Definitive Proxy Statement

You are cordially invited to attend our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Monday, March 21, 2011, at our offices at 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California 94538.

The formal notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Proxy Statement have been made a part of this invitation.

Whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. After reading the Proxy Statement, please promptly vote and submit your proxy by dating, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope. Your shares cannot be voted unless you submit your proxy or attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person.

The Board of Directors and management look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Sincerely,

/s/ Simon Y. Leung

Simon Leung

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary

SYNNEX Corporation will hold its Annual Meeting of Stockholders at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Monday, March 21, 2011, at our offices at 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California 94538.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on February 9, 2011 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at this Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. For ten days prior to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be available at the Corporate Secretary’s office at 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California 94538.

It is important that your shares are represented at this Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we hope that you will promptly vote and submit your proxy by dating, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card. This will not limit your rights to attend or vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

/s/ Simon Y. Leung

Simon Leung

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on March 21, 2011.

Our Proxy Statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, along with the proxy card, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 and Letter to Stockholders, dated February 24, 2011 are available on our website at www.synnex.com.

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of SYNNEX Corporation, a Delaware corporation, of proxies to be used at our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournments or postponements thereof. Our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at our offices at 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Monday, March 21, 2011. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy card are being mailed to stockholders on or about February 24, 2011.

Your Board of Directors asks you to appoint Kevin Murai, Dennis Polk and Simon Leung as your proxy holders to vote your shares at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. You make this appointment by voting the enclosed proxy card using one of the voting methods described below.

If appointed by you, the proxy holders will vote your shares as you direct on the matters described in this Proxy Statement. In the absence of your direction, they will vote your shares as recommended by your Board of Directors.

Unless you otherwise indicate on the proxy card, you also authorize your proxy holders to vote your shares on any matters not known by your Board of Directors at the time this Proxy Statement was printed and which, under our Bylaws, may be properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Only stockholders who owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on February 9, 2011, the record date for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, can vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. As of the close of business on February 9, 2011, we had 36,308,319 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share held as of February 9, 2011. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors.

You may vote your shares at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders either in person or by proxy as described below. Stockholders holding shares through a bank or broker should follow the voting instructions on the form of proxy card received. Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote by proxy, as it is not practical for most stockholders to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Giving a proxy will not affect your right to vote your shares if you attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and want to vote in person.

Voting by Mail. You may vote by proxy by dating, signing and returning your proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid return envelope.

Voting by Telephone and Internet. Depending upon your bank or broker, you may vote by telephone and Internet. Your bank or broker can provide further instructions. Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote by telephone or Internet, as it is not practical for most stockholders to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Giving a proxy will not affect your right to vote your shares if you attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and want to vote in person.

Voting at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If you hold shares through a bank or broker, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the bank or broker to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Voting by mail will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, if you decide to attend in person.

If you submit your proxy, but do not mark your voting preference, the proxy holders will vote your shares FOR the election of the nominees for director, FOR the approval of the amendment to our Executive Profit Sharing Plan for Section 16(b) Officers, FOR the approval of our executive compensation, FOR the approval of a tri-annual advisory vote on our executive compensation and FOR the ratification of the appointment of independent registered public accountants.

Stockholders can revoke their proxies at any time before they are exercised in any of three ways:

Directors are elected by a plurality vote, which means that the eight nominees receiving the most affirmative votes will be elected. However, your Board of Directors has adopted a majority vote standard for director elections. As a result, if a director receives less than a majority of the votes cast for such director, the Board of Directors will evaluate the situation and is authorized to remedy the situation as it deems appropriate, including requesting that the affected director resign from the Board of Directors. All other matters submitted for stockholder approval require the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote.

A quorum, which is a majority of the outstanding shares as of February 9, 2011, must be present to hold the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. A quorum is calculated based on the number of shares represented by the stockholders attending in person and by their proxy holders. If you indicate an abstention as your voting preference, your shares will be counted toward a quorum but they will not be voted on the matter.

Abstentions on any matters are treated as shares present or represented and entitled to vote on that matter and have the same effect as a vote against such matter.

Brokers who hold shares of our common stock for a beneficial owner have the discretion to vote on routine proposals when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. If a broker indicates on the enclosed proxy card or its substitute that such broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter (broker non-votes), those shares will be considered as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be treated as shares entitled to vote on that matter.

We will pay the cost of printing and mailing proxy materials. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, solicitation may be made by our directors, officers and other employees by personal interview, telephone or facsimile. No additional compensation will be paid to these persons for solicitation. We will reimburse brokerage firms and others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners of our common stock.

Please promptly vote and submit your proxy by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-prepaid return envelope so that your shares can be voted. This will not limit your rights to attend or vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Our Bylaws currently provide that the number of directors which shall constitute the whole Board of Directors shall be fixed from time to time by the Board of Directors or stockholders. We currently have authorized eight directors. At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, eight persons will be elected as members of your Board of Directors, each for a one-year term or until their successors are elected and qualified. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors has nominated, and the Board of Directors has designated, the eight persons listed below for election at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards, a majority of the members serving on your Board of Directors must be independent directors. Your Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Breidenbach, Quesnel, Steffensen, Van Horne and Zitzner and Ms. Zulberti have no material relationship with us and that each of these directors is an independent director. With the exception of Ms. Zulberti, who was appointed to the Board of Directors in September 2010, all of the nominees were elected at SYNNEX Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on March 22, 2010. The proxies given to the proxy holders will be voted or not voted as directed and, if no direction is given, will be voted FOR these eight nominees. Your Board of Directors knows of no reason why any of these nominees should be unable or unwilling to serve. However, if for any reason any nominee should be unable or unwilling to serve, the proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by your Board of Directors to fill the vacancy.

Certain information with respect to each nominee appears on the following pages, including age, position (if any) with SYNNEX, business experience during at least the past five years and directorships of other publicly-owned corporations. Ages are as of February 24, 2011.

Dwight Steffensen has served as a member of our Board of Directors since February 2002 and as Chairman of the Board since June 2010. He also served as Lead Director from March 2006 to June 2010. Mr. Steffensen served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Merisel, Inc. from February 1996 until August 2000. Prior to joining Merisel, Mr. Steffensen served as President and Chief Operating Officer at Bergen Brunswig Corporation, a healthcare company. Prior to the merger of Bergen Brunswig Corporation and Synergex Corporation, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Synergex. Mr. Steffensen is a member of the Board of Directors of OmniVision Technologies, Inc. Mr. Steffensen received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Stanford University and is a certified public accountant (inactive). As a former executive officer and member of the Board of Directors of Merisel, Inc., one of our former competitors and an Audit Committee financial expert, we believe that Mr. Steffensen contributes his leadership skills, industry knowledge, finance background, and business experience to our Board of Directors. In addition, we believe that Mr. Steffensen’s membership on our Board of Directors helps to achieve the objective that its membership be composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, skills and other individual qualities that contribute to Board heterogeneity.

Kevin Murai, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director, joined us in March 2008. He served as Co-Chief Executive Officer until Robert Huang’s retirement in December 2008. Prior to SYNNEX, Mr. Murai was employed for 19 years at Ingram Micro Inc., most recently as President, Chief Operating Officer and a member of the Board of Directors. During his nineteen-year tenure at Ingram Micro, Mr. Murai served in several executive management positions. Currently, he serves on the Board of Directors for the Global Technology Distribution Council, and also serves on the Dean’s Advisory Council of the University of Waterloo. He holds a Bachelor of Applied Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada. As a former executive officer and member of the Board of Directors of Ingram Micro, one of our competitors, we believe that Mr. Murai contributes his leadership skills, industry knowledge, technology background, and business experience to our Board of Directors. It is also important that the Chief Executive Officer serve on the Board of Directors. In addition, we believe that Mr. Murai’s membership on our Board of Directors helps to achieve the objective that its membership be composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, skills and other individual qualities that contribute to Board heterogeneity.

Fred Breidenbach has served as a member of our Board of Directors since February 2003. Mr. Breidenbach has had his own consulting firm of FA Breidenbach & Associates, LLC since November 1997. Prior to that, he served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, an aviation company, from 1993 to 1997. Prior to joining Gulfstream, Mr. Breidenbach spent 25 years in various positions at General Electric Company, including five years as an officer of the General Electric Company and two years as President, GE Aerospace Asia Pacific, responsible for business development and Asian operations. Mr. Breidenbach received a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Engineering from Pennsylvania State University and a Master of Business Administration from Xavier University. As a former executive officer of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation and General Electric Company, we believe that Mr. Breidenbach contributes his leadership skills, GE related corporate discipline, Asia Pacific knowledge, technology background, and business experience to our Board of Directors. In addition, we believe that Mr. Breidenbach’s membership on our Board of Directors helps to achieve the objective that its membership be composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, skills and other individual qualities that contribute to Board heterogeneity.

Matthew Miau has served as a member of our Board of Directors since 1992 and as a non-executive employee since 2001. In connection with Mr. Huang’s retirement and election as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Miau assumed the position of Chairman Emeritus of the Board in December 2008. Mr. Miau is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of MiTAC International Corporation, Synnex Technology International Corp., UPC Technology Corp. and Lien Hwa Industrial Corp. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of MiTAC Incorporated, Getac Technology Corp., the Institute for Information Industry in Taiwan and the Supervisory Board of Linde AG in Germany. Mr. Miau received a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering/Computer Science from the University of California, Berkeley and a Master of Business Administration degree from Santa Clara University. As the Chairman of the Board of MiTAC International Corporation, we believe that Mr. Miau contributes his leadership skills, distribution, contract manufacturing and Asia Pacific knowledge, finance and technology background, and business experience to our Board of Directors. In addition, we believe that Mr. Miau’s membership on our Board of Directors helps to achieve the objective that its membership be composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, skills and other individual qualities that contribute to Board heterogeneity.

Gregory Quesnel has served as a member of our Board of Directors since September 2005. Mr. Quesnel served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of CNF Inc. from 1998 until his retirement in July 2004. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNF Inc. He joined CNF Inc. in 1975 following several years of professional experience with major corporations in the petroleum and wood products industries. Mr. Quesnel serves on the Boards of Directors of Potlatch Corporation and Ross Stores, Inc. At Potlatch Mr. Quesnel serves on the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee and the Nominating Committee. Mr. Quesnel is a member of the Audit Committee for Ross Stores. Mr. Quesnel received a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from the University of Oregon and holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Portland. As a former executive officer and member of the Board of Directors of CNF Inc. and an Audit Committee financial expert, we believe that Mr. Quesnel contributes his leadership skills, transportation and logistics knowledge, finance background, and business experience to our Board of Directors. In addition, we believe that Mr. Quesnel’s membership on our Board of Directors helps to achieve the objective that its membership be composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, skills and other individual qualities that contribute to Board heterogeneity.

James Van Horne has served as a member of our Board of Directors since September 2005. Mr. Van Horne joined the Stanford University Graduate School of Business faculty in 1965 after earning a doctorate degree from Northwestern University. He presently is the A.P. Giannini Professor of Finance Emeritus Stanford. He served as the Director of the MBA Program at Stanford University from 1970 to 1973 and then served as Associate Dean for Academic Affairs from 1973 to 1975 and 1976 to 1980. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Montgomery Street Income Securities, Inc. As the A.P. Giannini Professor of Finance Emeritus Stanford and an Audit Committee financial expert, we believe that Mr. Van Horne contributes his leadership skills, finance background, and business experience to our Board of Directors. In addition, we believe that Mr. Van Horne’s membership on our Board of Directors helps to achieve the objective that its membership be composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, skills and other individual qualities that contribute to Board heterogeneity.

