U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

OR

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 000-51151

Uranium Star Corp.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Minnesota	20-0803515
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

520 – 141 Adelaide Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5H 3L5

(Address of principal executive offices)

_______________________

(416) 364-4986

(Issuer’s telephone number)

_______________________
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

_______________________

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

(Title of Class)

Check whether the issuer: (i) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [_] No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes  No  x 

Large accelerated filer  ¨                    Accelerated filer  ¨                    Non–Accelerated filer  ¨ Small Business Issuer  x

As of  November 10,2009,  there were 86,444,357 shares of the Registrant's common stock issued and outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format Yes      No   x

Uranium Star Corp.

      Page

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets	F1
	Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss	F2
	Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F3
	Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements	F4 – F13
Item 2.	Management Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	17
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	17
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	19
Item 1a	Risk Factors	19
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	26
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	26
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	26
Item 5	Other information	26
Item 6.	Exhibits	27

CERTIFICATIONS

Exhibit 31 – Management certification…………………………………………………... 29-32

Exhibit 32 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act………………………………………………………….33-34

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Interim Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

General

The accompanying reviewed interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q.  Therefore, they do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and stockholders' equity in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  Except as disclosed herein, there has been no material change in the information disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.  Operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ending June 30, 2010.

1

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

(Unaudited)

(Expressed in US dollars)

September 30, 2009

Index

Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets

F 1

Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

F 2

Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

F 3

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

F 4 – F13

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

	September   30, 2009	June 30, 2009
		(Audited)
	$	$
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	1,503,822	2,776,177
Amounts receivable	16,829	120,330
Marketable securities	26,115	24,086
Taxes recoverable	415,677	383,366
Total current assets	1,962,443	3,303,959
Property and equipment	22,223	24,445
Total Assets	1,984,666	3,328,404
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	217,419	154,580
Total Liabilities	217,419	154,580
Going Concern (Note 1)
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, 175,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value, 86,194,357 shares issued and outstanding (June 30, 2009 – 83,694,357 shares)	86,193	83,693
Additional paid-in capital	40,288,688	39,610,163
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(47,056)	(49,086)
Donated capital	20,750	20,750
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage	(38,581,328)	(36,491,696)
Total stockholders’ equity	1,767,247	3,173,824
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	1,984,666	3,328,404

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements

F-1

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Accumulated From March 1, 2004 (Date of Inception) to September 30,	For the 3 months Ended September 30,
	2009	2009	2008
	$	$	$
Revenue	-	-	-
Expenses
Amortization	39,696	2,222	4,323
Donated services and expenses	18,750	-	-
Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss	(572,065)	(65,469)	71,109
General and administrative	2,738,097	252,815	153,850
Impairment loss on mineral properties	7,588,508	100,000	-
Mineral exploration	12,077,439	891,430	606,589
Professional fees	1,803,298	233,023	71,147
Stock based compensation (Notes 6 and 7)	15,831,736	681,025	-
Loss from operations before undernoted items	39,525,459	2,095,046	907,018
Other income
Interest income	(640,278)	(5,414)	(13,045)
Other income	(303,853)	-	(50,000)
Total loss before provision for income taxes	38,581,328	2,089,632	843,973
Income tax expense (recovery)	-	-	(426,772)
Net loss	38,581,328	2,089,632	417,201
Unrealized loss (gain) from investments in     marketable securities	(47,056)	(2,030)	20,025
Comprehensive loss	38,534,272	2,087,602	437,226
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted	-	(0.01)	(0.01)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding	-	86,194,357	71,636,357

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements

F - 2

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Accumulated From March 1, 2004 (Date of Inception) To September 30,		For the 3 months Ended September 30,
	2009		2009	2008
	$		$	$
Operating Activities
Net loss	(38,581,328)	(2,089,632)		(417,201)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Amortization	39,696	2,222		4,323
Non-cash proceeds received	(74,000)	-		-
Donated services	20,750	-		-
Deferred tax expense (recovery)	-	-		(426,772)
Impairment loss on mineral properties	7,588,508	100,000		-
Stock-based compensation	15,831,736	681,025		-
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Amounts receivable	(16,828)	103,502		-
Accounts payable	218,245	62,839		(106,613)
Taxes recoverable	(415,677)	(32,311)		70,535
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(15,388,898)	(1,172,355)		(875,278)
Investing Activities
Mineral property acquisition costs	(999,844)	(100,000)		-
Acquisition of equipment	(61,918)			-
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	(1,061,762)	(100,000)		-
Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock - net	17,954,482	-		-
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities	17,954,482	-		-
Increase (Decrease) in Cash	1,503,822	(1,272,355)		(875,278)
Cash and cash equivalents – Beginning of Period	-	2,776,177		4,395,758
Cash and cash equivalents – End of Period	1,503,822	1,503,822		3,520,030
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
Issuance of common stock for mineral properties	3,838,850	-		375,000
Issuance of common stock for services	5,423,625	425,000		595,000
Supplemental Disclosure
Interest paid	-	-		-
Interest received Income taxes paid	640,278 -	5,414 -		13,045 -

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements

F-3

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

1.

Exploration Stage Company

The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 1, 2004 and reincorporated in the State of Minnesota on May 14, 2008.  The Company is an Exploration Stage Company, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No.7 "Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises" (Accounting Standards Collection ("ASC") Topic - 915).  In fiscal 2008 the Company incorporated Uranium Star (Mauritius) Ltd., a subsidiary in the country of Mauritius and Uranium Star Madagascar Sarl, a subsidiary in the country of Madagascar.  The Company's principal business is the acquisition and exploration of mineral resources.  The Company has not presently determined whether its properties contain mineral reserves that are economically recoverable.

These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.  The Company has never generated revenue from mining operations since inception and has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to pay dividends or generate earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future.  The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, confirmation of the Company's interests in the underlying properties, and the attainment of profitable operations.  As at September 30, 2009, the Company has accumulated losses of $38,581,328 since inception.  These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  These consolidated interim financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a)

Principals of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Uranium Star Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Uranium Star (Mauritius) Ltd., THB Venture Ltd, Uranium Star Madagascar Sarl and Uranium Star Minerals Sarl.  All inter company accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.  These interim consolidated financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars.  The Company's fiscal year end is June 30.

b)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

c)

Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share

The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share".  SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement.  Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period.  Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if converted method.  In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants.  Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.  Basi c and diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted EPS and the weighted average number of common shares exclude all dilutive potential shares since their effect is anti-dilutive.  Shares underlying these securities totaled approximately 16,913,000 as of September 30, 2009.

F - 4

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

d)

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" (ASC Topic - 220), establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances.  As at September 30, 2009, the Company's only component of other comprehensive income is unrealized losses on marketable securities.

e)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

f)

Marketable Securities

The Company classifies and accounts for debt and equity securities in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board FASB No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" (ASC Topic - 320).  The Company has classified all of its marketable securities as available for sale, thus securities are recorded at fair market value and any associated unrealized gain or loss, net of tax, is included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.”

g)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated amortization, and consists of computer hardware and exploration equipment.  Amortization of computer hardware is computed using the straight-line method over three years and exploration equipment is amortized over five years on a straight-line basis.

h)

Mineral Property Costs

The Company has been in the exploration stage since its inception on March 1, 2004, and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations.  It is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties. Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred.  Mineral property acquisition costs are initially capitalized when incurred using the guidance in EITF 04 02, "Whether Mineral Rights Are Tangible or Intangible Assets" (ASC Topic - 930).  The Company assesses the carrying costs for impairment under SFAS 144, "Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets" (ASC Topic - 360) at each fiscal quarter end.  When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs then incurred to develop such property, are capitalized.  Such costs will be amortized using the units of production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve.  If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to operations.

i)

Long Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC Topic - 360, the carrying value of intangible assets and other long lived assets is reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment.  The Company recognizes impairment  when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset.  Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value.

j)

Financial Instruments

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, amounts receivable, and accounts payable were estimated to approximate their carrying values due to the immediate or short term maturity of these financial instruments.  The Company's operations are in Canada and Madagascar which results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates.  The financial risk is the risk to the Company's operations that arise from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates.  Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.

F - 5

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

k)

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company's functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar.  Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated in accordance with SFAS No. 52 "Foreign Currency Translation" (ASC Topic - 830), using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date.  Gains and losses arising on settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income.  Foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in Canadian dollars and Malagasy ariary.

l)

Stock Based Compensation

 Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R "Share Based Payments" (ASC Topic - 718), using the modified retrospective transition method.  The Company had not issued any stock options or share based payments prior to January 1, 2006.  Accordingly, there was no effect on the Company's reported loss from operations, cash flows or loss per share as a result of adopting ASC Topic - 718.

m)

Income Taxes

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not.  The Company has adopted SFAS No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes" (ASC Topic - 740) as of its inception.  Pursuant to ASC Topic - 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward.  Potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these consolidated interim financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

At September 30, 2009,  the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits.  Management does not believe unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change within twelve months of the reporting date.  Interest and penalties related to income tax matters are recognized in income tax expense.  As of September 30, 2009 there is no accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions.

n)

Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year or for any future period.

F - 6

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

o)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Beginning July 1, 2008, the Company partially applied FAS 157 (ASC Topic - 820) as allowed by FASB Staff Position ("FSP") 157-2 (ASC Topic - 820 - 10), which delayed the effective date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities.  As of July 1, 2008 the Company has applied the provisions of ASC Topic - 820 to its financial instruments and the impact was not material.  On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC Topic - 820 to its non-financial assets and liabilities.  The addition did not have a material impact on the Financial Statements.

