10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 28, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From              To             

Commission File Number: 001-32431

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	90-0199783
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
100 Potrero Avenue San Francisco, CA	94103-4813
(Address of principal executive offices)	( Zip Code)

(415) 558-0200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value	The New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Class B common stock, $0.001 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ý	Accelerated filer  ¨
Non-accelerated filer  ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý

The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 30, 2012 was $1.7 billion. This calculation excludes the shares of Class A and Class B common stock held by executive officers, directors and stockholders whose ownership exceeds 5% of the combined shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding at March 30, 2012. This calculation does not reflect a determination that such persons are affiliates for any other purposes.

On November 2, 2012 the registrant had 45,837,295 shares of Class A common stock and 56,598,329 shares of Class B common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the registrant’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed subsequent to the date hereof, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report. Such Definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the conclusion of the registrant’s fiscal year ended September 28, 2012. Except with respect to information specifically incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, the Definitive Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as part of this Form 10-K.

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item1	—	Business	1
Item1A	—	Risk Factors	12
Item1B	—	Unresolved Staff Comments	28
Item 2	—	Properties	28
Item 3	—	Legal Proceedings	28
Item 4	—	Mine Safety Disclosures	28
PART II
Item 5	—	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	29
Item 6	—	Selected Financial Data	31
Item 7	—	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32
Item 7A	—	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	45
Item 8	—	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	46
Item 9	—	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	80
Item 9A	—	Controls and Procedures	80
Item 9B	—	Other Information	80
PART III
Item 10	—	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	81
Item 11	—	Executive Compensation	82
Item 12	—	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	82
Item 13	—	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	82
Item 14	—	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	82
PART IV
Item 15	—	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	82
Signatures			83

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements including, but not limited to statements regarding: operating results and underlying measures; demand and acceptance for our technologies and products; market growth opportunities and trends; our plans, strategies and expected opportunities; and future competition. Use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue” or similar expressions indicates a forward-looking statement. Such forward-looking statements are based on management’s reasonable current assumptions and expectations. Actual results may differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including the risks set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We disclaim any duty to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform our prior statements to actual results.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Dolby Laboratories has been a leading solutions provider to the entertainment industry for more than 45 years. We provide products, services, and technologies to capture, distribute, and play back entertainment content that gives consumers a premium entertainment experience, regardless of how or where they choose to enjoy it. Our core strengths range from our expertise in digital signal processing and compression technology to our long history of providing products, tools, and technologies to participants in the entertainment industry at each stage in the content creation, distribution, and playback process. We provide products and services that enable content creators and distributors to produce, encode, and transmit content with our premium audio technologies, and we license decoding technologies to the manufacturers of entertainment devices to ensure that content is ultimately experienced as the creator and distributor intended.

Throughout our history, we have introduced numerous innovations that have significantly improved the quality of audio entertainment, such as noise reduction for the recording and cinema industries and surround sound for cinema and home entertainment. Today, we continue to derive the vast majority of our revenue from our audio technologies.

Looking forward, we see a number of industry trends that create opportunities for the continued growth of our audio business, including the ongoing global transition from analog to digital television and consumers' increasing use of mobile devices, such as tablets and smartphones, to play back digital content. Our portfolio of technologies and solutions optimize the audio experience for mobile devices to provide consumers with a rich, clear, and immersive sound, despite the bandwidth limitations of online and cellular networks and the physical limitations of devices with small speakers.

We also see opportunities to apply our core strengths in areas beyond audio. For example, we believe that significant improvements can be made in the technology currently used to deliver and play back premium video, and we have identified solutions that may substantially improve the video experience. Similarly, we believe we can apply our existing audio technologies to improve the clarity and quality of voice communications in areas such as multi-party teleconferencing.

Business Model

We generate the majority of our revenue by licensing technologies to original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”) of consumer entertainment (“CE”) products and to software vendors. We also generate revenue by selling products and related services to creators and distributors and exhibitors of entertainment content.

We participate in the global entertainment industry in three important ways:

• We offer products, services, and technologies to creators and distributors of entertainment content, such as motion picture, television, and music recording studios, television broadcasters, satellite and cable operators, cinema theatre chains, and increasingly, Internet content streaming and download service providers. These content creators and distributors use our products, services, and technologies to encode and transmit content, creating rich, clear, and immersive audio experiences for consumers upon playback.

• We license technologies, such as Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, and Dolby TrueHD to OEMs and software vendors for incorporation into their CE and other products, so that consumers can play back audio content with our technologies in the rich, clear, and immersive manner the creators intended.

• We work directly with standards-setting organizations in the entertainment and technology industries, as well as

1

governments and other regulatory bodies, to promote adoption of our technologies in their standards. As a result, our technologies are included in the majority of worldwide TV shipments to support digital TV standards around the world that mandate our formats. Our technologies are also included in virtually all DVD players, Blu-ray Disc players, audio/video receivers, and personal computer (“PC”) DVD software players.

We license our technologies to OEMs and software vendors in 44 countries, and our licensees distribute products incorporating our technologies throughout the world. We sell our products and services in over 80 countries. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, revenue from outside of the U.S. was 68%, 68%, and 66% of our total revenue, respectively. Our licensing business is our most significant revenue stream, representing 86%, 83%, and 77% of our total revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Geographic data for our licensing revenue is based on the location of our licensees' headquarters. Product revenue is based on the destination to which we ship our products, while services revenue is based on the location where services are performed.

Essential Technologies for the Entertainment Creation, Distribution, and Playback Process

Our long-term involvement in the entertainment industry has enabled us to provide high quality products and services at each step of the entertainment creation, distribution, and playback process.

Content Creation

Our products and services help artists and content producers create and produce an enhanced and immersive entertainment experience by incorporating our technologies in their content. Our encoding technologies help maintain the quality of the sound, while enabling content to fit within the storage capacity and/or bandwidth limitations of a particular content delivery platform. Content creators use our decoding and monitoring products to accurately evaluate how their soundtracks will sound when played back in typical consumer environments.

Many movie, television, music, and video game studios produce content encoded with Dolby technologies that enable digital multichannel sound. Consumers also are able to encode multichannel sound by recording home movies in Dolby Digital using high-definition (“HD”) camcorders. As a result of these available means of content creation, the library of content encoded with Dolby technologies continues to grow.

Content Distribution

Distributors use our professional equipment to support the delivery of content that has been produced using our technologies. For example, broadcasters use our products to encode high quality surround sound content for terrestrial, cable, and satellite transmissions. Our broadcast products also facilitate the editing and routing of surround sound in transmission facilities originally designed for stereo audio. Our sound engineers supplement the efforts of content creators and broadcasters by providing training, system design expertise, and on-site technical assistance to broadcasters throughout the world.

DVD and Blu-ray Disc producers use our professional equipment to encode audio in Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus and Dolby TrueHD so the soundtrack will play as originally recorded on the master copy.

Providers of online content work closely with our team to format their content using our technologies, in order to deliver an optimized audio experience. We work with a growing number of online content aggregators, including Netflix, Amazon, VUDU, Apple, and the Rovi platform, to encode video and audio content with our technologies. We also work with leading music services such as Rhapsody and Omnifone to adopt our audio encoding tools to deliver a rich music experience.

Our high-efficiency advanced audio coding ("HE AAC") and Dolby Digital Plus technologies provide efficient audio delivery solutions that help mitigate constraints associated with transmission or online streaming bandwidth, as well as limited disc storage capacity. These allow mobile content distributors to produce a file compatible with many mobile devices, while lowering storage requirements, reducing download times, and boosting playback quality.

As the means of distribution mature, our technologies have the potential to become the standard or recommended solution in the distribution process. For example, as global broadcast standards for digital television and HD television have developed, many countries have adopted Dolby audio technologies as part of their standards. In North America, Dolby Digital is the standard audio technology for digital terrestrial and cable television. In Europe, Dolby Digital Plus is the European Broadcast Union’s recommended audio technology for HD broadcast. A number of European countries, including France, Italy, the UK, and Poland, have adopted Dolby Digital Plus and HE AAC in their HD terrestrial broadcast standards and other countries, such as Brazil, have adopted HE AAC. In addition, Dolby Digital Plus is now offered by commercial satellite providers throughout Europe as part of their HD services. In the Asia Pacific region, China has selected Dolby Digital and Dolby Digital Plus as optional technologies for the country’s Digital Terrestrial Television specification. South Korea has adopted the Advanced Television Systems Committee ("ATSC") standard for digital television, which includes Dolby Digital, while Japan has adopted advanced audio coding (“AAC”) as its audio technology standard for digital television. We are one of

2

the original four developers of AAC, and we receive a portion of AAC licensing revenue through a joint patent licensing program. We receive AAC licensing revenue both as a patent holder and an administrator of the patent licensing program, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Via Licensing Corporation.

These products, services, and technologies are used throughout the content creation and distribution process, enabling the final step in the cycle: the content playback process.

Content Playback

Our decoding technologies allow content created and distributed using our technologies to be played back as the creator and distributor intended. Manufacturers of DVD players and Blu-ray Disc players throughout the world incorporate our decoding technologies to enhance the audio experience, and the majority of PC OEMs incorporate our technologies for the support of optical discs. Dolby technologies are also widely incorporated in many other devices, such as digital televisions, video game consoles, home-theaters-in-a-box, and audio/video receivers. We have an opportunity to further our position in mobile device, set-top box, and camcorder markets.

In some cases, our licensees sell products incorporating our technologies to other OEMs, which then incorporate these products in automobiles, PCs, or other products sold to consumers. Our trademarks are often displayed on content and CE products that incorporate our technologies to indicate to consumers that a product meets our technical and quality standards.

For many types of CE products, our technologies are included in explicit industry standards, as standards-setting bodies mandate their inclusion in a particular type of product. For example, Dolby Digital is the standard audio technology for digital televisions in North America and is mandated in all DVD and Blu-ray Disc players worldwide. Alternatively, Dolby technologies are de facto industry standards in many CE products, and while not specifically mandated by a standards board, are widely adopted for a particular type of product. For example, prior to the adoption of HD terrestrial broadcast standards mandating Dolby technologies, many European HD broadcasters began broadcasting in Dolby Digital or Dolby Digital Plus, leading CE OEMs to include these technologies in their televisions and set-top boxes for the European market.

Growth Strategy

The entertainment industry is in transition. Today content is captured, delivered, and played back in more ways than ever before. Consumers can experience entertainment through multiple channels, including cinema, optical disc, digital broadcast, online, and cellular networks. As consumers are presented with more options for receiving content, competition across delivery channels has intensified, and we see this reflected in the composition of our licensing revenue. Non-optical disc based revenue comprised an estimated 57%, 52%, and 45% of our licensing business in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. This includes licensing revenue derived from products such as TVs, set-top boxes, and mobile phones, as well as our post-processing technologies on a range of devices. Non-optical disc based licensing revenue grew 10% in fiscal 2012 and 27% in fiscal 2011. Conversely, optical disc based licensing revenue was 43%, 48%, and 55% in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Optical disc based licensing revenue is derived primarily from the Windows 7 operating system, independent PC DVD software players, DVD, and Blu-ray Disc. However, most of those products receive content over mobile or online networks, in addition to optical disc, and we have increased our technology penetration into these distribution channels.

Looking forward, we expect continued growth in the percentage of licensing revenue we derive from non-optical disc sources. This will be driven partly by the maturity of optical disc, but also by the significant opportunities presented by digital broadcast and online distribution, where we remain focused on delivering the products, tools, and technologies needed to ensure a high quality audio experience from any device. We also see significant opportunities to offer encode/decode solutions in video and voice that leverage our expertise in signal processing, compression, and the capture and playback of content.

Our Core Business

In our broadcast market we derive revenue from licensing our technologies to OEMs of televisions and set-top boxes. While we have experienced success in driving the adoption of our technologies in digital broadcast, we believe there are still significant opportunities for growth in the adoption of our multichannel technologies, as countries transition from analog to digital broadcast and offer increasing amounts of HD content. The efficiency and quality of our multichannel technologies are well suited to digital broadcast bandwidth requirements and to delivering a premium HD content experience. As a result, our multichannel technologies have been adopted in terrestrial digital television standards throughout the world. In fiscal 2012, we estimate that approximately 65% of global TV shipments and approximately 50% of global set-top box shipments contained our technologies, leaving a substantial additional market opportunity.

The growth of the Internet, accompanied by a shift toward online content consumption, has resulted in a global consumer trend toward an array of online streaming and download services. Content creators are increasingly focused on delivering content across a multitude of media and devices with varying bandwidth and performance requirements, including PCs, connected TVs, set-top boxes, gaming consoles, connected Blu-ray Disc players, and mobile devices. Many of these devices

3

are increasingly designed to capture and send content through improved camera and WiFi technologies, as well as play back rich media experiences. This increasingly complex array of devices, aimed at both creating and consuming content, presents a challenge for content creators and device manufacturers seeking consistent audio quality. We believe this challenge provides an opportunity similar to that of digital broadcast, whereby we can deliver the industry solutions to optimize the audio experience across the online and portable device ecosystem.

While the rapid advancement of online content delivery is enabling the development of new portable playback devices such as tablets and smartphones, it also provides PC OEMs with an alternative to the optical disc platform. Currently, a portion of our revenue comes from the inclusion of our technologies in the optical disc platform, and we expect online delivery to ultimately replace optical disc as the delivery platform for the PC and other devices. Therefore, we are focused on extending the use of our technologies in the PC market to online and mobile content.

In our PC market we have derived revenue from the inclusion of our technologies in most PC shipments, due largely to the inclusion of our technologies in various versions of Microsoft operating systems. In May 2012, we entered into an agreement with Microsoft under which Dolby Digital Plus 5.1 channel decoding and Dolby Digital two-channel encoding will be included in all PCs and tablets licensed to run the Windows 8 operating system. Under the arrangement, OEMs generally will be required to directly license and pay us a base royalty rate for the right to use the Dolby technologies included in Windows 8 installed on the PCs and tablets they produce for online and file-based content. OEMs will be required to pay a higher per-unit royalty for Windows 8 PCs that also include optical disc playback functionality, which will be implemented by ISV applications. This higher rate is consistent with rates paid historically for the inclusion of Dolby disc playback software in the PC market. In the near term, we expect the majority of PCs to continue to ship with optical disc drives and to include optical disc playback functionality. For additional information on our PC market and associated risks, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

Developing New Audio Entertainment Technologies

Through our long history of innovation in audio technology, and the established presence of our multichannel technologies in many of the world’s most popular content playback devices, we believe that we are well positioned to develop and deliver new audio innovations. Specifically, our expertise in signal processing and compression technologies, coupled with our ability to deliver an integrated solution across complex market ecosystems, enable us to offer new technologies that elevate the entertainment experience. We also believe the presence of our technologies in many existing professional and consumer devices, along with our recognized brand, are key strengths as we strive to bring additional technology innovations to market. In April 2012, we announced Dolby Atmos, a new audio platform for cinema that delivers a more natural and realistic sound-field. Since the introduction of Dolby Atmos, nine major Hollywood titles have been announced or released from five studios, including The Hobbit, to be released in December 2012.

Developing Video Technologies

Our success in audio has resulted in part from our ability to develop and deliver the products, services, tools, and technologies needed to capture, deliver, and play back a consistent, high quality audio experience across multiple channels. We believe these core competencies can be applied to video to significantly improve the technology currently used to deliver premium video to displays. In the cinema market, we offer exhibitors our digital cinema servers and other 3D digital cinema products, which deliver a vivid movie experience with sharp images and natural colors.

We also offer a Professional Reference Monitor, a flat-panel video reference display for video professionals. These professionals use our monitor for color critical tasks, such as calibrating color accuracy to professional reference standards. Our Professional Reference Monitor uses our dynamic range imaging technologies, which enable enhanced contrast, extended brightness, and dynamic range, along with reduced power consumption in LED backlit LCD televisions.

Developing Voice Technologies

With the growth of voice transmission over Internet protocol networks and the proliferation of devices that connect to these networks, the quality of the voice experience has progressively deteriorated. We believe that our expertise in sound signal processing and compression technologies can address some of these problems, and in particular that our entertainment technologies can be adapted and applied to voice communications to significantly improve voice quality and clarity in a variety of uses. In September 2012, BT Conferencing announced a trial using Dolby Voice technology in their conferencing services to enable audio conference calls that sound and feel more like in-person meetings.

Building on the Strength of the Dolby Brand

We are building on the strength of the Dolby brand to enhance our reputation as a trusted provider of entertainment technologies for professional and consumer applications and to assist us in bringing new audio and video technologies to

4

market.

We actively encourage our customers to place our trademarks on their products in conjunction with the inclusion of our technologies. In particular, we provide marketing materials such as posters, trailers, and plaques to cinema operators to help them promote the quality of experience that is associated with our brand.

The inclusion of the Dolby trademark on a product informs audiences and consumers that the product incorporates our technologies and meets our quality standards, and we believe this helps CE OEMs sell their products. We will continue to encourage the use of our trademarks throughout the entertainment industry as an indicator to both professionals and consumers of consistent quality at each stage of the entertainment process.

Addressing Ongoing Content Creator Needs

We believe that technology innovations for entertainment will continue to be adopted first for professional use, as filmmakers, music producers, broadcasters, and video game designers look for ways to excite their audiences. We are collaborating with industry professionals to develop new technologies that facilitate and improve content recording, distribution, and playback. Our professional technology solutions often have applicability to the consumer arena, and when they apply, we intend to continue to adapt these technologies for use in consumer applications. Our noise reduction, surround sound, and digital audio technologies were all initially developed for professional use and later adapted for use in CE products. We believe that our success in developing technologies for professional use contributes greatly to the appeal of our technologies and brand for consumer use.

Promoting the Adoption of Dolby Technologies in Industry Standards

As the entertainment industry evolves toward global technical standards for content creation, delivery, and playback, we actively seek to have our technologies included in industry standards. We develop, maintain, and strengthen relationships across the broad spectrum of entertainment industry participants, professional organizations, and global standards-setting bodies.

Revenue Generation

We generate revenue in three primary ways: licensing our technologies to a broad range of customers, selling video and audio products for the cinema and broadcast industries, and providing a variety of services to support production activities.

We generate a significant portion of our revenue from outside the U.S. Geographic data for our licensing revenue is based on the location of our licensees’ headquarters. Products revenue is based on the destination to which we ship our products, while services revenue is based on the location where services are performed. Financial information by geographic area is set forth in Note 11 “Geographic Data” to our consolidated financial statements. For risks attendant to our foreign operations, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

Licensing

We license our technologies to software vendors and to OEMs of CE products such as digital televisions, set-top boxes, DVD players and recorders, Blu-ray Disc players, video game consoles, audio/video receivers, mobile devices, in-car entertainment systems, home-theater-in-a-box systems, PCs, camcorders, and portable media devices. Our licensing arrangements typically entitle us to receive a specified royalty for every product shipped by our licensees that incorporates our technologies. We also collect fees for administering joint patent licensing programs (informally known as “patent pools”) on behalf of third parties. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, our licensing revenue represented 86%, 83%, and 77% of our total revenue, respectively. We have three primary licensing models: a two-tier model, an integrated licensing model, and a patent pool model.

Two-Tier Licensing Model.    Most of our CE licensing business consists of a two-tier licensing model whereby our decoding technologies, included in reference software and firmware code, are first provided under license to a semiconductor manufacturer. The manufacturer then incorporates our technologies in integrated circuits (“IC”). Our licensed semiconductor manufacturers, which we refer to as “implementation licensees,” sell their ICs to OEMs of CE products, which we refer to as “system licensees.” Our system licensees separately obtain licenses from us that allow them to make and sell end-user CE products that incorporate our technologies in ICs purchased from our implementation licensees.

Our implementation licensees may use our reference software and other licensed know-how directly to build and sell core technologies such as ICs. The implementation licensees pay us a one-time, up-front administrative fee per license. In exchange, the licensee receives a licensing package, which includes information useful in implementing our technologies into its chipsets. Once the chipset has been built, the licensee sends us a sample for quality control evaluation. If we approve the implementation design, the licensee is permitted to sell the chipset only to our system licensees.

5

Our system licensees pay us an initial fee for the technologies they choose to license from us. We deliver a licensing package to each system licensee, which includes information on using our technologies in the licensee’s products. System licensees are required to provide us with prototypes of products that incorporate our technologies for quality control evaluation, or under certain circumstances, with self-test results for our review. If the design is approved, the licensee is permitted to buy ICs from any Dolby implementation licensee and to sell approved products to retailers, distributors, and consumers. Sales by system licensees of CE products incorporating our technologies are royalty-bearing, generally based upon the number of product units shipped. We have active licensing arrangements with approximately 515 electronics product OEMs and software developer licensees, with corporate headquarters located in 44 countries.

The amount of royalties we collect from a system licensee on a particular product depends on a number of factors, such as the number of Dolby technologies used in that product and the total production volume for all products incorporating our technologies that are shipped by the system licensee.

Integrated Licensing Model.    In addition to licensing under our two-tier licensing model, we also license our technologies, as included in reference software code, to operating system vendors and independent software vendors ("ISVs"), and to certain other CE OEMs that act as combined implementation and system licensees. These licensees incorporate our technologies (in their software such as PC software DVD players) used in desktop or notebook computers, in their mobile applications, or in ICs they manufacture and incorporate into CE products. As with the two-tier licensing model, the combined implementation and system licensee pays us an initial administrative fee. In exchange, the licensee receives a licensing package, which includes information on how to incorporate our technologies into the licensee’s software program or integrated circuits. Once the product has been built, the licensee sends us a sample, or under certain circumstances self-test results, for quality control evaluation. If the sample is approved, the licensee is permitted to sell the product to retailers, distributors, and consumers, subject to the payment of royalties.

Licensing of Patent Pools.    Through our wholly owned subsidiary, Via Licensing Corporation, we administer joint patent licensing programs, or patent pools, on behalf of third party patent owners. Some of the patent pools also include Dolby patents. These patent pools allow product OEMs streamlined access to certain essential patents to standardized technologies in the fields of audio coding, interactive television, digital radio, and wireless technologies.

Products

We design and manufacture video and audio products for the film production, cinema, and television broadcast industries. Distributed in over 70 countries, these products are used in content creation, distribution, and playback to enhance image and sound quality, provide surround sound, and increase the efficiency of sound storage and distribution. Our product sales are derived from sales of our digital cinema servers, which load, store, decrypt, and decode encrypted digital film files for presentation on digital projectors in theaters, as well as from sales of digital 3D products and our Professional Reference Monitor.

We also derive revenue from sales of our traditional cinema processors, which movie theaters use to process film soundtracks, and to a lesser extent, from sales of broadcast products used to encode and distribute content to viewers. We offer related digital cinema processors and media adapters to decode digital cinema soundtracks, as well as digital cinema accessories that allow exhibitors to easily integrate our digital cinema servers with their existing automation systems. Digital cinema is based on open standards which, unlike standards for the traditional cinema market, do not include our proprietary audio technologies. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 our product revenue represented 11%, 14%, and 20% of our total revenue, respectively.

Services

We offer a variety of services to support film production, television broadcast, and music production. Our engineers work alongside filmmakers, television broadcasters, and music producers, helping them use our products and technologies to create and reproduce content as they envision. We typically enter into service agreements with motion picture studios or filmmakers to provide production services related to the preparation of a Dolby soundtrack, such as equipment calibration, mixing room alignment, and equalization. Under these agreements, we provide our encoders to the studios for use during sound mixing, enabling them to create films with Dolby soundtracks using our proprietary technologies.

We provide other services such as print quality control, professional film mastering services to prepare movies for digital release, and theater system calibration for important screenings, such as premieres, film festivals, and press screenings. Our engineers also provide training, system design consultation, and on-site technical expertise to cinema operators throughout the world to help them configure their screening rooms and equipment, in order to ensure that movies are replayed with consistently high quality. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 our services revenue represented 3%, 3%, and 3% of our total revenue, respectively.

6

Our Technologies and Products

Our core technologies are signal processing systems that deliver rich, clear, and immersive sound in movie soundtracks, DVDs, Blu-ray Discs, personal computers, digital televisions, mobile devices, video games, satellite and cable broadcasts, and online streaming. Many of our technologies are incorporated into professional products that we manufacture, including cinema sound processors and digital audio encoders and decoders. We have also expanded our focus on developing and delivering new audio and video technologies that enhance the entertainment experience, including audio technologies for mobile devices and video technologies for 3D, digital cinema, post-production, and LED backlit LCD televisions.

Our Technologies

• Dolby Atmos – Dolby Atmos is a new audio platform that uses a hybrid approach that combines multi-channel audio with discrete audio objects. This approach provides more flexibility and control for sound designers and mixers to deliver a more natural and realistic sound environment.

• Dolby Digital – Dolby Digital is a digital audio coding technology used to provide surround sound in theaters and in the home from DVDs, digital terrestrial broadcast, cable, and satellite systems. Dolby Digital enables the storage and transmission of up to five full range audio channels plus a low frequency effects channel.

• Dolby Digital Plus – Dolby Digital Plus is a digital audio coding technology built as an extension to Dolby Digital technologies. With the addition of new coding techniques and an expanded bitstream structure, Dolby Digital Plus offers greater efficiency for lower bit rates, as well as the option for more channels and higher bit rates. Dolby Digital Plus can support a wide range of current and emerging applications such as digital television, mobile, and Internet based content services. Dolby Digital is compatible with all existing Dolby Digital Plus equipped consumer electronics.

• Dolby Digital Surround EX – Dolby Digital Surround EX adds a third surround channel to the Dolby Digital format in cinemas. The third channel is reproduced by rear wall surround speakers, while the left and right surround channels are reproduced by speakers on the side walls.

• Dolby Digital EX – Dolby Digital EX adds a third surround channel to Dolby Digital in CE products for the home.

• Dolby TrueHD – Dolby TrueHD is an audio delivery technology that delivers bit-for-bit performance upon playback identical to the original studio master. When applied with HD video content, the coding efficiencies of Dolby TrueHD enable content providers to include a 100% lossless audio track on Blu-ray Disc without using excessive storage capacity.

• Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) – AAC is a high quality audio coding technology appropriate for many broadcast and electronic music distribution applications. We are one of the original four developers of this technology.

• HE AAC – HE AAC is a highly efficient, high quality audio compression technology designed for broadcast, download and streaming content. HE AAC adds spectral band replication to AAC. We are one of the primary developers of this technology.

• Dolby E – Dolby E is a professional digital audio coding system developed to assist with the conversion of two channel broadcast facilities to multichannel audio.

• Dolby Digital Live – Dolby Digital Live is a real time encoding technology that converts any audio signal into a Dolby Digital bitstream for transport and playback to a home theater system. Dolby Digital Live enables connection of a PC or game console to a Dolby Digital equipped audio/video receiver or digital speaker system via a single digital connection.

• Dolby Pro Logic II – Dolby Pro Logic II is a matrix surround decoding technology that detects the naturally occurring directional cues in two channel audio content and transforms the content into five playback channels of full bandwidth surround sound.

• Dolby Pro Logic II(x) – Dolby Pro Logic II(x) extends the Pro Logic II technology to seven playback channels.

• Dolby Pro Logic IIz – Dolby Pro Logic IIz is Dolby’s newest matrix decoding technology, which adds the dimension of height to surround sound playback.

• PC Entertainment Experience or PCEE – PCEE is a suite of technologies for entertainment-oriented PCs, which enhance the audio quality of media.

• Dolby Headphone – Dolby Headphone technology provides the sound of a five speaker surround playback system through any pair of headphones by modeling the surround sound listening experience of a properly calibrated 5.1 channel speaker system.

7

• Dolby Mobile – Dolby Mobile is a suite of post processing technologies optimized for mobile devices and designed to enhance the audio quality of media delivered on the device.

• Dolby Digital Stereo Creator – Dolby Digital Stereo Creator allows users to author DVDs with Dolby Digital stereo soundtracks.

• Dolby Digital 5.1 Creator – Dolby Digital 5.1 Creator enables users to record home movies with Dolby Digital surround sound.

• Dolby Volume – Dolby Volume is an audio leveling technology for CE devices and provides consistent volume and quality across various programs.

• Dolby Virtual Speaker – Dolby Virtual Speaker is an audio virtualization technology that simulates the effect of natural, realistic surround sound from just two stereo speakers. Dolby Virtual Speaker transforms TV, movies, and recorded music into a surround sound experience for anyone with a two speaker system.

• Dolby HDR – Dolby’s HDR technologies increase the contrast ratio of LED backlit LCD televisions through the use of local dimming.

• Analog Signal Processing Technologies – Our analog signal processing technologies, including our noise reduction technologies, improve the sound quality of cassette tapes and film by reducing background noise and extending the overall dynamic range of analog media.

Our Products

• Digital Cinema Products – Digital Cinema Products are used for digital cinema encoding, distribution, and playback. Our digital cinema server is used to load, store, decrypt, decode, and re-encrypt digital film files for presentation on a digital cinema projector. We also provide products that encrypt, encode, and package digital films, and digital cinema processors to decode digital cinema soundtracks.

• Digital 3D Products – Digital 3D Products deliver a 3D image with an existing digital cinema server and white (or silver) screen, providing exhibitors a flexible 3D solution. Our Dolby 3D glasses feature high quality multicoated lenses that deliver sharp 3D images.

• Digital Media Adapters – Digital Media Adapters are used to convert existing analog cinema audio systems to the latest digital audio technologies.

• Traditional Cinema Processors – Traditional Cinema Processors are used to read, decode, and play back a film soundtrack and calibrate the sound system in a movie theater.

• Broadcast Products – Broadcast Products are used to encode, transmit, and decode multiple channels of high quality audio for DTV and HDTV program production and broadcast distribution and to measure the subjective loudness of audio content within broadcast programming.

• Professional Reference Monitor – Professional Reference Monitor is a video monitor used during the production and post-production of cinematic and video content in situations where grade 1 reference performance is required.

Industry Standards

Certain of our technologies have been adopted as the explicit or de facto industry standard. Explicit industry standards are adopted through a formal negotiated standards process, whereby government entities, industry standards-setting bodies, trade associations, and others evaluate and then prescribe or require the use of a technology. We participate in a broad spectrum of organizations and industry standards bodies worldwide that establish explicit industry standards. De facto industry standards are adopted by industry participants when technologies are introduced to the marketplace and become widely used.

Sales and Marketing

We sell and market technologies, products, and services throughout the entertainment industry through an internal sales staff and through distributors. We maintain sales offices in the U.S., the United Kingdom, Japan, China, Taiwan, Germany, France, Spain, Dubai, the Netherlands, South Korea, Russia, and India.

We focus our marketing efforts on consumer electronics, personal computer, broadcast, cinema, production services, gaming, automotive, video, and mobile markets. We reach these markets primarily through industry trade shows, public relations, our website, partner events, and direct marketing.

8

Products and Technology

Research and Development

Historically, we have focused our research and development primarily on audio signal processing technologies. Increasingly, we have expanded our research and development efforts into new audio, voice, and video areas. By focusing on creation, proof of feasibility, and early stage prototyping of patentable new audio, voice, image, and related technologies, our research groups serve as a source of new technologies for the engineering and technology development teams. The research groups also help identify, investigate, and analyze new long-term opportunities, help develop our technology strategy, and provide support for internally developed and externally acquired technologies.

Engineering and technology development teams take the technologies developed by the research group to further develop for use in our professional products and by our licensees. In addition, our engineering and technology development teams are involved in the commercialization of technologies created by third parties.

We conduct our research and development activities at a number of locations, including Burbank, San Francisco, and Sunnyvale, California, Yardley, Pennsylvania, Indianapolis, Indiana, Sydney, Australia, Stockholm, Sweden, Beijing, China, and Nuremberg and Berlin, Germany, Wroclaw, Poland. Our research and development expenses were $140.1 million, $123.9 million, and $105.0 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Product Manufacturing

Our product quality is enabled through the use of well established, and in some cases highly automated, assembly processes along with rigorous testing of our products.

We have a single production facility and we also use contract manufacturers for a significant portion of our production capacity. We purchase components and fabricated parts from multiple suppliers; however, we rely on sole source suppliers for certain components used to manufacture our products. We source components and fabricated parts both locally and globally in order to provide for continued supply.

Customers

We license our technologies to a broad range of customers, including software vendors, such as operating system vendors and ISVs, IC manufacturers, and manufacturers of home audio and video products, set-top boxes, video game consoles, mobile devices, in-car entertainment systems, and PCs.

Our customers operate in a wide range of entertainment industries, and we sell our professional products either directly to the end user or, more commonly, through dealers and distributors. Users of our professional products and services include movie studios, cinema operators, film distributors, broadcasters, and video game designers.

Microsoft Corporation is one of our licensees and accounted for approximately 14%, 13%, and 12% of our total revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Most of our Microsoft revenue is generated from the Windows 7 operating system, which contains our technologies. In May 2012, we entered into an agreement with Microsoft under which Dolby Digital Plus 5.1 channel decoding and Dolby Digital two-channel encoding will be included in all PCs and tablets licensed to run the Windows 8 operating system. Under the arrangement, OEMs generally will be required to directly license and pay us a base royalty rate for the right to use the Dolby technologies included in Windows 8 installed on the PCs and tablets they produce for online and file-based content. OEMs will be required to pay a higher per-unit royalty for Windows 8 PCs that also include optical disc playback functionality, which will be implemented by ISV applications. This higher rate is consistent with rates paid historically for the inclusion of Dolby disc playback software in the PC market. In the near term, we expect the majority of PCs to continue to ship with optical disc drives and to include optical disc playback functionality. Additional information relating to Microsoft and Windows 8 is set forth in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Competition

The markets for entertainment industry technologies are highly competitive, and we face competitive threats and pricing pressure in our markets. Competitors for our licensed technologies include: Audyssey Laboratories, DTS, Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits, Microsoft, Monster Cable Products, Philips, RealNetworks, Rovi, Sony, Thomson, and Waves Audio. Competitors for our products include: Barco, Doremi, GDC, IMAX, MasterImage 3D, NEC, Panavision, QSC Audio Products, Qube Cinema, REAL D, Sony, Technicolor, USL, and XpanD. Competitors for our services include DTS and Sony. In addition, other companies may become competitors in the future.

Some of our current and future competitors may have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and other resources than we do, or may have more experience or advantages in the markets in which they compete. For example, some of our current or potential competitors may have an advantage over us in the market for online technologies because of their

9

greater experience in that market. In addition, some of our current or potential competitors may be able to offer integrated system solutions in certain markets for entertainment technologies, including audio, video, and rights management technologies related to PCs or the Internet, which could make competing technologies that we develop or acquire unnecessary. By offering an integrated system solution, these potential competitors may also be able to offer competing technologies at lower prices than we can, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We also face competitive risks in situations where our customers are current or potential competitors. For example, Sony and Microsoft are significant licensee customers, and are also competitors with respect to some of our broadcast and consumer technologies.

Many of the CE products that include our audio technologies also include audio technologies developed by our competitors. We believe that the principal competitive factors in each of our markets include some or all of the following:

• Inclusion in explicit industry standards;

• Adoption as de facto industry standards;

• Brand recognition and reputation;

• Quality and reliability of products and services;

• Technology performance, flexibility, and range of application;

• Relationships with producers, directors, and distributors in the film industry, with television broadcast industry leaders, and with the management of semiconductor and consumer electronics OEMs;

• Availability of compatible high quality audio content and the inclusion of Dolby Digital soundtracks on DVDs;

• Price; and

• Timeliness and relevance of new product introductions.

We believe we compete favorably with respect to many of these factors.

In general, we are unable to quantify our market share in any particular market in which we operate. Our products and services span the audio portions of several distinct and diverse industries, including the cinema, broadcasting, video game, and recording industries. The lack of clear definition of the markets in which our products, services, and technologies are sold or licensed, the basic nature of our technologies, which can be used for a variety of purposes, and the diverse nature of and lack of detailed reporting by our competitors make it impracticable to quantify our position.

Intellectual Property

We have a substantial base of intellectual property assets, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets such as know-how.

As of September 28, 2012, we had nearly 2,800 individual issued patents, and over 2,700 pending patent applications, in over 80 jurisdictions throughout the world. The currently issued patents are scheduled to expire at various times through November 2032.

Some of our patents relating to Dolby Digital technologies, from which we derive a significant part of our licensing revenue, have expired and others will expire over the next several years. We have transitioned a number of our Dolby Digital licensees to Dolby Digital Plus technologies, an extension of our Dolby Digital technologies, whose patents generally expire later than the Dolby Digital patents. We are continuing to make progress in transitioning other Dolby Digital licensees to Dolby Digital Plus.

We pursue a general practice of filing patent applications for our technologies in the U.S. and various foreign countries where our customers manufacture, distribute, or sell licensed products. We actively pursue new applications to expand our patent portfolio to address new technology innovations. We have multiple patents covering unique aspects and improvements for many of our technologies.

We have over 923 trademark registrations throughout the world for a variety of word marks, logos, and slogans. Our marks cover our various products, technologies, improvements, and features, as well as the services that we provide. Our trademarks are an integral part of our technology licensing program, and licensees typically elect to place our trademarks on their products to inform consumers that their products incorporate our technology and meet our quality specifications. Our trademarks include the following:

10

Examples of our Word Trademarks

•   Dolby •   Dolby Digital •   Dolby Digital Plus •   Dolby Home Theater •   Dolby Mobile •   Dolby Headphone •   Dolby TrueHD •   Dolby Digital Cinema

Examples of our Logo Trademarks

We protect our intellectual property rights both domestically and internationally. In the past, however, we have experienced problems with OEMs of CE products in emerging economies. OEMs have failed to report or underreported shipments of their products that incorporate our technologies. We have also had problems with implementation licensees selling ICs with our technologies to third parties that are not system licensees. We anticipate that such problems will continue to occur in the future.

Moreover, we have relatively few or no issued patents in certain countries. For example, in China, Taiwan, and India, we have only limited patent protection, especially with respect to our Dolby Digital technologies. In India, we have no issued patents for Dolby Digital technologies. Consequently, in the future we may recognize less revenue from Dolby Digital from those regions. Maintaining or growing our licensing revenue in developing countries such as China, Taiwan, and India will depend in part on our ability to obtain patent rights in these counties, which is uncertain. Further, because of the limitations of the legal systems in many countries, the effectiveness of patents obtained or that may in the future be obtained, if any, is uncertain.

Employees

As of September 28, 2012, we had 1,480 employees worldwide, of which 557 employees were based outside of the U.S. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our employee relations are good.

Corporate and Available Information

We were founded in London, England in 1965 and incorporated as a New York corporation in 1967. We reincorporated in California in 1976 and reincorporated in Delaware in September 2004. Our principal corporate offices are located at 100 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California 94103, and our telephone number is (415) 558-0200.

Our Internet address is www.dolby.com. We make available on our website, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our SEC reports can be accessed through the Investor Relations section of our Internet website. The information found on our Internet website is not part of this or any other report we file with or furnish to the SEC.

11

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we presently deem less significant may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

We depend on the sale by our licensees of products that incorporate our technologies and any reduction in those sales would adversely affect our licensing revenue.

Licensing revenue constitutes the majority of our total revenue, representing 86%, 83%, and 77% in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. We do not manufacture consumer entertainment products ourselves and we depend on licensees and customers, including software vendors and original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”), to incorporate our technologies into their products.

Although we have license agreements with many of these companies, these agreements generally do not have minimum purchase commitments, are non-exclusive, and do not generally require incorporation or use of our technologies. Accordingly, our revenue will decline if our licensees choose not to incorporate our technologies in their products, or if they sell fewer products incorporating our technologies, or if they otherwise face significant economic difficulties. Changes in consumer tastes or trends, rapidly evolving technology, competing products, changes in industry standards or adverse changes in business and economic conditions, among other things, may result in lower sales of products incorporating our technologies which would adversely affect our licensing revenue.

We also face the risk that our licensees retain product channel inventory levels that exceed future anticipated sales. If such product sales do not occur in the time frame anticipated by our licensees for any reason, these licensees may substantially decrease the number of technologies they license from us in subsequent periods.

To the extent that sales of PCs with Dolby technologies decline, our licensing revenue will be adversely affected.

Revenue from our PC market depends on several factors, including underlying PC unit shipment growth, the extent to which our technologies are included on computers, through operating systems, independent software vendors (“ISV”) media applications, or otherwise, and the terms of any royalties or other payments we receive from licensors of such software. We face many risks in the PC market that may affect our ability to successfully participate in that market, including, but not limited to the following:

• Purchasing trends away from traditional PCs and toward computing devices without optical disc drives, such as ultrabooks and tablets, which may not include our technologies;

• The availability and market appeal of PC software that includes our technologies on an unauthorized and infringing basis, for which we receive no royalty payments; and

• Continued decreasing inclusion of ISV media applications by PC OEMs in their Windows 7- based PCs, as Windows 7 already incorporates DVD playback software.

In May 2012, we entered into an agreement with Microsoft relating to the inclusion of Dolby Digital Plus decoding and Dolby Digital Consumer Encoder in the Windows 8 operating system. There are no assurances that we will derive as much licensing revenue under this model as we did under our prior licensing arrangements with Microsoft. The ultimate financial impact of these licensing arrangements for Windows 8 on our licensing revenue is subject to various risks, including:

• The extent and rate at which Windows 8 is adopted in the marketplace;

• The extent to which OEMs include optical disc playback in Windows 8 devices;

• The extent to which earlier versions of Microsoft operating systems, including Windows 7, continue to be licensed after the release of Windows 8;

• Our ability to establish and extend licensing relationships directly with PC OEMs and ISVs;

• The rate at which entertainment content shifts from optical disc media to online media, thus reducing the need for PCs to have optical disc drives and DVD and Blu-ray Disc software players; and

• Our ability to extend the adoption of our technologies to online and mobile platforms and devices.

Any of these risks could adversely affect our licensing revenue.

12

General economic conditions may reduce our revenue and harm our business.

We continue to be cautious regarding future general economic conditions and their potential for suppressed consumer demand in the markets in which we license our technologies and sell our products. Our business could be affected by adverse changes in general economic conditions, because many of the products in which our technologies are incorporated are discretionary goods, such as PCs, digital televisions, set-top boxes, DVD players and recorders, Blu-ray Disc players, video game consoles, audio/video receivers, mobile devices, in-car entertainment systems, home-theater-in-a-box systems, camcorders, and portable media devices. The global economic environment has adversely affected consumer confidence, disposable income, and spending. While we cannot predict future general economic conditions, these conditions may persist or worsen.

Furthermore, continued weakness in general economic conditions may result in a greater likelihood that more of our licensees and customers will become delinquent on their obligations to us or be unable to pay, which in turn could result in a higher level of write-offs. Additionally, such economic conditions may result in increased underreporting and non-reporting of royalty-bearing revenue by our licensees as well as increased unauthorized use of our technologies, all of which would adversely affect our revenues.

Our future success depends upon the growth of new and existing markets for our technologies and our ability to develop and adapt our technologies for those markets.

The future growth of our licensing revenue will depend, in part, upon the growth of, and our successful participation in, new and existing markets for our technologies, such as digital broadcast, online and mobile media distribution, consumer video and voice. For example, growth of our broadcast revenue is dependent upon continued global growth of digital television broadcasting and the adoption of our technologies into emerging digital broadcast standards. In addition, our revenue is dependent upon the growth of the PC market and the continued adoption of our technologies into PCs as well as the adoption of our technologies into connected portable devices such as tablets and smartphones. Furthermore, our ability to drive OEM demand for our technologies depends in part on whether or not we are able to successfully participate in the online and mobile content delivery markets.

Our ability to penetrate new and existing markets for our technologies depends on increased consumer demand for products that contain our technologies, which may not occur. Some of these markets are ones in which we have not previously participated or have limited experience, such as voice and consumer video, and we may not adequately adapt our business and our technologies to consumer demand.

If new and existing markets for our technologies do not develop or consumer demand for products that contain our technologies does not grow, our business and prospects would be materially adversely affected.

If we do not continue to develop and deliver innovative technologies in response to industry and technology changes, our business could decline.

The markets for our technologies and products are defined by:

• Rapid technological change;

• New and improved technology and product introductions;

• Changing consumer and licensee demands;

• Evolving industry standards; and

• Technology and product obsolescence.

Our future success depends on our ability to enhance our existing technologies and products and to develop acceptable new technologies and products that address the needs of the market in a timely manner. The development of enhanced and new technologies and products is a complex and uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation, highly-skilled engineering and development personnel, and the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. We may not be able to identify, develop, acquire, market, or support new or enhanced technologies or products on a timely basis, if at all. For example, while we view the continued advancements in online and mobile media content delivery as an area of opportunity, if we are not able to competitively address the needs of the changing online and mobile markets, our ability to generate revenue from those markets would be limited. At times, such changes can be dramatic, such as the shift from VHS tapes to DVDs for consumer playback of movies in homes and elsewhere.

13

We face many risks related to the 3D cinema market.

We face many risks in the 3D cinema market which may affect our ability to successfully participate in that market, including, but not limited to the following:

• We face risks that our customers maintain excess product inventory levels which could reduce future anticipated sales;

• At least one of our competitors has exclusive licensing arrangements for 3D products with theater exhibitors, which has in the past and we expect will in the future restrict our ability to compete in the 3D market;

• The 3D market has become increasingly competitive and we may lose further market share;

• With the industry transition to 3D enabled screens substantially complete, demand for new 3D enabled screens has dropped significantly and the industry has entered into a replacement cycle;

• Industry participants may perceive our up-front 3D equipment costs and reusable glasses business model or our 3D products as less attractive;

• Our participation in the 3D cinema market will be limited to the extent theaters do not convert from analog to digital cinema;

• Demand for our 3D cinema products is driven by the number of 3D cinema releases and the commercial success of those releases;

• Our 3D glasses could become subject to regulation in the U.S. and other countries in the future, which could restrict how our 3D glasses are manufactured, used, or marketed; and

• There has been increased public scrutiny of potential health risks relating to viewing 3D movies. If these potential health risks are substantiated, the popularity of 3D movies could decline. In addition, if health risks associated with our 3D products materialize, we may become subject to government regulation or product liability claims, including personal injury claims.

If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our ability to compete profitably in the 3D cinema market may be adversely affected.

Events and conditions in the cinema and broadcast industries may affect sales of our cinema products and other services.

Sales of our cinema products and services tend to fluctuate based on the underlying trends in the cinema industry. For example, when box office receipts for the cinema industry increase, we have typically seen a corresponding increase in sales of our cinema products, as cinema owners will be more likely to build new theaters and upgrade existing theaters with our more advanced products. Conversely, when box office receipts are down, cinema owners tend to scale back on plans to expand or upgrade their systems.

Our cinema product sales are also subject to fluctuations based on events and conditions in the cinema industry generally that may or may not be tied to box office receipts in particular time periods. For example, the growth in piracy of motion pictures adversely affects the construction of new screens, the renovation of existing theaters, and the continued production of new motion pictures.

Our services revenue, both in the U.S. and internationally, is tied to the number of movies being produced and distributed by studios and independent filmmakers. A number of factors can affect the number of movies that are produced, including strikes and work stoppages within the cinema industry, as well as tax incentive arrangements provided by many governments to promote local filmmaking. Services revenue is also impacted by the transition to digital cinema in some regions. For example, the 16% decrease in services revenue from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 was attributable primarily to a decrease in film-based production services revenue as the cinema industry transitions to digital cinema as well as decrease in virtual print fees, which were generated from certain leased digital cinema assets, as we discontinued this program in fiscal 2011.

The demand for our cinema products and services could decline as the cinema industry adopts digital cinema.

As cinema exhibitors have constructed new theaters or upgraded existing theaters, they have generally chosen digital cinema over traditional film cinema and we expect this trend to continue. Digital cinema, which is based on open standards, does not include our proprietary audio technologies. As the cinema industry continues to adopt digital cinema, the demand for our traditional film cinema products and services has declined significantly and we anticipate that the demand for film based products will decline in future periods. Furthermore, exhibitors adopting digital cinema can choose from multiple digital cinema playback servers and audio processors, many of which may not contain our technologies, and our competitive position in the digital cinema market is not as strong as our position in the traditional film cinema market. Decreases in demand for our

14

traditional film cinema products and services accompanied by decreases in revenue from digital cinema products and services would adversely affect our revenue stream from the cinema industry.

A decrease in demand for our cinema products and services could adversely affect our consumer products licensing business.

A decrease in the demand for our cinema products and services could adversely affect licensing of our consumer technologies, because the strength of our brand and our ability to use professional product developments to introduce new technologies, which can later be licensed to OEMs and service providers, would be impaired. If, in such circumstances, we are unable to adapt our products and services or introduce new products for the digital cinema market successfully, our business could be materially adversely affected.

We face risks relating to the online and mobile content delivery markets and declines in optical disc media.

For nearly 20 years, movies have been distributed, purchased, and consumed through optical disc media, such as DVD and more recently Blu-ray Disc. However, the growth of the Internet and home computer usage, connected televisions, set-top boxes, tablets, smartphones, and other devices accompanied by the rapid advancement of online and mobile content delivery has resulted in the recent trend to movie download and streaming services in various parts of the world. We expect a further shift away from optical disc media to online and mobile media content consumption, which will result in declines in revenue from DVD and Blu-ray Disc players. Such declines would adversely affect our licensing revenue.

In addition, online and mobile media content services that compete with or replace DVD and Blu-ray Disc players as dominant media for consumer video entertainment may choose not to encode their content with our proprietary technologies, which could affect OEM and software vendor demand for our decoding technologies. Furthermore, our participation in online media content playback may be less profitable for us than DVD and Blu-ray Disc players. The online and mobile markets are characterized by intense competition, evolving industry standards and business and distribution models, disruptive software and hardware technology developments, frequent new product and service introductions, short product and service life cycles, and price sensitivity on the part of consumers, all of which may result in downward pressure on pricing. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our operating results may fluctuate depending upon the timing of when we receive royalty reports from our licensees, royalty report adjustments, and the satisfaction of our revenue recognition criteria.

Our quarterly operating results fluctuate based on the risks set forth in this section, as well as on:

• The timing of when we receive royalty reports from our licensees and when we have met all revenue recognition criteria;

• Royalty reports including positive or negative corrective adjustments;

• Retroactive royalties that cover extended periods of time;

• The recognition of unusually large amounts of licensing revenue from licensees in any given quarter because not all of our revenue recognition criteria were met in prior periods; and

• The recognition of large amounts of products and services revenue in any given quarter because not all of our revenue recognition criteria were met in prior periods.

