As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 22, 2007

Registration No. 333-            

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM S-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

VISA INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	7389	26-0267673
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

P.O. Box 8999

San Francisco, California 94128-8999

(415) 932- 2100

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Joseph W. Saunders

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors

Visa Inc.

P.O. Box 8999

San Francisco, California 94128-8999

(415) 932-2100

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

With copies to:

Kevin Keogh

Mark L. Mandel

S. Ward Atterbury

White & Case LLP

1155 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10036

(212) 819-8200

Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale of the securities to the public: At the restructuring closing date described herein, which is expected to occur as soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement and the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions to the closing of the restructuring.

If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box.  ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered	Amount to be Registered	Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share (1)	Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price (1)	Amount of Registration Fee(1)
Class AP common stock, par value $0.0001 per share	119,100,481
Class AP limited liability company interests	119,100,481
Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share	(2)
Class C common stock, par value $0.0001 per share	(3)
Class Canada common stock, par value $0.0001 per share	22,034,685
Class CEMEA common stock, par value $0.0001 per share	36,749,698
Class CEMEA limited liability company interests	36,749,698
Class EU common stock, par value $0.0001 per share	90,667,252
Class EU limited liability company interests	90,117,665
Class LAC common stock, par value $0.0001 per share	80,137,915
Class LAC limited liability company interests	80,137,915
Class USA common stock, par value $0.0001 per share	557,982,489
Class USA limited liability company interests	127,800,553
Initial limited liability company interests	(4)
Total			$1,537,266,000	$47,194.07

(1) Because there is no market for the securities to be received by Visa Inc. or cancelled in the restructuring, the registration fee is calculated based on the book value of securities pursuant to Rule 457(f)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

(2) Such presently indeterminable number of shares as may be issued upon conversion of the class USA common stock in accordance with the restructuring agreement and the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. Pursuant to Rule 457(i) under the Securities Act, no filing fee is required.

(3) Such presently indeterminable number of shares as may be issued upon conversion of the class AP common stock, class Canada common stock, class CEMEA common stock, class EU common stock and class LAC common stock in accordance with the restructuring agreement and the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. Pursuant to Rule 457(i) under the Securities Act, no filing fee is required.

(4) Will not be issued in specified amounts.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

DATED JUNE 22, 2007, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

PROXY STATEMENT—PROSPECTUS

RESTRUCTURING PROPOSED—YOUR CONSIDERATION IS IMPORTANT

Dear Member:

The boards of directors of Visa International Service Association, Visa U.S.A. Inc., Visa Europe Limited and Visa Canada Association have approved a restructuring agreement that contemplates a series of transactions by which Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada will become subsidiaries of a Delaware stock corporation, Visa Inc. The boards of directors of each of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada recommend that its members vote to approve the restructuring proposal. The restructuring agreement contemplates that Visa Europe will not become a subsidiary of Visa Inc., but a stockholder of Visa Inc. and will enter into a series of contractual relationships that will govern its relationship with Visa Inc.

We believe the restructuring will enable us to compete more effectively and better serve our customers. We also believe the restructuring will streamline decision making, facilitate business growth and enhance our ability to coordinate business on a global basis, while preserving our existing competitive advantages, such as strong local market relationships, expertise and execution. In addition, we believe that the restructuring will enable us to facilitate a common, global approach, where appropriate, to the legal, regulatory and competitive issues arising in today’s marketplace, while also presenting an opportunity to increase operational efficiency.

Upon completion of the restructuring, Visa Europe, Visa Europe Services Inc., or VESI, and certain members of Visa International in the unincorporated regions of Visa Asia Pacific, or Visa AP, Visa Latin America and Caribbean, or Visa LAC, and Visa Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa, or Visa CEMEA, and certain members of Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada will receive common stock of Visa Inc. of a class that corresponds to the applicable Visa region with which each member is associated. The purpose of the issuance of these regional classes of common stock is to facilitate a re-balancing, or true-up, of the ownership of Visa Inc. prior to an initial public offering of Visa Inc.’s common stock. In the true-up, each regional class of common stock will be converted into a new class of Visa Inc.’s common stock, based upon a conversion ratio that is tied to the relative financial performance of the applicable region during a certain period prior to a proposed initial public offering.

Upon completion of the restructuring, and without giving effect to the true-up process, Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock (excluding shares held by subsidiaries of Visa Inc.) will be comprised of:

• 426,390,481 shares of class USA common stock representing 55.01% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock;

• 62,762,788 shares of class EU common stock (series I and series III) representing 8.10% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock;

• 27,904,464 shares of class EU common stock (series II) representing 3.60% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock;

• 22,034,685 shares of class Canada common stock representing 2.84% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock;

• 119,100,481 shares of class AP common stock representing 15.37% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock;

• 80,137,915 shares of class LAC common stock representing 10.34% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock; and

• 36,749,698 shares of class CEMEA common stock representing 4.74% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock.

For a discussion of the risks relating to the restructuring, see “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9.

To approve the proposed restructuring, we require the affirmative vote of at least: a majority of the voting power of Visa International members; a two-thirds majority of the voting power of the Visa U.S.A. members; and an 80% majority of the voting power of the Visa Canada members.

We are seeking broad support in connection with the approval of the restructuring, and it is important that as many of Visa International’s, Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa Canada’s members as possible approve the restructuring.

We hope that we can count on your support during one of the most exciting times in Visa’s history.

Sincerely,

Joseph W. Saunders

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

Visa Inc.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved the Visa Inc. common stock to be issued under this proxy statement-prospectus or determined if this proxy statement-prospectus is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

This proxy statement-prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Visa Inc., which is contained in documents that were filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this document forms a part, but are not included in or delivered with this document. Information incorporated into this proxy statement-prospectus, but not included in or provided with it, is available to members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, without charge, upon request submitted to:

Visa Inc.

P.O. Box 8999

San Francisco, CA 94128-8999

OR

D.F. King & Co., Inc.

48 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

IN ORDER TO TIMELY RECEIVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION YOUR REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED NOT LATER THAN     .

The distribution of this proxy statement-prospectus and the offer and sale of the Visa Inc. common stock in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. This proxy statement-prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any Visa Inc. common stock in any state or other jurisdiction where, or to or from any person from whom, such offer or solicitation is unlawful or not authorized.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE RESTRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS	iii
SUMMARY	1
RISK FACTORS	9
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	29
THE PROXY SOLICITATION	31
GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE VISA CANADA MEETING	35
THE RESTRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS	37
THE GLOBAL RESTRUCTURING AGREEMENT	88
THE VISA INC. 2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN	102
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION	109
CAPITALIZATION	129
THE GLOBAL PAYMENTS INDUSTRY	130
BUSINESS OF VISA INC.	133
INFORMATION ABOUT VISA INTERNATIONAL	167
INFORMATION ABOUT VISA U.S.A.	169
INFORMATION ABOUT VISA CANADA	170
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF VISA INTERNATIONAL	171
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF VISA INTERNATIONAL	173
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA AND STATISTICAL DATA OF VISA U.S.A.	209
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF VISA U.S.A.	212
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION	243
MANAGEMENT FOLLOWING THE RESTRUCTURING	262
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT	280
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	286
MATERIAL CONTRACTS	287
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF VISA INC.	292
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF MEMBERS PRIOR TO AND AFTER THE RESTRUCTURING	307
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF THE RESTRUCTURING	362
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS	363
LEGAL MATTERS	370
EXPERTS	370
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION	370
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-1

i

Annex A	Global Restructuring Agreement
Annex B	Visa Europe Put-Call Option Agreement
Annex C	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Visa Inc.
Annex D	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Visa Inc.
Annex E	Opinion of Financial Advisor of Visa International Service Association
Annex F	Opinion of Financial Advisor of Visa U.S.A. Inc.
Annex G	Opinion of Financial Advisor of Visa Canada Association
Annex H	Opinion of Financial Advisor of Visa Asia Pacific
Annex I	Opinion of Financial Advisor of Visa Latin America and Caribbean
Annex J	Opinion of Financial Advisor of Visa Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa
Annex K	Visa Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan

The registered trademarks of Visa International include: “Bands-Design—Blue, White & Gold;” “Dove Design;” “Interlink;” “Life Takes Visa;” “PLUS;” “V Distribution & Design;” “V PAY;” “Verified by Visa;” “Visa;” “Visa Bill Pay;” “Visa Classic;” “Visa Corporate;” “Visa Electron;” “Visa Fleet;” “Visa Giro;” “Visa Infinite;” “Visa Mobile;” “VisaNet;” “Visa Platinum;” “Visa Purchasing;” “Visa Resolve Online;” “Visa Signature;” “Visa TravelMoney;” “Visa Vale;” “Visa Vale Pedagio;” and “World’s Best Way to Pay.” Upon completion of the restructuring, all of these trademarks will be the property of Visa Inc. or its subsidiaries. Other trademarks used in this proxy statement-prospectus are the property of their respective owners.

As of June 21, 2007, the exchange rate between U.S. dollars and euros was 1.3399 U.S. dollars per euro. As of March 31, 2007, the period end exchange rate between U.S. dollars and euros was 1.3374 U.S. dollars per euro, while the average exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 1.2316 U.S. dollars per euro. The exchange rates referred to above are based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in euros as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. We make no representation that the U.S. dollar or euro amounts referred to in this proxy statement-prospectus could have been or could in the future be converted into euros or U.S. dollars, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all.

As of June 21, 2007, the exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars was 1.0727 Canadian dollars per U.S. dollar. As of March 31, 2007, the period end exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars was 1.1530 Canadian dollars per U.S. dollar, while the average exchange rate for the year ended September 30, 2006 was 1.1424 Canadian dollars per U.S. dollar. The exchange rates referred to above are based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in Canadian dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. We make no representation that the U.S. dollar or Canadian dollar amounts referred to in this proxy statement-prospectus could have been or could in the future be converted into Canadian dollars or U.S. dollars, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all.

You should rely only on the information contained in this proxy statement-prospectus or other information to which we have referred you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different. Information on the web sites of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada is not part of this document. The information in this proxy statement-prospectus may be accurate only as of the date of this proxy statement-prospectus.

As used in this proxy statement-prospectus, references to “we” or “us” refer to Visa Inc., which is a recently incorporated Delaware stock corporation and which will become the parent company of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Inovant LLC, or Inovant, when the restructuring is completed.

The fiscal year end for each of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada is September 30.

ii

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE RESTRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS

The following are some questions that you, as a member of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Visa Canada, may have regarding the restructuring and the other matters being considered, and brief answers to those questions. We urge you to read carefully the remainder of this document, including the attached annexes, because the information in this section does not provide all of the information that might be important to you with respect to the restructuring and the other matters being considered.

Q: What is the restructuring?

A: We use the term restructuring to describe the series of mergers, exchanges and similar transactions, as a result of which Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Inovant LLC will become direct or indirect subsidiaries of a recently incorporated Delaware stock corporation, Visa Inc. We refer to Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe as incorporated regions and the three geographic operating divisions of Visa International: Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA as unincorporated regions. Members associated with the unincorporated regions are members of Visa International. Together, the incorporated regions and the unincorporated regions currently make up Visa’s six geographic regions. In the restructuring, Visa Inc. will issue shares of common stock to the financial institution members of Visa U.S.A., the financial institution members of the three unincorporated regions of Visa International, the financial institution members of Visa Canada, and to Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and VESI.

Upon the completion of the restructuring, Visa Europe will remain a separate entity, will not become a subsidiary of Visa Inc. and will enter into a series of contractual arrangements that will govern its relationship with Visa Inc. VESI will remain a subsidiary of Visa Europe.

Q: What are the reasons for the restructuring?

A: We believe the restructuring will enable Visa Inc. to compete more effectively and better serve our customers. We also believe the restructuring will streamline decision making, facilitate business growth and enhance Visa Inc.’s ability to coordinate business on a global basis, while preserving our existing competitive advantages, such as strong local market relationships, expertise and execution. In addition, we believe that the global restructuring will enable Visa Inc. to facilitate a common, global approach, where appropriate, to the legal, regulatory and competitive issues arising in today’s marketplace, while also presenting an opportunity to increase operational efficiency. The restructuring is also intended to facilitate an initial public offering of shares in Visa Inc.

Q: When will Visa Inc. conduct an initial public offering?

A: The loss sharing agreement, which forms a part of our retrospective responsibility plan (described below), provides that we must use our commercially reasonable efforts to complete an initial public offering within 120 days after the closing of the restructuring. If we do not complete the initial public offering within 240 days after the closing of the restructuring, the members’ obligations under the agreement may be suspended until we have completed our initial public offering, at which point the obligations under the agreement will be reinstated in full as if they had never been suspended. This 240-day period may be extended under certain circumstances. As a result, we intend to commence planning for an initial public offering after the completion of the restructuring. However, there are many issues that are outside of our control, such as market factors, that could prevent us from completing an initial public offering, and we may never do so.

Q: What is the recommendation of the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada to their respective members regarding the restructuring?

A: Each of the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada recommends that their respective members vote in favor of the restructuring and the other proposals described in this proxy statement-prospectus. In addition, each of the regional boards of directors of the unincorporated regions of Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA has recommended the restructuring to the Visa International board of directors.

iii

Q: If I am a member in one of the unincorporated regions and thus have a membership interest in Visa International, what will happen to my membership interest in Visa International in the restructuring?

A: In the restructuring, the bylaws of Visa International will be amended so that members of Visa International affiliated with one of the unincorporated regions (other than a sponsored member) will have an equity and a non-equity interest in Visa International. The equity interest will represent such members’ voting and economic rights in Visa International, and the non-equity interest will represent such members’ commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system. The equity interests will be converted into LLC interests in a transitory limited liability company, or LLC, and will be subsequently reallocated. Those reallocated LLC interests will then be converted into the right to receive shares of common stock in Visa Inc. The class of common stock that such members will receive upon the closing of the restructuring will correspond to the geographic Visa region with which they are associated. Their non-equity interests in Visa International will continue to be outstanding following the restructuring. For more information about the eligibility of our members to participate in the restructuring, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring—Equity Allocation to Members of Visa International in the Unincorporated Regions and Subsequent Adjustment.”

Q: What will happen to my membership interest in Visa U.S.A. in the restructuring?

A: In the restructuring, the bylaws and certificate of incorporation of Visa U.S.A. will be amended so that you will have equity and non-equity interests in Visa U.S.A. Your equity interest will represent your voting and economic rights in Visa U.S.A., and your non-equity interest will represent your commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system. Your equity interest in Visa U.S.A. will be converted into the right to receive shares of class USA common stock in Visa Inc. upon the closing of the restructuring. Your non-equity interest in Visa U.S.A. will continue to be outstanding following the restructuring.

Q: What will happen to my Visa Canada membership interest in the restructuring?

A: No membership interests in Visa Canada will survive the restructuring. Visa Canada members will enter into Canadian services agreements and related agreements with Visa Canada, which will embody their commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system. Their remaining membership rights will, if they so elect, be transferred to Visa Inc. in exchange for class Canada common stock. Those membership interests not exchanged will be converted into series B common shares of Visa Canada when it becomes an Ontario share capital corporation and, as part of the amalgamation of Visa Canada and Visa Canada merger sub, will ultimately become class Canada common stock of Visa Inc.

Q: Why is Visa Inc. issuing different classes of common stock to members from each of the different geographic regions?

A: Visa Inc. is issuing a separate class of common stock to the members of each of the different Visa geographic regions in order to give effect to the true-up process described below, and the provisions regarding the election of the regional members of the Visa Inc. board of directors.

Q: How many shares of Visa Inc. common stock will I receive?

A: The accompanying form of proxy to consent, in the case of members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A., or the accompanying form of proxy to vote, in the case of members of Visa Canada, sets forth the class and an estimate of number of shares of common stock that you will receive upon the closing of the restructuring. Both the class and number of shares of common stock that you receive upon the closing of the restructuring are subject to subsequent adjustment in the true-up process, as described below.

Q: How were the shares of Visa Inc. stock initially allocated among the various geographic regions?

A: The initial allocation of shares of common stock among the regions other than Visa Europe, which we refer to as the participating regions, was determined under a methodology that was agreed upon among the participating regions. It was based upon the projected net income to be contributed by each participating

iv

region in fiscal 2008. The same methodology was applied to the unincorporated regions of Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA, as was applied to Visa Canada and Visa U.S.A. In addition, there were certain negotiated adjustments that were made to the allocations to reflect, among other things, potential operating synergies and one-time adjustments to financial projections. The initial allocation of shares upon the closing of the restructuring is subject to subsequent conversion and reallocation as a result of the true-up process in order to better reflect the actual net revenue contribution of each participating region. The consideration to be received by Visa Europe was the result of a negotiation between the participating regions in Visa Inc., on the one hand, and Visa Europe, on the other hand. Upon the completion of the restructuring, Visa Europe will receive class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock that represents, without giving effect to any outstanding class EU (series II) common stock issued to Visa Europe, 8.4% of the outstanding shares of Visa Inc. common stock. Visa Europe will also receive class EU (series II) common stock representing 3.60% of our outstanding common stock, plus an additional number of shares of class EU common stock in order to gross up Visa Europe’s percentage ownership to at least 10% after giving effect to the outstanding shares of our class USA common stock that will be held by Visa U.S.A. This results in Visa Europe owning 11.70% of the outstanding shares of Visa Inc. common stock, of which 3.60% (plus any additional shares of class C (series II) common stock that may be issued in the future to Visa Europe) is in the form of class C (series II) common stock that is redeemable for an aggregate amount of $1.146 billion (less any dividends or distributions paid upon such shares and imputed interest on such dividends or distributions) upon the later of one year after the closing of the restructuring or the completion of our initial public offering.

Q: What is the percentage of shares that has been allocated to my region?

A: The shares of common stock that will be issued at the restructuring closing will initially be allocated on a regional basis as follows:

Region	Shares issued and outstanding after restructuring closing (not giving effect to the true-up)		Percentage ownership (not including VE’s class EU (series II) shares)				Percentage ownership (including VE’s class EU (series II) shares)
Visa U.S.A.(1)	426,390,481		57.06	%			55.01	%
Visa AP	119,100,481		15.94	%			15.37	%
Visa LAC	80,137,915		10.73	%			10.34	%
Visa CEMEA	36,749,698		4.92	%			4.74	%
Visa Canada	22,034,685		2.95	%			2.84	%
Visa Europe (2)	62,762,788		8.40	%			8.10	%
Visa Europe (3)	27,904,464		—				3.60	%
Visa Europe Total		90,667,252			8.40	%			11.70	%
Total	775,080,512		100.00	%			100.00	%

⁽¹⁾ Excluding shares of class USA common stock held by Visa U.S.A.

⁽²⁾ Excluding shares of class EU (series II) common stock, but including 549,587 shares of class EU (series III) common stock issued to VESI, a subsidiary of Visa Europe.

⁽³⁾ Class EU (series II) shares.

This initial allocation of shares will be subject to subsequent conversion into class C common stock or, in the case of Visa U.S.A. common stock, into class B common stock and reallocation in connection with the true-up. Thus you may receive a greater or lesser number of shares at that time.

Q: What is the true-up process and how does it work?

A: The initial allocation of shares was based primarily on each participating region’s projected net income contribution to the overall Visa enterprise in fiscal 2008, plus certain negotiated adjustments, which we refer to as the baseline amount. In order to reflect relative actual performance against projections, there will be a

v

subsequent conversion and reallocation of shares based on each participating region’s relative under- or over-achievement beyond certain percentage limits, which we refer to as tolerance bands, of its net revenue targets for the relevant four-quarter period, which we refer to as the measurement period. As a result of the true-up, each of the regional classes of common stock will be converted into class C common stock or, in the case of the class USA common stock, class B common stock, prior to the initial public offering of our common stock. Because the true-up calculation is based on relative financial performance among the regions, it is possible that a region could meet or exceed its net revenue goals and be allocated fewer shares as a result of the true-up if other regions were to outperform their revenue targets by a greater percentage.

If a participating region’s actual net revenue during the measurement period is not over 104% of its estimated net revenue and not below 98% of its estimated net revenue for such period, then that region’s applicable multiplier will be 1.0, and no adjustment will be made to that region’s baseline amount. If a region exceeds or falls short of its net revenue targets by an amount in excess of these tolerance band percentages, then the region’s applicable multiplier will equal the percentage difference between the actual and projected net revenues for the measurement period multiplied by 1.5. The upper tolerance band percentage will be increased from 104% to 108% if a region exceeds its marketing budget by more than 30% during the measurement period. The lower tolerance band percentage will be adjusted from 98% to 96% if the participating region’s actual marketing expense is less than 70% of the participating region’s projected marketing expense during the measurement period. The region’s adjusted amount equals the baseline amount multiplied by the applicable multiplier, plus an additional, negotiated amount for, among other things, a negotiated portion of the overall expected cost savings relating to the restructuring. Each participating region’s percentage ownership after the true-up will equal this adjusted amount as a percentage of the aggregate adjusted amounts of all the participating regions, multiplied by 0.916 (to exclude Visa Europe’s 8.4% interest represented by the class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock of Visa Inc. from the true-up calculation).

The measurement period will be the four quarters ending September 30, 2008; provided, however, that if Visa Inc. files a registration statement on Form S-1 for an initial public offering prior to the end of fiscal 2008, then the measurement period will be the four-quarter period ending with (and including) the latest quarter for which financial statements are included in the registration statement on Form S-1 on the date it is declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. In no event, however, will the measurement period be any earlier than the four quarters ending September 30, 2007.

In addition, the allocation of shares among the financial institutions that are members of the Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA regions is also subject to a separate adjustment in connection with the final allocation of shares within the unincorporated regions, as described below, based on the relative performance of each financial institution within the Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA regions, respectively, compared to the financial performance of all of the other financial institutions within its respective region during the measurement period.

Q: Within my participating region, how was the number of shares that I will receive calculated?

A: The allocation of shares among a participating region’s financial institution members will differ from region to region. With regard to Visa U.S.A., the shares will be allocated to each member of Visa U.S.A. in accordance with the Visa U.S.A. membership proportion as defined in the Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation. With regard to Visa Canada, the shares will be allocated to each member of Visa Canada based on its Visa card sales volume (as defined in the bylaws of Visa Canada) for the period from October 1, 1990 to the September 30 immediately preceding the date on which the restructuring is consummated. With regard to Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA, the shares will be allocated to eligible members of Visa International affiliated with such regions in accordance with a formula based on net fees paid by each financial institution member entitled to receive shares and the total payments volume and cash volume, which we refer to as total volume, of each such financial institution member. The formula measures the net fees paid by, and total volume of, a member financial institution entitled to receive shares in

vi

proportion to the aggregate net fees paid by, and total volumes of, all such member financial institutions within the applicable unincorporated region. The net fees and total volume components are weighted equally in determining the equity allocation of each eligible financial institution member of each of Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA. At the restructuring closing, the eligible financial institution members of Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA will receive an initial allocation of shares based upon net fees and total volume for each such region beginning on October 1, 2001 and ending on June 30, 2007. This initial allocation will be subject to adjustment based on the net fees and total volume of each member in proportion to the aggregate net fees and aggregate total volumes for all members within the applicable region during the period from October 1, 2001 through the last day of the measurement period for the true up. Visa Europe has advised us that the methodology for distributing shares to its members has not yet been determined.

Q: Are there any restrictions on my ability to sell or transfer my shares of Visa Inc.?

A: Yes. Following the restructuring, all of the shares of our common stock will be subject to a prohibition on transfer, with limited exceptions, until the third anniversary of the completion of a Visa Inc. initial public offering; provided, however, that in the case of the shares issued to members of Visa U.S.A., the shares will not be able to be transferred, subject to limited exceptions, until the later of the third anniversary of the completion of a Visa Inc. initial public offering or the final resolution of the covered litigation.

Q: Will I continue to have voting rights following the restructuring?

A: Yes. Until the completion of an initial public offering of Visa Inc. common stock, each holder of Visa Inc. common stock will be entitled to vote on all matters submitted to the stockholders for a vote.

Prior to our initial public offering, in connection with the true-up process, all of the shares of Visa Inc. common stock will be converted into a new class of common stock.

• Shares held by members of Visa U.S.A. will be converted into shares of class B common stock.

• Shares held by members of the AP, LAC, CEMEA and Canada regions will be exchanged for or converted into shares of class C (series I) common stock.

• Shares held by Visa Europe will be converted into shares of class C (series II) common stock and class C (series III) common stock, and shares held by VESI will be converted into shares of class C (series IV) common stock. The class C (series III) common stock held by Visa Europe (together with the class C (series IV) common stock held by VESI) will represent the initial 8.1% interest in Visa Inc. to be held by Visa Europe and VESI. The class C (series II) common stock held by Visa Europe will represent an additional 3.6% interest in Visa Inc. These shares of class C (series II) common stock will generally not be entitled to vote on any matters, and will be subject to redemption.

Upon the completion of our initial public offering of Visa Inc. class A common stock, holders of class B and class C common stock will cease to have voting rights, except in the case of certain extraordinary transactions and as may be required under Delaware law.

Each class of our common stock will vote on an as converted basis, which means that each class will be entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of shares of class A common stock into which such shares are convertible. The shares of our class B common stock and class C common stock will initially convert into class A common stock on a one-to-one basis, subject to adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and the like. In addition to adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and the like, the conversion ratio for the shares of our class B common stock may be adjusted in connection with our retrospective responsibility plan, as described below.

Q: Who will serve on the board of directors of Visa Inc.?

A: Joseph Saunders, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board, is currently serving as the sole director of Visa Inc. From and after the completion of the restructuring and until the completion of our initial public offering, our board of directors will consist of: 1) ten independent directors, who will comprise

vii

a majority of the total directors; 2) our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Saunders; and 3) seven financial institutional directors: (i) two directors elected by holders of our class USA common stock; (ii) one director elected by holders of our class Canada common stock; (iii) one director elected by holders of our class AP common stock; (iv) one director elected by holders of our class LAC common stock; (v) one director elected by holders of our class CEMEA common stock; and (vi) one director elected by holders of our class EU common stock. We currently anticipate that prior to the mailing of this proxy statement–prospectus we will have appointed our entire board of directors.

Q: After the closing of the restructuring, what will Visa Europe’s relationship be to Visa Inc.?

A: Unlike Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, Visa Europe will remain a separate entity and will not become a subsidiary of Visa Inc. in the restructuring. Visa Europe will retain its current structure as a U.K. limited liability company and will become a stockholder of Visa Inc. Visa Europe will also become an exclusive licensee of Visa Inc.’s trademarks and technology in Visa Europe’s region, and Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will provide each other with services.

Q: Why is Visa Europe not becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc.?

A: Visa Europe believes that by being owned and governed by its European member financial institutions, it will be best positioned to serve a borderless payment market in Europe, meet the goals of its member financial institutions, consumers and merchants, and support the European Union’s vision of a Single Euro Payments Area, or SEPA.

Q: What is the put-call option agreement?

A: The put-call option agreement is an agreement between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe under which Visa Inc. may, if there is a severe decline in the number of: (i) merchants in Visa Europe’s region that accept Visa-branded products; and (ii) automated teller machines in Visa Europe’s territory that accept Visa products, exercise a call option to purchase all of the share capital of Visa Europe after an initial public offering of Visa Inc. Under the agreement, Visa Europe may exercise a put option that obligates Visa Inc. to purchase all of Visa Europe’s share capital after the earlier of: (i) 365 days after the consummation of an initial public offering of the class A common stock of Visa Inc.; or (ii) 605 days after the closing date of our restructuring. If a put option or call option is exercised, it must be exercised for all of the share capital of Visa Europe. The price per share at which both the call option and the put option are exercisable is tied to a formula based on Visa Europe’s financial performance and the value of the Visa Inc. common stock.

Q: What are the major terms of the Visa Inc./Visa Europe agreements?

A: Under the terms of the framework agreement, Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Inovant, which we refer to collectively as the licensors, will grant to Visa Europe exclusive, irrevocable and perpetual licenses to use the Visa trademarks and technology owned by the licensors and certain affiliates within the Visa Europe region for use in the field of financial services, payments, related information technology and information processing services and participation in the Visa system, which we refer to as the field.

From the restructuring closing date until the earlier of: (i) one year from the restructuring closing date; and (ii) the filing of a registration statement on Form S-1 for a Visa Inc. initial public offering, the fee payable for the licenses will be $6 million per quarter. Thereafter until the later of: (i) the date our shares commence trading on an internationally recognized securities exchange; and (ii) 369 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, the fee payable for the licenses will be $142.5 million per year, payable quarterly, which we refer to as the quarterly base fee, reduced by an amount equal to $1.146 billion multiplied by the three month LIBOR rate plus 100–200 basis points. Three years after Visa Europe begins to pay the quarterly base fee, this fee will be increased annually based on the annual growth of the gross domestic product of the European Union. In each case, the quarterly base fee will be reduced by an amount equal to the product of the following: (i) our net initial public offering price per share; (ii) the number of shares of Visa Inc. held by

viii

Visa Europe (other than class EU (series II) or class C (series II) shares) that would have been redeemed immediately, but for provisions that delay the redemption of shares held by Visa Europe until one year following the date of the initial public offering; (iii) the three month LIBOR rate plus 100–200 basis points; and (iv) the number of days in that quarter which fall in the post-initial public offering period, divided by 365.

Visa Europe must comply with certain agreed global rules governing the use and interoperability of the Visa trademarks and the interoperability of Visa Inc.’s systems with the systems of Visa Europe. Certain changes requested by Visa Inc. need not be implemented by Visa Europe unless Visa Inc. agrees to pay for the implementation costs. In addition, the parties will guarantee the obligations of their respective members to settle transactions between such members, service global customers, participate in certain global sponsorships, manage certain global programs, establish rules for servicing global merchants, ensure that their customers and members require acceptance of globally accepted cards, maintain adequate capital levels to support their ongoing business operations and establish and comply with rules relating to the operation of the Visa enterprise. Visa Inc. will indemnify Visa Europe for any claims arising from activities within the field brought outside Visa Europe’s region and Visa Europe will indemnify Visa Inc. for any claims from activities within the field brought within Visa Europe’s region.

Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will provide each other with transitional and ongoing services similar to those services currently provided among Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Inovant, Visa Canada and Visa Europe. Visa Inc. will provide Visa Europe on an ongoing basis with authorization services for cross-border transactions involving Visa Europe’s region, on the one hand, and the rest of the world, on the other hand, as well as clearing and settlement system services between Visa Europe’s region and the rest of the world. Until Visa Europe’s regional clearing and settlement system is deployed, Visa Inc. will also provide clearing and settlement system services within Visa Europe’s region. In addition, the parties will share foreign exchange revenues related to currency conversion for transactions involving European cardholders as well as other cross-border transactions that take place in Visa Europe’s region until Visa Europe’s regional clearing and settlement system is deployed, at which time this arrangement will cease. The parties will also use each others’ switching and processing services.

Q: Will the restructuring affect the rules for qualification as a member of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Visa Canada?

A: The rules for the qualification of members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. will not change as a result of the restructuring. Visa Canada will no longer have members; instead Visa Canada’s relationship with former members of Visa Canada will be governed by services agreements.

Q: How will the restructuring affect my existing agreement(s) with Visa?

A: In general, and in the absence of a specific contractual provision requiring consent or notice in connection with a transaction like the proposed restructuring, your existing agreement(s) will not be affected by the restructuring.

Q: How does the retrospective responsibility plan work?

A: Our retrospective responsibility plan addresses potential liabilities arising from the litigation described under the heading “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Covered Litigation,” which we refer to as the covered litigation.

Upon the completion of the initial public offering of Visa Inc. common stock, we will deposit a portion of the net proceeds of the offering in an amount determined by the litigation committee (as described below) in an escrow account from which settlements of, or judgments relating to, the covered litigation would be paid.

The net initial public offering proceeds less the sum of: (i) the initial escrow amount, (ii) any funds retained by Visa Inc. for general working capital purposes and (iii) the $1.146 billion that is designated to redeem the Visa Europe class C (series II) shares, will be used to redeem a portion of the shares of class B common

ix

stock and the shares of class C common stock (other than the class C (series II) common stock). The redemption price of these shares will equal the net initial public offering price per share.

The shares of class B common stock that are retained by Visa U.S.A. members and that are not redeemed out of the proceeds of the initial public offering will be subject to dilution to the extent of the initial amount of the escrow account. This dilution of the shares of class B common stock will be accomplished through an adjustment to the conversion ratio of the shares of class B common stock. These shares will not be able to be converted into shares of class A common stock or, subject to limited exceptions, transferred until the later of the third anniversary of our initial public offering or the final resolution of the covered litigation. The shares of class C common stock held by members other than the Visa U.S.A. members will not be subject to this dilutive adjustment.

After the completion of our initial public offering and at the request of the litigation committee, we expect to conduct follow-on offerings of our shares of class A common stock, which we refer to as loss shares, if the litigation committee deems it desirable to increase the escrow account. The proceeds from the sale of loss shares would then be deposited in the escrow account and the shares of class B common stock would be subject to additional dilution to the extent of the loss shares through a concurrent adjustment to the conversion ratio of the class B shares.

Any amounts remaining in the escrow account on the date on which all of the covered litigation has been resolved will be released back to us, and the conversion ratio of the shares of class B common stock then outstanding will be adjusted in the holders’ favor through a formula based on the released escrow amount and the market price of our stock.

Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Inc. expect to enter into a loss sharing agreement with some of the Visa U.S.A. members. The loss sharing agreement provides that the Visa U.S.A. members that are parties to the agreement will be responsible for a proportionate share of the liabilities associated with the covered litigation that might otherwise be borne by Visa U.S.A, Visa International or, in certain instances, Visa Inc. This proportionate share of each Visa U.S.A. member will be equal to such member’s membership proportion, as calculated in accordance with Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation.

Visa U.S.A. previously entered into a judgment sharing agreement with certain of its members that have also been named as defendants in the lawsuit filed by American Express, which we refer to as the Amex judgment sharing agreement. In addition, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International intend to enter into an interchange judgment sharing agreement with certain Visa U.S.A. members that have been named as defendants in the merchant interchange litigation and the Kendall litigation with regard to certain covered litigation. Under these judgment sharing agreements, the Visa U.S.A. members that are signatories will pay their membership proportion of the portion of a final judgment not allocated to the conduct of MasterCard. In the event that a final judgment is enforced against Visa U.S.A. or Visa International in the interchange litigation, the Visa U.S.A. member signatories will reimburse Visa U.S.A. or Visa International for the entire amount of the final judgment so enforced that is allocated to the conduct of MasterCard.

In order to avoid a double payment as a result of the dilutive adjustment in the conversion ratio of the class B shares upon the establishment of the escrow account, Visa U.S.A. members that have made certain payments pursuant to the interchange judgment sharing agreement, the loss sharing agreement or the Amex judgment sharing agreement will be reimbursed from the escrow account.

The members of Visa U.S.A. have indemnification obligations pursuant to Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements. After the closing of the restructuring, these indemnification obligations will continue with respect to the covered litigation, although we currently expect that, after the completion of our initial public offering, the initial escrow account and any additional proceeds from the sale of loss shares, which will subsequently be deposited into the escrow account, will be used first to resolve the covered litigation.

x

To the extent that the amount of the initial escrow and any additional sale of loss shares is insufficient to fully resolve the covered litigation and reimburse judgment sharing and loss sharing payments by Visa U.S.A.’s members, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to enforce the indemnification obligations of Visa U.S.A.’s members for such excess amount, including but not limited to enforcing indemnification obligations pursuant to the loss sharing agreement, Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements.

Q: What is the litigation committee?

A. The litigation committee will be established pursuant to a litigation management agreement among Visa Inc., Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and five individuals who are affiliated with, or acting for, certain Visa U.S.A. members. The litigation committee will: (i) determine the percent of initial public offering proceeds to be deposited in the escrow account; (ii) authorize the sale of loss shares, subject to Visa Inc.’s right to delay the filing or effectiveness of a registration statement relating to such loss shares under certain circumstances; and (iii) recommend or refer the cash payment portion of a proposed settlement of any covered litigation to the Visa U.S.A. board of directors.

Q: What proposals are the members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. being asked to approve?

A: Members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. are being asked to approve the following proposals:

First, a proposal to adopt and approve the restructuring agreement. Specifically, the members of Visa International are being asked to approve the mergers through which Visa International will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc. and the members of Visa U.S.A. are being asked to approve the merger through which Visa U.S.A. will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc.

Second, the members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. are being asked to approve the Visa Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan for Visa Inc., which we refer to as the equity incentive plan.

Q: What proposals are the shareholders of Visa Canada being asked to vote “FOR”?

A: Members/Shareholders of Visa Canada are being to asked to vote “FOR” the following proposals:

First, a resolution, to be approved by a majority of all votes eligible to be cast at the meeting, approving the restructuring agreement.

Second, a resolution, to be approved by 80% of all votes eligible to be cast at the meeting, amending the bylaws of Visa Canada to permit the transferability of members’ interests and to make other amendments to accommodate the restructuring.

Third, a resolution, to be approved by 80% of all votes eligible to be cast at the meeting, authorizing the application for supplementary letters patent to permit the transferability of members’ interests.

Fourth, a resolution, which we refer to as the conversion resolution, to be approved by 80% of all votes eligible to be cast at the meeting, authorizing the application for supplementary letters patent and the filing of articles of amendment and restated articles of incorporation to convert Visa Canada into a share capital corporation, to be named Visa Canada Inc., under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), or the OBCA.

Fifth, a special resolution, which we refer to as the amalgamation resolution, under the OBCA, to be approved by a vote of 66 ²/3% of the votes cast by the holders present and voting in person or by proxy of the shares of Visa Canada to be outstanding after the conversion referred to above, approving the amalgamation of Visa Canada Inc. and Visa Canada merger sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc.

Sixth, a resolution, to be approved by the members holding membership interests in Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada which, assuming the completion of the restructuring, would represent a majority of the outstanding shares of Visa Inc., approving the adoption of the equity incentive plan.

Q: When and where will the special meeting for Visa Canada take place?

A: The special meeting will be held on     , 2007, at 12:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) at the Offices of Visa Canada, Suite 3170, Scotia Plaza, 40 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario.

xi

Q: What approvals are required to approve the restructuring?

A: The adoption and approval of the restructuring agreement and the Visa International merger requires the written consent of members of Visa International representing a majority of the votes of the members that would be entitled to vote on such proposals at a meeting of the members of Visa International.

The adoption and approval of the restructuring agreement and the Visa U.S.A. merger requires the written consent of members representing a two-thirds majority of the total votes of voting members that would be entitled to vote on such proposals at a meeting of the members of Visa U.S.A.

The approval of 80% of all votes eligible to be cast at the meeting of Visa Canada members will be required to implement the restructuring in Canada; as well as 66 ²/3% of the votes cast by holders of shares of Visa Canada after the conversion referred to above that are present in person or by proxy at the meeting.

Q: Why am I being asked to approve the Visa Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan?

A: We believe that encouraging stock ownership by our employees and directors helps align their interests with those of our stockholders and helps us attract, motivate and retain employees and directors. Accordingly, we expect that this plan will promote our long-term success and increase stockholder value. The equity incentive plan would allow us to grant stock options, restricted stock and other stock-based awards. Some of the awards under this plan would provide opportunities for beneficial tax treatment to our employees if this plan is approved by our members.

Q: What approvals are required to approve the equity incentive plan?

A: To approve the equity incentive plan, we are seeking the approval of the members holding membership interests in Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, which, assuming the completion of the restructuring, would represent a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Visa Inc. immediately after the closing. We are also obtaining the approval of the equity incentive plan by Visa International, the sole stockholder of Visa Inc. prior to the restructuring.

Q: How do members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. submit their proxies to consent?

A: After you have carefully read this entire proxy statement-prospectus, please submit your proxy in any one of the following ways:

• By Internet. Log on to the following web site:     . In order for us to verify your identity, you will be asked to provide your     -digit Control Number (located in the bottom left corner of the form of proxy accompanying this proxy statement-prospectus). Once you have provided your     -digit Control Number please follow the instructions that are provided online in order to submit your proxy to consent over the Internet;

• By Phone. Call the following phone number:     . In order for us to verify your identity, you will be asked to provide your     -digit Control Number (located in the bottom left corner of the form of proxy accompanying this proxy statement-prospectus). Once you have provided your     -digit Control Number a representative will walk you through the instructions to submit your proxy over the phone; or

• In Writing. Sign and date the form of proxy accompanying this proxy statement-prospectus and return it by:

• E-mail. Send a portable document format (PDF) copy of both sides of the completed proxy to the following e-mail address:     ;

• Fax. Send a copy of both sides of the completed proxy to the following toll-free fax number     ; or

• Mail. Send the completed proxy in the provided postage-paid envelope or courier pouch.

xii

Q: Can members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. revoke their proxies once given?

A: Any proxy given by a member of Visa International or Visa U.S.A. may be revoked at any time before consents from members representing the requisite number of votes required to adopt and approve the matters under consideration are delivered to Visa International or Visa U.S.A., respectively. Proxies may be revoked by delivering a notice of revocation of consent to      in the case of Visa International or      in the case of Visa U.S.A.

Q: How do members/shareholders of Visa Canada vote?

A: A registered member of Visa Canada may attend the meeting and vote in person. After the conversion resolution becomes effective, a registered member of Visa Canada that has not exchanged its membership interest for Visa Inc. class Canada common stock automatically becomes a registered shareholder of Visa Canada Inc. and can also vote on the amalgamation resolution in person at the meeting. Alternatively, a registered member/shareholder may by means of a proxy appoint a person as nominee to attend and act at the meeting on the member/shareholder’s behalf. A proxy must be executed by the member/shareholder. Proxies must be deposited with Visa Canada.

Q: Can members/shareholders of Visa Canada change their vote?

A: A registered member of Visa Canada can change its vote by submitting a new proxy to Visa Canada no later than      on      or by attending the meeting and voting its interests/shares in person. A registered member of Visa Canada may also revoke its proxy by delivering written notice to Visa Canada on or before      or to the Chairman of the meeting at the meeting.

Q: When do you expect to complete the restructuring?

A: We anticipate that the restructuring will be completed as soon as practicable after all of the conditions to the restructuring are satisfied, including the requisite approval of the members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada of the restructuring agreement, the receipt of certain U.K. and Canadian tax approvals and the receipt of all other required governmental or other consents.

Q: What will happen if the members do not approve the proposed transactions?

A: If the restructuring does not receive the requisite approvals, or if the restructuring is not completed for any reason, the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada intend to continue to operate these companies in their current forms.

Q: What are my rights if I vote against or do not consent to the proposed transactions, but the proposed transactions are nevertheless approved by the requisite approval of members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada?

A: The restructuring will be completed if all of the applicable conditions contained in the restructuring agreement are satisfied, including the requisite approvals by the members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada. A Visa Canada shareholder may dissent with respect to the amalgamation by following certain procedures described in this proxy statement-prospectus. If the amalgamation of Visa Canada is completed, a dissenting shareholder that has complied with the procedures will be entitled to be paid the fair value of its common shares of Visa Canada. However, pursuant to Delaware law, members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. will not be entitled to appraisal rights or similar rights in connection with the Visa International merger or the Visa U.S.A. merger. Members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Visa Canada that have the right to consent or vote, but do not do so, will nevertheless have the right to receive Visa Inc. common stock in connection with the restructuring, unless (in the case of Visa Canada shareholders) they exercise their dissent rights.

xiii

Q: What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the restructuring and the true-up?

A: We have not requested that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service issue a ruling on the restructuring and the true-up. However, based on the opinion of our special tax counsel, we believe that, subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in “United States Federal Income Tax Considerations,” the members of Visa International and the members of Visa U.S.A. will not recognize any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the restructuring and the true-up, except that any such member may recognize imputed interest income with respect to a portion of any Visa Inc. stock received in connection with the true-up.

If a stockholder is not a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Visa Inc. may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% of the imputed interest, or, if applicable, at a lower treaty rate. Members should consult their local tax advisors regarding the potential U.S. federal tax consequences, as well as the potential U.S. state and local tax consequences, of the restructuring and the true-up.

Q: What are the tax consequences of the restructuring and the true-up other than with regard to U.S. federal income tax?

A: Members of Visa International, Visa Europe, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada may be required to recognize income, revenue, gain or loss in connection with the restructuring and the true-up in jurisdictions outside the United States, as well as in any United States state and local jurisdictions. Members should consult their local tax advisors regarding the potential non-U.S. tax consequences, as well as the potential U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences, of the restructuring and the true-up.

Q: What are the accounting implications of the restructuring for members?

A: Members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada should consult their financial advisors regarding the potential accounting implications of the restructuring.

Q: What do I need to do now?

A: After carefully reading and considering the information contained in this proxy statement-prospectus, please complete, sign and date your form of proxy and return it in accordance with the instructions above.

Q: What happens if I don’t submit a proxy or vote?

A: Except with respect to Visa Canada shareholder approval of the amalgamation resolution, if you do not return a consent or proxy it will have the same effect as voting against the proposals. Therefore, it is very important that you register your approval by one of the methods outlined above.

Q: Who can help answer my questions?

A: If you have questions about this document, you should contact:

Visa Inc.

P.O. Box 8999

San Francisco, CA 94128-8999

or our proxy solicitor:

D.F. King & Co., Inc.

48 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

xiv

SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information from this proxy statement-prospectus. It does not contain all of the information that may be important to you. You should read carefully the entire document and the other documents to which this proxy statement-prospectus refers you in order to fully understand the restructuring and the related transactions. See “WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION” on page 370. Each item in this summary refers to the page of this proxy statement-prospectus on which that subject is discussed in more detail.

The Global Restructuring Agreement (Page 88)

The boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe have approved a restructuring agreement that contemplates a series of transactions through which Visa International, Visa U.S.A. Visa Canada and Inovant will become subsidiaries of a Delaware stock corporation, Visa Inc. Each of the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada recommends that its members vote to approve the restructuring proposal. The restructuring agreement contemplates that Visa Europe will remain a separate entity and become a stockholder of Visa Inc. In the restructuring, Visa Inc. will issue shares of common stock to the financial institution members of Visa U.S.A., to eligible financial institution members of Visa International affiliated with the Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA regions, to the financial institution members of Visa Canada and to Visa Europe and VESI. After the restructuring, Visa Inc. will conduct its global payments business through its subsidiaries, including Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Inovant.

In the restructuring, the bylaws of each of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. will be amended and restated so that certain members of Visa International (other than Visa Europe and Visa Canada) and of Visa U.S.A. will have an equity membership interest representing voting and economic rights in Visa International or Visa U.S.A., respectively, and a non-equity membership interest, representing the commercial and other rights and obligations with regard to participation in the Visa payments system as a member of Visa International or Visa U.S.A., respectively.

In the Visa International merger, the equity membership interests in Visa International will be converted into LLC interests in Visa International Transition LLC, a transitory entity, which we refer to as VI LLC, and will be subsequently reallocated to reflect the agreed-upon initial ownership percentages in Visa Inc. In the VI LLC merger, those LLC interests will then be converted into the right to receive shares of common stock in Visa Inc.

The class of common stock that you will receive at the closing of the restructuring will correspond to the geographic Visa region with which you are associated. Non-equity interests in Visa International or Visa U.S.A., representing commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system, will continue to be outstanding following the restructuring. The following is a discussion of the legal steps that we will take to achieve the foregoing economic results.

Visa International Merger

In what we refer to as the Visa International merger, VI Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware non-stock corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of VI LLC, which we refer to as VI merger sub, will be merged with and into Visa International, and Visa International will continue as the surviving corporation after the effectiveness of the Visa International merger. Upon the effectiveness of the Visa International merger, each of the outstanding equity membership interests held by members of Visa International (other than Visa Canada and Visa Europe) will be canceled in consideration of the issuance of limited liability company interests in VI LLC, which are substantially similar to the equity membership interests formerly held by such members and which we refer to as LLC shares. Such LLC shares will be issued ratably in accordance with the respective equity membership interests in Visa International.

1

Visa Europe’s entire membership interest in Visa International will be canceled, and Visa Europe will be issued LLC shares. In addition, prior to the Visa International merger, Visa Canada will cease to be a member of Visa International at the same time as its commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system will be embodied in a regional service agreement. Thus, Visa Europe and Visa Canada will not retain any non-equity membership interests in Visa International following this merger and the restructuring. Instead, the rights and obligations of Visa Europe and Visa Canada with regard to participation in the Visa payments system will be governed by, in the case of Visa Europe, the framework agreement and, in the case of Visa Canada, the regional services agreement and certain other agreements between Visa Inc., Visa International and Visa Canada. For a description of the agreements we are entering into with Visa Europe and Visa Canada, see “Material Contracts—The Framework Agreement,” “—The Put-Call Option Agreement” and “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring—The Canada Transaction Documents.”

Promptly after the effectiveness of the Visa International merger, the LLC shares will be converted and reallocated as regional classes of limited liability interests in VI LLC corresponding to five Visa geographic regions, reflecting the initial allocation to members of VI LLC of shares of Visa Inc., as follows:

(i) in the case of Visa U.S.A., 127,800,553 class USA LLC shares;

(ii) in the case of Visa Europe, 62,213,201 class EU (series I) LLC shares and 27,904,464 class EU (series II) LLC shares;

(iii) in the case of each eligible member of Visa International associated with the Visa AP region, a number of class AP LLC shares equal to 119,100,481 multiplied by such member’s initial ownership percentage, which is calculated based upon such member’s historical fees and total volume as compared with the historical fees and total volume of other eligible members of Visa International associated with the Visa AP region;

(iv) in the case of each eligible member of Visa International associated with the Visa LAC region, a number of class LAC LLC shares equal to 80,137,915 multiplied by such member’s initial ownership percentage, which is calculated based upon such member’s historical fees and total volume as compared with the historical fees and total volume of other eligible members of Visa International associated with the Visa LAC region; and

(v) in the case of each eligible member of Visa International associated with the Visa CEMEA region, a number of class CEMEA LLC shares equal to 36,749,698 multiplied by such member’s initial ownership percentage, which is calculated based upon such member’s historical fees and total volume as compared with the historical fees and total volume of other eligible members of Visa International associated with the Visa CEMEA region.

After this reallocation, VI LLC will be merged with and into Visa Inc., Visa Inc. will continue as the surviving corporation, the regional classes of LLC shares will be canceled and, in consideration for such cancellation, Visa Inc. will issue to the former holders thereof, on a one-to-one basis, shares of common stock of Visa Inc. corresponding to the same five geographic regions: (i) class USA common stock; (ii) class EU (series I) common stock and class EU (series II) common stock; (iii) class AP common stock; (iv) class LAC common stock; and (v) class CEMEA common stock.

Visa U.S.A. Merger

Visa U.S.A. merger sub is a newly formed Delaware non-stock corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc. On the business day immediately following the date on which the VI LLC merger occurs, Visa U.S.A. merger sub will be merged with and into Visa U.S.A., which we refer to as the Visa U.S.A. merger, and Visa U.S.A. will continue as the surviving non-stock corporation. Upon the effectiveness of the Visa U.S.A. merger: (i) each of the outstanding equity membership interests in Visa U.S.A. will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to the holder thereof of a number of shares of our class USA common stock equal to 426,390,481

2

multiplied by such holder’s initial Visa Inc. ownership percentage, which will be equal to the member’s membership proportion as defined in the Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation; and (ii) each of the non-equity membership interests in Visa U.S.A. will continue to be issued and outstanding after the closing of the restructuring.

Visa Canada Restructuring

Prior to the Visa International merger, the charter of Visa Canada will be amended to permit Visa Canada membership interests to be transferable, and the bylaws of Visa Canada will be amended to accommodate the vesting of the commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system of members of Visa Canada in service agreements. Prior to the Visa International merger, Visa Canada will surrender to Visa International its entire membership in Visa International, and at the same time Visa International and Visa Inc. will enter into a regional services agreement with Visa Canada to continue Visa Canada’s existing commercial rights with respect to the Visa payments system. At the closing of the restructuring, Visa Canada will offer to its members the opportunity to enter into separate services agreements with Visa Canada; Visa Canada and Visa International will offer to members of Visa Canada the opportunity to enter into separate trademark agreements with Visa International; and Visa Inc. will offer to members of Visa Canada the opportunity to enter into a support agreement with Visa Inc., all of which agreements are designed to enable members of Visa Canada to continue their existing commercial rights with respect to the Visa payments system.

On the business day after the date on which the VI LLC merger occurs, each eligible member of Visa Canada that has elected to do so will be entitled to exchange its membership interest in Visa Canada with Visa Inc. for a number of shares of Visa Inc. class Canada common stock equal to 22,034,685 multiplied by such member’s initial ownership percentage, which will be such member’s card sales volume (as defined in the bylaws of Visa Canada) during the period from October 1, 1990 through the September 30 immediately preceding the closing of the restructuring, expressed as a percentage of the aggregate card sales volume of all eligible members of Visa Canada during such period. Immediately following such exchanges, Visa Canada will be converted from a non-share capital corporation to a for-profit share capital corporation governed by the OBCA, with Visa Inc. receiving, as a member of Visa Canada, series A common shares of the converted Visa Canada, and eligible members of Visa Canada that did not previously elect to exchange their membership interests as described above receiving series B common shares of the converted Visa Canada. Visa Inc. will then transfer its series A common shares of Visa Canada to Visa Canada merger sub in exchange for common shares of Visa Canada merger sub.

As soon as practicable after the conversion of Visa Canada described above, Visa Canada, Visa Canada merger sub, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc., and Visa Inc. will enter into an amalgamation agreement, pursuant to which Visa Canada and Visa Canada merger sub will be amalgamated and, upon completion of the redemption referred to below, the combined entity formed by the Visa Canada amalgamation will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc. Upon the effectiveness of the Visa Canada amalgamation, all of the outstanding share capital of Visa Canada (other than the series A common shares held by Visa Canada merger sub) will be converted into redeemable preferred shares of the combined entity in the Visa Canada amalgamation, which will be immediately redeemed for (and Visa Inc. will issue to each eligible Visa Canada member then a shareholder of Visa Canada) a number of shares of our class Canada common stock equal to 22,034,685 multiplied by each eligible Visa Canada member’s initial Visa Inc. ownership percentage, all of the outstanding share capital of Visa Canada merger sub will be converted into 100 common shares of the combined entity formed in the Visa Canada amalgamation, and the series A common shares of Visa Canada held by Visa Canada merger sub will be canceled without payment. Upon the effectiveness of the Visa Canada amalgamation, the bylaws of Visa Canada will be the Visa Canada merger sub bylaws and the directors and officers of Visa Canada merger sub will become the directors and officers of Visa Canada.

3

Inovant U.S. Holdco Merger; VESI Share for Share Exchange

On the business day after the later to occur of the Visa U.S.A. merger and the Visa Canada amalgamation, Inovant, Inc. will be merged with and into Visa Inc., which we refer to as the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, and Visa Inc. will continue as the surviving corporation after the closing of the Inovant U.S. holdco merger. Upon the effectiveness of the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, all of the outstanding capital stock of Inovant, Inc. will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to Visa U.S.A., which is the sole stockholder of Inovant, Inc., of 3,791,455 shares of our class USA common stock. On the business day immediately after the date of the effectiveness of the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, VESI will deliver to Visa Inc. all of the limited liability company interests in Inovant then owned by VESI, in exchange for 549,587 shares of our class EU (series III) common stock.

True-Up of Merger Consideration

The initial allocation of shares of Visa Inc. common stock was determined under a methodology that was agreed upon among the participating regions. It was based primarily on each participating region’s projected net income contribution to the overall Visa enterprise in fiscal 2008. In addition, there were some negotiated adjustments that were made to the allocations to reflect, among other things, potential operating synergies and one-time adjustments to financial projections. In order to better reflect relative actual performance against projections, there will be a subsequent conversion and reallocation of shares, which we refer to as the true-up, based on each participating region’s relative under- or over-achievement of its net revenue targets during a certain four-quarter period. In addition, the allocation of shares among the financial institutions that are members of the Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA regions is also subject to a separate true-up based on the relative performance of each financial institution within the Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA regions, respectively, compared to the financial performance of all of the other financial institutions within its respective region during the measurement period. For more information about the true-up process, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring—True-Up of Merger Consideration.”

Retrospective Responsibility Plan (Page 95)

Our retrospective responsibility plan addresses potential liabilities arising from the litigation described under the heading “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Covered Litigation,” which we refer to as the covered litigation.

Upon the completion of the initial public offering of Visa Inc. common stock, we will deposit a portion of the proceeds of the offering in an amount determined by the litigation committee (as described below) in an escrow account from which settlements of, or judgments in, the covered litigation would be paid.

The net initial public offering proceeds less the sum of: (i) the initial escrow amount, (ii) any funds retained by Visa Inc. for general working capital purposes and (iii) the $1.146 billion that is designated to redeem the Visa Europe class C (series II) shares, will be used to redeem a portion of the shares of class B common stock and the shares of class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock). The redemption price for these shares will equal the net initial public offering price per share.

The shares of class B common stock that are retained by Visa U.S.A. members and that are not redeemed out of the proceeds of the initial public offering will be subject to dilution to the extent of the initial amount of the escrow account. This dilution of the shares of class B common stock will be accomplished through an adjustment to the conversion ratio of the shares of class B common stock. These shares will not be able to be converted into shares of class A common stock or, subject to limited exceptions, transferred until the later of the third anniversary of our initial public offering or the final resolution of the covered litigation. The shares of class C common stock held by members other than the Visa U.S.A. members will not be subject to this dilutive adjustment.

4

After the completion of our initial public offering and at the request of the litigation committee, we expect to conduct follow-on offerings of our shares of class A common stock, which we refer to as loss shares, if the litigation committee deems it desirable to increase the escrow account. The proceeds from the sale of loss shares would then be deposited in the escrow account and the shares of class B common stock would be subject to additional dilution to the extent of the loss shares through a concurrent adjustment to the conversion ratio of the class B shares.

Any amounts remaining in the escrow account on the date on which all of the covered litigation has been resolved will be released back to us, and the conversion ratio of the shares of class B common stock then outstanding will be adjusted in the holders’ favor through a formula based on the released escrow amount and the market price of our stock.

The litigation committee will be established pursuant to a litigation management agreement between Visa Inc., Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and five individuals who are affiliated with, or acting for, certain Visa U.S.A. members. The litigation committee will: (i) determine the percent of initial public offering proceeds to be deposited in the escrow account; (ii) authorize the sale of loss shares, subject to Visa Inc.’s right to delay the filing or effectiveness of a registration statement relating to such loss shares under certain circumstances; and (iii) recommend or refer the cash payment portion of a proposed settlement of any covered litigation to the Visa U.S.A. board of directors.

Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Inc. expect to enter into a loss sharing agreement with some of the Visa U.S.A. members. The loss sharing agreement provides that the Visa U.S.A. members that are parties to the agreement will be responsible for a proportionate share of the liabilities associated with the covered litigation that might otherwise be borne by Visa U.S.A., Visa International or, in certain instances, Visa Inc. This proportionate share of each Visa U.S.A. member will be equal to such member’s membership proportion, as calculated in accordance with Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation.

Visa U.S.A. previously entered into a judgment sharing agreement with certain of its members that have also been named as defendants in the lawsuit filed by American Express, which we refer to as the Amex judgment sharing agreement. In addition, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International intend to enter into an interchange judgment sharing agreement with certain Visa U.S.A. members that have been named as defendants in the merchant interchange litigation and the Kendall litigation with regard to certain covered litigation. Under these judgment sharing agreements, the Visa U.S.A. members that are signatories will pay their membership proportion of the portion of a final judgment not allocated to the conduct of MasterCard. In the event that a final judgment is enforced against Visa U.S.A. or Visa International in the interchange litigation, the Visa U.S.A. member signatories will reimburse Visa U.S.A. or Visa International for the entire amount of the final judgment so enforced that is allocated to the conduct of MasterCard.

In order to avoid a double payment as a result of the dilutive adjustment in the conversion ratio of the class B shares upon the establishment of the escrow account, Visa U.S.A. members that have made certain payments pursuant to the interchange judgment sharing agreement, the loss sharing agreement or the Amex judgment sharing agreement will be reimbursed from the escrow account.

The members of Visa U.S.A. have indemnification obligations pursuant to Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements. After the closing of the restructuring, these indemnification obligations will continue with respect to the covered litigation, although we currently expect that, after the completion of our initial public offering, the initial escrow account and any additional proceeds from the sale of loss shares, which will subsequently be deposited into the escrow account, will be used first to resolve the covered litigation.

5

To the extent that the amount of the initial escrow and any additional sale of loss shares is insufficient to fully resolve the covered litigation and reimburse judgment sharing and loss sharing payments by Visa U.S.A.’s members, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to enforce the indemnification obligations of Visa U.S.A.’s members for such excess amount, including but not limited to enforcing indemnification obligations pursuant to the loss sharing agreement, Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements.

Material Contracts with Visa Europe (Page 287)

The Framework Agreement

The relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will be governed after the restructuring by a framework agreement, which provides for trademark and technology licenses and bilateral services.

(i) Trademark and Technology Licenses

Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Inovant, as the licensors, will grant to Visa Europe exclusive, irrevocable and perpetual licenses to use the Visa trademarks and technology intellectual property owned by the licensors and certain affiliates within the Visa Europe region for use in the field of financial services, payments, related information technology and information processing services and participation in the Visa system. Visa Europe may sublicense the Visa trademarks and technology intellectual property to its members and other sublicensees, such as processors, for use within Visa Europe’s region and, in certain limited circumstances, outside the Visa Europe region.

From the restructuring closing date until the earlier of: (i) one year from the restructuring closing date; and (ii) the filing of a registration statement on Form S-1 for a Visa Inc. initial public offering, the fee payable for the licenses will be $6 million per quarter. Thereafter until the later of: (i) the date our shares commence trading on an internationally recognized securities exchange; and (ii) 369 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, the fee payable for the licenses will be $142.5 million per year, payable quarterly, which we refer to as the quarterly base fee, reduced by an amount equal to $1.146 billion multiplied by the three month LIBOR rate plus 100–200 basis points. Three years after Visa Europe begins to pay the quarterly base fee, this fee will be increased annually based on the annual growth of the gross domestic product of the European Union. In each case, the quarterly base fee will be reduced by an amount equal to the product of the following: (i) our net initial public offering price per share; (ii) the number of shares of Visa Inc. held by Visa Europe (other than class EU (series II) shares or class C (series II) shares) that would have been redeemed immediately, but for provisions that delay the redemption of shares held by Visa Europe until one year following the date of the initial public offering; (iii) the three month LIBOR rate plus 100–200 basis points; and (iv) the number of days in that quarter which fall in the post-initial public offering period divided by 365.

Visa Europe must comply with certain agreed global rules governing the use and interoperability of the Visa trademarks and interoperability of Visa Inc.’s systems with the systems of Visa Europe. In addition, the parties will guarantee the obligations of their respective members to settle transactions between such members, service global customers, participate in certain global sponsorships, manage certain global programs, establish rules for servicing global merchants, ensure that their customers and members require acceptance of globally accepted cards, maintain adequate capital levels to support their ongoing business operations and establish and comply with rules relating to the operation of the Visa enterprise. Visa Inc. will indemnify Visa Europe for any claims arising from activities within the field brought outside Visa Europe’s region and Visa Europe will indemnify Visa Inc. for any claims arising from activities within the field brought within Visa Europe’s region. For a description of the trademark and technology license arrangements, see “Material Contracts—The Framework Agreement.”

6

(ii) Bilateral Services

Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will provide each other with transitional and ongoing services similar to those services currently provided among Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Inovant, Visa Canada and Visa Europe. Visa Inc. will provide Visa Europe on an ongoing basis with authorization services for cross-border transactions involving Visa Europe’s region, on the one hand, and the rest of the world, on the other hand, as well as clearing and settlement system services between Visa Europe’s region and the rest of the world. Until Visa Europe’s regional clearing and settlement system is deployed, Visa Inc. will also provide clearing and settlement system services within Visa Europe’s region. In addition, the parties will share foreign exchange revenues related to currency conversion for transactions involving European cardholders as well as other cross-border transactions that take place in Visa Europe’s region until Visa Europe’s regional clearing and settlement system is deployed, at which time this arrangement will cease. The parties will also use each others’ switching and processing services.

Visa Europe will indemnify Visa Inc. for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought by Visa Europe’s member banks against Visa Inc., while Visa Inc. will indemnify Visa Europe for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought against Visa Europe by Visa Inc.’s customer financial institutions.

Put-Call Option Agreement

Upon the consummation of the restructuring, Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will enter into a put-call option agreement under which Visa Europe will provide us with a call option to require Visa Europe to cause its members to convey and deliver to us all of the issued shares of capital stock of Visa Europe. We may exercise the call option at any time following certain triggering events, which consist of severe declines in the number of merchants and the number of automatic teller machines in the Visa Europe region that accept Visa-branded products for the processing of payment transactions, provided that in no event will the call option be exercised prior to the closing of our initial public offering.

In addition, we will grant Visa Europe a put option to require Visa Inc. to purchase from the Visa Europe members all of the issued shares of capital stock of Visa Europe. The put option may be exercised by Visa Europe at any time after the earlier of: (i) 365 days after the consummation of an initial public offering of shares of Visa Inc.; and (ii) 605 days after the closing date of the restructuring. The price per share at which both the call option and the put option are exercisable is based upon a formula that is based upon, among other things, Visa Europe’s projected sustainable twelve month adjusted net operating income and the forward P/E multiple applicable to Visa Inc. common stock at the time the option is exercised, subject to certain adjustments. For a description of the put-call option agreement, see “Material Contracts—The Put-Call Option Agreement.”

Management Following the Restructuring (Page 262)

Joseph Saunders, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board, is currently serving as the sole director of Visa Inc. From and after the closing of the restructuring and until the closing of our initial public offering, our board of directors will consist of Mr. Saunders, ten independent directors (who will constitute a majority of the total directors) and seven directors drawn from our geographic regions (which we refer to as regional directors) as follows:

(i) two directors elected by holders of our class USA common stock;

(ii) one director elected by holders of our class Canada common stock;

(iii) one director elected by holders of our class AP common stock;

(iv) one director elected by holders of our class LAC common stock;

7

(v) one director elected by holders of our class CEMEA common stock; and

(vi) one director elected by holders of our voting series of class EU common stock.

We currently anticipate that prior to the mailing of this proxy statement-prospectus we will have appointed our entire board of directors.

Equity Incentive Plan (Page 102)

The equity incentive plan is intended to promote the long-term success of Visa Inc. and increase stockholder value by attracting, motivating and retaining our non-employee directors, officers, employees and consultants and those of our subsidiaries and affiliates. To achieve this purpose, the equity incentive plan allows the flexibility to grant or award stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance unit awards, performance share awards, cash-based awards and other stock-based awards to eligible persons.

The equity incentive plan would allow us to grant these stock-based incentive awards to non-employee directors, employees and consultants covering a total of up to      shares of the common stock. No awards have been made under the equity incentive plan. The compensation committee of our board of directors will have discretionary authority to operate, manage and administer the equity incentive plan in accordance with its terms. The compensation committee will determine the non-employee directors, employees and consultants who will be granted awards under the equity incentive plan, the size and types of awards, the terms and conditions of awards and the form and content of the award agreements. The compensation committee will be authorized to establish, administer and waive terms, conditions and performance goals of outstanding awards and to accelerate the vesting or exercisability of awards, in each case, subject to limitations contained in the equity incentive plan.

The equity incentive plan will become effective on the date it has been approved by the affirmative vote of both (a) the members holding membership interests in Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, which, assuming the completion of the restructuring, would represent a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Visa Inc. immediately after the closing, and (b) Visa International, the sole stockholder of Visa Inc. prior to the restructuring.

Risk Factors (Page 9)

You should carefully consider all of the information provided in this proxy statement-prospectus and, in particular, you should evaluate the specific factors described under “Risk Factors” for a description of the risks associated with our business and the restructuring.

8

RISK FACTORS

If the restructuring is completed, members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada will become our stockholders. Therefore, if you choose to approve the restructuring, you will be choosing to invest in our common stock. An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider each of the following risk factors and all other information set forth in this document before deciding whether to approve the restructuring.

Risks Related to Our Business

Legal and Regulatory Risks

Interchange fees are subject to significant legal and regulatory scrutiny worldwide, which may have a material adverse impact on our revenue, our prospects for future growth and our overall business.

Interchange fees are typically paid by acquirers to issuers in connection with transactions initiated with cards in our payments system. Interchange fees are often the largest component of the costs that acquirers charge merchants in connection with the acceptance of payment cards. We set default interchange rates in an effort to maximize system volume. As the volume of card-based payments has increased in recent years, interchange fees, including our default interchange rates, have become subject to increased regulatory scrutiny worldwide. We believe that regulators are increasingly adopting a similar approach to interchange fees and, as a result, developments in any one jurisdiction may influence regulators’ approach in other jurisdictions. In certain jurisdictions, default interchange rates are set by the government and not by us. Interchange fees and related practices are being or have been reviewed by regulatory authorities and/or central banks in a number of jurisdictions, including the United States, the European Union, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Germany, Hungary, Mexico, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. For example:

• The Reserve Bank of Australia has made regulations under legislation enacted to give it powers over payments systems. A regulation controls the costs that can be considered in setting interchange fees for Visa credit and debit cards. The Reserve Bank of Australia does not regulate the merchant discount charged by any payment system.

• The Commerce Commission, New Zealand’s competition regulator, filed a civil claim alleging that, among other things, the fixing of default interchange rates by Cards NZ Limited, Visa International, MasterCard and certain Visa International member banks contravenes the New Zealand Commerce Act. A group of New Zealand retailers filed a nearly identical claim against the same parties before the same tribunal. Both the Commerce Commission and the retailers seek declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief.

• In March 2006, Banco de México, the central bank of Mexico, reached an agreement with the Mexican Banks Association to implement a new, value-based interchange methodology. As part of Banco de México’s transparency policies, details of the new interchange rates have been publicly disclosed and are available on Banco de México’s web site.

Interchange fees have been the topic of recent committee hearings in the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, as well as conferences held by a number of U.S. federal reserve banks. In addition, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed a bill that would commission a study by the Federal Trade Commission of the role of interchange fees in alleged price gouging at gas stations. Individual state legislatures in the United States are also reviewing interchange fees, and legislators in a number of states have proposed bills that purport to limit interchange fees or merchant discount rates or to prohibit interchange fees or merchant discount rates from being applied to portions of a transaction. In addition, the Merchants Payments Coalition, a coalition of trade associations representing businesses that accept credit and debit cards, is mounting a challenge to interchange fees in the United States by seeking legislative and regulatory intervention.

9

If we cannot successfully defend our ability to set default interchange rates to maximize system volume, our payments system may become unattractive to issuers. This result could reduce the number of financial institutions willing to participate in our open-loop multi-party payments system, lower overall transaction volumes, and/or make closed-loop payments systems or other forms of payment more attractive. Issuers could also charge higher fees to consumers, thereby making our card programs less desirable and reducing our transaction volumes and profitability, or they could attempt to decrease the expense of their card programs by seeking incentives or a reduction in the fees that we charge. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse impact on our revenue, our prospects for future growth, and our overall business.

If Visa U.S.A. or Visa International is found liable in the merchant interchange multidistrict litigation, we may be forced to pay substantial damages.

During 2005 and 2006, a total of approximately 50 class action and individual complaints were filed on behalf of merchants against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard and other defendants, including certain Visa U.S.A. member financial institutions. The plaintiffs allege that Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa International’s setting of default interchange rates violated federal and state antitrust laws, among other antitrust allegations. The lawsuits have been transferred to a multidistrict litigation in the Eastern District of New York. The class action complaints have been consolidated into a single amended class action complaint, and the individual complaints are also being consolidated in the same multidistrict litigation. A similar case, filed in 2004, is on appeal by plaintiffs after having been dismissed with prejudice, and has not been transferred to the multidistrict litigation.

The plaintiffs in the multidistrict litigation seek damages for alleged overcharges in merchant discount fees, as well as injunctive and other relief. The plaintiffs have not yet quantified the damages they seek, although several of the complaints allege that the plaintiffs expect that damages will range in the tens of billions of dollars. Because these lawsuits were brought under the U.S. federal antitrust laws, any actual damages will be trebled and Visa U.S.A. and/or Visa International may be subject to joint and several liability among the defendants if liability is established, which could significantly magnify the effect of any adverse judgment. Failure to successfully defend or settle the multidistrict litigation would result in liability that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, or, in certain circumstances, even cause us to become insolvent. For a discussion of the multidistrict litigation, see “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Covered Litigation—Interchange Litigation.”

If Visa U.S.A. or Visa International is found liable in any of the cases brought by American Express or Discover, we may be forced to pay substantial damages.

In 1998, the U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard International in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The suit alleged, among other things, that Visa U.S.A. restrained competition by prohibiting its member financial institutions from issuing certain competing payment cards (such as American Express or Discover). The district court held that the prohibition constituted an unlawful restraint of trade under the U.S. federal antitrust laws, and this decision was affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. As a result of this judgment, the Visa U.S.A. bylaw that provided for the prohibition became unenforceable in October 2004 and was subsequently repealed.

American Express and Discover have each filed suit against Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard International, alleging that prohibiting member financial institutions from issuing competing payment cards caused them injury under the U.S. federal antitrust laws. American Express has sued other defendants as well, including certain Visa U.S.A. member financial institutions. Discover also alleges, among other antitrust allegations, that Visa U.S.A.’s “Honor All Cards” rule, which was in place until January 1, 2004 and required merchants in the United States to accept Visa debit cards if they accepted other Visa-branded cards, compounded the alleged injury caused by prohibiting member financial institutions from issuing competing payment cards. American Express also alleges, among other antitrust allegations, that Visa U.S.A.’s partnership agreements with certain of its members constitute exclusive dealing in violation of the antitrust laws. In connection with their respective claims, American Express and Discover each requested that the district court give collateral estoppel effect to the court’s findings in the judgment of the 1998 Department of Justice litigation. Although the district

10

court denied that request when made at the outset of the litigation, the district court indicated it would entertain a motion by American Express or Discover for collateral estoppel at a later time. If the court were to give collateral estoppel effect to one or more issues, significant elements of the plaintiffs’ claims would be established, making it more likely that Visa International and Visa U.S.A. could be found liable and that the plaintiffs would be awarded damages.

Neither American Express nor Discover has specified the amount of damages sought; however, each has conveyed its belief that these damages are substantial. Because these lawsuits were brought under the U.S. federal antitrust laws, any actual damages will be trebled and Visa International and Visa U.S.A. may be subject to joint and several liability among the defendants if liability is established, which could significantly magnify the effect of any adverse judgment. Failure to successfully defend against or settle these lawsuits would result in liability that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, or, in certain circumstances, even cause us to become insolvent. For a discussion of the American Express and Discover litigations, see “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Covered Litigation.”

If the settlements of Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa International’s currency conversion cases are not ultimately approved and we are unsuccessful in any of the various lawsuits relating to Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa International’s currency conversion practices, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

Visa U.S.A. and Visa International are defendants in several state and federal lawsuits alleging that their currency conversion practices are or were deceptive, anti-competitive or otherwise unlawful. In particular, a trial judge in California found that the former currency conversion practices of Visa U.S.A. and Visa International were deceptive under California state law, and ordered Visa U.S.A. and Visa International to mandate that their members disclose the currency conversion process to cardholders in cardholder agreements, applications, solicitations and monthly billing statements. The judge also ordered unspecified restitution to credit card holders. The decision was reversed on appeal on the ground that the plaintiff lacked standing to pursue his claims. After the trial court’s decision, several putative class actions were filed in California state courts challenging Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa International’s currency conversion practices for credit and debit cards. A number of putative class actions relating to Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa International’s former currency conversion practices were also filed in federal court. The federal actions have been coordinated or consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The consolidated complaint alleges that the former currency conversion practices of Visa U.S.A. and Visa International violated federal antitrust laws.

On July 20, 2006 and September 14, 2006, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International entered into agreements settling or otherwise disposing of the federal and state actions and related matters. Pursuant to the settlement agreements, Visa U.S.A. paid approximately $100 million as part of defendants’ settlement fund for the federal actions and will pay approximately $20 million to fund settlement of the California cases. The federal court has granted preliminary approval of the settlement agreements, but the settlement is subject to final approval by the court and resolution of all appeals. If final approval of the settlement agreements is not granted, all of the agreements resolving the federal and state actions will terminate. If that occurs, and we are unsuccessful in defending against some or all of these lawsuits, we may have to pay restitution and/or damages, and may be required to modify our currency conversion practices. The potential amount of damages and/or restitution could be substantial. In addition, although Visa U.S.A. and Visa International have substantially changed the practices that were at issue in these litigations, if the courts require further changes to the currency conversion and cross-border transaction practices, it could significantly affect the revenues received by Visa U.S.A. and Visa International from these transactions. See “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Currency Conversion Litigation.”

If Visa U.S.A. or Visa International is found liable in certain other lawsuits that have been brought against them or if we are found liable in other litigation to which we may become subject in the future, we may be forced to pay substantial damages and/or change our business practices or pricing structure, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability.

In actions filed in a number of U.S. state courts and the District of Columbia against Visa U.S.A., and, Visa International, in one state, plaintiffs assert claims under state antitrust statutes, consumer protection statutes and/

11

or state common law. The plaintiffs are suing on behalf of putative classes of consumers; one action was brought by the West Virginia Attorney General on behalf of consumers. The plaintiffs’ claims are based on allegations made in a lawsuit brought on behalf of a class of U.S. merchants against Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard International, which Visa U.S.A. settled in June 2003. The plaintiffs allege, among other things, that Visa U.S.A.’s former “Honor All Cards” rule had the effect of unlawfully “tying” the provision of credit and debit card services for merchants, that Visa U.S.A. attempted to monopolize an alleged point-of-sale debit card market, and that Visa U.S.A. deceived merchants about debit cards. The plaintiffs claim that this led merchants to pay excessive fees for debit card processing services, which the merchants, in turn, passed on to consumers. In addition, one merchant that “opted-out” of the merchant class action has filed suit against Visa U.S.A., challenging Visa U.S.A.’s former “Honor All Cards” rule, among other claims. See “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—U.S. Merchant Opt-Out and Consumer Litigations.”

Visa U.S.A. and Visa International have also been investigated or sued on a variety of other legal claims, including:

• a claim of patent infringement, misrepresentation, breach of contract and antitrust violations against Visa International, relating to a license agreement for smart card technology;

• a trademark infringement claim against Visa International in Venezuela in connection with the Visa Vale product;

• a patent infringement claim against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International, involving the Verified by Visa product;

• a promissory estoppel and misrepresentation claim against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International, regarding deferment of a deadline for laboratory certification of ATM devices meeting heightened data encryption standards;

• two state unfair competition law claims, one against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International alleging failure to inform cardholders of a security breach in a timely manner, and another against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International based in part on Visa U.S.A.’s past practice of prohibiting member financial institutions from issuing certain competing payment cards (such as American Express or Discover); and

• a Civil Investigative Demand to Visa U.S.A. from the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, in coordination with the Attorneys General of New York and Ohio, seeking information regarding practices related to PIN debit cards.

If we are unsuccessful in our defense against any of the proceedings described above, we may be forced to pay substantial damages and/or change our business practices or pricing structure, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability. For a discussion of these legal proceedings, see “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Intellectual Property Litigation” and “—Other Litigation.”

Limitations on our business and other penalties resulting from litigation or litigation settlements may materially and adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

Certain limitations have been placed on our business in recent years as a result of litigation and litigation settlements. For example, as a result of the June 2003 settlement of a U.S. merchant lawsuit against Visa U.S.A., merchants are able to reject Visa consumer debit cards in the United States while still accepting other Visa- branded cards, and vice versa. In addition, following the final judgment entered in the litigation the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, brought against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in 1998, as of October 2004, members of Visa U.S.A. may issue certain payment cards that compete with Visa-branded cards (such as American Express or Discover). For more information on the DOJ’s suit, see “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Department of Justice Antitrust Case and Related Litigation.” Since this final judgment, several members of Visa U.S.A., including, but not limited to, Bank of America, Citibank,

12

HSBC/ Metris, U.S.A.A., Barclaycard U.S., GE Consumer Finance, First Bank & Trust, Credit One, Central National Bank & Trust, and Brenham National Bank, have begun to issue, or have announced that they will issue, American Express or Discover-branded cards.

In June 2007, a federal court ruled that Visa U.S.A.’s settlement service fee violates the final judgment entered in the case the DOJ brought against Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard in 1998. For more information on the final judgment, see “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Department of Justice Antitrust Case and Related Litigation.” Visa U.S.A.’s bylaws provide that a settlement service fee is to be paid by certain Visa U.S.A. members that shift a substantial portion of their offline debit card volume to another debit brand unless that shift is to the American Express or Discover brands. As a remedy, the court ordered Visa U.S.A. to repeal the settlement service fee bylaw and to permit any Visa U.S.A. debit issuer subject to the settlement service fee prior to its repeal that entered into an agreement that includes offline debit issuance with Visa U.S.A. on or after June 20, 2003 to terminate its agreement, provided that the issuer has entered into an agreement with MasterCard to issue MasterCard branded debit cards and the issuer has repaid to Visa U.S.A. any unearned benefits or financial incentives under its Visa U.S.A. agreement. On June 13, 2007, the parties entered into an agreement to toll the statute of limitations on certain potential claims MasterCard may have against Visa U.S.A. in connection with the settlement service fee. Visa U.S.A. is analyzing the implications of the ruling for Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard and assessing next steps, including a possible appeal by Visa U.S.A. of the court’s ruling.

The developments discussed above, and any future limitations on our business resulting from litigation or litigation settlements, could limit the fees we charge and reduce our payments volume, which could materially and adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

The payments industry is the subject of increasing global regulatory focus, which may result in costly new compliance burdens being imposed on us and our customers and lead to increased costs and decreased payments volume and revenues.

We and our customers are subject to regulations that affect the payment industry in the many countries in which our cards are used. Regulation of the payments industry has increased significantly in recent years.

• Anti-money laundering regulation. Most jurisdictions in which we and our customers operate have implemented, amended or have pending anti-money laundering regulations. In 2002, we and our customers became subject to the provisions of the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act, which requires the creation and implementation of comprehensive anti-money laundering programs.

• U.S. Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control regulation. Visa International and Visa U.S.A. are subject to regulations imposed by the U.S. Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC. OFAC restricts financial dealings with Cuba, Iran, Myanmar and Sudan, as well as financial dealings with certain parties, such as identified money laundering fronts for terrorists or narcotics traffickers. While we prohibit financial institutions that are domiciled in those countries or are restricted parties from being Visa members, many Visa International members are non-U.S. financial institutions, and thus are not subject to OFAC restrictions. Accordingly, our payments system may be used for transactions in or involving countries or parties subject to OFAC-administered sanctions.

• Regulation of the price of credit. In recent years, a number of regulations relating to the price of credit have been implemented in some jurisdictions in which our cards are used. In the United States, regulators and the U.S. Congress have increased their scrutiny of our customers’ pricing and underwriting standards relating to credit. For example, a number of regulations have been issued to implement the U.S. Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, and other regulations are expected to be issued in 2007. One such regulation pertaining to risk-based pricing could have a significant impact on the application process for credit cards and result in increased costs of issuance and/or a decrease in the flexibility of card issuers to set the price of credit. Any regulation in this regard could result in a decrease in our payments volume and revenue.

13

• Other regulation

• Many jurisdictions in which our customers and we operate are considering, or are expected to consider, legislation with regard to Internet transactions, and in particular with regard to choice of law, the legality of certain e-commerce transactions, the collection of applicable taxes and copyright and trademark infringement.

• In recent years, federal banking regulators in the United States have adopted a series of regulatory measures intended to require more conservative accounting, greater risk management and higher capital requirements for bank credit card activities.

Increased regulatory focus in connection with the matters discussed above may increase our costs, which could materially and adversely affect our financial performance. Similarly, increased regulatory focus on our customers may cause a reduction in payments volume, which could reduce our revenues and materially and adversely impact our financial performance.

Existing and proposed regulation in the areas of consumer privacy and data use and security could decrease the number of payment cards issued, and could decrease our payments volume and revenues.

We and our customers are subject to regulations related to privacy and data use and security in the jurisdictions in which we do business, and we could be adversely affected by these regulations. For example, in the United States, we and our customers are subject to the banking regulators’ information safeguard rules and the Federal Trade Commission’s rules under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The rules require that we and our customers develop, implement and maintain written, comprehensive information security programs containing safeguards that are appropriate to our size and complexity, the nature and scope of our activities, and the sensitivity of any customer information at issue.

In recent years, there has been a heightened legislative and regulatory focus on data security, including requiring consumer notification in the event of a data breach. In the United States, a number of bills have been introduced in Congress and there have been several Congressional hearings to address these issues. Congress will likely consider data security/data breach legislation in 2007 that, if implemented, could affect our customers and us. In addition, a number of U.S. states have enacted security breach legislation, requiring varying levels of consumer notification in the event of a security breach, and several other states are considering similar legislation.

Regulation of privacy, data use and security may materially increase our customers’ and our costs and may decrease the number of our cards that our customers issue, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability. Failure to comply with the privacy and data use and security laws and regulations to which we are subject could result in fines, sanctions and damage to our global reputation and our brand.

Government actions may prevent us from competing effectively in the domestic payment markets of certain countries, which could impair our ability to maintain or increase our revenues.

Governments in certain countries have acted, or could act, to provide resources or protection to selected national payment card providers or national payment processing providers to support domestic competitors or to displace us from, prevent us from entering into, or substantially restrict us from participating in, particular geographic markets. For example, our members in China are not permitted to issue our cards for domestic use in China. Governments in certain countries that were formerly part of the Soviet Union have considered similar restrictions from time to time. Our efforts to effect change in countries where our access to the payment market is limited may not be successful, which could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase our revenues and extend our global brand.

14

If government regulators determine that we are a systemically important payments system, we may have to change our settlement procedures or other operations, which could make it more costly to operate our business and reduce our operational flexibility.

Government regulators in the United States may determine that we are a systemically important payments system and impose settlement risk management requirements on us, including new settlement procedures or other operational rules to address credit and operational risks or new criteria for member participation and merchant access to our payments system. Increased regulatory focus in connection with the matters discussed above could make it more costly to operate our business.

Business Risks

We face intense competitive pressure on the fees we charge our customers, which may materially and adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

We generate revenue from fees we charge our customers that are based on payments volume or that are based on transaction messages processed and various other services we provide. In order to increase payments volume, enter new markets and expand our card base, we offer incentives to customers, such as upfront cash payments, fee discounts, credits, performance based growth incentives, marketing support payments and other support, such as marketing consulting and market research studies. Over the past several years, we have increased our use of incentives such as up front cash payments and fee discounts in many countries, including the United States. In order to stay competitive, we may have to continue to increase our use of incentives. Such pressure on fees may make the provision of certain products and services unprofitable and materially and adversely affect our operating revenue and profitability. To the extent that we continue to increase incentives to our customers, we will need to further increase payments volume or the amount of services we provide in order to benefit incrementally from such arrangements and to increase revenue and profit, and we may not be successful in doing so. In addition, we enter into long-term contracts with certain customers and continued pressure on fees could prevent us from entering into such agreements in the future on terms that we consider favorable, or may require us to modify existing agreements in order to maintain relationships. Increased pressure on fees also enhances the importance of cost containment and productivity initiatives in areas other than those relating to customer incentives, and we may not succeed in these efforts.

Our operating results may suffer because of intense competition worldwide in the global payments industry.

The global payments industry is highly competitive. Our payment programs compete against all forms of payment, including cash, checks and electronic transactions such as wire transfers and automated clearing house payments. In addition, our payment programs compete against the card-based payments systems of our competitors such as MasterCard, American Express, Discover and private-label cards issued by merchants.

Some of our competitors have developed, or may develop, substantially greater financial and other resources than we have, may offer a wider range of programs and services than we offer, may use more effective advertising and marketing strategies to achieve broader brand recognition or merchant acceptance than we have or may develop better security solutions or more favorable pricing arrangements. Our competitors may also introduce more innovative programs and services than ours.

Certain of our competitors, including American Express, Discover, private-label card networks and certain alternative payments systems, operate closed-loop payments systems with direct connections to both merchants and consumers, without involving intermediaries. These competitors seek to derive competitive advantages from their business models. For example, operators of closed-loop payments systems tend to have greater control over consumer and merchant customer service than operators of open-loop multi-party payments systems such as ours, in which we must rely on our issuing and acquiring financial institution customers. In addition, these competitors have not attracted the same level of legal or regulatory scrutiny of their pricing and business practices as have operators of open-loop multi-party payments systems such as ours.

15

We also expect that there may be changes in the competitive landscape in the future, including:

• Competitors, customers and other industry participants may develop products that compete with or replace value added services we currently provide to support our transaction processing. For example, in recent years some of our competitors and members have begun to compete with our currency conversion services by providing dynamic currency conversion services. Dynamic currency conversion is a service offered or facilitated by a merchant or processor that allows a cardholder to choose to have a transaction converted from the merchant’s currency into the cardholder’s billing currency at the point of sale in real time, thereby bypassing our currency conversion processes.

• Parties that process our transactions in certain countries may try to eliminate our position in the payments value chain. For example, merchants could process transactions directly with issuers, and processors could process transactions directly between issuers and acquirers.

• Participants in the payments industry may merge, create joint ventures or form other business combinations that may strengthen their existing business proposition or create new payment services that compete with our services. Strategic acquisitions could be easier for our public company competitors to effect because of their greater ability to finance acquisitions through the issuance of equity.

• Competition from alternative types of payment services, such as online payment services and other services that permit direct debit of consumer checking accounts or ACH payments, may increase.

If we are not able to compete effectively against any of the foregoing competitive threats, our revenue or profitability may decline.

Our operating revenue would decline significantly if we lose one or more of our largest customers, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.

A significant portion of our operating revenue is concentrated among our largest customers. Our pro forma operating revenues from our four largest members represented approximately $547.7 million, or 23%, and $870.9 million, or 22%, of our total pro forma operating revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively. In addition, our pro forma operating revenues from JPMorgan Chase accounted for $254.2 million, or 11%, and $408.5 million, or 10%, of our pro forma operating revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively. Most of our larger customer relationships are not exclusive and in certain circumstances may be terminated by our members. Our customers can reassess their commitments to us at any time in the future and/or develop their own competitive services. Loss of business from any of our largest customers could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Consolidation of the banking industry could result in our losing business and may create pressure on the fees we charge our customers, which may materially and adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

Over the last several years the banking industry has undergone substantial consolidation, and we expect this trend to continue in the future. Significant ongoing consolidation in the banking industry may result in a member financial institution with a substantial part of our portfolio being acquired by an institution that has a strong relationship with a competitor, resulting in a substantial loss of business. In addition, one or more of our customers could seek to merge with, or acquire, one of our competitors, and any such transaction could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

Continued consolidation in the banking industry would also reduce the overall number of our customers and potential customers and could increase the bargaining power of our remaining customers and potential customers. This consolidation could lead financial institutions to seek greater pricing discounts or other incentives with us. In addition, consolidations could prompt our existing customers to seek to renegotiate their pricing agreements with us to obtain more favorable terms. Pressure on the fees we charge our customers caused by such consolidation could materially and adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

16

Merchants are pursuing litigation and supporting regulatory proceedings relating to the costs associated with payment card acceptance and are negotiating incentive arrangements, including pricing discounts, all of which may increase our costs and materially and adversely affect our profitability.

We rely on merchants and their relationships with our customers to maintain and expand the acceptance of our payment cards. We believe that consolidation in the retail industry is producing a set of larger merchants that are having a significant impact on all participants in the global payments industry. For instance, some large merchants are bringing lawsuits against us with regard to, or advocating regulation of, interchange fees, which may represent a significant cost that merchants pay to accept payment cards. The emphasis merchants are placing on the costs associated with payment card acceptance may lead to additional litigation and regulation, which could impair our business.

We, along with our customers, negotiate pricing discounts and other incentive arrangements with certain large merchants to increase acceptance of our payment cards. If merchants continue to consolidate, our customers and we may have to increase the incentives provided to certain larger merchants, which could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

Certain financial institutions have exclusive, or near exclusive, relationships with our competitors to issue payment cards and these relationships may adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase our revenues.

Certain financial institutions have long-standing exclusive, or near exclusive, relationships with our competitors to issue payment cards, and these relationships may make it difficult or cost prohibitive for us to do material amounts of business with them in order to increase our revenues. In addition, these financial institutions may be more successful and may grow faster than the financial institutions that primarily issue our cards, which could put us at a competitive disadvantage.

We depend significantly on our relationships with our customers and other third parties to deliver services and manage our payments system. If we are unable to maintain those relationships, or if third parties on which we depend fail to deliver services on our behalf, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

We are, and will continue to be, significantly dependent on relationships with our customers and their relationships with cardholders and merchants to support our programs and services. We do not issue cards, extend credit to cardholders or determine the interest rates (if applicable) or other fees charged to cardholders using cards that carry our brands. Each issuer determines these and most other competitive card features. In addition, we do not generally solicit merchants to accept our cards and we do not establish the discount rates that merchants are charged for card acceptance, which are responsibilities of acquirers. As a result, the success of our business significantly depends on the continued success and competitiveness of our customers.

Outside of the United States and a select number of jurisdictions, most domestic (as opposed to cross-border) transactions conducted using our payment cards are authorized, cleared and settled by our customers or other processors without involving our central processing systems. Because we do not provide domestic transaction processing services in these countries, do not generally have direct relationships with merchants and never have direct relationships with cardholders, we depend on our close working relationships with our customers to effectively manage the processing of transactions involving our cards. Our inability to control the end-to-end processing on cards carrying our brands in many countries may put us at a competitive disadvantage by limiting our ability to ensure the quality of the services supporting our brand.

In addition, we depend on third parties to provide various services on our behalf and to the extent that any third party vendors fail to deliver services, our business and reputation could be impaired.

17

Global economic, political and other conditions may adversely affect trends in consumer spending and cross-border travel, which may materially and adversely impact our revenue and profitability.

The global payments industry depends heavily upon the overall level of consumer, business and government spending. For example, a sustained deterioration in general economic conditions, particularly in the Visa U.S.A. and Visa AP regions, where approximately 70% and 12%, respectively, of our pro forma revenue was generated for fiscal 2006, or increases in interest rates in key countries in which we operate, may adversely affect our financial performance by reducing the number or average purchase amount of transactions involving payment cards carrying our brands. A significant portion of the revenue we earn outside the United States results from cross-border business and leisure travel, which may be adversely affected by world geopolitical, economic and other conditions, including the threat of terrorism and outbreak of diseases such as SARS and avian flu. In particular, revenue from processing foreign currency transactions for our members fluctuates with cross-border travel and our members’ need for transactions to be converted into their base currency. In addition, as we are principally domiciled in the United States, a negative perception of the United States could impact the perception of our company, which could adversely affect our business prospects and growth.

Visa Europe’s payments system operations are becoming increasingly independent from ours and if we are unable to maintain seamless interaction of our respective systems, our business and the global perception of the Visa brand could be impaired.

Visa Europe currently has a regionally controlled processing platform. In June 2006, Visa Europe began operating an authorization system that is separate from ours and Visa Europe plans to begin operating a transaction processing and settlement system that is separate from ours. Because Visa Inc. and Visa Europe have independent processing platforms, interoperability must be maintained. Visa Europe’s authorization system has experienced interruptions in service, and it could do so in the future. To the extent that system disruptions occur, it can affect our cardholders who are traveling in Visa Europe’s region and can impair our reputation. The increasingly independent payments system operations of Visa Europe could present certain challenges to our business because differences between the two processing systems may make it more difficult to maintain the interoperability of our respective systems. In addition, under the framework agreement we are restricted from requiring Visa Europe to implement certain changes that we may deem important unless we agree to pay for the implementation costs. Any of the foregoing could result in a loss of payments volume or of members or could materially increase our costs.

As a guarantor of certain obligations of our members, we are exposed to risk of loss or insolvency if any of our members fail to fund their settlement obligations.

We indemnify our members for any loss suffered due to the failure of a member to fund its daily settlement obligations because of technical problems, liquidity shortfall, insolvency or other reasons. In certain instances, we indemnify members even in situations in which a transaction is not processed by our system.

While we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to cover a settlement failure by any of our largest members, concurrent settlement failures of more than one of our largest members or several of our smaller members, or systemic operational failures that last for more than a single day, may exceed our available resources and could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition. In addition, even if we have sufficient liquidity to cover a settlement failure, we may not be able to recover the amount of such a payment and may therefore be exposed to significant losses, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

Some of our members are composed of groups of financial institutions. Some of these members have elected to limit their responsibility for settlement losses arising from the failure of their constituent financial institutions in exchange for managing their constituent financial institutions in accordance with our credit risk policy. To the extent that any settlement failure resulting from a constituent financial institution exceeds the limits established by our credit risk policy, we would have to absorb the cost of such settlement failure, which could materially and adversely affect our cash flow.

18

If our transaction processing systems are disrupted or we are unable to process transactions efficiently, our revenue or profitability could be materially reduced.

Our transaction processing systems may experience service interruptions or degradation as a result of processing or other technology malfunction, fire, natural disasters, power loss, disruptions in long distance or local telecommunications access, fraud, terrorism or accident. Our visibility in the global payments industry may attract terrorists and hackers to conduct physical or computer-based attacks, leading to an interruption in service, increased costs or the compromise of data security. Additionally, we rely on service providers for the timely transmission of information across our global data network. If a service provider fails to provide the communications capacity or services we require, as a result of natural disaster, operational disruption, terrorism or any other reason, the failure could interrupt our services, adversely affect the perception of our brands’ reliability and materially reduce our revenue or profitability.

If we are not able to keep pace with the rapid technological developments in our industry to provide members, merchants and cardholders with new and innovative payment programs and services, the use of our cards could decline, which would reduce our revenue and income.

The payment card industry is subject to rapid and significant technological changes, including continuing developments of technologies in the areas of smart cards, radio frequency and proximity payment devices (such as contactless cards), e-commerce and mobile commerce, among others. We cannot predict the effect of technological changes on our business. We rely in part on third parties, including some of our competitors and potential competitors, for the development of and access to new technologies. We expect that new services and technologies applicable to the payments industry will continue to emerge, and these new services and technologies may be superior to, or render obsolete, the technologies we currently use in our card programs and services. In addition, our ability to adopt new services and technologies that we develop may be inhibited by a need for industry-wide standards, by resistance from members or merchants to such changes or by intellectual property rights of third parties. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to develop or adapt to technological changes and evolving industry standards.

Account data breaches involving card data stored by us or third parties could adversely affect our reputation and revenue.

We and our customers, merchants, and other third parties store cardholder account information in connection with our payment cards. In addition, our customers may use third-party processors to process transactions generated by cards carrying our brands. Breach of the systems on which sensitive cardholder data and account information are stored could lead to fraudulent activity involving our cards, damage the reputation of our brands and lead to claims against us. For example, in January 2007, TJX Companies, Inc., a large retailer with stores in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, disclosed a significant security breach in connection with card and account information, which exposed tens of millions of payment network cards issued under our brands and our competitors’ brands to fraudulent use. If we are sued in connection with any data security breach, we could be involved in protracted litigation. If unsuccessful in defending such lawsuits, we may be forced to pay damages and/or change our business practices or pricing structure, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability. In addition, any damage to our reputation or our brands resulting from an account data breach at one of our customers or merchants or other third parties could decrease the use and acceptance of our cards, which could have a material adverse impact on our payments volume, revenue and future growth prospects. Finally, any data security breach could result in additional regulation, which could materially increase our costs.

An increase in fraudulent and other illegal activity involving our cards could lead to reputational damage to our brands and could reduce the use and acceptance of our cards.

Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to capture cardholder account information to engage in illegal activities such as fraud and identity theft. As outsourcing and specialization become a more acceptable way of doing business in the payments industry, there are more third parties involved in processing transactions

19

using our cards. If fraud levels involving our cards were to rise, it could lead to reputational damage to our brands, which could reduce the use and acceptance of our cards, or to greater regulation, which could increase our compliance costs.

Adverse currency fluctuations could decrease revenues and increase expenses.

We conduct business globally in many foreign currencies, but report our financial results in U.S. dollars. We are therefore exposed to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates because depreciation of non-U.S. currencies against the U.S. dollar reduces the U.S. dollar value of the non-U.S. dollar denominated revenue that we recognize and appreciation of non-U.S. currencies against the U.S. dollar increases the U.S. dollar value of expenses that we incur that are denominated in those foreign currencies. We enter into foreign currency hedging contracts to reduce the effect of adverse changes in the value of a limited number of foreign currencies and for a limited period of time (typically up to one year).

Some of our financial incentives to customers are recorded using estimates of our customers’ performance. Material changes in our customers’ performance compared to our estimates could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

In certain instances, we offer our customers financial incentives, which are typically tied to their payments volume or messages processed, often under particular programs. These financial incentives are typically recorded as a reduction of revenue. We typically make estimates of our customers’ performance under these programs (sometimes over several years) in order to derive our estimates of the financial incentives that we will pay them. The reduction of revenue that we record each quarter is based on these estimates. Material changes in our customers’ performance compared to estimates could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

We have significant contingent liabilities for settlement payment of all issued and outstanding travelers cheques.

As of March 31, 2007, we had over $1 billion in contingent liabilities for settlement payment of all issued and outstanding travelers cheques. Approximately 30% of these travelers cheques were issued outside of the United States by a single issuer. While these obligations are supported in part by a bank guarantee, if the issuer were to fail to pay, we would be obligated to fund partial settlement of presented travelers cheques.

Our brand and reputation are key assets of our business and may be affected by how we are perceived in the marketplace.

Our brand and its attributes are key assets of our business. Our ability to attract and retain consumer cardholders and corporate clients is highly dependent upon the external perceptions of our company and our industry. Our business may be affected by actions taken by our customers that impact the perception of our brand. From time to time, our customers may take actions that we do not believe to be in the best interests of our brand, such as creditor practices that may be viewed as “predatory,” which may materially and adversely impact our business. Adverse developments with respect to our industry may also, by association, impair our reputation, or result in greater regulatory or legislative scrutiny.

Risks Related to the Restructuring

Our retrospective responsibility plan depends, in part, on the timely completion of an initial public offering, and if we are unable to close such a transaction in a timely manner, or if the retrospective responsibility plan is insufficient, we may have insufficient funds to pay settlements or judgments relating to such litigation, which could materially negatively affect our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

Visa U.S.A. and Visa International are currently involved in the litigation described under the heading “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Covered Litigation.” Plaintiffs in these litigation matters have alleged substantial damages. We refer to our plan to address liabilities that may arise in the covered

20

litigation as our retrospective responsibility plan. Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Inc. expect to enter into a loss sharing agreement, which would become effective upon the closing of the restructuring, and a judgment sharing agreement, which would become effective upon signing, with certain of its members, which provide that these members will be responsible for their proportionate share of the liabilities associated with the covered litigation. However, the loss sharing agreement provides that if we do not timely pursue and consummate an initial public offering, including having completed an initial public offering within 240 days after completion of the restructuring, the members’ obligations under the loss sharing agreement may be suspended until we have completed an initial public offering, at which point such obligations will be reinstated in full as if they had never been suspended. This 240-day period may be extended under certain circumstances. In addition, this agreement provides that the signing banks are responsible only for a proportionate amount of the liability in respect of the covered litigation equal to their membership proportion, as calculated in accordance with Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation. Because not all of Visa U.S.A.’s members will sign the loss sharing agreement, until the funding of the escrow account described below, we would also need to rely upon those members’ indemnification obligations contained in Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and as agreed in their membership agreements to recover the remaining portion of any liability from Visa U.S.A.’s members.

Upon the completion of an initial public offering of our common stock, we will deposit a portion of the proceeds of the offering, in an amount determined by the litigation committee, in an escrow account from which settlements or judgments in the covered litigation would be paid. In addition, the shares of class B common stock that are held by members of Visa U.S.A. following the restructuring will be subject to dilution as a result of any follow-on offerings of our class A shares, the proceeds of which are used to fund additional amounts into the escrow account necessary to resolve the covered litigation. However, the amount in the escrow account, including any additional amounts deposited in the escrow account from the proceeds of any subsequent offerings, may not be sufficient to satisfy all liabilities with respect to the covered litigation.

It may be difficult for us to fund settlement of any of the covered litigation prior to the completion of our planned initial public offering because we plan to use the escrow account as our primary source of funds for the payment of any potential losses arising from the covered litigation. In addition, if there were a final judgment against us in connection with the covered litigation or if we were to incur a judgment sharing obligation in a covered litigation before our initial public offering, we would have to rely upon the loss sharing agreement, which only indemnifies us for a portion of the liability with respect to the covered litigation that is equal to the aggregate membership proportion of the Visa U.S.A. members that sign the loss sharing agreement, as calculated in accordance with Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation, and we would have to seek indemnification from Visa U.S.A.’s remaining members pursuant to Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and as agreed in their membership agreements. To the extent we are unable to secure indemnification from our members, any portion of such a judgment not covered by our judgment sharing agreements would have to be paid by us and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Our retrospective responsibility plan depends on several related mechanisms to address potential liabilities arising from the covered litigation, some of which are unique and complex, and if we are prevented from using one or more of these mechanisms, it may be difficult for us to fund the payment of a settlement or final judgment against us, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Our retrospective responsibility plan is intended to address potential liabilities arising from the litigations described under the heading “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Covered Litigation.” Our retrospective responsibility plan consists of several related mechanisms to fund a final judgment or settlement in connection with the covered litigation, including an escrow account funded with a portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering and potential follow-on offerings of our common stock, a loss sharing agreement, judgment sharing agreements and the indemnification obligation of Visa U.S.A. members pursuant to Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements. These mechanisms and combinations of mechanisms are unique and complex. If we are prevented from using

21

one or more of these mechanisms under our retrospective responsibility plan, we could have difficulty funding the payment of a settlement or final judgment against us, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Our governance structure after the restructuring could have a material adverse effect on our business relationships with our members.

A number of our key members currently have officers who also serve on the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada or the regional boards of directors of our unincorporated regions of Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA, which we refer to collectively, with the boards of directors of Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, as our regional boards of directors or our regional boards. The historical practice has been to submit all material decisions regarding interregional issues for approval of each of our regional boards of directors prior to submitting these issues to the Visa International board of directors for approval. After the consummation of the restructuring, material decisions will be made by the Visa Inc. board of directors. The regional boards of directors of the unincorporated regions will be eliminated, and the boards of directors of Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada will be comprised of management and be largely administrative in nature. In addition, directors who are elected by our members are expected to comprise a minority of our board of directors. Thus, the role of member-nominated and member-elected directors in our corporate governance will be reduced after the closing of the restructuring. These changes could have a detrimental effect on our business relationships with members associated with a particular region. In addition, if a member that currently has an officer who also serves on one of the regional boards of directors will not have an officer who also serves on our board of directors after the restructuring, our business relationship with that member could suffer. A significant loss of revenue or payments volume attributable to such members could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Following the restructuring, our relationship with Visa Europe will be governed by our framework agreement. This agreement gives Visa Europe very broad rights to operate the Visa business in Visa Europe’s region, and we have limited ability to control their operations and limited recourse in the event of a breach by Visa Europe.

Historically, Visa Europe has been subject to the same global operating rules as Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada. These global operating rules regulate, among other things, interoperability of payment processing, brand maintenance and investment, standards for products and services, risk management, disputes between members and acceptance standards for merchants. After the restructuring, Visa Europe, unlike Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, will not become our subsidiary, but will instead remain a separate legal entity, and will no longer be subject to the same global operating rules as our subsidiaries and members. Our relationship with Visa Europe after the closing of the restructuring will be governed by a framework agreement and a subset of operating rules that we have agreed to with Visa Europe and that we have a limited ability to change in the future. Although the agreement will seek to ensure that Visa Europe operates in a manner that is acceptable to us, the contractual arrangement is untested and may not be effective in achieving this result. We have no audit rights, and thus have limited ability to monitor their performance. The agreement provides Visa Europe with very broad latitude to operate the Visa business and use our brands and technology within Visa Europe’s region and provides us limited controls over the operation of the Visa business in their region. Visa Europe is not required to spend any minimum amount promoting and building the Visa brand in its region. Visa Europe may develop, among other things, new brands, payment processing characteristics, products, services, risk management standards, processes for resolving disputes among members or merchant acceptance profiles that are inconsistent with the global operating rules that we apply within the territory in which we operate. If we want to change a global rule or require Visa Europe to implement certain changes that would not have a positive return for Visa Europe and its members, then Visa Europe is not required to implement such rule or change unless we agree to pay for the implementation costs and expenses that Visa Europe and its members will incur as a consequence of the implementation to the extent necessary to return Visa Europe and its members to a neutral financial condition. We cannot terminate the framework agreement even in the event of Visa Europe’s material uncured breach, and we can only exercise our call right to purchase Visa Europe under severe conditions. Our

22

remedies under this agreement, if Visa Europe fails to meet its obligations, are limited. Our inability to terminate and other features of the licenses granted under the agreement may also raise issues concerning the characterization of the licenses for purposes of determining our tax treatment with respect to entering into the licenses and receiving payments thereunder. Any inconsistency in the payment processing, services and products that we are able to provide could negatively affect cardholders from Visa Europe using cards in our regions or our cardholders using cards in Visa Europe’s region.

Our framework agreement with Visa Europe requires us to indemnify Visa Europe for losses resulting from any claims brought outside of Visa Europe’s region arising from either party’s activities that relate to our payments business or the payments business of Visa Europe, and this indemnification obligation could expose us to significant liabilities.

Under our framework agreement with Visa Europe, we are required to indemnify Visa Europe for losses resulting from any claims in the United States or anywhere else outside of Visa Europe’s region arising from our or their activities that relate to our payments business or the payments business of Visa Europe. This obligation applies whether or not we or any of our related parties or agents participated in the actions that gave rise to such claims. Such an obligation could expose us to significant losses for activities over which we have little or no control.

We have granted to Visa Europe the right to require us to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Visa Europe’s capital stock. If Visa Europe exercises this option, we could incur a substantial financial liability and face operational challenges in integrating Visa Europe into our business.

Contemporaneously with, and as a condition to, the closing of the restructuring, we will enter into a put-call option agreement with Visa Europe. Under the put-call option agreement, we will grant Visa Europe a put right under which we will be required to purchase all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Visa Europe from the members of Visa Europe. Under the put-call option agreement, Visa Europe may exercise the put option at any time following the date that is the earlier of: (i) 365 days after the completion of an initial public offering of our common stock; and (ii) 605 days after the completion of the restructuring. The purchase price of the Visa Europe shares under the put option is based upon a formula that is based upon, among other things, Visa Europe’s projected sustainable twelve month adjusted net operating income and the forward P/E multiple applicable to Visa Inc. common stock at the time the option is exercised, subject to certain adjustments. Upon exercise of the put option, we will be obligated, subject only to regulatory issues and other limited conditions, to pay the purchase price within 285 days in cash or, under certain circumstances, with a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. We must pay the purchase price in cash, however, if the settlement of the put option occurs more than three years after the completion of the restructuring. The portion of the purchase price we will be able to pay in stock will be limited to a percentage equal to that percentage of our class C common stock received by stockholders (other than Visa Europe) that remains subject to transfer restrictions set out in Visa Inc.’s certificate of incorporation.

In the event that Visa Europe exercises the put option, we will incur a substantial financial obligation. If we are unable to pay the purchase price for the Visa Europe shares with available cash on hand, we will need to obtain third-party financing, either by borrowing funds or undertaking a subsequent equity offering. This financing may not be available to us in a sufficient amount within the required 285-day period, or on terms that we deem to be reasonable. Any subsequent equity offering required to satisfy this obligation would dilute the ownership interests of our stockholders. Moreover, the acquisition of Visa Europe following an exercise of the put option would require us to integrate the operations of Visa Europe into our business, which could divert the time and attention of senior management.

Upon entering into the put-call agreement, we will be required to record the put option at its fair value in our consolidated balance sheet. (See “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information” on page 109 for an estimate of the initial impact to our unaudited condensed combined pro forma balance sheet had we entered into

23

this agreement on March 31, 2007, including a full description of the methodology and assumptions used in the computation of this pro forma amount.) Going forward, we will be required to record any changes in the fair value of the put option on a quarterly basis. These adjustments will also be recorded through our consolidated statement of operations, which will therefore impact our reported net income and net income per share. Such quarterly adjustments and their resulting impact on our reported statement of operations could be significant. The existence of these charges could adversely affect our ability to raise capital, including through our planned initial public offering, and/or the price at which we can raise capital.

For more information on the put-call option agreement, see “Material Contracts—The Put-Call Option Agreement.”

Our management team will be new and will not have had a history of working together.

We designated Joseph Saunders as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board in May 2007 and will be assembling a new management team. Our success will largely depend on the ability of the new management team to work together to implement the proposed restructuring plan, to integrate the operations and business of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada and to continue to execute our business strategy. Because these people will not have had a history of working together and may be recruited from outside our company, our management team may not be able to work together effectively, which could disrupt our operations and harm our business.

The restructuring is expensive and will require us to make significant changes to our culture and business operations and if we fail to make this transition successfully, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We have incurred and expect to incur substantial costs in connection with legal, accounting and other advisory fees related to the proposed restructuring. In addition, the proposed restructuring requires a broad and significant change to our culture and operations. The primary goal of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada has not been to maximize profit for these entities, but has been to deliver benefits to their members and enhance member opportunity and revenue. After the completion of the restructuring, we will need to operate our business as a for-profit corporation, in a way that maximizes long term stockholder value. Many members of our management team have limited experience operating a for-profit business. Consequently, this transition will be subject to risks, expenses and difficulties that we cannot predict and may not be capable of handling in an efficient manner.

In addition, the Visa enterprise is currently operated under a decentralized regional structure, and each region has much autonomy in its own business strategies and decisions. Our proposed restructuring will result in a more centralized corporate governance structure in which our board of directors will exert centralized management control. This change will require substantial changes to our internal culture given our history of operating in a decentralized manner with substantial regional autonomy. We may not be able to retain and attract key employees. We may not be able to make this cultural and organizational change in an efficient and timely manner, and we may not realize the cost savings and operational efficiencies that we currently expect.

There is no existing market for our regional classes of common stock or for class B common stock and class C common stock into which the regional classes of common stock will be converted prior to our planned initial public offering, and thus we do not expect these shares to provide you with liquidity.

There is currently no existing market for our regional classes of common stock or our class B common stock and class C common stock into which our regional classes of common stock will convert prior to our planned initial public offering, and we do not anticipate that any of these shares will be listed on any securities exchange or quoted on any automated quotation systems or electronic communications network.

24

Our regional classes of common stock, our class B common stock and our class C common stock will be subject to significant restrictions on transfer and ownership.

The regional classes of our common stock that will be issued upon the closing of the restructuring, and our class B common stock and class C common stock into which our regional classes of common stock will be converted prior to our planned initial public offering, will each be subject to significant ownership and transfer restrictions. For example, subject to limited exceptions, shares of our class B common stock may not be transferred until the later of three years from the date of an initial public offering or the period of time necessary to resolve the covered litigation. All other regional classes of our common stock and our class C common stock may not be transferred, subject to limited exceptions, until the third anniversary of the date of an initial public offering. During such periods, except for limited exceptions, holders of our regional classes of common stock, and our class B common stock and class C common stock will not be able to transfer such stock to any person or entity other than affiliates of the holder or to holders of common stock of the same class of common stock.

The voting power represented by shares of our common stock may be limited because ownership of a significant percentage of our common stock will be concentrated in a few of our largest members.

Upon completion of the restructuring, we expect that our four largest stockholders will own about 25% of our outstanding common stock. This concentration of voting power could result in these stockholders having the ability to block stockholder action that you may deem favorable.

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service may treat a portion of our common stock received by a member of Visa International or Visa U.S.A. as taxable income.

Based on the opinion of our special tax counsel, we believe that, subject to the assumptions, qualifications, and limitations set forth in “United States Federal Income Tax Considerations,” we, the members of Visa International and the members of Visa U.S.A. will not recognize any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the restructuring and the true-up, except that, as to a portion of any Visa Inc. stock received in connection with the true-up, a stockholder of Visa Inc. may recognize imputed interest income. If a stockholder is not a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Visa Inc. may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% of the imputed interest or, if applicable, at a lower treaty rate.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the opinion of our special tax counsel does not apply to the extent that the fair market value of Visa Inc. common stock received by a member of Visa International or by a member of Visa U.S.A. pursuant to the restructuring and the true-up (whether received on the date of closing of the restructuring or thereafter) is different from the fair market value of such member’s equity interest in Visa International or Visa U.S.A., as the case may be, immediately before the commencement of the restructuring. Our special tax counsel is unable to opine as to such difference because, in transactions similar to the restructuring and the true-up, treatment as an exchange described in Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally applies only to the extent that a taxpayer transfers property to a corporation in exchange for stock having the same fair market value. The IRS might therefore take the position that the difference (whether received on the date of closing of the restructuring or thereafter), in the case of an excess of value received over value surrendered, should not be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as having been received in exchange for property. As a result, a member of Visa International or a member of Visa U.S.A. could be required to recognize income, but only to the extent of the excess or shortfall of value received over value surrendered. For more information, see “United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

The IRS could challenge our characterization of the restructuring and the true-up and determine that it involves taxable transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and we may face adverse tax consequences as a result of the restructuring, the true-up or our other contemplated transactions.

We have not requested that the IRS issue a ruling on the restructuring and the true-up. There can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge our characterization of the restructuring and the true-up and assert that it is taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

25

Members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, as well as any state, local or non-U.S., tax consequences to them of the restructuring and the true-up. For more information, see “United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

In addition, at some point after the closing of the restructuring, the company’s status for certain state income tax purposes may change. This change in status may affect the deductibility of certain expenses, including litigation related items.

Members may incur tax liabilities in jurisdictions outside the United States, as well as in United States state and local jurisdictions, in connection with the restructuring and the true-up.

Members of Visa International, Visa Europe, Visa Canada and Visa U.S.A. may be required to recognize a gain or loss in connection with the restructuring and the true-up in jurisdictions outside the United States, as well as in United States state and local jurisdictions. Members should consult their local tax advisors regarding the potential non-U.S. tax consequences, as well as the potential United States state and local tax consequences, of the restructuring and the true-up.

The restructuring will facilitate future strategic transactions, such as our planned initial public offering, which will dilute the interest held by our members.

As a result of the restructuring, we will be better positioned to engage in future capital raising activities and strategic transactions such as acquisitions. Transactions of this type would likely involve issuing or selling our equity interests to non-members. In addition, certain aspects of our retrospective responsibility plan depend upon an initial public offering, and we currently intend to commence planning for an initial public offering after the closing of the restructuring. Our certificate of incorporation provides that class A common stock may be issued to non-members, subject only to approval of our board of directors. Thus, if we implement an initial public offering as currently planned, our members’ interest in our company will be diluted.

The consideration that will initially be issued to members of Visa International upon the closing of the restructuring is subject to reallocation and conversion.

The restructuring agreement provides that each of the regional classes of common stock issued upon the closing of the restructuring will automatically convert into shares of class B common stock (in the case of class USA common stock) or class C common stock (in the case of class EU common stock, class Canada common stock, class AP common stock, class LAC common stock and class CEMEA common stock) in connection with the true-up process. As a result of these conversions, members from Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and our unincorporated regions may ultimately receive a greater or lesser number of shares than their initial allocation, depending on the relative performance of their region vis-à-vis the other regions. Thus, if a region’s net revenue performance (as measured by its variance from agreed upon projections and potentially further adjusted for its variance from agreed upon marketing expense projections) during the twelve months prior to the true-up calculation is worse than one or more other regions’ net revenue performance (similarly measured), its members may be entitled to fewer shares upon such conversion and reallocation than at the closing of the restructuring. In addition, because the true-up calculation is based on relative financial performance among the regions, it is possible that a region could meet or exceed its net revenue goals and be allocated fewer shares as a result of the true-up if other regions were to outperform their revenue targets by a greater percentage. In addition, the allocation of shares among the financial institutions that are members of the Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA regions are also subject to a separate true-up based on the relative performance (based on net fees and total volumes during the relevant measuring period) of each financial institution within the Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA regions, respectively, as compared with the financial performance of all of the other financial institutions within its respective region during the measurement period. Thus, members of the unincorporated regions may receive fewer shares as a result of the true-up process if other financial institutions in

26

their respective region outperform them during the specified period. For a discussion of the share allocation and true up process, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring—True-Up of Merger Consideration” and “—Equity Allocation to Members in the Unincorporated Regions and Subsequent Adjustment.”

Anti-takeover provisions in our governing documents and Delaware law could delay or prevent entirely a takeover attempt or a change in control.

Provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law could delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that our stockholders consider favorable. Except for limited exceptions, no person may own more than 15% of our total outstanding shares on an as converted basis or more than 15% of any class or series of our common stock, unless our board of directors approves the acquisition of such shares. In addition, except for shares of common stock issued to a member in connection with the restructuring, or shares issuable on conversion of such shares, shares held by a member or similar person (a competitor or affiliate or member of a competitor) may not exceed 5% of any class of common stock. In addition:

• our board of directors will be divided into three classes, with approximately one-third of our directors elected each year;

• until the closing of our initial public offering, seven directors will be elected by the former members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe, and from and after the closing of our initial public offering until the third anniversary of our initial public offering, six directors will be regional directors from the former unincorporated regions of Visa International and from Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada;

• any representative of one of our competitors will be disqualified from service on our board of directors;

• our directors, other than the directors elected by the holders of our class B common stock and class C common stock (who may be removed by the holders of the class and series of common stock electing them), may be removed only upon the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the voting power of all the shares of stock then entitled to vote at an election of directors, voting together as a single class;

• our stockholders are not entitled to the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors;

• holders of our class A common stock are not entitled to act by written consent;

• our stockholders must provide timely notice for any stockholder proposals and director nominations;

• we have adopted provisions that eliminate the personal liability of directors for monetary damages for actions taken as a director or member, with certain exceptions;

• a vote of 80% or more of all of the outstanding shares of our stock then entitled to vote is required to amend certain sections of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and for stockholders to amend any provision of our bylaws; and

• we will be governed by Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or DGCL, as amended from time to time, which provides that a corporation shall not engage in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years following the time that such stockholder became an interested stockholder, except under certain circumstances including upon receipt of prior board approval.

For a discussion of anti-takeover provisions in our charter, see “Description of Capital Stock of Visa Inc.—Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation” and “—Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute.”

27

U.S. federal and state banking regulations may impact our members’ ownership of our common stock.

Federal and state banking laws and regulations in the United States govern, among other things, the types of equity investments that regulated institutions are permitted to make. Members that are subject to regulation by any of the federal or state bank or other financial institution regulatory agencies should consult their own advisors regarding any notice or application that is required to be made, or any consent that is required to be obtained, from any applicable federal or state regulatory agency regarding the common stock they receive in the restructuring. Members that are federal savings associations should also consult their own advisors regarding the application of certain Office of Thrift Supervision rules that limit “pass through investments” to a percentage of an institution’s total capital. In addition, we expect that federal or state-chartered credit unions may be required to seek the advice of their relevant federal and state regulators in connection with the receipt and holding of our common stock. Failure to provide proper notice or make appropriate application to, or receive approval from, the relevant federal and state regulators, if necessary, could result in any of a wide range of formal or informal enforcement actions or administrative measures by such regulators.

28

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement-prospectus, including the annexes and exhibits hereto, contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may include statements regarding the period following the completion of the restructuring. The safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 24A of the Securities Act do not apply to the forward-looking statements that are made in this proxy statement–prospectus.

These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations or projections about our business, operations, industry, financial condition and liquidity. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will” and variations thereof or words and terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance or the restructuring of our business, identify forward-looking statements. You should note that the discussion of Visa International’s, Visa U.S.A.’s, Visa Canada’s and Visa Europe’s reasons for the restructuring and the description of the financial advisors’ opinions, as well as other portions of this proxy statement-prospectus, contain many forward-looking statements that describe beliefs, assumptions and estimates as of the indicated dates and those forward-looking expectations may have changed as of the date of this proxy statement-prospectus. In addition, any underlying assumptions are forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict or quantify. Therefore, actual results could differ materially and adversely from these forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this proxy statement-prospectus.

We list below the principal factors we believe are important to our business and the restructuring that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations. We caution you that although these factors are important, this list should not be considered as exhaustive or as an admission regarding the adequacy of disclosure and that you should read carefully the factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of this proxy statement-prospectus:

• increased legal and regulatory scrutiny of interchange fees;

• the outcome of the merchant interchange multidistrict litigation against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International;

• the outcome of litigations brought against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International by American Express and Discover;

• approval of the settlement of Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa International’s currency conversion litigations and the outcome of various lawsuits relating to Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa International’s currency conversion practices;

• limitations on our business resulting from litigation or litigation settlements;

• increased global regulatory scrutiny of the payments industry;

• existing and proposed regulation in the areas of consumer privacy and data use and security;

• actions of foreign governments that may prevent us from effectively competing in certain domestic payment markets;

• intense competitive pressure on the fees we charge our members;

• intense competition in the global payments industry;

• consolidation in the banking and retail industries;

• our relationships with our customer financial institutions;

• global economic and political conditions;

29

• interoperability between our payments system operations and Visa Europe’s payments system operations;

• our guarantee of the settlement obligations of our principal members;

• potential disruptions of our transaction processing system;

• technological developments in the global payment card industry;

• effectiveness of our payments system’s security;

• fraudulent or other illegal activities involving payments cards carrying our brands;

• currency fluctuations;

• estimates involved in recording member incentives in our financial results;

• the reputation of our brand, our business and the global payments industry;

• changes in our corporate governance structure after the restructuring that may reduce the influence of our financial institution members;

• the sufficiency of our retrospective liability plan, which depends in part, on the timely completion of an initial public offering of our common stock after the restructuring;

• our contractual relationship with Visa Europe after the restructuring;

• Visa Europe’s right to indemnification for claims brought against Visa Europe outside of its region;

• Visa Europe’s right to require us to purchase all of the issued shares of capital stock of Visa Europe;

• the ability of our new management team to successfully work together;

• changes to our business culture and operations after the restructuring;

• lack of an existing market for our regional class B and class C common stock;

• significant restrictions on transfer and ownership that apply to our regional class B and class C common stock;

• concentration of ownership of our common stock in a few of our largest members;

• the ultimate allocation of shares of our common stock to our members under the true-up process;

• our characterization of the restructuring and the true-up for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

• restrictions on a change of control contained in our organizational documents and applicable law; and

• the impact of U.S. banking regulations on our members’ ownership of our common stock.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning the restructuring or other matters addressed in this proxy statement-prospectus and attributable to Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada, Visa Europe or Visa Inc. or any person acting on any such company’s behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements referred to in this section. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, none of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada or Visa Inc. undertakes any obligation to release publicly any revision to such forward-looking statements.

30

THE PROXY SOLICITATION

Matters to be Considered

This proxy statement-prospectus is furnished to members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. in connection with the solicitation by the boards of directors of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. of the adoption and approval by their respective members of the restructuring proposal and the equity incentive plan proposal. The Visa International and Visa U.S.A. boards of directors recommend that the restructuring proposal and the equity incentive plan proposal be approved.

The Restructuring Proposal

Members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. are being asked to adopt and approve the restructuring agreement and each of the transactions contemplated by the restructuring agreement, including:

• The amendments to the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Visa U.S.A. in order to separate the voting and economic rights of members of Visa U.S.A. from members’ commercial and other rights and obligations as members of Visa U.S.A. with regard to participation in the Visa payments system;

• The merger of VI merger sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of VI LLC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa International, into Visa International, in the Visa International merger;

• The reallocation of all of the limited liability company interests in VI LLC to separate the limited liability company interests into six classes, corresponding to the five geographic Visa regions (after the surrender of Visa Canada’s interest as described above), and the allocation of the limited liability company interests to individual members of VI LLC in accordance with each member’s regional affiliation and the respective ownership percentages as contemplated by the restructuring agreement;

• The merger of VI LLC into Visa Inc. in the VI LLC merger; and

• The merger of a non-stock corporation in which Visa Inc. is the sole member, and which we refer to as Visa U.S.A. merger sub, into Visa U.S.A. in the Visa U.S.A. merger.

Consummation of the restructuring is conditioned upon, among other things, receiving the consents of the respective members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. necessary to approve the restructuring, as well as approval of the members of Visa Canada.

The full text of the restructuring agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement-prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. For additional information, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement.”

The Equity Incentive Plan Proposal

In addition to the restructuring, you will be asked to consider and approve the equity incentive plan. The equity incentive plan would allow us to grant or award stock-based rights and awards to our non-employee directors, officers, employees and consultants.

Action by Written Consent

In lieu of a special meeting of Visa International or Visa U.S.A., action on the restructuring proposal and equity incentive plan proposal will be taken by written consent of the respective members of each entity. The restructuring is scheduled to be consummated on     , 2007, which is expected to be as soon as practicable after consents have been received and not revoked from members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. representing the requisite number of votes required to approve the restructuring and all other conditions to closing have been satisfied or waived, but which will not in any event be sooner than 30 days after the date of mailing of this proxy

31

statement-prospectus. If the equity incentive plan proposal receives the requisite member approval, the equity incentive plan will become effective immediately after the closing of the restructuring.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no consent by a member of Visa International will be effective to approve the restructuring proposal unless it is delivered within 60 days of the earliest dated consent to the restructuring proposal or equity incentive plan proposal delivered to Visa International. Similarly, no consent by a member of Visa U.S.A. will be effective to approve the restructuring proposal unless it is delivered within 60 days of the earliest dated consent to the restructuring proposal or equity incentive plan proposal, respectively, delivered to Visa U.S.A.

Record Date

Visa International and Visa U.S.A. have fixed the close of business on     , 2007 as the record date for determining which of their respective members are entitled to consent with respect to the restructuring proposal and to determine the members that will be asked to execute a proxy to authorize the execution of a written consent to approve the equity incentive plan proposal. Only members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A. on the record date are entitled to consent to the restructuring proposal and execute proxies to approve the equity incentive plan proposal. On the record date, there were approximately      members of Visa International and      members of Visa U.S.A. who will be entitled to submit consents and proxies.

As of the record date, no directors and executive officers of Visa International or Visa U.S.A. beneficially held membership interests in Visa International or Visa U.S.A.

Consent Required

The Restructuring Proposal

Visa International

In order for the restructuring proposal to be approved by the members of Visa International, consents must be received from members having a majority of the voting power held by all members that are entitled to elect the governing body of Visa International. The voting power represented by each consent is set forth on the accompanying form of proxy to consent and is out of a total of 4,541,757,020 votes that would be entitled to be cast on such proposal at a meeting of Visa International’s members. Specifically:

• each Principal and Visa Cash Program participant is entitled to one vote for each U.S. $1,000, or fraction thereof, of card sales volume and Visa Cash sales volume as reported in such member’s operating certificates for the calendar year ended December 31, 2006;

• each PLUS Issuer is entitled to one vote for every 25 PLUS Program Cards, except for cards that bear both Visa and PLUS Program marks, in existence at December 31, 2006; and

• each Cheque Issuer is entitled to one vote for each U.S. $1,000, or fraction thereof, of cheque sales volume, or its equivalent in such member’s currency, as set forth, in the Cheque Issuer’s operating certificates for the calendar year ended December 31, 2006.

The voting allocation in each case is subject to the operating certificates not being found inaccurate by the board of directors of Visa International.

Visa U.S.A.

Approval of the restructuring proposal by Visa U.S.A. members will require the consent of members holding a two-thirds majority of the voting power of members that would be entitled to vote on the proposal at a meeting of Visa U.S.A.’s members, which we refer to as Visa U.S.A. voting members. Acquirer members, administrative members, cheque issuer members, group members, associate members sponsored by a debit

32

interchange member and principal members of Visa U.S.A. in existence as of the relevant date of determination are voting members if such member had sales volume during the twelve months preceding March 31, 2007 and meets any of the following criteria:

• had its application accepted by Visa U.S.A. on or before February 10, 1992;

• is an affiliate, as defined in the Federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, of a member that had its application accepted by Visa U.S.A. on or before February 10, 1992; or

• had debit card sales volume, during the twelve months preceding March 31, 2007.

The Visa U.S.A. voting members are entitled to an aggregate of 100 million votes. Each Visa U.S.A. voting member is entitled to the number of votes equal to 100 million multiplied by the Visa U.S.A. voting member’s membership proportion, which number of votes is set forth on the accompanying consent. Membership proportion means, for each Visa U.S.A. voting member, an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing: (A) the total of all service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron Card accounts paid by such Visa U.S.A. voting member (or in the case of an associate member sponsored by a debit interchange member, paid on its behalf by its sponsoring debit interchange member) to Visa U.S.A. from the date of the Visa U.S.A. voting member’s acceptance as a member through January 15, 2006; by (B) the total of all service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron Card accounts paid to Visa U.S.A. by all Visa U.S.A. voting members (or in the case of an associate member sponsored by a debit interchange member, paid on its behalf by its sponsoring debit interchange member) from May 26, 1970 through January 15, 2006.

The Equity Incentive Plan Proposal

To approve the equity incentive plan for Visa Inc. we are seeking the approval of the members holding membership interests in Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, which, assuming the completion of the restructuring, would represent a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Visa Inc. immediately after the closing. We are also obtaining the approval of the equity incentive plan by Visa International, the sole stockholder of Visa Inc. prior to the restructuring.

Revocation of Consents

Any consent or proxy to consent given pursuant to this solicitation by a member of Visa International with respect to the restructuring proposal or equity incentive plan proposal being submitted for member approval may be revoked by the member giving it at any time before unrevoked consents from members representing the requisite number of votes required to approve the restructuring proposal or equity incentive plan proposal are delivered to Visa International, or in the case of the equity incentive plan proposal, before a written consent approving the equity incentive plan proposal is executed and delivered to Visa Inc. Consents may be revoked by filing a written notice of revocation with the Secretary of Visa International. Any such notice of revocation should be sent to the following address:

Visa International Service Association

P.O. Box 8999

San Francisco, CA 94128-8999

Attn: Thomas M’Guinness, Secretary

33

Any consent given pursuant to this solicitation by a member of Visa U.S.A. may be revoked by the member giving it at any time before unrevoked consents from members representing the requisite number of votes required to approve the restructuring proposal or equity incentive plan proposal are delivered to Visa U.S.A. Consents may be revoked by filing a written notice of revocation with the Secretary of Visa U.S.A. Any such notice of revocation should be sent to the following address:

Visa U.S.A. Inc.

P.O. Box 8999

San Francisco, CA 94128-8999

Attn: Joshua Floum, Secretary

Costs of Soliciting Consents; Additional Materials

The cost of the solicitation of consents from Visa International members will be paid by Visa International. The cost of the solicitation of consents from Visa U.S.A. members will be paid by Visa U.S.A. In addition to solicitation by mail, Visa International and Visa U.S.A. may solicit proxies to consent by telephone, telegram, e-mail, facsimile or through personal contacts. The extent to which this will be necessary depends entirely upon how promptly proxies to consent are returned.

Visa International and Visa U.S.A. have jointly retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies and to verify certain records related to the solicitation for a fee of $740,000 plus expenses. You are urged to send in your proxy without delay.

All copies of information materials will be furnished directly to members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and any member who desires additional copies of the solicitation materials for the purposes of review in connection with the decision to furnish a consent should write to:

Visa Inc.

P.O. Box 8999

San Francisco, CA 94128-8999

Attn: Visa Inc. Corporate Secretary

34

GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE VISA CANADA MEETING

General

Visa Canada management is delivering this proxy statement-prospectus as part of the information being made available to members of Visa Canada in connection with the general meeting.

The information provided herein is given as of     , 2007, unless otherwise specified.

Date, Time and Place of Meeting

The meeting will be held on     , 2007 at 12:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) at the offices of Visa Canada Inc., Suite 3710, Scotia Plaza, 40 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, unless otherwise adjourned or postponed.

Record Date

The record date for the determination of members/shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting is     , 2007.

Purpose of the General Meeting

At the general meeting, Visa Canada members/shareholders will be asked to consider, and if thought advisable, to pass, with or without amendment:

1. bylaw amendments;

2. applications for Supplementary Letters Patent;

3. a proposal to take steps to convert from a non-share capital corporation to an OBCA corporation;

4. a special resolution authorizing the amalgamation of Visa Canada and Visa Canada Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc., under sections 175 and 176 of the OBCA upon the terms and conditions set forth in the restructuring agreement;

5. a resolution approving the equity incentive plan; and

to transact such other business as may be properly brought before the meeting or any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof.

Voting

A Visa Canada member/shareholder may appoint a person to act as proxy holder, and provide voting instructions to that person.

The proxy holders named in the attached form of proxy are directors of Visa Canada. A Visa Canada member/shareholder may appoint another person to act as proxy holder.

Visa Canada members/shareholders that are unable to attend the meeting should complete, date, sign and return the enclosed form of proxy to:

Visa Canada Association

Suite 3710, Scotia Plaza

40 King Street West

Toronto Ontario, M5H 3Y2

Attn: Mitchell Wolfe

not later than 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time), on     , 2007, or if the meeting is adjourned, not less than 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time for holding the adjourned meeting.

35

Voting Instructions

On the form of proxy, each Visa Canada member/shareholder may indicate how the member/shareholder wants the proxy holder to vote, or the member/shareholder may let the proxy holder decide. If voting instructions are given, then proxy holders will vote in accordance with those instructions.

If no voting instructions are given, then proxy holders will vote as they see fit. If a member/shareholder appoints the proxy holders named on the attached form of proxy and does not specify how they should vote, then the proxy holder will vote “FOR” each of the resolutions under consideration.

Revocation of Proxies

A Visa Canada member/shareholder who has returned a form of proxy may revoke it by:

(i) completing and signing another form of proxy with a later date than the form of proxy that was previously returned and returning the later-dated form of proxy to the corporate secretary of Visa Canada; or

(ii) returning a written statement signed by the member/shareholder or member/shareholder’s attorney as authorized by the member/shareholder in writing:

(a) to the corporate secretary of Visa Canada, at any time up to and including     , 2007 or, if the meeting is adjourned or postponed, the not less than 48 hours (excluding Saturdays and holidays) before the time to which the meeting has been adjourned or postponed; or

(b) to the chairman of the meeting on the date of the meeting or any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) of the meeting, before the start of the meeting.

Members/Shareholders Entitled to Vote

As of     , 2007, the date of this proxy statement–prospectus, there were      members/shareholders of Visa Canada entitled to vote with an aggregate of      votes eligible to be cast at the meeting.

Principal Members/Shareholders

To the knowledge of the directors and officers of Visa Canada, the only members that, together with such member’s associates, as at     , 2007, beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control or direction over more than 10% of the votes attached to membership interests in Visa Canada are Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, which is entitled to 60,069,424 votes, Royal Bank of Canada, which is entitled to 47,275,459 votes, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank, which is entitled to 24,265,377 votes.

36

THE RESTRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS

Background to the Restructuring Transactions

The Visa Enterprise

The Visa enterprise consists of five primary corporate entities related by ownership and membership: Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe, Visa Canada and Inovant. The Visa enterprise operates in six geographic regions, Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe, Visa Canada and three regions that operate as divisions of Visa International: the Asia Pacific region, or Visa AP, the Latin America and Caribbean region, or Visa LAC, and the Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa region, or Visa CEMEA. All five corporate entities and the three unincorporated regions have their own boards of directors.

Inovant LLC, the owners of which are Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe, Visa International and Visa Canada, is responsible for operating the VisaNet transaction processing system and other related processing systems.

Visa International is a Delaware non-stock corporation, the members of which are Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe, Visa Canada and certain financial institutions and groups of such institutions, which we refer to as group members, in the Visa International unincorporated regions of Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA. The members of Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada are financial institutions within each respective geographic region.

Together, the six Visa regions have a long-standing relationship stemming from their joint ownership, governance, and continued investment in Visa International and Inovant. This relationship extends to their unified commitment to offer a seamless global service to the financial institution members, merchants and cardholders that participate in the Visa system worldwide.

Regional Evaluations

Throughout its recent history, the management and boards of directors of each of the Visa regions have engaged in strategic reviews that included the evaluation of business and structural opportunities. In addition, the Visa International board and Presidents’ Council, a committee consisting of the presidents of the five primary corporate entities and the presidents of the three unincorporated regions, have engaged in various discussions on how to improve the Visa business through increased global coordination and interoperability, joint investment and product development and prioritization of key business objectives, with the objective of enhancing the Visa enterprise’s global business and structure.

At the beginning of 2005, strategic reviews were in progress in four regions:

• Visa U.S.A. was engaged in an evaluation of its business model to explore operational, governance and ownership alternatives, including a potential initial public offering of Visa U.S.A.;

• Visa Canada was engaged in an evaluation of potential restructuring options for Visa Canada, including a potential initial public offering of Visa Canada;

• Visa AP was engaged in an evaluation of the implications of incorporating Visa AP; and

• Visa LAC was engaged in an evaluation of the implications of incorporating Visa LAC.

Each of these reviews shared the common fundamental objective of improving Visa operations within their respective regions for the benefit of the overall Visa enterprise.

Global Discussions Begin

This section describes the process by which each Visa region evaluated its individual alternatives before the regions reached a consensus that the proposed global restructuring would best position the overall Visa enterprise to succeed at both a global and regional level.

37

At its regular meeting held on April 5, 2005, the Visa International board of directors discussed the separate strategic reviews then being conducted by Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa AP. Visa International’s board decided that Visa International management would evaluate Visa International’s role as a global enterprise, taking into consideration the then-current direction of Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa AP.

At its regular meeting held on April 29, 2005, the Visa LAC board discussed the necessity of maintaining global coordination and the interoperability of the Visa payments system in the event of any structural change in any of the regions. The Visa LAC board determined that Visa International should be asked to work together with all of the regions to analyze options for operating the Visa enterprise as a single company before any region-specific structural changes were implemented. The Visa LAC board also directed the region’s management to explore the financial and legal implications of separately incorporating Visa LAC.

At its regular meeting held on May 31, 2005, the Visa International board of directors decided that Visa International would coordinate the restructuring efforts across the regions. At the suggestion of directors from Visa LAC, the Visa International board also determined that the management of Visa International, in conjunction with representatives of the management of each region, should conduct a thorough evaluation of potential global restructuring options.

For the next few months, in parallel with region-specific structural evaluations, Visa International, with participation from all regions, evaluated potential global restructuring options. Throughout this evaluation period, frequent status updates were provided to each of the regional boards, which also continued to deliberate on region-specific alternatives.

On June 12, 2005 and August 25, 2005, the Visa U.S.A. board discussed governance and structural alternatives specific to Visa U.S.A. On July 29, 2005 and October 19, 2005, the Visa Canada board discussed region-specific governance, structural and ownership alternatives for Visa Canada, considering these options in light of the ongoing Visa International-led evaluation of global restructuring options. On October 24, 2005, the Visa LAC board discussed the business, legal and tax implications of regional incorporation and approved in principle the incorporation of Visa LAC, subject to a review of the conclusions and recommendations of the ongoing Visa International global restructuring evaluation. During this period Visa LAC retained Greenberg Traurig LLP, which we refer to as Greenberg Traurig, to provide legal advice to the board of Visa LAC in connection with its evaluation of restructuring options. On October 20, 2005, the Visa AP board extensively discussed governance and structural options, including regional incorporation, but determined not to take action that might be inconsistent with a global restructuring of the Visa enterprise until the Visa International global restructuring evaluation was complete. On October 25, 2005, the Visa CEMEA board engaged in extensive discussions before determining that it would wait until the completion of the Visa International global restructuring evaluation before pursuing the incorporation of Visa CEMEA.

At its regular meeting held on November 11, 2005, the Visa International board discussed the status of the global restructuring evaluation and the regional reorganization efforts. There was a consensus among the directors from the various regions that no region would implement any restructuring process without first consulting with the Visa International board, with the exception of Visa U.S.A.’s ongoing effort to add independent directors to its board. At this time, the Visa International board and all of the regional boards agreed to increase the frequency of their regularly scheduled and special meetings to consider potential global restructuring options.

At a special meeting of the Visa International board held on January 5, 2006, the board was updated on the current status of the Visa International-led evaluation of potential global restructuring options. The board also reviewed preliminary global restructuring options proposed by Visa U.S.A.

At a special meeting held on February 6, 2006, the Visa International board created an informal advisory group, led by Peter Hawkins, Chairman of the Visa AP board, and composed of directors of Visa International from each of the regions to oversee the review of global restructuring options and the development and refining of specific global restructuring options. The board also agreed that senior management representatives from

38

each of the regions would temporarily move to Visa International’s California corporate headquarters and would focus on the evaluation of four potential global restructuring options developed by the Visa International-led management team. The structures under consideration generally were:

• a unified entity where all Visa entities participate in a public offering;

• a public offering with the regions controlled to varying degrees by a newly created holding company;

• a public offering with the Visa brand held jointly by the current Visa entities and the holding company; and

• retention of the then-existing member association.

The management team was instructed to make a recommendation to the Visa International board by May 2006, and to provide regular updates to the Visa International and regional boards. McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, which we refer to as McKinsey, which had been retained by Visa International in December of 2004 to evaluate Visa International’s global operating model, provided strategic support and Greenhill & Co., LLC, which we refer to as Greenhill, which had been retained by Visa U.S.A. in December 2005 as a financial advisor to evaluate strategic alternatives, provided strategic and financial advice.

In parallel with assessing global restructuring options, the Visa regions continued to evaluate region-specific restructuring alternatives:

On January 17, 2006 and February 21, 2006, the Visa AP board held a lengthy discussion of the implications of the global restructuring options for Visa AP in the context of its previously proposed regional incorporation. On February 21, 2006, the board discussed the implications of the different global restructuring options, in light of their concerns that the current association model would not be sufficient to meet the needs of the current and future business environment.

On January 23, 2006, February 23, 2006, and March 27, 2006, the Visa CEMEA board reviewed the four global restructuring options under evaluation, expressing preliminary support for options contemplating a global public offering as best addressing the future needs of the Visa enterprise. The board also considered the conditions under which Visa CEMEA would consider participating in a global restructuring.

On January 25, 2006 and March 15, 2006, the Visa U.S.A. board debated the merits of the four global restructuring options as compared with Visa U.S.A. region-specific alternatives. At the March 15, 2006 meeting, the Visa U.S.A. board approved a proposal for approaching U.S.-based litigation in the context of a global restructuring.

On January 30, 2006, February 18, 2006, and March 27, 2006, the Visa LAC board reviewed the four global restructuring options and their implications for the Visa LAC region, including considerations related to U.S.-based litigation.

On January 30, 2006, February 22, 2006, and March 24, 2006, the Visa Canada board discussed the four global restructuring options in light of Visa Canada’s regional objectives. The Visa Canada board also reviewed the current status of Visa Canada’s evaluation of region-specific restructuring options. The board confirmed that Visa Canada was supportive of the global restructuring initiative and that any region-specific restructuring undertaken by Visa Canada would leave Visa Canada the flexibility to participate in a global restructuring once finalized.

At the regular Visa International board meeting held on February 27, 2006, through February 28, 2006, Mr. Hawkins and Visa International Chairman, William Campbell, presented an update on the ongoing

39

evaluation of global restructuring options. At the regular meeting of the Visa International board of directors held on March 29, 2006, the board formalized a governance and structure subcommittee to replace the advisory group previously constituted on February 6, 2006, to oversee Visa International’s restructuring efforts, with Mr. Hawkins as its Chairman. Mr. Hawkins then led a discussion on the current status of the global restructuring options, and the matters which would need to be resolved in order for the Visa International board to endorse a preferred approach. The board also discussed the preparation of a Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU, in order to facilitate achieving a consensus among the regions. The board also considered a proposal to address potential U.S.-based litigation liabilities in the context of the different global restructuring options.

In late April and early May of 2006, Mr. Hawkins met with each of the Visa regional boards to discuss the results of the global restructuring team’s evaluation of the global restructuring options. In particular, Mr. Hawkins discussed the emerging support for a global public offering with Visa Europe as a licensee, but also highlighted the need to retain “regionality,” or the global company’s ability to focus on and properly serve local markets. Mr. Hawkins met with the Visa AP board on April 18, 2006, the Visa LAC board on April 24, 2006, the Visa Canada board on April 26, 2006, the Visa U.S.A. board on April 27, 2006, the Visa Europe board on May 2, 2006, and the Visa CEMEA board on May 5, 2006. The Visa AP board, after lengthy discussion, expressed its support, in principle, for a global public offering with Visa Europe as a licensee and requested that Visa AP’s representatives on the Visa International board to attempt to build global consensus for this option. The Visa LAC board discussed the strategic, legal and business impacts of the global restructuring and expressed the view that preserving regionality was the key to a successful global restructuring solution. The Visa Canada board considered the strategic, legal and business implications of each of the restructuring options. The Visa Canada board noted that it believed that its current association model would not best position Visa Canada for future success and the board reached a preliminary consensus that a global solution offered numerous benefits, provided that regional focus could be preserved. The Visa U.S.A. board voiced support for a global public offering and discussed the required commitment of Visa U.S.A. and its members regarding U.S.-based litigation. The Visa CEMEA board noted that a global public offering with Visa Europe as a licensee appeared to be the best option, but determined that it should continue to consider other possible strategic alternatives available to the regions.

At a special meeting of the Visa International board of directors held on May 8 and 9, 2006, Mr. Hawkins led the board in a detailed overview of the four global restructuring options. Visa Canada President, Derek Fry, reviewed the global restructuring team’s analysis, evaluation criteria, and recommendation that Visa pursue a restructuring option, in which the Visa enterprise would be restructured into a global, for-profit, public company – Visa Inc. – with regionality. Under the recommended option, Visa Europe would retain its member-owned association structure and become an exclusive licensee of Visa Inc. Visa International President, Christopher Rodrigues, addressed the board regarding the conclusions drawn from a global strategy evaluation, which endorsed the recommendation made by the global restructuring team. Visa U.S.A. Executive Vice President, William Sheedy, then presented to the board an analysis of the valuation and marketability of all four global restructuring options, drawing on the advice of three investment banks consulted – Greenhill, Lehman Brothers Inc., which we refer to as Lehman Brothers, and which had been retained by Visa International in April of 2006, and UBS Investment Bank, which we refer to as UBS, and which had been retained by Visa LAC in             . Representatives from Lehman Brothers then reviewed with the board the advantages of a global float to the Visa enterprise. Director Richard Davis, acting in his capacity as a director of Visa U.S.A. and Visa U.S.A. General Counsel, Joshua Floum, presented to the Visa International board a privileged proposal regarding certain existing current U.S.-based litigation. Representatives from each of Greenhill and UBS then separately advised the board regarding various financial implications of each of the global restructuring options. Following the presentations of each of Greenhill and UBS, Mr. Hawkins led a discussion in which each of the regional presidents expressed his or her views on, and preference for, the recommended global restructuring option. After additional discussion, the Visa International board of directors unanimously endorsed the restructuring team’s recommendation and agreed on a process for negotiating a MOU, to be led by Mr. Hawkins and supported by management and a team of directors with representation from each region. The board determined that business model and valuation support for this phase would be provided by Lehman Brothers.

40

Negotiation of the Memorandum of Understanding and Board Approvals

This section describes the process by which director representatives from each Visa region, working closely with their respective regional boards, agreed to terms for a non-binding MOU to govern the global restructuring.

At a special meeting of the Visa LAC board held on May 29, 2006, the board reviewed the outcome of the Visa International board meeting held on May 8 and 9, 2006. The Visa LAC board expressed its interest in negotiating a mutually beneficial MOU for the creation of a global company, provided that it addressed the priorities of the LAC region, including responsibility for retrospective and prospective litigation, retention of an adequate level of regionality, appropriate valuation of LAC’s regional operations and specific interests, and creation and management of a global company that would result from a merger of Visa entities and not as part of an acquisition by one region. In late May of 2006, the Visa LAC board selected Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, which we refer to as Credit Suisse, as its financial advisor in connection with the restructuring.

At a special meeting of the Visa International board of directors held on May 31, 2006, Mr. Hawkins provided a general update on the timeline for negotiating the MOU, the substantive open issues, and the role of regional management and directors in the drafting and negotiation process. Visa U.S.A. President, John Coghlan, and Visa Europe President, Peter Ayliffe, gave an update on principles of the proposed licensor/licensee relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe. Representatives from Lehman Brothers reviewed the progress on developing an agreed-upon methodology for allocating ownership of Visa Inc. among the regions, noting that some regions provide higher growth while other regions provide economies of scale. Mr. Campbell noted Visa International management’s recommendation to retain White & Case LLP, which we refer to as White & Case, to support the Visa International board as a legal advisor on activities related to the restructuring.

At telephonic meetings of the Visa U.S.A. board held on June 2, 2006 and June 14, 2006, Mr. Sheedy and Mr. Floum led the board in a discussion of the MOU. Mr. Sheedy further discussed a methodology for allocating ownership in Visa Inc., which would be presented to each of the regional boards, including that actual earnings would be the benchmark for which Visa Inc. would be valued in the public market and should serve as the basis for relative value.

In June 6, 2006, the board of directors of Visa International retained White & Case to act as its independent legal counsel in connection with the restructuring.

On June 8, 2006, the board of Visa AP retained Macquarie (Hong Kong) Limited, which we refer to as Macquarie, to provide financial and strategic advice to the board.

