DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC
DIRECTV FINANCING CO., INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (310) 964-5000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter. None.

The registrant has met the conditions set forth in General Instruction I (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSE OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF
THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain certain statements that we believe are, or may be considered to be, "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of various provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by use of statements that include phrases such as we "believe," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "foresee," "project" or other similar references to future periods. Examples of forward- looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make related to our business strategy and regarding our outlook for 2011 financial results, liquidity and capital resources.

Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. We caution you therefore against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include economic, business, competitive, national or global political, market and regulatory conditions and other risks, each of which is described in more detail in Item 1A—Risk Factors of this Annual Report.

Any forward looking statement made by us in this Annual Report on Form 10-K speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may occur and it is not possible for us to predict them all. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law.

DIRECTV Holdings LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of DIRECTV and consists of DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. We sometimes refer to DIRECTV Holdings LLC as DIRECTV Holdings, DIRECTV U.S, we or us and sometimes refer to DIRECTV as our Parent.

We provide over 19.2 million subscribers with access to hundreds of channels of digital-quality video entertainment and CD-quality audio programming that we transmit directly to subscribers' homes or businesses via high-powered geosynchronous satellites. We also provide video-on-demand, or VOD, via broadband to our subscribers who have connected their set-top receiver to their broadband service.

We believe we provide one of the most extensive collections of programming available in the MVPD industry, including over 160 national high-definition, or HD, television channels and four dedicated 3D channels. In addition, we offer VOD service, named DIRECTV CINEMA^TM, which provides a selection of over 6,000 movie and television programs to our broadband-connected subscribers. As of December 31, 2010, we provided local channel coverage in HD to markets covering over 95% of U.S. television households. In addition, we provided local channel coverage in standard definition to markets representing approximately 98% of U.S. television households.

We also provide premium professional and collegiate sports programming such as the NFL SUNDAY TICKET™ package, which allows subscribers to view the largest selection of NFL games

available each Sunday during the regular season. Under our contract with the NFL, we have exclusive rights to provide this service through the 2014 season, including rights to provide related broadband, HD, interactive and mobile services.

To subscribe to the DIRECTV® service, subscribers sign up for our service through us, our national retailers, independent satellite television retailers or dealers, or regional telephone companies, which we refer to as telcos. We or one of our home service providers or dealers install the receiving equipment. The receiving equipment consists of a small receiving satellite dish antenna, one or more digital set-top receivers, which are typically leased to the subscriber, and remote controls, which we refer to as a DIRECTV® System. After acquiring and installing a DIRECTV System, subscribers activate the DIRECTV service by contacting us and subscribing to one of our programming packages.

Our vision is to provide customers with the best video experience in the United States both inside and outside of the home by offering subscribers unique, differentiated and compelling programming through leadership in content, technology and customer service. Our strategy involves (1) strengthening our core business, (2) delivering the best "anytime, anywhere" experience—both inside and outside of the home, (3) building new revenue streams and (4) enhancing productivity.

Satellites. We currently have a fleet of twelve geosynchronous satellites, including eleven owned satellites and one leased satellite. We have seven Ku-Band satellites at the following orbital locations: 101° WL (three), 110° WL (one), 119° WL (one), 72.5° WL (one), and 95° WL (one-leased). We also have five Ka-Band satellites at our 99° WL (two) and 103° WL (three) orbital locations. The 72.5° WL orbital location is used pursuant to an arrangement with Telesat Canada and Bell ExpressVu.

We have contracted for the construction of an additional satellite to provide additional services as well as backup capacity, which we expect to launch and place into service in 2013.

Satellite Risk Management. At times, we use launch and in-orbit insurance to mitigate the potential financial impact of satellite fleet launch and in-orbit failures unless the premium costs are considered to be uneconomical relative to the risk of satellite failure. The insurance generally does not compensate for business interruption or loss of future revenues or subscribers. We rely on in-orbit spare satellites and excess transponder capacity at key orbital slots to mitigate the impact of a potential satellite failure on our ability to provide service. However, programming continuity cannot be assured in all instances or in the event of multiple satellite losses.

Launch insurance typically covers the time frame from ignition of the launch vehicle through separation of the satellite from the launch vehicle. In the past, we have launched satellites without

insurance. As of December 31, 2010, the net book value of our in-orbit satellites was $1,724 million, none of which is insured.

Digital Broadcast Centers. To gather programming content, ensure its digital quality, and transmit content to our satellites, we have built two digital broadcast centers, located in Castle Rock, Colorado and Los Angeles, California. These facilities provide the majority of our national and local standard-definition and HD programming. We have also built five uplink facilities which are used to provide HD local channels. Our broadcast centers receive programming from content providers via satellite, fiber optic cable and/or special tape. Most satellite-delivered programming is then digitized, encoded and transmitted to our satellites. We designed each broadcast center and uplink facility with redundant systems to minimize service interruptions.

Installation Network. The DIRECTV Home Service Provider, or HSP, network performs customer installation, upgrade, and service call work for us. From 2008 to 2010, we entered into several transactions that brought a significant portion of this HSP network activity in-house. We now directly employ nearly 5,000 technicians and utilize an additional 10,000 technicians from six outsourced companies around the United States. The combined workforce completed approximately 92% of all in-home visits in 2010. We set quality standards for all installation, upgrade, and service work, perform quality control procedures against those standards, manage network inventory levels, and monitor overall network performance for nearly all of the installation and service network.

Customer Service Centers. As of December 31, 2010, we utilized 36 customer service centers employing over 17,000 customer service representatives. Most of these customer service centers are operated by Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc., Alorica, Inc., Sitel Operating Corporation, N.E.W. Customer Service Companies, Inc., VXI Global Solutions, Inc. and Teleperformance. We currently own and operate six customer service centers located in: Boise, Idaho; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Huntsville, Alabama; Missoula, Montana; Huntington, West Virginia and Denver, Colorado that employ approximately 5,000 customer service representatives. Potential and existing subscribers can call a single telephone number 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to request assistance for hardware, programming, installation, technical and other support. We continue to increase the functionality of telephone-based and web-based self-care features in order to better manage customer service costs and improve service levels.

We face substantial competition in the MVPD industry and from emerging digital media distribution providers. Our competition includes companies that offer video, audio, interactive programming, telephony, data and other entertainment services, including cable television, other DTH companies, telcos, wireless companies and companies that are developing new technologies, including online video distributors, or OVDs. Many of our competitors have access to substantially greater financial and marketing resources. We believe our brand, the quality and variety of video, audio and interactive programming, quality of picture, access to service, availability of HD and DVR services, customer service and price are the key elements for attaining and retaining subscribers. Our over 19.2 million subscribers represent approximately 19% of MVPD subscribers at December 31, 2010.

We review our competitive position on an ongoing basis and, from time to time, consider various acquisitions, strategic alliances and divestitures, including potential wireless broadband investments or alliances, in order to continue to compete effectively, improve our financial results, grow our business and allocate our resources efficiently. We also consider periodically making equity investments in companies with which we can jointly provide services to our subscribers.

We are subject to government regulation in the United States, primarily by the FCC and, to a certain extent, by the legislative branches, other federal agencies and state and local authorities. We are also subject to the rules and procedures of the International Telecommunications Union, or ITU, a specialized agency of the United Nations within which governments and the private sector coordinate global telecommunications networks and services. Depending upon the circumstances, noncompliance with legislation or regulations promulgated by these entities could result in the suspension or revocation of our licenses or registrations, the termination or loss of contracts or the imposition of contractual damages, civil fines or criminal penalties.

This section sets forth a summary of regulatory issues pertaining to our operations in the United States and is not intended to describe all present and proposed government regulation and legislation affecting the MVPD industry or our business.

FCC Regulation Under the Communications Act and Related Acts. The Communications Act and other related acts give the FCC broad authority to regulate the operations of our company.

The ownership and operation of our DBS/DTH system is regulated by the FCC primarily for:

The FCC grants authorizations to satellite operators that meet its legal, technical and financial qualification requirements. The FCC conditions such authorizations on satisfaction of ongoing due diligence, construction, reporting and related obligations.

All of our satellites and earth stations are or have been licensed by the FCC. Currently, two of our satellites are licensed by the government of Canada. While the FCC generally issues DTH space station licenses for a fifteen-year term, DBS space station and earth station licenses are generally issued for a ten-year term, which is less than the useful life of a healthy direct broadcast satellite. Upon expiration of the initial license term, the FCC has the option to renew a satellite operator's license or authorize an operator to operate for a period of time on special temporary authority, or decline to renew the license. If the FCC declines to renew the operator's license, the operator is required to cease operations and the frequencies it was previously authorized to use would revert to the FCC.

Currently, we have several applications pending before the FCC, including applications to launch and operate future satellites to support DIRECTV's services. In general, the FCC's approval of these applications is required for us to continue to expand our range of service offerings while increasing the robustness of our satellite fleet. We may not obtain these approvals in a timely fashion or at all.

As a DBS/DTH licensee and operator we are subject to a variety of Communications Act requirements, FCC regulations and copyright laws that could materially affect our business. They include the following:

International Telecommunications Union Rules. We are required by international rules to coordinate the use of the frequencies on our satellites with other satellite operators who may interfere with us or who may suffer interference from our operations.

Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements. DBS/DTH providers are subject to other federal and state regulatory requirements, such as Federal Trade Commission, FCC and state telemarketing and advertising rules, and subscriber privacy rules similar to those governing other MVPDs. We have agreed with the Federal Trade Commission to (1) review and monitor compliance with telemarketing laws by any companies we authorize to do telemarketing as well as by independent retailers, (2) investigate and respond to complaints about alleged improper telemarketing and (3) terminate our relationship with marketers or retailers found in violation. Similarly, we have agreed with certain state attorneys general to comply with advertising disclosure requirements and monitor compliance by independent retailers.

In addition, although Congress has granted the FCC exclusive jurisdiction over the provision of DTH satellite services, aspects of DBS/DTH service remain regulated at the state and local level. For example, the FCC has promulgated rules prohibiting restrictions by local government agencies, such as zoning commissions and private organizations, such as homeowners associations, on the placement of DBS receiving antennas. Local governments and homeowners associations, however, may continue to regulate the placement of such antennas if necessary to accomplish a clearly defined public safety objective or to preserve a recognized historic district, and may also apply to the FCC for a waiver of FCC rules if there are other local concerns of a special or unusual nature. In addition, a number of state and local governments have attempted to impose consumer protection, customer service and other types of regulation on DBS operators. Also, while Congress has prohibited local taxation of the provision of DBS service, taxation at the state level is permissible, and many states have imposed such taxes, and additional states have attempted to do so recently. Incident to conducting a consumer directed business, we occasionally receive inquiries or complaints from authorities such as state attorneys general and state consumer protection offices. These matters are generally resolved in the ordinary course of business, and DIRECTV recently agreed to implement a restitution program for consumers who send eligible complaints related to consumer protection practices.

All DIRECTV companies maintain active programs for identifying and protecting our important intellectual property. With the exception of certain patents and trademarks held by us and various

intellectual property licensed from third parties, DIRECTV Group owns all of the intellectual property for the benefit of the company and subsidiaries.

We believe that our growing portfolio of pending and issued patents are important assets. We presently hold over 2,000 issued patents worldwide relating to our past and present businesses, including over 500 patents developed by, or otherwise relating to our businesses. We hold a worldwide portfolio of over 1,150 trademarks related to the DIRECTV brand, the Cyclone Design and DIRECTV products and services. In particular, we hold trademark registrations relating to its business, including registrations of the primary "DIRECTV" and the DIRECTV Cyclone Design trademarks. In many instances, these trademarks are licensed royalty-free to third parties for use in support of our business. We actively protect our important patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights against unauthorized or improper use by third parties.

We are subject to the requirements of federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations. These include laws regulating air emissions, water discharge and universal and hazardous waste management activities. We have an environmental management function designed to track, facilitate and support our compliance with these requirements and attempt to maintain compliance with all such requirements. We have made and will continue to make, as necessary, capital and other expenditures to comply with environmental requirements. We do not, however, expect capital or other expenditures for environmental compliance to be material in 2011. In addition, we periodically review environmental stewardship concepts (such as green initiatives and energy conservation strategies) and implement these whenever feasible. Environmental requirements are complex, change frequently and have become more stringent over time. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance that these requirements will not change or become more stringent in the future in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are also subject to environmental laws requiring the investigation and cleanup of environmental contamination at facilities we formerly owned or operated or currently own or operate or to which we sent hazardous wastes, including specified universal wastes, for treatment, service, disposal or recycling. We are aware of contamination at one of our former sites. We are in the process of complying with the requirements stipulated by the government agency overseeing the site cleanup and have allocated the funds to achieve the decontamination goals.

As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately 16,000 full-time and 300 part-time employees.

You should carefully consider the following risk factors. The risks described below are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business, financial conditions or results of operations.

Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by the following:

We compete with other MVPDs, some of whom have greater resources than we do and levels of competition are increasing.

We compete in the MVPD industry against cable television, telcos, and wireless companies and other land-based and satellite-based system operators with service offerings including video, audio and interactive programming, data and other entertainment services and telephony service. Some of these competitors have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do.

Some cable television operators have large, established customer bases and many cable operators have significant investments in, and access to, programming. According to the National Cable & Telecommunications Association's 2008 Industry Overview, 96% of the 128.6 million U.S. housing units are passed by cable. Of the 128.6 million U.S. housing units, approximately 97.6 million subscribe to an MVPD service and approximately 62% of MVPD subscribers receive their programming from a cable operator. Cable television operators have advantages relative to us, including or as a result of:

In addition, cable television operators have grown their subscriber bases through mergers and acquisitions, and a recent federal appeals court decision invalidating the cap on the number of subscribers a single cable operator may allow them additional avenues for growth. Moreover, mergers, joint ventures and alliances among franchise, wireless or private cable television operators, telcos, broadband service providers and others may result in providers capable of offering bundled television, data and telecommunications services in competition with our services.

We do not currently offer local channel coverage to markets covering approximately three percent of U.S. television households, which places us at a competitive disadvantage in those markets. We also have been unable to secure certain international programming, due to exclusive arrangements of programming providers with certain competitors, which has constrained our ability to compete for subscribers who wish to obtain such programming. And as discussed below, certain cable-affiliated programmers have withheld their programming from us in certain markets, which has further constrained our ability to compete for subscribers in those markets.

In the United States, various telcos and broadband service providers have deployed fiber optic lines directly to customers' homes or neighborhoods to deliver video services, which compete with the DIRECTV service. It is uncertain whether we will be able to increase our satellite capacity, offer a significant level of new services in existing markets in which we compete or expand to additional markets as may be necessary to compete effectively. Some of these various telcos and broadband service providers also sell the DIRECTV service as part of a bundle with their voice and data services. A new broadly-deployed network with the capability of providing video, voice and data services could present a significant competitive challenge and, in the case of the telcos currently selling the DIRECTV

service, could result in such companies focusing less effort and resources selling the DIRECTV service or declining to sell it at all. We may be unable to develop other distribution methods to make up for lost sales through the telcos.

As a result of these and other factors, we may not be able to continue to expand our subscriber base or compete effectively against cable television or other MVPD operators in the future.

Our business is focused on television, and we face emerging competition from other providers of digital media, some of which have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. In particular, programming offered over the Internet has become more prevalent as the speed and quality of broadband networks have improved. OVDs and providers such as Hulu, Roku, Netflix, Apple TV, Amazon and Google TV are aggressively working to establish themselves as an alternative provider of video services. Such services and the growing availability of online content, coupled with an expanding market for connected devices and internet-connected televisions, poses a potential competitive challenge to traditional MVPDs, as a number of consumers may decide to drop their traditional MVPD subscription package.

Significant changes in consumer behavior with regard to the means by which they obtain video entertainment and information in response to this emerging digital media competition could materially adversely affect our revenues and earnings or otherwise disrupt our business.

We depend on others to produce programming and programming costs are increasing.

Almost all of our programming is provided by unaffiliated third parties. Typically our programming agreements are multiple-year agreements and contain annual price increases. When negotiating to acquire rights to new programming, or for renewal of expiring contracts, programming suppliers have historically increased the rates they charge us for programming, increasing our costs. Often these increases are greater than the rate of inflation for the same period. We expect this practice to continue and the negotiations over such increases to become more difficult and potentially disruptive. Increases in programming costs, including retransmission costs for broadcast programming, could cause us to increase the rates that we charge our subscribers, which could in turn, especially in a difficult economic environment, cause subscribers to terminate their subscriptions or potential new subscribers to refrain from subscribing to our service. Furthermore, due to the economy and other factors, we may be unable to pass programming cost increases on to our subscribers. Alternatively, in order to attempt to mitigate the effect of proposed programming price increases, we may refuse to carry certain channels, which could adversely affect subscriber growth or result in higher churn.

In addition, a limited number of cable-affiliated programmers have in the past denied us access to their programming. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to continue to obtain desirable programming and deliver it to our subscribers at competitive prices. We may not be able to renew these agreements on favorable terms, or at all, or these agreements may be canceled prior to expiration of their original terms. If we are unable to renew any of these agreements or the other parties cancel the agreements, we may not be able to obtain substitute programming, or if we are able to obtain such substitute programming, it may not be comparable in quality or cost to our existing programming.

If we are unable to obtain rights to programming or are unable to pass additional costs on to subscribers, the potential loss of subscribers and the need to absorb some or all of the additional costs could have a material adverse effect on our earnings or cash flow.

A National Football League strike or lockout in 2011 could materially adversely affect our cash flows.

