Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, 8.25% Series A Cumulative Redeemable, par value $0.01 per share		New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, 7.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable, par value $0.01 per share		New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, 8.50% Series C Cumulative Redeemable, par value $0.01 per share		New York Stock Exchange
7.375% Senior Unsecured Notes due in 2021		New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý

The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock, all of which is voting, held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2017 (computed based on the closing price on such date as reported on the NYSE) was $437.4 million. As of February 16, 2018, the registrant had 61,723,387 shares of common stock outstanding.

Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the registrant's 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "2018 Proxy Statement"), to be filed within 120 days after the end of the registrant's fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This report contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the operating performance of our investments and financing needs. We use words such as "anticipate," "expect," "believe," "intend," "should," "will," "may" and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions, discuss future expectations, describe future plans and strategies, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition or state other forward-looking information. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate market specifically; adverse changes in our status with government-sponsored enterprises affecting our ability to originate loans through such programs; changes in interest rates; the quality and size of the investment pipeline and the rate at which we can invest our cash; impairments in the value of the collateral underlying our loans and investments; changes in federal and state laws and regulations, including changes in tax laws; the availability and cost of capital for future investments; and competition. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which reflect management's views as of the date of this report. The factors noted above could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those contained in any forward-looking statement. For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries—Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies" under Item 7 of this report.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results.

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K we refer to Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as "Arbor," "we," "us," "our," or the "Company" unless we specifically state otherwise or the context indicates otherwise.

Arbor is a Maryland corporation formed in 2003. We operate through two business segments: our Structured Business and our Agency Business. Through our Structured Loan Origination and Investment Business, or "Structured Business," we invest in a diversified portfolio of structured finance assets in the multifamily and commercial real estate markets, primarily consisting of bridge and mezzanine loans, including junior participating interests in first mortgages, preferred and direct equity. We may also directly acquire real property and invest in real estate-related notes and certain mortgage-related securities. Through our Agency Loan Origination and Servicing Business, or "Agency Business," which was formed as a result of the acquisition of the agency platform of Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC ("ACM" or our "Former Manager") in the third quarter of 2016 (the "Acquisition"), we originate, sell and service a range of multifamily finance products through the Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae") and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac," and together with Fannie Mae, the government-sponsored enterprises, or the "GSEs"), the Government National Mortgage Association ("Ginnie Mae"), Federal Housing Authority ("FHA") and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (together with Ginnie Mae and FHA, "HUD") and conduit/commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS") programs. We retain the servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on substantially all loans we originate and sell under the GSE and HUD programs. We are an approved Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing ("DUS") lender nationally, a Freddie Mac Multifamily Conventional Loan lender, seller/servicer, in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, a Freddie Mac affordable, manufactured housing, senior housing and small balance loan ("SBL") lender, seller/servicer, nationally and a HUD MAP and LEAN senior housing/healthcare lender nationally.

We were previously externally managed and advised by ACM. Effective May 31, 2017, we exercised our option to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement. See Acquisition of Our Former Manager's Agency Platform for details.

Substantially all of our operations are conducted through our operating partnership, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership ("ARLP"), for which we serve as the general partner, and ARLP's subsidiaries. We are organized to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A REIT is generally not subject to federal income tax on that portion of its REIT taxable income that is distributed to its stockholders, provided that at least 90% of taxable income is distributed and provided that certain other requirements are met. Certain of our assets that produce non-qualifying REIT income, primarily within the Agency Business, are operated through taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS"), which is part of our TRS consolidated group (the "TRS Consolidated Group") and is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. In general, our TRS entities may hold assets that the REIT cannot hold directly and may engage in real estate or non-real estate-related business.

On July 14, 2016, we completed the Acquisition of the agency platform of our Former Manager for an aggregate purchase price of $275.8 million, which was paid with a combination of operating partnership units ("OP Units"), cash and a seller financing instrument. The closing price of our

common stock on the Acquisition date was $7.29 per share; therefore, the estimated fair value of the total consideration was $292.5 million.

See Note 3—Acquisition of Our Former Manager's Agency Platform for additional details of the Acquisition and internalization of our management team.

Our principle business objectives are to maximize the difference between the yield on our investments and the cost of financing these investments, to grow the stable earnings associated with the servicing portfolio of our agency platform, to generate cash available for distribution and facilitate capital appreciation. We believe we can achieve these objectives and maximize the total return to our stockholders through the investment strategies described below:

The financing of multifamily and commercial real estate offers opportunities that demand customized financing solutions. We believe that providing both structured products and agency loans through direct originations and in-house underwriting capabilities throughout our national network of sales offices and lending solutions through various GSE and HUD programs provides us with a competitive advantage, since this allows us to meet the multiple needs of our borrowers through a fully integrated comprehensive product offering. We employ the following investment strategies:

Provide Customized Financing. We provide customized financing to meet the needs of our borrowers. We target borrowers whose options may be limited by conventional bank financing, have demonstrated a history of enhancing the value of the properties they operate and who may benefit from the customized financing solutions we offer.

Execute Transactions Rapidly. We act quickly and decisively on proposals, provide commitments and close transactions within a few weeks and sometimes days, if required. We believe that rapid execution attracts opportunities from both borrowers and other lenders that would not otherwise be available. We believe our ability to structure flexible terms and close loans in a timely manner gives us a competitive advantage.

Manage Credit Quality. A critical component of our strategy is our ability to manage the real estate risk associated with our investment portfolio. We actively manage the credit quality of our portfolio by using the expertise of our asset management group, which has a proven track record of structuring and repositioning investments to improve credit quality and yield.

Use Our Relationships with Existing Borrowers. We capitalize on our reputation in the commercial real estate finance industry. We have relationships with a large borrower base nationwide. Since our originators offer a wide range of customized financing solutions, we are able to benefit from the existing customer base and use existing business as means of potential refinancing opportunities.

Long-Established Relationships with GSEs. Our Agency Business benefits from our long-established relationships with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and HUD enabling us to offer a broad range of loan products and services which maximizes our ability to meet our borrowers' needs.

Leverage the Experience of Executive Officers and Our Employees. Our executive officers and employees have extensive experience originating and managing structured commercial real estate

investments. Our senior management team has, on average, over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry.

We pursue short-term and long-term lending and investment opportunities and primarily target transactions where we believe we have competitive advantages, particularly our lower cost structure and in-house underwriting capabilities.

Through our Structured Business, we focus primarily on the following investment types:

Bridge Financing. We offer bridge financing products to borrowers who are typically seeking short-term capital to use in an acquisition of property. The borrower has usually identified an undervalued asset that has been under managed and/or is located in a recovering market. From the borrower's perspective, shorter term bridge financing is advantageous because it allows for time to improve the property value without encumbering it with restrictive, long-term debt that may not reflect optimal leverage for a non-stabilized property.

Our bridge loans typically range in size from $5 million to $40 million, have an interest rate range typically between 5% to 6% over 30-day LIBOR, have terms of up to five years and are predominantly secured by first mortgage liens on the property. Additional yield enhancements may include origination fees, deferred interest, yield look-backs, and participating interests, which are equity interests in the borrower that share in a percentage of the underlying cash flows of the property. Borrowers typically use the proceeds of a conventional mortgage to repay a bridge loan.

Mezzanine Financing. We offer mezzanine financing in the form of loans that are subordinate to a conventional first mortgage loan and senior to the borrower's equity in a transaction. Mezzanine financing may take the form of loans secured by pledges of ownership interests in entities that directly or indirectly control the real property or subordinated loans secured by second mortgage liens on the property. We may also require additional security such as personal guarantees, letters of credit and/or additional collateral unrelated to the property.

Our mezzanine loans typically range in size from $1 million to $10 million, have an interest rate range typically between 12% to 14% and have terms of up to ten years. Similar to our bridge loans, the yield on these investments may be enhanced by prepaid and deferred interest payments, yield look-backs and participating interests. We hold a majority of our mezzanine loans through subsidiaries of our operating partnership that are pass-through entities for tax purposes.

Preferred Equity Investments. We provide financing by making preferred equity investments in entities that directly or indirectly own real property. In cases where the terms of a first mortgage prohibit additional liens on the ownership entity, investments structured as preferred equity in the entity owning the property serve as viable financing substitutes. With preferred equity investments, we typically become a member in the ownership entity.

Our preferred equity investments typically range in size from $1 million to $25 million, have an interest rate range typically between 10% to 14% and have terms of up to ten years. Similar to our bridge loans, the yield on these investments may be enhanced by prepaid and deferred interest payments, yield look-backs and participating interests.

Junior Participation Financing. We offer junior participation financing in the form of a junior participating interest in the senior debt. Junior participation financings have the same obligations, collateral and borrower as the senior debt. The junior participation interest is subordinated to the senior debt by virtue of a contractual agreement between the senior debt lender and the junior participating interest lender.

Our junior participation loans typically range in size from $1 million to $10 million, have an interest rate range typically between 12% to 14% and have terms of up to ten years. Similar to our bridge loans, the yield on these investments may be enhanced by prepaid and deferred interest payments, yield look-backs and participating interests.

Structured Transactions. We also periodically invest in structured transactions, which are primarily comprised of joint ventures formed to acquire, develop and/or sell real estate related assets. These joint ventures are generally not majority owned or controlled by us and are primarily accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Through our Agency Business, we focus primarily on the following investment types:

GSE and HUD Agency Lending. We are one of 25 approved lenders that participate in Fannie Mae's DUS program and one of 22 lenders approved as a Freddie Mac Multifamily Conventional Loan lender for multifamily, manufactured, student, affordable and certain seniors housing properties, one of 11 participants in the Freddie Mac SBL program and an approved HUD MAP and LEAN lender providing construction permanent loans to developers and owners of multifamily housing, affordable housing, seniors housing and healthcare facilities. Our Agency Business underwrites, originates, sells and services multifamily mortgage loans across the U.S. through these programs and also originates and sells loans through the conduit markets. Our focus is primarily on small balance loans with an average loan size of approximately $5 million. We retain the servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on substantially all loans made under the GSE and HUD programs.

Real Property. We have, and may in the future, obtain real estate by foreclosure, through partial or full settlement of mortgage debt related to our loans, or as an investment opportunity. We may identify such assets and initiate an asset-specific plan to maximize the value of the investment, which may include appointing a third party property manager, renovating the property, leasing or increasing occupancy, or selling the asset. As such, these transactions may require the use of additional capital prior to completion of the specific plan. In situations where we purchase real property as an investment opportunity, we typically analyze these transactions with the expectation that we will have the ability to sell the property within a one to three year time period for a significant return on invested capital.

Freddie Mac SBL Program Securities. We have, and may in the future, invest in bond securities issued by Freddie Mac SBL securitizations from loans we originated and sold under the Freddie Mac SBL program. These securities are carried at cost and are usually purchased at a discount to their face value which is accreted into interest income, if deemed to be collectable, over the expected remaining life of the related security as a yield adjustment.

Product type and asset class information about our loan and investment portfolio as of December 31, 2017 is as follows ($ in thousands):

Asset class and geographic information for our loan and investment portfolio as of December 31, 2017 is as follows ($ in thousands):

The overall yield on our loan and investment portfolio in 2017 was 6.27% on average assets of $2.18 billion. This yield was computed by dividing the interest income earned during 2017 by the average assets during 2017. Our cost of funds in 2017 was 4.67% on average borrowings of

$1.59 billion. This cost of funds was computed by dividing the interest expense incurred during 2017 by the average borrowings during 2017.

We also own unconsolidated investments in equity affiliates totaling $23.7 million, which consists primarily of a joint venture with our Former Manager formed to invest in a residential mortgage banking business.

One of the Agency Business's primary sources of revenue are the gains and fees recognized from the origination and sale of mortgage loans under GSE and HUD programs. Loans originated under GSE and HUD programs are generally sold within 60 days from the loan origination date. Our loan activity in 2017 was comprised of originations totaling $4.46 billion and sales totaling $4.81 billion. Our gains and fees as a percentage of our loan sales volume ("sales margin,") was 151 basis points for 2017.

We also retain the mortgage servicing rights ("MSRs") on substantially all of the loans we originate, and record as revenue the fair value of the expected net future cash flows associated with the servicing of these loans. Servicing revenue is generated from the fees we receive for servicing the loans and on escrow deposits held on behalf of borrowers, net of amortization on the MSR assets.

Product and geographic concentration information about our Agency Business servicing portfolio as of December 31, 2017 is as follows ($ in thousands):

Prior to May 31, 2017, pursuant to a management agreement, ACM employed certain of our executive officers and other staff who provided us with advisory and professional services vital to our operations, including Structured Business underwriting, accounting and treasury, compliance, marketing, information technology and human resources. Pursuant to the terms of the management agreement, we reimbursed ACM for its actual costs incurred in connection with managing our business through a base management fee. In May 2017, we exercised our option to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement. See Note 3—Acquisition of Our Former Manager's Agency Platform for details.

In addition, we have entered into a shared services agreement with our Former Manager and certain of its affiliates where we will provide limited support services to our Former Manager and our Former Manager will reimburse us for the costs of performing such services.

The following describes our lending and investment process for both our Structured and Agency Businesses.

Origination. We have a network of sales offices in California, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas that staff approximately 20 loan originators who solicit property owners, developers and mortgage loan brokers. In some instances, the originators accept loan applications which meet our underwriting criteria from a select group of mortgage loan brokers. Once potential borrowers have been identified, we determine which of our financing products best meet the borrower's needs. Loan originators in every sales office are able to offer borrowers the full array of finance products for both the Structured and Agency businesses. After identifying a suitable product, we work with the borrower to prepare a loan application. Upon completion by the borrower, the application is forwarded to our underwriters for due diligence.

Underwriting and Risk Management. Our underwriters perform due diligence on all proposed transactions prior to approval and commitment using several tools to manage and mitigate potential loan losses and risk sharing exposure. The underwriters analyze each loan application in accordance with the guidelines below to determine the loan's conformity with the guidelines. Key factors considered in credit decisions include, but are not limited to, debt service coverage, loan to value ratios and property financial and operating performance. In general, our underwriting guidelines require it to evaluate the following:

With respect to our Fannie Mae loans, we maintain concentration limits to further mitigate risk. Geographic concentrations of such loans are limited, based on regional employment concentration and trends, and we limit the aggregate amount of such loans subject to full risk-sharing for any one borrower and elect to use modified risk-sharing for such loans of more than $23.0 million, in accordance with Fannie Mae requirements. We also rely heavily on loan surveillance and credit risk

management. We have a dedicated group of employees whose sole function is to monitor and analyze loan performance from closing to payoff, with the primary goal of managing and mitigating risk within the Fannie Mae portfolio.

We continuously refine our underwriting criteria based upon actual loan portfolio experience and as market conditions and investor requirements evolve.

Investment Approval Process. We apply an established investment approval process to all loans and other investments proposed for our Structured Business portfolio before submitting each proposal for final approval. A written report is generated for every loan or other investment that is submitted to our credit committee for approval, which consists of our chief executive officer, chief credit officer and executive vice president of structured finance. The report includes a description of the prospective borrower and any guarantors, the collateral and the proposed use of investment proceeds, as well as borrower and property financial statements and analysis. The report also includes an analysis of borrower liquidity, net worth, cash investment, income, credit history and operating experience. All transactions require the approval of a majority of the members of our credit committee. Following the approval of a transaction, our underwriting and servicing departments, together with our asset management group, assure that all loan approval terms have been satisfied and conform with lending requirements established for that particular transaction.

Our loan approval process for the Agency Business requires the submission of a detailed loan package in accordance with our underwriting checklist to our agency loan committee for approval. Our agency loan committee consists of multiple members of our senior and executive management teams, including our chief underwriter for the Agency Business and its chief operating officer. All transactions require the approval of up to four members, depending on the size of the loan. In addition, we are required to submit a completed loan underwriting package to Freddie Mac and HUD for approval prior to origination.

Servicing. We service all loans and investments through our internal loan servicing department in Depew, New York, which consists of an expanding portfolio of 3,322 loans with outstanding balances of $16.21 billion at December 31, 2017. Our loan servicing operations are designed to provide prompt customer service and accurate and timely information for account follow up, financial reporting and management review. Following the funding of an approved loan, all pertinent loan data is entered into our data processing system, which provides monthly billing statements, tracks payment performance and processes contractual interest rate adjustments on variable rate loans. The servicing group works closely with our asset management group to ensure the appropriate level of customer service and monitoring of loans.

For most loans serviced under the Fannie Mae DUS program, we are required to advance, in the event of a borrower failing to pay, the principal and interest payments and tax and insurance escrow amounts associated with a loan for four months. We are reimbursed by Fannie Mae for these advances, which may be used to offset any losses incurred under our risk-sharing obligations once the loan and the related loss share is settled.

Under the HUD program, we are obligated to advance tax and insurance escrow amounts and principal and interest payments on the Ginnie Mae securities until the Ginnie Mae security is fully paid. In the event of a default on a HUD-insured loan, we can elect to assign the loan to HUD and file a mortgage insurance claim. HUD will reimburse approximately 99% of any losses of principal and interest on the loan and Ginnie Mae will reimburse substantially all of the remaining losses.

Asset Management. Effective asset and portfolio management is essential to maximize the performance and value of a real estate investment. The asset management group customizes a plan with the loan originators and underwriters to track each investment from origination through disposition. This group monitors each investment's operating history, local economic trends and rental

and occupancy rates and evaluates the underlying property's competitiveness within its market. This group assesses ongoing and potential operational and financial performance of each investment in order to evaluate and ultimately improve its operations and financial viability. The asset management group performs frequent onsite inspections, conducts meetings with borrowers and evaluates and participates in the budgeting process, financial and operational review and renovation plans of each underlying property. This group also focuses on increasing the productivity of onsite property managers and leasing brokers. This group communicates the status of each transaction against its established asset management plan to senior management, in order to enhance and preserve capital, as well as to avoid litigation and potential exposure.

Timely and accurate identification of an investment's operational and financial issues and each borrower's objectives is essential to implementing an executable loan workout and restructuring process, if required. Since the existing property management may not have the requisite expertise to manage the workout process effectively, our asset management group determines the current operating and financial status of an asset or portfolio and performs a liquidity analysis of the property and ownership entity and then, if appropriate, identifies and evaluates alternatives to maximize the value of an investment.

Investment Guidelines. Our Board of Directors has adopted general guidelines for our investments and borrowings to the effect that: (1) no investment will be made that would cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT; (2) no investment will be made that would cause us to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act; (3) no more than 25% of our equity (including junior subordinated notes as equity), determined as of the date of such investment, will be invested in any single asset; (4) no single mezzanine loan or preferred equity investment will exceed $75 million; (5) our Structured Business leverage (including junior subordinated notes as equity) will generally not exceed 80% of the UPB of our assets, in the aggregate; (6) we will not co-invest with our Former Manager or any of its affiliates unless such co-investment is otherwise in accordance with these guidelines and its terms are at least as favorable to us as to our Former Manager or the affiliate making such co-investment; and (7) no more than 15% of our gross assets may consist of mortgage-related securities. Any exceptions to the above general guidelines require the approval of our Board of Directors.

Financing Policies. We finance our structured finance investments primarily by borrowing against, or "leveraging," our existing portfolio and using the proceeds to acquire additional mortgage assets. We expect to incur debt such that we will maintain an equity-to-assets ratio no less than 20% (including junior subordinated notes as equity), although the actual ratio may be lower from time to time depending on market conditions and other factors deemed relevant. Our charter and bylaws do not limit the amount of indebtedness we can incur, and the Board of Directors has discretion to deviate from or change our indebtedness policy at any time, provided that we are in compliance with our bank covenants. However, we intend to maintain an adequate capital base to protect against various business environments in which our financing and hedging costs might exceed the interest income from our investments.

Our structured finance investments are financed primarily by collateralized loan obligations ("CLOs"), credit facilities and repurchase agreements with institutional lenders, junior subordinated notes, senior unsecured notes, a Luxembourg debt fund ("Debt Fund") and convertible debt instruments. Although we expect that these will be the principal means of leveraging these investments, we may issue common stock, preferred stock or secured, unsecured or convertible notes of any maturity if it appears advantageous to do so.

Our Agency Business finances loan originations with several committed and uncommitted warehouse credit facilities on a short-term basis, as these loans are generally transferred or sold within 60 days from the loan origination date. We also meet our restricted liquidity requirments and purchase and loss obligations with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through letters of credit issued by a financial institution.

Credit Risk Management Policy. We are exposed to various levels of credit risk depending on the nature of our underlying assets and the nature and level of credit enhancements supporting our assets. We, including our chief credit officer and our asset management group, review and monitor credit risk and other risks of loss associated with each investment. In addition, we seek to diversify our portfolio of assets to avoid undue geographic, issuer, industry and certain other types of concentrations. Our Board of Directors monitors the overall portfolio risk and reviews levels of provision for loss.

Interest Rate Risk Management Policy. To the extent that it is consistent with our election to qualify as a REIT, we generally follow an interest rate risk management policy intended to mitigate the negative effects of major interest rate changes. We minimize our interest rate risk from borrowings by attempting to structure the key terms of our borrowings to generally correspond to the interest rate terms of our assets.

We may enter into hedging transactions to protect our investment portfolio from interest rate fluctuations and other changes in market conditions. These transactions may include interest rate swaps, the purchase or sale of interest rate collars, caps or floors, options, mortgage derivatives and other hedging instruments. These instruments may be used to hedge as much of the interest rate risk we determine is in the best interest of our stockholders, given the cost of such hedges and the need to maintain our status as a REIT. In general, income from hedging transactions does not constitute qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income requirements. To the extent, however, that a hedging contract reduces interest rate risk on indebtedness incurred to acquire or carry real estate assets, any income that is derived from the hedging contract, would not give rise to non-qualifying income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. We may elect to bear a level of interest rate risk that could otherwise be hedged when we believe, based on all relevant facts, that bearing such risk is worthwhile.

Disposition Policies. We evaluate the asset portfolio in our Structured Business on a regular basis to determine if it continues to satisfy our investment criteria. Subject to certain restrictions applicable to REITs, we may sell our investments opportunistically and use the proceeds for debt reduction, additional originations, or working capital purposes.

Equity Capital Policies. Subject to applicable law, our Board of Directors has the authority, without further stockholder approval, to issue additional authorized common stock and preferred stock or otherwise raise capital, including through the issuance of senior securities and convertible debt instruments, in any manner and on the terms and for the consideration it deems appropriate, including in exchange for property. We may in the future issue common stock in connection with acquisitions. We also may issue units of partnership interest in our operating partnership in connection with acquisitions. We may, under certain circumstances, repurchase our common stock in private transactions with our stockholders, if those purchases are approved by our Board of Directors.

Conflicts of Interest Policies. We, our executive officers, and our Former Manager face conflicts of interests because of our relationships with each other. Our Former Manager has approximately 25% of the voting interest in our stock as of December 31, 2017. Our chairman and chief executive officer, is the chief executive officer of our Former Manager and beneficially owns approximately 70% of the outstanding membership interests of our Former Manager. One of our directors, is the chief operating officer of Arbor Management, LLC (the managing member of our Former Manager) and a trustee of two trusts that own noncontrolling membership interests in our Former Manager. Our general counsel,

is also the general counsel to our Former Manager. Our chief financial officer and treasurer, is the chief financial officer of our Former Manager. Our chief exective officer, one of our directors, general counsel, and chief financial officer, as well as our executive vice president of structured finance, executive vice president of structured securitization and chief credit officer, are members of our Former Manager's executive committee and, excluding our chief exective officer, own minority membership interests in our Former Manager.

We have implemented several policies, through board action and through the terms of our charter and our agreements with our Former Manager, to help address these conflicts of interest, including the following:

Our Board of Directors have approved the operating policies and the strategies set forth above. Our Board of Directors have the power to modify or waive these policies and strategies without the consent of our stockholders to the extent that the Board of Directors determines that such modification or waiver is in the best interest of our stockholders. Among other factors, developments in the market that either affects the policies and strategies mentioned herein, or that change our assessment of the market, may cause our Board of Directors to revise its policies and strategies. However, if such modification or waiver involves the relationship of, or a transaction between us, and our Former Manager, the approval of a majority of our independent directors is also required. We may not, however, amend our charter to change the requirement that a majority of our board consists of independent directors or the requirement that our independent directors approve related party transactions without the approval of two thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by our stockholders.

Our multifamily and commercial real estate lending, servicing and asset management businesses are subject, in certain instances, to supervision and regulation by federal and state governmental authorities in the U.S. In addition, these businesses may be subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing various requirements and restrictions, which, among other things, regulate lending activities and conduct with borrowers, establish maximum interest rates, finance charges and other charges, require disclosures to borrowers and prohibit illegal discrimination. Although many states do not regulate commercial finance, certain states impose limitations on interest rates, as well as other charges on certain collection practices and creditor remedies. Some states also require licensing of lenders, loan brokers and loan servicers and adequate disclosure of certain contract terms. We are required to comply with certain provisions of, among other statutes and regulations, the USA PATRIOT Act, regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control and other federal and state securities laws and regulations. These legal and regulatory requirements that apply to us are subject to change from time to time and may become more restrictive, making compliance with applicable requirements more difficult, expensive or otherwise restrict our ability to conduct our business in the manner that it is now conducted.

Properties that we may acquire directly or indirectly through partnerships, and the properties underlying our structured finance investments and mortgage-related securities, are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations. Under these laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner of real estate (including, in certain circumstances, a secured lender that acquires ownership or control of a property) may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at, on, under or in its property. These laws typically impose cleanup responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or control party knew of or was responsible for the release or presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of investigation, remediation or removal of these substances may be substantial and could exceed the value of the property. An owner or control party of a site may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a site. Certain environmental laws also impose liability in connection with the handling of or exposure to materials containing asbestos. These laws allow third parties to seek recovery from owners of real properties for personal injuries associated with materials containing asbestos. Our operating costs and the values of these assets may be adversely affected by the obligation to pay for the cost of complying with existing environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, as well as the cost of complying with future legislation, and our income and ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be affected adversely by the existence of an environmental liability with respect to properties we may acquire. We endeavor to ensure these properties are in compliance in all material respects with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products.

To maintain our status as an approved lender for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and as a HUD-approved mortgagee and issuer of Ginnie Mae securities, we are required to meet and maintain various eligibility criteria established by these entities, such as minimum net worth, operational liquidity and collateral requirements and compliance with reporting requirements. We are required to originate loans and perform our loan servicing functions in accordance with the applicable program requirements and guidelines established by these agencies. If we fail to comply with the requirements of any of these programs, the agencies may terminate or withdraw our licenses and approvals to participate in the GSE or HUD programs. In addition, the agencies have the authority under their guidelines to terminate a lender's authority to sell loans to it and service their loans. The loss of one or more of these approvals would have a material adverse impact on our operations and could result in further disqualification with other counterparties.

We face significant competition across our business, including, but not limited to, other mortgage REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, other lenders, governmental bodies and other entities, some of which may have greater name recognition, financial resources and lower costs of capital available to them. In addition, there are numerous institutions with asset acquisition objectives similar to ours, and others may be organized in the future which may increase competition. Competitive variables include market presence and visibility, size of loans offered and underwriting standards. To the extent that a competitor is willing to risk larger amounts of capital in a particular transaction or to employ more liberal underwriting standards when evaluating potential loans, our origination volume and profit margins for our investment portfolio could be impacted. Our competitors may also be willing to accept lower returns on their investments and may succeed in buying the assets that we have targeted for acquisition.

We compete on the basis of quality of service, relationships, loan structure, terms, pricing and industry experience, including the knowledge of local and national commercial real estate market conditions, loan product expertise and the ability to analyze and manage credit risk. Our competitors also seek to compete aggressively on the basis of these factors and our success depends on the ability to offer attractive loan products, provide superior service, demonstrate its industry knowledge and experience, maintain and capitalize on relationships with investors, borrowers and key loan correspondents and remain competitive in pricing. In addition, future changes in laws, regulations and GSE/HUD program requirements, and consolidation in the commercial real estate finance market could lead to the entry of more competitors, or enhance the competitive strength of our existing competitors.

Although we believe we are well positioned to continue to compete effectively in each facet of our business, there can be no assurance that we will do so or that we will not encounter increased competition in the future that could limit our ability to compete effectively.

At December 31, 2017, we employed 445 individuals, none of which are represented by a union or subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

Our internet address is www.arbor.com. All of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") are made available free of charge through our website, including this report, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to such reports, if any, as filed with the SEC as soon as reasonably practicable after such filing. Our website also contains our code of business conduct and ethics, code of ethics for chief executive and senior financial officers, corporate governance guidelines, stockholder communications with the Board of Directors, and the charters of the committees of our Board of Directors. No information contained in or linked to our website is incorporated by reference in this report.

Our business is subject to various risks, including the risks listed below. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected and the value of our common stock could decline. The below listed risk factors should not be considered an all inclusive list. New risk factors emerge periodically and we cannot guarantee that the factors described below list all risks that may become material to us at any later time. Some of the risk factors discussed below may have different impacts on our Structured and Agency Businesses.

An economic slowdown, a lengthy or severe recession, or declining real estate values could harm our operations.

We believe the risks associated with our business are more severe during periods of economic downturn if these periods are accompanied by declining real estate values. Declining real estate values would likely limit our new mortgage loan originations, since borrowers often use increases in the value of their existing properties to support the purchase or investment in additional properties. Borrowers may also be less able to pay principal and interest on our loans if the real estate economy weakens. Declining real estate values also significantly increase the likelihood that we will incur losses on our loans in the event of default because the value of our collateral may be insufficient to cover our cost on the loan. Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could adversely affect both our net interest income from loans in our portfolio as well as our ability to

originate, sell and securitize loans, which would significantly harm our results of operations, financial condition, business prospects and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.

Prolonged disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on us and the market price of our common stock.

Commercial real estate is particularly adversely affected by a prolonged economic downturn and liquidity crisis, which last occurred in 2007 through 2010. These circumstances materially impact liquidity in the financial markets and result in the scarcity of certain types of financing, and, in certain cases, make certain financing terms less attractive. If economic or market conditions deteriorate, and these adverse conditions return, lending institutions may be forced to exit markets such as repurchase lending, become insolvent, further tighten their lending standards or increase the amount of equity capital required to obtain financing, and in such event, could make it more difficult for us to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all. Our profitability will be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain cost-effective financing for our investments. In addition, these factors may make it more difficult for our borrowers to repay our loans as they may experience difficulties in selling assets, increased costs of financing or obtaining financing at all. These events may also make it more difficult or unlikely for us to raise capital through the issuance of our common stock or preferred stock. These disruptions in the financial markets also may have a material adverse effect on the market value of our common stock and other adverse effects on us.

Increases in loan loss reserves and other impairments are likely if economic conditions deteriorate.

A decline in economic conditions could negatively impact the credit quality of our loan and investment portfolio and could cause us to experience increases in loan loss reserves, potential defaults and other asset impairment charges.

Loan loss reserves are particularly difficult to estimate in a turbulent economic environment.

We perform an evaluation of our loans on a quarterly basis to determine whether an impairment charge is necessary and adequate to absorb probable losses. The valuation process for our loan and investment portfolio requires us to make certain estimates and judgments, which are particularly difficult to determine during a period in which the available commercial real estate credit is limited and commercial real estate transactions have decreased. Our estimates and judgments are based on a number of factors, including projected cash flows from the collateral securing our commercial real estate loans, loan structure, including the availability of reserves and recourse guarantees, likelihood of repayment in full at loan maturity, potential for a refinancing market coming back to commercial real estate in the future and expected market discount rates for varying property types. If our estimates and judgments are not correct, our results of operations and financial condition could be severely impacted.

In a market in which liquidity is essential to our business, particularly our Structured Business, loan repayments have been a significant source of liquidity for us. If borrowers are unable to refinance loans at maturity, the loans could go into default and the liquidity that we would receive from such repayments will not be available. Furthermore, in the event the commercial real estate finance market deteriorates, borrowers that are performing on their loans will most likely extend such loans if they have that right, which will further delay our ability to access liquidity through repayments.

We may not be able to access the debt or equity capital markets on favorable terms, or at all, for additional liquidity, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Additional liquidity, future equity or debt financing may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all. Our ability to access additional debt and equity capital depends on various conditions in these markets, which are beyond our control. If we are able to complete future equity offerings, they could be dilutive to our existing stockholders or could result in the issuance of securities that have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of our other securities. Our inability to obtain adequate capital could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results.

We may be unable to invest excess equity capital on acceptable terms or at all, which would adversely affect our operating results.

We may not be able to identify investments that meet our investment criteria and we may not be successful in closing the investments that we identify. In addition, the investments that we acquire with our equity capital may not produce a return on capital. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify attractive opportunities to invest our equity capital, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Changes in market conditions could adversely affect the market price of our stock.

As with other publicly traded equity securities, the value of our stock depends on various market conditions which change from time to time. Among the market conditions that may affect the value of our stock are the following:

The market value of our stock is based primarily upon the market's perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and dividends. Consequently, our stock may trade at prices that are higher or lower than our book value per share of stock. If our future earnings or dividends are less than expected, it is likely that the market price of our stock will diminish.

A declining portfolio could adversely affect the returns from our investments.

Conditions in the capital markets could lead to a reduction in our loan and investment portfolio. If we do not have the opportunity to originate quality investments to replace the reductions in our portfolio, this reduction will likely result in reduced returns from our investments.

Rising interest rates could have an adverse effect on a borrower's ability to make interest payments.

A significant portion of our loans and borrowings in our Structured Business are variable-rate instruments based on LIBOR. However, a portion of our loan portfolio is fixed-rate or is subject to interest rate floors that limit the impact of a decrease in interest rates. In addition, certain of our borrowings are also fixed rate or may be subject to interest rate swaps that hedge our exposure to interest rate risk on fixed rate loans financed with variable rate debt. As a result, the impact of a change in interest rates may be different on our interest income than it is on our interest expense. In the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, defaults could increase and result in credit losses to us, which could adversely affect our liquidity and operating

results. Further, such delinquencies or defaults could have an adverse effect on the spreads between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

We depend on key personnel with long standing business relationships, the loss of whom could threaten our ability to operate our business successfully.

Our future success depends, to a significant extent, upon the continued services of key personnel. In particular, the mortgage lending experience of our chief executive officer and executive vice president of structured finance, and the extent and nature of relationships they have developed with developers and owners of multifamily and commercial properties and other financial institutions, are critical to our success. We cannot assure their continued employment as our officers. The loss of services of one or more members of our management team could harm our business and our prospects.

The real estate investment business is highly competitive. Our success depends on our ability to compete with other providers of capital for real estate investments.

Our business is highly competitive. Competition may cause us to accept economic or structural features in our investments, particularly in our Structured Business, that we would not have otherwise accepted and it may cause us to search for investments in markets outside of our traditional product expertise. We compete for attractive investments with traditional lending sources, such as insurance companies and banks, as well as other REITs, specialty finance companies and private equity vehicles with similar investment objectives, which may make it more difficult for us to consummate our target investments. Many of our competitors have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do, which provides them with greater operating flexibility and a competitive advantage relative to us.

We originate or acquire investments based on our estimates or projections of overall rates of return on such investments, which in turn are based upon, among other considerations, assumptions regarding the performance of assets, the amount and terms of available financing to obtain desired leverage and the manner and timing of dispositions, including possible asset recovery and remediation strategies, all of which are subject to significant uncertainty. In addition, events or conditions that we have not anticipated may occur and may have a significant effect on the actual rate of return received on an investment. As we acquire or originate investments, whether as new additions or as replacements for maturing investments, there can be no assurance that we will be able to produce rates of return comparable to returns on our previous or existing investments.

Our due diligence may not reveal all of a borrower's liabilities and may not reveal other weaknesses in its business.

Before making a loan to a borrower, we assess the strength and skills of such entity's management and other factors we believe are material to the performance of the investment. In performing our due diligence, we rely on the resources available to us and, in some cases, an investigation by third parties. This process is particularly important and subjective with respect to newly organized entities because there may be little or no information publicly available about the entities. There can be no assurance that our due diligence process will uncover all relevant facts or that any investment will be successful.

We invest in junior participation loans which may be subject to additional risks relating to the privately negotiated structure and terms of the transaction, which may result in losses to us.

