0000950131-01-503846.txt : 20011029
0000950131-01-503846.hdr.sgml : 20011029
ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950131-01-503846
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: S-4
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 18
FILED AS OF DATE: 20011024
FILER:
COMPANY DATA:
COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CBOT HOLDINGS INC
CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001161448
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: []
STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE
FISCAL YEAR END: 1231
FILING VALUES:
FORM TYPE: S-4
SEC ACT: 1933 Act
SEC FILE NUMBER: 333-72184
FILM NUMBER: 1765635
BUSINESS ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 141 WEST JACKSON BLVD
CITY: CHICAGO
STATE: IL
ZIP: 60604
MAIL ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 141 WEST JACKSON ST
CITY: CHICAGO
STATE: IL
ZIP: 60604
S-4
1
ds4.txt
FORM S-4
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 24, 2001
Registration No. 333-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------------
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
The Securities Act of 1933
---------------
CBOT Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 6231 36-4468986
(State or other (Primary Standard (I.R.S. Employer
jurisdiction of Industrial Classification Identification Number)
incorporation or Code Number)
organization)
141 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604
(312) 435-3500
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
registrant's principal executive offices)
---------------
Carol A. Burke
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
CBOT Holdings, Inc. and
Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
141 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604
(312) 435-3500
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of agent for service)
Copies to:
John H. Stassen, P.C.
Joseph P. Gromacki
Kirkland & Ellis
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 861-2000
---------------
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public: As promptly as
practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective and the
satisfaction or waiver of certain other conditions described herein.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box. [_]
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. [_]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [_]
---------------
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum
Title of each class of Maximum aggregate Amount of
securities to be Amount to be offering price offering price registration
registered registered per share (1) (1) fee(2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock, $0.001 par
value.................. 39,802,650
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................... $588,849,700 $147,212.43
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee under
Rule 457(f)(l). The securities to be registered are to be offered in
connection with the restructuring transactions, a series of transactions
in which such securities will be distributed to the members in respect of
their existing memberships in the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago,
Inc., a Delaware nonstock, not-for-profit corporation. Such memberships
have an aggregate market value equal to $588,849,700, determined as
provided by Rule 457(c) based upon the average of the bid and asked prices
of each class of membership as of October 19, 2001.
(2) Pursuant to Rule 457(p), the registration fee of $147,212.43 is being
offset by the filing fee of $140,650.33 previously paid by the Board of
Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. (the "CBOT"), the parent of the
Registrant, in connection with the filing of the CBOT's Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-54370), initially filed on January 26, 2001
and subsequently withdrawn on Form RW on October 24, 2001.
---------------
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or
dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant
shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration
statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become
effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a),
may determine.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+The information contained in this document may change. We may not complete +
+the transactions described in this document, and issue the securities +
+described in this document, until the registration statement is filed with +
+the Securities and Exchange Commission and is declared effective. This +
+document is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an +
+offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not +
+permitted. +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
PROXY STATEMENT AND PROSPECTUS (SUBJECT TO CHANGE) DATED OCTOBER 24, 2001
[Logo of Chicago Board of Trade]
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
141 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
, 2001
Dear Voting Member:
It is my privilege to present to you this proxy statement and prospectus in
connection with a historic membership vote on a proposed restructuring of the
Chicago Board of Trade, which is intended to enhance its competitiveness within
the futures industry. You are being asked to vote on the restructuring
transactions described in this document. The restructuring transactions are
designed to:
. demutualize our organization by creating a stock, for-profit holding
company and distributing shares of common stock of the holding company to
our members, while maintaining the CBOT as a nonstock subsidiary of the
holding company;
. modernize our corporate governance structure; and
. reorganize and consolidate our electronic trading business.
Pursuant to the restructuring transactions, we will create a new stock, for-
profit holding company and reorganize the CBOT, which is currently a nonstock,
not-for-profit corporation, into a for-profit, nonstock corporation that will
be a subsidiary of the holding company. Each member will receive shares of
common stock in the holding company in accordance with an allocation
methodology described in this document and one of the five series of Class B
membership in the CBOT subsidiary in respect of each membership held by such
member. The shares of common stock in the holding company will represent an
equity interest in the holding company. Each series of Class B membership will,
subject to satisfaction of applicable membership and eligibility requirements,
entitle the holder to trading rights and privileges that correspond to the
trading rights and privileges currently associated with that holder's class of
membership in the CBOT. In addition, each Full Member will receive a Class C
membership in the CBOT subsidiary, which will, subject to satisfaction of
certain requirements, entitle the holder to become a member of the Chicago
Board Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership on such
exchange. Following the completion of the restructuring transactions, the Class
C membership will evidence the Chicago Board Options Exchange "exercise right"
currently held by each Full Member.
In connection with the restructuring transactions, we will substantially
eliminate the membership petition process and adopt a more modern mechanism for
initiating and voting on stockholder proposals. We will also modernize other
aspects of our corporate governance structure in order to improve our corporate
decision-making process.
In addition, our electronic trading business will be reorganized and
consolidated into our wholly owned subsidiary, Electronic Chicago Board of
Trade, Inc. As a result, members who are limited partners of Ceres Trading
Limited Partnership will receive a cash payment in exchange for their limited
partnership interests and Ceres will be liquidated.
Our Full Members and Associate Members will be entitled to vote on the
restructuring transactions. Full Members will be entitled to one vote for each
Full Membership owned and Associate Members will be entitled to one-sixth of
one vote for each Associate Membership owned. No other class of membership will
be entitled to vote on the restructuring transactions.
Please review carefully the attached document, which provides important
information regarding the restructuring transactions. In particular, you should
carefully consider the matters discussed under "Risk Factors" beginning on page
18.
Our board of directors has approved the restructuring transactions and
recommends that you vote "FOR" each of the three propositions relating to the
restructuring transactions. We believe that the restructuring transactions will
better position us to compete in the rapidly changing and consolidating futures
industry and will give our organization greater structural flexibility and
easier access to equity capital, if needed, to grow and continue to offer
quality products and services.
Sincerely,
/s/ Nickolas J. Neubauer
Nickolas J. Neubauer
Chairman of the Board
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
regulator has approved or disapproved these securities, or determined if this
proxy statement and prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offense.
This document is dated , 2001 and was first mailed, with the form
of proxy, to members on or about , 2001.
[Logo of Chicago Board of Trade}
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
141 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
To Our Voting Members:
The board of directors of the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
has called a special meeting of the membership, to be held at 2:30 p.m.,
Central time, on , 2001 in the Visitor Center Theater, Fifth Floor,
at our offices at 141 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. The
purpose of the meeting is to vote on three propositions relating to the
restructuring transactions described in this document: (1) the approval and
adoption of the agreement and plan of merger relating to the merger of the CBOT
with a newly formed, nonstock, for-profit corporation, which will facilitate
the demutualization of the CBOT; (2) ratification of the August 7, 2001
agreement relating to the exercise right entered into by the CBOT and the
Chicago Board Options Exchange; and (3) the approval of all other matters
relating to the restructuring transactions, including a new certificate of
incorporation and bylaws for the holding company and the CBOT subsidiary, and
certain changes to the rules and regulations, which, collectively, are designed
to modernize certain aspects of our corporate governance structure, and the
reorganization of our electronic trading business. Unless all three of these
propositions are approved, the restructuring transactions will not have been
approved by the members and, accordingly, will not be completed.
Holders of Full Memberships and Associate Memberships will be entitled to
vote on these matters at the special meeting of the membership. Full Members
will be entitled to one vote for each Full Membership owned and Associate
Members will be entitled to one-sixth of one vote for each Associate Membership
owned. No other class of membership will be entitled to vote on the
restructuring transactions.
We have enclosed a proxy ballot for your use in voting on the propositions
described above and in this document. The special meeting of the membership and
related proxy ballot solicitation will be conducted in accordance with our
certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations and applicable
law. In particular, the propositions described in this document are being
submitted to a vote of the membership pursuant to Sections 5 and 7 of Exhibit A
to our certificate of incorporation.
In connection with the proxy ballot solicitation, please note the following
instructions:
. Please mark the enclosed proxy ballot with respect to each proposition
and provide your signature, printed name and date where indicated, and
enclose and seal the completed proxy ballot in the gold envelope
addressed to the Secretary of the CBOT. Each proxy ballot must be signed
in order to be effective.
. Print your name in the upper left-hand corner of the gold envelope and
deliver or mail it to the Secretary's Office. Alternatively, you may
submit your completed proxy ballot to the Secretary's Office by
depositing the proxy ballot in the ballot box located in the fourth floor
lobby of our offices between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 2:15 p.m.,
Central time, on , 2001.
In the absence of specific direction, proxies will be voted "FOR" approval
of the propositions. Proxies that are marked both "FOR" and "AGAINST" a given
proposition will not count and will not be treated as votes cast with respect
to such proposition. Proxy ballots must be received at the Board of Trade of
the City of Chicago, Inc., Office of the Secretary, 141 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604 prior to 2:15 p.m., Central time, on , 2001
in order to be counted.
Returning your completed proxy ballot will not prevent you from voting in
person at the special meeting of the membership if you are present and wish to
vote. Please note, however, that if you vote by proxy ballot you will not need
to attend the special meeting of the membership, or take any further action in
connection with the special meeting, because you already will have directed the
proxy how you wish to vote with respect to the propositions. You may revoke
your proxy ballot any time before the special meeting of the membership by
providing written notice to the Secretary or by submission of a later-dated
proxy ballot.
Your board of directors has carefully considered and approved these matters
and recommends that you vote "FOR" approval of each of the three propositions
relating to the restructuring transactions being submitted for your approval.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Paul J. Draths
Paul J. Draths
Vice President and Secretary
, 2001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
----
Summary................................................................... 1
Risk Factors.............................................................. 18
The Restructuring Transactions............................................ 34
Capitalization............................................................ 73
Selected Consolidated Financial Data...................................... 74
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations............................................................... 76
Our Business ............................................................. 87
Management and Executive Compensation..................................... 111
Description of Capital Stock.............................................. 124
Comparison of the Rights of Members of the CBOT Prior to and After
Completion of the Restructuring Transactions ............................ 130
Shares Eligible for Future Sale........................................... 140
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Restructuring
Transactions ............................................................ 141
Special Meeting and Proxy Information..................................... 143
Legal Matters............................................................. 145
Experts................................................................... 145
Where You Can Find More Information....................................... 145
Appendix A
Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. and Subsidiaries Financial
Statements.............................................................. A-1
Appendix B
Pro Forma Financial Information of Board of Trade of the City of
Chicago, Inc. and Subsidiaries.......................................... B-1
Appendix C
Agreement and Plan of Merger............................................ C-1
Page
-----
Appendix D
Appendix D-1: William Blair Fairness Opinion........................... D-1-1
Appendix D-2: Arthur Andersen Fairness Opinion......................... D-2-1
Appendix D-3: Preliminary Ceres Valuation Analysis..................... D-3-1
Appendix E
Appendix E-1: Settlement Agreement between the CBOT and Chicago Board
Options Exchange ...................................................... E-1-1
Appendix E-2: Letter Agreement between the CBOT, CBOT Holdings and
Chicago Board Options
Exchange .............................................................. E-2-1
Appendix F
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of CBOT
Holdings, Inc. ........................................................ F-1
Appendix G
Amended and Restated Bylaws of CBOT Holdings, Inc...................... G-1
Appendix H
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Board of Trade
of the City of Chicago, Inc............................................ H-1
Appendix I
Amended and Restated Bylaws of
the Board of Trade of the City of
Chicago, Inc........................................................... I-1
Appendix J
Status of Certain Current CBOT Rules and Regulations as a Result of the
Restructuring Transactions............................................. J-1
References to "we," "us" or "our" refer to either the CBOT, in its current
form as a nonstock, not-for-profit corporation, or CBOT Holdings, the stock,
for-profit holding company that will result from completion of the
restructuring transactions described in this document, as the context requires,
together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
Project A(R) is a registered trademark of Ceres. Certain other trademarks
used herein are the property of their respective owners.
CBOT Holdings is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of the CBOT. On January
26, 2001, the CBOT filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 353-54370), including a
proxy statement and prospectus, relating to the restructuring transactions
described in this document, which was subsequently amended on March 6, 2001,
March 26, 2001, April 6, 2001 and May 2, 2001. In addition, the CBOT and its
predecessor, have filed various communications relating to the restructuring
transactions described in this document with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
As a result of certain refinements to the restructuring transactions described
in this document the CBOT has withdrawn its Registration Statement on Form S-4
as of October 24, 2001 and caused CBOT Holdings to file a Registration
Statement on Form S-4, of which this document forms a part, relating to the
restructuring transactions, as refined and described in this document. All
communications relating to the restructuring transactions described in this
document and previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
the CBOT and its predecessor pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, shall be deemed to refer to the restructuring transactions
described in this document.
You should rely only on the information contained in this document or to
which we have referred you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information that is different. This document may be used only where it is legal
to issue these securities. The information contained in this document is
accurate only as of the date of this document, regardless of the date of
delivery of this document or of the sale of any securities.
i
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this document. It
does not contain all of the information which you should consider before voting
on the restructuring transactions and may not contain all of the information
that is important to your individual situation. Consequently, you should read
this entire document very carefully before voting on the restructuring
transactions.
Overview of the Restructuring Transactions
As a result of rapidly evolving changes in the futures industry, principally
the increasing importance of electronic trading, we have determined that it is
necessary to restructure our organization in order to enhance its
competitiveness. Over the last several years, with the assistance of various
outside advisors, we have conducted an ongoing and extensive evaluation process
with respect to our need to restructure. As a result of this process, we have
developed, and are proposing for your approval, a series of transactions
designed to restructure the CBOT.
These transactions, which we sometimes refer to in this document as the
"restructuring transactions," are designed to:
. demutualize our organization by creating a stock, for-profit holding
company, which we sometimes refer to in this document as "CBOT Holdings,"
and distributing shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings to our members,
while maintaining the CBOT as a nonstock subsidiary of CBOT Holdings;
. modernize our corporate governance structure by substantially eliminating
the membership petition process, adopting a more modern mechanism for
initiating and voting on stockholder proposals and making other changes
to improve our corporate decision-making process; and
. reorganize and consolidate our electronic trading business, part of which
is currently operated by Ceres Trading Limited Partnership, or "Ceres,"
into Electronic Chicago Board of Trade, Inc., or "eCBOT," our wholly
owned corporate subsidiary formed for that purpose.
We believe that the completion of the restructuring transactions will enable us
to enhance our competitiveness within the futures industry, including our
competitiveness within both the open outcry and electronic trading markets.
We currently anticipate that we will complete the restructuring transactions
as soon as reasonably practicable following membership approval, subject to
receiving a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service and/or opinion
of counsel, and any required regulatory approvals from the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission. However, our obligation to complete the restructuring
transactions is subject to satisfaction of a number of conditions, including,
among other things, a condition that our board of directors shall not have
determined that the restructuring transactions are no longer in the best
interests of the CBOT and its members or that the restructuring transactions
are not fair to each class of CBOT membership. For more information about the
IRS ruling and opinion of counsel, CFTC approvals and other conditions to our
obligation to complete the restructuring transactions, see "The Restructuring
Transactions--Regulatory Matters" and "--Conditions to Completing the
Restructuring Transactions."
Our Business
Founded in 1848, we are one of the world's leading exchanges for the trading
of futures and options on futures contracts, with total volume traded in the
first half of 2001 of about 127 million contracts, which represented about 9%
of the total volume of global listed futures, options on futures and equity
index contracts traded. From our origins in the nineteenth century as a market
for trading grains, we have evolved into a major financial center in the
twenty-first century, offering a diverse range of products based on interest
rates, debt instruments, agricultural commodities, equity indices and other
underlying instruments.
1
We operate markets for the trading of commodity and financial futures
contracts, as well as options on futures contracts. Our products trade on
traditional open outcry auction markets on our trading floors in Chicago where
members trade among themselves for their own accounts and for the accounts of
their customers. We also make our products available for trading on the a/c/e
electronic trading system operated by our joint venture with the Eurex Group,
which includes Deutsche Borse AG, the Swiss Stock Exchange and Eurex Zurich AG.
The a/c/e system uses a modified form of the technology used at Eurex, the
largest derivatives exchange in the world.
We also engage in market surveillance and financial supervision activities
designed to ensure market integrity and provide financial safeguards for users
of our markets. Further, we market and distribute real-time and historical
market data generated from trading activity in our markets to users of our
products and related cash and derivative markets.
Our principal executive offices are located at 141 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, and our telephone number is (312) 435-3500. For more
information about our business, see "Our Business."
Common Stock
In connection with the restructuring transactions, each member of the CBOT,
including each Full Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM, as well as
each member holding a one-half Associate Membership, will receive an
appropriate number of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings. The number of
shares of common stock to be received by each member will be based upon the
allocation methodology developed and recommended by our board's Independent
Allocation Committee and approved by our board of directors. For purposes of
the restructuring transactions, including the allocation of common stock of
CBOT Holdings, each member holding a one-half Associate Membership will be
treated as a GIM.
The common stock of CBOT Holdings will generally have traditional features
of common stock, including dividend, voting and liquidation rights. In
particular, the common stock of CBOT Holdings will provide the holder with the
right to receive dividends as determined by the board of directors and the
right to share in the proceeds of liquidation, in each case ratably on the
basis of the number of shares held and subject to the rights of any preferred
stock that could be issued in the future. In addition, holders of common stock
of CBOT Holdings will have the right to vote on all matters upon which
stockholders of CBOT Holdings will be entitled to vote generally, including,
among other things, the election of directors to the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings.
For more information about the common stock of CBOT Holdings, see
"Description of Capital Stock."
The Restructuring Transactions
The restructuring transactions consist of a series of transactions designed
to demutualize our organization by creating a stock, for-profit holding
company, CBOT Holdings, and distributing shares of common stock of CBOT
Holdings to our members, while maintaining the CBOT as a nonstock subsidiary of
CBOT Holdings, modernize our corporate governance structure and consolidate our
electronic trading business into our wholly owned subsidiary, eCBOT. Let us
tell you more about the restructuring transactions:
Demutualization
The demutualization of the CBOT will be accomplished, in part, by merging
the CBOT with a newly formed nonstock, for-profit subsidiary, which will result
in the CBOT being the surviving entity. We sometimes refer to this merger as
the "reorganization merger." Upon completion of the reorganization merger, the
CBOT will become a nonstock, for-profit corporation and a subsidiary of CBOT
Holdings. For more information on the reorganization merger, including a chart
depicting the organization structure following the completion of the
reorganization merger, see "The Restructuring Transactions--Description of the
Restructuring Transactions."
2
In connection with the completion of the reorganization merger, members will
receive a dividend of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings, payable upon
effectiveness of the reorganization merger in accordance with an allocation
methodology described in this document, as set forth in the table below.
Shares of Common Stock of CBOT Holdings
to Be Received Per CBOT Membership
Shares of
Membership Common Stock
---------- ------------
Full 25,000
Associate 5,000
GIM 2,500
IDEM 300
COM 350
Immediately after the completion of the restructuring transactions, our
members will be the only common stockholders of CBOT Holdings.
In addition, upon completion of the reorganization merger, the CBOT
subsidiary will create three new classes of membership: Class A memberships,
Class B memberships and Class C memberships. CBOT Holdings will hold the sole
Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary, which will entitle CBOT Holdings to
the exclusive right to vote on most matters requiring a vote of the members of
the CBOT subsidiary, as well as the exclusive right to receive all
distributions, dividends and proceeds upon liquidation from the CBOT
subsidiary. The Class B memberships will consist of five separate series:
Series B-1, Series B-2, Series B-3, Series B-4 and Series B-5, with each series
having associated with it trading rights and privileges that correspond to one
of the current five classes of CBOT membership. As set forth in the table
below, members of the CBOT will receive one of the five series of Class B
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary in respect of each membership held by such
member. In addition, each Full Member will also receive a Class C membership in
the CBOT subsidiary, which will, subject to satisfaction of certain
requirements, entitle the holder to become a member of the Chicago Board
Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership on such exchange.
Following completion of the restructuring transactions, the Class C membership
of the CBOT subsidiary will represent the right to become members of the
Chicago Board Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership on such
exchange. This right is set forth in the certificate of incorporation of the
Chicago Board Options Exchange and is currently held by each Full Member of the
CBOT. We sometimes refer to this right in this document as the "exercise
right."
Memberships in the CBOT Subsidiary
to be Received Per CBOT Membership
Number of
Number and Series of CBOT Subsidiary
Class of CBOT CBOT Subsidiary Class C
Membership Class B Memberships Memberships
------------- -------------------- ---------------
Full 1 Series B-1 1 Class C
Associate 1 Series B-2 --
GIM 1 Series B-3 --
IDEM 1 Series B-4 --
COM 1 Series B-5 --
You are being asked to adopt and approve, among other things, the agreement
and plan of merger pursuant to which the reorganization merger will occur. We
have included as Appendix C to this document the form of the agreement and plan
of merger. We urge you to review carefully the agreement and plan of merger
before voting on the restructuring transactions.
3
For more information about our demutualization, including the allocation of
shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings among members, see "The Restructuring
Transactions--Description of the Restructuring Transactions--Demutualization,"
"--Independent Allocation Committee of the Board" and "--Opinion of the
Financial Advisor to the Independent Allocation Committee of the Board."
Modernizing Our Corporate Governance Structure
In connection with the restructuring transactions, we will modernize certain
aspects of our corporate governance structure. These changes will occur as a
result of the creation of a holding company structure and certain changes to be
made to the certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations of
the CBOT in connection with the reorganization merger.
CBOT Holdings will have a corporate governance structure more customary for
a for-profit stock corporation. The holders of the common stock of CBOT
Holdings will have the right to vote on all matters upon which the stockholders
of CBOT Holdings will be entitled to vote generally, including, among other
things, the election of directors to the board of directors of CBOT Holdings.
However, the holders of the common stock of CBOT Holdings will not be entitled
to initiate proposals to amend the certificate of incorporation of CBOT
Holdings or, as described below, the certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary. Although stockholders of CBOT
Holdings will be able to initiate proposals to amend the bylaws of CBOT
Holdings, such proposals may only be brought to a vote at an annual meeting
after satisfying certain advance notice requirements and will require the
approval of two-thirds of the voting power of the stockholders of CBOT Holdings
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors.
The CBOT subsidiary will have a somewhat unique corporate governance
structure, which is designed generally to vest control with CBOT Holdings, but
provide the holders of Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships with
special voting rights with respect to the trading rights and privileges
associated with Class B memberships. In particular, CBOT Holdings, as the
holder of the sole Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary, will have the
exclusive right to vote on most matters requiring a vote of the members of the
CBOT subsidiary including, among other things, the election of directors to the
board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary. The holders of Class B and Class C
memberships will not have voting rights with respect to matters requiring a
vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, except that holders of Series B-1
and Series B-2, Class B memberships will have limited voting rights to approve
changes that would adversely affect certain core rights relating to the trading
rights and privileges of Class B memberships.
Specifically, the holders of Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships
in the CBOT subsidiary will have the right to vote on any amendment to the
certificate of incorporation, bylaws or rules and regulations of the CBOT
subsidiary that would adversely affect the following core rights:
. the allocation of products that a holder of a specific series of Class B
membership is permitted to trade on the exchange facilities of the CBOT
subsidiary, e.g., the elimination of any product from a holder's trading
rights and privileges;
. the requirement that Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary will be
charged transaction fees for trades of the CBOT subsidiary's products for
their accounts that are lower than the transaction fees charged to any
participant who is not a Class B member for the same products;
. the authorized number of memberships of any class or series of
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary;
. the membership and eligibility requirements to become a Class B member of
the CBOT subsidiary or to exercise the associated trading rights or
privileges; and
. the commitment to maintain current open outcry markets so long as each
such market is deemed liquid unless the discontinuance of any such market
is approved by the holders of the Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary.
Holders of Series B-1, Class B memberships in the CBOT subsidiary will have one
vote per membership and holders of Series B-2, Class B memberships in the CBOT
subsidiary will have one-sixth of one vote per
4
membership in any vote with respect to a proposed amendment to the certificate
of incorporation, bylaws or rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary that
would adversely affect any of the above-described core rights. The holders of
Series B-3, Series B-4 and Series B-5, Class B memberships and Class C
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary will not have the right to vote on such
matters.
The certificate of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary will limit the ability of stockholders and members, respectively, to
participate in the day-to-day management and operations of CBOT Holdings and
the CBOT subsidiary. For example, the boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and
the CBOT subsidiary will generally have the authority to adopt, repeal and
amend the bylaws of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary, respectively,
without approval by the holders of its common stock or members, as the case may
be. In addition, the so-called "petition process" of the members of the CBOT,
which includes, among other things, the ability of voting members to petition
the board of directors to call special meetings of members and the requirement
that members approve all changes to the certificate of incorporation and
bylaws, will be substantially eliminated.
On October 16, 2001, our board of directors approved and adopted amendments
to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which, if approved by our
members, would authorize our board of directors to delay the next annual
election, which is currently scheduled for December 2001, until no later than
March 31, 2002, reduce the size of our board of directors from 18 members to
nine members at the first annual election following timely approval of the
restructuring transactions by our members, clarify our board of directors'
discretion as to the timing of its regular meetings and make certain other
conforming changes. A special meeting of the members for the purpose of voting
on such amendments has been scheduled for October 31, 2001. If our members
approve such amendments and separately approve the restructuring transactions
in a timely manner, our board of directors will be reduced in size from 18
directors to nine directors in connection with the next annual election, which
will be held as soon as reasonably practicable following membership approval of
the restructuring transactions, but in no event later than March 31, 2002. At
such annual election, our members will elect eight new directors to serve on
the nine-member board of directors with the then current chairman of the board
continuing to serve in such capacity as the ninth member of such board. Upon
completion of the restructuring transactions, the new directors elected to
serve on the nine-member board of directors will continue to serve on the
boards of directors of both CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary until the
next annual meeting of each such corporation.
If the amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not
approved by our members or the membership vote on the restructuring
transactions does not occur in a timely manner, and, as a result, the size of
our board of directors is not reduced from 18 directors to nine directors prior
to the completion of the restructuring transactions, the certificate of
incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings will provide that the then current
18-member board of directors will continue as the boards of directors of CBOT
Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary immediately following completion of the
restructuring transactions. The size of the board of directors of CBOT Holdings
will thereafter be reduced to nine directors in connection with a special
meeting of stockholders, to be held as soon as reasonably practicable following
completion of the restructuring transactions. At such special meeting, the
stockholders will elect eight new directors to serve on the nine-member board
of directors with the then current chairman of the board continuing to serve in
such capacity as the ninth member of such board. In connection with the
election of directors to the new nine-member board of directors of CBOT
Holdings, it is anticipated that CBOT Holdings, as the sole Class A member of
the CBOT subsidiary, will elect each of the newly-elected directors serving on
the nine-member board of directors of CBOT Holdings as directors of the CBOT
subsidiary. Each director of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary will be
elected to serve as a director until the next annual meeting of each such
corporation and will not be subject to term limits.
In order to ensure that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings is generally
identical in size and composition to the board of directors of the CBOT
subsidiary, it will be a qualification for service as a director
5
of the CBOT subsidiary that such director also serve on the board of directors
of CBOT Holdings. The nine-member boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and the
CBOT subsidiary will each consist of the chairman of the board, five directors
who are Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary, two directors who are
"independent" within the meaning of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws
of CBOT Holdings and one director who is "at-large," or generally not subject
to qualifications. We currently expect that the president and chief executive
officer of CBOT Holdings will be nominated for election as the at-large
director.
We will also make certain changes to the rules and regulations of the CBOT.
After completion of the restructuring transactions, the rules and regulations
will be part of the bylaws of the CBOT subsidiary and, accordingly, the
authority to adopt, repeal and amend the rules and regulations will be vested
solely and exclusively in the board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary and the
holder of the Class A membership, except for amendments which would adversely
affect the core rights of the Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B members, as
described above, which will also require the approval of the holders of Series
B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships. As a result, the holders of common
stock of CBOT Holdings and the holders of memberships in the CBOT subsidiary
will not generally have the authority to adopt, repeal or amend the rules and
regulations.
The substantial elimination of the petition process and the elimination of
the requirement of membership approval to adopt, repeal or amend the bylaws and
rules are designed to modernize our corporate governance structure in order to
improve the efficiency of our decision-making process. Since these changes will
materially affect your rights and obligations, we urge you to give careful
consideration to these aspects of the restructuring transactions before voting
on the restructuring transactions.
For more information about these changes to our corporate governance
structure, see "The Restructuring Transactions--Description of the
Restructuring Transactions--Modernization of Our Corporate Governance
Structure."
Reorganizing Our Electronic Trading Business
In connection with the restructuring transactions, our electronic trading
business will be reorganized and consolidated into our wholly owned eCBOT
subsidiary, so that following the restructuring transactions, eCBOT will
conduct the electronic trading business of the CBOT. This will be accomplished
pursuant to certain transactions described below involving Ceres, which
currently operates part of the electronic trading business of the CBOT.
As part of the reorganization of our electronic trading business, a newly-
formed corporate subsidiary of the CBOT subsidiary will merge with and into
Ceres, with Ceres as the surviving entity. As a result of this merger, which we
sometimes refer to in this document as the "Ceres merger," eCBOT will remain
the general partner of Ceres and the CBOT subsidiary will become a limited
partner of Ceres. Following the Ceres merger, Ceres will liquidate and its
assets will be distributed to the CBOT subsidiary and eCBOT. The CBOT
subsidiary will then transfer to eCBOT assets relating to the electronic
trading business received in such distribution. As a result, eCBOT will own and
operate the electronic trading business of the CBOT subsidiary.
Pursuant to the Ceres merger, the limited partners of Ceres, other than
eCBOT, will receive a cash payment in exchange for their limited partnership
interests. The cash payment that will be distributed in exchange for each
limited partnership interest will be determined by our board and the board of
directors of eCBOT, the general partner of Ceres, after considering each
limited partnership interest's allocable portion of the value of Ceres as
presented in the final valuation report of Arthur Andersen LLP regarding the
value of Ceres and the partnership interests in Ceres, to be delivered as of a
date reasonably proximate to the date of the completion of the Ceres merger.
As described further below, we engaged Arthur Andersen to determine the fair
market value of Ceres and the limited partnership interests and evaluate the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to Ceres and each
6
class of limited partners of the consideration to be issued in the Ceres merger
to each class of the Ceres limited partners.
In October 2001, Arthur Andersen prepared a preliminary valuation analysis
that concluded the fair market value of Ceres as of June 30, 2001 was
$25,400,000. For purposes of illustration, the chart below indicates the amount
of the cash payment that would have been distributed for each Class A limited
partnership interest in Ceres if the distribution had been made on the basis of
Arthur Andersen's valuation analysis of Ceres as of June 30, 2001. The actual
amount of the cash payment that will be distributed to each limited partner of
Ceres will not be determined until shortly before the completion of the Ceres
merger.
Illustrative Example of the Amount of the Cash Payment To Be
Received Per Ceres Class A Limited Partnership Interest
As of June 30, 2001
Limited
Partnership Cash
Interest Payment
----------- ----------
Class A-1 $11,449.35
Class A-2 1,908.26
Class A-3 954.07
Class A-4 57.25
Class B limited partnership interests in Ceres, which are currently held
only by our clearing members, are valued, in part, based upon the CBOT trading
volume of the member holding such limited partnership interest. As a result,
the value of each Class B limited partnership interest and the amount of the
cash payment to be distributed in exchange for that limited partnership
interest varies by holder. Based upon the June 30, 2001 valuation of Ceres, a
total of $5,080,000 would be distributed to the 60 holders of Class B limited
partnership interests in Ceres.
You should understand that the actual amount of the cash payment to be
distributed to each Ceres limited partner will be determined by our board of
directors and the board of directors of eCBOT after considering the value of
each limited partnership interest as presented in Arthur Andersen's final
valuation report to be delivered to us as of a date reasonably proximate to the
date of the completion of the Ceres merger and is not capable of determination
at this time. Accordingly, the description above is for illustrative purposes
only.
For more information about the reorganization of our electronic trading
business, including the Ceres merger, the valuation of Ceres and the
distribution of cash payments to the Ceres limited partners, see "The
Restructuring Transactions--Description of the Restructuring Transactions--
Reorganization of Our Electronic Trading Business," "--Opinion of Arthur
Andersen to the Board of Directors Regarding the Fairness of the Ceres Merger"
and "--Ceres Valuation Analysis of Arthur Andersen."
Fairness Opinions
Our board of directors has received two fairness opinions from our financial
advisors in connection with the restructuring transactions--one opinion
relating to the allocation of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings among the
members in connection with the demutualization and another opinion relating to
the amount of the cash payments to be distributed among the Ceres limited
partners as merger consideration pursuant to the Ceres merger in connection
with the reorganization of our electronic trading business.
Neither of these two fairness opinions addresses the value of the CBOT or
the memberships before or after completion of the restructuring transactions,
or the fairness of the consideration to be received by CBOT
7
members in respect of their memberships in connection with the restructuring
transactions. See "Risk Factors--Risk Factors Relating to the Restructuring
Transactions--We Have Not Determined or Received Any Opinion Regarding the
Value of the CBOT Before or After the Restructuring Transactions or the Value
of the Securities You Will Receive in the Restructuring Transactions Compared
to the Value of the Memberships You Currently Own."
William Blair Fairness Opinion
Since no mechanism currently exists in our certificate of incorporation,
bylaws or rules and regulations for allocating ownership in our organization
among the members in connection with a restructuring such as the restructuring
transactions, our board of directors appointed an Independent Allocation
Committee, composed solely of public or independent directors of the board, to
determine and recommend to the full board an appropriate and fair allocation of
equity among the CBOT members of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings.
William Blair & Company, L.L.C. was retained by the Independent Allocation
Committee and the board of directors to deliver a written opinion as to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the allocation of shares of common
stock of CBOT Holdings among the members in respect of their memberships in
connection with the restructuring transactions. The opinion, dated September
24, 2001, states that, based upon and subject to the matters set forth in the
opinion, the allocation of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings among the
members in respect of their memberships in connection with the restructuring
transactions in the ratio of 5.0 : 1.0 : 0.5 : 0.06 : 0.07 to each Full Member,
Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM, respectively, is fair, from a financial
point of view, to each of the five classes of members. The full text of the
William Blair fairness opinion is attached as Appendix D-1 to this document.
Arthur Andersen Fairness Opinion
Arthur Andersen was retained by our board of directors and the board of
directors of eCBOT to render a written opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Ceres and each class of the limited partners of
Ceres of the consideration to be received by each limited partner of Ceres in
exchange for their respective limited partnership interests pursuant to the
Ceres merger.
The opinion, dated October 2, 2001, states that, based upon and subject to
the matters set forth in the opinion, the consideration to be received by each
limited partner of Ceres in exchange for their respective limited partnership
interests pursuant to the Ceres merger, is fair, from a financial point of
view, to Ceres and each class of the limited partners of Ceres. The full text
of the Arthur Andersen fairness opinion is attached as Appendix D-2 to this
document.
Ceres Valuation
Arthur Andersen was also retained to provide a valuation of Ceres and its
partnership interests. This valuation analysis will provide the basis for
determining the amount of the cash payment to be distributed as merger
consideration among the Ceres limited partners in the Ceres merger.
As described in greater detail elsewhere in this document, Arthur Andersen
has determined the value of Ceres to be $25,400,000 as of June 30, 2001. The
full text of the preliminary Ceres valuation analysis as of such date is
attached as Appendix D-3 to this document.
Arthur Andersen will provide us with its final valuation report, including
its valuation analysis of Ceres and the limited partnership interests as of
such date, on a date reasonably proximate to the date of the completion of the
Ceres merger. This report will be considered by our board and the board of
directors of eCBOT when determining the actual amount of the cash payment to be
distributed to the Ceres limited partners pursuant to the Ceres merger.
8
Agreement Relating to the Exercise Right
Since 1972, when we created the Chicago Board Options Exchange, our Full
Members have had a legal right to become members of that exchange without
having to purchase a membership. Over the last year or more, since we first
announced our desire to pursue a strategic restructuring of the CBOT into a
stock, for-profit company, the Chicago Board Options Exchange has stated
publicly its view that, if consummated, the restructuring transactions would
extinguish the exercise right under certain circumstances. In particular, the
Chicago Board Options Exchange stated in a proposed interpretation and change
to its rules relating to the exercise right that the exercise right would be
terminated:
. for any Full Member, if that Full Member sells or otherwise transfers any
of the stock and other interests received as a result of completing the
restructuring transactions in respect of his or her Full Membership;
. for all Full Members, if the CBOT by expanding electronic trading on the
a/c/e system or otherwise, allows non-members to trade directly on the
CBOT on the same basis as members; or
. for all Full Members, if CBOT members who exercise their right to become
members of the Chicago Board Options Exchange are able to trade at member
rates all of the CBOT's products and the Chicago Board Options Exchange's
products simultaneously.
In connection with the proposed change to the rules of the Chicago Board
Options Exchange, the Chicago Board Options Exchange also took the position
that:
. the a/c/e system gives our members who exercise the right to become
Chicago Board Options Exchange members the ability to trade on the
Chicago Board Options Exchange trading floor and through the CBOT at the
same time, activity that the Chicago Board Options Exchange claimed was
incompatible with the exercise right; and
. the exercise right may be terminated after completion of the
restructuring transactions because certain non-trading rights, including
voting rights, of the current Full Members of the CBOT would change in
connection with the completion of the restructuring transactions.
Because we believed that the Chicago Board Options Exchange's position
violated a 1992 agreement between us and the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
which addresses the exercise right, and because the exercise right is valuable
to our Full Members, we at that time initiated litigation in the Illinois
Circuit Court against the Chicago Board Options Exchange intended to protect
the exercise right.
On August 7, 2001, the CBOT entered into an agreement with the Chicago Board
Options Exchange for the stated purpose of resolving the dispute between the
parties regarding the exercise right within the context of the restructuring
transactions and electronic trading generally at the CBOT. Subject to
satisfaction of certain conditions, including, among other things, approval of
the August 7, 2001 agreement by the membership of the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, approval of the agreement by the SEC as an interpretation of the
certificate of incorporation of the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and the
effectiveness of the registration statement of which this document is part, the
parties agreed, among other things, to clarify the nature and scope of the
exercise right in the context of the CBOT's proposed strategic restructuring
and the expanded operation of the CBOT's electronic trading system. In
addition, the CBOT agreed to dismiss pending litigation and the CBOE agreed to
withdraw its proposed interpretation and rule change that had been filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and to take no further action to amend,
modify, or otherwise limit, or terminate or cause to expire, the exercise right
as a result of the completion of the restructuring transactions except as
contemplated in the agreement.
On October 24, 2001, the CBOT, CBOT Holdings and the Chicago Board Options
Exchange entered into a letter agreement that, among other things, specified
the terms and conditions under which the August 7, 2001 agreement will apply
upon completion of the restructuring transactions as revised to provide for the
holding
9
company structure. For more information on the conditions and other terms of
the August 7, 2001 agreement and related letter agreement, see "Our Business--
Legal Proceedings--Chicago Board Options Exchange Dispute." For more
information on the risks associated with the exercise right, see "Risk
Factors--Risks Relating to the Restructuring Transactions--The "Exercise Right'
Could be Subject to Further Challenge by the Chicago Board Options Exchange."
You are being asked to vote to ratify the August 7, 2001 agreement entered
into by the CBOT and the Chicago Board Options Exchange. We have included as
Appendix E-1 and E-2 to this document a copy of the August 7, 2001 agreement
and related letter agreement, respectively. We urge you to review carefully
both agreements before voting on the restructuring transactions.
Differences in Rights
Following the completion of the restructuring transactions, you will become
stockholders in a Delaware stock, for-profit holding company and members of a
Delaware nonstock, for-profit corporation that will be a subsidiary of the
holding company, and you will no longer be members of a Delaware nonstock, not-
for-profit corporation. You should consider carefully the differences in your
rights and obligations that will result from this change in structure before
voting on the restructuring transactions.
Some of these differences arise from differences between the corporate law
applicable to the different types of organizations. Other differences arise
from choices that we have made in designing the certificate of incorporation
and bylaws of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary. We briefly summarize below
some of the important differences in your rights and obligations that will
result from completion of the restructuring transactions:
. Voting. The holders of the common stock of CBOT Holdings will have the
right to vote on all matters upon which the stockholders of CBOT Holdings
will be entitled to vote generally, including, among other things, the
election of directors to the board of directors of CBOT Holdings.
However, the holders of the common stock of CBOT Holdings will not be
entitled to initiate proposals to amend the certificate of incorporation
of CBOT Holdings or, as described below, the certificate of
incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary.
Although stockholders of CBOT Holdings will be able to initiate proposals
to amend the bylaws of CBOT Holdings, such proposals may only be brought
to a vote at an annual meeting of the stockholders after satisfying
certain advance notice requirements and will require the approval of two-
thirds of the voting power of the stockholders of CBOT Holdings entitled
to vote generally in the election of directors.
CBOT Holdings, as the holder of the sole Class A membership in the CBOT
subsidiary, will have the exclusive right to vote on most matters requiring
a vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, including among other things,
the election of directors to the board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary.
The holders of Class B and Class C memberships will not have voting rights
with respect to matters requiring a vote of the members of the CBOT
subsidiary except that Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B members will have
limited voting rights to approve changes that would adversely affect
certain core rights relating to the trading rights and privileges of
Class B members.
. Board of Directors. On October 16, 2001, our board of directors approved
and adopted amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws,
which, if approved by our members, would authorize our board of directors
to delay the next annual election, which is currently scheduled for
December 2001, until no later than March 31, 2002, reduce the size of our
board of directors from 18 members to nine members at the first annual
election following timely approval of the restructuring transactions by
our members, clarify our board of directors' discretion as to the timing
of its regular meetings and make certain other conforming changes. A
special meeting of the members for the purpose of voting on such
amendments has been scheduled for October 31, 2001. If our members
approve such amendments and separately approve the restructuring
transactions in a timely manner, our board of directors will be reduced
in size from 18 directors to nine directors in connection with the next
annual election, which
10
will be held as soon as reasonably practicable following membership approval
of the restructuring transactions, but in no event later than March 31,
2002. At such annual election, our members will elect eight new directors to
serve on the nine-member board of directors with the then current chairman
of the board continuing to serve in such capacity as the ninth member of
such board. Upon completion of the restructuring transactions, the new
directors elected to serve on the nine-member board of directors will
continue to serve on the boards of directors of both CBOT Holdings and the
CBOT subsidiary until the next annual meeting of each such corporation.
If the amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not
approved by our members or the membership vote on the restructuring
transactions does not occur in a timely manner, and, as a result, the size
of our board of directors is not reduced from 18 directors to nine directors
prior to the completion of the restructuring transactions, the certificate
of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings will provide that the then
current 18-member board of directors will continue as the boards of
directors of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary immediately following
completion of the restructuring transactions. The size of the board of
directors of CBOT Holdings will thereafter be reduced to nine directors in
connection with a special meeting of stockholders, to be held as soon as
reasonably practicable following completion of the restructuring
transactions. At such special meeting, the stockholders will elect eight new
directors to serve on the nine-member board of directors with the then
current chairman of the board continuing to serve in such capacity as the
ninth member of such board. In connection with the election of directors to
the new nine-member board of directors of CBOT Holdings, it is anticipated
that CBOT Holdings, as the sole Class A member of the CBOT subsidiary, will
elect each of the newly-elected directors serving on the nine-member board
of directors of CBOT Holdings as directors of the CBOT subsidiary. Each
director of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary will be elected to serve
as a director until the next annual meeting of each such corporation and
will not be subject to term limits.
In order to ensure that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings is generally
identical in size and composition to the board of directors of the CBOT
subsidiary, it will be a qualification for service as a director of the CBOT
subsidiary that such director also serve on the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings. The nine-member boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary will each consist of the chairman of the board, five directors
who are Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary, two directors who are
"independent" within the meaning of the certificate of incorporation and
bylaws of CBOT Holdings and one director who is "at-large," or generally not
subject to qualifications. We currently expect that the president and chief
executive officer of CBOT Holdings will be nominated for election as the
at-large director.
. Committees. In general, CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary will have a
limited number of board committees and certain board and other committees
currently maintained by the CBOT will be eliminated in order to further
streamline our corporate governance structure. We currently expect that
CBOT Holdings will have a nominating committee of the board, an executive
committee of the board, an audit committee of the board and a
compensation committee of the board. In addition to these committees, we
currently anticipate that the boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and
the CBOT subsidiary will create or maintain certain non-board advisory
committees and other non-board committees comprised of directors,
officers and stockholders or members, as appropriate.
. Substantial Elimination of the Petition Process. Currently, voting
members of the CBOT have the right to vote on all amendments to the
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which include the rules of the
CBOT. In addition, members have the right to petition the board to call a
special meeting of members for the purpose of voting on amendments to the
bylaws and rules. This process, together with certain other provisions,
including those relating to the nomination procedures for elective
officers and the annual election, constitutes what is sometimes referred
to as the "petition process" of the CBOT membership.
In connection with the restructuring transactions, the petition process is
being substantially eliminated, with the principal exception consisting of
the limited voting rights of Series B-1 and B-2, Class B
11
members relating to certain core rights associated with the trading
rights and privileges of the Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary.
As a result, the ability of the holders of common stock of CBOT
Holdings and the Class B and Class C members of the CBOT subsidiary
to participate in the day-to-day management and operations of CBOT
Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary, respectively, will be significantly
reduced. In sharp contrast to the substantial rights of current CBOT
members pursuant to the petition process, stockholders of CBOT
Holdings will have rights more consistent with those of stockholders
of a publicly held corporation and members of the CBOT subsidiary
will have substantially reduced rights relative to the members of the
CBOT.
. Dividends. Although nonstock, not-for-profit corporations are permitted
to declare and pay dividends under Delaware law, dividends are a more
typical feature of stock, for-profit corporations. CBOT Holdings will
generally have the ability to declare and pay dividends to its common
stockholders out of its "surplus" as defined under Delaware law. The
board of directors of CBOT Holdings will be able to determine, in its
sole and absolute discretion, the time of declarations and payments, and
the amounts, if any, of dividends on the common stock. It is not
currently anticipated that CBOT Holdings will pay cash dividends on its
common stock in the near future; however, CBOT Holdings may later
determine to pay cash dividends out of its available surplus.
. Capital Stock. Under the terms of its certificate of incorporation,
following completion of the restructuring transactions, CBOT Holdings
will be authorized to issue over 60,000,000 additional shares of common
stock and up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, in each case,
without stockholder approval. The certificate of incorporation of CBOT
Holdings will authorize the board of directors, without approval of the
stockholders, to cause CBOT Holdings to issue shares of preferred stock
from time to time in one or more series, to establish the number of
shares to be included in each series and to fix the rights, preferences
and privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series as well as
any qualifications, limitations or restrictions on the shares.
. Change of Control Provisions. CBOT Holdings' certificate of incorporation
and bylaws will contain a number of provisions that may have the effect of
encouraging persons considering unsolicited tender offers or other
unilateral takeover proposals to negotiate with the board of directors
rather than pursue non-negotiated takeover attempts. The provisions will
include, among other things:
. advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals;
. application of the Delaware anti-takeover statute;
. a requirement that special meetings of the stockholders of CBOT Holdings
be called by only the chairman of the board, the president or the board
of directors;
. a prohibition on the ability of stockholders to take action by written
consent; and
. a requirement that any stockholder proposal to amend the bylaws be
approved by at least two-thirds of the voting power of all outstanding
shares of capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors.
In addition, we currently anticipate that the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings would be asked to consider, and may adopt, a stockholder rights
plan or "poison pill" in connection with any underwritten public offering
of its common stock. We have no current plan or intention to conduct such
an offering.
For more information about the differences in the rights and obligations of
CBOT members, CBOT Holdings stockholders and the CBOT subsidiary members, see
"Comparison of the Rights of Members of the CBOT Prior to and After Completion
of the Restructuring Transactions."
Transfer Restrictions
The shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings will generally be subject to a
complete restriction on transfer for the first 270 days following the date the
common stock is issued. Thereafter, 15%, 25%, 25% and
12
35% of the shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings will be eligible for
transfer after the date that is 270, 450, 630 and 810 days following the date
the common stock is issued, respectively. Notwithstanding these restrictions on
transfer, stockholders may transfer all, but not less than all, of the shares
of common stock associated with a Class B membership and, to the extent
applicable, a Class C membership, in the CBOT subsidiary if all such shares of
common stock are transferred together with the associated Class B membership
and, to the extent applicable, Class C membership. The certificate of
incorporation of CBOT Holdings will grant authority to the board of directors
to remove or reduce this restriction on transfer of the common stock if it
determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that such action is
appropriate.
Although Class B memberships in the CBOT subsidiary generally will not be
subject to any transfer restrictions, the exercise of the trading rights and
privileges associated with the Class B memberships will be subject to
substantially the same application and approval process that currently applies
to CBOT membership candidates. Under that process, any adult, other than an
employee of the CBOT subsidiary, of good character, reputation, financial
responsibility and credit will be eligible to become a Class B member of, and
exercise trading rights and privileges at, the CBOT subsidiary. Candidates will
be reviewed to determine whether they meet applicable requirements in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary.
The Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary generally will also not be
subject to any transfer restrictions. However, a holder of a Class C membership
seeking to become a member of the Chicago Board Options Exchange must hold
25,000 shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings and one Series B-1, Class B
membership, along with such Class C membership, in each case subject to certain
adjustments, in order to be eligible to become a member of the Chicago Board
Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership in such exchange. For
more information, see "Shares Eligible for Future Sale."
In addition to the restrictions discussed above, shares of common stock of
CBOT Holdings received in connection with the restructuring transactions by
"affiliates" may be resold only pursuant to further registration under the
Securities Act or in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act.
For more information, see "Shares Eligible for Future Sale."
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
We are seeking a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service to the effect
that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, you will not recognize any gain or
loss strictly as a result of receiving shares of common stock in CBOT Holdings
and Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary or as a result of
CBOT Holdings receiving a Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary in
connection with the restructuring transactions. Assuming this non-recognition
treatment, the tax basis in your membership will carry over to your common
stock of CBOT Holdings and memberships in the CBOT subsidiary. Receipt of a
favorable ruling from the IRS with respect to the receipt by members of Class B
and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary and receipt of a favorable
ruling from the IRS or an opinion of counsel with respect to the receipt by
CBOT Holdings of a Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary and receipt by
members of common stock in CBOT Holdings, in each case, in form and substance
satisfactory to our board, are conditions to our obligation to complete the
restructuring transactions.
We anticipate that the receipt of a cash payment by the limited partners of
Ceres in connection with the reorganization of our electronic trading business
will be taxable to such limited partners.
For more information, see "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Restructuring Transactions."
Accounting Matters
The accounting treatment of certain aspects of the restructuring
transactions will be treated similar to a reorganization of entities under
common control. Under this method of accounting, no gain or loss will be
13
recognized, and the assets and liabilities of CBOT will appear on the books of
CBOT Holdings at their same recorded amounts. For more information, see "The
Restructuring Transactions--Accounting Matters."
Regulatory Matters
The completion of the restructuring transactions is subject to our receipt
of any approvals required by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in
connection with the proposed changes to our certificate of incorporation,
bylaws and rules and regulations that will be made in connection with the
restructuring transactions and confirmation by the CFTC that implementation of
the restructuring transactions will not have a material adverse effect on our
current contract market designation.
In addition, the restructuring transactions may be subject to certain
regulatory requirements of other state, federal and foreign governmental
agencies and authorities. We are currently working to evaluate and comply in
all material respects with these requirements and do not currently anticipate
that they will delay completion of the restructuring transactions.
For more information, see "The Restructuring Transactions--Regulatory
Matters."
Conditions to Completing the Restructuring Transactions
We will not be obligated to complete the restructuring transactions unless
and until each of the following conditions has been satisfied:
. the members of the CBOT have approved each of the three propositions
being submitted for their approval in connection with the restructuring
transactions;
. we have received (1) a favorable ruling from the IRS that receipt by
members of Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary and
(2) a favorable ruling from the IRS or an opinion of counsel that
receipt by CBOT Holdings of a Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary
and receipt by members of common stock of CBOT Holdings, in each case,
in form and substance satisfactory to our board of directors, will not
result in the recognition of gain or loss to our members under U.S.
federal tax law;
. we have received any approvals required by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission in connection with changes to our corporate governance
structure and we have confirmed with the CFTC that implementation of the
restructuring transactions will not have a material adverse effect on
our current contract market designation, and we have received any other
governmental or regulatory approvals and authorizations determined by us
to be necessary;
. we have received each required material third party consent;
. there is no court order or other regulation prohibiting or restricting
the restructuring transactions; and
. our board of directors has not determined that the restructuring
transactions are no longer in the best interests of the CBOT and its
members or that the restructuring transactions are not fair to each
class of CBOT membership.
For more information, see "The Restructuring Transactions--Conditions to
Completing the Restructuring Transactions."
Market for Shares and Memberships; Stock Exchange Listing
No market presently exists for the common stock of CBOT Holdings. A market
for shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings may develop following the
expiration of any applicable restrictions on transfer. However, we cannot
provide any assurances in this regard. We have no current plans to list the
common stock of CBOT Holdings on any stock exchange.
14
We currently expect that a market for the Class B and Class C memberships in
the CBOT subsidiary will develop that is similar to the current market for CBOT
memberships. The current markets for memberships in the CBOT should facilitate
the development of new markets for the corresponding Class B and Class C
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary.
Risk Factors
There are significant risks associated with the restructuring transactions
that you should consider very carefully. These risks include, among other
things, our ability to implement in a timely and successful manner changes to
our organizational and corporate governance structure that are required in
order to operate more efficiently. Although we have a long history of operating
as a successful member-owned institution, significant changes will be required
in the manner in which we evaluate and undertake activities. For more
information about these and other risks, see "Risk Factors" beginning on page
19 below.
Matters To Be Approved; Vote Required
Full Members and Associate Members are being asked to approve the
restructuring transactions described in this document, including (1) the
approval and adoption of the agreement and plan of merger relating to the
merger of the CBOT with a newly formed nonstock, for-profit corporation, which
will facilitate the demutualization of the CBOT, (2) ratification of the August
7, 2001 agreement relating to the exercise right entered into by the CBOT and
the Chicago Board Options Exchange and (3) the approval of all other matters
relating to the restructuring transactions, including a new certificate of
incorporation and bylaws for CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary, and certain
changes to the rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary, which,
collectively, are designed to modernize certain aspects of our corporate
governance structure, and the reorganization of our electronic trading
business. Unless all three of these propositions are approved, the
restructuring transactions will not have been approved by the members and,
accordingly, will not be completed.
The restructuring transactions will be approved if Full Members and
Associate Members, voting together as a single class based upon their
respective voting rights, cast at least 300 votes at the special meeting, in
person or by proxy ballot, and at least a majority of the votes cast are in
favor of each of the three propositions being submitted for their approval in
connection with the restructuring transactions. Full Members will be entitled
to one vote for each Full Membership owned and Associate Members will be
entitled to one-sixth of one vote for each Associate Membership owned. No other
class of membership will be entitled to vote on the restructuring transactions.
For more information, see "Special Meeting and Proxy Information--Available
Votes; Required Vote."
Absence of Appraisal Rights
Members who object to the restructuring transactions will have no appraisal
rights under Delaware law. If the restructuring transactions are completed and
regardless of whether you voted for or against the restructuring transactions,
your membership in the CBOT will be eliminated and you will receive shares of
common stock of CBOT Holdings and memberships in the CBOT subsidiary, in each
case, as described in this document.
For more information, see "The Restructuring Transactions--Absence of
Appraisal Rights."
Board Recommendation
Our board of directors has determined that the restructuring transactions
are in the best interests of the CBOT and its members and that the
restructuring transactions are fair to each class of CBOT membership. Our board
of directors has approved the restructuring transactions and recommends that
you vote "FOR" approval of each of the three propositions being submitted for
your approval in connection with the restructuring transactions.
15
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth a summary of consolidated financial and other
information for the CBOT. The balance sheet data as of December 31, 2000 and
1999 and operating data for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this document. The balance sheet data as of
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and operating data for the years ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996 have been derived from the audited financial
statements and related notes not included in this document. The balance sheet
and operating data as of, and for each of the six months ended, June 30, 2001
and 2000 are unaudited but include, in the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for
a fair presentation of such data. The results of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the entire year. The information set forth below should be read in
conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations," the consolidated financial statements and the
related notes, the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements and other financial information included elsewhere in this document.
Six Months Ended
June 30, Year Ended December 31,
------------------ ------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Data
Total revenues......... $119,572 $107,740 $212,919 $202,896 $205,238 $175,385 $154,578
Operating expenses..... 105,228 107,240 215,546 214,529 188,320 148,186 123,808
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from
operations........ 14,344 500 (2,627) (11,633) 16,918 27,199 30,770
Other income and
expenses
Interest income...... 589 671 1,242 1,052 1,947 2,090 1,986
Interest expense..... 3,359 2,721 6,773 6,774 7,170 6,483 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss)
before income
taxes and
cumulative effect
of change in
accounting
principle......... 11,574 (1,550) (8,158) (17,355) 11,695 22,806 32,756
Provision (benefit)
for income taxes...... 4,927 1,406 1,950 (2,895) 5,051 6,147 13,109
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before
cumulative effect of
changes in
accounting
principle........... 6,647 (2,956) (10,108) (14,460) 6,644 16,659 19,647
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle--net of tax
of $36 (1) and $2,026
(2), respectively..... 51 -- -- 2,920 -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss)
before minority
interest.......... 6,596 (2,956) (10,108) (17,380) 6,644 16,659 19,647
Minority interest in
(income) loss of
subsidiaries.......... -- -- -- 6,933 (38) (6,995) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss).. $ 6,596 $ (2,956) $(10,108) $(10,447) $ 6,606 $ 9,664 $ 19,647
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Balance Sheet Data
Total assets........... $361,650 $364,290 $372,194 $373,379 $400,971 $397,449 $355,585
Total liabilities...... 163,594 166,098 180,874 172,405 189,924 193,538 160,765
Short-term borrowings.. 21,538 23,214 27,296 6,500 -- 1,662 14,357
Long-term debt......... 59,976 64,286 64,286 87,500 100,726 105,000 76,166
Total equity .......... 198,056 198,192 191,320 200,974 211,047 203,911 194,820
Proforma Data (3)
Total assets........... $358,790 $364,290 $372,194 $373,379 $400,971 $397,449 $355,585
Total liabilities...... 183,594 166,098 180,874 172,405 189,924 193,538 160,765
Short-term borrowings.. 21,538 23,214 27,296 6,500 -- 1,662 14,357
Long-term debt......... 79,976 64,286 64,286 87,500 100,726 105,000 76,166
Total equity .......... 175,196 198,192 191,320 200,974 211,047 203,911 194,820
Net income (loss)...... 6,596 (2,956) (10,108) (10,447) 6,606 9,664 19,647
Net income (loss) per
share (4)............. 0.17 (0.07) (0.25) (0.26) 0.17 0.24 0.49
Other Data
Current ratio (5)...... 0.80 0.64 0.68 1.02 1.41 1.42 1.15
Working capital
(deficit)............. $(13,771) $(22,742) $(24,149) $ 1,067 $ 18,574 $ 18,457 $ 7,729
Capital expenditures... 9,720 15,847 38,497 25,165 26,985 48,529 90,393
Times interest earned
(6)................... 4.45 N/A N/A N/A 2.63 4.52 N/A
Number of full time
employees at end of
period................ 700 758 711 846 853 805 811
Sales price per Full
CBOT membership
High................. $ 350 $ 642 $ 642 $ 632 $ 780 $ 857 $ 690
Low.................. 290 410 255 400 384 660 531
16
--------
(1) In 2001, the CBOT adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities," as amended and interpreted, requiring recognition of all
derivative instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition as either assets or liabilities and the measurement of those
instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 133 also requires changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments to be recorded each period in current
earnings or other comprehensive income depending on the intended use of the
derivatives.
(2) In 1999, the CBOT adopted Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-5, "Reporting on
the Costs of Start-Up Activities." SOP 98-5 requires that start-up
activities be expensed as incurred. Previously, start-up activities were
capitalized and amortized.
(3) Reflects the conversion of members' equity to common stock of CBOT
Holdings.
(4) Based on 39,802,650 shares issued and outstanding immediately following
completion of the restructuring transactions.
(5) Equals current assets divided by current liabilities.
(6) Equals the sum of income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle and provision (benefit) for income taxes plus interest
expense, divided by interest expense.
17
RISK FACTORS
If the restructuring transactions are completed, you will receive shares of
common stock of CBOT Holdings and a membership or memberships in the CBOT
subsidiary. Therefore, you should carefully consider each of the following
risks and uncertainties, and all other information set forth in this document,
before deciding whether to vote for or against the restructuring transactions.
The following risks relate principally to:
. the restructuring transactions, particularly the demutualization;
. our business in general and the industry in which we operate;
. regulations applicable to our business and litigation in which we
are, or may be, involved; and
. changes in our corporate governance structure that will be
implemented as part of the restructuring transactions.
You should be aware that the risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only risks and uncertainties we are facing or will face in the future.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we
currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business.
This document contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. The results of CBOT Holdings could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including the risks and uncertainties faced by CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary described below and elsewhere in this document.
Risks Relating to the Restructuring Transactions
We are subject to the following risks in connection with the restructuring
transactions, particularly our demutualization. Certain other risks relating to
changes in our governing documents in connection with the restructuring
transactions are described below under "--Risks Relating to Changes in Our
Corporate Governance Structure."
We Have No Internal Experience and Little Representative External Experience
Upon Which to Rely in Operating as a For-Profit Futures Exchange
We have been operating as a nonstock, not-for-profit corporation for the
benefit of our members. As such, we have been a mutual organization focused on
delivering member benefits and enhancing member opportunity at reasonable cost.
After the restructuring transactions are completed, CBOT Holdings will be
operated for the long-term benefit of its stockholders rather than solely for
the purpose of delivering member benefits and enhancing member opportunity. In
addition, after the restructuring transactions are completed, the CBOT
subsidiary will itself become a for-profit corporation. Although our management
has experience operating a for-profit corporation, they have no experience, and
there is relatively little history of or experience by other U.S. futures
exchanges, operating a for-profit futures exchange. Consequently, our
transition to for-profit operations will be subject to risks, expenses and
difficulties that we cannot predict and may not be capable of handling in an
efficient manner.
Our Holding Company Structure May Not Achieve its Intended Benefits
We believe that a holding company structure provides us increased
flexibility to operate in a manner that will allow us to pursue our strategic
goals while preserving certain desirable attributes of nonstock membership
corporations. The expected benefits of the holding company structure may not be
realized if market conditions, the regulatory environment or other
circumstances limit us from pursuing our strategic goals. As a result, we could
incur the costs of maintaining a holding company structure without realizing
all of its intended benefits. In addition, the holding company structure may
not successfully insulate CBOT Holdings or any of its subsidiaries from each
other. If we do not observe corporate formalities or adequately capitalize the
subsidiaries of CBOT Holdings, CBOT Holdings could be liable for the
liabilities of its subsidiaries.
18
As a Holding Company, CBOT Holdings will be Totally Dependent on Distributions
and Dividends from its Operating Subsidiaries to Pay Dividends and Other
Obligations.
CBOT Holdings will initially have no business operations of its own. The
only significant asset of CBOT Holdings will be the Class A membership in the
CBOT subsidiary. As a result, CBOT Holdings will rely on distributions from the
CBOT subsidiary to meet its obligations. We currently expect that most of the
earnings and cash flow of the CBOT subsidiary will be retained and used by it
in its operations, including to service any debt obligations it may have now or
in the future.
The "Exercise Right," Could be Subject to Further Challenge by the Chicago
Board Options Exchange
Notwithstanding entry into the August 7, 2001 agreement and related letter
agreement, we cannot assure you that the Chicago Board Options Exchange will
not take other actions in the future to challenge or interfere with the
exercise right in reliance upon its interpretation of these agreements, the
1992 agreement or article fifth (b) of the Chicago Board Options Exchange's
certificate of incorporation that granted the exercise right in 1973. We also
cannot assure you that the Chicago Board Options Exchange will not otherwise be
successful in terminating the exercise right or preventing Full Members from
exercising such right in the future in response to future innovations by the
CBOT in implementing its business strategies, especially in the area of
electronic trading.
For more information on the Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right
and the Chicago Board Options Exchange's recent attempts to restrict the scope
of the exercise right, see "Our Business--Legal Proceedings--Chicago Board
Options Exchange Dispute."
Certain Members Have Filed a Complaint in Illinois State Court Challenging the
Proposed Allocation of Equity in the CBOT
Certain Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs have instituted litigation
in Cook County Circuit Court against certain individual Full Members and a
proposed class of all Full Members alleging that the proposed allocation of
equity in the CBOT as part of the restructuring transactions unfairly favors
Full Members to the detriment of Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs. The
individual plaintiffs seek to represent a class of all Associate Members, GIMs,
IDEMs and COMs, and have requested, among other things, that the court enjoin
Full Members from voting in favor of the allocation contemplated by the
restructuring transactions and that the court declare a fair and equitable
allocation of shares among the members. On March 23, 2001, the circuit court
granted the defendant's motion to stay these proceedings and compel arbitration
under the CBOT's rules and regulations. Plaintiffs have appealed that ruling to
the Illinois Court of Appeals. Although we believe that the plaintiffs'
position is without merit, we cannot provide any assurances as to the outcome
of this matter or that the plaintiffs will not succeed in preventing or
delaying the vote which is the subject of this proxy solicitation or in
altering the proposed allocation of equity in the restructuring transactions.
Additionally, we cannot assure you that the plaintiffs will not attempt to
pursue other remedies, such as damages, in the event that the restructuring
transactions are completed on the terms proposed in this document. For more
information, see "Our Business--Legal Proceedings--Minority Member Litigation."
We Have Not Determined or Received Any Opinion Regarding the Value of the CBOT
Before or After the Restructuring Transactions or the Value of the Securities
You Will Receive in the Restructuring Transactions Compared to the Value of the
Memberships You Currently Own
We have not determined the value of the CBOT in its current form as a mutual
organization or its value as a for-profit corporation after the restructuring
transactions, nor have we determined the value of the securities that will be
issued in respect of memberships in the restructuring transactions. The
fairness opinions that we have received from William Blair and from Arthur
Andersen are limited in scope and do not address either of the foregoing
valuation matters. Accordingly, we can give you no assurance that the value of
CBOT Holdings will be at least equal to the value of the CBOT or that the value
of the securities of CBOT Holdings will be at least equal to the value of the
corresponding memberships in the CBOT that you currently own.
19
The Allocation of the Equity in CBOT Holdings Depends on Several Relative
Factors
The Independent Allocation Committee and our board of directors considered a
number of factors in determining the allocation of equity in CBOT Holdings
among the existing CBOT members in connection with the restructuring
transactions. The Independent Allocation Committee based its recommendation on
a combination of factors including, among other things, relative voting rights,
relative liquidation rights, the allocation of partnership interests in
connection with the formation of Ceres, membership or seat prices and contract
volumes. There are other equity allocation methods that could be applied and,
if applied, might produce different results. However, the Independent
Allocation Committee and our board of directors have determined that the
proposed allocation will accomplish a fair allocation of the common stock in
CBOT Holdings among the members in respect of their memberships. See "The
Restructuring Transactions--Independent Allocation Committee of the Board" for
more information regarding the Independent Allocation Committee and the
allocation methodology.
Certain members of the CBOT have initiated litigation against certain Full
Members in the Cook County Circuit Court challenging our allocation
determination. For more information regarding this litigation, see "--Certain
Members Have Filed a Complaint in Illinois State Court Challenging the Proposed
Allocation of Equity in the CBOT" above and "Our Business--Legal Proceedings--
Minority Member Litigation."
Your Voting Rights Will Change as a Result of the Restructuring Transactions
and Full Members Will Experience Dilution in Their Relative Voting Powers
As a result of the allocation of common stock of CBOT Holdings among members
and the substantial limitation on the voting rights of Class B and Class C
members of the CBOT subsidiary resulting from completion of the restructuring
transactions, Full Members will experience dilution of their voting power on
general matters relative to the voting power of Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs
and COMs on such matters. This is a material change in your voting rights. Our
current certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the Full Members
are entitled to one vote per membership and Associate Members are entitled to
one-sixth of one vote per membership on all matters subject to a membership
vote, while GIMs, IDEMs and COMs do not have the right to vote on any matters.
Upon completion of the restructuring transactions, the holders of the common
stock of CBOT Holdings will have the right to vote on all matters upon which
the stockholders of CBOT Holdings will be entitled to vote generally, including
among other things, the election of directors to the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings. CBOT Holdings, as the holder of the sole Class A membership in the
CBOT subsidiary, will have the exclusive right to vote on most matters
requiring a vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, including among other
things, the election of directors to the board of directors of the CBOT
subsidiary. The holders of Class B and Class C memberships will not have voting
rights with respect to matters requiring a vote of the members of the CBOT
subsidiary, except that holders of Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B
memberships will have limited voting rights to approve changes that would
adversely affect certain core rights relating to the trading rights and
privileges of the Class B memberships. To the extent that they remain holders
of the common stock of CBOT Holdings, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs who do not currently
have voting rights in the CBOT will be entitled as common stockholders to vote
on all matters submitted to the stockholders of CBOT Holdings for a vote. See
"The Restructuring Transactions--Independent Allocation Committee of the Board"
and "Description of Capital Stock."
Your Relative Liquidation Rights Will Change as a Result of the Restructuring
Transactions and Full Members and GIMs Will Experience Dilution in Their
Relative Liquidation Rights
As a result of the allocation of common stock of CBOT Holdings among members
and the exclusive right of CBOT Holdings as the sole Class A member of the CBOT
subsidiary to share in the proceeds of liquidation of the CBOT subsidiary
resulting from completion of the restructuring transactions, Full Members and
GIMs will experience dilution of their liquidation rights in CBOT Holdings
relative to the liquidation rights of Associate Members, IDEMs and COMs. Our
current certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the members would
share in the proceeds upon liquidation in a ratio of 1.000 : 0.167 : 0.111 :
0.005 : 0.005 to each Full Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM,
respectively. This represents an implied allocation
20
among Full Members, Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs as follows: 6.00 :
1.00 : 0.67 : 0.03 : 0.03. Upon completion of the restructuring transactions,
CBOT Holdings common stockholders will have the right to share in the proceeds
of liquidation of CBOT Holdings pro rata on the basis of the number of shares
of common stock owned and CBOT Holdings, as the sole Class A member of the CBOT
subsidiary, will have the exclusive right to share in the proceeds of
liquidation of the CBOT subsidiary.
Accordingly, upon completion of the restructuring transactions, the proceeds
upon liquidation would be shared among CBOT Holdings common stockholders in
accordance with the ratio used to allocate equity in CBOT Holdings pursuant to
the restructuring transactions, which is 5.0 : 1.0 : 0.5 : 0.06 : 0.07 to each
Full Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM, respectively. This will
increase somewhat the liquidation rights of stockholders who are now Associate
Members, IDEMs and COMs and will reduce in a corresponding manner the relative
liquidation rights of stockholders who are now Full Members and GIMs. See "The
Restructuring Transactions--Independent Allocation Committee of the Board" and
"Description of Capital Stock."
Our Business May Be Materially Adversely Affected if We Do Not Timely Complete
the Restructuring Transactions
If we fail to complete the restructuring transactions substantially in a
timely fashion, our business may be materially adversely affected.
Specifically, we believe that we would likely be significantly less capable of
making decisions on important issues in an expeditious manner, responding
rapidly to the technological innovations currently shaping the derivatives
markets, maximizing the value of our organization or achieving the other
benefits we expect to achieve in connection with the restructuring
transactions, all of which are important to our business strategy. Although we
currently plan to complete the restructuring transactions as promptly as
reasonably practicable following satisfaction of all conditions, we cannot
assure you as to whether or when implementation of the restructuring
transactions will occur. This means that we cannot assure you that we will
obtain the expected benefits or as to the timing of any such benefits. For more
information about the restructuring transactions and the benefits we expect to
achieve in connection with the restructuring transactions, see "The
Restructuring Transactions--Background of the Restructuring Transactions--
Reasons for the Restructuring Strategy."
We May Incur Material, Unanticipated Costs in Connection with the
Restructuring Transactions
We have already incurred substantial expenses in connection with the
restructuring transactions and have planned for additional expenditures
necessary for completion of the transactions. We may, however, incur additional
significant costs and expenses greater than those we have planned for in
connection with the restructuring transactions. We cannot assure you that these
additional costs will not be material to our business.
We Will Be Unable to Complete the Restructuring Transactions Unless We Can
Obtain a Favorable Ruling from the IRS and/or an Opinion of Counsel
We have designed and structured the restructuring transactions with the
intention that neither the CBOT nor its members will recognize any gain or loss
for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the demutualization. We
currently expect to file a request for a ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service in the near future to the effect that you will not recognize gain or
loss strictly as a result of the receipt of shares of common stock in CBOT
Holdings and Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary or as a
result of the receipt by CBOT Holdings of the Class A membership in the CBOT
subsidiary in connection with the restructuring transactions. Because there is
limited authority for the tax treatment of the demutualization aspect of our
restructuring transactions, we cannot be sure that the IRS will issue the
requested ruling or, if issued, that we will receive the requested ruling in
the near future. Generally speaking, if the IRS issues a ruling, it is not
received by the requesting company until at least four months after the initial
filing of the ruling request. Moreover, this process can, under certain
circumstances, take significantly longer. Receipt of a favorable ruling
21
from the IRS with respect to receipt by the members of Class B and Class C
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary and receipt of a favorable ruling from the
IRS or an opinion of counsel with respect to the receipt by CBOT Holdings of
the Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary and receipt by members of common
stock in CBOT Holdings, in each case, in form and substance satisfactory to our
board, are conditions to our obligation to complete the restructuring
transactions, and we will not complete the restructuring transactions unless
and until we receive the ruling and/or opinion, as applicable. Even if we do
receive the requested ruling from the IRS, any significant delay in the
implementation of the restructuring transactions caused by the IRS could
jeopardize our ability to achieve the expected benefits of the restructuring
transactions.
We Will Be Unable to Complete the Restructuring Transactions Unless We Can
Obtain Necessary Regulatory Approvals, Including from the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission
In order to complete the restructuring transactions, we currently anticipate
that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission will be asked to approve changes
to our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations, and that
the CFTC will be asked to confirm that implementation of the restructuring
transactions will not have a material adverse effect on our current contract
market designation. If these CFTC approvals and any other necessary regulatory
approvals and authorizations cannot be obtained, we may not be able to complete
the restructuring transactions and any delay in the implementation of the
restructuring transactions caused by the CFTC or other regulators may
jeopardize the expected benefits of the restructuring transactions. Generally
speaking, we currently expect that it could take several months to receive the
necessary approvals from the CFTC. We cannot assure you that the CFTC and other
regulatory approvals will be obtained in connection with the restructuring
transactions or, if obtained, that the approvals will be timely received.
Common Stockholders of CBOT Holdings May Support Decisions That Are Contrary
to the Interests of Members of the CBOT Subsidiary
Following completion of the restructuring transactions, it will be possible
for persons who are not holders of memberships in the CBOT subsidiary, and
therefore are not entitled to and do not utilize trading rights and privileges
in the CBOT subsidiary, to hold voting securities of CBOT Holdings, either as a
result of future capital raising activities, if any, or as a result of the sale
or transfer of the shares of common stock to be issued in the restructuring
transactions after expiration of applicable transfer restrictions. In addition,
the holders of Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary will
generally not have the right to vote on matters upon which CBOT Holdings, as
the holder of the sole Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary, will be
entitled to vote generally, including the right to elect directors. Because
holders of common stock of CBOT Holdings may have solely an economic interest
in the CBOT subsidiary and no interest in the trading opportunities made
available by the CBOT subsidiary, they may be more likely to advocate that CBOT
Holdings use its control over the CBOT subsidiary to maximize the long-term
enterprise value of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary rather than to
enhance or protect the trading opportunities available to the Class B members
of the CBOT subsidiary or the exercise right associated with the Class C
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary. This could lead to decisions or outcomes
that are contrary to the interests of Class B and Class C members of the CBOT
subsidiary.
The Absence of a Prior Public Market Limits Our Ability to Predict Whether and
to What Extent a Public Market Will Develop in Our Shares
Immediately after the restructuring transactions, all of the common stock of
CBOT Holdings will be held by the members of our organization. There will be no
outside investors in CBOT Holdings' common stock and no market for such stock
at that time. Because we are not offering any shares to outside investors at
this time, we have not undertaken the traditional marketing activities
associated with bringing a company to the public markets. Moreover, we have no
current plans to undertake such activities or to list our shares on a stock
exchange. We do not know whether third parties will find our shares to be an
attractive investment, or whether firms will be interested in making a market
in our stock. Consequently, we cannot assure you that any trading market for
any shares of our capital stock will develop or, if one or more develops, how
strong it may be.
22
We Cannot Assure You That an Orderly Market in Our Common Stock Will Develop
The shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings will generally be subject to a
complete restriction on transfer for the first 270 days following the date the
common stock is issued. Thereafter, 15%, 25%, 25% and 35% of the shares of
common stock of CBOT Holdings will be eligible for transfer after the date that
is 270, 450, 630 and 810 days following the date the common stock is issued,
respectively. We have imposed transfer restrictions on the shares of common
stock of CBOT Holdings in order to encourage the development of an orderly
market in our common stock. We cannot give any assurance that these
restrictions will achieve their intended purpose. In addition, if our
stockholders sell a large number of shares of our common stock upon the
expiration of some or all of the transfer restrictions, the market prices for
our common stock could decline significantly.
The Market Price for Our Shares May Fluctuate Widely and Trade at Prices Below
the Recent Price of Memberships of the CBOT
The market price of the shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings received by
you in the restructuring transactions may fluctuate widely. Factors causing
these fluctuations will include our perceived prospects, the prospects of the
financial and futures industries and exchanges in general, and differences
between our actual financial and operating results and those expected by
investors. Changes in general economic or market conditions and broad market
fluctuations may influence the market price for our stock. In addition, the
trading rights and privileges associated with CBOT memberships will not be
associated with the common stock of CBOT Holdings after completion of the
restructuring transactions. As a result, the shares of common stock of CBOT
Holdings may trade at prices significantly below the price of the CBOT
memberships in respect of which they were issued.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Our business, and the value of the stock to be issued by CBOT Holdings, are
subject to the following risks, which include risks relating to the industry in
which we operate.
We May Be Unable to Meet Our Future Capital and Liquidity Requirements
Due primarily to lower than historical volumes in our open outcry trading
market and the significant capital expenditures relating to the development and
launch of our newly established electronic trading system and the support of
our open outcry system, we had a working capital deficit for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 of about $14 million. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to meet our future capital expenditure requirements or that we will be
able to secure any additional financing to meet our working capital and capital
expenditure requirements. For more information regarding these and other
factors affecting our liquidity, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital
Resources."
As a Result of Reductions in Our Workforce, We May Lack Sufficient Personnel
to Run CBOT Holdings and the CBOT Subsidiary
We have experienced a significant reduction in staffing over the last two
years. From January 2000 through June 30, 2001, the number of our employees has
decreased by 157, which represented about an 18% reduction in our total
workforce. In addition, on September 19, 2001, we further reduced our staffing
by eliminating 51 positions. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
successfully run our business with this reduced number of employees. We may
desire or need to recruit additional employees. However, we cannot assure you
that we can successfully recruit these persons.
Our Decision to Operate Both Pit-Based, Open Outcry Trading and Electronic
Trading, Including Our Commitment to Maintain Open Outcry Markets, May
Materially Adversely Affect Our Operating Costs, Markets and Profitability
It is expensive in terms of costs and management and other resources to
continue operating two trading systems for the same products. Our current
business strategy involves the operation of both pit-based, open
23
outcry trading and electronic trading systems for our products. In addition,
the certificate of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary will contain a
provision requiring the CBOT subsidiary to maintain current open outcry markets
so long as each such market is deemed liquid under the terms of the certificate
of incorporation unless the discontinuance of any such market is approved by
the holders of Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B members of the CBOT
subsidiary. As a result, the CBOT subsidiary will be obligated under the terms
of its certificate of incorporation to provide financial and other support to
these markets. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately fund or
manage both trading systems. This may result in resource allocation decisions
that adversely impact one or both systems. Also, if we continue to operate both
trading systems, liquidity on each may be less than the liquidity on a
competitive unified trading system, making our trading systems less attractive
and less competitive. As a result, our total revenues may be lower than if we
operated only open outcry trading or only electronic trading. Moreover, to the
extent that we continue to operate two trading systems, our board and
management may make decisions which are designed to enhance the continued
viability of two separate trading systems. These decisions may have a negative
impact on the overall competitiveness of each trading system.