This can result in the recognition of a large amount of revenue in a given quarter that is not necessarily indicative of the amounts of revenue to be received in future quarters, thus causing fluctuations in our operating results.

Inaccurate licensee royalty reporting could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We generate licensing revenue primarily from OEMs and software vendors who license our technologies and incorporate those technologies in their products. Our license agreements generally obligate our licensees to pay us a specified royalty for every product they ship that incorporates our technologies, and we rely on our licensees to accurately report their shipments. However, we have difficulty independently determining whether or not our licensees are reporting shipments accurately, particularly with respect to software incorporating our technologies because unauthorized copies of such software can be made relatively easily. Most of our license agreements permit us to audit our licensees' records, but audits are generally expensive, time-consuming, and potentially detrimental to our ongoing business relationships with our licensees.

In the past, licensees, particularly in emerging economies, such as China, have understated or failed to report the number of products incorporating our technologies that they shipped, and we have not been able to collect and recognize revenue to which we were entitled. We expect that we will continue to experience understatement and non-reporting of royalties by our

15

licensees, which could adversely affect our operating results. Conversely, to the extent that our licensees overstate the number of products incorporating our technologies, or report the products under the wrong categories, corrections of prior reports could result in reductions of royalty revenue in subsequent periods, which could also adversely affect our operating results.

Third parties from whom we license technologies may challenge our calculation of the royalties we owe them for inclusion of their technologies in our products and licensed technologies, which could adversely affect our operating results, business, and prospects.

In some cases, the products we sell and the technologies we license to our customers include intellectual property that we have licensed from third parties. Our agreements with these third parties generally require us to pay them royalties for that use, and give the third parties the right to audit our calculation of those royalties. A third party may disagree with our interpretation of the terms of a license agreement or, as a result of an audit, a third party could challenge the accuracy of our calculation. We have in the past been, and may in the future be, involved in disputes with third-party technology licensors regarding license terms.

A successful challenge by a third party could result in the termination of a license agreement or increase the amount of royalties we have to pay to the third party, which would decrease our gross margin and adversely affect our operating results.

Unauthorized use of our intellectual property could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We have often experienced, and expect to continue to experience, problems with non-licensee OEMs and software vendors, particularly in emerging economies, such as China, incorporating our technologies and trademarks into their products without our authorization and without paying us any licensing fees. Manufacturers of integrated circuits, or ICs, containing our technologies occasionally sell these ICs to third parties who are not our system licensees. These sales, and the failure of such manufacturers to report the sales, facilitate the unauthorized use of our intellectual property. As emerging economies transition from analog to digital content, such as the transition from analog to digital broadcast, we expect to experience increased problems with this form of piracy, which would adversely affect our operating results.

We have limited experience in non-sound technology markets which could limit our future growth.

Our future growth will depend, in part, upon our expansion into areas beyond sound technologies. For example, in addition to our digital cinema and 3D digital cinema initiatives, we are exploring other areas that facilitate delivery of digital entertainment, such as video solutions for the consumer market. We will need to spend considerable resources in the future on research and development or acquisitions in order to deliver innovative non-sound products and technologies. However, we have limited experience in non-sound technology markets and, despite our efforts, non-sound products, technologies, and services we expect to develop or acquire and market may not achieve or sustain market acceptance, may not meet industry needs, and may not be accepted as industry standards. If we are unsuccessful in selling non-sound products, technologies, and services, the future growth of our business may be limited.

If our products and technologies are not adopted as industry standards, our business prospects could be limited and our operating results could be adversely affected.

The entertainment industry depends upon industry standards to ensure compatibility across delivery platforms and a wide variety of consumer entertainment products. Accordingly, we make significant efforts to design our products and technologies to address capability, quality, and cost considerations so that they either meet, or, more importantly, are adopted as, industry standards across the broad range of entertainment industry markets in which we participate, as well as the markets in which we hope to compete in the future. To have our products and technologies adopted as industry standards, we must convince a broad spectrum of standards-setting organizations throughout the world, as well as our major customers and licensees who are members of such organizations, to adopt them as such and to ensure that other industry standards are consistent with our products and technologies. If our technologies are not adopted or do not remain as industry standards, our business, operating results, and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Additionally, the market for broadcast technologies has traditionally been heavily based on industry standards, often set by governments or other standards-setting organizations, and we expect this to be the case in the future. If our technologies are not chosen as industry standards for broadcasting in particular geographic areas, this could adversely affect our ability to compete in these markets.

It may be more difficult for us, in the future, to have our technologies adopted as individual industry standards to the extent that entertainment industry participants collaborate on the development of industry standard technologies.

Standards-setting organizations are increasingly adopting or establishing technology standards for use in a wide range of consumer entertainment products. As a result, it is more difficult for individual companies to have their technologies adopted

16

wholesale as an informal industry standard. We call this type of standard a “de facto” industry standard, meaning that the industry has widely adopted the technology, although no industry standards-setting organization has explicitly mandated such standard. Increasingly there are multiple companies, including ones that typically compete against one another, involved in the development of new technologies for use in entertainment-oriented products. As a result, these companies often license their collective intellectual property rights as a group, making it more difficult for any single company to have its technologies adopted widely as a de facto industry standard or to have its technologies adopted as an exclusive, explicit industry standard for consumer entertainment products.

Even if our technologies are adopted as an explicit industry standard for a particular market, market participants may not widely adopt our technologies.

Even when a standards-setting organization mandates our technologies for a particular market, which we call an “explicit” industry standard, our technologies may not be the sole technologies adopted for that market as an explicit industry standard. Accordingly, our operating results depend upon participants in that market choosing to adopt our technologies instead of competitive technologies that also may be acceptable under such standard. For example, the continued growth of our revenue from the broadcast market will depend upon both the continued global adoption of digital television generally and the choice to use our technologies where it is one of several accepted industry standards.

Our licensing revenue depends to a significant extent on patent royalties, and some of our key patents from which a significant portion of that revenue is derived have expired and will continue to expire.

Many of the technologies that we license to our system licensees are covered by patents, and the licensing revenue that we receive from those licenses depends in large part upon the life of such patents. In general, our agreements with our licensees require them to pay us a full royalty with respect to a particular technology only until the last patent covering that technology expires in a particular country. As of September 28, 2012, we had nearly 2,800 individual issued patents, and over 2,700 pending patent applications, in over 80 jurisdictions throughout the world. The currently issued patents expire at various times through November 2032.

We regularly look for opportunities to expand our patent portfolio both through organic development and acquisitions. However, to the extent that we are not able to obtain new patents or develop other proprietary technologies, or to the extent that we do not replace licensing revenue from technologies covered by expiring patents with licensing revenue based on non-expiring patents and other proprietary technologies, our operating results may be materially adversely affected.

In particular, some of our patents relating to Dolby Digital technologies, from which we derive a significant part of our licensing revenue, have expired and others will expire over the next several years. We have transitioned a number of our Dolby Digital licensees, and continue to make progress in transitioning other Dolby Digital licensees, to Dolby Digital Plus technologies, an extension of our Dolby Digital technologies, whose patents generally expire later than the Dolby Digital patents. We now derive a significant part of our licensing revenue from Dolby Digital Plus. To the extent that we are unsuccessful in having licensees continue to transition to Dolby Digital Plus, or to the extent that licensees of Dolby Digital Plus transition back to Dolby Digital as our original patents covering this technology expire, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

The markets for our technologies are highly competitive, and if we are unable to compete successfully, our business will suffer.

The markets for entertainment industry technologies are highly competitive, and we face competitive threats and pricing pressure in our markets. Competitors for our licensed technologies include: Audyssey Laboratories, DTS, Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits, Microsoft, Monster Cable Products, Philips, RealNetworks, Sony, Technicolor, and Waves Audio. Competitors for our products include: Barco, Doremi, GDC, IMAX, MasterImage 3D, NEC, Panavision, QSC Audio Products, Qube Cinema, REALD, Rovi, Sony, Technicolor, USL, and XpanD. Competitors for our services include DTS and Sony. Consumers may perceive the quality of the audio experience produced by some of our competitors' technologies to be equivalent or superior to the audio experience produced by our technologies. Other companies may become competitors in one or more of these areas in the future.

Additionally, some of our current or future competitors may have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and other resources than we do, or may have more experience or advantages in the markets in which they compete, particularly in the market for online media content. These competitors may also be able to offer integrated system solutions in markets for sound or non-sound entertainment technologies on a royalty-free basis or at a lower price than our technologies, including audio, video, and rights management technologies related to PCs or the Internet, which could make competing technologies that we develop unnecessary.

17

Our business and prospects depend on the strength of our brand, and if we do not maintain and strengthen our brand, our business will be materially harmed.

Maintaining and strengthening the Dolby brand is critical to maintaining and expanding our licensing, products, and services business, as well as to our ability to enter new markets for our sound and other technologies. Our continued success depends, in part, on our reputation for providing high quality technologies, products, and services across a wide range of entertainment markets, including the CE, PC, broadcast, and gaming markets. If we fail to promote and maintain the Dolby brand successfully in licensing, products or services, our business and prospects will suffer. Furthermore, we believe that the strength of our brand may affect the likelihood that our technologies are adopted as industry standards in various markets and for various applications. Our ability to maintain and strengthen our brand will depend heavily on our ability to develop innovative technologies for the entertainment industry, to successfully enter into new markets, and to provide high quality products and services in these new markets, which we may not do successfully.

Our licensing of industry standard technologies can be subject to restrictions that could adversely affect our business and prospects.

When a standards-setting organization mandates our technologies as explicit industry standards, we generally must agree to license such technologies on a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory basis, which could limit our control over the use of these technologies. In these situations, we must often limit the royalty rates we charge for these technologies, which could adversely affect our revenue. Furthermore, we may be unable to limit to whom we license such technologies, and may be unable to restrict many terms of the license.

We have in the past, and may in the future, be subject to claims that our licensing of industry standard technologies may not conform to the requirements of the standards-setting organization. Allegations such as these could be asserted in private actions seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief, or in regulatory actions. Claimants in such cases could seek to restrict or change our licensing practices or our ability to license our technologies in ways that could injure our reputation and otherwise materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, and prospects.

We face risks in conducting business in China and other emerging economies.

We believe that various trends will increase our exposure to the risks of conducting business in emerging economies. For example, we expect the number of OEMs in emerging economies, such as China, to increase due to the availability of lower manufacturing costs as compared to those of other industrial countries and the continued industry shift by retailers towards lower end DVD and more recently Blu-ray Disc player and television offerings. We have seen OEMs shift product manufacturing to these lower cost manufacturing countries and expect more OEMs to do so in the future. We also believe that our sales of products and services in emerging economies will expand in the future to the extent that the use of digital surround sound technologies increases in these countries, including in movies and broadcast television, and as consumers there become more affluent. We face many risks associated with operating in these emerging economies, in large part due to limited recognition and enforcement of contractual and intellectual property rights. As a result, we may experience difficulties in enforcing our intellectual property rights in these emerging economies, where intellectual property rights are not as respected as they are in the U.S., Japan, and Europe. We believe that it is critical that we strengthen existing relationships and develop new relationships with entertainment industry participants worldwide to increase our ability to enforce our intellectual property and contractual rights without relying solely on the legal systems in the countries in which we operate. If we are unable to develop, maintain, and strengthen these relationships, our revenue from these countries could be adversely affected.

We have limited or no patent protection for some of our technologies in particular countries, including China, Taiwan, and India, which could limit our ability to grow our business in these markets.

In China and Taiwan we have only limited patent protection, especially with respect to our Dolby Digital technologies. In India, we have no issued patents for Dolby Digital technologies. Consequently, maintaining or growing our licensing revenue will depend on our ability to obtain patent rights in these countries for existing and new technologies, which is uncertain. Furthermore, because of the limitations of the legal systems in many countries, the effectiveness of patents obtained or that may in the future be obtained, if any, is likewise uncertain.

Our licensing revenue depends in large part upon semiconductor manufacturers incorporating our technologies into integrated circuits.

Our licensing revenue from system licensees depends in large part upon the availability of ICs that implement our technologies. IC manufacturers incorporate our technologies into these ICs, which are then incorporated in consumer entertainment products. We do not manufacture these ICs, but rather depend on IC manufacturers to develop, produce, and then sell them to system licensees. We do not control the IC manufacturers' decisions whether or not to incorporate our technologies

18

into their ICs, and we do not control their product development or commercialization efforts nor predict their success. As a result, if these IC manufacturers are unable or unwilling, for any reason, to implement our technologies into their ICs, or if, for any reason, they sell fewer ICs incorporating our technologies, our operating results will be adversely affected.

Pricing pressures on the system licensees who incorporate our technologies into their products could limit the licensing fees we charge for our technologies, which could adversely affect our revenue.

The markets for the consumer entertainment products in which our technologies are incorporated are intensely competitive and price sensitive. We expect to face increased royalty pricing pressure for our technologies as we seek to drive the adoption of our technologies into online content and portable devices, such as tablets and smartphones. Retail prices for consumer entertainment products that include our sound technologies, such as DVD players and home theater systems, have decreased significantly, and we expect prices to decrease for the foreseeable future. In response, OEMs have sought to reduce their product costs, which can result in downward pressure on the licensing fees we charge our customers who incorporate our technologies into the consumer entertainment products that they sell. Furthermore, while we have contractual rights with many of our licensees for cost of living adjustments to our royalty rights, we may not be able to negotiate those terms in our contracts with existing and new licensees. Additionally, downward cost of living adjustments would result in declines in the licensing fees that we charge. A decline in, or the modification or loss of the contractual right to increase, the licensing fees we charge could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

We have in the past, and may in the future be, subject to legal claims related to our intellectual property rights, which are costly to defend, could require us to pay damages, and could limit our ability to use particular technologies in the future.

Companies in the technology and entertainment industries own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We have faced such claims in the past and we expect to face similar claims in the future.

Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, expensive to litigate or settle, and could divert management resources and attention. In the past we have settled claims relating to infringement allegations and agreed to make payments in connection with such settlements. We expect that similar claims will be asserted against us in the future in the ordinary course of our business. An adverse determination in any intellectual property claim could require that we pay damages or stop using technologies found to be in violation of a third party's rights and could prevent us from offering our products and services to others. In order to avoid these restrictions, we may have to seek a license for the technology, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. Any license could also require us to pay significant royalties, and may significantly increase our operating expenses. As a result, we may be required to develop alternative non-infringing technologies, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technologies for any aspects of our business found to be infringing, we may be forced to limit our product and service offerings and may be unable to compete effectively.

In some instances, we have contractually agreed to provide indemnifications to licensees relating to our intellectual property. Additionally, at times in the past, we have chosen to defend our licensees from third-party intellectual property infringement claims even where such defense was not contractually required, and we may choose to take on such defense in the future. Any of these results could harm our brand, our operating results, and our financial condition.

We have in the past and may in the future have disputes with our licensees regarding our licensing arrangements.

At times, we are engaged in disputes regarding the licensing of our intellectual property rights, including matters related to our royalty rates and other terms of our licensing arrangements. These types of disputes can be asserted by our customers or prospective customers or by other third parties as part of negotiations with us or in private actions seeking monetary damages or injunctive relief, or in regulatory actions. In the past, licensees have threatened to initiate litigation against us regarding our licensing royalty rate practices including our adherence to licensing on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms and potential antitrust claims. Damages and requests for injunctive relief asserted in claims like these could be material, and could be disruptive to our business. Any disputes with our customers or potential customers or other third parties could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and prospects.

We face risks relating to the transition to digital cinema.

We face a number of risks relating to the transition to digital cinema, including:

• Exhibitors may perceive competing products to be potentially advantageous to our products or they may choose lower priced competing products or competing products with different features, such as support for high frame rate content or 4K presentation;

19

• At least one of our competitors has a significantly greater installed base of its digital cinema servers than we do which has and likely will continue to limit our share of the digital cinema market, particularly in the U.S. market;

• Pricing and other competitive pressures have caused us to implement pricing strategies which have had an adverse effect on our products gross margins;

• As the industry transition to digital cinema becomes substantially complete, the demand for new digital cinema screens will drop significantly and the industry will enter into a replacement cycle.

These and other risks related to digital cinema could limit our future prospects in digital cinema and could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

Acquisition activities could result in operating difficulties and other harmful consequences.

We have evaluated, and expect to continue to evaluate, a wide array of possible strategic transactions, including acquisitions. We consider these types of transactions in connection with our efforts to expand our business beyond sound technologies. Although we cannot predict whether or not we will complete any such acquisition or other transactions in the future, any of these transactions could be material in relation to our market capitalization, financial condition, or results of operations. The process of integrating an acquired company, business, or technology may create unforeseen difficulties and expenditures. Foreign acquisitions involve unique risks in addition to those mentioned above, including those related to integration of operations across different geographies, cultures, and languages, currency risks, and risks associated with the particular economic, political, and regulatory environment in specific countries. Also, the anticipated benefit of our acquisitions may not materialize.

We face various risks in integrating acquired businesses, including:

• Diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to acquisition integration challenges;

• Cultural and logistical challenges associated with integrating employees from acquired businesses into our organization;

• Retaining employees, suppliers and customers from businesses we acquire;

• The need to implement or improve internal controls, procedures and policies appropriate for a public company at businesses that prior to the acquisition may have lacked effective controls, procedures and policies;

• Possible write-offs or impairment charges resulting from acquisitions;

• Unanticipated or unknown liabilities relating to acquired businesses; and

• The need to integrate acquired businesses’ accounting, management information, manufacturing, human resources, and other administrative systems to permit effective management.

Furthermore, acquisitions may have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations, including a potential adverse impact on our gross margins.

Future acquisitions could result in dilutive equity issuances or the need to obtain equity or debt financing on unfavorable terms.

Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, amortization expenses, and write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our operating results or financial condition. Future acquisitions may also require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

We are dependent upon our relationships within the entertainment industry, and the failure to maintain such relationships could materially harm our business.

If we fail to maintain and expand our relationships with a broad range of entertainment industry participants, including film studios, broadcasters, video game designers, music producers, mobile media content producers, and OEMs, our business and prospects could be materially harmed. Relationships have historically played an important role in the entertainment markets that we serve. For example, sales of our products and services are particularly dependent upon our relationships with the major film studios and broadcasters, and licensing of our technologies is particularly dependent upon our relationships with system licensees, software vendors, and IC manufacturers. If we fail to maintain and strengthen these relationships, these entertainment industry participants may be less likely to purchase and use our technologies, products, and services, or create content incorporating our technologies, which could materially harm our business and prospects. Additionally, if major

20

entertainment industry participants form strategic relationships that exclude us, whether in licensing, products, or services, our business and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

We face diverse risks in our international business, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We are dependent on international sales for a substantial amount of our total revenue. For fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, revenue from outside the U.S. was 68%, 68%, and 66% of our total revenue, respectively. We expect that international and export sales will continue to represent a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. This future revenue will depend to a large extent on the continued use and expansion of our technologies in entertainment industries worldwide.

Due to our reliance on sales to customers outside the U.S., we are subject to the risks of conducting business internationally, including:

• Our ability to enforce our contractual and intellectual property rights, especially in those foreign countries that do not recognize and enforce intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the U.S., Japan, and European countries, which increases the risk of unauthorized and uncompensated use of our technologies;

• U.S. and foreign government trade restrictions, including those which may impose restrictions on importation of programming, technology, or components to or from the U.S.;

• Our ability to comply with applicable international laws and regulations governing our business and operations, including local consumer and safety laws, as well as license requirements;

• Foreign government taxes, regulations, and permit requirements, including foreign taxes that we may not be able to offset against taxes imposed upon us in the U.S., and other laws limiting our ability to repatriate funds to the U.S.;

• Burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws;

• Changes in diplomatic and trade relationships;

• Difficulty in establishing, staffing, and managing foreign operations;

• Adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, including risks related to any interest rate swap or other hedging activities we undertake;

• Political or social instability, natural disasters, war or events of terrorism; and

• The strength of international economies.

Some of our business partners also have international operations and are subject to the risks described above. Even if we are able to successfully manage the risks of conducting business internationally, our business may be adversely affected if our business partners are not able to successfully manage these risks.

In many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, it is common to engage in business practices that are prohibited by U.S. regulations applicable to us such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and U.S. export controls. Although we implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and U.S. export controls, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, distributors, dealers, and agents will not take actions in violation of our policies or these regulations. Any such violation could have an adverse effect on our business.

We face risks associated with complying with international employment laws.

A significant number of our employees are located outside the U.S. This means that we have exposure to changes in foreign laws governing our relationships with our employees, which could have a direct impact on our operating costs. Expansion into international markets has required, and will require, significant management attention and resources. We incur additional legal compliance costs associated with our international operations and could become subject to legal penalties in foreign countries if we do not comply with local employment laws and regulations, which may be substantially different from those in the U.S.

Revisions to patent laws and regulations in the U.S. and abroad may adversely impact our ability to obtain, license, and enforce our patent rights.

Our licensing business depends in part on the uniform and consistent treatment of patent rights in the U.S. and abroad. Changes to the patent laws and regulations in the U.S. and abroad may limit our ability to obtain, license, and enforce our rights. Additionally, court and administrative rulings may interpret existing patent laws and regulations in ways that adversely affect our ability to obtain, license, and enforce our patents. For example, recent rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court concerning injunctions may make it more difficult, under some circumstances, for us to obtain injunctive relief against a party that has been

21

found to infringe one or more of our patents, and rulings regarding patent challenges by licensees could potentially make it easier for our licensees to challenge our patents even though they have already agreed to take a license.

Our stock repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time, which may result in a decrease in our stock price.

Our stock repurchase program, whereby we may continue to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock, may reduce the public float of shares available for trading on a daily basis. Such purchases may be limited, suspended, or terminated at any time without prior notice. There can be no assurance that we will buy additional shares of our Class A common stock under our stock repurchase program or that any future repurchases will have a positive impact on our stock price or earnings per share. Important factors that could cause us to discontinue or decrease our share repurchases include, among others, unfavorable market conditions, the market price of our Class A common stock, the nature of other investment or strategic opportunities presented to us from time to time, the rate of dilution of our equity compensation programs, our ability to make appropriate, timely, and beneficial decisions as to when, how, and whether to purchase shares under the stock repurchase program, and the availability of funds necessary to continue purchasing stock. If we curtail our repurchase program, our stock price may be negatively affected.

Fluctuations in our operating results and other factors may contribute to the volatility of the market price of our stock.

A number of factors, many of which are outside our control, may cause or contribute to significant fluctuations in our quarterly and annual revenue and operating results. These fluctuations may make financial planning and forecasting more difficult. In addition, these fluctuations may result in unanticipated decreases in our available cash, which could negatively impact our business and prospects, and could increase the volatility of our stock price. Factors that may cause or contribute to fluctuations in our operating results and revenue or the volatility of the market price of our stock include those risks set forth in this section as well as the following:

• Fluctuations in demand for our products and for the digital entertainment products of our licensees;

• Adverse developments in general economic conditions;

• The amount and timing of our operating costs, capital expenditures, and related charges, including those related to the expansion or consolidation of our business, operations, and infrastructure;

• Changes in business cycles that affect the markets in which we sell our products and services or the markets for consumer entertainment products incorporating our technologies;

• Fluctuations in the timing of royalty reports we receive from our licensees, including late or sporadic reports;

• Variations in the time-to-market of our technologies in the entertainment industry markets in which we operate;

• Corrections to licensees' reports received in periods subsequent to those in which the original revenue was reported;

• The announcement, introduction, or enhancement of technologies, products, and services, by us, our licensees, and our competitors, and market acceptance of these new or enhanced technologies, products, and services;

• Rapid, wholesale changes in technology in the entertainment industries in which we compete;

• Events and conditions in the cinema industry, including box office receipts that affect the number of theaters constructed, the number of movies produced and exhibited, the general popularity of motion pictures, and strikes by cinema industry participants;

• The financial resources of cinema exhibitors available to buy our products or to equip their theaters to accommodate upgraded or new technologies;

• Consolidation by participants in the markets in which we compete, which could result among other things in pricing pressure;

• Seasonal electronics product shipment patterns by our system licensees, particularly in our first fiscal quarter, which generally result in revenue in our second fiscal quarter;

• The impact of, and our ability to react to, interruptions in the entertainment distribution process, including as a result of work stoppages at our facilities, our customers' facilities, and other points throughout the entertainment distribution process;

• Adverse outcomes of litigation or governmental proceedings, including any foreign, federal, state, or local tax assessments or audits;

22

• Repurchases we make of our common stock;

• Costs of litigation and intellectual property protection;

• Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and other currencies;

• Variations between our operating results and published analysts' expectations; and

• Announcements by our competitors or significant customers.

One or more of the foregoing or other factors may cause our operating expenses to be disproportionately higher or lower or may cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate significantly in any particular quarterly or annual period. Consequently, results from prior periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of future periods.

Changes in tax rates and exposure for additional income tax liabilities or adverse outcomes resulting from examinations of our tax returns could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, the geographic mix of our revenue, or by changes in tax laws or their interpretation could all favorably or unfavorably affect our future effective tax rates. We file income tax returns in the U.S. and in several U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions, and must use judgment in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. For example, the following could adversely affect our income taxes:

• Earnings being lower than anticipated in countries that have lower tax rates and higher than anticipated in countries that have higher tax rates;

• Changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;

• Expiration of or lapses in the R&D tax credit laws;

• Fluctuations in tax exempt interest income;

• Transfer pricing adjustments;

• Tax effects of nondeductible compensation;

• Tax costs related to intercompany realignments;

• Changes in accounting principles; or

• Changes in tax laws and regulations, including possible U.S. changes to the taxation of earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, the deductibility of expenses attributable to foreign income, or the foreign tax credit rules.

We are subject to the periodic examination of our income tax returns by tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance, however, that the outcomes from these continuous examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Additionally, due to the evolving nature of tax rules combined with the large number of jurisdictions in which we operate, it is possible that estimates of our tax liability and the likelihood that the benefit of our deferred tax assets will be realized could change in the future, which may result in additional tax liabilities and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

If securities or industry analysts publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or if our operating results do not meet or exceed their projections, our stock price could decline.

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us or our industry downgrade our stock or the stock of other companies in our industry, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or industry, or if our operating results do not meet or exceed their projections, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

Any inability to protect our intellectual property rights could reduce the value of our products, services, and brand.

Our business is dependent upon protecting our patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights. Licensing revenue represented 86%, 83%, and 77% of our total revenue in the fiscal years 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Effective intellectual property rights protection, however, may not be available under the laws of every country in which our products and services and those of our licensees are distributed. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could

23

harm our business or our ability to compete.

In addition, protecting our intellectual property rights is costly and time consuming. We have taken steps in the past to enforce our intellectual property rights and expect to do so in the future. However, it may not be practicable or cost effective for us to enforce our intellectual property rights fully, particularly in some countries or where the initiation of a claim might harm our business relationships. If we are unable to successfully identify and stop unauthorized use of our intellectual property, we could experience increased operational and enforcement costs, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We generally seek patent protection for our innovations. However, it is possible that some of these innovations may not be protectable, or we may choose not to protect particular innovations that later turn out to be important, due to the high costs of obtaining patent protection. Even where we do have patent protection, the scope of such protection may be insufficient to prevent third parties from designing around our particular patent claims. Furthermore, there is always the possibility that an issued patent may later be found to be invalid or unenforceable. We also seek to maintain select intellectual property as trade secrets. Third parties or our employees could intentionally or accidentally compromise the intellectual property that we maintain as trade secrets, which would cause us to lose the competitive advantage resulting from them.

Our customers who are also our current or potential competitors may choose to use their own or competing technologies rather than ours.

We face competitive risks in situations where our customers are also current or potential competitors. For example, Sony and Microsoft are significant licensee customers and Sony is a significant purchaser of our broadcast products and services, but Sony and Microsoft are also competitors with respect to some of our consumer, broadcast, and cinema technologies. To the extent that our customers choose to use competing technologies they have developed or in which they have an interest, rather than use our technologies, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

We face competition from other audio formats.

We believe that the success we have had licensing our surround sound technologies to system licensees is due, in part, to the strength of our brand and the perception that our technologies provide a high quality solution for surround sound. However, both free and proprietary sound technologies are becoming increasingly prevalent, and we expect competitors to continue to enter this field with other solutions. Furthermore, to the extent that customers perceive our competitors’ solutions to provide the same advantages as our technologies at a lower or comparable price, there is a risk that these customers may treat sound encoding technologies such as ours as commodities, resulting in loss of status of our technologies, decline in their use, and significant pricing pressure. The commoditization of our audio technologies, as opposed to treatment as a premium solution, could adversely affect our business, operating results, and prospects.

The loss of or delay in operations of one or more of our key suppliers could materially delay or stop the production of our products and impair our ability to generate revenue.

Our reliance on outside suppliers for some of the key materials and components we use in manufacturing our products involves risks, including limited control over the price, timely delivery, and quality of such components. We have no formal agreements in place with our suppliers for the continued supply of materials and components. Although we have identified alternate suppliers for most of our key materials and components, any required changes in our suppliers could cause material delays in our production operations and increase our production costs. In addition, at times our suppliers have not been, and in the future may not be, able to meet our production demands as to volume, quality, or timeliness.

Moreover, we rely on sole source suppliers for some of the components that we use to manufacture our products, including specific charged coupled devices, light emitting diodes, and digital signal processors. These sole source suppliers may become unable or unwilling to deliver these components to us at an acceptable cost or at all, which could force us to redesign those specific products.

Our inability to obtain timely delivery of key components of acceptable quality, any significant increases in the prices of components, or the redesign of our products could result in material production delays, increased costs, and reductions in shipments of our products, any of which could increase our operating costs, harm our customer relationships, or materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

Revenue from our products may suffer if our production processes encounter problems or if we are not able to match our production capacity to fluctuating levels of demand.

Our products are highly complex and production difficulties or inefficiencies can interrupt production, resulting in our inability to deliver products on time in a cost effective manner, which could harm our competitive position. We have a single

24

production facility and increasingly use contract manufacturers for a significant portion of our production capacity. Our reliance on contract manufacturers for the manufacture of our products involves risks, including limited control over timely delivery and quality of such products. If production of our products is interrupted, we may not be able to manufacture products on a timely basis. A shortage of manufacturing capacity for our products could adversely affect our operating results and damage our customer relationships. We are unable to quickly adapt our manufacturing capacity to rapidly changing market conditions and a contract manufacturer may encounter similar difficulties. Likewise, we may be unable to quickly respond to fluctuations in customer demand or contract manufacturer interruptions. At times we underutilize our manufacturing facilities as a result of reduced demand for some of our products. Any inability to effectively respond to fluctuations in customer demand for our products or contract manufacturer interruptions may adversely affect our gross margins.

Our products, from time to time, experience quality problems that can result in decreased sales and higher operating expenses.

Our products are complex and sometimes contain undetected software or hardware errors, particularly when first introduced or when new versions are released. In addition, to the extent that we engage contract manufacturers, we do not have as much control over manufacturing which could result in quality problems. Furthermore, our products are sometimes combined with or incorporated into products from other vendors, sometimes making it difficult to identify the source of a problem. These errors could result in a loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products or cause delays in delivering them and meeting customer demands, any of which could reduce our revenue and raise significant customer relations issues. In addition, if our products contain errors we could be required to replace or reengineer them, which would increase our costs. Moreover, if any such errors cause unintended consequences, we could incur substantial costs in defending and settling product liability claims. Although we generally attempt to contractually limit liability for defective products to the cost of repairing or replacing these products, if these contract provisions are not enforced, or are unenforceable for any reason, or if liabilities arise that are not effectively limited, we could incur substantial costs in defending and settling product liability claims.

Licensee products that incorporate our technologies, from time to time, experience quality problems that could damage our brand, decrease revenue, and increase operating expenses.

Newly introduced and new versions of licensee products that incorporate our technologies are complex and may contain undetected software or hardware errors. In addition, the combination or incorporation of these newly introduced products with products from other companies can make it difficult to identify the source of a problem. Any negative publicity or negative impact relating to these product problems could adversely affect the perception of our brand. In addition, these errors could result in loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of those products or Dolby technologies, or cause delays in delivering them and meeting customer demands, any of which could reduce our revenue and raise significant customer relations issues. Although we generally attempt to contractually limit our liability for our licensees' defective products, we may elect to help reengineer those products, which could adversely affect our operating results.

A loss of one or more of our key customers or licensees in any of our markets could adversely affect our operating results.

From time to time, one or a small number of our customers or licensees may represent a significant percentage of our products, services, or licensing revenue. For example, revenue from our largest customer represented approximately 14% of total revenue for fiscal 2012. Although we have agreements with many of these customers, these agreements typically do not require any minimum purchases or minimum royalty fees and do not prohibit customers from purchasing products and services from competitors. A decision by any of our major customers or licensees not to use our technologies, or their failure or inability to pay amounts owed to us in a timely manner, or at all, whether due to strategic redirections or adverse changes in their businesses or for other reasons, could have a significant adverse effect on our operating results.

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs upon us and may adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Some of our operations use substances regulated under various federal, state, local, and international laws governing the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management, disposal, and labeling of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We could incur costs, fines, and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims, or could be required to incur substantial investigation or remediation costs, if we were to violate or become liable under environmental laws. Liability under environmental laws can be joint and several and without regard to comparative fault. The ultimate costs under environmental laws and the timing of these costs are difficult to predict.

25

New environmental laws and regulations could impact our operating results.

We expect that new environmental laws and regulations, introduced on an ongoing basis, will have the potential to affect our manufacturing and licensing operations. Although we cannot predict the ultimate impact of any such new laws and regulations, they will likely result in additional costs or decreased revenue, and could require that we redesign or change how we manufacture our products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We could incur substantial costs due to regulations regarding the composition of our products, which may adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We face increasing complexity in our product design as we adjust to new and future requirements relating to the materials composition of our products. For example, we redesigned our products to comply with restrictions on lead and other hazardous substances so we could continue to offer them for sale within the European Union. For some products, substituting particular components containing regulated hazardous substances is more difficult or costly, and additional redesign efforts could result in production delays. Selected electronic products that we maintain in inventory may be rendered obsolete if not in compliance with the new environmental laws, which could negatively impact our ability to generate revenue from those products.

Continued global credit market weakness could negatively impact the value and liquidity of our investment portfolio.

We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types, and maturities, including money market funds, U.S. treasury and agency securities, municipal debt securities, corporate bonds, and commercial paper. Although we follow an established investment policy and seek to minimize the credit risk associated with investments, these investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, and interest rate risks. Any downgrades, losses, or other significant deterioration in the fair value of our cash, cash equivalents, or investments could negatively impact our investments or our ability to meet our investment objectives. Such negative impact, should it arise, could require an impairment charge, which would adversely impact our financial results.

We face risks associated with international trade and currency exchange.

We maintain sales, marketing, and business operations in foreign countries. Consequently, we are exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates associated with the local currencies of our foreign business operations. While we derive nearly all of our revenue from transactions denominated in U.S. dollars, nearly all of our costs from our foreign operations are denominated in the currency of that foreign location. Consequently, exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could have a material impact on our profitability.

We rely on distributors that we do not control.

We rely significantly on a global network of independent, regional distributors to market and distribute our cinema and broadcast products. Our distributor arrangements are non-exclusive and our distributors are not obligated to buy our products and can represent competing products. The loss of a major distributor or the inability or unwillingness of our distributors to dedicate the resources necessary to promote our portfolio of products could adversely affect our revenue. Furthermore, our distributors could retain product channel inventory levels that exceed future anticipated sales, which could adversely affect future sales to those distributors. In addition, failures of our distributors to adhere to our policies or other ethical practices could adversely affect us. For example, while we have implemented policies designed to promote compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, export controls, and local laws, we do not have direct control over the business and risk management policies adopted by our distributors, and they could act contrary to our policies.

For the foreseeable future, Ray Dolby or his affiliates or family members will be able to control the selection of all members of our Board of Directors, as well as virtually every other matter that requires stockholder approval, which will severely limit the ability of other stockholders to influence corporate matters.

At September 28, 2012, Ray Dolby and his affiliates, including his family members, owned 7,077 shares of our Class A common stock and 56,450,740 shares of our Class B common stock. As of September 28, 2012, Ray Dolby and his affiliates, including his family members, had voting power of approximately 99.7% of our outstanding Class B common stock, which in the aggregate represented approximately 92.2% of the combined voting power of our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. Under our certificate of incorporation, holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share while holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Generally, shares of Class B common stock automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock upon transfer of such Class B common stock, other than transfers to certain specified persons and entities, including the spouse and descendants of Ray Dolby and the spouses and domestic partners of such descendants.

Because of this dual class structure, Ray Dolby, his affiliates, and his family members and descendants will, for the foreseeable future, have significant influence over our management and affairs, and will be able to control virtually all matters

26

requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions such as mergers or other sales of our company or assets, even if they come to own considerably less than 50% of the total number of outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock. Ray Dolby, his affiliates, his family members, and descendants will maintain this control even if in the future they come to own considerably less than 50% of the total number of outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock.

Moreover, these persons may take actions in their own interests that our stockholders do not view as beneficial. Absent a transfer of Class B common stock that would trigger an automatic conversion as described above, there is no threshold or time deadline at which the shares of Class B common stock will automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock.

Assuming conversion of all shares of Class B common stock held by persons not affiliated with Ray Dolby into shares of Class A common stock, so long as Ray Dolby and his affiliates, his family members, and descendants continue to hold shares of Class B common stock representing approximately 10% or more of the total number of outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock, they will hold a majority of the combined voting power of the Class A and Class B common stock.

Future sales of shares by insiders could cause our stock price to decline.

If our founder, officers, directors or employees sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in the public market, including shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Class B common stock, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline. As previously announced, (i) Ray and Dagmar Dolby, as Trustees of the Ray Dolby Trust under the Dolby Family Trust Instrument dated May 7, 1999, (ii) Ray and Dagmar Dolby, as Trustees of the Ray Dolby 2002 Trust A dated April 19, 2002, (iii) Ray and Dagmar Dolby, as Trustees of the Ray Dolby 2002 Trust B dated April 19, 2002, (iv) Ray and Dagmar Dolby, as Trustees of the Ray Dolby 2011 Trust A dated December 14, 2011, and (v) Ray and Dagmar Dolby, as Trustees of the Ray Dolby 2011 Trust B dated December 14, 2011, adopted Rule 10b5-1 trading plans in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 to sell up to 5.9 million shares of the Company's Class A common stock (or approximately 10.3% of Ray Dolby's direct and indirect holdings at the time). The trading plans were adopted during an “open window” in accordance with guidelines specified by Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as permitted by the Company's insider trading policy. Sales under the trading plans commenced in August 2012, are based upon pre-established stock price thresholds, are subject to daily volume limits and will expire once all of the shares have been sold or in August 2013, whichever is earlier.

We cannot predict the effect the trading plan sales may have on the future trading prices of our Class A common stock. As of September 28, 2012, we had a total of 103,095,464 shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding.

As of September 28, 2012, our directors and executive officers beneficially held 56,460,740 shares of Class B common stock, 151,208 shares of Class A common stock, vested options to purchase 20,000 shares of Class B common stock and vested options to purchase 349,330 shares of Class A common stock. We expect that any sale of our Class A common stock by our directors and executive officers would be subject to compliance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

27

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Facilities

Our principal corporate office, which we lease from the Dolby Family Trust, is located at 100 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California. This office provides approximately 70,000 square feet of space. The lease for this office expires on December 31, 2013, but we have options to renew the lease for two additional five-year terms.

Dolby Wootton Bassett, LLC, of which Ray and Dagmar Dolby as Trustees of the Dolby Family Trust are collectively the sole member, the Ray Dolby Trust, or the Dolby Family Trust own a majority financial interest in real estate entities that own and lease to us certain of our other facilities in California and the United Kingdom. We own the remaining financial interests in these real estate entities. We lease from these real estate entities approximately 122,000 square feet of space at 999 Brannan Street, San Francisco, California for our principal administrative offices, approximately 45,000 square feet of space in Brisbane, California for manufacturing facilities and approximately 19,000 square feet of space in Burbank, California for research and development, sales, services, and administrative facilities. In addition, we lease from these real estate entities approximately 75,000 square feet of space in Wootton Bassett, England, which was used for manufacturing, sales, services and administrative facilities. In fiscal 2009, we consolidated our Wootton Bassett, U.K. manufacturing operations into our Brisbane, California facility to improve efficiencies. We continue to use the Wootton Bassett facilities for sales and services. The leases for these facilities expire at various times through 2015.

In June 2012, we purchased an approximately 354,000 square-foot building in San Francisco for approximately $109.8 million. After preparing the building for our use, we intend to use the space as our new worldwide headquarters.

We also lease additional research and development, sales, product testing, and administrative facilities from third parties in California, New York, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and internationally, including in Asia, Europe, Australia, Canada, and Brazil.

We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet our needs for the near future and that suitable additional or alternative space will be available on commercially reasonable terms to accommodate our foreseeable future operations.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various legal proceedings from time to time arising from the normal course of business activities, including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights, commercial, employment, and other matters. In our opinion, resolution of these pending matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our operating results or financial condition. Given the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could materially affect our future operating results or financial condition in a particular period; however, based on the information known by us as of the date of this filing and the rules and regulations applicable to the preparation of our financial statements, any such amount is either immaterial or it is not possible to provide an estimated amount of any such potential loss.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

28

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “DLB.” The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices on the NYSE of the Class A common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the NYSE. Such quotations represent inter dealer prices without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

	Fiscal 2012				Fiscal 2011
	High		Low		High		Low
First Quarter	$	33.12	$	26.28	$	69.69	$	56.69
Second Quarter	39.54		30.68		68.88		46.80
Third Quarter	45.11		36.33		51.59		41.44
Fourth Quarter	42.69		30.67		45.36		27.36

Our Class B common stock is neither listed nor publicly traded.

As of November 2, 2012, there were approximately 16 holders of record of our Class A common stock and 47 holders of record of our Class B common stock. The number of beneficial stockholders is substantially greater than the number of holders of record because a large portion of our common stock is held through brokerage firms.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared nor paid any cash dividend on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings and do not currently plan to pay any dividends in the immediate future. The payment of future dividends on the common stock and the rate of such dividends, if any and when not restricted, will be determined by our Board of Directors in light of our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, and any other relevant factors.

Sales of Unregistered Securities

In the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 11,400 shares of our Class B common stock to certain employees, officers, and directors upon the exercise of options awarded under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan; from September 29, 2012 through November 2, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 1,000 shares of our Class B common stock to certain employees and officers upon the exercise of options awarded under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. We received aggregate proceeds of $0.1 million in the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2012 and less than $0.1 million in the period from September 29, 2012 through November 2, 2012 as a result of the exercise of these options. We believe these transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in reliance on Rule 701 thereunder as transactions pursuant to compensatory benefit plans and contracts relating to compensation as provided under Rule 701. As of November 2, 2012 options to purchase an aggregate of 182,874 shares of our Class B common stock remain outstanding. All issuances of shares of our Class B common stock pursuant to the exercise of these options will be made in reliance on Rule 701. All option grants made under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan were made prior to the effectiveness of our initial public offering. No further option grants will be made under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

None of the foregoing transactions involved any underwriters, underwriting discounts, or commissions, or any public offering.

Each share of our Class B common stock is convertible into one share of our Class A common stock at any time, at the option of the holder or upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B common stock. In addition, each share of Class B common stock shall convert automatically into one share of Class A common stock upon any transfer, except for certain transfers described in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

29

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table provides information regarding our purchases of our Class A Common stock, $0.001 par value per share, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012:

	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share (1)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (3)
June 30, 2012 - July 27, 2012	751,553	$	37.78	751,553	$248.1 million
July 28, 2012 - August 24, 2012	764,978	34.24		764,978	$221.9 million
August 25, 2012 - September 28, 2012	688,902	34.28		688,902	$198.3 million
Total	2,205,433			2,205,433

(1) Excludes commission costs.

(2) Shares of Class A common stock were purchased under a $250.0 million stock repurchase program announced on November 3, 2009, which was subsequently increased by $300.0 million, $250.0 million, and $100.0 million announced on July 27, 2010, August 4, 2011, and February 8, 2012, respectively. The stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Stock repurchases under this program may be made through open market transactions, negotiated purchases, or otherwise, at times and in such amounts as we consider appropriate.

(3) Amounts shown in this column reflect amounts remaining under the stock repurchase program.

Stock Price Performance Graph

The following graph compares the total return of our Class A common stock with the total return for the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index (the “NYSE Composite”) and the Russell 3000 Index (the “Russell 3000”) for the five fiscal years ended September 28, 2012. The figures represented below assume an investment of $100 in our Class A common stock at the closing price of $34.82 on September 28, 2007, and in the NYSE Composite and the Russell 3000 on the same date and the reinvestment of dividends into shares of common stock. The comparisons in the table are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our Class A common stock. This graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

30

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this filing. The consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets data for the fiscal years ended September 28, 2012, September 30, 2011, and September 24, 2010 were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report. The consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets data for the fiscal years ended September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008 were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of financial results to be achieved in future periods. Fiscal 2011 consisted of 53 weeks, while all other fiscal years presented consisted of 52 weeks.

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010		September 25, 2009		September 26, 2008
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operations:
Revenue	$	926,264	$	955,505	$	922,713	$	719,503	$	640,231
Gross margin (1)	834,237		844,334		790,898		654,735		572,454
Operating expenses (2)	472,245		414,601		361,517		291,069		285,671
Income before provision for income taxes	368,991		440,643		437,012		371,419		301,802
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	264,302		309,267		283,447		242,991		199,458
Net income per share:
Basic	$	2.47	$	2.78	$	2.50	$	2.15	$	1.79
Diluted	$	2.46	$	2.75	$	2.46	$	2.11	$	1.74
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic	106,926		111,444		113,452		113,101		111,492
Diluted	107,541		112,554		115,388		115,367		114,781
Stock-based compensation included above was as follows:
(1) Cost of sales	$	914	$	824	$	553	$	679	$	1,030
(2) Operating expenses	46,667		42,841		28,262		21,743		21,680

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010		September 25, 2009		September 26, 2008
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	492,600	$	551,512	$	545,861	$	451,678	$	394,761
Working capital	813,446		999,213		894,657		744,254		491,196
Short-term and long-term investments	664,307		664,078		493,106		489,746		300,663
Total assets	1,960,798		1,884,387		1,711,772		1,581,315		1,336,146
Long-term debt	—		—		—		5,825		7,782
Total stockholders’ equity—Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	1,720,269		1,663,513		1,473,737		1,341,108		1,049,253

31

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ substantially from those referred to herein due to a number of factors, including but not limited to risks described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We disclaim any duty to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform our prior statements to actual results.

Overview

Dolby Laboratories has been a leading solutions provider to the entertainment industry for more than 45 years. We provide products, services, and technologies to capture, distribute, and play back entertainment content that gives consumers a premium entertainment experience, regardless of how or where they choose to enjoy it. Our core strengths range from our expertise in digital signal processing and compression technology to our long history of providing products, tools, and technologies to participants in the entertainment industry at each stage in the content creation, distribution, and playback process. We provide products and services that enable content creators and distributors to produce, encode, and transmit content with our premium audio technologies, and we license decoding technologies to the manufacturers of entertainment devices to ensure that content is ultimately experienced as the creator and distributor intended.

Throughout our history, we have introduced numerous innovations that have significantly improved the quality of audio entertainment, such as noise reduction for the recording and cinema industries and surround sound for cinema and home entertainment. Today, we continue to derive the vast majority of our revenue from our audio technologies.

Looking forward, we see a number of industry trends that create opportunities for the continued growth of our audio business, including the ongoing global transition from analog to digital television and consumers' increasing use of mobile devices, such as tablets and smartphones, to play back digital content. Our portfolio of technologies and solutions optimize the audio experience for portable devices to provide consumers with a rich, clear, and immersive sound, despite the bandwidth limitations of online and cellular networks and the physical limitations of devices with tiny speakers.

We also see opportunities to apply our core strengths in areas beyond audio. For example, we believe that significant improvements can be made in the technology currently used to deliver and play back premium video, and we have identified solutions that may substantially improve the video experience. Similarly, we believe we can apply our existing audio technologies to improve the clarity and quality of voice communications in areas such as multi-party teleconferencing.

Business Model

We generate the majority of our revenue by licensing technologies to original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”) of consumer entertainment (“CE”) products and to software vendors. We also generate revenue by selling products and related services to creators and distributors and exhibitors of entertainment content.

We participate in the global entertainment industry in three important ways:

• We offer products, services, and technologies to creators and distributors of entertainment content, such as motion picture, television, and music recording studios, television broadcasters, satellite and cable operators, cinema theatre chains, and increasingly, Internet content streaming and download service providers. These content creators and distributors use our products, services, and technologies to encode and transmit content, creating rich, clear, and immersive audio experiences for consumers upon playback.

• We license technologies, such as Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby TrueHD, to OEMs and software vendors for incorporation into their CE and other products, so that consumers can play back audio content with our technologies in the rich, clear, and immersive manner the creators intended.

• We work directly with standards-setting organizations in the entertainment and technology industries, as well as governments and other regulatory bodies, to promote adoption of our technologies in their standards. As a result, our technologies are included in the majority of worldwide TV shipments to support digital TV standards around the world that mandate our formats. Our technologies are also included in virtually all DVD players, Blu-ray Disc players, audio/video receivers, and personal computer (“PC”) DVD software players.

We license our technologies to OEMs and software vendors in 44 countries and our licensees distribute products incorporating our technologies throughout the world. We sell our products and services in over 80 countries. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 revenue from outside of the U.S. was 68%, 68%, and 66% of our total revenue, respectively. Our licensing business is our most significant revenue stream, representing 86%, 83%, and 77% of our total revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and

32

2010, respectively. Geographic data for our licensing revenue is based on the location of our licensees’ headquarters. Product revenue is based on the destination to which we ship our products, while services revenue is based on the location where services are performed.