In our Structured Business, we invest in junior participation loans which are mortgage loans typically (i) secured by a first mortgage on a single commercial property or group of related properties

and (ii) subordinated to a senior note secured by the same first mortgage on the same collateral. As a result, if a borrower defaults, there may not be sufficient funds remaining for the junior participation loan after payment is made to the senior note holder. Since each transaction is privately negotiated, junior participation loans can vary in their structural characteristics and risks. For example, the rights of holders of junior participation loans to control the process following a borrower default may be limited in certain investments. We cannot predict the terms of each junior participation investment. A junior participation may not be liquid and, consequently, we may be unable to dispose of underperforming or non-performing investments. The higher risks associated with a subordinate position in any investment we make could subject us to increased risk of losses.

We invest in mezzanine loans which are subject to a greater risk of loss than loans with a first priority lien on the underlying real estate.

In our Structured Business, we invest in mezzanine loans that take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the property or a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the property. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income producing real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan to value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal.

Preferred equity investments involve a greater risk of loss than traditional debt financing.

In our Structured Business, we invest in preferred equity investments, which involve a higher degree of risk than traditional debt financing due to a variety of factors, including that such investments are subordinate to other loans and are not secured by property underlying the investment. Furthermore, should the issuer default on our investment, we would only be able to proceed against the partnership in which we have an interest, and not the property underlying our investment. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment.

We invest in multifamily and commercial real estate loans, which may involve a greater risk of loss than single family real estate loans.

Our investments include multifamily and commercial real estate loans that involve a higher degree of risk than single family residential lending because of a variety of factors, including generally larger loan balances, dependency for repayment on successful operation of the mortgaged property and tenant businesses operating therein, and loan terms that include amortization schedules longer than the stated maturity and provide for balloon payments at stated maturity rather than periodic principal payments. In addition, the value of commercial real estate can be affected significantly by the supply and demand in the market for that type of property.

Volatility of values of multifamily and commercial properties may adversely affect our loans and investments.

Multifamily and commercial property values and net operating income derived from such properties are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, events such as natural disasters, including hurricanes and earthquakes, acts of war and/or terrorism and others that may cause unanticipated and uninsured performance declines and/or

losses to us or the owners and operators of the real estate securing our investment; national, regional and local economic conditions, such as what we have experienced in recent years (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors); local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of housing, retail, industrial, office or other commercial space); changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; construction quality, construction cost, age and design; demographic factors; retroactive changes to building or similar codes; and increases in operating expenses (such as energy costs). In the event a property's net operating income decreases, a borrower may have difficulty repaying our loan, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our loans, which could also cause us to suffer losses.

Many of our commercial real estate loans are funded with interest reserves and our borrowers may be unable to replenish those interest reserves once they run out.

Given the transitional nature of many of our commercial real estate loans in our Structured Business portfolio, we often require borrowers to post reserves to cover interest and operating expenses until the property cash flows are projected to increase sufficiently to cover debt service costs. We also generally require the borrower to replenish reserves if they become depleted due to underperformance or if the borrower wants to exercise extension options under the loan. Despite low interest rates, revenues on the properties underlying any commercial real estate loan investments would decrease in an economic downturn, making it more difficult for borrowers to meet their payment obligations to us. In the future, some borrowers may continue to have difficulty servicing our debt and will not have sufficient capital to replenish reserves, which could have a significant impact on our operating results and cash flows.

Our ability to manage our structured portfolio of loans and investments may be limited by the form in which they are made. In certain situations, we may acquire investments subject to rights of senior classes and servicers under inter-creditor or servicing agreements; acquire only a participation in an underlying investment; co-invest with third parties through partnerships, joint ventures or other entities, thereby acquiring non-controlling interests; or rely on independent third party management or strategic partners with respect to the management of an asset. Therefore, we may not be able to exercise control over the loan or investment. Such financial assets may involve risks not present in investments where senior creditors, servicers or third party controlling investors are not involved. Our rights to control the process following a borrower default may be subject to the rights of senior creditors or servicers whose interests may not be aligned with ours. A third party partner may have financial difficulties resulting in a negative impact on such assets and may have economic or business interests or goals which are inconsistent with ours. In addition, we may, in certain circumstances, be liable for the actions of our third party partners.

We may obtain real estate properties through foreclosure proceedings or investment. Such properties may not perform as expected and may subject us to unknown liabilities relating to such properties for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination or claims by tenants, vendors or other persons against the former owners of the properties. Inaccurate assumptions regarding future rental or occupancy rates could result in overly optimistic estimates of future revenues. In addition, future operating expenses or the costs necessary to bring an obtained property up to standards established for its intended market position may be underestimated.

The adverse resolution of a lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The adverse resolution of litigation for which we have been named as a defendant could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See Note 16—Commitments and Contingencies for information on our current litigation.

The impact of any future terrorist attacks and the availability of terrorism insurance expose us to certain risks.

Any future terrorist attacks, the anticipation of any such attacks, and the consequences of any military or other response by the U.S. and its allies may have an adverse impact on the U.S. financial markets and the economy in general. We cannot predict the severity of the effect that any such future events would have on the U.S. financial markets, including the real estate capital markets, the economy or our business. Any future terrorist attacks could adversely affect the credit quality of some of our loans and investments. Some of our loans and investments will be more susceptible to such adverse effects than others. We may suffer losses as a result of the adverse impact of any future terrorist attacks and these losses may adversely impact our results of operations.

The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, or the TRIA, and other current legislation, requires insurers to make terrorism insurance available under their property and casualty insurance policies in order to receive federal compensation under TRIA for insured losses. However, this legislation does not regulate the pricing of such insurance. The absence of affordable insurance coverage may adversely affect the general real estate lending market, lending volume and the market's overall liquidity and may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us and the pace at which we are able to make investments. If the properties that we invest in are unable to obtain affordable insurance coverage, the value of those investments could decline and in the event of an uninsured loss, we could lose all or a portion of our investment.

Failure to maintain an exemption from regulation as an investment company under the Investment Company Act would adversely affect our results of operations.

We believe that we conduct, and we intend to conduct our business in a manner that allows us to avoid being regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Pursuant to Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act, entities that are primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring "mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate" are currently exempted from regulation thereunder. The staff of the SEC has provided guidance on the availability of this exemption. Specifically, the staff's position generally requires a company to maintain at least 55% of its assets directly in "qualifying real estate interests." To constitute as a qualifying real estate interest under this 55% test, an interest in real estate must meet various criteria. Loans that are secured by equity interests in entities that directly or indirectly own the underlying real property, rather than a mortgage on the underlying property itself, and ownership of equity interests in real property owners may not qualify for purposes of the 55% test depending on the type of entity. Mortgage-related securities that do not represent all of the certificates issued with respect to an underlying pool of mortgages may also not qualify for purposes of the 55% test. Therefore, our ownership of these types of loans and equity interests may be limited by the provisions of the Investment Company Act. There can be no assurance that the laws and regulations governing the Investment Company Act status of REITs, including the guidance of the Division of Investment Management of the SEC regarding this exemption, will not change in a manner that adversely affects our operations. To the extent that we do not comply with the 55% test, another exemption or exclusion from registration as an investment company under that Act or other interpretations under the Investment Company Act, or if the SEC no longer permits our exemption, we may be deemed to be an investment company. If we fail to maintain an exemption or other exclusion from registration as an investment company we could, among other

things, be required either (a) to substantially change the manner in which we conduct our operations to avoid being required to register as an investment company or (b) to register as an investment company, either of which could have an adverse effect on us and the market price of our common stock. If we were required to register as an investment company under that Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act), portfolio composition, including restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration and other matters.

One of our subsidiaries is required to register under the Investment Advisors Act, and is subject to regulation under that Act.

One of our subsidiaries is subject to the extensive regulation prescribed by the Investment Advisers Act. The SEC oversees activities as a registered investment adviser under this regulatory regime. A failure to comply with the obligations imposed by the Investment Advisers Act, including record-keeping, advertising and operating requirements, disclosure obligations and prohibitions on fraudulent activities, could result in fines, censure, suspensions of personnel or investing activities or other sanctions, including revocation of our registration as an investment adviser. The regulations under the Investment Advisers Act are designed primarily to protect investors and other clients, and are not designed to protect holders of our publicly traded stock. Even if a sanction imposed against our subsidiary or its personnel involves a small monetary amount, the adverse publicity related to such sanction could harm our reputation and our relationship with our investors and impede our ability to raise additional capital. In addition, compliance with the Investment Advisors Act may require us to incur additional costs, and these costs may be material.

The impact of any future laws, as well as amendments to current laws, may place restrictions on our business.

Future legislation could impose additional financial obligations or restrictions with respect to our business. The past economic environment has placed an increased level of scrutiny on the financial services sector, which led to the signing of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010. Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on us and, more generally, the financial services and mortgage industries. It is difficult to predict the exact nature of any future legislation and the extent to which such legislation, if any, will impact our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

The effects of government regulation could negatively impact the market value of loans related to development projects.

Loans related to development projects bear additional risk in that government regulation could impact the value of the project by limiting the development of the property. If the proper approvals for the completion of the project are not granted, the value of the collateral may be adversely affected which may negatively impact the value of the loan.

We may not be able to access financing sources on favorable terms, or at all, which could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.

We generally finance our Structured Business loans and investments through a variety of means, including credit facilities, senior unsecured notes, junior subordinated notes, CLOs and other structured financings. We generally finance our Agency Business loan originations, prior to sale to, or securitization by, an agency, through credit facilities provided by commercial banks. Our ability to execute this strategy depends on various conditions in the markets for financing in this manner that are

beyond our control, including lack of liquidity and wider credit spreads, which we have seen over the past several years. If conditions deteriorate, we cannot assure that these sources are feasible as a means of financing as there can be no assurance that any existing agreements will be renewed or extended at expiration. If our strategy is not viable, we will have to find alternative forms of long-term and short-term financing as credit and repurchase facilities may not accommodate our needs. This could subject us to more recourse indebtedness and the risk that debt service on less efficient forms of financing would require a larger portion of our cash flows, thereby reducing cash available for distribution to our stockholders, funds available for operations as well as for future business opportunities.

Credit facilities may contain restrictive covenants relating to our operations.

Credit facilities may contain various financial covenants and restrictions, including minimum net worth, liquidity and debt-to-equity ratios. Other restrictive covenants contained in credit facility agreements may include covenants that prohibit affecting a change in control, disposing of or encumbering assets being financed, maximum debt balance requirements, and restrictions from making material amendments to underwriting guidelines without lender approval. While we actively manage our loan and investment portfolio, a weak economic environment will make maintaining compliance with future credit facilities' covenants more difficult. If we are not in compliance with any of these covenants, there can be no assurance that our lenders would waive or amend such non-compliance in the future and any such non-compliance could have a material adverse effect on us.

We may not be able to obtain the level of leverage necessary to optimize our return on investment.

In our Structured Business, our return on investment depends, in part, upon our ability to grow our portfolio of invested assets through the use of leverage at a cost of debt that is lower than the yield earned on our investments. We typically obtain leverage through the issuance of CLOs, credit agreements and other borrowings. Our future ability to obtain the necessary leverage on beneficial terms ultimately depends upon the quality of the portfolio assets that collateralize our indebtedness. Our failure to obtain and/or maintain leverage at desired levels or on attractive terms would have a material adverse effect on the performance of our Structured Business. Moreover, we may be dependent upon a few lenders to provide financing under credit agreements for our origination or acquisition of loans and investments and there can be no assurance that these agreements will be renewed or extended at expiration. Our ability to obtain financing through CLOs is subject to conditions in the debt capital markets which are impacted by factors beyond our control that may at times be adverse and reduce the level of investor demand for such securities.

The debt facilities that we may use to finance our investments may require us to provide additional collateral.

We may use credit facilities and repurchase agreements to finance investments in the future. If the market value of the loans or investments pledged or sold by us to a funding source decline in value, we may be required by the lender to provide additional collateral or pay down a portion of the funds advanced. We may not have the funds available to pay down such future debt, which could result in defaults. Posting additional collateral to support these potential credit facilities would reduce our liquidity and limit our ability to leverage our assets. In the event we do not have sufficient liquidity to meet such requirements, lenders can accelerate the indebtedness, increase interest rates and terminate our ability to borrow. Further, lenders may require us to maintain a certain amount of uninvested cash or set aside unlevered assets sufficient to maintain a specified liquidity position which would allow us to satisfy our collateral obligations. As a result, we may not be able to leverage our assets as fully as we would choose, which could reduce our return on assets. In the event that we are unable to meet these collateral obligations, our financial condition could deteriorate rapidly.

Our use of leverage may create a mismatch with the duration and index of the investments that we are financing.

We attempt to structure our leverage, particularly in our Structured Business, such that we minimize the difference between the term of our investments and the term of the leverage we use to finance the investment. In the event our leverage is for a shorter term than the financed investment, we may not be able to extend or find appropriate replacement leverage and that would have an adverse impact on our liquidity and our returns. In the event our leverage is for a longer term than the financed investment, we may not be able to repay such leverage or replace the financed investment with an optimal substitute or at all, which will negatively impact our desired leveraged returns.

We attempt to structure our leverage such that we minimize the difference between the index of our investments and the index of our leverage-financing floating rate investments with floating rate leverage and fixed rate investments with fixed rate leverage. If such a product is not available to us from our lenders on reasonable terms, we may use hedging instruments to effectively create such a match. For example, in the case of fixed rate investments, we may finance such an investment with floating rate leverage, but effectively convert all or a portion of the leverage to fixed rate using hedging strategies. Our attempts to mitigate such risk are subject to factors outside of our control, such as the availability to us of favorable financing and hedging options, which is subject to a variety of factors, of which duration and term matching are only two such factors.

We utilize a significant amount of debt to finance our portfolio, which may subject us to an increased risk of loss, adversely affecting the return on our investments and reducing cash available for distribution.

We utilize a significant amount of debt to finance our operations, which may compound losses and reduce the cash available for distributions to our stockholders. We generally leverage our portfolio through the use of securitizations, including the issuance of CLOs, bank credit facilities, and other borrowings. The leverage we employ varies depending on the types of assets being financed, availability of funds, ability to obtain credit facilities, the loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios of our assets, the yield on our assets, the targeted leveraged return we expect from our portfolio and our ability to meet ongoing covenants related to our asset mix and financial performance. Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral for our borrowings. In addition, we may acquire real estate property subject to debt obligations. The return on our investments and cash available for distribution to our stockholders may be reduced to the extent that changes in market conditions cause the cost of our financing to increase relative to the income that we can derive from the assets we acquire.

Our debt service payments reduce the net income available for distributions. Moreover, we may not be able to meet our debt service obligations and, to the extent we cannot, we risk the loss of some or all of our assets to foreclosure or sale to satisfy our debt obligations. Currently, neither our charter nor our bylaws impose any limitations on the extent to which we may leverage our assets.

We may guarantee the performance of some of our obligations in the future, including but not limited to any repurchase agreements, derivative agreements, and unsecured indebtedness. Non-performance on such obligations may cause losses to us in excess of the capital we initially may invest/commit to under such obligations and there is no assurance that we will have sufficient capital to cover any such losses.

We may not be able to acquire suitable investments for a CLO issuance, or we may not be able to issue CLOs on attractive terms, or at all, which may require us to utilize more costly financing for our investments.

We have financed, and, if the opportunities exist in the future, we may continue to finance certain of our investments in our Structured Business through the issuance of CLOs. During the period we are

acquiring investments for eventual long-term financing through CLOs, we have typically financed these investments through repurchase and credit agreements. We use these agreements to finance our acquisition of investments until we have accumulated a sufficient quantity of investments, at which time we may refinance them through a CLO securitization. As a result, we are subject to the risk that we will not be able to acquire a sufficient amount of eligible investments to maximize the efficiency of a CLO issuance. In addition, conditions in the debt capital markets may make the issuance of CLOs less attractive to us even when we do have a sufficient pool of collateral, or we may not be able to execute a CLO transaction on terms favorable to us or at all. If we are unable to issue a CLO to finance these investments, we may be required to utilize other forms of potentially less attractive financing.

The use of CLO financings with over-collateralization and interest coverage requirements may have a negative impact on our cash flows.

The terms of CLOs will generally provide that the principal amount of investments must exceed the principal balance of the related bonds by a certain amount and that interest income exceeds interest expense by a certain amount. Generally, CLO terms provide that, if certain delinquencies and/or losses or other factors cause a decline in collateral or cash flow levels, the cash flow otherwise payable on subordinated classes may be redirected to repay senior classes of CLOs until the issuer or the collateral is in compliance with the terms of the governing documents. Other tests (based on delinquency levels or other criteria) may restrict our ability to receive interest payments from assets pledged to secure CLOs. We cannot assure that the performance tests will be satisfied. If our investments fail to perform as anticipated, our over-collateralization, interest coverage or other credit enhancement expense associated with our CLOs will increase. With respect to future CLOs we may issue, we cannot assure, in advance of completing negotiations with the rating agencies or other key transaction parties as to the actual terms of the delinquency tests, over-collateralization and interest coverage terms, cash flow release mechanisms or other significant factors upon which net income to us will be calculated. Failure to obtain favorable terms with regard to these matters may adversely affect the availability of net income to us.

We may not be able to find suitable replacement investments for CLO reinvestment periods.

CLOs have periods where principal proceeds received from assets securing the CLO can be reinvested for a defined period of time, commonly referred to as a reinvestment period. Our ability to find suitable investments during the reinvestment period that meet the criteria set forth in the CLO governing documents and by rating agencies may determine the success of our CLOs. Our potential inability to find suitable investments may cause, among other things, lower returns, interest deficiencies, hyper-amortization of the senior CLO liabilities and may cause us to reduce the life of the CLO and accelerate the amortization of certain fees and expenses.

We may be required to repurchase loans that we have sold or to indemnify holders of our CLOs.

If any of the loans we originate or acquire and sell or securitize through CLOs do not comply with representations and warranties we make about certain characteristics of the loans, the borrowers and the underlying properties, we may be required to repurchase those loans or replace them with substitute loans. In addition, in the case of loans that we have sold instead of retained, we may be required to indemnify persons for losses or expenses incurred as a result of a breach of a representation or warranty. Repurchased loans typically require a significant allocation of working capital to carry on our books, and our ability to borrow against such assets is limited. Any significant repurchases or indemnification payments could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Our loans and investments may be subject to fluctuations in interest rates which may not be adequately protected, or protected at all, by our hedging strategies.

Our current investment strategy for our Structured Business emphasizes loans with both floating and fixed interest rates. Floating rate investments earn interest at rates that adjust from time to time (typically monthly) based upon an index (typically LIBOR), allowing this portion of our portfolio to be insulated from changes in value due specifically to changes in interest rates. Fixed rate investments, however, do not have adjusting interest rates and, as prevailing interest rates change, the relative value of the fixed cash flows from these investments will cause potentially significant changes in value. The majority of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities in our Structured Business have floating rates of interest. However, depending on market conditions, fixed rate assets may become a greater portion of our new loan originations. We may employ various hedging strategies to limit the effects of changes in interest rates (and in some cases credit spreads), including engaging in interest rate swaps, caps, floors and other interest rate derivative products. No strategy can completely insulate us from the risks associated with interest rate changes and there is a risk that they may provide no protection at all and potentially compound the impact of changes in interest rates. Hedging transactions involve certain additional risks such as counterparty risk, the legal enforceability of hedging contracts, the early repayment of hedged transactions and the risk that unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates may cause a significant loss of basis in the contract and a change in current period expense. We cannot make assurances that we will be able to enter into hedging transactions or that such hedging transactions will adequately protect us against the foregoing risks. In addition, cash flow hedges which are not perfectly correlated (and appropriately designated and documented as such) with a variable rate financing will impact our reported income as gains and losses on the ineffective portion of such hedges will be recorded on our statement of income.

Hedging instruments often are not guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house and involve risks and costs.

The cost of using hedging instruments increases during periods of rising and volatile interest rates and as the period covered by the instrument lengthens. We may increase our hedging activity and thus increase our hedging costs during periods when interest rates are volatile or rising and hedging costs have increased.

In addition, hedging instruments involve risk since they currently are often not guaranteed by an exchange or clearing house. The enforceability of agreements underlying derivative transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory, commodity and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. The business failure of a hedging counterparty with whom we enter into a hedging transaction will most likely result in a default. Default by a party with whom we enter into a hedging transaction may result in the loss of unrealized profits and force us to cover our resale commitments, if any, at the then current market price. Although generally we will seek to reserve the right to terminate our hedging positions, it may not always be possible to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty, and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract to cover our risk. We cannot assure that a liquid secondary market will exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may be required to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in losses.

We may enter into derivative contracts that could expose us to contingent liabilities in the future.

Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, part of our investment strategy involves entering into derivative contracts that could require us to fund cash payments in the future under certain circumstances (e.g., the early termination of the derivative agreement caused by an event of default or other early termination event, or the decision by a counterparty to request margin securities it is contractually owed under the terms of the derivative contract). The amount due would be equal to

the unrealized loss of the open swap positions with the respective counterparty and could also include other fees and charges. These economic losses will be reflected in our financial results of operations, and our ability to fund these obligations will depend on the liquidity of our assets and access to capital at the time, and the need to fund these obligations could adversely impact our financial condition.

We are subject to certain counterparty risks related to our derivative contracts.

We periodically hedge a portion of our interest rate risk by entering into derivative financial instrument contracts. In a global credit crisis, there is a risk that counterparties could fail, shut down, file for bankruptcy or be unable to pay out contracts. The failure of a counterparty that holds collateral we post in connection with certain interest rate swap agreements could result in the loss of such collateral.

Our investments financed in foreign locations may involve significant risks.

We have financed, and, if the opportunities exist in the future, we may continue to finance, certain of our investments outside of the U.S. Financing investments in foreign locations may expose us to additional risks not typically inherent in the U.S. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets, the lack of available information, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility.

Although our current transaction outside the U.S. is denominated in U.S. dollars, future transactions may be denominated in a foreign currency, which would subject us to the risk that the value of a particular currency may change in relation to the U.S. dollar. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize such risk, but we can offer no assurance that we will, in fact, hedge currency risk or, that if we do, such strategies will be effective. As a result, a change in currency exchange rates may adversely affect our profitability if future transactions outside the U.S. are denominated in a foreign currency.

The loss of, or changes in, our Agency Business's relationships with the GSEs, U.S. Department of HUD and institutional investors would adversely affect our ability to originate commercial real estate loans through GSE and HUD programs, which would materially and adversely affect us.

Currently, the Agency Business originates nearly all of its loans for sale through GSE and HUD programs. The Agency Business is approved as a Fannie Mae DUS lender nationwide, a Freddie Mac Program Plus lender in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, a Freddie Mac Targeted Affordable Housing, Manufactured Housing Community, Seniors Housing and SBL lender nationwide, a HUD MAP and LEAN lender nationwide, and a Ginnie Mae issuer. Our status as an approved lender affords us a number of advantages and may be terminated by the applicable GSE or HUD at any time. The loss of such status would, or changes in our relationships could, prevent us from being able to originate commercial real estate loans for sale through the particular GSE or HUD, which would materially and adversely affect us. It could also result in a loss of similar approvals from other GSEs or HUD.

We also originate and sell loans to investment banks through the CMBS conduit markets. If these investment banks discontinue their relationship with us and replacement investors cannot be found on a timely basis, we could be adversely affected.

A change to the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related actions, along with any changes in laws and regulations affecting the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. federal government, could materially and adversely affect our Agency Business.

Currently, the Agency Business originates nearly all of its loans for sale through GSE and HUD programs. Additionally, a substantial majority of our servicing rights are derived from loans we sell through GSE and HUD programs. Changes in the business charters, structure, or existence of one or both of the GSEs could eliminate or substantially reduce the number of loans we may originate with the GSEs, which in turn would lead to a reduction in fee and interest income we derive with respect to such loans and would also adversely affect our servicing revenue. These effects would likely cause our Agency Business to realize significantly lower revenues from loan originations and servicing fees and ultimately would have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA"), the GSEs' regulator, placed each GSE into conservatorship in 2008. The conservatorship is a statutory process designed to preserve and conserve the GSEs' assets and property and put them in a sound and solvent condition. The conservatorships have no specified termination dates and there continues to be significant uncertainty regarding the future of the GSEs, including how long they will continue to exist in their current forms, the extent of their roles in the housing markets, what forms they will have and whether they will continue to exist following conservatorship. In 2014, the FHFA released its strategic plan for the GSEs, in which it changed its goal of "contraction" of the GSEs' multifamily businesses to "maintaining" the businesses.

Congress has continued to consider housing finance reform. In the past few years, members of Congress introduced several bills to reform the housing finance system, including the GSEs. Several of the bills require the wind down or receivership of the GSEs within a specified period of enactment and place certain restrictions on the GSEs' activities prior to being wound down or placed into receivership. The Trump Administration has made comments indicating that housing finance reform may be on their agenda, however, it is unclear at this time what their goals are with respect to the future of the GSE's.

We expect Congress will continue to consider housing finance reform, including conducting hearings and considering legislation that would alter the housing finance system, including the activities or operations of the GSEs. We cannot predict the prospects for the enactment, timing or content of legislative proposals regarding the future status of the GSEs. As a result, there continues to be significant uncertainty regarding the future of the GSEs.

In November 2017, the FHFA released the GSE 2018 Scorecard ("2018 Scorecard,") which established Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's loan origination caps at $35.0 billion ("2018 Caps") each for the multifamily finance market, a $1.5 billion decrease from the 2017 loan origination caps. Affordable housing loans, loans to small multifamily properties, and manufactured housing rental community loans continue to be excluded from the 2018 Caps. In addition, the definition of the affordable loan exclusions has added an extremely-high cost market category, continues to encompass affordable housing in high- and very-high cost markets and allows for an exclusion from the 2018 Caps for the pro-rata portion of any loan on a multifamily property that includes affordable units. The 2018 Scorecard continues to provide FHFA the flexibility to review the estimated size of the multifamily loan origination market quarterly and proactively adjust the 2018 Caps accordingly. The 2018 Scorecard also continues to provide exclusions for loans to properties in underserved markets and for loans to finance certain energy or water efficiency improvements, however, to qualify for this exclusion, the projected annual energy or water savings must be at least 25%. Our originations with the GSEs are highly profitable executions as they provide significant gains from the sale of our loans, non-cash gains related

to MSRs and servicing revenues. Therefore, a decline in our GSE originations would negatively impact our financial results. We are unsure whether the FHFA will impose stricter limitations on GSE multifamily production volume in the future.

Our Agency Business is subject to risk of loss in connection with defaults on loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.

Under the Fannie Mae DUS program, our Agency Business originates and services multifamily loans for Fannie Mae without having to obtain Fannie Mae's prior approval for certain loans, as long as the loans meet the underwriting guidelines set forth by Fannie Mae. In return for the delegated authority to make loans and the commitment to purchase loans by Fannie Mae, we must maintain minimum collateral with Fannie Mae and we are required to share risk of loss on loans sold through Fannie Mae. Under the full risk-sharing formula, we absorb the first 5% of any losses on the UPB of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we share the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss capped at 20% of the original UPB of a loan. Our Agency Business has modified its risk-sharing obligations on some Fannie Mae DUS loans to reduce potential loss exposure on those loans. In addition, Fannie Mae can double or triple our risk-sharing obligations if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae. As of December 31, 2017, the Agency Business had pledged $42.0 million as collateral against future losses under $12.50 billion of loans outstanding that are subject to risk-sharing obligations. Fannie Mae collateral requirements may change in the future. As of December 31, 2017, the Agency Business's allowance for loss-sharing balance was $30.5 million. We cannot ensure that this balance will be sufficient to cover future loss sharing obligations. While our Agency Business originates loans that meet the underwriting guidelines defined by Fannie Mae, in addition to our own internal underwriting guidelines, underwriting criteria may not always protect against loan defaults. Other factors may also affect a borrower's decision to default on a loan, such as property, cash flow, occupancy, maintenance needs and other financing obligations. If loan defaults increase, our risk-sharing obligation payments under the Fannie Mae DUS program may increase and such defaults and payments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity. In addition, any failure to pay our share of losses under the Fannie Mae DUS program could result in the revocation of our license from Fannie Mae and in the exercise of various remedies available to Fannie Mae under the Fannie Mae DUS program, including the transfer of our servicing portfolio to another Fannie Mae approved servicer.

If we fail to act proactively with delinquent borrowers in an effort to avoid a default, the number of delinquent loans could increase, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

As a loan servicer for GSEs and HUD, we are the primary contact with the borrower throughout the life of the loan and we are responsible, pursuant to agreements with the GSEs, HUD and institutional investors, for asset management. We are also responsible, together with the applicable GSE, HUD, or institutional investor, for taking actions to mitigate losses. We believe we have developed an effective asset management process for tracking each loan we service. However, we may be unsuccessful in identifying loans that are in danger of underperforming or defaulting or in taking appropriate action once those loans are identified. While we can make recommendations, decisions regarding loss mitigation are within the control of the GSEs, HUD and institutional investors. When loans become delinquent, we may incur additional expenses in servicing and asset managing the loans and we are required to advance principal and interest payments and tax and insurance escrow amounts. Our Agency Business could also be subject to a loss of its contractual servicing fee, and it could suffer losses of up to 20% (or more for loans that do not meet specific underwriting criteria or default within 12 months) of the UPB of a Fannie Mae DUS loan with full risk-sharing. These items could have a negative impact on our cash flows and a negative effect on the net carrying value of the MSRs on our

balance sheet and could result in a charge to our earnings. As a result of the foregoing, a rise in delinquencies could have a material adverse effect on our Agency Business.

A reduction in the prices paid for the loans and services of our Agency Business or an increase in loan or security interest rates by investors could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.

The Agency Business's results of operations and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected if the GSEs, HUD or institutional investors lower the price they are willing to pay for loans or services or adversely change the material terms of their loan purchases or servicing arrangements with us. A number of factors determine the price we receive for our agency loans. With respect to Fannie Mae related originations, loans are generally sold as Fannie Mae insured securities to third-party investors. For HUD related originations, loans are generally sold as Ginnie Mae securities to third-party investors. In both cases, the price paid to us reflects, in part, the competitive market bidding process for these securities.

Our Agency Business sells loans directly to Freddie Mac. Freddie Mac may choose to hold, sell or later securitize such loans. We believe terms set by Freddie Mac are influenced by similar market factors as those that impact the price of Fannie Mae insured or Ginnie Mae securities, although the pricing process differs. With respect to loans that are placed with institutional investors, the origination fees that we receive from borrowers are determined through negotiations, competition and other market conditions.

Loan servicing fees are based, in part, on the risk-sharing obligations associated with the loan and the market pricing of credit risk. The credit risk premium offered by Fannie Mae for new loans can change periodically but remains fixed once we enter into a commitment to sell the loan. Over the past several years, Fannie Mae loan servicing fees have been higher due to the market pricing of credit risk. There can be no assurance that such fees will continue to remain at such levels or that such levels will be sufficient if delinquencies occur.

A significant portion of our Agency Business's revenue is derived from loan servicing fees, and declines in, or terminations of, servicing engagements or breaches of servicing agreements, including as a result of non-performance by third parties that we engage for back-office loan servicing functions, could have a material adverse effect on us.

We expect that loan servicing fees will constitute a significant portion of our Agency Business's revenues for the foreseeable future. Nearly all of these fees are derived from loans that have been originated and sold through GSE and HUD programs. A decline in the number or value of loans that the Agency Business originates for these investors or terminations of its servicing engagements will decrease these fees. HUD has the right to terminate our current servicing engagements for cause. In addition to termination for cause, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may terminate our servicing engagements without cause by paying a termination fee. The Agency Business is also subject to losses that may arise as a result of servicing errors, such as a failure to maintain insurance, pay taxes or provide required notices. In addition, we have contracted with a third party to perform certain routine back-office aspects of loan servicing. If we, or this third party, fail to perform, or we breach, or the third-party causes a breach, of our servicing obligations to the GSEs or HUD, our servicing engagements may be terminated. Declines or terminations of servicing engagements or breaches of such obligations could materially and adversely affect our financial results.

We satisfy all of our restricted liquidity requirements with Fannie Mae with a letter of credit issued by one of our lenders. If the letter of credit became unavailable to us for any reason, we could suffer a significant reduction in our cash flow from operations, or we may breach our obligations to Fannie Mae, which would have a material adverse effect on our Agency Business.

Our Agency Business is required to pledge restricted cash as collateral for possible losses resulting from loans originated under the Fannie Mae DUS program in accordance with the terms of loss sharing agreements with Fannie Mae. As of December 31, 2017, this requirement totaled $41.8 million and was fully satisfied with a $42.0 million letter of credit issued to Fannie Mae by one of our lenders. We have an additional $3.0 million available under this letter of credit and then will be required to post cash for any future increases in this collateral requirement. Our letter of credit facility expires in September 2020. The facility is collateralized by the servicing cash flow generated from the Agency Business's Fannie Mae portfolio and contains certain financial and other covenants. If we fail to satisfy any of these covenants, or we are unable to renew or replace this facility on favorable terms, or at all, it could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and our financial condition. If we were unable to replace the letter of credit facility with either a similar facility or cash, we would be in breach of our obligations to Fannie Mae, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

The Agency Business is subject to the risk of failed loan deliveries, and even after a successful closing and delivery, may be required to repurchase the loan or to indemnify the investor if there is a breach of a representation or warranty made by the Agency Business in connection with the sale of the loan through a GSE or HUD program, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our Agency Business bears the risk that a borrower will choose not to close on a loan that has been pre-sold to an investor or that the investor will choose not to purchase a loan under certain circumstances, including, for example, a significant casualty event that impacts the condition of a property after we fund the loan and prior to the investor purchase date. We also bear the risk of serious errors in loan documentation that prevent timely delivery of the loan prior to the investor purchase date. A complete failure to deliver a loan could be a default under the warehouse line used to finance the loan. Although the Agency Business has experienced only three failed loan deliveries in its history, none of which had a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations, we can provide no assurance that we will not experience additional failed deliveries in the future or that any losses will not be material or will be mitigated through property insurance or payment protections.

We must make certain representations and warranties concerning each loan we originate for GSE or HUD programs. The representations and warranties relate to our practices in the origination and servicing of the loans and the accuracy of the information being provided by us. For example, we are generally required to provide the following, among other, representations and warranties: we are authorized to do business and to sell or assign the loan; the loan conforms to the requirements of the GSE or HUD and certain laws and regulations; the underlying mortgage represents a valid first lien on the property and there are no other liens on the property; the loan documents are valid and enforceable; taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, rents and similar other payments have been paid or escrowed; the property is insured, conforms to zoning laws and remains intact; and we do not know of any issues regarding the loan that are reasonably expected to cause the loan to be delinquent or unacceptable for investment or adversely affect its value. We are permitted to satisfy certain of these representations and warranties by furnishing a title insurance policy.

In the event of a breach of any representation or warranty, investors could, among other things, require us to repurchase the full amount of the loan and seek indemnification for losses from it or, in the case of Fannie Mae, increase the level of risk-sharing on the loan. Our obligation to repurchase the loan is independent of our risk-sharing obligations. The GSEs or HUD could require us to repurchase a loan if representations and warranties are breached, even if the loan is not in default. Because the accuracy of many such representations and warranties generally is based on our actions or on third-

party reports, such as title reports and environmental reports, we may not receive similar representations and warranties from other parties that would serve as a claim against them. Even if we receive representations and warranties from third parties and have a claim against them in the event of a breach, our ability to recover on any such claim may be limited. Our ability to recover against a borrower that breaches its representations and warranties to us may be similarly limited. Our ability to recover on a claim against any party would also be dependent, in part, upon the financial condition and liquidity of such party. Although we believe that we have capable personnel at all levels, use qualified third parties and have established controls to ensure that all loans are originated pursuant to requirements established by the GSEs and HUD, in addition to our own internal requirements, there can be no assurance that we, our employees or third parties will not make mistakes. Any significant repurchase or indemnification obligations imposed on us could have a material adverse effect on the Agency Business.

For most loans we service under the Fannie Mae and HUD programs, we are required to advance payments due to investors if the borrower is delinquent in making such payments, which requirement could adversely impact our liquidity and harm our results of operations.

