy and security regulations are directly applicable to “HIPAA business associates,” which are vendors of covered entities that have access to PHI to perform a function on behalf of, or provide a service to, a covered entity. IPC qualifies as a HIPAA business associate when we work on behalf of our practice groups by providing management and consulting services involving the disclosure, use of and access to PHI. In addition, some of our practice groups perform administrative services for hospitals and other covered entities, such as medical directorship and utilization review services. These administrative services entail the disclosure, use of and access to PHI. In performing these administrative services, each of our practice groups qualifies as a business associate of the applicable covered entity.

We must also comply with “breach notification” regulations, which implement certain provisions of HITECH. On August 24, 2009, HHS published an interim final breach notification rule (Interim Final Breach Notification Rule) that implemented Section 13402 of HITECH. The Interim Final Breach Notification Rule requires HIPAA covered entities to provide notification to affected individuals and to the Secretary of HHS following the discovery of a breach of unsecured PHI. Additionally, media must be notified in cases where a breach affects 500 or more individuals in a state or jurisdiction. In the case of a breach of unsecured PHI at or by a business associate of a covered entity, the Interim Final Breach Notification Rule requires the business associate to notify the covered entity of the breach. The effective date of the Interim Final Breach Notification Rule was September 23, 2009, but HHS announced it would not impose fiscal sanctions with regard to breaches discovered before February 22, 2010.

On January 17, 2013, the Office for Civil Right (“OCR”) of HHS released an omnibus final rule (Final Rule) which made significant changes to the privacy standards, security standards, and the breach notification regulations. The provisions of the Final Rule are effective March 26, 2013, but covered entities and business associates generally have until September 23, 2013 to comply with its provisions. Additionally, there are transition provisions related to business associate agreements that grant covered entities and business associates a longer period to comply with the provisions of the Final Rule requiring amendment of business associate agreements if certain conditions apply.

The Final Rule also adopts certain changes to the HIPAA enforcement regulations to incorporate the increased and tiered civil monetary penalty structure provided by HITECH, originally published as an interim final rule on October 30, 2009. Most of the provisions of the Final Rule related to enforcement are effective and apply as of March 26, 2013, except as specifically provided in the Final Rule.

Among other important provisions, the Final Rule makes business associates of covered entities directly liable under HIPAA for compliance with certain of the HIPAA privacy standards and HIPAA security standards. Business associates are also liable for the HIPAA violations of their subcontractors that act as agents of the business associate. It also expands the rights of individuals to receive electronic copies of their health information. We will likely incur additional costs for system updates, training, and other resources required to implement these and other changes required by the Final Rule.

Further, the Final Rule replaces the “harm” threshold under the Interim Final Breach Notification Rule and supplants the Interim Final Breach Notification Rule. Under the Final Rule, in the event of a breach of unsecured PHI and in addition to reasonable remediation, covered entities and business associates must demonstrate and document whether there is a low probability that the PHI has been compromised in order to overcome the presumption that an impermissible use or disclosure of PHI results in a reportable breach. If a reportable breach occurs, the affected individual(s), HHS, and, in some cases, the media must be notified. In light of this increased regulation, we have taken steps to reduce the amount of unsecured PHI we handle and retain.

Violations of HIPAA are punishable by civil and criminal penalties. Historically, these included: (1) civil money penalties of $100 per incident, to a maximum of $25,000, per person, per year, per standard violated and (2) depending upon the nature of the violation, fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment for up to ten years. The passage of HITECH significantly modified the enforcement structure, creating a tiered system of civil money penalties that range from $100 to $50,000 per violation, with a cap of $1.5 million per year for all violations of an identical requirement or prohibition.

We expect increased federal and state HIPAA privacy and security enforcement efforts. Under HITECH, state attorney generals now have the right to prosecute HIPAA violations committed against residents of their states. In addition, HITECH mandates that the Secretary of HHS conduct periodic compliance audits of HIPAA covered entities and business associates. It also tasks HHS with establishing a methodology whereby harmed individuals who were the victims of breaches of unsecured PHI may receive a percentage of the civil monetary penalty fine or monetary settlement paid by the violator. This methodology for compensation to harmed individuals was required to be in place by February 17, 2012, but has yet to be implemented.

Many states in which we operate also have laws that protect the privacy and security of confidential, personal information. These laws may be similar to or even more stringent than the federal provisions. Not only may some of these state laws impose fines and penalties upon violators, but some may afford private rights of action to individuals who believe their personal information has been misused.

HITECH also enacted requirements related to the use of certified Electronic Health Records (EHRs), including incentive payments for early adoption and use of EHR. Beginning in 2015, Medicare will reduce payments to eligible professionals (EP) and facilities that do not meet an exception (such as the hospital-based EP or hardship exceptions) and are not in compliance with the EHR use requirements. Our patient medical records are maintained and under the custodianship of the healthcare facilities in which we operate.

In addition to privacy and security laws focused on health care data, multiple other federal and state laws regulate the use and disclosure of consumers’ financial information (Personal Information). Many of these laws also require administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to prevent unauthorized use or disclosure of Personal Information, including mandated processes and timeframes for notification of possible or actual breaches of Personal Information to the affected individual. The Federal Trade Commission primarily oversees compliance with the federal laws relevant to us, while state laws are addressed by the state attorney general or other accountable state agency. As with HIPAA, enforcement of laws protecting financial information is increasing. Examples of relevant federal laws include the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Some states have laws that prohibit business entities, such as IPC, from practicing medicine, employing physicians to practice medicine, exercising control over medical decisions by physicians, also known collectively as the corporate practice of medicine, or engaging in certain arrangements, such as fee-splitting, with physicians. In some states these prohibitions are expressly stated in a statute or regulation, while in other states the prohibition is a matter of judicial or regulatory interpretation. Of the states in which we currently operate, we believe that the following sixteen states prohibit the corporate practice of medicine to varying extents: California, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas and Washington.

In states that prohibit the corporate practice of medicine, we operate by maintaining long-term management contracts with affiliated professional organizations, each of which is owned and operated by a single shareholder and which employ or contract with additional physicians to provide hospitalist services. Under these arrangements, we perform only non-medical administrative services, do not represent that we offer medical services, and do not exercise influence or control over the practice of medicine by the physicians or the affiliated professional organizations.

For financial reporting purposes, however, we consolidate the revenues and expenses of all our practice groups that we own or manage because we have a controlling financial interest in these practices based on applicable accounting rules and as described in our accompanying consolidated financial statements. In states where fee-splitting is prohibited between physicians and non-physicians, the fees that we receive through our management contracts have been established on a basis that we believe complies with the applicable state laws.

Some of the relevant laws, regulations, and agency interpretations in the states in which we operate have been subject to limited judicial and regulatory interpretation. Moreover, state laws are subject to change and regulatory authorities and other parties, including our affiliated physicians, may assert that, despite these arrangements, we are engaged in the prohibited corporate practice of medicine or that our arrangements constitute unlawful fee-splitting. If this occurred, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, our contracts could be found legally invalid and unenforceable (in whole or in part), or we could be required to restructure our contractual arrangements.

Among other mandates, the DRA created a new Medicaid Integrity Program designed to enhance federal and state efforts to detect Medicaid fraud, waste and abuse. Additionally, section 6032 of the DRA requires entities that make or receive annual Medicaid payments of $5.0 million or more from any one state to provide their employees, contractors and agents with written policies and employee handbook materials on federal and state False Claims Acts and related statues. At this time, we are not required to comply with section 6032 because we receive less than $5.0 million in Medicaid payments annually from each state. However, we will likely be required to comply in the future as our Medicaid billings increase, but we cannot predict when that will occur. We also cannot predict what new state statutes or enforcement efforts may emerge from the DRA and what impact they may have on our operations.

In March 2010, the ACA was enacted. The ACA reflects sweeping legislation that, once fully implemented, may have a significant impact on our health care system generally, and the operations of our business. The ACA establishes Accountable Care Organizations which provide for financial rewards for complying with designated quality performance criteria, establishes a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovations to test innovative payment and service delivery models, potentially increases the number of insured individuals, increases enforcement penalties, and gives the federal government increasingly powerful tools to investigate and suspend or recoup funds and overpayments.

In 1995, Congress amended the federal criminal statutes set forth in Title 18 of the United States Code by defining additional federal crimes that could have an impact on our business, including “Health Care Fraud” and “False Statements Relating to Health Care Matters.” The Health Care Fraud provision prohibits any person from knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program. As defined in this provision of Title 18, a “health care benefit program” can be either a government or private payor plan. A violation of this statute may be charged as a felony offense and may result in fines, imprisonment or both. ACA amended section 1347 of Title 18 to provide that a person may be convicted under the Health Care Fraud provision even in the absence of proof that the person had actual knowledge of, or specific intent to violate, the statute.

The False Statements Relating to Health Care Matters provision prohibits, in any matter involving a health care benefit plan, anyone from knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up, by any trick, scheme or device, a material fact, or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation, or making or using any materially false writing or document knowing that it contains a materially false or fraudulent statement. A violation of this statute may be charged as a felony offense and may result in fines, imprisonment or both.

Under the Civil Monetary Penalties law of the Social Security Act, a person, including any individual or organization, may be subject to civil monetary penalties, treble damages and exclusion from participation in federal health care programs for certain specified conduct. One provision of the Civil Monetary Penalties law precludes any person (including an organization) from knowingly presenting or causing to be presented to any United States officer, employee, agent, or department, or any state agency, a claim for payment for medical or other items or services that the person knows or should know (a) were not provided as described in the coding of the claim, (b) is a false or fraudulent claim, (c) is for a service furnished by an unlicensed physician, (d) is for medical or other items or service furnished by a person or an entity that is in a period of exclusion from the program or (e) are medically unnecessary items or services. Violations of the law may result in penalties of up to $10,000 per claim, treble damages, and exclusion from federal healthcare programs. In addition, the OIG may impose civil monetary penalties against any physician who knowingly accepts payment from a hospital (as well as against the hospital making the payment) as an inducement to reduce or limit services provided to Medicare or Medicaid program beneficiaries.

In addition to the state laws previously described, we also are subject to other state fraud and abuse statutes and regulations. Many of the states in which we operate have adopted a form of anti-kickback law, self-referral prohibition, and false claims and insurance fraud prohibition. The scope of these laws and the interpretations of them vary from state to state and are enforced by state courts and regulatory authorities, each with broad discretion. Generally, state laws reach to all healthcare services and not just those covered under a governmental healthcare program. A determination of liability under any of these laws could result in fines and penalties and restrictions on our ability to operate in these states. We cannot assure that our arrangements or business practices will not be subject to government scrutiny or be found to violate applicable fraud and abuse laws.

Some of our operations may be subject to compliance with certain provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and comparable statutes in many states. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a third-party collection company is restricted in the methods it uses to contact consumer debtors and elicit payments with respect to placed accounts. Requirements under state collection agency statutes vary, with most requiring compliance similar to that required under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines are used by federal judges in determining sentences in federal criminal cases. The guidelines are advisory, not mandatory. With respect to corporations, the guidelines state that having an effective ethics and compliance program may be a relevant mitigating factor in determining sentencing. To comply with the guidelines, the compliance program must be reasonably designed, implemented, and enforced such that it is generally effective in preventing and detecting criminal conduct. The guidelines also state that a corporation should take certain steps such as periodic monitoring and appropriately responding to detected criminal conduct. OIG has followed the model of the Sentencing Guidelines in issuing its Compliance Guidances (which also are advisory, not mandatory). While we have attempted to develop and implement our corporate compliance program to be consistent with these guidelines, we cannot be certain that a court (or the OIG) would agree.

Our clinical personnel are subject to numerous federal, state and local licensing laws and regulations, relating to, among other things, professional credentialing and professional ethics. Since we perform services at hospitals and other types of healthcare facilities, we may indirectly be subject to laws applicable to those entities as well as ethical guidelines and operating standards of professional trade associations and private accreditation commissions, such as the American Medical Association and the Joint Commission. There are penalties for non-compliance with these laws and standards, including loss of professional license, civil or criminal fines and penalties, loss of hospital admitting privileges, federal health care program disenrollment, loss of billing privileges, and exclusion from participation in various governmental and other third-party healthcare programs.

Our affiliated hospitalists must satisfy and maintain their professional licensing in the states where they practice medicine. Activities that qualify as professional misconduct under state law may subject them to sanctions, or to even lose their license and could, possibly, subject us to sanctions as well. Some state boards of medicine impose reciprocal discipline, that is, if a physician is disciplined for having committed professional misconduct in one state where he or she is licensed, another state where he or she is also licensed may impose the same discipline even though the conduct occurred in another state. Professional licensing sanctions may also result in exclusion from participation in governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, as well as other third-party programs.

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from services rendered to beneficiaries of Medicare, Medicaid and other governmental healthcare programs. Participation in these programs requires compliance with stringent and often complex enrollment and reimbursement requirements. The applicable standards are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, and new interpretations of policy that may be difficult to predict and that may require significant changes to our operations.

We rely upon our affiliated hospitalists to appropriately and accurately complete necessary medical record documentation and assign appropriate reimbursement codes for their services. Reimbursement to us is conditioned on our affiliated hospitalists providing the correct procedure and diagnosis codes and properly documenting the services themselves, including the level of service provided, and the medical necessity for the services. If our affiliated hospitalists have provided incorrect or incomplete documentation or selected inaccurate reimbursement codes, this could result in nonpayment for services rendered or lead to allegations of billing fraud. This could subsequently lead to civil and criminal penalties, including exclusion from government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid.

Direct and indirect cost containment efforts at the state and federal level may materially impact reimbursement for our services. We believe these trends in cost containment will continue. The Medicare program reimburses for our services based upon the rates in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, and each year, the Medicare program updates the Physician Fee Schedule reimbursement rates. Many private payors use the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule to determine their own reimbursement rates. The current Medicare Physician Fee Schedule methodology has significantly reduced the overall reimbursement rates for physician services because it relies, in part, on a target-setting formula system called the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR). The SGR is a target rate of growth in spending for physician services which is intended to control the growth of Medicare expenditures for physicians’ services. Based on the SGR, the annual Medicare Physician Fee Schedule update is adjusted to reflect the comparison of actual expenditures to target expenditures. Because one of the factors for calculating the SGR is linked to the growth in the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), the SGR formula may result in a negative payment update if growth in Medicare beneficiaries’ use of services exceeds GDP growth, a

situation which has occurred in every year since 2002, the reoccurrence of which we cannot predict. With the enactment of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 on February 22, 2012, the implementation of the negative SGR payment update was again delayed until January 1, 2013, when the cut would have been 26.5 percent. Similarly, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 enacted on January 2, 2013 again delays the implementation of the negative SGR payment update until January 1, 2014. While Congress has repeatedly intervened to mitigate the negative reimbursement impact associated with the SGR formula, there is no guarantee that Congress will continue to do so in the future. Moreover, the existing methodology may result in significant yearly fluctuations in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule amounts, which may be unrelated to changes in the actual costs of providing physician services. Unless Congress enacts a change in the SGR methodology, the uncertainty regarding reimbursement rates and fluctuation will continue to exist.

See Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors Affecting Operating Results—Rate Changes by Government Sponsored Programs.”

