10-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number: 0-51153

FEDFIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

United States	25-1828028
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
Donner at Sixth Street, Monessen, Pennsylvania	15062
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Issuer’s telephone number: (724) 684-6800

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company þ
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by nonaffiliates as of June 29, 2007 was approximately $23,637,000.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 11, 2008 was 6,479,100.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.

INDEX

	Page
PART I
Item 1. Business	K-1
Item 1A. Risk Factors	K-15
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments	K-18
Item 2. Properties	K-18
Item 3. Legal Proceedings	K-19
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	K-19
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	K-20
Item 6. Selected Financial Data	K-20
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	K-21
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	K-42
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	K-42
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	K-42
Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures	K-42
Item 9B. Other Information	K-43
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance	K-43
Item 11. Executive Compensation	K-43
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	K-43
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	K-44
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services	K-44
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	K-44
SIGNATURES
EX-23.0
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.0

          This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are not historical facts, rather statements based on FedFirst Financial Corporation’s current expectations regarding its business strategies, intended results and future performance. Forward-looking statements are preceded by terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends” and similar expressions.

          Management’s ability to predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could affect actual results include the following: interest rate trends; the general economic climate in the market area in which FedFirst Financial Corporation operates, as well as nationwide; FedFirst Financial Corporation’s ability to control costs and expenses; competitive products and pricing; loan delinquency rates and changes in federal and state legislation and regulation. Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. FedFirst Financial Corporation assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

     FedFirst Financial Corporation (“FedFirst Financial” or the “Company”) is a federally chartered savings and loan holding company established in 1999 to be the holding company for First Federal Savings Bank (“First Federal” or the “Bank”). FedFirst Financial’s business activity is the ownership of the outstanding capital stock of First Federal.

     First Federal is a federally chartered savings bank. We operate as a community-oriented financial institution offering residential, multi-family and commercial mortgages, consumer loans and commercial business loans to individuals and businesses from nine locations in southwestern Pennsylvania. We conduct insurance brokerage activities through an 80%-owned subsidiary.

     FedFirst Financial Mutual Holding Company (“FFMHC”) is our federally chartered mutual holding company parent. As a mutual holding company, FFMHC is a non-stock company that has as its members the depositors of First Federal. FFMHC does not engage in any business activity other than owning a majority of the common stock of FedFirst Financial. So long as we remain in the mutual holding company form of organization, FFMHC will own a majority of the outstanding shares of FedFirst Financial.

     On April 6, 2005, FedFirst Financial completed its initial public offering. The Company sold 2,975,625 shares of common stock, par value $0.01. In connection with the offering, the Company also sold 3,636,875 shares of common stock to FFMHC at $0.01 per share. As a result, FFMHC owned 55% of the Company’s original issuance of common stock. Proceeds from the offering totaled $28.7 million, net of stock issuance costs of approximately $1.1 million.

     On September 21, 2006 the Company issued 95,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the FedFirst Financial Corporation 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. As a result, the issued shares outstanding increased to 6,707,500 which reduced FFMHC’s ownership to 54% of the Company’s common stock.

     Our website address is www.firstfederal-savings.com. Information on our website should not be considered a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

K-1

Market Area

     Our primary market area is the mid-Monongahela Valley, which is located in the southern suburban area of metropolitan Pittsburgh. Our nine banking offices are located in Fayette, Washington and Westmoreland counties. Generally, our offices are located in small industrial communities that, in the past, relied extensively on the steel industry. Until the mid-1970s, these communities flourished. However, in the past 30 years, the economy of the mid-Monongahela Valley has diminished in direct correlation with the decline in the United States steel industry. With the decline of the steel industry, Fayette, Washington and Westmoreland counties now have smaller and more diversified economies, with employment in services constituting the primary source of employment in all three counties.

     In the past, the communities in which our offices are located provided a stable customer base for traditional thrift products, such as passbook savings, certificates of deposit and residential mortgages. Following the closing of the area’s steel mills, population and employment trends declined. The population in many of the smaller communities in our market area continues to shrink as the younger population leaves to seek better and more reliable employment. As a result, the median age of our customers has been increasing. With an aging customer base and little new real estate development, the lending opportunities in our primary market area are limited. To counter these trends, we expanded into communities that are experiencing population growth and economic expansion. In March 2006, we entered into a five-year lease for a branch in Peters Township in Washington County, which opened in July 2006. In January 2007, we entered into a 10-year lease for a branch located in the downtown area of Washington, Pennsylvania, which opened in June 2007.

Competition

     We face significant competition for the attraction of deposits and origination of loans. Our most direct competition for deposits has historically come from the several financial institutions operating in our market area and from other financial service companies, such as brokerage firms, credit unions and insurance companies. We also face competition for investors’ funds from money market funds, mutual funds and other corporate and government securities. At June 30, 2007, which is the most recent date for which data is available from the FDIC, we held approximately 0.26% of the deposits in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Banks owned by The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., National City Corporation and Citizens Financial Group, Inc., all of which are large bank holding companies, also operate in our market area. These institutions are significantly larger than us and, therefore, have significantly greater resources.

     Our competition for loans comes primarily from financial institutions in our market area and, to a lesser extent, from other financial service providers, such as mortgage companies and mortgage brokers. Competition for loans also comes from the increasing number of non-depository financial service companies entering the mortgage market, such as insurance companies, securities companies and specialty finance companies.

     We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Technological advances, for example, have lowered barriers to entry, allowed banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the Internet and made it possible for non-depository institutions to offer products and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Changes in federal law permit affiliation among banks, securities firms and insurance companies, which promotes a competitive environment in the financial services industry. Competition for deposits and the origination of loans could limit our growth in the future.

Lending Activities

     General. The largest segment of our loan portfolio is one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. The other significant segments of our loan portfolio are multi-family and commercial real estate loans, construction loans, consumer loans and commercial business loans. We originate loans primarily for investment purposes. In recent years, low loan demand in our market area has limited our ability to grow our loan portfolio. From time to time, we have purchased loans to supplement our origination efforts.

K-2

     One-to-Four Family Residential Mortgage Loans. Our primary lending activity has historically been the origination of mortgage loans to enable borrowers to purchase or refinance existing homes located in the greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area. We offer fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans with terms up to 30 years. Borrower demand for adjustable-rate loans versus fixed-rate loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates, and the difference between the interest rates and loan fees offered for fixed-rate mortgage loans and the initial period interest rates and loan fees for adjustable-rate loans. The relative amount of fixed-rate mortgage loans and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment. The loan fees charged, interest rates and other provisions of mortgage loans are determined by us on the basis of our own pricing criteria and competitive market conditions.

     Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate mortgage loans generally adjust annually after an initial fixed period that ranges from one to ten years. Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate loans generally are adjusted to a rate typically equal to 2.75% or 3.00% above the applicable index. We use the one-year constant maturity Treasury index for loans that adjust annually and the three-year constant maturity Treasury index for loans that adjust every three years. The maximum amount by which the interest rate may be increased or decreased is generally 2% per adjustment period and the lifetime interest rate cap is generally 6% over the initial interest rate of the loan.

     We have purchased newly originated single family mortgage loans in the past to supplement our origination activities. The properties securing the loans are located throughout the country. We underwrote all of the purchased loans to the same standards as loans originated by us. We may purchase additional loans in the future to supplement our origination activities. At December 31, 2007, purchased residential loans totaled $35.0 million.

     While one-to-four family residential real estate loans are normally originated with up to 30-year terms, such loans may remain outstanding for shorter periods because borrowers often prepay their loans in full upon sale of the property pledged as security or upon refinancing the original loan. Therefore, average loan maturity is a function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in the real estate market, prevailing interest rates and the interest rates payable on outstanding loans.

     We generally do not make conventional loans with loan-to-value ratios exceeding 97%. Loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80% generally require private mortgage insurance or additional collateral. We require all properties securing mortgage loans to be appraised by a Board-approved, independent appraiser. We generally require title insurance on all first mortgage loans. Borrowers must obtain hazard insurance, and flood insurance for loans on property located in a flood zone, before closing the loan.

     In an effort to provide financing for low and moderate income and first-time buyers, we offer a special home buyers program. We offer residential mortgage loans through this program to qualified individuals and originate the loans using modified underwriting guidelines, including reduced fees and loan conditions. We do not engage in subprime lending.

     Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate Loans. We offer fixed and floating rate mortgage loans secured by commercial property and multi-family real estate. Our commercial and multi-family real estate loans are generally secured by apartment buildings, office buildings, or manufacturing facilities. In addition to originating these loans, we also participate in loans originated at other financial institutions in the region.

     We originate a variety of fixed and floating rate commercial and multi-family real estate loans with terms up to 25 years. Loans are secured by first mortgages, and amounts generally do not exceed 80% of the property’s appraised value.

     As part of our efforts to increase our loan portfolio, we had purchased newly originated multi-family real estate loans prior to 2006. The properties securing the loans are located in 9 states throughout the country. We desired geographic diversification among the purchased loans so that we would not concentrate exposure to changes in any particular local or regional economy. We underwrote all of the purchased loans to the same standards as loans originated by us. At December 31, 2007, purchased multi-family real estate loans totaled $10.9 million.

     At December 31, 2007, our largest commercial or multi-family real estate loan was $1.8 million and was secured by multi-family apartment buildings. This loan was performing in accordance with its original terms at December 31, 2007.

K-3

     At December 31, 2007, loan participations totaled $5.5 million. All of the properties securing these loans are located in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Our largest participation loan was $1.1 million and we are a 12.5% participant.

     Construction Loans. We may originate loans to individuals and, to a lesser extent, builders to finance the construction of residential dwellings. We also make construction loans for commercial development projects, including apartment buildings, and owner-occupied properties used for businesses. Our residential construction loans generally provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase, which is usually 12 months. At the end of the construction phase, the loan generally converts to a permanent mortgage loan. Loans generally can be made with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 97% on residential construction and 80% on commercial construction. Before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by an independent licensed appraiser. We also will require an inspection of the property before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan.

     At December 31, 2007, our largest outstanding residential construction loan commitment was for $1.0 million, of which substantially the entire amount had been disbursed. At December 31, 2007, there were no outstanding commercial construction loan commitments. These loans were performing in accordance with their original terms at December 31, 2007.

     Commercial Business Loans. We originate commercial business loans to professionals, individuals, and small businesses in our market area. We offer installment loans for a variety of business needs including capital improvements and equipment acquisition. These loans are secured by business assets such as accounts receivable, inventory, and equipment, and are typically backed by the personal guarantee of the borrower. We originate working capital lines of credit to finance the short-term needs of businesses. These credit lines are repaid by seasonal cash flows from operations.

     When evaluating commercial business loans, we perform a detailed financial analysis of the borrower and/or guarantor which includes but is not limited to: cash flow analysis, debt service capabilities, review of industry (geographic and economic conditions) and collateral analysis.

     At December 31, 2007, our largest commercial business loan relationship was a $1.9 million line of credit, of which $457,000 was outstanding. This loan was performing in accordance with its original terms at December 31, 2007.

     Consumer Loans. Our consumer loans include home equity lines of credit, home equity installment loans, home improvement loans, loans on savings accounts, and personal lines of credit.

     The procedures for underwriting consumer loans include an assessment of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although the applicant’s creditworthiness is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral, if any, to the proposed loan amount.

     We offer home equity installment loans and home equity lines of credit with a maximum combined loan-to-value ratio of 100%. During 2007, the Company discontinued offering home equity installment loans with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 125%. Home equity lines of credit have adjustable rates of interest that are indexed to the prime rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal. Home equity installment loans have fixed interest rates and terms that range up to 30 years.

     We offered home improvement loans in amounts up to $25,000. These loans had fixed interest rates and terms that ranged up to 20 years. Our home improvement loans were made under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Title I program and are insured by the Federal Housing Administration against the risk of default for up to 90% of the loan amount.

     We offer secured consumer loans in amounts up to $20,000. These loans have fixed interest rates and terms that range from one to 10 years. We offer unsecured consumer loans in amounts up to $10,000. These loans have fixed interest rates and terms that range from one to five years.

K-4

Loan Underwriting Risks

     Adjustable-Rate Loans. While we anticipate that adjustable-rate loans will better offset the adverse effects of an increase in interest rates as compared to fixed-rate mortgages, the increased mortgage payments required of adjustable-rate loan borrowers in a rising interest rate environment could cause an increase in delinquencies and defaults. The marketability of the underlying property also may be adversely affected in a high interest rate environment. In addition, although adjustable-rate mortgage loans help make our asset base more responsive to changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is limited by the annual and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits.

     Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate Loans. Loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Of primary concern in commercial and multi-family real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and cash flow potential of the project. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on successful operation and management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent than residential real estate loans to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. To monitor cash flow on income properties, we require borrowers and guarantors, if any, to provide annual financial statements regarding the commercial and multi-family real estate. In reaching a decision on whether to grant a commercial or multi-family real estate loan, we consider the cash flow of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability, and the value of the underlying property. We also may look to the financial strength of any related entities in approving the request.

     We have generally required that the properties securing these real estate loans have a debt service coverage ratio (cash flow available to service debt / debt service) of at least 1.25x. Environmental surveys are obtained for requests greater than $1.0 million when circumstances suggest the possibility of the presence of hazardous materials.

     We underwrite all loan participations to our own underwriting standards. In addition, we also consider the financial strength and reputation of the lead lender. We require the lead lender to provide a full closing package as well as annual financial statements for the borrower and related entities so that we can conduct an annual loan review for all loan participations.

     Construction Loans. Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost (including interest) of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the building. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may be confronted, at or before the maturity of the loan, with a building having a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment. If we are forced to foreclose on a building before or at completion due to a default, there can be no assurance that we will be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs.

     Commercial Business Loans. Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial business loans are of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. A debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.25x is also applicable to commercial business loans. Further, any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value. We also maintain allowable advance rates for each collateral type to ensure coverage.

     Consumer Loans. Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly. In such cases, repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and the remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s

K-5

continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.

     Loan Originations, Purchases and Sales. Loan originations come from a number of sources. The primary source of loan originations are calling efforts, existing customers, walk-in traffic, loan brokers, advertising and referrals from customers. We advertise in newspapers that are widely circulated in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Accordingly, when our rates are competitive, we attract loans from throughout the Pittsburgh area. We generally originate loans for our portfolio and have not sold any loans in recent years with the exception of the sale of a majority of our student loan portfolio in 2006. Prior to 2006, we had purchased loans to supplement our own loan originations.

     Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Our lending activities follow written, nondiscriminatory, underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our Board of Directors and management. The Board of Directors has granted certain loan approval authority to a committee of officers. The loan committee approves all one-to-four family mortgages, construction loans and all consumer loans which exceed the authority level of certain officers of the Company. All commercial loans over $500,000 and loans or extensions to insiders require the approval of the Board of Directors. Certain officers of the Company may approve commercial loans up to $250,000 or as a group up to $500,000.

     Loans to One Borrower. The maximum amount that we may lend to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is limited, by regulation, to generally 15.0% of our unimpaired capital and surplus. At December 31, 2007, our regulatory limit on loans to one borrower was $4.5 million. At that date, our largest lending relationship was $2.0 million in commercial business loans. These loans were performing in accordance with their original terms at December 31, 2007.

     Loan Commitments. We issue commitments for fixed and adjustable-rate mortgage and commercial loans conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events. Commitments to originate mortgage loans are legally binding agreements to lend to our customers. Generally, our loan commitments expire after 45 days.

Investment Activities

     We have legal authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, Government-sponsored enterprise securities and securities of various federal agencies and of state and municipal governments, mortgage-backed securities and certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions. Within certain regulatory limits, we also may invest a portion of our assets in corporate securities and mutual funds. We also are required to maintain an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh stock. While we have the authority under applicable law and our investment policies to invest in derivative securities, we had no such investments at December 31, 2007.

     At December 31, 2007, our investment portfolio consisted primarily of Government-sponsored enterprise securities, mortgage-backed securities issued primarily by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae, guaranteed REMIC pass-through certificates and corporate debt securities.

     Our investment objectives are to provide and maintain liquidity, to provide collateral for pledging requirements, to establish an acceptable level of interest rate and credit risk, to provide an alternate source of low-risk investments when demand for loans is weak and to generate a favorable return. Our Board of Directors has the overall responsibility for the investment portfolio, including approval of the investment policy and appointment of the Investment Committee. The Investment Committee consists of six of our executive officers. The Investment Committee is responsible for implementation of the investment policy and monitoring our investment performance. Individual investment transactions are reviewed and ratified by the Board of Directors on a monthly basis.

Insurance Activities

     We conduct insurance brokerage activities through our 80%-owned subsidiary, Exchange Underwriters, Inc., which we acquired in 2002. Exchange Underwriters is a full-service, independent insurance agency that

K-6

offers property and casualty, commercial general liability, surety and other insurance products. Exchange Underwriters has agents and brokers licensed in more than 35 states. Exchange Underwriters generates revenues primarily from commissions paid by insurance companies with respect to the placement of insurance products.

Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds

     General. Deposits, borrowings and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. Loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions.