We are Subject to Certain Risks Associated with the Globalization of Our
Business
We expect that the expansion of our electronic markets will increase the
portion of our business that is generated from outside the United States. We
have entered into a strategic alliance with the Eurex Group, a Swiss-German
group that operates the world's largest derivatives exchange, and that alliance
may be expanded to include other exchanges inside and outside the United
States. The globalization of our business presents a number of inherent risks,
including, among other things, the following:
. potential difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting receivables
through certain foreign legal systems;
. the evolving global tax treatment of electronic commerce, and the
possibility that foreign governments could adopt onerous or inconsistent
tax policies with respect to taxation of products traded on our markets
or of the services that we provide;
. tax rates in certain foreign countries may exceed those of the United
States and foreign earnings may be subject to withholding requirements or
the imposition of tariffs, exchange controls or other restrictions;
. listed derivatives markets are regulated in most developed nations, and
it may be impractical for us to secure or maintain the regulatory
approvals necessary for our markets to be accessible from one or more
nations;
. certain of our expenses are denominated in foreign currencies, including
expenses relating to the a/c/e system denominated in euros, which exposes
us to the risk of fluctuating exchange rates and we may not fully
eliminate this risk through our hedging activity;
. general economic and political conditions in the countries from which our
markets are accessed may have an adverse effect on our trading from those
countries; and
. it may be difficult to enforce our intellectual property rights in
certain foreign countries.
As we expand our business globally, our success will be dependent, in part,
on our ability to anticipate and manage these and other risks effectively. We
cannot assure you that these and other factors will not have a material adverse
effect on our business as a whole.
We May Not Be Successful in Executing our Electronic Trading Strategy
We have committed substantial resources to develop our electronic trading
capabilities. We began to offer our products electronically over the a/c/e
system, which is the product of our alliance with the Eurex Group, in August
2000. In implementing this system, we balanced the desire to maximize system
functionality against the
24
associated costs, in both capital expenditure and time to market. While we
believe these decisions will benefit our electronic trading capabilities, we
cannot assure you these initiatives will be successful. For instance:
. contract volume may be lower than the break-even volume on which we
budgeted costs for the a/c/e system, either because overall volume is
lower than our projections, because the portion of volume traded
electronically is lower than we projected or because our market share is
lower than we projected;
. competitors that offer systems capable of 24-hour trading may gain a
competitive advantage over the a/c/e system, which is not yet capable of
operating 24 hours a day; and
. users may prefer the features and technology of other systems or products
of other exchanges over ours.
We Are Subject to Certain Risks Relating to the Operation of an Electronic
Trading Market
The foundation of our electronic trading strategy is our alliance with the
Eurex Group. We have a perpetual license to use the base software and, with
Deutsche Borse AG and the Swiss Stock Exchange, we own and have the right to
use certain modifications to that software. If our alliance with the Eurex
Group is terminated, our agreements provide for the provision of transition
services while we find another technology platform and/or provider. However, we
cannot assure you that we would be able to replace this technology in a timely
or cost-effective manner. In addition, we cannot assure you that the Eurex
Group would provide such transition services if the alliance is terminated as a
result of a party's breach of such agreements.
We are subject to risks relating generally to the provision of electronic
transaction services which include our failure or inability to:
. purchase, develop or implement new, enhanced or updated versions of
electronic trading software;
. attract independent software vendors to write front-end software that
effectively accesses our electronic trading system;
. increase the number of devices, e.g., trading and order routing
terminals, capable of sending orders to our floor and to our electronic
trading system; and
. respond effectively to technological developments or service offerings by
competitors.
If our electronic trading operations are not successful, our business or future
financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely
affected.
Because We Do Not Control the Joint Venture, We Are Dependent Upon the
Cooperation of Our Joint Venture Partners
Our alliance with the Eurex Group involves significant risks. We cannot give
any assurance that the Eurex Group will share our views or long-term strategic
goals with respect to the development of electronic trading. The joint venture
operating agreement is not yet signed and is not likely to be finished until
decisions are made regarding its structure and functions. Although we have a
perpetual license to the base software and, with Deutsche Borse AG and the
Swiss Stock Exchange, own and have the right to use certain modifications to
the software that have been created to the present date, the alliance has
outsourced the operation of the system to Deutsche Borse Systems AG, a
subsidiary of Deutsche Borse AG. As a result, we will also be dependent upon
our venture partners for the day-to-day operation of the a/c/e system.
Our Decision Not to Fund the Development of Certain Upgrades to the a/c/e
System Could Significantly Harm Our Electronic Trading Operations
A principal objective of the agreements relating to our alliance with the
Eurex Group is the development of updates and enhancements to the common source
code for the software that operates the electronic markets of the CBOT and
Eurex. The parties' general agreement to share the cost of this development and
to deploy sufficient resources to achieve this objective is subject to a
party's unilateral right to decline to accept and pay
25
for an enhancement, in which case it would forego the right to use that
enhancement until it reimburses the other party for one-half of the costs
relating to the development of the update. We were granted a perpetual royalty-
free license to the Eurex Release 2.0 software on October 1, 1999, and we have
paid for or agreed to pay for certain other modifications that have been made
to the software since September 1998.
Our financial resources were depleted as a result of, among other things,
lower trading volumes in 2000 and the substantial expenditures necessary to
launch and operate the a/c/e system and support our open outcry system. In
order to conserve our financial resources and as a result of our belief that
the expected benefits would not justify the costs, we have declined to
participate in the development of the next release of the a/c/e software, a/c/e
Release 2.0. We understand that the Eurex Group is proceeding on its own with
the development of this release. We believe that the CBOT and the Eurex Group
are not obligated by the agreements between the parties to jointly fund the
development of any particular enhancement. If we later elect to use
enhancements contained in a/c/e Release 2.0, we will be obligated to reimburse
Deutsche Borse AG and the Swiss Stock Exchange for one-half of the development
costs of those enhancements. The Eurex Group has taken the position that our
agreements with them require Ceres to participate in the joint development of
a/c/e Release 2.0 and formally invoked the dispute resolution procedure
established under these agreements in connection with this issue. The parties
have commenced discussions to attempt to resolve this and other issues, but no
assurance can be made about whether, when or how this issue will be resolved.
For more information on this issue, see "Our Business--Execution Facilities--
Electronic Trading."
Intense Competition Could Materially Adversely Affect Our Market Share and
Financial Performance
The futures industry is highly competitive. Many of our competitors and
potential competitors are more established or have greater financial resources
than we do. We expect that competition will intensify in the future as a result
of continuing consolidation in the futures exchange industry and the increasing
automation of risk management services. Many of our competitors also have
greater marketing capabilities and financial, technological and personnel
resources.
Competitive pressures may cause us to re-evaluate our current business model
and strategy. For example, in an industry where substantially all derivatives
are traded electronically, the concept of an open outcry exchange, including
the services we provide and our sources of revenue, may change swiftly and
substantially. Increased development of the electronic trading markets could
increase substantially competition for some or all of the products and services
we currently provide.
In addition, our competitors may:
. respond more quickly to competitive pressures due to their corporate
governance structures, which may be more flexible and efficient than our
corporate-governance structure;
. develop similar products that are preferred by our customers;
. develop non-traditional alternative risk transfer products that compete
with our products;
. price their products and services more competitively;
. develop and expand their network infrastructures and service offerings
more efficiently;
. adapt more swiftly to new or emerging technologies and changes in client
requirements;
. utilize better, more user-friendly and more reliable technology;
. take greater advantage of acquisitions, alliances and other
opportunities;
. more effectively market, promote and sell their products and services;
. better leverage existing relationships with clients and strategic
partners or exploit better recognized brand names to market, distribute
and sell their services; and
. exploit regulatory disparities between traditional, regulated exchanges
and alternative markets that benefit from a reduced regulatory burden and
a lower-cost business model.
26
Our current and prospective competitors are numerous and include securities
exchanges, futures and options exchanges, market data and information vendors,
electronic communications networks, crossing systems and similar entities,
consortia of large customers and some of our clearing member firms and
interdealer brokerage firms. We may also face competition from computer
software companies and media and technology companies. The number of businesses
providing Internet-related financial services, which are sometimes referred to
as "e-commerce" businesses, has grown rapidly, and other companies have entered
into, or are forming, joint ventures or consortia to provide services similar
to those provided by us. Further, many of our competitors are already for-
profit companies with more modern corporate governance structures that enable
them to make decisions more quickly and efficiently and enhance their overall
competitiveness. For more information concerning the competitive nature of our
industry and the challenges we face, see "Our Business--Competition."
We Are Dependent Upon the Clearing Services of the Board of Trade Clearing
Corporation
Currently, all of the contracts traded on the CBOT and on our wholly owned
subsidiary, the MidAmerica Commodity Exchange, are cleared through the Board of
Trade Clearing Corporation. The Board of Trade Clearing Corporation has
agreements with our clearing members to provide clearing services and data
processing with respect to transactions on the CBOT and the MidAmerica
Exchange. Although the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation has agreed to
provide its services to our clearing members, you should be aware that the loss
of any of its services with respect to transactions on the CBOT may have a
material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, the Board of Trade
Clearing Corporation has entered into arrangements to provide clearing services
to parties unaffiliated and, in certain instances, in direct competition, with
the CBOT. As a result, the CBOT may experience some loss of service as a result
of the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation's reallocation of resources, which
could also have a material adverse effect on our operations. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to obtain alternative clearing and data processing
arrangements in a timely or cost-effective manner.
We Have No Written Contract For Clearing Services With Our Clearing
Organization
We believe that the services of the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation to
our clearing members provide us with a competitive advantage as the only
futures and options on futures exchange whose contracts are cleared through an
entity with a "AAA" rating by Standard & Poor's. However, we currently do not
have a written contract with the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation that would
obligate it to continue to provide its clearing services to our clearing
members. Although we are currently considering negotiating such a written
contract with the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation, we cannot assure you
that we will determine to do so or, if we so determine, that we will be
successful in entering into such a written contract.
Computer and Communications Systems Failures and Capacity Constraints Could
Harm Our Reputation and Our Business
Our failure to operate, monitor or maintain our computer systems and network
services or, if necessary, to find a replacement for our technology in a timely
and cost-effective manner could have a material adverse effect on our
reputation, business, financial condition and operating results. We rely and
expect to continue to rely on third parties for various computer and
communications systems, such as telephone companies, on-line service providers,
data processors, clearance organizations and software and hardware vendors. Our
systems or those of our third party providers may fail, causing one or more of
the following effects:
. unanticipated disruptions in service to customers;
. slower response times;
. delays in trade execution;
. decreased customer satisfaction;
. incomplete or inaccurate accounting, recording or processing of trades;
. financial losses;
27
. security breaches;
. litigation or other customer claims; and
. regulatory sanctions.
We cannot assure you that we will not experience system failures, outages or
interruptions that will materially adversely affect our business. Any failures
that cause an interruption in service or decrease our responsiveness, including
failures caused by customer error or misuse of our systems, could impair our
reputation, damage our brand name and have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and operating results.
We May Not Effectively Manage Our Growth
We intend to develop and expand our business, including both our open outcry
and electronic trading systems. This growth may place a significant strain on
our management, personnel, systems and resources. We must continue to improve
our operational and financial systems and managerial controls and procedures,
and we will need to continue to expand, train and manage our technology
workforce. We must also maintain close coordination among our technology,
compliance, accounting, finance, marketing and sales organizations. We cannot
assure you that we will manage our growth effectively, and failure to do so
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
operating results.
We May Not Be Able to Keep Up With Rapid Technological Changes
To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the
responsiveness, functionality, accessibility and features of our proprietary
software, network distribution systems and other technologies. The financial
services and e-commerce industries are characterized by rapid technological
change, changes in use and customer requirements and preferences, frequent
product and service introductions embodying new technologies and the emergence
of new industry standards and practices that could render obsolete our existing
proprietary technology and systems. Our success will depend, in part, on our
ability to:
. develop or license leading technologies useful in our business;
. enhance our existing services;
. develop new services and technology that address the increasingly
sophisticated and varied needs of our existing and prospective clients;
and
. respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and
practices on a cost- effective and timely basis.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully implement new
technologies or adapt our proprietary technology and transaction-processing
systems to customer requirements or emerging industry standards. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to respond in a timely manner to changing
market conditions or customer requirements, and a failure to so respond could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
operating results.
We have decided not to participate in the development of the next set of
upgrades to the a/c/e system, which means that we will not use those upgrades.
We cannot assure you that our decision will not materially delay the
implementation of technical upgrades necessary for the a/c/e system to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For more information on our decision not to
participate in the development of system upgrades, see "--Our Decision Not to
Fund the Development of Certain Upgrades to the a/c/e System Could
Significantly Harm Our Electronic Trading Operations."
Declines in the Global Financial Markets May Materially Adversely Affect Our
Business
Adverse economic and political conditions may cause declines in global
financial markets and may affect our operating results. The global financial
services business is, by its nature, risky and volatile and is directly
28
affected by many national and international factors that are beyond our
control. Any one of these factors may cause a substantial decline in the U.S.
and global financial services markets, resulting in reduced trading volume.
These events could materially adversely affect our business. These factors
include:
. economic and political conditions in the United States and elsewhere in
the world;
. wavering institutional/consumer confidence levels;
. the availability of cash for investment by mutual funds and other
wholesale and retail investors; and
. legislative and regulatory changes.
In particular, U.S. Treasury bond futures and options contracts comprised
about 39% of our financial product volume and about 29% of our total
transaction volume for the first half of 2001. Further reductions in the amount
of U.S. Treasury bonds outstanding or adverse changes in investors' preferences
for futures contracts on fixed income obligations issued or backed by the U.S.
Government, including increased demand by investors in fixed income obligations
with shorter-term maturities, may adversely effect our business, financial
condition and operating results.
Strategic Alliances May Not Generate Increased Trading in Our Electronic
Marketplaces
We currently believe that strategic alliances will play an important role in
our long-term success. For example, we believe that our alliance with the Eurex
Group will enable us to offer a wider portfolio of products, expand into cash
markets and increase customer reach by obtaining access to our strategic
partners' distribution network and allowing us to offer products to the
strategic partners' customers. We cannot assure you that our alliance with the
Eurex Group or any other alliance of ours will generate the increased trading
volumes we are seeking.
Through our alliance with the Eurex Group or otherwise, we may seek to enter
into alliances or other arrangements with other parties. However, we cannot
provide you any assurances as to our success in this regard. To the extent that
we do enter into alliances or other arrangements, some of these alliances may
be intended to generate increased trading volume at the CBOT, and in other
cases, alliances may provide operating services to exchange clients in exchange
for a fee. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in either
developing, or fulfilling the objectives of, any such alliance. Our
participation in these alliances may strain our resources and may limit our
ability to pursue other strategic and business initiatives.
As part of our alliance with the Eurex Group, the parties have agreed to
move as quickly as possible to cause U.S. equity options to become available
for trading on the a/c/e system. To date, we have not identified an entity with
the appropriate regulatory approvals that is willing to participate in this
opportunity. As described above in "--Our Decision Not to Fund the Development
of Certain Upgrades to the a/c/e System Could Significantly Harm Our Electronic
Trading Operations," those discussions have commenced, but no assurance can be
made about whether, when or how this issue will be resolved.
Our Business is Subject to Risks Related to our Real Estate Holdings
Revenue from our building services operations represented about 11% of our
operating revenue for the first six months of 2001. Lower occupancy rates,
market rental rates and non-renewal of leases by tenants could have a material
adverse effect on our future business services revenue, overall financial
condition and operating results. Any decrease in leased space from our six
largest tenants could also affect future building service revenue if there is
no corresponding demand for the vacated office space. Furthermore, most of our
tenants are engaged in businesses that are directly or indirectly related to
the brokerage/trading industry or related areas of financial services and
adverse business conditions affecting those businesses could have a material
adverse effect on our occupancy rates and building services revenues.
29
Risks Relating to Regulation and Litigation
We are subject to the following risks in connection with the regulation of,
and litigation relating to, our business.
We May Not Be Able to Maintain Our Self-Regulatory Responsibilities
Some financial services regulators have publicly stated their concerns about
the ability of a financial exchange, organized as a for-profit corporation, to
adequately discharge its self-regulatory responsibilities. Our regulatory
programs and capabilities contribute significantly to our brand name and
reputation. Although we believe that we will be permitted to maintain these
responsibilities, we cannot assure you that we will not be required to modify
or restructure our regulatory functions in order to address these or other
concerns. Any such modifications or restructuring of our regulatory functions
could entail material costs, which we have not currently planned for.
We Are Subject to Significant Risks of Litigation
Many aspects of our business involve substantial risks of liability.
Dissatisfied customers frequently make claims regarding quality of trade
execution, improperly settled trades, mismanagement or even fraud against their
service providers. We may become subject to these claims as the result of
failures or malfunctions of systems and services provided by us. We could incur
significant legal expenses defending claims, even those without merit. Although
the Commodity Exchange Act and our CFTC-approved disclaimer and limitation of
liability rules offer us some protections, an adverse resolution of any
lawsuits or claims against us could have a material adverse effect on our
reputation, business, financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to litigation in which the plaintiffs are seeking significant
monetary recovery from the CBOT. See "Our Business--Legal Proceedings--Patent
Rights Litigations" and "--Soybean Antitrust Litigation." We cannot assure you
that we will be successful in defending these matters and any resulting
judgment could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition. In
addition, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims as a result of the
restructuring transactions. See "Our Business--Legal Proceedings--Minority
Member Litigation" and "--Chicago Board Options Exchange Dispute."
Any Infringement by Us on Patent Rights of Others Could Result in Litigation
and Could Materially Adversely Affect Our Operations
Our competitors as well as other companies and individuals may obtain, and
may be expected to obtain in the future, patents that concern products or
services related to the types of products and services we offer or plan to
offer. We cannot assure you that we are or will be aware of all patents
containing claims that may pose a risk of infringement by our products,
services or technologies. In general, if one or more of our products, services
or technologies were to infringe patents held by others, we may be required to
stop developing or marketing the products, services or technologies, to obtain
licenses to develop and market the services from the holders of the patents or
to redesign the products, services or technologies in such a way as to avoid
infringing on the patent claims. If we were unable to obtain these licenses, we
may not be able to redesign our products, services or technologies to avoid
infringement, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and operating results.
In particular, we have been named as a defendant in a lawsuit that alleges
that we have infringed a U.S. patent entitled "Automated Futures Trading
Exchange." If the plaintiffs are successful in this litigation, we may be
required to obtain a license to develop, market and use our electronic trading
systems, to cease developing, marketing or using those systems, or to redesign
such systems to avoid patent infringement. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to obtain such a license or that we would be able to obtain it at
commercially reasonable rates. Alternatively, to the extent we cannot obtain
such a license, we may be required to redesign our electronic trading systems.
As a result, if we are unsuccessful in defending this litigation, our business,
including our ability to implement our electronic trading strategies, could be
adversely affected. For more information, see "Our Business--Legal
Proceedings--Patent Rights Litigation."
30
Misconduct Could Harm Us and is Difficult to Detect
Although we perform significant self-regulatory functions, there have been a
number of highly publicized cases involving fraud or other misconduct in the
futures industry in recent years. We run the risk that the Class B members of
the CBOT subsidiary and other persons who use our markets will engage in fraud
or other misconduct, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious
reputational harm. It is not always possible to deter misconduct, and the
precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in
all cases.
The Existing Legal Framework for Our Industry Has Been Modified to Lower
Barriers to Entry and Decrease Continuing Regulatory Costs for Competitors
Our industry has been subject to several fundamental regulatory changes,
including changes in the statute under which we have operated since 1974. The
Commodity Exchange Act generally required all futures contracts to be executed
on an exchange that has been approved by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission. The exchange trading requirement was modified by CFTC regulations
to permit privately negotiated swap contracts to be transacted in the over-the-
counter market. The CFTC exemption under which the over-the-counter derivative
market operated precluded the over-the-counter market from avoiding CFTC
regulation for exchange-like electronic transaction systems and clearing. These
regulatory restrictions on the over-the-counter market were repealed by the
Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000. It is possible that the chief
beneficiaries of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act will be over-the-
counter dealers and competitors that operate or intend to open electronic
trading facilities or to conduct their futures business directly among
themselves on a bilateral basis. The customers who may access such electronic
exchanges or engage in such bilateral private transactions are the same
customers who conduct the vast majority of their financial business on
regulated exchanges. The Commodity Futures Modernization Act also permits
banks, broker-dealers and some of their affiliates to engage in foreign
exchange futures transactions for or with retail customers without being
subjected to regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act.
In the future, our industry may become subject to new regulations or changes
in the interpretation or enforcement of existing regulations. We cannot predict
the extent to which any future regulatory changes may adversely affect our
business. For more information about potential changes in our regulatory
environment, see "Our Business--Regulation--Changes in Existing Laws and
Rules."
Risks Relating to Changes in Our Corporate Governance Structure
The following risks relate to changes to our corporate governance structure
that will occur as part of the restructuring transactions.
Substantial Elimination of the Petition Process and Other Changes to Our
Corporate Governance Structure Will Significantly Reduce the Influence of the
Members in the Management of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT Subsidiary
As a result of completion of the restructuring transactions, our members
will have substantially less authority to control the day-to-day management and
operations of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary. Following completion of
the restructuring transactions, the holders of the common stock of CBOT
Holdings will have the right to vote on all matters upon which the stockholders
of CBOT Holdings are entitled to vote generally, including among other things,
the election of directors to the board of directors of CBOT Holdings. However,
the holders of the common stock of CBOT Holdings will not be entitled to
initiate proposals to amend the certificate of incorporation of CBOT Holdings
or, as described below, the certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and
regulations of the CBOT subsidiary. Any proposal by stockholders of CBOT
Holdings to amend the bylaws of CBOT Holdings may only be brought to a vote at
an annual meeting in accordance with the bylaws of CBOT Holdings, which will
generally require advance notice of any proposal not less than 30, nor more
than 75, days in advance of the first anniversary of the mailing of proxy
materials for the preceding year's annual meeting. Any stockholder proposal to
adopt, repeal or amend the bylaws will
31
require the approval of two-thirds of the voting power of the stockholders of
CBOT Holdings entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. In
addition, stockholders will not have authority to call special meetings of
stockholders or take action by written consent of stockholders.
CBOT Holdings, as the holder of the sole Class A membership in the CBOT
subsidiary, will have the exclusive right to vote on most matters requiring a
vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, including among other things, the
election of directors to the board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary. The
holders of Class B and Class C memberships will not have voting rights with
respect to matters requiring a vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary,
except that holders of Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships will have
limited voting rights to approve changes that would adversely affect certain
core rights relating to the trading rights and privileges of Class B
memberships. This means that the holders of Class B and Class C memberships
will generally not have the authority to adopt, repeal or amend the certificate
of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary.
Collectively, these changes will significantly reduce the influence of our
members and may lead to decisions and outcomes that differ from those made
under our current certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and
regulations. This significant reduction in the ability of our members to
participate in the day-to-day management and operations of CBOT Holdings and
the CBOT subsidiary may make our organization less attractive to our current
members. As a result, they may seek to conduct their business at, or obtain
membership in, one or more other exchanges. A loss or material diminution of
member trading activity could negatively impact liquidity and trading volumes
in our products. A material reduction in the aggregate capital provided by our
clearing members to guarantee trades by them and their customers could lead to
a reduction in trading activity on our exchange, and make it more difficult for
us to generate revenue or to sustain growth.
Changes in Our Corporate Governance Structure Will Eliminate Many Member-
Dominated Committees Which Will Significantly Limit the Influence of the
Members in the Management of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT Subsidiary
Our current governance structure grants significant decision-making
authority to various member-dominated committees, which we believe
significantly reduces our ability to make strategic or executive decisions in a
timely or efficient manner. It is currently expected that, subject to any
applicable regulatory requirements, we will eliminate many of these committees
in connection with the restructuring transactions. After completion of the
restructuring transactions, our management and the management of the CBOT
subsidiary will be given significant decision-making responsibilities,
including with respect to matters currently addressed by such member-dominated
committees, as well as the requisite authority to make such decisions. We
currently expect that management of CBOT Holdings will make decisions in a
manner intended to enhance stockholder value over the long term, which may lead
to decisions or outcomes that differ from the decisions and outcomes that are
made by our current board of directors and committees under our current
governance structure.
Delaware Law May Protect Decisions of the Board of Directors That Have
Different Effects on the Holders of Class A, Class B and Class C Memberships of
the CBOT Subsidiary
In the context of stock corporations, Delaware law generally provides that a
board of directors owes an equal duty to all stockholders, regardless of class
or series, and does not provide separate or additional duties to any particular
group of stockholders. As a nonstock corporation with multiple classes of
memberships, the board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary may have similar
obligations to each class of membership. Moreover, the certificate of
incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary will include unique provisions that are
intended to protect certain core rights associated with the trading rights and
privileges of Class B members, including, among other things, a commitment to
maintain current open outcry markets so long as each such market is deemed
liquid under the terms of the certificate of incorporation unless the
discontinuance of any such market is approved by the Series B-1 and Series B-2,
Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary. Such provisions may have the effect of
requiring the board of directors to make certain decisions that would benefit
one or more series of Class B members but not the Class A member or Class C
members, or which would affect the Class C members, the Class A member and one
or more series of Class B members differently.
32
More generally, the board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary may make
decisions that may have the effect of benefitting one class of membership over
the other, or which affect the holders of each class or series of membership
differently. Delaware law will generally protect these decisions so long as the
board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary acts in a disinterested, informed
manner with respect to these decisions, in good faith and in the belief that it
is acting in the best interests of the corporation and its members generally.
Effects of Certain Provisions Could Enable the Board of Directors of CBOT
Holdings to Prevent or Delay a Change of Control
Some of the provisions of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of
CBOT Holdings, as well as a stockholder rights plan of CBOT Holdings, if
adopted, could, together or separately:
. discourage potential acquisition proposals;
. delay or prevent a change in control; or
. limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for
shares of the common stock of CBOT Holdings.
CBOT Holdings' certificate of incorporation and bylaws will provide, among
other things, that stockholders may not take action by written consent and that
special meetings of stockholders may only be called by the chairman, the
president or the board. In addition, following completion of the restructuring
transactions, the board of CBOT Holdings will be able to issue up to 10,000,000
shares of preferred stock with rights and privileges that might be senior to
issued common stock without stockholder approval. Furthermore, we currently
anticipate that the board of CBOT Holdings would likely be asked to consider,
and may adopt, a stockholder rights plan in connection with an underwritten
public offering of its common stock, if any. These provisions could prevent or
delay a change of control or could limit the price some investors might be
willing to pay in the future for shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings.
Our board believes that these provisions will protect stockholders over the
long term and ensure that stockholders receive fair compensation for their
shares in the event of an unsolicited takeover attempt. Our board believes that
provisions substantially similar to those that will be applicable to CBOT
Holdings have been widely adopted by public companies.
Following the completion of the restructuring transactions, a change of
control of the CBOT subsidiary could not occur without the consent of CBOT
Holdings as the holder of the sole Class A membership.
Issuance of Additional Shares of Capital Stock Will Dilute the Value of the
Shares We Issue to You
CBOT Holdings will have a significant number of authorized but unissued
shares of common stock that may be issued in the future at the discretion of
its board of directors, without stockholder approval. The board of directors of
CBOT Holdings may also issue newly created series of preferred stock which may
be convertible into other shares of CBOT Holdings, including shares of common
stock, without stockholder approval. In particular, following completion of the
restructuring transactions, the board of directors of CBOT Holdings will have
available for issuance over 60,000,000 shares of common stock and up to a total
of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. In addition, we currently expect to
adopt a long-term equity incentive plan under which stock-based awards may be
made to employees and directors of CBOT Holdings and its subsidiaries,
including the CBOT subsidiary, and certain other persons. If additional shares
of common stock are issued in connection with future acquisitions, the
incentive plan or for any other purpose, your equity interest in CBOT Holdings
will be diluted and the market price or value of your shares, if any, could
decline. The board of directors of CBOT Holdings is expected to consider the
potential dilutive effects of any subsequent issuance of common stock, or
securities convertible into shares of common stock, in relation to the value
generated or expected to be generated in connection with their issuance.
However, we cannot assure you that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings will
not authorize the issuance of additional shares of common stock, preferred
stock or securities convertible into shares of common stock, in the future.
33
THE RESTRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS
Overview
As a result of rapidly evolving changes in the futures industry, principally
the increasing importance of electronic trading, we have determined that it is
necessary to restructure our organization in order to enhance its
competitiveness. Over the last several years, with the assistance of various
outside advisors, we have conducted an ongoing and extensive evaluation process
with respect to our need to restructure. As a result of this process, we have
developed, and are proposing for your approval, a series of transactions
designed to restructure the CBOT.
The restructuring transactions are designed to demutualize our organization
by creating a stock, for-profit holding company, CBOT Holdings, and
distributing shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings to our members while
maintaining the CBOT as a nonstock subsidiary of CBOT Holdings, modernize our
corporate governance structure in order to improve its corporate decision-
making process and reorganize and consolidate our electronic trading business
into our eCBOT subsidiary. We believe that the completion of the restructuring
transactions will enable us to enhance our competitiveness within the futures
industry, including both the open outcry and electronic trading markets.
We currently anticipate that we will complete the restructuring transactions
as soon as reasonably practicable following membership approval of the
restructuring transactions, subject to receiving a favorable ruling from the
Internal Revenue Service and/or opinion of counsel, and any required regulatory
approvals from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. However, our
obligation to complete the restructuring transactions is subject to
satisfaction of a number of conditions, including, among other things, a
condition that our board of directors shall not have determined that the
restructuring transactions are no longer in the best interests of the CBOT and
its members or are not fair to each class of CBOT membership. For more
information about the IRS ruling and opinion of counsel, CFTC approvals and
other conditions to our obligation to complete the restructuring transactions,
see "--Regulatory Matters" and "--Conditions to Completing the Restructuring
Transactions."
Background of the Restructuring Transactions
Development of the Restructuring Strategy
We were organized in 1848 as a voluntary, unincorporated association to
serve as an open outcry marketplace for the growing agricultural market in
Chicago. In 1859, the Illinois General Assembly, by legislative act, granted us
a special charter that incorporated our organization. In August 2000, we
reincorporated in Delaware, and we currently exist as a Delaware nonstock, not-
for-profit corporation.
Now in our 153rd year of operation, we have become a leader in the domestic
listed derivatives market. According to industry data provided by the Futures
Industry Institute, in the first half of 2001, we had about a 9% share of the
global listed futures, options on futures and equity index market. According to
industry data provided by the Futures Industry Association, we ranked third
worldwide among futures exchanges in volume of contracts traded in the first
half of 2001, transacting about 42% of the global listed agricultural futures
and options contracts, e.g., wheat, corn, soybeans, and about 16% of the global
listed financial futures and options contracts, e.g., U.S. Treasury bonds and
notes. In addition, as the "Chicago Board of Trade," we believe that we have
one of the strongest brand names in the futures industry.
Competitive conditions in the futures industry have changed significantly in
the last decade due to innovations in the computer and communications
industries. As a result, maintaining our competitive position has become
increasingly challenging. To meet the challenges and opportunities associated
with the increasing importance of electronic trading, in 1992 we began to make
our products available for electronic trading, initially, on the Globex system,
and, beginning in 1994, on the Project A electronic trading system, which was
operated by the electronic trading division of Ceres until August 25, 2000. On
August 27, 2000, Ceres, through
34
its participation in an alliance with the Eurex Group, began to operate the
a/c/e electronic trading system, which allows CBOT and Eurex members to access
their respective markets from a common front end. As of June 30, 2001, total
volume traded on the a/c/e/ system surpassed an aggregate of about 30.2 million
contracts traded since it became operational.
Notwithstanding the success of the Globex system, Project A and other
electronic trading initiatives, the Strategy Committee of our board of
directors concluded in early 1999 that changes to our organizational structure
were desirable in order to respond to the increasingly competitive challenges
presented by electronic trading as well as other exchanges. This conclusion was
adopted in a strategic plan approved by our board of directors in August 1999.
In addition, in July 1999, our board of directors established a
Restructuring Task Force, composed of directors and non-director members of the
CBOT. The Restructuring Task Force was charged with developing a restructuring
strategy designed to modernize our organizational structure and a corporate
governance mechanism designed to position us to compete more effectively in the
evolving marketplace.
Over the following six months, the Restructuring Task Force conducted an
extensive strategic analysis, assisted by the management of the CBOT, A.T.
Kearney, Inc., a management consulting firm, Merrill Lynch & Co., an investment
banking firm, Kirkland & Ellis, as legal counsel to the CBOT and the board of
directors, and Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, as special legal counsel to the
Restructuring Task Force.
As part of this strategic analysis, the Restructuring Task Force, together
with its advisors, reviewed our business, including our organizational and
corporate governance structures, and current industry trends and practices. The
findings of the Restructuring Task Force formed the basis for a recommendation
to our board of directors, which included objectives for a restructuring
strategy and a detailed business outline, including alternative organizational
structures.
In January 2000, our board of directors approved a general restructuring
strategy recommended by the Restructuring Task Force, subject to the board of
directors' further review, consideration and approval of the definitive terms
and structure of the transactions designed to implement the strategy, which had
not yet been formulated. The restructuring strategy generally contemplated the
restructuring of the CBOT into two separate for-profit companies, one
conducting the CBOT's open outcry business and the other conducting the CBOT's
electronic trading business, and the distribution of shares of stock in both
companies to the current CBOT members. The strategy also contemplated the
possibility that the then proposed electronic trading company might conduct an
offering of shares of its stock to the public at or around the time of its
separation from the open outcry company.
In addition, our board of directors at such time appointed two special
committees of the board. One, the Implementation Committee, initially consisted
of nine members of the board of directors and was chaired by the then current
chairman of our board, David P. Brennan. The other members of the
Implementation Committee were Charles P. Carey, Andrew J. Filipowski, Harold W.
Lavender, Peter C. Lee, Veda Kaufman Levin, James P. McMillin, Joseph Niciforo
and Michael P. Ryan. The Implementation Committee was directed to develop and
recommend for the board's further review, consideration and approval the
definitive terms and structure of the transactions designed to implement the
restructuring strategy.
The other special committee, the Independent Allocation Committee, was
composed solely of outside or non-member directors of the board and was chaired
by former Illinois Governor James R. Thompson, the Chairman of the law firm,
Winston & Strawn. The other members of the Independent Allocation Committee
were Dr. Robert S. Hamada, the Dean and Edward Eagle Branch Distinguished
Service Professor of Finance at the University of Chicago Graduate School of
Business, Robert H. Michel, a former Republican leader of the U.S. House of
Representatives and Senior Advisor at the law firm of Hogan & Hartson, and
Ralph H. Weems, an independent farmer and former president of the American
Soybean Association. Dr. Hamada and Mr. Michel ceased to serve on the
Independent Allocation Committee effective January 1, 2001, concurrent with the
35
expiration of their terms as directors of the CBOT. Since no mechanism
currently exists in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws or rules and
regulations for allocating ownership in our organization among members in
connection with a restructuring such as the one contemplated by the board, the
Independent Allocation Committee was directed to develop and recommend for the
board's further review, consideration and approval an appropriate and fair
allocation of value among the members of CBOT in connection with the
transactions to implement the restructuring strategy, including the allocation
to CBOT members of shares of stock of the then proposed open outcry trading and
electronic trading companies.
The Implementation Committee continued the work of the Restructuring Task
Force with assistance from the management of the CBOT and its outside advisors,
including A.T. Kearney, Merrill Lynch, Kirkland & Ellis and Piper Marbury
Rudnick & Wolfe. In particular, the Implementation Committee worked to develop
the definitive terms and structure of transactions designed to effectuate the
restructuring strategy, including a preliminary step necessary in order to
proceed with the implementation of the restructuring strategy. This step
involved the reincorporation of the CBOT in Delaware as a nonstock, not-for-
profit corporation and was designed to cause the CBOT to be governed under a
more modern and well developed legal framework so that the CBOT could more
effectively accomplish its purposes. Among other things, unlike the law of
Illinois then applicable to the CBOT, Delaware law provided the CBOT a more
direct procedure pursuant to which it could change its status from that of a
nonstock, not-for-profit corporation to that of a stock, for-profit
corporation.
In addition to developing the terms of the transactions required to
implement the reincorporation of the CBOT in Delaware, the Implementation
Committee further refined and developed the original restructuring strategy.
Concurrently, the Independent Allocation Committee, together with its advisors,
which included the law firm of Winston & Strawn, as its special counsel, and
the investment banking firm of William Blair & Company, L.L.C., as its
financial advisor, worked to develop a recommended methodology for an
appropriate and fair allocation of equity among the CBOT members in connection
with implementation of the original restructuring strategy. For more
information about the work of the Independent Allocation Committee, see "--
Independent Allocation Committee of the Board." In addition, Arthur Andersen
LLP was retained by us to prepare a valuation analysis of Ceres and the limited
partnership interests.
In early May 2000, the Independent Allocation Committee submitted to our
board of directors its initial report, which recommended an allocation of
equity among the members in connection with the implementation of the original
restructuring strategy. Also in May 2000, our board of directors received a
report prepared by the Implementation Committee, which provided additional
information regarding, and refined certain aspects of, the original
restructuring strategy. This report also contained a detailed description of
the transactions required in order to implement the Delaware reincorporation
and recommended that the Delaware reincorporation be approved and submitted to
the CBOT membership for its approval.
At its May 16, 2000 meeting, our board of directors approved the
transactions necessary to effect the Delaware reincorporation and directed that
such transactions be submitted to the CBOT membership for a ballot vote.
Following member approval, the reincorporation of the CBOT in Delaware as a
nonstock, not-for-profit corporation was completed in August 2000. Shortly
thereafter, we formed eCBOT as a wholly owned subsidiary of the CBOT for the
purpose of later reorganizing our electronic trading business. The CBOT
assigned its general and limited partnership interests in Ceres to eCBOT in
September 2000.
At the same May 2000 meeting, our board of directors also approved and
adopted the report of the Independent Allocation Committee, including its
recommendation regarding the methodology to be used with respect to the
allocation of shares of stock of the then proposed open outcry trading and
electronic trading companies among the holders of Full, Associate, GIM, IDEM
and COM Memberships in the CBOT, subject to any changes in the factors
underlying the assumptions that were used or reviewed in the preparation of the
Independent Allocation Committee report and taking into account any adjustments
to such allocation resulting from the terms of the reorganization of our
electronic trading business, and further subject to the board's further review,
consideration and approval of transactions necessary to implement the
restructuring strategy. At this time, William Blair, as financial advisor to
the Independent Allocation Committee, delivered its opinion to the
36
Independent Allocation Committee and the board of directors that, based upon
and subject to the matters set forth in the opinion, the allocation of shares
of common stock in the then proposed open outcry trading and electronic trading
companies in the ratio of 5.0 : 1.0 : 0.5 : 0.06 : 0.07 to each Full Member and
Associate Member, and each holder of a GIM, IDEM and COM, respectively, was
fair, from a financial point of view, to each of the five classes of members.
For more information about the allocation recommendation, see "--Independent
Allocation Committee of the Board" and "--Opinion of the Financial Advisor to
the Independent Allocation Committee of the Board." At this time, Arthur
Andersen provided its report to the board regarding its preliminary valuation
analysis of Ceres as of May 16, 2000.
The board of directors also approved at this meeting the report of the
Implementation Committee as a description of the restructuring strategy as it
was then envisioned by the board of directors, subject to any changes in the
factors underlying the assumptions that were used or reviewed in the
preparation of the report, and subject to the board's further review,
consideration and approval of the transactions necessary to implement the
restructuring strategy.
Following the May board meeting, the management of the CBOT, with the
assistance of its outside advisors, primarily consisting of Merrill Lynch,
Kirkland & Ellis and Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, a management consulting firm,
conducted an evaluation process with respect to the implementation of the
original restructuring strategy and worked to develop detailed business plans
for the then proposed open outcry trading and electronic trading companies
envisioned by the original restructuring strategy.
Based upon this evaluation process and further analysis, management of the
CBOT and the Executive Committee of our board of directors concluded that the
original restructuring strategy should be substantially revised in light of a
number of factors, including, among other things, increasing competitive
pressures in the industry, the adverse changes in the capital markets, further
review and analysis regarding the implementation and execution of the separate
business plans of the then proposed open outcry trading and electronic trading
companies, the overall financial status of the CBOT and the need for the CBOT
to demutualize as quickly as possible so that it could enhance its competitive
posture and improve its decision-making capability.
On August 31, 2000, management of the CBOT and the Executive Committee
recommended to the board of directors that the original restructuring strategy
be abandoned in favor of a substantially revised restructuring strategy. After
careful consideration of the matters discussed and presented, the board of
directors approved a revised restructuring strategy, which involved
demutualizing the CBOT but not restructuring the CBOT into two separate,
competing companies. Specifically, the revised strategy contemplated the
following:
. converting the CBOT into a single Delaware stock, for-profit corporation,
which would be focused on updated open outcry trading with enhanced
technology, and distributing shares of common stock in such stock, for-
profit company, representing both trading rights and privileges and
equity ownership, to the current members;
. adopting a revised corporate governance structure, which would include
substantially eliminating the membership petition process, streamlining
the board of directors and making certain other changes to implement a
more efficient decision-making process for the company; and
. reorganizing and consolidating the CBOT's electronic trading business,
part of which is currently operated by Ceres, into eCBOT, which would be
operated as a wholly owned subsidiary of the for-profit company.
At this time, the board of directors determined that the original two-
company strategy should be abandoned and that a simple demutualization plan
involving the conversion of the CBOT into a single stock, for-profit company
should be pursued instead. The board concluded that the revised strategy would
enable each of the two businesses to be operated independently and in a more
competitive manner but under a common ownership structure that would allow
substantial sharing of resources and infrastructure.
The board's approval of the revised strategy was subject to its further
review, consideration and approval of the definitive terms and structure of
transactions designed to implement the revised restructuring strategy,
including an appropriate and fair allocation of value in the then proposed
stock, for-profit company among the
37
CBOT members. On August 31, 2000, our board directed the Executive Committee
and the management of the CBOT to develop and recommend for its further review
and consideration the definitive terms and structure of transactions designed
to implement this revised restructuring strategy.
Following the August board meeting, management and the Executive Committee,
with the assistance of the CBOT's advisors, primarily consisting of Merrill
Lynch and Kirkland & Ellis, worked to develop the terms and structure of
transactions designed to implement the revised restructuring strategy. In
addition, Arthur Andersen was retained by us and our eCBOT subsidiary to
prepare an updated valuation analysis of Ceres and the limited partnership
interests in connection with the reorganization and consolidation of our
electronic trading business, which is currently operated by Ceres, into eCBOT.
Shortly thereafter, Arthur Andersen was also engaged to evaluate the fairness,
from a financial point of view, to Ceres and each class of its limited partners
of the consideration to be received by each limited partner in exchange for
their respective limited partnership interests pursuant to the Ceres merger as
described further below.
Concurrently, the Independent Allocation Committee undertook to update its
recommendation regarding an appropriate and fair allocation of value among CBOT
members in the context of the transactions to implement the revised
restructuring strategy. For more information about the allocation
recommendation and the additional work of the Independent Allocation Committee,
see "--Independent Allocation Committee of the Board."
On November 21, 2000, the Independent Allocation Committee reported on and
provided to our board of directors its updated recommendation regarding the
allocation among the members of equity in the then proposed stock, for-profit
company in respect of their memberships in connection with the restructuring
transactions. The Independent Allocation Committee recommended, in the context
of the restructuring transactions, that an allocation of value in the proposed
stock, for-profit company among members in respect of their memberships in
connection with the restructuring in the ratio of 5.00 : 1.00 : 0.50 : 0.06 :
0.07 to each Full Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM, respectively,
was fair. The Independent Allocation Committee indicated that, in reaching this
recommendation, it received and considered an updated opinion of William Blair
that the proposed allocation was fair, from a financial point of view, to each
of the five classes of members.
At the same meeting, Arthur Andersen reported to our board regarding its
updated valuation of Ceres and the limited partnership interests as of October
31, 2000. Arthur Andersen also reported that, subject to a review of the final
terms of the restructuring transactions, it was prepared to deliver its opinion
that the consideration to be received by each limited partner of Ceres in
exchange for their respective limited partnership interests pursuant to the
Ceres merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to Ceres and to each
class of the Ceres limited partners.
At the December 12, 2000 meeting of the board of directors, the then current
status of the restructuring transactions was reviewed and discussed. At this
meeting, management and the Executive Committee presented to the board of
directors a detailed update regarding the restructuring transactions. At this
meeting, the board received a report from management regarding the
restructuring transactions and the CBOT's business strategy. The board also
received a report from Kirkland & Ellis concerning certain legal matters
relating to the restructuring transactions.
In early January 2001, the Executive Committee met to consider certain
refinements to the restructuring transactions proposed by the new chairman of
the board of directors, who had been elected in December 2000 and assumed
office in January 2001. These refinements primarily related to the composition
of the board of directors of the then proposed stock, for-profit company, the
provisions to be included in the certificate of incorporation concerning
certain core rights associated with the trading rights and privileges of
certain common stockholders and clarifications regarding the importance of
considering the expected effects, if any, of the restructuring transactions on
the Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right in making any determination
that the restructuring transactions remain in the best interests of the CBOT
and its members.
At its briefing meeting on January 9, 2001, the board of directors received
a further update concerning the status of the restructuring transactions,
including the refinements recommended by the Executive Committee
38
and management. These matters were reviewed and discussed. Kirkland & Ellis
answered questions with respect to certain aspects of the restructuring
transactions.
On January 16, 2001, the Independent Allocation Committee, which, following
the expiration of the terms of Dr. Hamada and Mr. Michel as directors as of
January 1, 2001, was comprised of Governor Thompson and Mr. Weems, held a
meeting for the purpose of considering the refinements to the restructuring
transactions recommended by the Executive Committee and management. William
Blair and Winston & Strawn, as advisors to the Independent Allocation
Committee, participated in this meeting.
On January 16, 2001, immediately following the meeting of the Independent
Allocation Committee, a meeting of the board of directors was held for the
purpose of considering the restructuring transactions. At this meeting,
management and the Executive Committee presented to the board of directors for
its review and consideration the proposed restructuring transactions. The board
also received a report from the Executive Committee and management regarding
the restructuring transactions and the CBOT's business strategy, including,
among other things, the business purposes of the restructuring transactions.
The Independent Allocation Committee reported to the board of directors that it
had reviewed the refinements to the restructuring transactions recommended by
the Executive Committee and management and confirmed its updated recommendation
regarding the allocation among the members of equity in the then proposed
stock, for-profit company in respect of their memberships in connection with
the restructuring transactions, as provided to the board at the November 21,
2000 meeting. The Independent Allocation Committee indicated that, in reaching
this recommendation, it received and considered an updated opinion of William
Blair that the proposed allocation was fair, from a financial point of view, to
each of the five classes of members.
The board also received a report from Kirkland & Ellis concerning certain
legal matters relating to the restructuring transactions as well as an overview
of the terms and structure of the restructuring transactions. Kirkland & Ellis
answered questions with respect to certain aspects of the restructuring
transactions and provided an update regarding the then current status of
various litigation and other matters relating to the restructuring
transactions.
In addition, the board received an update from Arthur Andersen regarding its
valuation of Ceres and the limited partnership interests as of November 30,
2000. Merrill Lynch, financial advisor to the CBOT in connection with the
restructuring transactions, answered questions with respect to certain aspects
of the restructuring transactions, the capital markets generally, industry
trends and the competitive challenges currently facing the CBOT.
At this time, our board of directors approved and adopted the recommendation
of the Independent Allocation Committee regarding the allocation of equity in
the then proposed stock, for-profit company among the holders of Full,
Associate, GIM, IDEM and COM Memberships in the CBOT in respect of their
memberships in connection with the restructuring transactions, subject to any
changes in the factors underlying the assumptions that were used or reviewed in
the preparation of the Independent Allocation Committee updated report. In
connection therewith, William Blair, as financial advisor to the Independent
Allocation Committee, delivered its opinion to the Independent Allocation
Committee and the board of directors that, based upon and subject to the
matters set forth in the opinion, the allocation of equity in the then proposed
stock, for-profit company among members in respect of their memberships in
connection with the restructuring transactions in the ratio of 5.0 : 1.00 :
0.50 : 0.06 : 0.07 to each Full Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM,
respectively, was fair, from a financial point of view, to each of the five
classes of members. For more information regarding this opinion, see "--Opinion
of the Financial Advisor to the Independent Allocation Committee of the Board."
Also at this time, Arthur Andersen delivered its opinion to the board of
directors that, based on and subject to the matters set forth in the opinion,
the consideration to be received by each limited partner in exchange for their
respective limited partnership interests pursuant to the Ceres merger was fair,
from a financial point of view, to Ceres and each class of its limited
partners. For more information regarding this opinion, see "--Opinion of Arthur
Andersen to the Board of Directors Regarding the Fairness of the Ceres Merger."
39
After careful consideration of the matters discussed and presented at this
meeting, our board of directors determined that the restructuring transactions,
taken as a whole, including the allocation methodology to be utilized in the
demutualization for the allocation of shares in the then proposed stock, for-
profit company among the holders of Full, Associate, GIM, IDEM and COM
Memberships in the CBOT in respect of their memberships and the terms of the
Ceres merger, were in the best interests of CBOT and its members and fair to
all classes of CBOT members. Accordingly, our board approved and authorized the
restructuring transactions and determined to recommend to the membership of the
CBOT that they vote to approve the restructuring transactions. In connection
with such approval, two directors who were Associate Members voted in favor of
the restructuring transactions, but indicated orally at the board meeting their
intention to deliver to the Secretary of the CBOT written statements with
respect to certain reservations regarding the proposed allocation of value in
the then proposed stock, for-profit company. To date, the secretary of the CBOT
has not received any such written statements.
The board's approval of the restructuring transactions was subject to its
determination, at the time of the mailing of the proxy statement and prospectus
relating to the restructuring transactions, that the restructuring transactions
remain in the best interests of the CBOT and its members and remain fair to all
classes of CBOT members. For more information, see "--Conditions to Completing
the Restructuring Transactions."
Following the January board meeting, management and the Executive Committee,
with the assistance of Kirkland & Ellis, worked to refine the terms and
structure of the transactions designed to implement the revised restructuring
strategy. Throughout this process, management and the Executive Committee
continued to review the restructuring transactions to determine whether such
transactions continued to best achieve the organization's objectives with
respect to the revised restructuring strategy, and whether the restructuring
transactions offered the optimal organizational structure in light of further
changes in competitive pressures in the industry, the continued adverse
condition of the capital markets and the refinement of the CBOT's long-term
strategic objectives.
As a result of this review, management of the CBOT and the Executive
Committee of our board of directors determined that the board of directors
should adopt certain refinements to the restructuring transactions, which are
designed, in part, to provide the CBOT additional structural flexibility while
retaining certain benefits associated with nonstock membership corporations in
a manner that is consistent with the objectives of the revised restructuring
strategy, including, among other things, refinements designed to demutualize
the CBOT by creating a stock, for-profit holding company, CBOT Holdings, and
distributing shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings to the current CBOT
members, while maintaining the CBOT as a nonstock corporate subsidiary of CBOT
Holdings.
On September 13, 2001, the Independent Allocation Committee held a meeting
at which the members of the committee received an update from each of William
Blair, Winston & Strawn and Kirkland & Ellis relating to the refinements to the
restructuring transactions. On September 24, 2001, the Independent Allocation
Committee held another meeting for the purpose of considering the refinements
to the restructuring transactions recommended by management and the Executive
Committee. William Blair and Winston & Strawn, as advisors to the Independent
Allocation Committee, participated in the meeting.
On September 24, 2001, at a special meeting of the board of directors,
management of the CBOT and the Executive Committee recommended that the board
of directors adopt and approve the refinements to the restructuring
transactions, which are designed, in part, to implement a holding company
structure. Specifically as modified by the proposed refinements, the
restructuring transactions contemplate the following:
. demutualizing the CBOT by creating a stock, for-profit holding company,
CBOT Holdings, and distributing shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings
to our members, while maintaining the CBOT as a nonstock subsidiary of
CBOT Holdings;
. adopting a revised corporate governance structure, which would include
substantially eliminating the membership petition process, adopting a
more modern mechanism for initiating and voting on stockholder proposals
and making certain other changes to improve the CBOT's corporate
decision-making process; and
40
. reorganizing and consolidating the CBOT's electronic trading business,
part of which is currently operated by Ceres, into eCBOT, which would be
operated as a wholly owned subsidiary of the CBOT subsidiary.
In connection with this recommendation, the board of directors received a
report from Kirkland & Ellis concerning certain legal matters relating to the
refinements to the restructuring transactions as well as an overview of the
terms and structure of the restructuring transactions, as modified by the
refinements recommended by management and the Executive Committee and a
preliminary draft of an amendment to the registration statement marked to show
changes necessary to implement such refinements.
In addition, Kirkland and Ellis made a presentation to the board of
directors regarding certain legal issues relating to the proposed refinements
to the restructuring transactions. These matters were reviewed and discussed.
Kirkland & Ellis answered questions with respect to certain aspects of the
restructuring transactions.
After careful consideration of the matters discussed and presented at this
meeting, our board of directors determined that it would be in the best
interest of the CBOT and its members to postpone the board's vote on the
proposed refinements to the restructuring transactions in order to provide the
directors with additional time to more carefully review and consider the
proposed refinements. Accordingly, a special meeting of the board was scheduled
for October 2, 2001.
On October 2, 2001, at a special meeting of the board, the Independent
Allocation Committee of the board reported on its resolution confirming as fair
the allocation of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings among the members in
connection with the restructuring transactions as modified by the proposed
refinements after receiving and considering an updated opinion of its financial
advisor, William Blair, that the allocation of shares of common stock of CBOT
Holdings among the members in connection with the restructuring transactions as
modified by the proposed refinements is fair, from a financial point of view,
to each of the five classes of members. In connection with the Independent
Allocation Committee's recommendation, William Blair delivered its opinion,
dated as of September 24, 2001, to the effect that the allocation of shares of
common stock of CBOT Holdings among the members in respect of their memberships
in connection with the restructuring transactions as modified by the proposed
refinements is fair, from a financial point of view, to each of the five
classes of members.
At the same meeting of the board of directors, Arthur Anderson reported
regarding, and delivered to the board of directors of the CBOT and eCBOT, (i) a
valuation of Ceres and the limited partnership interests of Ceres as of June
30, 2001, and (ii) its opinion, dated as of October 2, 2001, to the effect that
the distributions of cash payments to each of the limited partners of Ceres in
exchange for their respective limited partnership interest as merger
consideration pursuant to the Ceres merger, as proposed in connection with the
restructuring transactions, as modified by the proposed refinements, is fair,
from a financial point of view, to Ceres and each class of the limited partners
of Ceres. For more information regarding this opinion, see "--Opinion of Arthur
Andersen to the Board of Directors Regarding the Fairness of the Ceres Merger."
In addition, the board of directors reviewed and discussed the proposed
refinements to the restructuring transactions as set forth in the registration
statement and in a report prepared by Kirkland & Ellis, which had previously
been distributed to the board in connection with the special meeting of the
board of directors on September 24, 2001, concerning certain legal matters
relating to the restructuring transactions as well as an overview of the terms
and structure of the restructuring transactions as modified by the proposed
refinements. Kirkland & Ellis answered questions with respect to certain
aspects of the proposed refinements and with respect to the restructuring
transactions generally.
After careful consideration of the matters discussed and presented, the
board of directors determined that the refinements to the restructuring
transactions, taken as a whole, are advisable, desirable and in the best
interests of the CBOT and its members and are fair to all classes of CBOT
members, and approved and
41
authorized the refinements to the restructuring transactions, including, among
other things, refinements designed to demutualize the CBOT by creating a stock,
for-profit holding company, CBOT Holdings, and distributing shares of common
stock of CBOT Holdings to the current CBOT members, while maintaining the CBOT
as a nonstock corporate subsidiary of CBOT Holdings.
The board's approval of the refinements to the restructuring transactions
was subject to its determination, at the time of the mailing of the proxy
statement and prospectus relating to the restructuring transactions, that the
refinements to the restructuring transactions remain in the best interests of
the CBOT and its members and remain fair to all classes of CBOT members. For
more information, see "--Conditions to Completing the Restructuring
Transactions."
Reasons for the Restructuring Strategy
Our restructuring strategy is designed to respond to significant competitive
challenges currently faced by the CBOT and to enhance the long-term value of
CBOT for its members. Current industry trends, including increased electronic
trading of derivative securities, may threaten the long-term viability of
traditional open outcry exchanges, including the CBOT. In fact, as reported by
Futures Industry Magazine, in 1999, Eurex, an electronic derivatives exchange,
overtook the CBOT to become the world's largest derivatives exchange based on
contract volume. We believe that these industry trends are related, in large
part, to shifting priorities of investors and members of exchanges, rapid
advances in technology and electronic trading and the realignment of key
industry participants.
Shifting Priorities of Investors and Members. We believe that institutional
investors are demanding greater liquidity, lower cost and more efficient trade
execution, enhanced access and a sophisticated supporting infrastructure. In
addition, traditional open outcry exchanges are competing with new electronic
markets, which are generally lower cost, more accessible, very focused, faster
in trade execution and, increasingly, more liquid. These pressures are forcing
traditional open outcry exchanges, such as the CBOT, to modernize in order to
remain competitive.
Additional pressure is placed on the industry by the over-the-counter
derivatives market, which is estimated by the Bank for International
Settlements to have grown to over $95 trillion in notional amount outstanding
as of December 2000. Further, according to the Bank for International
Settlements, transaction volume through 2000 in over-the-counter derivatives is
growing faster than transaction volume in exchange-listed derivatives.
Members of exchanges are also under increasing pressure from clients and new
entrants in the marketplace. As a result, we believe that members of exchanges
are generally concerned about the long-term value of their memberships.
Advances in Technology and Electronic Trading. Technological innovations are
creating new competitors and encouraging the development of electronic trading
systems that are challenging traditional open outcry exchanges. According to
industry data assembled by the CBOT, from 1995 through 2000, contract volume
traded on open outcry derivatives exchanges has declined by over 29%, and
electronic trading has grown by more than 143%. Based on industry trends
outside the United States, we expect that electronic trading will account for
virtually all overseas trading in the near future.
Some leading exchanges are already fully electronic and other leading
exchanges are aggressively pursuing an electronic trading model. We believe
that major securities exchanges and quotation systems, such as the New York
Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq Stock Market are under pressure from electronic
communications networks. About one dozen electronic communications networks
have been established in the United States, many during the last four years, by
leading investment banks, broker-dealers and market markers, which are aligning
themselves with multiple alternative systems. For example, according to
Internet Trading Magazine, Goldman Sachs has made investments in four
electronic communications networks. In addition, according to a special study
prepared by the SEC's Division of Market Regulation, electronic communications
networks have already captured about one-third of Nasdaq's trading volume.
42
The CBOT is facing increasing competition from electronic competitors. For
example, Cantor/eSpeed has introduced an electronic trading system for cash
bonds, futures on Treasury bonds and block over-the-counter derivatives trades
for large derivatives dealers. In addition, BrokerTec, which is owned by
several of the largest United States and European investment banks, currently
provides electronic, inter-dealer brokerage for Treasury bonds and euro-
denominated sovereign debt, and plans to introduce an electronic trading system
for futures and other derivatives during the last half of 2001.
Industry Realignment. Some exchanges that have restructured in response to
industry pressures have demutualized and have become for-profit entities.
Through demutualization, exchanges are streamlining their corporate governance
structure, quickening their organizational decision-making, improving their
access to capital and technology, and enhancing their ability to quickly enter
into strategic alliances. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the New York
Mercantile Exchange and the Hong Kong Futures Exchange, among others, have
recently demutualized. Some exchanges have announced that they are considering
initial public offerings to raise capital necessary for strategic endeavors.
The Australian Stock Exchange and OM Gruppen AB are already publicly-held
corporations. The New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq, Chicago Mercantile Exchange
and Sydney Futures Exchange have each indicated at various times in the past
that they have considered initial public offerings.
In addition to demutualization, we believe that the futures industry will
consolidate pursuant to mergers and alliances of exchanges in order to achieve
the economies of scale and expanded geographic reach necessary to remain
competitive in a rapidly changing marketplace.
Objectives of the Restructuring Strategy
We have determined that it is desirable for the CBOT to restructure in
response to the changing marketplace in order to meet two principal objectives.
First, the current corporate governance structure of the CBOT, which is slow to
respond and primarily oriented towards delivering member benefits and
supporting member opportunity rather than enterprise profitability, must be
changed to adopt a more streamlined decision-making process, more focused on
maximizing value to the enterprise. Second, the CBOT should respond to the
technological innovations that are currently shaping the futures industry.
With these objectives in mind, we evaluated a number of restructuring
alternatives as described below under "--Strategic Alternatives Considered." We
determined that any new structure should incorporate both an updated open
outcry exchange, in response to member demand, and an electronic marketplace,
in response to competitive pressures.
Strategic Alternatives Considered
We initially considered four principal restructuring strategies, taking into
account the relevant associated business, legal, tax and regulatory issues.
Each alternative strategy incorporated a variation of the corporate structure
and equity ownership of the entities. The principal restructuring strategies we
considered included the following:
. maintaining the CBOT in its current form as a parent company and creating
a separate electronic trading company as a subsidiary;
. restructuring the CBOT into two separate and independent for-profit
companies, one to conduct the open outcry trading business and the other
to conduct the electronic trading business;
. organizing a single demutualized holding company with an open outcry
subsidiary and an electronic trading company subsidiary; and
. operating the electronic trading business through the parent company and
creating a subsidiary to operate our open outcry markets.
43
For some time, we considered pursuing a strategy of restructuring the CBOT
into two separate for-profit companies. As autonomous entities, each with a
separate business focus, we initially believed that each of the companies would
be well positioned to make independent strategic business decisions and pursue
appropriate business opportunities. We believed that, as for-profit companies,
each would have the financial and decision-making flexibility to pursue
alliances and joint ventures, as well as the resources to make necessary
technology investments.
In late August 2000, we concluded that such a strategy was no longer
appropriate in light of a number of factors, including, among other things,
increasing competitive pressures in the industry, adverse changes in the
capital markets, further review and analysis regarding the implementation and
execution of separate business plans for the two independent companies, the
overall financial status of the CBOT and the need for the CBOT to demutualize
as quickly as possible so that it could enhance its competitive posture and
improve its decision-making capability. Accordingly, we ultimately rejected the
two-company strategy and determined to adopt a strategy of demutualizing the
CBOT and operating the electronic trading company as a wholly owned subsidiary.
Following further evaluation and analysis, we concluded that, under then-
existing conditions, the revised restructuring strategy would achieve benefits
similar to those associated with the creation of two separate companies, while
preserving our flexibility to consider pursuing one or more value-enhancing
transactions in the future, as described above under "--Overview." Among other
things, the revised strategy was designed to encourage independent operation of
the electronic trading business in a competitive manner, but under a common
ownership structure that will allow substantial sharing of resources and
infrastructure. We believe that the restructuring transactions will enable us
to successfully implement this strategy.
More recently, we reconsidered the holding company structure as a strategic
alternative as a result of further changes in competitive pressures in the
industry, the continued adverse condition of the capital markets and the
refinement of our long-term strategic objectives. We believe the holding
company structure represents a refinement of the previously approved
restructuring transactions that is consistent with the revised restructuring
strategy adopted in August 2000 in that it encourages independent operation of
the electronic trading business under a common ownership structure while
providing us additional structural flexibility to organize our business in a
manner that will allow us to achieve our long-term strategic objectives. In
addition, we believe that the holding company structure will allow us to
maintain the CBOT as a nonstock membership corporation, which will provide us
with certain benefits associated with such form of organization.
Description of the Restructuring Transactions
The restructuring transactions are designed to:
. demutualize our organization by creating a stock, for-profit holding
company, CBOT Holdings, and distributing shares of common stock of CBOT
Holdings to our members, while maintaining the CBOT as a nonstock
subsidiary of CBOT Holdings;
. modernize our corporate governance structure by substantially eliminating
the membership petition process, adopting a more modern mechanism for
initiating and voting on stockholder proposals and making certain other
changes to improve our corporate decision-making process; and
. reorganize and consolidate our electronic trading business, part of which
is currently operated by Ceres, into eCBOT, which would be operated as a
wholly owned corporate subsidiary of the CBOT.
The demutualization of the CBOT will be accomplished, in part, by merging
the CBOT with a newly formed nonstock, for-profit subsidiary, which will result
in the CBOT being the surviving entity pursuant to the terms of an agreement
and plan of merger. Upon completion of the reorganization merger, the CBOT will
become a nonstock, for-profit corporation and a subsidiary of CBOT Holdings.
For more information on the reorganization merger, including a chart depicting
the organization structure following completion of the reorganization merger,
see "--Reorganization Merger."
44
In connection with the completion of the reorganization merger, members will
receive a dividend of shares of common stock in CBOT Holdings, which will
generally have traditional features of common stock, including dividend, voting
and liquidation rights, in accordance with an allocation methodology described
in this document as set forth in the table below.
Shares of Common Stock of CBOT Holdings
to Be Received Per CBOT Membership
Shares of
Membership Common Stock
---------- ------------
Full 25,000
Associate 5,000
GIM 2,500
IDEM 300
COM 350
Immediately after completion of the restructuring transactions, our members
will be the only common stockholders of CBOT Holdings.
In addition, upon completion of the reorganization merger, the CBOT
subsidiary will create three new classes of membership: Class A memberships,
Class B memberships and Class C memberships. CBOT Holdings will hold the sole
Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary, which will entitle CBOT Holdings to
the exclusive right to vote on most matters requiring a vote of the members of
the CBOT subsidiary, as well as the exclusive right to receive all
distributions, dividends and proceeds upon liquidation from the CBOT
subsidiary. The Class B memberships will consist of five separate series:
Series B-1, Series B-2, Series B-3, Series B-4 and Series B-5, with each series
having associated with it trading rights and privileges that correspond to one
of the current five classes of CBOT membership. As set forth in the table
below, members of the CBOT will receive one of the five series of Class B
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary in respect of each membership held by such
member. In addition, each Full Member will also receive a Class C membership in
the CBOT subsidiary, which will, subject to satisfaction of certain
requirements, entitle the holder to become a member of the Chicago Board
Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership on such exchange.
Following completion of the restructuring transactions, the Class C membership
of the CBOT subsidiary will represent the Chicago Board Options Exchange
exercise right held by the Full Members of the CBOT.
Memberships in the CBOT Subsidiary
to be Received Per CBOT Membership
Number and Series Number of CBOT
Class of CBOT of CBOT Subsidiary Subsidiary
Membership Class B Memberships Class C Memberships
------------- ------------------- -------------------
Full 1 Series B-1 1 Class C
Associate 1 Series B-2 --
GIM 1 Series B-3 --
IDEM 1 Series B-4 --
COM 1 Series B-5 --
In connection with the restructuring transactions, we will also modernize
our corporate governance structure in a manner designed to improve our
decision-making processes, which we believe will enable us to compete more
effectively in the future. Specifically, our new corporate governance structure
will:
. substantially eliminate the membership petition process and generally
reduce the ability of members to participate in our day-to-day management
and operations;
. adopt a more modern mechanism for initiating and voting on stockholder
proposals;
. improve our corporate decision-making process by reducing the number of
directors serving on the boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and the
CBOT subsidiary from 18 members to nine members and eliminating certain
committees; and
45
. provide for certain change of control provisions, such as, among other
things, advance notice requirements, a prohibition on stockholder action
by written consent and a prohibition on the ability of stockholders to
call special meetings of stockholders.
As a result of the reorganization and consolidation of our electronic
trading business into our wholly owned eCBOT subsidiary, members who are
limited partners of Ceres will receive a cash payment in exchange for their
limited partnership interests in Ceres pursuant to the Ceres merger as
described below and Ceres will be liquidated. The operations of Ceres will be
consolidated into eCBOT, with eCBOT conducting the electronic trading business
currently operated by Ceres.
Specifically, the restructuring transactions include the following:
Demutualization
As described in greater detail below, the demutualization generally involves
merging the CBOT with a newly created nonstock, for-profit membership
corporation, which will be a subsidiary of a newly created stock, for-profit
holding company, CBOT Holdings, and distributing shares of common stock of CBOT
Holdings to our members.
Formation of CBOT Holdings and CBOT Merger Sub
We have recently formed two subsidiaries, CBOT Holdings, Inc. and CBOT
Merger Sub, Inc., for the purpose of effecting the demutualization. CBOT
Holdings, a Delaware stock, for-profit corporation, is currently a direct and
wholly owned subsidiary of the CBOT. CBOT Merger Sub, a Delaware nonstock, for-
profit membership corporation, is currently a direct and wholly owned
subsidiary of CBOT Holdings. The following chart generally depicts the
structure of the CBOT immediately prior to consummation of the reorganization
merger:
[Chart]
[Members]
[Board of Trade Reorganization
of the City of Merger
Chicago, Inc.]
[Electronic [CBOT [Other
Chicago Board Holdings, Inc.] Subsidiaries]
of Trade, Inc.]
[Ceres Trading [CBOT Merger
Limited Sub, Inc.]
Partnership]
Distribution of Common Stock of CBOT Holdings
The reorganization of the CBOT into a holding company structure will be
accomplished by the reorganization merger, which, as described below under "--
Reorganization Merger," will result in the CBOT
46
becoming a subsidiary of CBOT Holdings. The reorganization merger will not,
however, result in the distribution of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings
to the members. Consequently, a separate mechanism will be utilized to effect
the distribution of common stock of CBOT Holdings to the members.
Prior to initiating the reorganization merger, our board of directors will
declare a dividend of shares of the common stock of CBOT Holdings that will be
payable to each CBOT member upon effectiveness of the reorganization merger.
The number of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings to be paid to each CBOT
member as a result of this dividend will be as follows:
Shares of Common Stock of CBOT Holdings
to Be Received Per CBOT Membership
Shares of
Membership Common Stock
---------- ------------
Full 25,000
Associate 5,000
GIM 2,500
IDEM 300
COM 350
This allocation is based on the allocation methodology developed and
recommended by the Independent Allocation Committee and adopted by our board.
For more information regarding the common stock of CBOT Holdings, and the
respective rights and privileges of such stock, see "Description of Capital
Stock--Common Stock." For more information regarding the determination of the
methodology for allocating shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings among the
members, see "--Independent Allocation Committee of the Board" and "--Opinion
of the Financial Advisor to the Independent Allocation Committee of the Board."
The allocation methodology utilized in the restructuring transactions is
currently the subject of a lawsuit brought against an alleged class of Full
Members of the CBOT on behalf of the "minority" members of the CBOT, consisting
of the Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs. For more information regarding
this litigation, see "Our Business--Legal Proceedings--Minority Member
Litigation."
Reorganization Merger
Pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger, the CBOT will merge with CBOT
Merger Sub, which will result in the CBOT being the surviving entity. Upon
completion of the reorganization merger, the CBOT will become a nonstock, for-
profit corporation and a subsidiary of CBOT Holdings. In connection with the
reorganization merger, the CBOT subsidiary will create three new classes of
membership: Class A memberships, Class B memberships and Class C memberships.
Class A Membership. CBOT Holdings will hold the sole Class A membership in
the CBOT subsidiary, which will entitle CBOT Holdings to the exclusive right to
vote on most matters requiring a vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, as
well as the exclusive right to receive all distributions, dividends and
proceeds upon liquidation from the CBOT subsidiary.
Class B Memberships. The Class B memberships will consist of five separate
series: Series B-1, Series B-2, Series B-3, Series B-4 and Series B-5, with
each series having associated with it trading rights and privileges that
correspond to one of the current five classes of membership of the CBOT. As set
forth in the table below, members will receive one of the five series of Class
B memberships in the CBOT subsidiary in respect of each membership held by such
member.
Class C Memberships. Each Full Member will also receive a Class C membership
in the CBOT subsidiary, which will, subject to satisfaction of certain
requirements, entitle the holder to exercise a right to become a
47
member of the Chicago Board Options Exchange without having to purchase a
membership on such exchange. Following completion of the restructuring
transactions, the Class C membership of the CBOT subsidiary will represent the
Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right held by the Full Members of the
CBOT.
Membership in the CBOT Subsidiary
to be Received Per CBOT Membership
Number and Number of
Series of CBOT CBOT
Class of Subsidiary Subsidiary
CBOT Class B Class C
Membership Memberships Memberships
---------- -------------- -----------
Full 1 Series B-1 1 Class C
Associate 1 Series B-2 --
GIM 1 Series B-3 --
IDEM 1 Series B-4 --
COM 1 Series B-5 --
Following completion of the reorganization merger, the structure of the CBOT
will be as set forth in the following chart:
[Chart]
[Stockholders/Members]
Common Stock
Class B and Class C
[CBOT Holdings, Inc.] Memberships
Class A Membership
[Board of Trade of the
City of Chicago, Inc.]
[Electronic [Other Subsidiaries]
Chicago Board
of Trade, Inc.]
We have included as Appendix C to this document the agreement and plan of
merger relating to the reorganization merger. We urge you to review carefully
the agreement and plan of merger before voting on the restructuring
transactions.
Modernization of Our Corporate Governance Structure
An important objective of the restructuring transactions is the
modernization of the corporate governance structure of the CBOT. Accordingly,
the restructuring transactions will involve significant changes, which will
48
largely occur as a result of the creation of a holding company structure and
certain changes to the certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and
regulations of the CBOT subsidiary.
Voting. The holders of the common stock of CBOT Holdings will have the right
to vote on all matters upon which the stockholders of CBOT Holdings will be
entitled to vote generally, including among other things, the election of
directors to the board of directors of CBOT Holdings. However, as described
below, the holders of the common stock of CBOT Holdings will not be entitled to
initiate proposals to amend the certificate of incorporation of CBOT Holdings
or, as described below, the certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and
regulations of the CBOT subsidiary.
CBOT Holdings, as the holder of the sole Class A membership in the CBOT
subsidiary, will have the exclusive right to vote on most matters requiring a
vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, including among other things, the
election of directors to the board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary. The
holders of Class B and Class C membership in the CBOT subsidiary will not have
voting rights with respect to matters requiring the vote of the members of the
CBOT subsidiary, except that holders of Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B
memberships will have limited voting rights to approve certain changes that
would adversely affect certain core rights relating to the trading rights and
privileges of the Class B members.
Specifically, the holders of Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships
will have the right to vote on any amendment to the certificate of
incorporation, bylaws or rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary that
would adversely affect the following core rights:
. the allocation of products that a holder of a specific series of Class B
membership is permitted to trade on the exchange facilities of the CBOT
subsidiary, e.g., the elimination of any product from a holder's trading
rights and privileges;
. the requirement that Class B members will be charged transaction fees for
trades of the CBOT subsidiary's products for their accounts that are
lower than the transaction fees charged to any participant who is not a
Class B member for the same products;
. the authorized number of memberships of any class or series of
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary;
. the membership and eligibility requirements to become a Class B member or
to exercise the associated trading rights or privileges; and
. the commitment to maintain current open outcry markets so long as each
such market is deemed liquid under the terms of the certificate of
incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary unless the discontinuance of any
such market is approved by the holders of the Series B-1 and Series B-2,
Class B memberships. This commitment to maintain current open outcry
markets is described further below under "--Commitment to Maintain Open
Outcry Markets."
Holders of Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships will be the only
members of the CBOT subsidiary entitled to vote on such amendments, with
holders of Series B-1, Class B memberships entitled to one vote per membership
and holders of Series B-2, Class B memberships entitled to one-sixth of one
vote per membership.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the then
outstanding Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships in the CBOT
subsidiary, voting together as a single class based on their respective voting
power, will be required in order to approve such amendments. Based on the
respective voting power of these two series of Class B memberships, any such
amendment could be approved by the holders of Series B-1, Class B memberships
even though the holders of Series B-2, Class B memberships voted against the
amendment. This result is consistent with the result that would be obtained
under the CBOT's existing certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and
regulations with respect to matters voted on by Full Members and Associate
Members as a single class.
49
The holders of Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships will have no
right to initiate or unilaterally effectuate any of the amendments described
above as to which they are entitled to vote; rather, their right to vote on
such matters will only be triggered if the board of directors of the CBOT
subsidiary or the holder of the Class A membership proposes any such amendment.
Commitment to Maintain Open Outcry Markets. The certificate of incorporation
of the CBOT subsidiary will provide that, subject to the following terms and
conditions, the CBOT subsidiary will be obligated to maintain current open
outcry markets and provide financial support to each such market for
technology, marketing and research, which the board of directors determines, in
its sole and absolute discretion, is reasonably necessary to maintain each such
open outcry market.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary
may discontinue any open outcry market at such time and in such manner as it
may determine if the board of directors determines, in its sole and absolute
discretion, that a market is no longer "liquid" in accordance with the criteria
described below or the holders of a majority of the voting power of the then
outstanding Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships, voting together as
a single class based on their respective voting power, approve the
discontinuance of such open outcry market.
For purposes of the foregoing, an open outcry market will be deemed "liquid"
for so long as it meets either of the following tests, in each case as measured
on a quarterly basis:
. if a comparable exchange-traded product exists, the open outcry market
has maintained at least 30 percent of the average daily volume of such
comparable product, including for calculation purposes, volume from
exchange-for-physicals transactions in such open outcry market; or
. if no comparable exchange-traded product exists, the open outcry market
has maintained at least 40 percent of the average quarterly volume in
that market as maintained by the CBOT in 2000, including, for calculation
purposes, volume from exchange-for-physicals transactions in such open
outcry market.
Board of Directors. On October 16, 2001, our board of directors approved and
adopted amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which, if
approved by our members, would authorize our board of directors to delay the
next annual election, which is currently scheduled for December 2001, until no
later than March 31, 2002, reduce the size of our board of directors from 18
members to nine members at the first annual election following timely approval
of the restructuring transactions by our members, clarify our board of
directors' discretion as to the timing of its regular meetings and make certain
other conforming changes. A special meeting of the members for the purpose of
voting on such amendments has been scheduled for October 31, 2001. If our
members approve such amendments and separately approve the restructuring
transactions in a timely manner, our board of directors will be reduced in size
from 18 directors to nine directors in connection with the next annual
election, which will be held as soon as reasonably practicable following
membership approval of the restructuring transactions, but in no event later
than March 31, 2002. At such annual election, our members will elect eight new
directors to serve on the nine-member board of directors with the then current
chairman of the board continuing to serve in such capacity as the ninth member
of such board. Upon completion of the restructuring transactions, the new
directors elected to serve on the nine-member board of directors will continue
to serve on the boards of directors of both CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary until the next annual meeting of each such corporation.
If the amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not
approved by our members or the membership vote on the restructuring
transactions does not occur in a timely manner, and, as a result, the size of
our board of directors is not reduced from 18 directors to nine directors prior
to the completion of the restructuring transactions, the certificate of
incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings will provide that the then current
18-member board of directors will continue as the boards of directors of CBOT
Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary immediately following completion of the
restructuring transactions. The size of the board of directors of CBOT Holdings
will thereafter be reduced to nine directors in connection with a special
meeting of stockholders, to be held as soon as reasonably practicable following
completion of the restructuring
50
transactions. At such special meeting, the stockholders will elect eight new
directors to serve on the nine-member board of directors with the then current
chairman of the board continuing to serve in such capacity as the ninth member
of such board. In connection with the election of directors to the new nine-
member board of directors of CBOT Holdings, it is anticipated that CBOT
Holdings, as the sole Class A member of the CBOT subsidiary, will elect each of
the newly-elected directors serving on the nine-member board of directors of
CBOT Holdings as directors of the CBOT subsidiary. Each director of CBOT
Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary will be elected to serve as a director until
the next annual meeting of each such corporation and will not be subject to
term limits.
In order to ensure that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings is generally
identical in size and composition to the board of directors of the CBOT
subsidiary, it will be a qualification for service as a director of the CBOT
subsidiary that such director also serve on the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings. The nine-member boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary will each consist of:
. the chairman of the board;
. five directors who are Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary;
. two directors who are "independent" within the meaning of the certificate
of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings; and
. one director who is "at-large," or generally not subject to
qualifications.
We currently expect that the president and chief executive officer of CBOT
Holdings will be nominated for election as the at-large director.
Committees. In general, CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary will have a
limited number of board committees and certain board and other committees
currently maintained by the CBOT will be eliminated in order to further
streamline our corporate governance structure. We currently expect that CBOT
Holdings will have a nominating committee of the board, an executive committee
of the board, an audit committee of the board and a compensation committee of
the board. In addition to these committees, we currently anticipate that the
boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary will create or
maintain certain non-board advisory committees and other non-board committees
comprised of directors, officers and stockholders or members, as appropriate.
Substantial Elimination of the Petition Process. Currently, voting members
of the CBOT have the right to vote on all amendments to the CBOT's certificate
of incorporation and bylaws, which include the rules of the CBOT. In addition,
members have the right to petition the board to call a special meeting of
members for the purpose of voting on amendments to the bylaws and rules. This
process, together with certain other provisions, including those relating to
the nomination procedures for elective officers and the annual election,
constitute what is sometimes referred to as the "petition process" of the CBOT
membership.
In connection with the restructuring transactions, the petition process is
being substantially eliminated, with the principal exception consisting of the
preservation of certain core rights associated with the trading rights and
privileges of Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary. As a result, the ability
of the holders of common stock of CBOT Holdings and the Class B and Class C
members of the CBOT subsidiary to participate in the day-to-day management and
operations of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary, respectively, will be
significantly reduced. In sharp contrast to the substantial rights of current
CBOT members pursuant to the petition process, stockholders of CBOT Holdings
will have rights more consistent with those of stockholders of a publicly held
corporation and members of the CBOT subsidiary will have substantially reduced
rights relative to the current rights of CBOT members.