Opportunities, Challenges, and Risks

Our licensing and product markets are characterized by rapid technological changes, new and improved product introductions, changing customer demands, evolving industry standards, changing licensee needs, and product obsolescence. We believe that these changes present us with opportunities to provide realistic and immersive audio experiences to consumers through new and emerging delivery channels. However, as described below, our licensing revenue is subject to uncertainties and trends relating to technology and market growth, as well as the mix of CE products sold that incorporate our technologies. Our licensing business also could be affected by adverse general economic conditions, because many of the products in which our technologies are incorporated are discretionary goods. Furthermore, our products business is subject to intense competition and uncertainties relating to the transition to digital cinema and purchasing decisions by our cinema customers. We expect recent declines in our 3D revenue to continue, as the market for 3D products becomes increasingly saturated.

Licensing

Licensing revenue constitutes the majority of our total revenue, representing 86%, 83%, and 77% of total revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

The entertainment industry is in transition. As consumers are presented with more options for receiving entertainment content, competition across the delivery channels has intensified. We see this reflected in the changing composition of our licensing revenue, driven by a shift away from optical disc based products. Our optical disc based revenue is generated from the sale of technology solutions that enable DVD or Blu-ray Disc playback functionality, licensing including the Windows 7 operating system, independent PC DVD software players, DVD, and Blu-ray Disc technologies included in consumer products. However, most of these products can also receive content over mobile or online networks and we have increased our technology penetration into these other distribution channels. Non-optical disc based revenue is generated from the sale of technology solutions other than those used to enable DVD or Blu-ray Disc playback functionality. Non-optical disc based revenue includes licensing revenue derived from products such as TVs, set-top boxes, and mobile devices, as well as from the incorporation of our post processing technologies in a range of devices. We remain focused on delivering the products, tools, and technologies needed to ensure a high quality audio experience from any device.

Looking forward, we expect continued growth in the proportion of our licensing revenue we derive from non-optical disc sources. This will be driven partly by the maturity of optical disc as a method for delivering content, but also by the significant opportunities presented by digital broadcast and online and mobile distribution, as well as the inclusion of our technologies in the Windows 8 operating system to enable the playback of online content. We also see significant opportunities to offer encode/decode solutions in video and voice that leverage our expertise in signal processing, compression, and the capture and playback of content.

Our licensing revenue comes from the following markets and primarily from the inclusion of our technologies in the products indicated for each market:

• Broadcast market: primarily televisions and set-top boxes

• PC market: primarily DVD software players and Microsoft Windows operating systems

• CE market: primarily DVD and Blu-ray Disc players and recorders, audio/video receivers, and home-theater-in-a-box systems

• Other markets:

• Mobile – primarily cell phones, tablets and other mobile devices

• Gaming – primarily video game consoles

• Licensing services – primarily administration of joint licensing programs

• Automotive – primarily in-car DVD players

The growth of the Internet, and the related shift by consumers toward online entertainment content, has resulted in a global trend toward an array of online content streaming and download services. Today content is captured, delivered, and played back in more ways than ever before. Content creators and distributors are increasingly focused on delivering content across a multitude of media and devices with varying bandwidth and performance requirements, including PCs, connected TVs, set-top boxes, gaming consoles, connected Blu-ray Disc players, and a variety of mobile devices. Many of these mobile devices

33

are increasingly designed to capture and distribute content through improved camera and WiFi technologies, as well as to play back rich entertainment experiences. This increasingly complex array of devices, with capability for both creating and playing back content, presents a challenge for content creators and device manufacturers seeking consistent audio quality. We believe this challenge provides an opportunity similar to that of digital broadcast, whereby we can provide solutions to optimize the audio experience across the online and portable device ecosystem.

In the area of content creation and delivery, our technologies are included in DVD, Blu-ray Disc, and certain broadcast standards, and we are working to extend our technologies to online delivery services. Online content aggregators, including Netflix, Amazon, VUDU, Apple, HBO GO, Samsung's Acetrax, and the Roxio Now platform, use our technologies to encode video and audio content. Leading music services such as Rhapsody and Omnifone use our audio encoding tools to deliver a rich music experience to their subscribers. In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, HBO adopted Dolby Digital Plus in its HBO GO content for select connected TVs. HBO will also offer Dolby Digital Plus in its HBO GO service for content delivered to Blu-ray Disc players. In addition, Samsung now offers Dolby Digital Plus surround sound audio through the Acetrax Video on Demand application.

Our broadcast market, driven by demand for our technologies in televisions and set-top boxes, represented approximately 34%, 31%, and 27% of our licensing revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Dolby technology was included in a higher percentage of televisions and set-top boxes in fiscal 2012 which drove increased revenue relative to fiscal 2011.We view the broadcast market as an area for potential continued growth, primarily in geographic markets outside of the U.S. We see opportunities in working with specific operators and standards bodies across emerging markets to adopt our multichannel formats. Given, the percentage of the world's population that lives in countries in emerging markets and the number of televisions and set-top boxes sold in such markets, we believe that these markets present significant opportunities for growth. While there is no guarantee that the counties in the emerging markets will convert to digital television, we intend to ensure that we are well positioned to benefit from such transition if it occurs. We also view broadcast services, such as terrestrial broadcast or IPTV services, which operate under bandwidth constraints, as another area of opportunity for Dolby Digital Plus. These technologies enable the delivery of high quality audio content at reduced bit rates, thereby conserving bandwidth. We may not, however, be able to extend our current success in the broadcast market to these new opportunities.

Our PC market represented approximately 28%, 30%, and 36% of our licensing revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Our technologies are incorporated in the majority of PCs sold today, primarily because of the inclusion of DVD and Blu-ray Disc playback in the majority of PCs and the inclusion of Dolby technologies in the DVD and Blu-ray Disc standards.

Historically, we have licensed our technologies to a range of PC licensees, including independent software vendors (“ISV”), PC OEMs, and operating system providers. The release of new versions of major PC operating systems has often resulted in changes in the mix of our PC licensees. In 2007, Microsoft introduced its Windows Vista operating system, which included our technologies to enable DVD audio playback in two of its editions. In fiscal 2009, Microsoft released its current operating system, Windows 7, which includes our technologies within four editions. As a result, since 2007 the mix of our PC licensing revenue from operating systems has increased relative to that from OEMs and ISVs. We currently license our audio codec technologies directly to OEMs such as Apple, Toshiba, and Sony to support optical disc playback on PCs, and we license our PC Entertainment Experience (“PCEE”) technologies to multiple PC OEMs through our PCEE licensing program.

In May 2012, we entered into an agreement with Microsoft under which Dolby Digital Plus 5.1 channel decoding and Dolby Digital two-channel encoding will be included in all PCs and tablets licensed to run the Windows 8 operating system.  Under the arrangement, OEMs generally will be required to directly license and pay us a base royalty rate for the right to use the Dolby technologies included in Windows 8 installed on the PCs and tablets they produce for online and file-based content.  OEMs will be required to pay a higher per-unit royalty for Windows 8 PCs that also include optical disc playback functionality, which will be implemented by ISV applications. This higher rate is consistent with rates paid historically for the inclusion of Dolby disc playback software in the PC market. In the near term, we expect the majority of PCs to continue to ship with optical disc drives and to include optical disc playback functionality.

We believe the Microsoft Windows 8 arrangement provides a simple and consistent way for OEMs to enable playback with our technologies of content delivered by online services and video in local files on the device. This is a different licensing arrangement than the one we have for Windows 7. The release of Windows 8 did not have a material financial impact in fiscal 2012, as Microsoft continued to license its Windows 7 operating systems with our technologies. The ultimate financial impact of these licensing arrangements for Windows 8 on our licensing revenue is uncertain and will depend on several factors, including:

• The extent and rate at which Windows 8 is adopted in the marketplace;

• The extent to which OEMs include optical disc playback in Windows 8 devices;

• The extent to which earlier versions of Microsoft operating systems, including Windows 7, continue to be licensed after the release of Windows 8;

34

• Our ability to establish and extend licensing relationships directly with PC OEMs and ISVs;

• The rate at which entertainment content shifts from optical disc media to online media, thus reducing the need for PCs to have optical disc drives and DVD and Blu-ray Disc software players; and

• Our ability to extend the adoption of our technologies to online and mobile platforms.

In the short term, revenue from our PC market remains dependent on several factors, including underlying PC unit shipment growth and the extent to which our technologies are included in operating systems and ISV media applications. We continue to face risks relating to:

• Purchasing trends away from traditional PCs and towards portable devices without optical disc drives, such as ultrabooks and tablets, which may not include our technologies;

• The prevalence of PC software that includes our technologies on an unauthorized and infringing basis, for which we receive no royalty payments; and

• Continued decreasing inclusion of ISV media applications by PC OEMs in their Windows 7-based PCs, as Windows 7 already incorporates DVD playback software.

Our CE market, driven primarily by revenue attributable to sales of DVD and Blu-ray Disc players and recorders, represented approximately 18%, 21%, and 22% of licensing revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Blu-ray Disc players continue to represent an important source of revenue within our CE market, as these players are required by the applicable standards of the Blu-ray Disc Association to include Dolby Digital technology for primary audio content and our Dolby Digital Plus technology for secondary audio content. In addition, our Dolby TrueHD technology is an optional audio standard for Blu-ray Disc. Sales of DVD players are declining, as a result of the maturity of the DVD platform and a shift to Blu-ray Disc players and other connected devices capable of delivering content; however, our revenue from sales of Blu-ray Disc players is also decreasing and has not offset the decline in revenue from DVD.

Revenue generated from our other markets includes revenue attributable to mobile, gaming, licensing services, and automotive, and represented approximately 20%, 18%, and 15% of licensing revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Mobile revenue is primarily driven by demand for the Dolby Digital Plus, AAC, Dolby Mobile, and Dolby Digital. We view the mobile device market as an area of opportunity for us to increase revenue; however, actual results may differ from our expectations. In addition, because the mobile device market is a relatively new market for us, our growth in this market is dependent not only on the anticipated growth of the mobile device market as a whole, but also on the success of the mobile devices incorporating our technologies. Revenue attributable to gaming and automotive is primarily driven by sales of video game consoles and in-car entertainment systems, respectively, that incorporate our Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, AAC, and Dolby TrueHD technologies. Licensing services revenue, from administration of joint licensing programs, is primarily driven by demand for standards-based audio compression technologies for broadcast, PC, CE, and mobile products.

Consumer entertainment products throughout the world incorporate our technologies. We expect that sales of such products incorporating our technologies in emerging economies such as Brazil, China, India, and Russia, will increase in the future as consumers in these markets acquire more disposable income with which to purchase entertainment products. However, events in these economies or in the world economy in general may contradict these expectations. Moreover, we expect that OEMs in lower-cost manufacturing countries, including China, will increase production in response to this demand and that traditional OEMs will continue to shift their manufacturing operations to these lower-cost manufacturing countries. There are substantial risks associated with doing business in such countries, including OEMs failing to report or underreporting shipments of products incorporating our technologies, that have affected and will continue to affect our operating results.

Revenue from Microsoft represented approximately 14%, 13%, and 12% of our total revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, and included licensing revenue from our PC, CE, and other markets.

Products

Products revenue is driven primarily by sales of equipment to cinema operators and broadcasters and represented 11%, 14%, and 20% of our total revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Our cinema products represented approximately 87%, 87%, and 90% of total products revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Sales of our cinema products tend to fluctuate based on the underlying trends in the cinema industry, including the popularity of individual movies, as cinema owners often purchase equipment to meet expected box office demand.

The cinema industry is transitioning from traditional film to digital cinema, and we estimate that the industry is more than halfway through this transition. Digital cinema offers motion picture studios a means to save costs in printing and distributing movies, combat piracy, and enable repeated movie playback without degradation in image and audio quality. Our cinema

35

products include our Dolby Digital Cinema screen server and central library server, for the storage and playback of digital content, and our digital audio processor, which provides audio control for our digital cinema servers. We expect that most cinema owners who are either constructing new theaters or upgrading existing theaters will choose digital cinema products over traditional film cinema products. However, our competitive position in the digital cinema market is not as strong as our position in the traditional film cinema market. For example, digital cinema specifications are based on open standards which, unlike traditional cinema standards, do not include our proprietary audio technologies. Furthermore, we are facing more pricing and other competitive pressures for our digital cinema products than we experience for our traditional film cinema products.

Digital cinema standards are defined by the Digital Cinema Initiative (“DCI”) specifications, and we have developed software for our currently available digital cinema server that is DCI compliant. This software was made commercially available during fiscal 2012. We do not have significant contractual provisions arising from the sale of products relating to DCI compliance that would require additional performance from us.

Our digital 3D products provide 3D image capabilities when combined with a digital cinema projector and server. Our cinema products revenue has been negatively impacted by declines in unit shipments and lower selling prices for 3D products, as the market for 3D cinema equipment has become increasingly competitive. We also believe the decrease in revenue from our 3D products reflects the increasing saturation of 3D enabled screens within the cinema industry.

Our traditional film cinema products are used primarily to read, decode, and play back film soundtracks, to calibrate cinema sound systems, and to enable soundtracks encoded in digital audio formats to be played back on analog cinema audio systems. As investment by the cinema industry in digital cinema has increased, revenue from our traditional film cinema products has declined, and we expect this decline to continue.

Our broadcast products represented approximately 10%, 10%, and 9% of products revenue in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Our broadcast products are used to encode, transmit, and decode multiple channels of high quality audio content for DTV and HDTV program production and broadcast distribution and to measure the subjective loudness of audio content within broadcast programming.

In fiscal 2011, we began selling our Professional Reference Monitor product, a flat-panel video reference display for video professionals. These video professionals use the monitor for color critical tasks, such as calibrating color accuracy to professional reference standards. Our Professional Reference Monitor uses our dynamic range imaging technologies, which enhance contrast and extend brightness and dynamic range, while reducing power consumption in LED backlit LCD televisions. We did not generate significant revenue from this product in fiscal 2012.

Services

Services revenue represented approximately 3% of total revenue in each of fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010. The level of our services revenue is primarily tied to activity in the cinema industry, and in particular, to the number of movies being produced and distributed by studios and independent filmmakers. Several factors influence the number of movies produced in a given fiscal period, including strikes and work stoppages within the cinema industry, as well as tax incentive arrangements provided by many governments to promote local filmmaking. Services revenue is also impacted by the transition to digital cinema in some regions.

Other

We are party to an agreement under which we obtained naming rights and related benefits with respect to the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, California. Under the agreement, we made one annual payment in fiscal 2012 and will subsequently make semi-annual payments over the term, which will be recorded as marketing expenses. Our payment obligations are conditioned in part on the Academy Awards® being held and broadcast from the Dolby Theatre. For additional details, see Note 10 “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements. In addition to these contractual obligations, we anticipate that we will continue to incur increased marketing expenses associated with promoting our products, technologies, and brand at the Dolby Theatre.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”), and pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations. GAAP and SEC rules and regulations require us to use accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingencies as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during a fiscal period. The SEC considers an accounting policy and estimate to be critical if it is both important to a company’s financial condition and/or results of operations and requires significant judgment on the part of management in its application. On a regular basis, we evaluate our assumptions, judgment, and estimates. We have discussed the selection and

36

development of the critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. The Audit Committee has reviewed our related disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Although we believe that our judgments and estimates are appropriate and correct, actual results may differ from these estimates.

We consider the following to be critical accounting policies and estimates because we believe they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management judgments about matters that are uncertain. If actual results or events differ materially, our reported financial condition and results of operation for future periods could be materially affected. See our “Risk Factors” for further information on the potential risks to our future results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

We enter into revenue arrangements with our customers to license technologies, trademarks, and know-how and to sell products and services. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. Judgment is required to assess whether collectibility is probable. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of our customer's recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter of credit between the customer's financial institution and our financial institution, and other factors. Some of our revenue arrangements include multiple elements, such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services.

We evaluate each element in a multiple element (“ME”) arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value and delivery of an undelivered element is both probable and within our control. When these criteria are not met, the delivered and undelivered elements are combined and the arrangement fees are allocated to this combined single unit.

If the unit separation criteria are met, we account for each element within a ME arrangement (such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services) separately, and we allocate fees from the arrangement based on its relative selling price, which we establish using a selling price hierarchy. We determine the selling price of each element based on its VSOE, if available, third-party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.

For some arrangements, customers receive certain elements over a period of time, after delivery of the initial product. These elements may include support and maintenance and/or the right to receive upgrades. Revenue allocated to the undelivered element is recognized either over its estimated service period or when the upgrade is delivered. We do not recognize revenue that is contingent upon the future delivery of products or services or upon future performance obligations. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when we have completed all contractual obligations.

We determine our best estimate of the selling price for an individual element within a ME revenue arrangement using the same methods used to determine the selling price of an element sold on a standalone basis. If we sell the element on a standalone basis, we estimate the selling price by considering actual sales prices. Otherwise, we estimate the selling price by considering internal factors such as pricing practices and margin objectives. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies, customer demands, and industry technology lifecycles. Management applies judgment to establish margin objectives, pricing strategies, and technology lifecycles.

Revenue recognition for transactions which involve software, such as fees we earn from certain system licensees, requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for those elements. For some of our ME arrangements, customers receive certain elements of the arrangement over a period of time or after delivery of the initial software. These elements may include support and maintenance. The fair values of these elements are recognized over the estimated period for which these elements will be delivered, which is sometimes the estimated life of the software. If we do not have VSOE of fair value for any undelivered element included in these ME arrangements for software, we defer revenue until all elements are delivered and/or services have been performed, or until we have VSOE of fair value for all remaining undelivered elements. If the undelivered element is support and we do not have fair value for the support element, revenue for the entire arrangement is bundled and recognized ratably over the support period.

We account for our digital cinema server sales as ME arrangements that may include up to three separate units, or elements, of accounting. The first element consists of our digital cinema server hardware and the accompanying software, which is essential to the functionality of the hardware. This element is typically delivered at the time of sale. The second element is the right to receive support and maintenance, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered over a service period subsequent to the initial sale. The third element is the right to receive specified upgrades, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered when a specified upgrade is available, subsequent to the initial sale. The application of the revenue accounting standards to our digital cinema server sales typically results in the allocation of a substantial majority of the arrangement fees to the delivered hardware element based on

37

its ESP, relative to the VSOE or ESP of the other elements, which we recognize as revenue at the time of sale. A small portion of the arrangement fees is allocated to the undelivered support and maintenance element, and in some cases to the undelivered specified upgrade element, based on the VSOE or ESP of each element. The portion of the arrangement fees allocated to the support and maintenance element is recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated service period and the portion of the arrangement fees allocated to specified upgrades is recognized as revenue upon delivery of the upgrade.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Long-Lived Assets

We test goodwill for impairment annually during our third fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 which amends the rules for testing goodwill for impairment. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-08 for our annual goodwill impairment test performed in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. ASU 2011-08 permits entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test.

In performing the qualitative assessment, we consider events and circumstances, including but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, changes in management or key personnel, changes in strategy, changes in customers, changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting unit's net assets and changes in the price of our common stock. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, then the two-step goodwill impairment test is not performed.

If the two-step goodwill test is performed, we evaluate and test our goodwill for impairment at a reporting-unit level using expected future cash flows to be generated by the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill over the calculated fair value of the goodwill. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below. Our operating segments are aligned with the management principles of our business.

We completed our annual goodwill impairment assessment in the fiscal quarter ended June 29, 2012. At the time of our annual goodwill impairment test for fiscal 2012, we had two reporting units: Via, which corresponds to our wholly owned subsidiary and has no assigned goodwill, and Dolby Entertainment Technology ("DET"), with goodwill of $263.5 million. We determined, after performing a qualitative review and assessing the totality of the events and circumstances described above, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount. Accordingly, there was no indication of impairment and the two-step goodwill impairment test was not performed. We did not recognize any goodwill impairment losses in fiscal 2012, 2011, or 2010.

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Our intangible assets principally consist of acquired technology, patents, trademarks, customer relationships, and contracts, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives ranging from two to fifteen years.

We review long-lived assets, including intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or a change in circumstances indicate an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparing its carrying value to the total future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If it is determined that an asset is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We make estimates and judgments that affect our accounting for income taxes. This includes estimating actual tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences, including the timing of the recognition of stock-based compensation expense, result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheets. We also assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent that we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance.

Our policy is to recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position is sustainable upon examination by tax authorities. We include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within our provision for income taxes. When accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued are reduced in the period that such determination is made and are reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.

Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, the deferred tax asset and liability balances, the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, and the reserve resulting from uncertainties in income tax positions. Our financial position and results of operations may be materially affected if actual results differ significantly from

38

these estimates or if the estimates are adjusted in future periods.

Valuation and Classification of Investments

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

We classify our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value using a three-level hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the investment that are based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity, such as market quoted prices. GAAP establishes a three-level hierarchy prioritizing the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: the fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets that are accessible by us at the measurement date for identical investments, described as Level 1, and the lowest priority to valuation techniques using unobservable inputs, described as Level 3. We obtain the fair value of our Level 2 financial instruments from a professional pricing service, which may use quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments. Fair value from this professional pricing source can also be based on pricing models whereby all significant inputs, including maturity dates, issue dates, settlement dates, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and other market related data, are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset.

The degree to which estimates and judgment are used in determining fair value, is generally dependent upon the market pricing information available for the investments, the availability of observable inputs, the frequency of trading in the investments and the investment’s complexity. If different judgments regarding inputs were made, we could potentially reach different conclusions regarding the fair value of our investments.

Stock-Based Compensation

We determine the expense for all employee stock-based compensation awards by estimating their fair value and recognizing that value as an expense, on a ratable basis, in our consolidated financial statements over the requisite service period in which our employees earn the awards. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of employee stock options at the date of the grant. To determine the fair value of a stock-based award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, we make assumptions regarding the expected term of the award, the expected future volatility of our stock price over the expected term of the award, and the risk-free interest rate over the expected term of the award. We estimate the expected term of our stock-based awards by evaluating historical exercise patterns of our employees. We use a blend of the historical volatility of our common stock and the implied volatility of our traded options as an estimate of the expected volatility of our stock price over the expected term of the awards. We use an average interest rate based on U.S. Treasury instruments with terms consistent with the expected term of our awards to estimate the risk-free interest rate. We reduce the stock-based compensation expense for estimated forfeitures based on our historical experience. We are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of the grant and revise our estimate, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from our estimate.

Results of Operations

Revenue

	Fiscal Year Ended			Change					Fiscal Year Ended			Change					Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			$			%		September 30, 2011			$			%		September 24, 2010
	($ in thousands)
Licensing	$	794,563		$	4,223		1	%	$	790,340		$	79,866		11	%	$	710,474
Percentage of total revenue	86		%						83		%						77		%
Products	103,388			(28,223		)	(21	)%	131,611			(48,791		)	(27	)%	180,402
Percentage of total revenue	11		%						14		%						20		%
Services	28,313			(5,241		)	(16	)%	33,554			1,717			5	%	31,837
Percentage of total revenue	3		%						3		%						3		%
Total revenue	$	926,264		$	(29,241	)	(3	)%	$	955,505		$	32,792		4	%	$	922,713

Licensing.    The 1% increase in licensing revenue from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 was primarily driven by increases in revenue from our broadcast and other markets, partially offset by decreases from our CE and PC markets. The increase in

39

revenue from our broadcast market was primarily driven by higher shipments in fiscal 2012 of digital televisions and set-top boxes that incorporate our technologies. The increase in revenue from our other markets was primarily driven by increases in sales of mobile and tablet devices incorporating our technologies. The decrease in revenue from our CE market was primarily driven by decreases in revenue from DVD and Blu-Ray Disc players, as more content is delivered on devices that do not contain optical drives. The decrease in revenue from our PC market was primarily driven by decreased ISV media applications in PC shipments.

The 11% increase in licensing revenue from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011 was primarily driven by an increase in revenue from our broadcast and other markets, and to a lesser extent, by increases in revenue from our CE market, partially offset by decreases from our PC market. The increase in revenue from our broadcast market was primarily driven by higher shipments in fiscal 2011 of digital televisions and set-top boxes that incorporate our technologies. The increase in revenue from our other markets was primarily driven by higher back royalties, in addition to increases in sales of devices incorporating our Dolby Mobile technology. The increase in revenue from our CE market was primarily driven by increases in revenue from shipments of Blu-Ray Disc players, home-theater-in-a-box systems, digital media adaptors, and audio/video receivers that incorporate our technologies, which were partially offset by a decrease in revenue from shipments of standard DVD players. The decrease in revenue from our PC market was primarily driven by decreased ISV media applications in PC shipments.

Products.    The 21% decrease in products revenue from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 was primarily due to decreases in our 3D and traditional cinema products driven by lower shipments and lower selling prices.

The 27% decrease in products revenue from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011 was due to decreases in 3D and traditional cinema products revenue in fiscal 2011, coupled with our adoption of new revenue recognition accounting standards in fiscal 2010. Decreases in 3D products revenue in fiscal 2011 resulted from increased competition and promotional pricing, while decreases in traditional cinema products revenue were primarily due to lower shipments, as more exhibitors converted to digital cinema. In addition, products revenue in fiscal 2010 included recognition of $29.7 million of deferred revenue related to sales prior to the beginning of the year, which were accounted for under previous revenue accounting standards. In fiscal 2011 substantially all products revenue resulting from current period sales were accounted for under the new accounting standards.

Services.    The 16% decrease in services revenue from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 was attributable primarily to a decrease in film-based production services revenue as the cinema industry transitions to digital cinema as well as decreases in virtual print fees, which were generated from certain leased digital cinema assets, as we discontinued this program in fiscal 2011. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in maintenance and support services.

The 5% increase in services revenue from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011 was primarily driven by increases in revenue from support and maintenance for digital cinema equipment and from other theater services.

Gross Margin

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
	($ in thousands)
Cost of licensing	$	12,924		$	17,620		$	17,565
Licensing gross margin percentage	98		%	98		%	98		%
Cost of products	66,325			81,328			90,695
Products gross margin percentage	36		%	38		%	50		%
Cost of services	12,778			12,223			13,961
Services gross margin percentage	55		%	64		%	56		%
Impairment of products provided under operating leases	—			—			9,594
Total gross margin percentage	90		%	88		%	86		%

Licensing Gross Margin.    We license intellectual property to our customers that may be internally developed, acquired by us, or licensed from third parties. Our cost of licensing consists principally of amortization expenses associated with purchased intangible assets and intangible assets acquired in business combinations. Our cost of licensing also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then sublicense to our customers. Licensing gross margin was unchanged from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 and from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011.

Product Gross Margin.    Cost of products primarily consists of the cost of materials related to products sold, applied labor and manufacturing overhead, and, to a lesser extent, amortization of certain intangible assets. Our cost of products also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then include in our products. Products gross

40

margin decreased from 38% to 36% from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012, due to lower selling prices for digital cinema and traditional cinema products, lower shipments of 3D, traditional cinema and broadcast products and excess manufacturing capacity charges in fiscal 2012, partially offset by a decrease in discrete charges related to inventory valuation and other inventory adjustments.

Product gross margin decreased from 50% to 38% from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011, due in part to promotional pricing on 3D and digital cinema products in fiscal 2011. The decrease in gross margin for fiscal 2011 is further attributable to discrete charges of $6.4 million, consisting primarily of $6.2 million related to 3D and broadcast inventory valuation and other inventory adjustments.

Services Gross Margin.    Cost of services primarily consists of personnel and personnel-related costs for employees performing our professional services, the cost of outside consultants, and reimbursable expenses incurred on behalf of customers. Services gross margin decreased from 64% to 55% from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012, primarily due to decreased revenues from certain higher margin service offerings.

Services gross margin increased from 56% to 64% from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011, primarily due to a higher percentage of support and maintenance revenue, which has higher gross margins due to lower associated costs. In addition, depreciation expense related to digital cinema equipment leased to exhibitors was lower in fiscal 2011.

Impairment of Products Provided Under Operating Leases.    Our products provided under operating leases represent digital cinema equipment that we leased to exhibitors beginning in fiscal 2005 in an effort to encourage the cinema industry to transition to digital cinema. We receive a virtual print fee from participating film studios for each digital print delivered for exhibition on this equipment. Based on our estimates of future cash flows from virtual print fees and the potential sale value of this equipment, we determined that the equipment was impaired in fiscal 2010. Accordingly, we recorded the $9.6 million excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair market value of the equipment as an impairment charge. We had historically recorded the depreciation of our products provided under operating leases to cost of services.

Operating Expenses

	Fiscal Year Ended			Change					Fiscal Year Ended			Change					Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			$			%		September 30, 2011			$			%		September 24, 2010
	($ in thousands)
Research and development	$	140,143		$	16,223		13	%	$	123,920		$	18,942		18	%	$	104,978
Percentage of total revenue	15		%						13		%						11		%
Sales and marketing	181,736			32,094			21	%	149,642			19,482			15	%	130,160
Percentage of total revenue	20		%						16		%						14		%
General and administrative	149,175			11,542			8	%	137,633			18,280			15	%	119,353
Percentage of total revenue	16		%						14		%						13		%
Restructuring charges, net	1,191			(2,215		)	(65	)%	3,406			(3,620		)	(52	)%	7,026
Percentage of total revenue	—		%						—		%						1		%
	$	472,245		$	57,644		14	%	$	414,601		$	53,084		15	%	$	361,517

Research and Development.    Research and development expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits expenses, including stock-based compensation, consulting and contract labor costs, depreciation and amortization expenses, facilities costs, and information technology expenses. The 13% increase in research and development expenses from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 was primarily driven by increases in compensation and benefits expenses related to increased headcount, higher information and technology expenses, higher facilities and related costs resulting from an increase in the number of offices, and increases in prototype expenses relating to new Cinema and Professional Reference Monitor products.

The 18% increase in research and development expenses from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011 was primarily driven by increases in personnel, facilities, and information technology expenses related to increased headcount, as well as stock-based compensation expense. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in performance-based compensation.

Sales and Marketing.    Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits expenses, including stock-based compensation, marketing and promotional expenses, travel-related expenses for our sales and marketing personnel, facilities costs, depreciation and amortization expenses, and information technology expenses. The 21% increase in sales and marketing expenses from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 was primarily driven by increases in compensation and benefits expenses related to increased headcount, including stock-based compensation, higher consulting and marketing costs due to promotional events and expenses associated with the agreement for naming rights related to the Dolby Theatre and due to the

41

launch of Dolby Atmos, as well as increased facilities costs resulting from an increase in the number of offices. Increased settlements from implementation licensees in fiscal 2012 slightly offset the increases noted above. These settlements are recorded as an offset to sales and marketing expenses.

The 15% increase in sales and marketing expenses from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011 was primarily driven by increases in personnel costs, due to increased headcount, and stock-based compensation expense, as well as higher facilities and information technology expenses resulting from worldwide expansion. Also contributing to the increase in fiscal 2011 were lower gains on settlements from implementation licensees, which are reductions to sales and marketing expenses, of $5.6 million in fiscal 2011, compared to $7.8 million in fiscal 2010. These increases in fiscal 2011 were partially offset by a decrease in performance-based compensation.

General and Administrative.    General and administrative expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits expenses, including stock-based compensation, depreciation, information technology expenses, professional fees, consulting and contract labor and facilities costs. The 8% increase in general and administrative expenses from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 was primarily due to increases in compensation and benefit expenses related to increased headcount, higher professional fees primarily related to patent filings and litigation, and to a lesser extent, an increase in depreciation expense primarily related to implementation of recent IT projects. These were partially offset by decreases in consulting and external labor costs.

The 15% increase in general and administrative expenses from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011 was primarily due to increases in consulting and contract labor, stock-based compensation expense, and professional fees related to patent filings and litigation, partially offset by a decrease in performance-based compensation.

Restructuring Charges, net.    Restructuring charges for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 primarily include severance charges attributable to the reorganization of our global business infrastructure and a strategic restructuring program. Restructuring charges for fiscal 2010 also include an impairment charge related to the decision to sell one of our buildings in the U.K. For additional details, see Note 7 “Restructuring” to our consolidated financial statements.

Other Income, Net

	Fiscal Year Ended			Change					Fiscal Year Ended		Change					Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			$			%		September 30, 2011		$			%		September 24, 2010
	($ in thousands)
Interest income	$	6,411		$	(2,565	)	(29	)%	$	8,976	$	1,678		23	%	$	7,298
Interest expense	(196		)	(1,223		)	(119	)%	1,027		1,730			246	%	(703		)
Other income/(expense), net	784			(123		)	(14	)%	907		(129		)	(12	)%	1,036
Total other income, net	$	6,999		$	(3,911	)	(36	)%	$	10,910	$	3,279		43	%	$	7,631

Other income, net, primarily consists of interest income earned on cash, cash equivalents, and investments. In fiscal 2010, this income was offset by interest expense principally attributable to debt balances on certain of our facilities. All facility-related debt was fully paid in fiscal 2010. In fiscal 2011 interest expense reflects a $1.4 million reversal of interest expense related to VAT reserve releases. Also included are net gains/losses from foreign currency transactions, net gains/losses from sales of available-for-sale securities, net gains/losses from trading securities, and net gains/losses from derivative instruments.

The decrease in other income, net from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 was primarily due to a decrease in interest income and an increase in interest expense. The decrease in interest income was due to a decrease in cash, cash equivalents and investment balances, in aggregate, compared to fiscal 2011 and lower average interest rates on our investments. The interest expense increased in fiscal 2012, when compared to fiscal 2011, as the interest expense in fiscal 2011 included the impact of reversal of interest expense related to VAT reserve releases.

The increase in other income, net from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011 was primarily due to $2.2 million of interest income related to back royalties, as well as the reversal of interest expense related to VAT reserve releases. In addition, interest expense decreased in fiscal 2011, when compared to fiscal 2010, as all long-term debt was repaid in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

42

Income Taxes

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
	($ in thousands)
Provision for income taxes	$	103,857		$	130,061		$	154,185
Effective tax rate	28		%	30		%	35		%

Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2012 was 28%, as compared to 30% in fiscal 2011. Our effective tax rate reflects additional benefits from our election to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our undistributed earnings in certain foreign subsidiaries. We also benefited from a change in the State of California apportionment sourcing rules, which began to affect our current California taxes beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. These benefits were partially offset by the expiration of the federal research and development tax credits, beginning January 1, 2012, which resulted in an increase in our effective tax rate.

Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 was 30%, as compared to 35% in fiscal 2010. In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, we initiated a policy to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our undistributed earnings in certain foreign subsidiaries, which are subject to tax rates lower than those in the U.S. As a result, our fiscal 2011 tax rate decreased. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we reduced our current deferred tax assets to reflect a change to our expected California tax rate for fiscal 2012 and subsequent years, increasing our effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 by 1.4%. Additionally, in the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, a change in the tax law retroactively reinstated the federal research and development tax credits. As a result, we recognized an increase in federal research and development tax credits for fiscal 2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, thereby further lowering our effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 by 0.5%.

Further, in the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, we released $11.0 million of our deferred tax liability related to the amortization of an intangible asset from a prior year acquisition, as a result of the restructuring of our international operations, which also favorably impacted our effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 by 2.5%. For additional information related to effective tax rates, see Note 8 “Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements.

Liquidity, Capital Resources, and Financial Condition

As of September 28, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $492.6 million, which consisted of cash and highly-liquid money market funds. In addition, we had short-term and long-term investments of $664.3 million, which consisted primarily of municipal debt securities, corporate bonds, and U.S. agency securities. Of our total cash, cash equivalents, and investments held as of September 28, 2012, approximately $234.4 million, or 20%, was held by our foreign subsidiaries. This represented a $88.1 million increase from the $146.3 million that was held by our foreign subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011. A majority of the amounts held outside of the U.S. are generally utilized to support non-U.S. liquidity needs in order to fund operations and other growth of our non-U.S. subsidiaries and acquisitions. Our policy is to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our undistributed earnings in certain foreign subsidiaries. If these undistributed earnings held by foreign subsidiaries are repatriated to the U.S., they may be subject to U.S. federal income taxes and foreign withholding taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits.

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	492,600		$	551,512
Short-term investments	302,693			391,281
Long-term investments	361,614			272,797
Accounts receivable, net	43,495			61,815
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	130,923			127,922
Working capital(a)	813,446			999,213
Net cash provided by operating activities	389,797			403,688
Capital expenditures(b)	(167,349		)	(47,362		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(194,679		)	(236,702		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(254,318		)	(162,498		)

(a) Working capital consists of total current assets less total current liabilities.

(b) Capital expenditures consist of purchases of land, building, building fixtures, office equipment, computer hardware and software, leasehold improvements, and production and test equipment.

43

Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents, and investments, as well as cash flows from operations. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents, and potential cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our currently anticipated cash requirements through at least the next 12 months.

We have historically generated significant cash from our operations; however, there can be no assurance that our operations will continue to generate significant cash flows in the future. We retain sufficient cash holdings to support our operations and we also purchase investment grade securities diversified among security types, industries, and issuers. We have used cash generated from our operations to fund a variety of activities related to our business in addition to our ongoing operations, including business expansion and growth, acquisitions, and repurchases of our common stock. Cash provided by operations and the value of our investment portfolio could also be affected by various risks and uncertainties, as described in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

Net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2012decreased$13.9 million when compared to fiscal 2011, primarily due to the following:

• A decrease in net income, as adjusted for non-cash items,

• A decrease in deferred revenue in fiscal 2012 due to timing of licensing contracts, offset by

• A decrease in accounts receivable due to timing differences and higher collections in fiscal 2012.

Net cash used in investing activities during fiscal 2012decreased$42.0 million when compared to fiscal 2011, primarily due to the following:

• An increase in proceeds from the sale and maturities of available-for-sale securities, offset by

• An increase in capital expenditures in fiscal 2012 which includes the purchase of the 1275 Market Street Building, and

• Acquisition of IMM Sound.

Net cash used in financing activities during fiscal 2012increased$91.8 million when compared to fiscal 2011, primarily due to the following:

• An increase in share repurchases of our Class A common stock, and

• A decrease in net proceeds from the exercise of stock options granted to employees and the related tax benefit.

Off-Balance-Sheet and Contractual Obligations

Our liquidity is not dependent on the use of off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

The following table presents a summary of our contractual obligations and commitments as of September 28, 2012:

	Payments Due By Period
	1 Year		2-3 Years		4-5 Years		More than 5 Years		Total
	(in thousands)
Naming rights (1)	$	—	$	14,773	$	15,144	$	126,414	$	156,331
Operating leases (2)	13,751		18,700		10,008		5,981		48,440
Purchase obligations (3)	3,832		712		—		—		4,544
Total	$	17,583	$	34,185	$	25,152	$	132,395	$	209,315

(1) In April 2012, we entered into an agreement for naming rights and related benefits with respect to the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, California, the location of the Academy Awards®. In exchange for these rights and other benefits, we made one annual payment in fiscal 2012 and will subsequently make semi-annual payments over the term. Our payment obligations are conditioned in part on the Academy Awards® being held and broadcast from the Dolby Theatre. The term of the agreement is 20 years.

(2) Operating lease payments include future minimum rental commitments, including those payable to our principal stockholder and portions attributable to the controlling interests in our wholly owned subsidiaries, for non-cancelable operating leases of office space as of September 28, 2012.

(3) Our purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services, entered into in the ordinary course of business. These represent non-cancelable commitments for which a penalty would be imposed if the agreement was canceled for any reason other than an event of default as described by the agreement.

As of September 28, 2012, we had an accrued liability for unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties, net of related deferred tax assets, totaling $14.2 million. We are unable to estimate when any cash settlement with a taxing authority might occur.

44

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments.

As of September 28, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $492.6 million, which consisted of cash and highly-liquid money market funds. In addition, we had short-term and long-term investments of $664.3 million, which consisted primarily of municipal debt securities, corporate bonds, and U.S. agency securities. Our investment policy and strategy are focused on the preservation of capital and on supporting our liquidity requirements. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes, nor do we use leveraged financial instruments. Our holdings of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, the majority of which are managed by external managers, meet the guidelines of our investment policy. We invest in highly rated securities with a minimum credit rating of A- and our policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer other than the U.S. government. At September 28, 2012, our weighted average portfolio credit quality was AA and the weighted average maturity of our investment portfolio was approximately one year.

The investments within our fixed-income portfolio are subject to fluctuations in interest rates, which could affect our financial position, and to a lesser extent, results of operations. Based on our investment portfolio balance as of September 28, 2012, hypothetical changes in interest rates of 1% and 0.5% would have an impact on the carrying value of our portfolio of approximately $6.3 million and $3.2 million, respectively.

We do not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes, nor do we use leveraged financial instruments.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We maintain sales, marketing, and business operations in foreign countries, most significantly in the United Kingdom, Australia, China, the Netherlands, and Germany. We also conduct a growing portion of our business outside of the U.S. through subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar (primarily British Pound, Australian Dollar, Chinese Yuan Renminbi, and Euro). As a result, we face exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the financial results of our international operations are translated from local currency into U.S. dollars upon consolidation. Most of our revenue from international markets is denominated in U.S. dollars, while the operating expenses of our international subsidiaries are predominantly denominated in local currency. Therefore, if the U.S. dollar weakens against the local currency, we will have increased operating expenses, which will only be partially offset by net revenue. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar strengthens against the local currency, operating expenses will decrease, which will only be partially offset by net revenue. Additionally, foreign exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency result in gains or losses that are reflected in our consolidated statements of operations. Our international operations are subject to risks typical of international business, including, but not limited to, differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility.

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against assets and liabilities for which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure, in an effort to reduce the risk that our earnings will be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. These derivative instruments are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded to interest and other (expense)/income, net in our consolidated statements of operations. Our foreign currency forward contracts which are not designated as hedging instruments are used to reduce the exchange rate risk associated primarily with intercompany receivables and payables. These contracts do not subject us to material balance sheet risk due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these derivatives are intended to offset gains and losses on the related receivables and payables for which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure. As of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the outstanding derivative instruments had maturities of 30 days or less and the total notional amounts of outstanding contracts were $5.0 million and $4.7 million, respectively. The fair values of these contracts were not material as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, and were included in accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. For additional information related to our foreign currency forward contracts, see Note 5 “Fair Value Measurements” to our consolidated financial statements.

A sensitivity analysis was performed on all of our foreign currency forward contracts as of September 28, 2012. This sensitivity analysis was based on a modeling technique that measures the hypothetical market value resulting from a 10% shift in the value of exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar. For these forward contracts, duration modeling was used where hypothetical changes are made to the spot rates of the currency. A 10% increase in the value of the U.S. dollar would lead to an increase in the fair value of our financial instruments by $0.3 million. Conversely, a 10% decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar would result in a decrease in the fair value of these financial instruments by $0.3 million.

45

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	47
Consolidated Balance Sheets	49
Consolidated Statements of Operations	50
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income	51
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	52
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	53

46

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Dolby Laboratories, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 28, 2012. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 28, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Dolby Laboratories, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated November 15, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California

November 15, 2012

47

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Dolby Laboratories, Inc.:

We have audited Dolby Laboratories, Inc.’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 28, 2012, and our report dated November 15, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California

November 15, 2012

48

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	492,600	$	551,512
Short-term investments	302,693		391,281
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $956 at September 28, 2012 and $2,466 at September 30, 2011	43,495		61,815
Inventories	16,700		26,244
Deferred taxes	80,966		90,869
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	33,832		36,877
Total current assets	970,286		1,158,598
Long-term investments	361,614		272,797
Property, plant and equipment, net	254,676		117,107
Intangible assets, net	56,526		51,573
Goodwill	281,375		263,260
Deferred taxes	22,634		14,779
Other non-current assets	13,687		6,273
Total assets	$	1,960,798	$	1,884,387
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	14,831	$	10,887
Accrued liabilities	116,092		117,035
Income taxes payable	2,424		4,762
Deferred revenue	23,493		26,701
Total current liabilities	156,840		159,385
Long-term deferred revenue	18,192		15,526
Deferred taxes	2,696		671
Other non-current liabilities	39,837		23,455
Total liabilities	217,565		199,037
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value, one vote per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized: 46,496,635 shares issued and outstanding at September 28, 2012 and 51,860,546 at September 30, 2011	46		52
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value, ten votes per share, 500,000,000 shares authorized: 56,598,829 shares issued and outstanding at September 28, 2012 and 57,559,554 at September 30, 2011	57		58
Additional paid-in capital	—		210,681
Retained earnings	1,709,479		1,445,189
Accumulated other comprehensive income	10,687		7,533
Total stockholders’ equity—Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	1,720,269		1,663,513
Controlling interest	22,964		21,837
Total stockholders’ equity	1,743,233		1,685,350
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,960,798	$	1,884,387

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

49

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
Revenue:
Licensing	$	794,563		$	790,340		$	710,474
Products	103,388			131,611			180,402
Services	28,313			33,554			31,837
Total revenue	926,264			955,505			922,713
Cost of revenue:
Cost of licensing	12,924			17,620			17,565
Cost of products	66,325			81,328			90,695
Cost of services	12,778			12,223			13,961
Impairment of products provided under operating leases	—			—			9,594
Total cost of revenue	92,027			111,171			131,815
Gross margin	834,237			844,334			790,898
Operating expenses:
Research and development	140,143			123,920			104,978
Sales and marketing	181,736			149,642			130,160
General and administrative	149,175			137,633			119,353
Restructuring charges, net	1,191			3,406			7,026
Total operating expenses	472,245			414,601			361,517
Operating income	361,992			429,733			429,381
Interest income	6,411			8,976			7,298
Interest expense	(196		)	1,027			(703		)
Other income, net	784			907			1,036
Income before provision for income taxes	368,991			440,643			437,012
Provision for income taxes	(103,857		)	(130,061		)	(154,185		)
Net income including controlling interest	265,134			310,582			282,827
Less: net (income) / loss attributable to controlling interest	(832		)	(1,315		)	620
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	264,302		$	309,267		$	283,447
Net income per share:
Basic	$	2.47		$	2.78		$	2.50
Diluted	$	2.46		$	2.75		$	2.46
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic	106,926			111,444			113,452
Diluted	107,541			112,554			115,388
Related party rent expense included in general and administrative expenses	$	1,372		$	1,372		$	1,372
Related party rent expense included in net income attributable to controlling interest	$	3,270		$	3,098		$	3,225

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

50

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)

	Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
	Shares of Class A common stock		Class A common stock			Shares of Class B common stock		Class B common stock			Additional paid-in capital			Retained earnings			Accumulated other comprehensive income			Total Dolby Laboratories, Inc.			Controlling Interest			Total			Comprehensive Income
Balance at September 25, 2009	53,412		$	53		60,437		$	60		$	478,979		$	852,475		$	9,541		$	1,341,108		$	21,997		$	1,363,105
Net income	—		—			—		—			—			283,447			—			283,447			(620		)	282,827			282,827
Translation adjustments, net of taxes of $2,654	—		—			—		—			—			—			(1,118		)	(1,118		)	(172		)	(1,290		)	(1,290		)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $379	—		—			—		—			—			—			(622		)	(622		)	—			(622		)	(622		)
Distributions to controlling interest	—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			(263		)	(263		)	—
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—			—		—			27,694			—			—			27,694			—			27,694			—
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense	—		—			—		—			827			—			—			827			—			827			—
Repurchase of common stock	(4,148	)	(4		)	—		—			(241,358		)	—			—			(241,362		)	—			(241,362		)	—
Tax benefit / (deficiency) from stock incentive plans	—		—			—		—			24,134			—			—			24,134			—			24,134			—
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans	1,420		2			—		—			39,991			—			—			39,993			—			39,993			—
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted stock	(51	)	—			—		—			(2,769		)	—			—			(2,769		)	—			(2,769		)	—
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock	2,223		2			(2,223	)	(2		)	—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Exercise of Class B stock options	—		—			1,014		1			2,404			—			—			2,405			—			2,405			—
Balance at September 24, 2010	52,856		53			59,228		59			329,902			1,135,922			7,801			1,473,737			20,942			1,494,679			280,915
Net income	—		—			—		—			—			309,267			—			309,267			1,315			310,582			310,582
Translation adjustments, net of taxes of $2	—		—			—		—			—			—			639			639			(130		)	509			509
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $599	—		—			—		—			—			—			(907		)	(907		)	—			(907		)	(907		)
Distributions to controlling interest	—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			(290		)	(290		)	—
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—			—		—			43,218			—			—			43,218			—			43,218			—
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense	—		—			—		—			635			—			—			635			—			635			—
Repurchase of common stock	(4,135	)	(4		)	—		—			(192,406		)	—			—			(192,410		)	—			(192,410		)	—
Tax benefit / (deficiency) from stock incentive plans	—		—			—		—			6,015			—			—			6,015			—			6,015			—
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans	1,079		1			—		—			26,786			—			—			26,787			—			26,787			—
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted stock	(86	)	—			—		—			(4,599		)	—			—			(4,599		)	—			(4,599		)	—
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock	2,147		2			(2,147	)	(2		)	—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Exercise of Class B stock options	—		—			479		1			1,130			—			—			1,131			—			1,131			—
Balance at September 30, 2011	51,861		52			57,560		58			210,681			1,445,189			7,533			1,663,513			21,837			1,685,350			310,184
Net income	—		—			—		—			—			264,302			—			264,302			832			265,134			265,134
Translation adjustments, net of taxes of $30	—		—			—		—			—			—			2,774			2,774			308			3,082			3,082
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $(210)	—		—			—		—			—			—			380			380			—			380			380
Distributions to controlling interest	—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			(13		)	(13		)	—
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—			—		—			47,184			—			—			47,184			—			47,184			—
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense	—		—			—		—			352			—			—			352			—			352			—
Repurchase of common stock	(7,213	)	(7		)	—		—			(268,184		)	(12		)	—			(268,203		)	—			(268,203		)	—
Tax benefit / (deficiency) from stock incentive plans	—		—			—		—			(3,585		)	—			—			(3,585		)	—			(3,585		)	—
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans	911		—			—		—			17,279			—			—			17,279			—			17,279			—
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted stock	(106	)	—			—		—			(3,835		)	—			—			(3,835		)	—			(3,835		)	—
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock	1,044		1			(1,044	)	(1		)	—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Exercise of Class B stock options	—		—			83		—			108						—			108			—			108			—
Balance at September 28, 2012	46,497		$	46		56,599		$	57		$	—		$	1,709,479		$	10,687		$	1,720,269		$	22,964		$	1,743,233		$	268,596

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

51

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
Operating activities:
Net income including controlling interest	$	265,134		$	310,582		$	282,827
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	43,876			43,994			34,937
Stock-based compensation expense	47,581			43,665			28,815
Amortization of premium on investments	17,140			17,088			9,118
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock	(852		)	(6,593		)	(24,639		)
Provision for doubtful accounts	(379		)	772			365
Losses / (gains) on Put Rights	—			—			7,601
Losses / (gains) on auction rate certificates	—			—			(7,601		)
Deferred taxes	1,208			6,784			(16,031		)
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	275			226			12,986
Payment on litigation settlement	—			(3,000		)	(3,000		)
Other non-cash items affecting net income	95			532			347
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	18,831			(8,514		)	(31,329		)
Inventories	3,051			2,105			(15,696		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(4,108		)	(10,305		)	15,009
Accounts payable and other liabilities	(6,641		)	(16,952		)	31,556
Income taxes, net	3,866			708			27,995
Deferred revenue	(498		)	19,800			(25,725		)
Other non-current liabilities	1,218			2,796			(237		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	389,797			403,688			327,298
Investing activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities	(611,211		)	(619,238		)	(646,052		)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities	358,142			225,977			504,438
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities	236,535			203,704			139,005
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(167,349		)	(47,362		)	(37,482		)
Purchases of intangible assets	(350		)	—			(825		)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(12,521		)	(3,350		)	(5,601		)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale	2,075			3,567			2,160
Net cash used in investing activities	(194,679		)	(236,702		)	(44,357		)
Financing activities:
Payments on debt	(518		)	—			(7,680		)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	17,386			27,918			42,398
Repurchase of common stock	(268,203		)	(192,410		)	(241,362		)
Excess tax benefit from the exercise of stock options	852			6,593			24,639
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted stock	(3,835		)	(4,599		)	(2,769		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(254,318		)	(162,498		)	(184,774		)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	288			1,163			(3,984		)
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(58,912		)	5,651			94,183
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	551,512			545,861			451,678
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	492,600		$	551,512		$	545,861
Supplemental disclosure:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	98,497		$	122,531		$	141,800
Cash paid for interest	$	133		$	375		$	671
Non-cash investing activities:
Purchase consideration payable for acquisition	$	6,038		$	—		$	—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

52

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Presentation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dolby Laboratories and our wholly owned subsidiaries. In addition, we have consolidated the financial results of jointly owned affiliated companies in which our principal stockholder has a controlling interest. We report these controlling interests as a separate line in our consolidated statements of operations as net (income) / loss attributable to controlling interest and in our consolidated balance sheets as controlling interest. We eliminate all intercompany accounts and transactions upon consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include estimated selling prices for elements sold in multiple-element revenue arrangements, valuation allowances for accounts receivable, carrying values of inventories and certain property, plant, and equipment, products provided under operating leases, goodwill, intangible assets, stock-based compensation, fair values of investments, accrued expenses, including liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, and deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year is a 52 or 53 week period ending on the last Friday in September. The fiscal years presented herein include the 52 week periods ended September 28, 2012 (fiscal 2012) and September 24, 2010 (fiscal 2010) and the 53 week period ended September 30, 2011 (fiscal 2011).