At the regular meeting of the Visa AP board held on June 15, 2006, Mr. Campbell, acting in his capacity as Chairman of the Visa International board, reported on the progress made on the global restructuring proposal at the Visa International board meetings, including the unanimous selection of the recommended restructuring option at the May 9, 2006 Visa International board meeting and the progress to date in drafting preliminary versions of the MOU. The Visa AP board debated the merits of the recommended restructuring option and the current draft of the MOU. The board passed a resolution supporting the recommended restructuring option. Mr. Sheedy and a representative from Greenhill joined the meeting by telephone and presented a proposal for allocating ownership in Visa Inc.

At a special telephonic meeting of the Visa Canada board held on June 16, 2006, directors and management representing Visa U.S.A. met with directors and management representing Visa Canada. The representatives of Visa U.S.A. presented their perspective on the terms on which the proposed global restructuring ought to be completed and presented a proposal for allocating ownership in Visa Inc.

41

At the regular meeting of the Visa LAC board held on June 22, 2006, with the presence of representatives from the external legal and financial advisors to the Visa LAC board, Greenberg Traurig and Credit Suisse, the board reviewed the draft MOU in light of Visa LAC’s requirements and received advice from Greenberg Traurig regarding the proposed MOU. On June 23, 2006, the board held a second session in which representatives of the Visa U.S.A. board provided their perspective on the terms on which the proposed global restructuring ought to be completed and presented a proposal for allocating ownership in Visa Inc. The board then considered the Visa U.S.A. presentation.

At the regular meeting of the Visa CEMEA board held on June 23, 2006, the board reviewed the draft MOU and extensively discussed areas of particular importance to Visa CEMEA. Representatives from the Visa U.S.A. board joined the meeting by telephone and provided their perspective on the terms on which the proposed global restructuring ought to be completed and presented a proposal for allocating ownership in Visa Inc. In executive session, the CEMEA board discussed the Visa U.S.A. proposal and other considerations relative to the proposed restructuring.

At a special telephonic meeting of the Visa Canada board held on June 23, 2006, the board discussed the Visa U.S.A. proposal presented on June 16, 2006, and debated specific issues related to the draft MOU.

At a regular meeting of the Visa International board of directors held on June 27, 2006, directors representing each region updated the board on key negotiation issues related to their respective region, and expressed continued willingness to support the recommended restructuring. Mr. Hawkins briefed the board on a two-part negotiation process, one part focusing on negotiations among the regions participating in Visa Inc., and the other part between the regions participating in Visa Inc. and Visa Europe. Immediately following this meeting, directors representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. submitted an offer to directors representing Visa Europe, which offer was not accepted. Key issues to be resolved included the royalty amount payable in connection with Visa Europe’s license and specific monetary consideration to be paid to Visa Europe.

On June 27, 2006, Visa Canada, Visa AP, Visa CEMEA and Visa LAC jointly retained Latham & Watkins LLP, which we refer to as Latham & Watkins, as their special U.S. counsel with respect to the restructuring.

At special meetings on July 9 and 31, 2006, the Visa LAC board reviewed progress made in the negotiations concerning the MOU. On July 18, 2006, the Visa LAC Board formally retained Credit Suisse. Credit Suisse and Greenberg Traurig were present at the July 31, 2006 meeting. During this meeting, Greenberg Traurig provided legal advice to the board regarding the terms of the MOU.

On July 18, 2006, the board of Visa LAC retained Credit Suisse to provide financial advice to the Board.

At meetings held from July 19, 2006 through July 21, 2006, directors representing the regions that intended to become subsidiaries of Visa Inc. negotiated the terms of the MOU terms and reached preliminary agreement on an ownership allocation methodology among the participating regions based on projected earnings contribution to Visa Inc., subject to confirmation by the regional chief financial officers.

At a special meeting of the Visa International board of directors held on July 25, 2006, Mr. Hawkins provided an update on the substantial progress made in resolving issues among the regions participating in Visa Inc. and advised the board that future negotiations would primarily focus on Visa Inc.’s relationship with Visa Europe.

At meetings held from August 2, 2006 through August 4, 2006 and from August 15, 2006 through August 17, 2006, directors representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. negotiated terms with directors representing Visa Europe.

At a special meeting of the Visa International board of directors held on August 21, 2006, Mr. Hawkins advised the board that agreements in-principle had been reached between the regions participating in Visa Inc. and Visa Europe on financial terms and that management teams from the regions participating in Visa Inc. would finalize share ownership methodology.

42

At meetings held on August 21, 2006 through August 26, 2006, the chief financial officers of Visa AP, Visa Canada, Visa CEMEA, Visa LAC, and Visa U.S.A., completed due diligence on the ownership allocation methodology agreed to at the July 21, 2006 negotiations. The chief financial officers also reached consensus on a process to rebalance, or true-up, ownership share based on regional financial performance following the formation of Visa Inc.

At a regularly scheduled telephonic meeting of the Visa U.S.A. board held on September 1, 2006, Mr. Floum advised the board regarding the legal standards applicable to its decision regarding the restructuring. Mr. Hawkins and representatives from Visa International then described the draft MOU and the proposed process for approving the MOU. The Visa International representatives then left the call, and the Visa U.S.A. directors discussed the terms of the restructuring in detail.

At meetings held on September 6, 2006, directors representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. negotiated final terms of the MOU with directors representing Visa Europe.

At a special telephonic meeting of the Visa CEMEA board held on September 7, 2006, Mr. Hawkins and Visa International Deputy General Counsel, Thomas M’Guinness, gave a general update on the status of the negotiations regarding the MOU. Representatives from White & Case discussed the legal aspects of establishing Visa Inc. and Mr. M’Guinness explained the most recent modifications to the MOU. A representative from Lehman Brothers then reviewed with the board the ownership and valuation methodology behind the ownership allocation reflected in the MOU, and further clarified the true-up process in response to questions. ABN AMRO Corporate Finance Limited, which was retained as Visa CEMEA’s financial advisor on September 15, 2006, and which we refer to as ABN AMRO, then presented a preliminary valuation for Visa CEMEA and explained the methodology they used. Visa CEMEA General Counsel, Adrian Phillips, described the MOU and Visa CEMEA Chairman, Vivian Bartlett, raised additional points of information for the directors, including a discussion of a minimum allocation of ownership in Visa Inc. for members of Visa CEMEA. The CEMEA board then approved a resolution endorsing the MOU, subject to satisfactorily addressing responsibility for current U.S.-based litigation and the incorporation of a transparent true-up process in the definitive agreements.

At a special telephonic board meeting of the Visa AP board held on September 7, 2006, Mr. Hawkins advised the board that the method for allocating ownership in Visa Inc. had been agreed to by the negotiating directors for each of the regions participating in Visa Inc., subject to the approval of the MOU by their respective boards, that an agreement in principle had been reached on terms with Visa Europe, and that Visa U.S.A.’s proposal on U.S.-based litigation was satisfactory.

At a regularly scheduled board meeting of the Visa Canada board held on September 8, 2006, Visa Canada’s Chief Financial Officer, Tim Wilson, reviewed the process undertaken to validate the methodology underlying the ownership allocation set forth in the MOU. Mr. Wilson also explained the true-up process. The Board discussed specific negotiation points in the MOU, aided by Mr. Hawkins and Mr. M’Guinness, on behalf of Visa International, representatives of Lehman Brothers, Visa International’s financial advisor, who participated by telephone, and representatives of Latham & Watkins, Visa Canada’s external U.S. counsel, who participated by telephone. The board then heard from Mr. Davis, Director Charles Doyle, acting in his capacity as a director of Visa U.S.A., and Mr. Floum, as representatives of Visa U.S.A., regarding the MOU.

At a regularly scheduled telephonic meeting of the Visa U.S.A. board held on September 8, 2006, management presented a summary of the negotiations of the MOU. Representatives from Visa U.S.A.’s external legal counsel reviewed with the board its fiduciary duties and appropriate process in connection with the transaction. Representatives from Greenhill reviewed for the board its financial analysis and stated that Greenhill expected to be in a position to deliver a formal opinion to the Visa U.S.A. board regarding the fairness, from a

43

financial point of view, of the consideration to be received by the members of Visa U.S.A. in the proposed transaction at the time of the execution of the definitive agreements.

At a special telephonic meeting of the Visa LAC board of directors held on September 6, 2006, with the presence of representatives from Greenberg Traurig and Credit Suisse, Mr. Hawkins, assisted by Mr. M’Guinness, presented the terms and conditions of the MOU. Representatives from Lehman Brothers reviewed with the board their views on how a public offering of equity securities of a company constructed under the proposed MOU would be received by potential investors. Directors deliberated on the terms of the MOU and asked numerous questions to representatives from White & Case and Lehman Brothers on specific terms of the MOU. After additional deliberation, the directors unanimously endorsed the MOU, subject to conducting legal due diligence to confirm the viability of Visa U.S.A.’s commitments regarding certain U.S.-based litigation.

At a special meeting of the Visa International board of directors held on September 12, 2006, the board discussed the proposed MOU in detail, reviewed due diligence findings and received the advice of third-party legal counsel and financial advisors. At the conclusion of the meeting, a statement of support for the MOU was signed by all directors and regional presidents in attendance. Following this meeting, White & Case’s engagement was expanded to include acting as independent counsel to the Transition Governance Committee in connection with the restructuring.

At a special meeting of the Visa Canada board held on September 28, 2006, the Visa Canada board reviewed the final draft of the MOU, including the side letter that included provisions for a transition governance committee, comprised of directors from each region and Visa International, to lead the development and implementation of definitive agreements implementing the restructuring. After additional discussion on the true-up process, the board unanimously approved the MOU and related side letter.

Over the course of a series of four meetings held between September 13, 2006 and September 29, 2006, the board of Visa U.S.A. reviewed the MOU in detail, including an evaluation of the structure contemplated by the proposed transaction as compared to a Visa U.S.A. standalone solution, a detailed financial analysis provided by Greenhill, and a presentation by Mr. Sheedy and a representative from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, which firm was on retainer to Visa U.S.A., on tax considerations. On September 29, 2006, after a discussion of the board’s fiduciary duties with a representative from external counsel, Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, which we refer to as Holme Roberts & Owen, the Visa U.S.A. board unanimously approved the MOU and side letters.

At a special telephonic meeting of the Visa LAC board held on October 2, 2006, Visa LAC General Counsel, Carlos Vásquez, reviewed the changes made to the MOU since the board’s September 6, 2006 meeting. The board debated the modifications made to the MOU, including the side letter provisions for the Transition Governance Committee. After extensive deliberation, the board endorsed the final MOU and side letter.

At a special telephonic meeting of the Visa AP board held on October 4, 2006, Visa AP President, Rupert Keeley, discussed the terms of the MOU and noted that he considered the financial terms to be acceptable to Visa AP. Representatives of Macquarie confirmed to the board that Macquarie had worked closely with the Visa AP management in evaluating the MOU and that Macquarie viewed the overall outcome as equitable and acceptable. Mr. Hawkins explained the additional provisions added to the MOU, including the provisions in the side letter relating to the formation of a transition governance committee. A representative from Macquarie updated the directors on the process by which the regional chief financial officers had reviewed each region’s financial projections. The representative from Macquarie further noted that the process of negotiation has been well-managed and equitable and overall Macquarie believes that the outcome has been positive for Visa AP. After additional discussion, the Visa AP board passed a resolution unanimously endorsing the MOU and side letter.

At the special meeting of the Visa International board of directors held on October 9, 2006, the board, after deliberation regarding the changes to the MOU and the related side letter and after noting that all six regional

44

boards had approved the MOU after deliberation with their respective third-party legal and financial advisors, passed a motion approving the MOU and side letter. Following this meeting, the regions and Visa International issued a joint press release on October 11, 2006 announcing the proposed restructuring.

Development of the Transaction Documents and Approval

This section describes the process by which director representatives from each Visa region, working closely with their respective regional boards, agreed to the detailed terms of the transaction documents.

During the weeks of October 2, 2006 and October 23, 2006, the regional boards finalized their director representatives to the transition governance committee, including Mr. Bartlett of Visa CEMEA, Mr. Campbell of Visa International, Alberta Cefis of Visa Canada, Mr. Davis, Mr. Doyle and John Stumpf of Visa U.S.A., Mr. Hawkins of Visa AP, Segismundo Schulín-Zeuthen of Visa LAC, and Hans Van Der Velde of Visa Europe.

At four meetings that took place between January 15, 2007 and February 12, 2007, management and directors representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. and management and directors from Visa Europe negotiated financial terms of the restructuring agreement and legal and business terms of the licensor/licensee relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe.

After obtaining agreement by each of the Visa regional boards during the week of February 5, 2007, at the regular meeting of the Visa International board held on February 13, 2007, the Visa International board approved the recommendation of the transition governance committee to appoint Joseph Saunders as the Executive Chairman-designee of the board of Visa Inc., once Visa Inc. was formed.

At a regular meeting of the Visa LAC board of directors on February 6, 2007, Mr. Vásquez updated the board on the status of the negotiations regarding the transaction documents.

At a meeting held on February 26, 2007 through February 28, 2007, management and directors representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. and management and directors from Visa Europe negotiated financial terms of the restructuring agreement and legal and business terms of the licensor/licensee relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe.

At a regular meeting of the Visa CEMEA board of directors on March 3, 2007, a representative from White & Case reviewed the fiduciary responsibilities of the board regarding the proposed transaction. Visa International General Counsel, Tom M’Guinness, updated the board on the status of the negotiations regarding the transaction documents. A representative from Latham & Watkins reviewed a presentation on the mechanism designed to address the current U.S.-based litigation. The board then engaged in an extensive discussion about specific aspects of the proposed restructuring, including the proposed mechanism for addressing current U.S.-based litigation and regionality.

During a series of meetings and telephone calls held between March 11, 2007 through April 3, 2007, management and directors representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. and management and directors representing Visa Europe negotiated financial terms of the restructuring agreement and business terms of the licensor/licensee relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe.

At a regular meeting of the Visa Canada board of directors held on April 10, 2007, the board reviewed the current status of the negotiations in respect of the transaction documents, including the latest proposal on current U.S.-based litigation, and the regional true-up process. The board then discussed items related to the restructuring that were specific to Visa Canada, including tax, legal, and regionality considerations.

At a meeting held on April 15, 2007, management and directors representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. and management and directors from Visa Europe negotiated the final financial terms of the restructuring agreement and continued to negotiate the business terms of the licensor/licensee relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe.

45

At a regular meeting of the Visa International board of directors held on April 17, 2007, Mr. Saunders reviewed with the board the current status of the transaction documents negotiation. The board discussed various issues related to the transaction, including the true-up process, the agreements with Visa Europe, tax considerations, and the mechanism and terms for addressing the current U.S.-based litigation. In executive session, the board approved the appointment of Mr. Saunders as Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc., in addition to his duties as Executive Chairman of the board of directors of Visa Inc., subject to approval by each of the regional boards.

At the regular meeting of the Visa U.S.A. board of directors held on April 18, 2007, a representative from Greenhill presented its analysis of the valuation consideration to be received by members of Visa U.S.A. A representative from Holme Roberts & Owen, discussed the next steps in the restructuring process.

At a special meeting of the Visa U.S.A. board of directors held on April 27, 2007, the board approved the appointment of Mr. Saunders as Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc.

During a series of meetings and telephone calls that took place between April 30, 2007 and May 3, 2007, management representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. and management from Visa Europe negotiated detailed business terms of the licensor/licensee relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe.

At a regular meeting of the Visa Canada board of directors on May 8, 2007, a representative from White & Case reviewed the current status of the transaction documents and answered questions from the Board. A representative from Latham & Watkins reviewed a presentation on the mechanism designed to address the current U.S.-based litigation. The board then reviewed the current status of potential tax considerations to Visa Canada and its members as a result of the proposed restructuring. In executive session, the board approved the appointment of Mr. Saunders as Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc.

At a series of meetings held between May 8, 2007 and May 10, 2007, management representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. and management from Visa Europe negotiated detailed business terms of the licensor/licensee relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe.

At a special meeting of the Visa LAC board of directors on May 10, 2007, Mr. Saunders, reviewed the status of the development of the transaction documents. Mr. Vásquez, reviewed the role of the regional board and its fiduciary duties regarding the proposed transaction. A representative from White & Case discussed the status of the negotiations in respect to the transaction documents, and further described the mechanisms in those documents designed to address the current U.S.-based litigation. Thereafter, a representative from Latham & Watkins expressed that firm’s advice on such mechanisms. After careful consideration of Latham & Watkins evaluation of the proposal, the board adopted a resolution with specific recommendations on changes designed to address Visa LAC’s concerns. In executive session, the board approved the appointment of Mr. Saunders as Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc.

At a special meeting of the Visa AP board of directors held on May 10, 2007, Mr. Hawkins reviewed the directors their fiduciary responsibilities in connection with the evaluation of the proposed restructuring, referencing the advice of White & Case on this issue. Mr. Saunders reviewed the status of the transaction documents and answered questions related to the restructuring, including U.S.-sited litigation, the agreements with Visa Europe, and regionality. A representative from Latham & Watkins presented his firm’s advice on the restructuring and the mechanism for addressing current U.S.-based litigation, which was followed by extensive board discussion on these issues. A representative from Macquarie then provided an overview of the fairness opinion process, in anticipation of the delivery of its opinion regarding the fairness of the restructuring from a financial point of view, which opinion was anticipated to be delivered to the board at its June 7, 2007 meeting. In executive session, the board approved the appointment of Mr. Saunders as Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc.

46

At a special meeting of the Visa CEMEA board of directors on May 11, 2007, the board was advised of the process and timeline related to the proposed transaction. Visa CEMEA General Counsel, Adrian Phillips, with a representative from Latham & Watkins, led the board in a full review of the proposed mechanism for addressing current U.S.-based litigation contained in the transaction documents. A representative from ABN AMRO overviewed the process pursuant to which her firm was anticipated to provide an opinion to the board regarding the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be received in the restructuring by the Visa CEMEA members at its meeting scheduled for June 8, 2007. In executive session, the board approved the appointment of Mr. Saunders as Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc.

At a meeting held on May 14, 2007, management and directors representing the regions participating in Visa Inc. and management and directors from Visa Europe agreed to final terms regarding the business terms of the licensor/licensee relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe.

At a regular meeting of the Visa International board of directors on May 15, 2007, a representative from White & Case reviewed the relevant director duties as they related to the proposed restructuring. Mr. M’Guinness provided an update on the current status of the transaction documents. A representative from Lehman Brothers reviewed with the board the evaluation considerations and process by which it was anticipated that Lehman Brothers would deliver to the board an opinion as to the fairness of the restructuring from a financial point of view.

At a special telephonic meeting of the Visa LAC board held on May 29, 2007, Visa LAC General Counsel, Mr. Vásquez, reviewed the status of the recommendations developed by the board at its May 10 meeting. A White & Case representative provided the board with an overview of the presentation he would be providing at the Visa LAC June 8 board meeting, and answered questions from directors with respect to the current U.S.-based litigation. A representative from Credit Suisse described the fairness opinion that the firm was anticipated to provide at the meeting of the board scheduled for June 8, 2007.

At a regular meeting of the Visa Canada board of directors on May 31, 2007, Mr. Saunders reviewed the status of the transaction documents, noting the strong mechanism designed to address the current U.S.-based litigation and the importance of enhancing Visa’s business globally while maintaining a strong regional focus. A representative from Dundee Securities Corporation, which we refer to as Dundee, and which had been retained by Visa Canada in January of 2006, Visa Canada’s financial advisor, made a presentation to the board and advised the board that, in the opinion of Dundee the consideration received is fair from a financial perspective as described under “—Opinion of Visa Canada’s Financial Advisor.”

At a special meeting of the Visa Canada board of directors on June 7, 2007, a representative from White & Case discussed the transaction documents and the board noted that it would reconvene within a week to approve the transaction documents pending the satisfactory resolution of four considerations, primarily related to specific language related to U.S.-sited litigation.

At a special meeting of the Visa U.S.A. board of directors on June 7, 2007, Mr. Saunders reviewed the transaction documents and described the final terms concerning the transaction. He also discussed modifications to the terms of the MOU in the transaction documents. Members of the Visa U.S.A. management then discussed the transaction with the board, and, with Mr. Saunders, answered questions from the board. A representative from Greenhill reviewed its valuation analysis and delivered its oral opinion, that as of that date, the consideration to be received by the members of Visa U.S.A. in the proposed transaction is fair from a financial point of view to such members, as described under “—Opinion of Visa U.S.A.’s Financial Advisor.” The board also reviewed with a representative from Holme Roberts & Owen its fiduciary duties and reviewed the process the board had followed in initiating, structuring and negotiating the transaction. Following the presentations and board discussions, the board unanimously (with one member not present) approved the Global Restructuring Agreement, found it advisable and in the best interests of Visa U.S.A. and its members, taken as a whole and recommending that the Visa International board approve the restructuring agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

47

At a regular meeting of the Visa AP board of directors on June 7, 2007, the board discussed in detail the proposed restructuring including the terms of the related agreements, considerations surrounding the current U.S.-based litigation and the mechanism in the transaction documents to address this issue. The board received legal advice from a representative of White & Case and a representative of Latham & Watkins. Among other things, White & Case provided an overview of the board’s fiduciary duties and the process followed by the board in initiating, structuring and negotiating the restructuring, and an overview of the transaction documents. A representative from Macquarie reviewed the financial analysis and consideration given to the proposed transaction, advising the board that it is the firm’s opinion that the consideration received is fair from a financial perspective as described under “—Opinion of Visa AP’s Financial Advisor.” Following extensive additional discussion, and noting the careful deliberation by the board on all aspects of the proposed transaction, the board, noted its intention to approve the restructuring and recommend its approval to the board of directors of Visa International, subject to specific revisions to the Global Restructuring Agreement that were subsequently met. The meeting was subsequently recessed until June 15, 2007.

At a special meeting of the Visa CEMEA board of directors on June 8, 2007, the board discussed in detail the proposed restructuring, including the terms of the related agreements and considerations surrounding the U.S.-sited litigation and the mechanism in the transaction documents to address this issue. The board received legal advice from a representative of White & Case and a representative of Latham & Watkins. Among other things, White & Case provided an overview of the board’s fiduciary duties and the process followed by the board in initiating, structuring and negotiating the restructuring, and an overview of the transaction documents. A representative from ABN AMRO reviewed its financial analysis and rendered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing, that as at such date and subject to the assumptions, qualifications, considerations and limitations set forth in the written opinion the consideration to be received in the restructuring by the Visa CEMEA members was fair, from a financial point of view, to the Visa CEMEA members, as described under “—Opinion of Visa CEMEA’s Financial Advisor.” Following additional discussion, and noting the careful deliberation by the board on all aspects of the proposed transaction, the board, by a unanimous vote of all members participating, approved a resolution recommending that the Visa International board of directors approve the Global Restructuring Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, subject to specific conditions that were subsequently met in principle, and determined that the Global Restructuring Agreement and related transactions were advisable and in the best interests of Visa CEMEA and its members, taken as a whole.

At a special meeting of the Visa LAC board on June 8, 2007, a representative from White & Case provided legal advice to the board and an overview of the board’s fiduciary duties and the process followed by the board in initiating, structuring and negotiating the restructuring, and an overview of the transaction documents. Mr. Vásquez updated the board on the status of the transaction documents. Director discussion followed, with the board expressing comfort with the proposed transaction documents. A representative from Credit Suisse reviewed the process and financial analysis given to the transaction and advised the board that it is the firm’s opinion that the consideration received is fair from a financial perspective as described under “—Opinion of Visa LAC’s Financial Advisor.” At this time, Mr. Saunders joined the meeting and reviewed the objectives for Visa’s restructuring and certain key terms of the transaction documents. Following additional discussion and consideration, the board by a unanimous vote of all members participating passed a resolution recommending that the Visa International board approve the Global Restructuring Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, provided there were no further changes that would cause a material adverse effect on the interests of Visa LAC, and determined that the Global Restructuring Agreement and related transactions were advisable and in the best interests of Visa LAC and its members, taken as a whole.

At a special meeting of the Visa International board of directors on June 11, 2007, the board reviewed in detail the proposed restructuring, including a detailed discussion of the terms of the agreements regarding the restructuring and considerations surrounding the current U.S.-based litigation and the mechanism in the transaction documents to address this issue. The board received legal advice from its counsel, White & Case,

48

including an overview of the board’s fiduciary duties, a review of the process followed by the board in initiating, structuring and negotiating the restructuring, and an overview of the transaction documents. A representative from Lehman Brothers reviewed the financial analysis and rendered Lehman Brothers’ opinion to the board that the restructuring was fair to Visa International and its constituent members taken as a whole from a financial point of view, as described under “—Opinion of Visa International’s Financial Advisor.” The board then proceeded in executive session. During the executive session, the board received the recommendation of each of the regional boards. Following additional discussion, and noting the careful deliberation by the board on all aspects of the proposed transaction, the board unanimously approved a resolution approving the Global Restructuring Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, determining that they were advisable and in the best interests of Visa International and its members, taken as a whole, and recommending that the members of Visa International approve the Global Restructuring Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. The approval and recommendation of the board of Visa International was expressly made subject to the receipt of specific confirmation by the boards of directors of each of Visa Canada, Visa AP and Visa Europe that all conditions to their recommendations has been satisfied.

At a special meeting of the Executive Committee of the Visa Europe board of directions held on June 13, 2007, the executive committee confirmed that the conditions specified in its approval and recommendation were satisfied.

At a special meeting of the Visa Canada board of directors on June 13, 2007, after noting the careful deliberation given to all aspects of the restructuring transaction and the fairness opinions and advice provided by third-party legal and financial advisors, the board unanimously passed a resolution noting that the conditions specified in its approval had been satisfied and finding the Global Restructuring Agreement advisable and in the best interests of Visa Canada and its members, taken as a whole and confirming its recommendation to the board of Visa International.

On June 15, 2007, the Visa AP board reconvened and, after noting the careful consideration given to the proposed transaction and the third-party fairness opinion provided by Macquarie and the revisions to the transaction documents since June 7, 2007, to take into account the board’s concerns, the board by a unanimous vote of those participating approved a resolution confirming its recommendation that the Visa International board of directors enter into the proposed transaction and approve the Global Restructuring Agreement and determining that the restructuring is advisable and in the best interests of Visa AP and its members, taken as a whole.

At a special meeting of the Executive Committee of the Visa Europe board of directions held on June 13, 2007, the executive committee confirmed that the conditions specified in its approval and recommendation were satisfied.

At a special meeting of the Visa Canada board of directors on June 13, 2007, after noting the careful deliberation given to all aspects of the restructuring transaction and the fairness opinions and advice provided by third-party legal and financial advisors, the board unanimously passed a resolution noting that the conditions specified in its approval had been satisfied and finding the Global Restructuring Agreement advisable and in the best interests of Visa Canada and its members, taken as a whole and confirming its recommendation to the board of Visa International.

Visa International’s, Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa Canada’s Reasons for the Global Restructuring

In deciding to approve the restructuring agreement, the board of directors of each of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada considered a number of factors and held discussions with senior management and certain financial, business and legal advisors of each of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, respectively, relating to strategic, business, legal, regulatory and other matters. Although the following discussion sets forth the key factors considered by the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa

49

Canada in reaching their decisions, it may not include all of the factors considered. In general, in light of the number and variety of factors considered, none of the boards of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Visa Canada considered it practical to, and did not attempt to, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in reaching its decision. Each board believes that its decision was made on the basis of all of the available information presented to it, although each individual board of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Visa Canada, and indeed each individual board member, may have given different weight to different factors and may have made its decision primarily on the basis of a factor that did not merit the same level of consideration by other boards or members.

Positive Factors

The positive factors that the boards of directors considered in approving the restructuring include, but are not limited to, those set forth below. Certain statements in this section are forward-looking in nature and, therefore, should be read in light of the discussion under “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Facilitation of Initial Public Offering. One important purpose of the restructuring is to consolidate what are now three separate associations—Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada—as subsidiaries of a single stock corporation, Visa Inc., in order to facilitate the ability of the consolidated entities to raise capital by offering shares to the public as part of a single issuer in an initial public offering. In addition, the boards of directors believe that an initial public offering by a single consolidated entity would constitute a higher-value offering than if similar offerings were undertaken on an individual basis by separate entities.

Streamlined Decision-Making. As a result of the restructuring, the Visa regions other than Visa Europe will become either direct or indirect subsidiaries or operating divisions of Visa Inc. Visa Inc. will be governed by a single board of directors. The board of directors of Visa International believes that this change in structure will streamline Visa Inc.’s ability to make and execute strategic decisions and allow it to respond with greater agility to competitive and market developments as compared to the current structure, which has historically relied upon multiple regional board approvals for certain material corporate actions.

Improved Strategic and Business Flexibility. The boards of directors believe that the holding company structure will facilitate business growth by providing a more flexible structure that is better suited to a variety of strategic transactions, such as acquiring new businesses and entering into joint ventures. For example, following the restructuring, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will be able to better integrate newly acquired businesses or technologies by bringing them into the new consolidated structure or by creating new corporate entities to pursue or develop new businesses. In addition, the boards believe that the holding company structure will enhance Visa Inc.’s ability to coordinate business on a global basis, while allowing it to maintain existing competitive advantages, such as strong local market relationships, expertise and execution.

Global Competitiveness. The boards of directors believe that the global restructuring will enable Visa Inc. to facilitate a common, global approach, where appropriate, to the legal, regulatory and competitive issues arising in today’s marketplace. Many of the legal and regulatory challenges that we face are in part directed at our current ownership and governance structure as a membership corporation in which ownership interests and voting rights are limited to our customers—member financial institutions. While we strongly dispute these challenges, we believe that certain governance and structural reforms—such as moving to a majority of independent directors at the closing of the restructuring and moving to a more open ownership base at the closing of an initial public offering—will be seen as increasing the openness, diversity and transparency of our business and governance. As a result, we believe these proposals will place our business in a better position as we defend ourselves against the legal and regulatory challenges relating to our ownership and governance.

Operational Efficiency and Continuity. The boards of directors believe that the restructuring presents an opportunity to increase operational efficiency and achieve cost savings by combining certain functions within the overall Visa enterprise. In addition, the boards of directors believe that the participating entities can achieve the

50

benefits listed above, among others, without disrupting key existing operations. For example, by retaining Visa International and Visa U.S.A. as non-stock corporate subsidiaries of Visa Inc., Visa International and Visa U.S.A. should be able to maintain in place effective customer relationships, including most licensing arrangements and membership agreements. In addition, by retaining the non-stock corporations at the subsidiary level, Visa Inc. will retain the operational flexibility of managing key aspects of its payments system through bylaws and operating regulations.

Combination of Global Scale and European Focus. The boards of directors believe that the post restructuring arrangement of the entire Visa organization combines the efficiencies of global scale with the recognition of Europe’s unique business and economic environment. Under the new structure, the Visa enterprise expects to work seamlessly, enhancing interoperability, reliability and security for Visa members, customers, cardholders and merchants around the world.

Negative Factors

In addition to the positive factors listed above, the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada also identified and considered a number of uncertainties and challenges relating to the proposed restructuring, including, without limitation, the risks set forth below and under “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Restructuring”:

• the risk that the restructuring might not be completed in a timely manner or at all, as a result of the failure to gain the requisite member approval or meet other conditions to closing;

• the risk that the loss of board seats currently held by individuals who are also officers of certain members as a result of the restructuring process could have a detrimental effect on Visa Inc.’s business relationship with such member or members;

• the risk that the potential benefits and strategic goals of the global restructuring may not be realized;

• the risk of missed strategic opportunities, increased costs and other negative effects arising from the diversion of management’s focus and resources from operational matters while working to implement the global restructuring;

• the risk that the shift of the business relationship with Visa Europe from our current membership association-based relationship to a license-based relationship will reduce our ability to effectively coordinate with Visa Europe’s operations and may otherwise cause our relationship with Visa Europe to deteriorate; and

• the risk that the new senior management of Visa Inc. may not be able to effectively integrate and manage the operations of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada as consolidated entities under a single holding company.

Visa Europe’s Reasons for Remaining Independent

Visa Europe’s board believes that the decision to remain a separate entity and enter into exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable licenses with Visa Inc. in the global restructuring will provide a number of significant strategic opportunities and benefits to Visa Europe including the following:

• SEPA. Visa Europe’s board believes that being owned and governed by Europe’s banks enables Visa Europe to be well positioned to deliver a borderless payment market for Europe and meet the goals of its member banks, consumers and merchants, as well as the European Commission’s vision of a Single Euro Payments Area, or SEPA. Visa Europe’s board also believes that the significant changes brought about by SEPA can best be managed through the current corporate structure and that Visa Europe will be very well positioned to realize the SEPA vision and create payment and processing solutions tailored to Europe’s needs, such as V PAY, a new pan European debit card, based entirely on chip and PIN. Visa Europe has also developed a switching system, Visa authorization, which is designed to

51

enable its members to meet their SEPA requirements. This switching system is expected to lower transaction costs, deliver greater scalability and flexibility and meet local market needs with locally configured payment services. In addition, a new European clearing and settlement platform is currently being developed.

• European Focus. Visa Europe’s board believes that to remain separate from Visa Inc. is a European market-driven decision that facilitates continued European governance of Visa Europe and will enable Visa Europe to dedicate its resources to the unique needs of its European customers. Delivering infrastructure investments, multi-lateral agreements and interdependent innovations requires a collaborative approach, and the membership model provides the mechanism for this collaboration.

• Innovative Solutions. Visa Europe will be well placed to partner with its banks to deliver innovative, value-creating solutions such as European specific contactless payments, which build upon the EMV chip and PIN investment.

• Combination of Global Scale and European Focus. Visa Europe’s board believes that the post-restructuring arrangement of the entire Visa organization combines the efficiencies of global scale with the recognition of Europe’s unique business and economic environment. Under the new structure, the Visa enterprise expects to work seamlessly, enhancing interoperability, reliability and security for Visa members, customers, cardholders and merchants around the world.

Opinions of Financial Advisors

In connection with their consideration of the restructuring transactions, each of the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada, Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA retained financial advisors to provide them with an opinion with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the restructuring.

Opinion of Visa International’s Financial Advisor

In February 2007, Visa International’s board of directors retained Lehman Brothers to act as its financial advisor with respect to the restructuring. On June 11, 2007, Lehman Brothers rendered its oral opinion (subsequently confirmed in writing) to Visa International’s board of directors that, as of such date, and, based upon and subject to the matters stated in its opinion, from a financial point of view, the restructuring was fair to Visa International and its constituent members taken as a whole, which includes Visa AP, Visa LAC, Visa CEMEA, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe, which are collectively referred to as the Visa regions, and each, a Visa region.

The full text of Lehman Brothers’ written opinion, dated June 11, 2007, is attached as Annex E to this proxy statement-prospectus. Lehman Brothers provided its opinion for the information and assistance of the board of directors of Visa International in connection with its consideration of the restructuring. Lehman Brothers has not been requested to opine as to, and Lehman Brothers’ opinion does not in any manner address, Visa International’s underlying business decision to proceed with or effect the restructuring or the fairness of the consideration being received by each Visa entity or its member banks on an individual or relative basis. Lehman Brothers’ opinion is not a recommendation as to how any member should vote with respect to the restructuring. You are encouraged to read Lehman Brothers’ opinion in its entirety for a discussion of the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered and limitations upon the review undertaken by Lehman Brothers in rendering its opinion. The following is a summary of Lehman Brothers’ opinion and the methodology that Lehman Brothers used to render its opinion. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion.

In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers reviewed and analyzed:

• the restructuring agreement, the related transaction documents and the specific terms of the restructuring;

52

• the organizational and operational documents of the Visa enterprise and the financial and operating information with respect to the business, operations and prospects of Visa International and each Visa entity furnished to Lehman Brothers by Visa International, including historical financial results for fiscal 2006 and fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, and financial projections through fiscal 2010 of Visa International and each Visa entity prepared by the managements of Visa International and each Visa entity, respectively;

• a comparison of the historical financial results and present financial condition of Visa International with those of other companies that Lehman Brothers deemed relevant;

• a comparison of the financial terms of the restructuring with the financial terms of certain other transactions that Lehman Brothers deemed relevant;

• the strategic transaction alternatives available to reorganize and restructure the whole of the Visa enterprise, as well as Visa U.S.A. on a standalone basis;

• the strategic benefits of the restructuring to the Visa enterprise as a whole and to each of its component entities through, among others things, managing potential antitrust and other litigation exposure, potential cost savings and operational synergies, and the potential impact on the Visa enterprise as a globally managed publicly traded entity;

• the accounting treatment of the restructuring on a United States generally accepted accounting principles basis; and

• the relative contributions of the parties to the restructuring to Visa Inc. as compared to the relative pro forma stock ownership in Visa Inc. received by such parties.

In addition, Lehman Brothers had discussions with the managements of Visa International, each Visa region and Inovant concerning their respective businesses, operations, assets, liabilities, financial condition and prospects, and undertook such other studies, analyses and investigations as Lehman Brothers deemed appropriate.

In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information used by Lehman Brothers without assuming any responsibility for independent verification of such information. Lehman Brothers further relied upon the assurances of the managements of Visa International and each Visa region that they were not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the financial projections of Visa International and each Visa region, upon advice of Visa International, Lehman Brothers assumed that such projections were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the managements of Visa International and each Visa region as to the future financial performance of the respective regions and that such regions would perform substantially in accordance with such projections. In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers did not conduct a physical inspection of the properties and facilities of Visa International or any Visa entity and did not make or obtain any evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities of such entities. Lehman Brothers’ opinion necessarily is based upon market, economic and other conditions as they exist on, and can be evaluated as of, the date of such opinion.

In connection with rendering its opinion, Lehman Brothers performed certain financial, comparative and other analyses as described below. In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers did not ascribe a specific range of value to Visa International and each Visa region, but rather made its determination as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the restructuring to Visa International on the basis of financial and comparative analyses. The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial and comparative analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances, and therefore, such an opinion is not readily susceptible to summary description. Furthermore, in arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. Accordingly, Lehman Brothers believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that

53

considering any portion of such analyses and factors, without considering all analyses and factors as a whole, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying its opinion. In its analyses, Lehman Brothers made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Visa International and each Visa region. None of Visa International, any Visa region, Lehman Brothers or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are materially different from those discussed. Any estimates contained in these analyses were not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than as set forth therein. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses actually may be sold.

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses used by Lehman Brothers in connection with providing its opinion to the board of directors of Visa International. Certain of the summaries of financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand the financial analyses used by Lehman Brothers, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Accordingly, the analyses listed in the tables and described below must be considered as a whole. Considering any portion of such analyses and of the factors considered, without considering all analyses and factors, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying Lehman Brothers’ opinion.

Transaction Structure

For a detailed description of the terms and conditions of the restructuring, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement.” From a U.S. GAAP perspective, the restructuring will be treated as an acquisition by Visa U.S.A., the U.S. GAAP acquirer, of the portion of Visa International that it does not currently own, which includes Visa AP, Visa CEMEA, Visa LAC, Visa Canada and Visa Europe, which we refer to collectively as the U.S. GAAP acquirees.

54

The Case for US GAAP Acquirees

U.S. GAAP Acquirees Contribution Analysis

In order to evaluate the aggregate contributions made by the U.S. GAAP acquirees to Visa Inc. pro forma for the restructuring relative to their aggregate pro forma equity ownership in Visa Inc., Lehman Brothers analyzed, based on management projections prepared by each of Visa International, each U.S. GAAP acquiree, and Visa regions: (i) the aggregate contributions of the U.S. GAAP acquirees to estimated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, and net income for the fiscal 2006, 2008 and 2010; and (ii) the aggregate values represented by the U.S. GAAP acquirees as determined by the comparable company analysis, precedent transaction analysis and discounted cash flow analysis, each as described below. Lehman Brothers determined the U.S. GAAP acquiree’s ownership in Visa Inc. pro forma for the restructuring as being the sum of: (i) each of Visa AP’s, Visa LAC’s and Visa CEMEA’s ownership in Visa Inc.; (ii) Visa Europe’s ownership in Visa Inc., plus the non-stock consideration Visa Europe will receive as part of the restructuring, less Visa Europe’s ownership in Inovant; and (iii) Visa Canada’s ownership in Visa Inc., less the value of Visa Canada’s operations, less Visa Canada’s ownership in Inovant. Lehman Brothers calculated the likely minimum ownership held by the U.S. GAAP acquirees in Visa Inc. to be 39.9% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock.

The following table presents the results of this contribution analysis:

Metric	U.S. GAAP Acquiree Contribution		Likely U.S. GAAP Acquiree Minimum Ownership in Visa Inc.
EBITDA
2006	15.3	%	39.9	%
2008	30.1	%	39.9	%
2010	32.1	%	39.9	%
Net Income
2006	10.4	%	39.9	%
2008	30.5	%	39.9	%
2010	32.4	%	39.9	%

Valuation Methodology	U.S. GAAP Acquiree Contribution		Likely U.S. GAAP Acquiree Minimum Ownership in Visa Inc.
Comparable Company
EBITDA
1-Year Forward	23.4	%	39.9	%
2-Year Forward	31.1	%	39.9	%
Net Income
1-Year Forward	23.7	%	39.9	%
2-Year Forward	31.1	%	39.9	%
Precedent Transaction
EBITDA	23.7	%	39.9	%
New Income	31.6	%	39.9	%
Discounted Cash Flow	30.6	%	39.9	%

Lehman Brothers noted that the likely U.S. GAAP acquiree minimum ownership in Visa Inc. was higher than the U.S. GAAP acquiree contribution across all methodologies summarized above. Lehman Brothers also noted that an additional source of value to the U.S. GAAP acquirees is the explicit acknowledgement by Visa U.S.A. member banks of the liability under the loss share agreement.

55

Comparable Company Analysis

In order to assess how the public market values shares of similar publicly traded companies, Lehman Brothers reviewed and compared specific financial and operating data relating to the U.S. GAAP acquirees and the Visa regions with selected companies that Lehman Brothers deemed comparable to the U.S. GAAP acquirees and the Visa regions, including MasterCard, Inc., American Express Co., Total System Services Inc., Checkfree Corp., VeriFone Holdings Inc., Global Payments Inc., Heartland Payment Systems Inc., Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc., NYSE Euronext, NYMEX Holdings Inc., IntercontinentalExchange Inc. and Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. Using publicly available information, Lehman Brothers calculated and analyzed each company’s current stock price to its projected earnings per share (commonly referred to as a price earnings ratio, or P/E) and each company’s enterprise value to EBITDA. The enterprise value of each company was obtained by adding its short and long term debt to the sum of the market value of its common equity, and subtracting its cash and cash equivalents. As of June 8, 2007, the last trading date prior to the delivery of Lehman Brothers’ opinion, the median ratio of the comparable companies’ enterprise value to their respective projected calendar year 2007 EBITDA and calendar year 2008 EBITDA based upon data from I/B/E/S International, Inc. which we refer to as I/B/E/S were 14.8x and 12.7x, respectively. Additionally, the comparable companies’ calendar year 2007 and calendar year 2008 median price earnings ratio based upon data from I/B/E/S were 25.9x and 21.2x, respectively.

Using these multiples and an implied reference range, Lehman Brothers calculated the implied ownership percentages in Visa Inc. to be held by the U.S. GAAP acquirees, as utilized in the contribution analysis described above, based upon 1-year and 2-year forward EBITDA and 1-year and 2-year forward net income values of 23.4%, 31.3%, 23.7% and 31.1%, respectively. Lehman Brothers noted that for the likely U.S. GAAP acquirees, minimum ownership in Visa Inc. was above all these implied ownership percentages.

Lehman Brothers selected the comparable companies above because their business and operating profiles are reasonably similar to those of the U.S. GAAP acquirees and the Visa regions. However, because of the inherent differences between the business, operations and prospects of the U.S. GAAP acquirees and the business, operations and prospects of the companies included in the comparable companies, Lehman Brothers believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the comparable company analysis and accordingly also made qualitative judgments concerning differences between the financial and operating characteristics and prospects of the U.S. GAAP acquirees and the companies included in the comparable company analysis that would affect the public trading values of each. These qualitative judgments related primarily to the differing sizes, growth prospects, profitability levels and degrees of operational risk between the U.S. GAAP acquirees and the comparable companies.

56

Comparable Transaction Analysis

Using publicly available information, Lehman Brothers reviewed and analyzed the multiples of enterprise value to last twelve month, or LTM, EBITDA and to earnings per share in selected transactions for financial and payment processing, financial exchange and credit card companies. Lehman Brothers reviewed the following transactions:

Date Announced	Acquirer	Target
5/17/07	The Blackstone Group LP	Alliance Data Systems Corp.
4/30/07	Deutsche Borse AG / SWX Group	International Securities Exchange Holdings, Inc.
4/2/07	Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.	First Data Corp.
11/30/06	Intuit	Digital Insight Corp.
10/27/06	Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc.	Chicago Board of Trade
6/1/06	NYSE Group Inc.	Euronext NV
5/31/06	Thomas H. Lee Partners	West Corp
4/21/06	ICAP Plc	EBS Group Ltd.
4/10/06	VeriFone Holdings Inc.	Lipman Electronic
3/27/06	Australian Stock Exchange	SFE Corp. Ltd.
12/27/05	iPayment Inc.	iPayment Holdings Inc.
9/15/05	Fidelity National Information Services Inc.	Certegy Inc.
8/4/05	HSBC Finance Corp.	Metris Companies Inc.
7/28/05	The Carlyle Group	SS&C Technologies Inc.
6/30/05	Bank of America Corp.	MBNA Corp.
6/6/05	Washington Mutual	Providian Financial Corp.
4/22/05	The NASDAQ Stock Market Inc., Silver Lake Partners, Bank of New York Co. Inc.	Instinet Group, Inc.
4/20/05	NYSE Group Inc.	Archipelago Holdings Inc.
3/28/05	Private Equity Consortium	SunGard Data Systems Inc.
7/13/04	Bank of America Corp.	National Processing Inc.
6/8/04	Thomas H. Lee Partners LP	Refco Group Ltd. LLC
4/6/04	Morgan Stanley	Barra Inc.
4/2/03	First Data Corp.	Concord EFS Inc.
1/23/03	Collins Stewart Holding PLC	Tullett PLC
1/8/03	Bank of New York Co. Inc.	Pershing LLC
11/14/02	HSBC Holdings PLC	Household International Inc.
5/7/01	U.S. Bancorp	Nova Corp.
9/6/00	Citigroup Inc.	Associates First Capital Corp.
3/22/99	First Data Corp.	Paymentech Inc.
11/23/98	Concord EFS Inc.	Electronic Payment Services
6/18/98	Nova Corp.	PMT Services, Inc.
10/27/97	Fleet Financial Group Inc.	Advanta Corp.
1/19/97	Bank One Corp.	First U.S.A Inc.

57

As of June 8, 2007, the last trading date prior to the delivery of Lehman Brothers’ opinion, the comparable transaction analysis resulted in a median ratio of enterprise value to LTM EBITDA of 10.8x and a median price earnings ratio of 30.1x.

Using these multiples and an implied reference range, Lehman Brothers calculated the implied ownership percentages in Visa Inc. to be held by the U.S. GAAP acquirees, as utilized in the contribution analysis described above, of 30.6% and 31.6%, respectively. Lehman Brothers noted that for the likely U.S. GAAP acquirees, minimum ownership in Visa Inc. was above all of these implied ownership percentages.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

As part of its analysis, Lehman Brothers prepared a discounted after-tax cash flow model that was based upon financial projections prepared by the management teams of each U.S. GAAP acquiree. A discounted cash flow analysis is a traditional valuation methodology used to derive a valuation of an asset by calculating the “present value” of estimated future cash flows of the asset. “Present value” refers to the current value of future cash flows or amounts and is obtained by discounting those future cash flows or amounts by a selected discount rate. Lehman Brothers performed a discounted cash flow analysis for the U.S. GAAP acquirees as of June 8, 2007 by adding: (i) the present value of the U.S. GAAP acquirees’ after tax unlevered free cash flows for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2011 to (ii) the present value of the “terminal value” of the U.S. GAAP acquirees. “Terminal value” refers to the value of all future cash flows from an asset at a particular point in time. Lehman Brothers estimated a range of terminal values based on multiples of estimated 1-year forward EBITDA of 12.0x to 16.0x. Lehman Brothers then discounted the after tax unlevered free cash flows and the estimated terminal value to a present value at discount rates ranging from 10% to 14% which were chosen based on a weighted average cost of capital analysis.

Based on the projections and assumptions described above (including the midpoint of the terminal value range), Lehman Brothers calculated the implied ownership percentages in Visa Inc. to be held by the U.S. GAAP acquirees, as utilized in the contribution analysis described above, of 32.9%. Lehman Brothers noted that for the likely U.S. GAAP acquirees, minimum ownership in Visa Inc. was above this implied ownership percentage.

The Case for U.S. GAAP Acquirer

VISA U.S.A. Comparative Valuation

Lehman Brothers analyzed the comparative valuations of the strategic alternatives for the U.S. GAAP acquirer, Visa U.S.A., of either (i) becoming a standalone public entity or (ii) entering into the restructuring. For a relative valuation comparison, Lehman Brothers valued Visa U.S.A.’s alternatives based upon MasterCard’s current stock price to its projected calendar year 2008 earnings per share. As of June 8, 2007, the last trading date prior to the delivery of Lehman Brothers’ opinion, MasterCard’s current stock price to its projected calendar year 2008 earnings per share based upon data from I/B/E/S was 25.0x. To appropriately reflect Visa U.S.A.’s standalone financials, Lehman Brothers devised two cases: in the first case, Visa U.S.A.’s standalone net income was adjusted for public company costs and in a second case, Visa U.S.A.’s standalone net income was adjusted for both public company costs and brand/IP royalty license fees to be paid to Visa International. Lehman Brothers used public company costs of $50 million for Visa U.S.A., two-thirds of the value provided by Visa International for Visa Inc.’s pro forma for the restructuring and an initial public offering; and a brand/IP royalty license fee of $143 million, based on Visa Inc./Visa Europe agreements. Lehman Brothers noted that it was uncertain that a standalone Visa U.S.A. could be achieved; but to the extent it could be achieved, a brand/IP royalty license fee would likely be greater than $143 million. The analysis resulted in the following standalone valuations for Visa U.S.A.:

Methodology	Visa U.S.A. Standalone Valuation (in billions)
Case 1	$	21.0
Case 2	$	18.9
Average	$	20.0

58

Additionally, as part of this analysis, Lehman Brothers estimated Visa U.S.A.’s share in the value of Visa Inc. based upon two scenarios. Visa U.S.A.’s share of value in Visa Inc. was determined by applying Visa U.S.A.’s percentage ownership to the overall Visa Inc. value, and not giving effect to the true-up. In the base case, a valuation multiple of 25.0x (the same used in Visa U.S.A.’s standalone public valuation) was applied to Visa Inc.’s GAAP and cash net income (excluding amortization of intangibles and restructuring costs created as a direct result from the restructuring). In the upside case, Lehman Brothers estimated Visa U.S.A.’s share in the value of Visa Inc. at a premium to the standalone valuation of Visa U.S.A. due to its larger scale, growth profile and geographic footprint.

Lehman Brothers applied a price earnings ratio range of 25.0x – 28.0x 2008 GAAP and Cash Net Income. The analysis resulted in a range of values for Visa Inc. of $33.9 billion to $42.3 billion. The Visa U.S.A. share in the value of Visa Inc. resulted in a range of values of $19.4 billion to $24.1 billion. Lehman Brothers noted that Visa U.S.A.’s share in the value of Visa Inc. was higher than the Visa U.S.A. standalone valuation in all but one methodology.

Other

The underlying analyses of Lehman Brothers’ opinion must be considered as a whole. Each component, the case for the U.S. GAAP acquirees and the case for the U.S. GAAP acquirer, indicates the restructuring is fair from a financial point of view. Taken as a sum of the parts, the restructuring is fair to Visa International and its constituent members taken as a whole.

Engagement of Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and, as part of its investment banking activities, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive bids, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes. The board of directors of Visa International selected Lehman Brothers because of its expertise, reputation and familiarity with Visa International and the technology services industry generally and because its investment banking professionals have substantial experience in transactions comparable to the restructuring.

As compensation for its services in connection with the restructuring, Visa International paid Lehman Brothers $5.5 million upon the delivery of Lehman Brothers’ opinion. In addition, Visa International paid Lehman Brothers a quarterly retainer fee, which began effective as of April 2006, the date upon which Lehman Brothers initiated work with Visa International. Additional compensation may be paid to Lehman Brothers by Visa International in its sole discretion based on Visa International’s evaluation of the services provided by Lehman Brothers. In addition, Visa International has agreed to reimburse Lehman Brothers for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the restructuring and to indemnify Lehman Brothers for certain liabilities that may arise out of its engagement by Visa International and the rendering of Lehman Brothers’ opinion. Lehman Brothers has performed investment banking services for Visa International in the past, and expects to continue to provide such services in the future to Visa International and its affiliates, and has received, and expects to receive, customary compensation for such services.

Opinion of Visa U.S.A.’s Financial Advisor

In December 2005, Greenhill & Co., LLC was retained for the benefit of Visa U.S.A. to provide financial advisory services and to render an opinion to Visa U.S.A.’s regional board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the shares of class USA common stock of Visa Inc. to be received by the members of Visa U.S.A. in connection with the restructuring (which shares, for the purposes of this description of Greenhill’s opinion, are referred to as the Visa U.S.A. consideration). Pursuant to the restructuring agreement, Visa U.S.A.’s ownership in Visa Inc. following the restructuring will be 57.1% (not including certain shares issued to Visa Europe that will be redeemed for $1.146 billion), subject to adjustment as provided in the restructuring

59

agreement. On June 7, 2007, Greenhill rendered its oral opinion (subsequently confirmed in writing), to Visa U.S.A.’s regional board of directors, that, as of that date and based upon and subject to the limitations and assumptions stated in its opinion, the Visa U.S.A. consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to the members of Visa U.S.A.

Greenhill’s opinion was directed to, and provided for the use and benefit of, Visa U.S.A.’s regional board of directors in connection with its consideration of the restructuring. Greenhill did not recommend to Visa U.S.A. any specific amount or form of consideration or advise Visa U.S.A. that the amount or form of consideration provided in the restructuring agreement constituted the only appropriate amount or form of consideration for the proposed restructuring.

The full text of Greenhill’s written opinion, dated June 7, 2007, is attached as Annex F to this proxy statement-prospectus. Greenhill’s opinion relates only to the fairness, as of the date of the opinion and from a financial point of view, to the members of Visa U.S.A. of the Visa U.S.A. consideration, does not address any other aspect of the restructuring or any related transaction, and does not constitute a recommendation to Visa U.S.A.’s regional board of directors or to any member of Visa U.S.A. whether such board of directors or the members should approve the restructuring or any other transaction. Greenhill was not requested to and did not solicit any expressions of interest from any other parties with respect to the restructuring or any other alternative transaction. Greenhill was not requested to opine to, and Greenhill’s opinion did not in any manner address, the underlying business decision by Visa U.S.A. to proceed with or effect the restructuring or any other transaction. The summary of Greenhill’s opinion that follows is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. You are urged to read the opinion carefully and in its entirety to learn about the assumptions made, general procedures followed, matters considered and limits on the scope of the review undertaken by Greenhill in rendering its opinion.

In arriving at its opinion, Greenhill, among other things:

• reviewed the draft restructuring agreement as of June 2, 2007 and certain related documents;

• reviewed certain information, including financial forecasts and other financial and operating data concerning Visa International, Inovant and the Visa regions, prepared for each of Visa International, Inovant and such Visa regions by the management of each;

• analyzed certain information, including financial forecasts and other financial and operating data concerning the pro forma combined company resulting from the restructuring, prepared by the managements of Visa International, Inovant and the Visa regions (for purposes of this description of Greenhill’s opinion, such information is referred to as the pro forma information);

• reviewed information regarding the strategic, financial and operational benefits anticipated from the restructuring, prepared by the managements of Visa International, Inovant and Visa regions (for purposes of this description of Greenhill’s opinion, such information is referred to as the synergies);

• discussed the past and present operations and financial condition and the prospects with senior executives of each of Visa International, Inovant and the Visa regions;

• compared the value of the Visa U.S.A. consideration with the relative contribution of Visa U.S.A. to Visa Inc. based on a number of metrics that Greenhill deemed relevant;

• compared the value of the Visa U.S.A. consideration with that received in certain publicly available transactions that Greenhill deemed relevant;

• performed discounted cash flow analyses for Visa U.S.A. and Visa Inc.;

• considered the trading valuations of certain publicly traded companies that Greenhill deemed relevant; and

• performed such other analyses and considered such other factors as Greenhill deemed appropriate.

60

Greenhill also held discussions with Visa U.S.A.’s board of directors and Visa U.S.A.’s legal counsel to discuss the restructuring and the results of Greenhill’s analysis and examination, and considered such other matters that it deemed relevant to its inquiry.

In conducting its review and analysis and rendering its opinion, Greenhill assumed and relied upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the information publicly available or supplied or otherwise made available to it by representatives and managements of the Visa regions for the purposes of its opinion and further relied upon the assurances of the representatives and managements of Visa International, Inovant and the Visa regions that they were not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the financial forecasts and projections of the Visa regions, the pro forma information, the synergies and other data with respect to Visa International, Inovant and the Visa regions that have been furnished or otherwise provided to it, Greenhill assumed that they were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best then available estimates and good faith judgments of the managements of the Visa regions as to those matters, and relied upon such forecasts, projections, pro forma information, synergies and other data in arriving at its opinion. Greenhill also assumed that, following the restructuring, Visa Inc. will fully realize the anticipated benefits of the synergies. Greenhill expressed no opinion with respect to such forecasts, projections, pro forma information, synergies and other data or the assumptions upon which they are based. Greenhill assumed that the restructuring will be consummated in accordance with the terms set forth in the final, executed restructuring agreement, which Greenhill further assumed will be identical in all material respects to the latest draft thereof Greenhill reviewed, and without waiver of any material terms or conditions set forth in the restructuring agreement. Greenhill further assumed that all material governmental, regulatory and other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the restructuring will be obtained without any effect on the Visa regions, Visa Inc. or the restructuring meaningful to Greenhill’s analysis.

Greenhill did not make any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of the Visa regions, nor was Greenhill furnished with any such valuations or appraisals. Greenhill’s opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to Greenhill as of, the date of its opinion. Greenhill’s opinion noted that subsequent developments may affect its opinion and Greenhill does not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm its opinion. With respect to the quantitative information, to the extent that it is based on market data, such information is based on market data as it existed on or before June 7, 2007, and is not necessarily indicative of current market conditions.

In connection with its review and analysis and rendering its opinion, Greenhill performed a number of analyses. Set forth below is a summary of the material financial analyses performed and material factors considered by Greenhill to arrive at its opinion. Greenhill performed certain procedures, including each of the financial analyses described below, and reviewed with Visa U.S.A.’s regional board of directors and the senior management of Visa U.S.A. the assumptions upon which these analyses were based, as well as other factors. Although this summary describes the material analyses made by Greenhill in arriving at its opinion, it does not purport to describe all of the analyses performed or factors considered by Greenhill in this regard.

In connection with certain of the analyses discussed below, Greenhill selected a group of payment processing companies that engage in businesses reasonably comparable to those of Visa U.S.A. and Visa Inc. None of the selected companies is identical to Visa U.S.A. or Visa Inc. Accordingly, Greenhill’s analysis of the selected payment processing companies necessarily involved complex considerations and judgments concerning the differences in financial and operating characteristics and other factors that would necessarily affect the analysis of the operating statistics, trading multiples and other financial ratios and valuations of the selected payment processing companies.

The preparation of an opinion regarding fairness is a complex analytic process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances, and, therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. The preparation of an opinion regarding fairness does not involve a

61

mathematical evaluation or weighing of the results of the individual analyses performed, but requires Greenhill to exercise its professional judgment, based on its experience and expertise, in considering a wide variety of analyses taken as a whole. Each of the analyses conducted by Greenhill was carried out in order to provide a different perspective on the financial terms of the proposed restructuring and add to the total mix of information available. Greenhill did not form a conclusion as to whether any individual analysis, considered in isolation, supported or failed to support an opinion about the fairness of the Visa U.S.A. consideration. Rather, in reaching its conclusion, Greenhill considered the results of the analyses in light of each other and ultimately reached its opinion based on the results of all analyses taken as a whole. Greenhill did not place particular reliance or weight on any particular analysis (and the order of analyses described below does not represent their relative importance or weight), but instead concluded that its analyses, taken as a whole, provided the basis for its determination. Accordingly, notwithstanding the separate factors summarized below, Greenhill believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and the factors considered by it, without considering all analyses and factors, would create an incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying its opinion. No company used in the below analyses as a comparison is directly comparable to Visa U.S.A. or Visa Inc. In performing its analyses, Greenhill made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, business and economic conditions and other matters. Because the analyses performed by Greenhill are inherently subject to uncertainty, and are based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or their respective advisors, these analyses are not necessarily indicative of future actual values or results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these analyses. Consequently, none of Visa U.S.A., Greenhill or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are materially different from those suggested by these analyses.

Greenhill analyzed certain financial data on a pro forma basis for Visa Inc. as a combined company following an assumed initial public offering of shares of Visa Inc. For the purposes of this pro forma analysis Greenhill assumed, among other things, the realization of the benefit of 50% of the projected synergies by 2008 and 100% by 2009.

Comparable Company Analyses. Greenhill reviewed the price to earnings ratios, or trading multiples, principally focusing on the following payment processing companies:

•     MasterCard	•     First Data
•     Global Payments	•     eFunds
•     Total Systems	•     MoneyGram
•     Alliance Data Systems	•     Euronet

All multiples were based on closing stock prices on May 25, 2007, except for First Data (for which it was April 3, 2007) and Alliance Data Systems (for which is it was May 15, 2007), in each case one day prior to the announcement of their proposed acquisition, and estimated earnings for the years 2007 and 2008. Estimated financial data for the payment processing companies were based on consensus estimates compiled by I/B/E/S. Estimated financial data for Visa U.S.A. were based on internal estimates of Visa U.S.A.’s management, and estimated financial data for Visa Inc. were based on internal estimates of Visa International, Inovant and the Visa regions’ managements, in each case as provided to Greenhill.

Based on the assumption that 2008 would be the first year in which each business will operate on the model of an independent publicly traded company, Greenhill reviewed certain statistics of selected companies primarily for 2008. Greenhill reviewed the trading multiples for the selected companies, which ranged from 16.0x to 27.8x, with a median of 21.4x. However, Greenhill determined in its professional judgment that the company most comparable to Visa U.S.A. is MasterCard, which has a trading multiple of 27.8x (adjusted to reflect certain assumptions regarding its litigation liabilities), and therefore concluded it would be appropriate to apply a range of multiples from 26.0x to 28.0x to corresponding financial data of Visa U.S.A. Greenhill also determined in its professional judgment that the company most comparable to Visa Inc. is also MasterCard, and that Visa Inc.

62

should trade at a premium to MasterCard based, among other things, on a review of medium-term growth rates, profit margins and competitive market position. Greenhill therefore concluded it would be appropriate to apply a range of multiples from 29.0x to 31.0x to corresponding financial data of Visa Inc. This analysis indicated a value for Visa U.S.A. that would equate to a range of percentage ownership of Visa Inc. for Visa U.S.A. of 52.8% to 53.1%.

Greenhill also analyzed 2008 ratios of enterprise value to 2008 estimated EBITDA for the selected companies, which ranged from 8.9x to 15.5x. Based on its professional judgment that the company most comparable to Visa U.S.A. and Visa Inc. is MasterCard, which has a ratio of 15.5x (as adjusted), Greenhill then applied a range of ratios from 14.5x to 15.5x to corresponding financial data of Visa U.S.A. and a range of ratios from 15.0x to 16.0x to corresponding financial data of Visa Inc. This analysis indicated a value for Visa U.S.A. that would equate to a range of percentage ownership of Visa Inc. for Visa U.S.A. of 54.7% to 54.9%.

Discounted Cash Flow Analyses

Using discounted cash flow methodology, Greenhill calculated the present values of the estimated future operating free cash flows for Visa U.S.A., using the estimates prepared by Visa U.S.A.’s management, and the present values of the estimated future operating free cash flows for Visa Inc., using the estimates prepared by the managements of Visa International, Inovant and the Visa regions. In this analysis, Greenhill assumed discount rates ranging from 10.4% to 11.4% for Visa U.S.A. and from 10.4% to 11.4% for Visa Inc., and terminal trading multiples ranging from 12.0x to 14.0x for Visa U.S.A. and from 13.0x to 15.0x for Visa Inc. (in each case for terminal year earnings in 2010), which imply nominal terminal growth rates of 5.3% to 7.0% for Visa U.S.A. and 6.8% to 8.3% for Visa Inc. Greenhill determined the appropriate discount rate ranges based upon an analysis of the average cost of capital for selected payment processing companies. Greenhill selected the terminal trading multiples for Visa U.S.A. and Visa Inc. that it deemed appropriate based on its expertise and judgment. The discounted cash flow analyses indicated a value for Visa U.S.A. that would equate to a range of percentage ownership of Visa Inc. for Visa U.S.A. of 52.0% to 52.2%.

Contribution Analysis

Pursuant to the restructuring agreement, Visa U.S.A.’s net ownership in Visa Inc. following the restructuring will be 57.1% (not including certain shares issued to Visa Europe that will be redeemed for $1.146 billion), subject to certain adjustments as provided in the global restructuring agreement.

Greenhill also performed an analysis of the relative contribution of Visa U.S.A. to 2008 estimated net income of Visa Inc. compared to the contributions of the other Visa regions being combined in the restructuring to 2008 estimated net income of Visa Inc. The net income figures used in this analysis incorporated the licensing fee paid or payable by Visa Europe to Visa Inc. and excluded the realization of any benefit of the synergies. This analysis was based on financial projections provided by the management of Visa U.S.A. and such other Visa regions. Based on this analysis, Visa U.S.A.’s projected 2008 estimated net income contribution was 61.9%.

Compared to the 57.1% ownership interest for Visa U.S.A. set forth in the restructuring agreement, the 61.9% projected contribution to 2008 estimated net income represents an implied premium of 12.6% to be received in the restructuring by the Visa regions other Visa U.S.A. Greenhill analyzed the value of the potential synergies for Visa Inc. and considered the potential for higher trading multiples for Visa Inc. and determined, in its judgment, that the cost of the implied premium should be more than offset by the value of the synergies and potential for higher trading multiples at Visa Inc.

Greenhill also performed an analysis of global merger-of-equals transactions from January 1, 2002 through 2007 and found that the average premium paid based on trading prices one day, one week, and one month prior to announcement ranged from 10.2% to 10.7% (all industries) and from 13.7% to 15.8% (financial services industry). Greenhill determined that the merger of Visa U.S.A. with the other Visa entities to create Visa Inc. had many characteristics comparable to precedent global merger-of-equals transactions.

63

Engagement of Greenhill

Visa U.S.A. hired Greenhill based on its qualifications and expertise in providing financial advice to companies and on its reputation as a nationally recognized investment banking firm. Greenhill had no prior material relationship with Visa U.S.A. Pursuant to its engagement letter, Greenhill will receive a fee from Visa U.S.A., a portion of which is contingent on the consummation of the restructuring or another comparable transaction. In addition, Visa U.S.A. has agreed to reimburse Greenhill for certain out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it in connection with its engagement and will indemnify Greenhill against certain liabilities that may arise out of its engagement, including certain liabilities under federal securities laws.

Greenhill also provided financial and modeling support to Visa International during 2006, for which Greenhill was separately compensated by Visa International. Greenhill is also providing advisory services to Visa International in relation to a future public offering of Visa Inc. Amounts payable for those advisory services will be paid by Visa Inc. following completion of the restructuring.

Opinion of Visa Canada’s Financial Advisor

In April 2007, Visa Canada’s board of directors retained Dundee Securities Corporation, which we refer to as Dundee, to provide financial advisory services and a financial fairness opinion in connection with Visa Canada’s participation in the restructuring and the potential subsequent initial public offering by Visa Inc. At the meeting of Visa Canada’s board of directors on May 31, 2007, Dundee rendered its written opinion that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the various conditions set forth in such opinion, the consideration to be received by the Visa Canada members pursuant to the restructuring agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to such members.

The full text of Dundee’s written opinion, dated May 31, 2007, is attached as Annex G to this proxy statement-prospectus. Dundee’s opinion is directed to Visa Canada’s board of directors and addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be received by Visa Canada members under the restructuring, as of the date of the opinion. Dundee has not been asked to render an updated fairness opinion. Such opinion does not address any other aspect of the restructuring and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder or member of Visa Canada as to whether such members or shareholders should approve the restructuring or any other transaction. The summary of Dundee’s opinion set forth in this proxy statement-prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, general procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by Dundee in rendering its opinion. We encourage you to read Dundee’s entire opinion carefully and in full.

In arriving at its opinion, Dundee, among other things:

• reviewed certain historical financial statements and other business and financial information of Visa Canada and Visa Inc.;

• reviewed certain forecasted financial information and other financial and operating data concerning Visa Canada and Visa Inc. that were prepared by our management and management of Visa Inc. and the various Visa regions;

• discussed the past and current operations and financial condition and the prospects of Visa Canada with members of Visa Canada’s management and that of Visa Inc.;

• compared the financial performance and forecasts of each of Visa Canada and Visa Inc. with those of certain comparable publicly traded companies;

• reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available, of certain comparable acquisition transactions;

• reviewed the restructuring agreement and various commercial agreements to be entered into by Visa Canada, Visa Inc. and various other parties in connection with the restructuring;

64

• relied upon the views of Visa Canada’s and Visa Inc.’s management concerning the business, operational and strategic benefits and implications of the restructuring and potential initial public offering, including financial forecasts provided to Dundee relating to the synergistic values and operating cost savings expected to be achieved through the restructuring and potential initial public offering; and

• performed such other analyses and considered such other factors as Dundee deemed appropriate.

In rendering its opinion, Dundee assumed and relied upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the information reviewed by it for the purposes of its opinion. With respect to the financial forecasts, Dundee assumed that they were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best then-currently available estimates and judgments of future financial performance.

Dundee did not make, and does not assume any responsibility for making, any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Visa Canada, nor was it furnished with any such appraisals. Dundee assumed, with the consent of Visa Canada’s board of directors, that the restructuring would be consummated in accordance with its terms, without waiver, modification, or amendment of any material term, condition, or agreement, and in the course of obtaining the necessary governmental or third party approvals, consents, and releases for the restructuring, no delay, limitation, restriction, or condition will be imposed that would have a material adverse effect on Visa Canada or Visa Inc. or materially reduce the contemplated benefits of the restructuring. Representatives of Visa Canada advised Dundee, and Dundee further assumed that the final terms of the restructuring agreement would not vary materially from those set forth in the drafts reviewed by Dundee. In addition, Visa Canada instructed Dundee not to, and, accordingly, for purposes of rendering its opinion, Dundee did not, analyze the tax treatment and resulting implications of the consideration to be received by Visa Canada members.

Dundee’s opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions in effect on, and the information made available to it as of, May 31, 2007.

Dundee did not express any formal opinion as to the actual value of Visa Inc. common stock following the completion of the restructuring or the prices at which Visa Inc. common stock would trade at any time. Dundee did however apply an indicative range of values for the equity value of Visa Inc. upon an initial public offering, with guidance from Visa Canada’s management, as this value in combination with Visa Canada’s estimated 2.8% ownership position in Visa Inc. was used to infer an indicative range of values for the consideration offered to Visa Canada members in the restructuring.

Financial Analyses

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by Dundee in evaluating the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration offered to Visa Canada members by Visa Inc. in the restructuring. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of the financial analyses performed by Dundee, nor does the order of analyses described represent relative importance or weight given to those analyses by Dundee.

Some of the summaries of financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. The tables must be read together with the full text of each summary and are alone not a complete description of the financial analyses performed by Dundee. Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is based on market data as it existed on or before May 31, 2007, and is not necessarily indicative of current or future market conditions. In conducting its financial analysis and evaluation of the financial merits of the restructuring and proposed initial public offering, Dundee noted the expected change in structure of Visa Canada to a for-profit entity, and gave particular emphasis to the estimated financial information for fiscal 2008 of Visa Canada and Visa Inc.

65

For the purposes of evaluating the fairness of the consideration offered to Visa Canada members in the restructuring, Dundee considered a range of various valuation multiples and implied values for the consideration offered to Visa Canada members in the restructuring, as adjusted under the true-up provisions of the restructuring agreement, and Visa Canada as a standalone, for-profit entity. For the purposes of this description of Dundee’s opinion, such standalone, for-profit entity is referred to as Visa Canada standalone. These calculations were primarily based on various forecasts for Visa Canada and Visa Inc., certain financial analyses and a corresponding estimate of applicable ranges of valuation multiples, as well as the draft terms of the restructuring agreement.

Dundee made a number of assumptions, in consultation with Visa Canada’s management, on Visa Canada standalone’s projected financial performance and its ability to operate in the future as if it had participated in the restructuring and not the subsequent merger or amalgamation with Visa Inc.

Transaction Overview and Indicated Transaction Percentage Ownership

Dundee reviewed with Visa Canada’s board of directors the basic terms of the restructuring, including the pro forma percentage ownership by current Visa Canada members of 2.9% of the outstanding common stock of Visa Inc. under the restructuring agreement and Dundee’s current estimate, based on year-to-date results, that such percentage will be adjusted to approximately 2.8% under certain provisions of the restructuring agreement following completion of the restructuring and prior to the proposed initial public offering of securities of Visa Inc.

Furthermore, in evaluating the value of Visa Canada standalone, Dundee ascribed value to Visa Canada’s ownership interest in Inovant and Visa Worldwide Services, derived by applying a net income multiple to the net income attributable to such ownership interest, and the synergies attributable to Visa Canada from such two entities following the restructuring.

Selected Companies Analysis

Dundee reviewed and compared certain financial information for each of Visa Canada and Visa Inc. to corresponding financial information, ratios and public market multiples for selected publicly traded companies that Dundee considered appropriate. The financial information used by Dundee for all companies in the course of this analysis was based on publicly available information as of May 31, 2007 and analyst estimates calculated by Thomson First Call Consensus Estimates, Thomson I/B/E/S Global Detail Estimates, Reuters Estimates, and public filings. The multiples and ratios for each of the selected companies were based on the most recent publicly available information.

For Dundee’s analysis of Visa Canada standalone and Visa Inc., the selected companies forming the comparison group were Fiserv Inc., Automatic Data Processing Inc., Global Payments Inc., Total System Services Inc., Alliance Data Systems Corp., Moneygram International Inc., eFunds Corp., Emergis Inc. and Mastercard Inc. For comparison, Dundee calculated for each member of such group as at May 31, 2007 the ratio of closing stock price to trailing twelve-month and calendar year 2007 and 2008 earnings estimates and the ratios of enterprise value (calculated as equity value plus debt, less cash and cash equivalents) to the trailing twelve-month and calendar year 2007 and 2008 estimated EBITDA. Dundee then estimated a range of applicable valuation ratios for each of Visa Canada standalone and Visa Inc. and applied such multiples to management’s projections to determine an estimated indicative range of equity values.

66

The analysis showed the following median ratios for the companies in such comparison group:

	Selected Company Mean Share Price               / Earnings per Share
Last twelve months earnings per share	25.0x
2007 estimated earnings per share	23.4x
2008 estimated earnings per share	20.3x
	Selected Company Mean Share       Enterprise Value / EBTIDA
Last twelve months EBITDA	12.3x
2007 estimated EBITDA	11.7x
2008 estimated EBITDA	10.5x

Dundee derived an indicative range of applicable valuation multiples and of equity values for Visa Canada standalone based on Dundee’s knowledge and understanding of the trading characteristics for the individual companies within the comparison group and based upon fiscal 2008 estimates for net income and EBITDA of Visa Canada provided by management, as well as characteristics of Visa Canada standalone including, but not limited to, market position, quality of earnings, growth potential, non-cash charges related to intangibles, geographic limitations, product offerings, margins, scale, customer concentration, the market for public securities, market capitalization and such other items as Dundee deemed relevant. This indicative range of values was based upon a ratio of 15.6x to 24.0x for equity value / 2008E fiscal earnings, and 9.9x to 15.2x enterprise value / estimated fiscal 2008 EBITDA.

For comparison, using parameters similar to those outlined above, Dundee also derived an indicative range of applicable valuation multiples and equity values for the consideration offered to Visa Canada members. Dundee used the same group of comparable companies, and based its conclusions in part upon forecasts for 2008 net income and EBITDA for Visa Inc. provided by management, as well as characteristics of Visa Inc., including, but not limited to, market position, quality of earnings, growth potential, non-cash charges related to intangibles, geographic limitations, product offerings, margins, scale, customer concentration, the market for public securities in the United States and globally, market capitalization and such other items as Dundee deemed relevant. Such indicative range of equity values for the consideration offered to Visa Canada members in the restructuring, as adjusted under the true-up provisions of the restructuring agreement, was further derived based upon Visa Canada’s proposed percentage ownership of Visa Inc. and ranges of multiples for Visa Inc. of 24.0x to 32.0x for equity value / estimated fiscal 2008 earnings, and 12.0x to 16.0x enterprise value / estimated fiscal 2008 EBITDA.

Dundee derived an indicative range of equity values of the consideration offered to Visa Canada members in the restructuring, as adjusted under the true-up provisions of the restructuring agreement, which range of equity values implied a ratio of 23.2x to 33.6x for equity value / estimated fiscal 2008 earnings, and 14.0x to 20.2x enterprise value / estimated fiscal 2008 EBITDA based upon management’s forecasts for Visa Canada standalone.

None of the companies included in the comparison group are identical to Visa Canada standalone or Visa Inc. Accordingly, Dundee believes the analysis of publicly traded companies is not simply mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and qualitative judgments, reflected in Dundee’s opinion, concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the selected companies and other factors that could affect the public trading value of such companies.

Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis

Dundee analyzed certain information relating to selected transactions in the transaction processing and services industry since January 1, 2003. The precedent transactions analyzed were:

• Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. / First Data Corporation, in progress

67

• Equifax Inc. / TALX Corporation, May 2007

• Checkfree Corporation / Carreker Corporation, December 2006

• Palamon Capital Partners / Retail Decisions PLC, September 2006

• Fidelity National Financial / Certegy Inc., February 2006

• Bank of America Corporation / National Processing, Inc., July 2004

• Metavante Corporation / NYCE Corporation, May 2004

• First Data Corporation / Concord EFS Inc., April 2003

With respect to the financial information for the targets involved in such precedent transactions, Dundee relied on information from public filings, company press releases and investor presentations, as well as financial forecasts published by research analysts at the time of the transactions.

For each such selected transaction since January 1, 2003 to the extent applicable, Dundee calculated and compared:

• the transaction value as a multiple of trailing twelve-month, forward calendar year and calendar year +1 estimates of EBITDA, with the mean multiples in the selected precedent transactions being 12.6x, 11.7x, and 11.2x, respectively; and

• the purchase price per share paid for the target entity as a multiple of trailing twelve months earnings per share, forward calendar year and calendar year +1 earnings per share, with the mean multiples in the selected precedent transactions being 24.9x, 23.2x and 21.5x, respectively.

Based on such analysis as well as characteristics of Visa Canada standalone including, but not limited to, market position, quality of earnings, growth potential, non-cash charges related to intangibles, geographic limitations, product offerings, margins, scale, customer concentration, the market for public securities, market capitalization and such other items as Dundee deemed relevant, Dundee determined an indicative range of applicable valuation multiples and equity values for Visa Canada. The valuation range was based on a ratio of 17.9x to 26.1x for equity value / estimated fiscal 2008 earnings, and 11.3x to 16.5x enterprise value / estimated fiscal 2008 EBITDA.

For comparison and in order to determine fairness of the consideration offered to Visa Canada members in the restructuring, as adjusted under the true-up provisions of the restructuring agreement, and using similar parameters as those outlined above, Dundee also derived an indicative range of applicable valuation multiples and equity values for such consideration offered to Visa Canada members, using the same group of precedent transactions; forecasts for 2008 net income; EBITDA for Visa Inc. provided by management; and characteristics of Visa Inc., including, but not limited to, market position, quality of earnings, growth potential, non-cash charges related to intangibles, geographic limitations, product offerings, margins, scale, customer concentration, the market for public securities in the United States, market capitalization and such other items as Dundee deemed relevant. Such indicative range of equity values for such consideration was also derived based upon the Visa Canada members’ proposed percentage ownership of Visa Inc. and ranges of multiples for Visa Inc. of 27.0x to 31.0x for equity value / estimated fiscal 2008 earnings, and 13.0x to 17.0x for enterprise value / estimated fiscal 2008 EBITDA.

Dundee also derived an indicative range of equity values of the consideration offered to Visa Canada members in the restructuring, as adjusted under the true-up provisions of the restructuring agreement, that implied a ratio of 25.3x to 33.4x for equity value / 2008E fiscal year earnings, and 15.2x to 20.1x for enterprise value / estimated fiscal 2008 EBITDA, based upon management’s forecasts for Visa Canada standalone.

Because the reasons for, and circumstances surrounding, each of the selected precedent transactions analyzed were so diverse, and due to the inherent differences between the operations and financial conditions of the companies involved in such transactions, Dundee believes that a comparable transaction analysis is not

68

simply mathematical. Rather, it involves complex considerations and qualitative judgments, reflected in Dundee’s opinion, concerning differences between the characteristics of these transactions and the restructuring that could affect the values of the subject companies, Visa Canada standalone and Visa Inc.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Dundee performed a discounted cash flow analysis of Visa Canada to determine an indicative range of equity values for Visa Canada standalone prior to the restructuring. Dundee calculated the present value of unlevered free cash flow for fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2010 based upon forecasts provided by management, and added to this amount the present value of Visa Canada’s terminal value at the end of fiscal 2010. Present values were calculated using discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 13.0%, with particular emphasis at 11.0%, which Dundee viewed as appropriate based on a weighted average cost of capital analysis for Visa Canada.

For the Visa Canada standalone analysis, Dundee calculated terminal values using a range of terminal year EBITDA exit multiples of 11.0x to 13.0x; the Visa Canada estimated financial data through 2010 upon which the analysis was based was provided by management of Visa Canada. This analysis showed ranges in implied equity valuations for Visa Canada at a discount rate of 11.0%, 19.6x to 22.2x implied price to earnings range for estimated 2008 net income and 12.4x to 14.1x implied enterprise value to EBITDA Range for estimated 2008 EBITDA.

For comparative purposes, Dundee also calculated terminal values using a perpetual growth in free cash flow method. Terminal growth rates of 3.0% to 5.0% indicated ranges in implied equity valuations for Visa Canada, at a discount rate of 11.0%, 16.7x to 20.9x implied price to earnings range for estimated 2008 net income and 10.6x to 13.3x implied enterprise value to EBITDA range for estimated 2008 EBITDA.

For comparative purposes, Dundee compared the indicative range of applicable valuation multiples and equity values estimated under the discounted cash flow analysis to those estimated for the consideration offered to Visa Canada members in the restructuring, as adjusted under the true-up provisions of the restructuring agreement, under the various other financial analyses.

General

The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving subjective judgments as to the most appropriate methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular facts and circumstances, and therefore is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description.

Dundee made no attempt to assign specific weights to particular analyses or factors considered, but rather made its own qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of all the analyses and factors considered, and determined to give its fairness opinion as described above. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the summary set forth herein, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying the opinion of Dundee.

In arriving at its fairness determination, Dundee considered the results of all of its analyses and did not form any conclusion as to whether any individual analysis, considered in isolation, supported or failed to support an opinion as to fairness from a financial point of view. Rather, Dundee made its determination as to fairness on the basis of its experience and professional judgment after assessing the results of all of its analyses as a whole.

No company or transaction referenced in the above analyses is directly comparable to Visa Canada or the restructuring. Such comparative analyses necessarily involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics, market conditions, and other factors that could affect the public trading of the selected companies or terms of the selected transactions.

69

Dundee prepared the analyses described herein for purposes of providing its opinion to the Visa Canada board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration offered to Visa Canada members in the restructuring.

Because these analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or their respective advisors, none of Visa Canada, Visa Inc., Dundee, or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are materially different from those forecast.

As described above, the opinion of Dundee to Visa Canada’s board of directors was only one of many factors taken into consideration by such board in making its determination to approve the restructuring.

Dundee was not asked to, and did not, recommend the specific consideration payable in the restructuring, which consideration was determined through negotiations among Visa Canada and other entities participating in the restructuring. The summary contained herein does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Dundee in connection with its fairness opinion and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the written opinion of Dundee attached as Annex G. In addition, Visa Canada’s board of directors did not ask Dundee to prepare, nor has Dundee prepared, a valuation of Visa Canada, Visa Inc. or any other entity involved in the restructuring. Dundee’s fairness opinion should not be construed as such.

Engagement of Dundee

Dundee is a recognized Canadian investment banking firm engaged in, among other things, the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, and private placements. Visa Canada’s board of directors selected Dundee as one of its financial advisors in connection with the restructuring and potential initial public offering on the basis of Dundee’s reputation, experience, and familiarity with Visa Canada and the industry.

Dundee in the past has provided services to Visa Canada, for which services Dundee and its affiliates have received customary compensation, including, without limitation, since January 27, 2006, having acted as financial advisor to Visa Canada in its evaluation of strategic alternatives. In return for undertaking the financial analysis of the restructuring and initial public offering and providing a fairness opinion to the board of directors of Visa Canada, Dundee received a fee that is not dependent on the conclusions reached by Dundee in this fairness opinion. Dundee has contracted to be paid a fee for its services as financial advisor to Visa Canada and may be entitled to an additional fee which is contingent upon, amongst other things, consummation of the restructuring and would, if received, represent a substantial portion of the fees received. In addition, Dundee and its affiliates may maintain relationships with Visa Canada, Visa Inc., and their respective affiliates and members.

Opinion of Visa AP’s Financial Advisor

Visa AP’s regional board of directors retained Macquarie (Hong Kong) Limited to provide financial advisory services and a financial fairness opinion to the members of Visa AP and the Visa AP regional board of directors in connection with Visa AP’s participation in the restructuring. On June 7, 2007, Macquarie rendered its fairness opinion to the regional board of directors of Visa AP, that, as of such date, the commercial terms set out in the definitive agreements, in relation to the restructuring agreement, were fair, from a financial point of view, to the Visa AP members.

The full text of Macquarie’s written opinion, dated June 7, 2007, is attached as Annex H to this proxy statement-prospectus. Macquarie’s opinion is directed to Visa AP’s regional board of directors and addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to Visa AP’s members for their participation in the proposed restructuring agreement, as of the date of Macquarie’s opinion. Macquarie’s opinion does not address any other aspect of the restructuring and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder or member of Visa AP. The summary of Macquarie’s opinion set

70

forth in this proxy statement-prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, general procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by Macquarie in rendering its opinion. Macquarie assumes that all regulatory, governmental or other consents or approvals necessary for the consummation of the restructuring will be obtained without any adverse affect on the restructuring agreement. We encourage you to read Macquarie’s entire opinion carefully and in full.

In arriving at its opinion, Macquarie, among other things:

• reviewed the commercial aspects and terms of the restructuring;

• reviewed certain financial and operating information provided by the parties to the restructuring agreement, or consultants or advisors engaged thereby, including, but not limited to, financial projections and anticipated capital requirements;

• reviewed the restructuring documentation known amongst the parties to the restructuring agreement as “Project Atlas-Definition Agreement Supporting Materials”;

• reviewed publicly-available financial data concerning certain other entities in lines of business as it deemed relevant to its analyses; and

• conducted such other financial studies, analyses, and investigations, and considered such other information, as it deemed necessary or appropriate in the course of rendering its opinion.

In rendering its opinion, Macquarie relied upon, among other things, the assurances from the providers of the foregoing information, including Visa AP, that the information was prepared in good faith and on a reasonable basis based on assumptions reflecting the best currently-available estimates and judgments. Actual results that may be achieved by Visa AP may vary materially from the information used in Macquarie’s analyses. In connection with its review, Macquarie has not assumed any responsibility for independent verification of any of the information it reviewed for the purpose of its fairness opinion and has relied on such information being complete and accurate in all material respects. For the purpose of its fairness opinion, Macquarie has not made any independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities, contingent or otherwise, of Visa AP or the other participating regions. Further, Macquarie has not verified the accuracy of any of the representations and warranties made by Visa AP or the other participating regions pursuant to the restructuring agreement.

In rendering its opinion, Macquarie assumed that the restructuring agreement and related agreements, will not be amended, changed or modified in any material aspect and that all parties will comply with their terms. Macquarie’s fairness opinion further assumes that all regulatory, governmental or other consents or approvals necessary for the consummation of the restructuring will be obtained without adverse affect on the restructuring.

Macquarie’s fairness opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary, market, and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to it, as of June 7, 2007. Developments subsequent to June 7, 2007 may affect the fairness opinion, and Macquarie is not under any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its fairness opinion. Any such subsequent developments may or may not support the assumptions relied upon in forming the fairness opinion, though they will not affect the validity of the fairness opinion, which speaks only as of its date.

The following is an abridged summary of select material analyses, and associated elements, performed in connection with the rendering of the Macquarie fairness opinion, and therefore does not reflect the full analyses and the underlying assumptions, qualifications, limitations and other factors and characteristics undertaken by Macquarie in relation to its fairness opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex analytical process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analyses and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to summary description. The underlying aspects of the restructuring agreement are complex and in many instances based on subjective aspects formulated and accepted by the Visa AP and the parties to the

71

restructuring agreement throughout the course of extensive diligence and negotiation. The analyses Macquarie performed are therefore necessarily intricate and draw on a number of subjective or otherwise intuitive elements that are unique to the restructuring.

Macquarie has considered all of its unabridged analyses both jointly and severally in rendering its fairness opinion, and reliance on the summary analyses alone may give rise to an incomplete or misleading view of the fairness opinion and complete supporting analyses. Macquarie has summarized the more material aspects of its analyses and assumptions and the pertinent resulting outcomes. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Macquarie’s financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Macquarie’s financial analyses.

Financial Analyses

Visa AP is an unincorporated region of Visa International. Although Visa AP is not a legal entity, it has enjoyed significant management and board autonomy and functions largely as an independent unit within Visa International. Macquarie’s analysis treats Visa AP as being beneficially owned by its members and quantified as part of the restructuring.

The restructuring agreement proposes that Visa International undergo a 100% change of ownership, with ownership and control shifting to Visa Inc. and consideration being paid to Visa AP members, in the form of Visa Inc. shares and cash at the time of an initial public offering of Visa Inc. Although current Visa AP members will be required to retain shares in Visa Inc., they will not retain only non-equity membership interests in Visa International.

The relative ownership percentages assigned to each of Visa AP and the other regions have been calculated based on an adjusted net income equivalent metric, or NIE, for fiscal 2008. The NIE adjustments flow from a number of elements agreed between the parties that are detailed elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus. This also includes the true-up mechanism designed to adjust the fiscal 2008 net income projections for each of the integrated regions to reflect actual performance as closely, and up to a date as near to the actual initial public offering date, as practicable.

For the purposes of its fairness opinion, Macquarie has considered the restructuring as a sale of Visa AP to Visa Inc. constituting two key and related elements:

• The agreement between participating regions. The participating regions’ members are proposed to exchange their respective membership interests for shares in Visa Inc. on a region-by-region basis in proportion to the negotiated value of each region.

• The agreements with Visa Europe. The participating regions have collectively negotiated certain agreements with Visa Europe. The agreements with Visa Europe have an effect on each of the integrated regions, although the relative impact of the agreement with Visa Europe varies by region.

Macquarie has considered the aggregate effect of these two elements on the financial aspects of the restructuring in formulating its fairness opinion.

The Agreement between the Integrated Regions: Contribution Analysis.

In assessing the fairness of the restructuring agreement to the members of Visa AP, and in particular, the fairness of the restructuring agreement between the integrated regions, Macquarie relied on a contribution analysis of the integrated regions. Two measures of relative contribution were used:

• Fiscal 2008 net income contribution; and

• Discounted cash flow, or DCF, contribution.

72

The table below shows the base, unadjusted 2008 net income contribution of Visa AP at 13.7% and its value contribution, as indicated by DCF analysis, at 14.1%. This is in contrast to the 15.9% stake that Visa AP members will receive in Visa Inc. before any adjustments are made for the true-up, if any.

	Net income contribution (% equity allocation (including Visa Europe))		DCF relative value contribution (%)		Equity allocation (pre-true-up)
U.S.A.	61.4	%	61.5	%	57.1	%
Canada	2.5	%	1.9	%	2.9	%
CEMEA	4.0	%	4.8	%	4.9	%
AP	13.7	%	14.1	%	15.9	%
LAC	10.0	%	9.2	%	10.7	%
Total	91.6	%	91.5	%	91.5	%

Source: The participating regions.

The assumptions utilized in Macquarie’s DCF analysis are as follows:

	Regions
Metric	U.S.	Canada	CEMEA	AP	LAC
Valuation date	31-Mar-07	31-Mar-07	31-Mar-07	31-Mar-07	31-Mar-07
Explicit forecast period	3.5 yrs	3.5 yrs	3.5 yrs	3.5 yrs	3.5 yrs
TV valuation date	30-Sep-10	30-Sep-10	30-Sep-10	30-Sep-10	30-Sep-10
Cost of capital	10%	10%	12%	10%	11%
Terminal EBITDA multiple	13x	13x	13x	13x	13x

Macquarie has assumed for the purposes of indicative ownership, valuation and contribution analyses that Visa Inc. will realize a 21x price to earnings valuation, or P/E valuation, in an initial public offering. However the contribution mechanism agreed between the participating regions results in differential implied P/E valuation for each region. These are set out below assuming a range of different P/E that Visa Inc. may actually realize at an initial public offering.

	Ownership and Implied P/E (pre-true-up)
	Final ownership		Implied PE at 21x for Visa Inc.	Implied PE at 25x for Visa Inc.	Implied PE at 30x for Visa Inc.
U.S.A.	57.1	%	19.5x	23.2x	27.9x
Canada	2.9	%	22.5x	26.8x	32.1x
CEMEA	4.9	%	22.2x	26.5x	31.8x
AP	15.9	%	22.3x	26.5x	31.8x
LAC	10.7	%	22.4x	26.7x	32.0x
Total	91.5	%

Agreements with Visa Europe.

Visa Europe will not become a subsidiary of Visa Inc. and elected to remain a separate entity from Visa Inc.; however, it has had a significant influence on many aspects of the restructuring.

73

Macquarie believes that, from a financial perspective, the main elements of the agreement with Visa Europe are:

1. the financial terms of the agreements between the participating regions and Visa Europe, other than the put-call option agreement, which result in a flow of value to Visa Europe, which we refer to as the incremental global solution value, or IGSV;

2. the proportionality of the IGSV burden on each of the integrated regions; and

3. the put-call option agreement.

Item 1 above effectively constitutes a net value transfer from the participating regions, including Visa AP, to Visa Europe, and item 2 determines each integrated region’s burden of the IGSV.

Macquarie has calculated the IGSV as the value to Visa Inc. of the brand royalties and share of value arising from net income and synergies of Inovant and Visa Worldwide Services, foregone by Visa Europe, less the value to Visa Europe of the class C (series II) redeemable shares ($1.146 billion) and 8.4% of Visa Inc.

Based on price to earning multiples of 21x and 30x for Visa Inc. fiscal 2008 net earnings, Macquarie estimates that for Visa AP, the financial impact of the value transfer from Visa Inc. to Visa Europe is likely to be between 3.8% and 5.0% of Visa AP’s pre-true-up notional value.

Macquarie is of the view that the value transfer to Visa Europe is offset by the benefits accruing to Visa AP through the restructuring. As such, the proportion in which the value transfer is borne by Visa AP as among the other participating regions, viewed in terms of Visa AP’s burden of the IGSV as a percentage of its valuation, is fair.

Macquarie is of the opinion that the put-call option agreement is fair to the Visa AP members when considering the mechanism in its entirety and the likelihood of its exercise, as well as the myriad potential prevailing market conditions at the time of such an exercise. Furthermore, should the call option be exercised, the exercise price will be structured such that there should be no EPS dilution to Visa Inc.

Engagement of Macquarie

Visa AP’s board of directors selected Macquarie based on its qualifications and expertise in providing financial advice to companies and its reputation as an internationally recognized investment banking firm with a strong focus in the Asia-Pacific region. Macquarie had no prior material relationship with Visa AP. As part of the engagement, Macquarie will receive a fee of $4 million from Visa AP, which was contingent on the execution of the restructuring agreement; this fee can be amended by plus/minus $1 million based on an evaluation of the performance of Macquarie. The final fee payable to Macquarie will be determined at a meeting of the Visa AP board of directors in July 2007. In addition, Visa AP agreed to reimburse Macquarie for certain out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the assignment.

Opinion of Visa LAC’s Financial Advisor

On June 8, 2007, Credit Suisse rendered its oral opinion (subsequently confirmed in writing) to Visa LAC’s regional board of directors that, as of such date, the aggregate consideration to be received by the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members pursuant to the restructuring agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members.

The full text of Credit Suisse’s written opinion, dated June 8, 2007, is attached as Annex I to this proxy statement-prospectus. Credit Suisse’s opinion is directed to Visa LAC’s regional board of directors and addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the aggregate consideration to be received by the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members pursuant to the restructuring agreement and did not address any other aspect or implication of the restructuring. Neither Credit Suisse’s opinion nor the

74

summary of its opinion and the related analyses set forth in this proxy statement-prospectus is intended to be, nor does either constitute, advice or a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matter relating to the restructuring. The summary of Credit Suisse’s opinion in this proxy statement-prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Credit Suisse’s written opinion, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, general procedures followed, qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken and other matters considered by Credit Suisse in preparing its opinion. We encourage you to read Credit Suisse’s entire opinion carefully and in full.

In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse, among other things:

• reviewed a draft, dated June 6, 2007, of the restructuring agreement, including drafts of certain documents referenced therein;

• reviewed certain business and financial information relating to Visa Inc., Visa International (including, without limitation, Visa Asia Pacific, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA), Visa U.S.A, Visa Europe, Visa Canada, Inovant and VESI (which collectively are referred to, for purposes of this description of Credit Suisse’s opinion, as the Visa entities);

• reviewed certain other information relating to the Visa entities, including financial forecasts relating to the Visa entities provided to Credit Suisse by the Visa entities;

• had discussions with the managements of Visa International, Visa U.S.A, Visa LAC and certain other Visa entities to discuss the business and prospects of the Visa entities;

• considered certain financial data of the Visa entities, with and without giving effect to the proposed restructuring, and compared that data with similar data for publicly held companies in businesses Credit Suisse deemed similar to the Visa entities;

• considered data with respect to the financial contributions of the Visa entities to the pro forma combined entity resulting from the restructuring; and

• considered such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria which Credit Suisse deemed relevant.

In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not assume any responsibility for the independent verification of any of the foregoing information and relied on it being complete and accurate in all material respects. With respect to the financial forecasts for the Visa entities that Credit Suisse reviewed (with and without giving effect to the proposed restructuring), Credit Suisse was advised, and assumed, that such forecasts for the Visa entities had been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best available estimates and judgments of the managements of the Visa entities as to the future financial performance of the Visa entities with and without giving effect to the proposed restructuring.

Credit Suisse also assumed, with Visa LAC’s consent, that, in the course of obtaining any regulatory or third party consents, approvals or agreements in connection with the restructuring, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition would be imposed that would have an adverse effect on the Visa entities or the contemplated benefits of the restructurings, that the restructuring would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the restructuring agreement without waiver, modification or amendment of any term, condition or agreement thereof, and that the restructuring agreement, when executed, would conform to the draft reviewed by Credit Suisse in all respects material to its analyses. In addition, Credit Suisse was not requested to make, and did not make, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of any of the Visa entities, nor was Credit Suisse furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Credit Suisse’s opinion addressed only the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members of the aggregate consideration to be received by the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members pursuant to the restructuring agreement and did not address the allocation of equity interests in Visa Inc. pursuant to the restructuring as among the members of the Visa entities generally or as among eligible Visa LAC affiliated members in

75

particular, any subsequent adjustments to the aggregate consideration based on the future financial performance of the Visa entities or their successors or otherwise or any other aspect or implication of the restructuring or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with the restructuring or otherwise, or any subsequent securities offerings or other transactions in which Visa Inc. or its affiliates might engage. Credit Suisse’s opinion did not constitute legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance, tax or other similar professional advice and did not address the tax or legal consequences of the restructuring to the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members, Visa LAC, the Visa entities or any other person. With respect to all legal matters, including the covered litigation, Credit Suisse assumed that Visa LAC and the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members would not have any liability with respect to the covered litigation.

For purposes of its analyses and opinion, Credit Suisse, with Visa LAC’s consent, evaluated the fairness from a financial point of view to the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members of the aggregate consideration to be received by the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members pursuant to the restructuring agreement solely on the basis of a comparison of the implied values of Visa LAC and the percentage equity interest in Visa Inc. represented by the aggregate consideration as indicated by Credit Suisse’s financial analyses without application of any minority, illiquidity or other discount or deduction and a comparison of the estimated financial contributions of Visa LAC to Visa Inc. and the percentage equity interest in Visa Inc. represented by the aggregate consideration. Credit Suisse also assumed that all shares of common stock of Visa Inc., regardless of class, have equivalent value. Credit Suisse was advised that upon the completion of the restructuring, Visa Europe will hold 8.4% of the outstanding shares of Visa Inc. common stock and certain additional shares, which (with any additional related shares that may be issued in the future to Visa Europe) are redeemable for $1.146 billion (less any dividends or distribution declared upon such shares) upon the later of one year after the closing of the restructuring or the completion of Visa Inc.’s initial public offering. In performing its analyses Credit Suisse, at Visa LAC’s instruction, gave effect to that redemption. Credit Suisse’s opinion was necessarily based upon information made available to it as of the date of the opinion and financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on the date of the opinion. Credit Suisse did not express any opinion as to what the value of shares in Visa Inc., regardless of class, will be when issued to the members of the Visa entities, including eligible Visa LAC affiliated members, pursuant to the restructuring or the prices at which such securities may be purchased or sold at any time. Credit Suisse’s opinion did not address the relative merits of the restructuring as compared to alternative transactions or strategies that might be available to the Visa entities generally or Visa LAC in particular, nor did it address the underlying business decision of the Visa entities generally or Visa LAC in particular, to proceed with the restructuring.

In preparing its opinion to Visa LAC’s regional board of directors, Credit Suisse performed a variety of analyses, including those described below. The summary of Credit Suisse’s valuation analyses provided below is not a complete description of the analyses underlying Credit Suisse’s fairness opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving various quantitative and qualitative judgments and determinations with respect to the financial, comparative and other analytic methods employed and the adaptation and application of these methods to the unique facts and circumstances presented. As a consequence, neither a fairness opinion nor its underlying analyses is readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Credit Suisse arrived at its opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any individual analysis, analytic method or factor. Accordingly, Credit Suisse believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses, analytic methods and factors, without considering all analyses, analytic methods and factors, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying its analyses and opinion.

In performing its analyses, Credit Suisse considered business, economic, industry and market conditions, financial and otherwise as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, the date of its opinion. No company or business used in Credit Suisse’s analyses for comparative purposes is identical to Visa LAC or Visa Inc. The implied reference range values indicated by Credit Suisse’s analyses are illustrative and not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, any analyses relating to the value of assets, businesses or securities

76

do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold, which may depend on a variety of factors, many of which are beyond Visa LAC’s control and the control of Credit Suisse. Much of the information used in, and accordingly the results of, Credit Suisse’s analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.

Credit Suisse’s opinion and analyses were provided to Visa LAC’s regional board of directors in connection with Visa LAC’s regional board’s consideration of the proposed restructuring and were among many factors considered by Visa LAC’s regional board of directors in evaluating the proposed restructuring. Neither Credit Suisse’s opinion nor its analyses were determinative of the aggregate consideration to be received by the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members pursuant to the restructuring agreement or of the views of Visa LAC’s regional board of directors or management with respect to the restructuring.

Financial Analyses

The following is a summary of the material valuation analyses prepared in connection with Credit Suisse’s opinion rendered on June 8, 2007. The analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the analyses. Considering data in tables without considering the full narrative description of the analyses, as well as the methodologies underlying and the assumptions, qualifications and limitations affecting each analysis, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Credit Suisse’s analyses.

For purposes of its analyses, Credit Suisse reviewed a number of financial metrics including:

• Enterprise Value—generally the value as of a specified date of the relevant company’s outstanding equity securities (taking into account its outstanding options, warrants and convertible securities) plus the value of its net debt (the value of its outstanding indebtedness and capital lease obligations less the amount of cash on its balance sheet), preferred stock and minority interests as of a specified date; and

• EBITDA—generally the amount of the relevant company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization for a specified time period.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, enterprise and per share equity values for MasterCard used in the selected companies analysis described below were calculated using the closing price of MasterCard common stock on May 22, 2007 and financial data for MasterCard as of March 31, 2007. Estimates of 2007 through 2010 revenue, EBITDA and net income for Visa LAC and Visa Inc. were based on estimates provided by the Visa entities. Estimates of 2007 and 2008 EBITDA and net income for MasterCard were based on publicly available research analyst estimates. For purposes of the analysis described below, the multiples implied by the selected companies analysis were adjusted to reflect differences in political risk and growth rates between MasterCard, Visa LAC and Visa Inc.

Selected Companies Analysis. Credit Suisse calculated selected implied multiples of EBITDA and net income for MasterCard and applied an implied range of those multiples to corresponding projected financial data for Visa LAC and Visa Inc.

The calculated multiples included:

• enterprise value as a multiple of estimated 2007 EBITDA;

• enterprise value as a multiple of estimated 2008 EBITDA;

• equity value as a multiple of estimated 2007 net income; and

• equity value as a multiple of estimated 2008 net income.

The selected companies analysis indicated an implied reference range aggregate percentage ownerships of Visa Inc. for the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members of 6.7% to 9.3% as compared to the proposed aggregate percentage ownership resulting from the restructuring of 10.7%.

77

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Credit Suisse also calculated the net present value of Visa LAC’s and Visa Inc.’s unlevered, after-tax free cash flows through 2010 based on estimates provided by the Visa entities. In performing its analysis, Credit Suisse used discount rates ranging from 11.5% to 13.5% for Visa LAC and 10.0% to 12.0% for Visa Inc. based on their respective estimated weighted average cost of capital and terminal value multiples ranging from 11.5x to 12.5x for both Visa LAC and Visa Inc. based on the selected companies analysis. The discounted cash flow analyses indicated an implied reference range aggregate percentage ownerships of Visa Inc. for the eligible Visa LAC affiliated members of 8.4% to 10.7% as compared to the proposed aggregate percentage ownership resulting from the restructuring of 10.7%.

Contribution Analysis. Credit Suisse also reviewed the projected contributions of Visa LAC to Visa Inc.’s projected revenue, EBITDA and net income estimated 2006 and 2007 EBITDA, Net Income. This analysis indicated the following contributions, as compared to the proposed aggregate percentage ownership resulting from the restructuring of 10.7%:

Visa LAC’s Projected Contribution to Visa Inc. 2007 to 2010
	Low		High
Revenue	9.0	%	10.0	%
EBITDA	7.8	%	9.6	%
Net Income	8.2	%	10.0	%

Engagement of Credit Suisse

Credit Suisse is an internationally recognized investment banking and financial advisory firm. Credit Suisse, as part of its investment banking business, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with restructuring and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes. Visa LAC’s board of directors selected Credit Suisse based on Credit Suisse’s qualifications, experience and reputation. Under the terms of Credit Suisse’s engagement, Visa LAC is obligated to pay Credit Suisse fees for its services, portions of which are contingent upon the delivery of Credit Suisse’s opinion and the execution of the restructuring agreement. No portion of Credit Suisse’s fees is contingent upon the consummation of the restructuring. In addition, Visa LAC has agreed to reimburse Credit Suisse for certain expenses and to indemnify Credit Suisse and certain related parties for certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under the federal securities laws, arising out of Credit Suisse’s engagement.

Credit Suisse and its affiliates have in the past provided, and may in the future provide, investment banking and other financial services to Visa entities for which they have received, and would expect to receive, compensation. Credit Suisse is a full service securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and other financial services. In the ordinary course of business, Credit Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for its and its affiliates own accounts and the accounts of customers, securities and financial instruments (including loans and other obligations) of the Visa entities, as well as provide investment banking and other financial services to such companies. One or more affiliates of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC are members of Visa Europe and Visa International.

Opinion of Visa CEMEA’s Financial Advisor

Visa CEMEA’s regional board of directors retained ABN AMRO Corporate Finance Limited, which we refer to as ABN AMRO, to provide financial advisory services and a fairness opinion in connection with the proposal by Visa Inc. to invite the members of Visa CEMEA to exchange their ownership interests in Visa International, ultimately for shares in the capital of Visa Inc., as part of the restructuring under the restructuring agreement. As part of the restructuring, Visa CEMEA and the other participating regions will become wholly owned operating subsidiaries or divisions of Visa Inc. On June 8, 2007, ABN AMRO rendered its oral opinion, which opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing, to Visa CEMEA’s regional board of directors that, as at

78

that date, and subject to the assumptions, qualifications, considerations and limitations set forth in the written opinion, the consideration to be received in the restructuring by the Visa CEMEA members was fair, from a financial point of view, to the Visa CEMEA members.

Pursuant to the terms of the restructuring as set out in a draft of the restructuring agreement dated June 2, 2007, ABN AMRO understood at the date of issuing its fairness opinion that Visa Inc. proposed that members of Visa CEMEA would receive, in the aggregate, an initial allocation of shares representing 4.83% of the share capital of Visa Inc. in exchange for their current aggregate ownership interests in Visa International, which, for purposes of this description of ABN AMRO’s opinion is referred to as the Visa CEMEA consideration.

The full text of ABN AMRO’s written opinion, dated as at June 8, 2007, is attached as Annex J to this proxy statement-prospectus. ABN AMRO’s opinion is directed to Visa CEMEA’s regional board of directors and addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Visa CEMEA consideration to the members of Visa CEMEA and does not address any other issues such as the underlying business decision to effect the restructuring agreement or its commercial merits. ABN AMRO’s opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any Visa CEMEA member or any other person as to whether such members or persons should approve Visa International’s entering into the restructuring agreement in connection with the restructuring. The summary of ABN AMRO’s opinion in this proxy statement-prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of ABN AMRO’s written opinion, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, general procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by ABN AMRO in rendering its opinion. We encourage you to read ABN AMRO’s entire opinion carefully and in full.

In arriving at its opinion, ABN AMRO, among other things:

• reviewed certain business and financial information relating to Visa CEMEA, including the internal management accounts for the three consecutive fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006 and reviewed certain unaudited business and financial information for Visa CEMEA for the quarters ending December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007;

• reviewed certain business and financial information relating to the participating regions, including summaries derived from each participating region’s internal management accounts for the three consecutive fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006 and reviewed certain unaudited business and financial information of the participation regions for the quarters ending December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007;

• reviewed certain internal financial forecasts in respect of the fiscal 2007, and fiscal 2008 to 2010, relating to Visa CEMEA, as prepared by senior management of Visa CEMEA, and discussed them with senior management of Visa CEMEA;

• reviewed certain internal financial forecasts in respect of fiscal 2007, and fiscal 2008 to 2010, relating to the participating regions other than Visa CEMEA, as prepared by senior management of the respective participating regions, and discussed these forecasts with the senior management of the participating regions;

• reviewed internal (historic and projected) pro forma consolidated financial statements of Visa Inc., prepared on the basis of the materials described in the immediately preceding three bullets above, and discussed with Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc. the principal consolidation adjustments and assumed integration synergy benefits intrinsic in their preparation;

• participated in certain discussions with, and reviewed information provided by, the senior management of Visa CEMEA and the other participating regions with respect to the businesses and prospects of Visa CEMEA and the other participating regions;

• reviewed the financial terms of certain transactions that ABN AMRO believed to be comparable to the restructuring;

79

• reviewed public information with respect to certain other companies it believed to be comparable to Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc.;

• reviewed certain documentation prepared by certain of Visa Inc.’s other professional advisors in connection with the restructuring, which ABN AMRO deemed relevant for the purposes of providing its opinion; and

• reviewed those parts of the restructuring agreement and certain other related documents, which ABN AMRO deemed relevant for the purposes of providing its opinion.

ABN AMRO assumed and relied upon the truth, accuracy and completeness of the information, forecasts, data and financial terms provided to it or used by it, assumed that the same were not misleading and did not assume or accept any liability or responsibility for any independent verification or checking of such information or any independent valuation or appraisal of any of the assets, operations or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Visa CEMEA, the other participating regions or Visa Inc. With respect to the financial forecasts provided to or otherwise reviewed by ABN AMRO, it assumed, with Visa CEMEA’s consent, that they were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of Visa CEMEA and the other participating regions, as the case may be, as to the future financial performance of Visa CEMEA, or the other participating regions, as the case may be, at that time, and that no event subsequent to such time and undisclosed to ABN AMRO had a material effect on them. ABN AMRO does not assume or accept liability or responsibility for (and expressed no view as to) such forecasts or the assumptions on which they were based. In preparing its opinion, ABN AMRO received specific confirmation from senior management of Visa CEMEA that the assumptions specified above were appropriate.

ABN AMRO assumed, with Visa CEMEA’s consent, that: (i) the restructuring will be consummated on the terms and conditions set out in the restructuring agreement without any material changes to, or waiver of, its terms or conditions; and (ii) the final terms of the restructuring agreement would not vary materially from those set forth in the draft reviewed by ABN AMRO.

ABN AMRO’s opinion was necessarily based upon financial, economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to it or used by it up to, the date of its opinion. Subsequent developments in the conditions described above may affect its opinion and the assumptions made in preparing it and ABN AMRO is not obliged to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion if conditions change. Further, but without limitation to the generality of any of the assumptions and qualifications set forth in ABN AMRO’s opinion, and as agreed with Visa CEMEA, ABN AMRO’s opinion did not focus on or otherwise take account of any impact that any adjustment to, or alteration of, the Visa CEMEA consideration after the date of its opinion may have.

ABN AMRO’s opinion dated as at June 8, 2007 was only one of the many factors taken into consideration by the Visa CEMEA regional board of directors in making its determination to approve the restructuring. The terms of the restructuring were determined through negotiations between Visa CEMEA, the other participating regions and Visa Europe, and were approved by the Visa CEMEA regional board of directors. The decision to approve the terms of the restructuring, including the Visa CEMEA consideration, was solely that of the Visa CEMEA regional board of directors and not that of ABN AMRO or any of its affiliates.

The summary of ABN AMRO’s analyses described below that were performed in connection with its opinion should not be taken as a complete description of the analyses underlying the opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex analytic process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analyses and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to summary description. In arriving at its opinion, ABN AMRO made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor considered by it. Accordingly, ABN AMRO believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors, without considering all analyses and factors, could create a misleading or incomplete

80

view of the processes underlying its analyses and the ABN AMRO opinion. In addition, ABN AMRO did not derive any value solely from or draw any conclusion with respect to fairness based solely upon any particular analysis. Moreover, an evaluation of the results of these analyses is not entirely formulaic; rather, these analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the transaction and values of the companies, business segments or transactions being analyzed.

Financial Analyses

The following is a brief summary of the material financial analyses performed by ABN AMRO and reviewed with the Visa CEMEA regional board of directors in connection with its opinion. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand ABN AMRO’s financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of ABN AMRO’s financial analyses.

Overview of methodologies. ABN AMRO assessed the relative valuation of Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc. through a combination of discounted cash flow analysis and comparable listed companies analysis. From these methodologies, a combined valuation range was assessed for each of Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc., the comparison of which indicated the implied level of Visa CEMEA’s shareholding in Visa Inc. The implied shareholdings in Visa Inc. from the relative valuation analysis were in turn compared to the percentages resulting from a contribution analysis comparing certain financial metrics of Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc. The following table summarizes the aggregate implied Visa Inc. shareholdings of the Visa CEMEA members resulting from the relative valuation analysis:

Implied Aggregate Visa CEMEA shareholding in Visa Inc.

		Visa CEMEA valuation range
		Lower end		Mid point		Upper end
	Lower end	3.55	%	3.87	%	4.19	%
Visa Inc. Valuation Range	Mid point	3.33	%	3.64	%	3.94	%
	Upper end	3.14	%	3.43	%	3.71	%

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

ABN AMRO performed a DCF analysis for each of Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc. to determine the aggregate level of ownership in Visa Inc. attributable to Visa CEMEA members implied by the discounted cash flow valuation of Visa CEMEA relative to the discounted cash flow valuation of Visa Inc.

Financial projections for the period 2007 – 2010 provided by Visa CEMEA formed the basis of the base case scenario for Visa CEMEA. In the case of Visa Inc., financial projections were developed on the basis of forecasts provided by the management of the participating regions for the period 2007 – 2010 by each of the participating regions and the pro forma consolidated financial projections, reflecting consolidation adjustments and cost synergies forecast by the participating regions’ management to arise from the integration. In the case of Visa CEMEA, expected trends in financial performance subsequent to fiscal year 2010 were projected on the basis of discussions with and data provided by Visa CEMEA management and finance personnel, having regard to historic trends and anticipated developments in the markets in which Visa CEMEA operates. In the case of Visa Inc., longer term financial projections were based on an analysis of potential trends for each participating region on the basis of discussions of expected developments in each participating region during the period 2007 –

81

2010 and potential developments in the payments processing marketplace generally. ABN AMRO assumed a valuation date of June 8, 2007 for both DCF valuations.

From comparison of the base case DCF valuations of Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc. developed from the above forecasts, an ownership level of Visa CEMEA members in Visa Inc. of 4.0% was implied.

For Visa CEMEA, a DCF valuation range 7.5% above and below the base case scenario was established as an indication of a range of potential outcomes should Visa CEMEA’s revenue performance exceed, or fall short of, the financial projections described above. This range was determined on the basis of the net present value impact of extrapolating into subsequent years the level of revenue over or under performance (relative to the original budget) presently regarded by Visa CEMEA management as realistically possible for fiscal 2008. For Visa Inc., a narrower DCF valuation range of 6.0% above and below the base case scenario was assumed on the basis of the consolidated entity’s greater geographic diversification and greater ability to offset revenue variances via the management of discretionary expenditures. The range of DCF valuations for each of Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc., on the basis of these scenarios, implied ownership levels of Visa CEMEA members in Visa Inc. of between 3.5% and 4.6%.

Comparable Companies Analysis

ABN AMRO considered the potential valuation of each of Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc. on the basis of market valuations observed for companies with a comparable business model, financial profile and geographic coverage to Visa. These companies comprise two principal groupings: companies engaged in payments processing activities (with MasterCard treated as a distinct sub-group) and stock exchanges.

The comparable companies included the following:

Payment Processors   •     Alliance Data Systems Corporation   •     CheckFree Corporation   •     eFunds Corporation   •     Euronet Worldwide, Inc.   •     Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc.   •     Global Payments, Inc.   •     Total System Services, Inc.   •     Moneygram International Inc.   •     American Express Company   •     MasterCard Incorporated Stock Exchanges   •     CBOT Holdings Inc.   •     Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc.   •     Deutsche Börse AG   •     London Stock Exchange Group   •     The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.   •     NYSE Euronext   •     OMX AB

Although, with the exception of MasterCard, the selected companies are not directly comparable to Visa Inc. or Visa CEMEA, the companies indicated were chosen because they represent a group of publicly traded companies with operations that, for purposes of analysis, may be considered broadly similar to certain operations of Visa Inc. and Visa CEMEA. In determining valuation ranges on the basis of comparable companies, lower emphasis was placed on valuations implied by listed stock exchanges. While these companies share certain common features with Visa Inc. (being in essence technology platforms previously owned by user organizations), many of the fundamental business drivers are distinct from those impacting payments processor companies.

For the comparable companies selected, ABN AMRO reviewed:

• estimated enterprise value as a multiple of estimated EBITDA; and

• stock price as a multiple of estimated earnings per share.

82

EBITDA and earnings per share multiples were reviewed with reference to forecast performance for fiscal 2008 for Visa CEMEA and Visa Inc., provided to ABN AMRO as described above. In each case, comparable company stock price performance was reviewed up to and including June 5, 2007.

	Selected Payment Processor Companies (excluding MasterCard)		Selected Stock Exchange Companies		MasterCard
	Range	Median	Range	Median
Enterprise value as a multiple of Forecast 2008 EBITDA	8.2x-12.5x	10.0x	6.6x-17.9x	14.2x	15.3x
Stock price as a multiple of Forecast 2008 EPS	16.6x-22.9x	18.5x	19.3x-34.5x	24.1x	26.5x

On the basis of this comparable company analysis, ABN AMRO inferred a range of ownership for Visa CEMEA’s members in Visa Inc. of 3.7% to 4.3%.

Contribution Analysis. ABN AMRO performed a relative contribution analysis to determine the percentage of Visa CEMEA’s contribution to pro forma consolidated revenues, EBITDA and net income on the basis of pro forma consolidated results for fiscal 2006 and on the basis of consolidated pro forma projections for fiscal year 2008 for Visa Inc. provided to ABN AMRO as described above. The results of this analysis are summarized in the table below:

Contribution analysis: Visa CEMEA versus pro forma Visa Inc.

Metric	2006		2008
Revenue	5.15	%	5.59	%
EBITDA	2.68	%	3.95	%
Net Income	2.52	%	4.28	%

Engagement of ABN AMRO

ABN AMRO is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities. Visa CEMEA’s regional board of directors selected ABN AMRO based on these qualifications. ABN AMRO, in the ordinary course of business has provided, and in the future may provide, investment banking and financial advisory services to Visa CEMEA or Visa Inc. for which it has received or expects to receive fees.

Under the terms of ABN AMRO’s engagement letter for its financial advisory services in connection with the restructuring, ABN AMRO is entitled to receive fees, including fixed and discretionary components, in relation to the rendering of general financial advisory services in connection with the restructuring and a further separate fixed fee upon the rendering of its fairness opinion to the Visa CEMEA regional board of directors. Visa CEMEA has also agreed to indemnify ABN AMRO and related persons and entities against various liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of ABN AMRO’s engagement and to reimburse ABN AMRO for its reasonable out of pocket expenses, including reasonable fees and expenses of its legal counsel, incurred by ABN AMRO in connection with its engagement.

Board Recommendations

Recommendation of the Board of Visa International

Visa International’s board of directors has determined that the restructuring transactions, taken as a whole, are fair to and in the best interests of Visa International and the members of Visa International. The board of directors of Visa International has unanimously approved the restructuring agreement and the equity incentive plan and recommends that its members vote “FOR” the restructuring proposal and the equity incentive plan proposal. If the restructuring is not consummated for any reason, the board of directors presently intends to continue to operate Visa International in its current form.

83

Recommendation of the Visa AP Regional Board

The members of the Visa AP regional board of directors in attendance unanimously recommended that the Visa International board of directors adopt the restructuring proposal and the equity incentive plan proposal.

Recommendation of the Visa LAC Regional Board

The members of the Visa LAC regional board of directors in attendance unanimously recommended that the Visa International board of directors adopt the restructuring proposal and the equity incentive plan proposal.

Recommendation of the Visa CEMEA Regional Board

The members of the Visa CEMEA regional board of directors in attendance unanimously recommended that the Visa International board of directors adopt the restructuring proposal and the equity incentive plan proposal.

Recommendation of the Board of Visa U.S.A.

Visa U.S.A.’s board of directors determined that the restructuring transactions, taken as a whole, are fair to and in the best interests of Visa U.S.A. and the members of Visa U.S.A. The members of the board of directors of Visa U.S.A. in attendance unanimously approved the restructuring agreement and the equity incentive plan and recommends that its members vote “FOR” the adoption of the restructuring agreement and the equity incentive plan proposal. If the restructuring is not consummated for any reason, the board of directors presently intends to continue to operate Visa U.S.A. in its current form.

Recommendation of the Board of Visa Canada

Visa Canada’s board of directors determined that the restructuring transactions, taken as a whole, are fair to and in the best interests of Visa Canada and the members of Visa Canada. The members of the board of directors of Visa Canada in attendance unanimously approved the restructuring agreement and recommend that its members vote “FOR” the adoption of the restructuring agreement and the equity incentive plan proposal. If the restructuring is not consummated for any reason, the board of directors presently intends to continue to operate Visa Canada in its current form.

Interests of Directors and Officers of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, and the Regional Directors of Visa International in the Restructuring Proposal and the Equity Incentive Plan Proposal

No director or officer of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Visa Canada or any of their affiliates has a substantial interest, direct or indirect, in the restructuring proposal or equity incentive plan proposal. No regional director of Visa International or any of their affiliates has a substantial interest, direct or indirect, in the restructuring proposal or equity incentive plan proposal.

Restrictions on Sales of Shares by Affiliates of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada

All shares, whether held by affiliated or non-affiliated persons, will be subject to certain transfer restrictions under Visa Inc.’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation. For a description of these restrictions, see “Description of Capital Stock of Visa Inc.—Our Common Stock—Transfer Restrictions.” In addition, shares that are issued to any person that is deemed to be an “affiliate” of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Visa Canada are subject to restrictions on resale under the Securities Act. In the case of Visa Canada, affiliated person status will be determined as of the time of its general meeting. Persons deemed to be affiliates include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with, either Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Visa Canada and may include our executive officers and directors as well as our significant stockholders. Persons who are deemed to be affiliates may not sell their shares of Visa Inc. common stock that were acquired in connection with the mergers except pursuant to:

• an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the resale of those shares;

84

• an exemption under paragraph (d) of Rule 145 under the Securities Act; or

• any other applicable exemption under the Securities Act.

Resales of shares of Visa Inc. common stock by affiliates of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada or Visa Inc. are not being registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this proxy statement-prospectus forms a part.

Dissenter’s Rights of Appraisal

Visa International and Visa U.S.A.

Pursuant to Delaware law, neither members of Visa International nor Visa U.S.A. are entitled to dissenters’ rights of appraisal.

Visa Canada

A registered member/shareholder of Visa Canada is, upon Visa Canada becoming subject to the OBCA as contemplated in the restructuring agreement, entitled to dissent from the amalgamation resolution in the manner provided in Section 185 of the OBCA. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the provisions of Section 185 of the OBCA. A member/shareholder of Visa Canada that intends to exercise its right of dissent should carefully consider and comply with the provisions of Section 185 of the OBCA. Failure to comply with the provisions of that section and adhere to the procedures established therein may result in the loss of all rights thereunder.

A dissenting shareholder will be entitled, in the event the amalgamation becomes effective, to dissent and be paid by Visa Canada the fair value of the shares of Visa Canada held by such dissenting shareholder determined as at the close of business on the day before the meeting at which the amalgamation resolution was approved. A dissenting shareholder may receive consideration for its shares that is of less value than the consideration that such dissenting shareholder would have received upon completion of the amalgamation.

A member/shareholder of Visa Canada that wishes to exercise dissent rights must provide a dissent notice to Visa Canada at or before the meeting. The filing of a dissent notice does not deprive a member/shareholder of Visa Canada of the right to vote in respect of the amalgamation resolution; however, the OBCA provides, in effect, that a member/shareholder of Visa Canada that has submitted a dissent notice and votes for the amalgamation resolution will no longer be considered a dissenting shareholder. The OBCA does not provide, and Visa Canada will not assume, that a vote against the amalgamation resolution constitutes a dissent notice.

Under the OBCA, there is no right of partial dissent. Accordingly, a member/shareholder of Visa Canada may exercise its dissent right only with respect to all Visa Canada shares held by it or on behalf of any one beneficial owner.

Visa Canada is required within 10 days after the approval of the amalgamation resolution to notify each dissenting shareholder that the amalgamation resolution has been approved, but such notice is not required to be sent to any member/shareholder of Visa Canada that voted for the amalgamation resolution or that has withdrawn its dissent notice.

A dissenting shareholder must, within 20 days after the dissenting shareholder receives notice that the amalgamation resolution has been approved or, if the dissenting shareholder does not receive such notice, within 20 days after the dissenting shareholder learns that the amalgamation resolution has been adopted, send to Visa Canada a written notice, containing its name and address, the number and class of Visa Canada shares in respect of which the dissenting shareholder dissented, and a demand for payment of the fair value of such shares. Visa Canada will place a notice on share certificates representing a dissenting shareholder’s shares to the effect that the holder is a dissenting shareholder and will deliver the share certificates to a dissenting shareholder.

85

On filing a dissent notice that is not withdrawn as contemplated in Section 185 of the OBCA, a dissenting shareholder ceases to have any rights as a member/shareholder of Visa Canada, other than the right to be paid the fair value of its Visa Canada shares as determined under Section 185 of the OBCA, except if the directors of Visa Canada terminate the amalgamation agreement under Subsection 176(5) of the OBCA, in which case Visa Canada will be required to reinstate the dissenting shareholder’s rights as a member/shareholder of Visa Canada.

Visa Canada is required, not later than seven days after the later of the effective date of the amalgamation or the date on which Visa Canada received the payment demand of a dissenting shareholder, to send to each dissenting shareholder that has sent a payment demand to it a written offer to pay on behalf of Visa Canada, for its Visa Canada shares in an amount considered by the Visa Canada board to be fair value thereof, accompanied by a statement showing the manner in which the fair value was determined. Every offer to pay, as between shares of the same class, must be on the same terms. The amount specified in the offer to pay lapses if Visa Canada does not receive an acceptance thereof within 30 days after the offer to pay has been made.

If Visa Canada fails to make an offer to pay or if a dissenting shareholder fails to accept an offer that has been made, Visa Canada may, within 50 days after the effective date of the amalgamation or within such further period as a court may allow, apply to a court to fix a fair value for the Visa Canada shares of dissenting shareholders. If Visa Canada fails to apply to a court, a dissenting shareholder may apply to a court for the same purpose within a further period of 20 days or within such further period as a court may allow. A dissenting shareholder is not required to give security for costs in such application.

Upon an application to a court, all dissenting shareholders whose Visa Canada shares have not been purchased by Visa Canada will be joined as parties and bound by the decision of the court, and Visa Canada will be required to notify each affected dissenting shareholder of the date, place and consequences of the application and of its right to appear and be heard in person or by counsel. Upon any such application to a court, the court may determine whether any person is a dissenting shareholder that should be joined as a party, and the court will then fix a fair value for the Visa Canada shares of all dissenting shareholders. The final order of a court will be rendered against Visa Canada in favor of each dissenting shareholder and for the amount of the fair value of its Visa Canada shares as fixed by the court. The court may, in its discretion, allow a reasonable rate of interest on the amount payable to each dissenting shareholder from the effective date of the amalgamation until the date of payment.

As part of the amalgamation, the Visa Canada shares held by a dissenting shareholder will be cancelled upon the amalgamation becoming effective and each dissenting shareholder will cease to have any rights as a member/shareholder of Visa Canada or as a shareholder of Visa Inc. as a result of the amalgamation other than the right to be paid the fair value of such Visa Canada shares in the amount agreed to between Visa Canada and the dissenting shareholder or in the amount of the judgment of the court, as the case may be. Until one of these events occurs, the dissenting shareholder may withdraw its dissent notice or Visa Canada may terminate the amalgamation agreement under Subsection 176(5) of the OBCA and, in either event, the dissent and appraisal proceedings in respect of that dissenting shareholder will be discontinued.

Visa Canada cannot make a payment to a dissenting shareholder under Section 185 of the OBCA if there are reasonable grounds for believing it is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or that the realizable value of Visa Canada’s assets would thereby be less than the aggregate of its liabilities. In such event, Visa Canada must notify each dissenting shareholder that it is lawfully unable to pay dissenting shareholders for their Visa Canada shares, in which case the dissenting shareholder may, by written notice to Visa Canada within 30 days after receipt of such notice, withdraw its dissent notice; in which case, such dissenting shareholder will be deemed to have participated in the amalgamation as a non-dissenting shareholder. If the dissenting shareholder does not withdraw its dissent notice, it retains its status as a claimant against Visa Canada, to be paid as soon as Visa Canada is lawfully entitled to do so or, in a liquidation, to be ranked subordinate to creditors but prior to the then Visa Canada shareholders.

86

All Visa Canada shares held by dissenting shareholders will, if such holders are ultimately entitled to be paid the fair value thereof, be deemed to be transferred to Visa Canada as of the effective date of the amalgamation in exchange for such fair value. If such dissenting shareholders ultimately are not so entitled to be paid the fair value therefore, such dissenting shareholders will acquire shares of Visa Inc. on the same basis as all other members/shareholders of Visa Canada pursuant to the amalgamation.

The above is only a summary of the dissenting shareholder provisions of the OBCA, which are technical and complex. It is suggested that any member/shareholder of Visa Canada wishing to avail itself of its rights under these provisions seeks its own legal advice as failure to comply strictly with the provisions of the OBCA may prejudice its dissent rights.

Regulatory Approvals

Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and related rules, commonly referred to as the HSR Act, certain transactions, including the restructuring, may not be completed unless certain notification and waiting period requirements have been satisfied. Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada filed the required notification and report forms pursuant to the HSR Act describing the restructuring on May 10, 2007. Early termination of the HSR Act waiting period was granted on May 22, 2007.

Members acquiring voting securities in Visa Inc. may be separately subject to the notification and waiting period requirements of the HSR Act.

The restructuring may also be subject to review by other governmental authorities under the antitrust laws, competition laws or similar laws of other jurisdictions where Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada, and Visa International conduct business. Any required approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner or at all.

At any time, either the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, or state or foreign governmental authorities could challenge or seek to block the restructuring under the antitrust laws, competition laws or similar laws. Moreover, in some jurisdictions, a competitor, customer or other third party could initiate a private action under antitrust or other laws challenging or seeking to enjoin the restructuring, before or after it is completed.

In addition, it is a condition to the closing of the restructuring that:

• Visa Europe and VESI shall have received from HM Revenue and Customs a tax clearance satisfactory to them in their reasonable discretion with respect to the treatment of the restructuring under English law; and

• Visa Canada and its members shall have received an advance income tax ruling from Canada Revenue Agency with respect to the income tax consequences to Visa Canada and its members of the restructuring, in form and substance acceptable to Visa Canada, in its reasonable discretion.

87

THE GLOBAL RESTRUCTURING AGREEMENT

The following is a summary of the material terms of the Global Restructuring Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2007, among Visa Inc., Visa International Service Association, Visa U.S.A. Inc., Visa Europe Limited, Visa Canada Association, Inovant, Inovant, Inc., Visa Europe Services, Inc., Visa International Transition LLC, VI merger sub, Visa U.S.A. merger sub and Visa Canada merger sub. You should read the full text of the restructuring agreement, which is attached as Annex A and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Restructuring

Actions Prior to Restructuring Closing Date

On or before the business day prior to the closing date of the restructuring, the parties to the restructuring agreement will cause all of the following to occur:

• Visa Canada will apply to the Ministry of Consumer and Business Services, Province of Ontario, for supplementary letters patent to permit membership interests to be transferable and the bylaws of Visa Canada will be amended to accommodate the vesting of the commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system by members of Visa Canada in service agreements. Visa Canada will also surrender its entire membership interest in Visa International and enter into a services agreement to continue the existing commercial rights of Visa Canada with respect to its participation in the Visa payments system.

• The bylaws of Visa International will be amended and restated so that members of Visa International (other than Visa Europe) will have an equity membership interest, which will represent the voting and economic rights of the member, and a non-equity membership interest, which will represent the member’s commercial and other rights and obligations in connection with participation in the Visa payments system. In addition, this amendment will segregate the entire membership interests of Visa Europe in Visa International into a distinct class of membership interest (representing the economic and voting rights of Visa Europe, as well as its commercial rights and obligations in connection with participation in the Visa payments system). In the restructuring, the entire membership interest of Visa Europe will be cancelled and Visa Europe will be issued Visa Inc. common stock. Thereafter, Visa Europe’s commercial rights and obligations with regard to the Visa payments system will be governed by the agreements that we are entering into with Visa Europe and not by their former membership interests in Visa International. In addition, Visa Canada will have surrendered its entire membership interest in Visa International and entered into the service agreement referred to above, which will establish Visa Canada’s commercial rights and obligations with regard to the Visa payments system. For a description of the agreements we are entering into with Visa Europe and Visa Canada, see “Material Contracts—The Framework Agreement,” “—The Put-Call Option Agreement” and “—Canadian Services Agreement and Other Agreements.”

• The bylaws and certificate of incorporation of Visa U.S.A. will be amended and restated so that members of Visa U.S.A. will have an equity membership interest, which will represent the voting and economic rights of each member of Visa U.S.A., and a non-equity membership interest, which will represent the member’s commercial and other rights and obligations in connection with participation in the Visa payments system.

Visa International Merger

Visa International established two transitory entities in order to accomplish the Visa International merger. Visa International Transition LLC, which we refer to as VI LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Visa International. VI Merger Sub Inc., which we refer to as VI merger sub, is a Delaware non-stock corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of VI LLC. In the Visa International merger, VI merger sub will be merged with and into Visa International, and Visa International will continue as the surviving

88

corporation after the closing. Upon the effectiveness of the Visa International merger, each of the outstanding equity membership interests held by members of Visa International (other than Visa Europe and Visa Canada) will be canceled in consideration of the issuance of limited liability company interests in VI LLC, which are substantially similar to the equity membership interests in Visa International formerly held by such members and which we refer to as LLC shares. These LLC shares will be issued ratably in accordance with members’ respective equity membership interests in Visa International. Each of the non-equity membership interests held by members of Visa International will continue to be issued and outstanding after this merger and the closing of the restructuring. These non-equity membership interests will represent the rights and obligations of members with regard to participation in the Visa payments system.

Visa Europe’s entire membership interest in Visa International will be canceled in this merger, and Visa Europe will be issued LLC shares. In addition, Visa Canada will have ceased, prior to the Visa International merger, to be a member of Visa International, at the same time as its commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system will be embodied in a service agreement. Thus, Visa Europe and Visa Canada will not retain any membership interests in Visa International following this merger and the restructuring. Instead, the rights and obligations of Visa Europe and Visa Canada with regard to participation in the Visa payments system will be governed by, in the case of Visa Europe, the framework agreement between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe, and, in the case of Visa Canada, the services agreement, trademark agreements and support agreement among Visa Inc., Visa International and Visa Canada. For a description of the agreements relating to Visa Europe, see “Material Contracts.”

Each of the membership interests in VI merger sub outstanding prior to this merger that are held by Visa Inc. will be converted into the entire equity membership interest in Visa International. All of the LLC shares held by Visa International immediately prior to this merger will be canceled for no consideration.

Upon the effectiveness of the Visa International merger: (i) the certificate of incorporation of Visa International will be amended in the form of the restated certificate of incorporation of Visa International as provided in the certificate of merger; (ii) the first restated bylaws of Visa International will be amended in the form of the second restated bylaws of Visa International attached to the restructuring agreement; (iii) the directors of VI merger sub immediately prior to the merger will become the directors of Visa International following the merger; and (iv) the officers of Visa International immediately prior to the merger will remain the officers of Visa International following the merger.

Reallocation of LLC Shares

Promptly after the effectiveness of the Visa International merger, the board of directors of VI LLC will cause the existing limited liability company agreement of VI LLC to be amended and restated in order to reorganize and reclassify the LLC shares, such that members of VI LLC will hold LLC shares in an amount, and of a class and series, that corresponds to the parties’ intended initial allocation of shares of Visa Inc. as follows: (i) in the case of Visa U.S.A., 127,800,553 class USA LLC shares; (ii) in the case of Visa Europe, 62,213,201 class EU (series I) LLC shares and 27,904,464 class EU (series II) LLC shares; (iii) in the case of each eligible member of Visa International associated with the Visa AP region, a number of class AP LLC shares equal to 119,100,481 multiplied by such member’s initial ownership percentage; (iv) in the case of each eligible member of Visa International associated with the Visa LAC region, a number of class LAC LLC shares equal to 80,137,915 multiplied by such member’s initial ownership percentage; and (v) in the case of each eligible member of Visa International associated with the Visa CEMEA region, a number of class CEMEA LLC shares equal to 36,749,698 multiplied by such member’s initial ownership percentage.

VI LLC Merger

Promptly after the reallocation described above, VI LLC will be merged with and into Visa Inc., which we refer to as the VI LLC merger, and Visa Inc. will continue as the surviving corporation after the effectiveness of this merger.

89

Upon the effectiveness of the VI LLC merger, the regional classes of LLC shares will be canceled and, in consideration for such cancellation, Visa Inc. will issue to the former holders thereof, on a one-to-one basis, shares of common stock of Visa Inc. corresponding to the same five geographic regions: (i) each class USA LLC share will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to the holder thereof of one share of our class USA common stock; (ii) each class EU (series I) LLC share will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to the holder thereof of one share of our class EU (series I) common stock; (iii) each class EU (series II) LLC share will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to the holder thereof of one share of our class EU (series II) common stock; (iv) each class AP LLC share will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to the holder thereof of one share of our class AP common stock; (v) each class LAC LLC share will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to the holder thereof of one share of our class LAC common stock; (vi) each class CEMEA LLC share will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to the holder thereof of one share of our class CEMEA common stock; and (vii) each share of Visa Inc. common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the VI LLC merger will be canceled for no consideration.

Upon the effectiveness of the VI LLC merger: (i) the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc., as then in effect and as attached as Annex C, will be the certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc.; (ii) the bylaws of Visa Inc. will be amended and restated in their entirety to read substantially in the form attached as Annex D; and (iii) the directors and officers of Visa Inc. will remain the directors and officers of Visa Inc. as the surviving entity in the VI LLC merger.

Visa U.S.A. Merger

Visa U.S.A. merger sub is a newly formed Delaware non-stock corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc. On the business day immediately following the date on which the VI LLC merger occurs, Visa U.S.A. merger sub will be merged with and into Visa U.S.A., which we refer to as the Visa U.S.A. merger, and Visa U.S.A. will continue as the surviving non-stock corporation.

Upon the effectiveness of the Visa U.S.A. merger: (i) each of the outstanding equity membership interests in Visa U.S.A. will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to the holder thereof of a number of shares of our class USA common stock equal to 426,390,481 multiplied by such holder’s initial Visa Inc. ownership percentage, which will be equal to its membership proportion (as defined in the Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation); (ii) each of the non-equity membership interests in Visa U.S.A. will continue to be issued and outstanding after the effectiveness of the Visa U.S.A. merger and the restructuring; and (iii) each of the outstanding membership interests in Visa U.S.A. merger sub will be canceled in consideration of the issuance to Visa Inc. of the entire equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A.

Upon the effectiveness of the Visa U.S.A. merger: (i) the first restated certificate of incorporation of Visa U.S.A. will be amended in the form of the second restated certificate of incorporation of Visa U.S.A. as provided in the certificate of merger; (ii) the first restated bylaws of Visa U.S.A. will be amended and restated in the form of the second restated Visa U.S.A. bylaws attached to the restructuring agreement; (iii) the directors of Visa U.S.A. merger sub immediately prior to the merger will become the directors of Visa U.S.A. following the merger; and (iv) and officers of Visa U.S.A. immediately prior to the merger will remain the officers of Visa U.S.A. following the merger.

Visa Canada Restructuring

Prior to the Visa International merger, the charter of Visa Canada will be amended to permit Visa Canada membership interests to be transferable, and the bylaws of Visa Canada will be amended to accommodate the vesting of the commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system of members of Visa Canada in service agreements. Prior to the Visa International merger, Visa Canada will surrender to Visa International its entire membership in Visa International and Visa International and Visa Inc. will enter into a services agreement with Visa Canada to continue Visa Canada’s existing commercial rights with

90

respect to the Visa payments system. At the closing of the restructuring, Visa Canada will offer to its members the opportunity to enter into separate services agreements with Visa Canada; Visa Canada and Visa International will offer to members of Visa Canada the opportunity to enter into separate trademark agreements with Visa International; and Visa Inc. will offer members of Visa Canada the opportunity to enter into a support agreement with Visa Inc., all of which agreements are designed to enable members of Visa Canada to continue their existing commercial rights with respect to the Visa payments system.

On the business day after the date on which the VI LLC merger occurs, each eligible member of Visa Canada that has elected to do so will be entitled to exchange its membership interest in Visa Canada with Visa Inc. for a number of shares of Visa Inc. class Canada common stock equal to 22,034,685 multiplied by such member’s initial ownership percentage, which shall be such member’s card sales volume (as defined in the bylaws of Visa Canada) during the period from October 1, 1990, through the September 30 immediately preceding the closing of the restructuring, expressed as a percentage of the aggregate card sales volume of all eligible members of Visa Canada during such period. Immediately following such exchanges, Visa Canada will be converted from a non-share capital corporation to a for profit share capital corporation governed by the OBCA, with Visa Inc. receiving, as a member of Visa Canada, common shares of the converted Visa Canada, and eligible members of Visa Canada that did not previously elect to exchange their membership interests as described above also receiving common shares of the converted Visa Canada. Visa Inc. will then transfer its common shares of Visa Canada to Visa Canada merger sub in exchange for common shares of Visa Canada merger sub.

As soon as practicable after the conversion of Visa Canada described above, Visa Canada, Visa Canada merger sub, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc., and Visa Inc. will enter into an amalgamation agreement pursuant to which Visa Canada and Visa Canada merger sub will be amalgamated and, upon completion of the redemption referred to below, Visa Canada will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Inc. Upon the effectiveness of the Visa Canada amalgamation, all of the outstanding share capital of Visa Canada (other than the common shares held by Visa Canada merger sub) will be converted into redeemable preferred shares of the combined entity in the Visa Canada amalgamation, which shall be immediately redeemed for (and Visa Inc. will issue to each eligible Visa Canada member then a shareholder of Visa Canada) a number of shares of our class Canada common stock equal to 22,034,685 multiplied by each eligible Visa Canada member’s initial Visa Inc. ownership percentage, all of the outstanding share capital of Visa Canada merger sub will be converted into 100 common shares of the combined entity formed in the Visa Canada amalgamation, and the common shares of Visa Canada held by Visa Canada merger sub will be canceled without payment. Upon the effectiveness of the Visa Canada amalgamation, the bylaws of Visa Canada will be the Visa Canada merger sub bylaws, and the directors and officers of Visa Canada merger sub will become the directors and officers of Visa Canada.

Inovant U.S. Holdco Merger; Share for Share Exchange

On the business day after the later to occur of the Visa U.S.A. merger and the Visa Canada amalgamation, Inovant, Inc., will be merged with and into Visa Inc., which we refer to as the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, and Visa Inc. will continue as the surviving corporation after the closing of the Inovant U.S. holdco merger. Upon the effectiveness of the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, all of the outstanding capital stock of Inovant, Inc. will be canceled in consideration for the issuance to Visa U.S.A., which is the sole stockholder of Inovant, Inc., of 3,791,455 shares of our class USA common stock. Upon the effectiveness of the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Visa Inc., as in effect immediately prior to the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, will remain in effect as the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Visa Inc. following the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, and the directors and officers of Visa Inc. will remain the directors and officers of Visa Inc. (as the surviving corporation in the Inovant U.S. holdco merger).

On the business day immediately after the date of the effectiveness of the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, VESI will deliver to Visa Inc. all of the limited liability company interests in Inovant then owned by VESI, in exchange for 549,587 shares of class EU (series III) common stock.

91

True-Up of Merger Consideration

The initial allocation of shares of Visa Inc. common stock among the regions other than Visa Europe, which we refer to as the participating regions, was determined under a methodology that was agreed upon among the participating regions. The same methodology was applied to the unincorporated regions of Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA as was applied to Visa Canada and Visa U.S.A. It was based upon the net income projected to be contributed by each participating region in fiscal 2008. In addition, there were some negotiated adjustments that were made to the allocations to reflect, among other things, potential operating synergies and one-time adjustments to financial projections. We refer to this initial allocation of shares as the baseline amount. The consideration to be received by Visa Europe was the result of a negotiation between the regions participating in Visa Inc., on the one hand, and Visa Europe, on the other hand. For more information about the shares being issued to Visa Europe, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring—Shares Issued to Visa Europe.”

The shares of common stock that will be issued at the restructuring closing will initially be allocated on a regional basis as follows:

Region	Shares issued and outstanding after restructuring closing (not giving effect to the true-up)	Percentage ownership (not including VE’s redeemable shares)		Percentage ownership (including VE’s redeemable shares)
Visa U.S.A.(1)	426,390,481	57.06	%	55.01	%
Visa AP	119,100,481	15.94	%	15.37	%
Visa LAC	80,137,915	10.73	%	10.34	%
Visa CEMEA	36,749,698	4.92	%	4.74	%
Visa Canada	22,034,685	2.95	%	2.84	%
Visa Europe(2)	62,762,788	8.40	%	8.10	%
Visa Europe(3)	27,904,464	—		3.60	%
Total	775,080,512	100.00	%	100.00	%

(1) Excluding shares of class USA common stock held by Visa U.S.A.

(2) Excluding class EU (series II) common stock but including 549,587 shares of class EU (series III) common stock issued to VESI, a subsidiary of Visa Europe.

(3) Class EU (series II) common stock.

In order to reflect relative actual performance, as compared with projections, there will be a subsequent conversion and reallocation of shares, which we refer to as the true-up, based on each participating region’s relative under- or over-achievement (beyond certain percentage limits which we refer to as tolerance bands) of its net revenue targets for the relevant four quarter period, which we refer to as the measurement period. As a result of the true-up, each of the regional classes of common stock will be converted into class C common stock or, in the case of the class USA common stock, class B common stock prior to the initial public offering of our common stock.

If a participating region’s actual net revenue during the measurement period is not greater than 104% of its estimated net revenue for such period and not less than 98% of its estimated net revenue for such period, then that region’s applicable multiplier will be 1.0, and no adjustment will be made to that region’s baseline amount. If a region exceeds or falls short of its net revenue targets by an amount in excess of these tolerance band percentages, then the region’s applicable multiplier will equal the percentage difference between the actual and projected net revenues for the measurement period multiplied by 1.5. The upper tolerance band percentage will be increased from 104% to 108% if a region exceeds its marketing budget by more than 30% during the measurement period. The lower tolerance band percentage will be adjusted from 98% to 96% if the participating region’s actual marketing expense is less than 70% of the participating region’s projected marketing expense during the measurement period. The region’s adjusted amount equals the baseline amount multiplied by the

92

applicable multiplier, plus an additional, negotiated amount for, among other things, a negotiated portion of the overall expected cost savings relating to the restructuring. Each participating region’s adjusted ownership percentage after the true-up will equal this adjusted amount as a percentage of the aggregate adjusted amounts of all the participating regions, multiplied by 0.916 (to exclude Visa Europe’s 8.4% interest represented by the class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) in Visa Inc. from the true-up calculation). Finally, the applicable conversion rate for each regional class of shares will be calculated as the quotient of (1) the number of shares of Visa Inc. common stock outstanding (except for the Class EU (series II) shares of common stock and except for any shares of common stock owned by any subsidiary of Visa Inc.) immediately prior to the true-up calculation, multiplied by the applicable region’s adjusted ownership percentage, divided by (2) the number of shares of such regional class of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the true-up calculation.

Following the closing of the restructuring, each of the participating regions will deliver to us quarterly financial statements, including a calculation of the net revenue of each Visa region and of each Visa region’s marketing expenses.

Because the true-up calculation is based on relative financial performance among the regions, it is possible that a region could meet or exceed its net revenue goals and be allocated fewer shares as a result of the true-up if other regions were to outperform their revenue targets by a greater percentage.

The measurement period will be the four quarters ending September 30, 2008; provided, however, that if Visa Inc. files a registration statement on Form S-1 for an initial public offering prior to the end of fiscal 2008, then the measurement period will be the four quarter period ending with (and including) the latest quarter for which financial statements are included in the registration statement on Form S-1 on the date it is declared effective by the SEC. In no event, however, will the measurement period be any earlier than the four quarters ending September 30, 2007.

On the true-up conversion date:

• each outstanding share of class USA common stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of class B common stock based on the applicable conversion rate for the class USA common stock;

• each outstanding share of class Canada common stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of class C (series I) common stock based on the applicable conversion rate for the class Canada common stock;

• each outstanding share of class AP common stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of class C (series I) common stock based on the applicable conversion rate for the class AP common stock;

• each outstanding share of class LAC common stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of class C (series I) common stock based on the applicable conversion rate for the class LAC common stock; and

• each outstanding share of class CEMEA common stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of class C (series I) common stock based on the applicable conversion rate for the class CEMEA common stock.

The shares held by Visa Europe and VESI are not subject to the true-up, but are subject to a conversion ratio that has the effect of a conversion on a one-to-one basis as follows:

• each outstanding share of class EU (series I) common stock will automatically convert into one share of class C (series III) common stock;

• each outstanding share of class EU (series II) common stock will automatically convert into one share of class C (series II) common stock; and

• each outstanding share of class EU (series III) common stock will automatically convert into one share of class EU (series IV) common stock.