For most loans we service under the Fannie Mae DUS program, we are required to advance the principal and interest payments and tax and insurance escrow amounts if the borrower is delinquent in making loan payments. After four continuous months of making advances on behalf of the borrower, we can submit a reimbursement claim to Fannie Mae, which Fannie Mae may approve at its discretion. We are reimbursed by Fannie Mae for these advances in the event the loan is brought current. In the event of a default, any advances made by the Agency Business are used to reduce the proceeds required to settle any loss share. Our advances may also be reimbursed, to the extent that the default settlement proceeds on the collateral exceed the UPB.

Under the HUD program, we are obligated to advance tax and insurance escrow amounts and principal and interest payments on the underlying loan until the Ginnie Mae security has been fully paid. In the event of a default on a HUD insured loan, we can elect to assign the loan to HUD and file a mortgage insurance claim. HUD will reimburse approximately 99% of any losses of principal and interest on the loan and Ginnie Mae will reimburse most of the remaining losses of principal and interest.

Although the Agency Business has historically funded all required advances from operating cash flow, there can be no assurance we will be able to do so in the future. If the Agency Business does not have sufficient operating cash flows to fund such advances, we may need to finance such amounts. Such financing may not be available to us, or, if it is available, may be costly and could prevent the Agency Business from pursuing its business and growth strategies.

Our Agency Business may not be able to hire and retain qualified loan originators or grow and maintain its relationships with key customers, and if we are unable to do so, our ability to implement our business and growth strategies could be limited.

The Agency Business depends on its loan originators to generate borrower clients by, among other things, developing relationships with commercial property owners, real estate agents and brokers, developers and others, which leads to repeat and referral business. Accordingly, we must be able to attract, motivate and retain skilled loan originators. The market for loan originators is highly competitive and may lead to increased costs to hire and retain them. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to attract or retain qualified loan originators. If we cannot attract, motivate or retain a sufficient number of skilled loan originators, or even if we can motivate or retain them but at higher costs, we could be materially and adversely affected.

If our Agency Business fails to comply with the numerous government regulations and program requirements of the GSEs and HUD, we may lose our approved lender status with these entities and fail to gain additional approvals or licenses for our business. We are also subject to changes in laws, regulations and existing GSE and HUD program requirements, including potential increases in reserve and risk retention requirements that could increase our costs and affect the way we conduct the Agency Business, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results.

The Agency Business's operations are subject to regulation by federal, state and local government authorities, various laws and judicial and administrative decisions, and regulations and policies of the GSEs and HUD. These laws, regulations, rules and policies impose, among other things, minimum net worth, operational liquidity and collateral requirements. Fannie Mae requires the Agency Business to maintain operational liquidity based on a formula that considers the balance of the loan and the level of credit loss exposure (level of risk-sharing). Fannie Mae requires its DUS lenders to maintain collateral, which may include pledged securities, for their risk-sharing obligations. The amount of collateral required under the Fannie Mae DUS program is calculated at the loan level and is based on the balance of the loan, the level of risk-sharing, the seasoning of the loans and the rating of the Fannie Mae DUS lender.

Regulatory authorities also require the Agency Business to submit financial reports and to maintain a quality control plan for the underwriting, origination and servicing of loans. Numerous laws and regulations also impose qualification and licensing obligations on the Agency Business and impose requirements and restrictions affecting, among other things: the Agency Business's loan originations; maximum interest rates, finance charges and other fees that we may charge; disclosures to consumers; the terms of secured transactions; collection, repossession and claims handling procedures; personnel qualifications; and other trade practices. The Agency Business is also subject to inspection by the GSEs, HUD, and regulatory authorities. Any failure to comply with these requirements could lead to, among other things, the loss of a license as an approved GSE or HUD lender, the inability to gain additional approvals or licenses, the termination of contractual rights without compensation, demands for indemnification or loan repurchases, class action lawsuits and administrative enforcement actions.

Regulatory and legal requirements are subject to change. For example, Fannie Mae increased its collateral requirements, on loans classified by Fannie Mae as Tier II, from 60 basis points to 75 basis points in 2013, which applied to a large portion of the Agency Business's outstanding Fannie Mae at risk portfolio. The incremental requirement for any newly originated Fannie Mae Tier II loans will be funded over the 48 months subsequent to the sale of the loan to Fannie Mae. Fannie Mae has indicated that it may increase collateral requirements in the future, which may adversely impact our Agency Business.

If we fail to comply with laws, regulations and market standards regarding the privacy, use, and security of customer information, or if we are the target of a successful cyber-attack, we may be subject to legal and regulatory actions and our reputation would be harmed.

We receive, maintain, and store the non-public personal information of our loan applicants. The technology and other controls and processes designed to secure our customer information and to prevent, detect, and remedy any unauthorized access to that information were designed to obtain reasonable, not absolute, assurance that such information is secure and that any unauthorized access is identified and addressed appropriately. We are not aware of any data breaches, successful hacker attacks, unauthorized access and misuse, or significant computer viruses affecting our networks that may have occurred in the past; however, our controls may not have detected, and may in the future fail to prevent or detect, unauthorized access to our borrower information. If this information is inappropriately accessed and used by a third party or an employee for illegal purposes, such as identity

theft, we may be responsible to the affected applicant or borrower for any losses that may have been incurred as a result of misappropriation. In such an instance, we may be liable to a governmental authority for fines or penalties associated with a lapse in the integrity and security of our customers' information.

Our chairman, chief executive officer and president and the chief executive officer of ACM, beneficially owns approximately 70% of the outstanding membership interests of ACM. ACM has approximately 25% of the voting power of our outstanding stock as of December 31, 2017. As a result of our chief executive officer's beneficial ownership of stock held by ACM, as well as his beneficial ownership of additional shares of our common stock, our chief executive officer has approximately 31% of the voting power of our outstanding stock as of December 31, 2017. Because of his positions with us and ACM, and his ability to effectively vote a substantial minority of our outstanding stock, our chief executive officer has significant influence over our policies and strategy.

Our charter generally does not permit ownership in excess of 5% of our capital stock, and attempts to acquire our capital stock in excess of this limit are ineffective without prior approval from our Board of Directors.

For the purpose of preserving our REIT qualification, our charter generally prohibits a beneficial or constructive ownership by any person of more than 5% (by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of our common stock or 5% (by value) of our outstanding shares of stock of all classes or series (excluding OP Units), unless an exemption is granted by the Board of Directors. Our charter's constructive ownership rules are complex and may cause the outstanding stock owned by a group of related individuals or entities to be deemed to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. As a result, the acquisition of less than these percentages of the outstanding stock by an individual or entity could cause that individual or entity to own constructively in excess of these percentages of the outstanding stock and thus be subject to our charter's ownership limit. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our common or preferred stock in excess of the ownership limit without the consent of the Board of Directors will result in the shares being automatically transferred to a charitable trust or otherwise voided. Our Board of Directors have approved resolutions under our charter allowing our chief executive officer and ACM, in relation to our chief executive officer's controlling equity interest, a former director, as well as three outside investors, to own more than the ownership interest limit of our common stock stated in our charter.

Our staggered board and other provisions of our charter and bylaws may prevent a change in our control.

Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors. The current terms of the Class I, Class II and Class III directors will expire in 2019, 2020 and 2018, respectively. Directors of each class are chosen for three year terms upon the expiration of their current terms, and each year one class of directors is elected by the stockholders. The staggered terms of our directors may reduce the possibility of a tender offer or an attempt at a change in control, even though a tender offer or change in control might be in the best interest of our stockholders. In addition, our charter and bylaws also contain other provisions that may delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

If we fail to remain qualified as a REIT, we will be subject to tax as a regular corporation and could face a substantial tax liability.

We conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. However, qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Our continued qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. In addition, our ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT depends in part on the actions of third parties over which we have no control or only limited influence, including in cases where we own an equity interest in an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, then:

Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.

Even if we remain qualified for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes, such as mortgage recording taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distribution to our stockholders. In addition, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, or to avert the imposition of a 100% tax that applies to certain gains derived by a REIT from dealer property or inventory, we may hold some of our assets through taxable subsidiary corporations, the income of which would be subject to federal and state income tax.

As REITs, we and Arbor Realty SR, Inc. generally are unable to directly hold certain assets and operations in connection with the Agency Business. As a result, we are holding those assets and operations through our taxable REIT subsidiaries (each, a TRS) of Arbor Realty SR, Inc., which is subject to regular corporate income tax. Moreover, under the REIT asset tests (i) no more than 25% of our total gross assets may consist of non-qualifying assets, including the stock or other securities of one or more TRSs and other non-qualifying assets (such as goodwill and similar assets acquired as a result of the acquisition of our Agency Business), and (ii) for 2018 and subsequent taxable years, no more than 20% of our total gross assets may consist of the stock or other securities of one or more TRSs. In addition, although dividends payable by TRSs constitute qualifying income for purposes of the 95% REIT gross income test, they are non-qualifying income for purposes of the 75% REIT gross income test. Accordingly, if the value of our Agency Business or the income generated thereby

increases relative to the value of our other, REIT-compliant assets and income, we or Arbor Realty SR, Inc. may fail to satisfy one or more of the requirements applicable to REITs. Although the Agency Business is not expected to adversely affect our ability, or that of Arbor Realty SR, Inc., to continue to qualify as a REIT in the future, no assurances can be given in that regard.

The "taxable mortgage pool" rules may increase the taxes that we or our stockholders may incur, and may limit the manner in which we effect future securitizations.

Certain of our securitizations have resulted in the creation of taxable mortgage pools for federal income tax purposes. So long as 100% of the equity interests in a taxable mortgage pool are owned by an entity that qualifies as a REIT, including our subsidiary Arbor Realty SR, Inc., we would generally not be adversely affected by the characterization of the securitization as a taxable mortgage pool. Certain categories of stockholders, however, such as foreign stockholders eligible for treaty or other tax benefits, stockholders with net operating losses, and certain tax-exempt stockholders that are subject to unrelated business income tax, could be subject to increased taxes on a portion of their dividend income from us that is attributable to the taxable mortgage pool. In addition, to the extent that our stock is owned by tax-exempt "disqualified organizations," such as certain government-related entities that are not subject to tax on unrelated business income, we could incur a corporate level tax on a portion of our income from the taxable mortgage pool. In that case, we may reduce the amount of our distributions to any disqualified organization whose stock ownership gave rise to the tax. Moreover, we could be precluded from selling equity interests in these securitizations to outside investors, or selling any debt securities issued in connection with these securitizations that might be considered to be equity interests for tax purposes. These limitations may prevent us from using certain techniques to maximize our returns from securitization transactions.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

Complying with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify as a REIT we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities generally cannot comprise more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities, or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities, of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than assets which qualify for purposes of the 75% asset test) may consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 25% of the value of our total assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we must correct such failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate investments to satisfy our obligations to future lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our status as a REIT.

We may be unable to generate sufficient revenue from operations to pay our operating expenses and to pay dividends to our stockholders.

As a REIT, we are generally required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income each year to our stockholders. In order to qualify for the tax benefits afforded to REITs, we intend to declare quarterly dividends and to make distributions to our stockholders in amounts such that we distribute all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income each year, subject to certain adjustments. However, our ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by the risk factors described in this report. In the event of a future downturn in our operating results and financial performance or unanticipated declines in the value of our asset portfolio, we may be unable to declare or pay quarterly dividends. The timing and amount of dividends are in the sole discretion of our Board of Directors, which considers, among other factors, our earnings, financial condition, debt service obligations and applicable debt covenants, REIT qualification requirements and other tax considerations and capital expenditure requirements as our board may deem relevant.

Among the factors that could adversely affect our results of operations and impair our ability to make distributions to our stockholders are:

A change in any one of these factors could affect our ability to make distributions. If we are not able to comply with the restrictive covenants and financial ratios contained in future credit facilities, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may also be impaired. We cannot assure that we will be able to make distributions to our stockholders in the future or that the level of any distributions we make will increase over time.

We may need to borrow funds to satisfy our REIT distribution requirements, and a portion of our distributions may constitute a return of capital. Debt service on any borrowings for this purpose will reduce our cash available for distribution.

To qualify as a REIT, we must generally, among other requirements, distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, to our stockholders each year. To the extent that we satisfy the distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under federal tax laws.

From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our net income for financial reporting purposes, or our taxable income may be greater than our cash flow available for distribution to our stockholders. If we do not have other funds available in these situations we could be required to borrow funds, issue stock or sell investments at disadvantageous prices or find another alternative source of funds to make distributions sufficient to enable us to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year.

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could reduce the market price of our common stock.

The present U.S. federal income tax treatment of REITs and their shareholders may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time, which could affect the U.S. federal income tax treatment of an investment in our shares. The U.S. federal income tax rules, including those dealing with REITs, are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department, which results in statutory changes as well as frequent revisions to regulations and interpretations.

The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Reform") makes substantial changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Among those changes for corporations, beginning in 2018, the corporate federal tax rate (which impacts our TRS) has been permanently reduced from 35% to 21%; various currently allowed deductions have been eliminated or modified, including substantial limitations on the deductibility of interest; and the deductions of net operating losses are subject to certain additional limitations. Changes that impact individuals and non-corporate taxpayers (which generally reduce their taxes on a temporary basis subject to "sunset" provisions) include a reduction in the top marginal rate to 37%; capital gain income (including capital gain dividends that we pay) remains subject to tax at 20%; and dividends paid by a REIT (including dividends that we pay that are not capital gain dividends) are eligible for a 20% deduction off of the applicable marginal rate. Therefore, the top marginal rate on such dividends is 29.6% (80% of the top marginal rate of 37%).

A portion of our dividends (including dividends received from our TRS) may be eligible for preferential rates as "qualified dividend income," which has a top individual tax rate of 20% to U.S. stockholders. In addition, certain U.S. stockholders who are individuals, trusts or estates, and whose income exceeds certain thresholds, are required to pay a 3.8% medicare tax on our dividends and gain from the sale of our stock.

The effect of the changes made in the Tax Reform is highly uncertain, both in terms of their direct effect on the taxation of an investment in our common stock and their indirect effect on the value of our assets or common stock or market conditions generally. Furthermore, many of the provisions of the Tax Reform will require guidance through the issuance of treasury regulations in order to assess their effect. There may be a substantial delay before such regulations are promulgated, increasing the uncertainty as to the ultimate effect of the statutory amendments on us. It is also likely that there will be technical corrections legislation proposed with respect to the Tax Reform next year, the effect of which cannot be predicted and may be adverse to us or our stockholders.

Restrictions on share accumulation in REITs could discourage a change of control of us.

In order for us to qualify as a REIT, not more than 50% of the value of our outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals during the last half of a taxable year.

To prevent five or fewer individuals from acquiring more than 50% of our outstanding shares and a resulting failure to qualify as a REIT, our charter provides that, subject to certain exceptions, no person, including entities, may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of the attribution provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, more than 5% of the aggregate value or number of shares (whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding common stock, or more than 5%, by value, of our outstanding shares of stock of all classes or series, in the aggregate.

Shares of our stock that would otherwise be directly or indirectly acquired or held by a person in violation of the ownership limitations are, in general, automatically transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary, and the purported owner's interest in such shares is void. In addition, any person who acquires shares in excess of these limits is obliged to immediately give written notice to us

and provide us with any information we may request in order to determine the effect of the acquisition on our status as a REIT.

While these restrictions are designed to prevent any five individuals from owning more than 50% of our shares, they could also discourage a change in control of our company. These restrictions may also deter tender offers that may be attractive to stockholders or limit the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their shares if an investor makes purchases of shares to acquire a block of shares.

Our principle corporate offices are located in leased space at 333 Earle Ovington Boulevard, Uniondale, New York, 11553.

We are not involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us, other than the litigation described in Note 16—Commitments and Contingencies—Litigation of this report. We have not made a loss accrual for this litigation because we believe that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred and an amount cannot be reasonably estimated. Additionally, see Note 9—Investments in Equity Affiliates for information surrounding a litigation settlement involving an indirect interest in one of our equity investments.

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "ABR." On February 9, 2018, there were 15,711 record holders of our common stock, including persons holding shares in broker accounts under street names. The closing sale price for our common stock, as reported on the NYSE on February 16, 2018, was $8.43. The following table shows the intra-day high and low sales prices per share as reported on the NYSE and dividends declared and paid for the past two years.

We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT, which requires that we distribute at least 90% of taxable income. No assurance, however, can be given as to the amounts or timing of future distributions as such distributions are subject to our taxable earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant.

The following table presents information as of December 31, 2017 regarding the 2017 Amended Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, as amemded and restated (the "2017 Plan"), which is our only equity compensation plans.

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return for our common stock with the Russell 2000 Index, the NAREIT All REITs Index and the FTSE NAREIT Mortgage REITs Index for the five year period from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2017. The graph assumes a $100 investment on January 1, 2013 and the reinvestment of any dividends. This graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. The information included in the graph and table below was obtained from S&P Global Market Intelligence.

In accordance with SEC rules, this section entitled "Performance Graph" shall not be incorporated by reference into any of our future filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, and shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

The following selected historical consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this report. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation ($ in thousands, except per share data).

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the sections of this report entitled "Forward-Looking Statements," "Risk Factors" and "Selected Financial Data," along with the historical consolidated financial statements including related notes, included in this report.

Through our Structured Business, we invest in a diversified portfolio of structured finance assets in the multifamily and commercial real estate markets, primarily consisting of bridge and mezzanine loans, including junior participating interests in first mortgages, preferred and direct equity. Through our Agency Business, we originate, sell and service a range of multifamily finance products through GSE, HUD and CMBS programs. We retain the servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on substantially all loans we originate and sell under the GSE and HUD programs. We were previously externally managed and advised by ACM and, on May 31, 2017, we exercised our option to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement. See Note 1—Description of Business for details about our business segments and Note 3—Acquisition of Our Former Manager's Agency Platform for details about the Acquisition and termination of the management agreement. We conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT. A REIT is generally not subject to federal income tax on its REIT-taxable income that is distributed to its stockholders, provided that at least 90% of its REIT-taxable income is distributed and provided that certain other requirements are met.

Net interest income earned on our investments. Net interest income represents the amount by which the interest income earned on our assets exceeds the interest expense incurred on our borrowings. If the yield on our assets increases or the cost or borrowings decreases, this will have a positive impact on earnings. However, if the yield earned on our assets decreases or the cost of borrowings increases, this will have a negative impact on earnings. Net interest income is also directly impacted by the size and performance of our asset portfolio. We recognize the bulk of our net interest income from our Structured Business. Additionally, we recognize net interest income from loans originated through our Agency Business, which are generally sold within 60 days of origination.

Fees and other revenue recognized from originating, selling and servicing mortgage loans through the GSE and HUD programs. Revenue recognized from the origination and sale of mortgage loans consists of gains on sale of loans (net of any direct loan origination costs incurred), commitment fees, broker fees, loan assumption fees and loan origination fees. These gains and fees are collectively referred to as gain on sales, including fee-based services, net. We record income from MSRs at the time of commitment to the borrower, which represents the fair value of the expected net future cash flows associated with the rights to service mortgage loans that we originate, with the recognition of a corresponding asset upon sale. We also record servicing revenue which consists of fees received for servicing mortgage loans, net of amortization on the MSR assets recorded. These origination, selling and servicing fees and other revenue began in the third quarter of 2016 as a result of the Acquisition and are included in our Agency Business results. Although we have long-established relationships with the GSE and HUD agencies, our operating performance would be negatively impacted if our business relationships with these agencies deteriorate.

Income earned from our structured transactions. Our structured transactions are primarily comprised of investments in equity affiliates, which represent unconsolidated joint venture investments formed to acquire, develop and/or sell real estate-related assets. If interest rates continue to rise, it is likely that income from these investments will continue to be significantly impacted. In addition, we periodically receive distributions from our equity investments. It is difficult to forecast the timing of

such payments, which can be substantial in any given quarter. We account for structured transactions within our Structured Business.

Credit quality of our loans and investments, including our servicing portfolio. Effective portfolio management is essential to maximize the performance and value of our loan and investment and servicing portfolios. Maintaining the credit quality of the loans in our portfolios is of critical importance. Loans that do not perform in accordance with their terms may have a negative impact on earnings and liquidity.

Internalization of Management Team. We exercised our option to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement with ACM for $25.0 million. See Note 3—Acquisition of Our Former Manager's Agency Platform for details.

Dividend. We raised our quarterly common dividend to $0.21 per share in the first quarter of 2018, a 24% increase over the quarterly common dividend paid in the prior year comparable quarter of $0.17 per share.

Our ability to execute our business strategy, particularly the growth of our Structured Business portfolio of loans and investments, depends on many factors, including our ability to access capital and financing on favorable terms. The past economic downturn had a significant negative impact on both us and our borrowers and limited our ability for growth. If similar economic conditions recur in the future, it may limit our options for raising capital and obtaining financing on favorable terms and may also adversely impact the creditworthiness of our borrowers which could result in their inability to repay their loans.

We rely on the capital markets to generate capital for financing the growth of our business. While we have been successful in generating capital through the debt and equity markets throughout 2017, there can be no assurance that we will continue to have access to such markets. If we were to experience a prolonged downturn in the stock or credit markets, it could cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our business plan accordingly.

The Federal Reserve increased its targeted Federal Rate three times in 2017 for an aggregate increase of 75 basis points. To date, we have not been significantly impacted by these increases and do not anticipate a significant decline in origination volume or profitability as interest rates remain at historically low levels. We expect the current interest rate environment to continue for the near term as the Federal Reserve has stated that it will take a measured and conservative approach to future interest rate decisions.

The Trump administration continues to focus on several issues that could impact interest rates and the U.S. economy, including the recently enacted Tax Reform. As a result of the Tax Reform, we expect to realize a benefit from the reduction of the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, as our Agency Buisiness operates in a TRS. While there is uncertainty regarding the specifics and timing of any future policy changes, any such actions could impact our business.

We are a national originator with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the GSEs remain the most significant providers of capital to the multifamily market. The Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA") released the GSE 2018 Scorecard ("2018 Scorecard,") which established Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's loan origination caps at $35.0 billion ("2018 Caps") each for the multifamily finance market, a $1.5 billion decrease from the 2017 loan origination caps. Affordable housing loans, loans to small multifamily properties, and manufactured housing rental community loans continue to be excluded from the 2018 Caps. In addition, the definition of the affordable loan exclusions has added an extremely-high cost market category, continues to encompass affordable housing in high- and very-high cost markets and allows for an exclusion from the 2018 Caps for the pro-rata portion of any loan on a multifamily property that includes affordable units. The 2018 Scorecard continues to provide FHFA the

flexibility to review the estimated size of the multifamily loan origination market quarterly and proactively adjust the 2018 Caps accordingly. The 2018 Scorecard also continues to provide exclusions for loans to properties in underserved markets and for loans to finance certain energy or water efficiency improvements, however, to qualify for this exclusion, the projected annual energy or water savings must be at least 25%. Our originations with the GSEs are highly profitable executions as they provide significant gains from the sale of our loans, non-cash gains related to MSRs and servicing revenues, therefore, a decline in our GSE originations would negatively impact our financial results. We are unsure whether the FHFA will impose stricter limitations on GSE multifamily production volume in the future.

The commercial real estate markets continue to improve, but uncertainty remains as a result of global market instability, the current political climate and other matters and their potential impact on the U.S. economy and commercial real estate markets. In addition, the growth in multifamily rental rates seen over the past few years are showing signs of stabilizing. If real estate values decline and/or rent growth subsides, it may limit our new mortgage loan originations since borrowers often use increases in the value of, and revenues produced from, their existing properties to support the purchase or investment in additional properties. Declining real estate values may also significantly increase the likelihood that we will incur losses on our loans in the event of default because the value of our collateral may be insufficient to cover our cost on the loan. Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could adversely affect both our net interest income from loans as well as our ability to originate, sell and securitize loans, which would significantly impact our results of operations, financial condition, business prospects and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The economic environment over the past few years has experienced continued improvement in commercial real estate values, which has generally increased payoffs and reduced the credit exposure in our loan and investment portfolio. We have made, and continue to make, modifications and extensions to loans when it is economically feasible to do so. In some cases, a modification is a more viable alternative to foreclosure proceedings when a borrower cannot comply with loan terms. In doing so, lower borrower interest rates, combined with non-performing loans, would lower our net interest margins when comparing interest income to our costs of financing. However, since 2013, the levels of modifications and delinquencies have declined as property values have increased and borrowers' access to financing has improved. If the markets were to deteriorate and the U.S. experienced a prolonged economic downturn, we believe there could be additional loan modifications and delinquencies, which may result in reduced net interest margins and additional losses throughout our sector.

Assets—Comparison of balances at December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2016:

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $34.3 million, primarily due to an increase in restricted cash from proceeds available to fund additional loans in CLO IX which closed in late December 2017, the payment of distributions to our stockholders, funding of structured loans and investments growth (net of new debt financings) and the payment made to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement with our Former Manager, partially offset by cash from operations of the business and proceeds from the public offering of our common stock.

Restricted cash increased $110.1 million, primarily due to proceeds available in CLO IX for the purpose of funding additional loans subsequent to the closing date in late December 2017. Restricted cash is kept on deposit with the trustees for our CLOs and primarily represents proceeds available for redeployment into new assets or disbursement to bondholders primarily from loan payoffs and paydowns, as well as unfunded loan commitments and interest payments received from loans. Restricted cash for the Agency Business represents cash collateral for possible losses resulting from

loans originated under the Fannie Mae DUS program in accordance with the terms of the loss-sharing agreements.

Our Structured loan and investment portfolio balance was $2.66 billion and $1.80 billion at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. This increase was primarily due to loan originations exceeding payoffs and other reductions by $918.9 million. See below for details.

Our portfolio had a weighted average current interest pay rate of 6.28% and 5.71% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Including certain fees earned and costs associated with the Structured portfolio, the weighted average current interest rate was 6.99% and 6.39% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Advances on our financing facilities totaled $2.24 billion and $1.35 billion at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with a weighted average funding cost of 4.12% and 3.91%, respectively, which excludes financing costs. Including the financing costs, the weighted average funding rate was 4.83% and 4.45% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Activity from our Structured Business portfolio was comprised of the following ($ in thousands):

Our loans held-for-sale from the Agency Business decreased $375.9 million, primarily related to loan sales exceeding loan originations by $352.5 million during 2017 as noted in the following table (in thousands). These loans are generally sold within 60 days from the loan origination date.

Our capitalized mortgage servicing rights increased $24.9 million at December 31, 2017, primarily due to MSRs recorded on new loan originations, partially offset by amortization and write-offs. Our capitalized mortgage servicing rights represent the estimated value of our rights to service mortgage loans for others. At December 31, 2017, the weighted average estimated life remaining of our MSRs was 7.2 years.

Securities held-to-maturity totaling $27.8 million represents the retained portions of the bottom tranche bonds, or "B Piece" of Freddie Mac SBL program securitizations. See Note 8—Securities Held-to-Maturity for details.

Goodwill and other intangible assets increased $24.3 million, primarily due to $25.0 million of goodwill recorded in connection with the internalization of our management team and termination of

our existing management agreement with our Former Manager. See Note 3—Acquisition of Our Former Manager's Agency Platform for details.

Liabilities—Comparison of balances at December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2016:

Credit facilities and repurchase agreements decreased $378.1 million, primarily due to a $368.6 million decrease in financings on our loans held-for-sale, as a result of loan sales exceeding loan originations during 2017.

Collateralized loan obligations increased $690.0 million due to the issuances of three new CLOs, where we issued a total of $918.3 million of notes to third party investors, partially offset by the unwind of a CLO totaling $219.0 million.

We formed a Debt Fund where we issued an aggregate of $70.0 million of floating rate notes to third party investors. See Note 12—Debt Obligations for details.

Convertible senior unsecured notes increased $150.6 million, primarily due to the issuance of $143.8 million of 5.375% convertible senior unsecured notes and an additional $13.8 million of the 6.50% convertible senior unsecured notes. See Note 12—Debt Obligations for details.

Junior subordinated notes decreased $18.3 million, primarily due to the repurchase of certain of our junior subordinated notes with a carrying value of $19.8 million. We recorded a gain of $7.1 million upon extinguishment of this debt in the first quarter of 2017.

In May 2017, we completed a public offering where we sold 9,500,000 shares of our common stock for $8.05 per share, and received net proceeds of $76.2 million. We used $25.0 million of the proceeds to exercise our option to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement with our Former Manager. The remaining amount was used to make investments and for general corporate purposes. We currently have $179.8 million available under our $500.0 million shelf registration statement.

The following table presents dividends declared (on a per share basis) for 2017:

Common Stock—On February 21, 2018, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.21 per share of common stock. The dividend is payable on March 21, 2018 to common stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 8, 2018.

Preferred Stock—On February 2, 2018, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.515625 per share of 8.25% Series A preferred stock; a cash dividend of $0.484375 per share of 7.75% Series B preferred stock; and a cash dividend of $0.53125 per share of 8.50% Series C preferred stock. These amounts reflect dividends from December 1, 2017 through February 28, 2018 and are payable on February 28, 2018 to preferred stockholders of record on February 15, 2018.

In 2017, we issued 395,339 shares of restricted stock to employees of ours and our Former Manager, including our chief executive officer, 74,375 shares to the independent members of the Board of Directors and up to 448,980 performance-based restricted common stock units to our chief executive officer. We also granted our chief executive officer 357,569 shares of performance-based restricted stock as a result of meeting the goals related to the integration of the Acquisition. See Note 18—Equity for details.

The following table provides our consolidated operating results ($ in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,						Increase / (Decrease)

	2017			2016			Amount			Percent
Interest income	$	156,177		$	116,173		$	40,004			34	%
Other interest income, net		—			2,539			(2,539	)		(100	)%
Interest expense		90,072			63,623			26,449			42	%

Net interest income		66,105			55,089			11,016			20	%

Other revenue:
Gain on sales, including fee-based services, net		72,799			24,594			48,205			196	%
Mortgage servicing rights		76,820			44,941			31,879			71	%
Servicing revenue, net		29,210			9,054			20,156			nm
Property operating income		10,973			14,881			(3,908	)		(26	)%
Other income, net		685			1,041			(356	)		(34	)%

Total other revenue		190,487			94,511			95,976			102	%

Other expenses:
Employee compensation and benefits		92,126			38,647			53,479			138	%
Selling and administrative		30,738			17,587			13,151			75	%
Acquisition costs		—			10,262			(10,262	)		(100	)%
Property operating expenses		10,482			13,501			(3,019	)		(22	)%
Depreciation and amortization		7,385			5,022			2,363			47	%
Impairment loss on real estate owned		3,200			11,200			(8,000	)		(71	)%
Provision for loss sharing (net of recoveries)		(259	)		2,235			(2,494	)		nm
Provision for loan losses (net of recoveries)		(456	)		(134	)		(322	)		nm
Management fee—related party		6,673			12,600			(5,927	)		(47	)%

Total other expenses		149,889			110,920			38,969			35	%

Income before gain on extinguishment of debt, gain on sale of real estate, (loss) income from equity affiliates and provision for income taxes		106,703			38,680			68,023			176	%
Gain on extinguishment of debt		7,116			—			7,116			100	%
Gain on sale of real estate		—			11,631			(11,631	)		(100	)%
(Loss) income from equity affiliates		(2,951	)		12,995			(15,946	)		nm
Provision for income taxes		(13,359	)		(825	)		(12,534	)		nm

Net income		97,509			62,481			35,028			56	%

Preferred stock dividends		7,554			7,554			—			—
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		24,120			12,131			11,989			99	%

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	65,835		$	42,796		$	23,039			54	%

The following table presents the average balance of our Structured Business interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, associated interest income (expense) and the corresponding weighted average yields ($ in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017							2016
	Average Carrying Value(1)		Interest Income / Expense		W/A Yield / Financing Cost(2)			Average Carrying Value(1)		Interest Income / Expense		W/A Yield / Financing Cost(2)
Structured Business interest-earning assets:
Bridge loans	$	1,775,793	$	118,396		6.67	%	$	1,510,811	$	95,211		6.28	%
Preferred equity investments		105,947		9,335		8.81	%		78,620		5,809		7.37	%
Mezzanine / junior participation loans		96,329		7,616		7.91	%		111,018		7,762		6.97	%

Core interest-earning assets		1,978,069		135,347		6.84	%		1,700,449		108,782		6.38	%
Cash equivalents		198,860		1,179		0.59	%		206,971		840		0.41	%

Total interest-earning assets	$	2,176,929		136,526		6.27	%	$	1,907,420		109,622		5.73	%



Structured Business interest-bearing liabilities:
CLO	$	983,807		39,442		4.01	%	$	846,324		30,239		3.56	%
Warehouse lines		223,856		9,531		4.26	%		181,169		6,427		3.54	%
Unsecured debt		214,634		18,018		8.39	%		117,983		9,718		8.21	%
Trust preferred		155,692		6,420		4.12	%		175,858		6,358		3.61	%
Debt Fund		8,978		530		5.90	%		—		—		—
Interest rate swaps		—		195		—			—		5,201		—

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,586,967		74,136		4.67	%	$	1,321,334		57,943		4.37	%



Net interest income			$	62,390						$	51,679

The increase in interest income is comprised of $26.9 million from our Structured Business and $13.1 million from our Agency Business. The $26.9 million, or 25%, increase from our Structured Business was primarily due to a 16% increase in our average core interest-earning assets, as a result of loan originations exceeding loan payoffs, and a 7% increase in the average yield on core interest-earning assets, largely due to increases in the average LIBOR rate and acceleration fees from early runoff. The increase in our Agency Business is due to the full period impact in 2017 of the Acquisition completed in the third quarter of 2016.

Other interest income, net was $2.5 million in 2016. During 2015, we acquired a $116.0 million defaulted first mortgage at par, which paid off during 2015. In 2016, additional funds held in escrow from the note payoff were released following an arbitration proceeding and we recognized net other interest income totaling $2.5 million.

The increase in interest expense is comprised of $16.2 million from our Structured Business, $8.2 million from our Agency Business and $2.1 million from the seller financing entered into in connection with the Acquisition. The $16.2 million, or 28%, increase from our Structured Business was primarily due to a 20% increase in the average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities and a 7% increase in the average cost of our interest-bearing liabilities. The increase in the average debt balance was due to growth in our loan portfolio, resulting in the issuance of our convertible senior unsecured notes, CLOs and a Debt Fund. The increase in the average cost of our interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to an increase in the average LIBOR rate, partially offset by the runoff of swaps in the first quarter of 2017. The increases from our Agency Business and seller financing are due to the full period impact in 2017 of the Acquisition.

The increase in gain on sales, including fee-based services was primarily due to a $3.32 billion increase in loan sales, as a result of the full period impact in 2017 of the Acquisition, as well as loans originated late in 2016 that sold in 2017, partially offset by a 14 basis point decrease in the sales margin (gain on sales, including fee-based services, net as a percentage of loan sales volume) from 1.65% to 1.51% in 2017, primarily due to an increase in larger Fannie Mae loans originated in 2017 which generally yield a lower sales margin.

The increase in income from MSRs was primarily due to a $2.21 billion increase in loan commitment volume, primarily a result of the full period impact in 2017 of the Acquisition. This increase was partially offset by a 34 basis point decrease in the MSR rate (income from MSRs as a percentage of loan commitment volume) from 2.11% to 1.77% in 2017, primarily due to an increase in the percentage of Freddie Mac SBL loans commitment volume in 2017, which carry lower servicing fees.

The increase in servicing revenue was primarily due to an increase in our servicing portfolio and the full period impact in 2017 of the Acquisition. Our servicing portfolio increased 20% from $13.56 billion at December 31, 2016 to $16.21 billion at December 31, 2017. Our servicing revenue, net in 2017 and 2016 includes $47.2 million and $21.7 million of amortization expense, respectively.

The increase in employee compensation and benefits expense is comprised of $48.8 million from our Agency Business and $4.7 million from our Structured Business. The increase in our Agency Business was primarily due to the full period impact in 2017 of the Acquisition, an increase in commissions and headcount as a result of portfolio growth and compensation expense recorded directly by the Agency Business, which was previously charged through the management fee prior to the internalization of our management team and termination of our existing management agreement with our Former Manager effective May 31, 2017. The $4.7 million, or 31%, increase from our Structured Business was primarily associated with the employees that transferred to us as a result of the internalization of our management team and termination of the existing management agreement.