We have a contract with the National Football League for the exclusive rights to distribute the NFL Sunday Ticket Package to our subscribers. The NFL's collective bargaining agreement with its players expires before the beginning of the 2011-2012 NFL season. If there is a players' strike or an owners' lockout and no games are played or a reduced schedule is played, we would still be obligated to make certain contractual payments to the NFL for such season. Our subscriber revenues would decrease if NFL games are not played or a full season is lost and cash flows from operating activities would decrease from lower revenues because we would still be obligated to make certain contractual payments to the NFL. We will be able to partially offset these payments through provisions such as credits in the following year, reimbursements for games not played and its rights to an extra season if an entire season were cancelled, but in the near term a strike or lockout could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows from operating activities primarily due to payments we may have to make to the NFL, including minimum contractual obligations, an optional advance payment that may be requested by the NFL and the loss of subscriber revenue, as well as possibly resulting in reduced subscriber additions and higher churn.

Increased subscriber churn or subscriber upgrade and retention costs could materially adversely affect our financial performance.

Turnover of subscribers in the form of subscriber service cancellations, or churn, has a significant financial impact on the results of operations of any subscription television provider, including us, as does the cost of upgrading and retaining subscribers. Any increase in our upgrade and retention costs for our existing subscribers or increased retransmission fees paid to broadcasters may adversely affect our financial performance or cause us to increase our subscription rates, which could increase churn. Churn may also increase due to factors beyond our control, including churn by subscribers who are unable to pay their monthly subscription fees, a slowing economy, significant signal theft, consumer fraud, a maturing subscriber base and competitive offers. Any of the risks described in this Annual Report that could potentially have a material adverse impact on our cost or service quality or that could result in higher prices for our subscribers could also, in turn, cause an increase in churn and consequently have a material adverse effect on our earnings and financial performance.

We incur costs relating to subscribers acquired by us and subscribers acquired through third parties. These costs are known as subscriber acquisition costs. For instance, we provide installation incentives to our retailers to enable them to offer standard professional installation as part of the subscriber's purchase or lease of a DIRECTV System. In addition, we pay commissions to retailers for their efforts in offering a DIRECTV System at a lower cost to consumers. Our subscriber acquisition costs may materially increase, to the extent we offer more costly advanced equipment or services, including connecting our receivers to the customers broadband service, continue or expand current sales promotion activities or introduce other more aggressive promotions, or due to increased competition. Any material increase in subscriber acquisition costs from current levels would negatively impact our earnings and could materially adversely affect our financial performance.

Results are impacted by the effect of, and changes in, United States economic conditions and weakening economic conditions may reduce subscriber spending and our rate of growth of subscriber additions and may increase subscriber churn.

Our business may be affected by factors in the United States that are beyond our control, such as downturns in economic activity, or in the MVPD industry. Factors such as interest rates and the health

of the housing market may impact our business. A substantial portion of our revenues comes from residential customers whose spending patterns may be affected by prevailing economic conditions. Our market share in multiple dwelling units such as apartment buildings is lower than that of many of our competitors. If unemployment and foreclosures of single family residences increase, our earnings and financial performance could be negatively affected more than those of our competitors. In addition, if our customers seek alternative means to obtain video entertainment, they may choose to purchase fewer services from us. Due to the economic and competitive environment, we may need to spend more, or we may provide greater discounts or credits, to acquire and retain customers who in turn spend less on our services. If our ARPU decreases or does not increase commensurate with increases in programming or other costs, our margins could become compressed and the long term value of a customer would then decrease. The weak economy may affect our net subscriber additions and reduce subscriber spending and, if these economic conditions continue or deteriorate further, our subscriber growth could decline and our churn rate could increase which would have a material adverse effect on our earnings and financial performance.

In the video industry, changes occur rapidly as new technologies are developed, which could cause our services and products that deliver our services to become obsolete. We may not be able to keep pace with technological developments. If the new technologies on which we intend to focus our investments fail to achieve acceptance in the marketplace or our technology does not work and requires significant cost to replace or fix, we could suffer a material adverse effect on our future competitive position, which could cause a reduction in our revenues and earnings. For example, our competitors could be the first to obtain proprietary technologies that are perceived by the market as being superior. Further, after incurring substantial costs, one or more of the technologies under development by us or any of our strategic partners could become obsolete prior to its introduction.

In addition, technological innovation depends, to a significant extent, on the work of technically skilled employees. Competition for the services of these employees has been vigorous. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to attract and retain these employees.

To access technologies and provide products that are necessary for us to remain competitive, particularly in the area of broadband services, we may make future acquisitions and investments and may enter into strategic partnerships with other companies. Such investments may require a commitment of significant capital and human and other resources. The value of such acquisitions, investments and partnerships and the technology accessed may be highly speculative. Arrangements with third parties can lead to contractual and other disputes and dependence on the development and delivery of necessary technology on third parties that we may not be able to control or influence. These relationships may commit us to technologies that are rendered obsolete by other developments or preclude the pursuit of other technologies which may prove to be superior.

Our business relies on intellectual property, some of which is owned by third parties, and we may inadvertently infringe patents and proprietary rights of others.

Many entities, including some of our competitors, have or may in the future obtain patents and other intellectual property rights that cover or affect products or services related to those that we currently offer or may offer in the future. In general, if a court determines that one or more of our services or the products used to transmit or receive our services infringes on intellectual property owned by others, we and the applicable manufacturers or vendors may be required to cease developing or marketing those services and products, to obtain licenses from the owners of the intellectual property or to redesign those services and products in such a way as to avoid infringing the intellectual

property rights. If a third party holds intellectual property rights, it may not allow us or the applicable manufacturers to use its intellectual property at any price, which could materially adversely affect our competitive position.

We may not be aware of all intellectual property rights that our services or the products used to transmit or receive our services may potentially infringe. In addition, patent applications in the United States are generally confidential until the Patent and Trademark Office issues a patent. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the extent to which our services or the products used to transmit or receive our services may infringe claims contained in pending patent applications. Further, without lengthy litigation, it is often not possible to determine definitively whether a claim of infringement is valid.

We cannot estimate the extent to which we may be required in the future to obtain intellectual property licenses or the availability and cost of any such licenses. Those costs, and their impact on our earnings, could be material. Damages in patent infringement cases may also include treble damages in certain circumstances. To the extent that we are required to pay royalties to third parties to whom we are not currently making payments, these increased costs of doing business could materially adversely affect our operating results. We are currently being sued in patent infringement actions related to use of technologies in our DTH business. There can be no assurance that the courts will conclude that our services or the products used to transmit or receive our services do not infringe on the rights of third parties, that we or the manufacturers would be able to obtain licenses from these persons on commercially reasonable terms or, if we were unable to obtain such licenses, that we or the manufacturers would be able to redesign our services or the products used to transmit or receive our services to avoid infringement. The final disposition of these claims is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, but could possibly be material to our consolidated results of operations for any one period. Further, no assurance can be given that any adverse outcome would not be material to our consolidated financial position.

See "Legal Proceedings—Intellectual Property Litigation" in Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report.

We believe that our future success will depend to a significant extent upon the performance of certain of our key executives. The loss of certain of our key executives could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Construction or launch delays on satellites could materially adversely affect our revenues and earnings.

A key component of our business strategy is our ability to expand our offering of new programming and services, including increased local and HD programming. In order to accomplish this goal, we need to construct and launch new satellites. The construction and launch of satellites are often subject to delays, including satellite and launch vehicle construction delays, periodic unavailability of reliable launch opportunities due to competition for launch slots, weather and also due to general delays that result when a launch provider experiences a launch failure, and delays in obtaining regulatory approvals. A significant delay in the future delivery of any satellite would materially adversely affect the use of the satellite and thus could materially adversely affect our anticipated revenues and earnings. If satellite construction schedules are not met, there can be no assurance that a launch opportunity will be available at the time a satellite is ready to be launched. Certain delays in satellite construction could also jeopardize a satellite authorization that is conditioned on timely construction and launch of the satellite.

Satellites are subject to significant operational risks relating to launch and while in orbit. Launch and operational risks include launch failure, incorrect orbital placement or improper commercial operation. Launch failures result in significant delays in the deployment of satellites because of the need both to construct replacement satellites, which can take up to 36 months, and obtain other launch opportunities. We estimate the overall historical loss rate for all launches of commercial satellites in the last seven years to be approximately five percent but it may be higher. Any significant delays or failures in successfully launching and deploying our satellites could materially adversely affect our ability to generate revenues. While we have traditionally purchased insurance covering the launch and, in limited cases, operation of our satellites, such policies typically cover the loss of the satellite itself or a portion thereof, and not the business interruption or other associated direct and indirect costs. For example, we purchased launch insurance covering a portion of our DIRECTV 12 satellite, which we launched at the end of 2009, and launch vehicle costs in the event of a total loss of the satellite prior to separation from the launch vehicle, but did not purchase in-orbit insurance for it.

In-orbit risks include malfunctions, commonly referred to as anomalies, and collisions with meteoroids, other spacecraft or other space debris. Anomalies occur as a result of various factors, such as satellite manufacturing errors, problems with the power systems or control systems of the satellites and general failures resulting from operating satellites in the harsh space environment. We work closely with our satellite manufacturers to determine and eliminate the potential causes of anomalies in new satellites and provide for redundancies of critical components in the satellites as well as having backup satellite capacity. However, we cannot assure you that we will not experience anomalies in the future, nor can we assure you that our backup satellite capacity will be sufficient for our business purposes. Any single anomaly or series of anomalies could materially adversely affect our operations and revenues and our relationships with our subscribers, as well as our ability to attract new subscribers for our services. Anomalies may also reduce the expected useful life of a satellite, thereby creating additional expenses due to the need to provide replacement or backup satellites and potentially reducing revenues if service is interrupted. Finally, the occurrence of anomalies may materially adversely affect our ability to insure our satellites at commercially reasonable premiums, if at all. While some anomalies are currently covered by existing insurance policies, others are not now covered or may not be covered in the future.

Any single anomaly or series of anomalies could materially adversely affect our operations and revenues and our relationships with our subscribers, as well as our ability to attract new subscribers for our services. Anomalies may also reduce the expected useful life of a satellite, thereby creating additional expenses due to the need to provide replacement or backup satellites and potentially reducing revenues if service is interrupted. Finally, the occurrence of anomalies may materially adversely affect our ability to insure our satellites at commercially reasonable premiums, if at all. While some anomalies are currently covered by existing insurance policies, others are not now covered or may not be covered in the future.

Our ability to earn revenue also depends on the usefulness of our satellites. Each satellite has a limited useful life. A number of factors affect the useful life of a satellite, including, among other things:

Generally, the minimum design life of the satellites in our fleet is between 12 and 16 years. The actual useful lives of the satellites may be shorter or longer, in some cases significantly. Our operating results could be adversely affected if the useful life of any of our satellites were significantly shorter than 12 years from the date of launch.

In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may relocate another satellite and use it as a replacement for the failed or lost satellite. In the event of a complete satellite failure, our services provided via that satellite could be unavailable for several days or longer while backup in-orbit satellites are repositioned and services are moved. We are not insured for any resultant lost revenues. The use of backup satellite capacity for our programming may require us to discontinue some programming services due to potentially reduced capacity on the backup satellite. Any relocation of our satellites would require prior FCC approval and, among other things, a demonstration to the FCC that the replacement satellite would not cause additional interference compared to the failed or lost satellite. Such FCC approval may not be obtained. We believe we have or will have in 2011, in-orbit satellite capacity to expeditiously recover transmission of most our programming in the event one of our in-orbit satellites fails. However, programming continuity cannot be assured in the event of multiple satellite losses.

The loss of a satellite that is not insured could materially adversely affect our earnings.

Any launch vehicle failure, or loss or destruction of any of our satellites, even if insured, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, our ability to comply with FCC regulatory obligations and our ability to fund the construction or acquisition of replacement satellites in a timely fashion, or at all. At December 31, 2010, the net book value of in-orbit satellites was $1,724 million, none of which was insured.

We depend on the Communications Act for access to cable-affiliated programming and changes impacting that access could materially adversely affect us.

We purchase a substantial percentage of our programming from programmers that are affiliated with cable system operators, including key regional sports networks, or RSNs. Currently, under certain provisions of the Communications Act governing access to programming, cable-affiliated programmers generally must sell and deliver their programming services to all MVPDs on non-discriminatory terms and conditions. The Communications Act and the FCC rules also prohibit certain types of exclusive programming contracts involving programming from cable-affiliated programmers.

Any change in the Communications Act or the FCC's rules that would permit programmers that are affiliated with cable system operators to refuse to provide such programming or to impose discriminatory terms or conditions could materially adversely affect our ability to acquire programming on a cost-effective basis, or at all. The Communications Act prohibitions on certain cable industry exclusive contracting practices with cable-affiliated programmers were extended by the FCC through October 2012, though it is currently considering proposals that could shorten the term of this extension if a cable operator could show that competition from new entrant MVPDs had reached a sufficient penetration level in the relevant marketing area.

In addition, certain cable providers have denied us and other MVPDs access to a limited number of channels created by programmers with which the cable providers are affiliated. In other cases, such

programmers have denied MVPDs high definition feeds of such programming. The cable providers have asserted that they are not required to provide such programming (or resolution) due to the manner in which that programming is distributed, which they argue is not covered by the program access provisions of the Communications Act. The FCC recently adopted new rules under which such programming would also be subject to certain non-exclusivity and non-discrimination requirements. These rules have been challenged in court, however. In addition, they will require a further evidentiary showing by an MVPD seeking access to such programming. If these new rules are successfully challenged in court or we cannot make the required evidentiary showing, we may continue to be precluded from obtaining such programming, which in turn could materially adversely affect our ability to compete in regions serviced by those cable providers. Although the FCC also addressed some of these issues in a limited fashion by placing access conditions on certain regional sports networks affiliated with Time Warner Cable, Inc. and Comcast Corporation, as well as placing various program access conditions relating to Comcast Corporation's acquisition of control of NBC Universal, it is not clear that we will be able to assure continued access to this programming on fair and nondiscriminatory terms.

Our parent is subject to similar restrictions with respect to certain programmers affiliated with us. The FCC imposed a number of conditions on its approval of Liberty Media's acquisition of News Corporation's interest in our parent in 2007 which continues to apply. Among other things, those conditions require our parent to offer national and regional programming services it controls to all MVPDs on non-exclusive and non-discriminatory terms and conditions, and prohibits our parent from entering into exclusive arrangements with affiliated programmers or unduly influencing such programmers in their dealings with other MVPDs. The conditions also require our parent to engage in "baseball style" arbitration if elected by an MVPD where the parties cannot agree on terms and conditions for carriage of RSN programming owned, managed or controlled by our parent. This condition continues to apply to the three RSNs our parent acquired from Liberty Media in 2009.

Changes to and implementation of statutory copyright license requirements may negatively affect our ability to deliver local and distant broadcast stations, as well as other aspects of our business.

We carry the signals of distant broadcast stations pursuant to statutory copyright licenses contained in SHVA.

SHVA, related laws, and FCC implementing rules also govern our provision of local broadcast signals. STELA itself directed a number of federal agencies and bodies to conduct proceedings to evaluate the possibility of significant changes to these laws. Such changes could limit our ability to deliver local broadcast signals. More generally, we have limited capacity, and the projected number of markets in which we can deliver local broadcast programming will continue to be constrained because of the statutory "carry-one, carry-all" requirement and may be reduced depending on changes to that requirement, the FCC's interpretation of its rules in pending and future rulemaking and complaint proceedings, as well as judicial decisions interpreting must carry requirements. We may not be able to comply with these must carry rules, or compliance may mean that we are not able to use capacity that could otherwise be used for new or additional local or national programming services. In addition, the FCC has issued an increasing obligation for carriage of local digital broadcast transmissions in HD format. We may be unable to comply with this requirement in markets where we currently carry such signals without ceasing HD local service entirely in some markets, and would be precluded from launching additional markets currently planned.

In addition, the FCC has adopted rules requiring us to negotiate in good faith with broadcast stations seeking carriage outside of the mandatory carriage regime described elsewhere. The rules for "retransmission consent" negotiations, which are similar to those that have applied to broadcast

stations for years, require us to comply with certain indicia of good faith negotiation, as well as to demonstrate good faith under a "totality of the circumstances" test. Failure to comply with these rules could subject us to administrative sanctions and other penalties. Moreover, the FCC is considering changes to these and other rules related to retransmission consent, some of which could make negotiations more difficult, increase fees charged by broadcasters for carriage, or result in the increased withholding of broadcast signals.

Satellite programming signals have been stolen and may be stolen in the future, which could result in lost revenues and would cause us to incur incremental operating costs that do not result in subscriber acquisition.

The delivery of subscription programming requires the use of conditional access technology to limit access to programming to only those who subscribe and are authorized to view it. The conditional access system uses, among other things, encryption technology to protect the transmitted signal from unauthorized access. It is illegal to create, sell or otherwise distribute software or devices to circumvent that conditional access technology. However, theft of cable and satellite programming has been widely reported, and the access cards used in our conditional access system have been compromised in the past and could be compromised in the future.

We have undertaken various initiatives with respect to our conditional access system to further enhance the security of the DIRECTV signal. To help combat signal theft, we provide our subscribers with more advanced access cards that we believe significantly enhance the security of our signal. Currently, we believe these access cards have not been compromised. However, we cannot guarantee that those advanced access cards will prevent the theft of our satellite programming signals in the future. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will succeed in developing the technology we need to effectively restrict or eliminate signal theft. If our current access cards are compromised, our revenue and our ability to contract for video and audio services provided by programmers could be materially adversely affected. In addition, our operating costs could increase if we attempt to implement additional measures to combat signal theft.

The ability to maintain FCC licenses and other regulatory approvals is critical to our business.