The Company primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavors to utilize the best available information.  Accordingly, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  The Company is able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs.

ASC Topic - 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by ASC Topic - 820 are as follows:

Level 1  Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.  Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.  Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, listed equities and U.S. government treasury securities.

Level 2  Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.  Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies.  These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.  Instruments in this cate gory include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as over the counter forwards, options and repurchase agreements.

Level 3  Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources.  These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management's best estimate of fair value from the perspective of a market participant. Level 3 instruments include those that may be more structured or otherwise tailored to customers' needs.  At each balance sheet date, the Company performs an analysis of all instruments subject to ASC Topic - 820 and includes in Level 3 all of those whose fair value is based on significant unobservable inputs.

Marketable securities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis based on a level one measurement.

F - 7

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

o)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In May 2008, the FASB issued new guidance, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”.  The guidance identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP.  SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”.  The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of the guidance.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (ASC Topic - 260 - 10).  FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing income per share under the two-class method pursuant to ASC Topic - 260, “Earnings per Share”.  This guidance establishes that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.  ASC Topic - 260 - 10 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.  Furthermore, all prior period earnings per share data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively to conform to the provisions of ASC Topic - 260 - 10.  

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No.165, “Subsequent Events” (SFAS 165), which establishes accounting standards for recognition and disclosure of events that occurs after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. These standards are essentially similar to current accounting principles with few exceptions that do not result in a change in general practice. This SFAS is effective on a prospective basis for interim or accrual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted this pronouncement effective June 30, 2009, and the adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We have evaluated subsequent events through November 3, 2009, the date the interim consolidated financial statements were issued. See Note 8 for identified items.

F – 8

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

3.

Property and Equipment

			September 30,	June 30,
		Accumulated	2009	2009
	Cost	Amortization	Net carrying value
	$	$	$	$
Computer equipment	2,001	2,001	-	-
Exploration equipment	44,445	22,222	22,223	24,445
	46,446	24,223	22,223	24,445

4.

Related Party Balances/Transactions

a)

During the three months ended September 30, 2009,  the Company incurred a total of $9,794 (2008: $10,500) in office administration and rent expense from a company related by common management.

b)

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, 725,000 stock options were granted (2008:  Nil) to directors, officers and a relative of a director.

c)

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, 1,875,000 (2008: Nil) shares were issued to directors, officers and a relative of a director for services at a fair value of $318,750. These common shares were valued at an estimated fair market value of $0.17 per share.

d)

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company incurred a total of $96,335 (2008: $77,715) in administrative, management and consulting fees to directors, officers and a relative of a director.

5.

Mineral Properties

a)

The Company entered into a binding letter of intent dated May 2, 2006, for an option to acquire a 75% interest in 200 claims located in northern Quebec, Canada.  The vendor has the right and option to sell an additional 25% undivided interest in the property.  This agreement is subject to a royalty agreement dated May 27, 1992, as amended November 3, 1993.  The vendor had acquired a 100% interest in the property, subject to a 1% net smelter royalty (NSR) on certain claims, and a 0.5% NSR on other claims.  The vendor has the right to buy back half of the 1% NSR for $200,000 and half of the 0.5% NSR for $100,000.  In order to exercise its option, the Company must issue 2,000,000 shares of common stock  and 2,000,000 warrants, exercisable at $1.00 per share on or before June 1, 2009; and incur aggregate exploration expenditures in the amount of $2,000,000 on the property on or before August 31, 2008 (the “Earn In” period).  The Company has issued the 2,000,000 shares of common stock and warrants relating to the agreement, and incurred aggregate exploration expenditures of $6,789,765 as at September 30, 2009.

 During the Earn In period, the vendor will have the additional option to sell its remaining 25% for 1,000,000 common shares and 1,000,000 warrants of the Company.  On February 28, 2007, the vendor exercised the option to sell the remaining 25% interest in the property.  As such the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $1,219,000 and 1,000,000 warrants valued at $752,985.

F - 9

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

5.

Mineral Properties   (continued)

b)

On August 15, 2006, the Company acquired an additional nineteen mineral claims contiguous to the property in consideration for a payment of $5,385 (CAD$6,000) as an acquisition fee, 150,000 common shares valued at $103,500 and 75,000 warrants valued at $34,961.  These shares and warrants were issued on October 4, 2006.  During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $143,846, as it had not yet been determined whether there were proven or probable reserves on the property.  As at  September 30, 2009, the cumulative impairment loss is $143,846.

c)

On August 22, 2007, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Madagascar Minerals and Resources Sarl ("MMR"), a company incorporated under the laws of Madagascar.  The joint venture is established with the Company owning a 75% undivided interest and MMR the remaining 25% interest.  The consideration paid to MMR to acquire the 75% stake in the joint venture consists of a signing fee of $15,000, a payment of $750,000, and the issuance of 1,250,000 common shares and 500,000 share purchase warrants of the Company all within 30 days of the properties vesting in the joint venture.  Each share purchase warrant is exercisable at $1.00 per share for a period of 2 years from the date of issuance.  On December 10, 2007, the Company issued 1,250,000 common shares valued at $375,000 based on the prevailing quoted market price of $0.30 per share and 500,000 share purchase w arrants valued at $60,560 using the Black-Scholes pricing model.  In the event a shareholder's shareholding is diluted below 10% the remaining shareholding will be exchanged for a 2% net smelter return ("NSR").  The NSR may be acquired by the remaining shareholder at a price of $1,000,000 in cash or shares of the Company for the first 1% and at a price of $1,500,000 in cash or shares of the Company for the second 1%.

On July 9, 2009 the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the remaining 25% interest of the “Three Horses Joint Venture” for a cash consideration of $100,000. On acquisition of the remaining 25% interest, the joint venture with MMR was terminated.  MMR retains a 2% net smelter return ("NSR").  The NSR on this 25% interest portion may be acquired by the Company at a price of $500,000 in cash or shares of the Company for the first 1% and at a price of $1,000,000 in cash or shares of the Company for the second 1% at the option of the Company.

The properties vesting in the joint venture are comprised of mineral permits consisting of 36 "squares" with each square representing approximately 6.25 sq. kilometers.  The properties are located in the District of Toliara and are referenced as TN 12,306, P(R); TN 12,814, P(R); TN 12,887 P(R); TN 12,888 P(R); TN 13,020 P(R); TN 13,021 P(R) as issued by the Bureau de Cadastre Minier de Madagascar ("BCMM") pursuant to the Mining Code 1999 (as amended) and its implementing decrees.

As at September 30, 2009, the Company recognized a cumulative impairment loss of $1,300,560, as it has not yet been determined whether there are proven or probable reserves on the property.

F - 10

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

6.

Common Stock

a)

On January 27, 2009, the Company issued 2,500,000 common shares to directors, officers and consultants as compensation for services rendered at a fair value of $250,000.  The shares were valued at an estimated fair market value of $0.10 per share based on the prevailing quoted market price on the date of issue.

b)

On April 21, 2009, the Company issued 1,600,000 common shares to directors, officers and consultants as compensation for services rendered at a fair value of $128,000. The shares were valued at an estimated fair market value of $0.08 per share based on the prevailing quoted market price on the date of issue.

c)

On June 24, 2009, the Company issued 750,000 common shares and 375,000 share purchase warrants valued at $131,924 to a new director and to a special advisory member to the Board of Directors as incentive bonus for their current and future services. The share purchase warrants issued are exercisable at $0.20 per  share  for a period of two years from the date of issuance.

d)

Between June 15, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the Company closed a private placement comprising of 6,800,000 units for gross proceeds of $680,000. Each unit consists of one common share  and one-half share purchase warrant . Each warrant is exercisable at $0.20 per share for a period of two years from date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, the Company paid 408,000 common shares and 408,000 broker warrants valued at $0.10 per unit as commission. Each broker warrant is exercisable at $0.10 per share for a period of 2 years from the date of issuance.

e)

On August 17, 2009, the Company issued 2,500,000 common shares to directors, officers and consultants as compensation for services rendered at a fair value of $425,000. The shares were valued at an estimated fair market value of $0.17 per share based on the prevailing quoted market price on the date of issue.

F - 11

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

7.

Stock Options and Warrants

(i)

Stock Options

Effective March 8, 2006, the Company filed a Form S 8 Registration Statement in connection with its newly adopted 2006 Stock Option Plan ("the "2006 Plan") allowing for the direct award of shares or granting of stock options to acquire up to a total of 2,000,000 common shares.  On December 18, 2006 and February 16, 2007, the Stock Option Plan was amended to increase the stock option pool by an additional 8,000,000 common shares.  The Company granted 875,000 stock options during the three months ended September 30, 2009.  