93

Equity Allocation to Members of Visa International in the Unincorporated Regions and Subsequent Adjustment

The initial allocation of shares of Visa Inc. among members of Visa International that are associated with Visa’s unincorporated regions will be made only to eligible members of Visa International in the unincorporated regions. To be eligible to receive Visa Inc. common stock of the applicable regional class, such members must:

• be a member of Visa International that is not sponsored by any other member of Visa International, Visa USA, Visa Europe or Visa Canada in one of the following categories of membership: Principal member, Visa Cash Program Participant member, Plus Program Participant member, Cheque Issuer member, Merchant Acquirer member, Travel Money Issuer member, Interlink Program Participant member or Cash Disbursement member;

• have an initial ownership percentage (based upon its historical net fees and total volumes as more fully described below) that is a positive number; and

• except in the case of cheque issuer members or travel money issuer members, be identified in the books and records of Visa International as being affiliated with the applicable unincorporated region.

At the restructuring closing, eligible members of Visa International that are affiliated with each unincorporated region will initially be allocated a number of shares of the applicable regional class of common stock (e.g., class AP common stock, class LAC common stock or class CEMEA common stock) based on the net fees and total volume of such member as a proportion of the aggregate net fees and total volumes of all eligible members associated with the applicable unincorporated region during the period beginning on October 2001 and ending on June 30, 2007. This initial allocation will be subject to subsequent adjustment based on the same net fees/total volume formula, but taking into account a longer measurement period, from October 2001 to the last day of the quarter end used in the measurement period for the true-up (or the preceding quarter end, if necessary, in order to accommodate the availability of the information needed to perform the calculations). This adjustment for member level share allocations within the unincorporated regions will be combined with that of the inter-regional true-up adjustment described above to produce a single conversion ratio for each eligible member within the unincorporated regions. This conversion ratio will be applied to the initial allocation of shares of each regional class of common stock in order to convert such shares into shares of class C common stock, the number of which may be more, less or the same, as the number of regional class shares initially allocated.

For Visa International members associated with the unincorporated regions, the formula for both the initial and final share allocation is based on a weighted combination of the net fees (i.e., net of rebates and incentives) paid by such members and the total volume reported by such members (with the net fees and total volume components being weighted equally for such purposes), as a proportion of the aggregate net fees and total volume of all eligible members affiliated with the applicable unincorporated region during the applicable measuring period. For purposes of these calculations:

• an eligible member will receive credit for the historical fees and total volume of its sponsored members, so long as such as the sponsored members are associated with the applicable unincorporated region;

• an eligible member will receive credit for the historical net fees and total volumes of other eligible members that have been acquired by such eligible member during the applicable measuring period (but excluding portfolio transfers), if the acquiree’s membership in Visa International has subsequently been terminated;

• with respect to portfolio transfers that occur during the measuring period, the net fees and total volume attributable to the period prior to the transfer will be allocated to the transferor and the net fees and total volume attributable to the period after the transfer will be allocated to the transferee;

• an eligible member that has “upgraded” its category of membership during the measuring period from the category of foreign branch licensee to the category of a principal member will receive credit for its historical net fees and total volume attributable to its former category of membership;

• an eligible member that has “upgraded” its category of membership during the measuring period from the category of sponsored member to the category of an eligible member will not receive credit for its

94

historical net fees and total volume prior to such upgrade, which will instead be allocated to its sponsoring member; and

• a member that has “downgraded” its membership during the measuring period from the category of principal member to a sponsored member category will not receive credit for its historical net fees and total volume, which will instead be allocated to its sponsoring member following the downgrade.

Retrospective Responsibility Plan

Our retrospective responsibility plan addresses potential liabilities arising from the litigation described under the heading “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Covered Litigation.”

Upon the completion of the initial public offering of Visa Inc. common stock, we will deposit a portion of the proceeds of the offering in an amount determined by the litigation committee (as described below) in an escrow account from which settlements of, or judgments in, the covered litigation would be paid. The funds available in the escrow may be used to satisfy the obligations of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and, in certain instances as described below, Visa Inc., whether those obligations result from a final judgment, a settlement that has been approved as required by the Visa U.S.A. bylaws, or obligations under a judgment sharing agreement.

In addition, upon completion of the initial public offering, the Visa Inc. board will determine what portion, if any, of the net proceeds of the offering will be retained for general working capital purposes. The net initial public offering proceeds less the sum of: (i) the initial escrow amount, (ii) any funds retained for general working capital purposes and (iii) the $1.146 billion that is designated to redeem the Visa Europe class C (series II) shares, will be used to redeem a portion of the shares of class B common stock and the shares of class C common stock other than the Visa Europe class C (series II) shares.

For the purpose of the redemption calculation below, the phrase “net proceeds” means the initial public offering proceeds net of underwriting discounts and commissions less the $1.146 billion that is designated to redeem the Visa Europe class C (series II) shares and less any funds retained by Visa Inc. for general working capital purposes. The net proceeds used to redeem the shares of class B common stock will equal: (i) their pro rata share of the net proceeds based on the total number of shares of class B and class C common stock issued and outstanding immediately after the closing of the initial public offering (excluding the shares of class C (series II) common stock and any shares held by a subsidiary of Visa Inc.) minus (ii) the initial amount of the escrow amount. The net proceeds used to redeem the shares of class C common stock will equal their pro rata share of the net proceeds (based on the total number of shares of class B and class C common stock issued and outstanding immediately after the closing of the initial public offering (excluding the shares of class C (series II) common stock and any shares held by a subsidiary of Visa Inc.)). The redemption price of these shares will equal the net initial public offering price per share. For a description of the redemption of the Visa Europe class C (series II) shares, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring—Shares Issued to Visa Europe.”

The shares of class B common stock that are retained by Visa U.S.A. members and that are not redeemed out of the proceeds of the initial public offering will be subject to dilution to the extent of the initial amount of the escrow account. This dilution of the shares of class B common stock will be accomplished through an adjustment to the conversion ratio of the shares of class B common stock. These shares will not be able to be converted into shares of class A common stock or, subject to limited exceptions, transferred until the later of the third anniversary of our initial public offering or the final resolution of the covered litigation. The shares of class C common stock held by members other than the Visa U.S.A. members will not be subject to this dilutive adjustment.

After the completion of our initial public offering and at the request of the litigation committee, we expect to conduct follow-on offerings of our shares of class A common stock, which we refer to as loss shares, if the

95

litigation committee deems it desirable to increase the escrow account. The proceeds from the sale of loss shares would then be deposited in the escrow account, and the shares of class B common stock would be subject to additional dilution to the extent of the loss shares through a concurrent adjustment to the conversion ratio of the class B shares. The litigation committee may not request that we sell loss shares in an underwritten offering more than twice in any 12-month period, and the proceeds from the requested offering must reasonably be expected to be at least $100,000,000. We will not offer loss shares in an amount that exceeds the number of shares of our class A common stock into which our issued and outstanding class B common stock is then convertible immediately prior to the offering.

Any amounts remaining in the escrow account on the date on which all of the covered litigation has been resolved will be released back to us, and the conversion ratio of the shares of class B common stock then outstanding will be adjusted in the holders’ favor through a formula based on the released escrow amount and the market price of our stock. For a description of the specific conversion ratio mechanism of the shares of class B common stock, see “Description of Capital Stock.”

The litigation committee will be established through a litigation management agreement among Visa Inc., Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and five individuals who are affiliated with, or acting for, certain Visa U.S.A. members. The litigation committee will: (i) determine the percent of initial public offering proceeds to be deposited in the escrow account; (ii) authorize the sale of loss shares, subject to Visa Inc.’s right to delay the filing or effectiveness of a registration statement under certain circumstances; and (iii) recommend or refer the cash payment portion of a proposed settlement of any covered litigation to the Visa U.S.A. board of directors.

Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Inc. expect to enter into a loss sharing agreement with some of the Visa U.S.A. members, which will become effective upon the restructuring closing. The loss sharing agreement provides that the Visa U.S.A. members that are parties to the agreement will be responsible for a proportionate share of the liabilities associated with the covered litigation that might otherwise be borne by Visa U.S.A or Visa International. The signatories will also be responsible for a proportionate share of the liabilities that might otherwise be borne by Visa Inc. if it is named as a defendant in the covered litigation unless a claim relates to the conduct of Visa Inc. after the restructuring (other than the restructuring itself or the initial public offering) or conduct of Visa Inc. that is not the mere continuation of conduct that is being challenged in the interchange litigation as of the closing of the restructuring. This proportionate share of each Visa U.S.A. member will be equal to such member’s membership proportion, as calculated in accordance with Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation.

The loss sharing agreement provides that, if we do not complete the initial public offering within 240 days after the completion of the restructuring, the members’ obligations under the agreement may be suspended until we have completed our initial public offering, at which point the members’ obligations under the agreements will be reinstated in full as if they had never been suspended. However, this 240-day period may be extended under certain circumstances.

In addition, Visa U.S.A. has entered into a judgment sharing agreement in connection with the claims brought by American Express, which we refer to as the Amex judgment sharing agreement, and Visa U.S.A. and Visa International plan to enter into a judgment sharing agreement in connection with the merchant interchange litigation, which we refer to as the interchange judgment sharing agreement. Under these judgment sharing agreements, the bank signatories, which are defendants in the American Express and/or merchant interchange litigation, will share in a judgment enforced against Visa U.S.A., and Visa U.S.A. will share in a judgment enforced against the other signatories. The bank signatories to the interchange judgment sharing agreement will also share in a judgment enforced against Visa International.

Under the judgment sharing agreements, each signatory other than Visa U.S.A. (and in the case of the interchange judgment sharing agreement, Visa International) will pay its membership proportion of the amount

96

of any final judgment executed against a signatory that is not allocated to the conduct of MasterCard under the terms of the agreements. Visa U.S.A. will pay the amount of such final judgment executed against a signatory that is not allocated to the conduct of MasterCard and that is not accounted for by the other signatories, although it will obtain reimbursement for such payments out of the escrow account. Visa International is not a party to the Amex judgment sharing agreement and has no obligation to share in a judgment enforced against another signatory under the interchange judgment sharing agreement. The Amex judgment sharing agreement does not address the sharing of the portion of any final judgment allocated to the conduct of MasterCard. Under the interchange judgment sharing agreement, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International will be reimbursed by the bank signatories for the full amount of any final judgment allocated to the conduct of MasterCard, but have no obligation to the other signatories with respect to the MasterCard portion of a final judgment.

In order to avoid a double payment as a result of the dilutive adjustment in the conversion ratio of the class B shares upon the establishment of the escrow account, Visa U.S.A. members that have made certain payments pursuant to a judgment sharing agreement or the loss sharing agreement prior to the completion of our initial public offering will be reimbursed from the initial escrow amount. The loss sharing agreement provides for the reimbursement of certain judgment sharing or loss sharing payments by Visa U.S.A. members. Pursuant to the loss sharing agreement, we will reimburse signatories that are also parties to a judgment sharing agreement and have paid their share of the Visa portion of a final judgment or settlement (i.e., not the portion allocated as a result of MasterCard’s conduct) pursuant to such judgment sharing agreement.

The members of Visa U.S.A. have indemnification obligations pursuant to Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements. After the closing of the restructuring, these indemnification obligations will continue with respect to the covered litigation, although we currently expect that, after the completion of our initial public offering, the initial escrow account and any additional proceeds from the sale of loss shares, which will subsequently be deposited into the escrow account, will be used first to resolve the covered litigation.

To the extent that the amount of the initial escrow and any additional sale of loss shares is insufficient to fully resolve the covered litigation and reimburse judgment sharing and loss sharing payments by Visa U.S.A.’s members, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to enforce the indemnification obligations of Visa U.S.A.’s members for such excess amount, including but not limited to enforcing indemnification obligations pursuant to the loss sharing agreement, Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements.

Shares Issued to Visa Europe

The consideration to be received by Visa Europe was the result of a negotiation between the regions participating in Visa Inc., on the one hand, and Visa Europe, on the other hand. Upon the completion of the restructuring, Visa Europe will receive 11.7% of the shares of Visa Inc. common stock, of which approximately 3.6% (plus any additional class EU (series II) or class C (series II) shares that may be issued in the future to Visa Europe), is redeemable for $1.146 billion (less any dividends or distributions paid on such shares and less the amount of any imputed interest on such dividends and distributions). This redemption may be effected at Visa Inc.’s election at any time after the later of the date that is 369 days after the effective date of the Inovant U.S. holdco merger and the completion of our initial public offering, or at Visa Europe’s election at any time after the later of the date that is 429 days after the effective date of the Inovant U.S. holdco merger and the date that is 60 days after the completion of our initial public offering.

Transaction Documents

In addition to the restructuring agreement, the parties have executed, or will execute, the following transaction documents in connection with the restructuring:

• Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will enter into a framework agreement and a put-call option agreement, as described herein. These agreements will be entered into contemporaneously with, and as a condition to,

97

the closing of the restructuring. For a more detailed description of these agreements, see “Material Contracts—The Framework Agreement” and “—The Put-Call Option Agreement;”

• (i) Visa Inc., Visa International and Visa Canada will enter into a regional services agreement; (ii) Visa Canada and each member of Visa Canada will enter into a services agreement; (iii) Visa Canada, Visa International and the members of Visa Canada will enter into a trademark agreement; and (iv) Visa Inc. and the members of Visa Canada will enter into a support agreement, each described herein. Except for the services agreement among Visa Inc., Visa International and Visa Canada (which will be entered into prior to the closing of the restructuring), these agreements will be entered into contemporaneously with, and as a condition to, the closing of the restructuring; and

• (i) Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Inc. and certain members of Visa U.S.A. will enter into a loss sharing agreement, as described herein; (ii) Visa U.S.A., Visa Inc. and each bank party named as a defendant in any of the covered litigation will enter into a judgment sharing agreement; and (iii) Visa Inc., Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and the members of the litigation committee will enter into a litigation management agreement. These agreements are expected to be entered into as promptly as practicable after the signing of the restructuring agreement. For a more detailed description of these agreements, see “Material Contracts—The Loss Sharing Agreement.”

Representations and Warranties

Each party to the restructuring agreement represented and warranted, severally (as to itself only) and not jointly, to each of the other parties, except as set forth in separate disclosure letters delivered by each such party to each other party with regard to the following matters: (i) due organization, good standing and corporate power; (ii) authorization and validity of the agreement; (iii) consents and approvals; (iv) no violations; (v) membership; (vi) litigation; (vii) disclosure; (viii) opinions of financial advisors; (ix) broker’s or finder’s fees; and (x) exclusivity of representations.

Covenants

Prior to the closing of the restructuring, each party to the restructuring agreement agrees to: (i) conduct its operations only in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; (ii) use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain requisite consents; (iii) make required filings under competition laws; (iv) cooperate to assist Visa Inc. in the preparation and filing with the SEC of a registration statement on Form S-4 covering the securities to be issued in the restructuring; (v) use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the requisite member and shareholder approval required in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by the restructuring agreement; (vi) bear taxes incurred by such party in connection with the restructuring, except as expressly contemplated in the transaction documents; and (vii) develop internal Visa regional operating guidelines based on agreed principles.

Release; Indemnity

The restructuring agreement provides that, effective upon the restructuring closing, Visa Inc., Visa International and Visa U.S.A. irrevocably release each of: (i) Visa Europe, Visa Canada and each other current or former member of Visa International (including Visa U.S.A., subject only to such obligations as Visa U.S.A. may have by reason of any judgment sharing agreement or loss sharing agreement it has entered into with respect to any covered litigation); (ii) each current or former member, member of a member, stockholder or other holder of any equity interest in any of the foregoing persons (subject only to such obligations as any members of Visa U.S.A. may have with respect to any covered litigation by reason of any provisions of the transaction documents, including the restated Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation or the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of Visa U.S.A.); (iii) each predecessor, successor, subsidiary, division, department, affiliate, officer, director, employee and assignee of the foregoing persons; and (iv) each non-member special licensee approved for participation in the Visa system by the board of directors of Visa International, from any liability in respect of any claim that could be asserted against such released persons by Visa Inc. or Visa International in connection with the covered litigation, including any such claim pursuant to Section 2.11 or Section 15.06 of the bylaws of Visa International,

98

Section 1.11 of the operating regulations of Visa International or Section 1.7 of the operating regulations of Visa Canada. The restructuring agreement also provides that the these released claims do not include any liabilities arising from the covered litigation that are the subject of obligations of Visa U.S.A. or its members under the interchange judgment sharing agreement or the Amex judgment sharing agreement or the other transaction documents, including the restated Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation, the restated bylaws of Visa Inc. or the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of Visa U.S.A. or Visa International.

In addition, Visa Inc. has agreed in the restructuring agreement to indemnify each current and former member of Visa International, Visa Europe and Visa Canada, from and after the closing of the restructuring, against any liabilities incurred by such persons with respect to any claim asserted in a U.S. court by a U.S. merchant or current plaintiff in the covered litigation against such person that is based on the same or substantially similar factual allegations or claims for relief asserted in the covered litigation.

Termination of Regional Group Member

The restructuring agreement provides that, upon the closing of the restructuring, Visa Europe’s membership in Visa International will terminate, Visa Europe will cease to be a member of Visa International, and Visa Europe shall cease to have any liability or obligation under its regional group member agreement with Visa International or any other documents, other than as provided in the transaction documents relating to the restructuring.

Regional Directors

The restructuring agreement provides that, after the restructuring, each of the regional directors of Visa Inc. will be a Class I director as provided in our restated certificate of incorporation, serving an initial term that expires on the first anniversary of the closing of the restructuring. Upon the expiration of the initial term of the regional directors, the parties to the restructuring agreement have agreed to take any actions necessary to cause the regional directors to be re-nominated to a second term as a director of Visa Inc. (which will expire on the fourth anniversary of the closing of the restructuring) provided that he or she continues to satisfy the eligibility requirements for our regional directors described in our certificate of incorporation.

Canada Transaction Documents

Each of Visa Inc., Visa International and Visa Canada agreed in the restructuring agreement to cooperate in good faith and use its respective commercially reasonable efforts to negotiate, as soon as practicable after the date of the restructuring agreement, mutually acceptable forms of the following documents (which we refer to as the Canada transaction documents):

• a services agreement to be entered into before the restructuring closing among Visa Inc., Visa International and Visa Canada, granting to Visa Canada the necessary rights to allow Visa Canada to enter into a Canadian services agreement with each member of Visa Canada;

• a services agreement to be entered into at the restructuring closing between Visa Canada and each of the members of Visa Canada to evidence, consolidate and restate the continuation of the existing commercial rights of Visa Canada members from and after the restructuring closing;

• a trademark agreement to be entered into at the restructuring closing among Visa International, Visa Canada and each member of Visa Canada regarding the existing trademark rights of Visa Canada members; and

• a support agreement among Visa Inc., and members of Visa Canada, supporting the obligations of Visa Canada pursuant to each services agreement between Visa Canada and its members.

99

Conditions to Restructuring Closing

The respective obligations of each party to effect the restructuring are subject to the satisfaction of each of the following conditions, any of which (other than the member or stockholder consents described below) may be waived by the party or parties entitled to the benefit of the condition:

• the restructuring, and the specific actions to be taken by the applicable parties to the restructuring agreement, will have been approved by the members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe, and by the sole stockholders or members (as applicable) of Visa Inc., Inovant U.S. holdco, VI merger sub and Visa U.S.A. merger sub;

• any waiting periods under applicable competition laws will have expired or been terminated;

• all consents and approvals of any governmental authority necessary to permit the parties to consummate the restructuring will have been duly obtained, made or given;

• no temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or other order will have been issued by any governmental authority;

• no law or governmental order that prohibits or enjoins the restructuring will have been enacted or entered by any governmental authority;

• each other transaction document, including the Canada transaction documents, will have been executed and delivered by each of the parties thereto, and each of the covenants to be performed prior to the closing of the restructuring will have been performed;

• the registration statement on Form S-4 will have become effective under the Securities Act;

• certain amendments to the articles of association of Visa Europe in connection with the restructuring will have been approved and adopted by the members of Visa Europe, and Visa Europe will have delivered to Visa Inc. a legal opinion regarding the effectiveness of such amendments;

• the certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. will have been amended and restated in its entirety in the form attached as Annex C and the board of directors of Visa Inc. will have adopted the charters of the audit committee, nominating/corporate governance committee and the compensation committee of the Visa Inc. board of directors;

• the board of directors of Visa Inc. will be comprised of not less than 17 directors, at least 10 of whom will be independent directors;

• the assets of Visa U.S.A. owned indirectly by Visa Inc. in connection with the restructuring will represent at least 60% of the capital and surplus of Visa Inc. on a consolidated pro forma basis after giving effect to the closing of the restructuring;

• section 1.11 of the operating regulations of Visa International will have been amended in order to eliminate the right of Visa International to obtain indemnification from any member of Visa International, except for indemnifications with respect to the actions or omissions of such member or its affiliates after the closing of the restructuring; and

• certain other specified consents, approvals, permits, legal opinions, certificates and other requirements will have been obtained prior to the restructuring closing date.

In addition to the closing conditions above:

• Visa Europe’s obligation to effect the restructuring is subject to: (i) the amendment of a certain Tax Deed and Tax Indemnification Agreement dated July 1, 2004, among Visa International, Visa Europe and VESI in the form attached to the restructuring agreement and certain provisions of other agreements entered into in connection with the 2004 spin-off of Visa Europe; and (ii) Visa Europe and

100

VESI shall have received from HM Revenue and Customs a tax clearance satisfactory to them in their reasonable discretion with respect to the treatment of the restructuring under English law; and

• Visa Canada’s obligation to effect the restructuring is subject to the receipt by Visa Canada and its members of an advance income tax ruling from the Canada Revenue Agency with respect to the income tax consequences to Visa Canada and its members of the restructuring, in form and substance acceptable to Visa Canada in its reasonable discretion.

Closing

Unless the restructuring agreement is terminated as described below under “—Grounds for Termination,” and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of each of the conditions described above under “—Conditions to Restructuring Closing” the restructuring will commence at 10:00 a.m. as soon as practicable after the last of such conditions is satisfied or waived.

Grounds for Termination

The restructuring agreement may be terminated by a party to the restructuring at any time before the closing of the restructuring only:

• by mutual written consent of all of the parties to the restructuring agreement;

• by any of the parties to the restructuring agreement in the event of an injunction prohibiting the restructuring;

• by any party to the restructuring agreement, in the event that applicable member approval with respect to any other party to the agreement has not been obtained;

• by any party to the restructuring agreement, if the closing of the restructuring has not occurred on or before June 30, 2008; or

• by the mutual written consent of Visa Inc., Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Europe, if the definitive form of each of the Canada transaction documents has not been mutually agreed prior to October 1, 2007.

Effect of Termination

In the event of any termination of the restructuring agreement, it will become void and have no effect, and there will be no liability thereunder on the part of any party to the other party or parties.

101

THE VISA INC. 2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

The equity incentive plan is intended to promote our long-term success and increase stockholder value by attracting, motivating, and retaining our non-employee directors, officers, employees and consultants and those of our subsidiaries and affiliates. To achieve this purpose, the equity incentive plan allows the flexibility to grant or award stock options, stock appreciation rights or SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance unit awards, performance share awards, cash-based awards and other stock-based awards to eligible persons.

The equity incentive plan would allow us to grant these stock-based incentive awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants covering a total of up to      shares of common stock. No awards have been made under the equity incentive plan.

The equity incentive plan will become effective on the date it has been approved by the affirmative vote of both: (a) the members holding membership interests in Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, which, assuming the completion of the restructuring, would represent a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Visa Inc. immediately after the closing; and (b) Visa International, the sole stockholder of Visa Inc. prior to the restructuring.

The principal features of the equity incentive plan are summarized below. Members should read the equity incentive plan for a full statement of its legal terms and conditions. The full text of the equity incentive plan is available at Annex L in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Administration. The compensation committee of our board of directors will have discretionary authority to operate, manage and administer the equity incentive plan in accordance with its terms. The compensation committee will determine the non-employee directors, employees and consultants who will be granted awards under the equity incentive plan, the size and types of awards, the terms and conditions of awards and the form and content of the award agreements representing awards. The compensation committee will be authorized to establish, administer and waive terms, conditions and performance goals of outstanding awards and to accelerate the vesting or exercisability of awards, in each case, subject to limitations contained in the equity incentive plan. The compensation committee will interpret the equity incentive plan and award agreements and will have authority to correct any defects, supply any omissions and reconcile any inconsistencies in the equity incentive plan and/or any award agreements. The compensation committee’s decisions and actions concerning the equity incentive plan will be final and conclusive. Within the limitations of the equity incentive plan and applicable law, the compensation committee may delegate its responsibilities under the equity incentive plan to persons selected by it, and our board of directors will be permitted to exercise all of the compensation committee’s powers under the equity incentive plan.

We intend to form a compensation committee after the completion of the restructuring. The compensation committee will be comprised of at least three members of our board of directors, each of whom will be selected by our board of directors and will satisfy independence criteria established by our board of directors and additional regulatory requirements, including the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

Shares Subject to the Equity Incentive Plan. A maximum of      shares of common stock would be available for delivery under the equity incentive plan, subject to adjustment for certain changes in our capital structure described below under “—Changes in Capital.” The shares of common stock that may be issued under the equity incentive plan will be either authorized and unissued shares, which will not be subject to preemptive rights, or previously issued shares that have been reacquired and are held as treasury stock. Any shares subject to an award or portion of an award that is forfeited, terminated or settled for cash or otherwise expires will be available for future awards under the equity incentive plan. If we or one of our subsidiaries acquires or combines with another

102

company, any awards that may be granted under the equity incentive plan in substitution or exchange for outstanding stock options or other awards of that other company will not reduce the shares available for issuance under the equity incentive plan, but the shares available for incentive stock options granted under the equity incentive plan will be limited to the maximum number of shares available for delivery under the equity incentive plan stated above.

Participation. The compensation committee may grant awards under the equity incentive plan to our employees and consultants and those of our eligible subsidiaries and affiliates as well as our non-employee directors. However, only our employees and those of our subsidiaries will be eligible to receive incentive stock options under the equity incentive plan.

No awards will be granted under the equity incentive plan unless the equity incentive plan is approved by the members and by Visa International, as described above. Because it will be within the compensation committee’s discretion to determine which employees and directors will receive awards under the equity incentive plan and the types and amounts of those awards, it is not possible at present to specify the benefits that would be received under the equity incentive plan by directors, executive officers and other employees if the equity incentive plan is properly approved. In addition, the benefits or amounts that would have been received by, or allocated to, those persons for the last completed fiscal year if the equity incentive plan had been in effect cannot be determined.

Stock Options. A stock option is the right to purchase a specified number of shares of common stock in the future at a specified exercise price and subject to the other terms and conditions specified in the option agreement and the equity incentive plan. Stock options granted under the equity incentive plan will be either incentive stock options, which may be eligible for special tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or options other than incentive stock options, which are referred to as nonqualified stock options, as determined by the compensation committee and stated in the option agreement. The number of shares covered by each option will be determined by the compensation committee. The exercise price of each option is set by the compensation committee but cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock at the time of grant, or, in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% or more stockholder of Visa Inc., 110% of that fair market value. Options granted under the equity incentive plan in substitution or exchange for options or awards of another company involved in a corporate transaction with us or a subsidiary will have an exercise price that is intended to preserve the economic value of the award that is replaced. The phrase fair market value is generally defined by the equity incentive plan as the last sale price reported for the common stock on an established securities market on the date for which fair market value is being determined. The fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of our initial public offering is defined as the price to the public in the final prospectus we file with the SEC. The exercise price of any stock options granted under the equity incentive plan may be paid in cash, shares of common stock already owned by the option holder or any other method that may be approved by the compensation committee, such as a cashless broker-assisted exercise, that complies with law.

Options will become exercisable and expire at the times and on the terms established by the compensation committee. An option cannot be exercised later than the tenth anniversary of the grant date; however, if the exercise of an option on its scheduled expiration date would violate law, the option may be extended until its exercise would not violate law. Options generally terminate when the holder’s employment or service with us and our affiliates terminates unless otherwise determined by the compensation committee.

Stock Appreciation Rights. SARs may be granted under the equity incentive plan alone or together with specific stock options granted under the equity incentive plan. SARs are awards that, upon their exercise, give a participant the right to receive from us an amount equal to: (1) the number of shares for which the SAR is exercised multiplied by (2) the excess of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the exercise date over the grant price of the SAR. The grant price of a SAR cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date of such SAR. A SAR may be settled in cash, shares or a combination of cash and shares, as determined by the compensation committee. SARs will become exercisable and expire at the

103

times and on the terms established by the compensation committee, subject to the same maximum time limits as are applicable to options granted under the equity incentive plan. However, a SAR granted with an option will be exercisable and terminate when the related option is exercisable and terminates. Such an option will no longer be exercisable to the extent that the holder exercises the related SAR. Likewise, a SAR will not be exercisable to the extent that the related option is exercised. The number of shares covered by each SAR will be determined by the compensation committee.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock awards are shares of common stock that are awarded to a participant subject to the satisfaction of the terms and conditions established by the compensation committee. Until the applicable restrictions lapse, shares of restricted stock are subject to forfeiture and may not be sold, assigned, pledged or otherwise disposed of by the participant who holds those shares. Restricted stock units are denominated in units of shares of our common stock, except that no shares are actually issued to the participant on the grant date. When a restricted stock unit award vests, the participant is entitled to receive shares of our common stock, a cash payment based on the value of shares of common stock or a combination of shares and cash. Vesting of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units may be based on continued employment or service and/or satisfaction of performance goals or other conditions established by the compensation committee. A recipient of restricted stock will have the rights of a stockholder during the restriction period, including the right to receive any dividends, which may be subject to the same restrictions as the restricted stock, unless the compensation committee provides otherwise in the grant. A recipient of restricted stock units will have none of the rights of a stockholder unless and until shares are actually delivered to the participant. The number of shares of restricted stock and/or restricted stock units granted to a participant will be determined by the compensation committee. Upon termination of employment or a period of service, or failure to satisfy other vesting conditions, a participant’s unvested shares of restricted stock and unvested restricted stock units are forfeited unless the participant’s award agreement, or the compensation committee, provides otherwise.

Performance Units, Performance Shares and Cash-based Awards. Performance units, performance shares and cash-based awards granted to a participant are amounts credited to a bookkeeping account established for the participant. A performance unit has an initial value that is established by the compensation committee at the time of its grant. A performance share has an initial value equal to the fair market value of a share of the common stock on the date of grant. Each cash-based award has a value that is established by the compensation committee at the time of its grant. The number of performance units, performance shares and cash-based awards granted to a participant will be determined by the compensation committee. Whether a performance unit, performance share or cash-based award actually will result in a payment to a participant will depend upon the extent to which performance goals or other conditions established by the compensation committee are satisfied. After a performance unit, performance share or cash-based award has vested, the participant will be entitled to receive a payout of cash, shares of common stock or a combination thereof, as determined by the compensation committee. A participant’s award agreement describes the effect of a termination of employment on the participant’s performance units, performance shares or cash-based award.

Other Stock-based Awards. The compensation committee may grant to participants other stock-based awards under the equity incentive plan, which are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, shares of common stock. The form of any other stock-based awards will be determined by the compensation committee, and may include a grant or sale of unrestricted shares of common stock. The number of shares of common stock related to an other stock-based award will be determined by the compensation committee. Other stock-based awards may be paid in shares of common stock or cash, according to the award agreement. The terms and conditions, including vesting conditions, will be established by the compensation committee when the award is made. The compensation committee will determine the effect of a termination of employment or service on a participant’s other stock-based awards.

Dividend Equivalents. The compensation committee may provide for the payment of dividend equivalents with respect to shares of common stock subject to an award, such as restricted stock units, that have not actually been issued under that award.

104

Transferability of Awards. Options, SARs, unvested restricted stock, and other awards under the equity incentive plan generally may not be sold or otherwise transferred except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or to the designated beneficiary of a deceased participant. The compensation committee may permit awards other than incentive stock options and any related SARs to be transferred, subject to any specified conditions or limitations, but awards may not be transferred for value or other consideration without stockholder approval.

Change of Control. In the event of a change of control of us (as defined in the equity incentive plan), but subject to any contrary law or rule or provision of an award agreement that is in effect under the equity incentive plan prior to the change of control, the compensation committee may, in its discretion, provide that: (a) outstanding options, SARs and other stock-based awards will become exercisable; (b) restrictions applicable to outstanding restricted stock unit awards, restricted stock awards and other stock-based awards will lapse; (c) outstanding awards will become vested; (d) any outstanding awards otherwise payable on a deferred basis will be paid or distributed; (e) outstanding performance-based awards will be deemed to have been earned for any performance period prior to the effective date of the change of control; (f) there will be substituted for shares subject to options or awards outstanding under the equity incentive plan shares or other securities of the surviving or successor corporation, or another corporate party to the change of control transaction, with approximately the same value, or cash out outstanding options or awards based on the highest value of the consideration received for our common stock in that transaction, or the highest fair market value of our common stock during the 30 business days immediately prior to the closing or expiration date of the change of control transaction, reduced by the exercise price or grant price of the award, if applicable; and (g) any options or other awards cannot be exercised after or will be terminated after a change of control transaction. However, if: (1) we or the surviving or successor corporation to us, or any other corporate party to the change of control transaction, does not affirm, assume, or replace outstanding options, SARs and other awards under the equity incentive plan in a manner that preserves those awards’ existing compensation element; (2) we undergo a liquidation; or (3) an equity incentive plan participant’s employment is terminated after the change of control without cause or by the participant with good reason, then, generally, all outstanding options, SARs and other awards not so affirmed, assumed or replaced, or outstanding at the time of a liquidation, or, in the case of a participant’s termination of employment as described above, all of any affected participant’s outstanding options, SARs and other awards, will become fully vested, and, if applicable, exercisable or payable and deemed fully earned (based on the greater of target or actual achievement). However, depending on the nature of the change of control transaction, payment of certain awards may be delayed to comply with section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Changes in Capital. In the event of a corporate event or transaction, such as a stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation or spin-off, the compensation committee will substitute or adjust the number, class and kind of securities that can be delivered under the equity incentive plan and outstanding awards, and the price, as applicable, of securities subject to awards outstanding under the equity incentive plan in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of participants’ rights under the equity incentive plan.

Amendment and Termination. Our board of directors may amend, alter, suspend or terminate the equity incentive plan. However, our board of directors will be required to obtain approval of the stockholders, if such approval is required by any applicable law or rule, of any amendment of the equity incentive plan that would: (a) increase the maximum number of shares of the common stock that may be sold or awarded under the equity incentive plan, except in the event of certain changes in our capital, as described above under “—Changes in Capital;” (b) decrease the minimum option exercise price or SAR grant price required by the equity incentive plan, except in the event of certain changes in our capital as described above under “—Changes in Capital;” (c) change the class of persons eligible to receive awards under the equity incentive plan; (d) extend the duration of the equity incentive plan or the exercise period of any options or SARs granted under the equity incentive plan; or (f) otherwise require stockholder approval to comply with applicable laws or rules.

The compensation committee may amend outstanding awards. However, no amendment or termination of the equity incentive plan or amendment of outstanding awards may materially impair the previously accrued rights of a participant under any outstanding award without his or her written consent, unless the board of

105

directors or the compensation committee determines that the amendment is necessary or advisable to comply with laws, regulations, rules or accounting standards. Additionally, the provisions of the equity incentive plan described above under “—Change of Control” may not be amended, terminated or modified on or after the date of a change of control to materially impair any participant’s outstanding award without that participant’s written consent. The board of directors or the compensation committee will adjust awards under the equity incentive plan in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events affecting us or our financial statements or changes in laws, regulations or accounting principles if the board of directors or the compensation committee determines that those adjustments are necessary to prevent dilution or enlargement of intended benefits under the equity incentive plan.

The equity incentive plan prohibits us from reducing the exercise price or grant price of an outstanding stock option or SAR or replacing an outstanding stock option or SAR that has an exercise price or grant price above the value of the common stock with a new option or SAR that has a lower exercise price or grant price, or with any other type of new award other than as described under “—Changes in Capital” above, without first obtaining stockholder approval.

Duration of Equity Incentive Plan. If the equity incentive plan is approved by the members and Visa International, the equity incentive plan will become effective on the date that the plan has been approved by both the members and Visa International and will continue in effect until all shares of the common stock available under the equity incentive plan are delivered and all restrictions on those shares have lapsed, unless the equity incentive plan is terminated earlier by our board of directors. No awards may be granted under the equity incentive plan on or after ten years from the effective date of the equity incentive plan.

Non-United States Participants. The compensation committee may authorize appropriate procedures and subplans and grant awards or substitutes for awards to permit eligible individuals who are employed outside the United States to participate in the equity incentive plan or to otherwise conform to the laws or practices of non-U.S. jurisdictions.

Tax Withholding Obligations. The equity incentive plan authorizes us and our affiliates to withhold all applicable taxes from any award or payment under the equity incentive plan and to take other actions necessary or appropriate to satisfy those tax obligations.

Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences. The following is a brief summary of certain significant United States Federal income tax consequences, under the Internal Revenue Code, as in effect on the date of this summary, applicable to us and participants in connection with awards under the equity incentive plan. This summary assumes that all awards will be exempt from, or comply with, the rules under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code regarding nonqualified deferred compensation. If an award constitutes nonqualified deferred compensation and fails to comply with Internal Revenue Code section 409A, the award will be subject to immediate taxation and tax penalties in the year the award vests. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive, and, among other things, does not describe state, local or non-United States tax consequences, or the effect of gift, estate or inheritance taxes. References to “the Company” in this summary of tax consequences mean Visa Inc., or any subsidiary or affiliate of Visa Inc. that employs or receives the services of a recipient of an award under the equity incentive plan, as the case may be.

The grant of options under the equity incentive plan will not result in taxable income to the recipient of the option or an income tax deduction for the Company. However, the transfer of common stock to an option holder upon exercise of his or her option may or may not give rise to taxable income to the option holder and a tax deduction for the Company depending upon whether such option is a nonqualified stock option or an incentive stock option.

The exercise of a nonqualified stock option by an option holder generally results in immediate recognition of taxable ordinary income by the option holder and a corresponding tax deduction for the Company in the

106

amount by which the fair market value of the shares of common stock purchased, on the date of such exercise, exceeds the aggregate exercise price paid. Any appreciation or depreciation in the fair market value of those shares after the exercise date will generally result in a capital gain or loss to the holder at the time he or she disposes of those shares.

The exercise of an incentive stock option by the option holder is exempt from income tax, although not from the alternative minimum tax, and does not result in a tax deduction for the Company if the holder has been an employee of the Company at all times beginning with the option grant date and ending three months before the date the holder exercises the option (or twelve months in the case of termination of employment due to disability). If the option holder has not been so employed during that time, the holder will be taxed as described above for nonqualified stock options. If the option holder disposes of the shares purchased more than two years after the option was granted and more than one year after the option was exercised, then the option holder will recognize any gain or loss upon disposition of those shares as capital gain or loss. However, if the option holder disposes of the shares prior to satisfying these holding periods (known as a “disqualifying disposition”), the option holder will be obligated to report as taxable ordinary income for the year in which that disposition occurs the excess, with certain adjustments, of the fair market value of the shares disposed of, on the date the incentive stock option was exercised, over the exercise price paid for those shares. The Company would be entitled to a tax deduction equal to that amount of ordinary income reported by the option holder. Any additional gain realized by the option holder on the disqualifying disposition would be capital gain. If the total amount realized in a disqualifying disposition is less than the exercise price of the incentive stock option, the difference would be a capital loss for the holder.

The granting of SARs does not result in taxable income to the recipient of a SAR or a tax deduction for the Company. Upon exercise of a SAR, the amount of any cash the participant receives and the fair market value as of the exercise date of any common stock received are taxable to the participant as ordinary income and deductible by the Company.

A participant will not recognize any taxable income upon the award of shares of restricted stock, which are not transferable and are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Dividends paid with respect to restricted stock prior to the lapse of restrictions applicable to that stock will be taxable as compensation income to the participant. Generally, the participant will recognize taxable ordinary income at the first time those shares become transferable or are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, in an amount equal to the fair market value of those shares when the restrictions lapse. However, a participant may elect to recognize taxable ordinary income upon the award date of restricted stock based on the fair market value of the shares of common stock subject to the award on the date of the award. If a participant makes that election, any dividends paid with respect to that restricted stock will not be treated as compensation income, but rather as dividend income, and the participant will not recognize additional taxable income when the restrictions applicable to his or her restricted stock award lapse. Assuming compliance with the applicable tax withholding and reporting requirements, the Company will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by a participant in connection with his or her restricted stock award in the Company’s taxable year in which that participant recognizes that ordinary income.

The granting of restricted stock units does not result in taxable income to the recipient of a restricted stock unit or a tax deduction for the Company. The amount of cash paid or the then-current fair market value of the common stock received upon settlement of the restricted stock units is taxable to the recipient as ordinary income and deductible by the Company.

The granting of a performance unit, performance share, cash-based award, other stock-based award or dividend equivalent right generally should not result in the recognition of taxable income by the recipient or a tax deduction by the Company. The payment or settlement of a performance unit, performance share, cash-based award, other stock-based award or dividend equivalent right should generally result in immediate recognition of taxable ordinary income by the recipient equal to the amount of any cash paid or the then-current fair market

107

value of the shares of common stock received, and a corresponding tax deduction by the Company. If the shares covered by the award are not transferable and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the tax consequences to the participant and the Company will be similar to the tax consequences of restricted stock awards, described above. If the award consists of unrestricted shares of common stock, the recipient of those shares will immediately recognize as taxable ordinary income the fair market value of those shares on the date of the award, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction.

Under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, once the Company becomes a publicly held corporation, the Company may be limited as to Federal income tax deductions to the extent that total annual compensation in excess of $1 million is paid to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer or any one of the Company’s other four highest paid executive officers who are employed by the Company on the last day of the Company’s taxable year. In general, however, certain “performance-based compensation” the material terms of which are disclosed to and approved by our stockholders would not be subject to this limitation on deductibility. Compensation relating to awards under the equity incentive plan that are made until our first annual meeting of stockholders that occurs in 2011 are exempt from the deduction limitations otherwise imposed by section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code if the plan is not materially modified during this period. Any awards that are made under the equity incentive plan after this period may be subject to this deduction limitation if the equity incentive plan is not amended and approved by our stockholders in a manner that complies with the exception for performance-based compensation under section 162(m).

Under certain circumstances, accelerated vesting, exercise or payment of awards under the equity incentive plan in connection with a “change of control” of the Company might be deemed an “excess parachute payment” for purposes of the golden parachute payment provisions of section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. To the extent it is so considered, the participant holding the award would be subject to an excise tax equal to 20 percent of the amount of the excess parachute payment, and the Company would be denied a tax deduction for the excess parachute payment.

108

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been prepared by applying pro forma adjustments to the historical unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2007, the historical audited consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 and the historical unaudited interim consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2007, of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus, to give pro forma effect to the restructuring under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which we refer to as U.S. GAAP for financial accounting reporting purposes.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 gives effect to the restructuring as if it had occurred on March 31, 2007. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations give effect to the restructuring as if it had occurred on October 1, 2005.

We have applied pro forma adjustments to reflect the following:

• Visa Inc. will participate in the restructuring, which includes a series of integrated transactions involving Visa U.S.A., Visa International, Visa Canada and Inovant. Each entity will become a subsidiary of Visa Inc., with members of each entity transferring their membership interests in exchange for shares of common stock of Visa Inc. The restructuring will be accounted for as a purchase under the guidelines of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 141 “Business Combinations” with Visa U.S.A. deemed to be the accounting acquirer of Visa International and Visa Canada, including their respective minority interest in Inovant;

• Visa Europe will remain owned and governed by its European member banks. Under the restructuring agreement, Visa Europe will hold an approximate 11.7% equity ownership interest in Visa Inc. of which 8.10% are represented by shares of class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock and 3.6% are represented by shares of class EU (series II) common stock in exchange for both its membership interests in Visa International and its ownership interest in Inovant. Further, Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will enter into a framework agreement, which provides for trademark and technology licenses and bilateral services (see Note 3 “Visa Europe Transaction” to these unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information for more information); and

• Elimination of historical transaction costs associated with the restructuring incurred by Visa International during the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, which would have been incurred prior to the restructuring that is assumed to have occurred on October 1, 2005 for the purposes of presenting the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations.

Assumptions underlying the pro forma adjustments are described in the accompanying notes, which should be read in conjunction with the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is provided for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the financial position or results of operations that would have actually been reported had the proposed restructuring occurred on the assumed dates indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of our future financial position or results of operations as of or for any future date or periods.

The pro forma information presented, including allocations of purchase price, is based on preliminary estimates of the fair values of assets to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed, available information and assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The actual adjustments to our historical combined financial statements upon the closing of the restructuring will be based on the net assets acquired at that date and will depend on a number of factors, including completion of the appraisal of the net assets acquired upon consummation of the restructuring. Therefore, the actual entries we will record to account for the restructuring will differ from the pro forma adjustments presented below.

109

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information should be read in conjunction with the following:

• The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007;

• The audited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. as of and for the year ended September 30, 2006;

• The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa International as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007;

• The audited consolidated financial statements of Visa International as of and for the year ended September 30, 2006;

• The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007; and

• The audited consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada as of and for the year ended September 30, 2006.

The above referenced financial statements are included elsewhere in the proxy statement-prospectus. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information should also be read in conjunction with the information contained in “Risk Factors,” “Capitalization,” “Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data” of each of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for each of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada.

The historical financial information for Visa Canada to which pro forma adjustments were applied was prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada, which we refer to as Canadian GAAP and reconciled to U.S. GAAP. See Note 11 “Reconciliation of Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles” to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Visa Canada as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and Note 12 “Reconciliation of Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles” to the audited consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada as of and for the year ended September 30, 2006 for a reconciliation of the historical financial position and results of operations of Visa Canada, in Canadian dollars, between U.S. and Canadian GAAP.

110

VISA INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET

AS OF MARCH 31, 2007

(in thousands)

	Historical
					Note 2												Unaudited Pro Forma Visa Inc.
	Visa U.S.A.		Visa International		Visa Canada		Combination Adjustments				Combined Subtotal		Pro Forma Adjustments
Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	386,042	$	604,362	$	15,255	$	9,781		C	$	1,015,440	$	—			$	1,015,440
Trading Assets		—		95,747		—		(95,747	)	D		—		—				—
Investment Securities, Available for Sale		1,026,199		1,526		5,879		95,747		D		1,129,351		—				1,129,351
Accounts Receivable		217,975		81,916		4,467		(20,624	)	A		271,420		—				271,420
								(12,314	)	B								—
Settlement Receivables		36,416		487,746		—		—				524,162		—				524,162
Member Collateral		—		304,836		—		49,361		A		354,197		—				354,197
Current Portion of Volume and Support Agreement		90,536		—		—		42,615		A		133,151		—				133,151
Current Portion of Deferred Tax Assets		149,381		41,633		—		—				191,014		(1,546	)	L		189,468
Prepaid and Other Current Assets		134,055		108,777		1,371		(71,352	)	A		162,852		(5,952	)	I		156,900
								(13,349	)	B								—
								3,350		C
Total Current Assets		2,040,604		1,726,543		26,972		(12,532	)			3,781,587		(7,498	)			3,774,089
Investment Securities, Available-for-Sale		355,488		—		—		—				355,488		—				355,488
Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures		—		24,252		—		(24,252	)	A		—		—				—
Investment in Inovant LLC		—		—		7,099		(7,099	)	B		—		—				—
Volume and Support Agreements		41,202		—		—		—				41,202		—				41,202
Investment in Visa International		210,229		—		—		(210,229	)	B		—		—				—
Premises and Equipment, net		—		156,171				(156,171	)	A		—		—				—
Facilities, Equipment and Software, net		268,472		—		4,179		126,075		A		482,077		89,567		E		571,644
								83,351		C
Intangibles, net		—		38,519		—		(38,519	)	A		—		—
Trademark		—		—		—		—						2,451,040		G		2,451,040
Customer Relationships		—		—		—		—						5,375,170		G		5,375,170
European Franchise Right		—		—		—		—						1,415,000		G		1,415,000
Technology		—		—		—		67,848		A		67,848		175,399		G		243,247
Deferred Tax Assets		237,533		17,471		1,337		—				256,341		(256,341	)	M		—
Other Investments		—		—		—		30,992		A		30,992		323,569		F		354,561
Other Assets		98,948		59,736		82		(5,973	)	A		64,785		—				64,785
								(88,577	)	B
								569		C
Goodwill		—		—		—		—				—		9,339,068		H		9,339,068
Total Assets	$	3,252,476	$	2,022,692	$	39,669	$	(234,517	)		$	5,080,320	$	18,904,974			$	23,985,294
Liabilities
Accounts Payable	$	64,157	$	—	$	4,020	$	12,045		A	$	80,459		—			$	80,459
								237		C
Trade and Accrued Taxes Payable		—		48,187		—		(48,187	)	A		—		—				—
Settlement Payable		84,717		423,358		—		—				508,075		—				508,075
Member Collateral		—		304,836		—		49,361		A		354,197		—				354,197
Accrued Compensation		145,638		—		2,155		124,661		A		272,454		19,860		I		292,314
Accrued Compensation and Benefits		—		140,822		—		(140,822	)	A		—		—				—
Volume and Support Agreements		185,490		—		—		104,489		A		289,979		—				289,979
Current Portion of Member Deposits		70,355		—		—		—				70,355		—				70,355
Accrued Liabilities		448,401		263,495		3,716		(101,665	)	A		589,983		(1,544	)	L		707,507
								(25,663	)	B				119,068		T
								1,699		C
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt		25,914		—		20		25,986		C		51,920		—				51,920
Current Portion of Accrued Litigation Obligation		237,956		—		—		114		A		238,070		—				238,070
Total Current Liabilities		1,262,628		1,180,698		9,911		2,255				2,455,492		137,384				2,592,876

See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.

111

VISA INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET

AS OF MARCH 31, 2007

(in thousands)

	Historical
						Note 2												Unaudited Pro Forma Visa Inc.
	Visa U.S.A.			Visa International		Visa Canada			Combination Adjustments				Combined Subtotal	Pro Forma Adjustments
Other Liabilities		139,175			51,404		2,841			33		A	175,074		25,213		I		630,826
										(20,013	)	B			13,539		T
										1,634		C			417,000		V
Long-Term Debt		31,536			39,941		—			18,991		C	90,468		—				90,468
Obligations Under Capital Lease							29			(29	)	A	—		—				—
Accrued Litigation Obligation		811,413			—		—			—			811,413		—				811,413
Non-Current Portion of Deferred Tax Liabilities		—			—		—			—			—		3,408,173		M		3,409,875
															1,702		L
Total Liabilities		2,244,752			1,272,043		12,781			2,871			3,532,447		4,003,011				7,535,458
Minority Interest		39,266			—		—			(26,600	)	B	12,666		(12,666	)	N		—
Equity
Capital and Partnership		—			—		—			(38,533	)	B	—		—				—
										38,533		C
Common Stock		—			—		—			(500	)	B	—		15,484,314		K		15,484,314
										500		C
Current Net Income		—			—		—			(2,466	)	B	—		—				—
										2,466		C
Accumulated Net Income		968,903			750,595		27,888			7,005		C	1,534,295		(566,710	)	J		964,649
										(217,793	)	B			(2,936	)	L
										(3,860	)	D
										1,557		D
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss		(445	)		54		(1,000	)		3,860		D	912		(39	)	J		873
										(1,557	)	D
Total Equity		968,458			750,649		26,888			(210,788	)		1,535,207		14,914,629				16,449,836
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	3,252,476		$	2,022,692	$	39,669		$	(234,517	)		$5,080,320	$	18,904,974			$	23,985,294

See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.

112

VISA INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	Historical
						Note 2
	Visa U.S.A.			Visa International		Visa Canada		Combination Adjustments				Combined Subtotal			Pro Forma Adjustments				Unaudited Pro Forma Visa Inc.
Operating Revenues
Card Service Fees	$	811,382		$	360,513	$	39,746	$	88,765		A	$	1,205,924		$	(43,497	)	P	$	1,162,427
									(94,482	)	B									—
Data Processing Fees		651,942			138,152		13,201		925		A		761,559			(16,521	)	Q		745,038
									(42,661	)	B									—
Volume and Support Agreements		(233,806	)		—		—		(89,860	)	A		(323,666	)						(323,666	)
International Transaction Fees		210,989			—		222		269,807		A		481,018			(21,304	)	R		459,714
International Service Revenues		—			269,807		—		(269,807	)	A					—				—
Other Revenues		217,667			90,785		5,282		170		A		249,336			71,250		S		320,586
									(89,516	)	B									—
									24,948		C									—
Total Operating Revenues		1,658,174			859,257		58,451		(201,711	)			2,374,171			(10,072	)			2,364,099
Operating Expenses
Personnel		344,749			184,883		6,944		5,385		C		541,961			—				541,961
Affiliates Services		—			96,053		9,581		(96,053	)	A		—							—
									(9,581	)	B									—
Facilities		45,270			—		1,367		24,044		A		47,959			1,863		E		49,822
									(32,038	)	B									—
									9,316		C									—
Premises, Equipment and Software		—			53,143		—		(53,143	)	A		—			—				—
Communication		—			17,579		—		(17,579	)	A		—			—				—
Network, EDP and Communications		160,957			—		752		46,679		A		207,966			26,574		E		233,431
									(1,401	)	B					(1,109	)	E
									979		C									—
Advertising, Marketing and Promotion		249,866			152,193		16,040		9,941		A		428,054			—				428,054
									14		C					—				—
Travel and Meetings		—			24,665		—		(24,665	)	A		—			—				—
Visa International Fees		86,467			—		7,905		(94,372	)	B		—			—				—
Professional and Consulting Fees		150,308			81,802		2,526		(819	)	B		236,782			(15,791	)	O		220,991
									2,965		C									—
Administration and Other Expenses		25,557			27,148		1,505		107,165		A		67,851			—				67,851
									(95,580	)	B									—
									2,056		C									—
Litigation Obligation Provision		14,800			—		—		195		A		14,995			—				14,995
Total Operating Expenses		1,077,974			637,466		46,620		(216,492	)			1,545,568			11,537				1,557,105
Operating Income		580,200			221,791		11,831		14,781				828,603			(21,609	)			806,994
Non-Operating Income, net		—			32,414		—		(32,414	)	A		—							—
Other Income (Expenses)
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates		25,107			—		191		1,838		A		(8	)		—				(8	)
									(27,144	)	B
Interest Income (Expense)		(39,798	)		—		387		(545	)	A		(44,749	)		—				(44,749	)
									(1,922	)	C									—
									(2,871	)	D
Investment Income, net		45,838			—		—		27,705		A		66,584			—				66,584
									(7,132	)	B
									173		C
Total Other Income (Expense)		31,147			—		578		(9,898	)			21,827			—				21,827
Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest		611,347			254,205		12,409		(27,531	)			850,430			(21,609	)			828,821
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (See Note 5)		225,032			109,025		67		18		C		334,142			(20,631	)	M		302,911
																(10,600	)	L
Income (Loss) Before Minority Interest		386,315			145,180		12,342		(27,549	)			516,288			9,622				525,910
Minority Interest Income (Expense)		(1,184	)		—		—		802		B		(382	)		382		N		—
Net Income	$	385,131		$	145,180	$	12,342		(26,747	)			515,906		$	10,004			$	525,910
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share (See Note 3)																			$	0.68
Number of Shares Outstanding, basic and diluted																				775,080,512		U

See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.

113

VISA INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	Historical
							Note 2
	Visa U.S.A.			Visa International			Visa Canada			Combination Adjustments			Combined Subtotal			Pro Forma Adjustments			Unaudited Pro Forma Visa, Inc.
Operating Revenues
Card Service Fees	$	1,482,439		$	455,301		$	71,388		$	300,139	A	$	2,135,778		$	(84,566	)P	$	2,051,212
											(173,489	)B
Data Processing Fees		1,247,969			245,319			23,454			1,210	A		1,438,762			(28,913	)Q		1,409,849
											(79,190	)B
Volume and Support Agreements		(587,751	)		—			—			(302,359	)A		(890,110	)		—			(890,110	)
International Transaction Fees		397,954			—			465			428,027	A		826,446			(35,670	)R		790,776
International Service Revenues		—			427,232			—			(427,232	)A		—			—			—
Other Revenues		407,515			134,703			9,842			215	A		394,559			142,500	S		537,059
											(204,440	)B
											46,724	C
Total Operating Revenues		2,948,126			1,262,555			105,149			(410,395	)		3,905,435			(6,649	)		3,898,786
Operating Expenses
Personnel		671,093			317,003			12,339			9,710	C		1,010,145			(1,086	)I		1,009,059
Affiliates Services		—			212,144			19,027			(212,144	)A		—			—			—
											(19,027	)B
Premises, Equipment and Software		—			105,245			—			(105,245	)A		—			—			—
Facilities		89,298			—			2,398			50,111	A		100,907			4,519	E		105,426
											(61,384	)B
											20,484	C
Communications		—			33,423			—			(33,423	)A		—			—			—
Network, EDP and Communications		327,593			—			1,412			88,557	A		417,043			58,101	E		473,995
											(2,645	)B					(1,149	)E
											2,126	C
Advertising, Marketing and Promotion		539,258			343,922			45,239			10,634	A		939,084			—			939,084
											31	C
Travel and Meetings		—			59,275			—			(59,275	)A		—			—			—
Visa International Fees		159,264			—			14,303			(173,567	)B		—			—			—
Professional and Consulting Fees		291,235			119,004			6,003			(4,654	)B		417,554			(6,361	)O		411,193
											5,966	C
Administrative and Other Expenses		117,837			52,243			4,633			258,923	A		227,288			—			227,288
											(210,848	)B
											4,500	C
Settlement Risk Guarantee		—			(150	)		—			150	A		—			—			—
Litigation Obligation Provision		22,878			—			—			—			22,878			—			22,878
Total Operating Expenses		2,218,456			1,242,109			105,354			(431,020	)		3,134,899			54,024			3,188,923
Operating Income		729,670			20,446			(205	)		20,625			770,536			(60,673	)		709,863
Non-Operating Income, net		—			78,511			—			(78,511	)A		—			—			—
Other Income (Expenses)
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates		13,355			—			2,382			9,203	A		1,155			—			1,155
											(23,785	)B
Interest Expense		(89,539	)		—			562			(10,152	)A		(104,185	)		—			(104,185	)
											(4,067	)C
											(989	)D
Investment Income, net		68,330			—			—			62,742	A		131,450			—			131,450
											378	C
Other Income (Expense), net		—			—			—			15,006	A		—			—			—
											(15,006	)B
Total Other Income (Expense)		(7,854	)		—			2,944			33,330			28,420			—			28,420
Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest		721,816			98,957			2,739			(24,556	)		798,956			(60,674	)		738,283
Income Tax Expenses (Benefit) (See Note 5)		251,338			29,202			853			14	C		281,407			(22,001	)M		273,195
																	13,789	L
Income (Loss) before Minority Interest		470,478			69,755			1,886			(24,570	)		517,549			(52,461	)		465,088
Minority Interest Income (Expense)		(15,917	)		—			—			10,782	B		(5,135	)		5,135	N		—
Net Income	$	454,561		$	69,755		$	1,886		$	(13,788	)	$	512,414		$	(47,326	)	$	465,088
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share (See Note 3)																			$	0.60
Number of Shares Outstanding, basic and diluted																				775,080,512	U

See notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.

114

Notes to Visa Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma

Condensed Combined Financial Information

(in thousands, except as noted)

1. Basis of Presentation

Background and Historical Cross-Ownership

Presently, the global Visa enterprise includes four major separate incorporated entities: Visa U.S.A., Visa International, Visa Canada and Visa Europe. At March 31, 2007, Visa U.S.A. held a 69% ownership interest in its consolidated subsidiary, Inovant, and an estimated 28% membership interest in Visa International. The remaining 31% ownership interest in Inovant is held by Visa International (including a portion held by the members of the unincorporated regions), Visa Canada and Visa Europe. The remaining estimated 72% membership interest in Visa International is held by Visa Europe, Visa Canada and the members of the unincorporated regions. The estimated membership interests held are based on the member’s dividend and dissolution rights under the bylaws of Visa International. The rights are based upon the cumulative volume-based service fees paid by members to Visa International since inception, as a percentage of total volume-based service fees received. Therefore, the percentage of ownership fluctuates over time.

Restructuring Transactions

Visa Inc. will participate in the restructuring, which includes a series of integrated transactions involving Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada, with members of each entity exchanging their membership interests in these entities for shares of common stock of Visa Inc. Visa Europe will remain owned and governed by its European member banks but will exchange its membership interest in Visa International and its ownership interest in Inovant for a minority shareholding in Visa Inc. and other consideration. Additionally, Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will enter into a framework agreement, which provides for trademark and technology licenses and bilateral services. Under these agreements, Visa Inc. will grant to Visa Europe exclusive, irrevocable and perpetual licenses to use, within the Visa Europe region, the Visa trademarks and technology intellectual property owned by Visa Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries in exchange for an annual fee. Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will provide each other with transitional and ongoing services similar to those services currently provided among Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada, Inovant and Visa Europe. Additionally, Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will enter into a put-call option agreement (see Note 3 “Visa Europe Transaction” to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information for more information).

Purchase Accounting

The restructuring will be accounted for as a purchase under the guidelines of SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations” with Visa U.S.A. deemed to be the accounting acquirer of Visa International and Visa Canada. As a result of the exchange of ownership interests, Visa U.S.A. will acquire the remaining ownership interest in Visa International and Inovant not currently held. This transaction will be accounted for as a step acquisition with the net assets underlying the interests acquired being recorded at fair value. Visa U.S.A. will further acquire 100% of Visa Canada and record the acquisition of the underlying net assets at fair value.

Purchase Consideration

Participating Regions

The initial allocation of Visa Inc. common stock to the financial institution members of the unincorporated regions of Visa International and the shareholders of Visa Canada, which we collectively refer to as the participating regions, was based on each participating region’s projected net income contribution to the overall projected combined Visa enterprise in fiscal 2008, after giving effect to negotiated adjustments. The value of the purchase consideration conveyed to the Visa Canada and Visa International regional members was determined by valuing the businesses contributed after giving effect to negotiated adjustments agreed to by each party. As Visa Inc. is a newly created entity with no quoted market price and did not previously exist as a combined entity, we

115

determined that purchase consideration would be more reliably measured by valuing the contributed businesses as opposed to valuing the Visa Inc. stock exchanged. We utilized three standard valuation methodologies including an analysis of comparable public companies, a two-year forward earnings multiple analysis and a precedent transaction analysis to calculate the value of the contributed businesses.

Visa Europe

Visa Europe will remain owned and governed by its European member banks. The value of the purchase consideration provided to Visa Europe in exchange for its membership interest in Visa International was derived, for financial accounting reporting purposes, by valuing each of the individual elements comprising the overall Visa Europe transaction to arrive at the residual value exchanged.

The elements that Visa Europe will receive will include:

• an approximate 11.7% ownership interest in Visa Inc. in the form of 62,213,201 shares of class EU (series I) common stock and 549,587 shares of class EU (series III) common stock collectively representing approximately 8.1% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock, and 27,904,464 shares of class EU (series II) common stock representing approximately 3.6% of Visa Inc.’s outstanding capital stock;

• a put option to require Visa Inc. to purchase from the Visa Europe members all of the issued shares in the capital of Visa Europe;

• irrevocable and perpetual trademark and technology licenses to use the Visa trademarks and technology-related intellectual property owned by Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Inovant, which we refer to collectively as the licensors, within the Visa Europe region; and

• the right to receive transitional and ongoing services similar to those services currently provided among Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada, Inovant and Visa Europe.

The elements that Visa Inc. will receive will include:

• Visa Europe’s membership interest in Visa International;

• Visa Europe’s 10% interest in Inovant; and

• a contingent call option to require Visa Europe to cause the Visa Europe members to convey and deliver to Visa Inc. all of the issued shares in the capital of Visa Europe.

Visa Inc. and Visa Europe have mutually agreed to enter into a framework agreement, which provides for the above described trademark and technology licenses and bilateral services. See Note 3 “Visa Europe Transaction” to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information for a full description of all the elements of the transaction with Visa Europe including a discussion of the determination of fair value of each element.

Measurement Date

For the purpose of this unaudited pro forma financial information, we have preliminarily estimated the value of total purchase consideration at June 15, 2007, which we refer to as the measurement date and which is the date at which all parties entered into the restructuring agreement.

Using the above described methods, we determined the total purchase consideration to be approximately $16.0 billion as follows:

Visa Inc. stock	$	15,484,314
Visa Europe Put Option		417,000
Obligation under Framework Agreement		132,600
Total Purchase Consideration	$	16,033,914

116

See Note 3 “Visa Europe Transaction” for further information regarding the Visa Europe’s put option and the obligation under the framework agreement.

Purchase Consideration Allocation

The following table sets forth the preliminary allocation of the estimated purchase consideration to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and goodwill assuming that the restructuring occurred on March 31, 2007. The fair values and remaining useful lives of these net assets have been estimated based on our preliminary appraisal. The actual adjustments to our consolidated financial statements upon the closing of the restructuring will be based on the net assets acquired at that date and will depend on a number of factors, including completion of an appraisal of the net assets acquired upon consummation. Therefore, the actual adjustments will differ from the pro forma adjustments presented.

The allocation of total purchase consideration to net tangible and intangible assets acquired and to goodwill is as follows:

	(in millions)
Net tangible assets and liabilities:
Current assets	$	1,328
Non-current assets		429
Facilities, equipment, and software, net		260
Current liabilities		(887	)
Non-current liabilities		(3,749	)
Pension and post-retirement benefits		(89	)
Long-term debt		(36	)
Identifiable intangible assets:
Trademark		2,451
Customer Relationships		5,375
European Franchise Right		1,415
Technology		198
Goodwill		9,339
Total preliminary estimated purchase price	$	16,034

2. Visa Canada Consolidated Financial Statements

Historically Visa Canada has reported its financial position and results of operations under the not-for-profit guidelines of Canadian GAAP. For the purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information we have applied pro forma adjustments to the balance sheet of Visa Canada at March 31, 2007, and its statements of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 as reconciled to U.S. GAAP. The period end currency exchange rate at March 31, 2007 between Canadian dollars (or CAD) and U.S. dollars (or USD) was used to translate Visa Canada financial information in the pro forma information. This exchange rate was 1.1530 CAD per U.S. dollar. See Note 11 “Reconciliation of Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles” to the March 31, 2007 consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada and Note 12 “Reconciliation of Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles” to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 audited historical consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada for a reconciliation of Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP applicable to the financial position and results of operations of Visa Canada.

117

The unaudited reconciliation between Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP for Visa Canada’s historical statements of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the audited reconciliation for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 are provided below.

			Note 6-A
Six months ended March 31, 2007	Canadian GAAP		Reclassification Adjustments			U.S. GAAP Reconciling Adjustments			U.S. GAAP		U.S. GAAP
(unaudited)	(in CAD)		(in CAD)			(in CAD)			(in CAD)		(in USD)
Revenue from members	$	63,011		(63,011	)	$	—		$	—	$	—
Operating Revenues
Multicurrency Conversion Fees		260		(260	)		—			—		—
Card Recovery Bulletin Fees		4,013		(4,013	)		—			—		—
Interest Income		446		(446	)		—			—		—
Distribution from Inovant LLC		—		—			—			—		—
Other		110		(110	)		—			—		—
Card Service Fees		—		45,827			—			45,827		39,746
International Transaction Fees		—		256			—			256		222
Data Processing Fees		—		15,221			—			15,221		13,201
Other Revenues		—		6,090			—			6,090		5,282
Total Operating Revenues		67,840		(446	)		—			67,394		58,451
Operating expenses
Personnel		—		8,025			(18	) (1)		8,007		6,944
Facilities		—		1,576			—			1,576		1,367
Network, EDP and Communications		—		867			—			867		752
Advertising and Marketing		18,494		—			—			18,494		16,040
Direct Expenses		20,161		(20,161	)		—			—		—
Other Operating		15,038		(15,038	)		—			—		—
Affiliate Services		—		11,047			—			11,047		9,581
Visa International Fees		—		9,114			—			9,114		7,905
Professional and consulting Services		—		2,913			—			2,913		2,526
Administrative and Other		—		1,657			78	(2)		1,735		1,505
Total Operating Expenses		53,693		—			60			53,753		46,620
Operating Income		14,147		(446	)		(60	)		13,641		11,831
Other Income
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates		—		—			220	(2)		220		191
Interest Income		—		446			—			446		387
Total Other Income		—		446			220			666		578
Excess of Income over Expense
Income before Income Taxes		14,147		—			160			14,307		12,409
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)		201		—			(124	) (2)		77		67
Net Income	$	13,946	$	—		$	284		$	14,230	$	12,342

118

				Note 6-A
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2006	Canadian GAAP			Reclassification Adjustments			U.S. GAAP Reconciling Adjustments			U.S. GAAP			U.S. GAAP
	(in CAD)			(in CAD)			(in CAD)			(in CAD)			(in USD)
Revenue from Members	$	113,618		$	(113,618	)	$	—		$	—		$	—
Other revenue
Card Recovery Bulletin Fees		6,963			(6,963	)		—			—			—
Interest Income		648			(648	)		—			—			—
Distribution from Inovant LLC		—			—			—			—			—
Other		737			(737	)		—			—			—
Card Service Fees		—			82,310			—			82,310			71,388
International Transaction Fees		—			536			—			536			465
Data Processing Fees		—			27,042			—			27,042			23,454
Other Revenues		—			11,348			—			11,348			9,842
Total Operating Revenues		121,966			(730	)		—			121,236			105,149
Operating expenses
Personnel		—			14,263			(36	) (1)		14,227			12,339
Facilities		—			2,765			—			2,765			2,398
Network, EDP and Communications		—			1,628			—			1,628			1,412
Advertising and Marketing		52,161			—			—			52,161			45,239
Direct Expenses		39,168			(39,168	)		—			—			—
Other Operating		30,304			(30,304	)		—			—			—
Affiliate Services		—			21,938			—			21,938			19,027
Visa International Fees		—			16,491			—			16,491			14,303
Professional and Consulting Services		—			6,921			—			6,921			6,003
Administrative and Other		—			5,466			(57	) (3)		5,342			4,633
								(67	) (2)		—			—
Total Operating Expenses		121,633			—			(160	)		121,473			105,354
Operating Income		333			(730	)		160			(237	)		(205	)
Other Income
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates		—			—			2,747	(2)		2,747			2,382
Interest Income		—			648			—			648			562
Total Other Income		—			648			2,747			3,395			2,944
Income before Income Taxes		333			(82	)		2,907			3,158			2,739
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)		1,756			(82	)		(691	) (2)		983			853
Net Income	$	(1,423	)	$	—		$	3,598		$	2,175		$	1,886

⁽¹⁾ Future employee benefit - the reconciling item represents the adjustment to record an additional minimum liability attributable to the excess of any unfunded accumulated benefit obligation associated with employee future benefits to conform to U.S. GAAP. Additionally, there is a difference between Canadian and U.S. GAAP relating to the amortization of the transitional amounts resulting from differing adoption dates of the standards in Canada and the U.S. The net transitional asset (obligation) and related amortization are reversed for U.S. GAAP purposes.

⁽²⁾ Investment in Inovant - the reconciling item represents the adjustments to account for Visa Canada’s investment in Inovant using the equity method under U.S. GAAP.

⁽³⁾ Investment in available-for-sale securities - the reconciling item represents the adjustments to reverse a temporary investment write-down recorded under Canadian GAAP, but not required under U.S. GAAP.

119

3. Visa Europe Transaction

As part of the restructuring, Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will enter into a multi-element arrangement. Under this agreement, for financial accounting reporting purposes, in exchange for its membership interest in Visa International and its ownership interest in Inovant, Visa Europe will receive the following consideration:

Class EU (Series I) and (Series III) Common Stock and Class C (Series I), (Series III) and (Series IV) Common Stock

At the date of restructuring, Visa Europe will receive an approximate 8.1% ownership interest in Visa Inc. in the form of class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock. The class EU (series I) and (series III) common stock will be classified as permanent equity by Visa Inc. after the date of the restructuring and will convert on a one-to-one basis into shares of class C (series III) and class C (series IV) common stock at the date of the true-up (see “The Global Restructuring Agreement—True-Up of Merger Consideration” included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus for further information).

In addition to the other class C series except class C (series II) common stock, the class C (series III) and class C (series IV) common stock are subject to redemption in the manner provided by our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Redemption is contingent upon the successful completion of an initial public offering of our class A common stock. We intend to use a portion, as determined by our board of directors, of the proceeds from our initial public offering to fund this redemption.

We have determined the fair value of Visa Europe’s 8.1% ownership interest in Visa Inc. to be approximately $2.9 billion at the date of restructuring based on the value of the purchase consideration provided to the participating regions in exchange for their historical membership interests in Visa International and Visa Canada.

Class EU (Series II) Common Stock and Class C (Series II) Common Stock

At the date of restructuring, Visa Europe will receive an approximate 3.6% ownership interest in Visa Inc. common stock in the form of class EU (series II) common stock. The class EU (series II) common stock will be classified in permanent equity, as it provides equity rights similar to that of the other regional classes of shares and will convert on a one-to-one basis into shares of class C (series II) common stock at the date of the true-up (see “The Global Restructuring Agreement - True-Up of Merger Consideration” included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus for further information).

The class C (series II) common stock is subject to redemption by Visa Inc. We are entitled to redeem all, but not less than all, of these shares held by Visa Europe any time after the later of the date of admission to trading of our class A common stock on an internationally recognized securities exchange, which we refer to as the initial public offering date, or 369 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger. In addition, Visa Europe is entitled to require us to redeem all, but not less than all, of these shares at any time after the later of 60 days after to the initial public offering date or 429 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger. Upon the occurrence of the initial public offering date, for financial accounting purposes, we intend to classify this stock at its then fair value as temporary or mezzanine level equity in our consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, over the period from the initial public offering date to the date the stock is first redeemable at the option of Visa Europe, which we refer to as the accretion period, we will accrete this stock to its redemption price through our retained earnings. We will further report earnings per share on the two-class method to reflect the impact of this accretion on the net income available to common stockholders (see below for further information). The redemption price of the class C (series II) common stock is equal to $1.146 billion adjusted for dividends and certain other adjustments (see “Description of Capital Stock of Visa, Inc.—Redemption” included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus for further information regarding the class C (series II) common stock, including a complete description of the calculation of the redemption price).

We have determined the initial fair value of the class C (series II) common stock to be approximately $1.104 billion at the date of restructuring. We determined fair value by discounting the redemption price using a

120

risk-free rate based on the probability and timing of the successful completion of an initial public offering of our class A common stock, this event would cause the class C (series II) common stock to become redeemable at the estimated redemption price.

For the purposes of presenting earnings per share in the unaudited pro forma statement of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, we have assumed that we will not file an initial registration statement on Form S-1 in connection with our initial public offering of our common stock during the period covered by the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations. We have therefore reported earnings per share as a single class. However, it is our intention to file such registration statement on Form S-1 as soon as it is feasible after the restructuring. As described above, if we are successful in executing an initial public offering of our common stock, we will reclassify the class C (series II) common stock as temporary or mezzanine level equity in our consolidated balance sheet and accrete this stock to its redemption price through retained earnings. We estimate that the total amount of accretion will be approximately $42.0 million, which represents the difference between its initial fair value and its redemption price assuming no applicable adjustments. The total amount of accretion will reduce the amount of net income available to common stockholders for the purpose of calculated basic and diluted earnings per share during the accretion period.

The Put-Call Option Agreement

Under the put-call option agreement between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe, we are entitled to purchase all of the share capital of Visa Europe from its members at anytime following certain triggering dates, but in any event not before the closing of our initial public offering. A triggering event will occur if: (A) there is a 25% or greater decline in the number of merchants and a 45% or greater decline in the number of automated teller machines in Visa Europe’s region that accept Visa-branded products; (B) such rate of decline in each case is at least twice as much as both: (i) the average rate of decline in the number of merchants and ATMs in the Visa Europe region that accept general payment cards and (ii) the average rate of decline in acceptance, if any, in the number of merchants and ATMs outside of Visa Europe’s region that accept Visa-branded cards; and (C) Visa Europe has failed to deliver and implement a remediation plan within six months of the occurrence of such events. Further, Visa Europe is entitled to require us to purchase from the members of Visa Europe all of its share capital any time after the earlier of 365 days following the initial public offering date or 605 days after the closing date of the restructuring. The price per share at which both the call and put option are exercisable is calculated using a formula principally based on Visa Europe’s projected financial performance, identified synergies expected to be realized upon combination of the entities and our forward P/E ratio (see “Material Contracts—The Put-Call Option Agreement” included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus for further information).

We have determined that the call option contained in the put-call option agreement has nominal value at the date of the restructuring, since the conditions under which the call is exercisable are deemed remote. We have determined that at the date of the restructuring the fair value of the put option is approximately $417 million, which has been recorded as a long-term liability in our unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet. Subsequent to the restructuring, this liability will be carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in our statement of operations similar to the treatment required by of SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and reclassified as a short-term liability when it becomes exercisable within one year.

We determined the fair value of the put option using probability-weighted models designed to estimate our future liability under various future exercise scenarios. These models were designed to approximate the current value of our liability assuming Visa Europe exercised their put option at various times and under various economic conditions in the future. The key assumptions used in these models were dictated by the various elements of the put option strike price calculation and the fair value of Visa Europe. This included Visa Europe’s projected financial performance, which we estimated using a wide range of growth scenarios, identified synergies, which we estimated will approximate those a market participant would expect to realize upon combination and our anticipated price-to-earnings ratio on the date of exercise, which we assumed based on comparable public companies and other analyses.

121

The Framework Agreement

The relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will be governed after the restructuring by a framework agreement, which provides for bilateral services and trademark and technology licenses.

The Bilateral Services

Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will provide each other with transitional and ongoing services similar to those services currently provided among Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada, Inovant and Visa Europe. Visa Inc. will provide Visa Europe with authorization services for cross-border transactions involving Visa Europe’s region, on the one hand, and the rest of the world, on the other hand, as well as clearing and settlement services both within Visa Europe’s region until Visa Europe’s regional clearing and settlement system is deployed (at which time this service will cease) and between Visa Europe’s region and the rest of the world. In addition, until Visa Europe’s regional clearing and settlement system is deployed, the parties will share foreign exchange revenues related to currency conversion for transactions involving European cardholders as well as other cross-border transactions that take place in Visa Europe’s region. The parties will also use each others’ switching and processing services.

Visa Europe will indemnify Visa Inc. for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought by Visa Europe’s member banks against Visa Inc., while Visa Inc. will indemnify Visa Europe for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought against Visa Europe by Visa Inc.’s customer banks.

We have determined that no material value was exchanged in the bilateral services agreement above or below fair value as a result of agreeing to receive or perform services at specified rates. We made this determination by comparing the pricing specified in the agreement to those routinely charged by comparable third party service providers. As a result, we have not recorded an asset or liability to reflect an obligation to provide or receive services at above or below fair value.

The Trademark and Technology Licenses

The licensors will grant to Visa Europe exclusive, irrevocable and perpetual licenses to use the Visa trademarks and technology-related intellectual property owned by the licensors and certain affiliates within the Visa Europe region for use in the field of financial services, payments, related information technology and information processing services and participation in the Visa system, which we refer to as the field. Visa Europe’s region consists of the European Union and Andorra, Bear Island, the Channel Islands, the Faeroe Islands, Gibraltar, Greenland, Iceland, the Isle of Man, Israel, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Norway, San Marino, Switzerland, Turkey, and Vatican City, and any other jurisdiction that becomes a full member state of the European Union in the future. Visa Europe may sublicense the Visa trademarks and technology intellectual property to its members and other sublicensees, such as processors, for use within Visa Europe’s region and in certain limited circumstances, outside the Visa Europe region.

From the restructuring closing date until the earlier of (i) one year from the restructuring closing date, and (ii) the filing of a registration statement on Form S-1 in connection with an initial public offering of Visa Inc. common stock, the fee payable for the licenses will be $6.0 million per quarter. Thereafter until the later of (i) the initial public offering date and (ii) 369 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, the fee payable for the licenses will be $142.5 million per year, payable quarterly ($35.6 million per quarter), which we refer to as the quarterly base fee, reduced by an amount equal to $1.146 billion multiplied by the three month LIBOR rate plus 100 to 200 basis points, which we refer to as the first fee reduction component in this “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information.” Based on the applicable three-month LIBOR rate at March 31, 2007 of 5.35%, the first fee reduction component in the initial quarter following the initial public offering date would total approximately $18.2 million. The first fee reduction component will cease upon the later of 369 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger or the initial public offering date. Should the initial public offering date occur prior to the date which falls 369 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, for the period between these two dates, the quarterly base fee will further be reduced by an amount equal to the product of the following: (i) the net price per share of our class A common stock on the initial public offering date; (ii) the number of shares of Visa Inc. held

122

by Visa Europe (other than class EU (series II) or class C (series II) shares) that would have been redeemed immediately, but for provisions that delay the redemption of shares held by Visa Europe until one year following the date of the initial public offering; and (iii) the three month LIBOR rate plus 100 to 200 basis points, which we refer to as the second fee reduction component in this “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information.” Beginning three years after Visa Europe begins to pay the quarterly base fee (subject to the first and second fee reduction components), this fee will be increased annually based on the growth of the gross domestic product of the European Union.

We determined through an analysis of the fee rates implied by the economics of the agreement and consultation with third party valuation experts, that the quarterly base fee as adjusted in future periods based on the growth of the gross domestic product of the European Union approximates fair value. As a result of the first and second fee reduction components, the trademark and technology license agreement represents a contract for financial accounting purposes that is below fair value. Therefore, we have recorded a liability of approximately $132.6 million to reflect our obligation to provide this license at below fair value.

This liability of $132.6 million was calculated assuming that we will file an initial registration statement on Form S-1 with respect to an initial public offering of our common stock and that the initial public offering date will occur three months and six months, respectively, subsequent to the restructuring. Therefore, in the initial quarter subsequent to the restructuring, Visa Europe will pay us a fee of $6.0 million, which is approximately $29.6 million below the fair value of approximately $35.6 million. Assuming the filing of a registration statement on Form S-1 in respect of an initial public offering of our common stock in the second quarter following the restructuring, the quarterly fee amount Visa Europe will pay us will increase to $35.6 million reduced by the first fee reduction component. Upon the assumed initial public offering date approximately six months following the restructuring, the fee amount will further be reduced by the second fee reduction component. We have estimated that the total first and second fee reduction components applicable in the year following the restructuring will be approximately $56.7 million and $46.3 million, respectively. In estimating the second fee reduction component we have assumed that the product of: (i) the net price per share of our class A common stock on the initial public offering date; (ii) the number of shares of Visa Inc. held by Visa Europe (other than class EU (series II) or class C (series II) shares) that would have been redeemed immediately, but for provisions that delay the redemption of shares held by Visa Europe until one year following the date of the initial public offering; and (iii) a three month LIBOR rate of 5.35% plus 100 to 200 basis points will be approximately $96.1 million. These assumptions represent our best estimate of the future impact of these terms of the framework agreement.

The application of the three month LIBOR rate plus 100 to 200 basis points in determining the first and second fee reduction components represents a variable interest element embedded within the framework agreement, which we will treat as an embedded derivative with changes in fair value reflected in our statement of operations under the guidelines of SFAS No. 133. This embedded derivative does not impact the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.

4. Investor’s Equity Rollforward

The following table provides a reconciliation of historical Visa U.S.A. total member equity and Visa Inc. total pro forma equity as of March 31, 2007 to reflect the application of combination and purchase accounting adjustments.

	As of March 31, 2007
Historical Visa U.S.A. Total Equity	$	968,458
Pro Forma Adjustments:
Visa Inc. equity issued as part of total purchase consideration		15,484,314
Tax adjustments (1)		(2,936	)
Pro Forma Investor’s Equity	$	16,449,836

⁽¹⁾ Adjustment to the historical deferred tax assets recorded to reflect the change in the anticipated future applicable tax rate due to the aggregation of state returns.

123

5. California Cooperative Status

The state of California, where both Visa International and Visa U.S.A. are headquartered, has historically not taxed a substantial portion of the reported net income of these companies on the basis that both operate on a cooperative or mutual basis and are therefore eligible for a special deduction pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code §24405, which we refer to as the special deduction. As taxpayers eligible for the special deduction, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International were generally only subject to California taxation on non-member/owner income. Therefore, the majority of each company’s income was not historically taxable.

Subsequent to the restructuring, we believe that Visa Inc. will continue to be eligible to claim the special deduction afforded and will continue to be largely exempt from California taxation. Accordingly, no pro forma adjustment has been applied to this unaudited condensed combined pro forma financial information to reflect the potential increase in our California state income tax rate, its impact on our deferred tax assets and liabilities or tax expenses and benefits, as a result of losing the benefit of the special deduction.

On or after completion of an initial public offering or other material changes to our operations, we believe that there is the potential that Visa Inc. may lose eligibility for the special deduction. It is our intention to file a registration statement on Form S-1 pursuant to the initial public offering of our class A common stock as soon as it is feasible after the restructuring. If we were to lose eligibility for the special deduction, our state tax effective rate would increase by approximately 3%, net of federal tax benefit. Had ineligibility for the special deduction been reflected as of October 1, 2005 in the unaudited condensed combined pro forma statements of operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, our income tax expense would have been increased and net income would have been decreased by approximately $23.6 million. A corresponding effective tax rate increase reported in the unaudited condensed combined pro forma statement of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2007 would have resulted in an increase in income tax expense and decrease in net income of approximately $26.2 million. The loss of the special deduction would not have resulted in a material impact on total equity reported in our unaudited condensed combined pro forma balance sheet as of March 31, 2007.

6. Combination and Pro Forma Adjustments

The following describes the combination and pro forma adjustments we applied to the unaudited balance sheets of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada at March 31, 2007, derived from their historical financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus, to reflect the restructuring as if it had occurred on March 31, 2007 and the pro forma adjustments we applied to the statements of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada, derived from their historical financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus, to reflect the restructuring as if it had it occurred on October 1, 2005.

Combination Adjustments

A - Represents reclassifications made to the historical financial statement presentation of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada to conform the financial statement presentation. These adjustments have no impact on the Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada member equity or net income as reported in their historical financial statements.

B - Represents the adjustments required to eliminate the effects of transactions and cross-ownership among and between Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada.

C - Represents the adjustments necessary to record the gross asset, liability, revenue and expense balances related to the real estate joint ventures at March 31, 2007 and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International previously each owned 50% of these real estate joint ventures and accounted for their investments under the equity method (see Note 8 “Investments in Joint Ventures” of the Visa U.S.A. audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2006 for more information regarding the real estate joint ventures).

124

D - Represents reclassifications made to conform Visa International’s presentation of investment securities related to deferred compensation arrangements to Visa U.S.A.’s presentation of these securities. This reclassification resulted in trading assets being reclassified to investment securities, available-for-sale with a corresponding change in classification of unrealized gains and losses on these securities from other non-operating income to accumulated other comprehensive income (expense).

Purchase Accounting Pro Forma Adjustments

E - Represents the increase in value resulting from the preliminary allocation of purchase price to facilities, equipment, and software based on our preliminary independent appraisal.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the historical basis of Visa U.S.A. facilities, equipment, and software to Visa Inc.’s new basis upon the application of purchase accounting:

	Facilities, equipment, and software, net
Visa U.S.A. historical basis	$	268,472
Less:  Minority interest		(18,999	)
Net U.S.A. historical basis		249,473
Visa U.S.A. historical basis in Visa International		45,895
Visa U.S.A. historical basis in real estate joint ventures (see tickmark C)		53,345
Acquired assets (See Note 1)		260,000
Reclassification adjustments(1)		(37,069	)
Total Visa Inc. basis	$	571,644

⁽¹⁾ This adjustment reflects the reclassification of certain Visa U.S.A. technology from facilities, equipment and software to technology.

The adjustment to the statements of operations represents the following pro forma adjustments to record additional non-cash amortization and depreciation expense related to the new basis of intangible and tangible definite lived assets, which have been recorded on a pro forma basis at their estimated fair value.

	Visa U.S.A. Historical Expense for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2007		Visa Int’l, Visa Canada, Real Estate Joint Ventures Historical Expense for the Six Months ended March 31, 2007		Pro Forma Adjustment		Total Expense for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2007
Depreciation	$	57,068	$	15,499	$	754	$	73,321
Amortization		6,458		8,823		26,574		41,855
Total	$	63,526	$	24,322	$	27,328	$	115,176
	Visa U.S.A. historical expense for the year ended September 30, 2006		Visa Int’l, Visa Canada, Real Estate Joint Ventures historical expense for the year ended September 30, 2006		Pro Forma Adjustment		Total expense for the year ended September 30, 2006
Depreciation	$	123,361	$	33,022	$	3,370	$	159,753
Amortization		16,802		10,767		58,101		85,670
Total	$	140,163	$	43,789	$	61,471	$	245,423

125

The following table represents the estimated remaining useful lives we have assumed for each asset class to record the adjustment to historical depreciation and amortization:

	Estimated remaining useful lives
Facilities
Land	Not depreciated
Buildings and building improvements	17 to 30 years
Leasehold improvements	1 to 5 years
Furniture and fixtures	2 to 6 years
Equipment	1 to 4 years
Software	1.5 to 3 years

F - Represents the adjustment to record the fair value of certain Visa International other investments.

G - Represents the adjustments to record the fair value of identifiable intangible assets of Visa International, Visa Canada and Inovant and the related amortization of the new technologies acquired. These identifiable intangible assets include:

• Trademark - The value of the Visa brand utilized in Canada and the unincorporated regions of Visa International, which has been determined to have an indefinite life.

• Customer Relationships - The value of our relationships with our members in Canada and the unincorporated regions of Visa International, which has been determined to have an indefinite life.

• European Franchise Right - The value of the right to franchise the use of Visa brand, use of Visa technology and access to the overall Visa network in the Visa Europe region, which has been determined to have an indefinite life.

Technology - The value of internally developed software, which enables the Visa electronic payment network. We estimate that this asset has a remaining useful life of approximately three years.

H - Represents the adjustment to record goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets of the businesses acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill resulting from the acquisition is not amortized but is subject to impairment testing in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.

I - Represents the adjustments to the Visa International, Visa Canada and Inovant pension and post-retirement benefit obligations to reflect the difference between the present value of the estimated projected benefit obligation and the fair value of related plan assets, and to eliminate the unrecognized settlement losses recorded in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.

J - Represents the adjustment to eliminate the non-Visa U.S.A. historical ownership interest in Visa International, Visa Canada and Inovant as well as their historical minority interest in Inovant as a result of their acquisition by Visa U.S.A.

K - Represents the adjustment to record the fair value of Visa Inc. shares exchanged in the restructuring.

126

Income Tax Pro Forma Adjustments

L - Represents the adjustments to the historical deferred income tax assets and liabilities at March 31, 2007, and income tax expense for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as a result of consolidating the assets and liabilities of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Visa Canada, including:

• Adjustments to the tax provision of Visa U.S.A. related to the Visa U.S.A.’s interest in Visa International;

• Adjustments to the current state tax provision of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Inovant to account for consolidated apportioned statutory state rates; and

• Adjustments to Visa Canada related to the entity’s change in status from a not-for-profit corporation to a for-profit corporation.

M - Represents the adjustment to reflect the creation of deferred tax liabilities as a result of recording the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities of Visa International, Visa Canada and Inovant other than goodwill in excess of their historical book basis. These adjustments resulted in a net long-term deferred tax liability in our unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet at March 31, 2007. Also reflects the tax provision impact related to purchase accounting adjustments applied to the historical consolidated statement of operations for the six month ended March 31, 2007 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. In addition, we have presented all current deferred tax assets and liabilities as a single amount, as well as all non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities, in accordance with paragraph 42 of SFAS No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes.”

Visa Europe and Other Pro Forma Adjustments

N - Represents the adjustment to eliminate the minority interest and minority interest income (expense) attributable to the 10% ownership interest in Inovant held by Visa Europe.

O - Represents the adjustments to eliminate restructuring related transaction costs incurred by Visa International in the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as the restructuring is assumed to have occurred on October 1, 2005.

P - Represents the adjustment to historical card service fees to reflect the newly negotiated fee structure for on-going service fee commitments pursuant to the bilateral services agreement. For the purposes of our pro forma condensed combined statements of operations, the adjustment reduces historical card service fees to the amount of services Visa Europe is obligated to purchase from us at fixed prices in the 18 months following the restructuring. This adjustment does not reflect additional optional card services for which Visa Europe is entitled at its discretion at fixed prices under the bilateral services agreement.

Q - Represents the adjustment to historical data processing fees to reflect the newly negotiated fee structure for on-going data processing services pursuant to the bilateral services agreement. For the purposes of our pro forma condensed combined statements of operations presentation, the adjustment reduces historical data processing fees to the amount we would have earned under the newly negotiated fee structure based on actual transaction volume experienced in the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. This adjustment does not reflect optional fixed fee services, for which Visa Europe is entitled at its discretion under the bilateral services agreement.

R - Represents the adjustment to historical international transaction fees to reflect the impact of the new foreign exchange revenue sharing agreement with Visa Europe, pursuant to the bilateral services agreement.

S - Represents the adjustments to historical other revenues to record the fee that Visa Europe will pay us pursuant to the framework agreement. The adjustments reflect the first and second fee reduction components and accretion to revenue of the loss liability recorded in purchase accounting which we have calculated based on our assumptions as detailed in Note 3 “Trademark and Technology Licenses.”

127

T - Represents the adjustment to record the loss liability related to the trademark and technology licenses agreement, which we have determined, for financial accounting purposes, to be below fair value (see Note 3 “Trademark Agreement and Technology Licenses” for further information). Based upon our assumptions detailed in Note 3, we estimate that approximately $13.5 million of the loss liability accrual will accrete to revenue more than 12 months following the restructuring; therefore, this amount has been classified as long-term.

U - Represents the number of shares outstanding as a result of the restructuring.

V - Represents the adjustment to record the fair value of the put option held by Visa Europe (see Note 3 “The Put-Call Option Agreement” for further information).

128

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our capitalization as of March 31, 2007 on:

• an actual basis for Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada; and

• a pro forma basis for us assuming the restructuring occurred on March 31, 2007.

The table should be read in conjunction with “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes for each of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus. There has been no change to our capitalization since March 31, 2007 that would result in a material change to the pro forma capitalization set forth below.

	As of March 31, 2007
	Actual Visa U.S.A.			Actual Visa International		Actual Visa Canada			Pro Forma for the Restructuring
	(in thousands except share data)
Long-Term Debt	$	57,450		$	39,941	$	20		$	142,388
Members’/Stockholders Equity:
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value, 2,001,622,245,209 shares authorized and none issued		—			—		—			—
Class AP common stock, $0.0001 par value, 130,000,000 shares authorized and 119,100,481 issued		—			—		—			12
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value, 622,245,209 shares authorized and none issued		—			—		—			—
Class C common stock, $0.0001 par value, 917,165,602 shares authorized and none issued		—			—		—			—
Class Canada common stock, $0.0001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized and 22,034,685 issued		—			—		—			2
Class CEMEA common stock, $0.0001 par value, 42,000,000 shares authorized and 36,749,698 issued		—			—		—			4
Class EU common stock, $0.0001 par value, 103,582,801 shares authorized and 90,667,252 issued		—			—		—			9
Class LAC common stock, $0.0001 par value, 90,000,000 shares authorized and 80,137,915 issued		—			—		—			8
Class USA common stock, $0.0001 par value, 622,245,209 shares authorized and 426,390,481 issued		—			—		—			43
Additional Paid-in Capital		—			—		—			15,484,236
Accumulated Net Income		968,903			750,595		27,888			964,649
Accumulated other comprehensive Income/(Loss)		(445	)		54		(1,000	)		873
Total Members’/Stockholders’ Equity		968,458			750,649		26,888			16,449,836
Total Capitalization	$	1,025,908		$	790,590	$	26,908		$	16,592,224

129

THE GLOBAL PAYMENTS INDUSTRY

Visa operates in the global payments industry, which is undergoing a major shift from paper-based payments, such as cash and checks, to card-based and other electronic payments. For more than 30 years, Visa has played a central role in driving this migration by providing payment products and services that we believe deliver significant benefits to consumers, businesses, governments and merchants. We believe that consumers are increasingly attracted to the convenience, security, enhanced services and rewards associated with electronic payments. We also believe that corporations and governments are shifting to electronic payments to improve efficiency, control and security, and that a growing number of merchants are accepting electronic payments to improve sales and customer convenience.

Recent innovations such as chip cards, contactless cards and mobile payments also are contributing to the increased attractiveness of payment cards and other electronic payments. We believe this shift to electronic payment forms is a worldwide phenomenon; however, in many developing countries, it is at an early stage and will be accelerated by rising incomes, globalization of commerce and increased travel. We believe these trends illustrate a substantial growth opportunity for the global payments industry.

The global payments industry consists of all forms of payment and value transfer, including:

• paper-based payments: personal checks, cash, money orders, government checks, travelers cheques, official checks and other paper-based means of transferring value;

• card-based payments: credit cards, charge cards, debit cards, deferred debit cards, ATM cards, prepaid cards, private label cards and other types of general-purpose and limited-use cards; and

• other electronic payments: wire transfers, electronic benefits transfers, automated clearing house payments and other forms of electronic payment not typically tied to a payment card or similar access device.

General Purpose Cards

The most common card-based forms of payment are general-purpose cards, which are payment cards that permit widespread usage. General purpose cards are typically categorized as:

• “pay later” cards, which typically permit a cardholder to carry a balance in a revolving credit account (a credit card or deferred debit card) or require payment of the full balance within a specified period (a charge card);

• “pay now” cards, such as debit cards, which enable the cardholder to purchase goods and services by an automatic debit to a checking, demand deposit or other current account; and

• “pay before” cards, such as prepaid cards, which are prefunded up to a certain monetary value.

The primary global general purpose card brands include Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover, JCB and Diners Club. While these brands—including Visa—were historically associated primarily with credit or charge cards in the United States and other major international markets, Visa and others have over time broadened their offerings to include debit cards, ATM cards, prepaid cards and commercial cards.

Limited Purpose Cards

In addition to general purpose cards, a number of retailers and other entities issue limited-purpose credit, charge and prepaid cards that can be used for payment only at the issuing entity. These cards are generally referred to as private label cards. Private label cards are sometimes issued by a financial institution under a contractual agreement with the retailer.

130

Open-Loop Versus Closed-Loop Payment Networks

General purpose and limited-purpose payments networks primarily operate under two different business models. Open-loop payments networks, such as Visa and MasterCard, are multi-party and operate through a system that connects two financial institutions—one that issues the card to the cardholder, the issuing financial institution or issuer, and one that has the banking relationship with the merchant, the acquiring financial institution or acquirer—and manages information and the flow of value between them. In a typical closed-loop payments network, the payment services are provided directly to merchants and cardholders by the owner of the network, without involving third-party financial institution intermediaries. Closed-loop networks can range in size from networks such as American Express and Discover, which issue cards directly to consumers and serve merchants directly, to an individual merchant that issues limited-purpose private-label credit cards to its customers for use only in that merchant’s stores. In recent years, the major closed-loop networks have begun to develop relationships directly with financial institution issuers and acquirers, thereby emulating certain aspects of the open-loop networks.

Operators of open-loop networks such as Visa, generally do not issue cards, set fees or determine interest rates that cardholders are charged for use of their cards. Issuers have the responsibility for determining these and many other card features. In addition, such networks generally do not solicit merchants directly or establish the fees that merchants are charged for card acceptance, including the merchant discount rate. Both of these functions are generally the responsibility of acquirers. The following table outlines the major functions of each of the three major participants in the payments network.

	Issuer (Cardholder’s Financial Institution)	Payments network (e.g., Visa)	Acquirer (Merchant’s Financial Institution)
Primary Customers	Cardholders	Issuers and acquirers	Merchants
Products and Services	Issues cards to its cardholders based on payments network product platforms (e.g., credit, debit) Establishes and maintains accounts with cardholders (either consumers or businesses)	Offers broad range of product platforms (e.g. credit, debit) to financial institutions Operates data processing network that transfers transaction data and manages payment flow between issuers and acquirers	Establishes and maintains account with merchant to: —     Provide connectivity to a payments network —     Acquire receivables from merchant —     Guarantee payment to merchant for receivables
Branding	Issues cards that feature its own brand and that of a payments network	Establishes and maintains payments network brand for payment products and acceptance locations	Delivers payments network acceptance services under its own brand

131

	Issuer (Cardholder’s Financial Institution)	Payments network (e.g., Visa)	Acquirer (Merchant’s Financial Institution)
Rules and Terms	Establishes applicable cardholder terms, including fees, interest rates and payment schedules for cardholders independently of the payments network and in contract with its cardholders	Establishes rules and standards for its product platforms and payments network including: —     Eligibility for participation in network —     Authorization and clearing of transactions —     Financial settlement —     Product platform features and functionality —     Merchant acceptance standards —     Dispute resolution and arbitration processes	Establishes any applicable merchant fees and/or discount rates independently of the payments network and in contract with its merchants
Functions Performed in Connection with Payment Transaction*	Authorizes cardholder transactions Funds settlement obligations for its cardholder’s purchases Collects payment from cardholder Assumes risk of cardholder non-payment or late payment	Transfers authorization and clearing data and settles funds between issuer and acquirer Performs payments network risk management and related functions	Receives settlement funds from issuers Credits merchant for value of payment transactions Assumes risk of merchant non-fulfillment of transaction obligation Assumes responsibility for merchant compliance with network security and other rules

* In many instances, an issuer or acquirer may enter into an agreement with a third party processor to perform some of these functions on its behalf.

132

BUSINESS OF VISA INC.

Overview

Visa operates the world’s largest retail electronic payments network. We facilitate global commerce through the transfer of value and information among financial institutions, merchants, consumers, businesses and government entities, and the Visa brand is the world’s most recognized global financial services brand. Our primary customers are financial institutions for which we provide processing services and payment product platforms, including platforms for consumer credit, debit, prepaid and commercial payments. Our centralized and integrated payments transaction processing system allows us to offer a broad range of product platforms, transaction processing and related services, including fraud and risk management, dispute resolution, loyalty applications, and value-added information services. Our customers reported that, as of December 31, 2006, there were more than 1.3 billion cards in circulation carrying our brands: Visa, Visa Electron, PLUS and Interlink. According to information reported to us by our customers, these cards were accepted at more than 26 million merchant outlets and one million ATMs, and the total payments and cash volume on these cards during calendar year 2006 was more than $3.2 trillion. We believe that, based on our brand, size and product breadth, we are the leading electronic payments company in the world.

Our business primarily consists of the following:

• we offer a wide range of branded payments product platforms, which our customers use to develop and offer credit, charge, deferred debit, debit, prepaid and cash access programs for cardholders (individuals, businesses and government entities);

• we own a family of well-known, widely-accepted payment brands, including Visa, Visa Electron, PLUS and Interlink, which we license to our customers for use in their payment programs;

• we manage and promote our brands for the benefit of our customers through advertising, promotional and sponsorship initiatives and by encouraging card usage and merchant acceptance;

• we provide transaction processing services (primarily authorization, clearing and settlement) to our customers through VisaNet, our secure, centralized, global processing platform;

• we provide various other value-added processing-related services to our customers, including fraud and risk management services, dispute management services, information services and processing services;

• we develop new products and services to enable our customers to offer efficient and effective payment methods to their cardholders and merchants; and

• we adopt and enforce rules applicable to our customers to ensure the efficient and secure functioning of our payments network and the maintenance and promotion of our brands.

133

We derive revenues primarily from fees paid by our customers based on payments volume, from fees paid by our customers for transaction messages that we process, and from fees paid in connection with certain other related services that we provide. Payments volume is the total monetary value of transactions for goods and services purchased with our cards, as reported by our customers. Cash volume generally includes cash access transactions, balance transfers and convenience check transactions associated with our products. Total dollar volume, which we consider to be an important measure of the scale of our business, is the sum of payments volume and cash volume. The table below shows our product performance for calendar year 2006, according to data reported to us by our customers:

Visa Inc. Product Performance

Calendar Year 2006

All numbers in billions, except as noted

	U.S.A.		AP		Canada		LAC		CEMEA		Visa Inc. Total
Payments Volume
Consumer Credit	$	607	$	377	$	118	$	69	$	17	$	1,188
Consumer Debit*		604		20		0		36		25		685
Commercial & Other		174		60		14		5		2		255
Total Payments Volume	$	1,385	$	457	$	132	$	110	$	43	$	2,127
Cash Volume	$	368	$	223	$	16	$	268	$	228	$	1,103
Total Volume	$	1,752	$	680	$	148	$	378	$	271	$	3,230
Total Transactions (millions)**		27,447		7,252		1,313		5,783		2,262		44,058

* Includes prepaid volume

** Total transactions represents total transactions involving our cards as reported by our customers and includes transactions that are not processed on our VisaNet processing system.

Note: Numbers do not add exactly due to rounding.

Based on payments volume, total volume, number of transactions and number of cards in circulation, we are the largest retail electronic payments network in the world. The following chart compares our network with those of our major competitors, for calendar year 2006:

Company	Payments Volume		Total Volume		Transactions	Cards
	(billions)		(billions)		(billions)	(millions)
Visa Inc.*	$	2,127	$	3,230	44.1	1,254
MasterCard	$	1,417	$	1,922	23.4	817
American Express	$	556	$	562	4.5	78
Discover	$	96	$	114	1.4	57
JCB	$	63	$	70	0.7	59
Diners Club	$	22	$	22	0.1	7

* Reported global figures from The Nilson Report, less Visa internal data for Visa Europe

Note: MasterCard figures include PIN-based debit card transactions on MasterCard cards, but not Maestro. Domestic China figures on Visa and MasterCard cards have been excluded. Numbers may not sum due to rounding. Visa and MasterCard figures exclude proprietary PLUS and Cirrus. American Express and Discover figures include business from third-party issuers. JCB figures are for October 2005 through September 2006 (fiscal year). JCB total transaction and purchase transaction figures are estimates.

Source: The Nilson Report, issues 874 and 877.

134

Organization after the Restructuring

Visa International is currently owned by Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada, Visa Europe and the equity member financial institutions located in the three unincorporated regions of Visa International. These unincorporated regions are operating divisions within Visa International and represent three geographic regions: Visa AP; Visa LAC; and Visa CEMEA. Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe are each currently owned by member financial institutions within their respective geographic regions. Visa Inc. was incorporated on May 25, 2007 as a Delaware stock corporation. If the restructuring is completed, each of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada will become wholly owned subsidiaries of Visa Inc., and Visa Europe will remain a separate legal entity with its own business operations. Our relationship with Visa Europe will be governed after the restructuring by a framework agreement.

Our Competitive Strengths

Leading Global Brand

Visa is one of the most recognized consumer brands in the world and is the most recognized global financial services brand. We believe merchants, consumers and our financial institution customers associate our brand with trust, security, reliability, efficiency, convenience and empowerment. The strength of our brand allows us to increase card usage in existing and new market segments, develop and offer innovative payment products and services, and enhance the utility of our payments network for all participants.

World’s Largest Payments Network

We operate the world’s largest retail electronic payments network. Our customers reported that, as of December 31, 2006, there were more than 1.3 billion cards in circulation carrying our brands: Visa, Visa Electron, PLUS and Interlink. According to information reported to us by our customers, these cards were accepted at more than 26 million merchant outlets and 1 million ATMs, and the total volume on these cards during calendar year 2006 was more than $3.2 trillion. We believe that merchants, cardholders and our customers benefit from the Visa cardholder base, which is the largest in the world, and our merchant acceptance network, which is unsurpassed globally.

Unique Global Payments Processing Platform

We own and operate VisaNet, our secure, centralized, global processing platform. VisaNet is highly reliable, and we processed more than 72 billion transaction messages through VisaNet in calendar year 2006. (The processing of a single transaction may involve more than one transaction message.) VisaNet’s centralized and integrated architecture allows us to provide real-time, value-added information to our customers. In addition, our centralized platform provides us the flexibility to develop, modify, and enhance our products, services and processing platform efficiently.

Comprehensive Payment Products and Services

We believe we provide our financial institution customers with a comprehensive suite of electronic payment products and services. Our product platforms encompass credit, debit, cash access and prepaid products for consumers, businesses and governments. Our product platforms enable our customers to develop and customize their own payment programs to meet the needs of their geographic markets. We also offer our customers issuer processing in support of our debit and prepaid platforms, and we are the largest issuer processor for Visa debit transactions in the United States. We also offer a broad range of value-added services such as enhanced risk management, dispute processing, loyalty and other information-based services, which are enabled by our centralized global processing platform.

Established and Long Standing Customer Relationships

We have long standing relationships with the majority of our customers, and long-term contracts with many of our major customers, both of which have provided a significant level of stability to our business. More than

135

two-thirds of our customers have been customers for longer than ten years. We believe that our many years of close cooperation with our customers in developing new products, processing capabilities and value-added services have enabled us to establish strong customer relationships. By virtue of these relationships, we believe we are well-positioned to continue developing new products, systems and applications that will increase our value to our customers and enhance our competitive position.

Our Primary Operations

There are three core aspects of our business operations: our transaction processing services, our product platforms and management of our payments network.

Transaction Processing Services

Core Processing Services

Our core processing services involve the routing of payment information and related data to facilitate the authorization, clearing and settlement of transactions between Visa issuers and acquirers. In addition, we offer a range of value-added processing services to support our customers’ Visa programs and to promote the growth and security of the Visa payments network.

Authorization is the process of approving or declining a transaction before a purchase is finalized or cash is disbursed. Clearing is the process of delivering final transaction data from an acquirer to an issuer for posting to the cardholder’s account, the calculation of certain fees and charges that apply to the issuer and acquirer involved in the transaction, and the conversion of transaction amounts to the appropriate settlement currencies. Settlement is the process of calculating, determining and reporting the net financial position of our issuers and acquirers for all transactions that are cleared.

Visa transactions can be authorized, cleared and settled either as dual-message transactions or as single-message transactions. The choice of processing method may vary depending upon the issuer, the type of card or the region in which the transaction takes place.

• In a single-message transaction, the acquirer submits a single electronic message containing all data required for the authorization, clearing and settlement of the transaction. Actual financial settlement occurs at a later time.

• In a dual-message transaction, the acquirer submits an electronic message at the time of purchase containing the information required for an authorization decision and a second message at a later point in time containing additional data required for clearing and settlement.

Authorization

A typical Visa transaction begins when the cardholder presents his or her Visa card to a merchant as payment for goods or services. The transaction information is then transmitted electronically to the issuer for authorization. In certain cases, we may authorize the transaction on behalf of the issuer through a service known as stand-in processing, based on parameters established by the issuer. The following diagram illustrates the processing steps involved in a typical transaction authorized through our network. In a typical Visa transaction, the authorization process by Visa occurs in approximately one second.

1. The cardholder presents the merchant with a Visa card for payment. The merchant point of sale terminal reads the account number and other data encoded on the card’s magnetic stripe or chip.

136

2. The merchant terminal transmits the card information and transaction amount to the acquirer.

3. The acquiring bank or its third party processor combines the transaction information into an authorization request message and transmits it to Visa.

4. Visa routes the authorization request to the issuer for review. In certain circumstances, such as when the issuer’s systems are unavailable, Visa may perform stand-in processing and review and authorize or deny the transaction.

5. The issuing bank or its third party processor returns an authorization response message, either approving or denying the transaction to Visa.

6. Visa routes the authorization response to the acquirer.

7. The acquirer transmits the result of the authorization request to the merchant terminal.

Clearing and Settlement

Clearing occurs at the time of the authorization, for single-message transactions, or in a single daily batch message containing all transactions reported by the acquirer, for dual-message transactions. Settlement occurs on each business day and is conducted on a net basis for all transactions submitted during the previous settlement cycle. The following diagram illustrates the clearing and settlement process between the issuer and acquirer for a typical transaction processed through our system.

Clearing

1. The merchant transmits sales draft information for the transaction, including account numbers and transaction amounts, to the acquirer.

2. The acquiring bank or its third party processor formats this information into a clearing message, which it transmits to Visa.

3. Visa routes the clearing message to the card issuer and calculates the settlement obligation of the issuer and the amount due to the acquirer, net of certain applicable fees and charges.

Settlement

4. The issuer sends funds to Visa’s designated settlement bank in the amount of its settlement obligation.

5. The settlement bank, at the direction of Visa, transfers funds due to the acquirer.

The issuer and acquirer involved in a typical Visa transaction perform additional functions that we do not generally perform or monitor. For example, the acquirer credits the merchant’s account for the amount of the transaction less any fees the acquirer charges in accordance with the contractual agreement between the merchant and the acquirer. In addition, the issuer sends a statement to the cardholder and collects payment, in the case of a credit or deferred debit card, or collects payment directly from the cardholder’s deposit account, in the case of a debit card.

We process virtually all transactions within the United States, as well as all cross-border transactions, involving products carrying our brands. Outside of the United States and certain other countries, we do not process the majority of the domestic transactions, i.e., transactions where the issuer and the merchant are located in the same country, on products carrying our brands.

137

We will continue to perform clearing and settlement through our VisaNet system for transactions involving an issuer that is located in Visa Europe’s region and an acquirer that is located in the rest of the world, or vice versa. In addition, we will continue to provide clearing and settlement services for Visa transactions occurring entirely within Visa Europe’s region until completion of deployment of Visa Europe’s own processing system. Visa Europe currently authorizes transactions for its members through its own processing system, and it will continue to do so after the restructuring.

Other Value-Added Processing Services

The size of our network and our processing capabilities allow us to offer a range of other value-added services in certain countries. These services include fraud and risk management, loyalty, dispute resolution, and issuer transaction processing.

Risk Management Services. Our centralized and integrated network architecture allows us to monitor on a real-time basis all transactions that we process for authorization. As a result, we provide customers in certain regions with a number of value-added risk-management services, which complement our core authorization services. Our risk management services provide preventive, monitoring, investigative and predictive tools, which are intended to mitigate and help eliminate fraud at the cardholder and merchant level. As an example, Visa Advanced Authorization, which we introduced in 2005, enables us to monitor and evaluate VisaNet authorization requests in real-time and deliver enhanced transaction risk scores to issuers as part of the authorization message. It is the first system of its kind to deliver risk indicators in real time by assessing transaction data on both an account level and a transaction level.

Our AdvanceBK Service is a bankruptcy prediction tool, which uses advanced predictive modeling techniques to reduce bankruptcy losses for our issuers through early detection of high-risk accounts. The service aggregates consumer transaction data across multiple accounts and multiple issuers to assess the likelihood that a consumer will file for bankruptcy over the following 18 months. AdvanceBK provides participating issuers with monthly bankruptcy risk scores for all of their accounts and daily alerts for high-risk accounts that are actively transacting. Analyzing transaction attributes at the consumer level, AdvanceBK can identify accounts that do not demonstrate typical risky behaviors, but that may result in future bankruptcies.

Loyalty Services. We offer loyalty services that allow our customers to enhance the attractiveness of their Visa payment programs and to strengthen their relationships with cardholders and merchants. These services are designed to allow our customers to differentiate their Visa program offerings, to support increased card usage, and to increase the importance of Visa payments to merchants.

Visa Extras is a service that participating issuers may offer to their cardholders to increase card usage, enhance the value of their Visa programs and create stronger cardholder relationships. Visa Extras is a points-based program that rewards cardholders for using their enrolled Visa cards to make qualifying purchases. Cardholders can redeem points for rewards in the Visa Extras rewards catalog for everyday items such as movie tickets, retail gift certificates, merchandise, travel certificates, dining rewards, and more.

The Visa Incentive Network enables merchants and customer financial institutions to deliver tailored merchant offers to targeted groups of cardholders. Visa Incentive Network offers benefits traditionally associated with a closed-loop system. Visa Incentive Network was launched in April 2005 and allows us to deliver merchant promotions to affluent and high-spending Visa cardholders on behalf of participating issuers. Based on merchant-specific cardholder spending and location criteria for each promotion, we can analyze the spending patterns of Visa credit card holders in the United States whose information is provided to us by participating card issuers. We then deliver the promotion to the appropriate cardholders on behalf of our issuers. In order to protect cardholder privacy, the merchant does not gain access to cardholder information or underlying transaction data. The Visa Incentive Network database contains more than 70 million accounts. Visa Incentive Network is enabled through account level processing, which allows transactions to be processed and afforded customized treatment

138

at the account level–i.e., by identifying each transaction by the entire 16 digit account number–rather than by the six-digit bank identification number, or BIN, as is the more typical industry practice. We are able to implement account level processing as a result of our reengineered Visa Integrated Payment platform, as described below.

Dispute Management Services. We manage Visa Resolve Online, an automated web-based service that allows our customers’ back-office analysts and customer service representatives to manage and resolve Visa transaction disputes more efficiently than with previous paper-based processes. Transaction disputes between issuers and acquirers sometimes arise from suspected fraud, merchant non-fulfillment of transaction requirements or other events. Visa Resolve Online, which is mandatory for all Visa customers, provides real-time access to Visa transaction data, electronic transfer of substantiating documents, and automated management of communications between issuers and acquirers.

Value-Added Information Services. We provide our customers with a range of additional information-based business analytics and applications, as well as the transaction data and associated infrastructure required to support them. Through these services, we support and enhance our customers’ business intelligence capabilities, loyalty applications, operational and management performance metrics, transaction research and commercial card reporting.

Debit Issuer Processing Services. Visa Debit Processing Services provides comprehensive processing services for participating United States issuers of Visa debit, prepaid and ATM payment products. In addition to core issuer authorization processing, Visa Debit Processing Services offers card management services, exception processing, PIN and ATM network gateways, call center services, fraud detection services and ATM terminal driving. Visa Debit Processing Services processes more Visa transactions than any other issuer processor in the world.

Processing Infrastructure

We own and operate VisaNet, our secure, centralized, global processing platform, which consists of three synchronized processing centers. In addition, Visa Europe operates one processing center in the UK, which is part of our synchronized system. These centers are linked by a global telecommunications network, which is engineered for redundancy. Intelligent access points around the world complete our global processing infrastructure and enable merchants and financial institutions worldwide to access our core processing and value-added services.

In September 2006, we completed a five-year reengineering program, in which we, among other things, consolidated the authorization functions for our credit, debit, prepaid and ATM transactions into one technology platform called Visa Integrated Payment, or VIP. VIP is a modular processing platform, which is flexible and secure and combines global reach with the processing power to support our future growth and product innovation.

The following is a summary of critical attributes of our processing infrastructure:

Centralized Architecture. Our VisaNet system is built on a centralized architecture rather than a distributed architecture. As a result, we are able to view and analyze each authorization transaction we process in real time and can provide value-added information, such as risk scoring or loyalty applications, to the issuer while the transaction data is being routed through our system.

Redundancy. Our global telecommunications network and processing centers are designed for redundancy and fail-over. Our newest processing center houses multiple authorization engines under one roof, each supported by redundant power and telecommunications circuits. This new architecture complements our multiple processing center architecture, provides improved fail-over technology and helps to ensure that our VisaNet system is always available and has enough processing power to meet the growing demand for electronic payments.

139

Modular Architecture. In the VIP reengineering project that we completed in September 2006, we replaced a complex web of legacy code with a streamlined, layered, modular architecture. We believe that this new architecture significantly reduces the time, complexity and cost involved in adding functions or modifying the system to support emerging forms of payments, such as contactless and mobile payments. We also believe that this streamlined architecture was instrumental in our ability to implement account level processing on our systems in less than twelve months.

Processing Scale. During calendar year 2006, we processed more than 72 billion transaction messages. Based on tests that we conducted with IBM in July 2005, we estimate that VisaNet is capable of processing more than 12,000 transaction messages per second. We believe that the scale of our processing network provides us with a significant cost advantage over our competitors.

Payment Product Platforms

We offer a broad range of product platforms to enable our customers to build differentiated, competitive payment programs for their consumer, business, government and merchant clients. Our principal payment platforms enable credit, charge, deferred debit, debit and prepaid payments, as well as cash access, for consumers, businesses and government entities. Our payment platforms are offered under our Visa, Visa Electron, Interlink and PLUS brands.

Consumer Credit

Our consumer credit product platforms allow our issuers to offer deferred payment and financing products that can be customized to meet the needs of all consumer segments. Our baseline consumer credit platform is marketed to our issuers as Visa Traditional in the United States and Visa Classic in the rest of the world. We require issuers offering credit products based on this platform to meet minimum requirements for product functionality and to offer certain services, such as a reporting service for lost or stolen cards.

In addition, we offer premium credit platforms, which enable our issuers to tailor programs to consumers requiring higher credit lines or enhanced benefits, such as loyalty programs. Our premium consumer credit platforms are marketed to issuers, and in some cases, to cardholders, as Visa Gold, Visa Platinum, Visa Signature, and Visa Infinite. Issuers offering these credit products are required to provide certain functionality and enhanced cardholder services that may vary by product and region. For example, we require that issuers provide a minimum level of cardholder rewards value and that they not impose a preset spending limit on Visa Signature cards.

We provide a number of additional services that many issuers choose to offer in conjunction with their Visa credit programs, even where we may not require the inclusion of such services. Certain of these services, such as emergency card replacement, travel assistance services, and rental car insurance, are provided by third parties under contract with us.

Consumer Deposit Access

Our deposit access product platforms enable our issuers to offer consumer payment and cash access products that draw upon consumer deposit accounts, such as checking, demand deposit, asset or other pre-funded accounts. During calendar year 2006, consumer debit and cash access products accounted for the majority of Visa transactions worldwide.

Consumer Debit

Visa Debit. Our primary consumer debit platform uses the Visa brand mark. Through our rules and product platform requirements, we further segment our Visa debit product platform into Visa Classic, Visa Gold, Visa Platinum, and Visa Infinite, which allows our issuers to customize their Visa debit programs and offer a range of benefits to their debit cardholders.

140

Interlink Debit. We provide the Interlink debit product platform in the United States and certain countries in the Visa AP region. Interlink is a single-message point-of-sale debit network. It generally requires a cardholder to enter a personal identification number, or PIN, for authentication. Interlink allows our issuers to provide a full range of debit card offerings to their deposit account customers. Interlink acceptance marks may be included on Visa debit cards or issued as standalone debit cards.

Visa Electron Debit. Visa Electron is a payment product platform that permits issuers to require all transactions initiated from the card to be authorized electronically. It is primarily used by issuers offering payment programs to higher risk customer segments or in countries where electronic authorization is less prevalent, such as certain markets in the Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA regions. Visa Electron is primarily issued as a consumer debit product, but Visa Electron can also be issued as a credit or prepaid product for consumers or businesses.

POS Check Service. The Visa POS Check Service enables merchants to convert the account information on a consumer’s check into an electronic Visa transaction message at the point of sale if the check is drawn on a demand deposit account held at a participating Visa customer. This service, which is currently offered only in the United States, reduces the cost and time involved in merchant and financial institution processing of checks by taking advantage of Visa’s efficient electronic payments processing.

Cash Access

Our customers can provide global cash access to their cardholders by issuing products accepted at Visa and PLUS branded ATMs. Most Visa and Visa Electron branded cards offer customers cash access at ATMs, as well as at branches of our participating customer financial institutions. The PLUS brand may also be included on issuers’ non-Visa branded cards to offer international cash access as a complement to domestic cash access services. We believe that more than one million Visa and PLUS branded ATMs are available in more than 170 countries. Payment cards may contain multiple cash access brand marks, in addition to Visa and PLUS, and transactions involving Visa and PLUS branded cards will generally be processed through our systems only if there is no regional or domestic ATM brand that is capable of processing the transaction.

Prepaid

Our prepaid product platform enables issuers to offer products that access a designated pool of funds, allowing cardholders to enjoy the convenience and security of a payment card in lieu of cash or checks. Our prepaid platform includes gift cards, travel cards, youth cards, payroll cards, money transfer cards, voucher replacement cards, corporate incentive cards, insurance reimbursement cards and government benefits cards. Our prepaid platforms are also used to pay highway tolls and to top up prepaid mobile phones in some regions. Prepaid products can be issued as either reloadable or disposable. Reloadable cards enable consumers or third parties such as employers to add additional funds to the pool. Consumers may reload cards through various channels, including merchants and participating customer financial institutions. Disposable cards cannot be reloaded in this manner. Our prepaid cards can be distributed through a number of channels, including bank branches, Internet sites, merchants, and employers.

Commercial

Our commercial product platforms enable multinational, large, medium and small companies and government organizations to streamline payment processes, manage information and their supply chain, and reduce administrative costs. Our commercial platforms include Visa Business Credit, Visa Business Check Card, Visa Business Debit, Visa Signature Business, Visa Business Electron, Visa Corporate, Visa Purchasing, Visa Fleet, Visa Distribution, Visa Commercial One Card and Visa Commerce.

Large and Medium Companies and Government Organizations. The Visa Corporate product platform offers payment options for travel and entertainment charges, including cash advances, and provides detailed transaction

141

data, which allows companies to track policy compliance and supplier management. Visa Purchasing provides corporate clients with a payment product to easily acquire the goods and services needed to conduct their business by streamlining time- and paper-intensive purchase order and invoice processing, and by providing flexible transaction authorization and verification statements for each cardholder. A sub-product of Visa Purchasing, Visa Fleet, provides specialized authorization controls that fleet operators need to monitor and manage spending for company-provided vehicles. Visa Distribution provides an accounts receivable service for suppliers with dispersed operations. The Visa Commercial One Card allows organizations to combine procurement, travel and entertainment, and fleet functionality into a single payment solution. Visa Commerce is a business-to-business electronic platform providing accounts payable and accounts receivable payment services to facilitate large transactions between contracted buyers and sellers.

Small Businesses. The Visa Business credit and debit platforms provide small businesses with cash flow tools, purchasing savings, rewards and management reporting. Visa Business Electron is an electronic authorization platform used in many countries outside North America, and has authorization control attributes that are similar to those of the consumer Visa Electron products described above.

Core to all Visa Commercial payment platforms are information management, reconciliation and reporting, which integrate payment data into company financial systems. Visa Information Management is a web-based tool that provides access to a suite of reporting and information tools in multiple languages to companies using any of the Visa Commercial platforms.

Product Platform Innovation

We invest in the development and enhancement of payment product platforms with the goal of increasing the migration of consumer and business spending to electronic payments. We believe that innovation results in more secure and versatile payment program options for our customers, merchants and consumers. We focus on new payment channels, card technologies, payment account access devices and authentication methods, and have recently made significant investments in the development of money transfer services, magnetic stripe and unembossed card enhancements, chip cards, contactless payment devices and mobile payments.

Money Transfer. Visa Money Transfer is a remittance platform that our customers use to allow their cardholders to send funds to other Visa cardholders with accounts at participating financial institutions. The funds are credited directly to the individual’s Visa credit, debit or prepaid account. Our customers can deploy our standard Visa Money Transfer service, which includes sophisticated anti-money laundering, fraud and risk controls, or they can develop their own customized services. As of December 31, 2006, Visa Money Transfer was operative in three countries in Visa AP, including India, where over 48 million Visa cardholders were eligible to receive remittances on their Visa cards. Our customers also offer domestic and cross-border money transfer services using Visa prepaid cards in Visa LAC, Visa CEMEA and Visa AP.

Magnetic Stripe and Unembossed Card Enhancements. Beginning in October 2003, we introduced a series of rules and standards that allow our customers in certain regions to issue magnetic-stripe Visa cards with enhanced authorization requirements and risk controls that increase their ability to offer Visa cards to high-risk consumer segments. These standards include codes on the magnetic stripe that instruct point-of-sale terminals to request real-time transaction authorizations from the card issuer, providing an increased level of transaction authorization over traditional magnetic-stripe cards that lack such codes. These standards also permit issuers in certain countries to issue magnetic stripe Visa cards with the cardholder name and account number printed on the card, rather than embossed with raised lettering. These unembossed cards reduce the risk of fraudulent card use at merchants that do not have electronic point of sale terminals that are capable of seeking transaction authorizations from the card issuer.

Chip Cards. In certain regions and countries, we support customer issuance of Visa and Visa Electron chip cards, which are compliant with the EMV Integrated Circuit Card Specifications for Payment Systems. In

142

addition to a traditional magnetic stripe, chip cards carry encrypted account data on an embedded computer chip that is read by a point-of-sale terminal. Chip cards can offer increased data security over traditional magnetic-stripe-only cards and can reduce the incidence of certain types of fraud. Our customers reported that as December 31, 2006, more than 90 million Visa and Visa Electron branded chip cards were in circulation.

Contactless Payment Cards and Devices. We support customer issuance and merchant acceptance of EMV-compliant contactless payment cards and devices, including contactless-enabled cards, minicards and microtags. A contactless device contains a computer chip that securely stores account information and transmits it to merchant terminals via secure radio-frequency technology that operates over short distances. Contactless devices can increase speed and convenience at the point of sale by allowing a consumer to complete a transaction without the need to swipe a card manually or insert it into a point-of-sale device. We believe that contactless technology is particularly appealing to merchants in segments with high point-of-sale throughput and a large proportion of small-value transactions. As of December 31, 2006, our customers had issued more than 6.5 million of our contactless payment devices around the world.

Mobile Payments. We support payment origination and acceptance by mobile devices, such as mobile telephones and wireless data devices. In 2007, we introduced the Visa Mobile Platform, a global initiative that provides a comprehensive suite of technology tools and applications designed to promote product development and commercialization of mobile payment services. The Visa Mobile Platform is designed to provide consumers with a consistent experience for all types of payments, regardless of phone type or geography, and is designed to work within the existing infrastructure established by mobile carriers and financial institutions. In addition to supporting the development of mobile payment solutions, such as contactless payments, mobile Internet payments and person-to-person payment, the platform also supports the development of payment-related services, such as account management services to enable consumers to monitor account activity through a mobile device, and mobile coupons that can be redeemed at the point of sale.

Payments Network Management

We devote significant resources to ensure that Visa is the payments network of choice for customers, merchants and cardholders. We seek to accomplish this by promoting our brand through marketing and sponsorship activities, increasing acceptance of Visa branded cards around the world and ensuring that the system operates in a reliable and secure manner for all of our network participants.

Brand Management and Promotion

We engage in a variety of activities designed to maintain and enhance the value of our brand. Our integrated approach to brand management and promotion combines advertising, sponsorships, promotions and public relations to create programs that build active preference for products carrying our brand, promote product usage, increase product acceptance, and support cardholder acquisition and retention. For merchants, we work to ensure that the Visa brand represents timely and guaranteed payment, as well as a way to increase their business profitably. For our customers, our marketing is designed to support their card issuance, activation and usage efforts while complementing and enhancing the value of their own brands. For cardholders, we work to ensure that Visa is a symbol of security, convenience and acceptance. By emphasizing these core attributes of our brand, we aim to reinforce the recognition that Visa is the “World’s Best Way to Pay.”

Advertising plays a critical role in building brand awareness and equity, as well as communicating the benefits of our brand and Visa branded payment products. Through our advertising campaigns, we strive to provide a consistent, recognizable and compelling message that supports our brand positioning. During 2006, we launched our “Life Takes Visa” brand campaign in the United States, reinforcing our brand promise to deliver innovative products and services that empower our cardholders to experience life and business their way and on their terms. In other regions, we promote these same brand messages through tailored regional and country-specific advertising campaigns, such as our “All It Takes” campaign in Visa AP and our “La Vida es Ahora” campaign in Visa LAC.

143

We establish global marketing relationships to promote the Visa brand and to allow customers to conduct marketing programs in conjunction with major sporting and entertainment events. Through these marketing relationships, our customers may develop marketing programs that include the Visa brand and mention our sponsorship status. Our primary global sponsorship platform is the Olympic Games, for which we have been the exclusive payment card sponsor since 1986. Approximately 1,200 customers in 46 countries, including 12 members of Visa Europe, executed Visa marketing programs in conjunction with the 2006 Torino Games. Our current commitment to the Olympic Games extends through the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Games, and the 2012 London Olympic Games. We also maintain major sponsorships with the Paralympic Games and the Rugby World Cup. In addition, we engage in marketing and sponsorship activities around other national and local events or with associations and companies to provide customized marketing platforms to customers in certain countries and regions.

Our customer and business partner marketing consulting services provide customized advice and support to improve our customers’ cardholder acquisition, cardholder retention and product usage efforts. We conduct strategic reviews of our customers’ marketing activities and portfolio management practices, help them develop acquisition and retention programs, develop marketing for new products, conduct market segmentation analysis, and perform other consultative services. In addition to customized consulting projects, we offer training to provide our customers with an understanding of best practices for managing their payments business.

We also provide marketing support to our customers through our support of Visa co-branded and affinity card programs. Co-branded cards are payment cards bearing the brand marks of an issuer and a marketing partner, usually a merchant, while affinity cards generally bear the marks or logos of charitable, professional, educational or civic organizations.

Our merchant marketing activities bring added value to our merchant partners through the development of marketing programs customized for specific merchants and industry segments. These programs, which we develop in conjunction with merchants, generate awareness for new acceptance channels and locations and increase cardholder spending and merchant sales revenue through special offers and promotions.

Merchant Acceptance Initiatives

Merchants play a vital role in our payments network, and we work continuously to build our merchant acceptance and enhance our relationships with merchants that accept Visa branded cards. As of December 31, 2006, our customers reported that our cards were accepted at more than 26 million merchant outlets around the world.

We aim to maintain and expand our merchant base by focusing on the needs of merchants and consumers and enhancing our programs to increase acceptance in attractive and fast-growing segments, such as bill payment. Our efforts to address these needs include supporting the development of technological innovations, delivering value-added information services, such as the Visa Incentive Network, and evaluating potential modifications to our operating rules and interchange rates to enhance the value of our payments network compared to other forms of payment. In the United States for example, the Visa Small Ticket Payment Service provides a special interchange rate category and No Signature Required programs eliminate the requirement for a cardholder signature for certain small-value transactions in a number of everyday spend categories, including quick-service restaurants, movie theatres, and public transit. Under this program, the merchant will be protected against no signature chargebacks. We believe these initiatives have resulted in a faster check-out process, a reduction in merchants’ operating expenses, increased merchant acceptance and greater transaction volume in these categories.

For certain merchant segments, we have modified our rules to accommodate their specific business practices and facilitate their acceptance of Visa cards. For example, the International Airline Program enables airlines with operations in multiple countries to consolidate their acquiring relationship and simplify the submission of transaction information.

144

We enter into arrangements with certain merchants under which these merchants receive monetary incentives and rebates for acceptance of products carrying our brands and increasing their payments volume of products carrying our brands or indicating a preference for our cards.

High volume merchants that operate in a multi-lane retail environment where speed and reliability at the point of sale are critical can use Visa Merchant Direct Exchange, which provides a single, secure and extensible Internet Protocol (IP)-based connection to the VisaNet network for all entities connected to Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, and which allows each of these entities or endpoints to securely exchange proprietary data with us and each other.

We continue to respond to the needs of merchants in order to enhance the efficiency of the Visa payments network for the benefit of all network participants. For example, in 2006, we enabled merchants in the United States to obtain copies of key provisions of our U.S. Operating Regulations, thereby increasing access to the rules and procedures that govern merchant participation in our system. We also published our U.S. interchange rate schedule and made our U.S. interchange rate qualification guide available to merchants in an effort to educate merchants about the structure of our customer interchange rates and the criteria that determine the specific rate for which a given transaction qualifies.

Membership Standards

Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada are non–stock corporations, which are directly or indirectly owned by their financial institution members. The membership interests carry not only voting and economic rights, but an important license right so that our financial institution members can participate in and benefit from the Visa payments system. As a result of the proposed restructuring, the membership interests in Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada will be split into two portions—an economic and voting interest, which will be exchanged in the restructuring for shares of Visa Inc. common stock and a continuing nonvoting, with limited exceptions, non-economic license right, which will enable the financial institution to continue to participate in the Visa payment network. While the membership interests will no longer have voting, with limited exceptions or economic rights, by retaining the membership structure at the subsidiary level, we believe that we retain important flexibility in operating our network through our operating regulations and rules, which benefits us, our member/customers, cardholders and merchants. Throughout this section, we refer to our financial institution customers as “members.”

Our members are generally required to be financial institutions or other deposit-taking institutions organized under local banking laws or wholly owned by such institutions. Principal members that are financial institutions may participate in the full range of membership functions, such as soliciting cardholders and issuing cards, soliciting and signing merchants and acquiring merchant transactions. Principal members may also sponsor other financial institutions for levels of membership that involve more limited participation in our network.

Rulemaking and Enforcement

In general, our members are granted licenses to use our brands and access to our transaction processing systems. Our members are obligated to honor rules and standards established by us, which apply to their use of our branded programs and their participation in our transaction processing system. Variations on such rules and standards may exist in different regions and countries to meet the needs of local markets. We require our members to comply with these rules, which relate to such matters as the use of our brands and trademarks, the standards, design and features of payment cards and programs, merchant acquiring activities, including acceptance standards applicable to merchants, use of agents, disputes between members, risk management, guaranteed settlement, member financial failures and allocation of losses among members.

We establish dispute resolution procedures between members relating to specific transactions. For example, after a transaction is presented to an issuer, the issuer may determine that the transaction is invalid for a variety

145

of reasons, including fraud. If the issuer believes there is a defect in a transaction, the issuer may return, or charge back, the transaction to the acquirer. We enforce rules relating to chargebacks and act as an arbitrator of last resort with respect to chargeback disputes.

Member Risk Management

We indemnify our members for any loss suffered due to the failure of a member to fund its daily settlement obligations because of technical problems, liquidity shortfall, insolvency or other reasons. In certain instances we indemnify members even in situations in which a transaction is not processed by our system. No material loss related to settlement risk was incurred for fiscal 2006, 2005 or 2004.

To manage our exposure in the event our members fail to fund their settlement obligations, we have a member risk policy with a formalized set of credit standards and risk control measures. Members with significant settlement exposure are evaluated regularly to assess risk. In certain instances, we may require a member to post collateral, typically in cash equivalents, government securities, letters of credit or guarantees in order to ensure their performance of settlement obligations. If a member becomes unable or unwilling to meet its obligations, we are able to draw upon such member’s collateral in order to minimize any potential loss. We may also apply other risk control measures, such as blocking the authorization and settlement of transactions, limiting the use of certain types of agents, prohibiting initiation of acquiring relationships with certain high risk merchants or suspending or terminating a membership. The exposure to settlement losses not covered by member collateral is accounted for as a settlement risk guarantee. The fair value of the settlement risk guarantee is estimated using a proprietary model. Key inputs to the model include statistically derived loss factors based on historical experience, estimated settlement exposures at period end and a standardized grading process for members and country exposures.

Payment System Integrity

The integrity of our payments system is affected by fraudulent activity and other illegal uses of our products. Fraud is most often committed in connection with lost, stolen or counterfeit cards or stolen account information resulting from security breaches of systems that store cardholder or account data, including systems operated by merchants, financial institutions and other third-party data processors. Fraud is also more likely to occur in association with transactions where the card is not present at the point of sale, such as electronic commerce, mail order and telephone order transactions. Security and cardholder authentication for these remote channels are particularly critical issues facing our members and merchants that engage in these forms of commerce, where a signed cardholder sales receipt is generally unavailable.

Our fraud detection and prevention offerings include Verified by Visa, a global Internet authentication product, which permits cardholders to authenticate themselves to their issuing financial institution using a unique personal code; Visa Advanced Authorization, which adds additional fraud detection capability by adding real-time risk scores to authorization messages; and chip and pin programs that have been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of certain types of fraud at physical point of sale locations. We have also implemented rules that require the use of more secure PIN encryption standards for ATMs and point-of-sale PIN entry devices installed after 2002 and 2003, and we have recently mandated that all PINs transmitted through VisaNet to the issuer be encrypted by the Triple DES, or Data Encryption Standard by July 1, 2010.

We also operate several merchant compliance programs to help ensure the integrity of our payments system. In a cooperative industry effort, we co-founded the Payment Card Industry, or PCI, Data Security Standards Council in 2006, an independent council that is chartered with leading and managing the evolution of data security standards for the payments industry. In December 2006, we announced that in the United States we would offer $20 million in financial incentives and create new sanctions in an effort to further merchant compliance with this industry standard. The new effort, called the Visa PCI Compliance Acceleration Program, targets the acquirers responsible for the largest 1,200 merchants in the United States—known as Level 1 and 2

146

merchants—which each process more than one million Visa transactions a year. These merchants accounted for approximately two-thirds of Visa’s U.S. transaction volume in calendar year 2006. The initiative’s goal is to eradicate the storage of full-track data—all of the data on the magnetic stripe on a payment card, including account number, issuer and, often, the name of the cardholder, CVV2 data—the 3 digit code on the back of the card and PIN data and improve PCI compliance among this group of merchants.

In 2006, we began upgrading all connections to VisaNet with encryption capabilities to protect data that is transferred to and from VisaNet, and began performing data content analysis to ensure proper data safe-keeping and purging of obsolete data. In 2006, we also began developing a web-based tool that will replace our legacy risk-identification system to better assist members in their identification and monitoring of high-risk relationships.

Interchange

Interchange represents the transfer of value between the financial institutions participating in an open-loop payments network such as ours. On purchase transactions, interchange passes from acquirers to issuers reflecting the costs issuers bear and the value they provide to the Visa system with respect to bringing cardholders into the Visa system, guaranteeing payments, servicing accounts and performing other activities that support cardholder spending. In ATM transactions, the situation is typically reversed and interchange fees pass from issuers to acquirers to offset the acquirers’ costs of ATM deployment and the value they provide in establishing ATM networks of attractive geographic scale and functionality. We establish default interchange rates, although our customers may choose to establish different bilateral or multilateral interchange rates. Although we administer the collection and remittance of interchange fees through the settlement process, we generally do not receive any portion of the interchange fees.

We believe the default interchange rates we use promote the efficient operation of our payments network by enabling both the issuer and acquirer to understand the economics of a given transaction before entering into it, and by eliminating the need for each of our customers to negotiate transfer pricing with each other. By establishing and modifying default interchange rates in response to marketplace conditions and strategic demands, we seek to ensure a competitive value proposition for transactions using our cards in order to encourage electronic transactions and to maximize participation in the Visa payments system by issuers and acquirers and, ultimately, consumers and merchants. Proper management of interchange rates benefits consumers, merchants, our customers and us by promoting the overall growth of our payments network in competition with other payment card systems and other forms of payment, and creating incentives for innovation, enhanced data quality and security.

Interchange rates, including our default interchange rates, have become subject to increased regulatory scrutiny in recent years. In certain countries, such as Australia and Mexico, interchange rates have been adjusted in advance of, or in response to, government regulation. We are currently devoting substantial management and financial resources to explain the importance of and defend interchange fees and other legal and regulatory challenges we face relating to interchange fees. See “—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Global Interchange Proceedings” and “Risk Factors—Interchange fees are subject to significant legal and regulatory scrutiny worldwide, which may have a material adverse impact on our revenue, our prospects for future growth and our overall business.”

Merchant Discount Rates. Acquirers generally charge merchants a fee for each transaction, called the “merchant discount.” Acquirers charge a merchant discount, which would typically cover costs they incur for participation in four-party payments networks, including those relating to interchange, and compensate them for various other services they provide to merchants. Merchant discount rates and other merchant fees are set by our acquirers without our involvement and by agreement with their merchant customers and are established in competition with other acquirers, other payment card systems and other forms of payment. We do not establish or regulate merchant discount rates or any other fees charged by our acquirers.

147

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws in the United States and other jurisdictions, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to protect our proprietary technology.

We own a number of valuable trademarks and designs, which are essential to our business, including Visa, Interlink, PLUS, Visa Electron, the “Winged V” design, the “Dove” design and the “Bands Design—Blue, White & Gold” design. We also own numerous other valuable trademarks and designs covering various brands, programs and services we offer to support our payment programs and related services. Through agreements with our customers, we authorize and monitor the use of our trademarks in connection with participation in our payments network.

In addition, we own a number of patents and patent applications relating to payments solutions, transaction processing, security systems and other matters.

Competition

We compete in the global payment marketplace against all forms of payment, including paper-based forms (principally cash and checks) card-based payments—credit cards, charge cards, deferred debit, debit cards, including ATM cards, prepaid cards, private label cards and other types of general-purpose and limited-use cards and other electronic payments—wire transfers, electronic benefits transfers, Automated Clearing House payments, electronic data interchange, and other forms of electronic payment not typically tied to a payment card or similar access device.

Within the general purpose payment card industry, we face substantial and intense competition worldwide. The leading global card brands in the general purpose payment card industry include Visa, MasterCard, American Express and Diners Club. Other general purpose card brands are more concentrated in specific geographic regions, such as JCB in Asia and Discover in the United States. In certain countries, our competitors have leading positions, such as JCB in Japan and China Union Pay in China, which is the sole domestic payment processor and operates the sole domestic acceptance mark in China due to local regulation. We also compete against private-label cards, which can generally be used to make purchases solely at the sponsoring retail store, gasoline retailer or other merchant.

In the debit card market segment, Visa and MasterCard are the primary global brands. In addition, our Interlink and Visa Electron brands compete with Maestro, owned by MasterCard and various regional and country-specific debit network brands, such as STAR, owned by First Data, PULSE, owned by Discover, NYCE, owned by Metavante, and others in the United States; Interac in Canada; and EFTPOS in Australia. In addition to our PLUS brand, the primary cash access card brands are Cirrus, owned by MasterCard, and many of the online debit network brands referenced above. In many countries, local debit brands are the primary brands, and our brands are used primarily to enable cross-border transactions, which typically constitute a small portion of overall transaction volume.

Some of our major competitors, including American Express and Discover, operate closed-loop systems. Closed-loop systems can benefit from direct access to consumer and merchant information, and they tend to have greater control over cardholder service than do operators of open-loop payments networks, like Visa, which depend on their financial institution customers to provide products and services directly to the cardholder. In recent years, the major closed-loop systems, American Express and Discover, have begun working directly with issuing and acquiring financial institutions, thus emulating certain aspects of the open loop system, including setting transfer pricing.

In addition, we compete against companies that are developing and implementing alternative payments networks. Among other things, these competitors provide Internet currencies that can be used to buy and sell

148

goods online, virtual checking programs that permit the direct debit of consumer checking accounts for both online and point-of-sale transactions and services that support payments to and from proprietary accounts for Internet, mobile commerce and other applications. A number of these new entrants rely principally on the Internet to support their services, and may enjoy lower costs than we do. In mobile commerce, we also face competition from established network operators who may be in a position to enable mobile devices to process electronic payments or transfer money, and to use their existing billing systems to process these payments and transfers between their customers and third parties without our involvement.

Our Visa Debit Processing Service is a major provider of issuer processing services for United States issuers of Visa debit, prepaid and ATM products, and thus also competes with third party processors, such as First Data Corporation and Total System Services.

We believe that the primary factors affecting our competitive position in the payments industry include:

• our ability to maintain the quality and integrity of our transaction processing systems;

• our relationships with our customers;

• our relationships with merchants;

• the impact of existing litigation, legislation and government regulation;

• pricing to our customers;

• the impact of globalization and consolidation of financial institutions and merchants; and

• our ability to develop and implement new payment programs, systems and technologies.

Litigation has and may continue to affect our ability to compete in the global payments industry. For example, as a result of the June 2003 settlement of a U.S. merchant lawsuit against Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard, merchants may choose not to accept U.S.-issued Visa debit cards in the United States while still accepting Visa-branded credit cards, and vice versa. In addition, following the final judgment in our DOJ litigation, members of Visa U.S.A. may issue certain payment cards that compete with Visa-branded cards, such as American Express or Discover, while remaining Visa members. Since this final judgment, several members of Visa U.S.A., including, but not limited to, Bank of America, Citibank, HSBC/Metris, U.S.A.A., Barclaycard U.S., GE Consumer Finance, First Bank & Trust, Credit One, Central National Bank & Trust, and Brenham National Bank, have begun to issue, or have announced that they will issue, American Express or Discover-branded cards. Outside of the U.S., our customers have historically been permitted to issue American Express cards, as well as the cards of other competing general purpose card networks.

The banking industry has undergone consolidation, and we expect this trend to continue. A customer financial institution with a substantial part of our portfolio may be acquired by an institution that has a strong relationship with a competitor, resulting in a substantial loss of business. Because continued consolidation in the banking industry results in fewer financial institutions of increased size, the bargaining power of the remaining financial institutions increases.

Government Regulation

Government regulation impacts key aspects of our business. We are subject to government regulation of the payments industry in the many countries in which our cards are used. Our customers are also subject to numerous regulations applicable to banks and other financial institutions in the United States and elsewhere, and as a consequence our business is affected by such regulations. In recent years our business has come under increasing regulatory scrutiny. In particular, interchange fees associated with open loop payments systems such as ours are being reviewed or challenged in various jurisdictions in which our cards are used.

149

As the volume of card-based payments has grown rapidly in recent years, interchange fees, including our default interchange rates, have become subject to increased regulatory scrutiny worldwide. We believe that regulators are increasingly adopting a similar approach to interchange fees and, as a result, developments in any one jurisdiction may influence regulators in other jurisdictions. Interchange fees and related practices are being or have been reviewed by regulatory authorities and/or central banks in a number of jurisdictions, including the United States, the European Union, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Hungary, Mexico, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. In certain countries, such as Australia and Mexico, interchange rates have been adjusted in anticipation of, or in response to, government regulation. Interchange fees have been the topic of recent committee hearings in the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. Individual state legislatures in the United States are also reviewing interchange fees, and legislators in a number of states have proposed bills that purport to limit interchange fees or merchant discount rates or to prohibit interchange fees or merchant discount rates from being applied to portions of a transaction. The topic of interchange fees has also been raised in conferences held by a number of Federal Reserve Banks. In addition, the Merchants Payment Coalition, a coalition of trade associations representing businesses that accept credit and debit cards, is mounting a challenge to interchange fees in the United States by seeking legislative and regulatory intervention.

Most jurisdictions in which our customers and we operate have implemented, amended or have pending anti-money laundering regulations. In 2002, we and our customers became subject to the provisions of the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act, which requires the creation and implementation of comprehensive anti-money laundering programs. Our anti-money laundering program must be reasonably designed to prevent our payments system from being used to facilitate money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities. Our program must, at a minimum, include the designation of a compliance officer; provide for the training of employees regarding anti-money laundering responsibilities; provide internal policies, procedures and controls to mitigate money laundering risks; and be independently audited.

Visa International and Visa U.S.A. are subject to regulations imposed by the OFAC. OFAC restricts financial dealings with Cuba, Iran, Myanmar and Sudan, as well as financial dealings with certain third parties, such as identified money laundering fronts for terrorists or narcotics traffickers. While Visa prohibits financial institutions that are domiciled in those countries or are restricted parties from being Visa members, many Visa International members are non-U.S. financial institutions, and thus are not subject to OFAC restrictions. Accordingly, our payments network may be used with respect to transactions in or involving countries or parties subject to OFAC-administered sanctions.

In recent years, a number of regulations relating to the price of credit have been implemented in some jurisdictions in which our cards are used. In the United States, regulators and the U.S. Congress have increased their scrutiny of our customers’ pricing and underwriting standards relating to credit. For example, a number of regulations have been issued to implement the U.S. Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, and other regulations are expected to be issued in 2007. One such regulation pertaining to risk-based pricing could have a significant impact on the application process for credit cards and result in increased costs of issuance and/or a decrease in the flexibility of card issuers to set the price of credit. In addition, the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations is expected to consider the methods used to calculate finance charges and allocate payments received from cardholders and the methods by which default interest rates, late fees and over-the-credit-limit fees are determined, imposed and disclosed. Any regulation in this regard could impact our customers’ ability to issue profitably cards in certain segments and impact our payments volume and revenue.

Our customers and we are subject to regulations related to privacy, data use and security in the jurisdictions in which we do business. For example, in the United States, our customers and we are respectively subject to the banking regulators’ information safeguard rules and the Federal Trade Commission’s rules under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. These rules require that our customers and we develop, implement and maintain a written, comprehensive information security program containing safeguards that are appropriate to our size and complexity, the nature and scope of our activities and the sensitivity of any customer information at issue.

150

In recent years, there has been a heightened legislative and regulatory focus on data security, including requiring consumer notification in the event of a data breach. In the United States, a number of bills have been introduced in Congress and there have been several Congressional hearings to address these issues. Congress is considering data security/data breach legislation which, if implemented, could affect our customers and us. In addition, a number of U.S. states have enacted security breach legislation, requiring varying levels of consumer notification in the event of a security breach, and several other states are considering similar legislation.

Governments in certain countries have acted, or could act, to provide resources or protection to selected national payment card providers or national payment processing providers to support domestic competitors or to displace us from, prevent us from entering into, or substantially restrict us from participating in, particular geographic markets. For example, our customers in China are not permitted to issue cards carrying our brands for domestic use in China. Governments in certain countries that were formerly part of the Soviet Union have considered similar restrictions from time to time.

Many jurisdictions in which our customers and we operate are considering, or are expected to consider, legislation with regard to Internet transactions, and in particular with regard to choice of law, the legality of certain e-commerce transactions, the collection of applicable taxes and copyright and trademark infringement. If implemented, these initiatives could require our customers and us to monitor, filter, restrict or otherwise oversee various categories of payment card transactions or to take other actions. For example, we expect regulations to be promulgated in 2007 pursuant to recently enacted U.S. legislation regarding Internet gambling, which will require our customers and us to code and block certain types of Internet gambling transactions. Various U.S. regulatory agencies are also considering additional regulation covering capital requirements, privacy, disclosure rules, security and marketing, which could impact our customers and us directly. Increases in fraud or other illegal activity involving our cards could also lead to regulatory intervention, such as mandatory card re-issuance.