If we do not obtain all requisite U.S. regulatory approvals for the construction, launch and operation of any of our existing or future satellites for the use of frequencies at the orbital locations planned for these satellites or for the provision of service, or the licenses obtained impose operational restrictions on us, our ability to generate revenue and profits could be materially adversely affected. In addition, under certain circumstances, existing licenses are subject to revocation or modification and upon expiration, renewal may not be granted. If existing licenses are not renewed, or are revoked or materially modified, our ability to generate revenue could be materially adversely affected.

In certain cases, satellite system operators are obligated by governmental regulation and procedures of the International Telecommunications Union to coordinate the operation of their systems with other users of the radio spectrum in order to avoid causing interference to those other users. Coordination may require a satellite system operator to reduce power, avoid operating on certain frequencies, relocate its satellite to another orbital location and/or otherwise modify planned or existing operations. For example, the FCC has conditionally granted Spectrum Five authority to provide direct broadcast satellite service using frequencies assigned to it by the Government of the Netherlands from an orbital slot located halfway between slots at which we currently operate. Other operators have filed similar requests. We believe this closer proximity, if ultimately implemented, would significantly increase the risk of interference which could adversely affect the quality of service provided to our subscribers. We may not be able to successfully coordinate our satellites to the extent we are required

to do so, and any modifications we make in the course of coordination, or any inability to successfully coordinate, may materially adversely affect our ability to generate revenue. In addition, the FCC is currently conducting a rulemaking proceeding to consider, among other things, the adoption of operating parameters under which such "tweener" systems would be automatically deemed coordinated.

All of our FCC satellite authorizations are subject to conditions imposed by the FCC in addition to the FCC's general authority to modify, cancel or revoke those authorizations. Use of FCC licenses and other authorizations are often subject to conditions, including technical requirements and implementation deadlines. Failure to comply with such requirements, or comply in a timely manner, could lead to the loss of authorizations and could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenue. For example, loss of an authorization could potentially reduce the amount of programming and other services available to our subscribers. The materiality of such a loss of authorization would vary based upon, among other things, the orbital location at which the frequencies may be used.

Moreover, some of our authorizations and future applications may be subject to petitions and oppositions, and there can be no assurance that our authorizations will not be canceled, revoked or modified or that our applications will not be denied. Moreover, the FCC has adopted new rules for licensing satellites that may limit our ability to file applications and secure licenses in the future.

Congress has continued to shape the scope of the FCC's regulatory authority and enact legislation that affects our business. In addition, FCC proceedings to implement legislation and enact additional regulations are ongoing. The outcomes of these legislative or regulatory proceedings or their effect on our business cannot be predicted.

We have debt totaling $10,472 million as of December 31, 2010. If we do not have sufficient income or other sources of cash, it could affect our ability to service debt and pay other obligations.

We may not be able to obtain or retain certain foreign regulatory approvals.

There can be no assurance that any current regulatory approvals held by us are, or will remain, sufficient in the view of foreign regulatory authorities, or that any additional necessary approvals will be granted on a timely basis or at all, in all jurisdictions in which we operate, or that applicable restrictions in those jurisdictions will not be unduly burdensome. The failure to obtain the

authorizations necessary to operate satellites or provide satellite service internationally could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenue and our overall competitive position.

Our Parent may have a significant indemnity obligation to Liberty Media, which is not limited in amount or subject to any cap, if parts of the Liberty Transaction or Liberty's 2008 Transaction with News Corporation are treated as a taxable transaction.

Despite obtaining a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") and an opinion of legal counsel to the effect that parts of the Liberty Transaction qualified as a tax-free distribution for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the continuing validity of such ruling and opinion is subject to the accuracy of factual representations and certain assumptions. Any inaccuracy in such representations could invalidate the ruling, and failure to comply with any undertakings made in connection with such tax opinion could alter the conclusions reached in such opinion. Even if parts of the Liberty Transaction otherwise qualify for tax-free treatment, it would result in a significant U.S. federal income tax liability to Liberty Media if one or more persons acquire a 50% or greater interest in the DIRECTV common stock as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the Liberty Transaction. The process for determining whether an acquisition is part of a plan under these rules is complex, inherently factual and subject to interpretation of the facts and circumstances of a particular case. Liberty Media or our Parent might inadvertently cause or permit a prohibited change in the ownership of our Parent to occur, thereby triggering a tax liability to Liberty Media.

In addition, Liberty Media entered into a tax matters agreement with News Corporation in connection with its 2008 transaction with News Corporation, pursuant to which Liberty Media agreed, among other things, to indemnify News Corporation and certain related persons for taxes resulting from actions taken by Liberty Media or its affiliates that cause such transaction (or related restructuring transactions) not to qualify as tax-free transactions. Liberty Media's indemnification obligations to News Corporation and certain related persons are not limited in amount or subject to any cap.

Under a Tax Sharing Agreement between Liberty Media and our Parent, in certain circumstances our Parent is obligated to indemnify Liberty Media and certain related persons for any losses and taxes resulting from the failure of the Liberty Transaction to be tax-free transactions and from any losses resulting from Liberty Media's indemnity obligations to News Corporation under the tax matters agreement between News Corporation and Liberty Media. If our Parent is required to indemnify Liberty Media or certain related persons under the circumstances set forth in the Tax Sharing Agreement, we may be subject to substantial liabilities not limited in amount or subject to any cap. In such a circumstance, we may be required to make payments or dividends to satisfy such liabilities that could either breach covenants in our credit facilities and bond indentures or require additional or accelerated payments, which could materially adversely affect our financial position and short term operating results.

We may be required to forgo certain transactions in order to avoid the risk of incurring significant tax-related liabilities.

We might be required to forgo certain transactions that might have otherwise been advantageous in order to preserve the tax-free treatment of the Liberty Transaction. In particular, we might be required to forgo certain transactions, including asset dispositions or other strategic transactions for some period of time following the Liberty Transaction so as not to trigger any liability under the tax indemnification obligations.

We rely on network and information systems and other technology, and a disruption or failure of such networks, systems or technology as a result of, misappropriation of data or other malfeasance, as well as outages, natural disasters, accidental releases of information or similar events, may disrupt our business.

Because network and information systems and other technologies are critical to our operating activities, network or information system shutdowns caused by events such as computer hacking, dissemination of computer viruses, worms and other destructive or disruptive software, and other malicious activity, as well as power outages, natural disasters such as earthquakes, terrorist attacks and similar events, pose increasing risks. Such an event could have an adverse impact on us and our customers, including degradation of service, service disruption, excessive call volume to call centers and damage to our broadcast centers, other properties, equipment and data. Such an event also could result in large expenditures necessary to repair or replace such networks or information systems or to protect them from similar events in the future. Significant incidents could result in a disruption of our operations, customer dissatisfaction, or a loss of customers or revenues.

Furthermore, our operating activities could be subject to risks caused by misappropriation, misuse, leakage, falsification and accidental release or loss of information maintained in our information technology systems and networks, including customer, personnel and vendor data. We could be exposed to significant costs if such risks were to materialize, and such events could damage our reputation and credibility and have a negative impact on our revenues. We also could be required to expend significant capital and other resources to remedy any such security breach. As a result of the increasing awareness concerning the importance of safeguarding personal information, the potential misuse of such information and legislation that has been adopted or is being considered regarding the protection, privacy and security of personal information, information-related risks are increasing, particularly for businesses like ours that handle a large amount of personal customer data.

We are involved in various legal proceedings, including those arising in the ordinary course of business, such as consumer class actions and those described under the caption "Legal Proceedings" in Part I, Item 3 incorporated by reference herein. Such matters include investigations and legal actions by the Federal Trade Commission where regulators may seek monetary damages and may also seek to require or prohibit certain actions by us with regard to our current or potential customers. While we do not believe that any of these proceedings alone or in the aggregate will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters or the imposition of conditions by regulators on the conduct of our business could be material to our consolidated results of operations and cash flows for any one period. Further, no assurance can be given that any adverse outcome would not be material to our consolidated financial position.

We may face other risks described from time to time in periodic reports filed by us with the SEC.

We urge you to consider the above risk factors carefully in evaluating forward- looking statements contained in this Annual Report. The forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report are made only as of the date of this Annual Report and we undertake no obligation to publicly update these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately 220 owned and leased locations operating in the United States. The major locations include eight administrative offices, two broadcast centers and six call centers.

(a) Material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which we became or were a party during the year ended December 31, 2010 or subsequent thereto, but before the filing of the report, are summarized below:

Intellectual Property Litigation. We are a defendant in several unrelated lawsuits claiming infringement of various patents relating to various aspects of our businesses. In certain of these cases other industry participants are also defendants, and also in certain of these cases we expect that any potential liability would be the responsibility of our equipment vendors pursuant to applicable contractual indemnification provisions. To the extent that the allegations in these lawsuits can be analyzed by us at this stage of their proceedings, we believe the claims are without merit and intend to defend the actions vigorously. The final disposition of these claims is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, but could possibly be material to our consolidated results of operations of any one period. No assurance can be given that any adverse outcome would not be material to our consolidated financial position.

Early Cancellation Fees. In 2008, a number of plaintiffs filed putative class action lawsuits in state and federal courts challenging the early cancellation fees we assess our customers when they do not fulfill their programming commitments. Several of these lawsuits are pending—some in California state court purporting to represent statewide classes, and some in federal courts purporting to represent nationwide classes. The lawsuits seek both monetary and injunctive relief. While the theories of liability vary, the lawsuits generally challenge these fees under state consumer protection laws as both unfair and inadequately disclosed to customers. Each of the lawsuits is at an early stage. Where possible, we are moving to compel these cases to arbitration in accordance with our Customer Agreement, but in states such as California where the enforceability of the arbitration provision is limited, we intend to defend against these allegations in court. We believe that our early cancellation fees are adequately disclosed, and represent reasonable estimates of the costs we incur when customers cancel service before fulfilling their programming commitments.

From time to time, we receive investigative inquiries or subpoenas from state and federal authorities with respect to alleged violations of state and federal statutes. These inquiries may lead to legal proceedings in some cases. We have received a request for information from the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, on issues similar to those resolved with the multistate group of state attorneys general discussed in (b) below. We are cooperating with the FTC by providing information about our sales and marketing practices and customer complaints.

Other. We are subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. The amount of ultimate liability with respect to such actions is not expected to materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

(b) The following previously reported legal proceedings were terminated during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2010:

In December 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement with a multistate group of state attorneys general to resolve concerns regarding alleged violations of their respective state consumer protection statutes. The state of Washington, originally a part of the multistate group, filed an action in Washington state court in December 2009, and that litigation was settled on the same substantive terms as reached with the multistate group. We did not admit any wrongdoing in entering into the settlement. We agreed to formalize many business improvements made in the last few years and to further improve other practices. We paid a total of $14.25 million to the states as costs of investigation and attorneys fees, and has agreed to implement a restitution program for consumers who send eligible complaints.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

All of DIRECTV Holdings LLC's equity is indirectly owned by DIRECTV. All of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc.'s common equity is owned by DIRECTV Holdings LLC. There is no established public trading market for our equity. Dividends on equity will be paid when and if declared by our Boards of Directors. None of our equity is subject to outstanding options or warrants.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSE OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

The following is a discussion of our results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Information in this section is organized as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,

	2010			2009			2008
	(Dollars in Millions)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues	$	20,268		$	18,671		$	17,310
Total operating costs and expenses		16,978			16,261			14,980

Operating profit		3,290			2,410			2,330
Interest income		5			4			37
Interest expense		(488	)		(348	)		(315	)
Other, net		(5	)		(17	)		5

Income before income taxes		2,802			2,049			2,057
Income tax expense		(1,051	)		(794	)		(807	)

Net income	$	1,751		$	1,255		$	1,250

	Years Ended December 31,

	2010			2009			2008
	(Dollars in Millions)
Other Data:
Operating profit before depreciation and amortization⁽¹⁾
Operating profit	$	3,290		$	2,410		$	2,330
Add: Depreciation and amortization expense		1,926			2,275			2,061

Operating profit before depreciation and amortization	$	5,216		$	4,685		$	4,391

Operating profit before depreciation and amortization margin		25.7	%		25.1	%		25.4	%
Cash flow information
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	3,905		$	3,691		$	3,277
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,555	)		(1,496	)		(1,857	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(3,379	)		(1,628	)		(1,073	)
Free cash flow⁽²⁾
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	3,905		$	3,691		$	3,277
Less: Cash paid for property and equipment		(477	)		(443	)		(501	)
Less: Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions		(651	)		(564	)		(599	)
Less: Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention		(316	)		(419	)		(537	)
Less: Cash paid for satellites		(113	)		(59	)		(128	)

Free cash flow	$	2,348		$	2,206		$	1,512

⁽¹⁾

Operating profit before depreciation and amortization, which is a financial measure that is not determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, can be calculated by adding amounts under the caption "Depreciation and amortization expense" to "Operating profit." This measure should be used in conjunction with GAAP financial measures and is not presented as an alternative measure of operating results, as determined in accordance with GAAP. Our management and DIRECTV use operating profit before depreciation and amortization to evaluate the operating performance of our company and our business segments and to allocate resources and capital to business segments. This metric is also used as a measure of performance for incentive compensation purposes and to measure income generated from operations that could be used to fund capital expenditures, service debt or pay taxes. Depreciation and amortization expense primarily represents an allocation to current expense of the cost of historical capital expenditures and for acquired intangible assets resulting from prior business acquisitions. To compensate for the exclusion of depreciation and amortization expense from operating profit, our management and DIRECTV separately measure and budget for capital expenditures and business acquisitions.

We believe this measure is useful to investors, along with GAAP measures (such as revenues, operating profit and net income), to compare our operating performance to other communications, entertainment and media service providers. We believe that investors use current and projected operating profit before depreciation and amortization and similar measures to estimate our current or prospective enterprise value and make investment decisions. This metric provides investors with a means to compare operating results exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense. Our management believes this is useful given the significant variation in depreciation and amortization expense that can result from the timing of capital expenditures, the capitalization of intangible assets, potential variations in expected useful lives when compared to other companies and periodic changes to estimated useful lives.

Operating profit before depreciation and amortization margin is calculated by dividing operating profit before depreciation and amortization by Revenues.

⁽²⁾

Free cash flow, which is a financial measure that is not determined in accordance with GAAP, can be calculated by deducting amounts under the captions "Cash paid for property and equipment," "Cash paid for

subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions," "Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention" and "Cash paid for satellites" from "Net cash provided by operating activities" from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. This financial measure should be used in conjunction with other GAAP financial measures and is not presented as an alternative measure of cash flows from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP. Our management and DIRECTV use free cash flow to evaluate the cash generated by our current subscriber base, net of capital expenditures, for the purpose of allocating resources to activities such as adding new subscribers, retaining and upgrading existing subscribers, for additional capital expenditures and other capital investments or transactions and as a measure of performance for incentive compensation purposes. We believe this measure is useful to investors, along with other GAAP measures (such as cash flows from operating and investing activities), to compare our operating performance to other communications, entertainment and media companies. We believe that investors also use current and projected free cash flow to determine the ability of revenues from our current and projected subscriber base to fund required and discretionary spending and to help determine our financial value.

SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS AFFECTING THE COMPARABILITY OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

180 Connect. In July 2008, we acquired 100% of 180 Connect's outstanding common stock and exchangeable shares. Simultaneously, in a separate transaction, UniTek USA, LLC acquired 100% of 180 Connect's cable service operating unit and operations in certain of our installation services markets in exchange for satellite installation operations in certain markets and $7 million in cash. These transactions provide us with ownership and control over a significant portion of our home service provider network. We paid $91 million in cash, net of the $7 million we received from UniTek USA, for the acquisition, including the equity purchase price, repayment of assumed debt and related transaction costs.

In 2010, we issued $6.0 billion of senior notes resulting in $5,978 million of proceeds, net of discount, and repaid the $2,205 million of remaining principal on the Term Loans of its senior secured credit facility. The repayment of the Term Loans resulted in a 2010 pre-tax charge recorded in "Other, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations of $16 million, $10 million after tax resulting from the write-off of deferred debt issuance and other transaction costs.

In 2009, we issued $2.0 billion of senior notes resulting in $1,990 million of proceeds, net of discount. Also in 2009, we purchased and redeemed its then outstanding $910 million 8.375% senior notes, resulting in a 2009 pre-tax charge of $34 million, $21 million after tax, of which $29 million resulted from a premium paid for the redemption and $5 million resulted from the write-off of deferred debt issuance costs and other transaction costs. The charge was recorded in "Other, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In 2008, we issued $1.5 billion in senior notes, and borrowed $1 billion under a new Term Loan of our senior secured credit facility, resulting in proceeds, net of discount, of $2,490 million.

Revenues. We earn revenues mostly from monthly fees we charge subscribers for subscriptions to basic and premium channel programming, HD programming and access fees, pay-per-view programming, and seasonal and live sporting events. We also earn revenues from monthly fees that we charge subscribers with multiple non-leased set-top receivers (which we refer to as mirroring fees), monthly fees we charge subscribers for leased set-top receivers, monthly fees we charge subscribers for

digital video recorder, or DVR, service, hardware revenues from subscribers who lease or purchase set-top receivers from us, our published programming guide, warranty service fees and advertising services. Revenues are reported net of customer credits and discounted promotions.

Broadcast programming and other These costs primarily include license fees for subscription service programming, pay-per-view programming, live sports and other events. Other costs include expenses associated with the publication and distribution of our programming guide, continuing service fees paid to third parties for active subscribers, warranty service costs and production costs for on-air advertisements we sell to third parties.