Reclassifications

We have reclassified certain prior year amounts within our consolidated statements of stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and within investing and financing activities of our consolidated statements of cash flows to conform to our current year presentation. These reclassifications did not affect total revenue, operating income, operating cash flows, or net income.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Concentration of Credit Risk

Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash, cash equivalents, investments, and accounts receivable. Our investment portfolio consists of investment grade securities diversified amongst security types, industries, and issuers. All our securities are held in custody by a recognized financial institution. Our policy limits the amount of credit exposure to maximum of 5% to any one issuer, except for the U.S. Treasury, and we believe no significant concentration risk exists with respect to these investments. Our products are sold to businesses primarily in the Americas and Europe, and the majority of our licensing revenue is generated from customers outside of the U.S. We manage this risk by evaluating in advance the financial condition and creditworthiness of our products and services customers and performing regular evaluations of the creditworthiness of our licensing customers. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and fiscal 2010, one customer accounted for approximately 14%, 13%, and 12%, respectively, of our total revenue.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of funds held in general checking accounts, money market accounts, commercial paper, and U.S. agency notes.

Investments

All of our investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, with the exception of our investments held in our supplemental retirement plan, which are classified as trading. Investments that have an original maturity of 91 days or more at the date of purchase and a current maturity of less than one year are classified as short-term investments, while investments with a current maturity of more than one year are classified as long-term investments. Our investments are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale securities are reported as a

53

component of accumulated other comprehensive income, while realized gains and losses, other-than-temporary impairments, and credit losses are reported as a component of net income.

We evaluate our investment portfolio for credit losses and other-than-temporary impairments by comparing the fair value with the cost basis for each of our investment securities. An investment is impaired if the fair value is less than its cost basis. If any portion of the impairment is deemed to be the result of a credit loss, the credit loss portion of the impairment is included as a component of net income. If we deem it probable that we will not recover the full cost basis of the security, the security is other-than-temporarily impaired and the impairment loss is recognized as a component of net income.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We continually monitor customer payments and maintain a reserve for estimated losses resulting from our customers’ inability to make required payments. In determining the reserve, we evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based upon a variety of factors. In cases where we are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations, we record a specific allowance against amounts due, and thereby reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably believed to be collectible. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on our actual historical write-off experience in conjunction with the length of time the receivables are past due, customer creditworthiness, geographic risk, and the current business environment. Actual future losses from uncollectible accounts may differ from our estimates.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market (net realizable value). We evaluate our ending inventories for estimated excess quantities and obsolescence. Our evaluation includes the analysis of future sales demand by product within specific time horizons. Inventories in excess of projected future demand are written down to net realizable value. In addition, we assess the impact of changing technology on our inventory balances and write off inventories that are considered obsolete. Write-downs of inventory are recorded as a cost of products.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method based on estimated useful lives as follows:

Systems and software	3 to 5 years
Machinery and equipment	3 to 8 years
Furniture and fixtures	5 to 8 years
Leasehold improvements	Lesser of useful life or related lease term
Buildings	Up to 40 years

Internal Use Software

We account for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use by capitalizing costs of materials, consultants, personnel and personnel-related costs incurred in developing internal use computer software. These costs are included in property, plant and equipment, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages are charged to expense. Our capitalized internal use software costs are typically amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of three to five years.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Long-Lived Assets

We test goodwill for impairment annually during our third fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 which amends the rules for testing goodwill for impairment. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-08 for our annual goodwill impairment test performed in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

In performing the qualitative assessments, we consider events and circumstances, including but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, changes in management or key personnel, changes in strategy, changes in customers, changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting unit's net assets and changes in the price of our common stock. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, then the two-step goodwill impairment test is not performed.

54

If the two-step goodwill test is performed, we evaluate and test our goodwill for impairment at a reporting-unit level using expected future cash flows to be generated by the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill over the calculated fair value of the goodwill. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below. Our operating segments are aligned with the management principles of our business.

We completed our annual goodwill impairment assessment in the fiscal quarter ended June 29, 2012. At the time of our annual goodwill impairment test for fiscal 2012, we had two reporting units: Via, which corresponds to our wholly owned subsidiary and has no assigned goodwill, and Dolby Entertainment Technology ("DET"), with goodwill of $263.5 million. We determined, after assessing the totality of the events and circumstances described above, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount. Accordingly, there was no indication of impairment and the two-step goodwill impairment test was not performed. We did not recognize any goodwill impairment losses in fiscal 2012, 2011, or 2010.

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Our intangible assets principally consist of acquired technology, patents, trademarks, customer relationships, and contracts, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives ranging from two to seventeen years.

We review long-lived assets, including intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or a change in circumstances indicate an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparing its carrying value to the total future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If it is determined that an asset is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. See Note 3 “Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions” for a discussion of impairment charges recognized in fiscal 2010.

Revenue Recognition

We enter into revenue arrangements with our customers to license technology, trademarks, and know-how and to sell products and services. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Judgment is required to assess whether collectibility is probable. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of our customer's recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter of credit between the customer's financial institution and our financial institution, and other factors. Some of our revenue arrangements include multiple elements, such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services.

Multiple Element Arrangements. We evaluate each element in a multiple element (“ME”) arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value and delivery of an undelivered element is both probable and within our control. When these criteria are not met, the delivered and undelivered elements are combined and the arrangement fees are allocated to this combined single unit.

If the unit separation criteria are met, we account for each element within a ME arrangement (such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services) separately, and we allocate fees from the arrangement based on the relative selling price of each element. For some arrangements, customers receive certain elements over a period of time, after delivery of the initial product. These elements may include support and maintenance and/or the right to receive upgrades. Revenue allocated to the undelivered element is recognized either over its estimated service period or when the upgrade is delivered. We do not recognize revenue that is contingent upon the future delivery of products or services or upon future performance obligations. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when we have completed all contractual obligations.

We determine our best estimate of the selling price for an individual element within a ME revenue arrangement using the same methods used to determine the selling price of an element sold on a standalone basis. If we sell the element on a standalone basis, we estimate the selling price by considering actual sales prices. Otherwise, we estimate the selling price by considering internal factors such as pricing practices and margin objectives. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies, customer demands, and industry technology lifecycles. Management applies judgment to establish margin objectives, pricing strategies, and technology lifecycles.

Revenue recognition for transactions which involve software, such as fees we earn from certain system licensees, requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for those elements. For some of our ME arrangements, customers receive certain elements of the arrangement over a period of time or after delivery of the initial software. These elements may include support and maintenance. The fair values of these elements are recognized over the estimated period for which these elements will be delivered, which is sometimes the estimated life of the software. If we do not have VSOE of fair value for any undelivered element included in these ME arrangements for software, we defer revenue until all elements are delivered and/or services have been performed, or until we have VSOE of fair value for all remaining undelivered elements. If the undelivered

55

element is support and we do not have fair value for the support element, revenue for the entire arrangement is bundled and recognized ratably over the support period.

For ME arrangements containing both software and hardware, we allocate the arrangement fees to each element based on its relative selling price, which we establish using a selling price hierarchy. We determine the selling price of each element based on its VSOE, if available, third-party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.

We account for the majority of our digital cinema server sales as ME arrangements that may include up to three separate units, or elements, of accounting. The first element consists of our digital cinema server hardware and the accompanying software, which is essential to the functionality of the hardware. This element is typically delivered at the time of sale. The second element is the right to receive support and maintenance, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered over a service period subsequent to the initial sale. The third element is the right to receive specified upgrades, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered when a specified upgrade is available, subsequent to the initial sale. The application of the new revenue accounting standards to our digital cinema server sales typically results in the allocation of a substantial majority of the arrangement fees to the delivered hardware element based on its ESP, relative to the VSOE or ESP of the other elements, which we recognize as revenue at the time of sale. A small portion of the arrangement fees are allocated to the undelivered support and maintenance element, and in some cases to the undelivered specified upgrade element, based on the VSOE or ESP of each element. The portion of the arrangement fees allocated to the support and maintenance element is recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated service period, and the portion of the arrangement fees allocated to specified upgrades is recognized as revenue upon delivery of the upgrade.

Licensing. Our licensing revenue is primarily derived from royalties paid to us by licensees of our intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, and know-how. Royalties are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria have been met. We determine that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement upon the execution of a license agreement or upon the receipt of a licensee’s royalty report and payment. Royalties are deemed fixed or determinable upon verification of a licensee’s royalty report in accordance with the terms of the underlying executed agreement, or in certain circumstances, receipt of a licensee’s royalty report. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of the licensee’s recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter-of-credit between the licensee’s financial institution and our financial institution, and other factors. If we cannot determine that collectibility is probable, we recognize revenue upon receipt of cash, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Corrective royalty statements generally comprise less than 1% of our net licensing revenue and are recognized when received, or earlier if a reliable estimate can be made of an anticipated reduction in revenue from a prior royalty statement. An estimate of anticipated reduction in revenue based on historical negative correction royalty statements is also recorded. Deferred revenue represents amounts that are ultimately expected to be recognized as revenue, but for which not all revenue recognition criteria have been met. Licensing revenue includes fees we earn for administering joint patent licensing programs (“patent pools”) containing patents owned by us and/or other companies. Royalties related to patent pools are recorded net of royalties payable to third party patent pool members and are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria have been met.

We generate the majority of our licensing revenue through our licensing contracts with original equipment manufacturers (system licensees) and software vendors. Our revenue recognition policies for each of these arrangements are summarized below.

Licensing to system licensees. We license our technologies to system licensees who manufacture consumer electronics products and, in return, the system licensee pays us a royalty generally for each unit shipped that incorporates our technologies. Royalties from system licensees are generally recognized upon receipt of a royalty report from the licensee and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. In certain cases, our arrangements require the licensee to pay up-front, non-refundable royalties for units they may distribute in the future. These up-front arrangements are generally recognized upon contract execution, unless the arrangement includes extended payment terms or is considered a multiple element arrangement. In addition, in some cases we receive initial license fees for our technologies and provide post-contract support. In these cases we recognize the initial fees ratably over the expected support term.

Licensing to software vendors. We license our technologies for resale to software vendors and, in return, the software vendor pays us a royalty for each unit of software distributed that incorporates our technologies. Royalties from software vendors are generally recognized upon receipt of a royalty report from the licensee and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. In addition, in some cases we receive initial license fees for our technologies and provide post-contract upgrades and support. In these cases, we recognize the initial fees ratably over the expected support term, as vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value typically does not exist for the upgrade and support elements of the contract.

Product Sales. Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when the risk of ownership has transferred to our customer, as provided under the terms of the governing purchase agreement, and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Generally, these purchase agreements provide that the risk of ownership is transferred to the customer when the product is shipped, except in specific instances in which certain foreign regulations stipulate that the risk of ownership is

56

transferred to the customer upon their receipt of the shipment. In these instances we recognize revenue when the product is received by the customer.

Services. Services revenues are recognized as completed and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of licensing. Cost of licensing primarily consists of amortization expenses associated with purchased intangible assets and intangible assets acquired in business combinations. Cost of licensing also includes royalty obligations to third parties for the licensing of intellectual property rights that we sublicense as part of our licensing arrangements with our customers.

Cost of products. Cost of products primarily consists of the cost of materials related to products sold, applied labor, and manufacturing overhead. Our cost of products also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then include in our products.

Cost of services. Cost of services primarily consists of the personnel and personnel-related costs of employees performing our professional services, the cost of outside consultants, and reimbursable expenses incurred on behalf of customers.

Stock-Based Compensation

We measure expenses associated with all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair-value method and record such expense in our consolidated financial statements on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. See Note 6 “Stockholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation” for further discussion.

Advertising and Promotional Costs

Advertising and promotional costs are charged to sales and marketing expense as incurred. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, these expenses were $20.0 million, $13.6 million, and $14.6 million, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation

We maintain sales, marketing, and business operations in foreign countries. We translate the assets and liabilities of our international non-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period. Revenue and expenses of these subsidiaries are translated using the average rates for the period. Gains and losses from these translations are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

Certain of our foreign subsidiaries transact in currencies other than their functional currency. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, we re-measure non-functional currency assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries using the exchange rate at the end of each period and recognize gains and losses in our consolidated statements of operations. These gains and losses are recorded within other income. In fiscal 2012 and 2011, transaction and re-measurement gains included in net income were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, while fiscal 2010 transaction and re-measurement losses included in net income were $1.9 million.

Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method, under which deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwards are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be reversed. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is additionally dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets when uncertainty regarding their realizability exists.

We record an unrecognized tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. We include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within our provision for income taxes. To the extent accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued are reduced in the period that such determination is made and are reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.

In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, we initiated a policy to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our undistributed earnings in certain foreign subsidiaries. See Note 8 “Income Taxes” for further discussion.

57

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that (1) eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity; (2) requires the consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income; and (3) requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income to net income. This new standard does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income, nor does it affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. The new standard is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. This standard will result only in changes in our financial statement presentation.

3. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments

Cash, cash equivalents, and investments as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011 consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash	$	468,622	$	394,474
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	17,090		142,038
U.S. agency securities	—		15,000
Commercial paper	4,885		—
Municipal debt securities	2,003		—
Total cash and cash equivalents	492,600		551,512
Short-term investments:
U.S. agency securities	3,999		8,074
Commercial paper	19,414		—
Corporate bonds	107,243		52,645
Municipal debt securities	172,037		330,562
Total short-term investments	302,693		391,281
Long-term investments (1):
U.S. agency securities	21,013		6,845
Corporate bonds	112,993		124,313
Municipal debt securities	227,608		141,639
Total long-term investments	361,614		272,797
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments	$	1,156,907	$	1,215,590

(1) Our long-term investments have maturities that range from one to three years.

58

Our investment portfolio, which is recorded as cash equivalents, short-term investments, and long-term investments, consists of the following:

	September 28, 2012
	Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Corporate bonds	$	219,265	$	990	$	(19	)	$	220,236
Money market funds	17,090		—		—			17,090
Municipal debt securities	400,958		728		(38		)	401,648
U.S. agency securities	24,997		18		(3		)	25,012
Commercial paper	24,299		—		—			24,299
Cash equivalents and investments	$	686,609	$	1,736	$	(60	)	$	688,285
	September 30, 2011
	Cost		Unrealized  Gain		Unrealized  Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Corporate bonds	$	177,129	$	316	$	(487	)	$	176,958
Money market funds	142,038		—		—			142,038
Municipal debt securities	471,005		1,251		(55		)	472,201
U.S. agency securities	29,858		65		(4		)	29,919
Cash equivalents and investments	$	820,030	$	1,632	$	(546	)	$	821,116

We have classified all of our investments listed in the tables above as available-for-sale securities recorded at fair market value in our consolidated balance sheets, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Upon sale, amounts of gains and losses reclassified into earnings are determined based on specific identification of securities sold.

The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and the fair value for those available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position:

	September 28, 2012
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
U.S. agency securities	$	6,999	$	(3	)	$	—	$	—		$	6,999	$	(3	)
Municipal debt securities	87,705		(37		)	5,565		(1		)	93,270		(38		)
Corporate bonds	25,277		(19		)	—		—			25,277		(19		)
Total	$	119,981	$	(59	)	$	5,565	$	(1	)	$	125,546	$	(60	)
	September 30, 2011
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
U.S. agency securities	$	3,997	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,997	$	(4	)
Municipal debt securities	79,466		(52		)	2,081		(3		)	81,547		(55		)
Corporate bonds	87,613		(487		)	—		—			87,613		(487		)
Total	$	171,076	$	(543	)	$	2,081	$	(3	)	$	173,157	$	(546	)

The unrealized losses on our available-for-sale securities were primarily a result of unfavorable changes in interest rates subsequent to the initial purchase of these securities. As of September 28, 2012, we had certain securities that were in an

59

unrealized loss position. We do not intend to sell, nor will we need to sell, these securities before we recover the associated unrealized losses. We expect to recover the full carrying value of these securities. As a result, we do not consider any portion of the unrealized losses at September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011 to be an other-than-temporary impairment, nor do we consider any of the unrealized losses to be credit losses.

The following tables summarize the amortized cost and estimated fair value of short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments based on stated maturities as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011:

	September 28, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	302,154	$	302,693
Due in 1 to 2 years	209,302		209,871
Due in 2 to 3 years	151,174		151,743
Total	$	662,630	$	664,307

	September 30, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	390,559	$	391,281
Due in 1 to 2 years	213,487		213,921
Due in 2 to 3 years	58,947		58,876
Total	$	662,993	$	664,078

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consists of the following:

	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Trade accounts receivable	$	43,565		$	59,831
Accounts receivable related to patent administration program	886			4,450
Accounts receivable, gross	44,451			64,281
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts	(956		)	(2,466		)
Accounts receivable, net	$	43,495		$	61,815

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	Balance at Beginning of Fiscal Year		Charged to Operations			Deductions			Balance at End of Fiscal Year
	(in thousands)
For fiscal year ended September 24, 2010	$	2,222	$	365		$	(547	)	$	2,040
For fiscal year ended September 30, 2011	2,040		772			(346		)	2,466
For fiscal year ended September 28, 2012	2,466		(379		)	(1,131		)	956

60

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Raw materials	$	4,403	$	10,821
Work in process	—		2,942
Finished goods	12,297		12,481
Inventories	$	16,700	$	26,244

We have included $6.5 million of raw materials inventory within other non-current assets in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 28, 2012. This inventory was purchased in bulk in fiscal 2012 to obtain a significant volume discount, and is expected to be consumed over a period that exceeds 12 months. We have reviewed anticipated consumption rates of this inventory and do not believe there to be material risk of obsolescence prior to the ultimate sale of the inventory. As a result, no valuation reserve has been recorded as of September 28, 2012. All inventory was classified as current as of September 30, 2011.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Prepaid assets	$	14,955	$	9,365
Other current assets	13,165		19,683
Income tax receivable	5,712		7,829
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	33,832	$	36,877

Other current assets include assets held for sale of $1.5 million as of September 30, 2011 representing digital cinema equipment that we leased to exhibitors beginning in fiscal 2005 in an effort to encourage the cinema industry to transition to digital cinema. The majority of these assets were sold in fiscal 2011, with the remainder sold during fiscal 2012.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Land	$	48,227		$	12,778
Buildings	27,266			26,623
Leasehold improvements	68,352			41,302
Machinery and equipment	29,070			20,845
Computer systems and software	86,266			62,897
Furniture and fixtures	13,158			10,113
Products provided under operating leases	—			1,060
Construction in progress	79,965			11,466
	352,304			187,084
Less: accumulated depreciation	(97,628		)	(69,977		)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	254,676		$	117,107

Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was $30.6 million, $24.1 million, and $17.8 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, and is included in cost of products, cost of services, research and development expenses, sales and marketing expenses, and general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of

61

operations.

In fiscal 2012, we purchased an approximately 354,000 square foot property in San Francisco, California for approximately $109.8 million. We allocated $35.5 million of the purchase price of the property to land and $74.3 million to building, based on a fair value analysis. This fair value analysis utilized a combination of an income approach and a cost approach in conjunction with a consideration of comparable transactions in the San Francisco marketplace. After making certain improvements to the property to prepare the building for our use, we intend to use the space as our worldwide headquarters. As of September 28, 2012, construction in progress includes the book value of the building and related costs of construction.

Our products provided under operating leases represent digital cinema equipment that we leased to exhibitors beginning in fiscal 2005 in an effort to encourage the cinema industry to transition to digital cinema. During fiscal 2010, certain events occurred that indicated that the carrying value of our products provided under operating leases may not be recoverable. These events included a reduction in expected virtual print fees and a reduction in market prices for digital cinema equipment. As a result, we concluded that sufficient indicators existed to require an impairment analysis during fiscal 2010.

Based on our estimates of the undiscounted future cash flows from virtual print fees and the potential sale value of the equipment, our analysis determined that the equipment was impaired. Accordingly, we estimated the fair market value of the equipment based on potential sale price estimates and recorded the excess of the carrying value over the fair market value as an impairment charge. During fiscal 2010, we recorded an impairment charge of $9.6 million related to our products provided under operating leases, which is included in the impairment of products provided under operating leases line item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

During fiscal 2010, management committed to a plan to sell one of our properties in the U.K. that indicated that the carrying value of the land and building may not be recoverable. Based on our estimates of the undiscounted future cash flows from this building, our analysis determined that the building was impaired. Accordingly, we estimated the fair market value of the property based on potential sales price estimates. We recorded the excess of the carrying value over the fair market value of the land and building as impairment charges of $1.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, within the restructuring charges line item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The building is held by an entity where we are the managing member and our principal stockholder is the limited member, but with a majority ownership of the entity. Therefore, the impairment amount reflected in our restructuring charges line item for fiscal 2010 is offset by the share of the charge attributable to the limited member, or $1.7 million, in our net income attributable to controlling interest line item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The property did not meet the criteria for held for sale classification as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012							September 30, 2011
	Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net
	(in thousands)
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
Acquired patents and technology	$	79,213	$	(40,071	)	$	39,142	$	61,611	$	(32,146	)	$	29,465
Customer relationships	30,679		(16,386		)	14,293		30,748		(12,821		)	17,927
Customer contracts	—		—			—		6,063		(6,063		)	—
Other intangibles	20,925		(17,834		)	3,091		20,308		(16,127		)	4,181
Total	$	130,817	$	(74,291	)	$	56,526	$	118,730	$	(67,157	)	$	51,573

Amortization expense for our intangible assets was $13.2 million, $19.8 million, and $17.3 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, and is included in cost of licensing, cost of products, research and development, and sales and marketing expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

62

As of September 28, 2012, our expected annual amortization expense of our intangible assets in future periods is as follows:

	Amortization
Fiscal Year	Expense
	(in thousands)
2013	$	15,605
2014	13,473
2015	11,017
2016	8,849
2017	5,736
Thereafter	1,846
Total	$	56,526

The following table outlines changes to the carrying amount of goodwill:

	Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	264,580
Acquired goodwill	182
Translation adjustments	(1,502		)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	263,260
Acquired goodwill	15,988
Translation adjustments	2,127
Balance at September 28, 2012	$	281,375

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Accrued royalties	$	2,391	$	1,947
Amounts payable to joint licensing program partners	35,492		42,502
Accrued compensation and benefits	47,331		41,168
Accrued professional fees	4,893		5,727
Other accrued liabilities	25,985		25,691
Accrued liabilities	$	116,092	$	117,035

Other Non-Current Liabilities

Other non-current liabilities consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Supplemental retirement plan obligations	$	2,042	$	1,811
Non-current tax liabilities	20,862		13,070
Other liabilities	16,933		8,574
Other non-current liabilities	$	39,837	$	23,455

63

See Note 8 “Income Taxes” for additional information related to tax liabilities.

Sales Tax

We account for sales tax on a net basis by excluding sales tax from our revenue.

Release of Value-Added Tax (“VAT”) Reserves

During fiscal 2011 we completed our analysis of recent VAT law changes enacted in the European Union and other foreign jurisdictions. Based on this analysis, we released $3.2 million of VAT reserves and related estimated penalties which were recorded as reductions of general and administrative expense. Additionally, we released $1.4 million of VAT-related interest reserves, which was recorded as a reduction of interest expense. These liabilities were previously included in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

Revenue from Material Customer

In the fiscal years ended September 28, 2012, September 30, 2011 and September 24, 2010 revenue from one customer was $126.7 million, $124.5 million and $113.3 million, respectively, or 14%, 13% and 12% of revenue for each fiscal year, respectively.

4. Acquisitions

On July 19, 2012, we acquired all outstanding shares of IMM Sound, S.A. (“IMM Sound”), a privately held company based in Barcelona, Spain, that develops and markets immersive 3D sound for the digital film industry. We believe that this technology complements our newly released Atmos technology. We accounted for the IMM Sound acquisition using the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. We completed the acquisition for a gross purchase price of $26.5 million, which included cash payments of $18.4 million, debt repayment of $0.6 million, and the assumption of net liabilities of $7.5 million. Purchase consideration, net of cash acquired of $0.4 million, was $18.0 million. Pursuant to the merger agreement, $6.0 million of the total purchase consideration is being held back by us for a period of twenty four months following the closing of the acquisition to satisfy certain indemnification obligations of IMM Sound's shareholders. This amount has been recorded as a non-current liability as of September 28, 2012.

The following table summarizes the allocation of total consideration to the total fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

	Total
	(in thousands)
Current assets	$	1,289
Property, plant and equipment, net	264
Intangible assets, net
Developed technology	12,649
Trade name	590
Goodwill	15,988
Current liabilities	(9,674		)
Deferred taxes, net	(2,721		)
Non-current liabilities	(22		)
Total purchase price	$	18,363

Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined by management based on information available at the date of acquisition. We are amortizing the acquired intangible assets over their estimated useful lives, which is five years for the developed technology and one year for the trade name. For tax purposes, a deferred tax liability of $3.2 million was recorded on the acquisition date for the difference between book and tax basis related to the acquired intangible assets. The value of acquired intangibles was determined based on the present value of estimated expected future cash flows. Goodwill resulted primarily from our expectation of synergies from the integration of IMM Sound technology with our existing technology and is not tax deductible. We incurred acquisition-related transaction costs of $0.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2012, which were included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

64

5. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We minimize the use of unobservable inputs and use observable market data, if available, when determining fair value. We classify our inputs to measure fair value using the following three-level hierarchy:

Level 1:    Quoted prices in active markets at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2:    Prices may be based upon quoted prices in active markets or inputs not quoted on active markets but are corroborated by market data.

Level 3:    Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available and reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of September 28, 2012 are classified below:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	2,140	$	—	$	—	$	2,140
Money market funds (2)	17,090		—		—		17,090
Commercial paper (2), (3)	—		24,299		—		24,299
Corporate bonds (3)	—		220,236		—		220,236
Municipal debt securities (2), (3)	—		401,648		—		401,648
U.S. agency securities (3)	25,012		—		—		25,012
Total	$	44,242	$	646,183	$	—	$	690,425

(1) These assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets and within other non-current assets.

(2) These assets are included within cash and cash equivalents.

(3) These assets are included within short-term investments and within long-term investments.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	2,140	$	—	$	—	$	2,140
Total	$	2,140	$	—	$	—	$	2,140

(1) These liabilities are included within accrued liabilities and within other non-current liabilities.

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of September 30, 2011 are classified below:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891
Money market funds (2)	142,038		—		—		142,038
Corporate bonds (3)	—		176,958		—		176,958
Municipal debt securities (3)	—		472,201		—		472,201
U.S. agency securities (2), (3)	29,919		—		—		29,919
Total	$	173,848	$	649,159	$	—	$	823,007

(1) These assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets and within other non-current assets.

(2) These assets are included within cash and cash equivalents.

(3) These assets are included within short-term investments and within long-term investments.

65

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891
Total	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891

(1) These liabilities are included within accrued liabilities and within other non-current liabilities.

We base the fair value of our Level 1 financial instruments, which are traded in active markets, using quoted market prices for identical instruments. Our Level 1 financial instruments include money market funds, U.S. agency securities, U.S. government bonds, and mutual fund investments held in our supplemental retirement plan.

We obtain the fair value of our Level 2 financial instruments from a professional pricing service, which may use quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments, or model driven valuations using observable market data or inputs corroborated by observable market data.

To validate the fair value determination provided by our primary pricing service, we perform quality controls over values received which include comparing our pricing service provider’s assessment of the fair values of our investment securities against the fair values of our investment securities obtained from another independent source, reviewing the pricing movement in the context of overall market trends, and reviewing trading information from our investment managers. In addition, we assess the inputs and methods used in determining the fair value in order to determine the classification of securities in the fair value hierarchy.

We did not own any Level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of September 28, 2012 or September 30, 2011.

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against assets and liabilities for which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure, in an effort to reduce the risk that our earnings will be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. These derivative instruments are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded to other income, net in our consolidated statements of operations. Our foreign currency forward contracts, which are not designated as hedging instruments, are used to reduce the exchange rate risk associated primarily with intercompany receivables and payables. These contracts do not subject us to material balance sheet risk due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these derivatives are intended to offset gains and losses on the related receivables and payables for which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure. As of September 28, 2012, the outstanding derivative instruments had maturities of 30 days or less and notional amounts of approximately $5.0 million. The fair values of these contracts were not material as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, and were included in accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

6. Stockholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation

Class A and Class B Common Stock

Our Board of Directors has authorized two classes of common stock, Class A and Class B. At September 28, 2012, we had authorized 500,000,000 Class A shares and 500,000,000 Class B shares. At September 28, 2012, we had 46,496,635 shares of Class A common stock and 56,598,829 shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding. Holders of our Class A and Class B common stock have identical rights, except that holders of our Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share. Shares of Class B common stock can be converted to shares of Class A common stock at any time at the option of the stockholder and automatically convert upon sale or transfer, except for certain transfers specified in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

Stock Incentive Plans

2000 Stock Incentive Plan.    Effective October 2000, we adopted the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, provides for the issuance of incentive and non-qualified stock options to employees, directors, and consultants of Dolby Laboratories to purchase up to 15.1 million shares of Class B common stock. Under the terms of this plan, options became exercisable as established by the Board of Directors (ratably over four years), and expire ten years after the date of the grant. Options granted under the plan were granted at not less than fair market value at the date of grant.

As of September 28, 2012, there were options outstanding to purchase 0.2 million shares of Class B common stock, of which all were vested and exercisable. The options outstanding have a remaining weighted-average contractual life of 1.7 years. Subsequent to fiscal 2005, no further options were granted under this plan. The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan terminated on October 1, 2010 and no shares of our common stock remained available for future issuance under that plan other than pursuant to outstanding options.

66

2005 Stock Plan.    In January 2005, our stockholders approved our 2005 Stock Plan, which our Board of Directors adopted in November 2004. The 2005 Stock Plan became effective on February 16, 2005, the day prior to the completion of our initial public offering. Our 2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated, provides for the ability to grant incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock units, performance units, performance bonus awards, and performance shares. A total of 21.0 million shares of our Class A common stock is authorized for issuance under the 2005 Stock Plan. For any awards granted prior to February 2011, any shares subject to an award with a per share price less than the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant and any shares subject to an outstanding restricted stock unit award will be counted against the authorized share reserve as two shares for every one share subject to the award, and if returned to the 2005 Stock Plan, such shares will be counted as two shares for every one share returned. For those awards granted from February 2011 onward, any shares subject to an award with a per share price less than the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant and any shares subject to an outstanding restricted stock unit award will be counted against the authorized share reserve as 1.6 shares for every one share subject to the award, and if returned to the 2005 Stock Plan, such shares will be counted as 1.6 shares for every one share returned.

As of September 28, 2012, there were options outstanding to purchase 4.4 million shares of Class A common stock, of which 1.7 million were vested and exercisable. The options outstanding have a remaining weighted-average contractual life of 7.8 years.

Stock-Based Compensation

We provide stock-based awards as a form of compensation for employees, officers, and directors. We have issued stock-based awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights under our equity incentive plans, as well as shares under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).

Stock-based compensation expense recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012 (2)			September 30, 2011 (2)			September 24, 2010 (2)
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation:
Stock options (1)	$	23,550		$	24,788		$	18,135
Restricted stock units	22,952			18,339			9,560
Employee stock purchase plan	1,029			842			673
Stock appreciation rights	50			(304		)	447
Total stock-based compensation	47,581			43,665			28,815
Benefit from income taxes	(14,930		)	(14,744		)	(9,805		)
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax	$	32,651		$	28,921		$	19,010

(1) Expense excludes $0.4 million in fiscal 2012, $0.6 million in fiscal 2011, and $0.8 million in fiscal 2010 related to stock-based compensation which was capitalized to property, plant and equipment.

(2) We also recognized $0.2 million, $0.3 million, and $1.2 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, of tax benefit from certain exercises of incentive stock options and shares issued under our ESPP, which is not included in the table above.

67

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation expense was classified as follows:
Cost of products	$	675	$	642	$	427
Cost of services	239		182		126
Research and development	11,553		10,157		6,535
Sales and marketing	16,233		13,184		8,843
General and administrative	18,881		19,500		12,884
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	47,581	$	43,665	$	28,815

Stock Options.    We have granted stock options to our employees, officers, and directors under our 2005 Stock Plan and our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. Stock options are generally granted at fair market value on the date of grant. Options granted to employees and officers prior to June 2008 generally vest over four years, with equal annual cliff-vesting and expire on the earlier of 10 years after the date of grant or 3 months after termination of service. Options granted to employees and officers from June 2008 onward generally vest over four years, with 25% of the shares subject to the option becoming exercisable on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the balance of the shares vesting in equal monthly installments over the following 36 months. These options expire on the earlier of 10 years after the date of grant or 3 months after termination of service. All options granted vest over the requisite service period and upon the exercise of stock options, we issue new shares of Class B common stock under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and new shares of Class A common stock under the 2005 Stock Plan. Our 2005 Stock Plan also allows us to grant stock awards which vest based on the satisfaction of specific performance criteria.

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of employee stock options at the date of grant. The fair value of our stock options was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
Expected term (in years)	4.53		4.40		4.66
Risk-free interest rate	0.7	%	1.5	%	2.2	%
Expected stock price volatility	43.8	%	41.4	%	41.7	%
Dividend yield	—		—		—

To determine an estimate for the expected term of our stock options, we evaluated historical exercise patterns of our employees and made an assumption regarding future exercise patterns. To determine an estimate for the expected stock price volatility, we used a blend of the historical volatility for our common stock since our initial public offering and our implied volatility. To determine an estimate for the risk-free interest rate we used an average interest rate based on U.S. Treasury instruments having terms consistent with the expected term of our awards.

The following table summarizes the weighted-average fair value of stock options granted and the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
Weighted-average fair value at date of grant	$	12.23	$	22.31	$	19.93
Intrinsic value of options exercised (in thousands)	6,188		46,649		79,453

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options is recognized net of estimated forfeitures. We determine our estimated forfeiture rate based on an evaluation of historical forfeitures. For awards granted in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, we used an estimated forfeiture rate of 6.13%, 6.10%, and 5.69%, respectively. Total unrecorded stock-based compensation cost at September 28, 2012 associated with employee stock options expected to vest was $54.1 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.

68

The following table summarizes information about stock options issued to officers, directors, and employees under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2005 Stock Plan:

	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)				(in years)	(in thousands)
Options outstanding at September 30, 2011	5,801		$	45.19
Grants	2,603		32.99
Exercises	(456	)	26.52
Forfeitures and cancellations	(3,326	)	55.83
Options outstanding at September 28, 2012	4,622		32.50		7.5	$	12,752
Options vested and expected to vest at September 28, 2012	4,437		32.43		7.5	12,577
Options exercisable at September 28, 2012	1,851		30.68		5.1	9,936

Aggregate intrinsic value is based on the closing price of our common stock on September 28, 2012 of $32.75 and excludes the impact of options that were not in-the-money.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 28, 2012:

	Outstanding Options				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Shares	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price
	(in thousands)	(in years)			(in thousands)
$1.26 - $1.26	12	0.1	$	1.26	12	$	1.26
$2.08 - $6.28	98	1.6	2.08		98	2.08
$6.29 - $19.21	238	2.5	15.43		238	15.43
$19.22 - 28.12	159	7.2	25.85		59	22.45
$28.13 - $38.20	3,368	8.0	31.89		1,092	31.48
$38.21 - $48.14	481	8.7	42.90		120	42.31
$48.15 - $51.18	117	5.5	48.22		115	48.19
$51.19 and above	149	7.8	57.36		117	56.31
	4,622				1,851

Restricted Stock Units.    We grant restricted stock units to certain employees, officers, and directors under our 2005 Stock Plan. Awards granted to employees and officers generally vest over four years, with equal annual cliff-vesting. Awards granted to directors prior to November 2010 generally vest over three years, with equal annual cliff-vesting. Awards granted after November 2010 to new directors vest over approximately two years, with 50% vesting per year, while awards granted from November 2010 onwards to ongoing directors vest over approximately one year. Our 2005 Stock Plan also allows us to grant restricted stock units which vest based on the satisfaction of specific performance criteria, although no such awards have been granted as of September 28, 2012. At each vesting date, the holder of the award is issued shares of our Class A common stock. Compensation expense from these awards is equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and is recognized over the requisite service period. No restricted stock units were granted prior to fiscal 2008. Total unrecorded stock-based compensation cost at September 28, 2012 associated with restricted stock units expected to vest was $57.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years. The fair value as of the respective vesting dates of restricted stock units was $14.2 million, $15.5 million and $10.3 million for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

69

The following table summarizes information about restricted stock units issued to officers, directors, and employees under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan:

	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Non-vested at September 30, 2011	946		$	53.71
Granted	2,157		33.91
Vested	(387	)	50.78
Forfeitures	(144	)	45.90
Non-vested at September 28, 2012	2,572		37.98

Stock Appreciation Rights.    We have granted stock appreciation rights to certain of our foreign employees. These awards are settled in cash rather than stock, and are classified as liability awards.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan.   Prior to May 2012, our ESPP allowed eligible employees to have up to 10 percent of their eligible compensation withheld and used to purchase Class A common stock, subject to a maximum of $25,000 worth of stock purchased in a calendar year or no more than 1,000 shares in an offering period, whichever is less. The plan provided for a discount equal to 15 percent of the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the last day of the purchase period.

As of May 15, 2012, the compensation committee of our Board of Directors amended the ESPP to provide for overlapping one-year offering periods composed of successive six-month purchase periods, with a look back feature to the Company's stock price at the commencement of a one-year offering period. The amended plan also includes an automatic reset feature that provides for an offering period to be reset and recommenced to a new lower-priced offering if the offering price of a new offering period is less than that of the immediately preceding offering period. The amended plan continues to allow eligible employees to have up to 10 percent of their eligible compensation withheld and used to purchase Class A common stock, subject to a maximum of $25,000 worth of stock purchased in a calendar year or no more than 1,000 shares in an offering period, whichever is less. The amendment is effective for the ESPP offering period which commenced in May 2012. The adoption of the amendment to the ESPP did not have a material impact on our results of operations.

Option Exchange Program

During our Annual Stockholder's Meeting held on February 7, 2012, our stockholders approved a one-time Employee Stock Option Exchange Program (the "Program") pursuant to which eligible employees were provided an opportunity to exchange, on a grant-by-grant basis, eligible outstanding stock options for a lesser number of new restricted stock units (“RSUs”), to be granted under our 2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated. Options eligible for the Program are those that were granted prior to the 12-month period preceding the start of the Program offering period, and have exercise prices per share that are greater than $45.83, which approximates the 52-week high of our per share stock price as of the start of the offering period. The Program offering period commenced on July 16, 2012 and closed on August 10, 2012, at which time, a total of 705 eligible option holder participants exchanged 2,665,986 outstanding stock options for 783,443 RSUs.

The Program was launched to restore the intended retention and incentive value of employee equity awards, reduce the potential dilutive effect of our equity incentive program, and reduce pressure to grant additional equity awards to employees in the short term. Participation in the Program was made available to all eligible employees and executive officers in eligible countries. The exchange of options under the Program resulted in a total incremental charge to compensation expense of $2.1 million. This incremental charge is being recognized over the vesting periods of the new RSUs, determined on a grant-by-grant basis, based on the extent to which the surrendered stock options were vested at the time of the exchange. These vesting periods range from one to four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant.

70

7. Restructuring

In fiscal 2011, we informed approximately 55 employees of our plans to reorganize certain aspects of our business under a strategic restructuring program. As a result of this action, we offered severance benefits to the affected employees. We recognized total severance and other associated costs of $0.4 million and $2.5 million for these affected employees in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. In addition, we recognized $0.4 million in facilities and contract termination costs in fiscal 2012. We also recognized $0.4 million and $0.2 million in fixed asset write-off costs related to this restructuring program in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. These expenses were recognized in restructuring charges, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In fiscal 2010, we informed approximately 60 general and administrative employees of our plans to reorganize certain aspects of our global business infrastructure. As a result of this action, we offered severance benefits to the affected employees. The majority of these employees were required to render service through November 15, 2010 to receive these severance benefits. We recognized the total severance and other associated costs of approximately $3.9 million for these employees on a ratable basis through termination dates for each employee. These expenses were recognized in restructuring charges, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In fiscal 2010, we also recorded $3.4 million of impairment within the restructuring charges line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to one of our buildings held in the UK. See Note 3 “Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions” for further information.

Changes in our restructuring accruals in fiscal 2012 and 2011, which were included within accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively, were as follows:

	Severance			Facilities and contract termination costs			Fixed assets write-off			Other associated costs			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	2,804		$	—		$	—		$	230		$	3,034
Restructuring charges	3,185			—			199			22			3,406
Cash payments	(3,716		)	—			—			(131		)	(3,847		)
Non-cash charges	(23		)	—			(199		)	(1		)	(223		)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	2,250		$	—		$	—		$	120		$	2,370
Restructuring charges	318			352			424			97			1,191
Cash payments	(2,572		)	(185		)	—			(201		)	(2,958		)
Non-cash charges	4			164			(424		)	(14		)	(270		)
Balance at September 28, 2012	$	—		$	331		$	—		$	2		$	333

71

8. Income Taxes

The components of our income before provision for income taxes are as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
U.S.	$	258,684	$	350,189	$	401,936
Foreign	110,307		90,454		35,076
Total	$	368,991	$	440,643	$	437,012

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Current:
Federal	$	56,105		$	71,336		$	109,050
State	2,922			18,069			18,382
Foreign	43,659			33,567			41,942
Total current	102,686			122,972			169,374
Deferred:
Federal	904			3,638			(12,790		)
State	521			9,756			(1,149		)
Foreign	(254		)	(6,305		)	(1,250		)
Total deferred	1,171			7,089			(15,189		)
Provision for income taxes	$	103,857		$	130,061		$	154,185

We recognize licensing revenue gross of withholding taxes, which our licensees remit directly to their local tax authorities, and for which we receive a related foreign tax credit in our income tax provision. Withholding taxes were $38.5 million, $32.2 million, and $31.6 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The foreign current tax includes this withholding tax expense and the appropriate foreign tax credit benefit is included in the current federal and foreign taxes.

In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, we initiated a policy to indefinitely reinvest a portion of the earnings of certain operations outside of the U.S. As a result, we have not provided deferred U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on undistributed earnings of approximately $162.2 million, which are permanently reinvested outside the U.S. Upon distribution of these earnings, we could be subject to both U.S. income taxes, adjusted for any foreign tax credits, and withholding taxes, estimated at approximately $48.3 million as of September 28, 2012.

In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, we also completed a restructuring of our international operations, which resulted in the release of a deferred tax liability of $11.0 million related to the amortization of an intangible asset from a prior year acquisition.

72

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A summary of the tax effects of the temporary differences is as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Deferred income tax assets:
Investments	$	2,096		$	1,932
Accounts receivable	182			417
Inventories	3,678			3,304
Net operating loss	2,863			2,987
U.S. state taxes	177			5,749
Accrued expenses	10,140			9,216
Stock-based compensation	25,720			19,547
Revenue recognition	63,843			67,154
Foreign tax credits	3,410			3,528
Other	7,338			6,040
Total gross deferred income tax assets	119,447			119,874
Less: valuation allowance	—			—
Total deferred income tax assets	119,447			119,874
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Translation adjustment	(904		)	(837		)
Intangibles	(3,746		)	(595		)
International earnings	(6,373		)	(1,485		)
Depreciation and amortization	(6,761		)	(11,422		)
Unrealized gain on investments	(768		)	(558		)
Deferred income tax assets, net	$	100,895		$	104,977
The above deferred income tax assets, net have been classified in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Current deferred income tax assets	$	80,956		$	90,869
Long-term deferred income tax assets, net	19,939			14,108
Deferred income tax assets, net	$	100,895		$	104,977

Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, we believe it is more likely than not that the benefits of these deductible differences will be realized; therefore, a valuation allowance is not required.

As part of our current acquisition in July 2012, we acquired a net operating loss carryover for Spain tax purposes of $1.7 million and will expire in fiscal 2030 if unused. As part of an acquisition in April 2009, we acquired net operating loss carryovers for federal and California tax purposes of $9.7 million and $9.6 million, respectively. The losses carried forward for federal and California tax purposes as of September 28, 2012 were $6.4 million and $9.6 million, respectively, and will expire in fiscal 2029 if unused. As of September 28, 2012, we had net operating loss carryovers for Australia tax purposes of $0.1 million which have no expiration date.

73

A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to our effective tax rate for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 is as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
Federal statutory rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
State income taxes, net of federal effect	1.1		4.7		3.2
Stock-based compensation expense rate	0.5		0.3		(0.1	)
Research and development tax credits	(1.1	)	(1.6	)	(0.8	)
Tax exempt interest	(0.3	)	(0.3	)	(0.4	)
U.S. manufacturing tax incentives	(2.1	)	(1.9	)	(1.8	)
Foreign rate differential	(5.3	)	(4.6	)	(0.1	)
Foreign reversal of deferred tax liabilities	—		(2.5	)	—
Other	0.3		0.4		0.2
Effective tax rate	28.1	%	29.5	%	35.2	%

Our policy to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our undistributed earnings in certain foreign subsidiaries with tax rates lower than those in the U.S. resulted in a reduction to our fiscal 2012 tax rate. We also benefited from a change in the State of California apportionment sourcing rules, which began to affect our current California taxes beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. These benefits were partially offset by the expiration of the federal research and development tax credits, beginning January 1, 2012, which resulted in an increase in our effective tax rate. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011 we obtained a tax ruling that will reduce our foreign tax liability for the current and future years. The tax ruling resulted in a release of certain deferred tax liabilities associated with a prior year acquisition in our foreign operations. In fiscal 2011 we expected a reduction in our California tax rate. As a result, in fiscal 2011 we reduced certain deferred tax assets, which increased our tax rate. Additionally, in the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, a change in the tax law retroactively reinstated the federal research and development tax credits for a portion of fiscal 2010. As a result, we recognized an increase in federal research and development tax credits for fiscal 2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, thereby further lowering our effective tax rate.

As of September 28, 2012, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $16.9 million, of which $10.9 million, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate. Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits is classified within other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

The aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were as follows:

	(in thousands)
Balance at September 25, 2009	$	16,916
Lapse of statute of limitations	(2,143		)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	—
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	520
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	1,265
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	16,558
Lapse of statute of limitations	(1,097		)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	(8,083		)
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	1,006
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	299
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	8,683
Lapse of statute of limitations	(1,236		)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	(493		)
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	3,156
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	6,770
Balance at September 28, 2012	$	16,880

74

To the extent accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued will be reduced in the period that such determination is made and are reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision. At September 28, 2012, we had $2.0 million of accrued interest and $1.9 million of accrued penalties on unrecognized tax benefits. At September 30, 2011, we had $2.0 million of accrued interest and $2.4 million of accrued penalties on unrecognized tax benefits. In fiscal 2012, our current tax provision was reduced by penalties of $0.5 million and increased by interest expense of $0.1 million.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. on a federal basis and in several U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. Our most significant tax jurisdictions are the U.S., the United Kingdom (U.K.), the Netherlands, and the state of California. Our tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. We are no longer subject to examinations by the Internal Revenue Service through the 2006 tax year, for U.S. federal tax purposes, and through the 2006 fiscal year by the appropriate governmental agencies for U.K. tax purposes. In addition, we are no longer subject to examination by the state of New York through the 2008 tax year for income tax purposes. Our California filings are no longer subject to examination through the 2004 tax year by the appropriate California agency. Other significant jurisdictions include Australia, Canada, and Sweden and they are no longer subject to examinations through the years 2003, 2006, and 2007, respectively. We do not believe that the outcome of any ongoing examination will have a material impact on our financial statements.