The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company's stock options:

	Number of Options	Weighted average exercise price
		$
Outstanding, June 30, 2008	8,955,000	0.63
Cancelled	(1,325,000)	0.66
Outstanding, June 30 2009	7,630,000	0.15
Granted	875,000	0.35
Outstanding, September 30, 2009	8,505,000	0.17

Additional information regarding options outstanding as at September 30, 2009 is as follows:

Exercise price	Number of shares	Outstanding Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)	Weighted average exercise price	Exercisable
				Number of shares	Weighted average exercise price
$0.15	515,000	1.83	$0.15	515,000	$0.15
$0.15	1,025,000	2.16	$0.15	1,025,000	$0.15
$0.15	2,570,000	2.45	$0.15	2,570,000	$0.15
$0.15	3,520,000	2.78	$0.15	3,520,000	$0.15
$0.35	875,000	3.75	$0.35	875,000	$0.35
	8,505,000		$0.17	8,505,000	$0.17

On April 21, 2009 the Company re-priced the 7,630,000 outstanding stock options by amending the exercise price ranging between $0.55 to $0.85 per share to $0.15 per share. The Company recorded stock based compensation expense of $128,328  resulting from the modification.

The weighted average assumptions used are as follows:

	September 30, 2009	June 30, 2009
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%
Risk-free interest rate	1.8%	1.02% - 1.37%
Expected volatility	157%	141% - 155%
Expected option life (in years)	4	0.03 – 2.08

F - 12

Uranium Star Corp.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2009

(Expressed in US dollars)

(Unaudited)

7.

Stock Options and Warrants

(ii)

Warrants

The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company's warrants:

	Number of             Warrants	Weighted average    exercise price  ($)
Outstanding June 30, 2008	39,294,250	0.78
Granted	4,183,000	0.19
Expired	(35,069,250)	0.76
Outstanding, June 30, 2009 & September 30, 2009	8,408,000	0.23

At September 30, 2009, the following share purchase warrants were outstanding:

Number of warrants		Exercise Price ($)	Expiry Date
75,000		1.00	October 4, 2009
500,000		1.00	December 10, 2009
3,650,000	(a)	0.15	April 26, 2010
3,400,000		0.20	June 15 – 30, 2011
408,000		0.10	June 30, 2011
375,000		0.20	June 24, 2011
8,408,000

a)

On April 21, 2009, the Company amended the 3,650,000 warrants issued to directors, officers and consultants on April 26, 2006.  The exercise price was re priced from $0.50 per share to $0.15 per share with an expiry date of April 26, 2010.

8.

Subsequent Event

On October 5, 2009 the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock and 250,000 share purchase warrants to a director as incentive bonus compensation. In addition, 250,000 shares of common stock previously issued to a director were cancelled.

F-13

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, “Company,” “our company,” “us,” and “our” refer to Uranium Star Corp., unless the context requires otherwise.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Certain statements included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements related to anticipated cash flow sources and uses, and words including but not limited to “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “expects”, “future” and similar statements or expressions, identify forward looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:  (a) projections of our revenues, capital expenditures, growth, prospects, dividends, capital structure and other financial matters; (b) statements of our plans and objectives; (c) statements of our future economic performance; (d) statements of assumptions underlying other statements and statements about us and our business relating to the future; and (e) any statements using the words "believes," "budget," "target," "goal," "antic ipate," "expect," "plan," "outlook," "objective," "may," "project," "intend," "estimate," or similar expressions. Any forward-looking statements herein are subject to certain risks and uncertainties in the business of Uranium Star Corp. including but not limited to, reliance on key customers and competition in its markets, market demand, product performance, technological developments, maintenance of relationships with key suppliers, difficulties of hiring or retaining key personnel and any changes in current accounting rules, all of which may be beyond the control of our company. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth therein.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included herein. Further, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the our Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements included in its 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 21, 2009.

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.  We urge you to read this report in conjunction with the risk factors described herein.   

BACKGROUND

Company Overview

Uranium Star Corp. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 1, 2004 and reincorporated in the State of Minnesota on May 14, 2008. Our fiscal year-end is June 30. We are an exploration stage company engaged in the search for uranium, gold and other minerals.  We have an interest in properties located in Canada (Province of Québec) and Madagascar.  None of the properties in which we hold an interest has known mineral reserves of any kind at this time.  As such, the work programs planned by us are exploratory in nature.

We have not had any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceeding since incorporation. There have been no material reclassifications, mergers, consolidations or purchases or sales of any significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of business since the date of incorporation.

2

Business Development

UNTIL WE CAN VALIDATE OTHERWISE, THE PROPERTIES OUTLINED BELOW HAVE NO KNOWN MINERAL RESERVES OF ANY KIND AND WE ARE PLANNING PROGRAMS THAT ARE EXPLORATORY IN NATURE.  Further details regarding our  properties, although not incorporated by reference, including the comprehensive geological report prepared in compliance with Canada’s National Instrument 43-101 on our Sagar property in Northern Quebec can be found on our website:  www.uraniumstar.com. The comprehensive geological report prepared in compliance with Canada’s National Instrument 43-101 on our Three Horses Property located in Madagascar has been submitted to the SEC and TSX for approval.

Competitive Conditions

The mineral exploration and mining industry is competitive in all phases of exploration, development and production. We compete with a number of other entities and individuals in the search for, and acquisition of, attractive mineral properties. As a result of this competition, the majority of which is with companies with greater financial resources than us, we may not in the future be able to acquire attractive properties on terms it considers acceptable.  Furthermore, we compete with other resource companies, many of whom have greater financial resources and/or more advanced properties that are better able to attract equity investments and other capital.  Factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of minerals mined or discovered by us.

Sagar Property:  Romanet Horst, Labrador Trough, Québec, Canada

Property Description and Location

The Sagar Property comprises 219 blocks of claims in the Territory of Nunavik, Province of Québec, Canada.  The approximate center of exploration activity is circa 56°22’ N latitude and circa 68° 00’ W longitude.  Details on the individual claims are available on-line at the Government of Québec’s Ministère des Resources Naturelles et de la Faune GESTIM website at https://gestim.mines.gouv.qc.ca.

The area comprising these claims is approximately 6,580 hectares.  In this part of the Province of Québec, claim outlines are predetermined by “map staking.”  Previously staked claims are superimposed upon by the map-staking grid, producing some of the small parcels. There are no carried environmental liabilities on the property. All surface work requires provincial government permits, including camp construction permits. These have been acquired.

Agreement

On May 4, 2006, Virginia Mines Inc. (“Virginia”) and our company entered into a binding agreement whereby we were granted an option to acquire an undivided 75% participating interest in 200 claims constituting the Sagar Property located in the Labrador Trough in Northern Québec.  Under the terms of this agreement, we had the option to earn a 75% interest in the Sagar Property by issuing to Virginia 2,000,000 of our common shares and 2,000,000 of our common share purchase warrants, each warrant entitling Virginia to acquire one of our common shares at a price of US$1.00 for a period of three years from the date of issue thereof, and by incurring total exploration expenditures of $2,000,000 on the Sagar Property by August 2008.  Furthermore,

3

Virginia had the option, at any time, to sell its remaining 25% participating interest in the Sagar Property in consideration for the issue to it of 1,000,000 of our common shares and 1,000,000 our of common share purchase warrants.  The common share purchase warrants shall be exercisable at a price equal to the 20-trading day weighted average closing price preceding the selling date, and shall be valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance.  Upon our earning a 100% interest in the Sagar Property, Virginia shall retain a 1.5% royalty (NSR).  In the event of a gold discovery on the Sagar Property with an NI 43-101 indicated resource of no less than 500,000 ounces, Virginia shall be entitled to exercise a back-in right to re-acquire a 51% interest in the Sagar Property by making a cash payment or issuing common shares equivalent to an amount equal to 250% of the expenditures incurred by us on the Sagar Property a t such time.  Upon the exercise of such back-in right, Virginia would become the operator of the Sagar Property.

On February 19, 2007, Virginia exercised its option to sell its 25% remaining interest in the Sagar Property to us and in connection therewith, we issued to Virginia 1,000,000 of our common shares and 1,000,000 of our common share purchase warrants, with each such warrant being exercisable at a price of $1.24 for a period of two years from the date of issuance. As a result of this exercise, we now holds a 100% interest in the Sagar Property, subject to a royalty equal to 1% of net smelter returns on certain claims 0.5% on net smelter returns on other claims owned by Pierre Poisson and Joanne Jones (the "P&J Royalty") (see below), and a royalty in favour of Virginia equal to 1.5% of net smelter returns. Under the agreement with Virginia, we must incur aggregate exploration expenditures of at least $2,000,000 on the Sagar Property on or before August 31, 2008.

The agreement with Virginia is subject to a royalty agreement dated May 27, 1992 (as amended by agreements dated May 10, 1993 and November 3, 1993, collectively, the "Virginia Royalty Agreement") between Virginia Gold Mines Inc. (predecessor to Virginia) and Pierre Poisson and Joanne Jones.  Pursuant to the Virginia Royalty Agreement, Virginia acquired a 100% interest in the Sagar Property, subject to the P&J Royalties.  Pursuant to the Virginia Royalty Agreement, Virginia had the right to buy back half of the 1% net smelter return royalty (0.5%) for $200,000, and half of the 0.5% net smelter return royalty (0.25%) for $100,000, such P&J Royalty repurchase are now held by us.

As at September 30, 2009, we incurred an aggregate of $6,789,765 of exploration expenditures on the Sagar Property.

We are currently up to date with all obligations required to maintain the property in good standing.

FERDERBER CLAIMS

Property Description and Location

Uranium Star has acquired a 100% undivided right, title and interest in and to 19 mining claims (0036315, 0036316, 0036317, 0036318, 0036319, 0036320, 0036321, 0036322, 0036323, 0036324, 0036325, 0036326, 0036327, 0030649, 0030650, 0030640, 0030638, 0030612, 0030613) held by Mr. Peter Ferderber, covering an area of approximately 64 hectares located in the Central Labrador Trough Region of Québec, 13 of which are contiguous to our Sagar Property.