Subscriber service expenses. Subscriber service expenses include the costs of customer call centers, billing, remittance processing and certain home services expenses, such as in-home repair costs.

Broadcast operations expenses. These expenses include broadcast center operating costs, signal transmission expenses (including costs of collecting signals for our local channel offerings), and costs of monitoring, maintaining and insuring our satellites. Also included are engineering expenses associated with deterring theft of our signal.

Subscriber acquisition costs. These costs include the cost of set-top receivers and other equipment, commissions we pay to national retailers, independent satellite television retailers, dealers and telcos, and the cost of installation, advertising, marketing and customer call center expenses associated with the acquisition of new subscribers. Set-top receivers leased to new subscribers are capitalized in "Property and equipment, net" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and depreciated over their useful lives. The amount of set-top receivers capitalized each period for subscriber acquisitions is included in "Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions" in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Upgrade and retention costs. Upgrade and retention costs are associated with upgrade efforts for existing subscribers that we believe will result in higher average monthly revenue per subscriber, or ARPU, and lower churn. Our upgrade efforts include subscriber equipment upgrade programs for DVR, HD and HD DVR receivers and local channels, our multiple set-top receiver offer and similar initiatives. Retention costs also include the costs of installing and providing hardware under our movers program for subscribers relocating to a new residence. Set-top receivers leased to existing subscribers under upgrade and retention programs are capitalized in "Property and equipment, net" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and depreciated over their useful lives. The amount of set-top receivers capitalized each period for upgrade and retention programs is included in "Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention" in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses include departmental costs for legal, administrative services, finance, marketing and information technology. These costs also include expenses for bad debt and other operating expenses, such as legal settlements, and gains or losses from the sale or disposal of fixed assets.

Average monthly revenue per subscriber. We calculate ARPU by dividing average monthly revenues for the period (total revenues during the period divided by the number of months in the period) by average subscribers for the period. We calculate average subscribers for the period by adding the number of subscribers as of the beginning of the period and for each quarter end in the current year or period and dividing by the sum of the number of quarters in the period plus one.

Average monthly subscriber churn. Average monthly subscriber churn represents the number of subscribers whose service is disconnected, expressed as a percentage of the average total number of subscribers. We calculate average monthly subscriber churn by dividing the average monthly number of

disconnected subscribers for the period (total subscribers disconnected, net of reconnects, during the period divided by the number of months in the period) by average subscribers for the period.

Subscriber Count. The total number of subscribers represents the total number of subscribers actively subscribing to our service, including seasonal subscribers, subscribers who are in the process of relocating and commercial equivalent viewing units. In March 2008, we implemented a change in our commercial pricing and packaging to increase our competitiveness. As a result, during the first quarter of 2008, we made a one-time downward adjustment to the subscriber count of approximately 71,000 subscribers related to commercial equivalent viewing units.

SAC. We calculate SAC, which represents total subscriber acquisition costs stated on a per subscriber basis, by dividing total subscriber acquisition costs for the period by the number of gross new subscribers acquired during the period. We calculate total subscriber acquisition costs for the period by adding together "Subscriber acquisition costs" expensed during the period and the amount of cash paid for equipment leased to new subscribers during the period.

The United States is continuing to undergo a period of economic uncertainty. As discussed in "Competition" in Item 1, in addition to cable and satellite system operators, we are experiencing increasing competition from telcos and other emerging digital media distribution providers. Please refer to "Risk Factors" in Item 1A for a further discussion of risks which may affect forecasted results or our business generally.

Our revenue growth is generated by both increases in the average monthly rates we earn from subscribers, or ARPU, and increases in the total number of subscribers. In 2011, we expect revenue growth in the mid to high single digit percentage range.

In 2011, we expect that the anticipated growth in revenues will be partially offset by higher programming costs, including the costs associated with our contract with the NFL, resulting in operating profit before depreciation and amortization growth in the low to mid single digit percentage range.

The following table provides operating results and a summary of key subscriber data:

										Change

				2010			2009			$			%
				(Dollars in Millions, Except Per Subscriber Amounts)
Revenues				$	20,268		$	18,671		$	1,597			8.6	%
Operating costs and expenses
	Costs of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Broadcast programming and other			8,699			8,027			672			8.4	%
		Subscriber service expenses			1,340			1,268			72			5.7	%
		Broadcast operations expenses			273			274			(1	)		(0.4	)%
	Selling, general and administrative expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Subscriber acquisition costs			2,631			2,478			153			6.2	%
		Upgrade and retention costs			1,106			1,045			61			5.8	%
		General and administrative expenses			1,003			894			109			12.2	%
	Depreciation and amortization expense				1,926			2,275			(349	)		(15.3	)%

			Total operating costs and expenses		16,978			16,261			717			4.4	%

Operating profit				$	3,290		$	2,410		$	880			36.5	%

Other data:
Operating profit before depreciation and amortization				$	5,216		$	4,685		$	531			11.3	%
Total number of subscribers (000's)					19,223			18,560			663			3.6	%
ARPU				$	89.71		$	85.48		$	4.23			4.9	%
Average monthly subscriber churn %					1.53	%		1.53	%		—			0.0	%
Gross subscriber additions (000's)					4,124			4,273			(149	)		(3.5	)%
Subscriber disconnections (000's)					3,461			3,334			127			3.8	%
Net subscriber additions (000's)					663			939			(276	)		(29.4	)%
Average subscriber acquisition costs—per subscriber (SAC)				$	796		$	712		$	84			11.8	%

Subscribers. In 2010, gross subscriber additions decreased primarily due to the impact of the transition to digital broadcast in 2009 and lower additions from our regional telco partners as a result of a more challenging competitive environment. Net subscriber additions decreased from 2009 due to the decrease in gross additions and higher subscriber disconnections associated with the larger subscriber base. Average monthly subscriber churn remained unchanged from 1.53% in 2009.

Revenues. Our revenues increased as a result of higher ARPU and the larger subscriber base. The increase in ARPU resulted primarily from price increases on programming packages, higher HD and DVR service fees.

Operating profit before depreciation and amortization. The improvement of operating profit before depreciation and amortization was primarily due to the gross profit generated from the higher revenues, partially offset by higher subscriber acquisition and upgrade and retention costs and higher general and administrative expenses.

Broadcast programming and other costs increased due to the larger number of subscribers in 2010 and annual program supplier rate increases. Subscriber service expenses increased primarily due to a larger subscriber base in 2010 and costs associated with service quality improvement initiatives.

Subscriber acquisition costs increased from 2009 primarily due to higher subscriber demand for advanced products as well as increased dealer commissions. SAC per subscriber, which includes the cost of capitalized set-top receivers, increased primarily due to higher subscriber demand for advanced products and increased dealer commissions compared to 2009. Under our lease program, we capitalized $651 million of set-top receivers in 2010 and $564 million in 2009 for new subscriber acquisitions.

Upgrade and retention costs increased in 2010 due to increased marketing costs and costs related to advanced product upgrades. Under our lease program we capitalized $316 million of set-top receivers in 2010 and $419 million in 2009 for subscriber upgrades. The decrease in the capitalized amount of set-top receivers is due to a decrease in the cost of advanced products.

General and administrative expenses increased in 2010 primarily due to increased labor and benefit costs related to higher incentive compensation and increased headcount as well as higher bad debt expense associated with higher revenue.

Operating profit. The increase in operating profit was primarily due to higher operating profit before depreciation and amortization and lower depreciation and amortization expense in 2010 as a result of decreased subscriber equipment capitalization and completion of the amortization of subscriber related and orbital slot intangible assets.

Interest expense. The increase in interest expense was from an increase in the average debt balance compared to 2009, partially offset by a decrease in weighted average interest rates.

Income Tax Expense. The increase in income tax expense was primarily due to the higher income before income taxes.

The following table provides operating results and a summary of key subscriber data:

										Change

				2009			2008			$			%
				(Dollars in Millions, Except Per Subscriber Amounts)
Revenues				$	18,671		$	17,310		$	1,361			7.9	%
Operating costs and expenses
	Costs of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Broadcast programming and other			8,027			7,424			603			8.1	%
		Subscriber service expenses			1,268			1,139			129			11.3	%
		Broadcast operations expenses			274			265			9			3.4	%
	Selling, general and administrative expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Subscriber acquisition costs			2,478			2,191			287			13.1	%
		Upgrade and retention costs			1,045			1,027			18			1.8	%
		General and administrative expenses			894			873			21			2.4	%
	Depreciation and amortization expense				2,275			2,061			214			10.4	%

			Total operating costs and expenses		16,261			14,980			1,281			8.6	%

Operating profit				$	2,410		$	2,330		$	80			3.4	%

Other data:
Operating profit before depreciation and amortization				$	4,685		$	4,391		$	294			6.7	%
Total number of subscribers (000's)⁽¹⁾					18,560			17,621			939			5.3	%
ARPU				$	85.48		$	83.90		$	1.58			1.9	%
Average monthly subscriber churn %					1.53	%		1.47	%		—			4.1	%
Gross subscriber additions (000's)					4,273			3,904			369			9.5	%
Subscriber disconnections (000's)					3,334			3,043			291			9.6	%
Net subscriber additions (000's)					939			861			78			9.1	%
Average subscriber acquisition costs—per subscriber (SAC)				$	712		$	715		$	(3	)		(0.4	)%

Subscribers. In 2009, gross subscriber additions increased primarily due to more aggressive promotions, marketing of the AT&T/DIRECTV bundle which began in February 2009, higher demand for advanced services and the impact of the transition to digital programming by broadcasters in the first half of 2009. Net subscriber additions increased from 2008 primarily due to the increase in gross additions, partially offset by higher subscriber disconnections due to a higher average monthly churn rate on a larger subscriber base. Average monthly subscriber churn increased primarily due to stricter upgrade and retention policies for existing customers as well as more aggressive competitor promotions combined with a weaker economy.

Revenues. Our revenues increased as a result of the larger subscriber base and higher ARPU. The increase in ARPU resulted primarily from price increases on programming packages, higher HD and

DVR product penetration, partially offset by more competitive customer promotions, the elimination of satellite lease revenue and lower premium movie package buy rates.

Operating profit before depreciation and amortization. The improvement of operating profit before depreciation and amortization was primarily due to the gross profit generated from the higher revenues, partially offset by higher subscriber acquisition costs principally related to the increase in gross subscriber additions.

Broadcast programming and other costs increased due to the larger number of subscribers in 2009 and annual program supplier rate increases. Subscriber service expenses increased primarily due to a larger subscriber base in 2009 and costs associated with service quality improvement initiatives.

Subscriber acquisition costs increased primarily due to an increase in gross subscriber additions compared to 2008 and increased marketing and advertising costs. SAC per subscriber, which includes the cost of capitalized set-top receivers, decreased primarily due to lower set-top receiver costs and greater savings related to the increased usage of refurbished set-top receivers through our lease program.

Upgrade and retention costs increased in 2009 primarily due to the larger subscriber base, partially offset by decreased installation costs and decreased spending on other programs due to stricter spending policies.

General and administrative expenses increased in 2009 primarily due to increased labor and benefit expense from the increase in headcount within our owned and operated home service provider installation business, partially offset by a $14 million charge in 2008 for the write-off of accounts receivable for equipment and other costs incurred to effect the orderly transition of services from one of our home service providers that ceased operations.

Operating profit. The increase in operating profit was primarily due to higher operating profit before depreciation and amortization, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense in 2009 resulting from the capitalization of set-top receivers under the lease program.

Interest income and expense. The decrease in interest income to $4 million in 2009 from $37 million in 2008 was due to lower interest rates, partially offset by a higher average cash balance. The increase in interest expense to $348 million in 2009 from $315 million in 2008 was due to an increase in the average debt balance compared to 2008, partially offset by decreased interest rates.

Income Tax Expense. We recognized income tax expense of $794 million in 2009 compared to $807 million in 2008. The lower income tax expense in 2009 is primarily attributable to the lower income before income taxes.

Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents and the cash flow that we generate from our operations. Additionally, from 2008 to 2010 we completed multiple financing transactions that have resulted in approximately $10.5 billion of net cash proceeds. We have also experienced significant growth in net cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow. We expect that net cash provided by operating activities to continue to grow and believe that our existing cash balances and cash provided by operations will be sufficient to fund our existing business plan. Additionally, in February 2011, we entered into a new $2 billion revolving credit facility, which is available until 2016. We may borrow under this facility to fund share repurchases or to fund strategic investment opportunities should they arise.

At December 31, 2010, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $687 million compared with $1,716 million at December 31, 2009.

We have received capital contributions and have borrowed amounts from our Parent in the past to fund certain transactions. We may also provide dividends to our Parent or fund other cash requirements, including additional share repurchase programs or other distributions to its stockholders, or to fund strategic investment opportunities should they arise. We may use available cash and cash equivalents, cash from operations, or incur additional borrowings, which may include borrowings under our $2 billion revolving credit facility, to fund such dividends or strategic investment opportunities.

As a measure of liquidity, the current ratio (ratio of current assets to current liabilities) was 0.85 at December 31, 2010 and 1.05 at December 31, 2009. Working capital decreased $691 million to a $519 million deficit at December 31, 2010 from a deficit of $172 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease during the period was mostly due to the increase in our cash used in financing activities resulting from the changes discussed below.

	Years Ended December 31,

	2010			2009			2008
	(Dollars in Millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	3,905		$	3,691		$	3,277
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,555	)		(1,496	)		(1,857	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(3,379	)		(1,628	)		(1,073	)
Free cash flow:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	3,905		$	3,691		$	3,277
Less: Cash paid for property and equipment		(477	)		(443	)		(501	)
Less: Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions		(651	)		(564	)		(599	)
Less: Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention		(316	)		(419	)		(537	)
Less: Cash paid for satellites		(113	)		(59	)		(128	)

Free cash flow	$	2,348		$	2,206		$	1,512

The increases in net cash provided by operating activities in 2010 and 2009 were primarily due to our higher operating profit before depreciation and amortization, which resulted from the higher gross profit generated from an increase in revenues. Cash paid for income taxes was $775 million in 2010, $529 million in 2009 and $753 million in 2008. The increase in cash paid for income taxes in 2010 resulted mainly from increased income from continuing operations and prior year tax credits taken in 2009.

During 2008 and 2009, we experienced a reduction in set-top receiver costs and benefited from the use of refurbished set-top receivers from our lease program, which resulted in a reduction in capital expenditures for property and equipment in 2008 and 2009. From 2009 to 2010, capital expenditures for set-top receivers remained relatively consistent.

During 2008, 2009 and 2010, we were in the process of constructing three satellites. Two of those satellites have been completed and placed into service. We expect to place the third satellite in service in the second half of 2013.

During 2010, we had $5,978 million of net cash proceeds from the issuance of senior notes. We also repaid $2,323 million of our long-term debt. Additionally, we paid cash dividends to our Parent in the amounts of $6,900 million in 2010, $2,500 million in 2009 and $3,400 million in 2008. We have provided $500 million in additional dividends to our Parent in 2011 and will likely continue to provide additional dividends to our Parent to fund its cash requirements, including the $6.0 billion share repurchase program announced February 2011 or other distributions to shareholders, or to fund strategic investment opportunities should they arise. We may use available cash and cash equivalents, cash from operations, or incur additional borrowings, which may include borrowings under our $2 billion revolving credit facility, to fund such dividends.

We anticipate additional borrowings in the future in order to achieve our target of outstanding long-term debt of 2.5 times our operating profit before depreciation and amortization.

Free cash flow increased in 2010 as compared to 2009 due to an increase in net cash provided by operating activities.

At December 31, 2010, we had $10,472 million in total outstanding borrowings, bearing a weighted average interest rate of 5.4%. Our outstanding borrowings consist of notes payable as more fully described in Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, Part II of this Annual Report, which we incorporate herein by reference.

Our notes payable mature as follows: $1,000 million in 2014, $2,200 million in 2015 and $7,300 million thereafter.

In February 2011, our senior secured credit facility was terminated and replaced by a new five year, $2.0 billion revolving credit facility. We pay a commitment fee of .30% per year for the unused commitment under the revolving credit facility, and borrowings will bear interest at an annual rate of (i) the London interbank offer rate (LIBOR) (or for Euro advances the EURIBOR rate) plus 1.50% or at our option (ii) the higher of the prime rate plus 0.50% or the Fed Funds Rate plus 1.00%. The commitment fee and the annual interest rate may be increased or decreased under certain conditions, which include changes in our long-term, unsecured debt ratings. The revolving credit facility is unsecured and has been fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by substantially all of our current and certain of our future domestic subsidiaries on a senior unsecured basis.

Covenants and Restrictions. The revolving credit facility requires us to maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter a specified ratio of indebtedness to adjusted net income. The revolving credit facility also includes covenants that restrict our ability to, among other things, (i) incur additional subsidiary indebtedness, (ii) incur liens, (iii) enter into certain transactions with affiliates, (iv) merge or consolidate with another entity, (v) sell, assign, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets, and (vi) change its lines of business. Additionally, the senior notes contain restrictive covenants that are similar. Should we fail to comply with these covenants, all or a portion of our borrowings under the senior notes could become immediately payable and its revolving credit facility could be terminated. As of February 7, 2011, the closing date of the revolving credit facility, we were in

compliance with all such covenants. The senior notes and revolving credit facility also provide that the borrowings may be required to be prepaid if certain change-in-control events occur.