We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing income tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expected tolling of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions. Considering these facts, we do not currently believe there is a reasonable possibility of any significant change to our total unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

9. Retirement Plans

We maintain a tax-qualified 401(k) retirement plan for employees in the U.S. and similar plans in foreign jurisdictions. Retirement plan expenses were $12.9 million, $11.3 million, and $11.1 million for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Retirement plan expenses are included in cost of products, cost of services, sales and marketing, general and administrative, and research and development expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

The following table presents a summary of our contractual obligations and commitments as of September 28, 2012:

	Payments Due By Period
	Fiscal 2013		Fiscal 2014		Fiscal 2015		Fiscal 2016		Fiscal 2017		Thereafter		Total
	(in thousands)
Naming rights (1)	$	—	$	7,341	$	7,432	$	7,525	$	7,619	$	126,414	$	156,331
Operating leases (2)	13,751		10,860		7,840		5,897		4,111		5,981		48,440
Purchase obligations (3)	3,832		607		105		—		—		—		4,544
Total	$	17,583	$	18,808	$	15,377	$	13,422	$	11,730	$	132,395	$	209,315

(1) In April 2012, we entered into an agreement for naming rights and related benefits with respect to the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, California, the location of the Academy Awards®. In exchange for these rights and other benefits, we made one annual payment in fiscal 2012 and will subsequently make semi-annual payments over the term. Our payment obligations are conditioned in part on the Academy Awards® being held and broadcast from the Dolby Theatre. The term of the agreement is 20 years.

(2) Operating lease payments include future minimum rental commitments, including those payable to our principal stockholder and portions attributable to the controlling interests in our wholly owned subsidiaries, for non-cancelable operating leases of office space.

(3) Our purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services, entered into in the ordinary course of business. These represent non-cancelable commitments for which a penalty would be imposed if the agreement was canceled for any reason other than an event of default as described by the agreement.

Rental expenses under operating leases were $13.5 million, $12.6 million, and $8.7 million for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. These amounts include expenses for rent payable to our principal stockholder of $1.4 million, $1.4 million, and $1.4 million for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

We are party to certain contractual agreements under which we have agreed to provide indemnifications of varying scope and duration to the other party relating to our licensed intellectual property. Historically, we have made no payments for these indemnification obligations and no amounts have been accrued in our consolidated financial statements with respect to these obligations. Due to their varying terms and conditions, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount we could be required to pay.

75

11. Geographic Data

Operating Segments

We operate as a single reportable segment on an enterprise-wide basis. We generate revenue by licensing our technologies to manufacturers of CE products and software vendors and by selling our professional products and related services to entertainment content creators, producers, and distributors.

Geographic Information

Revenue by geographic region, which was determined based on the location of our licensees for licensing revenue, the location of our direct customers or distributors for products revenue, and the location where we perform our services for services revenue, was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
U.S.	$	298,592	$	301,868	$	318,127
International	627,672		653,637		604,586
Total revenue	$	926,264	$	955,505	$	922,713

The concentration of our revenue from individual geographic regions was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
U.S.	33	%	32	%	34	%
Japan	18	%	20	%	19	%
Europe	15	%	15	%	16	%
Taiwan	7	%	8	%	9	%
South Korea	17	%	13	%	12	%
China	6	%	6	%	5	%
Other	4	%	6	%	5	%

Long-lived tangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation, by geographic region were as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
U.S.	$	211,647	$	87,486
International	43,029		29,621
Total long-lived tangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation	$	254,676	$	117,107

76

12. Common Stock Repurchase Program

In November 2009, we announced a stock repurchase program, providing for the repurchase of up to $250.0 million of our Class A common stock. Our Board of Directors approved an additional $300.0 million for our stock repurchase program in July 2010, $250.0 million in July 2011, and an additional $100.0 million in February 2012, for a total authorization of up to $900.0 million in stock repurchases. Stock repurchases under this program may be made through open market transactions, negotiated purchases, or otherwise, at times and in amounts that we consider appropriate. The timing of repurchases and the number of shares repurchased depend upon a variety of factors, including price, regulatory requirements, the rate of dilution from our equity compensation programs, and other market conditions. We may limit, suspend, or terminate the stock repurchase program at any time without prior notice. This program does not have a specified expiration date. Shares repurchased under the program will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Class A common stock. As of September 28, 2012, the remaining authorization to purchase additional shares is $198.3 million.

Stock repurchase activity under the stock repurchase program during fiscal 2012 is summarized as follows:

	Shares Repurchased	Cost (in thousands) (1)		Average Price Paid per Share (2)
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended December 30, 2011	885,969	$	26,068	$	29.41
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012	1,575,891	$	60,081	$	38.11
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended June 29, 2012	2,545,699	$	103,810	$	40.76
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2012	2,205,433	$	78,244	$	35.46
Total	7,212,992	$	268,203

(1) Cost of share repurchases includes the price paid per share and applicable commissions.

(2) Excludes commission costs.

13. Legal Proceedings

In March 1997, an unrelated third party filed a lawsuit against us alleging breach of a written agreement. In April 2002, we settled the dispute and agreed to pay a total of $30.0 million, without interest, in ten equal annual installments of $3.0 million per year beginning in June 2002. We recorded this liability at its present value of $24.2 million on the consolidated balance sheet. Interest related to this liability is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Other than such payments, neither party has any material obligations as a result of the settlement. As of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, no amounts were due under this settlement.

During the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2011, we filed patent infringement lawsuits in the U.S. and in Germany against Research in Motion Ltd. (“RIM”), a previously unlicensed user of certain of our patented technologies. In July 2011, RIM signed a license agreement with Via Licensing Corporation (“Via”), our wholly-owned subsidiary and the licensing administrator for the patent pool which includes Dolby’s essential AAC patents, which entitled us to back royalties for Dolby technologies used in RIM’s products. Based on this license agreement, we recognized revenue of $15.2 million during fiscal 2011 for back royalties related to the Dolby patents and Via administration fees, including $11.3 million attributable to periods prior to fiscal 2011. We also received interest related to these back royalties of $2.2 million, which was recognized as interest income in fiscal 2011.

We are involved in various legal proceedings from time to time arising from the normal course of business activities, including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights, commercial, employment, and other matters. In our opinion, resolution of these pending matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our operating results or financial condition. Given the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could materially affect our future operating results or financial condition in a particular period; however, based on the information known by us as of the date of this filing and the rules and regulations applicable to the preparation of our financial statements, any such amount is either immaterial or it is not possible to provide an estimated amount of any such potential loss.

77

14. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income were as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Net income including controlling interest	$	265,134		$	310,582		$	282,827
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax	3,082			509			(1,290		)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax	380			(907		)	(622		)
Comprehensive income	268,596			310,184			280,915
Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to controlling interest	(1,140		)	(1,185		)	792
Comprehensive income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	267,456		$	308,999		$	281,707

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the following:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Accumulated foreign currency translation gains, net of tax of ($2,623) and ($2,653)	$	9,608	$	6,834
Accumulated unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($597) and ($387)	1,079		699
Total accumulated other comprehensive income	$	10,687	$	7,533

15. Related Party Transactions

We lease our primary San Francisco corporate offices from our principal stockholder. The current lease expires on December 31, 2013, but we have the option to renew the lease for two additional five-year terms. Related party rent expense included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2012 , 2011, and 2010 was $1.4 million, $1.4 million, and $1.4 million, respectively.

We are the managing member or general partner in entities which own and lease commercial property in the U.S. and United Kingdom. Our principal stockholder is the limited member or limited partner, but with a majority economic interest, in each of these entities. These entities were established for the purposes of purchasing and leasing commercial property primarily for our own use. While a portion of the property is leased to third parties, we occupy a majority of the space. Therefore, given that these affiliated entities are an integrated part of our operations, we have consolidated the entities’ assets and liabilities and results of operations in our consolidated financial statements. The share of earnings and net assets of the entities attributable to the limited member or limited partner, as the case may be, is reflected as controlling interest in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These entities distributed less than $0.1 million to our principal stockholder in fiscal 2012, and approximately $0.3 million and $0.3 million in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. During fiscal 2010, we paid off in full the debt used to finance the purchases of property.

Our ownership interest in the consolidated affiliated entities is as follows:

Company Name	Ownership interest as of September 28, 2012
Dolby Properties, LLC	37.5	%
Dolby Properties Brisbane, LLC	49.0	%
Dolby Properties Burbank, LLC	49.0	%
Dolby Properties United Kingdom, LLC	49.0	%
Dolby Properties, LP	10.0	%

78

16. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

	Fiscal Quarter Ended
	September 28, 2012		June 29, 2012		March 30, 2012		December 30, 2011		September 30, 2011		July 1, 2011		April 1, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
Licensing	$	191,154	$	178,436	$	225,349	$	199,624	$	205,747	$	181,790	$	214,627	$	188,176
Products	27,628		22,132		27,228		26,400		30,842		28,395		26,347		46,027
Services	5,973		7,304		7,682		7,354		7,179		8,814		9,052		8,509
Total revenue	224,755		207,872		260,259		233,378		243,768		218,999		250,026		242,712
Cost of revenue	26,994		21,031		23,592		20,410		25,642		27,933		28,457		29,139
Gross margin	197,761		186,841		236,667		212,968		218,126		191,066		221,569		213,573
Income before taxes and controlling interest	72,951		70,321		122,515		103,204		116,632		90,451		122,494		111,066
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	51,494	$	51,529	$	88,120	$	73,159	$	79,071	$	61,748	$	82,061	$	86,387
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.49	$	0.48	$	0.81	$	0.67	$	0.72	$	0.55	$	0.73	$	0.77
Diluted	$	0.49	$	0.48	$	0.81	$	0.67	$	0.71	$	0.55	$	0.72	$	0.76
Shares outstanding:
Basic	104,079		106,328		108,415		108,884		110,063		111,494		112,140		112,035
Diluted	104,915		107,202		109,170		109,443		110,662		112,349		113,346		113,713

17. Per Share Data

We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period. For diluted earnings per share, we divide net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding and the potential number of dilutive shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	264,302	$	309,267	$	283,447
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic	106,926		111,444		113,452
Potential common shares from options to purchase Class A and Class B common stock	493		941		1,769
Potential common shares from restricted stock units	122		169		167
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted	107,541		112,554		115,388
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.—basic	$	2.47	$	2.78	$	2.50
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.—diluted	$	2.46	$	2.75	$	2.46
Antidilutive options excluded from calculation	6,496		3,289		2,074
Antidilutive restricted stock units excluded from calculation	2,550		535		457

79

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Subject to the limitations noted above, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to meet the objective for which they were designed and operate at the reasonable assurance level.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2012 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in its Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment and those criteria, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 28, 2012.

Our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

80

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item concerning our directors, compliance with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our code of ethics and Nominating and Governance Committee and Audit Committee is incorporated by reference from the information set forth in the sections under the headings “Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Corporate Governance Matters” in our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2013 (the “2013 Proxy Statement”).

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Our executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The names of our executive officers and their ages, titles, and biographies as of November 2, 2012 are set forth below:

Executive Officers	Age	Position(s)
Kevin Yeaman	46	President and Chief Executive Officer
Lewis Chew	49	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Ramzi Haidamus	48	Executive Vice President, Marketing and Business Development
Michael Rockwell	45	Executive Vice President, Advanced Technology Group
Andy Sherman	45	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Michael Bergeron	55	Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Field Operations

Kevin Yeaman joined us as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President in October 2005 and became our President and CEO in March 2009. Prior to joining us, Mr. Yeaman worked for seven years at E.piphany, Inc., a publicly traded enterprise software company, most recently as Chief Financial Officer from August 1999 to October 2005. Previously, Mr. Yeaman served as Worldwide Vice President of Field Finance Operations for Informix Software, Inc., a provider of relational database software, from February 1998 to August 1998. From September 1988 to February 1998, Mr. Yeaman served in Silicon Valley and London in various positions at KPMG LLP, an accounting firm, serving most recently as a senior manager. Mr. Yeaman holds a B.S. degree in commerce from Santa Clara University.

Lewis Chew joined us as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2012. Mr. Chew leads the worldwide finance organization and is responsible for the financial and infrastructure support for our business, which includes all finance functions, information technology, real estate and facilities, procurement, and investor relations. Mr. Chew comes to us with decades of financial and strategic business management experience. Mr. Chew is the former Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of National Semiconductor Corporation, a manufacturer of electronic components, where he was responsible for all finance functions as well as information systems and investor relations. Prior to joining National Semiconductor, Mr. Lewis was a partner at KPMG LLP, an accounting firm, serving numerous technology and financial institution clients. Mr. Chew serves as a member of the Board of Directors at PG&E Corporation, an energy-based holding company. Mr. Chew holds a B.S. degree in accounting from Santa Clara University.

Ramzi Haidamus has served as our Executive Vice President, Marketing and Business Development, since August 2012. Previously, Mr. Haidamus served in a variety of other positions since joining us in 1996, including as our Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing, as the Senior Vice President and General Manager of our consumer division, as the President and General Manger of our wholly owned subsidiary, Via Licensing Corporation, and as our Director of Business Development, Technology and Business Strategist, and Licensing Manager. Prior to joining us, Mr. Haidamus worked at Stanford Research Systems for seven years. Mr. Haidamus holds a B.S. degree in electrical engineering and a M.S. degree in computer engineering from the University of the Pacific.

Michael Rockwelljoined us as our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Engineering in October 2007, was appointed our Executive Vice President, Products and Technology in March 2009, and appointed as our Executive Vice President, Advanced Technology Group, in August 2012. Prior to joining us, from October 2000 to August 2007, Mr. Rockwell was Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Avid Technology, Inc., a media software company. Prior to his appointment as Chief Technology Officer, from April 1994 to October 1999, Mr. Rockwell served as Chief Architect of Software Engineering at Digidesign, which was acquired by Avid Technology, Inc. in 1995. Before Digidesign, Mr. Rockwell was the president and owner of a software business and audio/visual production company, Rockwell Digital.

81

Andy Sherman joined us as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in January 2011. Prior to joining us, from June 2008 to January 2011, Mr. Sherman served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel at CBS Interactive, an online content network, where he led the legal group advising CBS’s online entertainment, mobile, technology, sports, news, games, lifestyle, and international business units. Mr. Sherman joined CBS Interactive following CBS’s acquisition of CNET Networks, an online content network, where from June 2007 to June 2008 he was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Before CNET, Mr. Sherman served as Vice President, Legal at Sybase, an enterprise software and services company, from November 2006 to May 2007, following Sybase’s acquisition of Mobile 365, where he was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to joining Mobile 365, he held senior legal positions with global responsibility at a variety of public technology companies including PeopleSoft and E.piphany. Earlier in his career, Mr. Sherman worked in private practice with Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich (now DLA Piper), focusing on the representation of emerging technology companies. Mr. Sherman holds a J.D. from the University of the Pacific, as well as a B.S. degree in business administration from the University of Southern California.

Michael Bergeron joined us as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Field Operations in April 2012. Prior to joining us, Mr. Bergeron worked from 2005 to 2012 at Adobe Systems, Inc., a software supplier of professional creative tools and enterprise software. Most recently Mr. Bergeron was Vice President of Worldwide OEM and Education Sales from October 2009 to April 2012, and prior to that was Vice President of Worldwide Mobile & Devices Sales & Business Development. From September 2000 to August 2005, Mr. Bergeron was Senior Vice President of Corporate Business Development at Macromedia, Inc., a software provider of web development software and servers, which was acquired by Adobe in 2005. Before Macromedia, Mr. Bergeron served from March 1996 to September 1998 as Vice President and Founder of Elemental Software, a provider of web development tools. Macromedia acquired Elemental software in 1998. Mr. Bergeron holds a B.S. degree in marketing from Indiana University.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item concerning executive compensation is incorporated by reference from the information in the 2013 Proxy Statement under the headings “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,” “Executive Compensation and Related Matters,” “Compensation of Directors” and “Corporate Governance Matters-Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.”

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans and security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from the information in the 2013 Proxy Statement under the headings “Executive Compensation and Related Matters—Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item concerning transactions with related persons and director independence is incorporated by reference from the information in the 2013 Proxy Statement under the headings “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and “Corporate Governance Matters.”

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information in the 2013 Proxy Statement under the heading “Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

1. Financial Statements: See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2. Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

82

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 15, 2012

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.
By:	/S/   LEWIS CHEW
	Lewis Chew
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Kevin J. Yeaman and Lewis Chew, and each of them, his attorney-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue of hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE	TITLE	DATE
/S/    PETER GOTCHER	Chairman of the Board of Directors	November 15, 2012
Peter Gotcher
/S/    KEVIN J. YEAMAN	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	November 15, 2012
Kevin J. Yeaman
/S/    LEWIS CHEW	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	November 15, 2012
Lewis Chew
/S/    DAVID DOLBY	Director	November 15, 2012
David Dolby
/S/    NICHOLAS DONATIELLO, JR.	Director	November 15, 2012
Nicholas Donatiello, Jr.
/S/    TED W. HALL	Director	November 15, 2012
Ted W. Hall
/S/    N.W. JASPER, JR.	Director	November 15, 2012
N. W. Jasper, Jr.
/S/    SANFORD ROBERTSON	Director	November 15, 2012
Sanford Robertson
/S/    ROGER SIBONI	Director	November 15, 2012
Roger Siboni
/S/    AVADIS TEVANIAN, JR.	Director	November 15, 2012
Avadis Tevanian, Jr.

83

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description	Incorporated by Reference Herein
		Form	Date
2.1*	Asset Contribution Agreement dated November 19, 2004, by and between the Registrant, Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation, Ray Dolby individually, Ray Dolby as Trustee for the Ray Dolby Trust under the Dolby Family Trust instrument dated May 7, 1999, and Ray and Dagmar Dolby Investments L.P.	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614), Amendment No. 1	December 30, 2004
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614), Amendment No. 2	January 19, 2005
3.2	Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	April 30, 2009
4.1	Form of Registrant’s Class A Common Stock Certificate	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614), Amendment No. 1	December 30, 2004
4.2	Form of Registrant’s Class B Common Stock Certificate	Registration Statement on Form 8-A	January 25, 2006
10.1*	Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between the Registrant and its Directors and Officers	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614)	November 19, 2004
10.2*	2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614), Amendment No. 3	January 31, 2005
10.3*	2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated	Annual Report on Form 10-K	November 23, 2011
10.4*	Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), as amended and restated
10.5*	2012 Dolby Executive Annual Incentive Plan	Current Report on Form 8-K/A	December 5, 2011
10.6*	Forms of Stock Option Agreements under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614)	November 19, 2004
10.7*	Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2005 Stock Plan	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	August 11, 2005
10.8*	Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2005 Stock Plan	Current Report on Form 8-K	June 17, 2005
10.9*	Form of Stock Option Agreement – International under the 2005 Stock Plan	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	February 3, 2012
10.10*	Form of Subscription Agreement under the ESPP - U.S. Employees	Annual Report on Form 10-K	November 19, 2009
10.11*	Form of Subscription Agreement under the ESPP - Non-U.S. Employees	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	August 8, 2012

84

Exhibit Number	Description	Incorporated by Reference Herein
		Form	Date
10.12*	At-Will Employment, Proprietary Rights, Non-Disclosure and No Conflicts-of-Interest Agreement, dated November 19, 2004, by and between Ray Dolby and Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614), Amendment No. 1	December 30, 2004
10.13*	Employment Agreement dated February 24, 2009, by and between Dolby Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Kevin Yeaman	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	April 30, 2009
10.14*	Services Agreement by and between Peter Gotcher and Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	May 10, 2011
10.15*	Offer Letter dated April 21, 2009, by and between Murray J. Demo and Dolby Laboratories, Inc., a California corporation	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	July 30, 2009
10.16*	Lease for 100 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	February 8, 2006
10.17*	First Amendment to Lease for 100 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	May 4, 2006
10.18*	Lease for 130 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	February 8, 2006
10.19*	Lease for 140 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	February 8, 2006
10.20*	Lease for 999 Brannan Street, San Francisco, California	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614)	November 19, 2004
10.21*	Lease for 175 South Hill Drive, Brisbane, California	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614)	November 19, 2004
10.22*	Lease for 3601 West Alameda Avenue, Burbank, California	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614)	November 19, 2004
10.23*	Lease for Wootton Bassett, England facility	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614)	November 19, 2004
10.24*	Lease for Interface Business Park, Bincknoll Lane, Wootton Bassett, Wiltshire	Annual Report on Form 10-K	November 22, 2010

85

Exhibit Number	Description	Incorporated by Reference Herein
		Form	Date
10.25*	License to Carry Out Work Relating to Premises at Interface Business Park, Bincknoll Lane, Wootton Bassett, Wiltshire	Annual Report on Form 10-K	November 22, 2010
10.26†	License Agreement effective January 1, 1992 by and between GTE Laboratories Incorporated and Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation	Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-120614), Amendment No. 1	December 30, 2004
10.27	Amendment No. 2 to the License Agreement effective January 1, 1992 by and between GTE Laboratories Incorporated (now known as Verizon Corporate Services Corp.) and Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	February 4, 2009
10.28*	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement—U.S. under the 2005 Stock Plan	Current Report on Form 8-K	November 20, 2007
10.29*	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement—U.K. under the 2005 Stock Plan	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	April 30, 2009
10.30*	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement—Non-U.S. under the 2005 Stock Plan	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	February 3, 2012
10.31*	Letter Agreement dated December 4, 2010, by and between Dolby Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Ray Dolby	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	February 9, 2011
10.32*	Offer letter by and between Andy Sherman and Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	May 10, 2011
10.33*	Consulting Agreement by and between David Dolby and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. dated February 2, 2011	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	May 10, 2011
10.34*	Consulting Agreement by and between David Dolby and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. dated February 7,2012	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	May 8, 2012
10.35*	Summary of Murray Demo Fiscal 2012 Cash Incentive Arrangement	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	May 8, 2012
10.36*	Offer Letter dated March 22, 2012, by and between Lewis Chew and Dolby Laboratories, Inc	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	May 8, 2012
10.37	Agreement of Sale and Purchase by and between DWF III 1275 Market, LLC and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. dated June 8, 2012	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q	August 8, 2012
10.38*	Offer Letter dated March 2, 2012, by and between Michael Bergeron and Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
21.1	List of significant subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1	Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
24.1	Power of Attorney (incorporated by reference from the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

86

Exhibit Number	Description	Incorporated by Reference Herein
		Form	Date
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32.1‡	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101.INS‡	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH‡	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL‡	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF‡	XBRL Extension Definition
101.LAB‡	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE‡	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

† Confidential treatment has been granted for portions of this exhibit.

‡ Furnished herewith

87

EX-10.4

DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Exhibit 10.4

Adopted Effective February 16, 2005

Amended and Restated on October 13, 2005

Amended and Restated on February 5, 2008

Amended and Restated on November 4, 2008; Effective May 18, 2009

Amended and Restated on November 7, 2011; Effective May 15, 2012

Amended and Restated on September 25, 2012; Effective November 15, 2012

1.Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to provide employees of the Company and its Designated Subsidiaries and Designated Affiliates with an opportunity to purchase Common Stock of the Company. This Plan includes two components: a Code Section 423 Component (the “423 Component”) and a non-Code Section 423 Component (the “Non-423 Component”). It is the intention of the Company to have the 423 Component qualify as an “Employee Stock Purchase Plan” under Section 423 of the Code. The provisions of the 423 Component, accordingly, shall be construed so as to extend and limit participation in a uniform and nondiscriminatory basis consistent with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code. In addition, this Plan authorizes the grant of options under the Non-423 Component which do not qualify under Section 423 of the Code pursuant to rules, procedures or subplans adopted by the Administrator designed to achieve tax, securities laws or other objectives for Eligible Employees and the Company. Except as otherwise indicated, the Non-423 Component will operate and be administered in the same manner as the 423 Component.

2.         Definitions.

(a)     “Administrator” shall mean the Board or any Committee designated by the Board to administer the Plan pursuant to Section 14.

(b)    “Affiliate” shall mean any corporation or other entity affiliated with the Company or in which the Company has an interest.

(c)        “Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.

(d)    “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:

(i)    Any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) other than a Permitted Transferee (as defined in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation) becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding voting securities; or

(ii)    The consummation of the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; or

(iii) A change in the composition of the Board occurring within a one-year period, as a result of which fewer than a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors. “Incumbent Directors” means directors who either (A) are Directors as of the effective date of the Plan, or (B) are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Directors at the time of such election or nomination (but will not include an individual whose election or nomination is in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of directors to the Company); or

(iv) The consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other

corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or its parent) at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.

(e)         “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

(f)         “Committee” means a committee of the Board appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 14 hereof.

(g)         “Common Stock” shall mean the Class A Common Stock of the Company.

(h)         “Company” shall mean Dolby Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

(i)         “Compensation” shall mean all base straight time gross earnings, commissions, overtime and shift premium, but exclusive of payments for incentive compensation, bonuses and other compensation. The Administrator shall have the discretion to determine the application of this definition to participants outside the United States.

(j)        “Designated Affiliate” shall mean any Affiliate selected by the Administrator as eligible to participate in the Non-423 Component.

(k)         “Designated Subsidiary” shall mean any Subsidiary selected by the Administrator as eligible to participate in the 423 Component.

(l)         “Director” shall mean a member of the Board.

(m)         “Eligible Employee” shall mean (i) any individual who is treated as an active employee in the records of the Company or any Designated Subsidiary or (ii) any individual who is treated as an active employee in the records of any Designated Affiliate other than an individual who, as of the Offering Date, resides in a country that has been specifically excluded from participation in the Non-423 Component at the discretion of the Administrator. For the 423 Component, Eligible Employees shall include only those employees whose customary employment with the Company or Designated Subsidiary is at least fifteen (15) hours per week and more than five (5) months in any calendar year. For purposes of the Plan, the employment relationship shall be treated as continuing intact while the individual is on sick leave or other leave of absence approved by the Company. Where the period of leave exceeds three (3) months and the individual’s right to reemployment is not guaranteed either by statute, legal precedent or by contract, the employment relationship shall be deemed to have terminated on the day which is three (3) months and one (1) day after the beginning of such leave. The employment relationship shall be treated as continuing intact where an Eligible Employee transfers employment between a Designated Subsidiary and a Designated Affiliate, and vice-versa, provided, however, that a participant who is not employed by a Designated Subsidiary on the Offering Date and through a date that is no more than three (3) months prior to the Exercise Date will participate only in the Non-423 Component. The Administrator shall establish rules to govern other such transfers consistent with the applicable requirements of Section 423 of the Code.

(n)         “Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(o)         “Exercise Date” shall mean the first Trading Day on or after May 15and November 15of each Purchase Period.

(p)         “Fair Market Value” shall mean, as of any date and unless the Administrator determines otherwise, the value of Common Stock determined as follows:

(i)    If the Common Stock is listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, including without limitation the New York Stock Exchange, the Nasdaq Global Market, the Nasdaq Global Select or the Nasdaq Capital Market, its Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on such exchange or system on the date of determination, as reported in The Wall Street

-2-

Journal or such other source as the Board deems reliable;

(ii)    If the Common Stock is regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer but selling prices are not reported, its Fair Market Value shall be the mean of the closing bid and asked prices for the Common Stock on the date of determination, as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Board deems reliable; or

(iii)    In the absence of an established market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value thereof shall be determined in good faith by the Board.

(q)         “Offering Date” shall mean the first Trading Day of each Offering Period.

(r)         “Offering Periods” shall mean the periods of approximately twelve (12) months during which an option granted pursuant to the Plan may be exercised, commencing on the first Trading Day following each Exercise Date and terminating on the applicable Exercise Date, approximately twelve months later. For example, the November 2012 Offering Period will commence on November 16, 2012, which is the first Trading Day following the November 15, 2012 Exercise Date, and the May 2013 Offering Period will commence on May 16, 2013 which is the first Trading Day following the May 15, 2013 Exercise Date. The duration and timing of Offering Periods may be changed pursuant to Section 4 of this Plan.

(s)         “Plan” shall mean this Employee Stock Purchase Plan including both the 423 and Non-423 Components.

(t)         “Purchase Period” means, for the first Purchase Period of any Offering Period, the approximately six (6) month period commencing on the Offering Date and ending on the next Exercise Date, and for the second Purchase Period of any Offering Period (if any), the approximately six (6) month period commencing on the first day following the first Exercise Date of the Offering Period and ending with the next and final Exercise Date of that Offering Period.

(u)     “Purchase Price” shall mean an amount equal to eighty-five percent (85%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the Offering Date or on the Exercise Date, whichever is lower; provided however, that the Purchase Price may be determined for subsequent Offering Periods by the Administrator in any manner or method it determines, pursuant to Section 20, and subject to (i) with respect to the 423 Component, compliance with Section 423 of the Code (or any successor rule or provision or any other applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule) or (ii) with respect to the Non-423 Component, pursuant to such manner or method as determined by the Administrator to comply with non-U.S. requirements.

(v)         “Subsidiary” shall mean a “subsidiary corporation,” whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.

(w)         “Trading Day” shall mean a day on which the national stock exchange upon which the Company Common Stock is listed is open for trading.

3.         Eligibility. Any Eligible Employee on a given Offering Date shall be eligible to participate in the Plan. Any provisions of the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, no Eligible Employee shall be granted an option under the Plan (i) to the extent that, immediately after the grant, such Eligible Employee (or any other person whose stock would be attributed to such Eligible Employee pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code) would own capital stock of the Company and/or hold outstanding options to purchase such stock possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of the capital stock of the Company or of any Subsidiary, or (ii) to the extent that his or her rights to purchase stock under all employee stock purchase plans of the Company and its subsidiaries accrues at a rate which exceeds Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) worth of stock (determined at the fair market value of the shares at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time.

4.         Offering Periods. The Plan shall be implemented by consecutive, overlapping Offering Periods with a new Offering Period commencing on the first Trading Day following each Exercise Date, or on such other date as the Board shall determine. The Board shall have the power to change the duration of Offering Periods (including the commencement

-3-

dates thereof) with respect to future offerings without stockholder approval if such change is announced prior to the scheduled beginning of the first Offering Period to be affected thereafter.

5.         Participation. An Eligible Employee may become a participant in the Plan by completing a subscription agreement in a form determined by the Administrator (which may be similar to the form attached hereto as Exhibit A) and filing it with the Company’s designated Plan administrator prior to the applicable Offering Date.

6.         Payroll Deductions or Contributions.

(a)         At the time a participant files his or her subscription agreement, he or she shall elect to have payroll deductions made on each pay day during the Offering Period in an amount not exceeding 10% of the Compensation which he or she receives on each pay day during the Offering Period, provided, however, that should a pay day occur on an Exercise Date, a participant shall have the payroll deductions made on such day applied to his or her account under the subsequent Purchase Period or Offering Period. Eligible Employees participating in the Non-423 Component may contribute funds to participate in the Plan through other means specified by the Administrator to comply with non-U.S. requirements, provided, however, that such contributions shall not exceed 10% of the Compensation received each pay day during the Offering Period. A participant’s subscription agreement shall remain in effect for successive Offering Periods unless terminated as provided in Section 10 hereof.

(b)         Payroll deductions or contributions, as applicable, for a participant shall commence on the first pay day following the Offering Date and shall end on the last pay day in the Offering Period to which such authorization is applicable, unless sooner terminated by the participant as provided in Section 10 hereof.

(c)         All payroll deductions or contributions made by a participant shall be credited to his or her account under the Plan in whole percentages only. A participant may not make any additional payments into such account.

(d)         A participant may discontinue his or her participation in the Plan as provided in Section 10 hereof, or may increase or decrease the rate of his or her payroll deductions or contributions during the Offering Period by completing or filing with the Company a new subscription agreement authorizing a change in payroll deduction rate or contribution. The Administrator may, in its discretion, limit the nature and/or number of participation rate changes during any Offering Period. The change in rate shall be effective with the first full payroll period following five (5) business days after the Company’s receipt of the new subscription agreement unless the Company elects to process a given change in participation more quickly.

(e)         Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent necessary to comply with Section 423(b)(8) of the Code and Section 3(c) hereof, a participant’s payroll deductions or contributions may be decreased to zero percent (0%) at any time during a Purchase Period. Payroll deductions or contributions shall recommence at the rate provided in such participant’s subscription agreement at the beginning of the first Purchase Period which is scheduled to end in the following calendar year, unless terminated by the participant as provided in Section 10 hereof.

(f)         At the time the option is exercised, in whole or in part, or at the time some or all of the Company’s Common Stock issued under the Plan is disposed of, the participant must make adequate provision for the Company’s or its Subsidiary’s or Affiliate’s federal, state, or any other tax liability payable to any authority, national insurance, social security, payment on account or other tax withholding obligations, if any, which arise upon the exercise of the option or the disposition of the Common Stock including, for the avoidance of doubt, any liability of the participant to pay an employer tax or social contribution obligation, which liability has been shifted to the participant as a matter of law or contract. At any time, the Company or its Subsidiary or Affiliate, as applicable, may, but shall not be obligated to, withhold from the participant’s compensation the amount necessary for the Company or its Subsidiary or Affiliate, as applicable, to meet applicable withholding obligations, including any withholding required to make available to the Company or its Subsidiary or Affiliate, as applicable, any tax deductions or benefits attributable to sale or early disposition of Common Stock by the Eligible Employee.

7.         Grant of Option. On the Offering Date of each Offering Period, each Eligible Employee participating in such Offering Period shall be granted an option to purchase on each Exercise Date during such Offering Period (at the

-4-

applicable Purchase Price) up to a number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock determined by dividing such Eligible Employee’s payroll deductions or contributions accumulated prior to such Exercise Date by the applicable Purchase Price; provided that in no event shall an Eligible Employee be permitted to purchase during each Purchase Period more than 1,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (subject to any adjustment pursuant to Section 19), and provided further that such purchase shall be subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 3(c) and 13 hereof. The Eligible Employee may accept the grant of such option by turning in a completed Subscription Agreement to the Company on or prior to an Offering Date. The Administrator may, for future Offering Periods, increase or decrease, in its absolute discretion, the maximum number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock an Eligible Employee may purchase during each Purchase Period. Exercise of the option shall occur as provided in Section 8 hereof, unless the participant has withdrawn pursuant to Section 10 hereof. The option shall expire on the last day of the Offering Period.

8.         Exercise of Option.

(a)         Unless a participant withdraws from the Plan as provided in Section 10 hereof, his or her option for the purchase of shares shall be exercised automatically on the Exercise Date, and the maximum number of full shares subject to option shall be purchased for such participant at the applicable Purchase Price with the accumulated payroll deductions or contributions in his or her account. No fractional shares shall be purchased; any payroll deductions or contributions accumulated in a participant’s account which are not sufficient to purchase a full share shall be retained in the participant’s account for the subsequent Purchase Period or Offering Period, subject to earlier withdrawal by the participant as provided in Section 10 hereof. Any other funds left over in a participant’s account after the Exercise Date shall be returned to the participant. During a participant’s lifetime, a participant’s option to purchase shares hereunder is exercisable only by him or her.

(b)         If the Administrator determines that, on a given Exercise Date, the number of shares with respect to which options are to be exercised may exceed (i) the number of shares of Common Stock that were available for sale under the Plan on the Offering Date of the applicable Offering Period, or (ii) the number of shares available for sale under the Plan on any Exercise Date, the Administrator may in its sole discretion provide that the Company shall make a pro rata allocation of the shares of Common Stock available for purchase on any Exercise Date in as uniform a manner as shall be practicable and as it shall determine in its sole discretion to be equitable among all participants exercising options to purchase Common Stock on any Exercise Date. The Company may make a pro rata allocation of the shares available on the Offering Date of any applicable Offering Period pursuant to the preceding sentence, notwithstanding any authorization of additional shares for issuance under the Plan by the Company’s stockholders subsequent to such Offering Date.

9.         Delivery. As soon as reasonably practicable after each Exercise Date on which a purchase of shares occurs, the Company shall arrange the delivery to each participant the shares purchased upon exercise of his or her option in a form determined by the Administrator.

10.         Withdrawal.

(a)         A participant may withdraw all but not less than all the payroll deductions or contributions credited to his or her account and not yet used to exercise his or her option under the Plan at any time by giving written notice to the Company in the form determined by the Administrator. All of the participant’s payroll deductions or contributions credited to his or her account shall be paid to such participant promptly after receipt of notice of withdrawal and such participant’s option for the Offering Period shall be automatically terminated, and no further payroll deductions or contributions for the purchase of shares shall be made for such Offering Period. If a participant withdraws from an Offering Period, payroll deductions or contributions shall not resume at the beginning of the succeeding Offering Period unless the participant delivers to the Company a new subscription agreement.

(b)         A participant’s withdrawal from an Offering Period shall not have any effect upon his or her eligibility to participate in any similar plan which may hereafter be adopted by the Company or in succeeding Offering Periods which commence after the termination of the Offering Period from which the participant withdraws.

11.         Termination of Employment. Upon a participant’s ceasing to be an Eligible Employee, for any reason, he or she shall be deemed to have elected to withdraw from the Plan and the payroll deductions or contributions credited

-5-

to such participant’s account during the Offering Period but not yet used to purchase shares of Common Stock under the Plan shall be returned to such participant or, in the case of his or her death, to the person or persons entitled thereto under Section 15, and such participant’s option shall be automatically terminated.

12.         Interest. No interest shall accrue on the payroll deductions or contributions of a participant in the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Administrator determines that interest is required to be accrued on the payroll deductions or contributions for participants in the Non-423 Component, then the Administrator shall cause such interest to accrue to the extent required by applicable non-U.S. requirements.

13.         Stock.

(a)         Subject to adjustment upon changes in capitalization of the Company as provided in Section 19 hereof, the maximum number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock which shall be made available for sale under the Plan shall be 1,000,000 shares. For avoidance of doubt, the maximum number of share limitation set forth in this section may be used to satisfy exercises of options under either the 423 or the Non-423 Components.

(b)         Until the shares are issued (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company), a participant shall only have the rights of an unsecured creditor with respect to such shares, and no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights as a stockholder shall exist with respect to such shares.

(c)         Shares to be delivered to a participant under the Plan shall be registered in the name of the participant or in the name of the participant and his or her spouse.

14.         Administration. The Administrator shall administer the Plan and shall have full and exclusive discretionary authority to construe, interpret and apply the terms of the Plan, to determine eligibility and to adjudicate all disputed claims filed under the Plan, including whether eligible Employees shall participate in the 423 Component or the Non-423 Component and which entities shall be Designated Subsidiaries or Designated Affiliates. Every finding, decision and determination made by the Administrator shall, to the full extent permitted by law, be final and binding upon all parties. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Plan, the Administrator may adopt rules or procedures relating to the operation and administration of the Plan to accommodate the specific requirements of local laws and procedures for jurisdictions outside of the United States. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Administrator is specifically authorized to adopt rules, procedures and subplans, which for purposes of the Non-423 Component may be outside the scope of Section 423 of the Code, regarding, but not limited to, eligibility to participate, the definition of Compensation, handling of payroll deductions, making of contributions to the Plan (including, without limitation, in forms other than payroll deductions), establishment of bank or trust accounts to hold payroll deductions, payment of interest, conversion of local currency, obligations to pay payroll tax, determination of beneficiary designation requirements, withholding procedures and handling of stock certificates which vary with local requirements.

15.         Designation of Beneficiary.

(a)         Unless otherwise provided in the subscription agreement, and at the discretion of the Administrator prior to the beginning of an Offering Period, a participant in the 423 Component may file a designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any shares and cash, if any, from the participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such participant’s death subsequent to an Exercise Date on which the option is exercised but prior to delivery to such participant of such shares and cash. In addition, at the discretion of the Administrator prior to the beginning of an Offering Period, a participant in the 423 Component may file a designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any cash from the participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such participant’s death prior to exercise of the option. If a participant is married and the designated beneficiary is not the spouse, spousal consent shall be required for such designation to be effective.

(b)         Such designation of beneficiary may be changed by the participant at any time by notice in a form determined by the Administrator. In the event of the death of a participant and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated under the Plan who is living at the time of such participant’s death, the Company shall deliver such shares and/or cash to the executor or administrator of the estate of the participant, or if no such executor or administrator has been

-6-

appointed (to the knowledge of the Company), the Company, in its discretion, may deliver such shares and/or cash to the spouse or to any one or more dependents or relatives of the participant, or if no spouse, dependent or relative is known to the Company, then to such other person as the Company may designate.

(c)         All beneficiary designations shall be in such form and manner as the Administrator may designate from time to time.

16.         Transferability. Neither payroll deductions nor contributions credited to a participant’s account nor any rights with regard to the exercise of an option or to receive shares under the Plan may be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of in any way (other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or as provided in Section 15 hereof) by the participant. Any such attempt at assignment, transfer, pledge or other disposition shall be without effect, except that the Company may treat such act as an election to withdraw funds from an Offering Period in accordance with Section 10 hereof.

17.         Use of Funds. All payroll deductions or contributions received or held by the Company under the Plan may be used by the Company for any corporate purpose, and the Company shall not be obligated to segregate such payroll deductions or contributions except for deductions or contributions made to a Non-423 Component where, as determined by the Administrator, non-U.S. law requires segregation of such amounts. Until shares are issued, participants shall only have the rights of an unsecured creditor, although participants in the Non-423 Component may have additional rights where required under local law, as determined by the Administrator.

18.         Reports. Individual accounts shall be maintained for each participant in the Plan. Statements of account shall be given to participating Eligible Employees at least annually, which statements shall set forth the amounts of payroll deductions, the Purchase Price, the number of shares purchased and the remaining cash balance, if any.

19.         Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization, Dissolution, Liquidation, Merger or Change in Control.

(a)         Changes in Capitalization. Subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, the maximum number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock which shall be made available for sale under the Plan, the maximum number of shares each participant may purchase each Purchase Period (pursuant to Section 7), as well as the price per share and the number of shares of Common Stock covered by each option under the Plan which has not yet been exercised shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of the Common Stock, or any other change in the number of shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.” Such adjustment shall be made by the Administrator, whose determination in that respect shall be final, binding and conclusive. Except as expressly provided herein, no issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price of shares of Common Stock subject to an option.

(b)         Dissolution or Liquidation. In the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, all Offering Periods then in progress shall be shortened by setting a new Exercise Date (the “New Exercise Date”), and shall terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed dissolution or liquidation, unless provided otherwise by the Administrator. The New Exercise Date shall be before the date of the Company’s proposed dissolution or liquidation. The Administrator shall notify each participant in writing, at least ten (10) business days prior to the New Exercise Date, that the Exercise Date for the participant’s option has been changed to the New Exercise Date and that the participant’s option shall be exercised automatically on the New Exercise Date, unless prior to such date the participant has withdrawn from the Offering Period as provided in Section 10 hereof.

(c)         Merger or Change in Control. In the event of a merger or Change in Control, each outstanding option shall be assumed or an equivalent option substituted by the successor corporation or a Parent or Subsidiary of the successor corporation. In the event that the successor corporation refuses to assume or substitute for the option, all Offering Periods then in progress shall be shortened by setting a New Exercise Date and shall end on the New Exercise Date. The New Exercise Date shall be before the date of the Company’s proposed merger or Change in Control. The Administrator

-7-

shall notify each participant in writing, at least ten (10) business days prior to the New Exercise Date, that the Exercise Date for the participant’s option has been changed to the New Exercise Date and that the participant’s option shall be exercised automatically on the New Exercise Date, unless prior to such date the participant has withdrawn from the Offering Period as provided in Section 10 hereof.

20.         Amendment or Termination.

(a)         The Administrator may at any time and for any reason terminate or amend the Plan. Except as provided in Section 19 and this Section 20 hereof, no amendment may make any change in any option theretofore granted which adversely affects the rights of any participant unless their consent is obtained. To the extent necessary to comply with Section 423 of the Code (or any successor rule or provision or any other applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule), the Company shall obtain stockholder approval of any amendment in such a manner and to such a degree as required.

(b)         Without stockholder approval and without regard to whether any participant rights may be considered to have been “adversely affected,” the Administrator shall be entitled to change the Offering Periods or Purchase Periods, limit the frequency and/or number of changes in the amount withheld during an Offering Period or Purchase Period, establish the exchange ratio applicable to amounts withheld in a currency other than U.S. dollars, permit payroll withholding in excess of the amount designated by a participant in order to adjust for delays or mistakes in the Company’s processing of properly completed subscription agreements, establish reasonable waiting and adjustment periods and/or accounting and crediting procedures to ensure that amounts applied toward the purchase of Common Stock for each participant properly correspond with amounts withheld from the participant’s Compensation, and establish such other limitations or procedures as the Administrator determines in its sole discretion advisable which are consistent with the Plan.

(c)         Without regard to whether any participant’s rights may be considered to have been “adversely affected”, in the event the Administrator determines that the ongoing operation of the Plan may result in unfavorable financial accounting consequences, the Board may, in its discretion and, to the extent necessary or desirable, modify or amend the Plan to reduce or eliminate such accounting consequence including:

(i) Increasing the Purchase Price for any Offering Period or Purchase Period including an Offering Period or Purchase Period underway at the time of the change in Purchase Price;

(ii)    Shortening any Offering Period or Purchase Period by establishing a new Exercise Date, including an Offering Period or Purchase Period underway at the time of the Board action; and

(iii) Reducing the number of shares that may be purchased upon exercise of outstanding options.

Such modifications or amendments shall not require stockholder approval or the consent of any Plan participants.

21.         Notices. All notices or other communications by a participant to the Company under or in connection with the Plan shall be deemed to have been duly given when received in the form and manner specified by the Company at the location, or by the person, designated by the Company for the receipt thereof.

22.         Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares. Shares shall not be issued with respect to an option unless the exercise of such option and the issuance and delivery of such shares pursuant thereto shall comply with all applicable provisions of law, U.S. and non-U.S. and state and local provisions, including, without limitation, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and the requirements of any stock exchange upon which the shares may then be listed, and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance.

As a condition to the exercise of an option, the Company may require the person exercising such option to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such a representation is required by any of the aforementioned applicable provisions of law.

-8-

23.         Term of Plan. The Plan shall become effective upon the earlier to occur of its adoption by the Board of Directors or its approval by the stockholders of the Company. It shall continue in effect until terminated under Section 20 hereof.

24.        Stockholder Approval. The Plan will be subject to the approval by stockholders of the Company within twelve (12) months after the date the Plan is adopted by the Board. Such stockholder approval will be obtained in the manner and to the degree required under applicable law.

25.     Automatic Transfer to Lower Price Offering Period. To the extent permitted by Applicable Laws, if the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on any Exercise Date in an Offering Period is lower than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Offering Date of such Offering Period, then all participants in such Offering Period will be automatically withdrawn from such Offering Period immediately after the exercise of their option on such Exercise Date and automatically re-enrolled in the immediately following Offering Period as of the first day thereof.

-9-

EX-10.38

Exhibit 10.38

March 2, 2012

Michael Bergeron

Dear Michael,

It is my distinct pleasure to confirm to you our offer to join Dolby Laboratories. Inc. (“Dolby”) as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales & Field Operations, reporting to Ramzi Haidamus, EVP, Sales and Marketing, in the Sales & Marketing Division. Your annualized starting base salary will be $350,000, payable bi-weekly (in accordance with our 9/80 work schedule) and subject to applicable tax withholdings. We will assume your date of hire to be Monday April 2, 2012. Please contact us as soon as possible if you would like to adjust your start date.

We will recommend to a committee of Dolby’s Board of Directors that they grant you a one-time new hire stock option and restricted stock unit (RSU) award under the Dolby Laboratories, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan (the “Plan”). The option to purchase 90,225 shares of Dolby’s Class A common stock and a grant of 20,950 restricted stock units will be presented for their consideration on the I 5th day of the month (or the next business day, if the 1 5th day falls on a weekend or holiday) following the month of your date of hire. If approved, your options will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Class A common stock as of the close of the markets on the date of the award. Options and RSUs may be awarded only by the Board or a committee of the Board and are subject to the standard terms and conditions of the Plan and the execution of the award agreement.

You are eligible to participate in the Dolby Annual Incentive Plan (“DAIP”) for the fiscal year ending September 2012. You are eligible to receive a DAIP target award of sixty five percent (65%) of your annual base salary at the end of the fiscal year (prorated for this fiscal year). This target award is based on the successful completion of company performance objectives and your individual performance. Subject to your continued employment with Dolby, your first incentive target payout (if any) of the DAIP would be in December 2012 for the fiscal year ended September 2012, prorated to your date of hire.

Performance and Development Evaluations are completed annually by December. You will first be eligible for a merit increase in January 2013 after your focal review.

This offer also includes a sign-on bonus of $50,000, payable with your first paycheck from Dolby and a second sign-on bonus of $25,000 after one year of service. All of the above-aforementioned monies will he repayable to Dolby should you voluntarily end your employment within twelve (12) months from your hire date. Also, please be advised that some or all of the monies, including your sign-on bonus, will be subject to federal and state taxation. For specific tax information, please refer to the IRS website or contact your tax advisor.

Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
100 Potrero Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94103-4813 USA
T 415-558-0200
F 415-863-1373
dolby.com

As a full-time employee of Dolby, you will be eligible to participate in our comprehensive benefits package. As part of your benefits package, you will initially accrue Personal Time Off (PTO) at a rate of 4.62 hours per full pay period (120 hours per year). Additionally, you will receive 40 hours per year, up to a maximum of 120 hours, in a Reserve Illness Account (RIA) on January 1st (a pro-rated number of hours will be added for calendar 2012 upon hire). You will also be eligible for Dolby’s designated paid holidays.

You will be eligible to enroll in Dolby’s health plan(s) on the first day of your employment. In addition to Dolby’s health plan(s) benefits, you will also be eligible to participate in our 40 1(k) Plan (the “Dolby Laboratories, Inc. Retirement Plan”) as soon as administratively feasible following your date of hire. Enclosed with this letter is our general benefits information packet but more specific plan information will be reviewed with you during the orientation on your first day of employment.

The employment relationship between you and Dolby is one of employment “at-will” with either pally having the right to terminate the relationship at any time, with or without cause. Our employment at-will relationship can only be modified by a written agreement signed by Dolby’s President.