The increase in selling and administrative expenses is comprised of $11.1 million from our Agency Business and $2.1 million from our Structured Business. The increase in our Agency Business is primarily due to the full period impact in 2017 of the Acquisition. The $2.1 million, or 21%, increase from our Structured Business was primarily due to an increase in professional fees, as well as rent expense that was recorded directly by the Structured Business, which was previously charged through the management fee prior to the Acquisition, as the lease contracts were assumed in connection with the Acquisition.

Acquisition costs in 2016 represent costs incurred related to the Acquisition, which was completed in July 2016. See Note 3—Acquisition of Our Former Manager's Agency Platform for details.

The increase in depreciation and amortization is comprised of $3.0 million from our Agency Business partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease from our Structured Business. The increase in our Agency Business is due to the full period impact in 2017 of the amortization of intangibles related to the Acquisition.

Impairment loss on real estate owned was $3.2 million and $11.2 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. During 2016, we determined that our hotel property exhibited indicators of impairment and, as a result, we recorded an impairment loss. The impairment loss in 2017 primarily relates to a further impairment of $2.7 million on this property resulting from additional market analyses received.

The decrease in our provision for loss sharing was primarily related to a $3.3 million reversal of a specific reserve related to a Fannie Mae DUS loan that settled with no loss share in our Agency Business, partially offset by the full period impact in 2017 of the Acquisition.

The decrease in management fee—related party was due to the internalization of our management team and termination of the existing management agreement with our Former Manager effective May 31, 2017.

During 2017, we purchased, at a discount, certain of our junior subordinated notes with a carrying value of $19.8 million and recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $7.1 million.

During 2016, we sold three multifamily properties and a hotel property for $50.7 million and recognized a gain of $11.6 million.

Loss from equity affiliates was $3.0 million in 2017 comprised primarily of a $5.5 million charge for our proportionate share of a litigation settlement and a $1.7 million loss incurred from our investment in a residential mortgage banking business, partially offset by distributions from other equity investments totaling $4.0 million. We recognized income from equity affiliates of $13.0 million in 2016 comprised primarily of $10.0 million of income from our investment in a residential mortgage banking business and a $2.8 million distribution from one of our investments. See Note 9—Investments in Equity Affiliates for details.

Our 2017 results of operations included the impact of the enactment of the Tax Reform, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among numerous provisions included in the new tax law was the reduction of the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The provision for income taxes for 2017 includes the newly enacted corporate federal income tax rate of 21% resulting in approximately a $5.3 million deferred income tax benefit, which is reflected in the consolidated statements of income. The deferred income tax benefit was primarily the result of applying the new lower income tax rates to our net long-term deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. The final impact of Tax Reform may differ due to, among other things, changes in interpretations, assumptions made by us, the issuance of additional guidance and actions we may take as a result of the Tax Reform.

The provision for income taxes was $13.4 million for 2017, which consisted of a current provision of $20.8 million and a deferred benefit of $7.4 million. The deferred tax benefit includes the effect of the reduction in the newly enacted corporate federal income tax rate on our Agency Buisiness. The

provision for income taxes primarily represents federal and state taxes related to the Agency Business, which was acquired by the TRS Consolidated Group in July 2016.

The noncontrolling interest relates to the 21,230,769 OP Units issued to satisfy a portion of the aggregate purchase price of the Acquisition, which represents approximately 25.6% of our outstanding stock at December 31, 2017. The OP Units are redeemable for cash, or at our option, for shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis.

The following table provides our consolidated operating results ($ in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,						Increase / (Decrease)

	2016			2015			Amount			Percent
Interest income	$	116,173		$	106,769		$	9,404			9	%
Other interest income, net		2,539			7,884			(5,345	)		(68	)%
Interest expense		63,623			49,720			13,903			28	%

Net interest income		55,089			64,933			(9,844	)		(15	)%

Other revenue:
Gain on sales, including fee-based services, net		24,594			—			24,594			nm
Mortgage servicing rights		44,941			—			44,941			nm
Servicing revenue, net		9,054			—			9,054			nm
Property operating income		14,881			27,666			(12,785	)		(46	)%
Other income, net		1,041			270			771			nm

Total other revenue		94,511			27,936			66,575			nm

Other expenses:
Employee compensation and benefits		38,647			17,500			21,147			121	%
Selling and administrative		17,587			9,392			8,195			87	%
Acquisition costs		10,262			3,134			7,128			nm
Property operating expenses		13,501			23,238			(9,737	)		(42	)%
Depreciation and amortization		5,022			5,436			(414	)		(8	)%
Impairment loss on real estate owned		11,200			—			11,200			nm
Provision for loss sharing		2,235			—			2,235			nm
Provision for loan losses (net of recoveries)		(134	)		4,467			(4,601	)		nm
Management fee—related party		12,600			10,900			1,700			16	%

Total other expenses		110,920			74,067			36,853			50	%

Income before gain on acceleration of deferred income, loss on termination of swaps, gain on sale of real estate, income from equity affiliates and provision for income taxes		38,680			18,802			19,878			106	%
Gain on acceleration of deferred income		—			19,172			(19,172	)		nm
Loss on termination of swaps		—			(4,630	)		4,630			nm
Gain on sale of real estate		11,631			7,784			3,847			49	%
Income from equity affiliates		12,995			12,301			694			6	%
Provision for income taxes		(825	)		—			(825	)		nm

Net income		62,481			53,429			9,052			17	%

Preferred stock dividends		7,554			7,554			—			—
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		12,131			—			12,131			nm

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	42,796		$	45,875		$	(3,079	)		(7	)%

	Year Ended December 31,

	2016							2015
	Average Carrying Value(1)		Interest Income / Expense		W/A Yield / Financing Cost(2)			Average Carrying Value(1)		Interest Income / Expense		W/A Yield / Financing Cost(2)
Structured Business interest-earning assets:
Bridge loans	$	1,510,811	$	95,211		6.28	%	$	1,348,245	$	88,816		6.59	%
Mezzanine / junior participation loans		111,018		7,762		6.97	%		138,328		10,175		7.36	%
Preferred equity investments		78,620		5,809		7.37	%		104,064		7,103		6.83	%
Securities		—		—		—			770		8		1.04	%

Core interest-earning assets		1,700,449		108,782		6.38	%		1,591,407		106,102		6.67	%
Cash equivalents		206,971		840		0.41	%		190,044		667		0.35	%

Total interest-earning assets	$	1,907,420		109,622		5.73	%	$	1,781,451		106,769		5.99	%



Structured Business interest-bearing liabilities:
CLO	$	846,324		30,239		3.56	%	$	600,643		20,619		3.43	%
Warehouse lines		181,169		6,427		3.54	%		231,339		7,249		3.12	%
Trust preferred		175,858		6,358		3.61	%		175,858		5,700		3.24	%
Unsecured debt		117,983		9,718		8.21	%		105,586		8,665		8.21	%
CDO		—		—		—			55,965		1,104		1.97	%
Other non-recourse		—		—		—			1,749		128		7.32	%
Interest rate swaps		—		5,201		—			—		6,255		—

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,321,334		57,943		4.37	%	$	1,171,140		49,720		4.25	%



Net interest income			$	51,679						$	57,049

Interest income increased $2.9 million, or 3%, for 2016 as compared to 2015, excluding $6.6 million of interest income associated with the Agency Business acquired. The impact of our average core interest-earning assets increasing 7% for 2016 was partially offset by a 4% decrease in the average yield on core interest-earning assets. The increase in our core interest-earning assets was primarily due to loan originations exceeding loan payoffs in 2016. The decrease in the average yield on core interest-earning assets was primarily due to $4.3 million in interest income and fee income from accelerated runoff in 2015, partially offset by $2.0 million of yield maintenance received on a loan payoff in the second quarter of 2016 and an increase in the average LIBOR rate.

Other interest income, net was $2.5 million and $7.9 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. During 2015, we acquired a $116.0 million defaulted first mortgage note, at par, that paid off. We initially recognized net other interest income of $7.9 million at the time the note paid off during 2015.

In 2016, additional funds held in escrow from the note payoff were released following an arbitration proceeding and we recognized net other interest income totaling $2.5 million.

Interest expense increased $8.2 million, or 17%, for 2016 as compared to 2015, excluding $5.7 million of interest expense associated with the Agency Business acquired. The increase was primarily due to a 13% increase in the average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities and a 3% increase in the average cost of our interest-bearing liabilities. The increase in the average debt balance was due to increased leverage on our portfolio, as well as an increase in the average loan balance from portfolio growth and the issuance of $86.3 million in convertible senior unsecured notes in the fourth quarter of 2016. The increase in the average cost of our interest-bearing liabilities was due to a period-over-period increase in the average LIBOR rate and a higher rate on the convertible senior unsecured notes issued as compared to our overall portfolio, partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in accelerated fees resulting from the unwind of several of our securitization vehicles and the termination of certain swaps in 2015.

Gain on sales, including fee-based services was $24.6 million for 2016. The agency loan sales for this period were $1.49 billion and the sales margin was 165 basis points.

Income from MSRs was $44.9 million for 2016. The loan commitments volume was $2.13 billion and the MSR rate was 211 basis points.

Servicing revenue was $9.1 million for 2016, which was comprised of servicing revenue of $30.8 million, partially offset by amortization of MSRs of $21.7 million. The Agency Business servicing portfolio was $13.56 billion with a weighted average servicing fee of 48 basis points at December 31, 2016.

Property operating results (income less expenses) decreased $3.0 million, or 69%, for 2016 as compared to 2015, primarily due to the sale of several properties during 2015 and 2016, partially offset by the addition of an office building in August 2015.

Employee compensation and benefits expense decreased $2.6 million, or 15%, for 2016 as compared to 2015, excluding $23.8 million of employee compensation and benefits expense associated with the Agency Business acquired. The decrease was primarily due to expenses totaling $2.2 million related to both the $116.0 million defaulted first mortgage that was repaid in 2015 and distributions received from one of our equity investments in 2015.

Selling and administrative expenses remained relatively flat for 2016 as compared to 2015, excluding $7.9 million of selling and administrative expenses associated with the Agency Business acquired.

Acquisition costs of $10.3 million and $3.1 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively, represent costs incurred related to the Acquisition, which was completed in July 2016. See Note 3—Acquisition of Our Manager's Agency Platform for details.

Depreciation and amortization decreased $3.0 million, or 55%, for 2016 as compared to 2015, excluding $2.6 million of depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired assets of the Agency Business. The decrease was primarily due to the sale of several real estate owned properties during 2015 and 2016.

Impairment loss on real estate owned was $11.2 million for 2016. During 2016, we determined that our hotel property exhibited indicators of impairment and, as a result, we recorded an impairment loss of $11.2 million.

The provision for loss sharing for 2016 represents our estimated total loss-sharing obligations needed to satisfy our partial guarantee for the performance of Agency Business loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program.

The decrease in provision for loan losses (net of recoveries) was primarily due to the recognition, in 2015, of a $6.5 million provision for loan losses related to five loans, which was partially offset by net recoveries of previously recorded loan losses of $2.0 million.

The increase in management fee—related party was primarily due to compensation related costs incurred by employees of our Former Manager in connection with services they performed related to the Agency Business acquired.

In connection with the unwind of our remaining collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs") in 2015, we recorded a $19.2 million gain that was previously deferred due to the reissuance of CDO bonds in 2010 as a result of a deferral of the gain from the extinguishment of trust preferred debt. See Note 12—Debt Obligations for details about this gain. We also terminated the basis and interest rate swaps associated with these CDOs and recognized a loss of $4.6 million. See Note 14—Derivative Financial Instruments for details about the swap termination.

During 2016, we sold three multifamily properties and a hotel property for $50.7 million and recognized a gain of $11.6 million. During 2015, we sold three hotel properties and a multifamily property for $41.1 million and recognized a gain of $7.8 million.

In 2016, we recognized income of $9.5 million from our investment in a residential mortgage banking business and $2.8 million from a distribution received from one of our equity investments. In 2015, we recognized income of $6.6 million from our investment in a residential mortgage banking business and received $5.5 million in distributions from one of our equity investments.

The provision for income taxes for 2016 includes a current provision of $2.4 million and a deferred benefit of $1.5 million. The provision is net of net operating losses of $11.4 million and the release of a valuation allowance of $5.4 million at the TRS Consolidated Group. The provision primarily represents federal and state taxes related to the Agency Business which was acquired by the TRS Consolidated Group in July 2016.

The noncontrolling interest relates to the 21,230,769 OP Units issued to our Former Manager to satisfy a portion of the aggregate purchase price of the Acquisition, which represents approximately 29.2% of our outstanding stock at December 31, 2016.

Sources of Liquidity. Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet our potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, satisfaction of collateral requirements under the Fannie Mae DUS risk-sharing agreement and, as an approved designated seller/servicer of Freddie Mac's SBL program, operational liquidity requirements of the GSE agencies, fund new loans and investments, fund operating costs and distributions to our stockholders, as well as other general business needs. Our primary sources of funds for liquidity consist of proceeds from equity and debt offerings, debt facilities and cash flows from our operations. We closely monitor our liquidity position and believe our existing sources of funds and access to additional liquidity will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs.

While we have been successful in obtaining proceeds from debt and equity offerings, CLOs and certain financing facilities, current conditions in the capital and credit markets have and may continue to make certain forms of financing less attractive and, in certain cases, less available. Therefore we will continue to rely, in part, on cash flows provided by operating and investing activities for working capital.

To maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT—taxable income. These distribution requirements limit our ability to retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital for operations. However, we believe that our capital resources and access to financing will provide us with financial flexibility and market responsiveness at levels sufficient to meet current and anticipated capital requirements.

Cash Flows. Cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $460.8 million during 2017 and consisted primarily of net cash inflows of $370.0 million, as a result of loan sales exceeding loan originations in our Agency Business, and net income, adjusted for noncash items, of $90.0 million. We had net cash inflows from loans-held-for-sale during 2017 due to the timing of agency loan sales, as agency loans are generally sold within 60 days of origination.

Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $907.9 million during 2017. Loan and investment activity (originations and payoffs/paydowns) comprise the bulk of our investing activities. Loan originations from our Structured Business totaling $1.87 billion, net of payoffs and paydowns of $959.7 million, resulted in net cash outflows of $907.7 million. Cash used in investing activities also includes a $27.2 million cash payment to purchase the B Piece bonds of the SBL program securitizations and a $25.0 million cash payment to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement with our Former Manager. The use of cash mentioned above was partially offset by $38.4 million increase of cash held to fund holdbacks and reserves on our loans and investments as a result of the growth in our loan portfolio.

Cash flows provided by financing activities totaled $412.8 million during 2017, and consisted primarily of $988.3 million of proceeds from CLOs and Debt Fund issuances, $157.5 million of net proceeds from the issuances of convertible senior unsecured notes and $76.2 million of net proceeds from a public offering of our common stock, partially offset by net cash outflows of $377.7 million from debt facility activities (facility paydowns were greater than funded loan originations), outflows of $219.0 million for the redemption of CLO IV, a $110.1 million increase in restricted cash (primarily from the payoff of loans in our CLO vehicles), $65.5 million in distributions to our stockholders and OP Unit holder and a $24.6 million payment for deferred financing costs.

Agency Business Requirements. The Agency Business is subject to supervision by certain regulatory agencies. Among other things, these agencies require us to meet certain minimum net worth, operational liquidity and restricted liquidity collateral requirements, purchase and loss obligations and compliance with reporting requirements. Our adjusted net worth and operational liquidity exceeded the agencies' requirements as of December 31, 2017. Our restricted liquidity and purchase and loss

obligations were satisfied with letters of credit totaling $47.0 million. See Note 16—Commitments and Contingencies for additional details about our performance regarding these requirements.

We also enter into contractual commitments with borrowers providing rate lock commitments while simultaneously entering into forward sale commitments with investors. These commitments are outstanding for short periods of time (generally less than 60 days) and are described in Note 14—Derivative Financial Instruments and Note 15—Fair Value.

Debt Facilities. We maintain various forms of short-term and long-term financing arrangements. Borrowings underlying these arrangements are primarily secured by a significant amount of our loans and investments and substantially all of our loans held-for-sale. The following is a summary of our debt facilities (in thousands):

These debt facilities, including their restrictive covenants, are described in detail in Note 12—Debt Obligations.

Contractual Obligations. As of December 31, 2017, we had the following material contractual obligations (in thousands):

(1): Represents principal amounts due based on contractual maturities. Excludes the total projected interest payments on our debt obligations of $88.9 million in 2018, $81.7 million in 2019, $62.1 million in 2020, $34.1 million in 2021, $13.7 million in 2022 and $103.5 million thereafter based on current LIBOR rates.
(2): Comprised of debt totaling $267.8 million for CLO V, $250.3 million for CLO VI, $279.0 million for CLO VII, $282.9 million for CLO VIII and $356.4 million for CLO IX with a weighted average contractual maturity of 1.95 years, 2.64 years, 1.94 years, 2.19 years and 2.99 years, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.
(3): The weighted average contractual maturity of the underlying loans is 2.45 years.
(4): Represents the face amount due upon maturity. The carrying value is $139.6 million, which is net of a deferred amount of $12.5 million and deferred financing fees of $2.2 million at December 31, 2017.
(5): Represents the total amount due at maturity, including scheduled increases to the principal balance if the debt remained outstanding until the end of the five-year term. In January 2018, we paid $50.0 million in full satisfaction of this debt.
(6): In accordance with certain loans and investments, we have outstanding unfunded commitments that we are obligated to fund as the borrowers meet certain requirements. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to, property renovations, building construction and building conversions based on criteria met by the borrower in accordance with the loan agreements. The payment due by period is based on the maturity date of underlying loans and is included in loans and investments, net in the consolidated balance sheet.
(7): Represents the operating lease payments due in connection with our lease of office space for our corporate headquarters and loan origination, support and servicing offices located throughout the U.S. Certain of the office leases have escalation clauses. The total rent expense was $4.6 million and $1.9 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements. At December 31, 2017, we had no off-balance-sheet arrangements.

Inflation. Changes in the general level of interest rates prevailing in the economy in response to changes in the rate of inflation generally have little effect on our income because the majority of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have floating rates of interest. See "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" below.

Agreements and Transactions with Related Parties. On May 31, 2017, we exercised our option to fully internalize our management team and terminated the existing management agreement with our Former Manager for $25.0 million. See Note 20—Agreements and Transactions with Related Parties for details of our related party transactions.

We enter into derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business through the origination and sale of mortgage loans and the management of potential loss exposure caused by fluctuations of interest rates. See Note 14—Derivative Financial Instruments for details surrounding our derivative financial instruments.

Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification™, the authoritative reference for accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("GAAP"). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts in our consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

A summary of our significant accounting policies is presented in Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies. Many of these accounting policies require judgment and the use of estimates and assumptions when applying these policies in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Each quarter, we assess these estimates and assumptions based on several factors, including historical experience, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are subject to change in the future if any of the underlying assumptions or factors change.

We present funds from operations ("FFO") and adjusted funds from operations ("AFFO") because we believe they are important supplemental measures of our operating performance in that they are frequently used by analysts, investors and other parties in the evaluation of REITs. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, defines FFO as net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of depreciated real properties, plus impairments of depreciated real properties and real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated ventures.

We define AFFO as funds from operations adjusted for accounting items such as non-cash stock-based compensation expense, income from MSRs, changes in fair value of certain derivatives that temporarily flow through earnings, amortization and write-offs of MSRs, deferred tax benefit and amortization of convertible senior notes conversion options. We also add back one-time charges such as acquisition costs and impairment losses on real estate and gains on sales of real estate. We are generally not in the business of operating real estate property and had obtained real estate by foreclosure or through partial or full settlement of mortgage debt related to our loans to maximize the value of the collateral and minimize our exposure. Therefore, we deem such impairment and gains on

real estate as an extension of the asset management of our loans, thus a recovery of principal or additional loss on our initial investment.

FFO and AFFO are not intended to be an indication of our cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) or a measure of our liquidity, nor is it entirely indicative of funding our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. Our calculation of FFO and AFFO may be different from the calculations used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited.

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017			2016			2015
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	65,835		$	42,796		$	45,875
Adjustments:
Gain on sale of real estate		—			(11,631	)		(7,784	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		24,120			12,131			—
Impairment loss on real estate owned		3,200			11,200			—
Depreciation—real estate owned		769			2,012			5,436
Depreciation—investments in equity affiliates		406			375			375

Funds from operations(1)	$	94,330		$	56,883		$	43,902
Adjustments:
Income from mortgage servicing rights		(76,820	)		(44,941	)		—
Impairment loss on real estate owned		(3,200	)		(11,200	)		—
Deferred tax benefit		(7,399	)		(1,532	)		—
Amortization and write-offs of MSRs		63,034			21,704			—
Depreciation and amortization		7,697			3,170			—
Net loss (gain) on changes in fair value of derivatives		1,398			(499	)		—
Gain on sale of real estate		—			11,631			7,784
Stock-based compensation		4,840			3,514			3,442
Acquisition costs		—			10,262			3,134

Adjusted funds from operations(1)	$	83,880		$	48,992		$	58,262



Diluted FFO per share(1)	$	1.17		$	0.92		$	0.86



Diluted AFFO per share(1)	$	1.04		$	0.79		$	1.14



Diluted weighted average shares outstanding(1)		80,311,252			61,649,847			51,007,328

Market risk is the exposure to loss due to factors that affect the overall performance of the financial markets such as changes in interest rates, availability of capital, equity prices, real estate values and credit ratings. The primary market risks that we are exposed to are capital markets risk, real estate values, credit risk and interest rate risk.

Capital Markets Risk. We are exposed to the risks related to the equity and debt capital markets and our ability to raise capital or finance our business operations through these markets. As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income annually, which significantly limits our ability to accumulate operating cash flow and, therefore, requires us to utilize the equity and debt

capital markets to finance our business. To mitigate this risk, we monitor both the equity and debt capital markets to make informed decisions on the amount, timing, type and terms of the capital we raise.

Real Estate Values and Credit Risk. Commercial mortgage assets may be viewed as exposing an investor to greater risk of loss than residential mortgage assets since such assets are typically secured by larger loans to fewer obligors than residential mortgage assets. Multifamily and commercial property values, net operating income derived from such properties, and borrowers' credit ratings are subject to volatility and may be negatively affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, events such as natural disasters, acts of war, terrorism, local economic and/or real estate conditions (such as industry slowdowns, oversupply of real estate space, occupancy rates, construction delays and costs) and other macroeconomic factors beyond our control. The performance and value of our loan and investment and servicing portfolios depend on the borrowers' ability to operate the properties that serve as collateral so that they produce adequate cash flow to pay their loans. We attempt to mitigate these risks through our underwriting and asset management processes. Our asset management team reviews our portfolios consistently and is in regular contact with borrowers to monitor the performance of the collateral and enforce our rights as necessary.

Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.

The operating results of our Structured Business depend in large part on differences between the income from our loans and our borrowing costs. Most of our Structured Business loans and borrowings are variable-rate instruments, based on LIBOR. The objective of this strategy is to minimize the impact of interest rate changes on our net interest income. We also have various fixed rate loans in our portfolio that are financed with variable rate LIBOR borrowings. Additionally, loans are sometimes extended and, consequently, do not pay off on their original maturity dates. If a loan is extended, our exposure to interest rate risk may be increased. In these instances, we could have a fixed rate loan financed with variable debt with no corresponding hedge, which may result in debt which is unprotected from interest rate risk. Some of our loans and borrowings are subject to interest rate floors. As a result, the impact of a change in interest rates may be different on our interest income than on our interest expense. We have utilized interest rate swaps in the past to limit interest rate risk. Derivatives are used for hedging purposes rather than speculation. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes.

The following table projects the potential impact on interest income and interest expense for a 12-month period, assuming an instantaneous increase or decrease of both 25 and 50 basis points in LIBOR (in thousands).

In the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, defaults could increase and result in credit losses to us, which could adversely affect our liquidity and operating results. Further, such delinquencies or defaults could have an adverse effect on the spreads between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Our Agency Business originates, sells and services a range of multifamily finance products with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and HUD. Our loans held-for-sale to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and HUD are not currently exposed to interest rate risk during the loan commitment, closing and delivery process. The sale or placement of each loan to an investor is negotiated prior to closing on the loan with the borrower, and the sale or placement is generally effectuated within 60 days of closing. The coupon rate for the loan is set after we established the interest rate with the investor.

In addition, the fair value of our MSRs is subject to market risk since a significant driver of the fair value of these assets is the discount rates. A 100 basis point increase in the weighted average discount rate would decrease the fair value of our MSRs by approximately $9.0 million as of December 31, 2017, while a 100 basis point decrease would increase the fair value by approximately $9.5 million.

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We did not audit the 2016 financial statements of Cardinal Financial Company, Limited Partnership, in which the Company has a 16.3% interest as of December 31, 2016. In the consolidated financial statements, the Company's investment in Cardinal Financial Company, Limited Partnership is stated at $25,765,775 as of December 31, 2016 and the Company's equity in the net income of Cardinal Financial Company, Limited Partnership is stated at $9,487,795 in 2016. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Cardinal Financial Company, Limited Partnership, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 23, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2003.
New York, New York
February 23, 2018

To the Partners
Cardinal Financial Company, Limited Partnership
Charlotte, North Carolina

We have audited the balance sheet of Cardinal Financial Company, Limited Partnership (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented separately herein). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cardinal Financial Company, Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

($ in thousands, except share and per share data)

	December 31,

	2017			2016
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	104,374		$	138,645
Restricted cash		139,398			29,315
Loans and investments, net		2,579,127			1,695,732
Loans held-for-sale, net		297,443			673,367
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net		252,608			227,743
Securities held-to-maturity, net		27,837			—
Investments in equity affiliates		23,653			33,949
Real estate owned, net		16,787			19,492
Due from related party		688			1,465
Goodwill and other intangible assets		121,766			97,490
Other assets		62,264			53,588

Total assets	$	3,625,945		$	2,970,786



Liabilities and Equity:
Credit facilities and repurchase agreements	$	528,573		$	906,637
Collateralized loan obligations		1,418,422			728,441
Debt fund		68,084			—
Senior unsecured notes		95,280			94,522
Convertible senior unsecured notes, net		231,287			80,660
Junior subordinated notes to subsidiary trust issuing preferred securities		139,590			157,859
Related party financing		50,000			50,000
Due to related party		—			6,039
Due to borrowers		99,829			81,019
Allowance for loss-sharing obligations		30,511			32,408
Other liabilities		99,813			86,163

Total liabilities		2,761,389			2,223,748

Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
Equity:
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, cumulative, redeemable, $0.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized; special voting preferred shares; 21,230,769 shares issued and outstanding; 8.25% Series A, $38,788 aggregate liquidation preference; 1,551,500 shares issued and outstanding; 7.75% Series B, $31,500 aggregate liquidation preference; 1,260,000 shares issued and outstanding; 8.50% Series C, $22,500 aggregate liquidation preference; 900,000 shares issued and outstanding		89,508			89,508
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 500,000,000 shares authorized; 61,723,387 and 51,401,295 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		617			514
Additional paid-in capital		707,450			621,932
Accumulated deficit		(101,926	)		(125,134	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		176			321

Total Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. stockholders' equity		695,825			587,141
Noncontrolling interest		168,731			159,897

Total equity		864,556			747,038

Total liabilities and equity	$	3,625,945		$	2,970,786

ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

($ in thousands, except share and per share data)

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017			2016			2015
Interest income	$	156,177		$	116,173		$	106,769
Other interest income, net		—			2,539			7,884
Interest expense		90,072			63,623			49,720

Net interest income		66,105			55,089			64,933

Other revenue:
Gain on sales, including fee-based services, net		72,799			24,594			—
Mortgage servicing rights		76,820			44,941			—
Servicing revenue, net		29,210			9,054			—
Property operating income		10,973			14,881			27,666
Other income, net		685			1,041			270

Total other revenue		190,487			94,511			27,936

Other expenses:
Employee compensation and benefits		92,126			38,647			17,500
Selling and administrative		30,738			17,587			9,392
Acquisition costs		—			10,262			3,134
Property operating expenses		10,482			13,501			23,238
Depreciation and amortization		7,385			5,022			5,436
Impairment loss on real estate owned		3,200			11,200			—
Provision for loss sharing (net of recoveries)		(259	)		2,235			—
Provision for loan losses (net of recoveries)		(456	)		(134	)		4,467
Management fee—related party		6,673			12,600			10,900

Total other expenses		149,889			110,920			74,067

Income before gain on extinguishment of debt, gain on acceleration of deferred income, loss on termination of swaps, gain on sale of real estate, (loss) income from equity affiliates and provision for income taxes		106,703			38,680			18,802
Gain on extinguishment of debt		7,116			—			—
Gain on acceleration of deferred income		—			—			19,172
Loss on termination of swaps		—			—			(4,630	)
Gain on sale of real estate		—			11,631			7,784
(Loss) income from equity affiliates		(2,951	)		12,995			12,301
Provision for income taxes		(13,359	)		(825	)		—

Net income		97,509			62,481			53,429

Preferred stock dividends		7,554			7,554			7,554
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		24,120			12,131			—

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	65,835		$	42,796		$	45,875



Basic earnings per common share	$	1.14		$	0.83		$	0.90



Diluted earnings per common share	$	1.12		$	0.83		$	0.90



Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		57,890,574			51,305,095			50,857,750



Diluted		80,311,252			51,730,553			51,007,328

ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)

		Preferred Stock Value				Common Stock Par Value		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. Stockholders' Equity			Noncontrolling Interest			Total Equity

Balance—December 31, 2014	3,711,500	$	89,296	50,477,308		$	505	$	612,806	$	(152,483	)	$	(14,668	)	$	535,456		$	—		$	535,456
Stock-based compensation				486,124			5		3,438								3,443						3,443
Forfeiture of unvested restricted stock				(916	)												—						—
Distributions—common stock											(29,495	)					(29,495	)					(29,495	)
Distributions—preferred stock											(7,554	)					(7,554	)					(7,554	)
Distributions—preferred stock of private REIT											(14	)					(14	)					(14	)
Net income											53,429						53,429						53,429
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale														71			71						71
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net														(1,019	)		(1,019	)					(1,019	)
Reclassification of net realized loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges into loss on termination of swaps														4,626			4,626						4,626
Reclassification of net realized loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges into earnings														6,149			6,149						6,149

Balance—December 31, 2015	3,711,500	$	89,296	50,962,516		$	510	$	616,244	$	(136,117	)	$	(4,841	)	$	565,092		$	—		$	565,092
Issuance of special voting preferred shares and operating partnership units	21,230,769		212														212			154,560			154,772
Stock-based compensation				439,780			4		3,509								3,513						3,513
Forfeiture of unvested restricted stock				(1,001	)												—						—
Issuance of convertible senior unsecured notes, net									2,179								2,179						2,179
Distributions—common stock											(31,798	)					(31,798	)					(31,798	)
Distributions—preferred stock											(7,554	)					(7,554	)					(7,554	)
Distributions—preferred stock of private REIT											(15	)					(15	)					(15	)
Distributions—noncontrolling interest																				(6,794	)		(6,794	)
Net income											50,350						50,350			12,131			62,481
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale														147			147						147
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net														(193	)		(193	)					(193	)
Reclassification of net realized loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges into earnings														5,208			5,208						5,208

Balance—December 31, 2016	24,942,269	$	89,508	51,401,295		$	514	$	621,932	$	(125,134	)	$	321		$	587,141		$	159,897		$	747,038
Issuance of common stock				9,500,000			95		76,130								76,225						76,225
Stock-based compensation				827,283			8		4,832								4,840						4,840
Forfeiture of unvested restricted stock				(5,191	)												—						—
Issuance of convertible senior unsecured notes, net									4,556								4,556						4,556
Distributions—common stock											(42,612	)					(42,612	)					(42,612	)
Distributions—preferred stock											(7,554	)					(7,554	)					(7,554	)
Distributions—preferred stock of private REIT											(15	)					(15	)					(15	)
Distributions—noncontrolling interest																				(15,286	)		(15,286	)
Net income											73,389						73,389			24,120			97,509
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale														(382	)		(382	)					(382	)
Reclassification of net realized loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges into earnings														237			237						237

Balance—December 31, 2017	24,942,269	$	89,508	61,723,387		$	617	$	707,450	$	(101,926	)	$	176		$	695,825		$	168,731		$	864,556

ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017			2016			2015
Operating activities:
Net income	$	97,509		$	62,481		$	53,429
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		7,385			5,022			5,436
Stock-based compensation		4,840			3,514			3,443
Amortization and accretion of interest and fees, net		4,682			4,563			1,575
Amortization of capitalized mortgage servicing rights		47,202			21,705			—
Originations of loans held-for-sale		(4,444,939	)		(2,154,732	)		—
Proceeds from sales of loans held-for-sale, net of gain on sale		4,814,906			1,916,470			—
Payoffs and paydowns of loans held-for-sale		132			—			—
Mortgage servicing rights		(76,820	)		(44,941	)		—
Write-off of capitalized mortgage servicing rights from payoffs		15,832			5,796			—
Impairment loss on real estate owned		3,200			11,200			—
Provision for loan losses (net of recoveries)		(456	)		(134	)		4,467
Provision for loss sharing (net of recoveries)		(259	)		2,235			—
Net charge-offs for loss sharing obligations		(1,638	)		(2,444	)		—
Gain on extinguishment of debt		(7,116	)		—			—
Gain on sale of real estate		—			(11,631	)		(7,784	)
Deferred tax benefit		(7,399	)		—			—
Loss (income) from equity affiliates		2,951			(12,995	)		(12,301	)
Loss on termination of swaps		—			—			4,630
Gain on acceleration of deferred income		—			—			(19,172	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		822			(3,727	)		2,625

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		460,834			(197,618	)		36,348

Investing Activities:
Loans and investments funded, originated and purchased, net		(1,867,393	)		(870,166	)		(985,008	)
Payoffs and paydowns of loans and investments		959,696			667,902			985,789
Internalization of management team		(25,000	)		—			—
Acquisition of the Agency Business, net of cash acquired		—			(68,356	)		—
Deferred fees		10,982			11,938			4,876
Investments in real estate, net		(672	)		(588	)		(2,224	)
Contributions to equity affiliates		(693	)		(6,091	)		(19,324	)
Distributions from equity affiliates		4,671			12,452			—
Proceeds from sale of real estate, net		—			49,030			40,077
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities		—			1,567			—
Due to borrowers and reserves		38,372			395			—
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity, net		(27,173	)		—			—
Payoffs and paydowns of securities held-to-maturity		460			—			—
Purchases of capitalized mortgage servicing rights		(1,199	)		—			—
Purchases of securities, net		—			—			(1,552	)
Principal collection on securities, net		—			—			2,100

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(907,949	)		(201,917	)		24,734

Financing activities:
Proceeds from repurchase agreements, loan participations, credit facilities and notes payable		8,215,669			3,922,394			593,878
Paydowns and payoffs of repurchase agreements, loan participations and credit facilities		(8,593,411	)		(3,571,929	)		(636,940	)
Payoffs of junior subordinated notes to subsidiary trust issuing preferred securities		(12,691	)		—			—
Paydowns and payoffs of mortgage note payable—real estate owned		—			(27,155	)		(30,984	)
Proceeds from collateralized loan obligations		918,274			250,250			486,750
Proceeds from Debt Fund		70,000			—			—
Payoffs and paydowns of collateralized loan obligations		(219,000	)		(281,250	)		(177,000	)
Proceeds from convertible senior unsecured notes		157,500			86,250			—
Payoffs and paydowns of collateralized debt obligations		—			—			(312,071	)
Proceeds from mortgage note payable—real estate owned		—			—			27,155
Change in restricted cash		(110,109	)		23,089			169,710
Receipts on swaps and returns of margin calls from counterparties		430			4,600			4,840
Distributions paid on common stock		(42,612	)		(31,798	)		(29,495	)
Distributions paid on noncontrolling interest		(15,286	)		(6,794	)		—
Distributions paid on preferred stock		(7,554	)		(7,554	)		(7,554	)
Distributions paid on preferred stock of private REIT		(15	)		(15	)		(14	)
Payment of deferred financing costs		(24,576	)		(10,617	)		(10,776	)
Payments on swaps and margin calls to counterparties		—			—			(290	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		76,225			—			—

Net cash provided by financing activities		412,844			349,471			77,209

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(34,271	)		(50,064	)		138,291
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		138,645			188,709			50,418

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	104,374		$	138,645		$	188,709

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017		2016		2015
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash used to pay interest	$	75,582	$	53,012	$	43,939



Cash used to pay taxes	$	20,823	$	264	$	287



Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Distributions accrued on 8.25% Series A preferred stock	$	267	$	267	$	267



Distributions accrued on 7.75% Series B preferred stock	$	203	$	203	$	203



Distributions accrued on 8.50% Series C preferred stock	$	159	$	159	$	159



Fair value of conversion feature of convertible senior unsecured notes	$	4,703	$	2,280	$	—



Related party financing	$	—	$	50,000	$	—



Issuance of special voting preferred shares and operating partnership units in connection with the Acquisition	$	—	$	154,772	$	—



Investments transferred from real estate owned, net to real estate held-for-sale, net	$	—	$	—	$	26,186



Loan transferred to real estate owned, net	$	—	$	—	$	5,900



Satisfaction of participation loan	$	—	$	—	$	1,300



Retirement of participation liability	$	—	$	—	$	1,300



Reclassification of deferred financing costs from other assets to debt	$	—	$	—	$	17,429

ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2017

Arbor is a Maryland corporation formed in 2003. Through our Structured Business, we invest in a diversified portfolio of structured finance assets in the multifamily and commercial real estate markets, primarily consisting of bridge and mezzanine loans, including junior participating interests in first mortgages, preferred and direct equity. We may also directly acquire real property and invest in real estate-related notes and certain mortgage-related securities. Through our Agency Business, we originate, sell and service a range of multifamily finance products through Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, FHA, HUD and CMBS programs. We retain the servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on substantially all loans we originate and sell under the GSE and HUD programs. We are an approved Fannie Mae DUS lender nationally, a Freddie Mac Multifamily Conventional Loan lender, seller/servicer, in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, a Freddie Mac affordable, manufactured housing, senior housing and SBL lender, seller/servicer, nationally and a HUD MAP and LEAN senior housing/healthcare lender nationally.