National Football League Strike or Lockout. We have a contract with the National Football League for the exclusive rights to distribute the NFL Sunday Ticket Package to our subscribers. The NFL's collective bargaining agreement with its players expires before the beginning of the 2011-2012 NFL season. If there is a players' strike or an owners' lockout and no games are played or a reduced schedule is played, we would still be obligated to make certain contractual payments to the NFL for such season. Our subscriber revenues would decrease if NFL games are not played or a full season is lost and cash flows from operating activities would decrease from lower revenues because we would still be obligated to make certain contractual payments to the NFL. We will be able to partially offset these payments through provisions such as credits in the following year, reimbursements for games not played and its rights to an extra season if the entire season is cancelled, but in the near term a strike or lockout could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows from operating activities primarily due to payments we may have to make to the NFL, including minimum contractual obligations, an optional advance payment that may be requested by the NFL and the loss of subscriber revenue, as well as possibly resulting in reduced subscriber additions and higher churn.

Other. Several factors may affect our ability to fund our operations and commitments that we discuss in "Contractual Obligations", "Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements" and "Contingencies" below. In addition, our future cash flows may be reduced if we experience, among other things, significantly higher subscriber additions than planned, increased subscriber churn or upgrade and retention costs, higher than planned capital expenditures for satellites and broadcast equipment, or satellite anomalies or signal theft. Additionally, our ability to borrow under its revolving credit facility is contingent upon our meeting a financial and other covenants associated with its facility as more fully described above.

The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010, including the future periods in which payments are expected. Additional details regarding these obligations are provided in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 referenced in the table.

	Payments due by period

Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
	(Dollars in Millions)
Long-term debt obligations (Note 7)^(a)	$	16,750	$	575	$	1,154	$	2,053	$	12,968
Purchase obligations (Note 13)^(b)		7,214		1,870		3,461		1,843		40
Operating lease obligations (Note 13)^(c)		281		56		80		36		109
Other long-term liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under GAAP (Notes 13)^(d),^(e)		130		69		34		17		10

Total	$	24,375	$	2,570	$	4,729	$	3,949	$	13,127

commitments include guaranteed minimum contractual commitments that are typically based on a flat fee or a minimum number of required subscribers subscribing to the related programming. Actual payments may exceed the minimum payment requirements if the actual number of subscribers subscribing to the related programming exceeds the minimum amounts. Service contract commitments include minimum commitments for the purchase of services that have been outsourced to third parties, such as billing services, telemetry, tracking and control services and broadcast center services. In most cases, actual payments, which are typically based on volume, usually exceed these minimum amounts.

^(c): Certain of our operating leases contain escalation clauses and renewal or purchase options, which we do not consider in the amounts disclosed.
^(d): Other long-term liabilities consist of the amounts we owe to National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative, or NRTC, for the purchase of distribution rights and to the NRTC members that elected the long-term payment option resulting from the NRTC acquisition transactions in 2004, capital lease obligations, including interest, and satellite contracts.
^(e): Payments due by period for other long-term liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet under GAAP do not include payments that could be made related to our net unrecognized tax benefits liability, which amounted to $65 million as of December 31, 2010. The timing and amount of any future payments is not reasonably estimable, as such payments are dependent on the completion and resolution of examinations with tax authorities. We do not expect a significant payment related to these obligations within the next twelve months.

As of December 31, 2010, we were contingently liable under standby letters of credit and bonds in the aggregate amount of $1 million for insurance deductibles.

For a discussion of "Contingencies", see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report, which we incorporate herein by reference.

For a discussion of "Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions," see Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report, which we incorporate herein by reference.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect amounts reported. Management bases its estimates, judgments and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported for future periods may be affected by changes in those estimates. The following represents what we believe are the critical accounting policies that may involve a higher degree of estimation, judgment and complexity. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, including those discussed below, see Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

Income Taxes. We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining provisions for income taxes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits, tax benefits and

deductions, and in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.

We assess the recoverability of deferred tax assets at each reporting date and where applicable, record a valuation allowance to reduce the total deferred tax asset to an amount that will, more-likely-than-not, be realized in the future. Our assessment includes an analysis of whether deferred tax assets will be realized in the ordinary course of operations based on the available positive and negative evidence, including the scheduling of deferred tax liabilities and forecasted income from operating activities. The underlying assumptions we use in forecasting future taxable income require significant judgment. In the event that actual income from operating activities differs from forecasted amounts, or if we change our estimates of forecasted income from operating activities, we could record additional charges or reduce allowances in order to adjust the carrying value of deferred tax assets to their realizable amount. Such adjustments could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

In addition, the recognition of a tax benefit for tax positions involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. We provide for taxes for uncertain tax positions where assessments have not been received. We believe such tax reserves are adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments. Once established, we adjust these amounts only when more information is available or when an event occurs necessitating a change to the reserves. Future events such as changes in the facts or law, judicial decisions regarding the application of existing law or a favorable audit outcome will result in changes to the amounts provided.

Contingent Matters. Determining when, or if, an accrual should be recorded for a contingent matter, including but not limited to legal and tax issues, and the amount of such accrual, if any, requires a significant amount of management judgment and estimation. We develop our judgments and estimates in consultation with outside counsel based on an analysis of potential outcomes. Due to the uncertainty of determining the likelihood of a future event occurring and the potential financial statement impact of such an event, it is possible that upon further development or resolution of a contingent matter, we could record a charge in a future period that would be material to our consolidated financial statements.

Depreciable Lives of Leased Set-Top Receivers. We currently lease most set-top receivers provided to new and existing subscribers and therefore capitalize the cost of those set-top receivers. We depreciate capitalized set-top receivers over a three year estimated useful life, which is based on, among other things, management's judgment of the risk of technological obsolescence. Changes in the estimated useful lives of set-top receivers capitalized could result in significant changes to the amounts recorded as depreciation expense. We regularly evaluate the estimated useful life of our set-top receivers and it is possible that we may change the useful life of set-top receivers in the near term. If we had changed the depreciable life of our set-top receivers as of January 1, 2010 to four years, annual depreciation for 2010 would have decreased by over $300 million.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets. We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used, other than goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, when events and circumstances warrant such a review. We consider the carrying value of a long-lived asset impaired when the anticipated undiscounted future cash flow from such asset is separately identifiable and is less than its carrying value. In that event, we recognize a loss based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. We determine fair value primarily using the estimated future cash flows associated with the asset under review, discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved, and other valuation techniques. We determine losses on long-lived assets to be disposed

of in a similar manner, except that we reduce the fair value for the cost of disposal. Changes in estimates of future cash flows could result in a write-down of the asset in a future period.

Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently when events and circumstances change that would more likely than not result in an impairment loss. We completed our annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2010, and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives. As of December 31, 2010, the fair value of the Company and our intangible assets with indefinite lives significantly exceed their carrying values. See Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report, which we incorporate herein by reference.

The goodwill evaluation requires the estimation of our business as a whole. We determine fair values primarily using estimated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved, when appropriate. Estimation of future cash flows requires significant judgment about future operating results, and can vary significantly from one evaluation to the next. Risk adjusted discount rates are not fixed and are subject to change over time. As a result, changes in estimated future cash flows and/or changes in discount rates could result in a write-down of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives in a future period, which could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements see Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report, which we incorporate herein by reference.

The following discussion and the estimated amounts generated from the sensitivity analyses referred to below include forward-looking statements of market risk which assume for analytical purposes that certain adverse market conditions may occur. Actual future market conditions may differ materially from such assumptions and the amounts noted below are the result of analyses used for the purpose of assessing possible risks and the mitigation thereof. Accordingly, you should not consider the forward-looking statements as our projections of future events or losses.

From time to time, we may be subject to fluctuating interest rates for variable rate borrowings, which may adversely impact our consolidated results of operations and cash flows. We had outstanding debt of $10,472 million at December 31, 2010, which consisted entirely, of our fixed rate borrowings.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Company") as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in owner's equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of DIRECTV Holdings LLC at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

			Years Ended December 31,

			2010			2009			2008
			(Dollars in Millions)
Revenues			$	20,268		$	18,671		$	17,310
Operating costs and expenses
	Costs of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Broadcast programming and other		8,699			8,027			7,424
		Subscriber service expenses		1,340			1,268			1,139
		Broadcast operations expenses		273			274			265
	Selling, general and administrative expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Subscriber acquisition costs		2,631			2,478			2,191
		Upgrade and retention costs		1,106			1,045			1,027
		General and administrative expenses		1,003			894			873
	Depreciation and amortization expense			1,926			2,275			2,061

		Total operating costs and expenses		16,978			16,261			14,980

Operating profit				3,290			2,410			2,330
Interest income				5			4			37
Interest expense				(488	)		(348	)		(315	)
Other, net				(5	)		(17	)		5

Income before income taxes				2,802			2,049			2,057
Income tax expense				(1,051	)		(794	)		(807	)

Net income			$	1,751		$	1,255		$	1,250

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

			December 31,

			2010			2009
			(Dollars in Millions)
ASSETS
Current assets
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	687		$	1,716
	Accounts receivable, net			1,735			1,421
	Inventories			227			200
	Deferred income taxes			—			60
	Prepaid expenses and other			187			163

		Total current assets		2,836			3,560
Satellites, net				1,794			1,870
Property and equipment, net				2,832			2,998
Goodwill				3,176			3,167
Intangible assets, net				495			582
Other assets				267			231

		Total assets	$	11,400		$	12,408

LIABILITIES AND OWNER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities
	Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$	2,977		$	2,727
	Unearned subscriber revenues and deferred credits			378			353
	Current portion of long-term debt			—			308

		Total current liabilities		3,355			3,388
Long-term debt				10,472			6,500
Deferred income taxes				906			559
Other liabilities and deferred credits				288			510
Commitments and contingencies
Owner's equity (deficit)
	Capital stock and additional paid-in capital			7			1,076
	Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)			(3,628	)		375

		Total owner's equity (deficit)		(3,621	)		1,451

		Total liabilities and owner's equity (deficit)	$	11,400		$	12,408

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN OWNER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)

	Capital stock and additional paid-in capital			Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)			Total owner's equity (deficit)

	(Dollars in Millions)
Balance at January 1, 2008	$	2,782		$	1,958		$	4,740
Net income					1,250			1,250
Dividend to Parent		(436	)		(2,964	)		(3,400	)
Capital contribution from Parent		43						43
Other		14						14

Balance at December 31, 2009		2,403			244			2,647
Net income					1,255			1,255
Dividend to Parent		(1,376	)		(1,124	)		(2,500	)
Capital contribution from Parent		44						44
Other		5						5

Balance at December 31, 2009		1,076			375			1,451
Net income					1,751			1,751
Dividend to Parent		(1,146	)		(5,754	)		(6,900	)
Capital contribution from Parent		67						67
Other		10						10

Balance at December 31, 2010	$	7		$	(3,628	)	$	(3,621	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

				Years Ended December 31,

				2010			2009			2008
				(Dollars in Millions)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income				$	1,751		$	1,255		$	1,250
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
	Depreciation and amortization				1,926			2,275			2,061
	Amortization of deferred revenues and deferred credits				(36	)		(48	)		(104	)
	Share-based compensation expense				67			44			43
	Deferred income taxes				278			229			52
	Other				20			20			11
	Change in other operating assets and liabilities
		Accounts receivable, net			(329	)		(121	)		93
		Inventories			(27	)		(10	)		22
		Prepaid expenses and other			(26	)		98			(109	)
		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			245			(76	)		(47	)
		Unearned subscriber revenues and deferred credits			25			33			(4	)
		Other, net			11			(8	)		9

			Net cash provided by operating activities		3,905			3,691			3,277

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
	Cash paid for property and equipment				(477	)		(443	)		(501	)
	Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions				(651	)		(564	)		(599	)
	Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention				(316	)		(419	)		(537	)
	Cash paid for satellites				(113	)		(59	)		(128	)
	Investment in companies, net of cash acquired				(1	)		(11	)		(97	)
	Other				3			—			5

			Net cash used in investing activities		(1,555	)		(1,496	)		(1,857	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
	Cash proceeds from debt issuance				5,978			1,990			2,490
	Debt issuance costs				(44	)		(14	)		(19	)
	Repayment of long-term debt				(2,323	)		(1,018	)		(53	)
	Repayment of other long-term obligations				(99	)		(90	)		(98	)
	Cash dividends to Parent				(6,900	)		(2,500	)		(3,400	)
	Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation				9			4			7

			Net cash used in financing activities		(3,379	)		(1,628	)		(1,073	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents					(1,029	)		567			347
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year					1,716			1,149			802

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year				$	687		$	1,716		$	1,149

Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest				$	392		$	341		$	289
Cash paid for income taxes					775			529			753

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

DIRECTV Holdings LLC is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of DIRECTV and consists of DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. We sometimes refer to DIRECTV Holdings LLC as DIRECTV Holdings, DIRECTV U.S., we or us and sometimes refer to DIRECTV as our Parent. We are the largest provider of direct-to-home, or DTH, digital television services and the second largest provider in the multi-channel video programming distribution, or MVPD, industry in the United States.

On November 19, 2009, The DIRECTV Group, Inc., or DIRECTV Group, and Liberty Media Corporation, which we refer to as Liberty or Liberty Media, obtained shareholder approval of and closed a series of related transactions which we refer to collectively as the Liberty Transaction. The Liberty Transaction included the split-off of certain of the assets of the Liberty Entertainment group into Liberty Entertainment, Inc., or LEI, which was then split-off from Liberty. Following the split-off, DIRECTV Group and LEI merged with subsidiaries of DIRECTV. As a result of the Liberty Transaction, DIRECTV Group, which is comprised of the DIRECTV U.S. and DIRECTV Latin America businesses, and LEI, which held Liberty's 57% interest in DIRECTV Group, a 100% interest in three regional sports networks, a 65% interest in GSN, approximately $120 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $2.1 billion of indebtedness and a related series of equity collars became wholly-owned subsidiaries of DIRECTV. DIRECTV Holdings remained a direct subsidiary of DIRECTV Group and became an indirect subsidiary of DIRECTV.

Note 2: Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

We include the accounts of DIRECTV Holdings and our majority owned subsidiaries, after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions, in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, our actual results reported in future periods may be affected by changes in those estimates.

We recognize subscription and pay-per-view revenues when programming is broadcast to subscribers. We recognize subscriber fees for multiple set-top receivers, our published programming guide, warranty services and equipment rental as revenue, as earned. We recognize advertising revenues when the related services are performed. We defer programming payments received from subscribers in advance of the broadcast as "Unearned subscriber revenues and deferred credits" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets until earned. We recognize revenues to be received under contractual commitments on a straight line basis over the minimum contractual period. We report revenues net of customer credits and discounted promotions.

We recognize the costs of television programming distribution rights when we distribute the related programming. We recognize the costs of television programming rights to distribute live sporting events for a season or tournament to expense using the straight-line method over the course of the season or tournament. However, we charge the cost of multi-year programming contracts for live sporting events with minimum guarantee payments, such as our agreement with the NFL, based on the contractual rates in the contract per season, unless the contractual rates are inconsistent with the relative value of the programming from season to season, in which case we record the expense based on the ratio of each period's sports programming package revenues to the estimated total package revenues to be earned over the contract period. We evaluate estimated total contract revenues at least annually.

We defer advance payments in the form of cash and equity instruments from programming content providers for carriage of their signal and recognize them as a reduction of "Broadcast programming and other" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over the related contract term. We record equity instruments at fair value based on quoted market prices or values determined by management.

Subscriber acquisition costs consist of costs we incur to acquire new subscribers. We include the cost of set-top receivers and other equipment, commissions we pay to national retailers, independent satellite television retailers, dealers, telephone communication companies and the cost of installation, advertising, marketing and customer call center expenses associated with the acquisition of new subscribers in subscriber acquisition costs. We expense these costs as incurred, or when subscribers activate the DIRECTV® service, as appropriate, except for the cost of set-top receivers leased to new subscribers which we capitalize in "Property and equipment, net" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Although paid in advance, the retailer or dealer earns substantially all commissions paid for customer acquisitions over 12 months from the date of subscriber activation. Should the subscriber cancel our service during the 12 month service period, we are reimbursed for the unearned portion of the commission by the retailer or dealer and record a decrease to subscriber acquisition costs. We include the amount of our set-top receivers capitalized each period for subscriber acquisition activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows under the caption "Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions." See Note 4 below for additional information.

Upgrade and retention costs consist primarily of costs we incur for loyalty programs offered to existing subscribers. The costs for loyalty programs include the costs of installing or providing hardware under our movers program (for subscribers relocating to a new residence), multiple set-top receiver offers, digital video recorder, or DVR, high-definition, or HD, local channel upgrade programs and other similar initiatives, and third party commissions we incur for the sale of additional set-top receivers to existing subscribers. We expense these costs as incurred, except for the cost of set-top receivers leased to existing subscribers which we capitalize in "Property and equipment, net" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We include the amount of our set-top receivers capitalized each period for upgrade and retention activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows under the caption "Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention." See Note 4 below for additional information.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit and highly liquid investments we purchase with original maturities of three months or less.

We state inventories at the lower of average cost or market. Inventories consist of finished goods for DIRECTV System equipment and DIRECTV System access cards.

We carry property and equipment, and satellites at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. The amounts we capitalize for satellites currently being constructed and those that have been successfully launched include the costs of construction, launch, launch insurance, incentive obligations and capitalized interest. We generally compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We amortize leasehold improvements over the lesser of the life of the asset or term of the lease.

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are carried at historical cost and are subject to write-down, as needed, based upon an impairment analysis that we must perform at least annually, or sooner if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not result in an impairment loss. We perform our annual impairment analysis in the fourth quarter of each year. If an impairment loss results from the annual impairment test, we would record the loss as a pre-tax charge to operating income.

We amortize other intangible assets using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from 5 to 15 years.