4

In consideration of our receiving a 100% interest in these claims (free and clear of all encumbrances), subject to any net smelter return royalties, we paid Cdn$6,000, and issued 150,000 shares of our common stock and a warrant exercisable for 75,000 of our common shares, exercisable at $1.00 for a three year period from date of issuance.

Underlying Royalty (NSR)

Mr. Ferderber retains a 1% net smelter return royalty on this property and agreed that we shall have a first right of refusal to purchase the 1% net smelter return royalty should Mr. Ferderber, at his sole discretion, elect to sell the royalty.

Sagar Property and Ferderber Claims Highlights

The following are key features of the Sagar Property:

The geological setting of the property is the northwest trending Romanet Horst within the Labrador Trough. The significant mineral potential of this geological setting is well demonstrated by the abundance and diversity of uranium-gold showings, which range from veins to breccia’s to shear zones. There is also locally significant sedimentary-hosted copper mineralization. The most spectacular mineralization found to date is the 500 x 200 meter Mistamisk boulder field which contains 150 boulders that range up to 640 g/t gold and 4.11% uranium, with 70 tested boulders averaging 64.9g/t gold and 1.3% uranium. The boulders discovered within the Mistamisk boulder field range in length from 0.30 to 2.0 metres. Previous work has not determined the bedrock source of this boulder field.

Copper mineralization has been defined in a number of locations, the most significant being the Dehli-Pacific showing, which has reported 4.2% copper over 7.6 meters within a drill hole that intersected a shear zone along a sediment-gabbro contact.

We are currently up to date with all obligations required to maintain our option in good standing.

MADAGASCAR PROPERTY

Property Description and Location

The Madagascar properties are comprised of mineral permits consisting of 36 “squares”, each square representing approximately 6.25 sq. kilometers. The properties are located in the District of Toliara and are referenced as TN 12,306,P(R); TN 12,814, P(R); TN 12,887 P(R); TN 12,888 P(R); TN 13,020 P(R); TN 13,021 P(R) as issued by the Bureau de Cadastre Minier de Madagascar (“BCMM”) pursuant to the Mining Code 1999 (as amended) and its implementing decrees.

5

Three Horses Property Boundary

(blue lines are creeks, red lines are property boundary, black lines are seasonal tracks)

6

Agreement

On August 22, 2007, we entered into a joint venture agreement with Madagascar Minerals and Resources sarl, a company incorporated under the laws of Madagascar. The joint venture, to be known as the “Three Horses Joint Venture”, will be operated through a Madagascar limited liability company in which we will own a 75% undivided interest and Madagascar Minerals will own the remaining 25% interest. The consideration paid to Madagascar Minerals to acquire the 75% stake in the joint venture consisted of:

(i)

a signing fee of $15,000 within 15 days of the properties vesting in the joint venture;

(ii)

a payment of $750,000 within 15 days of the properties vesting in the joint venture  and

(iii)

the issuance of 1,250,000 of our common shares and 500,000 of our share purchase warrants within 30 days of the properties vesting in the company created for the joint venture under Madagascar law. Each share purchase warrant is exercisable at $1.00 per share for a period of 2 years from the date of issuance.

In the event that a joint venture party’s interest in the joint venture is diluted below 10%, then that interest will be exchanged with the majority shareholder for a 2% net smelter return.  Furthermore, that royalty may be acquired by the remaining joint venture party as follows:

(i)

the 1^st 1% at US$1,000,000 in cash or our common shares; and

(ii)

the 2^nd  1% at US$ 1,500,000 in cash or our common shares;

both at the option of the remaining shareholder.

On July 9, 2009 our company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the remaining 25% interest of the “Three Horses Joint Venture” for cash consideration of $100,000. On acquisition of the remaining 25% the joint venture with MMR was terminated.  MMR retains a 2% net smelter return ("NSR").  The NSR on this 25% interest portion may be acquired by us at a price of $500,000 in cash or shares of our common stock for the first 1% and at a price of $1,000,000 in cash or shares of our common stock for the second 1% at our option.

Exploration Program.

The Three Horses Property, consisting of 31 squares, covering an area of approximately 194 square kilometres, displays extensive gossan outcroppings at surface. An examination of part of the Three Horse Property revealed several large areas covered with gossanous boulders which are believed to overlie massive sulphide mineralization. We conducted a first phase of exploration from September to November 2007 for the Three Horses Joint Venture which included: road maintenance, camp construction, data acquisition, an airborne geophysical survey, geological mapping, stream sediment sampling, prospecting and mechanical trenching.

All phases of the exploration project are managed by Taiga Consultants of Calgary.

In the latter part of March 2008 to June 2008 a full field exploration program following up on the airborne geophysical survey and results of the 2007 exploration program was implemented. This included geological mapping, prospecting, ground geophysical surveys and geochemical sampling.

7

 Diamond drilling of 31 holes was carried out from October – November 24th, 2008. Extensive mechanical trenching was carried out in the first half of 2009.

Plan of Operation

Our plan of operations for the period until December 31, 2009 is to complete the following objectives within the time periods specified, subject to our obtaining the necessary funding and/or permits for continued exploration of the mineral properties. The following table, although subject to revision, summarizes the anticipated exploration expenditures on our current properties for the period until December 31, 2010.

	2009	2010
Sagar Project (incl. Ferderber Claims)	$20,000	$20,000
Madagascar	$2,600,000	$10,000,000
Other	$20,000	$20,000
Totals	$2,640,000	$10,040,000

Madagascar Properties

Prior to the exploration work completed by Uranium Star in 2007 and 2008 there is no record of any previous mining or significant exploration activity within the Three Horses Property area. There is evidence locally of minor artisanal working and small exploratory pits for gems and gold by the local population.

Taiga Consultants Ltd. was retained by Uranium Star to manage exploration activities on the Three Horses Property in the summer and fall of 2007 and throughout 2008.

In 2007 Taiga began a grass roots exploration program with the goal of determining the potential of finding economic VMS and/or gold mineralization on the property. The program consisted of the following on the property:

a)

Stream Sediment sampling over the majority of the property area (182 samples)

b)

Reconnaissance geological mapping over the entire property and detailed geological mapping over selected stratigraphic horizons

c)

Prospecting over selected target areas (126 grab samples and 100 whole rock grab samples)

d)

Soil sampling over selected target areas (1684 samples)

e)

Limited trenching over selected targets (11 trenches over 525.5 metres)

f)

Construction of a cinder block base camp at Fotadrevo

g)

Construction of a one kilometre long gravel surfaced airstrip at Fotadrevo

h)

Repair and surfacing of the access road from base camp to the airstrip

i)

Remote Sensing interpretation using DEM, Landsat, Aster data

j)

Airborne DIGHEM V multi frequency EM and magnetometer survey over the entire property (7856 km) at 100 meter line spacing

8

In 2008 ground exploration continued with additional geological mapping, prospecting, rock soil and stream sediment geochemical sampling, trenching and ground geophysics, as well as diamond drilling. Again the primary target was VMS mineralization. While no significant intersections of sulphides were encountered, it became apparent through the use of a portable XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence analysis) instrument that there was potential for significant vanadium mineralization to be defined.

Thirty one (31) diamond drill holes, TH-08-01 to TH-08-31, comprising 4073.3 meters (13,364 feet) of diamond drilling were completed from October 7 to November 20, 2008 on the Three Horses Property. The objective of the drill program was to investigate several geochemical, geophysical, and/or geological targets defined during the course of exploration programs completed on the property.

9

2008 Diamond Drill Hole Locations

10

                             Composited Vanadium Mineralization in 2008 Drill Holes

Hole	Depth in Metres			V2O5
	From	To	Interval	%
TH-08-01	103.6	115.8	12.2	0.39
TH-08-02	42.7	109.7	36.6	0.27
incl.	100.6	109.7	9.1	0.36
TH-08-07	27.4	54.9	27.4	0.23
TH-08-11	33.5	39.6	6.1	0.41
TH-08-11	57.9	76.2	18.3	0.37
TH-08-12	30.6	114.3	83.7	0.37
incl.	45.7	61.0	15.2	0.40
incl.	86.9	109.7	22.9	0.47
TH-08-13	38.5	141.7	103.2	0.32
incl.	76.2	141.7	65.5	0.36
incl.	112.8	141.7	27.4	0.45
TH-08-14	12.2	109.7	97.5	0.35
incl.	76.2	91.4	15.2	0.66
TH-08-24	4.6	82.3	77.7	0.67
incl.	12.2	61.0	45.7	0.91
TH-08-25	18.3	48.8	30.5	0.32
TH-08-25	100.6	103.6	3.0	0.47
TH-08-26	9.1	36.6	27.4	0.41
incl.	18.3	27.4	9.0	0.76
TH-08-26	67.1	73.2	6.1	0.53
TH-08-27	9.1	97.5	88.4	0.30
incl.	18.3	29.0	10.7	0.88
TH-08-27	146.3	153.9	6.0	0.50
TH-08-31	15.2	51.8	36.6	0.38
incl.	36.6	48.8	12.2	0.56

In the spring of 2009 a detailed hand-held XRF survey of soils and follow up trenching was undertaken. The goal was to define areas of interest with the XRF instrumentation. These areas of interest would then be trenched and channel samples collected and submitted to a recognized laboratory for conventional analyses.