Prior to May 31, 2017, we were externally managed and advised by ACM. Effective May 31, 2017, we exercised our option to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement. See Note 3—Acquisition of Our Former Manager's Agency Platform for details.

Substantially all of our operations are conducted through our operating partnership, ARLP, for which we serve as the general partner, and ARLP's subsidiaries. We are organized to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. See Note 19—Income Taxes for details.

The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature.

During the third quarter of 2017, we determined that the purchase price allocation related to the Acquisition in 2016 incorrectly omitted a deferred tax liability related to the book-to-tax difference in the value assigned to certain assets acquired. The impact of this omission to our 2016 consolidated financial statements was a $4.9 million understatement of goodwill and a corresponding understatement of other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. This omission had no impact on our results of operations and was corrected in the third quarter of 2017, resulting in a $4.9 million increase to goodwill and a corresponding increase in other liabilities.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our financial statements and the financial statements of our wholly owned subsidiaries, partnerships and other joint ventures in which we own a controlling interest, including variable interest entities ("VIEs") of which we are the primary beneficiary. Entities in which we have a significant influence are accounted for under the equity method. See Note 17—Variable Interest Entities for information about our VIEs. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that could materially affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. As future events cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. We place our cash and cash equivalents in high quality financial institutions. The consolidated account balances at each institution periodically exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance coverage and we believe that this risk is not significant.

Loans, Investments and Securities. Loans held for investment are intended to be held to maturity and, accordingly, are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan origination costs and fees, loan purchase discounts, and net of the allowance for loan losses when such loan or investment is deemed to be impaired. We invest in preferred equity interests that, in some cases, allow us to participate in a percentage of the underlying property's cash flows from operations and proceeds from a sale or refinancing. At the inception of each such investment, we determine whether such investment should be accounted for as a loan, equity interest or as real estate. To date, we have determined that all such investments are properly accounted for and reported as loans.

At the time of purchase, we designate a security as available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, or trading depending on our ability and intent for the security. Securities available-for-sale, which are included as a component of other assets in the consolidated balance sheets, are reported at fair value with the net unrealized gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Unrealized losses that are determined to be other-than-temporary are recognized in earnings up to their credit component. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at cost net of any unamortized premiums or discounts, which are amortized or accreted over the life of the securities. For securities classified as held-to-maturity, an evaluation is performed of whether a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis is other-than-temporary.

The determination of other-than-temporary impairment is a subjective process requiring judgments and assumptions and is not necessarily intended to indicate a permanent decline in value. The process includes, but is not limited to, assessment of recent market events and prospects for near-term recovery, assessment of cash flows, internal review of the underlying assets securing the investments, credit of the issuer and the rating of the security, as well as our ability and intent to hold the investment to maturity. We closely monitor market conditions on which we base such decisions.

Impaired Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and Charge-offs. We consider a loan impaired when, based upon current information, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due for both principal and interest according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. We evaluate each loan in our portfolio on a quarterly basis. Our loans are individually specific and unique as it relates to product type, geographic location, and collateral type, as well as to the rights and remedies and the

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

position in the capital structure our loans have in relation to the underlying collateral. We evaluate this information at both a loan level and general market trends level when determining the appropriate assumptions such as capitalization and market discount rates, as well as the borrower's operating income and cash flows, in estimating the value of the underlying collateral when determining if a loan is impaired. We utilize internally developed valuation models and techniques primarily consisting of discounted cash flow and direct capitalization models in determining the fair value of the underlying collateral on an individual loan. We may also obtain a third party appraisal, which may value the collateral through an "as-is" or "stabilized value" methodology. Such appraisals may be used as an additional source of valuation information only and no adjustments are made to appraisals.

If upon completion of the valuation, the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the impaired loan is less than the net carrying value of the loan, an allowance is created with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. The allowance for each loan is maintained at a level that we believe to be adequate to absorb probable losses.

Loan terms may be modified if we determine that based on the individual circumstances of a loan and the underlying collateral, a modification would more likely increase the total recovery of the combined principal and interest from the loan. Any loan modification is predicated upon a goal of maximizing the collection of the loan. Typical triggers for a modification would include situations where the projected cash flow is insufficient to cover required debt service, when asset performance is lagging the initial projections, where there is a requirement for rebalancing, where there is an impending maturity of the loan, and where there is an actual loan default. Loan terms that have been modified have included, but are not limited to, interest rate, maturity date and in certain cases, principal amount. Length and amounts of each modification have varied based on individual circumstances and are determined on a case by case basis. If the loan modification constitutes a concession whereas we do not receive ample consideration in return for the modification, and the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and cannot repay the loan under the current terms, then the modification is considered by us to be a troubled debt restructuring. If we receive a benefit, either monetary or strategic, and the above criteria are not met, the modification is not considered to be a troubled debt restructuring. We record interest on modified loans on an accrual basis to the extent the modified loan is contractually current.

Charge-offs to the allowance for loan losses occur when losses are confirmed through the receipt of cash or other consideration from the completion of a sale; when a modification or restructuring takes place in which we grant a concession to a borrower or agree to a discount in full or partial satisfaction of the loan; when we take ownership and control of the underlying collateral in full satisfaction of the loan; when loans are reclassified as other investments; or when significant collection efforts have ceased and it is highly likely that a loss has been realized.

Loss on restructured loans is recorded when we have granted a concession to the borrower in the form of principal forgiveness related to the payoff or the substitution or addition of a new debtor for the original borrower or when we incur costs on behalf of the borrower related to the modification, payoff or the substitution or addition of a new debtor for the original borrower. When a loan is restructured, we record our investment at net realizable value, taking into account the cost of all concessions at the date of restructuring. In addition, a gain or loss may be recorded upon the sale of a loan to a third party in the consolidated statements of income in the period in which the loan was sold.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Loans Held-for-Sale, Net. Loans held-for-sale, net represents commercial real estate loans originated in our Agency Business, which are generally transferred or sold within 60 days from the date the loan is funded. Such loans are reported at the lower of cost or market on an aggregate basis and include the value allocated to the associated future MSRs. During the period prior to its sale, interest income on a loan held-for-sale is calculated in accordance with the terms of the individual loan and the loan origination fees and direct loan origination costs are deferred until the loan is sold. All of our held-for-sale loans are financed with matched borrowings from credit facilities contracted to finance such loans. Interest income and expense are earned or incurred after a loan is closed and before a loan is sold.

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated, put presumptively beyond the reach of the entity, even in bankruptcy, (2) the transferee (or if the transferee is an entity whose sole purpose is to engage in securitization and the entity is constrained from pledging or exchanging the assets it receives, each third-party holder of its beneficial interests) has the right to pledge or exchange the transferred financial assets, and (3) we or our agents does not maintain effective control over the transferred financial assets or third-party beneficial interest related to those transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. We have determined that all loans sold have met these specific conditions and account for all transfers of mortgage loans as completed sales.

Allowance for Loss-Sharing Obligations. When a loan is sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program, we undertake an obligation to partially guarantee the performance of the loan. Generally, we are responsible for losses equal to the first 5% of the UPB and a portion of any additional losses to an overall maximum of 20% of the original principal balance. Fannie Mae bears any remaining loss. In addition, under the terms of the master loss-sharing agreement with Fannie Mae, we are responsible for funding 100% of mortgage delinquencies (principal and interest) and servicing advances (taxes, insurance and foreclosure costs) until the amounts advanced exceeds 5% of the UPB at the date of default. Thereafter, we may request interim loss-sharing adjustments which allow us to fund 25% of such advances until final settlement.

At inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guaranty is recognized. In determining the fair value of the guaranty obligation, we consider the risk profile of the collateral and the historical loss experience in our portfolio. The guaranty obligation is removed only upon either the expiration or settlement of the guaranty.

We evaluate the allowance for loss-sharing obligations by monitoring the performance of each loss-sharing loan for events or conditions that may signal a potential default. Historically, initial loss recognition occurs at or before a loan becomes 60 days delinquent. In instances where payment under the guaranty on a loan is determined to be probable and estimable (as the loan is probable of, or is, in foreclosure), we record a liability for the estimated allowance for loss-sharing (a "specific reserve") by transferring the guarantee obligation recorded on the loan to the specific reserve with any adjustments to this reserve amount recorded in provision for loss sharing in the statements of income. The amount of the allowance considers our assessment of the likelihood of repayment by the borrower or key principal(s), the risk characteristics of the loan, the loan's risk rating, historical loss experience, adverse situations affecting individual loans, the estimated disposition value of the underlying collateral, and the

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

level of risk sharing. We regularly monitor the specific reserves and update loss estimates as current information is received.

Capitalized Mortgage Servicing Rights. We recognize, as separate assets, rights to service mortgage loans for others, including such rights from our origination of mortgage loans sold with the servicing rights retained, as well as rights associated with acquired MSRs. Income from MSRs related to loans we originate are recognized when we record a derivative asset upon the commitment to originate a loan with a borrower and sell the loan to an investor. This commitment asset is recognized at fair value based on our internal model, which reflects the estimated fair value of the discounted expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan. When a mortgage loan we originate is sold, we retain the right to service the loan and recognize the MSR at the initial capitalized valuation. We amortize our MSRs using the amortization method, which requires the MSRs to be amortized over the period of estimated net servicing income or loss and that the servicing assets or liabilities be assessed for impairment, or increased obligation, based on the fair value at each reporting date. Amortization of MSRs is recorded as a reduction of servicing revenues, net in the consolidated statements of income. The following assumptions were used in calculating the fair value of our MSRs for the periods presented:

Key rates: We used discount rates ranging from 8% to 15%, representing a weighted average discount rate of 13%, based on our best estimate of market discount rates to determine the present value of MSRs. The inflation rate used for adequate compensation was 3%.

Servicing Cost: A market participant's estimated future cost to service the loan for the estimated life of the MSR is subtracted from the estimated future cash flows.

Estimated Life: We estimate the life of our MSRs based upon the stated yield maintenance and/or prepayment protection term of the underlying loan and may be reduced based upon the expiration of various types of prepayment penalty and/or lockout provisions prior to that stated maturity date.

MSRs are initially recorded at fair value and are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of MRSs from loans we originate and sell are estimated considering market prices for similar MSRs, when available, and by estimating the present value of the future net cash flows of the capitalized MSRs, net of adequate compensation for servicing. Adequate compensation is based on the market rate of similar servicing contracts. The fair value of MSRs acquired approximate the purchase price paid. We estimate the terms of commercial servicing for each loan by assuming that servicing would not end prior to the yield maintenance date, if applicable, at which point the prepayment penalty expires.

We evaluate the MSR portfolio for impairment on a quarterly basis based on the difference between the aggregate carrying amount of the MSRs and their aggregate fair value. We engage an independent third-party valuation expert to assist in determining an estimated fair value of our MSR portfolio on a quarterly basis. For purposes of impairment evaluation, the MSRs are stratified based on predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans, which we have identified as loan type, note rate and yield maintenance provisions. To the extent that the carrying value of the MSRs exceeds fair value, a valuation allowance is established.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

We record write-offs of MSRs related to loans that were repaid prior to their expected maturity and loans that have defaulted and determined to be unrecoverable. When this occurs, the write-off is recorded as a direct write-down to the carrying value of MSRs and is included as a component of servicing revenue, net in the consolidated statements of income. This direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of the MSRs, precluding recognition of subsequent recoveries. For loans that payoff prior to maturity, we may collect a prepayment fee which is included as a component of servicing revenue, net.

Real Estate Owned and Held-For-Sale. Real estate acquired is recorded at its estimated fair value at the time of acquisition and is shown net of accumulated depreciation and impairment charges. Costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of a property are expensed as incurred.

We allocate the purchase price of our real estate acquisitions to land, building, tenant improvements, origination asset of the in-place leases, intangibles for the value of any above or below market leases at fair value and to any other identified intangible assets or liabilities. We finalize our purchase price allocation on these assets within one year of the acquisition date. We amortize the value allocated to in-place leases over the remaining lease term, which is reported in depreciation and amortization expense on our consolidated statements of income. The value allocated to above or below market leases are amortized over the remaining lease term as an adjustment to rental income.

Real estate assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Ordinary repairs and maintenance which are not reimbursed by the tenants are expensed as incurred. Major replacements and betterments which improve or extend the life of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful life.

Our properties are reviewed for impairment each quarter, if events or circumstances change indicating that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We recognize impairment if the undiscounted estimated cash flows to be generated by an asset is less than the carrying amount of such asset. Measurement of impairment is based on the asset's estimated fair value. In the evaluation of a property for impairment, many factors are considered, including estimated current and expected operating cash flows from the property during the projected holding period, costs necessary to extend the life or improve the asset, expected capitalization rates, projected stabilized net operating income, selling costs, and the ability to hold and dispose of the asset in the ordinary course of business. Impairment charges may be necessary in the event discount rates, capitalization rates, lease-up periods, future economic conditions, and other relevant factors vary significantly from those assumed in valuing the property.

Real estate is classified as held-for-sale when we commit to a plan of sale, the asset is available for immediate sale, there is an active program to locate a buyer, and it is probable the sale will be completed within one year. Real estate assets that are expected to be disposed of are valued at the lower of the asset's carrying amount or its fair value less costs to sell.

We recognize sales of real estate properties upon closing. Payments received from purchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits. Gain on real estate sold is recognized using the full accrual method when the collectability of the sale price is reasonably assured and we are not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale. A gain may be deferred in whole or in part until collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured and the earnings process is complete.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Investments in Equity Affiliates. We invest in joint ventures that are formed to invest in real estate related assets or businesses. These joint ventures are not majority owned or controlled by us, or are VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary, and are not consolidated in our financial statements. These investments are recorded under either the equity or cost method of accounting as deemed appropriate. We evaluate these investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss if the estimated fair value of the investment is less than its carrying amount and we determine that the impairment is other-than-temporary. We record our share of the net income and losses from the underlying properties of our equity method investments and any other-than-temporary impairment on these investments on a single line item in the consolidated statements of income as income or losses from equity affiliates.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Significant judgement is required to estimate the fair value of intangible assets and in assigning their estimated useful lives. Accordingly, we typically seek the assistance of independent third party valuation specialists for significant intangible assets. The fair value estimates are based on available historical information and on future expectations and assumptions we deem reasonable.

We generally use an income based valuation method to estimate the fair value of intangible assets, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value using estimates and assumptions we deem reasonable. For intangible assets related to acquired technology, we use the replacement cost method to determine fair value.

Determining the estimated useful lives of intangible assets also requires judgment. Certain intangible assets, such as GSE licenses, have been deemed to have indefinite lives while other intangible assets, such as broker and borrower relationships, above/below market rent and acquired technology have been deemed to have finite lives. Our assessment as to which intangible assets are deemed to have finite or indefinite lives is based on several factors including economic barriers of entry for the acquired product lines, scarcity of available GSE licenses, technology life cycles, retention trends and our operating plans, among other factors.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, while finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets on a straight-line basis. Indefinite-lived intangible assets, including goodwill, are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. In addition, with respect to goodwill, an impairment analysis is performed at least annually. We have elected to make the first day of our fiscal fourth quarter the annual impairment assessment date for goodwill. We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value. If, based on that assessment, we believe it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then a two-step goodwill impairment test is performed. Based on the impairment analysis performed as of October 1, 2017, there was no indication that the indefinite-lived intangible assets, including goodwill, were impaired and there were no events or changes in circumstances indicating impairment at December 31, 2017.

Business Combinations. Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, under which the purchase price is allocated to the fair value of the assets acquired and

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the amount allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed made during the measurement period are recorded in the period in which the adjustment is identified, with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill. If any adjustments are made subsequent to the measurement period, which could be up to one year after the acquisition date, these adjustments are recorded to the consolidated statements of income. Acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred.

Hedging Activities and Derivatives. We measure derivative instruments at fair value and record them as assets or liabilities. Fair value adjustments will affect either accumulated other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings, or net income depending on whether the derivative instrument qualifies as a hedge for accounting purposes and, if so, the nature of the hedging activity. We use derivatives for hedging purposes rather than trading or speculation. Fair values are estimated based on current market data from financial sources that trade such instruments and are based on prevailing market data and derived from third party proprietary models based on well recognized financial principles and reasonable estimates about relevant future market conditions.

The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. These derivative instruments must be effective in reducing risk exposure in order to qualify for hedge accounting. When the terms of an underlying transaction are modified, or when the underlying hedged item ceases to exist, all changes in the fair value of the instrument are marked-to-market with changes in value included in net income for each period until the derivative instrument matures or is settled. Any derivative instrument used for risk management that does not meet the hedging criteria is marked-to-market with the changes in value included in earnings. In cases where a derivative instrument is terminated early, any gain or loss is generally amortized over the remaining life of the hedged item. We may also enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or we elect not to apply hedge accounting. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings.

In connection with our interest rate risk management, we may hedge a portion of our interest rate risk by entering into derivative instrument contracts to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of our expected cash receipts and our expected cash payments principally related to our investments and borrowings. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest income and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we have used, and may again in the future, use interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

Our rate lock and forward sales commitments associated with the Agency Business meet the definition of a derivative and are recorded at fair value. The estimated fair value of rate lock commitments includes the effects of interest rate movements as well as the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan which is recorded as income from MSRs in the consolidated statements of income. The estimated fair value of forward sale commitments includes the effects of interest rate movements between the trade date and balance sheet date. Adjustments to the fair value are reflected as a component of other income, net in the consolidated statements of income.

Revenue Recognition. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis as it is earned. In certain instances, the borrower pays an additional amount of interest at the time the loan is closed, an origination fee, a prepayment fee and/or deferred interest upon maturity. In some cases, interest income may also include the amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts arising from the purchase or origination of the loan or security. This additional income, net of any direct loan origination costs incurred, is deferred and accreted into interest income on an effective yield or "interest" method adjusted for actual prepayment activity over the life of the related loan or security as a yield adjustment. Income recognition is suspended for loans when, in our opinion, a full recovery of all contractual principal is not probable. Income recognition is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is resumed. We record interest income on certain impaired loans to the extent cash is received, as the borrower continues to make interest payments. We record loan loss reserves related to these loans when it is deemed that full recovery of principal and accrued interest is not probable.

Several of our loans provide for accrual of interest at specified rates, which differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to our determination that accrued interest and outstanding principal are ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the asset. If we cannot make this determination, interest income above the current pay rate is recognized only upon actual receipt.

Given the transitional nature of some of our real estate loans, we may require funds to be placed into an interest reserve, based on contractual requirements, to cover debt service costs. We will analyze these interest reserves on a periodic basis and determine if any additional interest reserves are needed. Recognition of income on loans with funded interest reserves are accounted for in the same manner as loans without funded interest reserves. We do not recognize interest income on loans in which the borrower has failed to make the contractual interest payment due or has not replenished the interest reserve account. Income from non-performing loans is generally recognized on a cash basis only to the extent it is received. Full income recognition will resume when the loan becomes contractually current and performance has recommenced.

Additionally, interest income is recorded when earned from equity participation interests, referred to as equity kickers. These equity kickers have the potential to generate additional revenues to us as a result of excess cash flow distributions and/or as appreciated properties are sold or refinanced.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Gain on sales, including fee-based services, net—Gain on sales, including fee-based services, net includes commitment fees, broker fees, loan assumption fees, loan origination fees and gains on sale of loans of our Agency Business. In some instances, the borrower pays an additional amount of interest at the time the loan is closed, an origination fee, net of any direct loan origination costs incurred, which is recognized upon the sale of the loan. Revenue recognition occurs when the related services are performed, unless significant contingencies exist, and for the sale of loans, when all the incidence of ownership passes to the buyer. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis as it is earned from loans held-for-sale.

Property operating income—Property operating income represents income associated with the operations of commercial real estate properties classified as real estate owned. We recognize revenue for these activities when the fees are fixed or determinable, or are evidenced by an arrangement, collection is reasonably assured and the services under the arrangement have been provided.

Other income, net—Other income, net represents loan structuring, modification, defeasance, and miscellaneous asset management fees associated with our loan and investment portfolio, as well as changes in the fair value of certain derivatives. We recognize these forms of income when the fees are fixed or determinable, are evidenced by an arrangement, collection is reasonably assured and the services under the arrangement have been provided.

Stock-Based Compensation. We have granted stock awards to certain of our employees and directors, as well as non-employees, consisting of shares of our common stock that vest immediately or annually over a multi-year period, subject to the recipient's continued service to us. We record stock-based compensation expense at the grant date fair value of the related stock-based award at the grant date (for the portion that vests immediately) or ratably over the respective vesting periods. Dividends are paid on restricted stock as dividends are paid on shares of our common stock whether or not they are vested. Stock-based compensation is disclosed in our consolidated statements of income under "employee compensation and benefits" for employees and under "selling and administrative" expense for non-employees.

Income Taxes. We organize and conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT and to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code with respect thereto. A REIT is generally not subject to federal income tax on its REIT-taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes at least 90% of its REIT-taxable income and meets certain other requirements. Certain REIT income may be subject to state and local income taxes.

The Agency Business mainly operates through a TRS, which is a part of our TRS Consolidated Group and is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. In general, our TRS entities may hold assets that the REIT cannot hold directly and may engage in real estate or non-real estate-related business. Current and deferred taxes are recorded on the portion of earnings (losses) recognized by us with respect to our interest in TRSs. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are calculated based on temporary differences between our GAAP consolidated financial statements and the federal, state, local tax basis of assets and liabilities as of the consolidated balance sheets. We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets (e.g., net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards) and recognize a valuation allowance if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. When evaluating the realizability of our deferred tax

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

assets, we consider estimates of expected future taxable income, existing and projected book/tax differences, tax planning strategies available and the general and industry specific economic outlook.

We periodically evaluate tax positions to determine whether it is more likely than not that such positions would be sustained upon examination by a tax authority for all open tax years, as defined by the statute of limitations, based on their technical merits. We report interest and penalties related to tax uncertainties as a component of the income tax provision.

Earnings Per Share. We present both basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS"). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower EPS amount.

Description	Effective Date	Effect on Financial Statements


In October 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-17, Consolidation: Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control. This ASU alters how a decision maker needs to consider indirect interests in a VIE held through an entity under common control and requires consideration of only an entity's proportionate indirect interest in a VIE held through a common control party.	First quarter of 2017.	The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows.	First quarter of 2017.	The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. This ASU, among other things, eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods the investment was held.	First quarter of 2017.	The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Description	Effective Date	Effect on Financial Statements


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This ASU eliminates step two from the goodwill impairment test, which measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value with the carrying amount of goodwill.	First quarter of 2020 with early adoption permitted beginning in the first quarter of 2017.	We are evaluating the timing of our adoption and the impact this guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements.


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This ASU provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities constitutes a business. It also provides more consistency in applying the guidance, reduces the costs of application and makes the definition of a business more operable.	First quarter of 2018.	We have evaluated ASU 2017-01 and determined that adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements in the period of adoption. The potential impact of ASU 2017-01 will be assessed for future acquisitions.


In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash. This ASU requires restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.	First quarter of 2018 with early adoption permitted.	We have evaluated ASU 2016-18 and determined that adoption of this standard will not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.


In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This ASU was issued to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory.	First quarter of 2018 with early adoption permitted and should be applied on a modified retrospective basis.	We have evaluated ASU 2016-16 and determined that adoption of this standard will not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.


In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU provides eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows.	First quarter of 2018 and requires adoption on a retrospective basis.	We have evaluated ASU 2016-15 and determined that adoption of this standard will not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Description	Effective Date	Effect on Financial Statements


In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Entities will be required to use forward-looking information to better form their credit loss estimates. This ASU also requires enhanced disclosures to help financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses.	First quarter of 2020 with early adoption permitted beginning in the first quarter of 2019.	We are evaluating the timing of our adoption and the impact this guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases: Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This ASU requires recognition of balance sheet assets and liabilities for leases with terms of more than 12 months and disclosure of key information about an entity's leasing arrangements.	First quarter of 2019 with early adoption permitted and a modified retrospective approach is required.	We are evaluating the timing of our adoption and the impact this guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements.


In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This ASU requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. This ASU also eliminates the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost.	First quarter of 2018.	We have evaluated ASU 2016-01 and do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Description	Effective Date	Effect on Financial Statements


Since 2014, the FASB has issued several amendments to its guidance on revenue recognition. The amended guidance, among other things, introduces a new framework for a single comprehensive model that can be used when accounting for revenue and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including that which pertains to specific industries. The core principle states that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for such goods and services. It also requires expanded quantitative and qualitative disclosures that will enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Most revenue associated with financial instruments, including interest and loan origination fees, along with gains and losses on investment securities, derivatives and sales of financial instruments are excluded from the scope of the guidance.	First quarter of 2018 and permits the use of either the full retrospective or modified retrospective method.	We have evaluated the new standard and determined that substantially all of our revenue, including interest income, loan origination fees, servicing income and gains on sales of loans and investment securities, are not impacted. This standard will not materially impact the timing of gains on certain sales of real estate and will not materially impact our total revenues or footnote disclosures. We will adopt this standard in the first quarter of 2018 using the modified retrospective method.

On July 14, 2016, we completed the Acquisition of the agency platform of our Former Manager pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated February 25, 2016. The aggregate purchase price was $275.8 million, which was paid with $138.0 million in stock, $87.8 million in cash and with the issuance of a $50.0 million seller financing instrument. The equity component of the purchase price was paid with 21,230,769 operating partnership units ("OP Units"), which was based on a stock price of $6.50 per share. The closing price of our common stock on the Acquisition date was $7.29 per share; therefore, the estimated fair value of the total consideration was $292.5 million. See Note 12—Debt Obligations for details about the seller financing and Note 18—Equity for details about the OP Units.

We finalized the purchase price allocation during the first quarter of 2017 based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the Acquisition date. See Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies for details of an adjustment made to the purchase price allocation in the third quarter of 2017.

In connection with the Acquisition, we had the option to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement with our Former Manager for $25.0 million. On May 31, 2017, we exercised that option and fully internalized our management team, which included approximately 100 employees. We incurred expenses of less than $0.1 million in connection with this transaction. We accounted for this transaction as a business combination with the settlement of a preexisting relationship. The total purchase price of $25.0 million was assigned to goodwill since the asset transferred represented an assembled workforce. Goodwill was allocated $12.5 million each to our two reporting segments and is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Accounting guidance requires the settlement of preexisting relationships to be accounted for separately from the business combination, with the recognition of any corresponding gain or loss through the statement of income upon settlement. Any potential gain or loss is measured based on the favorable or unfavorable terms of the management agreement from the prospective of the acquirer, when compared to current market rates for similar services. Based on this guidance, with the assistance of a specialist, we performed an analysis and determined that the terminated management agreement contained terms similar to those of arrangements with comparable companies, and therefore no such gain or loss was recorded.

The following tables set forth the composition of our Structured Business loan and investment portfolio ($ in thousands):

During 2015, we acquired a $116.0 million defaulted first mortgage note, at par, that paid off resulting in the recognition of income totaling $6.7 million, net of fees and expenses. The $6.7 million

of income consisted of other interest income totaling $7.9 million, partially offset by $1.2 million of expenses that were recorded in employee compensation and benefits. In 2016, additional funds held in escrow from the note payoff were released following an arbitration proceeding and we recognized income totaling $1.9 million, net of fees and expenses. The $1.9 million of income consisted of other interest income totaling $2.5 million, partially offset by $0.6 million of expenses that were recorded in employee compensation and benefits.

We are subject to concentration of credit risk in that, at December 31, 2017, the UPB related to 42 loans with five different borrowers represented 24% of total assets. At December 31, 2016, the UPB related to 35 loans with five different borrowers represented 16% of total assets. During both 2017 and 2016, no single loan or investment represented 10% of our total assets and no single investor group generated 10% of our revenue.

Effective January 1, 2017, we revised our methodology used to assign a credit risk rating to each loan and investment to be consistent with the method used by our Agency Business. We now assign ratings of pass, pass/watch, special mention, substandard or doubtful to each loan and investment, instead of a one to five rating. Similar to our previous methodology, there are five ratings, each generally consistent with our prior ratings (i.e., pass is equivalent to a one rating, pass/watch is equivalent to a two rating, etc.), with a pass rating being the lowest risk and a doubtful rating being the highest.

The benchmark guidelines and other factors used in our revised methodology are substantially the same as our previous methodology. Each credit risk rating has benchmark guidelines that pertain to debt-service coverage ratios, LTV ratios, borrower strength, asset quality, and funded cash reserves. Other factors such as guarantees, market strength, and remaining loan term and borrower equity are also reviewed and factored into determining the credit risk rating assigned to each loan. This metric provides a helpful snapshot of portfolio quality and credit risk. Given our asset management approach, however, the risk rating process does not result in differing levels of diligence contingent upon credit rating. That is because all portfolio assets are subject to the level of scrutiny and ongoing analysis consistent with that of a "high-risk" loan. Assets are subject to, at minimum, a thorough quarterly financial evaluation in which historical operating performance and forward-looking projections are reviewed.

Generally speaking, given our typical loan profile, risk ratings of pass, pass/watch and special mention suggest that we expect the loan to make both principal and interest payments according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, and is not considered impaired. A risk rating of substandard indicates we anticipate the loan may require a modification of some kind. A risk rating of doubtful indicates we expect the loan to underperform over its term, and there could be loss of interest and/or principal. Further, while the above are the primary guidelines used in determining a certain risk rating, subjective items such as borrower strength, market strength or asset quality may result in a rating that is higher or lower than might be indicated by any risk rating matrix.

As a result of the loan review process, at December 31, 2017 and 2016, we identified eight loans and investments that we consider higher-risk loans that had a carrying value, before loan loss reserves,

of $126.5 million and $152.9 million, respectively, and a weighted average last dollar LTV ratio of 93% and 94%, respectively.

A summary of the loan portfolio's weighted average internal risk ratings and LTV ratios by asset class is as follows ($ in thousands):

As of December 31, 2017, 23%, 21% and 11% of the outstanding balance of our loan and investment portfolio had underlying properties in Texas, New York and California, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, 25%, 15%, 14% and 13% of the outstanding balance of our loan and investment portfolio had underlying properties in New York, California, Florida and Texas, respectively.

We evaluate each loan in our portfolio quarterly to assess the performance of our loans and whether a reserve for impairment should be recorded. We measure our relative loss position for our mezzanine loans, junior participation loans and preferred equity investments by determining the point where we will be exposed to losses based on our position in the capital stack as compared to the fair

value of the underlying collateral. We determine our loss position on both a first dollar LTV and a last dollar LTV basis, as defined above.

A summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses is as follows (in thousands):

At December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we had a total of five, eight and nine loans, respectively, with an aggregate carrying value, before loan loss reserves, of $163.5 million, $187.4 million and $189.2 million, respectively, for which impairment reserves have been recorded.

A summary of charge-offs and recoveries by asset class is as follows ($ in thousands):

There were no loans for which the collateral securing the loan was less than the carrying value of the loan for which we had not recorded a provision for loan loss as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

During 2017, we incurred a $20.5 million charge-off due to the write-off of a fully reserved junior participation loan and we determined that the fair value of the underlying collateral securing a preferred equity investment with an aggregate carrying value of $34.8 million was less than the net carrying value of the investment, which resulted in a $2.0 million provision for loan losses. In addition,

a fully reserved mezzanine loan with a UPB of $1.8 million paid off in full, which resulted in a $1.8 million reserve recovery, and we recorded a reserve recovery of $0.7 million on a multifamily bridge loan.

During 2016, we received a $1.8 million discounted payoff on an impaired bridge loan with a carrying value before reserves of $4.8 million, resulting in the recognition of an additional provision for loan losses of $0.1 million and a charge-off of $3.0 million.

During 2015, we incurred a $32.0 million charge-off of previously recorded reserves due to the write-off of a fully reserved junior participation loan and we charged-off $2.5 million in connection with the transfer of an office building by deed in lieu of foreclosure to real estate owned, net. We also determined that the fair value of the underlying collateral securing five impaired loans with an aggregate carrying value of $125.3 million was less than the net carrying value of the loans, resulting in a $6.5 million provision for loan losses, and we recorded $2.0 million of net recoveries of previously recorded loan loss reserves which resulted in a $4.5 million net provision. These recoveries were recorded in provision for loan losses in the consolidated statements of income. Of the $6.5 million of loan loss reserves recorded during 2015, $4.0 million was attributable to loans on which we had previously recorded reserves, while $2.5 million of reserves related to other loans in our portfolio.

We have six loans with a carrying value totaling $120.0 million at December 31, 2017 that are collateralized by a land development project. These loans were scheduled to mature in September 2017 and were extended to September 2018. The loans do not carry a current pay rate of interest, but five of the loans with a carrying value totaling $110.7 million entitle us to a weighted average accrual rate of interest of 8.66%. In 2008, we suspended the recording of the accrual rate of interest on these loans, as they were impaired and we deemed the collection of this interest to be doubtful. At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, we have cumulative allowances for loan losses of $49.1 million related to these loans. The loans are subject to certain risks associated with a development project including, but not limited to, availability of construction financing, increases in projected construction costs, demand for the development's outputs upon completion of the project, and litigation risk. Additionally, these loans were not classified as non-performing as the borrower is in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of the loans.

At December 31, 2017, two loans with an aggregate net carrying value of $29.1 million, net of related loan loss reserves of $7.4 million, were classified as non-performing. As of December 31, 2016, three fully reserved loans with an aggregate carrying value of $22.9 million were classified as non-performing. Income from non-performing loans is generally recognized on a cash basis when it is received. Full income recognition will resume when the loan becomes contractually current and performance has recommenced.

A summary of our non-performing loans by asset class is as follows (in thousands):

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had no loans contractually past due 90 days or more that are still accruing interest.

A summary of loan modifications, refinancings and/or extensions by asset class that we considered to be troubled debt restructurings were as follows ($ in thousands):

The loan modified during 2017 was considered a troubled debt restructuring as a result of a forbearance agreement entered into with the borrower in 2017 and was classified as non-performing as of December 31, 2017. There were no other loans in which we considered the modifications to be troubled debt restructurings that were subsequently considered non-performing as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and no additional loans were considered to be impaired due to our troubled debt restructuring analysis for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. These loans were modified to increase the likelihood of a total recovery of the combined principal and interest from the loan.

Given the transitional nature of some of our real estate loans, we may require funds to be placed into an interest reserve, based on contractual requirements, to cover debt service costs. As of December 31, 2017, we had total interest reserves of $52.5 million on 81 loans with an aggregate UPB of $1.57 billion. As of December 31, 2016, we had total interest reserves of $20.4 million on 75 loans with an aggregate UPB of $1.01 billion.