Another provision that affects physician payments is an adjustment under the Medicare statute to reflect the geographic variation in the cost of delivering physician services, by comparing those costs to the national average. This concerns the “work” component of the Geographic Practice Cost Indices (GPCI). If Congress does not block this adjustment, payments would be decreased to any geographic area with an index of less than 1.0. In February 2012, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 was enacted and blocked the GPCI payment adjustment through the end of 2012. The enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 on January 2, 2013 again blocked the GPCI payment adjustment through the end of 2013. Although Congress has extended the work GPCI floor several times, there is no guarantee that Congress will block the adjustment in the future, which could result in a decrease in payments we receive for physician services.

Congress has a strong interest in reducing the federal debt, which may lead to new proposals designed to achieve savings by altering payment policies. The Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA) established a Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, which was tasked with achieving a reduction in the federal debt level of at least $1.2 trillion. That Committee did not draft a proposal by the BCA’s deadline. As a result, automatic cuts in various federal programs were scheduled to take place, beginning in January 2013. Although the Medicare program’s eligibility and scope of benefits are generally exempt from these cuts, Medicare payments to providers and Part D health plans are not exempt. The BCA did, however, provide that the Medicare cuts to providers and Part D health plans would not exceed two percent. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, signed into law on January 2, 2013, delayed the BCA’s automatic cuts until March 1, 2013. Thus, Congress and the White House will be forced to confront this matter again.

In fact, the situation with the federal budget remains in flux. First, if an agreement is not reached and legislation is not enacted by March 1, 2013, the BCA’s automatic cuts will go into effect, including the two percent cut in payments to providers and Part D health plans. Second, the appropriations law that is funding operations of the federal government will expire on March 27, 2013, and there may be a partial government shutdown if a new appropriations law is not enacted. Third, the statutory debt ceiling was reached on December 31, 2012. The Treasury Department was using what it calls “extraordinary measures” to avoid defaults by the federal government on its financial obligations, but the Treasury Department expected those measures to be exhausted at some point during the period mid-February to early March. Many Members of Congress have made public statements indicating that some or all of these budget-related deadlines should be used as leverage to negotiate additional cuts in federal spending. The Medicare program is frequently mentioned as a target for spending cuts.

Legislation was enacted on February 4, 2013 that suspends the statutory debt ceiling until May 19, 2013, and beginning on that date the Treasury Department is again expected to use extraordinary measures to delay a government default. This new law is a temporary measure that does not resolve the debt-limit issue. Moreover, it addresses only one of the three budget deadlines noted above. The bill does not affect Medicare’s status as a target for spending cuts.

The magnitude of Medicare cuts that may be made through budget agreements is unclear, including with respect to physician reimbursement. However, under our provider compensation plan, any decrease in reimbursement rates would reduce our physician incentive payments. For example, the BCA’s automatic two percent net reduction in Medicare reimbursement rates for the codes applicable to the services performed by our affiliated hospitalists could reduce our net income by approximately 0.2 percent.

Because governmental healthcare programs generally reimburse us on a fee schedule basis rather than on a charge-related basis, we generally cannot increase our revenues from these programs by increasing the amount we charge for our services. If our costs increase, we may not be able to recover our increased costs from these programs. Government and private payors have taken and may continue to take steps to control the cost, eligibility for, use and delivery of healthcare services as a result of budgetary constraints, cost containment pressures and other reasons. These cost containment measures and other market changes have generally restricted our ability to recover, or shift to non-governmental payors, any increased costs that we experience. Our business model and financial operations may be materially affected by these developments. Governmental healthcare programs, and other third-party payors, may disallow, in whole or in part, our requests for reimbursement based on determinations that certain amounts are not reimbursable, they were for services provided that were not medically necessary, there was a lack of sufficient supporting documentation, or for a number of other reasons. Additional factors that could complicate our billing include, but are not limited to:

We also are subject to governmental reviews and audits of our bills and claims for reimbursement. These reviews can occur before we are paid for services (pre-payment review) or after we have already received payment (post-payment review). Pre-payment reviews can lead to delays in reimbursement. In the context of post-payment reviews, we may be required to make retroactive adjustments to amounts previously paid to us if a finding is made that we were incorrectly reimbursed. The results of any of these types of reviews may cause us to lose eligibility for certain programs in the event of certain types of non-compliance or subject us to other fines or penalties. Also, some of our affiliated hospitalists may have to participate in payor re-education programs. Governmental healthcare programs are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations and determinations, all of which may materially increase or decrease the payments we receive for our services as well as affect the cost of providing services.

On January 16, 2009, HHS released the final rule mandating that HIPAA covered entities implement ICD-10 for medical coding on October 1, 2013. In a related final rule released the same day, HHS mandated that transaction standards for all electronic health-care claims switch to Version 5010 by January 1, 2012. However, on September 5, 2012, HHS published a final rule in which it changed the compliance date for implementation of the ICD-10 code sets from October 1, 2013 to October 1, 2014. We may incur additional costs for system updates, training, and other resources required to implement these changes.

Our future revenue could also be negatively impacted by Medicare e-prescribing requirements for physicians and non-physician practitioners who meet certain threshold requirements and who have not submitted e-prescribing services codes at designated levels. Although the majority of our physicians provide services which are hospital-based, some provide care in other post-acute care facilities, which may trigger these provisions. To meet these requirements, we may be required to invest in technologies and other resources, or accept reduced payments for services.

Similarly, other changes to the Medicare program may require IPC to make investments to receive maximum Medicare reimbursement for its services. These program revisions may include (but are not necessarily be limited to) the Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System, primary care bonus payments for eligible providers, the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, Payment Adjustments for Hospital Acquired Conditions, Physician Value-Based Purchasing, and electronic health record adoption incentives.

Our business could be adversely affected by reductions in or limitations of reimbursement amounts or rates under the governmental healthcare programs, reductions in funding of these programs or elimination of coverage for certain individuals or treatments under these programs. Other delays and uncertainties in the reimbursement process may adversely affect our level of accounts receivable, increase the overall cost of collection, adversely affect our working capital and cause us to incur additional borrowing costs. Unfavorable resolutions of future regulatory reviews or investigations, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We also receive compensation from non-governmental healthcare programs, or commercial payors. As with government payors, the manner and timing with which commercial payors reimburse us for our services may adversely affect our operations. We may be subject to, among other things, reductions or limitations in the reimbursement amounts or rates we receive, disallowances for services provided, pre-payment and post-payment audits, delays in payment, and delays or restrictions in our ability to credential new physicians.

Some of our relationships are pursuant to contracts with commercial payors that offer a wide variety of health insurance products, such as Health Maintenance Organizations, Preferred Provider Organizations, and Exclusive Provider Organizations. These organizations are subject to various state laws and regulations, including federal Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) requirements. We try to secure mutually agreeable contracts with payors that enable our affiliated hospitalists to be listed as in-network participants within the payors’ provider networks. Subject to applicable laws and regulations, the terms, conditions and compensation rates of our contracts with commercial third-party payors are negotiated and often vary widely across markets and among payors.

In some cases, our contracts with commercial payors provide for discounted fee-for-service arrangements and grant each party the right to terminate the contracts without cause upon prior written notice. If we do not have a contractual relationship with a health insurance payor, we generally bill the payor our full usual and customary charges. If payment is less than our full usual and customary charges, we bill the balance to the patient, subject to state and federal billing practice laws and regulations which prohibit balance billing in some jurisdictions. Although we maintain standard billing and collections procedures with appropriate discounts for prompt payment, we also provide discounts in certain hardship situations where patients and their families do not have financial resources necessary to pay the amount due for services rendered. Any amounts written-off related to self-pay patients are based on the specific facts and circumstances related to each individual patient account. We cannot guarantee that the rates of payment we receive will cover the costs of our services.

Political, economic and regulatory influences are continuing to subject the healthcare industry in the United States to fundamental change. We anticipate that Congress and state legislatures may continue to review and assess alternative healthcare delivery and payment systems and may in the future propose and adopt legislation effecting fundamental changes in the healthcare delivery system. Congress and state legislatures have adopted and may further consider statutory changes affecting healthcare reform. There can be no assurance as to the ultimate content, timing or effect of any healthcare reform legislation, nor is it possible at this time to estimate the impact of any potential legislation. It is possible that the changes to governmental healthcare program reimbursements may serve as precedent to possible changes in other payors’ reimbursement policies in a manner adverse to us. Similarly, changes in private payor reimbursements could lead to adverse changes in Medicare and other governmental healthcare programs which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are committed to complying with applicable state and federal laws and regulations governing the provision of healthcare services. In order to encourage a culture of compliance, we have operated a formal corporate compliance program since 1999. Our compliance officer and executive compliance committee are essential to implementation of our program. The members of the executive compliance committee include our senior officers and our compliance officer. All individuals affiliated with our organization (including the members of our board of directors) are bound by our compliance program.

Our compliance program is modeled after compliance guidance provided by the OIG, with specific attention to the OIG Compliance Program Guidance for Third-Party Medical Billing Companies (1998) and the OIG Compliance Program Guidance for Individual and Small Physician Practices (2000). The primary compliance program components the OIG has recommended, all of which we have implemented, include:

We regularly monitor updates from government enforcement entities and all payors that may pertain to the operation of our compliance program and our business. We adjust our compliance materials and company policies and procedures accordingly.

The goal of our compliance program is to prevent, detect, mitigate, respond to, and resolve regulatory risks. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that our program will detect and rectify all compliance issues in all markets and for all time periods.

As with other healthcare companies that operate corporate compliance programs, from time to time we identify practices that may have resulted in Medicare or Medicaid overpayments or other regulatory and payment issues. In such cases, it is our practice to comply with all legal obligations to disclose the issue to the respective programs and, if appropriate, to refund any resulting overpayments. While such disclosures and repayments are usually accepted without further action, it is possible that such disclosures and repayments will result in allegations that we have violated applicable laws, regulations, or payor guidance, leading to investigations and possible civil or criminal enforcement actions.

Under ACA, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will require compliance plans as a condition of enrollment for providers and suppliers in the Medicare, Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance programs. CMS has not yet issued regulations indicating how it will implement this provision of the statute. When such guidance is issued, we may be required to revise our compliance program to meet these new requirements for mandatory programs, and our affiliated hospitalists and other practitioners may be subject to new compliance requirements at the locations where they perform services.

The following are important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. In addition, the risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Unforeseen risks could arise and problems or issues that we now view as minor could become more significant. If we are unable to adequately respond to these risks and uncertainties, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Additionally, we cannot be certain or give any assurances that any actions taken to reduce known risks and uncertainties will be effective.

The healthcare industry is complex and intensely regulated at the federal, state, and local levels and government authorities may determine that we have failed to comply with applicable laws or regulations.

As a company involved in the provision of healthcare services, we are subject to a myriad of federal, state, and local laws and regulations. There are significant costs involved in complying with these laws and regulations. Moreover, if we are found to have violated any applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to civil and/or criminal damages, fines, sanctions, or penalties, including exclusion from participation in governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. We may also be required to change our method of operations. These consequences could be the result of current conduct or even conduct that occurred a number of years ago. We also could incur significant costs merely if we become the subject of an additional investigation or legal proceeding alleging a violation of these laws and regulations. We cannot predict whether a federal, state, or local government will determine that we are not operating in accordance with law, or whether the laws will change in the future and impact our business. Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of some of the more significant healthcare laws and regulations that affect us:

Providers in the healthcare industry are the subject of federal and state investigations, as well as payor audits.

Due to our participation in government and private healthcare programs, we are sometimes involved in inquiries, reviews, audits and investigations by governmental agencies and private payors of our business practices, including assessments of our compliance with coding, billing and documentation requirements. Federal and state government agencies have active civil and criminal enforcement efforts that include investigations of healthcare companies, and their executives and managers. Under certain circumstances, these investigations can also be initiated by private individuals under whistleblower provisions which may be incentivized by the possibility for private recoveries. The DRA revised federal law to further encourage these federal, state and individually-initiated investigations against healthcare companies.

Responding to these audit and enforcement activities can be costly and disruptive to our business operations, even when the allegations are without merit. If we are subject to an audit or investigation and a finding is made that we were incorrectly reimbursed, we may be required to repay these agencies or private payors, or we may be subjected to pre-payment reviews, which can be time-consuming and result in non-payment or delayed payment for the services we provide. We also may be subject to other financial sanctions or be required to modify our operations.

Our revenue may be negatively impacted by the failure of our affiliated hospitalists to appropriately document services they provide.

This could subsequently lead to civil and criminal penalties, including exclusion from government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, third-party payors may disallow, in whole or in part, requests for reimbursement based on determinations that certain amounts are not covered, services provided were not medically necessary, or supporting documentation was not adequate. Retroactive adjustments may change amounts realized from third-party payors and result in recoupments or refund demands, affecting revenue already received.

Our business model includes the use of physician assistants and nurse practitioners (Midlevel Practitioners), which implicates supervision and documentation requirements, as well as additional billing rules which may not be applicable to physicians.

We utilize Midlevel Practitioners to provide care under the supervision of our physicians. State and federal laws require that such supervision be performed and documented using specific procedures. For example, in some states some or all of the Midlevel Practitioner’s chart entries must be countersigned. Under applicable Medicare rules, in certain cases, a Midlevel Practitioner’s services are reimbursed at a rate equal to 85% of the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule amount. However, in certain circumstances when a Midlevel Practitioner assists a physician who is directly and personally involved in the patient’s care, we may bill for the services of the physician at the full Medicare Physician Fee Schedule rates and do not bill separately for the Midlevel Practitioner’s services. We believe our billing and documentation practices related to our use of Midlevel Practitioners comply with applicable state and federal laws, but we cannot assure you that enforcement authorities will not find that our practices violate such laws.

Compliance with federal and state privacy and information security laws is expensive, and we may be subject to government or private actions due to privacy and security breaches.

We must comply with numerous federal and state laws and regulations governing the collection, dissemination, access, use, security and confidentiality of PHI, including HIPAA and HITECH. As part of our medical record keeping, third-party billing, and other services, we collect and maintain PHI in paper and electronic format. Our IPC-Link ^® platform relies heavily on the electronic exchange of PHI. Therefore, new privacy or security laws, whether implemented pursuant to federal or state action, could have a significant effect on the manner in which we handle healthcare-related data and communicate with payors, and compliance with these standards could impose significant costs on us or limit our ability to offer services, thereby negatively impacting the business opportunities available to us. Despite our efforts to prevent security and privacy breaches, they may still occur, especially with IPC-Link^®. If any non-compliance with existing or new laws and regulations related to PHI results in privacy or security breaches, we could be subject to monetary fines, civil suits, civil penalties or even criminal sanctions.

As a result of the expanded scope of HIPAA through HITECH, we may incur significant costs in order to minimize the amount of “unsecured PHI” we handle and retain or to implement improved administrative, technical or physical safeguards to protect PHI. We may incur significant costs in order to demonstrate and document whether there is a low probability that the PHI has been compromised in order to overcome the presumption that an impermissible use or disclosure of PHI results in a reportable breach. We may incur significant costs to notify the relevant individuals, government entities, and, in some cases, the media in the event of a breach and to provide appropriate remediation and monitoring to mitigate the possible damage done by any such breach.

Providers must be properly enrolled in governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, before they can receive reimbursement for providing services, and there may be delays in the enrollment process.

Each time a new affiliated hospitalist joins us, we must enroll the affiliated hospitalist under our applicable group identification number for Medicare and Medicaid programs and for certain managed care and private insurance programs before we can receive reimbursement for services the hospitalist renders to beneficiaries of those programs. The estimated time to receive approval for the enrollment is sometimes difficult to predict and, in recent years, the Medicare program carriers often have not issued these numbers to our affiliated hospitalists in a timely manner. These practices result in delayed reimbursement that may adversely affect our cash flow and revenues.