In early 2009 it was felt that the vanadiferous trends were not sufficiently well understood in terms of their areal extent and also because of the lack of sampling in the weathered zone by the 2008 drilling, little was known about the distribution of vanadium near surface. It was felt that additional information was needed to trace the trends to allow for efficient and economical testing in future diamond drilling programs. The most favorable survey was considered to be shallow machine trenching, however, given the fact that in the weathered zone the vanadium mineralization is difficult to identify by eye and the exact location and width of the trends were not known a means was required to

11

identify in the field the location and tenor of the vanadium mineralization to minimize the cost and disturbance resulting from trenching. Given the previous encouraging experience with X-Ray Fluorescence analysis of vanadium used on the drill core in 2008 this technique was chosen to allow for in field grade control. It is cautioned that the XRF analysis method is not a substitute for actual rock sampling and proper laboratory analysis and so the reader is advised that XRF data should only be taken as a rough indication of the elemental content of the rock being analyzed and not as a precise measurement of the amount of vanadium in the rock. The trenches were also channel sampled and those samples are being sent to a reputable laboratory in Australia for final analysis.

In the first half of 2009 a total of 56 trenches with a combined length of 8,168m have been completed. Trenches were completed in the Jaky, Mainty, Manga and Fondrana Zones. The layout of the trenches in the Mainty and Jaky Zones was designed to test for extensions of the surface extent of vanadium mineralization found in the 2008 drill holes into these areas. Trenches in the Manga Zone were located to test the regional structure, which joins the Mainty and Jaky Zones.

2009 Trench Location Map

12

Trenching was completed by a 28 ton Komatsu backhoe, a 22-ton backhoe and a small wheeled backhoe was utilized for backfilling and trenching.

The XRF method of analysis appears to serve best as a tool for locating and prioritizing target areas for detailed follow up exploration and so is considered by our management as an excellent tool to allow vectoring over mineralized areas.

In the case of the Jaky Zone the anomalous vanadium values, which define the zone, extend for over 1.1 km and for the Mainty Zone for at least one kilometre. The width of the zone defined by the XRF readings is also in excess of that seen in the sub-surface. Portions of the Jaky Zone are over 200 wide and for the Mainty Zone over 100m wide. It is felt that the XRF data is sufficient to map the areal extent of the mineralized zones. The exact tenor of the mineralization is confirmed by the assay results of the channel sampling completed in the trenches.

Trench #	From	To	Length	% V2O5
TR-09-001	0	116	116	0.48
incl.	28	52	24	0.72
incl.	70	90	20	0.77
TR-09-002	54	136	190	0.56
incl	104	136	32	0.96
incl.	154	208	54	0.67
TR-09-003	58	134	192	0.47
incl.	86	152	66	0.8
TR-09-004	84	200	116	0.5
incl.	112	164	52	0.75
TR-09-005	26	62	36	0.23
TR-09-006	28	74	46	0.36
TR-09-007	8	100	92	0.27
TR-09-008	40	106	66	0.40
Incl.	44	70	26	0.55
TR-09-009	24	84	60	0.25
TR-09-010	106	152	46	0.31
Tr-09-011	0	30	30	0.36
TR-09-012	4	34	30	0.41
TR-09-013	84	140	56	0.25
TR-09-014	-14	32	46	0.38
incl.	-8	4	12	0.68
TR-09-015	52	92	40	0.26
TR-09-016	44	88	44	0.27
incl.	44	50	6	0.58
TR-09-017	134	152	18	0.38
TR-09-018	22	30	8	0.49
and	86	122	36	0.51
TR-09-19	138	204	66	0.46
incl.	158	180	22	0.59
TR-09-020	24	104	80	0.31

13

TR-09-021	32	57	25	0.36
TR-09-022	26	100	74	0.38
TR-09-023	24	72	48	0.34
TR-09-024				NSV
TR-09-025	66	74	8	0.27
TR-09-026	2	138	136	0.21
TR-09-027	6	58	52	0.23
TR-09-028	40	54	14	0.33
and	78	100	22	0.53
TR-09-029	56	94	38	0.36
TR-09-030	74	92	18	0.68
TR-09-031	20	36	16	0.52
TR-09-032	54	100	46	0.46
TR-09-033	18	62	44	0.44
incl.	18	28	10	0.59
TR-09-034	40	86	46	0.44
incl.	54	64	10	0.74
TR-09-035	20	64	44	0.43
TR-09-036	8	52	44	0.47
incl.	26	36	10	0.60
TR-09-037	6	62	56	0.49
incl.	8	28	20	0.70
TR-09-038	64	212	148	0.57
incl.	68	82	14	0.65
incl.	104	118	14	0.99
incl.	148	208	60	0.71
TR-09-039	38	242	204	0.51
incl.	146	190	44	0.98
TR-09-40	8	104	96	0.44
incl.	8	70	62	0.57
TR-09-041	32	162	130	0.56
incl.	68	132	64	0.71
TR-09-042	62	162	100	0.47
incl.	122	160	38	0.61
TR-09-043	98	150	52	0.44
incl.	98	120	22	0.58
TR-09-044	36	84	48	0.48
incl.	62	84	22	0.66
TR-09-045	-50	-22	28	0.40
and	4	50	46	0.31
TR-09-046				NSV
TR-09-047				NSV
TR-09-048				NSV
TR-09-049	28	62	34	0.47
incl.	50	62	12	0.66
TR-09-050	16	78	62	0.48
incl.	60	78	18	0.76
TR-09-051	-28	32	60	0.40
TR-09-052	-4	48	52	0.45

14

incl.	22	34	12	0.65
TR-09-053	12	54	42	0.35
TR-09-054	46	132	86	0.57
incl.	70	134	64	0.68
and	176	216	40	0.27
TR-09-055	36	80	44	0.44
incl.	48	64	16	0.6
and	0	12	12	0.38
NSV = no significant values

15

Manga Zone Trenching and Assay Intervals

16

The tenor of vanadium encountered in drill core coupled with the areal extent of vanadium-bearing trends, indicates the Three Horses Property has the potential to host a significant vanadium deposit. The mineralized zones defined to date represent an 18-kilometer strike length of an interpreted single stratigraphic horizon, which our management  believes is continuously mineralized.

Assuming that the Jaky, Manga and Mainty Zones form a continuous strike length of 18+ kilometres that they are in the order of 50 meters wide and have been intersected by drilling to depths approaching 150 metres the following range of conservative tonnage estimates is postulated:

Strike length	6,000 m	12,000 m
Width	50 m	50 m
Depth	100 m	100 m
Specific Gravity	2.5 g/cc	2.5 g/cc
Potential tonnes	75 million	150 million

A significant amount of drilling will be required to confirm the above estimates. Subsequent exploration work should be geared towards developing a deposit model and generating a resource estimate.

Metallurgy

SGS Mineral Services completed preliminary metallurgical testing as described below

Generally the following observations can be made:

High free acid levels of 100 g/L H₂SO₄ led to higher V extraction in both samples than the test performed under 20 g/L H₂SO₄ conditions.

The tests performed with 100 g/L FA concentrations seem to continue leaching at 24 hrs (based on increasing extraction and decreasing residue assays.

Overall extraction of vanadium from the silicate sample is higher (78.2%) than from the oxide sample (69.9%).

Despite the higher extraction of vanadium from the silicate samples, acid consumption (using the 100 g/L series of tests) is generally lower with the silicate sample (179 kg/t) than with the oxide sample (250 kg/t). This can be attributed to higher co-extraction of acid consuming elements such as aluminum, magnesium and manganese.

17

It was observed that a precipitate formed in the filtrate of the Silicate Composite leaches if the pulp was filtered hot. These filtrate samples were filtered again and the precipitate from all of the filtrate samples was combined to be analysed. At 23% Ca this precipitate is presumed to be mainly gypsum.

Vanadium Extraction vs Time

Future Programs

The property merits an ambitious exploration program consisting of exploratory and infill diamond drilling over vanadium-bearing zones identified by diamond drilling in 2008 and in trenching completed in the first half of 2009. The goal of the program is to establish a vanadium resource in the Jaky and Mainty Zones at a minimum and to continue exploration on other less well-developed target areas mainly the Fondrana and Maitso Zones.

The economic potential of the property rests upon the ability to extract vanadium using reasonable, potentially economic parameters. We intend to carry out further larger sample

18

tests and more complete mineralogy and metallurgical testing of vanadium ores to establish the technological and economic parameters of vanadium processing. The goal of this work is to identify a potentially economic processing method to extract vanadium from both the silicate and oxide ore types, which are known to exist on the property.

We intend  to begin the collection of weather, environmental and social data that would be required in any engineering and socio-economic pre-feasibility study.

The recommended diamond drill program commenced in the first week of October 2009. An additional trenching program designed to define other vanadium bearing zones within close proximity to the known zone is also being undertaken. Additional samples have been sent to Mintek Laboratories in South Africa for additional metallurgical test work. A local environmental group has been retained to commence environmental and socio-economic studies.

The expected cost of the recommended program through to the end of 2010 is US$12,600,000.