Duane Zitzner has served as a member of our Board of Directors since May 2007. Mr. Zitzner has had his own consulting firm since January 2005. Prior to that, he served as the Executive Vice President of the Personal Systems Group at Hewlett-Packard Company from 2002 until his retirement in December 2004. Prior to his appointment as Executive Vice President at Hewlett-Packard Company, Mr. Zitzner spent several years in various executive positions at Hewlett-Packard Company, including three years as President of Computing Systems and three years as Vice President and General Manager of the Personal Systems Group. Mr. Zitzner received a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics from the University of Wisconsin – Madison and did advanced studies in Computer Science at the University of Minnesota – Twin Cities. As a former executive officer of Hewlett-Packard Company, we believe that Mr. Zitzner contributes his leadership skills, industry knowledge, technology background, and business experience to our Board of Directors. In addition, we believe that Mr. Zitzner’s membership on our Board of Directors helps to achieve the objective that its membership be composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, skills and other individual qualities that contribute to Board heterogeneity.

Andrea Zulberti has served as a member of our Board of Directors since September 2010. Ms. Zulberti is retired from Barclays Global Investors (now Blackrock, Inc.), one of the world's largest investment management and advisory companies, after a 14-year career in various executive positions, including Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer, Head of Global Risk Management and Head of Global Operations. Ms. Zulberti currently serves on the Board of Trustees of ProLogis, a NYSE-traded REIT that provides distribution facilities globally. She is a member of ProLogis' Audit Committee and Investment and Finance Committee and chairs its Management Development and Compensation Committee. Prior to Barclays Global Investors, Ms. Zulberti’s earlier business roles included co-founding a real estate syndication firm and financial management experience in various industries. Ms. Zulberti graduated with honors with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from California State University at Hayward (now California State University East Bay). Ms. Zulberti is a certified public accountant (inactive) and a member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. As a former executive officer of Barclays Global Investors and current member of the Board of Trustees, Audit Committee and Investment and Finance Committee of ProLogis, we believe that Ms. Zulberti contributes her leadership skills, finance background, and business experience to our Board of Directors. In addition, we believe that Ms. Zulberti’s membership on our Board of Directors helps to achieve the objective that its membership be composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, skills and other individual qualities that contribute to Board heterogeneity.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

The eight nominees for director receiving the highest number of affirmative votes will be elected as directors. However, your Board of Directors has adopted a majority vote standard for director elections. As a result, if a director receives less than a majority of the votes cast for such director, the Board of Directors will evaluate the situation and is authorized to remedy the situation as it deems appropriate, including requesting that the affected director resign from the Board of Directors. Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted “FOR” the nominees.

Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the nominees set forth above as directors of SYNNEX.

The Board of Directors held 10 meetings during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. Except for Ms. Zulberti, who joined the Board of Directors in September 2010, each director attended at least 75% of the total regularly scheduled and special meetings held by the Board of Directors and each director attended 100% of the total regularly scheduled and special meetings held by the committees on which such director served during his tenure in the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. Our non-management directors of the Board of Directors meet in regularly scheduled sessions without the presence of management in Executive Sessions. The Chairman of the Board or the Lead Director, as applicable, presides over each such Executive Session. On June 21, 2010, Mr. Huang retired as Chairman of the Board of Directors and as a member of the Board of Directors and the Board unanimously named Mr. Steffensen, our Lead Director, to be our non-executive Chairman of the Board. As non-executive Chairman and an independent director, Mr. Steffensen relinquished his Lead Director position and such position was not subsequently filled. Historically, our Chief Executive Officer has not served as our Chairman of the Board and we continue to separate the two positions. Separating the two positions ensures that our Chief Executive Officer is accountable for managing our company in close alignment with the interests of stockholders, eliminates the inherent conflict of interest that arises when the roles are combined, promotes oversight of risk and can serve as a conduit for regular communication with stockholders. We do not have a policy regarding directors’ attendance at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, all directors attended the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Board of Directors has established four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Executive Committee. The Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees meet the independence standards of the NYSE and rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). With respect to the Executive Committee, at least one half of the members of the Executive Committee must meet the independence standards of the NYSE and rules and regulations of the SEC. In addition, each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate as defined by your Board of Directors, the independence standards of the NYSE, and rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has approved a charter for each of these committees, which can be found on our website at www.synnex.com. Our corporate governance guidelines and code of ethics, which are applicable to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers, directors and employees, are also available, on or through, our website at www.synnex.com and are available in print to any stockholder upon request. We intend to post any amendments to the corporate governance guidelines or code of ethics on our website.

Our Board of Directors recognizes the importance of effective risk oversight in running a successful business and in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities to SYNNEX and our stockholders. While the Chief Executive Officer and other members of our senior management team are responsible for the day-to-day management of risk, our Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that an appropriate culture of risk management exists within our company and for setting the right “tone at the top,” overseeing our aggregate risk profile, and assisting management in addressing specific risks, such as strategic and competitive risks, financial risks, brand and reputation risks, legal risks, regulatory risks, and operational risks.

Our Board of Directors believes that the current leadership structure best facilitates this oversight of risk by combining independent leadership, through an independent Chairman of the Board, independent board committees, and majority independent board composition, with an experienced Chief Executive Officer who has intimate knowledge of our business, history, and the complex challenges that arise. The Chief Executive Officer’s in-depth understanding of these matters and involvement in the day-to-day management of our company uniquely positions him to promptly identify and raise key business risks to our Board, call special meetings of our Board when necessary to address critical issues, and focus our Board’s attention on areas of concern. The Chairman of the Board, independent committee chairs and other directors also are experienced professionals or executives who can and do raise issues for board consideration and review, and are not hesitant to challenge management. Our Board of Directors believes there is a well-functioning and effective balance between the Chairman of the Board, non-executive board members and the Chief Executive Officer, which enhances risk oversight.

In addition, while we retain an independent Chairman of the Board, our Board of Directors believes that the Chairman of Board should not serve on the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. As such, we anticipate that our current Chairman of the Board, Mr. Steffensen, will not serve on any of the independent committees after our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Our Board of Directors exercises its oversight responsibility for risk both directly and through three of its standing committees. Throughout the year, our Board of Directors and each committee spend a portion of their time reviewing and discussing specific risk topics. The full Board is kept informed of each committee’s risk oversight and related activities through regular oral reports from the committee chairs, and committee meeting minutes are available for review by all directors. Strategic, operational and competitive risks also are presented and discussed at our Board’s quarterly meetings, and more often as needed. On at least an annual basis, our Board conducts a review of our long-term strategic plans and members of senior management report on our top risks and the steps management has taken or will take to mitigate these risks. In addition, at each quarterly meeting, or more often as necessary, the General Counsel updates the board on material legal and regulatory matters. On a regular basis between Board meetings, our Chief Executive Officer provides written reports to our Board on the critical issues we face and recent developments in each of our principal operating areas. These reports include a discussion of business risks as well as a discussion regarding enterprise risk.

The Board of Directors nominates directors for election at each Annual Meeting of Stockholders and elects new directors to fill vacancies when they arise. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the responsibility to identify, evaluate, recruit and recommend qualified candidates to the Board of Directors for nomination or election.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a policy and process regarding consideration of director candidates recommended by stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews suggestions for director candidates recommended by stockholders and considers such candidates for recommendation based upon an appropriate balance of knowledge, experience and capability. The assessment of candidates include the candidates relevant industry experience, general business experience, relevant financial experience, interpersonal and communication skills, as well as the candidates roles and contributions that are valuable to the business community, personal qualities of leadership, character, judgment and whether the candidate possesses and maintains throughout service on the Board a reputation in the community at large of integrity, trust, respect, competence and adherence to the highest ethical standards. In addition to considering an appropriate balance of knowledge, experience and capability, the Board of Directors has as an objective that its membership be composed of experienced and dedicated individuals with diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, skills and other individual qualities that contribute to Board heterogeneity. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee selects candidates for director based on their character, judgment, diversity of experience, relevance of experience, business acumen, interpersonal and communication skills, and ability to act on behalf of all stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that nominees for director should have experience, such as experience in management or accounting and finance, or industry and technology knowledge, that may be useful to SYNNEX and the Board of Directors, high personal and professional ethics, and the willingness and ability to devote sufficient time to effectively carry out his or her duties as a director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes it appropriate for at least one, and, preferably, multiple, members of the Board of Directors to meet the criteria for an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules, and for a majority of the members of the Board of Directors to meet the definition of “independent director” under the rules of the NYSE. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also believes it appropriate for certain key members of our management to participate as members of the Board of Directors.

Prior to each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies nominees first by reviewing the current directors whose term expires at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and who are willing to continue in service. These candidates are evaluated based on the criteria described above, including each candidate’s demonstrated prior service as a director, and the needs of the Board of Directors with respect to the particular talents and experience of its directors. In the event that a director does not wish to continue in service, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines not to nominate the director, or a vacancy is created on the Board of Directors as a result of a resignation, an increase in the size of the Board of Directors or other event, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider various candidates for Board of Directors membership, including those suggested by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members, by other Board of Directors members, by any executive search firm engaged by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and by stockholders. A stockholder who wishes to suggest a prospective nominee for the Board of Directors should notify SYNNEX’ Corporate Secretary, any member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or the persons referenced below in “Communications with the Board of Directors” in writing with any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate.

In addition, our Bylaws contain provisions that address the process by which a stockholder may nominate an individual to stand for election to the Board of Directors at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders. In order to nominate a candidate for director, a stockholder must give timely notice in writing to SYNNEX’ Corporate Secretary and otherwise comply with the provisions of our Bylaws. To be timely, SYNNEX’ Bylaws provide that SYNNEX must have received the stockholder’s notice not less than 120 days prior to the scheduled date of such meeting. However, if notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders is given or made to stockholders less than 100 days prior to the meeting date, SYNNEX must receive the stockholder’s notice by the close of business on the 7th day after the earlier of the day SYNNEX mailed notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders date or provided such public disclosure of the meeting date. Information required by the Bylaws to be in the notice include the name and contact information for the candidate and the person making the nomination and other information about the nominee that must be disclosed in proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the related rules and regulations under that Section.

Stockholder nominations must be made in accordance with the procedures outlined in, and include the information required by, our Bylaws and must be addressed to: Corporate Secretary, SYNNEX Corporation, 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California 94538. You can obtain a copy of our Bylaws by writing to the Corporate Secretary at this address.

The Board of Directors has a process for stockholders and other interested persons to send communications to directors. If you wish to communicate with your Board of Directors as a whole or to non-management directors, you may send your communication in writing to: Gregory Quesnel, Chairman of the Audit Committee, SYNNEX Corporation, 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California 94538 or Jorge A. del Calvo, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, 2475 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, California 94304. You must include your name and address in the written communication and indicate whether you are a stockholder or other interested person of SYNNEX. Messrs. Quesnel or del Calvo will review any communication received from a stockholder or other interested person, and all material communications from stockholders or other interested persons will be forwarded to the appropriate director or directors or committee of the Board of Directors based on the subject matter.