By signing this offer of employment as set forth below you acknowledge that this offer of employment is contingent upon completion of the FOUR factors noted below prior to your first day of employment. The documents noted in factors #1 & #2 will be sent to you electronically via Red Carpet, our on-boarding tool.

1. That you execute a Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement upon acceptance of our offer of employment.

2. That you sign the Acknowledgement of Receipt Form to acknowledge that you have received and read the following:

a. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”);

b. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. Insider Trading Compliance Program (the “Insider Trading Policy”);

c. Dolby Laboratories. Inc. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Compliance Policy (the FCPA Policy ); and

d. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. Policy Regarding Reporting of Financial and Accounting Concerns (the “Policy Regarding Reporting of Financial and Accounting Concerns”

3. On your first day of employment, you produce documentation that verifies your eligibility to be legally employed in the United States. This documentation generally consists of any combination of documents listed on the enclosed Employment Eligibility Verification (I-9) Form. This documentation must be presented to us on your first working day. As needed, Dolby will sponsor non-immigrant visas for you and your dependents to the extent of your eligibility.

4. That a background check is completed to our satisfaction.

Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
100 Potrero Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94103-4813 USA
T 415-558-0200
F 415-863-1373
dolby.com

This offer of employment supersedes all prior offers, both verbal and written and is the complete understanding of our offer of employment to you. To acknowledge your acceptance, please sign below and scan and email the document in its entirety to my attention at adahl@dolby.com no later than 5 p.m. (PST) on Monday, March 5, 2012. In addition, please bring this original, signed letter to your first day’s orientation

We feel that you can make a significant contribution to the growth and future of Dolby and we look forward to welcoming you to our team!

Sincerely,

/s/ Andrew Dahlkemper

Andrew Dahlkemper

SVP, Human Resources

************************************************************************

I have read, understand, and accept the offer of employment as stated above:

Michael Bergeron    5-2-2012

Michael Bergeron                    Date

EX-21.1

Exhibit 21.1

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

Name	Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Organization
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	California
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation	New York
Dolby International AB	Sweden

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333‑122908, 333-150804, and 333-174319) on Form S-8 of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) of our reports dated November 15, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 28, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2012, which reports appear in the September 28, 2012 annual report on Form 10‑K of the Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California

November 15, 2012

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin J. Yeaman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dolby Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2012

/s/    KEVIN J. YEAMAN

Kevin J. Yeaman

President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Lewis Chew, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dolby Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2012

/s/    LEWIS CHEW

Lewis Chew

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Kevin J. Yeaman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Lewis Chew, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

• The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

• The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2012

/s/    KEVIN J. YEAMAN

Kevin J. Yeaman

President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/    LEWIS CHEW

Lewis Chew

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

XML

Per Share Data (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted

We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period. For diluted earnings per share, we divide net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding and the potential number of dilutive shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	264,302	$	309,267	$	283,447
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic	106,926		111,444		113,452
Potential common shares from options to purchase Class A and Class B common stock	493		941		1,769
Potential common shares from restricted stock units	122		169		167
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted	107,541		112,554		115,388
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.—basic	$	2.47	$	2.78	$	2.50
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.—diluted	$	2.46	$	2.75	$	2.46
Antidilutive options excluded from calculation	6,496		3,289		2,074
Antidilutive restricted stock units excluded from calculation	2,550		535		457

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Future Amortization Expense) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]
2013	$ 15,605
2014	13,473
2015	11,017
2016	8,849
2017	5,736
Thereafter	1,846
Total	$ 56,526

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Accounts Receivable) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Accounts receivable, gross	$ 44,451	$ 64,281
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts	(956)	(2,466)
Accounts receivable, net	43,495	61,815
Trade Accounts Receivable [Member]
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Trade accounts receivable	43,565	59,831
Patent Administration Program [Member]
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Accounts receivable related to patent administration program	$ 886	$ 4,450

XML

Restructuring (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011 employee	Sep. 24, 2010 employee
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Number of positions eliminated		55	60
Asset impairment charges	$ 0	$ 0	$ 9,594,000
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Restructuring reserve, beginning balance	2,370,000	3,034,000
Restructuring charges	1,191,000	3,406,000
Cash payments	(2,958,000)	(3,847,000)
Non-cash charges	(270,000)	(223,000)
Restructuring reserve, ending balance	333,000	2,370,000	3,034,000
Severance [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Recorded severance and other associated costs	400,000	2,500,000	3,900,000
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Restructuring reserve, beginning balance	2,250,000	2,804,000
Restructuring charges	318,000	3,185,000
Cash payments	(2,572,000)	(3,716,000)
Non-cash charges	4,000	(23,000)
Restructuring reserve, ending balance	0	2,250,000	2,804,000
Facilities And Contract Termination Costs [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring charges	400,000
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Restructuring reserve, beginning balance	0	0
Restructuring charges	352,000	0
Cash payments	(185,000)	0
Non-cash charges	164,000	0
Restructuring reserve, ending balance	331,000	0
Fixed Assets Write-Off [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Asset impairment charges	400,000	200,000
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Restructuring reserve, beginning balance	0	0
Restructuring charges	424,000	199,000
Cash payments	0	0
Non-cash charges	(424,000)	(199,000)
Restructuring reserve, ending balance	0	0
Other Associated Costs [Member]
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Restructuring reserve, beginning balance	120,000	230,000
Restructuring charges	97,000	22,000
Cash payments	(201,000)	(131,000)
Non-cash charges	(14,000)	(1,000)
Restructuring reserve, ending balance	2,000	120,000
Restructuring Charges [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Asset impairment charges			$ 3,400,000

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Goodwill) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]
Beginning balance	$ 263,260	$ 264,580
Acquired goodwill	15,988	182
Translation adjustments and other	2,127	(1,502)
Ending balance	$ 281,375	$ 263,260

XML

Commitments And Contingencies (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Rental expenses under operating leases	$ 13.5	$ 12.6	$ 8.7
Expense for rent paid to principal stockholder	$ 1.4	$ 1.4	$ 1.4

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Gross Unrealized Losses And The Fair Value For Available-For-Sale Securities) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Fair Value, Less than 12 months	$ 119,981	$ 171,076
Gross Unrealized Losses, Less than 12 months	(59)	(543)
Fair Value, 12 months or greater	5,565	2,081
Gross Unrealized Losses, 12 months or greater	(1)	(3)
Fair Value	125,546	173,157
Gross Unrealized Losses	(60)	(546)
U.S. Agency Securities [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Fair Value, Less than 12 months	6,999	3,997
Gross Unrealized Losses, Less than 12 months	(3)	(4)
Fair Value	6,999	3,997
Gross Unrealized Losses	(3)	(4)
Municipal Debt Securities [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Fair Value, Less than 12 months	87,705	79,466
Gross Unrealized Losses, Less than 12 months	(37)	(52)
Fair Value, 12 months or greater	5,565	2,081
Gross Unrealized Losses, 12 months or greater	(1)	(3)
Fair Value	93,270	81,547
Gross Unrealized Losses	(38)	(55)
Corporate Bonds [Member]
Schedule of Available-for-sale Securities [Line Items]
Fair Value, Less than 12 months	25,277	87,613
Gross Unrealized Losses, Less than 12 months	(19)	(487)
Gross Unrealized Losses, 12 months or greater	0
Fair Value	25,277	87,613
Gross Unrealized Losses	$ (19)	$ (487)

XML

Commitments And Contingencies (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule Of Contractual Obligations And Commitments

The following table presents a summary of our contractual obligations and commitments as of September 28, 2012:

	Payments Due By Period
	Fiscal 2013		Fiscal 2014		Fiscal 2015		Fiscal 2016		Fiscal 2017		Thereafter		Total
	(in thousands)
Naming rights (1)	$	—	$	7,341	$	7,432	$	7,525	$	7,619	$	126,414	$	156,331
Operating leases (2)	13,751		10,860		7,840		5,897		4,111		5,981		48,440
Purchase obligations (3)	3,832		607		105		—		—		—		4,544
Total	$	17,583	$	18,808	$	15,377	$	13,422	$	11,730	$	132,395	$	209,315

(1) In April 2012, we entered into an agreement for naming rights and related benefits with respect to the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, California, the location of the Academy Awards®. In exchange for these rights and other benefits, we made one annual payment in fiscal 2012 and will subsequently make semi-annual payments over the term. Our payment obligations are conditioned in part on the Academy Awards® being held and broadcast from the Dolby Theatre. The term of the agreement is 20 years.

(2) Operating lease payments include future minimum rental commitments, including those payable to our principal stockholder and portions attributable to the controlling interests in our wholly owned subsidiaries, for non-cancelable operating leases of office space.

(3) Our purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services, entered into in the ordinary course of business. These represent non-cancelable commitments for which a penalty would be imposed if the agreement was canceled for any reason other than an event of default as described by the agreement.

XML

Commitments And Contingencies (Schedule Of Contractual Obligations And Commitments) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Naming rights, Fiscal 2014	$ 7,341	[1]
Naming rights, Fiscal 2015	7,432	[1]
Naming rights, Fiscal 2016	7,525	[1]
Naming rights, Fiscal 2017	7,619	[1]
Naming rights, Thereafter	126,414	[1]
Naming rights, Total	156,331	[1]
Unrecorded Unconditional Obligation, Term of Agreement	20 years
Operating leases, Fiscal 2013	13,751	[2]
Operating leases, Fiscal 2014	10,860	[2]
Operating leases, Fiscal 2015	7,840	[2]
Operating leases, Fiscal 2016	5,897	[2]
Operating leases, Fiscal 2017	4,111	[2]
Operating leases, Thereafter	5,981	[2]
Operating leases, Total	48,440	[2]
Purchase obligation, Fiscal 2013	3,832	[3]
Purchase obligation, Fiscal 2014	607	[3]
Purchase obligation, Fiscal 2015	105	[3]
Purchase obligation, Total	4,544	[3]
Total, due in Fiscal 2013	17,583
Total, due in Fiscal 2014	18,808
Total, due in Fiscal 2015	15,377
Total, due in Fiscal 2016	13,422
Total, due in Fiscal 2017	11,730
Total, due Thereafter	132,395
Total due	$ 209,315

[1] In April 2012, we entered into an agreement for naming rights and related benefits with respect to the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, California, the location of the Academy Awards®. In exchange for these rights and other benefits, we made one annual payment in fiscal 2012 and will subsequently make semi-annual payments over the term. Our payment obligations are conditioned in part on the Academy Awards® being held and broadcast from the Dolby Theatre. The term of the agreement is 20 years.

[2] Operating lease payments include future minimum rental commitments, including those payable to our principal stockholder and portions attributable to the controlling interests in our wholly owned subsidiaries, for non-cancelable operating leases of office space.

[3] Our purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services, entered into in the ordinary course of business. These represent non-cancelable commitments for which a penalty would be imposed if the agreement was canceled for any reason other than an event of default as described by the agreement.

XML

Income Taxes (Schedule Of Provision For Income Taxes ) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Current:
Federal	$ 56,105	$ 71,336	$ 109,050
State	2,922	18,069	18,382
Foreign	43,659	33,567	41,942
Total current	102,686	122,972	169,374
Deferred:
Federal	904	3,638	(12,790)
State	521	9,756	(1,149)
Foreign	(254)	(6,305)	(1,250)
Total deferred	1,171	7,089	(15,189)
Provision for income taxes	$ 103,857	$ 130,061	$ 154,185

XML

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) (Schedule Of Selected Quarterly Financial Data) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Jun. 29, 2012	Mar. 30, 2012	Dec. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jul. 01, 2011	Apr. 01, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Quarterly Financial Data [Abstract]
Licensing	$ 191,154	$ 178,436	$ 225,349	$ 199,624	$ 205,747	$ 181,790	$ 214,627	$ 188,176	$ 794,563	$ 790,340	$ 710,474
Products	27,628	22,132	27,228	26,400	30,842	28,395	26,347	46,027	103,388	131,611	180,402
Services	5,973	7,304	7,682	7,354	7,179	8,814	9,052	8,509	28,313	33,554	31,837
Total revenue	224,755	207,872	260,259	233,378	243,768	218,999	250,026	242,712	926,264	955,505	922,713
Cost of revenue	26,994	21,031	23,592	20,410	25,642	27,933	28,457	29,139	92,027	111,171	131,815
Gross margin	197,761	186,841	236,667	212,968	218,126	191,066	221,569	213,573	834,237	844,334	790,898
Income before taxes and controlling interest	72,951	70,321	122,515	103,204	116,632	90,451	122,494	111,066	368,991	440,643	437,012
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$ 51,494	$ 51,529	$ 88,120	$ 73,159	$ 79,071	$ 61,748	$ 82,061	$ 86,387	$ 264,302	$ 309,267	$ 283,447
Earnings Per Share, Basic	$ 0.49	$ 0.48	$ 0.81	$ 0.67	$ 0.72	$ 0.55	$ 0.73	$ 0.77	$ 2.47	$ 2.78	$ 2.50
Earnings Per Share, Diluted	$ 0.49	$ 0.48	$ 0.81	$ 0.67	$ 0.71	$ 0.55	$ 0.72	$ 0.76	$ 2.46	$ 2.75	$ 2.46
Shares outstanding-basic	104,079	106,328	108,415	108,884	110,063	111,494	112,140	112,035	106,926	111,444	113,452
Shares outstanding-diluted	104,915	107,202	109,170	109,443	110,662	112,349	113,346	113,713	107,541	112,554	115,388

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Other Non-Current Liabilities) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]
Supplemental retirement plan obligations	$ 2,042	$ 1,811
Non-current tax liabilities	20,862	13,070
Other liabilities	16,933	8,574
Other non-current liabilities	$ 39,837	$ 23,455

XML

Income Taxes (Aggregate Changes In Balance Of Gross Unrecognized Tax Benefits, Excluding Interest And Penalties) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Reconciliation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits, Excluding Amounts Pertaining to Examined Tax Returns [Roll Forward]
Unrecognized Tax Benefits, Beginning Balance	$ 8,683	$ 16,558	$ 16,916
Lapse of statute of limitations	(1,236)	(1,097)	(2,143)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	(493)	(8,083)	0
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	3,156	1,006	520
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	6,770	299	1,265
Unrecognized Tax Benefits, Ending Balance	$ 16,880	$ 8,683	$ 16,558

XML

Comprehensive Income (Components Of Comprehensive Income) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, Attributable to Parent [Abstract]
Net income including controlling interest	$ 265,134	$ 310,582	$ 282,827
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax	3,082	509	(1,290)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes	380	(907)	(622)
Comprehensive income	268,596	310,184	280,915
Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to controlling interest	(1,140)	(1,185)	792
Comprehensive income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$ 267,456	$ 308,999	$ 281,707

XML

Geographic Data (Schedule Of Concentration Of Revenue From Individual Geographic Regions) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
U.S. [Member]
Revenue From External Customer [Line Items]
Concentration of revenue from individual geographic regions	33.00%	32.00%	34.00%
Japan [Member]
Revenue From External Customer [Line Items]
Concentration of revenue from individual geographic regions	18.00%	20.00%	19.00%
Europe [Member]
Revenue From External Customer [Line Items]
Concentration of revenue from individual geographic regions	15.00%	15.00%	16.00%
Taiwan [Member]
Revenue From External Customer [Line Items]
Concentration of revenue from individual geographic regions	7.00%	8.00%	9.00%
South Korea [Member]
Revenue From External Customer [Line Items]
Concentration of revenue from individual geographic regions	17.00%	13.00%	12.00%
China [Member]
Revenue From External Customer [Line Items]
Concentration of revenue from individual geographic regions	6.00%	6.00%	5.00%
Other [Member]
Revenue From External Customer [Line Items]
Concentration of revenue from individual geographic regions	4.00%	6.00%	5.00%

XML

Comprehensive Income (Schedule of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, Attributable to Parent [Abstract]
Accumulated foreign currency translation gains, net of tax of ($2,623) and ($2,653)	$ 9,608	$ 6,834
Accumulated unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($597) and ($387)	1,079	699
Total accumulated other comprehensive income	10,687	7,533
Accumulated foreign currency translation gains, tax	2,623	2,653
Accumulated unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, tax	$ 597	$ 387

XML

Retirement Plans (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Expense [Abstract]
Retirement plan expenses	$ 12.9	$ 11.3	$ 11.1

XML

Income Taxes (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2010	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010	Jul. 31, 2012	Sep. 25, 2009	Apr. 30, 2009
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Licensing revenue withholding tax remittances		$ 38,500,000	$ 32,200,000	$ 31,600,000
Deferred income tax withholding tax foreign earnings	162,200,000
U.S. income taxes, adjusted for any foreign tax credits, and withholding taxes		48,300,000
Deferred tax liability related to the amortization of intangible asset	11,000,000
Net operating loss carryover for Spain					1,700,000
Net operating loss carryovers for Federal tax purposes		6,400,000					9,700,000
Net operating loss carryovers for California tax purposes		9,600,000					9,600,000
Net operating loss carryovers for Australia tax purposes		100,000
Unrecognized tax benefits, gross		16,880,000	8,683,000	16,558,000		16,916,000
Unrecognized tax benefits if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate		10,900,000
Accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits		2,000,000	2,000,000
Accrued penalties on unrecognized tax benefits		1,900,000	2,400,000
Reduction in penalties for current tax provision		500,000
Increase in interest expense for current tax provision		$ 100,000

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Policy)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Principles Of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dolby Laboratories and our wholly owned subsidiaries. In addition, we have consolidated the financial results of jointly owned affiliated companies in which our principal stockholder has a controlling interest. We report these controlling interests as a separate line in our consolidated statements of operations as net (income) / loss attributable to controlling interest and in our consolidated balance sheets as controlling interest. We eliminate all intercompany accounts and transactions upon consolidation.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include estimated selling prices for elements sold in multiple-element revenue arrangements, valuation allowances for accounts receivable, carrying values of inventories and certain property, plant, and equipment, products provided under operating leases, goodwill, intangible assets, stock-based compensation, fair values of investments, accrued expenses, including liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, and deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

Fiscal Year

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year is a 52 or 53 week period ending on the last Friday in September. The fiscal years presented herein include the 52 week periods ended September 28, 2012 (fiscal 2012) and September 24, 2010 (fiscal 2010) and the 53 week period ended September 30, 2011 (fiscal 2011).

Reclassifications

Reclassifications

We have reclassified certain prior year amounts within our consolidated statements of stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and within investing and financing activities of our consolidated statements of cash flows to conform to our current year presentation. These reclassifications did not affect total revenue, operating income, operating cash flows, or net income.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash, cash equivalents, investments, and accounts receivable. Our investment portfolio consists of investment grade securities diversified amongst security types, industries, and issuers. All our securities are held in custody by a recognized financial institution. Our policy limits the amount of credit exposure to maximum of 5% to any one issuer, except for the U.S. Treasury, and we believe no significant concentration risk exists with respect to these investments. Our products are sold to businesses primarily in the Americas and Europe, and the majority of our licensing revenue is generated from customers outside of the U.S. We manage this risk by evaluating in advance the financial condition and creditworthiness of our products and services customers and performing regular evaluations of the creditworthiness of our licensing customers. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and fiscal 2010, one customer accounted for approximately 14%, 13%, and 12%, respectively, of our total revenue.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of funds held in general checking accounts, money market accounts, commercial paper, and U.S. agency notes.

Investments

Investments

All of our investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, with the exception of our investments held in our supplemental retirement plan, which are classified as trading. Investments that have an original maturity of 91 days or more at the date of purchase and a current maturity of less than one year are classified as short-term investments, while investments with a current maturity of more than one year are classified as long-term investments. Our investments are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, while realized gains and losses, other-than-temporary impairments, and credit losses are reported as a component of net income.

We evaluate our investment portfolio for credit losses and other-than-temporary impairments by comparing the fair value with the cost basis for each of our investment securities. An investment is impaired if the fair value is less than its cost basis. If any portion of the impairment is deemed to be the result of a credit loss, the credit loss portion of the impairment is included as a component of net income. If we deem it probable that we will not recover the full cost basis of the security, the security is other-than-temporarily impaired and the impairment loss is recognized as a component of net income.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We continually monitor customer payments and maintain a reserve for estimated losses resulting from our customers’ inability to make required payments. In determining the reserve, we evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based upon a variety of factors. In cases where we are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations, we record a specific allowance against amounts due, and thereby reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably believed to be collectible. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on our actual historical write-off experience in conjunction with the length of time the receivables are past due, customer creditworthiness, geographic risk, and the current business environment. Actual future losses from uncollectible accounts may differ from our estimates.

Inventories

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market (net realizable value). We evaluate our ending inventories for estimated excess quantities and obsolescence. Our evaluation includes the analysis of future sales demand by product within specific time horizons. Inventories in excess of projected future demand are written down to net realizable value. In addition, we assess the impact of changing technology on our inventory balances and write off inventories that are considered obsolete. Write-downs of inventory are recorded as a cost of products.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method based on estimated useful lives as follows:

Systems and software	3 to 5 years
Machinery and equipment	3 to 8 years
Furniture and fixtures	5 to 8 years
Leasehold improvements	Lesser of useful life or related lease term
Buildings	Up to 40 years

Internal Use Software

Internal Use Software

We account for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use by capitalizing costs of materials, consultants, personnel and personnel-related costs incurred in developing internal use computer software. These costs are included in property, plant and equipment, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages are charged to expense. Our capitalized internal use software costs are typically amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of three to five years.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Long-Lived Assets

We test goodwill for impairment annually during our third fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 which amends the rules for testing goodwill for impairment. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-08 for our annual goodwill impairment test performed in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

In performing the qualitative assessments, we consider events and circumstances, including but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, changes in management or key personnel, changes in strategy, changes in customers, changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting unit's net assets and changes in the price of our common stock. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, then the two-step goodwill impairment test is not performed.

If the two-step goodwill test is performed, we evaluate and test our goodwill for impairment at a reporting-unit level using expected future cash flows to be generated by the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill over the calculated fair value of the goodwill. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below. Our operating segments are aligned with the management principles of our business.

We completed our annual goodwill impairment assessment in the fiscal quarter ended June 29, 2012. At the time of our annual goodwill impairment test for fiscal 2012, we had two reporting units: Via, which corresponds to our wholly owned subsidiary and has no assigned goodwill, and Dolby Entertainment Technology ("DET"), with goodwill of $263.5 million. We determined, after assessing the totality of the events and circumstances described above, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount. Accordingly, there was no indication of impairment and the two-step goodwill impairment test was not performed. We did not recognize any goodwill impairment losses in fiscal 2012, 2011, or 2010.

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Our intangible assets principally consist of acquired technology, patents, trademarks, customer relationships, and contracts, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives ranging from two to seventeen years.

We review long-lived assets, including intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or a change in circumstances indicate an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparing its carrying value to the total future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If it is determined that an asset is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. See Note 3 “Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions” for a discussion of impairment charges recognized in fiscal 2010.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

We enter into revenue arrangements with our customers to license technology, trademarks, and know-how and to sell products and services. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Judgment is required to assess whether collectibility is probable. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of our customer's recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter of credit between the customer's financial institution and our financial institution, and other factors. Some of our revenue arrangements include multiple elements, such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services.

Multiple Element Arrangements. We evaluate each element in a multiple element (“ME”) arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value and delivery of an undelivered element is both probable and within our control. When these criteria are not met, the delivered and undelivered elements are combined and the arrangement fees are allocated to this combined single unit.

If the unit separation criteria are met, we account for each element within a ME arrangement (such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services) separately, and we allocate fees from the arrangement based on the relative selling price of each element. For some arrangements, customers receive certain elements over a period of time, after delivery of the initial product. These elements may include support and maintenance and/or the right to receive upgrades. Revenue allocated to the undelivered element is recognized either over its estimated service period or when the upgrade is delivered. We do not recognize revenue that is contingent upon the future delivery of products or services or upon future performance obligations. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when we have completed all contractual obligations.

We determine our best estimate of the selling price for an individual element within a ME revenue arrangement using the same methods used to determine the selling price of an element sold on a standalone basis. If we sell the element on a standalone basis, we estimate the selling price by considering actual sales prices. Otherwise, we estimate the selling price by considering internal factors such as pricing practices and margin objectives. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies, customer demands, and industry technology lifecycles. Management applies judgment to establish margin objectives, pricing strategies, and technology lifecycles.

Revenue recognition for transactions which involve software, such as fees we earn from certain system licensees, requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for those elements. For some of our ME arrangements, customers receive certain elements of the arrangement over a period of time or after delivery of the initial software. These elements may include support and maintenance. The fair values of these elements are recognized over the estimated period for which these elements will be delivered, which is sometimes the estimated life of the software. If we do not have VSOE of fair value for any undelivered element included in these ME arrangements for software, we defer revenue until all elements are delivered and/or services have been performed, or until we have VSOE of fair value for all remaining undelivered elements. If the undelivered element is support and we do not have fair value for the support element, revenue for the entire arrangement is bundled and recognized ratably over the support period.

For ME arrangements containing both software and hardware, we allocate the arrangement fees to each element based on its relative selling price, which we establish using a selling price hierarchy. We determine the selling price of each element based on its VSOE, if available, third-party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.

We account for the majority of our digital cinema server sales as ME arrangements that may include up to three separate units, or elements, of accounting. The first element consists of our digital cinema server hardware and the accompanying software, which is essential to the functionality of the hardware. This element is typically delivered at the time of sale. The second element is the right to receive support and maintenance, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered over a service period subsequent to the initial sale. The third element is the right to receive specified upgrades, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered when a specified upgrade is available, subsequent to the initial sale. The application of the new revenue accounting standards to our digital cinema server sales typically results in the allocation of a substantial majority of the arrangement fees to the delivered hardware element based on its ESP, relative to the VSOE or ESP of the other elements, which we recognize as revenue at the time of sale. A small portion of the arrangement fees are allocated to the undelivered support and maintenance element, and in some cases to the undelivered specified upgrade element, based on the VSOE or ESP of each element. The portion of the arrangement fees allocated to the support and maintenance element is recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated service period, and the portion of the arrangement fees allocated to specified upgrades is recognized as revenue upon delivery of the upgrade.

Licensing. Our licensing revenue is primarily derived from royalties paid to us by licensees of our intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, and know-how. Royalties are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria have been met. We determine that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement upon the execution of a license agreement or upon the receipt of a licensee’s royalty report and payment. Royalties are deemed fixed or determinable upon verification of a licensee’s royalty report in accordance with the terms of the underlying executed agreement, or in certain circumstances, receipt of a licensee’s royalty report. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of the licensee’s recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter-of-credit between the licensee’s financial institution and our financial institution, and other factors. If we cannot determine that collectibility is probable, we recognize revenue upon receipt of cash, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Corrective royalty statements generally comprise less than 1% of our net licensing revenue and are recognized when received, or earlier if a reliable estimate can be made of an anticipated reduction in revenue from a prior royalty statement. An estimate of anticipated reduction in revenue based on historical negative correction royalty statements is also recorded. Deferred revenue represents amounts that are ultimately expected to be recognized as revenue, but for which not all revenue recognition criteria have been met. Licensing revenue includes fees we earn for administering joint patent licensing programs (“patent pools”) containing patents owned by us and/or other companies. Royalties related to patent pools are recorded net of royalties payable to third party patent pool members and are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria have been met.

We generate the majority of our licensing revenue through our licensing contracts with original equipment manufacturers (system licensees) and software vendors. Our revenue recognition policies for each of these arrangements are summarized below.

Licensing to system licensees. We license our technologies to system licensees who manufacture consumer electronics products and, in return, the system licensee pays us a royalty generally for each unit shipped that incorporates our technologies. Royalties from system licensees are generally recognized upon receipt of a royalty report from the licensee and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. In certain cases, our arrangements require the licensee to pay up-front, non-refundable royalties for units they may distribute in the future. These up-front arrangements are generally recognized upon contract execution, unless the arrangement includes extended payment terms or is considered a multiple element arrangement. In addition, in some cases we receive initial license fees for our technologies and provide post-contract support. In these cases we recognize the initial fees ratably over the expected support term.

Licensing to software vendors. We license our technologies for resale to software vendors and, in return, the software vendor pays us a royalty for each unit of software distributed that incorporates our technologies. Royalties from software vendors are generally recognized upon receipt of a royalty report from the licensee and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. In addition, in some cases we receive initial license fees for our technologies and provide post-contract upgrades and support. In these cases, we recognize the initial fees ratably over the expected support term, as vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value typically does not exist for the upgrade and support elements of the contract.

Product Sales. Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when the risk of ownership has transferred to our customer, as provided under the terms of the governing purchase agreement, and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Generally, these purchase agreements provide that the risk of ownership is transferred to the customer when the product is shipped, except in specific instances in which certain foreign regulations stipulate that the risk of ownership is transferred to the customer upon their receipt of the shipment. In these instances we recognize revenue when the product is received by the customer.

Services. Services revenues are recognized as completed and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of Revenue

Cost of licensing. Cost of licensing primarily consists of amortization expenses associated with purchased intangible assets and intangible assets acquired in business combinations. Cost of licensing also includes royalty obligations to third parties for the licensing of intellectual property rights that we sublicense as part of our licensing arrangements with our customers.

Cost of products. Cost of products primarily consists of the cost of materials related to products sold, applied labor, and manufacturing overhead. Our cost of products also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then include in our products.

Cost of services. Cost of services primarily consists of the personnel and personnel-related costs of employees performing our professional services, the cost of outside consultants, and reimbursable expenses incurred on behalf of customers.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

We measure expenses associated with all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair-value method and record such expense in our consolidated financial statements on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. See Note 6 “Stockholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation” for further discussion.

Advertising and Promotional Costs

Advertising and Promotional Costs

Advertising and promotional costs are charged to sales and marketing expense as incurred. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, these expenses were $20.0 million, $13.6 million, and $14.6 million, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation

Foreign Currency Translation

We maintain sales, marketing, and business operations in foreign countries. We translate the assets and liabilities of our international non-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period. Revenue and expenses of these subsidiaries are translated using the average rates for the period. Gains and losses from these translations are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

Certain of our foreign subsidiaries transact in currencies other than their functional currency. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, we re-measure non-functional currency assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries using the exchange rate at the end of each period and recognize gains and losses in our consolidated statements of operations. These gains and losses are recorded within other income. In fiscal 2012 and 2011, transaction and re-measurement gains included in net income were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, while fiscal 2010 transaction and re-measurement losses included in net income were $1.9 million.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method, under which deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwards are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be reversed. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is additionally dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets when uncertainty regarding their realizability exists.

We record an unrecognized tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. We include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within our provision for income taxes. To the extent accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued are reduced in the period that such determination is made and are reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.

In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, we initiated a policy to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our undistributed earnings in certain foreign subsidiaries. See Note 8 “Income Taxes” for further discussion.

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Inventories) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]
Raw materials	$ 4,403	$ 10,821
Work in process	0	2,942
Finished goods	12,297	12,481
Inventories	$ 16,700	$ 26,244

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Schedule Of Property, Plant, And Equipment, Estimated Useful Life) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012
Leasehold Improvements [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant, and equipment, useful life, years	Lesser of useful life or related lease term
Buildings [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant, and equipment, useful life, maximum, years	40
Machinery And Equipment [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant, and equipment, useful life, minimum, years	3
Property, plant, and equipment, useful life, maximum, years	8
Furniture And Fixtures [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant, and equipment, useful life, minimum, years	5
Property, plant, and equipment, useful life, maximum, years	8
Systems And Software [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant, and equipment, useful life, minimum, years	3
Property, plant, and equipment, useful life, maximum, years	5

XML

Income Taxes (Reconciliation Of Federal Statutory Tax Rate To Our Effective Tax Rate) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Federal statutory rate	35.00%	35.00%	35.00%
State income taxes, net of federal effect	1.10%	4.70%	3.20%
Stock-based compensation expense rate	(0.50%)	(0.30%)	0.10%
Research and development tax credits	(1.10%)	(1.60%)	(0.80%)
Tax exempt interest	(0.30%)	(0.30%)	(0.40%)
U.S. manufacturing tax incentives	(2.10%)	(1.90%)	(1.80%)
Foreign rate differential	5.30%	4.60%	0.10%
Foreign reversal of deferred tax liabilities	0.00%	2.50%	0.00%
Other	0.30%	0.40%	0.20%
Effective tax rate	28.10%	29.50%	35.20%

XML

Related Party Transactions (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Schedule Of Ownership Interest In The Consolidated Affiliated Entities

Our ownership interest in the consolidated affiliated entities is as follows:

Company Name	Ownership interest as of September 28, 2012
Dolby Properties, LLC	37.5	%
Dolby Properties Brisbane, LLC	49.0	%
Dolby Properties Burbank, LLC	49.0	%
Dolby Properties United Kingdom, LLC	49.0	%
Dolby Properties, LP	10.0	%

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]
Land	$ 48,227	$ 12,778
Buildings	27,266	26,623
Leasehold improvements	68,352	41,302
Machinery and equipment	29,070	20,845
Computer systems and software	86,266	62,897
Furniture and fixtures	13,158	10,113
Products provided under operating leases	0	1,060
Construction in progress	79,965	11,466
Property, plant and equipment, gross	352,304	187,084
Less: accumulated depreciation	(97,628)	(69,977)
Total long-lived tangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation	$ 254,676	$ 117,107

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation (Summary Of Stock Options Issued To Officers, Directors, And Employees Under 2000 Stock Incentive Plan And 2005 Stock Plan) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Outstanding [Roll Forward]
Shares, Options outstanding	5,801
Shares, Grants	2,603
Shares, Exercises	(456)
Shares, Forfeitures	(3,326)
Shares, Options outstanding	4,622
Shares, Options vested and expected to vest	4,437
Shares, Options exercisable	1,851
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options outstanding	$ 45.19
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Grants	$ 32.99
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercises	$ 26.52
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Forfeitures	$ 55.83
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options outstanding	$ 32.50
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options vested and expected to vest	$ 32.43
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options exercisable	$ 30.68
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life, Options outstanding	7,500
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life, Options vested and expected to vest at September 28, 2012	7,500
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life, Options exercisable	5,100
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Options outstanding	$ 12,752
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Options vested and expected to vest	12,577
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Options exercisable	$ 9,936

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Schedule Of Financial Liabilities Carried At Fair Value) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012		Sep. 30, 2011
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial liabilities carried at fair value	$ 2,140		$ 1,891
Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial liabilities carried at fair value	2,140		1,891
Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial liabilities carried at fair value	0		0
Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial liabilities carried at fair value	0		0
Investments Held In Supplemental Retirement Plan [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial liabilities carried at fair value	2,140	[1]	1,891	[1]
Investments Held In Supplemental Retirement Plan [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial liabilities carried at fair value	2,140	[1]	1,891	[1]
Investments Held In Supplemental Retirement Plan [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial liabilities carried at fair value	0	[1]	0	[1]
Investments Held In Supplemental Retirement Plan [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial liabilities carried at fair value	$ 0	[1]	$ 0	[1]

[1] These liabilities are included within accrued liabilities and within other non-current liabilities.

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Amortized Cost And Estimated Fair Value Of Short-Term And Long-Term Available-For-Sale Investments Based On Stated Maturities) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]
Amortized Cost, due within 1 year	$ 302,154	$ 390,559
Amortized Cost, due in 1 to 2 years	209,302	213,487
Amortized Cost, due in 2 to 3 years	151,174	58,947
Amortized Cost, total	662,630	662,993
Fair Value, due within 1 year	302,693	391,281
Fair Value, due in 1 to 2 years	209,871	213,921
Fair Value, due in 2 to 3 years	151,743	58,876
Fair Value, total	$ 664,307	$ 664,078

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Concentration of Credit Risk

Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash, cash equivalents, investments, and accounts receivable. Our investment portfolio consists of investment grade securities diversified amongst security types, industries, and issuers. All our securities are held in custody by a recognized financial institution. Our policy limits the amount of credit exposure to maximum of 5% to any one issuer, except for the U.S. Treasury, and we believe no significant concentration risk exists with respect to these investments. Our products are sold to businesses primarily in the Americas and Europe, and the majority of our licensing revenue is generated from customers outside of the U.S. We manage this risk by evaluating in advance the financial condition and creditworthiness of our products and services customers and performing regular evaluations of the creditworthiness of our licensing customers. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and fiscal 2010, one customer accounted for approximately 14%, 13%, and 12%, respectively, of our total revenue.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of funds held in general checking accounts, money market accounts, commercial paper, and U.S. agency notes.

Investments

All of our investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, with the exception of our investments held in our supplemental retirement plan, which are classified as trading. Investments that have an original maturity of 91 days or more at the date of purchase and a current maturity of less than one year are classified as short-term investments, while investments with a current maturity of more than one year are classified as long-term investments. Our investments are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, while realized gains and losses, other-than-temporary impairments, and credit losses are reported as a component of net income.

We evaluate our investment portfolio for credit losses and other-than-temporary impairments by comparing the fair value with the cost basis for each of our investment securities. An investment is impaired if the fair value is less than its cost basis. If any portion of the impairment is deemed to be the result of a credit loss, the credit loss portion of the impairment is included as a component of net income. If we deem it probable that we will not recover the full cost basis of the security, the security is other-than-temporarily impaired and the impairment loss is recognized as a component of net income.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We continually monitor customer payments and maintain a reserve for estimated losses resulting from our customers’ inability to make required payments. In determining the reserve, we evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based upon a variety of factors. In cases where we are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations, we record a specific allowance against amounts due, and thereby reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably believed to be collectible. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on our actual historical write-off experience in conjunction with the length of time the receivables are past due, customer creditworthiness, geographic risk, and the current business environment. Actual future losses from uncollectible accounts may differ from our estimates.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market (net realizable value). We evaluate our ending inventories for estimated excess quantities and obsolescence. Our evaluation includes the analysis of future sales demand by product within specific time horizons. Inventories in excess of projected future demand are written down to net realizable value. In addition, we assess the impact of changing technology on our inventory balances and write off inventories that are considered obsolete. Write-downs of inventory are recorded as a cost of products.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method based on estimated useful lives as follows:

Systems and software	3 to 5 years
Machinery and equipment	3 to 8 years
Furniture and fixtures	5 to 8 years
Leasehold improvements	Lesser of useful life or related lease term
Buildings	Up to 40 years

Internal Use Software

We account for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use by capitalizing costs of materials, consultants, personnel and personnel-related costs incurred in developing internal use computer software. These costs are included in property, plant and equipment, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages are charged to expense. Our capitalized internal use software costs are typically amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of three to five years.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Long-Lived Assets

We test goodwill for impairment annually during our third fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 which amends the rules for testing goodwill for impairment. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-08 for our annual goodwill impairment test performed in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

In performing the qualitative assessments, we consider events and circumstances, including but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, changes in management or key personnel, changes in strategy, changes in customers, changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting unit's net assets and changes in the price of our common stock. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, then the two-step goodwill impairment test is not performed.

If the two-step goodwill test is performed, we evaluate and test our goodwill for impairment at a reporting-unit level using expected future cash flows to be generated by the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill over the calculated fair value of the goodwill. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below. Our operating segments are aligned with the management principles of our business.

We completed our annual goodwill impairment assessment in the fiscal quarter ended June 29, 2012. At the time of our annual goodwill impairment test for fiscal 2012, we had two reporting units: Via, which corresponds to our wholly owned subsidiary and has no assigned goodwill, and Dolby Entertainment Technology ("DET"), with goodwill of $263.5 million. We determined, after assessing the totality of the events and circumstances described above, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount. Accordingly, there was no indication of impairment and the two-step goodwill impairment test was not performed. We did not recognize any goodwill impairment losses in fiscal 2012, 2011, or 2010.

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Our intangible assets principally consist of acquired technology, patents, trademarks, customer relationships, and contracts, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives ranging from two to seventeen years.

We review long-lived assets, including intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or a change in circumstances indicate an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparing its carrying value to the total future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If it is determined that an asset is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. See Note 3 “Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions” for a discussion of impairment charges recognized in fiscal 2010.

Revenue Recognition

We enter into revenue arrangements with our customers to license technology, trademarks, and know-how and to sell products and services. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Judgment is required to assess whether collectibility is probable. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of our customer's recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter of credit between the customer's financial institution and our financial institution, and other factors. Some of our revenue arrangements include multiple elements, such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services.

Multiple Element Arrangements. We evaluate each element in a multiple element (“ME”) arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value and delivery of an undelivered element is both probable and within our control. When these criteria are not met, the delivered and undelivered elements are combined and the arrangement fees are allocated to this combined single unit.

If the unit separation criteria are met, we account for each element within a ME arrangement (such as hardware, software, maintenance, and other services) separately, and we allocate fees from the arrangement based on the relative selling price of each element. For some arrangements, customers receive certain elements over a period of time, after delivery of the initial product. These elements may include support and maintenance and/or the right to receive upgrades. Revenue allocated to the undelivered element is recognized either over its estimated service period or when the upgrade is delivered. We do not recognize revenue that is contingent upon the future delivery of products or services or upon future performance obligations. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when we have completed all contractual obligations.

We determine our best estimate of the selling price for an individual element within a ME revenue arrangement using the same methods used to determine the selling price of an element sold on a standalone basis. If we sell the element on a standalone basis, we estimate the selling price by considering actual sales prices. Otherwise, we estimate the selling price by considering internal factors such as pricing practices and margin objectives. Consideration is also given to market conditions such as competitor pricing strategies, customer demands, and industry technology lifecycles. Management applies judgment to establish margin objectives, pricing strategies, and technology lifecycles.

Revenue recognition for transactions which involve software, such as fees we earn from certain system licensees, requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for those elements. For some of our ME arrangements, customers receive certain elements of the arrangement over a period of time or after delivery of the initial software. These elements may include support and maintenance. The fair values of these elements are recognized over the estimated period for which these elements will be delivered, which is sometimes the estimated life of the software. If we do not have VSOE of fair value for any undelivered element included in these ME arrangements for software, we defer revenue until all elements are delivered and/or services have been performed, or until we have VSOE of fair value for all remaining undelivered elements. If the undelivered element is support and we do not have fair value for the support element, revenue for the entire arrangement is bundled and recognized ratably over the support period.

For ME arrangements containing both software and hardware, we allocate the arrangement fees to each element based on its relative selling price, which we establish using a selling price hierarchy. We determine the selling price of each element based on its VSOE, if available, third-party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.

We account for the majority of our digital cinema server sales as ME arrangements that may include up to three separate units, or elements, of accounting. The first element consists of our digital cinema server hardware and the accompanying software, which is essential to the functionality of the hardware. This element is typically delivered at the time of sale. The second element is the right to receive support and maintenance, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered over a service period subsequent to the initial sale. The third element is the right to receive specified upgrades, which is included with the purchase of the hardware element and is typically delivered when a specified upgrade is available, subsequent to the initial sale. The application of the new revenue accounting standards to our digital cinema server sales typically results in the allocation of a substantial majority of the arrangement fees to the delivered hardware element based on its ESP, relative to the VSOE or ESP of the other elements, which we recognize as revenue at the time of sale. A small portion of the arrangement fees are allocated to the undelivered support and maintenance element, and in some cases to the undelivered specified upgrade element, based on the VSOE or ESP of each element. The portion of the arrangement fees allocated to the support and maintenance element is recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated service period, and the portion of the arrangement fees allocated to specified upgrades is recognized as revenue upon delivery of the upgrade.

Licensing. Our licensing revenue is primarily derived from royalties paid to us by licensees of our intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, and know-how. Royalties are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria have been met. We determine that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement upon the execution of a license agreement or upon the receipt of a licensee’s royalty report and payment. Royalties are deemed fixed or determinable upon verification of a licensee’s royalty report in accordance with the terms of the underlying executed agreement, or in certain circumstances, receipt of a licensee’s royalty report. We determine collectibility based on an evaluation of the licensee’s recent payment history, the existence of a standby letter-of-credit between the licensee’s financial institution and our financial institution, and other factors. If we cannot determine that collectibility is probable, we recognize revenue upon receipt of cash, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Corrective royalty statements generally comprise less than 1% of our net licensing revenue and are recognized when received, or earlier if a reliable estimate can be made of an anticipated reduction in revenue from a prior royalty statement. An estimate of anticipated reduction in revenue based on historical negative correction royalty statements is also recorded. Deferred revenue represents amounts that are ultimately expected to be recognized as revenue, but for which not all revenue recognition criteria have been met. Licensing revenue includes fees we earn for administering joint patent licensing programs (“patent pools”) containing patents owned by us and/or other companies. Royalties related to patent pools are recorded net of royalties payable to third party patent pool members and are recognized when all revenue recognition criteria have been met.

We generate the majority of our licensing revenue through our licensing contracts with original equipment manufacturers (system licensees) and software vendors. Our revenue recognition policies for each of these arrangements are summarized below.

Licensing to system licensees. We license our technologies to system licensees who manufacture consumer electronics products and, in return, the system licensee pays us a royalty generally for each unit shipped that incorporates our technologies. Royalties from system licensees are generally recognized upon receipt of a royalty report from the licensee and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. In certain cases, our arrangements require the licensee to pay up-front, non-refundable royalties for units they may distribute in the future. These up-front arrangements are generally recognized upon contract execution, unless the arrangement includes extended payment terms or is considered a multiple element arrangement. In addition, in some cases we receive initial license fees for our technologies and provide post-contract support. In these cases we recognize the initial fees ratably over the expected support term.

Licensing to software vendors. We license our technologies for resale to software vendors and, in return, the software vendor pays us a royalty for each unit of software distributed that incorporates our technologies. Royalties from software vendors are generally recognized upon receipt of a royalty report from the licensee and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. In addition, in some cases we receive initial license fees for our technologies and provide post-contract upgrades and support. In these cases, we recognize the initial fees ratably over the expected support term, as vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value typically does not exist for the upgrade and support elements of the contract.

Product Sales. Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when the risk of ownership has transferred to our customer, as provided under the terms of the governing purchase agreement, and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Generally, these purchase agreements provide that the risk of ownership is transferred to the customer when the product is shipped, except in specific instances in which certain foreign regulations stipulate that the risk of ownership is transferred to the customer upon their receipt of the shipment. In these instances we recognize revenue when the product is received by the customer.

Services. Services revenues are recognized as completed and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of licensing. Cost of licensing primarily consists of amortization expenses associated with purchased intangible assets and intangible assets acquired in business combinations. Cost of licensing also includes royalty obligations to third parties for the licensing of intellectual property rights that we sublicense as part of our licensing arrangements with our customers.

Cost of products. Cost of products primarily consists of the cost of materials related to products sold, applied labor, and manufacturing overhead. Our cost of products also includes third-party royalty obligations paid to license intellectual property that we then include in our products.

Cost of services. Cost of services primarily consists of the personnel and personnel-related costs of employees performing our professional services, the cost of outside consultants, and reimbursable expenses incurred on behalf of customers.

Stock-Based Compensation

We measure expenses associated with all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair-value method and record such expense in our consolidated financial statements on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. See Note 6 “Stockholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation” for further discussion.

Advertising and Promotional Costs

Advertising and promotional costs are charged to sales and marketing expense as incurred. In fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, these expenses were $20.0 million, $13.6 million, and $14.6 million, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation

We maintain sales, marketing, and business operations in foreign countries. We translate the assets and liabilities of our international non-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period. Revenue and expenses of these subsidiaries are translated using the average rates for the period. Gains and losses from these translations are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

Certain of our foreign subsidiaries transact in currencies other than their functional currency. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in our consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, we re-measure non-functional currency assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries using the exchange rate at the end of each period and recognize gains and losses in our consolidated statements of operations. These gains and losses are recorded within other income. In fiscal 2012 and 2011, transaction and re-measurement gains included in net income were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, while fiscal 2010 transaction and re-measurement losses included in net income were $1.9 million.

Income Taxes

We use the asset and liability method, under which deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwards are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be reversed. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is additionally dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets when uncertainty regarding their realizability exists.

We record an unrecognized tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. We include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within our provision for income taxes. To the extent accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued are reduced in the period that such determination is made and are reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.

In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, we initiated a policy to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our undistributed earnings in certain foreign subsidiaries. See Note 8 “Income Taxes” for further discussion.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that (1) eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity; (2) requires the consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income; and (3) requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income to net income. This new standard does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income, nor does it affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. The new standard is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. This standard will result only in changes in our financial statement presentation.