Sagar Property, Quebec

Taiga Consultants Limited executed exploration programs on Uranium Star’s behalf in 2007.  Both programs utilized a refurbished exploration camp on the east shore of Lake Mistamisk, and were helicopter supported by Expedition Helicopters Inc.  The objective of both programs was to identify the source of the Mistamisk Boulder Field mineralization.  During the course of exploration activities, 46 diamond drill holes (DDH) over 5,610 metres, and 164 reverse circulation (RC) holes over 2,625 metres were drilled.  The RC holes were pattern drilled to try and establish a glacial transportation vector for the boulder field mineralization, while the DDH’s were drilled to test geophysical anomalies on the Sagar Property.  In addition to drilling, other exploration activities included prospecting of airborne geophysical targets, grid emplacement, ground magnetometer surveying, characterization of the lithogeochemic al signature of Mistamisk boulders, and soil sampling.

Future Programs

In light of empirical observations collected during the course of 2007 exploration activities, other targets have been identified which could prove to be volumetrically more significant than the source of the Mistamisk Boulder Field.  In order of priority, management believes future exploration on the Sagar Property should focus on the discovery of:

1.

Gold and uranium mineralization at redox boundaries along major faults. This work should focus on the intersection between the Romanet fault and the reducing lithologies of the Dunphy and Lace Lake formations.

19

2.

Unconformity associated polymetallic uranium-style mineralization at the Archean basement contact.  The ‘Kilo’ soil anomaly should be targeted for this exploration due to the anomalous soil, RC, and DDH geochemistry, as well as the numerous coincident geophysical anomalies.  

3.

Iron-Oxide Copper Gold (IOCG) mineralization.  This work should focus on the east-west structure bisecting the Romanet Horst.  In particular, the area to the south-west of the Lac Plisse showing should be drill tested as it has coincident gravity and magnetic highs, and has an anomalous IOCG-related geochemical signature for RC, soil, and water geochemical data. Additionally, the DDH geochemistry and alteration mineralogy observed from holes in the ‘Alpha’ soil target area should be re-examined in the context of IOCG mineralization.

4.

Source mineralization for the Mistamisk Boulder Field. The anomalous Alpha, Delta, and Kilo soil targets, as well as A, B, and E RC targets identified during the course of the 2007 exploration program should be examined to ascertain the source mineralization for the Mistamisk Boulder Field.  

Other Expenses

Management anticipates spending approximately $300,000 in ongoing general and administrative expenses per quarter for the next twelve months.  These general and administrative expenses will consist primarily of professional fees for the accounting, audit and legal work relating to our regulatory filings throughout the year, as well as transfer agent fees and general office expenses. However, the overall general and administration expenses will vary in direct proportion with the level of activity relating to future acquisitions and exploration programs.

Cautionary Note

Based on the nature of our business, we anticipate incurring operating losses in the foreseeable future. We base this expectation, in part, on the fact that very few mineral properties in the exploration stage ultimately develop into producing, profitable mines. Our future financial results are also uncertain due to a number of factors, some of which are outside our control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

- our ability to raise additional funding;

- the market price for gold;

- the market price for uranium;

- the results of our proposed exploration programs on our mineral properties; and

- our ability to find joint venture partners for the development of our property interests.

20

If we are successful in completing an equity financing, existing shareholders will experience dilution of their interest in our company. In the event we are not successful in raising additional financing, we anticipate that we will not be able to proceed with our business plan. In such a case, we may decide to discontinue our current business plan and seek other business opportunities in the resource sector. Any business opportunity would require our management to perform diligence on possible acquisition of additional resource properties. Such due diligence would likely include purchase investigation costs such as professional fees by consulting geologists, preparation of geological reports on the properties, conducting title searches and travel costs for site visits. It is anticipated that such costs will not be sufficient to acquire any resource property and additional funds will be required to close any po ssible acquisition.

During this period, we will need to maintain our periodic filings with the appropriate regulatory authorities and will incur legal and accounting costs. In the event no other such opportunities are available and we cannot raise additional capital to sustain operations, we may be forced to discontinue business. We do not have any specific alternative business opportunities in mind and have not planned for any such contingency.

Due to our lack of operating history and present inability to generate revenues, our auditors have stated their opinion that there currently exists substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Capital Financing

From inception to June 30, 2004, we raised $59,750 through the issuance of 9,585,000 common shares.

For the year ended June 30, 2005, we did not raise any new financing.

For the year ended June 30, 2006, we raised $795,250 through the issuance of 2,750,000 common shares and 2,265,000 share purchase warrants.

For the year ended June 30, 2007, we raised $17,300,000 through the issuance of 34,600,000 common shares and 29,000,250 share purchase warrants.

For the year ended June 30, 2008, we did not raise any new financing.

For the year ended June 30, 2009, we raised $680,000 through the issuance of 6,800,000 common shares and 3,400,000 share purchase warrants.

For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we did not raise any new financing.

We anticipates that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock.  However, the Company cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of common stock for additional phases of

21

exploration.  Our management believes that debt financing will not be an alternative for funding additional phases of exploration.  We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing.

Results of Operations

We have had no operating revenues from inception on March 1, 2004 through to the period ended September 30, 2009.  Our activities have been financed from the proceeds of share subscriptions.  From inception, on March 1, 2004, to September 30, 2009, we raised gross proceeds of $18,835,000 from private offerings of our securities.

For the period from inception, March 1, 2004, to September 30, 2009, we incurred a loss before income taxes of $38,581,328.  Expenses included $19,665,947 in mineral property and exploration costs.  These costs charged to operations were for the acquisition of the Sagar  Properties in Canada,  Madagascar properties, and other abandoned properties including ancillary costs related to the mineral properties.  We also incurred $1,803,298 in professional fees during the period. We had general and administrative expenses of $2,738,097; stock based compensation of $15,831,736, a foreign exchange translation gain of $572,065 and other income (including interest) of $944,131.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at September 30, 2009, we had cash on hand of $1,503,822.

Our company business has been funded to date through the sale of our common stock.

We hold a significant portion of cash reserves in Canadian dollars.  Due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the value of these Canadian dollar reserves can result in both translation gains or losses in US dollar terms.  If there was to be a significant decline in the Canadian dollar versus the US Dollar the US dollar cash position would also significantly decline.  We have not entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations.  Such foreign exchange declines could cause us to experience losses.

There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve further sales of common stock or any other form of additional financing.  If our company is unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue the plan of operations, then we will not be able to continue our exploration and our venture will fail.

Issuances of Securities

We have funded our business to date from sales of our common stock.  During the year ended June 30, 2009, we closed a private placement comprising of 6,800,000 units for gross proceeds of $680,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one-half share purchase warrant . Each warrant is exercisable at $0.20 per share for a period of two years from date of issuance. In connection with the private placement, we paid 408,000 shares of common stock  and 408,000 broker warrants valued at $0.10 per unit as commission. Each broker warrant is exercisable at $0.10 per share for a period of 2 years from the date of issuance.

All of these shares were issued to non-US investors pursuant to the exemption provided by Section 4 (2) under the Securities Act for a transaction not involving a public offering. The offer and sale of such shares of our common stock were effected in reliance on the exemptions for

22

sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, based on the following: (a) the investors confirmed to us that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act and had such background, education and experience in financial and business matters as to be able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the securities; (b) there was no public offering or general solicitation with respect to the offering; (c) the investors were provided with certain disclosure materials and all other information requested with respect to our company; (d) the investors acknowledged that all securities being purchased were “restricted securities” for purposes of the Securiti es Act, and agreed to transfer such securities only in a transaction registered under the Securities Act or exempt from registration under the Securities Act; and (e) a legend was placed on the certificates representing each such security stating that it was restricted and could only be transferred if subsequent registered under the Securities Act or transferred in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act.

On January 27, 2009, we issued 2,500,000 common shares to directors, officers and consultants as compensation for services rendered at a fair value of $250,000.  The shares were valued at an estimated fair market value of $0.10 per share based on the prevailing quoted market price on the date of issue.

On April 21, 2009, we issued 1,600,000 common shares to directors, officers and consultants as compensation for services rendered at a fair value of $128,000. The shares were valued at an estimated fair market value of $0.08 per share based on the prevailing quoted market price on the date of issue.

On June 24, 2009, we issued 750,000 common shares and 375,000 share purchase warrants valued at $131,924 to a new director and to a special advisory member to the Board of Directors as incentive bonus for their current and future services. The share purchase warrants issued is exercisable at $0.20 for a period of two from the date of issuance.

These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption for sales of securities not involving a public offering as set forth in Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and in Section 4(2) and Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On August 17, 2009, we issued 2,500,000 shares of our Common Stock to directors, officers and consultants as 2009 Bonus Compensation Shares for their services to our company.  The foregoing securities were exempt from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 of Regulation D thereunder and Regulation S Securities Act of 1933.

We anticipate that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. However, we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock for additional phases of exploration. We believe that debt financing will not be an alternative for funding additional phases of exploration. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing.

There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve further sales of our common stock or any other form of additional financing. If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then we will not be able to continue our exploration and our venture will fail.

23

Subsequent events

On October 5, 2009,  our company issued 500,000  shares of common stock and 250,000 share purchase warrants to a director as an incentive bonus compensation. In addition, 250,000 shares of common stock previously issued to a director were cancelled. The foregoing securities are exempt from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and  Regulation S Securities Act of 1933

Foreign exchange matters

We hold a significant portion of our cash reserves in Canadian dollars. Due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the value of these Canadian dollar reserves can result in either translation gains or losses in US dollar terms. If there was to be a significant decline in the Canadian dollar versus the US Dollar our US dollar cash position would also significantly decline. We have not entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations. Such foreign exchange declines could cause us to experience losses.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements including arrangements that would affect the liquidity, capital resources, market risk support and credit risk support or other benefits.