We may face malpractice and other lawsuits that may not be covered by insurance.

Malpractice lawsuits are common in the healthcare industry. The medical malpractice legal environment varies greatly by state. The status of tort reform, availability of non-economic damages or the presence or absence of other statutes, such as elder abuse or vulnerable adult statutes, influence the incidence and severity of malpractice litigation. We may also be subject to other types of lawsuits which may involve large claims and significant defense costs. Many states have joint and several liability for all healthcare providers who deliver care to a patient and are at least partially liable. As a result, if one healthcare provider is found liable for medical malpractice for the provision of care to a particular patient, all other healthcare providers who furnished care to that same patient, including possibly our affiliated hospitalists, may also share in the full liability which may be substantial.

We currently maintain liability insurance coverage to cover professional liability and other claims. We cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us, our affiliated professional organizations or our affiliated hospitalists, and we cannot provide assurance that any future liabilities will not have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage, including coverage for professional liability and other claims, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, our professional liability insurance coverage generally must be renewed annually and may not continue to be available to us in future years at acceptable costs and on favorable terms.

We have established reserves for potential medical malpractice liability losses which are subject to inherent uncertainties and a deficiency in the established reserves may lead to a reduction in our net income.

Our professional liability insurance policy, which ends December 31 of each year, is written on a claims-made basis providing first dollar coverage up to our policy limits on new claims reported in the policy period. We record estimates for our liabilities, on an undiscounted basis, for claims incurred and reported and claims incurred but not reported during the policy period, based on actuarial loss projections using historical loss patterns. These insurance reserves are inherently subject to uncertainty as they could be significantly affected if current and future occurrences differ from historical claim trends and expectations. While claims are monitored closely when estimating reserves, the complexity of the claims and wide range of potential outcomes often hampers timely adjustments to the assumptions used in these estimates. The unpredictable nature of the reporting of claims could result in significant fluctuations in the loss estimate from period to period. It is possible that actual losses and related expenses may differ, perhaps substantially, from the reserve estimates reflected in our financial statements. If subsequent actual paid claims exceed our estimated reserves, we may be required to increase reserves, which would lead to a reduction in our future net income.

Competition for hospitalists is intense, and we may not be able to hire and retain hospitalists to provide services.

We are dependent on our affiliated hospitalists to provide services and generate revenue. We compete with many types of healthcare providers, including teaching, research and government institutions, hospitals and other practice groups, for the services of clinicians. The limited number of residents entering the job market each year and the limited number of other licensed providers seeking to change employers makes it challenging to meet our hiring needs and may require us to contract locum tenen physicians or to increase hospitalist compensation in a manner that decreases our profit margins. The limited number of residents and other licensed providers also impacts our ability to recruit new hospitalists with the expertise necessary to provide services within our business and our ability to renew contracts with existing hospitalists on acceptable terms. If we do not do so, our ability to provide services could be adversely affected. Our hospitalist turnover rate has remained stable over the last three years. If the turnover rate were to increase significantly, our growth could be impeded.

We may be unable to enforce the non-competition covenants of departed affiliated hospitalists.

We usually enter into employment agreements with our affiliated hospitalists which typically can be terminated without cause by either party upon prior written notice. The law governing enforcement of non-compete agreements and other forms of restrictive covenants varies from state to state. Where it is allowed by applicable state law to do so, substantially all of our affiliated hospitalists have agreed not to compete within a specified geographic area and at specific facilities for a one year period after termination of employment.

Although we believe that the non-competition and other restrictive covenants of our affiliated hospitalists are reasonable in scope and duration and therefore enforceable under applicable state law, courts and arbitrators in some states are reluctant to strictly enforce non-compete agreements and restrictive covenants applicable to physicians. If a substantial number of our affiliated hospitalists leave and we are unable to enforce the non-competition covenants in the employment agreements, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. We cannot predict whether a court or arbitration panel would enforce these covenants and it could be costly to enforce such covenants.

Restrictions on immigration may affect our ability to compete for and provide services to our clients, which could adversely affect our ability to meet growth and revenue targets.

While all of our affiliated hospitalists have completed residencies in the United States, as of December 31, 2012, approximately 13% of our employed hospitalists were not U.S. citizens. The ability of these affiliated hospitalists to work in the United States depends on our ability to obtain the necessary work visas and work permits. Existing and proposed limitations on, and eligibility restrictions for, these visas could have a significant impact on our ability to recruit hospitalists. Further, in response to recent global political events, the level of scrutiny in granting visas has increased. New security procedures may delay the issuance of visas and affect our ability to hire hospitalists in a timely manner.

Our reliance on work visas for a number of our affiliated hospitalists makes us particularly vulnerable to legislative changes and strict enforcement of new national security procedures, as it affects our ability to hire hospitalists who are not U.S. citizens. If we are not able to obtain a sufficient number of visas for these affiliated hospitalists or encounter delays or additional costs in obtaining or maintaining such visas, our ability to recruit and retain hospitalists and meet our growth and revenue targets could be adversely affected.

We may not make appropriate acquisitions, may fail to integrate them into our business, and/or these acquisitions may alter our current payor mix.

Our business is partially dependent on locating and acquiring or partnering with medical practices or individual physicians to provide hospitalist services. As part of our acquisition strategy, we regularly review potential acquisition opportunities. We believe that there continue to be a number of acquisition opportunities that would be complementary to our business. We cannot predict whether we will be successful in pursuing such acquisition opportunities or what the consequences of any such acquisitions would be. If we are not successful in finding attractive acquisition candidates that we can acquire on satisfactory terms, or if we cannot successfully complete and efficiently integrate those acquisitions that we identify, we will not be able to realize the benefit of this part of our growth strategy. Furthermore, our acquisition strategy involves a number of risks and uncertainties, including:

Changes to the fair value of contingent consideration to be paid in connection with our acquisitions of physician practices may result in significant fluctuations to our results of operations.

In connection with our acquisition of physician practices, we have an established liability of $28.8 million as of December 31, 2012 representing our estimate of the fair value of contingent consideration to be paid. The fair value of such contingent considerations is re-evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in our estimate of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. Any changes in our estimated fair value are recognized in our results of operations. Because contingent consideration is generally based on multiples of operating results of the acquired practices during a measurement period, changes to our estimate of projected operating results of the acquired practices may have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations.

Changes in the rates or methods of third-party reimbursements may adversely affect our operations.

We derive the majority of our revenue from direct billings to governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and private health insurance companies. As a result, any negative changes in the rates or methods of reimbursement for the services we provide would have a significant adverse impact on our revenue and financial results. Government funding for healthcare programs, in particular, is subject to unpredictable statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, interpretations of policy and determinations by intermediaries, and governmental funding restrictions, all of which could materially impact program coverage and reimbursements for our services.

The Medicare program reimburses for our services based upon the rates set forth in the annually updated Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, which relies, in part, on the SGR. Many private payors use the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule to determine their own reimbursement rates. Based on the SGR, the annual Medicare Physician Fee Schedule update is adjusted to reflect the comparison of actual expenditures to target expenditures. Because one of the factors for calculating the SGR is linked to the growth in the U.S. GDP, the SGR formula may result in a negative payment update if growth in Medicare beneficiaries’ use of services exceeds GDP growth, a situation which has occurred every year since 2002 and the reoccurrence of which we cannot predict.

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 delayed implementation of the negative SGR payment update, again, until January 1, 2013, when the cut would have been 26.5 percent. Similarly, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, enacted on January 2, 2013 delays the implementation of the negative SGR payment update until January 1, 2014. While Congress has repeatedly intervened to mitigate the negative reimbursement impact associated with the SGR formula, there is no guarantee that Congress will continue to do so in the future. Moreover, the existing methodology may result in significant yearly fluctuations in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule amounts, which may be unrelated to changes in the actual costs of providing physician services. Unless Congress enacts a change in the SGR methodology, the uncertainty regarding reimbursement rates and fluctuation will continue to exist.

Another provision that affects physician payments is an adjustment under the Medicare statute to reflect the geographic variation in the cost of delivering physician services, by comparing those costs to the national average. This concerns the “work” component of the GPCI. If Congress does not block this adjustment, payments would be decreased to any geographic area with an index of less than 1.0. The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 prevented the GPCI payment adjustment through the end of 2012. With enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 on January 2, 2013, again, the GPCI payment adjustment has been delayed through the end of 2013. Although Congress has delayed the GPCI payment adjustment several times, there is no guarantee that Congress will block the adjustment in the future, which could result in a decrease in payments we receive for physician services.

Congress has a strong interest in reducing the federal debt, which may lead to new proposals designed to achieve savings by altering payment policies. The BCA established a Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, which was tasked with achieving a reduction in the federal debt level of at least $1.2 trillion. That Committee did not draft a proposal by the BCA’s deadline. As a result, automatic cuts in various federal programs were scheduled to take place, beginning in January 2013. Although the Medicare program’s eligibility and scope of benefits are generally exempt from these cuts, Medicare payments to providers are not exempt. The BCA did, however, provide that the Medicare cuts to providers would not exceed two percent. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, signed into law on January 2, 2013, delayed the BCA’s automatic cuts until March 1, 2013. Thus, Congress and the White House will be forced to confront this matter again.

Because governmental healthcare programs generally reimburse on a fee schedule basis rather than on a charge-related basis, we generally cannot increase our revenues from these programs by increasing the amount we charge for our services. If our costs increase, we may not be able to recover our increased costs from these programs. Government and private payors have taken and may continue to take steps to control the cost, eligibility for, use and delivery of healthcare services as a result of budgetary constraints, cost containment pressures and other reasons. We believe that these trends in cost containment will continue. These cost containment measures and other market changes in non-governmental insurance plans have generally restricted our ability to recover, or shift to non-governmental payors, any increased costs that we experience. Our business and financial operations may be materially affected by these developments.

If we inadvertently employ or contract with an excluded person, we may face government sanctions.

Individuals and entities can be excluded from participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs for violating certain laws and regulations, or for other reasons such as the loss of a license in any state, even if the individual retains other licensure. This means that they (and all others) are prohibited from receiving payment for their services rendered to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries, and if the excluded individual is a physician, all services ordered (not just provided) by such physician are also non-covered and non-payable. Entities which employ or contract with excluded individuals are prohibited from billing the Medicare or Medicaid programs for the excluded individual’s services, and are subject to civil monetary penalties if they do. The OIG maintains a list of excluded individuals and entities. Although we have instituted policies and procedures through our compliance program to minimize the risks, there can be no assurance that we will not inadvertently hire or contract with an excluded person, or that any of our current employees or contracts will not become excluded in the future without our knowledge. If this occurs, we may be subject to substantial repayments and civil penalties and the hospitals at which we furnish services also may be subject to repayments and sanctions, for which they may seek recovery from us.

There are other companies and individuals currently providing hospitalist services. We compete directly with national, regional and local providers of inpatient healthcare, and other companies could enter the market in the future and divert some or all of our business. On a national basis our competitors include Team Health and EmCare, each of which may have greater financial and other resources available to them. We also compete with hospitalist groups and privately-owned hospitalist companies in each of our local markets. Existing or future competitors also may seek to compete with us for acquisitions, which could have the effect of increasing the price and reducing the number of suitable acquisitions, which would have an adverse impact on our growth strategy. Since there are virtually no capital expenditures required to enter the industry, there are few financial barriers to entry. Individual physicians, physician groups and companies in other healthcare industry segments, including hospitals with which we have contracts, some of which have greater financial, marketing and staffing resources, may become competitors in providing hospitalist services and this competition may have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial position.

Because patients do not typically select their hospitalists, we are completely reliant on referrals from third parties.

Our business is based on referrals for our services. We receive referrals from community medical providers, emergency departments, payors, and hospitals in the same manner as other medical professionals receive patient referrals. We do not provide compensation or other remuneration to our referral sources for referring patients to us. A decrease in these referrals due to competition, concerns about the quality of our services, and other factors could result in a significant decrease in our revenues and adversely impact our financial condition. Similarly, we cannot assure that we will be able to obtain or maintain preferred provider status with significant third-party payors in the communities where we operate. If we are unable to maintain our referral base or our preferred provider status with significant third-party payors, it may negatively impact our revenues and our financial performance.

Hospitals may terminate their agreements with us or reduce the fees they pay us.

We currently derive approximately 6% of our net revenue from contracts directly with hospitals for hospitalist services. Our current partner hospitals may decide not to renew our contracts, introduce unfavorable terms, or reduce fees paid to us. Any of these events may impact the ability of our practice groups to operate at such hospitals, which would negatively impact our revenue and profitability.

Some of the hospitals where our affiliated hospitalists provide services may have their medical staff closed to non-contracted hospitalists.

In general, our affiliated hospitalists may only provide services in a hospital where they have certain credentials, called privileges, which are granted by the medical staff and controlled by legally binding medical staff bylaws of the hospital. The medical staff decides who will receive privileges, and the medical staff of the hospitals where we currently provide services or wish to provide services could decide that non-contracted hospitalists can no longer receive privileges to practice there. Such a decision would limit our ability to furnish services in a hospital, decrease the number of our affiliated hospitalists who could provide services, or preclude us from entering new hospitals. In addition, hospitals may attempt to enter into exclusive contracts for hospitalist services, which would reduce access to certain populations of patients within the hospital.

Many states prohibit business entities from owning or controlling medical practices.

The laws in many of the states in which we operate, or may operate in the future, prohibit business entities from practicing medicine and from exercising control over or employing physicians who practice medicine. This corporate practice of medicine prohibition is intended to prevent unlicensed persons from interfering with or inappropriately influencing the physician’s professional judgment. These and other laws may also prevent fee-splitting, which is the sharing of professional service income with non-professional or business interests. The interpretation and enforcement of these laws vary significantly from state to state. There is a risk that state authorities or courts may find that our relationships with our affiliated hospitalists and our practice groups violate state corporate practice of medicine and fee-splitting prohibitions. In addition, authorities or courts could determine that we have not complied with new laws which may be enacted, rendering our arrangements illegal. If any of these events occur, we may be subject to fines and penalties, and changes in our business model may be required.

We may be impacted by eligibility changes to government and private insurance programs.

Due to potential decreased availability of healthcare through private employers, the number of patients who are uninsured or participate in governmental programs may increase. A shift in payor mix from managed care and other private payors to government payors or the uninsured may result in a reduction in our rates of reimbursement or an increase in our uncollectible receivables or uncompensated care, with a corresponding decrease in our net revenue. Changes in the eligibility requirements for governmental programs also could increase the number of patients who participate in such programs or the number of uninsured patients. Even for those patients who remain with private insurance, changes in those programs could increase patient responsibility amounts, resulting in a greater risk for us of uncollectible receivables. These factors and events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may have difficulty collecting payments from third-party payors in a timely manner.

We derive significant revenue from third-party payors, and delays in payment or audits leading to refunds to payors may impact our net revenue. We assume the financial risks relating to uncollectible and delayed payments. In the current healthcare environment, payors are continuing their efforts to control expenditures for healthcare, including proposals to revise coverage and reimbursement policies. We may experience difficulties in collecting our revenue because third-party payors may seek to reduce or delay payment to which we believe we are entitled. If we are not paid fully and in a timely manner for such services or there is a finding that we were incorrectly paid, our revenues, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Certain federal and state laws may limit our effectiveness at collecting monies owed to us from patients.