     Deposit Accounts. Substantially all of our depositors are residents of Pennsylvania. Deposits are attracted from within our market area through the offering of a broad selection of deposit products, including noninterest-bearing demand deposits (such as checking accounts), interest-bearing demand accounts (such as NOW and money market accounts), statement savings accounts and certificates of deposit. Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, liquidity needs, profitability, matching deposit and loan products and customer preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit mix and pricing weekly. Our current strategy is to offer competitive rates on all types of deposit products.

     In addition to accounts for individuals, we also offer deposit accounts designed for the businesses operating in our market area. Our business banking deposit products include commercial checking accounts, money market accounts and remote electronic deposit.

     Borrowings. We utilize advances from the FHLB and, to a limited extent, repurchase agreements to supplement our supply of investable funds. The FHLB functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital stock in the FHLB and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and certain of our mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States or Government-sponsored enterprises), provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made under several different programs, each having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth or on the FHLB’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness.

Personnel

     At December 31, 2007, we had 87 full-time employees and six part-time employees, including employees of our insurance agency subsidiary, none of whom is represented by a collective bargaining unit.

Subsidiaries

     FedFirst Financial’s only direct subsidiary is First Federal Savings Bank. First Federal Savings Bank’s only direct subsidiary is FedFirst Exchange Corporation. FedFirst Exchange Corporation owns an 80% interest in Exchange Underwriters, Inc.

K-7

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

     The Board of Directors annually elects the executive officers of FFMHC, FedFirst Financial and First Federal, who serve at the Board’s discretion. Our executive officers are:

Name	Position
John G. Robinson	President and Chief Executive Officer of FFMHC, FedFirst Financial and First Federal
Patrick G. O’Brien	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of FFMHC, FedFirst Financial and First Federal
Robert C. Barry, Jr.	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FFMHC, FedFirst Financial and First Federal
Richard B. Boyer	Vice President – Insurance of First Federal; President of Exchange Underwriters, Inc.
Henry B. Brown III	Vice President – Consumer and Mortgage Lending of First Federal
Geraldine A. Ferrara	Vice President – Branch Sales and Administration of First Federal
Jennifer L. George	Vice President – Assistant Controller of First Federal
Jamie L. Prah	Vice President – Controller and Treasurer of First Federal and Vice President of FFMHC and FedFirst Financial
DaCosta Smith, III	Vice President – Human Resources of First Federal and Vice President of FFMHC and FedFirst Financial

     Below is information regarding our executive officers who are not also directors. Ages presented are as of December 31, 2007.

     Patrick G. O’Brien has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of FedFirst Financial and First Federal since September 2005. Prior to working with FedFirst Financial, Mr. O’Brien served as Regional President and Senior Lender – Commercial Lending with WesBanco Bank, Inc., Washington, Pennsylvania, from March 2002 to August 2005. Before serving with WesBanco Bank, Mr. O’Brien was Senior Vice President of Commercial Lending with Wheeling National Bank from August 1999 to March 2002, and Vice President and District Manager (Retail Banking) at PNC from 1993 to 1999. Age 46.

     Robert C. Barry, Jr. has served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FedFirst Financial and First Federal since April 1, 2006. Prior to working with FedFirst Financial, Mr. Barry served as Senior Vice President of the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Age 64.

     Henry B. Brown III has served as Vice President of First Federal since August 2007. Prior to working with First Federal, Mr. Brown served as Senior Vice President – Treasury Management at WesBanco Bank, Inc. from May 2005 to August 2007 and as Owner/Partner of Good Deeds, Inc., a real estate services firm, from May 2002 to May 2005. Prior to working as Owner/Partner of Good Deeds, Inc., Mr. Brown held several positions at PNC Bank until February 2002. Age 56.

     Geraldine A. Ferrara joined First Federal in October 2005 as Vice President – Consumer Sales Manager. In August 2006, she was named Vice President – Branch Sales and Administration. Prior to working with First Federal, Ms. Ferrara served as Vice President – Market Manager at PNC Bank from June 2004 to October 2005 and as Vice President – Sector Service Manager from July 1999 to May 2004. Age 56.

     Jennifer L. George has served as Vice President of First Federal since July 2007 and Assistant Controller since January 2006. Prior to working with First Federal, Ms. George served as Accounts Payable Manager with Del Monte Foods from April 2005 to December 2005 and Accounting Manager at First Commonwealth, formerly Great American Federal, from January 2003 to December 2004. Age 36.

     Jamie L. Prah has served as Vice President – Controller and Treasurer of First Federal since February

K-8

2005. Prior to working with First Federal, Mr. Prah served as Corporate Controller of North Side Bank from July 2004 to February 2005. Before serving with North Side Bank, Mr. Prah was Vice President and Controller of Great American Federal from May 2002 to June 2004 and Assistant Vice President – Internal Audit from May 2000 to May 2002. Age 37.

     DaCosta Smith, III has served as the Vice President – Director of Human Resources for First Federal since 1992. Age 52.

REGULATION AND SUPERVISION

General

     First Federal, as an insured federal savings association, is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), as its primary federal regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as its deposits insurer. First Federal is a member of the FHLB System and its deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund managed by the FDIC. First Federal must file reports with the OTS and the FDIC concerning its activities and financial condition in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other savings associations. There are periodic examinations by the OTS and, under certain circumstances, the FDIC to evaluate First Federal’s safety and soundness and compliance with various regulatory requirements. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Any change in such policies, whether by the OTS, the FDIC or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on FedFirst Financial, FFMHC and First Federal and their operations. FedFirst Financial and FFMHC, as savings and loan holding companies, are required to file certain reports with, are subject to examination by, and otherwise must comply with the rules and regulations of the OTS. FedFirst Financial is also subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.

     Certain of the regulatory requirements that are applicable to First Federal, FedFirst Financial and FFMHC are described below. This description of statutes and regulations is not intended to be a complete explanation of such statutes and regulations and their effects on First Federal, FedFirst Financial and FFMHC and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual statutes and regulations.

Regulation of Federal Savings Associations

     Business Activities. Federal law and regulations govern the activities of federal savings banks, such as First Federal. Those laws and regulations delineate the nature and extent of the business activities in which federal savings associations may engage. In particular, certain lending authority for federal savings associations, e.g., commercial, non-residential real property loans and consumer loans, is limited to a specified percentage of the institution’s capital or assets.

     Capital Requirements. The OTS’s capital regulations require federal savings associations to meet three minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital to total assets ratio, a 4% leverage ratio (3% for institutions receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS examination rating system) and an 8% risk-based capital ratio. In addition, the prompt corrective action standards discussed below also establish, in effect, a minimum 2% tangible capital standard, a 4% leverage ratio (3% for institutions receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS system) and, together with the risk-based capital standard itself, a 4% Tier I risk-based capital standard. The OTS regulations also require that, in meeting the tangible, leverage and risk-based capital standards, institutions must generally deduct investments in and loans to subsidiaries engaged in activities as principal that are not permissible for a national bank.

     The risk-based capital standard requires federal savings institutions to maintain Tier I (core) and total capital (which is defined as core capital and supplementary capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 4% and 8%, respectively. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance

K-9

sheet assets, recourse obligations, residual interests and direct credit substitutes, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to 100%, assigned by the OTS capital regulation based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Core (Tier I) capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings), certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles other than certain mortgage servicing rights and credit card relationships. The components of supplementary (Tier II) capital currently include cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and up to 45% of unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of total capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital.

     The OTS also has authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon a determination that an institution’s capital level is or may become inadequate in light of the particular circumstances. At December 31, 2007 First Federal met each of these capital requirements. See Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. The OTS is required to take certain supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions, the severity of which depends upon the institution’s degree of undercapitalization. Generally, a savings association that has a ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of less than 8%, a ratio of Tier I (core) capital to risk-weighted assets of less than 4% or a ratio of core capital to total assets of less than 4% (3% or less for institutions with the highest examination rating) is considered to be “undercapitalized.” A savings association that has a total risk-based capital ratio less than 6%, a Tier I capital ratio of less than 3% or a leverage ratio that is less than 3% is considered to be “significantly undercapitalized” and a savings association that has a tangible capital to assets ratio equal to or less than 2% is deemed to be “critically undercapitalized.” Subject to a narrow exception, the OTS is required to appoint a receiver or conservator within specified time frames for an association that is “critically undercapitalized.” An association must file a capital restoration plan with the OTS within 45 days of the date it receives notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” Compliance with the plan must be guaranteed by any parent holding company. In addition, numerous mandatory supervisory actions become immediately applicable to an undercapitalized institution, including, but not limited to, increased monitoring by regulators and restrictions on growth, capital distributions and expansion. “Significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to more extensive mandatory regulatory actions. The OTS could also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors.

     Loans to One Borrower. Federal law provides that savings associations are generally subject to the limits on loans to one borrower applicable to national banks. Generally, subject to certain exceptions, a savings association may not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be lent, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if secured by specified readily-marketable collateral.

     Standards for Safety and Soundness. The federal banking agencies have adopted Interagency Guidelines prescribing Standards for Safety and Soundness. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the OTS determines that a savings institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the OTS may require the institution to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.

     Limitation on Capital Distributions. OTS regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by a savings institution, including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to stockholders of another institution in a cash-out merger. Under the regulations, an application to and the prior approval of the OTS is required before any capital distribution if the institution does not meet the criteria for “expedited treatment” of applications under OTS regulations (i.e., generally, examination and Community Reinvestment Act ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, the

K-10

institution would be undercapitalized following the distribution or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to a statute, regulation or agreement with the OTS. If an application is not required, the institution must still provide prior notice to the OTS of the capital distribution if, like First Federal, it is a subsidiary of a holding company. If First Federal’s capital were ever to fall below its regulatory requirements or the OTS notified it that it was in need of increased supervision, its ability to make capital distributions could be restricted. In addition, the OTS could prohibit a proposed capital distribution that would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the agency determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.

     Qualified Thrift Lender Test. Federal law requires savings associations to meet a qualified thrift lender test. Under the test, a savings association is required to either qualify as a “domestic building and loan association” under the Internal Revenue Code or maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” (total assets less: (i) specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets; (ii) intangibles, including goodwill; and (iii) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain “qualified thrift investments” (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed securities, but also defined to include education, credit card and small business loans) in at least nine months out of each twelve-month period. Legislation has expanded the extent to which education loans, credit card loans and small business loans may be considered “qualified thrift investments.”

     A savings association that fails the qualified thrift lender test is subject to certain operating restrictions and may be required to convert to a bank charter. As of December 31, 2007, First Federal maintained 83.55% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments and, therefore, met the qualified thrift lender test.

     Transactions with Related Parties. Federal law permits First Federal to make loans to, and engage in certain other transactions with (collectively, “covered transactions”), “affiliates” (i.e., generally, any company that controls or is under common control with an institution), including FedFirst Financial and FFMHC and their non-savings institution subsidiaries. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with any individual affiliate is limited to 10% of the capital and surplus of the savings institution. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with all affiliates is limited to 20% of the savings institution’s capital and surplus. Loans and other specified transactions with affiliates are required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type described in federal law. The purchase of low quality assets from affiliates is generally prohibited. Transactions with affiliates must be on terms and under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the institution as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated companies. In addition, savings institutions are prohibited from lending to any affiliate that is engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and no savings institution may purchase the securities of any affiliate other than a subsidiary.

     The Sarbanes-Oxley Act generally prohibits loans by FedFirst Financial to its executive officers and directors. However, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains a specific exemption from such prohibition for loans by First Federal to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking regulations. Federal regulations require that all loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors of insured institutions must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. First Federal is therefore prohibited from making any new loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors at different rates or terms than those offered to the general public. Notwithstanding this rule, federal regulations permit First Federal to make loans to executive officers and directors at reduced interest rates if the loan is made under a benefit program generally available to all other employees and does not give preference to any executive officer or director over any other employee.

     In addition, loans made to a director or executive officer in an amount that, when aggregated with the amount of all other loans to the person and his or her related interests, are in excess of the greater of $25,000 or 5% of First Federal’s capital and surplus, up to a maximum of $500,000, must be approved in advance by a majority of the disinterested members of the board of directors.

     Enforcement. The OTS has primary enforcement responsibility over federal savings institutions and has the authority to bring actions against the institution and all institution-affiliated parties, including

K-11

stockholders, and any attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful action likely to have an adverse effect on an insured institution. Formal enforcement action may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order to removal of officers and/or directors to institution of receivership, conservatorship or termination of deposit insurance. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and can amount to $25,000 per day, or even $1 million per day in especially egregious cases. The FDIC has authority to recommend to the Director of the OTS that enforcement action be taken with respect to a particular savings institution. If action is not taken by the Director, the FDIC has authority to take such action under certain circumstances. Federal law also establishes criminal penalties for certain violations.

     Assessments. Federal savings banks are required to pay assessments to the OTS to fund its operations. The general assessments, paid on a semi-annual basis, are based upon the savings institution’s total assets, including consolidated subsidiaries, financial condition and complexity of its portfolio. The OTS assessments paid by First Federal for the year ended December 31, 2007 totaled $78,000.

     Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Deposits of First Federal are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. The FDIC determines insurance premiums based on a number of factors, primarily the risk of loss that insured institutions pose to the Deposit Insurance Fund. Recent legislation eliminated the minimum 1.25% reserve ratio for the insurance funds, the mandatory assessments when the ratio fall below 1.25% and the prohibition on assessing the highest quality banks when the ratio is above 1.25%. The FDIC has the ability to adjust the new insurance fund’s reserve ratio between 1.15% and 1.5%, depending on projected losses, economic changes and assessment rates at the end of a calendar year. The FDIC has adopted regulations that set assessment rates that took effect at the beginning of 2007. The new assessment rates for most banks vary between five cents and seven cents for every $100 of deposits. A change in insurance premiums could have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of First Federal. We cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future. Assessment credits have been provided to institutions that paid high premiums in the past. As a result, First Federal will have credits to offset a portion of its premiums in 2008.

     Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC or the OTS. We do not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.

     In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are required to make payments on bonds issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation to recapitalize a predecessor deposit insurance fund.

     FHLB System. First Federal is a member of the FHLB System, which consists of twelve regional FHLBs. The FHLB provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. First Federal, as a member of the FHLB of Pittsburgh, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that FHLB. First Federal was in compliance with this requirement with an investment in FHLB stock at December 31, 2007 of $5.1 million. FHLB advances must be secured by specified types of collateral.

     The FHLBs are required to provide funds for the resolution of insolvent thrifts in the late 1980s and to contribute funds for affordable housing programs. These requirements could reduce the amount of dividends that the FHLBs pay to their members and could also result in the FHLBs imposing a higher rate of interest on advances to their members. If dividends were reduced, or interest on future FHLB advances increased, our net interest income would likely also be reduced.

     Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings institutions to maintain noninterest earning reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW) and regular checking accounts). The regulations generally provide that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net transaction accounts up to and including $43.9 million; a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $43.9 million. The first $9.3 million of otherwise reservable balances are exempted from the reserve requirements. The amounts are adjusted annually. First Federal complies with the foregoing requirements.

K-12

Holding Company Regulation

     General. FedFirst Financial and FFMHC are savings and loan holding companies within the meaning of federal law. As such, they are registered with the OTS and are subject to OTS regulations, examinations, supervision, reporting requirements and regulations concerning corporate governance and activities. In addition, the OTS has enforcement authority over FedFirst Financial and FFMHC and their non-savings association subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the OTS to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to First Federal.

     Restrictions Applicable to Mutual Holding Companies. According to federal law and OTS regulations, a mutual holding company, such as FFMHC, may generally engage in the following activities: (1) investing in the stock of a bank; (2) acquiring a mutual association through the merger of such association into a bank subsidiary of such holding company or an interim bank subsidiary of such holding company; (3) merging with or acquiring another holding company, one of whose subsidiaries is a bank; and (4) any activity approved by the Federal Reserve Board for a bank holding company or financial holding company or previously approved by the OTS for multiple savings and loan holding companies. In addition, mutual holding companies may engage in activities permitted for financial holding companies. Financial holding companies may engage in a broad array of financial service activities including insurance and securities.

     Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company, including a federal mutual holding company, from directly or indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings association, or its savings and loan holding company, without prior written approval of the OTS. Federal law also prohibits a savings and loan holding company from acquiring more than 5% of a company engaged in activities other than those authorized for savings and loan holding companies by federal law, or acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the FDIC. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings associations, the OTS must consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.

     The OTS is prohibited from approving any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings associations in more than one state, except: (1) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies, and (2) the acquisition of a savings association in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings association specifically permit such acquisitions. The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.

     Although FedFirst Financial and FFMHC are not currently subject to regulatory capital requirements or specific restrictions on the payment of dividends or other capital distributions, federal regulations do prescribe such restrictions on First Federal. First Federal must notify the OTS 30 days before declaring any dividend and comply with the additional restrictions described below. In addition, the financial impact of FedFirst Financial and FFMHC on First Federal is a matter that is evaluated by the OTS and the agency has authority to order cessation of activities or divestiture of subsidiaries deemed to pose a threat to the safety and soundness of First Federal.

     Stock Holding Company Subsidiary Regulation. The OTS has adopted regulations governing the two-tier mutual holding company form of organization and subsidiary stock holding companies that are controlled by mutual holding companies. FedFirst Financial is the stock holding company subsidiary of FFMHC. FedFirst Financial is permitted to engage in activities that are permitted for FFMHC subject to the same restrictions and conditions.