ITEM 3.  Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities. Most of our activity is the development and mining of our mining claim.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management team, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of the last day of the fiscal period covered by this report, September 30, 2009.  The term disclosure controls and procedures means our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported,

24

within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009.

Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f).  Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer  are required to base their assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting on a suitable, recognized control framework, such as the framework developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO).  The COSO framework, published in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, is known as the COSO Report.  Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, have chosen the COSO framework on which to base their assessment.  Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our interna l control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2009.

Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in our annual reports on Form 10-K for the annual reporting periods through June 30, 2009.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the Quarter ended September 30, 2009, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

25

PART II   OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries' officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Item 1a.  Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risk factors together with the other information contained in this Interim Report on Form 10-Q, and in prior reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such cases, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

OUR COMMON STOCK IS SUBJECT TO PENNY STOCK REGULATION

Our shares are subject to the provisions of Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-9 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), commonly referred to as the "penny stock" rule. Section 15(g) sets forth certain requirements for transactions in penny stocks and Rule 15g-9(d)(1) incorporates the definition of penny stock as that used in Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. The Commission generally defines penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Rule 3a51-1 provides that any equity security is considered to be penny stock unless that security is: registered and traded on a national securities exchange meeting specified criteria set by the Commission; authorized for quotation on the NASDAQ Stock Market; issued by a registered investment company; excluded from the definition on the basis of pric e (at least $5.00 per share) or the registrant's net tangible assets; or exempted from the definition by the Commission. Since our shares are deemed to be "penny stock", trading in the shares will be subject to additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell penny stock to persons other than established customers and accredited investors.

FINRA SALES PRACTICE REQUIREMENTS MAY ALSO LIMIT A STOCKHOLDER'S ABILITY TO BUY AND SELL OUR STOCK.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts

26

to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

WE MAY NOT HAVE ACCESS TO SUFFICIENT CAPITAL TO PURSUE OUR BUSINESS AND THEREFORE WOULD BE UNABLE TO ACHIEVE OUR PLANNED FUTURE GROWTH:

We intend to pursue a growth strategy that includes development of the Company's business plan.  Currently we have limited capital which is insufficient to pursue our plans for development and growth.  Our ability to implement our exploration plans will depend primarily on our ability to obtain additional private or public equity or debt financing.  Such financing may not be available at all, or we may be unable to locate and secure additional capital on terms and conditions that are acceptable to us.  Our failure to obtain additional capital will have a material adverse effect on our business.

WE DO NOT INTEND TO PAY DIVIDENDS.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We may not have sufficient funds to legally pay dividends. Even if funds are legally available to pay dividends, we may nevertheless decide in our sole discretion not to pay dividends. The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of the board of directors, and will depend upon, among other things, the results of our operations, cash flows and financial condition, operating and capital requirements, and other factors our board of directors may consider relevant. There is no assurance that we will pay any dividends in the future, and, if dividends are rapid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend.

BECAUSE WE ARE QUOTED ON THE OTCBB INSTEAD OF AN EXCHANGE OR NATIONAL QUOTATION SYSTEM, OUR INVESTORS MAY HAVE MORE DIFFICULTY SELLING THEIR STOCK OR EXPERIENCE NEGATIVE VOLATILITY ON THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR STOCK.

Our common stock is traded on the OTCBB. The OTCBB is often highly illiquid, in part because it does not have a national quotation system by which potential investors can follow the market price of shares except through information received and generated by a limited number of broker-dealers that make markets in particular stocks. There is a greater chance of volatility for securities that trade on the OTCBB as compared to a national exchange or quotation system. This volatility may be caused by a variety of factors, including the lack of readily available price quotations, the absence of consistent administrative supervision of bid and ask quotations, lower trading volume, and market conditions. Investors in our common stock may experience high fluctuations in the market price and volume of the trading market for our securities. These fluctuations, when they occur, have a negative effect on the market price for our securities. Accordingly, our stockholders may not be able to realize a fair price from their shares when they determine to sell them or may have to hold them for a substantial period of time until the market for our common stock improves.

27

AS A PUBLIC COMPANY WE ARE SUBJECT TO COMPLEX LEGAL AND ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS THAT WILL REQUIRE US TO INCUR SIGNIFICANT EXPENSES AND WILL EXPOSE US TO RISK OF NON-COMPLIANCE.

As a public company, we are subject to numerous legal and accounting requirements that do not apply to private companies.  The cost of compliance with many of these requirements is material, not only in absolute terms but, more importantly, in relation to the overall scope of the operations of a small company.  Our relative inexperience with these requirements may increase the cost of compliance and may also increase the risk that we will fail to comply.  Failure to comply with these requirements can have numerous adverse consequences including, but not limited to, our inability to file required periodic reports on a timely basis, loss of market confidence, delisting of our securities and/or governmental or private actions against us.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with all of these requirements or that the cost of such compliance will not p rove to be a substantial competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis our privately held and larger public competitors.

FAILURE TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS.

It may be time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop and implement the additional internal controls, processes and reporting procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal auditing and other finance staff in order to develop and implement appropriate additional internal controls, processes and reporting procedures. If we are unable to comply with these requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may not be able to obtain the independent accountant certifications that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires of publicly traded companies.

If we fail to comply in a timely manner with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding internal control over financial reporting or to remedy any material weaknesses in our internal controls that we may identify, such failure could result in material misstatements in our financial statements, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and current SEC regulations, we are required to prepare assessments regarding internal controls over financial reporting and beginning with this annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal period ending June 30, 2009. We have begun the process of documenting and testing our internal control procedures in order to satisfy these requirements, which is likely to result in increased general and administrative expenses and may shift management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

In addition, in connection with our on-going assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may discover “material weaknesses” in our internal

28

controls as defined in standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The PCAOB defines “significant deficiency” as a deficiency that results in more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.

In the event that a material weakness is identified, we will employ qualified personnel and adopt and implement policies and procedures to address any material weaknesses that we identify. However, the process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company. We cannot assure you that the measures we will take will remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial process and reporting in the future.

Any failure to complete our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify or to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management evaluations of our internal controls and, in the case of a failure to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify, would adversely affect the annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Inadequate internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in ou r reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

THE REPORT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM CONTAINS EXPLANATORY LANGUAGE THAT SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT EXISTS ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN.

The independent auditor’s report on our financial statements contains explanatory language that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern. We depend on the continued contributions of our executive officers to work effectively as a team, to execute our business strategy and to manage our business. The loss of key personnel, or their failure to work effectively, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. If we are unable to obtain sufficient financing in the near term or achieve profitability, then we would, in all likelihood, experience severe liquidity problems and may have to curtail our operations. If we curtail our operations, we may be placed into bankruptcy or undergo liquidation, the result of which will adversely affect the value of our common shares.

THE PRICE AT WHICH YOU PURCHASE OUR COMMON SHARES MAY NOT BE INDICATIVE OF THE PRICE THAT WILL PREVAIL IN THE TRADING MARKET. YOU MAY BE UNABLE TO SELL YOUR COMMON SHARES AT OR ABOVE YOUR PURCHASE PRICE, WHICH MAY RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES TO YOU.

29

THE MARKET PRICE FOR OUR COMMON SHARES IS PARTICULARLY VOLATILE GIVEN OUR STATUS AS A RELATIVELY UNKNOWN COMPANY WITH A SMALL AND THINLY TRADED PUBLIC FLOAT, LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND LACK OF PROFITS WHICH COULD LEAD TO WIDE FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR SHARE PRICE.

The market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our common shares are sporadically and thinly traded. As a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our shareholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our common shares are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to a seasoned issuer which could better absorb those sales without adverse impact on its share price. Secondly, we are a speculative or “risky” investment due to our limited operating history and lack of profits to date, and uncertainty of future market acceptance for our potential products. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a seasoned issuer. Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. We cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common shares will be at any time, including as to whether our common shares will sustain their current market prices, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of common shares for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.

Shareholders should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor lo sses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the volatility of our share price.

30

VOLATILITY IN OUR COMMON SHARE PRICE MAY SUBJECT US TO SECURITIES LITIGATION, THEREBY DIVERTING OUR RESOURCES THAT MAY HAVE A MATERIAL EFFECT ON OUR PROFITABILITY AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

As discussed in the preceding risk factors, the market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities and could divert management’s attention and resources.

MINNESOTA LAW AND OUR ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION PROTECT OUR DIRECTORS FROM CERTAIN TYPES OF LAWSUITS, WHICH COULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR US TO RECOVER DAMAGES FROM THEM IN THE EVENT OF A LAWSUIT.

Minnesota law provides that our directors will not be liable to our company or to our stockholders for monetary damages for all but certain types of conduct as directors. Our Articles of Incorporation require us to indemnify our directors and officers against all damages incurred in connection with our business to the fullest extent provided or allowed by law. The exculpation provisions may have the effect of preventing stockholders from recovering damages against our directors caused by their negligence, poor judgment or other circumstances. The indemnification provisions may require our company to use our assets to defend our directors and officers against claims, including claims arising out of their negligence, poor judgment, or other circumstances.