We utilize third parties to collect from patients any co-payments and other payments for services that our hospitalists provide to patients. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act restricts the methods that third-party collection companies may use to contact and seek payment from consumer debtors regarding past due accounts. State laws vary with respect to debt collection practices, although most state requirements are similar to those under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. If our collection practices or those of our collection agencies are inconsistent with these standards, we may be subject to actual damages and penalties. These factors and events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Unfavorable changes or conditions could occur in the states where our operations are concentrated.

Approximately 60% of our net revenue in 2012 was generated by our operations in five states. Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Missouri and Texas accounted for approximately 11%, 17%, 10%, 6%, and 16%, respectively, of our revenue in 2012. Adverse changes or conditions affecting these states where our operations are concentrated, such as healthcare reforms, changes in laws and regulations, reduced Medicaid reimbursements and government investigations, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to effectively adapt to changes in the healthcare industry, our business may be harmed.

Due to the importance of the healthcare industry in the lives of all Americans, federal, state, and local legislative bodies frequently pass legislation and promulgate regulations relating to healthcare reform. It is reasonable to believe that there may be increased federal oversight and regulation of the healthcare industry in the future. We cannot assure you as to the ultimate content, timing or effect of any healthcare reform legislation, nor is it possible at this time to estimate the impact of potential legislation on our business. It is possible that future legislation enacted by Congress or state legislatures could adversely affect our business or could change the operating environment of hospitals and other facilities where our hospitalists provide services. It is possible that the changes to the Medicare or other governmental healthcare program reimbursements may serve as precedent to possible changes in other payors’ reimbursement policies in a manner adverse to us. Similarly, changes in private payor reimbursements could lead to adverse changes in Medicare and other governmental healthcare programs which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business model depends on numerous complex management information systems, and any failure to successfully maintain these systems or implement new systems could materially harm our operations and result in potential violations of healthcare laws and regulations.

We depend on a complex, specialized, integrated management information system and standardized procedures for operational and financial information, as well as for our billing operations. We may be unable to enhance our existing management information systems or implement new management information systems where necessary. Additionally, we may experience unanticipated delays, complications, or expenses in implementing, integrating, and operating our systems. Our management information systems may require modifications, improvements, or replacements that may require both substantial expenditures as well as interruptions in operations. Our ability to implement these systems is subject to the availability of information technology and skilled personnel to assist us in creating and implementing these systems. Our failure to successfully implement and maintain all of our systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, our failure to successfully operate our billing systems could lead to potential violations of healthcare laws and regulations.

We may incur significant costs if we are required to adopt certain provisions under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act.

HITECH was enacted into law on February 17, 2009 as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Among the many provisions of HITECH are those relating to the implementation and use of certified Electronic Health Records (EHRs). Our patient medical records are maintained and under the custodianship of the healthcare facilities in which we operate. However, if we are required to adopt the use of EHRs utilized by these healthcare facilities, determine to adopt certain EHRs, or comply with any related provisions of HITECH, we may incur significant costs which could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial position.

We are dependent upon our key management personnel for our future success.

Our success depends to a significant extent on the continued contributions of our key management personnel, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Adam D. Singer, M.D., for the management of our business and implementation of our business strategy. We have entered into employment agreements with Dr. Singer as well as our other named executive officers. Our agreement with Dr. Singer has a three year term and the agreements with our other named executive officers have one year terms, in each case, subject to automatic renewals. We maintain key man life insurance on Dr. Singer in the amount of $3.0 million and IPC is the designated beneficiary of such policy. The loss of Dr. Singer or other key management personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have experienced significant growth in our business and personnel over the years which we expect to continue. For example, from 2010 to 2012 our annual patient encounters increased from 3,810,000 to 5,496,000 and we increased our number of hospitalists from 1,032 to 1,418. We have managed this growth by augmenting the staff of our corporate office and the staff of our 32 operating regions. However, we may be unable to effectively manage this growth going forward with respect to appropriate hiring, training and oversight of personnel, or appropriate integration into our systems. These events could materially adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and if we are unable to protect them or are subject to intellectual property rights claims, our business may be harmed.

Our intellectual property rights, including those rights related to IPC-Link^® and certain trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, are important assets for us. We do not hold any patents protecting our intellectual property. Various events outside of our control pose a threat to our intellectual property rights as well as to our business. For example, we may be subject to third-party intellectual property rights claims, and our technologies may not be able to withstand any such claims. Regardless of the merits of the claims, any intellectual property claims could be time-consuming and expensive to litigate or settle. In addition, if any claims against us are successful, we may have to pay substantial monetary damages or discontinue any of our practices that are found to be in violation of another party’s rights. We also may have to seek a license to continue such practices, which may significantly increase our operating expenses or may not be available to us at all. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business or our ability to compete.

We may require additional equity or debt financing for additional working capital for expansion, to consummate acquisitions or if we suffer significant losses. In the event of additional financing is unavailable to us, we may be unable to expand or make acquisitions and the price of our common stock may decline.

The terms of our debt agreement could restrict our operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes in our business or to take specified actions.

Our existing secured debt agreement contains, and any future indebtedness would likely contain, a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to take actions that may be in our best interests. Our existing debt agreement includes covenants, including requirements that:

Our intangible assets, which consist primarily of goodwill related to our acquisitions, are subject to annual impairment testing. Under current accounting standards, goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and we may be subject to impairment losses as circumstances change after an acquisition. If we record an impairment loss related to our goodwill, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the year in which the impairment is recorded. The amount of goodwill recorded at December 31, 2012 is $240.0 million as compared to stockholders’ equity of $256.4 million.

Our quarterly results will likely fluctuate from period to period, which could increase the volatility in the price of our common stock.

We have historically experienced and expect to continue to experience quarterly fluctuations in revenue and net income. Absent the impact and timing of acquisitions, our net revenue has historically been higher in the first and fourth quarters of the year primarily due to the following factors:

As a result of the fluctuations caused by these factors and due to the timing of acquisitions, our results of operations for any quarter are not indicative of results of operations for any future period or full year. These variations in our results of operations could contribute to volatility in the price of our common stock. In addition, we have significant fixed operating costs, including physician practice salaries and benefits and, as a result, are highly dependent on patient encounters and the productivity of our affiliated hospitalists to sustain profitability.

Provisions in our charter documents could limit another party’s ability to acquire us and deprive our investors of the opportunity to obtain a takeover premium for their securities.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain several provisions that may make it substantially more difficult for a third-party to acquire us. This may make it more difficult or expensive for a third-party to acquire a majority of our outstanding common stock. These provisions also may delay, prevent or deter a merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest or other transaction that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a premium over the market price for their common stock.

Our ability to designate the rights and preferences of undesignated preferred stock could result in the issuance of stock with rights and preferences that are superior to those of your shares, which could reduce the value of your investment.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to designate by resolution, different classes and/or series of stock from the 15,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized. Our board of directors is also empowered to fix the relative rights, preferences, privileges and limitations of each class or series of preferred stock. This means that our board of directors may issue shares of preferred stock with rights and preferences, including, among other things, dividend, liquidation, redemption and voting rights that are superior to the rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of our common stock. In addition, we may issue other securities, such as convertible promissory notes, that may have rights and preferences that are superior to those of the shares of our common stock. In addition, our board of directors has the ability, without further stockholder approval, to issue additional shares of our common stock and securities exercisable for, convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our authorized

capital stock. The ability of our board of directors to designate the rights and preferences of the preferred stock could impede or deter an unsolicited tender offer, merger or takeover of our business, or make a change of control of our company difficult to accomplish. In addition, the issuance of shares of our common stock or other securities having rights and preferences superior to those of the shares of common stock being offered could reduce the value of our common stock.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock, which means that capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be our stockholders’ only source of gain.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our current, as well as any future, financing agreements may preclude us from paying any dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be our stockholders’ sole source of potential gain for the foreseeable future.

We lease office space in North Hollywood, California for our corporate headquarters. The lease will expire in December 2013. In addition, we lease a number of administrative offices in connection with our regional offices in particular markets. We believe our present facilities are adequate to meet our current and projected needs. We do not view any of these leases or locations for administrative offices as material to our business. We expect to be able to renew each of our leases or lease comparable facilities on terms commercially acceptable to us.

We believe, based upon our review of pending actions and proceedings, that the outcome of such legal actions and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of such actions and proceedings, however, cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows in a future period.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Select Global Market under the symbol “IPCM.” Following is a table presenting the high and low closing sales prices on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for a share of our common stock by fiscal quarter for fiscal years 2012 and 2011:

As of February 18, 2013, we had 111 holders of record of our common stock, and the closing price on that date for our common stock was $44.04 per share. Because our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial owners represented by these stockholders of record.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. The payment of dividends is within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, capital requirements and operating and financial position, among other factors. We expect to retain all of our earnings to finance the expansion and development of our business, and we currently have no plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, our existing credit facility limits, and any future debt agreements may restrict, our ability to pay dividends.

The following graph illustrates a comparison of the total cumulative stockholder return on our common stock since January 25, 2008, which is the date our common stock first began trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, to two indices: NASDAQ Healthcare Index and Russell 2000 Index Total Return. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 on January 25, 2008. The comparisons in the graph are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock.

Note 2: Peer group indices use beginning of period market capitalization weighting.

Note 4: Index Data: Calculated (or Derived) based from CRSP NASDAQ Health Services Index, Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP^®), Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago. Copyright 2013. Used with permission. All rights reserved.

Information required by this item with respect to our equity compensation plans will be contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC and is hereby incorporated by reference.

We derived the following selected consolidated financial data for the five years ended December 31, 2012 from our audited consolidated financial statements. You should read the data in conjunction with Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included herein. Historical results of operations and financial position are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future periods.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion highlights the principal factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operations as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to known and unknown risks. Actual results and the timing of events may differ significantly from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Report. The operating results for the periods presented were not significantly affected by inflation.

We are a leading provider of hospitalist services in the United States. Hospitalist medicine is organized around inpatient care, primarily delivered in hospitals, and is focused on providing, managing and coordinating the care of hospitalized patients. We believe we are the largest dedicated hospitalist company in the United States based on revenues, patient encounters and number of affiliated hospitalists. As of December 31, 2012, either through our wholly-owned subsidiaries or our affiliated professional organizations, we employ or affiliate with over 1,410 hospitalists who provide hospitalist services at over 350 hospitals and 810 other patient and post-acute care facilities in 28 states. We have had 14.1 million patient encounters since the beginning of 2010. Our early entry into the emerging hospitalist industry has permitted us to establish a reputation and leadership position that we believe is closely identified with hospitalist medicine.

We began operating our first hospitalist practice in 1998 and have increased the number of our practice groups to over 255. Since the beginning of 2010, we have acquired 43 practice groups and successfully integrated them into IPC and onto IPC-Link^®, our proprietary technology-based management system. Our affiliated hospitalists are primarily full-time employees of our wholly-owned subsidiaries or our affiliated professional organizations. We also employ over 660 other physicians and non-physician providers and contract with over 210 independent contractors, who provide episodic care as needed.

Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we completed the acquisition of the assets of one hospitalist physician practice.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, we acquired the assets of 15 hospitalist physician practices for a total estimated purchase price of $67,595,000. In connection with these acquisitions, we recorded goodwill of $66,321,000, property and equipment of $10,000 and intangible assets of $1,264,000. Total transaction costs of $261,000 for our acquisition activities in 2012 were expensed as incurred.

In connection with these acquisitions, we recorded liabilities of $27.5 million representing the fair value of contingent consideration to be paid based upon the estimated achievement of certain operating results of the acquired practices as of certain measurement dates. The fair value of such contingent consideration is re-evaluated on a quarterly basis based on changes in our estimate of the future operating results of the acquired practices. The changes, if any, in fair value are recognized in our results of operations.

We manage our business by monitoring certain key performance indicators that impact our revenue and profitability. The most important key performance indicators for our business are:

During 2012, 2011 and 2010 approximately 60%, 62% and 64%, respectively, of our net revenue was generated by operations in five states: Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Missouri and Texas. Over those same periods, our operations in Florida and Texas accounted for approximately, 33%, 32% and 36% of our net revenue, respectively. Although we continue to seek to diversify the geographic scope of our operations, primarily through acquisitions of physician group practices or by recruiting new hospitalists or entering into new hospital contracts, we may not be able to successfully implement or realize the expected benefits of any of these initiatives. Adverse changes or conditions affecting states in which our operations are concentrated, such as healthcare reforms, changes in laws and regulations, reduced Medicaid reimbursements, or government investigations, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We generate approximately 94% of our net revenue from billings to third-party payors such as Medicare, Medicaid, managed care organizations and insurance companies. We generate the remaining 6% of our net revenue from hospitals and other inpatient facilities for organizing and managing hospitalist programs, providing medical directorships and providing coverage for patients admitted from the emergency department who otherwise have no assigned admitting physician.

Our affiliated hospitalists generally document and submit billing codes daily through the use of IPC-Link^®. IPC-Link^® captures all our patient demographic and clinical information for billing and submits this data electronically after a series of automated edits and manual review of any exceptions. Our automated edit procedures follow specific business rules to correct billing errors. We utilize a sophisticated tracking and monitoring system to obtain receipt of appropriate reimbursement from our payors and identify billing issues and trends early in the reimbursement process. Our monitoring system is able to identify when we are reimbursed less than what we are contracted to receive and report when we have not received appropriate payment or other issues have developed. Based on the information from our monitoring system, our collection department contacts third party payors to resolve billing issues and to expedite our collections. If we have a contractual relationship with the payor, we pursue the collection until the issue is resolved. If we are unable to collect from third-party payors and we do not have a contractual relationship with the payor, we bill the patient for the unpaid balance. We use outside service organizations to invoice and collect co-payments and/or deductibles from insured patients and discounted fees from uninsured, or self-pay, patients. After a period of internal collection efforts, we write off the unpaid accounts and send them to an outside collection agency.

We determine our net revenue from patient billings based on our estimate of collections from payors. Our fee schedule is the same for all parties regardless of geography or party responsible for paying the bill for our services. We are reimbursed by Medicare and Medicaid at government established rates, by managed care and insurance organizations at contracted rates or other discounted rates and have various arrangements with other third-party insurers. In addition, patients may be personally responsible for a deductible or co-payment under their third-party payor coverage. We may provide discounted or free services to self-pay patients who require hospital admission when we are providing admission coverage for emergency departments, if our collection attempts are unsuccessful. Due to the uncertainty regarding collectability of charges associated with services we provide to uninsured patients and patients with co-pay or deductible balances, our net revenue recognition for these patients is based on our expected cash collections.

With respect to our revenue generated from billings to third-party payors, the table below summarizes our approximate payor mix as a percentage of patient encounters for the periods indicated:

The percentage of our net revenue related to self-pay patients is significantly smaller percentage of our net revenues compared to other payors, as higher percentage of these services are uncompensated.

We have historically experienced and expect to continue to experience quarterly fluctuations in net revenue and income from operations. Absent the impact and timing of acquisitions, our net revenue has historically been higher in the first and fourth quarters of the year primarily due to the following factors:

We have significant fixed operating costs, including physician practice salaries and benefits and, as a result, are highly dependent on patient encounters and the productivity of our hospitalists to sustain profitability. Additionally, quarterly results may be affected by the timing of acquisitions.