     Waivers of Dividends by FFMHC. OTS regulations require FFMHC to notify the agency if it proposes to waive receipt of dividends from FedFirst Financial. The OTS reviews dividend waiver notices on a case-by-case basis, and, in general, does not object to any such waiver if: (i) the waiver would not be detrimental to the safe and sound operation of the savings association; and (ii) the mutual holding company’s board of directors determines that such waiver is consistent with such directors’ fiduciary duties to the mutual holding company’s members.

     Conversion of FFMHC to Stock Form. OTS regulations permit FFMHC to convert from the mutual form of organization to the capital stock form of organization. There can be no assurance of when, if ever, a

K-13

conversion transaction will occur. In a conversion transaction, a new holding company would be formed as the successor to FedFirst Financial, FFMHC’s corporate existence would end, and certain depositors of First Federal would receive the right to subscribe for additional shares of the new holding company. In a conversion transaction, each share of common stock held by stockholders other than FFMHC would be automatically converted into a number of shares of common stock of the new holding company based on an exchange ratio determined at the time of conversion that ensures that stockholders other than FFMHC own the same percentage of common stock in the new holding company as they owned in FedFirst Financial immediately before such conversion. The total number of shares held by stockholders other than FFMHC after a conversion transaction would be increased by any purchases by such stockholders in the stock offering conducted as part of the conversion transaction.

     Acquisition of Control. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the OTS if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of a savings and loan holding company or savings association. An acquisition of “control” can occur upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the voting stock of a savings and loan holding company or savings institution or as otherwise defined by the OTS. Under the Change in Bank Control Act, the OTS has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Any company that so acquires control would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company.

FEDERAL AND STATE TAXATION

Federal Income Taxation

     General. We report our income on a fiscal year basis using the accrual method of accounting. The federal income tax laws apply to us in the same manner as to other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly our reserve for bad debts discussed below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to us. Our federal income tax returns have been either audited or closed under the statute of limitations through tax year 2003. For its 2007 year, First Federal’s maximum federal income tax rate was 34%.

     FedFirst Financial and First Federal have entered into a tax allocation agreement. Because FedFirst Financial owns 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of First Federal, FedFirst Financial and First Federal are members of an affiliated group within the meaning of Section 1504(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, of which group FedFirst Financial is the common parent corporation. As a result of this affiliation, First Federal may be included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return with FedFirst Financial and, if a decision to file a consolidated tax return is made, the parties agree to compensate each other for their individual share of the consolidated tax liability and/or any tax benefits provided by them in the filing of the consolidated federal income tax return.

     Bad Debt Reserves. For fiscal years beginning before June 30, 1996, thrift institutions that qualified under certain definitional tests and other conditions of the Internal Revenue Code were permitted to use certain favorable provisions to calculate their deductions from taxable income for annual additions to their bad debt reserve. A reserve could be established for bad debts on qualifying real property loans, generally secured by interests in real property improved or to be improved, under the percentage of taxable income method or the experience method. The reserve for nonqualifying loans was computed using the experience method. Federal legislation enacted in 1996 repealed the reserve method of accounting for bad debts and the percentage of taxable income method for tax years beginning after 1995 and requires savings institutions to recapture or take into income certain portions of their accumulated bad debt reserves. Approximately $2.0 million of our accumulated bad debt reserves would not be recaptured into taxable income unless First Federal makes a “non-dividend distribution” to FedFirst Financial as described below.

     Distributions. If First Federal makes “non-dividend distributions” to FedFirst Financial, the distributions will be considered to have been made from First Federal’s unrecaptured tax bad debt reserves, including the balance of its reserves as of December 31, 1987, to the extent of the “non-dividend distributions,” and then from First Federal’s supplemental reserve for losses on loans, to the extent of those reserves, and an amount

K-14

based on the amount distributed, but not more than the amount of those reserves, will be included in First Federal’s taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in excess of First Federal’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, distributions in redemption of stock, and distributions in partial or complete liquidation. Dividends paid out of First Federal’s current or accumulated earnings and profits will not be so included in First Federal’s taxable income.

     The amount of additional taxable income triggered by a non-dividend is an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. Therefore, if First Federal makes a non-dividend distribution to FedFirst Financial, approximately one and one-half times the amount of the distribution, not in excess of the amount of the reserves, would be includable in income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 34% federal corporate income tax rate. First Federal does not intend to pay dividends that would result in a recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserves.

State Taxation

     FedFirst Financial and its non-thrift Pennsylvania subsidiaries are subject to the Pennsylvania Corporation Net Income Tax and Capital Stock and Franchise Tax. The state Corporate Net Income Tax rate for fiscal years ended 2007, 2006, and 2005 was 9.99% and was imposed on FedFirst Financial’s and its non-thrift subsidiaries’ unconsolidated taxable income for federal purposes with certain adjustments. In general, the Capital Stock Tax is a property tax imposed at the rate of 0.389% of a corporation’s capital stock value, which is determined in accordance with a fixed formula.

     First Federal is taxed under the Pennsylvania Mutual Thrift Institutions Tax Act (the “MTIT”), as amended, to include thrift institutions having capital stock. Pursuant to the MTIT, First Federal’s tax rate is 11.5%. The MTIT exempts First Federal from all other taxes imposed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for state income tax purposes and from all local taxation imposed by political subdivisions, except taxes on real estate and real estate transfers. The MTIT is a tax upon net earnings, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles with certain adjustments. The MTIT, in computing income, allows for the exclusion of interest earned on Pennsylvania and federal securities, while disallowing a percentage of a thrift’s interest expense deduction in the proportion of interest income on those securities to the overall interest income of First Federal. Net operating losses, if any, thereafter can be carried forward three years for MTIT purposes. Neither FedFirst Financial nor First Federal have been audited by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the last five years.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in shares of our common stock involves various risks. Before deciding to invest in our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below in conjunction with the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and information incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed by any of the following risks or by other risks that have not been identified or that we may believe are immaterial or unlikely. The value or market price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements.

Our market area limits our growth potential.

     Our offices are located primarily in small industrial communities in the mid-Monongahela Valley, which is located in the southern suburban area of metropolitan Pittsburgh. Most of these communities have experienced population and economic decline as a result of the decline of the United States steel industry. Because we have an aging customer base and there is little new real estate development in the communities where our offices are located, the opportunities for originating loans and growing deposits in our primary

K-15

market area are limited. Prior to 2006, we experienced a decline in time deposits due primarily to the following factors: the shrinking population of our market area; many of our customers are retired and living off of their savings; lower rates have caused depositors to favor other products; and increased competition from credit unions in our market area. During 2006 and 2007, our deposits increased primarily as a result of an increase in short-term certificates of deposit and money market accounts related to the marketing of select specials in coordination with the opening our Peters Township branch in July 2006 and Washington branch in June 2007. We cannot assure you that our deposits and loan portfolio will not decline in the future. If we are unable to grow our business it will be difficult for us to increase our earnings.

Our expansion strategy may not be successful.

     A key component of our strategy to grow and improve profitability is to expand into communities that are experiencing population growth and economic expansion. In July 2006, we opened a new branch in Peters Township in Washington County. In June 2007, we opened a new branch located in the downtown area of Washington, Pennsylvania. We can provide no assurance that we will be successful in increasing the volume of our loans and deposits by expanding our branch network. Building and/or staffing new branch offices will increase our operating expenses. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to manage the costs and implementation risks associated with this strategy so that expansion of our branch network will be profitable.

Changes in interest rates may reduce our profits and asset value.

     Short-term market interest rates (which we use as a guide to price our deposits) have until recently risen from historically low levels, while longer-term market interest rates (which we use as a guide to price our longer-term loans) have not. This “flattening” of the market yield curve has had a negative impact on our interest rate spread and net interest margin, which has reduced our profitability. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, our interest rate spread was 1.85% compared to 1.88%. If short-term interest rates rise, and if rates on our deposits reprice upwards faster than the rates on our long-term loans and investments, we would experience compression of our interest rate spread and net interest margin, which would have a negative effect on our profitability. Recently, however, the U.S. Federal Reserve decreased its target for the federal funds rate from 5.25% to 3.00%. Decreases in interest rates can result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance to reduce their borrowing costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject to reinvestment risk as we may have to redeploy such loan or securities proceeds into lower-yielding assets, which might also negatively impact our income. For further discussion of how changes in interest rates could impact us, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risk Management—Interest Rate Risk Management.”

A downturn in the local economy or a decline in real estate values could reduce our profits.

     Most of our loans are secured by real estate in Fayette, Washington and Westmoreland Counties, Pennsylvania. As a result of this concentration, a downturn in the local economy could cause significant increases in nonperforming loans, which would reduce our profits. A decline in real estate values could also cause some of our mortgage and home equity loans to become inadequately collateralized, which would expose us to a greater risk of loss. In addition, decreases in asset quality could require additions to our allowance for loan losses through increased provisions for loan losses, which would further reduce our profits.

Strong competition within our market area could reduce our profits and slow growth.

     We face intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. This competition has made it more difficult for us to make new loans and at times has forced us to offer higher deposit rates. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in us earning less on our loans and paying more on our deposits, which would reduce net interest income. Competition also makes it more difficult to grow loans

K-16

and deposits. As of June 30, 2007, we held 0.26% of the deposits in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Some of the institutions with which we compete have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have and may offer services that we do not provide. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area.

A significant percentage of our assets are invested in lower yielding investments, which has contributed to our low profitability.

     Our results of operations are substantially dependent on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense paid on our interest-bearing liabilities. At December 31, 2007, 29.2% of our assets were invested in securities. These investments typically yield less than the loans we hold in our portfolio. In the future, we intend to invest a greater proportion of our assets in loans with the goal of increasing our net interest income. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to increase the origination or purchase of loans acceptable to us or that we will be able to successfully implement this strategy.

Our purchase of unseasoned, out-of-state loans may expose us to increased lending risks.

     Between 2002 and 2005, we purchased $95.4 million of newly originated residential and multi-family real estate loans. The purchased loans are secured by properties throughout the country. Rapid repayments, primarily as a result of the lower interest rate environment since the loans were originated, have reduced the aggregate outstanding principal amount of these loans to $45.8 million at December 31, 2007, which was 23.8% of our total loans. It is difficult to assess the future performance of this part of our loan portfolio due to the recent origination of these loans and because the properties securing these loans are located outside of our market area. We can give no assurance that these loans will not have delinquency or charge-off levels above our historical experience, which would adversely affect our future performance.

We operate in a highly regulated environment and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.

     We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the OTS, our chartering authority, and by the FDIC, as insurer of our deposits. FFMHC, FedFirst Financial and First Federal are all subject to regulation and supervision by the OTS. Such regulation and supervision governs the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage, and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and the depositors and borrowers of First Federal rather than for holders of FedFirst Financial common stock. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on our operations.

FFMHC’s majority control of our common stock will enable it to exercise voting control over most matters put to a vote of stockholders and will prevent stockholders from forcing a sale or a second-step conversion transaction you may find advantageous.

     FFMHC owns a majority of FedFirst Financial’s common stock and, through its Board of Directors, will be able to exercise voting control over most matters put to a vote of stockholders. The same directors and officers who manage FedFirst Financial and First Federal also manage FFMHC. As a federally chartered mutual holding company, the Board of Directors of FFMHC must ensure that the interests of depositors of First Federal are represented and considered in matters put to a vote of stockholders of FedFirst Financial. Therefore, the votes cast by FFMHC may not be in your personal best interest as a stockholder. For example, FFMHC may exercise its voting control to defeat a stockholder nominee for election to the Board of

K-17

Directors of FedFirst Financial. In addition, stockholders will not be able to force a merger or second-step conversion transaction without the consent of FFMHC. Some stockholders may desire a sale or merger transaction, since stockholders typically receive a premium for their shares, or a second-step conversion transaction, since fully converted institutions tend to trade at higher multiples than mutual holding companies.

OTS policy on remutualization transactions could prohibit acquisition of FedFirst Financial, which may adversely affect our stock price.

     Current OTS regulations permit a mutual holding company to be acquired by a mutual institution in a remutualization transaction. However, the OTS has issued a policy statement indicating that it views remutualization transactions as raising significant issues concerning disparate treatment of minority stockholders and mutual members of the target entity and raising issues concerning the effect on the mutual members of the acquiring entity. Under certain circumstances, the OTS intends to give these issues special scrutiny and reject applications providing for the remutualization of a mutual holding company unless the applicant can clearly demonstrate that the OTS’s concerns are not warranted in the particular case. Should the OTS prohibit or otherwise restrict these transactions in the future, our per share stock price may be adversely affected. In addition, OTS regulations prohibit, for three years following completion of our recent stock offering, the acquisition of more than 10% of any class of equity security issued by us without the prior approval of the OTS.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

     Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

     We conduct our business through our main office and branch offices. The following table sets forth certain information relating to these facilities at December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands).

					Date of			Net Book Value
	Year		Square		Lease		Owned /	at
Location	Opened		Footage		Expiration		Leased	December 31, 2007
First Federal Savings Bank:
Donner at Sixth Street Monessen, PA 15062		1970		11,430		N/A	Owned	$	186
557 Donner at Sixth Street Monessen, PA 15062 (1)		1980		6,625		N/A	Owned		19
235 West Main Street PO Box 141 Monongahela, PA 15063		1965		6,323		N/A	Owned		66
1670 Broad Avenue Belle Vernon, PA 15012		1974		5,048		N/A	Owned		226
545 West Main Street Uniontown, PA 15401 (2)		1975		4,160		N/A	Owned		148

K-18

					Date of			Net Book Value
	Year		Square		Lease		Owned /	at
Location	Opened		Footage		Expiration		Leased	December 31, 2007
Park Centre Plaza 1711 Grand Boulevard Monessen, PA 15062		1985		1,575		2/28/10	Leased		—
Meldon at Sixth Street PO Box 442 Donora, PA 15033		1980		2,609		N/A	Owned		226
101 Independence Street PO Box 625 Perryopolis, PA 15473		1986		1,992		N/A	Owned		28
3515 Washington Road McMurray, PA 15317		2006		2,535		2/28/11	Leased		—
95 West Beau Street Suite 130 Washington, PA 15301		2007		3,355		4/30/17	Leased		—
Exchange Underwriters:
121 West Pike Street Canonsburg, PA 15317		1982		3,500		5/31/12	Leased		—

(1)	Administrative offices.
(2)	The property is subject to a ground lease that expires in 2009.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits against us, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to our business. We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     None.

K-19

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market, Holder and Dividend Information

     The Company’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the trading symbol “FFCO.” The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the four quarters of 2007 and 2006, as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market.

	2007				2006
Quarter	High		Low		High		Low
First Quarter	$	9.70	$	8.64	$	10.09	$	8.76
Second Quarter		9.69		8.64		10.85		9.75
Third Quarter		9.30		8.66		10.67		9.95
Fourth Quarter		9.45		8.50		10.50		9.50

     FedFirst Financial has not declared or paid any dividends to date to its stockholders. FedFirst Financial’s ability to pay dividends is dependent on dividends received from First Federal. For a discussion of restrictions on the payment of cash dividends by First Federal, see “Business – Regulation and Supervision – Regulation of Federal Savings Associations – Limitation on Capital Distributions” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     As of March 11, 2008, there were approximately 199 holders of record of the Company’s common stock, excluding the number of persons or entities holding stock in street name through various brokerage firms.

Purchases of Equity Securities

     The Company made the following purchases of its common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2007.

					Total Number of
					Shares Purchased		Maximum Number
					as Part of the		of Shares that May
	Total Number		Average Price		Publicly		Yet Be Purchased
	of Shares		Paid per		Announced		Under the
Period	Purchased		Share		Programs(1)		Programs(1)
October 2007		53,100	$	9.22		53,100		126,700
November 2007		—		—		—		126,700
December 2007		17,500		9.17		17,500		109,200
Total		70,600		9.21		70,600

(1)

On March 28, 2007, the Company announced that the board of directors approved the repurchase of up to 153,500 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was approximately 5% of outstanding shares held by persons other than FFMHC on that date. This repurchase program was completed on October 5, 2007 with the purchase of 32,300 shares.

On September 27, 2007, the Company announced that the board of directors had approved a second program allowing the Company to repurchase up to 147,500 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was approximately 5% of outstanding shares held by persons other than FFMHC on that date. This repurchase program is scheduled to expire on March 31, 2008. 38,300 shares have been purchased under the second program at December 31, 2007.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

     Not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting company.

K-20

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

     The objective of this section is to help stockholders and potential investors understand our views on our results of operations and financial condition. You should read this discussion in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

     Income. Our primary source of pre-tax income is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments, and interest expense, which is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Other significant sources of pre-tax income are service charges (mostly from service charges on deposit accounts), commissions from the sale of insurance products and bank-owned life insurance. In some years we may also recognize income from the sale of securities.

     Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.

     Expenses. The noninterest expenses we incur in operating our business consist of compensation and employee benefits expenses, occupancy expenses which includes depreciation, FDIC insurance premiums, data processing expenses and other miscellaneous expenses.

     Compensation and employee benefits consist primarily of: salaries and wages paid to our employees; payroll taxes; and expenses for health insurance, retirement plans, equity compensation plans and other employee benefits.