Specifically, the holders of the common stock of CBOT Holdings will not be
entitled to initiate proposals to amend the certificate of incorporation of
CBOT Holdings or, as described below, the certificate of incorporation, bylaws
and rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary. Any proposal by stockholders
of CBOT Holdings to adopt, repeal and amend the bylaws of CBOT Holdings may
only be brought to a vote at an annual meeting after satisfying certain advance
notice requirements described below and will require the
51
approval of two-thirds of the voting power of the stockholders of CBOT Holdings
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. The bylaws of CBOT
Holdings will provide that stockholders may not call special meetings of
stockholders and only the chairman, the president and the board of directors
will have the right to call such special meetings. The bylaws of CBOT Holdings
will contain provisions requiring that advance notice be delivered to CBOT
Holdings of any business to be brought by a stockholder before an annual
meeting of stockholders and providing for certain procedures to be followed by
stockholders in nominating persons for election to CBOT Holdings' board of
directors. Generally, such advance notice provisions will require that for an
annual meeting a stockholder must give written notice to the secretary of CBOT
Holdings not less than 30, nor more than 75, days prior to the first
anniversary of the date on which CBOT Holdings first mailed its proxy materials
for the preceding year's annual meeting of stockholders. In each case, the
notice must set forth specific information regarding such stockholder and each
director nominee or other business proposed by such stockholder, as applicable,
as provided in CBOT Holdings' bylaws. Except with respect to nominations by
stockholders for persons to be elected to the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings at a special meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be
elected, stockholders of CBOT Holdings will not be permitted to make proposals,
or bring other business, to a special meeting of stockholders.
As described above, CBOT Holdings, as the holder of the sole Class A
membership in the CBOT subsidiary, will have the exclusive right to vote on
most matters requiring a vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, including
among other things, the election of directors to the board of directors of the
CBOT subsidiary. The holders of Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT
subsidiary will not have voting rights with respect to matters requiring a vote
of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, except that holders of Series B-1 and
Series B-2, Class B memberships will have limited voting rights to approve
certain changes that would adversely affect certain core rights relating to the
trading rights and privileges of Class B members. Accordingly, the certificate
of incorporation and bylaws of the CBOT subsidiary do not provide Class B and
Class C members the right to bring proposals before annual or special meetings
of the membership of the CBOT subsidiary nor will Class B and Class C members
have the right to call special meetings of the membership of the CBOT
subsidiary.
Change of Control Provisions. CBOT Holdings' certificate of incorporation
and bylaws will contain a number of provisions that may have the effect of
encouraging persons considering unsolicited tender offers or other unilateral
takeover proposals to negotiate with the board of directors rather than pursue
non-negotiated takeover attempts. The provisions will include, among other
things:
. advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals;
. application of the Delaware anti-takeover statute;
. a requirement that special meetings of the stockholders of CBOT Holdings
be called by only the chairman of the board, the president or the board
of directors;
. a prohibition on the ability of stockholders to take action by written
consent; and
. a requirement that any stockholder proposal to amend the bylaws be
approved by at least two-thirds of the voting power of all outstanding
shares of capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors.
In addition, we currently anticipate that CBOT Holdings would be asked to
consider, and may adopt, a stockholder rights plan or "poison pill" in
connection with any underwritten public offering of its common stock. We have
no current plan or intention to conduct such an offering.
52
You are being asked to approve and adopt the amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary as part of the restructuring transactions. We have included the form
of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT
Holdings as Appendix F and Appendix G to this document, respectively. In
addition, we have included the form of the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws of the CBOT subsidiary as Appendix H and Appendix I to
this document, respectively. The amended and restated certificate of
incorporation of CBOT Holdings will become effective immediately prior to the
time the reorganization merger becomes effective and the amended and restated
certificate of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary will become effective at
the time the merger becomes effective, which we currently expect to occur as
soon as reasonably practicable following membership approval of the
propositions relating to the restructuring transactions, as described elsewhere
in this document, and satisfaction of all of the other conditions to the CBOT's
obligation to complete the restructuring transactions. We urge you to review
carefully all of the terms and conditions of the amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary before voting on the restructuring transactions.
In addition, you are being asked to approve and adopt certain changes to the
rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary as part of the restructuring
transactions. We currently expect that these changes to our rules and
regulations will take effect at the time that the amended and restated
certificate of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary becomes effective. The form
of the rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary, which, subject to other
changes to the rules and regulations occurring after the date of this document,
we currently expect to be the rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary
immediately after the restructuring transactions, as well as the current rules
and regulations of the CBOT, have been filed as exhibits to the registration
statement of which this document is a part. We have included as Appendix J to
this document a summary entitled "Status of Certain Current CBOT Rules and
Regulations as a Result of the Restructuring Transactions," which summarizes
the changes to current rules and regulations that will occur as a result of the
restructuring transactions. We urge you to review carefully the summary of the
changes to the rules and regulations as well as the above-referenced exhibits
before voting on the restructuring transactions.
For more information about these changes to our corporate governance
structure, and how such changes will affect your rights and obligations, see
"Comparison of the Rights of Members of the CBOT Prior to and After Completion
of the Restructuring Transactions."
Reorganization of Our Electronic Trading Business
In connection with the restructuring transactions, our electronic trading
business, operated by Ceres, will be reorganized and consolidated into eCBOT,
our wholly owned subsidiary, so that, following the restructuring transactions,
eCBOT will conduct the electronic trading business of the CBOT. We describe
these transactions briefly below.
In preparation for the reorganization of our electronic trading business, we
will form a merger subsidiary, Ceres Merger Sub, Inc., for the purpose of
effecting the reorganization. Ceres Merger Sub will be a Delaware corporation
and a wholly owned subsidiary of the CBOT. Following the reorganization merger,
Ceres Merger Sub will be a direct and wholly owned subsidiary of the CBOT
subsidiary. As part of the reorganization of our electronic trading business,
Ceres Merger Sub will merge with and into Ceres, with Ceres as the surviving
entity. As a result of this merger, eCBOT will remain the general partner of
Ceres and the CBOT subsidiary will become a limited partner of Ceres. Following
the Ceres merger, Ceres will liquidate and its assets will be distributed to
the CBOT subsidiary and eCBOT, pursuant to the terms of the Ceres limited
partnership agreement. The CBOT subsidiary will then transfer to eCBOT assets
relating to the electronic trading business. As a result, eCBOT will own and
operate the electronic trading business of the CBOT subsidiary, including our
50% ownership interest in CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C., and our interest in the
a/c/e software.
Pursuant to the Ceres merger, the limited partners of Ceres, other than
eCBOT, will receive a cash payment in exchange for their limited partnership
interests. The amount of cash payment that will be
53
distributed in exchange for each limited partnership interest will be
determined by our board of directors and the board of directors of eCBOT, the
general partner of Ceres, after considering each limited partnership interest's
allocable portion of the value of Ceres.
Arthur Andersen has been retained to conduct a valuation analysis of Ceres
in order to provide to our board of directors its opinion of the fair market
value of Ceres and each of the underlying partnership interests as of a date
reasonably proximate to the date of the completion of the Ceres merger. Arthur
Andersen's final valuation report will provide the basis for determining the
amount of the cash payment to be distributed as merger consideration among the
Ceres limited partners in the Ceres merger. The amount of the specific cash
payment that will be distributed to each limited partner of Ceres will not be
determined by our board of directors and the board of directors of eCBOT until
the time of the completion of the Ceres merger.
In October 2001, Arthur Andersen prepared a preliminary valuation analysis
that concluded the fair market value of Ceres as of June 30, 2001 was
$25,400,000. The full text of the preliminary Ceres valuation analysis is
attached as Appendix D-3 to this document. According to this analysis, the
allocation of value of Ceres among the general partner and the limited partner
classes as of June 30, 2001 was as follows:
Valuation of Ceres
As of June 30, 2001
Partnership Interest Valuation
-------------------- ---------
General Partner $ 2,540,000
Class A-1 Limited Partners 16,051,984
Class A-2 Limited Partners 1,499,894
Class A-3 Limited Partners 154,560
Class A-4 Limited Partners 73,562
Class B Limited Partners 5,080,000
-----------
Total (rounded) $25,400,000
===========
For purposes of illustration, the following chart indicates the amount of
the cash payment that would have been distributed for each Class A limited
partnership interest if the distribution had been made on the basis of Arthur
Andersen's valuation of Ceres as of June 30, 2001 as described below.
Illustrative Example of
the Amount of the Cash Payment To Be
Received Per Ceres Class A Partnership Interest
As of June 30, 2001
Cash
Limited Partnership Interest Payment
---------------------------- ----------
Class A-1 $11,499.35
Class A-2 1,908.26
Class A-3 954.07
Class A-4 57.25
Class B limited partnership interests are currently held only by our
clearing members and, according to the terms of the Ceres limited partnership
agreement, part of the value of the Class B limited partnership interests is
based upon the CBOT trading volume of the member holding such limited
partnership interest. As a result, the value of each Class B limited
partnership interest, and the amount of the cash payment to be distributed with
respect to that limited partnership interest, varies by holder. Based upon
Arthur Andersen's valuation of Ceres as of June 30, 2001, a total of $5,080,000
would be distributed to the 60 holders of Class B limited partnership interests
in Ceres.
54
You should understand that the actual amount of the cash payment to be
issued to each Ceres limited partner will be determined by our board of
directors and the board of directors of eCBOT after considering the value of
each limited partnership interest as presented in Arthur Andersen's final
valuation report to be delivered to the board of directors as of a date
reasonably proximate to the date of the completion of the Ceres merger and is
not capable of determination at this time. Accordingly, the description above
is for illustrative purposes only.
For more information regarding the valuation of Ceres, see "--Ceres
Valuation Analysis of Arthur Andersen."
Arthur Andersen was also retained by our board of directors and the board of
directors of eCBOT to evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, to
Ceres and each class of its limited partners of the consideration to be
received by each Ceres limited partner in exchange for their respective limited
partnership interests pursuant to the Ceres merger. For more information, see
"--Opinion of Arthur Andersen to the Board of Directors Regarding the Fairness
of the Ceres Merger."
Although you are being asked to approve the reorganization of our electronic
trading business because it is part of the restructuring transactions, you are
not being asked to separately approve the Ceres merger. We expect that the
Ceres merger will be approved by the board of directors of Ceres Merger Sub, by
the CBOT, as the sole stockholder of Ceres Merger Sub, and eCBOT, as the
general partner of Ceres, and that the Ceres merger will be completed as soon
as reasonably practicable following the effectiveness of the reorganization
merger. However, if the CBOT members entitled to vote do not approve all three
of the propositions relating to the restructuring transactions submitted for
their approval, the Ceres merger will not be completed. Our obligation to
complete the Ceres merger is also conditioned on the satisfaction of the other
conditions to the CBOT's obligation to complete the restructuring transactions.
For more information about certain regulatory approvals and other conditions to
implementing the transactions, see "--Regulatory Matters" and "--Conditions to
Completing the Restructuring Transactions."
Independent Allocation Committee of the Board
In January 2000, in connection with its approval of the original
restructuring strategy, our board of directors established an Independent
Allocation Committee of the board, composed solely of public or independent
directors of the board, to determine and recommend to the full board an
appropriate and fair allocation among the CBOT members of shares in the two
companies contemplated by the original restructuring strategy: the company
conducting the updated open outcry trading business and the company conducting
the electronic trading business.
To assure the independence of the process, each member of the Independent
Allocation Committee confirmed that there were no conflicts of interest
presented by his service on the Independent Allocation Committee, and that
neither any member nor any person in a member's family held a financial
interest in a CBOT member. The Independent Allocation Committee engaged an
independent financial advisor, William Blair, and special counsel, Winston &
Strawn, to assist in developing its recommendation. Again, each of these
advisors confirmed that their service to the Independent Allocation Committee
did not present a conflict of interest. Governor Thompson, the Chairman of the
Independent Allocation Committee, is the Chairman of Winston & Strawn, special
counsel to the Independent Allocation Committee. Members of the Independent
Allocation Committee each initially received a fee of $20,000 for service on
the committee. In connection with their continued service on the Independent
Allocation Committee, in October 2001, Governor Thompson and Mr. Weems each
received an additional fee of $20,000 for service on the Committee. In
addition, the CBOT agreed to indemnify each member against liabilities arising
from such service. Also, the CBOT agreed to compensate each member of the
Independent Allocation Committee for time spent in connection with any
litigation proceeding relating to the matters considered by the Independent
Allocation Committee at an hourly rate, not to exceed $500, equal to the rate
at which such member is compensated by third parties for legal or
55
consulting services or, if no such rate is applicable to a member, such rate as
is mutually agreed to by the CBOT and the member.
During the course of its initial deliberations, which took place from
January to May 2000, the Independent Allocation Committee and its advisors
reviewed member correspondence regarding their views on allocation; met with
various membership committees and groups as well as CBOT management and staff;
reviewed various CBOT organizational documents, documents relating to the
creation of memberships and certain trading and financial statistics relating
to the CBOT, including historical prices for memberships; reviewed various
other materials prepared for the CBOT or the board of directors by outside
consultants, financial, legal and other advisors; participated in various
meetings with such advisors; and researched other relevant data, including the
allocation methodologies used by other exchanges in connection with
demutualization transactions.
After considering various methodologies for allocation, the Independent
Allocation Committee concluded that it would be appropriate to adopt an
allocation methodology that takes into account a combination of factors rather
than a single factor and includes the following:
. relative liquidation rights;
. relative voting rights;
. the allocation made in connection with the formation of Ceres;
. the market values of memberships; and
. the contract volumes for which each class of membership has been
responsible on a historical basis.
Although the Independent Allocation Committee did not believe that it was
appropriate to assign specific weight to any particular factor, the Independent
Allocation Committee concluded that, in establishing an allocation, relatively
greater importance should be given to liquidation rights, voting rights and the
allocation made to members in connection with the formation of Ceres. Based on
its deliberations, on May 5, 2000, the Independent Allocation Committee
unanimously recommended to the full board that an allocation of shares of
common stock in each of the then proposed open outcry trading and electronic
trading companies to each Full Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM in
the ratio of 5.0 : 1.0 : 0.50 : 0.06 : 0.07 was fair. In reaching this
conclusion, the Independent Allocation Committee received and considered an
opinion dated May 5, 2000 from William Blair that the allocation recommended by
the Independent Allocation Committee in connection with the restructuring was
fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of each class of
membership. For more information on this opinion, see "--Opinion of the
Financial Advisor to the Independent Allocation Committee of the Board."
The recommendation of the Independent Allocation Committee on May 5, 2000,
as well as the opinion of William Blair as of such date, were based on a number
of assumptions, including that:
. the restructuring would not take the form of a liquidation;
. the trading rights and privileges of each class, including the Chicago
Board Options Exchange exercise right of Full Members, would continue;
. each member would receive in addition to their trading rights the
appropriate number of shares in both the then proposed open outcry
trading and electronic trading companies per the allocation;
. each company's shares would be issued with equal per share voting and
liquidation rights;
. such shares would be in addition to any shares or other consideration
received in connection with the reorganization of Ceres, which
transaction was outside the purview of the Committee.
The allocation did not take into consideration any transaction with the Chicago
Board Options Exchange, and the allocation of assets and liabilities between
the then proposed open outcry trading and electronic trading companies was
beyond the purview of the Independent Allocation Committee.
56
On May 16, 2000, the full board approved and adopted the recommendation made
by the Independent Allocation Committee on May 5, 2000, subject to any changes
in the underlying assumptions, and subject to the board's further approval of
the definitive terms and structure of transactions designed to implement the
restructuring.
Following the adoption by the board of directors of the revised
restructuring strategy in August 2000, the Independent Allocation Committee
undertook to consider the revised restructuring strategy and update its
recommendation regarding an appropriate and fair allocation of value among CBOT
members in the context of the revised restructuring strategy.
In the course of updating its initial recommendation regarding the
allocation of equity among members of CBOT, the Independent Allocation
Committee reviewed various aspects of the revised restructuring strategy that
were developed subsequent to May 5, 2000, including:
. the change in the form of the restructuring transactions to provide for
the distribution and allocation solely of shares of the then proposed
stock, for-profit company and the formation of eCBOT as a wholly owned
subsidiary of CBOT;
. the board of directors' decision to reorganize and consolidate the
electronic trading business into eCBOT through a series of transactions
involving Ceres, including a merger transaction in which limited
partnership interests in Ceres would be exchanged for shares of
convertible preferred stock of the stock, for-profit company; and
. the proposal to issue shares of common stock of the then proposed stock,
for-profit company in two classes: Class A common stock with traditional
voting, liquidation and dividend rights that would represent
substantially all of the equity value and voting power initially
evidenced by the common stock of the then proposed stock, for-profit
company; and Class B common stock that would be issued in five series,
two of which would have special voting rights with respect to certain
trading rights and privileges of Class B common stockholders, each of
which series would entitle an eligible holder to trading rights and
privileges that would correspond to, and would be substantially similar
to, the trading rights and privileges of one of the five member classes
of CBOT.
The Independent Allocation Committee also considered such other factors as
it deemed relevant, including the trading volume activity by various membership
classes and the trading prices for various memberships. Based on these
deliberations and its conclusion that the factors which supported its initial
recommendation remained an appropriate basis for determining an allocation
methodology in the context of the restructuring transactions and that such
factors had not changed in any material respect since May 5, 2000, on November
21, 2000 the Independent Allocation Committee unanimously recommended to the
full board that an allocation of shares of Class A common stock of the then
proposed stock, for-profit company among the members in respect of their
memberships in connection with the restructuring in the ratio of 5.0 : 1.0 :
0.50 : 0.06 : 0.07 to each Full Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM,
respectively, was fair. In reaching this conclusion, the Independent Allocation
Committee received and considered an updated oral opinion on November 20, 2000,
which was confirmed in writing on November 21, 2000, from William Blair that
such allocation was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of
each class of membership. For more information on this updated opinion, see "--
Opinion of the Financial Advisor to the Independent Allocation Committee of the
Board."
The updated recommendation of the Independent Allocation Committee on
November 21, 2000, as well as the opinion of William Blair as of such date,
were based on a number of assumptions, including that:
. the restructuring will not take the form of a liquidation;
. the trading rights and privileges of each membership class, including the
Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right of Full Members, would
continue;
. each member would receive, in addition to a share of the appropriate
series of Class B common stock and associated trading rights and
privileges, the number of shares of Class A common stock to which
57
such member would be entitled in the then proposed stock, for-profit
company per the allocation ratio in respect of his or her membership;
. such shares would be in addition to the shares of convertible preferred
stock or other consideration received in connection with the Ceres
merger, the fairness of which transaction was beyond the purview the
Independent Allocation Committee and the opinion of William Blair; and
. the allocation did not take into consideration any possible transaction
or business combination with any other party.
On January 16, 2001, immediately prior to the meeting of the board of
directors to consider the restructuring transactions, the Independent
Allocation Committee met to review and consider certain refinements to the
restructuring transactions recommended by the Executive Committee and
management. At the meeting of the board of directors, the Independent
Allocation Committee reported to the board of directors that it had reviewed
such refinements to the restructuring transactions recommended by the
Executive Committee and management and confirmed its updated recommendation
regarding the allocation among the members of Class A common stock of the then
proposed stock, for-profit company in respect of their memberships in
connection with the restructuring transactions, as currently proposed, as
provided to the board at the November 21, 2000 meeting. The Independent
Allocation Committee indicated that, in reaching this recommendation, it
received and considered an updated opinion of William Blair, dated January 16,
2001, that the proposed allocation was fair, from a financial point of view,
to each of the five classes of members.
In September 2001, the Independent Allocation Committee undertook to
consider further refinements to the restructuring transactions and update its
recommendation regarding an appropriate and fair allocation of value among
CBOT members in the context of the revised restructuring strategy. In the
course of updating its recommendation regarding the allocation of equity among
members of CBOT, the Independent Allocation Committee reviewed various aspects
of the restructuring transactions that were developed subsequent to January
16, 2001, including the refinements to the restructuring transactions to
provide for the creation of a holding company structure, the distribution of
shares of common stock of the holding company to the members of the CBOT and
the creation of a separate class of membership in the CBOT subsidiary to
represent the Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right. The Independent
Allocation Committee also considered such other factors as it deemed relevant,
including the trading volume activity by various membership classes and the
trading prices for various memberships. On September 13, 2001, the Independent
Allocation Committee met with representatives of William Blair, Winston &
Strawn and Kirkland & Ellis to consider these refinements and their impact, if
any, on their previous recommendations.
Based on these deliberations and its conclusion that the factors which
supported its earlier recommendation remained an appropriate basis for
determining an allocation methodology in the context of the restructuring
transactions and that such factors had not changed in any material respect
since January 16, 2001, the Independent Allocation Committee met again on
September 24, 2001, and unanimously adopted a recommendation, which was
delivered to the full board on October 2, 2001 that an allocation of shares of
common stock of CBOT Holdings among the members in respect of their
memberships in connection with the restructuring in the ratio of 5.0 : 1.0 :
0.50 : 0.06 : 0.07 to each Full Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM,
respectively, is fair. In reaching this conclusion, the Independent Allocation
Committee received and considered an updated opinion on September 24, 2001
from William Blair that such allocation is fair, from a financial point of
view, to the holders of each class of membership. For more information on this
updated opinion, see "--Opinion of the Financial Advisor to the Independent
Allocation Committee of the Board."
The updated recommendation of the Independent Allocation Committee on
September 24, 2001, as well as the opinion of William Blair as of such date,
were based on a number of assumptions, including that:
. the restructuring would not take the form of a liquidation;
. the trading rights and privileges of each membership class, including
the Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right of Full Members, would
remain intact;
58
. each member would receive, in addition to an appropriate series of Class
B membership in the CBOT subsidiary and associated trading rights and
privileges, the number of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings to
which such member would be entitled per the allocation ratio in respect
of his or her membership;
. each full member would receive a Class C membership in the CBOT subsidiary,
which would represent the Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right;
. such shares and memberships would be in addition to the cash payment
received in connection with the Ceres merger, the fairness of which
transaction was beyond the purview of the Independent Allocation
Committee and the opinion of William Blair; and
. the allocation did not take into consideration any possible transaction
or business combination with any other party.
Opinion of the Financial Advisor to the Independent Allocation Committee of the
Board
Since no mechanism currently exists in our certificate of incorporation or
bylaws for allocating ownership in our organization among the members, the CBOT
established the Independent Allocation Committee as described above under "--
Independent Allocation Committee of the Board" and William Blair was retained
by the Independent Allocation Committee to render a written opinion as to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the allocation of equity in CBOT
Holdings among CBOT members in respect of their memberships. William Blair was
hired based on its qualifications and expertise in providing financial advice
to companies and its reputation as a nationally recognized investment banking
firm. William Blair was paid total fees of $750,000 for the issuance of its
written opinion to the Independent Allocation Committee and the board of
directors and each update through the January 16, 2001 update. On September 7,
2001, the CBOT and William Blair agreed to extend William Blair's engagement
for 9 months for a fee of $200,000. Payment of the fees was not conditioned on
the conclusion reached by William Blair in its opinion. We also agreed to
indemnify William Blair against potential liabilities arising out of both its
initial and its extended engagement. We note that, in the opinion of the SEC,
indemnification against liabilities under the U.S. federal securities laws is
against the public policy expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable.
At the request of the Independent Allocation Committee, William Blair
originally delivered to the committee its oral fairness opinion on May 5, 2000,
which was also confirmed in writing as of such date and also addressed to our
board. In light of the August 31, 2000 abandonment of the original
restructuring strategy, which had contemplated two separate for-profit
companies, in favor of the revised restructuring strategy, which contemplated a
single demutualized company operating the electronic trading company as a
wholly owned subsidiary, William Blair reissued its opinion on November 20,
2000, which it confirmed in writing on November 21, 2000 and updated on January
16, 2001. The November 21, 2000 and January 16, 2001 opinions were also
addressed to our board.
In light of the further refinements to the revised restructuring strategy
recommended by the Executive Committee and management in September 2001, and at
the request of the Independent Allocation Committee, William Blair reviewed and
considered the refinements to the restructuring transactions, including the
creation of a holding company and the distribution of common stock of the
holding company to the members of the CBOT, and reissued its opinion by letter
dated September 24, 2001, the date on which the Independent Allocation
Committee confirmed its updated recommendation concerning the allocation and
the board of directors met to consider, and voted to approve, the restructuring
transactions, including the recommended allocation of common stock of CBOT
Holdings among members in respect of their memberships. The September 24, 2001
opinion was also addressed to our board. For more information, see "--
Background of the Restructuring Transactions--Development of the Restructuring
Strategy."
The September 24, 2001 opinion, which was substantially similar to
William Blair's January 16, 2001 and November 21, 2000 opinions, stated that,
based upon and subject to the matters set forth in the opinion, the allocation
to members of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings in respect of their
memberships in
59
connection with the restructuring transactions in the ratio of 5.0 : 1.0 : 0.5
: 0.06 : 0.07 to each Full Member and Associate Member, and each holder of a
GIM, IDEM and COM, respectively, is fair, from a financial point of view, to
each of the five classes of members. William Blair's November 21, 2000 and
January 16, 2001 opinions had stated, with similar qualifications, that an
allocation in the same ratio of common stock of the then proposed stock, for-
profit corporation would be fair, from a financial point of view, to each of
the five classes of members. William Blair's May 5, 2000 opinion had stated,
also with similar qualifications, that an allocation in the same ratio of
common stock of the then proposed stock, for-profit corporation and the
electronic trading company would be fair, from a financial point of view, to
each of the five classes of members. The full text of the September 24, 2001
opinion is attached as Appendix D-1 to this document and describes the
assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the scope of the review
undertaken, by William Blair. We urge you to read the opinion carefully and in
its entirety before voting on the restructuring transactions.
William Blair's opinions address only the fairness, from a financial point
of view, to each class of the members of the allocation of shares of common
stock of CBOT Holdings among the members in respect of their memberships in
connection with the restructuring transactions. The fairness of the
consideration to be received by the limited partners of Ceres in exchange for
their limited partnership interests pursuant to the Ceres merger is beyond the
scope of William Blair's opinions. For information regarding the Arthur
Andersen fairness opinion, which addresses such matters, see "--Opinion of
Arthur Andersen to the Board of Directors Regarding Fairness of the Ceres
Merger." William Blair's opinions do not address the merits of our underlying
decision to engage in the restructuring transactions or the fairness of the
consideration to be received by the members in respect of memberships in the
restructuring transactions, and do not constitute a recommendation to any
member as to how you should vote with respect to the restructuring
transactions. See "Risk Factors--Risks Relating to the Restructuring
Transactions--We Have Not Determined or Received Any Opinion Regarding the
Value of the CBOT Before or After the Restructuring Transactions or the Value
of the Securities You Will Receive in the Restructuring Transactions Compared
to the Value of the Memberships You Currently Own."
In rendering each of its opinions, William Blair assumed and relied, without
independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of all the
information examined by or otherwise reviewed or discussed with it for purposes
of the opinion. William Blair did not make or obtain an independent valuation
or appraisal of our assets, liabilities or solvency. Each opinion is based upon
economic, market, financial and other conditions existing on, and other
information disclosed to William Blair, as of the date of the opinion. Although
subsequent developments may affect an opinion, William Blair does not have any
obligation to update, revise, reaffirm or reissue such opinion except when
requested as provided in the letter agreement between William Blair and the
CBOT, dated September 7, 2001.
In connection with its review of the restructuring transactions and the
preparation of the opinions, William Blair examined, among other things:
. certain descriptive information regarding the restructuring transactions;
. various organizational documents of the CBOT and Ceres, including the
CBOT's certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations and
the Ceres limited partnership agreement;
. various trading and financial statistics for the CBOT;
. certain publicly available information regarding terms of certain
transactions involving restructurings of exchanges comparable to the CBOT
and the allocation of value;
. presentations provided to us by our consultants and financial and legal
advisors;
. letters to the CBOT from various members regarding the restructuring
transactions; and
. information regarding the historical trading prices of memberships.
60
In connection with its opinions, William Blair also examined drafts of the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of the CBOT and CBOT Holdings relating to
the restructuring transactions and the amended and restated certificates of
incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary.
William Blair also held discussions with current and former members of our
senior management and of the various classes of members of CBOT regarding the
foregoing, considered other matters which it deemed relevant to its inquiry and
has taken into account such accepted financial and investment banking
procedures and considerations as it deemed relevant.
William Blair was also advised by the Independent Allocation Committee that,
for purposes of rendering its opinions, it could assume that the restructuring
transactions will not be effected by means of a liquidation. William Blair made
this assumption without independent legal analysis.
Furthermore, in connection with its review of the restructuring transactions
and the preparation of its opinions, William Blair assumed that:
. the restructuring would not take the form of a liquidation;
. the trading rights and privileges of each membership class, including
the Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right of Full Members, would
remain intact;
. each member would receive, in addition to an appropriate series of Class
B membership in the CBOT subsidiary and associated trading rights and
privileges, the number of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings to
which such member would be entitled per the allocation ratio in respect
of his or her membership;
. each full member would receive a Class C membership in the CBOT subsidiary,
which would represent the Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right;
. such shares and memberships would be in addition to the cash payment
received in connection with the Ceres merger, the fairness of which
transaction was beyond the purview of the Independent Allocation
Committee and the opinion of William Blair; and
. the allocation did not take into consideration any possible transaction
or business combination with any other party.
William Blair's May 5 opinion also made certain additional assumptions.
The following summarizes the principal financial analyses performed by
William Blair to arrive at the conclusions set forth in the September 24, 2001
opinion. William Blair performed similar financial analyses in arriving at its
conclusions in its May 5, 2000, November 21, 2000 and January 16, 2001
opinions. William Blair performed certain procedures, including each of the
financial analyses described below, and reviewed with the Independent
Allocation Committee the assumptions upon which such analyses were based, and
other factors. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process. The
summary set forth below does not purport to be a complete description of the
analyses performed or factors considered by William Blair in this regard.
In arriving at its conclusion, William Blair considered various
methodologies for allocating the shares of common stock in CBOT Holdings among
the members in respect of their memberships in connection with the
restructuring transactions. William Blair concluded, in its professional
judgment, that an allocation methodology that takes into account a combination
of factors rather than a single factor was appropriate, and that such
combination of factors should include, with respect to each of the five classes
of members:
. relative liquidation rights;
. relative voting rights;
. the allocation made in respect of each membership in connection with the
formation of Ceres;
. the market values of memberships; and
61
. the contract volumes for which each class of membership has been
responsible on a historical basis.
In arriving at its conclusion, William Blair attached greater importance to
liquidation rights, voting rights and the allocation made in respect of each
membership in connection with the formation of Ceres.
Relative Liquidation Rights
William Blair reviewed the liquidation rights as defined in the CBOT bylaws,
including the rules, which provide for the sharing of proceeds from dissolution
allocated to each member in the event of liquidation. In addition, William
Blair reviewed the implied per share allocation ratios, as set forth below:
Member Liquidation Implied Per Share
Class Share Per Member Allocation Ratio*
------ ---------------- -----------------
Full 1.000 6.00
Associate 0.167 1.00
GIM 0.111 0.67
IDEM 0.005 0.03
COM 0.005 0.03
--------
*Stated as a multiple of Liquidation Share Per Member for the Associate Member
class.
Relative Voting Rights
William Blair reviewed voting rights per member as set forth in the CBOT
certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations. In addition,
William Blair reviewed the implied per share allocation ratios, as set forth
below:
Member Relative Voting Rights Implied Per Share
Class Per Member Allocation Ratio*
------ ---------------------- -----------------
Full 1.000 6.00
Associate 0.167 1.00
GIM 0.000 0.00
IDEM 0.000 0.00
COM 0.000 0.00
--------
*Stated as a multiple of Relative Voting Rights Per Member for the Associate
Member class.
Allocation Made in Respect of Each Membership in Connection with the Formation
of Ceres
William Blair reviewed the allocation of profits as defined in the Ceres
limited partnership agreement for the 70% of Ceres owned by the Ceres limited
partners who are CBOT members other than the clearing members. In addition,
William Blair reviewed the implied per share allocation ratios, as set forth
below:
Allocation of Per Member Implied
Member Profits by Member Allocation of Per Share Allocation
Class Class (1) Profits (2) Ratio (3)
------ ----------------- ------------- --------------------
Full 90.29% 0.06440% 6.00
Associate 8.36% 0.01073% 1.00
GIM 0.93% 0.00537% 0.50
IDEM 0.21% 0.00032% 0.03
COM 0.21% 0.00032% 0.03
--------
(1) As defined in the Ceres limited partnership agreement. Based on member seat
count as stated in the draft dated September 17, 2001 of the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of the CBOT as follows: Full (1,402), Associate
(786), GIM (162), IDEM (642) and COM (643).
(2) Defined as Allocation of Profits by Member Class divided by the respective
member seat count.
(3) Stated as a multiple of Per Member Allocation of Profits for the Associate
Member class.
62
Market Values of Memberships
William Blair reviewed the median historical trading prices of memberships
for the one-year period ending July 21, 1999, the day before the announcement
of the formation of the Restructuring Task Force and the restructuring
initiative. In addition, William Blair reviewed the implied per share
allocation ratios, as set forth below:
Median Membership Price
(For the One Year Implied
Member Period Ending July 21, Per Share Allocation
Class 1999) Ratio*
------ ----------------------- --------------------
Full $490,000 2.49
Associate $197,000 1.00
GIM $ 89,000 0.45
IDEM $ 27,000 0.14
COM $ 55,000 0.28
--------
*Stated as a multiple of Median Membership Price for the Associate Member
class.
William Blair also considered median historical trading prices for the five-
year period ending July 21, 1999, as well as spot market prices as of September
21, 2001 for each membership class.
Contract Volumes
William Blair reviewed the contract volume traded by each membership class
as a percentage of the total contract volume traded by all membership classes.
The analysis was based on contract trading volume data for the period beginning
September 1, 1998 and ending August 31, 2001, the latest such period for which
contract trading volume data by membership class was readily available. In
addition, William Blair reviewed the implied per share allocation ratios, as
set forth below:
Percent of Total Implied
Member Contract Volume by Per Share
Class Member Class Allocation Ratio*
------ ------------------ -----------------
Full 48.15% 1.17
Associate 40.98% 1.00
GIM 0.55% 0.01
IDEM 5.19% 0.13
COM 5.13% 0.13
--------
*Stated as a multiple of Percent of Total Contract Volume by Member Class for
the Associate Member class.
The foregoing description is only a summary of the material aspects of the
financial analyses used by William Blair in connection with rendering the
opinions. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not
necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. It involves
various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of
financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular
circumstances. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the summary set forth
above, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete
view of the processes underlying William Blair's opinions. In arriving at the
opinions, William Blair considered the results of all these analyses. The
analyses were prepared solely for the purposes of William Blair providing its
opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to each of the five
classes of CBOT members, of the allocation of shares of common stock in CBOT
Holdings among the members in respect of their memberships in connection with
the restructuring transactions.
Any analysis of the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the
members, involves complex considerations and judgments. The fairness opinion
and the related presentations to the Independent Allocation Committee on May 5,
2000, November 20, 2000, January 16, 2001 and September 24, 2001 were among
many factors taken into consideration by the Independent Allocation Committee
in recommending the allocation. William Blair's opinions are for the use and
benefit of the Independent Allocation Committee and the board of directors in
their consideration of the allocation in the context of the restructuring
transactions.
63
William Blair was not requested to, and did not, participate in the
structuring of the restructuring transactions nor was it asked to consider, and
its opinions do not address, the relative merits of the restructuring
transactions as compared to any alternative business strategies that might
exist for us or the effect of any other transaction in which we might engage,
the value of the CBOT before or after completion of the restructuring
transactions, or the fairness of the consideration to be received by CBOT
members in respect of their memberships in connection with the restructuring
transactions. See "Risk Factors--Risks Relating to the Restructuring
Transactions--We Have Not Determined or Received Any Opinion Regarding the
Value of the CBOT Before or After the Restructuring Transactions or the Value
of the Securities You Will Receive in the Restructuring Transactions Compared
to the Value of the Memberships You Currently Own."
Opinion of Arthur Andersen to the Board of Directors Regarding the Fairness of
the Ceres Merger
Arthur Andersen was retained by our board of directors and the board of
directors of eCBOT to render a written opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Ceres and each class of the limited partners of
Ceres, of the consideration to be received by each Ceres limited partner in
exchange for their respective limited partnership interests pursuant to the
Ceres merger. Arthur Andersen was hired based on its qualifications and
expertise in providing financial advice to companies and its reputation as a
nationally recognized professional services firm having significant financial
advisory expertise and experience. Moreover, Arthur Andersen had already been
engaged by us in connection with preparing a valuation analysis of Ceres.
Arthur Andersen confirmed to us that its service to the two boards did not
present a conflict of interest, and disclosed that it has performed and
continues to perform various accounting and tax services for the CBOT that are
unrelated to the restructuring transactions and that Arthur Andersen has
received customary fees for rendering such services. Arthur Andersen has been
or will be paid total fees of $300,000 for the services provided in connection
with the issuance of its written opinion. No portion of Arthur Andersen's fee
was contingent upon the completion of the Ceres merger or the conclusion
reached in the opinion. We also agreed to indemnify Arthur Andersen against
potential liabilities arising out of their engagement. We note that, in the
opinion of the SEC, indemnification against liabilities under the U.S. federal
securities laws is against the public policy expressed in the Securities Act
and is, therefore, unenforceable.
Arthur Andersen provided its written opinion to the two boards of directors
by letter dated January 16, 2001. As a result of certain refinements to the
revised restructuring transactions, Arthur Andersen provided an updated written
opinion to the two boards of directors by a letter dated October 2, 2001. The
opinion of Arthur Andersen stated that, based upon and subject to the following
assumptions and limitations, including the various assumptions and limitations
set forth in the opinion, the consideration to be received by each limited
partner of Ceres in exchange for their respective limited partnership interests
pursuant to the Ceres merger, is fair, from a financial point of view, to Ceres
and each class of its limited partners, as of the date of the opinion.
Arthur Andersen has agreed to reaffirm its opinion at or about the times at
which:
. the board approves the Ceres merger;
. the proxy statement and prospectus relating to the restructuring
transactions is disseminated to the membership in connection with the
special meeting for the purpose of voting on the restructuring
transactions; and
. the Ceres merger is completed.
The full text of the Arthur Andersen fairness opinion is attached as
Appendix D-2 to this document. We encourage you to read carefully the full text
of that opinion, including the description of the assumptions made, matters
considered, and limits on the scope of the review and analysis undertaken by
Arthur Andersen, before voting on the restructuring transactions.
As noted above, the CBOT currently anticipates receiving a reaffirmation of
the Arthur Andersen fairness opinion at or about the time of the completion of
the Ceres merger. Upon receipt, such opinion will be made available for
inspection and copying during regular business hours at our principal executive
offices located at
64
141 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, by any CBOT member or
Ceres limited partner or his or her representative who has been so designated
in writing.
The opinion addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the consideration to be received by each limited partner of Ceres in exchange
for their respective limited partnership interests pursuant to the Ceres merger
to Ceres and each class of the limited partners of Ceres. Arthur Andersen has
not acted as financial advisor to Ceres, eCBOT or the CBOT in connection with
the Ceres merger, other than in connection with rendering its fairness opinion
and in connection with estimating the fair market value of Ceres and the
limited partnership interests as described below under "--Ceres Valuation
Analysis of Arthur Andersen" to assist us in determining the terms of and
effecting the Ceres merger. Additionally, Arthur Andersen has not been
authorized to, and has not solicited, alternative offers for Ceres or its
assets, and Arthur Andersen has not investigated any other alternative
transactions that may be available to Ceres and its partners. In addition, the
opinion of Arthur Andersen does not address nor shall it be construed to
address the underlying business decision to effect the Ceres merger. Their
opinion letter does not constitute a recommendation to any partner or member
with respect to whether to vote in favor of the restructuring transactions or
take any other action in connection with the Ceres merger or otherwise, and
should not be relied upon by any partner or member as such.
In the review and analysis prepared to formulate an opinion, Arthur Andersen
has assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the
financial and other information provided to them by management or publicly
available to them, and Arthur Andersen does not assume any responsibility for
the independent verification of such information. Arthur Andersen further
relied upon the assurances of management of Ceres, eCBOT and the CBOT, to the
effect that the management of each such entity is unaware of any facts that
would make the information they provided to Arthur Andersen incomplete or
misleading in any respect. Arthur Andersen also assumed that the information
received from the management of each of Ceres, eCBOT and/or the CBOT was
prepared in good faith and on a basis reflecting the best currently available
judgments and estimates of management. Arthur Andersen did not prepare an
independent evaluation of the software, systems architecture, network
capability, etc. of the technology assets held by Ceres, and Arthur Andersen
was not requested to, and did not, express any view whatever as to the federal,
state or local tax consequences of the Ceres merger.
The services Arthur Andersen rendered to our board of directors and the
board of directors of eCBOT in connection with the restructuring transactions
were comprised solely of financial advisory services for the purpose of
rendering its opinion as to fairness as described above and the valuation of
Ceres as described below and did not include any accounting, audit, legal or
tax services. Without limiting the foregoing, the services provided by Arthur
Andersen with respect to the Ceres merger do not constitute, nor should they be
construed to constitute in any way, a review or audit of, or any other
procedures with respect to, any financial information, nor should such services
be relied upon by any person to disclose weaknesses in internal controls,
financial statement errors or irregularities, or illegal acts or omissions of
any person affiliated with the Ceres merger. The opinion is also necessarily
based on prevailing economic and market conditions and other circumstances as
they exist and can be evaluated on the date thereof. Arthur Andersen is under
no obligation to update or revise the opinion for events occurring after the
date of the opinion except as otherwise described herein.
The opinion of Arthur Andersen was prepared solely for the benefit and use
of our board of directors and the board of directors of eCBOT in their
consideration of the terms of the Ceres merger in connection with their review
and consideration of the restructuring transactions and, such opinion may not
be relied upon by any other person, used for any other purpose or reproduced,
disseminated, quoted or referred to at any time, in any manner or for any
purpose without Arthur Andersen's prior written consent, with the exception of
the inclusion of the opinion in this document.
65
In connection with their analysis, Arthur Andersen performed such
investigations and analyses as it considered appropriate. Among other items
considered, it:
. read current and historical financial information including Ceres
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position year-to-date for the period
ended June 30, 2001 (unaudited), Ceres and CBOT Consolidated Financial
Statements for the years ended December 31, 1999 and December 31, 2000
(unaudited), Ceres Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended
December 31, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 (audited), CBOT
Annual Reports for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,
1999 and 2000 including financial statements (audited), Ceres monthly
reports of revenues and expenses for each month of fiscal year 2000
(unaudited) and January through June of 2001 (unaudited), Summary of
Obligation and Payments to DBS Group for the Eurex software as of October
31, 2000 (unaudited);
. read certain publicly available business and financial information
relating to Ceres and the CBOT including press releases and public
information extracted from the CBOT's website;
. read certain internal financial and operating information provided by
management, including Member Trading Volume for various Quarters Ending
March 31, 1999 through March 31, 2001 and Trailing Five-Quarter Average
for Class B partners, Volume Report: CBOT Exchange Fees System, various
Ceres CTI Volume Report for Agriculture and Financials by firm number
sequence for year-to-date through June 30, 2001, Ceres Class B Units for
the year ended Decmebr 31, 2000, CBOT Class B Capital Balance Summary;
. held meetings and discussions with management and senior personnel to
discuss the business, operations, assets, historical financial results
and future prospects of the combined company including Jill Harley, Vice
President/Treasurer Accounting and Finance Department; Glen Johnson,
Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer; Terry Livingston,
Associate General Counsel/Legal; and James Amaral, Vice President of
Information Systems/Chief Investment Officer;
. considered the investment in technology made by Ceres to establish an
electronic trading system for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1997,
1998, 1999, 2000 and year-to-date through June 30, 2001;
. performed a discounted cash flow analysis of potential income generating
scenarios for Ceres based upon independent research;
. read various agreements related to Ceres, the CBOT, a/c/e, and Eurex from
a financial point of view including the Ceres Trading Limited Partnership
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as of
September 8, 1997, the Amended and Restated CBOT/Ceres License Agreement
dated May 15, 1998, the Electronic Trading Division Expense Agreement for
CBOT/Ceres dated May 29, 1998, the Alliance Agreement among the CBOT,
Ceres, Deutsche Borse, Swiss Stock Exchange, Eurex Zurich, Eurex
Frankfurt, and Eurex Deutschland dated October 1, 1999, the Software
License Agreement among CBOT, Ceres, Deutsche Borse, and Swiss Stock
Exchange dated October 1, 1999, the December 31, 1999 Unanimous Written
Consent of the Supervisory Board of CBOT/Eurex Alliance, LLC, the Interim
Agreement for Ceres, JV, and DBS dated January 15, 2000, the July 27,
2000 Confirmation of Rights Agreement, the July 19, 2000 Market
Supervision Services Agreement, the Master Software Development
Agreement, the Systems Operations Agreement between the Eurex Group, the
CBOT, CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C. and certain related entities and
Supporting Documents;
. considered the financial terms of certain recent business combination
transactions in the securities and futures exchange industry; and
. conducted such other studies, analyses, inquiries and investigations as
it deemed appropriate.
The following discussion summarizes the principal financial analyses and
procedures performed by Arthur Andersen to arrive at its conclusions set forth
in the opinion. This discussion is a summary that does not purport to be a
complete description of the analyses performed or factors considered by Arthur
Andersen in arriving at its opinion.
66
In arriving at its conclusions, Arthur Andersen considered various
methodologies and analyses to assess the value of Ceres and its partnership
interests.
In developing its methodology to assess the value of Ceres and each class of
partnership interest, Arthur Andersen considered a broad scope of information,
both internal and external to Ceres, considered various approaches to
estimating value, prepared independent analyses and reviewed appropriate
documents including the Ceres Trading Limited Partnership Second Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated September 8, 1997. Arthur
Andersen did not make any assessment of the contractual or legal rights
regarding distributions to partners; with respect to such matters, they relied
upon guidance provided by legal counsel to the CBOT. For a more detailed
discussion of these analyses, see "--Ceres Valuation Analysis of Arthur
Andersen."
The allocation of the fair market value of Ceres to its partnership
interests was prepared by Arthur Andersen based upon the ownership percentage
of each class in accordance with the Ceres Second Amended and Restated
Agreement of the Limited Partnership, dated September 8, 1997. The Class A
limited partners' ownership was considered pro rata according to their
respective percentage interests. The Class B limited partners' ownership was
based on a weighting of 40% allocated pro rata according to their percentage
interests and 60% allocated according to their respective "Electronic Trading
System Clearing Volume" with respect to contracts traded on the CBOT.
The allocation of the fair market value of Ceres among classes of partners
was prepared as follows:
Partners Ownership
-------- ---------
General partner (eCBOT)........ 10%
Class A limited partners....... 70%
Class B limited partners....... 20%
----
Total.......................... 100%
====
The foregoing description is only a summary of the material aspects of the
financial analyses used by Arthur Andersen in connection with rendering its
opinion. You should be aware that the preparation of a fairness opinion is a
complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or
summary description. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the summary set
forth above, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create an
incomplete view of the processes underlying Arthur Andersen's opinion. In
arriving at the opinion, Arthur Andersen considered the results of all of these
analyses. The analyses were prepared solely for the use of Arthur Andersen in
its consideration of providing its opinion of the fairness, from a financial
point of view, to Ceres and each class of the Ceres limited partners of the
consideration to be received by each Ceres limited partner in exchange for
their respective limited partnership interests pursuant to the Ceres merger.
Ceres Valuation Analysis of Arthur Andersen
The CBOT board of directors retained Arthur Andersen to assist with a
valuation of Ceres and the limited partnership interests in connection with the
restructuring transactions. Arthur Andersen was hired based on its
qualifications and expertise in providing financial advice to companies and its
reputation as a nationally recognized professional services firm having
significant financial advisory expertise and experience. Arthur Andersen
confirmed to us that its service did not present a conflict of interest, and
disclosed that it has performed and continues to perform various accounting and
tax services for the CBOT that are unrelated to the restructuring transactions
and that Arthur Andersen has received customary fees for rendering such
services. Arthur Andersen has been or will be paid total fees of less than
$100,000 in connection with the valuation analysis. No portion of Arthur
Andersen's fee was contingent upon the completion of the Ceres merger or the
conclusion reached in the analysis. We also agreed to indemnify Arthur Andersen
against potential liabilities arising out of their engagement. We note that, in
the opinion of the SEC, indemnification against liabilities
67
under the U.S. federal securities laws is against the public policy expressed
in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
The final valuation analysis of Ceres, which will be provided to us as of a
date reasonably proximate to the date of the completion of the Ceres merger,
will provide the basis for the amount of cash payment that will be distributed
as merger consideration and the allocation of such merger consideration among
the Ceres limited partners in the Ceres merger. As of the date of this
document, Arthur Andersen has developed its valuation methodology and has
provided the board of directors with a preliminary valuation analysis of Ceres
in connection with its consideration of the restructuring transactions. The
full text of the preliminary Ceres valuation analysis is attached as Appendix
D-3 to this document. Upon receipt, Arthur Andersen's final valuation report,
to be dated as of a date reasonably proximate to the date of the completion of
the Ceres merger, will be made available for inspection and copying during
regular business hours at our principal executive offices located at 141 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, by any CBOT member or Ceres limited
partner or his or her representative who has been so designated in writing.
In connection with its valuation analysis, Arthur Andersen considered a
broad scope of information, both internal and external to Ceres, considered
various approaches to estimating value, prepared independent analyses and
considered appropriate documents including the Ceres Trading Limited
Partnership Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated
as of September 8, 1997. The basis of value utilized in Arthur Andersen's
valuation methodology is fair market value, which it defines as the amount at
which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller
when neither is acting under compulsion and when both have reasonable knowledge
of the relevant facts. Arthur Andersen considered various valuation approaches,
including an income approach, market approach and net asset approach. Set forth
below is a brief description of each approach.
Income Approach. The income approach measures the value of an entity by the
present value of its future economic benefits. Value indications are developed
by discounting expected cash flows to their present value at a rate of return
that incorporates the time value of funds and the risks associated with the
particular investment. The discount rate selected is based on rates of return
available from alternative investments of similar type and quality as of the
valuation date.
Market Approach. The market approach measures the value of an entity through
an analysis of recent transactions or offerings of comparative entities. These
entities may be companies whose stock is actively traded or private companies
acquired in transactions for which the terms are known to us. Consideration is
given to the financial condition and operating performance of the entity being
appraised relative to those of the selected guideline companies operating in
the same or a similar line of business, and which are potentially subject to
corresponding economic, environmental, and political factors. The guideline
companies would be considered reasonable investment alternatives.
Cost or Net Asset Approach. The cost or net asset approach measures the
value of an entity by the net aggregate fair market value of the entity's
underlying assets. Application of this approach entails a restatement of the
balance sheet of the enterprise, substituting the fair market value of its
assets and liabilities for their recorded values as stated on their financial
statements. This approach is frequently used in valuing holding companies or
capital intensive firms.
Arthur Andersen considered the three approaches described above and
concluded that the fair market value of Ceres is best determined by the net
asset approach. As of the date of the valuation described herein, the assets of
the limited partnership interest of Ceres consisted of its interest in the
a/c/e system and in CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C. and its various licensing
agreements related to electronic trading support for the CBOT.
68
In arriving at its conclusions, Arthur Andersen made the following
assumptions:
. The CBOT transitioned from the Project A platform to the a/c/e system on
or about August 27, 2000.
. The a/c/e system is deemed to be state-of-the-art by the CBOT and the
Project A platform, as a local-area network platform, was no longer
competitive. Therefore, the a/c/e system is valuable and the Project A
platform is obsolete.
. Except for order routing software to be financed and owned by the CBOT,
Ceres owns the rights to the a/c/e system software pursuant to its
alliance arrangements with Deutsche Borse AG and the Swiss Stock
Exchange.
. Ceres has, both directly and indirectly, in accordance with its 50
percent ownership in CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C., incurred costs
associated with certain a/c/e system modifications and, through June 30,
2001, these expenditures totaled $47,011,080. Additionally, purchases of
computer software and systems related to the a/c/e system in the amount
of $43,650,446 were capitalized by Ceres, as of June 30, 2001.
. The CBOT intends to reorganize and consolidate its electronic trading
business into its wholly owned eCBOT subsidiary in connection with the
restructuring transactions. As a result, it would be necessary for the
CBOT subsidiary to acquire, directly or indirectly, all limited
partnership interests in Ceres not owned by eCBOT.
. The Ceres limited partnership agreement provides that eCBOT, as general
partner, may dissolve Ceres at will.
. The Ceres limited partnership agreement states that, upon dissolution of
Ceres, the assets of Ceres shall be liquidated and the proceeds shall be
distributed to the partners of Ceres in accordance with their capital
accounts and the balance, if any, in accordance with their percentage
interests.
In addition, Arthur Andersen considered that rights to the use of the a/c/e
system and the a/c/e system modifications could conceivably provide Ceres with
the ability to provide electronic trading capabilities to other exchanges.
Under this scenario, it is feasible that Ceres' economic profile would be
similar to that of its current operations, i.e., receiving fees for electronic
trades, etc., or that it could license the software for use with other
exchanges for royalty payments. However, Arthur Andersen concluded that the
economics under such scenarios are highly uncertain due to the speculative
nature of the fees achievable in an increasingly competitive environment and
the operating costs associated with continued maintenance of the system.
Additionally, given the ability of eCBOT, as the general partner of Ceres, to
unilaterally liquidate the business, Arthur Andersen concluded that the
probability of such a scenario is extremely low.
Based on the foregoing, Arthur Andersen's valuation of Ceres as of June 30,
2001 was:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents...................................... $ 106,542
Accounts receivable............................................ 3,415,942
Capital contributions receivable............................... 0
Prepaid expenses............................................... 0
Deferred organization and development costs.................... 0
Computer software and systems--net............................. 34,204,090
Investment in and advances to CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C....... 500,000
Previously incurred Eurex-related expenses (1)................. 47,011,080
-----------
Total assets................................................... $85,237,654
===========
69
Liabilities and Partners' Equity:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses........................ $ 201,181
Due to CBOT/Eurex Alliance L.L.C............................. 5,480,370
Notes payable................................................ 7,716,172
Advances from general partner................................ 46,472,922
Partners' equity............................................. 25,367,009
-----------
Total liabilities and partners' equity....................... $85,237,654
===========
Concluded value of partnership (rounded)..................... $25,400,000
===========
--------
(1) Previously Incurred, Non-Capitalized Eurex-Related Development & Operating
Loss Expenses:
Fiscal year 1998............. $10,874,753
Fiscal year 1999............. 11,024,878
Fiscal year 2000............. 17,550,433
Fiscal year 2001............. 7,561,016
-----------
Total........................ $47,011,080
===========
Stock Exchange Listing
We currently have no plans to list the common stock of CBOT Holdings on any
stock exchange.
We may, in the future, apply to list the common stock of CBOT Holdings on a
stock exchange. However, we cannot provide any assurances in this regard.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
We are seeking a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service to the effect
that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, you will not recognize any gain or
loss strictly as a result of receiving shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings
and Class A, Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary or as a
result of CBOT Holdings receiving a Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary
in connection with the restructuring transactions. We currently expect to file
a request for such a ruling from the IRS in the near future. Receipt of a
favorable ruling from the IRS with respect to the receipt by members of Class B
and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary and receipt of a favorable
ruling from the IRS or an opinion of counsel with respect to the receipt by
CBOT Holdings of a Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary and receipt by
members of common stock in CBOT Holdings, in each case in form and substance
satisfactory to our board, are conditions to our obligation to complete the
restructuring transactions.
Based upon our understanding of the position of the IRS with respect to
other exchanges involved in the process of demutualization and the opinion of
our counsel as described elsewhere in this document:
. you will not recognize gain or loss as a result of your receipt of shares
of common stock of CBOT Holdings and Class B and Class C memberships in
the CBOT subsidiary or as a result of the receipt by CBOT Holdings of the
Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary;
. assuming this non-recognition treatment, the aggregate basis in your
current membership will carry over to your common stock of CBOT Holdings
and Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary;
. the holding period of the common stock of CBOT Holdings and Class B and
Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary received by you will include
the period for which you held your current membership, provided that you
held your membership as a capital asset or property as described in Code
Section 1231 on the date of the distribution of the common stock of CBOT
Holdings and Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary; and
. we will not recognize any gain or loss upon our demutualization.
70
We anticipate that the receipt of cash payments by the limited partners of
Ceres pursuant to the reorganization of our electronic trading business will be
taxable to such limited partners.
For more information, including the opinion of our counsel on these matters,
see "Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Restructuring
Transactions."
Absence of Appraisal Rights
Members who object to the restructuring transactions will have no statutory
appraisal or dissenters rights under applicable law. Appraisal or dissenters
rights, if available, would have enabled members to demand payment of the fair
value of their memberships in cash rather than accept the consideration to be
received as a result of the restructuring transactions. Under Delaware law,
these rights generally apply to transactions involving mergers or
consolidations of stock corporations but not similar transactions involving
only nonstock corporations. The demutualization will be accomplished by a
merger of two nonstock corporations and the distribution of a dividend of
common stock of an existing stock corporation. Accordingly, if the
restructuring transactions are completed, notwithstanding the fact that you may
vote against the restructuring transactions, you will become entitled to shares
of common stock of CBOT Holdings, a Class B membership in the CBOT subsidiary
and, to the extent you are a Full Member, a Class C membership in the CBOT
subsidiary, as described in this document.
Accounting Matters
The accounting treatment of certain aspects of the restructuring
transactions will be treated similar to a reorganization of entities under
common control. Under this method of accounting, no gain or loss will be
recognized, and the assets and liabilities of CBOT will appear on the books of
CBOT Holdings at their same recorded amounts.
Regulatory Matters
In addition to those conditions described below in "--Conditions to
Completing the Restructuring Transactions," our obligation to complete the
restructuring transactions is subject to:
. receipt of any approvals required by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission in connection with the proposed changes to our certificate of
incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations that will be made in
connection with the restructuring transactions; and
. receipt of confirmation by the CFTC that implementation of the
restructuring transactions will not have a material adverse effect on our
contract market designation.
These approvals from the CFTC will be sought as soon as reasonably practicable
following membership approval of the restructuring transactions at the special
meeting of members. Although we currently expect to receive these approvals
from the CFTC, we can provide no assurance as to when or whether we will
receive such approvals.
Also, the restructuring transactions may be subject to certain regulatory
requirements of other state, federal and foreign governmental agencies and
authorities, including those relating to the regulation of securities. We are
currently working to evaluate and comply in all material respects with these
requirements and do not anticipate that they will hinder, delay or restrict
completion of the restructuring transactions. In connection with our compliance
with these regulatory requirements, we currently expect that we may be required
to utilize a registered broker-dealer in certain jurisdictions to assist us
with certain aspects of the membership vote relating to, and other matters
regarding, the restructuring transactions. We may adopt other special
procedures in connection with these compliance efforts.
No filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976,
as amended, are required in connection with the restructuring transactions
generally. However, if any member acquires enough securities in
71
connection with the restructuring transactions to exceed any threshold stated
in the regulations under this act, and if an exemption under those regulations
does not apply, such member and the CBOT could be required to make filings
under this act, and the waiting period under the act would have to expire or be
terminated before any issuance of shares to such member could be effected. A
filing requirement could delay the distribution of shares to such member for
several months or more.
Conditions to Completing the Restructuring Transactions
We will not be obligated to complete the restructuring transactions unless
and until each of the following conditions has been satisfied:
. the members of the CBOT shall have approved each of the three
propositions being submitted for their approval in connection with the
restructuring transactions in accordance with our certificate of
incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations and applicable law;
. we shall have received a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service that the receipt by members of Class B and Class C memberships in
the CBOT subsidiary and a favorable ruling from the IRS or an opinion of
counsel that receipt by CBOT Holdings of a Class A membership in the CBOT
subsidiary and receipt by members of common stock of CBOT Holdings, in
each case, in form satisfactory to our board of directors, will not
result in the recognition of gain to our members under U.S. federal tax
law;
. we shall have received any approvals required by the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission in connection with the changes to our certificate of
incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations that will be made in
connection with the restructuring transactions and we shall have received
confirmation from the CFTC that implementation of the restructuring
transactions will not have a material adverse effect on the CBOT's
contract market designation, and we shall have received any other
governmental or regulatory approvals and authorizations determined by us
to be necessary or appropriate;
. we shall have received each required material third party consent, which
the failure to obtain would, in the sole and absolute determination of
the board of directors, have a material adverse effect on CBOT Holdings
or the CBOT subsidiary;
. there shall be no court order or administrative or other regulation or
similar decree prohibiting or restricting the completion of the
restructuring transactions; and
. our board of directors shall not have determined that the restructuring
transactions are no longer in the best interests of the CBOT and its
members or that the restructuring transactions are not fair to each class
of CBOT membership.
In making this determination, our board of directors will give due
consideration to all relevant facts and circumstances, including, among
other things, any update, confirmation or reaffirmation of the fairness
opinions received by the board in connection with the restructuring
transactions, including both the fairness opinion from William Blair
relating to the allocation of the shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings
among members and the fairness opinion from Arthur Andersen relating to
the cash payment to be distributed as merger consideration among Ceres
limited partners, the then current status of any litigation relating to
the restructuring transactions and the expected effects, if any, of the
restructuring transactions on the Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise
right.
We currently expect to complete the restructuring transactions as soon as
reasonably practicable following the satisfaction of these conditions.
Board Recommendation
Our board of directors has determined that the restructuring transactions
are in the best interests of the CBOT and its members and that the
restructuring transactions are fair to each class of CBOT membership. The board
of directors has approved the restructuring transactions and recommends that
members vote "FOR" approval of the restructuring transactions. In particular,
our board recommends that you vote "FOR" approval of each of the three
propositions relating to the restructuring transactions being submitted for
your approval. Unless all three of these propositions are approved, the
restructuring transactions will not have been approved by the members and,
accordingly, will not be completed.
72
CAPITALIZATION
We set forth below the historical capitalization of the CBOT and a pro forma
capitalization of CBOT Holdings giving effect to the restructuring
transactions. This information should be read in conjunction with "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," the
historical consolidated financial statements of the CBOT included in this
document as Appendix A and the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements of CBOT Holdings included in this document as Appendix B.
As of June 30, 2001
-----------------------------------------
Pro Forma After Effects of
--------------------------
Issuance
of Acquisition of
Common Interest in
Actual Stock(1) Ceres(2)
-------- -------- --------------
(In thousands)
Long-term debt.......................... $ 59,976 $ 59,976 $ 79,976
-------- -------- --------
Members' equity:
Members' equity....................... 198,112 -- --
Accumulated other comprehensive loss.. (56) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Total members' equity............... 198,056 -- --
-------- -------- --------
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value,
10,000,000 shares authorized, none
issued and outstanding............... -- -- --
Common stock, $0.001 par value,
100,000,000 shares authorized,
39,802,650 shares issued and
outstanding.......................... -- 40 40
Additional paid-in capital............ -- 198,072 175,212
Accumulated other comprehensive loss.. -- (56) (56)
-------- -------- --------
Total stockholders' equity.......... -- 198,056 175,196
-------- -------- --------
Total capitalization................ $258,032 $258,032 $255,172
======== ======== ========
--------
(1) Pro forma data reflects such adjustments as necessary, in the opinion of
management, to reflect the conversion of members' equity to common stock of
CBOT Holdings.
(2) Pro forma data reflects such adjustments as necessary, in the opinion of
management, to reflect the payment in cash of $22,860,000 of which
$20,000,000 would be borrowed, to the limited partners of Ceres in exchange
for their limited partnership interests based on the June 30, 2001
valuation of Ceres.
73
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial and other
data for the CBOT. The balance sheet data as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and
operating data for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 have been
derived from the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this document. The balance sheet data as of December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996 and operating data for the years ended December 31, 1997
and 1996 have been derived from the audited financial statements and related
notes not included in this document. The balance sheet and operating data as
of, and for each of, the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 are unaudited
but include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of
normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of such
data. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.
The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations," the consolidated financial statements and related notes, the
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements and other
financial information included elsewhere in this document.
Six Months
Ended June 30, Year Ended December 31,
----------------- ------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating Data (dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Revenues
Exchange fees.......... $ 63,316 $ 54,454 $101,981 $102,545 $112,115 $ 88,932 $ 76,565
Market data (1)........ 32,102 29,330 61,060 54,028 53,100 47,242 44,459
Building (2)........... 12,589 12,717 24,530 22,653 21,876 21,896 21,117
Services (3)........... 6,401 9,638 17,848 20,279 16,907 15,776 10,976
Other (4).............. 5,164 1,601 7,500 3,391 1,240 1,539 1,461
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues....... 119,572 107,740 212,919 202,896 205,238 175,385 154,578
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Expenses:
Salaries and benefits.. 29,845 30,723 56,391 64,133 57,991 49,384 46,064
General and
administrative
expenses.............. 28,691 21,802 52,299 50,988 45,267 28,174 20,295
Building operating
costs................. 11,738 12,135 22,584 23,171 22,572 21,023 18,763
Depreciation and
amortization.......... 21,984 18,181 40,013 36,140 33,764 27,681 16,433
Programs (5)........... 931 1,578 3,539 7,280 8,802 9,974 9,305
Professional services.. 10,039 14,491 32,459 32,490 19,924 11,950 12,948
Other (6).............. 2,000 8,330 8,261 327 -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total expenses....... 105,228 107,240 215,546 214,529 188,320 148,186 123,808
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from
operations.......... 14,344 500 (2,627) (11,633) 16,918 27,199 30,770
Other income and
expenses
Interest income........ 589 671 1,242 1,052 1,947 2,090 1,986
Interest expense....... 3,359 2,721 6,773 6,774 7,170 6,483 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before
income taxes and
cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle........... 11,574 (1,550) (8,158) (17,355) 11,695 22,806 32,756
Provision (benefit) for
income taxes........... 4,927 1,406 1,950 (2,895) 5,051 6,147 13,109
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before
cumulative effect of
changes in accounting
principle............. 6,647 (2,956) (10,108) (14,460) 6,644 16,659 19,647
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle--net of tax
of $36(7) and
$2,026(8),
respectively........... 51 -- -- 2,920 -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before
minority interest..... 6,596 (2,956) (10,108) (17,380) 6,644 16,659 19,647
Minority interest in
(income) loss of
subsidiaries........... -- -- -- 6,933 (38) (6,995) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)...... $ 6,596 $ (2,956) $(10,108) $(10,447) $ 6,606 $ 9,664 $ 19,647
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
74
Six Months Ended
June 30, Year Ended December 31,
--------------------- ----------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Balance Sheet Data
Total assets............ $361,650 $364,290 $372,194 $373,379 $400,971 $397,449 $355,585
Total liabilities....... 163,594 166,098 180,874 172,405 189,924 193,538 160,765
Short-term borrowings... 21,538 23,214 27,296 6,500 -- 1,662 14,357
Long-term debt.......... 59,976 64,286 64,286 87,500 100,726 105,000 76,166
Total equity............ 198,056 198,192 191,320 200,974 211,047 203,911 194,820
Proforma Data (9)
Total assets............ $358,790 $364,290 $372,194 $373,379 $400,971 $397,449 $355,585
Total liabilities....... 183,594 166,098 180,874 172,405 189,924 193,538 160,765
Short-term borrowings... 21,538 23,214 27,296 6,500 -- 1,662 14,357
Long-term debt.......... 79,976 64,286 64,286 87,500 100,726 105,000 76,166
Total equity............ 175,196 198,192 191,320 200,974 211,047 203,911 194,820
Net income (loss)....... 6,596 (2,956) (10,108) (10,447) 6,606 9,664 19,647
Net income (loss) per
share(10).............. 0.17 (0.07) (0.25) (0.26) 0.17 0.24 0.49
Other Data
Current ratio(11)....... 0.80 0.64 0.68 1.02 1.41 1.42 1.15
Working capital
(deficit).............. $(13,771) $(22,742) $(24,149) $ 1,067 $ 18,574 $ 18,457 $ 7,729
Capital expenditures.... 9,720 15,847 38,497 25,165 26,985 48,529 90,393
Times interest earned
(12)................... 4.45 N/A N/A N/A 2.63 4.52 N/A
Number of full time
employees at end of
period................. 700 758 711 846 853 805 811
Sales price per full
CBOT membership--High.. $ 350 $ 642 $ 642 $ 632 $ 780 $ 857 $ 690
Low..................... 290 410 255 400 384 660 531
--------
(1) Beginning in 2000, the CBOT repriced the distribution of quotation data. At
the same time, the CBOT introduced a rebate to member firms for quotations.
This rebate is offset against quotation revenue.
(2) Building revenue consists of rental payments from tenants for leased space
in buildings owned by the CBOT.
(3) Services revenue consists of those charges for telecommunications, member
services-related fees, workstation fees, exchange floor services and other
services.
(4) Other revenues consist of members' dues, fines and other miscellaneous
items. Members' dues consist of dues on both CBOT and MidAmerica Commodity
Exchange memberships. Dues on CBOT memberships were waived from 1989
through May 2000.
(5) Programs include costs primarily related to marketing and communication
programs.
(6) Other expense includes severance expenses as well as a one-time contract
settlement in 2000.
(7) In 2001, the CBOT adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities," as amended and interpreted, requiring recognition of all
derivative instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition as either assets or liabilities and the measurement of those
instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 133 also requires changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments to be recorded each period in current
earnings or other comprehensive income depending on the intended use of the
derivatives.
(8) In 1999, the CBOT adopted Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-5, "Reporting on
the Costs of Start-Up Activities." SOP 98-5 requires that start-up
activities be expensed as incurred. Previously, start-up activities were
capitalized and amortized.
(9) Reflects the conversion of members' equity to common stock of CBOT
Holdings.
(10) Based on 39,802,650 shares issued and outstanding immediately following
completion of the restructuring transactions.
(11) Equals current assets divided by current liabilities.
(12) Equals the sum of income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle and provision (benefit) for income taxes plus
interest expense divided by interest expense.
75
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This document contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including the risks and uncertainties faced by us described below and elsewhere
in this document, including under "Risk Factors" above.
The following should be read in conjunction with our financial statements
appearing in the appendices to this document. As discussed in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements, subsequent to the issuance of CBOT's
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999,
management determined that Ceres should have been accounted for as a
consolidated subsidiary rather than under the equity method of accounting. This
determination was made based on a reassessment of the rights of the limited
partners of Ceres and a determination that such limited partners do not have
rights which allow them to participate in the management of Ceres or rights
that limit the CBOT's ability to control the operations of Ceres. As required
by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, the accompanying 1999 and 1998
consolidated financial statements have been restated to correct the error in
accounting for Ceres and to present Ceres as a consolidated subsidiary of the
CBOT. The accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations is based on the restated consolidated
financial statements.
Overview
Our primary business is the operation of markets for the trading of listed
financial and commodity futures contracts and options on futures contracts. In
addition to our traditional open outcry auction markets, we offer electronic
trading through the a/c/e system, which we jointly own and operate through our
alliance with the Eurex Group. We derive revenue from exchange fees relating to
the trading in our markets, which accounted for about 47.9% of our total
revenues in 2000. In order to increase our volume and resulting revenues, we
seek to develop and promote contracts designed to satisfy the trading, hedging
and risk-management needs of our market participants.
Because our trading fees are assessed on a per-transaction basis, our
trading revenues are directly correlated to the volume of contracts traded on
our markets. Many factors may affect our trading volume, including fluctuations
in interest rate volatility, growth in equity trading, the general domestic
business cycle, changes in weather and farming conditions and changes in the
debt management policy of the United States government. Recently, our trading
revenues have been affected by the reduced volume of trading.
In addition to trading fees, we also derive revenue from the sale of our
market data. Because we are the primary market for our products, our price
information has value as a key indicator of the overall financial and
agricultural markets. To some extent, revenues from the sales of our market
data are also dependent upon volume, as well as our ability to remain a primary
market and to respond to innovations in technology that may affect the
availability and price of market data. These revenues may also be subject to
legislative and regulatory changes. Sales of market data accounted for about
28.7% of our total revenue in 2000.
The expenses relating to our trading operations are mostly fixed expenses,
which means that our overall expense structure is generally independent of our
trading volume. Salaries and benefits represent our largest expense category
and are mostly dependent upon our staffing requirements and the overall
employment market. Professional services expenses have increased in recent
years primarily due to expenses associated with making our computer systems
year 2000 compliant, enhancements to our trading systems and development of the
restructuring transactions described in this document.
We also rent out commercial space in the buildings that we own. In 2000,
total revenues from our real estate operations represented about 11.5% of our
total revenues. These revenues are generally affected by market rental rates,
lease renewals and business conditions in the financial services industry in
which most of our tenants operate. Building expenses are dependent on variable
utility costs, cleaning expenses, real estate taxes and other general operating
costs.
76
Results of Operations
Six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2000
Net Income (Loss). Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2001 was
$6.6 million compared to a net loss of $3.0 million for the comparable period
of 2000. Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle increased $13.1 million to $11.6 million in the first six
months of 2001. This increase was primarily the result of increased revenues of
$11.8 million coupled with decreased operating expenses of $2.0 million.
Revenues. Consolidated operating revenues for the six months ended June 30,
2001 were $119.6 million, an increase of $11.8 million, or 11%, from $107.7
million in the corresponding period of 2000.
Total trading volume for the first six months of 2001 was 126.7 million
contracts, a 3% decrease from 130.7 million contracts in the first six months
of 2000. Open outcry trading volume for the six months ended June 30, 2001 was
105.1 million contracts compared to 125.0 million contracts in the year earlier
period. Screen based trading volume was 21.6 million contracts in the first
half of 2001 versus 5.7 million contracts in 2000. Screen based trading
occurred on the Project A platform until August 27, 2000, when it was replaced
by the a/c/e platform. Since the launch of the a/c/e platform, the percentage
of screen based trading to total trading volume has progressively increased
from approximately 12% at the inception of a/c/e trading to an average of about
17% in the first half of 2001.
In spite of the decreased trading volume described above, revenues from
exchange fees increased about 16%, or $8.9 million, from $54.5 million in the
first six months of 2000 to $63.3 million in the same period of 2001. Exchange
fee revenue was higher due to increases in trading rates and changes in
transaction mix. Exchange fees from open outcry trading were $46.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2001, compared to $44.8 million in the similar
prior year period. The largest component of open outcry fees, non-member fees,
decreased from $36.9 million in the first half of 2000 to $30.4 million, a
decline of 18%, which was more than offset by an increase in the rate charged
to members and delegates instituted in September of 2000. Higher screen based
volume, which was offset by lower rates charged for the a/c/e/ platform,
resulted in increased revenue of $7.2 million to $16.9 million, from $9.7
million in the first six months of 2001. The increase in screen based trading
fees accounted for over 80% of the total increase in exchange fee revenue.
Market data revenues were $32.1 million in the first six months of 2001, an
increase of 9% from $29.3 million for the same period of 2000. This increase
primarily related to a $2.0 million reduction in rebates to member firms for
terminal subscriptions.
Building revenues from leased office space were $12.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2001, slightly less than the $12.7 million for the same
period of 2000. Leased space remained relatively unchanged from 2000 to 2001.
Service revenues decreased in the first six months of 2001 to $6.4 million
from $9.6 million a year earlier, primarily the result of the absence in the
current year of $3.1 million in revenue related to the former electronic
platform, Project A. Service revenues consist primarily of telephone charges,
badge fees, booth space rentals and membership application and registration
fees.
Membership dues of $4.6 million were recognized in the first six months of
2001, compared to $0.9 million in 2000. This increase was a result of the
reinstatement of dues charged to all CBOT members beginning in June of 2000.
Interest income was $0.6 million in the first six months of 2001, which was
down from the $0.7 million recorded in 2000. The decrease primarily related to
$0.2 million of interest income recorded in 2000 from a non-recurring income
tax refund. Interest expense of $3.4 million for the first six months of 2001
was higher than the $2.7 million recorded in the prior year, primarily due to
$0.3 million of interest expense recorded in 2001 associated with the
resolution of a tax audit, as well as $0.2 million of additional interest from
the note payable.
77
Expenses. Operating expenses totaled $105.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2001, compared to $107.2 million for the same period of 2000, a
decrease of $2.0 million, or about 2%.
Salaries and benefits were $29.8 million in the first six months of 2001, a
decrease of $0.9 million, or 3%, from the same period of 2000. The decrease was
due to a reduction in the number of employees from 2000 to 2001.
In the first six months of 2000, severance and contract settlement expenses
of $8.3 million were recorded related primarily to contract settlements with
former executive officers of the CBOT. Severance expenses in the first six
months of 2001 were $2.0 million and resulted from the ongoing restructuring at
the CBOT.
General and administrative expenses increased to $28.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2001, about a 32% increase from the $21.8 million
recorded in the prior year period. The increase primarily related to charges of
$1.5 million and $1.3 million for bad debt write-offs and fixed asset
retirements, respectively, in the first quarter of 2001. Costs associated with
market operations of the a/c/e platform of $2.6 million, which were not
recorded in the 2000 period, also contributed to the increase. The remainder of
general and administrative expenses, consisting of general operating costs such
as telecommunications expenses, the costs of market information data on the
trading floors and data processing expenses, accounted for about $1.5 million
of the increase.
Professional services expenses were $10.0 million, a decrease of about 31%
from $14.5 million in the year earlier period. This decrease was largely the
result of lower expenses for corporate restructuring, leased programmers and
consultants in the amounts of $4.6 million, $2.0 million and $0.8 million,
respectively. These reductions were offset somewhat by an increase in legal
expenses of $2.6 million, as the CBOT is seeking to resolve various pending
lawsuits.
Building operating costs decreased 3% to $11.7 million from $12.1 million in
the first six months of 2000, due to lower operating expenses. Program costs
decreased from $1.6 million to $0.9 million largely as a result of the
continuing change in the marketing efforts of the CBOT.
The provision for income taxes was $4.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2001, compared to $1.4 million in the year earlier period. Even though
a loss before income taxes was experienced in the first six months of 2000, a
provision for income taxes was generated due to the non-deductibility of
certain costs.
Year ended December 31, 2000 compared to year ended December 31, 1999
Net Loss. For the year ended December 31, 2000, we had a net loss of $10.1
million compared to a net loss of $10.4 million for the year ended December 31,
1999. Loss before income taxes and other items improved to $8.2 million in 2000
from $17.4 million in 1999 due to higher revenues and lower expenses. The loss
for 2000 is primarily the result of a one-time contract settlement expense
related to the termination of the employment agreement with a former president
and chief executive officer of about $8.0 million and bad debt expense of $2.1
million related to amounts receivable from one of our market data customers.
Revenues. In 2000, our consolidated operating revenues increased 4.9% to
$212.9 million compared to $202.9 million in 1999. Revenues from exchange fees
were essentially unchanged at $102.0 million compared to $102.5 million in
1999. Exchange fees can be divided into two components: exchange trading fees
and electronic trading fees. The amount of exchange fees allocable to exchange
trading was $83.8 million in 2000, compared to $83.9 million in 1999. The
largest component of exchange trading fees, non-member fees, decreased from
$68.5 million in 1999 to $65.2 million in 2000, a decline of 4.8%. The decrease
in non-member fees was partially offset by an increase in the fee rate charged
to members and delegates beginning in September 2000. The amount of exchange
fees allocable to electronic trading was $18.2 million in 2000 compared to
$18.6 million in 1999. Total trading volume declined to 233.5 million contracts
in 2000 from 254.6 million contracts in 1999. Trading volume for electronic
trading was 15.5 million contracts in 2000 and 11.2 million contracts in 1999.
78
The decreased revenue from exchange fees was partially offset by increased
revenue from the sale of market data. In 2000, the CBOT recognized $61.0
million in revenue from the sale of market data compared to $54.0 million in
1999, representing an increase of 13%. This increase was due primarily to an
increase in the price charged for certain market data.
Building revenue from leased office space at 141 West Jackson Boulevard in
Chicago also increased to $24.5 million in 2000, or 7.9% above our building
revenue in 1999. Our per square foot rental rate increased in this same period.
The amount of lease space remained steady from 1999 to 2000.
Service revenues decreased 12.3% from $20.3 million in 1999 to $17.8 million
in 2000. Service revenues consist of telephone charges, badge fees, booth space
and member services related fees. This decrease was primarily attributable to
decreased revenues from fees charged to access trading floor communication
system and the elimination of Project A terminal leasing in September 2000.
Dues received from the membership were $5.5 million in 2000, compared to
$0.4 million in 1999. This increase was a result of the reinstatement of dues
charged to all CBOT members in June 2000.
Other operating revenue for the exchange trading segment includes fines
levied on members and member firms by regulatory committees and the board of
directors based on the rules and regulations of the CBOT. Other operating
revenue was $0.8 million in 2000 compared to $1.7 million in 1999. This
decrease is due primarily to a one-time disciplinary fine levied by the board
of directors in 1999. Other operating revenue in 2000 for the electronic
trading segment of $1.2 million included gains on foreign currency transactions
of $1.0 million and consulting revenues of $0.2 million in 2000, compared to
$1.3 million of other operating revenue in 1999, which related to a favorable
settlement of a lawsuit.
Interest income, which is not a component of operating income, was $1.2
million in 2000, which represented an increase of 20% from 1999 interest income
of $1.0 million. This increase resulted from an overall increase in cash and
cash equivalents that bear interest. Offsetting the interest income was
interest expense of $6.8 million in each of 2000 and 1999. Interest expense
remained the same as in 1999 due to higher interest rates offset by a lower
debt balance in 2000.