The Medicare program reimburses for our services based upon the rates set forth in the annually updated Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, which relies, in part, on a target-setting formula system called the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR). Many private payors use the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule to determine their own reimbursement rates. Based on the SGR, the annual Medicare Physician Fee Schedule update is adjusted to reflect the comparison of actual expenditures to target expenditures. Because one of the factors for calculating the SGR is linked to the growth in the U.S. GDP, the SGR formula may result in a negative payment update if growth in Medicare beneficiaries’ use of services exceeds GDP growth, a situation which has occurred every year since 2002 and the reoccurrence of which we cannot predict.

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 delayed implementation of the negative SGR payment update again until January 1, 2013, when the cut would have been 26.5 percent. Similarly, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, enacted on January 2, 2013, delays the implementation of the negative SGR payment update until January 1, 2014. While Congress has repeatedly intervened to mitigate the negative reimbursement impact associated with the SGR formula, there is no guarantee that Congress will continue to do so in the future. Moreover, the existing methodology may result in significant yearly fluctuations in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule amounts, which may be unrelated to changes in the actual costs of providing physician services. Unless Congress enacts a change in the SGR methodology, the uncertainty regarding reimbursement rates and fluctuation will continue to exist.

Another provision that affects physician payments is an adjustment under the Medicare statute to reflect the geographic variation in the cost of delivering physician services, by comparing those costs to the national average. This concerns the “work” component of the Geographic Practice Cost Indices (GPCI). If Congress does not block this adjustment, payments would be decreased to any geographic area with an index of less than 1.0. The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 prevented the GPCI payment adjustment through the end of 2012. With enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 on January 2, 2013, again, the GPCI payment adjustment has been delayed through the end of 2013. Although Congress has delayed the GPCI payment adjustment several times, there is no guarantee that Congress will block the adjustment in the future, which could result in a decrease in payments we receive for physician services.

Congress has a strong interest in reducing the federal debt, which may lead to new proposals designed to achieve savings by altering payment policies. The Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA) established a Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, which was tasked with achieving a reduction in the federal debt level of at least $1.2 trillion. That Committee did not draft a proposal by the BCA’s deadline. As a result, automatic cuts in various federal programs were scheduled to take place, beginning in January 2013. Although the Medicare program’s eligibility and scope of benefits are generally exempt from these cuts, Medicare payments to providers are not exempt. The BCA did, however, provide that the Medicare cuts to providers would not exceed two percent. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, signed into law on January 2, 2013, delayed implementation of the BCA’s automatic cuts until March 1, 2013. Thus, Congress and the White House will be forced to confront this matter again.

In fact, the situation with the federal budget remains in flux. First, if an agreement is not reached and legislation is not enacted by March 1, 2013, the BCA’s automatic cuts will go into effect, including the two percent cut in payments to providers and Part D health plans. Second, the appropriations law that is funding operations of the federal government will expire on March 27, 2013, and there may be a partial government shutdown if a new appropriations law is not enacted. Third, the statutory debt ceiling was reached on December 31, 2012. The Treasury Department was using what it calls “extraordinary measures” to avoid defaults by the federal government on its financial obligations, but the Department expected those measures to be exhausted at some point during the period mid-February to early March. Many Members of Congress have made public statements indicating that some or all of these budget-related deadlines should be used as leverage to negotiate additional cuts in federal spending. The Medicare program is frequently mentioned as a target for spending cuts.

The magnitude of Medicare cuts that may be made through budget agreements is unclear. However, under our provider compensation plan, any decrease in reimbursement rates would reduce our physician incentive payments. For example, the BCA’s automatic two percent net reduction in Medicare reimbursement rates for the codes applicable to the services performed by our affiliated hospitalists could reduce our net income by approximately 0.2 percent.

In March 2010, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was enacted. The ACA includes a number of provisions that may affect our Company, although the impact of many of the changes will be unknown until they are implemented, which in some cases will not occur for a couple of years. The impact of some of these provisions may be positive, such as the expansion in the number of individuals with health insurance, the ten percent Medicare bonus payment for primary care services (including outpatient and nursing home visits) from 2011 through 2015 to primary care practitioners for whom primary care services represented a minimum of 60 percent of Medicare allowed charges in a prior period, and the increase in Medicaid rates in 2013 and 2014 for primary care services. The impact of other provisions is unknown at this time, such as the establishment of an Independent Payment Advisory Board that could recommend changes in payment for physicians under certain circumstances not earlier than January 15, 2014, which the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) generally would be required to implement unless Congress enacts superseding legislation. Fraud and abuse penalty increases and the expansion in the scope of the reach of the federal False Claims Act and government enforcement tools may adversely impact entities in the healthcare industry, including our Company.

The impact of certain provisions will depend upon the ultimate method of implementation. For example, the ACA requires HHS to develop a budget neutral value-based payment modifier that provides for differential payment under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for physicians or groups of physicians that is linked to quality of care furnished compared to cost. HHS has begun implementing the modifier through the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule rulemaking for 2013, by, among other things, specifying the initial performance period and how it will apply the upward and downward modifier for certain physicians and physician groups beginning January 1, 2015, as well as all physicians and physician groups starting not later than January 1, 2017. During this rulemaking process, HHS considered whether it should develop a value-based payment modifier option for hospital-based physicians, but ultimately, HHS decided to deal with this issue in future rulemaking. The impact of this payment modifier cannot be determined at this time.

In addition, certain provisions of the ACA authorize voluntary demonstration projects, which include the development of bundling payments for acute, inpatient hospital services, physician services, and post-acute services for episodes of hospital care. The Medicare Acute Care Episode Demonstration is currently underway at five health care system demonstration sites. The impact of these projects on our Company cannot be determined at this time.

Medical malpractice insurance premium rates are affected by a variety of factors both internal, including our own loss experience and the associated defense costs, and external such as medical malpractice loss experience for internal medicine physicians, which varies greatly across different regions. Other factors include varying state laws covering tort reform, the local climate for large jury awards, the rate of investment income and reinsurance costs, all of which can result in wide variations in premium rates not only from region to region, but also from year to year. Although our malpractice premium rates have remained relatively stable over the last three years, the factors discussed above could lead to variations in future costs.

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries and consolidated professional medical corporations managed under long-term management agreements (the Professional Medical Corporations). Some states have laws that prohibit business entities, such as IPC, from practicing medicine, employing physicians to practice medicine, exercising control over medical decisions by physicians (collectively known as the corporate practice of medicine), or engaging in certain arrangements with physicians, such as fee-splitting. In states that have these restrictions, we operate by maintaining long-term management contracts with the Professional Medical Corporations, which are each owned and operated by physicians, and which employ or contract with additional physicians to provide hospitalist services. Under the management agreements, we provide and perform all non-medical management and administrative services, including financial management, information systems, marketing, risk management and administrative support. The management agreements have an initial term of 20 years and are automatically renewable for successive 10-year periods unless terminated by either party for cause. The management agreements are not terminable by the Professional Medical Corporations, except in the case of gross negligence, fraud, or other illegal acts by us, or bankruptcy of IPC.

Through the management agreements and our relationship with the stockholders of the Professional Medical Corporations, we have exclusive authority over all non-medical decision making related to the ongoing business operations of the Professional Medical Corporations. Further, our rights under the management agreements are unilaterally salable or transferable. Based on the provisions of the agreements, we have determined that the Professional Medical Corporations are variable interest entities (VIE’s), and that we are the primary beneficiary because we have controls over the operations of these VIE’s. Consequently, we consolidate the revenue and expenses of the Professional Medical Corporations from the date of execution of the agreements. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations, financial condition and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following are our most critical accounting estimates, which are those that require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, requiring the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.

The following discussion is not intended to represent a comprehensive list of our accounting estimates. For a detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Report.

Net revenue primarily consists of fees for medical services provided by our affiliated hospitalists under fee-for-service and other professional fee arrangements with various payors including Medicare, Medicaid, managed care organizations, insurance companies and hospitals.

Net revenue is reported in the period in which services are provided at amounts expected to be collected, which excludes contractual discounts and an estimate of uncollectible accounts. The process of estimating the ultimate amount of revenue to be collected is highly subjective and requires the application of our judgment based on many factors, including contractual reimbursement rates, payor mix, age of receivables, historical cash collection experience and other relevant information. We write off uncollectible accounts receivable from our billing system after reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted. Revenue related to patient responsibility accounts, including both deductible and co-pays for insured patients and discounted fees for uninsured patients, is recorded at amounts reasonably assured of collection.

The evaluation of these factors, as well as the interpretation of governmental regulations and private insurance contract provisions, involves complex, subjective judgments. As a result of the inherent complexity of these calculations, our actual revenues and net income could vary from the amounts reported.

Accounts receivable primarily consists of amounts due from third-party payors, including governmental programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, managed care organizations, insurance companies, hospitals and amounts due from patients. Accounts receivable are recorded and stated at the amount expected to be collected, net of reserves for amounts estimated by management to be uncollectible. We write off uncollectible accounts receivable from our billing system after reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted. We also regularly analyze the ultimate collectability of accounts receivable after certain stages of the collection cycle using a look-back analysis to determine the amount of receivables subsequently collected and adjustments are recorded when necessary.

We record acquired assets and liabilities and any contingent consideration at their acquisition-date fair values, and expense all transaction related costs under the acquisition method of accounting. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets primarily represent the fair value of hospital service contract agreements and non-compete agreements acquired in connection with certain asset purchase agreements. Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized. Separable identified intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives.

In addition to the initial consideration paid at the close of each business combination, the asset purchase agreements for most completed practice acquisitions provide for additional future consideration to be paid, which is generally based upon the achievement of certain operating results of the acquired practices as of certain measurement dates. Pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the estimated fair value of contingent consideration is accrued at the acquisition-date. Subsequent changes, if any, to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration are recognized as part of on-going operations.

We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, as well as when events or changes in business conditions indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable , at the entity level since we have only one reporting unit pursuant to GAAP. The testing for impairment is completed using a two step test. The first step compares the fair value of our Company with its carrying amount. The fair value of our Company is derived using the market-multiple valuation approach, which is based on our peer group’s market capitalization computed using publicly available market quotes. If the fair value of our Company is less than its carrying amount, a second step is performed to determine the amount of any impairment loss. We review our finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

During 2012, 2011 and 2010, no impairment indicators were present and no impairment was recognized.

We maintain a medical malpractice liability insurance policy, which expires on December 31 of each year indemnifying us and our employed health care professionals on a claims-made basis. Our claims-made policy covers only those claims reported during the policy period. Our current claims-made professional liability insurance policy provides first dollar coverage up to our policy limits. Consequently, we establish reserves for our liabilities, on an undiscounted basis, for claims incurred and reported and claims incurred but not reported during the policy period. For claims incurred and reported, an insurance receivable from our carrier has been recorded pursuant to GAAP. See our discussion in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of our accrued medical malpractice reserves and related insurance receivables. These reserves are based upon actuarial loss projections, which are updated semi-annually. The actuarial loss projections consider a number of factors, including historical claim payment patterns and changes in case reserves and the assumed rate of increase in healthcare costs. Historical experience and recent trends in the historical experience are the most significant factors in the determination of these reserves. We believe the use of actuarial methods to account for these reserves provides a consistent and effective way to measure these subjective accruals. However, given the magnitude of the claims involved and the length of time until the ultimate cost is known, the use of any estimation technique in this area is inherently sensitive and subject to change when actual paid claims information becomes known. Accordingly, our recorded reserves could differ from our ultimate costs related to these claims due to changes in our incident reporting, claims payment and settlement practices or claims reserve practices, as well as differences between assumed and actual future cost increases.

See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding recently adopted accounting principles.

The following table sets forth operating data and selected consolidated statements of income information stated as a percentage of net revenue:

Our patient encounters for 2012 increased by 734,000 or 15.4% to 5,496,000, compared to 4,762,000 for 2011. Net revenue for 2012 was $523.5 million, an increase of $66.0 million, or 14.4%, from $457.5 million for 2011. Of this $66.0 million increase, 63% was attributable to same-market area growth and 37% was attributable to revenue generated from new markets. Same-market revenue increased 9.3%, same market encounters increased 11.3% and same-market patient revenue per encounter decreased 2.4%. The 2.4% decrease was due to a shift in service mix from acute to post acute care. Same-market areas are those geographic areas in which we have had operations for the entire current period and the entire comparable prior period. Because in-market area acquisitions are often small practice groups which become subsumed within existing practice groups and are managed by our existing regional management staff, we consider these as part of our same-market area growth.

Physician practice salaries, benefits and other expenses for 2012 were $382.9 million or 73.2% of net revenue compared to $335.0 million or 73.2% of net revenue for 2011. These costs increased by $48.0 million or 14.3%. The increase in practice costs is largely related to the increase in the number of hospitalists added through hiring and acquisitions during the period. Same-market area physician costs increased a total of $30.9 million, which was primarily the result of increased costs related to our new hires or acquired physician practices. In addition, $17.1 million of the $48.0 million overall cost increase is attributable to physician costs associated with our seven new markets.

General and administrative expenses increased $10.4 million, or 14.2%, to $83.7 million, or 16.0% of net revenue, for 2012, as compared to $73.3 million, or 16.0% of net revenue for 2011. The increase in expense was primarily the result of increased costs to support the continuing growth of our operations, including new regional office costs and other expenses and the significant increase in acquisitions. Excluding stock-based compensation, general and administrative expenses decreased by 20 basis points to 14.8% of revenue, compared to 15.0% of revenue for 2011.

Net change in fair value of contingent consideration increased by $0.3 million in 2012, as compared to a decrease of $1.0 million in 2011. Because the fair value of contingent consideration is generally based on a certain multiple of operating results of the acquired practices during a measurement period, changes to our estimate of projected operating results of the acquired practices impact the fair value of the related contingent consideration, resulting in gains or losses that are included in our consolidated results of operations.

Income from operations increased $5.6 million, or 11.9%, to $52.6 million, as compared to $47.0 million for 2011. Our operating margin was 10.1% for 2012 as compared to 10.3% for 2011. Excluding the net change in fair value of contingent consideration, income from operations for 2012 increased 15.1% to $53.0 million, or an operating margin of 10.1%, compared to income from operations of $46.0 million, or an operating margin of 10.1% for 2011.

Our effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was 37.7% and 37.5%, respectively. The increase in the overall effective tax rate was primarily related to a change in state tax laws. We expect our 2013 effective income tax rate to be approximately 38.3%. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory U.S. federal rate of 35.0% due primarily to state income taxes.

Net income increased to $32.6 million for 2012, as compared to $29.3 million for 2011, and our net income margin was 6.2% for 2012 as compared to 6.4% for the same period in the prior year. Diluted earnings per share for 2012 was $1.92, as compared to diluted earnings per share of $1.74 in 2011. Excluding the net change in the fair value of contingent considerations, net income for 2012 increased 14.5% to $32.8 million, or $1.93 diluted earnings per share, compared to net income of $28.6 million, or $1.70 diluted earnings per share for 2011.

Our patient encounters for 2011 increased by 952,000 or 25.0% to 4,762,000, compared to 3,810,000 for 2010. Net revenue for 2011 was $457.5 million, an increase of $94.1 million, or 25.9%, from $363.4 million for 2010. Of this $94.1 million increase, 68.9% was attributable to same-market area growth and 31.1% was attributable to revenue generated from new markets. Same-market revenue increased 17.9%, which is primarily the result of an increase of same-market encounters by 17.5% and an increase of patient revenue per encounter by 0.1%.