     Occupancy expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of buildings and equipment, consist primarily of depreciation charges, lease expense, furniture and equipment expenses, maintenance, real estate taxes and costs of utilities.

     Federal insurance premiums are payments we make to the FDIC for insurance of our deposit accounts.

     Data processing expenses are the fees we pay to third parties for processing customer information, deposits and loans.

     Other expenses include advertising, professional services, stationary, printing, and supplies, telephone, postage, correspondent bank fees, and other miscellaneous operating expenses.

Critical Accounting Policies

     We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. We consider the following to be our critical accounting policies: allowance for loan losses, deferred income taxes and goodwill.

     Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged to income.

     Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing of future cash flows on impaired loans; value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change.

K-21

Management reviews the level of the allowance on a quarterly basis and establishes the provision for loan losses based upon an evaluation of the portfolio, past loss experience, current economic conditions and other factors related to the collectibility of the loan portfolio. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. In addition, the OTS, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to it at the time of its examination. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings. See Notes 1 and 3 of the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes as prescribed in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. If current available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments require us to make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets, which are inherently subjective, are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record an additional valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. An increase in the valuation allowance would result in additional income tax expense in the period, which would negatively affect earnings.

     Goodwill. In connection with our acquisition of Exchange Underwriters, we recorded $1.1 million of goodwill. As required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is no longer amortized but is subject, at a minimum, to annual tests for impairment. The SFAS No. 142 goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the book value of net assets to the fair value of the related operations that have goodwill assigned to them. If the fair value is determined to be less than book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. We estimate the fair values of the related operations using discounted cash flows. The forecasts of future cash flows are based on our best estimate of future revenues and operating costs, based primarily on contracts in effect, new accounts and cancellations and operating budgets. The impairment analysis requires management to make subjective judgments concerning how the acquired assets will perform in the future. Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include competitive forces, customer behaviors and attrition, changes in revenue growth trends, cost structures and industry and market trends. Changes in these forecasts could cause a reporting unit to either pass or fail the first step in the SFAS No. 142 goodwill impairment model, which could significantly change the amount of impairment recorded. Our quarterly assessment of potential goodwill impairment was completed in the fourth quarter of 2007. Based on the results of this assessment, no goodwill impairment was recognized.

Balance Sheet Analysis

     Loans. Our primary lending activity has been the origination of loans secured by real estate. We originate one-to-four family residential loans, commercial and multi-family real estate loans and construction loans. We also originate commercial business and consumer loans. In order to improve the mix and profitability of our loan portfolio, we have recently emphasized the origination of commercial real estate and business loans and home equity loans.

     Total loans increased $14.4 million or 8.1%, to $192.3 million at December 31, 2007 compared to $177.9 million at December 31, 2006.

K-22

     The largest segment of our loan portfolio is one-to-four family residential loans. These loans increased $1.6 million, or 1.2%, to $135.5 million and represented 70.4% of total loans at December 31, 2007, compared to $133.8 million, or 75.2% of total loans, at December 31, 2006.

     Commercial real estate loans increased $10.0 million to $15.4 million and represented 8.0% of total loans at December 31, 2007, compared to $5.4 million, or 3.1% of total loans, at December 31, 2006. The increase was the result of the Company’s strategic focus to grow its commercial loan portfolio by becoming a greater presence in the business community.

     Multi-family real estate loans decreased $7.4 million, or 40.0%, to $11.0 million and represented 5.7% of total loans at December 31, 2007, compared to $18.4 million, or 10.3% of total loans, at December 31, 2006. The decrease was the result of prepayments and pay-downs of purchased multi-family loans.

     Construction loans decreased $100,000, or 1.5%, to $6.7 million and represented 3.5% of total loans at December 31, 2007, compared to $6.8 million, or 3.8% of total loans, at December 31, 2006.

     We originate commercial business loans secured by business assets other than real estate, such as business equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. Commercial business loans increased $1.7 million, or 65.9%, to $4.3 million and represented 2.3% of total loans at December 31, 2007, compared to $2.6 million, or 1.5% of total loans, at December 31, 2006. This increase from the prior year represents the Company’s focus to develop business relationships and improve the mix and profitability of our loan portfolio.

     We also originate a variety of consumer loans, including home equity lines of credit, home equity installment loans, loans on savings accounts, and personal lines of credit. Consumer loans increased $8.5 million, or 78.5%, to $19.4 million and represented 10.1% of total loans at December 31, 2007, compared to $10.9 million, or 6.1% of total loans, at December 31, 2006. Home equity loans, which increased $8.4 million, or 88.6% to $17.9 million, accounted for the majority of the increase in consumer loans.

K-23

The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007						2006						2005						2004						2003
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
Real estate — mortgage:
One-to-four family residential	$	135,453			70.4	%	$	133,821			75.2	%	$	133,189			76.3	%	$	111,333			69.5	%	$	115,191			69.4	%
Multi-family		11,042			5.7			18,410			10.3			21,552			12.3			26,995			16.9			31,108			18.8
Commercial		15,426			8.0			5,437			3.1			4,121			2.4			5,401			3.4			2,799			1.7
Total real estate — mortgage		161,921			84.1			157,668			88.6			158,862			91.0			143,729			89.8			149,098			89.9
Real estate — construction:
Residential		6,671			3.5			5,021			2.8			4,366			2.5			5,584			3.5			2,436			1.5
Commercial		—			—			1,750			1.0			1,000			0.6			94			0.1			1,500			0.9
Total real estate — construction		6,671			3.5			6,771			3.8			5,366			3.1			5,678			3.6			3,936			2.4
Consumer:
Home equity		17,862			9.3			9,470			5.3			6,264			3.6			6,442			4.0			7,808			4.7
Loans on savings accounts		675			0.4			493			0.3			416			0.2			245			0.2			291			0.2
Home improvement		281			0.1			381			0.2			470			0.3			668			0.4			999			0.6
Other		592			0.3			531			0.3			1,955			1.1			2,303			1.4			2,674			1.6
Total consumer		19,410			10.1			10,875			6.1			9,105			5.2			9,658			6.0			11,772			7.1
Commercial business		4,341			2.3			2,616			1.5			1,271			0.7			948			0.6			971			0.6
Total loans		192,343			100.0	%		177,930			100.0	%		174,604			100.0	%		160,013			100.0	%		165,777			100.0	%
Premium on loans purchased		310						465						524						595						740
Net deferred loan costs		491						432						385						393						413
Discount on loans purchased		(119	)					(139	)					(166	)					(194	)					(218	)
Loans in process		(3,614	)					(3,104	)					(3,385	)					(3,374	)					(503	)
Allowance for losses		(1,457	)					(866	)					(800	)					(725	)					(725	)
Loans, net	$	187,954					$	174,718					$	171,162					$	156,708					$	165,484

K-24

     The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2007 regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing during the periods indicated. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments, which significantly shorten the average life of loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or less (dollars in thousands).

			Amounts due in
	One year or		One to		After five
	less		five years		years		Total
Real estate — mortgage	$	181	$	3,673	$	158,067	$	161,921
Real estate — construction		—		—		6,671		6,671
Consumer		1,253		1,235		16,922		19,410
Commercial business		1,012		2,905		424		4,341
Total	$	2,446	$	7,813	$	182,084	$	192,343

     The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans at December 31, 2007 that are due after December 31, 2008 and have either fixed interest rates or adjustable interest rates (dollars in thousands).

	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
Real estate — mortgage	$	140,845	$	20,895	$	161,740
Real estate — construction		6,671		—		6,671
Consumer		17,487		670		18,157
Commercial business		3,169		160		3,329
Total	$	168,172	$	21,725	$	189,897

     Our adjustable-rate mortgage loans generally do not provide for downward adjustments below the initial contract rate. This feature has prevented some loans from adjusting downwards in a declining interest rate environment. When market interest rates rise, the interest rates on these loans will not increase until the contract rate (the index plus the margin) exceeds the interest rate floor.

     Securities. Our securities portfolio consists primarily of Government-sponsored enterprise securities, mortgage-backed securities, guaranteed REMIC pass-through certificates, and corporate debt securities.

     REMICs (real estate mortgage investment conduits) represent a participation interest in a pool of mortgages. REMICs are created by redirecting the cash flows from the pool of mortgages underlying those securities to create two or more classes (or tranches) with different maturity or risk characteristics designed to meet a variety of investor needs and preferences. We believe that these securities represent attractive alternatives relative to other investments due to the wide variety of maturity, repayment and interest rate options available. REMICs may be sponsored by private issuers, such as money center banks or mortgage bankers, or by U.S. Government agencies and Government-sponsored enterprises. At December 31, 2007, we held privately issued REMICs with a carrying value of $27.5 million. The privately issued REMICs that we hold carry the highest credit rating offered by either Moody’s or Standard and Poor’s. We monitor the credit rating of our REMICs on a regular basis.

     Corporate debt securities generally have greater credit risk than Government-sponsored enterprises securities and generally have higher yields than government securities of similar duration. Therefore, we limit the amount of the portfolio based on these concerns. At December 31, 2007, we held corporate debt securities with a carrying value of $3.7 million.

     In April, 2007, the Company restructured its securities portfolio through the sale of approximately $40.5 million of securities which were yielding an average of 4.08%. Approximately $30.5 million of the proceeds from the sale of these securities were reinvested in securities yielding an average of 5.44% and the remaining $10.0 million was utilized to pay maturing short-term FHLB borrowings. The purpose was to better position the Company for an uncertain interest rate environment, improve interest rate spread and net interest margin

K-25

without increasing interest rate risk, and reduce leverage. The decision to sell the securities required the Company to reclassify the securities from available-for-sale to held for trading at March 31, 2007. As a result, at March 31, 2007, the Company held $41.1 million of securities held for trading, which consisted of $24.0 million of REMIC pass-through certificates, $14.2 million of Government-sponsored enterprise securities, and $2.9 million of mortgage backed securities. All of the securities in the trading portfolio were subsequently sold in April, 2007.

     Securities at amortized cost increased $4.9 million, or 5.9%, to $89.2 million. This increase was the result of $67.4 million in purchases, primarily of mortgage-backed securities and REMICs which were partially offset by sales of securities transferred to the trading portfolio and calls.

     The following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of the securities portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007				2006				2005
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Government-sponsored enterprises	$	22,321	$	22,674	$	30,475	$	30,036	$	15,425	$	14,896
Mortgage-backed		34,948		35,153		14,892		14,885		23,373		23,326
REMICs		27,875		27,477		34,831		34,121		36,737		35,702
Corporate debt		3,995		3,720		4,010		3,954		4,024		3,948
Other debt securities		—		—		—		—		26		26
Equities		49		49		49		49		49		49
Total securities available-for-sale	$	89,188	$	89,073	$	84,257	$	83,045	$	79,634	$	77,947

     At December 31, 2007, we had no investments in a single company or entity (other than with Government-sponsored enterprises) that had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity.

K-26

     The following table sets forth the stated maturities and weighted average yields of our mortgage-backed and debt securities at December 31, 2007. Certain mortgage-backed securities have adjustable interest rates and will reprice periodically within the various maturity ranges. These repricing schedules are not reflected in the table below. At December 31, 2007, mortgage-backed securities and REMICs with adjustable rates totaled $10.8 million (dollars in thousands).

	Amounts due in
	One year or less					One year to five years					Five years to ten years					After ten years					Total
			Weighted					Weighted					Weighted					Weighted					Weighted
	Carrying		Average			Carrying		Average			Carrying		Average			Carrying		Average			Carrying		Average
	Value		Yield			Value		Yield			Value		Yield			Value		Yield			Value		Yield
Government-sponsored enterprises	$	—		—	%	$	1,012		5.50	%	$	13,739		5.65	%	$	7,923		6.05	%	$	22,674		5.78	%
Mortgage-backed		—		—			11		9.25			287		5.84			34,855		5.78			35,153		5.78
REMICs		69		5.16			2,181		5.20			3,472		5.17			21,755		5.77			27,477		5.65
Corporate debt		—		—			—		—			—		—			3,720		5.07			3,720		5.07
Total available-for-sale debt securities	$	69		5.16	%	$	3,204		5.31	%	$	17,498		5.56	%	$	68,253		5.77	%	$	89,024		5.71	%
Equity securities																						49
Total securities available-for-sale																					$	89,073

K-27

     Deposits. Our deposit base is comprised of demand deposits, savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposits. We consider demand deposits, savings accounts and money market accounts to be core deposits. Total deposits increased $12.1 million, or 8.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2007, as certificates of deposit increased $6.7 million, or 7.3%, and core deposits increased $5.4 million, or 10.3%. During the year we experienced growth from short-term certificates of deposit and money market accounts and noninterest bearing accounts. The increase in short-term certificates and money market accounts was due to the marketing of select interest rate specials. The increase has provided an opportunity for funding loan originations and security purchases. The increase was partially offset by decreases in long-term certificates of deposit, savings account and interest-bearing demand deposits as customer shifted their funds to higher interest earning products. Our focus remains on building and fostering relationships with current customers and attracting new customers.

     The following table sets forth the balances of our deposit products at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

	2007					2006					2005
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	8,918		5.7	%	$	5,409		3.8	%	$	3,181		2.5	%
Interest-bearing demand deposits		11,864		7.6			12,530		8.7			13,225		10.6
Savings accounts		23,056		14.8			26,525		18.5			30,797		24.7
Money market accounts		13,676		8.8			7,663		5.3			5,319		4.3
Certificates of deposit		98,044		63.1			91,368		63.7			72,375		57.9
Total deposits	$	155,558		100.0	%	$	143,495		100.0	%	$	124,897		100.0	%

     The following table indicates the amount of jumbo certificates of deposit by time remaining until maturity at December 31, 2007. Jumbo certificates of deposit require minimum deposits of $100,000 (dollars in thousands).

	Certificates
Maturity Period	of Deposit
Three months or less	$	4,293
Over three through six months		6,538
Over six through twelve months		2,615
Over twelve months		5,097
Total jumbo certificates	$	18,543

     The following table sets forth certificates of deposit classified by rates at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007		2006		2005
1.01 - 2.00%	$	—	$	5	$	3,156
2.01 - 3.00%		4,415		9,944		21,672
3.01 - 4.00%		16,024		20,008		16,452
4.01 - 5.00%		51,507		31,152		17,278
5.01 - 6.00%		23,177		24,068		7,001
6.01 - 7.00%		2,921		6,191		6,816
Total certificates of deposits	$	98,044	$	91,368	$	72,375

K-28

     The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of certificates of deposit at December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands).

Amounts due in
	One year		One to		Two to		Three to		After				Percent of
	or less		two years		three years		four years		four years		Total		total
2.01 - 3.00%	$	4,415	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,415		4.5	%
3.01 - 4.00%		9,971		3,418		1,770		156		709		16,024		16.3
4.01 - 5.00%		34,826		5,210		1,176		1,320		8,975		51,507		52.6
5.01 - 6.00%		18,588		2,401		539		1,064		585		23,177		23.6
6.01 - 7.00%		344		—		1,738		839		—		2,921		3.0
Total	$	68,144	$	11,029	$	5,223	$	3,379	$	10,269	$	98,044		100.0	%

     The following table sets forth deposit activity for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands).

Years Ended December 31,	2007		2006		2005
Beginning balance	$	143,495	$	124,897	$	137,389
Increase (decrease) before interest credited		6,801		15,105		(15,610	)
Interest credited		5,262		3,493		3,118
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		12,063		18,598		(12,492	)
Deposits at end of year	$	155,558	$	143,495	$	124,897

     Borrowings. We utilize borrowings from the FHLB of Pittsburgh and, to a limited extent, repurchase agreements to supplement our funding for loans and securities (dollars in thousands).

Years Ended December 31,	2007			2006			2005
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end during the year	$	101,074		$	98,766		$	109,800
Average amounts outstanding during the year		82,880			90,308			105,275
Weighted average rate during the year		4.32	%		4.04	%		3.72	%
Balance outstanding at end of year	$	101,074		$	89,323		$	102,404
Weighted average rate at end of year		4.30	%		4.22	%		3.87	%

     Borrowings increased $11.8 million, or 13.2%, in the year ended December 31, 2007. These advances mature in 2008 through 2014. The weighted average interest rate at the end of the year increased compared to the prior year end due to the replacement of maturing advances throughout the year with higher cost advances.

     Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity decreased $2.6 million, or 5.6%, to $43.8 million at December 31, 2007 primarily as a result of net loss for the year and the repurchase of common stock, partially offset by a net change of $667,000 due to the transfer of securities into held for trading and the unrealized loss position of the security portfolio, the impact of compensation expense related to the Equity Incentive Plan, and the release of shares from the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”).

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

     Overview.

K-29

(Dollars in thousands)	2007			2006
Net (loss) income	$	(1,955	)	$	344
Return on average assets		(0.68)	%		0.13	%
Return on average equity		(4.30	)		0.75
Average equity to average assets		15.93			16.75

     The Company had a net loss of $2.0 million for 2007, compared to net income of $344,000 for 2006. The net loss for 2007 was primarily due to the recognition of a $1.4 million loss from the restructuring of the securities portfolio in April 2007 as well as a provision for loan losses of $1.1 million.

     Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $292,000, or 4.7%, to $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our net interest spread and net interest margin were 1.85% and 2.43%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to 1.88% and 2.39%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2006.