The following tables set forth the compensation amounts paid to each non-employee director for their service in fiscal year ended November 30, 2010:

For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, each non-employee director received an annual cash retainer fee of $30,000 and an additional $2,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended regardless of form of attendance, $2,000 for each committee meeting attended in-person, and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended by telephone, video or other non-in-person attendance. The committee chair for the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an annual retainer fee of $7,500 and $5,000, respectively. The Audit Committee Chair received an annual retainer fee of $10,000. In addition, the Lead Director received an annual cash retainer fee of $30,000 and the Chairman of the Board of Directors received an annual cash retainer fee of $100,000. The Lead Director annual cash retainer and the Chairman of the Board of Directors annual cash retainer were prorated in June 2010 due to the retirement of Mr. Huang as Chairman of the Board of Directors and as a member of the Board of Directors and the subsequent appointment of Mr. Steffensen as non-executive Chairman of the Board and his relinquishment of his role as Lead Director. Non-employee directors are expected to receive the same compensation during the fiscal year ending November 30, 2011. All directors are reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in serving on the Board of Directors or any committee of the Board of Directors.

Directors had previously been eligible to receive stock options under our 1997 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and our Special Executive Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan. Currently, directors are eligible to receive equity incentives, in the form of stock options and restricted stock awards, under our Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (2003 Stock Incentive Plan). Each non-employee director who is first elected as a non-employee director receives 2,000 shares of restricted stock (Initial Restricted Stock Award) and an option to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock on the date he or she joined the Board of the Directors. One quarter of the Initial Restricted Stock Award will vest on the last day of each quarter following the date of the grant over a period of one year, subject to earlier termination following the director’s cessation of Board of Directors service for any reason. The options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, and have a term of 10 years, subject to earlier termination following the director’s cessation of Board of Directors service. The options vest over three years, of which 33.3% of the shares vest upon the first anniversary of the vesting start date and the remaining shares vest monthly thereafter over the remaining two-year period.

Prior to March 21, 2011, following each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each of our continuing non-employee directors was awarded 2,000 shares of restricted stock (Annual Restricted Stock Award) under our 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, provided such individual had served on the Board of Directors for at least six months. One quarter of the Annual Restricted Stock Award vested on the last day of each quarter following the date of the grant over a period of one year, subject to earlier termination following the director’s cessation of Board of Directors service for any reason. After March 21, 2011, following each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each of our continuing non-employee directors will be awarded the equivalent value of $90,000 of restricted stock (Annual Value Restricted Stock Award) under our 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, provided such individual has served on the Board of Directors for at least six months. One quarter of the Annual Value Restricted Stock Award will vest on the last day of each quarter following the date of the grant over a period of one year, subject to earlier termination following the director’s cessation of Board of Directors service for any reason.

In addition, prior to March 21, 2011, we requested each current member of the Board of Directors to hold an equity position in SYNNEX of at least an aggregate of 5,000 shares of common stock, whether vested or unvested, or vested in-the-money stock options on the date of each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, commencing on the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. For any new director, we requested that he or she hold an equity position in SYNNEX of at least an aggregate of 5,000 shares of common stock, whether vested or unvested, or vested in-the-money stock options on the date of each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, commencing on the third Annual Meeting of Stockholders held following his or her initial election. After March 21, 2011, we request each current member of the Board of Directors, who was elected prior to the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to hold an equity position in SYNNEX of the equivalent value of at least $250,000 of common stock, whether vested or unvested, or vested in-the-money stock options on the date of each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, commencing on the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. For any new director elected after the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders we will request that he or she hold an equity position in SYNNEX of the equivalent value of at $250,000 of common stock, whether vested or unvested, or vested in-the-money stock options on the date of each Annual Meeting of Stockholders, commencing on the third Annual Meeting of Stockholders held following his or her initial election.

In fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, Robert Huang received $216,923 based upon his Chairman of the Board responsibilities and his leadership of our global business services division. Mr. Huang also received a grant of 2,000 shares of restricted stock for his services as a director of SYNNEX, consistent with that received by other directors of our Board. Mr. Huang’s fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 compensation was based primarily upon his non-executive back-up role to Mr. Murai in the event Mr. Murai were unable to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer and certain time commitments devoted to SYNNEX as Chairman of SYNNEX. In June 2010, Mr. Huang retired from the Board of Directors. In connection with his retirement, we agreed to accelerate the vesting of Mr. Huang's outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards such that these outstanding equity awards were fully vested as of the date of his retirement. In addition, Mr. Huang's stock options will remain exercisable for a period of twenty-four months following his retirement or until the expiration of the term of such options, if earlier. In fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, Matthew Miau received the standard retainer, meeting attendance fees and equity compensation as other outside directors. Any future compensation payable to Mr. Miau will be based upon the approval of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is composed of disinterested members of the Board of Directors.

Fred Breidenbach (Chairman), Dwight Steffensen, James Van Horne, Duane Zitzner and Andrea Zulberti served as members of the Compensation Committee for fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. None of the members of the Compensation Committee has served as an officer or been an employee of SYNNEX and we do not have any related person transactions with any of the members of the Compensation Committee. In addition, our Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Breidenbach, Steffensen, Van Horne and Zitzner and Ms. Zulberti have no material relationship with us and that each of these directors is an independent director. None of our executive officers serves on the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

We have a business relationship with MiTAC International Corporation, or MiTAC International, a publicly-traded company in Taiwan, that began in 1992 when it became our primary investor through its affiliates. As of February 9, 2011, MiTAC International and its affiliates beneficially owned approximately 29% of our common stock. In addition, Matthew Miau, the Chairman Emeritus of our Board of Directors, is the Chairman of MiTAC International a director or officer of MiTAC International’s affiliates. As a result, MiTAC International generally has significant influence over us and over the outcome of all matters submitted to stockholders for consideration, including any of our mergers or acquisitions. Among other things, this could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change of control over us with the loss of any premium that stockholders otherwise might receive in connection with such a transaction.

Until July 31, 2010, we worked with MiTAC International on OEM outsourcing and jointly marketed MiTAC International’s design and electronic manufacturing services and our contract assembly capabilities. This relationship enabled us to build relationships with MiTAC International’s customers. On July 31, 2010, MiTAC International purchased certain assets related to our contract assembly business including inventory and customer contracts, primarily related to customers then being jointly served by MiTAC International and us. The value of the inventory sold was $68.1 million. No gain or loss was recognized on this transaction during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. As part of this transaction, we provide MiTAC International certain transition services for the business for a fee of $0.3 million per month over a period of twelve months. During the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, we received $1.0 million in service fees. In addition, during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, we received $1.0 million in reimbursements for facilities and overhead costs. The sale agreement also includes earn-out and profit sharing provisions, which are based on operating performance metrics, achieved over twelve to eighteen months from the closing date, for the defined customers included in this transaction.

We purchased inventories, including notebook computers, motherboards and other peripherals, from MiTAC International and its affiliates totaling $157.1 million, $312.4 million and $261.6 million during fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our sales to MiTAC International and its affiliates during fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 totaled $5.6 million, $2.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively. Most of these purchases and sales were pursuant to our Master Supply Agreement with MiTAC International and Sun Microsystems, formerly one of our contract assembly customers. In fiscal year 2010, Oracle Corporation acquired Sun Microsystems and all of our contract assembly services to Oracle Corporation were covered by this Master Supply Agreement.

Our business relationship with MiTAC International had been informal and was not governed by long-term commitments or arrangements with respect to pricing terms, revenue or capacity commitments.

During the time period that we worked with MiTAC International we negotiated manufacturing, pricing and other material terms on a case-by-case basis with MiTAC International and our contract assembly customers for a given project. While MiTAC International is a related party and a controlling stockholder, we believe that the significant terms under these agreements, including pricing, would not materially differ from the terms we could have negotiated with unaffiliated third parties, and we have adopted a policy requiring that material transactions with MiTAC International or its related parties be approved by our Audit Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors. In addition, Matthew Miau’s compensation is approved by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is also composed solely of independent directors. As MiTAC International’s ownership interest in us decreases as a result of sales of our stock and additional dilution, our interest in the success of the business and operations may decrease as well.

As noted above, MiTAC International and its affiliates in the aggregate beneficially owned approximately 29.2% of our common stock as of February 9, 2011. These are owned by the following MiTAC affiliates:

While the ownership structure of these MiTAC International and its affiliates is complex, it has not had a material adverse effect on our business in the past, and we do not expect it do so in the future.

During fiscal years 2007 and 2008, we purchased shares of MiTAC International related to the deferred compensation plan of Robert Huang, our then President and Chief Executive Officer and in 2009, we had no such purchases. As of February 9, 2011, the value of the stock acquired was approximately $1,008,000. Except as described herein, none of our officers or directors has an interest in MiTAC International or its affiliates.

Synnex Technology International is a publicly-traded corporation in Taiwan that currently provides distribution and fulfillment services to various markets in Asia and Australia, and is also our potential competitor. Neither MiTAC International nor Synnex Technology International is restricted from competing with us.

We have entered into several additional agreements with MiTAC International. These agreements do not constitute contracts or obligations by any party to purchase products or services from the other parties, nor do they restrict our ability to conduct our business, except where so noted below. Accordingly, we do not believe that the termination of any of these agreements would have a material adverse effect on our business. Pursuant to these agreements, the terms for contracted services or purchased products are individually negotiated and, if agreed upon by the parties, such terms are included in a purchase order. We believe that the terms of each of these agreements are materially no less favorable to us than the terms we could have negotiated with unaffiliated third parties. In the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 we paid an aggregate of approximately $55.3 million to MiTAC International under the agreements described below.

Logistics Services Agreements with MiTAC Digital Corp. In March 2010, we entered into a logistical services agreement with MiTAC Digital Corp. Pursuant to the agreement, we provide certain reverse logistics services related to products returned by MiTAC Digital’s customers in Canada. The agreement has an initial term of two years and automatically renews for subsequent one year terms. The agreement may be terminated without cause either by the mutual written agreement of the parties or, following the initial two year term, by either party without cause upon 90 days prior written notice of termination to the other party.

Distribution Agreement. In April 2009, we entered into a distribution agreement with MiTAC Digital Corp. Pursuant to the agreement, we may purchase certain MiTAC Digital products for distribution in the United States. The agreement has an initial term of one year and automatically renews for subsequent one year terms. The agreement may be terminated without cause by either party upon 90 days prior written notice of termination to the other party.

Services Agreement with MiTAC International and Hitachi, Ltd. This agreement, dated July 2007, governs contracted configuration-to-order services, warranty services and systems services provided by MiTAC International and us to Hitachi, Ltd. and its affiliates. The agreement has an initial term of three years and will automatically renew for subsequent one year terms. Any party may terminate the agreement upon written notice provided at least 180 days prior to expiration of the then current term.

Services Agreement with MiTAC International. In June 2007, we entered into this services agreement by which we agreed to provide customer service and product support services to MiTAC International end users. The agreement has an initial term of one year and automatically renews for subsequent one year terms. The agreement may be terminated with or without cause by either party upon 30 days prior written notice of termination to the other party.

Manufacturing Agreement with MiTAC International and Dot Hill Systems Corporation. In January 2007, we entered into this agreement by which MiTAC International and we agreed to manufacture product for Dot Hills Systems. The agreement has an initial term of two years and automatically renews for subsequent one year terms.

Distribution Agreement—Stocking. In October 2006, we entered into a distribution and stocking agreement with MiTAC International. Pursuant to the agreement, we may purchase certain MiTAC International products for distribution in the United States. The agreement had an initial term of one year and automatically renews for subsequent one year terms. The agreement may be terminated without cause either by the mutual written agreement of both parties or by either party without cause upon 30 days prior written notice of termination to the other party.