Physician practice salaries, benefits and other expenses for 2011 were $335.0 million or 73.2% of net revenue compared to $261.5 million or 72.0% of net revenue for 2010. These costs increased by $73.5 million or 28.1%. The increase in practice costs is largely related to the increase in the number of hospitalists added through hiring and acquisitions during the period and to continued investment in physician leadership initiatives. Same-market area physician costs increased a total of $51.9 million, of which $52.7 million was primarily the result of increased costs related to our new hires or acquired physician practices, offset by a net decrease of $0.8 million in existing physician costs. In addition, $21.6 million of the $73.5 million overall cost increase is attributable to physician costs associated with our eight new markets.

As a percentage of revenue, physician costs increased by 120 basis points year over year. During 2011, we had a net increase of 169 providers, 147 of which came on board during the second half of the year. This large increase in the number of providers resulted in lower productivity during this ramp up period. In addition, several of our larger contracted practices experienced staffing challenges resulting in added costs for locum tenens, moonlighters and premium call pay and discretionary bonuses for employed physicians.

General and administrative expenses increased $13.6 million, or 22.8%, to $73.3 million, or 16.0% of net revenue, for 2011, as compared to $59.7 million, or 16.4% of net revenue for 2010. The increase in expense is primarily the result of increased costs to support the continuing growth of IPC’s operations, including new regional office costs and increases in corporate development and other expenses to support acquisitions. General and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of net revenue as IPC continues to leverage these costs over a larger revenue base. Excluding stock-based compensation, general and administrative expenses decreased by 50 basis points to 15.0% of revenue, compared to 15.5% of revenue for 2010.

Net change in fair value of contingent consideration decreased by $1.0 million in 2011, as compared to an increase of $0.2 million in 2010.

Income from operations increased $7.7 million, or 19.6%, to $47.0 million, as compared to $39.3 million for 2010. Our operating margin was 10.3% for 2011 as compared to 10.8% for 2010. Excluding the net change in fair value of contingent consideration, income from operations for 2011 increased 16.5% to $46.0 million, or an operating margin of 10.1%, compared to income from operations of $39.5 million, or an operating margin of 10.9% for 2010. The decrease in the operating margin was largely the result of the increase in physician costs as a percentage of revenue, partially offset by the decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue.

Our effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was 37.5% and 38.2%, respectively. The decrease in the overall effective tax rate was primarily due to a change in the state tax laws and increased state credits during 2011.

Net income increased to $29.3 million for 2011, as compared to $24.3 million for 2010, and our net income margin was 6.4% for 2011 as compared to 6.7% for the same period in the prior year. Diluted earnings per share for 2011 was $1.74, as compared to diluted earnings per share of $1.46 in 2010. Excluding the net change in the fair value of contingent considerations, net income for 2011 increased 17.5% to $28.6 million, or $1.70 diluted earnings per share, compared to net income of $24.4 million, or $1.47 diluted earnings per share for 2010.

As of December 31, 2012 we had approximately $71.0 million in liquidity, comprised of $16.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and an available line of credit of $54.8 million. We had borrowings of $20 million from our revolving line of credit outstanding at December 31, 2012.

Net cash provided by operating activities for 2012 was $39.8 million compared to $25.8 million for 2011. The primary changes in working capital during the year ended December 31, 2012 consisted of (i) an increase in accounts receivable of $11.6 million which is in proportion to the increase in our 2012 revenue, (ii) a net increase in medical malpractice and self-insurance reserves of $3.2 million, (iii) an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $4.1 million, and (iv) an increase in accrued compensation of $7.0 million primarily related to timing of payrolls and physician bonus payments.

Our days sales outstanding (DSO), which we use to measure the effectiveness of our collections, was 52 and 51 DSO as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We calculate our DSO using a three-month rolling average of net revenues.

Net cash used in investing activities was $66.2 million for 2012, compared to $31.1 million for 2011. Cash of $62.6 million was used in 2012 for physician practice acquisitions and earn-out payments on prior acquisitions compared to $27.8 million used in 2011. The remainder of cash used in investing activities was for purchases of computer hardware and software, and office furnishings.

For 2012, net cash provided by financing activities was $24.8 million, compared to $4.2 million provided by financing activities for 2011. In March 2012, we borrowed $15.0 million from our revolving line of credit, which was repaid in the second quarter of 2012. In December 2012, we borrowed $20.0 million from our revolving line of credit to fund new acquisitions and pay for contingent considerations of acquired practices.

Net cash provided by operating activities for 2011 was $25.8 million compared to $29.6 million for 2010. The primary changes in working capital during the year ended December 31, 2011 consisted of (i) an increase in accounts receivable of $13.8 million which is in proportion to the increase in our 2011 revenue, (ii) a net increase in medical malpractice and self-insurance reserves of $3.7 million, (iii) an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $3.5 million, and (iv) an increase in accrued compensation of $2.2 million primarily related to timing of payrolls and physician bonus payments.

Our days sales outstanding (DSO), which we use to measure the effectiveness of our collections, was 51 DSO as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Net cash used in investing activities was $31.1 million for 2011, compared to $43.9 million for 2010. Cash of $27.8 million was used in 2011 for physician practice acquisitions and earn-out payments on prior acquisitions compared to $41.2 million used in 2010. The remainder of cash used in investing activities was for purchases of computer hardware and software, and office furnishings.

For 2011, net cash provided by financing activities was $4.2 million, compared to $1.7 million provided by financing activities for 2010.

Our secured revolving credit agreement (Credit Facility) provides a revolving line of credit of $75.0 million and contains an “accordion” feature that allows an increase of $25.0 million to the Credit Facility with lender approval. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of August 4, 2016 and is available for working capital, practice acquisitions, capital expenditures and general business expenses. During March 2012, we borrowed $15.0 million under the Credit Facility bearing interest at 1.0% per annum, which was repaid during the second quarter 2012. In December 2012, we borrowed $20.0 million under the Credit Facility bearing interest at 1.0%. As of December 31, 2012, we had borrowings of $20.0 million and letters of credit of $0.2 million outstanding, and $54.8 million available under the Credit Facility.

The revolving line of credit is limited by a formula based on a certain multiple times the trailing twelve months of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain non-cash items. Interest rate options for each borrowing under the Credit Facility, to be selected by us at the time of each borrowing, include either LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.25%, or the lender’s prime rate plus 0% to 0.25%, both based on a leverage ratio. We pay an unused commitment fee equal to 0.25% per annum on the difference between the revolving line capacity and the average balance outstanding during the year. Outstanding amounts advanced to us under the revolving line of credit are repayable on or before the maturity date.

The Credit Facility is guaranteed by our subsidiaries and affiliated Professional Medical Corporations and limited liability companies, and is secured by substantially all of our and our guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets. The Credit Facility includes various customary financial covenants and restrictions, as well as customary remedies for our lenders following an event of default. As of December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with such financial covenants and restrictions.

We anticipate that funds generated from operations, together with our current cash on hand and funds available under our revolving credit agreement will be sufficient to finance our working capital requirements and fund anticipated acquisitions, contingent acquisition consideration and capital expenditures.

The table below summarizes by maturity our significant contractual obligations and reserves, including interest, as of December 31, 2012:

We are exposed to changes in interest rate as a result of our Credit Facility. At our option, the interest rate on outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility is either LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.25% or the lender’s prime rate plus 0% to 0.25%, both based on a leverage ratio. The lender’s prime rate is a daily floating rate most recently announced by our lender, whether or not such announced rate is the lowest rate available from our lender. LIBOR is either the 30, 60, 90 or 180 day LIBOR. Historically, we have chosen not to use interest rate derivatives to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates.

Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities with shorter maturities may produce less income if interest rates fall. As of December 31, 2012, all of our short-term investments were invested in money market funds with less than 90-day maturities.

The consolidated financial statements and supplementary data are as set forth in the “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page 45.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company,” “IPC,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) is a national physician group practice company that operates and manages full-time hospitalist practices. Hospitalists focus on a patient’s care from the time of admission to discharge, working in close consultation with primary care physicians, other referring physicians and medical providers to coordinate the inpatient care delivery system and manage the entire inpatient episode of care. Our affiliated hospitalists practice in inpatient facilities, including acute care hospitals, long-term acute care facilities, specialty hospitals, psychiatric facilities and post-acute care facilities. The physicians are primarily full-time employees of our subsidiaries or consolidated Professional Medical Corporations, although part-time and temporary physicians are also employed or contracted on an as-needed basis. Also, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, “our affiliated hospitalists” refer to physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants employed or contracted by either our wholly-owned subsidiaries or our Professional Medical Corporations. References to “practices” or “practice groups” refer to our Professional Medical Corporations and the wholly-owned subsidiaries of IPC that provide medical services, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries and consolidated professional medical corporations managed under long-term management agreements. Some states have laws that prohibit business entities, such as IPC, from practicing medicine, employing physicians to practice medicine, exercising control over medical decisions by physicians (collectively known as the corporate practice of medicine), or engaging in certain arrangements with physicians, such as fee-splitting. In states that have these restrictions, we operate by maintaining long-term management contracts with affiliated professional organizations, which are each owned and operated by physicians, and which employ or contract with additional physicians to provide hospitalist services. Under the management agreements, we provide and perform all non-medical management and administrative services, including financial management, information systems, marketing, risk management and administrative support. The management agreements have an initial term of 20 years and are automatically renewable for successive 10-year periods unless terminated by either party for cause. The management agreements are not terminable by the Professional Medical Corporations, except in the case of gross negligence, fraud, or other illegal acts by us, or bankruptcy of IPC.

In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the results of our operations are consolidated into a single reportable segment for purposes of presenting financial information.

Net revenue consists of fees for medical services provided by our affiliated hospitalists under fee-for-service, case rate and other professional fee arrangements with various payors including Medicare, Medicaid, managed care organizations, insurance companies, and hospitals. For the years ended December 31, total patient volume consisted of the following percentage from Medicare and Medicaid programs:

Net revenue is reported in the period in which services are provided at amounts expected to be collected, which excludes contractual discounts and an estimate of uncollectible accounts. The process of estimating the ultimate amount of revenue to be collected is highly subjective and requires the application of our judgment based on many factors, including contractual reimbursement rates, payor mix, age of receivables, historical cash collection experience and other relevant information. We write off uncollectible accounts receivable from our billing system after reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted. The following amounts, which are excluded from our net revenues, represent an estimate of uncollectible patient copayments and deductible accounts related to patient services during the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions of the fair value of certain reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses at the date and for the periods that the financial statements are prepared. Significant estimates include the estimated net realizable value of accounts receivable, medical malpractice insurance receivable and payable for known claims, liabilities for claims incurred but not reported (IBNR) related to medical malpractice, fair value of contingent consideration related to business combinations and the analysis of goodwill for impairment.

The process of estimating these assets and liabilities involves judgment decisions, which are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 included the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, payable for practice acquisitions and long-term debt. We consider the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued liabilities to approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization. The carrying amount of our long-term debt borrowed from our line of credit in December 2012 approximated its fair value at December 31, 2012. Pursuant to GAAP, we determine the fair value of our long-term borrowing using inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data, which is defined as Level 2 input under GAAP on fair value measures.

Our payable for practice acquisitions consisted of accrued contingent consideration for practice acquisitions, which is carried at fair value determined using the income approach with unobservable inputs defined as Level 3 inputs under GAAP. The remaining amount of our payable for practice acquisitions is recorded at its carrying value, which approximates its fair value due to the relatively short period of time between its origination and its expected realization. See Note 10 for more information.

Our cash and cash equivalents consist of bank deposits, money market accounts and short-term securities with maturities of three months or less.

Accounts receivable primarily consists of amounts due from third-party payors, including government sponsored Medicare and Medicaid programs, and insurance companies, and amounts due from hospitals, and patients. Accounts receivable are recorded and stated at the amount expected to be collected. The following amounts which are excluded from our accounts receivable, represent an estimate of uncollectible accounts at December 31 (in thousands):

Except with respect to the Medicare and Medicaid programs, concentrations of credit risk, which consist primarily of accounts receivable, is limited due to the large number of payors comprising our diverse payor mix and patient base. As of December 31, accounts receivable from Medicare and Medicaid made up the following percentage of total net accounts receivable:

Property and equipment are stated on the basis of cost or fair value on the date of practice acquisition. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The depreciable life is generally three years for equipment and software, seven years for furniture, and the lesser of the useful life or lease period for leasehold improvements. At December 31, property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):

For the years ended December 31, the following amounts were included in total depreciation and amortization expense (in thousands):

In addition to the initial consideration paid at the close of each business combination, the asset purchase agreements for certain completed practice acquisitions provide for additional future consideration to be paid, which is generally based upon the achievement of certain operating results of the acquired practices as of certain measurement dates. Pursuant to GAAP, the estimated fair value of contingent consideration is accrued at the acquisition-date. Subsequent changes, if any, to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration are recognized as part of on-going operations.

We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, as well as when events or changes in business conditions indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable, at the entity level since we have only one reporting unit pursuant to GAAP. The testing for impairment is completed using a two-step test. The first step compares the fair value of our Company with its carrying amount. The fair value of our Company is derived using the market-multiple valuation approach, which is based on our peer group’s market capitalization computed using publicly available market quotes. The fair value from the market-multiple approach is used to derive the fair value of our Company. If the fair value of our Company is less than its carrying amount, a second step is performed to determine the amount of any impairment loss. We review our finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, no impairment indicators were present and no impairment was recognized.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

At December 31, other intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

For the years ended December 31, the following amortization of other intangible assets was included in total depreciation and amortization expenses (in thousands):

Other intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives which range from three to six years and have a weighted average remaining useful life of 1.8 years at December 31, 2012. Future estimated aggregate amortization expenses are as follows (in thousands):

We maintain medical malpractice insurance coverage that indemnifies us and our employed health care professionals on a claims-made basis. Our claims-made coverage covers those claims reported during the policy period, which ends December 31 of each year, on a first dollar coverage up to our policy limits on new claims reported during the policy period. In December 2012, we renewed our annual professional liability insurance policy for 2013 effective January 1, 2013 under the same terms as our 2012 policy. We expect to be able to continue to obtain coverage in future years; however, there can be no assurance that we will obtain substantially similar coverage as is provided under the 2013 policy at acceptable costs and on favorable terms upon expiration.

We record our medical malpractice reserves, on an undiscounted basis, for claims incurred and reported and claims incurred but not reported during the policy period, based on actuarial loss projections using historical loss patterns. For claims incurred and reported, an insurance receivable from our carrier has been recorded pursuant to GAAP.

Total accrued medical malpractice reserves and related insurance receivables at December 31 were as follows (in thousands):

As of December 31, 2012, we had a stock-based employee compensation program, which is described more fully in Note 6. Compensation cost recognized in 2012, 2011 and 2010 includes amounts for awards granted after December 31, 2005 and for awards outstanding on December 31, 2005 that are subsequently modified, based on the estimated grant-date fair value.