Expenses. Operating expenses totaled $215.5 million in 2000, compared to
$214.5 million in 1999, which is an increase of 0.5%. Salaries and benefits
decreased 12.0% to $56.4 million from $64.1 million in 1999. The decrease in
salary and benefits expenses is due to reduced staffing levels relative to
1999. Salary expense decreased $2.7 million from $47.7 million in 1999 to $45.0
million in 2000. In addition, incentive compensation for employees decreased
$3.1 million from $4.2 million in 1999 to $1.1 million in 2000. Furthermore,
pension and savings plan expense decreased $1.9 million from $4.4 million in
1999 to $2.5 million in 2000.
Professional service expenses were $32.5 million in 2000, unchanged from
1999. This expense category includes the costs of restructuring, which was
about $9.9 million in 2000 compared to $1.7 million in 1999. Included in 1999,
were costs of about $8.0 million associated with making our computer systems
year 2000 compliant.
General and administrative expenses increased $1.3 million to $52.3 million
in 2000, a 2.6% increase from the $51.0 million in general and administrative
expenses in 1999. These expenses represent our general operating costs, such as
telecommunications expenses, the cost of information machines on the trading
floors and data processing expenses, totaling $18.6 million. Operating expenses
of the a/c/e system, totaling $21.4 million in 2000, the expenses associated
with the communications lines for the Project A workstations of $2.6 million,
and bad debt expense of $2.1 million, were also included in general and
administrative expenses.
Building operating expenses decreased 2.6% from $23.2 million in 1999 to
$22.6 million in 2000. Program costs decreased 52.1% from $7.3 million in 1999
to $3.5 million in 2000. These costs have decreased primarily as a result of
the change in the marketing efforts of the CBOT.
79
While the CBOT reflects a loss before income taxes, the CBOT generated a
provision for income taxes due to the non-deductibility of certain
restructuring costs.
Year ended December 31, 1999 compared to year ended December 31, 1998
Net Income/(Loss). For the year ended December 31, 1999, we had a net loss
of $10.4 million compared to net income of $6.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 1998. This operating loss was primarily the result of increased
salaries and benefits, professional services and general and administrative
expenses and the change in accounting principle.
In 1999, the CBOT adopted Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-5, Reporting on
the Costs of Start-Up Activities. Accordingly, the CBOT expensed costs
associated with start-up activities which had otherwise been capitalized and
amortized on a straight-line basis over 60 months. The cumulative effect of
this change in accounting principle was $2.9 million, net of tax benefit of
$2.0 million.
Revenues. In 1999, our consolidated operating revenues decreased 1.1% to
$202.9 million compared to $205.2 million in 1998. Revenues from exchange fees
decreased 8.6% from $112.1 million in 1998 to $102.5 million in 1999,
principally as a result of lower trading volume. In 1999, 254.6 million
contracts were traded, which represented a 9.5% decrease from the 281.2 million
contracts traded in 1998. The portion of these contracts allocable to
electronic trading was 11.2 million in 1999, compared to 12.3 million in 1998.
Exchange trading fees were $83.9 million in 1999, compared to $89.4 million in
1998, a decrease of 6.2%. Electronic trading fees were $18.6 million in 1999
compared to $22.8 million in 1998, a decrease of 18.4%. The largest component
of exchange trading fees, non-member fees, decreased from $71.3 million in 1998
to $68.5 million in 1999, a decline of 3.9%.
The decrease in exchange fees as a result of lower trading volume was
partially offset by increased revenue from the sale of market data. In 1999, we
received $54.0 million in revenue from the sale of market data and in 1998, we
received $53.1 million in revenue from the sale of market data, representing an
increase of 1.7%.
Building revenue from leased office space at 141 West Jackson Boulevard in
Chicago also increased to $22.7 million in 1999, or 3.7% above our rental
revenue in 1998 of $21.9 million. Our per square foot rental rate increased in
this same period. The amount of leased space remained steady from 1998 to 1999.
Service revenues increased 20.1% from $16.9 million in 1998 to $20.3 million in
1999.
Service revenues consist of telephone charges, badge fees, booth space and
member services related fees, and the increase primarily is attributable to
increased revenues from our trading floor communication system and from the
greater number of Project A terminals leased.
Other operating revenues for exchange trading were $1.7 million in 1999
compared to $0.4 million in 1998. This increase was due primarily to a one-time
disciplinary fine levied by the board of directors in 1999. Other operating
revenues for electronic trading were $1.3 million in 1999 compared to $0.4
million in 1998. This is primarily the result of a favorable settlement of a
lawsuit in 1999.
Interest income, which is not a component of operating income, was $1.1
million in 1999, which represented a decrease of 42.1% from 1998 interest
income of $1.9 million. This decrease resulted from an overall decrease in cash
and cash equivalents that bear interest. Offsetting the interest income was
interest expense of $6.8 million in 1999. Interest expense decreased $0.4
million, or 5.6%, from $7.2 million in 1998 due to our reduced debt balance in
1999.
Expenses. Operating expenses totaled $214.5 million in 1999, compared to
$188.3 million in 1998, which was an increase of 13.9%. Salaries and benefits
increased 10.5% to $64.1 million in 1999 from $58.0 million in 1998. The
increase in salary and benefits expenses of $6.1 million was due to increased
staffing levels relative to 1998, as well as non-cash changes to our pension
plan assumptions of $0.6 million.
80
Professional services expense was $32.5 million in 1999 and $19.9 million in
1998, which was an increase of $12.6 million or 63.3%. The increase in expenses
in connection with professional services was partly attributable to an
additional $8.0 million of expenses incurred in 1999 to make our computers and
systems year 2000 compliant. In addition, we incurred restructuring costs of
$1.7 million and professional fees for order routing of $6.6 million in 1999.
Our general and administrative expenses increased $5.7 million to $51.0
million in 1999, a 12.6% change from the $45.3 million in general and
administrative expenses in 1998. These expenses represent our general operating
costs, such as telecommunications expenses, the cost of information machines on
the trading floors and data processing expenses totaling $16.8 million in 1999
compared to $13.4 million in 1998. The expenses associated with the
communications lines for the increased number of Project A workstations,
totaling $4.6 million in 1999 compared to $2.3 million in 1998, were also
included in general and administrative expenses. Depreciation and amortization
expense increased $2.4 million in 1999 primarily as a result of computer
equipment additions.
Building operating expenses increased 2.7% from $22.6 million in 1998 to
$23.2 million in 1999. Program costs decreased 17.0% from $8.8 million in 1998
to $7.3 million in 1999, which was primarily attributable to a change in the
marketing efforts of the CBOT.
Minority interest in net loss of subsidiaries, which represents the Ceres
limited partners' share of Ceres's net loss as well as the minority interest
share of the net loss of Ceres's subsidiary, Chicago Board Brokerage, LLC of
$6.9 million in 1999 was primarily attributable to Chicago Board Brokerage's
net loss for 1999. Chicago Board Brokerage was dissolved in 1999.
The provision for income taxes decreased $8.0 million, from $5.1 million in
1998 to a net tax benefit of $2.9 million in 1999. This decrease was primarily
due to our pretax loss of $17.4 million in 1999, compared to pretax income of
$11.7 million in 1998.
Financial Condition
At June 30, 2001, total assets were $361.7 million, a decrease of $10.5
million from $372.2 million at December 31, 2000. Current assets increased $2.9
million from $52.4 million at year end 2000 to $55.2 million at June 30, 2001,
primarily due to an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $3.3 million.
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, was $291.5 million at
June 30, 2001, a decrease of $12.4 million from $303.8 million at December 31,
2000. The change in net property and equipment during the first six months of
2001 was primarily a function of capital spending of $9.7 million offset by
recorded depreciation of $20.7 million and $1.4 million of disposals of
obsolete computer hardware. Other assets were down $1.0 million at $15.0
million.
Total liabilities at June 30, 2001 decreased $17.3 million to $163.6
million, from $180.9 million at the end of 2000. Financing activities included
proceeds of $10.0 million from the issuance of a note payable secured by
certain CBOT assets. Other changes in debt were comprised of payments of $10.7
million on private placement senior notes, $7.3 million to retire the revolving
credit facility and $1.5 million net paydown on a note payable to Deutsche
Borse AG related to the a/c/e platform. Thus, notes payable and long term debt
were reduced to $81.5 million at June 30, 2001.
For the year ended December 31, 2000, total assets were $372.2 million, a
decrease of $1.2 million from $373.4 million in 1999. Current assets increased
$3.0 million from $49.3 million in 1999 to $52.3 million in 2000, due to an
increase in cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $5.8 million offset by a
decrease of $7.1 million in income taxes receivable for which the CBOT received
refunds in 2000. In addition, accounts receivable increased $4.2 million from
1999 primarily due to the increased fees received from market data and exchange
fees partially offset by an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts of
$2.1 million. Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, was
$305.1 million in 2000, a decrease of $4.3 million from
81
$309.4 million in 1999, primarily due to purchases of computer equipment and
software more than offset by depreciation. Included in property and equipment
the capitalization of software for the a/c/e system as required to be
capitalized under Statement of Position 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." Other assets of
$14.8 million increased by $0.2 million from 14.6 million at December 31, 1999.
At December 31, 2000, the CBOT held $28.2 million in cash and cash
equivalents, compared to $22.4 million at December 31, 1999. This increase
consisted primarily of net cash generated by operating activities of $46.4
million less net cash used primarily for capital expenditures and investments
of $38.6 million and net repayment of debt of $2.0 million. Working capital
deficit at December 31, 2000 was $24.1 million compared to working capital of
$1.1 million at December 31, 1999. The decrease was primarily the result of an
increase in the current portion of long-term debt of $11.5 million and amount
due to CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C. of $8.9 million.
At December 31, 2000, total liabilities increased $8.5 million to $180.9
million from $172.4 million at December 31, 1999. This increase consisted
primarily of $1.8 million in deferred taxes, $8.9 million due to CBOT/Eurex
Alliance, L.L.C., and a one-time contract settlement payable of $6.1 million
offset by an $11.7 million reduction in outstanding debt and reductions in
accounts payable. Total debt of the CBOT at December 31, 2000 was $82.3 million
and included $75 million of privately placed notes and $7.3 million of a
revolving credit line with a lending institution. Members' equity was $191.3
million at December 31, 2000 compared to $201.0 million at December 31, 1999.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2001, cash and cash equivalents were $31.5 million, compared to
$28.2 million at December 31, 2000. This increase consisted primarily of net
cash generated from operating activities of $22.8 million less cash used for
capital expenditures of $9.7 million and net repayment of debt of $10.0
million.
Current liabilities exceeded current assets by $13.8 million at June 30,
2001, an improvement of 43% from $24.1 million at December 31, 2000, from
ongoing measures at the CBOT to improve cash flow. For example, annual member
dues were billed and collected at the beginning of the calendar year. Also,
capital expenditures have been reduced. Current year-to-date spending on
capital items decreased 39% from the comparable period of 2000. Finally,
increased net earnings led to increased cash flows from operating activities,
which significantly improved liquidity. CBOT management currently believes the
current assets will exceed current liabilities by the end of 2001. Further,
CBOT management currently believes that the borrowing capacity and funds
generated through operations will be sufficient to meet cash requirements
currently and in the forseeable future.
For the year ended December 31, 2000, cash and cash equivalents increased
$5.8 million from $22.4 million at December 31, 1999 to $28.2 million at
December 31, 2000. Net cash flows from operating activities were $46.4 million
in 2000, which reflected increases in certain liabilities, including the amount
due to CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C. of $8.9 million. Net cash flows used in
investing activities for 2000 was $38.6 million, which was primarily due to the
purchase of computer software relating to the a/c/e system. Net cash flows used
in financing activities were $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2000
which was attributable to a net reduction in the principal outstanding on our
lines of credit.
For the year ended December 31, 1999, interest payments were $6.8 million.
These consisted primarily of interest paid for the private placement of senior
notes and for the revolving credit line of interest. The $75.0 million
principal amount for the private placement senior notes requires annual
principal repayments of $10.7 million beginning in March 2001 with a final
repayment of remaining principal in March 2007.
The CBOT had a $10.0 million line of credit that was to expire in May 2001.
Borrowings under this line of credit were secured by the CBOT's receivables and
carried interest at LIBOR plus 62.5 basis points. As of December 31, 2000,
about $1.3 million was available under the line of credit based on the
borrowing base terms. This credit line contained covenants that required, among
other things, that the CBOT maintain specified levels of minimum net worth and
meet defined financial ratios.
82
On March 30, 2001, the CBOT borrowed $10.0 million pursuant to a promissory
note bearing interest at a rate of 8.25% per annum and secured by certain of
the CBOT's equipment. The proceeds were used to repay all borrowings under the
$10.0 million line of credit, which was retired. The promissory note is payable
in equal monthly installments of principal and interest through April 1, 2004.
As of December 31, 2000, the CBOT had a working capital deficit of about
$24.1 million, which reflects the substantial resources that the CBOT has
committed to the development, maintenance and support of both its open outcry
and electronic trading systems as well as the impact of lower than historical
volumes in its open outcry trading market. Since 1998, we have made substantial
expenditures related to the creation of the a/c/e system, while continuing to
upgrade our open outcry system and facilities. We have taken steps to improve
our cash flow and to bring our working capital positive by the end of 2001. To
generate cash earlier in 2001, given certain debt obligations due in March
2001, the CBOT has accelerated the period by which member dues are billed and
collected, from quarterly to annual advance billing. Pursuant to the CBOT rules
and regulations, dues were assessed on a quarterly basis beginning in June
2000. Prior to June 2000, dues had been waived by the CBOT as a result of its
cash flow and working capital position. The waiving of dues in previous periods
had no impact on CBOT billing annual dues for 2001 on January 1, 2001.
Management developed, and the board of directors has approved, the CBOT's
operating budget for 2001, which reflects positive working capital by year-end
2001. This plan reflects the full year's impact of the increases in exchange
fee rates implemented September 1, 2000. The plan also includes reductions to
capital and operational spending. The CBOT plans to defer certain technological
enhancements not deemed crucial to the operation of the open outcry system and
of the a/c/e system. Trading revenue in the plan is based on levels of trading
historically experienced by the CBOT, but lower than that for 2000.
You should be aware that our assumed revenues for 2001 are based upon
certain assumptions, including assumptions relating to our annual trading
volume next year. Futures trading volume has historically been subject to
significant fluctuations and we cannot assure you that we will achieve the
trading volume levels assumed in our budget.
The CBOT has the ability to assess and collect additional dues from our
members to support our cash needs. Although not currently contemplated, we may
also consider additional sources of funds such as restructuring our outstanding
senior notes into a longer term mortgage secured by our buildings, a sale of
some or all of our real estate and conversion of our credit line into long-term
asset-based financing. However, we cannot provide any assurance that these
sources will be available or that they will be sufficient to meet our liquidity
needs for the foreseeable future.
For important information about risks related to our future capital and
liquidity requirements, see "Risk Factors--Risk Factors Relating to Our
Business--We May Be Unable to Meet Our Future Capital and Liquidity
Requirements."
Market Risk
The CBOT provides the contract market for trading futures and options on
futures. However, it does not trade futures and options on futures for its own
account. The CBOT invests available cash in highly liquid, short-term
investment grade paper. The CBOT does not believe there is any significant risk
associated with these short term investments.
Foreign Currency Risk
The CBOT historically has transacted minimal business in foreign currencies.
The alliance with the Eurex Group has created additional foreign currency
transactions in 1999 and 2000, specifically in the euro. On September 27, 2000,
the CBOT entered into foreign exchange forward contracts with a financial
institution to hedge our risk of foreign currency fluctuations related to
certain commitments to the Eurex Group and Deutsche Borse Systems AG which are
denominated in euros for the operations of the a/c/e system and additional
software enhancements. The notional amount of these contracts total about $29.0
million with
83
exchange rates ranging from 0.89429 to 0.91100 and maturities at various dates
through 2002 corresponding to the terms of the commitments. In December, 2000,
the CBOT decided not to pursue, at this time, certain software enhancements.
The CBOT then entered into about $9.8 million of foreign exchange forward
contracts offsetting certain contracts entered into in September. Through
December 31, 2000, any gain or loss on the forward contracts hedging
commitments that had not been fulfilled and recorded was deferred.
On May 25, 2001, the CBOT entered into additional foreign exchange forward
contracts with a financial institution to hedge its risk of foreign currency
fluctuations related to certain euro-denominated liabilities and commitments to
Eurex and related entities. The notional amount of these contracts totaled
about $6.5 million (7.6 million euros) with exchange rates ranging from 0.85960
to 0.86085 and maturities at various dates through December, 2001 which
correspond to the terms of the liabilities and commitments. As of June 30,
2001, the CBOT had foreign exchange forward contracts of approximately $22.9
million (25.6 million euros). For the six months ended June 30, 2001, the CBOT
recorded a loss of $555,000 in other comprehensive income for derivatives
designated as cash flow type hedges. The CBOT believes that fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates will not have a material adverse effect on its
results of operations. For more information on recent changes in accounting for
derivative instruments, see--"Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements."
Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities," as amended, was adopted by the CBOT effective January
1, 2001. SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on
the consolidated statement of financial condition at fair value, including
derivatives embedded in financial instruments or contracts that are not clearly
and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host financial
instrument or contract. Changes in the fair value of derivatives will be
recorded each quarter in net income or, if the derivative is designated as a
cash flow hedge, in other comprehensive income. On January 1, 2001, the CBOT
recorded approximately $100,000 as a cumulative transition adjustment to
earnings relating to derivatives not designated as hedges prior to adoption of
SFAS No. 133 and to derivatives designated in fair-value type hedges prior to
adopting SFAS No. 133, and approximately $500,000 in other comprehensive income
as a cumulative transition adjustment for derivatives designated in cash-flow
type hedges prior to adopting SFAS No. 133.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," which
established accounting and reporting standards for business combinations. All
business combinations in the scope of this statement are to be accounted for
using the purchase method. The CBOT believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 141
will not have a material impact on the CBOT's financial position or results of
operations.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets," which established accounting and reporting standards for acquired
goodwill and other intangible assets. SFAS No. 142 addresses how intangible
assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets (but not
those acquired in a business combination) should be accounted for in financial
statements upon their acquisition. SFAS No. 142 also addresses how goodwill and
other intangible assets should be accounted for after they have been initially
recognized in the financial statements. The CBOT has not yet completed its
analysis of the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 142 will have on
its financial position or results of operations.
84
Quarterly Comparisons
The CBOT's operating results may fluctuate from period to period as a result
of, among other things, trading volume. The information below, which sets forth
by quarter the CBOT's income statement data for the six months ended June 30,
2001 and for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, should be read in
conjunction with the "Selected Consolidated Financial Data."
Year Ended December 31, 2001
-----------------------------------
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
------- ------- ------- --------
Revenues............................... $58,447 $61,125 $-- $ --
Expenses............................... 53,600 51,628 -- --
Income from operations................. 4,847 9,497 -- --
Income before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle........ 2,313 4,334 -- --
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of tax...... 51 -- -- --
Net Income............................. 2,262 4,334 -- --
Year Ended December 31, 2000
-----------------------------------
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
------- ------- ------- --------
Revenues............................... $55,391 $52,349 $50,907 $ 54,272
Expenses............................... 46,654 60,586 51,277 57,029
Income (loss) from operations.......... 8,737 (8,237) (370) (2,757)
Income (loss) before minority interest. 2,430 (5,386) (2,424) (4,728)
Minority interest in (income) loss of
subsidiaries.......................... (2,086) 2,086 -- --
Net Income (loss)...................... 344 (3,300) (2,424) (4,728)
Year Ended December 31, 1999
-----------------------------------
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
------- ------- ------- --------
Revenues............................... $54,071 $52,404 $52,416 $ 44,005
Expenses............................... 48,899 52,679 51,685 61,266
Income (loss) from operations.......... 5,172 (275) 731 (17,261)
Income (loss) before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle and
minority interest..................... 2,114 (529) (859) (15,186)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of tax...... 2,920 -- -- --
Minority interest in (income) loss of
subsidiaries.......................... 1,390 (903) (691) 7,137
Net Income (loss)...................... 584 (1,432) (1,550) (8,049)
On January 1, 1999, the CBOT adopted Statement of Position 98-5, Reporting
on the Costs of Start-up Activities, which requires that start-up activities be
expensed as incurred. Previously, start-up activities were capitalized and
amortized. The cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle was
$4,946,000, net of a tax benefit of $2,026,000.
On September 30, 1999, the CBOT dissolved the brokerage division of Ceres
known as Chicago Board Brokerage, LLC. Losses in the amount of about $10.6
million were generated by Chicago Board Brokerage, LLC in 1999.
In the fourth quarter 1999, the CBOT experienced lower trading volume due to
the year 2000 issue. This resulted in about $8 million in reduced revenues. In
addition, expenses increased by about $10 million relating to year 2000
compliance and restructuring costs.
85
First quarter 2000 amounts have been adjusted to reflect the capitalization
of certain costs related to the development of the a/c/e system that had
previously been capitalized in the second quarter of 2000.
In the second quarter 2000, the CBOT recognized a one-time contract
settlement related to the termination of the employment agreement with a former
president and chief executive officer of about $8 million.
In the fourth quarter of 2000, the CBOT recognized bad debt expense of $2.1
million related to amounts receivable from one of our market data customers.
As described above "--Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements," on January 1,
2001, the CBOT adopted SFAS No. 133, requiring recognition of all derivative
instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as either
assets or liabilities and the measurement of those instruments at fair value.
SFAS No. 133 also requires changes in the fair value of derivative instruments
to be recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income
depending on the intended use of the derivatives. The cumulative effect of this
change in accounting principle, net of tax, was $51,000.
In the first quarter of 2001, the CBOT recognized bad debt expense of $1.5
million related to amounts receivable from one of our market data customers.
The CBOT also recognized expense of $1.3 million related to the retirement of
obsolete computer hardware. In addition, the CBOT established an accrual of
$3.0 million for the potential settlement of various pending lawsuits.
Furthermore, the CBOT recognized $1.2 million in severance costs related to the
ongoing restructuring at the CBOT.
In the second quarter of 2001, the CBOT recognized $0.8 million in severance
costs related to the ongoing restructuring at the CBOT.
86
OUR BUSINESS
Overview
Founded in 1848, we are one of the world's leading exchanges for the trading
of futures and options on futures contracts, with total volume in the first
half of 2001 of about 127 million contracts, which, according to industry data
provided by the Futures Industry Institute, represented about 9% of the total
volume of all global listed futures, options on futures and equity index
contracts. According to industry data provided by the Futures Industry
Association, we ranked third worldwide among futures exchanges in volume of
contracts traded in the first half of 2001, transacting about 42% of the global
listed agricultural futures and options contracts, e.g., wheat, corn, soybeans,
and about 16% of the global listed financial futures and options contracts,
e.g., U.S. Treasury bonds and notes. From our origins in the nineteenth century
as a market for trading cash grain, we have evolved into a major financial
center in the twenty-first century, offering a diverse range of contracts based
on interest rates, agricultural commodities, equity indices and other
underlying instruments and risk-based activities.
We operate markets for the trading of commodity and financial futures
contracts, as well as options on futures contracts. These contracts have been
developed through our extensive research and development efforts and through
relationships with market participants and other financial institutions. We
operate traditional open outcry auction markets where our members trade in a
centralized location with other members. Members may be individual traders, who
risk their personal capital and provide significant liquidity to our markets,
or floor brokers who are executing transactions on behalf of customers or
member firm proprietary accounts. We also make our products available for
trading on an electronic trading system operated pursuant to our alliance with
the Eurex Group, which includes the operators of the world's largest
derivatives exchange.
We also engage in extensive regulatory compliance activities, including
market surveillance and financial supervision activities, designed to ensure
market integrity and provide financial safeguards for users of our markets. Our
traditional open outcry and electronic trade execution services provide market
participants the ability to determine current market prices, known as "price
discovery," and trade matching services that offer market participants price
transparency, anonymity and immediacy. Further, we market and distribute
valuable real-time and historical market data generated from trading activity
in our markets to users of our products and related cash and derivative markets
and financial information providers.
Our market participants include many of the world's largest banks,
investment firms and agricultural corporations. These participants use our
products for hedging, risk management, asset allocation and speculation. Other
market users include financial institutions, such as public and private pension
funds, mutual funds, hedge funds and other managed funds, insurance companies,
corporations, commercial banks, professional independent traders and retail
customers. Our users can be broadly categorized as hedgers or speculators,
depending on whether they transfer risk or accept risk. Hedgers are market
participants who seek to transfer price risk in an underlying commodity, e.g.,
soybeans, or financial instrument, e.g., U.S. Treasury bonds. Speculators, on
the other hand, accept price risk and attempt to make profits through buying
and selling futures contracts by anticipating price changes and generally have
no interest in making or taking delivery of the underlying commodity or
instrument.
We have developed innovative and cost-effective products and execution and
order routing systems which benefit our members and customers. As indicated in
the chart below, we have recently experienced a decline in trading volume. We
believe that such decline in our trading volume have been caused primarily by a
decrease in interest rate volatility, growth in equity trading, changes in
Federal Reserve monetary policy and the business cycle of the U.S. economy.
87
Chicago Board of Trade
Annual Futures and Options Volume
1990-2001
[BAR CHART APPEARS HERE]
1990 154,231,583
1991 139,437,298
1992 150,031,392
1993 178,773,075
1994 219,504,074
1995 210,673,044
1996 222,438,505
1997 242,698,919
1998 281,189,436
1999 254,561,215
2000 233,528,558
*2001 126,651,206
*Bold portion represents contract volume for January 1, 2001 through June 30,
2001. Shaded portion together with bold portion represents projected
annualized contract volume for 2001 based upon actual volume through June 30,
2001.
--------
Source: CBOT records
Presently, derivatives markets are experiencing significant and rapid
changes due to relaxation of regulatory barriers and advances in technology.
Foreign exchanges and exchange-like enterprises operated by or for banks and
broker-dealers have gained increased access to U.S. markets as a result of
regulatory changes. The ability of computer and telecommunications systems
today to efficiently and economically bring buyers and sellers together
presents new challenges to centralized open outcry auction markets, including
our open outcry markets. These changes are lowering barriers to entry and
creating a lower-cost business model, forcing traditional open outcry exchanges
to streamline their operations and reduce costs. We believe that large market
users and the threat of competition have forced exchanges to seek more
efficient trading, processing and clearing facilities. We have responded to
these challenges by implementing innovative technology, including the a/c/e
system, to preserve and enhance our current business and to streamline our
trade execution and processing, which has resulted in substantial automation.
We have also sought to refine our existing products, develop innovative new
products to satisfy customers' demands and continue to enhance the ability of
our independent traders to provide liquidity in our markets.
In order to continue to enhance our ability to compete in this dynamic
marketplace, our business strategy includes demutualizing the CBOT by creating
a stock, for-profit holding company pursuant to the restructuring transactions
described in this document. We intend to seek to improve our corporate
governance structure by, among other things, focusing the role of the board on
traditional oversight activities reducing significantly the number and
responsibility of existing committees and enhancing and expanding the
responsibility and authority of our management. The restructuring transactions
will also significantly reduce members' rights with respect to participation in
the day-to-day management and operation of our business, including through the
substantial elimination of the membership petition process. For example,
following the restructuring transactions, stockholders of CBOT Holdings and
Class B and Class C members of the CBOT subsidiary will not have the right to
call special meetings of stockholders to vote on proposals and stockholders of
CBOT Holdings will not
88
be able to take stockholder action by written consent instead of a meeting.
Stockholders of CBOT Holdings may request a vote on a proposal to amend our
bylaws at our annual meetings, but only if the request complies with certain
advance notice requirements under our bylaws and the regulations regarding
proxy solicitation under the federal securities laws, as applicable. We believe
that the restructuring transactions will enable us to strengthen and expand our
core business.
Products
We believe that the range and diversity of the products that may be traded
on our exchange facilities contribute significantly to our success. These
products include futures contracts and options on futures contracts based upon
interest rates, debt instruments, agricultural commodities, stock indices and
other underlying instruments. We have a product development and a marketing
division to support market participants and foster the trading and development
of current and future products. Our product development and marketing staffs
meet regularly with market users, members and clearing members to determine
whether our current products, facilities and services meet the participants'
needs and whether modifications or enhancements are necessary. Our product
development and marketing staffs also develop new product ideas in consultation
with market users and other financial institutions.
The following chart depicts the distribution of trading volumes across our
three major product sectors in 2001:
.interest rate products;
.agricultural and other non-financial/commodities products; and
.stock index products.
[PIE CHART APPEARS HERE]
Interest Rate Products 95,054,958 75.052549%
Agricultural Products 29,065,586 22.949316%
Stock Index Products 2,521,233 1.990690%
*Other 9,429 0.007445%
Metals 9,429
Energy 0
PCS Insurance 0
--------
Source: CBOT records
89
Interest Rate Products
Seventy-five percent of all of the contracts traded at the CBOT during the
first half of 2001 were either financial futures or options on financial
futures contracts. Our interest rate product line includes our U.S. Treasury
bond futures contract, which is currently our largest single product based on
trading volume. Trading of U.S. Treasury bond futures and options contracts
comprised about 39% of our financial product volume and about 29% of our total
transaction volume for the first half of 2001. Our other interest rate products
include ten-year, five-year and two-year U.S. Treasury note futures and
options, federal agency futures and options, "Fed funds" futures, mortgage
futures and options as well as municipal bond index futures and options.
Trading volumes in our interest rate products have fluctuated over the last
decade. We believe that these fluctuations primarily reflect changes in Federal
Reserve monetary policies and changing levels of interest rate volatility
during these periods, rather than successful competition from other exchanges
or increased use of alternative products or markets by market participants. The
overall volume of our interest rate products for the first half of 2001 was
down about 0.2% over the same period in 2000. We believe that the primary
causes for the declines in volume since 1998 have been reduced issuance of
long-term debt by the U.S. government, reflecting in part favorable budgetary
conditions, as well as the government's repurchase of outstanding bonds. These
policies have reduced the supply of cash 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds, removed
bonds from credit market benchmark status and caused a decline in U.S. Treasury
bond futures and options volume at the CBOT.
We believe that hedgers and speculators have increasingly turned to our ten-
year and five-year U.S. Treasury notes in order to manage interest rate risks.
The increase in volumes for ten-year and five-year notes has offset some of the
decrease in volume for the 30-year bonds. Volume in our interest rate products
continues to constitute a significant part of our business. The following chart
indicates the annual trading volume of interest rate futures and options on the
CBOT from 1990 through 2001.
Chicago Board of Trade
Annual Interest Rate Futures and Options Volume
1990-2001
[BAR CHART]
1990 113,440,091
1991 101,592,869
1992 112,655,672
1993 136,322,817
1994 177,017,577
1995 160,300,159
1996 156,994,150
1997 179,703,338
1998 218,570,232
1999 190,996,164
2000 169,432,716
*2001 187,666,380
*Bold portion represents contract volume for January 1, 2001 through June 30,
2001. Shaded portion together with bold portion represents projected
annualized contract volume for 2001 based upon actual volume through June 30,
2001.
--------
Source: CBOT records
90
Market participants take advantage of the flexibility and liquidity of the
interest rate products we list. Our market users generally include banks,
broker/dealers and other financial institutions, all of whom must cope with
interest rate risk that arises naturally from their core business activities,
e.g., lending, borrowing, underwriting fixed-income securities, or from their
dealing in interest rate swaps, structured derivative products and other over-
the-counter products. A significant number of our clearing member firms are
affiliates of major domestic and international banks who utilize our interest
rate markets for their proprietary trading activities. Asset managers also use
our interest rate products to lengthen or shorten the effective duration of
their portfolios. We believe that our contracts are especially useful for this
purpose where physical restructuring of a portfolio is difficult or where
futures transaction costs are less than cash market transaction costs.
Agricultural and Non-Financial/Commodities Products
Agricultural products are the core product area from which we started. We
have maintained a strong franchise in our agricultural products, including
contracts based on soybeans, soybean oil and meal, corn, wheat, oats, rough
rice and other agricultural commodities. Our market users include agricultural
producers, grain elevators, food processors and retail customers. Other non-
financial/commodities products we offer include silver and gold futures, silver
options and insurance options. Together, our agricultural and other non-
financial and commodities products represented about 23% of all contracts
traded at the CBOT in the first half of 2001. Our trading volumes in these
products from 1990 through 2001 are illustrated in the following chart. We
believe that continuing consolidation and restructuring in the agricultural
sector and the reduction or elimination of government subsidies could provide
growth in our agricultural markets as large producers and processors are more
likely to adopt formal hedging and risk management programs.
Chicago Board of Trade
Annual Stock Index Futures and Options Volume
1990-2001
[BAR CHART]
1990 39,613,019
1991 37,002,033
1992 36,928,711
1993 41,150,250
1994 42,348,484
1995 50,260,845
1996 65,369,379
1997 62,023,609
1998 58,749,036
1999 59,407,848
2000 60,303,460
*2001 29,065,586
*Bold portion represents contract volume for January 1, 2001 through June 30,
2001. Shaded portion together with bold portion represents projected
annualized contract volume for 2001 based upon actual volume through June 30,
2001.
--------
Source: CBOT records
91
Stock Index Products
Futures and options on futures contracts on stock indices are intended to
allow traders and investors the opportunity to invest in the entire market, in
selected portions of the market or in the relative performances of the various
market sectors relative to one another and relative to the entire market.
Market users of these products include public and private pension funds,
investment companies, mutual funds, insurance companies and other financial
services companies that benchmark their investment performance to different
segments of the equity markets. We currently offer futures and options on
futures contracts on the Dow Jones Industrial Averagesm, The Dow Jones
Transportation Average, the Dow Jones Utilities Average and the Dow Jones
Composite Indexes.
In June 1997, we entered into an agreement with Dow Jones & Company, Inc. to
license certain index and trademark rights, including, among other things, the
Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Dow Jones Transportation Average, the Dow
Jones Utilities Average and the Dow Jones Global Indexes. The license is a non-
transferable and exclusive worldwide license to use these indices as the basis
for standardized exchange-traded futures contracts and options on futures
contracts. The agreement, which will expire on September 30, 2002, requires the
CBOT to pay Dow Jones initial license fees, which were paid in 1997, and annual
royalties based upon trading volumes with a minimum annual royalty requirement
of $2.0 million. We paid annual royalties of $2.0 million in each of 1998, 1999
and 2000.
As depicted in the following chart, our equity index product trading volumes
have generally increased since the introduction of the Dow Jones indices in
late 1997, from about 0.9 million contracts in 1997, to about 3.8 million
contracts in 1998, to about 4.1 million contracts in 1999 to about 3.8 million
contracts in 2000. In the first half of 2001, equity index trading volume was
about 2.5 million contracts.
Chicago Board of Trade
Annual Stock Futures and Options Volume
1990-2001
[BAR CHART]
1990 951,555
1991 705,986
1992 363,094
1993 158,384
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 911,608
1998 3,812,910
1999 4,125,646
2000 3,772,840
*2001 5,724,132
*Bold portion represents actual contract volume for January 1, 2001 through
June 30, 2001. Shaded portion together with bold portion represents projected
annualized contract volume for 2001 based upon actual contract value through
June 30, 2001.
--------
Source: CBOT records
92
In 2000, Congress adopted legislation that allows us to trade single-stock
futures contracts under the regulatory jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures
Exchange Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission. This new type
of product could have significant appeal to retail investors and institutional
investors.
Under the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, single-stock futures
contracts were made available to be traded on markets limited to institutional
investors trading for their own account on a principal-to-principal basis on
August 21, 2001. Single stock futures should be available to be traded on
markets that also allow retail investors to participate as well as brokered
trades for institutional investors by December 21, 2001.
Execution Facilities
We currently operate two trade execution facilities: a traditional pit-
based, open outcry trading market and, through our alliance with the Eurex
Group, the a/c/e system.
Open Outcry Trading
In the traditional open outcry trading environment, traders who risk
personal capital, or floor brokers, who may execute orders for institutional,
commercial, proprietary and retail customers, bid and offer in an open outcry
auction arena. This environment facilitates discovery of market prices. We
believe that the CBOT has a strong history of providing a venue that offers its
users tremendous liquidity, access to trading opportunities, and a reliable and
stable trading environment.
Open outcry trading occurs in individual arenas and represented about 83% of
our total volume in the first half of 2001. The trading pits are the
centralized meeting place for floor brokers and independent traders to trade
contracts. Orders for market participants not on the trading floor are relayed
to brokers for execution in the trading pits. The trading floors, which cover
about 115,150 square feet, have booths surrounding the trading pits from which
clearing member firm personnel can communicate with customers regarding current
market activity and prices and receive orders either electronically or by
telephone. In addition, our trading floors display current market information
and news on wallboards hung above the pits.
We have enhanced our open outcry and electronic trading markets through
automation and lower fees to help us maintain liquidity for market users. To do
this, we have streamlined processes involving order entry, trade execution and
open outcry price discovery. The basis for maintaining an open outcry trading
system is our belief that many market participants find this system to be an
efficient mechanism for price discovery. The open outcry system leverages our
members' market-making expertise by utilizing hundreds of speculators to
facilitate liquidity and to provide floor brokers with a mechanism to manage
execution risk for customers. We believe that the open outcry system is
regarded as having a long-standing history as an environment of integrity,
stability and reliability.
Technology Supporting our Open Outcry Execution Facilities
In order to maintain the viability and growth of the open outcry trading
system, we have invested and, to the extent that our resources permit, we plan
to continue to invest in technology. The CBOT will seek to continue its
development of technology to provide market participants with rapid, reliable
and cost-effective transaction processing. However, we cannot assure you that
we will be able to fund technology in the future. This approach will focus on
the following applications.
Order Transmission Systems. Our Order Direct application protocol interface
enables our member firms to transmit orders electronically to and from the open
outcry pits and any other firm or broker, and provides an entry point for
Internet-based orders from customers and branch offices. This application has
resulted in increased order and confirmation speed, reduced transaction costs,
decreased risk of error, improved customer account tracking and bookkeeping and
faster clearing reconciliation. eOpenoutcry.com is our web-enabled,
93
browser-based software system that allows trade order entry, execution and
confirmation display via the Internet, enhancing member access to the trading
floor while reducing transaction costs.
Trade Execution Systems. Our customers may select one of the following two
trade execution systems for executing transactions in the open outcry trading
environment.
. COMET is the CBOT's booth-based order entry device that fulfills the need
for fast and efficient electronic order delivery to the trading floor
while preserving the firm's choice of delivery method to the broker. In
keeping with the firm's preference, COMET orders may be "flashed" by
hand, delivered by wireless headset or delivered electronically to the
broker for execution. COMET then enables the trade data to be
electronically routed to the firm's bookkeeping system and to the
clearing location on a real-time basis.
. Electronic Clerks are the CBOT's order receipt and deck management
devices for brokers. Using a hard-wired or wireless Electronic Clerk,
unit brokers may receive orders from multiple member firms. Orders are
automatically organized by price and order type for ease and speed of
execution and trade confirmations are automatically returned to the
originator.
Floor Operations Technology. Floor operations technology consists of the
pricing and quotation network as well as the data network. The pricing and
quotation network collects and disseminates in real time all CBOT pricing data.
The internal data network connects futures commission merchants and other
building occupants with the floor and one another for all CBOT pricing data.
The pricing quotation network comprises price reporters who monitor the price
fluctuation in each of the pits and use an electronic data network to
communicate this information. As trades are executed, the reporters enter the
price data into the pricing network. The price network transmits the data to
the wall board display system, the historical data library and the data
services network for re-transmittal through information providers such as
Bloomberg. The current data network is a traditional wired network.
Substantially all futures commission merchant offices have the capability to
access the network in order to communicate with other offices and the floor.
Most futures commission merchants have external data connections as well as
Internet access.
Electronic Trading
The CBOT has made its products available for electronic trading since 1992,
initially, on the Globex system, and, beginning in 1994, on Project A, which
was operated through the electronic trading division of Ceres. Since 1998,
Project A provided access to the CBOT's global benchmark financial and index
products 22 hours each trading day, with workstations located in the United
States, Europe and Asia.
In August 2000, Project A was shut down and replaced by the a/c/e system,
which is the product of an alliance between the CBOT and certain affiliates and
Deutsche Borse AG, the Swiss Stock Exchange and their jointly owned
subsidiaries, Eurex Zurich AG and Eurex Frankfurt AG. A jointly-owned company
called CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C. was established to provide services related
to electronic trading to Ceres and to Eurex. CBOT products are accessible
electronically throughout Europe and access points in Tokyo, Japan. We have
obtained permission to put our terminals in several foreign countries,
including the United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Japan, Ireland,
the Netherlands and Finland.
94
At launch, 81 CBOT member firms were able to trade all CBOT products on the
a/c/e system. As of June 30, 2001, volume on the a/c/e system surpassed an
aggregate of above 30.2 million contracts traded since it became operational.
The chart below illustrates monthly volume on the a/c/e system for the months
of September 2000 through June 2001:
Chicago Board of Trade
Monthly a/c/e/ Volume
September 2000 - June 2001
[BAR CHART]
September 2000 2,005,061
October 2000 2,282,747
November 2000 2,274,670
December 2000 1,787,467
January 2001 2,862,510
February 2001 3,027,262
March 2001 3,620,442
April 2001 3,508,953
May 2001 4,375,128
June 2001 4,175,063
--------
Source: CBOT records
Ceres owns a/c/e Release 1.0, which is the current version of the a/c/e
software operated for the CBOT. In addition, Ceres has a perpetual license to
use Eurex Release 2.0, which is the base software over which the a/c/e software
operates.
Under a licensing agreement, Ceres provides services related to the
operation of the a/c/e system and a sublicense of the a/c/e software to the
CBOT. In addition, under a separate agreement, Ceres operates with employees
seconded to it from the CBOT.
CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C. has retained Deutsche Borse Systems AG, a
subsidiary of Deutsche Borse AG, to provide system operations and software
development services for the a/c/e system. The joint venture operating
agreement for CBOT/Eurex Alliance L.L.C. is not yet signed and is not likely to
be finished until decisions are made regarding its structure and functions. The
Eurex Group has invoked the dispute resolution procedure established under our
agreements with them in connection with this issue, and the parties have begun
discussions to attempt to resolve this issue, but no assurance can be made
about whether, when or how this issue will be resolved. See "Risk Factors--Our
Decision Not to Fund the Development of Certain Upgrades to the a/c/e System
Could Significantly Harm our Electronic Trading Operations."
CBOT/Eurex Alliance may also provide services to us, to Eurex and to other
exchanges. In addition, CBOT/Eurex Alliance has engaged in planning for making
options on individual U.S. equities available for electronic trading.
CBOT/Eurex Alliance's profits are shared equally by its two members, Ceres
Alliance L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ceres, and Eurex Beteiligungen
AG, and its expenses are allocated among the two members as incurred.
95
We currently limit direct access to the a/c/e system to our members. This
may inhibit the growth of the electronic trading system, and may inhibit
revenue growth as well. Members are permitted to have an unlimited number of
terminals to conduct proprietary or customer trading, and member firms that
handle customer business are permitted to connect their own electronic order
routing systems to the a/c/e system. Eurex member firms have been given the
right to obtain electronic access to our products traded on the a/c/e system by
leasing a Full Membership or Associate Membership or buying an Associate
Membership. It is possible that the restrictions contained in our access policy
may be relaxed in order to attempt to increase revenue growth, but it is also
possible that these restrictions may remain unchanged or even be tightened,
including, among other reasons, in order to preserve the value of the Class B
and Class C memberships of the CBOT subsidiary in light of issues raised by the
Chicago Board Options Exchange with respect to the exercise right. For more
information, see "Risk Factors--Risks Relating to the Restructuring
Transactions--The "Exercise Right' Could be Subject to Further Challenge by the
Chicago Board Options Exchange." Our retention of some or all of these
restrictions may inhibit revenue growth relating to our electronic trading
markets.
Market Data
Our markets generate valuable information regarding the prices of our
products and the trading activity in those markets. We sell our market data,
which includes bids, offers, trades and trade size, to vendors who redistribute
the data to persons or entities that use our markets or that monitor general
economic conditions. Such persons and entities include financial information
providers, futures commission merchants, banks, broker-dealers, public and
private pension funds, investment companies, mutual funds, insurance companies,
hedge funds, commodity pools, individual investors and other financial services
companies or organizations.
We believe the market data supplied by the CBOT enhances trading activity in
our products and trading activity in related cash and derivatives markets. The
dissemination of real-time data generates revenue and supports our customer
bases with timely market information. In general, the price information is sent
via dedicated networks to over 140 worldwide quote vendors and subvendors.
These firms consolidate our market data and information with data from other
exchanges and third party data and news services and the firms resell the
consolidated data and information to their subscribers. These quote vendors
distribute our market data through dedicated networks, the Internet and
wireless handheld devices.
As of June 30, 2001, our market data was displayed on over 185,000 screens
worldwide. Revenue from market data represented about 27% of our total revenue
during the first half of 2001. Our annual revenue from market data has grown
from less than $45 million in 1996 to more than $61 million in 2000. We
attribute this increase to a change in our market data pricing structure that
we instituted last year, as well as a substantial increase in the total number
of display devices receiving our market data.
We believe that the evolution of technology and the financial services
industry will change the existing distribution channels, sales methods and
pricing structure for market data. These changes might adversely impact the
revenue we receive from market data. Increases in the volume of electronic
trading, the use of the Internet as a distribution mechanism and increases in
the use of our products by individual retail investors will all impact revenue
from market data.
Building Services
Our building services division operates the CBOT's commercial real estate
assets. In total, we own and manage three buildings, with over 1.5 million
square feet of commercial space in the aggregate, in the central business
district of the City of Chicago. As of June 30, 2001, the buildings were about
97% occupied, with about 27% of the occupied space used by the CBOT itself.
96
Tenants pay market rates for rent. The majority of tenant leases have terms
of five years, with large tenants having leases for up to ten years. The
largest tenant, other than the CBOT itself, leases 15% of the rentable area and
the next five largest tenants lease about 12% of our commercial space. The CBOT
manages both the real estate and the general services relating to such real
estate such as cleaning, power and telephone services. Building services
generated about 11% of our operating revenue for the first six months of 2001.
The majority of our commercial lease space is designated as "Class A," which
describes that class of premium commercial office space which is typically
located in central business districts and provides the highest level of
services and amenities. We have spent considerable resources so that all three
buildings have advanced telecommunication infrastructure and services. The
demographics of the tenants of our commercial space has begun to widen beyond
traditional brokerage/trading service firms to include technology-related firms
which we believe is due to the location and desirable telecommunications
infrastructure of our buildings.
Marketing and Advertising
Our marketing department targets both institutional and retail customers.
Our marketing programs for institutional customers are designed to educate
highly sophisticated traders, portfolio managers, corporate treasurers and
other market professionals about innovative uses of our products, such as new
hedging and risk management strategies. We also seek to educate these users
about changes in product design, margin requirements and new clearing services.
Our marketing typically involves the development of personal relationships with
professional traders who actively use our markets. We participate in a number
of domestic and international trade shows and seminars regarding futures and
options and other marketing events designed to inform market users about our
products. Through these relationships and programs, we attempt to determine the
needs of our customer base and we use this information in our product
development and product maintenance efforts.
Our advertising strategy is based on both targeted direct contact and
cooperative venture advertising techniques. We utilize direct mail, electronic
mail and fax networking extensively. We also support CBOT product-specific
advertising by futures commission merchants, reimbursing up to 50% of their
costs for certain approved programs.
Competition
We are currently one of the seven principal futures exchanges in the United
States, which include: the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Kansas City Board
of Trade, the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, the New York Board of Trade, the New
York Mercantile Exchange and the Philadelphia Board of Trade. According to data
provided by the Futures Industry Association, we are currently the third
largest futures exchange in the world based on contract volume for futures,
options on futures and equity index contracts.
We face a variety of competitors and competing marketplaces and products. We
compete by offering market participants efficient, cost-effective and liquid
marketplaces for trade execution through both open outcry and electronic
trading systems, broadly disseminated and transparent market and quotation
data, access to market making, superior product design and innovative
technology. Additionally, we are continually enhancing our products and
providing additional efficiencies to our customers. We are committed to
improving the technology, services, market integrity and liquidity that will
continue to make us an industry leader.
In addition to competition from futures exchanges that offer comparable
derivative products, we also face competition from other exchanges, from
electronic trading systems, from consortia of end users and futures commission
merchants and from technology firms. Other futures exchanges have trading
systems and financial market expertise that may lead them to consider listing
copies of our products. These potential competitors would still need to obtain
regulatory approval, establish market liquidity and develop derivative product
clearing services. For information concerning legislative changes that may make
it easier for potential competitors to enter our markets, see "--Regulation--
Changes in Existing Laws and Rules."
97
Electronic trading firms that currently specialize in the trading of equity
securities have electronic trade execution and routing systems that could be
used to trade products that compete with our products. In an industry where all
derivatives are traded electronically, the concept of an exchange, including
the services we provide and our sources of revenue, may change swiftly and
substantially. Increased development of the electronic trading markets could
increase substantially competition for some or all of the products and services
we currently provide. For more information, see "Risk Factors--Risks Relating
to Our Business--Intense Competition Could Materially Adversely Affect Our
Market Share and Financial Performance." Typically, while these firms have
advanced electronic and Internet technology, significant capitalization and
competitive pricing, we believe they lack the overall market liquidity and
neutrality offered by our electronic and open outcry trading systems. They also
currently lack the financial security and guarantees provided by a "AAA" rated
clearinghouse such as Board of Trade Clearing Corporation.
Consortia owned by member firms and large market participants also may
become our competitors, particularly with respect to our Treasury futures and
options contracts. For instance, BrokerTec Global LLC, an electronic inter-
dealer fixed income broker, has a designation as a futures contract market from
the CFTC. Most of the members of BrokerTec Global are either clearing member
firms of the CBOT or affiliates of our clearing member firms, and are
significant participants in the Treasury market.
Technology companies, market data and information vendors, and front end
software vendors also represent potential competitors because, as purveyors of
market data, these firms typically have substantial distribution capabilities.
As technology firms, they also have access to trading engines that can be
connected to their data and information networks. Additionally, technology and
software firms that develop trading systems, hardware and networks but who are
otherwise outside of the financial services industry may be attracted to enter
our markets.
Strategic Alliances, Acquisitions and Divestitures
Due to increasing competitive pressures in the futures industry, we review
our competitive position on an ongoing basis and from time to time consider,
and engage in discussions with other parties regarding, various strategic
alliances, acquisitions and divestitures in order to continue to compete
effectively, improve our financial results, increase our business and allocate
its resources efficiently. It is also important for us to form strategic
partnerships, such as the recent alliance with Eurex, to bring together the
necessary expertise and resources to address competitive pressures and meet new
market demands.
Our Members
We are currently owned by our members. Members and individuals who have
leased seats from members can execute trades for their own accounts or for the
accounts of customers of clearing member firms. The trades of members and
lessees of memberships for their own accounts qualify for lower fees in
recognition of the market liquidity that their trading activity provides.
Members and lessees also benefit from market information advantages that may
accrue from their proximity to trading activity on the trading floors.
Currently, there are five classes of CBOT memberships:
. Full;
. Associate;
. GIM (and one-half Associate Memberships, as described below);
. IDEM; and
. COM.
Each class of membership has different trading rights and privileges. All
membership applicants are reviewed and approved by us in accordance with
membership and eligibility requirements set forth in our rules and regulations.
98
Currently, memberships may be purchased or sold pursuant to transfer
mechanisms established by our rules and regulations. We currently expect that
these transfer mechanisms will be substantially the same with respect to the
CBOT subsidiary. We are currently evaluating appropriate transfer mechanisms
for CBOT Holdings, including, among other things, the retention of a third-
party transfer agent, in light of the status of CBOT Holdings as a for-profit,
stock corporation and the status of its common stock as securities after the
restructuring transactions.
Price Range for Memberships
The following table contains, for the periods indicated, the high and low
sales prices of memberships of each of the five classes of membership in the
CBOT, reported in thousands.
Full Associate GIM IDEM COM
--------- --------- -------- -------- ---------
Calendar Year High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low
------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- ---- --- ---- ----
1998
First Quarter.................. $780 $714 $489 $434 * * $90 $66 $147 $132
Second Quarter................. 725 483 410 210 $80 $61 57 28 130 62
Third Quarter.................. 495 384 204 120 * * 36 20 69 44
Fourth Quarter................. 500 431 225 175 * * 33 20 71 44
1999
First Quarter.................. 600 490 282 186 100 75 30 25 70 55
Second Quarter................. 633 560 246 220 * * 36 26 75 54
Third Quarter.................. 620 530 218 155 * * 32 24 60 47
Fourth Quarter................. 475 400 166 130 * * 33 24 46 39
2000
First Quarter.................. 520 410 150 105 70 58 27 16 37 30
Second Quarter................. 642 472 138 90 50 50 16 6 35 22
Third Quarter.................. 642 328 150 61 70 21 27 4 37 14
Fourth Quarter................. 350 255 80 50 31 23 13 ** 18 10
2001
First Quarter.................. 350 295 85 62 36 31 7 1 19 12
Second Quarter................. 350 316 82 65 39 33 8 6 21 16
Third Quarter.................. 360 312 106 75 49 40 24 20 11 7
--------
*Indicates no sales in the quarter.
**Indicates a sale price of less than $1,000.
Source: CBOT records.
Individual Members
Currently, our membership committee reviews applicants and conducts
proceedings to determine whether candidates meet our membership and eligibility
requirements. Additionally, registration or a temporary license to act as
either a floor broker or a floor trader must be granted by the National Futures
Association before an individual can begin trading on our trading floors. All
members must be guaranteed or qualified to trade by a clearing member before
they may personally execute a transaction on the CBOT's exchange facilities.
Full Members. Our Full Members are entitled to execute trades in all futures
and options contracts listed on the CBOT. As of June 30, 2001, there were 1,402
Full Memberships.
Associate Members. Our Associate Members are entitled to execute trades in
all futures and options contracts listed in the CBOT's Government Instruments
Market, Index, Debt and Energy Market and Commodity Options Market. As of June
30, 2001, there were 786 Associate Memberships.
99
GIMs/One-Half Associate Members. The holder of a GIM Membership is a member
entitled to execute trades in all futures contracts assigned to the market
category known as the "Government Instrument Market," which includes contracts
in certain U.S. government and agency securities, certain foreign government
securities and certain domestic certificates of deposit. We are currently
phasing out GIM Memberships by converting each GIM Membership into a one-half
Associate Membership upon the sale of such membership and permitting the
conversion of two one-half Associate Memberships into one Associate Membership.
Following completion of the restructuring transactions, two Series B-3, Class B
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary will be convertible into one Series B-2,
Class B membership in the CBOT subsidiary, which may result in fewer members
having the trading rights and privileges of GIMs and more members having the
trading rights and privileges of Associate Members. As of June 30, 2001, there
were 160 GIM Memberships and two one-half Associate Memberships.
For purposes of the restructuring transactions, including for purposes of
determining the number of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings and the
appropriate series of Class B membership in the CBOT subsidiary to be
distributed in connection with the restructuring transactions, all one-half
Associate Memberships shall be treated as GIM Memberships. In addition, we
sometimes in this document refer to one-half Associate Members as GIMs, as the
context requires.
IDEMs. The holder of an IDEM Membership is a member entitled to execute
trades in all futures contracts assigned to the market category known as the
"Index, Debt and Energy Market," which includes contracts in certain stock and
bond indices, certain money market instruments and certain energy, i.e., crude
oil, a gasoline and heating oil, products. As of June 30, 2001, there were 642
IDEM Memberships.
COMs. The holder of a COM Membership is a member entitled to execute trades
in all options contracts assigned to the market category known as the
"Commodity Options Market," which includes contracts in U.S. Treasury bond
futures options and all other options contacts listed for trading by the CBOT.
As of June 30, 2001, there were 643 COM Memberships.
Clearing Members
Under our rules, all CBOT contracts must be cleared through the Board of
Trade Clearing Corporation, or such other clearing entity as the CBOT board of
directors designates. Such contracts are subject to the bylaws of Board of
Trade Clearing Corporation, and our rules provide that it may not change its
bylaws without the consent of the CBOT board of directors. However, Board of
Trade Clearing Corporation has disputed this restriction and its governing
documents do not contain a similar restriction requiring the CBOT's approval
for changes to its bylaws. In addition, no person or organization may become a
stockholder of Board of Trade Clearing Corporation until approved by the CBOT.
Board of Trade Clearing Corporation has informed us that it is the world's
largest fully independent futures and futures options clearinghouse and the
only futures and options clearinghouse that is rated "AAA" by Standard &
Poor's. On a daily basis, Board of Trade Clearing Corporation compares the data
that is submitted by its members, collects and disburses original and variation
or "mark-to-market" margin payments though a network of banks, and provides its
financial guarantee of performance for every trade that is accepted by it for
clearing. Since its inception in 1925, Board of Trade Clearing Corporation has
designed risk management policies and practices for the CBOT and its members.
We do not currently have a written contract with the Board of Trade Clearing
Corporation that would obligate it to provide its clearing services to our
clearing members. We are currently considering negotiating a written contract
regarding clearing-related services with Board of Trade Clearing Corporation
prior to the completion of the restructuring transactions. However, we cannot
provide any assurances that we will determine to do so or, if we so determine,
that we will be successful in entering into such a written contract with Board
of Trade Clearing Corporation. Our unwillingness or inability to enter into a
written contract with Board of Trade Clearing Corporation, or some other entity
which would provide comparable clearing-related services to CBOT subsidiary,
could materially adversely affect our business.
100
Other Business Relationships and Subsidiaries
Ceres Trading Limited Partnership. The Ceres Trading Limited Partnership is
a Delaware limited partnership, which we formed in 1992 to initiate the
development of our electronic trading system. Ceres currently owns rights to
electronic trading of the CBOT's products, including on the a/c/e system. It
has entered into contractual arrangements with us for the provision of services
in connection with the operation of the system and the provision of related
support services. We currently charge Ceres the fair value for these services.
In addition, we have entered into an agreement with Ceres whereby we pay Ceres
a licensing fee to provide our members and delegates access to the a/c/e
system. This licensing fee is about equal to the exchange fees received by us
as a result of transactions executed on the a/c/e system.
Our wholly owned subsidiary, eCBOT, is currently the general partner of
Ceres. In addition, as of June 30, 2001, Ceres had 3,619 owners of its Class A
limited partnership interests, of which there are four series, and 60 owners of
its Class B limited partnership interests. The following table indicates the
number of limited partnership interests held by the CBOT members as of June 30,
2001:
Ceres Limited Partnership Interests By Individual Membership Class
Class A-1 Class A-2 Class A-3 Class A-4 Class B
Limited Limited Limited Limited Limited
Partnership Partnership Partnership Partnership Partnership
Membership Class Interests Interests Interests Interests Interests
---------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Full.................... 1,389 -- -- -- --
Associate............... -- 786 -- -- --
GIM..................... -- -- 160 -- --
IDEM.................... -- -- -- 641 --
COM..................... -- -- -- 643 --
Clearing Member......... -- -- -- -- 60
----- --- --- ----- ---
Total................. 1,389 786 160 1,284 60
===== === === ===== ===
Except for a nominal number of interests held by the eCBOT, Class A limited
partnership interests are generally held by individual CBOT members. Class B
limited partnership interests are held by CBOT clearing member firms.
Ceres's wholly owned subsidiary, Ceres Alliance L.L.C., holds the CBOT's 50%
interest in CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company.
The other member of CBOT/Eurex Alliance is Eurex Beteiligungen AG, a Swiss
company owned by Deutsche Borse AG and the Swiss Stock Exchange. CBOT/Eurex
Alliance does not presently employ its own staff, and operates with personnel
seconded to it by the CBOT and the Eurex Group. Generally, the voting rights,
percentage interests and profits of the CBOT/Eurex Alliance are shared equally
between its two members, the Ceres Alliance L.L.C. and Eurex Beteiligungen AG,
and its expenses are allocated among the members as incurred. The CBOT and the
Eurex Group have agreed to suspend cost-sharing arrangements for CBOT/Eurex
Alliance L.L.C.
101
The following chart illustrates the current structure of the CBOT/Eurex
Alliance:
[CHART]
[SWISS [DEUTSCHE [CBOT NON- [CBOT
STOCK _ BORSE CLEARING _ CLEARING
EXCHANGE] AG] MEMBERS] MEMBERS]
[EUREX [DEUTSCHE [CBOT]
ZURICH BORSE [OTHER SUBSIDIARIES]
AG] SYSTEMS [E-CBOT]
AG]
[EUREX [EUREX
FRANKFURT BETEILIGUNGEN [CERES TRADING
AG] AG] LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP]
[EUREX
CLEARING [CERES ALLIANCE
AG] LLC]
[CBOT/EUREX
ALLIANCE
LLC]
As part of the restructuring transactions, we will reorganize our electronic
trading business, part of which is currently operated by Ceres. In order to
accomplish this reorganization, Ceres will be consolidated into the CBOT
subsidiary. Following the reorganization of our electronic trading business,
our eCBOT subsidiary will hold our interest in the CBOT/Eurex Alliance and the
a/c/e software.
The following chart illustrates the anticipated structure of the CBOT/Eurex
Alliance following completion of the restructuring transactions:
[CHART]
[SWISS [DEUTSCHE [CBOT NON- [CBOT
STOCK BORSE CLEARING CLEARING
EXCHANGE] - AG] MEMBERS] - MEMBERS]
[EUREX [DEUTSCHE [CBOT
ZURICH BORSE HOLDINGS]
AG] SYSTEMS
AG] [CBOT]
[OTHER SUBSIDIARIES]
[EUREX [EUREX [E-CBOT]
FRANKFURT BETEILIGUNGEN
AG] AG] [CERES ALLIANCE
LLC]
[EUREX
CLEARING [CBOT/EUREX
AG] ALLIANCE
LLC]
For more information regarding the reorganization of the electronic trading
business, see "The Restructuring Transactions--Description of the Restructuring
Transactions--Reorganization of Our Electronic Trading Business."
MidAmerica Commodity Exchange. The MidAmerica Commodity Exchange, a wholly
owned subsidiary of the CBOT since 1986, is the designated contract market for
open outcry trading of smaller versions of certain
102
futures and options on futures contracts currently traded at the CBOT, Chicago
Mercantile Exchange and the New York Mercantile Exchange. On June 12, 2001, the
CBOT's board approved a plan to to redesignate certain futures and options on
futures contracts currently traded as the MidAmerica Exchange as CBOT contracts
and to make such redesignated contracts available for electronic trading. We
currently expect this plan to be implemented prior to completion of the
restructuring transactions.
Single-Stock Futures Joint Venture. The CBOT recently agreed to become a
minority interest holder in a joint venture formed by Chicago Board Options
Exchange and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. The joint venture will be a for-
profit company that will facilitate the electronic trading of single-stock
futures.
Intellectual Property
We regard our brand name and logos and substantial portions of our marketing
elements, products, market data, software and technology as proprietary, and we
attempt to protect these elements by relying on trademark, service mark,
copyright and trade secret laws, contracts, restrictions on disclosure and
other methods. For example, with respect to trademarks, we currently have
registered marks in more than 15 countries.
We are undertaking a review of our intellectual property to identify
property and methods of doing business which should be protected, as well as
the extent of current protection for that property and the availability of
additional protection. We believe that our various trade and service marks have
been registered where needed. Recent legal developments allowing patent
protection for methods of doing business hold the possibility of additional
protection, which we are examining.
Employees
As of June 30, 2001, we had 700 full-time employees and 20 part-time
employees. These numbers do not include 53 full-time employees of C-B-T
Corporation, our subsidiary engaged in managing our properties, which operates
the CBOT building located at 141 West Jackson Boulevard.
We consider our relations with our employees to be good. Forty-three of the
53 C-B-T Corporation employees are represented by one of the following unions:
. Chicago & North East Illinois District Council of Carpenters;
. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America;
. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399, AFL-CIO; and
. Local 73, General Service Employees Union, SEIU, AFL-CIO.
On September 21, 2001, we reduced our staffing by eliminating 51 positions.
Facilities
Our principal executive offices are located at 141 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Our telephone number is (312) 435-3500.
We own the three buildings located at the property at 141 West Jackson
Boulevard, which consists of a total of about 1,523,077 square feet. We occupy
about 406,795 square feet of office, trading floor and support space. We lease
the remaining space in this building to third parties. The trading area has
state-of-the-art wallboard price display systems, order routing and
communications systems.
In addition, we lease 2,053 square feet of office space at 1455 Pennsylvania
N.W. in Washington, D.C. This space houses our government relations operations.
The current lease on the Washington office space expired on January 31, 2001
and is currently being renewed on a month-to-month basis. We currently expect
that this lease will be renegotiated on terms satisfactory to us.
We lease 1,800 square feet of office space at 52-54 Gracechurch Street in
London, England, which is used by our European marketing staff. The current
lease on the London office expires on June 2004.
We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current operations and
that additional space can be obtained if needed.
103
Regulation
Regulation of the U.S. Futures Exchange Industry
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation by the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission under the Commodity Exchange Act. The Commodity Exchange Act
generally requires that futures trading in commodities be conducted on a
commodity exchange designated as a contract market by the CFTC. That act
establishes non-financial criteria for an exchange to be designated to list
futures and options contracts. Designation as a contract market for the trading
of a specified futures contract is non-exclusive. This means that the CFTC may
designate additional exchanges as contract markets for trading the same or
similar contracts. For information regarding the CFTC approvals required as a
condition to our obligation to complete the restructuring transactions, see
"The Restructuring Transactions--Regulatory Matters."
We are a self-regulatory organization that is subject to the oversight of
the CFTC. In order to guard against default risk with respect to contracts
traded on the CBOT, we have instituted detailed risk management policies and
procedures. To manage the risk of financial non-performance, we have
established minimum capital requirements for all futures commission merchant
member firms. In addition we operate and maintain systems to:
. ensure that futures commission merchant members maintain capital in
excess of the risk based capital requirement adopted by the Board to
Trade Clearing Corporation;
. require that all clearing futures commission merchant member firms
electronically file a financial statement each month. All other futures
commission merchant members must electronically file quarterly financial
statements. Firms are placed on additional reporting, i.e., daily, weekly
or monthly reporting, when necessary;
. analyze futures commission merchant member firms financial statements
with a state-of-the computer system designed to immediately detect
financial violations and unfavorable financial trends;
. require that all futures commission merchant member firms collect initial
and variation margin from their customers;
. on a daily basis, collect large trader information to determine those
firms which may have increased financial exposure and, whenever
necessary, the CBOT will contact firms to ensure financial compliance;
. during volatile market conditions, simulate the effect of market moves on
large trader positions in order to identify those firms that have
increased risk exposure; and
. exercise broad disciplinary authority over member firms including the
ability to issue fines in the case of serious rule violations, and in the
case of a financially distressed firm, we may take various emergency
actions to protect customers, other member firms and the CBOT.
We also have surveillance and compliance operations and procedures to monitor
and enforce compliance with rules pertaining to the trading, position sizes,
delivery obligations and financial condition of members.
Changes in Existing Laws and Rules
Additional legislation or regulation, or changes in existing laws and rules
or their interpretation, may directly affect our mode of operation and our
profitability. Congress has recently adopted amendments to the Commodity
Exchange Act that will reduce the cost and burdens of listing new contracts for
trading. The CFTC has adopted rules to implement those changes. Other
amendments to the Commodity Exchange Act have been adopted by Congress that
might be less favorable to our business. The regulations under which we have
operated since 1974 have been changed in a manner that will permit unregulated
competitors and competitors in other regulated industries to attempt to trade
our products in their own trading facilities without the same regulatory costs
we bear.
104
The Commodity Exchange Act generally requires all futures contracts to be
executed on an exchange that has been approved by the CFTC. For many years, the
exchange trading requirement was modified by CFTC regulations to permit
privately negotiated swap contracts to be transacted in the over-the-counter
market. The CFTC exemption, under which the over-the-counter derivative market
operated, precluded the over-the-counter market from using exchange-like
electronic transaction systems and clearing unless specific permission,
including the imposition of specific conditions, was granted by the CFTC. These
limitations on the exemptions granted to the over-the-counter market were
called into question by a November 1999 report of the President's Working Group
on Financial Markets, which is made up of the Treasury Secretary, the Chairmen
of the SEC, the CFTC and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
The working group advocated a complete exemption from the Commodity Exchange
Act for some principal-to-principal derivative exchanges that provide
electronic trade execution services comparable to those performed by us. The
customers who may access those exempt exchanges are also significant customers
of regulated exchanges like ours. The working group recommended equivalent
treatment for the existing electronic markets operated by regulated exchanges
or their affiliates and further recommended legislation that would permit CFTC-
regulated clearing organizations to clear futures, options on futures contracts
and OTC derivatives that are not securities or securities options. In contrast,
the working group recommended permitting banks and SEC-regulated clearing
organizations to clear financial derivative contracts, as well as equities,
government securities, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements and other
instruments. Finally, the working group recommended permitting banks and
broker-dealers, and their affiliates, to operate currency futures markets for
retail customers without being subject to regulation under the Commodity
Exchange Act. All of the working group proposals, if adopted, would likely
increase the number and quality of competitors who provide execution and
clearing services for standardized derivative contracts.
In February 2000, the CFTC staff released a report advocating the passage of
broad regulatory exemptions to create a regulatory environment that would
permit the futures industry to accommodate itself to real world competitive
conditions. Its goal is regulation by oversight rather than prescription. The
degree of regulation proposed is directly related to the characteristics of the
product and the type of customer that has direct or indirect access to the
market, with retail customer markets being subject to greater regulation. The
CFTC's proposal would treat open outcry markets and electronic trading market
in the same way.
During 2000, Congress considered legislation to implement the suggestions of
the working group and the CFTC. On October 19, 2000, the U.S. House of
Representatives passed that legislation in a bill numbered H.R. 4541, by a vote
of 377 to 4. Further amendments were made to that bill and, as amended, it was
reintroduced in the House of Representatives as H.R. 5660 on December 14, 2000.
The U.S. House of Representatives and Senate each passed H.R. 5660 on December
15, 2000. It was signed into law by President William J. Clinton on December
21, 2000 as the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000.
The Commodity Futures Modernization Act provides a series of exclusions from
the Commodity Exchange Act that would allow our competitors to trade futures
contracts identical to the ones that we offer without any form of regulation or
oversight by the CFTC under certain circumstances. Generally those exclusions
are available to markets limited to financial products traded among
institutions, whether traded electronically or not. We too could comply with
those exclusions and operate markets that are outside CFTC jurisdiction. If we
chose to remain subject to CFTC jurisdiction, the Commodity Futures
Modernization Act replaces the current rigid and rigorous statutory
requirements exchanges now face with flexible core principles that exchanges--
called contract markets or derivatives transaction execution facilities--would
need to satisfy subject to CFTC oversight. In addition, if we elect to trade
our non-agricultural contracts on the derivatives transaction execution
facility platform, banks and broker-dealers would become qualified to act as a
sales force for our contracts, thus expanding our sales force substantially.
Finally, the Commodity Futures Modernization Act lifts the current ban on
trading in single-stock futures subject to the coordinated oversight of the
CFTC and SEC, providing U.S. futures exchanges with the opportunity to compete
for this new market.
105
The Commodity Futures Modernization Act's new regulatory framework for
exchanges could reduce our regulatory costs and enhance our ability to deliver
cost-effective services to our customers. The new framework will also make it
easier for others to compete with us at lower regulatory cost. Thus, the
regulatory framework may provide greater regulatory advantages for some of our
competitors than it does for us.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings and litigation
arising in the ordinary course of business. As of the date of this document,
except as described below, we are not a party to any litigation or other legal
proceeding that, in our opinion, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results or financial condition.
Minority Member Litigation. On August 11, 2000, eight Associate Members,
GIMs, IDEMs and COMs filed a complaint, on behalf of themselves and seeking to
represent a class of all Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs, with the
Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. The complaint names as defendants five
persons holding Full Memberships owned by corporations with multiple Full
Memberships in the CBOT and seeks a defendant class of all Full Members.
The complaint alleges that the allocation developed by our Independent
Allocation Committee is unfair and the allocation methodology used by the
Independent Allocation Committee improperly weights members' voting and
liquidation rights as well as the historical distribution of market values of
memberships. The plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that the allocation is
unfair to Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs, and that the vote of Full
Members in favor of the allocation in connection with the restructuring
transactions would constitute a breach of fiduciary duties allegedly owed by
Full Members to Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs. The complaint requests
that the court enjoin Full Members from voting in favor of the allocation and
declare a fair and equitable allocation of shares pursuant to the restructuring
transactions. The CBOT has assumed the defense of the Full Members named as
defendants in the complaint.
On January 9, 2001, the defendants moved to dismiss the case on the grounds
that the complaint did not sufficiently allege that the defendants would breach
any fiduciary duties to Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs by voting in
favor of the restructuring. On January 25, 2001, the circuit court denied
defendants' motions to dismiss without ruling on the merits of the dispute,
including whether Full Members owe fiduciary duties to plaintiffs or whether
the allocation is actually unfair. On February 6, 2001, a motion to compel
arbitration under the CBOT rules and regulations, which provide for arbitration
of disputes between members at the CBOT, and to stay the proceedings in
Illinois court was filed on behalf of individual defendant Steinborn. On
February 8, 2001, a similar motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings
was filed on behalf of the additional individual defendants. On March 23, 2001,
the circuit court granted the defendants' motions to compel arbitration and
stay proceedings. On April 20, 2001, the plaintiffs filed an appeal of the
circuit court's order granting the defendant's motion to compel arbitration. To
date, the Illinois Appellate Court has not decided the appeal.
We have met with counsel for the plaintiffs to discuss settlement of this
proceeding. To date, no agreement with respect to settlement of this matter has
been reached and we cannot provide any assurance that any settlement will ever
be reached.
Although we believe that the plaintiffs' position is without merit, we
cannot provide any assurances as to the outcome of the arbitration or that the
plaintiffs will not succeed in preventing or delaying the vote which is the
subject of this proxy solicitation or in altering the proposed allocation of
equity in the restructuring transactions. Additionally, we cannot assure you
that the plaintiffs will not attempt to pursue other remedies, such as damages,
in the event that the restructuring transactions are completed on the terms
proposed in this document. For more information, see "Risk Factors--Risks
Relating to the Restructuring Transactions--Certain Members Have Filed a
Complaint in Illinois State Court Challenging the Proposed Allocation of Equity
in the CBOT" and "--The Allocation of the Equity in CBOT Holdings Contains an
Element of Uncertainty."
106
Chicago Board Options Exchange Dispute. Since 1972, when we created the
Chicago Board Options Exchange, our Full Members have had a legal right to
become members of that exchange without having to purchase a membership
pursuant to the exercise right. Over the last year or more, the Chicago Board
Options Exchange has stated publicly its view that, if consummated, the
restructuring transactions would extinguish the exercise right under certain
circumstances.
In response, on June 30, 2000, we filed a complaint against the Chicago
Board Options Exchange seeking declaratory and injunctive relief with respect
to our Delaware reincorporation. Specifically, we sought a declaration that
becoming a Delaware not-for-profit corporation would not violate a 1992
agreement between the parties or serve to extinguish the exercise right of our
Full Members. On August 3, 2000, after the Chicago Board Options Exchange
agreed in court that it would take no action to extinguish or limit the
exercise right based solely on the reincorporation of the CBOT in Delaware, the
court dismissed the CBOT's complaint. On August 30, 2000, the Chicago Board
Options Exchange filed a proposed rule change with the Securities and Exchange
Commission consisting of a proposed interpretation of the exercise right. On
October 10, 2000, the Chicago Board Options Exchange filed an amendment to its
proposed rule change and interpretation and sought SEC approval of its
position. In its filing, the Chicago Board Options Exchange stated that the
exercise right would be terminated:
. for any Full Member, if that Full Member sells or otherwise transfers
any of the stock and other interests received as a result of completing
the restructuring transactions in exchange for his or her Full
Membership;
. for all Full Members, if the CBOT by expanding electronic trading on the
a/c/e system or otherwise, allows non-members to trade directly on the
CBOT on the same basis as members; or
. for all Full Members, if CBOT members who exercise their right to become
members of the Chicago Board Options Exchange are able to trade all of
the CBOT's products and the Chicago Board Options Exchange's products
simultaneously.
On October 17, 2000, the CBOT filed a second complaint seeking a declaration
that the restructuring transactions would not extinguish the exercise right and
an injunction prohibiting the Chicago Board Options Exchange from taking any
action to the contrary. On January 19, 2001, the Illinois Circuit Court
dismissed Count I of our complaint for failure to sufficiently allege breach of
the 1992 agreement by the Chicago Board Options Exchange and for failure to
allege damages. The court also dismissed Count II of the complaint as preempted
by federal law, holding that this matter should be resolved in the first
instance by the SEC. The court's ruling did not address the merits of the
dispute, including whether or not the Chicago Board Options Exchange's position
breaches the 1992 agreement. Under this ruling, the SEC would have been free to
determine whether the Chicago Board Options Exchange could take the actions
described above with respect to the exercise right in connection with its
proposed rule change and interpretation filed with the SEC. In response, on
February 16, 2001, the CBOT filed an amended complaint, seeking a declaration
by the court that the Chicago Board Options Exchange breached the 1992
agreement by adopting its proposed rule change and submitting it to the SEC for
approval without the written consent of the CBOT. In addition, the CBOT sought
an injunction prohibiting the Chicago Board Options Exchange from attempting to
amend or modify its Rule 3.16(b), relating to the exercise right, adopted
pursuant to the 1992 agreement, without our written consent, in violation of
its obligations' under the 1992 agreement. Finally, the CBOT sought a
declaration that certain elements of its proposed restructuring comply with the
CBOT's obligations under the 1992 agreement.
On November 17, 2000, the SEC requested public comment on the Chicago Board
Options Exchange's proposed rule change. On December 11, 2000 we filed a
comment letter with the SEC challenging the legal validity of the proposed rule
change and urging the SEC not to approve it. On February 12, 2001, we filed a
supplementary comment letter with the SEC summarizing the proposed
restructuring transactions and notifying the SEC of developments at the
Illinois Circuit Court.
107
On February 26, 2001, the Chicago Board Options Exchange filed with the SEC
a letter in support of its proposed rule change and in response to our filed
opposition to that proposed rule change. The Chicago Board Option Exchange's
letter took the position that after the restructuring transactions the CBOT
will not be a membership corporation and therefore will not satisfy one of the
conditions for retention of the exercise right under the 1992 agreement. The
Chicago Board Options Exchange further claimed that the a/c/e system gives our
members who exercise the right to become Chicago Board Options Exchange members
the ability to trade on the Chicago Board Options Exchange trading floor and
through the CBOT at the same time, activity that the Chicago Board Options
Exchange claimed is incompatible with the exercise right. The Chicago Board
Options Exchange also claimed that the exercise right may be terminated after
completion of the restructuring transactions because certain non-trading
rights, including voting rights, of the current Full Members of the CBOT will
change in connection with the completion of the restructuring transactions.
In March 2001, representatives of the CBOT initiated discussions with
representatives of the Chicago Board Options Exchange to arrange for a
settlement of this dispute. On March 28, 2001, we entered into an agreement
with the Chicago Board Options Exchange for the purpose of facilitating our
discussions regarding possible settlement of this dispute. Pursuant to this
agreement, the Chicago Board Options Exchange agreed to request that the SEC
refrain from approving the Chicago Board Option Exchange's filing with the SEC
(File No. SR-CBOE-00-44) and the CBOT has agreed not to seek to have the
registration statement of which this document forms a part declared effective
by the SEC, in each case so long as such agreement remains in effect. In
addition, we agreed with the Chicago Board Options Exchange that each party
would file one or more joint requests for an extension of time such that the
Chicago Board Options Exchange's answer or response to the CBOT's amended
complaint in Illinois Circuit Court would not be due any sooner than 14 days
after the termination of the agreement. This agreement remained in effect
through August 1, 2001.
On August 7, 2001, the CBOT entered into an agreement with the Chicago Board
Options Exchange for the stated purpose of resolving the dispute between the
parties regarding the exercise right within the context of the restructuring
transactions and electronic trading generally at the CBOT. Among other things,
the CBOT and the Chicago Board Options Exchange agreed:
. that in order to exercise to become a member at the Chicago Board
Options Exchange, an individual must be the owner (or delegate of such
owner) of (A) 25,000 shares of Class A common stock of the previously
contemplated stock, for-profit CBOT, subject to certain anti-dilution
adjustments, (B) one share of Series B-1, Class B common stock of the
previously contemplated stock, for-profit CBOT and (C) one instrument to
be issued to the 1,402 Full Members, which represents the exercise
right;
. that the CBOT has created and will maintain various incentives to
promote the continued value of CBOT membership, including meaningful
member and delegate fee preferences (applicable to the floor and
electronic trading platform) and pit closing provisions, in each case as
described in this document;
. to submit any questions that may subsequently arise as to the continued
meaningfulness of the preferences and incentives described above to
binding arbitration in accordance with the terms of the August 7, 2001
agreement;
. that if a Full Member of the CBOT delegates his or her membership rights
to an individual who exercises and becomes a member of the Chicago Board
Options Exchange, such Full Member will relinquish all member trading
rights at both the CBOT and Chicago Board Options Exchange and may trade
only as a customer at customer rates at the CBOT unless that Full Member
owns another CBOT membership which entitles that member to member
trading rights and transaction rates;
. that delegates of Full Members of the CBOT who have exercised their
right to trade at the Chicago Board Options Exchange may trade on the
CBOT's electronic trading platform only at customer rates; and
. that if a Full Member of the CBOT is present on the trading floor of the
Chicago Board Options Exchange or is logged on to the Chicago Board
Options Exchange electronic trading platform at the time an order is
entered or altered on the CBOT's electronic trading platform by or on
behalf of such
108
member, then such member will be charged CBOT customer rates for trades
resulting from the execution of such order.