Logistical Distribution Agreement. In July 2004, we entered into a logistical distribution agreement with MiTAC International. Pursuant to the agreement, we may purchase certain MiTAC International products for distribution in Canada. The agreement had an initial term of one year and automatically renews for subsequent one year terms. The agreement may be terminated without cause either by the mutual written agreement of both parties or by either party without cause upon 90 days prior written notice of termination to the other party.

Joint Sales and Marketing Agreement with MiTAC International. In May 2002, we entered into a joint sales and marketing agreement with MiTAC International. Pursuant to the agreement, both parties agree to use their commercially reasonable efforts to promote the other party’s capabilities to their respective customers who are interested in such product offerings. The agreement had an initial term of one year and automatically renews for subsequent one year terms unless either party provides written notice of non-renewal within 90 days of the end of any renewal term. The agreement may also be terminated without cause either by the mutual written agreement of both parties or by either party without cause upon 90 days prior written notice of termination to the other party.

On August 31, 2010, we sold our controlling interests in Nihon Daikou Shouji Co., Ltd., or NDS for $3.1 million to SB Pacific Corporation Limited, or SB Pacific, a newly formed company, led by our founder and former Chairman, Robert Huang. Concurrently, we acquired a 33.3% noncontrolling interest in SB Pacific. On December 1, 2010, we and SB Pacific acquired 70% and 30%, respectively, of the capital stock of Marubeni Infotec Corporation, now known as SYNNEX Infotec Corporation, for an aggregate of US$8.4 million subject to certain post closing adjustments. This acquisition is in the distribution segment and is expected to enable expansion into Japan. Mr. Huang is the Chief Executive Officer of SYNNEX Infotec Corporation.

During the 2010 fiscal year, we paid $0.2 million in management fees to SB Pacific.

We have adopted a policy requiring material transactions relating to related person transactions to be approved by our Audit Committee, which is composed of disinterested members of the Board of Directors.

The following table sets forth certain information as of February 9, 2011, as to shares of our common stock beneficially owned by: (i) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each of our executive officers listed in the 2010 Summary Compensation Table on page 27, (iii) each of our directors and (iv) all our current directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise stated below, the address of each beneficial owner listed on the table is c/o SYNNEX Corporation, 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California 94538. The percentage of common stock beneficially owned is based on 36,308,319 shares outstanding as of February 9, 2011.

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for SYNNEX’ executive compensation policies as provided in a written charter adopted by your Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee is empowered to review and approve the compensation and compensation procedures for the executive officers.

Our compensation philosophy is to pay for performance as well as to offer competitive compensation in order to attract and retain talented executive officers. With respect to “pay for performance,” our program is designed to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders, for whom they work. A significant portion of an executive officer’s total compensation depends on his or her performance relative to operational and financial objectives. In particular, in determining total compensation, we stress a compensation philosophy that is performance-driven with relatively low base salaries, but high variability through our Profit Sharing Plan and equity compensation. We believe that the foregoing portion should be at risk. As a result, a substantial portion of an executive officer’s total compensation is in the form of profit sharing and equity grants.

We believe that the compensation of our executive officers should reflect their success as a management team, as well as individuals, in attaining key operating objectives, such as growth of sales, growth of operating earnings and earnings per share, growth or maintenance of market share, long-term competitive advantage, and ultimately, in attaining an increased market price for our common stock. We believe that the performance of our executive officers in managing SYNNEX, considered in light of general economic conditions, our company and industry, and competitive conditions, should be the basis for determining their overall compensation.

We also believe that their compensation should not be based on the short-term performance of our stock, whether favorable or unfavorable, as we expect the price of our stock will, in the long-term, reflect our operating performance, and ultimately, the management of SYNNEX by our executive officers. We seek to have the long-term performance of our stock reflected in executive compensation through our stock option, restricted stock and other equity incentive programs.

Competitive compensation is important if we are to attract and retain the talent necessary to lead SYNNEX in the competitive and changing business environment in which we operate. In this regard, we are mindful of the median level of compensation of our competitors as well as of the median level of compensation in the local area in which the executive is located. We strive for internal equity among employees according to job responsibilities, experience, capability, and individual performance. Our executive compensation program impacts all employees by setting general levels of compensation and helping to create an environment of goals, rewards and expectations. As we believe the performance of every employee is important to our success, we are mindful of the effect that our executive compensation and incentive program has on all of our employees.

The differences in compensation between the various executive officers are based primarily upon individual differences in job responsibility, contribution and performance. For example, an executive with responsibility over a larger geography will have potential for greater compensation than an executive with responsibility over a smaller geography. Similarly, an executive with responsibility over a broader, more difficult or more profitable business unit or corporate division will have potential for greater compensation than an executive with responsibility over a narrower, less difficult or less profitable business unit or corporate division.

Our compensation philosophy emphasizing performance permeates total compensation for both executive officers and non-executive employees. While we do not have an exact formula for allocating between cash and non-cash compensation, we try to balance long-term equity versus short-term cash compensation and variable compensation versus fixed compensation. As noted above, executive officers who have greater ability to influence the performance of SYNNEX receive more long-term equity as a percentage of total compensation than non-executive employees who have less ability to influence the performance of SYNNEX. Similarly, performance related cash compensation for such executive officers as a percentage of total compensation is greater than performance related cash compensation of non-executive employees. The goal is to create a balanced culture of high performance without undue risk assumption.

To promote the objectives of our compensation philosophy, our compensation program consists of the following five principal elements:

The first three elements, base salary, Profit Sharing Plan, and equity grants, are usually administered in three cycles. Merit raises for base salaries are generally performed in the April-May period. Equity grants are generally awarded in the September-October period. Profit Sharing Plan bonuses are generally paid in the December-January period. However, all of the above elements are reviewed and determined on at least an annual basis by the Compensation Committee.

Base Salary. Base salaries are designed to provide a consistent cash flow throughout the year as compensation for day-to-day responsibilities; however, we maintain relatively low base salaries to incent executive officers to achieve the Profit Sharing Plan targets and thus create a performance driven environment. As will be further discussed below, our Compensation Committee set reasonably difficult minimum Profit Sharing Plan hurdles and performance metrics and amended the Profit Sharing Plan to include a compensation recoupment provision to mitigate the potential for such undue risk assumption. In addition, base salaries for our executive officers are reviewed and, if deemed appropriate, adjusted on an annual basis. Merit increases are based on, among other things, individual performance, any new responsibilities assumed and the magnitude of our merit increase budget for the year. Determination of base salary is not made in accordance with a strict formula that measures weighted qualitative and quantitative factors, but rather is based on objective data synthesized to competitive ranges and to internal policies and practices.

In March 2010 and June 2010, our Compensation Committee considered and discussed the 2010 base salaries for our executive officers. There were minimal base salary increases in 2010 for our executive officers named in the table below entitled “2010 Summary Compensation Table.” While the Compensation Committee considered a number of factors, including the individual officer’s performance level during the prior year, the executive officer’s base compensation level during the prior year, individual achievements of that executive officer, the base salary paid to the executive officer’s internal peers and the base salaries for that position at comparable companies in the industries with respect to that position, the Compensation Committee believed that minimal base salary increases were warranted due to the difficult and unstable economic environment. As noted above, the Compensation Committee was mindful of the effect of our compensation and incentive program on all of our employees and therefore determined to keep executive base salaries relatively flat.

Based on comparable companies in our industries, the base salary of each of our named executive officers for 2010 was below the 25^th percentile base salary levels for the comparable positions in our peer group.

Profit Sharing Plan. Profit Sharing Plan bonuses reward individuals for achieving operating and financial goals, in keeping with a performance-driven environment conducive to increasing stockholder value. Under our Profit Sharing Plan, we accrued a certain percentage of our pre-tax, before profit sharing accrual, profits for possible bonuses. Bonuses granted to executive officers under our Profit Sharing Plan are determined by our Compensation Committee based upon both qualitative and quantitative considerations.

For fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, bonuses to executive officers were based upon the achievement of certain threshold net income per share target performance percentages, as well as upon assessments of individual performance. While our Compensation Committee primarily focused upon net income per share target performance metrics to measure performance with respect to the Profit Sharing Plan, our Compensation Committee monitored other quantifiable performance metrics, such as return on invested capital, to mitigate the potential for undue risk assumption. In determining the net income per share target performance metrics, we focused upon our growth, return on equity, return on invested capital, and earnings per share. The minimum threshold target performance percentage was 75% and the maximum target performance percentage was 130% for all executive officers. If the minimum threshold target performance percentages of the internally established net income per share goal were not achieved, no bonuses would be paid to the executive officers. The minimum threshold target performance percentages were based on the previous year’s internally established net income per share goal plus a reasonable “stretch” goal based upon the difficult and challenging economic environment. Alternatively, if the maximum target performance percentages of the internally established net income per share goal were exceeded, no incremental bonuses beyond the maximum award would be paid to the executive officers.

If the applicable minimum threshold percentage was met, the actual bonus was paid based on a sliding scale of the target performance percentage actually achieved and dollar limits established by the Compensation Committee for such executive officer. Each of our executive officers had a minimum target under our Profit Sharing Plan of a certain percentage of his annual base salary for the 2010 fiscal year as follows:

There was potential for actual awards under the plan to either exceed or be less than such minimum target depending upon corporate performance, as well as the executive officer’s performance of certain individual goals that were predetermined by our President and Chief Executive Officer. Except for Mr. Murai, our Compensation Committee had discretion to increase or decrease the bonus by up to 30% for all executive officers whose compensation was not subject to the tax deduction limitations of Section 162(m), and decrease the bonus by up to 30% for all other executive officers whose compensation was subject to Section 162(m). Our Compensation Committee’s discretion is exercised based upon discussions with Mr. Murai, taking into account his ability to manage and monitor the performance of the other named executive officers.

Based on comparable companies in our industries, the total cash compensation targets, including both base salary and Profit Sharing Plan bonus, excluding any recommended adjustments by the Compensation Committee, for our executive officers for comparable positions in our industry peer groups for fiscal year 2010 were as follow:

For fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, we achieved a net income per share of $3.58 per diluted share, which exceeded the minimum threshold and as a result our executive officers received the following bonuses:

For fiscal year ending November 30, 2011, the Compensation Committee approved a similar profit sharing program under the Profit Sharing Plan, subject to stockholder approval of an amendment as described under Proposal 3 below, with threshold net income per share increased higher than fiscal year 2010 goals. We believe that the fiscal year 2011 goals represent reasonably difficult hurdles to incent our executive officers to achieve returns for our stockholders, considered in light of general economic conditions, our company and industry, and competitive conditions. In our judgment, there is a reasonable probability of attaining this minimum threshold. The maximum hurdles, on the other hand, are set at levels exceeding the prior year and are intended to incentivize our executive officers to increase stockholder return by setting a relatively high net income goal. As noted above, in setting the maximum hurdles, the Compensation Committee considered our growth, return on equity, return on invested capital and earnings per share. Lastly, as noted in Proposal 2 below, the Compensation Committee approved an amendment to our Profit Sharing Plan to include a compensation recoupment provision to be implemented upon stockholder approval.

Equity Grants. Long-term incentives involve equity grants, including restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit grants and stock option grants. Restricted stock and restricted stock units help us to retain key personnel, whereas stock options provide incentive for creating incremental stockholder value. The value of equity grants derives from stock price, which aligns executive compensation with stockholder value.