     Total interest income increased $1.4 million, or 10.0%, to $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Interest income on loans increased $531,000, due to the increase in average volume of $7.6 million, of which home equity and commercial real estate were the primary contributors. Interest income on securities increased $765,000, or 22.4%. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the average yield of 96 basis points related to the securities restrucuring in April 2007. Other interest-earning assets income increased $86,000 or 19.4% primarily as a result of an increase of 62 basis points in the average yield and a 6.1% increase in the average balance. The key components that comprise other interest-earning assets are the FHLB Stock and our FHLB demand account.

     Total interest expense increased $1.1 million, or 14.2%, to $8.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Interest expense on deposits increased $1.2 million, or 28.8%, as a result of an increase in the average balance of $14.6 million and a 49 basis point increase in the average cost related to the marketing of selected specials on short-term certificates of deposit and money market accounts. The increases in average volume and cost of deposits is directly related to the focus on building customer relationships as well as a competitive market. Interest expense on borrowings decreased $66,000. The average borrowings balance decreased $7.4 million due to the Company paying off approximately $10.0 million in short-term borrowings as part of the securities restructuring in April 2007. The decrease in the average balance was partially offset by an increase in average cost of 28 basis points.

K-30

     Average Balances and Yields. The following table presents information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, the total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends from average interest-earning assets, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented (dollars in thousands).

	2007							2006
			Interest							Interest
	Average		and		Yield/			Average		and		Yield/
Years Ended December 31,	Balance		Dividends		Cost			Balance		Dividends		Cost
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, net (1)(2)	$	180,781	$	10,535		5.83	%	$	173,179	$	10,004		5.78	%
Securities (3)		77,593		4,186		5.39			77,294		3,421		4.43
Other interest-earning assets		9,534		530		5.56			8,986		444		4.94
Total interest-earning assets		267,908	$	15,251		5.69			259,459	$	13,869		5.35
Noninterest-earning assets		17,659							15,472
Total assets	$	285,567						$	274,931
Liabilities and Stockholders’ equity:
Interest-bearing liablities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	12,855	$	61		0.47	%	$	13,040	$	62		0.48	%
Savings accounts		24,887		250		1.00			28,791		289		1.00
Money market accounts		11,717		464		3.96			5,242		107		2.04
Certificates of deposit		95,856		4,399		4.59			83,621		3,560		4.26
Total interest-bearing deposits		145,315		5,174		3.56			130,694		4,018		3.07
Borrowings		82,880		3,579		4.32			90,308		3,645		4.04
Total interest-bearing liabilities		228,195		8,753		3.84			221,002		7,663		3.47
Noninterest-bearing liabilities		11,881							7,882
Total liabilities		240,076							228,884
Stockholders’ equity		45,491							46,047
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	285,567						$	274,931
Net interest income			$	6,498						$	6,206
Interest rate spread (4)						1.85	%						1.88	%
Net interest margin (5)						2.43							2.39
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liablities						117.40	%						117.40	%

(1)	Amount is net of deferred loan costs, loans in process, and estimated allowance for loan losses.
(2)	Amount includes nonaccrual loans in average balances only.
(3)	Amount does not include effect of unrealized (loss) gain on securities available-for-sale.
(4)	Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)	Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

K-31

     Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income (dollars in thousands). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The total column represents the sum of change. Changes related to volume/rate are prorated into volume and rate components.

	2007 Compared to 2006
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume			Rate			Total
Interest and dividend income:
Loans, net	$	443		$	88		$	531
Securities		20			745			765
Other interest-earning assets		28			58			86
Total interest-earning assets		491			891			1,382
Interest expense:
Deposits		479			677			1,156
Borrowings		(309	)		243			(66	)
Total interest-bearing liablities		170			920			1,090
Change in net interest income	$	321		$	(29	)	$	292

     Provision for Loan Losses. The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands).

Years Ended December 31,	2007			2006
Allowance at beginning of year	$	866		$	800
Provision for loan losses		1,119			84
Charge-offs		(528	)		(18	)
Recoveries		—			—
Net charge-offs		(528	)		(18	)
Allowance at end of year	$	1,457		$	866

     Provisions for loan losses were $1.1 million for 2007 compared to $84,000 for 2006. We had net charge-offs of $528,000 in 2007 compared to $18,000 in 2006. The provision in 2007 was based on the recognition of higher charge-offs, increased delinquencies, current economic conditions in the housing and credit markets, and the changes in the composition of and increase in the loan portfolio.

     An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses is presented under “Risk Management—Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses.”

K-32

     Noninterest Income. The following table summarizes noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands).

						Percent
Years Ended December 31,	2007			2006		Change
Fees and service charges	$	412		$	361		14.1	%
Insurance commissions		1,639			1,527		7.3
Income from bank-owned life insurance		279			275		1.5
Net loss on sales of securities		(1,412	)		—		N/M
Net gain on sale of real estate owned		—			33		(100.0	)
Other		15			44		(65.9	)
Total noninterest income	$	933		$	2,240		(58.3	)%

     Noninterest income decreased $1.3 million, or 58.3%, due to the $1.4 million loss recorded as a result of the securities restructuring completed in April 2007.

     Noninterest Expense. The following table summarizes noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands).

					Percent
Years Ended December 31,	2007		2006		Change
Compensation and employee benefits	$	5,656	$	4,782		18.3	%
Occupancy		1,156		838		37.9
FDIC insurance premiums		22		42		(47.6	)
Data processing		387		321		20.6
Advertising		155		147		5.4
Professional services		578		461		25.4
Stationary, printing and supplies		132		146		(9.6	)
Telephone		57		50		14.0
Postage		124		114		8.8
Correspondent bank fees		128		102		25.5
All other		719		627		14.7
Total noninterest expense	$	9,114	$	7,630		19.4	%

     Noninterest expense increased $1.5 million or 19.4%. Compensation and employee benefit costs increased $874,000 from the prior year. In the current period, the Company incurred a full period of stock compensation expense related to awards and options granted in August 2006 and recorded expense due to a severance agreement with a former employee. The Company has also hired key personnel to complement existing staff and strengthen our retail operations and sales force in connection with the openings of the Peters Township office in July 2006 and the Washington office in June 2007. Occupancy costs have increased $318,000 as a result of these new office openings.

     Other significant changes in noninterest expense are as follows: Professional service fees increased $117,000 compared to the prior year. In the current period, we recognized a full period of expense related to the outsourcing of the internal audit function and incurred increased fees associated with ensuring compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Data processing, advertising, telephone, and postage increased as compared to the prior year due to a focus on deposit and loan growth and costs associated with the opening of our new Peter’s Township branch in July 2006 and our Washington branch in June 2007. Correspondent bank fees increased due to increased transactional activity fees and outsourcing deposit statement rendering.

     Income Taxes. In 2007, we had an income tax benefit of $899,000, compared to income tax expense of $337,000 in 2006. The decrease in tax expense was due to a decrease in pre-tax and taxable income. For more information, see Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

K-33

Risk Management

     Overview. Managing risk is an essential part of successfully managing a financial institution. Our most prominent risk exposures are credit risk, interest rate risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Other risks that we face are operational risks, liquidity risks and reputation risk. Operational risks include risks related to fraud, regulatory compliance, processing errors, technology and disaster recovery. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, lenders or borrowers. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could cause a decline in our customer base or revenue.

     Credit Risk Management. Our strategy for credit risk management focuses on having well-defined credit policies and uniform underwriting criteria and providing prompt attention to potential problem loans.

     When a borrower fails to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status. When the loan becomes 15 days past due a past due notice is generated and sent to the borrower. If the payment is not received within five days, a second past due notice is sent. If payment is not then received by the 30th day of delinquency, additional letters and phone calls generally are made. Generally, when a mortgage loan becomes 60 days past due, we send a letter notifying the borrower that he or she may apply for assistance under a state mortgage assistance program. If the borrower does not apply for assistance within the allotted time period or applies for assistance and is rejected, we will commence foreclosure proceedings. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full, or refinanced before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the loan generally is sold at foreclosure. Generally, when a consumer loan becomes 60 days past due, we institute collection proceedings and attempt to repossess any personal property that secures the loan. We may consider loan workout arrangements with certain borrowers under certain circumstances.

     Management informs the Board of Directors monthly of the amount of loans delinquent more than 30 days, all loans in foreclosure and all foreclosed and repossessed property that we own.

     Analysis of Nonperforming and Classified Assets. We consider repossessed assets and loans that are 90 days or more past due to be nonperforming assets. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days delinquent at which time the accrual of interest ceases and all previously accrued and unpaid interest is reversed against earnings.

     Real estate that we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until it is sold. When property is acquired it is recorded at the lower of its cost, which is the unpaid balance of the loan plus foreclosure costs, or fair market value at the date of foreclosure. Holding costs and declines in fair value after acquisition of the property result in charges against income.

K-34

     The following table provides information with respect to our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
Nonaccrual loans:
Real estate — mortgage	$	1,264		$	592		$	212		$	276		$	353
Real estate — construction		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		17			175			43			29			25
Commercial business		—			—			—			—			70
Total		1,281			767			255			305			448
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
Real estate — mortgage		—			—			12			2			79
Real estate — construction		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		—			—			4			31			82
Commercial business		—			—			—			—			21
Total		—			—			16			33			182
Total of nonaccrual and 90 days or more past due loans		1,281			767			271			338			630
Real estate owned		1,119			569			21			—			—
Total nonperforming assets		2,400			1,336			292			338			630
Troubled debt restructurings		—			—			—			—			—
Troubled debt restructurings and total nonperforming assets	$	2,400		$	1,336		$	292		$	338		$	630
Total nonperforming loans to total loans		0.67	%		0.43	%		0.16	%		0.21	%		0.38	%
Total nonperforming loans to total assets		0.42			0.27			0.10			0.13			0.19
Total nonperforming assets to total assets		0.79			0.47			0.11			0.13			0.19

     Interest income that would have been recorded for the years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 had nonaccruing loans been current according to their original terms amounted to $74,000 and $64,000, respectively. No interest related to nonaccrual loans was included in interest income for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

     Federal regulations require us to review and classify our assets on a regular basis. In addition, the OTS has the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard” assets must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Doubtful” assets have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. The regulations also provide for a “special mention” category, described as assets which do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention. When we classify an asset as substandard or doubtful we establish a general valuation allowance for loan losses. If we classify an asset as loss, we charge-off an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss.

K-35

     The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our classified assets at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007		2006		2005
Special mention assets	$	1,061	$	319	$	1,845
Substandard assets		2,630		1,563		253
Doubtful assets		—		—		—
Loss assets		—		—		—
Total classified assets	$	3,691	$	1,882	$	2,098

     Delinquencies. The following table provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

	2007				2006				2005
	30-59		60-89		30-59		60-89		30-59		60-89
	Days		Days		Days		Days		Days		Days
December 31,	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due
Real estate — mortgage	$	1,143	$	645	$	91	$	420	$	289	$	387
Real estate — construction		—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer		71		6		741		—		80		18
Commercial business		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total delinquencies	$	1,214	$	651	$	832	$	420	$	369	$	405

     Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.

     Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of: (1) a general valuation allowance on identified problem loans; and (2) a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. Although we determine the amount of each element of the allowance separately, the entire allowance for loan losses is available for the entire portfolio.

     General Valuation Allowance on Identified Problem Loans. We establish a general allowance for classified loans and delinquent loans. We segregate these loans by loan category and assign allowance percentages to each category based on inherent losses associated with each type of lending and consideration that these loans, in the aggregate, represent an above-average credit risk and that more of these loans will prove to be uncollectible compared to loans in the general portfolio.

     General Valuation Allowance on the Remainder of the Loan Portfolio. We establish another general allowance for loans that are not classified or delinquent to recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category and assigning allowance percentages to each category. The allowance percentages have been derived using percentages commonly applied under the regulatory framework for First Federal and similarly sized institutions. The percentages are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated periodically to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment.

     In addition, we retain a general loan loss allowance that has not been allocated to particular problem assets or loan categories, other than the broad categories of mortgage loans and non-mortgage loans. This unallocated portion of our allowance is determined based on management’s evaluation of the collectibility of

K-36

the portfolio as of the evaluation date. The significant factors considered by management in determining the unallocated portion of the allowance are changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results.

     We identify loans that may need to be charged-off as a loss by reviewing all delinquent loans, classified loans and other loans that management may have concerns about collectibility. For individually reviewed loans, the borrower’s inability to make payments under the terms of the loan or a shortfall in collateral value would result in our charging off the loan or the portion of the loan that was impaired.

     The OTS, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. The OTS may require us to make additional provisions for loan losses based on judgments different from ours.

     At December 31, 2007, our allowance for loan losses represented 0.76% of total loans and 113.74% of nonperforming loans. The allowance for loan losses increased at December 31, 2007 from December 31, 2006 due to the recognition of higher charge-offs, increased delinquencies, current economic conditions in the housing and credit markets, and the changes in the composition of and increase in the loan portfolio.

K-37

     The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

	2007					2006					2005					2004					2003
			Percent of					Percent of					Percent of					Percent of					Percent of
			Total					Total					Total					Total					Total
December 31,	Amount		Loans(1)			Amount		Loans(1)			Amount		Loans(1)			Amount		Loans(1)			Amount		Loans(1)
Real estate — mortgage	$	868		84.1	%	$	503		88.6	%	$	452		91.0	%	$	440		89.8	%	$	319		89.9	%
Real estate — construction		16		3.5			22		3.8			10		3.1			8		3.6			10		2.4
Consumer		170		10.1			146		6.1			71		5.2			82		6.0			77		7.1
Commercial business		95		2.3			74		1.5			32		0.7			33		0.6			25		0.6
Unallocated		308		—			121		—			235		—			162		—			294		—
Total allowance for loan losses	$	1,457		100.0	%	$	866		100.0	%	$	800		100.0	%	$	725		100.0	%	$	725		100.0	%

(1) Represents percentage of loans in each category to total loans.

K-38

     Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and our results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not request us to increase our allowance for loan losses. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

     Analysis of Loan Loss Experience. The following table sets forth an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands).

Years Ended December 31,	2007			2006			2005			2004			2003
Allowance at beginning of year	$	866		$	800		$	725		$	725		$	525
Provision for loan losses		1,119			84			85			144			242
Charge-offs:
Real estate — mortgage		(355	)		(18	)		(10	)		—			(32	)
Real estate — construction		—			—			—			—			—
Consumer		(173	)		—			—			(15	)		(10	)
Commercial business		—			—			—			(129	)		—
Total charge-offs		(528	)		(18	)		(10	)		(144	)		(42	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—
Net charge-offs		(528	)		(18	)		(10	)		(144	)		(42	)
Allowance at end of year	$	1,457		$	866		$	800		$	725		$	725
Allowance to nonperforming loans		113.74	%		112.91	%		295.20	%		214.50	%		115.08	%
Allowance to total loans		0.76			0.49			0.46			0.45			0.44
Net charge-offs to average loans during the year		0.29			0.01			0.01			0.09			0.03

     Interest Rate Risk Management. We manage the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets in an effort to minimize the adverse effects of changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market interest rates than mortgage loans because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result, sharp increases in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect our earnings. We currently do not participate in hedging programs, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of derivative financial instruments.

     We have an Asset/Liability Committee, which includes members of executive management, to communicate, coordinate and control all aspects involving asset/liability management. The committee establishes and monitors the volume, maturities, pricing and mix of assets and funding sources with the objective of managing assets and funding sources to provide results that are consistent with liquidity, growth, risk limits and profitability goals.

     We use an interest rate sensitivity analysis prepared by the OTS to review our level of interest rate risk. This analysis measures interest rate risk by computing changes in net portfolio value of our cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. Net portfolio value represents the market value of portfolio equity and is equal to the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with adjustments made for off-balance sheet items. This analysis assesses the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained 50 to 300

K-39

basis point increase or 50 to 200 basis point decrease in market interest rates with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement. Because of the low level of market interest rates, this analysis is not performed for decreases of more than 200 basis points. We measure interest rate risk by modeling the changes in net portfolio value over a variety of interest rate scenarios. The following table, which is based on information that we provide to the OTS, presents the change in our net portfolio value at December 31, 2007 that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates based on OTS assumptions, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counteract that change (dollars in thousands).

									NPV as a Percent of
December 31, 2007	Net Portfolio Value (“NPV”)								Portfolio Value of Assets
Basis Point (“bp”)	Dollar		Dollar			Percent
Change in Rates	Amount		Change			Change			NPV Ratio			Change
300 bp	$	16,516	$	(19,808	)		(54.5	)%		5.81	%	(587		) bp
200		23,610		(12,714	)		(35.0	)		8.04			(364	)
100		30,858		(5,466	)		(15.0	)		10.17			(151	)
50		33,661		(2,663	)		(7.3	)		10.96			(72	)
Static		36,324		—			—			11.68			—
(50)		37,385		1,061			2.9			11.93			25
(100)		38,964		2,640			7.3			12.33			65
(200)		40,038		3,714			10.2			12.53			85

     The OTS uses certain assumptions in assessing the interest rate risk of savings associations. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others. As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table.

     Liquidity Management. Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities and borrowings from the FHLB of Pittsburgh. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

     We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management policy.

     Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits. The levels of these assets depend on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 2007, cash and cash equivalents totaled $5.6 million. Securities classified as available-for-sale whose market value exceeds cost, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $60.8 million at December 31, 2007. In addition, at December 31, 2007, we had the ability to borrow a total of approximately $181.1 million from the FHLB of Pittsburgh. On December 31, 2007, we had $95.6 million of FHLB advances outstanding.

K-40

     At December 31, 2007, we had $9.8 million of commitments to lend, which was comprised of $3.6 million of loans in process, $2.6 million of mortgage loan commitments, $235,000 of home equity loan commitments, a $273,000 commercial loan commitment, $2.2 million of unused home equity lines of credit and $802,000 of unused commercial lines of credit. Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2007 totaled $68.1 million, or 69.5% of certificates of deposit. The large percentage of certificates of deposit that mature within one year reflects customers’ hesitancy to invest their funds for long periods in the recent interest rate environment. If these maturing deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds including other certificates of deposit and borrowings. We believe, however, based on past experience, that a significant portion of our maturing certificates of deposit will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.

     The following table presents certain of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands).

	Amounts due in
			One year		One to		Three to		After
	Total		or less		three years		five years		five years
Long-term debt obligations (1)	$	101,074	$	28,856	$	42,469	$	23,736	$	6,013
Operating lease obligations (2)		1,107		185		339		205		378
Total	$	102,181	$	29,041	$	42,808	$	23,941	$	6,391

(1)	Borrowings.
(2)	Payments are for lease of real property.

     Our primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase of securities. Our primary financing activities consist of activity in deposit accounts and FHLB advances. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors. We generally manage the pricing of our deposits to be competitive and to increase core deposit relationships. Occasionally, we offer promotional rates on certain deposit products to attract deposits. No further changes in our funding mix are currently planned or expected, other than changes in the ordinary course of business resulting from deposit flows. For information about our costs of funds, see “Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006—Net Interest Income.”

     The following table presents our primary investing and financing activities during the periods indicated (dollars in thousands).

Years Ended December 31,	2007			2006
Investing activities:
Loans disbursed or closed	$	(37,574	)	$	(25,103	)
Loan principal repayments		22,524			19,976
Proceeds from maturities and principal repayments of securities		16,045			14,352
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale		4,569			—
Purchases of securities		(67,370	)		(19,146	)
Financing activities:
Increase in deposits		12,063			18,598
Increase (decrease) in borrowings		11,751			(13,081	)

     Capital Management. We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the OTS, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At December 31, 2007, we exceeded all of our regulatory capital requirements. We are considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines.

K-41

     Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit. For information about our loan commitments and unused lines of credit, see Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     For the year ended December 31, 2007, we engaged in no off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices

     The Consolidated Financial Statements and related financial data presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than do general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.”

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

     Information required by this item is included herein beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

     None.

ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     FedFirst Financial’s management, including FedFirst Financial’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of FedFirst Financial’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of

K-42

1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, FedFirst Financial’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

     Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting is incorporated by reference to FedFirst Financial’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     There have been no changes in FedFirst Financial’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, FedFirst Financial’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

     None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

     The information relating to the directors and officers of FedFirst Financial and information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference to FedFirst Financial’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and to Part I, Item 1, “Business – Executive Officers of the Registrant” to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     FedFirst Financial has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct which is available on our website of www.firstfederal-savings.com.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     The information regarding executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference to FedFirst Financial’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

(a)	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
	Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Stock Ownership” in FedFirst Financial’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
(b)	Security Ownership of Management
	Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Stock Ownership” in FedFirst Financial’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

K-43

(c)	Changes in Control
	Management of FedFirst Financial knows of no arrangements, including any pledge by any person or securities of FedFirst Financial’s, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the registrant.
(d)	Equity Compensation Plan Information
	The following table provides information at December 31, 2007 for compensation plans under which equity securities may be issued.

					Number of securities
					remaining available for
	Number of securities				future issuance under
	to be issued upon		Weighted-average		equity compensation
	exercise of		exercise price of		plans (excluding
	outstanding options		outstanding options		securities reflected
Plan Category	warrants and rights		warrants and rights		in column (A))
	(A)		(B)		(C)
Equity compensation plans:
Approved by stockholders		239,500	$	10.05		84,512
Not approved by stockholders		—		—		—
Total		239,500	$	10.05		84,512

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

     The information relating to certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated herein by reference to FedFirst Financial’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

     The information relating to the principal accountant fees and expenses is incorporated herein by reference to FedFirst Financial’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(1)	The financial statements required in response to this item are incorporated by reference from Item 8 of this report.
(2)	Exhibits

3.1	Amended and Restated Charter of FedFirst Financial Corporation (1)
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of FedFirst Financial Corporation (2)
4.0	Specimen Stock Certificate of FedFirst Financial Corporation (1)
10.1	Form of First Federal Savings Bank Employee Severance Compensation Plan (1)(3)

K-44

10.2	Director Fee Continuation Agreements by and between First Federal Savings Bank and certain Directors (1)(3)
10.3	Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreements by and between First Federal Savings Bank and certain officers (1)(3)
10.4	Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Agreement by and between First Federal Savings Bank and Richard B. Boyer (1)(3)
10.5	Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreements by and between First Federal Savings Bank and certain Directors (1)(3)
10.6	Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreements by and between First Federal Savings Bank and certain officers (1)(3)
10.7	Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement by and between First Federal Savings Bank and Richard B. Boyer (1)(3)
10.8	Employment Agreement dated as of October 11, 2005 by and between First Federal Savings Bank, FedFirst Financial Corporation and John G. Robinson (3)(4)
10.9	Employment Agreement dated as of October 11, 2005 by and between First Federal Savings Bank, FedFirst Financial Corporation and Patrick G. O’Brien (3)(4)
10.10	Consulting Agreement between First Federal Savings Bank and Peter D. Griffith (3)(4)
10.11	Employment Agreement between First Federal Savings Bank and Richard B. Boyer (1)(3)
10.12	Employment Agreement between Exchange Underwriters, Inc. and Richard B. Boyer (1)(3)
10.13	Lease Agreement between Exchange Underwriters, Inc. and Richard B. and Wendy A. Boyer (1)
10.14	Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2006 by and between First Federal Savings Bank, FedFirst Financial Corporation and Robert C. Barry, Jr. (3)(5)
10.15	FedFirst Financial Corporation 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (3)(6)
10.16	Amendment, effective September 19, 2006, to the Employment Agreement dated as of October 11, 2005 by and between First Federal Savings Bank, FedFirst Financial Corporation and John G. Robinson (3)(7)
10.17	Amendment, effective September 19, 2006, to the Employment Agreement dated as of October 11, 2005 by and between First Federal Savings Bank, FedFirst Financial Corporation and Patrick G. O’Brien (3)(7)
21.0	Subsidiaries of the Registrant (1)
23.0	Consent of Beard Miller Company, LLP
31.1	Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer
32.0	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

(1)	Incorporated herein by reference to the Exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2, and amendments thereto, initially filed on December 17, 2004, Registration No. 333-121405.
(2)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to FedFirst Financial Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 26, 2007.
(3)	Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.
(4)	Incorporated herein by reference to the Exhibits to FedFirst Financial Corporation’s Form 10-QSB filed on November 14, 2005.
(5)	Incorporated herein by reference to the Exhibits to FedFirst Financial Corporation’s Form 10-KSB filed on March 30, 2006
(6)	Incorporated herein by reference to Appendix C to the Proxy Statement for FedFirst Financial Corporation’s 2006 Stockholders Meeting filed on April 13, 2006.
(7)	Incorporated herein by reference to the Exhibits to FedFirst Financial Corporation’s Form 10-KSB filed on March 26, 2007.

K-45

SIGNATURES

     In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	FedFirst Financial Corporation
Date: March 17, 2008	/s/ John G. Robinson By: John G. Robinson
	President and Chief Executive Officer

     In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title	Date
/s/ John G. Robinson John G. Robinson	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer)	March 17, 2008
/s/ Robert C. Barry, Jr. Robert C. Barry, Jr.	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	March 17, 2008
/s/ Richard B. Boyer Richard B. Boyer	Director	March 17, 2008
/s/ Joseph U. Frye Joseph U. Frye	Director	March 17, 2008
/s/ John M. Kish John M. Kish	Director	March 17, 2008
/s/ John J. LaCarte John J. LaCarte	Director	March 17, 2008
/s/ John M. McGinley John M. McGinley	Director	March 17, 2008
/s/ David L. Wohleber David L. Wohleber	Director	March 17, 2008

K-46

MONESSEN, PENNSYLVANIA

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Contents

	Page
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting		F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-3
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Statements of Financial Condition		F-4
Statements of Operations		F-5
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive (Loss) Income		F-6
Statements of Cash Flows		F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-8

F-1

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

FedFirst Financial Corporation’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based upon the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in a report entitled Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, management has concluded FedFirst Financial Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of FedFirst Financial Corporation’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by FedFirst Financial Corporation’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit FedFirst Financial Corporation to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors
FedFirst Financial Corporation and subsidiaries
Monessen, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying consolidated Statements of Financial Condition of FedFirst Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive (loss) income and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FedFirst Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 13, 2008

F-3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

December 31,	2007			2006
(Dollars in thousands except share data)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks	$	2,127		$	1,561
Interest-earning deposits		3,425			2,938
Total cash and cash equivalents		5,552			4,499
Securities available-for-sale		89,073			83,045
Loans, net		187,954			174,718
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, at cost		5,076			4,901
Accrued interest receivable — loans		966			1,033
Accrued interest receivable — securities		651			559
Premises and equipment, net		2,956			2,162
Bank-owned life insurance		7,538			7,259
Goodwill		1,080			1,080
Real estate owned		1,119			569
Other assets		366			1,165
Deferred tax assets and tax credit carryforwards		2,942			2,527
Total assets	$	305,273		$	283,517
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing		8,918			5,409
Interest-bearing		146,640			138,086
Total deposits		155,558			143,495
Borrowings		101,074			89,323
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		477			254
Accrued interest payable — deposits		1,116			1,180
Accrued interest payable — borrowings		413			319
Other liabilities		2,782			2,521
Total liabilities		261,420			237,092
Minority interest in subsidiary		80			79
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		—			—
Common stock $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 6,707,500 shares issued, 6,439,100 and 6,612,500 shares outstanding		67			67
Additional paid-in-capital		29,084			28,787
Retained earnings — substantially restricted		18,520			20,475
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of deferred taxes of $(45) and $(475)		(70	)		(737	)
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)		(2,074	)		(2,246	)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost (189,300 and 0 shares)		(1,754	)		—
Total stockholders’ equity		43,773			46,346
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	305,273		$	283,517

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-4

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31,	2007			2006
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Interest income:
Loans	$	10,535		$	10,004
Securities		4,186			3,421
Other interest-earning assets		530			444
Total interest income		15,251			13,869
Interest expense:
Deposits		5,174			4,018
Borrowings		3,579			3,645
Total interest expense		8,753			7,663
Net interest income		6,498			6,206
Provision for loan losses		1,119			84
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		5,379			6,122
Noninterest income:
Fees and service charges		412			361
Insurance commissions		1,639			1,527
Income from bank-owned life insurance		279			275
Net loss on sales of securities		(1,412	)		—
Net gain on sales of real estate owned		—			33
Other		15			44
Total noninterest income		933			2,240
Noninterest expense:
Compensation and employee benefits		5,656			4,782
Occupancy		1,156			838
FDIC insurance premiums		22			42
Data processing		387			321
Other		1,893			1,647
Total noninterest expense		9,114			7,630
Minority interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary		52			51
(Loss) income before income tax (benefit) expense		(2,854	)		681
Income tax (benefit) expense		(899	)		337
Net (loss) income	$	(1,955	)	$	344
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.31	)	$	0.05

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-5

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

									Accumulated						Common
			Additional						Other						Stock			Total
	Common		Paid-in-			Retained			Comprehensive			Unearned			Held in			Stockholders’			Comprehensive
	Stock		Capital			Earnings			Loss			ESOP			Treasury			Equity			Income (Loss)
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2006	$	66	$	28,648		$	20,131		$	(1,026	)	$	(2,419	)	$	—		$	45,400
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—			344			—			—			—			344		$	344
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax of $(186)		—		—			—			289			—			—			289			289
Issuance of common stock		1		—			—			—			—			—			1
ESOP shares committed to be released		—		(2	)		—			—			173			—			171
Stock-based compensation expense		—		141			—			—			—			—			141
Total comprehensive income																					$	633
Balance at December 31, 2006	$	67	$	28,787		$	20,475		$	(737	)	$	(2,246	)	$	—		$	46,346
Comprehensive income:
Net loss		—		—			(1,955	)		—			—			—			(1,955	)	$	(1,955	)
Transfer of securities to held for trading, net of tax of $(553)		—		—			—			857			—			—			857			857
Reclassification adjustment on sales of securities available-for-sale, net of tax										2									2			2
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax of $124		—		—			—			(192	)		—			—			(192	)		(192	)
Purchase of common stock to be held in treasury		—		—			—			—			—			(1,775	)		(1,775	)
ESOP shares committed to be released		—		(14	)		—			—			172			—			158
Stock-based compensation expense		—		333			—			—			—			—			333
Stock awards issued		—		(51	)		—			—			—			51			—
Stock awards forfeited		—		29			—			—			—			(30	)		(1	)
Total comprehensive (loss)																					$	(1,288	)
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	67	$	29,084		$	18,520		$	(70	)	$	(2,074	)	$	(1,754	)	$	43,773

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-6

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31,	2007			2006
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(1,955	)	$	344
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities
Minority interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary		52			51
Provision for loan losses		1,119			84
Depreciation		426			295
Net loss on sales of securities		1,412			—
Proceeds from sales of securities held for trading		40,483			—
Proceeds from principal repayments of securities held for trading		638			—
Net gain on sales of real estate owned		—			(33	)
Net gain on sale of student loan portfolio		—			(29	)
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(899	)		337
Net (amortization) accretion of security premiums and loan costs		(632	)		187
Noncash expense for ESOP		158			171
Noncash expense for stock-based compensation		333			141
Increase in bank-owned life insurance		(279	)		(275	)
Decrease (increase) in other assets		691			(1,109	)
Increase in other liabilities		412			1,038
Net cash provided by operating activities		41,959			1,202
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net loan originations		(15,050	)		(5,127	)
Proceeds from sale of student loan portfolio		12			1,441
Proceeds from maturities of and principal repayments of securities available-for-sale		16,045			14,352
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale		4,569			—
Purchases of securities available-for-sale		(67,370	)		(19,146	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,220	)		(387	)
(Decrease) increase in FHLB stock, at cost		(175	)		246
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned		—			92
Net cash used in investing activities		(63,189	)		(8,529	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings		11,751			(13,081	)
Net increase in deposits		12,063			18,598
Increase (decrease) in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		223			(37	)
Stock awards issued, net of forfeits		21			—
Purchases of common stock to be held in treasury		(1,775	)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		22,283			5,480
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,053			(1,847	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		4,499			6,346
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	5,552		$	4,499
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for:
Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	8,723		$	7,125
Income tax expense		49			64
Transfer of securities from available-for-sale to held for trading		42,531			—
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans		607			569

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-7

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	Nature of Operations

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of FedFirst Financial Corporation, a federally chartered holding company (“FedFirst Financial” or the “Company”), whose wholly owned subsidiaries are First Federal Savings Bank (the “Bank”), a federally chartered stock savings bank, and FedFirst Exchange Corporation (“FFEC”). FFEC has an 80% controlling interest in Exchange Underwriters, Inc. Exchange Underwriters, Inc. is a full-service, independent insurance agency that offers property and casualty, commercial liability, surety and other insurance products. The Company is a majority owned subsidiary of FedFirst Financial Mutual Holding Company (“FFMHC”), a federally chartered mutual holding company. FFMHC has virtually no operations and assets other than an investment in the Company, and is not included in these financial statements. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

We operate as a community-oriented financial institution offering residential, multi-family and commercial mortgages, consumer loans and commercial business loans to individuals and businesses from nine locations in southwestern Pennsylvania. We conduct insurance brokerage activities through Exchange Underwriters, Inc. The Bank is subject to competition from other financial institutions and to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.

On April 6, 2005, FedFirst Financial completed its initial public offering. The Company sold 2,975,625 shares of common stock, par value $0.01. In connection with the offering, the Company also sold 3,636,875 shares of common stock to FFMHC at $0.01 per share. As a result, FFMHC owned 55% of the Company’s original issuance of common stock. Proceeds from the offering totaled $28.7 million, net of stock issuance costs of approximately $1.1 million.

On September 21, 2006 the Company issued 95,000 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction with the FedFirst Financial Corporation 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. As a result, the issued shares outstanding increased to 6,707,500 which reduced FFMHC’s ownership to 54% of the Company’s common stock.

Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to determination of the allowance for losses on loans and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, evaluation of securities for other-than-temporary impairment and the valuation of deferred tax assets.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company has defined cash and cash equivalents as those amounts included in the statements of financial condition as cash and due from banks and interest-earning deposits.

F-8

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Securities

The Company classifies securities at the time of purchase as either held-to-maturity, trading or available-for-sale. Securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as securities held-to-maturity and are reported at amortized cost. Securities bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as securities for trading and reported at fair value with gains and losses included in earnings. The Company has no held-to-maturity or trading securities at December 31, 2007 or 2006. Securities not classified as held-to-maturity or trading securities are classified as securities available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts are amortized and accreted using the level yield method. Net gain or loss on the sale of securities is based on the amortized cost of the specific security sold.