In addition, the CBOT agreed to file a notice of voluntary dismissal of its
litigation in the Illinois Circuit Court relating to the exercise right, which
was filed on August 17, 2001. The Chicago Board Options Exchange agreed that it
will take no action to amend, modify or otherwise limit, or terminate or cause
to expire, whether by interpretation or otherwise, the exercise right as a
result of the completion of the restructuring transactions, except as
contemplated in the settlement agreement.
In addition, the Chicago Board Options Exchange agreed to withdraw and
terminate its proposed rulemaking request, which was done on August 13, 2001.
The August 7, 2001 agreement states that it is subject to a number of
conditions, including, among other things:
. the agreement must be filed with and approved by the SEC;
. the agreement must be approved by the membership of the Chicago Board
Options Exchange;
. the registration statement of which this document is part must be
declared effective by the SEC;
. the Chicago Board Options Exchange must consent to any amendment to the
registration statement of which this document is part;
. the restructuring transactions must be approved by the membership of the
CBOT; and
. the CBOT must receive a favorable ruling from the IRS and any required
approvals by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
On October 24, 2001, the CBOT, CBOT Holdings and the Chicago Board Options
Exchange entered into a letter agreement that, among other things, specified
the terms and conditions under which the August 7, 2001 agreement will apply
upon completion of the restructuring transactions as revised to provide for the
holding company structure. In addition, among other things, the parties agreed
that for purposes of the August 7, 2001 agreement:
. the common stock of CBOT Holdings would correspond to the "Class A
Common Stock" referred to in the August 7, 2001 agreement;
. the Series B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4 and B-5, Class B memberships in the CBOT
subsidiary would correspond to the "Class B Common Stock" or applicable
series thereof referred to in the August 7, 2001 agreement; and
. the Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary would correspond to the
"Exercise Coupon" referred to in the August 7, 2001 agreement.
In a related action, on August 30, 2001, 10 members of the Chicago Board
Options Exchange filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and
preliminary injunction against the Chicago Board Options Exchange and the CBOT,
alleging that the then pending Chicago Board Options Exchange membership vote
on the settlement agreement between the CBOT and the Chicago Board Options
Exchange would breach the 1992 agreement, which includes as a recital article
fifth (b) of the certificate of incorporation of the Chicago Board Options
Exchange. According to plaintiffs, article fifth (b) and the 1992 agreement
require approval of the August 7, 2001 agreement by 80% of members of the
Chicago Board Options Exchange and 80% of CBOT members or their delegates who
have become members of the Chicago Board Options Exchange pursuant to the
exercise right. Plaintiffs asked the court to enjoin approval of the settlement
agreement by members of the Chicago Board Options Exchange and to enjoin the
CBOT and the Chicago Board Options Exchange from enacting the provisions of the
settlement agreement. Both the CBOT and the Chicago Board Options Exchange
filed motions to dismiss, which were granted by the court on September 17,
2001.
109
Notwithstanding entry into the August 7, 2001 agreement and related letter
agreement, we cannot assure you that the Chicago Board Options Exchange will
not take other actions in the future to challenge or interfere with the
exercise right or that it will not otherwise be successful in terminating the
exercise right or preventing Full Members from exercising such right in the
future. For more information about these risks, see "Risk Factors--Risks
Relating to the Restructuring Transactions--The "Exercise Right' Could be
Subject to Further Challenge by the Chicago Board Options Exchange."
You are being asked to ratify the August 7, 2001 agreement entered into by
the CBOT and the Chicago Board Options Exchange. We have included as Appendix
E-1 and E-2 to this document a copy of the August 7, 2001 agreement and related
letter agreement, respectively. We urge you to review carefully both agreements
before voting on the restructuring transactions.
Patent Rights Litigation. On May 5, 1999, the CBOT, the Chicago Mercantile
Exchange, the New York Mercantile Exchange and Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P., were
sued by Electronic Trading Systems, Inc. in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas Division) for alleged infringement
of Wagner United States patent 4,903,201, entitled "Automated Futures Trade
Exchange." On February 1, 2001, the complaint was amended to allege that CBOT
infringed the patent by operating Project A, which we decommissioned in August
2000, as well as the a/c/e system. The district court has recently denied our
motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and our motion to transfer
the case to the Northern District of Illinois. On April 16, 2001, we asserted a
right to be indemnified with respect to this litigation by Eurex Frankfurt AG
in connection with its provision of market supervision services. Eurex has
disputed that obligation. On April 25, 2001, we were advised that an interest
in the patent had been transferred to eSpeed, Inc. On July 5, 2001, the court
allowed eSpeed to join the case as a plaintiff. On October 12, 2001, the court
issued an order interpreting the asserted claims of the Wagner patent.
Soybean Antitrust Litigation. On November 14, 1989, plaintiff Sanner brought
suit against us. This case is pending in federal court in the Northern District
of Illinois, Eastern Division. The one remaining count in this case is an
antitrust claim for monetary damages brought on behalf of a class of soybean
farmers alleging a conspiracy to fix the price of cash soybeans. The claim is
based on an emergency order promulgated by our board of directors in connection
with the July 1989 soybean futures contract. The other defendants in this suit
are certain individuals alleged to have been involved in recommending or
implementing the emergency order. All of the other claims brought in
plaintiff's original complaint, which was filed in 1989, have been dismissed.
The court certified the Sanner case as a class action, but a motion for
reconsideration of this decision is pending. The court denied our motion for
summary judgment but without prejudice to reassert a motion for summary
judgment on the issues of market power and antitrust injury. In September 2001,
the Court issued a ruling with respect to defendants' motion to strike the
testimony of plaintiffs' only expert, Professor Jeffrey Williams. Professor
Williams had opined, among other things, that the July 11, 1989 Emergency Order
had adversely impacted the cash soybean markets from July 12, 1989 through the
month of October 1989. The Court, however, limited such testimony to no later
than the month of July 1989 (if not the expiration of the July soybean futures
contract on July 20, 1989). Fact and expert discovery has been completed. No
trial date has been set by the court.
110
MANAGEMENT AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Directors and Executive Officers
The board of directors currently consists of 18 directors, including:
. the chairman of the board;
. the vice chairman of the board;
. nine elected directors who are Full Members and of whom at least two are
nonresident;
. four non-member directors nominated and approved by the board of
directors;
. two elected directors who are Associate Members; and
. the president and chief executive officer, who serves as a non-voting
member of the board.
Currently, there is one vacant non-member directorship.
On October 16, 2001, our board of directors approved and adopted amendments
to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which, if approved by our
members, would authorize our board of directors to delay the next annual
election, which is currently scheduled for December 2001, until no later than
March 31, 2002, reduce the size of our board of directors from 18 members to
nine members at the first annual election following timely approval of the
restructuring transactions by our members, clarify our board of directors'
discretion as to the timing of its regular meetings and make certain other
conforming changes. A special meeting of the members for the purpose of voting
on such amendments has been scheduled for October 31, 2001. If our members
approve such amendments and separately approve the restructuring transactions
in a timely manner, our board of directors will be reduced in size from 18
directors to nine directors in connection with the next annual election, which
will be held as soon as reasonably practicable following membership approval of
the restructuring transactions, but in no event later than March 31, 2002. At
such annual election, our members will elect eight new directors to serve on
the nine-member board of directors with the then current chairman of the board
continuing to serve in such capacity as the ninth member of such board. Upon
completion of the restructuring transactions, the new directors elected to
serve on the nine-member board of directors will continue to serve on the
boards of directors of both CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary until the
next annual meeting of each such corporation.
If the amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not
approved by our members or the membership vote on the restructuring
transactions does not occur in a timely manner, and, as a result, the size of
our board of directors is not reduced from 18 directors to nine directors prior
to the completion of the restructuring transactions, the certificate of
incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings will provide that the then current
18-member board of directors will continue as the boards of directors of CBOT
Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary immediately following completion of the
restructuring transactions. The size of the board of directors of CBOT Holdings
will thereafter be reduced to nine directors in connection with a special
meeting of stockholders, to be held as soon as reasonably practicable following
completion of the restructuring transactions. At such special meeting, the
stockholders will elect eight new directors to serve on the nine-member board
of directors with the then current chairman of the board continuing to serve in
such capacity as the ninth member of such board. In connection with the
election of directors to the new nine-member board of directors of CBOT
Holdings, it is anticipated that CBOT Holdings, as the sole Class A member of
the CBOT subsidiary, will elect each of the newly-elected directors serving on
the nine-member board of directors of CBOT Holdings as directors of the CBOT
subsidiary. Each director of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary will be
elected to serve as a director until the next annual meeting of each such
corporation and will not be subject to term limits.
In order to ensure that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings is generally
identical in size and composition to the board of directors of the CBOT
subsidiary, it will be a qualification for service as a director of the CBOT
subsidiary that such director also serve on the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings. The nine-member boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary will each consist of:
. the chairman of the board;
. five directors who are Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary;
111
. two directors who are "independent" within the meaning of the certificate
of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings; and
. one director who is "at-large," or generally not subject to
qualifications.
We currently expect that the president and chief executive officer of CBOT
Holdings will be nominated for election as the at-large director.
Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the persons currently
serving as directors and executive officers of each of CBOT Holdings and the
CBOT. As described above, immediately following completion of the restructuring
transactions, the boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary
will consist of the members of the board of directors of the CBOT immediately
prior to completion of the restructuring transactions. We currently expect
that, subject to resignation or removal, the current executive officers of each
of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT will continue to serve as executive officers of
CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary, respectively, immediately following
completion of the restructuring transactions; however we can provide no
assurances in this regard.
CBOT Holdings
Name Age Positions Held
---- --- --------------
David J. Vitale 54 President and Chief Executive Officer and
Director
Carol A. Burke 50 Executive Vice President and General
Counsel
Bernard W. Dan 40 Executive Vice President
William M. Farrow III 46 Executive Vice President
Glen M. Johnson 53 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Nicholas J. Neubauer 55 Chairman of the Board of Directors
CBOT
Name Age Positions Held
---- --- --------------
David J. Vitale 54 President and Chief Executive Officer
Carol A. Burke 50 Executive Vice President and General
Counsel
Bernard W. Dan 40 Executive Vice President
William M. Farrow III 46 Executive Vice President
Glen M. Johnson 53 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Philip P. Hannigan 62 Senior Vice President, Real Estate
Operations
Bryan T. Durkin 41 Senior Vice President Open Outcry
Celesta S. Jurkovich 55 Senior Vice President, Government Relations
Mary McDonnell 46 Senior Vice President, Screen Based Trading
Nickolas J. Neubauer 55 Chairman of the Board of Directors
Charles P. Carey 48 Vice Chairman
Raymond Cahnman 55 Director
James E. Cashman 48 Director
Mark E. Cermak 49 Director
Robert F. Corvino 44 Director
James F. Curley 56 Director
Andrew J. Filipowski 51 Director
Douglas M. Kurzydlo 47 Director
Veda Kaufman Levin 54 Director
James P. McMillin 42 Director
Joseph Niciforo 41 Director
James R. Thompson 65 Director
J. Andrew Wallace 40 Director
Michael D. Walter 52 Director
Ralph H. Weems 69 Director
112
Set forth below is a description of the backgrounds of the persons named in
the tables above.
David J. Vitale has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since
February 2001. Prior to joining the CBOT, Mr. Vitale served as a director and
Vice Chairman of Bank One Corporation from October 1998 until November 1999 and
as a director and Vice Chairman of First Chicago NBD Corporation from October
1995 until the merger of Bank One Corporation and First Chicago NBD Corporation
in October 1998. Prior to that time, he served in a number of different
capacities with First Chicago Corporation and The First National Bank of
Chicago.
Carol A. Burke has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel
since February 1995 and Senior Vice President and General Counsel since April
1994. Prior to that time, Ms. Burke held other positions in the President's
office and the Legal Department of the CBOT.
Bernard W. Dan has served as an Executive Vice President since July 2001.
From 1995 until July 2001, Mr. Dan worked in a number of different senior
capacities for Cargill Investor Services Inc. and its affiliates, including,
Asia Pacific Regional Head, Head of Global Execution and, most recently,
President.
William M. Farrow III has served as an Executive Vice President since July
2001. From 1996 until July 2001, Mr. Farrow served as Senior Vice President for
Bank One Corp. As Senior Vice President his responsibilities included
eCommerce/eBusiness management, technology sales management and technology
platform development and conversion.
Glen M. Johnson has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer since February 1995. From December 1982 to February 1995, he was Vice
President and Treasurer of the CBOT.
Philip F. Hannigan has served as Senior Vice President, Real Estate
Operations since February 1995. From May 1984 to February 1995, he served as
Vice President, Real Estate Operations.
Bryan T. Durkin has served as Senior Vice President, Open Outcry since June
2001. Prior to that, Mr. Durkin served as Senior Vice President and
Administrator, Office of Investigations & Audits and Order Routing from
February 2000 to June 2001. From December 1999 to February 2000, Mr. Durkin
served as Senior Vice President, Office of Investigations & Audits. From
December 1993 through December 1999, he served as Vice President & Deputy
Administrator, Office of Investigations & Audits.
Celesta S. Jurkovich has served as Senior Vice President, Government
Relations of the CBOT since February 1995. Prior to that time, she served as
Vice President, Government Relations.
Mary McDonnell has served as Senior Vice President, Screen Based Trading of
the CBOT since June 2001. From July 2000 to June 2001, Ms. McDonnell served as
Vice President, CBOT/Eurex Alliance. Prior to joining the CBOT in May 2000 as
Project Manager and Managing Director of the CBOT/Eurex Alliance, Ms. McDonnell
served as the Executive Vice President of the Bermuda Commodities Exchange from
1997 through 1999 where her responsibilities included the development,
implementation and operation of the first Internet-based electronic futures
exchange. From 1979 through 1996, Ms. McDonnell served as the Chief Financial
and Operating Officer of Griffin Trading, a global futures clearing firm, as
well as President of Griffin Asset Management Int'l. Ltd., an asset allocation
firm in the futures industry.
Nickolas J. Neubauer has served as Chairman of the CBOT since January 2001.
He has been an independent trader on the CBOT since February 1978. He is the
President of Sano Corporation, an Arizona real estate corporation that he
founded in 1991. He owns two Full Memberships in the CBOT and one CBOE
membership.
Charles P. Carey has served as a director since 1997 and Vice Chairman since
January 2000. He also serves on the Finance, Executive and Human Resources
Committees. He is the Managing Member of RCH Trading LLC, a registered broker-
dealer. Mr. Carey holds one Full Membership in the CBOT and is a partner at
Henning & Carey, a commodity trading firm.
113
Raymond Cahnman has served as a director since January 2000. Mr. Cahnman has
been a trader on the CBOT for the previous five years, and he currently trades
with TransMarket Group L.L.C., a clearing firm. Mr. Cahman holds, directly or
indirectly, by virtue of his controlling interest in TransMarket Group L.L.C.,
three Full Memberships, six Associate Memberships, eight GIMs, five IDEMs and
four COMs.
James E. Cashman has served as a director since January 1996, and is a
member of the board's Finance Committee. He has been an independent trader on
the CBOT since July 1977. Mr. Cashman also is a member of RCH Trading LLC, a
registered broker-dealer. Mr. Cashman holds one Full Membership in the CBOT.
Mark Cermak has served as a director since January 2000, and is a member of
the Regulatory Compliance Committee and the Chairman of the Membership
Committee and the Joint CBOE/CBOT Advisory Committee. He is currently a
President of O'Connor & Co. LLC, a clearing member of the CBOT, a position he
has held since January 1995. Mr. Cermak is a director of the New England Grain
and Feed Council and holds one Full Membership in the CBOT.
Robert F. Corvino has served as a director since January 2000. He is also a
member of the Finance Committee and the Floor Financial Committee, of which he
is the Chairman. Mr. Corvino is a member of RCH Trading LLC, a registered
broker-dealer. From November 1985 to May 2000, Mr. Corvino was an independent
trader. He holds one Full Membership in the CBOT.
James F. Curley has served as a director since January 1993, and is on the
Executive, Finance and Human Resources Committees. Since April 1997, Mr. Curley
has been the Chief Executive Officer of Cresvale International (US) LLC, a
futures commission merchant. From March 1994 through June 1996, he was Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Republic New York Securities Inc. He holds one
Full Membership in the CBOT.
Andrew J. Filipowski has served as a director since January 2000. Mr.
Filipowski is the founder and, since June 1999, has been the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of divine, inc., a Chicago-based enterprise Web solutions
company. Founded in 1999, divine is focused on developing and marketing
critical software infrastructure and technology solutions for enterprises
worldwide, as well as the integration, training and sales and marketing
services to support those solutions. divine also holds interests in various
companies that are principally involved in integrated solutions for e-commerce
and vertical markets. Prior to June 1999, Mr. Filipowski was Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of PLATINUM technology international,
inc., a software services company. He is a director of Blue Rhino Corp., a
propane cylinder exchange distributor and eShare Technologies, a provider of
contract management software solutions.
Douglas M. Kurzydlo has served as a director since January 1996. For the
previous twenty years, he has been an independent broker/trader on the CBOT. He
serves on the board's Executive, Audit, Regulatory Compliance, Appellate and
Finance Committees. He owns one Full Membership in the CBOT.
Veda Kaufman Levin has served as a director since January 2000. She has been
the Group Vice President--Department of Futures Sales at ABN/AMRO, NA.
Incorporated since February 2001. From March 1994 to February 2001, Ms. Kaufman
Levin served as a Senior Vice President of Lazard Freres & Co. Ms. Kaufman
Levin serves on the Implementation Committee of the Board and on the Lessor
Committee, of which she is the Chairperson. She holds one Full Membership in
the CBOT.
James Patrick McMillin has served as a director since January 2000, and is
the Co-Chairman of the Floor Members Committee. He is currently an Area
Director for CSI, Inc., a software engineering company. From August 2000 to
July 2001 Mr. McMillin served as an Account Sales Manager at Comdisco Inc., a
provider of equipment leasing and network services, data protection and
financial and technology management. Prior to that, Mr. McMillin traded
financial futures at the CBOT. Mr. McMillin is a director of Hinsdale Bank and
Trust, a community bank, and holds one Associate Membership in the CBOT.
114
Joseph Niciforo has served as a director since January 1999. He is also a
member of the Finance Committee. Since June 2000, he has been Managing Director
of Fixed Income for Tudor Investment Corp., a hedge fund. From March 1997 to
June 2000, Mr. Niciforo was President of Bearcat Capital, a commodities trading
firm. From January 1990 to December 1996, Mr. Niciforo was a partner in Tudor
Investment Corp. Mr. Niciforo holds one Full Membership and one Associate
Membership in the CBOT.
James Robert Thompson, Jr., has served as a director since February 1991.
Governor Thompson has been the Chairman of the law firm of Winston & Strawn, a
national law firm that acts as counsel for the Independent Allocation Committee
of our board of directors, since January 1991. From January 1977 to January
1991, he was the Governor of the State of Illinois. He serves on the Audit and
Human Resources Committees and is Chairman of the Independent Allocation
Committee of our board of directors. Governor Thompson is a director of
Jefferson Smurfit Group, Plc, an integrated producer of packaging products; FMC
Corporation, a diversified chemicals company; FMC Technologies, Inc., a
manufacturer of products utilized in the oil and gas industry; Hollinger
International Inc., a newspaper publisher; Prime Retail, Inc., a real estate
investment trust specializing in factory outlet centers; Prime Group Realty
Trust, a real estate investment trust focused on industrial properties;
MAXIMUS, Inc., a consulting company.
John Andrew Wallace has served as a director since January 1999, and is a
member of the Executive, Finance, and Human Resources Committees. He has served
as Managing Director of Sales at R.J. O'Brien & Associates since February 1999.
From August 1984 to January 1999, Mr. Wallace was Senior Vice President of
Sales at Salomon Smith Barney, a financial services company. He owns one
Associate Membership in the CBOT, and R.J. O'Brien & Associates holds three
Full Memberships in the CBOT.
Michael D. Walter has served as a director since January 2000, and is a
member of the Audit Committee. Since October 1996, he has been Senior Vice
President, Commodity Procurement and Economic Strategies of ConAgra Foods, Inc.
From February 1989 to September 1996, Mr. Walter was President of ConAgra
Specialty Grain Cos. Mr. Walter is Chairman of the Board of European Oat
Millers, an oat milling company, and a director of ConAgra Malt, a worldwide
manufacturer of malt. ConAgra holds one Full Membership in the CBOT.
Ralph Weems has served as a director since January 1990 and previously
served as a director from January 1985 to January 1988. He serves as the
Chairman of our Audit Committee and as a member of the Independent Allocation
Committee of the board of directors. Mr. Weems has owned and operated an
independent farm since June 1955.
Committees of the Board of Directors
It is currently expected that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings will
have a nominating committee, an executive committee, an audit committee and a
compensation committee. It is currently expected that the members of these
committees will be elected by CBOT Holdings' board of directors following the
effectiveness of the restructuring transactions. Each of these committees is
described in more detail below.
Nominating Committee
It is currently expected that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings will
have a nominating committee consisting of four members who will be directors
elected by the board to serve on such committee. We currently expect that the
nominating committee will initially include the chairman of the board, one
independent director and, if serving on the board, the chief executive officer.
This committee will review the qualifications of potential candidates and will
propose to the then-sitting board of directors for their review and approval
nominees for vacant positions or positions expected to be vacant on the board
of directors, including the eight positions expected to be filled in connection
with the special election following completion of the restructuring
transactions.
115
Executive Committee
It is currently expected that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings will
have an executive committee consisting of directors elected by the board to
serve on such committee. The Executive Committee will exercise the authority of
the full board of directors when the board is not in session, except as
required by the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of CBOT Holdings or
applicable law.
Audit Committee
It is currently expected that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings will
have an audit committee consisting of three members who will be directors
elected by the board to serve on such committee. We currently expect that the
audit committee will initially include the two independent directors. This
committee will review the results and scope of the audit and other services
provided by the independent auditors as well as the accounting and internal
control procedures and policies of CBOT Holdings.
Compensation Committee
It is currently expected that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings will
have a compensation committee consisting of three members who will be directors
elected by the board to serve on such committee. We currently expect that the
compensation committee will initially include the two independent directors. It
will oversee the compensation and benefits of CBOT Holdings' and its
subsidiaries' management and employees.
Other Committees
In addition to these committees, it is currently expected that CBOT Holdings
and the CBOT subsidiary will create or maintain certain non-board advisory
bodies and other non-board committees comprised of directors, officers and
stockholders or members, as appropriate.
Director Compensation
We currently expect that each independent director of CBOT Holdings will
receive an annual fee of $40,000, plus a meeting attendance fee of $1,500 for
each regular meeting of the board that they attend. We currently expect that
the annual fee for independent directors may be paid in equal parts cash and
shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings. The shares of common stock may, at the
election of such director, be paid on a deferred basis. All directors of CBOT
Holdings will receive reimbursement of expenses for travel to meetings.
We currently expect that directors of the CBOT subsidiary will not receive
any fees; although all directors of the CBOT subsidiary will receive
reimbursement of expenses for travel to meetings to the extent such meetings do
not coincide with meetings of the board of directors of CBOT Holdings.
David P. Brennan, the chairman of the board of directors in 1999 and 2000,
received director's fees of $240,000 during 2000. Mr. Neubauer was elected by
the members to serve as chairman of the board of directors in December 2000 and
began to serve in such capacity in January 2001. It is currently expected that
Mr. Neubauer will be paid a total of $240,000 in director's fees for 2001.
116
Executive Compensation
The following table and the related notes set forth information relating to
the compensation paid to, accrued or earned by each of our named executive
officers, consisting of our chief executive officers, each of the next four
most highly compensated of our current executive officers and two former
executive officers who, if currently serving, would be among the four most
highly compensated executive officers, for services rendered during the year
ended December 31, 2000.
Annual Compensation
-------------------------------------------
Name and Principal Other Annual
Position (1) Salary Bonus Compensation(2)(4) Total
------------------ -------- ------ ------------------ --------
Dennis A. Dutterer(3)......... $578,558 $ -- $ -- $578,558
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Carol A. Burke................ 419,375 -- 98,194 517,569
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
Phillip F. Hannigan........... 264,370 -- 73,302 337,672
Senior Vice President, Real
Estate Operations
Glen M. Johnson............... 261,875 3,000 69,298 334,173
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
David P. Prosperi............. 255,650 3,000 50,550 309,200
Senior Vice President and
Assistant to CEO
--------
(1) James P. Amaral served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information
Officer through March 2001. Patrick J. Catania served as Executive Vice
President, Business Development through July 2001. If Messrs. Amaral and
Catania were currently serving as executive officers, they would be among
the four most highly compensated executive officers. Mr. Amaral received
$400,000 in Salary, a $25,000 Bonus and $8,692 in Other Annual Compensation
for a total annual compensation of $433,692 during 2000. Mr. Catania
received $419,375 in Salary, a $20,000 Bonus and $124,544 in Other Annual
Compensation for a total annual compensation of $563,919 during 2000.
(2) Executives under contract are entitled to participate in all employee
benefit plans and to receive all other fringe benefits as are from time to
time made available to the senior management of the CBOT, which includes
the CBOT contribution to a qualified 401(k) savings plan and the CBOT
contribution to a non-qualified plan.
(3) Thomas R. Donovan was President and Chief Executive Officer through April
2000. Mr. Donovan received $479,200 in Salary and $596,421 in Other Annual
Compensation during 2000. Upon his departure, Mr. Donovan was paid $958,400
in partial settlement of his contract and $818,326 for accrued vacation and
sick days. Dennis A. Dutterer, who was appointed Interim President and
Chief Executive Officer in April 2000, resigned in December 2000, effective
as of January 15, 2001. Pursuant to a letter agreement between the CBOT and
the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation, Mr. Dutterer's salary was paid by
the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation but CBOT was obligated to reimburse
the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation for such amounts, including any
applicable employment taxes. See "--Employee-Related Agreements."
(4) The following table shows the amount of each category of "Other Annual
Compensation" paid with respect to each of the named individuals:
401(k)
Matching Supplemental
Name Contribution Plan Other Total
---- ------------ ------------ ------ -------
Mr. Dutterer........................ -- -- -- --
Ms. Burke........................... $32,528 $59,983 $5,683 $98,194
Mr. Hannigan........................ 3,336 64,990 4,976 73,302
Mr. Johnson......................... 12,701 46,566 10,031 69,298
Mr. Prosperi........................ 3,546 34,077 12,927 50,550
117
Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Plan
We are currently reviewing, and expect to adopt a stock plan under which
stock-based awards may be made to employees and directors of CBOT Holdings and
its subsidiaries, including the CBOT subsidiary and eCBOT. In order to
incentivize management, it is currently expected that CBOT Holdings will have a
long-term equity incentive plan which will enable CBOT Holdings to grant to
such individuals stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
performance awards and other similar awards. The purpose of the plan will be to
enable CBOT Holdings to attract and retain highly qualified employees, officers
and directors. We currently expect that the number of shares to be authorized
for issuance under such plan will be consistent with plans adopted by
comparable public companies.
401(k) and Thrift Plan
CBOT Holdings and its subsidiaries will maintain the 401(k)-type plan
currently sponsored by us and currently known as the "Employee Savings Plan."
This is a defined contribution retirement plan intended to qualify under
Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees of CBOT Holdings and its
subsidiaries will be eligible to participate in this plan after completing
1,000 hours of work on the first day of the month following one year of
employment.
The following table describes the elective employee and matching employer
contributions as defined under this plan, and the vesting of employer
contributions:
Employee Contributions* Employer Contributions
----------------------- ----------------------
Basic Pre-Tax 1-4%.......... 100% Match up to 4%
Voluntary Pre-Tax 5-10%..... None
Voluntary After-Tax 1-10%... None
Vesting..................... 20% after working 1,000 hours in the first
year of employment and 20% for each
calendar year after working 1,000 hours
thereafter. Participants become fully
vested after completing five years of
vesting service.
--------
* Subject to limits (Employee Contributions restricted to a combined limit of
17%) and other statutory annual limits.
Pension Plan
CBOT Holdings and its subsidiaries will also maintain a non-contributory
defined benefit pension plan that provides a predetermined amount of retirement
income to eligible participants and their beneficiaries. To participate in this
plan, an employee must complete one year of employment and be 21 years of age.
The policy will be to fund currently required pension costs to the extent
allowed for a tax deduction by the IRS. Participants become fully vested in the
plan after five years of vesting service, i.e., one year of vesting service is
obtained by completing 1,000 hours of work in a calendar year after age 18.
Health Plan
CBOT Holdings and its subsidiaries will maintain the health plan currently
sponsored by us which provides multiple medical and dental coverage options
covering qualified participants and their eligible dependents. New employees
are eligible to participate in the plan if working on a full-time basis after
30 days of consecutive active service. Plan funding is accomplished through a
combination of fully insured and self-funded arrangements. Employees contribute
specified amounts to the plan, depending on the medical or dental option
elected and the number of dependents covered. The administration of claims is
performed by insurance carriers and paid claims administrators.
118
Insurance Benefit Plan
CBOT Holdings and its subsidiaries will maintain our non-contributory
welfare plan providing life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment
benefits to eligible participants. New employees are eligible to participate in
the plan if working on a full-time basis after 31 days of consecutive active
service. The plan pays certain insurance carriers premiums through which
designated benefits are paid.
Non-Qualified Plans
CBOT Holdings and its subsidiaries will maintain our non-qualified plans
that are not subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
Employees whose compensation limits their benefits under Section 415 of the
Internal Revenue Code are compensated at year end for any benefit shortfall
based on current actuarial assumptions that mirror the defined benefit or
defined contribution plans.
CBOT Holdings and its subsidiaries also will maintain a nonqualified
supplemental pension plan for certain former employees. The liability for this
nonqualified plan is funded by life insurance on the lives of the participating
employees. CBOT Holdings and its subsidiaries will succeed to the trust
established by us for the purpose of administering the nonqualified plan.
Employment-Related Agreements
Donovan Agreement
We entered into an agreement with Thomas R. Donovan dated as of April 14,
2000, relating to the termination of Mr. Donovan's position as our President
and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement terminated Mr. Donovan's employment
agreement dated May 18, 1999, and provided that Mr. Donovan would render
limited consulting services to us and would receive reimbursement of out-of-
pocket expenses related to those services. The agreement also sets forth non-
competition terms and severance benefits. Pursuant to the Agreement, Mr.
Donovan is entitled to:
. a lump sum payment of about $1.4 million, paid on May 1, 2000, and
additional payments of equal amount, payable on January 1 of each year
from 2001 through 2003;
. a lump sum payment for 120 unused sick days, equal to about $479,200,
paid on May 1, 2000;
. provision of certain medical and insurance benefits through December 31,
2003, or until Mr. Donovan's earlier death;
. annual payments through December 31, 2003 to equal the amount we would
have paid to our pension plan, as determined by an actuary, on Mr.
Donovan's behalf during such time pursuant to the plan contribution
formula; and
. provision of medical and dental coverage after the term of the agreement
as contemplated in Mr. Donovan's prior employment contract.
Dutterer Agreement
On April 18, 2000, Mr. Dutterer entered into a letter agreement with the
CBOT and the CBOT entered into a letter agreement with the Board of Trade
Clearing Corporation, which agreements provided for Mr. Dutterer's employment
as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the CBOT and his retention
of his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Board of Trade
Clearing Corporation under the terms of his existing employment agreement with
the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation, as amended. Pursuant to the
agreements, Mr. Dutterer was entitled to receive a base salary of $825,000 per
year for his services to the CBOT and any discretionary bonus determined by our
board of directors. His employment with the CBOT was "at will" and the CBOT is
not responsible for any severance obligations. Under the agreements, the CBOT
agreed to reimburse the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation for its payment of:
. Mr. Dutterer's base salary;
. applicable employment taxes; and
119
. the amount of any discretionary bonus awarded to Mr. Dutterer by the CBOT
board of directors, with such reimbursement for employment taxes and
bonus being grossed-up for any additional taxes resulting from the
reimbursement.
All other expenses relating to the employment of Mr. Dutterer are the
responsibility of the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation.
Pursuant to his agreement with the CBOT, Mr. Dutterer agreed to abstain from
taking part in discussions and decisions that involve a potential conflict of
interest between the CBOT and the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation. The
agreement also contained certain confidentiality provisions and the CBOT's
agreement to indemnify Mr. Dutterer and to provide liability insurance to the
extent provided to the CBOT's other officers. Effective in January 2001, Mr.
Dutterer resigned from his position as Interim President and Chief Executive
Officer of the CBOT and returned to his position as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation on a full-time
basis.
Vitale Agreement
On February 20, 2001, we entered into an employment agreement with David J.
Vitale, our President and Chief Executive Officer, which has a term of four
years unless terminated earlier by the CBOT or the Executive or as a result of
Mr. Vitale's death or permanent disability. Under the agreement, Mr. Vitale is
entitled to a base salary of $1,250,000 per year in addition to a performance
bonus, which for fiscal year 2001 may not be less than $750,000. He is entitled
to participate in all of our employee benefit plans that are generally
available to senior management. In addition, in the event that Mr. Vitale's
term of employment terminates prior to achieving vested status under such
employee benefit plans, he will be entitled to an additional benefit under a
non-qualified deferred compensation plan in an amount equal to the amount of
non-vested benefits accrued under such employee benefit plans. He is also
entitled to have certain perquisites paid for or reimbursed by the CBOT,
including club memberships, automobile allowance and financial planning and
other professional expenses not to exceed $25,000.
In addition, Mr. Vitale received an incentive award, consisting of equity
appreciation rights, which will entitle him to receive the benefit of any
appreciation in the value of the CBOT's memberships and/or their post-
restructuring equivalents. The equity appreciation rights, which have been
granted in the form of appreciation units, give Mr. Vitale the right to receive
the excess of the fair market value of the covered equity with respect to an
appreciation unit on the date such appreciation unit is exercised over the
grant value of such appreciation unit.
The following table summarizes the type, number, grant value and covered
equity with respect to each appreciation unit granted to Mr. Vitale, as
modified to reflect the holding company structure adopted by the board of
directors in October 2001 and set forth in a letter agreement, which we expect
to enter into with Mr. Vitale prior to the completion of the restructuring
transactions.
EQUITY APPRECIATION RIGHTS COVERED EQUITY
---------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Class B Class C
Number of Grant Membership Membership
Class of Appreciation Value Membership Equivalent Common Stock Equivalent Equivalent
Appreciation Unit Units Per Unit Per Unit Equivalent Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit
------------------------ ------------ -------- ---------------------- --------------------- ------------ ----------
A-1A.................... 25 $400,000 1 Full Membership A-1 Conversion Shares 1 Series B-1 1 Class C
A-1B.................... 10 $600,000 1 Full Membership A-1 Conversion Shares 1 Series B-1 1 Class C
A-2..................... 10 $80,000 1 Associate Membership A-2 Conversion Shares 1 Series B-2 --
A-4..................... 5 $10,000 1 IDEM Membership A-4 Conversion Shares 1 Series B-4 --
A-5..................... 5 $20,000 1 COM Membership A-5 Conversion Shares 1 Series B-5 --
120
The number of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings covered by an
appreciation right will be dependent upon the number of shares of common stock
issued with respect to the membership equivalent for such appreciation unit
following completion of the restructuring transactions. The appreciation rights
will generally vest in accordance with the schedule set forth in the following
table:
Number of Applicable Appreciation Units Vested
Class of Appreciation -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unit February 20, 2002 February 20, 2003 February 20, 2004 February 20, 2005
--------------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------
A-1A.................... 10 Units 5 Units 5 Units 5 Units
A-1B.................... 4 Units 2 Units 2 Units 2 Units
A-2..................... 4 Units 2 Units 2 Units 2 Units
A-4..................... 2 Units 1 Unit 1 Unit 1 Unit
A-5..................... 2 Units 1 Unit 1 Unit 1 Unit
In the event that Mr. Vitale's term of employment is terminated because of
death, he would be entitled to receive his base salary through the end of the
sixth calendar month following the calendar month during which his employment
is terminated and any portion of the incentive award that is not vested would
immediately vest. In the event that Mr. Vitale's term of employment is
terminated because of permanent disability, he would be entitled to receive his
base salary through the earlier of the expiration of his employment agreement
and the first year of such permanent disability, and would be entitled to
receive one-half his base salary during the remaining term of the employment
agreement, if any. In addition, upon permanent disability, any portion of the
incentive award that is not vested would immediately vest. If Mr. Vitale is
terminated by the CBOT for cause, terminates employment without good reason or
the employment agreement reaches the end of its term, he would be entitled to
his base salary through his last day of employment and any portion of the
incentive award that has not been exercised would be forfeited. In the event
that the CBOT terminates Mr. Vitale without cause or Mr. Vitale terminates with
good reason, Mr. Vitale would be entitled to his base salary through the
expiration of his employment agreement and any portion of the incentive award
that is not vested would immediately vest; provided that any unexercised
incentive awards shall be forfeited four years following the date of
termination. In addition, Mr. Vitale would be entitled to payment of his
performance bonus of $750,000 in the event that the date of termination without
cause or for good reason occurs prior to payment of performance bonuses for
fiscal year 2001.
In the event that the restructuring transactions are not completed within 12
months of the date of the employment agreement, which term may be extended by
Mr. Vitale for six months, thereafter, Mr. Vitale may terminate the employment
agreement in the thirty day period immediately following the end of such term.
Under such circumstances, he would be entitled to receive his base salary
through the earlier of the expiration of his employment agreement and the end
of the second full fiscal year following the fiscal year of his election to
terminate employment and any portion of the incentive award that is not
exercised would be forfeited. In the event of a change of control, Mr. Vitale
or the CBOT may terminate Mr. Vitale's employment, and Mr. Vitale would be
entitled to receive his base salary through the earlier of the expiration of
his employment agreement and the end of the second full fiscal year following
the fiscal year such change of control occurs and all outstanding incentive
awards would become vested immediately prior to the transaction giving rise to
the change of control.
Mr. Vitale is also subject to certain non-competition and non-solicitation
provisions during the employment term and, in the event his employment
agreement is terminated prior to expiration, for one year following the date of
termination.
Other Agreements
We also have an Executive Employment Agreement with Carol A. Burke, our
Executive Vice President and General Counsel. The term of the agreement began
May 18, 1999 and runs until May 18, 2002 or the earlier death, total and
permanent disability or termination of the executive. The employment period
under the agreement will be extended for one calendar month for each calendar
month after May 2001 that Ms. Burke serves under her agreement. The CBOT and
Ms. Burke each have the right to provide notice to the other party
121
to their respective agreements of their intent to cease extending such
agreement and, upon such notice, the term of such agreement shall terminate 12
calendar months following the furnishing of notice of such intent. The
agreement provides for a base salary of $500,000 and annual increases as
determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion. The agreement
provides that the executive is entitled to participate in all of our employee
benefit plans that are generally available to senior management, including
post-employment medical and dental benefits.
In the event of Ms. Burke's disability, she would receive her base
compensation for the first year during which she is under the disability. After
the first year, she would receive one-half of her base pay during the remainder
of the disability, but not beyond the end of the employment term. This
disability pay would be reduced to the extent she receives payments from other
sources such as insurance as a result of the disability. We may terminate her
if the disability is total and permanent, in which case she would be entitled
to her base compensation through the end of the employment term. Pursuant to
the agreement, Ms. Burke agrees to certain non-competition provisions during
the employment term and for one year thereafter.
We have entered into a letter agreement with James P. Amaral, our former
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, pursuant to which we
agreed to pay Mr. Amaral severance in the amount of $215,384.01 in semi-monthly
payments in exchange for a release from claims related to his employment with
the CBOT. In addition, we have entered into an agreement with Patrick J.
Catania, pursuant to which, among other things, Mr. Catania agreed to resign
his position with the CBOT as Executive Vice President, Market and Product
Development, and the CBOT agreed to retain him as an employee at his current
salary until June 6, 2003 and thereafter until terminated by Mr. Catania or the
CBOT. As an employee, the agreement provides that Mr. Catania will perform
services for the CBOT relating to matters within the purview of his current
assignment on an as-needed basis.
122
Beneficial Ownership of Management and Directors
The following table lists the shares of capital stock of CBOT Holdings that
will be beneficially owned following completion of the restructuring
transactions by each of the directors, each of the executive officers named in
the summary compensation table included under "--Executive Compensation" and
CBOT Holdings' directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise
indicated below, this information is based on the beneficial ownership by those
persons of CBOT memberships as of September 11, 2001. There was no person known
to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the membership
interests of CBOT as of such date and none of the persons listed in the table
below are currently expected to beneficially own one percent or more of any of
the shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings.
Number of
Shares of
Name of Beneficial Common
Owner Stock
------------------ ---------
Dennis A. Dutterer(1)................................................. --
Thomas R. Donovan(1).................................................. --
Nickolas J. Neubauer.................................................. 50,000
David J. Vitale....................................................... --
Carol A. Burke........................................................ --
Patrick J. Catania(2)................................................. --
James P. Amaral(2).................................................... --
Bernard W. Dan........................................................ --
William M. Farrow III................................................. --
Philip P. Hannigan.................................................... --
Glen M. Johnson....................................................... --
Mary McDonnell........................................................ --
Charles P. Carey...................................................... 25,000
Raymond Cahnman(3).................................................... 127,900
James E. Cashman...................................................... 25,000
Mark E. Cermak........................................................ 25,000
Robert F. Corvino..................................................... 25,000
James F. Curley....................................................... 25,000
Andrew J. Filipowski.................................................. --
Douglas M. Kurzydlo................................................... 25,000
Veda Kaufman Levin.................................................... 25,000
James P. McMillin..................................................... 5,000
Joseph Niciforo....................................................... 30,000
James R. Thompson..................................................... --
J. Andrew Wallace(4).................................................. 80,000
Michael D. Walter(5).................................................. 25,000
Ralph H. Weems........................................................ --
Directors and Executive Officers as a group
(27 persons)......................................................... 492,900
--------
(1) As of December 6, 2000.
(2) As of March 16, 2001.
(3) Includes 10,700 shares of common stock owned by TransMarket Group LLC,
which Mr. Cahnman may be deemed to beneficially own. Mr. Cahnman disclaims
such beneficial ownership.
(4) Includes 75,000 shares of common stock owned by R. J. O'Brien & Associates,
which Mr. Wallace may be deemed to beneficially own. Mr. Wallace disclaims
such beneficial ownership.
(5) Includes 25,000 shares of common stock owned by ConAgra Specialty Grain
Cos., which Mr. Walter may be deemed to beneficially own. Mr. Walter
disclaims such beneficial ownership.
Our directors and officers hold memberships entitling them to cast an
aggregate of 18 1/2 votes on the proposal, representing about 1.2% of the total
votes that may be cast.
Until January 1, 2001, our board of directors was composed of twenty-seven
members, at which time the terms of nine directorships expired and ceased to
exist pursuant to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Some of these
directors may have held Full, Associate, GIM, IDEM or COM Memberships.
123
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
We describe generally below the material terms of the capital stock of CBOT
Holdings. However, this description is not complete. For a complete description
of the terms of our capital stock, we refer you to the forms of amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings, which are
attached as Appendices F and G, respectively, to this document. We urge you to
read those documents carefully before voting on the restructuring transactions.
For more information about our capital stock and how your rights and
obligations as stockholders will differ from your current rights and
obligations as members, see "Comparison of the Rights of Members of the CBOT
Prior to and After Completion of the Restructuring Transactions."
General
Under its certificate of incorporation, the authorized capital stock of CBOT
Holdings will consist of:
. 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share; and
. 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.
Immediately following the completion of the restructuring transactions,
39,802,650 shares of common stock will be outstanding. The shares of common
stock of CBOT Holdings issued in connection with the restructuring transactions
will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Description of Common Stock
Overview
The common stock will represent an equity interest in CBOT Holdings and will
generally have traditional features of common stock, including dividend, voting
and liquidation rights.
Dividend Rights
Subject to the limitations under Delaware law and priorities and preferences
that may apply to any outstanding shares of preferred stock, holders of common
stock will be entitled to receive such dividends or other distributions as may
be declared by the board of directors of CBOT Holdings out of funds legally
available therefor.
It is not currently anticipated that CBOT Holdings will pay cash dividends
on its common stock in the near future; however, CBOT Holdings may later
determine to pay cash dividends out of its available surplus.
Voting
Unless otherwise required by the certificate of incorporation of CBOT
Holdings, the terms of any preferred stock or applicable law, holders of the
common stock of CBOT Holdings will be entitled to one vote per share with
respect to all matters upon which the stockholders of CBOT Holdings are
entitled to vote generally, including the election of directors, amendments to
the certificate of incorporation (other than certain amendments relating solely
to the terms of any outstanding preferred stock), mergers, sales of all or
substantially all of the corporate assets or property or a dissolution. Except
as may be provided with respect to any preferred stock in a certificate of
designation filed pursuant to Delaware law, or as may otherwise be required by
Delaware law or the certificate of incorporation of CBOT Holdings, the common
stock will be the only capital stock of CBOT Holdings entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors and on all other matters presented to
the stockholders of CBOT Holdings. The common stock will not have cumulative
voting rights.
124
Board of Directors. On October 16, 2001, our board of directors approved and
adopted amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which, if
approved by our members, would authorize our board of directors to delay the
next annual election, which is currently scheduled for December 2001, until no
later than March 31, 2002, reduce the size of our board of directors from 18
members to nine members at the first annual election following timely approval
of the restructuring transactions by our members, clarify our board of
directors' discretion as to the timing of its regular meetings and make certain
other conforming changes. A special meeting of the members for the purpose of
voting on such amendments has been scheduled for October 31, 2001. If our
members approve such amendments and separately approve the restructuring
transactions in a timely manner, our board of directors will be reduced in size
from 18 directors to nine directors in connection with the next annual
election, which will be held as soon as reasonably practicable following
membership approval of the restructuring transactions, but in no event later
than March 31, 2002. At such annual election, our members will elect eight new
directors to serve on the nine-member board of directors with the then current
chairman of the board continuing to serve in such capacity as the ninth member
of such board. Upon completion of the restructuring transactions, the new
directors elected to serve on the nine-member board of directors will continue
to serve on the boards of directors of both CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary until the next annual meeting of each such corporation.
If the amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not
approved by our members or the membership vote on the restructuring
transactions does not occur in a timely manner, and, as a result, the size of
our board of directors is not reduced from 18 directors to nine directors prior
to the completion of the restructuring transactions, the certificate of
incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings will provide that the then current
18-member board of directors will continue as the boards of directors of CBOT
Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary immediately following completion of the
restructuring transactions. The size of the board of directors of CBOT Holdings
will thereafter be reduced to nine directors in connection with a special
meeting of stockholders, to be held as soon as reasonably practicable following
completion of the restructuring transactions. At such special meeting, the
stockholders will elect eight new directors to serve on the nine-member board
of directors with the then current chairman of the board continuing to serve in
such capacity as the ninth member of such board. In connection with the
election of directors to the new nine-member board of directors of CBOT
Holdings, it is anticipated that CBOT Holdings, as the sole Class A member of
the CBOT subsidiary, will elect each of the newly-elected directors serving on
the nine-member board of directors of CBOT Holdings as directors of the CBOT
subsidiary. Each director of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary will be
elected to serve as a director until the next annual meeting of each such
corporation and will not be subject to term limits.
In order to ensure that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings is generally
identical in size and composition to the board of directors of the CBOT
subsidiary, it will be a qualification for service as a director of the CBOT
subsidiary that such director also serve on the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings. The nine-member boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary will each consist of:
. the chairman of the board;
. five directors who are Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary;
. two directors who are "independent" within the meaning of the certificate
of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings; and
. one director who is "at-large," or generally not subject to
qualifications.
We currently expect that the president and chief executive officer of CBOT
Holdings will be nominated for election as the at-large director.
No Conversion, Preemptive or Subscription Rights
The holders of common stock of CBOT Holdings will have no conversion,
preemptive or subscription rights.
125
Liquidation Rights
Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of CBOT Holdings, whether
voluntary or involuntary, holders of common stock of CBOT Holdings will be
entitled to receive pro rata such assets as are available for distribution to
stockholders after there shall have been paid or set apart for payment the full
amounts necessary to satisfy any preferential or participating rights to which
holders of each outstanding series of preferred stock are entitled by the terms
of such series. In other words, each share of common stock shall have equal
liquidation rights.
Preferred Stock
CBOT Holdings will be authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of
preferred stock. The certificate of incorporation for CBOT Holdings will
authorize the board, without approval of the stockholders, to issue these
shares from time to time in one or more series, to establish the number of
shares to be included in each series, to fix the rights, preferences and
privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series and any of its
qualifications, limitations or restrictions. Such preferred stock is sometimes
referred to as "blank check" preferred stock.
Among the specific matters that may be determined by the board in connection
with the issuance of such preferred stock are the following:
. the designation of each series;
. the number of shares of each series;
. the rate of dividends, if any;
. whether dividends, if any, shall be cumulative or non-cumulative;
. the terms of redemption, if any;
. the amount payable in the event of any voluntary or involuntary
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of CBOT Holdings;
. rights and terms of conversion or exchange, if any;
. restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or any other
series, if any; and
. voting rights, if any.
Except as otherwise provided in the terms of any such series, the board of
directors may increase or decrease the number of shares of any series, but not
below the number of shares of that series then outstanding, without any further
vote or action by the stockholders of CBOT Holdings. The board may authorize
the issuance of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could
adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of shares of
the common stock of CBOT Holdings.
Although no shares of preferred stock will be outstanding upon completion of
the restructuring transactions and we have no current plans to issue preferred
stock, the issuance of shares of preferred stock, or the issuance of rights to
purchase such shares, could be used to discourage an unsolicited acquisition
proposal. For example, a business combination could be impeded by the issuance
of a series of preferred stock containing class voting rights that would enable
the holder or holders of such series to block any such transaction.
Alternatively, a business combination could be facilitated by the issuance of a
series of preferred stock having sufficient voting rights to provide a required
percentage vote of the stockholders. In addition, under certain circumstances,
the issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power and
other rights of the holders of common stock. Although the board of directors of
CBOT Holdings will be required to make any determination to issue any such
stock based on its judgment as to the best interests of CBOT Holdings and the
stockholders of CBOT Holdings, it could act in a manner that would discourage
an acquisition attempt or other transaction that some, or a majority, of the
stockholders might believe to be in their best interests or in which
stockholders might receive a premium for their stock over prevailing market or
other prices of such stock. We
126
do not currently intend to seek stockholder approval prior to the issuance of
currently authorized stock, unless otherwise required by law or other
applicable requirements.
One of the anticipated benefits of the restructuring transactions is the
positioning of CBOT Holdings to obtain better access to capital markets,
thereby giving CBOT Holdings the option, in the future, to issue shares of
preferred stock to one or more private investors in capital-raising
transactions. However, we cannot provide any assurances in this regard.
Transfer Restrictions
The shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings will generally be subject to a
complete restriction on transfer for the first 270 days following the date the
common stock is issued. Thereafter, 15%, 25%, 25% and 35% of the shares of
common stock of CBOT Holdings will be eligible for transfer on the date that is
270, 450, 630 and 810 days following the date the common stock is issued,
respectively. Notwithstanding these restrictions on transfer, stockholders may
transfer all, but not less than all, of the shares of common stock associated
with a Class B membership and, to the extent applicable, a Class C membership,
in the CBOT subsidiary if all such shares of common stock are transferred
together with the associated Class B membership and, to the extent applicable,
a Class C membership (i.e., 25,000 shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings with
one Series B-1, Class B membership and one Class C membership in the CBOT
subsidiary, 5,000 shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings with one Series B-2,
Class B membership in the CBOT subsidiary, 2,500 shares of common stock of CBOT
Holdings with one Series B-3, Class B membership in the CBOT subsidiary, 300
shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings with one Series B-4, Class B membership
in the CBOT subsidiary, and 350 shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings with
one Series B-5, Class B membership in the CBOT subsidiary). The certificate of
incorporation of CBOT Holdings will grant authority to the board of directors
to remove or reduce this restriction on transfer of the common stock if it
determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that such action is
appropriate.
Although Class B memberships in the CBOT subsidiary generally will not be
subject to any transfer restrictions, the exercise of the trading rights and
privileges associated with the Class B memberships will be subject to
substantially the same application and approval process that currently applies
to CBOT membership candidates. Under that process, any adult, other than an
employee of the CBOT subsidiary, of good character, reputation, financial
responsibility and credit will be eligible to become a Class B member of, and
exercise trading rights and privileges at, the CBOT subsidiary. Candidates will
be reviewed to determine whether they meet applicable requirements in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary.
The Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary generally will also not be
subject to any transfer restrictions. However, a holder of a Class C membership
seeking to become a member of the Chicago Board Options Exchange must hold
25,000 shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings and one Series B-1, Class B
membership in the CBOT subsidiary, along with such Class C membership, in each
case subject to certain adjustments, in order to be eligible to become a member
of the Chicago Board Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership
on such exchange.
In addition to the restrictions discussed above, shares of common stock of
CBOT Holdings received in connection with the restructuring transactions by
"affiliates" may be resold only pursuant to further registration under the
Securities Act or in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act.
Other Provisions
CBOT Holdings will establish a number of change of control provisions that
may have the effect of encouraging persons considering unsolicited tender
offers or other unilateral takeover proposals to negotiate with CBOT Holdings'
board of directors rather than pursue non-negotiated takeover attempts. Some of
these provisions will be implemented pursuant to the certificate of
incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings and others will be implemented
independently. These provisions will include the following:
127
Advance Notice Procedures. CBOT Holdings' bylaws will contain provisions
requiring that advance notice be delivered to CBOT Holdings of any business
to be brought by a stockholder before an annual meeting of stockholders and
providing for certain procedures to be followed by stockholders in
nominating persons for election to the CBOT Holdings board of directors.
Generally, such advance notice provisions will require that a
stockholder must give written notice to the secretary of CBOT Holdings not
less than 30, nor more than 75, days prior to the first anniversary of the
date on which CBOT Holdings first mailed its proxy materials for the
preceding year's annual meeting of stockholders. In each case, the notice
must set forth specific information regarding such stockholder and each
director nominee or other business proposed by such stockholder, as
applicable, as provided in the bylaws. Except as described below with
respect to nominations by stockholders of CBOT Holdings for persons to be
elected to the board of directors of CBOT Holdings at a special meeting of
stockholders at which directors are to be elected, stockholders will not be
permitted to make proposals, or bring other business, to a special meeting
of stockholders.
Nominations by stockholders for persons to be elected to the CBOT
Holdings board of directors at a special meeting of the stockholders, if
directors are to be elected at such meeting, generally will require that a
stockholder give written notice to the secretary of CBOT Holdings not later
than the later of the 90th day prior to such special meeting or the 10th
day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the
date of the special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the CBOT
Holdings board of directors.
Special Meetings of Stockholders. CBOT Holdings' certificate of
incorporation and bylaws will expressly provide that only the chairman of
the board, the president or the board of directors may call special
meetings of the stockholders, and will not permit stockholders to call
special meetings.
No Action by Written Consent of Stockholders. CBOT Holdings' certificate
of incorporation will require that all stockholder actions must be taken by
a vote of the stockholders at an annual or special meeting, and will not
permit the stockholders to take action by written consent without a
meeting.
Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation. CBOT Holdings' certificate of
incorporation will generally require the approval of not less than a
majority of the voting power of all then-outstanding shares of stock of
CBOT Holdings entitled to vote generally in the election of directors,
voting together as a single class, in order to amend the certificate of
incorporation.
Amendment of Bylaws. CBOT Holdings' certificate of incorporation will
generally require the approval of not less than two-thirds of the voting
power of all then-outstanding shares of stock of CBOT Holdings entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single
class, in order to adopt, repeal or amend the bylaws in response to a
stockholder proposal. This provision will make it more difficult to dilute
the change of control effects of the bylaws of CBOT Holdings. The
certificate of incorporation will permit the board to amend the bylaws
without any stockholder vote, except where a vote of a series of preferred
stock is required by the terms of such series.
Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute. CBOT Holdings will elect to be subject
to a Delaware anti-takeover law. Subject to certain exceptions, this
statute prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a
"business combination" with an "interested stockholder" for a period of
three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an
interested stockholder, unless:
. prior to such date, the board of directors of the corporation
approved either the business combination or the transaction which
resulted in the stockholder's becoming an interested stockholder;
. upon completion of the transaction which resulted in the
stockholder's becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced,
excluding, for purposes of determining the number of shares
outstanding, those shares owned by persons who are directors and
also officers
128
and by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have
the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to
the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
. on or after such date, the business combination is approved by the
board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of
at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned
by the interested stockholder.
For purposes of this statute, a "business combination" includes a
merger, asset sale or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to
the interested stockholder, and an "interested stockholder" is a person
who, together with affiliates and associates, owns 15% or more of the
corporation voting stock or a person who is an affiliate of the corporation
and who did own, or within three years prior to the date of determination
whether the person is an "interested stockholder did own," 15% or more of
the corporation's voting stock.
Stockholder Rights Plan. We currently anticipate that the board of
directors of CBOT Holdings would be asked to consider, and may adopt, a
stockholder rights plan in connection with any underwritten public offering
of its common stock. The basic objective of a rights plan is to provide for
an appropriate role for the board of directors in the event of a potential
change of control. A rights plan seeks to protect the corporation and its
stockholders from abusive takeover measures, to maximize stockholder value
if the corporation is sold and to encourage potential acquirors to
negotiate with the board of directors rather than make an unsolicited
takeover proposal. A rights plan aims to accomplish these goals by making
attempts to acquire control of the corporation without the board's approval
unacceptably expensive and dilutive to the bidder. This is implemented by
the issuance to each stockholder of one contingent stock purchase right,
which would be triggered by certain events generally involving the
acquisition by a third party of a significant amount of the corporation's
stock. You should understand that we do not have any current plan or
intention to conduct any such offering of common stock.
Limitation of Liability of Directors
The certificate of incorporation of CBOT Holdings will provide, as
authorized by Delaware law, that a director of CBOT Holdings will not be
personally liable to CBOT Holdings or its stockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability imposed by law, as
in effect from time to time:
. for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to CBOT Holdings or its
stockholders;
. for any act or omission not in good faith or which involved intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
. for unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or
redemptions as provided by Delaware law; or
. for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit.
The inclusion of this provision in our certificate of incorporation may have
the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against
directors, and may discourage or deter stockholders or management from bringing
a lawsuit against directors for breach of their duty of care, even though such
an action, if successful, might otherwise have benefitted CBOT Holdings and its
stockholders.
The bylaws of CBOT Holdings will provide that CBOT Holdings will indemnify
its directors and officers and may indemnify its employees and agents to the
fullest extent permitted by law. The bylaws will also permit CBOT Holdings to
secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent
for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity,
regardless of whether the bylaws would permit indemnification.
Transfer Agent
We are currently evaluating third parties to serve as transfer agent and
registrar for the common stock of CBOT Holdings in connection with the
completion of the restructuring transactions.
129
COMPARISON OF THE RIGHTS OF MEMBERS OF THE CBOT
PRIOR TO AND AFTER COMPLETION OF THE RESTRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS
Overview
As a result of the restructuring transactions, the CBOT will be demutualized
by creating a stock, for-profit holding company, CBOT Holdings, and
distributing shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings to our members, while
maintaining the CBOT as a nonstock subsidiary of CBOT Holdings. In addition, in
connection with the restructuring transactions, our board of directors has
adopted, and we are proposing, certain significant changes to our certificate
of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations. Generally speaking, these
changes are designed to implement a more modern and efficient corporate
governance structure.
You are being asked to approve these changes as part of the restructuring
transactions. We currently expect that these changes to our rules and
regulations will generally take effect at the time that the amended and
restated certificates of incorporation of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary
become effective. Upon taking effect, many of your rights and obligations as
stockholders of CBOT Holdings and as members of the CBOT subsidiary will change
from those that you currently have as members of the CBOT. In this section, we
will describe those changes that we believe to be material. We urge you to
carefully review and consider these changes in your rights and obligations
before voting on the restructuring transactions.
The following description summarizes the material differences between the
rights and obligations of holders of the CBOT memberships prior to and after
completion of the restructuring transactions. We do not intend this summary to
be a complete statement of the rights and obligations of holders of the common
stock of CBOT Holdings or memberships in the CBOT subsidiary, or a
comprehensive comparison of the rights and obligations of members of the CBOT
prior to and after completion of the restructuring transactions, or a complete
description of the specific provisions referred to in this summary. We do not
intend that this identification of specific differences is to indicate that
other equally or more significant differences do not exist.
The forms of certificate of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings are
attached as Appendices F and G to this document, respectively, and the forms of
certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the CBOT subsidiary are attached as
Appendices H and I to this document, respectively. Our current certificate of
incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations have been filed as exhibits to
the registration statement of which this document forms a part. In addition,
the form of the rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary, which, subject to
changes to the rules and regulations occurring from time to time after the date
of this document, we currently expect to be the rules and regulations of the
CBOT subsidiary immediately after completion of the restructuring transactions,
has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. A summary of the
status of certain current CBOT rules and regulations as a result of the
restructuring transactions is attached as Appendix J to this document. We urge
you to review and consider carefully each of these documents before voting on
the restructuring transactions.
For-Profit Status; Authority to Issue Capital Stock
Currently, our certificate of incorporation expressly provides that the CBOT
is not-for-profit and has no authority to issue capital stock. The certificate
of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary will provide that it remains without
authority to issue capital stock but that it is for-profit. CBOT Holdings, as
the holder of the sole Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary, will be
entitled to receive all profits, i.e., distributions, dividends and proceeds
upon liquidation, from the CBOT subsidiary. The certificate of incorporation
for CBOT Holdings will provide that it is for-profit and has the ability to
issue capital stock, which will enable us to issue the shares of common stock
in connection with the restructuring transactions.
As described below under "--Authorized Capital," CBOT Holdings will have the
ability to issue additional shares of capital stock in the future at the
discretion of the board of directors, without stockholder
130
approval. The issuance of additional shares of capital stock could cause your
equity interest in CBOT Holdings to be diluted and the market price or value of
your shares, if any, to decline.
Dividends
Delaware law currently provides that corporations, whether for-profit or
not-for-profit, may declare and pay dividends on the shares of its stock, or on
its memberships if the corporation is a nonstock corporation, out of funds
legally available for such purposes. Neither the CBOT's, CBOT Holdings' nor the
CBOT subsidiary's certificate of incorporation otherwise restricts the CBOT's,
CBOT Holdings' or the CBOT subsidiary's respective authority to declare and pay
dividends. Consequently, the CBOT, under the current certificate of
incorporation, CBOT Holdings under its certificate of incorporation and the
CBOT subsidiary, under its certificate of incorporation, are, for purposes of
Delaware law, authorized to declare and pay dividends.
CBOT Holdings will have the ability to declare and pay dividends to its
common stockholders, and the CBOT subsidiary will have the ability to declare
and pay dividends to its Class A member, CBOT Holdings, in each case, out of
funds legally available for such purposes. Stock corporations may pay dividends
out of their "surplus" as defined under Delaware law or, in certain
circumstances out of "net profits" for the fiscal year in which the dividend is
declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. However, the right to receive
dividends as common stockholders of CBOT Holdings will be subject to priorities
and preferences that may apply to any outstanding shares of preferred stock.
We have no current plans to pay cash dividends on the common stock of CBOT
Holdings in the near future; however, CBOT Holdings may later determine to pay
cash dividends out of its available surplus.
Authorized Capital
Currently, our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, rules and regulations
authorize five classes of membership:
. Full;
. Associate;
. GIM (and one-half Associate Membership);
. IDEM; and
. COM.
In order to authorize any additional classes of membership, it would be
necessary to amend our bylaws or rules, which are deemed part of the bylaws.
The authorized or maximum number of Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs
under the bylaws and rules is 866, 351, 642 and 643, respectively. Our
certificate of incorporation, bylaws, rules and regulations do not expressly
provide for an authorized or maximum number of Full Memberships. However, our
certificate of incorporation, bylaws, rules and regulations do not authorize
the creation of new members in existing classes. Therefore, we believe that the
creation of new members would require an amendment to our rules, which, in the
case of Full Members, has the result of creating a de facto authorized or
maximum number of Full Memberships equal to the current number of such
memberships, which is 1,402.
Under its amended and restated certificate of incorporation, CBOT Holdings
will be authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share and up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.001 per share. The common stock of CBOT Holdings will generally have
traditional features of common stock, including dividend, voting and
liquidation rights. Immediately after completion of the restructuring
transactions, there will be 39,802,650 shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings
issued and outstanding.
As a result, based on the foregoing, following completion of the
restructuring transactions, the board of CBOT Holdings would be authorized to
issue up to an additional 60,197,350 shares of its common stock
131
without requiring an amendment to the certificate of incorporation of CBOT
Holdings and without stockholder approval. The authorization of any additional
shares of common stock in excess of these amounts would require an amendment to
the certificate of incorporation of CBOT Holdings, which would, in turn,
require appropriate stockholder approval.
The creation of any additional classes of common stock of CBOT Holdings will
require an amendment to the certificate of incorporation of CBOT Holdings. The
board of CBOT Holdings, however, will be authorized, without stockholder
approval, to create and issue additional classes of preferred stock, having
such powers, designations and preferences as are set forth in a resolution
adopted by the board and set forth in a certificate of designations filed with
the State of Delaware.
Under the certificate of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary, it will be
authorized to issue up to:
. one Class A membership;
. 1,402 Series B-1, Class B memberships;
. 866 Series B-2, Class B memberships;
. 162 Series B-3, Class B memberships;
. 642 Series B-4, Class B memberships;
. 643 Series B-5, Class B memberships; and
. 1,402 Series Class C memberships.
Immediately after completion of the restructuring transactions, we currently
expect that the following memberships in the CBOT subsidiary will be
outstanding:
. one Class A membership;
. 1,402 Series B-1, Class B memberships;
. 786 Series B-2, Class B memberships;
. 162 Series B-3, Class B memberships;
. 642 Series B-4, Class B memberships;
. 643 Series B-5, Class B memberships; and
. 1,402 Class C memberships.
The Class A membership, which will be held by CBOT Holdings, will entitle
CBOT Holdings to the exclusive right to vote on most matters requiring a vote
of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, as well as the exclusive right to
receive all distributions, dividends and proceeds upon liquidation from the
CBOT subsidiary. Each of the five series of Class B membership will entitle an
eligible holder to trading rights and privileges that correspond to the trading
rights and privileges of one of the five currently authorized classes of CBOT
membership. The Class C membership in the CBOT subsidiary will, subject to
satisfaction of certain requirements, entitle the holder to become a member of
the Chicago Board Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership on
such exchange.
The creation of any additional classes or series of memberships or the
creation of any additional authorized memberships from the classes or series of
memberships in the CBOT subsidiary described above would require an amendment
to the certificate of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary, which would require
the approval of the CBOT subsidiary's board and Class A member. In addition,
any amendment which would adversely affect the authorized number of Class B
memberships would require a class vote of the Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class
B memberships.
Terms and Conditions of Membership
Currently, the terms and conditions of membership in the CBOT are set forth
in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, rules and regulations. The terms
and conditions of membership, including all trading
132
rights and privileges, will continue to be set forth in the CBOT subsidiary's
certificate of incorporation, bylaws, rules and regulations. The terms and
conditions of membership in the CBOT include, but are not limited to, general
provisions related to application for membership, member rights, privileges and
obligations, member conduct and discipline, registration, assessments and fees,
purchase and sale or transfers of memberships or membership interests,
insolvency and trading and other rights and privileges of the various classes
of membership.
The certificate of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary will provide that
the rights and obligations, including trading rights and privileges, of CBOT
members will be associated with one of the five series of Class B membership in
the CBOT subsidiary to be issued in connection with the restructuring
transactions. As described above, the Class B memberships will be issued in
five separate series: Series B-1, Series B-2, Series B-3, Series B-4 and Series
B-5. The certificate of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary will provide that
each holder of Series B-1, Series B-2, Series B-3, Series B-4 and Series B-5,
Class B memberships who satisfies the membership and eligibility requirements
with respect to a Full Membership, Associate Membership, GIM Membership, IDEM
Membership or COM Membership, respectively, in each case, as set forth in the
CBOT subsidiary's rules and regulations, will be entitled to all of the rights
and privileges, including all trading rights and privileges, of a CBOT Full
Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM or COM, as the case may be, subject to
applicable Delaware law or as otherwise provided in the CBOT subsidiary's
certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations.
In addition, the certificate of incorporation for the CBOT subsidiary will
provide that Class C memberships, which will, subject to satisfaction of
certain terms and conditions, entitle the holder to become a member of the
Chicago Board Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership on such
exchange, will be issued to each CBOT Full Member.
Transferability
Currently, memberships may be purchased or sold pursuant to transfer
mechanisms established by our rules and regulations.
The shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings will generally be subject to a
complete restriction on transfer for the first 270 days following the date the
common stock is issued. Thereafter, 15%, 25%, 25% and 35% of the shares of
common stock of CBOT Holdings will be eligible for transfer after the date that
is 270, 450, 630 and 810 days following the date the common stock is issued,
respectively. Notwithstanding these restrictions on transfer, stockholders may
transfer all, but not less than all, of the shares of common stock of CBOT
Holdings associated with a Class B membership and, to the extent applicable, a
Class C membership, in the CBOT subsidiary if all such shares of common stock
are transferred together with the associated Class B membership and, to the
extent applicable, a Class C membership. The certificate of incorporation of
CBOT Holdings will grant authority to the board of directors to remove or
reduce this restriction on transfer of the common stock if it determines, in
its sole and absolute discretion, that such action is appropriate.
Although Class B memberships in the CBOT subsidiary generally will not be
subject to any transfer restrictions, the exercise of the trading rights and
privileges associated with the Class B memberships will be subject to
substantially the same application and approval process that currently applies
to CBOT membership candidates. Under that process, any adult, other than an
employee of the CBOT subsidiary, of good character, reputation, financial
responsibility and credit will be eligible to become a Class B member of, and
exercise trading rights and privileges at the, CBOT subsidiary. Candidates will
be reviewed to determine whether they meet applicable requirements in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary.
The Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary generally will also not be
subject to any transfer restrictions. However, a holder of a Class C membership
seeking to become a member of the Chicago Board Options Exchange must hold
25,000 shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings and one Series B-1, Class B
133
membership in the CBOT subsidiary, along with such Class C membership, in each
case subject to certain adjustments, in order to be eligible to become a member
of the Chicago Board Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership
on such exchange.
Voting Rights
Under the CBOT's current certificate of incorporation and bylaws, Full
Members and Associate Members have the right to vote on all matters submitted
to a vote of the general membership. Each Full Member is entitled to one vote
per Full Membership and each Associate Member is entitled to one-sixth of one
vote per Associate Membership on all such matters. GIMs, IDEMs and COMs have no
right to vote under the current certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
The holders of common stock of CBOT Holdings will have the right to vote on
all matters upon which the stockholders of CBOT Holdings will be entitled to
vote generally, including among other things, the election of directors to the
board of directors of CBOT Holdings. As a result, to the extent that they hold
shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs will have the
right to vote on all matters upon which the stockholders of CBOT Holdings will
be entitled to vote generally. In addition, the allocation of shares of common
stock of CBOT Holdings among members in connection with the completion of the
restructuring transactions will result in a dilution of the Full Members'
voting rights relative to the voting rights of Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs
and COMs.
CBOT Holdings, as the holder of the sole Class A membership in the CBOT
subsidiary, will have the exclusive right to vote on most matters requiring a
vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, including among other things, the
election of directors to the board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary. As a
result, the holders of Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary
will not have voting rights with respect to matters requiring a vote of the
members of the CBOT subsidiary, except that holders of Series B-1 and Series B-
2, Class B memberships will have limited voting rights to approve certain
changes that would adversely affect certain core rights related to the trading
rights and privileges of Class B memberships.
Liquidation Rights
The CBOT's current rules and regulations provide that, in the event of a
full liquidation of the CBOT, the members would share in the proceeds from
dissolution in an approximate ratio of 6.00 : 1.00 : 0.67 : 0.03 : 0.03 for
each Full Membership, Associate Membership, GIM, IDEM and COM, respectively.
In the event of a full liquidation of CBOT Holdings, liquidating
distributions will be made to common stockholders pro rata based on the number
of shares of common stock they hold. In the event of the full liquidation of
the CBOT subsidiary, the Class A member, which will be CBOT Holdings, will be
entitled to all liquidating distributions. Class B and Class C members of the
CBOT subsidiary will not be entitled to any distributions upon the liquidation
of the CBOT subsidiary. As a result of the allocation of shares of common stock
of CBOT Holdings and the creation of a holding company structure in connection
with the restructuring transactions, Full Members and GIMs will experience a
decline in their liquidation rights relative to the liquidation rights of
Associate Members, IDEMs and COMs.
Proceeds of Membership
Under our current rules and regulations, upon any transfer of a membership,
whether made by a member voluntarily or by the board of directors, the proceeds
are applied pursuant to a priority set forth in the rules and regulations. The
types of claims that currently have priority in the proceeds of a transferred
membership include, among other things: dues, assessments, service fees, fines,
contributions, and other charges and indebtedness payable to the CBOT or a
clearing house, amounts owed to clearing members and amounts owed on loans that
financed the purchase of such membership.
Following completion of the restructuring transactions, we currently expect
that the claims of Class B and Class C members of the CBOT subsidiary will
continue to have an automatic priority over the claims of non-
134
members against the proceeds of the sale of Class B and Class C memberships.
The rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary will provide that the proceeds
of any transfer of Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary will
be subject to the priority of payments provision that is currently applicable
to the transfer of CBOT memberships.
Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation
Under our current certificate of incorporation, amendments to the
certificate of incorporation must be adopted by the board of directors in
accordance with Delaware law and then submitted to a vote of the membership.
Proposals to amend the certificate of incorporation will be adopted if at least
300 votes have been cast at a special meeting of the membership and a majority
of the votes cast were in favor of the proposal.
Under the certificate of incorporation of CBOT Holdings, amendments must
also be adopted by the board of directors and then submitted to a vote of the
stockholders. However, proposals to amend the certificate of incorporation will
be adopted only if at least a majority of the voting power of all of the then-
outstanding shares of stock of CBOT Holdings entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors, voting together as a single class, are voted in favor of
the proposal. As a result, it will be more difficult to amend the certificate
of incorporation of CBOT Holdings.
In addition, the certificate of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary will
provide that amendments must also be approved by the board of directors of the
CBOT subsidiary and submitted to a vote of the membership. However, Class B and
Class C members will not have the right to vote on matters that require
approval by the members of the CBOT subsidiary, except that Class B members
will have the limited right to vote on amendments that would adversely affect
certain core rights relating to the trading rights and privileges associated
with Class B memberships.
Amendment of Bylaws and Rules and Regulations; Substantial Elimination of the
Petition Process
Currently, our certificate of incorporation provides that the bylaws, which
include the rules, may only be adopted, amended or repealed with the approval
of the membership. Proposed amendments to the bylaws may be independently
recommended by the board of directors for submission to a vote at a special
meeting of the membership. In addition, 25 or more voting members have the
right to petition for the board of directors' approval to call a special
meeting of the membership for the purpose of voting on amendments to the
bylaws. If the board of directors does not approve the initial petition, 100 or
more voting members have the right to petition for such special meeting and
such special meeting will then be called by the board of directors or the
chairman of the board in accordance with the procedures set forth in the
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, See "--Special Meetings." Proposals to
amend the bylaws, including the rules, will be adopted if at least 300 votes
have been cast at a special meeting and a majority of the votes cast were in
favor of the proposal. This process, together with certain other provisions of
the bylaws, rules and regulations, including those relating to the nomination
procedures for elective officers and the annual election, constituted what is
sometimes referred to as the "petition process" of the CBOT membership. This
petition process effectively vests in the voting membership the authority to
adopt, amend and repeal bylaws, including the rules, which, together with our
certificate of incorporation and the regulations, generally govern the rights
and obligations of the members of the CBOT.
In connection with the restructuring transactions, the petition process is
being substantially eliminated, with the principal exception consisting of the
right to vote on adverse changes to certain core rights associated with the
Class B memberships of the CBOT subsidiary. As a result, the ability of the
holders of common stock of CBOT Holdings and the Class B and Class C members of
the CBOT subsidiary to participate in the day-to-day management and operations
of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary, respectively, will be significantly
reduced. In sharp contrast to the substantial rights of current CBOT members
pursuant to the petition process, stockholders of CBOT Holdings will have
rights more consistent with those of stockholders of a publicly held
corporation and members of the CBOT subsidiary will have substantially reduced
rights relative to the members of the CBOT.
135
Specifically, the holders of the common stock of CBOT Holdings will not be
entitled to initiate proposals to amend the certificate of incorporation of
CBOT Holdings or, as described below, the certificate of incorporation, bylaws
and rules and regulations of the CBOT subsidiary. Any proposal to adopt, repeal
or amend the bylaws of CBOT Holdings may only be brought at to a vote at an
annual meeting after satisfying certain advance notice requirements described
below and will require the approval of two-thirds of the voting power of the
stockholders of CBOT Holdings entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors. The certificate of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings will
provide that stockholders may not call special meetings of stockholders and
only the chairman, the president and the board of directors will have the right
to call such special meetings. The bylaws of CBOT Holdings will contain
provisions requiring that advance notice be delivered to CBOT Holdings of any
business to be brought by a stockholder before an annual meeting of
stockholders and providing for certain procedures to be followed by
stockholders in nominating persons for election to CBOT Holdings' board of
directors. Generally, such advance notice provisions will require that for an
annual meeting a stockholder must give written notice to the secretary of CBOT
Holdings not less than 30, nor more than 75, days prior to the first
anniversary of the date on which CBOT Holdings first mailed its proxy materials
for the preceding year's annual meeting of stockholders. In each case, the
notice must set forth specific information regarding such stockholder and each
director nominee or other business proposed by such stockholder, as applicable,
as provided in CBOT Holdings' bylaws. Except with respect to nominations by
stockholders for persons to be elected to the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings at a special meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be
elected, stockholders of CBOT Holdings will not be permitted to make proposals,
or bring other business, to a special meeting of stockholders.
As described above, CBOT Holdings, as the holder of the sole Class A
membership in the CBOT subsidiary, will have the exclusive right to vote on
most matters requiring a vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, including
among other things, the election of directors to the board of directors of the
CBOT subsidiary. The holders of Class B and Class C memberships in the CBOT
subsidiary will not have voting rights with respect to matters requiring a vote
of the members of the CBOT subsidiary, except that holders of Series B-1 and
Series B-2, Class B memberships will have limited voting rights to approve
certain changes that would adversely affect certain core rights related to the
trading rights and privileges of Class B memberships. Accordingly, the
certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the CBOT subsidiary do not provide
Class B and Class C members the right to bring proposals before annual or
special meetings of the membership of the CBOT subsidiary nor will Class B and
Class C members have the right to call special meetings of the membership of
the CBOT subsidiary.
Under our current certificate of incorporation and bylaws, the rules are
deemed to be part of the bylaws and are therefore subject to the petition
process described above. Under the CBOT subsidiary's certificate of
incorporation and bylaws, the rules and regulations will be incorporated into
the bylaws and the board of directors of the CBOT subsidiary and CBOT Holdings,
as the holder of the sole Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary, will have
authority to adopt, amend or repeal rules and regulations, provided that such
amendments do not adversely affect a core right, in which case such amendment
would be required to be submitted to a vote of the holders of Series B-1 and
Series B-2, Class B memberships.
In connection with the restructuring transactions, the petition process is
being substantially eliminated. The principal exception is that holders of
Series B-1 and Series B-2, Class B memberships will have the right to vote on
adverse changes to certain core rights associated with the trading rights and
privileges of Class B members. This is an important aspect of the restructuring
transactions, which will materially change your rights. Following completion of
the restructuring transactions, your ability as a common stockholder of CBOT
Holdings and as a member of the CBOT subsidiary to participate in the day-to-
day management and operations of either CBOT Holdings or the CBOT subsidiary
will be significantly reduced as a result of the substantial elimination of the
petition process.
136
Election of Directors
Currently, our certificate of incorporation provides that the nominating
committee will nominate candidates to stand for election to the board of
directors. In addition, members have the right to petition, which petition must
be signed by at least 40 members, to nominate other candidates to stand for
election to the board of directors.
Under the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings,
nominations for directors will be made by the nominating committee of the board
of directors of CBOT Holdings and may be made by stockholders satisfying the
advance notice requirements described above under "Description of Capital
Stock--Other Provisions--Advance Notice Procedures" and elections for directors
will be conducted by proxy solicitation in connection with an annual meeting of
the stockholders or a special meeting of stockholders called for such purpose.
As a result of the advance notice requirements under CBOT Holdings' bylaws,
stockholder influence on the nomination process in connection with the election
of directors will be substantially diminished. In addition, any proxy
solicitation must be conducted in accordance with the federal securities laws,
as applicable.
The certificate of incorporation of the CBOT subsidiary will provide that
the holder of the Class A membership, which will be CBOT Holdings, will be
entitled to elect directors to serve on the board of directors of the CBOT
subsidiary. However, it will be a qualification that each director of the CBOT
subsidiary serve on the board of directors of CBOT Holdings, which will
generally result in CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary having boards of
directors that are identical in size and composition.
Since this represents a material change to your rights, we urge you to give
careful consideration to this aspect of the restructuring transactions before
voting on the restructuring transactions.