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued a GAAP update on goodwill to allow an entity the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit when testing goodwill for impairment. If the qualitative assessment concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the entity shall perform the quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test. Otherwise, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. We adopted this revised GAAP effective on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this revised GAAP does not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2011, the FASB issued a GAAP update on revenue recognition for certain health care entities that recognize significant amounts of patient service revenue without assessing the patient’s ability to pay. This revised GAAP requires such health care entities to present the provision for bad debt related to patient service revenue as a deduction from patient service revenue (net of contractual allowance and discounts) on their statement of income. It also requires additional disclosures of patient service revenue as well as qualitative and quantitative information about changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts. We adopted this revised GAAP effective on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this revised GAAP does not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows as we do not recognize a significant amount of revenue at the time services are rendered without assessing the patient’s ability to pay.

In May 2011, the FASB issued a GAAP update on fair value measurement, which eliminates certain differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), resulting in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS. It also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. We adopted this revised GAAP effective on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this revised GAAP does not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

We recognize all of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any contingent consideration at the acquisition-date fair value and expense all transaction related costs.

During 2012, in connection with the acquisition of assets of 15 hospitalist physician practices, we recorded goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets consisting of physician and hospital agreements. Amounts recorded as goodwill and identifiable intangible assets are amortized for tax purposes over 15 years. The results of operations of these acquisitions are included in the consolidated financial statements from the respective dates of acquisition. In addition to the initial consideration paid at the close of each transaction, the asset purchase agreements for most of the completed acquisitions in 2012 provide for contingent consideration to be paid, which is generally based upon the achievement of certain operating results of the acquired practices as of certain measurement dates. These additional payments are not contingent upon the future employment of the sellers. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration related to transactions is recognized at the acquisition-date. Subsequent changes, if any, to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration are recognized as part of on-going operations. In 2012, the net increase in the fair value of contingent consideration was $324,000.

We estimate the fair value of contingent consideration to be paid based on discounted projected earnings of the acquired practices as of certain measurement dates. The discount rate that we use consists of a risk-free U.S. Treasury bond yield plus a company specific credit spread which we believe is acceptable by willing market participants.

The following table summarizes the total amounts recorded during 2012 and 2011, related to the acquisition of hospitalist practices (in thousands):

Our secured revolving credit agreement (Credit Facility) provides a revolving line of credit of $75.0 million and contains an “accordion” feature that allows an increase of $25.0 million to the Credit Facility with lender approval. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of August 4, 2016 and is available for working capital, practice acquisitions, capital expenditures and general business expenses. In March 2012, we borrowed $15.0 million under the Credit Facility bearing interest at 1.0% per annum, which was repaid during the second quarter 2012. In December 2012, we borrowed $20.0 million under the Credit Facility bearing interest at 1.0%. As of December 31, 2012, we had borrowings of $20.0 million and letters of credit of $0.2 million outstanding, and $54.8 million available under the Credit Facility.

Interest costs and unused commitment fees related to our debt and Credit Facility for the years ended December 31 are comprised of the following (in thousands):

The following table represents the current and deferred income tax provision for federal and state income taxes attributable to operations (in thousands):

A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes compared with U.S. statutory tax rates for the years ended December 31 is shown below:

In 2012, there was an increase in the overall effective tax rate due to a change in the state effective tax rate primarily related to recording a partial valuation allowance attributable to certain state credit carryforwards. In 2011, there was a decrease in the overall effective tax rate due to a change in the state effective tax rate primarily related to the adoption of single sales factor apportionment for California.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. At December 31, the significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

We evaluate the recoverability of our deferred tax assets based on operations. The Company evaluated the positive and negative evidence related to their ability to utilize certain state credit carry forwards and concluded it is not more likely than not the credits will be fully utilized. California passed a tax law change in November, 2012 that reduced the Company’s annual credit utilization. Given this law change and considering all other available information, a partial valuation allowance of $930,000 was determined to be necessary. In addition, there is a valuation allowance related to consolidated Professional Medical Corporations that file separate tax returns for which the realization of the deferred tax asset is not more likely than not to be utilized. There is a net deferred tax liability at December 31, 2012 due to an increase in tax amortization of goodwill which has an indefinite reversal pattern.

As of December 31, 2012 we have federal NOL carryforwards of $1,701,000, which begin to expire in 2019, and state NOL carryforwards of $663,000, which begin to expire in 2020. Federal NOLs of $781,000 incurred before 2000 are subject to an annual change of ownership limitation of approximately $195,000 per Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and applicable state statutes, which may limit our ability to utilize a portion of these losses.

As of December 31, 2012 we have certain state credit carryforwards of $2,229,000, which do not expire.

Following is a tabular reconciliation of the gross UTB activity during 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

Our accounting policy is to include interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2012 we did not have any accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

The tax years 2008 to 2011 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. The statute of limitations for tax years 1999 to 2007 has expired, except that the tax year 1999 is subject to adjustment of net operating losses by the Internal Revenue Service. We are subject to taxation in the United States and various state jurisdictions. Two state examinations have been initiated for our Company. The outcome of such examinations cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we believe that the ultimate resolution will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Substantially all of our employees are eligible to participate in the IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the Plan). According to the Plan, we contribute half of the participant’s contributions when they are no greater than 7% of the participant’s annual compensation. The vesting period of our contribution is one year. After 60 days following an employee’s date of hire, all new-hires are automatically enrolled in the Plan. Employees that are automatically enrolled have 60 days to opt out of the Plan and to receive a refund of any contributions made in that period. We fund contributions as accrued. For the years ended December 31, expense recognized in connection with our contributions was (in thousands):

At December 31, 2012, we had a stock-based employee compensation program, for which we had reserved a total of 4,943,170 common shares for issuance. Pursuant to our 2012 Equity Participation Plan (Equity Plan), which was approved by our stockholders on June 7, 2012, a total of 1,422,130 shares of our common stock are available for issuance under this Equity Plan and no new awards will be issued under any previous equity participation plans. As of December 31, 2012, there were 1,425,744 shares of our common stock available for future grants under our Equity Plan, which included the canceled and forfeited shares issued prior to our 2012 Equity Participation Plan.

All option awards granted during 2012, 2011 and 2010 were issued with exercise prices equal to the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the dates of the grant. The options under the Equity Program generally vest over a four-year period from date of grant, and unrestricted options terminate on the 10th anniversary of the agreement date. Restricted stock awards generally vest over a four-year period from date of the award and performance stock awards generally vest over two to three years from date of the award.

Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the period when the options, restricted stock awards, performance stock awards and our employee stock purchase plan shares vest, which is included in total general and administrative expenses as follows (in thousands):

As of December 31, 2012, total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under our Equity Plan and the weighted-average period of years expected to recognize those costs are as follows (dollars in thousands).

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following weighted-average assumptions:

The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues. The expected volatility is based on historical volatility levels of our public company peer group and the volatility of our stock price since our initial public offering in January 2008. The expected option life of each award granted was calculated using the “simplified method” in accordance with GAAP.

The grant date fair value of each restricted stock award or performance stock award is based on the closing stock price on the grant date of the award as reported by NASDAQ Global Select Market.

The following table summarizes the activity in our Equity Plan during the year ended December 31, 2012.

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2012 was $3,748,000.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock award and performance stock award activities in our Equity Plan during the year ended December 31, 2012.

We have a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan (ESPP), which authorizes the issuance of up to an aggregate of 156,250 shares of our common stock to eligible employees who meet the service requirements. At the end of each annual offering period under the plan, an automatic purchase of our common stock is made on behalf of the plan’s participants. Eligible employees may purchase common stock through payroll deductions in amounts from $500 to $10,000 per year. Employees may reduce or suspend deductions during the year or withdraw from the plan during the year and receive a refund of their deductions. Stock purchases are made at a price equal to 85% of the fair market value (i.e., closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market) of a share of our common stock on the first or last day of the offering period, whichever is lower.

For the years ended December 31, the stock-based compensation expense relating to the ESPP was included in general and administrative expenses as follows (in thousands):

Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of our outstanding stock awards and shares issuable under our employee stock purchase plan using the treasury stock method.

The calculations of basic and diluted net income per share for the years ended December 31 are as follows (dollar in thousands, except for per share data):

Outstanding stock options with an exercise price above market are excluded from our diluted computation as their effect would be anti-dilutive. At December 31, stock options with an exercise price above the average annual market price were as follows:

We lease certain buildings and equipment under operating leases. Certain building leases contain renewal options. Future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2012, are as follows (in thousands):

We do not have contingent rent and sub-lease agreements. Rent expense recorded for years ended December 31 was as follows (in thousands):

Laws and regulations governing the Medicare and Medicaid programs are complex and subject to interpretation. Compliance with such laws and regulations can be subject to future government review and interpretation as well as significant regulatory action including fines, penalties, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. We believe that we are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. We are not aware of any specific investigations involving allegations of potential wrongdoing with the exception of the civil investigative demand (CID) issued in 2010 by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the associated qui tam complaint as discussed under the “Government Inquiry” section below.

We operate in certain states regulated under corporate practice of medicine laws and we believe that we are in compliance with all such laws.

In the ordinary course of our business, we become involved in pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, most of which involve claims of medical malpractice related to medical services provided by our affiliated physicians. We may also become subject to other lawsuits, which could involve significant claims and/or significant defense costs.

We believe, based upon our review of pending actions and proceedings that the outcome of such legal actions and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of such actions and proceedings, however, cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows in a future period.

On June 7, 2010, we received a CID issued by the DOJ, U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois. The CID requested information concerning claims that we have submitted to Medicare and Medicaid. The CID covered the period from January 1, 2003, through June 4, 2010, and requested production of a range of documents relating to our Medicare and Medicaid participation, physician arrangements, operations, billings and compliance programs. We believe we have a strong compliance focus, and that we operate with appropriate billing policies, procedures, provider training, and compliance programs and controls. We have produced responsive documents, will discuss with representatives of the government additional future productions to be made if requested and will continue to cooperate in the government investigation. We have been informed by the DOJ that a qui tam whistleblower complaint related to this investigation naming the Company has been filed under court seal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago). We also have been informed that several state attorneys general are examining our Medicaid claims in coordination with the DOJ. It is not possible to predict whether or when this matter may be resolved or what impact, if any, the outcome of this matter might have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Although we currently maintain liability insurance policies on a claims-made basis, which are intended to cover malpractice liability and certain other claims, the coverage must be renewed annually, and may not continue to be available to us in future years at acceptable costs, and on favorable terms. In addition to the known incidents occurring through December 31, 2012 that have resulted in the assertion of claims, we cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us in the future where the outcomes of such claims are unfavorable.

We believe that the ultimate resolution of all pending claims, including liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, there can be no assurance that future claims will not have a material adverse effect on our business.

Some of our assets and liabilities are measured and recorded at fair value, which is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The established fair value hierarchy distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (Levels 1 and 2) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (Level 3). This hierarchy is used to measure fair value as follows:

The following table presents our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

The following table presents our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

The following table presents a reconciliation for our liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):

Our payable for practice acquisitions totaling $29,038,000 and $23,724,000 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is composed of $28,834,000 and $23,624,000, respectively, of accrued contingent consideration measured at fair value, and $204,000 and $100,000, respectively, of other practice acquisition liabilities recorded at undiscounted carrying value which approximates fair value. The fair value of our accrued contingent consideration is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, which include the income approach for estimating future consideration to be paid based on projected earnings of our acquired practices as of specified measurement dates. The income approach involves the use of a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model based on significant inputs not observable in the market. The significant inputs include a discount rate of 2.6%, and 100% probability of achieving the estimated projected earnings.

Because our accrued contingent consideration is generally based on a certain multiple of earnings of the acquired practices during a specified measurement period, a relatively small change in such projected earnings may result in a material change to the fair value of such contingent consideration liability with a corresponding adjustment to income from operations. We reassess our projected earnings and the related fair value of our accrued contingent consideration for practice acquisitions on a quarterly basis.

Following is a summary of our quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands, except for per share data):

Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we completed the acquisition of the assets of one hospitalist physician practice.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

We maintain controls and procedures designed to ensure that we are able to collect the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to process, summarize and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Security Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Those rules define internal control over financial reporting as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate, because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on their assessment and those criteria, management believes that as of December 31, 2012, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Ernst & Young, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing on the page immediately following, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012.

We have audited IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc.’s (the “Company’s”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 and our report dated February 26, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Information required by this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “2013 Proxy Statement”) and is hereby incorporated by reference.

Information required by this item will be contained in the 2013 Proxy Statement and is hereby incorporated by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this item will be contained in the 2013 Proxy Statement and is hereby incorporated by reference.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this item will be contained in the 2013 Proxy Statement and is hereby incorporated by reference.

The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed on the index to financial statements on page 45.

No other schedules are included because the required information is inapplicable, not required or are presented in the financial statements or the related notes thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the twenty-sixth day of February 2013.


IPC THE HOSPITALIST COMPANY, INC. (Registrant)

By:		/S/ ADAM D. SINGER, M.D.
Adam D. Singer, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 26, 2013.


Delaware		95-4562058
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 617 North Hollywood, California		91602
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)


Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		NASDAQ Global Select Market


PART I

Item 1	Business	1
Item 1A	Risk Factors	19
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	29
Item 2	Properties	29
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	29
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	29

PART II
Item 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	30
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	32
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	34
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	44
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	44
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	66
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	66
Item 9B	Other Information	68

PART III
Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	69
Item 11	Executive Compensation	69
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	69
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	69
Item 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	69

PART IV

Item 15	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	70

Financial Statement Schedules		70

Signatures		74


Job Classification	2012		2011
Employed physicians		1,096		972
Nurse practitioners and physician assistants		322		229
Independent contracted physicians		213		216
Non-clinical employees		750		613

Total		2,381		2,030


	High		Low
2012
4th Quarter	$	47.07	$	34.40
3rd Quarter	$	48.07	$	41.91
2nd Quarter	$	45.32	$	34.21
1st Quarter	$	45.94	$	30.61
2011
4th Quarter	$	48.29	$	35.08
3rd Quarter	$	52.23	$	35.32
2nd Quarter	$	52.25	$	43.27
1st Quarter	$	46.50	$	36.42


	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010			2009			2008
	(dollars in thousands except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenue	$	523,485		$	457,467		$	363,402		$	310,521		$	251,179
Operating expenses:
Cost of services—physician practice salaries, benefits and other		382,934			334,984			261,523			225,801			181,850
General and administrative		83,679			73,259			59,677			51,496			44,701
Net change in fair value of contingent consideration		324			(1,002	)		194			(158	)		—
Depreciation and amortization		3,911			3,192			2,689			2,295			2,146
Litigation loss and professional liability settlements(1)		—			—			—			750			—

Total operating expenses		470,848			410,433			324,083			280,184			228,697

Income from operations		52,637			47,034			39,319			30,337			22,482
Investment income		14			17			23			84			604
Interest expense		(337	)		(185	)		(104	)		(293	)		(868	)

Income before income taxes		52,314			46,866			39,238			30,128			22,218
Income tax provision		19,728			17,597			14,984			11,501			8,664

Net income		32,586			29,269			24,254			18,627			13,554
Income allocable to preferred stockholders(3)		—			—			—			—			(696	)

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	32,586		$	29,269		$	24,254		$	18,627		$	12,858

Per share data:
Net income per share attributable to common stockholders—historical(2):
Basic	$	1.97		$	1.79		$	1.49		$	1.16		$	0.88

Diluted	$	1.92		$	1.74		$	1.46		$	1.14		$	0.87

Net income per share attributable to common stockholders—pro forma(3):
Basic		N/A			N/A			N/A			N/A		$	0.89