Certain of our operations in the United States are periodically reviewed by the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council to ensure our compliance with applicable data integrity and security requirements. In recent years, the federal banking regulators in the United States have adopted a series of regulatory measures intended to require more conservative accounting, greater risk management and higher capital requirements for bank credit card activities, particularly in the case of banks that focus on subprime cardholders. Government regulators may determine that we are a systemically important payments system and impose settlement risk management requirements on us, including new settlement procedures or other operational rules to address credit and operational risks or new criteria for customer participation and merchant access to our payments system. In addition, outside of the United States, a number of jurisdictions have implemented legal frameworks to regulate their domestic payments systems. For example, regulators in Australia, Mexico, Colombia, Singapore, and Malaysia have been given statutory authority to regulate certain aspects of the payments systems in those countries.

Properties

As of December 31, 2006, we owned and leased approximately 2.1 million square feet of office and processing center space in 30 countries around the world, of which approximately 1.4 million square feet is owned and the remaining 700,000 square feet is leased. Our corporate headquarters is located in the San Francisco Bay Area and consists of four buildings that we own, totaling 940,000 square feet. We also own a 168,000 square foot office building in Miami, which serves as our Latin America regional headquarters.

In addition, we operate three processing centers: a processing center and an office facility in Colorado totaling 268,000 square feet, which we own, a processing center and office facility in Virginia, totaling 137,500 square feet, which we lease, and an 11,000-square-foot leased facility in Japan. In July 2006, we approved a plan to replace our leased processing center in the eastern United States by building a new 140,000 square foot processing center and a new 113,000-square-foot office building.

These facilities are believed to be suitable and adequate to support our business needs.

151

Employees

As of December 31, 2006, Visa International, Visa U.S.A., its majority controlled subsidiary Inovant, and Visa Canada had 5,612 employees worldwide. We consider our relationships with our employees to be good.

Customers

As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately 15,800 customer financial institutions. Operating revenues recognized as a result of fees paid, net of incentives, from our largest customer, JPMorgan Chase and its affiliates, were approximately $408.5 million in fiscal 2006 and $254.2 million in the six months ended March 31, 2007, or 11% and 11%, respectively, of Visa Inc.’s pro forma operating revenue. No other customer represented more than 10% of pro forma operating revenue.

Legal and Regulatory Proceedings

We are a party to legal and regulatory proceedings with respect to a variety of matters in the ordinary course of business. Some of these proceedings involve complex claims that are subject to substantial uncertainties and unspecified damages, therefore, the probability of loss and an estimation of damages are not possible to ascertain at present. Accordingly, we have not established reserves for any of these proceedings other than for the Currency Conversion Litigation and the GMRI, Inc. case, see “—Currency Conversion Litigation” and “—U.S. Merchant Opt-Out and Consumer Litigations.” Except for those matters described below, we do not believe that any legal or regulatory proceedings to which we are a party would have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. Although we believe that we have strong defenses for the litigations and regulatory proceedings described below, we could in the future incur judgments or fines or enter into settlements of claims that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Notwithstanding our belief, in the event we may be found liable in a large class-action lawsuit or on the basis of a claim entitling the plaintiff to treble damages or under which we were jointly and severally liable, charges we may be required to record could be significant and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition, or, in certain circumstances, even cause us to become insolvent, and result in a significant reduction in the value, or the complete loss, of your investment. Moreover, an adverse outcome in a regulatory proceeding could lead to the filing of civil damage claims and possibly result in damage awards in amounts that could be significant and could materially and adversely affect our results of operation, cash flow and financial condition or lead to the other results set forth above. For a discussion of certain risks related to legal and regulatory matters, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Legal and Regulatory Risks.”

U.S. Merchant Opt-Out and Consumer Litigations

Commencing in October 1996, several class action suits were brought by a number of U.S. merchants against Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard challenging certain aspects of the payment card industry under U.S. federal antitrust law. Those suits were later consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation. The plaintiffs claimed that Visa U.S.A.’s “Honor All Cards” rule, which required merchants who accepted Visa cards to accept for payment every validly presented Visa card, and a similar MasterCard rule, constituted an illegal tying arrangement in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The plaintiffs claimed that Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard unlawfully tied acceptance of debit cards to acceptance of credit cards. The plaintiffs also claimed that Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard conspired to monopolize what the plaintiffs characterized as the alleged point-of-sale debit card market, thereby suppressing the growth of regional networks such as ATM payments systems. On June 4, 2003, Visa U.S.A. signed a settlement agreement to settle the claims brought by the plaintiffs in this matter, which the court approved on December 19, 2003. For a description of the settlement agreement, see Note 18 to our interim consolidated financial statements included herein. A number of class members appealed the District Court’s approval of the settlement. These appeals

152

largely focused on the court’s attorneys’ fees award as well on the court’s ruling on the scope of the release set forth in the settlement agreement. On January 4, 2005, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order affirming the District Court’s approval of the settlement agreement. A petition for certiorari by two objectors was denied by the United States Supreme Court on May 16, 2005. Accordingly, the settlement is now final.

Several lawsuits were commenced by merchants who opted not to participate in the plaintiff class in In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation, including Best Buy Stores, CVS, Giant Eagle, Home Depot, Toys “R” Us and GMRI, Inc. The majority of these cases were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Visa U.S.A. has entered into separate settlement agreements with all but one of these plaintiffs resolving their claims, and the District Court has entered orders dismissing with prejudice each of those plaintiffs’ complaints against Visa U.S.A. Only the action brought by GMRI, Inc. against Visa U.S.A. remains pending. On May 14, 2007, the plaintiff in the GMRI, Inc. case sought to amend its complaint and consolidate the case with Multidistrict Litigation 1720. See “—Covered Litigation—Interchange Litigation.” Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and several of their member banks named as defendants in Multidistrict Litigation 1720 opposed the plaintiff’s motion. On June 1, 2007, the plaintiff withdrew its request.

In addition, individual or multiple complaints have been brought in nineteen different states and the District of Columbia alleging state antitrust, consumer protection and common law claims against Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard (and, in one state, against Visa International) on behalf of putative classes of consumers. The claims in these actions largely mirror the allegations made in the U.S. merchant lawsuit and assert that merchants, faced with excessive merchant discount fees, have passed on some portion those fees to consumers in the form of higher prices on goods and services sold. Visa U.S.A. has been successful in the majority of these cases as courts have granted Visa U.S.A.’s motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim or plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed their complaints. Specifically, courts in Arizona, the District of Columbia, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont and Wisconsin have granted Visa U.S.A.’s motions and dismissed the complaints. Plaintiffs have an outstanding appeal of the dismissal in Iowa. In addition, there are outstanding cases in California, the District of Columbia and New Mexico. The parties are awaiting decisions on Visa U.S.A.’s motions to dismiss in New Mexico and the District of Columbia. In California, the court granted Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s demurrer, or motion to dismiss, with respect to claims brought under the Cartwright Act, but denied a similar motion with respect to Unfair Competition Law claims for unlawful, unfair, and/or fraudulent business practices. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International subsequently filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings seeking dismissal of those latter claims in light of the Proposition 64 amendments to the Unfair Competition Law. After oral argument, the court denied this motion on March 6, 2007. The California Court of Appeal rejected a petition seeking immediate review of that decision on June 7, 2007. In West Virginia, the action was brought against Visa U.S.A. by West Virginia’s attorney general as parens patriae for West Virginia consumers. The court denied Visa U.S.A.’s motion for summary judgment on October 14, 2005. On February 14, 2006, Visa U.S.A. answered the West Virginia complaint and the parties began discovery. On April 10, 2007, the court issued a stay of discovery pending its ruling on an antitrust standing issue. On April 27, 2007, Visa U.S.A. and the State of West Virginia reached an agreement in principle to settle all claims against Visa U.S.A. A provision was recorded in Visa U.S.A.’s consolidated statement of operations in connection with this settlement.

On February 17, 2005, plaintiffs filed a complaint in Ohio state court on behalf of a putative class of consumers asserting claims under Ohio state antitrust and common laws. The claims in that action mirror those in the consumer actions described above but also name as co-defendants a purported class of merchants that were class members in In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation. Plaintiffs allege that Visa U.S.A., MasterCard and the class members in the U.S. merchant lawsuit conspired to attempt to monopolize an alleged debit card market by tying debit card acceptance to credit card acceptance. On October 7, 2005, plaintiffs filed a voluntary notice of dismissal of the Ohio complaint. Two similar actions also were filed in Tennessee state and federal court on February 17, 2005, but Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard were not named as defendants in those actions. The Tennessee state court action was refiled in federal court and both actions were transferred to the federal court for the Eastern District of New York on September 29, 2006, where they are proceeding.

153

In 2003, Visa U.S.A. established a litigation provision for the GMRI, Inc. case based on a calculation of what GMRI, Inc. would have received under the settlement of In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation if GMRI, Inc. had not opted out of that settlement.

Department of Justice Antitrust Case and Related Litigation

In October 1998, the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, filed suit against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and MasterCard in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that both Visa U.S.A.’s and MasterCard’s governance structures and policies violated U.S. federal antitrust laws. First, the DOJ claimed that “dual governance”—the situation where an employee of a member financial institution also serves on the board of directors of Visa U.S.A. or MasterCard while a portion of its card portfolio is issued under the brand of the other association—was anti-competitive and acted to limit innovation within the payment card industry. Second, the DOJ challenged Visa U.S.A.’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s Competitive Programs Policy, or CPP, which prohibited financial institutions participating in the respective associations from issuing competing proprietary payment cards, such as American Express or Discover. The DOJ alleged that Visa U.S.A.’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s CPP acted to restrain competition.

On October 9, 2001, the District Court issued an opinion upholding the legality and pro-competitive nature of dual governance. However, the court also held that Visa U.S.A.’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s CPP constituted unlawful restraints of trade under the federal antitrust laws.

On November 26, 2001, the court issued a final judgment that ordered Visa U.S.A. to repeal bylaw 2.10(e) and enjoined Visa U.S.A. and Visa International from enacting or enforcing any bylaw, rule, policy or practice that prohibits its issuers from issuing general purpose credit or debit cards in the United States on any other general purpose card network. The final judgment also provided that from the effective date of the final judgment (October 15, 2004) until October 15, 2006, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International were required to permit any issuer with which they had entered into an agreement prior to the effective date of the final judgment, pursuant to which agreement the issuer committed to maintain a certain percentage of its general purpose card volume, new card issuance, or total number of cards in force in the United States on the Visa network, to terminate that agreement without penalty, provided that the reason for the termination was to permit the issuer to enter into an agreement with American Express or Discover. The final judgment imposed parallel requirements on MasterCard.

Visa U.S.A. and Visa International appealed the judge’s ruling with respect to bylaw 2.10(e). On September 17, 2003, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit issued its decision upholding the District Court’s decision. On October 4, 2004, the Supreme Court denied Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s petition for certiorari, thereby exhausting all avenues for further appeal in this case. The final judgment became effective by court order on October 15, 2004.

Discover and American Express have each filed suit against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging, among other things, that Visa bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s CPP caused them injury under the U.S. federal antitrust laws. In connection with their respective claims, American Express and Discover have each requested that the District Court give collateral estoppel effect to the District Court’s findings in the judgment of the 1998 DOJ litigation. For a discussion of the Discover and American Express litigations, see “—Covered Litigation—The Discover Litigation” and “—Covered Litigation—The American Express Litigation.”

On January 10, 2005, MasterCard filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in connection with the DOJ litigation, renewing an earlier challenge to a Visa U.S.A. bylaw that provides for a settlement service fee. To ensure payment of Visa U.S.A.’s settlement obligation in the In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation case, see “—U.S. Merchant Opt-Out and Consumer Litigation,” Visa U.S.A.

154

adopted the settlement service fee in June 2003. The bylaw provides that the settlement service fee is to be paid by certain Visa U.S.A. members that shift a substantial portion of their offline debit volume to another debit brand unless that shift is to the American Express or Discover brands. MasterCard contended that the settlement service fee violates the final judgment in the DOJ litigation by effectively prohibiting Visa U.S.A. members from issuing MasterCard debit cards.

On August 18, 2005, the court issued an order appointing a special master to hear evidence regarding MasterCard’s challenge. An evidentiary hearing before the Special Master occurred in December 2005. The parties completed their post-hearing briefing to the Special Master in February 2006. In July 2006, the Special Master submitted his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to the court, in which he concluded that Visa U.S.A. did not violate the final judgment in the DOJ action before October 15, 2004—the effective date of the Final Judgment—but that Visa U.S.A. did violate the final judgment by continuing to enforce the settlement service fee after October 15, 2004. The parties completed three rounds of briefing to the court in August 2006. In this briefing, Visa U.S.A. filed objections to the Special Master’s report and MasterCard asked the court to adopt the Special Master’s findings and conclusions. The court heard oral argument with respect to the proper scope of any remedy on April 23, 2007.

On June 7, 2007, the court issued an Opinion and Order holding that the settlement service fee violated the final judgment in the DOJ case as of October 15, 2004. On June 15, 2007, the court issued an Amended Opinion and Order, clarifying the remedy in the ruling. First, the court ordered Visa U.S.A. to repeal the settlement service fee bylaw. Second, the court gave any Visa U.S.A. debit issuer subject to the settlement service fee prior to its repeal who entered into an agreement that includes offline debit issuance with Visa U.S.A. on or after June 20, 2003 the right to terminate its agreement, provided that the issuer has entered into an agreement to issue MasterCard branded debit cards and the issuer repays to Visa U.S.A. any unearned benefits or financial incentives under its Visa U.S.A. agreement. Visa U.S.A. is analyzing the implications of the ruling for Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard and assessing next steps, including a possible appeal by Visa U.S.A. of the court’s ruling. On June 13, 2007, the parties entered into an agreement to toll the statute of limitations on certain potential claims MasterCard may have against Visa U.S.A. in connection with the settlement service fee.

Global Interchange Proceedings

Interchange represents the transfer of value between the financial institutions participating in an open-loop payments network such as ours. On purchase transactions, interchange passes from acquirers to issuers, reflecting the costs issuers bear and the value they provide to the Visa system by bringing cardholders into the Visa system, guaranteeing payments, servicing accounts and performing other activities that support cardholder spending. In ATM transactions, the situation is typically reversed and interchange fees pass from issuers to acquirers to offset the acquirers’ costs of ATM deployment and the value they provide in establishing ATM networks of attractive geographic scale and functionality. We establish default interchange rates, and our customers may choose to establish different rates for transactions among themselves. Although we administer the collection and remittance of interchange fees through the settlement process, we generally do not receive any portion of the interchange fees. As described more fully below, our interchange rates and those of our customers are subject to regulatory or legal review and/or challenges in a number of jurisdictions. The increasing legal and regulatory scrutiny of interchange fees worldwide may have a material adverse impact on our revenue, our prospects for future growth and our overall business. For a description of certain risks relating to interchange fees, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Legal and Regulatory Risks.”

United States. Approximately fifty class action and individual complaints have been filed on behalf of merchants against Visa U.S.A., Visa International and certain Visa U.S.A. member financial institutions alleging that their setting of interchange rates violates federal and state antitrust laws, among other antitrust allegations. The lawsuits have been transferred to a multidistrict litigation in the Eastern District of New York. For a discussion of these legal proceedings, see “—Covered Litigation—Interchange Litigation.”

155

New Zealand. The Commerce Commission, New Zealand’s competition regulator, filed a civil Statement of Claim in the High Court in Wellington on November 9, 2006, alleging that, among other things, the fixing of default interchange rates by Cards NZ Limited, Visa International, MasterCard, and certain Visa International member banks contravenes the New Zealand Commerce Act. On November 27, 2006, a group of New Zealand retailers filed a nearly identical claim against the same parties before the same tribunal. Both the Commerce Commission and the retailers seek declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief. On March 2, 2007, Visa International filed statements of defense in both cases, denying liability for any cause of action. Both cases were transferred to the commercial list at the High Court in Auckland in April 2007, where the court is expected to set a timetable for further proceedings.

European Union. On September 29, 2000, the European Commission issued a “statement of objections” challenging Visa International’s cross-border EU default interchange rates under European Community competition rules. On July 24, 2002, the European Commission announced its decision to exempt Visa International’s default EU intra-regional/cross-border interchange rates from these rules based on certain changes to those rates proposed by Visa Europe. Among other things, in connection with the exemption decision, Visa Europe agreed to set a cap on these default interchange rates using a benchmark cost-based methodology that considers certain issuer costs. Visa Europe also agreed to reduce its default interchange rates for debit and credit transactions to amounts at or below certain specified levels. This exemption expires on December 31, 2007.

On June 13, 2005, the European Commission announced a sector inquiry into the financial services industry, which includes an examination of a number of aspects of payment systems, including interchange fees. On January 31, 2007, the European Commission released its final report on its sector inquiry into the payment card industry. In the report, the European Commission expresses concern about a large number of practices, including interchange fees and payment system rules, of a multiplicity of industry participants, and warns of possible regulatory proceedings or legislative action to address the concerns identified. However, the report does not indicate against whom any such regulatory action might be taken or what legislative changes might be sought.

United Kingdom Office of Fair Trading. On October 19, 2005, the Office of Fair Trading of the United Kingdom, or the OFT, issued a statement of objections against Visa International, Visa Europe, Visa UK and certain member banks challenging the default interchange rates applicable to consumer credit card, charge card and deferred debit card transactions in the U.K. The statement of objections set out the OFT’s view that the default interchange fee may infringe the U.K.’s Competition Act and Article 81 of the E.C. Treaty. In June 2006, the statement of objections was withdrawn. The OFT has begun a new investigation into the Visa entities’ U.K. domestic default interchange rates, among other things, although no formal proceedings have been initiated.

Other Jurisdictions. We are aware that regulatory authorities and/or central banks in certain other jurisdictions, including Brazil and Colombia, are reviewing Visa International’s and/or its members’ interchange fees and/or related practices and may seek to regulate the establishment of such fees and/or such practices.

Covered Litigation

Visa U.S.A. and Visa International are parties to certain legal proceedings discussed below that are subject to the retrospective responsibility plan, which we refer to as the covered litigation. The retrospective responsibility plan determines how and to what extent certain members of Visa U.S.A. will assume responsibility for potential liability under the covered litigation. For a description of the retrospective responsibility plan, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring—The Retrospective Responsibility Plan.”

The Discover Litigation

On October 4, 2004, Discover Financial Services, Inc. filed a complaint against Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and was designated as a related case to the DOJ litigation, and was assigned to the same judge who issued

156

the DOJ decision described above. See “—Department of Justice Antitrust Litigation and Related Litigation.” The complaint alleges that the implementation and enforcement of Visa’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s CPP, as well as Visa’s “Honor All Cards” rule–which require merchants who accept Visa cards to accept for payment every validly presented Visa card–and a similar MasterCard rule violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act as well as California’s Unfair Competition Act in an alleged market for general purpose card network services and an alleged market for debit card network services. The complaint also challenges Visa’s no surcharge rule, and a similar MasterCard rule, under the same statutes. On December 10, 2004, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International moved to dismiss the complaint in its entirety for failure to state a claim. In lieu of filing its opposition papers to this motion, Discover filed an amended complaint on January 7, 2005. In the amended complaint, Discover dropped some of its claims, including its challenge against the no surcharge rule and its claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law, but continued to allege that the implementation and enforcement of Visa U.S.A.’s bylaw 2.10(e), MasterCard’s CPP, and the Honor All Cards rule violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. On June 7, 2007, Discover filed a Second Amended Complaint, which eliminated allegations related to the “Honor All Cards” rule, dropped attempted monopolization and monopolization claims against MasterCard and Visa International to conform to the court’s rulings on motions to dismiss, and made technical change to names of the plaintiffs.

Specifically, Discover claimed that Visa U.S.A.’s bylaw 2.10(e) unreasonably restrained trade by prohibiting financial institutions that were members of Visa U.S.A. from issuing payment cards on the Discover network in the United States. Discover requested that the District Court apply collateral estoppel with respect to the court’s final judgment in the DOJ litigation and enter an order that bylaw 2.10(e) and the CPP have injured competition and caused injury to Discover. Discover seeks treble damages in an amount to be proved at trial, along with attorneys’ fees and costs. On February 7, 2005, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International moved to dismiss Discover’s amended complaint in its entirety for failure to state a claim. On April 14, 2005, the District Court denied, at this stage in the litigation, Discover’s request to give collateral estoppel effect to the findings in the DOJ litigation. However, the District Court indicated that Discover may refile a motion for collateral estoppel after discovery. Under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, a court has the discretion to preclude one or more issues from being relitigated in a subsequent action if: (1) the same issues were actually litigated and determined in the prior action; (2) proof of those issues was necessary to reach the prior judgment; and (3) the party to be estopped had a full and fair opportunity to litigate those issues in the prior action. Accordingly, if the District Court were to give effect to collateral estoppel on one or more issues in the future, then significant elements of plaintiff’s claims would be established, thereby making it more likely that Visa U.S.A. and Visa International would be found liable and making the possibility of an award of damages more likely. In the event all issues are subsequently decided against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in dispositive motions during the course of the litigation, then there is the possibility that the sole issue remaining will be whether a damage award is appropriate and, if so, what the amount of damages should be.

Also on April 14, 2005, and in subsequent rulings, with respect to the alleged market for general purpose card network services, the District Court denied Visa U.S.A.’s motion to dismiss Discover’s Section 1 conspiracy to restrain trade claims and Section 2 monopolization, attempted monopolization and conspiracy to monopolize claims that were based upon the conduct described above. On October 24, 2005, the court granted Visa International’s motion to dismiss Discover’s attempted monopolization and monopolization claims against it, because plaintiffs did not allege that Visa International individually had sufficient market share to maintain these claims. On November 9, 2005, the court denied Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s motion to dismiss Discover’s claims based upon effects in an alleged debit market. On November 30, 2005, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International answered the amended complaint. On February 1, 2006, the District Court issued a case management order establishing a discovery schedule for this action, which ordered that fact discovery shall be completed by February 1, 2007. Subsequently the District Court extended the completion of fact discovery to May 31, 2007. At a hearing on April 25, 2007, the District Court set a trial date of September 9, 2008 for both the Discover Litigation and the American Express Litigation. The court also established deadlines and procedures for motions practice and expert discovery.

157

The American Express Litigation

On November 15, 2004, American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. filed a complaint against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard and eight Visa U.S.A. and Visa International member financial institutions (JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Capital One Financial Corp., U.S. Bancorp, Household International Inc., Wells Fargo & Co., Providian Financial Corp., and U.S.A.A. Federal Savings Bank). Subsequently, U.S.A.A. Federal Savings Bank, Bank of America Corp., and Household International Inc. announced settlements with American Express and were dismissed from the case. The complaint, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, was designated as a related case to the DOJ litigation and was assigned to the same judge. See “—Department of Justice Antitrust Case and Related Litigation.” The complaint alleges that the implementation and enforcement of Visa U.S.A.’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s CPP violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act in an alleged market for general purpose card network services and an alleged market for debit card network services. Specifically, American Express claimed that bylaw 2.10(e) and the CPP unreasonably restrained trade by prohibiting financial institutions that were members of Visa U.S.A. and/or MasterCard from issuing payment cards on the American Express network. American Express also alleges that Visa U.S.A.’s and MasterCard’s issuing contracts with its members constitute exclusive dealing agreements that violate the Sherman Act and/or that the defendants conspired to enter into those agreements to foreclose American Express from the market. American Express alleges that Visa, MasterCard and their members conspired with one another to bring about these alleged antitrust violations and are jointly and severally liable for the alleged violations. American Express seeks treble damages in an amount to be proved at trial, along with attorneys’ fees and costs.

On January 14, 2005, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. American Express requested that the court apply collateral estoppel with respect to its final judgment in the DOJ litigation. On April 14, 2005, the District Court denied, at this stage in the litigation, American Express’ request to give collateral estoppel effect to the findings in the DOJ litigation. However, the court indicated that American Express may refile a motion for collateral estoppel after discovery. As with the lawsuit brought by Discover that is described in the preceding section, if the court were to give effect to collateral estoppel on one or more issues in the future, then elements of plaintiff’s claims would be established, thereby making it more likely that we would be found liable and making the possibility of an award of damages more likely. In the event all issues are subsequently decided against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in dispositive motions during the course of the litigation, then there is the possibility that the sole issue remaining will be whether a damage award is appropriate and, if so, what the amount of damages should be. In addition, that same day and in subsequent rulings, the court denied Visa U.S.A.’s motion to dismiss American Express’ Section 1 conspiracy to restrain trade claims and Section 2 conspiracy to monopolize claims that were based upon the conduct described above. On November 9, 2005, the court denied Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s motion to dismiss American Express’s conspiracy to restrain trade claims in the alleged market for debit card network services. On November 30, 2005, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International answered the complaint. On February 1, 2006, the court issued a case management order establishing a discovery schedule for this action, which ordered that fact discovery shall be completed by February 1, 2007. Subsequently the District Court extended the completion of fact discovery to May 31, 2007. At a hearing on April 25, 2007, the District Court set a trial date of September 9, 2008 for both the Discover Litigation and the American Express Litigation. The court also established deadlines and procedures for motions practice and expert discovery.

Attridge

On December 8, 2004, a complaint was filed in California state court on behalf of a putative class of consumers asserting claims against Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard under California’s Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Law. The claims in this action, Attridge v. Visa U.S.A. Inc., et al., seek to piggyback on the portion of the DOJ antitrust litigation in which the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that Visa’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s Competitive Programs Policy constitute unlawful restraints of trade under the federal antitrust laws. See “—Department of Justice Antitrust Case and Related Litigation.” After the plaintiff twice amended his complaint, Visa U.S.A., Visa International and

158

MasterCard demurred to (moved to dismiss) the complaint and, at a hearing on November 2, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims with leave to amend. On December 2, 2005, the plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. The defendants again demurred to (moved to dismiss) that complaint. On May 19, 2006, the court entered an order dismissing plaintiff’s Cartwright Act claims with prejudice but allowing the plaintiff to proceed with his Unfair Competition Law claims. On June 19, 2006, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International answered the third amended complaint. The parties are now moving forward with discovery.

Interchange Litigation

On October 8, 2004, a purported class action lawsuit was filed by a group of merchants in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Visa U.S.A. Inc., MasterCard, and several Visa U.S.A. member financial institutions alleging, among other things, that Visa U.S.A.’s and MasterCard’s interchange fees contravene the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act, Kendall v. Visa U.S.A. Inc., et al. The plaintiffs seek treble damages in an unspecified amount, attorneys’ fees and an injunction against Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard from setting interchange and engaging in joint marketing activities, which plaintiffs allege include the purported negotiation of merchant discount rates with certain merchants. On November 19, 2004, Visa U.S.A. filed an answer to the complaint. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on April 25, 2005. Visa U.S.A. moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim and, in the alternative, also moved for summary judgment with respect to certain of the claims. On July 25, 2005, the court issued an order granting Visa U.S.A.’s motion to dismiss and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. On August 10, 2005, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal. Plaintiffs’ opening appeal brief was filed on November 28, 2005. Visa filed its opposition brief to plaintiffs’ appeal on January 26, 2006 and plaintiffs filed their reply on February 23, 2006. The Ninth Circuit heard oral argument on the plaintiffs’ appeal on June 11, 2007. No ruling has been issued.

On May 6, 2005, a purported class action lawsuit was filed by a merchant, Animal Land Inc., against Visa U.S.A. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, alleging that Visa U.S.A.’s no-surcharge rule violates Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. Plaintiff alleges that under the no-surcharge rule, merchants are not permitted to pass along to cardholders a discrete surcharge to account for the fees that the merchant pays in connection with Visa-branded payment card transactions. Plaintiff alleges that this rule causes the fees paid by merchants to be supracompetitive. The suit seeks treble damages in an unspecified amount, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief. The Animal Land case has been transferred to the multidistrict litigation proceedings and is included in the First Amended Class Action Complaint discussed below.

On June 22, 2005, a purported class action lawsuit was filed by a group of merchants in the U.S. District Court of Connecticut against MasterCard, Visa U.S.A., Visa International and a number of Visa U.S.A. and Visa International member banks alleging, among other things, that Visa’s and MasterCard’s purported setting of interchange fees violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act. In addition, the complaint alleges Visa’s and MasterCard’s purported tying and bundling of transaction fees also constitutes a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Since the filing of this complaint, there have been approximately forty-eight similar complaints, the majority styled as class actions, although ten complaints are on behalf of individual plaintiffs, filed on behalf of merchants against Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard, and in some cases, certain Visa U.S.A. and Visa International member banks, in federal courts in California, Connecticut, Kentucky, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Wisconsin. Visa International was named as a defendant in more than thirty of these complaints. On October 19, 2005, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order transferring these cases to Judge Gleeson of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York for coordination of pre-trial proceedings. On April 24, 2006, the group of purported class plaintiffs filed a First Amended Class Action Complaint. Taken together, the claims in the First Amended Class Action Complaint and in the ten complaints brought on behalf of individual merchants are generally brought under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. Specifically, the complaints contain some or all of the following claims: (i) that Visa’s and MasterCard’s setting of interchange fees (for both credit and offline debit transactions) violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act; (ii) that Visa and MasterCard have enacted and enforced various rules, including the no surcharge rule and purported anti-steering rules, in violation of Section 1 or 2 of the Sherman Act; (iii) that Visa’s and

159

MasterCard’s purported bundling of the acceptance of premium credit cards to standard credit cards constitutes an unlawful tying arrangement; and (iv) that Visa and MasterCard have unlawfully tied and bundled transaction fees. In addition to the claims brought under federal antitrust law, some of these complaints contain certain state unfair competition law claims based upon the same conduct described above. These interchange-related litigations also seek treble damages in an unspecified amount (although several of the complaints allege that the plaintiffs expect that damages will range in the tens of billions of dollars), as well as attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief.

Visa U.S.A. and Visa International answered the First Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint and the individual merchant complaints on June 9, 2006. The court has ordered that new fact discovery may proceed and such fact discovery is scheduled to be completed by November 30, 2007. Expert discovery is scheduled to be completed by July 18, 2008. Summary judgment and other pretrial motions are scheduled to be completed by November 24, 2008.

Currency Conversion Litigation

Visa U.S.A. and Visa International are defendants in a series of actions, described in more detail below, that challenge how the price of using Visa-branded credit and/or debit/ATM cards to make transactions in a foreign currency or foreign country was set and disclosed. These actions include claims relating to the 1% fee that Visa U.S.A. and Visa International formerly assessed on members on transactions in foreign currencies, and claims relating to how Visa U.S.A. and Visa International set their base exchange rate. These cases are described in more detail below. These matters have been settled, although the settlement approval process is still proceeding.

The MDL Action

Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard, Citicorp Diners Club, Inc., or Diners Club, and several Visa U.S.A. and Visa International member financial institutions, and in some cases their affiliates and parents, are defendants in a number of federal class actions that allege, among other things, violations of federal antitrust laws based on an asserted 1% currency conversion “fee” assessed on members by the payment card networks on transactions involving the purchase of goods or services in a foreign currency. Pursuant to orders of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the federal complaints have been consolidated or coordinated in MDL 1409 (In re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litigation), which we refer to as the MDL Action, before Judge William H. Pauley III in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The operative pre-settlement complaint in the MDL Action alleges two theories of antitrust conspiracy under Section 1 of the Sherman Act: (i) an alleged inter-association conspiracy among MasterCard, together with its members, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International, together with their members, and Diners Club to fix currency conversion fees allegedly charged to cardholders of no less than 1% of the transaction amount and frequently more; and (ii) two alleged intra-association conspiracies, whereby each of Visa U.S.A./Visa International and MasterCard is claimed separately to have conspired with its members to fix currency conversion fees allegedly charged to cardholders of no less than 1% of the transaction amount and to facilitate and encourage institution—and collection—of second tier currency conversion surcharges. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International deny the allegations in the complaint. The complaint also asserts claims against some of the non-Visa defendants for violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act and/or violation of the South Dakota Consumer Protection Statutes.

Fact and expert discovery in this matter have closed. On November 12, 2003 plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification, which was granted on October 15, 2004. On March 9, 2005, Judge Pauley issued a decision on defendants’ motion to reconsider the class certification decision. The Judge ruled that the arbitration provisions in the cardholder agreements of several member bank defendants are valid as to all of the defendants and stayed those cardholders’ claims pending arbitration. Plaintiffs moved for further reconsideration, which was denied by Judge Pauley on June 16, 2005. In addition, Judge Pauley ruled that some cardholders of Citibank, Chase, and, in a ruling dated December 7, 2005, Diners Club, would not be required to arbitrate their claims. The 2005 rulings on class certification and arbitration were appealed, but the appeals are not currently under consideration.

160

On July 20, 2006, the parties entered into the settlement agreement discussed below under “The Currency Conversion Settlement Agreements.”

The Schwartz Action

Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard are defendants in Schwartz v. Visa International Corp. (sic), et al., Superior Court of the State of California, Alameda County, Case No. 822404-4, which we refer to as the Schwartz Action, in which the plaintiff purports to be acting on behalf of the general public. The lawsuit alleges that Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and MasterCard wrongfully imposed an asserted one percent currency conversion “fee” on every credit card transaction by U.S. MasterCard and Visa cardholders involving the purchase of goods or services in a foreign currency, and that such alleged “fee” is supposedly unfair, unlawful, unconscionable, and deceptive. Plaintiff contends that defendants’ alleged acts violate California’s Unfair Competition Law, California Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. The Schwartz Action claims that the alleged “fee” grossly exceeds any costs the defendants might incur in connection with currency conversions relating to credit card purchase transactions made in foreign countries and is not properly disclosed to cardholders. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International deny these allegations.

Trial of the Schwartz Action commenced on May 20, 2002 and concluded on November 27, 2002. On April 8, 2003, the trial court judge issued a final decision, finding that Visa U.S.A.’s and Visa International’s currency conversion process does not violate the Truth in Lending Act or regulations, nor is it unconscionably priced under California law. However, the judge found that the practice is deceptive under California law, and ordered that Visa U.S.A. and Visa International mandate that members disclose the currency conversion process to cardholders in cardholder agreements, applications, solicitations and monthly billing statements. The judge also ordered restitution to U.S. cardholders. The judge issued a decision on restitution on September 19, 2003, which requires a traditional notice and claims process in which consumers have approximately six months to submit their claims. The court issued its final judgment on October 31, 2003. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International appealed the judgment. The final judgment and restitution process were stayed pending this appeal. On August 6, 2004, the court awarded plaintiffs attorneys’ fees in the amount of $28.2 million, half to be paid by MasterCard and half by Visa U.S.A. and Visa International. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International subsequently filed a notice of appeal on the attorneys’ fee award. In February 2005, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International filed additional appellate briefing regarding the applicability of Proposition 64, which amended sections of California’s Unfair Competition Law dealing with standing to bring claims on behalf of others, to this action. On September 28, 2005, the appellate court reversed the trial court, finding that the plaintiff lacked standing to pursue the action in light of Proposition 64. Plaintiff filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court on November 7, 2005, which was granted on December 14, 2005. However, the California Supreme Court deferred taking further action pending further proceedings in other cases that raised related issues.

On July 20, 2006, the parties entered into the settlement agreement discussed below under “—The Currency Conversion Settlement Agreements.”

The Shrieve Action

Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard are defendants in a putative nationwide class action (statewide as to MasterCard) in California state court, Shrieve v. Visa U.S.A. Inc., et al., Superior Court for the State of California, Alameda County, Case No. RG04155097, which we refer to as the Shrieve Action. Plaintiffs allege that defendants impose a “hidden transaction fee” of 1% on debit card transactions and ATM withdrawals in foreign countries, and that defendants therefore violated California’s Unfair Competition Law. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International deny the allegations in plaintiffs’ complaint.

Following the passage of Proposition 64, which limited who had standing to bring Unfair Competition Law claims, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court denied this motion. In January 2006, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International filed a writ petition with the court of Appeal seeking review of this denial. In February 2006, plaintiffs moved in the trial court for certification of their action as a class.

161

Defendants have opposed this motion. While this writ petition and motion were pending, plaintiffs entered into the settlement agreement discussed below under “The Currency Conversion Settlement Agreements,” and further consideration of this action has been deferred until after the November 2, 2007 Final Fairness Hearing.

The Mattingly Action

Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard are defendants in a putative nationwide class action (statewide as to MasterCard) in California state court, Mattingly v. Visa U.S.A. Inc., et al., Superior Court for the State of California, Alameda County, Case No. RG05198142, the Mattingly Action. Plaintiffs allege that defendants impose a “hidden transaction fee” of 1% on credit card transactions in foreign countries, and that defendants therefore violated California’s Unfair Competition Law. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International deny the allegations in plaintiffs’ complaint.

In January 2006, plaintiffs moved to amend their complaint to change the start of their putative class period to February 14, 2001 instead of October 23, 2002. While this motion was pending, the parties entered into the MDL Settlement Agreement, and further consideration of this action has been deferred until after the November 2, 2007 Final Fairness Hearing discussed below under “The Currency Conversion Settlement Agreements.”

The Baker Action

Visa U.S.A. and Visa International are defendants in Baker v. Visa International Corp. (sic), et al., 06-CV-15447 (S.D.N.Y.), coordinated or consolidated with MDL 1409; formerly 06-CV-376 (S.D. Cal.), originally filed in the Superior Court for the State of California, San Diego County, Case No. GIC 839908, the Baker Action. Plaintiffs in the Baker Action allege that Visa U.S.A. and Visa International impose a hidden mark-up included in the base exchange rate used to convert credit card transactions in foreign currencies. Plaintiffs further allege that Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s actions violate California’s Unfair Competition Law and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act and breached a fiduciary duty owed by Visa U.S.A. and Visa International to the members of plaintiffs’ putative world-wide class. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International deny the allegations in plaintiffs’ complaint.

Following the settlement of the Baker Action, discussed below under “The Currency Conversion Settlement Agreements,” the matter was transferred from the Southern District of California to the Southern District of New York, where it has been coordinated or consolidated with the MDL Action.

The Currency Conversion Settlement Agreements

On July 20, 2006, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International entered into a settlement in the MDL Action. Under the terms of that settlement, the defendants, which include Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard, Citicorp Diners Club Inc. and several banks, will pay $336.0 million to settle monetary claims by eligible cardholders, the costs of administering the settlement and notice to cardholders, and any court-approved fees and expenses to attorneys for the class and awards to the class representatives. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s portion of the settlement payment, which has already been funded, is approximately $100.1 million. In addition, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International agreed that for five years they would separately identify or itemize any fees added to transactions because they occurred in a foreign country or involved a foreign currency. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International further agreed that if, within five years, they materially modify their current practices with regard to calculating the base exchange rate they use for foreign currency transactions and the new practices include the systematic use of rates outside of a wholesale or government-mandated/managed rate, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International will require their issuing members in the United States to change their disclosures regarding base exchange rates to conform with the changed practices. As part of this settlement, plaintiffs in the Shrieve Action and the Mattingly Action agreed that they would ask the court to dismiss their actions with prejudice as to Visa U.S.A. and Visa International once the MDL settlement receives court approval.

162

Also as part of this settlement, Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard agreed to pay $32.0 million in attorneys’ fees to resolve the Schwartz Action. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s portion of this payment is approximately $18.6 million, to be funded in September 2007.

Finally, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International entered into a settlement in the Baker Action. Under the terms of this settlement agreement, the parties agreed to undertake their best efforts to secure certain changes to the notice of settlement to be provided to class members in the MDL Action, and plaintiffs agreed not to object or otherwise oppose approval of the MDL Settlement Agreement. Upon final approval of the MDL Settlement Agreement, plaintiffs shall seek to dismiss the Baker Action. If the Baker Action is dismissed, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International shall pay $1 million plus interest from September 14, 2006 as attorneys’ fees and costs. If, however, within 60 days of final approval of the MDL Settlement Agreement, the Baker Action has still not been dismissed, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International shall pay $500,000 plus interest from September 14, 2006 as attorneys’ fees and costs.

On November 8, 2006, the court in the MDL Action issued an order preliminarily approving the MDL Settlement Agreement. Among other things, this order created, for settlement purposes only, a Settlement Damages Class consisting of holders of U.S. issued Visa- or MasterCard-branded credit and debit cards or Diners Club-branded credit cards who used their cards to make a foreign payment transaction between February 10, 1996 and November 8, 2006, the Settlement Damages Class. The court also approved, for settlement purposes only, the “Settlement Injunctive Class,” which contains all persons who held a U.S. issued Visa- or MasterCard-branded credit or debit card or Diners Club-branded credit card as of November 8, 2006. Charge cards are included in the definition of “credit cards.” On November 14, 2006, Bernd Bildstein, plaintiff in Bildstein v. MasterCard International Incorporated, No. 03 Civ. 9826 (S.D.N.Y.), a case coordinated with the MDL Action, filed a Notice of Appeal from the grant of preliminary approval. The court has set a hearing on entry of Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal, or the Final Fairness Hearing, for November 2, 2007 to review this and other objections to the settlement. Should the MDL court approve the MDL Settlement Agreement, this approval would be subject to a possible appeal. In view of concerns raised by putative class members, the court has appointed a special master to work with the parties to review and amend, as appropriate, the plan for class notice and distribution of the settlement fund and to determine whether the proposed settlement agreement is fair, adequate and reasonable with respect to all class members.

Based upon the court’s preliminary approval of the MDL settlement and other developments, approximately $100.1 million has been paid into a settlement fund to resolve these claims against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International, and legal provision of approximately $20 million has been made for the remainder of the settlement in connection with these currency conversion cases.

Should the MDL Settlement Agreement not receive final court approval, or otherwise terminate, we anticipate that the parties in all of the Currency Conversion Litigation actions would return to the status quo ante in their respective actions.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Starpay

On May 8, 2003, Starpay.com LLC and VIMachine, Inc., which we refer to collectively as Starpay, sued Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Starpay alleged that Visa U.S.A. and Visa International used information provided to it by Starpay in 2000 to create Verified by Visa and to file a Visa patent application on the technology underlying Verified by Visa, and that Verified by Visa infringed U.S. Patent 5,903,878, entitled Method and Apparatus for Electronic Commerce, or the ‘878 patent.

The original Complaint alleged four causes of action: (1) infringement of the ‘878 patent; (2) breach of implied and written nondisclosure agreements covering Starpay’s discussions with Visa U.S.A. and Visa

163

International; (3) “fraud on the Patent Office” through the filing a patent application for an invention that Visa U.S.A. and Visa International allegedly took from Starpay; and (4) a claim under 35 U.S.C. § 291 that the Visa patent application interfered with the ‘878 patent. On July 25, 2003, Starpay filed an Amended Complaint, dropping the third and fourth causes of action, but raising two new ones in their place: unfair competition under California’s Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. and misappropriation of trade secrets under California’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act. On August 25, 2003, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International moved to dismiss three of Starpay’s causes of action. On February 10, 2004, the District Court Judge dismissed the second claim under the statute of limitations and the third claim as preempted by federal patent law.

On February 23, 2004, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International answered Starpay’s remaining causes of action—infringement of the ‘878 patent and misappropriation of trade secrets—and filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that Visa U.S.A. and Visa International are not infringing the ‘878 patent and/or that the ‘878 patent is invalid. On March 16, 2004, Starpay filed its answer to Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s counterclaim.

The Magistrate Judge held hearings on the issue of the construction of various claims of the ‘878 patent in October and November 2004 and in November 2005. On January 19, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation making findings and recommendations. On February 6, 2006, the parties filed their respective objections to the Report with the District Court Judge, and on February 27, 2006 filed responses to each other’s objections. Pursuant to an August 30, 2005 order of the Magistrate Judge, after the District Court Judge rules on these objections and finalizes the claim construction, a case schedule will be set for the remainder of discovery and trial.

Cryptography Research

Visa International is a defendant in litigation filed in the North District of California by Cryptography Research, Inc., or CRI. CRI has asserted causes of action against Visa International for breach of contract, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duties, infringement of eight U.S. patents, and violation of U.S. and California competition laws. These causes of action are based upon CRI’s allegations that Visa International has improperly used, or induced others to use, technology allegedly developed by CRI for securing “Smart Cards” against attacks designed to discover secret information, such as the secret key for performing cryptographic operations. In particular, CRI alleges that Visa International is and, at least since 1998, has been improperly using countermeasures to Differential Power Analysis, or DPA, attacks that were developed by CRI and which CRI claims to own exclusively.

CRI’s original complaint was filed on September 29, 2004 asserting claims for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and for infringement of U.S. patent nos. 6,298,442, 6,304,658, 6,654,884, 6,327,661, 6,510,518, 6,381,699, 6,278,783, and 6,539,092, the Patents in Suit. In response to Visa International’s motion to dismiss, the court ordered CRI to file an amended complaint more specifically identifying its claims and the bases therefor.

On March 7, 2005, CRI filed an amended complaint identifying claims for breach of contract, misrepresentation, fraud in the inducement, and infringement of the eight Patents in Suit. The breach of contract, misrepresentation and fraud in the inducement claims stem from a September 2, 1998 Intellectual Property License Agreement between CRI and Visa International. The license agreement granted Visa International worldwide rights to CRI’s patent applications that ultimately matured into the Patents in Suit. The primary issue in both the breach of contract and misrepresentation claims is whether Visa International was able to track, and in fact properly tracked, all issued Visa-branded cards subject to the license and paid the resulting royalties.

Discovery in this matter is currently ongoing. A patent claims construction hearing was held on November 8 and 9, 2005. On October 19, 2006, the parties received the first of the eight pending claim construction orders, which construed the disputed terms in U.S. patent no. 6,327,661. Although we expect the court to rule on the remaining claims shortly, there is no deadline for the court to issue its ruling. The court’s orders will be critical to determining which of Visa products will continue to be relevant in this litigation.

164

On March 22, 2007, CRI filed its Second Amended Complaint, adding claims for breach of fiduciary duty and violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and California’s Unfair Competition Law. In particular, CRI alleges that Visa International and MasterCard entered into three conspiracies in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act: (1) to refrain from competing with respect to the security from DPA attacks of their Smart Cards, which conspiracy allegedly began in 1998; (2) to boycott (jointly refuse to license) CRI’s Countermeasure patents; and (3) to boycott by removing CRI’s DPA-Resistant Session Key Derivation System technology from the Visa, MasterCard and EMVCo. specifications, the latter two of which conspiracies allegedly began in 2005 following this lawsuit. In addition, CRI alleges that Visa International has conspired with its Smart Card chip and card vendors to boycott CRI’s Countermeasure Patents. CRI further alleges that Visa International is liable under California’s Cartwright Act, Bus. & Prof. Code Sections 16720-70, and the California Business & Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. Visa International filed its answer to the Second Amended Complaint and related counterclaims on April 23, 2007.

Vale Canjeable

On November 21, 2006, Vale Canjeable Ticketven, C.A., filed an action in the Fifth Municipal Court of Caracas, Venezuela against Todoticket 2004, C.A., and Visa International seeking a preliminary injunction preventing use of the Visa Vale mark in Venezuela. In December 2006, Vale Canjeable Ticketven, C.A. also filed a claim with the Fourth Commercial Court of First Instance of Caracas, alleging that the defendants infringed the plaintiff’s rights as the holder of the trademark registries and requesting that the court: (i) declare that the plaintiff is the only person authorized to use the expression “Vale” in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers; (ii) prohibit the defendants from using the expression “Vale” in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers; (iii) order the defendants to pay VEB 50 billion (U.S. $23.3 million) in non-pecuniary (moral) damages; and (iv) order the defendants to indemnify the pecuniary damages caused to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also requested that the court order the defendants to pay the legal costs and expenses related to the judicial process.

On November 29, 2006, the Fifth Municipal Court of Caracas granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting use of the “Vale” in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers. On December 6, 2006, Visa International filed a constitutional objection to the court’s ruling. The objection was dismissed on December 19, 2006 by the Fourth Commercial Court of First Instance of Caracas. Visa International appealed this decision, which was denied in March 2007. On March 21, 2007, defendants filed a motion with the Fourth Commercial Court of First Instance of Caracas, seeking revocation of the preliminary injunction granted by the Fifth Municipal Court of Caracas. The court’s decision on this motion is pending.

Other Litigation

The ATM Exchange

On November 14, 2005, The ATM Exchange filed a complaint for money damages against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The plaintiff asserts claims of promissory estoppel, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentation, alleging that Visa’s deferment of a July 1, 2004, member deadline that required newly deployed ATMs to be certified by a Visa-recognized laboratory as meeting certain PIN-entry device testing requirements harmed the plaintiff by reducing demand for its ATM upgrade solution. The parties engaged in written discovery, party and third-party depositions, and expert discovery. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International anticipate filing dispositive motions in the case by June 29, 2007. Trial is tentatively scheduled for September 2007.

Parke

On June 27, 2005, a purported consumer and merchant class action was filed in California state court against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard, Merrick Bank and CardSystems Solutions, Inc. (Parke). The complaint stems from a data-security breach at CardSystems, a payment card processor that handled Visa and

165

other payment brand transactions. The complaint alleges that Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s failure to inform cardholders of the CardSystems breach in a timely manner constitutes an unlawful and/or unfair business practice under California’s Unfair Competition Law and violates California’s statutory privacy-notice law. In August 2005, the court denied the plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order, except with respect to the defendants’ retention of affected account-identifying information, and in September 2005 denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Also in September 2005, the court dismissed the claims brought by the merchant class. On November 18, 2005, the defendants answered the remaining claims. Limited discovery occurred.

CardSystems filed for bankruptcy in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona in May 2006, staying the litigation as to it. The Parke plaintiffs removed the case to U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on August 10, 2006 and then sought to transfer the case to federal court in Arizona. Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and MasterCard moved for remand to state court. On October 11, 2006, the court granted the defendants’ motion for remand and denied the plaintiffs’ motion to transfer the case. Proceedings involving CardSystems continue in the bankruptcy court in Arizona, and the Parke plaintiffs appear to be pursuing claims against CardSystems in that forum. The state court in California has not set deadlines for discovery or trial.

District of Columbia Civil Investigative Demand

On January 5, 2007, the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia issued a Civil Investigative Demand, or “CID,” to Visa U.S.A. seeking information regarding a potential violation of Section 28-4502 of the District of Columbia Antitrust Act. The D.C. Attorney General’s office is coordinating parallel investigations by the Attorneys General of New York and Ohio. The CID seeks documents and narrative responses to several interrogatories and document requests, which focus on PIN debit. Visa U.S.A. continues to cooperate with the Attorneys General in connection with the CID.

166

INFORMATION ABOUT VISA INTERNATIONAL

In 1974, National BankAmericard Inc. incorporated IBANCO Ltd. as a non–stock corporation in Delaware to administer the BankAmericard program internationally. In 1977, IBANCO Ltd. changed its name to Visa International Service Association, National BankAmericard changed its name to Visa U.S.A. Inc., and the BankAmericard brand was changed to Visa.

Visa International is currently owned by the three separately incorporated regional group members: Visa U.S.A. Inc., Visa Europe Ltd., and Visa Canada Association, as well as approximately 2,400 financial institution customers, as of December 31, 2006, in the following three unincorporated geographic regions:

• Visa AP;

• Visa LAC; and

• Visa CEMEA.

Visa International owns the trademarks and intellectual property related to the Visa brand which it licenses to its members. Visa International earns revenue primarily from service fees charged to its customers.

Visa International establishes the global rules and standards for operation of the Visa payments network, including standards for card design, transaction processing data requirements, and dispute resolution. These rules and standards promote global interoperability of Visa products and ensure protection of the consumer, merchant, and financial guarantees that the Visa brand represents.

In addition to the development of standards for the Visa payments system, Visa International supports the development of industry payment standards through a number of external standards-setting organizations, such as EMVCo LLC, or EMVCo and the PCI Security Standards Council. Visa has donated intellectual property to these bodies as a means to accelerate the broad adoption of certain payments technology standards. Visa International represents the interests of all Visa regions through its participation in such standards-setting organizations.

Visa International’s corporate headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area. As of December 31, 2006, Visa International had 482 employees, excluding personnel employed by the unincorporated regions.

Visa Asia Pacific Business Overview

Visa AP is responsible for administering the Visa card programs operated by financial institution members in more than 30 countries in the Asia Pacific region, including Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.

As of December 31, 2006, Visa AP had approximately 800 financial institution customers, which had issued more than 325 million cards bearing our brands, excluding Visa-branded cards issued by Chinese issuers, which cannot be used for domestic purchases within China. Visa AP offers a broad range of payment products including credit, debit, pre-paid and commercial programs. As of December 31, 2006, credit products accounted for approximately 70% of Visa-branded cards issued within the region. During 2006, a number of products and services were launched, including a cross border remittance program in Malaysia using a low cost secure funds transfer service (Visa Money Transfer) and Visa Bill Payment, a bill payment service in India and Singapore. In addition, as of December 31, 2006, Visa AP members reported that they had issued more than 63 million EMV-compliant chip cards. In addition, as of December 31, 2006, our customers reported that there were more than 1.3 million EMV based contactless cards in circulation in Taiwan, Malaysia and Korea bearing our brands.

Visa is the exclusive payment card and official payment service of the Olympic Games to be hosted in Beijing in 2008.

167

Visa AP’s corporate headquarters is in Singapore, and it has additional offices in 20 cities throughout the region. One of our global processing centers is located in Japan. As of December 31, 2006, Visa AP had 605 employees.

Visa Latin America and Caribbean Business Overview

Visa LAC is responsible for administering the Visa programs operated by financial institution members in over 44 countries and territories within its geographic region, including Mexico, Central America, South America and the Caribbean.

As of December 31, 2006, Visa LAC had approximately 520 financial institution customers, which reported that they had issued more than 262 million cards bearing our brands. Visa LAC offers a full set of product platforms to member financial institutions, including credit, debit, prepaid and commercial platforms. In addition, as of December 31, 2006, our customers reported that there were more than 21 million EMV-compliant chip cards in circulation bearing our brands.

Visa LAC has supported the development of a common acquiring business platform for customers in countries such as Brazil, Dominican Republic, Uruguay, Peru and Guatemala. These platforms are jointly owned by these customers and Visa LAC. For the year ending December 2006, countries with these acquiring business platforms represented 54% of the payments volume and 66% of transactions in the region.

Visa LAC has developed several specific platforms in conjunction with issuers in its region in order to provide customized payment services. For example, in Brazil and other countries in South America, legislation provides tax incentives to employers that grant their employees monies targeted for use in payment of basic necessities, such as food, transportation, tolls and gasoline. These benefits received by employees may only be used under very specific rules. Employers historically distributed these monies through paper vouchers or “tickets,” but the paper-based system is subject to fraud. Visa LAC initiated Visa Vale in Brazil, one of the largest government benefits markets in the world, in partnership with three of its customers. In Brazil, this program has been extended from employment benefits to include road toll payments. Visa Vale Pedagio (Tolls) is a chip-based card system that automates the collection of road tolls on Brazil’s extensive highway system.

Visa Giro allows a financial institution to distribute remittances funds to beneficiaries using Visa prepaid, debit or credit card. This platform enables greater operational efficiency, greater financial transparency for local governments and greater security and convenience for the recipient. In 2005, the Interamerican Development Bank estimated that the total remittance market to the LAC region was $52 billion.

Visa LAC’s corporate headquarters is in Miami, Florida, and it has five additional offices throughout the region. As of December 31, 2006, Visa LAC had 417 employees.

Visa Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa Business Overview

Visa CEMEA is responsible for administering the Visa programs operated by financial institution members in 82 countries within its geographic region, including Croatia, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Morocco, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, South Africa, Ukraine and the United Arab Emirates.

As of December 31, 2006, Visa CEMEA had more than 1,000 financial institution customers, which had issued more than 111 million cards bearing our brands. Because of the preponderance of emerging markets in the region, Visa debit products constitute the largest number of cards in circulation, with the Electron card constituting more than 80% of all Visa cards issued. In addition, Visa CEMEA has launched a number of innovative product initiatives, such as salary cards issued to previously unbanked workers, and social cards, which combine Visa financial applications with government identification and social benefits information, as well as domestic and cross-border money transfer programs. As of December 31, 2006, our customers reported that there were more than seven million EMV-compliant chip cards in circulation.

Visa CEMEA’s corporate headquarters is in London, and it has nine additional offices throughout the region. As of December 31, 2006, Visa CEMEA had 371 employees.

168

INFORMATION ABOUT VISA U.S.A.

Visa U.S.A. traces its history back to 1958, when Bank of America launched its blue, white and gold BankAmericard. In 1970, Bank of America transferred ownership of the BankAmericard program to the financial institutions that issued the card, forming National BankAmericard Inc., a Delaware non–stock corporation. In 1977, National BankAmericard Inc. changed its name to Visa U.S.A. Inc. Visa U.S.A. is the largest group member of Visa International. Visa U.S.A. is currently owned by its approximately 13,400 customer financial institutions.

Visa U.S.A. is responsible for administering Visa payment programs in the United States. Visa U.S.A. is also the majority owner of Inovant, which is the entity that operates the VisaNet transaction processing system. Inovant is operated as part of Visa U.S.A.

As of December 31, 2006, the customers of Visa U.S.A. reported that they had issued more than 512 million cards bearing our brands. Visa U.S.A. is the leading payments company in the United States, with more cards, payments volume and transactions than any of our general purpose card competitors in the U.S. As of December 31, 2006, we believe that our payment products account for approximately $17 of every $100 of consumer purchase volume in the United States.

In an effort to increase awareness of the importance of protecting consumers’ financial data, Visa U.S.A. embarked on its second nation-wide town hall tour with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in June 2006 to educate small businesses about new fraud risks and how they can better protect themselves and their customers’ information. Visa U.S.A. also announced the implementation of a process called Account Data Compromise Recovery, or ADCR, effective October 2006, as an enhanced recovery process that is designed to provide faster reimbursements to Visa U.S.A. issuers, while helping acquirers and, where applicable, their merchant customers better forecast their potential fraud liability.

For over a decade, Visa U.S.A. has been working to expand acceptance in new merchant categories, such as utilities and quick service restaurants, to provide additional convenience and utility for all cardholders.

Visa is the most recognized payments brand in the United States. Visa U.S.A.’s advertising and sponsorships play a critical role in differentiating the Visa brand from those of its competitors. In 2006, Visa U.S.A. launched a new advertising campaign with the tagline “Life Takes Visa.” In addition, the Visa U.S.A. portfolio of marketing partnerships includes the National Football League, Broadway and the Kentucky Derby. Together, these marketing initiatives help Visa U.S.A. customers develop products, services and promotions that complement a range of cardholder interests.

Visa U.S.A.’s corporate headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area. As of December 31, 2006, Visa U.S.A. had 3,640 employees, including the employees of Inovant.

169

INFORMATION ABOUT VISA CANADA

Visa Canada, which is responsible for administering Visa payment programs in Canada, is the second oldest Visa region. In 1968, Royal Bank of Canada, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, The Toronto Dominion Bank and Banque Canadienne National formed CHARGEX Ltd. through a license from BankAmericard. In 1973, these and other issuing financial institutions formed Canadian Bank Card Association, or CBCA. In 1977, the Visa brand made its Canadian debut on Canadian CHARGEX cards. Visa Canada Association succeeded the CBCA and was incorporated as a non–stock membership corporation under the laws of Ontario in 1989. As of December 31, 2006, Visa Canada had 24 customer financial institutions, which reported that they had issued over 29 million Visa branded cards.

Prior to February 2006, Visa Canada had rules that restricted its customers from issuing both Visa and certain other card association-branded cards. Visa Canada has changed those rules to allow member financial institutions to issue cards on all other networks.

Visa Canada first announced its migration to chip cards in 2003, and conducted the first chip card transaction in Canada in 2005. In November 2006, members of the Canadian payment card industry jointly announced their commitment to conduct a chip technology trial in Ontario.

Visa Canada participates in Verified by Visa, a global program designed to make shopping on the Internet safer and more secure for shoppers and merchants, by allowing cardholders to authenticate themselves to participating merchants. More than two million Canadians have registered for Verified by Visa. Visa Canada also offers Canadian consumer cardholders the Visa Zero Liability policy to provide protection against liability for unauthorized transactions.

Visa is the exclusive payment card and official payment service of the Winter Olympic Games to be hosted in Vancouver in 2010. Visa Canada has provided long-term sponsorship and support to Canadian athletes through Team Visa, a sponsorship and mentorship program launched in 2004 to provide support to aspiring Canadian Olympic and Paralympic athletes. Visa Canada also supports the Canadian men’s and women’s bobsleigh and skeleton teams. Visa Canada is committed to its sponsorship as the exclusive credit card for the Toronto International Film Festival through 2011. Visa Canada has also been a sponsor of the Vancouver International Film Festival since 1998.

Visa Canada works closely with government agencies and law enforcement to help educate consumers and merchants about fraud and security, including participation in the Fraud Prevention Forum and the annual national Fraud Prevention Month spearheaded by the Canadian Competition Bureau and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Visa Canada has developed financial literacy educational tools to ensure that cardholders have access to information about the responsible use of credit.

Visa Canada’s corporate headquarters is in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. As of December 31, 2006, Visa Canada had 97 employees.

170

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF VISA INTERNATIONAL

The selected Visa International consolidated statements of operations data and consolidated balance sheet data presented below as of and for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006, have been derived from Visa International’s consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus. The selected Visa International consolidated statements of operations data as of and for each of the fiscal years September 30, 2003 and 2002 presented below have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Visa International, which are not included in this proxy statement-prospectus. The selected consolidated statements of operations data and consolidated balance sheet data presented below for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 have been derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa International included elsewhere in this proxy statement–prospectus and, in the opinion of Visa International’s management, contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of Visa International’s financial position and results of operations for such periods. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future and results for the six months ended March 31, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of, and are not projections for, the results to be expected for the full year fiscal ending September 30, 2007.

The selected statistical data presented below are based on operating certificates compiled and reported by Visa International’s members and are unaudited. All data is subject to revision and amendment by Visa International’s members subsequent to the date of its release. These revisions are reflected in the information presented below. The selected statistical data do not purport to indicate results of operations as of any future date or for any future period.

Current quarter service fees are assessed using a calculation of pricing applied to prior quarter volumes. Payments volume data accumulated from Visa International’s members over the twelve-month periods ended June 30 is used as the basis for recording service fee revenue during fiscal years ending September 30. Payments volume data for the six month periods ended December 31 is used as the basis for recording service fee revenue during the six month periods ending March 31. For purposes of the table below, total volume represents payments volume plus cash volume and includes the impact of balance transfers and convenience checks, but excludes proprietary PLUS volume, and certain domestic volume transactions.

The statistical information denominated in non-U.S. dollars is calculated by applying an established U.S. dollar/local currency exchange rate for each local currency in which volumes on Visa branded products are reported to Visa International. For fiscal 2006, these exchange rates are calculated on a quarterly basis. In order to minimize the effect of fluctuating exchange rates among currencies, statistics reported in U.S. dollars for periods prior to fiscal 2006 have been converted at the fiscal 2006 exchange rates.

The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Visa International” and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Financial Data	Six Months Ended March 31,				For the Years Ended September 30,
	2007		2006		2006		20051		20041,2		20032		2002
(in thousands)	(unaudited)				(audited)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data
Operating revenues	$	859,257	$	652,716	$	1,262,555	$	1,147,430	$	1,411,789	$	1,361,187	$	1,202,693
Operating income	$	221,791	$	113,160	$	20,446	$	101,601	$	54,855	$	35,509	$	31,467
Income from continuing operations	$	145,180	$	55,072	$	69,755	$	83,201	$	32,289	$	17,425	$	22,056
Income from discontinued operations	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,555	$	3,954
Net income	$	145,180	$	55,072	$	69,755	$	83,201	$	32,289	$	18,980	$	26,010

171

	At March 31,				At September 30,
	2007		2006		2006		2005		20041		20032		2002
(in thousands)	(unaudited)				(audited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Total assets	$	2,022,692	$	1,756,910	$	2,012,539	$	1,767,956	$	1,789,182	$	2,398,802	$	2,112,422
Long-term debt	$	39,941	$	39,916	$	39,929	$	39,904	$	39,879	$	39,854	$	44,821
Total members’ equity	$	750,649	$	590,952	$	606,280	$	535,446	$	453,948	$	421,422	$	380,130
Working capital	$	545,845	$	380,816	$	390,180	$	320,661	$	210,503	$	80,993	$	75,090

	Six Months Ended December 31,						For the Years Ended June 30,
Statistical Data (unaudited)	2006			2005			2006			20051			20041			2003			2002
(in millions, except percentages)
Payments Volume
Credit	$	245,070		$	210,204		$	422,770		$	359,711		$	478,775		$	492,688		$	432,258
Percentage change:		16.6	%		17.1	%		17.5	%		(24.9	)%		(2.8	)%		14.0	%		19.5	%
Debit	$	44,209		$	33,745		$	68,985		$	51,781		$	369,701		$	421,111		$	363,319
Percentage change:		31.0	%		35.5	%		33.2	%		(86.0	)%		(12.2	)%		15.9	%		17.0	%
Commercial & Other	$	35,949		$	29,702		$	58,988		$	51,903		$	70,348		$	65,754		$	51,826
Percentage change:		21.0	%		9.6	%		13.7	%		(26.2	)%		7.0	%		26.9	%		46.5	%
Total Payments Volume	$	325,228		$	273,651		$	550,743		$	463,395		$	918,824		$	979,553		$	847,403
Percentage change:		18.8	%		18.2	%		18.8	%		(49.6	)%		(6.2	)%		15.6	%		19.8	%
Cash Volume	$	388,823		$	317,557		$	637,477		$	510,369		$	747,055		$	799,039		$	702,138
Percentage change:		22.4	%		25.5	%		24.9	%		(31.7	)%		(6.5	)%		13.8	%		32.8	%
Total Volume	$	714,051		$	591,208		$	1,188,220		$	973,764		$	1,665,879		$	1,778,592		$	1,549,541
Percentage change:		20.8	%		22.0	%		22.0	%		(41.5	)%		(6.3	)%		14.8	%		25.3	%
Total Transactions		8,097			6,715			13,857			11,301			19,557			20,194			17,563
Percentage change:		20.6	%		22.6	%		22.6	%		(42.2	)%		(3.2	)%		15.0	%		18.9	%

¹ The comparability of Visa International’s financial and statistical data was affected by the EU region’s incorporation on July 1, 2004. The results of operations for fiscal 2004 only include results from the EU region for the nine months ended June 30, 2004. The balance sheet data at September 30, 2004 does not include any amounts from the EU region. See Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements of Visa International for the year ended September 30, 2006 included in this proxy statement-prospectus for further discussion of this transaction.

² The comparability of Visa International’s financial data was affected by the sale of Inovant to Visa U.S.A. and the subsequent formation of Inovant LLC on January 1, 2003. The operating results of Inovant Inc. are reported as discontinued operations for fiscal 2003 and 2002 and the results of operations for fiscal year 2003 only include results from Inovant for the three months ended December 31, 2002. Starting with fiscal 2003, the balance sheet data does not include any balances from Inovant.

172

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF

VISA INTERNATIONAL

This management’s discussion and analysis provides a review of the results of operations, financial condition and the liquidity and capital resources of Visa International and its consolidated subsidiaries and outlines the factors that have affected recent earnings, as well as those factors that may affect future earnings. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of Visa International and its consolidated subsidiaries, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Overview

The primary business of Visa International is to operate, expand, enhance and support a global payments system. Visa International’s primary customers are its member financial institutions located in Visa International’s three unincorporated regions, Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA, and its three separately incorporated regional group members, Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada. For its members within the three unincorporated regions, Visa International provides broad payment product platforms, including consumer credit, debit, prepaid and commercial payments. Visa International also facilitates transaction processing for its members within the three unincorporated regions. The types of payment product platforms and transaction processing and related services provided by Visa International varies among the three unincorporated regions. As of December 31, 2006, Visa International had approximately 2,400 member financial institutions within its three unincorporated regions, which had issued more than 755 million Visa, Visa Electron, PLUS and Interlink branded cards. For the incorporated regional group members and the unincorporated regions, Visa International provides services through its corporate headquarters, Visa Worldwide Services, or VWS, which are related to global brand management, global product enhancements, management of global system development and interoperability, and corporate support.

The Visa brand and related trademarks are key intangible assets, which Visa International licenses to and for use by Visa International’s members in the unincorporated regions as well as the incorporated regional group members. Visa International also owns the intellectual property related to VisaNet and other Visa systems. VisaNet is the processing system through which transaction processing and related services are offered to Visa International’s members, and is operated by Inovant, a majority-owned subsidiary of Visa U.S.A. and an affiliate of Visa International.

Visa International’s operating revenues are primarily derived from service fees, international service revenues and data processing fees. Visa International does not issue cards, set fees or determine the interest rates consumers will be charged on Visa branded cards. Issuing members have the responsibility for determining these and most other competitive card features. In addition, Visa International does not generally solicit merchants directly or establish the fees that merchants are charged for card acceptance, including the merchant discount rate. Both of these functions are generally the responsibility of acquiring members.

Visa International is currently owned by the member financial institutions located in the three unincorporated regions of Visa International and the three separately incorporated regional group members. Each of the incorporated regional group members separately reports its financial results and is represented by its own board of directors. The unincorporated regions are each operating divisions within Visa International, and Visa International’s results of operations include the results of the unincorporated regions and VWS. VWS is the corporate headquarters of Visa International and oversees a number of activities of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe, including multi-currency settlement, brand management, sponsorship and partnerships, product platform development and enhancement, risk management, and technology management. Visa AP, Visa CEMEA, Visa LAC and VWS represent the four operating segments of Visa International. On July 1, 2004, the European Union region was incorporated and became Visa Europe, a regional group member of

173

Visa International. Prior to that date, the European Union region was an operating segment of Visa International. For a discussion of Visa International’s operating segments and related financial disclosures, refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2006 included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Net income in the six months ended March 31, 2007 was $145.2 million, an increase of $90.1 million, or 163.6%, from the same period of fiscal 2006. Operating income in the six months ended March 31, 2007 increased by $108.6 million, or 96.0%, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006, as a result of a 31.6% increase in operating revenues, partially offset by an 18.1% increase in operating expenses.

• The 31.6% increase in operating revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006 was primarily driven by growth of 19%, 18% and 15% in payments volume, the monetary value of cross-border transactions and the number of transactions processed, respectively, modifications to pricing structures, which were implemented at Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA, and a decrease of 23.7% in member incentives. The decline in member incentives occurred primarily in Visa AP, resulting from a termination of an incentive program at the end of fiscal 2006.

• The 18.1% increase in operating expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in fiscal 2006 is primarily a result of an increase in personnel expense due primarily to higher employee incentives, and an increase in professional and consulting services related to the proposed mergers of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada.

• Non-operating income, net, increased 50.8% in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period of fiscal 2006, due to gains on sales of strategic investments and an increase in interest income from short-term investments.

• The provision for income taxes increased 37.0% in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006, due to an 88.8% increase in pre-tax income partially offset by a decline in the effective tax rate to 42.9% in the six months ended March 31, 2007 from 59.1% in the same period of fiscal 2006.

Net income in fiscal 2006 was $69.8 million, a decrease of $13.4 million from fiscal 2005. Operating income in fiscal 2006 decreased by $81.2 million, or 79.9%, as compared to the prior fiscal year, as a result of an 18.8% increase in operating expenses, partially offset by a 10.0% increase in operating revenue.

• The 10.0% increase in operating revenues in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 was primarily driven by growth of 19%, 13% and 17% in payments volume, the monetary value of cross-border transactions and the number of transactions processed, respectively, and modifications to pricing structures at Visa AP which became effective in the second half of fiscal 2005. This increase was partially offset by a 66.6% increase in member incentives, which totaled $302.4 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to $181.5 million in fiscal 2005. The increase in member incentives occurred primarily in Visa AP and Visa LAC.

• The 18.8% increase in operating expenses in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 was primarily a result of an increase of $58.9 million in advertising and promotion expense, reflecting expenses incurred for the 2006 Winter Olympics, as well as expanded advertising activities in Visa LAC. Operating expenses also benefited from a $44.6 million reduction in the value of the settlement risk guarantee obligation in fiscal 2005 reflected in the Visa International’s consolidated balance sheet, compared to a benefit of $0.2 million in fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005 the settlement guarantee was reduced as a result of Visa’s low loss history and sustained performance under its global risk policies and procedures, and other factors. In fiscal 2006, professional and consulting expenses also increased due to costs incurred in connection with strategic organizational and governance matters, which added $13.8 million to professional and consulting services in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005.

174

• Non-operating income, net, increased 94.0% in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005, due to higher dividend income from strategic investments and an increase in interest income from short-term investments.

• The provision for income taxes decreased 50.4% in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005, due to a 30.3% decline in pre-tax income and a decrease in the effective tax rate to 29.5% in fiscal 2006 from 41.4% in fiscal 2005. The decline in the effective tax rate in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 is attributable to a favorable partial resolution of a California audit and the reassessment of federal tax reserves, partially offset by the impact of certain non-deductible expenditures.

Results of Operations

Components of Operating Revenue

Visa International’s operating revenues are derived from service fees, international service revenues, data processing fees and other revenues.

Service Fees

Service fees paid by members in the three unincorporated regions are based upon their utilization of Visa branded products, primarily as measured by payments volume. Payments volume measures the total monetary value of transactions for goods and services purchased with Visa branded credit, debit and prepaid products, as reported by members on quarterly operating certificates. Payments volume does not include cash volume, which generally includes cash disbursements, balance transfers and convenience check transactions associated with Visa branded products. Current quarter service fees are assessed using a calculation of pricing applied to prior quarter volumes.

Visa International has incentive agreements with certain members to build payments volume, increase card issuance and acceptance, and increase Visa branded transactions. These card, volume and support incentives may be multi-year agreements and are earned by members based on their performance over the term of the incentive agreement, which may range from one to seven years in length, and are recognized as a reduction of revenue in the same period as the related revenues are earned, based on management’s estimate of the members’ performance as compared to the terms of the incentive agreement. Customer performance is estimated by using member reported information, transactional information accumulated from Visa’s systems, historical information and discussions with Visa International’s customers. These estimates are compared to actual performance in subsequent periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Visa International also earns cost-based service fees through VWS from the separately incorporated regional group members for providing services related to global brand management, global product enhancements, management of global system development and interoperability, and corporate support. The total amount of these cost-based service fees is determined on a Visa-wide basis and then allocated to each of the incorporated regional group members based primarily on the payments volume generated by their respective members.

International Service Revenues

International service revenues are generated from fees for cross-border payments volume and cash volume in which the issuer’s country is different from the merchant’s country. These fees are charged to members of the unincorporated regions and to members of the separately incorporated regional group members. The fees are typically based on the monetary value of an underlying cross-border transaction, and are in addition to service fees that members pay based on payments volume. International service revenues are also generated through VWS from currency exchange activities in connection with the settlement of multi-currency transactions. International service revenues are influenced by levels of international travel and the extent to which Visa branded products are utilized for travel purposes. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are performed.

175

Data Processing Fees

Data processing fees are charged to members of the unincorporated regions and third parties for transactions processed by Visa’s systems that facilitate transaction authorization, clearing, settlement and information flow with respect to goods and services purchased with Visa branded credit, debit and prepaid products. The actual processing services are performed by Inovant, an affiliate of Visa International that operates VisaNet through an agreement with Visa International. Data processing fees are based primarily on the number and types of transactions processed during a period. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.

Data processing fees are also earned by VWS from the separately incorporated regional group members for data processing services provided to the members of Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada in connection with the settlement of multi-currency monetary transactions.

Other Revenues

Other revenues are earned from members of the unincorporated regions and consist of card recovery bulletin fees, product enhancements, risk-related penalty charges, initial membership fees, contributions by members for regional development and advertising programs, and fees for licensing and certification. Fees for member-funded regional development and advertising programs may be established by an unincorporated region’s board of directors and may be terminated when it is believed that the objectives of a program have been achieved. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.

Presentation of Statistical Data

Statistical data referred to in this proxy statement-prospectus, including payments volume, the monetary value of cross-border transactions and the number of transactions processed, are calculated based on the activities of the members of the unincorporated regions, and do not include the statistical data of separately incorporated regional group members of Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe or Visa Canada.

In addition, throughout this proxy statement-prospectus, payments volume reported with respect to the fiscal years ended September 30 and the six month periods ended March 31 reflects payments volume reported by the members of Visa International for the four quarters ended June 30 and the six months ended December 31, respectively. This is consistent with the use of this data for recording service fee revenue during the fiscal periods for which financial information is provided in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Six Months Ended March 31, 2007 compared to Six Months Ended March 31, 2006

Operating Revenues

Total operating revenues in the six months ended March 31, 2007 increased by 31.6% to $859.3 million, as compared to $652.7 million in the six months ended March 31, 2006. Growth occurred in all categories of operating revenues, driven primarily by the general expansion in card issuance at the unincorporated regions and the favorable impact of regional pricing increases. Payments volume, the monetary value of cross-border transactions and the number of transactions processed increased 19%, 18% and 15%, respectively, in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006.

Operating revenues from Visa AP were $336.4 million and $237.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase of $98.5 million, or 41.4%, was primarily driven by growth of 16%, 13% and 9% in payments volume, the monetary value of cross-border transactions, and the number of transactions processed, respectively, and the positive impact of pricing increases which were implemented in January 2007. Operating revenues were also favorably impacted by a $33.3 million reduction in member incentives.

176

Operating revenues from Visa LAC were $204.3 million and $127.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase of $77.2 million, or 60.7%, was primarily driven by growth of 25%, 20% and 17% in payments volume, the monetary value of cross-border transactions, and the number of transactions processed, respectively, and the positive impact of pricing increases which were implemented in November 2006 and January 2007. In addition, the increase in operating revenues was partially due to a $15.2 million increase in other revenues which were generated from increased fees from members related to regional advertising programs. The increase in revenues from these factors was partially offset by a $5.8 million increase in member incentives.

Operating revenues from Visa CEMEA were $118.3 million and $94.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase of $24.2 million, or 25.7%, was driven by growth of 35%, 30% and 46% in payments volume, the monetary value of cross-border transactions, and the number of transactions processed, respectively. The increase in operating revenue as a result of the volume growth described above as well as October 2006 pricing increases was partially offset by a $2.6 million increase in member incentives.

Operating revenues from VWS, excluding intercompany fees from Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA and other reconciling items totaling $33.0 million and $31.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were $200.3 million and $193.6 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase of $6.7 million, or 3.5%, was due to an increase in operating revenues from currency exchange activities in connection with the settlement of multi-currency transactions, partially offset by a $3.3 million decline in service fee revenue from the incorporated regions.

The following table reflects the components of operating revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:

					2007 vs. 2006
Six Months Ended March 31,	2007		2006		$ Change		% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Service fees	$	360,513	$	272,942	$	87,571	32.1	%
International service revenues		269,807		204,679		65,128	31.8	%
Data processing fees		138,152		120,256		17,896	14.9	%
Other revenues		90,785		54,839		35,946	65.5	%
Total operating revenues	$	859,257	$	652,716	$	206,541	31.6	%

Service fees—The following table provides information with respect to service fees including information regarding member incentives related to service fees, for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:

							2007 vs. 2006
Six Months Ended March 31,	2007			2006			$ Change			% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Gross service fees—members of Visa AP, LAC and CEMEA	$	299,458		$	234,490		$	64,968		27.7	%
Incentives—members of Visa AP, LAC and CEMEA		(88,766	)		(114,929	)		26,163		(22.8	)%
Service fees—incorporated regions		149,821			153,381			(3,560	)	(2.3	)%
Total service fees	$	360,513		$	272,942		$	87,571		32.1	%

The increase in gross service fees for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period of fiscal 2006 is attributable to growth in underlying payments volumes at all regions and pricing increases at Visa LAC. Payments volume growth across the three regions was approximately 19% in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006. The pricing increases in Visa LAC consisted of $9.5 million from a new development fee implemented in January 2007 and $10.3 million due to a change in the domestic acquiring fee structure implemented in October 2006.

177

The increase in service fees was also attributable to a decrease of $26.2 million in member incentives in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006, due primarily to a $33.3 million decrease in Visa AP. In Visa AP, the termination of a member incentive program at the end of fiscal 2006 resulted in a $59.0 million decrease in incentives, which was partially offset by an increase of $25.7 million under other performance-based member incentives. The decrease in member incentives in Visa AP was partially offset by increases in Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA.

Of the total service fees, $149.8 million and $153.4 million were earned from the separately incorporated regional group members—Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada—in the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The $3.6 million decline in these cost-based fees reflected lower fees charged by VWS for management of central systems development.

International service revenues—The increase in international service revenues in the six months ended March 31, 2007 over the same period in fiscal 2006 was due primarily to growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions. In addition, beginning in January 2007, there were modifications to the structures under which certain fees are paid by members in Visa AP and Visa LAC. The growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions was driven by continued expansion in the usage of electronic payments for travel purposes as well as higher levels of international travel in general. Growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions across the three unincorporated regions was 18% in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006. Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA experienced an increase in international service revenues of $27.5 million, $16.8 million and $9.4 million, respectively, in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006. Of the increase in Visa AP and Visa LAC, $12.0 million and $10.9 million, respectively, were due to the modifications to fee structures implemented in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006. In addition, international service revenues increased by $11.4 million in VWS resulting from growth in currency exchange activities in connection with the settlement of multi-currency transactions.

Data processing fees—The increase in data processing fees in the six months ended March 31, 2007 over the same period in fiscal 2006 was driven by combined growth in the number of transactions processed across all three unincorporated regions of 15%, as well as pricing increases at Visa AP and Visa CEMEA. Growth in the number of transactions processed reflects an increase in the numbers of cards issued and efforts to expand the usage of card products. Visa AP, Visa CEMEA and Visa LAC experienced an increase in data processing fees of $6.9 million, $5.9 million and $5.4 million, respectively, in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period of fiscal 2006. Of the increases in Visa AP and Visa CEMEA, $2.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively, were due to the positive impacts of pricing increases implemented in fiscal 2007.

Of the total data processing fees, $2.6 million and $2.4 million were earned from the separately incorporated regional group members—Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada—in the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Other revenues—The increase in other revenues in the six months ended March 31, 2007 from the same period in fiscal 2006 was primarily due to higher fees earned in connection with licensing and card manufacturer certifications, product enhancements, together with higher card recovery bulletin fees, primarily in Visa CEMEA and Visa LAC. In addition, revenue from member-funded regional development and advertising programs increased by $15.2 million in Visa LAC and $6.2 million in Visa AP. Member-funded regional development and advertising programs are approved by each of the unincorporated region’s regional board of directors and may be terminated when it is believed that the objectives of a program have been achieved.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses in the six months ended March 31, 2007 were $637.5 million, an increase of $97.9 million, or 18.1%, over the six months ended March 31, 2006. Operating expenses were higher mainly due to increased spending in personnel expense, as well as professional and consulting services expenses in connection with the proposed mergers of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada.

178

Operating expenses at Visa AP, excluding intercompany allocations from VWS totaling $25.0 million and $24.4 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were $167.9 million and $157.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase of $10.0 million, or 6.3%, was primarily due to a $16.1 million increase in personnel expense mainly related to higher employee incentives and an increase in the number of employees, partially offset by an $11.9 million decrease in advertising and promotion expense resulting from differences in the timing for major advertising spending in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006.

Operating expenses at Visa LAC, excluding intercompany allocations from VWS totaling $6.5 million and $5.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were $141.8 million and $105.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase of $35.9 million, or 33.9%, was primarily due to a $35.4 million increase in advertising and promotion expense, specifically in production, media and sponsorships.

Operating expenses at Visa CEMEA, excluding intercompany allocations from VWS totaling $2.9 million and $2.6 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were $89.7 million and $84.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase of $5.7 million, or 6.8%, was primarily due to a $5.4 million increase in personnel expense mainly related to employee incentive expense.

Operating expenses at VWS, including other reconciling items totaling $8.3 million and $5.7 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were $238.1 million and $191.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase of $46.3 million, or 24.1%, was primarily due to a $41.0 million increase in professional and consulting expense in connection with activities related to the proposed mergers and higher legal costs related to litigation and other legal matters.

The following table reflects the components of operating expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:

					2007 vs. 2006
Six Months Ended March 31,	2007		2006		$ Change			% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Personnel	$	184,883	$	155,005	$	29,878		19.3	%
Affiliates services		96,053		95,210		843		0.9	%
Premises, equipment and software		53,143		47,541		5,602		11.8	%
Communications		17,579		16,083		1,496		9.3	%
Professional and consulting services		81,802		39,607		42,195		106.5	%
Advertising and promotion		152,193		133,397		18,796		14.1	%
Travel and meetings		24,665		25,080		(415	)	(1.7	)%
Other expenses		27,148		27,633		(485	)	(1.8	)%
Total operating expenses	$	637,466	$	539,556	$	97,910		18.1	%

Significant operating expense categories included the following activities during the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006:

Personnel—Personnel expense consists of employee salaries, incentives and benefits expenses. The increase in personnel expense in the six months ended March 31, 2007 from the same period in fiscal 2006 is primarily due to a $15.3 million increase in employee incentives, primarily resulting from an increase in employee headcount at Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA, and also the introduction of a new employee incentive program in Visa AP at the start of fiscal 2007. The increase in employee headcount and annual merit increases added approximately $6.8 million to expense in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006. In addition, severance expenses increased $7.1 million, primarily at VWS, as a result of the termination of senior level employees in the six months ended March 31, 2007. Overall, personnel expense at

179

Visa AP, VWS, Visa CEMEA and Visa LAC increased $16.1 million, $5.6 million, $5.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively. The increase in employee headcount reflects the expansion of Visa International’s business and the growth of its membership base.

Professional and consulting services—Professional and consulting services consist of costs associated with systems development, legal, consulting for strategic, product and marketing projects, tax, audit, and other outside services. The increase in professional and consulting services in the six months ended March 31, 2007 over the same period in fiscal 2006 was partially attributable to a $24.8 million increase in expenses incurred in connection with activities related to the proposed mergers, primarily in VWS. In addition, legal costs related to litigation and other legal matters increased by $13.5 million at VWS in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period of the prior year, primarily due to litigation involving American Express/Discover, Cryptography Research, Inc., and Interchange.

Advertising and promotion—Advertising and promotion expense includes costs associated with advertising and marketing programs, sponsorships, promotions and other related incentives to promote the Visa brand and assist members in achieving their goals. The increase in advertising and promotion expense in the six months ended March 31, 2007 over the same period in fiscal 2006 was primarily due to higher spending on marketing activities by Visa LAC. Expenses in Visa LAC increased $35.4 million due primarily to spending on advertising campaigns in Mexico, Brazil and Chile. The increase was partially offset by lower advertising spending of $11.9 million in Visa AP, due to differences in the timing for major advertising campaigns in the two periods. Additionally, spending in connection with the Olympic Games was lower by approximately $8.3 million in the six months ended in March 31, 2007, as a result of the Winter Olympics in Torino, Italy, which took place in February 2006.

Non-Operating Income, Net, and Provision for Income Taxes

Non-operating income, net, and provision for income taxes in the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

					2007 vs. 2006
Six Months Ended March 31,	2007		2006		$ Change		% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Non-operating income, net	$	32,414	$	21,491	$	10,923	50.8	%
Provision for income taxes	$	109,025	$	79,579	$	29,446	37.0	%

Non-operating income, net—This category consists of interest income earned on short-term investments, interest expense on borrowings, dividend income, equity earnings or losses of unconsolidated investments, real estate rental income, and other gains or losses, including impairment charges from strategic and other investments, and net gains or losses from the sale of assets. The increase in non-operating income, net, in the six months ended March 31, 2007 over the same period in fiscal 2006 was primarily due to a $6.1 million increase in gains from sales of strategic investments at VWS, as well as higher interest income of $4.8 million from the VWS short-term investment portfolio. The increase in interest income is due to higher market interest rates and higher balances of short-term investments in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006.

Provision for income taxes—The increase in the provision for income taxes was the result of an increase in pre-tax income partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate. Pre-tax income for the six months ended March 31, 2007 increased $119.6 million, or 88.8%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The effective tax rate for the six months ended March 31, 2007 was 42.9%, compared to 59.1% for the six months ended March 31, 2006. Although non-deductible items have increased, non-deductible items as a percentage of pre-tax income have decreased due to an increase in pre-tax income. In addition, the effective tax rate decreased during the six month ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last year due to the reassessment of various tax reserves in both periods.

180

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2006 compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2005

Operating Revenues

Total operating revenues in fiscal 2006 increased by 10.0% to $1.26 billion, versus $1.15 billion in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to growth in international service revenues and data processing fees.

Operating revenues from Visa AP were $478.9 million and $402.8 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The increase of $76.1 million, or 18.9%, was primarily driven by growth of 16% and 11% in payments volume and the number of transactions processed, respectively, and the positive impact of pricing increases implemented by Visa AP in the second half of fiscal 2005. These factors were partially offset by an increase of $74.4 million in member incentives, as well as lower levels of other revenue from member-funded advertising and regional development programs.

Operating revenues from Visa LAC were $225.5 million and $209.7 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The increase of $15.8 million, or 7.5%, was primarily due to a $13.0 million increase in other revenues which was generated from increased fees from members related to regional advertising. In addition, the increase in operating revenue reflects growth in both payments volume and the number of transactions processed of 29% and 19%, respectively. However, the positive impacts from these factors were mainly offset by a $41.8 million increase in member incentives in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005.

Operating revenues from Visa CEMEA were $189.3 million and $156.7 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The increase of $32.6 million, or 20.8%, was driven by growth of 35% and 51% in payments volume and the number of transactions processed, respectively. These factors were partially offset by a $4.6 million increase in member incentives.

Operating revenues from VWS, excluding intercompany fees from Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA and other reconciling items totaling $57.9 million and $61.8 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, were $368.8 million and $378.2 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The decrease in operating revenue of $9.4 million, or 2.5%, is due to a $19.1 million decline in service fees from the incorporated regional group members, partially offset by a 9.7% increase in revenue from foreign currency exchange activities in connection with the settlement of multi-currency transactions, driven by higher foreign currency transaction volume.

The following table reflects the components of operating revenues for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005:

					2006 vs. 2005
Years Ended September 30,	2006		2005		$ Change		% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Service fees	$	455,301	$	453,633	$	1,668	0.4	%
International service revenues		427,232		359,075		68,157	19.0	%
Data processing fees		245,319		206,489		38,830	18.8	%
Other revenues		134,703		128,233		6,470	5.0	%
Total operating revenues	$	1,262,555	$	1,147,430	$	115,125	10.0	%

Service fees—The following table provides information with respect to service fees for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005:

							2006 vs. 2005
Years Ended September 30,	2006			2005			$ Change			% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Gross service fees—members of Visa AP, LAC and CEMEA	$	473,929		$	332,005		$	141,924		42.7	%
Incentives—members of Visa AP, LAC and CEMEA		(300,139	)		(178,953	)		(121,186	)	67.7	%
Service fees—incorporated regions		281,511			300,581			(19,070	)	(6.3	)%
Total service fees	$	455,301		$	453,633		$	1,668		0.4	%

181

Gross service fees from members of the unincorporated regions increased 42.7%, reflecting growth in payments volumes at the three unincorporated regions and pricing increases at Visa AP. Payments volume growth across the three regions was approximately 19% in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. On an individual basis, payments volume growth was 35%, 29%, and 16% at Visa CEMEA, Visa LAC, and Visa AP, respectively, in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Pricing increases in Visa AP, which became effective in the second half of fiscal 2005, had a positive impact on fiscal 2006 service fees of approximately $78.9 million as compared to fiscal 2005.

The growth in service fees attributable to these factors was largely offset by higher member incentives. Member incentives increased approximately $121.2 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Of this increase, $73.6 million is related to new pricing strategies implemented in Visa AP in late fiscal 2005. Member incentives also increased $41.8 million in Visa LAC, primarily reflecting an increase for an incentive program that rewarded Visa LAC members for achieving targets related to certain product lines and volumes.

Of the total services fees, $281.5 million and $300.6 million were earned from the incorporated regional group members in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. This $19.1 million decrease is primarily due to fee waivers provided to the incorporated regional group members in fiscal 2006 to help mitigate costs associated with a technical problem with payment cards introduced in September 2005 which included a holographic magnetic strip on the back of the card.

International service revenues—The increase in international service revenues in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005 was due primarily to growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions, driven by continued expansion in the usage of Visa-branded products for international travel purposes, as well as higher levels of international travel in general. In addition, pricing increases at Visa AP had a positive impact on international service revenues of approximately $19.8 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions across the three unincorporated regions was 13% in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. On an individual basis, growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions 22%, 16% and 9% in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005 at Visa CEMEA, Visa LAC and Visa AP, respectively, in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. International service revenues in fiscal 2006 as compared to the prior fiscal year increased $40.5 million and $15.5 million in Visa AP and Visa CEMEA, respectively, reflecting growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions, in addition to the impact of the revised pricing structures in Visa AP.

Data processing fees—The increase in data processing fees in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005 was driven by combined growth in the number of transactions processed across all three regions of 17%, as well as pricing increases at Visa AP. Growth in the number of transactions reflects an increase in the numbers of cards issued and products for targeted markets, including payments with low monetary values. On an individual basis, growth in the number of transactions processed was 51%, 19% and 11% in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005 at Visa CEMEA, Visa LAC and Visa AP, respectively, in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. The strongest revenue growth occurred in Visa AP and Visa CEMEA, which experienced an increase in data processing fees of $23.0 million and $9.1 million, respectively, in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. In addition to incremental revenue from growth in the number of transactions processed, Visa AP benefited from $13.7 million of increased revenue due to revised pricing structures implemented in the second half of fiscal 2005.

Of the total data processing fees, $4.9 million and $4.5 million were earned from the incorporated regional group members in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively.

Other revenues—The increase in other revenues in fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005 was primarily due to higher fees earned in connection with licensing and card manufacturer certifications, along with higher card recovery bulletin fees, primarily in Visa AP and Visa LAC. Modifications to member-funded regional development and advertising programs resulted in a revenue decline of $15.2 million in Visa AP, partially offset by an increase of $13.0 million in Visa LAC. Member-funded regional development and advertising programs are approved by the respective unincorporated region’s regional board of directors and may be terminated when it is believed that the objectives of a program have been achieved.

182

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses in fiscal 2006 increased by $196.3 million, or 18.8%, as compared to fiscal 2005. Year-over-year spending for advertising and promotion increased by $58.9 million in fiscal 2006, which was primarily due to a $44.3 million increase at Visa LAC. Operating expenses in fiscal 2005 benefited from a reduction of $44.6 million in the value of the settlement risk guarantee obligation in the Visa International consolidated balance sheet, as a result of Visa’s low loss history and sustained performance under its global risk policies and procedures, and other factors. Of this amount, $33.1 million was recorded at VWS. Affiliate services increased approximately $28.6 million in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. In addition, spending was higher in fiscal 2006 due to strategic organizational and governance activities, which added $13.8 million to professional and consulting services in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005, $8.9 million of which was recorded by VWS.

Operating expenses at Visa AP, excluding intercompany allocations from VWS totaling $44.6 million and $49.6 million in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, were $385.8 million and $352.3 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The increase in operating expenses of $33.5 million, or 9.5%, was partially due to a $10.1 million increase in personnel expense, driven by an increase in headcount. In addition, other expenses increased $10.2 million, primarily due to a $5.8 million write-off of a prepaid member incentive as a result of the decision to terminate an incentive program at the end of fiscal 2006, and $2.0 million for costs related to a technical problem with payment cards introduced in September 2005 which incorporated a holographic magnetic stripe on the back of the card.

Operating expenses at Visa LAC, excluding intercompany allocations from VWS totaling $10.6 million and $11.0 million in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, were $250.5 million and $167.5 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The increase in operating expenses of $83.0 million, or 49.6%, was primarily due to a $44.3 million increase in advertising, specifically for production, media and sponsorships, as well as increased spending related to an increase in contributions by members to a regional advertising fund. In addition, the increase in operating expense reflects higher personnel expense of $11.5 million driven by an increase in headcount, and an increase due to the reduction of settlement risk guarantee expense in fiscal 2005.

Operating expenses at Visa CEMEA, excluding intercompany allocations from VWS totaling $4.8 million and $4.7 million in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, were $179.2 million and $144.0 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The increase in operating expenses of $35.2 million, or 24.4%, was primarily due to an $11.2 million increase in advertising and promotion expense, an increase in headcount which drove a $6.0 million increase in personnel expense, a $4.6 million increase in other expense, and an increase due to the reduction of settlement risk guarantee expense in fiscal 2005.

Operating expenses at VWS, including other reconciling items totaling $12.5 million and $18.0 million in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, were $426.6 million and $382.0 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The increase in operating expenses of $44.6 million, or 11.7%, was primarily due to a reduction of settlement risk guarantee expense in fiscal 2005, and an increase in affiliates services expense in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. The increase in affiliates services was driven by higher volume of transactions processed and higher charges for network and payment application enhancements, as well as the impact of an $8.4 million non-recurring pricing related settlement from Inovant which reduced expenses in fiscal 2005. In addition, professional and consulting expense increased by $11.0 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005, of which $8.9 million was related to strategic organizational and governance activities. The increase in operating expense was partially offset by lower personnel expense of $19.8 million, primarily driven by a decrease in severance expense.

183

The following table reflects the components of operating expenses for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005:

							2006 vs. 2005
Years Ended September 30,	2006			2005			$ Change		% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Personnel	$	317,003		$	309,219		$	7,784	2.5	%
Affiliates services		212,144			183,511			28,633	15.6	%
Premises, equipment and software		105,245			104,130			1,115	1.1	%
Communications		33,423			31,833			1,590	5.0	%
Professional and consulting services		119,004			98,721			20,283	20.5	%
Advertising and promotion		343,922			284,973			58,949	20.7	%
Travel and meetings		59,275			45,530			13,745	30.2	%
Other expenses		52,243			32,514			19,729	60.7	%
Settlement risk guarantee		(150	)		(44,602	)		44,452	(99.7	)%
Total operating expenses	$	1,242,109		$	1,045,829		$	196,280	18.8	%

Personnel—The increase in personnel expense in fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005 primarily reflects increases in salaries due to annual merit increases and increased employee headcount, which combined added $9.7 million to expense in fiscal 2006. Expenses for employee incentives increased $8.9 million, primarily due to a 10% increase in employee headcount at the three unincorporated regions and favorable goal achievements and positive corporate results for fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Benefits expense increased $4.0 million, primarily due to increased staffing. These increases in personnel expenses were partially offset by a $13.5 million decrease in severance expenses, primarily at VWS, as a result of fewer terminations in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. Personnel expense at VWS decreased $19.8 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to the prior fiscal year, while expenses at Visa LAC, Visa AP and Visa CEMEA increased $11.5 million, $10.1 million and $6.0 million, respectively. The increase at the three unincorporated regions reflects the expansion of Visa International’s business and the growth of its membership base.

Affiliates services—Affiliates services expense consists primarily of fees paid to Inovant for transaction processing and other services related to system development in support of Visa branded products and services. In addition, affiliates services expense includes fees paid to Visa U.S.A. and Visa Europe for certain shared projects and, to a lesser extent, shared corporate services provided by Visa U.S.A. The increase in affiliates services expense in fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005 was driven by growth in the number of transactions processed as well as higher charges for network and payment application enhancements at the three unincorporated regions. In addition, affiliates services expense in fiscal 2005 benefited from an expense reduction for a non-recurring pricing related settlement of $12.3 million from Inovant, $8.4 million of which was recorded by VWS.

Professional and consulting services—The increase in professional and consulting services in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005 was partially attributable to a $13.8 million increase in expenses incurred in connection with strategic organizational and governance matters, including increases of $8.9 million and $2.8 million at VWS and Visa LAC, respectively. In addition, legal costs related to litigation and other legal matters increased by $12.0 million at VWS, primarily due to litigation involving American Express/Discover, Cryptography Research, Inc. and Interchange.

Advertising and promotion—The increase in advertising and promotion expense in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005 was primarily due to higher spending on marketing activities by Visa LAC. Advertising and promotion expenses in Visa LAC increased $44.3 million, or 74.3%, due primarily to spending on advertising campaigns in Mexico, Brazil and Chile. Additionally, spending in connection with the 2006 Winter Olympics in Torino, Italy contributed to $8.0 million of the increase in fiscal 2006, primarily at VWS and Visa AP.

Travel and meetings—Travel and meetings expense consists of costs related to employee travel as well as board of directors and other regional member meetings. The increase in travel and meetings expense in fiscal

184

2006 over fiscal 2005 was primarily attributable to higher costs associated with the international and regional boards of directors meetings during the 2006 Winter Olympics in Italy, as well as a higher frequency of board of directors meetings in 2006 for strategic organizational and governance matters.

Other expenses—Other expenses include product enhancements, member reimbursements, and general office and administrative costs. The increase in other expenses in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 was primarily due to $6.6 million of reimbursements to members and third parties in fiscal 2006 related to a technical problem with payment cards introduced in September 2005 which incorporated a holographic magnetic stripe on the back of the card. This expense was incurred across the three geographic regions. In addition, $5.8 million of prepaid expense was written off in Visa AP as a result of the decision to terminate a member incentive program.

Settlement risk guarantee—Settlement risk guarantee expense consists of changes in the estimated fair value of the settlement risk guarantee. Under Visa International’s current corporate bylaws, Visa International indemnifies members for settlement losses suffered due to the failure of any other member to honor Visa branded cards and travelers cheques in accordance with Visa International’s Operating Regulations. Visa International’s indemnification with respect to members’ settlement losses creates settlement risk for Visa International, due to the difference in timing between the date of a payment transaction and the date of subsequent settlement. The term and amount of the indemnification are unlimited. Settlement losses are initially borne by Visa International and may subsequently be recovered from the region where the defaulting member has its principal place of business.

The fair value of the settlement risk guarantee is estimated using a proprietary model. Key inputs to the model include statistically derived loss factors based on historical experience, estimated settlement exposures at period end and a standardized grading process for members and country exposures. The model is reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to capture recent characteristics of the membership, historical loss experience, and changes in Visa International’s global risk policies and procedures.

During fiscal 2005, as a result of Visa International’s management’s review of the loss model, a $44.6 million reduction in the settlement risk guarantee obligation was recorded with a corresponding reduction to expense. Specifically, the historical loss factors utilized in the model were reduced as a result of Visa International’s low loss history and sustained performance under its global risk policies and procedures. Furthermore, management concluded that it had experienced sufficient economic cycles, loss events and economic incidents to utilize the updated loss factors in its fair value determination, thereby resulting in the reduction in the fair value of the guarantee obligation. In fiscal 2006, the evaluation of settlement risk resulted in a $0.2 million reduction in the settlement risk guarantee.

Non-Operating Income, Net, and Provision for Income Taxes

Non-operating income, net, and provision for income taxes in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 were as follows:

					2006 vs. 2005
Years Ended September 30,	2006		2005		$ Change			% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Non-operating income, net	$	78,511	$	40,469	$	38,042		94.0	%
Provision for income taxes	$	29,202	$	58,869	$	(29,667	)	(50.4	)%

Non-operating income, net—The increase in non-operating income, net, in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005 was primarily due to a $20.9 million increase in dividend income from strategic investments at Visa LAC, as well as higher interest income of $12.0 million from the VWS short-term investment portfolio. The increase in interest income is due to higher market interest rates and higher balances of short-term investments in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005.

Provision for income taxes—The decrease in the provision for income taxes in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005 was due to a decrease in pre-tax income of $43.1 million and a decrease in the effective tax rate from 41.4% in fiscal 2005 to 29.5% in fiscal 2006. The decrease in the effective tax rate is attributable to a favorable partial

185

resolution of a California audit and the reassessment of federal tax reserves, partially offset by certain non-deductible expenditures incurred in connection with various strategic organizational matters.

The field work for the California audit was completed in fiscal 2006. However, Visa International plans to resolve the remaining issues via the Settlement Bureau of the Franchise Tax Board. The reassessment of federal tax reserves represents an ongoing process of monitoring income tax contingencies which may result in both increases and decreases to the effective tax rate.

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2005 compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 20, 2004

Impact of Visa EU Region on Year Ended September 30, 2004

Visa Europe became an incorporated regional group member of Visa International on July 1, 2004. Prior to that date, the European Union, or EU, region was an operating segment of Visa International. Accordingly, Visa International’s consolidated financial statements include results from the EU region for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. For the purposes of discussing and analyzing Visa International’s results of operations for fiscal 2004 on a comparable basis to fiscal 2005, the following table and the tables below reflect operating results adjusted to exclude the EU region’s results. This non-GAAP financial information has been included because management of Visa International believes such information provides readers a more transparent understanding of Visa International’s financial results and trends of its continuing operations. It further allows comparison of the financial results for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 of Visa International continuing operations on a consistent basis. This non-GAAP financial information should not be viewed as alternatives to the comparable U.S. GAAP measures and should be considered in addition to, but not as substitutes for, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures.

	2005			2004
Years Ended September 30,	Actual			Actual		EU Region1			Adjusted
	(in thousands)
						(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Operating Revenues
Service fees	$	453,633		$	471,175	$	29,618	2	$	500,793
International service revenues		359,075			423,913		(122,778	)		301,135
Data processing fees		206,489			322,791		(143,418	)		179,373
Other revenues		128,233			193,910		(54,024	)		139,886
Total operating revenues		1,147,430			1,411,789		(290,602	)		1,121,187
Operating Expenses
Personnel		309,219			392,906		(77,814	)		315,092
Affiliates services		183,511			245,543		(37,429	)		208,114
Premises, equipment and software		104,130			140,837		(41,399	)		99,438
Communications		31,833			52,318		(15,903	)		36,415
Professional and consulting services		98,721			124,552		(29,050	)		95,502
Advertising and promotion		284,973			297,989		(51,925	)		246,064
Travel and meetings		45,530			52,564		(13,018	)		39,546
Other expenses		32,514			50,130		(17,324	)		32,806
Settlement risk guarantee		(44,602	)		95		—			95
Total operating expenses		1,045,829			1,356,934		(283,862	)		1,073,072
Operating income		101,601			54,855		(6,740	)		48,115
Non-operating income, net		40,469			12,852		4,477			17,329
Income before provision for income taxes		142,070			67,707		(2,263	)		65,444
Provision for income taxes		58,869			35,418		(2,323	)		33,095
Net income	$	83,201		$	32,289	$	60		$	32,349

¹ The EU region column includes the nine-month period ended June 30, 2004 prior to the EU region’s incorporation.

² Consists of intercompany service fees earned by VWS partially offset by service fees paid by members of the EU region.

186

Summary of Financial Results

Net income in fiscal 2005 was $83.2 million, an increase of $50.9 million from fiscal 2004. Operating income in fiscal 2005 increased by $53.5 million, or 111.2%, as compared to the prior fiscal year, as a result of a 2.3% increase in operating revenue and a 2.5% decrease in operating expenses.

• Operating revenues in fiscal 2005 were $1.15 billion, an increase of $26.2 million, or 2.3%, over fiscal 2004. Higher revenues in fiscal 2005 associated with growth in payments volume, the monetary value of cross-border transactions, and the number of transactions, as well as the positive impact of pricing increases, were offset partially by higher levels of member incentives as compared to the prior fiscal year.

• Operating expenses in fiscal 2005 were $1.05 billion, a decrease of $27.2 million, or 2.5%, over fiscal 2004. Operating expenses in fiscal 2005 benefited from a reduction of $44.6 million in the value of the settlement risk guarantee obligation in the Visa International consolidated balance sheet, as a result of Visa’s low loss history and sustained performance under its global risk policies and procedures, and other factors. This decrease in expense was partially offset by a $38.9 million increase in advertising and promotion.

• Non-operating income, net, in fiscal 2005 was $40.5 million, an increase of $23.1 million, or 133.5%, compared to fiscal 2004. This increase reflects growth in interest income from short-term investments and higher dividend income from strategic investments, as well as a reduction in interest expense.

Operating Revenues

Total operating revenues in fiscal 2005 increased by 2.3% to $1.15 billion, compared to $1.12 billion in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to growth in international service revenues and data processing fees, partially offset by a decline in service fees.

Operating revenues from Visa AP were $402.8 million and $369.1 million for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively. The increase of $33.7 million, or 9.1%, was primarily driven by growth in payments volume and the number of transactions processed of 14% and 11%, respectively, and includes $57.6 million from the positive impact of pricing increases implemented in the second half of fiscal 2005. These factors were partially offset by an increase of $68.4 million in member incentives, and lower levels of other revenue from member-funded advertising and regional development programs.

Operating revenues from Visa LAC were $209.7 million and $189.3 million for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively. The increase of $20.4 million, or 10.8%, was primarily driven by growth in payments volume and the number of transactions processed of 30% and 21%, respectively. These factors were partially offset by a $20.6 million increase in member incentives.

Operating revenues from Visa CEMEA were $156.7 million and $149.8 million for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively. The increase of $6.9 million, or 4.6%, includes the impact of reduced revenue due to the October 2004 transfer to Visa Europe of member banks from eight countries previously included in Visa CEMEA. Excluding the impact of the loss of banks from these eight countries, payments volume growth and growth in the number of transactions processed were 33% and 47%, respectively. Fiscal 2005 operating revenue from Visa CEMEA also benefited by $13.0 million as a result of pricing increases.

Operating revenues from VWS, excluding intercompany fees from Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA, and other reconciling items totaling $61.8 million and $66.0 million for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 (excluding results of EU region), respectively, were $378.2 million and $413.0 million for fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease in operating revenues of $34.8 million, or 8.4%, is due to a $41.4 million decline in service fees from the incorporated regions, partially offset by a 10.9% increase in revenue from currency exchange activities in connection with the settlement of multi-currency transactions. The decline in fees from the incorporated regions is attributable to cost containment efforts at VWS and a decline in fees for central systems development.

187

The following table reflects the components of Visa International’s operating revenues for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 (excluding the EU region):

			Adjusted 20041		2005 vs. 2004
Years Ended September 30,	2005				$ Change			% Change
			(unaudited)
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Service fees	$	453,633	$	500,793	$	(47,160	)	(9.4	)%
International service revenues		359,075		301,135		57,940		19.2	%
Data processing fees		206,489		179,373		27,116		15.1	%
Other revenues		128,233		139,886		(11,653	)	(8.3	)%
Total operating revenues	$	1,147,430	$	1,121,187	$	26,243		2.3	%

¹ Adjusted to exclude results of EU region.

The table above and the following discussion of operating revenues excludes fiscal 2004 operating revenues of the EU region in order to focus on trends that have a recurring impact on Visa International’s results of operations.

Service fees—The following table provides information with respect to service fees for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004:

	Adjusted						2005 vs. 2004
Years Ended September 30,	2005			20041			$ Change			% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Gross service fees—members of Visa AP, LAC and CEMEA	$	332,005		$	251,371		$	80,634		32.1	%
Incentives—members of Visa AP, LAC and CEMEA		(178,953	)		(92,598	)		(86,355	)	93.3	%
Services fees—incorporated regions		300,581			342,020			(41,439	)	(12.1	)%
Total service fees	$	453,633		$	500,793		$	(47,160	)	(9.4	)%

¹ Adjusted to exclude results of EU region.

Gross service fees from members of the unincorporated regions increased 32.1%, reflecting growth in payments volume at the three unincorporated regions and pricing increases at Visa AP and Visa CEMEA, offset partially by lower service fees of approximately $6.9 million due to the migration of member banks from eight countries previously included in Visa CEMEA to Visa Europe in October 2004. Excluding the impact of the migration of member banks from Visa CEMEA to Visa Europe, payments volume growth across the three unincorporated regions was approximately 17% in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. On an individual basis, payments volume growth was 30% and 14% at Visa LAC and Visa AP, respectively, in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. Excluding the impact of the migration of member banks from Visa CEMEA to Visa Europe, payments volume growth in Visa CEMEA was 33% in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. In addition, service fees in fiscal 2005 benefited favorably by approximately $36.3 million from pricing increases, including $24.7 million from Visa AP.

The growth in service fees attributable to these factors was largely offset by an $86.4 million increase in member incentives in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. Member incentives in Visa AP increased $67.7 million, $37.4 million of which is related to the new pricing structure implemented in Visa AP in the second half of fiscal 2005. The balance of the increase in member incentives in Visa AP is attributable to members’ achievement of milestones under other performance-specific incentive agreements. Member incentives in Visa LAC increased $20.6 million due primarily to a program implemented in fiscal 2005 that rewarded members for the achievement of specified performance levels.

188

Of the total service fees, $300.6 million and $342.0 million were earned from the incorporated regional group members in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively. This $41.4 million decrease reflects expense containment efforts at VWS and lower fees charged by VWS for central systems development.

International service revenues—The increase in international service revenues in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 was due to growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions, driven by higher levels of international travel resulting from improved global economies and easing of terrorist threats, as well as growth in the usage of Visa-branded products for international travel purposes. Excluding the impact of the migration of member banks from Visa CEMEA to Visa Europe, the monetary value of cross-border transactions increased approximately 21% across the three regions in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. On an individual basis, growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions was 29% and 16% in Visa LAC and Visa AP, respectively, in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004. Excluding the impact of the migration of member banks from Visa CEMEA to Visa Europe, the monetary value of cross-border transactions grew 27% in Visa CEMEA in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. The impact from growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions was partially offset by $12.5 million of lower revenue resulting from the migration of member banks from Visa CEMEA to Visa Europe in October 2004. International service revenues in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 increased $41.0 million at Visa AP and $8.1 million at Visa LAC, driven by growth in the monetary value of cross-border transactions.

Data processing fees—The increase in data processing fees in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 was due to combined growth in the number of transactions processed, arising from growth in the number of cards issued and from new services and products for targeted markets. Excluding the impact of the migration of member banks from Visa CEMEA to Visa Europe, the number of transactions processed increased approximately 17% across the three regions in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. On an individual basis, growth in the numbers of transactions processed was 21% and 11% in Visa LAC and Visa AP, respectively, in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004. Excluding the impact of the migration of member banks from Visa CEMEA to Visa Europe, the number of transactions processed grew 47% in Visa CEMEA in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. Revised pricing structures in Visa AP and Visa CEMEA had a positive impact on data processing fees of approximately $17.3 million in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004, comprised primarily of a $15.9 million increase in Visa AP. The revenue growth from an increase in the number of transactions processed was partially offset by $15.4 million of lower revenue resulting from the migration of member banks from Visa CEMEA to Visa Europe in October 2004. Data processing fees increased $24.8 million and $8.6 million at Visa AP and Visa LAC, respectively, in fiscal 2005 as compared to 2004, based on growth in the number of transactions processed as well as the pricing impact in Visa AP.

Of the total data processing fees, $4.5 million and $2.8 million were earned from the incorporated regional group members in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively.

Other revenues—The decline in other revenues in fiscal 2005 from fiscal 2004 was primarily due to modifications to member funded advertising and regional development programs, primarily in Visa AP, which resulted in a net reduction in revenue of $10.9 million. Member-funded regional development and advertising programs are approved by the respective regional board of directors and may be terminated when it is believed that the objectives of the program have been achieved.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses in fiscal 2005 decreased by 2.5% to $1.05 billion, versus $1.07 billion in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to a reduction in expense of $44.6 million related to the evaluation of the settlement risk guarantee partially offset by an increase of $38.9 million in advertising and promotion expenses.

Operating expenses at Visa AP, excluding intercompany allocations from VWS totaling $49.6 million and $57.8 million in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively, were $352.3 million and $302.3 million in fiscal 2005

189

and 2004, respectively. The increase in operating expenses of $50.0 million, or 16.5%, was primarily due to higher advertising and promotion expenses across all major forms of consumer-oriented advertising, including billboards, television and print media.

Operating expenses at Visa LAC, excluding intercompany allocations from VWS totaling $11.0 million and $11.7 million in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively, were $167.5 million and $174.4 million in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses of $6.9 million, or 4.0%, was primarily due to a reduction in settlement risk guarantee expense in fiscal 2005, partially offset by a slight increase in advertising and promotion expense.

Operating expenses at Visa CEMEA, excluding intercompany allocations from VWS totaling $4.7 million and $4.9 million in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively, were $144.0 million and $141.0 million in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in operating expenses of $3.0 million, or 2.1%, was primarily due to an increase of $5.6 million in personnel expense, partially offset by a reduction in settlement risk guarantee expense in fiscal 2005.

Operating expenses at VWS, including other reconciling items totaling $18.0 million and $16.7 million in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively, were $382.0 million and $455.4 million in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses of $73.4 million, or 16.1%, was primarily due to a $33.1 million reduction in settlement risk guarantee expense in fiscal 2005, and a decrease of $11.2 million in personnel expense primarily resulting from reduced pension settlement losses in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004. In addition, affiliates service expense in fiscal 2005 benefited from an $8.4 million pricing related settlement from Inovant.

The following table reflects the components of Visa International operating expenses for fiscal 2005 and 2004, excluding the EU Region:

				Adjusted 20041		2005 vs. 2004
Years Ended September 30,	2005					$ Change			% Change
				(unaudited)
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Personnel	$	309,219		$	315,092	$	(5,873	)	(1.9	)%
Affiliates services		183,511			208,114		(24,603	)	(11.8	)%
Premises, equipment and software		104,130			99,438		4,692		4.7	%
Communications		31,833			36,415		(4,582	)	(12.6	)%
Professional and consulting services		98,721			95,502		3,219		3.4	%
Advertising and promotion		284,973			246,064		38,909		15.8	%
Travel and meetings		45,530			39,546		5,984		15.1	%
Other expenses		32,514			32,806		(292	)	(0.9	)%
Settlement risk guarantee		(44,602	)		95		(44,697	)	nm
Total operating expenses	$	1,045,829		$	1,073,072	$	(27,243	)	(2.5	)%

¹ Adjusted to exclude results of EU region.

nm—not meaningful

The table above and the following discussion of significant operating expenses excludes fiscal 2004 operating expenses of the EU region in order to focus on trends that have a recurring impact on Visa International’s results of operations.

Personnel—The decrease in personnel expense in fiscal 2005 from fiscal 2004 reflects a $13.6 million decrease in benefits primarily due to the combined effect of a $9.0 million reduction in pension expense and a $4.0 million reduction in payroll tax expense in Visa AP. The decline in pension expense was largely due to reduced pension settlement losses in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004, primarily at VWS. The decline in

190

payroll tax expense was attributable to favorable tax treatment related to U.S. expatriates working abroad. Employee incentives declined $2.4 million in fiscal 2005 compared to the prior fiscal year, offset by a comparable increase in salary expense attributable to annual merit increases.

Affiliates services—The decrease in affiliates services expense in fiscal 2005 from fiscal 2004 occurred primarily at VWS and was driven by lower charges for network and payment application enhancements. In addition, affiliates services expense in fiscal 2005 was reduced by $12.3 million due to a non-recurring pricing related settlement from Inovant, of which $8.4 million was recorded at VWS.

Premises, equipment and software—The increase in premises, equipment and software expense in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 was due to higher amortization expense resulting from software placed in service in late fiscal 2004 and early fiscal 2005, partially offset by lower depreciation expense for office furniture and equipment that became fully depreciated in late fiscal 2004 and early fiscal 2005.

Communications—The decrease in communications expense in fiscal 2005 from fiscal 2004 was a result of favorable contract renegotiations and more efficient configurations of telecommunications resources. In addition, fiscal 2004 expense included costs from running an analog network while also building out a digital network in Visa CEMEA. Communications in Visa CEMEA were fully converted to the new digital network in fiscal 2005.

Professional and consulting services—The increase in professional and consulting services in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 was due to:

• Higher product and marketing consulting expense of $11.5 million related to the revitalization of the Visa brand and various projects undertaken in connection with member initiatives across all regions;

• Higher legal expenses of $6.2 million related to various litigation cases, primarily at VWS; and

• Strategic corporate consulting and governance matters, which increased expenses by approximately $5.3 million, primarily at VWS.

This increase in professional and consulting services was partially offset by a $16.4 million reduction in expense at VWS primarily related to the completion in early fiscal 2005 of an authorization system and the subsequent transition of the project to Visa Europe. On a regional basis, an increase in professional and consulting services of $7.2 million at Visa AP, primarily due to higher expenses for strategic corporate consulting and governance, was partially offset by a decrease of $5.8 million at VWS, attributable to lower expenses for the development of an authorization system.

Advertising and promotion—The increase in advertising and promotion expense in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 was primarily due to:

• Increased spending of approximately $36.2 million for media, production and related activities in Visa AP, where expenses increased due to spending in certain markets such as China and Hong Kong, as well as television media and production spending for region-wide campaigns.

• Advertising spending related to the revitalization of the Visa brand, including production of point-of-sale materials, which increased expenses by approximately $7.0 million, including $5.5 million in Visa AP.

This increase in advertising and promotion expense was partially offset by lower spending of $3.6 million at VWS related to Visa’s sponsorship of the Olympics due to the completion of the Athens Olympics in 2004, partially offset by spending in fiscal 2005 for the 2006 Torino Olympics.

Travel and meetings—The increase in travel and meetings expense in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 was primarily due to an All-Board meeting that was held in fiscal 2005 in Beijing, China, which included regional and corporate board members from all Visa entities and regions. Such board of directors meetings for all Visa

191

entities and regions are usually held every two years. Additional travel expense was incurred in fiscal 2005 as a result of efforts to decentralize Visa CEMEA through the staffing of sub-regional offices, and in Visa AP in connection with marketing promotions and member meetings.

Settlement risk guarantee—In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, Visa International recorded a reduction to expense of $44.6 million resulting from the evaluation of the settlement risk guarantee. Under Visa International’s current corporate bylaws, Visa International indemnifies members for settlement losses suffered due to the failure of any other member to honor Visa cards and travelers cheques in accordance with Visa International’s operating regulations. Visa International’s indemnification with respect to members’ settlement losses creates settlement risk for Visa International, due to the difference in timing between the date of a payment transaction and the date of subsequent settlement. The term and amount of the indemnification are unlimited. Settlement losses are initially borne by Visa International and may subsequently be recovered from the region where the member has its principal place of business.

The fair value of the settlement risk guarantee is estimated using a proprietary model. Key inputs to the model include statistically derived loss factors based on historical experience, estimated settlement exposures at period end and a standardized grading process for members and country exposures. The model is reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to capture recent characteristics of the membership, historical loss experience, and changes in Visa International’s global risk policies and procedures.

During fiscal 2005, as a result of a review of the loss model, a $44.6 million reduction in the settlement risk guarantee obligation was recorded with a corresponding reduction to expense. Specifically, the historical loss factors utilized in the model were reduced as a result of Visa International’s low loss history and sustained performance under its global risk policies and procedures. Furthermore, management concluded that it had experienced sufficient economic cycles, loss events and economic incidents to utilize the updated loss factors in its fair value determination, thereby resulting in the reduction in the fair value of the guarantee obligation.

Non-Operating Income, Net, and Provision for Income Taxes

Non-operating income, net, and provision for income taxes in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 were as follows (excluding the EU region):

					2005 vs. 2004
Years Ended September 30,	2005		Adjusted 20041		$ Change		% Change
			(unaudited)
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Non-operating income, net	$	40,469	$	17,329	$	23,140	133.5	%
Provision for income taxes	$	58,869	$	33,095	$	25,774	77.9	%

¹ Adjusted to exclude results of the EU region

The table above and the following discussion of non-operating income, net, and the provision for income taxes excludes the EU region in order to focus on trends that have a recurring impact on Visa International’s results of operations.

Non-operating income, net—The increase in non operating income, net, in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 was due to higher interest income of $6.7 million at VWS, reflecting higher market interest rates and higher balances of short-term investments. Dividend income from strategic investments, primarily at Visa LAC, also increased $6.7 million in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004. In addition, interest expense in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 decreased primarily due to $6.6 million of expense incurred at VWS in fiscal 2004 in connection with the settlement of income tax audits. No comparable interest expense was incurred in connection with the settlement of income tax audits in fiscal 2005.

192

Provision for income taxes—The increase in the provision for income taxes in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 was due to an increase in pre-tax income of $76.6 million, partially offset by a decline in the effective tax rate to 41.4% in fiscal 2005 from 50.6% in fiscal 2004. The favorable decline in the effective tax rate is attributable to foreign tax refunds received and the favorable resolution of a federal income tax audit during fiscal 2005, partially offset by the expected result of a California tax audit.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary

Visa International’s primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, a fixed income investment portfolio comprised of highly rated short-term debt instruments with original maturities of 90 days or less, cash flow from operations and access to various borrowing arrangements. At March 31, 2007, Visa International had cash and cash equivalents of $604.4 million, no outstanding short-term borrowings, and long-term borrowings outstanding in an aggregate amount of $40.0 million. At September 30, 2006, Visa International had cash and cash equivalents of $705.8 million, no outstanding short-term borrowings, and long-term borrowings outstanding in an aggregate amount of $40.0 million. Borrowing arrangements available at March 31, 2007 included a $500.0 million U.S. commercial paper program, multi-currency revolving credit facilities totaling $2.25 billion, and a $250.0 million medium-term note program. Although Visa International is not subject to them, Visa International seeks to satisfy the liquidity standards published by the Bank for International Settlements for operators of net payment systems and to meet ongoing working capital requirements.

Visa International maintains a formal treasury policy approved by the audit, risk and finance committee of the Visa International board of directors that provides management with the guidelines and authority to manage liquidity risk in a manner consistent with corporate objectives. Management leads Visa International’s asset and liability committee, which oversees treasury activity, to ensure the approved policy is implemented and followed. The asset and liability committee establishes an annual liquidity target to ensure prudent liquidity resources are maintained. Short-term borrowings are executed when it is anticipated that liquid assets will fall below the annual liquidity target.

Settlement due from and due to members represents Visa International’s most consistent liquidity requirement, and arises primarily from the timing of settlement between member institutions with settlement currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The VWS treasury department manages the settlement of these multi-currency transactions. The settlement receivable and payable generally remain outstanding for two business days, consistent with standard market conventions for foreign currency transactions. Settlement receivable and payable balances vary according to the seasonal nature of international travel and worldwide holiday patterns. Typically, the highest seasonal liquidity demand is experienced in December and early January during the holiday shopping season. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, Visa International funded average daily net settlement receivable balances of $150.4 million, with the highest daily balance being $328.9 million. During fiscal 2006, Visa International funded average daily net settlement receivable balances of $109.4 million, with the highest daily balance being $297.9 million.

Visa International employs a methodology that measures capital relative to risk-based assets. The risk-based capital ratio calculation uses a risk-weighting framework similar to that issued by the Bank for International Settlements. The standard for risk-based capital includes a minimum target capital ratio of 8% of risk-based assets. Visa International’s off-balance sheet settlement risk guarantee represents the majority of the risk-weighted balance sheet. Visa International’s risk-based capital ratios at September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were 14.7%, 11.8% and 10.8%, respectively, which were above the minimum target capital level of 8%.

Management believes that cash provided by operating activities and borrowing capacity under credit facilities provides sufficient financial flexibility to meet Visa International’s working capital requirements and to fund capital expenditures, interest payments, scheduled debt repayment requirements, post-employment and

193

retirement benefits, and additional growth opportunities for the next twelve months. Management will continue to assess Visa International’s liquidity position and potential sources of supplemental liquidity in view of operating performance and other relevant circumstances. Visa International has certain off-balance sheet commitments and contingencies that may have significant future cash requirements. For additional information about commitments and contingent liabilities, see the discussion in “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations” below and in Note 19 to Visa International’s consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

The following table sets forth, as of the dates presented, summarized data from Visa International’s consolidated financial statements reflecting financial condition:

	March 31, 2007		September 30,
			2006		2005		2004
	(unaudited)		(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
Cash and balances on deposit with banks	$	74,191	$	57,505	$	75,966	$	68,434
Short-term investments		530,171		648,301		400,998		235,403
Total cash and cash equivalents	$	604,362	$	705,806	$	476,964	$	303,837
Trading assets	$	95,747	$	80,964	$	73,182	$	68,837
Investment securities, available-for-sale	$	1,526	$	1,210	$	9,267	$	110,069
Total current assets	$	1,726,543	$	1,705,691	$	1,468,835	$	1,474,357
Total current liabilities	$	1,180,698	$	1,315,511	$	1,148,174	$	1,263,854
Long-term debt	$	39,941	$	39,929	$	39,904	$	39,879
Total members’ equity	$	750,649	$	606,280	$	535,446	$	453,948
Working capital	$	545,845	$	390,180	$	320,661	$	210,503

Short term investments consist of investments in debt securities with original maturities of 90 days or less and money market mutual funds. At March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, investment securities available-for-sale consist of an investment in a marketable equity security which is carried at fair value. At September 30, 2005 and 2004, investment securities available-for-sale include an investment in a marketable equity security with a fair value of $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Investment securities available-for-sale as of September 30, 2005 and 2004 also include investments in short-term debt securities and time deposits with original maturities of 91 days or more.

Cash Flow Data

Visa International’s primary source of operating cash flows is the collection of cash from members related to their use of Visa International services, and non-operating income, including net interest income and dividends from strategic investments. Operating cash flows are also impacted by the level and the timing of the payment of member incentives. Typically, a net outflow of operating cash is experienced in the first fiscal quarter, resulting primarily from the payment of member incentives and employee performance incentives that were accrued at the end of the preceding fiscal year.

194

The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, data from Visa International’s consolidated financial statements reflecting cash flow activity:

	Six Months Ended March 31,					Years Ended September 30,
	2007			2006		2006			2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Cash Flow Data:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(99,784	)	$	36,388	$	245,395		$	110,502		$	(11,839	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	$	(1,660	)	$	4,377	$	(16,553	)	$	70,825		$	(77,726	)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(8,200	)	$	(5,000	)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(101,444	)	$	40,765	$	228,842		$	173,127		$	(94,565	)

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities increased $136.2 million during the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period of the prior year, reflecting the payment of higher levels of member incentives which were accrued at September 30, 2006, as compared to payments during the six months ended March 31, 2006 for member incentives which were accrued at September 30, 2005. Cash used for income tax payments also increased $75.6 million in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the six months of fiscal 2006. The increase in cash used for payment of member incentives and income taxes was partially offset by an increase in pre-tax income, reflecting operating revenue growth offset partially by an increase in operating expenses.

The $134.9 million increase in net cash provided by operations in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 is partially due to the timing of the accrual and payment of member incentives, which increased during fiscal 2006 and are generally deducted from revenue in advance of payment.

The $122.3 million increase in net cash provided by operations in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 primarily reflects higher levels of accrued liabilities, partially offset by increases in prepaid and other assets and higher funding of settlement amounts due from members.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased $6.0 million during the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase in the use of cash in investing activities reflects the absence of net proceeds from purchases and maturities of investment securities available-for-sale, which provided net $8.4 million of cash in the six months ended March 31, 2006. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, excess liquidity was maintained in cash and cash equivalent investments based on favorable interest rates as compared to longer-term investments.

The $87.4 million decrease in net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 reflects a shift of funds from the available-for-sale investment portfolio into cash equivalents that occurred in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2006, funds were maintained in short-term cash equivalents based on favorable investment yields and to maintain high levels of liquid assets consistent with liquidity targets.

The $148.6 million increase in net cash provided by investing activities in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 reflects cash provided from net maturities of available-for-sale investments in fiscal year 2005, compared to cash used for net purchases of available-for-sale investments in fiscal 2004. The increase in cash generated from available-for-sale investment activity in fiscal 2005 over fiscal 2004 was partially offset by $47.8 million of cash provided as result of the incorporation of the EU region in fiscal 2004.

Financing Activities

To ensure liquidity was available to fund multi-currency settlement operations while maintaining adequate levels of cash equivalents, short-term borrowings of $267.1 million were executed and repaid during the six

195

months ended March 31, 2007. This compares to short term borrowings and repayments of $919.7 million in the same period of 2006. The decline in borrowings in the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period of 2006 reflects higher available levels of cash and cash equivalents resulting in a reduced need to execute short-term borrowings.

To ensure liquidity was available to fund multi-currency settlement operations while maintaining adequate levels of cash equivalents, short-term borrowings of $1.1 billion were executed and repaid during fiscal 2006. This compares to short term borrowings and repayments of $2.2 billion in fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005, higher available levels of cash and cash equivalents resulted in higher levels of liquidity and contributed to the reduced need to execute short-term borrowings.

The utilization of cash in financing activities in fiscal 2005 was attributable to $8.2 million for the early redemption of preferred stock in September 2005, including a $1.2 million prepayment premium. In fiscal 2004, $5.0 million of cash was used in connection with the maturity of medium-term notes.

Sources of Liquidity

U.S. Commercial Paper Program

Visa International maintains a $500.0 million U.S. commercial paper program, which provides for the issuance of unsecured debt with maturities up to 270 days from the date of issuance at interest rates generally extended to companies with comparable credit ratings. The commercial paper program is Visa International’s primary source of short-term borrowed funds, and commercial paper is issued to cover short-term cash needs during peak settlement periods. At March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, Visa International had no obligations outstanding under this program.

Revolving Credit Facilities

Visa International maintains certain revolving credit facilities. The participating lenders in these revolving credit facilities include certain Visa International members or affiliates of Visa International members. These revolving credit facilities are maintained to provide liquidity in the event of settlement failures by Visa International members, to back up the commercial paper program and, in the case of the three-year facility, as described below, for general corporate purposes. There were no borrowings under these revolving credit facilities during the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 or during fiscal 2006 or fiscal 2005. Facility and other fees associated with the revolving credit facilities were $0.7 million and $0.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $1.5 million, $2.1 million, and $1.6 million for fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively.

The revolving credit facilities consisted of the following at March 31, 2007:

	Maximum Allowed Borrowing Under Credit Facility		Expiration Date
	(in thousands)
Three-year facility	$	300,000	October 2007
364-day facility	$	1,450,000	November 2007
Incremental facility	$	500,000	June 2007	*

* Under the terms of the 364-day credit agreement, Visa International may request up to three activations of an incremental facility up to a maximum principal amount of $500 million with a maximum expiration date of November 19, 2007. Once activated, the incremental facility is a committed credit facility until the expiration date granted by the lenders. At March 31, 2007, the commitments under the then-current incremental facility were to expire, and any loans thereunder mature, on June 15, 2007. On June 15, 2007, a new incremental facility maturing November 19, 2007 was activated. Following the activation on June 15, 2007, Visa International may make one additional incremental facility activation request until November 18, 2007.

196

Three-year facility. On October 7, 2004, Visa International entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders. The credit agreement, which is unsecured, provides for a committed $300 million three-year revolving credit facility. The commitments under the revolving credit facility expire, and any loans thereunder mature, on October 7, 2007. Advances under the three-year revolving credit facility are denominated in U.S. dollars. Outstanding balances under the three-year revolving credit facility bear interest at a floating rate, which is at the option of Visa International, either: (i) the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus a margin of between 0.17% and 0.28%, depending upon Visa International’s credit rating with Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., or Moody’s, and Standard and Poor’s Rating Service, or S&P; or (ii) an alternative base rate. Visa International must pay a quarterly facility fee on the total amount committed by the lenders. Visa International must also pay a quarterly utilization fee on the outstanding amount if borrowings under the facility exceed 50% of the total commitments. The facility and utilization fees range between 0.08% and 0.12% and 0.05% and 0.10%, respectively, depending on Visa International’s credit rating with Moody’s and S&P.

The three-year revolving credit facility contains certain covenants customary for financings of this type, including, without limitation, restrictions on: (i) indebtedness; (ii) the incurrence of liens; (iii) investments and acquisitions; (iv) mergers and the sale of assets; (v) transactions with affiliates; and (vi) a requirement to maintain consolidated accumulated net income of at least $300 million. The three-year revolving credit facility contains events of default customary for financings of this type, including, without limitation, failure to pay principal and interest in a timely manner, the breach of certain covenants, and judgments or orders for the payment of money in excess of $50 million on claims not covered by insurance that are rendered against Visa International or its subsidiaries. Visa International was in compliance with all covenants with respect to the three-year revolving credit facility as of March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006.

364-day and incremental facilities. On November 20, 2006, Visa International entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders. The credit agreement, which is unsecured, provides for a committed $1.45 billion 364-day revolving credit facility with a sub-limit for swing-line loans. The commitments under the 364-day revolving credit facility expire, and any loans thereunder mature, on November 19, 2007. If certain conditions are met, any outstanding amounts under the revolving credit facility as of November 19, 2007 may be converted into term loans. The 364-day facility is bifurcated into a $1.25 billion multi-currency tranche that can be denominated in any combination of U.S dollars, euro, British pounds sterling, yen or any other foreign currency in which the relevant lenders agree to make advances and a $200 million U.S. dollar tranche that can be denominated only in U.S. dollars. The swing-line loans are available as a sub-limit under the multi-currency tranche. In addition, under the terms of the credit agreement, Visa International may request up to three activations of an incremental facility up to a maximum principal amount of $500 million with a maximum expiration date of November 19, 2007. Following an activation request, the incremental facility may be made available upon fulfillment of certain conditions and receipt of further commitments from the lenders under the 364-day credit agreement. Once activated, the incremental facility is a committed credit facility until the expiration date granted by the lenders. At March 31, 2007, the commitments under the then-current incremental facility were to expire, and any loans thereunder mature, on June 15, 2007. On June 15, 2007, a new incremental facility maturing November 19, 2007 was activated. Following the activation on June 15, 2007, Visa International may make one additional incremental facility activation request until November 18, 2007.

Outstanding balances under the 364-day revolving credit facility and the incremental facility bear interest at a floating rate, which is at the option of Visa International, either: (i) the LIBOR rate plus a margin of between 0.16% and 0.22%, depending upon Visa International’s credit rating with Moody’s and S&P; or (ii) an alternative base rate. All base rate loans must be denominated in U.S. dollars. Visa International must pay a quarterly facility fee on the total amount committed by the lenders. Visa International must also pay a quarterly utilization fee on the outstanding amount if borrowings under the facility exceed 50% of the total commitments. The facility and utilization fees range between 0.04% and 0.8% and 0.05% and 0.10%, respectively, depending on Visa International’s credit rating with Moody’s and S&P.

The 364-day revolving credit facility and the incremental credit facility contain certain covenants customary for financings of this type, including, without limitation, restrictions on: (i) indebtedness; (ii) the incurrence of

197

liens; (iii) investments and acquisitions; (iv) mergers and the sale of assets; (v) transactions with affiliates; and (vi) a requirement to maintain consolidated accumulated net income of at least $400 million. In addition, there is a covenant that requires the prior written consent of the lenders for the proposed mergers of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada. These revolving credit facilities contain events of default customary for financings of this type, including, without limitation, failure to pay principal and interest in a timely manner, the breach of certain covenants, and judgments or orders for the payment of money in excess of $100 million on claims not covered by insurance that are rendered against Visa International or its subsidiaries. Visa International was in compliance with all covenants with respect to the 364 day revolving credit facility and the incremental facility as of March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006.

Uncommitted Credit Facility with Visa U.S.A.

Visa International has an uncommitted credit facility with Visa U.S.A. whereby the companies may provide each other short-term financing with a maximum term of five business days. Neither Visa International nor Visa U.S.A. has the obligation to lend to or to borrow from the other company. There were no outstanding balances as of March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 or September 30, 2005 under this arrangement.

Long-Term Debt

In March 1992, Visa International established a medium-term note program authorizing the issuance of a maximum $250.0 million of unsecured, private placement notes. The notes may be issued with maturities from nine months to 30 years at fixed or floating interest rates. No medium-term notes were issued during the six months ended March 31, 2007 or in fiscal 2006 or 2005. At March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, Visa International had notes outstanding in an aggregate amount of $40.0 million, which mature in August 2009 and have a fixed interest rate of 7.53%. Interest expense on the notes was $1.5 million in each of the six month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and $3.0 million, $3.0 million and $3.2 million in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively.

Credit Ratings

Visa International’s credit ratings are periodically reviewed by credit rating agencies and communicated to financial markets and investors. Maintaining investment grade credit ratings is an important part of Visa International’s overall management strategy as they serve to lower the cost of funds and to facilitate Visa International’s access to capital. The following table sets forth Visa International’s credit ratings as of March 31, 2007:

Debt Type		Standard & Poor’s	Moody’s
Long-term unsecured debt	Local	A	A1
	Foreign	A	A1
Short-term unsecured debt		A-1	P-1

In October 2006, following the announcement of the proposed mergers of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, Standard & Poor’s placed Visa International on credit watch with negative implications and Moody’s changed the outlook for Visa International from stable to negative.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Visa International’s off-balance sheet arrangements relate to contingent obligations, guarantees and variable interest entities.

Contingent Obligations

Visa International has contingent obligations related to incentive agreements with members and other organizations for various programs designed to build payments volume, increase card issuance and acceptance,

198

and increase other Visa branded transactions. These card, volume and support incentives are earned by members based on their performance over the term of the incentive agreement, which may range from one to seven years, and are recognized as a reduction of revenue in the same period as the related revenues are earned, based on management’s estimate of the members’ performance as compared to the terms of the incentive agreement. The agreements are generally cancellable by Visa International. Excluding anticipated revenue to be earned from growth in payments volume and the number of transactions processed in connection with these agreements, the expected reduction of future earnings in the next six years resulting from these agreements is estimated to be a maximum of $389.9 million as of March 31, 2007.

Guarantees

Under Visa International’s current corporate bylaws, Visa International indemnifies members for any settlement loss suffered due to the failure of any other member to honor Visa cards and travelers cheques processed in accordance with Visa International’s operating regulations. This indemnification is unlimited and is the result of the difference in timing between the date of a payment transaction and the date of subsequent settlement. To manage the settlement risk under this indemnification and the resulting risk to all members, a formalized set of credit standards has been approved by the Visa International board of directors. To reduce potential losses related to settlement risk, Visa International requires certain members to post collateral that may include cash equivalents, securities, letters of credit or guarantees in order to ensure their performance of settlement obligations. The exposure to settlement losses not covered by member collateral is accounted for as a settlement risk guarantee. The fair value of the settlement risk guarantee is estimated using a proprietary model. Key inputs to the model include statistically derived loss factors based on historical experience, estimated settlement exposures at period end and a standardized grading process for members and country exposures. The model is independently reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to capture recent characteristics of the membership, historical loss experience, and changes in Visa International’s global risk policies and procedures. The value of the settlement risk guarantee was $0.2 million at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006.

In October 2001, Visa International entered into a twenty-year lease agreement for premises to be occupied by the EU region and Visa CEMEA. On July 1, 2004, upon the incorporation of the EU region as VESI, a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa Europe, the entire lease was assigned to VESI with Visa International acting as a guarantor to the landlord as required by United Kingdom property law under the existing lease. In the event of a default by VESI, Visa International is obligated to make lease payments. The base rent commitment is £7.5 million each year or $14.7 million in U.S. dollars (based on the March 31, 2007 exchange rate). Rent is allocated based on the square footage occupied by the tenants and was 81.1% for VESI and 18.9% for Visa CEMEA at March 31, 2007. VESI has agreed to reimburse Visa International for any liabilities that may arise under Visa International’s guarantee to the landlord. Since the inception of this arrangement, Visa International has not made any payments under this guarantee. The estimated value of this guarantee was $0.2 million at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006.

Variable Interest Entities

At September 30, 2006, Visa International had investments in three companies that were identified as variable interest entities. Visa International was not the primary beneficiary of any of these entities and as such no consolidation was required, although it did have a significant variable interest in one entity. This entity is involved in the development of processing services for smart cards in Egypt. Visa International’s variable interests in this entity at September 30, 2006 consisted of an equity investment and a lease guarantee and were not material to Visa International’s consolidated financial statements. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, the lease guarantee was terminated and this, together with other transactions and events, led to a reconsideration of the status of the entity with the conclusion that it no longer satisfied the criteria of a variable interest entity.

199

Contractual Obligations

As of March 31, 2007, significant contractual obligations, including payments due by period, were as follows:

	Years Ending September 30,
Payments due by period	Total		2007 (remaining six months)		2008-2009		2010-2012		Thereafter
	(in thousands)
Long-term debt obligations	$	40,000	$	—	$	40,000	$	—	$	—
Interest on long-term debt		7,204		1,506		5,698		—		—
Operating lease obligations		73,469		9,184		18,025		12,361		33,899
Marketing and other obligations1		175,158		46,949		67,253		57,435		3,521
Total	$	295,831	$	57,639	$	130,976	$	69,796	$	37,420

¹ Consists of amounts associated with sponsorship agreements, advertising agreements, telecommunications services, and other commitments under non-cancelable agreements.

Visa International also has obligations with respect to pension and postretirement medical benefit plans. Visa International’s contributions to these benefit plans are expected to total $16.1 million in fiscal 2007. Refer to Note 10 to Visa International’s consolidated financial statements for the six month period ended March 31, 2007 and Note 14 to Visa International’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2006, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

In March 2006, Visa International entered into an eight-year agreement to sponsor the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, or FIFA, World Cup, commencing in January 2007. On December 6, 2006, a trial court in New York granted MasterCard Incorporated (Master Card) injunctive relief against FIFA, with the effect of awarding the FIFA sponsorship contemplated in the Visa-FIFA agreement to MasterCard instead. FIFA has appealed the court’s decision, which appeal is currently pending. Until this MasterCard-FIFA litigation is finally resolved or Visa International otherwise resolves the matter between itself and FIFA, Visa International’s rights and obligations under the Visa-FIFA agreement are not certain. The contractual payments under the agreement total $180.0 million over the eight-year term of the agreement and are payable in annual installments. The payment which was due in January 2007 has been temporarily delayed by agreement with FIFA. No related payments are included in the table above. Visa may realize financial and other remedies from FIFA in the event that FIFA is unable to perform under the Visa sponsorship agreement as a result of the MasterCard litigation.

Related Party Transactions

Visa International’s related parties include Visa U.S.A., which is a separately incorporated regional group member and has representation on the board of directors of Visa International. For the six months ended March 31, 2007 and during fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, revenue from Visa U.S.A. represented 10.2%, 12.8%, 14.9% and 14.1% of Visa International’s total operating revenues, respectively. No other member accounted for more than 10% of Visa International’s total operating revenues during the six months ended March 31, 2007 or fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004.

Inovant is a majority-owned subsidiary of Visa U.S.A., 16% of which is owned by Visa International. Inovant operates VisaNet, the processing system through which transaction processing and related services are offered to members of Visa International. For the six months ended March 31, 2007 and during fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, expenses to Inovant represented 14.8%, 16.9%, 17.5% and 17.8% of Visa International’s total operating expenses, respectively.

200

Visa International also maintains financial relationships and has credit facilities with certain members that have officers who also serve on Visa International’s board of directors and regional boards of directors. For further information about such financial relationships, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources-Sources of Liquidity.”

Seasonality

Visa International’s business is seasonal, reflecting international consumer travel patterns and increased consumer shopping during the holidays. Historically, the highest level of international travel occurs in the fourth fiscal quarter, ending September 30. Accordingly, the largest portion of international service revenues is earned in this quarter. This favorable increase in international service revenues may be more than offset by higher levels of member incentives in the fourth quarter, dependent on regional operating results for the full fiscal year. The first fiscal quarter, ending December 31, is generally the period of lowest operating expenditures. During this quarter, significant system development efforts are suspended in preparation for the holiday shopping season. This is also the quarter in which peak liquidity demands are experienced, particularly in late December during the holiday shopping season. Expenditures are higher after the second fiscal quarter, ending March 31, due to increased spending on advertising related to summer travel and systems development related to the following fiscal year’s holiday season.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Visa International’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In connection with the preparation of Visa International’s financial statements, Visa International’s management is required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and the related disclosures. These assumptions and estimates are based on judgments, historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time the consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that Visa International’s financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material to the financial statements of Visa International.

Visa International’s significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2006, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus. Visa International’s management believes that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating the reported financial results of Visa International, and they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Revenue Recognition
Agreements with certain members provide card, volume and support incentives which are based on estimates.	These agreements with members to provide incentives are recorded as reductions of revenue in the same period as the related revenues are earned, based on management’s estimate of the members’ performance in a given period according to provisions in the agreements. Customer performance is estimated by using member reported information,	If the members’ actual performance differs from Visa International’s estimates, the amounts recorded as reduction of revenue would be impacted.

201

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
	transactional information accumulated from Visa’s systems, historical information, and discussions with Visa International’s customers. These estimates are compared to actual performance in subsequent periods.
Impairment of Investments
The fair value of cost method and equity method investments is estimated if there have been identified events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments.	Identified events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments are evaluated based on management’s judgments. Among the factors considered by management are developments since the acquisition of the investment, the sales price of recently issued securities, the financial condition and operating results of the issuer, earnings trends and consistency of operating cash flows, the long-term business potential of the issuer and other factors generally pertinent to the valuation of investments.	There were no impairment charges in the six months ended March 31, 2007 or the year ended September 30, 2006. Impairment charges of $2.2 million and $5.3 million were recorded in the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The maximum exposure to changes in fair value estimates at March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 is represented by the book values of these investments, which were $71.6 million, $68.6 million and $57.1 million, respectively. If actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and judgments used in this methodology, Visa International may be exposed to impairment losses that could be material to the financial statements.
Capitalized Software
Capitalized software includes internal and external costs incurred in developing software for internal use. Capitalized software is evaluated for impairment, at a minimum, on an annual basis or when an event occurs or circumstances change which indicate the existence of a possible impairment.	Management conducts an impairment analysis by applying judgment in estimating whether each technology project will satisfy its intended function. If the carrying value exceeds the technology’s fair value, an impairment loss is recorded.	There were no impairment charges in the six months ended March 31, 2007 or the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004. At March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, the maximum exposure to changes in fair value estimates is represented by the book values of these intangible assets, which were $38.5 million, $47.4 million and $52.9 million, respectively.

202

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
		If actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and judgments used in this methodology, Visa International may be exposed to impairment losses that could be material to the financial statements.
Tax Contingencies
In calculating income tax expense or benefit, estimates and assumptions are made regarding certain tax positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In certain circumstances, a valuation allowance may be recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.	It is difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of the resolution of any particular tax matter. A number of years may lapse before a tax return containing various issues, for which reserves have been established, is audited and finally resolved. The calculation of reserves related to tax matters involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. As a result, management monitors the changes in these and other factors and adjusts the reserves and the effective tax rate on a timely basis if necessary.	Management believes that tax reserves reflect the probable outcomes of known contingencies. Although management may think that estimates and judgments discussed herein are reasonable, actual results may differ, which could be material to the financial statements of Visa International.
Settlement Risk Guarantee
The fair value of the settlement risk guarantee is based on estimates.	Management estimates the value of this guarantee using internal estimates of the probability of failure by each member, average settlement exposures, average number of days to settle and historical losses.	The resulting estimate of this settlement risk guarantee, after consideration of collateral held, was $0.2 million at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively, and $0.3 million at September 30, 2005. If actual results are not consistent with assumptions and judgments used in calculating the fair value, Visa International may be exposed to a fair value change that could be material to the financial statements.

203

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Legal and Regulatory Matters
Visa International is involved in a number of legal and regulatory actions, the outcomes of which are not within Visa International’s complete control or may not be known for prolonged periods of time.	In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” a liability is recorded in Visa International’s consolidated financial statements for legal and regulatory actions when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated, a liability is not recorded in the consolidated financial statements. In most cases, significant judgment is required to determine whether a loss is probable and to estimate the amount and timing of the loss to be recorded.	The outcome of these legal matters cannot be predicted with certainty. Significant changes in legal proceedings and/or the factors considered in the evaluation of those matters could have a material adverse effect on Visa International’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Pension
Pension assumptions are significant inputs to actuarial models that measure pension benefit obligations and related effects on operations. Two critical assumptions—discount rate and expected return on assets—are important elements of plan expense and asset/liability measurements. These critical assumptions are evaluated at least annually on a plan basis. Other assumptions involving demographic factors such as retirement age, mortality and turnover are evaluated periodically and are updated to reflect actual experience and expectations for the future. Actual results in any given year will often differ from actuarial assumptions because of economic and other factors, and, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the impact of these differences are accumulated and amortized over future periods.

204

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Visa International’s discount rate is based on matching the duration of other corporate bond pools that match the expected benefit payment stream. The discount rate enables the statement of expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases pension expense. Visa International relies on the advice and expertise of actuarial consultants when making these critical assumptions.	United States (U.S.) Plan To reflect market interest rate conditions in calculating the projected benefit obligation, the pension discount rate was increased from 5.3% at June 30, 2005 to 6.2% at June 30, 2006. United Kingdom (UK) Plan A discount rate of 5.0% was utilized at September 30, 2006 and 2005.	U.S. Plan A 25 basis point decrease or increase in the discount rate would increase or decrease annual pension expense, respectively, by $1.3 million. UK Plan A 25 basis point decrease or increase in the discount rate would increase or decrease annual pension expense, respectively, by $0.6 million.
To determine the expected rate of return on plan assets, Visa International considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as the long-term historical risks and returns associated with each asset class within the plan portfolio. A lower expected rate of return on plan assets increases pension cost.	U.S. Plan An expected rate of return of 7.5% was utilized at June 30, 2006 and 2005. UK Plan An expected rate of return of 7.0% was utilized at September 30, 2006 and 2005.	U.S. Plan A 25 basis point decrease or increase in the expected return on assets would increase or decrease pension expense, respectively, by $0.3 million. UK Plan A 25 basis point decrease or increase in the expected return on assets would increase or decrease pension expense, respectively, by $0.1 million.
Postretirement
Certain assumptions are used in the determination of annual postretirement costs. Key assumptions include the discount rate used to measure the plan’s projected benefit obligation and the projected increase in future healthcare costs. Visa International relies on the advice and expertise of actuarial consultants when making these critical assumptions.	To reflect market interest rate conditions in calculating the projected benefit obligation, the postretirement discount rate was increased from 5.0% at June 30, 2005 to 6.2% at June 30, 2006. The annual rate of future increase in per capita cost of health benefits was 7.0% in 2006. The rate is assumed to decrease to 6.0% by 2007 and remain at that level thereafter.	A 25 basis point decrease or increase in the discount rate would increase or decrease expense, respectively, by approximately $0.04 million. Increasing the health care cost trend by 1% would increase the postretirement accumulated plan benefit obligation by $0.2 million, and service and interest costs by approximately $0.1 million. Decreasing the health care cost trend by 1% would decrease the postretirement accumulated plan benefit obligation by $0.2 million, and service and interest costs by approximately $0.1 million.