Special Meetings
Currently, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provides that 25 or
more voting members have the right to petition for the board of directors'
approval to call a special meeting of the membership for the purpose of voting
on amendments to the bylaws. If the board of directors does not approve the
initial petition, 100 or more voting members have the right to petition for
such special meeting and such special meeting will then be called by the board
of directors or the chairman of the board in accordance with the procedures set
forth in the certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Independently, the board
of directors or the chairman of the board may call for a special meeting of the
membership for any purpose to be held at such place, on such date, and at such
time as they or he or she fix.
Under the bylaws of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary, special meetings
of the stockholders may only be called by the chairman of the board, the
president or by the board of directors acting pursuant to a resolution of a
majority of the board of directors. As a result, stockholders of CBOT Holdings
and members of the CBOT subsidiary will not have authority to cause the board
of directors or chairman of the board to call a special meeting for any
purpose, including proposals to amend the bylaws. However, CBOT Holdings, as
the holder of the sole Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary, could take
action by written consent without a meeting to take such actions as amend the
bylaws of the CBOT subsidiary, subject to the right of holders of Series B-1
and Series B-2, Class B memberships to consent to certain changes that would
adversely affect certain core rights related to the trading rights and
privileges of Class B memberships. Since this represents a material change to
your rights, we urge you to give careful consideration to this aspect of the
restructuring transactions before voting on the restructuring transactions.
Annual Meetings
Under our current bylaws, the annual meeting of the members is required to
be held on the first Thursday after the third Tuesday in February at 2:30 p.m.
As a matter of practice, member matters are generally not submitted to a vote
at such meeting.
137
Under the bylaws of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary, and to the
fullest extent required by applicable law, an annual meeting will be required
to be held for the purpose of electing directors and transacting such other
business as may be properly called come before the meeting at such place, on
such date, and at such time as the board of directors shall each year fix,
provided that the date of the annual meeting shall be within 13 months of the
last annual meeting of stockholders as required by applicable law.
Repeal of Certain Rules and Regulations
In order to implement certain changes to the corporate governance structure
of the CBOT subsidiary in connection with the restructuring transactions,
certain rules and regulations will be repealed or eliminated in their entirety.
A summary of those rules and regulations that will be repealed or eliminated in
their entirety in connection with the restructuring transactions is set forth
in Appendix J to this document, which is entitled, "Status of Certain Current
CBOT Rules and Regulations as a Result of the Restructuring Transactions." We
urge you to review this summary carefully before voting on the restructuring
transactions. Of course, other changes to the rules and regulations not related
to the restructuring transactions may be implemented from time to time after
the date of this document in accordance with the provisions of our certificate
of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations.
Board of Directors
On October 16, 2001, our board of directors approved and adopted amendments
to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which, if approved by our
members, would authorize our board of directors to delay the next annual
election, which is currently scheduled for December 2001, until no later than
March 31, 2002, reduce the size of our board of directors from 18 members to
nine members at the first annual election following timely approval of the
restructuring transactions by our members, clarify our board of directors'
discretion as to the timing of its regular meetings and make certain other
conforming changes. A special meeting of the members for the purpose of voting
on such amendments has been scheduled for October 31, 2001. If our members
approve such amendments and separately approve the restructuring transactions
in a timely manner, our board of directors will be reduced in size from 18
directors to nine directors in connection with the next annual election, which
will be held as soon as reasonably practicable following membership approval of
the restructuring transactions, but in no event later than March 31, 2002. At
such annual election, our members will elect eight new directors to serve on
the nine-member board of directors with the then current chairman of the board
continuing to serve in such capacity as the ninth member of such board. Upon
completion of the restructuring transactions, the new directors elected to
serve on the nine-member board of directors will continue to serve on the
boards of directors of both CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary until the
next annual meeting of each such corporation.
If the amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are not
approved by our members or the membership vote on the restructuring
transactions does not occur in a timely manner, and, as a result, the size of
our board of directors is not reduced from 18 directors to nine directors prior
to the completion of the restructuring transactions, the certificate of
incorporation and bylaws of CBOT Holdings will provide that the then current
18-member board of directors will continue as the boards of directors of CBOT
Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary immediately following completion of the
restructuring transactions. The size of the board of directors of CBOT Holdings
will thereafter be reduced to nine directors in connection with a special
meeting of stockholders, to be held as soon as reasonably practicable following
completion of the restructuring transactions. At such special meeting, the
stockholders will elect eight new directors to serve on the nine-member board
of directors with the then current chairman of the board continuing to serve in
such capacity as the ninth member of such board. In connection with the
election of directors to the new nine-member board of directors of CBOT
Holdings, it is anticipated that CBOT Holdings, as the sole Class A member of
the CBOT subsidiary, will elect each of the newly-elected directors serving on
the nine-member board of directors of CBOT Holdings as directors of the CBOT
subsidiary. Each director of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary will be
elected to serve as a director until the next annual meeting of each such
corporation and will not be subject to term limits.
138
In order to ensure that the board of directors of CBOT Holdings is generally
identical in size and composition to the board of directors of the CBOT
subsidiary, it will be a qualification for service as a director of the CBOT
subsidiary that such director also serve on the board of directors of CBOT
Holdings. The nine-member boards of directors of CBOT Holdings and the CBOT
subsidiary will each consist of the chairman of the board, five directors who
are Class B members of the CBOT subsidiary, two directors who are "independent"
within the meaning of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of CBOT
Holdings and one director who is "at-large," or generally not subject to
qualifications. We currently expect that the president and chief executive
officer of CBOT Holdings will be nominated for election as the at-large
director.
Change of Control Provisions
Currently, our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, rules and regulations
do not contain robust change of control provisions.
CBOT Holdings will establish a number of change of control provisions that
may have the effect of encouraging persons considering unsolicited tender
offers or other unilateral takeover proposals to negotiate with the board of
directors of CBOT Holdings rather than pursue non-negotiated takeover attempts.
These provisions will include, among other things:
. advance notice requirements in connection with stockholder meetings;
. elimination of the ability of stockholders to call stockholder meetings;
. a prohibition on the ability of stockholders to take action by written
consent;
. supermajority stockholder approval requirements in connection with the
amendment of the bylaws; and
. the application of the provisions of the Delaware anti-takeover statute.
In addition, we currently anticipate that, in the event CBOT Holdings were
to conduct an underwritten public offering in the future, the board of
directors would be asked to consider, and may adopt, a stockholder rights plan.
For more information about these provisions, see "Description of Capital
Stock--Other Provisions." We have no current plan or intention to conduct any
such offering.
These provisions could have the following effects, among others:
. delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control;
. delaying, deferring or preventing the removal of existing management;
. deterring potential acquirors from making an offer to CBOT's Holdings'
stockholders; and
. limiting any opportunity of CBOT Holdings' stockholders to realize
premiums over prevailing market or other prices of CBOT Holdings' common
stock in connection with offers by potential acquirors.
This could be the case notwithstanding that a majority of CBOT Holdings'
stockholders might benefit from such a change in control or offer.
Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law and subject to certain exceptions, stockholders of CBOT
Holdings will have appraisal rights in connection with a merger or
consolidation of CBOT Holdings with another entity. Appraisal rights allow a
stockholder to dissent from the merger or consolidation and receive the fair
value of the stockholder's shares in cash. Appraisal rights will also generally
be available to the members of the CBOT subsidiary, as they are presently
available to CBOT members, in connection with a merger or consolidation of the
CBOT subsidiary with another entity. Under Delaware law, however, appraisal
rights are not available in connection with a merger or consolidation of two
nonstock corporations and, accordingly, appraisal rights are not available to
any CBOT members in connection with the restructuring transactions.
139
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Common Stock
The 39,802,650 shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings to be distributed in
connection with the restructuring transactions will generally be subject to a
complete restriction on transfer for the first 270 days following the date the
common stock is issued. Thereafter, 15%, 25%, 25% and 35% of the shares of
common stock of CBOT Holdings will be eligible for transfer after the date that
is 270, 450, 630 and 810 days following the date the common stock is issued,
respectively. Notwithstanding these restrictions on transfer, stockholders may
transfer all, but not less than all, of the shares of common stock of CBOT
Holdings associated with a Class B membership and, to the extent applicable, a
Class C membership, in the CBOT subsidiary if all such shares of common stock
are transferred together with the associated Class B membership and, to the
extent applicable, Class C membership. The certificate of incorporation of CBOT
Holdings will grant authority to the board of directors to remove or reduce
this restriction on transfer of the common stock if it determines, in its sole
and absolute discretion, that such action is appropriate. After expiration of
the transfer restrictions, the shares of common stock will be freely tradable
without restriction under the Securities Act, except for any such shares which
may be received by "affiliates" as defined under the Securities Act.
In addition, a holder of a Class C membership in the CBOT subsidiary seeking
to become a member of the Chicago Board Options Exchange must hold 25,000
shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings and one Series B-1, Class B membership
in the CBOT subsidiary, along with such Class C membership, in each case
subject to certain adjustments, in order to be eligible to become a member of
the Chicago Board Options Exchange without having to purchase a membership on
such exchange.
Common stock of CBOT Holdings received in connection with the restructuring
transactions by "affiliates" may be resold only pursuant to further
registration under the Securities Act or in transactions that are exempt from
registration under the Securities Act.
Sales of substantial amounts of common stock of CBOT Holdings in the open
market, or the availability of such shares for sale, could adversely affect the
price of our common stock and/or our other capital stock.
140
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
OF THE RESTRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS
The following general discussion constitutes the opinion of Kirkland &
Ellis, tax counsel to the CBOT, as to the material U.S. federal income tax
consequences of completion of the restructuring transactions, subject to the
qualifications described below. This opinion is based upon the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, the United States Treasury Department regulations
promulgated thereunder, judicial authority and current administrative rulings
and practice now in effect, all of which are subject to change at any time,
including with possible retroactive effect, or different interpretations. This
opinion does not discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may
be relevant to a particular CBOT member in light of such member's particular
circumstances or to CBOT members subject to special treatment under the U.S.
federal income tax laws, and this opinion does not discuss any aspects of
state, local or foreign tax laws.
In issuing rulings to other exchanges involved in the process of
demutualization, the Internal Revenue Service has adopted the position that:
. the equity component of a membership or stock is to be treated as
separate property from the trading rights associated with that membership
or stock so that the demutualization will be treated, in effect, as two
exchanges, an exchange of the equity components and an exchange of the
trading rights; and
. the taxability of each exchange must be tested under the relevant
provisions of the Code applicable to the particular property rights.
Thus, we understand that, under this IRS position, the exchange of the equity
components will be tested for tax-free status under the corporate
reorganization or corporate formation provisions, as applicable, and the
exchange of the trading rights will be treated as taxable or not based on
whether there is any significant modification in the legal rights associated
with those rights under Code Section 1001, which provides for recognition of
gain or loss on the sale or exchange of property. The IRS has not taken a
position on whether, even if there is a significant modification of the trading
rights, the exchange would nevertheless constitute a tax-free exchange of like-
kind property under Code Section 1031.
Based upon the foregoing, it is the opinion of Kirkland & Ellis that:
. No gain or loss will be recognized by a member with respect to the
receipt of common stock of CBOT Holdings or the Class A, Class B or Class
C memberships of the CBOT subsidiary, including any associated right to
trade on the CBOT or Chicago Board Options Exchange. The IRS may take the
position that the Class C memberships in the CBOT subsidiary represents a
separate trading right from that relating to the right to trade on the
CBOT itself.
. If the foregoing exchanges do not result in the recognition of gain or
loss, the aggregate basis in a member's current membership will carry
over to the property received and must be allocated to the various
components. If the equity rights and the trading rights are treated as
separate property for tax purposes, the basis in the equity rights will
be allocated among the equity rights received in proportion to their fair
market values, and the basis in the existing trading rights will carry
over to the basis of the trading rights received. It is not entirely
clear how basis will be allocated between trading rights and equity
rights because no separate market exists for those property rights.
Members who intend to sell some but not all of their stock or memberships
should consult their own tax advisors.
. The holding period of the common stock of CBOT Holdings or the Class B or
Class C memberships of the CBOT subsidiary, will include the period for
which such person's current membership has been held, provided that such
membership is held as a capital asset or property described in Code
Section 1231 on the date of the distribution of the stock or memberships,
as the case may be.
. The CBOT will not recognize any gain or loss upon its demutualization and
creation of a holding company structure.
141
It is a condition to the CBOT's obligation to complete the restructuring
transactions that it receive a private letter ruling from the IRS generally to
the effect that receipt by members of Class B and Class C memberships in the
CBOT subsidiary and a private letter ruling or an opinion of counsel that
receipt by CBOT Holdings of a Class A membership in the CBOT subsidiary and
receipt by members of common stock of CBOT Holdings, in form and substance
satisfactory to our board of directors, will have the foregoing effects. The
CBOT expects to file a request for the ruling with the IRS in the near future.
Because of the novelty and complexity of the restructuring transactions, it is
unclear at this time whether the IRS will issue a favorable ruling or, if the
IRS is willing to issue a ruling, when the ruling will be received. Because
none of the other exchanges in the process of demutualization has presented the
IRS with facts identical to those of the CBOT or the restructuring transactions
described in this document, in particular with respect to the capitalization
and the Chicago Board Options Exchange exercise right, no assurance can be
given that the IRS will issue a favorable ruling or, if so, how long it will
take to obtain such a ruling. Any such ruling would generally be binding on the
IRS. Although an IRS ruling can be revoked or modified retroactively under some
extraordinary circumstances, we are not aware of any such circumstances that
would cause the IRS to revoke or modify any such ruling with respect to the
restructuring transactions.
The CBOT currently anticipates that the receipt of cash payments by the
limited partners of Ceres pursuant to the reorganization of our electronic
trading business will be taxable to such limited partners.
Because of the complexity of the tax laws, and because the tax consequences
of the restructuring transactions to you may be affected by matters not
discussed in this section, you are urged to consult your own tax advisor with
respect to your own particular circumstances and with respect to the specific
tax consequences of the restructuring transactions to you, including the
applicability and effect of state, local and foreign tax laws and any proposed
changes in applicable tax laws.
142
SPECIAL MEETING AND PROXY INFORMATION
Persons Making the Solicitation
The proxy solicitation being made pursuant to this document is being
conducted on behalf of our board of directors.
Time and Place of Special Meeting
The special meeting will be held on , , 2001 at 2:30 p.m.,
Central time, in the Visitor Center Theater, Fifth Floor, at our executive
offices located at 141 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Matters To Be Approved
Full Members and Associate Members are being asked to approve each of the
following three propositions relating to the restructuring transactions
described more fully in this document:
(1) the approval and adoption of the agreement and plan of merger,
which will facilitate the demutualization of the CBOT;
(2) ratification of the August 7, 2001 agreement relating to the
exercise right entered into by the CBOT and the Chicago Board Options
Exchange; and
(3) the approval of all other matters relating to the restructuring
transactions, including, among other things a new certificate of
incorporation and by laws for CBOT Holdings and the CBOT subsidiary and
certain changes to the rules and regulations which, collectively, will
facilitate the modernization of certain aspects of our corporate governance
structure and the reorganization of our electronic trading business.
Although you are being asked to approve each of these three propositions
separately, each of these propositions is related to, and expressly conditioned
upon the approval of, the other propositions. This means that we will not take
any one or more of these actions relating to the restructuring transactions
without taking all three actions. Accordingly, unless ALL THREE of the
propositions relating to the restructuring transactions are approved by the
requisite vote of the members as described in this document, the restructuring
transactions will NOT have been approved by the members and, accordingly, none
of them will be completed.
Eligibility to Vote
Although this document will be mailed to all members, you are eligible to
vote at the special meeting only if you are a Full Member or Associate Member
as of the date for the special meeting of the membership at which a vote on the
restructuring transactions will be taken. In accordance with our certificate of
incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs are not
eligible to vote on the restructuring transactions.
Available Votes; Required Vote
Currently, there are 1,402 Full Members and 786 Associate Members. Under our
certificate of incorporation, bylaws and rules and regulations, each Full
Member will be entitled to one vote for each Full Membership owned and each
Associate Member will have one-sixth of a vote for each Associate Membership
owned. The restructuring transactions will be approved if Full Members and
Associate Members, voting together as a single class based upon their
respective voting rights, cast at least 300 votes at the special meeting,
whether in person or by proxy, and at least a majority of the votes are cast in
favor of all three of the propositions relating to the restructuring
transactions.
143
Under our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, rules and regulations, GIMs,
COMs and IDEMs are not entitled to vote on the restructuring transactions.
Our directors and officers held memberships as of June 30, 2001 entitling
them to cast an aggregate of 18 1/2 votes on the proposal, which would
represent about 1.2% of the total votes that may be cast.
Board Recommendation
Our board of directors has determined that the restructuring transactions
are in the best interests of the CBOT and its members and that the
restructuring transactions are fair to each class of CBOT membership. Our board
of directors has approved the restructuring transactions and recommends that
you vote "FOR" approval of the restructuring transactions, including ALL THREE
of the propositions relating to the restructuring transactions. Unless ALL
THREE of these propositions are approved, the restructuring transactions will
NOT have been approved by the members and, accordingly, will NOT be completed.
Manner of Voting; Costs
You may vote on the restructuring transactions by attending the special
meeting in person and registering your vote. You may also vote by completing
the enclosed proxy ballot and submitting it in accordance with its
instructions.
In connection with the proxy ballot solicitation, please note the following
instructions:
. Please mark the enclosed proxy ballot with respect to each proposition
and provide your signature, printed name and date where indicated, and
enclose and seal the completed proxy ballot in the gold envelope
addressed to the Secretary of the CBOT. Each proxy ballot must be signed
in order to be effective.
. Print your name in the upper left-hand corner of the gold envelope and
deliver or mail it to the Secretary's Office. Alternatively, you may
submit your completed proxy ballot to the Secretary's Office by
depositing the proxy ballot in the ballot box located in the fourth floor
lobby of our offices between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 2:15 p.m.,
Central time, on , 2001.
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the meeting by:
. sending written notice to Paul J. Draths at the Secretary's Office, Board
of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., 141 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, IL 60604;
. submitting a later dated proxy; or
. attending the special meeting and voting in person.
Attendance at the special meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy.
All properly executed and unrevoked proxies will be voted at the special
meeting or at any adjournment of the special meeting.
You may vote "FOR," "AGAINST" OR "ABSTAIN" in the vote on the restructuring
transactions. You should understand that an abstention will not have the legal
effect of voting against the proposal but will be relevant to determining
whether 300 votes have been cast, which is necessary for the proposal to be
approved. A proxy received without an indication as to how it is to be voted
with respect to any of the three proposals constituting the restructuring
transactions will be voted "FOR" such proposal. A proxy with respect to such
proposal that has more than one box marked for a given proposal, e.g., both
"FOR" and "AGAINST," will not be counted as a vote cast. Your proxy must be
received prior to 2:15 p.m., Central time, on , 2001 to be counted.
To obtain a replacement proxy, please call Paul J. Draths, Secretary of the
CBOT, at (312) 435-3500 between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Central
time.
144
All proxies, ballots and tabulations that identify the vote of a particular
member will be kept confidential, except as necessary to allow the third-party
inspectors designated with respect to the vote on the restructuring to certify
the voting results or to meet other legal requirements. At the CBOT's request,
such inspectors may provide the CBOT with a list of members who have not voted
and periodic status reports on the aggregate vote. These status reports may
include breakdowns of vote totals by different types of membership classes.
However, it is currently expected that the CBOT will not be able to determine
how individual members voted.
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by us. In addition to
solicitation by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies
in person or by telephone.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed
upon for CBOT Holdings by Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell. Certain legal
matters relating to U.S. federal income tax considerations in connection with
the restructuring transactions will be passed upon for the CBOT by Kirkland &
Ellis. Kirkland & Ellis has in the past represented the CBOT and its board of
directors and continues to represent the CBOT and its board of directors in
connection with various matters. Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell acts as
special Delaware counsel to the CBOT.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of the Board of Trade of the City of
Chicago, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000 included in this
prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as
stated in their report appearing herein and elsewhere in the registration
statement, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph regarding the restatement of the 1999 and 1998
consolidated financial statements by the CBOT to present Ceres as a
consolidated subsidiary, and have been so included in reliance upon the report
of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with
respect to the shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings being offered in
connection with the restructuring transactions.
This proxy statement and prospectus, which constitutes a part of the
registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in
the registration statement. Consistent with the rules and regulations of the
SEC, some items of information are contained in exhibits to the registration
statement. Statements made in this proxy statement and prospectus as to the
content of any contract, agreement or other document filed or incorporated by
reference as an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily
complete. You should refer to the corresponding exhibit for a more complete
description of the relevant matter and read all statements in this proxy
statement and prospectus with due consideration of that exhibit.
Following effectiveness of the registration statement, CBOT Holdings will be
required to file periodic reports and other information with the SEC. The SEC
filings of CBOT Holdings are available to the public at the SEC's web site at
http://www.sec.gov.
145
APPENDIX A
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Independent Auditors' Report.............................................. A-2
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2000 and
1999..................................................................... A-3
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998............................................................ A-4
Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity for the Years Ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.................................................. A-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998...................................................... A-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................ A-7
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30,
2001 and December 31, 2000 (Unaudited)................................... A-20
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Six Months Ended June
30, 2001 and 2000 (Unaudited)............................................ A-21
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity for the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 (Unaudited)................................. A-22
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000 (Unaudited)....................................... A-23
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).......... A-24
A-1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Members
of the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial
condition of the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the "CBOT") as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related
consolidated statements of income, members' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the CBOT's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Board of Trade of the City
of Chicago, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2000 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the
accompanying 1999 and 1998 consolidated financial statements have been
restated.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 14, 2001
(March 2, 2001 as to Note 13)
A-2
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
December 31, 2000 and 1999
(in thousands)
ASSETS 2000 1999
------ -------- --------
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Held under deposit and membership transfers.............. $ 4,653 $ 4,458
Unrestricted............................................. 23,552 17,991
-------- --------
Total cash and cash equivalents........................ 28,205 22,449
Accounts receivable, net................................... 20,920 16,733
Prepaid expenses and other................................. 3,129 2,927
Income taxes receivable.................................... 127 7,234
-------- --------
Total current assets................................... 52,381 49,343
Property and equipment
Land....................................................... 34,234 34,234
Buildings and equipment.................................... 305,922 293,416
Furnishings and fixtures................................... 153,504 173,677
Computer software and systems.............................. 50,203 26,760
Construction in progress................................... 938 826
-------- --------
Total property and equipment........................... 544,801 528,913
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization............. 239,745 219,507
-------- --------
Property and equipment--net............................ 305,056 309,406
Other assets................................................. 14,757 14,630
-------- --------
Total assets................................................. $372,194 $373,379
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
-------------------------------
Current liabilities
Accounts payable........................................... $ 17,805 $ 20,087
Accrued real estate taxes.................................. 8,500 8,650
Accrued pension liabilities................................ 844 2,732
Accrued exchange fee refunds............................... 384 2,205
Accrued liabilities........................................ 7,954 3,236
Due to CBOT/Eurex Alliance................................. 8,939 --
Funds held for deposit and membership transfers............ 4,653 4,458
Note payable............................................... 9,282 --
Current portion of long-term debt.......................... 18,014 6,500
Other current liabilities.................................. 155 408
-------- --------
Total current liabilities.............................. 76,530 48,276
Deferred income taxes........................................ 28,572 26,755
Long-term debt............................................... 64,286 87,500
Other liabilities............................................ 11,486 9,874
-------- --------
Total long-term liabilities............................ 104,344 124,129
-------- --------
Total liabilities...................................... 180,874 172,405
Members' equity.............................................. 191,320 200,974
-------- --------
Total liabilities and members' equity........................ $372,194 $373,379
======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements
A-3
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
(in thousands)
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Revenues:
Exchange fees.................................. $101,981 $102,545 $112,115
Market data.................................... 61,060 54,028 53,100
Building....................................... 24,530 22,653 21,876
Services....................................... 17,848 20,279 16,907
Dues........................................... 5,484 389 414
Other.......................................... 2,016 3,002 826
-------- -------- --------
Total revenues............................... 212,919 202,896 205,238
Expenses:
Salaries and benefits.......................... 56,391 64,133 57,991
Depreciation and amortization.................. 40,013 36,140 33,764
Professional services.......................... 32,459 32,490 19,924
General and administrative expenses............ 52,299 50,988 45,267
Building operating costs....................... 22,584 23,171 22,572
Programs....................................... 3,539 7,280 8,802
Other.......................................... 8,261 327 --
-------- -------- --------
Total expenses............................... 215,546 214,529 188,320
-------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from operations.................... (2,627) (11,633) 16,918
Interest income.................................. 1,242 1,052 1,947
Interest expense................................. 6,773 6,774 7,170
-------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle........ (8,158) (17,355) 11,695
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Current........................................ 133 (1,198) 3,160
Deferred....................................... 1,817 (1,697) 1,891
-------- -------- --------
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes... 1,950 (2,895) 5,051
-------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle......................... (10,108) (14,460) 6,644
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle--net of tax benefit of $2,026......... -- 2,920 --
-------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before minority interest........... (10,108) (17,380) 6,644
Minority interest in (income) loss of
subsidiaries.................................... -- 6,933 (38)
-------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)................................ $(10,108) $(10,447) $ 6,606
======== ======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements
A-4
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS' EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
(in thousands)
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
BALANCE--Beginning of year........................ $200,974 $211,047 $203,911
Net income (loss)................................. (10,108) (10,447) 6,606
Capital contributions............................. 454 374 530
-------- -------- --------
BALANCE--End of year.............................. $191,320 $200,974 $211,047
======== ======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements
A-5
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
(in thousands)
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)............................... $(10,108) $(10,447) $ 6,606
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash flows from operating activities:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle.................................... -- 4,946 --
Depreciation and amortization................. 40,013 36,140 33,764
Loss on disposition of property and equipment. 3,800 220 1,421
Deferred income taxes (benefit)............... 1,817 (1,697) 1,891
Minority interest in income (loss) of
subsidiaries................................. -- (6,933) 38
Other......................................... -- (19) (5)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable........................... (4,187) 2,551 (1,411)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets..... (202) 28 249
Income taxes receivable....................... 7,107 241 (4,489)
Other assets.................................. (949) (4,187) (5,328)
Accounts payable.............................. (2,282) (6,058) 4,824
Accrued real estate taxes..................... (150) 97 307
Accrued pension liabilities................... (1,888) 749 178
Accrued exchange fee refunds.................. (1,821) 1,448 (114)
Accrued liabilities........................... 4,718 1,308 (263)
Due to CBOT/Eurex Alliance.................... 8,939 -- --
Funds held for deposit and membership
transfers.................................... 195 (862) (2,208)
Other current liabilities..................... (253) (29) 19
Other liabilities............................. 1,612 (187) (3,152)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash flows from operating activities.... 46,361 17,309 32,327
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment........... (38,497) (25,165) (26,985)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment.... 356 390 --
Investment in CBOT/Eurex Alliance............... (500) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net cash flows from investing activities.... (38,641) (24,775) (26,985)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments of mortgage note and unsecured note.... -- -- (1,662)
Payment of 1997 revolving credit agreement...... (19,000) (5,000) (6,000)
Proceeds from 2000 secured revolving credit
agreement...................................... 7,300 -- --
Note payable.................................... 9,282 -- --
Capital contributions from members.............. 454 374 530
Capital contributions from minority interest in
subsidiaries................................... -- 723 3,280
Distributions to minority interest in
subsidiaries................................... -- (400) (5,943)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash flows from financing activities.... (1,964) (4,303) (9,795)
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents..................................... 5,756 (11,769) (4,453)
Cash and cash equivalents--Beginning of year..... 22,449 34,218 38,671
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents--End of year........... $ 28,205 $ 22,449 $ 34,218
======== ======== ========
Cash paid for:
Interest........................................ $ 6,166 $ 6,797 $ 6,943
======== ======== ========
Income taxes.................................... $ -- $ -- $ 8,917
======== ======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements
A-6
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
1. Summary of significant accounting policies
Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Board of
Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiaries, including
Electronic Chicago Board of Trade, Inc. ("eCBOT") established in 2000, and its
controlled subsidiary, Ceres Trading Limited Partnership ("Ceres"), which holds
a 50% ownership interest in CBOT/Eurex Alliance LLC ("CBOT/Eurex Alliance")
(collectively, the "CBOT"). The CBOT accounts for its interest in CBOT/Eurex
Alliance under the equity method. The CBOT's investment in CBOT/Eurex Alliance
is included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Subsequent to the issuance of CBOT's consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 1999, management determined that Ceres should have
been accounted for as a consolidated subsidiary rather than under the equity
method of accounting. This determination was made based on a reassessment of
the rights of the limited partners of Ceres and a determination that such
limited partners do not have rights that allow them to participate in the
management of Ceres or rights that limit the CBOT's ability to control the
operations of Ceres. As required by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20,
the accompanying 1999 and 1998 consolidated financial statements have been
restated to correct the error in accounting for Ceres and to present Ceres as a
consolidated subsidiary of the CBOT. A summary of the significant effects of
the restatement is as follows (in thousands):
1999 1998
------------------- -------------------
As As
Previously As Previously As
Reported Restated Reported Restated
---------- -------- ---------- --------
Current assets.................... $ 49,838 $ 49,343 $ $
Total assets...................... 366,101 373,379
Current liabilities............... 40,998 48,276
Total liabilities................. 165,127 172,405
Members' equity................... 200,974 200,974
Revenues.......................... 182,905 202,896 181,978 205,238
Net income (loss)................. (10,447) (10,447) 6,606 6,606
In conjunction with its proposed restructuring plans to demutualize the
organization, on January 26, 2001 the CBOT filed its Registration Statement
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Operations
The CBOT has experienced losses in 1999 and 2000. In addition, CBOT has debt
obligations coming due in the first half of 2001. As a result of these
circumstances, management of CBOT has established a plan to improve cash flow
and working capital. To generate cash earlier in 2001, the CBOT has accelerated
the period by which member dues are billed and collected, from a quarterly to
an annual billing cycle, with the 2001 dues payable January 1, 2001. Management
developed, and the board of directors has approved, the CBOT's operating budget
for 2001. This plan includes the full year impact of rate increases to exchange
fees implemented September 1, 2000 and certain reductions to capital and
operational spending. In addition, the CBOT plans to defer certain
technological enhancements not deemed crucial to the operation of the open
outcry system and of the a/c/e system. Trading revenue assumed by the plan is
based on levels of trading historically experienced by the CBOT, but lower than
that for 2000.
A-7
Use of estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment, excluding land, are reported at historical cost, net
of accumulated depreciation. Land is reported at cost. Computer software and
systems include purchased and internally developed software. Depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets as follows:
Buildings and equipment.................................... 10 to 60 years
Furnishings and fixtures................................... 3 to 10 years
Computer software and systems.............................. 3 to 5 years
On October 1, 1999, the CBOT, through Ceres, entered into a Software
Licensing Agreement (the "License") with Deutsche Borse AG and the Swiss Stock
Exchange for use of software for trading financial derivative products. The
License continues into perpetuity unless terminated by Ceres and is being
amortized over 3 years. The cost of such license is included in Computer
Software and Systems in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Revenue recognition
The largest source of the CBOT's operating revenues is exchange fees. These
fees are recognized as revenue in the same period that the trades are made
through the CBOT.
The CBOT provides real time and delayed market data information to market
data vendors regarding the prices of the futures and options on futures
contracts traded through the CBOT. Fees for market data, which are based on the
number of subscribers are remitted to the CBOT by market data vendors. The CBOT
recognizes revenue for market data based on quotation services provided to
market data vendors on a monthly basis. These revenues are included in Market
Data in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Revenues from the rental of office space is recognized over the life of the
lease term utilizing the straight- line method and is included in Building in
the Consolidated Statements of Income. All service revenues and other revenues
are recognized when earned.
Dues from members are recognized over the assessment period. The CBOT
assessed dues on a quarterly basis beginning in June 2000. Prior to June 2000,
dues had been waived by the CBOT as a result of its cash flow and working
capital position. The waiver of dues by the CBOT in previous periods had no
impact on the CBOT's billing of annual dues for 2001 on January 1, 2001.
Other revenue results primarily from fines levied on members and member's
firms for rule infractions, as determined by CBOT's regulatory committees and
the board of directors. The fines are recognized as revenue when assessed.
Income taxes
The CBOT and its wholly owned subsidiaries file a consolidated federal
income tax return. Income taxes are determined using the asset and liability
method, which requires deferred taxes be adjusted to reflect the tax rates at
which future taxable amounts will be settled and realized. The provision for
federal income taxes excludes any amount related to the minority interest's
portion of income or loss since they are required to report their respective
shares of income or loss in their individual tax returns.
A-8
Cash flows
For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash and cash
equivalents include highly liquid investments with maturities of three months
or less from date of purchase.
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets to be held and used by the CBOT are reviewed to determine
whether any events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of the asset may not be recoverable. The CBOT bases its evaluation on
such impairment indicators as the nature of the assets, the future economic
benefit of the assets, any historical or future profitability measurements, as
well as other external market conditions or factors that may be present. If
such impairment indicators are present or other factors exist that would
indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, the CBOT
determines whether an impairment has occurred through the use of an
undiscounted cash flows analysis of assets at the lowest level for which
identifiable cash flows exist. In the event of an impairment, the CBOT
recognizes a loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the
estimated value of the asset as measured using quoted market prices or, in the
absence of quoted market prices, a discounted cash flow analysis.
Operating Segments
Management has identified three reportable operating segments, Exchange
Trading, Building Services and Electronic Trading. These represent the services
provided by CBOT. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as
described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The CBOT evaluates
segment reporting based on revenues and income from operations.
Derivative Instruments Held for Purposes Other Than Trading
The CBOT entered into derivative contracts as a means of reducing the CBOT's
foreign exchange exposures. At inception these contracts were evaluated in
order to determine if they qualified for hedge accounting treatment and are
accounted for either on a deferral, accrual or market value basis, depending on
the nature of the CBOT's hedge strategy and the method used to account for the
hedged item. Hedge criteria include demonstrating the manner in which the hedge
will reduce risk, identifying the specific asset, liability or firm commitment
being hedged, and citing the time horizon being hedged. A monthly evaluation is
performed to ensure that continuing correlation exists between the hedge and
the item being hedged.
Adoption of new accounting policies
In 1999, the CBOT adopted Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-1, "Accounting
for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." SOP
98-1 provides guidance on accounting for the costs of computer software
developed or modified for internal use. The adoption of SOP 98-1 did not have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In 1999, the CBOT also adopted SOP 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up
Activities." SOP 98-5 requires that start-up activities be expensed as
incurred. Previously, start-up activities were capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over 60 months. The cumulative effect of this change in
accounting principle of $2,920,000, net of tax benefit of $2,026,000, is
reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December
31, 1999.
Recent accounting pronouncements
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended and interpreted,
requires recognition of all derivative instruments in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition as either assets or liabilities and the
measurement of those instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 133 also requires
changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments to be recorded each
period in current earnings or other comprehensive income depending on the
intended use of the derivatives. If the derivative is designated in a fair-
value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the
A-9
derivative and the hedged item will be recognized in earnings. If the
derivative is designated in a cash-flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the
derivative will be recorded in other comprehensive income and will be
recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income when the hedged item
affects earnings. SFAS No. 133 defines new requirements for designation and
documentation of hedging relationships as well as ongoing effectiveness
assessments in order to use hedge accounting. For a derivative that does not
qualify as a hedge, changes in fair value will be recognized in earnings. SFAS
No. 133 is required to be adopted by the CBOT effective January 1, 2001. The
CBOT expects that at January 1, 2001, it will record approximately $100,000 as
a cumulative transition adjustment to earnings relating to derivatives not
designated as hedges prior to adoption of SFAS No. 133 and to derivatives
designated in fair-value type hedges prior to adopting SFAS No. 133, and
approximately $500,000 in other comprehensive income as a cumulative transition
adjustment for derivatives designated in cash-flow type hedges prior to
adopting SFAS No. 133.
Prior year reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in prior year amounts to conform to
current year presentations.
2. Minority Interests in Subsidiaries
Ceres was formed by the CBOT, as general partner, for the purpose of
engaging in activities related to financial and futures markets. The CBOT,
through eCBOT, as general partner, holds a 10% interest in, and controls Ceres.
Furthermore, the limited partners in Ceres do not have restrictive rights that
would limit the CBOT's ability to control Ceres. Members of the CBOT are
limited partners of Ceres. Under the terms of the Ceres partnership agreement,
income and losses are allocated to the general partner and limited partners
based on their partnership interests. Losses in excess of limited partner
capital accounts are allocated to eCBOT, as general partner.
In 1997, Ceres acquired a 60% interest in Chicago Board Brokerage, LLC
("CBB"). During 1999, CBB was dissolved. In conjunction with the dissolution of
CBB, certain liabilities totaling approximately $789,000 were distributed to
and assumed by the CBOT. The CBOT made full payment in 1999.
Minority interests in subsidiaries includes the limited partners' interests
in Ceres and the minority interest in CBB.
3. Debt
Debt at December 31 consisted of the following (in thousands):
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Private placement senior notes, due in 2007, at
annual interest rate of 6.81%................... $75,000 $75,000 $75,000
Unsecured revolving credit agreement, due in
2001, at annual interest rate based on LIBOR
(6.13% and 5.11% at December 31, 1999 and 1998,
respectively), plus .3%......................... -- 19,000 24,000
Secured revolving credit agreement, due in 2001,
at an annual interest rate based on LIBOR
(6.6875% at December 31, 2000), plus .625%...... 7,300 -- --
------- ------- -------
Total........................................ 82,300 94,000 99,000
Less current portion............................. 18,014 6,500 --
------- ------- -------
Total........................................ $64,286 $87,500 $99,000
======= ======= =======
In August 2000, the CBOT entered into a secured revolving credit agreement,
under which the CBOT had borrowed $7,300,000 at December 31, 2000. The
borrowing base, secured by certain receivables of the CBOT, will fluctuate
based on receivable balances. The CBOT used the proceeds to repay the 1997
unsecured revolving credit agreement. The secured revolving credit agreement
contains convenants that require, among other things, that the CBOT maintain
specified levels of minimum net worth and meet defined financial ratios.
A-10
In March 1997, the CBOT issued through a private placement, $75,000,000 in
6.81% senior notes due in 2007. The CBOT entered into an unsecured revolving
credit agreement for an aggregate of $50,000,000, maturing in 2001, under which
the CBOT borrowed $30,000,000. The aggregate commitment under the unsecured
revolving credit agreement was reduced by 25% each year beginning in March
1998.
During 1999, the CBOT increased the borrowing capacity under its line of
credit agreement to $30,000,000. At December 31, 1999, there were no amounts
borrowed under this agreement. The agreement was cancelled in 2000.
The aggregated amount of principal repayment requirements of the secured
revolving credit agreement and the private placement senior notes as of
December 31, 2000 are as follows (in thousands):
2001............................. $18,014
2002............................. 10,714
2003............................. 10,714
2004............................. 10,714
2005 and thereafter.............. 32,144
Ceres has agreed to reimburse Deutsche Borse AG and the Swiss Stock Exchange
(collectively "Eurex") $9,282,000 at December 31, 2000 (10.2 million euros) for
certain software modifications for the a/c/e system. This amount, included in
note payable in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, is due at
various dates during the second quarter of 2001. Payment of 3 million euros
will be due immediately in the event at least 200,000 contracts are traded on
the a/c/e system for five consecutive days.
4. Income taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. These temporary
differences result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years.
Differences between financial reporting and tax bases arise most frequently
from differences in the timing of expense recognition.
Significant components of the CBOT's deferred tax assets and liabilities as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999 are as follows (in thousands):
2000 1999
------- -------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation........................................... $28,601 $29,988
Capitalized interest................................... 2,095 2,146
Other.................................................. 5,659 335
------- -------
Total deferred tax liabilities....................... 36,355 32,469
Deferred tax assets:
Employee and retiree benefit plans..................... 3,093 4,032
Other.................................................. 4,690 1,682
------- -------
Total deferred tax assets............................ 7,783 5,714
------- -------
Net deferred tax liabilities............................. $28,572 $26,755
======= =======
The CBOT has not established a valuation reserve at December 31, 2000 and
1999 as management believes that all deferred tax assets are fully realizable.
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective
income tax rate is as follows:
2000 1999 1998
----- ----- ----
Statutory federal income tax rate.................. (35.0)% (35.0)% 35.0%
State income tax rate, net of federal income tax
effect............................................ 1.4 (3.4) 5.1
Corporate restructuring costs...................... 42.3 5.9 --
Non-deductible expenses............................ 6.5 4.5 3.3
Other, net......................................... 8.7 0.2 (0.2)
----- ----- ----
Effective income tax rate.......................... 23.9% (27.8)% 43.2%
===== ===== ====
A-11
5. Membership
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the membership consisted of the following:
2000 1999
----- -----
Full memberships.............................................. 1,402 1,402
Associate memberships......................................... 779 770
GIMs.......................................................... 174 192
COMs.......................................................... 643 643
IDEMs......................................................... 641 641
All classes of membership generally have the same relative characteristics
with the exception of voting and trading rights and member preferences.
In accordance with the CBOT rules and regulations, the members preferences
in dissolution are commensurate with their class of membership. These
preferences along with their respective percentages are as follows:
Preferences Percentage
----------- ----------
Full members....................................... 1.0 77.7%
Associate memberships.............................. 0.167 13.0%
GIMs............................................... 0.11 8.5%
IDEMs.............................................. 0.005 0.4%
COMs............................................... 0.005 0.4%
------
100.0%
======
Dues on CBOT memberships were waived for each quarter in 1999 and 1998 as a
result of the CBOT's positive cash flow from operations and working capital
position. The CBOT reinstated dues on memberships in June 2000.
6. Benefit Plans
Substantially all employees of the CBOT are covered by a noncontributory,
defined benefit pension plan. The benefits of this plan are based primarily on
the years of service and the employees' average compensation levels. The CBOT's
funding policy is to contribute, annually, the maximum amount that can be
deducted for federal income tax purposes. The plan assets are primarily
invested in marketable debt and equity securities.
A-12
The following provides a reconciliation of pension benefit obligation, plan
assets, funded status and net periodic benefit expense of the plan as of and
for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
2000 1999
------- -------
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation, beginning of year....... $23,799 $22,676
Service cost................................ 1,678 1,575
Interest cost............................... 1,950 1,604
Actuarial loss (gain)....................... 1,635 (758)
Benefits paid............................... (2,710) (1,298)
------- -------
Benefit obligation, end of year............... $26,352 $23,799
======= =======
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1...... $14,141 $14,521
Actual return on plan assets................ 1,397 550
Company contributions....................... 5,031 368
Benefits paid............................... (2,710) (1,298)
------- -------
Fair value of plan assets at December 31...... $17,859 $14,141
======= =======
Funded status:
Funded status of the plan at December 31.... $(8,493) $(9,658)
Unrecognized cost:
Actuarial and investment net losses......... 7,156 4,870
Prior service cost.......................... 10 9
Transition obligation....................... (204) (409)
------- -------
Accrued benefit cost.......................... $(1,531) $(5,188)
======= =======
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- ------
The components of net periodic benefit cost
are as follows:
Service cost................................ $ 1,678 $ 1,575 $1,073
Interest cost............................... 1,950 1,604 1,327
Expected return on plan assets.............. (1,397) (1,306) (1,139)
Net amortization:
Transition asset.......................... (204) (204) (204)
Unrecognized prior service cost........... (1) 15 15
Unrecognized net loss..................... 394 278 --
------- ------- ------
Net periodic benefit expense................ $ 2,420 $ 1,962 $1,072
======= ======= ======
Accrued benefit costs are included in other long-term liabilities on the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
The assumptions used in the measurement of the pension benefit obligation as
of December 31 are as follows:
2000 1999
---- ----
Weighted average discount rate................................ 7.25% 6.5%
Expected return on plan assets................................ 9.0 9.0
Rate of compensation increase................................. 5.0 5.0
A-13
The CBOT has a retiree benefit plan which covers all eligible employees, as
defined. Employees retiring from the CBOT on or after age 55, who have at least
ten years of service, or after age 65 with five years of service, are entitled
to postretirement medical and life insurance benefits. The CBOT continues to
fund benefit costs on a pay-as-you-go basis. These costs totaled approximately
$80,700, $57,500 and $52,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively.
The following provides a reconciliation of postretirement obligation, plan
assets, funded status and net periodic benefit cost of the plan as of and for
the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
2000 1999
------- -------
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation, beginning of year......... $ 3,490 $ 3,468
Service cost.................................. 238 238
Interest cost................................. 285 250
Actuarial loss (gain)......................... 161 (408)
Benefits paid................................. (85) (58)
------- -------
Benefit obligation, end of year................. $ 4,089 $ 3,490
======= =======
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1........ $ -- $ --
Company contributions......................... 85 58
Benefits paid................................. (85) (58)
------- -------
Fair value of plan assets at December 31........ $ -- $ --
======= =======
Funded status:
Funded status of the plan at December 31...... $(4,089) $(3,490)
Unrecognized net gain......................... (1,035) (1,252)
Unrecognized transition obligation............ 1,558 1,688
------- -------
Accrued benefit cost............................ $(3,566) $(3,054)
======= =======
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- ----
The components of net periodic benefit cost are
as follows:
Service cost.................................. $ 237 $ 238 $169
Interest cost................................. 285 250 212
Expected return on plan assets................ -- -- --
Net amortization:
Transition liabilities...................... 130 130 130
Net gain.................................... (56) (31) (96)
------- ------- ----
Net periodic benefit cost....................... $ 596 $ 587 $415
======= ======= ====
Accrued benefit costs are included in other long-term liabilities on the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
The assumptions used in the measurement of the postretirement obligation as
of December 31 are as follows:
2000 1999
---- ----
Weighted average discount rate.................. 7.25% 6.5%
Rate of compensation increase................... 5.0 5.0
The assumed health care cost trend rate used in measuring the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation was 11% in 2000 and 1999 (decreasing by 1%
per year until a long-term rate of 5% is reached). If the health care cost
trend rate assumptions were increased by 1%, the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation as of December 31, 2000 would be increased by 10%. The
effect of this change on the sum of the service costs and interest cost would
be an increase of 11%. If the health care cost trend rate assumptions were
A-14
decreased by 1%, the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of
December 31, 2000 would be decreased by 8%. The effect of this change on the
sum of the service costs and interest cost would be a decrease of 11%.
In addition to the defined benefit plan, the CBOT maintains a qualified
savings plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan
is a defined contribution plan offered to eligible employees of the CBOT, who
meet certain length of service requirements and elect to participate in the
plan. The CBOT will make matching contributions to certain participants based
on a formula specified by the plan. The cost of these matching contributions
amounted to approximately $1,368,000, $1,370,000 and $1,268,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The CBOT also sponsors a
nonqualified supplemental pension plan for certain former employees. The
liability for this nonqualified plan is funded by life insurance policies on
the lives of the participating employees. The CBOT has established a trust for
the purpose of administering the nonqualified plan.
The CBOT provides a health plan which provides benefits (hospital, surgical,
major medical and short-term disability) covering full-time salaried employees
of the CBOT. The plan is self-funded by the CBOT as claims are paid. Employees
contribute specified amounts to extend coverage to eligible dependents.
7. Commitments
Certain office space, data processing and office equipment are leased.
Certain of these leases contain escalation clauses. Rental expense for the
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $2,173,000, $2,461,000 and
$2,902,000, respectively. The future minimum rental payments under
noncancelable leases in effect as of December 31, 2000, in the aggregate and
for the next five years, are as follows (in thousands):
2001.............................. $ 632
2002.............................. 287
2003.............................. 243
2004.............................. 187
2005.............................. 144
------
Total......................... $1,493
======
Building revenues relate primarily to the leasing of office and commercial
space, generally for periods ranging from one to five years. Future minimum
rentals receivable under noncancelable leases in effect as of December 31,
2000, in the aggregate and for the next five years, are as follows (in
thousands):
2001............................. $22,482
2002............................. 17,831
2003............................. 10,521
2004............................. 5,524
2005............................. 2,134
2006 and thereafter.............. 1,739
-------
Total........................ $60,231
=======
In June 1997, Dow Jones & Company; ("Dow Jones") agreed to license certain
indexes and trademark rights to the CBOT. The initial license fee remitted to
Dow Jones is being amortized over the term of the agreement and is included in
other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The
agreement, which expires September 30, 2002, requires the CBOT to pay Dow Jones
annual royalties, based on trading volumes with a minimum annual requirement of
$2.0 million.
The CBOT has established a policy, on Electronic Order Routing Systems
failure, that the maximum responsibility with respect to all claims from member
firms and floor brokers in any period of twelve consecutive months is not to
exceed $3,000,000.
A-15
Effective in 2000, Ceres entered into an alliance with Eurex for the trading
of financial derivative products on the a/c/e system. Ceres and Eurex each owns
50% of CBOT/Eurex Alliance. Ceres and Eurex contributed initial capital to
CBOT/Eurex Alliance in the amount of $500,000 each. No further capital
contributions are required pursuant to the terms of our alliance. CBOT/Eurex
Alliance and Ceres have commitments with Eurex, Deutsche Borse Systems and
Eurex Frankfort AG for approximately $117 million (120 million euros) as of
December 31, 2000 to fund the operations of the a/c/e system and additional
software enhancements. These payments are due at various times through 2003 as
follows in their approximate U.S. dollar equivalent as of December 31, 2000 (in
thousands):
2001 $36,183
2002 26,078
2003 12,770
As of December 31, 2000, the CBOT had paid in the aggregate about $33.7
million on behalf of the commitments to Eurex, Deutsche Borse Systems and Eurex
Frankfort AG and accrued about $7.7 million on behalf of the commitments.
Furthermore, as discussed in Note 3, Ceres has agreed to reimburse Deutsche
Borse AG and the Swiss Stock Exchange $9,282,000 at December 31, 2000, (10.2
million euros) for certain software modifications for the a/c/e system. This
amount is due at various dates during the second quarter of 2001.
Certain additional modifications for the a/c/e system developed by Deutsche
Borse AG may be implemented on the a/c/e system for which Ceres has agreed to
reimburse Deutsche Borse AG in the amount of $9.2 million at December 31, 2000
(9.8 million euros) payable at various dates between June 30, 2001 and June 30,
2002. The CBOT currently plans to defer further modifications or updates to the
a/c/e system.
The CBOT has employment agreements with certain members of management. In
addition, the CBOT entered into an agreement with its former President and
Chief Executive Officer, dated as of April 14, 2000, whereby his employment
agreement dated May 18, 1999, was terminated. The agreement sets forth certain
payments and benefits to include: approximately $1.9 million, paid on May 1,
2000; $1.4 million, payable on January 1 of each year from 2001 through 2003;
and certain medical, insurance and pension benefits. These costs are recognized
in other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
8. Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
On September 27, 2000, the CBOT entered into foreign exchange forward
contracts with a financial institution to hedge its risk of foreign currency
fluctuations related to certain commitments in Eurodollars to Eurex and related
entities. The notional amount of these contracts total about $29.0 million with
exchange rates ranging from .89429 to .91100 and maturities at various dates
through 2002 which correspond to the terms of the commitments. In December
2000, the CBOT decided not to pursue, at this time, certain software
enhancements for the a/c/e system. The CBOT then entered into about $9.8
million of foreign exchange forward contracts offsetting certain of the
contracts entered into in September 2000. Gains and losses on the forward
contracts, which are hedging commitments, are deferred, and totaled a gain of
about $500,000 at December 31, 2000. A net gain of about $800,000 at December
31, 2000 on all other forward contracts is recognized currently in earnings and
is included in other revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
9. Litigation and Settlement
The CBOT has been named as a defendant in various lawsuits. Although the
ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be presently determined, it is the
opinion of the management of the CBOT that resolution of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Management believes that the right of Full Members to become members of the
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. ("CBOE") will be preserved after the
proposed restructuring transactions. The CBOE has filed a proposed rule change
with the Securities and Exchange Commission whereby this right would be
terminated upon the occurrence of certain events. The CBOT initiated litigation
to protect this right and may take additional action to preserve this right.
Management believes that the outcome of these actions will not have a material
adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
A-16
As a result of the CBOT's proposed restructuring transactions, certain
Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs have instituted litigation against
certain Full Members and a proposed class of all Full Members challenging the
proposed allocation of shares to the Associate Members, GIMs, IDEMs and COMs.
Management believes that the complaint is without merit and intends to
vigorously defend the suit on behalf of the individual defendant Full Members.
Management further believes that these proceedings will not have any material
adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
In April 1998 and January 1999, CBB was named as a defendant in two lawsuits
that sought to enjoin CBB from using the software under a license agreement
with Market Data Corporation ("MDC"). In April 1999, CBB entered into
settlement agreements whereby all claims against CBB were dismissed and CBB
received $1.0 million from MDC, which is recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Income.
10. Deposits of U.S. Treasury Securities
The rules and regulations of the CBOT require certain minimum financial
requirements for agricultural regularity and conditions of regularity for
originators of GNMA collateralized depository receipts, maintenance of capital
requirements and deposits on pending arbitration matters. To satisfy these
requirements, firms have deposited U.S. Treasury securities with the CBOT.
These deposits are not considered assets and
liabilities of the CBOT, nor does any interest earned on these deposits accrue
to the CBOT. The aggregate market value of these securities was about $15.0
million as of December 31, 2000 and 1999.
A-17
11. Operating Segments
The CBOT has three reportable operating segments, the Chicago Board of
Trade, Inc. ("Exchange Trading"), C-B-T Corporation ("Building Services," a
wholly owned real estate subsidiary) and Ceres's Electronic Trading Division
("Electronic Trading"), which maintains the electronic trading system. The CBOT
evaluates segment performance based on revenues and income from operations.
Revenues for each segment are based on the type of trading used by the external
customers, or from tenants of the CBOT's buildings. Intercompany transactions
between segments have been eliminated. A summary by operating segment follows
(in thousands):
Exchange Building Electronic All
Trading Services Trading Other Total
-------- -------- ---------- ------- --------
Year Ended December 31, 2000
Revenues:
Exchange fees $ 83,789 $ -- $ 18,192 $ -- $101,981
Market data 61,060 -- -- -- 61,060
Building -- 24,530 -- -- 24,530
Services 17,848 -- -- -- 17,848
Members' dues 5,484 -- -- -- 5,484
Other 804 -- 1,020 192 2,016
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Total revenues 168,985 24,530 19,212 192 212,919
Depreciation and amortization 22,040 13,908 4,065 -- 40,013
Income (loss) from operations 21,836 (11,962) (12,618) 117 (2,627)
Total assets 100,531 236,342 35,321 -- 372,194
Capital expenditures 8,248 3,286 26,963 -- 38,497
Year Ended December 31, 1999
Revenues:
Exchange fees $ 83,913 $ -- $ 18,632 $ -- $102,545
Market data 53,962 -- -- 66 54,028
Building -- 22,653 -- -- 22,653
Services 20,279 -- -- -- 20,279
Members' dues 389 -- -- -- 389
Other 1,709 -- -- 1,293 3,002
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Total revenues 160,252 22,653 18,632 1,359 202,896
Depreciation and amortization 22,100 13,657 117 266 36,140
Income (loss) from operations 7,743 (14,175) (2,072) (3,129) (11,633)
Total assets 118,305 244,696 10,356 22 373,379
Capital expenditures 11,001 5,676 8,488 -- 25,165
Year Ended December 31, 1998
Revenues:
Exchange fees $ 89,365 $ -- $ 22,750 $ -- $112,115
Market data 53,012 -- -- 88 53,100
Building -- 21,876 -- -- 21,876
Services 16,907 -- -- -- 16,907
Members' dues 414 -- -- -- 414
Other 404 -- -- 422 826
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Total revenues 160,102 21,876 22,750 510 205,238
Depreciation and amortization 19,564 13,305 20 875 33,764
Income (loss) from operations 34,014 (14,001) 2,448 (5,543) 16,918
Total assets 130,585 250,620 7,107 12,659 400,971
Capital expenditures 20,038 4,122 701 2,124 26,985
A-18
12. Fair value of financial instruments
The CBOT believes that the carrying amount for certain of its financial
instruments is a reasonable estimate of fair value. Cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, prepaid expenses and other, and other assets are carried at amounts
which approximate fair value. Similarly, liabilities including accounts payable
and accrued liabilities, current portion of long-term debt, funds held for
deposit and membership transfers and other liabilities are carried at amounts
approximating fair value.
The carrying value of long-term debt approximates fair value. Fair value is
estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the CBOT's estimated
incremental borrowing rate on borrowings with similar terms and maturities.
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information
available to management as of December 31, 2000 and 1999. Although management
is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair
value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes
of these financial statements since that date, and current estimates of fair
value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
13. Subsequent Events
On February 15, 2001, a purchaser of the CBOT's market data filed a
voluntary bankruptcy petition under Chapter 11. As a result, the CBOT
established an allowance of about $2,100,000 for amounts receivable from this
entity.
In February 2001, the CBOT entered into an employment agreement with its new
president as well as amended two employment agreements with current executives
of the CBOT. The agreements call for, among other incentives and benefits,
payments in the aggregate of about $3,000,000 during 2001.
* * * * *
A-19
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited) (in thousands)
June 30, December 31,
ASSETS 2001 2000
------ -------- ------------
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Unrestricted......................................... $ 29,072 $ 23,552
Held under deposit and membership transfers.......... 1,511 4,653
Restricted........................................... 909 --
-------- --------
Total cash and cash equivalents.................... 31,492 28,205
Accounts receivable, net............................... 21,787 20,920
Other current assets................................... 1,961 3,256
-------- --------
Total current assets............................... 55,240 52,381
Property and equipment:
Land................................................... 34,234 34,234
Buildings and equipment................................ 306,520 305,922
Furnishings and fixtures............................... 148,625 153,504
Computer software and systems.......................... 56,665 48,682
Construction in progress............................... -- 938
-------- --------
Total property and equipment....................... 546,044 543,280
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization......... 254,594 239,443
-------- --------
Property and equipment--net........................ 291,450 303,837
Other assets............................................. 14,960 15,976
-------- --------
Total assets............................................. $361,650 $372,194
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
-------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable....................................... $ 9,391 $ 17,805
Due to CBOT/Eurex Alliance............................. 5,481 8,939
Funds held for deposit and membership transfers........ 1,511 4,653
Note payable........................................... 7,716 9,282
Current portion of long-term debt...................... 13,822 18,014
Deferred revenue....................................... 4,581 155
Other current liabilities.............................. 26,509 17,682
-------- --------
Total current liabilities.......................... 69,011 76,530
Long-term liabilities:
Deferred income taxes.................................. 25,118 28,572
Long-term debt......................................... 59,976 64,286
Other liabilities...................................... 9,489 11,486
-------- --------
Total long-term liabilities........................ 94,583 104,344
-------- --------
Total liabilities.................................. 163,594 180,874
Members' equity:
Members' equity........................................ 198,112 191,320
Accumulated other comprehensive loss................... (56) --
-------- --------
Total members' equity.............................. 198,056 191,320
-------- --------
Total liabilities and members' equity.................... $361,650 $372,194
======== ========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
A-20
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited) (in thousands)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
------------------
2001 2000
-------- --------
Revenues:
Exchange fees............................................ $ 63,316 $ 54,454
Market data.............................................. 32,102 29,330
Building................................................. 12,589 12,717
Services................................................. 6,401 9,638
Dues..................................................... 4,614 917
Other.................................................... 550 684
-------- --------
Total revenues......................................... 119,572 107,740
Expenses:
Salaries and benefits.................................... 29,845 30,723
Depreciation and amortization............................ 21,984 18,181
Professional services.................................... 10,039 14,491
General and administrative expenses...................... 28,691 21,802
Building operating costs................................. 11,738 12,135
Programs................................................. 931 1,578
Other.................................................... 2,000 8,330
-------- --------
Total expenses......................................... 105,228 107,240
-------- --------
Income from operations..................................... 14,344 500
Interest income.......................................... 589 671
Interest expense......................................... 3,359 2,721
-------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle............................ 11,574 (1,550)
Provision for income taxes:
Current.................................................. 8,381 4,517
Deferred................................................. (3,454) (3,111)
-------- --------
Total provision for income taxes....................... 4,927 1,406
-------- --------
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle...................................... 6,647 (2,956)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle--net of
tax....................................................... 51 --
-------- --------
Net income (loss)........................................ $ 6,596 $ (2,956)
======== ========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
A-21
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS' EQUITY
(Unaudited) (in thousands)
Accumulated
Other
Members' Comprehensive
Equity Loss Total
-------- ------------- --------
Balance--December 31, 1999................... $200,974 $200,974
Comprehensive income:
Net loss................................... (2,956) (2,956)
--------
Total comprehensive loss................... (2,956)
Capital contributions........................ 174 174
-------- --------
Balance--June 30, 2000....................... $198,192 $198,192
======== ========
Balance--December 31, 2000................... $191,320 $ -- $191,320
Comprehensive income:
Net income................................. 6,596 6,596
Transition adjustment for adoption of new
accounting pronouncement.................. 462
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange forward
contracts................................. (1,731)
Reclass of foreign exchange forward
contract loss............................. 1,176
Tax effect................................. 37
------
Total accumulated other comprehensive
loss.................................... (56) (56)
--------
Total comprehensive income............... 6,540
Capital contributions........................ 196 196
-------- ------ --------
Balance--June 30, 2001....................... $198,112 $ (56) $198,056
======== ====== ========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
A-22
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited) (in thousands)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
------------------
2001 2000
-------- --------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)........................................ $ 6,596 $ (2,956)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows
from operating activities:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.... 87 --
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 21,984 18,181
Loss on disposition of property and equipment.......... 1,346 371
Deferred income taxes.................................. (3,454) (3,111)
Changes in assets and liabilities...................... (3,809) 6,369
-------- --------
Net cash flows from operating activities............... 22,750 18,854
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment.................... (9,720) (15,847)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment............. 68 107
Investment in CBOT/Eurex Alliance........................ -- (500)
-------- --------
Net cash flows used in investing activities............ (9,652) (16,240)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of private placement senior notes................ (10,714) --
Payment of 1997 revolving credit agreement............... (7,300) (6,500)
Proceeds from secured note payable....................... 10,000 --
Payment of secured note payable.......................... (489) --
Additions to note payable................................ 8,675 --
Payment of note payable.................................. (10,179) --
Capital contributions from members....................... 196 174
-------- --------
Net cash flows used in financing activities............ (9,811) (6,326)
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents....... 3,287 (3,712)
Cash and cash equivalents--Beginning of period............. 28,205 22,449
-------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents--End of period................... $ 31,492 $ 18,737
======== ========
Cash paid for:
Interest................................................. $ 3,310 $ 3,365
======== ========
Taxes.................................................... $ 6,500 $ --
======== ========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
A-23
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Summary of significant accounting policies
Basis of presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of
the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiaries,
and its controlled subsidiary, Ceres Trading Limited Partnership ("Ceres")
(collectively, the "CBOT") have been prepared in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 28 and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The condensed consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the CBOT. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the
necessary disclosures required for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of the CBOT's management, the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the CBOT's
financial position as of June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000 and its results of
operations and cash flows for the six month interim periods ended June 30, 2001
and 2000. Interim period operating results may not be indicative of the
operating results for a full year. This information should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and for each year in the three year
period ended December 31, 2000.
For a summary of significant accounting policies (which have not
significantly changed from December 31, 2000) and additional information, see
note 1 to the audited December 31, 2000 consolidated financial statements.
Adoption of accounting pronouncements
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended and interpreted,
requires recognition of all derivative instruments in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition as either assets or liabilities and the
measurement of those instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 133 also requires
changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments to be recorded each
period in current earnings or other comprehensive income depending on the
intended use of the derivatives. If the derivative is designated in a fair-
value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged
item will be recognized in earnings. If the derivative is designated in a cash-
flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative will be recorded in
other comprehensive income and will be recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Income when the hedged item affects earnings. SFAS No. 133
defines new requirements for designation and documentation of hedging
relationships as well as ongoing effectiveness assessments in order to use
hedge accounting. For a derivative that does not qualify as a hedge, changes in
fair value will be recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 133 was adopted by the CBOT
on January 1, 2001. The CBOT recorded approximately $100,000 as a cumulative
transition adjustment to earnings relating to derivatives not designated as
hedges prior to adoption of SFAS No. 133 and to derivatives designated in fair-
value type hedges prior to adopting SFAS No. 133, and approximately $500,000 in
other comprehensive income as a cumulative transition adjustment for
derivatives designated in cash-flow type hedges prior to adopting SFAS No. 133.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS
No. 141, "Business Combinations", which established accounting and reporting
standards for business combinations. All business
A-24
combinations in the scope of this statement are to be accounted for using the
purchase method. The CBOT believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 141 will not
have an impact on the CBOT's financial position or results of operations.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets", which established accounting and reporting standards for acquired
goodwill and other intangible assets. SFAS No. 142 addresses how intangible
assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets (but not
those acquired in a business combination) should be accounted for in financial
statements upon their acquisition. SFAS No. 142 also addresses how goodwill and
other intangible assets should be accounted for after they have been initially
recognized in the financial statements. The CBOT has not yet completed its
analysis of the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 142 will have on
its financial position or results of operations.
Use of estimates
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
hereafter referred to as "generally accepted accounting principles," requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
2. Debt
Debt at June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
-------- ------------
Private placement senior notes, due in 2007, at
annual interest rate of 6.81%..................... $64,287 $75,000
Secured revolving credit agreement, due in 2001, at
an annual interest rate based on LIBOR (6.6875% at
December 31, 2000), plus .625%.................... -- 7,300
Secured note payable, due in 2004, at annual
interest rate of 8.25%............................ 9,511 --
------- -------
Total............................................ 73,798 82,300
Less current portion............................... 13,822 18,014
------- -------
Total............................................ $59,976 $64,286
======= =======
In March 2001, the CBOT entered into a secured note payable, under which the
CBOT borrowed $10.0 million. The note payable is secured by certain assets of
the CBOT. The CBOT used the proceeds to retire the secured revolving credit
agreement in the amount of $7.3 million.
Ceres has agreed to reimburse Deutsche Borse AG and the Swiss Stock Exchange
(collectively "Eurex") approximately $18.4 million (20.2 million euros) for
certain software modifications for the a/c/e system. As of June 30, 2001,
approximately $8.0 million (9.0 million euros) of this amount remains in note
payable in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, and is
due at various dates through 2002.
3. Commitments
The CBOT and CBOT/Eurex Alliance have commitments remaining with Deutsche
Borse Systems and Deutsche Borse AG for approximately $49.9 million (58.0
million euros) as of June 30, 2001 according to the
A-25
current price schedule, to fund the operations of the a/c/e system. These
payments are due at various times through June 2003 as follows in their
approximate U.S. dollar equivalent as of June 30, 2001 (in thousands):
2001............................. $13,977
2002............................. 25,365
2003............................. 10,535
4. Appreciation Rights
On February 20, 2001, the CBOT entered into an employment agreement with its
President and Chief Executive Officer (the "Executive"). Under the agreement,
the Executive was granted a right to receive a benefit from the appreciation in
the value of the CBOT's memberships through appreciation units. The memberships
and their related appreciation rights are as follows:
Class of Number of Grant
Membership Appreciation Appreciation Value
Equivalent Unit Units Per Unit
---------- ------------ ------------ --------
1 Full Membership..................... A-1A 25 $400,000
1 Full Membership..................... A-1B 10 600,000
1 Associate Membership................ A-2 10 80,000
1 IDEM Membership..................... A-4 5 10,000
1 COM Membership...................... A-5 5 20,000
Each appreciation unit represents the right to receive the excess of the
fair market value of the covered equity over the grant value of each
appreciation unit on the date of which such appreciation unit is exercised. The
fair market value is to be determined by computing the average sale price of
the covered equity over the prior ninety calendar days to the day of exercise.
The units vest over a four year-year period, with 40% vesting one year after
the grant date and 20% vesting on the same date in each year of the following
three years.
The CBOT is accounting for the appreciation rights in a manner similar to
stock appreciation rights in accordance with SFAS Interpretation No. 28,
"Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or
Award Plans" (An interpretation of APB Opinion Nos. 15 and 25). For the six
months ended June 30, 2001, there was no measured compensation expense relating
to the appreciation rights.
5. Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
At June 30, 2001, the CBOT had foreign exchange forward contracts with a
financial institution to hedge its risk of foreign currency fluctuations
related to certain liabilities and commitments in euros with Eurex and related
entities.
Foreign exchange forward contracts identified to liabilities and commitments
as cash flow type hedges had notional amounts approximating $6.5 million (7.6
million euros) at June 30, 2001. A loss of approximately $93,000 was recorded
to accrued liabilities and other comprehensive loss for these hedging
commitments at June 30, 2001.
6. Litigation and Settlement
The CBOT has been named as a defendant in various lawsuits. Although the
ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be presently determined, the CBOT
established an accrual for legal liabilities of $3.0 million during the first
quarter of 2001.
A-26
7. Subsequent Events
On July 2, 2001, the CBOT entered into foreign exchange forward contracts
with a financial institution to hedge certain risk of foreign currency
fluctuations related to recorded liabilities in euros to Eurex and related
entities. The notional amount of these contracts total about $7.6 million (9.0
million euros) with exchange rates ranging from .8475 to .8485 and maturities
at various dates through December, 2001 which correspond to the terms of the
liabilities.
On July 31, 2001, the CBOT entered into foreign exchange forward contracts
with a financial institution to hedge certain risk of foreign currency
fluctuations related to certain commitments in euros to Eurex and related
entities. The notional amount of these contracts total about $2.6 million (3.0
million euros) with exchange rates ranging from .8742 to .8758 and maturities
at various dates through December, 2001 which correspond to the terms of the
commitments.
On September 10, 2001, the CBOT entered into foreign exchange forward
contracts with a financial institution to hedge certain risk of foreign
currency fluctuations related to certain commitments in euros to Eurex and
related entities. The notional amount of these contracts total about $10.0
million (11.1 million euros) with exchange rates ranging from .8974 to .8986
and maturities at various dates through June, 2002 which correspond to the
terms of the commitments.
On September 26, 2001, the CBOT entered into an agreement with a bank to
provide a $20 million revolving line of credit (the "Revolver".) The agreement
has a maturity date of one year from the closing. Interest related to the
Revolver is payable at the lower of LIBOR plus 2.75% or the prime rate. The
provisions of the agreement contain various covenants which require that the
CBOT maintain specific equity levels and financial ratios.
In October, the CBOT became a minority interest holder in a joint venture
formed by Chicago Board Options Exchange and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
The joint venture is a for-profit company that is intending to facilitate the
electronic trading of single stock-futures. Pursuant to the joint venture
agreement, the CBOT is obligated to make specified capital contributions to the
joint venture. In October, 2001, the CBOT made a capital contribution of
approximately $300,000. The maximum future amount the CBOT could be required to
contribute to the joint venture is approximately $650,000.
A-27
APPENDIX B
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
OF BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Introduction............................................................... B-2
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of June 30,
2001...................................................................... B-3
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the Six Months Ended June
30, 2001.................................................................. B-4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the Year Ended December 31,
2000...................................................................... B-5
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Members' Equity for the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2001....................................................... B-6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements....................... B-7
B-1
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements give effect to (i) the issuance of 39,802,650 shares of common
stock, in connection with the proposed demutualization as described elsewhere
in this document and (ii) the proposed acquisition of the Class A and Class B
limited partners' interest in Ceres Trading Limited Partnership by the
borrowing of $20 million to fund a payment of $22,860,000 in exchange for such
interests, as if they had occurred as of June 30, 2001, for purposes of the
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of financial condition,
and as of the beginning of the six month period ended June 30, 2001 and the
beginning of the year ended December 31, 2000 for purposes of the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated statements of income.
The unaudited pro forma information reflects the acquisition of the limited
partners' interest in Ceres Trading Limited Partnership through the payment of
$22,860,000, which represents the value of the limited partners' interest as of
June 30, 2001. This acquisition will be effected through the purchase of the
limited partner interests of Ceres Trading Limited Partnership at the fair
value on the date of the transaction. As there are no material changes expected
in the operations and business of the Ceres Trading Limited Partnership,
management believes that the fair value of the Ceres Trading Limited
Partnership will not change significantly before the date of completion of the
restructuring transactions. Ceres Trading Limited Partnership will be
liquidated after the proposed transaction has been completed. As of June 30,
2001, there were 3,619 Class A limited partnership units and 60 Class B limited
partnership units outstanding in Ceres Trading Limited Partnership. As of that
date, the CBOT held 16 Class A limited partnership units representing 0.5% of
the outstanding units of that class.
The number of shares used in the calculation of net income (loss) per share
is based on the shares to be issued to the members and are assumed to be
outstanding from the beginning of the period.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements are
based on available information and on assumptions management believes are
reasonable and that reflect the effects of the transactions described above.
These unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements are
provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed to be
indicative of the CBOT's consolidated financial position or results of
operations had these transactions been consummated on the dates assumed and do
not in any way represent a projection or forecast of the CBOT's consolidated
financial position or results of operations for any future date or period. The
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the CBOT,
together with the related notes and report of independent auditors, and with
the information set forth under our "Capitalization," "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Our
Business".
B-2
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
June 30, 2001
(in thousands)
Pro Forma After
-----------------------
Issuance of Acquisition
Common of Interest
ASSETS Actual Stock in Ceres
------ -------- ----------- -----------
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Unrestricted................................. $ 29,072 $ 29,072 $ 26,212
Held under deposit and membership transfers.. 1,511 1,511 1,511
Restricted................................... 909 909 909
-------- -------- --------
Total cash and cash equivalents............ 31,492 31,492 28,632
Accounts receivable............................ 21,787 21,787 21,787
Prepaid expenses............................... 1,961 1,961 1,961
-------- -------- --------
Total current assets....................... 55,240 55,240 52,380
-------- -------- --------
Property and equipment
Land........................................... 34,234 34,234 34,234
Buildings and equipment........................ 306,520 306,520 306,520
Furnishings and fixtures....................... 148,625 148,625 148,625
Computer software and systems.................. 56,665 56,665 56,665
-------- -------- --------
Total property and equipment............... 546,044 546,044 546,044
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization. 254,594 254,594 254,594
-------- -------- --------
Property and equipment--net................ 291,450 291,450 291,450
Other assets..................................... 14,960 14,960 14,960
-------- -------- --------
Total assets............................... $361,650 $361,650 $358,790
======== ======== ========
LIABILITIES, MEMBERS' EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
----------------------------------------------
Current liabilities
Accounts payable............................... $ 9,391 $ 9,391 $ 9,391
Funds held for deposit and membership
transfers..................................... 1,511 1,511 1,511
Note payable................................... 7,716 7,716 7,716
Current portion of long-term debt.............. 13,822 13,822 13,822
Due to CBOT/Eurex Alliance..................... 5,481 5,481 5,481
Deferred revenue............................... 4,581 4,581 4,581
Other current liabilities...................... 26,509 26,509 26,509
-------- -------- --------
Total current liabilities.................. 69,011 69,011 69,011
-------- -------- --------
Deferred income taxes............................ 25,118 25,118 25,118
Long-term debt................................... 59,976 59,976 79,976
Other liabilities................................ 9,489 9,489 9,489
-------- -------- --------
Total long-term liabilities................ 94,583 94,583 114,583
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities.......................... 163,594 163,594 183,594
Members' equity.................................. 198,112 -- --
Preferred stock.................................. -- -- --
Common stock..................................... -- 40 40
Additional paid-in capital....................... -- 198,072 175,212
Accumulated other comprehensive loss............. (56) (56) (56)
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities, members' equity and
stockholders' equity...................... $361,650 $361,650 $358,790
======== ======== ========
The accompanying introduction and notes are an integral part of this Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
B-3
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2001
(in thousands, except per share data)
Pro Forma After
----------------------
Issuance Acquisition
of Common of Interest
Actual Stock in Ceres
-------- --------- -----------
Revenues:
Exchange fees................................ $ 63,316 $ 63,316 $ 63,316
Market data.................................. 32,102 32,102 32,102
Building..................................... 12,589 12,589 12,589
Services..................................... 6,401 6,401 6,401
Dues......................................... 4,614 4,614 4,614
Other........................................ 550 550 550
-------- -------- --------
Total revenue.............................. 119,572 119,572 119,572
-------- -------- --------
Expenses:
Salaries and benefits........................ 29,845 29,845 29,845
Depreciation and amortization................ 21,984 21,984 21,984
Professional services........................ 10,039 10,039 10,039
General and administrative expenses.......... 28,691 28,691 28,691
Building operating costs..................... 11,738 11,738 11,738
Programs..................................... 931 931 931
Other........................................ 2,000 2,000 2,000
-------- -------- --------
Total expenses............................. 105,228 105,228 105,228
-------- -------- --------
Income from operations......................... 14,344 14,344 14,344
Interest income.............................. 589 589 589
Interest expense............................. 3,359 3,359 3,359
-------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle...... 11,574 11,574 11,574
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Current...................................... 8,381 8,381 8,381
Deferred..................................... (3,454) (3,454) (3,454)
-------- -------- --------
Total provision for income taxes........... 4,927 4,927 4,927
-------- -------- --------
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle.......................... 6,647 6,647 6,647
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, net of tax......................... 51 51 51
-------- -------- --------
Net income..................................... $ 6,596 $ 6,596 $ 6,596
======== ======== ========
Net income per share........................... $ 0.17
========
Shares used in the calculation of net income
per share..................................... 39,803
========
The accompanying introduction and notes are an integral part of this Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
B-4
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
(in thousands, except per share data)
Pro Forma After
----------------------
Issuance Acquisition
of Common of Interest
Actual Stock in Ceres
-------- --------- -----------
Revenues:
Exchange fees................................ $101,981 $101,981 $101,981
Quotations................................... 61,060 61,060 61,060
Building..................................... 24,530 24,530 24,530
Services..................................... 17,848 17,848 17,848
Dues......................................... 5,484 5,484 5,484
Other........................................ 2,016 2,016 2,016
-------- -------- --------
Total revenues............................. 212,919 212,919 212,919
-------- -------- --------
Expenses:
Salaries and benefits........................ 56,391 56,391 56,391
Depreciation and amortization................ 40,013 40,013 40,013
Professional services........................ 32,459 32,459 32,459
General and administrative expenses.......... 52,299 52,299 52,299
Building operating costs..................... 22,584 22,584 22,584
Programs..................................... 3,539 3,539 3,539
Other........................................ 8,261 8,261 8,261
-------- -------- --------
Total expenses............................. 215,546 215,546 215,546
-------- -------- --------
Loss from operations........................... (2,627) (2,627) (2,627)
Interest income.............................. 1,242 1,242 1,242
Interest expense............................. 6,773 6,773 6,773
-------- -------- --------
Loss before income taxes....................... (8,158) (8,158) (8,158)
Provision for income taxes
Current...................................... 133 133 133
Deferred..................................... 1,817 1,817 1,817
-------- -------- --------
Total provision for income taxes........... 1,950 1,950 1,950
-------- -------- --------
Net loss....................................... $(10,108) $(10,108) $(10,108)
======== ======== ========
Net loss per share............................. $ (0.25)
========
Shares used in the calculation of net loss per
share......................................... 39,803
========
The accompanying introduction and notes are an integral part of this Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
B-5
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF MEMBERS' EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2001
(in thousands)
Pro Forma After
-----------------------
Issuance of Acquisition
Common of Interest
Actual Stock in Ceres
-------- ----------- -----------
Members' Equity:
Members' equity............................ $198,112 $ -- $ --
Accumulated other comprehensive loss....... (56) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Total members' equity.................... $198,056 $ -- $ --
======== ======== ========
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, 10,000,000 authorized,
none issued and outstanding............... $ -- $ -- $ --
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000
shares authorized, 39,802,650 shares
issued and outstanding.................... -- 40 40
Additional paid-in capital................. -- 198,072 175,212
Accumulated other comprehensive loss....... -- (56) (56)
-------- -------- --------
Total stockholders' equity............... $ -- $198,056 $175,196
======== ======== ========
B-6
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PROFORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Unaudited Proforma Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition reflects such adjustments as necessary, in the opinion of management,
to reflect the conversion of members' equity to common stock of CBOT Holdings
and payment of $22,860,000 to the limited partners of Ceres in exchange for
their limited partnership interests based on the June 30, 2001 valuation of
Ceres. The actual payment to be made to the limited partners of Ceres will be
based on the final valuation report of Arthur Andersen relating to the
valuation of Ceres as of a date reasonably proximate to the date of the
completion of the Ceres merger.
The CBOT has estimated $14,300,000 for expenses to be incurrred in
connection with the restructuring transactions. For the six months ended June
30, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, the CBOT has recognized
$1,831,000 and $9,857,000, respectively, of these expenses in the Unaudited
Proforma Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The balance of the
estimated expenses to be incurred in connection with the restructuring
transactions is expected to be expended in the second half of 2001 and early
2002.
Net income (loss) per share for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and the
year ended December 31, 2000 is calculated as follows (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
June 30, December 31,
2001 2000
-------- ------------
Net income (loss)..................................... $6,596 $(10,108)
====== ========
Weighted average shares outstanding................... 39,803 39,803
====== ========
Net income (loss) per common share.................... $ 0.17 $ (0.25)
====== ========
B-7
APPENDIX C
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Agreement") is made and entered
into as of , 2001, by and among the Board of Trade of the City of
Chicago, Inc., a Delaware nonstock, not-for-profit corporation ("CBOT"), CBOT
Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware non-stock, for-profit corporation ("Merger Sub")
and wholly-owned subsidiary of CBOT Holdings, Inc. ("CBOT Holdings") and CBOT
Holdings, CBOT, Merger Sub and CBOT Holdings are referred to collectively
herein as the "Parties." Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meaning assigned to them in the CBOT's Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws, which
includes the CBOT's Rules and Regulations (collectively, the "CBOT Organization
Documents"), in each case, as may be amended from time to time prior to the
Effective Time (as hereinafter defined) in accordance with the terms of the
CBOT Organization Documents and applicable law.