We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used, other than goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, when events and circumstances warrant such a review. We consider the carrying value of a long-lived asset impaired when the anticipated undiscounted future cash flow from such asset is separately identifiable and is less than its carrying value. In that event, we would recognize a loss based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. We determine fair value primarily using estimated future cash flows associated with the asset under review, discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved, or other valuation techniques. We determine losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of in a similar manner, except that we reduce the fair value for the cost of disposal.

We account for investments in which we own at least 20% of the voting securities or have significant influence under the equity method of accounting. We record equity method investments at cost and adjust for the appropriate share of the net earnings or losses of the investee. We record investee losses up to the amount of the investment plus advances and loans made to the investee, and financial guarantees made on behalf of the investee.

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, investments and other assets, accounts payable, and amounts included in accrued liabilities and other meeting the definition of a financial instrument approximated their fair values at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

We defer costs we incur to issue debt and amortize these costs to interest expense using the straight-line method over the term of the respective obligation.

DIRECTV grants restricted stock units and common stock options to certain employees.

We record compensation expense equal to the fair value of stock-based awards at the date approved on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of up to three years, reduced for estimated forfeitures and adjusted for anticipated payout percentages related to the achievement of performance targets.

We join in the filing of DIRECTV's consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. We determine our income taxes based upon our tax sharing agreement with our Parent, which generally provides that the current income tax liability or receivable be computed as if we were a separate taxpayer.

We determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences to reverse. We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax provisions, assessing the likelihood of recovering our deferred tax assets, and evaluating tax positions.

We recognize a benefit in "Income tax expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for uncertain tax positions that are more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination, measured at the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits represent tax benefits taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns, for which the benefit has not yet been recognized in "Income tax expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations due to the uncertainty of whether such benefits will be ultimately realized. We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in "Income tax expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in "Income tax expense" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations at such time that the benefit is effectively settled.

We expense advertising costs primarily in "Subscriber acquisition costs" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as incurred. Advertising expenses, net of payments received from programming content providers for marketing support, were $229 million in 2010, $222 million in 2009 and $211 million in 2008.

We sell programming services and extend credit, in amounts generally not exceeding $200 each, to a large number of individual residential subscribers throughout the United States. As applicable, we maintain allowances for anticipated losses.

We determine the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities based on the three level valuation hierarchy established for classification of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and may be observable or unobservable. The three level hierarchy of inputs is as follows:

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. On January 1, 2010, we adopted the revisions issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, to consolidation accounting standards for variable interest entities, or VIEs. The new standard replaces the quantitative- based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. Instead, the new approach is qualitative and focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity's performance and (1) the obligation to absorb the losses of an entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. As a result of the changed requirements, it is possible that an entity's previous assessment of a VIE will change, and the standard now requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The adoption of these changes on January 1, 2010 did not have an effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position

Noncontrolling interests. On January 1, 2009 we adopted new accounting standards for the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries, also known as minority interests, in consolidated financial statements. The new standards also provide guidance on accounting for changes in the parent's ownership interest in a subsidiary and establishes standards of accounting for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary due to the loss of control. Reporting entities must now present certain noncontrolling interests as a component of equity and present net income and consolidated comprehensive income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest separately in the consolidated financial statements. These new standards are required to be applied prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which must be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Our adoption of these changes did not have any effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations. On January 1, 2009 we adopted a new business combination accounting standard that requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to record 100% of all assets and

liabilities acquired, including goodwill and any non-controlling interest, generally at their fair values for all business combinations, whether partial, full or step acquisitions. Under the new standard, certain contingent assets and liabilities, as well as contingent consideration, are also required to be recognized at fair value on the date of acquisition and acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs will be expensed. Additionally, disclosures are required describing the nature and financial effect of the business combination and the standard also changes the accounting for certain income tax assets recorded in purchase accounting. The adoption of the new accounting requirements as required, on January 1, 2009, changed the way we account for adjustments to deferred tax asset valuation allowances recorded in purchase accounting for prior business combinations so that adjustments to these deferred tax asset valuation allowances will no longer be recorded to goodwill but rather adjustments will be recorded in "Income tax expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, the adoption of the new accounting guidance changed the accounting for all business combinations we consummate after January 1, 2009.

Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements. In September 2009, the FASB approved a revised standard for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Under the revised standard, the criteria for determining whether a deliverable should be considered a separate unit of accounting has changed to remove a limitation for separation to only items with objective and reliable evidence of fair value. Instead, the revised standard allows entities to use the "best estimate of selling price" in addition to third-party evidence or actual selling prices for determining the fair value of a deliverable. The standard also includes additional disclosure requirements for revenue arrangements for multiple deliverables. We do not expect the adoption of the revised standard to have an effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position, when adopted, as required, on January 1, 2011.

The following table sets forth the amounts recorded for "Accounts receivable, net" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31:

The following table sets forth the amounts recorded for "Satellites, net" and "Property and equipment, net" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31:

			2010			2009

			(Dollars in Millions)
Satellites		10-15	$	2,739		$	2,355
Satellites under construction				70			354

Total				2,809			2,709
Less: Accumulated depreciation				(1,015	)		(839	)

	Satellites, net		$	1,794		$	1,870

Land and improvements		—	$	33		$	26
Buildings and leasehold improvements		6-30		299			301
Machinery and equipment		2-23		1,541			1,449
Capitalized software		3		1,889			1,566
Subscriber leased set-top receivers		3		4,631			3,995
Construction in progress		—		263			330

Total				8,656			7,667
Less: Accumulated depreciation				(5,824	)		(4,669	)

	Property and equipment, net		$	2,832		$	2,998

We capitalized interest costs of $6 million in 2010, $18 million in 2009 and $18 million in 2008, as part of the cost of our property and satellites under construction. Depreciation expense was $1,834 million in 2010, $1,984 million in 2009 and $1,707 million in 2008.

The following table sets forth the amount of set-top receivers we capitalized, and depreciation expense we recorded under the lease program for each of the periods presented:

We depreciate capitalized set-top receivers over a three year estimated useful life, which is based on, among other things, management's judgment of the risk of technological obsolescence. Changes in the estimated useful lives of set-top receivers capitalized could result in significant changes to the amounts recorded as depreciation expense. We regularly evaluate the estimated useful life of our set-top receivers and it is possible that we may change the useful life of set-top receivers in the near term. If we had changed the depreciable life of our set-top receivers as of January 1, 2010 to four years, annual depreciation for 2010 would have decreased by over $300 million.

The following table sets forth the changes in the carrying amounts of "Goodwill" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

The following table sets forth the components for "Intangible assets, net" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at:

				December 31, 2010						December 31, 2009

		Estimated Useful Lives (years)		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
				(Dollars in Millions)
Orbital slots			Indefinite	$	432			$	432	$	432			$	432
72.5° WL orbital license			5		—	$	—		—		219	$	219		—
Subscriber related			5-10		13		5		8		1,348		1,309		39
Dealer network			15		130		99		31		130		90		40
Distribution rights			7		334		310		24		334		263		71

	Total intangible assets			$	909	$	414	$	495	$	2,463	$	1,881	$	582

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $92 million in 2010, $289 million in 2009 and $352 million in 2008.

Estimated amortization expense for intangible assets in each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows: $35 million in 2011, $11 million in 2012, $11 million in 2013, $5 million in 2014 and $1 million in 2015.

We performed our annual impairment tests for goodwill and orbital slots in the fourth quarters of 2010, 2009 and 2008. The estimated fair values for each reporting unit and the orbital slots exceeded our carrying values, and accordingly, no impairment losses were recorded during 2010, 2009 or 2008. Additionally, there are no accumulated impairment losses as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Note 6: Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities; Other Liabilities and Deferred Credits

The following represent significant components of "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31:

The following represent significant components of "Other liabilities and deferred credits" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows as of December 31:

As of December 31, 2010, there were $17 million of amounts payable for satellites in "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets which is considered a non-cash investing activity for purposes of the consolidated statements of Cash Flow for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The senior secured credit facility was secured by substantially all of our assets. As discussed below, in financing transactions in March and August 2010, we repaid the remaining balance of the Term Loans under our senior secured credit facility, which was terminated in February 2011. As of

February 7, 2011, we had the ability to borrow up to $2 billion under a new revolving credit facility discussed below.

On August 17, 2010, pursuant to a registration statement, we issued the following senior notes:

We incurred $19 million of debt issuance costs in connection with these transactions.

On August 20, 2010, we repaid the $1,220 million of remaining principal on Term Loans A and B of our senior secured credit facility. The repayment of Term Loans A and B resulted in a third quarter 2010 pre-tax charge of $7 million, $4 million after tax, resulting from the write-off of deferred debt issuance and other transaction costs. The charge was recorded in "Other, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We incurred $17 million of debt issuance costs in connection with these transactions.

On March 16, 2010, we repaid the $985 million of remaining principal on Term Loan C of our senior secured credit facility. The repayment of Term Loan C resulted in a first quarter 2010 pre-tax charge of $9 million, $6 million after tax, of which $6 million resulted from the write-off of unamortized discount and $3 million resulted from the write-off of deferred debt issuance and other transaction costs. The charge was recorded in "Other, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We incurred $14 million of debt issuance costs in connection with these transactions.

On September 22, 2009, we purchased, pursuant to a tender offer, $583 million of our then outstanding $910 million 8.375% senior notes at a price of 103.125% plus accrued and unpaid interest, for a total of $603 million. On September 23, 2009, we exercised our right to redeem the remaining $327 million of the 8.375% senior notes at a price of 102.792% plus accrued and unpaid interest. On October 23, 2009, we redeemed the remaining $327 million of our 8.375% senior notes at a price of 102.792% plus accrued and unpaid interest for a total of $339 million.

The redemption of our 8.375% senior notes resulted in a 2009 pre-tax charge of $34 million, $21 million after tax, of which $27 million resulted from the premium paid for redemption of our 8.375% senior notes and $7 million resulted from the write-off of deferred debt issuance and other transaction costs. The charge was recorded in "Other, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In May 2008, we completed financing transactions that included the issuance of senior notes and an amendment to our existing senior secured credit facility, resulting in the following new borrowings:

We incurred $19 million of debt issuance costs in connection with these transactions.

Senior Notes. The following table sets forth our outstanding senior notes balance as of December 31:

		Outstanding Balance

		2010		2009
		(Dollars in millions)
4.750% senior notes due in 2014, net of unamortized discount of $2 million as of December 31, 2010 and $3 million as of December 31, 2009		$	998	$	997
6.375% senior notes due in 2015, includes unamortized bond premium of $2 million as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009			1,002		1,002
3.550% senior notes due in 2015, net of unamortized discount of $1 million as of December 31, 2010			1,199		—
3.125% senior notes due in 2016			750		—
7.625% senior notes due in 2016			1,500		1,500
5.875% senior notes due in 2019, net of unamortized discount of $6 million as of December 31, 2010 and $7 million as of December 31, 2009			994		993
5.200% senior notes due in 2020, net of unamortized discount of $2 million as of December 31, 2010			1,298		—
4.600% senior notes due in 2021, net of unamortized discount of $1 million as of December 31, 2010			999		—
6.350% senior notes due in 2040, net of unamortized discount of $1 million as of December 31, 2010			499		—
6.000% senior notes due in 2040, net of unamortized discount of $17 million as of December 31, 2010			1,233		—

	Total senior notes	$	10,472	$	4,492

The fair value of our senior notes was approximately $10,881 million at December 31, 2010 and $4,713 million at December 31, 2009. We calculated the fair values based on quoted market prices of our senior notes, which is a Level 1 input under the accounting guidance.

All of our senior notes were issued by us and have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. All of our senior notes are unsecured and have been fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by substantially all of our current and certain of our future domestic subsidiaries on a senior unsecured basis. Principal on the senior notes is payable upon maturity, while interest is payable semi-annually.

Senior Secured Credit Facility. At December 31, 2010, our senior secured credit facility consisted of a $500 million undrawn six-year revolving credit facility. We paid a commitment fee of 0.175% per year for the unused commitment under the revolving credit facility. The senior secured credit facility was secured by substantially all of our assets and was fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally by substantially all of our material domestic subsidiaries.

Revolving Credit Facility. In February 2011, our senior secured credit facility was terminated and replaced by a new five year, $2.0 billion revolving credit facility. We pay a commitment fee of .30% per year for the unused commitment under the revolving credit facility, and borrowings will bear interest at an annual rate of (i) the London interbank offer rate (LIBOR) (or for Euro advances the EURIBOR rate) plus 1.50% or at our option (ii) the higher of the prime rate plus 0.50% or the Fed Funds Rate plus 1.00%. The commitment fee and the annual interest rate may be increased or decreased under certain conditions, which include changes in our long-term, unsecured debt ratings. The revolving credit

facility is unsecured and has been fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by substantially all of our current and certain of our future domestic subsidiaries on a senior unsecured basis.

Our notes payable mature as follows: $1,000 million in 2014, $2,200 million in 2015 and $7,300 million thereafter. The amount of interest accrued related to our outstanding debt was $138 million at December 31, 2010 and $47 million at December 31, 2009.

Covenants and Restrictions. The revolving credit facility requires us to maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter a specified ratio of indebtedness to adjusted net income. The revolving credit facility also includes covenants that restrict our ability to, among other things, (i) incur additional subsidiary indebtedness, (ii) incur liens, (iii) enter into certain transactions with affiliates, (iv) merge or consolidate with another entity, (v) sell, assign, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets, and (vi) change our lines of business. Additionally, the senior notes contain restrictive covenants that are similar. Should we fail to comply with these covenants, all or a portion of our borrowings under the senior notes could become immediately payable and our revolving credit facility could be terminated. As of February 7, 2011, the closing date for the revolving credit facility, we were in compliance with all such covenants. The senior notes and revolving credit facility also provide that the borrowings may be required to be prepaid if certain change-in-control events occur.

We base our income tax expense or benefit on reported "Income before income taxes." Deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes, which are available to us pursuant to our tax sharing agreement with our Parent and as measured by applying currently enacted tax laws.

Our income tax expense consisted of the following for the years ended December 31:

Our income tax expense was different than the amount computed using the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate for the reasons set forth in the following table for the years ended December 31:

Temporary differences and carryforwards that gave rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 were as follows:

		2010					2009

		Deferred Tax Assets			Deferred Tax Liabilities		Deferred Tax Assets			Deferred Tax Liabilities
		(Dollars in Millions)
Depreciation and amortization		$	—		$	957	$	—		$	637
Accruals and advances			172			151		120			85
Programming contract liabilities			40			—		108			—
Prepaid expenses			—			37		—			19
State taxes			—			16		—			12
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards			15			—		29			—
Other temporary differences			4			8		8			9

	Subtotal		231			1,169		265			762
Valuation allowance			(2	)		—		(2	)		—

	Total deferred taxes	$	229		$	1,169	$	263		$	762

Included in "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets is $34 million of current deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2010.

We assessed the deferred tax assets for the respective periods for recoverability and, where applicable, we recorded a valuation allowance to reduce the total deferred tax assets to an amount that will, more likely than not, be realized in the future.

The valuation allowance balances of $2 million at December 31, 2010 and $2 million at December 31, 2009, are attributable to unused capital losses which are available for carry-forward.

As of December 31, 2010, we have $29 million of federal net operating loss carryforward which expire between 2027 and 2028. The utilization of the federal net operating loss carryforward is subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, however we believe that we will have sufficient taxable income during the limitation period to utilize all of the carryforward.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

		Unrecognized tax benefits

		(Dollars in Millions)
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2008		$	88
	Increases in tax positions for prior years		76
	Increases in tax positions for the current year		21
	Settlements with taxing authorities		1

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2008			186
	Increases in tax positions for prior years		22
	Increases in tax positions for the current year		9
	Settlements with taxing authorities		(2	)

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009			215
	Decreases in tax positions for prior years		(185	)
	Increases in tax positions for the current year		35

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2010		$	65

As of December 31, 2010, our unrecognized tax benefits totaled $65 million, including $42 million of tax positions the recognition of which would affect the annual effective income tax rate.

We recorded $3 million of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in "Income tax expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2010, and have accrued $10 million in interest and penalties as part of our liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010.

We file numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in many state jurisdictions. For U.S. federal tax purposes, the tax years 2007 through 2009 remain open to examination. The California tax years 1994 through 2009 remain open to examination and the income tax returns in the other state tax jurisdictions in which we have operations are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return.

We do not anticipate changes to the total unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months which will have a significant effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Most of our employees are eligible to participate in our Parent's funded non-contributory defined benefit pension plan, which provides defined benefits based on either years of service and final average salary, or eligible compensation while employed by us. We have not separately determined the accumulated benefit obligation and net assets available for benefits for our employees and do not include these items in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition to pension benefits, DIRECTV charges us for the cost of certain other post-retirement benefits. The accumulated other post-retirement benefit obligation related to our employees has not been separately determined and is not included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. We also participate in other health and welfare plans of DIRECTV. Our portion of the cost of these benefit plans, allocated from DIRECTV, amounted to $24 million in 2010, $19 million in 2009 and $16 million in 2008.

Under The DIRECTV Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Plan, or the DIRECTV Plan, as approved by our Parent's stockholders on June 5, 2007, shares, rights or options to acquire up to 21 million shares of common stock plus the number of shares that were granted under a former plan but which, after December 22, 2003 are forfeited, expire or are cancelled without the delivery of shares of common stock or otherwise result in the return of such shares to us, were authorized for grant through June 4, 2017, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of our Parent's Board of Directors. Under the DIRECTV Plan, our Parent issues new shares of its Class A common stock when restricted stock units are earned and when stock options are exercised.