205

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements and Standards

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FASB Interpretation No., or FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It establishes a probability threshold of greater than 50% to satisfy the requirement to recognize a tax benefit. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Visa International is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, or SFAS, No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Visa International is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” which amends SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 106 to require recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the balance sheet. Under SFAS No. 158, gains and losses, prior service costs and credits, and any remaining transition amounts that have not yet been recognized through net periodic benefit cost will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax effects, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic cost. In addition, the measurement date, the date at which the benefit obligation and plan assets are measured, is required to be the company’s fiscal year end. SFAS No. 158 is effective for non-public companies for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007, except for the measurement date provisions, which are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Visa International plans to adopt both the balance sheet recognition and measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158 at September 30, 2007, which represents an early adoption of the measurement date provision. Accordingly, for the balance sheet recognition provision with respect to Visa International’s portion of pension and post-retirement plans at September 30, 2007, the after-tax impact would reduce members’ equity by approximately $19.2 million and $11.4 million for the United States and United Kingdom plans, respectively, based on fiscal 2006 pension plan measurements. For the measurement date provision, for Visa International’s portion of the United States pension and post-retirement plans at September 30, 2007, Visa International will record an after-tax charge of approximately $2.8 million to members’ equity in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. The United Kingdom plans currently have measurement dates of September 30, so no change in measurement date is required for those plans. These estimates are actuarially calculated based on current assumptions for the plans, and assume that there will be no modifications, amendments or other significant changes to the plans. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” This statement allows entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and other items at fair value. In addition, SFAS No. 159 includes an amendment of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Visa International is evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 159 could have on its consolidated financial statements, if any.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk is the potential for economic losses from changes in market factors such as foreign currency exchange rates, credit, interest rates and equity prices.

206

Visa International is exposed to market risk related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices. Management establishes and oversees the implementation of policies, which have been approved by the Board of Directors, governing funding, investments and the use of derivative instruments. Visa International does not hold or enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Aggregate risk exposures are monitored on an ongoing basis, and cash and cash equivalents are not considered to be subject to interest rate risk due to the short period of time to maturity.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The business of Visa International is conducted globally. As such, Visa International is exposed to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Risks from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations are related primarily to adverse changes in the dollar value of revenues that are derived from foreign currency-denominated transactions, and to adverse changes in the dollar value of payments in foreign currencies, primarily for costs and expenses at Visa International’s non-U.S. locations.

These risks are managed by utilizing derivative foreign currency forward and option contracts, which we refer to as foreign currency contracts. Foreign currency contracts are primarily designated as hedges of operational cash flow exposures which result from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. At March 31, 2007, the currencies underlying the foreign currency contracts consist primarily of the British pound, Brazilian real, Australian dollar, Singapore dollar, Mexican peso, Japanese yen and South Korean won. The foreign currency exchange rate risk management program reduces, but does not entirely eliminate, the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements. Refer to Note 12 of Visa International’s consolidated financial statements for the six month period ended March 31, 2007 and Note 16 of Visa International’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2006, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus, for a further discussion of foreign currency exchange rate risk.

At March 31, 2007, foreign currency contract positions consisted of agreements to purchase foreign currencies in exchange for U.S. dollars, at notional amounts totaling $56.8 million, and agreements to sell foreign currencies in exchange for U.S. dollars, at notional amounts totaling $166.4 million. Based on these March 31, 2007 foreign currency contract positions, the effect of a hypothetical 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar is estimated to create an additional fair value loss of $3.3 million on the contracts to purchase foreign currency and an additional fair value gain of $8.1 million on the contracts to sell foreign currency. A hypothetical 10 percent weakening of the U.S. dollar is estimated to create an additional fair value gain of $3.6 million on the contracts to purchase foreign currency and an additional fair value loss of $6.1 million on the contracts to sell foreign currency. At March 31, 2007, the three largest concentrations of agreements to sell foreign currency consisted of contracts for the Brazilian real, Australian dollar and Mexican peso. Agreements to purchase foreign currencies at March 31, 2007 consisted solely of contracts for the British pound and Singapore dollar.

At September 30, 2006 and 2005, foreign currency contract positions consisted of agreements to purchase foreign currencies in exchange for U.S. dollars, at notional amounts of $54.5 million and $78.6 million, respectively. Based on these fiscal year-end 2006 and 2005 foreign currency contract positions, the effect of a hypothetical 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar is estimated to create an additional fair value loss of $5.3 million and $7.5 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Visa International is also subject to foreign currency exchange risk in daily settlement activities. This risk arises from the timing of rate setting for settlement with member institutions relative to the timing of market trades for balancing currency positions. The foreign currency exchange risk in settlement activities is limited through daily operating procedures, including the utilization of Visa settlement systems and Visa International’s interaction with foreign exchange trading counterparties.

207

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk occurs when the pricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities differ. Visa International is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through short-term interest bearing investments which may be included in available-for-sale securities, long-term debt and borrowing activities. Investments in fixed rate instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. The fair value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates. Additionally, a falling rate environment creates reinvestment risk because as securities mature the proceeds are reinvested at a lower rate, generating less interest income. Because Visa International has historically had the ability to hold short-term investments until maturity and the majority of Visa International’s investments mature within one year of purchase, operating results or cash flows have not been, and are not expected to be, materially impacted by a sudden change in market interest rates. Visa International’s asset and liability committee is responsible for managing any interest rate risk consistent with Visa International’s treasury policy requirements. Notwithstanding the efforts to manage interest rate risks, there can be no assurances that there will be adequate protection against the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations.

Visa International has various credit facilities to provide liquidity in the event of member settlement failures and other operational needs. These credit facilities have variable rates which are applied to borrowings based on terms and conditions set forth in each agreement. There were no amounts outstanding at March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 under these credit facilities. Visa International has fixed rate medium-term notes which are subject to interest rate risk. A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in rates would have resulted in an additional fair value loss estimated at $0.9 million, $1.1 million and $1.5 million as of March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively.

Equity Price Risk

Visa International maintains marketable equity securities and short-term money market investments that are used to fund certain vested and unvested executive compensation plans. These investments are classified as trading assets and are reported at fair value using quoted market prices, with an offsetting gain or loss recorded in non-operating income, net. In addition, the vested portion of the compensation liabilities is adjusted for changes in the fair value of the related trading account assets, with an offsetting amount recorded in personnel expense on the consolidated statements of operations. Visa International is thus exposed to equity price risk for the portion of the trading assets which are not related to vested compensation liabilities. At March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006, and September 30, 2005, the balances of trading assets were $95.7 million, $81.0 million and $73.2 million, respectively. At March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006, and September 30, 2005, the balances of vested compensation liabilities were $66.8 million, $70.4 million and $67.5 million, respectively. The effect of a hypothetical 10% decline in the market value of the trading asset portfolio would have resulted in a net fair value loss estimated at $2.9 million, $1.1 million and $0.6 million at March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively.

208

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA AND

STATISTICAL DATA OF VISA U.S.A.

The selected Visa U.S.A. consolidated statements of operations data and consolidated balance sheet data presented below as of and for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus. The selected Visa U.S.A. consolidated statements of operations data and consolidated balance sheet data presented below as of and for the years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included in this proxy statement-prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data presented below as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 have been derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus and, in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of Visa U.S.A.’s financial position and results of operations for such periods. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future and results for the six months ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of, and are not projections for, the results to be expected for the full year ending September 30, 2007.

Visa U.S.A. recorded a cumulative effect of accounting change in fiscal 2005 related to its membership interest in Visa International and in fiscal 2004 related to Visa U.S.A. changing its method of amortizing volume and support agreements. For further information regarding these accounting changes, see Note 3 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. These accounting changes resulted in additional net income of $95.7 million in fiscal 2005 and an additional net expense of $6.2 million in fiscal 2004. On January 1, 2003, Visa U.S.A. purchased Inovant, Inc. and subsequently formed Inovant, which affect the comparability of the financial data of Visa U.S.A. The operating results of Inovant were included in the consolidated statements of operations of Visa U.S.A. from January 1, 2003.

The selected statistical data tables present total payments volume, cash volume, total transactions, and total transaction messages. Visa U.S.A.’s members provide payments volume and cash volume information on their quarterly operating certificates, which are the bases used by Visa U.S.A. to charge card service fees. Payments volume and cash volume information is subject to verification by Visa U.S.A. From time to time, members may update previously submitted payments and cash volume information. Prior year payments and cash volume information presented in the table below has not been updated as changes made were not material. Payments volume excludes cash disbursements obtained with Visa-branded cards, balance transfers, and convenience checks. Total transactions data is provided by Visa U.S.A.’s members while total messages processed are provided by Visa U.S.A.’s transaction processing systems. The selected statistical data does not purport to indicate results of operations as of any future date or for any future period.

The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Visa U.S.A.” and the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

209

Selected Financial and Statistical Data

	Six Months Ended March 31,			Six Months Ended March 31,			Years Ended September 30,
	2007			2006			2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
	(Unaudited)						(in millions, except percentages)
Statements of Operations Data
Operating Revenues	$	1,658		$	1,467		$	2,948		$	2,665		$	2,429		$	1,980		$	1,564
Volume and Support Agreements		(234	)		(279	)		(588	)		(524	)		(466	)		(366	)		(311	)
Operating Expenses		1,078			1,119			2,219			2,212			1,999			3,398			1,478
Litigation Provision		15			49			23			132			37			1,500			—
Operating Income (Loss)		580			349			730			453			430			(1,418	)		86
Operating Income (Loss) as Percent of Operating Revenues		35.0	%		23.8	%		24.8	%		17.0	%		17.7	%		(71.6	%)		5.5	%
Other Income (Expense)		31			(5	)		(8	)		3			(75	)		(38	)		17
Income (Loss) Before Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle		385			213			455			265			216			(885	)		60
Net Income (Loss)		385			213			455			360			210			(885	)		60
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	386		$	177		$	270		$	135		$	174		$	86		$	46
Short-term Investment Securities, Available-for-Sale		1,026			722			660			681			156			253			143
Total Current Assets		2,041			1,509			1,594			1,478			920			867			552
Long-term Investment Securities, Available-for-Sale		355			512			515			319			378			85			9
Total Assets		3,252			2,928			2,964			2,745			2,294			1,905			876
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt1		26			32			32			32			32			174			—
Current Portion of Accrued Litigation2		238			342			216			197			244			201			—
Total Current Liabilities		1,263			1,444			1,393			1,325			1,070			988			410
Long-Term Debt1		32			58			41			74			106			—			—
Long-Term Accrued Litigation2		811			944			784			1,010			1,019			1,127			—
Total Equity (Deficit)		968			338			583			126			(230	)		(440	)		444
Statistical Data 3(unaudited)		(in millions, except percentages)
Credit	$	317,447		$	299,115		$	588,972		$	537,772		$	491,860		$	446,407		$	434,616
Percentage change		6.1	%		9.4	%		9.5	%		9.3	%		10.2	%		2.7	%		(2.1	%)
Debit		308,918			279,856			574,454			466,618			362,382			287,188			235,548
Percentage change		10.4	%		25.2	%		23.1	%		28.8	%		26.2	%		21.9	%		23.8	%
Commercial and Other		90,884			76,003			159,411			126,506			102,197			84,963			69,805
Percentage change		19.6	%		26.3	%		26.0	%		23.8	%		20.3	%		21.7	%		15.6	%
Total Payments Volume 4		717,249			654,974			1,322,837			1,130,896			956,439			818,558			739,969
Percentage change		9.5	%		17.6	%		17.0	%		18.2	%		16.8	%		10.6	%		6.5	%
Cash Volume		190,043			170,857			348,435			313,714			280,040			242,280			226,362
Percentage change		11.2	%		10.9	%		11.1	%		12.0	%		15.6	%		7.0	%		14.4	%
Total Volume	$	907,292		$	825,831		$	1,671,272		$	1,444,610		$	1,236,479		$	1,060,838		$	966,331
Percentage change		9.9	%		16.1	%		15.7	%		16.8	%		16.6	%		9.8	%		8.3	%
Total Transactions		12,767			11,565			23,410			20,009			16,653			14,099			12,542
Percentage change		10.4	%		17.7	%		17.0	%		20.2	%		18.1	%		12.4	%		12.3	%
Total Messages Processed		74,098			68,402			140,355			129,925			115,781			124,856			113,850
Percentage change		8.3	%		7.6	%		8.0	%		12.2	%		(7.3	%)*		9.7	%		11.0	%

210

 * The decline reflects a change in unit-of-measure used as a basis for clearing and settlement fees charged for certain variable access transactions. Excluding the effect of this change in unit-of-measure, transaction volumes increased 14%. In 2004, the unit-of-measure was changed to kilobytes of file transmission from number of transactions processed.

1 At September 30, 2003, Visa U.S.A. was in default of certain financial performance covenants as a result of the settlement of the Retailers’ litigation described in Note 18 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. As a consequence, the long-term portion of Visa U.S.A.’s debt was classified as being due within one year.

2 In 2003, Visa U.S.A. settled the Retailers’ litigation for approximately $2.0 billion, to be paid over ten years, as described in Note 18 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. The present value of this obligation was recorded in 2003.

3 Percentage change for the year ended September 30, 2002 represents change compared to the year ended September 30, 2001. Percentage change for the six months ended March 31, 2006 represents change compared to the six months ended March 31, 2005.

4 Total Payments Volume is provided by Visa U.S.A. members, subject to verification by Visa U.S.A. From time to time, members may update previously submitted sales volume information. Prior year sales volume information presented in this table has not been updated, as changes made are not material.

For further information, see Note 18 of the consolidated fiscal 2006 financial statements of Visa U.S.A. included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

211

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF

OPERATIONS OF VISA U.S.A.

This management’s discussion and analysis provides a review of the results of operations, financial condition, and the liquidity and capital resources of Visa U.S.A. and its subsidiaries and outlines the factors that have affected recent earnings, as well as those factors that may affect future earnings. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Visa U.S.A.’s consolidated financial statements and related notes as of and for the periods ended March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This management’s discussion and analysis contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be viewed as alternatives to, or more meaningful than, the comparable U.S. GAAP measure and should be considered in addition to, but not as substitutes for, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure. Readers are encouraged to review the reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures used to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures provided in the table below. See also additional discussion below under “—Operating Revenues—Volume and Support Agreements,” “—Operating Expenses—Administrative and Other” and “—Operating Expenses—Litigation Provision.”

Overview

Visa U.S.A. is a leader in the electronic payments industry in the United States and is responsible for administering Visa payment programs in the United States. Visa U.S.A. provides products and services over a secure payment network in support of payment programs offered by its member financial institutions to their consumer, commercial, and merchant customers. Visa U.S.A.’s principal product platforms include consumer credit, consumer debit and cash access, prepaid, and commercial programs. Visa U.S.A. is a group member of Visa International and, as of March 31, 2007, operates as a non-stock corporation with approximately 13,400 member financial institutions.

Visa U.S.A.’s business is highly correlated with overall economic conditions and consumer spending patterns in the United States. During the first two quarters of fiscal 2007, the pace of economic growth weakened, reflecting the impacts of a softening housing market, declining mortgage credit quality, and continued spikes in energy prices. This deceleration in growth was moderated by increases in business and government spending and growth in exports, which contributed to maintaining steady unemployment levels and modest increases in personal consumption expenditures. Consumers continued to rely more on personal income growth and credit card loans rather than home equity to support personal consumption expenditures.

The payments industry continues to evolve rapidly. Visa U.S.A. believes that the ongoing worldwide payments migration from paper-based to electronic forms creates significant opportunities for the continued growth of Visa U.S.A.’s business. Visa U.S.A. continues to explore opportunities to enhance its payment network to create innovative network-based services that will expand the scope of payment solutions to more and different customers. Visa U.S.A. contributes to innovation in the payment industry through several initiatives including developments in the areas of mobile and electronic commerce. Further, Visa U.S.A. is working to develop standards and programs that will allow consumers to conduct their financial transactions securely using a variety of contactless devices.

Visa U.S.A. endeavors to achieve its financial objectives by building incremental Visa-branded volume, by penetrating existing and emerging market segments via new payment platforms and services, and by effective expense management.

212

Visa U.S.A. continues to face challenges that can materially impact its business, including competition and pricing pressure within the global payments industry, due in part to consolidation in the financial sector and the growing influence of merchants. Visa U.S.A. also continues to face regulatory scrutiny of interchange fees and other aspects of the payments industry. Results of Visa U.S.A.’s ongoing litigation matters may also have an adverse impact on its business.

Visa U.S.A. achieved 13% growth in operating revenues in the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior year period. The growth in operating revenues was primarily due to a 10% increase in payments volume (as defined below) on Visa U.S.A.’s products for the six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2006, with double-digit sales growth in commercial and online consumer debit products. Payments volume is defined as the total monetary value of transactions for goods and services that are purchased with Visa products, including PIN-based debit, and excluding cash transactions.

Operating income increased 66% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same prior year period. These results were impacted by adjustments to Visa U.S.A.’s estimates of performance under volume and support agreements, as part of its routine quarterly review of these agreements, and by litigation provision charges related to ongoing litigation matters. Visa U.S.A. also recorded two substantial charges in prior year comparable periods including a provision for ongoing litigation matters, and a charge related to reimbursing members for costs associated with Visa U.S.A.’s holographic magnetic card in the six months ended March 31, 2006. Excluding the impacts of volume and support agreement adjustments, litigation provisions, and charges related to the holographic magnetic card, operating revenues grew 12% and operating income increased 34% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively, compared to the prior year comparable period.

The exclusion of these impacts results in percentages that are considered non-GAAP financial measures. Visa U.S.A. included these non-GAAP financial measures because management believes that they are useful to the reader in allowing for a better comparison between periods with respect to costs incurred that impacted the growth in operating revenues and operating income and thereby providing better insight into Visa U.S.A.’s operating performance. The following table provides a reconciliation of the growth in operating revenues and operating income when considering these impacts. See also additional discussion below under volume and support agreements, administrative and other, and litigation provision.

	Six Months Ended March 31, 2007			Six Months Ended March 31, 2006
	(in millions, except percentages)
Operating Revenues	$	1,658		$	1,467
Less: Volume and Support Agreement adjustments		58			37
Adjusted Operating Revenues (Non-GAAP)	$	1,600		$	1,430
Change in Adjusted Operating Revenues (Non-GAAP)		12	%
Operating Income	$	580		$	349
Add: Holographic Magnetic Card adjustments		(7	)		42
Add: Litigation Provision		15			49
Adjusted Operating Income (Non-GAAP)	$	588		$	440
Change in Adjusted Operating Income (Non-GAAP)		34	%

Visa U.S.A. achieved 11% growth in operating revenues in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005. The growth in operating revenues was primarily due to a 17% increase in payments volume on Visa U.S.A.’s products in fiscal 2006 compared to the same prior year period. All product categories experienced double-digit payments volume growth in fiscal 2006. More effective operating expense management enabled the growth in operating income to outpace growth in operating revenues. Operating income increased 61% in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005. Operating income as a percentage of operating revenues increased to 25% from 17% in fiscal 2005.

Visa U.S.A.’s total equity was $968 million at March 31, 2007 as compared to $583 million at September 30, 2006.

213

In November 2006, Visa U.S.A. announced plans to outsource certain data processing and development support functions over the course of fiscal 2007. This action was intended to help Visa U.S.A. better align personnel and contract staffing levels with seasonality and project demand. As a result of this strategy, Visa U.S.A. expects to reduce the total number of employees of Visa U.S.A. by approximately 6% of Visa U.S.A.’s total workforce as of March 31, 2007. Visa U.S.A. will incur severance and related personnel costs of approximately $15 million throughout fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008. This amount is an estimate based upon current assumptions for the timing of employee terminations and will be updated, as appropriate, to reflect actual termination dates. Although Visa U.S.A. believes that these estimates accurately reflect the costs of its plan, actual results may differ, thereby requiring Visa U.S.A. to record additional provisions or reverse a portion of such provisions. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, Visa U.S.A. incurred charges of $10 million in connection with these terminations. At March 31, 2007, the related liability in accrued compensation was $8 million.

In a cooperative industry effort in 2006, Visa U.S.A. co-founded the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI DSS) Council, an independent council that established security standards to protect cardholder data and to prevent fraud. In December 2006, Visa U.S.A. announced the introduction of the PCI Compliance Acceleration Program (PCI CAP) for merchants and VisaNet processors. The program uses both financial incentives and fines to encourage merchants to comply with the PCI industry standards. Visa U.S.A. expects the program to provide approximately $20 million in financial incentives through September 2007 to member acquirers upon validation of their merchants’ early compliance with PCI standards. Penalties will be levied for non-compliance after September 30, 2007. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, Visa U.S.A. recorded obligations of $7 million related to this program as a reduction of revenue under volume and support agreements on Visa U.S.A.’s consolidated statements of operations.

Results of Operations

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues are comprised of card service fees, data processing fees, international transaction fees, and other revenues, reduced by costs incurred under volume and support agreements. Visa U.S.A.’s operating revenues are based upon aggregate payments volume and transactional information reported by its members or accumulated by its transaction processing systems. Visa U.S.A.’s operating revenues are primarily generated from fees calculated on the payments volume of activity on cards carrying the Visa brand, which we refer to as card service fees, and from the fees charged to members for providing transaction processing, which we refer to as data processing fees, and other payment services described below. Card service fees and data processing fees combined represent 77% of Visa U.S.A.’s gross operating revenues for both six month periods ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, and 77%, 76%, and 77% of Visa U.S.A.’s gross operating revenues in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005, and fiscal 2004, respectively. Gross operating revenues is defined as total operating revenues excluding volume and support agreements.

Card Service Fees

Card service fees reflect payments by members for their participation in card programs carrying marks of the Visa brand. Current quarter card service fees are assessed using a calculation of pricing applied to prior quarter volumes as reported on member quarterly operating certificates, exclusive of online PIN-based debit. These payments volumes also do not include cash disbursements obtained with Visa-branded cards, balance transfers, or convenience checks.

Data Processing Fees

Visa U.S.A. operates a proprietary network, VisaNet, which provides transaction processing services linking issuers and acquirers. Processing services are provided through Visa U.S.A.’s majority-owned subsidiary, Inovant, which operates VisaNet, the transaction processing platform that provides message processing services

214

linking issuers and acquirers. Visa U.S.A. also provides processing services to Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe, in accordance with service agreements with these entities. Data processing fees are based on information Visa U.S.A. accumulates from VisaNet. Data processing fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transaction occurs or services are rendered.

Data processing fees are primarily driven by the number and type of transaction messages processed and represent fees for processing messages that facilitate the following services:

• Authorization—fees to route authorization requests to the issuer when a merchant, through its acquirer, requests approval of a cardholder’s transaction;

• Clearing and settlement—fees for determining and transferring transaction amounts due between acquirers and issuers;

• Single Message System, or SMS, switching—fees for use of the SMS for determining and transferring debit transaction amounts due between acquirers and issuers;

• Member processing—fees for use of the Debit Processing Service, which provides processing and support for Visa debit products and services;

• Processing guarantee—fees charged for network operations and maintenance necessary for ongoing system availability; and

• Other products and services—fees for miscellaneous services that facilitate transaction and information management among Visa U.S.A.’s members.

Volume and Support Agreements

Volume and support agreements are contracts with members, merchants and other business partners for various programs designed to build payments volume and increase product acceptance. These volume and support agreements, which range in term from one to thirteen years, provide incentives based on payments volume growth, card issuance, and marketing and program support based on specific performance requirements. These agreements are designed to encourage member loyalty and to increase overall Visa-branded payments volume, thereby reducing unit transaction processing costs and increasing brand awareness for all Visa members.

Payments made to members and merchants under volume and support agreements are generally recorded as reductions of card service and data processing fee revenues. Volume and support agreements related to sponsorships are recorded as advertising, marketing, and promotion expense, discussed below. Member and merchant agreements are primarily used to build payments volume while sponsorship agreements are primarily used to build brand awareness. For member and merchant contracts, contract values are estimated based on projected sales performances and may change when actual sales performances differ from projections, resulting in adjustments to volume and support agreements. Management routinely reviews volume and support agreements and estimates of performance. Estimated costs associated with these contracts are adjusted as appropriate to reflect sales performance and projections that are higher or lower than management’s original expectation or to reflect contract amendments.

International Transaction Fees

International transaction fees are assessed to members on non-U.S. transactions of U.S.-based issuing financial institutions and U.S. transactions of non-U.S.-based issuing financial institutions. These are referred to as cross-border transactions. International transaction fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered. International transaction fees are generally driven by cross-border payments volume.

Other Revenues

Other revenues represent optional card enhancements, such as extended cardholder protection and concierge services, cardholder and merchant services, software development services, and other services provided to Visa

215

U.S.A.’s members, Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe. Software development services are provided through Inovant on a time and materials basis primarily to Visa International, Visa Europe, and Visa Canada.

Six Months Ended March 31, 2007 compared to Six Months Ended March 31, 2006

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues were as follows for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior year period. The increase in operating revenues was primarily driven by increases in card service fees and data processing fees due to growth in payments volume and transactions messages processed.

							2007 vs. 2006
Six Months Ended March 31,	2007			2006			$ Change		% Change
	(in millions, except percentages)
Card Service Fees	$	811		$	738		$	73	10	%
Data Processing Fees		652			613			39	6	%
Volume and Support Agreements		(234	)		(279	)		45	(16	)%
International Transaction Fees		211			186			25	13	%
Other Revenues		218			209			9	4	%
Total Operating Revenues	$	1,658		$	1,467		$	191	13	%

Card Service Fees

Payments volume, which includes payments on Visa-branded cards for goods and services in the preceding quarter, exclusive of online PIN-based debit, is used as the basis for card service fees. The increase in card service fees is primarily driven by payments volume exclusive of PIN-based debit, which increased $50 billion, or 9%, to $642 billion for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior year period. Card service fees outpaced the growth in underlying payments volume due to the absence of certain rebate and incentive programs, which ended after December 31, 2005.

Data Processing Fees

The increase in data processing fees is primarily due to the number of transaction messages processed, which increased 8% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same prior year period. The growth in transaction messages processed outpaced the growth in data processing fees due to higher volume-based discounts resulting from consolidation and transaction growth among members. Also, as conversion to Interlink, Visa U.S.A.’s PIN-based debit platform, has leveled off, growth in volume-based discounts outpaced the impact of growth from PIN-based debit transactions and related data processing fees, which are priced at higher rates than other transaction services. Of total data processing fees, $61 million and $60 million were earned collectively from Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively.

Volume and Support Agreements

The decrease in volume and support agreements for the six months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily due to the impact of adjustments to existing agreements as management revised estimates of performance under these agreements during its routine quarterly review and due to amendments to volume and support agreements during the period. Contract adjustments reduced volume and support agreements costs by a total of $58 million and $37 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively. As payments volume growth has softened from the prior year, estimates of performance under volume and support agreements have been adjusted accordingly. Also, volume and support costs were reduced during the six months ended March 31, 2007 due to a member’s lack of performance on a bonus target.

216

International Transaction Fees

The increase in international transaction fees was primarily driven by multi-currency payments volume, which increased 12% or $4 billion for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same prior year period. The increase in international transaction fees was broadly in line with the growth in multi-currency payments volume, reflecting more cross-border transactions as overall global travel has increased.

Other Revenues

The increase in other revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2007 primarily reflected:

• revenue growth of $12 million related to a merchant incentive program. Revenues related to the program were deferred and were recognized only when used for designated purposes. The program collects fees from members and the funds are designed to support various merchant programs designed to build payments volume and increase product acceptance.

This revenue growth was offset by:

• reduction of revenues of $5 million for rebate payments to members in connection with certain rewards fulfillment services related to the Visa Extras program. For further information, see Note 10 to the March 31, 2007 unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.

Operating Expenses

Total Operating expenses decreased during the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior year period. The decrease in operating expenses primarily reflects the impact of certain litigation provisions and charges for the holographic magnetic card reimbursements that were incurred in the six months ended March 31, 2006, offset by increases in professional and consulting fees during the six months ended March 31, 2007.

					2007 vs. 2006
Six Months Ended March 31,	2007		2006		$ Change			% Change
	(in millions, except percentages)
Personnel	$	345	$	329	$	16		5	%
Facilities		45		44		1		2	%
Network, EDP, and Communications		161		161		—		—	%
Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion		250		260		(10	)	(4	)%
Visa International Fees		86		86		—		—	%
Professional and Consulting Fees		150		118		32		27	%
Administrative and Other		26		72		(46	)	(64	)%
Litigation Provision		15		49		(34	)	(69	)%
Total Operating Expenses	$	1,078	$	1,119	$	(41	)	(4	)%

Visa U.S.A. total operating expenses as a percentage of total operating revenues decreased to 65% from 76% in the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same prior year period. The decrease reflects the impacts of volume and support agreement adjustments, litigation provisions, and charges related to the holographic magnetic card reimbursements discussed above. Excluding the impact of adjustments to volume and support agreements, litigation provisions, and charges for the holographic magnetic card reimbursements, Visa U.S.A.’s total operating expenses as a percentage of total operating revenues was 67% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to 72% in the same prior year period, reflecting effective expense management.

217

The exclusion of these impacts results in percentages that are considered non-GAAP financial measures. Visa U.S.A. includes these non-GAAP financial measures because management believes that they are useful to the reader in allowing for a better comparison between periods with respect to costs incurred that impacted the growth in operating revenues and operating income and thereby providing better insight into Visa U.S.A.’s operating performance. The following table provides a reconciliation of operating expenses as a percentage of operating revenues when considering these impacts. See also additional discussions above under “—Operating Revenues—Volume and Support Agreements,” “—Operating Expenses—Administrative and Other” and “—Operating Expenses—Litigation Provision.”

	Six Months Ended March 31, 2007			Six Months Ended March 31, 2006
	(in millions, except percentages)
Operating Revenues	$	1,658		$	1,467
Less: Volume and Support Agreement adjustments		58			37
Operating Revenues (Non-GAAP)	$	1,600		$	1,430
Operating Expenses	$	1,078		$	1,119
Less: Holographic Magnetic Card adjustments		(7	)		42
Less: Litigation Provision		15			49
Operating Expenses (Non-GAAP)	$	1,070		$	1,028
Operating Expense (Non-GAAP) as a percentage of Operating Revenues (Non-GAAP)		67	%		72	%

Personnel

Personnel expense consists of salaries, incentives, and various fringe benefits. The increase in personnel expense for the six months ended March 31, 2007 primarily reflected the impact of $10 million in severance and related personnel expenses connected with plans to outsource certain data processing and development support functions. For further information, see Note 8 to the March 31, 2007 unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.

Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion

Advertising, marketing, and promotion expense includes expenses associated with advertising and marketing programs, sponsorships, promotions and other related incentives to promote the Visa brand and assist members in achieving their goals. In connection with certain sponsorship agreements, Visa U.S.A. has an obligation to spend certain minimum amounts for advertising and marketing promotion over the terms of the agreements. Visa U.S.A. anticipates similar spending requirements going forward. The decrease in advertising, marketing, and promotion expense for the six months ended March 31, 2007 primarily reflected the absence of initial launch expenditures for Visa U.S.A.’s new brand mark and card design which began in January 2006 and the “Life Takes Visa” advertising campaign, which began in February 2006.

Professional and Consulting Fees

Professional and consulting fees consist of fees for consulting, contractors, legal, and other professional services. Professional and consulting fees increased for the six months ended March 31, 2007 primarily due to the following:

• Additional legal fees incurred to support ongoing litigation matters of $20 million (see Note 11 to the March 31, 2007 unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.);

• Additional professional fees paid for advisory services related to merger activities and formation of Visa Inc. of $4 million; and,

• Additional contractors and outsourcing expense in connection with the outsourcing of certain data processing and development functions as described in the overview above, and additional contractors in connection with the support of other development and maintenance projects, totaling $8 million.

218

Administrative and Other

Administrative and other expenses primarily consist of other corporate and overhead expenses in support of business, travel, and directors’ fees. Administrative and other expense decreased in the six months ended March 31, 2007, primarily reflecting the absence of a $42 million charge, recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2006, to reimburse members for production and issuance costs related to discontinued use of Visa-branded cards with the holographic magnetic stripe design (see Note 10 to the March 31, 2007 unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.). During the six months ended March 31, 2007, Visa U.S.A. reduced the charges related to this issue by $7 million as certain members’ claims for reimbursement were revised.

Litigation Provision

Visa U.S.A. is a party to various legal and regulatory proceedings. The litigation provision is an estimate of litigation expense and is based on Visa U.S.A.’s understanding of its litigation profile, the specifics of each case, advice of counsel to the extent appropriate and management’s best estimate of incurred loss as of the balance sheet dates. Visa U.S.A. will continue to review the litigation accrual and, if necessary, future refinements of the accrual will be made. The decrease in the litigation provision primarily reflects the absence of litigation provisions for litigation matters which were charged and subsequently settled in the prior year.

Total liabilities for legal matters changed as follows:

	In Millions
Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	1,000
Provision for legal matters		15
Interest accretion on settled matters		35
Payments on settled matters		(1	)
Balance as of March 31, 2007	$	1,049

Other Income (Expense)

The increase in other income (expense) was primarily driven by higher equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates and higher investment income.

							2007 vs. 2006
Six Months Ended March 31,	2007			2006			$ Change		% Change
	(in millions, except percentages)
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates	$	25		$	13		$	12	92	%
Interest Expense		(40	)		(45	)		5	(11	)%
Investment Income, Net		46			27			19	70	%
Total	$	31		$	(5	)	$	36	720	%

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates includes investments in Visa International and joint ventures that own, lease, develop and operate all facilities and properties used jointly by Visa U.S.A. and Visa International. The increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates for the six months ended March 31, 2007 primarily reflected higher Visa International net income, offset by a decrease in Visa U.S.A.’s proportionate equity interest in Visa International earnings from the prior year, reflecting the fact that Visa U.S.A.’s fees paid to Visa International comprised a lower percentage of total payments volume-based fees paid to Visa International.

219

Interest Expense

Interest expense primarily includes interest incurred on Visa U.S.A.’s series A and series B senior secured notes, due December 2007 and December 2012, respectively, and accretion associated with litigation settlements to be paid over periods longer than one year. The decrease in interest expense for the six months ended March 31, 2007 primarily reflected lower accretion expense for the Retailers’ Litigation matter over time as annual settlement payments are made.

Investment Income, Net

The increase in investment income, net for the six months ended March 31, 2007 primarily reflected higher earnings on fixed-income investment securities and commercial paper, due to higher average investment balances and higher market interest rates compared to the prior year.

Income Taxes

Visa U.S.A.’s effective tax rate is a combination of federal and state statutory rates and allowable adjustments to taxable income. The effective tax rate remained broadly consistent at 37% for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to 36% during the same prior year period.

Minority Interest

Minority interest represents the 31% interest in Inovant owned by Visa Canada, Visa International, and Visa Europe. The decrease in minority interest for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior year period reflected lower Inovant net income as a result of charges for severance and termination benefits related to Visa U.S.A.’s plans to outsource certain data processing and development support functions. For further information, see Note 8 to the March 31, 2007 unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.

Year Ended September 30, 2006 compared to Year Ended September 30, 2005

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues were $3.0 billion and $2.7 billion in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, reflecting an increase of $0.3 billion, or 11%. The increase in operating revenues was primarily driven by increases in card service fees and data processing fees due to growth in payments volume and transactions, which increased 17% and 8%, respectively. In fiscal 2006, growth in consumer credit volume continued to favorably impact operating revenues, driven largely by Visa Signature, Visa U.S.A.’s premium credit platform, which generates higher fees. Operating revenues were also impacted by growth in debit volumes and messages processed, reflecting the ongoing impact of certain member conversions to the debit Interlink platform.

							2006 vs. 2005
For the Years Ended September 30,	2006			2005			$ Change			% Change
	(in millions, except percentages)
Card Service Fees	$	1,482		$	1,289		$	193		15	%
Data Processing Fees		1,248			1,139			109		10	%
Volume and Support Agreements		(588	)		(524	)		(64	)	12	%
International Transaction Fees		398			360			38		11	%
Other Revenues		408			401			7		2	%
Total Operating Revenues	$	2,948		$	2,665		$	283		11	%

Card Service Fees

The increase in card service fees in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 of 15% was in line with the growth in underlying payments volume exclusive of PIN-based debit, which increased $151.0 billion to $1.2 trillion in fiscal 2006, reflecting increased spending on all product platforms volumes.

220

Data Processing Fees

Data processing fees increased 10% while the number of transaction messages processed increased 8% in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. The increase in data processing fees in fiscal 2006 outpaced the increase in transaction messages processed despite higher volume-based discounts resulting from consolidations of members and transaction growth amongst members, primarily due to the growth in debit. Growth in debit messages processed and related data processing fees, which are priced at higher rates than credit messages processed, outpaced the impact of growth in volume-based discounts across all product lines. Growth in the mix of debit transaction messages in fiscal 2006 primarily reflects conversion of various member financial institutions to Interlink, Visa U.S.A.’s PIN-based debit platform. Of the total data processing fees, $122 million and $121 million was earned from Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively.

Volume and Support Agreements

Growth of volume and support agreements in fiscal 2006 was primarily due to the execution of new agreements in support of Visa U.S.A. partnership programs with existing members, and co-branding programs with existing members and new merchants.

International Transaction Fees

International transaction fees increased 11% while multi-currency payments volume increased 9% or $4.4 billion in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005. The increase in international transaction fees was higher than the growth in multi-currency payments volume due to the differential between foreign and domestic interchange rates.

Other Revenues

The increase in other revenues in fiscal 2006 primarily reflected:

• Revenue growth from loyalty programs such as Visa Extras and the Visa Incentive Network of $35 million. Visa Extras is a platform for enrolled Visa cardholders to earn reward points toward qualifying purchases. Visa Incentive Network allows merchants and members to manage cardholder awards and enhancements at the cardholder level in order to deliver tailored offers to cardholders;

• Revenue growth of $18 million for technology projects and services performed for Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe; and

• Other miscellaneous increases in revenues relating to optional card enhancements, fines and penalties relating to merchant chargeback’s, and other services.

These increases were offset by:

• Reduction in revenues of $36 million related to a merchant incentive program. The program collects fees from members and the funds are intended to support various merchant programs designed to build payments volume and increase product acceptance. Beginning in fiscal 2006, the program was modified, requiring specific use of related revenues. Revenues related to the merchant incentive program were therefore deferred and recognized only when expended as designated in specific acceptance programs.

• Absence of $20 million in revenues recognized in fiscal 2005 related to deferred revenues from previous periods.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses were unchanged at $2.2 billion for both fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. Visa U.S.A. reduced its total operating expenses as a percentage of total operating revenues to 75% in fiscal 2006 compared to 83% in fiscal 2005 due to more effective expense management and the absence of certain charges

221

associated with Visa U.S.A.’s litigation provision expense recorded in fiscal 2005. The charge to litigation provision expense in fiscal 2005 was primarily related to the multicurrency matter that was subsequently settled in fiscal 2006. For further information, see Note 18 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.

					2006 vs. 2005
For the Years Ended September 30,	2006		2005		$ Change			% Change
	(in millions, except percentages)
Personnel	$	671	$	619	$	52		8	%
Facilities		89		93		(4	)	(4	)%
Network, EDP, and Communications		328		338		(10	)	(3	)%
Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion		539		528		11		2	%
Visa International Fees		159		169		(10	)	(6	)%
Professional and Consulting Fees		291		273		18		7	%
Administrative and Other		118		60		58		97	%
Litigation Provision		23		132		(109	)	(83	)%
Total Operating Expenses	$	2,218	$	2,212	$	6		—	%

Personnel

Personnel expense consists of salaries, incentives, and various fringe benefits. The increase in personnel expense in fiscal 2006 reflected annual salary adjustments, which were broadly in line with inflation, and an increase in the number of employees in support of various corporate initiatives at Visa U.S.A.

Network, EDP, and Communications

Network, EDP, and communications expenses represent expenses for the operation of the Visa U.S.A. electronic payment network, including maintenance, depreciation, and fees for other data processing services. The decrease in network, EDP, and communications expense in fiscal 2006 primarily reflected a decrease in software expense of $9 million due to Visa U.S.A. lowering its threshold for capitalizing software from a unit cost greater than $25,000 or an aggregate purchase cost greater than $250,000 to a unit cost or aggregate purchase cost greater than $10,000.

Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion

Advertising, marketing, and promotion expense includes expenses associated with advertising and marketing programs, sponsorships, promotions and other related incentives to promote the Visa brand and assist members in achieving their goals. In connection with certain sponsorship agreements, Visa U.S.A. has an obligation to spend certain minimum amounts for advertising and marketing promotion over the terms of the agreements. Visa U.S.A. anticipates similar spending requirements going forward. The increase in advertising, marketing, and promotion expense in fiscal 2006 primarily reflected higher expenditures for Visa U.S.A.’s new brand mark and card design launch which began in January 2006 and its “Life Takes Visa” advertising campaign, launched in February 2006.

Visa International Fees

Visa U.S.A. pays fees to Visa International based on payments volumes exclusive of PIN-based debit, for services primarily related to global brand management, global product enhancements, management of global system development and interoperability, and corporate support to the entire Visa enterprise. The fees are calculated based on Visa U.S.A.’s relative percentage of these payments volumes compared to other Visa

222

regions. The decrease in Visa International fees in fiscal 2006 primarily reflected reductions in Visa U.S.A.’s percentage of worldwide sales volumes, as global emerging markets experienced higher sales volume growth rates than the more mature U.S. economy.

Professional and Consulting Fees

Professional and consulting fees consist of fees for consulting, contractors, legal, and other professional services. Professional and consulting fees increased in fiscal 2006 primarily due to professional contracting fees incurred to provide analysis and support for various programs and projects including product development and innovation, call center operations, and global processing and system development. Additional expenses for accounting and auditing services were incurred in conjunction with Visa U.S.A.’s review of internal controls over financial reporting, and additional legal fees were incurred to support ongoing litigation matters.

Administrative and Other

Administrative and other expenses primarily consist of other corporate and overhead expenses in support of business, travel, and directors’ fees. Administrative and other expense increased in fiscal 2006, primarily reflecting the following non-recurring expenses:

• A $24 million charge to reimburse members for production and issuance costs related to discontinued use of Visa-branded cards with the holographic magnetic stripe design;

• A $13 million impairment charge for the net carrying value of Visa U.S.A.’s Mini Card license. Given Visa U.S.A.’s strategic focus on developing next-generation payment platforms and services, and minimal Mini Card issuance by members, Visa U.S.A. assessed a low probability of future incremental cash flows from the Mini Card; and

• An $11 million charge to reflect expenses for business objectives related to a litigation settlement in fiscal 2006. The settlement required Visa U.S.A. to either meet certain joint business objectives or make cash payments in lieu of the business objectives over five years. Because Visa U.S.A. expects to make these related cash payments without receiving future benefits, Visa U.S.A. charged the present value of the total payments to its consolidated statements of operations in fiscal 2006.

Litigation Provision

Visa U.S.A. is a party to various legal and regulatory proceedings. The litigation provision is an estimate and is based on Visa U.S.A.’s understanding of its litigation profile, the specifics of each case, advice of counsel to the extent appropriate and management’s best estimate of incurred loss as of the balance sheet dates. Visa U.S.A. will continue to review the litigation accrual and, if necessary, future refinements of the accrual will be made. (For further information about Visa U.S.A.’s legal and regulatory proceedings referenced above, see “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings” and Note 18 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.). The decrease in the provision in fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year was driven by the following:

• Absence of litigation provision for the multicurrency matter of $94 million, which was charged in fiscal 2005 and settled in fiscal 2006;

• Downward adjustment of $16 million to the litigation provision reflecting the settlement of two matters in July 2006; and

• A $12 million insurance recovery related to one of the matters settled in July 2006.

223

Total liabilities for legal matters changed as follows:

	In Millions
Balance as of September 30, 2005	$	1,208
Provision for legal matters		34
Insurance recovery		(11	)
Interest accretion on settled matters		92
Payments on settled matters		(323	)
Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	1,000

Other Income (Expense)

Other expense was $8 million in fiscal 2006 compared to other income of $3 million in fiscal 2005. The decrease in other income primarily reflected the absence of a non-recurring gain-on-sale of a joint venture interest in Vital Services Processing L.L.C., a financial transaction processor for acquirers and merchants, which occurred in fiscal 2005 and lower equity in earnings related to Visa U.S.A.’s ownership in Visa International. Vital Services Processing L.L.C. was formed by Merchant Processing Holdings, Inc. and Total System Services, Inc. in 1996.

							2006 vs. 2005
For the Years Ended September 30,	2006			2005			$ Change			% Change
	(in millions, except percentages)
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates	$	13		$	31		$	(18	)	(58	)%
Interest Expense		(89	)		(109	)		20		(18	)%
Investment Income, Net		68			81			(13	)	(16	)%
Other Income (Expense)	$	(8	)	$	3		$	(11	)	(367	)%

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates includes investments in Visa International and joint ventures that own, lease, develop and operate all facilities and properties used jointly by Visa U.S.A. and Visa International. The decrease in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in fiscal 2006 primarily reflected lower Visa International net income and a decrease in Visa U.S.A.’s proportionate equity interest in Visa International earnings from the prior year, reflecting the fact that Visa U.S.A. comprised a lower percentage of total payments volume-based fees paid to Visa International. The decrease also reflected the absence of equity in earnings from Vital Processing Services L.L.C., a joint venture between Merchant Processing Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Visa U.S.A., and Total System Services, Inc. following the sale of Visa U.S.A.’s 50% equity interest in the joint venture during fiscal 2005.

Interest Expense

Interest expense primarily includes interest incurred on Visa U.S.A.’s series A and series B senior secured notes, due December 2007 and December 2012, respectively, and accretion associated with litigation settlements to be paid over periods longer than one year. The decrease in interest expense in fiscal 2006 primarily reflected the absence of accretion expense on litigation for certain merchants who opted not to participate in the plaintiff’s class in the Retailers’ Litigation matter. These litigation matters were settled in the first six months of fiscal 2005. For further information regarding the retailer’s litigation matter, see Note 18 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.

224

Investment Income, Net

The decrease in investment income, net in fiscal 2006 primarily reflected the absence of a $42 million gain on the sale of Visa U.S.A.’s 50% equity interest in Vital Processing Services L.L.C. in fiscal 2005. The decrease was offset by higher earnings on fixed-income investment securities, due to higher average investment balances and higher market interest rates for current year periods compared to the prior year.

Income Taxes

Visa U.S.A.’s effective tax rate decreased to 35% in fiscal 2006 from 40% for the prior year comparable period. The lower effective tax rate is primarily attributable to additional tax benefits granted by the state related to Visa U.S.A.’s tax filing methodology in fiscal 2006 and the absence of one-time releases of deferred tax assets related to the adoption of a new state tax filing methodology, which occurred in 2005.

The components impacting the effective tax rate are:

	For the Years Ended September 30,
	2006					2005
	(in millions, except percentages)
	Dollars			Percent		Dollars			Percent
Income Before Income Taxes, Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, and Minority Interest	$	722				$	606
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, Gross		—					(150	)
Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest		722					456
Minority Interest Expense		16					8
U.S. Federal Statutory Tax		253		35	%		160		35	%
State Tax Effect, Net of Federal Benefit		(11	)	(2	)%		21		5	%
Non-deductible Expenses and Other Differences		20		3	%		7		2	%
Tax-Exempt Income		(3	)	—			(2	)	(1	)%
Adjustment to Deferred Taxes—Federal		(3	)	—			—		—
Refund Claims and Settlement of Audit Matters—Federal		1		—			—		—
Minority Interest—Not Subject to Tax		(6	)	(1	)%		(3	)	(1	)%
Income Tax Expense	$	251		35	%	$	183		40	%

Minority Interest

Minority interest represents the 31% ownership interest in Inovant owned by Visa Canada, Visa International, and Visa Europe. In September 2005, Inovant, Inc. sold a 10% interest in Inovant to Visa Europe and a 6% interest to Visa International and its CEMEA region at a price equivalent to the founder’s cost, thereby reducing Visa U.S.A.’s ownership of Inovant from 85% to 69%. This increase in third party ownership had a full year impact in fiscal 2006 resulting in increased minority interest expense in fiscal 2006.

225

Year Ended September 30, 2005 compared to Year Ended September 30, 2004

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues were $2.7 billion and $2.4 billion in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively. The growth in operating revenues was principally due to increased payments volume and transaction messages processed which increased 18% and 12%, respectively. Operating revenues were impacted by growth in debit payments volume and transaction messages, reflecting certain member conversions to Interlink, Visa’s PIN-based debit platform, and new partnership relationships that began during fiscal 2005.

							2005 vs. 2004
For the Years Ended September 30,	2005			2004			$ Change			% Change
	(in millions, except percentages)
Card Service Fees	$	1,289		$	1,191		$	98		8	%
Data Processing Fees		1,139			1,038			101		10	%
Volume and Support Agreements		(524	)		(466	)		(58	)	12	%
International Transaction Fees		360			306			54		18	%
Other Revenues		401			360			41		11	%
Total Operating Revenues	$	2,665		$	2,429		$	236		10	%

Card Service Fees

Card service fees were primarily driven by payments volume, exclusive of PIN-based debit, which increased $126.0 billion or 14% to $1.0 trillion in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004, reflecting increased consumer use of card products for spending. Revenue from card service fees lagged growth in underlying payments volume due to the combined impacts of:

• Additional partnership program benefits, which began in fiscal 2005, for partners meeting certain volume and loyalty thresholds;

• Mergers or consolidations of certain of Visa U.S.A.’s members since fiscal 2004, for which higher sales volumes of the merged businesses qualified for higher volume-based discounts; and

• New partnership relationships and associated partnership discounts that commenced in fiscal 2005.

Data Processing Fees

Data processing fees are primarily driven by the number of transaction messages processed, which increased 12% in fiscal 2005. Growth in data processing fees in fiscal 2005 was lower than the growth in the number of underlying transaction messages processed due primarily to the impact of:

• Higher volume discounts reflecting the consolidation and growth of transactions among members; and

• Discounts initiated during the year that are applied to transactions in which the same member is both the issuing and acquiring financial institution.

Of total data processing fees, $121 million and $119 million were earned from Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe, collectively, in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively.

Volume and Support Agreements

Volume and support agreements increased due to new agreements in support of Visa U.S.A.’s partnership programs with existing members, and co-branding programs with existing members and new merchants. Volume and support agreements remained consistent as a percentage of gross operating revenues in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004.

226

International Transaction Fees

International transaction fees are generally driven by multi-currency payments volume, which increased 14% or $6.0 billion in fiscal 2005. The 18% increase in international transaction fees over the growth in multi-currency payments volume was due to the differential between foreign and domestic interchange rates.

Other Revenues

The increase in other revenues in fiscal 2005 primarily reflected:

• Recognition of $20 million in revenues deferred in prior periods;

• Revenue growth of $14 million from loyalty programs such as Visa Extras and the Visa Incentive Network; and

• Revenue growth of $14 million related to a merchant incentive program fee, which increased broadly in line with payments volumes. These fees are used to support various merchant programs designed to build payments volume and increase product acceptance.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses were $2.2 billion and $2.0 billion in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively, reflecting an increase of $213 million, or 11%. The increase primarily reflected additional litigation provision charges and additional advertising, marketing, and promotion spending in support of the Visa Signature platform and small business and debit products. Visa U.S.A.’s total operating expenses as a percentage of total operating revenues was 83% in fiscal 2005 compared to 82% in fiscal 2004.

					2005 vs. 2004
For the Years Ended September 30,	2005		2004		$ Change			% Change
	(in millions, except percentages)
Personnel	$	619	$	628	$	(9	)	(1	)%
Facilities		93		90		3		3	%
Network, EDP, and Communications		338		300		38		13	%
Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion		528		471		57		12	%
Visa International Fees		169		196		(27	)	(14	)%
Professional and Consulting Fees		273		231		42		18	%
Administrative and Other		60		46		14		30	%
Litigation Provision		132		37		95		257	%
Total Operating Expenses	$	2,212	$	1,999	$	213		11	%

Network, EDP, and Communications

The increase in network, EDP, and communications expense for fiscal 2005 primarily reflected depreciation and amortization expense for equipment and internally developed software platforms that were capitalized during the year.

Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion

The increase in advertising, marketing, and promotion expense in fiscal 2005 primarily reflected increased advertising for Visa U.S.A.’s Signature platform, small business and debit products, and Visa U.S.A.’s suite of fraud-protection services as well as increased promotion expense.

Visa International Fees

The decrease in Visa International fees in fiscal 2005 primarily reflected reductions in Visa U.S.A.’s percentage of worldwide Visa payments volumes, as global emerging markets experienced higher payments volume growth rates than the more mature U.S. economy.

227

Professional and Consulting Fees

Professional and consulting fees increased in fiscal 2005, primarily as a result of higher management consulting fees and professional contracting fees to develop and provide maintenance on several system and business projects. Additional legal fees were also incurred to support ongoing litigation matters.

Administrative and Other

Administrative and other expenses increased in fiscal 2005. The prior fiscal year included a non-recurring reduction in bank charges, that had previously been accrued, related to lower-than-anticipated restructuring costs on amendments to Visa U.S.A.’s note purchase agreement for its senior secured notes issued in March 2004. Visa U.S.A. also increased its charitable contributions in fiscal 2005, reflecting Visa U.S.A.’s contributions to various hurricane and earthquake relief efforts.

Litigation Provision

The litigation provision increase in fiscal 2005 was primarily the result of the following:

• Settlement agreements of $25 million with certain merchants who opted out of the Retailers’ Litigation matter;

• Provision for certain ongoing litigation matters, including those matters related to multi-currency litigation claims, of $94 million; and

• Compensation of $17 million to Visa International, Visa Europe, and Visa Canada in resolution of certain related to the earnings and distributions from Inovant as well as in consideration of their mutual release from claims with respect to these matters.

Total liabilities for legal matters changed as follows:

	In Millions
Balance as of September 30, 2004	$	1,263
Provision for legal matters		132
Interest accretion on settled matters		99
Payments on settled matters		(286	)
Balance as of September 30, 2005	$	1,208

Other Income (Expense)

Other income was $3 million in fiscal 2005 and other expense was $75 million in fiscal 2004, reflecting a decrease in expense of $78 million. The decrease was primarily due to higher investment income reflecting a $42 million investment gain recorded in fiscal 2005 from the sale of Visa U.S.A.’s 50% interest in the Vital Processing Services L.L.C. joint venture.

							2005 vs. 2004
For the Years Ended September 30,	2005			2004			$ Change		% Change
	(in millions, except percentages)
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates	$	31		$	22		$	9	41	%
Interest Expense		(109	)		(111	)		2	(2	)%
Investment Income, Net		81			14			67	479	%
Other Income (Expense)	$	3		$	(75	)	$	78	(104	)%

228

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates

The increase in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates reflected equity in earnings of Visa International recorded as a cumulative effect of accounting change on implementation of Emerging Issues Task Force No 02-14, “Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other Than Common Stock” during fiscal 2005. For further information, see Note 3 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in equity in earnings of Vital Processing Services L.L.C. following the sale of Visa U.S.A.’s 50% equity interest in Vital Processing Services L.L.C. in March 2005.

Investment Income, Net

The increase in investment income, net in fiscal 2005 primarily reflects the investment gain recorded from the sale of Visa U.S.A.’s 50% interest in Vital Processing Services L.L.C. and higher earnings on fixed-income investment securities, due to larger average investment balances and improving financial markets in fiscal 2005.

Income Taxes

Visa U.S.A.’s effective tax rate increased to 40% in fiscal 2005 compared to 37% from the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily attributable to the effect of the initial adoption of a state tax filing methodology. As a result of the new state tax filing methodology, existing deferred tax assets were revalued. This resulted in a reduction to deferred tax assets and higher income tax expense in fiscal 2005.

The components impacting the effective tax rate are:

	For the Years Ended September 30,
	2005					2004
	(in millions, except percentages)
	Dollars			Percent		Dollars			Percent
Income Before Income Taxes, Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change and Minority Interest		606					344
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, Gross		(150	)				11
Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest		456					355
Minority Interest Expense		8					7
Federal Statutory Tax		160		35	%		124		35	%
State Tax Effect, Net of Federal Benefit		21		5	%		16		5	%
Non-deductible Expenses and Other Differences		7		2	%		(5	)	(2	)%
Tax-Exempt Income		(2	)	(1	)%		—		—
Adjustment to Deferred Taxes- Federal:		—		—			—		—
Refund Claims and Settlement of Audit Matters—Federal		—		—			—		—
Minority Interest—Not Subject to Tax		(3	)	(1	)%		(2	)	(1	)%
Income Tax Expense	$	183		40	%	$	133		37	%

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Visa U.S.A. maintains comprehensive cash flow budgets and forecasts to project Visa U.S.A.’s short-term and long-term liquidity needs, and maintain controls and governance over spending and investment decisions. Visa U.S.A.’s corporate investment policy was approved by its board of directors and Visa U.S.A.’s Asset and Liability Committee oversees Visa U.S.A.’s treasury activity.

229

Visa U.S.A. requires capital resources and liquidity to:

• Enable uninterrupted settlement of debit transactions;

• Fund development of new technology, payment products, and services;

• Fund payment obligations under volume and support agreements;

• Finance capital expenditures and future investments;

• Service the payments of principal and interest on outstanding debt; and

• Pay the costs of litigation, including settlements.

The objectives of Visa U.S.A.’s investment policy are to service the payments of principal and interest on its outstanding debt, to provide adequate liquidity to cover operating expenditures and liquidity contingency scenarios, and to optimize income earned within acceptable risk criteria.

Settlement of certain debit transactions due from and due to members represents Visa U.S.A.’s most consistent liquidity requirement. These settlement receivables and payables generally remain outstanding for one to two business days. Visa U.S.A. maintains a liquidity position sufficient to enable uninterrupted daily net debit settlement. Visa International is Visa U.S.A.’s settlement agent for credit and all other debit transactions.

Sources of Liquidity

Visa U.S.A.’s primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash provided by operating activities, and a fixed-income investment portfolio. Funds from operations are maintained in cash and cash equivalents, short-term available-for-sale investments, or long-term available-for-sale investments based on Visa U.S.A.’s estimates of when those funds will be needed. As of March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006, September 30, 2005, and September 30, 2004, Visa U.S.A.’s total liquid assets were $1.8 billion $1.4 billion, $1.1 billion, and $708 million, respectively, as reflected in the following table:

In Millions	March 31, 2007		September 30, 2006		September 30, 2005		September 30, 2004
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	386	$	270	$	135	$	174
Short-Term Investments Securities, Available-for-Sale		1,026		660		681		156
Long-Term Investments Securities, Available-for-Sale		356		515		319		378
Total Current Assets		2,041		1,594		1,478		920
Total Current Liabilities		1,263		1,393		1,325		1,070
Long-Term Debt		32		41		74		106
Long-Term Portion of Accrued Litigation		811		784		1,010		1,019
Total Equity (Deficit)		968		583		126		(230	)
Working capital	$	778	$	201	$	153	$	(150	)

In December 2002, Visa U.S.A. issued $132 million in aggregate principal amount of series A senior secured notes due December 27, 2007 and $68 million in aggregate principal amount of series B senior secured notes due December 27, 2012. Visa U.S.A.’s payment obligations under the senior secured notes are secured by Visa U.S.A.’s facility in Colorado, which consists of two data centers and an office building, processing assets and developed software. In addition, Visa U.S.A. is subject to certain financial and other covenants, that include restrictions on: (i) mergers, consolidations and the conveyance transfer or lease of substantially all of Visa U.S.A.’s assets, (ii) transactions with affiliates, (iii) maintaining consolidated accumulated net revenues of at least $300 million, and (iv) certain leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios.

The interest on the senior secured notes is payable quarterly in March, June, September, and December. In May 2004, Visa U.S.A. executed an amendment and waiver to the note purchase agreement governing the series A and series B senior secured notes, which: (1) increased the interest rate on the series A senior secured

230

notes from 4.64% to 5.39% and the series B senior secured notes from 5.60% to 6.35%, (2) added certain other financial covenant requirements associated with net income, liquidity and payments volume and (3) required Visa U.S.A. to maintain an irrevocable standby letter of credit of up to 30% of the principal amount of senior secured notes outstanding, until Visa U.S.A. met certain financial covenant requirements. During the second quarter of 2006, Visa U.S.A. met the financial covenants and was no longer required to retain the letter of credit. Interest rates were reduced back to 4.64% on the series A senior secured notes and to 5.60% on the series B senior secured notes. In addition, as a result, Visa U.S.A. is no longer required to meet the other financial covenants required by the May 2004 amendment. As of March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, Visa U.S.A. was in compliance with all covenants in connection with the series A and series B senior secured notes. The total debt outstanding under the series A and series B senior secured notes was $58 million, $74 million, and $106 million as of March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006, and September 30, 2005, respectively.

Visa U.S.A.’s debt-to-equity ratio, inclusive of accrued litigation, decreased to 1.1 to 1.0 at March 31, 2007 from 1.8 to 1.0 at September 30, 2006, and 10.5 to 1.0 at September 30, 2005. Between fiscal 2006 and the period ended March 31, 2007, the ratio improved as Visa U.S.A.’s equity position improved to $968 million at March 31, 2007 from $583 million at September 30, 2006, reflecting continued growth in net income and payment on outstanding indebtedness. Between fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006 the ratio improved as Visa U.S.A.’s equity position improved to $583 million in fiscal 2006 from $126 million in fiscal 2005. Visa U.S.A. also has an uncommitted credit facility with Visa International whereby Visa U.S.A. or Visa International may provide each other short-term financing with a maximum term of five business days. Neither Visa U.S.A. nor Visa International has the obligation to lend to or to borrow from the other company. There were no outstanding balances as of March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 or September 30, 2005 under this arrangement.

In July 2006, Visa U.S.A.’s board of directors approved a plan to build a new data center on the east coast of the United States at an estimated cost of $397.0 million, which Visa U.S.A. plans to fund with its existing liquid assets and projected cash flows. Visa U.S.A. expects to complete the land purchase in fiscal 2007 and anticipates that construction will begin shortly thereafter and continue through fiscal 2010. Upon completion, Visa U.S.A. will migrate its current east coast data center to this new facility. Visa U.S.A. assesses the estimated cost to build the new data center on a regular basis and the corresponding liquidity required during each stage of the build process. As of March 31, 2007, Visa U.S.A. had executed construction agreements totaling $64.0 million of the $397.0 million estimated to complete the new data center. During March 2007, Visa U.S.A. also executed two performance bond agreements with the county in which the east coast data center will be constructed to provide assurance that land development and construction will be completed as planned. The bonds have a total value of $2 million and become due in the event that land development and construction are not completed as planned.

Visa U.S.A. believes its existing liquid assets and projected cash flows will be sufficient to fund Visa U.S.A.’s operations, working capital requirements, capital expenditures, and future strategic developments during fiscal 2007. Visa U.S.A. may choose to raise additional funds via new or increased fees or additional financing. Visa U.S.A.’s ability to maintain these levels of liquidity could be adversely affected by several factors described under “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this proxy statement—prospectus, including the adverse outcome of any of the legal or regulatory proceedings to which Visa U.S.A. is a party. Visa U.S.A. will continue to assess its liquidity position and potential sources of supplemental liquidity in view of its operating performance and other relevant circumstances.

Visa U.S.A. has certain off-balance sheet commitments and contingencies that may have significant future cash requirements. For additional information about commitment and contingent liabilities, see the discussion in “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations” below and in Notes 13, 14, 17 and 18 to the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A., and in Note 10 to the March 31, 2007 unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.

231

Cash Flow Data

In Millions	Six Months Ended March 31,						For the Years Ended September 30,
	2007			2006			2006			2005			2004
	(Unaudited)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	$	385		$	321		$	434		$	481		$	433
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(251	)		(261	)		(263	)		(473	)		(306	)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities		(18	)		(18	)		(36	)		(46	)		(39	)
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	116		$	42		$	135		$	(38	)	$	88

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $64 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior year period, primarily reflecting increases in operating net income, offset by the impact of lower non-cash items over the previous year such as amortization for volume and support agreements and accrued litigation obligation.

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $47 million during fiscal 2006, primarily due to payments on litigation matters largely accrued for in fiscal 2005 but settled and paid for in fiscal 2006. In addition, lower levels of accounts payable and accrued liabilities in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 contributed to the decrease in cash provided by operating activities. These decreases were offset by increases in the liability position of volume and support agreements, and higher net income, adjusted for non-cash items.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $48 million during fiscal 2005. Excluding the impact of member deposits on cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2004, net cash provided by operating activities increased $204 million in fiscal 2005, fueled primarily by fiscal 2005 net income, non-cash charges including the litigation provision, and higher levels of accounts payable and accrued liabilities at the end of fiscal 2005. Cash generated from operating activities in fiscal 2004 primarily reflects member deposits, which increased $156 million, under the member deposit program where members could choose to advance a deposit against their quarterly member service fees at a discount. For further information, see Note 17 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.

Investing Activities

The decrease in net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2007 primarily reflects more investment sales and maturities over investment purchases during the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior year period. Excess proceeds generated from operating activities and investing activities were primarily used to procure commercial paper and other highly liquid investments classified in cash equivalents.

The decrease in net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2006 from fiscal 2005 primarily reflects fewer funds available for the purchase of investment securities as a result of one-time litigation settlements, including the multi-currency matter.

The increase in net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2005 from fiscal 2004 primarily reflects more investment of operating cash flows in income-generating investment securities during the year.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was substantially unchanged in the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior year period, and primarily reflected scheduled quarterly payments on Visa U.S.A.’s series A senior secured notes due 2007 and series B senior secured notes due 2012.

232

Net cash used in financing activities during fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 primarily reflects scheduled quarterly payments on Visa U.S.A.’s series A senior secured notes due 2007 and series B senior secured notes due 2012. For further information, see Note 14 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. Cash requirements remained stable as the outstanding debt decreased during fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Under Visa U.S.A.’s current bylaws, Visa U.S.A. indemnifies issuing and acquiring members for settlement losses suffered by reason of the failure of any other member to honor drafts, travelers checks, or other instruments processed in accordance with its operating regulations. Visa International is Visa U.S.A.’s settlement agent. Visa U.S.A. partially indemnifies Visa International from losses due to the failure of a member. The term of the indemnity is not limited. Visa U.S.A. is responsible for losses up to $1.0 million plus .003% of Visa U.S.A.’s sales volume for the year preceding the loss, or approximately $37 million in fiscal 2006.

In conjunction with Visa U.S.A.’s purchase of Inovant, Inc. from Visa International on January 1, 2003, Visa U.S.A. agreed to indemnify Visa International in the event of future tax liability in connection with an adverse determination by a taxing authority resulting from the sale of stock of Inovant, Inc. The indemnification is effective for ten years and extends through thirty years or the statute of limitation in the event of a tax extension for the year of the stock repurchase. The maximum probability-weighted liability is considered immaterial and no liability has been accrued for this obligation.

Visa U.S.A. has no special purpose entities or off-balance sheet debt, other than operating leases and purchase order commitments entered into in the ordinary course of business and reflected in the contractual obligation table below.

Contractual Obligations

Visa U.S.A.’s contractual commitments will have an impact on its future liquidity. The contractual obligations identified in the table below include both on-and off-balance sheet transactions that represent material expected or contractually committed future obligations at the end of fiscal 2006. Visa U.S.A. believes that it will be able to fund these obligations through cash generated from operations and its existing cash balances.

In Millions
Payments Due by Period	Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years		Total
Purchase Orders1	$	357	$	16	$	1	$	—	$	374
Operating Leases2		11		13		10		1		35
Equipment and Licenses2		20		17		—		—		37
Capital Leases3		4		4		—		—		8
Volumes and Support Agreements4:
Member		400		811		507		118		1,836
Other		155		175		132		81		543
Litigation Payments5		231		421		410		200		1,262
Debt6		33		20		14		9		76
Total	$	1,211	$	1,477	$	1,074	$	409	$	4,171

1 Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased and fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.

2 Visa U.S.A. leases certain premises such as its data centers, certain regional offices, and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with varying expiration dates.

233

3 Visa U.S.A. entered into a capital lease for certain computer equipment in fiscal 2005. Visa U.S.A. is financing the acquisition of the underlying assets through the leases and accordingly they are recorded on Visa U.S.A.’s consolidated balance sheets.

4 Visa U.S.A. generally has non-cancelable agreements with members and merchants for various programs designed to build sales volume and increase payment acceptance. These agreements, which range in term from one to thirteen years, provide card issuance, marketing, and program support based on specific performance requirements.

5 Represents amounts due in accordance with settlement agreements in the Retailers’ Litigation and other litigation settlements.

6 Represents maturities on Visa U.S.A.’s series A and series B senior secured notes.

For further information about Visa U.S.A.’s contractual commitments, see Notes 14, 17, and 18 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. and Note 10 to the March 31, 2007 unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.

Visa U.S.A. also has obligations with respect to its pension and postretirement benefit plans, and other incentive plans. For further information, see Note 13 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A.

Related Parties

Visa U.S.A. conducts business as a non-stock, non-assessable membership corporation. The principal members of Visa U.S.A. are approximately 1,700 financial institutions that participate directly in Visa U.S.A.’s payment programs. In addition, there are approximately 11,700 associate and participant members that participate in Visa U.S.A.’s payment programs through one or more principal members.

Visa U.S.A.’s board of directors is comprised of ex-officio directors, individuals who are also officers of various member financial institutions that are also Visa U.S.A.’s customers and independent directors. Visa U.S.A. generated total operating revenues of approximately $808.1 million, $884.4 million, and $634.0 million from financial institutions with officers that also serve on its board of directors in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. During fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, a significant portion of Visa U.S.A.’s operating revenues were generated from one customer with an officer that also serves on the board of directors. Net operating revenues from this customer were approximately $408 million or 14%, $345 million or 13% and $219 million or 9% of Visa U.S.A.’s total operating revenues in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of Visa U.S.A.’s total operating revenues in fiscal 2006, 2005, or 2004. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, two customers accounted for 10% or more of Visa U.S.A.’s total operating revenues. For further information see Note 19 to the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements and Note 9 to the March 31, 2007 unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. The loss of these customers could adversely impact Visa U.S.A.’s operating revenues and operating income.

Seasonality

Visa U.S.A. does not experience a pronounced seasonality in its business. No individual quarter of fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005, or fiscal 2004 has historically accounted for more than 30% of annual revenues.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Visa U.S.A.’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Note 2 to the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A., describes the significant accounting

234

policies and methods used in the preparation of Visa U.S.A.’s consolidated financial statements. Visa U.S.A. has established policies and control procedures to make estimates and assumptions that are appropriately governed and are applied consistently from period to period. The following is a brief description of Visa U.S.A.’s current accounting policies involving significant management judgment. These estimates require difficult and subjective judgments, including whether estimates are required to be made about matters that are inherently uncertain, if different estimates reasonably could have been used, or if changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur could materially impact the financial statements.

Management believes that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to fully understand and evaluate Visa U.S.A.’s reported financial results, as they require management’s most subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Critical Estimates	Assumptions and Judgment	Impact if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Revenue Recognition Certain revenue discounts and volume-based support incentives are estimated.	Certain contractual discounts and incentives to Visa U.S.A.’s customers are recorded based on an estimate of the customers’ future performance. Differences are adjusted in the period Visa U.S.A.’s customer reports its results or in the period when updated customer performance information is available. Customers’ future performance is estimated by using member reported information, transactional information accumulated from Visa U.S.A.’s systems, historical information, and discussions with Visa U.S.A.’s customers.	If the customers’ actual performance is not consistent with Visa U.S.A.’s estimates, revenue discounts and incentives, which are recorded as a reduction of revenue, including volume and support agreements, may be materially different than initially recorded.
Pension Certain assumptions are used in the determination of Visa U.S.A.’s annual pension costs and the disclosure of the funded position of Visa U.S.A.’s pension plan. Visa U.S.A. evaluates these critical assumptions at least annually and relies on the expertise of actuarial consultants when making these critical assumptions. Key assumptions include the discount rate used to measure the plan’s projected benefit obligation and the expected rate of return on plan assets. Visa U.S.A.’s discount rate is based on matching the duration of corporate bond pools to the expected pension payment stream. The discount rate	Visa U.S.A. utilized a pension discount rate of 6.23% in measuring the projected benefit obligation in fiscal 2006 and in calculating the net periodic pension cost. The expected rate of return on plan assets in fiscal 2006 is 7.50%.	Actual results may differ from actuarial assumptions because of economic and other factors. The impact of these differences are accumulated and amortized over future periods. A quarter of a percentage point decrease in the discount rate would increase pension expense by $4.5 million in fiscal 2006. An equal, but opposite effect would be experienced for a quarter of a point increase in the discount rate. A quarter of a point increase or decrease in expected rate of return on plan assets would decrease or increase pension cost, respectively, by $1.0 million in fiscal 2006.

235

Critical Estimates	Assumptions and Judgment	Impact if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
enables Visa U.S.A. to state the present value of the expected future cash flows on the measurement date. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases pension expense. The expected rate of return on plan assets is based on current and expected asset allocation, as well as the long-term historical risks and returns associated with each asset class within the plan portfolio. A lower expected rate of return on plan assets increases pension cost while a higher expected rate of return has the opposite effect.
Postretirement Certain assumptions are used in the determination of Visa U.S.A.’s annual postretirement costs. Key assumptions include the discount rate used to measure the plan’s projected benefit obligation and projected increase in future healthcare costs. Visa U.S.A. relies on the expertise of actuarial consultants when making these critical assumptions.	Visa U.S.A. utilized a postretirement discount rate of 6.16% in measuring the projected benefit obligation in fiscal 2006 and in calculating the postretirement benefit cost. The annual rate of future increases in per capita cost of health benefits for postretirement was 7% in fiscal 2006. The rate is then assumed to decrease 1% over the next year.	A quarter of a percentage point decrease in the discount rate would increase postretirement expense by $0.2 million in fiscal 2006. An equal, but opposite effect would be experienced for a quarter of a point increase in the discount rate. Increasing the health care cost trend by 1% would increase the postretirement accumulated plan benefit obligation by $1.1 million and service and interest cost by $0.4 million in fiscal 2006. Decreasing the health care cost trend by 1% would decrease the postretirement accumulated plan benefit obligation by $1.0 million and service and interest cost by $0.3 million in fiscal 2006.
Legal Matters Visa U.S.A. is a party to legal proceedings with respect to a variety of matters. Except as described in Note 18 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A., Visa U.S.A. does not believe that any legal proceeding to which Visa U.S.A. is a party would have a material adverse impact on Visa U.S.A.’s business.	Visa U.S.A. evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome of legal proceedings to which Visa U.S.A. is party in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (SFAS 5). Visa U.S.A.’s records a liability in its consolidated financial statements for legal and regulatory actions when a loss is known or considered probable and	Due to the inherent uncertainties of the legal and regulatory process in the multiple jurisdictions in which Visa U.S.A. operates, its judgments may be materially different than the actual outcomes.

236

Critical Estimates	Assumptions and Judgment	Impact if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
	the amount can be reasonably estimated. Visa U.S.A.’s judgments are subjective based on the status of the legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of Visa U.S.A.’s defenses, and consultation with in-house and outside legal counsel.
Discount Rate for Litigation Settlement For litigation settlements to be paid over periods longer than one year, Visa U.S.A. discounts the projected payments when recording its litigation in the consolidated balance sheets. Note 18 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. contains a complete discussion of Legal Matters.	Visa U.S.A. estimates the discount rates it uses to calculate the present value of its long-term litigation. The discount rates used are a matter of management judgment at the time of settlement, which considers Visa U.S.A.’s estimated post-settlement incremental borrowing rate for sources of credit that could be used to finance the payment of such obligations with similar terms. The discount rate used for the Retailers’ Litigation settlements in fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2005 is 7.25%. The discount rate used for other litigation matters settled in fiscal 2006 is 5.87%.	A quarter of a percentage point reduction or increase in the discount rate would increase or decrease annual interest expense, respectively, by $2.1 million in fiscal 2006, and by declining amounts thereafter. In addition, a quarter of a percentage point change in the discount rate would have impacted the amount Visa U.S.A. recorded as litigation provision for fiscal 2006 by $6.2 million.
Credit and Debit Settlement Guarantee Subject to Visa U.S.A.’s bylaws and operating regulations, Visa U.S.A. indemnifies issuing and acquiring members for settlement losses suffered by reason of the failure of any other member to honor drafts, travelers checks, or other instruments processed in accordance with Visa U.S.A.’s Operating Regulations. Note 17 to the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial of Visa U.S.A. describes the methodology Visa U.S.A. uses to estimate Visa U.S.A.’s liability for this guarantee.	Visa U.S.A. is required to make judgments as to the probability of failure, and estimated loss in the event of default in estimating its liability for the settlement guarantee.	The methodology Visa U.S.A. uses to estimate Visa U.S.A.’s liability for settlement guarantee incorporates: average settlement time, historical sales volume, independent estimates of probability of insolvency, and an estimate of loss in the event of default similar to that recommended by the FDIC for unsecured loans. An increase in the estimate of loss in the event of default to 100% would increase Visa U.S.A.’s estimated liability by $0.4 million at the end of fiscal 2006.

237

Critical Estimates	Assumptions and Judgment	Impact if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Capitalized Internally-Developed Software Visa U.S.A.’s capitalized software, which includes internal and external costs incurred in developing computer software for internal use, is included in facilities, equipment, and software, net on Visa U.S.A.’s consolidated balance sheets. Note 2 to the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. contains a discussion of Visa U.S.A.’s accounting policies for internally developed software.	Visa U.S.A. is required to make judgments as to the timing of stages of development and future economic useful life for internally developed software. On an ongoing basis, Visa U.S.A. performs impairment analyses of various technologies. If the carrying value of internally developed software exceeds the fair value, impairment charges are recorded.	Note 9 of the fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. contains a discussion of impairment to internally developed software in fiscal 2006. The net carrying value of internally developed software on Visa U.S.A.’s consolidated balance sheets at the end of fiscal 2006 is $37.1 million.
Income Taxes In calculating its effective tax rate Visa U.S.A. makes decisions regarding certain tax positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and allocations of income among various tax jurisdictions. Visa U.S.A. records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.	Visa U.S.A. has various tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and credits, the establishment of reserves for audit matters, and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. Visa U.S.A. considered projected future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance.	Although Visa U.S.A. believes that its estimates and judgments are reasonable, actual results may differ from these estimates. If Visa U.S.A. realizes a deferred tax asset in excess of the net deferred tax asset or Visa U.S.A. were unable to realize a net deferred tax asset, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase or decrease earnings, respectively, in the period the difference is recognized.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2006. Visa U.S.A. is in the process of determining the effect, if any, of adopting FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157), which defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, Visa U.S.A. is in the process of determining the effect, if any, of adopting SFAS 157 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R))” (SFAS 158), which amends FASB issued Statement No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” (SFAS 87) and FASB issued Statement No. 106, ”Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” (SFAS 106) to require recognition of the over-funded or under-funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the balance sheet. Under SFAS 158, gains and losses, prior service costs and credits, and any

238

remaining transition amounts under SFAS 87 and SFAS 106 that have not yet been recognized through net periodic benefit cost will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax effects, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic cost. In addition, the measurement date, the date at which the benefit obligation and plan assets are measured, is required to be the company’s fiscal year end. Visa U.S.A. currently uses a measurement date of June 30. SFAS 158 is effective for non-public companies for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007 (December 15, 2006 for public companies), except for the measurement date provisions, which are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Visa U.S.A. will adopt the balance sheet recognition provisions of SFAS 158 at September 30, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 158 would increase pension liability and reduce equity, pre-tax, by approximately $119 million at September 30, 2007, based on 2006 pension plan measurements. Visa U.S.A. will also elect to early adopt the provision to conform the plan’s measurement date to its fiscal year end, and accordingly will record a charge of approximately $16 million, pre-tax, to equity in the last quarter of the fiscal year. These estimates are actuarially calculated, based on current assumptions for the plans, and assume there will be no modifications, amendments, or other significant changes to the plans. Actual results will likely differ from these estimates.

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment to SFAS 115” (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows the measurement of many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis under a fair value option. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2007. Visa U.S.A. is in the process of determining the effect, if any, of adopting SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial statements.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk is the potential loss arising from changes in market rates and market prices. Visa U.S.A. is exposed to two significant market risks that could affect its business including: changes in interest rates and equity prices. Visa U.S.A. does not hold or enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

A significant portion of Visa U.S.A.’s investment portfolio assets is held in fixed-income securities. These assets are reflected as cash equivalents, short-term available-for-sale investments, and long-term available-for-sale investments. Visa U.S.A. does not consider its cash and cash equivalents or its auction rate securities to be subject to significant market risks, as amounts consist of liquid investments with original maturities or repricing characteristics of three months or less. The fair value balances of Visa U.S.A.’s interest rate sensitive assets as of March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006, and September 30, 2005 include:

	March 31, 2007		September 30,
			2006			2005
	(in millions, except percentages)
Government-Sponsored Entities	1,179			895			750
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds	31			249			217
Total	1,210		$	1,144		$	967
Percentage of Total Assets	37	%		39	%		35	%

Visa U.S.A. manages its exposure to interest rate risk by investing primarily in rate-adjustable, government-issued securities of high credit quality. However, Visa U.S.A.’s efforts do not provide complete assurance that it will be protected from interest rate fluctuations. A sharp rise in interest rates could have a significant impact on the fair value of Visa U.S.A.’s investment portfolio.

239

The following tables present the hypothetical changes in fair value in Visa U.S.A.’s investment portfolio as of March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006, and September 30, 2005 due to potential changes in interest rates.

	Fair Value Given Interest Rate Decrease of:				Fair Value as of March 31, 2007		Fair Value Given Interest Rate Increase of:
	(in millions, except percentages)
	1%		0.5%				0.5%		1%
U.S. Government Agency Notes	$	1,183	$	1,182	$	1,179	$	1,173	$	1,165
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds		31		31		31		31		31
Total	$	1,214	$	1,213	$	1,210	$	1,204	$	1,196
	Fair Value Given Interest Rate Decrease of:				Fair Value as of September 30, 2006		Fair Value Given Interest Rate Increase of:
	(in millions, except percentages)
	1%		0.5%				0.5%		1%
U.S. Government Agency Notes	$	899	$	897	$	895	$	892	$	885
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds		251		250		249		248		247
Total	$	1,150	$	1,147	$	1,144	$	1,140	$	1,132
	Fair Value Given Interest Rate Decrease of:				Fair Value as of September 30, 2005		Fair Value Given Interest Rate Increase of:
	(in millions, except percentages)
	1%		0.5%				0.5%		1%
U.S. Government Agency Notes	$	755	$	753	$	750	$	747	$	744
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds		219		218		217		216		216
Total	$	974	$	971	$	967	$	963	$	960

Equity Price Risk

Visa U.S.A. owns equity securities which are selected to offset obligations in connection with Visa U.S.A.’s long-term incentive and deferred compensation plans. Equity securities primarily consist of mutual fund investments related to various employee compensation plans. For these plans, employees bear the risk of market fluctuations. Gains and losses experienced on these equity investments are offset by increases or reductions in personnel expense, respectively. The effect of a hypothetical 10% change in market value would have increased or decreased unrealized losses and personnel expense, respectively, by $6 million at March 31, 2007, and by $3 million at September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005.

240

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND STATISTICAL DATA OF VISA CANADA

The selected Visa Canada consolidated statement of financial position data as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated statements of operations data for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006, presented below have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus, which were prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. The selected Visa Canada consolidated statement of financial position data as of September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated statements of operations data for each of the fiscal years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2003, presented below have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada, which are not included in this proxy statement-prospectus. Consolidated financial data presented below as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, have been derived from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada included in this proxy statement-prospectus and, in the opinion of Visa Canada’s management, contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of Visa Canada’s financial position and results of operations for such periods. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future and results for the six months ended March 31, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of, and are not projections for, the results to be expected for the full year ending September 30, 2007.

The selected financial data in the tables below has been derived from Visa Canada’s audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP, which differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. These differences have a material effect on the net income and composition of net assets and are summarized in Note 11 to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Visa Canada as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, and Note 12 to the audited consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

The selected statistical operating data presented below is unaudited. The selected statistical operating data do not purport to indicate results of operations as of any future date or for any future period.

Total volume figures are based on operating certificates compiled and reported by Visa Canada’s members. All operating certificate data is subject to revision and amendment by Visa Canada’s members subsequent to the date of its release. These revisions are reflected in the information presented below. Service fees are assessed for each quarter using a calculation of pricing applied to the prior quarter’s total volume, therefore total volume data accumulated from Visa Canada’s members over the twelve-month periods ended June 30 is used as the basis for recording service fee revenue during fiscal years ending September 30. Total volume data for the six month periods ended December 31 is used as the basis for recording service fee revenue during the six month periods ending March 31. Total volume represents all point of sale and cash volumes charged on cards issued by Visa Canada members and carrying marks of the Visa brand.

The messages processed figures in the table below are sourced from VisaNet, the processing platform that processes the transactions of Visa Canada’s members. These figures represent the number of messages processed during the period.

The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Visa Canada Association” and Visa Canada’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

241

Since its inception, Visa Canada has not declared or paid any dividends.

	Six Months Ended March 31,			For the Years Ended September 30,
	2007	2006		2006		2005	2004	2003		2002
(in Cdn$ thousands)	(unaudited)			(audited)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data
Total revenues	67,840	61,326		121,966		120,552	110,994	106,531		100,407
Operating expenses	53,693	62,508		121,633		116,978	107,239	110,197		96,943
Excess/(deficiency) of revenue over expenses	13,946	(1,534	)	(1,423	)	2,763	1,917	(4,909	)	3,464
	At March 31,			At September 30,
	2007	2006		2006		2005	2004	2003		2002
(in Cdn$ thousands)	(unaudited)			(audited)
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position Data
Total assets	37,044	19,258		25,513		25,117	21,144	17,545		19,110
Net assets	23,625	9,588		9,699		11,122	8,359	6,442		11,351
Working capital	19,615	6,466		5,992		8,646	7,001	4,987		11,096
	Six Months Ended March 31,			For the Years Ended September 30,
	2007	2006		2006		2005	2004	2003		2002
Operating Data (unaudited)
Total volume (in Cdn$ millions)	89,010	80,063		159,800		142,501	129,304	116,900		105,026
Percentage change:	11.2	11.5		12.1		10.2	10.6	11.3		7.9
Messages processed (in millions)	1,350	1,229		2,555		2,364	2,153	2,066		2,056
Percentage change:	9.9	8.4		8.1		9.8	4.2	0.5		13.1

242

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION

This management’s discussion and analysis provides a review of the results of operations, the financial condition and the liquidity and capital resources of Visa Canada and its subsidiary. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Visa Canada’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus. Amounts in certain tables may not calculate due to rounding.

Visa Canada prepares its financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP which differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For an explanation of the material differences between Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP, see Note 11 to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Visa Canada as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and Note 12 to the audited consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 and for the three years ended September 30, 2006, 2005, and 2004, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Overview

Visa Canada is a membership association headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, made up of 24 member financial institutions. Visa Canada was incorporated under the laws of Ontario on September 22, 1989, and is a not-for-profit organization exempt from Canadian corporate income taxes, provided certain requirements are met.

Visa Canada is the sole owner of VCA Inovant Investments Inc., a U.S. subsidiary, which in turn holds a 5% equity interest in Inovant. Inovant operates VisaNet, the transaction processing platform that provides message processing and related services to members of Visa Canada, and is a majority owned subsidiary of Visa U.S.A. VCA Inovant Investments Inc. is subject to U.S. corporate income tax on its share of Inovant’s taxable earnings. The current portion of its U.S. corporate income taxes is included on Visa Canada’s consolidated statement of operations as a provision for current income taxes.

Visa Canada administers a payments system in Canada, including various card products and travelers cheques, which are identified by the various Visa brand marks. In Canada, Visa Canada’s members currently issue credit and prepaid payment cards, and travelers cheques. No Visa debit cards have been issued by Visa Canada’s members to date. Visa Canada’s role is to advance new payment products and technologies on behalf of its member financial institutions. Visa Canada has an agreement with Inovant whereby Inovant provides transaction processing services for the benefit of Visa Canada’s members. Visa International, of which Visa Canada is a group member, also provides certain services to Visa Canada to support the payments system that Visa Canada administers. These services include settlement, brand, sponsorship, product platform, risk, and technology development and management activities of a global nature.

Visa Canada’s operating revenues are primarily derived from service fees and data processing revenues. Visa Canada does not issue cards, set fees or determine the interest rates that consumers will be charged on Visa branded cards. Issuing members have the responsibility for determining these and most other competitive card features. In addition, Visa Canada does not generally solicit merchants directly or establish the fees that merchants are charged for card acceptance, including the merchant discount rate. Both of these functions are generally the responsibility of acquiring members.

As a not-for profit association, Visa Canada does not aim to generate a profit and has historically set its prices so that revenues are sufficient to cover its expected costs. Visa Canada’s total revenues are driven primarily by its total volume and the number of messages processed. In fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006, growth rates of those revenue drivers exceeded the growth rate of Visa Canada’s operating expenses, and consequently Visa Canada reduced its effective prices in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006 to achieve its objective of breaking even financially. Visa Canada generated a non-zero net income/(loss) during those periods, however, because total volume, the number of messages processed, and its total operating expenses differed from the estimates used to

243

make pricing decisions at the beginning of the year. In the six months ended March 31, 2007, growth rates of Visa Canada’s total volume and messages processed were again greater than the growth rate of its operating expenses, but prices were kept the same as during fiscal 2006 to allow Visa Canada to build capital for its transition to a for-profit enterprise. After the completion of the restructuring and the transfer of Visa Canada into Visa Inc. as a subsidiary of Visa Inc., Visa Canada expects to operate its business as a for-profit corporation in a way that maximizes stockholder value and therefore expects that its pricing methodologies will be changed accordingly.

Visa Canada has historically maintained rules that restrict members from issuing both Visa and certain other card association-branded credit cards. In February 2006, Visa Canada changed those rules to allow member financial institutions to issue all other card associations’ brands. Since that date, no Visa Canada members have joined another card association. However, this change may pose a risk to the future growth of Visa Canada’s revenues.

Approximately one-third of Visa Canada’s revenues are generated, and one-third of expenses are incurred, in U.S. dollars. Visa Canada earns all data processing revenues and a substantial portion of other member and other revenues in U.S. dollars, because the underlying services are charged through a global, U.S. dollar based billing system and services are often priced off of a standard U.S. dollar rate globally. Visa Canada’s direct expenses, associated with services provided by Visa International and Inovant are incurred in U.S. dollars. All revenues and expenses are reported in Visa Canada’s financial statements in Canadian dollars, so the level and growth thereof may be affected by foreign exchange rate movements. In recent periods, the U.S. dollar has weakened against the Canadian dollar, which has had a negative effect on Visa Canada’s revenue and a positive effect on its direct expenses. The impact of foreign exchange rates on Visa Canada’s net income has not been material, as U.S. dollar revenues and expenses have been approximately equal.

References to net income in this management’s discussion and analysis should be read as references to the excess/(deficiency) of revenue over expenses as presented in Visa Canada’s consolidated financial statements. Net income for the six months ended March 31, 2007, was Cdn$13.9 million, an increase of Cdn$15.5 million from the comparable period of fiscal 2006. Results in the first half of fiscal 2007 as compared to the same period of fiscal 2006 reflect the positive impacts of a 10.6% increase in revenues and a 14.1% decrease in operating expenses. Revenues benefited from 11.2% growth in total volume and 9.9% growth in the number of messages processed in the first half of fiscal 2007, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2006. The decrease in operating expenses in the first half of fiscal 2007 over the comparable period in fiscal 2006 reflects primarily reduced advertising and promotion activity.

Visa Canada’s net loss in fiscal 2006 was Cdn$1.4 million, a decrease of Cdn$4.2 million from fiscal 2005 net income of Cdn$2.8 million. This decrease resulted from a 4.0% increase in operating expenses, which was only partially offset by a 1.2% increase in total revenue. The increase in total revenue in fiscal 2006 was due primarily to total volume growth of 12.1% in fiscal 2006 over fiscal 2005, and the 8.1% increase in the number of messages processed during the same period. Total volume and messages processed growth were offset partially by pricing reductions implemented in January 2005 so that Visa Canada could achieve its not-for-profit objective, lower distributions from Inovant, and an appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar. Operating expenses increased by 4.0% in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005, as lower direct expenses were more than offset by higher marketing and other operating expenses.

Results of Operations

Total Revenues

Visa Canada’s total revenues are derived from member revenue, which is comprised of service fees, data processing fees and other member revenue, as well as other revenue.

Member Revenue

Service fees—Service fees reflect payments by members of Visa Canada with respect to their payments programs carrying marks of the Visa brand. Service fees are charged to members by Visa Canada based on total

244

volume. Total volume measures the total monetary value of transactions for goods and services purchased with, and cash transactions on, Visa-branded products, as reported by Visa Canada’s members on monthly operating certificates. Cash transactions include cash disbursements, balance transfers and convenience cheque transactions associated with Visa-branded products. Current quarter service fees are assessed using a calculation of pricing applied to prior quarter volumes. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the services are rendered.

Data processing revenues—Data processing revenues represent fees charged to members of Visa Canada for processing messages that facilitate domestic and international transaction authorization, clearing, settlement and information flow with respect to goods and services purchased with, and cash transactions on, Visa branded credit and prepaid products. The majority of these data processing fees relate to messages that facilitate authorization, clearing and settlement of transactions. Fees are charged for both domestic and international authorization, clearing, and settlement. Data processing revenues are based primarily on the number and type of messages processed during a period. Actual processing services are performed by Inovant through an agreement with Visa Canada, and Visa Canada then charges its members for facilitating this processing through Inovant. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.

Other member revenues—Other member revenues represents fees charged to members for other products and services offered by Visa Canada. These products and services include licensing, merchandising, and new member fees, as well as fees charged for certain services that Visa Canada may provide to consumers on behalf of issuers. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.

Other revenue

Other revenue consists of card recovery bulletin fees, interest from fixed-income investments, distributions from Inovant and fees on international multi-currency transactions.

Six Months Ended March 31, 2007, compared to Six Months Ended March 31, 2006

Total Revenue

Total revenues were Cdn$67.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007, which is an increase of Cdn$6.5 million or 10.6%, compared to Cdn$61.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006. The increase was primarily due to higher service fees and data processing revenues.

The following table reflects the components of total revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively:

					2007 vs. 2006
Six months ended March 31,	2007		2006		Cdn$ Change			% Change
(Unaudited)	(in thousands, except percentages)
Member Revenue
Service fees	Cdn$	45.8	Cdn$	41.2	Cdn$	4.6		11.1	%
Data processing revenues		15.2		13.4		1.8		13.8	%
Other member revenues		2.0		2.3		(0.3	)	(12.9	%)
		63.0		56.9		6.1		10.8	%
Other revenue
Card recovery bulletin fees		4.0		3.7		0.3		8.2	%
Interest		0.4		0.3		0.1		46.7	%
Other		0.4		0.4		0.1		(14.8	%)
		4.8		4.4		0.4		8.6	%
Total revenues	Cdn$	67.8	Cdn$	61.3	Cdn$	6.5		10.6	%

245

Member Revenue

Revenues generated from members increased by Cdn$6.1 million or 10.8% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006, due to higher service fees and data processing revenues, which were offset only slightly by lower other member revenues.

Service fees—Service fee revenues increased by Cdn$4.6 million or 11.1% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006. The increase was due to 11.2% higher total volumes, as prices remained the same during the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same period in fiscal 2006.

Data processing revenues—Data processing revenues increased by Cdn$1.8 million or 13.8% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to a 9.9% increase in the number of messages processed.

Other member revenue—Other member revenue decreased by Cdn$0.3 million or 12.9% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to lower new member fees and merchandise revenue.

Other Revenue

Other revenue increased by Cdn$0.4 million or 8.6% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006. The increase was related primarily to an 8.2% increase in card recovery bulletin revenues, which resulted from an 8.5% increase in card recovery bulletin listings.

Operating Expenses

Visa Canada’s operating expenses are comprised of advertising and marketing expenses, direct expenses comprised of fees to affiliates of Visa Canada, and other operating expenses. Total operating expenses decreased by Cdn$8.8 million or 14.1% for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to lower advertising and marketing expenses.

The following table reflects total operating expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively:

					2007 vs. 2006
Six months ended March 31,	2007		2006		Cdn$ Change			% Change
(Unaudited)	(in thousands, except percentages)
Advertising and marketing	Cdn$	18.5	Cdn$	27.4	Cdn$	(8.9	)	(32.4	%)
Direct expenses		20.2		20.1		0.1		0.6	%
Other operating expenses		15.0		15.1		(0.1	)	(0.3	%)
Total operating expenses	Cdn$	53.7	Cdn$	62.5	Cdn$	(8.8	)	(14.1	)%

Advertising and Marketing

Advertising and marketing costs represent the largest portion of operating expenses. Advertising and marketing costs decreased by Cdn$8.9 million or 32.4% for the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006. Visa Canada had increased its advertising and marketing expenses by 34.3% from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2006 in response to competitive pressures in the Canadian payments market. Those pressures have since lessened and consequently Visa Canada made the strategic decision to significantly reduce its advertising and marketing expenses in fiscal 2007.

246

Direct Expenses

Direct expenses are comprised of fees to affiliates of Visa Canada, Visa International, Inovant, and Visa U.S.A., primarily to Visa International and Inovant, for transaction processing and related services and for global support of Visa branded products and services. Direct expenses also include the cost of certain products and services sold to members, mainly Visa branded merchandise. Direct fees increased Cdn$0.1 million or 0.6% for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006, as higher expenses paid to Inovant and Visa International were offset by lower Visa branded merchandise expenses.

The largest component of direct expenses is fees paid to Inovant. These fees, paid in U.S. dollars, are for authorization, clearing, settlement and other related products and services that facilitate transaction and information management for Visa Canada’s members. Fees to Inovant were Cdn$10.8 million and Cdn$10.6 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which represents a period-over-period increase of Cdn$0.2 million or 2.0%. The increase was due primarily to a 9.9% increase in the number of messages processed and higher spending on local technology development projects, offset by a reduction in unit prices charged by Inovant.

Direct expenses also include U.S. dollar fees paid to Visa International for the various services it performs centrally on behalf of all Visa regions. These services include settlement, brand management, sponsorship, product platform development, risk management, and technology management activities of a global nature. Direct expenses paid to Visa International were Cdn$9.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007, which is up by Cdn$0.1 million from the six months ended March 31, 2006. The Cdn$0.1 million increase is due primarily to higher charges for global technology projects related to security, offset by lower global brand marketing charges.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses consist primarily of personnel, professional, facilities, travel, and other administrative costs. Other operating expenses were Cdn$15.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared with Cdn$15.1 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006, which represents a decrease of Cdn$0.1 million or 0.3%. The decrease was primarily a result of:

• A Cdn$1.2 million reduction in spending on professional services. Professional services expenses were higher in the six months ended March 31, 2006, compared with the six months ended March 31, 2007, because of initiatives undertaken by Visa Canada to assess its organizational and governance structure during fiscal 2006.

• An increase in personnel costs of Cdn$1.3 million, which results from an increase in the average number of full-time employees from 97 to 111, and offsets the above decrease. These full-time employees were necessary to support key product development, interchange, and relationship management initiatives.

• A Cdn$0.7 million reduction in travel and meeting expenses, which was offset by an increase of Cdn$0.4 million in spending on facilities and technology costs.

Provision for Current Income Taxes

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, Visa Canada’s provision for current income taxes was Cdn$0.2 million, down Cdn$0.2 million or 43.0% from the same period in fiscal 2006. This decrease was due to lower current tax expense in Visa Canada’s U.S. subsidiary, related to its 5% share of Inovant’s taxable income.

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2006, compared to Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2005

Total Revenue

Total revenues were Cdn$122.0 million in fiscal 2006, which is an increase of Cdn$1.3 million or 1.1%, compared to Cdn$120.6 million in fiscal 2005, primarily due to higher member revenues which offset a decline in other revenue.

247

The following table reflects the components of total revenues for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005:

					2006 vs. 2005
Years Ended September 30,	2006		2005		Cdn$ Change		% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Member Revenue
Service fees	Cdn$	82.3	Cdn$	74.3	Cdn$  8.0		10.8	%
Data processing revenues		27.0		27.2	(0.2	)	(0.6	)%
Other member revenue		4.3		5.8	(1.5	)	(26.3	)%
		113.6		107.3	6.3		5.9	%
Other revenue
Card recovery bulletin fees		7.0		7.9	(0.9	)	(12.0	)%
Interest		0.6		0.5	0.1		19.9	%
Distributions from Inovant		—		3.1	(3.1	)	(100.0	)%
Other		0.7		1.7	(1.0	)	(61.4	)%
		8.3		13.3	(5.0	)	(37.7	)%
Total revenues	Cdn$	122.0	Cdn$	120.6	Cdn$1.3		1.1	%

Member Revenue

Fees collected from members represented 93% of Visa Canada’s revenues in fiscal 2006, up from 89% in fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2006, revenues generated from members were Cdn$113.6 million, which is an increase of Cdn$6.3 million or 5.9%, compared to Cdn$107.3 million in fiscal 2005. Member revenue increased from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006 due to an increase in service fees, which was partially offset by a decline in data processing revenues and other member revenues.

Service fees—For fiscal 2006, service fees increased to Cdn$82.3 million, representing a Cdn$8.0 million, or 10.8%, increase from the prior year, which was driven primarily by higher total volume. The 10.8% growth in revenue slightly lagged total volume growth of 12.1% for the year due to prices that were held lower in fiscal 2006 than in fiscal 2005 so that Visa Canada could achieve its not-for-profit objective. Visa Canada’s effective service fee rate—the ratio of service fees to total volume—was 1.2% lower in fiscal 2006 than in fiscal 2005.

Data processing revenues—Data processing revenues decreased by Cdn$0.2 million or 0.6% in fiscal 2006, even though the number of messages processed increased by 8.1% during the same period. Data processing revenues growth lagged the growth in the number of messages processed on a percentage basis primarily because data processing fees are levied in U.S. dollars and the U.S. dollar depreciated against the Canadian dollar by 6.6% during fiscal 2006.

Other member revenue—Member revenue from other products and services was Cdn$4.3 million for fiscal 2006, a decrease of Cdn$1.5 million or 26.3% from the prior year. The decrease in fiscal 2006 is due primarily to lower new member fees and merchandising revenue.

Other Revenue

Other revenue was Cdn$8.3 million in fiscal 2006, which represents a decrease of Cdn$5.0 million or 37.7%, from Cdn$13.3 million in fiscal 2005. This decrease relates primarily to the following factors:

• Lower card recovery bulletin revenues due to the full year effect of price reductions implemented in fiscal 2005 and a weaker U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar, and despite a 1.4% increase in total volume.

248

• The absence of a distribution from Inovant in fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005, other revenue included distributions from Inovant totalling Cdn$3.1 million, which are included in the statement of income in accordance with Canadian GAAP.

• Fiscal 2005 other revenue included a one-time customer rebate from Inovant of Cdn$1.0 million.

Operating Expenses

In fiscal 2006, Visa Canada’s total operating expenses increased Cdn$4.7 million or 4.0% from fiscal 2005, due primarily to higher marketing and other operating expenses, offset by lower direct expenses.

The following table reflects total operating expenses for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005:

					2006 vs. 2005
Years Ended September 30,	2006		2005		Cdn$ Change			% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Advertising and marketing	Cdn$	52.2	Cdn$	45.5	Cdn$	6.6		14.6	%
Direct expenses		39.2		42.5		(3.3	)	(7.8	)%
Other operating expenses		30.3		28.9		1.4		4.7	%
Total operating expenses	Cdn$	121.6	Cdn$	117.0	Cdn$	4.7		4.0	%

Advertising and Marketing

Advertising and marketing costs in fiscal 2006 increased Cdn$6.6 million or 14.6% compared to fiscal 2005, due mainly to:

• Growth in advertising and promotional spending, related to the 2006 Olympic Winter Games, brand differentiation, and Visa Canada’s commercial card business.

• The sponsorship of new Canadian athletes on Team Visa.

• A heightened focus on driving cardholder usage in key acceptance areas such as healthcare and retail.

• Costs associated with the launch of a new Visa logo and new brand standards globally.

Direct Expenses

Direct expenses decreased by Cdn$3.3 million or 7.8% from fiscal 2005, to Cdn$39.2 million for fiscal 2006, due primarily to a decrease in fees paid to both Inovant and Visa International.

Fees to Inovant decreased Cdn$0.7 million or 3.0% to Cdn$21.7 million in fiscal 2006, as compared with fiscal 2005. This decrease was the result of a reduction in Inovant average per transaction price to Visa Canada and a depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar. Those decreases were partially offset by higher spending on technology development projects specific to the Canada region, related primarily to document management and information security.

In fiscal 2006, fees paid to Visa International were Cdn$16.7 million, as compared to Cdn$18.9 million in fiscal 2005. The decline of Cdn$2.2 million, or 11.7%, was primarily due to a fee waiver provided by Visa International to the incorporated regional group members in fiscal 2006 to help mitigate costs for funding member reimbursements relating to a technical problem with payment cards introduced in September 2005, which included a holographic magnetic strip on the back of the card. In addition, the decline in fees paid to Visa International was also due to a decline in spending on some global technology development projects, and a depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar, offset partly by increased investment in a global information security program.

249

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses were Cdn$30.3 million in fiscal 2006, as compared with Cdn$28.9 million in fiscal 2005, which represents an increase of Cdn$1.4 million or 4.7%. These expenses were higher due to:

• An increase in the average number of Visa Canada full-time equivalent employees from 92 in fiscal 2005 to 104 in fiscal 2006. This increase was necessary to support enhanced investment in new product and technology development, interchange management, and relationship management.

• A travel and entertainment expense increase of Cdn$0.8 million or 32% from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006, most notably related to spending for the 2006 Olympic Winter Games.

Such increases in other operating expenses in fiscal 2006 were partially offset by:

• The absence of a Cdn$1.5 million charitable donation made during the prior year for the Indonesian tsunami relief effort.

• A Cdn$1.2 million or 15% reduction in spending on professional services.

Provision for Current Income Taxes

In fiscal 2006, Visa Canada’s provision for current income taxes was Cdn$1.8 million, up Cdn$0.9 million or 116.6% from fiscal 2005. This increase was due to higher current tax expense in Visa Canada’s U.S. subsidiary related to its 5% share of Inovant’s taxable income.

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2005, compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2004

Total Revenue

Total revenues were Cdn$120.6 million in fiscal 2005, up Cdn$9.6 million or 8.6% from fiscal 2004, due primarily to increases in member revenues, distributions received from Inovant, and other revenue in the year.

The following table reflects the components of total revenues for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004:

					2005 vs. 2004
Years Ended September 30,	2005		2004		Cdn$ Change		% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Member Revenue
Service fees	Cdn$	74.3	Cdn$	69.9	Cdn$	4.4	6.3	%
Data processing revenues		27.2		25.5		1.7	6.9	%
Other member revenue		5.8		5.3		0.5	8.6	%
		107.3		100.7		6.6	6.6	%
Other revenue
Card recovery bulletin fees		7.9		7.7		0.3	3.3	%
Interest		0.5		0.5		0.1	13.3	%
Distributions from Inovant		3.1		1.4		1.7	125.7	%
Other		1.7		0.8		0.9	111.9	%
		13.3		10.3		3.0	28.6	%
Total revenues	Cdn$	120.6	Cdn$	111.0	Cdn$	9.6	8.6	%

Member Revenue

Fees collected from members represented 89% of Visa Canada’s revenues in fiscal 2005 compared to 91% in fiscal 2004. During fiscal 2005, revenues generated from members were Cdn$107.3 million, which reflects an increase of Cdn$6.6 million or 6.6% from fiscal 2004, and is primarily due to an increase in service fees and data processing fees.

250

Service fees—For fiscal 2005, service fee revenues increased to Cdn$74.3 million, representing a Cdn$4.4 million or 6.3% increase from the prior year, due primarily to higher total volume. Visa Canada’s revenue growth rate on a percentage basis lagged its total volume growth rate of 10.2% in fiscal 2005 due to price reductions that were implemented in January 2005 so that Visa Canada could achieve its not-for-profit objective. Visa Canada’s effective service fee rate—the ratio of service fees to total volume—was 3.5% lower in fiscal 2005 than in fiscal 2004.

Data processing revenues—Data processing revenues increased by Cdn$1.7 million or 6.9% to Cdn$27.2 million in fiscal 2005 as compared with fiscal 2004, while the number of messages processed by Visa Canada increased by 9.8% during the same period. Visa Canada’s revenue growth rate lagged the growth rate in the number of messages processed primarily because data processing fees are levied in U.S. dollars and the U.S. dollar depreciated by 7.7% against the Canadian dollar during the fiscal year. Offsetting the negative impact of foreign exchange rate movements, and increasing the year-over-year growth rate in fiscal 2005 data processing revenues, was a Cdn$1.6 million one-time fee waiver provided to members in fiscal 2004.

Other member revenue—Other member revenue increased by Cdn$0.5 million or 8.6% in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004, as higher new member fees and merchandising revenue were offset partly by lower revenue for various other services.

Other Revenue

Other revenue was Cdn$13.3 million in fiscal 2005, which represents an increase of Cdn$3.0 million or 28.6% from fiscal 2004. The increase from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005 resulted mainly from:

• An increase of Cdn$1.7 million in distributions received from Inovant. These distributions are included in the statement of income in accordance with Canadian GAAP.

• A one-time Cdn$1.0 million customer rebate from Inovant included in other revenue in fiscal 2005.

• An additional Cdn$0.3 million in card recovery bulletin fees, as a 25.6% increase in card recovery bulletin listings offset a decline in the U.S. dollar, the card recovery bulletin billing currency.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses were Cdn$117.0 million in fiscal 2005, up Cdn$9.7 million or 9.1% from fiscal 2004, which was due primarily to higher advertising and marketing expenses and other operating expenses, offset by lower direct expenses.

The following table reflects total operating expenses for fiscal 2005 and 2004:

					2005 vs. 2004
Years Ended September 30,	2005		2004		Cdn$ Change			% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Advertising and marketing	Cdn$	45.5	Cdn$	38.8	Cdn$	6.7		17.3	%
Direct expenses		42.5		47.4		(4.9	)	(10.4	)%
Other operating expenses		28.9		21.0		7.9		37.8	%
Total operating expenses	Cdn$	117.0	Cdn$	107.2	Cdn$	9.7		9.1	%

Advertising and Marketing

Advertising and marketing expenses increased Cdn$6.7 million, or 17.3% from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005, primarily due to:

• Higher advertising and promotional spending to support brand-differentiating programs, key sponsorships, and product development initiatives.

251

• Investment to grow Visa acceptance and cardholder usage in certain retail and wholesale areas.

• Higher spending on research, designed to improve Visa Canada’s understanding of its marketing effectiveness.

Direct Expenses

Direct expenses decreased by Cdn$4.9 million or 10.4% to Cdn$42.5 million from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005, primarily due to a decrease in fees paid to both Inovant and Visa International.

Fees to Inovant were Cdn$22.4 million in fiscal 2005, a decrease of Cdn$2.3 million or 9.1% from fiscal 2004. This decrease was the result primarily of a depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar.

In fiscal 2005, fees paid to Visa International were Cdn$18.9 million, as compared to Cdn$21.9 million in fiscal 2004. The reduction of Cdn$3.0 million was primarily due to a depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar and a reduction in spending on certain common global technology projects.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses were Cdn$28.9 million for fiscal 2005, as compared with Cdn$21.0 million for fiscal 2004. This represents a Cdn$7.9 million or 37.8% increase from the prior year resulting from:

• Growth in the average number of Visa Canada personnel from 81 in fiscal 2004 to 92 in fiscal 2005. These additional full-time employees were required to support strategic initiatives such as migration of the Canadian payments market to a chip technology platform, as well as an increased level of marketing spending.

• Initiatives undertaken to assess the organizational and governance structure of Visa Canada.

• A Cdn$1.5 million charitable donation related to the Indonesian tsunami relief effort.

Provision for Current Income Taxes

In fiscal 2005, Visa Canada’s provision for current income taxes was Cdn$0.8 million, down Cdn$1.0 million or 55.9% from fiscal 2004. This decrease was due to lower current tax expense in Visa Canada’s U.S. subsidiary, related to its 5% share of Inovant’s taxable income.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Visa Canada’s primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations, cash on hand, and fixed income investments. Visa Canada has not assumed any debt financing to date.

	March 31,				September 30,
	2007		2006		2006		2005		2004
	(unaudited)				(audited)
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Data:
Cash	Cdn$	17,589	Cdn$	1,950	Cdn$	7,336	Cdn$	6,881	Cdn$	6,695
Investment securities		6,721		7,030		6,619		6,880		6,573
Total current assets		31,042		14,511		20,119		20,615		18,037
Total current liabilities		11,427		8,046		14,127		11,969		11,036
Net assets		23,625		9,588		9,699		11,122		8,359
Working capital		19,615		6,466		5,992		8,646		7,001

252

As at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, Visa Canada had Cdn$2.0 million and Cdn$1.6 million, respectively, of accrued liabilities related to its defined benefit pension plan and its unfunded supplemental pension plan.

Visa Canada has no significant long-term debt outside of its pension obligations as at March 31, 2007, or September 30, 2006. Visa Canada does not have any investments in special-purpose entities, outstanding derivative contracts, or synthetic leases. Visa Canada has significant off-balance sheet commitments and contingencies that may have significant future cash requirements. For additional information about Visa Canada’s commitments and contingent liabilities, see the discussion in “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” and “Contractual Obligations” below and in Notes 8 and 9 in Visa Canada’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2006 and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Visa Canada settles payments among member institutions for domestic transactions on a gross basis and only after all amounts due have been remitted. Once all issuing members remit the full balances owing to Visa Canada, Visa Canada disburses funds owing to acquiring members that same day. Settlement on a given day relates to transactions that occurred on the previous business day. Visa Canada therefore generally has no liquidity requirements with respect to its domestic settlement process. Settlement for all international transactions involving Visa Canada’s members is conducted by Visa International, and therefore has no liquidity implications for Visa Canada.

An investment policy has been approved by Visa Canada’s board of directors and provides management with guidelines and authority to manage Visa Canada’s investments. The objectives of that policy are to maximize income earned on investments while maintaining the integrity of principal, and to assure sufficient liquidity for operational expenses and business expansion. Investments are generally held to maturity. The board of directors of Visa Canada has restricted Cdn$7.0 million of Visa Canada’s net assets for settlement failure-related obligations, but otherwise Visa Canada has the ability to liquidate investments to meet its cash requirements. See Note 8 of Visa Canada’s audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2006 and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus for further information.

As at both March 31, 2007, and September 30, 2006, Visa Canada’s investment securities portfolio was comprised of Government of Canada and Canadian Provincial Government fixed income securities with maturities ranging from less than one to ten years.

Visa Canada believes that the cash provided by its operating and investing activities is sufficient to fund its operations, working capital requirements, long-term pension and lease obligations, expected capital investment, and strategic restructuring matters for the next twelve months. Visa Canada will continue to assess its liquidity position and potential sources of supplemental liquidity in view of its operating performance and other relevant circumstances.

Cash Flows

	Six Months Ended March 31,						Years Ended September 30,
Sources/(uses) of cash	2007			2006			2006			2005			2004
	(unaudited)						(audited)
	(in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	Cdn$	11,476		Cdn$	(4,241	)	Cdn$	1,752		Cdn$	2,576		Cdn$	4,796
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(1,223	)		(690	)		(1,297	)		(2,390	)		542
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		—			—			—			—			—
Increase (decrease) in cash		10,253			(4,931	)		455			186			5,338

253

Operating Activities

The Cdn$15.7 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities in the six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared with the six months ended March 31, 2006 was primarily due to a Cdn$15.5 million increase in net income.

The Cdn$0.8 million decrease in net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2006 as compared with fiscal 2005 was attributable primarily to:

• Net income that was lower by Cdn$4.2 million for fiscal 2006, versus the prior year;

• A Cdn$0.3 million decrease in net non-cash expenses from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006, related primarily to amortization and future tax assets; which was partially offset by

• A Cdn$2.5 million decrease in net working capital for fiscal 2006 as compared with a Cdn$1.1 million an increase in fiscal 2005. This difference of Cdn$3.7 million partially offset the impact of lower net income and net non-cash items outlined above.

The Cdn$2.2 million decrease in net cash provided by operating activities from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005 was attributable primarily to:

• An increase in net income of Cdn$0.8 million; which was partially offset by

• A Cdn$1.1 million increase in net working capital during fiscal 2005 as compared with a decrease of Cdn$1.9 million in fiscal 2004. That difference created a year-over-year decline in the amount of cash provided by working capital of Cdn$3.0 million.

Investing Activities

The Cdn$0.5 million increase in net cash used in investing activities in the six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006, was primarily due to higher levels of investment in leasehold improvements and in a document management technology platform.

The Cdn$1.1 million decrease in net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2006 as compared with fiscal 2005 was due to lower net purchases of fixed income securities and reduced investment in capital assets.

The Cdn$2.9 million increase in cash used in investing activities from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005 was due to higher net purchases of fixed income securities and higher investment in capital assets.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities by Visa Canada was $nil for all periods discussed in this proxy statement-prospectus. Visa Canada’s operating and investing activities have historically provided the cash necessary to fund its business activities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Visa Canada’s off-balance sheet arrangements relate to settlement guarantees. As a member of Visa International, Visa Canada indemnifies members for any settlement loss suffered due to the failure of any other member to honor Visa cards and travelers cheques processed in accordance with Visa Canada’s Operating Regulations. Under Visa International’s bylaws, Visa Canada shares in the risk of potential losses attributable to the settlement failure of any of its Canadian members or members in other Visa regions. Visa Canada’s share of any loss would be determined by a specific formula included in Visa International’s bylaws and the amount of that loss is unlimited.

254

To manage the risk of settlement loss, a formalized set of credit standards has been approved by the Visa International board of directors. The exposure to settlement losses not covered by member collateral or insurance is accounted for as a settlement guarantee. The fair value of the settlement risk guarantee is estimated based on a proprietary Visa International model which is used to estimate member settlement exposure in conjunction with Visa’s global risk policies and procedures. This model incorporates certain assumptions relating to member settlement exposure and historical loss and recovery experience. The fair value of Visa Canada’s settlement risk guarantee was Cdn$nil at both March 31, 2007, and September 30, 2006.

Visa Canada has designated Cdn$7 million of its net assets as a Risk Stabilization Fund based on the Bank for International Settlements standards for capital adequacy, to provide funding in the case that a settlement failure were ever to occur. In case of a settlement loss, Visa Canada also has the right to call on its members to cover any shortfall in funding. For further information, see Note 8 of Visa Canada’s audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2006 and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Contractual Obligations

As of September 30, 2006, significant contractual obligations, including payments due by period, were as follows:

	Years Ending September 30,
Payments due by period	Total	2007	2008-2009	2010-2012	Thereafter
	(in Cdn$ millions)
Operating lease obligations	9.9	1.2	2.4	2.2	4.1
Marketing obligations	9.4	2.5	3.8	3.1	—
Total	19.3	3.7	6.2	5.3	4.1

For more information regarding Visa Canada’s contractual obligations, refer to notes 5 and 9 to Visa Canada’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2006 and for the six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively, included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Visa Canada also has obligations with respect to its pension plans. Visa Canada’s contributions to fund its defined benefit pension plan are expected to total Cdn$0.1 million in fiscal 2007. It also maintains a supplemental pension plan which is funded from operating cash flows as payments are required to be made to plan participants. The payments to plan participants are expected to total Cdn$0.1 million during fiscal 2007. For further information, see Note 4 to Visa Canada’s audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2006 and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus. Effective February 2007, Visa Canada has access to a letter of credit of Cdn$4.1 million in place to secure its supplemental pension plan obligation. Visa Canada has not drawn on this letter of credit in any period to date to fund its supplemental pension plan obligations.

Visa Canada has no material capital lease obligations.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Canadian Standards:

Financial Instruments

In January 2005, The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, or CICA issued CICA 3855, Financial Instruments—Recognition and Measurement, which prescribes when a financial asset, liability, or derivative is to be recognized on the balance sheet and at what amount—sometimes using fair value and other times using cost-based measures. CICA 3855 also specifies how financial instrument gains and losses are to be presented. CICA

255

3855 applies to interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2006. The adoption of this standard beginning on October 1, 2006 did not have a material impact on Visa Canada’s financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2007. For further information, refer to Note 2 of Visa Canada’s unaudited consolidated interim financial statements as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

Hedging

In January 2005, the CICA issued CICA 3865, Hedges. CICA 3865 provides accounting guidance for entities which choose to designate qualifying transactions as hedges for accounting purposes. It replaces and expands on Accounting Guideline No. 13, Hedging Relationships, and the hedging guidance in CICA 1650, Foreign Currency Translation, by specifying how hedge accounting is applied and what disclosures are necessary when it is applied. This new standard was effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years commencing on or after October 1, 2006. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the Visa Canada’s financial statements.

Comprehensive Income

In January 2005, the CICA issued CICA 1530, Comprehensive Income, which introduces new standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income. Comprehensive income is defined in the standard as the change in equity (net assets) of an enterprise during a reporting period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. It includes all changes in equity during a period, except those changes resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. CICA 1530 applies to interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2006. The adoption of this standard beginning on October 1, 2006 resulted in the creation of a new section on Visa Canada’s consolidated statement of financial position sheet entitled “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” For further information, refer to Note 2 of Visa Canada’s unaudited consolidated interim financial statements as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus.

U.S. GAAP:

Uncertain Tax Positions

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2006. Visa Canada is in the process of determining the effect, if any, of adopting FIN 48 on differences between Canadian GAAP and under U.S. GAAP.

Fair Value Measurements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157), which defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Visa Canada is in the process of determining the effect, if any, of adopting SFAS 157 on differences between Canadian GAAP and under U.S. GAAP.

Unfunded Pension Obligations

In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R))” (SFAS 158). SFAS No. 158 is effective for non-public companies for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007, except for the measurement date provisions, which are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Visa Canada

256

plans to adopt the balance sheet recognition provision of SFAS No. 158 at September 30, 2007 on a U.S. GAAP basis and that adoption is not expected to significantly increase its pension liability and reduce its equity, pre-tax. Any estimates are actuarially calculated, based on certain assumptions for the plans and assumes there will be no modifications, amendments or other significant changes to the plans. Actual results will likely differ from this estimate. Visa Canada is in the process of determining the effect, if any, of adopting SFAS 158 on differences between Canadian GAAP and under U.S. GAAP.

Fair Value Option

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment to SFAS 115” (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows the measurement of many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis under a fair value option. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 159 is not expected to have a material impact on Visa Canada’s Canadian to U.S. GAAP excess of revenue over income reconciliation.

Related Party Transactions

Three out of Visa Canada’s total twenty-four members each individually accounted for 10% or more of Visa Canada’s total revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2007, and for fiscal 2006. In aggregate, these members accounted for more than 70% of Visa Canada’s total revenues with the two largest members in aggregate accounting for more than 50% of Visa Canada’s total revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2007, and for fiscal 2006. The loss of any one of these members would adversely impact Visa Canada’s total revenues, net income, and cash flow in future periods.

Certain of Visa Canada’s member financial institutions also have officers that also serve on Visa Canada’s board of directors. These institutions include:

• Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce;

• Royal Bank of Canada;

• The Toronto-Dominion Bank;

• The Bank of Nova Scotia;

• La Fédération des Caisses Desjardins du Québec;

• U.S. Bank National Association; and

• Vancouver City Savings Credit Union.

Visa Canada generated total revenues from these members of approximately Cdn$61.7 million for the period ended March 31, 2007, and Cdn$112.7 million, Cdn$107.1 million, and Cdn$100.2 million for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Visa Canada also incurred operating expenses for services provided by these members of Cdn$1.3 million for the period ended March 31, 2007, and Cdn$2.4 million, Cdn$2.0 million, and Cdn$1.6 million for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. These expenses represent payments for banking and settlement services and for Visa Canada’s leased premises, and occurred at market rates.

Effective February 2007, Visa Canada also has a Cdn$4.1 million letter of credit facility in place with The Bank of Nova Scotia to secure its obligations under Visa Canada’s supplemental pension plan. Visa Canada has not currently drawn on this facility.

Refer to Note 6 to Visa Canada’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the six months ending March 31, 2007 and for fiscal 2006 included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus for information regarding transactions with other Visa entities.

257

Seasonality

Visa Canada’s revenues and the underlying drivers of revenue, specifically total volume and messages processed, are not materially affected by seasonality. In fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, no individual quarter represented more than 27% or less than 24% of annual revenues.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Visa Canada’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. In connection with the preparation of its financial statements, Visa Canada’s management is required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and the related disclosures. Visa Canada bases its assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time its consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that its financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with Canadian GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from its assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material to the financial statements.

Visa Canada’s significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of its audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2006 included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus. Visa Canada’s management believes that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating its reported financial results, and they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumption
Impairment of Investments
Visa Canada estimates the fair value of its cost method investments regularly or if there have been identified events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments. Visa Canada’s investments in fixed income securities and Inovant qualify for this treatment.	Identified events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments are evaluated based on management’s judgments. Among the factors considered by management are developments since the acquisition of the investment, the sales price of recently issued securities, the financial condition and operating results of the issuer, earnings trends and consistency of operating cash flows, the long-term business potential of the issuer and other factors generally pertinent to the valuation of investments.	Visa Canada had an impairment charge of Cdn$0.1 million for fiscal 2006. There were no impairment charges in the periods ended March 31, 2007 or 2006, or in fiscal 2005 or fiscal 2004. If actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and judgments we used in this methodology, Visa Canada may be exposed to impairment losses that could be material to Visa Canada’s financial statements. Visa Canada’s maximum exposure to changes in fair value estimates as at March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 is represented by the book values of these investments, which were Cdn$7.9 million, Cdn$7.8 million, and Cdn$8.1 million, respectively.

258

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumption
Capitalized Software
Capitalized software includes internal and external costs incurred in developing software for internal use. Capitalized software is evaluated for impairment, at a minimum, on an annual basis or when an event occurs or circumstances change which indicate the existence of a possible impairment. If the carrying value exceeds the technology’s fair value, an impairment loss is recorded.	Management conducts an impairment analysis by applying judgment in estimating whether each technology project will satisfy its intended function.	Visa Canada had no impairment charges in the period ended March 31, 2007, or in fiscal 2006, 2005 or 2004. At March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 Visa Canada’s maximum exposure to changes in fair value estimates is represented by the book values of these intangible assets, which were Cdn$1.5 million, Cdn$0.8 million and Cdn$0.4 million, respectively. If actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and judgments used in this methodology, Visa Canada’s losses will not be material to its financial statements.
Settlement Risk Guarantee
The fair value of the settlement guarantee is based on estimates.	Effective October 1, 2006, with the adoption of CICA 3855, Visa Canada is required to estimate the fair value of this guarantee and record it on the consolidated statement of financial position. Management estimates the value of this guarantee using internal estimates of the probability of failure by each member, average settlement exposures, average number of days to settle and historical losses.	The resulting estimate of this settlement guarantee, after consideration of collateral held, was Cdn$ nil at March 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005. If actual results are not consistent with management’s assumptions and judgments used in calculating the fair value, we may be exposed to a fair value change that could be material to Visa Canada’s financial statements.
Pension
Pension assumptions are significant inputs to actuarial models that measure pension benefit obligations and related effects on operations. Two critical assumptions—discount rate and expected return on assets—are important elements of plan expense and asset/liability measurements. We evaluate these critical assumptions annually on a plan basis. Other assumptions involving demographic factors such as retirement age, mortality and

259

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumption
turnover are evaluated periodically and are updated to reflect Visa Canada’s experience and expectations for the future. Actual results in any given year will often differ from actuarial assumptions because of economic and other factors, and, in accordance with Canadian GAAP, the impact of these differences are accumulated and amortized over future periods.
Visa Canada’s discount rate is based on matching the duration of other corporate bond pools that match the expected benefit payment stream. The discount rate enables us to state the expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases pension expense. Visa Canada relies on the advice and expertise of actuarial consultants when making these critical assumptions.	To reflect market interest rate conditions in calculating the projected benefit obligation, Visa Canada decreased its pension discount rate from 6.0% at September 30, 2005 to 5.0% at September 30, 2006 and 5.1% at March 31, 2007.	A 25 basis point decrease or increase in the discount rate would increase or decrease annual pension expense, respectively, by Cdn$23 thousand per fiscal year.
To determine the expected rate of return on plan assets Visa Canada considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as the long-term historical risks and returns associated with each asset class within the plan portfolio. A lower expected rate of return on plan assets increases pension cost.	Visa Canada utilized an expected rate of return of 7.0% at March 31, 2007 and at September 30, 2006 and 2005.	A 25 basis point decrease or increase in the expected return on assets would increase or decrease pension expense, respectively, by Cdn$6 thousand per fiscal year.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk is the potential for economic losses to be incurred as a result of changes in market rates and prices. Visa Canada is exposed to two market risks that could affect its business: changes in interest rates and changes in foreign exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk

Visa Canada holds long-term fixed income investments which are sensitive to interest rate changes. The fair value of these holdings may be adversely impacted by a rise in interest rates. Visa Canada’s practice of investing in government issued fixed income securities and holding these investments to maturity mitigates this risk, but situations may arise that require Visa Canada to liquidate these investments before their maturity date. Additionally, a falling rate environment creates reinvestment risk because as securities mature the proceeds are reinvested at a lower rate, generating less interest income. Notwithstanding the efforts to manage interest rate

260

risks, there can be no assurances that there will be adequate protection against the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would not have a material impact on Visa Canada’s financial statements for the six months ended March 31, 2007 or for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005.

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk

Visa Canada generates approximately one-third of its revenue and incurs approximately one-third of its expenses in U.S. dollars, while its financial reporting currency is the Canadian dollar. The impact of foreign exchange rate changes on Visa Canada’s reported net income is not material. In fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006, Visa Canada’s U.S. dollar revenues have approximated its U.S. dollar expenses, thereby creating a natural hedge against this risk. The following table reflects Visa Canada’s U.S. dollar revenues as a percentage of U.S. dollar expenses in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004.

	2006		2005		2004
U.S. dollar revenues as a percent of U.S. dollar expenses	94.3	%	102.7	%	80.7	%

Apart from the extent to which revenues and expenses generated in U.S. dollars offset each other in a given period, Visa Canada does not otherwise hedge its exposure to foreign exchange risk.

Visa Canada has no foreign exchange risk with respect to settlement of domestic or international transactions.

261

MANAGEMENT FOLLOWING THE RESTRUCTURING

Executive Officers and Directors

Directors

Board of Directors of Visa Inc. upon completion of the restructuring

Prior to the completion of the restructuring, our certificate of incorporation will be amended to provide that, from and after the closing of the restructuring and until the closing of an initial public offering of Visa Inc. common stock, our board of directors will consist of no more than 18 directors, of which seven directors will be drawn from our geographic regions, or regional directors, as follows:

• two directors will be elected by the holders of class USA common stock;

• one director will be elected by holders of our class Canada common stock;

• one director will be elected by holders of our class AP common stock;

• one director will be elected by holders of our class LAC common stock;

• one director will be elected by holders of our class CEMEA common stock; and

• one director will be elected by holders of our voting series of class EU common stock.

In addition, the Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc. will serve on the board of directors. Finally, a majority of the board of directors will consist of independent directors who will be determined to be “independent” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission, as applicable. We currently anticipate that prior to the mailing of this proxy statement-prospectus we will have appointed our entire board of directors.

Board of Directors of Visa Inc. after the closing of an initial public offering

From the closing of an initial public offering of Visa Inc. common stock until the third anniversary of such date, the number of directors constituting our board of directors will consist of not less than 17 directors, comprised of the following:

• two directors will be regional directors from Visa USA;

• one director will be a regional director from Visa Canada;

• one director will be a regional director from Visa AP;

• one director will be a regional director from Visa LAC;

• one director will be a regional director from Visa CEMEA;

• the Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc.; and

• a majority of independent directors.

From and after the third anniversary of the closing of the initial public offering, the number on our board of directors will be determined by an affirmative vote of the majority of the board of directors, but will be comprised at all times of at least a majority of independent directors.

Classification of Board of Directors of Visa Inc.

Our certificate of incorporation will be amended to provide that our board of directors will be divided into three classes of directors, other than those with respect to directors who may be elected exclusively by holders of any outstanding series of preferred stock. The three classes, which will be as nearly equal in number as possible, will be designated Class I, Class II and Class III and will serve staggered terms.

262

• Class I director. Each regional director will serve as a Class I director and the term of the Class I directors will expire on the first anniversary of the closing of the restructuring, except that the term of the regional director for Visa Europe will expire on the day immediately prior to the closing date of an initial public offering of Visa Inc. common stock.

• Class II director. Our Chief Executive Officer and one or more of the independent directors will serve as a Class II director and the term of the Class II directors will expire on the second anniversary of the closing of the restructuring, or, in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, the earlier of the: (i) the second anniversary of the closing of the restructuring; and (ii) the date on which he or she ceases to hold the title of our Chief Executive Officer.

• Class III director. One or more of the independent directors will serve as a Class III director and the term of the Class III directors will expire ending the third anniversary of the closing of the restructuring.

At each succeeding meeting of stockholders, directors will be elected for a full term of one year to succeed the directors of the class whose terms expire at such annual meeting.

Current Executive Officers and Directors

The following table sets forth information about individuals who are currently expected to serve as directors and/or executive officers of Visa Inc. immediately after the closing of the restructuring.

Name	Age	Position
Joseph W. Saunders	61	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
William M. Sheedy	40	Executive Vice President

Set forth below is certain biographical information of each these individuals.

Joseph W. Saunders joined Visa International as Executive Chairman of the Transition Governance Committee in February 2007. He was named Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc. in May 2007 and officially began serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc. upon its formation in May 2007. Prior to joining Visa International, he served as President of Card Services for Washington Mutual since the acquisition of Providian in October 2005. Mr. Saunders was President and Chief Executive Officer of Providian from November 2001, and Chairman of the board of directors from May 2002, until Washington Mutual’s acquisition of Providian in 2005. From 1997 until 2001, Mr. Saunders served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fleet Credit Card Services at FleetBoston Financial Corporation. Mr. Saunders served as a member of the board of directors of Visa U.S.A. from October 2002 to February 2007 and Visa International from October 2005 to February 2007, when he resigned from the boards of directors of Visa U.S.A. and Visa International to take the Executive Chairman position of the Visa Transition Governance Committee. From 1993 to 1997, while Mr. Saunders was at Household Finance, Inc., he served as a member of the board of directors for MasterCard International and MasterCard U.S.A., and was elected Chairman of MasterCard International’s board of directors in 1996. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration in 1967 and a Master of Business Administration degree in 1968, both from the University of Denver.

William M. Sheedy joined Visa U.S.A. in April 1993 and has served as the Executive Vice President of Interchange Strategy and Corporate Restructuring Initiatives at Visa U.S.A. since January 2001. In November 2006, he assumed responsibility for all financial related matters associated with Visa’s restructuring and in June 2007, was appointed to serve as Executive Vice President of Visa Inc. Prior to joining Visa U.S.A., he was employed at First Nationwide Bank (currently Citibank) as a Senior Financial Manager in Corporate Finance from 1990 to 1993. Mr. Sheedy received a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from West Virginia University in 1988 and a Master of Business Administration degree from University of Notre Dame in 1990.

263

Committees of the Board of Directors

We intend to form committees of our board of directors after the completion of the restructuring. Upon the completion of the restructuring, we intend to initially have an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating/corporate governance committee. Our board of directors will act in the place of all committees until each such committee is formed and the directors selected to serve on such committees meet the requirements for independence under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC, as applicable.

Audit Committee. We expect the audit committee will, among other things, provide assistance to our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to its oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our internal control over financial reporting and the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditors. The audit committee will also be responsible for the selection, retention, termination, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. The audit committee will be comprised of three or more directors, each of whom will be determined “independent” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC. All members of the audit committee will have a working familiarity with basic finance and accounting practices and we expect that at least one member will be an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined by the SEC rules. The audit committee will meet at least quarterly, or more frequently, as circumstances dictate.

Compensation Committee. We expect the compensation committee will provide assistance to our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to its oversight of our compensation programs and the compensation of our executives. The compensation committee will be responsible for, among other things, establishing and reviewing our overall compensation policy, reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our chief executive officer and our other executive officers, evaluating the performance of the chief executive officer and other executive officers in light of those goals and objectives and recommending his or her compensation. In addition, the compensation committee will be responsible for reviewing, monitoring and recommending changes to our incentive and equity-based compensation plans, as well as our employee benefits plans. The compensation committee will regularly report its activities to our board of directors. We expect the compensation committee will be comprised of three or more directors, each of whom will be determined to be “independent” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. Additionally, no director will serve unless he or she is a “non-employee director” as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and satisfies the requirements of an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The compensation committee will meet at least two times annually, or more frequently as circumstances dictate.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. We expect the nominating/corporate governance committee will provide assistance to our board of directors, among other things, identifying individuals qualified to become our directors and selecting, or recommending that our board of directors select, the candidates for all directorships to be filled by our board of directors or by our stockholders. The nominating/corporate governance committee will also develop and recommend to our board of directors a set of corporate governance principles applicable to us and will oversee the evaluation of our board of directors and our management. The nominating/corporate governance committee will be responsible for board selection, compositions and evaluation; committee selection and composition; corporate governance; continuity and succession planning process; and regular reports to our board of directors. The nominating/corporate governance committee will be comprised of three or more directors, each of whom is determined to be “independent” in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. The nominating/corporate governance committee will meet at least two times annually, or more frequently as circumstances dictate.

Director Independence

We expect that each of the audit, compensation and nominating/corporate governance committees will be comprised of three or more directors, each of whom will be determined to be “independent” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC rules, as applicable. As a result, the chief executive officer of Visa

264

Inc. will not be permitted to serve on any of these committees. Currently, we have not identified any individuals designated to serve on our board of directors immediately following the restructuring as independent directors. A search for independent directors is currently underway and we currently anticipate that prior to the mailing of this proxy statement-prospectus, we will have appointed 10 independent directors that will serve on our board of directors immediately following the restructuring.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the individuals currently serving on Visa Inc.’s board of directors participated in deliberations concerning executive officer compensation for Visa Inc. and we expect that none of the individuals that will serve on Visa Inc.’s compensation committee will be an executive officer or employee of Visa Inc. None of Visa Inc.’s executive officers serve as a current member of the board of directors or as a member of the compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on Visa Inc.’s board of directors or compensation committee.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions

As a newly formed company, we have not fully appointed the members of our board of directors and do not anticipate forming committees of our board of directors until after the completion of the restructuring. Accordingly, we have not established any policies or procedures for the review, approval or ratification of transactions with directors, executive officers and other affiliates. We expect to establish these policies and procedures after the completion of the restructuring, following the formation, and subject to the oversight, of the audit committee.

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

As a newly formed company, we currently have not paid any executive compensation and have not adopted any comprehensive executive compensation programs except for the equity incentive plan. Accordingly, the compensation amounts presented in the compensation tables below may not be indicative of our future compensation that we will pay or award to our executive officers or directors or fully represent our future compensation programs and policies.

Until the completion of the restructuring, we do not expect to have constituted our entire board of directors or formed a compensation committee. Although we have adopted the equity incentive plan which is described under “The Visa Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan” in this proxy statement-prospectus, establishment of the philosophy and objectives and adoption and implementation of our compensation programs will be undertaken after the completion of the restructuring and subject to the oversight of our compensation committee. The compensation committee will be expected to implement and administer our executive compensation programs and policies, as well as to establish, implement and continually monitor adherence with our compensation philosophy. We expect that the compensation committee will be comprised of three or more independent directors and we currently anticipate that prior to the mailing of this proxy statement-prospectus, we will have appointed those directors who will serve as the initial members of the compensation committee. We also anticipate that our board of directors will adopt a compensation committee charter effective upon completion of the restructuring.

Once the compensation committee is formed, we expect that it will establish the principal components of compensation for our named executive officers to be:

• base salary;

• performance-based non-equity incentive compensation;

265

• long term equity incentive compensation;

• retirement and other benefits; and

• perquisites and other personal benefits.

Although an annual incentive program for Visa Inc. has net yet been determined, we expect that, after the restructuring is completed and our compensation committee is formed, our compensation committee will approve an annual incentive compensation program for our executive officers and directors. In connection with his appointment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc., under the terms of his offer letter, Mr. Saunders will be eligible for an annual performance bonus based on such factors as the execution of definitive agreements in connection with the formation of Visa Inc. and successful achievement of his key responsibilities and primary tasks of his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, including governance of Visa Inc. and managing the restructuring activities of the organization. Mr. Saunders will also be eligible for a long-term performance bonus. For further information, see “—Employment Arrangements—Mr. Saunders” below.

While we do not currently have any equity-based compensation programs, we plan to implement the equity incentive plan in anticipation of awarding long term equity compensation to our employees in the future, subject to member approval of the plan. We believe that the adopting of an equity plan for Visa Inc., at the time of the completion of the restructuring, would facilitate implementation of our future compensation programs. The equity incentive plan was adopted with a view to providing our compensation committee, as administrator of the plan, with the flexibility to structure compensation programs that are consistent with our overall goals and strategic direction and that provide a wide range of incentives to attract, motivate and retain our employees. The equity incentive plan is an omnibus plan that provides for a variety of types of awards to maintain flexibility. The equity incentive plan permits the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance unit awards, performance share awards, cash-based awards and other stock-based awards to eligible persons. For further information regarding the terms of the equity incentive plan, see “The Visa Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan” in this proxy statement-prospectus.

No employee has been awarded any compensation under a long-term equity incentive program. It is anticipated that the compensation committee will award such compensation once such programs are implemented for Visa Inc. In administering the plan, the compensation committee will have the discretion to determine, for each award period, the portion of each named executive officer’s total compensation that will consist of awards under the equity incentive plan, the mix of short-term and long-term incentives represented by the awards, the allocation of the awards between equity and cash-based incentives, the forms of the equity awards, and the service-based requirements and performance goals the named executive officer will have to satisfy to receive payment under the awards. It is expected that a portion of each named executive officer’s total compensation will be delivered in the form of equity in order to align the executive officer’s interests with those of stockholders. The compensation committee’s philosophy will determine the manner in which it exercises its discretion to structure equity awards to achieve the plan’s purpose.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the ability of Visa Inc. to deduct for tax purposes compensation over $1,000,000 to any of the named executive officers, unless, in general, the compensation is paid pursuant to a plan which is performance related, non-discretionary and has been approved by Visa’s stockholders. No such limitation on deductibility was applicable to fiscal 2006. We expect the compensation committee, as part of its role, to review and consider the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m).

We intend to account for stock-based payments, including the equity incentive plan, in accordance with the requirements of FASB Statement 123(R).

266

Summary Compensation Table

As a newly formed company, Visa Inc. has not yet paid any compensation to any executive officer or director. The following table sets forth the compensation paid by Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Inovant or Visa Canada, as applicable, and earned for services rendered during fiscal 2006 by: (1) the two individuals who have been selected to serve as principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Visa Inc. immediately after the restructuring; and (2) because we have not yet determined who will serve as executive officers of Visa Inc. immediately after the restructuring; except for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the three most highly compensated executive officers among the executive officers of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Inovant and Visa Canada during fiscal 2006, or, collectively, the named executive officers. As of the date of this proxy statement-prospectus, Mr. Joseph Saunders has been selected to serve as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc. Mr. William Sheedy has been selected to serve as Executive Vice President of Visa Inc.

(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus (2) ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (3) ($)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (4) ($)	All Other Compensation (5) ($)	Total ($)
Joseph Saunders (1) Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Visa Inc.	2006	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
William Sheedy Executive Vice President, Visa Inc.	2006	350,013	250,000	—	—	1,254,106	45,096	66,840	1,966,055
John Coghlan President & CEO, Visa U.S.A.	2006	1,000,038	200,000	—	—	3,834,637	96,898	196,823	5,328,396
John Partridge President & CEO, Inovant	2006	625,025	1,076,320	—	—	2,576,690	533,214	117,101	4,928,350
Christopher Rodrigues Former President & CEO, Visa International (6)	2006	1,275,000	1,619,383	—	—	1,449,867	282,575	282,683	4,909,508

(1) Mr. Saunders did not join Visa International until February 2007 and therefore earned no compensation during fiscal 2006. See the Director Compensation Table below for amounts paid to Mr. Saunders during fiscal 2006 while serving as a non-employee director of Visa U.S.A. and Visa International.

(2) The amount in column (d) for Mr. Sheedy reflects the discretionary portion of his performance award under the Visa U.S.A. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan based on his individual performance as determined by the Visa U.S.A. board of directors. The amount for Mr. Coghlan reflects the discretionary portion of his award under the 2006 Visa U.S.A. Incentive Plan. The amount for Mr. Partridge includes $737,000, which is the discretionary portion of his performance award under the Inovant 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan based on his individual performance as determined by the Inovant board. In addition, in 2006, Mr. Partridge’s salary was adjusted retroactively to October 1, 2004. The amount reflected for Mr. Partridge includes the portion of the retroactive salary increase of $156,250 and annual incentive plan award adjustment of $183,070, applicable to 2005. The amount for Mr. Rodrigues reflects the final installment of his sign-on bonus. For further information regarding performance awards, see “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below.

(3) The amounts in column (g) reflect performance-based cash awards earned under the 2006 Visa U.S.A., Inovant and Visa International Incentive Plans. Under the Visa U.S.A. plan, Mr. Sheedy received $350,013 and Mr. Coghlan received $1,600,000; under the Inovant plan, Mr. Partridge received $937,500; and under the Visa International plan, Mr. Rodrigues received $1,275,000. This column also reflects the year-one performance award under the Visa U.S.A. and Inovant 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan. Under the Visa U.S.A. Long Term Incentive Plan, Mr. Sheedy’s performance award was valued at $860,000 and Mr. Coghlan’s performance award was valued at $2,150,000 based on Visa U.S.A.’s corporate performance results. Under the Inovant 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, Mr. Partridge’s year-one performance award was valued at $1,408,000. The long term incentive plan awards for Mr. Sheedy, Mr. Coghlan and

267

Mr. Partridge will vest on September 30, 2008. The Visa International Long Term Incentive Plan was changed in 2005 resulting in the performance adjustment period moving from the end of the first year to the end of the third year. As a result, Mr. Rodrigues did not have any long term incentive plan awards with a performance period ending in 2006. The amounts in column (g) also reflect the change in market value of the unvested long-term incentive plan awards that are deemed invested in an investment account until the end of each three-year plan cycle (Mr. Sheedy—$44,093, Mr. Coghlan—$84,637, Mr. Partridge—$231,190, and Mr. Rodrigues—$174,867).

(4) The amounts in column (h) reflect the actuarial increase in the present value benefits under all pension plans. These amounts were determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in Note 13 of Visa U.S.A.’s fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements and Note 14 of Visa International’s fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements, as applicable, which are included elsewhere in this proxy statement-prospectus and include amounts which Mr. Coghlan and Mr. Rodrigues may not currently be entitled to receive because such amounts are not vested. There are no above market earnings on non-qualified deferred compensation.

(5) The following table sets forth certain information with respect to “All Other Compensation” reported in column (i).

(a)	(b)		(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)	(k)
Name	Auto Allowance		Financial Planning	Financial Planning Tax Gross Up	Thrift Plan Match	Excess Thrift Plan Contribution	Companion Travel	Companion Travel Tax Gross Up	Executive LTD	Life Insurance Premiums	Total
Joseph Saunders	—		—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
William Sheedy	22,800		—	—	19,800	11,589	8,470	4,181	—	—	66,840
John Coghlan	22,800		78,827	15,266	14,646	45,357	11,942	7,985	—	—	196,823
John Partridge	33,600		13,167	—	13,200	31,489	15,053	7,792	2,800	—	117,101
Christopher Rodrigues	77,438	(a)	36,703	27,448	13,200	60,113	25,853	21,279	—	20,649	282,683

(a) Mr. Rodrigues received a leased vehicle.

(6) Mr. Rodrigues left the company in November 2006.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

(a)	(b)		(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)	(k)	(l)
Name	Grant Date		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards			Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards			All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares or Stock/ Units	All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options	Exercise or Base Price Of Option Awards (S/Share)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock & Option Awards
			Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)
Joseph Saunders(1)	—		—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
William Sheedy	10/1/2005	(2)	87,500	175,000	350,000	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	10/1/2005	(3)	100,000	500,000	1,100,000
John Coghlan	10/1/2005	(2)	500,000	1,000,000	2,000,000	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	10/1/2005	(3)	250,000	1,250,000	2,750,000
John Partridge	10/1/2005	(4)	234,375	468,750	937,500	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	10/1/2005	(5)	160,000	800,000	1,760,000
Christopher Rodrigues	10/1/2005	(6)	637,500	1,275,000	2,550,000	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	10/1/2005	(7)	1,800,000	2,400,000	3,000,000

(1) Mr. Saunders did not join Visa International until February 2007 and therefore has no 2006 compensation.

(2) The amount shown in column (c) reflects the minimum payment level under the 2006 “Visa U.S.A. Incentive Plan” which is 50% of the target amount in column (d). The amount shown in column (e) is 200% of such target amount. The actual payout amount under the plan for 2006 is included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

(3) The amount shown in column (c) reflects the minimum payment level under the “Visa U.S.A. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan” which is 20% of the target amount in column (d). The amount shown in column (e) is 220% of such target amount. The actual Performance Award earned under the plan for 2006 is included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

(4) The amount shown in column (c) reflects the minimum payment level under the 2006 “Inovant Incentive Plan” which is 50% of the target amount in column (d). The amount shown in column (e) is 200% of such target amount. The actual payout amount under the plan for 2006 is included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

(5) The amount shown in column (c) reflects the minimum payment level under the “Inovant 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan” which is 20% of the target amount in column (d). The amount shown in column (e) is 220% of such target amount. The actual Performance Award earned under the plan for 2006 is included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

268

(6) The amount shown in column (c) reflects the minimum payment level under the 2006 “Visa International Incentive Plan” which is 50% of the target amount in column (d). The amount shown in column (e) is 200% of such target amount. The actual payout amount under the plan for 2006 is included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

(7) The amount shown in column (c) reflects the minimum payment level under the “Visa International 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan” which is 75% of the target amount in column (d). The amount shown in column (e) is 125% of such target amount.

2006 Visa U.S.A. Long Term Incentive Plan and Inovant Long Term Incentive Plan. These plans are cash-based plans where awards vest at the end of a three-year plan cycle. At the beginning of the plan cycle, each participant is granted a target award which, at the end of the first year, is adjusted up or down, from 0% to 220%, based on the corporate performance of Visa U.S.A. or Inovant, as applicable, or the performance award. A participant’s performance award may be modified at the discretion of the CEO of Visa U.S.A. or Inovant, as applicable, (other than for the CEO) or the board of directors of Visa U.S.A. or Inovant, as applicable. The non-vested award is then automatically deferred for the remaining two years and credited to an individual account that is further credited with gains or losses from certain Fidelity fund investments that the participant may select. At the end of the plan cycle, if the executive has remained employed by Visa U.S.A. or Inovant, the award becomes vested and is payable to the participant.

2006 Visa International Long Term Incentive Plan. The Visa International Long Term Incentive Plan is a cash-based plan where awards vest at the end of a three-year plan cycle. At the beginning of the plan cycle, each participant is granted a target award which is determined based on a percentage of base salary, and may be subject to additional adjustment based on the participant’s results under the annual incentive plan and discretionary criteria. The unvested award is automatically deferred until the end of the plan cycle and credited to an individual account that is further credited with gains or losses from certain Fidelity fund investments that the participant may select, except that 25% will be deemed invested in a market money fund selected by Visa International. At the end of the third year of the plan cycle, an assessment is made, by the human resources and compensation committee of the Visa International board of directors, of the global performance of the Visa enterprise over the three-year plan cycle which may result in an adjustment ranging in amount from –25% to +25% to the final value of the deferred award. At the end of the plan cycle, if the executive has remained employed by Visa International, the award becomes vested and is payable to the participant.