WHEREAS, CBOT is pursuing a strategic restructuring involving, among other
things, (A) the demutualization of CBOT by creating CBOT Holdings as a stock,
for-profit holding company, (B) the modernization of CBOT's corporate
governance structure and (C) the reorganization and consolidation of CBOT's
electronic trading business (collectively, the "Restructuring Transactions");
WHEREAS, as part of, and in order to effectuate, the Restructuring
Transactions, Merger Sub will merge with and into CBOT pursuant to this
Agreement, with CBOT surviving and becoming a subsidiary of CBOT Holdings (the
"Merger");
WHEREAS, at the effective time of, and in connection with, the Merger, the
members of the CBOT will receive a dividend of the common stock of CBOT
Holdings;
WHEREAS, the boards of directors of CBOT and Merger Sub have each determined
that this Agreement and the Merger are advisable and approved, adopted and
authorized the Merger, this Agreement and their respective performance of their
obligations hereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises
herein made, and in consideration of the representations, warranties, and
covenants herein contained, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
expressly acknowledged and agreed, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
BASIC TRANSACTION
A. The Merger.
(1) General. On the terms and subject to the conditions of this Agreement,
Merger Sub shall merge with and into CBOT (as of the Effective Time (as defined
below)), with CBOT as the surviving entity (sometimes referred to herein as the
"Surviving Corporation"), and CBOT shall file a certificate of merger (the
"Certificate of Merger") with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
and make all other filings or recordings required by Delaware law in order to
effectuate the Merger. The Merger shall become effective at such time as CBOT
files the Certificate of Merger or as is otherwise specified in the Certificate
of Merger (the "Effective Time"). The Surviving Corporation may, at any time
after the Effective Time, take any action (including executing and delivering
any document) in the name of and on behalf of Merger Sub, CBOT or the members
of the CBOT immediately prior to the Effective Time that the Surviving
Corporation, in its sole and conclusive discretion, deems necessary or
advisable in order to effect the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
C-1
(2) Surviving Entity. At the Effective Time, Merger Sub shall be merged with
and into CBOT, whereupon the separate existence of the Merger Sub shall cease,
and CBOT shall be the surviving entity of the Merger in accordance with Section
255 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
(3) Closing. The closing of the Merger (the "Closing") shall take place at
the offices of Kirkland & Ellis, 200 East Randolph Drive, Chicago, Illinois,
60601, or at such other place, date and time as CBOT may determine (the
"Closing Time"), which time shall be on or after the time at which all
conditions to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby are satisfied or
waived by CBOT.
(4) Certificate of Incorporation; Bylaws; Rules and Regulations; Name. From
and after the Effective Time, and until thereafter amended in accordance with
applicable law, the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation attached
hereto as Exhibit A shall be the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation (the "Surviving Charter"). From and
after the Effective Time, and until thereafter amended in accordance with
applicable law, the Bylaws attached hereto as Exhibit B shall be the Bylaws of
the Surviving Corporation (the "Surviving Bylaws"). From and after the
Effective Time, and until thereafter amended in accordance with applicable law,
the Rules and Regulations attached hereto as Exhibit C shall be the Rules and
Regulations of the Surviving Corporation (the "Surviving Rules and Regulations"
and together with the Surviving Charter and Surviving Bylaws, the "Surviving
Organization Documents").
(5) Name. The name of the Surviving Corporation shall remain "Board of Trade
of the City of Chicago, Inc."
(6) Directors and Officers. At the Effective Time, the directors and
officers of CBOT in office immediately prior to the Effective Time shall become
the directors and officers of the Surviving Corporation and shall, in such
capacity, retain their respective positions and terms of office and tenures
held thereby immediately prior to the Effective Time.
B. Conversion and Exchange of Memberships. At the Effective Time, by virtue
of the Merger and without any action on the part of CBOT, CBOT Holdings, Merger
Sub, or any other Person:
(1) Each CBOT Full Membership issued and outstanding as of immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall be converted into and exchanged for the right to
receive one (1) Series B-1, Class B membership and one (1) Class C membership
in the Surviving Corporation with such rights, privileges and obligations as
set forth in the Surviving Organization Documents..
(2) Each CBOT Associate Membership issued and outstanding as of immediately
prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into and exchanged for the right
to receive one (1) Series B-2, Class B membership in the Surviving Corporation
with such rights, privileges and obligations as set forth in the Surviving
Organization Documents.
(3) Each CBOT GIM Membership issued and outstanding as of immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall be converted into and exchanged for the right to
receive one (1) Series B-3, Class B membership in the Surviving Corporation
with such rights, privileges and obligations as set forth in the Surviving
Organization Documents.
(4) Each CBOT IDEM Membership issued and outstanding as of immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall be converted into and exchanged for the right to
receive one (1) Series B-4, Class B membership in the Surviving Corporation
with such rights, privileges and obligations as set forth in the Surviving
Organization Documents.
(5) Each CBOT COM Membership issued and outstanding as of immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall be converted into and exchanged for the right to
receive one (1) Series B-5, Class B membership in the Surviving Corporation
with such rights, privileges and obligations as set forth in the Surviving
Organization Documents.
C-2
(6) The sole membership in Merger Sub shall be converted into and exchanged
for one (1) Class A membership in the Surviving Corporation with such rights,
privileges and obligations as set forth in the Surviving Organization
Documents.
Accordingly, from and after the Effective Time, the holders of record of (i)
CBOT Full Memberships immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be deemed
to be the holders of Series B-1, Class B memberships and Class C memberships in
the Surviving Corporation for and into which such CBOT Full Memberships are
exchanged and converted, (ii) CBOT Associate Memberships immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall be deemed to be the holders of Series B-2, Class B
memberships in the Surviving Corporation for and into which such CBOT Associate
Memberships are exchanged and converted, (iii) CBOT GIM Memberships immediately
prior to the Effective Time shall be deemed to be the holders of Series B-3,
Class B memberships in the Surviving Corporation for and into which such CBOT
GIM Memberships are exchanged, (iv) CBOT IDEM Memberships immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall be deemed to be the holders of Series B-4, Class B
memberships in the Surviving Corporation for and into which such CBOT IDEM
Memberships are exchanged and converted, and (v) CBOT COM Memberships
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be deemed to be the holders of
Series B-5, Class B memberships in the Surviving Corporation for and into which
such CBOT COM Memberships are exchanged and converted, in each case, pursuant
to the provisions of this Article I.B.
C. Closing of Transfer Records. From and after the Effective Time, transfers
of CBOT Full Memberships, Associate Memberships, GIM Memberships, IDEM
Memberships and COM Memberships outstanding prior to the Effective Time shall
not be made on the books and records of the Surviving Corporation or otherwise.
ARTICLE II
CONDITIONS TO CLOSE
The obligation of the Parties to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby is subject to (a) the approval and adoption of this Agreement and the
Merger contemplated hereby, pursuant to a combined proxy statement and
prospectus, dated , 2001, contained in that certain Registration
Statement on Form S-4, Registration No. 333-54370, actually filed by CBOT
Holding relating to the Restructuring Transactions (as amended, the
"Registration Statement"), and (b) satisfaction or waiver of all other
conditions to CBOT's obligation to complete the Restructuring Transactions as
described in the Registration Statement.
ARTICLE III
TERMINATION
A. Termination of Agreement. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable
law, CBOT may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, terminate this Agreement
at any time prior to the Effective Time.
B. Effect of Termination. If CBOT terminates this Agreement pursuant to
Article III, A. above, all rights and obligations of the Parties shall
terminate without any liability of any Party or Person to any other Party or
Person.
ARTICLE IV
MISCELLANEOUS
A. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall not confer any rights
or remedies upon any person or entity other than the Parties and their
respective successors and permitted assigns.
C-3
B. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between
the Parties and supersedes any prior understandings, agreements, or
representations by or between the Parties, written or oral, to the extent they
related in any way to the subject matter hereof.
C. Succession and Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the Parties named herein and their respective successors and
permitted assigns. No Party may assign either this Agreement or any of its
rights, interests, or obligations hereunder without the prior written approval
of the other Parties.
D. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts
(including by means of telecopied signatures), each of which shall be deemed an
original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
E. Headings. The section headings contained in this Agreement are inserted
for convenience only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
F. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the domestic laws of the State of Delaware without giving
effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State
of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the
laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware.
G. Amendments and Waivers. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable
law, the Parties may mutually amend any provision of this Agreement at any time
prior to the Effective Time with the prior authorization of their respective
boards of directors. No amendment of any provision of this Agreement shall be
valid unless the same shall be in writing and signed by all of the Parties.
H. Severability. Any term or provision of this Agreement that is invalid or
unenforceable in any situation in any jurisdiction shall not affect the
validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or the
validity or enforceability of the offending term or provision in any other
situation or in any other jurisdiction.
I. Construction. Any reference to any federal, state, local, or foreign
statute or law shall be deemed also to refer to all rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder, unless the context otherwise requires. The term
"including" shall mean "including without limitation" and all variants shall
have similarly inclusive, but not limiting, meanings.
J. Further Assurances. From time to time, as and when requested by either
Party hereto, the other Party shall execute and deliver, or cause to be
executed and delivered, all such documents and instruments and shall take, or
cause to be taken, all such further or other actions, which documents,
instruments or actions are consistent with, and customary and necessary for,
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
* * * *
C-4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the date first written above.
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF
CHICAGO, INC.
By:
Name:
Title:
CBOT MERGER SUB, INC.
By:
Name:
Title:
CBOT HOLDINGS, INC.
By:
Name:
Title:
C-5
APPENDIX D-1
FAIRNESS OPINION OF WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, L.L.C.
September 24, 2001
The Independent Allocation Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
The Board of Directors of the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
141 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
Gentlemen:
We understand that the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., a
Delaware nonstock, not-for-profit corporation (the "CBOT") intends to implement
a series of restructuring transactions, which are designed to restructure and
demutualize the CBOT. In connection with the initial proposal for such
restructuring and demutualization ("Initial Restructuring Proposal"), you
previously requested, and we delivered, our opinion dated May 5, 2000 (the "May
5 Opinion") as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
allocation of ownership described below (the "Allocation") among the members
and holders of membership interests (the "Members") of the CBOT with respect to
their respective memberships (the "Memberships").
In August 2000, the Initial Restructuring Proposal was substantially revised
(the "Revised Restructuring Proposal"). At your request, we updated our May 5
Opinion on November 21, 2000 and January 16, 2001 (the "January 16 Opinion"),
in light of the Revised Restructuring Proposal. You have now advised us that
you have further modified and amended the Revised Restructuring Proposal and
that you currently intend to restructure and demutualize the CBOT by (i)
creating a Delaware stock, for-profit holding company ("CBOT Holdings") that
will own the Class A membership (described below) in a Delaware for-profit, non
stock successor of the CBOT (the "CBOT Subsidiary") and (ii) distributing
shares of CBOT Holdings to those members of the CBOT who were members
immediately prior to completing such transactions (collectively the
"Restructuring Transactions"). In connection with the Restructuring
Transactions, you have now requested that we update the January 16 Opinion.
More specifically, we understand that, as part of the Restructuring
Transactions, the CBOT will declare and pay a dividend of common stock of CBOT
Holdings to each Member. The common stock of CBOT Holdings will consist of a
single class (not divided into series) with customary voting, liquidation and
dividend rights, which, immediately following completion of the Restructuring
Transactions, will represent all of the equity value and equity voting power of
CBOT Holdings. Shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings will be issued to each
member in accordance with the Allocation ratio in respect of his or her
Membership. In addition, we understand that the CBOT will become a Delaware
nonstock, for-profit corporation and a subsidiary of CBOT Holdings, and issue
new Class A, Class B and Class C memberships. The sole Class A membership in
the CBOT Subsidiary will be held by CBOT Holdings and will entitle CBOT
Holdings to (a) receive all distributions, dividends and proceeds upon
liquidation from the CBOT Subsidiary, and (b) the exclusive right to vote on
most matters requiring a vote of the members of the CBOT subsidiary. Each
Member of the CBOT will receive one of the five series of Class B memberships
in the CBOT Subsidiary in respect of each Membership held by such Member (i.e.,
each Full Member, Associate Member, GIM, IDEM and COM will receive one Series
B-1, Series B-2, Series B-3, Series B-4 and Series B-5, Class B membership in
the CBOT subsidiary, respectively). Each Class B membership will, subject to
satisfaction of applicable membership and eligibility requirements, entitle the
holder to trading rights and privileges that correspond to such holder's
current class of membership in the CBOT. In addition, each Full Member will
receive one Class C membership in the CBOT Subsidiary, which, subject to
satisfaction of certain requirements, will entitle the holder to become a
member of the Chicago Board Options Exchange Incorporated (the "CBOE") at no
additional cost. The holders of Class B and Class C memberships will generally
not have voting rights with respect to matters requiring a vote of the members
of the CBOT Subsidiary, except that holders of Series B-1 and Series of B-2,
Class B memberships
D-1-1
will have voting rights to approve changes that would adversely affect certain
core rights relating to the trading rights and privileges of Class B
memberships.
We understand that, as a result of the completion of the Restructuring
Transactions, the CBOT's electronic trading operations now conducted by the
Ceres Trading Limited Partnership ("Ceres") will be operated within a wholly-
owned subsidiary of the CBOT Subsidiary focused exclusively on electronic
trading (the "eCBOT"). Pursuant to this reorganization of the CBOT's electronic
trading operations, Ceres will be liquidated and limited partnership interests
in Ceres will be exchanged for cash payments. The fairness of the consideration
received by the limited partners of Ceres in exchange for their partnership
interests pursuant to the merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of the CBOT
Subsidiary with and into Ceres and the fairness of the consideration received
by the Members for their respective Memberships are beyond the scope of this
opinion, which addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the Allocation on a relative basis among the different classes of Members. We
have been advised by the Independent Allocation Committee of the Board of
Directors of the CBOT in reliance upon the advice of the Implementation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the CBOT that, for purposes of rendering
this opinion, we may assume that the Restructuring Transactions will not be
effected by means of a liquidation. Please note that we have made such
assumption and that we have made such assumption without independent legal
analysis.
In connection with our review of the Restructuring Transactions and the
preparation of our opinion herein, we have examined: (a) certain descriptive
information concerning the Restructuring Transactions; (b) the draft dated
September 17, 2001 of Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4
("Form S-4") of CBOT Holdings relating to the proposed issuance of shares of
common stock of CBOT Holdings; (c) the drafts dated September 17, 2001 of the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of CBOT Holdings;
(d) the drafts dated September 17, 2001 of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation and By-Laws of the for-profit CBOT Subsidiary; (e) various
CBOT documents including the Chicago Board of Trade rules and regulations; (f)
various trading and financial statistics for the CBOT; (g) certain publicly
available information regarding terms of certain transactions involving
restructurings of exchanges comparable to the CBOT and the allocation of value;
(h) presentations provided to the CBOT by consultants and financial and legal
advisors; (i) letters to the CBOT from various members regarding the
restructuring and demutualization of the CBOT; (j) information regarding the
historical trading prices of Memberships; and (k) certain other information
regarding the CBOT and its operations. We have also held discussions of the
foregoing with current and former members of the senior management of the CBOT
and of the various classes of Members, have considered other matters which we
have deemed relevant to our inquiry and have taken into account such accepted
financial and investment banking procedures and considerations as we have
deemed relevant.
Furthermore, in connection with our review of the Restructuring Transactions
and the preparation of our opinion herein, we have assumed that: (a) there will
not be any transaction (including any business combination) with the CBOE or
any other party; in this connection, we understand that prior discussions
between the CBOT and the CBOE of a possible business combination have
terminated; and (b) all existing trading rights and privileges of each
Membership class and the CBOE exercise right of Full Members will remain intact
following the Restructuring Transactions; in this connection, we note the
concerns raised by disclosures within the Form S-4 with respect to possible
future actions by the CBOE adverse to the CBOE exercise right, the effects of
which are beyond the scope of this opinion.
In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without independent
verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of all the information
examined by or otherwise reviewed or discussed with us for purposes of this
opinion. We have not made or obtained an independent valuation or appraisal of
the assets, liabilities or solvency of the CBOT. We were not requested to, and
did not, participate in the structuring of the Restructuring Transactions nor
were we asked to consider, and our opinion does not address, the relative
merits of the Restructuring Transactions as compared to any alternative
business strategies that might exist for the CBOT or the effect of any other
transaction in which the CBOT might engage. Our opinion herein is based upon
economic, market, financial and other conditions existing on, and other
information disclosed to us as of, the date of this letter. It should be
understood that, although subsequent developments may affect this opinion, we
D-1-2
do not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this opinion except as
provided in the letter agreement between William Blair & Company and the
Independent Allocation Committee dated September 7, 2001.
William Blair & Company has been engaged in the investment banking business
since 1935. We have acted as the investment banker to the Independent
Allocation Committee in connection with the Restructuring Transactions (and the
Initial Restructuring Proposal and the Revised Restructuring Proposal) and have
received fees from the CBOT for our services. In addition, the CBOT has agreed
to indemnify us against certain liabilities arising out of our engagement.
Our investment banking services and our opinion were provided for the use
and benefit of the Independent Allocation Committee of the Board of Directors
and the Board of Directors of the CBOT in connection with the Restructuring
Transactions. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, to the Members of the CBOT of the Allocation of shares of common stock of
CBOT Holdings in respect of their Memberships in connection with the
Restructuring Transactions, and we do not address the merits of the underlying
decision by the CBOT to engage in the Restructuring Transactions and this
opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any Member as to how such
Member should vote with respect to the Restructuring Transactions. It is
understood that this letter may not be disclosed or otherwise referred to
without prior written consent, except that the opinion may be included in its
entirety in a proxy statement and prospectus mailed to the Members by the CBOT
in connection with the Restructuring Transactions.
In arriving at our conclusion, we have considered various methodologies for
allocating the shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings. We have concluded that
an allocation methodology that takes into
account a combination of factors rather than a single factor is appropriate,
and that such combination of factors should include, with respect to each of
the five classes of Members: (a) relative liquidation rights; (b) relative
voting rights; (c) the allocation made in respect of each class of Membership
in connection with the formation of Ceres; (d) the market values of
Memberships; and (e) the contract volumes for which each class of Membership
has been responsible on a historical basis. In arriving at our conclusion, we
have attached greater importance to liquidation rights, voting rights and the
allocation made in respect of each Membership in connection with the formation
of Ceres.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that the
Allocation to Members of shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings in respect of
their Memberships in connection with the Restructuring Transactions in the
ratio of 5.0 : 1.0 : 0.5 : 0.06 : 0.07 to each Full, Associate, GIM, IDEM and
COM Membership, respectively, is fair, from a financial point of view to each
of the five classes of Members.
Very truly yours,
/S/ WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, L.L.C.
-------------------------------------
WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, L.L.C.
D-1-3
APPENDIX D-2
FAIRNESS OPINION OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Boards of Directors
Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
Electronic Chicago Board of Trade, Inc.
c/o
Ms. Carol A. Burke
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
141 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604
October 2, 2001
Ladies and Gentlemen:
You have asked us to advise you with respect to the fairness from a
financial point of view to the Ceres Trading Limited Partnership ("Ceres") and
each class of the limited partners of Ceres of the consideration to be received
by each limited partner of Ceres in exchange for their respective limited
partnership interest pursuant to the Transaction (as defined below). We
understand that Ceres is a Delaware limited partnership, having five classes of
limited partners: Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class B. We
also understand that the Electronic Board of Trade, Inc. ("eCBOT"), a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. (the
"CBOT"), is the general partner of Ceres.
We understand that the CBOT is to be restructured pursuant to a series of
transactions (collectively, the "Restructuring Transactions") that generally
involve (i) the demutualization of the CBOT by creating a Delaware stock, for-
profit holding company ("CBOT Holdings") and distributing shares of common
stock of CBOT Holdings to your members in respect of their memberships in the
CBOT; (ii) the modernization of the corporate governance mechanism of the CBOT;
and (iii) the reorganization and consolidation of the electronic trading
business of the CBOT, part of which is currently operated by Ceres, into eCBOT.
Upon completion of the Restructuring Transactions, we further understand that
the CBOT will become a nonstock for-profit membership corporation and a
subsidiary of CBOT Holdings.
We also understand that, as part of the reorganization of the electronic
trading business of the CBOT in connection with the Restructuring Transactions,
a newly formed corporate subsidiary of the CBOT subsidiary will merge with and
into Ceres, with Ceres as the surviving entity (the "Transaction"). As a result
of the Transaction, eCBOT will remain the general partner of Ceres and the CBOT
subsidiary will become a limited partner of Ceres. Following the Transaction,
Ceres will liquidate and its assets will be distributed to the CBOT subsidiary
and eCBOT pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of Ceres. Pursuant to the Transaction, each limited
partnership interest in Ceres (other than any limited partnership interests
then held by the CBOT subsidiary or any of its affiliates) will be exchanged
for a cash payment. The amount of the cash payment that will be distributed in
exchange for each limited partnership interest will be determined by the Boards
of Directors of the CBOT and eCBOT after considering that partnership
interest's allocable portion of the value of Ceres as presented in the
valuation report regarding the value of Ceres and the partnership interests in
Ceres, to be delivered as of a date reasonably proximate to the consummation of
the Transaction.
D-2-1
In connection with our analysis, you have furnished us with certain
documents and other information concerning the Ceres and the CBOT, as we
requested. We have performed such investigations and analyses as we considered
appropriate. Among other items we have considered, we have:
1) Read current and historical financial information including Ceres
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position year-to-date for the
period ended June 30, 2001 (unaudited), Ceres and CBOT Consolidated
Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 1999 and December
31, 2000 (audited), Ceres Consolidated Financial Statements for the
years ended December 31, 1992, 1993, 1994 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998
(audited), CBOT Annual Reports for the years ended December 31, 1995,
1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 including financial statements
(audited), Ceres monthly reports of revenues and expenses for each month
of fiscal year 2000 (unaudited) and January through June of 2001
(unaudited), Summary of Obligation and Payments to DBS Group for the
Eurex software as of October 31, 2000 (unaudited);
2) Read certain publicly available business and financial information
relating to Ceres and the CBOT including Press Releases and public
information extracted from CBOT's website;
3) Read certain internal financial and operating information provided by
management, including Member Trading Volume for various Quarters Ending
March 31, 1999 through March 31, 2001 and Trailing Five-Quarter Average
for Class B partners, Volume Report: CBOT Exchange Fees System, various
Ceres CTI Volume Report for Agriculture and Financials by firm number
sequence for year-to-date through June 30, 2001, Ceres Class B Units for
the year ended December 31, 2000, CBOT Class B Capital Balance Summary;
4) Held meetings and discussions with management and senior personnel to
discuss the business, operations, assets, historical financial results
and future prospects of the CBOT;
6) Considered the investment in technology made by Ceres for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and the interim through
June 30, 2001 to establish an electronic trading system;
7) Performed a discounted cash flow analysis of potential income generating
scenarios for Ceres based upon independent research and input from
management;
8) Read various agreements related to Ceres, the CBOT, a/c/e, and Eurex
from a financial point of view including the Ceres Trading Limited
Partnership Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
dated as of September 8, 1997, Amended and Restated CBOT/Ceres License
Agreement dated May 15, 1998, Electronic Trading Division Expense
Agreement for CBOT/Ceres dated May 29, 1998, Implementation Regulations
of Eurex Deutschland and Eurex Zurich Concerning Technical Equipment
dated September 6, 1999, Alliance Agreement between CBOT, Ceres,
Deutsche Borse, Swiss Stock Exchange, Eurex Zurich, Eurex Frankfurt, and
Eurex Deutschland dated October 1, 1999, Software License Agreement
between CBOT, Ceres, Deutsche Borse, and Swiss Stock Exchange dated
October 1, 1999, the December 31, 1999 Unanimous Written Consent of the
Supervisory Board of CBOT/Eurex Alliance, LLC, Interim Agreement for
Ceres, JV, and DBS dated January 15, 2000, the July 27, 2000
Confirmation of Rights Agreement, the April 13, 2000 Market Supervision
Services Agreement, Master Software Development Agreement, and Systems
Operations Agreement and Supporting Documents;
9) Considered the financial terms of certain recent business combination
transactions in the securities and futures exchange industry; and
10) Conducted such other studies, analyses, inquiries and investigations as
we deemed appropriate.
In our analysis and in formulating our opinion, we have assumed and relied
upon the accuracy and completeness of all the financial and other information
provided to us or publicly available, and we have not assumed any
responsibility for the independent verification of such information. We have
further relied upon the assurances of management of Ceres and the CBOT that
they are unaware of any facts that would make the information provided to us
incomplete or misleading in any material respect. We have assumed, with your
D-2-2
consent, that the financial forecasts and projections provided to us by Ceres
and/or the CBOT, if any, were prepared in good faith and on a basis reflecting
the best currently available judgments and estimates of management. We have not
prepared an independent evaluation of the software, systems architecture,
network capability, etc. of the technology assets held by the CBOT, eCBOT and
Ceres. We express no view whatever as to the federal, state or local tax
consequences of the Transaction.
Our services to the eCBOT and the CBOT in connection with the Transaction
have been comprised solely of financial advisory services and not accounting,
audit, legal or tax services. Without limiting the foregoing, our services with
respect to the Transaction do not constitute, nor should they be construed to
constitute in any way, a review or audit of or any other procedures with
respect to any financial information nor should such services be relied upon by
any person to disclose weaknesses in internal controls, financial statement
errors or irregularities, or illegal acts or omissions of any person affiliated
with the Transaction. Our opinion is necessarily based on economic and market
conditions and other circumstances as they exist and can be evaluated by us on
the date hereof.
We have not acted as financial advisor to the CBOT, eCBOT or Ceres in
connection with the Transaction other than in connection with rendering this
opinion and in connection with estimating the fair market value of Ceres and
the partnership interests in Ceres for consideration by the Boards in effecting
the Transaction. Additionally, we have not been authorized to and have not
solicited alternative offers for Ceres or its assets, or investigated any other
alternative transactions that may be available to Ceres. It is our
understanding that none of the CBOT, eCBOT or Ceres has solicited or received
any offers for Ceres or its assets. Our opinion does not address nor shall it
be construed to address the underlying business decision to effect the
Transaction. We have performed and continue to perform various internal
accounting and tax services unrelated to the Transaction for Ceres and/or the
CBOT and have received customary fees for the rendering of such services.
It is understood that this letter is solely for the benefit and use of the
Boards of Directors of the CBOT, eCBOT and Ceres in their consideration of the
Transaction and may not be relied upon by any other person, used for any other
purpose or reproduced, disseminated, quoted or referred to at any time, in any
manner or for any purpose without our prior written consent with the exception
of its inclusion in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
Registration Statement on Form S-4, as may be amended, related to the
Restructuring Transactions, including, among other things, the Transaction.
This letter does not constitute a recommendation to any member with respect to
whether to vote in favor of the Restructuring Transactions or take any other
action in connection with the Restructuring Transactions or otherwise, and
should not be relied upon by any member as such.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, including the various assumptions
and limitations set forth herein, it is our opinion that as of the date hereof,
the consideration to be received by each limited partner of Ceres in exchange
for their respective limited partnership interests pursuant to the Transaction,
is fair, from a financial point of view, to Ceres and each class of the limited
partners of Ceres.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
/S/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
OCTOBER 2, 2001
D-2-3
APPENDIX D-3
PRELIMINARY VALUATION ANALYSIS OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
Electronic Chicago Board of Trade, Inc.
Members of the Boards of Directors
c/o
Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
141 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, Illinois 60604-2994
Attn: Carol A. Burke, Executive Vice President and General Counsel
October 2, 2001
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have completed our valuation analysis of the Ceres Trading Limited
Partnership ("Ceres") and the limited partnership interests in Ceres as of June
30, 2001. The objective of our analysis was to provide our opinion of the fair
market value of Ceres and each of the underlying limited partnership interests
as of June 30, 2001 in connection with the proposed restructuring transactions.
We understand that a wholly owned affiliate of the Board of Trade of the City
of Chicago, Inc. ("CBOT"), Electronic Chicago Board of Trade, Inc. ("eCBOT"),
is the General Partner of Ceres and that the results of our analysis will be
used to assist CBOT and eCBOT in considering a proposed merger transaction in
connection with the restructuring transactions. Specifically, we understand
that our analysis will be used to assist the Boards of Directors of CBOT and
eCBOT with regard to the merger consideration to be distributed among the Ceres
limited partners pursuant to the Ceres merger.
Arthur Andersen LLP does not make specific recommendations to buy or sell;
our work is designed to provide information that will assist you in making an
informed decision. We confirm that our services as described herein do not
present a conflict of interest. We have performed and continue to perform
various accounting and tax services for the CBOT that are unrelated to the
restructuring transactions and we have received customary fees for such
services. No portion of our fee was contingent upon the completion of the Ceres
merger or the conclusion reached in our analysis. Our valuation analysis and
conclusion are subject to the attached Statement of General Assumptions and
Limiting Conditions.
Definition of Value
The basis of value in our analysis is fair market value, which is defined as
the amount at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a
willing seller when neither is acting under compulsion and when both have
reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts.
Scope of the Analysis and Methodology
We considered a broad scope of information, both internal and external to
Ceres, considered various approaches to estimating value, prepared independent
analyses and considered appropriate documents including the Ceres Second
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as of September 8,
1997 (the "Agreement"). We considered various valuation approaches, including
an income approach, market approach and net asset approach.
Income Approach. The income approach measures the value of an entity by the
present value of its future economic benefits. Value indications are developed
by discounting expected cash flows to their present value at
D-3-1
a rate of return that incorporates the time value of funds and the risks
associated with the particular investment. The discount rate selected is based
on rates of return available from alternative investments of similar type and
quality as of the valuation date.
Market Approach. The market approach measures the value of an entity through
an analysis of recent transactions or offerings of comparative entities. These
entities may be companies whose stock is actively traded or private companies
acquired in transactions for which the terms are known to us. Consideration is
given to the financial condition and operating performance of the entity being
appraised relative to those of the selected guideline companies operating in
the same or a similar line of business, and which are potentially subject to
corresponding economic, environmental, and political factors. The guideline
companies would be considered reasonable investment alternatives.
Cost or Net Asset Approach. The cost or net asset approach measures the
value of an entity by the net aggregate fair market value of the entity's
underlying assets. Application of this approach entails a restatement of the
balance sheet of the enterprise, substituting the fair market value of its
assets and liabilities for their recorded values as stated on their financial
statements. This approach is frequently used in valuing holding companies or
capital intensive firms.
We considered the three approaches described above and concluded that the
fair market value of Ceres is best determined by the net asset approach. As of
the date of valuation, the assets of Ceres consisted of its interest in the
a/c/e system software and in CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C. and its various
licensing agreements related to electronic trading support for the CBOT.
In arriving at our conclusions, we made the following assumptions:
. The CBOT transitioned from the Project A platform to the a/c/e system on
or about August 27, 2000.
. The a/c/e system is deemed to be state-of-the-art by the CBOT and the
Project A platform, as a local-area network platform, is no longer
competitive. Therefore, the a/c/e system is valuable and the Project A
platform is obsolete.
. Except for order routing software to be financed and owned by the CBOT,
Ceres owns the rights to the a/c/e system software pursuant to its
alliance agreements with Deutsche Borse AG and the Swiss Stock Exchange.
. Ceres has, both directly and indirectly, in accordance with its 50
percent ownership in CBOT/Eurex Alliance, L.L.C., incurred costs
associated with certain a/c/e system modifications and, through June 30,
2001, these expenditures totaled $47,011,080. Additionally, purchases of
computer software and systems related to the a/c/e system in the amount
of $43,650,446 were capitalized by Ceres, as of June 30, 2001.
. The CBOT intends to reorganize and consolidate its electronic trading
business into its wholly owned eCBOT subsidiary in connection with the
restructuring transactions. As a result, it would be necessary for the
CBOT to acquire, directly or indirectly, all limited partnership
interests in Ceres currently held by the members of the CBOT.
. The Ceres limited partnership agreement provides that eCBOT, as general
partner, may dissolve Ceres at will.
. The Ceres limited partnership agreement states that, upon dissolution of
Ceres, the assets of Ceres shall be liquidated and the proceeds shall be
distributed to the partners of Ceres in accordance with their capital
accounts and the balance, if any, in accordance with their percentage
interests.
We considered that rights to the use of a/c/e system and the a/c/e
system modifications could conceivably provide Ceres with the ability to
provide electronic trading capabilities to other exchanges. Under this
scenario, it is feasible that Ceres' economic profile would be similar to
that of its current operations (i.e. receiving fees for electronic trades,
etc.) or that it could license the software for use with other exchanges
for royalty payments. However, the economics under such scenarios are
highly uncertain
D-3-2
due to the speculative nature of the fees achievable in an increasingly
competitive environment and the operating costs associated with continued
maintenance of the system. Additionally, given the ability of eCBOT, as the
general partner of Ceres, to unilaterally liquidate the business, the
probability of such a scenario is extremely low.
Exhibit 1 presents the Electronic Trading Division's historical financial
statements.
Exhibit 2 presents our derivation of the net asset value of Ceres, as of
June 30, 2001. As shown, the partners' equity restated at market value amounts
to $25,367,009. Therefore, we conclude that the fair market value of Ceres, as
of the valuation date, is $25,400,000 (rounded).
Allocation of Fair Market Value to Partnership Interests
We understand that, pursuant to Section 3.4(a) of the Agreement, the
partners' capital accounts shall be marked-to-market upon dissolution of Ceres
in accordance with the terms and provisions of Section 4 of the Agreement.
Accordingly, our allocation to the Class B unit holders adjusts their capital
account balances such that 40 percent of the value is allocated pro rata
according to the number of Class B units owned and 60 percent is allocated
according to their respective Electronic Trading System Clearing Volume with
respect to contracts traded on the CBOT. For tax purposes, we understand that
the capital account balances for all Class B unit holders were zero, as of
June 30, 2001. The allocation of Ceres' market value among the Class A and
Class B unit holders is provided in Exhibit 3(a) through 3(b).
Very truly yours,
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
D-3-3
STATEMENT OF GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
This report has been made with the following general assumptions and
limiting conditions:
1. No investigation has been made of, and no responsibility is assumed for,
the legal description or legal matters related to the asset(s) being
valued, including title or encumbrances. Title to the asset(s) is
assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated. The asset(s)
is (are) assumed to be free and clear of any liens, easements or
encumbrances unless otherwise stated.
2. Information furnished by others, upon which all or portions of this
valuation are based, is believed to be reliable, but has not been
verified in all cases. No warranty is given as to the accuracy of such
information.
3. This report has been made only for the purpose stated and shall not be
used for any other purpose. Neither this report nor any portions thereof
including, without limitations, any conclusions as to value, the
identity of Arthur Andersen or any individuals signing or associated
with this report, or the professional associations or organizations with
which they are affiliated shall be disseminated to third parties by any
means without the prior written consent and approval of Arthur Andersen.
Arthur Andersen has consented to the inclusion of this report in the
Registration Statement on Form S-4, of CBOT relating to the
restructuring transactions described therein.
4. It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy,
consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any
local, state, or national, government or private entity or organization
have been, or can readily be, obtained or renewed for any use on which
the value estimate contained in this report is based.
5. Full compliance with all applicable federal, state and local zoning,
use, environmental and similar laws and regulations are assumed, unless
otherwise stated.
6. Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed.
D-3-4
EXHIBIT 1(a)
CERES TRADING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS--ELECTRONIC TRADING DIVISION
1996 2000 06/30/01
1994 Actual 1995 Actual Actual 1997 Actual 1998 Actual 1999 Actual Actual Actual
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Average Daily
Volume............. 1,789 2,086 9,526 28,812 46,161 44,640
Annual Volume....... 67,974 531,928 2,438,712 5,929,134 12,339,328 11,160,033
Revenue Per
Contract........... $ 0.35 $ 1.46 $ 2.30 $ 2.05 $ 1.84 $ 1.67
Revenues:
Nonmember Fees..... $ 20,798 $ 514,907 $3,213,283 $ 5,691,075 $22,751,000 $18,632,118
Member Fees........ 3,228 259,897 2,405,659 6,447,761 -- --
Interest........... 67,036 359,000 54,133
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Total Revenues... $ 24,026 $ 774,804 $5,618,942 $12,205,872 $23,110,000 $18,686,251 $ 7,647,694 $17,285,021
Operating Expenses:
Information
Systems
Allocation........ 351,834 760,168 1,438,233 2,307,315 2,816,646 3,658,836 976,893 5,163,206
Leased
Programmers....... 145,020 493,365 940,660 995,196 4,355,979 4,048,777 1,167,157 444,201
Other.............. 66,401 103,677 1,419,848 -- 69,853
Equity (Gain)/Loss
in CEJV........... -- 217,237
Eurex-Related
Expenses.......... 10,874,753 11,024,878 21,446,626 11,151,758
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Subtotal-
Operating
Expenses........ 496,854 1,253,533 2,378,893 3,368,912 18,151,055 20,152,339 23,590,677 17,046,256
Partnership Overhead
Expenses:
Administration
Allocation........ 62,256 88,800 102,183 97,484 -- -- 109,709 199,227
BOTCC Computer
Services.......... 8,774 9,747 8,631 8,816 -- --
Audit/Legal Fees... 8,068 14,837 29,526 32,222 -- --
Other Overhead
Expenses.......... 1,485 1,647 552 195 -- --
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Subtotal--
Overhead
Expenses........ 80,583 115,031 140,892 138,717 168,808 246,859 109,709 199,227
Earnings Before
Taxes, Interest &
Depreciation....... $ (553,411) $ (593,760) $3,099,157 $ 8,698,243 $ 4,790,137 $(1,712,947) $(16,052,691) $ 39,538
Depreciation
Expense............ 433,471 532,854 533,593 421,240 20,334 116,661 4,141,190 5,710,042
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Earnings Before
Taxes and Interest. $ (986,882) $(1,126,614) $2,565,564 $ 8,277,003 $ 4,769,803 $(1,829,608) $(20,193,881) $(5,670,504)
Interest Expenses... 167,124 262,750 192,122 13,214 12,059 988,331 1,890,512
TCAM Write-Off...... 1,962,856 -- -- --
Partnership
Income/(Loss)...... $(1,154,006) $(1,389,365) $2,373,442 $ 8,263,789 $ 2,806,947 $(1,841,667) $(21,182,212) $(7,561,016)
=========== =========== ========== =========== =========== =========== ============ ===========
Capital
Expenditures....... $ 460,844 $ 0 $ 5,372 $ 1,433,454 $ 701,000 $ 8,488,000 $ 26,962,000 $ 8,675,000
D-3-5
EXHIBIT 1(b)
CERES TRADING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
HISTORICAL STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION--ELECTRONIC TRADING DIVISION
1996 1997 1998 2000 06/30/01
1994 Actual 1995 Actual Actual Actual Actual 1999 Actual Actual Actual
YEAR ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Assets:
Cash and Cash
Equivalents.......... $ 15,190 $ 45,430 $4,237,145 $4,613,000 $ 685,524 $ 2,354,835 $ 106,542
Accounts Receivable... $ 24,026 129,194 600,642 992,856 1,800,000 993,558 1,704,872 3,415,942
Capital Contributions
Receivable........... 2,817
Prepaid Expenses...... 102,000 1,435
Deferred Organization
and Development
Costs................ 70,977 45,928 20,880
Computer Software and
Systems.............. 1,411,769 903,964 400,791 1,433,885 694,000 8,675,006 31,467,779 34,204,090
Investment in &
Advances to
CBOT/Eurex Alliance,
LLC.................. 500,000 500,000
----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Total Assets........ $ 1,506,772 $ 1,094,276 $1,067,743 $6,768,703 $7,107,000 $10,355,523 $ 36,027,486 $38,226,574
=========== =========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ============ ===========
Liabilities and
Partners' Equity:
Accounts Payable and
Accrued Expenses..... $ 34,353 $ 907 $ 115,624 $1,022,247 $5,209,000 $ 9,476,022 $ 313,323 $ 201,181
Due to CBOT/Eurex
Alliance LLC......... 9,152,623 5,480,370
Notes Payable......... 9,069,252 7,716,172
Advances from General
Partner.............. 2,757,899 3,768,212 1,253,520 1,012,059 31,481,963 46,472,922
Partners' Equity...... (1,285,480) (2,674,843) (301,401) 5,746,456 1,898,000 (132,558) (13,989,674) (21,644,070)
----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Total Liabilities
and Partners'
Equity............. $ 1,506,772 $ 1,094,276 $1,067,743 $6,768,703 $7,107,000 $10,355,523 $ 36,027,486 $38,226,574
=========== =========== ========== ========== ========== =========== ============ ===========
D-3-6
EXHIBIT 2
CERES TRADING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
ELECTRONIC TRADING DIVISION
Restated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2001
Book Fair Market
Value Value (2)
------------ -----------
Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents.......................... $ 106,542 $ 106,542
Accounts Receivable................................ 3,415,942 3,415,942
Capital Contributions Receivable................... 0 0
Prepaid Expenses................................... 0 0
Deferred Organization and Development Costs........ 0 0
Computer Software and Systems...................... 34,204,090 34,204,090
Investment in and Advances to CBOT/Eurex Alliance,
LLC............................................... 500,000 500,000
Previously Incurred, Non-Capitalized Eurex-Related
Expenses (1)...................................... 47,011,080
------------ -----------
Total Assets..................................... $ 38,226,574 $85,237,654
============ ===========
Liabilities and Partners' Equity:
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses.............. $ 201,181 $ 201,181
Due to CBOT/Eurex Alliance LLC..................... 5,480,370 5,480,370
Notes Payable...................................... 7,716,172 7,716,172
Advances from General Partner...................... 46,472,922 46,472,922
Partners' Equity................................... (21,644,070) 25,367,009
------------ -----------
Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity........... $ 38,226,574 $85,237,654
============ ===========
Concluded Value of Partnership (rounded)............. $25,400,000
--------
(1) Previously Incurred, Non-Capitalized Eurex-Related Development & Operating
Loss Expenses:
FY '98........................................................ $10,874,753
FY '99........................................................ 11,024,878
FY '00........................................................ 17,550,433
YTD '01....................................................... 7,561,016
-----------
Total..................................................... $47,011,080
===========
(2) For assets and liabilities other than the Eurex Modification Expenses,
Arthur Andersen has relied on book value as being representative of their
fair market value.
D-3-7
APPENDIX E-1
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this 7th day of August, 2001
("Effective Date") by and between the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago,
Inc., a Delaware non-stock corporation (the "CBOT"), and the Chicago Board
Options Exchange Incorporated, a Delaware non-stock corporation (the "CBOE").
WHEREAS, paragraph (b) of Article Fifth of CBOE's Certificate of
Incorporation ("Article Fifth(b)") provides, among other things, that every
present and future member of the CBOT who applies for membership in the
Corporation and who otherwise qualifies shall, so long as he remains a member
of the CBOT, be entitled to be a member of the CBOE (this right of members of
the CBOT to become members of the CBOE is referred to herein as the "Exercise
Right";
WHEREAS, the CBOT and the CBOE entered into an Agreement dated as of
September 1, 1992 (the "1992 Agreement") for the purpose of resolving a dispute
as to the meaning of certain terms as used in Article Fifth(b) and the nature
and scope of the Exercise Right;
WHEREAS, the CBOT intends to pursue a strategic restructuring as
specifically contemplated by that certain Registration Statement on Form S-4
(Registration No. 333-54370);
WHEREAS, additional disputes have arisen between the CBOT and the CBOE
regarding the Exercise Right in the context of the CBOT's proposed strategic
restructuring and the expanded operation of CBOT's electronic trading system
proposed to be implemented in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the parties, in their own capacity and on behalf of their
respective members, wish to resolve these additional disputes to their mutual
benefit;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises
and agreements contained herein (but subject to Section 11 below), the parties,
in their own capacity and on behalf of their respective members, pursuant to
the authorization of their respective Boards of Directors, agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Agreement, the definitions set forth in this Section 1,
including revised definitions of certain terms previously defined in the 1992
Agreement, shall apply. Capitalized terms used but not further defined in this
Agreement shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the 1992
Agreement.
(a) "Registration Statement" means that certain Registration Statement
on Form S-4 filed by the CBOT with the Securities and Exchange Commission
under the Securities Act of 1933 (Registration No. 333-54370).
(b) "CBOT Restructuring Transactions" means the proposed strategic
restructuring of the CBOT and the related expansion of its electronic
trading operations described in the Registration Statement, as amended by
Amendments No. 1 through 4, and as further amended subject to the
provisions of Section 11(b).
(c) "Exercise Right Coupon" means the instrument to be issued to each of
the 1,402 CBOT Full Members pursuant to and as part of the CBOT
Restructuring Transactions, which shall evidence and represent the Exercise
Right and which shall, subject to satisfaction of the other conditions to
being an Eligible CBOT Full Member as defined below, entitle the holder
thereof to become an Exerciser Member.
(d) "Eligible CBOT Full Member" has the meaning set forth in the
definition of that term in the 1992 Agreement, provided that upon
consummation of the CBOT Restructuring Transactions and in the absence of
any other material changes to the structure or ownership of the CBOT or to
the trading rights
E-1-1
and privileges appurtenant to a CBOT Full Membership not contemplated in
the CBOT Restructuring Transactions, an individual shall be deemed to be an
Eligible CBOT Full Member if the individual: (i) is the owner of (A) 25,000
shares of Class A Common Stock of the CBOT (such number being subject to
anti-dilution adjustment in the event the Class A Common Stock is subject
to a stock split, reverse split, stock dividend or other stock distribution
made to existing shareholders, or the issuance of shares to existing
shareholders at less than fair market value), and (B) one (1) share of
Class B Common Stock, Series B-1, of the CBOT, and (C) one (1) Exercise
Right Coupon, (ii) has not delegated any of the rights or privileges
appurtenant to such ownership, and (iii) meets the applicable membership
and eligibility requirements of the CBOT and is deemed to be a "CBOT Full
Member" under the CBOT's Rules and Regulations then in effect. CBOT Class A
Common Stock, CBOT Class B Common Stock and Exercise Right Coupons may be
separately bought and sold, and may be unbundled and rebundled, for
purposes of qualifying the owner thereof as an Eligible CBOT Full Member.
(e)"Eligible CBOT Full Member Delegate" has the meaning set forth in the
definition of that term in the 1992 Agreement, provided that upon
consummation of the CBOT Restructuring Transactions and in the absence of
any other material changes to the structure or ownership of the CBOT or to
the trading rights and privileges appurtenant to a CBOT Full Membership not
contemplated in the CBOT Restructuring Transactions, an individual shall be
deemed to be an eligible CBOT Full Member delegate if the individual (i) is
in possession of (A) 25,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of the CBOT
(such number being subject to anti-dilution adjustment in the event the
Class A Common Stock is subject to a stock split, reverse split, stock
dividend or other stock distribution made to existing shareholders, or the
issuance of shares to existing shareholders at less than fair market
value), and (B) one (1) share of Class B Common Stock, Series B-1, of the
CBOT, and (C) one (1) Exercise Right Coupon, (ii) holds one or more of the
items listed in (i) above through delegation rather than ownership, and
(iii) meets the applicable membership and eligibility requirements of the
CBOT and is deemed to be a "CBOT Full Member Delegate under the CBOT's
Rules and Regulations then in effect. For the purposes of this provision,
the words "in possession of" shall be deemed to include possession by
ownership, lease, or, in the case of shares, by pledge or assignment
agreement relating to such shares whereunder the owner of such shares is
precluded from selling or transferring them during the term of such pledge
or assignment agreement.
2 THE CBOT'S AGREEMENTS.
(a) The CBOT agrees, in its own capacity and on behalf of its members,
that only an individual who is an Eligible CBOT Full Member or an Eligible
CBOT Full Member Delegate is a member of the CBOT within the meaning of
Article Fifth(b) eligible to be an Exerciser Member, subject to the terms
and conditions of this Agreement, and to the extent not inconsistent with
this Agreement, the 1992 Agreement.
(b) The CBOT agrees that as part of the CBOT Restructuring Transactions
it shall issue exactly 1,402 shares of Class B Common Stock, Series B-1,
and exactly 1,402 Exercise Right Coupons, and shall distribute one (1) such
share of Class B Common Stock and one (1) such Exercise Right Coupon to
each of the 1,402 CBOT Full Members, and will not issue any additional
shares of Class B Common Stock, Series B-1, or any additional Exercise
Right Coupons. The CBOT shall also issue and distribute 25,000 shares of
its Class A Common Stock to each of the 1,402 CBOT Full Members. CBOE for
its own account and CBOE members will be free to purchase and to hold,
lease or sell the Class B shares and the Exercise Coupons without
limitation, and may also purchase, hold, lease or sell the Class A shares
subject to the same terms as other purchasers of Class A shares.
(c) The CBOT agrees and represents that it has created and will maintain
various incentives to promote the continued value of CBOT membership,
including meaningful member and delegate fee preferences (applicable to the
floor and electronic trading platform) and pit closing provisions as
described in the Registration Statement. In addition, CBOT agrees to
maintain seat ownership requirements for CBOT clearing firms. A schedule of
such current fee preferences and incentives has been provided to CBOE by
the CBOT and the CBOE has taken notice of the member and delegate fee
preferences reflected in such schedule. These fee preferences and
incentives are expected to serve the purpose of preventing
E-1-2
mass migration of CBOT exercisers to CBOE. Any questions that may
subsequently arise as to the continued meaningfulness of such preferences
and incentives for this purpose, as they may be amended from time to time,
shall be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with Section 7 of
this Agreement. The arbitration panel will have the authority: 1) to
determine whether the member and delegate fee preferences and other
incentives maintained by the CBOT remain meaningful for the purposes set
forth in this Section 2(c); 2) if that determination is unfavorable to
CBOT, to specify a remedy for CBOT's failure to maintain meaningful fee
preferences and incentives, including what CBOT must do to restore
meaningful fee preferences and incentives; and 3) to prescribe the
consequences of any failure by the CBOT to take any action required under
the remedy specified by the arbitrators, including any failure to restore
meaningful fee preferences and incentives in the manner specified, within
thirty (30) days of the panel's decision.
(d) The CBOT agrees that if a CBOT Full Member delegates his or her
membership rights to a CBOT Full Member Delegate who exercises to become an
Exerciser Member, the CBOT Full Member/delegator relinquishes all member
trading rights at both the CBOT and the CBOE, and may trade only as a
customer at customer rates at the CBOT unless the member/delegator owns
another CBOT membership which entitles that member to member trading rights
and transaction rates.
(e) The CBOT agrees that CBOT Full Member Delegates who are Exerciser
Members of the CBOE may trade on the CBOT's electronic trading platform
only at customer rates. The CBOT agrees that CBOT Full Members who are
Exerciser Members of the CBOE may trade on the CBOT's electronic trading
platform as a CBOT member at member rates only if they are not physically
present on the CBOE trading floor and are not logged on to the CBOE's
electronic trading platform. If a CBOT Full Member is present on the CBOE
trading floor or is logged on to the CBOE's electronic trading platform at
the time an order is entered or altered on the CBOT's electronic trading
platform by or on behalf of such member, then such member will be charged
CBOT customer rates for trades resulting from the execution of such orders.
(f) The CBOT agrees to amend its rules, effective no later than the
consummation of the CBOT Restructuring Transactions, to the extent
necessary to implement the provisions of this Agreement.
(g) Within five (5) dates following the Effective Date of this
Agreement, the CBOT will file a notice of voluntary dismissal of its
amended complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief and damages, Civil
Action No. 00CH1500, filed on February 16, 2001, in the Circuit Court of
Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division.
3. THE CBOE'S AGREEMENTS.
(a) The CBOE agrees, in its own behalf and on behalf of its members,
that an Eligible CBOT Full Member or an Eligible CBOT Full Member Delegate
is a member of the CBOT within the meaning of Article Fifth(b), and is
eligible to be an Exerciser Member upon satisfaction of the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and, to the extent not inconsistent with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement, the 1992 Agreement.
(b) The CBOE agrees to submit to binding arbitration in accordance with
Section 7 of this Agreement questions concerning the continued
meaningfulness of member and delegate fee preferences or other incentives
for the purpose of preventing mass migration of CBOT exercisers to CBOE as
described in Section 2(c).
(c) Within five (5) days following the Effective Date of this Agreement,
the CBOE will withdraw and terminate its proposed rulemaking request (File
No. SR-CBOE-00-44), initially filed with the Commission on August 30, 2000
and further agrees that it shall take no action to amend, modify or
otherwise limit, or terminate or cause to expire, whether by interpretation
or otherwise, the Exercise Right as a result of the completion of the
CBOT's Restructuring Transactions, except as contemplated herein.
4. ELECTRONIC TRADING. The CBOT and CBOE are each free to develop, provide,
maintain and use electronic trading platforms and to determine their respective
trading hours and access policies for all their
E-1-3
respective products without such action adversely affecting the Exercise Right
except as such action may be inconsistent with the provisions of this
Agreement.
5. INFORMATION SHARING. The parties agree to provide full information
regarding the status of all members including exercisers and delegate
exercisers on a current and continuing basis.
6. FURTHER ASSURANCES. The CBOT and the CBOE shall take such further steps
toward ensuring that their respective memberships understand the implications
of this Agreement as they shall reasonably agree, including, without
limitation, the development of either a joint or separate "question and answer"
publications, in either case subject to the approval of both the CBOT and the
CBOE, and other appropriate materials for distribution to the membership of the
CBOT and the CBOE. In addition, the CBOE and the CBOT will actively pursue
cost-sharing and other mutually beneficial initiatives.
7. ARBITRATION. Questions subject to arbitration in accordance with Sections
2(c) and 3(b) of this Agreement shall be submitted to arbitration in Chicago,
Illinois under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") and
pursuant to the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the AAA in effect at the time
arbitration is initiated. The arbitration panel shall consist of three
arbitrators: one arbitrator selected by each of the parties within 15 days
after receipt of the demand for arbitration, and a neutral arbitrator selected
by the two party-appointed arbitrators. If the two party-appointed arbitrators
cannot agree upon a person to serve as the neutral arbitrator within 30 days
after the parties have notified each other of the identity of the party-
appointed arbitrators, the neutral arbitrator shall be selected by the AAA.
8. GOVERNING LAW. Except to the extent that this Agreement is governed by
any law of the United States or of a rule or regulation adopted by a regulatory
agency pursuant to any such law, this Agreement shall in all respects be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois,
without regard to its conflicts of law doctrine.
9. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
of the successors and permitted assigns of each party hereto, provided that no
rights, obligations or liabilities hereunder shall be assignable by any party
without the prior written consent of the other party. It is expressly
understood and agreed by the parties that the conversion of the CBOT from a
Delaware non-stock, not-for-profit corporation into a Delaware stock, for-
profit corporation pursuant to the CBOT Restructuring Transactions shall have
no effect whatsoever on the validity or enforceability of this Agreement or the
1992 Agreement.
10. OTHER AGREEMENTS. The 1992 Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, and the CBOT and the CBOE hereby reaffirm all of their respective
rights and obligations thereunder except that if any provision of the 1992
Agreement conflicts with any provision of this Agreement the provisions of this
Agreement shall control. The CBOT and the CBOE agree that this Agreement and,
to the extent consistent with this Agreement, the 1992 Agreement, reflect the
complete and exclusive understanding and agreement of the parties concerning
the Exercise Right, and supersede all prior proposals and communications (oral
or written) by or between the parties on the same subject. The CBOT and the
CBOE agree to be bound by this Agreement and not to take any action
inconsistent with this Agreement.
11. APPROVALS.
(a) The CBOT and CBOE mutually agree that it is appropriate, and within
the meaning and spirit of Article Fifth(b), for the CBOE to interpret
Article Fifth(b) in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The
CBOT and the CBOE acknowledge that, as an interpretation of Article
Fifth(b), this agreement must be filed with and approved by the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in order to become effective. The CBOE will
submit any rule changes required to implement this Agreement to the SEC for
its review and approval. The CBOE also intends to submit this Agreement to
the approval of the CBOE membership. The CBOE will use its best efforts to
obtain approval from its membership and the SEC in the most expeditious
manner possible. The CBOT intends to submit any rule changes required to
E-1-4
implement this Agreement to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
("CFTC") for its review and approval. The CBOT will use its best efforts to
obtain approval from the CFTC in the most expeditious manner possible. If
the SEC, the CFTC, or both, refuse any of the above approvals unless
certain changes are made, the parties agree to consider in good faith the
adoption of the necessary changes as expeditiously as possible. If the SEC,
the CFTC or the CBOE membership thereafter refuse their approval, despite
the parties' good faith efforts, this Agreement shall be null and void, as
if never executed, and neither party shall be deemed to be in any way bound
by any term or provision, including any agreement or acknowledgement, of
this Agreement.
(b) This Agreement shall be attached as an exhibit to the CBOT's
Registration Statement and the material provisions of this Agreement shall
be summarized in that Registration Statement. This Agreement shall be null
and void, as if never executed, and neither party shall be deemed to be in
any way bound by any term or provision, including any agreement or
acknowledgement, of this Agreement if 1) the SEC does not declare the
Registration Statement effective; 2) if the CBOE does not consent to
amendments to the Registration Statement subsequent to Amendments No. 1
through 4 which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld; 3) the CBOT
membership does not vote to approve the restructuring transactions
described in the Registration Statement; 4) the CBOT does not receive a
favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), in form and
substance satisfactory to the CBOT's Board of Directors, relating to the
restructuring transactions described in the Registration Statement; 5) the
CBOT does not receive any required approvals by the CFTC relating to the
restructuring transactions described in the Registration Statement; or 6) a
court order or other government regulation prohibits or restricts the
restructuring transactions described in the Registration Statement. The
CBOT will use its best efforts to obtain approval from the SEC, the IRS and
the CFTC in the most expeditious manner possible. If the SEC, the IRS or
the CFTC refuse their approval unless certain changes are made, the CBOT
agrees to consult with the CBOE and to consider in good faith the adoption
of the necessary changes as expeditiously as possible.
CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF
INCORPORATED CHICAGO, INC.
/s/ William J. Brodsky /s/ Nickolas J. Neubauer
By: _________________________________ By: _________________________________
Chairman and CEO Chairman
Title: ______________________________ Title: ______________________________
/s/ Mark F. Duffy /s/ David J. Vitale
By: _________________________________ By: _________________________________
Vice Chairman President and CEO
Title: ______________________________ Title: ______________________________
E-1-5
APPENDIX E-2
LETTER AGREEMENT
CBOT HOLDINGS, INC.
141 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
141 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604
October 24, 2001
Chicago Board Options Exchange Incorporated
400 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60605
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We refer to that certain Agreement dated August 7, 2001, (the "August 7,
2001 Agreement") by and between the Chicago Board Options Exchange
Incorporated, a Delaware nonstock corporation (the "CBOE") and the Board of
Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., a Delaware nonstock, not-for-profit
corporation (the "CBOT"), which addressed the resolution of certain disputes
that had arisen concerning the Exercise Right. Capitalized terms used but not
otherwise defined in this letter agreement shall have the meanings set forth in
the August 7, 2001 Agreement and the 1992 Agreement as applicable.
The purpose of this letter agreement is to specify the terms and conditions
under which the August 7, 2001 Agreement will apply in the circumstances of the
proposed restructuring of the CBOT revised to accommodate the proposed holding
company structure as described in a new registration statement on form S-4 to
be filed by CBOT Holdings, Inc. ("CBOT Holdings") on or shortly after October
24, 2001 (referred to herein as the "Holdings Registration Statement"). Under
such holding company structure, the CBOT would be a for-profit, nonstock
Delaware corporation (referred to herein as the "CBOT Subsidiary") and a
subsidiary of a new stock, for-profit holding company, CBOT Holdings. Upon
completion of the restructuring, each Existing Full Member of CBOT would
receive 25,000 shares of common stock of CBOT Holdings, which corresponds to
the 25,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of CBOT referred to in the August 7,
2001 Agreement, and would receive one Class B-1 membership in the CBOT
Subsidiary and one Class C membership in the CBOT Subsidiary (which correspond
to the Class B Common Stock, Series B-1, and the Exercise Right Coupon,
respectively, referred to in the August 7, 2001 Agreement).
It is our understanding, with which we ask you to evidence your agreement by
signing a copy of this letter agreement in the space provided below, that
subject to the conditions specified in this letter agreement, and in the
absence of any other material changes to the structure or ownership of the CBOT
Subsidiary or to the trading rights and privileges appurtenant to a CBOT Full
Membership not contemplated in the CBOT Restructuring Transactions as defined
herein, the proposed restructuring of the CBOT as described in the Holdings
Registration Statement will constitute "CBOT Restructuring Transactions" for
the purposes of the August 7, 2001 Agreement, such that upon the consummation
of the CBOT's restructuring as so described, Eligible CBOT Full Members and
Eligible CBOT Full Member Delegates will continue to be entitled to become
Exerciser Members of the CBOE in accordance with Article Fifth(b), the 1992
Agreement, the August 7, 2001 Agreement and this letter agreement; provided
that all references in the August 7, 2001 Agreement to shares of Class A Common
Stock of the CBOT, shares of Class B Common Stock, Series B-1, of the CBOT and
the Exercise Right Coupon shall be deemed to refer to shares of common stock of
CBOT Holdings, the Series B-1, Class B memberships of the CBOT Subsidiary and
the Class C memberships of the CBOT Subsidiary, respectively. In addition, all
references in Sections 2 and 11 of the August 7, 2001 Agreement to the
Registration Statement shall be deemed to refer to the Holdings Registration
Statement.
E-2-1
The agreed-upon conditions to the extension of the August 7, 2001 Agreement
to the proposed holding company structure are the following:
A. CBOT Holdings shall cause the CBOT Subsidiary to comply fully with each
of the terms of the August 7, 2001 Agreement as modified by this letter
agreement.
B. CBOT Holdings will take no action, directly or indirectly, that, if taken
by the CBOT Subsidiary itself, would amount to a violation of the terms of the
August 7, 2001 Agreement as modified by this letter agreement, including but
not limited to action that would cause the various incentives to promote the
continued value of CBOT membership, including member and delegate fee
preferences and pit closing provisions and seat ownership requirements for CBOT
clearing firms as described in paragraph 2(c) of the August 7, 2001 Agreement,
to no longer be meaningful for the purpose stated in said paragraph 2(c).
C. In the event questions arise as to whether CBOT Holdings has taken or
proposes to take action that would have the effect of causing the various
incentives to promote the continued value of CBOT membership, including member
and delegate fee preferences and pit closing provisions and seat ownership
requirements for CBOT clearing firms to no longer be meaningful in violation of
its obligation in paragraph B above, such questions shall be submitted to
binding arbitration in accordance with Sections 2(c) and 7 of the August 7,
2001 Agreement, and the arbitrators will have the same authority as provided in
the August 7, 2001 Agreement to decide such questions, to specify a remedy for
CBOT Holding's failure to honor its obligation not to take any such action, and
to prescribe the consequences of any failure by CBOT Holdings to take any
action required under any such remedy specified by the arbitrators within
thirty (30) days of the arbitrators' decision.
The CBOE hereby consents to the filing with the SEC of the Holdings
Registration Statement in a form substantially the same as the draft of the
Holdings Registration Statement dated October 23, 2001, previously provided to
the CBOE.
It is understood that Sections 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the August 7, 2001
Agreement as modified by this letter agreement shall be incorporated by
reference herein, and that the provisions of those Sections shall be binding
upon CBOT Holdings to the same extent as upon CBOT, except where the context
otherwise requires.
This letter agreement supercedes in its entirety the letter agreement
executed by the parties hereto on October 19, 2001, which upon the execution of
this letter agreement shall cease to be of any force or effect.
Very truly yours,
CBOT Holdings, Inc.
/s/ Nickolas J. Neubauer
By: ____________________________________
Nickolas J. Neubauer
Its Chairman
Board of Trade of the City of Chicago,
Inc.
/s/ Nickolas J. Neubauer
By: ____________________________________
Nickolas J. Neubauer
Its Chairman
Accepted and Agreed to this 18th day of
October, 2001
Chicago Board Options Exchange
Incorporated
/s/ William J. Brodsky
By: ____________________________________
William J. Brodsky
Its Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
E-2-2
APPENDIX F
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
CBOT HOLDINGS, INC.
(Originally incorporated in the State of Delaware on August 15, 2001)
ARTICLE I
NAME
The name of the corporation is CBOT Holdings, Inc. (hereinafter referred to
as the "Corporation").
ARTICLE II
REGISTERED AGENT
The address of the registered office of the Corporation in the State of
Delaware is 9 Loockerman Street, in the City of Dover, County of Kent, Delaware
19901. The name of the registered agent of the Corporation at such address is
National Registered Agents, Inc.
ARTICLE III
CORPORATE PURPOSES
The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted by the
Corporation are to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations
may be organized under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (as
amended from time to time, the "DGCL").
ARTICLE IV
CAPITAL STOCK
A. Authorized Shares.
The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have the
authority to issue is one hundred ten million (110,000,000), consisting of one
hundred million (100,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
(the "Common Stock"), and ten million (10,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock,
par value $.001 per share (the "Preferred Stock").
B. Preferred Stock.
The Board of Directors is authorized, subject to any limitations prescribed
by law, to provide for the issuance of shares of Preferred Stock in series, and
by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware
(such certificate being hereinafter referred to as a "Preferred Stock
Designation"), to establish from time to time the number of shares to be
included in each such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences
and rights of the shares of each such series and any qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof. The number of authorized shares of
Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of
shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the Common Stock, without a vote of the holders of the Preferred
Stock, or of any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required
pursuant to the terms of any Preferred Stock Designation.
F-1
C. Common Stock Voting Rights.
Each outstanding share of Common Stock shall entitle the holder thereof to
one vote on each matter properly submitted to the stockholders of the
Corporation for their vote; provided, however, that, except as otherwise
required by law, holders of Common Stock shall not be entitled to vote on any
amendment to this Certificate of Incorporation (including any Preferred Stock
Designation) that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series
of Preferred Stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either
separately or together as a class with the holders of one or more other such
series, to vote thereon by law or pursuant to this Certificate of Incorporation
(including any Preferred Stock Designation).
D. Initial Restriction on Transfer. The Common Stock shall be subject to the
following transfer restrictions, and no Common Stock shall be sold, transferred
or otherwise disposed of, except as follows:
1. For a period commencing upon the effective date of the amendment and
restatement of this Certificate of Incorporation providing restrictions
on the transfer of Common Stock (the "Effective Date") and ending on the
date occurring two hundred seventy (270) days thereafter, no share of
Common Stock may be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of except
(a) by operation of law, (b) in a transaction specifically approved by
the Board of Directors of the Corporation or a duly authorized committee
thereof or (c) in a transaction consummated in connection with and
conditioned upon the sale, transfer or disposal of a Class B membership
and, to the extent applicable, a Class C membership, in the Board of
Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., a for-profit, nonstock corporation,
which is a subsidiary of the Corporation (the "CBOT Subsidiary"), that
results in the number of shares of Common Stock associated with the
series of such Class B membership, as set forth hereinafter in this
Section D.1., being simultaneously sold, transferred or disposed of to
the same transferee of such Class B membership and, to the extent
applicable, such Class C membership, in the CBOT Subsidiary. The number
of shares of Common Stock that may be sold, transferred or otherwise
disposed of in accordance with the preceding sentence is as follows:
25,000 shares of Common Stock with one Series B-1, Class B membership
and one Class C membership in the CBOT Subsidiary, 5,000 shares of
Common Stock with one Series B-2, Class B membership in the CBOT
Subsidiary, 2,500 shares of Common Stock with one Series B-3, Class B
membership in the CBOT Subsidiary, 300 shares of Common Stock with one
Series B-4, Class B membership in the CBOT Subsidiary, and 350 shares of
Common Stock with one Series B-5, Class B membership in the CBOT
Subsidiary.
2. For a period commencing on the day that is two hundred seventy one (271)
days following the Effective Date and ending on the day that is four
hundred fifty (450) days following the Effective Date, each holder of
Common Stock may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of an aggregate
number of shares of Common Stock up to fifteen percent (15%) of the
number of shares of Common Stock held thereby on the first day of such
period or on the Effective Date, whichever is greater; and any shares so
permitted to be sold, transferred or disposed shall not thereafter be
subject to any restrictions under this Article IV.D. In addition, such
holder may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of such holder's Common
Stock in compliance with the conditions and limitations set forth in
Article IV.D.1 during such period.
3. For a period commencing on the day that is four hundred fifty one (451)
days following the Effective Date and ending on the day that is six
hundred thirty (630) days following the Effective Date, each holder of
Common Stock may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of an aggregate
number of shares of Common Stock up to forty percent (40%) of the number
of shares of Common Stock held thereby on the first day of such period
or on the Effective Date, whichever is greater; and any shares so
permitted to be sold, transferred or disposed shall not thereafter be
subject to any restrictions under this Article IV.D. In addition, such
holder may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of such holder's Common
Stock in compliance with the conditions and limitations set forth in
Article IV.D.1 during such period.
4. For a period commencing on the day that is six hundred thirty one (631)
days following the Effective Date and ending on the day that is eight
hundred ten (810) days following the Effective Date, each holder of
Common Stock may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of an aggregate
number of shares of
F-2
Common Stock up to sixty-five percent (65%) of the number of shares of
Common Stock held thereby on the first day of such period or on the
Effective Date, whichever is greater; and any shares so permitted to be
sold, transferred or disposed shall not thereafter be subject to any
restrictions under this Article IV.D. In addition, such holder may sell,
transfer or otherwise dispose of such holder's Common Stock in
compliance with the conditions and limitations set forth in Article
IV.D.1 during such period.
5. On and after the day that is eight hundred eleven (811) days following
the Effective Date, there shall be no restrictions applicable to the
Common Stock under this Article IV.D.
6. Any purported sale, transfer or other disposition of Common Stock not in
accordance with this Article IV.D. shall be void and shall not be
recorded on the books of or otherwise recognized by the Corporation. In
connection with any sale, transfer or other disposition subject to this
Article IV.D, the transferor shall notify the Corporation and its
transfer agent, as applicable, as to which provision of this Article
IV.D such sale, transfer or disposition is being effected in compliance
with and shall furnish such documents or other evidence as the
Corporation or its transfer agent may request to verify such compliance.
The shares of Common Stock shall be represented by stock certificates
which shall have a legend thereon with respect to the restrictions of
this Article IV.D, which legend shall be removed by the Corporation or
its transfer agent, as applicable, upon issuance of any stock
certificates representing shares not subject to the restrictions of this
Article IV.D. pursuant to the terms thereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section, the Board of
Directors may remove some or all of the foregoing restrictions on transfer if
it determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that such removal is
appropriate.
ARTICLE V
MANAGEMENT OF AFFAIRS
The following provisions are inserted for the management of the business
and the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation, and for further definition,
limitation and regulation of the powers of the Corporation and of its
directors and stockholders:
A. In accordance with Section 141(a) of the DGCL, the business and
affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of a
governing body, which shall be known as the "Board of Directors." The
composition of the Board of Directors shall be as set forth in Article VI
of this Certificate of Incorporation. In addition to the powers and
authority expressly conferred upon them by statute or by this Certificate
of Incorporation or the Bylaws of the Corporation, the directors are hereby
empowered to exercise all powers and do all acts and things as may be
exercised or done by the Corporation.
B. The directors of the Corporation need not be elected by written
ballot unless the Bylaws so provide.
C. Any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of
the Corporation must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting
of stockholders of the Corporation and may not be effected by any consent
in writing by such stockholders.
D. Special meetings of stockholders of the Corporation may be called
only by the Chairman of the Board or the President of the Corporation, or
by the Board of Directors acting pursuant to a resolution adopted by a
majority of the Whole Board. For purposes of this Certificate of
Incorporation, the term "Whole Board" shall mean the total number of
authorized directors whether or not there exist any vacancies in previously
authorized directorships.
F-3
ARTICLE VI
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A. The effectiveness of the amendment and restatement of this Certificate of
Incorporation shall not change the size or composition of the Board of
Directors and the directorships thereon shall continue to have the same voting
rights (or no voting rights) associated therewith as were associated with such
directorships prior to the Effective Date. Commencing with the election of
directors at the first annual or special meeting of stockholders following the
Effective Date (the "Initial Meeting"), the number of directors constituting
the Whole Board shall be nine (9), plus any directors who the holders of any
series of Preferred Stock may be entitled to elect under specified
circumstances (hereinafter referred to as "Preferred Stock Directors"). The
terms of all directors in office prior to the Initial Meeting shall expire as
such initial meeting upon the due election and qualification of their
successors thereat. At each annual meeting of stockholders following the
Initial Meeting, directors elected to succeed those directors whose terms
expire shall be elected to hold office until the next succeeding annual meeting
of stockholders after their election or until their successors shall have been
duly elected and qualified. Commencing with the Initial Meeting, the following
qualifications for directors, other than Preferred Stock Directors, shall
apply: two (2) directors, on the date of the first of their nomination or
selection as nominees for the Board of Directors, shall be "independent
directors" as such term is defined in the Bylaws (the "Independent Directors");
five (5) directors, on the date of the first of their nomination or selection
as nominees for the Board of Directors, shall be holders of Class B memberships
in the CBOT Subsidiary and shall satisfy the qualifications for and
requirements of the applicable class and series of membership as set forth in
the Rules and Regulations of For-Profit CBOT (the "Class B Directors"); one (1)
director, not subject to any qualifications (the "At-large Director"), and one
director, not subject to any qualifications, who shall serve as Chairman of the
Board of Directors (the "Chairman Director"). The person serving as Chairman
Director shall be Chairman of the Board of Directors.
B. Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock
then outstanding, newly created directorships resulting from any increase in
the authorized number of directors or any vacancies in the Board of Directors
resulting from death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from
office or other cause shall, unless otherwise required by law or by resolution
of the Board of Directors, be filled only by a majority vote of the directors
then in office, though less than a quorum (and not by stockholders), and
directors so chosen shall hold office for a term expiring at the next annual
meeting of stockholders. No decrease in the authorized number of directors
shall shorten the term of any incumbent director.
C. Advance notice of stockholder nominations for the election of directors
and of business to be brought by stockholders before any meeting of the
stockholders of the Corporation shall be given in the manner provided in the
Bylaws of the Corporation.
ARTICLE VII
AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS
The Board of Directors is expressly empowered to adopt, amend or repeal the
Bylaws of the Corporation. Any adoption, amendment or repeal of the Bylaws by
the Board of Directors shall require the approval of a majority of the Whole
Board. The stockholders shall also have power to adopt, amend or repeal the
Bylaws; provided, however, that, in addition to any vote of the holders of any
class or series of stock of the Corporation required by any Preferred Stock
Designation, any adoption, amendment or repeal of the Bylaws by the
stockholders shall require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
sixty six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the voting power of all of the
then-outstanding shares of stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally
in the election of directors, voting together as a single class based on their
respective voting rights.
F-4
ARTICLE VIII
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
A director of the Corporation shall not be personally liable to the
Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary
duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's
duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or
omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a
knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL, or (iv) for any
transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. If
the DGCL is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or
limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a director
of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent
permitted by the DGCL, as so amended.
Any repeal or modification of the foregoing paragraph by the stockholders of
the Corporation shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a
director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or
modification.
ARTICLE IX
AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The Corporation reserves the right to amend or repeal any provision
contained in this Certificate of Incorporation in the manner prescribed by the
laws of the State of Delaware and all rights conferred upon stockholders are
granted subject to this reservation.
ARTICLE X
ISSUANCE OF RIGHTS
In addition to and not in limitation of any powers conferred upon the Board
of Directors by the DGCL, the Board of Directors is hereby authorized to create
and issue, whether or not in connection with the issuance and sale of any stock
of the Corporation or other securities or property, rights entitling any
holders of stock of the Corporation to purchase or receive from the Corporation
shares of Preferred Stock, Common Stock or other securities or assets of the
Corporation or any other entity. The times at which and the terms upon which
such rights are issued, are exercisable and are to remain outstanding shall be
determined by the Board of Directors. The authority of the Board of Directors
with respect to such rights shall include, without limitation, determination of
the following:
(A) The initial purchase price per share or other unit of the stock or other
securities or property to be purchased upon exercise of such rights;
(B) Provisions relating to the times at which and the circumstances under
which such rights may be exercised or sold or otherwise transferred, either
together with or separately from, any other stock or other securities of the
Corporation;
(C) Provisions which adjust the number or exercise price of such rights or
the amount or nature of the stock or other securities or property receivable
upon exercise of such rights in the event of a combination, subdivision or
reclassification of any stock of the Corporation, a change in ownership of the
Corporation's stock or other securities or a reorganization, merger,
consolidation, sale of assets or other occurrence relating to the Corporation
or any stock of the Corporation, and provisions restricting the ability of the
Corporation to enter into any such transaction absent an assumption by the
other party or parties thereto of the obligations of the Corporation under such
rights;
F-5
(D) Provisions which deny the holder of a specified percentage of the
outstanding stock or other securities of the Corporation the right to exercise
such rights and/or cause the rights held by such holder to become void;
(E) Provisions which permit the Corporation to redeem or to exchange such
rights; and
(F) The appointment of a rights agent with respect to such rights.
ARTICLE XI
SECTION 203
The Corporation hereby elects to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL.
* * * *
F-6
APPENDIX G
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
OF
CBOT HOLDINGS, INC.
These Bylaws shall take effect at the effective time (the "Effective Time")
of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended from time
to time, the "Certificate of Incorporation") of CBOT Holdings, Inc. (the
"Corporation") to be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
in connection with the demutualization and restructuring of the Board of Trade
of the City of Chicago, Inc. (the "Restructuring") as described in the
Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
connection with the Restructuring.
ARTICLE I--STOCKHOLDERS
Section 1. Annual Meeting.
(1) An annual meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation, for the
election of directors to succeed those whose terms expire and for the
transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting,
shall be held at such place, on such date, and at such time as the Board of
Directors of the Corporation (the "Board of Directors") shall each year fix,
which date shall be within thirteen (13) months of the last annual meeting of
stockholders.
(2) Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors and the
proposal of business to be transacted by the stockholders may be made at an
annual meeting of stockholders (a) pursuant to the Corporation's notice with
respect to such meeting, (b) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors
or (c) by any stockholder of record of the Corporation who was a stockholder of
record at the time of the giving of the notice provided for in the following
paragraph, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the
notice procedures set forth in this section.
(3) For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an
annual meeting by a stockholder pursuant to clause (c) of the foregoing
paragraph, (1) the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing
to the Secretary of the Corporation, (2) such business must be a proper matter
for stockholder action under the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (as amended from time to time, the "DGCL"), (3) if the stockholder, or
the beneficial owner on whose behalf any such proposal or nomination is made,
has provided the Corporation with a Solicitation Notice, as that term is
defined in subclause (c)(iii) of this paragraph, such stockholder or beneficial
owner must, in the case of a proposal, have delivered a proxy statement and
form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Corporation's voting
shares required under applicable law to carry any such proposal, or, in the
case of a nomination or nominations, have delivered a proxy statement and form
of proxy to holders of a percentage of the Corporation's voting shares
reasonably believed by such stockholder or beneficial holder to be sufficient
to elect the nominee or nominees proposed to be nominated by such stockholder,
and must, in either case, have included in such materials the Solicitation
Notice and (4) if no Solicitation Notice relating thereto has been timely
provided pursuant to this section, the stockholder or beneficial owner
proposing such business or nomination must not have solicited a number of
proxies sufficient to have required the delivery of such a Solicitation Notice
under this section. To be timely, a stockholder's notice shall be delivered to
the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less
than thirty (30) or more than seventy-five (75) days prior to the first
anniversary (the "Anniversary") of the date on which the Corporation first
mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year's annual meeting of
stockholders; provided, however, that for purposes of the first annual meeting
of stockholders following the Effective Time, or if the date of an annual
meeting is advanced more than thirty (30) days prior to or delayed by more than
thirty (30) days after the anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting,
notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than
the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of
business on the later of (i) the 60th day prior to such annual meeting or (ii)
the 10th
G-1
day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting
is first made. Such stockholder's notice shall set forth (a) as to each person
whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a
director (x) all information relating to such person as would be required to be
disclosed in solicitations of proxies for the election of such nominees as
directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act"), (y) whether the stockholder proposes to
nominate such person to be an Independent Director (as defined in Section 1 of
Article II of these Bylaws), a Class B Director, the At-large Director or, if
permitted by the Certificate of Incorporation, the Chairman Director (as such
terms are defined in Section A of Article VI of the Certificate of
Incorporation) and, if applicable, a statement that such person satisfies the
applicable criteria for Independent Directors or Class B Directors, as
applicable, and (z) such person's written consent to serve as a director if
elected and, if applicable, a written undertaking to promptly provide to the
Secretary of the Corporation upon request any information that the Corporation
deems to be relevant to the determination of whether such person satisfies the
applicable criteria for Independent Directors or Class B Directors, as
applicable; (b) as to any other business that the stockholder proposes to bring
before the meeting, a brief description of such business, the reasons for
conducting such business at the meeting and any material interest in such
business of such stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf
the proposal is made; (c) as to the stockholder giving the notice and the
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made
(i) the name and address of such stockholder, as they appear on the
Corporation's books, and of such beneficial owner, (ii) the class and number of
shares of the Corporation that are owned beneficially and of record by such
stockholder and such beneficial owner, and (iii) whether either such
stockholder or beneficial owner intends to deliver a proxy statement and form
of proxy to holders of, in the case of a proposal, at least the percentage of
the Corporation's voting shares required under applicable law to carry the
proposal or, in the case of a nomination or nominations, a sufficient number of
holders of the Corporation's voting shares to elect such nominee or nominees
(an affirmative statement of such intent, a "Solicitation Notice").