Equity grants are based on a number of considerations. The Compensation Committee’s determination with respect to stock option grants, restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit grants to executive officers for fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 can be viewed from two perspectives: our company and our employee. From our company’s perspective, the Compensation Committee considered the following principal elements:

From our employees’ perspective, the Compensation Committee considered the following principal elements:

Determination of equity grant amounts is not made in accordance with a strict formula that measures weighted qualitative and quantitative factors, but rather is based on objective data synthesized to competitive ranges and to internal policies and practices, including an overall review of both employee and corporate performance and the value of equity grants of comparable officers at comparable companies, including Arrow Electronics, Inc., Avnet, Inc., Ingram Micro Inc., Insight Enterprises, ScanSource, Inc. and Tech Data Corporation. We evaluate our corporate performance objective primarily by our financial performance, including growth, return on equity, return on invested capital, and earnings per share. Equity grants may also be made to new executive officers upon commencement of employment and, on occasion, to executive officers in connection with a significant change in job responsibility. We also distinguish between equity grants of stock options and restricted stock based upon the officer’s position. We believe that stock options carry more risk than restricted stock. As such, we expect certain officers to accept more equity risk and their grants are more heavily weighted towards stock options rather than restricted stock awards.

To further ensure that the long-term interests of executive officers and Senior Vice Presidents are closely aligned with those of stockholders, we request that they, except Mr. Murai, hold an equity position in SYNNEX of at least one times his or her annual total cash compensation. This equity position can be satisfied by holding shares of common stock, whether vested or unvested, or vested in-the-money stock options. With respect to Mr. Murai, he is expected not to sell vested equity compensation (with the exception of shares sold or withheld by us to cover any exercise price or taxes on such compensation) until he achieves ownership of an amount of our common stock having a fair market value of at least two times the sum of his annual base salary plus target bonus as in effect from time to time. Mr. Murai is expected to maintain this minimum level of ownership thereafter. Stock ownership for Mr. Murai’s purpose includes common stock owned personally or in trust for his benefit, but does not include unvested restricted stock or stock units, or unexercised stock options.

In addition, to avoid any impropriety or even the appearance of such, the Compensation Committee makes equity grants only during open trading windows. If the date of an equity grant falls within a trading black-out period, then the effective grant date is upon the expiration of the third trading day after the trading black-out period ends. The exercise price is the market closing price of our common stock on the effective grant date. In addition, equity grants to executive officers are generally awarded each year in the September-October period. We believe that the automatic and consistent nature of our equity grant process avoids the possibility of timing deviations.

Deferred Compensation Plan. Our deferred compensation plan permits designated employees to accumulate income for retirement and other personal financial goals by deferring present income through a nonqualified plan. Our deferred compensation plan became effective on January 1, 1994 and was amended on January 7, 2008 to conform with changes required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code). Currently, none of our executive officers participate in this plan.

Benefits, Perquisites and Other. Other benefits to our executive officers include medical, dental and life insurance, as well as 401(k) plan participation. Except for some non-material perquisites, these benefits are generally available to all our employees.

We believe these benefits to be reasonable and competitive. We have not established policies regarding recovery of awards in the event of a restatement of earnings.

President and Chief Executive Officer. Kevin Murai, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director, joined us in March 2008. Mr. Murai’s base salary has remained $500,000 per year. Mr. Murai also received a bonus of $1,647,000 under our 2010 Profit Sharing Plan, a stock option grant of 60,000 shares, and a restricted stock award of 15,000 shares. Some of the primary factors affecting Mr. Murai’s compensation include, among other things, comparative compensation of competitor companies and his overall leadership of the company. In addition, Mr. Murai was responsible for the overall strategy and performance of the Company, including year over year increases in net income from continuing operations and earnings per share from continuing operations of 36% and 29%, respectively, and growth of annual return on invested capital to 10.3%, a rate well above our cost of capital. Also, Mr. Murai is instrumental in the development of other executives and instills his vision of the Company across the spectrum of all employees.

President, US Distribution. Peter Larocque has served as our President, U.S. Distribution since July 2006 and previously served as Executive Vice President of Distribution from June 2001 to July 2006, and Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing from September 1997 until June 2001. Mr. Larocque is responsible for our U.S. distribution business. Mr. Larocque’s base salary remained substantially the same at $333,000 per year in fiscal year 2010. Mr. Larocque also received a bonus of $1,168,000 under our 2010 Profit Sharing Plan, a stock option grant of 19,623 shares, a restricted stock award of 7,175 shares, and a performance equity grant of 50,000 restricted stock units. Some of the primary factors affecting Mr. Larocque’s compensation include, among other things, his contribution to the overall leadership of our company and his leadership of the sales and marketing function of our company in the United States. In addition, Mr. Larocque contributed substantially to the expansion of the Company’s product line card by adding 197 new vendors; leadership of several significant sales divisions, including audio-visual, consumer electronics, enterprise, integrated communications, and technology solutions; the organic growth of the U.S. distribution business; the integration of Jack of All Games, Inc. and Jack of All Games (Canada), Inc.; and the establishment and leadership of the VARnex reseller community.

Chief Operating Officer. Dennis Polk is our Chief Operating Officer and has served in this capacity since July 2006 and previously served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance since joining us in February 2002. Mr. Polk’s base salary remained substantially the same at $323,000 per year in fiscal year 2010. Mr. Polk also received a bonus of $940,000 under our 2010 Profit Sharing Plan, a stock option grant of 19,623 shares, a restricted stock award of 7,175 shares and a performance equity grant of 50,000 restricted stock units. Some of the primary factors affecting Mr. Polk’s compensation include, among other things, his contribution to the overall leadership of the company; his leadership of the operations function of the Company; his responsibility for the Company’s distribution operations; his responsibility for Company support departments, including financial operations, legal, mergers and acquisitions; and his responsibility for the Company’s China and Mexico operations. In addition, Mr. Polk contributed substantially to the disposition of the MiTAC International Corporation related contract assembly operations.

Chief Financial Officer. Thomas Alsborg is our Chief Financial Officer. He joined us in March 2007. Mr. Alsborg’s base salary remained substantially the same at $260,000 per year in fiscal year 2010. Mr. Alsborg also received a bonus of $550,000 under our 2010 Profit Sharing Plan, a stock option grant of 13,345 shares, and restricted stock awards totaling 4,449 shares. Some of the primary factors affecting Mr. Alsborg’s compensation include, among other things, his contribution to the overall leadership of the company and his leadership of the financial function of the company. In addition, Mr. Alsborg contributed substantially to the restructuring of the Company’s $100,000,000 credit facility and $400,000,000 securitization facility and the establishment of a subsidiary ¥10,000,000,000 credit facility.

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Simon Leung is our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and has served in this capacity since May 2001. Mr. Leung joined us in November 2000 as Corporate Counsel. Mr. Leung’s base salary was $223,000 per year in fiscal year 2010. Mr. Leung also received a bonus of $215,000 under our 2010 Profit Sharing Plan and a restricted stock award of 3,591 shares. Some of the primary factors affecting Mr. Leung’s compensation include, among other things, his contribution to the overall leadership of our company and his leadership of the legal and compliance functions of the company. In addition, Mr. Leung contributed substantially to the acquisitions of Aspire Technology Limited, e4e, Inc., Encover, Inc.; Jack of All Games, Inc. and Jack of All Games (Canada), Inc., and Marubeni Infotec Corporation; the restructuring of the Company’s $100,000,000 credit facility and $400,000,000 securitization facility; and the establishment of a subsidiary ¥10,000,000,000 credit facility.

Section 162(m) of the Code generally prohibits us from deducting the compensation of executive officers that exceeds $1,000,000 unless that compensation is contingent on the satisfaction of objective performance goals approved by our stockholders. Our 2010 Profit Sharing Plan, which was approved by our stockholders, and the proposed 2011 amendment, which is submitted for stockholder approval, are structured to permit bonus awards under that plan to qualify as performance-based compensation and to maximize the tax deductibility of such awards. However, we reserve the discretion to pay compensation to our executive officers that may not be deductible.

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for our executive compensation policies as provided in a written charter adopted by your Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee is empowered to review and approve the annual compensation and compensation procedures for our executive officers. The Compensation Committee does not delegate any of its functions to others in setting compensation.

Compensation Consultant and Peer Group Analysis. To assist in this process, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Compensia LLC as its compensation consultant for fiscal year 2010. Compensia reported directly to the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee directly approved the Compensia fees. Management had no role in the selection of the compensation consultant. Neither SYNNEX, nor the Compensation Committee engaged any compensation consultants during fiscal year 2010, whose fees exceeded $120,000. The Compensation Committee believes that the Compensia advice was independent of management, and Compensia has certified the same in writing, and benefited our company and stockholders. Compensia provided the Compensation Committee with a review of the overall compensation climate in the United States, best practices, and trends specific to our industry. Compensia provided analyses of base salaries, bonuses, long-term incentives and benefit practices of comparable companies in our electronics distribution industry, broad distribution industry and of technology companies more broadly defined with market capitalizations similar to that of SYNNEX.

The following industry peer companies and market capitalization peer companies were used in our competitive benchmarking:

In addition to talking to members of our Compensation Committee, Compensia also contacted certain of our executive officers and other employees in our human resources department to obtain historical data and insight into previous compensation practices. Our Compensation Committee took information provided by Compensia into consideration when setting executive compensation for fiscal year 2010 and used them as a basis for making changes to executive compensation for fiscal year 2011.

Tally Sheets and the Role of President and Chief Executive Officer. In fiscal year 2010, the Compensation Committee continued the practice of reviewing the total remuneration of the executive officers using summary tables, or tally sheets. These tally sheets allowed the Compensation Committee to undertake a comprehensive review across all forms of compensation, and to understand the effect that changing profit and stock price scenarios could have on such forms of remuneration.

Mr. Murai also made recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to the compensation of the other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee may accept or adjust such recommendations for these officers. However, in general, the Compensation Committee considered the recommendations of our President and Chief Executive Officer, the named executive officer’s role, responsibilities and performance during the past year, and the amount of compensation paid to named executive officers in similar positions at comparable companies. These recommendations were considered in relation to annual performance reviews and played an important role in the compensation determinations by the Compensation Committee. For Mr. Murai, the Compensation Committee solely determines the compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer based on a performance review and competitive benchmarking.

In general, we believe that the current executive compensation program meets the objectives of rewarding executive officers for measurable results in meeting and exceeding goals.

The following report of the Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by SYNNEX under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with SYNNEX’ management. Based on this review and these discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of SYNNEX that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in SYNNEX’ proxy statement on Schedule 14A and incorporated by reference into its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010.

Respectfully submitted on February 9, 2011, by the members of the Compensation Committee of your Board of Directors:

The following tables set forth compensation for services rendered in all capacities to us for the three fiscal years ended November 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010 for our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers as of November 30, 2010 whose total compensation for fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 exceeded $100,000, whom we refer to in this Proxy Statement as the named executive officers.

The following table sets forth information on grants of plan-based awards in fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 to the named executive officers.

Narrative to 2010 Summary Compensation Table and 2010 Grants Plan-Based Awards Table

See Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for a complete description of compensation plans pursuant to which the amounts listed under the 2010 Summary Compensation Table and 2010 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table were paid or awarded and the criteria for such payment, including targets for payment of annual incentives, as well as performance criteria on which such payments were based. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis also describes the options and restricted stock grants.

Except as otherwise noted, all stock awards and option awards vest over five years beginning on the grant date, with the first vesting occurring on the first anniversary of the grant date.

Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-of-Control Arrangements

The following summarizes our employment arrangement with our executive officers, including potential payments payable to our executive officers upon termination of employment or a change of control of us under their current employment agreements and our other compensation programs. The Compensation Committee may in its discretion revise, amend or add to these benefits if it deems advisable. Although much of the compensation for our executive officers is performance-based and largely contingent upon achievement of aggressive financial goals, our change of control arrangements provide important protection to our executive officers, are consistent with practice of our peer companies, and are appropriate for attraction and retention of executive talent.

Consistent with the practice of our peer companies, other compensation decisions are not generally based on the existence of this severance protection. We find it more equitable to offer severance benefits based on a standard formula relating to the executive officer’s title or title equivalent and tenure with the company because severance often serves as a bridge when employment is involuntarily terminated, and should therefore not be affected by other, longer-term accumulations.

Kevin Murai. On March 31, 2008, the Board of Directors appointed Kevin Murai as Co-Chief Executive Officer of SYNNEX. In connection with Mr. Murai’s employment with SYNNEX, Mr. Murai and our company executed an employment offer which provided for certain severance benefits. If we terminate Mr. Murai’s employment with our company after March 31, 2008 for a reason other than Cause, Disability or death, as such terms are defined in the employment offer, then Mr. Murai will receive the following severance benefits from us:

The receipt of any severance benefits will be subject to Mr. Murai signing and not revoking a release of claims in a form acceptable to the company within such period of time as we may require, but not to exceed 21 days following his termination of employment. The receipt of any such severance and change of control benefits will be subject to Mr. Murai not violating the non-competition and non-solicitation covenants of the agreement.

Other than as described above, the employment agreement of Mr. Murai does not provide for repricings or other material modifications of outstanding stock options or other equity-based awards; payment of dividends; material waiver or modification of any specified performance target, goal or condition to payout under any reported incentive payout plan or any formula with respect to level of annual base salary and bonus in proportion to total compensation.

Other Executive Officers. If any of the following categories of officers is terminated without cause within two months before or 12 months after a change of control of us (including a voluntary termination because of a reduction in salary or position or a relocation), the officer is entitled to the following:

Severance payments will be delayed for six months following termination of employment to the extent required by Section 409A.

Peter Larocque and Dennis Polk are classified in the Executive Vice President and above category of officers and Thomas Alsborg and Simon Leung are classified in the Senior Vice President and above category of officers. For these other executive officers, we believe that structuring their severance benefits in the above described fashion in connection with a change of control and tying each individual’s severance payment with his or her length of service with us, encourages their retention, rewards them for their individual contributions, loyalty, teamwork and integrity, and motivates them to achieve returns for our stockholders.

For each of these other executive officers, if their employment with us terminates as a result other than termination without cause within two months before or 12 months after a change of control of us, then they will not be entitled to receive the above severance benefits. They are entitled to receive compensation and benefits through the date of termination in accordance with our established plans.

The following table sets forth potential payments payable to our current executive officers upon termination of employment or a change of control. Our Compensation Committee may in its discretion revise, amend or add to the benefits if it deems advisable. The table below reflects amounts payable to our named executive officers assuming a change of control on, and/or their employment was terminated on November 30, 2010:

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity-based awards, including the potential dollar amounts realizable with respect to each award.

The following table sets forth the dollar amounts realized pursuant to the vesting or exercise of equity-based awards during the latest fiscal year.

None of our named executive officers participate in or have account balances in qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by us. The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of “outside directors” as defined for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, may elect to adopt qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans if the Compensation Committee determines that doing so is in our best interests.

As discussed above, we maintain a deferred compensation plan, which became effective on January 1, 1994. The deferred compensation plan is designed to permit designated officers and directors to accumulate additional income for retirement and other personal financial goals through a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that enables the officer or director to make elective deferrals of a specified amount of salary or bonus to which he or she will become entitled in the future. The balance in a participant’s account will be distributed in full after the earlier of their termination of employment with us or upon attaining the age of 65. The distribution may be paid in one lump sum or in equal monthly or annual installments over a period not to exceed 15 years. Under certain circumstances, a participant may receive an early distribution in the form of a lump sum payment, subject to certain penalties. As noted above, this plan was amended effective January 1, 2005 to conform with changes required under Section 409A of the Code. As a result, for account balances earned after 2004, distributions to officers upon termination of employment are generally subject to a six-month delay, and accelerated distributions are generally prohibited.

In January 2011, our Compensation Committee approved an amendment to our Executive Profit Sharing Plan (Profit Sharing Plan), subject to the approval of our stockholders at the Annual Meeting. The following summary of the principal features of the Profit Sharing Plan is qualified by reference to the terms of the Profit Sharing Plan, as amended, a copy of which is available without charge upon stockholder request to Corporate Secretary, SYNNEX Corporation, 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California 94538. The amendment to our Profit Sharing Plan has also been filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission together with this Proxy Statement, and can be accessed on the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.

The amendment to the Profit Sharing Plan approved by our Compensation Committee and submitted for stockholder approval consists of an increase in the maximum award a participant can receive under the Profit Sharing Plan in any fiscal year from $2 million to $3 million and the addition of a compensation recoupment provision.

The Compensation Committee is authorized to recover any award or portion thereof made in the previous 36 months to a participant in the event of a “recoverable event.” A recoverable event includes (i) a participant’s engagement in fraud or other intentional misconduct that is detrimental to the Company resulting in the participant’s termination of employment with the Company or (ii) payment of an award under the Profit Sharing Plan that is based on materially inaccurate financial results or performance metrics.

The Compensation Committee, may, in its sole discretion, take any or all of the following actions upon its determination that a recoverable event has occurred with respect to a participant: (i) cause the participant to forfeit any unpaid award as of the recoverable event and/or (ii) recover any and all awards earned and received or realized by the participant during the period commencing on the date of the occurrence of the recoverable event and ending on the date on which it determines that the recoverable event has occurred, but not to exceed the 36-month period preceding the date of such determination (with interest).

This compensation recoupment provision is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and shall apply notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Profit Sharing Plan.

All other material terms of the Profit Sharing Plan remain unchanged. If approved by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the amendment will be effective with respect to 2011 bonus awards and thereafter.

The Profit Sharing Plan was initially adopted by our Compensation Committee in January 2009 and first approved by our stockholders in March 2009, and last amended by our Compensation Committee in January 2011, subject to stockholder approval.

The Profit Sharing Plan is designed to qualify as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, which requires that the program be subject to stockholder approval. Under Section 162(m), we may not receive a federal income tax deduction for compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or up to three additional executive officers whose total compensation is required to be reported in our Proxy Statement to the extent that any of these persons receives more than $1,000,000 in compensation in the taxable year. However, if we pay compensation that is “performance-based” under Section 162(m), we are generally entitled to a federal income tax deduction for the compensation paid even if such compensation exceeds $1,000,000 in a single year.

Participation in the Profit Sharing Plan is limited to those officers deemed by your Board of Directors to be executive officers under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

During the first ninety days of each fiscal year, our Compensation Committee will establish in writing specific performance goals for each participant, which must be achieved in order for an award to be earned under the Profit Sharing Plan for that fiscal year. Such performance goals may be based upon any one or more of the following: net income per share, revenue, cash flow, earnings per share, return on equity, total stockholder return, share price performance, return on capital, return on assets or net assets, income or net income, operating income or net operating income, operating profit or net operating profit, operating margin or profit margin, return on operating revenue, return on invested capital, sales productivity, sales growth, market segment share or similar financial performance measures as may be determined by the Compensation Committee.

Awards will be payable following the completion of the fiscal year upon certification by our Compensation Committee that we achieved the specified performance goals established for the participant. However, even if we attain the specified performance goals, the Compensation Committee has the discretion, for each participant, to reduce some or all of an award that would otherwise be paid to the participant. In no event may a participant receive an award of more than $3 million (including the increase subject to stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting) under the Profit Sharing Plan for any fiscal year. Payment of earned awards will be made in cash within two and one-half months after the end of the fiscal year.

For fiscal year 2011, bonuses to executive officers will be based upon the achievement of certain threshold net income per share target performance percentages with adjustments based upon achievement of certain return on invested capital performance. Both the threshold net income per share target and the threshold target performance percentages for fiscal year 2011 were increased from fiscal year 2010. A second performance metric based upon achievement of certain return on invested capital performance was also added to mitigate the potential for undue risk assumption. Executive officers will not be eligible for bonuses unless we meet or exceed these threshold target performance percentages of the internally established net income per share goal. The actual bonus payable, if the applicable minimum threshold percentage is met, will be paid upon a sliding scale of the target net income per share performance percentage actually achieved and dollar limits pre-established by the Compensation Committee for each individual executive officer. This amount is then adjusted by the percentage increase or decrease corresponding with the company’s performance as measured by the return on invested capital performance metric. In addition, our President and Chief Executive Officer has the discretion to recommend to the Compensation Committee that it decrease bonuses for all other executive officers whose compensation is subject to Section 162(m). The following table sets forth the bonuses that would have been paid to our named executive officers in fiscal year 2010 if the fiscal year 2011 performance targets and target percentages were in effect for fiscal year 2010.

As mentioned above, under the Profit Sharing Plan, executive officers would not have been eligible for bonuses unless we met or exceeded certain threshold target performance percentages of an internally established net income per share goal. As disclosed in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, threshold target performance percentages for all executive officers were 75%. The maximum bonus for each of our executive officers was based on achieving 130% of our threshold target performance, plus, for any executive officer not subject to the tax deduction limitations of Section 162(m), any recommendation to increase by up to an additional 30%. Except for the initial 75% threshold target performance percentage for the executive officers, the threshold target performance percentages and corresponding bonuses were paid based upon a sliding scale, rather than as cliffs, up to 130%.

Bonuses under the Profit Sharing Plan will be determined based on actual performance, so future actual awards, if any, cannot now be determined. The bonuses paid for fiscal year 2010 under our Profit Sharing Plan to our named executive officers are set forth in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the 2010 Summary Compensation Table contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

The Profit Sharing Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of outside directors as defined under Section 162(m) of the Code.

The Profit Sharing Plan may be amended from time to time, in whole or in part, by our Compensation Committee, but no amendment will be effective without stockholder approval if such approval is required to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code.

Approval of the amendment to the Profit Sharing Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and voting at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person or by proxy. Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted “FOR” approval of the amendment to our Profit Sharing Plan.

Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the amendment to our Profit Sharing Plan for Section 16(b) Officers.

The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) requires us to obtain an advisory vote (non-binding) from our stockholders on our executive compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, which is often referred to as a “say on pay” proposal.

As described in the “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, our executive compensation programs and policies play an important role in achieving our objective of sustainable long-term growth in stockholder value. As a guiding principle, our executive compensation programs and policies are designed to motivate, retain and reward our executives for superior short- and long-term performance for the Company and its stockholders.

We are asking that our stockholders indicate their support of our executive compensation as described in this proxy statement. While this advisory vote on executive compensation is non-binding, our Board and the Compensation Committee will review the outcome of this vote and take the vote into consideration when reviewing our compensation policies and procedures. This is not intended to address specific items of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and our executive compensation policies and procedures as described in this proxy statement. Stockholders who want to communicate with our Board of Directors should refer to “Communications with the Board of Directors” in this proxy statement for additional information.

At the Annual Meeting we will ask our stockholders to approve the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as described in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2010 Summary Compensation Table and the other compensation related tables and disclosure.”

Approval of our executive compensation, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2010 Summary Compensation Table and the other compensation related tables and disclosure as described in the “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and voting at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person or by proxy. Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted “FOR” approval.