Pension Benefits

The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to the named executive officers, including the number of years of service credited to each executive, under the Visa Retirement Plan and the Visa Excess Retirement Plan determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the consolidated financial statements of the applicable Visa entity.

(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)		(e)
Name	Plan Name	Number of Years Credited Service (#)	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) (2)		Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
Joseph Saunders (1)	—	—	—		—
William Sheedy	Visa Retirement Plan	13.2	233,389		—
	Visa Excess Retirement Plan	13.2	206,762		—
John Coghlan	Visa Retirement Plan	1.0	15,286	(2)	—
	Visa Excess Retirement Plan	1.0	81,612	(2)	—
John Partridge	Visa Retirement Plan	6.8	1,032,099		—
	Visa Excess Retirement Plan	6.8	788,538		—
Christopher Rodrigues	Visa Retirement Plan	2.2	39,294	(2)	—
	Visa Excess Retirement Plan	2.2	442,939	(2)	—

(1) Mr. Saunders did not join Visa International until February 2007.

(2) Includes amounts which Mr. Coghlan and Mr. Rodrigues may not currently be entitled to receive because such amounts are not vested.

269

Visa Retirement Plan. Under the Visa Retirement Plan, employees working for Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Inovant in the United States who have completed five years of service with Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Inovant generally earn the right to receive certain benefits upon retirement at the normal retirement age of 65, upon early retirement on or after age 55 with 10 years of service (or age 50 with 10 years of service if hired prior to October 1, 2002), or upon an earlier termination of employment. Retirement benefits are calculated as the product of 1.25% times the years of service multiplied by the monthly final average earnings for the last 60 consecutive months before retirement (or the product of 46.25% times the years of service divided by 25 years multiplied by the monthly final average earnings for the 36 highest consecutive months in the last 60 months before retirement if hired prior to October 1, 2002). Eligible earnings include salary, overtime, shift differentials, special and merit awards and short-term incentive awards. The formula below provides an illustration as to how the retirement benefits are calculated.

For employees hired prior to October 1, 2002

[ 46.25% of monthly final average earnings X Completed years of benefit services, including partial year
based on completed months 25 years ]

For employees hired after September 30, 2002

[ 1.25% X Completed years of benefit services, including partial year based on completed months (up to 35 full years) X Monthly final average earnings ]

If the employee retires early between the age of 55 and 64 (or age 50 and 61 if hired prior to October 1, 2002) and has completed at least ten years of service, the amount of benefits is reduced for each complete year an employee begins receiving early retirement benefits before age 65 (or age 62 if hired prior to October 1, 2002). If the employee retires prior to becoming eligible for early or normal retirement, the amount of benefits is actuarially reduced and is generally not as large as if the employee had continued employment until his or her early or normal retirement date.

Visa Excess Retirement Plan. To the extent that an employee’s annual retirement income benefit under the plan exceeds the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, such excess benefits may be paid from Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Inovant’s nonqualified, unfunded, noncontributory Visa Excess Retirement Plan. Benefits are not earned under the Visa Excess Retirement Plan until the individual has completed five years of service with us. The formula used to calculate the benefit payable pursuant to the Visa Excess Retirement Plan is generally the same as that which is used under the Visa Retirement Plan described above.

270

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Pursuant to the Visa Deferred Compensation Plan, of which Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Inovant, or any successor thereto are participating companies of the Visa Deferred Compensation Plan, certain executives may defer all or a portion of his or her annual or long-term non-equity incentive compensation. In addition, Visa has an Excess Thrift Plan, a nonqualified noncontributory retirement savings plan, for employees that exceed the IRS limits under the Thrift Plan in which the company continues to provide the matching contribution.

(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)
Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($) (2)	Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) (3)	Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)	Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)	Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)
Joseph Saunders (1)	—	—	—	—	—
William Sheedy	—	11,589	1,161	—	49,176
John Coghlan	353,634	45,357	15,064	—	414,055
John Partridge	1,712,414	31,489	314,693	3,701,480	3,871,814
Christopher Rodrigues	—	60,113	5,117	—	149,988

(1) Mr. Saunders did not join Visa International until February 2007.

(2) The amounts in column (b) reflect Mr. Coghlan’s deferred 2005 annual incentive plan award that was payable in November 2005 and Mr. Partridge’s deferred 2004 Long Term Incentive Award which vested September 30, 2006. These amounts are not reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.

(3) The amounts in column (c) reflect the contribution to the Excess Thrift Plan for each named executive officer by Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Inovant, as applicable. These amounts are also reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

The table below shows the funds available under the Visa Deferred Compensation Plan and the Excess Thrift Plan and their annual rate of return for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as reported by the administrator of the plan.

Name of Fund	Rate of Return
Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund—Institutional Class (2)	12.41	%
Dodge & Cox Income (1)	4.09	%
Dreyfus Founders Discovery Fund—Class F (2)	-3.46	%
Fidelity Balanced Fund	9.30	%
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund	9.24	%
Fidelity Retirement Money Market Portfolio	4.47	%
Janus Overseas Fund	36.62	%
PIMCO Total Return Fund—Admin Class (2)	3.28	%
Spartan © U.S. Equity Index Fund—Investor Class	10.74	%
T. Rowe Price Equity Income (1)	12.72	%
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (2)	15.53	%
TCW Select Equities Instl (1)	-4.04	%
Templeton Foreign Fund—Class A	11.50	%
Columbia Acorn Z (1)	9.59	%

(1) This fund is not available under the Visa Deferred Compensation Plan.

(2) This fund is not available under the Excess Thrift Plan.

Visa Deferred Compensation Plan. Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Inovant offer a deferred compensation plan to eligible U.S. employees. The Visa Deferred Compensation Plan allows for the deferral of an executive’s annual incentive bonus and cash long-term incentive award. Under the terms of the Visa Deferred Compensation Plan, participants are able to defer up to 100% of their incentives, if they submit a qualified deferral election. Benefits under the Visa Deferred Compensation Plan will be paid based on one of three

271

distribution dates or events previously elected by the participant: (a) immediately upon or up to five years following retirement; (b) immediately upon or the January following termination; or (c) optionally, in January in a specific year while actively employed. However, upon a showing of financial hardship and receipt of approval from the plan administrators, an executive may be allowed to access funds in his deferred compensation account earlier than his existing distribution election(s). Benefits can be received either as a lump sum payment or in annual installments, except in the case of pre-retirement termination where the participant must receive the benefit in a lump sum.

Visa Thrift Plan. The Visa Thrift Plan is a tax-qualified 401(k) retirement savings plan pursuant to which all U.S. employees of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Inovant are able to contribute the lesser of up to 50%, or 13% for highly compensated employees of their covered pay (base salary plus one-half of any sales commissions) up to the limit prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service to the Thrift Plan on a pre-tax basis. Employees also have the option of contribution on an after-tax basis from 1% up to 50%, or 13% for highly compensated employees, of salary or a combination of pre-tax and after tax contributions that do not exceed 50% (or 13% for “highly compensated employees”) of salary and IRS limits. The maximum pre-tax amount an employee may contribute to the Visa Thrift Plan annually is restricted by the IRS. If an employee reaches this limit during the calendar year, an employee may continue to make contributions to the Visa Thrift Plan on an after-tax basis.

Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Inovant, as applicable, will match 200% of the first 3% of pay that is contributed to the Visa Thrift Plan or 300% of the first 3% of pay if the employee has at least ten years of service with Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Inovant. All employee contributions to the Visa Thrift Plan are fully vested upon contribution and the matching contributions vest incrementally over three years, 20% after one year, 40% after two years, and 100% after three years.

Since the IRS limits the maximum amount a company and an employee can contribute to an employee’s Thrift Plan account each year, we continue to provide the matching contribution, after the applicable IRS limits are reached, to the Visa Excess Thrift Plan, which is a nonqualified noncontributory retirement savings plan. Employees are eligible to participate in the Visa Excess Thrift Plan if their covered pay is greater than the IRS pay cap or if the total of their contributions and Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Inovant’s matching contributions to the Visa Thrift Plan exceed the IRS benefit limit. The features of the Visa Excess Thrift Plan are generally the same as under the Visa Thrift Plan, except benefits cannot be rolled over to an IRA or another employer’s qualified plan.

Employment Arrangements

Mr. Saunders

Joseph Saunders executed an offer letter dated June 4, 2007 from Visa International under which Mr. Saunders agreed to serve as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc. Mr. Saunders has agreed to serve as Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc. for a term beginning on May 15, 2007, and continuing through May 15, 2009. Mr. Saunders has also agreed to serve as Chairman of the Transition Governance Committee or, upon formation, Visa Inc.’s board of directors, through at least 90 days following a Visa Inc. initial public offering. Visa Inc.’s board of directors may elect to extend Mr. Saunders’ employment term for one or more additional periods upon notice prior to the end of the term of his employment as Chief Executive Officer or Chairman, as applicable. Visa International or Visa Inc. may terminate Mr. Saunders’ employment.

Mr. Saunders will receive an annual base salary of $950,000. Mr. Saunders will also be eligible for an annual performance bonus, with a target annual bonus of 200%—300% of the annual base salary earned by Mr. Saunders. His actual annual bonus will be decided by the Transition Governance Committee or the board of directors of Visa Inc., in its discretion, and may be above, within or below this range. Mr. Saunders’ annual bonus for fiscal 2007 will be not less than 250% of his annual base salary earned during fiscal 2007, and will be

272

payable after the end of the fiscal year when bonuses are paid to other Visa International employees. Mr. Saunders will also be eligible for a long-term performance bonus, with a target long-term bonus of 500%-600% of the annual base salary earned by Mr. Saunders, and his actual long-term bonus, within this range, will be decided by the Transition Governance Committee or the board of directors of Visa Inc., in its discretion. Mr. Saunders’ 2007 long-term performance bonus will be payable in shares of Visa Inc. common stock, if approved by the Visa Inc. board of directors, upon the Transition Governance Committee’s recommendation. If the Transition Governance Committee or Visa Inc.’s board of directors deems payment of the long-term performance bonus in stock impractical, such bonus will be paid in cash. Mr. Saunders must be in active working status when the annual or long-term performance bonus would otherwise be paid to receive such a bonus, except as described below.

Mr. Saunders is eligible to participate in all employee benefit plans of Visa International. Mr. Saunders has agreed to standard confidentiality restrictions.

Mr. Coghlan

Under an employment agreement between Visa U.S.A. and John Coghlan dated as of June 23, 2005, Mr. Coghlan agreed to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Visa U.S.A. The employment period is initially from July 11, 2005 through September 30, 2008. Effective March 31, 2007 and ending March 31, 2015, the employment term will automatically be extended by one day on each day that passes, so that the employment term will always be 18 months, until either Visa U.S.A. or Mr. Coghlan gives notice that the agreement will cease to be so extended. The employment period will terminate on September 30, 2016.

Mr. Coghlan receives an annual base salary of not less than $1,000,000. Mr. Coghlan is also eligible for an annual performance bonus, with a target of 100% of his annual base salary, and with the issuance, timing and amount of the bonus to be decided by the board of directors of Visa U.S.A., in its discretion. Mr. Coghlan is also eligible to participate in the Visa U.S.A. Long Term Incentive Plan in each year for which awards are granted to senior executives, with a target award for such years of not less than $1,250,000. Under an amendment to the employment agreement dated March 3, 2007, Mr. Coghlan is eligible to receive a special Visa incentive plan award for the fiscal year ending on September 30, 2007, with a minimum award of $500,000, subject to upward adjustment in the sole discretion of the board of directors of Visa U.S.A.

Mr. Coghlan participates in all applicable savings and retirement plans of Visa U.S.A. He is entitled to: a monthly automobile allowance of not less than $1,900; an annual tax preparation allowance of not less than $2,100; an annual financial planning allowance of not less than $58,600; and an annual personal expense allowance of $75,000 for non-commercial private aircraft transportation for himself and his immediate family.

Mr. Coghlan has agreed to standard confidentiality restrictions. In addition, Mr. Coghlan has agreed to a period of non-solicitation of one year after his employment period ends.

Mr. Partridge

Under an employment agreement between Inovant and John Partridge dated as of October 1, 2004, Mr. Partridge agreed to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Inovant. The period of the agreement is from October 1, 2004 through the expiration date of December 31, 2009. To extend the agreement, Inovant must make a qualifying offer, which is a written offer of employment extended on or before December 2, 2009, for a period of not less than two years effective from January 1, 2010, which includes the same types of compensation as the current employment agreement.

Mr. Partridge receives an annual base salary of $625,000. Mr. Partridge is also eligible for an annual performance bonus with a target of 75% of his annual base salary, and with the issuance, timing and amount of

273

such bonus to be decided by the board of Inovant, in its discretion. Mr. Partridge is also eligible to participate in the Inovant Long Term Incentive Plan in each year for which awards are granted to senior executives, with a target award for such years of not less than $800,000.

Mr. Partridge participates in all applicable savings and retirement plans of Inovant. He is entitled to a monthly automobile allowance of not less than $1,900, or the maximum allowance provided under the Visa Automobile Policy in effect as of October 1, 2004, and an annual financial and estate planning allowance of not less than $15,000.

Mr. Partridge has agreed to standard confidentiality restrictions. In addition, Mr. Partridge has agreed to a period of non-solicitation of 18 months after his employment period ends.

Mr. Rodrigues

Under an employment agreement between Visa International and Christopher Rodrigues dated as of April 13, 2004, Mr. Rodrigues agreed to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Visa International. The employment period was initially to be from May 1, 2004 through September 30, 2009. Mr. Rodrigues’s employment was terminated effective November 16, 2006.

Mr. Rodrigues initially received an annual base salary of $1,275,000. Mr. Rodrigues was also eligible for an annual performance bonus, with a target of 100% of his annual base salary, and with the issuance, timing and amount of the bonus to be decided by the board of directors of Visa International, in its discretion. Mr. Rodrigues was also eligible to participate in the Visa Long Term Incentive Plan, in each year for which awards were granted to senior executives, with a target award for such years of not less than $1,800,000.

Mr. Rodrigues participated in all applicable savings and retirement plans of Visa International. He was entitled to a leased automobile and was provided a driver (utilized only for reasonable business purposes to drive the leased automobile or any other automobile owned or leased by Mr. Rodrigues); and received annual tax consulting and financial planning services with a vendor approved by Visa. Mr. Rodrigues was entitled to a sign-on bonus in the amount of $2,507,946 to be paid over three payments. Mr. Rodrigues was also eligible for inbound and outbound relocation expenses.

Mr. Rodrigues agreed to standard confidentiality restrictions. In addition, Mr. Rodrigues has agreed to a period of non-solicitation of two years after his termination date.

Potential Payments on Termination or Change-in-Control

Mr. Saunders

Following termination of Mr. Saunders’ employment without cause (as defined in the offer letter), Mr. Saunders and his spouse will be eligible for health benefits through the earlier of his eligibility for health benefits from another employer or his attainment of age 65. Mr. Saunders will be required to pay that portion of the cost of these benefits that is paid by active employees. Additionally, in the event Mr. Saunders’ employment is involuntarily terminated without cause or due to disability prior to May 15, 2009, Mr. Saunders or his beneficiaries will receive as severance: (a) a lump sum payment equal to two years’ base salary plus two times his target annual performance bonus (at 250% of his base salary) for the year of termination; and (b) the full value of any long-term performance bonus he would otherwise have received during the two-year period following his termination, payable when long-term bonuses are payable to active employees. Payment of Mr. Saunders’ severance may be delayed for six months following his termination if necessary to avoid a violation of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. To receive these severance benefits, Mr. Saunders is required to execute an acceptable release of all claims against Visa. In the event that payments made to Mr. Saunders

274

upon his termination of employment are subject to the excise tax imposed on excess parachute payments under the Internal Revenue Code, he will receive an additional amount to place him in the same after-tax position as if this excise tax did not apply to those payments.

Mr. Sheedy, Mr. Coghlan, Mr. Partridge

Payments Made Upon Termination

Regardless of the manner in which Mr. Sheedy, Mr. Coghlan and Mr. Partridge’s employment terminates, each executive may be entitled to receive amounts earned during his term of employment. Such amounts include:

• awards earned under the annual incentive plan during the fiscal year;

• grants pursuant to the Long Term Incentive Plan for the most-recently completed cycle;

• amounts contributed under the Visa Thrift Plan and the Visa Deferred Compensation Plan;

• amounts vested under the Visa Excess Thrift Plan;

• unused paid time off; and

• amounts accrued and vested through our Visa Retirement Plan and Visa Excess Retirement Plan.

Payments Made Upon Retirement

In the event of the retirement of Mr. Sheedy, Mr. Coghlan or Mr. Partridge, assuming each executive was vested and eligible for early or normal retirement, in addition to the items identified above:

• each executive would be entitled to receive a prorated share of each outstanding Long Term Incentive Plan cycle upon the completion of such cycle; and

• each executive would continue to receive health and welfare benefits until he reaches age 65 and would receive health and welfare benefits for his dependants, as applicable.

Payments Made Upon Involuntary Not For Cause Termination

In the event of the involuntary termination of Mr. Sheedy, Mr. Coghlan or Mr. Partridge not for “cause,” or, in the case of Mr. Coghlan and Mr. Partridge, in the event of termination by the executive for “good reason” (as each such term is defined in their employment agreements), in addition to the items identified under “Payments Made Upon Termination,” after execution of an acceptable release of all claims against Visa:

• each executive would receive a lump sum severance payment equivalent to eighteen months of base salary and target annual bonus; however, in the case of Mr. Coghlan and Mr. Partridge, such severance payments are paid out ratably over the 18-month severance period (except that, if Mr. Partridge accepts employment with another employer during the 18-month period, he will receive the remaining balance of unpaid severance payments in a lump sum) and as of September 30, 2006, Mr. Sheedy would have received four weeks of severance for each year of service;

• each executive would continue to receive health and welfare benefits through the earlier of the time when the executive becomes covered by another employer’s health and welfare plans, or the completion of the severance period;

• Mr. Sheedy would continue to receive life insurance coverage for one year;

• each executive would be entitled to receive a lump sum amount representing a pro rata portion of each outstanding Long Term Incentive Plan cycle through the severance period, or, in the case of Mr. Coghlan and Mr. Partridge, a lump sum amount representing full payment of all outstanding grants awarded to the executive under the Long Term Incentive Plan for which the executive has completed at

275

least one year of the multi-year performance cycle, and a lump sum amount representing a pro-rata portion of any other outstanding grant under the Long Term Incentive Plan; and, as of September 30, 2006, under the terms of the Visa U.S.A. Long Term Incentive Plan, Mr. Sheedy would not have been eligible for a pro rata portion of any unvested long term incentive plan award;

• each executive, except Mr. Partridge, would be entitled to receive outplacement services;

• Mr. Sheedy will be credited with additional years of service, equal to the severance period, for purposes of retirement vesting;

• Mr. Coghlan will receive the cost of provision of early retirement medical benefits under the pre-65 retiree medical benefit plan to him and his eligible family members, as if he, or his beneficiaries, were eligible for such benefits, if he was employed for five full years prior to this benefit becoming applicable; or, if Mr. Coghlan is eligible for benefits under such plan, the benefits will be provided directly by such plan; and

• if Mr. Coghlan’s employment is terminated by Visa U.S.A. without cause or if Mr. Coghlan becomes disabled or dies prior to September 30, 2007, he, or his beneficiaries, will be entitled to receive a full regular Annual Visa Incentive Plan award and Visa U.S.A. Long Term Incentive Plan award at the target for fiscal 2007, which awards will be 100% vested.

Payments Made Upon Death or Disability

In the event of the death or disability of Mr. Sheedy, Mr. Coghlan and Mr. Partridge, in addition to the benefits listed under “—Payments Made Upon Termination” and “—Payments Made Upon Retirement” above, or, in the case of Mr. Coghlan and Mr. Partridge, also in addition to the benefits listed under “—Payments Made Upon Involuntary Not For Cause Termination” above (other than outplacement services for Mr. Coghlan), each executive (or his estate) will receive benefits under our disability plan or payments under our life insurance plan, as appropriate.

Payments Made Upon a Change of Control

In the event that payments made to Mr. Coghlan or Mr. Partridge upon their termination of employment are considered parachute payments, they will receive an additional amount such that the net amount they retain, before income taxes are imposed, but after excise taxes are imposed on that additional amount, is equal to the excise tax on such parachute payments.

If there is a change in control (as defined in Mr. Coghlan’s and Mr. Partridge’s employment agreements) of Visa U.S.A. in the case of Mr. Coghlan, or of Inovant in the case of Mr. Partridge, or an effective registration of shares of common stock of Visa U.S.A. in the case of Mr. Coghlan, or of Inovant in the case of Mr. Partridge, in connection with an initial public offering of such common stock, in either case where immediately subsequent to such event the executive is not retained as Chief Executive Officer or is terminated within six months thereafter without cause, or if the executive terminates his employment for good reason, the executive will be fully vested and entitled to immediate payment of all outstanding long term incentive plan awards, and his award for the fiscal year in which the event occurs will be deemed earned pro-rata.

Mr. Sheedy does not have an employment agreement or any other agreement, plan or arrangement with Visa U.S.A. that provides for payments upon a change of control of Visa U.S.A.

276

Quantification of Termination Payments and Benefits.

The tables below reflect the amount of compensation that would be paid to each of the named executive officers in the event of termination of such executive’s employment under various scenarios. The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of September 30, 2006, and includes estimates of the amounts which would be paid out to the executives upon their termination. The tables do not include any amounts or benefits earned, vested, accrued or owing under any Visa International, Visa U.S.A., or Inovant plan or program including the Visa Thrift Plan, Visa Retirement Plan or Visa Deferred Compensation Plan; or under any annual or long term incentive plan; except to the extent that the named executive officer is entitled to an additional benefit as a result of the termination. For further information see “—Grants of Plan—Based Awards,” “—Pension Benefits” and “—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” above. Payments that would be made over a period of time have been estimated as the lump sum present value using 120% of the Applicable Federal Rate (with the exception of the Retirement Plan benefit). The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation from Visa.

Mr. Saunders

Mr. Saunders did not join Visa International until February 2007.

Mr. Sheedy

Termination Payments & Benefits

Incremental Benefits Due to Termination Event	Involuntary Not For Cause Termination		Disability		Death
Long Term Incentive Plan (unvested)	—	(3)	626,858		626,858
Thrift Plan (unvested)	—		—		—
Excess Thrift Plan (unvested)	—		—		—
Health and Welfare Benefits (1)	25,443		45,872	(4)	11,829
Disability Income (2)	—		3,857,945		—
Excise Tax Gross-Up	—		—		—
Cash Severance	363,462	(5)	—		—
Outplacement	25,000		—		—
Total	413,904		4,530,675		638,687

(1) Reflects the estimated lump sum present value of all future premiums which will be paid on behalf of Mr. Sheedy under our health and welfare benefit plans.

(2) Reflects the estimated lump sum present value of all future payments which Mr. Sheedy would be entitled to receive under our disability program. Mr. Sheedy would be entitled to receive such benefits until age 65, if he remained disabled.

(3) As of September 30, 2006, under the terms of the Visa U.S.A. Long Term Incentive Plan, Mr. Sheedy would not have been eligible for a pro rata portion of any unvested long term incentive plan award.

(4) If Mr. Sheedy was disabled, he would be eligible for health and welfare benefits for up to two years.

(5) As of September 30, 2006, Mr. Sheedy would have received four weeks of severance for each year of service.

277

Mr. Coghlan

Termination Payments & Benefits

Incremental Benefits Due to Termination Event	Involuntary Not For Cause or Good Reason Termination	Involuntary Not for Cause or Good Reason Termination (Change in Control)	Disability		Death
Long Term Incentive Plan (unvested) (1)	3,071,799	3,368,866	3,071,799		3,071,799
Thrift Plan (unvested) (2)	—	—	23,072		23,072
Excess Thrift Plan (unvested) (2)	—	—	38,974		38,974
Health and Welfare Benefits (3)	35,573	35,573	45,872	(6)	35,573
Disability Income (4)	—	—	2,179,757		—
Excise Tax Gross-Up	—	785,596	—		—
Cash Severance (5)	2,827,149	2,827,149	2,827,149		2,827,149
Outplacement	25,000	25,000	—		—
Total	5,959,521	7,042,184	8,186,622		5,966,566

(1) Except for cases of change in control, reflects the estimated lump sum present value of future long term incentive plan payments Mr. Coghlan would be entitled under the terms of his employment agreement.

(2) Under the terms of the Visa Thrift Plan and Visa Excess Thrift Plan, if an employee is terminated for reasons of disability or death, the unvested portion of their plan balances becomes due to the employee or their designated beneficiary.

(3) Reflects the estimated lump sum present value of all future premiums which will be paid on behalf of Mr. Coghlan under our health and welfare benefit plans.

(4) Reflects the estimated lump sum present value of all future payments which Mr. Coghlan would be entitled to receive under our disability program. Mr. Coghlan would be entitled to receive such benefits until age 65, if he remained disabled.

(5) Reflects the estimated lump sum present value of all future payments which Mr. Coghlan would be entitled to during the salary continuation period per the terms of his employment agreement.

(6) If Mr. Coghlan was disabled, he would be eligible for health and welfare benefits for up to two years.

Mr. Partridge

Termination Payments & Benefits

Incremental Benefits Due to Termination Event	Involuntary Not For Cause or Good Reason Termination	Involuntary Not For Cause or Good Reason Termination (Change in Control)	Disability		Death
Long Term Incentive Plan (unvested) (1)	3,819,023	4,188,353	3,819,023		3,819,023
Thrift Plan (unvested)	—	—	—		—
Excess Thrift Plan (unvested)	—	—	—		—
Health and Welfare Benefits (2)	35,573	35,573	45,872	(5)	35,573
Disability Income (3)	—	—	1,836,205		—
Excise Tax Gross-Up	—	785,596	—		—
Cash Severance (4)	1,548,808	1,548,808	1,548,808		1,548,808
Outplacement	—	—	—		—
Total	5,403,404	6,558,330	7,249,908		5,403,404

278

(1) Except for cases of voluntary termination and change in control, reflects the estimated lump sum present value of future long term incentive plan payments Mr. Partridge would be entitled to receive under the terms of his employment agreement.

(2) Reflects the estimated lump sum present value of all future premiums which will be paid on behalf of Mr. Partridge under our health and welfare benefit plans.

(3) Reflects the estimated lump sum present value of all future payments which Mr. Partridge would be entitled to receive under our disability program. Mr. Partridge would be entitled to receive such benefits until age 65, if he remained disabled.

(4) Reflects the estimated lump sum present value of all future payments which Mr. Partridge would be entitled to receive during the Salary Continuation Period per the terms of his Employment Agreement.

(5) If Mr. Partridge was disabled, he would be eligible for health and welfare benefits for up to two years.

Mr. Rodrigues

Mr. Rodrigues’s employment was terminated effective November 16, 2006. In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Rodrigues was entitled to severance of two years’ base salary and target bonus, payable in a lump sum, equal to $5,100,000. Mr. Rodrigues also received a payment of $4,083,420 equal to the prorated value of his unvested Long Term Incentive Plan awards, $106,250 in lieu of relocation payments, $704,480 in lieu of the payment he would have received from the Retirement and Excess Retirement Plans if vested, and a payment of $196,154 for unused paid time off.

Director Compensation

Joseph Saunders is currently serving as the sole director of Visa Inc. The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid to Mr. Saunders by Visa International and Visa U.S.A. during fiscal 2006 for his service on the board or directors of each company.

Director Compensation Table

(a)	(b)		(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)
Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value & Non-qualified Deferred Compensation ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Joseph Saunders	103,250	(1)	—	—	—	—	—	103,250

(1) $35,000 of the fees earned in 2006 was paid by Visa International and $68,250 was paid by Visa U.S.A.

Until the completion of the restructuring, we will not constitute our entire board of directors or establish a compensation committee. Accordingly, the compensation amounts presented in the director compensation table above may not be indicative of our future compensation that we will pay or award to our directors or fully represent our future director compensation programs and policies.

In accordance with the existing practice of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, it is expected that directors of Visa Inc. who are also full-time employees of Visa Inc. will not receive additional compensation for their services as directors. Each non-employee director of Visa Inc. will receive compensation for services on Visa Inc.’s board of directors as determined by the board of director of Visa Inc. upon the recommendation of a majority of independent directors or a compensation committee composed solely of independent directors. We expect that we will use a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain non-employee directors and to compensate directors for their service on the board in alignment with their role and involvement. In setting director compensation, we expect to consider the significant amount of time our directors will expend in fulfilling their duties to Visa Inc. as well as the skill level required of our board.

279

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following tables set forth certain information, as of     , regarding the members of Visa International and Visa U.S.A., whose respective voting power represents 5% or more of the total votes that are eligible to vote on the restructuring proposal or the equity incentive plan proposal at a member meeting, and members of Visa Canada who are entitled to vote 5% or more of the total number of votes eligible to be cast at the meeting of the members of Visa Canada in connection with which we are distributing this proxy statement-prospectus. None of the directors or executive officers of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or Visa Canada beneficially owns any of the voting power with respect to the consents solicited or votes to be cast. To the best of our knowledge, each beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power with respect to the votes that it is eligible to cast. A total number of 4,541,757,020 votes would be eligible to be cast at a meeting of members of Visa International; a total of 100,000,000 votes would be eligible to be cast at a meeting of members of Visa U.S.A.; and 164,091,714 votes are eligible to be cast at the meeting of members of Visa Canada.

Visa International

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number of Votes Eligible to be Cast	Percentage of Vote Eligible to be Cast
Visa U.S.A. Inc.	1,600,083,861	35.2	%
P.O. Box 8999
San Francisco, California 94128
Visa Europe Limited	1,564,246,889	34.4	%
1 Sheldon Square
London W26TT
United Kingdom

Visa U.S.A.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number of Votes Eligible to be Cast	Percentage of Vote Eligible to be Cast
JP Morgan Chase & Co.	23,264,727	23.3	%
270 Park Avenue New York, New York 10017-2070
Bank of America Corporation	11,539,206	11.5	%
Bank of America Corporate Center 100 N. Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255
National City Corporation	8,019,406	8.0	%
National City Center 1900 East Ninth Street Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3484
Citigroup Inc. (1)	5,535,615	5.5	%
399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10043
U.S. Bancorp	5,104,347	5.1	%
U.S. Bancorp Center 800 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

280

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number of Votes Eligible to be Cast	Percentage of Vote Eligible to be Cast
Wells Fargo & Company	5,037,284	5.0	%
420 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104

(1) Citigroup Inc.’s number of votes reflects votes eligible to be cast by its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

Visa Canada

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number of Votes Eligible to be Cast	Percentage of Vote Eligible to be Cast
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce	60,069,424	36.6	%
Commerce Court Toronto, Ontario M5L 1A2 Canada
Royal Bank of Canada	47,275,459	28.8	%
200 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario Canada
The Toronto-Dominion Bank	24,265,377	14.8	%
P.O. Box 1, Toronto-Dominion Centre King St. W. and Bay St. Toronto, Ontario M5K 1A2 Canada
The Bank of Nova Scotia	16,323,943	9.9	%
Scotia Plaza 44 King Street West Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 1H1
La Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec	12,528,847	7.6	%
100, avenue des Commandeurs Lévis (Québec) G6V 7N5 Canada

Additionally, the following table sets forth certain information, as of the date immediately following the completion of the restructuring, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our class AP, class Canada, class CEMEA, class EU (series I), class LAC and class USA common stock by each person who we believe will be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any voting class of our capital stock. None of our directors or executive officers will beneficially own any of our class AP, class Canada, class CEMEA, class EU, class LAC or class USA common stock following the restructuring. To the best of our knowledge, each beneficial owner of class AP, class Canada, class CEMEA, class EU, class LAC and class USA common stock will have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the shares that it owns. This table does not give effect to shares that may be acquired pursuant to options because no shares may be so acquired within 60 days from the date of this proxy statement-prospectus.

281

Information on the following table is based on a current estimate of the initial allocation of our common stock immediately following the restructuring closing date and is subject to amendment. The number of actual shares to be allocated to members immediately following the restructuring closing date will be determined by the share allocation formula. For a discussion of share allocation, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring.”

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Class of Visa Inc. common stock	Shares Owned	Percentage of Class
Class AP
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc.(1)	Class AP			%
7-1, Marunouchi 2-chome Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8330 Japan
The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.(2)	Class AP			%
2-7-1,Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Japan
Mitsubishi UFJ Nicos, Co. Ltd.	Class AP			%
14-1, 4-chome, Sotokanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8960 Japan
Sumitomo Mitsui Card Co., Ltd. (3).	Class AP			%
4-5-15, Imahashi, Chuo-ku, Osaka Japan
VJA	Class AP			%
4-30-6, Shimbashi Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0004 Japan
Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd. (4)	Class AP			%
120, 2-Ga, Taepyung-Ro, Jung-Gu Seoul 100-102, Korea
Citigroup Inc. (5)	Class AP			%
399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10043
Class Canada
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce	Class Canada	8,230,454.62758	37.4	%
Commerce Court Toronto, Ontario M5L 1A2 Canada
Royal Bank of Canada	Class Canada	6,319,210.95358	28.7	%
200 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario Canada

282

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Class of Visa Inc. common stock	Shares Owned	Percentage of Class
The Toronto-Dominion Bank	Class Canada	3,368,433.83738	15.3	%
P.O. Box 1, Toronto-Dominion Centre King St. W. and Bay St. Toronto, Ontario M5K 1A2 Canada
The Bank of Nova Scotia	Class Canada	2,355,568.58669	10.7	%
Scotia Plaza 44 King Street West Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 1H1
La Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec	Class Canada	1,415,773.54243	6.4	%
100, avenue des Commandeurs Lévis (Québec) G6V 7N5 Canada
Class CEMEA
FirstRand Bank	Class CEMEA			%
6th Floor 1 First Place First National Bank City Corner Simmons and Pritchard St. Johannesburg, Gauteng South Africa
ABSA Group Ltd.	Class CEMEA			%
Broadcast House 5th Floor 171 Fox Street Johannesburg South Africa
Nedbank Ltd.	Class CEMEA			%
Forum V, Braampark 33 Hoofd Street Braamfontein Johannesburg, Gauteng 2017 South Africa
Class EU
Visa Europe Limited	Class EU (series I)	62,213,201.0	100.0	%
1 Sheldon Square London W26TT United Kingdom
Visa Europe Services Inc.	Class EU (series III)	549,587.0	100.0	%
Class LAC
Companhia Brasileira de Meios de Pagamento	Class LAC			%
Av. Pres. Juscelino Kubistcheck, 1830 Sao Paulo, Brazil 045443-900

283

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Class of Visa Inc. common stock	Shares Owned	Percentage of Class
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (6)	Class LAC			%
Plaza San Nicolas 4 Bilbao, Spain 48005
BBVA Bancomer S.A.	Class LAC			%
Centro Bancomer, S.A. Avinida Universidad 1200 Co. Xoco C.P. 03339 Mexico D.F. Mexico
Citigroup Inc. (7)	Class LAC			%
399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10043
Visa Argentina S.A.	Class LAC			%
Ave. Corrientes 1437 Buenos Aires, Argentina 1042
Banco Nacional de Mexico, S.A.	Class LAC			%
Rio Mixcoac 108, Col. Barrio Actipan Mexico D.F., 03230 Mexico
Banco do Brasil S.A.	Class LAC			%
SBS Q. 1—Bloco C—Loja32 Edificio Sede III -24o. andar Asa Sul 70073-901 Brasilia, DF Brasil
Class USA
JP Morgan Chase & Co.	Class USA	99,198,579.74085	23.3	%
270 Park Avenue New York, New York 10017-2070
Bank of America Corporation	Class USA	49,202,078.09550	11.5	%
100 N. Tryon St., Bank of America Corporate Center Charlotte, NC 28255
National City Corporation	Class USA	34,193,985.50397	8.0	%
National City Center 1900 East Ninth Street Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3484
Citigroup Inc.(8)	Class USA	23,603,333.84731	5.5	%
399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10043
U.S. Bancorp	Class USA	21,764,448.81483	5.1	%
U.S. Bancorp Center 800 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402

284

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Class of Visa Inc. common stock	Shares Owned	Percentage of Class
Wells Fargo & Company	Class USA	21,764,448.81483	5.0	%
420 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104

(1) Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. class AP common stock reflects the shares of class AP common stock directly held by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., a wholly owned direct subsidiary of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., and shares of class AP common stock directly held by Mitsubishi UFJ Nicos, Co. Ltd., a majority owned subsidiary of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.

(2) The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. class AP common stock reflects the shares of class AP common stock directly held by Mitsubishi UFJ Nicos, Co. Ltd., a majority owned subsidiary of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.

(3) Sumitomo Mitsui Card Co., Ltd.’s class AP common stock reflects the shares of class AP common stock directly held by VJA, an unincorporated association controlled by Sumitomo Mitsui Card Co., Ltd.

(4) Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.’s class AP common stock reflects the shares of class AP common stock held by its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

(5) Citigroup Inc.’s class AP common stock reflects the shares of class AP common stock held by its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

(6) Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.’s class LAC common stock reflects the shares of class LAC common stock directly held by its subsidiary BBVA Bancomer S.A. and by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A.’s other subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

(7) Citigroup Inc.’s class LAC common stock reflect the shares of class LAC common stock held by its subsidiary Banco Nacional de Mexico, S.A. and Citigroup Inc.’s other subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

(8) Citigroup Inc.’s class USA common stock reflects the shares of class USA common stock held by its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

285

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Visa U.S.A. entered into a master agreement, effective as of January 1, 2005 and amended March 31, 2005, pursuant to which JPMorgan Chase agreed, among other things, to issue Visa-branded credit and debit cards in exchange for certain pricing terms, payments and other incentives. Visa U.S.A. and its affiliates provide, among other things, authorization, processing, settlement, account support, advertising and promotional services to JPMorgan Chase. Operating revenues recognized as a result of fees paid, net of incentives, from JPMorgan Chase and its affiliates, were approximately $408.5 million, $344.6 million and $219.3 million in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively, and $254.2 million in the six months ended March 31, 2007. Further, JPMorgan Chase is a party to Visa International’s 364-day credit facility, three-year revolving credit agreement and incremental credit facility. For a discussion of Visa International’s credit facilities, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Visa International—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” Charles W. Scharf, a member of Visa U.S.A.’s board of directors, is the Chief Executive Officer of Retail Financial Services, JPMorgan Chase. William I. Campbell, a member of Visa International’s board of directors and Visa U.S.A.’s board of directors, is a senior advisor of JPMorgan Chase. Immediately following the restructuring, JPMorgan Chase is expected to own 23.1% of our class USA common stock, without giving effect to the true-up.

Bank of America, N.A. and Visa U.S.A. entered into a partnership agreement dated September 5, 2003, as amended July 7, 2004 and amended and restated on September 28, 2006, pursuant to which Bank of America agreed on behalf of itself and certain of its affiliates, among other things, to issue Visa-branded credit and debit cards in exchange for certain pricing terms, payments and other incentives. Visa U.S.A. and its affiliates provide, among other things, authorization, processing, settlement, account support, advertising and promotional services to Bank of America. Operating revenues recognized as a result of fees paid, net of incentives, from Bank of America and its affiliates, were approximately $250.4 million, $223.6 million and $111.1 million in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively, and $169.7 million in the six months ended March 31, 2007. Further, Bank of America is a party to Visa International’s 364-day credit facility, three-year revolving credit agreement and incremental credit facility. For a discussion of Visa International’s credit facilities, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Visa International—Liquidity and Capital Resources.” Immediately following the restructuring, Bank of America is expected to own 11.5% of our class USA common stock, without giving effect to the true-up.

If the restructuring is completed, we will be entering into a framework agreement that will govern our relationship with Visa Europe. For a discussion of this agreement, see “Material Contracts—The Framework Agreement.”

286

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

We have provided below a summary of the material terms of certain agreements we intend to enter into upon the closing of the restructuring. These descriptions are not complete. You should read the full text of these agreements, which have been filed with the SEC as exhibits to the registration statement into which this proxy statement-prospectus is incorporated.

The Framework Agreement

The relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will be governed after the restructuring by a framework agreement, which provides for trademark and technology licenses and bilateral services.

The Trademark and Technology Licenses

Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Visa International and Inovant, as the licensors, will grant to Visa Europe exclusive, irrevocable and perpetual licenses to use the Visa trademarks and technology owned by the licensors and certain affiliates within the field of financial services, payments, related information technology and information processing services and participation in the Visa system, which we refer to as the field. Visa Europe’s region consists of the European Union and Andorra, Bear Island, Channel Island, Faeroe Island, Gibraltar, Greenland, Iceland, Isle of Man, Israel, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Norway, San Marino, Switzerland, Turkey and Vatican City, and any other jurisdiction that becomes a full member state of the European Union in the future. Visa Europe may sublicense the Visa trademarks and technology to its members and other sublicensees, such as processors, for use within Visa Europe’s region and in certain limited circumstances, outside the Visa Europe region.

From the restructuring closing date until the earlier of: (i) one year from the restructuring closing date; and (ii) the filing of a registration statement on Form S-1 for a Visa Inc. initial public offering, the fee payable for the licenses will be $6 million per quarter. Thereafter until the later of: (i) the date our shares commence trading on an internationally recognized securities exchange; and (ii) 369 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger, the fee payable for the licenses will be $142.5 million per year, payable quarterly, which we refer to as the quarterly base fee, reduced by an amount equal to $1.146 billion multiplied by the three month LIBOR rate plus 100–200 basis points. Three years after Visa Europe begins to pay the quarterly base fee, this fee will be increased annually based on the annual growth of the gross domestic product of the European Union. In each case, the quarterly base fee will be reduced by an amount equal to the product of the following: (i) our net initial public offering price per share; (ii) the number of shares of Visa Inc. held by Visa Europe (other than class EU (series II) or class C (series II) shares) that would have been redeemed immediately, but for provisions that delay the redemption of shares held by Visa Europe until one year following the date of the initial public offering; (iii) the three month LIBOR rate plus 100–200 basis points; and (iv) the number of days in that quarter which fall in the post-initial public offering period divided by 365.

Visa Europe may, at its option, license new trademarks and intellectual property and certain derivative intellectual property developed by the licensors at a fair market value royalty to be determined by Visa Inc. and Visa Europe at the time of such license grant. Additionally, Visa Inc. may, at its option, license Visa Europe’s regional clearing and settlement system at a fair market value royalty to be determined by Visa Inc. and Visa Europe at the time of such license grant.

Visa Europe must comply with certain agreed global rules governing the use and interoperability of the Visa trademarks and the interoperability of Visa Inc.’s systems with the systems of Visa Europe. If Visa Inc. wants to change a global rule or require Visa Europe to implement certain changes that would not have a positive return for Visa Europe and its members, Visa Europe is not required to implement such rule or change unless Visa Inc. agrees to pay for the implementation costs and expenses that Visa Europe and its members will incur as a consequence of the implementation to the extent necessary to return Visa Europe and its members to a neutral financial condition.

287

Both parties will be required to implement system changes required to maintain the interoperability, security, safety and soundness of the Visa system. Other system changes are required in certain circumstances where the change does not exceed a certain expenditure threshold or where the proposing party agrees to pay for such change.

In addition, the parties will guarantee the obligations of their respective members to settle transactions between such members, service global customers, participate in certain global sponsorships, manage certain global programs, establish rules for servicing global merchants, ensure that their customers and members require acceptance of globally accepted cards, maintain adequate capital levels to support their ongoing business operations and establish and comply with rules relating to the operation of the Visa enterprise.

For five years following the restructuring, Visa Inc. will not offer or promote non-Visa branded products and services within the field in Visa Europe’s region and Visa Europe will not offer or promote non-Visa branded products and services within the field outside of its region. Visa Inc. will give Visa Europe the right of first refusal prior to offering any core products in the Visa Europe region that are not branded with a Visa mark.

Visa Inc. will indemnify Visa Europe for any claims arising from activities within the field brought outside Visa Europe’s region, and Visa Europe will indemnify Visa Inc. for any claims from activities within the field brought inside Visa Europe’s region. Additionally, Visa Inc. will indemnify Visa Europe for third party claims of intellectual property infringement arising out of Visa Europe’s authorized use of the licensed Visa trademarks and technology.

The Bilateral Services

Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will provide each other with transitional and ongoing services similar to those services currently provided among Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Inovant, Visa Canada and Visa Europe. Visa Inc. will provide Visa Europe on an ongoing basis with authorization services for cross-border transactions involving Visa Europe’s region, on the one hand, and the rest of the world, on the other hand, as well as clearing and settlement system services between Visa Europe’s region and the rest of the world. Until Visa Europe’s regional clearing and settlement system is deployed, Visa Inc. will also provide clearing and settlement system services within Visa Europe’s region. In addition, the parties will share foreign exchange revenues related to currency conversion for transactions involving European cardholders as well as other cross-border transactions that take place in Visa Europe’s region until Visa Europe’s regional clearing and settlement system is deployed, at which time this arrangement will cease. The parties will also use each others’ switching and processing services.

Visa Europe will indemnify Visa Inc. for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought by Visa Europe’s member banks against Visa Inc., while Visa Inc. will indemnify Visa Europe for any claims arising out of the provision of the services brought against Visa Europe by Visa Inc.’s customer banks.

The Put-Call Option Agreement

Upon the consummation of the restructuring, Visa Inc. and Visa Europe will enter into a put-call option agreement under which Visa Europe will provide us with a call option to require Visa Europe to cause its members to convey and deliver to us all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Visa Europe. We may exercise the call option, subject to certain conditions, at any time following certain triggering events, but in any event not before the closing of our initial public offering.

A triggering event will occur if:

• There is a decline of 25% or greater in the number of merchants in the Visa Europe region that accept Visa-branded products and such rate of decline is at least twice as much as both:

• the average rate of any decline in the number of merchants in the Visa Europe region that accept general purpose payment cards for the processing of payment transactions, and

288

• if the average rate of merchant acceptance of Visa-branded general purpose payment cards has declined outside of Visa Europe’s region, the average rate of any decline in the number of merchants outside Visa Europe that accept Visa-branded general purpose payment cards for the processing of payment transactions; and

• There is a decline of 45% or more in the number of automatic teller machines, or ATMs, within Visa Europe’s region that accept Visa-branded general purpose payment product cards for the processing of credit and debit transactions, which we refer to as the ATM acceptance rate, where such decline in the ATM acceptance rate is at least twice:

• the average rate of any decline in the number of ATMs within Visa Europe’s region that accept general purpose payment cards for the processing of credit and debit transactions; and

• if the average rate of ATM acceptance of Visa-branded general purpose payment cards is declining outside of Visa Europe’s region, the average rate of decline in the number of ATMs outside of Visa Europe’s region that accept Visa-branded general purpose payment product cards for the processing of credit and debit transactions; and

• Visa Europe has failed to deliver and implement a remediation plan within six months after the later to occur of the circumstances described above, or has implemented a remediation plan but the decline in the merchant acceptance rate and ATM acceptance rate has not been stopped prior to the date that is twelve months after the implementation of the remediation plan.

In addition, we will grant Visa Europe a put option to require Visa Inc. to purchase from the Visa Europe members all of the issued shares of capital stock of Visa Europe. The put option may be exercised by Visa Europe at any time after the earlier of: (i) 365 days after the date of the consummation of an initial public offering of the class A common stock of Visa Inc. or (ii) 605 days after the closing date of our restructuring.

The price per share at which both the call option and the put option will be exercisable will be calculated by, first, multiplying (A) the sum of (i) the projected sustainable net operating income of Visa Europe and its affiliates for the 12 months starting with the beginning of the calendar quarter commencing immediately after the exercise of the relevant option, subject to certain additional adjustments to account for, among other things, assets not transferred to Visa Inc. pursuant to the relevant option, (ii) an allocable portion of the fully phased-in cost synergies that would be achievable through the contribution of the operations of Visa Europe to the net operating income of Visa Inc., on a pro forma basis, during the same twelve month period and (iii) $5,000,000 (on a pre-tax basis), by (B) a fraction, the numerator of which is the average Visa Inc. price per share on its primary listing exchange for the 30 trading days preceding the exercise of the relevant option and the denominator of which is the median I/B/E/S estimate of the net income per share of Visa Inc. common stock for the 12 months starting with the next calendar quarter immediately after the exercise of the call option or the put option, as applicable.

The resulting price per share will then be increased by the sum of (i) the fair market value of all shares of Visa Inc. common stock owned by Visa Europe or any of its affiliates that will be acquired by Visa Inc. upon the closing of the call option or the put option plus (ii) the aggregate amount of any surplus capital of Visa Europe, plus (iii) the aggregate exercise price actually received by Visa Europe on conversion or exchange of convertible or exchangeable securities, less the sum of (a) the estimated amount of one-time costs associated with achieving the allocated portion of cost synergies added to Visa Europe’s projected sustainable net operating income, plus (b) the aggregate amount of any indebtedness of Visa Europe to the extent incurred to generate surplus capital, dividends or other distributions to shareholders of Visa Europe, plus (c) without duplication, the aggregate amount of any contingent liabilities with respect to Visa Europe or the business and assets acquired by Visa Inc. If the call option or the put option is settled on a date that is prior to the date that is three years after the consummation of the initial public offering, we will have the option to deliver the option exercise price entirely in cash or a portion in cash and a portion in our publicly traded common stock up to a specified percentage that is tied to a formula based on the percentage of class C common stock originally received by all holders of class C common stock other than Visa Europe which will have been redeemed by us or which will have become freely transferable without restriction.

289

Visa Europe in its sole discretion may determine to include or exclude some or all of its non-core Visa assets in the put option or the call option as the case may be.

Visa Europe has agreed that Visa Europe will not, prior to an exercise of the put option or the call option, conduct an initial public offering of any capital stock of Visa Europe unless the Visa Europe business of authorizing, clearing and settling payments transactions branded under the Visa marks and those rights, assets, operations and properties that are solely used in or solely related to conducting the foregoing business would be transferred back to Visa Europe or a subsidiary thereof prior to the consummation of the put option or the call option, as the case may be.

The Loss Sharing Agreement

As promptly as practicable following the signing of the restructuring agreement, we intend to enter into a loss sharing agreement with Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and certain member banks of Visa U.S.A. The loss sharing agreement provides for the indemnification of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and, in certain circumstances, Visa Inc. with respect to a Visa litigation obligation in any of the covered litigation. As used in the loss sharing agreement, a Visa litigation obligation includes (i) the amount of a final judgment paid by Visa U.S.A. or Visa International after the operation of any judgment sharing agreement, plus any amounts reimbursable to judgment sharing agreement signatories or (ii) the damages portion of a settlement of a covered litigation that is approved as required under Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation by the vote of Visa U.S.A.’s members. The several obligation of each bank that is a party to the loss sharing agreement will equal the amount of any final judgment enforceable against Visa International, Visa U.S.A. or any other signatory to a judgment sharing agreement to which Visa International or Visa U.S.A. is a party, or the amount of any approved settlement of a covered litigation, multiplied by such bank’s then-current membership proportion as calculated in accordance with Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation.

Visa U.S.A. will be responsible for the remainder of any Visa litigation obligation after taking into account the total amounts owed by the banks that are parties to the loss sharing agreement and any funds it recovers pursuant to a judgment sharing agreement. Such remainder amounts are subject to indemnification by Visa U.S.A. members that are not parties to the loss sharing agreement pursuant to Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements.

We contemplate that payments due under any covered litigation that are subject to the loss sharing agreement will be paid out of the escrow account to be established in connection with our initial public offering, including any additional proceeds from the sale of loss shares that may be contributed to the escrow account, and through adjustments to the conversion ratios of the shares of class B stock issued to the Visa U.S.A. members. For a description of the escrow account, sale of loss shares and provisions of our certificate of incorporation relating to the member banks’ conversion ratios, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement” and “Description of Capital Stock of Visa Inc.” If all available funds in the escrow account (including funds from the sale of loss shares) are insufficient to satisfy a Visa litigation obligation, then each bank that is a party to the loss sharing agreement is required to contribute an amount equal to the unsatisfied Visa litigation obligation multiplied by such party’s then-current membership proportion as calculated in accordance with Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation.

In order to avoid a double payment as a result of the dilutive adjustment in the conversion ratio of the class B shares upon the establishment of the escrow account, in the event that a signatory bank is required to make a payment under the loss sharing agreement prior to the initial public offering and the initial public offering is subsequently completed, such bank will be entitled to reimbursement of amounts paid by it to the extent that there are sufficient funds in the escrow account. Similarly, in order to avoid a double payment by Visa U.S.A. members that are signatories to the loss sharing agreement and make payments pursuant to a judgment sharing agreement in a covered litigation, such parties to a judgment sharing agreement are also entitled to the reimbursement of funds paid with respect to the portion of a judgment or settlement that is not allocated to the

290

conduct of MasterCard. In the event that the escrow account contains insufficient funds to pay a judgment or settlement and to reimburse Visa U.S.A. members for their reimbursable judgment sharing or loss sharing payments, all payments and reimbursements will be made pro rata.

We have agreed as part of the loss sharing agreement to use our commercially reasonable efforts to complete the Visa Inc. initial public offering within 120 days after the closing of the restructuring. If we do not complete the Visa Inc. initial public offering by the 240^th day after the closing of the restructuring, the signing banks may approve (by a two-thirds majority of the membership interests of the signing banks) a suspension of the members’ obligations under the loss sharing agreement until the completion of our initial public offering, at which point their obligations will be reinstated in full as if they had never been suspended.

The Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement

As promptly as practicable after the signing of the restructuring agreement, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International expect to enter into a judgment sharing agreement, which we refer to as the interchange judgment sharing agreement, in connection with the current litigation pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, 1:05-md-01720-JG-JO (E.D.N.Y.) and Kendall vs. Visa U.S.A., Inc. et al., Case No. CO4-4276 JSW (N.D. Cal.), now on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. We collectively refer to these cases as the interchange litigation. For a description of the interchange litigation, see “Business of Visa Inc.—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Covered Litigation—Interchange Litigation.” The interchange judgment sharing agreement will also apply to any additional case that includes claims for damages relating to the period prior to the initial public offering that is transferred for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings at any time to the interchange litigation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation or otherwise included at any time in the interchange litigation by order of any court of competent jurisdiction.

Under the interchange judgment sharing agreement, in the event that a final judgment in the interchange litigation is enforced against a signatory or there is a global settlement involving all signatories, each signatory other than Visa U.S.A. and Visa International will pay its membership proportion of the amount of any final judgment executed against a signatory that is not allocated to the conduct of MasterCard under the terms of the agreement. Visa U.S.A. will pay the amount of such final judgment executed against a signatory that is not allocated to the conduct of MasterCard and that is not accounted for by the other signatories, although it will obtain reimbursement for such payments out of the escrow account. Visa International has no obligation under the interchange judgment sharing agreement to share in a judgment enforced against another signatory or in a global settlement. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International will be reimbursed by the bank signatories for the full amount of any final judgment allocated to the conduct of MasterCard, but have no obligation to the other signatories with respect to the MasterCard portion of a final judgment.

If Visa Inc. is named as a defendant in a case in the interchange litigation, it has the right to join the judgment sharing agreement on the terms applicable to Visa International unless a claim relates to the conduct of Visa Inc. after the restructuring (other than the restructuring itself or an initial public offering) or conduct of Visa Inc. that is not the mere continuation of conduct that is being challenged in the interchange litigation as of the closing of the restructuring.

291

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF VISA INC.

The following summary of our capital stock describes the material terms of our capital stock and is not complete. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable Delaware law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws. For a complete description, we refer you to Visa Inc.’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and Visa Inc.’s amended and restated bylaws, which are attached as Annexes C and D to this proxy statement-prospectus.

Capitalization

The total number of shares of all classes of stock that we are authorized to issue is 2,004,199,484,030 shares. Our authorized capital stock consists of:

• 2,001,622,245,209 shares of class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

• 622,245,209 shares of class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

• 917,165,602 shares of class C common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The class C common stock is sub-divided into the following four series of class C common stock: (i) 813,582,801 shares of class C (series I) common stock; (ii) 38,582,801 shares of class C (series II) common stock; (iii) 64,000,000 shares of class C (series III) common stock; and (iv) 1,000,000 shares of class C (series IV) common stock;

• 622,245,209 shares of class USA common stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

• 103,582,801 shares of class EU common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The class EU common stock is sub-divided into the following three series of class EU common stock: (i) 64,000,000 shares of class EU (series I) common stock; and (ii) 38,582,801 shares of class EU (series II) common stock 1,000,000 shares of class EU (series III) common stock;

• 25,000,000 shares of class Canada common stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

• 130,000,000 shares of class AP common stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

• 90,000,000 shares of class LAC common stock, par value $0.0001 per share;

• 42,000,000 shares of class CEMEA common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; and

• 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

Immediately following the restructuring closing date, there will be issued and outstanding 557,982,489 shares of class USA common stock, 90,667,252 shares of class EU common stock (which will consist of 62,213,201 shares of class EU (series I) common stock, 27,904,464 shares of class EU (series II) common stock and 549,587 shares of class EU (series III) common stock), 22,034,685 shares of class Canada common stock, 119,100,481 shares of class AP common stock, 80,137,915 shares of class LAC common stock and 36,749,698 shares of class CEMEA common stock, all of which will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable, which together we refer to as our regional classes of common stock. As of such date, no shares of our class A common stock, class B common stock, class C common stock or preferred stock will be issued and outstanding.

Holders of a majority in voting power of our stock entitled to vote thereon may increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of any preferred stock, class A common stock, class B common stock, class C common stock or, prior to the completion of the true-up distribution date, any regional class of common stock, but not below the number of shares of that class then outstanding, and no vote or action by the holders of any of the preferred stock, class A common stock, class B common stock, class C common stock or regional class of common stock, voting separately as a class, is required.

Prior to the date on which the initial public offering of our class A common stock is closed, we do not intend to issue any shares of class A common stock, except in connection with such initial public offering or pursuant to the terms of any equity-based compensation plan approved by our board of directors.

292

Conversion

The issuance of the regional classes of common stock is designed to facilitate the true-up of ownership of our common stock among our stockholders prior to our initial public offering. For a discussion of the conversion of our regional classes of common stock, see “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring—True-Up of Merger Consideration.” As a result of the true-up, each of the regional classes of common stock will be converted into class C common stock or, in the case of the class USA common stock, class B common stock prior to the initial public offering of our common stock.

If any share of our class B common stock or class C common stock is transferred to a person that is not or was not, immediately after the consummation of the restructuring, the beneficial owner of any shares of any regional class of common stock, or a member of Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe or Visa Canada or an affiliate of any such persons (which we refer to as a Visa member), such share will automatically be converted into a number of shares of our class A common stock based upon the applicable conversion rate in effect at the time of such transfer with respect to such transferred shares of class B common stock or class C common stock.

The conversion rate applicable to any transfer of shares of our class C common stock shall always be 1:1 (i.e., one share of class C common stock will, upon transfer, be converted into one share of class A common stock), subject to adjustments for stock splits, recapitalizations and similar transactions.

Until the closing of our initial public offering, the conversion rate applicable to our shares of class B common stock will be 1:1. This conversion rate will automatically be adjusted upon the closing of our initial public offering and, thereafter, will be further adjusted upon the issuance of any shares of our class A common stock which are designated as loss shares, the net proceeds of which are to be used to replenish the escrow account in connection with the covered litigation, and will also be adjusted upon the final resolution of the covered litigation and the disbursement to Visa Inc. of any funds then remaining on deposit in the escrow account. These adjustments will be made automatically, such that one share of class B common stock is convertible into a number of shares of class A common stock determined based upon the following formulae:

• 1.0 x (A + B), during the period between the closing of our initial public offering and the final resolution of the covered litigation; and

• 1.0 x (A + B + C), after the final resolution of all of the covered litigation.

For purposes of these formulae:

“A” will be a fraction:

• the numerator of which is:

• the number of shares of our class B common stock (disregarding any shares of our class B common stock that are owned by a subsidiary of Visa Inc.) that are outstanding after the redemption of shares of our class B common stock and class C common stock following the closing of our initial public offering, which we refer to as the class B number, minus

• an amount equal to the aggregate escrow amount divided by the price per share received by Visa Inc. (net of underwriting discounts and commissions) for class A common stock issued in our initial public offering; and

• the denominator of which is the class B number.

“B” will be a fraction:

• the numerator of which is the number of loss shares that have been issued; and

• the denominator of which is the class B number.

293

“C” will be a fraction:

• the numerator of which is the quotient obtained by dividing the aggregate portion of the escrow amount disbursed to Visa Inc. from the escrow account after the final resolution of the covered litigation (other than certain tax distributions and reimbursements related to the loss sharing agreement) by the greater of $0.01 or the volume-weighted average price per share of our class A common stock during the 90 trading day period ending on the third trading day immediately preceding the date on which the covered litigation is finally resolved; and

• the denominator of which is the class B number.

After the date on which all of the covered litigation has been finally resolved, any amounts remaining on deposit in the escrow account with respect to the covered litigation will be released to Visa Inc. When this happens, the conversion rate applicable to any transfer of shares of our class B common stock will automatically be adjusted in favor of the holders of our class B common stock (i.e., such that a lesser number of shares of class B common stock are required in order to convert into a single share of class A common stock), to the extent of the aggregate amount released to Visa Inc. from the escrow account, taking into account the weighted average trading price of our class A common stock at such time, as described above.

Such conversions of shares of class B common stock or class C common stock will not occur except in connection with: (i) a sale of such shares on a securities exchange on which shares of class A common stock are listed by means of a “brokers’ transaction” within the meaning of paragraph (g) of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933; or (ii) a private placement of such shares to a person who is not a Visa member or an affiliate of a Visa member. Furthermore, no such conversion will be effected until the expiration of all applicable restrictions on transfer of such shares, which are described in the paragraph entitled “—Our Common Stock—Transfer Restrictions.”

If, at any time after the consummation of our initial public offering, any shares of our class A common stock are acquired by a Visa member or any person that is an operator, member or licensee of a general purpose payment card system that competes with Visa Inc., or any affiliate of such person, such shares will automatically be converted on a one-for-one basis into shares of our class C (series I) common stock.

However, such automatic conversion shall not apply with respect to any shares of class A common stock acquired by a Visa member other than shares of class A common stock acquired by such Visa member for its own account as a principal investor or for the account of an affiliate of such Visa member that is acting as a principal investor. Without limiting the foregoing, such automatic conversion shall not apply to any shares of class A common stock acquired or held by a Visa member, a similar person or any of their respective affiliates in connection with its brokerage, market making, custody, investment management or similar operations or acquired by any investment fund managed by a Visa member, a similar person or any of their respective affiliates.

Such conversions are subject to customary adjustments for reclassifications, splits and subdivisions of shares of common stock.

Redemption

Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock Other than Class C (Series II) Common Stock

Each share of our class B common stock and class C common stock is redeemable in the manner provided in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. We intend to fund the redemption of certain of our shares of class B common stock and class C common stock with a portion of the net proceeds of an initial public offering of our class A common stock.

294

No later than twenty business days prior to the date of the closing of our initial public offering, the litigation committee described above under the heading “The Global Restructuring Agreement—The Restructuring—Covered Litigation” will notify us of the percentage of the expected net proceeds of our initial public offering, which is to be deposited into the escrow account established with respect to the covered litigation. No later than two business days prior to the closing of our initial public offering, our board of directors will determine the amount of the net proceeds of our initial public offering that will be used to redeem shares of our class B common stock and class C common stock following the consummation of our initial public offering. This amount, which we refer to as the aggregate redemption amount, will be an amount equal to the net proceeds received by Visa Inc. from the initial public offering, minus an amount determined by our board of directors to be an appropriate amount of funds to be retained by Visa Inc. for general corporate purposes, minus the escrow amount notified to us by the litigation committee and minus $1,146,000,000, which will be used to pay the redemption price to redeem shares of our class C (series II) common stock as described below.

Within twenty business days after the consummation of our initial public offering, Visa Inc. will deliver a notice to holders of our outstanding class B common stock and class C common stock, notifying them of the amount of the aggregate redemption amount, the escrow amount, the number of shares of class B common stock or class C common stock to be redeemed from the holder, and the date on which the redemption will occur, which we refer to as the redemption date and which must not be a date later than thirty days after the date on which the notice is delivered.

On the redemption date:

• Visa Inc. will redeem from holders of its class B common stock (other than any common stock owned by any subsidiary of Visa Inc.) for a price per share equal to the price per share of class A common stock we receive in the initial public offering (net of any underwriting discounts and commissions), which we refer to as the initial public offering price, an aggregate number of shares of class B common stock determined as follows. The aggregate number of class B shares redeemed will be equal to the sum of the aggregate redemption amount and the escrow amount, multiplied by the percentage that the outstanding shares of class B common stock represents in relation to the total number of shares of all outstanding shares of class B and class C common stock (other than any class C (series II) common stock or any common stock owned by any subsidiary of Visa Inc.), minus the escrow amount. This amount will then be divided by the initial public offering price.

• Visa Inc. will redeem from holders of its class C common stock (other than any class C (series II) common stock), for a price per share equal to the initial public offering price, an aggregate number of shares of class C common stock determined as follows. The aggregate number of class C shares redeemed will be equal to the sum of the aggregate redemption amount and the escrow amount, multiplied by the percentage that the outstanding shares of class C common stock represents in relation to the total number of shares of all outstanding shares of class B and class C common stock (disregarding any shares of class C (series II) common stock and any shares of common stock owned by a subsidiary of Visa Inc.). This amount will then be divided by the initial public offering price (net of any underwriting discounts and commissions).

The ratable portion of the class C (series III) common stock and class C (series IV) common stock so redeemed shall be determined by treating the class C (series III) common stock and class C (series IV) common stock as a single series for purposes of this redemption, and holders of class C (series III) common stock will have a priority over holders of class C (series IV) common stock, such that all of the shares of class C (series III) common stock are redeemed in such redemption before any of the shares of class C (series IV) common stock are redeemed.

If the redemption described above would occur earlier than the date that is 369 days after the date on which Inovant Inc. is merged into Visa Inc. in connection with the restructuring, the date of which merger we refer to as the Inovant U.S. holdco merger effective time, then Visa Europe will be entitled to defer the redemption of the shares of class C common stock owned by Visa Europe that would otherwise have been redeemed until such

295

369^th day (or to the next succeeding business day if such 369^th day is not a business day). During this deferral period, Visa Europe will continue to enjoy the economic and beneficial entitlement to the shares of class C common stock that are subject to such deferred redemption, and the shares will remain subject to applicable transfer restrictions contained in our certificate of incorporation.

Class C (Series II) Common Stock

We are entitled to redeem all, but not less than all, of the class C (series II) common stock held by Visa Europe by written notice to Visa Europe delivered at any time after the later of the consummation of an initial public offering of our class A common stock or 369 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger effective time. In addition, Visa Europe is entitled to require us to redeem all, but not less than all, of the class C (series II) common stock held by Visa Europe by giving us written notice delivered at any time after the later of 60 days after the consummation of an initial public offering of our class A common stock or 429 days after the Inovant U.S. holdco merger effective time. The redemption price per share will be equal to the aggregate redemption price described below divided by the aggregate number of shares of class C (series II) common stock issued and outstanding on the date of redemption. The aggregate redemption price will be equal to:

• $1.146 billion; plus

• the aggregate subscription price paid by Visa Europe in respect of additional shares of class C (series II) common stock issued to Visa Europe, if any, as described below under “—Preemptive Rights;” minus

• the sum of:

• the aggregate amount of all dividends and other distributions declared and paid on outstanding shares of class C (series II) common stock or class EU (series II) common stock, as applicable, during the period from the restructuring closing date to the date of the redemption; and

• an amount equal to the product of: (i) each dividend or other distribution declared and paid on outstanding shares of class C (series II) common stock or class EU (series II) common stock, as applicable, during the period from the restructuring closing date to the date of redemption; and (ii) a rate per annum, compounded quarterly, equal to 3-month LIBOR + 100 basis points from the applicable date of declaration thereof and ending on the first quarter date after such date. Starting from the end of the first quarter after the earlier to occur of the first anniversary of the closing of the restructuring and the filing of the registration statement with respect to our initial public offering, such interest rate will increase by 25 basis points each quarter, up to a maximum rate of 3-month LIBOR + 200 basis points.

The redemption of our shares of class C (series II) common stock described above, like the redemption of shares of class B common stock and class C common stock (other than the class C (series II) common stock) following our initial public offering, is required to be made out of the capital of Visa Inc., and not out of surplus. Our certificate of incorporation provides that, if necessary and to the extent permitted by the DGCL and other applicable laws, our board of directors will increase the capital of the Visa Inc. by directing that any surplus be transferred to capital, in order to ensure that there is sufficient capital to effect such redemptions out of capital. If we have insufficient capital for redemption of all shares of class C (series II) common stock on the redemption date, the capital that is legally available will be used to redeem the maximum possible number of such shares ratably among the holders of such shares to be redeemed. The shares of class C (series II) common stock not redeemed will remain outstanding and entitled to all the rights and preferences provided in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. As soon as practicable thereafter when additional capital is legally available for the redemption of shares of class C (series II) common stock, such capital will immediately be used to redeem the balance of the shares that we have become obliged to redeem on such redemption date but that we have not redeemed.

296

Fractional Shares

Except with respect to shares of our regional classes of common stock, and any shares of class B common stock or class C common stock into which shares of our regional classes may be converted in the true-up process, we will not issue any fractional shares of any class of common stock upon conversion of any shares of any other class of common stock into shares of such class. In lieu of fractional shares, we will pay cash equal to such fractional amount multiplied by the fair market value, as determined by or in accordance with procedures established by our board of directors, per share of the applicable class of common stock into which such shares are being converted, as of the conversion date.

Preemptive Rights

The restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. provides that, during the period from the closing of our restructuring until the final resolution of the covered litigation, neither Visa Inc. nor any of its subsidiaries shall issue any shares of capital stock to any person without the prior written consent of a majority of the members of the litigation committee, other than any issuance of:

• shares of common stock (or other applicable equity interests in the case of any subsidiary of Visa Inc.) on or before the date of the restructuring agreement;

• shares of common stock (or other applicable equity interests in the case of any subsidiary of Visa Inc.) after the date of the restructuring agreement pursuant to the terms of the restructuring agreement or any other of the documents entered in to in connection with our restructuring, including any loss shares, any shares of class C (series II) common stock issued pursuant to the restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. and any securities issued upon the conversion or exchange of any shares of common stock issued pursuant to the terms of the restructuring agreement that are convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock;

• shares of common stock (or other applicable equity interests in the case of any subsidiary of Visa Inc.) issued upon the direct or indirect conversion of any options or convertible securities issued pursuant to any option plan or other employee incentive plan approved by our board of directors;

• shares of common stock issued in payment of the option exercise price following an exercise of the put option or the call option under our put-call option agreement with Visa Europe;

• shares of class A common stock in connection with any public offering of class A common stock that our board of directors determines in good faith is desirable in order to reduce the percentage ownership of common stock represented by the holders of class B common stock and class C common stock, in the aggregate, to less than 50%, including, without limitation, our initial public offering;

• shares of class A common stock (whether or not such shares constitute loss shares) sold in a public offering, the proceeds of which are to be used, as determined in good faith by our board of directors, to fund operating losses or other extraordinary losses or liabilities, or in other exigent circumstances as determined in good faith by our board of directors;

• shares of common stock or preferred stock (or other applicable equity interests in the case of any subsidiary of Visa Inc.) issued as consideration in any merger or recapitalization of Visa Inc. or issued as consideration in an acquisition of any person by Visa Inc.;

• shares of common stock or preferred stock (or other applicable equity interests in the case of any subsidiary of Visa Inc.) issued to any person (in an aggregate number of shares, with respect to each such person, not to exceed (immediately after giving effect to such issuance) 10% of the outstanding capital stock of Visa Inc. of all classes and series, if such issuance is to a person as to which our board of directors has determined that a relationship with such person would result in a material strategic benefit to us;

• shares of common stock or preferred stock (or other applicable equity interests in the case of any subsidiary of Visa Inc.) in an aggregate number of shares not to exceed (immediately after giving effect

297

to such issuance) 3% of the outstanding capital stock of Visa Inc. of all classes and series, issued as part of any financing transaction approved by our board of directors, so long as such securities are not a material component of such financing transaction; and

• shares of common stock (or other applicable equity interests in the case of any subsidiary of Visa Inc.) issued in connection with any stock split or stock dividend of the securities of Visa Inc. to all holders of such securities on a pro rata basis.

In general, except as described in the paragraph below, no holders of any shares of our common stock or preferred stock will be entitled to preemptive rights to subscribe for any shares of any class or series of our capital stock, except as may be provided in any preferred stock designation, any resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of a series of stock adopted by our board of directors or any agreement between us and our stockholders. We have no current plans to grant preemptive rights by a resolution of our board of directors or through any agreement with our stockholders.

The restructuring has been designed in order that Visa Europe may be in a position to qualify for the “substantial shareholding” tax exemption under English law. Under English law, a holder of a “substantial shareholding” may be in a position to qualify for an exemption from capital gains tax upon a disposition of those shares if it holds the shares throughout a continuous period of 12 months, beginning not more than 24 months prior to the disposition of such shares. For these purposes, a “substantial shareholding” means shares entitling the holder to not less than 10% of a company’s ordinary share capital, not less than 10% of the profits available for distribution to equity holders and not less than 10% of the assets of the company available for distribution to equity holders upon a winding up of the company. In order to enable Visa Europe to be in a position to qualify for this exemption, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation states that if, at any time prior to the date that is 369 days after the date on which the Inovant U.S. holdco merger effective time occurs, there occurs any transaction or other event as a result of which the shares of the class EU (series I) common stock, class EU (series II) common stock, class EU (series III) common stock, class C (series II) common stock, class C (series III) common stock or class C (series IV) common stock (or the common stock into which any such class EU or class C common stock may convert or has been converted) owned by Visa Europe and VESI would represent, in the aggregate, less than 10% of: (i) our ordinary share capital (within the meaning of Section 832 Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988); (ii) our profits available for distribution to our “equity holders” (computed in accordance with Schedule 18 Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, as adapted by paragraph 8 Schedule 7AC of the English Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act of 1992, or TCGA); and (iii) the assets that would be available to our equity holders upon our dissolution or other winding up (or any such other event with respect to our share capital occurs as would cause Visa Europe to fail the “substantial shareholding” test as set out in paragraph 8 Schedule 7AC of the TCGA in respect of its holding of shares of common stock), then such transaction or other event will have no effect unless we issue to Visa Europe, prior thereto, a number of shares of class C (series II) common stock (or class EU (series II)) common stock if prior to the true up distribution date) such that, immediately after giving effect to such issuances, the shares of class EU (series I) common stock, class EU (series II) common stock, class EU (series III) common stock, class C (series II) common stock, class C (series III) common stock and class C (series IV) common stock (or the common stock into which any such class EU or class C common stock may convert or has been converted) owned by Visa Europe and VESI represent, in the aggregate, at least 10% of: (i) our ordinary share capital; (ii) our profits available for distribution to our equity holders; and (iii) the assets that would be available to our equity holders upon our dissolution or other winding up, such that the test referred to above would be satisfied. The issuance of such additional shares of class EU (series II) common stock or class C (series II) common stock will be made in consideration of the payment by Visa Europe to us of a subscription price equal to the aggregate fair market value thereof. The first installment of such subscription price, in an amount equal to the aggregate par value of the additional shares of class C (series II) common stock to be issued to Visa Europe, shall be paid by Visa Europe at the time of issuance. The balance of the subscription price shall be paid by Visa Europe contemporaneously with the redemption of the class C (series II) common stock, by means of an offset against the aggregate redemption price payable to Visa Europe in respect of the redemption of its shares of class C (series II) common stock.

298

Our Common Stock

Voting Rights. Prior to the true-up distribution date, each holder of shares of a regional class of common stock (other than class EU (series II) common stock) will have the right to cast a number of votes equal to the number of shares into which they would be converted in accordance with the applicable conversion rate in effect on the record date for such vote. For information on the share conversion rates see “—Conversion” above. Each holder of shares of class EU (series II) common stock will have no right to vote on any matters on which our stockholders generally are entitled to vote; provided, however, that a separate class vote of holders of class EU (series II) common stock will be required to approve any amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that adversely affects holders of class EU (series II) common stock but does not so affect any other classes of series of common stock. In such situations, each holder of shares of class EU (series II) common stock is entitled to one vote per share of class EU (series II) common stock.

During the period from and after the true-up distribution date and prior to the date of consummation of the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock, each holder of shares of class B common stock and each holder of shares of class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) will have the right to cast a number of votes equal to the number of shares of class A common stock into which each share of class B common stock or class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) would be converted. During such period, each holder of shares of class C (series II) common stock will have no right to vote on any matters on which our stockholders generally are entitled to vote; provided, however, that a separate class vote of holders of class C (series II) common stock will be required to approve any amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that adversely affects holders of class C (series II) common stock but does not so affect any other classes of series of common stock. In such situations, each holder of shares of class C (series II) common stock is entitled to one vote per share of class C (series II) common stock.

From and after the consummation of an initial public offering of shares of class A common stock, each holder of shares of class A common stock will have the right to cast one vote for each share of class A common stock held of record by such holder on all matters on which our stockholders generally are entitled to vote. During such period, each holder of shares of class B common stock and each holder of shares of class C common stock will have no right to vote on any matters on which stockholders generally are entitled to vote, other than the right, in addition to any other vote required by law, to cast a number of votes equal to the number of shares of class A common stock into which such shares of class B common stock or class C common stock (other than the class C (series II) common stock), as applicable, would be converted in accordance with the applicable conversion rate in effect on the record date for such vote on the following matters:

• any consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction in which shares of class A common stock are exchanged for, converted into or changed into other stock or securities, or the right to receive cash or other property, unless the shares of class B common stock and the shares of class C common stock of all series, will be exchanged for or changed into the same per share amount of stock, securities, cash or any other property, as the case may be, in which or for which each share of class A common stock is exchanged, converted or changed. Any such vote will require the approval of a majority of the voting power of the class B common stock and class C (series I) common stock (and prior to the conversion thereof into shares of class C (series I) common stock, the class C (series III) common stock and class C (series IV) common stock), voting together as a single class (in which vote the class A common stock and class C (series II) common stock will not participate) separate from all other classes or series of our capital stock, on an as converted basis; and

• any decision by us to exit our core payments business, i.e., to no longer operate a consumer debit/credit payments business. Any such vote will require the approval of at least 80% of the voting power of the common stock of all classes and series other than the class EU (series II) common stock or class C (series II) common stock, as applicable, voting together as a single class (in which vote the class EU (series II) common stock or class C (series II) common stock will not participate) separate from all other classes or series of our capital stock.

299

Dividend and Distribution Rights. Subject to any limitations contained in the DGCL, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the rights, if any, of the holders of any outstanding series of preferred stock or any class or series of stock having a preference over or the right to participate with the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends, the holders of shares of class A common stock, class B common stock, class C common stock, regardless of series thereof or, prior to the true-up distribution date, any regional class of common stock, as applicable, are entitled to share ratably (on an as converted basis as described below in the case of the holders of the class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock) in dividends or distributions paid on the common stock, regardless of class or series, and no dividend or distribution may be declared or paid on any class or series of common stock unless an equivalent dividend is contemporaneously declared and paid on each other class and series of common stock.

We may make a share distribution consisting of shares of any class or series of our securities or the securities of any other person or entity other than common stock, or securities that are convertible into, exchangeable for or evidence the right to purchase shares of common stock, either on the basis of a distribution of identical securities, on an equal per share basis, to holders of shares of class A common stock, class B common stock and class C common stock or, if prior to the true-up distribution date, any regional class of common stock, provided that:

• the securities distributed (and, if applicable, the securities into which the distributed securities are convertible, or for which they are exchangeable, or which the distributed securities evidence the right to purchase) do not differ in any respect other than their relative voting rights and related differences in designation, conversion and share distribution provisions, with holders of shares of our class B common stock and class C common stock (or, if prior to the true-up distribution date, any regional class of common stock) receiving the class or series having the higher relative voting rights;

• if the securities distributed constitute capital stock of one of our subsidiaries, voting rights and related difference in designation, conversion and share distribution provisions, will not differ to a greater extent than the corresponding differences in such rights between the class B common stock and class C common stock or, if prior to the true-up distribution date, the regional classes of common stock; and

• in each case such distribution is otherwise made on an equal per share basis.

Liquidation Rights. Upon our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably on an as converted basis in the net assets available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of our debts and other liabilities, subject to the prior rights of any issued preferred shares. Neither the voluntary sale, conveyance, exchange or transfer for cash, shares of stock, securities or other consideration of all or substantially all of our property or assets nor our consolidation or merger with or into one or more other corporations will be deemed to be a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, voluntary or involuntary, unless such voluntary sale, conveyance, exchange or transfer will be in connection with a dissolution or winding-up of our business.

Mergers, Consolidation, Etc. If we enter into any consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction in which shares of common stock are exchanged for, converted into, or otherwise changed into other stock or securities, or the right to receive cash or any other property, such shares of common stock will be exchanged for or changed into the same per share amount of stock, securities, cash or any other property, as the case may be, into which or for which each share of any other class of common stock is exchanged or changed, on an “as converted” basis.

For purposes of the paragraphs entitled “—Dividend and Distribution Rights,” “—Liquidation Rights” and “—Mergers, Consolidation, Etc.,” and the section entitled “Comparison of Rights of Members Prior to and After the Restructuring,” “as converted” means that each holder of class B common stock, each holder of class C common stock or, prior to the true-up distribution date, each holder of any regional class of common stock, will

300

be entitled to its ratable portion of: (x) any dividend or distribution in case of dividend rights; (y) any assets available for distribution in case of liquidation rights; or (z) any stock, securities, cash or other consideration in such consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction, as the case may be, in case of a merger or consolidation, in each case based upon the number of shares of class A common stock into which the shares of class B common stock or class C common stock, as applicable, beneficially owned by such holder would be converted, assuming, immediately prior to such vote on such distribution or dividend, liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or the consummation of such consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction, as applicable: (i) the conversion (if prior to the true-up distribution date) of all outstanding shares of class USA common stock into class B common stock (on a one-for-one basis); (ii) the conversion (if prior to the true-up distribution date) of all outstanding shares of regional classes of common stock other than class USA common stock into class C common stock of the applicable series thereof (on a one-for one basis); and (iii) the conversion of all outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock (immediately after the conversions described in the foregoing clauses (i) and (ii), if applicable) into class A common stock, based on the applicable conversion rate then in effect. The applicable conversion rate with respect to our class C common stock shall always be 1:1 (i.e., one share of class C common stock will, upon transfer, be converted into one share of class A common stock), subject to adjustments for stock splits, recapitalizations and similar transactions.

The applicable conversion rate with respect to our shares of our class B common stock will be 1:1 prior to the consummation of an initial public offering of our class C common stock. From the date on which our initial public offering is consummated until the date on which all of the covered litigation has been finally resolved, the conversion rate applicable to any transfer of shares of our class B common stock will be adjusted downward (i.e., such that a greater number of shares of class B common stock are required in order to convert into a single share of class A common stock). This adjustment to the conversion rate will initially be based upon the amount of the escrow established from the net proceeds of our initial public offering that will be set aside in order to satisfy liabilities incurred in connection with the covered litigation. The class B conversion rate will also be subject to additional adjustments in the event of any subsequent primary offerings of our class A common stock, which we refer to as loss shares, the proceeds of which are to be used to replenish the escrow established to fund liabilities in connection with the covered litigation.

After the date on which all of the covered litigation has been finally resolved, any amounts remaining on deposit in the escrow account with respect to the covered litigation will be released to Visa Inc. When this happens, the conversion rate applicable to any transfer of shares of our class B common stock will automatically be adjusted upward (such that a lesser number of shares of class B common stock are required in order to convert into a single share of class A common stock), to the extent of the aggregate amount released to Visa Inc. from the escrow account.

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue up to 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue these shares in one or more series; to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each series; and to fix the designation, voting power, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and any of its qualifications, limitations or restrictions. Unless otherwise provided in the certificate of designation with respect to any preferred stock, our board of directors may increase or decrease the number of shares of any series, but not below the number of shares of that series then outstanding. Our board of directors may not authorize the issuance of preferred stock that adversely and disproportionately affects the rights or privileges of any class or series of common stock in relation to any other class or series of common stock. Our board may not authorize the issuance of preferred stock that is convertible into class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock. We currently have no plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

301

Transfer Restrictions

Shares of our class USA common stock and class B common stock are not transferable until the later of the third anniversary of the consummation of an initial public offering of our class A common stock or the escrow termination date. Our regional classes of stock, other than our class USA stock, and our class C common stock are not transferable until the third anniversary of the consummation of an initial public offering of our class A common stock. The above-described limitations on transfer are, however, subject to the following exceptions:

• any transfer by Visa Inc. to the initial holders of any regional class of common stock, class B common stock or class C common stock;

• any transfer upon the redemption of shares of class B common stock or class C common stock as provided in the restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc.;

• any transfer by Visa Inc. to any person or entity or by the holders thereof to Visa Inc.;

• any transfer after the true-up distribution date of any shares of class B common stock to any other holder of class B common stock or its affiliate;

• any transfer after the true-up distribution date of any share of class C common stock of any applicable series to any other holder of class C common stock;

• any transfer of any shares of any regional class of common stock, class B common stock or class C common stock to an affiliate of such holder;

• any transfer of shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreement;

• any transfer by Visa Europe of any shares of class C common stock to its members, stockholders or other holders of equity interest in Visa Europe at the time of such transfer, provided that such transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and is made to each transferee ratably in accordance with their respective entitlements to dividends or other distributions from Visa Europe, in accordance with the applicable constituent documents of Visa Europe;

• any transfer, after the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class B common stock or class C common stock by any person that is a group member (as defined in the second restated bylaws of Visa International) of Visa International to any person that is a stockholder, member or other equity holder of such group member, provided that such transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and is made to each transferee ratably in accordance with their respective entitlements to dividends or other distributions from such group member, in accordance with the applicable constituent documents of such group member;

• any transfer by a holder of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock to any person who succeeds to all or substantially all of the assets of such holder, whether by merger, consolidation, amalgamation, sale of substantially all assets or other similar transactions;

• any transfer by a holder of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock to any person who acquires from such holder all or substantially all of the Visa branded payments products portfolio of such holder; and

• any transfer, prior to the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class USA common stock by any holder thereof to any other holder thereof; provided that, contemporaneously with such transfer, a commensurate portion of the membership proportion, as calculated pursuant to the second restated Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation, is transferred from the transferor of such shares of class USA common stock to the transferee thereof, in accordance with the second restated Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation.

Our board of directors may approve exceptions to the limitation on transfers of our class C common stock, provided that such exception applies to all holders of class C common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if such

302

exception does not apply on an equal and ratable basis, such exception is also approved by at least 75% of our independent directors. Additionally, after the escrow termination date, our board of directors may approve exceptions to the limitations on transfers of our class B common stock, provided that such exception applies to all holders of class B common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if such exception does not apply on an equal and ratable basis, such exception is also approved by at least 75% of our independent directors.

Our board of directors may, by resolution adopted by a majority of the board of directors, extend the three year component of the transfer restriction periods with respect to any portion of the outstanding shares of our class B and class C common stock for a period of not more than one year after the date on which such period would otherwise terminate provided that:

• contemporaneously with any such extension with respect to any portion of such shares of class B common stock and class C common stock, our board of directors has approved one or more reductions to the transfer restriction period with respect to another portion of such shares of class B common stock and class C common stock, such that at all times the weighted average period of the transfer restriction period with respect to all outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock is not more than three years; and

• such extension applies to all holders of our class B common stock and class C common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if such extension does not apply to all holders of class B common stock and class C common stock equally on a ratable basis, such extension is also approved by at least 75% of our independent directors.

Limitations on a Change of Control

We summarize below several provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and the DGCL. These provisions could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us or deterring potential acquirers from making an offer to our stockholders. This could be the case even though a majority of our stockholders might benefit from such a change in control or offer. These descriptions are not complete and we refer you to the documents that we have filed as exhibits to this proxy statement-prospectus and to the DGCL.

Board of Directors. Our board of directors is divided into three classes serving staggered terms. The number of directors will be fixed by our board of directors, subject to the terms of our certificate of incorporation.

Prior to the consummation of an initial public offering of our class A common stock, our board of directors will consist of not less than 17 directors nor more than 18 directors, and will be elected as follows:

• holders of all regional classes of common stock will elect a number of independent directors constituting at least a majority of the board of directors, by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors;

• holders of shares of class USA common stock will elect two directors by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting voting as a separate class (we refer to these directors, or to their successors designated through the procedures described below, as our USA directors);

• holders of shares of our class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock, with such two series voting together as a separate class, will elect one director by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting voting together as a separate class (we refer to this director or our EU director);

• holders of shares of each of our class Canada common stock, class AP common stock, class LAC common stock and class CEMEA common stock will elect one director for each such class by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting voting each as

303

a separate class (We refer to these directors, or to their successors designated through the procedures described below, as our Canada director, our AP director, our LAC director and our CEMEA director, respectively, and together with our USA director, as our regional directors) and;

• holders of all regional classes of common stock will elect, by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders entitled to vote, voting as a single class, one director who, in order to qualify for election as such director, must hold the title of our Chief Executive Officer (we refer to this director as our executive director).

From the consummation of an initial public offering of our class A common stock until the third anniversary of the consummation of such offering, our board of directors will consist of 17 directors, and will be elected as follows:

• a number of independent directors equal to not less than 58% of the total number of directors comprising our full board of directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of our common stock present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors;

• two of our directors will be USA directors;

• one of our directors will be a Canada director;

• one of our directors will be an AP director;

• one of our directors will be a LAC director;

• one of our directors will be a CEMEA director; and

• our Chief Executive Officer will be the executive director.

Upon the closing of our restructuring, our board of directors will be divided into three classes, designated as class I, class II and class III. Each of our regional directors will be designated as a class I director, and will be elected for a term commencing on the closing of our restructuring and expiring on the first anniversary of the closing of our restructuring (except that the term of the EU director will automatically expire on the day immediately prior to the date of the closing of our initial public offering). Our executive director and one or more of our independent directors will be designated as class II directors, and will be elected for a term commencing on the closing of our restructuring and expiring on the second anniversary of the closing of our restructuring. One or more of our independent directors will be designated as class III directors and will be elected for a term commencing on the closing of our restructuring and expiring on the third anniversary of the closing of our restructuring.

From and after the third anniversary of the consummation of an initial public offering of our shares of class A common stock, the directors will be elected by the holders of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors. During such period, at least 58% of our board of directors will be comprised of independent directors.

Vacancies and newly created seats on our board of directors may be filled only by our board of directors. In the event of a vacancy resulting from the death, resignation, disqualification or removal of any regional director prior to the third anniversary of the consummation of our initial public offering, our board of directors will request that a representative sample of the holders of the applicable class or series of our common stock that was entitled to vote for the election of such regional director, as the board of directors may determine in its sole discretion, nominate an individual to fill such vacancy; provided, however, that such nominee must be an individual who is a current or former senior executive of a financial institution associated with the applicable class or series of common stock or which was entitled to vote for the election of such regional director. Our board of directors shall, at the next scheduled meeting of the board or any special meeting called for such

304

purpose, vote upon any nominee submitted by the such regional nominating committee. If such nominee is elected by a majority of our full board of directors present at a meeting at which there is a quorum, such nominee shall be elected as a member of our board of directors. If such nominee fails to be elected at such meeting, then our board of directors shall call a special meeting of our stockholders for the purpose of voting to elect a director to fill such vacancy. In addition, each of the parties to the restructuring agreement has agreed to take any actions necessary to cause each regional director, provided that he or she continues to satisfy the foregoing requirements, to be re-nominated for election to a second term as a director of Visa Inc., which second term will expire on the fourth anniversary of the closing of our restructuring. In addition, generally, a director may be removed, with or without cause, only by the affirmative vote of at least 80% in voting power of all the then outstanding shares of our stock entitled to vote for the election of directors voting together as a single class.

A candidate nominated to stand for election as one of our directors at any of our annual meetings (or any of our special meetings held for the purpose of electing directors in the first class of the three staggered classes of directors) held on or after January 1, 2008 and on or before December 31, 2008, will be required to meet the following qualifications: (i) such candidate must be a senior executive or former senior executive of a Visa member (or shall be one of our serving directors who has been nominated for re-election upon the expiration of his or her term); and (ii) such director must have been approved by the review committee (initially comprised of our seven regional directors) or, if the review committee has been disbanded because of the occurrence of the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock, by then-serving directors who would have comprised the review committee had the review committee not been so disbanded.

The staggered board of directors, the ability of different classes of stockholders to elect directors until the third anniversary of the consummation of the initial public offering of class A common stock, the inability of stockholders to fill vacancies or newly created seats on the board and the inability of stockholders to determine the number of directors make it more difficult to change the composition of our board of directors. These provisions promote a continuity of existing management.

Advance Notice Requirements. Our bylaws establish advance notice procedures with regard to stockholders’ proposals relating to the nomination of candidates for election as directors or other business to be brought before meetings of its stockholders. These procedures provide that notice of such stockholders’ proposals must be timely given in writing to our secretary prior to the meeting at which the action is to be taken. Generally, to be timely, notice must be received at our principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary date of the annual meeting for the preceding year. The notice must contain certain information specified in the bylaws.

Special Meetings of Stockholders. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be called by our board of directors, the chairman of the board (or, as the certificate of incorporation provides, any co-chairman, if any) or the chief executive officer.

15% Share Ownership Limitation. Unless otherwise approved in advance by our board of directors, no person may beneficially own more than 15% of:

• the aggregate outstanding shares or voting power of our class A common stock;

• the aggregate outstanding shares or voting power of any other class or series of common stock entitled at any time to vote for the election of directors; or

• the aggregate voting power of all of the then outstanding class A common stock and other common stock entitled at any time to vote for the election of directors, voting singly as a class.

5% Share Ownership Limitation. No Visa member or similar person may beneficially own more than 5% of the aggregate outstanding shares or voting power of class A common stock or other common stock entitled at any time to vote for the election of directors; provided, however, that: (i) no Visa member will be deemed in violation

305

of the foregoing limitation as a result of owning the number of shares of any applicable regional class of common stock as of immediately after the restructuring closing (or any other common stock into which such shares may subsequently be converted or any other shares issuable to such member pursuant to the transaction documents related to the restructuring); and (ii) no initial Visa Europe transferee will be deemed in violation of the foregoing limitation as a result of owning the number of shares of class C common stock immediately after the first transfer of any shares of class C common stock by Visa Europe to such initial Visa Europe transferee.

Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation. Our certificate of incorporation also requires the approval of not less than a majority of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of class A common stock, the class B common stock, each series of class C common stock and, prior to the true-up distribution date, each regional class of common stock, voting separately as a class or series, as applicable, to amend the voting rights of the common stock, if such amendment would adversely affect the voting rights of such class or series of common stock. These amendment requirements make it more difficult to alter the anti-takeover provisions of our certificate of incorporation. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws also authorize our board of directors to amend the bylaws at any time without stockholder action, except that any amendment by our board of directors of any provision of the bylaws that was adopted by our stockholders will not become effective earlier than 365 days after the date on which the stockholders adopted such provision.

Preferred Stock. Since our board of directors may issue shares of preferred stock and set the voting powers, designations, preferences and other rights related to that preferred stock, any designation of preferred stock and issuance of shares of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change of control.

Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute. Visa Inc. will, upon the consummation of the initial public offering, become subject to Section 203 of the DGCL. Subject to specific exceptions, Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the time the person became an interested stockholder, unless:

• the business combination, or the transaction in which the stockholder became an interested stockholder, is approved by Visa Inc.’s board of directors prior to the time the interested stockholder attained that status;

• upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding those shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers and by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or

• at or after the time a person became an interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by Visa Inc.’s board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.

“Business combinations” include mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to various exceptions, in general an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with his or her affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years did own, 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock.

306

COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF MEMBERS PRIOR TO AND AFTER THE RESTRUCTURING

Visa U.S.A. and Visa International are incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware and Visa Canada is incorporated under the laws of Ontario, Canada. Accordingly, the rights of the members of Visa U.S.A. and Visa International are currently governed by certificates of incorporation, bylaws and the operating regulations of Visa U.S.A. and Visa International, respectively, and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or the DGCL. The rights of the members of Visa Canada are governed by the letters patent, bylaws and operating regulations of Visa Canada and the laws of Ontario, Canada. As a result of the restructuring, the members of Visa U.S.A., the members of Visa International (other than Visa Canada), and the members of Visa Canada will become stockholders of Visa Inc. Therefore, following the restructuring, the rights of members of Visa U.S.A. will be governed, regarding their ownership of our common stock, by our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and by the DGCL, and regarding their Visa U.S.A. membership interests, by the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and by the operating regulations of Visa U.S.A. and by the DGCL. Following the restructuring, the rights of members of Visa International will be governed, regarding their ownership of our common stock, by our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and by the DGCL, and regarding their Visa International membership interests, by the amended and restated certificate of incorporation, bylaws and operating regulations of Visa International, and by the DGCL. Following the restructuring, the rights of former members of Visa Canada will be governed, regarding their ownership of our common stock, by the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Visa Inc. and by the DGCL, and regarding their commercial and other rights and obligations regarding participation in the Visa payments system, by the Canadian services agreement and related agreements with Visa Canada.

Your rights as a member of Visa U.S.A. or Visa International after the restructuring will represent the commercial and other rights to participate in the Visa U.S.A. or Visa International payments system.

We summarize below the principal differences between your existing rights as a member of Visa U.S.A., Visa International or Visa Canada, and the rights you will have as a stockholder of Visa Inc. following the restructuring. The following comparison is not intended to provide a comprehensive summary of Delaware or Ontario law or of each company’s governing documents. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the certificates of incorporation/letters patent (as applicable) and bylaws of Visa Inc., Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada, each of which will be adopted or revised, as the case may be, upon the completion of the restructuring.

Visa U.S.A.

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Authorized Membership Interests/Capital	The certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Visa U.S.A. do not set a limit for the number of membership interests in any class.	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. authorizes the issuance of up to 2,004,199,484,030 shares, which will include, among other classes described in “Description of Capital Stock of Visa Inc.—Capitalization,” (i) 622,245,209 shares of class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; and (ii) 622,245,209 shares of class USA common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

307

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Dividends	The board of directors can decide to pay dividends to members in cash or in property. Dividends shall only be paid to voting members that have paid Visa U.S.A. service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron Card accounts. The amount of dividends to be paid to any member entitled to receive such dividends shall represent an amount equal to the product of (x) the total amount to be distributed, multiplied by (y) such voting member’s membership proportion. Membership proportion means, for each Visa U.S.A. voting member, an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing: (A) the total of all service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron Card accounts paid by such Visa U.S.A. voting member (or in the case of an associate member sponsored by a debit interchange member, paid on its behalf by its sponsoring debit interchange member) to Visa U.S.A. from the date of the Visa U.S.A. voting member’s acceptance as a member through January 15, 2006; by (B) the total of all service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron Card accounts paid to Visa U.S.A. by all Visa U.S.A. voting members (or in the case of an associate member sponsored by a debit interchange member, paid on its behalf by its sponsoring debit interchange member) from May 26, 1970 through January 15, 2006. Generally, members that were not members of Visa U.S.A. whose applications were accepted on or before February 10, 1992 or who are not affiliates, as defined in the Federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, of a member that had its application accepted by Visa U.S.A. on or before February 10, 1992 shall be entitled to dividends declared by Visa U.S.A. only in respect of debit card sales volume.	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. states that the board of directors may at its discretion decide to declare and pay dividends on the common stock out of the available assets of Visa Inc. that are by law available therefor.

308

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
	Debit interchange members, credit participant members, debit participant members and cash disbursement participant members have no right to receive dividends. Associate members have no right to receive dividends unless sponsored by a debit interchange member.	All holders of outstanding shares of class A common stock, class B common stock, class C common stock or, prior to the true-up distribution date, holders of outstanding shares of any regional class of common stock, as applicable, are entitled to participate ratably, on an as converted basis, in any dividend or distribution paid on the common stock, and no dividend or distribution may be declared or paid on any class or series of common stock unless an equivalent dividend is contemporaneously declared and paid on each other class and series of common stock.
Liquidity and Transferability	Members of Visa U.S.A. may not transfer their memberships.	Until (x) in the case of the class USA common stock and the class B common stock, the later of the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated and the escrow termination date and (y) in the case of any regional class of common stock other than the class USA common stock and any series of class C common stock, the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, no shares of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock may be transferred, except for: •     any transfer from Visa Inc. to the initial holders of any regional class of common stock, class B common stock or class C common stock; •     any transfer upon the redemption of the shares of class B common stock or class C common stock; •     any transfer by Visa Inc. to any person or entity or by the holders thereof to Visa Inc.; •     any transfer, after the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class B common stock to any other holder of class B common stock or any affiliate thereof and any transfer of any shares of class C common stock of any

309

Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

applicable series thereof to any other holder of class C common stock of the same series thereof or to any affiliate thereof; •     any transfer of any shares of any regional class of common stock, class B common stock or class C common stock to an affiliate of such holder; •     any transfer of any shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreement; •     any transfer by Visa Europe of any shares of class C common stock to its members, stockholders or other holders of equity interest in Visa Europe at the time of such transfer; provided that such transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and is made to each such initial Visa Europe transferee ratably in accordance with their respective entitlements to dividends or other distributions from Visa Europe; •     any transfer, after the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class B common stock or class C common stock by any person that is a group member of Visa International to any person that is a stockholder, member, or other equity holder of such group member; provided that such transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and is made to each such initial group member transferee ratably in accordance with their respective entitlements to dividends or other distributions from such group member; •     any transfer by a holder of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock to a

310

Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

successor of all or substantially all of the assets of such holder, or to an affiliate of such successor; •     any transfer by a holder of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock to any person who acquires from such holder all or substantially all of the Visa branded payments products portfolio of such holder; and •     any transfer, prior to the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class USA common stock by any holder thereof to any other holder thereof; provided that, contemporaneously with such transfer, a commensurate portion of the membership proportion (as calculated pursuant to the Second Restated Visa U.S.A. Certificate of Incorporation) is transferred from the transferor of such shares of class USA common stock to the transferee thereof, in accordance with the second restated Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation. The board of directors of Visa Inc. may approve one or more exceptions to the foregoing transfer restrictions in the case of any proposed transfer by a holder of class C common stock; provided that such exception applies to all holders of class C common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if it does not apply ratably, is also approved by at least 75% of Visa Inc.’s independent directors. At any time after the escrow termination date, the board of directors of Visa Inc. may approve one or more exceptions to the foregoing transfer restrictions in the case of any proposed transfer by a holder of class B common stock; provided that such exception applies to all holders of class B common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if it does not apply ratably, is also approved by at least 75% of Visa Inc.’s independent directors.

311

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		The board of directors of Visa Inc. may, by resolution adopted by a majority of the board of directors of Visa Inc., extend the three year component of the lock-up periods described above with respect to any portion of the outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock for a period of not more than one year after the date on which such period would otherwise terminate (not including, in the case of class B common stock, any period by which such date of termination is exceeded by the escrow termination date); provided that (i) contemporaneously with any such extension of the lock-up period, the board of directors of Visa Inc. has approved one or more reductions to the lock-up period with respect to another portion of such shares of class B common stock and class C common stock, such that at all times the weighted average period of the lock-up period with respect to all outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock is not more than three years; and (ii) such extension of the lock-up period applies to all holders of class B common stock and class C common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if it does not apply ratably is also approved by at least 75% of Visa Inc.’s independent directors.
Voting Rights	Acquirer members, administrative members, cheque issuer members, group members, associate members sponsored by a debit interchange member and principal members of Visa U.S.A. in existence as of the relevant date of determination are voting members if such member had qualifying sales volume during the twelve months preceding March 31, 2007 and meets any of the following criteria: •      had its application accepted by Visa U.S.A. on or before February 10, 1992; •      is an affiliate, as defined in the Federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, of a member that had its application accepted by Visa U.S.A. on or before February 10, 1992; or	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. provides that prior to the true-up distribution date: •      each holder of class USA common stock will have the right, with respect to each share of class USA common stock owned of record by such holder, to cast a number of votes equal to the number of shares of class B common stock into which each share of class USA common stock would be converted, based on the class USA conversion rate in effect on the record date with respect to such vote; and •      each share of class B common stock will have no voting rights, except as required by law.

312

Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
•     had debit card sales volume during the twelve months preceding March 31, 2007. The Visa U.S.A. voting members are entitled to an aggregate of 100 million votes. Each Visa U.S.A. voting member is entitled to the number of votes equal to 100 million multiplied by the Visa U.S.A. voting member’s membership proportion. Membership proportion means, for each Visa U.S.A. voting member, an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing: (A) the total of all service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron Card accounts paid by such Visa U.S.A. voting member (or in the case of an associate member sponsored by a debit interchange member, paid on its behalf by its sponsoring debit interchange member) to Visa U.S.A. from the date of the Visa U.S.A. voting member’s acceptance as a member through January 15, 2006; by (B) the total of all service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron Card accounts paid to Visa U.S.A. by all Visa U.S.A. voting members (or in the case of an associate member sponsored by a debit interchange member, paid on its behalf by its sponsoring debit interchange member) from May 26, 1970 through January 15, 2006.
	During the period from and after the true-up distribution date until prior to the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, each holder of class B common stock will have the right, with respect to each share of class B common stock owned of record by such holder, to cast one vote for each share of class A common stock into which each share of class B common stock would be converted, based on the applicable conversion rate in effect on the record date with respect to such vote. From and after the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, each holder of shares of class B common stock

313

Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

will have no voting power; provided, however, that, in addition to any other vote required by law, for so long as any shares of class B common stock or class C common stock remain issued and outstanding: •     the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the class B common stock and class C (series I) common stock (and, prior to the conversion thereof into shares of class C (series I) common stock, the class C (series III) common stock and the class C (series IV) common stock), voting together as a single class (in which vote the class A common stock and class C (series II) common stock shall not participate) separate from all other classes or series of capital stock of Visa Inc., on an as converted basis, shall be required for the approval of any consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction in which shares of class A common stock are exchanged for, converted into or changed into other stock or securities, or the right to receive cash or other property, unless the shares of class B common stock and class C common stock of all series thereof shall be exchanged for or changed into the same per share amount of stock, securities, cash or any other property, as the case may be, for which or in which each share of class A common stock is exchanged, converted or changed; and •     the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the common stock of all classes and series other than the class EU (series II) common stock or class C (series II) common stock, as applicable, voting together as a single class

314

Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

(in which vote the class EU (series II) common stock and class C (series II) common stock shall not participate) separate from all other classes or series of capital stock of Visa Inc., shall be required to authorize Visa Inc. to exit its core payments business (i.e., to no longer operate a consumer debit/credit payments business). With respect to each matter upon which holders of class B common stock are entitled to vote pursuant to applicable law or during the periods from and after the true-up distribution date until and after the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, each such holder will have the right, with respect to each share of class B common stock owned of record by such holder, to a number of votes equal to the aggregate number of shares of class A common stock into which each share of class B common stock owned by such holder would be converted, assuming the conversion, on the record date for such vote, of all outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock into class A common stock, based on the applicable conversion rate in effect on such record date. To the fullest extent permitted by law, holders of common stock will have no voting power with respect to, and will not be entitled to vote on, any amendment to the amended and restated Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of preferred stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either separately or together with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote thereon pursuant to the amended and restated Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation or pursuant to the DGCL.

315

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Vote on Extraordinary Transactions/ Supermajority Voting Provisions	The affirmative vote of voting members possessing two-thirds of the total votes of the voting members at the time outstanding shall be required for the approval of any merger or consolidation of Visa U.S.A., any dissolution of Visa U.S.A. or any sale of all or substantially all of Visa U.S.A.’s assets.	Delaware law requires that a merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets or a dissolution must be approved by an affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the members having the right to vote for the election of directors.
Amendments of Governing Documents	The voting members of the board of directors and the voting members of Visa U.S.A. are expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal the bylaws of Visa U.S.A., except as may be otherwise provided in Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation; provided, that: (a) the approval of two-thirds of the outstanding votes of Visa U.S.A.’s voting members shall be necessary for Visa U.S.A.’s voting members to amend the bylaws; (b) the approval of 75% of the voting members of the board of directors shall be necessary for the board of directors to amend bylaw sections regarding general obligations of membership, categories of membership, proportional representation, quorum; voting; and approval of corporate actions; and (c) the approval of two-thirds of the outstanding votes of Visa U.S.A.’s voting members will be required to amend sections of the bylaws regarding eligibility for membership and powers of the board of directors.	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. provides that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, amend, alter, change, add to or repeal the Visa Inc. bylaws without the assent or vote of the stockholders in any manner not inconsistent with the laws of the State of Delaware or its certificate of incorporation. However, any amendment, alteration, change or repeal by the board of directors of any provision of the bylaws that was adopted by the stockholders of Visa Inc. will not be effective earlier than the date that is 365 days after the date on which such provision of the bylaws was adopted by the stockholders of Visa Inc. In addition to any votes required by applicable law, without the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of each of the class A common stock, the class B common stock, each series of class C common stock and, prior to the true-up distribution date, each regional class of common stock, voting separately as a class or series (and together with no other class or series), as applicable: •      no provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. concerning voting rights of holders of the common stock, voting on an as converted basis, redemption of common stock, and, until the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, composition of the board of directors, vacancies thereon

316

Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

and newly-created directorships may be amended, altered, repealed, or otherwise modified; and •     no provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. inconsistent with any such provisions may be adopted, whether by means of formal amendment thereto or by means of any merger, consolidation, amalgamation, other business combination or otherwise; if such amendment, alteration, repeal or other modification would adversely affect the powers, preferences or special rights of such class or series of common stock. Without the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of the outstanding shares of each of the class A common stock, the class B common stock, each series of class C common stock and, prior to the true-up distribution date, each regional class of common stock, each voting together as a single class of common stock; •     no provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. concerning limitations on beneficial ownership of class A common stock, sales of loss shares or limitations on our initial public offering may be amended, altered, repealed or otherwise modified; and •     no provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. inconsistent with any such provisions may be adopted, whether by means of formal amendment thereto or by means of any merger, consolidation, amalgamation, other business combination or otherwise. Neither the terms of the class B common stock nor the terms of the class C common stock may be amended without, in either such case, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the class B common stock, voting separately (and together with no other class or series) as a class and the affirmative

317

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		votes of a majority of the class C (series I) common stock, class C (series III) common stock and class C (series IV) common stock voting separately (and together with no other class or series) as a class. Without limiting the foregoing, any amendment of any provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. that requires the treatment of holders of class B common stock and class C common stock ratably on an as converted basis shall not be effective unless such amendment is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of each adversely affected class of common stock. No amendment of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. that would adversely and disproportionately affect the rights or privileges of any regional class of common stock in relation to any other regional class of common stock will be effective unless such amendment is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of such adversely affected regional class of common stock. The amended and restated bylaws of Visa Inc. provide that the board of directors of Visa Inc. is expressly authorized to make, adopt, amend, supplement and repeal such bylaws without assent or vote of the stockholders, in any manner not inconsistent with the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. or the DGCL. The Visa Inc. stockholders also have the power to adopt, amend, supplement or repeal the amended and restated bylaws of Visa Inc.
Annual Meetings	The bylaws of Visa U.S.A. provide for annual meetings to be held on the first Tuesday of October (if a legal holiday, then on the next business day) or at such date and place as the board of directors designates.	The amended and restated bylaws of Visa Inc. provide that annual meetings may be held at any date and time designated by the board of directors and stated in the notice of the meeting. Meetings of stockholders will be held at any place

318

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		designated by the board of directors, or, in the absence of any such designation, at the corporate headquarters of Visa Inc.
Appraisal Rights	Delaware law provides for appraisal rights for members of Visa U.S.A. in the case of certain mergers or other consolidations involving Visa U.S.A.	Delaware law provides for appraisal rights for stockholders of Visa Inc. in the case of mergers, consolidations and certain other transactions involving Visa Inc.
Member Indemnity Obligation	Under the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Visa U.S.A. in effect prior to the restructuring and the various Visa U.S.A. membership agreements, each Visa U.S.A. member is liable for and must indemnify and hold harmless Visa U.S.A. for losses in connection with the member’s participation in Visa U.S.A.’s payment services, or any other products or services obtained by the member from or through Visa U.S.A. or in connection with Visa U.S.A.’s performance of any services for the member.	As a Delaware stock corporation, Visa Inc. will be a limited liability entity. In connection with the closing of the restructuring the bylaws of Visa U.S.A. will be amended to provide that, from and after the closing of the restructuring, each member of Visa U.S.A.’s obligation to indemnify Visa U.S.A. will be limited to: (i) losses arising out of the actions or omissions of such member and its sponsored members of Visa U.S.A.; and (ii) losses arising out of the covered litigation. In addition, the restructuring agreement provides that, effective upon the closing of our restructuring, Visa Inc., Visa International and Visa U.S.A. will release, among others, each current and former member of Visa U.S.A. from any liabilities that could be asserted against such persons in respect of their membership in Visa U.S.A., subject only to such obligations as members of Visa U.S.A. may have with respect to any covered litigation by reason of any provisions of the transaction documents in connection with our restructuring, including the certificate of incorporation or by laws of Visa U.S.A.
Liquidation Rights	In the event of dissolution of Visa U.S.A., voting members that have paid to Visa U.S.A. service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron card accounts are entitled to distribution of remaining assets after satisfaction of all liabilities. The amount of such assets to be paid to any member entitled to such distribution shall represent an amount equal to the product of (x) the total amount to be distributed multiplied by (y) such member’s membership proportion on the date of such	Upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Visa Inc., holders of common stock of Visa Inc. are entitled to share ratably on an as converted basis in the net assets available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of debts and other liabilities, subject to the prior rights of any issued preferred shares.

319

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
	distribution. Membership proportion means, for each Visa U.S.A. voting member, an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing: (A) the total of all service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron Card accounts paid by such Visa U.S.A. voting member (or in the case of an associate member sponsored by a debit interchange member, paid on its behalf by its sponsoring debit interchange member) to Visa U.S.A. from the date of the Visa U.S.A. voting member’s acceptance as a member through January 15, 2006; by (B) the total of all service fees based on sales volume, check guarantee accounts, Gold Card accounts, and/or Electron Card accounts paid to Visa U.S.A. by all Visa U.S.A. voting members (or in the case of an associate member sponsored by a debit interchange member, paid on its behalf by its sponsoring debit interchange member) from May 26, 1970 through January 15, 2006. Generally, members that were not members of Visa U.S.A. whose applications were accepted on or before February 10, 1992 or who were not affiliates, as defined in the Federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, of a member that had its application accepted by Visa U.S.A. on or before February 10, 1992 shall be entitled to receive distribution of assets only with respect to debit card sales volume.
Election of Directors	Under the certificate of incorporation Visa U.S.A. in effect prior to the restructuring, the board of directors of Visa U.S.A. may be comprised of no more than 17 directors. The number of directors constituting the board will be fixed from time to time by the board of directors. The board of directors of Visa U.S.A. is comprised of independent directors, member directors and ex-officio directors. Independent and member directors are voting members of the board of directors. There may be no more than two ex-officio directors, neither of whom are voting directors.	The board of directors of Visa Inc. is divided into three classes serving staggered terms. The number of directors will be fixed from time to time by a majority vote of the board of directors of Visa Inc., subject to applicable provisions of the amended and restated Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation. Prior to the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will consist of not less than 17 nor more than 18 directors, elected as follows:

320

Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

Independent directors and member directors are divided into two classes serving staggered terms. The bylaws of Visa U.S.A. set forth qualifications that must be met by candidates for each of the foregoing types of director.

•     holders of all regional classes of common stock will elect independent directors comprising at least a majority of the directors of the board of directors by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors voting as a single class; •     holders of shares of class USA common stock will elect two directors by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting voting as a separate class; •     holders of shares of each of class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock, voting together as a single class, class Canada common stock, class AP common stock, class LAC common stock and class CEMEA common stock will each elect one director for each such class by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of each such class present or represented by proxy at the meeting, in each case voting as a separate class; and •     holders of all regional classes of common stock will elect, by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders entitled to vote, voting as a single class, one director, who, in order to qualify for election as such director, must hold the title of chief executive officer of Visa Inc. The term of the director elected by holders of shares of our class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock, with such two series voting together, will expire on the date immediately prior to the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated.

321

Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

From the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated until the third anniversary of such date, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will consist of 17 directors, elected as follows: •     holders of outstanding shares of common stock of all classes will elect a number of independent directors equal to not less than 58% of the total number of directors comprising the full board of directors of Visa Inc. by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors; •     holders of shares of class USA common stock will elect two directors by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting voting as a separate class; •     holders of shares of each class Canada common stock, class AP common stock, class LAC common stock and class CEMEA common stock will elect one director for each such class by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of each such class present or represented by proxy at the meeting, in each case voting as a separate class; and •     holders of all classes and series of common stock entitled to vote, voting as a single class, will elect, by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders, one director, who, in order to qualify for election as such director, must hold the title of chief executive officer of Visa Inc. From and after the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public

322

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will consist of the number of directors as shall from time to time be fixed by resolution of a majority of the board of directors; provided that at least 58% of the board of directors of Visa Inc. will be comprised of independent directors. Directors will be elected by the holders of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors.
Governance Provisions	Visa U.S.A. is managed by or under the direction of the board of directors.	Visa Inc. is managed by or under the direction of the members of the board of directors.
Taxation	Visa U.S.A. is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations filing a U.S. consolidated federal income tax return. The group’s taxable income is taxed at regular corporate income tax rates. Members may be subject to taxation on any dividends they receive depending upon the applicable tax laws of their respective taxing jurisdictions.	Visa Inc. is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations filing a U.S. consolidated federal income tax return. The group’s taxable income is taxed at regular corporate income tax rates. Stockholders may be subject to taxation on any dividends they receive depending upon the applicable tax laws of their respective taxing jurisdictions.
Limited Liability	The board of directors has no power to levy assessments upon the members. See, however, “Member Indemnity Obligation” above.	Stockholders of Visa Inc. are not subject to personal liability for the debts, obligations or liabilities of Visa Inc. In addition, the common stock of Visa Inc. is nonassessable. In addition, see “Member Indemnity Obligation” above.
Indemnification	Delaware law permits indemnification of officers and directors against all expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred in any action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the company. It is also permitted to advance to the officers and directors all related expenses, subject to reimbursement if it is determined subsequently that indemnification is not permitted. Pursuant to the amended certificate of incorporation of Visa U.S.A., Visa U.S.A. will indemnify all officers and directors to the fullest extent	Regarding indemnification of officers and directors, no change, except that Visa Inc. is not obligated to indemnify any director or officer in connection with a proceeding initiated by such person unless: (i) such proceeding was authorized or consented to by the board of directors; or (ii) such director or officer has been successful on the merits in any such proceeding. Regarding indemnification of employees and agents, the certificate of

323

Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

permitted by Delaware law, except that, other than proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, Visa U.S.A. is not obligated to indemnify any director or officer in connection with a proceeding initiated by such person unless such proceeding was authorized in advance by the board of directors. Under the amended certificate of incorporation of Visa U.S.A., Visa U.S.A. may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the board of directors of Visa U.S.A., provide rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses to employees and agents of Visa U.S.A. similar to those conferred to directors and officers of Visa U.S.A. Pursuant to the bylaws of Visa U.S.A., Visa U.S.A. may indemnify and advance expenses to any person who is involved in any proceeding by reason of the fact that such person is or was an employee of Visa U.S.A. or, while an employee or agent of Visa U.S.A., is or was serving at the request of Visa U.S.A. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another organization. Visa U.S.A. is not obligated to indemnify any employee or agent in connection with a proceeding initiated by such person unless such proceeding was authorized in advance by the board of directors. Pursuant to the bylaws of Visa U.S.A., the board of directors of Visa U.S.A. may, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, authorize an officer to purchase and maintain at Visa U.S.A.’s expense insurance: (i) to indemnify Visa U.S.A. for any obligation which it incurs as a result of the indemnification of directors, officers and employees; and (ii) to indemnify and insure directors, officers and employees against liability in instances in which they may not otherwise be indemnified by Visa U.S.A.

incorporation of Visa Inc. contains a provision similar to that in the amended certificate of incorporation of Visa U.S.A. To the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL or any other applicable law, Visa Inc. may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of Visa Inc., or is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of Visa Inc. serving at the request of Visa Inc. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another organization against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person’s status as such, whether or not Visa Inc. would have the power or the obligation to indemnify such person against such liability.

324

	Visa U.S.A. Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Redemption	The bylaws of Visa U.S.A. do not provide for redemption rights but do provide for involuntary termination of membership under certain circumstances.	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. provides that Visa Inc. will use a portion of the net proceeds received by Visa Inc. from the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock, to redeem shares of class B common stock and class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) for a per share amount equal to the price per share of class A common stock received by Visa Inc. in the initial public offering, net of any underwriting discounts and commissions.
Other Rights or Limitations	Visa U.S.A. members are not entitled to any additional rights in connection with their membership interests.	15% Share Ownership Limitation. Unless otherwise approved by Visa Inc.’s board of directors, no person or entity may beneficially own: (i) more than 15% of the outstanding shares or voting power of class A common stock or the outstanding shares of any class of other voting stock; or (ii) shares of class A common stock and other voting stock representing more than 15% of the aggregate voting power of all the outstanding shares of stock of Visa Inc. entitled to vote on an election of directors, voting together as a single class. 5% Share Ownership Limitation. No Visa member or similar person may beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares or voting power of class A common stock or other common stock entitled at any time to vote for the election of directors, provided, however, that no Visa member will be deemed in violation of the foregoing limitation as a result of owning the number of shares of any applicable regional class of common stock as of immediately after the restructuring closing (or any other common stock into which such shares may subsequently be converted or any other shares issuable to such member pursuant to the transaction documents).

325

Visa International

	Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Authorized Membership Interests/Capital	The certificate of incorporation and the bylaws of Visa International do not set a limit for the number of membership interests in any class.	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. authorizes the issuance of up to 2,004,199,484,030 shares, which will include, among other classes described in “Description of Capital Stock of Visa Inc.—Capitalization:” (i) 622,245,209 shares of class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, (ii) 917,165,602 shares of class C common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; (iii) 622,245,209 shares of class USA common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, (iv) 103,582,801 shares of class EU common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (v) 25,000,000 shares of class Canada common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, (vi) 130,000,000 shares of class AP common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; (vii) 90,000,000 shares of class LAC common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; and (viii) 42,000,000 shares of class CEMEA common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
Dividends	The board of directors may pay dividends to members in cash or in property. Dividends shall be payable only to those members that have paid to the corporation service fees based on sales volume, Plus Program Cards issued, and/or capital fees, ratably in accordance with their payment of such fees to Visa International.	The board of directors may at its discretion decide to declare and pay dividends on Visa Inc. common stock out of the available assets of Visa Inc. that are by law available therefor. All holders of outstanding shares of class A common stock, class B common stock, class C common stock or, prior to the true-up distribution date, holders of outstanding shares of any regional class of common stock, as applicable, are entitled to participate ratably, on an as converted basis, in any dividend or distribution paid on the common stock, and no dividend or distribution may be declared or paid on any class or series of common stock unless an equivalent dividend is contemporaneously declared and paid on each other class and series of common stock.
Liquidity and Transferability	Members of Visa International may not transfer their membership interests, except as provided in the bylaws or with an affirmative vote of three-quarters of the	Until: (x) in the case of the class USA common stock and the class B common stock, the later of the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering

326

Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

directors in attendance at any meeting of the board of directors at which a quorum is present.

of shares of class A common stock is consummated and the escrow termination date; and (y) in the case of the any regional class of common stock other than the class USA common stock and any series of class C common stock, the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, no shares of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock may be transferred, except for: •     any transfer from Visa Inc. to the initial holders of any regional class of common stock, class B common stock or class C common stock; •     any transfer upon the redemption of the shares of class B common stock or class C common stock; •     any transfer by Visa Inc. to any person or entity or by the holders thereof to Visa Inc.; •     any transfer, after the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class B common stock to any other holder of class B common stock or any affiliate thereof and any transfer of any shares of class C common stock of any applicable series thereof to any other holder of class C common stock of the same series thereof or to any affiliate thereof; •     any transfer of any shares of any regional class of common stock, class B common stock or class C common stock to an affiliate of such holder; •     any transfer of any shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreement; •     any transfer by Visa Europe of any shares of class C common stock to its members, stockholders or other holders of

327

Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

equity interest in Visa Europe at the time of such transfer; provided that such transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and is made to each such initial Visa Europe transferee ratably in accordance with their respective entitlements to dividends or other distributions from Visa Europe; •     any transfer, after the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class B common stock or class C common stock by any person that is a group member of Visa International to any person that is a stockholder, member, or other equity holder of such group member; provided that such transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and is made to each such initial group member transferee ratably in accordance with their respective entitlements to dividends or other distributions from such group member; •     any transfer by a holder of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock to a successor of all or substantially all of the assets of such holder, or to an affiliate of such successor; •     any transfer by a holder of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock to any person who acquires from such holder all or substantially all of the Visa branded payments products portfolio of such holder; and •     any transfer, prior to the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class USA common stock by any holder thereof to any other holder thereof; provided that, contemporaneously with such

328

Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

transfer, a commensurate portion of the membership proportion (as calculated pursuant to the second restated Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation) is transferred from the transferor of such shares of class USA common stock to the transferee thereof, in accordance with the second restated Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation. The board of directors of Visa Inc. may approve one or more exceptions to the foregoing transfer restrictions in the case of any proposed transfer by a holder of class C common stock; provided that suchexception applies to all holders of class C common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if it does not apply ratably, is also approved by at least 75% of Visa Inc.’s independent directors. At any time after the escrow termination date, the board of directors of Visa Inc. may approve one or more exceptions to the foregoing transfer restrictions in the case of any proposed transfer by a holder of class B common stock; provided that such exception applies to all holders of class B common stock equally on a ratable basis or is also approved by at least 75% of Visa Inc.’s independent directors. The board of directors of Visa Inc. may, by resolution adopted by a majority of the board of directors of Visa Inc., extend the three year component of the lock-up periods described above with respect to any portion of the outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock for a period of not more than one year after the date on which such period would otherwise terminate (not including, in the case of class B common stock, any period by which such date of termination is exceeded by the escrow termination date); provided that: (i) contemporaneously with any such

329

	Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		extension of the lock-up period, the board of directors of Visa Inc. has approved one or more reductions to the lock-up period with respect to another portion of such shares of class B common stock and class C common stock, such that at all times the weighted average period of the lock-up period with respect to all outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock is not more than three years; and (ii) such extension of the lock-up period applies to all holders of class B common stock and class C common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if it does not apply ratably, is also approved by at least 75% of Visa Inc.’s independent directors.
Voting Rights	As to all matters, voting by members from April 1 of any year to March 31 of the following year is based upon the operating certificates covering the calendar year period preceding such April 1, provided such certificates have been filed properly in accordance the bylaws of Visa International. Each Principal and Visa Cash Program Participant is entitled to one vote for each US$1,000, or fraction thereof, of Card sales volume and Visa Cash sales volume; each Plus Issuer, effective with the elections of Directors to serve as of June 1, 1990, is entitled to one vote for every 25 Plus Program Cards (except Cards which bear both the VISA and Plus Program marks) in existence at the close of the calendar year period referred to in Section 4.03(a) of the bylaws; each Cheque Issuer shall be entitled to one vote for each US$1,000, or fraction thereof, of Cheque sales volume, or its equivalent in such member’s currency, as set forth in its operating certificates, provided that no certificate found inaccurate by the Board of Directors pursuant to Section 3.07 of the bylaws shall be the basis of computing or continuing to exercise voting rights until revised or accepted as accurate by the Board of Directors, and provided that such member’s right to vote has not been suspended pursuant to Section 10.02 of the	Members of Visa International will no longer have voting rights as members of Visa International. Prior to the true-up distribution date, •     each holder of any share of any regional class of common stock (other than the class EU (series II) common stock, which in general is not entitled to any voting rights) is entitled to a number of rates equal to the number of shares of class C common stock (or, in the case of the class USA common stock, class B common stock) into which such share is convertible, based on the applicable conversion rate in effect. During the period from and after the true-up distribution date and prior to the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated: •     each holder of shares of class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) and class B common stock will have the right, with respect to each share of class C common stock (other than class C (series II)

330

Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

bylaws. Merchant Acquirers are not allocated any votes and are not entitled to any voting rights.

common stock) or class B common stock owned of record by such holder, to cast one vote for each share of class A common stock into which each share of class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) or class B common stock would be converted, based on the applicable conversion rate in effect on the record date with respect to such vote; and •     each holder of shares of class C (series II) common stock will have no right to vote on any matters on which stockholders generally are entitled to vote; provided, however, that a separate class vote of the holders of class C (series II) common stock will be required to approve any amendment to the amended and restated Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation that adversely affects the powers, preferences or special rights of the class C (series II) common stock, but does not so affect the powers, preferences or special rights of any other class or series of common stock of Visa Inc. From and after the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, each holder of shares of class B common stock or class C common stock will have no voting power; provided, however, that, in addition to any other vote required by law, for so long as any shares of class B common stock or class C common stock remain issued and outstanding: •     the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the class B common stock and class C (series I) common stock (and, prior to the conversion thereof into shares of class C (series I) common stock, the

331

Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

class C (series III) common stock and the class C (series IV) common stock), voting together as a single class (in which vote the class A common stock and class C (series II) common stock will not participate) separate from all other classes or series of capital stock of Visa Inc., on an “as converted basis,” will be required for the approval of any consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction in which shares of class A common stock are exchanged for, converted into or changed into other stock or securities, or the right to receive cash or other property, unless the shares of class B common stock and class C common stock of all series thereof shall be exchanged for or changed into the same per share amount of stock, securities, cash or any other property, as the case may be, for which or in which each share of class A common stock is exchanged, converted or changed; and •     the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the common stock of all classes and series other than the class EU (series II) common stock or class C (series II) common stock, as applicable, voting together as a single class (in which vote the class EU (series II) common stock and class C (series II) common stock shall not participate) separate from all other classes or series of capital stock of Visa Inc., will be required to authorize Visa Inc. to exit its core payments business (i.e., to no longer operate a consumer debit/credit payments business).

332

	Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		With respect to each matter upon which holders of class C common stock are entitled to vote pursuant to applicable law or during the periods from and after the true-up distribution date until and after the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, each such holder will have the right, with respect to each share of class C common stock (other than the class C (series II) common stock) owned of record by such holder, to a number of votes equal to the aggregate number of shares of class A common stock into which each share of class C common stock (other than the class C (series II) common stock) owned by such holder would be converted, assuming the conversion, on the record date for such vote, of all outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock into class A common stock, based on the applicable conversion rate in effect on such record date.
Vote on Extraordinary Transactions/ Supermajority Voting Provisions	Delaware Law requires that a merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets or a dissolution must be approved by an affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the members having the right to vote for the election of directors.	Delaware Law requires that a merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets, or a dissolution must be approved by the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding voting power of the corporation entitled to vote thereon.
Amendments of Governing Documents	The bylaws of Visa International may be amended by the affirmative vote of a majority of members entitled to vote possessing at least 90% of the total votes outstanding, except that certain provisions of the amendments section, and certain provisions relating to number and qualification of directors, election or appointment of directors, powers of board of directors, adoption or amendment of bylaws by directors, and initial board of directors may be amended, altered, or repealed only by the affirmative vote of at least 90% of the members entitled to vote possessing at least 90% of the total votes outstanding; certain provisions of the amendments provisions and provisions	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. provides that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, amend, alter, change, add to or repeal the Visa Inc. bylaws without the assent or vote of the stockholders in any manner not inconsistent with the laws of the State of Delaware or its certificate of incorporation; provided, that any amendment, alteration, change or repeal by the board of directors of any provision of the bylaws that was adopted by the stockholders of Visa Inc. will not be effective earlier than the date that is 365 days after the date on which such provision of the bylaws was adopted by the stockholders of Visa Inc.

333

Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

with respect to the special at large director may be amended, altered, or repealed only by the affirmative vote of at least 90% of the members entitled to vote possessing at least 90% of the total votes outstanding, and the affirmative vote of a majority of the total membership of the Board of Directors with the director appointed by Bank of America NT & SA participating and voting affirmatively; and (iii) a vote to change the Visa International Operating Regulations or bylaws to require all members to substitute one mark, to be used throughout the world, in lieu of all other marks, except the Blue, White and Gold Bands Design, then used on the side of cards bearing the Blue, White and Gold Bands Design, requires the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the members entitled to vote possessing at least 80% of the total votes outstanding. The board of directors may amend the bylaws by an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the total membership of the board of directors, except for certain bylaw provisions, which may be amended only by an affirmative vote of 90% of the total membership of the board of directors. The members may adopt the board of directors’ proposed amendments to the certificate of incorporation by the affirmative vote of ninety percent of the members entitled to vote possessing at least ninety percent of the total votes understanding.

No provision of Section 4.5, 4.7, 4.7 or 4.8 (regarding voting rights) 4.18 (mandatory redemption of class B common stock and class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock), 4.19 (redemption of class C (series II) common stock) and, until the third anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering, Sections 5.1 (composition of the board) and 5.2 (vacancies, newly created directorships; qualification) of Visa Inc.’s certificate of incorporation may be amended, and no provision of the certificate of incorporation inconsistent with any such provisions may be adopted, without the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of each of the class A common stock, class B common stock, each series of class C common stock and, prior to the true-up distribution date, each regional class of common stock, voting separately as a class or series (and together with no other class or series), as applicable, if such amendment would adversely affect the powers, preferences or special rights of such class or series of common stock. No provision of Sections 4.24 (limitation on beneficial ownership of class A common stock), 4.26 (sale of loss shares) or 4.27 (limitation on initial public offering) of the Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation may be amended, and no provision of the certificate of incorporation inconsistent with any such provisions may be adopted, without the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the voting power of the outstanding shares of each of the class A common stock, the class B common stock, each series of class C common stock and, prior to the true-up distribution date, each regional class of common stock, each voting together as a single class of common stock. Neither the terms of the class B common stock nor the terms of the class C common stock shall be amended without, in either such case, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the class B common stock, voting separately (and

334

	Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		together with no other class or series) as a class and the affirmative votes of a majority of the class C (Series I) common stock, class C (series III) common stock and class C (series IV) common stock voting separately (and together with no other class or series) as a class. Without limiting the foregoing, any amendment of any provision of the certificate of incorporation that requires the treatment of holders of class B common stock and class C common stock ratably on an as converted basis shall not be effective unless such amendment is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of each adversely affected class of common stock. No amendment of the certificate of incorporation that would adversely and disproportionately affect the rights or privileges of any regional class of common stock in relation to any other regional class of common stock shall be effective unless such amendment is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of such adversely affected regional class of common stock.
Annual Meetings	The bylaws of Visa International provide for annual meetings to be held from time to time at such time and place as the board of directors designates.	The amended and restated bylaws of Visa Inc. provide that annual meetings may be held at any date and time designated by the board of directors and stated in the notice of the meeting. Meetings of stockholders will be held at any place designated by the board of directors, or, in the absence of any such designation, at the corporate headquarters of Visa Inc.
Appraisal Rights	Delaware law provides for appraisal rights for members of Visa International in the case of certain (but not all) mergers or consolidations involving Visa International.	Delaware law provides for appraisal rights for stockholders of Visa Inc. in the case of certain mergers or other consolidations involving Visa Inc.
Liquidation Rights	In the event of dissolution of Visa International, members are entitled to distribution of remaining assets after satisfaction of all liabilities ratably in accordance with their payment of service fees to Visa International.	Upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Visa Inc., holders of common stock of Visa Inc. are entitled to share ratably on an as converted basis in the net assets available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of debts and other liabilities, subject to the prior rights of any issued preferred shares.

335

	Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Election of Directors	Under the certificate of incorporation of Visa International, the board of directors of Visa International will be comprised of a number of directors fixed from time to time pursuant to the bylaws of Visa International; provided that Bank of America N.T. & S.A. will be entitled to appoint a director until the latest of: (i) the date of the first annual meeting of members following the calendar year in which its sales volume was less than 5% of the aggregate worldwide sales volume of all members; and (ii) the date on which it ceases to own the Blue, White and Gold Bands design mark, provided however, this right to appoint a director ceases on the date on which it ceases to be a member or member of a member of Visa International. Under the bylaws of Visa International, the number of directors constituting the board of Visa International will not be less than 17 or more than 26. The bylaws of Visa International set forth qualifications that must be met by candidates for director. The members of the board of directors of Visa International are elected or appointed as follows: •     each member (excluding a group member but including a member of a group member) whose board seat volume exceeds 5% of the total board seat volumes of all members in the preceding calendar year will be entitled to appoint one director, except that in a year in which more than five members each account for more than 5% of the total board seat volumes, only those five members with the greatest board seat volumes are entitled to appoint one director each; •     those members having their principal place of business in a country, whose aggregate board seat volumes within that country	The board of directors of Visa Inc. is divided into three classes serving staggered terms. The number of directors will be fixed from time to time by a majority vote of the board of directors of Visa Inc. Prior to the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will consist of not less than 17 nor more than 18 directors, elected as follows: •     holders of all regional classes of common stock will elect at least a majority of the directors of the board of directors (such majority or greater consisting of independent directors) by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors voting as a single class; •     holders of shares of class USA common stock will elect two directors by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting voting as a separate class; •     holders of shares of each of class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock, with such two series voting together, class Canada common stock, class AP common stock, class LAC common stock and class CEMEA common stock will elect one director for each such class by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of each such class present or represented by proxy at the meeting, in each case voting as a separate class; and •     holders of all regional classes of common stock will elect, by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders entitled to vote, voting as a

336

Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

exceeded 5% of the total board seat volumes of all members in the preceding calendar year, provided there is no member having its principal place of business within such country entitled to appoint a director pursuant to the bullet immediately above, will be able to elect one director; •     upon nomination by the president, the board of directors by three-fourths vote may appoint one director for strategic purposes; •     by an affirmative vote of 90% of the total membership of the board of directors, the board of directors will divide the countries in which members have sales volume into regions numbering not less than five nor more than seven. Those principals and Visa cash program participants having board seat volumes in a region will appoint, when added to the number of directors appointed pursuant to the first and second bullets above, by members and countries located in such region, one director from that region for each 5% or fraction thereof that their board seat volumes for the preceding calendar year bears to the aggregate worldwide board seat volumes of principals and Visa cash program participants for such preceding calendar year, except that no region shall appoint less than two nor more than eight directors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a region created after February 26, 1995 will appoint only one director until the board seat volumes within such region for the preceding calendar year is 3% or more of the aggregate

single class, one director, who, in order to qualify for election as such director, must hold the title of chief executive officer of Visa Inc. The term of the director elected by holders of shares of each of class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock, with such two series voting together, will expire on the date immediately prior to the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated. From the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated until the third anniversary of such date, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will consist of 17 directors, elected as follows: •     holders of outstanding shares of common stock of all classes will elect a number of directors equal to not less than 58% of the total number of directors comprising the full board of directors of Visa Inc. (such 58% or greater consisting of independent directors) by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors; •     holders of shares of class USA common stock will elect two directors by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting voting as a separate class; •     holders of shares of each class Canada common stock, class AP common stock, class LAC common stock and class CEMEA common stock will elect one director for each such class by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of each such class present

337

Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

worldwide board seat volumes for such preceding calendar year, at which time such region will be entitled to appoint two directors; •     a special at-large director will be elected annually by those principals, Visa cash program participants, plus issuers, and cheque issuers having board seat volumes, as the case may be, in a region where equitable voting rights have not been granted by any group member in the country where such board seat volumes were issued, or by a regional board established in the region; provided that the aggregate of such board seat volumes issued for the preceding year exceeds 3% of the aggregate worldwide board seat volumes of all members for such year; •     the chief executive officer of Visa International, upon his/her election and by virtue thereof, will become a voting member of the board of directors of Visa International; and •     a group executive vice president and any higher-ranking officer, upon his/her election and by virtue of his/her appointment by the chief executive officer of Visa International, will become a non-voting member of the board of directors of Visa International. For purposes of appointing directors as described in the bullets above, “board seat volumes” means card sales volumes, excluding: (i) domestic cash volumes; and (ii) volumes associated with V PAY branded or equivalent products generated during calendar years 2005 through 2008; provided, however, that volumes associated with Visa Commerce branded or equivalent products will be counted by multiplying the number of such transactions in each region by the average transaction amount for all worldwide commercial products.

or represented by proxy at the meeting, in each case voting as a separate class; and •     holders of all classes and series of common stock entitled to vote, voting as a single class, will elect, by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders, one director, who, in order to qualify for election as such director, must hold the title of chief executive officer of Visa Inc. From and after the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will consist of the number of directors as shall from time to time be fixed by resolution of a majority of the board of directors; provided that, at least 58% of the board of directors of Visa Inc. will be comprised of independent directors. Directors will be elected by the holders of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors.

338

	Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Governance Provisions	Visa International is managed by a global board of directors that may establish regional boards of directors to exercise the powers and authority of the board of directors within such region. The board of directors have established regional boards of directors for Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA.	Visa Inc. is managed by or under the direction of the members of the board of directors.
Taxation	Visa International is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations filing a U.S. consolidated federal income tax return. The group’s taxable income is taxed at regular corporate income tax rates. Members may be subject to taxation on any dividends they receive depending upon the applicable tax laws of their respective taxing jurisdictions.	Visa Inc. is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations filing a U.S. consolidated federal income tax return. The group’s taxable income is taxed at regular corporate income tax rates. Stockholders may be subject to taxation on any dividends they receive depending upon the applicable tax laws of their respective taxing jurisdictions.
Limited Liability	Under the certificate of incorporation of Visa International, the board of directors of Visa International has the power to establish fees payable by the members as it deems appropriate for the operations of Visa International. However, the board of directors may not levy assessments upon the members of Visa International. Pursuant to the bylaws of Visa International, losses suffered within a region are responsibilities of that region to limitation, after which such losses are borne by Visa International and other regions pursuant to the bylaws of Visa International, unless the losses are attributable to the failure of a member(s) to perform its obligations under certain of the governing documents, in which case, the region is responsible for and indemnifies Visa International against all losses. The members with their principal place of business in a given region or operating within that region will be financially responsible for all costs incurred by their respective region.	Stockholders of Visa Inc. are not subject to personal liability for the debts, obligations or liabilities of Visa Inc. In addition, the common stock of Visa Inc. is nonassessable.

339

	Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Indemnification	Visa International is required to indemnify any person who was or is a party, or is threatened to be made a party, to any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, by reason of the fact that he/she is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of Visa International, or is or was serving at the request of Visa International as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him/her in connection with such action, suit, or proceeding to the extent and under the circumstances permitted by the DGCL. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled under any by-law, agreement, vote of members or disinterested directors, or otherwise (both as to action in his/her official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office), and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee, or agent, and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of such a person. Expenses incurred in defending a civil or criminal action, suit, or proceeding may be paid by Visa International in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit, or proceeding as authorized by the board of directors in the specific case upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of Visa International to repay such amount unless it shall ultimately be determined that he/she is entitled to be indemnified by Visa International as authorized in this section.	To the fullest extent permitted by law, Visa Inc. is required to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, arbitration, alternative dispute resolution mechanism, inquiry, administrative or legal hearing or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative by reason of the fact that such person (or the legal representative of such person) is or was a director or officer of Visa Inc. or any predecessor of Visa Inc., or is or was a director or officer of the corporation serving at the request of Visa Inc. as a director or officer, employee, trustee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such proceeding. To the fullest extent permitted by law, expenses (including attorney’s fees) incurred by a person who is or was a director or officer of Visa Inc. or a member of the litigation committee in connection with any proceeding shall be paid promptly by Visa Inc. in advance of the final disposition of such Proceeding; provided, however, that if the DGCL requires, an advance of expenses incurred by any director or officer of Visa Inc. or a member of the litigation committee in his or her capacity as such (and not in any other capacity in which service was or is rendered by the indemnitee, including, without limitation, service to an employee benefit plan) shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such person to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified for such expenses by Visa Inc. The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by the certificate of incorporation are not exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of

340

	Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		expenses may be entitled under the certificate of incorporation, the bylaws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in such person’s official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office.
Redemption	The bylaws of Visa International do not provide for any redemption rights.	The certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. provides that Visa Inc. will use a portion of the net proceeds received by Visa Inc. from the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock, to redeem a portion of the outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) for a per share amount equal to the price per share of class A common stock received by Visa Inc. in the initial public offering, net of any underwriting discounts and commissions.

341

	Visa International Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Other Rights or Limitations	Visa International members are not entitled to any additional rights in connection with their membership interests.	15% Share Ownership Limitation. Unless otherwise approved by Visa Inc.’s board of directors, no person or entity may beneficially own: (i) more than 15% of the outstanding shares or voting power of class A common stock or the outstanding shares of any class of other voting stock; or (ii) shares of class A common stock and other voting stock representing more than 15% of the aggregate voting power of all the outstanding shares of stock of Visa Inc. entitled to vote on an election of directors, voting together as a single class. 5% Share Ownership Limitation. No Visa member or similar person may beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares or voting power of class A common stock or other common stock entitled at any time to vote for the election of directors. No Visa member will be deemed in violation of the foregoing limitations as a result of owning the number of shares of any applicable regional class of common stock as of immediately after the restructuring closing (or any other common stock into which such shares may subsequently be converted or any other shares issuable to such member pursuant to the transaction documents), and no initial Visa Europe transferee will be deemed in violation of the foregoing limitation as a result of owning the number of shares of class C common stock immediately after the first transfer of any shares of class C common stock by Visa Europe to such initial Visa Europe transferee.

342

Visa Canada

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Authorized Membership Interests/Capital	Visa Canada is a company without share capital. The bylaws of Visa Canada set out different categories of membership. The letters patent and bylaws of Visa Canada do not set a limit on the number of membership interests in any category.	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. authorizes the issuance of up to 2,004,199,484,030 shares, which will include, among other classes described in “Description of Capital Stock of Visa Inc.—Capitalization:” (i) 917,165,602 shares of class C common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; and (ii) 25,000,000 shares of class Canada common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The authorized class C common stock will be divided into four series of class C common stock, which will include, among other series described in “Description of Capital Stock of Visa Inc.—Capitalization,” 813,582,801 shares designated as class C (series I) common stock.
Dividends	The letters patent of Visa Canada provide that the association “will be carried on without the purpose of gain for its members and any profits or other accretions to Visa Canada will be used in promoting its objects.”	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. states that the board of directors may at its discretion decide to declare and pay dividends on the common stock out of the available assets of Visa Inc. that are by law available therefor. All holders of outstanding shares of class A common stock, class B common stock, class C common stock or, prior to the true-up distribution date, holders of outstanding shares of any regional class of common stock, as applicable, are entitled to participate ratably, on an as converted basis, in any dividend or distribution paid on the common stock, and no dividend or distribution may be declared or paid on any class or series of common stock unless an equivalent dividend is contemporaneously declared and paid on each other class and series of common stock.
Liquidity and Transferability	Members of Visa Canada may not transfer their memberships, except that the president alone or any two officers of the Visa Canada may permit a member, other than an individual member, to transfer or assign its membership to a financial institution which is a parent or subsidiary	Until: (x) in the case of the class USA common stock and the class B common stock, the later of the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated and the escrow termination date; and (y) in the case of any regional

343

Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

or affiliate if such assignee or transferee is itself eligible for membership in the association. As part of the restructuring, membership interest transferability to Visa Inc. will be permitted.

class of common stock other than the class USA common stock and any series of class C common stock, the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, no shares of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock may be transferred, except for: •     any transfer from Visa Inc. to the initial holders of any regional class of common stock, class B common stock or class C common stock; •     any transfer upon the redemption of the shares of class B common stock or class C common stock; •     any transfer by Visa Inc. to any person or entity or by the holders thereof to Visa Inc.; •     any transfer, after the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class B common stock to any other holder of class B common stock or any affiliate thereof and any transfer of any shares of class C common stock of any applicable series thereof to any other holder of class C common stock of the same series thereof or to any affiliate thereof; •     any transfer of any shares of any regional class of common stock, class B common stock or class C common stock to an affiliate of such holder; •     any transfer of any shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreement; •     any transfer by Visa Europe of any shares of class C common stock to its members, stockholders or other holders of equity interest in Visa Europe at the time of such transfer;

344

Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

provided that such transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and is made to each such initial Visa Europe transferee ratably in accordance with their respective entitlements to dividends or other distributions from Visa Europe; •     any transfer, after the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class B common stock or class C common stock by any person that is a group member of Visa International to any person that is a stockholder, member, or other equity holder of such group member; provided that such transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and is made to each such initial group member transferee ratably in accordance with the irrespective entitlements to dividends or other distributions from such group member; •     any transfer by a holder of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock to a successor of all or substantially all of the assets of such holder, or to an affiliate of such successor; •     any transfer by a holder of class B common stock, class C common stock or any regional class of common stock to any person who acquires from such holder all or substantially all of the Visa branded payments products portfolio of such holder; and •     any transfer, prior to the true-up distribution date, of any shares of class USA common stock by any holder thereof to any other holder thereof; provided that, contemporaneously with such transfer, a commensurate portion of the membership proportion (as

345

Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

calculated pursuant to the second restated Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation) is transferred from the transferor of such shares of class USA common stock to the transferee thereof, in accordance with the second restated Visa U.S.A. certificate of incorporation. The board of directors of Visa Inc. may approve one or more exceptions to the foregoing transfer restrictions in the case of any proposed transfer by a holder of class C common stock; provided that such exception applies to all holders of class C common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if it does not apply ratably, is also approved by at least 75% of Visa Inc.’s independent directors. At any time after the escrow termination date, the board of directors of Visa Inc. may approve one or more exceptions to the foregoing transfer restrictions in the case of any proposed transfer by a holder of class B common stock; provided that such exception applies to all holders of class B common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if it does not apply ratably, is also approved by at least 75% of Visa Inc.’s independent directors. The board of directors of Visa Inc. may, by resolution adopted by a majority of the board of directors of Visa Inc., extend the three year component of the lock-up periods described above with respect to any portion of the outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock for a period of not more than one year after the date on which such period would otherwise terminate (not including, in the case of class B common stock, any period by which such date of termination is exceeded by the escrow termination date); provided that: (i) contemporaneously with any such extension of the lock-up period, the board of directors of Visa Inc. has approved one or more reductions to the

346

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		lock-up period with respect to another portion of such shares of class B common stock and class C common stock, such that at all times the weighted average period of the lock-up period with respect to all outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock is not more than three years; and (ii) such extension of the lock-up period applies to all holders of class B common stock and class C common stock equally on a ratable basis or, if it does not apply ratably, is also approved by at least 75% of Visa Inc.’s independent directors.
Voting Rights	A voting member’s voting power is determined for each 12 month period beginning on the first day of the second month after the end of the financial year and until the last day of the first month after the end of the next financial year. Voting power is based upon the member’s Visa card sales volume and cheque sales volume as certified in the member’s monthly certificates filed by the member during the financial year in question. Each member receives one vote for each $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, of Visa card sales volume and cheque sales volume certified by the member during such period.	Prior to the true-up distribution date: •     each holder of class Canada common stock will have the right, with respect to each share of class Canada common stock owned of record by such holder, to cast a number of votes equal to the number of shares of class C (series I) common stock into which each share of class Canada common stock would be converted, based on the class Canada conversion rate in effect on the record date with respect to such vote; and •     each share of class C common stock will have no voting rights, except as required by law. During the period from and after the true-up distribution date until prior to the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated: •     each holder of shares of class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) will have the right, with respect to each share of class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) owned of record by such holder, to cast one vote for each share of class A common stock into which each

347

Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

share of class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) would be converted, based on the applicable conversion rate in effect on the record date with respect to such vote; and •     each holder of shares of class C (series II) common stock will have no right to vote on any matters on which stockholders generally are entitled to vote; provided, however, that a separate class vote of the holders of class C (series II) common stock will be required to approve any amendment to the amended and restated Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation that adversely affects the powers, preferences or special rights of the class C (series II) common stock, but does not so affect the powers, preferences or special rights of any other class or series of common stock of Visa Inc. From and after the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, each holder of shares of class B common stock will have no voting power; provided, however, that, in addition to any other vote required by law, for so long as any shares of class B common stock or class C common stock remain issued and outstanding: •     the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the class B common stock and class C (series I) common stock (and, prior to the conversion thereof into shares of class C (series I) common stock, the class C (series III) common stock and the class C (series IV) common stock), voting together as a single class (in which vote the class A common stock and class C (series

348

Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
	II) common stock shall not participate) separate from all other classes or series of capital stock of Visa Inc., on an as converted basis, shall be required for the approval of any consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction in which shares of class A common stock are exchanged for, converted into or changed into other stock or securities, or the right to receive cash or other property, unless the shares of class B common stock and class C common stock of all series thereof shall be exchanged for or changed into the same per share amount of stock, securities, cash or any other property, as the case may be, for which or in which each share of class A common stock is exchanged, converted or changed; and
	•      the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the common stock of all classes and series other than the class EU (series II) common stock or class C (series II) common stock, as applicable, voting together as a single class (in which vote the class EU (series II) common stock and class C (series II) common stock shall not participate) separate from all other classes or series of capital stock of Visa Inc., shall be required to authorize Visa Inc. to exit its core payments business (i.e., to no longer operate a consumer debit/credit payments business). With respect to each matter upon which holders of class C common stock are entitled to vote pursuant to applicable law or during the periods from and after the true-up distribution date until and after the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is

349

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		consummated, each such holder will have the right, with respect to each share of class C common stock (other than the class C (series II) common stock) owned of record by such holder, to a number of votes equal to the aggregate number of shares of class A common stock into which each share of class C common stock (other than the class C (series II) common stock) owned by such holder would be converted, assuming the conversion, on the record date for such vote, of all outstanding shares of class B common stock and class C common stock into class A common stock, based on the applicable conversion rate in effect on such record date. To the fullest extent permitted by law, holders of common stock will have no voting power with respect to, and will not be entitled to vote on, any amendment to the amended and restated Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of preferred stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either separately or together with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote thereon pursuant to the amended and restated Visa Inc. certificate of incorporation or pursuant to the DGCL.
Vote on Extraordinary Transactions/ Supermajority Voting Provisions	The Visa Canada bylaws provide that all business dealt with by the board of directors requires an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the directors voting and at least three directors (excluding Visa Canada’s ex officio director). Special business (the review and approval of the annual operating budget for neutral advertising and any deviation from such approved budget which would require an unbudgeted expenditure; the election of Visa Canada’s representatives on the Visa International board of directors; and the enactment, amendment or repeal of any Visa Canada bylaws) require an affirmative vote of a majority of the directors voting with the added proviso that the negative votes, if any, must not be cast by directors nominated by members with more than 20% of the total	Delaware Law requires that a merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets or a dissolution must be approved by an affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of the capital stock having the right to vote for the election of directors.