(4) Notwithstanding anything in the second sentence of the third paragraph
of this Section 1 to the contrary, in the event that the number of directors to
be elected to the Board of Directors is increased and there is no public
announcement naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of
the increased Board of Directors made by the Corporation at least fifty-five
(55) days prior to the Anniversary, a stockholder's notice required by this
Bylaw shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for
any new positions created by such increase, if it shall be delivered to the
Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than
the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such public
announcement is first made by the Corporation.
(5) Only persons nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in
this Section 1 shall be eligible to be elected as directors at an annual
meeting of stockholders and only such business shall be conducted at an annual
meeting of stockholders as shall have been brought before the meeting in
accordance with the procedures set forth in this section. The chairman of the
meeting shall have the power and the duty to determine whether a nomination or
any business proposed to be brought before the meeting has been made in
accordance with the procedures set forth in these Bylaws and, if any proposed
nomination or business is not in compliance with these Bylaws, to declare that
such defectively proposed business or nomination shall not be presented for
stockholder action at the meeting and shall be disregarded.
(6) For purposes of these Bylaws, "public announcement" shall mean
disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service,
Associated Press or a comparable national news service or in a document
publicly filed by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
(7) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 1, a
stockholder shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to matters set forth
in this Section 1. Nothing in this Section 1 shall be deemed to affect any
rights of stockholders to request inclusion of proposals in the Corporation's
proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.
G-2
Section 2. Special Meetings.
(1) Special meetings of the stockholders, other than those required by
statute, may be called only by the Chairman of the Board or the President of
the Corporation or by the Board of Directors acting pursuant to a resolution
adopted by a majority of the Whole Board. For purposes of these Bylaws, the
term "Whole Board" shall mean the total number of authorized directors whether
or not there exist any vacancies in previously authorized directorships. The
Board of Directors may postpone or reschedule any previously scheduled special
meeting.
(2) Only such business shall be conducted at a special meeting of
stockholders as shall have been brought before the meeting pursuant to the
Corporation's notice of meeting. The chairman of the meeting shall have the
power and the duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed
to be brought before the meeting has been made in accordance with the
procedures set forth in these Bylaws and, if any proposed nomination or
business is not in compliance with these Bylaws, to declare that such
defectively proposed business or nomination shall not be presented for
stockholder action at the meeting and shall be disregarded. Nominations of
persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made at a special meeting
of stockholders at which directors are to be elected pursuant to the
Corporation's notice of meeting (a) by or at the direction of the Board of
Directors or (b) by any stockholder of record of the Corporation who is a
stockholder of record at the time of giving of notice provided for in this
paragraph, who shall be entitled to vote at the meeting and who complies with
the notice procedures set forth in Section 1 of this Article I. Nominations by
stockholders of persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made at
such a special meeting of stockholders if the stockholder's notice required by
the third paragraph of Section 1 of this Article I shall be delivered to the
Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not earlier
than the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the
special meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the
90th day prior to such special meeting or the 10th day following the day on
which public announcement is first made of the date of the special meeting and
of the nominees proposed by the Board of Directors to be elected at such
meeting.
(3) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 2, a
stockholder shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to matters set forth
in this Section 2. Nothing in this Section 2 shall be deemed to affect any
rights of stockholders to request inclusion of proposals in the Corporation's
proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.
Section 3. Notice of Meetings.
Notice of the place, if any, date, and time of all meetings of the
stockholders, and the means of remote communications, if any, by which
stockholders and proxy holders may be deemed to be present in person and vote
at such meeting, shall be given, not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty
(60) days before the date on which the meeting is to be held, to each
stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting, except as otherwise provided
herein or required by law (meaning, here and hereinafter, as required from time
to time by the DGCL or the Certificate of Incorporation).
When a meeting is adjourned to another time or place, notice need not be
given of the adjourned meeting if the time and place, if any, thereof, and the
means of remote communications, if any, by which stockholders and proxy holders
may be deemed to be present in person and vote at such adjourned meeting are
announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken; provided, however,
that if the date of any adjourned meeting is more than thirty (30) days after
the date for which the meeting was originally noticed, or if a new record date
is fixed for the adjourned meeting, notice of the place, if any, date, and time
of the adjourned meeting and the means of remote communications, if any, by
which stockholders and proxy holders may be deemed to be present in person and
vote at such adjourned meeting, shall be given in conformity herewith. At any
adjourned meeting, any business may be transacted which might have been
transacted at the original meeting.
G-3
Section 4. Quorum.
At any meeting of the stockholders, the holders of a majority of the voting
power of all of the shares of the stock entitled to vote at the meeting,
present in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for all purposes,
unless or except to the extent that the presence of a larger number may be
required by law. Where a separate vote by a class or classes or series is
required, the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the shares of
such class or classes or series entitled to participate in such separate vote,
present in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum entitled to take
action with respect to that vote on that matter.
If a quorum shall fail to attend any meeting, the chairman of the meeting
may adjourn the meeting to another place, if any, date, or time.
Section 5. Organization.
Such person as the Board of Directors may have designated or, in the absence
of such a person, the Chairman of the Board or, in his or her absence, the
President of the Corporation or, in his or her absence, such person as may be
chosen by the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares entitled
to vote who are present, in person or by proxy, shall call to order any meeting
of the stockholders and act as chairman of the meeting. In the absence of the
Secretary of the Corporation, the secretary of the meeting shall be such person
as the chairman of the meeting appoints.
Section 6. Conduct of Business.
The chairman of any meeting of stockholders shall determine the order of
business and the procedure at the meeting, including such regulation of the
manner of voting and the conduct of discussion as seem to him or her in order.
The chairman shall have the power to adjourn the meeting to another place, if
any, date and time. The date and time of the opening and closing of the polls
for each matter upon which the stockholders will vote at the meeting shall be
announced at the meeting.
Section 7. Proxies and Voting.
At any meeting of the stockholders, every stockholder entitled to vote may
vote in person or by proxy authorized by an instrument in writing or by a
transmission permitted by law filed in accordance with the procedure
established for the meeting. Any copy, facsimile telecommunication or other
reliable reproduction of the writing or transmission created pursuant to this
paragraph may be substituted or used in lieu of the original writing or
transmission for any and all purposes for which the original writing or
transmission could be used, provided that such copy, facsimile
telecommunication or other reproduction shall be a complete reproduction of the
entire original writing or transmission.
The Corporation may, and to the extent required by law, shall, in advance of
any meeting of stockholders, appoint one or more inspectors to act at the
meeting and make a written report thereof. The Corporation may designate one or
more alternate inspectors to replace any inspector who fails to act. If no
inspector or alternate is able to act at a meeting of stockholders, the person
presiding at the meeting may, and to the extent required by law, shall, appoint
one or more inspectors to act at the meeting. Each inspector, before entering
upon the discharge of his or her duties, shall take and sign an oath faithfully
to execute the duties of inspector with strict impartiality and according to
the best of his or her ability. Every vote taken by ballots shall be counted by
a duly appointed inspector or inspectors.
All elections shall be determined by a plurality of the votes cast, and
except as otherwise required by law, all other matters shall be determined by a
majority of the votes cast affirmatively or negatively.
Section 8. Stock List.
A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at any meeting of
stockholders, arranged in alphabetical order for each class of stock and
showing the address of each such stockholder and the number of shares
G-4
registered in his or her name, shall be open to the examination of any such
stockholder for a period of at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting in the
manner provided by law.
The stock list shall also be open to the examination of any stockholder
during the whole time of the meeting as provided by law. This list shall
presumptively determine the identity of the stockholders entitled to vote at
the meeting and the number of shares held by each of them.
Section 9. Initial Meeting.
Notwithstanding anything in these Bylaws to the contrary, with respect to
stockholder nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors at
the Initial Meeting (as such term is defined in Section A of Article VI of the
Certificate of Incorporation), the Board of Directors may, in its sole and
absolute discretion, establish stockholder nomination notice requirements and
procedures to apply in lieu of all or part of the stockholder nomination notice
requirements and procedures set forth in Section 1 of this Article I and in the
second paragraph of Section 2 of this Article I.
ARTICLE II--BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 1. Number, Election, Term and Qualifications of Directors.
The effectiveness of the amendment and restatement of these Bylaws shall not
change the size or composition of the Board of Directors and the directorships
thereon shall continue to have the same voting rights (or no voting rights)
associated therewith as were associated with such directorships prior to the
effectiveness of the amendment and restatement of these Bylaws. Commencing with
the election of directors at the Initial Meeting (as such term is defined in
the Certificate of Incorporation), the number of directors constituting the
whole Board (as such term is defined in the Certificate of Incorporation) shall
be nine (9), plus any directors who the holders of any series of preferred
stock may be entitled to elect under specified circumstances (hereinafter
referred to as "Preferred Stock Directors"). The directors shall serve for such
terms and be subject to such qualifications and requirements as are set forth
in the Certificate of Incorporation.
For purposes of these Bylaws and the Certificate of Incorporation,
"independent director" means a person other than an officer or employee of the
Corporation or it subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship
which, in the sole and absolute discretion of the Board of Directors, or in the
case of a nominee, the nominating committee of the Board of Directors, would
interfere with the exercise of independent judgement in carrying out the
responsibilities of a director. The following persons shall not be considered
independent:
(A) a director who is a Member of the Board of Trade of the City of
Chicago, Inc, a nonstock, for-profit subsidiary of the Corporation ("CBOT
Subsidiary"), or who is employed by the Corporation or the CBOT Subsidiary,
or any of their respective affiliates for the current year or any of the
past three (3) years;
(B) a director who accepts any compensation from the Corporation or the
CBOT Subsidiary, or any of their respective affiliates in excess of $60,000
during the previous fiscal year, other than compensation for board service,
benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary
compensation or who primarily performs services for the Corporation or the
CBOT Subsidiary in a capacity other than as a member of their respective
boards of directors;
(C) a director who is a member of the immediate family of an individual who
is, or has been in any of the past three years, employed by the Corporation
or the CBOT Subsidiary, or any of their respective affiliates as an
executive officer. Immediate family includes a person's spouse, parents,
children, siblings, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-
law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law and anyone who resides in such person's
home;
G-5
(D) a director who is a partner in, or a controlling stockholder or an
executive officer of, any for-profit business organization to which the
Corporation or the CBOT Subsidiary made, or from which the Corporation or
the CBOT Subsidiary received, payments (other than those arising solely from
investments in the Corporation's securities or the CBOT Subsidiary's
memberships) that exceed 5% of the Corporation's, the CBOT Subsidiary's, or
the business organization's consolidated gross revenues for that year, or
$200,000, whichever is more, in any of the past three years;
(E) a director who is employed as an executive of another entity where any
of the Corporation's or the CBOT Subsidiary's executives serve on that
entity's compensation committee; and
(F) a director who is an officer, principal (as defined in the Commodity
Exchange Act and applicable Regulations promulgated thereunder) or employee
of a firm, which holds a membership in the CBOT Subsidiary either in its own
name or through an employee on behalf of the firm.
Section 2. Chairman of the Board.
The Chairman of the Board shall be the presiding officer at all meetings of
the Board of Directors and shall exercise such other powers and perform such
other duties as are delegated to him or her by the Board of Directors.
Section 3. Newly Created Directorships and Vacancies.
Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock then
outstanding, newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the
authorized number of directors or any vacancies in the Board of Directors
resulting from death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from
office or other cause shall, unless otherwise required by law or by resolution
of the Board of Directors, be filled only by a majority vote of the directors
then in office, though less than a quorum (and not by stockholders), and
directors so chosen shall hold office for a term expiring at the next annual
meeting of stockholders and until such director's successor shall have been
duly elected and qualified. No decrease in the number of authorized directors
shall shorten the term of any incumbent director.
Section 4. Regular Meetings.
Regular meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at such place or
places, on such date or dates, and at such time or times as shall have been
established by the Board of Directors and publicized among all directors. A
notice of each regular meeting shall not be required.
Section 5. Special Meetings.
Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called only by the
Chairman of the Board, the President of the Corporation or by a majority of the
Whole Board and shall be held at such place, on such date, and at such time as
they or he or she shall fix. Notice of the place, date, and time of each such
special meeting shall be given to each director by whom it is not waived by
mailing written notice not less than five (5) days before the meeting or by
telephone or by telegraphing or telexing or by facsimile or electronic
transmission of the same not less than twenty-four (24) hours before the
meeting. Unless otherwise indicated in the notice thereof, any and all business
may be transacted at a special meeting.
Section 6. Quorum.
At any meeting of the Board of Directors, a majority of the total number of
the Whole Board shall constitute a quorum for all purposes. If a quorum shall
fail to attend any meeting, a majority of those present may adjourn the meeting
to another place, date, or time, without further notice or waiver thereof.
G-6
Section 7. Participation in Meetings By Conference Telephone.
Members of the Board of Directors, or of any committee thereof, may
participate in a meeting of such Board of Directors or committee by means of
conference telephone or other communications equipment by means of which all
persons participating in the meeting can hear each other and such participation
shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.
Section 8. Conduct of Business.
At any meeting of the Board of Directors, business shall be transacted in
such order and manner as the Board of Directors may from time to time
determine, and all matters shall be determined by the vote of a majority of the
directors present, except as otherwise provided herein or required by law.
Action may be taken by the Board of Directors without a meeting if all members
thereof consent thereto in writing or by electronic transmission, and the
writing or writings or electronic transmission or transmissions are filed with
the minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors. Such filing shall be in
paper form if the minutes are maintained in paper form and shall be in
electronic form if the minutes are maintained in electronic form.
Section 9. Compensation of Directors.
Unless otherwise restricted by the certificate of incorporation, the Board
of Directors shall have the authority to fix the compensation of the directors.
The directors may be paid their expenses, if any, of attendance at each meeting
of the Board of Directors and may be paid a fixed sum for attendance at each
meeting of the Board of Directors or paid a stated salary or paid other
compensation as director. No such payment shall preclude any director from
serving the Corporation in any other capacity and receiving compensation
therefor. Members of special or standing committees may be allowed compensation
for attending committee meetings.
ARTICLE III--COMMITTEES
Section 1. Committees of the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors may from time to time designate committees of the
Board of Directors, with such lawfully delegable powers and duties as it
thereby confers, to serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. The Board
of Directors shall elect a director or directors to serve as the member or
members of any such committee, designating, if it desires, other directors as
alternate members who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any
meeting of the committee. In the absence or disqualification of any member of
any committee and any alternate member in his or her place, the member or
members of the committee present at the meeting and not disqualified from
voting, whether or not he or she or they constitute a quorum, may by unanimous
vote appoint another member of the Board of Directors to act at the meeting in
the place of the absent or disqualified member.
Section 2. Conduct of Business.
Each committee may determine the procedural rules for meeting and conducting
its business and shall act in accordance therewith, except as otherwise
provided herein or required by law. Except as otherwise determined by the Board
of Directors, adequate provision shall be made for notice to members of all
meetings; one-third ( 1/3) of the members shall constitute a quorum unless the
committee shall consist of one (1) or two (2) members, in which event one (1)
member shall constitute a quorum; and all matters shall be determined by a
majority vote of the members present. Action may be taken by any committee
without a meeting if all members thereof consent thereto in writing or by
electronic transmission, and the writing or writings or electronic transmission
or transmissions are filed with the minutes of the proceedings of such
committee. Such filing shall be in paper form if the minutes are maintained in
paper form and shall be in electronic form if the minutes are maintained in
electronic form.
G-7
ARTICLE IV--OFFICERS
Section 1. Generally.
The officers of the Corporation shall consist of a President (who shall also
be Chief Executive Officer), one or more Vice Presidents, a Secretary, a
Treasurer and such other officers as may from time to time be appointed by the
Corporation.
Section 3. President.
The President shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.
Subject to the provisions of these Bylaws and to the direction of the Board of
Directors, he or she shall have the responsibility for the general management
and control of the business and affairs of the Corporation and shall perform
all duties and have all powers which are commonly incident to the office of
chief executive or which are delegated to him or her by the Board of Directors.
He or she shall have power to sign all stock certificates, contracts and other
instruments of the Corporation which are authorized and shall have general
supervision and direction of all of the other officers (other than Chairman of
the Board), employees and agents of the Corporation.
Section 4. Vice President.
Each Vice President shall have such powers and duties as may be delegated to
him or her by the Board of Directors. One (1) Vice President shall be
designated by the Board of Directors to perform the duties and exercise the
powers of the President in the event of the President's absence or disability.
Section 5. Treasurer.
The Treasurer shall have the responsibility for maintaining the financial
records of the Corporation. He or she shall make such disbursements of the
funds of the Corporation as are authorized and shall render from time to time
an account of all such transactions and of the financial condition of the
Corporation. The Treasurer shall also perform such other duties as the Board of
Directors may from time to time prescribe.
Section 6. Secretary.
The Secretary shall issue all authorized notices for, and shall keep minutes
of, all meetings of the stockholders and the Board of Directors. He or she
shall have charge of the corporate books and shall perform such other duties as
the Board of Directors may from time to time prescribe.
Section 7. Delegation of Authority.
The Board of Directors may from time to time delegate the powers or duties
of any officer to any other officers or agents, notwithstanding any provision
hereof.
Section 8. Removal.
Any officer of the Corporation may be removed at any time, with or without
cause, by the Board of Directors.
Section 9. Action with Respect to Securities of Other Corporations.
Unless otherwise directed by the Board of Directors, the President or any
officer of the Corporation authorized by the President shall have power to vote
and otherwise act on behalf of the Corporation, in person or by proxy, at any
meeting of stockholders of or with respect to any action of stockholders of any
other corporation in which this Corporation may hold securities and otherwise
to exercise any and all rights and powers which this Corporation may possess by
reason of its ownership of securities in such other corporation.
G-8
ARTICLE V--STOCK
Section 1. Certificates of Stock.
The shares of the Corporation shall be represented by certificates unless
the Board of Directors shall by resolution provide that some or all of any
class or series of stock shall be uncertificated shares. Any such resolution
shall not apply to shares represented by a certificate until the certificate is
surrendered to the Corporation. Notwithstanding the adoption of any resolution
providing for uncertificated shares, every holder of stock represented by
certificates and upon request every holder of uncertificated shares shall be
entitled to have a certificate signed by, or in the name of the Corporation by,
the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson of the Board of Directors, or the President
or Vice President, and by the Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer, or the
Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, representing the number of shares
registered in certificate form. The form of such certificates and the
signatures thereon shall comply with the requirements of the DGCL. Any or all
of the signatures on the certificate may be by facsimile.
Section 2. Transfers of Stock.
Transfers of stock shall be subject to the restrictions on transfer set
forth in the Certificate of Incorporation and shall be made only upon the
transfer books of the Corporation kept at an office of the Corporation or by
transfer agents designated to transfer shares of the stock of the Corporation.
Except where a certificate is issued in accordance with Section 4 of Article V
of these Bylaws, an outstanding certificate for the number of shares involved
shall be surrendered for cancellation before a new certificate is issued
therefor.
Section 3. Record Date.
In order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders entitled to
notice of or to vote at any meeting of stockholders, or to receive payment of
any dividend or other distribution or allotment of any rights or to exercise
any rights in respect of any change, conversion or exchange of stock or for the
purpose of any other lawful action, the Board of Directors may, except as
otherwise required by law, fix a record date, which record date shall not
precede the date on which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted and
which record date shall not be more than sixty (60) nor less than ten (10) days
before the date of any meeting of stockholders, nor more than sixty (60) days
prior to the time for such other action as hereinbefore described; provided,
however, that if no record date is fixed by the Board of Directors, the record
date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at a meeting
of stockholders shall be at the close of business on the day next preceding the
day on which notice is given or, if notice is waived, at the close of business
on the day next preceding the day on which the meeting is held, and, for
determining stockholders entitled to receive payment of any dividend or other
distribution or allotment of rights or to exercise any rights of change,
conversion or exchange of stock or for any other purpose, the record date shall
be at the close of business on the day on which the Board of Directors adopts a
resolution relating thereto.
A determination of stockholders of record entitled to notice of or to vote
at a meeting of stockholders shall apply to any adjournment of the meeting;
provided, however, that the Board of Directors may fix a new record date for
the adjourned meeting.
Section 4. Lost, Stolen, Mutilated or Destroyed Certificates.
In the event of the loss, theft, mutilation or destruction of any
certificate of stock, another may be issued in its place pursuant to such
regulations as the Board of Directors may establish concerning proof of such
loss, theft, mutilation or destruction and concerning the giving of a
satisfactory bond or bonds of indemnity.
Section 5. Regulations.
The issue, transfer, conversion and registration of certificates of stock
shall be governed by such other regulations as the Board of Directors may
establish.
G-9
ARTICLE VI--NOTICES
Section 1. Notices.
If mailed, notice to stockholders shall be deemed given when deposited in
the mail, postage prepaid, directed to the stockholder at such stockholder's
address as it appears on the records of the Corporation. Without limiting the
manner by which notice otherwise may be given effectively to stockholders, any
notice to stockholders may be given by electronic transmission in the manner
provided in Section 232 of the DGCL.
Section 2. Waivers.
A written waiver of any notice, signed by a stockholder or director, or
waiver by electronic transmission by such person, whether given before or after
the time of the event for which notice is to be given, shall be deemed
equivalent to the notice required to be given to such person. Neither the
business nor the purpose of any meeting need be specified in such a waiver.
Attendance at any meeting shall constitute waiver of notice except attendance
for the sole purpose of objecting to the timeliness of notice.
ARTICLE VII--MISCELLANEOUS
Section 1. Facsimile Signatures.
In addition to the provisions for use of facsimile signatures elsewhere
specifically authorized in these Bylaws, facsimile signatures of any officer or
officers of the Corporation may be used whenever and as authorized by the Board
of Directors or a committee thereof.
Section 2. Corporate Seal.
The Board of Directors may provide a suitable seal, containing the name of
the Corporation, which seal shall be in the charge of the Secretary. If and
when so directed by the Board of Directors or a committee thereof, duplicates
of the seal may be kept and used by the Treasurer or by an Assistant Secretary
or Assistant Treasurer.
Section 3. Reliance upon Books, Reports and Records.
Each director, each member of any committee designated by the Board of
Directors and each officer of the Corporation shall, in the performance of his
or her duties, be fully protected in relying in good faith upon the books of
account or other records of the Corporation and upon such information,
opinions, reports or statements presented to the Corporation by any of its
officers or employees, or committees of the Board of Directors so designated,
or by any other person as to matters which such director or committee member
reasonably believes are within such other person's professional or expert
competence and who has been selected with reasonable care by or on behalf of
the Corporation.
Section 4. Fiscal Year.
The fiscal year of the Corporation shall be as fixed by the Board of
Directors.
Section 5. Time Periods.
In applying any provision of these Bylaws which requires that an act be done
or not be done a specified number of days prior to an event or that an act be
done during a period of a specified number of days prior to an event, calendar
days shall be used, the day of the doing of the act shall be excluded, and the
day of the event shall be included.
G-10
ARTICLE VIII--INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Section 1. Right to Indemnification.
Each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party
to or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a "proceeding"), by
reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, committee
member or employee of the Corporation or is or was serving at the request of
the Corporation as a director, officer, trustee, committee member or employee
of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan
(hereinafter an "indemnitee"), whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged
action in an official capacity as a director, officer, trustee, committee
member or employee or in any other capacity while serving as a director,
officer, trustee, committee member or employee shall be indemnified and held
harmless by the Corporation to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL, as
the same exists or may hereafter be amended (but, in the case of any such
amendment, only to the extent that such amendment permits the Corporation to
provide broader indemnification rights than such law permitted the Corporation
to provide prior to such amendment), against all expense, liability and loss
(including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties
and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such
indemnitee in connection therewith; provided, however, that, except as provided
in Section 3 of this ARTICLE VIII with respect to proceedings to enforce rights
to indemnification, the Corporation shall indemnify any such indemnitee in
connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such indemnitee
only if such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Board of
Directors.
Section 2. Right to Advancement of Expenses.
In addition to the right to indemnification conferred in Section 1 of this
ARTICLE VIII, an indemnitee shall also have the right to be paid by the
Corporation the expenses (including attorney's fees) incurred in defending any
such proceeding in advance of its final disposition (hereinafter an
"advancement of expenses"); provided, however, that, if the DGCL requires, an
advancement of expenses incurred by an indemnitee in his or her capacity as a
director or officer (and not in any other capacity in which service was or is
rendered by such indemnitee, including, without limitation, service to an
employee benefit plan) shall be made only upon delivery to the Corporation of
an undertaking (hereinafter an "undertaking"), by or on behalf of such
indemnitee, to repay all amounts so advanced if it shall ultimately be
determined by final judicial decision from which there is no further right to
appeal (hereinafter a "final adjudication") that such indemnitee is not
entitled to be indemnified for such expenses under this Section 2 or otherwise.
Section 3. Right of Indemnitee to Bring Suit.
If a claim under Section 1 or 2 of this ARTICLE VIII is not paid in full by
the Corporation within sixty (60) days after a written claim has been received
by the Corporation, except in the case of a claim for an advancement of
expenses, in which case the applicable period shall be twenty (20) days, the
indemnitee may at any time thereafter bring suit against the Corporation to
recover the unpaid amount of the claim. If successful in whole or in part in
any such suit, or in a suit brought by the Corporation to recover an
advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of an undertaking, the indemnitee
shall be entitled to be paid also the expense of prosecuting or defending such
suit. In (i) any suit brought by the indemnitee to enforce a right to
indemnification hereunder (but not in a suit brought by the indemnitee to
enforce a right to an advancement of expenses) it shall be a defense that, and
(ii) in any suit brought by the Corporation to recover an advancement of
expenses pursuant to the terms of an undertaking, the Corporation shall be
entitled to recover such expenses upon a final adjudication that, the
indemnitee has not met any applicable standard for indemnification set forth in
the DGCL. Neither the failure of the Corporation (including its directors who
are not parties to such action, a committee of such directors, independent
legal counsel, or its stockholders) to have made a determination prior to the
commencement of such suit that indemnification of the indemnitee is proper in
the circumstances because the indemnitee has met the applicable standard of
conduct set forth in the DGCL, nor an actual determination by the Corporation
(including its directors who are not parties to such action, a committee of
G-11
such directors, independent legal counsel, or its stockholders) that the
indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall create a
presumption that the indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct
or, in the case of such a suit brought by the indemnitee, be a defense to such
suit. In any suit brought by the indemnitee to enforce a right to
indemnification or to an advancement of expenses hereunder, or brought by the
Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of an
undertaking, the burden of proving that the indemnitee is not entitled to be
indemnified, or to such advancement of expenses, under this ARTICLE VIII or
otherwise shall be on the Corporation.
Section 4. Non-Exclusivity of Rights.
The rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses conferred
in this ARTICLE VIII shall not be exclusive of any other right which any person
may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, the Corporation's Certificate
of Incorporation, Bylaws, agreement, vote of stockholders or directors or
otherwise.
Section 5. Insurance.
The Corporation may maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect itself
and any director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation or another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any
expense, liability or loss, whether or not the Corporation would have the power
to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the
DGCL.
Section 6. Indemnification of Agents of the Corporation.
The Corporation may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the Board
of Directors, grant rights to indemnification and to the advancement of
expenses to any agent of the Corporation to the fullest extent of the
provisions of this Article with respect to the indemnification and advancement
of expenses of directors and officers of the Corporation.
Section 7. Nature of Rights.
The rights conferred upon indemnitees in this ARTICLE VIII shall be contract
rights and such rights shall continue as to an indemnitee who has ceased to be
a director, officer or trustee and shall inure to the benefit of the
indemnitee's heirs, executors and administrators. Any amendment, alteration or
repeal of this ARTICLE VIII that adversely affects any right of an indemnitee
or its successors shall be prospective only and shall not limit or eliminate
any such right with respect to any proceeding involving any occurrence or
alleged occurrence of any action or omission to act that took place prior to
such amendment or repeal.
ARTICLE IX--AMENDMENTS
The Board of Directors is expressly empowered to adopt, amend or repeal the
Bylaws of the Corporation. Any adoption, amendment or repeal of the Bylaws of
the Corporation by the Board of Directors shall require the approval of a
majority of the Whole Board. The stockholders shall also have power to adopt,
amend or repeal the Bylaws of the Corporation; provided, however, that any
adoption, amendment or repeal of the Bylaws of the Corporation by the
stockholders shall require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
sixty six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the voting power of all of the
then-outstanding shares of stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally
in the election of directors, voting together as a single class based on their
respective voting rights.
* * * *
G-12
APPENDIX H
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE
CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
(Originally incorporated in the State of Delaware under the name
Delaware CBOT, Inc. on May 12, 2000)
ARTICLE I
NAME
The name of the corporation is Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation").
ARTICLE II
REGISTERED AGENT
The address of the registered office of the Corporation in the State of
Delaware is 9 Loockerman Street, in the City of Dover, County of Kent, Delaware
19901. The name of the registered agent of the Corporation at such address is
National Registered Agents, Inc.
ARTICLE III
CORPORATE PURPOSES
The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted by the
Corporation are to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations
may be organized under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (as
amended from time to time, the "DGCL").
ARTICLE IV
MEMBERSHIP
A. General.
The Corporation shall have no authority to issue capital stock. The terms
and conditions of membership in the Corporation shall be as provided in or
pursuant to this Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation
(the "Bylaws").
H-1
B. Classes and Series of Membership.
Membership in the Corporation shall be divided into classes and series as
set forth in this Article IV.
1. Class A Membership.
There shall be one Class A Membership, which Class A Membership shall be
held by CBOT Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (including any successor
thereto, "CBOT Holdings"). Except to the extent (if any) expressly provided
herein or required by law, CBOT Holdings, as the holder of the sole Class A
Membership, shall have the exclusive right to vote on any matter to be voted on
by the members of the Corporation and shall have the exclusive right to receive
any dividend or other distribution (including upon liquidation, dissolution,
winding-up or otherwise) to be declared, paid or distributed by the
Corporation, and no other member of or class or series of membership in the
Corporation shall be entitled to vote on any matter or to receive any such
dividend or other distribution.
2. Class B Membership.
Class B Membership shall represent the right to trade on and otherwise
utilize the facilities of the Corporation in accordance with and to the extent
permitted by this Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws and the Rules and
Regulations of the Corporation (collectively the "Rules," a copy of which will
be furnished to any member of the Corporation upon written request). There
shall be 3,715 Class B Memberships, which shall be divided into five series as
follows:
1,402 Series B-1, Class B Memberships;
866 Series B-2, Class B Memberships;
162 Series B-3, Class B Memberships;
642 Series B-4, Class B Memberships; and
643 Series B-5, Class B Memberships
The respective rights and privileges of each Series of Class B Membership
shall be as provided in or pursuant to this Certificate of Incorporation, the
Bylaws and the Rules.
3. Class C Membership.
Class C Membership shall represent the right, subject to satisfaction of
certain requirements set forth in the Rules, to become a member of the Chicago
Options Exchange Incorporated (the "CBOE") pursuant to Article Fifth(b) of
CBOE's certificate of incorporation. There shall be 1,402 Class C Memberships.
The respective rights and privileges of Class C Membership shall be as provided
in or pursuant to this Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws and the Rules.
The holders of Class C Memberships shall not be entitled to vote on any matter.
C. Class B Voting Rights.
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Certificate of Incorporation,
the holders of Class B Memberships shall not be entitled to vote on any matter.
On any matter on which the holders of Series B-1, Class B Memberships and
Series B-2, Class B Memberships are entitled to vote together as a class
pursuant to Section D(2) of this Article IV, each holder of Series B-1, Class B
Memberships shall be entitled to one (1) vote per such membership and each
holder of Series B-2, Class B Memberships shall be entitled to one-sixth (1/6)
of one (1) vote per such membership.
D. Special Rights of Class B Membership.
The holders of each Series of Class B Membership shall have the trading
rights and other rights and privileges, and shall be subject to the
restrictions, terms and conditions, set forth below.
1. Series Trading Rights.
(a) Series B-1. Each holder of a Series B-1, Class B Membership who satisfies
the qualifications for and requirements of Full Membership in the
Corporation as set forth in the Rules shall be entitled to
H-2
the rights and privileges of, and shall be subject to the restrictions,
conditions and limitations on, a Full Member as set forth in this
Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws and the Rules.
(b) Series B-2. Each holder of a Series B-2, Class B Membership who satisfies
the qualifications for and requirements of Associate Membership in the
Corporation as set forth in the Rules shall be entitled to the rights and
privileges of, and shall be subject to the restrictions, conditions and
limitations on, an Associate Member as set forth in this Certificate of
Incorporation, the Bylaws and the Rules.
(c) Series B-3. Each holder of a Series B-3, Class B Membership who satisfies
the qualifications for and requirements of being a holder of a GIM
Membership Interest in the Corporation as set forth in the Rules shall be
entitled to the rights and privileges of, and shall be subject to the
restrictions, conditions and limitations on, a holder of a GIM Membership
Interest as set forth in this Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws and
the Rules.
(d) Series B-4. Each holder of a Series B-4, Class B Membership who satisfies
the qualifications for and requirements of being a holder of an IDEM
Membership Interest in the Corporation as set forth in the Rules shall be
entitled to the rights and privileges of, and shall be subject to the
restrictions, conditions and limitations on, a holder of an IDEM Membership
Interest as set forth in this Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws and
the Rules.
(e) Series B-5. Each holder of a Series B-5, Class B Membership who satisfies
the qualifications for and requirements of being a holder of a COM
Membership Interest in the Corporation as set forth in the Rules shall be
entitled to the rights and privileges of, and shall be subject to the
restrictions, conditions and limitations on, a holder of a COM Membership
Interest as set forth in this Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws and
the Rules.
(f) In addition to the rights and privileges set forth above, each holder of a
Class B Membership of any Series shall be entitled to all trading rights
and privileges with respect to those products that such holder is entitled
to trade on the open outcry exchange system of the Corporation or any
electronic trading system maintained by the Corporation or any of its
affiliates or any of their respective successors or successors-in-interest.
2. Series Voting Rights. In addition to any approval of the Board of
Directors or the holder of the Class A Membership required by this Certificate
of Incorporation or Bylaws, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the voting power of the then-outstanding Series B-1, Class B Memberships
and Series B-2, Class B Memberships, voting together as a class based on their
respective voting rights, shall be required to adopt any amendment or make any
change to this Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the Rules that, in
the sole and absolute determination of the Board of Directors, adversely
affects (a) the allocation of products that the holders of any Series of Class
B Membership are permitted to trade on the exchange facilities of the
Corporation (including both the open outcry trading system and the electronic
trading system), (b) the requirement that holders of Class B Membership who
meet the applicable membership and eligibility requirements will be charged
transaction fees for trades of the Corporation's products for their accounts
that are lower than the transaction fees charged to any participant who is not
a holder of Class B Membership for the same products, whether trading
utilizing the open outcry trading system or the electronic trading system, (c)
the authorized number of Class B Memberships, (d) the membership
qualifications or eligibility requirements for holding any Series of Class B
Membership or exercising any of the membership rights and privileges
associated with such Series or (e) the Commitment to Maintain Open Outcry
Markets set forth in Section D of Article IV of this Certificate of
Incorporation. For purposes of clause (a) of this Section, the allocation of
products that the holders of any Series of Class B Membership are permitted to
trade on the exchange facilities of the Corporation shall be deemed to be
adversely affected only if a product is eliminated from the allocation of
products the holders of a particular Series of Class B Membership is permitted
to trade. The right of the holders of Series B-1, Class B Memberships and
Series B-2, Class B Memberships to vote on the amendments and changes
specified in this Section D(2) shall apply only if any such amendment or
change is first approved
H-3
by the Board of Directors or the holder of the Class A Membership, and the
holders of Series B-1, Class B Memberships and Series B-2, Class B Memberships
shall have no right to propose, initiate or unilaterally take any of the
actions as to which they are entitled to vote pursuant to this Section D(2).
For purposes of any vote of the holders of Series B-1, Class B Memberships and
Series B-2, Class B Memberships permitted by this Certificate of Incorporation,
the Board of Directors shall be entitled to fix a record date, and only holders
of record as of such record date shall be entitled to vote on the matter to be
voted on.
3. Conversion Rights of Series B-3.
(a) Conversion. Subject to, and upon compliance with, the provisions of this
Section D(3) of Article IV, any two (2) Series B-3, Class B Memberships
shall be convertible at the option of the holder into one (1) Series B-2,
Class B Membership.
(b) Mechanics of Conversion. A holder of Series B-3, Class B Memberships may
exercise the conversion right specified in Section D(3)(a) of Article IV by
surrendering to the Corporation or any transfer agent of the Corporation the
certificate or other instruments, if any, representing the memberships to be
converted, accompanied by written notice stating that the holder elects to
convert such memberships represented thereby. Conversion shall be deemed to
have been effected on the date when delivery of such certificate or other
instrument, if any, accompanied by such written notice, is made, and such
date is referred to herein as the Conversion Date. As promptly as
practicable after the Conversion Date, the Corporation shall issue and
deliver to or upon the written order of such holder a certificate or other
instrument representing the number of Series B-2, Class B Memberships to
which such holder is entitled as a result of the exercise of such conversion
right. The person in whose name the certificate or other instrument
representing Series B-2, Class B Memberships are to be issued shall be
deemed to have become the holder of record of such Series B-2 , Class B
Memberships on the applicable Conversion Date.
(c) Memberships Reserved for Issuance. The Corporation shall take all actions
necessary to reserve and make available at all times for issuance upon the
conversion of Series B-3, Class B Memberships, such number of Series B-2,
Class B Memberships as are issuable upon the conversion of all outstanding
Series B-3, Class B Memberships.
E. Commitment to Maintain Open Outcry Markets. Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Section E of Article IV, the Corporation shall maintain open
outcry markets operating as of the date of the filing of the amendment and
restatement of this Certificate of Incorporation creating Class B Memberships
with the State of Delaware and provide financial support to each such market
for technology, marketing and research, which the Board of Directors
determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, is reasonably necessary to
maintain each such open outcry market.
Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this Certificate of
Incorporation, the Board of Directors may discontinue any open outcry market at
such time and in such manner as it may determine if (1) the Board of Directors
determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that a market is no longer
"liquid" or (2) the holders of a majority of the voting power of the then
outstanding Series B-1, Class B Memberships and Series B-2, Class B
Memberships, voting together as a single class based on their respective voting
rights, approve the discontinuance of such open outcry market.
For purposes of the foregoing, an open outcry market will be deemed "liquid"
for so long as it meets either of the following tests, in each case as measured
on a quarterly basis:
(a) if a comparable exchange-traded product exists, the open outcry market has
maintained at least 30 percent of the average daily volume of such
comparable product (including for calculation purposes, volume from
Exchange-For-Physicals transactions in such open outcry market); or
(b) if no comparable exchange-traded product exists, the open outcry market has
maintained at least 40 percent of the average quarterly volume in that
market as maintained by the Corporation in 2000 (including, for calculation
purposes, volume from Exchange-For-Physicals transactions in such open
outcry market).
H-4
ARTICLE V
MANAGEMENT OF AFFAIRS
The following provisions are inserted for the management of the business and
the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation, and for further definition,
limitation and regulation of the powers of the Corporation and of its directors
and stockholders:
A. In accordance with Sections 141(a) and 141(j) of the DGCL, the business and
affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of a
governing body, which shall be known as the "Board of Directors." The
composition of the Board of Directors shall be as set forth in Article VI of
this Certificate of Incorporation. In addition to the powers and authority
expressly conferred upon them by statute or by this Certificate of
Incorporation, the Bylaws or the Rules, the directors are hereby empowered
to adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws and the Rules of the Corporation,
subject to Sections D(2) of Article IV of this Certificate of Incorporation,
and to exercise all powers and do all acts and things as may be exercised or
done by the Corporation. Any adoption, amendment or repeal of the Bylaws or
the Rules by the Board of Directors shall require the approval of a majority
of the Whole Board. The only member of the Corporation with any power to
adopt, amend or repeal the Bylaws or the Rules of the Corporation shall be
the holder of the Class A membership, and no other member of, or class or
series of membership in, the Corporation shall have any such power, except
to the extent that the approval of the holders of Series B-1, Class B
Memberships and Series B-2, Class B Memberships is expressly required under
Section D(2) of Article IV for the Board of Directors or the holder of the
Class A Membership to adopt certain amendments and changes specified
therein.
B. Special meetings of the members of the Corporation may be called only by the
Chairman of the Board or the President of the Corporation, or by the Board
of Directors acting pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the
Whole Board. For purposes of this Certificate of Incorporation, the term
"Whole Board" shall mean the total number of authorized directors whether or
not there exist any vacancies in previously authorized directorships.
ARTICLE VI
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The holder of the Class A Membership shall have the exclusive right to vote
for and elect the members of the Board of Directors. To qualify for election
to, and continued service on, the Board of Directors, a person must be a member
of the board of directors of CBOT Holdings. The Chairman of the Board of CBOT
Holdings shall, whenever he or she is serving as a member of the Board of
Directors, be Chairman of the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE VII
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
A director of the Corporation shall not be personally liable to the
Corporation or its members for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as
a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of
loyalty to the Corporation or its members, (ii) for acts or omissions not in
good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL, or (iv) for any transaction from
which the director derived an improper personal benefit. If the DGCL is amended
to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal
liability of directors, then the liability of a director of the Corporation
shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, as
so amended.
H-5
Any repeal or modification of the foregoing paragraph shall not adversely
affect any right or protection of a director of the Corporation existing at the
time of such repeal or modification. For purposes of this Article, the term
"director" shall, to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, include any
person who, pursuant to this Certificate of Incorporation, is authorized to
exercise or perform any of the powers or duties otherwise conferred upon a
board of directors by the DGCL.
ARTICLE VIII
AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The Corporation reserves the right to amend or repeal any provision
contained in this Certificate of Incorporation in the manner prescribed by the
laws of the State of Delaware and all rights conferred upon the members of the
Corporation are granted subject to this reservation. Any amendment of, or
repeal of any provision contained in, this Certificate of Incorporation shall
require the approval of (i) the holder of the Class A Membership and, (ii) if
and to the extent required by Section D(2) of Article IV hereof, the holders of
a majority of the voting power of the then-outstanding Series B-1, Class B
Memberships and Series B-2, Class B Memberships.
* * * *
H-6
APPENDIX I
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
OF
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE
CITY OF CHICAGO, INC.
These Bylaws shall take effect at the effective time (the "Effective Time")
of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended from time
to time, the "Certificate of Incorporation") of Board of Trade of the City of
Chicago, Inc. (the "Corporation") to be filed with the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware in connection with the merger of the Corporation and the
demutualization and restructuring thereof (the "Restructuring") as described in
the Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
connection with the Restructuring; provided that, effective immediately upon
the approval and adoption of these Bylaws by the membership of the Corporation
at the meeting thereof called to vote upon the propositions relating to the
Restructuring, for the avoidance of doubt, any limitation or restriction
heretofore contained in the Bylaws, Rules (the "Rules") and Regulations (the
"Regulations") of the Corporation with respect to the rights of any holder of a
Full Membership, Associate Membership, GIM Membership Interest, IDEM Membership
Interest or COM Membership Interest to receive the dividend to be declared and
distributed in connection with the Restructuring shall be and hereby is
eliminated and the holders of each of the foregoing categories of membership
shall, until the Effective Time, be deemed to be members of the Corporation as
that term is used in Section 170 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
ARTICLE I--RULES AND REGULATIONS
Section 1. Incorporation of Rules and Regulations.
In accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, the
Rules and the Regulations, each as they may be amended from time to time, are
hereby incorporated by reference into and made part of these Bylaws.
Section 2. Member Consent to Be Bound.
The Board of Directors may adopt, amend or repeal the Regulations, which
shall not be in conflict with the Rules, and which shall have the binding
effect of Rules. By majority vote, the Board of Directors may delegate, to
particular committees as designated by the Board, the power to adopt, amend or
repeal Regulations. Applicants for membership and any person or entity holding
any membership in the Corporation shall be required to sign a written agreement
to observe and be bound by the Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws, Rules
and Regulations of the Corporation, as each may be amended from time to time.
In addition, the Board may adopt interpretations of the Certificate of
Incorporation, Bylaws, Rules and Regulations ("Interpretations") which shall be
incorporated into and deemed to be Regulations.
ARTICLE II--MEMBERSHIP
Section 1. Terms and Conditions.
The terms and conditions of membership in the Corporation, including,
without limitation, the rights and obligations of members, member firms and
delegates, shall be as provided herein, in the Certificate of Incorporation and
in the Rules and Regulations. Without limiting the foregoing, requirements with
respect to, and restrictions and limitations on, the ownership, use, purchase,
sale, transfer or other disposition of any membership or interest therein, or
any other interest of or relating to the Corporation or membership therein,
I-1
including the payment of proceeds from the sale, transfer or other disposition
of any membership or interest therein, shall be as provided herein, in the
Certificate of Incorporation and in the Rules and Regulations, or as otherwise
provided in accordance with applicable law.
Section 2. Voting Rights.
In accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation, the holder of the Class
A Membership shall have the exclusive right to vote on all matters, and no
other member of or class or series of membership in the Corporation shall be
entitled to vote on any matter, except as expressly provided otherwise in the
Certificate of Incorporation. To the extent authorized by the Certificate of
Incorporation, the Board of Directors shall be entitled to fix a record date
for purposes of determining the members entitled to vote on any matter.
Section 3. Annual and Special Meetings.
The directors of the Corporation shall be elected by the holder of the Class
A Membership at an annual meeting to be held on a date designated by the Board
of Directors, provided that no annual meeting need be held if the holder of the
Class A Membership has elected directors by written consent without a meeting.
Special meetings of the members may be called only by those persons, and in the
manner specified, in the Certificate of Incorporation. The purpose of any
special meeting shall be stated in the notice thereof.
Section 4. Notice of Meetings.
Written notice of the place, date, and time of all meetings of the members
shall be given, not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the
date on which the meeting is to be held, to each member entitled to vote at
such meeting, except as otherwise provided herein or required by law (meaning,
here and hereinafter, as required from time to time by the Delaware General
Corporation Law or the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation). The
notice of any special meeting of members shall also state the purpose or
purposes for which such meeting is called.
When a meeting is adjourned to another place, date or time, written notice
need not be given of the adjourned meeting if the place, date and time thereof
are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken; provided,
however, that if the date of any adjourned meeting is more than thirty (30)
days after the date for which the meeting was originally noticed, or if a new
record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, written notice of the place,
date, and time of the adjourned meeting shall be given in conformity herewith.
At any adjourned meeting, any business may be transacted which might have been
transacted at the original meeting without regard to the presence of a quorum
at such adjournment.
Section 5. Quorum.
The presence of the holder of the Class A Membership, in person or by proxy,
shall constitute a quorum for any meeting of members; provided that, with
respect to any matter on which only the holders of Class B Memberships are
entitled to vote pursuant to the Certificate of Incorporation, or any meeting
called solely to vote on such matters, the presence of holders of Class B
Memberships, in person or by proxy, representing a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast on such matters shall constitute a quorum. If a quorum
shall fail to attend any meeting, the chairman of the meeting or, in his or her
absence, the Chairman of the Board or the President, or the holder of the Class
A Membership, may adjourn the meeting to a subsequent time.
Section 6. Organization.
Such person as the Board of Directors may have designated or, in the absence
of such a person, the Chairman of the Board or, in his or her absence, such
person as may be chosen by the holder of the Class A Membership, shall call to
order any meeting of the members and act as chairman of the meeting. In the
absence of the Secretary of the Corporation, the secretary of the meeting shall
be such person as the chairman appoints.
I-2
Section 7. Conduct of Business.
The chairman of any meeting of members shall determine the order of business
and the procedure at the meeting, including such regulation of the manner of
voting and the conduct of discussion as seem to him or her in order.
Section 8. Consent of Members in Lieu of Meeting.
Any action required to be taken at any annual or special meeting of members
of the Corporation, or any action which may be taken at any annual or special
meeting of the members, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice
and without a vote, if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the
action so taken, shall be signed by the number of members that would be
necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all members
entitled to vote thereon were present and voted and shall be delivered to the
Corporation by delivery to its registered office in Delaware, its principal
place of business, or an officer or agent of the Corporation having custody of
the book in which proceedings of meetings of members are recorded. Delivery
made to the Corporation's registered office shall be made by hand or by
certified or registered mail, return receipt requested.
Every written consent shall bear the date of signature of each member who
signs the consent and no written consent shall be effective to take the
corporate action referred to therein unless, within sixty (60) days of the date
the earliest dated consent is delivered to the Corporation, a written consent
or consents signed by a sufficient number of members to take action are
delivered to the Corporation in the manner prescribed in the first paragraph of
this Section.
ARTICLE III--BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 1. General. The Board of Directors shall be comprised of such
persons, who shall be subject to such qualifications, shall be appointed in
such manner and shall have and exercise such powers, as provided in the
Certificate of Incorporation.
Section 2. Quorum. A majority of the total number of directors then in
office shall constitute a quorum of the Board of Directors.
Section 3. Attendance at Board Meetings.
Members of the Board or any committee who are physically present at a
meeting of the Board or any committee may adopt as the procedure of such
meeting that, for quorum purposes or otherwise, any member not physically
present but in continuous communication with such meeting shall be deemed to be
present. Continuous communication shall exist only when, by conference
telephone or similar communications equipment, a member not physically present
is able to hear and be heard by each other member deemed present, and to
participate in the proceedings of the meeting.
Section 4. Regular Meetings.
The Board shall hold regular meetings at such times as the Board may
determine from time to time.
Section 5. Special Meetings.
Special meetings of the Board may be called by the Chairman of the Board or
the President, and shall be called by the Secretary upon the written request of
three Directors. The Secretary shall give at least one hour's notice of such
meetings either by announcement on Change or by call letter.
I-3
Section 6. Certain Rights and Restrictions.
The right of any person to vote, participate or take any action in any
capacity as a member of the Board of Directors or any committee, panel or other
body shall be subject to such requirements and restrictions as may be provided
herein, in the Certificate of Incorporation and in the Rules and Regulations.
ARTICLE IV--COMMITTEES AND DEPARTMENTS
Section 1. General.
To the fullest extent permitted by law and the Certificate of Incorporation,
the Board of Directors shall have the power to appoint, and to delegate
authority to, such committees of the Board of Directors as it determines to be
appropriate from time to time.
Section 2. Additional and Standing Committees.
In addition to such committees as may be authorized by the Board of
Directors from time to time, the Corporation shall have such additional and
standing committees, which shall be comprised of such persons having such
powers and duties, as provided in the Rules and Regulations. Any person may be
disqualified from serving on or participating in the affairs of any committee
to the extent provided in the Rules and Regulations.
Section 3. Departments.
The Corporation shall have such departments as are authorized in or in
accordance with the Rules and Regulations.
ARTICLE V--OFFICERS
Section 1. General.
The Corporation shall have such officers, with such powers and duties, as
provided herein and in the Certificate of Incorporation.
Section 2. Chairman of the Board.
The Chairman of the Board of CBOT Holdings, Inc. shall, whenever he or she
is serving as a member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, be the
Chairman of the Board of the Corporation.
Section 3. President.
The President shall, subject to the powers of the Board of Directors, have
general charge of the business, affairs and property of the Corporation, and
control over its officers, agents and employees; and shall see that all orders
and resolutions of the Board of Directors are carried into effect. The
President shall execute bonds, mortgages and other contracts requiring a seal,
under the seal of the Corporation, except where required or permitted by law to
be otherwise signed and executed and except where the signing and execution
thereof shall be expressly delegated by the Board of Directors to some other
officer or agent of the Corporation. The President shall have such other powers
and perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or
as may be provided in these Bylaws.
Section 4. Officers Other Than President.
The Board shall appoint such Vice Presidents as it may deem necessary or
desirable for the efficient management and operation of the Corporation. The
Executive Vice President and any other Vice Presidents
I-4
shall be responsible to the President. The Board shall also appoint such other
officers as may be necessary. The Board may prescribe the duties and fix the
compensation of all such officers and they shall hold office during the will
of the Board.
Section 5. Bonding of Employees.
The President, Secretary, Assistant Secretary, Treasurer and Assistant
Treasurer shall be placed under bond of $50,000 each, premiums to be paid out
of the general funds of the Corporation; and such other employees of the
Office of the Secretary, who handle funds of the Corporation, shall be bonded
in the sum of $5,000 each, premiums to be paid out of the general funds of the
Corporation.
Section 6. Secretary.
The Secretary shall perform such duties as may be delegated to him or her
by the Board or the President. In addition he or she shall be charged with the
following specific duties:
(a) To take charge of the books, papers, and corporate seal of the
Corporation;
(b) To attend all meetings of the Corporation and the Board, and to
keep official records thereof;
(c) To give notices when required of all Board and membership meetings;
(d) To conduct the correspondence of the Corporation under the
direction of the proper officers;
(e) To furnish to the Chairman of every Special Committee a copy of the
resolution whereby such Committee was created;
(f) To post all notices which may be required to be posted upon the
bulletin board;
(g) To keep his or her office open during usual business hours;
(h) To see that the rooms and property of the Corporation are kept in
good order;
(i) To attest, upon behalf of the Corporation, all contracts and other
documents requiring authentication;
(j) To permit members to examine the records of the Corporation upon
reasonable request; and
(k) To post on the bulletin board from time to time the names of all
warehouses, the receipts of which are declared regular for delivery, and
also, upon direction of the Board, to post any fact tending to impair the
value of receipts issued by such warehouses.
Section 7. Assistant Secretaries.
Assistant Secretaries shall perform such duties as the Secretary or the
Board may require, and shall act as Secretary in the absence or disability of
the Secretary.
Section 8. Treasurer.
The Treasurer shall have general charge of all funds belonging to the
Corporation, and shall be charged with the following specific duties:
(a) The Treasurer shall receive from the Secretary deposit of funds
belonging to the Corporation. Checks in amounts over $10,000 shall be
signed by either the President, the Chief Financial Officer, the Treasurer,
the Secretary or the Assistant Secretary and countersigned by the Chairman
of the Board, a Vice Chairman of the Board or one of the three other
elected members of the Executive Committee;
(b) To make an annual report to the Corporation of all receipts and
disbursements; and
(c) To keep all of his or her accounts in permanent books of account
belonging to the Corporation, which books shall at all times be open to the
examination of the Board or any committee thereof.
I-5
Section 8. Assistant Treasurer.
The Assistant Treasurer shall perform such duties as the Treasurer or the
Board may require, and shall act as Treasurer in the absence or disability of
the Treasurer.
ARTICLE VI--NOTICES
Section 1. Notices.
Except as otherwise specifically provided herein or required by law, all
notices required to be given to any member, director, committee member,
officer, employee or agent shall be in writing and may in every instance be
effectively given by hand delivery to the recipient thereof, by depositing such
notice in the mails, postage paid, or by sending such notice by prepaid
telegram or mailgram. Any such notice shall be addressed to such member,
director, committee member, officer, employee or agent at his or her last known
address as the same appears on the books of the Corporation. The time when such
notice is received, if hand delivered, or dispatched, if delivered through the
mails or by telegram or mailgram, shall be the time of the giving of the
notice.
Section 2. Waivers.
A written waiver of any notice, signed by a member, director, committee
member, officer, employee or agent, whether before or after the time of the
event for which notice is to be given, shall be deemed equivalent to the notice
required to be given to such member, director, committee member, officer,
employee or agent. Neither the business nor the purpose of any meeting need be
specified in such a waiver.
ARTICLE VII--MISCELLANEOUS
Section 1. Facsimile Signatures.
Facsimile signatures of any officer or officers of the Corporation may be
used whenever and as authorized by the Board of Directors or a committee
thereof.
Section 2. Corporate Seal.
Except as may be otherwise determined by the Board of Directors from time to
time, the seal of the Corporation shall bear a figure of Justice with a ship in
the distance surrounded with the corporate name of the Corporation.
Section 3. Reliance upon Books, Reports and Records.
Each director and each member of any committee designated by the Board of
Directors, shall, in the performance of his or her duties, be fully protected
in relying in good faith upon the books of account or other records of the
Corporation and upon such information, opinions, reports or statements
presented to the Corporation by any of its officers or employees, or committees
of the Board of Directors so designated, or by any other person as to matters
which such director or committee member reasonably believes are within such
other person's professional or expert competence and who has been selected with
reasonable care by or on behalf of the Corporation.
Section 4. Fiscal Year.
The fiscal year of the Corporation shall be as fixed by the Board of
Directors from time to time.
Section 5. Time Periods.
Except as otherwise specifically provided, in applying any provision of
these Bylaws which requires that an act be done or not be done a specified
number of days prior to an event or that an act be done during a period of a
specified number of days prior to an event, calendar days shall be used, the
day of the doing of the act shall be excluded, and the day of the event shall
be included.
I-6
ARTICLE VIII--INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Section 1. Right to Indemnification.
Each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party
to or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a "proceeding"), by
reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer, committee
member or employee of the Corporation or is or was serving at the request of
the Corporation as a Director, officer, trustee, committee member or employee
of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise, including service with respect to an employee benefit plan
(hereinafter an "indemnitee"), whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged
action in an official capacity as a Director, officer, trustee, committee
member or employee or in any other capacity while serving as a Director,
officer, trustee, committee member or employee, shall be indemnified and held
harmless by the Corporation to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware
General Corporation Law, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended (but,
in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment
permits the Corporation to provide broader indemnification rights than such law
permitted the Corporation to provide prior to such amendment), against all
expense, liability and loss (including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines, ERISA
excise taxes or penalties and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred
or suffered by such indemnitee in connection therewith; provided, however,
that, except as provided in Section 3 of this ARTICLE VIII with respect to
proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, the Corporation shall
indemnify any such indemnitee in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof)
initiated by such indemnitee only if such proceeding (or part thereof) was
authorized by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
Section 2. Right to Advancement of Expenses.
The right to indemnification conferred in Section 1 of this ARTICLE VIII
shall include the right to be paid by the Corporation the expenses (including
attorney's fees) incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its
final disposition (hereinafter an "advancement of expenses"); provided,
however, that, if the Delaware General Corporation Law requires, an advancement
of expenses incurred by an indemnitee in his or her capacity as a Director or
officer (and not in any other capacity in which service was or is rendered by
such indemnitee, including, without limitation, service to an employee benefit
plan) shall be made only upon delivery to the Corporation of an undertaking
(hereinafter an "undertaking"), by or on behalf of such indemnitee, to repay
all amounts so advanced if it shall ultimately be determined by final judicial
decision from which there is no further right to appeal (hereinafter a "final
adjudication") that such indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified for such
expenses under this Section 2 or otherwise. The rights to indemnification and
to the advancement of expenses conferred in Sections 1 and 2 of this ARTICLE
VIII shall be contract rights and such rights shall continue as to an
indemnitee who has ceased to be a Director, officer, committee member or
employee and shall inure to the benefit of the indemnitee's heirs, executors
and administrators.
Section 3. Right of Indemnitee to Bring Suit.
If a claim under Section 1 or 2 of this ARTICLE VIII is not paid in full by
the Corporation within sixty (60) days after a written claim has been received
by the Corporation, except in the case of a claim for an advancement of
expenses, in which case the applicable period shall be twenty (20) days, the
indemnitee may at any time thereafter bring suit against the Corporation to
recover the unpaid amount of the claim. If successful in whole or in part in
any such suit, or in a suit brought by the Corporation to recover an
advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of an undertaking, the indemnitee
shall be entitled to be paid also the expense of prosecuting or defending such
suit. In (i) any suit brought by the indemnitee to enforce a right to
indemnification hereunder (but not in a suit brought by the indemnitee to
enforce a right to an advancement of expenses) it shall be a defense that, and
(ii) in any suit brought by the Corporation to recover an advancement of
expenses pursuant to the terms of an undertaking, the Corporation shall be
entitled to recover such expenses upon a final adjudication that, the
indemnitee has not met any applicable standard for indemnification set forth in
the Delaware General Corporation Law. Neither the failure of the Corporation
(including its Board of
I-7
Directors, independent legal counsel, or its members) to have made a
determination prior to the commencement of such suit that indemnification of
the indemnitee is proper in the circumstances because the indemnitee has met
the applicable standard of conduct set forth in the Delaware General
Corporation Law, nor an actual determination by the Corporation (including its
Board of Directors, independent legal counsel, or its members) that the
indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall create a
presumption that the indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct
or, in the case of such a suit brought by the indemnitee, be a defense to such
suit. In any suit brought by the indemnitee to enforce a right to
indemnification or to an advancement of expenses hereunder, or brought by the
Corporation to recover an advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of an
undertaking, the burden of proving that the indemnitee is not entitled to be
indemnified, or to such advancement of expenses, under this ARTICLE VIII or
otherwise shall be on the Corporation.
Section 4. Non-Exclusivity of Rights.
The rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses conferred
in this ARTICLE VIII shall not be exclusive of any other right which any person
may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, the Corporation's Certificate
of Incorporation, Bylaws, agreement, vote of members or disinterested Directors
or otherwise.
Section 5. Insurance.
The Corporation may maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect itself
and any Director, officer, committee member or employee of the Corporation or
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise
against any expense, liability or loss, whether or not the Corporation would
have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss
under the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Section 6. Indemnification of Agents of the Corporation.
The Corporation may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the Board
of Directors, grant rights to indemnification and to the advancement of
expenses to any agent of the Corporation to the fullest extent of the
provisions of this Article with respect to the indemnification and advancement
of expenses of directors and officers of the Corporation.
Section 7. Corporation Defense Expenses.
Any member or member firm who fails to prevail in a lawsuit or any other
type of legal proceeding instituted by that member or member firm against the
Corporation or any of its officers, Directors, committee members, employees or
agents must pay to the Corporation all reasonable expenses, including
attorney's fees, incurred by the Corporation in the defense of such proceeding.
Any member or member firm required to compensate the Corporation pursuant to
this section shall be assessed interest on such amount at the rate of Prime
plus 1%, which interest shall accrue from the date such amount was demanded in
writing after the member or member firm failed to prevail in a lawsuit or any
other type of legal proceeding against the Corporation.
ARTICLE IX--AMENDMENTS
These Bylaws may be amended in the manner specified in the Certificate of
Incorporation.
I-8
APPENDIX J
STATUS OF CERTAIN CURRENT CBOT RULES AND REGULATIONS AS A RESULT OF THE
RESTRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS
The following summary provides the status of certain CBOT rules and
regulations that will either be amended and restated, restated in their
entirety or repealed in connection with the completion of the restructuring
transactions. Where an existing rule or regulation will be either modified and
restated or restated in its entirety, the location of the new provision in the
amended and restated certificate of incorporation of the CBOT Subsidiary, the
form of which is attached to this document as Appendix H, and/or the amended
and restated bylaws of the CBOT Subsidiary, the form of which is attached to
this document as Appendix I, has been identified for your information and
reference. However, because changes are being made to many of the restated
provisions, you should review and consider carefully the new provisions before
voting on the restructuring transactions. In addition, the CBOT's current rules
and regulations and, subject to changes to the rules and regulations occurring
from time to time after the date of this document, the form of the rules and
regulations of the CBOT Subsidiary immediately after the restructuring
transactions have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which
this document is a part. We urge you to review carefully all of these materials
in connection with your consideration of the restructuring transactions.
We currently expect that these changes to our rules and regulations will
take effect at the time that the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation of the CBOT Subsidiary becomes effective and that the CBOT
Subsidiary will publish an amended and restated Rulebook as soon as reasonably
practicable thereafter. We currently plan to make copies of this new Rulebook
available to holders of Class B memberships in the CBOT Subsidiary in
accordance with our past practice and procedures.
110.00 Petition Ballot Vote Communications--In the event that a ballot vote is
forced by petition, all official communications, either written or
presented at a Member meeting, will be accompanied by the views of both
the Board and the petitioners. The Exchange will provide to the
petitioners a minimum of 10 days from the receipt of notice to prepare
written or presentation materials to accompany Exchange official
communications. The petitioners will be represented by a registered
sponsor (an individual who submits the original petitions and who
chooses to register as the sponsor) or his designee. If there is no
registered sponsor for the petition, the views of the Board and the
petitioners should be equitably represented by the Chief Legal Counsel
of the Exchange. (01/01/00)
Rule 110.00 will be repealed.
134.00 Board Member Voting Records--The voting record (except those involving
strategic planning or disciplinary issues) of each individual Board
member should be recorded and available the day following the vote at
the Secretary's office to any interested Full or Associate Member.
(01/01/00)
Rule 134.00 will be repealed.
144.00 Assistant Secretaries--Assistant Secretaries shall perform such duties
as the Secretary or the Board may require, and shall act as Secretary in
the absence or disability of the Secretary. 78 (08/01/94)
Rule 144.00 will be repealed.
156.00 Nominating Committee--Until the first business day of January, 2001, the
Nominating Committee shall consist of seven members: six elected members
and one elected Associate Member whose terms of office shall be three
years. Beginning on the first business day of January, 2001, the
Nominating Committee shall consist of five members: four elected Full
Members and one elected Associate Member whose terms of office shall be
three years, except as provided in the Certificate of Incorporation
Exhibit B, Section 7. The Committee members shall elect their own
Chairman who shall be a Full Member. The Associate Member shall serve as
a full voting member of the Committee. No member of the Nominating
Committee shall be eligible for re-election or reappointment for a
period of three years after his term expires. 51 (11/01/00)
Rule 156.00 will be repealed. See the Bylaws; Article III.
J-1
162.01 Standing Committees--Standing Committees may be made up of full and
associate members of the Association and members of the staff of the
Association, unless otherwise specifically provided for in the Rules and
Regulations. In addition, holders of GIM, IDEM or COM Membership
Interests may be appointed by the Chairman of the Board to serve as non-
voting advisors to any Committee. The Chairman of the Board and the
President shall be ex-officio (non-voting) members of all committees of
which they are not regular members. The Chairman of the Board, with the
approval of the Board of Directors, may appoint full or associate
members to both committees and subcommittees. (08/01/94)
Regulation 162.01 will be repealed. See the Bylaws; Article III.
162.03 Executive Committee--The Executive Committee shall consist of the
Chairman of the Board, the Vice Chairman of the Board, the President,
who shall be a non-voting member of the Committee, and three member
Directors. Two such Directors may be nominated by the Chairman of the
Board, subject to the approval of the Board. The other shall be elected
by the Board in the following manner: Nominations may be made only by
Directors who are members of the Exchange but every member of the Board,
except the President, who is a non-voting member of the Board of
Directors may vote. A majority of all votes cast shall be necessary for
election. If no nominee shall receive a majority on three ballots, a
fourth ballot shall be taken when a plurality shall elect. To be
eligible to serve on the Executive Committee, a Director must have
served at least one year as a Director. The Chairman of the Board shall
be the Chairman of the Executive Committee. (08/01/94)
Regulation 162.03 will be repealed. See the Bylaws; Article III.
162.05 Additional Committees--In addition to those appointed by the Chairman of
the Board, the Board may appoint such committees as it sees fit and
prescribe the duties thereof. 1023 (08/01/94)
Regulation 162.05 will be repealed. See the Bylaws; Article III;
Section 3.
162.09 Strategy Committee--The Strategy Committee shall consist of no more than
eleven members of the Board. A Vice Chairman of the Board will be
Chairman of the Strategy Committee. The Chairman of the Board, with the
approval of the Board of Directors, may fill any vacancy on the
Committee by appointing another member of the Board to serve on the
Committee. The responsibilities of the Strategy Committee shall be as
follows; (a) to review and recommend a strategic plan for the Exchange;
(b) to develop and track performance milestones implied in the strategic
plan; (c) to ensure that subcommittee activities are consistent with the
strategic plan; (d) to establish policies and priorities for addressing
member proposals; and (e) to understand the competitive position of the
Exchange. (03/01/99)
Regulation 162.09 will be repealed. See the Bylaws; Article III.
164.00 Finance Committee--The Chairman of the Board, with the approval of the
Board, shall appoint a Finance Committee, which shall consist of seven
members of the Board. All Finance Committee members shall be Full
Members, except that one Finance Committee member may be an Associate
Member. Each year the Chairman of the Board shall appoint the Chairman
of the Committee for a one-year term provided that the Chairman of the
Board upon the effective date of this Rule shall appoint the Chairman of
the Committee for a term that shall expire in January 1995. The Chairman
of the Board, with the approval of the Board, shall fill any vacancy in
the Committee by appointing another member of the Board to serve on the
Committee.
The responsibilities of the Finance Committee shall be as follows: (a)
to oversee the monetary affairs of the Exchange, including cash flow,
balance sheet, financing activities and investment of member capital;
(b) to review and recommend annual budgets and capital expenditure
plans for Board approval; (c) to review and recommend specific capital
expenditures over an amount to be determined by the Board; (d) to
establish revenue-sharing policies for joint ventures and alliances;
(e) to review
J-2
and recommend service, transaction processing and other service fee
structures; and (f) to review and recommend membership dues policy.
(08/01/94)
Rule 164.00 will be repealed. See the Bylaws; Article III.
165.02 Audit Committee--The Audit Committee shall be composed of four members
of the Board nominated by the Chairman of the Board and approved by the
majority vote of the Board. The Audit Committee shall be responsible for
(a) recommending the outside auditor to conduct an annual audit of the
financial affairs of the Association; (b) approving the scope of such
audits; (c) ensuring that adequate financial reporting systems and
controls are in place; (d) reviewing the audit findings and management's
response to those findings; and (e) ensuring the effectiveness of
outside auditors and the internal financial audit staff. (08/01/94)
Regulation 165.02 will be repealed. See the Bylaws; Article III.
165.03 Human Resources Committee--The Human Resources Committee shall be
composed of five members of the Board, including the Chairman of the
Board. The Chairman of the Committee shall be the Chairman of the Board.
The other members of the Committee shall be nominated by the Chairman of
the Board and approved by the Board.
The Human Resources Committee shall be responsible for (a) establishing
human resource policies; (b) approving, up to certain specified levels
which the Board from time to time shall establish, senior management
compensation specifically as follows: officer salaries (excluding the
salary of the President) and, in conjunction with the President, non-
officer salaries; (c) reviewing and recommending senior management
appointments; (d) reviewing senior management evaluations, development
and succession plans; (e) reviewing and recommending basic
organizational structure; and (f) evaluating the performance of the
President. (03/01/98)
Regulation 165.03 will be repealed. See the Bylaws; Article III.
170.00 Departments--The Board, or the President with the approval of the Board,
is authorized to establish and maintain such departments as may be
deemed necessary from time to time, and the Board shall make all needful
Regulations applicable thereto. All such departments shall be under the
supervision of the President, who shall be responsible to the Board. 81
(08/01/94)
Rule 170.00 will be repealed.
181.00 Retirement--The Board is authorized to adopt, maintain, amend, and
terminate, from time to time, a plan or plans for the retirement of
employees of the Association and its wholly owned subsidiary
corporations and for the payment of pensions to such retired employees;
provided, however that no such plan or plans shall be applicable to
employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement pension
plan; and provided, further, that no retired employee now receiving
retirement compensation shall have his combined Government assistance
and retirement compensation which was in effect prior to September 1,
1950, reduced as a result of any such plan or plans. 76 (08/01/94)
Rule 181.00 will be repealed.
184.00 Appropriations--There shall be no appropriation of money or property of
the Association except for the purpose of its legitimate business or to
promote the purposes of its organization. 601 (08/01/94)
Rule 184.00 will be repealed.
185.00 Repealing Clause--These Rules shall be effective upon such days as may
be proclaimed by the Board. Upon the taking effect of these Rules, all
former Rules and Regulations shall be repealed, except as herein
provided, and except that prior transactions shall be governed by the
Rules previously in effect. 606 (08/01/94)
Rule 185.00 will be repealed.
J-3
186.00 Liability Under Previous Rules and Regulations--The provisions of the
Rules and Regulations in force immediately prior to the adoption of
these Rules and Regulations shall be superseded hereby, except that such
adoption shall not affect the liability of any member of the Association
for any offense theretofore committed, or any rights or liabilities
theretofore acquired or incurred. 607 (08/01/94)
Rule 186.00 will be repealed.
190.00 Compensation Information--Information enumerating all compensation and
gifts (over a value of $1,000) from the Exchange of any kind and nature,
including, but not limited to, salaries, deferred payments, bonuses,
retirement benefits, trusts, and potential severance payments to the
President, Executive Vice-Presidents, members of the Board of Directors,
or to any organizations, corporations, partnerships, or associations
with which the above individuals are associated either as shareholders,
partners, or by other means will be made available on a quarterly basis
at the Secretary's office to any interested Full or Associate Member
requesting this information. (01/01/00) OF FORMAL INTERPRETATION CBOT
RULE 190.00-COMPENSATION INFORMATION (Adopted by Board of Directors
February 15, 2000)
Pursuant to Rule 190.00, the following information will be made
available on a quarterly basis by the Secretary's Office to any Full or
Associate member requesting this information:
Compensation
Information enumerating all direct compensation and gifts (over a
value of $1,000) from the Exchange of any kind and nature since the
beginning of the CBOT's last fiscal year, including but not limited
to, salaries, deferred payments, bonuses, retirement benefits,
trusts and potential severance payments to the President, Executive
Vice-Presidents, and members of the Board of Directors.
Transactions
Information about any transaction or series of similar transactions
to which the Exchange or any of its subsidiaries was or is a party,
and in which the President, any Executive Vice-President, any member
of the Board of Directors, or any immediate family member of such
persons, had or has a material interest. An interest shall not be
deemed "material" within the meaning of this rule:
(a) Where the interest arises only (i) from such person's
position as a director of another corporation or
organization which is a party to the transaction; or (ii)
from the direct or indirect ownership by such person of less
than a ten percent (10%) equity interest in another person
(other than a partnership) which is a party to the
transaction; or (iii) from both such position and ownership.
(b) Where the interest arises only from such person's position
as a limited partner in a partnership in which the person
and all other persons specified in the above paragraph have
an interest of less than ten percent (10%); or
(c) Where the interest arises solely from the holding of an
equity interest (including a limited partnership interest,
but excluding a general partnership interest) or a creditor
interest in another person that is a party to the
transaction with the Exchange or any of its subsidiaries,
and the transaction in question represents five percent (5%)
or less of the other entity's consolidated gross revenues
for its last full fiscal year. (04/01/00)
Rule 190.00 will be repealed.
J-4
Interpretation--The Board of Directors adopted the following on April 17,
1990 as a formal rule interpretation which confirms established Exchange
practice: "For purposes of all petition provisions in Rules 102.00 "Nominations
for Elective Office' and 107.00 "Amendment of Rules', the signature of an
Associate Member shall count for 1/6th of the signature of a Full Member."
(08/01/94)
The above Interpretation will be repealed.
210.00
[To Come]
* * * * *
J-5
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 20. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Delaware General Corporation Law
Under Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, CBOT Holdings is
empowered to indemnify its directors and officers in the circumstances therein
provided. Certain portions of Section 145 are summarized below:
Section 145(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a
corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other
than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact
that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a
director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys'
fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if
such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed
to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to
believe such person's conduct was unlawful.
Section 145(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a
corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in
the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of
the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of
the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a
director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses (including attorneys' fees)
actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense
or settlement of such action or suit if such person acted in good faith and in
a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation and except that no indemnification shall be made
in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have
been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent
that the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit
was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of
liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is
fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the
Delaware Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
Section 145(c) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that to the
extent that a present or former director or officer of a corporation has been
successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or
proceeding referred to in Section 145(a) and (b), or in defense of any claim,
issue or matter therein, such person shall be indemnified against expenses
(including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in
connection therewith.
Section 145(d) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that any
indemnification under Section 145(a) and (b) (unless ordered by a court) shall
be made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a
determination that indemnification of the present or former director, officer,
employee or agent is proper in the circumstances because such person has met
the applicable standard of conduct set forth in Section 145(a) and (b). Such
determination shall be made, with respect to a person who is a director or
officer at the time of such determination, (1) by a majority vote of the
directors who were not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, even though
less than a quorum, or (2) by a committee of such directors designated by
majority vote of such directors, even though less than a quorum, or (3) if
there are no such directors, or if such directors so direct, by independent
legal counsel in a written opinion, or (4) by the stockholders.
II-1
Section 145(e) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that
expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by an officer or director in
defending any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action, suit or
proceeding may be paid by the corporation in advance of the final disposition
of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on
behalf of such director or officer to repay such amount if it shall ultimately
be determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified by the
corporation as authorized in Section 145. Such expenses (including attorneys'
fees) incurred by former directors and officers or other employees and agents
may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the board of
directors deems appropriate.
Section 145(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that the
indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by, or granted pursuant
to, Section 145 shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which
those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under
any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or
otherwise.
Section 145(g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a
corporation shall have the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf
of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a
director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise against any liability asserted against such
person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of such
person's capacity as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power
to indemnify such person against such liability under Section 145.
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
The amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, provides
that a director of CBOT Holdings shall not be personally liable to CBOT
Holdings or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty
as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty
of loyalty to CBOT Holdings or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not
in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law, (iii) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law ("DGCL"),
or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit. If the DGCL is amended to authorize corporate action further
eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability
of a director of the CBOT Holdings shall be eliminated or limited to the
fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, as so amended.
Bylaws
Each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party
to or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a "proceeding"), by
reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or an officer of CBOT
Holdings or is or was serving at the request of CBOT Holdings as a director,
officer or trustee of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture,
trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to an employee
benefit plan (hereinafter an "indemnitee"), whether the basis of such
proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director, officer or
trustee or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer or
trustee, shall be indemnified and held harmless by CBOT Holdings to the fullest
extent authorized by the DGCL, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended
(but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment
permits CBOT Holdings to provide broader indemnification rights than such law
permitted CBOT Holdings to provide prior to such amendment), against all
expense, liability and loss (including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines, ERISA
excise taxes or penalties and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred
or suffered by such indemnitee in connection therewith; provided, however,
that, except as otherwise provided in the bylaws with respect to proceedings to
enforce rights to indemnification, CBOT Holdings shall indemnify any such
indemnitee in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such
indemnitee only if such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the
board of directors.
II-2
In addition, an indemnitee shall also have the right to be paid by CBOT
Holdings the expenses (including attorney's fees) incurred in defending any
such proceeding in advance of its final disposition (hereinafter an
"advancement of expenses"); provided, however, that, if the DGCL requires, an
advancement of expenses incurred by an indemnitee in his or her capacity as a
director or officer (and not in any other capacity in which service was or is
rendered by such indemnitee, including, without limitation, service to an
employee benefit plan) shall be made only upon delivery to CBOT Holdings of an
undertaking (hereinafter an "undertaking"), by or on behalf of such indemnitee,
to repay all amounts so advanced if it shall ultimately be determined by final
judicial decision from which there is no further right to appeal (hereinafter a
"final adjudication") that such indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified
for such expenses.
If a claim for indemnification is not paid in full by CBOT Holdings within
sixty (60) days after a written claim has been received by CBOT Holdings,
except in the case of a claim for an advancement of expenses, in which case the
applicable period shall be twenty (20) days, the indemnitee may at any time
thereafter bring suit against CBOT Holdings to recover the unpaid amount of the
claim. If successful in whole or in part in any such suit, or in a suit brought
by CBOT Holdings to recover an advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of
an undertaking, the indemnitee shall be entitled to be paid also the expense of
prosecuting or defending such suit. In (i) any suit brought by the indemnitee
to enforce a right to indemnification hereunder (but not in a suit brought by
the indemnitee to enforce a right to an advancement of expenses) it shall be a
defense that, and (ii) in any suit brought by CBOT Holdings to recover an
advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of an undertaking, CBOT Holdings
shall be entitled to recover such expenses upon a final adjudication that, the
indemnitee has not met any applicable standard for indemnification set forth in
the DGCL. Neither the failure of CBOT Holdings (including its directors who are
not parties to such action, a committee of such directors, independent legal
counsel, or its stockholders) to have made a determination prior to the
commencement of such suit that indemnification of the indemnitee is proper in
the circumstances because the indemnitee has met the applicable standard of
conduct set forth in the DGCL, nor an actual determination by CBOT Holdings
(including its directors who are not parties to such action, a committee of
such directors, independent legal counsel, or its stockholders) that the
indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall create a
presumption that the indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct
or, in the case of such a suit brought by the indemnitee, be a defense to such
suit. In any suit brought by the indemnitee to enforce a right to
indemnification or to an advancement of expenses hereunder, or brought by CBOT
Holdings to recover an advancement of expenses pursuant to the terms of an
undertaking, the burden of proving that the indemnitee is not entitled to be
indemnified, or to such advancement of expenses, under the bylaws or otherwise
shall be on CBOT Holdings.
The rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses conferred
in the bylaws shall not be exclusive of any other right which any person may
have or hereafter acquire under any statute, CBOT Holdings' certificate of
incorporation, agreement, vote of stockholders or directors or otherwise.
Insurance
CBOT Holdings may maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect itself and
any director, officer, employee or agent of CBOT Holdings or another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any
expense, liability or loss, whether or not CBOT Holdings would have the power
to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the
DGCL.
II-3