Your Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of our executive compensation as described in this proxy statement.

The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act requires us to obtain an advisory vote (non-binding) from our stockholders indicating how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on our executive compensation, such as Proposal 3 included on page 37 of this proxy statement. By voting on this Proposal 4, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on our executive compensation once every one, two, or three years.

After careful consideration of this Proposal, our Board of Directors has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every three years is the most appropriate alternative for us, and therefore our Board of Directors recommends that you vote for a triennial advisory vote on executive compensation.

In formulating its recommendation, our Board of Directors considered that a triennial advisory vote on our executive compensation will provide our stockholders with direct input on our executive compensation, but also allow stockholders, our management and our Board of Directors time to evaluate the effects of our executive compensation policies and procedures. This approach will also provide us with time to implement improvements and changes to address any concerns reflected by a negative vote.

You may cast your vote for your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of one year, two years, three years or abstain from voting when you vote in response to the resolution set forth below.

“RESOLVED, that the option of once every one year, two years, or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast for this resolution will be determined to be the preferred frequency with which the Company is to hold a stockholder advisory vote to approve the Company’s executive compensation, as disclosed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules (which disclosure shall include the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the other related tables and disclosure).”

The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been selected by stockholders. However, because this vote is advisory and not binding on our Board of Directors or us in any way, our Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and us to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders.

Your Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the option of once every three years as the frequency with which our stockholders are provided an advisory vote on our executive compensation.

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Audit Committee, which is composed entirely of non-employee independent directors, has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accountants to audit our books, records and accounts and our subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2011. Your Board of Directors has endorsed this appointment. Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP by stockholders is not required by law. However, as a matter of good corporate practice, such selection is being submitted to the stockholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, but may retain PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such change would be in the best interests of SYNNEX and its stockholders. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP previously audited our consolidated financial statements during the three fiscal years ended November 30, 2008, 2009 and 2010. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. They will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered for us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009, were as follows:

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009, were for professional services rendered for the audits of our consolidated financial statements, statutory audits of our subsidiaries, reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. The aggregate fees for the year ended November 30, 2009 also included fees in connection with professional services rendered for the issuance of convertible senior notes and assistance in responding to comment letters from the SEC.

Audit Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed for the year ended November 30, 2010 were for professional services rendered relating to due diligence for mergers and acquisitions.

Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 were for professional services rendered relating to consulting services for state tax audit and related services.

All Other Fees. All other fees billed for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 were for an online accounting research tool subscription.

The Audit Committee has implemented pre-approval policies and procedures related to the provision of audit and non-audit services. Under these procedures, the Audit Committee pre-approves both the type of services to be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the estimated fees related to these services.

During the approval process, the Audit Committee considers the impact of the types of services and the related fees on the independence of the registered public accountants. The services and fees must be deemed compatible with the maintenance of such accountants’ independence, including compliance with SEC rules and regulations.

Throughout the year, the Audit Committee will review any revisions to the estimates of audit and non-audit fees initially approved.

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and voting at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person or by proxy. Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted “FOR” ratification of the appointment. In the event ratification is not obtained, your Audit Committee will review its future selection of our independent registered public accountants.

Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accountants.

The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by SYNNEX under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Audit Committee provides assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations in matters involving SYNNEX’ accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal compliance functions by approving the services performed by SYNNEX’ independent registered public accountants and reviewing their reports regarding SYNNEX’ accounting practices and systems of internal accounting controls as set forth in a written charter adopted by your Board of Directors. SYNNEX’ management is responsible for preparing SYNNEX’ financial statements and the independent registered public accountants are responsible for auditing those financial statements. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the conduct of these activities by SYNNEX’ management and the independent registered public accountants.

In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the independent registered public accountants. Management represented to the Audit Committee that SYNNEX’ consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent registered public accountants.

The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accountants matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 and No. 90 (Audit Committee Communications). In addition, the independent registered public accountants provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence) and the Audit Committee and the independent registered public accountants have discussed such accountants’ independence from SYNNEX and its management, including the matters in those written disclosures. Additionally, the Audit Committee considered whether the provision of non-audit services was compatible with maintaining such accountants’ independence. The Audit Committee has discussed with management the procedures for selection of consultants and the related competitive bidding practices and fully considered whether those services provided by the independent registered public accountants are compatible with maintaining such accountant independence.

The Audit Committee has discussed with SYNNEX’ internal and independent registered public accountants, with and without management present, their evaluations of SYNNEX’ internal accounting controls and the overall quality of SYNNEX’ financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions with management and the independent registered public accountants referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors has approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements in SYNNEX’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, for filing with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted on February 9, 2011, by the members of the Audit Committee of your Board of Directors:

If a stockholder wishes to present a proposal to be included in our Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proponent and the proposal must comply with the proxy proposal submission rules of the SEC. One of the requirements is that the proposal be received by the Corporate Secretary no later than October 25, 2011. Proposals we receive after that date will not be included in the Proxy Statement. We urge stockholders to submit proposals by Certified Mail—Return Receipt Requested.

A stockholder proposal not included in our proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be ineligible for presentation at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders unless the stockholder gives timely notice of the proposal in writing to the Corporate Secretary of SYNNEX at the principal executive offices of SYNNEX. Under our Bylaws, in order for a matter to be deemed properly presented by a stockholder, timely notice must be delivered to, or mailed and received by, us not less than 50 nor more than 75 days prior to the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders; provided, however, that in the event that less than 65 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders is given or made to stockholders, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not later than the earlier of (a) the close of business on the 15th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders was mailed or such public disclosure was made, whichever first occurs, and (b) two (2) days prior to the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The stockholder’s notice must set forth, as to each proposed matter, the following: (a) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and reasons for conducting such business at the meeting; (b) the name and address, as they appear on our books, of the stockholder proposing such business; (c) the class and number of shares of our securities that are beneficially owned by the stockholder; (d) any material interest of the stockholder in such business; and (e) any other information that is required to be provided by such stockholder pursuant to proxy proposal submission rules of the SEC. The presiding officer of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge any matter not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.

You may obtain a copy of the current rules for submitting stockholder proposals from the SEC at:

or through the Commission’s Internet web site: www.sec.gov. Request SEC Release No. 34-40018, May 21, 1998.

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required to furnish us with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms we have received and written representations from certain reporting persons that they filed all required reports, we believe that all of our officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during fiscal year ended November 30, 2010.

Your Board of Directors does not know of any other business that will be presented at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, your proxy holders will vote on it as they think best unless you direct them otherwise in your proxy instructions.

Whether or not you intend to be present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we urge you to submit your signed proxy promptly.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

/s/ Simon Y. Leung

Simon Leung

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

and Corporate Secretary

SYNNEX’ 2010 Annual Report has been mailed with this Proxy Statement. We will provide copies of exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, but will charge a reasonable fee per page to any requesting stockholder. Stockholders may make such request in writing to SYNNEX Corporation at 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, California 94538, Attention: Investor Relations. The request must include a representation by the stockholder that as of February 9, 2011, the stockholder was entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Kevin Murai, Dennis Polk and Simon Leung, and each of them, his true and lawful agents and proxies with full power of substitution in each, to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SYNNEX CORPORATION to be held at the offices of the Company and at any adjournments thereof and to vote with respect to the proposals set forth on the reverse side all shares of stock of SYNNEX CORPORATION the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box, SEE REVERSE SIDE. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the stockholder. IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE INDICATED, THE PROXIES WILL HAVE AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, FOR PROPOSAL 2, FOR PROPOSAL 3, FOR 3 YEARS ON PROPOSAL 4, FOR PROPOSAL 5 AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES ON ANY OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING. The proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this card.

(PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN THIS PROXY ON THE OTHER SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 21, 2011. The Proxy Statement, Letter to Stockholders and our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at: www.proxyease.com/synnex/2011

4. An advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on Executive Compensation.

5. Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accountants.

6. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Please sign exactly as your name appears on your stock certificate. If the stock is held by joint tenants or as community property, both should sign. Executors, administrators, trustees, guardians, attorneys and corporate officers should give their full titles.

Please have your 11 digit control number ready when voting by Internet or Telephone

Have your proxy card available when you access the above website. Follow the prompts to vote your shares.

Mark, sign, and date your proxy card, then detach it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.


¨		Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x		Definitive Proxy Statement

¨		Definitive Additional Materials

¨		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12


	Page
INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION		1

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS		3

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		17

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		19

PROPOSAL 2 APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE EXECUTIVE PROFIT SHARING PLAN		34

PROPOSAL 3 ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		37

PROPOSAL 4 ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		38

PROPOSAL 5 RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS		39

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE		41

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2012 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS		42

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE		42

OTHER MATTERS		43


*Audit Committee*

Number of Members:		4

Members:		Gregory Quesnel, Chairman and Audit Committee Financial Expert
		Dwight Steffensen, Audit Committee Financial Expert
		James Van Horne, Audit Committee Financial Expert Andrea Zulberti

Number of Meetings in fiscal year ended November 30, 2010:		8



Functions:		The Audit Committee provides assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations in matters involving our accounting, auditing, financial reporting, internal control and legal compliance functions by approving the services performed by our independent registered public accountants and reviewing their reports regarding our accounting practices and systems of internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee also oversees the audit efforts of our independent registered public accountants and takes those actions as it deems necessary to satisfy itself that the accountants are independent of management. The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the framework by which management discusses our risk profile and risk exposures with the full board and its committees. The Audit Committee meets regularly with our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Director of Internal Audit, independent auditor, General Counsel, and other members of senior management to discuss our major financial risk exposures, financial reporting, internal controls, credit and liquidity risk, compliance risk, key operational risks, and risk management framework and programs. Other responsibilities include at least annually reviewing the implementation and effectiveness of our compliance and ethics program and our business continuity plan and test results. The Audit Committee meets regularly in separate executive session with the Senior Director of Internal Audit and independent auditor, as well as with committee members only, to facilitate a full and candid discussion of risk and other issues.
*Compensation Committee*

Number of Members:		5

Members:		Fred Breidenbach, Chairman
		Dwight Steffensen
		James Van Horne
		Duane Zitzner
		Andrea Zulberti

Number of Meetings in fiscal year ended November 30, 2010:		8

Functions:		The Compensation Committee reviews and determines our general compensation policies and the compensation provided to our officers. The Compensation Committee also reviews and determines bonuses for our officers and other employees. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews and administers equity-based compensation for our officers and employees and administers our stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing human capital and compensation risks, including evaluating and assessing risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees and ensuring executive compensation is aligned with performance. The Compensation Committee also is charged with monitoring our incentive and equity-based compensation plans, including employee pension and benefit plans.


*Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee*

Number of Members:		3

Members:		Fred Breidenbach
		Gregory Quesnel
		Duane Zitzner, Chairman

Number of Meetings in fiscal year ended November 30, 2010:		9

Functions:		The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding candidates for directorships and the size, director qualifications, and composition of the Board of Directors, director compensation, including equity compensation, and for overseeing our corporate governance guidelines and reporting and making recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning corporate governance matters. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for considering nominations by stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks related to our overall corporate governance, including board and committee composition, board size and structure, director independence, and our corporate governance profile and ratings. The Committee also is actively engaged in overseeing risks associated with succession planning for the board and management.