Diluted		N/A			N/A			N/A			N/A		$	0.88

Other Operating Data:
Number of patient encounters		5,496,000			4,762,000			3,810,000			3,294,000			2,790,000
Hospitalists—employed at end of year		1,418			1,201			1,032			808			659
Other Financial Information:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	39,828		$	25,761		$	29,634		$	23,484		$	14,368
Net cash used in investing activities		(66,214	)		(31,122	)		(43,890	)		(22,112	)		(31,460	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		24,848			4,178			1,718			(7,293	)		47,510
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,538	)		(1,183	)		(12,538	)		(5,921	)		30,418
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,214		$	17,752		$	18,935		$	31,473		$	37,394
Total assets		388,058			304,914			258,978			188,212			162,691
Total debt including current portion of long-term debt		20,000			—			—			—			8,839
Total stockholders’ equity		256,371			212,652			174,465			145,077			122,947


	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Operating data—patient encounters		5,496,000			4,762,000			3,810,000

Net revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Operating expenses:
Cost of services—physician practice salaries, benefits and other		73.2	%		73.2	%		72.0	%
General and administrative		16.0	%		16.0	%		16.4	%
Net change in fair value of contingent consideration		0.1	%		(0.2	)%		0.1	%
Depreciation and amortization		0.6	%		0.7	%		0.7	%

Total operating expenses		89.9	%		89.7	%		89.2	%

Income from operations		10.1	%		10.3	%		10.8	%
Interest expense		(0.1	)%		(0.1	)%		—	%

Income before income taxes		10.0	%		10.2	%		10.8	%
Income tax provision		3.8	%		3.8	%		4.1	%

Net income		6.2	%		6.4	%		6.7	%


	Due in Years Ended December 31,
	Total		2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		Thereafter
	(dollars in thousands)
Operating lease obligations	$	7,347	$	3,245	$	1,569	$	1,127	$	773	$	442	$	191
Acquisition earn-out payments(1)		29,533		16,303		13,230		—		—		—		—
Medical malpractice reserves—reported claims (2)		26,920		9,846		7,258		4,101		2,111		1,365		2,239

Subtotal—contractual obligations		63,800		29,394		22,057		5,228		2,884		1,807		2,430
Medical malpractice reserve—incurred but not reported (2)		21,351		504		2,627		5,367		5,859		3,731		3,263

Total contractual obligations and reserves	$	85,151	$	29,898	$	24,684	$	10,595	$	8,743	$	5,538	$	5,693


Statement	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		46
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011		47
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		48
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		49
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010		50
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		51


	As of December 31,
	2012		2011
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,214	$	17,752
Accounts receivable, net		79,612		68,010
Insurance receivable for malpractice claims—current portion		9,719		8,693
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		17,284		13,139

Total current assets		122,829		107,594
Property and equipment, net		5,763		5,112
Goodwill		240,009		173,688
Other intangible assets, net		2,133		1,812
Deferred tax assets, net		250		1,522
Insurance receivable for malpractice claims—less current portion		17,074		15,186

Total assets	$	388,058	$	304,914

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	4,257	$	3,962
Accrued compensation		28,615		21,640
Payable for practice acquisitions		29,038		23,724
Medical malpractice and self-insurance reserves, current portion		10,350		9,383
Deferred tax liabilities		1,506		750

Total current liabilities		73,766		59,459
Long-term debt		20,000		0
Medical malpractice and self-insurance reserves, less current portion		37,921		32,803

Total liabilities		131,687		92,262
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, none issued		0		0
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 16,694,215 and 16,474,988 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively		17		16
Additional paid-in capital		150,711		139,579
Retained earnings		105,643		73,057

Total stockholders’ equity		256,371		212,652

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	388,058	$	304,914


	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings		Total
Balance at December 31, 2009		16,161,813	$	16	$	125,527		$	19,534	$	145,077
Issuance of common stock		125,564		0		1,469			0		1,469
Stock-based compensation expense		0		0		3,192			0		3,192
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		0		0		473			0		473
Net income		0		0		0			24,254		24,254

Balance at December 31, 2010		16,287,377		16		130,661			43,788		174,465
Issuance of common stock		187,611		0		2,908			0		2,908
Stock-based compensation expense		0		0		4,783			0		4,783
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		0		0		1,270			0		1,270
Tax deficiency and stock forfeiture related to stock-based compensation		0		0		(43	)		0		(43	)
Net income		0		0		0			29,269		29,269

Balance at December 31, 2011		16,474,988		16		139,579			73,057		212,652
Issuance of common stock		219,227		1		3,859			0		3,860
Stock-based compensation expense		0		0		6,344			0		6,344
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		0		0		988			0		988
Tax deficiency and stock forfeiture related to stock-based compensation		0		0		(59	)		0		(59	)
Net income		0		0		0			32,586		32,586

Balance at December 31, 2012		16,694,215	$	17	$	150,711		$	105,643	$	256,371


	2012		2011
Allowance for uncollectible accounts	$	4,837	$	4,831


	2012			2011
Percentage of receivables from Medicare and Medicaid		36	%		36	%


	2012			2011
Furniture	$	2,491		$	2,316
Computer equipment and software		16,226			13,084
Office equipment		1,876			1,840
Leasehold improvements		950			698

		21,543			17,938
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(15,780	)		(12,826	)

	$	5,763		$	5,112


	2012		2011
Goodwill—beginning balance at January 1	$	173,688	$	149,289
Goodwill acquired during year		66,321		24,399

Goodwill—ending balance at December 31	$	240,009	$	173,688


	2012			2011
Non-compete agreements	$	1,916		$	1,689
Hospital contracts		5,270			4,233
Trade name		70			70

		7,256			5,992
Less: Accumulated amortization		(5,123	)		(4,180	)

	$	2,133		$	1,812


	2012			2011
Acquired assets—paid and accrued:
Goodwill	$	66,321		$	24,399
Other intangible assets		1,264			445
Property and equipment		10			10

Total acquired assets		67,595			24,854

Cash paid for acquisitions:
Current year transactions		(40,014	)		(15,110	)
Contingent consideration		(22,565	)		(12,477	)
Other—prior year transactions		(26	)		(256	)

Total cash paid for acquisitions		(62,605	)		(27,843	)

Increase (decrease) in payable for practice acquisitions		4,990			(2,989	)
Net change in fair value of contingent consideration		324			(1,002	)

Net change in payable for practice acquisitions		5,314			(3,991	)
Payable for practice acquisitions, beginning of period		23,724			27,715

Payable for practice acquisitions, end of period	$	29,038		$	23,724


	2012			2011
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards	$	625		$	597
Allowance for uncollectible accounts		1,908			1,920
Compensation accruals		1,354			1,304
Accrued IBNR claims		8,473			7,277
Stock-based compensation		5,148			3,396
State taxes and credits		2,202			1,036
Other		158			188

Total deferred tax assets		19,868			15,718
Less: Valuation allowance		(1,229	)		(422	)

Deferred tax assets, net		18,639			15,296
Deferred tax liabilities:
Prepaid insurance		(4,709	)		(3,730	)
Depreciation and amortization		(15,186	)		(10,794	)

Total deferred tax liabilities		(19,895	)		(14,524	)

Total net deferred tax (liability) asset	$	(1,256	)	$	772


Reconciliation of Gross Unrecognized Tax Benefits	2012			2011			2010
Beginning Balance, excluding interest and penalties of $0, $10 and $88, respectively	$	66		$	88		$	281
Increases—tax positions taken in prior years		0			0			0
Decreases—tax provisions taken in prior years		0			0			0
Current year tax positions		0			0			0
Settlements		0			0			0
Expiring NOL		(66	)		0			0
Lapse of statute of limitations		0			(22	)		(193	)

Ending Balance, excluding interest and penalties of $0, $0 and $10, respectively	$	0		$	66		$	88


	Total Unrecognized Compensation Cost		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
			(Years)
Stock option	$	7,362		2.30

Restricted stock	$	2,456		2.17


	For Years Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Risk-free interest rate		1.21	%		2.39	%		1.26	%
Expected volatility		39.86	%		39.24	%		40.00	%
Expected option life (in years)		6.16			6.17			5.95
Expected dividend yield		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%


	Shares			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Weighted- Average Fair Value
						(Years)		(in 000’s)
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2011		1,581,332		$	25.92					$	11.02
Changes during period:
Granted		216,800			37.29						14.96
Exercised		(163,597	)		17.15						7.18
Cancelled/Forfeited		(934	)		1.42						0.28
Expired		(2,680	)		0.77						0.14

Options outstanding as of December 31, 2012		1,630,921		$	28.36		6.93	$	20,759	$	11.95

Options exercisable as of December 31, 2012		1,101,453		$	23.62		6.27	$	18,813	$	9.98


	Shares			Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Weighted- Average Fair Value
				(Years)		(in 000’s)
Restricted/performance stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2011		31,496						$	40.87
Changes during period:
Granted		80,535							36.57
Released		(10,091	)						35.17

Restricted/performance stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2012		101,940			2.67	$	4,048	$	38.03


2013	$	3,245
2014		1,569
2015		1,127
2016		773
2017		442
Thereafter		191

	$	7,347


	Quoted Price In Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Balance
Accrued contingent consideration for practice acquisitions (included in payable for practice acquisitions)	$	0	$	0	$	28,834	$	28,834


Accrued contingent consideration for practice acquisitions	2012			2011
Beginning balance	$	23,624		$	27,459
Addition through acquisition transactions		27,451			9,643
Change in fair value realized		324			(1,002	)
Payments		(22,565	)		(12,476	)

Ending balance	$	28,834		$	23,624


	Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 31,
	2012			2012			2012			2012			2011			2011			2011			2011
Net revenue	$	137,569		$	127,651		$	128,472		$	129,793		$	117,863		$	114,485		$	111,732		$	113,387
Income from operations		13,950			12,368			12,630			13,689			13,538			10,482			10,546			12,468
Investment income		3			3			4			4			5			3			4			5
Interest expense		(85	)		(78	)		(92	)		(82	)		(79	)		(62	)		(22	)		(22	)

Income before income taxes		13,868			12,293			12,542			13,611			13,464			10,423			10,528			12,451
Income tax provision		5,419			4,501			4,703			5,105			4,904			3,961			4,000			4,732

Net income		8,449			7,792			7,839			8,506			8,560			6,462			6,528			7,719

Per share data:
Net income per share(1):
Basic	$	0.51		$	0.47		$	0.47		$	0.52		$	0.52		$	0.39		$	0.40		$	0.47

Diluted	$	0.50		$	0.46		$	0.46		$	0.50		$	0.51		$	0.38		$	0.39		$	0.46

Weighted average shares:
Basic		16,647,295			16,616,866			16,545,600			16,505,047			16,438,421			16,419,071			16,382,869			16,323,125

Diluted		17,062,431			17,060,848			16,931,098			16,860,655			16,884,433			16,842,247			16,860,203			16,739,525


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

3.1*		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc.

3.2*		Amended and Restated Bylaws of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc.

4.1*		Form of Common Stock Certificate

10.1*†		IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. 2007 Equity Participation Plan, dated July 19, 2007, and the forms of agreements used thereunder

10.2*†		Form of Indemnification Agreement between IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers

10.3*		Form of Management Agreement between a subsidiary of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. and each of its affiliated professional organizations

10.4		Form of Amendment to Management Agreement between a subsidiary of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. and each of its affiliated professional organizations (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33930) filed on February 22, 2010)


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

10.5		Credit Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2011, by and among IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc., the lenders named therein, and Wells Fargo bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, L/C issuer, Swing Line lender, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC as lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (File No. 001-33930) filed on August 9, 2011)

10.6		Security Agreement dated as of August 4, 2011 by IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (and each of the other Affiliates or Subsidiaries party thereto) in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (File No. 001-33930) filed on August 9, 2011)

10.7		Guaranty Agreement dated as of August 4, 2011, by IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (and each of the other Affiliates or Subsidiaries party thereto) in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (File No. 001-33930) filed on August 9, 2011)

10.8*		Master Security Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2007, by and between General Electric Capital Corporation and IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc.

10.9†		Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective August 5, 2009, between Adam D. Singer, M.D. and IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33930) filed on August 6, 2009)

10.10†		Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective August 5, 2009, between R. Jeffrey Taylor and IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33930) filed on August 6, 2009)

10.11†		Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective August 5, 2009, between Devra G. Shapiro and IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33930) filed on August 6, 2009)

10.12†		Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective November 1, 2011, between Devra G. Shapiro and IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33930) filed on February 23, 2012)

10.13†		Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective August 5, 2009, between Richard G. Russell and IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33930) filed on August 6, 2009)

10.14†		IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. Nonqualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan amended and restated effective as of March 19, 2008 (as amended on May 26, 2011) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K (File No. 001-33930) filed on June 2, 2011)

10.15*†		IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. Executive Change of Control Plan

10.16†		IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. Executive Change in Control Plan, effective March 3, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33930) filed on April 27, 2011)

10.17*†		2002 Equity Participation Plan of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (f/k/a Inpatient Consultants Management, Inc.) and the form of stock option agreement used thereunder


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

10.18*†		Written Consent of Inpatient Consultants Management, Inc. dated January 31, 2007 amending the 2002 Equity Participation Plan

10.19*†		1997 Equity Participation Plan of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (f/k/a Inpatient Consultants Management, Inc.) and the form of stock option agreement used thereunder

10.20*†		Amendment No. 1 to the 1997 Equity Participation Plan of Inpatient Consultants Management, Inc. dated April 29, 1998

10.21*†		Amendment No. 2 to the 1997 Equity Participation Plan of Inpatient Consultants Management, Inc. dated April 28, 1999

10.22*†		Amendment No. 3 to the 1997 Equity Participation Plan of Inpatient Consultants Management, Inc. dated October 10, 2000

10.23*		Form of Succession Agreement between an affiliated entity of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. and its founding doctor

10.24*		Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 7, 2002, by and between IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (f/k/a Inpatient Consultants Management, Inc.), the founding stockholders signatory thereto and the investors signatory thereto

10.25†		Employment Agreement, effective March 31, 2011, between Kerry E. Weiner, M.D. and IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33930) filed on April 27, 2011)

10.26†		Employment Agreement, effective November 1, 2011, between Richard H. Kline, III and IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K (File No. 001-33930) filed on February 23, 2012)

10.27†		Form of Performance Unit Agreement under 2007 Equity Participation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33930) filed on April 26, 2012)

10.28†		IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. 2012 Equity Participation Plan (Incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 12, 2012.)

10.29†		First Amendment to the IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. 2012 Equity Participation Plan (Incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 12, 2012.)

10.30†		IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference herein from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 12, 2012.)

21.1		Subsidiaries of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc.

23.1		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act.

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act.

32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

101.INS^		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH^		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL^		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF^		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB^		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE^		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


Signature		Title

/S/ ADAM D. SINGER, M.D. Adam D. Singer, M.D.		Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

/S/ R. JEFFREY TAYLOR R. Jeffrey Taylor		President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

/S/ RICK KLINE Rick Kline		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

/S/ FERNANDO J. SARRIA Fernando J. Sarria		Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

/S/ MARK J. BROOKS Mark J. Brooks		Director

/S/ THOMAS P. COOPER, M.D. Thomas P. Cooper, M.D.		Director

/S/ FRANCESCO FEDERICO, M.D. Francesco Federico, M.D.		Director

/S/ WOODRIN GROSSMAN Woodrin Grossman		Director

/S/ C. THOMAS SMITH C. Thomas Smith		Director

/S/ CHUCK TIMPE Chuck Timpe		Director