Loans

Loans are stated at the outstanding principal amount of the loans, net of premiums and discounts on loans purchased, deferred loan costs, the allowance for loan losses and loans in process. Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to interest income as earned. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status at the earlier of when they become delinquent 90 days or more as to principal or interest or when it appears that principal or interest is uncollectible. Interest accrued prior to a loan being placed on nonaccrual status is subsequently reversed. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only in the period in which it is ultimately collected. Loans are returned to an accrual status when factors indicating doubtful collectibility no longer exist.

Loan fees, and direct costs of originating loans, are deferred and the net fee or cost is amortized to interest income as a yield adjustment over the contractual lives of the related loans using the interest method. Amortization of deferred loan fees is discontinued when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that in management’s judgment should be charged-off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, peer group information, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions and other factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not considered impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller balance homogenous loans of similar nature, such as one-to-four family residential mortgage and consumer loans, and on an individual basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired,

F-9

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported net at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Advertising Costs

The Company follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred. Total advertising expense was approximately $155,000 and $147,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Real Estate Owned

When properties are acquired through foreclosure, they are transferred at estimated fair value and any required write-downs are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequently, such properties are carried at the lower of the adjusted cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Estimated fair value of the property is generally based on an appraisal.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Office properties and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Buildings and leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method using useful lives ranging from 10 to 40 years.

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years. Charges for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance

The Company purchased insurance on the lives of certain key employees which includes executive officers and directors. The policies accumulate asset values to meet future liabilities, including the payment of employee benefits. Increases in the cash surrender value are recorded as noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance is recorded as an asset on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of Exchange Underwriters, Inc. as of June 1, 2002 over the fair value of its net assets. The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standard (“FAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which requires that goodwill be reported separate from other intangible assets in the Statement of Financial Condition and not be amortized but tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise for impairment. No impairment charge was deemed necessary for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in the deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements’ carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, computed using enacted tax rates. The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance provided, when necessary, for that

F-10

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

portion of the asset which is not likely to be realized. Management believes, based upon current facts, that it is more likely than not there will be sufficient taxable income in future years to realize the deferred tax assets. The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return.

Investment in Affordable Housing Projects

The Company accounted for its limited partnership interests in affordable housing projects under the cost-recovery method. The investment was included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The Company received tax credits each year over a ten-year period, contingent upon the affordable housing projects meeting certain qualified tenant occupancy rates as defined in the Internal Revenue Code Section 42. The investment was completely amortized at December 31, 2005. The investment was amortized in proportion to the current year tax credit over the total tax credit available. The Company did not record any tax credits for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, there was approximately $1.0 million of credits that have not been utilized. The credits have been reflected as an asset, and are available to be used to offset future taxes payable with the credits expiring in years 2021 through 2025.

Comprehensive Income

The Company is required to present comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose financial statements for all periods presented. Other comprehensive income is comprised of net unrealized holding gains (losses) on its available-for-sale securities. The Company has elected to report the effects of its other comprehensive income as part of the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive (Loss) Income.

Federal Home Loan Bank System

The Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System. As a member, the Bank maintains an investment in the capital stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) of 1.0% of its outstanding conventional mortgage loans, 0.3% of its total assets or 1/20 of its advances (borrowings), whichever is greater. Deficiencies, if any, in the required investment at the end of any reporting period are purchased in the subsequent reporting period. The Company may receive dividends on its FHLB capital stock, which are included in interest income and are recognized when declared. The investment is carried at cost. No ready market exists for the stock, and it has no quoted market value.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed in a manner similar to basic earnings per common share except that the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding is increased to include the incremental common shares (as computed using the treasury stock method) that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents were issued during the period. Common stock equivalents include restricted stock awards and stock options. Anti-dilutive shares are common stock equivalents with weighted-average exercise prices in excess of the weighted-average market value for the periods presented. Unallocated common shares held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating both basic and diluted earnings per common share until they are committed to be released.

F-11

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Stock-Based Compensation

On May 24, 2006, FedFirst Financial Corporation’s stockholders approved the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to promote the Company’s success and enhance its value by linking the personal interests of its employees, officers, directors and directors emeritus to those of the Company’s stockholders, and by providing participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. All of the Company’s salaried employees, officers and directors are eligible to participate in the Plan. The Plan authorizes the granting of options to purchase shares of the Company’s stock, which may be non-statutory stock options or incentive stock options, and restricted stock which is subject to restrictions on transferability and subject to forfeiture. The Plan reserved an aggregate number of 453,617 shares of which 324,012 may be issued in connection with the exercise of stock options and 129,605 may be issued as restricted stock.

Awards are typically granted with a 5 year vesting period and a vesting rate of 20% per year. The contractual life of stock options is typically 10 years from the date of grant. The exercise price for options is the closing price on the date of grant. The Company recognizes expense associated with the awards over the vesting period in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation is recognized ratably over the remaining service period. The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the market value on the date of grant is calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, using assumptions for expected life, expected dividend rate, risk-free interest rate, and an expected volatility.

Reclassifications of Prior Year’s Statements

Certain previously reported items have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s classifications.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51. In December, 2007 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS 160 establishes standards related to the treatment of noncontrolling interests. A noncontrolling interest, sometimes called a minority interest, is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. SFAS No. 160 will require noncontrolling interests to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other item outside permanent equity. The Statement applies to the accounting for noncontrolling interests and transactions with noncontrolling interest holders in consolidated financial statements. The objective of this Statement is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. Before this Statement was issued, limited guidance existed for reporting noncontrolling interests. As a result, considerable diversity in practice existed. So-called minority interests were reported in the consolidated statement of financial position as liabilities or in the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity. This statement, which the Company does not anticipate having a material effect on its financial condition or operations upon adoption, is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is prohibited.

The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities: In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing certain entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 expands the use of fair value

F-12

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

accounting but does not affect existing standards which require assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. This statement, which the Company does not anticipate having a material effect on its financial condition or operations upon adoption, is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.

Fair Value Measurements: In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement does not require any new fair value measurements, however, for some entities the application of this Statement will change current practice.

This statement, which the Company does not anticipate having a material effect on its financial condition or operations upon adoption, is effective for years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years.

Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157: In December 2007, the FASB issued proposed FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-b, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, that would permit a one-year deferral in applying the measurement provisions of SFAS 157 to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities (non-financial items) that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entity’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Therefore, if the change in fair value of a non-financial item is not required to be recognized or disclosed in the financial statements on an annual basis or more frequently, the effective date of application of SFAS 157 to that item is deferred until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. This deferral does not apply, however, to an entity that applies SFAS 157 in interim or annual financial statements before proposed FSP 157-b is finalized. The Company does not anticipate this staff position having a material effect on its financial condition or operations upon adoption.

Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements: In March 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-4 stating that for an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement, an employer should recognize a liability for future benefits based on the substantive agreement with the employee. The consensus is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company will recognize the effects of applying the consensus on this issue through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2008.

Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards: In June 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-11 stating that an entity should recognize a realized tax benefit associated with dividends on nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units and outstanding equity share options charged to retained earnings as an increase in additional paid-in-capital. The amount recognized in additional paid-in-capital should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. Issue No. 06-11 should be applied prospectively to income tax benefits of dividends on equity-classified share-based payment awards that are declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company does not anticipate that EITF No. 06-11 will have a material impact on its financial condition or operations upon adoption.

F-13

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2. Securities

The following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
December 31, 2007	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Government-sponsored enterprises	$	22,321	$	353	$	—	$	22,674
Mortgage-backed		34,948		242		37		35,153
REMICs		27,875		80		478		27,477
Corporate debt		3,995		—		275		3,720
Equities		49		—		—		49
Total securities available-for-sale	$	89,188	$	675	$	790	$	89,073

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
December 31, 2006	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Government-sponsored enterprises	$	30,475	$	14	$	453	$	30,036
Mortgage-backed		14,892		96		103		14,885
REMICs		34,831		52		762		34,121
Corporate debt		4,010		—		56		3,954
Equities		49		—		—		49
Total securities available-for-sale	$	84,257	$	162	$	1,374	$	83,045

The following table presents gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities aggregated by category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

	Less than 12 months				12 months or more								Total
	Number of		Fair		Unrealized		Number of		Fair		Unrealized		Number of		Fair		Unrealized
December 31, 2007	Securities		Value		Losses		Securities		Value		Losses		Securities		Value		Losses
Mortgage-backed		8	$	9,946	$	35		3	$	119	$	2		11	$	10,065	$	37
REMICs		12		12,445		404		8		1,924		74		20		14,369		478
Corporate debt		—		—		—		3		3,720		275		3		3,720		275
Total securities temporarily impaired		20	$	22,391	$	439		14	$	5,763	$	351		34	$	28,154	$	790

	Less than 12 months						12 months or more						Total
	Number of		Fair		Unrealized		Number of		Fair		Unrealized		Number of		Fair		Unrealized
December 31, 2006	Securities		Value		Losses		Securities		Value		Losses		Securities		Value		Losses
Government-sponsored enterprises		7	$	11,042	$	41		12	$	15,014	$	412		19	$	26,056	$	453
Mortgage-backed		18		1,479		2		14		4,078		101		32		5,557		103
REMICs		3		771		—		33		27,374		762		36		28,145		762
Corporate debt		—		—		—		3		3,954		56		3		3,954		56
Total securities temporarily impaired		28	$	13,292	$	43		62	$	50,420	$	1,331		90	$	63,712	$	1,374

The policy of the Company is to recognize an other-than-temporary impairment on equity securities where the fair value has been significantly below cost for three consecutive quarters. For fixed-maturity investments with unrealized losses due to interest rates where the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow a market recovery, declines in value below cost are not assumed to be other-than-temporary. The Company reviews its position quarterly and has concluded that at December 31, 2007 the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines and the Company does have the intent and ability to hold those securities either to maturity or to allow a

F-14

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

market recovery. The Company has concluded that any impairment of its securities portfolio is not other-than-temporary, but is the result of interest rate changes, sector credit rating changes, or company-specific rating changes that are not expected to result in the non-collection of principal and interest.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at December 31, 2007 by contractual maturity were as follows. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties (dollars in thousands).

	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Due in one year or less	$	70	$	69
Due from one to five years		3,183		3,204
Due from five to ten years		17,239		17,498
Due after ten years		68,647		68,253
No scheduled maturity		49		49
Total	$	89,188	$	89,073

Securities with an amortized cost and fair value of $9.0 and $8.9 million, respectively, were pledged at December 31, 2007 to secure public deposits. Securities with an amortized cost and fair value of $2.2 million were pledged at December 31, 2006.

In April, 2007, the Company restructured its securities portfolio through the sale of approximately $40.5 million of securities which were yielding an average of 4.08%. Approximately $30.5 million of the proceeds from the sale of these securities were reinvested in securities yielding an average of 5.44% and the remaining $10.0 million was utilized to pay maturing short-term FHLB borrowings. The purpose was to better position the Company for an uncertain interest rate environment, improve interest rate spread and net interest margin without increasing interest rate risk, and reduce leverage. The decision to sell the securities required the Company to reclassify the securities from available-for-sale to held for trading at March 31, 2007. As a result, at March 31, 2007, the Company held $41.1 million of securities held for trading, which consisted of $24.0 million of REMIC pass-through certificates, $14.2 million of Government-sponsored enterprise securities, and $2.9 million of mortgage backed securities. All of the securities in the trading portfolio were subsequently sold in April, 2007. Proceeds from securities restructuring and sale of held-for-trading securities for the year ended December 31, 2007 were $40.5 million with realized losses of $1.4 million. The Company had no sales of held-for-trading securities for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Proceeds from the sales of securities available-for-sale for the year ended December 31, 2007 were $4.6 million. Related realized losses totaled $2,000. The Company had no sales of securities available-for-sale for the year ended December 31, 2006.

3. Loans

The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

F-15

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31,	2007			2006
Real estate — mortgage:
One-to-four family residential	$	135,453		$	133,821
Multi-family		11,042			18,410
Commercial		15,426			5,437
Total real estate — mortgage		161,921			157,668
Real estate — construction:
Residential		6,671			5,021
Commercial		—			1,750
Total real estate — construction		6,671			6,771
Consumer:
Home equity		17,862			9,470
Loans on savings accounts		675			493
Home improvement		281			381
Other		592			531
Total consumer		19,410			10,875
Commercial business		4,341			2,616
Total loans	$	192,343		$	177,930
Premium on loans purchased		310			465
Net deferred loan costs		491			432
Discount on loans purchased		(119	)		(139	)
Loans in process		(3,614	)		(3,104	)
Allowance for loan losses		(1,457	)		(866	)
Loans, net	$	187,954		$	174,718

The Company’s primary lending area is southwestern Pennsylvania. The Company requires collateral on all real estate-mortgage loans and generally maintains loan to value ratios of no greater than 80% without private mortgage insurance. Loan to value ratios on home equity loans may exceed 80%.

Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows (dollars in thousands).

Years Ended December 31,	2007			2006
Allowance at beginning of year	$	866		$	800
Provision for loan losses		1,119			84
Charge-offs		(528	)		(18	)
Recoveries		—			—
Net charge-offs		(528	)		(18	)
Allowance at end of year	$	1,457		$	866

F-16

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The nonaccrual loans in the following table for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist primarily of one-to-four family residential-mortgage loans. Nonperforming loans were as follows (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007		2006
Accruing loans past due 90 or more days	$	—	$	—
Nonaccrual loans		1,281		767
Total nonperforming loans	$	1,281	$	767

4. Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are summarized by major classifications as follows (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007		2006
Land and land improvements	$	450	$	426
Buildings and leasehold improvements		4,442		3,758
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		3,116		2,604
Total, at cost		8,008		6,788
Less: accumulated depreciation		5,052		4,626
Premises and equipment, net	$	2,956	$	2,162

Depreciation expense was approximately $426,000 and $295,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

5. Deposits

Deposits are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007		2006
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	8,918	$	5,409
Interest-bearing demand deposits		11,864		12,530
Savings accounts		23,056		26,525
Money market accounts		13,676		7,663
Certificates of deposit		98,044		91,368
Total deposits	$	155,558	$	143,495

Interest expense by deposit category was as follows (dollars in thousands).

Years ended December 31,	2007		2006
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	61		62
Savings accounts		250		289
Money market accounts		464		107
Certificates of deposit		4,399		3,560
Total interest expense	$	5,174	$	4,018

The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $100,000 totaled $18.5 million and $15.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Deposit amounts in excess of $100,000 are generally not federally insured, with the exception of certain self-directed retirement accounts which are insured up to $250,000.

F-17

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit were as follows (dollars in thousands):

December 31,	2007			2006
2008	$	68,144	2007	$	61,192
2009		11,029	2008		9,675
2010		5,223	2009		5,087
2011		3,379	2010		4,619
2012		3,493	2011		2,925
Thereafter		6,776	Thereafter		7,870
Total	$	98,044	Total	$	91,368

6. Borrowings

We utilize borrowings as a supplemental source of funds for loans and securities. The primary source of borrowings are FHLB advances and, to a limited extent, repurchase agreements. Borrowings consisted of the following (dollars in thousands).

	Weighted
	Average Rate						Balance
December 31,	2007			2006			2007		2006
Due in one year or less		3.91	%		4.73	%	$	28,856	$	40,520
Due in one to two years		4.46			3.58			20,548		15,524
Due in two to three years		4.31			3.95			21,921		5,846
Due in three to four years		4.29			3.38			7,205		11,294
Due in four to five years		4.75			4.30			16,531		8,421
Due after five years		4.38			4.16			6,013		7,718
Total advances		4.30	%		4.22	%	$	101,074	$	89,323

Advances from the FHLB are secured by the Bank’s stock in the FHLB and certain qualifying mortgage-backed securities to the extent that the defined statutory value must be at least equal to the advances outstanding. The maximum remaining borrowing capacity at the FHLB at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $85.5 million and $99.2 million, respectively. The advances are subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of prepayment.

7. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed in a manner similar to basic earnings per common share except that the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding is increased to include the incremental common shares (as computed using the treasury stock method) that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents were issued during the period. Common stock equivalents include restricted stock awards and stock options. Anti-dilutive shares are common stock equivalents with weighted-average exercise prices in excess of the weighted-average market value for the periods presented. There was no dilution from stock options for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Unallocated common shares held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating both basic and diluted earnings per common share until they are committed to be released.

F-18

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31,	2007			2006
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net (loss) income	$	(1,955	)	$	344
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic		6,328,239			6,379,211
Effect of dilutive restricted stock awards		—			50,354
Diluted		6,328,239			6,429,565
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.31	)	$	0.05
Diluted		(0.31	)		0.05

8. Operating Leases

The Company leases certain properties under operating leases expiring in various years through 2017. Lease expense was $134,000 and $90,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Minimum future rental payments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007
2008	$	185
2009		180
2010		159
2011		111
2012		94
Thereafter		378
Total	$	1,107

9. Income Taxes

The difference between actual income tax (benefit) expense and the amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate of 34% to income (loss) before income taxes were reconciled as follows (dollars in thousands).