350

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
	voting power of all members of the association and the further proviso that the total affirmative votes must be cast by directors nominated by members with at least 30% of the total voting power of the members of the association. The bylaws of Visa Canada provide that all decisions of the members will require a majority of all votes eligible to be cast with the added proviso that the majority must include at least half of those members that are entitled to nominate any candidate for election to the board pursuant to the bylaws (i.e., those members which, independently, have 5% or more of the total voting power of all of the members of the association). The bylaws of Visa Canada further require the affirmative vote of 80% of all votes eligible to be cast at the meeting with respect to any application for supplementary letters patent, the confirmation of any enactment, repeal, amendment or supplement of the bylaws of Visa Canada, and the termination or dissolution of the existence of Visa Canada.
Amendments of Governing Documents	Visa Canada’s letters patent can be amended by supplementary letters patent. Subject to the extraordinary voting requirements outlined above, the Corporations Act (Ontario) requires an application for supplementary letters patent to be authorized by a resolution passed by the directors and confirmed by at least two-thirds of the votes cast at a meeting of the members. The bylaws of Visa Canada can be amended by a resolution of the directors. The amendment is effective immediately but only until the next annual meeting of the members, at which it must be approved. If not approved, it ceases to have effect at and from that time and, in that case, no new bylaws of the same or like substance has any effect until confirmed at a meeting of the members. Although the Corporations Act (Ontario) only requires approval at the director and member levels by simple majority votes, see above regarding supermajority requirements.	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. provides that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, amend, alter, change, add to or repeal the Visa Inc. bylaws without the assent or vote of the stockholders in any manner not inconsistent with the laws of the State of Delaware or its certificate of incorporation. However, any amendment, alteration, change or repeal by the board of directors of any provision of the bylaws that was adopted by the stockholders of Visa Inc. will not be effective earlier than the date that is 365 days after the date on which such provision of the bylaws was adopted by the stockholders of Visa Inc. In addition to any votes required by applicable law, without the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of each of the class A common stock, the class B common stock, each series of class

351

Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

C common stock and, prior to the true-up distribution date, each regional class of common stock, voting separately as a class or series (and together with no other class or series), as applicable: •     no provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. concerning voting rights of holders of the common stock, voting on an as converted basis, redemption of common stock, and, until the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, composition of the board of directors, vacancies thereon and newly-created directorships may be amended, altered, repealed, or otherwise modified; and •     no provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. inconsistent with any such provisions may be adopted, whether by means of formal amendment thereto or by means of any merger, consolidation, amalgamation, other business combination or otherwise, if such amendment, alteration, repeal or other modification would adversely affect the powers, preferences or special rights of such class or series of common stock. Without the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of the outstanding shares of each of the class A common stock, the class B common stock, each series of class C common stock and, prior to the true-up distribution date, each regional class of common stock, each voting together as a single class of common stock:

352

Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

•     no provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. concerning limitations on beneficial ownership of class A common stock, sales of loss shares or limitations on our initial public offering may be amended, altered, repealed or otherwise modified; and •     no provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. inconsistent with any such provisions may be adopted, whether by means of formal amendment thereto or by means of any merger, consolidation, amalgamation, other business combination or otherwise. Neither the terms of the class B common stock nor the terms of the class C common stock may be amended without, in either such case, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the class B common stock, voting separately (and together with no other class or series) as a class and the affirmative votes of a majority of the class C (series I) common stock, class C (series III) common stock and class C (series IV) common stock voting separately (and together with no other class or series) as a class. Without limiting the foregoing, any amendment of any provision of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. that requires the treatment of holders of class B common stock and class C common stock ratably on an “as converted” basis shall not be effective unless such amendment is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of each adversely affected class of common stock. No amendment of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa

353

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		Inc. that would adversely and disproportionately affect the rights or privileges of any regional class of common stock in relation to any other regional class of common stock will be effective unless such amendment is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of such adversely affected regional class of common stock. The amended and restated bylaws of Visa Inc. provide that the board of directors of Visa Inc. is expressly authorized to make, adopt, amend, supplement and repeal such bylaws without assent or vote of the stockholders, in any manner not inconsistent with the amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. or the DGCL. The Visa Inc. stockholders also have the power to adopt, amend, supplement or repeal the amended and restated bylaws of Visa Inc.
Annual Meetings	The Corporations Act (Ontario) requires annual meetings of voting members no later than six months after each financial year end. The Corporations Act (Ontario) and the Visa Canada bylaws provide that an annual meeting of the voting members must be held not more than 15 months after the last preceding annual meeting. The annual meeting of voting members is to be held at such time and on such day in each year as the board may from time to time determine.	The amended and restated bylaws of Visa Inc. provide that annual meetings may be held at any date and time designated by the board of directors and stated in the notice of the meeting. Meetings of stockholders will be held at any place designated by the board of directors, or, in the absence of any such designation, at the corporate headquarters of Visa Inc.
Appraisal Rights	The Corporations Act (Ontario) does not provide for appraisal rights in respect of companies without share capital.	Delaware law provides for appraisal rights for stockholders of Visa Inc. in the case of certain mergers or other consolidations involving Visa Inc.
Liquidation Rights	The letters patent of Visa Canada provide that, upon its dissolution and after the payment of all debts and liabilities, its remaining property is to be distributed or disposed of to “an organization or organizations having cognate or similar objects.”	Upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Visa Inc., holders of common stock of Visa Inc. are entitled to share ratably on an as converted basis in the net assets available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of debts and other liabilities, subject to the prior rights of any issued preferred shares.

354

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Election of Directors	The voting members of Visa Canada are entitled to vote for the election of the directors. No voting member is entitled to nominate more than one candidate for election to the board. A number of categories of members are not entitled to nominate any candidate for election to the board. Each member which is entitled to vote and is entitled to nominate a candidate and which, independently, has 5% or more of the total voting power of all of the members of the association is entitled to nominate a candidate for election to the board. In addition, there is a requirement for regional representation on the board, as well as a requirement for an at large director. The president of Visa Canada also becomes an ex officio voting member of the board. The board itself, by a two-thirds vote, is entitled to appoint non-voting board advisors of the board of directors (to a maximum of five at any one time).	The board of directors of Visa Inc. is divided into three classes serving staggered terms. The number of directors will be fixed from time to time by a majority vote of the board of directors of Visa Inc., subject to applicable provisions of the amended and restated Visa Inc. Certificate of Incorporation. Prior to the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will consist of not less than 17 nor more than 18 directors, elected as follows: •     holders of all regional classes of common stock will elect independent directors comprising at least a majority of the directors of the board of directors (such majority or greater consisting of independent directors) by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors voting as a single class; •     holders of shares of class USA common stock will elect two directors by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting voting as a separate class; •     holders of shares of each of class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock, with such two series voting together as a single class class Canada common stock, class AP common stock, class LAC common stock and class CEMEA common stock will each elect one director for each such class by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of each such class present or represented by proxy at the meeting, in each case voting as a separate class; and

355

Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)

Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)

•     holders of all regional classes of common stock will elect, by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders entitled to vote, voting as a single class, one director, who, in order to qualify for election as such director, must hold the title of chief executive officer of Visa Inc. The term of the director elected by holders of shares of our class EU (series I) and class EU (series III) common stock, with such two series voting together, will expire on the date immediately prior to the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated. From the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated until the third anniversary of such date, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will consist of 17 directors, elected as follows: •     holders of outstanding shares of common stock of all classes will elect a number of independent directors equal to not less than 58% of the total number of directors comprising the full board of directors of Visa Inc. consisting of independent directors) by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors; •     holders of shares of class USA common stock will elect two directors by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders present or represented by proxy at the meeting voting as a separate class; •     holders of shares of each class Canada common stock, class AP common stock, class LAC common stock and class CEMEA common stock will elect one

356

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		director for each such class by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of each such class present or represented by proxy at the meeting, in each case voting as a separate class; and •     holders of all classes and series of common stock entitled to vote, voting as a single class, will elect, by a plurality of the votes cast by such holders, one director, who, in order to qualify for election as such director, must hold the title of chief executive officer of Visa Inc. From and after the third anniversary of the date on which the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock is consummated, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will consist of the number of directors as shall from time to time be fixed by resolution of a majority of the board of directors; provided that at least 58% of the board of directors of Visa Inc. will be comprised of independent directors. Directors will be elected by the holders of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of such directors.
Governance Provisions	Visa Canada is managed by a board of directors.	Visa Inc. is managed by or under the direction of the members of the board of directors.
Taxation	For purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada), Visa Canada operates as a not-for-profit organization that is exempt from tax under Part I of the Income Tax Act (Canada). Pursuant to the letters patent of Visa Canada, members are not entitled to dividends or other distributions from Visa Canada.	Visa Inc. is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations filing a U.S. consolidated federal income tax return. The group’s taxable income is taxed at regular corporate income tax rates. Stockholders may be subject to taxation on any dividends they receive depending upon the applicable tax laws of their respective taxing jurisdictions.

357

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
Limited Liability	The Corporations Act (Ontario) provides that “a member shall not, as such, be held answerable or responsible for any act, default, obligation or liability of the corporation or for any engagement, claim, payment, loss, injury, transaction, matter or thing relating to or connected with the corporation.” Pursuant to the Visa Canada bylaws, the president of Visa Canada together with those senior executives of the association responsible for legal, marketing, product and treasury are entitled to determine from time to time the imposition of, the levels and modes of calculation of, and times of payment of fees payable by members. Each member is bound by any such determination and required to pay all such fees to remain in good standing with the association. The president of Visa Canada and the aforementioned senior executives are entitled to determine interchange fees from time to time. The Visa Canada bylaws also provide that a member whose membership is suspended or terminated is not entitled to any refund of any fees previously paid or payable, and continues to be responsible for any financial or other obligations, whether to other members, to the association, to Chargex Ltd., to Visa International or otherwise, existing from its membership prior to termination involving the use of payment products issued or sold in association with the various Visa trademarks.	Stockholders of Visa Inc. are not subject to personal liability for the debts, obligations or liabilities of Visa Inc. In addition, the common stock of Visa Inc. is nonassessable.
Indemnification	The Corporations Act (Ontario) allows the directors and officers of Visa Canada to be indemnified and saved harmless out of the funds of the company from and against actions, suits and proceedings brought against directors and officers for or in respect of anything done or permitted to be done by them in the execution of their duties of their office, and all other costs and expenses sustained or incurred by them in or about or in relation to the affairs thereof, except costs and expenses occasioned by their own willful	Delaware law permits indemnification of officers and directors against all expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred in any action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the company. It is also permitted to advance to the officers and directors all related expenses, subject to reimbursement if it is determined subsequently that indemnification is not permitted. Visa Inc. will indemnify all officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.

358

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
	neglect or default. The amended and restated bylaws of Visa Canada provide for indemnification of directors and officers in respect of any civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which any of them is made a party by reason of being or having been a director or an officer of Visa Canada or acting or having acted at the request of Visa Canada as a director or officer of any other body in which Visa Canada is or has been or may become a shareholder, member or creditor or in which the association is in any way interested if such director or officer acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of Visa Canada and, in the case of a criminal or administrative action or proceeding that is enforced by a monetary penalty, the director or officer had reasonable grounds for believing that his or her conduct was lawful. The Corporation’s Act (Ontario) provides that a corporation may purchase and maintain insurance for a director or officer against any liability incurred by such person in the capacity as a director or officer, except where the liability relates to the person’s failure to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation.	Visa Inc. is not obligated to indemnify any director or officer in connection with a proceeding initiated by such person unless: (i) such proceeding was authorized or consented to by the board of directors; or (ii) such director or officer has been successful on the merits in any such proceeding. Visa Inc. may, to the extent authorized from time to time by or pursuant to action by the board of directors of Visa Inc., provide rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses to employees and agents of Visa Inc. similar to those conferred to directors and officers of Visa Inc. To the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL or any other applicable law, Visa Inc. may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of Visa Inc., or is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of Visa Inc. serving at the request of Visa Inc. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another organization against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such person’s status as such, whether or not Visa Inc. would have the power or the obligation to indemnify such person against such liability.
Redemption	The bylaws of Visa Canada do not provide for redemption rights, but do provide for involuntary suspension or removal of members as well as automatic termination of membership upon the occurrence of certain events.	The amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Visa Inc. provides that Visa Inc. will use a portion of the net proceeds received by Visa Inc. from the initial public offering of shares of class A common stock, to redeem shares of class B common stock and class C common stock (other than class C (series II) common stock) for a per share amount equal to the price per share of class A common stock received by Visa Inc. in the initial public offering, net of any underwriting discounts and commissions. The certificate of incorporation provides that either Visa Inc. or Visa

359

	Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
		Europe may request the redemption of all, but not less than all, of the outstanding shares of class C (series II) common stock for a per share amount equal to a specified aggregate amount reserved for such redemption divided by the total number of shares of class C (series II) common stock outstanding on the date of such redemption.
Other Rights or Limitations	The members of Visa Canada may, by a majority of the votes cast at a general meeting called for that purpose, pass a resolution requiring Visa Canada to be wound up. In addition, the members by a majority of the votes cast at such meeting can apply to court for an order requiring the wind up of Visa Canada. Any member can also apply for a court order winding up the company on certain grounds that are set out in the Corporations Act (Ontario) which include where, in the opinion of the court, it is just and equitable for some reason, other than the bankruptcy or insolvency of the association, that it should be wound up. The Corporations Act (Ontario) provides that one-tenth of the members that are entitled to vote at a meeting of members may require the directors of the association to call a meeting of members. If the members of Visa Canada request the calling of a meeting of members and if the directors do not do so within 21 days, any of the requisitionists are entitled to call the meeting. Any reasonable expenses incurred by the requisitionists by reason of the failure of the directors to call the meeting are required to be repaid to them by the corporation and are to be deducted from any fees or other remuneration payable to the directors in default (although this requirement can be overridden by a majority of votes cast by the members at the meeting itself). Where a member of a corporation is aggrieved by the failure of the corporation or a director, officer or employee of the	15% Share Ownership Limitation. Unless otherwise approved by Visa Inc.’s board of directors, no person or entity may beneficially own: (i) more than 15% of the outstanding shares or voting power of class A common stock or the outstanding shares of any class of other voting stock; or (ii) shares of class A common stock and other voting stock representing more than 15% of the aggregate voting power of all the outstanding shares of stock of Visa Inc. entitled to vote on an election of directors, voting together as a single class. 5% Share Ownership Limitation. No Visa member or similar person may beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares or voting power of class A common stock or other common stock entitled at any time to vote for the election of directors; provided, however, that: no Visa member will be deemed in violation of the foregoing limitation as a result of owning the number of shares of any applicable regional class of common stock as of immediately after the restructuring closing (or any other common stock into which such shares may subsequently be converted or any other shares issuable to such member pursuant to the transaction documents).

360

Visa Canada Memberships (before the restructuring)	Visa Inc. Common Stock (after the restructuring)
corporation to perform any duty imposed by the Corporations Act (Ontario), the member, despite the imposition of any penalty and in addition to any other right that such member may have, may apply to court for an order directing the corporation, director, officer or employee, as the case may be, to perform such duty.

361

ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF THE RESTRUCTURING

The restructuring will be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Visa U.S.A. will be deemed to be the acquirer of Visa Canada and Visa International (including Visa Europe’s interest in Visa International) for accounting purposes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The factors considered in this determination include:

• Holders of Visa U.S.A.’s outstanding membership interests will receive a majority of the shares of the combined company and will control a majority of the stockholder voting rights;

• Visa U.S.A.’s historical business represents the largest portion of the historical assets, revenues, and earnings of the combined companies; and

• Visa U.S.A. has the largest relative net asset size, based on fair value, when compared to the other entities involved in the Visa merger.

Under the purchase method, the estimated purchase price of Visa International and Visa Canada will be the fair value of the net assets acquired. The purchase price will be allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair value at the date of the completion of the restructuring. Visa Inc. will record goodwill to the extent that the estimated purchase price exceeds the estimated fair value of net assets acquired.

The allocation of the purchase price is preliminary and will remain such until Visa Inc. obtains an independent valuation to support its comprehensive analysis of identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The final determination of the purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as soon as practicable after consummation of the restructuring. The final amounts allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed could be materially different from the amounts presented in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.

362

UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the restructuring and the true-up to certain U.S. holders and certain non-U.S. holders (each as defined below), and of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations generally applicable to certain non-U.S. holders with respect to the ownership and disposition of Visa Inc. common stock. This discussion is subject to the assumptions and limitations contained herein. This discussion does not address any tax consequences or tax considerations arising under the laws of any state, local or non-U.S. jurisdiction. This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code, the regulations of the U.S. Treasury Department and court and administrative rulings and decisions in effect and available on the date of this proxy statement-prospectus, any of which may change, possibly retroactively. Such a change could affect the continuing validity of this discussion. This discussion is also based on certain representations that have been provided by Visa International as of the date of this proxy statement-prospectus and the assumption that such representations will be true, accurate and complete in all material respects as of the completion of the restructuring and the true-up.

For purposes of this discussion, the term “U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner, as the case may be, of Visa U.S.A. membership interests, Visa International membership interests or Visa Inc. common stock, which we refer to collectively as Visa Equity, that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is:

• a citizen or resident of the United States;

• a corporation, or an entity treated as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state or political subdivision thereof, including the District of Columbia;

• an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

• a trust if it has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or if (1) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and (2) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of such trust.

If a partnership (or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds Visa Equity, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding Visa Equity, you should consult your tax advisor.

The term “non-U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of Visa Equity, other than an entity or arrangement classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is not a U.S. holder.

This discussion assumes that you hold your interests in Visa Equity as capital assets within the meaning of the Code. Further, except as specifically set forth below, this discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to you in light of your particular circumstances or that may be applicable to you if you are subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including if you are:

• a tax-exempt organization;

• an S corporation or other pass-through entity;

• an insurance company;

• a financial institution;

• a mutual fund;

• a dealer in stock and securities, or foreign currencies;

• a trader in securities who elects the mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities;

363

• a holder of Visa Equity subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code;

• a holder of Visa Equity who received his or her Visa Equity through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation or through a tax-qualified retirement plan;

• certain expatriates or a person that has a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar;

• a regulated investment company;

• a real estate investment trust;

• a controlled foreign corporation;

• a passive foreign investment company;

• Visa Europe or any other non-U.S. holder who actually or constructively has owned, owns or is deemed to own 5% or more, by voting power or value, of the equity interests in Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A. or Visa International, as the case may be, either at any time during the five year period up to and including the date of the restructuring or at anytime after the restructuring;

• a holder of options granted under any Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A. or Visa International benefit plan; or

• a holder of Visa Equity who holds Visa Equity as part of a hedge against currency risk, a straddle or a constructive sale or a conversion transaction.

In addition, this discussion does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the restructuring and the true-up to holders of Visa Canada interests. If you are such a holder described in this paragraph, you should consult your tax advisor.

Holders of Visa Equity are strongly urged to consult their tax advisors as to the specific U.S. federal income tax consequences of the restructuring and the true-up to such holders, and the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to such holders with respect to the ownership and disposition of such Visa Equity, including the applicability and effect of U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. income and other tax laws to their particular circumstances.

The Restructuring and the True-Up

Holders of Visa Equity are advised that this discussion does not address the tax consequences of the potential initial public offering and any related transactions. The tax consequences of such transactions may be extremely complex, and holders are strongly urged to consult their tax advisors as to the specific U.S. federal income tax consequences of the potential initial public offering and any related transactions, including, without limitation the possibility that the potential initial public offering and/or any related transactions are integrated with the restructuring and the true-up for U.S. federal income tax purposes. There can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the potential initial public offering and/or any related transactions are integrated with the restructuring and the true-up. This discussion and White & Case LLP’s opinion noted below assume that the restructuring and the true-up will be respected as an independent series of transactions that is not integrated with the potential initial public offering and/or any related transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

This discussion and White & Case LLP’s opinion are based in part on the conclusion by White & Case LLP that certain steps of the restructuring and the true-up will be treated as exchanges described in Section 351 of the Code, which is a conclusion that would not be different even if the restructuring and the true-up were integrated for U.S. federal income tax purposes with the potential initial public offering. If the IRS were successful in taking the position that the restructuring and the true-up should be integrated for U.S. federal income tax purposes with the potential initial public offering, the transactions that are contemplated to be entered into in connection with the potential initial public offering could cause the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the integrated transaction (other than the treatment of certain steps of the restructuring and the true-up as exchanges described in Section 351 of the Code) to be different than the tax consequences of the restructuring and true-up described below.

364

U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of the Restructuring and the True-Up

Based on the foregoing, and subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth herein, White & Case LLP is of the opinion that the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the restructuring and the true-up to the members of Visa International (other than Visa Europe, Visa Canada and certain other holders as noted above) and the members of Visa U.S.A. are as follows:

• Each member of Visa International will be treated as having exchanged: (A) the equity rights associated with its current membership interest in Visa International for an “equity membership interest” in Visa International; and (B) its rights to participate in the Visa payments system for a “non-equity membership interest” in Visa International, which we refer to collectively as the Visa International Recapitalization.

• Each member of Visa U.S.A. will be treated as having exchanged: (A) the equity rights associated with its current membership interest in Visa U.S.A. for an “equity membership interest” in Visa U.S.A.; and (B) its rights to participate in the Visa payments system for a “non-equity membership interest” in Visa U.S.A., which we refer to collectively as the Visa U.S.A. Recapitalization and together with the Visa International Recapitalization, the Recapitalizations.

• The equity rights associated with a current membership interest in Visa International and the equity membership interest in Visa International will each be treated as stock of Visa International.

• The equity rights associated with a current membership interest in Visa U.S.A. and the equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A. will each be treated as stock of Visa U.S.A.

• Insofar as it relates to the exchange of equity rights associated with current membership interests in Visa International for equity membership interests in Visa International, the Visa International Recapitalization will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Code. Visa International will be a party to a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code.

• Insofar as it relates to the exchange of equity rights associated with current membership interests in Visa U.S.A. for equity membership interests in Visa U.S.A., the Visa U.S.A. Recapitalization will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Code. Visa U.S.A. will be a party to a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code.

• No gain or loss will be recognized by a member of Visa International as a result of the exchange of the equity rights associated with its current membership interest in Visa International for an equity membership interest in Visa International.

• No gain or loss will be recognized by a member of Visa U.S.A. as a result of the exchange of the equity rights associated with its current membership interest in Visa U.S.A. for an equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A.

• No gain or loss will be recognized by a member of Visa International as a result of the exchange of its rights to participate in the Visa payments system for a non-equity membership interest in Visa International.

• No gain or loss will be recognized by a member of Visa U.S.A. as a result of the exchange of its rights to participate in the Visa payments system for a non-equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A.

• The basis of a member of Visa International in its equity membership interest in Visa International will equal the member’s basis in the equity rights associated with its current membership interest in Visa International immediately before the Visa International Recapitalization.

• The basis of a member of Visa U.S.A. in its equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A. will equal the member’s basis in the equity rights associated with its current membership interest in Visa U.S.A. immediately before the Visa U.S.A. Recapitalization.

365

• The holding period of a member of Visa International for its equity membership interest in Visa International will include the period during which the member held the equity rights associated with its current membership interest in Visa International, provided that those equity rights are held as a capital asset on the date of the Visa International Recapitalization.

• The holding period of a member of Visa U.S.A. for its equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A. will include the period during which the member held the equity rights associated with its current membership interest in Visa U.S.A., provided that those equity rights are held as a capital asset on the date of the Visa U.S.A. Recapitalization.

• No gain or loss will be recognized by Visa International and Visa U.S.A. as a result of the Recapitalizations.

• Each member of Visa International will be treated as having transferred its equity membership interest in Visa International solely in exchange for common stock of Visa Inc.

• Each member of Visa U.S.A. will be treated as having transferred its equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A. solely in exchange for common stock of Visa Inc.

• No gain or loss will be recognized by a member of Visa International on the deemed transfer of its equity membership interest in Visa International, or by a member of Visa U.S.A. on the deemed transfer of its equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A., to Visa Inc. in exchange for common stock of Visa Inc., taking into consideration the conversion of Visa Inc. common stock into an as of yet undetermined number of class B common stock or class C common stock of Visa Inc., as the case may be, in connection with the true-up.

• Notwithstanding the immediately preceding paragraph, as to the conversion of Visa Inc. common stock into an as of yet undetermined number of shares of class B common stock or class C common stock of Visa Inc., as the case may be, in connection with the true-up, a portion of such shares may be treated as imputed interest. As to any such imputed interest, a stockholder will be required to recognize ordinary income. If a stockholder is not a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Visa Inc. may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% of the imputed interest or, if applicable, at a lower treaty rate.

• No gain or loss will be recognized by Visa Inc. on the receipt of the equity membership interests in Visa International and the equity membership interests in Visa U.S.A. in exchange for common stock of Visa Inc.

• Except as to any shares treated as imputed interest, as described above, the basis of a member of Visa International or a member of Visa U.S.A. in the Visa Inc. common stock received will be the same as the basis of the member in its equity membership interest in Visa International or equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A., as the case may be, immediately after the recapitalizations. You should consult with your own tax advisor regarding your basis in any shares treated as imputed interest.

• Except as to any shares treated as imputed interest, as described above, the holding period for the Visa Inc. common stock received by a member of Visa International or a member of Visa U.S.A. will include the period during which the equity membership interest in Visa International or the equity membership interest in Visa U.S.A. was held, provided that the equity membership interests are held as capital assets on the date of the restructuring. You should consult your own tax advisor regarding your holding period for any shares treated as imputed interest.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the opinion of White & Case LLP does not apply to the extent that the fair market value of Visa Inc. common stock received by a member of Visa International or by a member of Visa U.S.A. pursuant to the restructuring and the true-up (whether received on the date of closing of the restructuring or thereafter) is different from the fair market value of such member’s equity interest in Visa International or Visa U.S.A., as the case may be, immediately before the commencement of the restructuring. White & Case LLP

366

is unable to opine as to such difference because, in transactions similar to the restructuring and the true-up, treatment as an exchange described in Section 351 of the Code generally applies only to the extent that a taxpayer transfers property to a corporation in exchange for stock having the same fair market value. The IRS might therefore take the position that the difference (whether received on the date of closing of the restructuring or thereafter), in the case of an excess of value received over value surrendered, should not be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as having been received in exchange for property. As a result, a member of Visa International or a member of Visa U.S.A. could be required to recognize income, but only to the extent of the excess or shortfall of value received over value surrendered.

In rendering its opinion, White & Case LLP has relied, among other things, on: factual statements, assumptions, representations and covenants made by Visa Inc., including those contained in this proxy statement-prospectus, in the representation letter provided by Visa Inc. as of the date of this proxy statement-prospectus, and in the restructuring agreement, and including an assumption regarding the completion of the restructuring and the true-up in the manner contemplated by the restructuring agreement and this proxy statement-prospectus. In addition, White & Case LLP’s opinion assumes the absence of changes in existing facts or in law between the date of this proxy statement-prospectus and the effective time of the restructuring, and that all of the factual statements, representations and covenants made by Visa Inc. will continue to be true and accurate in all material respects as of the effective time of the restructuring. If any of the factual statements, representations, covenants or assumptions are inaccurate, incomplete or untrue or any of the covenants are breached, White & Case LLP’s opinion contained herein could be affected.

The opinion of White & Case LLP is not binding on the IRS. Visa Inc. has not sought and does not intend to seek any ruling from the IRS regarding any matters relating to the restructuring and the true-up, and as a result, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not take, or that a court will not sustain, a position that the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the restructuring and the true-up are materially different from those described in the bullet-point paragraphs above and in other parts of this discussion.

BECAUSE OF THE COMPLEXITY OF THE TAX LAWS, AND BECAUSE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE RESTRUCTURING AND THE TRUE-UP TO A MEMBER OF VISA INTERNATIONAL OR A MEMBER OF VISA U.S.A. MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE DESCRIBED ABOVE OR BE AFFECTED BY MATTERS NOT DISCUSSED ABOVE, YOU ARE URGED TO CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISORS ABOUT YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AND ABOUT THE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO YOU OF THE RESTRUCTURING AND THE TRUE-UP, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF STATE, LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX LAWS, AND ANY PROPOSED CHANGES IN APPLICABLE TAX LAWS.

Reporting Requirements

If you receive Visa Inc. common stock as a result of the restructuring and the true-up, you may be required to retain and make available to the IRS records pertaining to the restructuring and the true-up, including information regarding the amount, basis, and fair market value of all property transferred, and if you own at least one percent (by vote or value) of the total outstanding stock of Visa Inc. after the restructuring or the true-up, you may be required to attach to your U.S. federal income tax return (if any) for the year in which the restructuring takes place a statement setting forth certain facts relating to the restructuring and the true-up, including the basis and fair market value of all property transferred.

Ownership and Disposition by Non-U.S. Holders of Stock in Visa Inc.

Distributions on Visa Inc. Common Stock

If you are a non-U.S. holder of Visa Inc. common stock, the gross amount of any distribution of cash or property, other than certain distributions, if any, of Visa Inc. common stock distributed pro rata to all common stockholders of Visa Inc., that Visa Inc. makes to you with respect to its common stock will constitute dividends

367

to the extent such distributions are paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. If a distribution exceeds the current and accumulated earnings and profits of Visa Inc. as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, the excess will be treated as a tax-free return of your adjusted basis in your Visa Inc. common stock and thereafter as capital gain.

Generally, but subject to the discussions below under “Status as United States Real Property Holding Corporation” and “Backup Withholding and Information Reporting Requirements,” if you are a non-U.S. holder of Visa Inc. common stock, distributions of cash or property (other than certain distributions, if any, of Visa Inc. common stock distributed pro rata to all common stockholders of Visa Inc.) paid to you will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable U.S. income tax treaty. In order to obtain the benefit of any applicable U.S. income tax treaty, you must provide a properly executed Internal Revenue Service form (e.g., Form W-8BEN). Such forms generally would contain your name and address and a certification that you are eligible for the benefits of such treaty.

Except as may be otherwise provided in an applicable U.S. income tax treaty, if you are a non-U.S. holder of Visa Inc. common stock and conduct a trade or business within the United States, you generally will be taxed at ordinary U.S. federal income tax rates (on a net income basis) on dividends that are effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business, and such dividends will not be subject to the withholding described above. If you are a foreign corporation, you may also be subject to a 30% “branch profits tax” unless you qualify for a lower rate under an applicable U.S. income tax treaty. To claim an exemption from withholding because the income is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, you must provide a properly executed Form W-8ECI (or such successor form as the Internal Revenue Service designates) prior to the payment of dividends.

Sale or Other Disposition of Visa Inc. Common Stock

Generally, but subject to the discussions below under “Status as United States Real Property Holding Corporation” and “Backup Withholding and Information Reporting Requirements,” if you are a non-U.S. holder of Visa Inc. common stock, you will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of Visa Inc. common stock unless: (1) such gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States; or (2) if you are an individual, you are present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of such sale or other disposition and certain other conditions are met.

Status as United States Real Property Holding Corporation

If you are a non-U.S. holder of Visa Inc. common stock, under certain circumstances, gain recognized on the sale or exchange of, and certain distributions in excess of basis with respect to, the common stock of Visa Inc. would be subject to U.S. federal income tax, notwithstanding your lack of other connections with the United States, if Visa Inc. is or has been a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time during the five-year period ending on the date of such sale or exchange (or distribution). Visa Inc. believes that it will not be classified as a United States real property holding corporation as of the date of this proxy statement-prospectus and does not expect to become a United States real property holding corporation. If Visa Inc. is or becomes a United States real property holding corporation and a class of common stock of Visa Inc. is considered regularly traded on an established securities market under the applicable Code provisions, a non-U.S. holder of Visa Inc. common stock who, actually or constructively, holds or held (at any time during the shorter of the five-year period preceding the date of the sale or exchange (or distribution) or the non-U.S. holder’s holding period) more than 5% of such regularly traded class of common stock of Visa Inc. will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the sale or exchange of (or certain distributions in excess of basis with respect to) such common stock, but a non-U.S. holder of a lesser amount (actually or constructively) of such regularly traded class of common stock of Visa Inc. generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the sale or exchange of (or certain distributions in excess of basis with respect to) such common stock.

368

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting Requirements

U.S. backup withholding tax and information reporting requirements generally apply to certain payments to certain noncorporate holders of stock. Information reporting generally will apply to payments of dividends on, and to proceeds from the sale or redemption of, common stock made within the United States, or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, to a holder of common stock, other than an exempt recipient, including a corporation, a payee that is not a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes that provides an appropriate certification and certain other persons. A payor will be required to withhold backup withholding tax from any payments of dividends on, or the proceeds from the sale or redemption of, common stock within the United States, or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, to a holder, other than an exempt recipient, if such holder fails to furnish its correct taxpayer identification number or otherwise fails to comply with, or establish an exemption from, such backup withholding tax requirements. The backup withholding tax rate is 28% for years through 2010. If you are not a United States person, under current U.S. Treasury Regulations, backup withholding will not apply to distributions on Visa Inc. common stock to you, provided that we have received valid certifications meeting the requirements of the Code and neither Visa Inc. nor the payor has actual knowledge or reason to know that you are a United States person for purposes of such backup withholding tax requirements.

Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding tax rules from a payment to a holder can be refunded or credited against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner.

The foregoing discussion of certain U.S. federal income and other tax consequences is not intended to constitute a complete analysis of all tax consequences relating to the restructuring and the true-up or the ownership and disposition of Visa Inc. common stock. You should consult your own tax advisor concerning the tax consequences of your particular situation.

369

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the common stock offered by this proxy statement-prospectus will be passed upon for Visa Inc. by White & Case LLP, New York, New York. In addition, White & Case LLP will pass upon certain United States federal income tax consequences of the restructuring for Visa Inc.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements and Schedule II of Visa International and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006 have been included herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP (United States), independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The consolidated financial statements of Visa U.S.A. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006 have been included herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP (United States), independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force No. 02-14, Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other than Common Stock during the year ended September 30, 2005.

The consolidated financial statements of Visa Canada and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006 have been included herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP (Canada), independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The balance sheet of Visa Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 19, 2007 has been included herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP (United States), independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

Visa Inc. has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the shares of our common stock being offered in the restructuring. This proxy statement-prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not contain all the information set forth in the registration statement. Some items of information are contained in exhibits to the registration statement, as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. Statements made in this proxy statement-prospectus as to the content of any contract, agreement or other document filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily complete. With respect to those statements, you should refer to the corresponding exhibit for a more complete description of the matter involved and read all statements in this proxy statement-prospectus in light of that exhibit.

Following completion of the restructuring, Visa Inc. will be required to file reports and other information with the SEC on an ongoing basis. We intend to furnish holders of our common stock with annual reports containing audited financial statements with a report thereon by our independent certified public accountants.

370

You may read and copy any document that Visa Inc. files at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such material can be obtained at prescribed rates from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the public reference facilities may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy and proxy statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the site is http://www.sec.gov.

371

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	PAGE
VISA INC.
As of June 19, 2007
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-3
Balance Sheet	F-4
Notes to Balance Sheet	F-5
VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
As of September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 and for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-8
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-9
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-10
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Members’ Equity	F-11
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	F-11
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-12
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-13
As of March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-59
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-60
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Members’ Equity	F-61
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	F-61
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-62
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-63
VISA U.S.A. INC.
As of September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 and for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-81
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-82
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-83
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Deficit)	F-84
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	F-84
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-85
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-87
As of March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-127
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-128
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity	F-129
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	F-129
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-130
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-131

F-1

	PAGE
VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION
As of September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 and for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-144
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position	F-145
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-146
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets	F-147
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-148
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-149
As of March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 and for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position	F-158
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-159
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets	F-160
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-161
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-162

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Visa Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Visa Inc. as of June 19, 2007. This financial statement is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit of the balance sheet provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the balance sheet referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Visa Inc. as of June 19, 2007 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California

June 20, 2007

F-3

Visa Inc.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa International Services Association)

Balance Sheet

As of June 19, 2007

(in dollars)

	June 19, 2007
Assets
Total Assets	$	—
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity
Total Liabilities	$	—
Stockholder’s equity
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100 shares authorized, issued, and outstanding		—
Additional paid-in capital		2,001
Stockholder subscription receivable		(1	)
Accumulated deficit		(2,000	)
Total stockholder’s equity		—
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	—

See accompanying notes to the balance sheet.

F-4

Visa Inc.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa International Services Association)

Notes to Balance Sheet

1. Formation and Basis of Presentation

Visa Inc. (the “Company”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Visa International Service Association (the “Parent” or “Visa International”), was incorporated in Delaware on May 25, 2007. The Company was established to facilitate the proposed restructuring of Visa set forth in the Global Restructuring Agreement (“GRA”) dated June 15, 2007 between Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe, Visa Canada and other Visa affiliates. The Company is currently a shell entity, and as such, does not have significant operations. Consequently, the Company has omitted the statements of operations, cash flows and stockholder’s equity. Joseph W. Saunders, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company’s board, is currently serving as the sole director of the Company.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Subscription Receivable – Amounts receivable from Visa International associated with issuance of Visa Inc. stock are accounted for as contra-equity. These amounts are assessed for collectibility by the Company at each balance sheet date.

Organization costs – Costs of incorporation were paid by the Parent. These costs have been pushed down to Visa Inc. as an expense of the Company (which is included in Accumulated Deficit in the accompanying Balance Sheet) with a corresponding credit to contributed (paid-in) capital in accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5.T.

3. Stockholder’s Equity

On June 19, 2007, there are 100 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, authorized, issued and outstanding. All shares are held by the Parent.

On June 19, 2007, the Company has a note receivable from the Parent for $1, which is presented as a reduction of stockholder’s equity until it is paid by the Parent.

4. Global Restructuring Agreement

On June 15, 2007, the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe approved the GRA, an agreement that contemplates a series of transactions through which Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Inovant will become subsidiaries of the Company. The GRA contemplates that Visa Europe will not become a subsidiary of Visa Inc. Visa Europe will enter into a series of contractual relationships that will govern its relationship and will become a stockholder of Visa Inc. To effectuate the restructuring discussed above, the Company anticipates authorizing and issuing several classes of stock to the financial institution members of Visa U.S.A., to eligible financial institution members of Visa International (affiliated with the Visa Asia Pacific, Visa Latin America Caribbean and Visa Central Europe Middle East and Africa regions), to the financial institution members of Visa Canada and to Visa Europe, as follows:

F-5

Class or Series	Par Value		To Be Authorized	To Be Issued in the Proposed Restructuring
Preferred stock	$	0.0001	25,000,000
Common stock
Class A common stock	$	0.0001	2,001,622,245,209
Class B common stock	$	0.0001	622,245,209
Class C series I common stock	$	0.0001	813,582,801
Class C series II common stock	$	0.0001	38,582,801
Class C series III common stock	$	0.0001	64,000,000
Class C series IV common stock	$	0.0001	1,000,000
Regional classes and series of common stock
Class USA common stock	$	0.0001	622,245,209	426,390,481
Class EU series I common stock	$	0.0001	64,000,000	62,213,201
Class EU series II common stock	$	0.0001	38,582,801	27,904,464
Class EU series III common stock	$	0.0001	1,000,000	549,587
Class Canada common stock	$	0.0001	25,000,000	22,034,685
Class AP common stock	$	0.0001	130,000,000	119,100,481
Class LAC common stock	$	0.0001	90,000,000	80,137,915
Class CEMEA common stock	$	0.0001	42,000,000	36,749,698
			2,004,199,484,030	775,080,512

The initial allocation of shares of Visa Inc. is subject to subsequent conversion and reallocation, which is referred to as the true-up, based on each participating region’s relative under- or over-achievement of the performance targets set forth in the GRA during a four quarter period leading up to an initial public offering of Visa Inc. Specifically, each region’s performance will be compared to its projected performance for the trailing four quarters reported in the final and effective Form S-1 to offer shares of Visa Inc. in an initial public offering.

The stock set forth above is also subject to various redemption and conversion provisions, all of which are contingent upon an initial public offering of the Company, among other things.

Put-Call Option Agreement on Visa Europe Shares

As part of the GRA, the Company will enter into a put-call option agreement with Visa Europe. Under this agreement, the Company is entitled to purchase all of the share capital of Visa Europe from its members at any time following certain triggering dates, but in any event not before the closing of an initial public offering. A triggering event will occur if: (A) there is a 25% or greater decline in the number of merchants and a 45% or greater decline in the number of automated teller machines in Visa Europe’s region that accept Visa branded products; (B) such rate of decline in each case is at least twice as a much as both: (i) the average rate of decline in the number of merchants and ATMs in the Visa Europe region that accept general payment cards and (ii) the average rate of decline in acceptance, if any, in the number of merchants and ATMs outside of Visa Europe’s region that accept Visa branded cards; and (c) Visa Europe has failed to deliver and implement a remediation plan within six months of the occurrence of either such event (the call option). Further, Visa Europe is entitled to require us to purchase from the members of Visa Europe all of its share capital any time after the earlier of 365 days following the initial public offering date or 605 days after the closing date of the restructuring (the put option).

The price per share at which both the call and put option are exercisable is calculated using a formula principally based on Visa Europe’s projected financial performance, identified synergies expected to be realized upon combination of the entities and our price-to-earnings ratio.

F-6

On the date of the restructuring, the fair value of the put option will be recorded as a long-term liability in the Company’s financial statements. Thereafter, this liability will be carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in the statement of operations similar to the treatment required by SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and reclassified as a short-term liability when it becomes exercisable within one year.

F-7

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Visa International:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Visa International and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members’ equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement Schedule II. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Visa International and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California

June 11, 2007

F-8

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30,
	2006		2005
	(In thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	705,806	$	476,964
Trading assets		80,964		73,182
Investment securities, available-for-sale		1,210		9,267
Settlement due from members		459,998		448,712
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $2,681 and $2,155 for 2006 and 2005, respectively		59,538		58,687
Member collateral		275,278		288,811
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		86,396		82,599
Current portion of deferred income taxes, net		36,501		30,613
Total current assets		1,705,691		1,468,835
Premises and equipment, net		162,617		173,179
Investments in real estate joint ventures		22,019		21,917
Intangibles, net		47,424		52,928
Long-term deferred income taxes, net		15,826		7,617
Other assets		58,962		43,480
Total assets	$	2,012,539	$	1,767,956
Liabilities and Members’ Equity
Trade and accrued taxes payable	$	59,446	$	49,857
Settlement due to members		444,416		443,190
Member collateral		275,278		288,811
Accrued compensation and benefits		152,852		153,922
Accrued and other liabilities		383,519		212,394
Total current liabilities		1,315,511		1,148,174
Long-term debt		39,929		39,904
Other liabilities		50,819		44,432
Total liabilities		1,406,259		1,232,510
Commitments and contingencies—refer to Note 19
Members’ Equity
Accumulated net income		605,415		535,660
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net		865		(214	)
Total members’ equity		606,280		535,446
Total liabilities and members’ equity	$	2,012,539	$	1,767,956

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-9

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004(1)
	(In thousands)
Operating Revenues
Service fees	$	455,301		$	453,633		$	471,175
International service revenues		427,232			359,075			423,913
Data processing fees		245,319			206,489			322,791
Other revenues		134,703			128,233			193,910
Total operating revenues		1,262,555			1,147,430			1,411,789
Operating Expenses
Personnel		317,003			309,219			392,906
Affiliates services		212,144			183,511			245,543
Premises, equipment and software		105,245			104,130			140,837
Communications		33,423			31,833			52,318
Professional and consulting services		119,004			98,721			124,552
Advertising and promotion		343,922			284,973			297,989
Travel and meetings		59,275			45,530			52,564
Other expenses		52,243			32,514			50,130
Settlement risk guarantee		(150	)		(44,602	)		95
Total operating expenses		1,242,109			1,045,829			1,356,934
Operating income		20,446			101,601			54,855
Non-operating income, net		78,511			40,469			12,852
Income before provision for income taxes		98,957			142,070			67,707
Provision for income taxes		29,202			58,869			35,418
Net income	$	69,755		$	83,201		$	32,289

(1) Fiscal 2004 include results of the EU region for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2004 prior to the EU region’s incorporation on July 1, 2004.

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-10

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ EQUITY

	Accumulated Net Income		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Members’ Equity
	(In thousands)
Balance at September 30, 2003	$	420,170	$	1,252		$	421,422
Net income		32,289		—			32,289
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		237			237
Balance at September 30, 2004		452,459		1,489			453,948
Net income		83,201		—			83,201
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		—		(1,703	)		(1,703	)
Balance at September 30, 2005		535,660		(214	)		535,446
Net income		69,755		—			69,755
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		1,079			1,079
Balance at September 30, 2006	$	605,415	$	865		$	606,280

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
	(In thousands)
Net Income	$	69,755		$	83,201		$	32,289
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Investment securities, available-for-sale
Net unrealized gains		8			1,216			474
Income tax effect		(3	)		(462	)		(180	)
Reclassification adjustment for net realized gains		(3	)		(1,760	)		(16	)
Income tax effect		1			669			6
Derivative instruments
Net unrealized gains (losses)		1,417			(5,977	)		(1,508	)
Income tax effect		(527	)		2,271			573
Reclassification adjustment for net realized losses		310			3,774			1,432
Income tax effect		(124	)		(1,434	)		(544	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		1,079			(1,703	)		237
Comprehensive income	$	70,834		$	81,498		$	32,526

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-11

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
	(In thousands)
Operating Activities
Net income	$	69,755		$	83,201		$	32,289
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		38,045			32,986			45,861
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investments, net of distributions		(8,146	)		(3,864	)		(2,667	)
Change in value of settlement risk guarantee		(150	)		(44,616	)		—
Deferred income taxes		(14,935	)		16,665			25,936
Other		(1,276	)		1,319			5,535
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Settlement due from members		(11,286	)		116,691			264,128
Accounts receivable		(851	)		(2,268	)		10,514
Trading assets		(7,782	)		(4,345	)		7,144
Prepaid and other assets		(6,032	)		(24,637	)		78,330
Trade and accrued taxes payable		9,589			(9,761	)		(44,695	)
Settlement due to members		1,226			(134,978	)		(249,243	)
Accrued compensation and benefits		(1,070	)		(4,503	)		(19,401	)
Accrued and other liabilities		178,308			88,612			(165,570	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		245,395			110,502			(11,839	)
Investing Activities
Investment securities, available-for-sale:
Purchases		(23,498	)		(43,334	)		(212,976	)
Proceeds from maturities and sales		31,930			144,540			132,804
Purchases of premises, equipment and software		(22,430	)		(24,287	)		(44,178	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		292			375			188
Investments in real estate joint ventures		(2,030	)		—			—
Distributions from real estate joint ventures		2,030			—			—
Purchases of non-marketable securities		(6,476	)		(6,469	)		(1,407	)
Proceeds from sales of non-marketable securities		3,629			—			—
Settlement of intercompany balances with EU upon incorporation		—			—			(20,257	)
Transfer of EU’s premises, equipment and software		—			—			68,100
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(16,553	)		70,825			(77,726	)
Financing Activities
Proceeds from short-term borrowings		1,118,586			2,184,638			1,834,724
Payments on short-term borrowings		(1,118,586	)		(2,184,638	)		(1,834,724	)
Redemption of preferred shares		—			(8,200	)		—
Payments on current portion of long-term debt		—			—			(5,000	)
Net cash used in financing activities		—			(8,200	)		(5,000	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		228,842			173,127			(94,565	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		476,964			303,837			398,402
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	705,806		$	476,964		$	303,837
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	44,300		$	37,602		$	33,101
Interest paid	$	3,699		$	4,962		$	13,094

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-12

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except as noted)

Note 1—Organization

Visa International Service Association (hereafter referred to as “Visa International” or the “Company”) is a nonstock, nonassessable Delaware membership corporation. The primary business of Visa International is to operate, expand, enhance and support a global payments system. Visa International’s primary customers are its member financial institutions participating in this network (collectively, the “members”). Worldwide policy is administered by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company has established regional Boards of Directors for its Asia Pacific (“Visa AP”) region, Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa (“Visa CEMEA”) region, and Latin America and Caribbean (“Visa LAC”) region. The regional Boards govern such matters as regional policy, development of new services, admission of new members, establishment of regional fees, authorization of expenditures and adoption of regional regulations. Visa U.S.A. Inc. (“Visa U.S.A.”), Visa Europe Limited (“Visa Europe”) and Visa Canada Association (“Visa Canada”) are separately incorporated regional group members (“incorporated regions”) of the Company and each is represented by its own Board of Directors.

On July 1, 2004, the European Union region (“EU region”) was incorporated and became Visa Europe, a group member of the Company (refer to Note 4).

In October 2006, a proposed corporate restructuring of Visa International and the separately incorporated regional group members was announced (refer to Note 24).

The Company’s consolidated financial statements presented in this report do not include the results of Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada.

Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies

Accounting principles—The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.”).

Principles of consolidation—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its majority-owned subsidiaries and, if applicable, variable interest entities in which the Company is a primary beneficiary. Minority interest is recorded for consolidated entities in which the Company owns less than 100% of the interest and represents the equity interest not owned by the Company. Upon consolidation, all significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated.

Cash and cash equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include cash and certain highly liquid investments with original maturities of ninety days or less from the date of purchase. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.

Investments—The Company uses the equity method of accounting for investments in other entities, including joint ventures, when it holds between 20% and 50% ownership in the entity or when it exercises significant influence. The equity method of accounting is also utilized for flow-through entities such as limited partnerships and limited liability companies when the investment ownership percentage is equal to or greater than 5% of outstanding ownership interests, regardless of whether the Company has significant influence over the investees. Under this method, the Company’s share of each entity’s net income or loss is included in non-operating income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company accounts for investments in entities under the historical cost method of accounting when it holds less than 20% ownership in the entity or for flow-through entities when the investment ownership is less

F-13

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

than 5%, and does not exercise significant influence. These investments consist of equity holdings in non-public companies and are recorded in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Dividends from these investments are included in non-operating income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company regularly reviews its investments for possible impairment and estimates the fair value of these investments if there have been identified events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments. The fair value estimate typically includes an analysis of the facts and circumstances of the investment, the expectations of the entity’s cash flows and capital needs, and the viability of its business model.

Investment securities, available-for-sale, are held to meet investment objectives such as liquidity management and to promote business and strategic objectives. These securities are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices. Unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheets. If the fair value of an available-for-sale investment declines below its cost and the decline is deemed to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the fair value and the cost. Net realized gains and losses are determined on a specific identification basis and are included in non-operating income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of operations. Interest and dividends, including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, are recorded in non-operating income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of operations.

Investments in variable interest entities—The Company has investment interests in various entities and has evaluated these entities for consolidation in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. If the Company is a primary beneficiary in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the entity would be included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

Settlement due from and due to members—Settlement due from and due to members reflects the Company’s operation of systems for clearing and settling member payment transactions. Settlements generally clear daily among members. However, international transactions involving foreign currency generally settle in two business days, resulting in amounts due from and due to members. The settlement amounts are stated at cost and are presented on a gross basis on the consolidated balance sheets.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—The Company’s accounts receivable balances are net of an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs ongoing risk evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and provides an estimate for uncollectible accounts. The allowance is based on historical experience, the age of the receivable, and current market and economic conditions, as well as any known trends or uncertainties related to account collectibility. Uncollectible accounts are charged against the allowance account. Because the allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate, it may be subject to adjustment if actual bad debt expense exceeds the estimated reserve.

Member collateral—The Company holds cash deposits from certain members in order to ensure their performance of settlement obligations arising from card and travelers cheque product clearings. These collateral assets are fully offset by corresponding liabilities, and both balances are presented on a gross basis on the consolidated balance sheets.

Trading assets and deferred compensation liabilities—The Company maintains short-term money market investments and other marketable securities related to certain long-term executive compensation plans. These

F-14

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

investments are classified as trading assets and are reported at fair value using quoted market prices or broker quotes. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses, interest, and dividends are included in non-operating income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of operations. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses.

The Company has deferred compensation liabilities which are indexed to certain trading assets. The offset for changes in the fair value of the trading assets related to the vested portion of the deferred compensation liabilities is recorded in personnel expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

Premises and equipment, net—Premises and equipment are recorded at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Buildings	10 to 40 years
Furniture and fixtures	2 to 10 years
Computer equipment	2 to 5 years
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of lease life or 10 years

Assets acquired under capital leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the asset category noted above. Fully depreciated assets are retained in premises, equipment and accumulated depreciation accounts until removed from service. Costs for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, while major improvements are capitalized and depreciated ratably to expense over the identified useful life.

Intangibles, net—The Company initially records intangible assets at cost and assigns a useful life to each asset. Intangible assets consist of capitalized software costs and other intangible assets, all of which have finite lives. The intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:

Capitalized software	2 to 5 years
Other	2 to 10 years

Capitalized software includes internal and external costs incurred when developing or purchasing computer software for internal use, and is capitalized in intangible assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Internal and external costs incurred during the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred until it is probable the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the intended function. Thereafter, all qualifying costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized and, upon the project being substantially completed and ready for its intended use, are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, not to exceed five years. Qualifying costs include external direct costs of materials and services consumed when developing or obtaining the applications, and payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with developing the applications. All other costs incurred in connection with software developed for internal use are expensed as incurred. The Company reviews capitalized software for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Impairment of long-lived assets—The Company evaluates long-lived assets, such as premises and equipment and finite-lived identifiable intangibles, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows

F-15

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, a charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are separately presented on the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.

Asset retirement obligations—The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations for certain leased properties. The fair value of a liability for the obligation is determined by calculating the present value of expected cash flows which will be incurred to retire the leasehold improvements. When the liability is initially recorded, the Company capitalizes the cost by increasing the related asset carrying amount. Over time, the liability is accreted to its original obligation with the accretion recorded in other operating expense, and the capitalized cost is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the related asset. When asset retirement costs change as a result of a revision to estimated cash flows, the Company adjusts the amount of asset retirement cost allocated to expense in the period of change assuming the change affects that period only, or in the period of change and future periods if the change affects more than one period as required by FASB Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Correction, for a change in estimate.

Revenue recognition—The Company’s revenue is comprised principally of service fees, international service revenues, data processing fees and other revenues. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104), and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21) where applicable. Revenue is recognized when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed, and collectibility of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

Service fees predominantly represent payments by members with respect to their card programs carrying marks of the Visa brand. Service fees are based principally upon spending on Visa branded cards for goods and services as reported on member quarterly operating certificates. Current quarter service fees are assessed using a calculation of pricing applied to prior quarter volumes.

International service revenues are generated when cardholders purchase goods and services in transactions where the cardholder’s issuer country is different from the merchant’s acquirer country. The fees from these cross-border transactions are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are performed.

Data processing fees represent user fees for authorization, clearing, settlement, and other maintenance and support services that facilitate transaction and information processing among the Company’s members globally. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.

Other revenues consist of card recovery bulletin fees, product enhancements, risk-related penalty charges, initial membership fees and revenues from certain regional development programs. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.

The Company has agreements with certain members to provide card, volume and support incentives. These incentives are accrued based on management’s estimate of the members’ performance according to provisions in the agreements. Card, volume and support incentives are recorded as reductions to revenue in the same period as the related revenue is earned.

Advertising and promotion costs—The costs of media advertising are expensed when the advertising takes place. Production costs are expensed as incurred.

F-16

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Income taxes—The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. A valuation allowance is recorded for the portions that are not expected to be realized based on the level of historical taxable income, projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the temporary differences are deductible, and allowable tax planning strategies.

Pension and postretirement plans—The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension and postretirement plans in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, SFAS No. 88, Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, and SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. The plans are actuarially evaluated, which includes the use of several assumptions. Critical assumptions for qualified pension plans include the discount rate and the expected rate of return on plan assets, which are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. Other assumptions involve demographic factors such as retirement, mortality, turnover and the rate of compensation increases. The Company evaluates assumptions annually and modifies the assumptions as appropriate.

The Company uses a discount rate to determine the present value of its future benefit obligations. The discount rate is based on matching the duration of other corporate bond pools to the expected benefit payment stream.

To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, the Company considers the current and expected assets allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. Any difference between actual and expected plan experience, including asset return experience in excess of the 10% corridor around the larger of assets or liabilities, is recognized in the net periodic pension calculation over the expected average employee future service, approximately 9 years for United States plans and approximately 14 years for United Kingdom plans. The gains and losses of certain smaller nonqualified pension plans are recognized immediately in the year in which they occur.

The Company immediately recognizes a net settlement loss for previously unrecognized losses when it makes substantial excess pension plan payments.

Foreign currency—For each of the Company’s foreign operations, the functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are converted to U.S. dollars at the spot rate on the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-U.S. currencies are remeasured to U.S. dollars using current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-U.S. currencies are maintained at historical U.S. dollar exchange rates.

Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are a result of the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. Transaction gains and losses are recognized currently in earnings in other expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

Derivative financial instruments—The Company uses options and forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce the exposure to foreign currency rate changes on non-functional currency denominated forecasted

F-17

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

operating expenses and operating revenues. Net recognized foreign currency assets and liabilities are hedged with forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce the risk that earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company accounts for its derivative and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value of derivative instruments are accounted for depending on whether they are designated and qualify for hedge accounting. Fair value represents the difference in the value of the contracts at the contractual rate and the current forward price, and generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date based on broker quotes for the same or similar instruments.

Warrants received in connection with equity investments in companies are considered derivative financial instruments if they can be net settled. These warrant securities are not designated as hedging instruments, and are included in other assets at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in other non-operating income (expense), net, during the period of change. Fair value is estimated using a standard option pricing model.

Guarantees and indemnifications—A liability is recognized upon the issuance of certain guarantees and indemnifications, including the ongoing obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of the guarantee. The liability is measured at its fair value, with changes in fair value included in settlement risk guarantee and other expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

Legal and other loss contingencies—The Company is currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings. The Company periodically reviews the status of each significant matter and assesses the potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the Company accrues a liability for the estimated loss. Where a liability is probable and there is a range of estimated loss with no best estimate in the range, the Company records the minimum estimated liability related to the claim. As additional information becomes available, the Company reassesses the potential liability related to the Company’s pending claims and legal proceedings and revises its estimate.

Use of estimates—The preparation of the accompanying financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include valuation of investments, capitalized software, pension and postretirement costs, incentives for card issuance and acceptance, volume and support, legal contingencies, guarantees and indemnifications, and deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and assumptions.

Reclassifications—Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years’ balances in order to conform to fiscal 2006 presentation.

Note 3—Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (“AJCA”). FSP No. 109-2 provides accounting and disclosure guidance with respect to the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer as provided for in the AJCA. The Company completed the evaluation of the

F-18

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

repatriation provision under this Act in fiscal 2006 and determined that it would not repatriate any foreign earnings under this provision. FSP No. 109-2 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143. FIN 47 clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligation,” as used in SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligation, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. Accordingly, an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The Company adopted FIN 47 on October 1, 2005. The adoption of FIN 47 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FSP No. 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments, which provides guidance on determining when investments in certain debt and equity securities are considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. FSP No. 115-1 and 124-1 also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. FSP No. 115-1 and 124-1 is required to be applied to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted FSP No. 115-1 and 124-1 on January 1, 2006. The adoption of FSP No. 115-1 and 124-1 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It establishes a probability threshold of greater than 50% to satisfy the requirement to recognize a tax benefit. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is in the process of determining the effect, if any, of adopting FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, which amends SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 106 to require recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the balance sheet. Under SFAS No. 158, gains and losses, prior service costs and credits, and any remaining transition amounts that have not yet been recognized through net periodic benefit cost will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax effects, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic cost. In addition, the measurement date, the date at which the benefit obligation and plan assets are measured, is required to be the Company’s fiscal year end. SFAS No. 158 is effective for non-public companies for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007, except for the measurement date provisions, which are effective for fiscal years ending after

F-19

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

December 15, 2008. The Company plans to adopt both the balance sheet recognition provision and measurement date provision of SFAS No. 158 at September 30, 2007, which represents an early adoption of the measurement date provision. Accordingly, for the balance sheet recognition provision, with respect to the Company’s portion of pension and postretirement plans at September 30, 2007, the after-tax impact of adopting SFAS No. 158 is expected to reduce members’ equity by approximately $19.2 million and $11.4 million for the United States and United Kingdom plans, respectively. For the measurement date provision, for the Company’s portion of the United States pension and post-retirement plans at September 30, 2007, the Company is expected to record an after-tax charge of approximately $2.8 million to member’s equity in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. The United Kingdom plans currently have measurement dates of September 30, and therefore no change in measurement date is required for those plans. These estimates are actuarially calculated based on current assumptions for the plans, and assume that there will be no modifications, amendments or other significant changes to the plans. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This statement allows entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and other items at fair value. In addition, SFAS No. 159 includes an amendment of SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 159 could have on its consolidated financial statements, if any.

Note 4—Incorporation of EU Region

In October 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors passed a resolution approving the incorporation of the EU region and its admission as a regional group member of the Company. Actual incorporation was subject to favorable tax rulings and no adverse financial effects on the Company. Final Board approval was granted and the EU region was separately incorporated in Delaware on July 1, 2004 as Visa Europe Services Inc. (“VESI”). Upon incorporation, the members within the EU region of Visa International Service Association gave up their membership in the Company and became direct members of Visa Europe, a newly formed United Kingdom private limited company. VESI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Visa Europe.

F-20

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Upon incorporation, the Company transferred all of the assets and liabilities of the EU region to VESI. No gain or loss was recorded as a result of this transaction. A summary of the EU region balance sheet at June 30, 2004 is as follows:

	June 30, 2004
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,794
Accounts receivable and other current assets		78,654
Premises, equipment and intangibles, net		84,284
Other assets		42,742
Total assets	$	216,474
Liabilities and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accrued and other current liabilities	$	152,413
Other liabilities		63,103
Total liabilities		215,516
Accumulated other comprehensive income		958
Total liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income	$	216,474

The consolidated balance sheets of the Company at September 30, 2006 and 2005 do not reflect balances of Visa Europe.

The consolidated statement of operations of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2004 reflects the following amounts related to the EU region:

	Year Ended September 30, 2004(1)
Operating revenues	$	386,630
Visa International fees		(96,028	)
Operating expenses		(283,862	)
Non-operating expenses, net		(4,477	)
Income before income taxes	$	2,263

(1) Fiscal 2004 reflects the nine-month period ended June 30, 2004 prior to the EU region’s incorporation.

In October 2001, the Company entered into a twenty-year lease agreement for premises to be occupied by the EU region and Visa CEMEA. As of July 1, 2004, the entire lease was assigned to VESI with the Company acting as a guarantor to the landlord as required by United Kingdom property law under the existing lease. In the event of a default by VESI, the Company is obligated to make lease payments. The base rent commitment is £7.5 million each year or $14.0 million in U.S. dollars (based on the September 30, 2006 exchange rate). Rent is allocated based on the square footage occupied by the tenants and was 81.1% for VESI and 18.9% for Visa CEMEA at September 30, 2006 and 2005. VESI agreed to reimburse the Company for any liabilities that may arise under the Company’s guarantee to the landlord. The estimated value of this guarantee at September 30, 2006 is $0.2 million.

F-21

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Note 5—Visa Affiliates

Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada are separately incorporated regional group members of Visa International. The results of their operations are not consolidated with those of the Company. The Company provides global brand management, global product enhancements, management of global system development and interoperability, and corporate support to all three group members. Compensation for these services is based on fees ratified by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company is a party to numerous agreements with these Visa affiliates which allow each company to provide services to the other at negotiated fees. The Company earned total fees from these affiliates for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 as follows:

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Service fees
Visa U.S.A.	$	159,264	$	168,455	$	196,297
Visa Europe(1)		108,022		117,060		33,482
Visa Canada		14,225		15,066		16,212
Total service fees	$	281,511	$	300,581	$	245,991
Data processing fees
Visa U.S.A.	$	2,645	$	2,392	$	2,246
Visa Europe(1)		2,068		1,946		410
Visa Canada		196		181		149
Total data processing fees	$	4,909	$	4,519	$	2,805
Total fees	$	286,420	$	305,100	$	248,796

(1) Fiscal 2004 reflects revenue for the three month period after the incorporation of the EU region on July 1, 2004.

Total fees from Visa U.S.A. represented 12.8%, 14.9% and 14.1% of Visa International’s total operating revenues for fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively. Other than Visa U.S.A., no other member accounted for more than 10% of Visa International’s total operating revenues during fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004.

The Company has agreements with Inovant LLC, a majority-owned subsidiary of Visa U.S.A., for processing worldwide transactions and other services, primarily related to system development in support of Visa branded products and services. The Company also has agreements for services rendered by Visa U.S.A. and Visa Europe, primarily related to system development in support of Visa branded products and services at negotiated fees. Total expenses for these services, recorded as affiliates services on the consolidated statements of operations, were $212.1 million, $183.5 million and $245.5 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Included in affiliates services for fiscal 2005 is a reduction of expense totaling $12.3 million for a one-time pricing related settlement from Inovant LLC.

The Visa CEMEA region is a party to numerous agreements with Visa Europe which allow each entity to provide services to the other at negotiated fees. One such arrangement is related to the lease agreement for premises occupied by both Visa Europe and Visa CEMEA (refer to Note 4). In fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, Visa CEMEA paid Visa Europe $9.1 million, $9.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for premises and various other services.

F-22

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Amounts due from and due to Visa affiliates are settled monthly. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had the following due from and due to Visa affiliates included in accounts receivable and accrued and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Due from Visa affiliates
Visa Europe	$	7,263	$	9,535
Visa Canada		—		107
Total due from Visa affiliates	$	7,263	$	9,642
Due to Visa affiliates
Visa U.S.A.	$	4,956	$	6,336
Inovant LLC		26,013		22,375
Visa Canada		810		—
Total due to Visa affiliates	$	31,779	$	28,711

In addition, at September 30, 2006 and 2005, other liabilities included an obligation to Visa U.S.A. for $20.0 million and $16.4 million, respectively, related to California income taxes.

The Company has an uncommitted credit facility with Visa U.S.A. whereby the Company or Visa U.S.A. may provide each other short-term financing with a maximum term of five business days. Neither the Company nor Visa U.S.A. has the obligation to lend to or to borrow from the other company. There were no outstanding balances as of September 30, 2006 or September 30, 2005 under this arrangement.

Note 6—Investments

Trading Assets and Deferred Compensation Liabilities

The Company maintains its trading assets portfolio to generate returns related to certain deferred executive compensation plans. Changes in the fair value of trading securities are included in non-operating income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of operations. Changes in the fair value of the vested portion of the deferred compensation liabilities are recorded in personnel expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. The deferred compensation liabilities, included in accrued compensation and benefits, were $70.4 million and $67.5 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The dividends, net realized gains and net unrealized gains from trading assets for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Dividends	$	3,220	$	1,858	$	960
Net realized gains		1,956		1,745		663
Net unrealized gains		989		2,251		973
Total	$	6,165	$	5,854	$	2,596

F-23

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Available-for-Sale Investments

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

	September 30, 2006
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized				Fair Value
			Gains		Losses
Marketable equity securities	$	—	$	1,210	$	—	$	1,210
	September 30, 2005
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized				Fair Value
			Gains		Losses
U.S. agency debt securities	$	8,100	$	3	$	—	$	8,103
Marketable equity securities		—		1,164		—		1,164
Total	$	8,100	$	1,167	$	—	$	9,267

At September 30, 2005, available-for-sale investments in U.S. agency debt securities had maturities of greater than three months but less than one year.

For the year ended September 30, 2006, the realized gain recognized was not significant. There were $0.7 million and $1.4 million of realized gains recognized for the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. There were no realized losses recorded in any of the three years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

There were no investment securities in continuous gross unrealized loss positions for greater than twelve months at September 30, 2006, 2005 or 2004.

Other Investments

At September 30, 2006 and 2005, investments accounted for under the cost and equity methods were $68.6 million and $57.1 million, respectively. There have been no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments during the year ended September 30, 2006, and accordingly, an estimate of the fair value of any investment was not required.

At September 30, 2006 and 2005, investments accounted for under the equity method (“nonconsolidated affiliates”) were $47.3 million and $38.8 million, respectively. These investments include $22.0 million and $21.9 million of investments in real estate joint venture affiliates at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for which summarized financial information is provided in Note 9.

At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company holds a 16% ownership interest in Inovant LLC, a subsidiary of Visa U.S.A. The carrying value of the investment in Inovant LLC was $19.4 million and $11.6 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Equity earnings from the investment in Inovant LLC were $7.9 million, $9.1 million and $4.6 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

F-24

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Summarized financial information of Inovant LLC was as follows:

Summarized Balance Sheets Data

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Current assets	$	238,299	$	177,233
Other assets		80,234		71,477
Total assets	$	318,533	$	248,710
Current liabilities	$	156,525	$	136,201
Other liabilities		39,941		41,555
Total liabilities	$	196,466	$	177,756

Summarized Statements of Operations Data

	For the years ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Operating revenues	$	860,683	$	844,698	$	761,626
Operating expenses	$	809,052	$	791,187	$	717,423
Net income	$	51,343	$	54,983	$	44,303

The Company periodically evaluates its cost and equity method investments for accounting treatment in accordance with FIN 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had investments in three and four companies, respectively, that were identified as variable interest entities. The Company was not the primary beneficiary of any of these entities and as such no consolidation was required, although it did have a significant variable interest in one entity. This entity is involved in the development of processing services for smart cards in Egypt. The Company’s variable interests in this entity at September 30, 2006 consisted of an equity investment and a lease guarantee and were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, the lease guarantee was terminated and this, together with other transactions and events, led to a reconsideration of the status of the entity with the conclusion that it no longer satisfied the criteria of a variable interest entity.

Note 7—Premises and Equipment, Net

Premises and equipment, net, at September 30, 2006 and 2005 consisted of the following:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Land	$	22,133	$	22,133
Buildings		120,496		119,677
Furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements		56,189		59,473
Computer equipment		73,900		79,392
Total premises and equipment		272,718		280,675
Less: accumulated depreciation		110,101		107,496
Premises and equipment, net	$	162,617	$	173,179

F-25

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Depreciation expense associated with premises and equipment was $24.6 million, $24.2 million and $37.7 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Note 8—Intangible Assets, Net

Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets, net, at September 30, 2006 and 2005 consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2006
	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
Capitalized software	$	88,764	$	41,548	$	47,216
Other		6,111		5,903		208
Total	$	94,875	$	47,451	$	47,424
	September 30, 2005
	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
Capitalized software	$	81,290	$	28,433	$	52,857
Other		5,911		5,840		71
Total	$	87,201	$	34,273	$	52,928

Capitalized software includes both purchased and internally developed software.

Amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangible assets was $13.4 million, $8.7 million and $8.2 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

At September 30, 2006, estimated future amortization expense on finite-lived intangible assets was as follows:

Years Ending September 30,	Estimated Future Amortization Expense
2007	$	20,577
2008		16,930
2009		9,774
2010		106
2011		37
Thereafter		—
Total	$	47,424

F-26

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Note 9—Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures

The Company and Visa U.S.A. invest in real estate joint ventures that own, develop, lease and operate certain facilities and properties used jointly by the Company, Visa U.S.A. and Inovant LLC. The following represents the Company’s investments in the joint ventures at September 30, 2006 and 2005:

	Ownership Percentage		September 30,
			2006		2005
Visa Resources	50.0	%	$	2,162	$	2,016
Visa Land Management, Inc.	50.0	%		367		352
Visa Land Management II, Inc.	50.0	%		165		156
Visa Land Development I, L.P.	49.5	%		10,673		10,012
Visa Land Development II, L.P.	49.5	%		8,652		9,381
Total			$	22,019	$	21,917

Visa Resources, a California General Partnership, manages and invests in or leases premises and equipment used jointly by the Company, Visa U.S.A. and Inovant LLC. Visa Land Management, Inc. and Visa Land Management II, Inc. manage the interests of Visa Land Development I, L.P. (“VLD I”) and Visa Land Development II, L.P. (“VLD II”), respectively, in owned real estate. The Company also owns two buildings in the San Francisco Bay Area which are leased on a month-to-month basis to Visa Resources to manage as additional space for the Company, Visa U.S.A. and Inovant LLC. The total lease payments by Visa Resources to the Company for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $15.0 million, $14.9 million and $15.2 million, respectively, and are included in non-operating income, net, on the consolidated statements of operations.

Summarized combined financial information of the real estate joint ventures was as follows:

Combined Balance Sheets

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Current assets	$	14,422	$	14,419
Premises and equipment, net		84,055		86,468
Other assets		1,176		1,093
Total assets	$	99,653	$	101,980
Current liabilities	$	6,616	$	5,632
Other liabilities		1,679		1,519
Debt		46,930		50,605
Equity		44,428		44,224
Total liabilities and equity	$	99,653	$	101,980

F-27

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Combined Statements of Operations

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Total revenues	$	81,912	$	84,327	$	86,800
Total expenses		81,654		84,139		86,605
Income before taxes	$	258	$	188	$	195

Current liabilities of the combined real estate joint ventures include $2.3 million and $1.5 million of amounts payable to the Company at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and are included in accounts receivable on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

The combined debt of VLD I and VLD II was $46.9 million and $50.6 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The two notes bear interest at 8.28% and 7.83% and mature in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Interest expense on the outstanding notes for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $4.1 million, $4.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

The following table presents future debt payments:

Years Ending September 30,	Future Debt Payments
2007	$	4,070
2008		4,410
2009		4,779
2010		5,178
2011		5,611
Thereafter		23,586
Total		47,634
Less: unamortized debt issuance & other costs		704
Total debt	$	46,930

Visa Resources charges the combined costs of facilities, equipment and other shared services to the Company, Visa U.S.A. and Inovant LLC, based on an agreed-upon methodology. For the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company was allocated $10.7 million, $12.4 million and $13.4 million of these expenses, respectively. These amounts are included in premises, equipment and software expense on the consolidated statement of operations, and represented 17.0%, 18.9% and 19.9% of total expenses allocated by Visa Resources for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

F-28

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Visa Resources has commitments to non-Visa affiliates for operating leases relating to office facilities and equipment. At September 30, 2006, combined total future minimum lease payments under these non-cancelable operating leases with original terms of more than one year were as follows:

Years Ending September 30,	Future Minimum Lease Payments
2007	$	3,442
2008		2,082
2009		2,071
2010		2,083
2011		2,120
Thereafter		177
Total lease commitments	$	11,975

Note 10—Other Assets and Liabilities

Other Assets

Other assets at September 30, 2006 and 2005 consisted of the following:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Cost and equity method investments	$	27,100	$	23,593
Investment in Inovant LLC (equity method)		19,436		11,568
Annuity contracts		2,914		1,319
Other		9,512		7,000
Total	$	58,962	$	43,480

Accrued and Other Liabilities

Accrued and other liabilities at September 30, 2006 and 2005 consisted of the following:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Accrued marketing expenses and member incentives	$	292,094	$	137,898
Accrued operating expenses		48,088		35,996
Due to Visa affiliates		31,779		28,711
Settlement risk guarantee		150		300
Other		11,408		9,489
Total	$	383,519	$	212,394

F-29

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Other Liabilities

Other long-term liabilities at September 30, 2006 and 2005 consisted of the following:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Employee benefits	$	25,307	$	23,634
Note payable to Visa U.S.A. related to California income taxes		20,013		16,384
Annuity contracts		2,926		1,319
Asset retirement obligations		2,114		1,558
Other		459		1,537
Total	$	50,819	$	44,432

Note 11—Non-Operating Income, Net

Non-operating income, net, for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 consisted of the following:

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
Interest income	$	24,469		$	14,120		$	5,249
Interest expense		(5,162	)		(7,545	)		(11,096	)
Dividend income		28,738			7,800			1,103
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investments, impairment charges and other gains, net		9,666			5,437			798
Trading assets income		6,165			5,854			2,596
Losses on sale of assets		(371	)		(83	)		(1,011	)
Real estate rental income		15,006			14,886			15,213
Total	$	78,511		$	40,469		$	12,852

Note 12—Debt

U.S. Commercial Paper Program

The Company maintains a U.S. commercial paper program to support its working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes. This program allows the Company to issue up to $500.0 million of unsecured debt securities, with maturities up to 270 days from the date of issuance and at interest rates generally extended to companies with comparable credit ratings. As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had no outstanding obligations under this program.

Revolving Credit Facilities

The Company maintains certain revolving credit facilities. The participating lenders in these revolving credit facilities include certain of the Company’s members or affiliates of the Company’s members. These revolving credit facilities are maintained to provide liquidity in the event of settlement failures by the Company’s members, to back up the commercial paper program and, in the case of the three-year facility, for general corporate purposes.

F-30

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

At September 30, 2006, the Company’s revolving credit facilities consisted of the following:

	Maximum Allowed Borrowing Under Credit Facility		Expiration Date
364-day facility	$	1,200,000	October 2006
Three-year facility	$	300,000	October 2007
Incremental facility		*	*

* Under the terms of the 364-day credit agreement, Visa International may request up to three activations of an incremental facility up to a maximum principal amount of $500 million with a maximum expiration date in October 2006. Once activated, the incremental facility is a committed credit facility until the expiration date granted by the lenders. The incremental facility was not activated as of September 30, 2006.

Interest rates on the revolving credit facilities are determined at the option of the Company by either an alternative base rate or by a ratings-based pricing grid which uses the Company’s senior unsecured long-term debt rating as assigned by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service. Interest is assessed at various conventional reference rates plus applicable margins. Facility and other fees associated with the revolving credit facilities were in the aggregate $1.5 million, $2.1 million, and $1.6 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The credit facilities contain certain covenants and events of default, including financial covenants related to consolidated accumulated net income and other indebtedness, both of which are calculated and reported quarterly. During the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company was in compliance with all covenants with respect to the revolving credit facilities.

As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, there were no borrowings under the revolving credit facilities.

In October 2006, the Company extended the expiration date of the Company’s then existing $1.2 billion 364-day revolving credit facility to December 5, 2006. In November 2006, the Company entered into a new agreement (the “November 2006 agreement”) for a $1.45 billion 364-day revolving credit facility and a $500.0 million incremental facility, both with expiration dates in November 2007. The new credit facilities replaced the $1.2 billion credit facility. Under the terms of the November 2006 agreement, Visa International may request up to three activations of the incremental facility up to a maximum principal amount of $500 million with a maximum expiration date in November 2007. Once activated, the incremental facility is a committed credit facility until the expiration date granted by the lenders. The incremental facility was activated at inception in November 2006, and the commitments under the current incremental facility expire, and any loans thereunder mature, on June 15, 2007. Visa International may make two additional incremental facility activation requests until November 18, 2007.

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt at September 30, 2006 and 2005 consisted of the following:

	September 30,
	2006			2005
Medium-term notes—maturing August 2009; fixed interest rate of 7.53%; payable semi-annually	$	40,000		$	40,000
Unamortized discount and debt issuance cost		(71	)		(96	)
Long-term debt	$	39,929		$	39,904

F-31

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The Company established a medium-term note program in 1992 to offer up to $250.0 million of unsecured private placement notes. The notes may be issued with maturities from nine months to thirty years at fixed or floating interest rates. No medium-term notes were issued in fiscal 2006 or 2005.

Interest expense on the outstanding notes for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $3.0 million, $3.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively.

Note 13—Settlement Guarantee Management

Each member is responsible for settlement of transactions with other members. However, under the Company’s corporate bylaws, the Company indemnifies members for settlement loss suffered due to the failure of any other member to honor Visa cards and travelers cheques processed in accordance with its Operating Regulations.

Settlement losses are initially borne by the Company and may subsequently be recovered from the region where the member has its principal place of business. Annually, each region is responsible for losses up to $1.0 million plus 0.003% of its total volume for the fiscal year preceding the loss. Losses in excess of this amount are allocated among all regions in proportion to each region’s percentage of worldwide total volume. As a result, the Company receives a partial indemnification from its separately incorporated regional group members—Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe—for worldwide losses in excess of the loss sharing allocation.

The Company’s indemnification with respect to members’ settlement losses creates settlement risk for the Company, due to the difference in timing between the date of a payment transaction and the date of subsequent settlement. The term and amount of the indemnification are unlimited. Settlement risk is estimated using the average daily card volumes during the quarter multiplied by the estimated number of days to settle, and the total balance for outstanding travelers cheques. The Company’s worldwide maximum estimated settlement exposure, after consideration of the collateral amounts set forth below, amounted to approximately $45.0 billion and $40.0 billion at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. No material loss related to settlement risk was incurred for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

To manage the settlement risk under this indemnification and the resulting risk to all members, a formalized set of credit standards has been approved by the Visa International Board of Directors. If a member fails to meet any of the credit standards, it is subject to risk control measures such as collateral or trust arrangements. The Company also provides protection to members and merchants who have incurred losses as a result of counterfeit travelers cheques. The Company retains insurance coverage for such losses in excess of $1.0 million to a maximum of $5.0 million.

F-32

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Member Collateral

To reduce potential losses related to settlement risk, the Company requires certain members to post collateral in order to ensure their performance of settlement obligations arising from card and travelers cheque product clearings. The separately incorporated regional group members of the Company maintain similar collateral requirements for their members. The type of collateral is based on Board-approved standards that include cash equivalents, letters of credit, guarantees and securities. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company held collateral for its members as follows:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Cash equivalents	$	276,513	$	344,496
Letters of credit		384,249		271,470
Guarantees		387,390		419,776
Securities		2,000		2,000
Total collateral	$	1,050,152	$	1,037,742

Approximately $275.3 million and $288.8 million of cash equivalents are classified as both an asset and corresponding liability on the consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Settlement Risk Guarantee

The fair value of the settlement risk guarantee is estimated using a proprietary model. Key inputs to the model include statistically derived loss factors based on historical experience, estimated settlement exposures at period end and a standardized grading process for members and country exposures. The model is independently reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to capture recent characteristics of the membership, historical loss experience, and changes in Visa International’s global risk policies and procedures.

During 2005, the Company recorded a $44.6 million reduction in its settlement guarantee obligation with a corresponding reduction to expense as a result of management’s review of the loss model. Specifically, the historical loss factors utilized in the model were reduced as a result of the Company’s low loss history and sustained performance under its global risk policies and procedures. Furthermore, management concluded that it had experienced sufficient economic cycles, loss events and economic incidents to utilize the updated loss factors in its fair value determination, thereby resulting in the reduction in the fair value of the guarantee obligation. As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, the value of the settlement risk guarantee was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Note 14—Retirement and Other Employee Benefit Plans

Substantially all of the Company’s employees are covered by various contributory and noncontributory benefit plans. The major plans are described below.

United States Plans

The Company sponsors jointly with Visa U.S.A. a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan, which provides retirement benefits for substantially all of its employees in the United States. Pension plan expense was accrued as actuarially determined under the projected unit credit method. The benefits are based upon years of

F-33

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

service, age and the employee’s final three years of earnings or, in the case of employees hired after September 30, 2002, the employee’s final five years of earnings. The pension plan assets are invested in pooled and mutual funds. The Company uses a June 30^th measurement date for pension and postretirement benefits. Information presented herein reflects this measurement date. The last actuarial valuation for this pension plan was made on June 30, 2006.

The Company made an amendment to its pension plan, effective November 1, 2003. The amendment limits the maximum leave period that may be taken into account for pension benefit purposes to twenty-four months in aggregate. This amendment did not have a material impact on the Company’s pension liability.

The Company also participates jointly with Visa U.S.A. in a postretirement plan that provides postretirement medical benefits to its retirees and dependent spouses in the United States who meet the minimum age and service requirements. Benefits are provided from the retirement date until the retiree reaches age sixty-five. Retirees must contribute on a monthly basis for the same coverage that is generally available to active employees and their dependents. The Company’s contributions are funded on a current basis.

For the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company made substantial excess pension plan payments and, as a result, was required to recognize its proportionate share of previously unrecognized losses through settlement accounting as defined in SFAS No. 88, Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits. The Company’s portion of pension plan payments and net settlement loss were recorded in personnel expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and are summarized below:

	Year Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Plan Payments
Total excess pension plan payments	$	5,250	$	11,362	$	33,674
Visa International’s portion of excess pension plan payments	$	1,479	$	2,354	$	11,527
Settlement Loss
Total excess pension plan net settlement loss	$	3,108	$	12,490	$	37,502
Visa International’s portion of excess pension plan net settlement loss	$	1,330	$	3,546	$	12,035

F-34

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The following tables provide an aggregate reconciliation of the benefit obligations, plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the financial statements related to the pension plan and the postretirement plan of Visa International and Visa U.S.A.:

	Measurement Date June 30,
	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Changes in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation—beginning of year	$	714,968		$	601,160		$	67,125		$	58,067
Service cost		74,025			62,369			6,755			6,027
Interest cost		41,164			40,902			3,621			3,919
Actuarial (gains) losses		(93,901	)		80,216			(480	)		1,948
Settlements		2,124			6,853			—			—
Benefit payments		(77,958	)		(76,532	)		(2,938	)		(2,836	)
Benefit obligation—end of year	$	660,422		$	714,968		$	74,083		$	67,125
Accumulated pension benefit obligation	$	487,939		$	451,135		$	—		$	—
Change in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets—beginning of year	$	493,538		$	416,138		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		39,257			27,968			—			—
Employer contributions		59,561			125,964			2,938			2,836
Benefit payments		(77,958	)		(76,532	)		(2,938	)		(2,836	)
Fair value of plan assets—end of year	$	514,398		$	493,538		$	—		$	—
Funded Status
Funded status—end of year	$	(146,024	)	$	(221,430	)	$	(74,083	)	$	(67,125	)
Unrecognized prior service cost		7,363			8,374			(16,321	)		(20,980	)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss		141,661			257,217			25,203			27,688
Employer contributions between measurement date and end of year		461			4,771			932			735
Net amounts recognized—end of year	$	3,461		$	48,932		$	(64,269	)	$	(59,682	)
Visa International’s portion of (accrued) prepaid benefit	$	(720	)	$	10,828		$	(13,444	)	$	(13,026	)

Assumptions used, on a weighted-average basis, to develop the projected benefit obligation for the plans were as follows:

	Measurement Date June 30,
	Pension Benefits				Postretirement Benefits
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Discount rate	6.2	%	5.3	%	6.2	%	5.0	%
Rate of increase in compensation levels	5.5	%	5.5	%	—		—

F-35

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Net periodic pension and other postretirement cost for the plans included the following components:

	Pension Benefits									Postretirement Benefits
	Years Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004			2006			2005			2004
Service cost	$	74,025		$	62,369		$	62,057		$	6,755		$	6,027		$	5,759
Interest cost		41,164			40,902			35,937			3,621			3,919			3,249
Expected return on plan assets		(36,133	)		(30,539	)		(25,086	)		—			—			—
Amortization of:
Prior service cost		1,011			1,011			1,011			(4,659	)		(4,659	)		(4,659	)
Actuarial loss		17,317			11,197			12,879			1,804			1,851			1,878
Net periodic pension cost		97,384			84,940			86,798			7,521			7,138			6,227
Additional settlement charges		3,108			12,490			37,502			—			—			—
Total net benefit cost	$	100,492		$	97,430		$	124,300		$	7,521		$	7,138		$	6,227
Visa International’s portion of net periodic pension cost	$	21,953		$	20,267		$	20,523		$	1,367		$	1,389		$	1,195
Visa International’s portion of additional settlement charges	$	1,330		$	3,546		$	12,035		$	—		$	—		$	—

Assumptions used, on a weighted-average basis, to develop the net periodic pension and postretirement cost of the plans were as follows:

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	Years Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004		2006		2005		2004
Discount rate	5.3	%	6.3	%	6.0	%	5.0	%	6.3	%	6.0	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets	7.5	%	7.5	%	7.5	%	—		—		—
Rate of increase in compensation levels	5.5	%	5.5	%	5.5	%	—		—		—

The expected rate of return on plan assets is primarily based on long-term historical risks and returns associated with each asset class within the portfolio. The expected return is weighted based on a target allocation and results in a long-term return rate of 7.5%.

The pension plan’s target and actual strategic asset allocations at September 30, 2006 and 2005 by asset category were as follows:

Asset Class	Target Allocation		Permissible Range				Actual Allocation
			Minimum		Maximum		2006		2005
Equity securities	65	%	50	%	80	%	68	%	68	%
Fixed income securities	30	%	25	%	35	%	30	%	30	%
Other	5	%	—		7	%	2	%	2	%
Total	100	%					100	%	100	%

Plan assets are managed with a long-term perspective to ensure that there is an adequate level of assets to support benefit payments to participants over the life of the pension plan. Plan assets are managed by external investment managers. Investment management performance is benchmarked for each asset base. An independent

F-36

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

consultant assists the Company with investment manager selections and performance evaluations. Plan assets are broadly diversified to mitigate the risk of significant losses. The other asset category includes U.S. cash equivalents that are held to meet the liquidity needs of the plan.

The Company’s funding policy is to contribute, annually, an amount between the minimum required and the maximum deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The following table presents the actual contributions made by the Company from its employer assets for fiscal 2006 and 2005 and the expected contributions for fiscal 2007 under its pension plan and postretirement plan:

	Pension Plan				Postretirement Plan
	Total Plan Contributions		Visa International’s Portion		Total Plan Contributions		Visa International’s Portion
Actual employer contributions
Fiscal 2006	$	59,561	$	12,398	$	2,938	$	951
Fiscal 2005	$	125,964	$	31,999	$	2,836	$	951
Expected employer contributions
Fiscal 2007	$	51,000	$	10,700	$	3,700	$	1,100

The following table presents estimated future benefit payments:

	Pension Plan				Postretirement Plan
	Total Payments		Visa International’s Portion		Total Payments		Visa International’s Portion
Expected benefit payments
2007	$	55,800	$	12,400	$	3,700	$	1,100
2008	$	62,800	$	12,600	$	4,600	$	1,300
2009	$	71,000	$	15,300	$	5,500	$	1,400
2010	$	76,400	$	15,000	$	6,500	$	1,600
2011	$	83,800	$	16,000	$	7,300	$	1,600
2012-2016	$	488,400	$	96,600	$	47,700	$	9,300

For the postretirement plan, the assumed annual rate of future increases in per capita cost of health benefits was 7.0% in 2006; the rate is assumed to decrease to 6.0% by 2007 and remain at that level thereafter. These trend rates reflect management’s and actuaries’ expectations of future rates. The health care cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one percentage point increase or decrease in assumed health care cost trend rates would have had the following effects:

	Effects on Total Postretirement Plan			Visa International’s Portion
Increase of one percentage point in health care cost trend rate
Effect on total service and interest costs	$	398		$	72
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation	$	1,121		$	211
Decrease of one percentage point in health care cost trend rate
Effect on total service and interest costs	$	(342	)	$	(62	)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation	$	(987	)	$	(187	)

F-37

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

United Kingdom (“UK”) Plans

The Company participates in various qualified and nonqualified defined benefit plans, which provide retirement and death benefits for the Company’s employees residing in the United Kingdom. Calculation of pension plan expense is similar to the United States plan. Regular plan benefits are determined based on years of service, age and the employee’s highest average eligible salary for any three consecutive years during the last ten years of employment. Pension plan assets are invested in pooled funds. The last formal actuarial valuation for this pension plan was made on October 1, 2004. The projected benefit obligation at September 30, 2006 was based on the October 1, 2004 actuarial valuation, adjusted to reflect assumptions based on market conditions as of September 30, 2006.

As a result of the Visa Europe incorporation in July 2004, the Visa UK pension plan was amended to segregate Visa Europe employees from Visa CEMEA employees. A Deed of Amendment (“Deed”) was filed on October 1, 2004. The Deed establishes two sections and defines how the membership within each section is determined as well as how the assets and liabilities are allocated between Visa Europe and the Company. Each section had a separate formal actuarial valuation effective October 1, 2004 to assess the value of the related liabilities and assets. The Deed allows the trustees to consider whether the current investment strategy for each section is appropriate and to make changes. This means that different strategies were in place for the two sections beginning in fiscal 2005.

In December 2004, the segregation of the UK pension plan between Visa Europe and Visa CEMEA was completed and a final assessment was made to allocate the assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2004. Accordingly, the fiscal 2006 and 2005 balances (included herein) reflect Visa CEMEA only.

F-38

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The following tables provide an aggregate reconciliation of the benefit obligations, plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to the qualified and nonqualified retirement plans:

	September 30,
	2006			2005
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation—beginning of year	$	57,554		$	46,193
Service cost		3,889			3,451
Interest cost		3,127			2,737
Amendments		—			750
Actuarial (gains) losses		(130	)		6,214
Benefit payments		(362	)		(301	)
Foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses)		3,739			(1,490	)
Benefit obligation—end of year	$	67,817		$	57,554
Accumulated pension benefit obligation	$	51,697		$	44,319
Change in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets—beginning of year	$	38,793		$	30,106
Actual return on plan assets		3,711			5,399
Employer contribution		4,271			4,577
Benefit payments		(362	)		(301	)
Foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses)		2,616			(988	)
Fair value of plan assets—end of year	$	49,029		$	38,793
Funded Status
Funded status—end of year	$	(18,788	)	$	(18,761	)
Unrecognized prior service cost		16			73
Unrecognized actuarial loss, net		17,904			19,135
Net amounts recognized—end of year	$	(868	)	$	447
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Prepaid benefit cost	$	7,954		$	8,190
Accrued benefit liability		(8,822	)		(7,743	)
Net amounts recognized—end of year	$	(868	)	$	447

Assumptions used to develop the projected benefit obligation were as follows:

	September 30,
	2006		2005
Discount rate—qualified	5.0	%	5.0	%
Discount rate—nonqualified	5.0	%	5.0	%
Rate of increase in compensation levels—qualified	4.5	%	4.5	%
Rate of increase in compensation levels—nonqualified	5.5	%	5.5	%

F-39

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Net periodic pension cost included the following components:

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
Service cost	$	3,889		$	3,451		$	14,933
Interest cost		3,127			2,737			8,804
Expected return on plan assets		(2,736	)		(2,449	)		(9,422	)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost		47			807			240
Actuarial loss		1,003			565			5,585
Lump sum risk premiums		326			332			509
Net periodic pension cost	$	5,656		$	5,443		$	20,649
Visa CEMEA’s portion of net periodic pension cost	$	5,656		$	5,443		$	6,032

Assumptions used to develop the net periodic pension cost were as follows:

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Discount rate—qualified	5.0	%	5.5	%	5.5	%
Discount rate—nonqualified	5.0	%	5.5	%	5.5	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets	7.0	%	7.0	%	7.0	%
Rate of increase in compensation levels—qualified	4.5	%	4.5	%	4.0	%
Rate of increase in compensation levels—nonqualified	5.5	%	5.5	%	5.0	%

The expected rate of return on plan assets is primarily based on the long-term historical risks and returns associated with each asset class within the portfolio. The expected return is weighted based on a target allocation and results in a long-term return rate of 7.0%.

The pension plan’s weighted-average asset allocations at September 30, 2006 and 2005 by asset category were as follows:

Asset Class	Target Allocation		Permissible Range				Actual Allocation
			Minimum		Maximum		2006		2005
Equity securities	45	%	40	%	50	%	54	%	56	%
Fixed income securities	45	%	40	%	50	%	35	%	36	%
Other	10	%	5	%	15	%	11	%	8	%
Total	100	%					100	%	100	%

Plan assets are managed with a long-term perspective to ensure that there is an adequate level of assets to support benefit payments to participants over the life of the pension plan. The goal of the trustee is to manage the asset classes so that they are within 5% of the target allocation. The target asset allocation is a long-term objective that the pension plan will achieve over the next several years. The investment subcommittee of the trustee reviews the asset allocation on a quarterly basis.

F-40

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The Company’s funding policy is to contribute, annually, an amount between the minimum required and the maximum deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The following table presents the actual benefit payments and contributions made by the Company from its employer assets for fiscal 2006 and 2005 and the expected contributions for fiscal 2007 under its pension plan:

	Total Pension Plan Contributions
Actual employer contributions
Fiscal 2006	$	4,271
Fiscal 2005	$	4,577
Expected employer contributions
Fiscal 2007	$	4,100

The following table presents estimated future benefit payments:

	Pension Plan Payments(1)
Expected benefit payments
2007	$	400
2008	$	500
2009	$	500
2010	$	600
2011	$	600
2012-2016	$	4,200

(1) Converted to U.S. dollars at the September 30, 2006 exchange rate.

Other Plans

The Company sponsors jointly with Visa U.S.A. the Visa Thrift Plan, a defined contribution plan which covers substantially all of its employees in the United States. Contributions to this plan are funded on a current basis, and the expenses are recognized in the period in which the related payroll expenses are incurred. Personnel expenses attributable to the Company’s employees under this plan were $6.2 million, $5.8 million and $6.7 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2004, the Company made several amendments to its defined contribution plan. The Company reduced employer matching while increasing the maximum covered pay percentage of employee contributions. The Company eliminated the minimum service requirement for participation in the plan and accelerated the vesting period from five years to three years. Finally, the Company eliminated the credited service requirement for rehired employees.

The Company has a nonqualified excess thrift plan and other retirement plans for certain employees. Related costs recorded in personnel expenses were $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

F-41

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Note 15—Income Taxes

The Company’s income before taxes for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 consisted of the following components:

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
U.S.	$	32,883	$	82,485	$	42,388
Non-U.S.		66,074		59,585		25,319
Total income before taxes	$	98,957	$	142,070	$	67,707

The Company’s income tax expense for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 consisted of the following:

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
Current
U.S. federal	$	37,006		$	45,969		$	8,038
U.S. state and local		4,695			413			61
Non-U.S.		2,290			(4,178	)		1,383
Total current tax expense		43,991			42,204			9,482
Deferred
U.S. federal		(10,344	)		10,987			19,326
U.S. state and local		(463	)		5,678			6,610
Non-U.S.		(3,982	)		—			—
Total deferred tax (benefit) expense		(14,789	)		16,665			25,936
Total income tax expense	$	29,202		$	58,869		$	35,418

F-42

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The tax effect of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at September 30, 2006 and 2005 are presented below:

	September 30,
	2006			2005
Deferred Tax Assets
Deferred compensation	$	27,521		$	32,818
Retirement plans		14,362			12,050
Accrued expenses		12,549			3,320
Strategic investments		6,236			5,059
Foreign taxes		3,799			—
Other		9,840			6,520
Gross deferred tax assets		74,307			59,767
Valuation allowance		(575	)		—
Total deferred tax assets		73,732			59,767
Deferred Tax Liabilities
Premises, equipment and software		(15,254	)		(18,727	)
Prepaid expenses		(5,284	)		(2,797	)
State taxes		(339	)		(177	)
Unrealized gains on investments		(528	)		164
Total deferred tax liabilities		(21,405	)		(21,537	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	52,327		$	38,230

The increase in the net deferred tax assets of $14.1 million was due to various temporary differences including the computation of foreign deferred tax assets during 2006.

The valuation allowance of $0.6 million as of September 30, 2006 related to the California capital loss carryforwards. The California capital loss carryforward period is 5 years. As such, the capital loss carryforwards will expire during fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 through September 30, 2010. With the exception of the aforementioned, the Company’s gross deferred tax asset is appropriately stated at a level which management believes is more likely than not to be realized in the future, primarily from the generation of future taxable income.

F-43

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The differences between the Company’s effective tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory rate, expressed as a percentage of income before taxes, for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2004
Statutory rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
State taxes, net of federal benefit	2.8	%	0.4	%	6.2	%
Effect of California ruling	(7.5	)%	16.9	%	—
Meals and entertainment	1.3	%	0.7	%	2.3	%
Non-U.S. tax effect, net of federal benefit	1.2	%	(3.1	)%	6.6	%
Reassessment of tax reserves	(9.8	)%	(7.6	)%	—
Strategic organizational costs	6.9	%	—		2.2	%
Other	(0.4	)%	(0.9	)%	—
Effective tax rate	29.5	%	41.4	%	52.3	%

The difference in the effective tax rate between 2006 and 2005 results primarily from a favorable resolution of a portion of a California audit and the reassessment of federal tax reserves partially offset by certain non-deductible expenditures incurred in connection with various strategic organizational matters in 2006.

The difference in the effective tax rate between 2005 and 2004 results primarily from the expected resolution of a California audit relating to the application of a previously issued state ruling, foreign tax refunds received, and the favorable resolution of a federal income tax audit during 2005.

Income taxes payable of $10.2 million and $14.4 million were included in trade and accrued taxes payable on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets for the years ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Cumulative undistributed earnings of the Company’s international subsidiaries amounted to $7.1 million as of September 30, 2006, all of which are intended to be permanently reinvested. These earnings have been provided for in income tax expense as the distributions are deemed to have occurred under the U.S. tax code.

Note 16—Derivative Financial Instruments

The functional currency for Visa International is the U.S. dollar (“USD”). The Company transacts business in USD and in various foreign currencies. This activity subjects the Company to exposure from movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s policy is to enter into foreign exchange forward and option derivative instruments to manage the variability in expected future cash flows of certain foreign currency denominated revenues and expenses attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. These derivative instruments are denominated in the foreign currency in which the exposures are denominated. All derivative instruments outstanding at September 30, 2006 and 2005 have maturities of less than 16 months and 23 months, respectively. The Company does not use foreign currency option or foreign exchange forward contracts for speculative or trading purposes. All derivatives are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value in other current assets or accrued and other liabilities and the resulting gains or losses from changes in fair value are accounted for depending on whether the derivative is designated as either a cash flow or balance sheet hedge.

F-44

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company enters into forward and option contracts to hedge certain operational (“cash flow”) exposures resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Such cash flow exposures result from portions of forecasted revenues and expenses denominated in currencies other than USD.

To qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment, the Company formally documents, at inception of the hedge, all relationships between hedging transactions and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company also formally assesses (at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of cash flows of the hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, on the consolidated balance sheets. When the forecasted transaction occurs and is recognized in earnings, the amount in other comprehensive income (loss), net related to that hedge is reclassified to operating revenue or expense. The balance accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss), net was not significant at September 30, 2006 and the Company expects to reclassify the entire amount to earnings during fiscal 2007 and 2008 due to the recognition in earnings of the hedged forecasted transactions.

During fiscal 2006, the Company changed its methodology for effectiveness testing and measurement from including to excluding time value. The excluded time value will be reported immediately in operating revenue or expenses depending on the underlying hedged item. For the year ended September 30, 2006, the amount recorded in earnings related to excluded time value was immaterial.

The Company assesses effectiveness prospectively using regression analysis and retrospectively using a dollar ratio test. Because time value is excluded from effectiveness, the effectiveness tests are performed on the foreign exchange forward and option contracts based on changes in the spot rate of the derivative instrument compared to changes in the spot rate of the forecasted hedged transaction. In the event there is recognized ineffectiveness or the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur within the designated hedge period or it becomes remote that the forecasted transaction will occur, the related gains and losses on the cash flow hedges are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net on the consolidated balance sheets to other expense on the consolidated statement of operations at that time. For the year ended September 30, 2006, there were no gains or losses recognized in other expense due to measurable ineffectiveness, failure of an effectiveness assessment or the discontinuance of cash flow hedge accounting.

Balance Sheet Hedges

The Company uses forward rate contracts to economically hedge certain non-functional currency liabilities to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These forward contracts are not designated for hedge accounting. The change in fair value of these derivatives is recorded in other expense and offsets the change in fair value of the underlying foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.

F-45

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The following table provides information about the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts at September 30, 2006 and 2005:

	Estimated Fair Value at September 30, 2006
	USD Notional		Gain (Loss)			Average Rate
Cash Flow Hedges
Forward Contracts
Buy British pound	$	50,569	$	(389	)	1.8825
Balance Sheet Hedges
Forward Contracts
Buy British pound	$	3,973	$	132		1.8062

	Estimated Fair Value at September 30, 2005
	USD Notional		Gain (Loss)			Average Rate
Cash Flow Hedges
Forward Contracts
Buy British pound	$	71,885	$	(1,938	)	1.8149
Buy euro	$	3,509	$	(45	)	1.2313
Balance Sheet Hedges
Forward Contracts
Buy British pound	$	3,159	$	61		1.7303

The Company’s derivative financial instruments are subject to both credit and market risk. Credit risk is the risk of loss due to failure of a counterparty to perform its obligations in accordance with contractual terms. Market risk is the potential change in an investment’s value caused by fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, credit spreads or other variables. The Company monitors the credit-worthiness of the financial institutions that are counterparties to its derivative financial instruments and does not consider the risks of counterparty nonperformance to be material. Notwithstanding the Company’s efforts to manage foreign exchange risk, there can be no assurance that its hedging activities will adequately protect against the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations. Credit and market risks (as a result of an offset by the underlying cash flow being hedged) related to derivative instruments were not considered significant at September 30, 2006 and 2005.

Note 17—Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments as reported on the consolidated balance sheets:

Cash and cash equivalents, settlement due from and due to members, accounts receivable, other current assets, member collateral, trade payables, and accrued and other liabilities—The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short period of time to maturity.

Investments classified as available-for-sale, trading assets and foreign currency forward contracts—The fair value is based on quoted market prices.

F-46

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Debt—The fair value is estimated based on current interest rates available to the Company for debt instruments with similar terms, degrees of risk and remaining maturities. The carrying value of the Company’s debt was $39.9 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005. The estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was $42.4 million and $43.2 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Note 18—Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company extends credit to its affiliated and non-affiliated members. Collection of trade receivables may be affected by changes in economic or other industry conditions and may, accordingly, impact the Company’s overall credit risk. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had receivables from Visa Europe that represented approximately 12.2% and 16.4% of total accounts receivable, net, respectively. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s total accounts receivable, net, at September 30, 2006 or 2005.

The Company also has significant concentration risk related to its guarantees on potential uncollateralized member settlement losses. Refer to Note 13 for additional discussion.

Cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments included short-term investments in debt securities consisting of high credit-quality instruments. The Company has policies and procedures that limit the amount of credit exposure in any one financial institution or type of investment instrument.

Note 19—Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

The Company’s future minimum payments on non-cancelable leases and marketing and other agreements, excluding payments to Visa Resources, at September 30, 2006 were as follows:

Years Ending September 30,	Leases		Marketing and Other		Total
2007	$	16,481	$	81,977	$	98,458
2008		8,496		32,122		40,618
2009		4,551		27,849		32,400
2010		3,001		20,804		23,805
2011		2,659		19,151		21,810
Thereafter		29,790		21,001		50,791
Total	$	64,978	$	202,904	$	267,882

The Company leases certain premises and equipment throughout the world under non-cancelable operating and capital leases with varying expiration dates. The Company’s rent expense on operating leases, excluding rents paid to Visa Resources (refer to Note 9), was $19.9 million, $20.6 million and $32.3 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company has one capital lease for equipment. The net present value of minimum lease payments on the capital lease approximates book value. Imputed interest expense and accrued interest for the capital lease are not considered material.

In March 2006, the Company entered into an eight-year agreement to sponsor the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup, commencing in January 2007. On December 6, 2006, a trial court in

F-47

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

New York granted MasterCard Incorporated (MasterCard) injunctive relief against FIFA, with the effect of awarding the FIFA sponsorship contemplated in the Visa-FIFA agreement to MasterCard instead. FIFA has appealed the court’s decision, which appeal is currently pending. Until this MasterCard-FIFA litigation is finally resolved or the Company otherwise resolves the matter as between itself and FIFA, the Company’s rights and obligations under the Visa-FIFA agreement are not certain. The contractual payments under the agreement total $180.0 million over the eight-year term of the agreement and are payable in annual installments. The payment which was due in January 2007 has been temporarily delayed by agreement with FIFA. No related payments are included in the table above. Visa may realize financial and other remedies from FIFA in the event that FIFA is unable to perform under the Visa sponsorship agreement as a result of the MasterCard litigation.

The Company leases premises in which, at the expiration of the lease, the Company will incur certain restoration costs such as the cost to remove leasehold improvements. The Company also owns certain computer equipment for which disposal costs will be incurred upon retirement. The carrying amounts of these asset retirement obligations were $2.7 million and $1.8 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Activities related to the asset retirement obligations during the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:

	Years Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2004
Changes in Asset Retirement Obligations
Asset retirement obligations—beginning of year	$	1,766		$	1,582		$	5,410
Obligations incurred		1,022			291			15
Accretion expense		66			32			254
Retirements		(132	)		(139	)		(81	)
Transferred to Visa Europe		—			—			(4,016	)
Asset retirement obligations—end of year	$	2,722		$	1,766		$	1,582
Less: current portion		608			208			302
Non-current asset retirement obligations	$	2,114		$	1,558		$	1,280

Contingencies

The Company has incentive agreements with members and other organizations for various programs designed to increase card issuance and acceptance, build payments volume and increase other Visa branded transactions. These card, volume and support incentives are earned by members based on their performance over the term of the incentive agreement, which may range from one to seven years, and are recognized as a reduction of revenue in the same period as the related revenues are earned, based on management’s estimate of the members’ performance as compared to the terms of the incentive agreement. The agreements are generally cancelable by Visa International. Excluding anticipated revenue to be earned from higher payments and transaction volumes in connection with these agreements, the expected reduction of future earnings in the next seven years resulting from these agreements is estimated to be a maximum of $426.5 million as of September 30, 2006.

Note 20—Legal Matters

Visa International is a party to various legal and regulatory proceedings. These proceedings involve complex claims that are subject to substantial uncertainties and unspecified damages and the probability of loss

F-48

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

and an estimation of damages are not possible to ascertain at present. Accordingly, Visa International has not established reserves for these legal and regulatory proceedings. In addition, under Visa International’s membership agreement with Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s operating regulations, Visa International believes it is indemnified against losses with respect to certain legal and regulatory proceedings pertaining to U.S. operations. If Visa International is not successful in its defense of any of these legal and regulatory proceedings, or if Visa U.S.A. does not meet its indemnification obligations or does not have adequate financial resources to fully indemnify Visa International, the Company could incur judgments or fines or enter into settlement of claims that could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Rule 2.10(e) Litigation

American Express/Discover

On October 4, 2004, Discover Financial Services, Inc. (Discover) filed an action against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and MasterCard Incorporated (MasterCard) in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On November 15, 2004, American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (American Express) filed a similar action in the same court against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard, and certain of their member financial institutions. Both complaints seek treble damages and injunctive relief under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, asserting that Visa’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s Competitive Programs Policy (CPP) prevented banks from issuing payment cards on the American Express and Discover networks. Discover also contends that Visa’s “Honor All Cards” rule reinforced the anticompetitive effects of bylaw 2.10(e).

Both lawsuits have been assigned to the district court judge who presided in United States v. Visa (the DOJ Case), in which the Department of Justice challenged bylaw 2.10(e) and the CPP. In the DOJ Case, the court in 2001 enjoined Visa and MasterCard from enacting, enforcing, or maintaining any bylaw, rule, policy, or practice that prohibits members from issuing general purpose or debit cards on any other general purpose card network. In accordance with this court order, Visa U.S.A. repealed bylaw 2.10(e). The court has deferred ruling on whether, or to what extent, it will give collateral estoppel effect in the American Express and Discover cases to factual findings made in the DOJ Case.

The defendants moved to dismiss certain claims in the American Express and Discover cases. In the fall of 2005, the court granted MasterCard and Visa International’s motions to dismiss Discover’s attempted monopolization and monopolization claims against them, because Discover did not allege that either MasterCard or Visa International individually had sufficient market share to maintain these claims. The court denied Visa U.S.A.’s analogous motion, however, finding that Discover had alleged sufficient market share as to Visa U.S.A. The court also denied Visa and MasterCard’s motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ debit card claims, ruling that the plaintiffs had properly alleged a debit card market. Visa’s motion to dismiss American Express’s exclusive-dealing claim was also denied.

At a hearing on April 25, 2007, the District Court for the Southern District of New York set a trial date of September 9, 2008 for both the American Express and Discover cases. The court also established deadlines and procedures for motions practice and expert discovery.

On June 7, 2007, Discover filed a Second Amended Complaint, which eliminated allegations related to the “Honor All Cards” rule, dropped attempted monopolization and monopolization claims against MasterCard and Visa International to conform to the court’s rulings on motions to dismiss, and made technical changes to names of the plaintiffs.

F-49

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Attridge

On December 8, 2004, a purported consumer class action was filed against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and MasterCard in California state court (Attridge). The complaint asserted claims under California’s Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Law, based in part on Visa’s former bylaw 2.10(e). According to the complaint, Visa violated California’s unfair competition law by barring members from issuing American Express and other competing cards. Plaintiff further alleged that this action reduced competition at the card and network level and increased the price of general purpose card network services, resulting in less valuable products at higher prices than would have prevailed in a competitive market. Plaintiff seeks restitution, injunctive relief, interest and attorneys’ fees. In May 2006, the court dismissed the Cartwright Act claim. On October 4, 2006, the court approved a plan for initial discovery, which is now proceeding. No trial date has been set.

Interchange Litigation

Multidistrict Litigation Proceedings

In fiscal 2005 and 2006, approximately fifty lawsuits—most of which were asserted as purported class actions—were filed on behalf of merchants who accept payment cards against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard, and other defendants. Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated federal and state antitrust laws by setting interchange rates (among other claims, as described below). The suits seek treble damages for alleged overcharges in merchant discount fees, as well as injunctive and other relief.

On October 19, 2005, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order establishing a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in the Eastern District of New York. The Honorable John H. Gleeson was assigned to coordinate pretrial proceedings in the cases transferred to the MDL. On April 24, 2006, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed, which supersedes the class action complaints filed previously. One additional class action was filed after the date of the consolidated class complaint; it has been conditionally transferred to MDL 1720 but has not yet been made part of the consolidated class. Visa U.S.A. is a defendant in the consolidated class action complaint and nine additional complaints filed on behalf of individual plaintiffs.

The consolidated class action complaint alleges that the setting of interchange violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act; that Visa’s “no surcharge” rule and other alleged Visa rules violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act; and that the rules and interchange together constitute monopolization, violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act and California’s Cartwright Act. The consolidated class action complaint further asserts that Visa ties “Payment Guarantee Services” and “Network Processing Services” to “Payment Card System Services” and engages in exclusive dealing, both in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and that offline debit interchange violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act and California’s Cartwright Act.

The individual complaints include similar claims and also allege that Visa impermissibly ties services for “Premium Credit Cards” to services for other Visa branded payment cards.

On June 9, 2006, Visa answered the consolidated class action complaint and moved to dismiss in part, or strike, claims for pre-January 1, 2004 damages. The parties are currently engaged in document production, written discovery, and non-substantive depositions. No trial date has been set.

F-50

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Retailers’ Litigation

“Indirect Purchaser” Actions

Forty so-called “indirect purchaser” actions have been filed against Visa and MasterCard in nineteen states and the District of Columbia. In these actions, the plaintiffs purport to represent classes of residents of one or more states who purchased goods at merchants that accepted Visa- or MasterCard-branded payment cards. They claim to have paid higher prices as a result of the purported “tying” and other alleged anti-competitive conduct. The plaintiffs assert claims under state antitrust statutes, state consumer protection statutes, and common law. Visa International is named as a defendant in only six of the cases, all filed in California, asserting claims against Visa International under the Cartwright Act and Section 17200 of the California Business and Professions Code.

In the California cases, consolidated before the Superior Court for the State of California in the City and County of San Francisco, Visa filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings based on California Proposition 64, which limits a plaintiff’s standing to bring claims under Section 17200. After oral argument, the court denied Visa’s motion on March 6, 2007. The California Court of Appeal rejected a petition seeking immediate review of that decision on June 7, 2007.

Currency Conversion Litigation

State Litigation

In February 2000, an action (Schwartz) was filed in the Superior Court for the State of California in Alameda County against Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard International under California Business and Professions Code Section 17200. The complaint sought injunctive relief and restitution in connection with Visa’s and MasterCard’s practice of charging United States issuers a 1% “currency conversion fee” on certain credit transactions made in a foreign currency.

In May 2004, a case against Visa International, Visa U.S.A. Inc. and MasterCard International (Shrieve) was filed in the California State Court for Alameda County alleging claims similar to Schwartz, but related to the 1% “currency conversion fee” imposed on foreign debit card transactions by U.S. cardholders.

In December 2004, a consumer class action complaint (Baker) was filed in the San Diego County Superior Court for the State of California against Visa International and Visa U.S.A. The complaint challenges the disclosure of the rates used by Visa to convert currency for foreign transactions. Plaintiffs sought restitution and injunctive relief. In January 2006, plaintiffs amended their complaint to add additional claims and expand the proposed class to include all cardholders, worldwide, for whom Visa has converted currencies.

In February 2005, a consumer class action complaint (Mattingly) was filed in the Superior Court for the State of California against Visa International and Visa U.S.A. for failure to disclose the 1% “currency conversion fee” when a U.S. cardholder purchased goods or services in a foreign currency after October 2002.

Federal Multidistrict Litigation (MDL)

More than seventeen federal purported class action lawsuits filed in Philadelphia, New York, Chicago and San Francisco against Visa International, Visa U.S.A., MasterCard and various member banks were consolidated into a single suit before Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the defendants’ respective currency conversion processes violated federal antitrust statutes and that the bank-

F-51

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

defendants’ disclosures to cardholders violated the requirements of the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and Regulation Z.

Currency Conversion Settlement

On July 20, 2006, the parties executed a settlement agreement to resolve all federal MDL and state claims, including those on appeal. Under the agreement, the defendants collectively will pay $336.0 million to create a settlement fund to pay monetary claims by eligible cardholders, the costs of administering the settlement and notice to cardholders, and any court-approved fees and expenses to attorneys for the class and awards to the class representatives. Visa’s portion of the settlement fund is $100.1 million. Visa and MasterCard will pay an additional $32.0 million to resolve the claims in the Schwartz matter; Visa’s share is $18.6 million. The settlement agreement also includes provisions relating to disclosures on billing statements and other documents. The settlement is not expected to have a material impact on Visa International’s financial position or results of operations. The settlement agreement has been preliminarily approved by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Parke Litigation

On June 27, 2005, a purported merchant and consumer class action was filed in California state court against Visa International, Visa U.S.A., MasterCard, Merrick Bank, and CardSystems Solutions, Inc. (Parke). The complaint alleges that Visa’s failure to inform cardholders of a security breach at CardSystems Solutions, Inc. in a timely manner constitutes an unlawful and/or unfair business practice under California’s Unfair Competition Law and violates California privacy law. The court denied the plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order, except with respect to the defendants’ retention of affected account-identifying information, and for a preliminary injunction. In September 2005, the court dismissed the claims brought by the merchants, and on November 18, 2005, the defendants answered the remaining claims.

CardSystems Solutions, Inc. filed for bankruptcy in United States District Court for the District of Arizona in May 2006. The Parke plaintiffs removed the case to United States District Court for the Northern District of California on August 10, 2006 and then sought to transfer the case to federal court in Arizona. Visa and MasterCard moved for remand to state court. On October 11, 2006, the court granted the defendants’ motion for remand and denied the plaintiffs’ motion to transfer the case.

Morgan Stanley Dean Witter/Discover

This action was filed in May 2000 before the EU Commission in Brussels. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (“MSDW”), the issuer of the Discover card, challenged Visa International bylaw 2.12(b) which excludes competitor organizations from membership in Visa as anti-competitive. In July 2004, Visa International filed a reply explaining inter alia that the bylaw is pro-competitive and enhances intersystem competition. In August 2004, the Commission issued a Statement of Objections alleging that Visa International’s implementation of the rule caused a restriction of competition in the acquiring market in the UK. Visa provided its written response in December 2004. In April 2005, MSDW announced its intention to spin off the Discover card business, and in May 2005, Visa International made further submissions to the Commission in light of the impact of that event on the basis of the Commission’s case. MSDW later suggested that it may not spin off the Discover card business.

In October 2006, a settlement agreement was reached between MSDW and Visa International. This provides for the withdrawal by MSDW of the complaint to the EU Commission.

F-52

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

ATM Exchange Litigation

On November 14, 2005, ATM Exchange sued Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in United States District Court for the District of Ohio. The plaintiff asserts claims of promissory estoppel, negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent misrepresentation, alleging that Visa’s “deferment” of a deadline for meeting heightened ATM data encryption testing and approval standards harmed the plaintiff by reducing demand for its ATM upgrade solution.

The parties have engaged in written discovery, party and third-party depositions, and expert discovery. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International anticipate filing dispositive motions in the case by June 29, 2007. Trial is tentatively scheduled for September 2007.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Safeclick

An Iowa company called Safeclick LLC (“Safeclick”) filed suit against Visa International and Visa U.S.A. Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on December 30, 2003. Safeclick alleged that the “Verified by Visa” program, which authenticates the identity of a cardholder in an on-line transaction, infringes two claims of Safeclick’s “Electronic Transaction Security System” patent. Safeclick sought damages under a royalty theory, as well as injunctive relief.

On December 14, 2005, the Court granted the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. On January 11, 2006, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit challenging the grant of Summary Judgment.

On October 23, 2006, the Court of Appeals denied plaintiff’s motion and ruled that the District Court had properly granted the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. On November 2, 2006, the parties entered into an agreement to allow this judgment to become final without seeking any further amendment or appeal thus terminating the plaintiff’s case.

Starpay

On May 8, 2003, Starpay and VIMachine sued Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, claiming that Visa used information provided to it by Starpay in 2000 to create Verified by Visa (“VbV”) and to file a Visa patent application on the technology underlying VbV. Two claims are asserted: infringement of VIMachine’s patent and misappropriation of Starpay’s trade secrets. In February 2006, each party filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation on claims construction. Once the court rules on those objections and finalizes the claims construction, a case schedule will be set for the remainder of discovery and trial.

Cryptography Research, Inc.

In September of 2004, Cryptography Research, Inc. (“CRI”) filed a lawsuit against Visa International in U.S. District Court in California alleging breach of contract, misrepresentation and patent infringement. The lawsuit arises from a 1998 license agreement between CRI and Visa International pursuant to which Visa International received the right to sublicense certain CRI technology for use in smart cards. After the license agreement was terminated, CRI claimed that Visa International was obligated to pay per-card royalties on certain

F-53

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

smart cards. In addition, CRI has alleged that Visa International has infringed certain patents claimed by CRI. Discovery in this matter is currently ongoing. A patent claims construction hearing was held on November 8 and 9, 2005. On October 19, 2006, the parties received the first of the eight pending claims construction orders. Fact discovery is ongoing.

On December 11, 2006, CRI filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint adding claims for breach of fiduciary duty and violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and California Unfair Competition laws. The court granted this motion on March 20, 2007 and the Second Amended Complaint was filed on March 22, 2007. Visa International filed its answer to the Second Amended Complaint and related counterclaims on April 23, 2007.

Vale Canjeable

On November 21, 2006, Vale Canjeable Ticketven, C.A., filed an action in the Fifth Municipal Court of Caracas against Todoticket 2004, C.A., and Visa International seeking a preliminary injunction preventing use of the Visa Vale mark in Venezuela. On November 29, 2006, the Fifth Municipal Court of Caracas granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting use of the “Vale” mark by Visa in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers.

In December 2006, Vale Canjeable Ticketven, C.A., also filed a claim with the Fourth Commercial Court of First Instance of Caracas alleging that the defendants infringed the plaintiff’s rights as the holder of the trademark registries and requesting that the Court: (i) declare the plaintiff is the only authorized user of the expression “Vale” in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers; (ii) prohibit the defendants from using the expression “Vale” in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers; and (iii) order the defendants to pay financial damages and legal costs. On March 21, 2007, defendants filed a motion with the Fourth Commercial Court of First Instance of Caracas asking them to revoke the preliminary injunction. The Court’s decision on this motion is pending.

Note 21—Operating Segments

SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (“SFAS 131”), establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. This standard requires segmentation based on the Company’s internal organization and reporting of revenue and operating profit. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) as defined by SFAS 131. The Company is primarily structured in geographical segments, and the CODM reviews consolidated financial information related to revenues and operating profit for each of the following three geographic segments: 1) Visa AP, 2) Visa LAC, and 3) Visa CEMEA. The CODM also reviews financial information for the headquarters division, Visa Worldwide Services (“VWS”). Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA provide products and services to their member financial institutions and generate service fees, international service revenues, data processing fees and other revenues. VWS earns service fees by charging cost-based fees to all Visa regions (including separately incorporated regions) based primarily on payments volume. In addition, VWS earns international service revenue from foreign currency exchange activities in connection with the settlement of multi-currency transactions. Non-operating income (expense), net, primarily relates to interest and dividend income from investments, real estate rental income and equity in earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries, offset by interest expense on the Company’s borrowed funds at VWS.

The reports reviewed by the CODM are based on the Company’s internal management reporting process. The presentation of information in the Company’s management reports differs from U.S. generally accepted

F-54

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) primarily due to intercompany allocations and differences in reporting classifications.

The following table provides operating segment information as reviewed by the CODM and is reconciled to the consolidated U.S. GAAP financial statements for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004:

	Visa AP		Visa LAC			Visa CEMEA			Visa EU(1)			VWS			Reclassifications			Consolidated Total
Year ended September 30, 2006
Total operating revenues	$	478,875	$	225,548		$	189,332		$	—		$	426,710		$	(57,910	)	$	1,262,555
Total operating expenses		430,434		261,096			184,036			—			414,006			(47,463	)		1,242,109
Operating income (loss)		48,441		(35,548	)		5,296			—			12,704			(10,447	)		20,446
Non-operating income, net		10,322		36,669			894			—			20,179			10,447			78,511
Income before provision for income taxes		58,763		1,121			6,190			—			32,883			—			98,957
Depreciation and amortization expenses		7,444		3,986			9,126			—			17,489			—			38,045
Equity earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries		2,459		2,832			608			—			3,229			—			9,128
Total assets		152,036		157,103			164,013			—			1,539,387			—			2,012,539
Capital expenditures		11,308		2,429			2,452			—			6,241			—			22,430
Year ended September 30, 2005
Total operating revenues		402,808		209,696			156,654			—			440,014			(61,742	)		1,147,430
Total operating expenses		401,918		178,469			148,709			—			364,050			(47,317	)		1,045,829
Operating income		890		31,227			7,945			—			75,964			(14,425	)		101,601
Non-operating income, net		6,707		12,624			192			—			6,521			14,425			40,469
Income before provision for income taxes		7,597		43,851			8,137			—			82,485			—			142,070
Depreciation and amortization expenses		7,377		4,521			6,983			—			14,105			—			32,986
Equity earnings (losses) from unconsolidated subsidiaries		2,824		2,999			(40	)		—			(30	)		—			5,753
Total assets		156,845		145,725			161,092			—			1,304,294			—			1,767,956
Capital expenditures		10,335		1,968			1,954			—			10,030			—			24,287
Year ended September 30, 2004
Total operating revenues		369,097		189,339			149,750			386,631			478,981			(162,009	)		1,411,789
Total operating expenses		360,098		186,060			145,869			379,891			438,664			(153,648	)		1,356,934
Operating income		8,999		3,279			3,881			6,740			40,317			(8,361	)		54,855
Non-operating income (expense), net		3,366		3,656			(125	)		(4,477	)		2,071			8,361			12,852
Income before provision for income taxes		12,365		6,935			3,756			2,263			42,388			—			67,707
Depreciation and amortization expenses		9,357		5,026			3,768			15,521			12,189			—			45,861
Equity earnings (losses) from unconsolidated subsidiaries		2,284		2,604			(179	)		—			(1,594	)		—			3,115
Total assets		162,004		125,582			152,764			—			1,348,832			—			1,789,182
Capital expenditures		5,339		2,722			19,643			—			16,474			—			44,178

(1) The EU region column includes the nine-month period ended June 30, 2004 prior to the EU region’s incorporation.

F-55

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Amounts in the Reclassifications column of the above table consist of the following:

	Years Ending September 30,
	2006								2005								2004
	Operating Revenue			Operating Expense			Non- operating income		Operating Revenue			Operating Expense			Non- operating income		Operating Revenue			Operating Expense			Non- operating income
Fees allocated by VWS to Visa AP, Visa LAC, Visa CEMEA and Visa Europe(1)	$	(59,400	)	$	(59,400	)	$	—	$	(57,700	)	$	(57,700	)	$	—	$	(165,400	)	$	(165,400	)	$	—
Classification of facilities income and expense		1,394			10,000			8,606		1,414			9,600			8,186		1,687			9,900			8,213
Other revenue, expense and non-operating income classifications		96			1,937			1,841		(5,456	)		783			6,239		1,704			1,852			148
Total	$	(57,910	)	$	(47,463	)	$	10,447	$	(61,742	)	$	(47,317	)	$	14,425	$	(162,009	)	$	(153,648	)	$	8,361

(1) Fiscal 2004 reflects fees of Visa Europe for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2004 prior to the EU region’s incorporation.

The Company’s operations, including revenues, expenses and long-lived assets, are managed on a regional basis and are not tracked by country. The determination of revenues and long-lived assets attributable to specific countries is not practicable and is therefore not disclosed.

Note 22—Related Parties

Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe, and Visa Canada are group members of the Company and have representation on the Company’s Board of Directors. Refer to Note 5 for information regarding transactions with these Visa affiliates.

The Company’s primary customers include member financial institutions that are also owners of the Company. Certain member financial institutions have representation on the Company’s Board of Directors, and members also have representation on the regional Boards of Directors of Visa AP, Visa LAC, and Visa CEMEA. The Company generated total operating revenues of approximately $377.8 million, $332.9 million and $316.2 million from these members for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company incurred operating expenses of $14.6 million, $11.2 million and $12.9 million for services provided by these members for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company incurred non-operating expenses of $0.8 million, $1.1 million and $1.0 million from these members for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The members owed the Company approximately $16.6 million and $12.8 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Including amounts accrued under card, volume and support incentives, the Company owed these members approximately $153.3 million and $44.0 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Fees paid for services provided by members of the Boards of Directors, including expense reimbursements for attendance at board of directors meetings, totaled $5.7 million, $3.4 million and $3.2 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The Company has ownership interests in entities that transact business with the Company. The Company considers an entity to be a related party if the Company’s ownership interest in the entity exceeds 10% of the total ownership of the entity or if the investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Excluding transactions with Inovant (refer to Note 5) and the real estate joint venture affiliates (refer to Note 9),

F-56

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

the Company generated total operating revenues of approximately $26.8 million, $17.1 million and $8.0 million from these entities for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company incurred operating expenses of $2.2 million, $0.8 million and $0.5 million for services provided by these entities for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004. The Company received dividends from these entities of $28.2 million, $7.3 million and $0.6 million for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These entities owed the Company approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Including amounts accrued under card, volume and support incentives, the Company owed these members approximately $2.7 million and $0.2 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The Company also maintains banking relationships and has credit facilities (refer to Note 12) with members that have representation on the Company’s Board of Directors and regional Boards of Directors.

Note 23—Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock

At September 30, 2004, the Company maintained a 90% voting-right interest in Visa Human Resources Service (“VHRS”), a subsidiary of Visa International, which administered certain employee benefit plans and arrangements of the Company. The 10% preferred stock interest held by external parties was valued at $7.0 million, representing 7 shares at $1.0 million per share, and the preferred stock provided for cumulative dividends at a per annum rate of 7.5%, payable quarterly. During fiscal 2005, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity,” and accounted for this obligation accordingly. In September 2005, VHRS reached an agreement with the holders of the preferred stock for early redemption of the outstanding shares for $8.2 million, which included a prepayment premium of $1.2 million. The premium paid was included in non-operating income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of operations.

Note 24—Subsequent Events

Proposed Restructuring

In October 2006, Visa International and its separately incorporated regional group members (together, “Visa”) announced the intention to restructure Visa in order to create a new global corporation called Visa Inc. The restructuring and related activities are subject to approval by Visa members and review by regulatory authorities. It is anticipated that Visa Inc. will be created through a series of mergers involving Visa Canada, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International. Visa Europe will remain a membership association, owned and governed by its European member banks, and become a licensee of Visa Inc. Visa Europe will have a minority ownership interest in Visa Inc. The reorganization will result in a new stock corporation owned by former members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada. As a part of the restructuring, the board of Visa Inc. will be comprised of a majority of independent directors.

Resignation of Former Visa International President and Chief Executive Officer

In November 2006, Visa International’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Christopher Rodrigues, resigned to pursue other interests. The board of directors appointed the Company’s chief financial officer as the President and Chief Executive Officer.

Appointment of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Board of Directors of Visa Inc.

On February 12, 2007, Joseph W. Saunders was named the designated Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Visa Inc. and, on May 15, 2007, the Designated Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Visa

F-57

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Inc. Before the formation of Visa Inc., Mr. Saunders began fulfilling the responsibilities of these positions as a designated appointee of Visa Inc. and officially assumed the title of Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer upon the formation of Visa Inc.

Commitments and Contingencies

In March 2006, the Company entered into an eight-year agreement to sponsor the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup, commencing in January 2007. On December 6, 2006, a trial court in New York granted MasterCard injunctive relief against FIFA, with the effect of awarding the FIFA sponsorship contemplated in the Visa-FIFA agreement to MasterCard instead. The impact of this matter on the Company is further described in Note 19.

Schedule II

Visa International and Subsidiaries

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Accounts Receivable Allowances	Balance at Beginning of year		Additions Charged (Credited) to Expenses			Deductions1			Balance at End of Year
For the years ended September 30:
2006	$	2,155	$	829		$	(303	)	$	2,681
2005	$	3,006	$	(578	)	$	(273	)	$	2,155
2004	$	905	$	2,136		$	(35	)	$	3,006

¹ Deductions represent uncollectible accounts written off.

F-58

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS—Unaudited

	March 31, 2007		September 30, 2006
	(In thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	604,362	$	705,806
Trading assets		95,747		80,964
Investment securities, available-for-sale		1,526		1,210
Settlement due from members		487,746		459,998
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $765 and $2,681 at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively		81,916		59,538
Member collateral		304,836		275,278
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		108,777		86,396
Current portion of deferred income taxes, net		41,633		36,501
Total current assets		1,726,543		1,705,691
Premises and equipment, net		156,171		162,617
Investments in real estate joint ventures		24,252		22,019
Intangibles, net		38,519		47,424
Long-term deferred income taxes, net		17,471		15,826
Other assets		59,736		58,962
Total assets	$	2,022,692	$	2,012,539
Liabilities and Members’ Equity
Trade and accrued taxes payable	$	48,187	$	59,446
Settlement due to members		423,358		444,416
Member collateral		304,836		275,278
Accrued compensation and benefits		140,822		152,852
Accrued and other liabilities		263,495		383,519
Total current liabilities		1,180,698		1,315,511
Long-term debt		39,941		39,929
Other liabilities		51,404		50,819
Total liabilities		1,272,043		1,406,259
Commitments and contingencies—refer to Note 13
Members’ Equity
Accumulated net income		750,595		605,415
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net		54		865
Total members’ equity		750,649		606,280
Total liabilities and members’ equity	$	2,022,692	$	2,012,539

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-59

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS—Unaudited

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007		2006
	(In thousands)
Operating Revenues
Service fees	$	360,513	$	272,942
International service revenues		269,807		204,679
Data processing fees		138,152		120,256
Other revenues		90,785		54,839
Total operating revenues		859,257		652,716
Operating Expenses
Personnel		184,883		155,005
Affiliates services		96,053		95,210
Premises, equipment and software		53,143		47,541
Communications		17,579		16,083
Professional and consulting services		81,802		39,607
Advertising and promotion		152,193		133,397
Travel and meetings		24,665		25,080
Other expenses		27,148		27,633
Total operating expenses		637,466		539,556
Operating income		221,791		113,160
Non-operating income, net		32,414		21,491
Income before provision for income taxes		254,205		134,651
Provision for income taxes		109,025		79,579
Net income	$	145,180	$	55,072

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-60

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ EQUITY—Unaudited

	Accumulated Net Income		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Members’ Equity
	(In thousands)
Balance at September 30, 2005	$	535,660	$	(214	)	$	535,446
Net income		55,072		—			55,072
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		434			434
Balance at March 31, 2006	$	590,732	$	220		$	590,952
Balance at September 30, 2006	$	605,415	$	865		$	606,280
Net income		145,180		—			145,180
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		—		(811	)		(811	)
Balance at March 31, 2007	$	750,595	$	54		$	750,649

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME—Unaudited

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
	(In thousands)
Net Income	$	145,180		$	55,072
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Investment securities, available for sale:
Net unrealized gains (losses)		317			(392	)
Income tax effect		(127	)		149
Derivative instruments:
Net unrealized (losses) gains		(5,524	)		328
Income tax effect		2,210			(125	)
Reclassification adjustment for net realized losses		3,856			764
Income tax effect		(1,543	)		(290	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax		(811	)		434
Comprehensive Income	$	144,369		$	55,506

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-61

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—Unaudited

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
	(In thousands)
Operating Activities
Net income	$	145,180		$	55,072
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		21,672			16,773
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investments, net of distributions		(1,416	)		(3,845	)
Deferred income taxes		(6,236	)		(4,624	)
Gains on sale of non-marketable securities		(6,296	)		(151	)
Other		28			(42	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Settlement due from members		(27,748	)		36,988
Accounts receivable		(22,378	)		(2,688	)
Trading assets		(14,783	)		(13,613	)
Prepaid and other assets		(24,016	)		(1,455	)
Trade and accrued taxes payable		(11,259	)		49,526
Settlement due to members		(21,058	)		(76,727	)
Accrued compensation and benefits		(12,030	)		(35,508	)
Accrued and other liabilities		(119,444	)		16,682
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(99,784	)		36,388
Investing Activities
Investment securities, available-for-sale:
Purchases		—			(23,498	)
Proceeds from maturities and sales		—			31,923
Purchases of premises, equipment and software		(6,376	)		(6,056	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		44			286
Investment in real estate joint ventures		(1,000	)		(1,040	)
Distribution from real estate joint ventures		—			1,040
Purchases of non-marketable securities		(4,360	)		(1,441	)
Proceeds from sale of non-marketable securities		10,032			3,163
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(1,660	)		4,377
Financing Activities
Proceeds from short-term borrowings		267,127			919,666
Payments on short-term borrowings		(267,127	)		(919,666	)
Net cash used in financing activities		—			—
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(101,444	)		40,765
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		705,806			476,964
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	604,362		$	517,729
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	89,174		$	13,540
Interest paid	$	1,545		$	2,161

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-62

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited

(In thousands, except as noted)

Note 1—Organization

Visa International Service Association (hereafter referred to as “Visa International” or the “Company”) is a nonstock, nonassessable Delaware membership corporation. The primary business of Visa International is to operate, enhance and support a global payments system. Visa International’s primary customers are its member financial institutions participating in this system (collectively, the “members”). Worldwide policy is administered by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company has established regional Boards of Directors for its Asia Pacific (“Visa AP”) region, Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa (“Visa CEMEA”) region and Latin America and Caribbean (“Visa LAC”) region. The regional Boards govern such matters as regional policy, development of new services, establishment of regional fees, authorization of expenditures and adoption of regional regulations. Visa U.S.A. Inc. (“Visa U.S.A.”), Visa Europe Limited (“Visa Europe”) and Visa Canada Association (“Visa Canada”) are separately incorporated regional group members (“incorporated regions”) of the Company and each is represented by its own Board of Directors.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements presented in this report do not include the results of Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada.

In October 2006, Visa International and its separately incorporated regional group members (together, “Visa”) announced the intention to restructure Visa in order to create a new global corporation called Visa Inc. The restructuring and related activities are subject to approval by Visa members and review by regulatory authorities. It is anticipated that Visa Inc. will be created through a series of mergers involving Visa Canada, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International. Visa Europe will remain a membership association and become a licensee of Visa Inc. Visa Europe will have a minority ownership interest in Visa Inc. The reorganization will result in a new stock corporation owned by former members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada. As a part of the restructuring, the board of directors of Visa Inc. will be comprised of a majority of independent directors.

In February 2007, Visa International hired Joseph W. Saunders as the Executive Chairman of the board of directors of Visa Inc. and, on May 15, 2007, the designated Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc. Before the formation of Visa Inc., Mr. Saunders will begin fulfilling the responsibilities of this position as a designated appointee of Visa Inc. and will officially assume the title of Executive Chairman of the Board upon the proposed formation of Visa Inc.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reflect all adjustments, consisting primarily of normal recurring items, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s results for the interim periods presented.

The preparation of the accompanying financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in these financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates include valuation of investments, pension costs, member and marketing incentives, contingencies, guarantees and indemnifications, and deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and assumptions.

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Visa International and its subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the

F-63

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

current interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the current fiscal year. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in its Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation.

Note 3—Visa Affiliates

Visa U.S.A., Visa Europe and Visa Canada are separately incorporated regional group members of Visa International. The results of their operations are not consolidated with those of the Company. The Company provides global brand management, global product enhancements, management of global system development and interoperability, and corporate support to the separately incorporated regional group members. Compensation for these services is based on fees ratified by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company is a party to numerous agreements with these Visa affiliates which allow each company to provide services to the other at negotiated fees. The Company earned total fees from these affiliates for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 as follows:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007		2006
Service fees
Visa U.S.A.	$	86,467	$	86,166
Visa Europe		55,339		59,467
Visa Canada		8,015		7,748
Total service fees	$	149,821	$	153,381
Data processing fees
Visa U.S.A.	$	1,401	$	1,253
Visa Europe		1,073		1,015
Visa Canada		108		95
Total data processing fees	$	2,582	$	2,363
Total fees	$	152,403	$	155,744

Total fees from Visa U.S.A. represented 10.2% and 13.4% of total operating revenues for the six month ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Other than Visa U.S.A., no member accounted for more than 10% of total operating revenue during the six month ended March 31, 2007 or 2006.

Visa International has agreements with Inovant LLC, a majority-owned subsidiary of Visa U.S.A., for processing worldwide transactions and other services, primarily related to system development in support of Visa branded products and services. The Company also has agreements for services rendered by Visa U.S.A. and Visa Europe, primarily related to system development in support of Visa branded products and services at negotiated fees. Total expenses for these services, recorded as affiliates services on the consolidated statements of operations, were $96.1 million and $95.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

F-64

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Visa CEMEA is a party to numerous agreements with Visa Europe which allow each entity to provide services to the other at negotiated fees. One such arrangement is related to a twenty-year lease agreement for premises which are occupied by both Visa Europe and Visa CEMEA. Total expenses for premises and various other services provided by Visa Europe were $3.7 million and $3.5 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The Company and Visa U.S.A. invest in real estate joint ventures that own, develop, lease and operate certain facilities and properties used jointly by the Company, Visa U.S.A. and Inovant LLC. One of these entities, Visa Resources, allocated $5.4 million and $6.0 million of premises and equipment expense to the Company during the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Visa Resources also manages two buildings owned by the Company. The Company received rental income of $7.1 million and $7.4 million from Visa Resources for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in non-operating income, net, on the consolidated statements of operations.

Amounts due from and due to Visa affiliates are settled monthly. At March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, the Company had the following receivables from and payables to Visa affiliates included in accounts receivable and accrued and other liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets:

	March 31, 2007		September 30, 2006
Due from Visa affiliates
Visa Europe	$	10,180	$	7,263
Real Estate Joint Ventures		1,767		2,319
Total receivables from Visa affiliates	$	11,947	$	9,582
Due to Visa affiliates
Visa U.S.A.	$	1,839	$	4,956
Inovant LLC		20,271		26,013
Visa Canada		261		810
Total due to Visa affiliates	$	22,371	$	31,779

In addition, at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, other liabilities includes an obligation to Visa U.S.A. for $20.0 million related to California income taxes.

The Company has an uncommitted credit facility with Visa U.S.A. whereby the Company or Visa U.S.A. may provide each other short-term financing with a maximum term of five business days. Neither the Company nor Visa U.S.A. has the obligation to lend to or to borrow from the other company. There were no outstanding balances as of March 31, 2007 or September 30, 2006 under this arrangement.

In October 2001, Visa International entered into a twenty-year lease agreement for premises to be occupied by the EU region and Visa CEMEA. On July 1, 2004, upon the incorporation of the EU region as Visa Europe Services, Inc. (“VESI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Visa Europe, the entire lease was assigned to VESI with Visa International acting as a guarantor to the landlord as required by United Kingdom property law under the existing lease. In the event of a default by VESI, Visa International is obligated to make lease payments. The base rent commitment is £7.5 million each year or $14.7 million in U.S. dollars (based on the March 31, 2007 exchange rate). Rent is allocated based on the square footage occupied by the tenants and was 81.1% for VESI and 18.9% for Visa CEMEA at March 31, 2007. VESI has agreed to reimburse Visa International for any

F-65

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

liabilities that may arise under Visa International’s guarantee to the landlord. Since the inception of this arrangement, Visa International has not made any payments under this guarantee. The estimated value of this guarantee was $0.2 million at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006.

Note 4—Investments

Trading Assets and Deferred Compensation Liabilities

The Company maintains its trading assets portfolio to generate returns related to certain deferred executive compensation plans. Changes in the fair value of trading securities are included in non-operating income, net, on the consolidated statements of operations. Changes in the fair value of the vested portion of the deferred compensation liabilities are recorded in personnel expense on the consolidated statements of operations. The vested portion of deferred compensation liabilities, included in accrued compensation and benefits, was $66.8 million and $70.4 million at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.

The dividends, net realized gains and net unrealized gains from trading assets for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007		2006
Dividends	$	1,886	$	1,348
Net realized gains		1,065		1,306
Net unrealized gains		2,871		1,673
Total	$	5,822	$	4,327

Other Investments

The Company periodically evaluates its cost and equity method investments for accounting treatment in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. At September 30, 2006, Visa International had investments in three companies that were identified as variable interest entities. Visa International was not the primary beneficiary of any of these entities and as such no consolidation was required, although it did have a significant variable interest in one entity. This entity is involved in the development of processing services for smart cards in Egypt. Visa International’s variable interests in this entity at September 30, 2006 consisted of an equity investment and a lease guarantee and were not material to Visa International’s consolidated financial statements. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, the lease guarantee was terminated and this, together with other transactions and events, led to a reconsideration of the status of the entity with the conclusion that it no longer satisfied the criteria of a variable interest entity.

F-66

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Note 5—Intangible Assets, Net

Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 consisted of the following:

March 31, 2007	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
Capitalized software	$	90,110	$	52,359	$	37,751
Other		6,711		5,943		768
Total	$	96,821	$	58,302	$	38,519
September 30, 2006	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
Capitalized software	$	88,764	$	41,548	$	47,216
Other		6,111		5,903		208
Total	$	94,875	$	47,451	$	47,424

Capitalized software includes both purchased and internally developed software.

Amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangible assets was $11.0 million and $4.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

At March 31, 2007, estimated future amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets was as follows:

Fiscal Years Ending September 30,	Estimated Future Amortization Expense
2007 (remaining six months)	$	9,761
2008		17,476
2009		10,488
2010		587
2011		157
2012		50
Total	$	38,519

Note 6—Other Assets and Liabilities

Other Assets

Other assets at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2007		September 30, 2006
Cost and equity method investments	$	27,296	$	27,100
Investment in Inovant LLC (equity method)		20,047		19,436
Annuity contracts		2,873		2,914
Other		9,520		9,512
Total	$	59,736	$	58,962

F-67

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Accrued and Other Liabilities

Accrued and other liabilities at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2007		September 30, 2006
Accrued marketing expenses and member incentives	$	148,107	$	292,094
Accrued operating expenses		72,351		48,088
Payables to Visa affiliates		22,371		31,779
Settlement risk guarantee		154		150
Other		20,512		11,408
Total	$	263,495	$	383,519

Other Liabilities

Other long-term liabilities at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2007		September 30, 2006
Employee benefits	$	26,664	$	25,307
Note payable to Visa U.S.A. related to California income taxes		20,013		20,013
Annuity contracts		2,885		2,926
Asset retirement obligations		1,466		2,114
Other		376		459
Total	$	51,404	$	50,819

Note 7—Non-Operating Income, Net

Non-operating income, net, for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 consisted of the following:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
Interest income	$	14,356		$	9,681
Interest expense		(3,320	)		(3,277	)
Dividend income		574			564
Gains on sale of non-marketable securities		6,296			151
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investments, net		1,571			2,848
Trading assets income		5,822			4,327
Real estate rental income		7,132			7,406
Losses on sale of assets		(17	)		(209	)
Total	$	32,414		$	21,491

F-68

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Note 8—Debt

Revolving Credit Facilities

The Company maintains certain revolving credit facilities. The participating lenders in these revolving credit facilities include certain of the Company’s members or affiliates of the Company’s members. These revolving credit facilities are maintained to provide liquidity in the event of settlement failures by the Company’s members, to back up the commercial paper program and, in the case of the three-year facility, for general corporate purposes.

As of March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, there were no borrowings under the revolving credit facilities.

The revolving credit facilities consisted of the following at March 31, 2007:

	Maximum Allowed Borrowing Under Credit Facility		Expiration Date
Three-year facility	$	300,000	October 2007
364-day facility	$	1,450,000	November 2007
Incremental facility	$	500,000	June 2007*

* Under the terms of the 364-day credit agreement, Visa International may request up to three activations of an incremental facility up to a maximum principal amount of $500 million with a maximum expiration date of November 19, 2007. Once activated, the incremental facility is a committed credit facility until the expiration date granted by the lenders. At March 31, 2007, the commitments under the then-current incremental facility were to expire, and any loans thereunder mature, on June 15, 2007. On June 15, 2007, a new incremental facility maturing November 19, 2007 was activated. Following the activation on June 15, 2007, Visa International may make one additional incremental facility activation request until November 18, 2007.

Interest rates on the revolving credit facilities are determined at the option of the Company by either an alternative base rate or a ratings-based pricing grid which uses the Company’s senior unsecured long-term debt rating as assigned by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service. Interest is assessed at various conventional reference rates plus applicable margins.

The revolving credit facilities contain certain covenants and events of default, including financial covenants related to consolidated accumulated net income and other indebtedness, both of which are calculated and reported quarterly. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 with respect to the revolving credit facilities.

Note 9—Settlement Guarantee Management

Each member is responsible for settlement of transactions with other members. However, under the Company’s corporate bylaws, the Company indemnifies members for settlement loss suffered due to failure of any other member to honor Visa cards and travelers cheques processed in accordance with the Operating Regulations.

This indemnification creates settlement risk for the Company due to the difference in timing between the date of a payment transaction and the date of subsequent settlement. The term and amount of the indemnification are unlimited. Settlement risk is estimated using the average daily card volumes during the quarter multiplied by the estimated number of days to settle, and the total balance for outstanding travelers cheques. The Company’s

F-69

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

estimated settlement exposure, after consideration of the collateral amounts set forth below, amounted to $51.3 billion and $45.0 billion at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively. No material loss related to settlement risk was incurred for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006.

To manage the settlement risk under this indemnification and the resulting risk to all members, a formalized set of credit standards has been approved by the Visa International Board of Directors. If a member fails to meet any of the credit standards, it is subject to risk control measures such as collateral or trust arrangements. The Company also provides protection to members and merchants who have incurred losses as a result of counterfeit travelers cheques. The Company retains insurance coverage for such losses in excess of $1.0 million to a maximum of $5.0 million.

Under the Company’s bylaws and Operating Regulations, settlement losses are initially borne by the Company and subsequently recovered from the region where the member has its principal place of business. Annually, each region is responsible for losses up to $1 million plus 0.003% of its total volume for the fiscal year preceding the loss. Losses in excess of this amount are allocated among all regions in proportion to each region’s percentage of worldwide total volume. As a result, the Company receives a partial indemnification from its separately incorporated regional group members—Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe—for worldwide losses in excess of the loss sharing allocation.