Our loans held-for-sale, net are typically sold within 60 days of loan origination and the gain on sales are included in gain on sales, including fee-based services, net in the consolidated statements of income. During 2017, we sold $4.81 billion of loans held-for-sale and recorded gain on sales of $68.3 million. During 2016, we sold $1.49 billion of loans held-for-sale, excluding $418.2 million of sales related to loans that were acquired as part of the Acquisition, and recorded gain on sales of $22.8 million. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no loans held-for-sale that were 90 days or more past due, and there were no loans held-for-sale that were placed on a non-accrual status.

Our capitalized MSRs reflect commercial real estate MSRs derived from loans sold in our Agency Business, or MSRs acquired as part of the Acquisition or in the open market from third parties. The weighted average estimated life remaining of our MSRs held at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 7.2 years and 6.9 years, respectively.

We recorded write-offs relating to specific MSRs of $15.8 million and $5.8 million during 2017 and 2016, respectively, primarily due to prepayments of loans. We collected prepayment fees of $12.7 million and $5.6 million during 2017 and 2016, respectively, which are included as a component of servicing revenue, net on the consolidated statements of income. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had no valuation allowance recorded on any of our MSRs.

The expected amortization of the capitalized MSRs recorded as of December 31, 2017 are shown in the table below. Actual amortization may vary from these estimates (in thousands).

An analysis of the product and geographic concentrations that impact our servicing revenue is as follows ($ in thousands):

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, our weighted average servicing fee was 47.7 basis points and 47.8 basis points, respectively. We held cash in escrow for these loans totaling $477.9 million and $401.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which is not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. These escrows are maintained in separate accounts at several federally insured depository institutions, which may exceed FDIC insured limits. We earn interest income on these escrow deposits, generally based on a market rate of interest negotiated with the financial institutions that hold the escrow deposits. Escrow earnings reflect interest income net of interest paid to the borrower, if required, and is a component of servicing revenue, net in the consolidated statements of income.

Freddie Mac may choose to hold, sell or securitize loans we sell to them under the Freddie Mac SBL program. As part of the securitizations under the SBL program, we are required to purchase the bottom tranche bond, generally referred to as the "B Piece," that represents the bottom 10%, or highest risk of the securitization. During 2017, we retained 49%, or $41.0 million initial face value of three B Piece bonds, at a discount, for $27.2 million and sold the remaining 51% to the third party at par. Prior to 2017, a third party investor agreed to purchase the entire B Piece of each SBL program securitization at par. These held-to-maturity securities are carried at cost, net of unamortized discounts and are collateralized by a pool of multifamily mortgage loans, bear interest at an initial weighted average variable rate of 3.65% and have an estimated weighted average maturity of 5.9 years. The weighted average effective interest rate was 12.97% at December 31, 2017, including the accretion of discount. Approximately $5.4 million is estimated to mature within one year, $17.9 million is estimated to mature after one year through five years, $10.8 million is estimated to mature after five years through ten years and $6.5 million is estimated to mature after ten years.

The following is a summary of the held-to-maturity securities we held at December 31, 2017 (in thousands):

We account for all investments in equity affiliates under the equity method. The following is a summary of our investments in equity affiliates (in thousands):

Arbor Residential Investor LLC ("ARI"). In 2015, we invested $9.6 million for 50% of our Former Manager's indirect interest in a joint venture with a third party that was formed to invest in a residential mortgage banking business. As a result of this transaction, we had an initial indirect interest of 22.5% in the mortgage banking business, which was subject to dilution upon attaining certain profit hurdles of the business, and at December 31, 2017, our indirect interest was 16.3%. In 2017, we recorded a $5.5 million charge for our proportionate share of a litigation settlement that will be paid over a two-year period and a loss of $1.8 million to (loss) income from equity affiliates in the consolidated statements of income related to this investment. During 2016 and 2015, we recorded income of $9.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively.

In 2015, we invested $1.7 million through ARI for a 50% non-controlling interest in a joint venture that invests in non-qualified residential mortgages purchased from the mortgage banking business's origination platform. We also funded $0.6 million, $5.9 million and $7.9 million of additional mortgage purchases during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During 2017 and 2016, we received cash distributions totaling $3.2 million and $13.0 million as a result of the joint venture selling most of its mortgage assets, which were classified as returns of capital. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recorded income of $0.1 million, $0.5 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively, to (loss) income from equity affiliates in our consolidated statements of income related to this investment.

West Shore Café. We own a 50% noncontrolling interest in the West Shore Lake Café, a restaurant/inn lakefront property in Lake Tahoe, California. We provided a $1.7 million first mortgage loan to an affiliated entity to acquire property adjacent to the original property, which matures in May 2018, with a one-year extension option, and bears interest at LIBOR plus 4.0%. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recorded income of $0.1 million in each year to (loss) income from equity affiliates in our consolidated statements of income related to this investment.

Lightstone Value Plus REIT L.P. / JT Prime. We own a $1.9 million interest in an unconsolidated joint venture that holds common operating partnership units of Lightstone Value Plus REIT L.P. ("Lightstone"). We also own a 50% non-controlling interest in an unconsolidated joint venture,

JT Prime, which holds common operating partnership units of Lightstone at a carrying value of $0.4 million. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recorded income of $0.2 million in each year to (loss) income from equity affiliates in our consolidated statements of income related to these investments.

East River Portfolio. We invested $0.1 million for a 5% interest in a joint venture that owns two multifamily properties. The joint venture is comprised of a consortium of investors consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, and other related parties, who together own an interest of 95%. We originated a $1.7 million bridge loan to the joint venture with an interest rate of 5.5% over LIBOR that was repaid in full during 2017. In connection with the debt repayment, we received a $0.1 million distribution bringing our basis in this investment to zero. See Note 20—Agreements and Transactions with Related Parties for details.

Lexford Portfolio. We own a $44,000 noncontrolling equity interest in Lexford, a portfolio of multifamily assets. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, we received distributions from this equity investment and recognized income totaling $2.5 million, $2.8 million and $4.5 million, net of expenses, respectively. The $4.5 million of income received in 2015 was comprised of income of $5.5 million, partially offset by $1.0 million of expenses related to these distributions that were recorded in employee compensation and benefits. See Note 20—Agreements and Transactions with Related Parties for details.

Issuers of Junior Subordinated Notes. We invested $0.6 million for 100% of the common shares of two affiliated entities of ours. These entities pay dividends on both the common and preferred securities on a quarterly basis at variable rates based on LIBOR. During 2017, we purchased, at a discount, a portion of our junior subordinated notes. In connection with this extinguishment of debt, we settled our investment in these affiliated entities. See Note 12—Debt Obligations for details.

Equity Participation Interest. During 2017, we received $1.5 million from the redemption of a 25% equity participation interest we held in a multifamily property, which is included in (loss) income from equity affiliates in our consolidated statements of income. Prior to this transaction, our basis in this investment was zero.

The condensed combined balance sheets for our unconsolidated investments in equity affiliates are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,

	2017							2016
Condensed Combined Balance Sheets	ARI		Other			Total		ARI		Other			Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26,419	$	36,304		$	62,723	$	21,257	$	33,342		$	54,599
Real estate assets		303,098		584,580			887,678		360,412		601,713			962,125
Other assets		137,782		54,537			192,319		125,941		45,022			170,963

Total assets		467,299		675,421			1,142,720		507,610		680,077			1,187,687



Liabilities:
Notes payable		357,410		702,495			1,059,905		380,468		703,752			1,084,220
Other liabilities		34,964		15,885			50,849		13,329		16,390			29,719

Total liabilities		392,374		718,380			1,110,754		393,797		720,142			1,113,939

Stockholders' equity Arbor(1)		19,193		4,460			23,653		28,917		4,454			33,371
Stockholders' equity		55,732		(47,419	)		8,313		84,896		(44,519	)		40,377

Total stockholders' equity		74,925		(42,959	)		31,966		113,813		(40,065	)		73,748

Total liabilities and equity	$	467,299	$	675,421		$	1,142,720	$	507,610	$	680,077		$	1,187,687

The condensed combined statements of operations for our unconsolidated investments in equity affiliates are as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017									2016							2015
Statements of Operations:	ARI			Other			Total			ARI		Other			Total		ARI		Other		Total
Revenue:
Rental income	$	—		$	103,873		$	103,873		$	—	$	99,417		$	99,417	$	—	$	95,938	$	95,938
Interest income		9,248			259			9,507			11,726		259			11,985		9,957		259		10,216
Operating income		143,743			—			143,743			195,905		—			195,905		129,567		1,364		130,931
Reimbursement income		—			7,378			7,378			—		7,085			7,085		—		6,801		6,801
Other income		2,909			8,420			11,329			213		8,060			8,273		196		15,124		15,320

Total revenues		155,900			119,930			275,830			207,844		114,821			322,665		139,720		119,486		259,206

Expenses:
Operating expenses		154,837			58,289			213,126			142,297		56,679			198,976		101,165		56,608		157,773
Interest expense		11,436			32,918			44,354			13,331		32,687			46,018		9,824		33,943		43,767
Depreciation and amortization		1,384			29,155			30,539			1,127		29,249			30,376		752		21,011		21,763
Other expenses		22,000			471			22,471			—		91			91		—		1,628		1,628

Total expenses		189,657			120,833			310,490			156,755		118,706			275,461		111,741		113,190		224,931

Net (loss) income	$	(33,757	)	$	(903	)	$	(34,660	)	$	51,089	$	(3,885	)	$	47,204	$	27,979	$	6,296	$	34,275



Arbor's share of (loss) income(1)	$	(7,247	)	$	2,796		$	(4,451	)	$	9,950	$	3,045		$	12,995	$	6,600	$	5,701	$	12,301

Our real estate assets at both December 31, 2017 and 2016 were comprised of a hotel property and an office building.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, our hotel property had a weighted average occupancy rate of approximately 52%, 54% and 53%, respectively, a weighted average daily rate of approximately $108, $100 and $90, respectively, and a weighted average revenue per available room of approximately $56, $54 and $48, respectively. The operation of a hotel property is seasonal with the majority of revenues earned in the first two quarters of the calendar year. During 2016, through site visits and discussion with market participants, we determined that the hotel property exhibited indicators of impairment and performed an impairment analysis. As a result of this impairment analysis, we recorded an impairment loss of $11.2 million. During 2017, we had additional discussions with market participants and received additional market analyses related to this property, which resulted in a further impairment totaling $2.7 million. In addition, during 2017, through site visits and discussion with market participants, we determined that the office building exhibited indicators of impairment and performed an impairment analysis. As a result of this impairment analysis, we recorded an impairment loss of $0.5 million.

Our office building was fully occupied by a single tenant until April 2017 when the lease expired. The building is currently vacant.

Our real estate assets had restricted cash balances totaling $0.7 million at both December 31, 2017 and 2016, due to escrow requirements.

In 2016, we sold our three remaining multifamily properties and a hotel property for a total of $50.7 million and recognized a gain of $11.6 million. A portion of the sales proceeds were used to payoff the outstanding debt on the multifamily properties of $27.1 million.

In 2015, we sold three hotel properties and a multifamily property classified as held-for-sale for a total of $41.1 million and recognized a gain of $7.8 million.

The results of operations for properties classified as held-for-sale are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Goodwill. The following table sets forth the goodwill activity (in thousands):

Other Intangible Assets. The following table sets forth the other intangible assets activity (in thousands):

The amortization expense recorded for these intangible assets were $5.6 million and $2.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

At December 31, 2017, the weighted average remaining lives of our amortizable finite-lived intangible assets and the estimated amortization expense for each of the succeeding five years are as follows ($ in thousands):

We utilize various forms of short-term and long-term financing agreements to finance certain of our loans and investments, as well as other general business needs. Borrowings underlying these arrangements are primarily secured by a significant amount of our loans and investments and substantially all of our loans held-for-sale.

The following table outlines borrowings under our credit facilities and repurchase agreements ($ in thousands):

	December 31, 2017									December 31, 2016

	UPB(1)		Debt Carrying Value(1)		Collateral Carrying Value		Wtd. Avg. Note Rate			UPB(1)		Debt Carrying Value(1)		Collateral Carrying Value		Wtd. Avg. Note Rate
*Structured Business*
$225 million repurchase facility	$	103,818	$	102,350	$	145,850		3.90	%	$	107,303	$	106,051	$	183,828		3.12	%
$100 million repurchase facility		2,835		2,445		6,600		3.61	%		21,897		21,598		34,850		2.96	%
$75 million credit facility		—		—		—		—			38,990		38,704		63,158		2.94	%
$75 million credit facility		9,000		8,999		16,000		3.61	%		23,286		23,277		31,725		2.81	%
$50 million credit facility		32,560		32,538		40,700		3.61	%		46,400		46,374		58,000		2.81	%
$50 million credit facility		3,700		3,581		4,625		4.88	%		7,956		7,956		9,885		4.08	%
$25.5 million credit facility		14,065		13,920		18,753		4.12	%		—		—		—		—
$10 million working capital line of credit		10,000		10,000		—		4.12	%		—		—		—		—
$7.5 million credit facility		7,472		7,432		9,340		4.37	%		—		—		—		—
Repurchase facility—securities(2)		53,938		53,938		—		4.45	%		—		—		—		—
$3 million master security agreement		1,834		1,834		—		3.21	%		2,533		2,533		—		3.21	%

Structured Business Total	$	239,222	$	237,037	$	241,868		4.02	%	$	248,365	$	246,493	$	381,446		3.02	%

*Agency Business*
$500 million multifamily ASAP agreement	$	121,880	$	121,880	$	121,880		2.61	%	$	142,557	$	142,557	$	142,557		1.65	%
$150 million credit facility		21,821		21,802		21,821		2.96	%		268,572		268,530		268,572		2.05	%
$150 million credit facility		99,357		99,242		99,357		2.91	%		210,139		210,009		210,139		2.05	%
$100 million credit facility		23,785		23,785		23,785		2.86	%		39,047		39,048		39,047		1.95	%
$100 million repurchase facility		24,873		24,827		24,873		2.91	%		—		—		—		—

Agency Business Total	$	291,716	$	291,536	$	291,716		2.78	%	$	660,315	$	660,144	$	660,315		1.96	%

Consolidated total	$	530,938	$	528,573	$	533,584		3.34	%	$	908,680	$	906,637	$	1,041,761		2.25	%

Structured Business. We utilize credit facilities and repurchase agreements with various financial institutions to finance our Structured Business loans and investments as described below.

Including certain fees and costs, such as structuring, commitment, non-use and warehousing fees, the weighted average interest rate for the credit facilities and repurchase agreements of our Structured

Business was 4.51% and 3.42% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The leverage on our loans and investment portfolio, excluding the securities repurchase facility, $10.0 million working capital line of credit and the $3.0 million master security agreement used to finance leasehold improvements to our corporate office, was 72% and 64% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In the fourth quarter of 2017, we amended our $150.0 million repurchase facility increasing the commitment by $75.0 million to $225.0 million. This facility bears interest at a rate of 225 basis points over LIBOR on senior mortgage loans, 350 basis points over LIBOR on junior mortgage loans and matures in October 2018, with a one-year extension option. If the estimated market value of the loans financed in this facility decrease, we may be required to pay down borrowings under this facility.

We have a $100.0 million repurchase facility to finance multifamily bridge loans that bears interest at a rate of 200 basis points over LIBOR, matures in June 2019 and has a maximum advance rate of 75%.

We have a $75.0 million credit facility to finance multifamily bridge loans which matures in December 2018 and bears interest at a rate ranging from 200 basis points to 212.5 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the advance rate. This facility includes a $25.0 million sublimit to finance healthcare related loans at an interest rate ranging from 212.5 basis points to 250 basis points over LIBOR depending on the type of healthcare facility financed and the advance rate. In the fourth quarter of 2017, we extended the maturity date of this facility to December 2018. The facility has a maximum advance rate of 75% on multifamily bridge loans and 65% on healthcare related loans.

We have another $75.0 million credit facility to finance bridge loans that bears interest at a rate of 200 basis points over LIBOR and matures in June 2018. The facility has a maximum advance rate of 70% to 75%, depending on the property type.

We have a $50.0 million credit facility to finance multifamily loans that bears interest at a rate of 200 basis points over LIBOR and is scheduled to mature in February 2018. This facility includes a one year automatic extension option, subject to certain conditions, and has a maximum advance rate of 80%.

We have another $50.0 million credit facility that bears an interest rate ranging from 250 basis points to 325 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the type of healthcare facility financed, and matures in September 2019. The facility includes two one-year extension options and has a maximum advance rate of 80%.

In 2017, we entered into a $25.5 million credit facility to finance a multifamily bridge loan. The facility bears interest at a rate of 250 basis points over LIBOR and matures in October 2019.

In 2017, we entered into a $10.0 million unsecured working capital line of credit that bears interest at a rate of 250 basis points over LIBOR. This line is scheduled to mature in March 2018 and is renewable annually.

In the fourth quarter of 2017, we entered into a $7.5 million credit facility to finance a healthcare related bridge loan. The facility bears interest at a rate of 275 basis points over LIBOR and matures in August 2018.

In the fourth quarter of 2017, we entered into an uncommitted repurchase facility that is used to finance securities we retained in connection with our two latest CLOs and our purchases of the B Piece bonds from SBL program securitizations. The facility bears interest at a rate ranging from 250 basis points to 350 basis points over LIBOR and has no stated maturity date.

We have two notes payable under a master security agreement that was used to finance leasehold improvements to our corporate office, which were assumed as part of the Acquisition. The two notes bear interest at a weighted average fixed rate of 3.21%, require monthly amortization payments and mature in 2020.

Agency Business. We utilize credit facilities with various financial institutions to finance the loans held-for-sale on our Agency Business.

We have a $500.0 million Multifamily As Soon as Pooled ® Plus ("ASAP") agreement with Fannie Mae providing us with a warehousing credit facility for mortgage loans that are to be sold to Fannie Mae and serviced under the Fannie Mae DUS program. The ASAP agreement is not a committed line, has no expiration date and bears interest at a rate of 105 basis points over LIBOR (with a LIBOR Floor of 0.35%).

We have a $150.0 million credit facility that bears interest at a rate of 140 basis points over LIBOR and a scheduled maturity date in January 2018. In 2018, we amended the facility reducing the interest rate 10 basis points to 130 basis points over LIBOR and extending the maturity date one year. The financial institution that provided this credit facility has a security interest in the underlying mortgage notes that serve as collateral for this facility.

We have another $150.0 million credit facility that bears interest at a rate of 135 basis points over LIBOR and matures in July 2018. The financial institution that provided this credit facility has a security interest in the underlying mortgage notes that serve as collateral for this facility.

We have a $100.0 million credit facility that bears interest at a rate of 130 basis points over LIBOR and matures in June 2018. The committed amount under this facility was temporarily increased to $250.0 million through January 2018. The financial institution that provided this credit facility has a security interest in the underlying mortgage notes that serve as collateral for this facility.

In 2017, we entered into a $100.0 million repurchase facility that bears interest at a rate of 135 basis points over LIBOR and matures in August 2018. The financial institution that provided this credit facility has a security interest in the underlying mortgage notes that serve as collateral for this facility.

In 2017, we simultaneously terminated our then existing $30.0 million letter of credit facility and entered into a new $50.0 million letter of credit facility with a different financial institution. We issued letters of credit to secure obligations under the Fannie Mae DUS program and the Freddie Mac SBL program. The letter of credit facility bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.875%, matures in September 2020 and is primarily collateralized by our servicing revenue as approved by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The letter of credit facility includes a $5.0 million sublimit for an obligation under the Freddie Mac SBL program. At December 31, 2017, the letters of credit outstanding include $42.0 million for the Fannie Mae DUS program and $5.0 million for the Freddie Mac SBL program.

We account for our CLO transactions on our consolidated balance sheet as financing facilities. Our CLOs are VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary and are consolidated in our financial statements. The investment grade tranches are treated as secured financings, and are non-recourse to us.

The following table outlines borrowings and the corresponding collateral under our CLOs ($ in thousands):

In December 2017, we completed CLO IX, issuing five tranches of CLO notes through two newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiaries totaling $388.2 million. Of the total CLO notes issued, $356.4 million were investment grade notes issued to third party investors and $31.8 million were below investment grade notes retained by us. As of the CLO closing date, the notes were secured by a portfolio of loan obligations with a face value of $387.3 million, consisting primarily of bridge loans that were contributed from our existing loan portfolio. The financing has a stated maturity date in December

2027 and a three-year replacement period that allows the principal proceeds and sale proceeds (if any) of the loan obligations to be reinvested in qualifying replacement loan obligations, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the indenture. Thereafter, the outstanding debt balance will be reduced as loans are repaid. Initially, the proceeds of the issuance of the securities also included $92.7 million for the purpose of acquiring additional loan obligations for a period of up to 120 days from the CLO closing date. Subsequently, the issuer will own loan obligations with a face value of $480.0 million. We retained a residual interest in the portfolio with a notional amount of $123.6 million, including the $31.8 million below investment grade notes. The notes had an initial weighted average interest rate of 1.36% plus LIBOR and interest payments on the notes are payable monthly.

In September 2017, we completed the unwind of CLO IV, redeeming $219.0 million of our outstanding notes which were repaid primarily from the refinancing of the remaining assets within our existing financing facilities (including CLO VIII), as well as with cash held by CLO IV, and expensed $1.1 million of deferred financing fees into interest expense on the consolidated statements of income.

In August 2017, we completed CLO VIII, issuing six tranches of CLO notes through two newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiaries totaling $312.1 million. Of the total CLO notes issued, $282.9 million were investment grade notes issued to third party investors and $29.2 million were below investment grade notes retained by us. As of the CLO closing date, the notes were secured by a portfolio of loan obligations with a face value of $293.7 million, consisting primarily of bridge loans that were contributed from our existing loan portfolio. The financing has a stated maturity date in August 2027 and a three-year replacement period that allows the principal proceeds and sale proceeds (if any) of the loan obligations to be reinvested in qualifying replacement loan obligations, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the indenture. Thereafter, the outstanding debt balance will be reduced as loans are repaid. Initially, the proceeds of the issuance of the securities also included $71.3 million for the purpose of acquiring additional loan obligations for a period of up to 120 days from the CLO closing date, which we subsequently utilized resulting in the issuer owning loan obligations with a face value of $365.0 million. We retained a residual interest in the portfolio with a notional amount of $82.1 million, including the $29.2 million below investment grade notes. The notes had an initial weighted average interest rate of 1.31% plus LIBOR and interest payments on the notes are payable monthly.

In April 2017, we completed CLO VII, issuing to third party investors three tranches of investment grade CLOs through two newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiaries totaling $279.0 million. As of the CLO closing date, the notes were secured by a portfolio of loan obligations with a face value of $296.2 million, consisting primarily of bridge loans that were contributed from our existing loan portfolio. The financing has a stated maturity date in April 2027 and a three-year replacement period that allows the principal proceeds and sale proceeds (if any) of the loan obligations to be reinvested in qualifying replacement loan obligations, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the indenture. Thereafter, the outstanding debt balance will be reduced as loans are repaid. Initially, the proceeds of the issuance of the securities also included $63.8 million for the purpose of acquiring additional loan obligations for a period of up to 120 days from the CLO closing date, which were subsequently utilized resulting in the issuer owning loan obligations with a face value of $360.0 million. We retained a residual interest in the portfolio with a notional amount of $81.0 million. The notes had

an initial weighted average interest rate of 1.99% plus LIBOR and interest payments on the notes are payable monthly.

In December 2016, we completed the unwind of CLO III, redeeming $281.3 million of our outstanding notes which were repaid primarily from the refinancing of the remaining assets within our financing facilities, as well as with cash held by the CLO, and expensed $1.0 million of deferred fees into interest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

In August 2016, we completed CLO VI, issuing to third party investors three tranches of investment grade CLOs through two newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiaries totaling $250.3 million. As of the CLO closing date, the notes were secured by a portfolio of loan obligations with a face value of $275.4 million, consisting primarily of bridge loans that were contributed from our existing loan portfolio. The financing has a stated maturity date in September 2026 and a three year replacement period that allows the principal proceeds and sale proceeds (if any) of the loan obligations to be reinvested in qualifying replacement loan obligations, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the indenture. Thereafter, the outstanding debt balance will be reduced as loans are repaid. Initially, the proceeds of the issuance of the securities also included $49.6 million for the purpose of acquiring additional loan obligations for a period of up to 120 days from the closing date of the CLO, which were subsequently utilized resulting in the issuer owning loan obligations with a face value of $325.0 million. We retained a residual interest in the portfolio with a notional amount of $74.8 million. The notes had an initial weighted average interest rate of 2.48% plus LIBOR and interest payments on the notes are payable monthly.

In August 2015, we completed CLO V, issuing to third party investors three tranches of investment grade CLOs through two newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiaries totaling $267.8 million, of which we purchased $12.5 million of Class C notes that we subsequently sold at par for $12.5 million. As of the CLO closing date, the notes were secured by a portfolio of loan obligations with a face value of $302.6 million, consisting primarily of bridge loans that were contributed from our existing loan portfolio. The financing has a stated maturity date in September 2025 and a three year replacement period that allows the principal proceeds and sale proceeds (if any) of the loan obligations to be reinvested in qualifying replacement loan obligations, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the indenture. Thereafter, the outstanding debt balance will be reduced as loans are repaid. Initially, the proceeds of the issuance of the securities also included $47.4 million for the purpose of acquiring additional loan obligations for a period of up to 120 days from the closing date of the CLO, which were subsequently utilized resulting in the issuer owning loan obligations with a face value of $350.0 million. We retained a residual interest in the portfolio with a notional amount of $82.3 million. The notes had an initial weighted average interest rate of 2.44% plus LIBOR and interest payments on the notes are payable monthly.

In November 2017, we formed a $100.0 million Luxembourg commercial real estate debt fund and issued to third party investors $70.0 million of floating rate notes which bear an initial interest rate of 4.15% over LIBOR. The notes mature in 2025 and we retained a $30.0 million equity interest in the Debt Fund. The Debt Fund is secured by a portfolio of loan obligations with a face value of $100.0 million, which includes first mortgage bridge loans, senior participations interests in first

mortgage bridge loans, subordinate participation interest in first mortgage bridge loans and participation interests in mezzanine loans. The Debt Fund allows, for a period of three years, principal proceeds from portfolio assets to be reinvested in qualifying replacement assets, subject to certain conditions.

Borrowings and the corresponding collateral under our Debt Fund as of December 31, 2017 are as follows ($ in thousands):

The debt carrying value of our senior unsecured notes at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $95.3 million and $94.5 million, respectively, which were net of $2.6 million and $3.3 million, respectively, of deferred financing fees. The notes are due in 2021; however, they became eligible for redemption by us on May 16, 2017. Including certain fees and costs, the weighted average note rate was 8.16% and 8.15% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In November 2017, we issued $143.8 million aggregate principal amount of 5.375% convertible senior unsecured notes, which included the underwriter's exercise of the over-allotment option of $18.8 million. The notes pay interest semiannually in arrears. We received total proceeds of $139.2 million from the offering, net of deferred financing fees, which is being amortized through interest expense over the life of the notes. The notes mature in November 2020, unless earlier converted or repurchased by the holders pursuant to their terms. The initial conversion rate was 107.7122 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes and represents a conversion price of $9.28 per share of common stock.

In October 2016, we issued $86.3 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% convertible senior unsecured notes, including the underwriter's over-allotment option of $11.3 million, and, in January

2017, we issued an additional $13.8 million, which brought the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the notes to $100.0 million. The additional issuance in January 2017 is fully fungible with, and ranks equally in right of payment with, the initial issuance. The notes pay interest semiannually in arrears. We received total proceeds of $95.8 million from the offerings, net of deferred financing fees, which are being amortized through interest expense over the life of the notes. The notes mature in October 2019, unless earlier converted or repurchased by the holders pursuant to their terms. The initial conversion rate was 119.3033 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes and represented a conversion price of $8.38 per share of common stock. At December 31, 2017, the notes had a conversion rate of 120.465 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which represented a conversion price of $8.30 per share of common stock.

Our convertible senior unsecured notes are not redeemable by us prior to their maturities and are convertible into, at our election, cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of both, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and during specified periods. The conversion rates are subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain specified events and the holders may require us to repurchase all or any portion of their notes for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if we undergo a fundamental change as specified in the agreements.

Accounting guidance requires that convertible debt instruments with cash settlement features, including partial cash settlement, account for the liability component and equity component (conversion feature) of the instrument separately. The initial value of the liability component reflects the present value of the discounted cash flows using the nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of the issuance. The debt discount represents the difference between the proceeds received from the issuance and the initial carrying value of the liability component, which is being accreted back to the notes principal amount through interest expense over the term of the notes, which was 2.41 years and 2.75 years at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, on a weighted average basis.

The UPB, unamortized discount and net carrying amount of the liability and equity components of the notes were as follows (in thousands):

During 2017, we incurred total interest expense on the notes of $10.1 million, of which $7.4 million, $1.6 million and $1.1 million related to the cash coupons, accretion of the deferred financing fees and of the debt discount, respectively. During 2016, we incurred total interest expense on the notes of $1.9 million, of which $1.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million related to the cash coupon, accretion of the deferred financing fees and of the debt discount, respectively. Including the amortization of the deferred financing fees and debt discount, our weighted average total cost of the notes is 7.96% per annum.

In 2017, we purchased, at a discount, $20.9 million of our junior subordinated notes with a carrying value of $19.8 million and recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $7.1 million. As a result, we settled our related equity investment and extinguished $21.5 million of notes. The carrying value of borrowings under our junior subordinated notes was $139.6 million and $157.9 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which is net of a deferred amount of $12.5 million and $14.9 million, respectively, (which is being amortized into interest expense over the life of the notes) and $2.2 million and $3.1 million, respectively, of deferred financing fees. These notes have maturities ranging from March 2034 through April 2037 and pay interest quarterly at a fixed or floating rate of interest based on LIBOR. The current weighted average note rate was 4.53% and 3.82% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Including certain fees and costs, the weighted average note rate was 4.63% and 3.94% at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In connection with the Acquisition, we entered into a $50.0 million preferred equity interest financing agreement with our Former Manager to finance a portion of the aggregate purchase price. The debt has a five year term with a preferred return of 7% through December 31, 2016, increasing by 1% per annum thereafter, with a maximum rate of 12%. In addition, after eighteen months, the principal balance due is scheduled to increase over time with $62.5 million due if the debt remained outstanding until the end of the five-year term. Interest expense associated with this financing is recorded using the effective yield method. At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, the outstanding principal balance was $50.0 million and, during 2017 and 2016, we recorded interest expense of $3.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively. In January 2018, we paid $50.0 million in full satisfaction of this debt.

In 2015, we completed the unwind of our remaining CDO vehicles and terminated the related basis and interest rate swaps, which resulted in a loss of $4.6 million.

Credit Facilities and Repurchase Agreements. The credit facilities and repurchase agreements contain various financial covenants, including, but not limited to, minimum liquidity requirements, minimum net worth requirements, as well as certain other debt service coverage ratios, debt to equity ratios and minimum servicing portfolio tests. We were in compliance with all financial covenants and restrictions at December 31, 2017.

CLOs. Our CLO vehicles contain interest coverage and asset overcollateralization covenants that must be met as of the waterfall distribution date in order for us to receive such payments. If we fail these covenants in any of our CLOs, all cash flows from the applicable CLO would be diverted to repay principal and interest on the outstanding CLO bonds and we would not receive any residual payments until that CLO regained compliance with such tests. Our CLOs were in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 2017, as well as on the most recent determination dates in February

2018. In the event of a breach of the CLO covenants that could not be cured in the near-term, we would be required to fund our non-CLO expenses, including employee costs, distributions required to maintain our REIT status, debt costs, and other expenses with (i) cash on hand, (ii) income from any CLO not in breach of a covenant test, (iii) income from real property and loan assets, (iv) sale of assets, or (v) accessing the equity or debt capital markets, if available. We have the right to cure covenant breaches which would resume normal residual payments to us by purchasing non-performing loans out of the CLOs. However, we may not have sufficient liquidity available to do so at such time.

A summary of our CLO compliance tests as of the most recent determination dates in February 2018 is as follows:

A summary of our CLO overcollateralization ratios as of the determination dates subsequent to each quarter is as follows:

The ratio will fluctuate based on the performance of the underlying assets, transfers of assets into the CLOs prior to the expiration of their respective replenishment dates, purchase or disposal of other investments, and loan payoffs. No payment due under the junior subordinated indentures may be paid if there is a default under any senior debt and the senior lender has sent notice to the trustee. The junior subordinated indentures are also cross-defaulted with each other.

A summary of our allowance for loss-sharing obligations related to the Fannie Mae DUS program is as follows (in thousands):

When we settle a loss under the DUS loss-sharing model, the net loss is charged-off against the previously recorded loss-sharing obligation. The settled loss is often net of any previously advanced principal and interest payments in accordance with the DUS program, which are reflected as reductions to the proceeds needed to settle losses. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had outstanding advances of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, which were netted against the allowance for loss-sharing obligations.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the maximum quantifiable liability associated with our guarantees under the Fannie Mae DUS agreement were $2.24 billion and $2.04 billion, respectively. The maximum quantifiable liability is not representative of the actual loss we would incur. We would be liable for this

amount only if all of the loans we service for Fannie Mae, for which we retain some risk of loss, were to default and all of the collateral underlying these loans was determined to be without value at the time of settlement.

Structured Business. During 2017, our remaining two qualifying LIBOR cap hedges, with a notional value of $55.6 million, and our remaining two qualifying interest rate swap cash flow hedges, with a notional value of $41.5 million, matured. We entered into the LIBOR cap hedges due to certain CLO agreement requirments and we entered into the interest rate swaps to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. As of December 31, 2017, the Structured Business did not have any derivative financial instruments. At December 31, 2016, the fair value of our LIBOR cap hedges and interest rate swaps was less than $0.1 million and $(0.2) million, respectively.

The following table presents the effect of our qualifying derivative financial instruments on the statements of income (in thousands):

At December 31, 2016, the cumulative amount of other comprehensive income related to net unrealized losses on derivatives designated as qualifying hedges were de minimis.

Agency Business. The following is a summary of our non-qualifying derivative financial instruments ($ in thousands):

We enter into contractual commitments to originate and sell mortgage loans at fixed prices with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrower "rate locks" a specified interest rate within time frames established by us. All potential borrowers are evaluated for creditworthiness prior to the extension of the commitment. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time of the rate lock by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to an investor. To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, we enter into a forward sale commitment with the investor simultaneous with the rate lock commitment with the borrower. The forward sale contract locks in an interest rate and price for the sale of the loan. The terms of the contract with the investor and the rate lock with the borrower are matched in substantially all respects, with the objective of eliminating interest rate risk to the extent practical. Sale commitments with the investors have an expiration date that is longer than our related commitments to the borrower to allow, among other things, for the closing of the loan and processing of paperwork to deliver the loan into the sale commitment.

These commitments meet the definition of a derivative and are recorded at fair value, including the effects of interest rate movements which are reflected as a component of other income, net in the consolidated statements of income. The estimated fair value of rate lock commitments also includes the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan which is recorded as income from MSRs in the consolidated statements of income. During 2017 and 2016, we recorded net losses of $1.4 million and net gains of $0.5 million, respectively, from changes in the fair value of these derivatives in other income, net and $76.8 million and $44.9 million, respectively, of income from MSRs. See Note 15—Fair Value for details.

Fair value estimates are dependent upon subjective assumptions and involve significant uncertainties resulting in variability in estimates with changes in assumptions. The following table summarizes the principal amounts, carrying values and the estimated fair values of our financial instruments (in thousands):

	December 31, 2017						December 31, 2016

	Principal / Notional Amount		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Principal / Notional Amount		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Loans and investments, net	$	2,652,538	$	2,579,127	$	2,652,520	$	1,790,160	$	1,695,732	$	1,749,130
Loans held-for-sale, net		292,249		297,443		302,883		675,494		673,367		683,833
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net		n/a		252,608		286,073		n/a		227,743		245,456
Securities held-to-maturity, net		40,566		27,837		28,439		—		—		—
Derivative financial instuments		77,984		684		684		550,118		5,615		5,615
Financial liabilities:
Credit and repurchase facilities	$	530,938	$	528,573	$	529,992	$	908,680	$	906,637	$	907,883
Collateralized loan obligations		1,436,274		1,418,422		1,436,871		737,000		728,441		728,643
Debt Fund		70,000		68,084		70,000		—		—		—
Senior unsecured notes		97,860		95,280		99,582		97,860		94,522		99,034
Convertible senior unsecured notes, net		243,750		231,287		254,335		86,250		80,660		86,586
Junior subordinated notes		154,336		139,590		94,215		175,858		157,859		105,650
Related party financing		50,000		50,000		49,682		50,000		50,000		55,120
Derivative financial instruments		291,421		1,306		1,306		522,651		2,451		2,451

Assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities are as follows:

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment and we evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value and the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.

Loans and investments, net. Fair values of loans and investments that are not impaired are estimated using Level 3 inputs based on direct capitalization rate and discounted cash flow methodologies using discount rates, which, in our opinion, best reflect current market interest rates that would be offered for loans with similar characteristics and credit quality. Fair values of impaired loans and investments are estimated using Level 3 inputs that require significant judgments, which include assumptions regarding discount rates, capitalization rates, creditworthiness of major tenants, occupancy rates, availability of financing, exit plan and other factors.

Loans held-for-sale, net. Consists of originated loans that are generally transferred or sold within 60 days of loan funding, and are valued using pricing models that incorporate observable inputs from current market assumptions or a hypothetical securitization model utilizing observable market data from recent securitization spreads and observable pricing of loans with similar characteristics (Level 2). Fair value includes the fair value allocated to the associated future MSRs and is calculated pursuant to the valuation techniques described below for capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net (Level 3).

Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net. Fair values are estimated using Level 3 inputs based on discounted future net cash flow methodology. The fair value of MSRs carried at amortized cost are estimated using a process that involves the use of independent third-party valuation experts, supported by commercially available discounted cash flow models and analysis of current market data. The key inputs used in estimating fair value include the contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment speed of the underlying loans, discount rate, annual per loan cost to service loans, delinquency rates, late charges and other economic factors.

Securities held-to-maturity, net. Fair values are approximated using Level 3 inputs based on current market quotes received from financial sources that trade such securities and are based on prevailing market data and, in some cases, are derived from third party proprietary models based on well recognized financial principles and reasonable estimates about relevant future market conditions.

Derivative financial instruments. The fair values of rate lock and forward sale commitments are estimated using valuation techniques, which include internally-developed models developed based on changes in the U.S. Treasury rate and other observable market data (Level 2). The fair value of rate lock commitments includes the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loans, see capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net above for details on the applicable valuation technique (Level 3). We also consider the impact of counterparty non-performance risk when measuring the fair value of these derivatives. Given the credit quality of our counterparties, the short duration of interest rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts, and our historical experience, the risk of nonperformance by our counterparties is not significant.

Credit facilities and repurchase agreements. Fair values for credit facilities and repurchase agreements of the Structured Business are estimated at Level 3 using discounted cash flow methodology, using discount rates, which, in our opinion, best reflect current market interest rates for financing with similar characteristics and credit quality. The majority of our credit facilities and repurchase agreement for the Agency Business bear interest at rates that are similar to those available in the market currently and the fair values are estimated using Level 2 inputs. For these facilities, the fair values approximate their carrying values.

Collateralized loan obligations, Debt Fund, junior subordinated notes and related party financing. Fair values are estimated at Level 3 based on broker quotations, representing the discounted expected future cash flows at a yield that reflects current market interest rates and credit spreads.

Senior unsecured notes. Fair values are estimated at Level 1 based on current market quotes received from active markets.

Convertible senior unsecured notes, net. Fair values are estimated at Level 2 based on current market quotes received from inactive markets.

We measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of these financial assets and liabilities were determined using the following input levels as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):

We measure certain financial and non-financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The fair values of these financial and non-financial assets were determined using the following input levels as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):

Loan impairment assessments. Loans held for investment are intended to be held to maturity and, accordingly, are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan origination costs and fees, loan purchase discounts, and net of the allowance for loan losses, when such loan or investment is deemed to be impaired. We consider a loan impaired when, based upon current information, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due for both principal and interest according to the contractual

terms of the loan agreement. We evaluate our loans to determine if the value of the underlying collateral securing the impaired loan is less than the net carrying value of the loan, which may result in an allowance and corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. These valuations require significant judgments, which include assumptions regarding capitalization and discount rates, revenue growth rates, creditworthiness of major tenants, occupancy rates, availability of financing, exit plan and other factors. The table above and below includes all impaired loans, regardless of the period in which the impairment was recognized.

Long-lived assets: We review our real estate owned assets when events or circumstances change, indicating that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In the evaluation of a real estate owned asset for impairment, many factors are considered, including estimated current and expected operating cash flows from the asset during the projected holding period, costs necessary to extend the life or improve the asset, expected capitalization rates, projected stabilized net operating income, selling costs, and the ability to hold and dispose of the asset in the ordinary course of business. We first compare the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to the carrying value of such asset. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value, we recognize impairment based on discounted cash flows.

Quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2017 were as follows ($ in thousands):

	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Significant Unobservable Inputs

Financial assets:
Impaired loans(1):
Land	$	70,928	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	15.00	%
				Capitalization rate	7.25	%
				Revenue growth rate	3.00	%
Hotel		29,050	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	9.00	%
				Capitalization rate	7.00	%
				Revenue growth rate	3.30	%
Office		788	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	11.00	%
				Capitalization rate	9.00	%
				Revenue growth rate	2.50	%
Derivative financial instruments:
Rate lock commitments		276	Discounted cash flows	W/A discount rate	8.25	%
Financial assets:
Long-lived assets:
Hotel		11,458	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	11.75	%
				Capitalization rate	9.75	%
				Revenue growth rate	3.50	%
				Hold period	3 years

The derivative financial instruments using Level 3 inputs are outstanding for short periods of time (generally less than 60 days). A roll-forward of Level 3 derivative instruments were as follows (in thousands):

The following table presents the components of fair value and other relevant information associated with our rate lock commitments, forward sales commitments and the estimated fair value of cash flows from servicing on loans held-for-sale (in thousands):

We measure certain assets and liabilities for which fair value is only disclosed. The fair value of these assets and liabilities was determined using the following input levels as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):

Agency Business Commitments. The Agency Business is subject to supervision by certain regulatory agencies. Among other things, these agencies require us to meet certain minimum net worth, operational liquidity and restricted liquidity collateral requirements, and compliance with reporting requirements. Our adjusted net worth and liquidity required by the agencies for all periods presented exceeded these requirements.

As of December 31, 2017, we were required to maintain at least $12.3 million of liquid assets in one of our subsidiaries to meet our operational liquidity requirements for Fannie Mae and we had operational liquidity in excess of this requirement.

We are generally required to share the risk of any losses associated with loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program and are required to secure this obligation by assigning restricted cash balances and/or a letter of credit to Fannie Mae. The amount of collateral required by Fannie Mae is a formulaic calculation at the loan level by a Fannie Mae assigned tier which considers the loan balance, risk level of the loan, age of the loan and level of risk-sharing. Fannie Mae requires restricted liquidity for Tier 2 loans of 75 basis points, 15 basis points for Tier 3 loans and 5 basis points for Tier 4 loans, which is funded over a 48-month period that begins upon delivery of the loan to Fannie Mae. A significant portion of our Fannie Mae DUS serviced loans for which we have risk sharing are Tier 2 loans. As of December 31, 2017, we met the restricted liquidity requirement with a $42.0 million letter of credit.

As of December 31, 2017, reserve requirements for the Fannie Mae DUS loan portfolio will require us to fund $27.7 million in additional restricted liquidity over the next 48 months, assuming no further principal paydowns, prepayments, or defaults within our at-risk portfolio. Fannie Mae periodically reassesses these collateral requirements and may make changes to these requirements in the future. We generate sufficient cash flow from our operations to meet these capital standards and do not expect any changes to have a material impact on our future operations; however, future changes to collateral requirements may adversely impact our available cash.

We are subject to various capital requirements in connection with seller/servicer agreements that we have entered into with secondary market investors. Failure to maintain minimum capital requirements could result in our inability to originate and service loans for the respective investor and, therefore, could have a direct material effect on our consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2017, we met all of Fannie Mae's quarterly capital requirements and our Fannie Mae adjusted net worth was in excess of the required net worth. We are also subject to capital requirements on an annual basis for Ginnie Mae or FHA and we believe we have met all requirements as of December 31, 2017.

As an approved designated seller/servicer under Freddie Mac's SBL program, we are required to post collateral to ensure that we are able to meet certain purchase and loss obligations required by this program. Under the SBL program, we are required to post collateral equal to $5.0 million, which we utilize letters of credit to fund. At December 31, 2017, we had an outstanding letter of credit of $5.0 million in satisfaction of our requirements under this program.

We enter into contractual commitments with borrowers providing rate lock commitments while simultaneously entering into forward sale commitments with investors. These commitments are outstanding for short periods of time (generally less than 60 days) and are described in Note 14—Derivative Financial Instruments and Note 15—Fair Value.

Debt Obligations and Operating Leases. As of December 31, 2017, the maturities of our debt obligations and the minimum annual operating lease payments under leases with a term in excess of one year, were as follows (in thousands):

Unfunded Commitments. In accordance with certain structured loans and investments, we have outstanding unfunded commitments of $68.6 million as of December 31, 2017 that we are obligated to fund as borrowers meet certain requirements. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to,

property renovations, building construction and conversions based on criteria met by the borrower in accordance with the loan agreements.

Litigation. We are currently neither subject to any material litigation nor, to the best of our knowledge, threatened by any material litigation other than the following:

In June 2011, three related lawsuits were filed by the Extended Stay Litigation Trust (the "Trust"), a post-bankruptcy litigation trust alleged to have standing to pursue claims that previously had been held by Extended Stay, Inc. and the Homestead Village L.L.C. family of companies (together "ESI") (formerly Chapter 11 debtors, together the "Debtors") that have emerged from bankruptcy. Two of the lawsuits were filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, and the third in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. There were 73 defendants in the three lawsuits, including 55 corporate and partnership entities and 18 individuals. A subsidiary of ours and certain other entities that are affiliates of ours are included as defendants. The New York State Court action has been removed to the Bankruptcy Court. Our affiliates filed a motion to dismiss the three lawsuits.

The lawsuits all allege, as a factual basis and background certain facts surrounding the June 2007 leveraged buyout of ESI from affiliates of Blackstone Capital. Our subsidiary, Arbor ESH II, LLC, had a $115.0 million investment in the Series A1 Preferred Units of a holding company of Extended Stay, Inc. The New York State Court action and one of the two federal court actions name as defendants, Arbor ESH II, LLC, ACM and ABT-ESI LLC, an entity in which we have a membership interest, among the broad group of defendants. These two actions were commenced by substantially identical complaints. The defendants are alleged in these complaints, among other things, to have breached fiduciary and contractual duties by causing or allowing the Debtors to pay illegal dividends or other improper distributions of value at a time when the Debtors were insolvent. These two complaints also allege that the defendants aided and abetted, induced, or participated in breaches of fiduciary duty, waste, and unjust enrichment ("Fiduciary Duty Claims") and name a director of ours, and a former general counsel of ACM, each of whom had served on the Board of Directors of ESI for a period of time. We are defending these two defendants and paying the costs of such defense. On the basis of the foregoing allegations, the Trust has asserted claims under a number of common law theories, seeking the return of assets transferred by the Debtors prior to the Debtors' bankruptcy filing.

In the third action, filed in Bankruptcy Court, the same plaintiff, the Trust, has named ACM and ABT-ESI LLC, together with a number of other defendants and asserts claims, including constructive and fraudulent conveyance claims under state and federal statutes, as well as a claim under the Federal Debt Collection Procedure Act.

In June 2013, the Trust filed a motion to amend the lawsuits, to, among other things, (i) consolidate the lawsuits into one lawsuit, (ii) remove 47 defendants, none of whom are related to us, from the lawsuits so that there are 26 remaining defendants, including 16 corporate and partnership entities and 10 individuals, and (iii) reduce the counts within the lawsuits from over 100 down to 17. The remaining counts in the amended complaint against our affiliates are principally state law claims for breach of fiduciary duties, waste, unlawful dividends and unjust enrichment, and claims under the Bankruptcy Code for avoidance and recovery actions, among others. The bankruptcy court granted the motion and the amended complaint has been filed. The amended complaint seeks approximately

$139.0 million in the aggregate, plus interest from the date of the alleged unlawful transfers, from director designees, portions of which are also sought from our affiliates as well as from unaffiliated defendants. We have moved to dismiss the referenced actions and intend to vigorously defend against the claims asserted therein. During a status conference held in March 2014, the Court heard oral argument on the motion to dismiss and adjourned the case pending a ruling. Subsequent to that hearing, a new judge was assigned to the case and, in November 2016, the new judge entered an order directing the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing new cases decided since the last round of briefing. Oral arguments regarding the motion to dismiss were heard at a hearing held in January 2017. The Court reserved decision at that hearing.

We have not made a loss accrual for this litigation because we believe that it is not probable that a loss has been incurred and an amount cannot be reasonably estimated.

Due to Borrowers. Due to borrowers represents borrowers' funds held by us to fund certain expenditures or to be released at our discretion upon the occurrence of certain pre-specified events, and to serve as additional collateral for borrowers' loans. While retained, these balances earn interest in accordance with the specific loan terms they are associated with.

Our involvement with VIEs primarily affects our financial performance and cash flows through amounts recorded in interest income, interest expense, provision for loan losses and through activity associated with our derivative instruments.

Consolidated VIEs. We have determined that our operating partnership, ARLP, and our CLO and Debt Fund subsidiaries, which are owned by ARLP, are VIEs. ARLP is already consolidated in our financial statements, therefore, the identification of this entity as a VIE had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Our CLO and Debt Fund consolidated subsidiaries invest in real estate and real estate-related securities and are financed by the issuance of debt securities. We, or one of our affiliates, are named collateral manager, servicer, and special servicer for all collateral assets held in CLOs, which we believe gives us the power to direct the most significant economic activities of those entities. We also have exposure to losses to the extent of our equity interests and also have rights to waterfall payments in excess of required payments to bond investors. As a result of consolidation, equity interests have been eliminated, and the consolidated balance sheets reflect both the assets held and debt issued by the CLOs and Debt Fund to third parties. Our operating results and cash flows include the gross amounts related to CLO and Debt Fund assets and liabilities as opposed to our net economic interests in those entities.

The assets and liabilities related to these consolidated CLOs and Debt Fund are as follows (in thousands):

Assets held by the CLOs and Debt Fund are restricted and can only be used to settle obligations of the CLOs and Debt Fund, respectively. The liabilities of the CLOs and Debt Fund are non-recourse to us and can only be satisfied from each respective asset pool. See Note 12—Debt Obligations for details.

We are not obligated to provide, have not provided, and do not intend to provide financial support to any of the consolidated CLOs or Debt Fund.

Unconsolidated VIEs. We determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of 21 VIEs in which we have a variable interest as of December 31, 2017 because we do not have the ability to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact each entity's economic performance.

The following is a summary of our variable interests in identified VIEs, of which we are not the primary beneficiary, as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands):

These unconsolidated VIEs have exposure to real estate debt of approximately $2.19 billion at December 31, 2017.

Preferred Stock. The Series A, B and C preferred stock may not be redeemed by us before February 2018, May 2018 and February 2019, respectively.

Common Stock. In May 2017, we completed a public offering in which we sold 9,500,000 shares of our common stock for $8.05 per share, and received net proceeds of $76.2 million after deducting the underwriting discount and other offering expenses. We used $25.0 million of the proceeds to exercise our option to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement with our Former Manager and the remaining amount was used to make investments and for general corporate purposes.

As of December 31, 2017, there were 7,500,000 common shares available under an "At-The-Market" equity offering with JMP Securities LLC.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $179.8 million available under our $500.0 million shelf registration statement that was declared effective by the SEC in July 2016.

Noncontrolling Interest. Noncontrolling interest relates to the 21,230,769 OP Units issued to satisfy a portion of the Acquisition purchase price. The value of these OP units at the Acquisition date was $154.8 million. Each of these OP Units are paired with one share of our Special Voting Preferred Shares having a par value of $0.01 per share and is entitled to one vote each on any matter submitted for stockholder approval, which represents approximately 25.6% of the voting power of our outstanding stock at December 31, 2017. The OP Units are entitled to receive distributions if and when our Board of Directors authorizes and declares common stock distributions. The OP Units are also redeemable for cash, or at our option, for shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Distributions. The following table presents dividends declared (on a per share basis) for the year ended December 31, 2017:

We have determined that 100% of the common stock and preferred stock dividends paid during 2017, 2016 and 2015 represented ordinary income to our stockholders for income tax purposes. In addition, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 59(d), alternative minimum tax ("AMT") could be apportioned between a REIT and its stockholders to the extent the REIT distributes its regular taxable income. Since we have distributed our taxable income, the AMT adjustments are being apportioned to our stockholders. As such, we have determined that 9.92% of each distribution to our stockholders for the tax year ended December 31, 2017 consists of an AMT adjustment (i.e., for each $1 of dividend reportable by a stockholder, $0.0992 represents an AMT adjustment).

Deferred Compensation. We have a stock incentive plan under which the Board of Directors has the authority to issue shares of stock to certain employees, officers, directors and, prior to May 31, 2017, employees of our Former Manager.

Vesting of restricted shares is dependent on a service requirement. Dividends paid on restricted shares are recorded as dividends on shares of our common stock whether or not they are vested. For accounting purposes, we measure the compensation costs for these shares as of the grant date, with subsequent remeasurement for any unvested shares granted to non-employees of ours with such amounts expensed against earnings, at the grant date (for the portion that vest immediately) or ratably over the respective vesting periods.

In 2017, we issued 299,750 shares of restricted common stock under the 2014 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the "2014 Plan") to certain employees of ours and our Former Manager with a total grant date fair value of $2.4 million. One third of the shares vested as of the grant date, one third will vest in March 2018, and the remaining third will vest in March 2019. On the grant date we recorded $0.3 million to employee compensation and benefits and $0.5 million to selling and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of income for the portion that vested immediately. In connection with the full integration of our management team and termination of the existing management contract, effective May 31, 2017, all stock compensation previously granted to employees that transferred from our Former Manager (non-employees prior to May 31, 2017) will be recorded to employee compensation and benefits based on the remeasured fair value on May 31, 2017 over the remaining requisite service period. We also issued 74,375 shares of fully vested common stock to the independent members of the Board of Directors under the 2014 Plan and recorded $0.6 million to selling and administrative expense.

We entered into an amended and restated annual incentive agreement (the "2017 annual incentive agreement") with our chief executive officer, effective January 1, 2017. The chief executive officer's

annual cash bonus and value of his annual long-term equity awards under the 2017 annual incentive agreement each increased 10% as a result of the Company meeting the equity capitalization growth goals in his previous incentive agreement. In addition, the chief executive officer is also eligible to receive a $3.0 million performance-based award of restricted stock annually for five years subject to meeting certain goals related to the integration of the Acquisition. Each $3.0 million award vests in full three years after the grant date and are subject to the chief executive officer's continued employment. In 2017, we granted our chief executive officer 357,569 shares of performance-based restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $2.7 million as a result of the Company meeting the goals related to the integration of the Acquisition. All other terms of the 2017 incentive agreement are consistent with the chief executive officer's previous incentive agreement.

In 2017, we issued 74,830 shares of restricted common stock to our chief executive officer under his 2017 annual incentive agreement with a grant date fair value of $0.6 million. One quarter of the shares vested as of the grant date and one quarter will vest on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. On the grant date we recorded $0.1 million to employee compensation and benefits in our consolidated statements of income for the portion that vested immediately. Our chief executive officer was also granted up to 448,980 performance-based restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $1.0 million that vest at the end of a four-year performance period based on our achievement of certain total stockholder return objectives. To date, our chief executive officer was granted in the aggregate up to 1,316,093 performance-based restricted stock units. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recorded $0.8 million, $0.5 million and $0.3 million to employee compensation and benefits related to performance-based restricted stock units.

As of December 31, 2017, unvested restricted stock consisted of 759,145 shares granted to our employees with a grant date fair value of $6.1 million and 15,827 shares granted to employees of our Former Manager with a grant date fair value of $0.1 million, which is subject to re-measurement each reporting period. Expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period in our consolidated statements of income in employee compensation and benefits expense and selling and administrative expense, respectively. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recorded the ratable portion of the unvested restricted stock to employees as employee compensation and benefits for $1.9 million, $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively, and for non-employees to selling and administrative expense for $0.6 million, $1.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

In 2016, we issued 282,405 shares of restricted common stock under the 2014 Plan to certain employees of ours and our Former Manager with a total grant date fair value of $1.9 million. One third of the shares vested as of the grant date, one third vested in March 2017, and the remaining third will vest in March 2018. On the grant date we recorded $0.2 million to employee compensation and benefits and $0.5 million to selling and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of income for the portion that vested immediately. We also issued 67,260 shares of fully vested common stock to the independent members of the Board of Directors under the 2014 Plan and recorded $0.4 million to selling and administrative expense.

In 2016, we issued 70,225 shares of restricted common stock to our chief executive officer under his annual incentive agreement with a grant date fair value of $0.5 million. One quarter of the shares vested as of the grant date and one quarter vests on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. On the grant date we recorded $0.1 million to employee compensation and benefits in

our consolidated statements of income for the portion that vested immediately. Our chief executive officer was also granted up to 421,348 performance-based restricted stock units that vest at the end of a four-year performance period based on our achievement of certain total stockholder return objectives. The restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $0.9 million.

As of December 31, 2016, unvested restricted stock consisted of 202,037 shares granted to our employees with a grant date fair value of $1.4 million and 195,139 shares granted to employees of our Former Manager with a grant date fair value of $1.3 million, which is subject to re-measurement each reporting period.

In 2015, we issued 328,400 shares of restricted common stock under the 2014 Plan to certain employees of ours and our Former Manager, inclusive of 105,000 shares granted to our chief executive officer, with a total grant date fair value of $2.3 million. One third of the shares vested as of the grant date, one third vested in 2016, and the remaining third vested in 2017. On the grant date we recorded $0.4 million to employee compensation and benefits and $0.4 million to selling and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of income for the portion that vested immediately. In 2015, we also issued 83,430 shares of fully vested common stock to the independent members of the Board of Directors under the 2014 Plan and recorded $0.5 million to selling and administrative expense.

In 2015, we issued 74,294 shares of restricted common stock to our chief executive officer under his annual incentive agreement with a grant date fair value of $0.5 million. One quarter of the shares vested as of the grant date and one quarter vest on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. On the grant date we recorded $0.1 million to employee compensation and benefits in our consolidated statements of income for the portion that vested immediately. Our chief executive officer was also granted up to 445,765 performance-based restricted stock units that vest at the end of a four-year performance period based on our achievement of certain total stockholder return objectives. The restricted stock units had a grant date fair value of $1.2 million.

As of December 31, 2015, unvested restricted stock consisted of 212,241 shares granted to our employees with a grant date fair value of $1.5 million and 154,169 shares granted to employees of our Former Manager with a grant date fair value of $1.1 million, which is subject to remeasurement each reporting period.

Earnings Per Share. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period inclusive of unvested restricted stock with full dividend participation rights. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the additional dilutive effect of common stock equivalents during each period using the treasury stock method. Our common stock equivalents include the weighted average dilutive effect of performance-based restricted stock units granted to our chief executive officer, OP Units issued in connection with the Acquisition and convertible senior unsecured notes.

The following tables reconcile the numerator and denominator of our basic and diluted EPS computations ($ in thousands, except share and per share data):

We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT and to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. A REIT is generally not subject to federal income tax on taxable income which it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes at least 90% of its REIT—taxable income and meets certain other requirements. Certain REIT income may be subject to state and local income taxes. We did not have any REIT—federal taxable income, net of dividends paid and net operating loss deductions, for 2017, 2016 and 2015, and therefore, have not provided for REIT federal income tax expense. The REIT incurred state tax expenses for 2017 and 2016, in the amount of $1.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively. In 2015, the REIT did not incur any state tax expense. For the 2009 and 2010 tax years, the income and the tax on certain debt extinguishment transactions was, at our election, deferred to be recognized ratably over five years from 2014 to 2018.

Certain of our assets and operations that would not otherwise comply with the REIT requirements, such as the Agency Business, are owned or conducted through our TRS Consolidated Group, the majority of the income of which is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. The TRS Consolidated Group has federal net operating losses from prior years, which will be used against the income from the Agency Business. For 2017 and 2016, we recorded a provision for income taxes related to the assets held in the TRS Consolidated Group and the REIT in the amount of $13.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively. In 2017 and 2016, a valuation allowance previously recorded at the TRS Consolidated Group was released in the amount of $3.5 million and $5.4 million, respectively. We did not record a provision for income taxes in 2015.

The following table provides a summary of our pre-tax GAAP income (in thousands):

Our provision for (benefit from) income taxes was comprised as follows (in thousands):

A reconciliation of our effective income tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income to the U.S. federal statutory rate is as follows:

The significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities of our TRS Consolidated Group were as follows (in thousands):

Our 2017 results of operations included the impact of the Tax Reform, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among numerous provisions included in the new tax law was the reduction of the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The provision for income taxes for 2017 included the newly enacted corporate federal income tax rate of 21%, which resulted in a deferred income tax benefit of approximately $5.3 million primarily from applying the new lower income tax rates to our net long term deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. The final impact of the Tax Reform may differ due to, and among other things, changes in interpretations, assumptions made by us, the issuance of additional guidance and actions we may take as a result of the Tax Reform.

At December 31, 2017, our TRS Consolidated Group had $16.5 million of deferred tax assets, net of a $3.4 million valuation allowance. The deferred tax assets consisted primarily of expenses not currently deductible and loan loss reserves. Our TRS Consolidated Group's deferred tax assets were offset by $27.3 million in deferred tax liabilities, which consisted primarily of timing differences from investments in equity affiliates, intangibles and mortgage servicing rights.

At December 31, 2016, our TRS Consolidated Group had $23.2 million of deferred tax assets, net of a $7.0 million valuation allowance. The deferred tax assets consisted primarily of expenses not currently deductible and loan loss reserves. Our TRS Consolidated Group's deferred tax assets were offset by $36.4 million in deferred tax liabilities, which consisted primarily of timing differences from investments in equity affiliates, intangibles and mortgage servicing rights.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the REIT (excluding the TRS Consolidated Group) had $3.3 million and $79.7 million, respectively, of federal net operating loss carryforwards and no capital loss carryforwards. A substantial portion of the net operating losses will expire between 2030 and 2033.

The TRS Consolidated Group had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $0.5 million at both December 31, 2017 and 2016, which expire through 2031. In 2016, the TRS Consolidated Group utilized net operating losses of $11.3 million.

We have assessed our tax positions for all open years, which includes 2014-2017, and have concluded that there were no material uncertainties to be recognized. We have not recognized any interest and penalties related to tax uncertainties for the years ended 2014 through 2017.

Management Agreement. Prior to May 31, 2017, we, ARLP and Arbor Realty SR, Inc. had a management agreement with ACM, pursuant to which ACM provided us with a variety of professional and advisory services vital to our operations, including underwriting, accounting and treasury, compliance, marketing, information technology and human resources. Pursuant to the terms of the management agreement, we reimbursed ACM for its actual costs incurred in connection with managing our business through a base management fee, and, under certain circumstances, an annual incentive fee. In May 2017, we exercised our option to fully internalize our management team and terminate the existing management agreement. See Note 3—Acquisition of Our Former Manager's Agency Platform for details.

The following table sets forth our base management fees and incentive fees incurred prior to the full internalization of our management team and termination of the existing management agreement (in thousands):

We have entered into a shared services agreement with our Former Manager and certain of its affiliates where we will provide limited support services to our Former Manager and our Former Manager will reimburse us for the costs of performing such services. During 2017, we incurred $0.7 million of costs for services provided to our Former Manager which are included in due from related party on the consolidated balance sheet.

Other Related Party Transactions. Due from related party was $0.7 million at December 31, 2017, which consisted primarily of amounts due from our Former Manager for costs incurred in connection with the shared services agreement described above. Due from related party was $1.5 million at December 31, 2016 and consisted primarily of paydowns to be remitted and escrows held by our affiliated servicing operations related to real estate transactions.

Due to related party was $6.0 million at December 31, 2016 and consisted primarily of base management fees due to our Manager that we remitted in the following quarter.

Related party financing was $50.0 million at both December 31, 2017 and 2016 and represents a $50.0 million preferred equity interest financing agreement we entered into with ACM to finance a portion of the aggregate purchase price of the Acquisition. We incurred interest expense of $3.8 million and $1.8 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively, from this debt. In January 2018, this debt was paid off in full. See Note 12—Debt Obligations for details.

In December 2017, we acquired a $32.8 million bridge loan which was originated by our Former Manager. The loan was used to purchase several multifamily properties by a consortium of investors, which consisted of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, who together own 90% of the borrowing entity. The loan has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 5.0% with a LIBOR floor of 1.13% and matures in June 2020. Interest income recorded from this loan totaled $0.1 million for 2017.

In the fourth quarter of 2017, we originated two bridge loans totaling $28.0 million on two multifamily properties owned by a consortium of investors, consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, who together own 45% in the borrowing entity. The loans have an interest rate of LIBOR plus 5.25% with LIBOR floors ranging from 1.24% to 1.54% and mature in the fourth quarter of 2020. Interest income recorded from these loans totaled $0.2 million for 2017.

In July 2017, we originated a $36.0 million bridge loan on a multifamily property owned by a consortium of investors. The consortium of investors includes certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, who own an interest of approximately 95% in the borrowing entity. The loan has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 4.5% with a LIBOR floor of 1% and matures in July 2020. Interest income recorded from this loan totaled $0.9 million for 2017.

In May 2017, we originated a $46.9 million Fannie Mae loan on a multifamily property owned by a consortium of investors, including certain of our officers, who together own an interest of approximately 21.4% in the borrowing entity. We carry a maximum loss-sharing obligation with Fannie Mae on this loan of up to 5% of the original UPB. Servicing revenue recorded from this loan was less than $0.1 million for 2017.

In March 2017, a consortium of investors, including our chief executive officer and our Former Manager, invested $2.0 million for a 26.1% ownership interest in two portfolios of multifamily properties which has two bridge loans totaling $14.8 million originated by us in 2016. The loans have an

interest rate of LIBOR plus 5.25% with a LIBOR floor of 0.5% and mature in November 2018. One of the loans was repaid in full in the fourth quarter of 2017 and we received proceeds of $6.5 million. Interest income recorded from these loans totaled $1.0 million for 2017.

In January 2017, we modified a $5.0 million preferred equity investment, increasing our balance to $15.0 million, with a commitment to fund an additional $5.0 million. This investment had a fixed interest rate of 11% and was scheduled to mature in January 2020, however, it was repaid in full in the fourth quarter of 2017. We also entered into an agreement with a consortium of investors consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, which admitted them as a member to fund the remaining $5.0 million preferred equity investment, which was generally subordinate to our investment. Interest income recorded from our investment totaled $1.1 million for 2017.

In January 2017, Ginkgo Investment Company LLC ("Ginkgo"), of which one of our directors is a 33% managing member, purchased a multifamily apartment complex which assumed an existing $8.3 million Fannie Mae loan that we service. Ginkgo subsequently sold the majority of its interest in this property and owned a 3.6% interest at December 31, 2017. We carry a maximum loss-sharing obligation with Fannie Mae on this loan of up to 20% of the original UPB. Upon the sale, we received a 1% loan assumption fee which was governed by existing loan agreements that were in place when the loan was originated in 2015, prior to such purchase. Servicing revenue recorded from this loan was $0.1 million for 2017.

In September 2016, we originated $48.0 million of bridge loans on six multifamily properties owned by a consortium of investors consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, who together own interests ranging from approximately 10.5% to 12.0% in the borrowing entities. The loans have an interest rate of LIBOR plus 4.5% with a LIBOR floor of 0.25% and mature in September 2019. In August 2017, a $6.8 million loan on one of the properties paid off in full. Interest income recorded from these loans totaled $2.7 million and $0.7 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In January 2016, we originated a $12.7 million bridge loan and a $5.2 million preferred equity investment on two multifamily properties owned by a consortium of investors consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, who together own an interest of approximately 50% in the borrowing entity. The loan has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 4.5% with a LIBOR floor of 0.25% and matures in January 2019. The preferred equity investment has a fixed interest rate of 10% and a maturity date extended to May 2018. Interest income recorded from these loans totaled $1.3 million and $1.2 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In January 2016, we originated a $19.0 million bridge loan on a multifamily property owned by a consortium of investors consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, who together own an interest of approximately 7.5% in the borrowing entity. The loan had an interest rate of LIBOR plus 4.5% with a LIBOR floor of 0.25% and was scheduled to mature in January 2019. In January 2018, this loan paid off in full. Interest income recorded from this loan totaled $1.1 million and $1.0 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In November 2015, we originated a $7.1 million bridge loan on a multifamily property owned by a consortium of investors consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, who together own an interest of approximately 7.5% in the borrowing entity. In August 2017, this loan paid off in full. The loan had an interest rate of LIBOR plus 4.5%, with a LIBOR floor of 0.25%. Interest

income recorded from this loan totaled $0.3 million, $0.4 million and $0.1 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In October 2015, we originated two bridge loans totaling $16.7 million secured by multifamily properties acquired by a third party investor. The properties had been owned and were sold by a consortium of investors, consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, certain other related parties and certain unaffiliated persons. The loans have an interest rate of LIBOR plus 5% with a LIBOR floor of 0.25% and were extended as of right to October 2018. Interest income recorded from these loans totaled $1.1 million, $1.0 million and $0.2 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In April 2015, we originated a $3.0 million mezzanine loan on a multifamily property that has a $47.0 million first mortgage initially originated by our Former Manager. The loan bore interest at a fixed rate of 12.5% and was scheduled to mature in April 2025. In January 2018, this loan paid off in full. Interest income recorded from this loan totaled $0.3 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In April 2015, we originated a $6.3 million bridge loan on a multifamily property owned by a consortium of investors consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer and our Former Manager, who together own an interest of approximately 90% in the borrowing entity. The loan had an interest rate of LIBOR plus 4.5% with a LIBOR floor of 0.25% and was scheduled to mature in April 2018. The loan was repaid in full in 2016 and we received proceeds of $6.3 million. Interest income recorded from this loan totaled $0.4 million and $0.2 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In February 2015, we modified an $18.0 million preferred equity investment, increasing our balance to $23.0 million with a fixed interest rate of 10% and was scheduled to mature in February 2018. To accomplish the modification, we formed a joint venture with a consortium of investors consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, and other related parties, to invest an additional $2.0 million preferred equity investment that is generally subordinate to ours. During 2016, the preferred equity investment was repaid in full and we received proceeds of $1.0 million. Interest income recorded from this loan was $1.0 million and $2.3 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In 2015, we invested $9.6 million for 50% of our Former Manager's indirect interest in a joint venture with a third party that was formed to invest in a residential mortgage banking business. As a result of this transaction, we had an initial indirect interest of 22.5% in this entity. Since the initial investment, we invested an additional $16.1 million through this joint venture in non-qualified residential mortgages purchased from the mortgage banking business's origination platform (which $0.6 million was funded in 2017) and we received cash distributions totaling $16.2 million (that were classified as returns of capital) as a result of the joint venture selling most of its mortgage assets (which $3.2 million was received in 2017). We recorded a loss from these investments of $7.2 million in 2017 and income of $10.0 million and $6.0 million during 2016 and 2015, respectively. In connection with a litigation settlement related to this investment, we provided a guaranty of up to 50% of any amounts payable in connection with the settlement. Our Former Manager has also provided us with a guaranty to pay up to 50% of any amounts we may pay under this guaranty. Our maximum exposure under this guaranty totals $3.1 million. We have not accrued this amount as we currently believe that we will not

be required to make any payments under this guaranty. See Note 9—Investments in Equity Affiliates for details.