Years ended December 31,	2007			2006
Computed income tax (benefit) expense	$	(970	)	$	232
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
State taxes (net of federal benefit)		49			97
Nontaxable BOLI income		(95	)		(93	)
Stock-based compensation (ISO’s)		85			37
Other, net		32			64
Actual income tax (benefit) expense	$	(899	)	$	337
Effective tax rate		N/A			N/A

F-19

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, as follows (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007			2006
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	495		$	294
Investments in affordable housing projects		104			104
Postretirement benefits		691			607
Net operating loss carryforwards		716			205
Stock-based compensation (NSO’s)		38			11
Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale		45			475
Total deferred tax assets		2,089			1,696
Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred loan costs		(167	)		(147	)
Depreciation and amortization		(20	)		(62	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(187	)		(209	)
Net deferred tax assets		1,902			1,487
Tax credit carryforwards		1,040			1,040
Total deferred tax assets and tax credit carryforwards	$	2,942		$	2,527

The net operating loss carryforwards are available to offset future taxes payable with the carryforwards expiring in 2021 and 2022. Management believes that it will realize the deferred tax assets. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled.

Income tax expense is summarized as follows (dollars in thousands).

Years ended December 31,	2007			2006
Currently payable	$	—		$	—
Deferred (benefit) expense		(899	)		337
Total tax (benefit) expense	$	(899	)	$	337

10. Regulatory Matters

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possible additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table following) of Total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets, all of which are defined by the regulatory agencies to which the Bank is subject. Management believes, at December 31, 2007, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

F-20

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the most recent notifications from the Regulators categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes would change the Bank’s categorization.

The following table sets forth the Bank’s regulatory capital amounts and ratios, as well as the minimum amounts and ratios required to be well capitalized (dollars in thousands).

											To Be Well
						For Capital					Capitalized
						Adequacy					Under Prompt
	Actual					Purposes					Corrective Action
December 31, 2007	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	31,481		21.54	%	$	11,692		8.00	%	$	14,615		10.00	%
Tier I capital (to risk weighted assets)		30,024		20.54			5,846		4.00			8,769		6.00
Tier I capital (to adjusted total assets)		30,024		9.86			12,175		4.00			15,219		5.00
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)		30,024		9.86			4,566		1.50			N/A		N/A
December 31, 2006	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)	$	32,608		24.61	%	$	10,601		8.00	%	$	13,252		10.00	%
Tier I capital (to risk weighted assets)		31,742		23.95			5,301		4.00			7,951		6.00
Tier I capital (to adjusted total assets)		31,742		11.19			11,348		4.00			14,185		5.00
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)		31,742		11.19			4,255		1.50			N/A		N/A

The following is a reconciliation of the Bank’s equity under GAAP to regulatory capital at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007			2006
GAAP equity	$	31,034		$	32,085
Goodwill		(1,080	)		(1,080	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)		70			737
Tier I capital		30,024			31,742
General regulatory allowance for loan losses		1,457			866
Total capital	$	31,481		$	32,608

Federal banking regulations place certain restrictions on dividends paid by the Bank to the Company. The total amount of dividends that may be paid at any date is generally limited to the earnings of the Bank for the year to date plus retained earnings for the prior two fiscal years, net of any prior capital distributions. In addition, dividends paid by the Bank to the Company would be prohibited if the distribution would cause the Bank’s capital to be reduced below the applicable minimum capital requirements.

11.	Benefit Plans
	401(k) Plan

The Company maintains a 401(k) plan for all salaried employees and may make a discretionary contribution to the plan based on a computation in relation to net income and compensation expense. The Company also matches the first 5% of employee deferrals on a graduated scale of 100% of the first 1-3%, and 50% thereafter up to a maximum of 4%. Plan expense was approximately $131,000 and $114,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. A full-time employee is

F-21

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

eligible to participate in the plan after three months of employment, the attainment of age 21, and completion of 250 hours of service each Plan year.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

The Company maintains a nonqualified defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”) for certain key executive officers and a nonqualified defined benefit SERP for certain directors. The present value of estimated supplemental retirement benefits is charged to operations. A set retirement benefit is provided to the directors, but no set retirement is promised to officers, and no deferral of salary or income is required by the participants. Rather, the company has agreed to place a certain amount of funds into an insurance policy on behalf of the participants. Each year, whatever income the policy generates, in the case of officers, above and beyond a predetermined index rate will be accrued into a retirement account that has been established for the participant. The expense for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $278,000 and $235,000, respectively.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

On April 6, 2005 the Bank established an ESOP, whereby the ESOP purchased 259,210 shares of FedFirst Financial from proceeds provided by the Company in the form of a loan. The effective date of the ESOP is January 1, 2005 and it is considered a leveraged plan. Effective January 1, 2006, a full-time employee is eligible to participate in the plan after three months of employment, the attainment of age 21, and completion of 250 hours of service in a Plan year. Each plan year, the Bank may, at its discretion, make additional contributions to the plan; however, at a minimum, the Bank has agreed to provide a contribution in the amount necessary to service the debt incurred to acquire the stock.

Shares are scheduled for release as the loan is repaid based on the interest method. The present amortization schedule calls for 17,281 shares to be released each December 31. There were no dividends declared or paid for the years ended December 31, 2007 or 2006.

In connection with the formation of the ESOP, the Company adopted the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 93-6, Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans. As shares in the ESOP are earned and committed to be released, compensation expense is recorded based on their average fair value. The difference between the average fair value of the shares committed to be released and the cost of those shares to the ESOP is charged or credited to additional paid-in capital. The balance of unearned shares held by the ESOP is shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. Only those shares in the ESOP which have been earned and are committed to be released are included in the computation of earnings per share.

ESOP compensation expense was $158,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $171,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006. There were 17,281 shares earned and committed to be released and 32,344 allocated shares at December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2006, there were 17,281 shares earned and committed to be released and 16,931 allocated shares. The 207,367 and 224,648 remaining unearned/unallocated shares at December 31, 2007 and 2006 had an approximate fair market value of $1.9 and $2.2 million.

12.

Stock-Based Compensation

On May 24, 2006, FedFirst Financial Corporation’s stockholders approved the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to promote the Company’s success and enhance its value by linking the personal interests of its employees, officers, directors and directors emeritus to those of the Company’s stockholders, and by providing participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. All of the Company’s salaried employees, officers and directors are eligible to participate in the Plan. The Plan authorizes the granting of options to purchase shares of the Company’s stock, which may be non-statutory stock options or incentive stock options, and restricted stock which is subject to restrictions on transferability and subject to forfeiture. The Plan reserved an aggregate number of 453,617 shares of which

F-22

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

324,012 may be issued in connection with the exercise of stock options and 129,605 may be issued as restricted stock.

On August 8, 2006, the non-employee directors (including director emeritus) were granted an aggregate of 22,500 restricted shares of common stock and 50,000 options to purchase shares of common stock. In addition, on the same date, certain officers and key employees of the Company were awarded an aggregate of 72,500 restricted shares of common stock and 183,000 options to purchase shares of common stock. The Company’s common stock closed at $10.11 per share on August 8, 2006, which is the exercise price of the options granted on that date. The market value of the restricted stock awards was approximately $960,450, before the impact of income taxes. The estimated value of the stock options was $736,280, before the impact of income taxes. The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the market value on August 8, 2006 was $3.16, using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected life of 7 years, expected dividend rate of 0%, risk-free interest rate of 5.25% and an expected volatility of 10%, based on historical results.

On July 24, 2007, a non-employee director was granted 3,000 restricted shares of common stock and 7,500 options to purchase shares of common stock. In addition, certain officers and key employees of the Company were awarded an aggregate of 2,500 restricted shares of common stock and 5,000 options to purchase shares of common stock. The awards vest over five years at the rate of 20% per year and the stock options have a 10 year contractual life from the date of grant. The Company’s common stock closed at $9.00 per share on July 24, 2007, which is the exercise price of the options granted on that date. The market value of the restricted stock awards was approximately $49,500, before the impact of income taxes. The estimated value of the stock options was $35,000, before the impact of income taxes. The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the market value on July 24, 2007 was $2.80 using the following Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model assumptions: expected life of 7 years, expected dividend rate of 0%, risk-free interest rate of 4.87% and an expected volatility of 13%, based on historical results.

The Company recognizes expense associated with the awards over the five-year vesting period in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Compensation expense was $333,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $141,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2007, there was $1.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation compared to $1.6 million at December 31, 2006. The compensation expense cost at December 31, 2007 is expected to be recognized ratably over the remaining service period of 3.6 years. There is no intrinsic value for stock options at December 31, 2007. The realized tax benefit for stock options (NSO’s) was $27,000 and $11,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

F-23

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

			Stock Options
			Weighted		Weighted
	Number		Average		Average
	of		Exercise		Remaining
Stock-Based Compensation	Shares		Price		Term
Outstanding at January 1, 2006		—	$	—
Granted		233,000		10.11
Exercised or converted		—		—
Forfeited		—		—
Expired		—		—
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		233,000	$	10.11		9.75
Granted		12,500		9.00
Exercised or converted		—		—
Forfeited		6,000		10.11
Expired		—		—
Outstanding at December 31, 2007		239,500	$	10.05		8.80
Exercisable at December 31, 2007		45,400	$	10.11		8.75

	Stock Options				Restricted Stock Awards
	Number of		Fair-Value		Number of		Fair-Value
	Shares		Price		Shares		Price
Nonvested at January 1, 2006		—	$	—		—	$	—
Granted		233,000		3.16		95,000		10.11
Vested		—		—		—		—
Forfeited		—		—		—		—
Nonvested at December 31, 2006		233,000	$	3.16		95,000	$	10.11
Granted		12,500		2.80		5,500		9.00
Vested		45,400		3.16		18,400		10.11
Forfeited		6,000		3.16		3,000		10.11
Nonvested at December 31, 2007		194,100	$	3.14		79,100	$	10.03

13. Concentration of Credit Risk

The risk of loss from lending and investing activities includes the possibility that a loss may occur from the failure of another party to perform according to the terms of the loan or investment agreement. This possibility of loss is known as credit risk. Credit risk can be reduced by diversifying the Company’s assets to prevent imprudent concentrations. The Company has adopted policies designed to prevent imprudent concentrations within its security and loan portfolio.

The primary investment vehicles for the Company for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were mortgage-backed securities, which are comprised of diversified individual residential mortgage notes, and REMICs (real estate mortgage investment conduits), which represent a participation interest in a pool of mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities are guaranteed as to the timely repayment of principal and interest by a Government-sponsored enterprise. REMICs are created by redirecting the cash flows from the pool of mortgages underlying those securities to create two or more classes (or tranches) with different maturity or risk characteristics designed to meet a variety of investor needs and preferences. REMICs may be sponsored

F-24

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

by private issuers, such as money center banks or mortgage bankers, or by U.S. Government agencies and Government-sponsored enterprises. Investments in other securities consist of Government-sponsored securities which are made to provide and maintain liquidity within the guidelines of applicable regulations.

Substantially all of the Company’s loans, excluding those serviced by others, are made to customers located in southwestern Pennsylvania. The Company does not have any other concentration of credit risk representing greater than 10% of loans.

     Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, consumer and commercial lines of credit, and fixed and variable rate mortgage loan commitments with interest rates ranging from 6.125% to 7.5% and are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands).

December 31,	2007		2006
Unused revolving home equity lines of credit	$	2,207	$	2,080
Unused commercial business lines of credit		802		1,782
One-to-four family residential commitments		2,647		2,178
Home equity commitments		235		—
Commercial commitments		273		—
Total commitments outstanding	$	6,164	$	6,040

14. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following presents the fair value of financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be sustained by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. Certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from the disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

     Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amounts approximate the asset’s fair values.

     Securities (Including Mortgage-Backed Securities)

Fair values of investment securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

F-25

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     Loans

The fair values for one-to-four family residential loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using yields from similar products in the secondary markets. The fair values of consumer and commercial loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates reported in various government releases. The fair values of multi-family and nonresidential mortgages are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates based on FNMA commitment rates or similar loans.

     Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The carrying amount approximates the asset’s fair value.

     Accrued Interest Receivable and Accrued Interest Payable

The fair value of these instruments approximates the carrying value.

     Deposits

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (eg., passbook savings accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the repricing date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values of certificates of deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advance yield curve to the maturity schedule of the Bank’s certificates of deposit.

     Borrowings

The fair value of the FHLB advances and repurchase agreements are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

     Commitments to Extend Credit

These financial instruments are generally not subject to sale and estimated fair values are not readily available. The carrying value, represented by the net deferred fee arising from the unrecognized commitment, and the fair value determined by discounting the remaining contractual fee over the term of the commitment using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements with similar credit risk, are not considered material for disclosure purposes. The contractual amounts of unfunded commitments are presented in Note 13 to these financial statements.

F-26

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table sets forth the carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments (dollars in thousands).

	2007				2006
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
December 31,	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,552	$	5,552	$	4,499	$	4,499
Securities		89,073		89,073		83,045		83,045
Loans, net		187,954		190,725		174,718		173,872
FHLB stock		5,076		5,076		4,901		4,901
Accrued interest receivable		1,617		1,617		1,592		1,592
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		155,558		155,821		143,495		142,545
Borrowings		101,074		102,142		89,323		88,086
Accrued interest payable		1,529		1,529		1,499		1,499

15. Condensed Financial Statements of Parent Company

Financial information pertaining only to FedFirst Financial Corporation (dollars in thousands).

Statements of Financial Condition

December 31,	2007		2006
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,444	$	11,832
Investment in the Bank		31,034		32,085
Loan receivable, ESOP		2,200		2,325
Other assets		285		135
Total assets	$	43,963	$	46,377
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity:
Accrued expenses		190		31
Stockholder’s equity		43,773		46,346
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	43,963	$	46,377

F-27

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Statements of Operations

Years ended December 31,	2007			2006
Interest income	$	134		$	140
Operating expense		241			221
Net loss before undistributed (loss) income of subsidiary and income tax benefit		(107	)		(81	)
Undistributed net (loss) income of subsidiary		(1,880	)		401
(Loss) income before income tax benefit		(1,987	)		320
Income tax benefit		(32	)		(24	)
Net (loss) income	$	(1,955	)	$	344

Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended December 31,	2007			2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(1,955	)	$	344
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities:
Undistributed net loss (income) in subsidiary		1,880			(401	)
Noncash expense for stock-based compensation		333			141
Increase in other assets		(150	)		(121	)
Increase in other liabilities		133			—
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		241			(37	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
ESOP loan principal payments received		125			118
Net cash provided by investing activities		125			118
Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchases of common stock to be held in treasury		(1,775	)		—
Stock awards issued, net of forfeits		21			—
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,754	)		—
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,388	)		81
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		11,832			11,751
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	10,444		$	11,832

F-28

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

16. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes selected information regarding the Company’s results of operations for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands).

	March 31,			June 30,			September 30,			December 31,
Three Months Ended	2007			2007			2007			2007
Interest income	$	3,638		$	3,708		$	3,825		$	4,080
Interest expense		2,124			2,058			2,176			2,395
Net interest income		1,514			1,650			1,649			1,685
Provision for loan losses		45			30			395			649
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		1,469			1,620			1,254			1,036
Noninterest income		(650	)		516			575			492
Noninterest expense		2,214			2,205			2,326			2,369
Minority interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary		31			7			15			(1	)
Loss before income tax benefit		(1,426	)		(76	)		(512	)		(840	)
Income tax benefit		(457	)		(18	)		(165	)		(259	)
Net loss	$	(969	)	$	(58	)	$	(347	)	$	(581	)
Earnings (loss) per share basic and diluted	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.09	)

	March 31,		June 30,		September 30,		December 31,
Three Months Ended	2006		2006		2006		2006
Interest income	$	3,322	$	3,400	$	3,438	$	3,709
Interest expense		1,783		1,803		1,925		2,152
Net interest income		1,539		1,597		1,513		1,557
Provision for loan losses		20		20		29		15
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		1,519		1,577		1,484		1,542
Noninterest income		725		542		503		470
Noninterest expense		1,832		1,908		1,887		2,003
Minority interest in net income of consolidated subsidiary		31		6		10		4
Income before income tax expense		381		205		90		5
Income tax expense		143		55		35		104
Net income (loss)	$	238	$	150	$	55	$	(99	)
Earnings (loss) per share basic and diluted	$	0.04	$	0.02	$	0.01	$	(0.02	)

F-29

EX-23.0

Exhibit 23.0

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 13, 2008 on the consolidated Statements of Financial Condition of FedFirst Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of FedFirst Financial Corporation, in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-124124 and 333-135672) filed by FedFirst Financial Corporation with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ Beard Miller Company LLP

Beard Miller Company LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 13, 2008

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, John G. Robinson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, of FedFirst Financial Corporation;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 17, 2008

/s/ John G. Robinson   

John G. Robinson 

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I, Robert C. Barry, Jr., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, of FedFirst Financial Corporation;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 17, 2008

/s/ Robert C. Barry, Jr.  

Robert C. Barry, Jr. 

Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President
Principal Financial Officer 

EX-32.0

Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of FedFirst Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

Date: March 17, 2008

/s/ John G. Robinson  

John G. Robinson 

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 

/s/ Robert C. Barry, Jr.  

Robert C. Barry, Jr. 

Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President