*Executive Committee*

Number of Members:		5

Members:		Matthew Miau
		Kevin Murai, Chairman
		Gregory Quesnel
		Dwight Steffensen
		Duane Zitzner

Number of Meetings in fiscal year ended November 30, 2010:		3

Functions:		The Executive Committee is responsible for evaluating strategic opportunities presented by management; performing the functions of the Board of Directors when there is a critical need for prompt review and action of the Board of Directors and it is not practical to arrange a meeting of the Board of Directors within the time reasonably available; and representing the full Board of Directors between regularly scheduled meetings and other matters that the Board of Directors may delegate to the Executive Committee from time to time.


Name	Age		Position
Dwight Steffensen		67	Chairman of the Board
Kevin Murai		47	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Fred Breidenbach		64	Director
Matthew Miau		64	Chairman Emeritus
Gregory Quesnel		62	Director
James Van Horne		75	Director
Duane Zitzner		63	Director
Andrea Zulberti		59	Director


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)(2)		Option Awards ($)(1)(2)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation($)		All Other Compensation ($)(3)		Total ($)
Fred Breidenbach		84,351		75,445		11,039		—		—		170,835
Robert Huang (4)		—		247,950		899,495		—		216,923		1,364,368
Matthew Miau		—		75,445		11,039		53,000		—		139,484
Gregory Quesnel		91,000		75,445		28,605		—		—		195,050
Dwight Steffensen		153,717		75,445		11,039		—		—		240,201
James Van Horne		78,875		75,445		28,327		—		—		182,647
Duane Zitzner		87,701		78,803		11,107		—		—		177,611
Andrea Zulberti		11,192		13,935		6,252		—		—		31,379


Name	Stock Awards			Option Awards
Fred Breidenbach		8,000			40,000
Robert Huang		254,000	(*)		406,958
Matthew Miau		8,000			397,500
Gregory Quesnel		8,000			25,000
Dwight Steffensen		8,000			45,000
James Van Horne		8,000			16,000
Duane Zitzner		8,000			10,000
Andrea Zulberti		2,000			10,000


MiTAC Affiliate	Shares
MiTAC International(1)		6,177,796
Synnex Technology International Corp.(2)		4,426,895
Total		10,604,691


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership						Percentage Beneficially Owned(1)(2)
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Shares Beneficially Owned(1)		Right To Acquire Beneficial Ownership within 60 days of February 9, 2011		Total		Percentage Beneficially Owned(1)(2)
5% Stockholders:
MiTAC International Corporation and related parties(3)		10,604,691		—		10,604,691		29.2	%
FMR LLC(4) 82 Devonshire Street Boston, MA 02109		5,415,568		—		5,415,568		14.9	%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(5) 1299 Ocean Ave Santa Monica, CA 90401		2,302,631		—		2,302,631		6.3	%
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
Kevin Murai		80,000		132,000		212,000		*
Peter Larocque		37,228		40,741		77,969		*
Dennis Polk		38,889		96,957		135,846		*
Thomas Alsborg		25,633		55,519		81,152		*
Simon Leung		15,424		17,875		33,299		*
Fred Breidenbach		8,000		40,000		48,000		*
Matthew Miau(3)		348,774		397,500		746,274		2.1	%
Gregory Quesnel		9,000		25,000		34,000		*
Dwight Steffensen		8,000		45,000		53,000		*
James Van Horne		9,833		16,000		25,833		*
Duane Zitzner		8,000		10,000		18,000		*
Andrea Zulberti		2,000		—		2,000		*
All current directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)		590,781		876,592		1,467,373		4.0	%


Name	Minimum Threshold Percentage of Base Salary
Kevin Murai		130	%
Peter Larocque		138	%
Dennis Polk		115	%
Thomas Alsborg		77	%
Simon Leung		38	%


Name		Total Cash Compensation Target Percentile
Kevin Murai		Below 25^th Percentile
Peter Larocque		Above 50^th Percentile
Dennis Polk		Above 75^th Percentile
Thomas Alsborg		Below 50^th Percentile
Simon Leung		Below 25^th Percentile


Name	Profit Sharing Plan Bonuses
Kevin Murai	$	1,647,000
Peter Larocque	$	1,168,000
Dennis Polk	$	940,000
Thomas Alsborg	$	550,000
Simon Leung	$	215,000


Electronics Distribution Peers	Broad Industry Distribution Peers	Hi-Tech Industry Market Cap Peers
Arrow Electronics, Inc.	Applied Industrial Technologies	Amkor Technology, Inc.
Avnet, Inc.	Owens & Minor	Anixter International Inc.
Ingram Micro, Inc.	PSS World Medical	Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
Insight Enterprises	United Natural Foods	Brightpoint
ScanSource, Inc.	United Stationers	Celestica, Inc.
Tech Data Corporation	.	Fairchild Semiconductor
		Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
		MKS Instruments
		Multi-Fineline Electronix
		Plantronics, Inc.
		Plexus Corp.
		Sanmina SCI
		TriQuint Semiconductor Inc.
		WESCO International, Inc.


Name & Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		Option Awards ($)(1)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Kevin Murai		2010		500,000		345,380		504,032		1,647,000		—		2,996,412
President, Chief Executive		2009		498,076		274,280		344,094		1,100,000		—		2,216,450
Officer, and Director		2008		261,539		64,700		79,192		900,000		8,000		1,313,431

Peter Larocque		2010		328,743		361,938		210,396		1,168,000		850		2,069,927
President, US Distribution		2009		322,938		136,977		243,877		870,000		850		1,574,642
		2008		322,938		102,772		216,517		800,000		850		1,443,077

Dennis Polk		2010		316,468		361,938		210,396		940,000		850		1,829,652
Chief Operating Officer		2009		307,560		136,977		218,448		700,000		850		1,363,835
		2008		307,560		102,772		186,552		625,000		850		1,222,734

Thomas Alsborg		2010		255,770		122,105		155,274		550,000		850		1,083,999
Chief Financial Officer		2009		250,000		97,331		122,946		375,000		850		846,127
		2008		250,000		81,705		103,446		345,000		850		781,001

Simon Leung		2010		219,615		69,344		5,827		215,000		850		510,636
Senior Vice President,		2009		215,000		50,923		24,728		160,000		850		451,501
General Counsel and		2008		193,403		34,887		27,903		125,000		850		382,043
Corporate Secretary


Name	Grant Date		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)(2)						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(3)			All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(4)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($/Sh)
Name	Grant Date		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)							Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($/Sh)
Kevin Murai		4/1/10		—		—		—		—			60,000		29.20		12.81
		4/1/10		—		—		—		15,000			—		—		29.20
		—		650,000		1,300,000		1,885,000		—			—		—		—

Peter Larocque		4/29/10		—		—		—		50,000	(5)		—		—		29.04
		10/7/10		—		—		—		—			19,623		27.87		11.25
		10/7/10		—		—		—		7,175			—		—		27.87
		—		461,000		922,000		1,336,900		—			—		—		—

Dennis Polk		4/29/10		—		—		—		50,000	(5)		—		—		29.04
		10/7/10		—		—		—		—			19,623		27.87		11.25
		10/7/10		—		—		—		7,175			—		—		27.87
		—		371,000		742,000		1,075,900		—			—		—		—

Thomas Alsborg		10/7/10		—		—		—		—			13,345		27.87		11.25
		10/7/10		—		—		—		4,449			—		—		27.87
		—		199,000		398,000		577,100		—			—		—		—

Simon Leung		10/7/10		—		—		—		3,591			—		—		27.87
		—		85,000		170,000		246,500		—			—		—		—


Name	Benefit	Termination for Good Reason/Without Cause; No Change of Control ($)		Termination Without Cause with Change of Control ($)
Kevin Murai	Salary		500,000		500,000
	Bonus		1,300,000		1,300,000
	Option acceleration		—		—
	Benefits continuation		5,326		5,326
	Total value		1,805,326		1,805,326

Peter Larocque	Salary		—		2,854,077
	Bonus		—		—
	Option acceleration		—		—
	Benefits continuation		—		31,038
	Total value		—		2,885,115

Dennis Polk	Salary		—		1,778,530
	Bonus		—		—
	Option acceleration		—		—
	Benefits continuation		—		30,947
	Total value		—		1,809,477

Thomas Alsborg	Salary		—		563,182
	Bonus		—		—
	Option acceleration		—		—
	Benefits continuation		—		15,473
	Total value		—		578,655

Simon Leung	Salary		—		400,867
	Bonus		—		—
	Option acceleration		—		—
	Benefits continuation		—		15,473
	Total value		—		416,340


Name	Option Awards								Stock Awards(1)
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested ($)
Kevin Murai		77,500		72,500		19.41		10/3/2018		—			—
		19,000		41,000		30.96		9/29/2019		—			—
		13,000		47,000		29.20		4/1/2020		—			—
		—		—		—		—		30,000			859,800
		—		—		—		—		12,000			343,920
		—		—		—		—		15,000			429,900

Peter Larocque		20,417		4,583		23.13		10/18/2016		—			—
		14,750		9,583		20.40		10/2/2017		—			—
		834		14,583		19.41		10/3/2018		—			—
		4,083		13,417		30.96		9/29/2019		—			—
		—		19,623		27.87		10/7/2020		—			—
		—		—		—		—		1,666			47,748
		—		—		—		—		3,332			95,495
		—		—		—		—		5,100			146,166
		—		—		—		—		5,200			149,032
		—		—		—		—		50,000	(2)		1,433,000
		—		—		—		—		7,175			205,636

Dennis Polk		21,699		—		16.10		9/27/2014		—			—
		20,000		—		17.17		9/20/2015		—			—
		20,417		4,583		23.13		10/18/2016		—			—
		15,417		9,583		20.40		10/2/2017		—			—
		10,417		14,583		19.41		10/3/2018		—			—
		4,083		13,417		30.96		9/29/2019		—			—
		—		19,623		27.87		10/7/2020		—			—
		—		—		—		—		1,666			47,748
		—		—		—		—		3,332			95,495
		—		—		—		—		5,100			146,166
		—		—		—		—		5,200			149,032
		—		—		—		—		50,000	(2)		1,433,000
		—		—		—		—		7,175			205,636

Thomas Alsborg		36,667		13,333		21.24		3/30/2017		—			—
		4,250		3,250		21.52		1/18/2018		—			—
		3,750		5,250		19.41		10/3/2018		—			—
		2,800		9,200		30.96		9/29/2019		—			—
		—		13,345		27.87		10/7/2020		—			—
		—		—		—		—		6,666			191,048
		—		—		—		—		1,500			42,990
		—		—		—		—		1,800			51,588
		—		—		—		—		3,200			91,712
		—		—		—		—		4,449			127,508

Simon Leung		392		—		10.00		2/15/2012		—			—
		7,291		—		12.00		8/19/2013		—			—
		12,875		—		16.10		9/27/2014		—			—
		5,000		—		17.17		9/20/2015		—			—
		—		—		—		—		600			17,196
		—		—		—		—		1,200			34,392
		—		—		—		—		2,400			68,784
		—		—		—		—		2,400			68,784
		—		—		—		—		3,591			102,918


Name and Position	Dollar Value ($)
Kevin Murai		1,521,000
President and Chief Executive Officer
Peter Larocque		1,043,250
President, US Distribution
Dennis Polk		869,917
Chief Operating Officer
Thomas Alsborg		477,750
Chief Financial Officer
Simon Leung		226,417
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Executive Group		4,138,333
Non-Executive Director Group		—


Services Provided	2010		2009
Audit	$	2,518,519	$	1,842,412
Audit Related		159,337		—
Tax		45,375		43,903
All Other		1,500		1,500
Total	$	2,724,731	$	1,887,815