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended							12 Months Ended					12 Months Ended								4 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	7 Months Ended	12 Months Ended			4 Months Ended	7 Months Ended	12 Months Ended			1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		7 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010	Sep. 28, 2012 Class A Common Stock [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Class A Common Stock [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Class B Common Stock [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Class B Common Stock [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Stock Based Compensation [Member] Y	Sep. 30, 2011 Stock Based Compensation [Member]	Sep. 24, 2010 Stock Based Compensation [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. [Member] Class B Common Stock [Member] Y	Sep. 28, 2012 2005 Stock Plan. [Member] Class A Common Stock [Member] Y	Sep. 28, 2012 Awards Granted Under 2005 Stock Plan Prior To February 2011 [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Awards Granted Under 2005 Stock Plan From February 2011 [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member]	Sep. 24, 2010 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Restricted Stock Units [Member] Y	Sep. 30, 2011 Restricted Stock Units [Member]	Sep. 24, 2010 Restricted Stock Units [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]	Mar. 30, 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]	May 14, 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]	Sep. 24, 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member] Class A Common Stock [Member]	May 14, 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member] Class A Common Stock [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Employee Stock Option [Member] Options Granted Prior To June 2008 [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Employee Stock Option [Member] Options Granted From June 2008 [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Employee Stock Option [Member] Options Granted From June 2008 [Member]	Aug. 10, 2012 Option Exchange Program [Member] option_holder	Sep. 28, 2012 Option Exchange Program [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Minimum [Member] Option Exchange Program [Member]	May 14, 2012 Maximum [Member] Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member] Class A Common Stock [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Maximum [Member] Option Exchange Program [Member]
Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	$ 400,000	$ 600,000	$ 800,000
Common stock, shares authorized				500,000,000	500,000,000	500,000,000	500,000,000
Common stock, shares issued				46,496,635	51,860,546	56,598,829	57,559,554
Common stock, shares outstanding				46,496,635	51,860,546	56,598,829	57,559,554
Shares authorized under plan											15,100,000	21,000,000
Options granted under the plan	2,603,000
Options outstanding to purchase	4,622,000	5,801,000									200,000	4,400,000
Remaining weighted-average contractual life	7,500										1.7	7.8
Terms for issuance of stock													2	1.6
Options vested and exercisable												1,700,000
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense	352,000	635,000	827,000
Recognized tax benefit from the exercise of ISO and ESPP	200,000	300,000	1,200,000
Options vesting period											4 years																			4 years				1 year		4 years
Options expiration period											10 years
Percentage of vesting per year	50.00%
Options expiration period, years																													10	10
Expiration period after termination of service, months																													3	3
Percentage of stock option becoming exercisable subjected to date of grant																														25.00%
Options maximum vesting period, months																															36 months
Share based compensation expense	47,581,000	43,665,000	28,815,000												50,000	(304,000)	447,000	22,952,000	18,339,000	9,560,000				1,029,000	842,000	673,000							2,100,000
Estimated forfeiture rate based on evaluation of historical forfeitures								6.13%	6.10%	5.69%
Stock options expected to vest								54,100,000										57,000,000
Fair value of restricted stock units vested																		14,200,000	15,500,000	10,300,000
Employee stock options expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period								2.6										2.8
Year end stock price	$ 32.75
Grants in period	2,157,000																															783,443
Employee stock options expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period	7,500
Percentage of compensation withheld by employees to purchase common stock																					10.00%		10.00%
Maximum value of common stock available for eligible employees																											25,000	25,000
Maximum number of common stock available for eligible employees																											1,000								1,000
Common stock purchase price determined over percentage of closing price																						15.00%
Accrued liabilities included in employee withholdings.	116,092,000	117,035,000
Range of exercise price lower limit																																	$ 45.83
Number of eligible option holder participants																																705
Outstanding stock options exchanged																																2,665,986
Recorded incremental charge related to exchange	$ 47,581,000	$ 43,665,000	$ 28,815,000

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012 sqft	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Raw materials	$ 4,403,000	$ 10,821,000
Assets held for sale		1,500,000
Depreciation	30,600,000	24,100,000	17,800,000
Square Footage of real estate property	354,000
Purchase price of property	109,800,000
Asset impairment charges	0	0	9,594,000
Impairment charges included in net income attributable to controlling interest			1,700,000
Amortization expense for intangible assets	13,200,000	19,800,000	17,300,000
VAT release related estimated penalties		3,200,000
Interest related to VAT reserves		1,400,000
Percentage Of Revenue From Material Customer	14.00%	13.00%	12.00%
Land [Member]
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Purchase price of property	35,500,000
Asset impairment charges			1,100,000
Buildings [Member]
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Purchase price of property	74,300,000
Asset impairment charges			2,300,000
Other Noncurrent Assets [Member]
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Raw materials	6,500,000
Customer Concentration Risk [Member] | Sales Revenue, Goods, Net [Member]
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Amount	$ 126,700,000	$ 124,500,000	$ 113,300,000

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Abstract]

Schedule Of Financial Assets Carried At Fair Value

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891
Money market funds (2)	142,038		—		—		142,038
Corporate bonds (3)	—		176,958		—		176,958
Municipal debt securities (3)	—		472,201		—		472,201
U.S. agency securities (2), (3)	29,919		—		—		29,919
Total	$	173,848	$	649,159	$	—	$	823,007

(1) These assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets and within other non-current assets.

(2) These assets are included within cash and cash equivalents.

(3) These assets are included within short-term investments and within long-term investments.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	2,140	$	—	$	—	$	2,140
Money market funds (2)	17,090		—		—		17,090
Commercial paper (2), (3)	—		24,299		—		24,299
Corporate bonds (3)	—		220,236		—		220,236
Municipal debt securities (2), (3)	—		401,648		—		401,648
U.S. agency securities (3)	25,012		—		—		25,012
Total	$	44,242	$	646,183	$	—	$	690,425

(1) These assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets and within other non-current assets.

(2) These assets are included within cash and cash equivalents.

(3) These assets are included within short-term investments and within long-term investments.

Schedule Of Financial Liabilities Carried At Fair Value

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891
Total	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891

(1) These liabilities are included within accrued liabilities and within other non-current liabilities.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	2,140	$	—	$	—	$	2,140
Total	$	2,140	$	—	$	—	$	2,140

(1) These liabilities are included within accrued liabilities and within other non-current liabilities.

XML

Acquisitions (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Schedule of Recognized Identified Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes the allocation of total consideration to the total fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

	Total
	(in thousands)
Current assets	$	1,289
Property, plant and equipment, net	264
Intangible assets, net
Developed technology	12,649
Trade name	590
Goodwill	15,988
Current liabilities	(9,674		)
Deferred taxes, net	(2,721		)
Non-current liabilities	(22		)
Total purchase price	$	18,363

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Accrued Liabilities) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]
Accrued royalties	$ 2,391	$ 1,947
Amounts payable to joint licensing program partners	35,492	42,502
Accrued compensation and benefits	47,331	41,168
Accrued professional fees	4,893	5,727
Other accrued liabilities	25,985	25,691
Accrued liabilities	$ 116,092	$ 117,035

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Cash, Cash Equivalents, And Investments) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified																									12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010	Sep. 25, 2009	Sep. 28, 2012 Money Market Funds [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Money Market Funds [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 U.S. Agency Securities [Member]		Sep. 30, 2011 U.S. Agency Securities [Member]		Sep. 28, 2012 Commercial Paper [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Commercial Paper [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Municipal Debt Securities, Short-Term [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Municipal Debt Securities, Short-Term [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Municipal Debt Securities, Long-Term [Member]		Sep. 30, 2011 Municipal Debt Securities, Long-Term [Member]		Sep. 28, 2012 Corporate Bonds [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Corporate Bonds [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Corporate Bonds [Member]		Sep. 30, 2011 Corporate Bonds [Member]		Sep. 28, 2012 Minimum [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Maximum [Member]
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Cash	$ 468,622	$ 394,474
Cash equivalents					17,090	142,038	0		15,000		4,885	0	2,003	0
Cash and cash equivalents	492,600	551,512	545,861	451,678
Short-term investments	302,693	391,281					3,999		8,074		19,414	0	172,037	330,562					107,243	52,645
Long-term investments	361,614	272,797					21,013	[1]	6,845	[1]					227,608	[1]	141,639	[1]			112,993	[1]	124,313	[1]
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments	$ 1,156,907	$ 1,215,590
Long-Term investments, maturities																									1 year	3 years

[1] Our long-term investments have maturities that range from one to three years.

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Schedule Of Stock-Based Compensation Expense By Plan

Stock-based compensation expense recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012 (2)			September 30, 2011 (2)			September 24, 2010 (2)
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation:
Stock options (1)	$	23,550		$	24,788		$	18,135
Restricted stock units	22,952			18,339			9,560
Employee stock purchase plan	1,029			842			673
Stock appreciation rights	50			(304		)	447
Total stock-based compensation	47,581			43,665			28,815
Benefit from income taxes	(14,930		)	(14,744		)	(9,805		)
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax	$	32,651		$	28,921		$	19,010

(1) Expense excludes $0.4 million in fiscal 2012, $0.6 million in fiscal 2011, and $0.8 million in fiscal 2010 related to stock-based compensation which was capitalized to property, plant and equipment.

(2) We also recognized $0.2 million, $0.3 million, and $1.2 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, of tax benefit from certain exercises of incentive stock options and shares issued under our ESPP, which is not included in the table above.

Schedule of Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation expense was classified as follows:
Cost of products	$	675	$	642	$	427
Cost of services	239		182		126
Research and development	11,553		10,157		6,535
Sales and marketing	16,233		13,184		8,843
General and administrative	18,881		19,500		12,884
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	47,581	$	43,665	$	28,815

Schedule Of Fair Value Of Stock-Based Awards Estimated Using Weighted-Average Assumptions

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of employee stock options at the date of grant. The fair value of our stock options was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
Expected term (in years)	4.53		4.40		4.66
Risk-free interest rate	0.7	%	1.5	%	2.2	%
Expected stock price volatility	43.8	%	41.4	%	41.7	%
Dividend yield	—		—		—

Summary Of Weighted-Average Fair Value Of Stock Options Granted And Total Intrinsic Value Of Stock Options Exercised

The following table summarizes the weighted-average fair value of stock options granted and the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
Weighted-average fair value at date of grant	$	12.23	$	22.31	$	19.93
Intrinsic value of options exercised (in thousands)	6,188		46,649		79,453

Summary Of Stock Options Issued To Officers, Directors, And Employees Under 2000 Stock Incentive Plan And 2005 Stock Plan

The following table summarizes information about stock options issued to officers, directors, and employees under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2005 Stock Plan:

	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)				(in years)	(in thousands)
Options outstanding at September 30, 2011	5,801		$	45.19
Grants	2,603		32.99
Exercises	(456	)	26.52
Forfeitures and cancellations	(3,326	)	55.83
Options outstanding at September 28, 2012	4,622		32.50		7.5	$	12,752
Options vested and expected to vest at September 28, 2012	4,437		32.43		7.5	12,577
Options exercisable at September 28, 2012	1,851		30.68		5.1	9,936

Summary Of Stock Options Outstanding And Exercisable

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 28, 2012:

	Outstanding Options				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Shares	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price
	(in thousands)	(in years)			(in thousands)
$1.26 - $1.26	12	0.1	$	1.26	12	$	1.26
$2.08 - $6.28	98	1.6	2.08		98	2.08
$6.29 - $19.21	238	2.5	15.43		238	15.43
$19.22 - 28.12	159	7.2	25.85		59	22.45
$28.13 - $38.20	3,368	8.0	31.89		1,092	31.48
$38.21 - $48.14	481	8.7	42.90		120	42.31
$48.15 - $51.18	117	5.5	48.22		115	48.19
$51.19 and above	149	7.8	57.36		117	56.31
	4,622				1,851

Summary Of Restricted Stock Units Issued To Officers, Directors And Employees Under 2005 Stock Incentive Plan

The following table summarizes information about restricted stock units issued to officers, directors, and employees under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan:

	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Non-vested at September 30, 2011	946		$	53.71
Granted	2,157		33.91
Vested	(387	)	50.78
Forfeitures	(144	)	45.90
Non-vested at September 28, 2012	2,572		37.98

XML

Restructuring (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Restructuring Charges [Abstract]

Schedule Of Changes In Restructuring Accruals

Changes in our restructuring accruals in fiscal 2012 and 2011, which were included within accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively, were as follows:

	Severance			Facilities and contract termination costs			Fixed assets write-off			Other associated costs			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	2,804		$	—		$	—		$	230		$	3,034
Restructuring charges	3,185			—			199			22			3,406
Cash payments	(3,716		)	—			—			(131		)	(3,847		)
Non-cash charges	(23		)	—			(199		)	(1		)	(223		)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	2,250		$	—		$	—		$	120		$	2,370
Restructuring charges	318			352			424			97			1,191
Cash payments	(2,572		)	(185		)	—			(201		)	(2,958		)
Non-cash charges	4			164			(424		)	(14		)	(270		)
Balance at September 28, 2012	$	—		$	331		$	—		$	2		$	333

XML

Basis Of Presentation

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Basis Of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dolby Laboratories and our wholly owned subsidiaries. In addition, we have consolidated the financial results of jointly owned affiliated companies in which our principal stockholder has a controlling interest. We report these controlling interests as a separate line in our consolidated statements of operations as net (income) / loss attributable to controlling interest and in our consolidated balance sheets as controlling interest. We eliminate all intercompany accounts and transactions upon consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include estimated selling prices for elements sold in multiple-element revenue arrangements, valuation allowances for accounts receivable, carrying values of inventories and certain property, plant, and equipment, products provided under operating leases, goodwill, intangible assets, stock-based compensation, fair values of investments, accrued expenses, including liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, and deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year is a 52 or 53 week period ending on the last Friday in September. The fiscal years presented herein include the 52 week periods ended September 28, 2012 (fiscal 2012) and September 24, 2010 (fiscal 2010) and the 53 week period ended September 30, 2011 (fiscal 2011).

Reclassifications

We have reclassified certain prior year amounts within our consolidated statements of stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and within investing and financing activities of our consolidated statements of cash flows to conform to our current year presentation. These reclassifications did not affect total revenue, operating income, operating cash flows, or net income.

XML

Income Taxes (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Components Of Income Before Provision For Income Taxes

The components of our income before provision for income taxes are as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
U.S.	$	258,684	$	350,189	$	401,936
Foreign	110,307		90,454		35,076
Total	$	368,991	$	440,643	$	437,012

Schedule Of Provision For Income Taxes

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Current:
Federal	$	56,105		$	71,336		$	109,050
State	2,922			18,069			18,382
Foreign	43,659			33,567			41,942
Total current	102,686			122,972			169,374
Deferred:
Federal	904			3,638			(12,790		)
State	521			9,756			(1,149		)
Foreign	(254		)	(6,305		)	(1,250		)
Total deferred	1,171			7,089			(15,189		)
Provision for income taxes	$	103,857		$	130,061		$	154,185

Summary Of Tax Effects Of The Temporary Differences Between Carrying Amounts And Amounts Used For Tax

A summary of the tax effects of the temporary differences is as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Deferred income tax assets:
Investments	$	2,096		$	1,932
Accounts receivable	182			417
Inventories	3,678			3,304
Net operating loss	2,863			2,987
U.S. state taxes	177			5,749
Accrued expenses	10,140			9,216
Stock-based compensation	25,720			19,547
Revenue recognition	63,843			67,154
Foreign tax credits	3,410			3,528
Other	7,338			6,040
Total gross deferred income tax assets	119,447			119,874
Less: valuation allowance	—			—
Total deferred income tax assets	119,447			119,874
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Translation adjustment	(904		)	(837		)
Intangibles	(3,746		)	(595		)
International earnings	(6,373		)	(1,485		)
Depreciation and amortization	(6,761		)	(11,422		)
Unrealized gain on investments	(768		)	(558		)
Deferred income tax assets, net	$	100,895		$	104,977
The above deferred income tax assets, net have been classified in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Current deferred income tax assets	$	80,956		$	90,869
Long-term deferred income tax assets, net	19,939			14,108
Deferred income tax assets, net	$	100,895		$	104,977

Reconciliation Of Federal Statutory Tax Rate To Our Effective Tax Rate

A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to our effective tax rate for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 is as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
Federal statutory rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
State income taxes, net of federal effect	1.1		4.7		3.2
Stock-based compensation expense rate	0.5		0.3		(0.1	)
Research and development tax credits	(1.1	)	(1.6	)	(0.8	)
Tax exempt interest	(0.3	)	(0.3	)	(0.4	)
U.S. manufacturing tax incentives	(2.1	)	(1.9	)	(1.8	)
Foreign rate differential	(5.3	)	(4.6	)	(0.1	)
Foreign reversal of deferred tax liabilities	—		(2.5	)	—
Other	0.3		0.4		0.2
Effective tax rate	28.1	%	29.5	%	35.2	%

Aggregate Changes In Balance Of Gross Unrecognized Tax Benefits, Excluding Interest And Penalties

The aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were as follows:

	(in thousands)
Balance at September 25, 2009	$	16,916
Lapse of statute of limitations	(2,143		)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	—
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	520
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	1,265
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	16,558
Lapse of statute of limitations	(1,097		)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	(8,083		)
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	1,006
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	299
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	8,683
Lapse of statute of limitations	(1,236		)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	(493		)
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	3,156
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	6,770
Balance at September 28, 2012	$	16,880

XML

Common Stock Repurchase Program (Narrative) (Details) (Class A Common Stock [Member], USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		0 Months Ended	1 Months Ended
	Nov. 30, 2009	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 28, 2012	Jul. 26, 2011 Additional Stock Approved [Member]	Feb. 29, 2012 Additional Stock Approved [Member]	Jul. 31, 2010 Additional Stock Approved [Member]
Equity, Class Of Treasury Stock [Line Items]
Stock authorized for repurchase	$ 250.0	$ 900.0		$ 250.0	$ 100.0	$ 300.0
Stock Repurchase Program, Remaining Number of Shares Authorized to be Repurchased			198.3

XML

Basis Of Presentation (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012 week	Sep. 30, 2011 week	Sep. 24, 2010 week
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Number of weeks in fiscal year	52	53	52
Minimum [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Number of weeks in fiscal year	52
Maximum [Member]
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Number of weeks in fiscal year	53

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Intangible Assets) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Cost	$ 130,817	$ 118,730
Accumulated Amortization	(74,291)	(67,157)
Net	56,526	51,573
Acquired Patents And Technology [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Cost	79,213	61,611
Accumulated Amortization	(40,071)	(32,146)
Net	39,142	29,465
Customer Relationships [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Cost	30,679	30,748
Accumulated Amortization	(16,386)	(12,821)
Net	14,293	17,927
Customer Contracts [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Cost	0	6,063
Accumulated Amortization	0	(6,063)
Other Intangibles [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Cost	20,925	20,308
Accumulated Amortization	(17,834)	(16,127)
Net	$ 3,091	$ 4,181

XML

Income Taxes (Components Of Income Before Provision For Income Taxes) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Jun. 29, 2012	Mar. 30, 2012	Dec. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jul. 01, 2011	Apr. 01, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
U.S.									$ 258,684	$ 350,189	$ 401,936
Foreign									110,307	90,454	35,076
Income before provision for income taxes	$ 72,951	$ 70,321	$ 122,515	$ 103,204	$ 116,632	$ 90,451	$ 122,494	$ 111,066	$ 368,991	$ 440,643	$ 437,012

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 492,600	$ 551,512
Short-term investments	302,693	391,281
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $956 at September 28, 2012 and $2,466 at September 30, 2011	43,495	61,815
Inventories	16,700	26,244
Deferred taxes	80,966	90,869
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	33,832	36,877
Total current assets	970,286	1,158,598
Long-term investments	361,614	272,797
Property, plant and equipment, net	254,676	117,107
Intangible assets, net	56,526	51,573
Goodwill	281,375	263,260
Deferred taxes	22,634	14,779
Other non-current assets	13,687	6,273
Total assets	1,960,798	1,884,387
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accounts payable	14,831	10,887
Accrued liabilities	116,092	117,035
Income taxes payable	2,424	4,762
Deferred revenue	23,493	26,701
Total current liabilities	156,840	159,385
Long-term deferred revenue	18,192	15,526
Deferred taxes	2,696	671
Other non-current liabilities	39,837	23,455
Total liabilities	217,565	199,037
Stockholders' equity:
Additional paid-in capital	0	210,681
Retained earnings	1,709,479	1,445,189
Accumulated other comprehensive income	10,687	7,533
Total stockholders' equity-Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	1,720,269	1,663,513
Controlling interest	22,964	21,837
Total stockholders' equity	1,743,233	1,685,350
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	1,960,798	1,884,387
Class A Common Stock [Member]
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock	46	52
Class B Common Stock [Member]
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock	$ 57	$ 58

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Investment Portfolio Recorded As Cash Equivalents, Short-Term Investments, And Long-Term Investments) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Investment Holdings [Line Items]
Cost	$ 686,609	$ 820,030
Unrealized Gain	1,736	1,632
Unrealized Loss	(60)	(546)
Estimated Fair Value	688,285	821,116
Money Market Funds [Member]
Investment Holdings [Line Items]
Cost	17,090	142,038
Unrealized Gain	0	0
Unrealized Loss	0	0
Estimated Fair Value	17,090	142,038
Municipal Debt Securities [Member]
Investment Holdings [Line Items]
Cost	400,958	471,005
Unrealized Gain	728	1,251
Unrealized Loss	(38)	(55)
Estimated Fair Value	401,648	472,201
U.S. Agency Securities [Member]
Investment Holdings [Line Items]
Cost	24,997	29,858
Unrealized Gain	18	65
Unrealized Loss	(3)	(4)
Estimated Fair Value	25,012	29,919
Commercial Paper [Member]
Investment Holdings [Line Items]
Cost	24,299
Unrealized Gain	0
Unrealized Loss	0
Estimated Fair Value	24,299
Corporate Bonds [Member]
Investment Holdings [Line Items]
Cost	219,265	177,129
Unrealized Gain	990	316
Unrealized Loss	(19)	(487)
Estimated Fair Value	$ 220,236	$ 176,958

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Stockholders' Equity And Comprehensive Income (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Translation adjustments, tax	$ 30	$ 2	$ 2,654
Unrealized gains(losses) on available-for-sale securities, tax	$ (210)	$ 599	$ 379

XML

Acquisitions (Purchase Price Allocation) (Details) (IMM Sound, S.A. [Member], USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jul. 19, 2012
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Current assets	$ 1,289
Property, plant and equipment, net	264
Goodwill	15,988
Current liabilities	(9,674)
Deferred taxes, net	(2,721)
Non-current liabilities	(22)
Total purchase price	18,363
Developed Technology [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Intangible assets, net	12,649
Trade Name [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Intangible assets, net	$ 590

XML

Common Stock Repurchase Program (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Disclosure of Repurchase Agreements [Abstract]

Schedule Of Stock Repurchased Under Stock Repurchased Program

Stock repurchase activity under the stock repurchase program during fiscal 2012 is summarized as follows:

	Shares Repurchased	Cost (in thousands) (1)		Average Price Paid per Share (2)
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended December 30, 2011	885,969	$	26,068	$	29.41
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012	1,575,891	$	60,081	$	38.11
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended June 29, 2012	2,545,699	$	103,810	$	40.76
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2012	2,205,433	$	78,244	$	35.46
Total	7,212,992	$	268,203

(1) Cost of share repurchases includes the price paid per share and applicable commissions.

(2) Excludes commission costs.

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation (Schedule Of Fair Value Of Stock-Based Awards Estimated Using Weighted-Average Assumptions) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]
Expected life (in years)	4.53	4.40	4.66
Risk-free interest rate	0.70%	1.50%	2.20%
Expected stock price volatility	43.80%	41.40%	41.70%
Dividend yield	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

XML

Related Party Transactions

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions

We lease our primary San Francisco corporate offices from our principal stockholder. The current lease expires on December 31, 2013, but we have the option to renew the lease for two additional five-year terms. Related party rent expense included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2012 , 2011, and 2010 was $1.4 million, $1.4 million, and $1.4 million, respectively.

We are the managing member or general partner in entities which own and lease commercial property in the U.S. and United Kingdom. Our principal stockholder is the limited member or limited partner, but with a majority economic interest, in each of these entities. These entities were established for the purposes of purchasing and leasing commercial property primarily for our own use. While a portion of the property is leased to third parties, we occupy a majority of the space. Therefore, given that these affiliated entities are an integrated part of our operations, we have consolidated the entities’ assets and liabilities and results of operations in our consolidated financial statements. The share of earnings and net assets of the entities attributable to the limited member or limited partner, as the case may be, is reflected as controlling interest in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These entities distributed less than $0.1 million to our principal stockholder in fiscal 2012, and approximately $0.3 million and $0.3 million in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. During fiscal 2010, we paid off in full the debt used to finance the purchases of property.

Our ownership interest in the consolidated affiliated entities is as follows:

Company Name	Ownership interest as of September 28, 2012
Dolby Properties, LLC	37.5	%
Dolby Properties Brisbane, LLC	49.0	%
Dolby Properties Burbank, LLC	49.0	%
Dolby Properties United Kingdom, LLC	49.0	%
Dolby Properties, LP	10.0	%

XML

Comprehensive Income (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, Attributable to Parent [Abstract]

Components Of Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income were as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Net income including controlling interest	$	265,134		$	310,582		$	282,827
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax	3,082			509			(1,290		)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax	380			(907		)	(622		)
Comprehensive income	268,596			310,184			280,915
Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to controlling interest	(1,140		)	(1,185		)	792
Comprehensive income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	267,456		$	308,999		$	281,707

Schedule of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the following:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Accumulated foreign currency translation gains, net of tax of ($2,623) and ($2,653)	$	9,608	$	6,834
Accumulated unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($597) and ($387)	1,079		699
Total accumulated other comprehensive income	$	10,687	$	7,533

XML

Per Share Data

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Per Share Data

Per Share Data

We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period. For diluted earnings per share, we divide net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding and the potential number of dilutive shares of Class A and Class B common stock outstanding during the period.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	264,302	$	309,267	$	283,447
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic	106,926		111,444		113,452
Potential common shares from options to purchase Class A and Class B common stock	493		941		1,769
Potential common shares from restricted stock units	122		169		167
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted	107,541		112,554		115,388
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.—basic	$	2.47	$	2.78	$	2.50
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.—diluted	$	2.46	$	2.75	$	2.46
Antidilutive options excluded from calculation	6,496		3,289		2,074
Antidilutive restricted stock units excluded from calculation	2,550		535		457

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation (Summary Of Stock Options Outstanding And Exercisable) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Shares, Outstanding Options	4,622
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding Options	$ 32.50	$ 45.19
Shares, Options Exercisable	1,851
$1.26 - $1.26 [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Shares, Outstanding Options	12
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years), Outstanding Options	0.1
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding Options	$ 1.26
Shares, Options Exercisable	12
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options Exercisable	$ 1.26
$2.08 - $6.28 [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Shares, Outstanding Options	98
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years), Outstanding Options	1.6
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding Options	$ 2.08
Shares, Options Exercisable	98
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options Exercisable	$ 2.08
$6.29 - $19.21 [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Shares, Outstanding Options	238
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years), Outstanding Options	2.5
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding Options	$ 15.43
Shares, Options Exercisable	238
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options Exercisable	$ 15.43
$19.22 - 28.12 [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Shares, Outstanding Options	159
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years), Outstanding Options	7.2
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding Options	$ 25.85
Shares, Options Exercisable	59
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options Exercisable	$ 22.45
$28.13 - $38.20 [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Shares, Outstanding Options	3,368
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years), Outstanding Options	8.0
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding Options	$ 31.89
Shares, Options Exercisable	1,092
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options Exercisable	$ 31.48
$38.21 - $48.14 [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Shares, Outstanding Options	481
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years), Outstanding Options	8.7
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding Options	$ 42.90
Shares, Options Exercisable	120
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options Exercisable	$ 42.31
$48.15 - $51.18 [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Shares, Outstanding Options	117
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years), Outstanding Options	5.5
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding Options	$ 48.22
Shares, Options Exercisable	115
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options Exercisable	$ 48.19
$51.19 And Above [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Shares, Outstanding Options	149
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years), Outstanding Options	7.8
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding Options	$ 57.36
Shares, Options Exercisable	117
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Options Exercisable	$ 56.31

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Operating activities:
Net income including controlling interest	$ 265,134	$ 310,582	$ 282,827
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	43,876	43,994	34,937
Stock-based compensation expense	47,581	43,665	28,815
Amortization of premium on investments	17,140	17,088	9,118
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock	(852)	(6,593)	(24,639)
Provision for doubtful accounts	(379)	772	365
Losses / (gains) on Put Rights	0	0	7,601
Losses / (gains) on auction rate certificates	0	0	(7,601)
Deferred taxes	1,208	6,784	(16,031)
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets	275	226	12,986
Payment on litigation settlement	0	(3,000)	(3,000)
Other non-cash items affecting net income	95	532	347
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	18,831	(8,514)	(31,329)
Inventories	3,051	2,105	(15,696)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(4,108)	(10,305)	15,009
Accounts payable and other liabilities	(6,641)	(16,952)	31,556
Income taxes, net	3,866	708	27,995
Deferred revenue	(498)	19,800	(25,725)
Other non-current liabilities	1,218	2,796	(237)
Net cash provided by operating activities	389,797	403,688	327,298
Investing activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities	(611,211)	(619,238)	(646,052)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities	358,142	225,977	504,438
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities	236,535	203,704	139,005
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(167,349)	(47,362)	(37,482)
Purchases of intangible assets	(350)	0	(825)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(12,521)	(3,350)	(5,601)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale	2,075	3,567	2,160
Net cash used in investing activities	(194,679)	(236,702)	(44,357)
Financing activities:
Payments on debt	(518)	0	(7,680)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of shares withheld for taxes	17,386	27,918	42,398
Repurchase of common stock	(268,203)	(192,410)	(241,362)
Excess tax benefit from the exercise of stock options	852	6,593	24,639
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted stock	(3,835)	(4,599)	(2,769)
Net cash used in financing activities	(254,318)	(162,498)	(184,774)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	288	1,163	(3,984)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(58,912)	5,651	94,183
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	551,512	545,861	451,678
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	492,600	551,512	545,861
Supplemental disclosure:
Cash paid for income taxes	98,497	122,531	141,800
Cash paid for interest	133	375	671
Non-cash investing activities:
Purchase consideration payable for acquisition	$ 6,038	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 956	$ 2,466
Class A Common Stock [Member]
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock voting right per share	1	1
Common stock, shares authorized	500,000,000	500,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	46,496,635	51,860,546
Common stock, shares outstanding	46,496,635	51,860,546
Class B Common Stock [Member]
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock voting right per share	10	10
Common stock, shares authorized	500,000,000	500,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	56,598,829	57,559,554
Common stock, shares outstanding	56,598,829	57,559,554

XML

Commitments And Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments And Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

The following table presents a summary of our contractual obligations and commitments as of September 28, 2012:

	Payments Due By Period
	Fiscal 2013		Fiscal 2014		Fiscal 2015		Fiscal 2016		Fiscal 2017		Thereafter		Total
	(in thousands)
Naming rights (1)	$	—	$	7,341	$	7,432	$	7,525	$	7,619	$	126,414	$	156,331
Operating leases (2)	13,751		10,860		7,840		5,897		4,111		5,981		48,440
Purchase obligations (3)	3,832		607		105		—		—		—		4,544
Total	$	17,583	$	18,808	$	15,377	$	13,422	$	11,730	$	132,395	$	209,315

(1) In April 2012, we entered into an agreement for naming rights and related benefits with respect to the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, California, the location of the Academy Awards®. In exchange for these rights and other benefits, we made one annual payment in fiscal 2012 and will subsequently make semi-annual payments over the term. Our payment obligations are conditioned in part on the Academy Awards® being held and broadcast from the Dolby Theatre. The term of the agreement is 20 years.

(2) Operating lease payments include future minimum rental commitments, including those payable to our principal stockholder and portions attributable to the controlling interests in our wholly owned subsidiaries, for non-cancelable operating leases of office space.

(3) Our purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services, entered into in the ordinary course of business. These represent non-cancelable commitments for which a penalty would be imposed if the agreement was canceled for any reason other than an event of default as described by the agreement.

Rental expenses under operating leases were $13.5 million, $12.6 million, and $8.7 million for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. These amounts include expenses for rent payable to our principal stockholder of $1.4 million, $1.4 million, and $1.4 million for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

We are party to certain contractual agreements under which we have agreed to provide indemnifications of varying scope and duration to the other party relating to our licensed intellectual property. Historically, we have made no payments for these indemnification obligations and no amounts have been accrued in our consolidated financial statements with respect to these obligations. Due to their varying terms and conditions, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount we could be required to pay.

XML

Document And Entity Information (USD $) In Billions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Mar. 30, 2012	Nov. 02, 2012 Class A Common Stock [Member]	Nov. 02, 2012 Class B Common Stock [Member]
Entity Registrant Name	Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001308547
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--09-28
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Document Type	10-K
Document Period End Date	Sep. 28, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding			45,837,295	56,598,329
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Public Float		$ 1.7

XML

Geographic Data

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Segments, Geographical Areas [Abstract]

Geographic Data

Geographic Data

Operating Segments

We operate as a single reportable segment on an enterprise-wide basis. We generate revenue by licensing our technologies to manufacturers of CE products and software vendors and by selling our professional products and related services to entertainment content creators, producers, and distributors.

Geographic Information

Revenue by geographic region, which was determined based on the location of our licensees for licensing revenue, the location of our direct customers or distributors for products revenue, and the location where we perform our services for services revenue, was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
U.S.	$	298,592	$	301,868	$	318,127
International	627,672		653,637		604,586
Total revenue	$	926,264	$	955,505	$	922,713

The concentration of our revenue from individual geographic regions was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
U.S.	33	%	32	%	34	%
Japan	18	%	20	%	19	%
Europe	15	%	15	%	16	%
Taiwan	7	%	8	%	9	%
South Korea	17	%	13	%	12	%
China	6	%	6	%	5	%
Other	4	%	6	%	5	%

Long-lived tangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation, by geographic region were as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
U.S.	$	211,647	$	87,486
International	43,029		29,621
Total long-lived tangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation	$	254,676	$	117,107

XML

Geographic Data (Revenue By Geographic Region) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Jun. 29, 2012	Mar. 30, 2012	Dec. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jul. 01, 2011	Apr. 01, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Segment Reporting, Revenue Reconciling Item [Line Items]
Total revenue	$ 224,755	$ 207,872	$ 260,259	$ 233,378	$ 243,768	$ 218,999	$ 250,026	$ 242,712	$ 926,264	$ 955,505	$ 922,713
U.S. [Member]
Segment Reporting, Revenue Reconciling Item [Line Items]
Total revenue									298,592	301,868	318,127
International [Member]
Segment Reporting, Revenue Reconciling Item [Line Items]
Total revenue									$ 627,672	$ 653,637	$ 604,586

XML

Per Share Data (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Jun. 29, 2012	Mar. 30, 2012	Dec. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jul. 01, 2011	Apr. 01, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Schedule Of Earnings Per Share Basic And Diluted [Line Items]
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$ 51,494	$ 51,529	$ 88,120	$ 73,159	$ 79,071	$ 61,748	$ 82,061	$ 86,387	$ 264,302	$ 309,267	$ 283,447
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic	104,079	106,328	108,415	108,884	110,063	111,494	112,140	112,035	106,926	111,444	113,452
Potential common shares from options to purchase Class A and Class B common stock									493	941	1,769
Potential common shares from restricted stock units									122	169	167
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted	104,915	107,202	109,170	109,443	110,662	112,349	113,346	113,713	107,541	112,554	115,388
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. - Basic	$ 0.49	$ 0.48	$ 0.81	$ 0.67	$ 0.72	$ 0.55	$ 0.73	$ 0.77	$ 2.47	$ 2.78	$ 2.50
Net income per share attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc. - Diluted	$ 0.49	$ 0.48	$ 0.81	$ 0.67	$ 0.71	$ 0.55	$ 0.72	$ 0.76	$ 2.46	$ 2.75	$ 2.46
Stock Options [Member]
Schedule Of Earnings Per Share Basic And Diluted [Line Items]
Anti-dilutive securities, excluded from calculations									6,496	3,289	2,074
Restricted Stock Units [Member]
Schedule Of Earnings Per Share Basic And Diluted [Line Items]
Anti-dilutive securities, excluded from calculations									2,550	535	457

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Operations (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Revenue:
Licensing	$ 794,563	$ 790,340	$ 710,474
Products	103,388	131,611	180,402
Services	28,313	33,554	31,837
Total revenue	926,264	955,505	922,713
Cost of revenue:
Cost of licensing	12,924	17,620	17,565
Cost of products	66,325	81,328	90,695
Cost of services	12,778	12,223	13,961
Impairment of products provided under operating leases	0	0	9,594
Total cost of revenue	92,027	111,171	131,815
Gross margin	834,237	844,334	790,898
Operating expenses:
Research and development	140,143	123,920	104,978
Sales and marketing	181,736	149,642	130,160
General and administrative	149,175	137,633	119,353
Restructuring charges, net	1,191	3,406	7,026
Total operating expenses	472,245	414,601	361,517
Operating income	361,992	429,733	429,381
Interest income	6,411	8,976	7,298
Interest expense	(196)	1,027	(703)
Other income, net	784	907	1,036
Income before provision for income taxes	368,991	440,643	437,012
Provision for income taxes	(103,857)	(130,061)	(154,185)
Net income including controlling interest	265,134	310,582	282,827
Less: net (income) / loss attributable to controlling interest	(832)	(1,315)	620
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	264,302	309,267	283,447
Net income per share:
Basic	$ 2.47	$ 2.78	$ 2.50
Diluted	$ 2.46	$ 2.75	$ 2.46
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic	106,926	111,444	113,452
Diluted	107,541	112,554	115,388
Related party rent expense included in general and administrative expenses	1,372	1,372	1,372
Related party rent expense included in net income attributable to controlling interest	$ 3,270	$ 3,098	$ 3,225

XML

Fair Value Measurements

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We minimize the use of unobservable inputs and use observable market data, if available, when determining fair value. We classify our inputs to measure fair value using the following three-level hierarchy:

Level 1:    Quoted prices in active markets at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2:    Prices may be based upon quoted prices in active markets or inputs not quoted on active markets but are corroborated by market data.

Level 3:    Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available and reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of September 28, 2012 are classified below:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	2,140	$	—	$	—	$	2,140
Money market funds (2)	17,090		—		—		17,090
Commercial paper (2), (3)	—		24,299		—		24,299
Corporate bonds (3)	—		220,236		—		220,236
Municipal debt securities (2), (3)	—		401,648		—		401,648
U.S. agency securities (3)	25,012		—		—		25,012
Total	$	44,242	$	646,183	$	—	$	690,425

(1) These assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets and within other non-current assets.

(2) These assets are included within cash and cash equivalents.

(3) These assets are included within short-term investments and within long-term investments.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	2,140	$	—	$	—	$	2,140
Total	$	2,140	$	—	$	—	$	2,140

(1) These liabilities are included within accrued liabilities and within other non-current liabilities.

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of September 30, 2011 are classified below:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891
Money market funds (2)	142,038		—		—		142,038
Corporate bonds (3)	—		176,958		—		176,958
Municipal debt securities (3)	—		472,201		—		472,201
U.S. agency securities (2), (3)	29,919		—		—		29,919
Total	$	173,848	$	649,159	$	—	$	823,007

(1) These assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets and within other non-current assets.

(2) These assets are included within cash and cash equivalents.

(3) These assets are included within short-term investments and within long-term investments.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in thousands)
Liabilities:
Investments held in supplemental retirement plan (1)	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891
Total	$	1,891	$	—	$	—	$	1,891

(1) These liabilities are included within accrued liabilities and within other non-current liabilities.

We base the fair value of our Level 1 financial instruments, which are traded in active markets, using quoted market prices for identical instruments. Our Level 1 financial instruments include money market funds, U.S. agency securities, U.S. government bonds, and mutual fund investments held in our supplemental retirement plan.

We obtain the fair value of our Level 2 financial instruments from a professional pricing service, which may use quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments, or model driven valuations using observable market data or inputs corroborated by observable market data.

To validate the fair value determination provided by our primary pricing service, we perform quality controls over values received which include comparing our pricing service provider’s assessment of the fair values of our investment securities against the fair values of our investment securities obtained from another independent source, reviewing the pricing movement in the context of overall market trends, and reviewing trading information from our investment managers. In addition, we assess the inputs and methods used in determining the fair value in order to determine the classification of securities in the fair value hierarchy.

We did not own any Level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of September 28, 2012 or September 30, 2011.

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against assets and liabilities for which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure, in an effort to reduce the risk that our earnings will be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. These derivative instruments are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded to other income, net in our consolidated statements of operations. Our foreign currency forward contracts, which are not designated as hedging instruments, are used to reduce the exchange rate risk associated primarily with intercompany receivables and payables. These contracts do not subject us to material balance sheet risk due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these derivatives are intended to offset gains and losses on the related receivables and payables for which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure. As of September 28, 2012, the outstanding derivative instruments had maturities of 30 days or less and notional amounts of approximately $5.0 million. The fair values of these contracts were not material as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, and were included in accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

XML

Acquisitions

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Acquisitions

Acquisitions

On July 19, 2012, we acquired all outstanding shares of IMM Sound, S.A. (“IMM Sound”), a privately held company based in Barcelona, Spain, that develops and markets immersive 3D sound for the digital film industry. We believe that this technology complements our newly released Atmos technology. We accounted for the IMM Sound acquisition using the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. We completed the acquisition for a gross purchase price of $26.5 million, which included cash payments of $18.4 million, debt repayment of $0.6 million, and the assumption of net liabilities of $7.5 million. Purchase consideration, net of cash acquired of $0.4 million, was $18.0 million. Pursuant to the merger agreement, $6.0 million of the total purchase consideration is being held back by us for a period of twenty four months following the closing of the acquisition to satisfy certain indemnification obligations of IMM Sound's shareholders. This amount has been recorded as a non-current liability as of September 28, 2012.

The following table summarizes the allocation of total consideration to the total fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

	Total
	(in thousands)
Current assets	$	1,289
Property, plant and equipment, net	264
Intangible assets, net
Developed technology	12,649
Trade name	590
Goodwill	15,988
Current liabilities	(9,674		)
Deferred taxes, net	(2,721		)
Non-current liabilities	(22		)
Total purchase price	$	18,363

Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were determined by management based on information available at the date of acquisition. We are amortizing the acquired intangible assets over their estimated useful lives, which is five years for the developed technology and one year for the trade name. For tax purposes, a deferred tax liability of $3.2 million was recorded on the acquisition date for the difference between book and tax basis related to the acquired intangible assets. The value of acquired intangibles was determined based on the present value of estimated expected future cash flows. Goodwill resulted primarily from our expectation of synergies from the integration of IMM Sound technology with our existing technology and is not tax deductible. We incurred acquisition-related transaction costs of $0.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2012, which were included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

XML

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Quarterly Financial Data [Abstract]

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

	Fiscal Quarter Ended
	September 28, 2012		June 29, 2012		March 30, 2012		December 30, 2011		September 30, 2011		July 1, 2011		April 1, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
Licensing	$	191,154	$	178,436	$	225,349	$	199,624	$	205,747	$	181,790	$	214,627	$	188,176
Products	27,628		22,132		27,228		26,400		30,842		28,395		26,347		46,027
Services	5,973		7,304		7,682		7,354		7,179		8,814		9,052		8,509
Total revenue	224,755		207,872		260,259		233,378		243,768		218,999		250,026		242,712
Cost of revenue	26,994		21,031		23,592		20,410		25,642		27,933		28,457		29,139
Gross margin	197,761		186,841		236,667		212,968		218,126		191,066		221,569		213,573
Income before taxes and controlling interest	72,951		70,321		122,515		103,204		116,632		90,451		122,494		111,066
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	51,494	$	51,529	$	88,120	$	73,159	$	79,071	$	61,748	$	82,061	$	86,387
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.49	$	0.48	$	0.81	$	0.67	$	0.72	$	0.55	$	0.73	$	0.77
Diluted	$	0.49	$	0.48	$	0.81	$	0.67	$	0.71	$	0.55	$	0.72	$	0.76
Shares outstanding:
Basic	104,079		106,328		108,415		108,884		110,063		111,494		112,140		112,035
Diluted	104,915		107,202		109,170		109,443		110,662		112,349		113,346		113,713

XML

Common Stock Repurchase Program

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Disclosure of Repurchase Agreements [Abstract]

Common Stock Repurchase Program

Common Stock Repurchase Program

In November 2009, we announced a stock repurchase program, providing for the repurchase of up to $250.0 million of our Class A common stock. Our Board of Directors approved an additional $300.0 million for our stock repurchase program in July 2010, $250.0 million in July 2011, and an additional $100.0 million in February 2012, for a total authorization of up to $900.0 million in stock repurchases. Stock repurchases under this program may be made through open market transactions, negotiated purchases, or otherwise, at times and in amounts that we consider appropriate. The timing of repurchases and the number of shares repurchased depend upon a variety of factors, including price, regulatory requirements, the rate of dilution from our equity compensation programs, and other market conditions. We may limit, suspend, or terminate the stock repurchase program at any time without prior notice. This program does not have a specified expiration date. Shares repurchased under the program will be returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Class A common stock. As of September 28, 2012, the remaining authorization to purchase additional shares is $198.3 million.

Stock repurchase activity under the stock repurchase program during fiscal 2012 is summarized as follows:

	Shares Repurchased	Cost (in thousands) (1)		Average Price Paid per Share (2)
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended December 30, 2011	885,969	$	26,068	$	29.41
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2012	1,575,891	$	60,081	$	38.11
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended June 29, 2012	2,545,699	$	103,810	$	40.76
Repurchase activity for the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2012	2,205,433	$	78,244	$	35.46
Total	7,212,992	$	268,203

(1) Cost of share repurchases includes the price paid per share and applicable commissions.

(2) Excludes commission costs.

XML

Common Stock Repurchase Program (Schedule Of Stock Repurchased Under Stock Repurchased Program) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012		Jun. 29, 2012		Mar. 30, 2012		Dec. 30, 2011		Sep. 28, 2012
Disclosure of Repurchase Agreements [Abstract]
Shares Repurchased	2,205,433		2,545,699		1,575,891		885,969		7,212,992
Cost	$ 78,244	[1]	$ 103,810	[1]	$ 60,081	[1]	$ 26,068	[1]	$ 268,203	[1]
Average Price Paid per Share	$ 35.46	[2]	$ 40.76	[2]	$ 38.11	[2]	$ 29.41	[2]	$ 35.46	[2]

[1] Cost of share repurchases includes the price paid per share and applicable commissions.

[2] Excludes commission costs.

XML

Income Taxes

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

The components of our income before provision for income taxes are as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
U.S.	$	258,684	$	350,189	$	401,936
Foreign	110,307		90,454		35,076
Total	$	368,991	$	440,643	$	437,012

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Current:
Federal	$	56,105		$	71,336		$	109,050
State	2,922			18,069			18,382
Foreign	43,659			33,567			41,942
Total current	102,686			122,972			169,374
Deferred:
Federal	904			3,638			(12,790		)
State	521			9,756			(1,149		)
Foreign	(254		)	(6,305		)	(1,250		)
Total deferred	1,171			7,089			(15,189		)
Provision for income taxes	$	103,857		$	130,061		$	154,185

We recognize licensing revenue gross of withholding taxes, which our licensees remit directly to their local tax authorities, and for which we receive a related foreign tax credit in our income tax provision. Withholding taxes were $38.5 million, $32.2 million, and $31.6 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The foreign current tax includes this withholding tax expense and the appropriate foreign tax credit benefit is included in the current federal and foreign taxes.

In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, we initiated a policy to indefinitely reinvest a portion of the earnings of certain operations outside of the U.S. As a result, we have not provided deferred U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on undistributed earnings of approximately $162.2 million, which are permanently reinvested outside the U.S. Upon distribution of these earnings, we could be subject to both U.S. income taxes, adjusted for any foreign tax credits, and withholding taxes, estimated at approximately $48.3 million as of September 28, 2012.

In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, we also completed a restructuring of our international operations, which resulted in the release of a deferred tax liability of $11.0 million related to the amortization of an intangible asset from a prior year acquisition.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A summary of the tax effects of the temporary differences is as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Deferred income tax assets:
Investments	$	2,096		$	1,932
Accounts receivable	182			417
Inventories	3,678			3,304
Net operating loss	2,863			2,987
U.S. state taxes	177			5,749
Accrued expenses	10,140			9,216
Stock-based compensation	25,720			19,547
Revenue recognition	63,843			67,154
Foreign tax credits	3,410			3,528
Other	7,338			6,040
Total gross deferred income tax assets	119,447			119,874
Less: valuation allowance	—			—
Total deferred income tax assets	119,447			119,874
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Translation adjustment	(904		)	(837		)
Intangibles	(3,746		)	(595		)
International earnings	(6,373		)	(1,485		)
Depreciation and amortization	(6,761		)	(11,422		)
Unrealized gain on investments	(768		)	(558		)
Deferred income tax assets, net	$	100,895		$	104,977
The above deferred income tax assets, net have been classified in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Current deferred income tax assets	$	80,956		$	90,869
Long-term deferred income tax assets, net	19,939			14,108
Deferred income tax assets, net	$	100,895		$	104,977

Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, we believe it is more likely than not that the benefits of these deductible differences will be realized; therefore, a valuation allowance is not required.

As part of our current acquisition in July 2012, we acquired a net operating loss carryover for Spain tax purposes of $1.7 million and will expire in fiscal 2030 if unused. As part of an acquisition in April 2009, we acquired net operating loss carryovers for federal and California tax purposes of $9.7 million and $9.6 million, respectively. The losses carried forward for federal and California tax purposes as of September 28, 2012 were $6.4 million and $9.6 million, respectively, and will expire in fiscal 2029 if unused. As of September 28, 2012, we had net operating loss carryovers for Australia tax purposes of $0.1 million which have no expiration date.

A reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to our effective tax rate for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 is as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
Federal statutory rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
State income taxes, net of federal effect	1.1		4.7		3.2
Stock-based compensation expense rate	0.5		0.3		(0.1	)
Research and development tax credits	(1.1	)	(1.6	)	(0.8	)
Tax exempt interest	(0.3	)	(0.3	)	(0.4	)
U.S. manufacturing tax incentives	(2.1	)	(1.9	)	(1.8	)
Foreign rate differential	(5.3	)	(4.6	)	(0.1	)
Foreign reversal of deferred tax liabilities	—		(2.5	)	—
Other	0.3		0.4		0.2
Effective tax rate	28.1	%	29.5	%	35.2	%

Our policy to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our undistributed earnings in certain foreign subsidiaries with tax rates lower than those in the U.S. resulted in a reduction to our fiscal 2012 tax rate. We also benefited from a change in the State of California apportionment sourcing rules, which began to affect our current California taxes beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. These benefits were partially offset by the expiration of the federal research and development tax credits, beginning January 1, 2012, which resulted in an increase in our effective tax rate. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011 we obtained a tax ruling that will reduce our foreign tax liability for the current and future years. The tax ruling resulted in a release of certain deferred tax liabilities associated with a prior year acquisition in our foreign operations. In fiscal 2011 we expected a reduction in our California tax rate. As a result, in fiscal 2011 we reduced certain deferred tax assets, which increased our tax rate. Additionally, in the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, a change in the tax law retroactively reinstated the federal research and development tax credits for a portion of fiscal 2010. As a result, we recognized an increase in federal research and development tax credits for fiscal 2011, as compared to fiscal 2010, thereby further lowering our effective tax rate.