Member Collateral

To reduce potential losses related to settlement risk, the Company requires certain members that do not meet the Company’s credit standards to post collateral in order to ensure their performance of settlement obligations arising from card and travelers cheque product clearings. The separately incorporated regional group members of the Company maintain similar collateral requirements for their members. The type of collateral is based on Board-approved standards that include cash equivalents, letters of credit, guarantees and securities. At March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, the Company held collateral as follows:

	March 31, 2007		September 30, 2006
Cash equivalents	$	305,328	$	276,513
Letters of credit		477,830		384,249
Guarantees		122,372		387,390
Securities		11,301		2,000
Total collateral	$	916,831	$	1,050,152

Approximately $304.8 million and $275.3 million of cash equivalents are classified as both an asset and corresponding liability on the consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.

Settlement Risk Guarantee

The fair value of the settlement risk guarantee is estimated using a proprietary model. Key inputs to the model include statistically derived loss factors based on historical experience, estimated settlement exposures at period end and a standardized grading process for members and country exposures. The model is independently reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to capture recent characteristics of the membership, historical loss experience, and changes in Visa International’s global risk policies and procedures. As of March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, the value of the settlement risk guarantee was $0.2 million.

F-70

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Note 10—Pension

United States Plans

The Company sponsors jointly with Visa U.S.A. a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan and a postretirement plan, which provide retirement benefits for substantially all of its employees in the United States.

Net periodic pension cost for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 included the following components:

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	Six Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Service cost	$	31,222		$	37,013		$	2,790		$	3,378
Interest cost		21,670			20,582			2,398			1,811
Expected return on plan assets		(18,282	)		(18,067	)		—			—
Amortization of:
Prior service cost		506			506			(2,330	)		(2,329	)
Actuarial loss		4,226			8,659			1,088			902
Net periodic pension cost		39,342			48,693			3,946			3,762
Additional settlement charges		—			2,803			—			—
Total net benefit cost	$	39,342		$	51,496		$	3,946		$	3,762
Visa International’s portion of net periodic pension cost	$	8,208		$	10,978		$	706		$	684
Visa International’s portion of additional settlement charge	$	—		$	1,177		$	—		$	—

The following table presents the actual contributions made by the Company from its employer assets for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the expected contributions for fiscal 2007 under its pension plan and postretirement plan:

	Pension Plan				Postretirement Plan
	Total Contributions		Visa International’s Portion		Total Contributions		Visa International’s Portion
Actual Employer Contributions
Six months ended March 31, 2007	$	435	$	160	$	1,864	$	558
Expected Employer Contributions
Fiscal 2007	$	51,000	$	10,700	$	3,700	$	1,100

In connection with excess pension plan obligations settled during the six months ended March 31, 2006, the plan recognized previously unrecognized net losses. These settlement losses were recorded in personnel expense on the consolidated statements of operations. Total excess pension plan payments and net settlement losses for the six months ended March 31, 2006 were $4.2 million and $2.8 million, of which Visa International’s portion was $1.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively. There were no pension plan settlement losses during the six months ending March 31, 2007.

F-71

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

United Kingdom Plans

The Company participates in various qualified and nonqualified defined benefit plans, which provide retirement and death benefits for the Company’s employees residing in the United Kingdom.

Net periodic pension cost for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 included the following components:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
Service cost	$	2,200		$	1,744
Interest cost		1,872			1,507
Expected return on plan assets		(1,750	)		(1,342	)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost		10			27
Actuarial loss		622			618
Lump sum risk premiums		194			140
Net periodic pension cost	$	3,148		$	2,694

For the six months ended March 31, 2007, the Company contributed $2.7 million to these plans. The expected contributions from employer assets to the benefit plans for fiscal 2007 are $4.3 million.

Note 11—Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the six months ended March 31, 2007 was 42.9% compared to 59.1% for the six months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to an increase in pre-tax income and a resulting decrease in certain non-deductible items as a percentage of pre-tax income. The effective tax rate also decreased due to the reassessment of various tax reserves in both periods.

Note 12—Derivative Financial Instruments

The functional currency for Visa International is the U.S. dollar (“USD”). The Company transacts business in USD and in various foreign currencies. This activity subjects the Company to exposure from movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s policy is to enter into foreign exchange forward and option derivative instruments to manage the variability in expected future cash flows of certain foreign currency denominated revenues and expenses attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. These derivative instruments are denominated in the foreign currency in which the exposures are denominated. All derivative instruments outstanding at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 have maturities of less than 10 months and 16 months, respectively. The Company does not use foreign currency option or foreign exchange forward contracts for speculative or trading purposes. All derivatives are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value in other current assets or accrued and other liabilities and the resulting gains or losses from changes in fair value are accounted for depending on whether the derivative is designated as either a cash flow or balance sheet hedge.

F-72

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company enters into forward and option contracts to hedge certain operational (“cash flow”) exposures resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Such cash flow exposures result from portions of forecasted revenues and expenses denominated in currencies other than USD.

To qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment, the Company formally documents, at inception of the hedge, all relationships between hedging transactions and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company also formally assesses (at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, on the consolidated balance sheets. When the forecasted transaction occurs and is recognized in earnings, the amount in other comprehensive income (loss), net related to that hedge is reclassified to revenue or operating expense. The balance accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss), net was not significant at March 31, 2007 and the Company expects to reclassify the entire amount to earnings during fiscal 2007 and 2008 due to the recognition in earnings of the hedged forecasted transactions.

During fiscal 2006, the Company changed its methodology for effectiveness testing and measurement from including to excluding time value. The changes in time value are now reported immediately in operating expenses or revenues depending on the underlying hedged item. For the six months ended March 31, 2007, the amount recorded in earnings related to excluded time value was immaterial.

The Company assesses effectiveness prospectively using regression analysis and retrospectively using a dollar offset test. Because time value is excluded from effectiveness, the effectiveness tests are performed on the foreign exchange forward and option contracts based on changes in the spot rate or strike rate of the derivative instrument compared to changes in the spot rate or strike rate of the forecasted hedged transaction. In the event there is recognized ineffectiveness or it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur, the related gains and losses on the cash flow hedge are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net on the consolidated balance sheet to other expense on the consolidated statement of operations at that time. For the six months ended March 31, 2007, there were no gains or losses recognized in other expense due to measurable ineffectiveness, failure of an effectiveness assessment or the discontinuance of cash flow hedge accounting.

Balance Sheet Hedges

The Company uses forward rate contracts to economically hedge certain non-functional currency assets and liabilities to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These forward contracts are not designated for hedge accounting. The change in fair value of these derivatives is recorded in other expense and offsets the change in fair value of the underlying foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.

F-73

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The following table provides information about the Company’s foreign currency forward and option contracts at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006:

March 31, 2007	USD Notional		Estimated Fair Value Gain (Loss)
Cash Flow Hedges
Forward Contracts
Sell foreign currencies	$	62,307	$	(1,533	)
Purchase foreign currencies	$	49,820	$	1,353
Option Contracts
Sell foreign currencies	$	104,105	$	(1,162	)
Purchase foreign currencies	$	4,306	$	28
Balance Sheet Hedges
Forward Contracts
Purchase foreign currencies	$	2,655	$	36

September 30, 2006	USD Notional		Estimated Fair Value Gain (Loss)
Cash Flow Hedges
Forward Contracts
Purchase foreign currencies	$	50,569	$	(389	)
Balance Sheet Hedges
Forward Contracts
Purchase foreign currencies	$	3,973	$	132

The currencies underlying the foreign exchange forward and option contracts at March 31, 2007 consisted primarily of British pound, Brazilian real, Australian dollar, Singapore dollar, Mexican peso, Japanese yen and South Korean won. The foreign exchange forward and option contracts at September 30, 2006 was in British pound. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are subject to both credit and market risk. Credit risk is the risk of loss due to failure of a counterparty to perform its obligations in accordance with contractual terms. Market risk is the potential change in an investment’s value caused by fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, credit spreads or other variables. The Company monitors the credit-worthiness of the financial institutions that are counterparties to its derivative financial instruments and does not consider the risks of counterparty nonperformance to be material. Notwithstanding the Company’s efforts to manage foreign exchange risk, there can be no assurance that its hedging activities will adequately protect against the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations. Credit and market risks (as a result of an offset by the underlying cash flow being hedged) related to derivative instruments were not considered significant at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006.

F-74

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

The Company’s future minimum payments on non-cancelable leases and marketing and other agreements, excluding payments to Visa Resources, at March 31, 2007 were as follows:

Years Ending September 30,	Leases		Marketing and Other		Total
2007 (remaining six months)	$	9,184	$	46,949	$	56,133
2008		11,421		39,118		50,539
2009		6,604		28,135		34,739
2010		4,465		20,804		25,269
2011		3,946		19,151		23,097
2012		3,950		17,480		21,430
Thereafter		33,899		3,521		37,420
Total	$	73,469	$	175,158	$	248,627

In March 2006, the Company entered into an eight-year agreement to sponsor the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup, commencing in January 2007. On December 6, 2006, a trial court in New York granted MasterCard Incorporated (“MasterCard”) injunctive relief against FIFA, with the effect of awarding the FIFA sponsorship contemplated in the Visa-FIFA agreement to MasterCard Worldwide (“MasterCard”) instead. FIFA has appealed the court’s decision, which appeal is currently pending. Until this MasterCard-FIFA litigation is finally resolved or the Company otherwise resolves the matter between itself and FIFA, the Company’s rights and obligations under the Visa-FIFA agreement are not certain. The contractual payments under the agreement total $180.0 million over the eight-year term of the agreement and are payable in annual installments. The payment which was due in January 2007 has been temporarily delayed, by agreement with FIFA; the remaining payments are not included in the table above. Visa may realize financial and other remedies from FIFA in the event that FIFA is unable to perform under the Visa sponsorship agreement as a result of the MasterCard litigation.

Contingencies

The Company has incentive agreements with members and other organizations for various programs designed to build payments volume, increase card issuance and acceptance and increase other Visa branded transactions. These card, volume and support incentives are earned by members based on their performance over the term of the incentive agreement, which may range from one to seven years, and are recognized as a reduction of revenue in the same period as the related revenues are earned, based on management’s estimate of the members’ performance as compared to the terms of the incentive agreement. The agreements are generally cancelable by Visa International. Excluding anticipated revenue to be earned from higher payments and transaction volumes in connection with these agreements, the expected reduction of future earnings in the next six years resulting from these agreements is estimated to be a maximum of $389.9 million as of March 31, 2007.

Note 14—Legal Matters

Visa International is a party to various legal and regulatory proceedings. These proceedings involve complex claims that are subject to substantial uncertainties and unspecified damages and the probability of loss and an estimation of damages are not possible to ascertain at present. Accordingly, Visa International has not

F-75

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

established reserves for these legal and regulatory proceedings. In addition, under Visa International’s membership agreement with Visa U.S.A. and Visa International’s operating regulations, Visa International believes it is indemnified against losses with respect to certain legal and regulatory proceedings pertaining to U.S. operations. If Visa International is not successful in its defense of any of these legal and regulatory proceedings, or if Visa U.S.A. does not meet its indemnification obligations or does not have adequate financial resources to fully indemnify Visa International, Visa International could incur judgments or fines or enter into settlement of claims that could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Visa International is presently involved in the matters described below and those described in Note 20 to the audited financial statements included in its 2006 Annual Report.

American Express/Discover

On October 4, 2004, Discover Financial Services, Inc. (Discover) filed an action against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International (collectively referred to in this note as “Visa”), as well as MasterCard International Incorporated (MasterCard) in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On November 15, 2004, American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (American Express) filed a similar action in the same court against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard, and certain of their member financial institutions. Both complaints seek treble damages and injunctive relief under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, asserting that Visa’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s Competitive Programs Policy (CPP) prevented banks from issuing payment cards on the American Express and Discover networks. Discover also contends that Visa’s “Honor All Cards” rule reinforced the anticompetitive effects of bylaw 2.10(e).

Both lawsuits have been assigned to the district court judge who presided in United States v. Visa (the DOJ Case), in which the Department of Justice challenged bylaw 2.10(e) and the CPP. In the DOJ Case, the court in 2001 enjoined Visa and MasterCard from enacting, enforcing, or maintaining any bylaw, rule, policy, or practice that prohibits members from issuing general purpose or debit cards on any other general purpose card network. In accordance with this court order, Visa U.S.A. repealed bylaw 2.10(e). The court has deferred ruling on whether, or to what extent, it will give collateral estoppel effect in the American Express and Discover cases to factual findings made in the DOJ Case.

The defendants moved to dismiss certain claims in the American Express and Discover cases. In the fall of 2005, the court granted MasterCard and Visa International’s motions to dismiss Discover’s attempted monopolization and monopolization claims against them, because Discover did not allege that either MasterCard or Visa International individually had sufficient market share to maintain these claims. The court denied Visa U.S.A.’s analogous motion, however, finding that Discover had alleged sufficient market share as to Visa U.S.A. The court also denied Visa and MasterCard’s motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ debit card claims, ruling that the plaintiffs had properly alleged a debit card market. Visa’s motion to dismiss American Express’s exclusive-dealing claim was also denied.

At a hearing on April 25, 2007, the District Court for the Southern District of New York set a trial date of September 9, 2008 for both the American Express and Discover cases. The court also established deadlines and procedures for motions practice and expert discovery.

On June 7, 2007, Discover filed a Second Amended Complaint, which eliminated allegations related to the “Honor All Cards” rule, dropped attempted monopolization and monopolization claims against MasterCard and

F-76

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

Visa International to conform to the court’s rulings on motions to dismiss, and made technical changes to names of the plaintiffs.

Debit/Credit Tying Cases (“Indirect Purchaser” Actions)

Forty so-called “indirect purchaser” actions have been filed against Visa and MasterCard in nineteen states and the District of Columbia. In these actions, the plaintiffs purport to represent classes of residents of one or more states who purchased goods at merchants that accepted Visa- or MasterCard-branded payment cards. They claim to have paid higher prices as a result of the purported “tying” and other alleged anti-competitive conduct. The plaintiffs assert claims under state antitrust statutes, state consumer protection statutes, and common law. Visa International is named as a defendant in only six of the cases, all filed in California, asserting claims against Visa International under the Cartwright Act and Section 17200 of the California Business and Professions Code.

In the California cases, consolidated before the Superior Court for the State of California in the City and County of San Francisco, Visa filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings based on California Proposition 64, which limits a plaintiff’s standing to bring claims under Section 17200. After oral argument, the court denied Visa’s motion on March 6, 2007. The California Court of Appeal rejected a petition seeking immediate review of that decision on June 7, 2007.

ATM Exchange Litigation

On November 14, 2005, ATM Exchange sued Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in United States District Court for the District of Ohio. The plaintiff asserts claims of promissory estoppel, negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent misrepresentation, alleging that Visa’s “deferment” of a deadline for meeting heightened ATM data encryption testing and approval standards harmed the plaintiff by reducing demand for its ATM upgrade solution.

The parties have engaged in written discovery, party and third-party depositions, and expert discovery. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International anticipate filing dispositive motions in the case by June 29, 2007. Trial is tentatively scheduled for September 2007.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Cryptography Research, Inc.

In September of 2004, Cryptography Research, Inc. (CRI) filed a lawsuit against Visa International in U.S. District Court in California alleging breach of contract, misrepresentation, and patent infringement. The lawsuit arises from a 1998 license agreement between CRI and Visa International pursuant to which Visa International received the right to sublicense certain CRI technology for use in smart cards. After the license agreement was terminated, CRI claimed that Visa International was obligated to pay per-card royalties on certain smart cards. In addition, CRI has alleged that Visa International has infringed certain patents claimed by CRI. Discovery in this matter is currently ongoing. A patent claims construction hearing was held on November 8 and 9, 2005. On October 19, 2006, the parties received the first of eight pending claims construction orders. A second claims construction order was received on May 4, 2007. Fact discovery is ongoing.

On December 11, 2006, CRI filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint adding claims for breach of fiduciary duty and violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and California Unfair Competition laws.

F-77

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The court granted this motion on March 20, 2007 and the Second Amended Complaint was filed on March 22, 2007. Visa International filed its answer to the Second Amended Complaint and related counterclaims on April 23, 2007.

Vale Canjeable

On November 21, 2006, Vale Canjeable Ticketven, C.A., filed an action in the Fifth Municipal Court of Caracas against Todoticket 2004, C.A., and Visa International seeking a preliminary injunction preventing use of the Visa Vale mark in Venezuela. On November 29, 2006, the Fifth Municipal Court of Caracas granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting use of the “Vale” mark by Visa in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers.

In December 2006, Vale Canjeable Ticketven, C.A., also filed a claim with the Fourth Commercial Court of First Instance of Caracas alleging that the defendants infringed the plaintiff’s rights as the holder of the trademark registries and requesting that the Court: (i) declare the plaintiff is the only authorized user of the expression “Vale” in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers; (ii) prohibit the defendants from using the expression “Vale” in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers; and (iii) order the defendants to pay financial damages and legal costs. On March 21, 2007, defendants filed a motion with the Fourth Commercial Court of First Instance of Caracas asking them to revoke the preliminary injunction. The Court’s decision on this motion is pending.

Note 15—Operating Segments

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. This standard requires segmentation based on the Company’s internal organization and reporting of revenue and operating profit. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) as defined by SFAS 131. The Company is primarily structured in geographical segments, and the CODM reviews consolidated financial information related to revenues and operating profit for each of the following three geographic segments: Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA. The CODM also reviews financial information for the headquarters division, Visa Worldwide Services (“VWS”).

Visa AP, Visa LAC and Visa CEMEA provide products and services to their member financial institutions and generate service fees, international service revenues, data processing fees and other revenues. VWS earns service fee revenue by charging cost-based fees to all Visa regions (including separately incorporated regions) based primarily on payments volume. In addition, VWS earns international service revenue from foreign currency exchange activities in connection with the settlement of multi-currency transactions. Non-operating income, net, primarily relates to interest and dividend income from investments, rental income, and equity in earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries, offset by interest expense on the Company’s borrowed funds at VWS.

The reports reviewed by the CODM are based on the Company’s internal management reporting process. The presentation of information in the Company’s management reports differs from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) primarily due to intercompany allocations and differences in reporting classifications.

F-78

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The following table gives operating segment information as reviewed by the CODM and reconciled to the consolidated U.S. GAAP financial statements for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:

Six Months Ended March 31, 2007	Visa AP		Visa LAC		Visa CEMEA		VWS		Reclassifications			Consolidated Total
Total operating revenues	$	336,366	$	204,266	$	118,305	$	233,324	$	(33,004	)	$	859,257
Total operating expenses	$	192,897	$	148,340	$	92,633	$	229,793	$	(26,197	)	$	637,466
Operating income	$	143,469	$	55,926	$	25,672	$	3,531	$	(6,807	)	$	221,791
Non-operating income, net	$	6,059	$	3,441	$	83	$	16,024	$	6,807		$	32,414
Income before provision for income taxes	$	149,528	$	59,367	$	25,755	$	19,555	$	—		$	254,205
Depreciation and amortization expenses	$	4,334	$	1,683	$	3,194	$	12,461	$	—		$	21,672
Equity earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries	$	191	$	232	$	76	$	1,071	$	—		$	1,570
Six Months Ended March 31, 2006
Total operating revenues	$	237,874	$	127,138	$	94,087	$	225,339	$	(31,722	)	$	652,716
Total operating expenses	$	182,335	$	111,561	$	86,594	$	186,100	$	(27,034	)	$	539,556
Operating income	$	55,539	$	15,577	$	7,493	$	39,239	$	(4,688	)	$	113,160
Non-operating income, net	$	3,491	$	3,373	$	207	$	9,732	$	4,688		$	21,491
Income before provision for income taxes	$	59,030	$	18,950	$	7,700	$	48,971	$	—		$	134,651
Depreciation and amortization expenses	$	3,511	$	2,076	$	4,772	$	6,414	$	—		$	16,773
Equity earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries	$	840	$	1,040	$	192	$	777	$	—		$	2,849

Amounts in the reclassification column of the above table consist of the following:

	Six Months Ended March 31, 2007
	Operating Revenue			Operating Expense			Non-Operating Income
Fees allocated by VWS to Visa AP, Visa LAC, and Visa CEMEA	$	(34,003	)	$	(34,003	)	$	—
Classification of facilities income and expense		749			4,800			4,051
Other revenue, expense and non-operating income classifications		250			3,006			2,756
	$	(33,004	)	$	(26,197	)	$	6,807

	Six Months Ended March 31, 2006
	Operating Revenue			Operating Expense			Non-Operating Income
Fees allocated by VWS to Visa AP, Visa LAC, and Visa CEMEA	$	(32,167	)	$	(32,167	)	$	—
Classification of facilities income and expense		570			4,724			4,154
Other revenue, expense and non-operating income classifications		(125	)		409			534
	$	(31,722	)	$	(27,034	)	$	4,688

F-79

VISA INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Unaudited (Continued)

(In thousands, except as noted)

The following table provides segment assets for the periods indicated:

	Total Assets								Consolidated Total
	Visa AP		Visa LAC		Visa CEMEA		VWS
March 31, 2007	$	156,438	$	193,823	$	184,039	$	1,488,392	$	2,022,692
September 30, 2006	$	152,036	$	157,103	$	164,013	$	1,539,387	$	2,012,539

Note 16—Subsequent Event

Global Restructuring Agreement

On June 15, 2007, the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe approved the Global Restructuring Agreement that contemplates a series of transactions by which Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Inovant will become subsidiaries of Visa Inc. The Global Restructuring Agreement contemplates that Visa Europe will not become a subsidiary of Visa Inc. and will become a stockholder of Visa Inc. and will enter into a series of contractual relationships that will govern its relationship with Visa Inc.

F-80

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Visa U.S.A. Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Visa U.S.A. Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members’ equity (deficit), comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Visa U.S.A. Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force No. 02-14, Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other Than Common Stock, during the year ended September 30, 2005.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California

June 6, 2007

F-81

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	As of September 30
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	270,124		$	135,397
Investment securities, available-for-sale		660,451			681,144
Accounts receivable		216,585			198,248
Settlement receivable		41,450			35,297
Current portion of volume and support agreements		110,751			161,627
Current portion of deferred tax assets		149,671			128,038
Prepaid and other current assets		144,899			138,294
Total current assets		1,593,931			1,478,045
Investment securities, available-for-sale		515,290			318,876
Volume and support agreements		43,071			97,137
Investment in Visa International		186,353			173,099
Facilities, equipment, and software, net		280,899			320,208
Deferred tax assets		237,533			292,280
Other assets		106,841			65,742
Total assets	$	2,963,918		$	2,745,387
Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	119,075		$	127,575
Settlement payable		88,767			63,973
Accrued compensation		179,557			158,893
Volume and support agreements		216,255			149,215
Current portion of member deposits		134,070			142,627
Accrued liabilities		406,815			453,153
Current portion of long-term debt		32,339			32,339
Current portion of accrued litigation		216,085			197,477
Total current liabilities		1,392,963			1,325,252
Member deposits		3,320			128,832
Other liabilities		122,083			59,625
Long-term debt		41,280			73,619
Accrued litigation		783,618			1,010,443
Total liabilities		2,343,264			2,597,771
Minority interest		37,840			21,995
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
Equity
Accumulated net income		583,772			129,211
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(958	)		(3,590	)
Total equity		582,814			125,621
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,963,918		$	2,745,387

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-82

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006			2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Operating Revenues
Card service fees	$	1,482,439		$	1,288,588		$	1,191,211
Data processing fees		1,247,969			1,139,080			1,037,763
Volume and support agreements		(587,751	)		(524,107	)		(466,064	)
International transaction fees		397,954			360,269			306,553
Other revenues		407,515			400,775			359,894
Total operating revenues		2,948,126			2,664,605			2,429,357
Operating Expenses
Personnel		671,093			618,723			628,373
Facilities		89,298			92,619			89,898
Network, EDP, and communications		327,593			338,288			299,752
Advertising, marketing, and promotion		539,258			528,138			470,665
Visa International fees		159,264			168,455			196,297
Professional and consulting fees		291,235			273,009			231,059
Administrative and other		117,837			60,117			45,934
Litigation provision		22,878			132,334			36,900
Total operating expenses		2,218,456			2,211,683			1,998,878
Operating income		729,670			452,922			430,479
Other Income (Expense)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		13,355			30,799			21,967
Interest expense		(89,539	)		(108,485	)		(111,301	)
Investment income, net		68,330			81,009			13,926
Total other (expense) income		(7,854	)		3,323			(75,408	)
Income before income taxes and minority interest		721,816			456,245			355,071
Income tax expense		251,338			183,296			132,558
Income before minority interest		470,478			272,949			222,513
Minority interest		(15,917	)		(8,248	)		(6,645	)
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		454,561			264,701			215,868
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax (Note 3)		—			95,744			(6,214	)
Net income	$	454,561		$	360,445		$	209,654
Pro forma amounts assuming the accounting changes are applied retroactively (Note 3)	$	—		$	264,701		$	221,080

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-83

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT)

	Accumulated Net (Loss) Income			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total (Deficit) Equity
	(in thousands)
Balance as of September 30, 2003	$	(440,888	)	$	1,244		$	(439,644	)
Net income		209,654						209,654
Other comprehensive income, net of tax					89			89
Comprehensive income								209,743
Balance as of September 30, 2004	$	(231,234	)	$	1,333		$	(229,901	)
Net income		360,445						360,445
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax					(4,923	)		(4,923	)
Comprehensive income								355,522
Balance as of September 30, 2005	$	129,211		$	(3,590	)	$	125,621
Net income		454,561						454,561
Other comprehensive income, net of tax					2,632			2,632
Comprehensive income								457,193
Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	583,772		$	(958	)	$	582,814

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006			2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Net Income	$	454,561		$	360,445		$	209,654
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities, available-for-sale		5,589			(366	)		790
Income tax (expense) benefit		(2,018	)		385			(253	)
Reclassification adjustment for net gain realized in net income		(1,473	)		(7,732	)		(750	)
Income tax benefit		534			2,790			302
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		2,632			(4,923	)		89
Comprehensive income	$	457,193		$	355,522		$	209,743

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-84

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006			2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Operating Activities
Net income	$	454,561		$	360,445		$	209,654
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		123,361			118,531			98,298
Amortization		16,802			16,997			13,138
Asset impairment		13,167			1,276			—
Net realized gain on investment securities		(1,473	)		(7,732	)		(750	)
Gain on sale of joint venture		—			(41,968	)		—
Loss on sale of assets		3,213			—			—
Minority interest		15,917			8,248			6,645
Amortization of volume and support agreements		580,043			572,777			498,205
Cumulative effect of accounting change—volume and support agreements		—			—			6,214
Accrued litigation and accretion		114,468			226,222			138,998
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		(13,355	)		(30,802	)		(21,969	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change—equity in earnings of Visa International		—			(95,744	)		—
Deferred income taxes		31,630			85,186			68,010
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(18,337	)		(14,285	)		(39,458	)
Settlement receivable		(6,153	)		(17,624	)		(1,346	)
Volume and support agreements		(408,061	)		(471,903	)		(595,869	)
Other assets		(62,270	)		(76,675	)		28,371
Accounts payable		(8,500	)		56,580			(39,825	)
Settlement payable		24,794			28,593			12,326
Accrued compensation		20,664			(11,595	)		(13,881	)
Accrued and other liabilities		19,349			184,640			115,732
Accrued litigation		(322,685	)		(267,807	)		(204,805	)
Member deposits		(142,627	)		(142,731	)		155,704
Net cash provided by operating activities		434,508			480,629			433,392

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-85

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006			2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Investing Activities
Investment securities, available-for-sale:
Purchases		(3,783,841	)		(1,896,715	)		(1,204,555	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities		3,607,904			1,425,427			1,005,839
Proceeds from sale of interest in Inovant LLC		—			2,424			—
Distributions from joint ventures		—			20,000			15,000
Proceeds from sale of joint venture		—			95,000			—
Purchases of facilities, equipment, and software		(87,265	)		(119,267	)		(122,211	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(263,202	)		(473,131	)		(305,927	)
Financing Activities
Principal payments on debt		(33,200	)		(33,200	)		(33,200	)
Debt issuance costs		—			—			(3,000	)
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		(3,379	)		(568	)		—
Minority interest distribution		—			(12,198	)		(3,090	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(36,579	)		(45,966	)		(39,290	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		134,727			(38,468	)		88,175
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		135,397			173,865			85,690
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	270,124		$	135,397		$	173,865
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	261,600		$	122,529		$	22,661
Increase in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities related to purchases of facilities, equipment and software	$	9,033		$	6,257		$	776
Interest payments on debt	$	5,772		$	7,585		$	8,705

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-86

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Note 1—Organization

Visa U.S.A. Inc. (Visa, Visa U.S.A., or the Company) consists of Visa U.S.A. Inc. and its subsidiaries: Inovant, Inc., International Anasazi, Inc., Interlink Network, Inc., Integrated Solutions Concepts, Inc., Debit Processing Services, Inc., Plus System, Inc., Inovant LLC, and Advanced Resolution Services, Inc.

In June 2006 the Company dissolved its wholly-owned subsidiary, Merchant Processing Holdings, Inc. (MPH). MPH held the Company’s joint venture interest in Vital Processing Services L.L.C., which was sold in March 2005.

In June 2005 the Company incorporated Advanced Resolution Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Visa U.S.A. in order to provide various fraud-prevention and security-related services to Visa members.

The Company has one operating and reportable segment, “Payment Services” in the United States. The Company’s activities are interrelated, and each activity is dependent upon and supportive of the other. Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based on analysis of Visa U.S.A. as one operating and reportable segment.

Visa is a non-stock, non-assessable, Delaware membership corporation. The Company operates a payment system that enables consumers and businesses to conduct financial transactions using Visa-branded payment products at physical and virtual points-of-sale and at automated teller machines which are identified by the Visa Brand Mark, Visa Point-of-Sale Graphic or familiar three-band Visa Flag, and other various designs and marks in the United States.

Visa’s products and services enable its members to participate in an international payment system that none could offer individually. Visa U.S.A. does not issue cards, set fees, or determine the interest rates consumers will be charged on Visa-branded cards. Visa U.S.A.’s issuing members have the independent responsibility individually to determine these and most other competitive card features. These functions are performed by Visa member financial institutions in competition with one another. Visa U.S.A. establishes standards and procedures for acceptance and settlement of member transactions. Visa’s services allow merchants and consumers to use efficient, secure, and guaranteed payment products in lieu of cash, checks, and other forms of payment. Its relationship is with the cardholder’s issuing and merchant’s acquiring member financial institutions.

Membership is composed of financial institutions participating in this system. At its April 2006 Annual Meeting, the Company adopted an amended Certificate of Incorporation and amended bylaws which changed the composition of the Board of Directors and clarified dividend, dissolution, membership interest, and voting rights. In accordance with the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws, members pay service fees each quarter based on payments volume for the preceding quarter. Payments volume is defined as total monetary value of transactions for goods and services purchased, initiated with Visa products, including PIN-based debit, and excluding cash transactions. Members’ dividend and dissolution rights, membership interests in the corporation, and voting rights are based on the members’ respective cumulative portions of the total of all of certain fees paid to the Company up to the most recent Reference Date as defined in the amended Certificate of Incorporation. The initial Reference Date is May 1, 2006 and members’ proportions will be adjusted as of each third anniversary of that date. The Board of Directors includes independent Directors who meet eligibility requirements set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation, including the definition of independence from the Company and its members. The chief executive officers of the Company and of Visa International Service Association (Visa International) serve as ex officio non-voting directors. Directors other than ex officio directors

F-87

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

are elected in at-large voting by members in accordance with voting rights and director qualifications set forth in the Company’s bylaws. Under the amended Certificate of Incorporation, the directors will serve staggered terms of two years. Members represented on the Board of Directors accounted for 41 percent of total payments volume for the twelve months ended June 30, 2006. Visa members, which are comprised of domestic banks and other financial institutions, represent 100 percent of the Company’s payments volume.

In October 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan to form Visa Inc. by merger transactions including Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada Association (Visa Canada), and Visa International (Note 20).

Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Visa and its subsidiaries prepare their financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Visa and its subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. The Company consolidates entities when it has a greater than 50 percent ownership or when it exercises control. Minority interest is recorded for consolidated entities in which the Company has less than 100 percent ownership interest. Minority interest represents the equity interest not owned by the Company.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications, not affecting net income, have been made to prior period information to conform to the current period presentation format.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates include certain revenue discounts and volume-based support incentives, assumptions used in the determination of pension and postretirement costs, discount rates used to present value long-term obligations, and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, among others.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and certain highly liquid investments with original maturities of ninety days or less from the date of purchase. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Investments with original maturities beyond ninety days and maturing in less than one year are considered short-term investments. Investments with maturities in excess of one year are considered long-term investments.

The Company classifies its debt and marketable equity securities as available-for-sale. These securities are recorded at cost at the time of purchase and are carried at fair value, based on current market quotations.

F-88

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Unrealized gains and losses are reported in Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax. The Company does not engage in investment trading activities. A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in its carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. In evaluating other-than-temporary impairment, the Company reviews sustained declines in market price below the amount recorded for the investment and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investment until recovery, which may in certain cases be maturity. The Company considers the length of time and extent to which market value has been less than cost and other relevant factors such as the issuer’s financial condition, and the Company’s investment horizon. Net realized gains and losses are determined on a specific identification basis and are included in Investment Income, Net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related available-for-sale security as an adjustment to yield and are included in Investment Income, Net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned, and are included in Investment Income, Net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Financial Instruments

The Company considers cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, long-term investments, notes receivable, short-term debt and notes payable to be financial instruments. Except as described in Note 14, the estimated fair value of such instruments as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 approximate their carrying values as reported in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Settlement Receivable and Payable

The Company operates systems for clearing and settling deposit access products. Net settlements are generally cleared daily among its members. However, some transactions may not settle until subsequent business days, resulting in amounts due from and to members. These settlement amounts are stated at cost and presented on a gross basis on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Indemnification

The Company accounts for indemnifications using the framework of FASB Interpretation No. 45 “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (FIN 45), which requires that an obligation be recorded if estimable, regardless of the probability of occurrence. The Company indemnifies issuing and acquiring members from settlement losses suffered by reason of the failure of any other member to honor drafts, travelers checks, or other instruments processed in accordance with operating regulations. The Company’s estimate of its liability for settlement indemnification is included in Accrued Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and is described in Note 17.

Prepaid Assets

The Company records prepayments of goods and services. The amounts are recorded in Prepaid and Other Current Assets and Other Assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company expenses these amounts to the Consolidated Statements of Operations over the period of benefit.

F-89

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Investments in Joint Ventures, Affiliates, and Subsidiaries

Investments resulting in ownership of approximately 20 to 50 percent, or in excess of 5 percent of a flow-through entity (e.g., limited partnerships, limited liability companies), are accounted for using the equity method. Investments in business entities in which the Company does not have control, but has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies, are accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, the Company’s share of each entity’s profit or loss is reflected currently in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations rather than when realized through dividends or distributions. Other non-marketable investments, resulting in ownership interests of less than these percentages, are accounted for using the cost method.

The Company has interests in certain limited partnerships and limited liability companies and has evaluated these entities for consolidation using the framework established by Financial Interpretation 46 (revised), “Consolidation-Variable Interest Entities: Guidance on Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46). The Company has determined that its ownership in these entities does not constitute ownership of Variable Interest Entities as defined in FIN 46. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of these entities and has accounted for these investments under the equity method.

Facilities, Equipment, and Software

Facilities, equipment, and software are recorded at historical cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from three to forty years, except for land and construction-in-progress, which are not depreciated.

Depreciation and amortization are provided for facilities, equipment, and software on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the respective classes of assets as follows:

Facilities
Buildings	40 years
Building improvements	3 to 40 years
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of lease life or 10 years
Furniture and fixtures	10 years
Equipment	3 to 5 years
Software	3 to 5 years

Pursuant to SOP 98-1, “Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use,” computer software development incurred during the development stage of projects is capitalized. The Company capitalizes such costs when costs incurred during the development stage of projects exceed $1 million. Costs incurred prior to reaching the development stage of projects and other research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

The Company capitalizes purchased software. Capitalized software costs included in Facilities, Equipment, and Software, Net on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of up to five years.

Costs for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, while major improvements that increase functionality of the asset are capitalized and depreciated ratably to expense over the identified useful life.

F-90

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Intangible Assets

The Company initially records intangible assets at fair value and evaluates the useful life of each asset. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis. Assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are evaluated annually to confirm that events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. As of September 30, 2006 the Company had no intangible assets.

Impairment

In accordance with FASB Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the Company evaluates the recoverability of all long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of an asset, an impairment loss is recognized. The loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value calculated using the present value of estimated net future cash flows.

Volume and Support Agreements

Volume and support agreements are incentive agreements with members, merchants, and other business partners designed to build sales volume and increase product acceptance. The Company capitalizes certain payments under volume and support agreements related to signing or renewing long-term contracts. Volume and support incentives are accrued based on management’s estimate of the members’ performance according to provisions in the related agreements. These accruals are routinely reviewed and estimates of performance are adjusted as appropriate. Capitalized costs and the Company’s estimated obligations under these agreements are amortized as a reduction of operating revenue or as part of Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion expense on either a straight-line or a sales-volume basis over the period of benefit.

The Company considers any contract where greater than 60 percent of payments are based on sales volume to be predominantly sales-based. Sales-based contracts with expected payments over $10 million are amortized based on estimated forecasted sales volume data. All other contracts with expected payments of $1 million or more are amortized on a straight-line basis. Contracts with expected payments of less than $1 million are accounted for in accordance with the Company’s prepaid and accrued liability accounting policies.

Accrued Litigation

The Company evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome of the legal or regulatory proceedings to which it is a party in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” These judgments are subjective based on the status of legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of its defenses and consultation with in-house and external legal counsel. The actual outcomes of these proceedings may materially differ from the Company’s judgment.

Accrued litigation is accounted for using the present value of actual and estimable future payment obligations, discounted at the estimated rate of sources of credit that could be used to finance the payment of such obligations with similar terms. The current portion of accrued litigation represents the present value of payments to be made over the next year (Note 18).

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue is comprised principally of card service fees, data processing fees, international transaction fees, and other revenues. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Securities and

F-91

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 “Revenue Recognition” (SAB 104), and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (EITF 00-21). Revenue is recognized when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed, and collectibility of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

Card service fees predominantly represent payments by members with respect to their card programs carrying marks of the Visa brand. Card service fees are based principally upon spending on Visa-branded cards for goods and services as reported on member quarterly operating certificates. Current quarter service fees are assessed and recognized ratably over the quarter using a calculation of pricing applied to prior quarter volumes.

Data processing fees represent user fees for authorization, clearing, settlement, transaction processing services and other maintenance and support services that facilitate transaction and information processing among the Company’s members globally, Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe Limited (Visa Europe). These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.

International transaction fees are assessed to members on foreign transactions of U.S.-based issuing banks and domestic transactions of foreign-based issuing banks in cross-border transactions. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.

Other Revenues represent optional card enhancements, such as extended cardholder protection and concierge services, cardholder and merchant services, software development services, and other services provided to members, Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe. Software development services are provided through Inovant LLC on a time and materials basis primarily to Visa International, Visa Europe, and Visa Canada. Development services are recognized as revenue in the period services are rendered.

For certain programs, the Company records deferred revenue when cash is collected from members in advance and use of the funds is for designated program purposes. Revenue is recognized when funds are used for designated program purposes. Deferred revenue is included in Accrued Liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets (Note 11).

Advertising Costs

In accordance with SOP 93-7, “Reporting on Advertising Costs,” the Company expenses the production costs of advertising as incurred. The cost of media advertising is expensed when the advertising takes place. Total advertising costs, included in Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, were $343.4 million, $335.4 million, and $288.4 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Operating Leases

The Company evaluates the impact of rent escalation clauses and lease incentives, including rent abatements and tenant improvement allowances included in its operating leases. Rent escalation clauses and lease incentives are considered in determining total rent expense to be recognized during the term of the lease, which begins on the date the Company takes control of the leased space. Renewal options are considered by evaluating the overall term of the lease.

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the

F-92

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Pension and postretirement plans

The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension and postretirement plans within the framework of in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits,” and SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.” The plans are actuarially evaluated, which includes the use of several) assumptions. Critical assumptions for qualified pension plans include the discount rate and the expected rate of return on plan assets (for qualified pension plans), which are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. Other assumptions involve demographic factors such as retirement, mortality, turnover and the rate of compensation increases. The Company evaluates assumptions annually and modifies the assumptions as appropriate.

The Company uses a discount rate to determine the present value of its future benefit obligations. The discount rate is based on matching the duration of other corporate bond pools to the expected benefit payment stream.

To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, the Company considers the current and expected assets allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. Any difference between actual and expected plan experience, including asset return experience in excess of the 10% corridor around the larger of assets or liabilities, is recognized in the net periodic pension calculation over the expected average employee future service, approximately 9 years. The gains and losses of certain smaller nonqualified pension plans are recognized immediately in the year in which they occur.

The Company immediately recognizes a net settlement loss for previously unrecognized losses when it makes substantial excess pension plan payments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Staff Positions No. 115-1 and 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (FSP SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1). FSP SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1 address the determination of when an investment is considered impaired and whether impairment is temporary. These pronouncements provide a three- step process for determining and accounting for other-than-temporary impairment, as well as disclosure requirements for reporting unrealized losses. FSP SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1 are effective for the first reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted FSP SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1 on October 1, 2005. Additional disclosures required under the pronouncements are included in Note 7. The adoption of FSP SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1 did not have an impact to the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Note 3—Cumulative Effect of Change in Adoption of Accounting Principle

Investment in Visa International

During 2005, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force No. 02-14, “Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other Than Common Stock” (EITF 02-14). EITF 02-14

F-93

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

provides guidance related to investments where the investor has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee and where the investment conveys rights and privileges substantially similar to common stock. EITF 02-14 defines criteria for evaluating whether an investment is “in-substance” common stock. Investments meeting these criteria are accounted for under the equity method if significant influence is deemed to exist.

Visa U.S.A.’s influence over Visa International is demonstrated by its representation on Visa International’s Board of Directors, significant related party transactions, and technological interdependence. Dividend and dissolution rights are based upon cumulative volume-based service fees paid by members to Visa International since inception, as a percentage of total volume based service fees received. Therefore, the percentage of equity ownership fluctuates over time.

In accordance with the provisions of EITF 02-14, the Company recorded the cumulative effect of its equity in earnings of Visa International on prior years through fiscal 2004 of $95.7 million (net of taxes of $54.1 million) in income during fiscal 2005. The amount recorded represents a 33 percent share in Visa International accumulated equity in fiscal 2004. The effect of the change in fiscal 2005 was to increase Income Before Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle by $9.5 million and Net Income by $105.2 million. These equity estimates are based on a conservative interpretation of “volume-based” service fees. Pro forma amounts on the Consolidated Statements of Operations reflect the impact on prior year results as if the accounting change had been in effect during the periods presented.

Summarized consolidated financial information for Visa International was as follows:

	As of September 30
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Current Assets	$	1,705,691	$	1,468,835
Facilities and equipment, net		162,617		173,179
Other assets		144,231		125,942
Total assets	$	2,012,539	$	1,767,956
Current Liabilities	$	1,315,511	$	1,148,174
Long-term debt and other liabilities		90,748		84,336
Equity		606,280		535,446
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,012,539	$	1,767,956
	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Total operating revenues	$	1,262,555	$	1,147,430
Total operating expenses		1,242,109		1,045,829
Non-operating income, net		78,511		40,469
Provision for income taxes		29,202		58,869
Net income	$	69,755	$	83,201

F-94

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Volume and Support Agreements

During 2004, the Company changed its method of amortizing volume and support agreements with payment terms that are predominantly based on sales volumes. The Company considers any contract over $10 million where greater than 60 percent of the payments are based on payments volume to be predominantly payments volume-based.

For these contracts, the Company has adopted an amortization methodology based on forecasted payments volume and eliminated the straight-line method. This new method of accounting was adopted to more accurately attribute contract acquisition costs to the related payments volume-based revenue.

The Company accounted for the change in the basis of amortization as a change in accounting principle. The cumulative effect of the change on prior years through fiscal 2003 was $6.2 million (net of taxes of $4.5 million) and is included in income in fiscal 2004. The effect of the change in fiscal 2004 was to increase Income Before Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle by $11.8 million and Net Income by $5.5 million. Pro forma amounts on the Consolidated Statements of Operations reflect the impact on prior year results as if the change in basis of amortization had been in effect during the periods presented.

The Company also changed the period of amortization for all volume and support agreements to contract term. Previously, contracts were amortized over the shorter of contract term or estimated life of the underlying card. Based on historical experience, contract term better reflects the useful life of volume and support agreements. The Company accounted for this change as a change in accounting estimate. The result of this change in accounting estimate was an increase in net income in fiscal 2004 of $7.4 million.

Note 4—Inovant, Inc. and Inovant LLC

On September 30, 2005, Inovant, Inc. sold a 10 percent interest in Inovant LLC to Visa Europe and a 6 percent interest to Visa International and its Central and Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa (CEMEA) region at a price equivalent to the founders’ cost, which was below the book value of underlying equity in fiscal 2005. Inovant, Inc.’s ownership interest in Inovant LLC, previously 85 percent, was reduced to 69 percent.

Inovant LLC net equity at the time of sale of these minority interests was $97.8 million; the carrying value of the 16 percent minority interest sold was $15.6 million. Cash contributions by new minority owners totaled $2.4 million. Cash contributions were set below book value to compensate new minority owners and settle a dispute with them concerning the earnings of and distributions from Inovant LLC since January 1, 2003. In consideration of their mutual release from claims with respect to these matters, Visa U.S.A. also made payments totaling $3.9 million to Visa Europe and Visa International. These payments and the difference of $13.2 million between cash contributions and the book value of minority interests sold were reflected in Litigation Provision on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations in fiscal 2005.

Note 5—Visa International, Visa Canada, Visa Europe

Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe are all separately incorporated entities. The Company pays expenses to Visa International and earns revenues from Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe.

Visa U.S.A. Inc. has the rights to various designs and marks by virtue of its membership in Visa International. Visa International is a membership corporation, which administers a worldwide payment system through various card products, automated teller machines, point-of-sale devices, and travelers checks, which are identified by the Visa Brand Mark, Visa Point-of-Sale Graphic, or familiar three-band Visa Flag, and various other designs and marks.

F-95

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

The Company pays fees to Visa International, based on retail sales volume, exclusive of online PIN-based debit, for services primarily related to global brand management, global product enhancements, and global electronic payment systems. Voting rights in Visa International are based on annual payment service volume. Dividend and dissolution rights are based on cumulative service fees paid to Visa International. Visa U.S.A. members accounted for approximately 35.5 percent, 35.9 percent, and 37.9 percent of Visa International’s annual volume during fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Under current Visa International bylaws, no more than eight directors from the Visa U.S.A. membership can be elected or appointed to the current twenty-three-member Visa International Board of Directors. Amendment of the Visa International bylaws relating to allocation of directors requires an affirmative vote of at least 90 percent of the total membership of the Board of Directors.

A summary of the major expenses paid to Visa International is as follows:

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006		2005		2004
	(in thousands)
Visa International fees	$	159,264	$	168,455	$	196,297
Network and EDP services		2,645		2,392		2,246
Total	$	161,909	$	170,847	$	198,543

Visa U.S.A. Inc. operates a proprietary network, VisaNet, that links issuers and acquirers for transaction processing services. Processing services are provided through Visa’s majority-owned subsidiary, Inovant LLC. The Company provides processing and development services and various license and usage rights to Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe, in accordance with service agreements with these entities. A summary of Data Processing Fees and Other Revenues received from Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe is as follows:

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006		2005		2004
	(in thousands)
Visa International	$	215,307	$	203,495	$	255,289
Visa Canada		19,104		18,596		18,563
Visa Europe		64,738		58,127		9,914
Total	$	299,149	$	280,218	$	283,766

The net balances for related party services due to the Company, presented below, are recorded in Accounts Receivable and Prepaid and Other Current Assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

	As of September 30
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Visa International	$	30,969	$	28,711
Visa Canada	$	1,718	$	1,484
Visa Europe	$	4,985	$	4,701

As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had receivables of $20.0 million and $16.4 million, respectively, from Visa International related to income taxes. This balance is included in Other Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

F-96

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

The Company has an uncommitted credit facility with Visa International whereby the Company or Visa International may provide each other short-term financing with a maximum term of five business days. Neither the Company nor Visa International has the obligation to lend to or to borrow from the other company. There were no outstanding balances as of September 30, 2006 or September 30, 2005 under this arrangement.

Note 6—Prepaid and Other Current Assets

Prepaid and Other Current Assets is comprised of the following:

	As of September 30
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Member collateral	$	51,042	$	50,248
Prepaid customer support		23,593		—
Non-trade receivables		19,849		19,436
Prepaid maintenance		18,042		9,862
Interest receivable		14,131		8,850
Prepaid other		7,482		5,495
Restricted time deposits		4,805		5,562
Prepaid pension		4,081		38,104
Other		1,874		737
Total	$	144,899	$	138,294

Note 7—Investments

Available-for-sale investment securities, which are recorded at fair value, consist of marketable debt securities issued by government-sponsored entities, tax-exempt municipal bonds, and mutual fund investments in equity securities. The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale securities are as follows:

	As of September 30, 2006
	Available-for-Sale
	Amortized Cost		Gross Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Government-sponsored entities	$	897,648	$	170	$	2,519	$	895,299
Tax-exempt municipal bonds		248,799		570		402		248,967
Equity securities		29,906		2,125		556		31,475
Total	$	1,176,353	$	2,865	$	3,477	$	1,175,741
	As of September 30, 2005
	(in thousands)
Government-sponsored entities	$	756,512	$	—	$	6,314	$	750,198
Tax-exempt municipal bonds		217,533		218		426		217,325
Equity securities		30,631		2,274		408		32,497
Total	$	1,004,676	$	2,492	$	7,148	$	1,000,020

F-97

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

The contractual maturity of available-for-sale debt securities regardless of their balance sheet classification is as follows:

	As of September 30, 2006
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due within one year	$	629,801	$	628,976
Due in one to five years		516,646		515,290
Total	$	1,146,447	$	1,144,266

Investments with a fair market value less than cost as of September 30, 2006 are as follows:

	12 Months or Less				Greater Than 12 Months				Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
	(in thousands)
Government-sponsored entities	$	278,099	$	667	$	344,248	$	1,852	$	622,347	$	2,519
Tax-exempt municipal bonds		64,782		199		36,681		203		101,463		402
Equity securities		5,628		144		1,969		412		7,597		556
Total	$	348,509	$	1,010	$	382,898	$	2,467	$	731,407	$	3,477

The unrealized losses on investments in government-sponsored entities and tax-exempt municipal bonds are caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the par value of the initial issuance of the securities. As of September 30, 2006, a total of 89 investments in government-sponsored entities and tax-exempt municipal bonds are in an unrealized loss position. Because management has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be to maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2006.

Equity securities primarily consist of mutual fund investments related to various employee compensation plans. For these plans, employees bear the risk of market fluctuations. Losses experienced on these equity investments are offset by reductions in personnel expense. Unrealized losses on equity securities were caused by changes in market conditions. As of September 30, 2006, a total of 8 fund investments are in an unrealized loss position. The Company has not identified any events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of investments in equity securities. Based on an evaluation of the near-term prospects of these investments and management’s ability and intent to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2006.

Note 8—Investments In Joint Ventures

Real Estate Joint Ventures

The Company and Visa International invest in joint ventures that own, lease, develop, and operate all facilities and properties used jointly by Visa U.S.A. and Visa International.

F-98

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

The following represents Visa U.S.A.’s investments in the joint ventures, and is included in Other Assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets:

	Ownership Percentage		As of September 30
			2006		2005
			(in thousands)
Visa Resources	50.0	%	$	2,162	$	2,016
Visa Land Development I, L.P.	49.5	%		10,673		10,012
Visa Land Development II, L.P.	49.5	%		8,652		9,381
Visa Land Management Inc.	50.0	%		367		352
Visa Land Management II, Inc.	50.0	%		165		156
Total			$	22,019	$	21,917

Visa Resources, a California General Partnership, manages and invests in or leases premises and equipment used jointly by its general partners, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International. Visa Land Management Inc. and Visa Land Management II, Inc. manage the interests of Visa Land Development I, L.P. (VLD I) and Visa Land Development II, L.P. (VLD II), respectively, in owned real estate.

Summarized combined financial information for the joint ventures was as follows:

	As of September 30
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Current assets	$	14,422	$	14,419
Premises and equipment, net		84,055		86,468
Other assets		1,176		1,093
Total assets	$	99,653	$	101,980
Current liabilities	$	6,616	$	5,632
Other liabilities		1,679		1,519
Debt		46,930		50,605
Equity		44,428		44,224
Total liabilities and equity	$	99,653	$	101,980

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006		2005		2004
	(in thousands)
Total revenues	$	81,912	$	84,327	$	86,800
Total expenses		81,654		84,139		86,605
Net Income	$	258	$	188	$	195

In September 1994 and 1995, VLD I and VLD II entered into Note Purchase Agreements. Outstanding notes for VLD I and VLD II have an interest rate of 8.28 percent and 7.83 percent, and mature in September 2014 and 2015, respectively. Debt issuance and other costs totaling $3.0 million are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the notes, which approximates amortization under the effective interest method. Interest

F-99

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

expense on the outstanding notes in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $4.1 million, $4.4 million, and $4.6 million, respectively. The future principal debt payments for these notes are listed below.

For the Years Ending September 30	(in thousands)
2007	$	4,070
2008		4,410
2009		4,779
2010		5,178
2011		5,611
Thereafter		23,586
Total		47,634
Less: unamortized debt issuance and other costs		(704	)
Total debt	$	46,930

Visa Resources charges the combined costs of facilities and equipment to the Company and Visa International based primarily upon the percentage of the total square footage occupied by each entity in the shared premises. In fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company was allocated 83 percent, 81 percent, and 80 percent of these expenses, respectively.

As of September 30, 2006, combined total future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with original terms of more than one year are listed below.

For the Years Ending September 30	(in thousands)
2007	$	3,442
2008		2,082
2009		2,071
2010		2,083
2011		2,120
Thereafter		177
Total lease commitments	$	11,975

Vital Processing Services L.L.C.

In 1996, Merchant Processing Holdings, Inc. (MPH) entered into a joint venture with Total System Services, Inc. (TSYS) to form Vital Processing Services L.L.C. (Vital) in exchange for capital contributions of $4.0 million and software with a book value of $3.5 million. In January 2005, Visa U.S.A. and MPH entered into an agreement with TSYS to sell the Company’s 50 percent equity interest in Vital for a price of $95.0 million. The transaction closed on March 1, 2005. MPH’s 50 percent equity interest was zero in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The $42.0 million difference between the sale price and the Company’s equity interest in Vital at the time of sale of $53.0 million was recognized as a gain and is included in Investment Income, Net in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

F-100

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Note 9—Facilities, Equipment, and Software, Net

Facilities, Equipment, and Software, Net consisted of the following:

	As of September 30
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Land, buildings, and improvements	$	88,358	$	86,073
Furniture, fixtures, and leasehold improvements		42,511		41,600
Computer and other equipment		362,093		495,307
Software
Internally-developed		96,920		86,739
Purchased		101,757		148,953
Construction-in-progress		20,375		36,739
Total facilities, equipment, and software		712,014		895,411
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		431,115		575,203
Facilities, equipment, and software, net	$	280,899	$	320,208

In fiscal 2006, the Company terminated a software development project designed to develop an exception management solution for debit processing that would replace its legacy Transaction Exception System. The Company consolidated all exception management solutions under its Visa Resolve OnLine platform, a web-based transaction dispute management program. This decision eliminated the need for a separate platform for debit exception processing. As a result, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $3.5 million in May 2006 for work completed to date. At the time of this decision, the asset was still in development and included in construction-in-progress. The impairment charge is reflected in Network, EDP, and Communications and Professional and Consulting Fees on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations in fiscal 2006.

The Company entered into various equipment capital leases during 2005. The total amount capitalized was $11.1 million as of September 30, 2005. Accumulated depreciation as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $3.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The Company’s future obligations related to these capital leases are discussed in Note 17.

In 2005, the Company identified certain components of its legacy Visa access point technology where future use of the components was unlikely due to anticipated routine upgrades of access point technology. As a result, the Company recognized a full impairment of $0.7 million for these components in Network, EDP, and Communications on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in fiscal 2005.

In 2005 the Company also identified data storage equipment that became obsolete due to adoption of a more cost-effective alternative to store this data. The Company does not have an alternative use for the equipment. As a result, the Company recognized a full impairment of $0.6 million in Network, EDP, and Communications on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in fiscal 2005.

In 2003, the Company deployed Smart Rewards Platform (SRP) Software and related development costs were capitalized. In March 2004, as a result of a merchant decision to discontinue the Smart Rewards program and a shift in the Company’s strategy with respect to chip-based products, the Company recognized a full

F-101

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

impairment of $5.0 million of the SRP asset and other software licenses purchased as part of SRP development to Administrative and Other Expense. Related amortization charged to Network, EDP, and Communications in the Consolidated Statements of Operations was $0.6 million in fiscal 2004.

Depreciation and amortization expense for facilities, equipment, and software totaled $123.4 million, $118.5 million, and $98.3 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Included in those amounts are amortization expense on internally developed software of $20.1 million, $22.4 million, and $16.6 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Future amortization of internally developed software is shown on the following table:

For the Years Ending September 30	(in thousands)
2007	$	15,176
2008		11,615
2009		7,039
2010		2,358
2011		912
Total	$	37,100

Note 10—Intangible Assets

On January 31, 2003 the Company entered into an exclusive ten-year licensing agreement with a member. The agreement granted Visa patent and know-how rights, which allowed the Company to market and distribute Mini Cards within the United States. The license granted was sub-licensable.

In June 2006 the Company assessed a low probability of future incremental cash flows from the Mini Card, given the Company’s strategic focus on developing next-generation payment platforms and services, and minimal Mini Card issuance by Visa members. If the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of an asset, an impairment loss is recognized. The loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value calculated using the present value of estimated net future cash flows.

As a result, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $13.2 million in June 2006 for the net carrying value of the asset. The expense is reflected in Administrative and Other on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Related amortization, also included in Administrative and Other, was $1.5 million, $2.0 million, and $2.0 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

As of September 30, 2006 the Company has no intangible assets (other than capitalized software) on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of September 30, 2005, the carrying value of the license was $14.7 million, net of accumulated amortization of $5.3 million.

F-102

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Note 11—Accrued Liabilities

Accrued Liabilities is comprised of the following:

	As of September 30
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Accrued operating expenses	$	154,096	$	87,676
Restricted issuer liability		100,414		230,300
Member collateral		51,042		50,248
Deferred revenues		50,780		6,626
Accrued discounts		36,105		27,149
Accrued taxes		9,576		46,328
Accrued other		4,802		4,826
Total	$	406,815	$	453,153

Note 12—Restricted Assets and Liabilities

Member Collateral

Under the corporate bylaws, Visa indemnifies issuing and acquiring members for settlement losses suffered by reason of the failure of any other member to honor drafts processed in accordance with the Operating Regulations. To reduce this risk, the Company obtains collateral from members, as needed, in order to ensure a member’s performance of its settlement obligations. This collateral is generally in the form of cash equivalents, securities, and letters of credit. The Company held collateral as follows:

	As of September 30
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Cash equivalents	$	51,042	$	50,224
Pledged securities at market		118,020		107,608
Letters of credit		92		165

The Cash Equivalents are reflected in Current Assets and Current Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as they are held in escrow in the Company’s name. The Securities and Letters of Credit are held by third parties in trust for the Company and the members, and have been excluded from the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Utilities Card Acceptance Program

In April 2005, the Company introduced a program that supports card product usage for selected utilities that meet certain acceptance standards. The program is funded by debit issuers at the time of settlement, to support efforts on their behalf to secure utility merchant acceptance and promote debit products usage. Under current program rules, unused funds, if any, would be returned to debit issuers at the conclusion of the program. The balance for the program was $2.3 million and $0.2 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and is reflected in Cash and Cash Equivalents, Investment Securities, and Accrued Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

F-103

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

In August 2006, the Company announced its intention to end the Utilities Card Acceptance Program in April 2007. Under current program rules, unused funds from the program, if any, will be returned to issuers by September 30, 2007.

Visa Check Card Acceptance Program

In January 2004, the Company introduced a program that supports Visa Check card usage and other business arrangements for selected merchants that meet certain acceptance standards. The program is funded by Visa Check card issuers at the time of settlement, to support efforts on their behalf to secure merchant acceptance and promote card usage. Under current program rules, unused funds, if any, would be returned to issuers at the conclusion of the program.

The balance for the program was $74.5 million and $230.1 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and is reflected in Cash and Cash Equivalents, Investment Securities, and Accrued Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In August 2006, the Company announced its intention to end the Visa Check Card Acceptance Program in April 2007. Under current program rules, unused funds from the program, if any, will be returned to issuers by September 30, 2007.

Cash Collateral for Standby Letter of Credit

In May 2004, the Company obtained an irrevocable standby letter of credit (Letter of Credit). The fully collateralized Letter of Credit was established as required by the First Amendment and Waiver to the Company’s Note Purchase Agreements for the benefit of the holders of the Company’s Series A and Series B Notes. During March 2006, certain financial covenant requirements under the First Amendment and Waiver to the Note Purchase Agreements were met. As a result, the Company is no longer obligated to retain a letter of credit. Cash collateral of $0.0 million and $37.6 million were restricted as part of this standby letter of credit and included in Cash and Cash Equivalents on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Note 13—Pension, Postretirement, and Other Benefits

The Company participates in noncontributory defined benefit pension plans, which provide for retirement benefits for Visa U.S.A. Inc. and Visa International employees residing in the United States. The benefits are based on years of service, age, and the employee’s final three years of earnings, and for employees hired after September 30, 2002, the employee’s final five years of earnings. Pension plan expense is accrued as actuarially determined under the Projected Unit Credit Method. The funding policy is to contribute annually no less than the minimum and no more than the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes. The pension plan assets are invested in pooled and mutual funds and separate accounts.

During 2004, the pension plan was amended to limit the maximum leave period that may be taken into account for pension benefit purposes to twenty-four months in aggregate. This amendment did not have a material impact on the Company’s pension liability.

As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, pension obligations were settled totaling $5.3 million and $11.4 million, respectively. In connection with pension obligation settlements, the plan recognized previously

F-104

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

unrecognized net losses on supplemental pension plan assets of $3.1 million, $12.5 million, and $37.5 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Visa U.S.A.’s share of pension plan settlement losses was $1.8 million, $8.9 million, and $25.5 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The net settlement losses on plan assets are recorded in Personnel expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company also participates in a postretirement benefit plan that provides medical benefits for Visa U.S.A. Inc. and Visa International retirees and dependents who meet minimum age and service requirements. Benefits are provided from retirement date until age sixty-five. Retirees must contribute on a monthly basis for the same coverage that is generally available to active employees and their dependents. The Company’s contributions are funded on a current basis.

The following tables provide an aggregate reconciliation of the benefit obligations, plan assets, funded status, and amounts recognized in Visa U.S.A. Inc., and Visa International’s collective financial statements related to the regular retirement plan and the supplemental retirement plan (which primarily covers key executives), and those of the postretirement plan.

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	Measurement Date June 30
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(in thousands)
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation/Accumulated Plan Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation—beginning of year	$	714,968		$	601,160		$	67,125		$	58,067
Service cost		74,025			62,369			6,755			6,027
Interest cost		41,164			40,902			3,621			3,919
Plan amendments		—			—			—			—
Actuarial loss		(93,901	)		80,216			(480	)		1,948
Settlements		2,124			6,853			—			—
Benefit payments		(77,958	)		(76,532	)		(2,938	)		(2,836	)
Benefit obligation—end of year	$	660,422		$	714,968		$	74,083		$	67,125
Accumulated pension benefit obligation	$	487,939		$	451,135		$	—		$	—
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of plan assets—beginning of year	$	493,538		$	416,138		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		39,257			27,968			—			—
Company contribution		59,561			125,964			2,938			2,836
Benefit payments		(77,958	)		(76,532	)		(2,938	)		(2,836	)
Fair value of plan assets—end of year	$	514,398		$	493,538		$	—		$	—
Funded Status:
Funded status—September 30	$	(146,024	)	$	(221,430	)	$	(74,083	)	$	(67,125	)
Unrecognized prior service cost		7,363			8,374			(16,321	)		(20,980	)
Unrecognized actuarial loss		141,661			257,217			25,203			27,688
Contribution between measurement date and year end		461			4,771			932			735
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost	$	3,461		$	48,932		$	(64,269	)	$	(59,682	)
Visa U.S.A. share of prepaid (accrued) benefit cost	$	4,181		$	38,104		$	(50,825	)	$	(46,656	)

F-105

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Net periodic pension and other postretirement plan cost included the following components:

	Pension Benefits									Postretirement Benefits
	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006			2005			2004			2006			2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Service cost	$	74,025		$	62,369		$	62,057		$	6,755		$	6,027		$	5,759
Interest cost		41,164			40,902			35,937			3,621			3,919			3,249
Expected return on assets		(36,133	)		(30,539	)		(25,086	)		—			—			—
Amortization of:
Prior service cost		1,011			1,011			1,011			(4,659	)		(4,659	)		(4,659	)
Actuarial loss		17,317			11,197			12,879			1,804			1,851			1,878
Net periodic pension cost	$	97,384		$	84,940		$	86,798		$	7,521		$	7,138		$	6,227
Settlement charge		3,108			12,490			37,502			—			—			—
Total net benefit cost	$	100,492		$	97,430		$	124,300		$	7,521		$	7,138		$	6,227
Visa U.S.A. share of net periodic pension cost	$	75,431		$	64,673		$	66,275		$	6,154		$	5,749		$	5,032
Visa U.S.A. share of settlement charge	$	1,778		$	8,944		$	25,467		$	—		$	—		$	—

Assumptions used in the accounting for the plans on a weighted-average basis were as follows:

	Measurement Date June 30
	2006		2005		2004
Discount rate for benefit obligation
Pension	6.23	%	5.30	%	6.25	%
Postretirement	6.16	%	5.00	%	6.25	%
Net periodic benefit cost
Pension	5.30	%	6.25	%	6.00	%
Postretirement	5.00	%	6.25	%	6.00	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets	7.50	%	7.50	%	7.50	%
Rate of increase in compensation levels for:
Benefit obligation	5.50	%	5.50	%	5.50	%
Net periodic benefit cost	5.50	%	5.50	%	5.50	%

Two of the principal components of the net periodic pension calculation are the discount rate on future liabilities and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.

The Company uses a “bond duration matching” methodology to calculate the discount rate. Under this approach, the discount rate is determined by projecting the plans’ expected future benefit payments, as defined for the projected benefit obligations, and by discounting those expected payments using an average of yield curves constructed based on a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rate reflects the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves.

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is primarily based on the long-term historical risk and returns associated with each asset class within the portfolio. The expected return is weighted based on the targeted allocation and results in a return rate of 7.5 percent. The use of an expected long-term rate of return on

F-106

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

plan assets may result in pension income returns that are greater or less than the actual returns on plan assets in any given year.

The expected long-term rate of return is intended to approximate the actual long-term rate of return over time. The Company generally holds the expected long-term rate of return constant so the pattern of income and expense recognition more closely matches the more stable pattern of services provided by employees over the life of the Company’s pension obligation. To determine if the expected rate of return is reasonable, the Company considers such factors as:

• The actual return earned on plan assets,

• Historical rates of return on the various asset classes in the plan portfolio,

• Projections of returns on various asset classes, and

• Current and prospective capital market conditions and economic forecasts.

Any difference between actual and expected plan experience including asset return experience in excess of a 10 percent corridor around the larger of assets or liabilities is recognized in the net periodic pension calculation over the expected average future working lifetime of the current employees, which is currently 8.6 years.

Company contributions under the pension plans included $59.6 million and $126.0 million paid from employer assets in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. Employer contributions under the postretirement plan include $2.9 million and $2.8 million paid from employer assets in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The pension plan’s weighted-average asset allocations as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 by asset category were as follows:

	Target Allocation		Permissible Range				Actual Allocation
Asset Class			Minimum		Maximum		2006		2005
Equity Securities	65	%	50	%	80	%	68	%	68	%
Fixed Income	30	%	25	%	35	%	30	%	30	%
Other	5	%	0	%	7	%	2	%	2	%
Total	100	%					100	%	100	%

Plan assets are managed with a long-term perspective to ensure that there is an adequate level of assets to support benefit payments to participants over the life of the pension plan. Plan assets are managed by external investment managers. Investment manager performance is measured against benchmarks for each asset class on a quarterly basis. An independent consultant assists management with investment manager selections and performance evaluations. Plan assets are broadly diversified to minimize the risk of loss. The other category includes cash that is available to meet expected benefit payments and expenses.

F-107

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Expected Cash Flows

Information about the expected cash flows for the pension and postretirement benefit plans follows:

	Pension Benefits		Visa U.S.A.’s Portion		Postretirement Benefits		Visa U.S.A.’s Portion
	(in thousands)
Expected employer contributions
2007	$	51,000	$	40,300	$	3,700	$	2,600
Expected benefit payments
2007	$	55,800	$	43,400	$	3,700	$	2,600
2008		62,800		50,200		4,600		3,300
2009		71,000		55,700		5,500		4,100
2010		76,400		61,400		6,500		4,900
2011		83,800		67,800		7,300		5,700
2012–2016		488,400		391,800		47,700		38,400

Expected contributions include pension benefits of $51.0 million and other postretirement benefits of $3.7 million expected to be paid from employer assets in fiscal 2007.

The assumed annual rate of future increases in per capita cost of health benefits for the postretirement plan was 7 percent in fiscal 2006. The rate is then assumed to decrease 1 percent for 1 year, reaching 6 percent in fiscal 2007. These trend rates reflect management’s expectations of future rates. Increasing the healthcare cost trend by 1 percent would increase the postretirement accumulated plan benefit obligation by $1.1 million and service and interest cost by $0.4 million. Decreasing the healthcare cost trend by 1 percent would decrease the postretirement accumulated plan benefit obligation by $1.0 million and the service and interest cost by $0.3 million.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” which amends SFAS 87 and SFAS 106.

The Company participates in a defined contribution plan, which covers substantially all of its employees and Visa International employees residing in the United States. Personnel costs included $24.1 million, $22.9 million, and $26.1 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, for expenses attributable to the Company’s employees under the plan. The Company’s contributions to this plan are funded on a current basis and the related expenses are recognized in the period that the payroll expenses are incurred.

During fiscal 2004, the Company made amendments to its defined contribution plan. The Company reduced employer contributions while increasing the maximum covered pay-percentage of employee contributions. The Company eliminated the minimum service requirement for participation in the plan and accelerated the vesting period. Finally, the Company eliminated the credited service requirement for rehires. The impact of these changes is expected to reduce personnel costs in future periods.

The Company has employee incentive plans under which cash awards may be made annually based on performance results. Personnel costs included $106.1 million, $93.5 million, and $94.1 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, for expenses attributable to the incentive plans.

F-108

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Note 14—Debt

The Company held debt as follows:

	As of September 30
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
4.64% Senior secured notes—Series A principal and interest payments payable quarterly, due 12/2007	$	33,000		$	59,400
5.60% Senior secured notes—Series B principal and interest payments payable quarterly, due 12/2012		42,500			49,300
Unamortized debt issuance costs		(1,881	)		(2,742	)
Total debt	$	73,619		$	105,958

In December 2002, the Company issued $200 million in Senior Secured Notes with maturity dates of five and ten years. The notes are collateralized by the Company’s Colorado facility, which consists of two data centers and an office building, in addition to processing assets and developed software. These assets are included in Facilities, Equipment, and Software, Net and have net carrying values of $147.7 million and $172.8 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2006 and 2005.

In May 2004, the Company executed the First Amendment and Waiver to the Note Purchase Agreement (First Amendment) associated with these Senior Secured Notes. Under terms of the amendment, interest rates increased and a letter of credit was added to existing collateral. Interest rates increased from 4.64 to 5.39 percent on Series A Notes and from 5.60 to 6.35 percent on Series B Notes.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, certain financial covenant requirements under the First Amendment were met. As a result, as of April 1, 2006 the interest rates on these Notes decreased from 5.39 percent to 4.64 percent on Series A Notes and from 6.35 percent to 5.60 percent on Series B Notes. In addition, the Company is no longer obligated to retain a letter of credit required under the First Amendment (Note 12). Certain other financial covenant requirements associated with net income, liquidity, and sales are also no longer required. At September 30, 2006, the company was in compliance with financial covenants included in the original notes including maintenance of minimum total accumulated net revenues of $300 million and certain leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios.

Annual maturities on debt are as follows:

For the Years Ending September 30	(in thousands)
2007	$	33,200
2008		13,400
2009		6,800
2010		6,800
2011		6,800
Thereafter		8,500
Total debt	$	75,500

The fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for similar issues. The estimated fair value of the Company’s debt as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $73.7 million and $107.9

F-109

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

million, respectively, which differs from the carrying amounts of $75.5 million and $108.7 million, respectively, included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Note 15—Investment Income, Net

Investment Income, Net is comprised of the following:

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006		2005		2004
	(in thousands)
Interest and dividend income on investment securities	$	66,857	$	31,306	$	13,174
Realized gain on investment securities		1,473		7,732		750
Gain on sale of joint venture		—		41,968		—
Investment income, net	$	68,330	$	81,006	$	13,924

Note 16—Income Taxes

The Company’s income tax expense consisted of the following:

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006			2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Current:
U.S. federal	$	234,895		$	161,761		$	41,690
State and local		(15,187	)		(60,295	)		22,608
Total current taxes	$	219,708		$	101,466		$	64,298
Deferred:
U.S. federal		33,750			(11,079	)		66,422
State and local		(2,120	)		92,909			1,838
Total deferred taxes		31,630			81,830			68,260
Total income tax expense	$	251,338		$	183,296		$	132,558

F-110

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

The Company’s net deferred tax asset was related to the following temporary differences:

	As of September 30
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
Deferred Tax Asset:
Compensation and benefits	$	23,713		$	23,009
Investments in debt & equity securities (SFAS 115)		620			2,104
Investments in joint ventures		29,700			34,376
Litigation settlement		369,590			442,944
Research and development		—			6,105
Non-member programs		14,992			16,909
Member programs		18,172			—
Other		20,795			7,487
Gross deferred tax asset		477,582			532,934
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		—			(6,105	)
Deferred tax asset		477,582			526,829
Deferred Tax Liability:
Facilities and equipment		(14,098	)		(24,642	)
Investment in Visa International		(68,901	)		(63,475	)
Member programs		—			(9,394	)
State tax		(7,313	)		(6,590	)
Other		(66	)		(2,410	)
Deferred tax liability		(90,378	)		(106,511	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	387,204		$	420,318

The Company purchased the stock of Inovant, Inc. on January 1, 2003. The fiscal 2006 and 2005 deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the addition of deferred tax assets and liabilities from Inovant, Inc. A valuation allowance had previously been established for the state research and development credit carry-forwards acquired as part of the Inovant, Inc. transaction since the Company believed it more likely than not that those credits would not be realized. Based upon audit results related to research and development at the Federal level which impacted these credits, a corresponding adjustment has been made to the deferred tax asset and the associated valuation allowance on these underlying credits as of September 30, 2005. In fiscal 2006, it was determined that it was not probable that the position that gave rise to the deferred tax asset relating to a state filing methodology would be sustainable. Accordingly, both the underlying deferred tax assets and the accompanying valuation allowance were reversed.

In fiscal 2005, the Company conducted a series of vendor audits and recorded adjustments to current and prior years. As a result of these vendor adjustments, a deferred tax liability of $2.3 million was recorded related to prior years.

In fiscal 2006, the Company performed a historical analysis of its deferred tax assets and liabilities. As a result of this analysis, adjustments were made to deferred tax assets and liabilities. The net effect of the adjustments is approximately $3.3 million, which is primarily attributable to fixed asset adjustments related to years prior to fiscal 2002.

F-111

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

The Company’s gross deferred tax asset is appropriately stated at a level which the Company believes is more likely than not to be realized in the future, primarily from the generation of future taxable income based on levels of past taxable income.

Income tax expense (benefit) on net unrealized gains and losses on investment securities is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and was $1.5 million, ($3.2) million, and ($0.1) million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

The Company recorded a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle related to its investment in Visa International in fiscal 2005. A deferred tax liability was recorded related to the cumulative adjustment of approximately $54.1 million (Note 3).

The income tax expense differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes as a result of the following differences:

	For the Years Ended September 30
	2006					2005					2004
	Dollars			Percent		Dollars			Percent		Dollars			Percent
	(in thousands)
U.S. federal tax	$	252,636		35.0	%	$	159,686		35.0	%	$	124,275		35.0	%
State taxes, net of federal benefit		(11,249	)	(1.6	)%		21,199		4.6	%		16,153		4.5	%
Other, net		15,522		2.2	%		5,298		1.2	%		(5,645	)	(1.6	)%
Minority interest—not subject to tax		(5,571	)	(0.8	)%		(2,887	)	(0.6	)%		(2,225	)	(0.6	)%
Income tax expense	$	251,338		34.8	%	$	183,296		40.2	%	$	132,558		37.3	%

Income taxes payable of $7.9 million and $42.9 million are included in Accrued Liabilities as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Income taxes receivable of $5.6 million and $2.3 million are included in Prepaid and Other Current Assets as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The difference in the state tax rate between fiscal 2006 and 2005 results primarily from partial results of a California examination relating to the proper application of a previously issued ruling from the state.

F-112

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Note 17—Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company leases certain premises and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with varying expiration dates. Total rent expense, excluding rent paid to Visa Resources (Note 8), incurred by the Company was $30.7 million, $32.5 million, and $43.2 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Future minimum commitments on remaining operating leases with original terms of more than one year are as follows:

For the Years Ending September 30	Premises		Equipment & License Agreements		Total
	(in thousands)
2007	$	11,399	$	19,908	$	31,307
2008		7,259		15,250		22,509
2009		5,348		1,598		6,946
2010		5,313		—		5,313
2011		4,121		—		4,121
Thereafter		1,122		—		1,122
Total lease commitments	$	34,562	$	36,756	$	71,318

The Company leases a data center in which at the expiration of the lease, the Company will incur certain restoration costs such as the costs to remove leasehold improvements. The carrying amount of this asset retirement obligation was $0.0 million and $3.2 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company recorded a charge of $0.1 million in accretion expense in fiscal 2006.

In March 2003, the Company approved a data center strategy that included a plan to decommission one of its data centers by January 2007. In September 2006, the Company executed a lease termination agreement for the data center facility. The lease termination agreement provides for an expected lease termination date in January 2007 and revised the Company’s restoration obligations under the lease. In addition, there is a one-time lease termination payment of $5.0 million due to the landlord. The exit costs of $5.0 million were recorded in Administrative and Other in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in fiscal 2006.

Capital Leases

The Company entered into capital leases for certain computer equipment during 2005. The Company is financing the acquisition of the underlying assets through the leases, and accordingly they are recorded in the Company’s assets and liabilities. Amortization charges for related assets are included in Network, EDP, and Communications in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Future minimum payments under capital leases are as follows:

For the Years Ending September 30	(in thousands)
2007	$	3,844
2008		3,844
2009		—
2010		—
2011		—
Thereafter		—
Future minimum lease payments		7,688
Less: Imputed interest		393
Present Value of Net Minimum Lease Payments	$	7,295

F-113

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Volume and Support Agreements

The Company has agreements with members and merchants for various programs designed to build sales volume and increase payment product acceptance. These agreements, which range in term from three to ten years, provide card issuance, marketing, and program support based on specific performance requirements. These agreements are designed to encourage member loyalty and to increase overall Visa-branded payment volume, thereby reducing unit transaction processing costs and increasing brand awareness for all Visa members.

The Company is currently a party to other long-term contractual arrangements ranging from two to eight years. These contracts are designed to help the Company increase Visa-branded cards and volumes. Over the life of these contracts, the Company is required to make payments in exchange for certain advertising and promotional rights.

Payments made and obligations incurred under these contracts are included in Volume and Support Agreements, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s obligation under these contracts is amortized as a reduction to revenue over the period of benefit. Amortization is recorded in Volume and Support Agreements and in Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The expected reduction of future earnings resulting from these agreements is estimated as follows:

For the Years Ending September 30	Volume and Support Agreements
	Member1		Other		Total
	(in thousands)
2007	$	399,567	$	155,271	$	554,838
2008		415,512		99,700		515,212
2009		395,296		74,653		469,949
2010		307,464		69,503		376,967
2011		199,718		62,573		262,291
Thereafter		118,543		81,004		199,547
Total volume and support agreements	$	1,836,100	$	542,704	$	2,378,804

¹ Members represented on the Board of Directors account for $756.9 million of the total expected contract value.

In connection with these contractual commitments, the Company has an obligation to spend certain minimum amounts for advertising and marketing promotion over the contract terms. The Company’s maximum advertising and marketing commitment through June 2013 is $189.4 million.

Settlement Indemnification

Under the Visa U.S.A. bylaws, the Company indemnifies issuing and acquiring members for settlement losses suffered by reason of the failure of any other member to honor drafts, travelers checks, or other instruments processed in accordance with the Operating Regulations. Visa International is the Company’s settlement agent. Under the Visa International bylaws, the Company partially indemnifies Visa International from losses due to the failure of a member. The term and the amount of the indemnity are not limited. The Company is responsible for losses up to $1.0 million plus .003 percent of the Company’s sales volume for the year preceding the loss, or approximately $36.7 million in fiscal 2006. Excess worldwide losses are allocated among Visa entities based on their proportionate share of total sales volume.

F-114

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

The Company provides data processing services for deposit access products, including comprehensive support for the following payment products: the Visa Check card, Visa Buxx, and the Interlink network. The Company also supports point-of sale check service drivers at over 1,000 ATMs and provides gateway access to all major U.S. payment networks.

The Company is subject to settlement risk for credit and debit transactions due to the difference in timing between the payment transaction date and subsequent settlement. The Company has global risk management policies and procedures that include risk standards to provide a framework for managing the Company’s settlement exposure. To reduce the risk of settlement exposure, the Company obtains collateral from members, as needed, to ensure a member’s performance of its settlement obligations.

As of September 30, 2006, management estimated its liability under credit and debit indemnification obligations by multiplying third-party estimates of the probability of bank failure by member average daily volumes and estimated average number of days to settle. The resulting probability-weighted value of the guarantee, after consideration of collateral held and estimated losses in the event of bank failure, was $0.3 million and $1.6 million in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. This amount is reflected in Accrued Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In the event that the Company makes a payment under this guarantee on behalf of a failed member as to which insufficient collateral is available to the Company and the Company borrows to cover settlement payment, member fees may be increased to account for the settlement loss, subject to approval by the Board of Directors. The Company may receive reimbursement from Visa International for such settlement losses above a certain deductible amount pursuant to Visa International bylaws, as discussed above.

Member Advance Deposit Program

In September 2003, the Company introduced a Member Advance Deposit Program whereby members could choose to advance a deposit against their quarterly member service fees. As an incentive for member participation, the amount of the deposit was discounted at 6 percent. Any principal member of Visa U.S.A. could elect to participate in the Advance Deposit Program. All advance deposits under the program, totaling $536.4 million, were received by October 2003. One-sixteenth of the member’s total undiscounted deposit amount is applied as a credit against the next sixteen quarterly operating certificate fees otherwise payable to the Company, commencing with the first quarterly operating certificate filed subsequent to receipt of the member’s initial deposit. As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, the balance of Member Deposits were $137.4 million and $271.5 million, respectively. Application of remaining Member Deposits to quarterly operating certificate fees payable will continue through December 2007.

Indemnification of Visa International

In conjunction with the Inovant, Inc. purchase on January 1, 2003 between Visa U.S.A. and Visa International, the Company agreed to indemnify Visa International in the event of future tax liability in connection with an adverse determination by a Taxing Authority resulting from the sale of stock of Inovant, Inc. The indemnification is effective for ten years and extends through thirty years or statute of limitations in the event of a tax extension for the year of the stock repurchase. Maximum potential future payments under the guarantee are difficult to assess due to the inability to predict future adverse tax determinations by a Taxing Authority and the absence of exposure limits. Management has assessed the probability of making such payments in the future as remote, based on current known facts. Consequently, the maximum probability-weighted liability is considered immaterial and no liability has been accrued.

F-115

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Indemnification of Real Estate Joint Ventures

In August 2004, Visa U.S.A. agreed with VLD I and VLD II that Visa U.S.A. would assume financial responsibility for any prepayment penalty incurred by VLD I and VLD II in the event that Note Purchase Agreements of these organizations are called because of actions that are the sole responsibility of Visa U.S.A. Management has assessed the probability of making payment on the guarantee as remote, based on current known facts, and as such, no liability has been recorded. The maximum estimated pre-payment penalty in the event that the Note Purchase Agreements are paid before maturity is $3.0 million.

Holographic Magnetic Card Reimbursement

In January 2006, the Company introduced a new card design with holographic magnetic stripe technology as part of its global brand architecture initiative. Limited technical problems were noted with regard to the use of the card and therefore the Company advised its members to discontinue its manufacture and distribution. The Company is a committed partner to its members and has established a reimbursement process for members and card vendors that have incurred production and issuance costs. As of September 30, 2006, the Company has an accrual of $23.0 million in Accrued Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This obligation is an estimate of the amount required to reimburse the Company’s members for certain costs they have incurred with regard to the manufacture and distribution of the holographic magnetic card design. This amount may be adjusted as required when members complete their analyses of costs incurred. Members have until December 31, 2006 to file their claims. As of September 30, 2006, $4.9 million in claims have been filed by members and $1.2 million of claims have been paid.

Contingent Gain

On June 30, 2005, the Company exercised warrants to purchase 625,000 shares in WildCard Systems, Inc. (WildCard). Visa’s shares represent approximately 3 percent of shares outstanding. In July 2005, the Company sold its shares to eFunds Corporation (eFunds) as part of eFunds’ cash acquisition of WildCard. The sale resulted in no gain to the Company. However, as provided for in the acquisition, an “earn out” of up to $59.0 million could be paid if the acquired business achieved certain revenue targets in calendar year 2006. Visa’s share in this contingent “earn out” was estimated to be a maximum of $1.9 million. There was no guarantee that these revenue targets would be met, and as such, the gain contingency was not reflected in the Company’s financial statements. In April 2007, the Company concluded that there would be no earn out realized.

Note 18—Legal Matters

Visa is a party to various legal and regulatory proceedings. Some of these proceedings involve complex claims that are subject to substantial uncertainties and unascertainable damages. Accordingly, except as disclosed, the Company has not established reserves related to these proceedings as at this time in the proceedings the matter does not relate to a probable loss and/or amounts are not estimable. Although the Company believes that it has strong defenses for the litigation and regulatory proceedings described below, it could in the future incur judgments or fines or enter into settlements of claims that could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

The Company’s Litigation Provision includes provisions of $22.9 million, $132.3 million, and $36.9 million in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The fiscal 2006 provision is net of an $11.5 million insurance recovery received in fiscal 2006. There was no insurance recovery in 2005 or 2004. The litigation accrual is an estimate and is based on management’s understanding of its litigation profile, the specifics of each case, advice

F-116

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

of counsel to the extent appropriate, and management’s best estimate of incurred loss as of the balance sheet dates. The Company is presently involved in the matters described below and other legal actions. The Company will continue to review the litigation accrual and, if necessary, future refinements to the accrual will be made.

The following table summarizes the activity related to the litigation in fiscal 2006 and 2005:

(in thousands)	2006			2005
Balance as of October 1	$	1,207,920		$	1,262,724
Provision for legal matters		34,385			132,343
Insurance recovery		(11,500	)		—
Interest accretion on settled matters		91,583			98,960
Payments on settled matters		(322,685	)		(286,107	)
Balance as of September 30	$	999,703		$	1,207,920

Rule 2.10(e) Litigation

American Express/Discover

On October 4, 2004, Discover Financial Services, Inc. (Discover) filed an action against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and MasterCard International Incorporated (MasterCard) in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On November 15, 2004, American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (American Express) filed a similar action in the same court against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard, and certain of their member financial institutions. Both complaints seek treble damages and injunctive relief under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, asserting that Visa’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s Competitive Programs Policy (CPP) prevented banks from issuing payment cards on the American Express and Discover networks. Discover also contends that Visa’s “Honor All Cards” rule reinforced the anticompetitive effects of bylaw 2.10(e).

Both lawsuits have been assigned to the district court judge who presided in United States v. Visa (the DOJ Case), in which the Department of Justice challenged bylaw 2.10(e) and the CPP. In the DOJ Case, the court in 2001 enjoined Visa and MasterCard from enacting, enforcing, or maintaining any bylaw, rule, policy, or practice that prohibits members from issuing general purpose or debit cards on any other general purpose card network. In accordance with this court order, Visa U.S.A. repealed bylaw 2.10(e). The court has deferred ruling on whether, or to what extent, it will give collateral estoppel effect in the American Express and Discover cases to factual findings made in the DOJ case.

The defendants moved to dismiss certain claims in the American Express and Discover cases. In the fall of 2005, the court granted MasterCard and Visa International’s motions to dismiss Discover’s attempted monopolization and monopolization claims against them, because Discover did not allege that either MasterCard or Visa International individually had sufficient market share to maintain these claims. The court denied Visa U.S.A.’s analogous motion, however, finding that Discover had alleged sufficient market share as to Visa U.S.A. The court also denied Visa and MasterCard’s motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ debit card claims, ruling that the plaintiffs had properly alleged a debit card market. Visa’s motion to dismiss American Express’s exclusive-dealing claim was also denied.

Fact discovery is scheduled to be completed by May 31, 2007. The majority of documents have been exchanged and depositions are underway. No trial date has been set.

F-117

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

Attridge

On December 8, 2004, a purported consumer class action was filed against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and MasterCard in California state court (Attridge). The complaint asserted claims under California’s Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Law, based in part on Visa’s former bylaw 2.10(e). The Cartwright Act claim, however, was dismissed in May 2006. On October 4, 2006, the court approved a plan for initial discovery, which is now proceeding. No trial date has been set.

Interchange Litigation

Kendall

In October 2004, a class action was filed in United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Visa U.S.A., MasterCard, and several banks (Kendall). The Kendall class purported to represent all merchants that accept Visa- or MasterCard-branded payment cards, and alleged, among other things, that the setting of interchange is unlawful under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. In addition to money damages, the plaintiffs sought to enjoin Visa and MasterCard from setting interchange rates and from allegedly negotiating merchant discount rates with certain merchants. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in April 2005 and stipulated that the suit related only to conduct taking place after January 1, 2004.

On July 25, 2005, the court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice. Plaintiffs filed an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on August 10, 2005. Both sides have fully briefed the appeal, but no date has been set for oral argument.

Multidistrict Litigation Proceedings

In fiscal 2005 and 2006, approximately fifty lawsuits—most of which were asserted as purported class actions—were filed on behalf of merchants who accept payment cards against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard, and other defendants. Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated federal and state antitrust laws by setting interchange rates (among other claims, as described below). The suits seek treble damages for alleged overcharges in merchant discount fees, as well as injunctive and other relief.

On October 19, 2005, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order establishing a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in the Eastern District of New York. The Honorable John H. Gleeson was assigned to coordinate pretrial proceedings in the cases transferred to the MDL. On April 24, 2006, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed, which supersedes the class action complaints filed previously. One additional class action was filed after the date of the consolidated class complaint; it has been conditionally transferred to MDL 1720 but has not yet been made part of the consolidated class. Visa U.S.A. is a defendant in the consolidated class action complaint and nine additional complaints filed on behalf of individual plaintiffs.

The consolidated class action complaint alleges that the setting of interchange violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act; that Visa’s “no surcharge” rule and other alleged Visa rules violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act; and that the rules and interchange together constitute monopolization, violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act and California’s Cartwright Act. The consolidated class action complaint further asserts that Visa ties “Payment Guarantee Services” and “Network Processing Services” to “Payment Card System Services” and engages in exclusive dealing, both in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and that offline debit interchange violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act and California’s Cartwright Act.

F-118

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

The individual complaints include similar claims and also allege that Visa impermissibly ties services for “Premium Credit Cards” to services for other Visa-branded payment cards.

On June 9, 2006, Visa answered the consolidated class action complaint and moved to dismiss in part, or strike, claims for pre- January 1, 2004 damages. The parties are currently engaged in document production, written discovery, and non-substantive depositions. No trial date has been set.

Retailers’ Litigation

Retailers’ Litigation

In 1996, a merchant class action was filed in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York alleging that Visa’s “Honor All Cards” rule and MasterCard’s analogous rule violated federal antitrust laws (In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation, or Retailers’). On June 4, 2003, a settlement agreement was executed. Visa agreed to modify its “Honor All Cards” rule such that, effective January 1, 2004, a merchant may accept only Visa check cards, only Visa credit cards, or both. Visa also agreed to pay approximately $2.0 billion to the merchant class over ten years, among other things. The court approved the settlement on December 19, 2003.

Several objectors appealed the district court’s approval of the settlement agreement. In January 2005, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling. The Court of Appeals held that the settlement releases all claims that were or could have been asserted by the class through December 31, 2003, including claims challenging interchange and bylaw 2.10(e). As such, other pending cases challenging interchange and bylaw 2.10(e) were released by the settlement. A petition for rehearing was denied on March 1, 2005, as was a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Settlement funds are now being distributed to the class.

Plaintiffs in one action challenging interchange (Reyn’s Pasta Bella, filed in 2002) appealed the Northern District of California’s dismissal of its case based on the release in the Retailers’ settlement agreement. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard argument on December 7, 2005 and affirmed the district court’s dismissal on March 27, 2006.

In January 2006, the United States made a monetary claim against the settlement fund that was established in connection with the settlement of the Retailers’ Litigation in December 2003. The United States was not a class member, but asserted equitable arguments as a “merchant” on behalf of its agencies and instrumentalities accepting Visa or MasterCard cards. After the claims administrator denied the government’s claim, the government appealed the decision to the federal court that has retained jurisdiction to resolve disputes relating to administration of the Retailers’ settlement fund. On December 29, 2006, a settlement agreement was reached whereby Visa and MasterCard International Incorporated together will pay the U.S. government $3.5 million and the government’s claim against the Retailers’ settlement fund will be capped and reduced by 66 percent. Visa’s portion of the agreement is $2.0 million. The settlement also provides Visa with a full release from the U.S. government for all interchange and “Honor All Cards”-type claims accruing prior to January 1, 2004. The District Court entered an order approving the settlement on February 28, 2007.

Retailers’ “Opt-Outs”

Several merchants who “opted-out” of the Retailers’ class action asserted similar claims against Visa U.S.A. These cases were consolidated for pretrial proceedings (MDL 1575) before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Visa U.S.A. has settled all but one of these suits, and, as a result, recorded a

F-119

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

pre-tax charge of $19.8 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2005. Discovery has begun in the sole remaining “opt-out” matter (GMRI). In GMRI, the plaintiff contends that it can pursue a motion for partial summary judgment previously filed by the settling “opt-out” merchants. The motion has been briefed but no hearing has been scheduled.

Retailers’ “Conspiracy” Cases

In the summer of 2005, purported consumer class actions were filed against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Bennett) and Circuit City Stores, Inc. (Temple) in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. In these cases, the plaintiffs allege that Wal-Mart and Circuit City, respectively, engaged in tying, attempted monopolization, and other conduct in violation of the Tennessee Trade Practices Act and the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. They also assert various common law claims. Visa and MasterCard are not named as defendants in these actions, but are alleged to have conspired with Wal-Mart and Circuit City. Wal-Mart and Circuit City have sought to have the cases transferred to the Eastern District of New York. The magistrate has recommended that the cases be transferred, and the plaintiffs have filed objections to that recommendation.

“Indirect Purchaser” Actions

Forty so-called “indirect purchaser” actions stemming from the Retailers’ litigation have been filed against Visa and MasterCard in nineteen states and the District of Columbia. In these actions, the plaintiffs purport to represent classes of residents of one or more states who purchased goods at merchants that accepted Visa- or MasterCard-branded payment cards. They claim to have paid higher prices as a result of the purported “tying” and other alleged anti-competitive conduct at issue in the Retailers’ litigation. The plaintiffs assert claims under state antitrust statutes, state consumer protection statutes, and common law.

Cases in ten jurisdictions were dismissed by the trial court and the plaintiffs declined to pursue an appeal. The actions in New York, Tennessee, and Nebraska ended after the trial courts’ dismissals with prejudice were affirmed on appeal. The action in Iowa was dismissed by the trial court in a decision that is currently under appeal. Lawsuits in California and West Virginia have not been dismissed but may not proceed into discovery. Actions in the four other jurisdictions remain before trial courts pending resolution of existing or anticipated motions to dismiss.

In fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Company recorded charges related to the Retailers’ settlement and other merchant litigation matters of $79.6 million, $117.8 million, and $102.1 million, respectively, which are reflected in Litigation Provision and Interest Expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The primary component of fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 charges was accretion expense of $79.6 million, $98.0 million, and $99.5 million, respectively, recorded on the Retailers’ settlement and other merchant litigation matters, discounted at 7.25 percent over the payment terms. Relating to these matters, cash payments of $211 million, $268 million, and $205 million were made in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Settlement Service Fee Litigation

On September 23, 2003, MasterCard filed papers in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that Visa U.S.A.’s bylaw 3.14, the Settlement Service Fee (SSF), does not comply with the terms of the injunction issued in the DOJ Case. In December 2003, the court denied MasterCard’s motion on jurisdictional grounds. MasterCard re-filed its challenge to the SSF on January 10, 2005, seeking repeal of bylaw 3.14 and a court order giving certain Visa debit issuers the right to rescind all or part of Visa debit Partnership agreements entered into since the SSF was enacted. A court appointed Special Master conducted an evidentiary hearing in December 2005.

F-120

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

On July 7, 2006, the Special Master submitted confidential findings of fact and conclusions of law to the court. Visa and MasterCard have filed objections and alternative motions to adopt or modify the Report under seal in July and August 2006. The court may adopt, modify, or reject the Special Master’s recommendation, or resubmit the case to the Special Master for further proceedings. No timeframe for a ruling by the court has been set and any final order may be appealed.

Currency Conversion Litigation

State Litigation

In 2000, a “representative” action was filed in California state court against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in connection with Visa’s practice of charging its members a 1 percent “currency conversion fee” when a U.S. cardholder purchases goods or services in a foreign currency, and the disclosure of that fee (Schwartz). Plaintiffs claimed Visa’s currency conversion practices violated California Business & Professions Code Section 17200, and sought injunctive relief and restitution.

Four additional California state currency conversion class actions were filed against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International. Shrieve and Castro alleged that Visa had a duty to inform cardholders using debit cards overseas of the existence of the 1 percent currency conversion fee that Visa charges its members. Mattingly alleged Visa had a duty to inform cardholders using credit cards overseas of the existence of the 1 percent currency conversion fee. Baker challenged Visa International’s calculation of currency conversion rates and the disclosure of those rates. All plaintiffs sought restitution and injunctive relief.

Federal Multidistrict Litigation (MDL)

A federal MDL currency conversion lawsuit alleged, inter alia, price-fixing violations against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and a number of banks arising out of the 1 percent currency conversion fee Visa charges to members and the optional issuer fees that issuers may charge cardholders. In March 2005, the court held that plaintiffs with valid arbitration agreements cannot go forward in court and must proceed with arbitration instead. Those plaintiffs are appealing the ruling.

Federal Multidistrict Litigation & State Litigation

On July 20, 2006, the parties executed a settlement agreement to resolve all federal MDL and state claims, including those on appeal. Under the agreement, the defendants collectively will pay $336.0 million to create a settlement fund to pay monetary claims by eligible cardholders, the costs of administering the settlement and notice to cardholders, and any court-approved fees and expenses to attorneys for the class and awards to the class representatives. Visa’s portion of the settlement fund is $100.1 million. Visa and MasterCard will pay an additional $32.0 million to resolve the claims in the Schwartz matter; Visa’s share is $18.6 million. The settlement agreement also includes provisions relating to disclosures on billing statements and other documents. The settlement agreement has been preliminarily approved by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

First Data Litigation

In April 2002, Visa U.S.A. filed a complaint against First Data Corporation, First Data Resources, Inc., and First Data Merchant Services Corporation (collectively, First Data) in United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The action was based on First Data’s attempt to implement, without Visa’s prior approval, a “private arrangement” among Visa members by which First Data would authorize, clear, and settle Visa transactions, bypassing VisaNet. Visa asserted trademark and related contract claims and sought declaratory

F-121

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

relief, injunctive relief, and damages. First Data filed counterclaims in November 2002, alleging that Visa violated federal and state antitrust laws by banning private arrangements. First Data also asserted common law contract and tort claims and a claim under California state consumer protection law. In August 2004, First Data filed amended counterclaims, adding a “concerted refusal to deal” claim under federal antitrust laws and expanding the market definition to include “debit card network processing services.”

On July 5, 2006, the parties signed a confidential settlement agreement. Both parties’ claims were dismissed with prejudice on July 6, 2006.

Parke Litigation

On June 27, 2005, a purported merchant and consumer class action was filed in California state court against Visa International, Visa U.S.A., MasterCard, Merrick Bank, and CardSystems Solutions, Inc. (Parke). The complaint alleges that Visa’s failure to inform cardholders of a security breach at CardSystems Solutions, Inc. in a timely manner constitutes an unlawful and/or unfair business practice under California’s Unfair Competition Law and violates California privacy law. The court denied the plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order, except with respect to the defendants’ retention of affected account-identifying information, and for a preliminary injunction. In September 2005, the court dismissed the claims brought by the merchants, and on November 18, 2005, the defendants answered the remaining claims.

CardSystems Solutions, Inc. filed for bankruptcy in United States District Court for the District of Arizona in May 2006. The Parke plaintiffs removed the case to United States District Court for the Northern District of California on August 10, 2006 and then sought to transfer the case to federal court in Arizona. Visa and MasterCard moved for remand to state court. On October 11, 2006, the court granted the defendants’ motion for remand and denied the plaintiffs’ motion to transfer the case.

Debit Hold Litigation

On July 23, 2004, a purported class action was filed against Visa U.S.A. in United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, asserting claims of conversion, civil conspiracy, and negligence (Lemacks). The plaintiff alleged that Visa directed, allowed, or conspired with banks and restaurants to place holds on her account in an amount exceeding the purchase price of the meals. The plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages, disgorgement of profits allegedly realized, and an injunction prohibiting the practice. In December 2005, the parties executed a settlement agreement to resolve all claims, and the case was dismissed.

PSW Litigation

On August 17, 2004, PSW Inc.—a defunct company that processed credit card information for Internet merchants—sued Visa U.S.A., MasterCard, First Financial Bank, and First Data Merchant Services in United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island. Among other things, the complaint alleged that Visa and MasterCard exercised monopoly power to exclude competition unreasonably, resulting in higher prices for network services and excessive fines and penalties. In July 2006, the parties executed a settlement agreement to resolve all claims in this matter. The settlement was approved by the receivership court and the case was dismissed on September 19, 2006.

CLI Litigation

In June 2003, a lawsuit was filed in California state court against Visa and MasterCard challenging certain corporate risk policies related to chargebacks. As to Visa, the plaintiff claims that fines and fees assessed

F-122

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

pursuant to Visa’s programs monitoring acquirers whose merchants have excessive chargebacks violate California’s Unfair Competition Law. Purporting to act on behalf of all merchants that accept Visa- or MasterCard-branded cards, the plaintiff seeks restitution of the fees and injunctive relief.

In December 2005, the court vacated all deadlines pending disposition of the Proposition 64 cases before the California Supreme Court. After the Supreme Court found Proposition 64 applicable to pending cases, the trial court gave the plaintiff until November 6, 2006 to amend the complaint or have the action dismissed. On August 23, 2006, Visa filed a motion to dismiss based on Proposition 64. The plaintiff elected not to pursue the case further and in November 2006 the parties filed a stipulated judgment dismissing the case with prejudice.

Intellectual Property Litigation

In December 2003, Safeclick, LLC sued Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in United States District Court for the Northern District of California for patent infringement. Safeclick alleged that the “Verified by Visa” program (VbV), which authenticates the identity of a cardholder in an Internet transaction, infringes two claims of Safeclick’s “Electronic Transaction Security System” patent. Safeclick indicated that it would seek “reasonable royalty” damages and injunctive relief.

On December 14, 2005, the court granted Visa’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing the case in its entirety. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal on October 23, 2006. On November 2, 2006, the parties entered an agreement to allow this judgment to become final without seeking any further amendment or appeal.

On May 8, 2003, Starpay and VIMachine sued Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, claiming that Visa used information provided to it by Starpay in 2000 to create VbV and to file a Visa patent application on the technology underlying VbV. Two claims are asserted: infringement of VIMachine’s patent and misappropriation of Starpay’s trade secrets. In February 2006, each party filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation on claim construction. Once the court rules on those objections and finalizes the claim construction, a case schedule will be set for the remainder of discovery and trial.

In November 2003, Softcard Systems Inc. (Softcard) filed a complaint against Visa U.S.A. and Target Corporation (Target) in United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Softcard alleged that aspects of Visa and Target’s smart card loyalty programs for cardholders infringed Softcard patents related to electronic coupon programs. In December 2005, the case was dismissed pursuant to a settlement agreement that resolved all claims.

On January 30, 2007, Every Penny Counts, Inc. filed a lawsuit in federal court in the Middle District of Florida against Bank of America Corporation and Visa U.S.A. alleging patent infringement related to Bank of America’s “Keep the Change” program. On April 23, 2007, Every Penny Counts, Inc. voluntarily dismissed its claims against Visa U.S.A.

ATM Exchange Litigation

On November 14, 2005, ATM Exchange sued Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in United States District Court for the District of Ohio. The plaintiff asserts claims of promissory estoppel, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentation, alleging that Visa’s “deferment” of a deadline for meeting heightened ATM data encryption testing and approval standards harmed the plaintiff by reducing demand for its ATM upgrade solution. Discovery has begun and trial is scheduled for September 2007.

F-123

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

TCF Financial Corporation Litigation

On April 26, 2006, TCF Financial Corporation (TCF) filed an action in Delaware Chancery Court against Visa U.S.A. and its Board members, seeking to enjoin Visa’s annual meeting, Visa’s proposed restructuring, and the filing of an amended Certificate of Incorporation and amended bylaws. TCF also sought declaratory relief with respect to its breach of fiduciary duty claim, which is based on disclosures made in the proxy statement and corporate governance changes within the corporate restructuring. The parties reached a confidential agreement in November 2006 pursuant to which all claims will be dismissed with prejudice.

Lampone Litigation

On May 23, 2006, an action was filed against Visa U.S.A., U.S. Bancorp, eFunds, and Wildcard in California state court on behalf of a putative class of California consumers who were enrolled in the Visa Buxx service and were assessed an “overdraft” fee by U.S. Bancorp. Asserting claims under California Business & Professions Code Section 17200 and the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants failed to disclose that a Visa Buxx cardholder can overdraw the Visa Buxx card and that the cardholder could be assessed an overdraft fee. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, restitution, and disgorgement.

Harding Litigation

In May 2003, Retailers National Bank filed a collection action in California state court against a cardholder for credit card debts incurred as a result of her Internet gambling (Harding). In August 2003, the cardholder filed a cross-complaint against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, other payment card companies and several banks, alleging violations of California’s unfair competition statute; state and federal gambling laws; California’s public policy against the collection and enforcement of gambling debts; and the USA PATRIOT Act’s prohibition on transferring funds intended to be used to support unlawful activity. Only injunctive relief is sought against Visa U.S.A.

Visa has not yet answered the cross-complaint. In September 2006, the U.S. Congress passed legislation concerning Internet gambling that may affect the cross-complainant’s ability to seek injunctive relief.

District of Columbia Civil Investigative Demand

On January 5, 2007, the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia issued a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) to Visa U.S.A. Inc. seeking information regarding a potential violation of Section 28-4502 of the District of Columbia Antitrust Act. The D.C. Attorney General’s office is coordinating parallel investigations by the Attorneys General of New York and Ohio. The CID seeks documents and narrative responses to several interrogatories and document requests, which focus on PIN debit. Visa is negotiating the scope and timing of its response to the CID.

Note 19—Related Parties

The Company conducts business as a non-stock, non-assessable membership corporation. The principal members of Visa U.S.A. Inc. are approximately 1,700 financial institutions that participate directly in the Company’s payment programs. In addition, there are approximately 11,700 associate and participant members that participate in the Company’s payment programs through one or more principal members. As a membership corporation, the Company receives revenue from its members in the form of service fees, data processing fees, and other fees, which is then used to create and support products and services that can be offered by the Company’s members to cardholders and merchants.

F-124

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

The Company’s Board of Directors is represented by various member financial institutions who are also the Company’s customers, and by independent directors. The Company generated total operating revenues of approximately $808.1 million, $884.4 million, and $634.0 million from financial institutions and corporations represented on its Board of Directors in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The Company incurred costs of $11.0 million, $4.3 million, and $5.6 million for services provided by financial institutions and corporations represented on its Board of Directors in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. These services primarily related to software maintenance and investment custodial services. The Company owed approximately $0.9 million and $8.2 million to these parties, and they owed the Company $48.2 million and $65.5 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, the Company was in a net liability position of $4.3 million and a net asset position of $111.4 million as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, attributed to volume and support arrangements with these parties.

The Company has one customer who is also a member of the Board of Directors, that accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company’s net operating revenues in fiscal 2006 and 2005. Net operating revenues from this customer were $408.3 million, $344.5 million, and $219.1 million in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. No other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company’s net operating revenues in fiscal 2006, 2005 or 2004.

Members of the Board of Directors who are not employees are compensated for their services to the Company. Directors who are also Visa employees do not receive any additional compensation for serving as a director.

During 2006, retainers paid to the Board of Directors were changed. The Chair of the Board receives an annual retainer of $30,000; independent directors receive an annual retainer of $178,000; and all other directors receive an annual retainer of $18,000. Member director committee chairs also receive an additional $6,000 annual retainer. These retainers are paid quarterly. Directors also receive a meeting fee of $6,000 for each board meeting they attend and $2,000 for each telephonic board meeting and committee meeting they attend. Total director fees for eight meetings in 2006 were $1.0 million.

During 2005, retainers paid to the Board of Directors were as follows: The Chair of the Board received an annual retainer of $20,000 and all other directors received an annual retainer of $12,000. Directors also received a meeting fee of $2,000 for each board meeting they attended and $1,000 for each committee meeting they attended. Total director fees for seven meetings in 2005 were $0.5 million. Total director fees for 13 meetings in 2004 were $0.4 million.

Visa U.S.A. Inc. operates a proprietary network, VisaNet, that links issuers and acquirers for transaction processing services. Processing services are provided through Visa’s majority-owned subsidiary, Inovant LLC. The Company provides processing and development services and various license and usage rights to Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe, in accordance with service agreements with these entities. See Note 5 for additional information regarding transactions with these Visa entities.

Note 20—Subsequent Events

Proposed Restructuring

In October 2006, Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and Visa Canada announced their intention to restructure Visa in order to create a new public global corporation called Visa Inc. The restructuring and related activities are subject to approval by Visa members and regulatory authorities. It is anticipated that Visa Inc. will be created

F-125

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Year Ended September 30, 2006

through a series of mergers involving Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and Visa Canada. Visa Europe will remain a membership association, owned and governed by its European member banks, and become a licensee of Visa Inc. Visa Europe will have a minority ownership interest in Visa Inc., and Visa Inc. will have a minority investment interest in Visa Europe. The reorganization will result in a new stock corporation owned by former members of Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and Visa Canada. As a part of the restructuring, the board of Visa Inc. will be comprised of a majority of independent directors.

Appointment of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Visa Inc.

On February 12, 2007, Joseph W. Saunders was named the designated Executive Chairman of the board of Directors of Visa Inc. and, on May 15, 2007, the designated Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc. Before the formation of Visa Inc., Mr. Saunders began fulfilling the responsibilities of these positions as a designated appointee of Visa Inc. and officially assumed the title of Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer upon the formation of Visa Inc.

F-126

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS—Unaudited

	As of March 31,			As of September 30,
	2007			2006
	(in thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	386,042		$	270,124
Investment securities, available-for-sale		1,026,199			660,451
Accounts receivable		217,975			216,585
Settlement receivable		36,416			41,450
Current portion of volume and support agreements		90,536			110,751
Current portion of deferred tax asset		149,381			149,671
Prepaid and other current assets		134,055			144,899
Total current assets		2,040,604			1,593,931
Investment securities, available-for-sale		355,488			515,290
Volume and support agreements		41,202			43,071
Investment in Visa International		210,229			186,353
Facilities, equipment, and software, net		268,472			280,899
Deferred tax assets		237,533			237,533
Other assets		98,948			106,841
Total assets	$	3,252,476		$	2,963,918
Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	64,157		$	119,075
Settlement payable		84,717			88,767
Accrued compensation		145,638			179,557
Volume and support agreements		185,490			216,255
Current portion of member deposits		70,355			134,070
Accrued liabilities		448,401			406,815
Current portion of long-term debt		25,914			32,339
Current portion of accrued litigation		237,956			216,085
Total current liabilities		1,262,628			1,392,963
Member deposits		—			3,320
Other liabilities		139,175			122,083
Long-term debt		31,536			41,280
Accrued litigation		811,413			783,618
Total liabilities		2,244,752			2,343,264
Minority interest		39,266			37,840
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Equity
Accumulated net income		968,903			583,772
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(445	)		(958	)
Total equity		968,458			582,814
Total liabilities and equity	$	3,252,476		$	2,963,918

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-127

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS—Unaudited

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
	(in thousands)
Operating Revenues
Card service fees	$	811,382		$	737,740
Data processing fees		651,942			612,818
Volume and support agreements		(233,806	)		(278,614	)
International transaction fees		210,989			185,925
Other revenues		217,667			209,560
Total operating revenues		1,658,174			1,467,429
Operating Expenses
Personnel		344,749			329,476
Facilities		45,270			44,035
Network, EDP, and communications		160,957			160,362
Advertising, marketing, and promotion		249,866			260,146
Visa International fees		86,467			86,166
Professional and consulting fees		150,308			118,183
Administrative and other		25,557			71,507
Litigation provision		14,800			48,797
Total operating expenses		1,077,974			1,118,672
Operating income		580,200			348,757
Other Income (Expense)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		25,107			12,796
Interest expense		(39,798	)		(44,361	)
Investment income, net		45,838			26,759
Total other income (expense)		31,147			(4,806	)
Income before income taxes and minority interest		611,347			343,951
Income tax expense		225,032			125,373
Income before minority interest		386,315			218,578
Minority interest		(1,184	)		(5,760	)
Net income	$	385,131		$	212,818

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-128

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY—Unaudited

	Accumulated Net Income		Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income			Total Equity
	(in thousands)
Balance as of September 30, 2005	$	129,211	$	(3,590	)	$	125,621
Net income		212,818					212,818
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax				(47	)		(47	)
Comprehensive income							212,771
Balance as of March 31, 2006	$	342,029	$	(3,637	)	$	338,392
Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	583,772	$	(958	)	$	582,814
Net income		385,131					385,131
Other comprehensive income, net of tax				513			513
Comprehensive income							385,644
Balance as of March 31, 2007	$	968,903	$	(445	)	$	968,458

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME—Unaudited

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
	(in thousands)
Net Income	$	385,131		$	212,818
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Net unrealized gain on investment securities, available-for-sale		2,517			783
Income tax expense		(914	)		(262	)
Reclassification adjustment for net gain realized in net income		(1,712	)		(895	)
Income tax benefit		622			327
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		513			(47	)
Comprehensive Income	$	385,644		$	212,771

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-129

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—Unaudited

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
	(in thousands)
Operating Activities
Net income	$	385,131		$	212,818
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		57,068			62,196
Amortization		6,458			8,894
Net realized gain on investment securities		(1,712	)		(895	)
Loss on write-off of assets		1,010			—
Minority interest		1,184			5,760
Amortization of volume and support agreements		225,436			256,722
Accrued litigation and accretion		50,606			88,116
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates		(25,107	)		(12,796	)
Deferred income taxes		—			9,411
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,390	)		(1,119	)
Settlement receivable		5,034			5,785
Volume and support agreements		(234,117	)		(242,108	)
Other assets		20,971			47,616
Accounts payable		(54,921	)		(65,727	)
Settlement payable		(4,050	)		11,129
Accrued compensation		(33,919	)		(37,878	)
Accrued and other liabilities		60,147			55,046
Accrued litigation		(940	)		(10,605	)
Member deposits		(71,314	)		(71,314	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		385,575			321,051
Investing Activities
Investment securities, available-for-sale:
Purchases		(1,427,029	)		(1,566,482	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities		1,222,378			1,329,635
Contributions to joint ventures		(1,000	)		—
Purchases of facilities, equipment, and software		(45,651	)		(23,970	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(251,302	)		(260,817	)
Financing Activities
Principal payments on debt		(16,600	)		(16,600	)
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		(1,755	)		(1,668	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(18,355	)		(18,268	)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		115,918			41,966
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		270,124			135,397
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	386,042		$	177,363
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	177,444		$	123,622
Interest payments on debt	$	2,022		$	3,304
Decreases in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities related to purchases of facilities, equipment, software and intangible assets	$	(15,476	)	$	(9,888	)

See accompanying notes, which are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-130

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1—Organization

Visa U.S.A. Inc. (Visa, Visa U.S.A., or the Company) consists of Visa U.S.A. Inc. and its subsidiaries: Inovant, Inc., International Anasazi, Inc., Interlink Network, Inc., Integrated Solutions Concepts, Inc., Debit Processing Services, Inc., Plus System, Inc., Inovant LLC and Advanced Resolution Services, Inc.

In June 2006, the Company dissolved its wholly-owned subsidiary, Merchant Processing Holdings, Inc. (MPH). MPH held the Company’s joint venture interest in Vital Processing Services L.L.C., which was sold in March 2005.

The Company has one operating and reportable segment, “Payment Services” in the United States. The Company’s activities are interrelated, and each activity is dependent upon and supportive of the other. Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based on analysis of Visa U.S.A. as one operating and reporting segment.

Visa is a non-stock, non-assessable, Delaware corporation. The Company operates a payment system that enables consumers and businesses to conduct financial transactions using Visa-branded payment products at physical and virtual points-of-sale and at automated teller machines which are identified by the Visa Brand Mark, Visa Point-of-Sale Graphic or familiar three-band Visa Flag, and other various designs and marks in the United States.

Visa’s products and services enable its members to participate in an international payment system that none could offer individually. Visa U.S.A. does not issue cards, set fees, or determine the interest rates consumers will be charged on Visa-branded cards. Visa U.S.A.’s issuing members have the independent responsibility individually to determine these and most other competitive card features. These functions are performed by Visa member financial institutions in competition with one another. Visa U.S.A. establishes standards and procedures for acceptance and settlement of member transactions. Visa’s services allow merchants and consumers to use efficient, secure, and guaranteed payment products in lieu of cash, checks, and other forms of payment. Its relationship is with the cardholder’s issuing and merchant’s acquiring member financial institutions.

Membership is composed of financial institutions participating in this system. At its April 2006 Annual Meeting, the Company adopted an amended Certificate of Incorporation and amended bylaws which changed the composition of the Board of Directors and clarified dividend, dissolution, membership interest, and voting rights. In accordance with the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws, members pay service fees each quarter based on payments volume for the preceding quarter. Payments volume is defined as total monetary value of transactions for goods and services purchased, initiated with Visa products, including PIN-based debit, and excluding cash transactions. Members’ dividend and dissolution rights, membership interests in the corporation, and voting rights are based on the members’ respective cumulative portions of the total of all of certain fees paid to the Company up to the most recent Reference Date as defined in the amended Certificate of Incorporation. The initial Reference Date is May 1, 2006 and members’ proportions will be adjusted as of each third anniversary of that date. The Board of Directors includes independent Directors who meet eligibility requirements set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation, including the definition of independence from the Company and its members. The chief executive officers of the Company and of Visa International Service Association (Visa International) serve as ex officio non-voting directors. Directors other than ex officio directors are elected in at-large voting by members in accordance with voting rights and director qualifications set forth in the Company’s bylaws. Under the amended Certificate of Incorporation, the directors will serve staggered terms of two years. Members represented on the Board of Directors accounted for 38 percent of total card payments volume for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Visa members, which are comprised of domestic banks and other financial institutions, represent 100 percent of the Company’s payments volume.

F-131

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As described in Note 20 to the Company’s 2006 audited financial statements, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan in October 2006 to form Visa Inc. by a series of mergers involving Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada Association (Visa Canada), and Visa International.

In February 2007, Visa International hired Joseph W. Saunders as the Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Visa Inc. and, on May 15, 2007, the designated Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Visa Inc. Before the formation of Visa Inc., Mr. Saunders will begin fulfilling the responsibilities of this position as a designated appointee of Visa Inc. and will officially assume the title of Executive Chairman of the Board upon the proposed formation of Visa Inc.

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements as of the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are unaudited and are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been omitted, and accordingly these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2006.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the results for the interim periods presented.

Revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities can vary during each quarter of the year. Therefore, the results and trends in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements may not be indicative of results for any other interim period or for the entire year.

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Visa and its subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. The Company consolidates entities when it has a greater than 50 percent ownership or when it exercises control. Minority interest is recorded for consolidated entities in which the Company has less than 100 percent ownership interest. Minority Interest represents the equity interest not owned by the Company.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications, not affecting net income, have been made to prior period information to conform to the current period presentation format.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates include certain revenue discounts and volume-based support incentives, assumptions used in the determination of pension and postretirement costs, discount rates used to present value of long-term obligations, and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, among others.

F-132

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Advertising Costs

In accordance with SOP 93-7, “Reporting on Advertising Costs,” the Company expenses the production costs of advertising as incurred. The cost of media advertising is expensed when the advertising takes place. Total advertising costs, included in Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, were $144.4 million and $178.1million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Operating Leases

The Company evaluates the impact of rent escalation clauses and lease incentives, including rent abatements and tenant improvement allowances included in its operating leases. Rent escalation clauses and lease incentives are considered in determining total rent expense to be recognized during the term of the lease, which begins on the date the Company takes control of the leased space. Renewal options are considered by evaluating the overall term of the lease.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Staff Positions Nos. 115-1 and 124-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (FSP SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1). FSP SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1 address the determination of when an investment is considered impaired and whether impairment is temporary. These pronouncements provide a three-step process for determining and accounting for other-than-temporary impairment, as well as disclosure requirements for reporting unrealized losses. FSP SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1 are effective for the first reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted FSP SFAS 115 and SFAS 124-1 on October 1, 2005. Additional disclosures required under the pronouncements are included in Note 5. The adoption of FSP SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1 did not have an impact to the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Note 3—Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe

Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe Limited (Visa Europe) are all separately incorporated entities. The Company pays expenses to Visa International and earns revenues from Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe.

A summary of the major expenses paid to Visa International is as follows:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007		2006
	(in thousands)
Visa International Fees	$	86,467	$	86,166
Network and EDP Services		1,401		1,253
Total	$	87,868	$	87,419

Visa U.S.A. operates a proprietary network, VisaNet that links issuers and acquirers for transaction processing services. Processing services are provided through the Company’s majority-owned subsidiary, Inovant LLC. The Company provides processing and development services and various license and usage rights to Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe, in accordance with service agreements with these entities.

F-133

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

A summary of Data Processing Fees and Other Revenues received from Visa International, Visa Canada, and Visa Europe is as follows:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007		2006
	(in thousands)
Visa International	$	95,880	$	96,736
Visa Canada		9,882		9,081
Visa Europe		30,381		32,075
Total	$	136,143	$	137,892

The net balances for related party services due to the Company, presented below, are recorded in Accounts Receivable and Prepaid and Other Current Assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

	March 31,		September 30,
	2007		2006
	(in thousands)
Visa International	$	22,110	$	30,969
Visa Canada	$	1,541	$	1,718
Visa Europe	$	4,832	$	4,985

As of March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, the Company also had receivables of $20.0 million from Visa International related to income taxes. This balance is included in Other Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company has an uncommitted credit facility with Visa International whereby the Company or Visa International may provide each other short-term financing with a maximum term of five business days. Neither the Company nor Visa International has the obligation to lend to or to borrow from the other company. There were no outstanding balances as of March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 under this arrangement.

Note 4—Prepaid and Other Current Assets

Prepaid and Other Current Assets is comprised of the following:

	March 31,		September 30,
	2007		2006
	(in thousands)
Member Collateral	$	49,361	$	51,042
Prepaid Maintenance		30,668		18,042
Prepaid Customer Support		21,845		23,593
Interest receivable		15,570		14,131
Prepaid Other		6,345		7,482
Restricted Time Deposits		6,231		4,805
Non-trade receivables		1,456		14,282
Income Taxes Receivable		565		5,567
Prepaid Pension		—		4,081
Other		2,014		1,874
Total	$	134,055	$	144,899

F-134

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Note 5—Investments

Available-for-sale investment securities, which are recorded at fair value, consist of marketable debt securities issued by government-sponsored entities, tax-exempt municipal bonds, auction rate securities, and mutual fund investments in equity securities. The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale securities are as follows:

	As of March 31, 2007
	Available-For-Sale
	Amortized Cost		Gross Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Government-Sponsored Entities	$	1,180,484	$	105	$	1,463	$	1,179,126
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds		31,151		10		104		31,057
Auction Rate Securities		116,450		—		—		116,450
Equity Securities		52,249		3,282		477		55,054
Total	$	1,380,334	$	3,397	$	2,044	$	1,381,687
	As of September 30, 2006
	(in thousands)
Government Sponsored Entities	$	897,648	$	170	$	2,519	$	895,299
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds		248,799		570		402		248,967
Equity Securities		29,906		2,125		556		31,475
Total	$	1,176,353	$	2,865	$	3,477	$	1,175,741

The contractual maturity of available-for-sale debt securities regardless of their balance sheet classification is as follows:

	As of March 31, 2007
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due within one year	$	972,245	$	971,145
Due in one to five years		239,390		239,038
Total	$	1,211,635	$	1,210,183

Investments with a fair market value less than cost at March 31, 2007 are as follows:

	12 Months or Less				Greater Than 12 Months				Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
	(in thousands)
Government-Sponsored Entities	$	581,774	$	766	$	236,983	$	697	$	818,757	$	1,463
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds		5,548		3		18,040		101		23,588		104
Equity Securities		3,180		7		3,936		470		7,116		477
Total	$	590,502	$	776	$	258,959	$	1,268	$	849,461	$	2,044

F-135

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The unrealized losses on investments in government-sponsored entities and tax-exempt municipal bonds are caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the par value of the initial issuance of the securities. As of March 31, 2007, a total of 84 investments in government-sponsored entities and tax-exempt municipal bonds are in an unrealized loss position. Because management has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be to maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2007.

Equity securities primarily consist of mutual fund investments related to various employee compensation plans. For these plans, employees bear the risk of market fluctuations. Losses experienced on these equity investments are offset by reductions in personnel expense. Unrealized losses on equity securities were caused by changes in market conditions. As of March 31, 2007, a total of 5 fund investments are in an unrealized loss position. The Company has not identified any events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of investments in equity securities. Based on an evaluation of the near-term prospects of these investments and management’s ability and intent to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2007.

Note 6—Accrued Liabilities

Accrued Liabilities is comprised of the following:

	March 31,		September 30,
	2007		2006
	(in thousands)
Restricted Issuer Liability	$	151,570	$	100,414
Accrued Operating Expenses		135,193		154,096
Accrued Taxes		51,363		9,576
Member Collateral		49,361		51,042
Deferred Revenues		45,673		50,780
Accrued Discounts		7,303		36,105
Accrued Other		7,938		4,802
Total	$	448,401	$	406,815

Note 7—Pension, Postretirement, and Other Benefits

The Company participates in noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans, which provide for retirement benefits for Visa U.S.A. and Visa International employees residing in the United States. The following tables indicate the combined periodic pension costs for pensions and postretirement benefits for Visa U.S.A. and Visa International, along with the portion attributable to Visa U.S.A.

F-136

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Net periodic pension cost for the combined pension plans are as follows:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
	(in thousands)
Service cost	$	31,222		$	37,013
Interest cost		21,670			20,582
Expected return on assets		(18,282	)		(18,067	)
Amortization of:
Prior Service Costs		506			506
Actuarial Loss		4,226			8,659
Settlement Loss		—			2,803
Net Periodic Pension Cost	$	39,342		$	51,496
Visa U.S.A. Share of Net Periodic Pension Cost	$	31,134		$	39,341

Net periodic pension cost for the combined postretirement plans are as follows:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007			2006
	(in thousands)
Service cost	$	2,790		$	3,378
Interest cost		2,398			1,811
Expected return on assets		—			—
Amortization of:
Prior Service Costs		(2,330	)		(2,329	)
Actuarial Loss		1,088			902
Net Periodic Pension Cost	$	3,946		$	3,762
Visa U.S.A. Share of Net Periodic Pension Cost	$	3,240		$	3,078

Actual contributions made by the Company during the six months ended March 31, 2007 and the expected contributions for 2007 under its pension and postretirement plans are as follows:

Net settlement losses on plan assets included in Personnel expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations are as follows:

	Pension Plan				Postretirement Plan
	Total Contributions		Visa U.S.A.’s Portion		Total Contributions		Visa U.S.A.’s Portion
	(in thousands)
Actual employer contributions
Six months ended March 31, 2007	$	435	$	275	$	1,864	$	1,306
Expected employer contributions
2007	$	51,000	$	40,300	$	3,700	$	2,600

F-137

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007		2006
	(in thousands)
Plan Payments:
Total Excess Pension Plan Payments	$	—	$	4,245
Visa U.S.A. Portion of Excess Pension Plan Payments	$	—	$	3,268
Settlement Loss:
Total Net Settlement Loss	$	—	$	2,803
Visa U.S.A. Portion of Net Settlement Loss	$	—	$	1,626

Note 8—Workforce Reduction

In an effort to manage personnel and contract staffing levels in alignment with seasonality and project demand, the Company initiated a formal Flexible Resource Management plan in November 2006 to outsource certain data processing and development support functions. The plan is expected to reduce the Company’s workforce by approximately 200 employees, which represents approximately 6 percent of the Company’s total workforce as of March 31, 2007. Costs associated with this workforce reduction plan are related to termination benefits and retention bonuses. As of March 31, 2007 costs associated with this plan are estimated to be $14.5 million and are projected to be incurred throughout 2007 and 2008.

Most terminations are expected to be completed by the fourth fiscal quarter of 2007 while retention bonuses will continue to be paid through the third fiscal quarter of 2008 for employees who have been requested to render services until that time.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” the Company incurred charges of $9.8 million during the six months ended March 31, 2007.

These costs are estimated based on the Company’s workforce reduction plan as of the balance sheet date and are subject to adjustment. The Company continually evaluates the adequacy of the remaining liabilities under its workforce reduction plan. Although the Company believes that these estimates accurately reflect the costs of its plan, actual results may differ, thereby requiring the Company to record additional provisions or reverse a portion of such provisions.

Activity related to the workforce reduction is included in Personnel expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and in Accrued Compensation on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:

	(in thousands)
Beginning Balance, October 1, 2006	$	—
Workforce reduction charges		9,762
Cash payments		(2,212	)
Ending Balance, March 31, 2007	$	7,550

F-138

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Note 9—Concentration of Business Risks

During the six months ended March 31, 2007, two customers accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company’s net operating revenues. Net operating revenues from these customers were as follows:

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2007		2006
	(in thousands)
Customer A	$	254,060	$	216,548
Customer B		169,378		128,661

In 2006, only one of the customers above accounted for over 10 percent or more of the Company’s net operating revenues.

Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies

Volume and Support Agreements

The Company has agreements with members and merchants for various programs designed to build sales volume and increase payment product acceptance. These agreements, which range in term from one to thirteen years, provide card issuance, marketing, and program support based on specific performance requirements. These agreements are designed to encourage member loyalty and to increase overall Visa-branded payment volume, thereby reducing unit transaction processing costs and increasing brand awareness for all Visa members.

The Company is currently a party to other long-term contractual sponsorship arrangements ranging from two to eight years. These contracts are designed to help the Company increase Visa-branded cards and volumes. Over the life of these contracts, the Company is required to make payments in exchange for certain advertising and promotional rights.

Payments made and obligations incurred under these programs are included in Volume and Support Agreements and Accrued Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s obligation under member and merchant agreements is amortized as a reduction to revenue over the period of benefit and recorded in Volume and Support Agreements on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amortization for sponsorship agreements is recorded in Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Restricted Liabilities—Program Retirement

In April 2005, the Company introduced a program that supported card product usage for selected utilities that met certain acceptance standards. The program was funded by debit issuers at the time of settlement, to support efforts on their behalf to secure utility merchant acceptance and promote debit products usage. Under current program rules, unused funds, if any, were required to be returned to debit issuers at the conclusion of the program. The balance for this program was $3.6 million at March 31, 2007 and $2.3 million at September 30, 2006.

In January 2004, the Company introduced a program that supported Visa Check card usage and other business arrangements for selected merchants that met certain acceptance standards. The program was funded by Visa Check card issuers at the time of settlement, to support efforts on their behalf to secure merchant acceptance and promote card usage. Under current program rules, unused funds, if any, were required to be returned to Visa

F-139

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Check card issuers at the conclusion of the program. The balance for this program was $125.5 million at March 31, 2007 and $74.5 million at September 30, 2006. These funds are included in Cash and Cash Equivalents, Investment Securities, and Accrued Liabilities on the Company’s Balance sheets.

In April 2007, the Company retired both of these programs. Under current program rules, remaining unused funds from these programs will be returned to issuers by September 30, 2007. The Volume and Support Agreements table below has been updated to include future commitments under agreements sponsored by these retired programs.

The expected reduction of future revenues resulting from Volume and Support Agreements, including acceptance agreements sponsored by the retired programs described above, is estimated as follows:

For the Years Ending September 30	Volume and Support Agreements
	Member1		Other		Total
	(in thousands)
Remainder of 2007	$	204,914	$	76,427	$	281,341
2008		413,939		284,623		698,562
2009		399,951		243,100		643,051
2010		343,465		219,122		562,587
2011		262,705		220,261		482,966
Thereafter		204,101		469,283		673,384
Total Volume and Support Agreements	$	1,829,075	$	1,512,816	$	3,341,891

¹ Members represented on the Board of Directors account for $647 million of the total expected contract value.

Holographic Magnetic Card Reimbursement

In January 2006, the Company introduced a new card design with holographic magnetic stripe technology as part of its global brand architecture initiative. Limited technical problems were noted with regard to the use of the card and therefore the Company advised its members to discontinue its manufacture and distribution. The Company is a committed partner to its members and has established a reimbursement process for members and card vendors that have incurred production and issuance costs. As of March 31, 2007, the Company has an accrual of $10.5 million in Accrued Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This obligation is an estimate of the remaining amount required to reimburse the Company’s members for certain costs they have incurred with regard to the manufacture and distribution of the holographic magnetic card design. Members had until December 31, 2006 to file their claims. This amount may be adjusted as required when the Company completes its review of the claims it has received. As of March 31, 2007, $17.3 million in claims were filed by members and $6.8 million of claims have been paid.

Contingent Gain

On June 30, 2005, the Company exercised warrants to purchase 625,000 shares in WildCard Systems, Inc. (WildCard). Visa’s shares represented approximately 3 percent of shares outstanding. In July 2005, the Company sold its shares to eFunds Corporation (eFunds) as part of eFunds’ cash acquisition of WildCard. The sale resulted in no gain to the Company. However, as provided for in the acquisition, an “earn out” of up to $59.0 million could be paid if the acquired business achieved certain revenue targets in calendar year 2006. Visa’s share in this contingent “earn out” was estimated to be a maximum of $1.9 million. There was no guarantee that these revenue targets would be met, and as such, the gain contingency was not reflected in the Company’s financial statements. In April 2007, the Company concluded that there would be no earn out realized.

F-140

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Visa Extras

Visa Extras is a points-based rewards program administered by Visa U.S.A. and offered by members to their enrolled cardholders enabling cardholders to earn reward points on qualifying purchases. The Company administers the program for participating members and contracts with a vendor to perform the rewards fulfillment and other functions. During the transition of fulfillment services to a new vendor in fiscal 2007, conversion issues arose which resulted in limited accessibility to the Visa Extras platform for participating members and cardholders over a one month period. During the six months ended March 31, 2006, the Company recorded a charge of $4.6 million to remunerate impacted members for certain costs. These amounts were recorded as reductions to Other Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and in Accrued Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company believes that these amounts accurately reflect the Company’s exposure for such expenses as of the balance sheet date, but will continually monitor the adequacy of the liability.

Note 11—Legal Matters

The Company’s Litigation Provision includes provisions of $14.8 million and $48.8 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The litigation accrual is an estimate and is based on management’s understanding of its litigation profile, the specifics of each case, advice of counsel to the extent appropriate, and management’s best estimate of incurred loss as of the balance sheet dates. The Company will continue to review the litigation accrual and, if necessary, future refinements to the accrual will be made.

The following table summarizes the activity related to the litigation during the period ended March 31, 2007:

	(in thousands)
Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	999,703
Provision for legal matters		14,800
Interest accretion on settled matters		35,806
Payments on settled matters		(940	)
Balance as of March 31, 2007	$	1,049,369

The Company is presently involved in the matters described below and those described in Note 18 to the Company’s 2006 audited financial statements.

Rule 2.10(e) Litigation

American Express/Discover

At a hearing on April 25, 2007, the District Court for the Southern District of New York set a trial date of September 9, 2008 for both the American Express and Discover cases. The court also established deadlines and procedures for motions practice and expert discovery.

On June 7, 2007, Discover filed a Second Amendment Complaint, which eliminated allegations related to the “Honor All Cards” rule, dropped attempted monopolization and monopolization claims against MasterCard and Visa International to conform to the court’s rulings on motions to dismiss, and made technical change to names of the plaintiffs.

F-141

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Interchange Litigation

Kendall

The Ninth Circuit heard oral argument on the plaintiffs’ appeal on June 11, 2007. No ruling has been issued.

Retailers’ Litigation

U.S. Government Litigation

In January 2006, the United States made a monetary claim against the settlement fund that was established in connection with the settlement of the Retailers’ Litigation in December 2003. The United States was not a class member, but asserted equitable arguments as a “merchant” on behalf of its agencies and instrumentalities accepting Visa or MasterCard cards. After the claims administrator denied the government’s claim, the government appealed the decision to the federal court that has retained jurisdiction to resolve disputes relating to administration of the Retailers’ settlement fund. On December 29, 2006, a settlement agreement was reached whereby Visa and MasterCard International Incorporated together will pay the U.S. government $3.5 million and the government’s claim against the Retailers’ settlement fund will be capped and reduced by 66 percent. Visa’s portion of the agreement is $2.0 million. The settlement also provides Visa with a full release from the U.S. government for all interchange and “honor all cards”-type claims accruing prior to January 1, 2004. The District Court entered an order approving the settlement on February 28, 2007.

Retailers’ “Opt-Outs”

On May 14, 2007, GMRI, Inc. sought to amend its complaint and consolidate the case with Multidistrict Litigation 1720. Visa U.S.A., Visa International, and several of their member banks named as defendants in Multidistrict Litigation 1720 opposed the plaintiff’s motion. On June 1, 2007, the plaintiff withdrew its request.

“Indirect Purchaser” Actions

In the California cases, consolidated before the Superior Court for the State of California in the City and County of San Francisco, Visa filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings based upon California Proposition 64, which limits a plaintiff’s standing to bring claims under Section 17200. After oral argument, the court denied Visa’s motion on March 6, 2007. On June 7, 2007, the California Court of Appeal rejected a petition seeking immediate review of that decision.

In West Virginia, the action was brought against Visa U.S.A. by West Virginia’s attorney general as parens patriae for West Virginia consumers. The court denied Visa U.S.A.’s motion for summary judgment. Visa U.S.A. answered the West Virginia complaint on February 14, 2006 and the parties began discovery. On April 10, 2007, the court issued a stay of discovery pending its ruling on an antitrust standing issue. On April 27, 2007, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle all claims against Visa U.S.A. In connection with this agreement, the Company recorded a provision for the settlement.

Other Litigation

Settlement Service Fee (SSF) Litigation

The court held a hearing on April 23, 2007 and considered MasterCard’s request for an order repealing the SSF and giving certain issuers an opportunity to terminate their agreements early.

On June 7, 2007, the court issued an Opinion and Order holding that the Settlement Service Fee violated the final judgment in the Department of Justice litigation as of October 15, 2004. On June 15, 2007, the court issued

F-142

VISA U.S.A. INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

an Amended Opinion and Order, clarifying the remedy in the ruling. First, the court ordered Visa U.S.A. to repeal the Settlement Service Fee bylaw. Second, the court gave any Visa U.S.A. debit issuer subject to the Settlement Service Fee prior to its repeal who entered into an agreement that includes offline debit issuance with Visa on or after June 20, 2003 the right to terminate its agreement, provided that the issuer has entered into an agreement to issue MasterCard branded debit cards and the issuer repays to Visa U.S.A. any unearned benefits or financial incentives under its Visa U.S.A. agreement. Visa U.S.A. is analyzing the ruling and assessing its next steps, including the possibility of appeal.

On June 13, 2007, the parties entered into an agreement to toll the statute of limitations on certain potential claims MasterCard may have against Visa U.S.A. in connection with the Settlement Service Fee.

District of Columbia Civil Investigative Demand

On January 5, 2007, the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia issued a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) to Visa U.S.A. Inc. seeking information regarding a potential violation of Section 28-4502 of the District of Columbia Antitrust Act. The D.C. Attorney General’s office is coordinating parallel investigations by the Attorneys General of New York and Ohio. The CID seeks documents and narrative responses to several interrogatories and document requests, which focus on PIN debit. Visa continues to cooperate with the Attorneys General in connection with the CID.

The ATM Exchange Litigation

The parties have engaged in written discovery, party and third-party depositions, and expert discovery. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International anticipate filing dispositive motions in the case by June 29, 2007. Trial is tentatively scheduled for September 2007.

Harding Litigation

The parties are currently engaged in settlement negotiations. The potential settlement amount is not considered material to the Company’s financial statements.

Lampone Litigation

On May 4, 2007, the parties executed a confidential agreement to settle the case and dispose of all claims. The court will review the agreement before dismissing the class claims. The settlement amount is not considered material to the Company’s financial statements.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Every Penny Counts, Inc.

On January 30, 2007, Every Penny Counts, Inc. filed a lawsuit in federal court in the Middle District of Florida against Bank of America Corporation and Visa U.S.A. alleging patent infringement related to Bank of America’s “Keep the Change” program. Bank of America has agreed to indemnify Visa U.S.A. in this litigation and has taken over the defense of the lawsuit. On April 23, 2007, Every Penny Counts, Inc. voluntarily dismissed its claims against Visa U.S.A.

Note 12—Subsequent Event

Global Restructuring Agreement

On June 15, 2007, the boards of directors of Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Visa Europe approved the Global Restructuring Agreement that contemplates a series of transactions by which Visa International, Visa U.S.A., Visa Canada and Inovant will become subsidiaries of Visa Inc. The Global Restructuring Agreement contemplates that Visa Europe will not become a subsidiary of Visa Inc. and will become a stockholder of Visa Inc. and will enter into a series of contractual relationships that will govern its relationship with Visa Inc.

F-143

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Visa Canada Association

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of Visa Canada Association as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Association’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Visa Canada Association as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2006 in conformity with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

Canadian generally accepted accounting principles vary in certain significant respects from United States generally accepted accounting principles. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

Toronto, Canada

June 8, 2007

F-144

VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

(In thousands of Canadian dollars)

September 30, 2006 and 2005	2006			2005
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	7,336		$	6,881
Liquid investments (market value—$6,634; 2005—$6,952)		6,619			6,880
Accounts receivable (note 6)		5,231			4,051
Prepaid expenses		845			1,612
Income taxes recoverable		88			1,191
		20,119			20,615
Investment (note 3)		1,184			1,184
Property and equipment, net (note 2)		4,210			3,318
	$	25,513		$	25,117
Liabilities and Net Assets
Current liabilities:
Accrued and other liabilities (notes 6 and 7)	$	13,168		$	10,929
Deferred revenue		929			1,040
Current portion of obligation under capital lease (note 5)		30			—
		14,127			11,969
Accrued benefit liability (note 4)		1,646			2,026
Obligation under capital lease (note 5)		41			—
Net assets:
Invested in property and equipment, net		4,210			3,318
Internally restricted for Risk Stabilization Fund (note 8)		7,000			7,000
Unrestricted		(1,511	)		804
		9,699			11,122
Commitments (note 9)
	$	25,513		$	25,117

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-145

VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands of Canadian dollars)

Years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004	2006			2005		2004
Revenue from members (note 6)	$	113,618		$	107,279	$	100,670
Other revenue:
Card recovery bulletin fees		6,963			7,912		7,661
Interest		648			540		477
Distribution from Inovant LLC		—			3,125		1,384
Other		737			1,696		802
		8,348			13,273		10,324
Operating expenses:
Advertising and marketing		52,161			45,535		38,831
Direct expenses (note 6)		39,168			42,495		47,405
Other operating		30,304			28,948		21,003
		121,633			116,978		107,239
Provision for current income taxes		1,756			811		1,838
Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenses	$	(1,423	)	$	2,763	$	1,917

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-146

VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

(In thousands of Canadian dollars)

Years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004	Invested in property and equipment									Internally restricted for Risk Stabilization Fund (note 8)						Unrestricted									Total
	2006			2005			2004			2006		2005		2004		2006			2005			2004			2006			2005		2004
Net assets, beginning of year	$	3,318		$	1,923		$	1,982		$	7,000	$	7,000	$	7,000	$	804		$	(564	)	$	(2,540	)	$	11,122		$	8,359	$	6,442
Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenses		(975	)		(994	)		(1,017	)		—		—		—		(448	)		3,757			2,934			(1,423	)		2,763		1,917
Net change in investment in property and equipment		1,867			2,389			958			—		—		—		(1,867	)		(2,389	)		(958	)		—			—		—
Net assets, end of year	$	4,210		$	3,318		$	1,923		$	7,000	$	7,000	$	7,000	$	(1,511	)	$	804		$	(564	)	$	9,699		$	11,122	$	8,359

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-147

VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands of Canadian dollars)

Years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004	2006			2005			2004
Cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities:
Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenses	$	(1,423	)	$	2,763		$	1,917
Items not involving cash:
Amortization		975			994			1,017
Gain on sale of investments		(6	)		—			(55	)
Amortization of bond discount		(289	)		(306	)		(313	)
Write-down of liquid investments		57			—			—
Amortization of lease inducement		(111	)		236			331
Change in non-cash operating working capital:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable		(1,180	)		(954	)		798
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses		767			(1,096	)		390
Decrease (increase) in income taxes recoverable		1,103			(35	)		(640	)
Increase in accrued and other liabilities		2,239			697			1,313
Increase (decrease) in accrued benefit liability		(380	)		277			38
		1,752			2,576			4,796
Investing activities:
Property and equipment acquired		(1,796	)		(2,389	)		(1,012	)
Proceeds from sale/maturities of investments		3,428			1,408			2,512
Purchase of investments		(2,929	)		(1,409	)		(958	)
		(1,297	)		(2,390	)		542
Increase in cash		455			186			5,338
Cash, beginning of year		6,881			6,695			1,357
Cash, end of year	$	7,336		$	6,881		$	6,695

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-148

VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of Canadian dollars)

Visa Canada Association (the “Association”) is a corporation without share capital whose members are Canadian financial institutions. It was incorporated under the laws of Ontario on September 22, 1989 and commenced active operations effective November 1, 1989. The Association is a not-for-profit organization exempt from income taxes under Section 149(1)(l) of the Income Tax Act (Canada), provided certain requirements are met.

The Association administers a payment system, including various card products and travellers’ cheques, which are identified by the various Visa brand marks. The Association does not itself issue cards or acquire transactions for payments to merchants. These functions are performed by Visa member financial institutions in competition with one another. In turn, Visa International, of which the Association is a group member, provides certain payment system services to the Association. Members’ voting rights are based on volume; however, no dividend or distribution rights accrue to the members.

Certain of Visa Canada’s Member financial institutions have representation on Visa Canada’s Board of Directors.

In October 2006, Visa Canada Association, Visa International and other separately incorporated regional group members (together, “Visa”) announced the intention to restructure Visa in order to create a new global corporation called Visa Inc. The restructuring and related activities are subject to approval by Visa members and review by regulatory authorities. It is anticipated that Visa Inc. will be created through a series of mergers involving Visa Canada Association, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International. Visa Europe will remain a membership association, owned and governed by its European member banks, and become a licensee of Visa Inc. Visa Europe will have a minority ownership interest in Visa Inc. The reorganization will result in a new stock corporation owned by former members of Visa International, Visa U.S.A. and Visa Canada. As a part of the restructuring, the board of Visa Inc. will be comprised of a majority of independent directors.

1. Significant accounting policies:

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for not-for-profit organizations. The significant accounting policies are as follows:

(a) Basis of presentation:

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Association’s wholly owned subsidiary, VCA Inovant Investments Inc. ("VCAIII"). The subsidiary is incorporated in the United States under the General Corporation Law of Delaware, to hold its interest in Inovant LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

VCAIII is a taxable entity in the United States and the tax amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements relate to United States corporate income taxes paid by VCAIII.

(b) Revenue recognition:

Revenue from fees charged to members (i.e., service fees, data processing fees and card recovery bulletin fees) is recognized when the services are provided to members.

(c) Liquid investments:

Liquid investments comprise Government of Canada and provincial government securities, which are carried at the lower of cost and market and earn interest in the range of 3.19% to 5.18% per annum (2005 -3.19% to 6.07% per annum).

F-149

VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands of Canadian dollars)

(d) Income taxes:

The Association’s wholly owned subsidiary, VCAIII, uses the asset and liability method of accounting for incomes taxes. Under the asset and liability method, future tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the year that includes the date of enactment or substantive enactment. Valuation allowances are recorded when the conditions for recording a future tax asset are not met.

(e) Property and equipment:

Furniture and fixtures, computer equipment, office equipment, and software are recorded at historical cost and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from 36 to 60 months. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to expense.

Property under capital leases is initially recorded at the present value of minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease.

(f) Investment:

The investment has been accounted for using the cost method of accounting, whereby it has been initially recorded at cost. Any earnings from the investment are recognized only to the extent received or receivable.

(g) Employee future benefits:

The Association has defined benefit pension plans, for which the benefits are based on years of service and employees’ compensation. The cost of this program is being funded currently.

The Association accrues its obligations under employee benefit plans as the employees render the services necessary to earn the employee future benefits. The Association has adopted the following policies:

(i) The cost of retirement benefits earned by employees is actuarially determined using the projected benefit method prorated on service and management’s best estimate of expected plan investment performance, salary escalation and retirement ages.

(ii) For the purpose of calculating expected return on plan assets, those assets are valued at fair value.

(iii) Past service costs from plan amendments are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period (9 years) of employees active at the date of the amendment.

(iv) The net actuarial gain (loss) is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period (9 years) of active employees.

(h) Foreign currency translation:

The Association translates foreign currency-denominated transactions and the financial statements of integrated foreign operations into Canadian dollars using the temporal method. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates of exchange in effect at the year-end

F-150

VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands of Canadian dollars)

date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at rates in effect on the dates of the transactions. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates in effect during the year, with the exception of amortization, which is translated at historic rates. Exchange gains and losses on translation are reflected in the consolidated statement of operations in the current year.

(i) Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the year. Accounting estimates have been made with respect to the fair value of the Association’s investments, capitalized software, settlement loss risks, and pension liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

2. Property and equipment:

					2006		2005
	Cost		Accumulated amortization		Net book value		Net book value
Furniture and fixtures	$	1,860	$	1,497	$	363	$	213
Computer equipment		2,258		1,689		569		575
Office equipment		524		510		14		11
Software		1,620		555		1,065		756
Leasehold improvements		3,963		1,835		2,128		1,763
Equipment under capital lease		71		—		71		—
	$	10,296	$	6,086	$	4,210	$	3,318

Property and equipment amortization expense amounted to $975 (2005—$994).

3. Investment:

In 2003, the Association established a wholly owned subsidiary, VCAIII, to hold its 5% interest in Inovant LLC. The investment is accounted for at cost. Inovant LLC was formed to acquire certain data processing operations of Visa International. The cost of the 5% interest in Inovant was U.S. $757.

During 2006, VCAIII received distributions of U.S. nil from Inovant LLC (2005—U.S. $2,636).

4. Employee future benefits:

The Association maintains a defined contribution plan for its employees. In addition, the Association maintains a registered non-contributory defined benefit pension plan and an unfunded supplemental plan covering certain employees.

F-151

VISA CANADA ASSOCIATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(In thousands of Canadian dollars)

Actuarial valuations are made on the defined benefit plans. The most recent valuation was performed as at January 1, 2006 and the next valuation will be required as at a date no later than January 1, 2007. The reconciliation of the funded status of the defined benefit plans to the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements is as follows:

	Registered plan			Supplemental plan
	2006		2005	2006	2005
Accrued benefit obligation	$	2,779