WE HAVE NOT IDENTIFIED ANY MINERAL RESERVES OR RESOURCES AND DUE TO THE SPECULATIVE NATURE OF MINERAL PROPERTY EXPLORATION, THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL RISK THAT NO COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITABLE MINERALS WILL BE FOUND AND OUR BUSINESS WILL FAIL.

Exploration for minerals is a speculative venture involving substantial risk. We cannot provide investors with any assurance that our claims and properties contain commercially exploitable reserves. The exploration work that we intend to conduct on our claims or properties may not result in the discovery of commercial quantities of uranium, gold or other minerals. Problems such as unusual and unexpected rock formations and other conditions are involved in mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. In such a case, we would be unable to complete our business plan.

WE ARE A MINERAL EXPLORATION COMPANY WITH A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND EXPECT TO INCUR OPERATING LOSSES FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

We are a mineral exploration company.  We have never earned any revenues and we have never been profitable.  Prior to completing exploration on our claims, we may incur increased operating expenses without realizing any revenues from those claims.  There are numerous difficulties normally encountered by mineral exploration companies, and these

31

companies experience a high rate of failure.  The likelihood of success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays encountered in connection with the exploration of the mineral properties that we plan to undertake.  These potential problems include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to exploration and additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates.  We have no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that our business will prove successful, and we can provide no assurance to investors that we will generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable operations.  

BECAUSE OF THE SPECULATIVE NATURE OF MINERAL PROPERTY EXPLORATION, THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL RISK THAT NO COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITABLE MINERALS WILL BE FOUND AND OUR BUSINESS WILL FAIL.

Exploration for minerals is a speculative venture involving substantial risk.  We cannot provide investors with any assurance that our claims and properties contain commercially exploitable reserves.  The exploration work that we intend to conduct on our claims or properties may not result in the discovery of commercial quantities of uranium, gold or other minerals.  Problems such as unusual and unexpected rock formations and other conditions are involved in mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts.  In such a case, we would be unable to complete our business plan.

BECAUSE OF THE INHERENT DANGERS INVOLVED IN MINERAL EXPLORATION, THERE IS A RISK THAT WE MAY INCUR LIABILITY OR DAMAGES AS WE CONDUCT OUR BUSINESS.

The search for valuable minerals involves numerous hazards.  As a result, we may become subject to liability for such hazards, including pollution, cave-ins and other hazards against which we cannot, or may elect not, to insure.  We currently have no such insurance, but our management intends to periodically review the availability of commercially reasonable insurance coverage.  If a hazard were to occur, the costs of rectifying the hazard may exceed our asset value and cause us to liquidate all our assets.

IF WE CONFIRM COMMERCIAL CONCENTRATIONS OF URANIUM, GOLD OR OTHER MINERALS ON OUR CLAIMS AND INTERESTS, WE CAN PROVIDE NO ASSURANCE THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY BRING THOSE CLAIMS OR INTERESTS INTO COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION.

If our exploration programs are successful in confirming deposits of commercial tonnage and grade, we will require additional funds in order to place the claims and interests into commercial production.  This may occur for a number of reasons, including because of regulatory or permitting difficulties, because we are unable to obtain any adequate funds or because we cannot obtain such funds on terms that we consider economically feasible.  

BECAUSE ACCESS TO MOST OF OUR PROPERTIES IS OFTEN RESTRICTED BY INCLEMENT WEATHER, OUR EXPLORATION PROGRAMS ARE LIKELY TO EXPERIENCE DELAYS.

Access to most of the properties underlying our claims and interests is restricted due to their remote locations and because of weather conditions.  Most of these properties are only accessible by air.  As a result, any attempts to visit, test, or explore the property are generally limited to those periods when weather permits such activities.  These limitations can result in significant delays in exploration efforts, as well as mining and production

32

efforts in the event that commercial amounts of minerals are found.  This could cause our business to fail.

AS WE UNDERTAKE EXPLORATION OF OUR CLAIMS AND INTERESTS, WE WILL BE SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE OF GOVERNMENT REGULATION THAT MAY INCREASE THE ANTICIPATED TIME AND COST OF OUR EXPLORATION PROGRAM.

There are several governmental regulations that materially restrict the exploration of minerals.  We will be subject to the mining laws and regulations in force in the jurisdictions where our claims are located, and these laws and regulations may change over time.  In order to comply with these regulations, we may be required to obtain work permits, post bonds and perform remediation work for any physical disturbance to land.  While our planned budget for exploration programs includes a contingency for regulatory compliance, there is a risk that new regulations could increase our costs of doing business and prevent us from carrying out our exploration program, or that the budgeted amounts are inadequate.

DUE TO EXTERNAL MARKET FACTORS IN THE MINING BUSINESS, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO MARKET ANY MINERALS THAT MAY BE FOUND.

The mining industry, in general, is intensely competitive.  Even if commercial quantities of minerals are discovered, we can provide no assurance to investors that a ready market will exist for the sale of these minerals.  Numerous factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of any substances discovered.  These factors include market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of markets and processing equipment, and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, mineral importing and exporting and environmental protection.  The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but any combination of these factors may result in our not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

OUR PERFORMANCE MAY BE SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATIONS IN MARKET PRICES OF URANIUM, GOLD AND OTHER MINERALS.

The profitability of a mineral exploration project could be significantly affected by changes in the market price of the relevant minerals.  Recently, the market price of uranium has increased due in large measure to projections as to the number of new nuclear energy plants that will be constructed in China, the United States and other jurisdictions.  With respect to the market prices of gold, mine production and the willingness of third parties such as central banks to sell or lease gold affects the supply of gold.  Demand for gold can also be influenced by economic conditions, attractiveness as an investment vehicle and the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and local investment currencies.  A number of other factors affect the market prices for other minerals.  The aggregate effect of the factors affecting the prices of various minerals is impossible to predict with accuracy.  Fluctuations in mineral prices may adversely affect the value of any mineral discoveries made on the properties with which we are involved, which may in turn affect the market price and liquidity of our common stock and our ability to pursue and implement our business plan.

BECAUSE WE HOLD A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF OUR CASH RESERVES IN CANADIAN DOLLARS, WE MAY EXPERIENCE LOSSES DUE TO FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRANSLATIONS.

33

We hold a significant portion of our cash reserves in Canadian dollars.  Due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the value of these Canadian dollar reserves can result in both translation gains or losses in U.S. dollar terms.  If there was to be a significant decline in the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar, our U.S. dollar cash position would also significantly decline.  We have not entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations.  Such foreign exchange declines could cause us to experience losses.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There were no Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities during the three months ended September 30, 2009.

Item 3.  Defaults upon Senior Securities

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the period ended September 30, 2009.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Company during the first quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.

Item 5.  Other Information

There is no information with respect to which information is not otherwise called for by this form.

34

Item 6.  Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation(1)
3.2	By-Laws(1)
4.1	2006 Stock Option Plan(2)
10.1	Property Agreement(1)
10.2	Trust Agreement 1(1)
10.3	Trust Agreement 2(1)
10.4	Trust Agreement 3(1)
10.5	Trust Agreement 4(1)
10.6	Letter of Intent effective March 10, 2006 with Apofas Ltd.(3)
10.7	Letter agreement effective May 12, 2006 with Virginia Mines Inc. (4)
14.1	Code of Ethics(5)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
99.1	Summary Report on the Peter's Creek Placer Gold Property(6)
99.2	Progress Report on the Peter's Creek Gold Property(6)
99.3	Peter's Creek Gold Property Outline(7)

⁽¹⁾

Incorporated by referenced from the corresponding Exhibit to the small business issuer's registration statement on Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on September 14, 2005.

⁽²⁾

Incorporated by referenced from the corresponding Exhibit to the small business issuer's registration statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on March 9, 2006.

⁽³⁾

Incorporated by referenced from the Exhibit to the small business issuer's current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2006.

⁽⁴⁾

Incorporated by referenced from the Exhibit to the small business issuer's current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 9, 2006.

35

⁽⁵⁾

Incorporated by referenced from the Exhibits to the small business issuer's annual report on Form 10-KSB filed with the SEC on October 12, 2006.

⁽⁶⁾

Incorporated by referenced from the Exhibits to the small business issuer's registration statement on Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on November 5, 2005.

⁽⁷⁾

Incorporated by referenced from the Exhibits to the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Uranium Star Corp. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

URANIUM STAR CORP.

Date: November 10, 2009

By: /s/ J. A. Kirk McKinnon

J. A. Kirk McKinnon
Chief Executive Officer

By:/s/ Richard E. Schler

Richard E. Schler

Chief Financial Officer

36

Exhibit 31.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection  with the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Uranium Star Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. A. Kirk McKinnon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Uranium Star Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

37

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's second fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  November 10, 2009

By: /s/ J. A. Kirk McKinnon

J. A. Kirk McKinnon
          

Chief Executive Officer

38

Exhibit 31.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and pursuant to Rule 13a-14b) and Rule 15d-14(b)(17 CFR  240.15d-14(b))  under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section  1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Uranium Star Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard E. Schler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Uranium Star Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

39

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's second fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  November 10, 2009

By: /s/ Richard E. Schler

Richard E. Schler

Chief Financial Officer

40

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uranium Star Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. A. Kirk McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By   /s/ J. A. Kirk McKinnon

J. A. Kirk McKinnon

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 10, 2009

41

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uranium Star Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Richard E. Schler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

        By  /s/ Richard E. Schler

Richard E. Schler

Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 10, 2009

42