Restricted Stock Units. The Compensation Committee of DIRECTV has granted restricted stock units under our Parent's stock plans to certain of our employees and executives. Annual awards are mostly performance-based, vest over three years and provide for final payments in shares of our Parent's Class A common stock. Final payment can be reduced or increased from the target award amounts based on our Parent company's performance over a three-year performance period in comparison with pre-established targets. We determine the fair value of restricted stock units based the closing stock price of our Parent's Class A common shares on the date of grant.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, our employees were granted 2.7 million restricted stock units with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $31.05 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2009, our employees were granted 2.4 million restricted stock units with a weighted average grant-date fair value of approximately $21.26 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2008, our employees were granted 2.3 million restricted stock units with a weighted average grant-date fair value of approximately $23.15 per share.

Stock Options. DIRECTV's Compensation Committee has also granted stock options to acquire our Parent's Class A common stock under our Parent's stock plans to certain of our employees and executives. The exercise price of options granted is equal to at least 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date the options were granted. These nonqualified options generally vest over one to five years, expire ten years from date of grant and are subject to earlier termination under certain conditions. During the year ended December 31, 2010, our employees were granted 1.0 million stock options with a grant-date fair value of approximately $12.36 per share. No stock options were granted to our employees during 2008 and 2009. The grant date fair value of common stock options is determined by our Parent using the Black-Scholes valuation model.

The following table presents amounts recorded related to share-based compensation for the years ended December 31:

As of December 31, 2010, there was $75 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested restricted stock units and stock options, which we expect to recognize as follows: $46 million in 2011 and $29 million in 2012.

As of December 31, 2010, our employees held 1.7 million stock options and 6.8 million restricted stock units.

In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into transactions with related parties as discussed below.

We determine our income taxes based upon our tax sharing agreement with our Parent, which generally provides that the current income tax liability or receivable be computed as if we were a separate taxpayer. Payments made to our Parent under this tax sharing arrangement were $754 million in 2010 and $502 million in 2009. We also receive an allocation of employee benefit expenses from DIRECTV. We believe that our consolidated financial statements reflect our cost of doing business in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 55, "Allocation of Expenses and Related Disclosures in Financial Statements of Subsidiaries, Divisions or Lesser Business Components of Another Entity."

We paid dividends to our Parent in the amounts of $6,900 million in 2010, $2,500 million in 2009 and $3,400 million in 2008 from available cash and cash equivalents. In addition, we paid $500 million in dividends to our Parent during January 2011.

Beginning November 19, 2009, transactions with the regional sports networks which were acquired by DIRECTV on that date are also included as transactions with DIRECTV and affiliates.

On June 16, 2010, our Parent completed a transaction, which we refer to as the Malone transaction, with Dr. John Malone, his wife and certain trusts for the benefit of their children, which we refer to as the Malones', which resulted in the reduction of the Malones voting interest in our Parent from approximately 24.3% to approximately 3% and Dr. Malone's resignation from our Parent's Board of Directors.

Prior to the completion of the Malone Transaction, Dr. Malone was Chairman of the Board of Directors of DIRECTV and of Liberty Media. Dr. Malone also had an approximate 35% voting interest in Liberty Media, an approximate 31% voting interest in Discovery Communications, Inc., or

Discovery Communications, an approximate 40% voting interest in Liberty Global Inc., or Liberty Global, and serves as Chairman of Liberty Global, and certain of Liberty Media's management and directors also serve as directors of Discovery Communications or Liberty Global. As a result of this common ownership and management, transactions with Liberty Media, Discovery Communications and Liberty Global and their subsidiaries or equity method investees were considered to be related party transactions through the completion of the Malone Transaction. Our transactions with Liberty Media, Discovery Communications and Liberty Global consisted primarily of purchases of programming created, owned or distributed by Liberty Media and Discovery Communications and its subsidiaries and investees.

The majority of payments under contractual arrangements with Liberty Media, Discovery Communications, Liberty Global and News Corporation entities relate to multi-year programming contracts. Payments under these contracts are typically subject to annual rate increases and are based on the number of subscribers receiving the related programming.

News Corporation and its affiliates were considered related parties until February 27, 2008, when News Corporation transferred its 41% interest in our Parent's common stock to Liberty Media. Accordingly, the following contractual arrangements with News Corporation and its affiliates are considered related party transactions and reported through February 27, 2008: purchase of programming, products and advertising; license of certain intellectual property, including patents; purchase of system access products, set-top receiver software and support services; sale of advertising space; purchase of employee services; and use of facilities.

Companies in which we hold equity method investments are also considered related parties.

Beginning November 19, 2009, transactions with the Game Show Network, which our Parent holds an equity method investment in, are also included as transactions with Other.

The following table summarizes sales and purchase transactions with related parties:

		2010		2009		2008

		(Dollars in Millions)
Sales:
Liberty Media and affiliates		$	26	$	56	$	36
Discovery Communications, Liberty Global and affiliates			5		11		10
News Corporation and affiliates			—		—		2
DIRECTV and affiliates			7		7		—
Other			5		1		2

	Total	$	43	$	75	$	50

Purchases:
Liberty Media and affiliates		$	143	$	355	$	267
Discovery Communications, Liberty Global and affiliates			111		219		164
News Corporation and affiliates			—		—		157
DIRECTV and affiliates			53		7		—
Other			91		69		35

	Total	$	398	$	650	$	623

The following table sets forth the amount of accounts receivable from and accounts payable to related parties as of December 31:

The accounts receivable and accounts payable balances as of December 31, 2010 are primarily related to intercompany transactions with our Parent and the accounts receivable and accounts payable balances as of December 31, 2009 are primarily related to affiliates of Liberty Media.

180 Connect. In July 2008, we acquired 100% of 180 Connect Inc.'s outstanding common stock and exchangeable shares. Simultaneously, in a separate transaction, UniTek USA, LLC acquired 100% of 180 Connect's cable service operating unit and operations in certain of our installation services markets in exchange for satellite installation operations in certain markets and $7 million in cash. These transactions provide us with control over a significant portion of our home service provider network. We paid $91 million in cash, net of the $7 million we received from UniTek USA, for the acquisition, including the equity purchase price, repayment of assumed debt and related transaction costs.

We accounted for the 180 Connect acquisition using the purchase method of accounting, and began consolidating the results from the date of acquisition. The consolidated financial statements reflect the final allocation of the $91 million net purchase price to assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition using information currently available. The assets acquired included approximately $5 million in cash. The excess of the purchase

price over the estimated fair values of the net assets has been recorded as goodwill, $28 million of which will be deductible for tax purposes.

The following table sets forth the final allocation of the purchase price to the 180 Connect net assets acquired in July 2008 (dollars in millions):

The following selected unaudited pro forma information is being provided to present a summary of the combined results of us and 180 Connect for 2008 as if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the period, giving effect to purchase accounting adjustments. The pro forma data is presented for informational purposes only and may not necessarily reflect the results of our operations had 180 Connect operated as part of us for the period presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of the results of future operations. The pro forma information excludes the effect of non-recurring charges.

At December 31, 2010, minimum future commitments under noncancelable operating leases having lease terms in excess of one year were primarily for satellite transponder leases and real property and aggregated $281 million, payable as follows: $56 million in 2011, $42 million in 2012, $38 million in 2013, $23 million in 2014, $13 million in 2015 and $109 million thereafter. Certain of these leases contain escalation clauses and renewal or purchase options, which we have not considered in the amounts disclosed. Rental expenses under operating leases were $63 million in 2010, $62 million in 2009 and $53 million in 2008.

At December 31, 2010, our minimum payments under agreements to purchase broadcast programming, regional professional team rights and the purchase of services that we have outsourced to third parties, such as billing services, and satellite telemetry, tracking and control, satellite launch contracts and broadcast center services aggregated $7,214 million, payable as follows: $1,870 million in 2011, $1,939 million in 2012, $1,522 million in 2013, $1,202 million in 2014, $641 million in 2015 and $40 million thereafter.

At December 31, 2010, other long-term obligations totaling $119 million are payable approximately as follows: $64 million in 2011, $16 million in 2012, $14 million in 2013, $11 million in 2014, $4 million in 2015 and $10 million thereafter. These amounts are recorded in "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" and "Other liabilities and deferred credits" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Litigation is subject to uncertainties and the outcome of individual litigated matters is not predictable with assurance. Various legal actions, claims and proceedings are pending against us arising in the ordinary course of business. We have established loss provisions for matters in which losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Some of the matters may involve compensatory, punitive, or treble damage claims, or demands that, if granted, could require us to pay damages or make other expenditures in amounts that could not be estimated at December 31, 2010. After discussion with counsel representing us in those actions, it is the opinion of management that such litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

During the year ended December 31, 2010 an arbitration panel determined that, pursuant to a contractual indemnity provision, one of our vendors was required to reimburse us $28 million for legal fees and settlement payments incurred and pay accrued interest to us for patent infringement claims settled by us in previous periods. We received the cash payment during the year ended December 31, 2010 and recorded $25 million as a reduction to "General and administrative expenses" and $3 million as "Interest income" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Finisar Corporation. As previously reported, we were successful in 2008 getting the jury verdict in the Finisar case vacated on appeal. The original verdict found the patent to be valid and willfully infringed, and the jury awarded approximately $79 million in damages. The trial court increased the damages award by $25 million because of the jury finding of willful infringement and awarded pre-judgment interest of $13 million. DIRECTV was also ordered to pay into escrow $1.60 per new set-top receiver manufactured for use with the DIRECTV system beginning June 17, 2006 and continuing until the patent expires in 2012 or was otherwise found to be invalid. On April 18, 2008, the Court of Appeals reversed the verdict of the district court in part, vacated the findings of infringement,

and remanded for further proceedings on the remaining issues finding that the district court had applied erroneous interpretations of certain terms of the claims. On remand, we sought and obtained summary judgment on invalidity of all remaining claims, and the case against DIRECTV was dismissed on May 19, 2009. Finisar filed a Notice of Appeal, and oral argument on the appeal was held on January 6, 2010. On January 8, 2010, the Court of Appeals affirmed per curiam the grant of summary judgment on all claims. This case is now resolved and there will be no further proceedings in this matter.

Intellectual Property Litigation. We are a defendant in several unrelated lawsuits claiming infringement of various patents relating to various aspects of our businesses. In certain of these cases other industry participants are also defendants, and also in certain of these cases we expect that any potential liability would be the responsibility of our equipment vendors pursuant to applicable contractual indemnification provisions. To the extent that the allegations in these lawsuits can be analyzed by us at this stage of their proceedings, we believe the claims are without merit and intend to defend the actions vigorously. The final disposition of these claims is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, but could possibly be material to our consolidated results of operations of any one period. No assurance can be given that any adverse outcome would not be material to our consolidated financial position.

Early Cancellation Fees. In 2008, a number of plaintiffs filed putative class action lawsuits in state and federal courts challenging the early cancellation fees we assess our customers when they do not fulfill their programming commitments. Several of these lawsuits are pending—some in California state court purporting to represent statewide classes, and some in federal courts purporting to represent nationwide classes. The lawsuits seek both monetary and injunctive relief. While the theories of liability vary, the lawsuits generally challenge these fees under state consumer protection laws as both unfair and inadequately disclosed to customers. Each of the lawsuits is at an early stage. Where possible, we are moving to compel these cases to arbitration in accordance with our Customer Agreement, but in states such as California where the enforceability of the arbitration provision is limited, we intend to defend against these allegations in court. We believe that our early cancellation fees are adequately disclosed, and represent reasonable estimates of the costs we incur when customers cancel service before fulfilling their programming commitments.

From time to time, we receive investigative inquiries or subpoenas from state and federal authorities with respect to alleged violations of state and federal statutes. These inquiries may lead to legal proceedings in some cases. We have received a request for information from the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, on issues similar to those resolved with the multistate group of state attorneys general discussed below. We are cooperating with the FTC by providing information about our sales and marketing practices and customer complaints.

In December 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement with a multistate group of state attorneys general to resolve concerns regarding alleged violations of their respective state consumer protection statutes. The state of Washington, originally a part of the multistate group, filed an action in Washington state court in December 2009, and that litigation was settled on the same substantive terms as reached with the multistate group. We did not admit any wrongdoing in entering into the settlement. We agreed to formalize many business improvements made in the last few years and to further improve other practices. We paid a total of $14.25 million to the 50 states as costs of investigation and attorneys fees, and has agreed to implement a restitution program for consumers who send eligible complaints.

We may purchase in-orbit and launch insurance to mitigate the potential financial impact of satellite launch and in-orbit failures if the premium costs are considered economic relative to the risk of satellite failure. The insurance generally covers the unamortized book value of covered satellites. We do not insure against lost revenues in the event of a total or partial loss of the capacity of a satellite. We generally rely on in-orbit spare satellites and excess transponder capacity at key orbital slots to mitigate the impact a satellite failure could have on our ability to provide service. At December 31, 2010, the net book value of in-orbit satellites was $1,724 million, all of which was uninsured.

We are contingently liable under standby letters of credit and bonds in the aggregate amount of $1 million at December 31, 2010.

The following presents the condensed consolidating statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 of DIRECTV Holdings together with DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc., or the Co-Issuers, and each of DIRECTV Holdings' material subsidiaries (other than DIRECTV Financing), or the Guarantor Subsidiaries, and the eliminations necessary to present DIRECTV Holdings' financial statements on a consolidated basis. These condensed consolidating financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements of DIRECTV Holdings.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010

				Co-Issuers			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			DIRECTV Holdings Consolidated

				(Dollars in Millions)
Revenues				$	463		$	20,268		$	(463	)	$	20,268
Operating costs and expenses
	Costs of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Broadcast programming and other			—			8,699			—			8,699
		Subscriber service expenses			—			1,340			—			1,340
		Broadcast operations expenses			—			273			—			273
	Selling, general and administrative expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Subscriber acquisition costs			—			2,631			—			2,631
		Upgrade and retention costs			—			1,106			—			1,106
		General and administrative expenses			—			1,466			(463	)		1,003
	Depreciation and amortization expense				—			1,926			—			1,926

			Total operating costs and expenses		—			17,441			(463	)		16,978

Operating profit					463			2,827			—			3,290
Equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries					1,776			—			(1,776	)		—
Interest income					1			4			—			5
Interest expense					(480	)		(8	)		—			(488	)
Other, net					(25	)		20			—			(5	)

Income before income taxes					1,735			2,843			(1,776	)		2,802
Income tax benefit (expense)					16			(1,067	)		—			(1,051	)

Net income				$	1,751		$	1,776		$	(1,776	)	$	1,751

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009

				Co-Issuers			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			DIRECTV Holdings Consolidated

				(Dollars in Millions)
Revenues				$	332		$	18,671		$	(332	)	$	18,671
Operating costs and expenses
	Costs of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Broadcast programming and other			—			8,027			—			8,027
		Subscriber service expenses			—			1,268			—			1,268
		Broadcast operations expenses			—			274			—			274
	Selling, general and administrative expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Subscriber acquisition costs			—			2,478			—			2,478
		Upgrade and retention costs			—			1,045			—			1,045
		General and administrative expenses			—			1,226			(332	)		894
	Depreciation and amortization expense				—			2,275			—			2,275

			Total operating costs and expenses		—			16,593			(332	)		16,261

Operating profit					332			2,078			—			2,410
Equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries					1,275			—			(1,275	)		—
Interest income					4			—			—			4
Interest expense					(335	)		(13	)		—			(348	)
Other, net					(34	)		17			—			(17	)

Income before income taxes					1,242			2,082			(1,275	)		2,049
Income tax benefit (expense)					13			(807	)		—			(794	)

Net income				$	1,255		$	1,275		$	(1,275	)	$	1,255

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008

				Co-Issuers			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			DIRECTV Holdings Consolidated

				(Dollars in Millions)
Revenues				$	287		$	17,310		$	(287	)	$	17,310
Operating costs and expenses
	Costs of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Broadcast programming and other			—			7,424			—			7,424
		Subscriber service expenses			—			1,139			—			1,139
		Broadcast operations expenses			—			265			—			265
	Selling, general and administrative expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense
		Subscriber acquisition costs			—			2,191			—			2,191
		Upgrade and retention costs			—			1,027			—			1,027
		General and administrative expenses			—			1,160			(287	)		873
	Depreciation and amortization expense				—			2,061			—			2,061

			Total operating costs and expenses		—			15,267			(287	)		14,980

Operating profit					287			2,043			—			2,330
Equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries					1,235			—			(1,235	)		—
Interest income					36			1			—			37
Interest expense					(298	)		(17	)		—			(315	)
Other, net					—			5			—			5

Income before income taxes					1,260			2,032			(1,235	)		2,057
Income tax expense					(10	)		(797	)		—			(807	)

Net income				$	1,250		$	1,235		$	(1,235	)	$	1,250

			Co-Issuers			Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			DIRECTV Holdings Consolidated

			(Dollars in Millions)
ASSETS
Total current assets			$	743		$	2,147	$	(54	)	$	2,836
Satellites, net				—			1,794		—			1,794
Property and equipment, net				—			2,832		—			2,832
Goodwill				1,828			1,348		—			3,176
Intangible assets, net				—			495		—			495
Other assets				13,032			6,069		(18,834	)		267

Total assets			$	15,603		$	14,685	$	(18,888	)	$	11,400

LIABILITIES AND OWNER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Total current liabilities			$	160		$	3,247	$	(52	)	$	3,355
Long-term debt				10,472			—		—			10,472
Deferred income taxes				—			1,123		(217	)		906
Other liabilities and deferred credits				8,592			289		(8,593	)		288
Owner's equity
	Capital stock and additional paid-in capital			7			4,602		(4,602	)		7
	Retained earnings			(3,628	)		5,424		(5,424	)		(3,628	)