In 2014, we invested $0.1 million for a 5% interest in a joint venture that owns two multifamily properties. The joint venture is comprised of a consortium of investors consisting of certain of our officers, including our chief executive officer, and other related parties, who together own an interest of 95%. In 2014, we originated two bridge loans totaling $5.0 million to the joint venture with an interest rate of 5.5% over LIBOR. During 2016, one of the loans was repaid in full and we received proceeds of $3.3 million. The maturity date of the remaining loan was extended to December 2017. During the fourth quarter of 2017, this loan was repaid in full and we received proceeds of $1.7 million. Interest income recorded from these loans totaled $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In 2014, we originated a $30.4 million bridge loan for an office property owned by a consortium of investors, including our chief executive officer and his affiliates, who together owned an interest of approximately 24% in the borrowing entity. The loan matured in August 2017 and was refinanced with a $43.2 million bridge loan that has an interest rate of 4% over LIBOR with a LIBOR floor of 1.23% and an August 2020 maturity date. We also originated a $4.6 million mezzanine loan in 2016 to this entity that had a fixed interest rate of 12%, which was repaid in full at maturity in August 2017. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the consortium of investors sold their ownership interest in the borrowing entity. Interest income recorded from these loans totaled $3.1 million, $3.5 million and $2.8 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In 2014, our Former Manager purchased a property subject to two loans originated by us, a first mortgage of $14.6 million and a second mortgage of $5.1 million, both with maturity dates of April 2016 and an interest rate of 4.8% over LIBOR. In 2016, the $5.1 million second mortgage was repaid in full by our Former Manager and the $14.6 million first mortgage was extended to March 2018. Interest income recorded from these loans totaled $0.9 million, $0.9 million and $1.1 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In 2011, we restructured a preferred equity investment in the Lexford Portfolio ("Lexford"), which is a portfolio of multifamily assets. In connection with this restructuring, we, along with an executive officer of ours and a consortium of independent outside investors, made an additional preferred and direct equity investment. Both of our preferred equity investments and our direct equity investment were repaid in full in 2015. As a result of the direct equity investment, we received distributions totaling $2.5 million, $2.8 million and $5.5 million during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which were recorded in (loss) income from equity affiliates. In addition, under the terms of the restructuring, Lexford's first mortgage lender required a change of property manager for the underlying assets. The new management company is owned primarily by a consortium of affiliated investors including our chief executive officer and an executive officer of ours, and has a contract with the new entity for 7.5 years and is entitled to 4.75% of gross revenues of the underlying properties, along with the potential to share in the proceeds of a sale or refinancing of the debt should the management company remain engaged by the new entity at the time of such capital event. We have provided limited ("bad boy") guarantees for certain debt controlled by Lexford. The bad boy guarantees may become a liability for us upon standard "bad" acts such as fraud or a material misrepresentation by Lexford or us. At

December 31, 2017, this debt had an aggregate outstanding balance of $844.7 million and is scheduled to mature between 2018 and 2025.

Interest income recorded from loans originated in 2013 or prior years with our affiliates totaled $0.3 million for 2015. There was no interest income recorded in 2017 and 2016 from these transactions.

Several of our executives, including our chief financial officer, general counsel and our chairman, chief executive officer and president, hold similar positions for our Former Manager. Our chief executive officer and his affiliated entities ("the Kaufman Entities") together beneficially own approximately 70% of the outstanding membership interests of our Former Manager and certain of our employees and directors also hold an ownership interest in our Former Manager. Furthermore, one of our directors serves as the trustee and co-trustee of two of the Kaufman Entities that hold membership interests in our Former Manager. Upon the closing of the Acquisition in 2016, our Former Manager was issued 21,230,769 OP Units, each paired with one share of our Special Voting Preferred Shares. In December 2017, our Former Manager distributed 5,780,348 OP units to its members, which includes the Kaufman Entities and certain of our officers and employees. At December 31, 2017, our Former Manager holds 5,349,053 shares of our common stock and 15,450,421 OP Units, which represents approximately 25% of the voting power of our outstanding stock. Our Board of Directors approved a resolution under our charter allowing our chief executive officer and our Former Manager, (which our chief executive officer has a controlling equity interest in), to own more than the 5% ownership interest limit of our common stock as stated in our amended charter.

We assumed a 401(k) defined contribution plan (the "401(k) Plan") and a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the "Deferred Comp Plan") in connection with the Acquisition.

The 401(k) Plan is available to all employees who have completed six months of continuous service. The 401(k) Plan matches 25% of the first 6% of each employee's contribution. We have the option to increase the employer match based on our operating results. In 2017 and 2016, we recorded $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of expenses associated with the 401(k) Plan, which is included in employee compensation and benefits in our consolidated statements of income.

The Deferred Comp Plan is offered to certain full-time employees and is subject to the rules of section 409(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the Deferred Comp Plan, which can be modified or discontinued at any time, participating employees may defer a portion of their compensation and we are contractually obligated to match the contribution, as specified in the Deferred Comp Plan, and fund such amounts upon vesting and an election by participants to redeem their interests. All employee deferrals vest immediately and matching contributions vest over a nine year period beginning after year five. For 2017 and 2016, there were $2.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, of employee deferrals. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had recorded liabilities totaling $5.9 million and $3.5 million, respectively, and assets of $4.5 million and $2.8 million, respectively, related to the Deferred Comp Plan, which is included in other liabilities and other assets, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheets.

As a result of the Acquisition, we evaluate our results from operations from two business segments—our Structured Business and our Agency Business. See Note 1—Description of Business for a description of each segment.

The summarized statements of income and balance sheet data, as well as certain other data, by segment are included in the following tables ($ in thousands). Specifically identifiable costs are recorded directly to each business segment. For items not specifically identifiable, costs have been allocated between the business segments using the most meaningful allocation methodologies, which was predominately direct labor costs (i.e., time spent working on each business segment). Such costs include, but are not limited to, compensation and employee related costs, selling and administrative expenses, management fees (through May 31, 2017—effective date of the full internalization of our management team and termination of the existing management agreement with our Former Manager) and stock-based compensation.

The comparable summarized statements of income for 2015 is not provided since we operated as a single business segment in that period.

	Year Ended December 31, 2017

	Structured Business			Agency Business			Other / Eliminations(1)			Consolidated
Interest income	$	136,526		$	19,651		$	—		$	156,177
Interest expense		74,136			12,089			3,847			90,072

Net interest income		62,390			7,562			(3,847	)		66,105

Other revenue:
Gain on sales, including fee-based services, net		—			72,799			—			72,799
Mortgage servicing rights		—			76,820			—			76,820
Servicing revenue		—			76,412			—			76,412
Amortization of MSRs		—			(47,202	)		—			(47,202	)
Property operating income		10,973			—			—			10,973
Other income, net		2,083			(1,398	)		—			685

Total other revenue		13,056			177,431			—			190,487

Other expenses:
Employee compensation and benefits		19,555			72,571			—			92,126
Selling and administrative		11,765			18,973			—			30,738
Property operating expenses		10,482			—			—			10,482
Depreciation and amortization		1,784			5,601			—			7,385
Impairment loss on real estate owned		3,200			—			—			3,200
Provision for loss sharing (net of recoveries)		—			(259	)		—			(259	)
Provision for loan losses (net of recoveries)		(456	)		—			—			(456	)
Management fee—related party		3,259			3,414			—			6,673

Total other expenses		49,589			100,300			—			149,889

Income before gain on extinguishment of debt, loss from equity affiliates and provision for income taxes		25,857			84,693			(3,847	)		106,703
Gain on extinguishment of debt		7,116			—			—			7,116
Loss from equity affiliates		(2,951	)		—			—			(2,951	)
Provision for income taxes		(957	)		(12,402	)		—			(13,359	)

Net income		29,065			72,291			(3,847	)		97,509

Preferred stock dividends		7,554			—			—			7,554
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			24,120			24,120

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	21,511		$	72,291		$	(27,967	)	$	65,835

The Agency Business information for 2016 in the following table includes only the operating results of the Acquisition from July 14, 2016 (Acquisition closing date) to December 31, 2016.

	Year Ended December 31, 2016

	Structured Business			Agency Business			Other / Eliminations(1)			Consolidated
Interest income	$	109,622		$	6,551		$	—		$	116,173
Other interest income, net		2,539			—			—			2,539
Interest expense		57,943			3,887			1,793			63,623

Net interest income		54,218			2,664			(1,793	)		55,089

Other revenue:
Gain on sales, including fee-based services, net		—			24,594			—			24,594
Mortgage servicing rights		—			44,941			—			44,941
Servicing revenue		—			30,759			—			30,759
Amortization of MSRs		—			(21,705	)		—			(21,705	)
Property operating income		14,881			—			—			14,881
Other income, net		542			499			—			1,041

Total other revenue		15,423			79,088			—			94,511

Other expenses:
Employee compensation and benefits		14,884			23,763			—			38,647
Selling and administrative		9,714			7,873			—			17,587
Acquisition costs		—			—			10,262			10,262
Property operating expenses		13,501			—			—			13,501
Depreciation and amortization		2,454			2,568			—			5,022
Impairment loss on real estate owned		11,200			—			—			11,200
Provision for loss sharing		—			2,235			—			2,235
Provision for loan losses (net of recoveries)		(134	)		—			—			(134	)
Management fee—related party		9,044			3,556			—			12,600

Total other expenses		60,663			39,995			10,262			110,920

Income before gain on sale of real estate, income from equity affiliates and provision for income taxes		8,978			41,757			(12,055	)		38,680
Gain on sale of real estate		11,631			—			—			11,631
Income from equity affiliates		12,995			—			—			12,995
Provision for income taxes		—			(825	)		—			(825	)

Net income		33,604			40,932			(12,055	)		62,481

Preferred stock dividends		7,554			—			—			7,554
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			12,131			12,131

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	26,050		$	40,932		$	(24,186	)	$	42,796

	December 31, 2017

	Structured Business		Agency Business		Other / Eliminations		Consolidated
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	37,056	$	67,318	$	—	$	104,374
Restricted cash		139,398		—		—		139,398
Loans and investments, net		2,579,127		—		—		2,579,127
Loans held-for-sale, net		—		297,443		—		297,443
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net		—		252,608		—		252,608
Securities held-to-maturity, net		—		27,837		—		27,837
Investments in equity affiliates		23,653		—		—		23,653
Goodwill and other intangible assets		12,500		109,266		—		121,766
Other assets		66,227		13,512		—		79,739

Total assets	$	2,857,961	$	767,984	$	—	$	3,625,945



Liabilities:
Debt obligations	$	2,189,700	$	291,536	$	50,000	$	2,531,236
Allowance for loss-sharing obligations		—		30,511		—		30,511
Other liabilities		155,814		42,819		1,009		199,642

Total liabilities	$	2,345,514	$	364,866	$	51,009	$	2,761,389

	December 31, 2016

	Structured Business		Agency Business		Other / Eliminations		Consolidated
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	103,156	$	35,489	$	—	$	138,645
Restricted cash		16,230		13,085		—		29,315
Loans and investments, net		1,695,732		—		—		1,695,732
Loans held-for-sale, net		—		673,367		—		673,367
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights, net		—		227,743		—		227,743
Investments in equity affiliates		33,949		—		—		33,949
Goodwill and other intangible assets		—		97,490		—		97,490
Other assets		63,351		11,194		—		74,545

Total assets	$	1,912,418	$	1,058,368	$	—	$	2,970,786



Liabilities:
Debt obligations	$	1,307,974	$	660,144	$	50,000	$	2,018,118
Allowance for loss-sharing obligations		—		32,408		—		32,408
Other liabilities		133,788		38,216		1,218		173,222

Total liabilities	$	1,441,762	$	730,768	$	51,218	$	2,223,748

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017			2016			2015
Origination Data:
Structured Business
New loan originations	$	1,842,974		$	847,683		$	828,218
Loan payoffs / paydowns		924,120			553,409			828,670
Agency Business
Origination Volumes by Investor:
Fannie Mae	$	2,929,481		$	1,668,581
Freddie Mac		1,322,498			456,422
FHA		189,087			24,630
CMBS/Conduit		21,370			—

Total	$	4,462,436		$	2,149,633



Total loan commitment volume	$	4,344,328		$	2,129,720



Loan Sales Data:
Agency Business
Fannie Mae	$	3,223,953		$	1,130,392
Freddie Mac		1,399,029			332,319
FHA		170,554			29,673
CMBS/Conduit		21,370			—

Total	$	4,814,906		$	1,492,384	(1)



Sales margin (fee-based services as a % of loan sales)		1.51	%		1.65	%



MSR rate (MSR income as a % of loan commitments)		1.77	%		2.11	%

The following tables represent summarized quarterly financial data for 2017 and 2016 ($ in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended

	December 31, 2017			September 30, 2017			June 30, 2017			March 31, 2017
Net interest income	$	19,671		$	18,290		$	14,057		$	14,088
Total other revenue		51,431			47,989			44,735			46,332
Total other expenses		37,999			36,596			37,043			38,254

Income before gain on extinguishment of debt, (loss) income from equity affiliates and benefit from (provision for) income taxes		33,103			29,683			21,749			22,166
Gain on extinguishment of debt		—			—			—			7,116
(Loss) income from equity affiliates		(4,706	)		995			(3	)		763
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes		2,885			(6,708	)		(3,435	)		(6,101	)

Net income		31,282			23,970			18,311			23,944
Preferred stock dividends		1,888			1,888			1,888			1,888
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		7,524			5,661			4,494			6,442

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	21,870		$	16,421		$	11,929		$	15,614



Basic earnings per common share(1)	$	0.35		$	0.27		$	0.21		$	0.30



Diluted earnings per common share(1)	$	0.35		$	0.26		$	0.21		$	0.30

	Three Months Ended

	December 31, 2016			September 30, 2016			June 30, 2016			March 31, 2016
Net interest income	$	12,084		$	12,670		$	17,265		$	13,070
Total other revenue		49,581			34,868			4,641			5,421
Total other expenses		32,036			35,742			25,170			17,973

Income (loss) before gain on sale of real estate, income from equity affiliates and provision for income taxes		29,629			11,796			(3,264	)		518
Gain on sale of real estate		—			—			11,023			608
Income from equity affiliates		1,801			4,929			4,367			1,897
Provision for income taxes		(525	)		(300	)		—			—

Net income		30,905			16,425			12,126			3,023
Preferred stock dividends		1,888			1,888			1,888			1,888
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		8,482			3,649			—			—

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	20,535		$	10,888		$	10,238		$	1,135



Basic earnings per common share(1)	$	0.40		$	0.21		$	0.20		$	0.02



Diluted earnings per common share(1)	$	0.40		$	0.21		$	0.20		$	0.02

ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE IV—LOANS AND OTHER LENDING INVESTMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2017

($ in thousands)

Type	Location	Periodic Payment Terms(1)	Maturity Date(2)	Interest Pay Rate Index(3)	Prior Liens		Face Amount(4)		Carrying Amount(5)		Carrying Amount Subject to Delinquent Interest

*Bridge Loans:*
Bridge loans in excess of 3% of carrying amount of total loans:
Multifamily	TX	IO	2020	LIBOR + 3.60% Floor 1.36%	$	—	$	151,500	$	151,680	$	—
Bridge loans less than 3% of carrying amount of total loans (6):
Multifamily	Various	IO / PI	2018 - 2022	LIBOR + 3.00% - 12.975% Floor 0.17% - 1.57% Fixed 3.00% - 12.00%		—		1,620,123		1,613,790		—
Self Storage	Various	IO	2018 - 2022	LIBOR + 3.90% - 6.00% Floor 0.25% - 1.53%		—		301,830		299,803		—
Land	CA	IO	2018	LIBOR + 4.00% Floor 0.15% Fixed 0.00% - 11.64%		—		117,494		63,612		—
Office	Various	IO / PI	2018 - 2020	LIBOR + 3.10% - 6.25% Floor 0.50% - 1.23%		—		106,943		104,747		—
Healthcare	Various	IO	2018 - 2020	LIBOR + 5.50% - 6.75% Floor 1.12% - 1.49%		—		55,615		55,205		—
Hotel	NY	IO	2019	LIBOR + 5.30% - 8.28% Floor 0.45%		—		36,000		35,827		—
Retail	CT	IO	2020	LIBOR + 8.95% Floor 1.00%		—		32,600		32,402		—

						—		2,270,605		2,205,386		—

Total Bridge Loans						—		2,422,105		2,357,066		—

*Preferred Equity Loans:*
Preferred equity loans less than 3% of carrying amount of total loans (6):
Multifamily	Various	IO / PI	2018 - 2029	Fixed 6.00% - 14.00%		515,195		105,532		105,135		—
Hotel	IL	IO	2019	LIBOR + 2.79%		46,500		34,750		29,050		—
Commercial	NY	IO	2018	Fixed 6.00%		29,792		1,700		—		—
Office	SC	IO	2024	Fixed 15.00%		10,123		910		897		—

Total Preferred Equity Loans						601,610		142,892		135,082		—

The following table reconciles our loans and investments carrying amounts for the periods indicated (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017			2016			2015
Balance at beginning of year	$	1,695,732		$	1,450,334		$	1,459,476
Additions during period:
New loan originations		1,842,974			847,683			944,251
Loan charge-offs		20,473			2,959			32,000
Funding of unfunded loan commitments(1)		51,689			7,851			6,929
Accretion of unearned revenue		6,519			4,297			5,556
Charge-off on loan converted to real estate owned		—			—			2,500
Recoveries of reserves		2,456			193			2,042
Deductions during period:
Loan payoffs and paydowns		(929,796	)		(556,893	)		(946,078	)
Unfunded loan commitments(1)		(77,233	)		(50,691	)		(4,225	)
Use of loan charge-offs		(20,473	)		(2,959	)		(32,000	)
Loan converted to real estate owned		—			—			(8,400	)
Provision for loan losses		(2,000	)		(59	)		(6,509	)
Unearned revenue and costs		(11,214	)		(6,983	)		(3,908	)
Satisfaction of participation loan		—			—			(1,300	)

Balance at end of year	$	2,579,127		$	1,695,732		$	1,450,334

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures at December 31, 2017. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.

No change in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal controls over financial reporting.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by the Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatement. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, we concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a report on management's assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 23, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the

risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The information regarding our directors and executive officers set forth under the captions "Board of Directors" and "Executive Officers" of the 2018 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

The information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act set forth under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the 2018 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

The information regarding our code of ethics for our chief executive and other senior financial officers under the caption "Senior Officer Code of Ethics and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics" in the 2018 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

The information regarding our audit committee under the caption "Audit Committee" in the 2018 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

The information contained in the section captioned "Executive Compensation" of the 2018 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information contained in the section captioned "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" of the 2018 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information contained in the section captioned "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Director Independence" of the 2018 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

The information regarding our independent accountant's fees and services in the sections captioned "Independent Accountants' Fees" and "Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy" of the 2018 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

See the index to the consolidated financial statements and schedules included in Item 8 of this report.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


ý		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
or
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		20-0057959 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
333 Earle Ovington Boulevard, Suite 900, Uniondale, NY (Address of principal executive offices)		11553 (Zip Code)


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer ý		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o Emerging growth company o



PART I
Item 1.	Business	2
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	14
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	38
Item 2.	Properties	38
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	38
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	38
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	41
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	43
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	63
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	66
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	153
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	153
Item 9B.	Other Information	156
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	156
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	156
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	156
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	156
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	156
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	157
	Signatures	162

Type	Asset Class		Unpaid Principal

Bridge Loans	Multifamily	120	$	1,771,623	6.29	%	19.4
	Self Storage	13		301,830	6.22	%	32.8
	Land	7		117,495	0.08	%	7.9
	Office	5		106,942	6.58	%	20.1
	Other	5		124,215	8.70	%	26.8

		150		2,422,105	6.10	%	20.9

Preferred Equity	Multifamily	9		105,532	8.63	%	86.2
	Hotel	1		34,750	0.00	%	19.0
	Other	2		2,610	5.23	%	26.8

		12		142,892	6.47	%	68.7

Mezzanine Loans	Multifamily	3		48,374	11.30	%	21.8
	Hotel	1		19,975	14.56	%	32.0
	Land	2		15,333	4.70	%	11.5
	Other	2		3,859	8.89	%	77.3

		8		87,541	10.78	%	24.8

Total		170	$	2,652,538	6.28	%	23.6

Asset Class	UPB				Geographic Location	UPB

Multifamily	$	1,925,529	73	%	Texas	$	612,483	23	%
Self Storage		301,830	11	%	New York		562,860	21	%
Land		132,828	5	%	California		291,730	11	%
Office		107,853	4	%	Georgia		171,815	7	%
Other		184,498	7	%	Tennessee		129,068	5	%

Total	$	2,652,538	100	%	Other(1)		884,582	33	%




					Total	$	2,652,538	100	%

Product Concentrations

Product Concentrations										Geographic Concentrations
	Loan Count				Wtd. Avg. Servicing Fee Rate		Percent of Total			Geographic Concentrations
Product	Loan Count		UPB		Wtd. Avg. Servicing Fee Rate		Percent of Total			State	UPB
Fannie Mae		2,208	$	12,502,699		53.6		77	%	Texas		22	%
Freddie Mac		1,031		3,166,134		29.5		20	%	North Carolina		10	%
FHA		83		537,482		16.5		3	%	California		8	%

Total		3,322	$	16,206,315		47.7		100	%	New York		8	%



										Georgia		6	%
										Florida		6	%
										Other(1)		40	%

										Total		100	%

	High		Low		Dividends Declared			High		Low		Dividends Declared

*2017*							*2016*
Fourth Quarter(1)	$	8.84	$	8.12	$	0.19	Fourth Quarter	$	7.88	$	6.92	$	0.16
Third Quarter	$	8.50	$	7.88	$	0.18	Third Quarter	$	7.99	$	7.00	$	0.16
Second Quarter	$	8.99	$	7.83	$	0.18	Second Quarter	$	7.20	$	6.59	$	0.15
First Quarter	$	8.40	$	7.11	$	0.17	First Quarter	$	7.35	$	6.01	$	0.15

Plan Category

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
2017 Plan(1)	0	N/A	3,596,828
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	N/A	N/A	N/A

Total	0	N/A	3,596,828

	Period Ended

Index	12/31/12		12/31/13		12/31/14		12/31/15		12/31/16		12/31/17
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.		100.00		119.02		130.34		150.01		170.67		216.04
Russell 2000 Index		100.00		138.82		145.62		139.19		168.85		193.58
NAREIT All REITs Index		100.00		103.21		131.23		134.23		146.69		160.29
FTSE NAREIT Mortgage REITs Index		100.00		98.04		115.57		105.31		129.38		154.98

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017			2016(1)			2015		2014		2013
Operating Data:
Net interest income	$	66,105		$	55,089		$	64,933	$	58,813	$	56,966
Total other revenue		190,487			94,511			27,936		34,287		32,418
Total other expenses		149,889			110,920			74,067		68,649		72,812
Total other gains, net		4,165			24,626			34,627		68,597		4,727
Provision for income taxes		(13,359	)		(825	)		—		—		—
Net income		97,509			62,481			53,429		93,048		21,299
Preferred stock dividends		7,554			7,554			7,554		7,256		4,507
Net income attributable to common stockholders		65,835			42,796			45,875		85,792		16,668
Share Data:
Income per share, basic(2)		1.14			0.83			0.90		1.71		0.39
Income per share, diluted(2)(3)		1.12			0.83			0.90		1.70		0.39
Dividends declared per common share		0.72			0.62			0.58		0.52		0.50

	Year Ended December 31,

	2017			2016
Loans originated	$	1,842,974		$	847,683
Number of loans		93			70
Weighted average interest rate		7.04	%		6.74	%
Loans paid-off / paid-down	$	924,120		$	553,409
Number of loans		64			54
Weighted average interest rate		7.10	%		6.97	%
Loans extended	$	426,183		$	569,134
Number of loans		48			51

Common Stock			Preferred Stock

				Dividend(1)
Declaration Date	Dividend		Declaration Date	Series A		Series B		Series C
November 1, 2017	$	0.19	November 1, 2017	$	0.515625	$	0.484375	$	0.53125
August 2, 2017	$	0.18	August 2, 2017	$	0.515625	$	0.484375	$	0.53125
May 3, 2017	$	0.18	May 3, 2017	$	0.515625	$	0.484375	$	0.53125
March 1, 2017	$	0.17	February 3, 2017	$	0.515625	$	0.484375	$	0.53125

	December 31, 2017

Debt Facilities	Commitment		UPB(1)		Available		Maturity Dates
Structured Business
Credit facilities and repurchase agreements	$	673,745	$	239,222	$	434,523	2018 - 2020
Collateralized loan obligations(2)		1,436,274		1,436,274		—	2018 - 2022
Debt Fund(2)		70,000		70,000		—	2019 - 2021
Senior unsecured notes		97,860		97,860		—	2021
Convertible unsecured senior notes		243,750		243,750		—	2019 - 2020
Junior subordinated notes		154,336		154,336		—	2034 - 2037

Structured transaction business total		2,675,965		2,241,442		434,523
Agency Business
Credit facilities(3)		1,150,000		291,716		858,284	2018
Other
Related party financing(4)		50,000		50,000		—	2021

Consolidated total	$	3,875,965	$	2,583,158	$	1,292,807

	Payments Due by Period(1)

	Year Ending December 31,
Contractual Obligations	2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		Thereafter		Totals
Credit facilities and repurchase agreements	$	454,565	$	20,600	$	1,835	$	—	$	—	$	53,938	$	530,938
Collateralized loan obligations(2)		209,593		360,833		552,479		263,850		49,519		—		1,436,274
Debt Fund(3)		—		26,500		35,995		7,505		—		—		70,000
Senior unsecured notes		—		—		—		97,860		—		—		97,860
Covertible unsecured senior notes		—		100,000		143,750		—		—		—		243,750
Junor subordinated notes(4)		—		—		—		—		—		154,336		154,336
Related party financing(5)		—		—		—		62,500		—		—		62,500
Outstanding unfunded commitments(6)		31,669		26,113		10,828		—		—		—		68,610
Operating leases(7)		4,361		3,719		3,143		1,725		1,597		5,329		19,874

Totals	$	700,188	$	537,765	$	748,030	$	433,440	$	51,116	$	213,603	$	2,684,142

	Assets (Liabilities) Subject to Interest Rate Sensitivity(1)			25 Basis Point Increase		25 Basis Point Decrease(2)			50 Basis Point Increase		50 Basis Point Decrease(2)

Interest income from loans and investments	$	2,652,538		$	5,810	$	(5,331	)	$	11,621	$	(8,698	)
Interest expense from debt obligations		(2,291,442	)		4,745		(4,745	)		9,490		(9,490	)

Total net interest income				$	1,065	$	(586	)	$	2,131	$	792

		Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms			67
Consolidated Balance Sheets			69
Consolidated Statements of Income			70
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income			71
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity			72
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows			73
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			75
Schedule IV—Loans and Other Lending Investments			150

	December 31, 2016

Bridge loans	$	1,602,658		90	%	120	5.59	%	16.4	0	%	73	%
Preferred equity investments		68,121		4	%	10	6.83	%	23.8	42	%	91	%
Mezzanine loans		57,124		3	%	12	9.09	%	17.9	36	%	75	%
Junior participation loans		62,257		3	%	2	4.50	%	4.0	83	%	84	%

		1,790,160		100	%	144	5.71	%	16.3	6	%	75	%



Unearned revenue		(10,716	)
Allowance for loan losses		(83,712	)

Loans and investments, net	$	1,695,732

	December 31, 2017

Asset Class	UPB		Percentage of Portfolio			Wtd. Avg. Internal Risk Rating	Wtd. Avg. First Dollar LTV Ratio			Wtd. Avg. Last Dollar LTV Ratio
Multifamily	$	1,925,529		73	%	pass/watch		4	%		72	%
Self Storage		301,830		11	%	pass		0	%		71	%
Land		132,828		5	%	substandard		0	%		90	%
Office		107,853		4	%	pass/watch		1	%		64	%
Hotel		90,725		3	%	special mention		37	%		81	%
Healthcare		55,615		2	%	pass/watch		0	%		74	%
Retail		36,458		1	%	pass/watch		8	%		66	%
Commercial		1,700		<1	%	doubtful		63	%		63	%

Total	$	2,652,538		100	%	pass/watch		4	%		73	%

	December 31, 2016

Multifamily	$	1,421,731	79	%	special mention	1	%	73	%
Self Storage		7,505	<1	%	special mention	0	%	70	%
Land		137,255	8	%	substandard	2	%	92	%
Office		141,711	8	%	pass/watch	43	%	73	%
Hotel		70,750	4	%	special mention	30	%	74	%
Healthcare		5,550	<1	%	special mention	0	%	63	%
Retail		3,958	<1	%	special mention	81	%	91	%
Commercial		1,700	<1	%	doubtful	63	%	63	%

Total	$	1,790,160	100	%	special mention	6	%	75	%

	December 31, 2017						Year Ended December 31, 2017

Asset Class	UPB		Carrying Value(1)		Allowance for Loan Losses		Average Recorded Investment(2)		Interest Income Recognized
Land	$	131,086	$	124,812	$	53,883	$	131,086	$	—
Hotel		34,750		34,750		5,700		34,750		371
Office		2,288		2,288		1,500		14,926		107
Commercial		1,700		1,700		1,700		1,700		—
Multifamily		—		—		—		1,271		22

Total	$	169,824	$	163,550	$	62,783	$	183,733	$	500

	December 31, 2016						Year Ended December 31, 2016

Land	$	131,086	$	125,926	$	53,883	$	129,277	$	—
Hotel		34,750		34,496		3,700		34,750		1,155
Office		27,563		22,778		21,973		27,572		94
Commercial		1,700		1,700		1,700		1,700		—
Multifamily		2,542		2,451		2,456		4,952		157

Total	$	197,641	$	187,351	$	83,712	$	198,251	$	1,406

	December 31, 2017						December 31, 2016

Asset Class	Carrying Value		Less Than 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Carrying Value		Less Than 90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
Hotel	$	34,750	$	—	$	34,750	$	—	$	—	$	—
Office		—		—		—		20,472		—		20,472
Multifamily		—		—		—		681		—		681
Commercial		1,700		—		1,700		1,700		—		1,700

Total	$	36,450	$	—	$	36,450	$	22,853	$	—	$	22,853

	Year Ended December 31, 2017

Asset Class	Number of Loans		Original UPB		Original Wtd. Avg. Rate of Interest			Extended UPB		Extended Wtd. Avg. Rate of Interest
Hotel		1	$	34,750		4.01	%	$	34,750		4.01	%



Multifamily	1	$	14,646	5.57	%	$	14,646	5.57	%
Office	1		2,315	4.03	%		2,315	4.03	%

Total	2	$	16,961	5.36	%	$	16,961	5.36	%

	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016

Fannie Mae	$	243,717		$	538,189
Freddie Mac		47,545			124,102
FHA		987			56

		292,249			662,347
Fair value of future MSR		5,806			13,146
Unearned discount		(612	)		(2,126	)

Loans held-for-sale, net	$	297,443		$	673,367

	Year Ended December 31, 2017									Year Ended December 31, 2016

	Acquired			Originated			Total			Acquired			Originated			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	194,800		$	32,943		$	227,743		$	—		$	—		$	—
Additions		1,199			86,700			87,899			221,647			33,597			255,244
Amortization		(37,470	)		(9,732	)		(47,202	)		(21,052	)		(653	)		(21,705	)
Write-downs and payoffs		(15,259	)		(573	)		(15,832	)		(5,795	)		(1	)		(5,796	)

Balance at end of period	$	143,270		$	109,338		$	252,608		$	194,800		$	32,943		$	227,743

Year	Amortization

2018	$	46,814
2019		43,191
2020		37,462
2021		30,037
2022		23,944
Thereafter		71,160

Total	$	252,608

	Investments in Equity Affiliates at

Equity Affiliates	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016		UPB of Loans to Equity Affiliates at December 31, 2017
Arbor Residential Investor LLC	$	19,193	$	28,917	$	—
West Shore Café		2,140		2,051		1,688
Lightstone Value Plus REIT L.P		1,895		1,895		—
JT Prime		425		425		—
East River Portfolio		—		83		—
Lexford Portfolio		—		—		—
Issuers of Junior Subordinated Notes		—		578		—

Total	$	23,653	$	33,949	$	1,688

	December 31, 2017									December 31, 2016

(in thousands)	Hotel Property			Office Building			Total			Hotel Property			Office Building			Total
Land	$	3,294		$	4,509		$	7,803		$	3,294		$	4,509		$	7,803
Building and intangible assets		30,699			2,010			32,709			30,474			1,563			32,037
Less: Impairment loss		(13,307	)		(500	)		(13,807	)		(11,200	)		—			(11,200	)
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(9,228	)		(690	)		(9,918	)		(8,659	)		(489	)		(9,148	)

Real estate owned, net	$	11,458		$	5,329		$	16,787		$	13,909		$	5,583		$	19,492

	Year Ended December 31, 2017		Year Ended December 31, 2016

Beginning balance	$	26,747	$	—
Additions from the Acquisition		—		26,747
Additions from internalization of management team(1)		25,000		—
Purchase price allocation adjustment(2)		4,879		—

Ending balance	$	56,626	$	26,747

	December 31, 2017							December 31, 2016

	Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization			Total		Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization			Total
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Broker relationships	$	25,000	$	(4,558	)	$	20,442	$	25,000	$	(1,432	)	$	23,568
Borrower relationships		14,400		(2,100	)		12,300		14,400		(660	)		13,740
Below market leases		4,010		(1,075	)		2,935		4,010		(337	)		3,673
Acquired technology		900		(437	)		463		900		(138	)		762
Infinite-lived intangible assets:
Fannie Mae DUS license		17,100		—			17,100		17,100		—			17,100
Freddie Mac Program Plus license		8,700		—			8,700		8,700		—			8,700
FHA license		3,200		—			3,200		3,200		—			3,200

	$	73,310	$	(8,170	)	$	65,140	$	73,310	$	(2,567	)	$	70,743

			Estimated Amortization Expense for the Years Ending December 31,

	Wtd. Avg. Remaining Life (in years)
	Wtd. Avg. Remaining Life (in years)		2018		2019		2020		2021		2022
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Broker relationships		6.5	$	3,125	$	3,125	$	3,125	$	3,125	$	3,125
Borrower relationships		8.5		1,440		1,440		1,440		1,440		1,440
Below market leases		5.4		737		737		684		126		126
Acquired technology		1.5		300		163		—		—		—

		7.1	$	5,602	$	5,465	$	5,249	$	4,691	$	4,691

								Collateral(3)

	Debt							Loans				Cash
	Face Value		Carrying Value(1)		Wtd. Avg. Rate(2)			UPB		Carrying Value		Restricted Cash(4)
*December 31, 2017*
CLO IX	$	356,400	$	351,042		2.97	%	$	372,350	$	371,236	$	88,650
CLO VIII		282,874		278,606		2.92	%		364,838		363,339		162
CLO VII		279,000		275,331		3.61	%		346,524		345,220		13,476
CLO VI		250,250		247,470		4.10	%		314,382		313,582		10,618
CLO V		267,750		265,973		4.06	%		347,797		346,803		2,203

Total CLOs	$	1,436,274	$	1,418,422		3.48	%	$	1,745,891	$	1,740,180	$	115,109



*December 31, 2016*
CLO VI	$	250,250	$	246,443		3.30	%	$	324,569	$	323,351	$	431
CLO V		267,750		264,864		3.26	%		344,680		343,748		5,320
CLO IV		219,000		217,134		3.06	%		291,319		290,429		8,681

Total CLOs	$	737,000	$	728,441		3.21	%	$	960,568	$	957,528	$	14,432

	Liability Component								Equity Component

Period	UPB		Unamortized Debt Discount		Unamortized Deferred Financing Fees		Net Carrying Value		Net Carrying Value
December 31, 2017	$	243,750	$	5,742	$	6,721	$	231,287	$	6,733



December 31, 2016	$	86,250	$	2,119	$	3,471	$	80,660	$	2,179

Cash Flow Triggers

*Overcollateralization(1)*
Current	130.72	%	129.87	%	129.03	%	129.03	%	134.68	%
Limit	129.72	%	128.87	%	128.03	%	128.03	%	133.68	%
Pass / Fail	Pass		Pass		Pass		Pass		Pass
*Interest Coverage(2)*
Current	214.53	%	249.66	%	245.32	%	322.10	%	264.20	%
Limit	120.00	%	120.00	%	120.00	%	120.00	%	120.00	%
Pass / Fail	Pass		Pass		Pass		Pass		Pass