As of September 28, 2012, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $16.9 million, of which $10.9 million, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate. Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits is classified within other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

The aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were as follows:

	(in thousands)
Balance at September 25, 2009	$	16,916
Lapse of statute of limitations	(2,143		)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	—
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	520
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	1,265
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	16,558
Lapse of statute of limitations	(1,097		)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	(8,083		)
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	1,006
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	299
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	8,683
Lapse of statute of limitations	(1,236		)
Decreases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	(493		)
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during prior years	3,156
Increases in balances related to tax positions taken during the current year	6,770
Balance at September 28, 2012	$	16,880

To the extent accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued will be reduced in the period that such determination is made and are reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision. At September 28, 2012, we had $2.0 million of accrued interest and $1.9 million of accrued penalties on unrecognized tax benefits. At September 30, 2011, we had $2.0 million of accrued interest and $2.4 million of accrued penalties on unrecognized tax benefits. In fiscal 2012, our current tax provision was reduced by penalties of $0.5 million and increased by interest expense of $0.1 million.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. on a federal basis and in several U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. Our most significant tax jurisdictions are the U.S., the United Kingdom (U.K.), the Netherlands, and the state of California. Our tax filings remain subject to examination by applicable tax authorities for a certain length of time following the tax year to which those filings relate. We are no longer subject to examinations by the Internal Revenue Service through the 2006 tax year, for U.S. federal tax purposes, and through the 2006 fiscal year by the appropriate governmental agencies for U.K. tax purposes. In addition, we are no longer subject to examination by the state of New York through the 2008 tax year for income tax purposes. Our California filings are no longer subject to examination through the 2004 tax year by the appropriate California agency. Other significant jurisdictions include Australia, Canada, and Sweden and they are no longer subject to examinations through the years 2003, 2006, and 2007, respectively. We do not believe that the outcome of any ongoing examination will have a material impact on our financial statements.

We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing income tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expected tolling of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions. Considering these facts, we do not currently believe there is a reasonable possibility of any significant change to our total unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Schedule Of Financial Assets Carried At Fair Value) (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 28, 2012		Sep. 30, 2011
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	$ 690,425,000		$ 823,007,000
Notional amount of derivative	5,000,000
Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	44,242,000		173,848,000
Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	646,183,000		649,159,000
Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0		0
Money Market Funds [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	17,090,000	[1]	142,038,000	[1]
Money Market Funds [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	17,090,000	[1]	142,038,000	[1]
Money Market Funds [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[1]	0	[1]
Money Market Funds [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[1]	0	[1]
Investments Held In Supplemental Retirement Plan [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	2,140,000	[2]	1,891,000	[2]
Investments Held In Supplemental Retirement Plan [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	2,140,000	[2]	1,891,000	[2]
Investments Held In Supplemental Retirement Plan [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[2]	0	[2]
Investments Held In Supplemental Retirement Plan [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[2]	0	[2]
Corporate Bonds [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	220,236,000	[3]	176,958,000	[3]
Corporate Bonds [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[3]	0	[3]
Corporate Bonds [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	220,236,000	[3]	176,958,000	[3]
Corporate Bonds [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[3]	0	[3]
Commercial Paper [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	24,299,000	[1],[3]
Commercial Paper [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[1],[3]
Commercial Paper [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	24,299,000	[1],[3]
Commercial Paper [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[1],[3]
Municipal Debt Securities [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	401,648,000	[1],[3]	472,201,000	[3]
Municipal Debt Securities [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[1],[3]	0	[3]
Municipal Debt Securities [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	401,648,000	[1],[3]	472,201,000	[3]
Municipal Debt Securities [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[1],[3]	0	[3]
U.S. Agency Securities [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	25,012,000	[3]	29,919,000	[1],[3]
U.S. Agency Securities [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	25,012,000	[3]	29,919,000	[1],[3]
U.S. Agency Securities [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	0	[3]	0	[1],[3]
U.S. Agency Securities [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets carried at fair value	$ 0	[3]	$ 0	[1],[3]

[1] These assets are included within cash and cash equivalents.

[2] These assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets and within other non-current assets.

[3] These assets are included within short-term investments and within long-term investments.

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation

Stockholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation

Class A and Class B Common Stock

Our Board of Directors has authorized two classes of common stock, Class A and Class B. At September 28, 2012, we had authorized 500,000,000 Class A shares and 500,000,000 Class B shares. At September 28, 2012, we had 46,496,635 shares of Class A common stock and 56,598,829 shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding. Holders of our Class A and Class B common stock have identical rights, except that holders of our Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share. Shares of Class B common stock can be converted to shares of Class A common stock at any time at the option of the stockholder and automatically convert upon sale or transfer, except for certain transfers specified in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

Stock Incentive Plans

2000 Stock Incentive Plan.    Effective October 2000, we adopted the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, provides for the issuance of incentive and non-qualified stock options to employees, directors, and consultants of Dolby Laboratories to purchase up to 15.1 million shares of Class B common stock. Under the terms of this plan, options became exercisable as established by the Board of Directors (ratably over four years), and expire ten years after the date of the grant. Options granted under the plan were granted at not less than fair market value at the date of grant.

As of September 28, 2012, there were options outstanding to purchase 0.2 million shares of Class B common stock, of which all were vested and exercisable. The options outstanding have a remaining weighted-average contractual life of 1.7 years. Subsequent to fiscal 2005, no further options were granted under this plan. The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan terminated on October 1, 2010 and no shares of our common stock remained available for future issuance under that plan other than pursuant to outstanding options.

2005 Stock Plan.    In January 2005, our stockholders approved our 2005 Stock Plan, which our Board of Directors adopted in November 2004. The 2005 Stock Plan became effective on February 16, 2005, the day prior to the completion of our initial public offering. Our 2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated, provides for the ability to grant incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock units, performance units, performance bonus awards, and performance shares. A total of 21.0 million shares of our Class A common stock is authorized for issuance under the 2005 Stock Plan. For any awards granted prior to February 2011, any shares subject to an award with a per share price less than the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant and any shares subject to an outstanding restricted stock unit award will be counted against the authorized share reserve as two shares for every one share subject to the award, and if returned to the 2005 Stock Plan, such shares will be counted as two shares for every one share returned. For those awards granted from February 2011 onward, any shares subject to an award with a per share price less than the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant and any shares subject to an outstanding restricted stock unit award will be counted against the authorized share reserve as 1.6 shares for every one share subject to the award, and if returned to the 2005 Stock Plan, such shares will be counted as 1.6 shares for every one share returned.

As of September 28, 2012, there were options outstanding to purchase 4.4 million shares of Class A common stock, of which 1.7 million were vested and exercisable. The options outstanding have a remaining weighted-average contractual life of 7.8 years.

Stock-Based Compensation

We provide stock-based awards as a form of compensation for employees, officers, and directors. We have issued stock-based awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights under our equity incentive plans, as well as shares under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).

Stock-based compensation expense recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012 (2)			September 30, 2011 (2)			September 24, 2010 (2)
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation:
Stock options (1)	$	23,550		$	24,788		$	18,135
Restricted stock units	22,952			18,339			9,560
Employee stock purchase plan	1,029			842			673
Stock appreciation rights	50			(304		)	447
Total stock-based compensation	47,581			43,665			28,815
Benefit from income taxes	(14,930		)	(14,744		)	(9,805		)
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax	$	32,651		$	28,921		$	19,010

(1) Expense excludes $0.4 million in fiscal 2012, $0.6 million in fiscal 2011, and $0.8 million in fiscal 2010 related to stock-based compensation which was capitalized to property, plant and equipment.

(2) We also recognized $0.2 million, $0.3 million, and $1.2 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, of tax benefit from certain exercises of incentive stock options and shares issued under our ESPP, which is not included in the table above.

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Stock-based compensation expense was classified as follows:
Cost of products	$	675	$	642	$	427
Cost of services	239		182		126
Research and development	11,553		10,157		6,535
Sales and marketing	16,233		13,184		8,843
General and administrative	18,881		19,500		12,884
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	47,581	$	43,665	$	28,815

Stock Options.    We have granted stock options to our employees, officers, and directors under our 2005 Stock Plan and our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. Stock options are generally granted at fair market value on the date of grant. Options granted to employees and officers prior to June 2008 generally vest over four years, with equal annual cliff-vesting and expire on the earlier of 10 years after the date of grant or 3 months after termination of service. Options granted to employees and officers from June 2008 onward generally vest over four years, with 25% of the shares subject to the option becoming exercisable on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the balance of the shares vesting in equal monthly installments over the following 36 months. These options expire on the earlier of 10 years after the date of grant or 3 months after termination of service. All options granted vest over the requisite service period and upon the exercise of stock options, we issue new shares of Class B common stock under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and new shares of Class A common stock under the 2005 Stock Plan. Our 2005 Stock Plan also allows us to grant stock awards which vest based on the satisfaction of specific performance criteria.

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of employee stock options at the date of grant. The fair value of our stock options was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
Expected term (in years)	4.53		4.40		4.66
Risk-free interest rate	0.7	%	1.5	%	2.2	%
Expected stock price volatility	43.8	%	41.4	%	41.7	%
Dividend yield	—		—		—

To determine an estimate for the expected term of our stock options, we evaluated historical exercise patterns of our employees and made an assumption regarding future exercise patterns. To determine an estimate for the expected stock price volatility, we used a blend of the historical volatility for our common stock since our initial public offering and our implied volatility. To determine an estimate for the risk-free interest rate we used an average interest rate based on U.S. Treasury instruments having terms consistent with the expected term of our awards.

The following table summarizes the weighted-average fair value of stock options granted and the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
Weighted-average fair value at date of grant	$	12.23	$	22.31	$	19.93
Intrinsic value of options exercised (in thousands)	6,188		46,649		79,453

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options is recognized net of estimated forfeitures. We determine our estimated forfeiture rate based on an evaluation of historical forfeitures. For awards granted in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, we used an estimated forfeiture rate of 6.13%, 6.10%, and 5.69%, respectively. Total unrecorded stock-based compensation cost at September 28, 2012 associated with employee stock options expected to vest was $54.1 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.

The following table summarizes information about stock options issued to officers, directors, and employees under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2005 Stock Plan:

	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)				(in years)	(in thousands)
Options outstanding at September 30, 2011	5,801		$	45.19
Grants	2,603		32.99
Exercises	(456	)	26.52
Forfeitures and cancellations	(3,326	)	55.83
Options outstanding at September 28, 2012	4,622		32.50		7.5	$	12,752
Options vested and expected to vest at September 28, 2012	4,437		32.43		7.5	12,577
Options exercisable at September 28, 2012	1,851		30.68		5.1	9,936

Aggregate intrinsic value is based on the closing price of our common stock on September 28, 2012 of $32.75 and excludes the impact of options that were not in-the-money.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 28, 2012:

	Outstanding Options				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Shares	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price
	(in thousands)	(in years)			(in thousands)
$1.26 - $1.26	12	0.1	$	1.26	12	$	1.26
$2.08 - $6.28	98	1.6	2.08		98	2.08
$6.29 - $19.21	238	2.5	15.43		238	15.43
$19.22 - 28.12	159	7.2	25.85		59	22.45
$28.13 - $38.20	3,368	8.0	31.89		1,092	31.48
$38.21 - $48.14	481	8.7	42.90		120	42.31
$48.15 - $51.18	117	5.5	48.22		115	48.19
$51.19 and above	149	7.8	57.36		117	56.31
	4,622				1,851

Restricted Stock Units.    We grant restricted stock units to certain employees, officers, and directors under our 2005 Stock Plan. Awards granted to employees and officers generally vest over four years, with equal annual cliff-vesting. Awards granted to directors prior to November 2010 generally vest over three years, with equal annual cliff-vesting. Awards granted after November 2010 to new directors vest over approximately two years, with 50% vesting per year, while awards granted from November 2010 onwards to ongoing directors vest over approximately one year. Our 2005 Stock Plan also allows us to grant restricted stock units which vest based on the satisfaction of specific performance criteria, although no such awards have been granted as of September 28, 2012. At each vesting date, the holder of the award is issued shares of our Class A common stock. Compensation expense from these awards is equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and is recognized over the requisite service period. No restricted stock units were granted prior to fiscal 2008. Total unrecorded stock-based compensation cost at September 28, 2012 associated with restricted stock units expected to vest was $57.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years. The fair value as of the respective vesting dates of restricted stock units was $14.2 million, $15.5 million and $10.3 million for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The following table summarizes information about restricted stock units issued to officers, directors, and employees under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan:

	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Non-vested at September 30, 2011	946		$	53.71
Granted	2,157		33.91
Vested	(387	)	50.78
Forfeitures	(144	)	45.90
Non-vested at September 28, 2012	2,572		37.98

Stock Appreciation Rights.    We have granted stock appreciation rights to certain of our foreign employees. These awards are settled in cash rather than stock, and are classified as liability awards.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan.   Prior to May 2012, our ESPP allowed eligible employees to have up to 10 percent of their eligible compensation withheld and used to purchase Class A common stock, subject to a maximum of $25,000 worth of stock purchased in a calendar year or no more than 1,000 shares in an offering period, whichever is less. The plan provided for a discount equal to 15 percent of the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the last day of the purchase period.

As of May 15, 2012, the compensation committee of our Board of Directors amended the ESPP to provide for overlapping one-year offering periods composed of successive six-month purchase periods, with a look back feature to the Company's stock price at the commencement of a one-year offering period. The amended plan also includes an automatic reset feature that provides for an offering period to be reset and recommenced to a new lower-priced offering if the offering price of a new offering period is less than that of the immediately preceding offering period. The amended plan continues to allow eligible employees to have up to 10 percent of their eligible compensation withheld and used to purchase Class A common stock, subject to a maximum of $25,000 worth of stock purchased in a calendar year or no more than 1,000 shares in an offering period, whichever is less. The amendment is effective for the ESPP offering period which commenced in May 2012. The adoption of the amendment to the ESPP did not have a material impact on our results of operations.

Option Exchange Program

During our Annual Stockholder's Meeting held on February 7, 2012, our stockholders approved a one-time Employee Stock Option Exchange Program (the "Program") pursuant to which eligible employees were provided an opportunity to exchange, on a grant-by-grant basis, eligible outstanding stock options for a lesser number of new restricted stock units (“RSUs”), to be granted under our 2005 Stock Plan, as amended and restated. Options eligible for the Program are those that were granted prior to the 12-month period preceding the start of the Program offering period, and have exercise prices per share that are greater than $45.83, which approximates the 52-week high of our per share stock price as of the start of the offering period. The Program offering period commenced on July 16, 2012 and closed on August 10, 2012, at which time, a total of 705 eligible option holder participants exchanged 2,665,986 outstanding stock options for 783,443 RSUs.

The Program was launched to restore the intended retention and incentive value of employee equity awards, reduce the potential dilutive effect of our equity incentive program, and reduce pressure to grant additional equity awards to employees in the short term. Participation in the Program was made available to all eligible employees and executive officers in eligible countries. The exchange of options under the Program resulted in a total incremental charge to compensation expense of $2.1 million. This incremental charge is being recognized over the vesting periods of the new RSUs, determined on a grant-by-grant basis, based on the extent to which the surrendered stock options were vested at the time of the exchange. These vesting periods range from one to four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant.

XML

Restructuring

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Restructuring Charges [Abstract]

Restructuring

Restructuring

In fiscal 2011, we informed approximately 55 employees of our plans to reorganize certain aspects of our business under a strategic restructuring program. As a result of this action, we offered severance benefits to the affected employees. We recognized total severance and other associated costs of $0.4 million and $2.5 million for these affected employees in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. In addition, we recognized $0.4 million in facilities and contract termination costs in fiscal 2012. We also recognized $0.4 million and $0.2 million in fixed asset write-off costs related to this restructuring program in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. These expenses were recognized in restructuring charges, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In fiscal 2010, we informed approximately 60 general and administrative employees of our plans to reorganize certain aspects of our global business infrastructure. As a result of this action, we offered severance benefits to the affected employees. The majority of these employees were required to render service through November 15, 2010 to receive these severance benefits. We recognized the total severance and other associated costs of approximately $3.9 million for these employees on a ratable basis through termination dates for each employee. These expenses were recognized in restructuring charges, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In fiscal 2010, we also recorded $3.4 million of impairment within the restructuring charges line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to one of our buildings held in the UK. See Note 3 “Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions” for further information.

Changes in our restructuring accruals in fiscal 2012 and 2011, which were included within accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively, were as follows:

	Severance			Facilities and contract termination costs			Fixed assets write-off			Other associated costs			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	2,804		$	—		$	—		$	230		$	3,034
Restructuring charges	3,185			—			199			22			3,406
Cash payments	(3,716		)	—			—			(131		)	(3,847		)
Non-cash charges	(23		)	—			(199		)	(1		)	(223		)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	2,250		$	—		$	—		$	120		$	2,370
Restructuring charges	318			352			424			97			1,191
Cash payments	(2,572		)	(185		)	—			(201		)	(2,958		)
Non-cash charges	4			164			(424		)	(14		)	(270		)
Balance at September 28, 2012	$	—		$	331		$	—		$	2		$	333

XML

Retirement Plans

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Expense [Abstract]

Retirement Plans

Retirement Plans

We maintain a tax-qualified 401(k) retirement plan for employees in the U.S. and similar plans in foreign jurisdictions. Retirement plan expenses were $12.9 million, $11.3 million, and $11.1 million for fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Retirement plan expenses are included in cost of products, cost of services, sales and marketing, general and administrative, and research and development expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation (Schedule of Stock-Based Compensation By Classification) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	$ 47,581	$ 43,665	$ 28,815
Cost of products [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	675	642	427
Cost of services [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	239	182	126
Research and development [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	11,553	10,157	6,535
Sales and marketing [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	16,233	13,184	8,843
General and administrative [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	$ 18,881	$ 19,500	$ 12,884

XML

Legal Proceedings (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	109 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2002	Sep. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Amount agreed to pay on settlement of dispute	$ 30.0
Annual installments			3.0
Present value of contingency liability	24.2
Back royalties recognized as revenue		15.2
Amount received as interest related to back royalties		2.2
Royalties Prior to Fiscal 2011 [Member]
Legal Proceedings [Line Items]
Back royalties recognized as revenue		$ 11.3

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation (Summary Of Weighted-Average Fair Value Of Stock Options Granted And Total Intrinsic Value Of Stock Options Exercised) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]
Weighted-average fair value at date of grant	$ 12.23	$ 22.31	$ 19.93
Intrinsic value of options exercised	$ 6,188	$ 46,649	$ 79,453

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation (Schedule Of Stock-Based Compensation Expense By Plan) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012		Sep. 30, 2011		Sep. 24, 2010
Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Line Items]
Share based compensation expense	$ 47,581		$ 43,665		$ 28,815
Benefit from income taxes	(14,930)		(14,744)		(9,805)
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax	32,651		28,921		19,010
Stock Option [Member]
Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Line Items]
Share based compensation expense	23,550	[1]	24,788	[1]	18,135	[1]
Restricted Stock Units [Member]
Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Line Items]
Share based compensation expense	22,952		18,339		9,560
Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]
Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Line Items]
Share based compensation expense	1,029		842		673
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) [Member]
Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Line Items]
Share based compensation expense	$ 50		$ (304)		$ 447

[1] Expense excludes $0.4 million in fiscal 2012, $0.6 million in fiscal 2011, and $0.8 million in fiscal 2010 related to stock-based compensation which was capitalized to property, plant and equipment.

XML

Geographic Data (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Segments, Geographical Areas [Abstract]

Revenue By Geographic Region

Revenue by geographic region, which was determined based on the location of our licensees for licensing revenue, the location of our direct customers or distributors for products revenue, and the location where we perform our services for services revenue, was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
U.S.	$	298,592	$	301,868	$	318,127
International	627,672		653,637		604,586
Total revenue	$	926,264	$	955,505	$	922,713

Schedule Of Concentration Of Revenue From Individual Geographic Regions

The concentration of our revenue from individual geographic regions was as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011		September 24, 2010
U.S.	33	%	32	%	34	%
Japan	18	%	20	%	19	%
Europe	15	%	15	%	16	%
Taiwan	7	%	8	%	9	%
South Korea	17	%	13	%	12	%
China	6	%	6	%	5	%
Other	4	%	6	%	5	%

Schedule Of Long-Lived Tangible Assets, Net Of Accumulated Depreciation, By Geographic Region

Long-lived tangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation, by geographic region were as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
U.S.	$	211,647	$	87,486
International	43,029		29,621
Total long-lived tangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation	$	254,676	$	117,107

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Prepaid Expenses And Other Current Assets) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]
Prepaid assets	$ 14,955	$ 9,365
Other current assets	13,165	19,683
Income tax receivable	5,712	7,829
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$ 33,832	$ 36,877

XML

Comprehensive Income

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, Attributable to Parent [Abstract]

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income were as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011			September 24, 2010
	(in thousands)
Net income including controlling interest	$	265,134		$	310,582		$	282,827
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax	3,082			509			(1,290		)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax	380			(907		)	(622		)
Comprehensive income	268,596			310,184			280,915
Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to controlling interest	(1,140		)	(1,185		)	792
Comprehensive income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	267,456		$	308,999		$	281,707

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the following:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Accumulated foreign currency translation gains, net of tax of ($2,623) and ($2,653)	$	9,608	$	6,834
Accumulated unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($597) and ($387)	1,079		699
Total accumulated other comprehensive income	$	10,687	$	7,533

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Schedule Of Property, Plant, And Equipment, Estimated Useful Life

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using a straight-line method based on estimated useful lives as follows:

Systems and software	3 to 5 years
Machinery and equipment	3 to 8 years
Furniture and fixtures	5 to 8 years
Leasehold improvements	Lesser of useful life or related lease term
Buildings	Up to 40 years

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Schedule Of Allowance For Doubtful Accounts) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]
Balance at Beginning of Fiscal Year	$ 2,466	$ 2,040	$ 2,222
Charged to Operations	(379)	772	365
Deductions	(1,131)	(346)	(547)
Balance at End of Fiscal Year	$ 956	$ 2,466	$ 2,040

XML

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended				12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012 Y	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010	Jun. 29, 2012 Dolby Entertainment Technology [Member]	Sep. 28, 2012 Internal Use Software [Member] Y	Sep. 28, 2012 Maximum [Member]
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Maximum credit exposure	5.00%
Percent of revenue from significant customer	14.00%	13.00%	12.00%
Intangible assets with definite lives, useful life, minimum years	2				3
Intangible assets with definite lives, useful life, maximum years	17				5
Goodwill	$ 281,375,000	$ 263,260,000	$ 264,580,000	$ 263,500,000
Corrective royalties, percentage of license revenue						1.00%
Advertising expense	20,000,000	13,600,000	14,600,000
Transaction and re-measurement gains/losses	$ 200,000	$ 300,000	$ (1,900,000)

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Stockholders' Equity And Comprehensive Income (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	Total	Class A Common Stock [Member]	Class B Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-In Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]	Total Dolby Laboratories,Inc.[Member]	Controlling Interest [Member]	Comprehensive Income [Member]
Beginning balance, value at Sep. 25, 2009	$ 1,363,105	$ 53	$ 60	$ 478,979	$ 852,475	$ 9,541	$ 1,341,108	$ 21,997
Beginning balance, shares at Sep. 25, 2009		53,412,000	60,437,000
Net income	282,827				283,447		283,447	(620)	282,827
Translation adjustments, net of taxes	(1,290)					(1,118)	(1,118)	(172)	(1,290)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes	(622)					(622)	(622)		(622)
Distributions to controlling interest	(263)							(263)
Stock-based compensation expense	27,694			27,694			27,694
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense	827			827			827
Repurchase of common stock	(241,362)	(4)		(241,358)			(241,362)
Repurchase of common stock, shares		(4,148,000)
Tax benefit/(deficiency) from the stock incentive plans	24,134			24,134			24,134
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans, shares		1,420,000
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans, value	39,993	2		39,991			39,993
Shares repurchased for tax witholdings on vesting of restricted stock, shares		(51,000)
Shares repurchased for tax witholdings on vesting of restricted stock, value	(2,769)	0		(2,769)			(2,769)
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock, shares		2,223,000	(2,223,000)
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock, value		2	(2)
Exercise of Class B stock options, shares			1,014,000
Exercise of Class B stock options, value	2,405		1	2,404			2,405
Ending balance, value at Sep. 24, 2010	1,494,679	53	59	329,902	1,135,922	7,801	1,473,737	20,942	280,915
Ending balance, shares at Sep. 24, 2010		52,856,000	59,228,000
Net income	310,582				309,267		309,267	1,315	310,582
Translation adjustments, net of taxes	509					639	639	(130)	509
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes	(907)					(907)	(907)		(907)
Distributions to controlling interest	(290)							(290)
Stock-based compensation expense	43,218			43,218			43,218
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense	635			635			635
Repurchase of common stock	(192,410)	(4)		(192,406)			(192,410)
Repurchase of common stock, shares		(4,135,000)
Tax benefit/(deficiency) from the stock incentive plans	6,015			6,015			6,015
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans, shares		1,079,000
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans, value	26,787	1		26,786			26,787
Shares repurchased for tax witholdings on vesting of restricted stock, shares		(86,000)
Shares repurchased for tax witholdings on vesting of restricted stock, value	(4,599)	0		(4,599)			(4,599)
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock, shares		2,147,000	(2,147,000)
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock, value		2	(2)
Exercise of Class B stock options, shares			479,000
Exercise of Class B stock options, value	1,131		1	1,130			1,131
Ending balance, value at Sep. 30, 2011	1,685,350	52	58	210,681	1,445,189	7,533	1,663,513	21,837	310,184
Ending balance, shares at Sep. 30, 2011		51,861,000	57,560,000
Net income	265,134				264,302		264,302	832	265,134
Translation adjustments, net of taxes	3,082					2,774	2,774	308
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes	380					380	380		380
Distributions to controlling interest	(13)							(13)
Stock-based compensation expense	47,184			47,184			47,184
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense	352			352			352
Repurchase of common stock	(268,203)	(7)		(268,184)	(12)		(268,203)
Repurchase of common stock, shares	(7,212,992)	(7,213,000)
Tax benefit/(deficiency) from the stock incentive plans	(3,585)			(3,585)			(3,585)
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans, shares		911,000
Class A common stock issued under employee stock plans, value	17,279	0		17,279			17,279
Shares repurchased for tax witholdings on vesting of restricted stock, shares		(106,000)
Shares repurchased for tax witholdings on vesting of restricted stock, value	(3,835)	0		(3,835)			(3,835)
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock, shares		1,044,000	(1,044,000)
Transfer of Class B common stock to Class A common stock, value		1	(1)
Exercise of Class B stock options, shares	456,000		83,000
Exercise of Class B stock options, value	108		0	108			108
Ending balance, value at Sep. 28, 2012	$ 1,743,233	$ 46	$ 57	$ 0	$ 1,709,479	$ 10,687	$ 1,720,269	$ 22,964	$ 268,596
Ending balance, shares at Sep. 28, 2012		46,497,000	56,599,000

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 24, 2010
Related party rent expense included in general and administrative expenses	$ 1,372,000	$ 1,372,000	$ 1,372,000
Distributed to principal stockholder	$ 100,000	$ 300,000	$ 300,000
Dolby Properties, LLC [Member]
Ownership interest	37.50%
Dolby Properties Brisbane, LLC [Member]
Ownership interest	49.00%
Dolby Properties Burbank, LLC [Member]
Ownership interest	49.00%
Dolby Properties United Kingdom, LLC [Member]
Ownership interest	49.00%
Dolby Properties, LP [Member]
Ownership interest	10.00%

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions

Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments

Cash, cash equivalents, and investments as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011 consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash	$	468,622	$	394,474
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	17,090		142,038
U.S. agency securities	—		15,000
Commercial paper	4,885		—
Municipal debt securities	2,003		—
Total cash and cash equivalents	492,600		551,512
Short-term investments:
U.S. agency securities	3,999		8,074
Commercial paper	19,414		—
Corporate bonds	107,243		52,645
Municipal debt securities	172,037		330,562
Total short-term investments	302,693		391,281
Long-term investments (1):
U.S. agency securities	21,013		6,845
Corporate bonds	112,993		124,313
Municipal debt securities	227,608		141,639
Total long-term investments	361,614		272,797
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments	$	1,156,907	$	1,215,590

(1) Our long-term investments have maturities that range from one to three years.

Our investment portfolio, which is recorded as cash equivalents, short-term investments, and long-term investments, consists of the following:

	September 28, 2012
	Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Corporate bonds	$	219,265	$	990	$	(19	)	$	220,236
Money market funds	17,090		—		—			17,090
Municipal debt securities	400,958		728		(38		)	401,648
U.S. agency securities	24,997		18		(3		)	25,012
Commercial paper	24,299		—		—			24,299
Cash equivalents and investments	$	686,609	$	1,736	$	(60	)	$	688,285
	September 30, 2011
	Cost		Unrealized  Gain		Unrealized  Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Corporate bonds	$	177,129	$	316	$	(487	)	$	176,958
Money market funds	142,038		—		—			142,038
Municipal debt securities	471,005		1,251		(55		)	472,201
U.S. agency securities	29,858		65		(4		)	29,919
Cash equivalents and investments	$	820,030	$	1,632	$	(546	)	$	821,116

We have classified all of our investments listed in the tables above as available-for-sale securities recorded at fair market value in our consolidated balance sheets, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Upon sale, amounts of gains and losses reclassified into earnings are determined based on specific identification of securities sold.

The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and the fair value for those available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position:

	September 28, 2012
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
U.S. agency securities	$	6,999	$	(3	)	$	—	$	—		$	6,999	$	(3	)
Municipal debt securities	87,705		(37		)	5,565		(1		)	93,270		(38		)
Corporate bonds	25,277		(19		)	—		—			25,277		(19		)
Total	$	119,981	$	(59	)	$	5,565	$	(1	)	$	125,546	$	(60	)
	September 30, 2011
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
U.S. agency securities	$	3,997	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,997	$	(4	)
Municipal debt securities	79,466		(52		)	2,081		(3		)	81,547		(55		)
Corporate bonds	87,613		(487		)	—		—			87,613		(487		)
Total	$	171,076	$	(543	)	$	2,081	$	(3	)	$	173,157	$	(546	)

The unrealized losses on our available-for-sale securities were primarily a result of unfavorable changes in interest rates subsequent to the initial purchase of these securities. As of September 28, 2012, we had certain securities that were in an unrealized loss position. We do not intend to sell, nor will we need to sell, these securities before we recover the associated unrealized losses. We expect to recover the full carrying value of these securities. As a result, we do not consider any portion of the unrealized losses at September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011 to be an other-than-temporary impairment, nor do we consider any of the unrealized losses to be credit losses.

The following tables summarize the amortized cost and estimated fair value of short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments based on stated maturities as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011:

	September 28, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	302,154	$	302,693
Due in 1 to 2 years	209,302		209,871
Due in 2 to 3 years	151,174		151,743
Total	$	662,630	$	664,307

	September 30, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	390,559	$	391,281
Due in 1 to 2 years	213,487		213,921
Due in 2 to 3 years	58,947		58,876
Total	$	662,993	$	664,078

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consists of the following:

	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Trade accounts receivable	$	43,565		$	59,831
Accounts receivable related to patent administration program	886			4,450
Accounts receivable, gross	44,451			64,281
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts	(956		)	(2,466		)
Accounts receivable, net	$	43,495		$	61,815

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	Balance at Beginning of Fiscal Year		Charged to Operations			Deductions			Balance at End of Fiscal Year
	(in thousands)
For fiscal year ended September 24, 2010	$	2,222	$	365		$	(547	)	$	2,040
For fiscal year ended September 30, 2011	2,040		772			(346		)	2,466
For fiscal year ended September 28, 2012	2,466		(379		)	(1,131		)	956

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Raw materials	$	4,403	$	10,821
Work in process	—		2,942
Finished goods	12,297		12,481
Inventories	$	16,700	$	26,244

We have included $6.5 million of raw materials inventory within other non-current assets in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 28, 2012. This inventory was purchased in bulk in fiscal 2012 to obtain a significant volume discount, and is expected to be consumed over a period that exceeds 12 months. We have reviewed anticipated consumption rates of this inventory and do not believe there to be material risk of obsolescence prior to the ultimate sale of the inventory. As a result, no valuation reserve has been recorded as of September 28, 2012. All inventory was classified as current as of September 30, 2011.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Prepaid assets	$	14,955	$	9,365
Other current assets	13,165		19,683
Income tax receivable	5,712		7,829
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	33,832	$	36,877

Other current assets include assets held for sale of $1.5 million as of September 30, 2011 representing digital cinema equipment that we leased to exhibitors beginning in fiscal 2005 in an effort to encourage the cinema industry to transition to digital cinema. The majority of these assets were sold in fiscal 2011, with the remainder sold during fiscal 2012.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Land	$	48,227		$	12,778
Buildings	27,266			26,623
Leasehold improvements	68,352			41,302
Machinery and equipment	29,070			20,845
Computer systems and software	86,266			62,897
Furniture and fixtures	13,158			10,113
Products provided under operating leases	—			1,060
Construction in progress	79,965			11,466
	352,304			187,084
Less: accumulated depreciation	(97,628		)	(69,977		)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	254,676		$	117,107

Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was $30.6 million, $24.1 million, and $17.8 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, and is included in cost of products, cost of services, research and development expenses, sales and marketing expenses, and general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In fiscal 2012, we purchased an approximately 354,000 square foot property in San Francisco, California for approximately $109.8 million. We allocated $35.5 million of the purchase price of the property to land and $74.3 million to building, based on a fair value analysis. This fair value analysis utilized a combination of an income approach and a cost approach in conjunction with a consideration of comparable transactions in the San Francisco marketplace. After making certain improvements to the property to prepare the building for our use, we intend to use the space as our worldwide headquarters. As of September 28, 2012, construction in progress includes the book value of the building and related costs of construction.

Our products provided under operating leases represent digital cinema equipment that we leased to exhibitors beginning in fiscal 2005 in an effort to encourage the cinema industry to transition to digital cinema. During fiscal 2010, certain events occurred that indicated that the carrying value of our products provided under operating leases may not be recoverable. These events included a reduction in expected virtual print fees and a reduction in market prices for digital cinema equipment. As a result, we concluded that sufficient indicators existed to require an impairment analysis during fiscal 2010.

Based on our estimates of the undiscounted future cash flows from virtual print fees and the potential sale value of the equipment, our analysis determined that the equipment was impaired. Accordingly, we estimated the fair market value of the equipment based on potential sale price estimates and recorded the excess of the carrying value over the fair market value as an impairment charge. During fiscal 2010, we recorded an impairment charge of $9.6 million related to our products provided under operating leases, which is included in the impairment of products provided under operating leases line item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

During fiscal 2010, management committed to a plan to sell one of our properties in the U.K. that indicated that the carrying value of the land and building may not be recoverable. Based on our estimates of the undiscounted future cash flows from this building, our analysis determined that the building was impaired. Accordingly, we estimated the fair market value of the property based on potential sales price estimates. We recorded the excess of the carrying value over the fair market value of the land and building as impairment charges of $1.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, within the restructuring charges line item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The building is held by an entity where we are the managing member and our principal stockholder is the limited member, but with a majority ownership of the entity. Therefore, the impairment amount reflected in our restructuring charges line item for fiscal 2010 is offset by the share of the charge attributable to the limited member, or $1.7 million, in our net income attributable to controlling interest line item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The property did not meet the criteria for held for sale classification as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012							September 30, 2011
	Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net
	(in thousands)
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
Acquired patents and technology	$	79,213	$	(40,071	)	$	39,142	$	61,611	$	(32,146	)	$	29,465
Customer relationships	30,679		(16,386		)	14,293		30,748		(12,821		)	17,927
Customer contracts	—		—			—		6,063		(6,063		)	—
Other intangibles	20,925		(17,834		)	3,091		20,308		(16,127		)	4,181
Total	$	130,817	$	(74,291	)	$	56,526	$	118,730	$	(67,157	)	$	51,573

Amortization expense for our intangible assets was $13.2 million, $19.8 million, and $17.3 million in fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, and is included in cost of licensing, cost of products, research and development, and sales and marketing expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

As of September 28, 2012, our expected annual amortization expense of our intangible assets in future periods is as follows:

	Amortization
Fiscal Year	Expense
	(in thousands)
2013	$	15,605
2014	13,473
2015	11,017
2016	8,849
2017	5,736
Thereafter	1,846
Total	$	56,526

The following table outlines changes to the carrying amount of goodwill:

	Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	264,580
Acquired goodwill	182
Translation adjustments	(1,502		)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	263,260
Acquired goodwill	15,988
Translation adjustments	2,127
Balance at September 28, 2012	$	281,375

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Accrued royalties	$	2,391	$	1,947
Amounts payable to joint licensing program partners	35,492		42,502
Accrued compensation and benefits	47,331		41,168
Accrued professional fees	4,893		5,727
Other accrued liabilities	25,985		25,691
Accrued liabilities	$	116,092	$	117,035

Other Non-Current Liabilities

Other non-current liabilities consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Supplemental retirement plan obligations	$	2,042	$	1,811
Non-current tax liabilities	20,862		13,070
Other liabilities	16,933		8,574
Other non-current liabilities	$	39,837	$	23,455

See Note 8 “Income Taxes” for additional information related to tax liabilities.

Sales Tax

We account for sales tax on a net basis by excluding sales tax from our revenue.

Release of Value-Added Tax (“VAT”) Reserves

During fiscal 2011 we completed our analysis of recent VAT law changes enacted in the European Union and other foreign jurisdictions. Based on this analysis, we released $3.2 million of VAT reserves and related estimated penalties which were recorded as reductions of general and administrative expense. Additionally, we released $1.4 million of VAT-related interest reserves, which was recorded as a reduction of interest expense. These liabilities were previously included in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

Revenue from Material Customer

In the fiscal years ended September 28, 2012, September 30, 2011 and September 24, 2010 revenue from one customer was $126.7 million, $124.5 million and $113.3 million, respectively, or 14%, 13% and 12% of revenue for each fiscal year, respectively.

XML

Acquisitions (Details) (IMM Sound, S.A. [Member], USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012	Jul. 19, 2012
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Gross purchase price		$ 26.5
Cash payment		18.4
Debt repayment		0.6
Net tangible liabilities assumed		7.5
Net purchase price		18.0
Cash acquired		0.4
Indemnification assets amount		6.0
Deferred tax liability for acquired intangible assets	3.2
Acquisition-related transaction costs	$ 0.4
Developed Technology [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Estimated useful life	5
Trade Name [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Estimated useful life	1

XML

Geographic Data (Schedule Of Long-Lived Assets, Net Of Accumulated Depreciation, By Geographic Region) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Segments, Geographical Areas [Abstract]
U.S.	$ 211,647	$ 87,486
International	43,029	29,621
Total long-lived tangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation	$ 254,676	$ 117,107

XML

Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation (Summary Of Restricted Stock Units Issued To Officers, Directors, And Employees Under 2005 Stock Incentive Plan) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 28, 2012
Stockholders' Equity And Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]
Shares, Non-vested at September 30, 2011	946
Shares, Granted	2,157
Shares, Vested	(387)
Shares, Forfeitures	(144)
Shares, Non-vested at September 28, 2012	2,572
Weighted Average Fair Value, Non-vested at September 24, 2010	$ 53.71
Weighted Average Fair Value, Granted	$ 33.91
Weighted Average Fair Value, Vested	$ 50.78
Weighted Average Fair Value, Forfeitures	$ 45.90
Weighted Average Fair Value, Non-vested at September 30, 2011	$ 37.98

XML

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Composition Of Certain Financial Statement Captions [Abstract]

Schedule Of Cash, Cash Equivalents, And Investments

Cash, cash equivalents, and investments as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011 consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash	$	468,622	$	394,474
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	17,090		142,038
U.S. agency securities	—		15,000
Commercial paper	4,885		—
Municipal debt securities	2,003		—
Total cash and cash equivalents	492,600		551,512
Short-term investments:
U.S. agency securities	3,999		8,074
Commercial paper	19,414		—
Corporate bonds	107,243		52,645
Municipal debt securities	172,037		330,562
Total short-term investments	302,693		391,281
Long-term investments (1):
U.S. agency securities	21,013		6,845
Corporate bonds	112,993		124,313
Municipal debt securities	227,608		141,639
Total long-term investments	361,614		272,797
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments	$	1,156,907	$	1,215,590

(1) Our long-term investments have maturities that range from one to three years.

Schedule Of Investment Portfolio Recorded As Cash Equivalents, Short-Term Investments, And Long-Term Investments

Our investment portfolio, which is recorded as cash equivalents, short-term investments, and long-term investments, consists of the following:

	September 28, 2012
	Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Corporate bonds	$	219,265	$	990	$	(19	)	$	220,236
Money market funds	17,090		—		—			17,090
Municipal debt securities	400,958		728		(38		)	401,648
U.S. agency securities	24,997		18		(3		)	25,012
Commercial paper	24,299		—		—			24,299
Cash equivalents and investments	$	686,609	$	1,736	$	(60	)	$	688,285
	September 30, 2011
	Cost		Unrealized  Gain		Unrealized  Loss			Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Corporate bonds	$	177,129	$	316	$	(487	)	$	176,958
Money market funds	142,038		—		—			142,038
Municipal debt securities	471,005		1,251		(55		)	472,201
U.S. agency securities	29,858		65		(4		)	29,919
Cash equivalents and investments	$	820,030	$	1,632	$	(546	)	$	821,116

Schedule Of Gross Unrealized Losses And The Fair Value For Available-For-Sale Securities

The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and the fair value for those available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position:

	September 28, 2012
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
U.S. agency securities	$	6,999	$	(3	)	$	—	$	—		$	6,999	$	(3	)
Municipal debt securities	87,705		(37		)	5,565		(1		)	93,270		(38		)
Corporate bonds	25,277		(19		)	—		—			25,277		(19		)
Total	$	119,981	$	(59	)	$	5,565	$	(1	)	$	125,546	$	(60	)
	September 30, 2011
	Less than 12 months					12 months or greater					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(in thousands)
U.S. agency securities	$	3,997	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,997	$	(4	)
Municipal debt securities	79,466		(52		)	2,081		(3		)	81,547		(55		)
Corporate bonds	87,613		(487		)	—		—			87,613		(487		)
Total	$	171,076	$	(543	)	$	2,081	$	(3	)	$	173,157	$	(546	)

Schedule Of Amortized Cost And Estimated Fair Value Of Short-Term And Long-Term Available-For-Sale Investments Based On Stated Maturities

The following tables summarize the amortized cost and estimated fair value of short-term and long-term available-for-sale investments based on stated maturities as of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011:

	September 28, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	302,154	$	302,693
Due in 1 to 2 years	209,302		209,871
Due in 2 to 3 years	151,174		151,743
Total	$	662,630	$	664,307

	September 30, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	390,559	$	391,281
Due in 1 to 2 years	213,487		213,921
Due in 2 to 3 years	58,947		58,876
Total	$	662,993	$	664,078

Schedule Of Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consists of the following:

	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Trade accounts receivable	$	43,565		$	59,831
Accounts receivable related to patent administration program	886			4,450
Accounts receivable, gross	44,451			64,281
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts	(956		)	(2,466		)
Accounts receivable, net	$	43,495		$	61,815

Schedule Of Allowance For Doubtful Accounts

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts	Balance at Beginning of Fiscal Year		Charged to Operations			Deductions			Balance at End of Fiscal Year
	(in thousands)
For fiscal year ended September 24, 2010	$	2,222	$	365		$	(547	)	$	2,040
For fiscal year ended September 30, 2011	2,040		772			(346		)	2,466
For fiscal year ended September 28, 2012	2,466		(379		)	(1,131		)	956

Schedule Of Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Raw materials	$	4,403	$	10,821
Work in process	—		2,942
Finished goods	12,297		12,481
Inventories	$	16,700	$	26,244

Schedule Of Prepaid Expenses And Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Prepaid assets	$	14,955	$	9,365
Other current assets	13,165		19,683
Income tax receivable	5,712		7,829
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	33,832	$	36,877

Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012			September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Land	$	48,227		$	12,778
Buildings	27,266			26,623
Leasehold improvements	68,352			41,302
Machinery and equipment	29,070			20,845
Computer systems and software	86,266			62,897
Furniture and fixtures	13,158			10,113
Products provided under operating leases	—			1,060
Construction in progress	79,965			11,466
	352,304			187,084
Less: accumulated depreciation	(97,628		)	(69,977		)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	254,676		$	117,107

Schedule Of Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012							September 30, 2011
	Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Net
	(in thousands)
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
Acquired patents and technology	$	79,213	$	(40,071	)	$	39,142	$	61,611	$	(32,146	)	$	29,465
Customer relationships	30,679		(16,386		)	14,293		30,748		(12,821		)	17,927
Customer contracts	—		—			—		6,063		(6,063		)	—
Other intangibles	20,925		(17,834		)	3,091		20,308		(16,127		)	4,181
Total	$	130,817	$	(74,291	)	$	56,526	$	118,730	$	(67,157	)	$	51,573

Schedule Of Future Amortization Expense

As of September 28, 2012, our expected annual amortization expense of our intangible assets in future periods is as follows:

	Amortization
Fiscal Year	Expense
	(in thousands)
2013	$	15,605
2014	13,473
2015	11,017
2016	8,849
2017	5,736
Thereafter	1,846
Total	$	56,526

Schedule Of Goodwill

The following table outlines changes to the carrying amount of goodwill:

	Total
	(in thousands)
Balance at September 24, 2010	$	264,580
Acquired goodwill	182
Translation adjustments	(1,502		)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	263,260
Acquired goodwill	15,988
Translation adjustments	2,127
Balance at September 28, 2012	$	281,375

Schedule Of Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Accrued royalties	$	2,391	$	1,947
Amounts payable to joint licensing program partners	35,492		42,502
Accrued compensation and benefits	47,331		41,168
Accrued professional fees	4,893		5,727
Other accrued liabilities	25,985		25,691
Accrued liabilities	$	116,092	$	117,035

Schedule Of Other Non-Current Liabilities

Other non-current liabilities consist of the following:

	September 28, 2012		September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Supplemental retirement plan obligations	$	2,042	$	1,811
Non-current tax liabilities	20,862		13,070
Other liabilities	16,933		8,574
Other non-current liabilities	$	39,837	$	23,455

XML

Income Taxes (Summary Of Tax Effects Of The Temporary Differences Between Carrying Amounts And Amounts Used For Tax) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 28, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Investments	$ 2,096	$ 1,932
Accounts receivable	182	417
Inventories	3,678	3,304
Net operating loss	2,863	2,987
U.S. state taxes	177	5,749
Accrued expenses	10,140	9,216
Stock-based compensation	25,720	19,547
Revenue recognition	63,843	67,154
Foreign tax credits	3,410	3,528
Other	7,338	6,040
Total gross deferred income tax assets	119,447	119,874
Less: valuation allowance	0	0
Total deferred income tax assets	119,447	119,874
Translation adjustment	(904)	(837)
Intangibles	(3,746)	(595)
International earnings	(6,373)	(1,485)
Depreciation and amortization	(6,761)	(11,422)
Unrealized gain on investments	(768)	(558)
Deferred income tax assets, net	100,895	104,977
Current deferred income tax assets	80,956	90,869
Long-term deferred income tax assets, net	$ 19,939	$ 14,108

XML

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Quarterly Financial Data [Abstract]

Schedule Of Selected Quarterly Financial Data

	Fiscal Quarter Ended
	September 28, 2012		June 29, 2012		March 30, 2012		December 30, 2011		September 30, 2011		July 1, 2011		April 1, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
Licensing	$	191,154	$	178,436	$	225,349	$	199,624	$	205,747	$	181,790	$	214,627	$	188,176
Products	27,628		22,132		27,228		26,400		30,842		28,395		26,347		46,027
Services	5,973		7,304		7,682		7,354		7,179		8,814		9,052		8,509
Total revenue	224,755		207,872		260,259		233,378		243,768		218,999		250,026		242,712
Cost of revenue	26,994		21,031		23,592		20,410		25,642		27,933		28,457		29,139
Gross margin	197,761		186,841		236,667		212,968		218,126		191,066		221,569		213,573
Income before taxes and controlling interest	72,951		70,321		122,515		103,204		116,632		90,451		122,494		111,066
Net income attributable to Dolby Laboratories, Inc.	$	51,494	$	51,529	$	88,120	$	73,159	$	79,071	$	61,748	$	82,061	$	86,387
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.49	$	0.48	$	0.81	$	0.67	$	0.72	$	0.55	$	0.73	$	0.77
Diluted	$	0.49	$	0.48	$	0.81	$	0.67	$	0.71	$	0.55	$	0.72	$	0.76
Shares outstanding:
Basic	104,079		106,328		108,415		108,884		110,063		111,494		112,140		112,035
Diluted	104,915		107,202		109,170		109,443		110,662		112,349		113,346		113,713

XML

Legal Proceedings

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2012

Loss Contingency, Information about Litigation Matters [Abstract]

Legal Proceedings

Legal Proceedings

In March 1997, an unrelated third party filed a lawsuit against us alleging breach of a written agreement. In April 2002, we settled the dispute and agreed to pay a total of $30.0 million, without interest, in ten equal annual installments of $3.0 million per year beginning in June 2002. We recorded this liability at its present value of $24.2 million on the consolidated balance sheet. Interest related to this liability is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Other than such payments, neither party has any material obligations as a result of the settlement. As of September 28, 2012 and September 30, 2011, no amounts were due under this settlement.

During the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2011, we filed patent infringement lawsuits in the U.S. and in Germany against Research in Motion Ltd. (“RIM”), a previously unlicensed user of certain of our patented technologies. In July 2011, RIM signed a license agreement with Via Licensing Corporation (“Via”), our wholly-owned subsidiary and the licensing administrator for the patent pool which includes Dolby’s essential AAC patents, which entitled us to back royalties for Dolby technologies used in RIM’s products. Based on this license agreement, we recognized revenue of $15.2 million during fiscal 2011 for back royalties related to the Dolby patents and Via administration fees, including $11.3 million attributable to periods prior to fiscal 2011. We also received interest related to these back royalties of $2.2 million, which was recognized as interest income in fiscal 2011.

We are involved in various legal proceedings from time to time arising from the normal course of business activities, including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights, commercial, employment, and other matters. In our opinion, resolution of these pending matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our operating results or financial condition. Given the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could materially affect our future operating results or financial condition in a particular period; however, based on the information known by us as of the date of this filing and the rules and regulations applicable to the preparation of our financial statements, any such amount is either immaterial or it is not possible to provide an estimated amount of any such potential loss.