		Total owner's equity (deficit)		(3,621	)		10,026		(10,026	)		(3,621	)

Total liabilities and owner's equity (deficit)			$	15,603		$	14,685	$	(18,888	)	$	11,400

			Co-Issuers		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			DIRECTV Holdings Consolidated

			(Dollars in Millions)
ASSETS
Total current assets			$	1,756	$	1,854	$	(50	)	$	3,560
Satellites, net				—		1,870		—			1,870
Property and equipment, net				—		2,998		—			2,998
Goodwill				1,828		1,339		—			3,167
Intangible assets, net				—		582		—			582
Other assets				10,228		3,873		(13,870	)		231

Total assets			$	13,812	$	12,516	$	(13,920	)	$	12,408

LIABILITIES AND OWNER'S EQUITY
Total current liabilities			$	380	$	3,057	$	(49	)	$	3,388
Long-term debt				6,500		—		—			6,500
Deferred income taxes				—		775		(216	)		559
Other liabilities and deferred credits				5,481		510		(5,481	)		510
Owner's equity
	Capital stock and additional paid-in capital			1,076		4,526		(4,526	)		1,076
	Retained earnings			375		3,648		(3,648	)		375

		Total owner's equity		1,451		8,174		(8,174	)		1,451

Total liabilities and owner's equity			$	13,812	$	12,516	$	(13,920	)	$	12,408

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010

			Co-Issuers			Guarantor Subsidiaries			DIRECTV Holdings Consolidated

			(Dollars in Millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
	Net cash provided by operating activities		$	2,263		$	1,642		$	3,905

Cash flows from investing activities
	Cash paid for property and equipment			—			(477	)		(477	)
	Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions			—			(651	)		(651	)
	Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention			—			(316	)		(316	)
	Cash paid for satellites			—			(113	)		(113	)
	Investment in companies, net of cash acquired			—			(1	)		(1	)
	Other			—			3			3

		Net cash used in investing activities		—			(1,555	)		(1,555	)

Cash flows from financing activities
	Cash proceeds from debt issuance			5,978			—			5,978
	Debt issuance costs			(44	)		—			(44	)
	Repayment of long-term debt			(2,323	)		—			(2,323	)
	Repayment of other long-term obligations			—			(99	)		(99	)
	Cash dividends to Parent			(6,900	)		—			(6,900	)
	Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation			—			9			9

		Net cash used in financing activities		(3,289	)		(90	)		(3,379	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents				(1,026	)		(3	)		(1,029	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period				1,709			7			1,716

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period			$	683		$	4		$	687

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009

			Co-Issuers			Guarantor Subsidiaries			DIRECTV Holdings Consolidated

			(Dollars in Millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
	Net cash provided by operating activities		$	2,108		$	1,583		$	3,691

Cash flows from investing activities
	Cash paid for property and equipment			—			(443	)		(443	)
	Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions			—			(564	)		(564	)
	Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention			—			(419	)		(419	)
	Cash paid for satellites			—			(59	)		(59	)
	Investment in companies, net of cash acquired			—			(11	)		(11	)

		Net cash used in investing activities		—			(1,496	)		(1,496	)

Cash flows from financing activities
	Cash proceeds from debt issuance			1,990			—			1,990
	Debt issuance costs			(14	)		—			(14	)
	Repayment of long-term debt			(1,018	)		—			(1,018	)
	Repayment of other long-term obligations			—			(90	)		(90	)
	Cash dividends to Parent			(2,500	)		—			(2,500	)
	Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation			—			4			4

		Net cash used in financing activities		(1,542	)		(86	)		(1,628	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents				566			1			567
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period				1,143			6			1,149

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period			$	1,709		$	7		$	1,716

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008

			Co-Issuers			Guarantor Subsidiaries			DIRECTV Holdings Consolidated

			(Dollars in Millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
	Net cash provided by operating activities		$	1,335		$	1,942		$	3,277

Cash flows from investing activities
	Cash paid for property and equipment			—			(501	)		(501	)
	Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions			—			(599	)		(599	)
	Cash paid for subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention			—			(537	)		(537	)
	Cash paid for satellites			—			(128	)		(128	)
	Investment in companies, net of cash acquired			—			(97	)		(97	)
	Other			—			5			5

		Net cash used in investing activities		—			(1,857	)		(1,857	)

Cash flows from financing activities
	Cash proceeds from debt issuance			2,490			—			2,490
	Debt issuance costs			(19	)		—			(19	)
	Repayment of long-term debt			(53	)		—			(53	)
	Repayment of other long-term obligations			—			(98	)		(98	)
	Cash dividends to Parent			(3,400	)		—			(3,400	)
	Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation			—			7			7

		Net cash used in financing activities		(982	)		(91	)		(1,073	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents				353			(6	)		347
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period				790			12			802

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period			$	1,143		$	6		$	1,149

The following table presents unaudited selected quarterly data for 2010 and 2009:

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

We carried out an evaluation as of the end of the year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officers and financial officers, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act). Based on the evaluation, our principal executive officers and our financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2010.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Those rules define internal control over financial reporting as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria established in

Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on their assessment and those criteria, management believes that, as of December 31, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on internal control over financial reporting, which appears below.

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of DIRECTV Holdings LLC (the "Company") as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 of the Company and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The aggregate fees Deloitte & Touche LLP billed for professional services in 2010 and 2009 were:

"Audit Fees" are fees Deloitte & Touche LLP bills us for professional services for the audit of our consolidated financial statements included in Form 10-K and review of our consolidated financial statements included in Form 10-Qs. Deloitte & Touche LLP bills us for "Audit-Related Services," which are principally for accounting consultations and assurance and related services associated with our financing transactions. DIRECTV engages our accountant on our behalf to render audit and non-audit services for us.

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Name

*3.1		Certificate of Formation of DIRECTV Holdings LLC dated as of June 11, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form S-4 of DIRECTV Holdings LLC filed June 26, 2003 (SEC File No. 333-106529)).
*3.2		Certificate of Incorporation of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. dated as of February 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form S-4 of DIRECTV Holdings LLC filed June 26, 2003 (SEC File No. 333-106529)).
*3.3		Limited Liability Company Agreement of DIRECTV Holdings LLC dated as of June 11, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the Form S-4 of DIRECTV Holdings LLC filed June 26, 2003 (SEC File No. 333-106529)).
*3.4		Amended and Restated By-laws of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 of the Form S-4 of DIRECTV Holdings, LLC filed on February 5, 2010 (SEC File No. 333-106529)).
*4.1		Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2005, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, DIRECTV Financing Co, Inc., the Guarantors signatory thereto and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co, Inc. filed June 20, 2005 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*4.2		Form of 6³/8% Senior Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co, Inc. filed June 20, 2005 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*4.3		Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 28, 2006 by and among LABC Productions, LLC, DIRECTV Holdings LLC, DIRECTV Financing Co, Inc., the Guarantors signatory thereto and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Form 10-K of The DIRECTV Group, Inc. filed March 1, 2007 (SEC File No. 1-31945))
*4.4		Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2008, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, DIRECTV Financing Co, Inc., the Guarantors signatory thereto and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. filed May 16, 2008 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*4.5		Form of 7⁵/8% Senior Notes due 2016 (included in Exhibit 4.4)

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Name

*4.6		Indenture, dated as of September 22, 2009, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, DIRECTV Financing Co, Inc., the Guarantors signatory thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings, LLC filed on September 25, 2009 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*4.7		Form of 4³/4% Senior Notes due 2014 (included in Exhibit 4.6)
*4.8		Form of 5⁷/8% Senior Notes due 2019 (included in Exhibit 4.6)
*4.9		Indenture, dated as of March 11, 2010, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc., the Guarantors signatory thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC filed on March 15, 2010 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*4.10		Form of 3.550% Senior Notes due 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.9)
*4.11		Form of 5.200% Senior Notes due 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.9)
*4.12		Form of 6.35% Senior Notes due 2040 (included in Exhibit 4.9)
*4.13		Indenture, dated as of August 17, 2010, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc., the Guarantors signatory thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC filed on August 23, 2010 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*4.14		First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 17, 2010, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc., the Guarantors signatory thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC filed on August 23, 2010 (SEC File No. 333-106529)
*4.15		Form of 3.125% Senior Notes due 2016 (included in Exhibit 4.14)
*4.16		Form of 4.600% Senior Notes due 2021 (included in Exhibit 4.14)
*4.17		Form of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2040 (included in Exhibit 4.14)
*10.1		Intellectual Property License Agreement dated as of February 10, 2003, between HEC and DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC, as licensee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Form S-4 of DIRECTV Holdings LLC filed June 26, 2003 (SEC File No. 333-106529)).
*10.2		Credit Agreement dated as of April 13, 2005 by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, the lenders party to the Credit Agreement, certain subsidiaries of the DIRECTV Holdings LLC, as guarantors, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, Credit Suisse First Boston, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. and Citicorp North America, Inc. as Co-Documentation Agents, and Banc of America Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Co-Lead Arrangers and Co-Book Managers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. filed April 13, 2005 (SEC File No. 333-106529))

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Name

*10.3		Security Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2005, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, its subsidiaries named therein as grantors and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. filed April 13, 2005 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*10.4		Pledge Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2005, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, its subsidiaries named therein as pledgors and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. filed April 13, 2005 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*10.5		Amendment No.1, dated as of May 14, 2008, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC, the Guarantors and Lenders signatory thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. filed May 16, 2008 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*10.6		Tranche C Term Loan Joinder Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2008, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Form 8-K of DIRECTV Holdings LLC and DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. filed May 16, 2008 (SEC File No. 333-106529))
*10.7		Credit Agreement dated as of February 7, 2011, by and among DIRECTV Holdings LLC and certain of DIRECTV Holdings LLC's subsidiaries as Guarantors, and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, the lenders party to the Credit Agreement, Barclays Capital, as Syndication Agent, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, The Royal Bank Of Scotland PLC and UBS AG, Stamford Branch as Co-Documentation Agents, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Barclays Capital, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, RBS Securities Inc. and UBS AG, Stamford Branch as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners
**23		Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
***31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV Holdings LLC pursuant to Section 302.
***31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of DIRECTV Holdings LLC pursuant to Section 302.
***31.3		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. pursuant to Section 302.
***31.4		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. pursuant to Section 302.
***32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV Holdings LLC pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906").

A copy of any of the exhibits included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than those as to which confidential treatment has been granted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon payment of a fee to cover the reasonable expenses of furnishing such exhibits, may be obtained by written request to us at the address set forth on the front cover, attention General Counsel.

Description		Balance at Beginning of year			Additions Charged to costs and expenses			Additions Charged to other accounts			Deductions		Balance at end of year

		(Dollars in Millions)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Allowances Deducted from Assets
	Accounts receivable	$	(29	)	$	(244	)	$	(255	)^(a)	$	482^(b)	$	(46	)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Allowances Deducted from Assets
	Accounts receivable	$	(32	)	$	(200	)	$	(238	)^(a)	$	441^(b)	$	(29	)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
Allowances Deducted from Assets
	Accounts receivable	$	(39	)	$	(181	)	$	(192	)^(a)	$	380^(b)	$	(32	)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on this 25^th day of February 2011 by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.


/s/ MICHAEL D. WHITE Michael D. White	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	}Principal Executive Officer
/s/ PATRICK T. DOYLE Patrick T. Doyle	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director	}Principal Financial Officer
/s/ JOHN F. MURPHY John F. Murphy	Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer	}Principal Accounting Officer
/s/ LARRY D. HUNTER Larry D. Hunter	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on this 25^th day of February 2011 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.


/s/ MICHAEL D. WHITE Michael D. White	President and Chief Executive Officer	}Principal Executive Officer
/s/ PATRICK T. DOYLE Patrick T. Doyle	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	}Principal Financial Officer
/s/ JOHN F. MURPHY John F. Murphy	Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer	}Principal Accounting Officer
/s/ LARRY D. HUNTER Larry D. Hunter	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Director

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Name

23		Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV Holdings LLC pursuant to Section 302.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of DIRECTV Holdings LLC pursuant to Section 302.
31.3		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. pursuant to Section 302.
31.4		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. pursuant to Section 302.
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV Holdings LLC pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906").
32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of DIRECTV Holdings LLC pursuant to Section 906.
32.3		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. pursuant to Section 906.
32.4		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. pursuant to Section 906.
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


(Mark One)
ý		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 333-106529


DIRECTV Holdings LLC—Delaware DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc.—Delaware		25-1902628 59-3772785
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2230 East Imperial Highway, El Segundo, California		90245
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer ý (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o



Part I
	Item 1.	Business	1
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	15
	Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	27
	Item 2.	Properties	28
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	28
	Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	29
Part II
	Item 5.	Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	30
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	30
	Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	46
	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	47
		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	47
		Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008	48
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009	49
		Consolidated Statements of Changes in Owner's Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008	50
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008	51
		Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	52
	Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	83
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	83
	Item 9B.	Other Information	86
Part III
	Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	86
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation	86
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	86
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	86
	Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	86
Part IV
	Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	87
Signatures			92



Level 1:		Valuation is based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2:		Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3:		Valuation is based upon other unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

		2010			2009

		(Dollars in Millions)
Subscriber		$	1,085		$	887
Trade and other			696			563

Subtotal			1,781			1,450
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts			(46	)		(29	)

	Accounts receivable, net	$	1,735		$	1,421

	Years ended December 31,

Capitalized subscriber leased equipment:	2010		2009		2008
	(Dollars in Millions)
Subscriber leased equipment—subscriber acquisitions	$	651	$	564	$	599
Subscriber leased equipment—upgrade and retention		316		419		537

Total subscriber leased equipment capitalized	$	967	$	983	$	1,136

Depreciation expense—subscriber leased equipment	$	1,145	$	1,333	$	1,100

		(Dollars in Millions)

Balance as of January 1, 2009		$	3,189
	New acquisitions		24
	Finalization of prior acquisitions		(46	)

Balance as of December 31, 2009		$	3,167
	Acquisition accounting adjustments		9

Balance as of December 31, 2010		$	3,176

		2010		2009

		(Dollars in Millions)
Programming costs		$	1,611	$	1,679
Accounts payable			448		302
Payroll and employee benefits			174		122
Interest payable			138		47
Property and income taxes			36		45
Other			570		532

	Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	2,977	$	2,727

		2010		2009

		(Dollars in Millions)
Other accrued taxes		$	70	$	229
Deferred credits			69		78
Programming costs			43		76
Other			106		127

	Total other liabilities and deferred credits	$	288	$	510

	Principal		Proceeds, net of discount

	(Dollars in millions)
3.125% senior notes due in 2016	$	750	$	750
4.600% senior notes due in 2021		1,000		999
6.000% senior notes due in 2040		1,250		1,233

	$	3,000	$	2,982

	Principal		Proceeds, net of discount

	(Dollars in millions)
3.550% senior notes due in 2015	$	1,200	$	1,199
5.200% senior notes due in 2020		1,300		1,298
6.350% senior notes due in 2040		500		499

	$	3,000	$	2,996

	Principal		Proceeds, net of discount

	(Dollars in millions)
4.750% senior notes due in 2014	$	1,000	$	997
5.875% senior notes due in 2019		1,000		993

	$	2,000	$	1,990

				2010		2009		2008

				(Dollars in Millions)
Current tax expense:
	U.S. federal			$	569	$	532	$	691
	State and local				41		69		64

		Total			610		601		755

Deferred tax expense:
	U.S. federal				372		165		12
	State and local				69		28		40

		Total			441		193		52

			Total income tax expense	$	1,051	$	794	$	807

		2010			2009		2008

		(Dollars in Millions)
Expected expense at U.S. federal statutory income tax rate		$	981		$	717	$	720
U.S. state and local income tax expense, net of federal benefit			96			64		77
Multistate tax planning			(17	)		—		—
Tax credits and other			(9	)		13		10

	Total income tax expense	$	1,051		$	794	$	807


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

	2010		2009		2008

	(Dollars in Millions)
Share-based compensation expense recognized	$	67	$	44	$	43
Tax benefits associated with share-based compensation expense		26		17		16
Actual tax benefits realized for the deduction of share-based compensation expense		37		24		30


Total current assets		$	18
Property and equipment			16
Goodwill			97
Investments and other assets			51

Total assets acquired		$	182

Total current liabilities		$	83
Other liabilities			8

Total liabilities assumed		$	91

	Net assets acquired	$	91

	1st		2nd		3rd		4th

	(Dollars in Millions)
2010 Quarters
Revenues	$	4,772	$	4,934	$	5,031	$	5,531
Operating profit		808		899		720		863
Net income		433		482		352		484
2009 Quarters
Revenues	$	4,303	$	4,539	$	4,703	$	5,126
Operating profit		397		652		611		750
Net income		197		350		311		397

Type of Fees	2010		2009

	(Dollars in Millions)
Audit Fees and Audit-Related Services	$	3	$	3

		Page Number

1.	All Financial Statements	See Part II
2.	Financial Statement Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
3.	Exhibits (Including Those Incorporated By Reference)

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Name

***32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of DIRECTV Holdings LLC pursuant to Section 906.
***32.3		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. pursuant to Section 906.
***32.4		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of DIRECTV Financing Co., Inc. pursuant to Section 906.
****101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
****101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
****101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
****101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
****101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
****101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


	DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC (Registrant)
Date: February 25, 2011	By:	/s/ PATRICK T. DOYLE Patrick T. Doyle Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


	DIRECTV FINANCING CO., INC. (Registrant)
Date: February 25, 2011	By:	/s/ PATRICK T. DOYLE Patrick T. Doyle Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer