10KSB 1 v076028_10ksb.htm Unassociated Document


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-KSB

(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

OR
 
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to


  PHANTOM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

 
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
65-1048794
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
222 Grace Church St., Suite 302
Port Chester, NY 10573
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
(866) 452-9883 (Issuer’s telephone number)
 
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
 
Common Stock, $.001 par value per share
(Title of each class)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x  Yes  o No

Check if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o No x

State issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $0.

At May 15, 2007, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the average bid and asked price of such common equity, was $1,799,433.

The number of shares issued and outstanding of our company’s common stock at May 15, 2007 was 1,799,433,415
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):  o Yes  x No
 


 

 
PHANTOM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
 
2006 FORM 10-KSB ANNUAL REPORT
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
Page
Number
 
 
 
PART I
 
1
 
 
 
Item 1.
Description of Business
1
 
 
 
Item 2.
Description of Property
13
 
 
 
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
13
 
 
 
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 15
 
 
 
PART II
 
16
 
 
 
Item 5.
Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
 16
 
 
 
Item 6.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
20
 
 
 
Item 7.
Financial Statements
 25
 
 
 
Item 8.
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
25
 
 
 
Item 8A.
Controls and Procedures
26
 
 
 
Item 8B.
Other Information
 26
 
 
 
PART III
 
26
 
 
 
Item 9.
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, Control Persons and Corporate Governance; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
 
26
 
 
 
Item 10.
Executive Compensation
29
 
 
 
Item 11.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
31
 
 
 
Item 12.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
33
 
 
 
Item 13.
Exhibits
36
 
 
 
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
38


 
 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
  
THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB, INCLUDING EXHIBITS THERETO, CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE TYPICALLY IDENTIFIED BY THE WORDS "ANTICIPATES”, "BELIEVES”, "EXPECTS”, "INTENDS”, "FORECASTS”, "PLANS”, "FUTURE”, "STRATEGY”, OR WORDS OF SIMILAR MEANING. VARIOUS FACTORS COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE EXPRESSED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED IN "RISK FACTORS" AND ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION IN THIS FORM 10-KSB. THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO OBLIGATION TO UPDATE THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO REFLECT ACTUAL RESULTS, CHANGES IN ASSUMPTIONS, OR CHANGES IN OTHER FACTORS, EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY LAW.
PART I

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the “Annual Report”), "we," "us," "our," "Phantom" and "our Company" refer to Phantom Entertainment, Inc. and our subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
 
General Overview

Phantom Entertainment has developed and is manufacturing and marketing the Phantom Lapboard, a combination wireless keyboard, laser mouse and hard surface that enables users to work or play games from any comfortable setting. After establishing sales and distribution of the Phantom Wireless Lapboard, we may seek to develop and market the Phantom Game Service, a video game delivery system designed to allow consumers to search, preview and play a large selection of video games on demand via a broadband Internet connection.

We have not yet generated any revenue from operations. We have entered into major, multi-product licensing agreements with Ione Technology Inc., a worldwide leading manufacturer and marketer of input devices, to manufacture and distribute the Phantom® Wireless Lapboard and Phantom® Wireless Laser Mouse under Ione’s brand name throughout Asia and through Ione’s distributors in the US and Europe in return for royalty and design fees. We anticipate we will begin to receive revenue from these agreements in the 4th quarter of 2007.

The agreements allow Ione Technology to market an Ione wireless lapboard and Ione wireless laser mouse as a combo package and as stand-alone products through Ione’s distributors in the US, Europe in markets throughout Asia including:

·    
Taiwan
·    
China
·    
Hong Kong
·    
Japan
·    
South Korea
·    
Thailand
·    
Philippines
·    
Indonesia
·    
Viet Nam
·    
Laos
·    
Cambodia
·    
Burma
·    
Malaysia
·    
Singapore
·    
India
·    
Bangladesh
·    
Sri Lanka

We have received a purchase order from Alienware® - the leading manufacturer of high-performance desktop, notebook, media center and professional systems - to manufacture and supply the Phantom® Wireless Lapboard and Phantom® Wireless Laser Mouse for Alienware’s Media Center PCs and its PC gear product line. We anticipate we will begin to receive revenue from Alienware in the 4th quarter of 2007.

We have entered a distribution and sales agreement with Global Marketing Partners to serve the E-Commerce and retail markets throughout the United States. The agreement will aggregate sales of the Phantom Wireless Lapboard through Global Marketing Partner’s distribution channel with Ingram Micro Inc. (NYSE: IM), the world's largest technology distributor and a leading technology sales, marketing and logistics company. We anticipate we will begin to receive revenue from this agreement in the 4th quarter of 2007.
 
1

 
We have entered a sales agreement with Westex Europe NV to serve the E-Commerce, retail and OEM industrial markets throughout Europe. Westex Europe NV, a sales organization for high technology products and solutions, will target original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), value-added resellers (VARS), systems builders and E- commerce retailers in Europe.

In August 2006, we launched a new website and online store to support the marketing and sales of the Phantom Lapboard. The website can be found at www.phantom.net. We have a backlog of online orders for the Phantom Lapboard. Credit card payments will not be charged until the Phantom Lapboard ships. We anticipate we will begin to receive revenue from online orders in the 4th quarter of 2007.

Our ability to generate revenue from the Phantom brand is dependent on our ability to successfully manufacture and market the Phantom Wireless Lapboard under Phantom’s brand name throughout North America and Europe. While we anticipate launching sales and distribution of the Phantom Wireless Lapboard in September 2007, delays may occur and given our limited resources, we need immediate additional capital to manufacture the Phantom Wireless Lapboard as well as to fund general operations.

Phantom Lapboard

Currently our business activities are almost entirely dedicated to manufacturing and marketing of the Phantom Wireless Lapboard. The Phantom Wireless Lapboard includes wireless technology, ergonomic design, one-touch features, programmable keys and a wireless high performance 1200 dpi laser mouse. The Lapboard’s innovative design features a keyboard that rotates 360 degrees to accommodate left or right handed users and inclines on a 22 degree angle with a hard surface below for the Phantom Laser Mouse.
 
Marketing Overview and Media coverage

In October 2006, we hired Wiredset Digital Agency for online marketing and branding of its Phantom Lapboard and Game Service. The New York agency, best-known for creative online and mobile solutions, was selected for its expertise and success in the online marketing of entertainment and media companies. In 2006, online marketing efforts produced the following online coverage:
 
Third Party & Blog Marketing

Objective: News Items/Blog Posts - Discussing the Phantom Lapboard

• CrunchGear,
• Gamasutra
• ESB Brain Wave
• Krunker
• Technophobic
• PC Gamer Podcast
• TechBlog
• Engadget
• Slash Gear
• Gizmodo
• Gizmodo UK
• Daily Tech
• I4U
• Gaming Nexus
• Tek News
• Gadget Life
• Tech lime
• Game Zone
• Tech Report
• Firing Squad
• Overclockers Club
• Raptor’s Blog
• Game Planet
• Kotaku
• Wired
• Ubergizmo
• Macworld
• Gadgets Fosfor
• PGNX
• Untangled Life
• New Launches
• 2DayBlog
• Anything & Everything
• GadMag (German)
• BizToolbelt
• Mobile Mag
• Free Load
• Nerd Approved
• Techno Toy
• Ichigo:Noterat (Not English)
• Digital Drops

2

 
The Phantom Wireless Lapboard and Phantom Wireless Laser Mouse were featured products in the MTV, Digitallife and Daily Lounge 2006 online holiday gift guides.

Online Video 2.0 Channels:

Objective: Syndicate Phantom promo video across the online video channels.
• YouTube
• MySpace - http://www.myspace.com
• Google - http://video.google.com
• Yahoo! - http://video.yahoo.com
• Microsoft Soapbox - http://soapbox.msn.com
• iFilm - http://www.ifilm.com
• Daily Motion - http://www.dailymotion.com
• Grouper - http://www.grouper.com
• Bolt - http://www.bolt.com
• Blip.tv - http://www.blip.tv
• Vimeo - http://www.vimeo.com
• Vsocial - http://www.vsocial.com
• Clipshack - http://www.clipshack.com
• Eyespot - http://www.eyespot.com
• Metacafe - http://www.metacafe.com
• Castpost - http://www.castpost.com
• Revver - http://www.revver.com
• Vidilife - http://www.vidilife.com

Web 2.0 Marketing:

Objective: Make Phantom assets and web links accessible on Web 2.0 social networks to maximize visibility in Web. 2.0 search and their respective sites.
 
• OnlyWire - http://www.onlywire.com

Tradeshow Marketing
 
The Phantom® Wireless Lapboard was viewed by thousands of consumers, retailers, distributors and consumer electronic followers at tradeshows.

·    
the Games Convention (GC 2006) August 24-27, at the Leipzig Fair Exhibition Centre in Leipzig, Germany.

·    
the 2006 DigitalLife, Ziff Davis Media's leading consumer electronics and entertainment event, October 12-15, at the Jacob Javits Center in New York City.

·    
the seventh annual Electronic House Expo November 15-17, at the Long Beach Convention Center in Long Beach, California.

Marketing Objectives & Strategies

Our objective is to increase awareness and build buzz for Phantom Lapboard launch. The Phantom Lapboard is designed with a gamer in mind, and is intended to transform the way gamers think about computer keyboards. To do this, we intend to intercept gamers virally by inhabiting their communities and informing them about the Phantom Lapboard in an informal and provocative manner and leveraging PR assets to create incremental industry and consumer buzz.

3

 
Viral Marketing

Viral marketing is sometimes used to describe a version of Internet-based stealth marketing campaigns, including the use of blogs, seemingly amateur web sites, to create word of mouth for a new product or service. Often the ultimate goal of viral marketing campaigns is to generate media coverage via "offbeat" stories worth many times more than the campaigning company's advertising budget. The term "viral advertising" refers to the idea that people will pass on and share appealing and entertaining content; this is often sponsored by a brand, which is looking to build awareness of a product or service. Viral marketing is popular due to the ease of executing the marketing campaign, relative low-cost (compared to direct mail), good targeting, and the high and rapid response rate. The main strength of viral marketing is its ability to obtain a large number of interested people at a low cost.

We intend to heavily rely on viral marketing and viral advertising to achieve our marketing objectives. Viral marketing and viral advertising refer to marketing techniques that seek to exploit pre-existing social networks to produce exponential increases in brand awareness, through viral processes similar to the spread of an epidemic. It is word-of-mouth delivered and enhanced online; it harnesses the network effect of the Internet and can be very useful in reaching a large number of people rapidly.

Tactics we intend to utilize are one-to-one and online/viral techniques to identify, communicate and drive hardcore gamers (who are the most likely early adopters) to the Phantom Internet website. We also intend to infiltrate best-in-class video game communities with simple, easy to understand message and seeding on tech blogs, gaming sites and on-line player forums with compelling imagery and links to lapboard eye candy.

We intend to utilize low cost guerilla events to demo the product, reward involvement and interest from core target groups and to draw media attention to the Phantom Lapboard introduction. We will schedule PR announcements and interviews at appropriate times and intend to introduce highly limited and targeted print and web advertising to support launch and key periods for advertising during the year such as the Game Developers Conference (GDC).

After initial launch, we intend to use database marketing and relationship marketing techniques to build loyalty and increase sales, roll out targeted advertising and promotions to grow initial interest/purchase of lapboard and to support new retailer partnerships, and leverage contract and content partnerships for presence at key industry events, such as E3 at Blizzard booth, gaming tournaments, etc. With respect to leveraging contract and content partnerships, we intend to utilize all of our pre-existing relationships and forge new relationships in order to increase sales of the Phantom Lapboard. Such relationships are likely to include vendors in the games industry.

Distribution Strategy

In August 2006, we launched a new website and online store to support the marketing and sales of the Phantom Lapboard. The website can be found at www.phantom.net. We may establish other sales and marketing distribution channels through brick and mortar retailers. “Brick and mortar retail customers” typically refer to customers of companies that have a physical presence (for example, a building made of “bricks and mortar”) and offer face-to-face consumer experiences, as opposed to an Internet-only presence.

We have received a purchase order from Alienware® - the leading manufacturer of high-performance desktop, notebook, media center and professional systems - to manufacture and supply the Phantom® Wireless Lapboard and Phantom® Wireless Laser Mouse for Alienware’s Media Center PCs and its PC gear product line.

We have entered a distribution and sales agreement with Global Marketing Partners to serve the E-Commerce and retail markets throughout the United States. The agreement will aggregate sales of the Phantom Wireless Lapboard through Global Marketing Partner’s distribution channel with Ingram Micro Inc. (NYSE: IM), the world's largest technology distributor and a leading technology sales, marketing and logistics company.

We have entered a sales agreement with Westex Europe NV to serve the E-Commerce, retail and OEM industrial markets throughout Europe. Westex Europe NV, a sales organization for high technology products and solutions, will target original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), value-added resellers (VARS), systems builders and E- commerce retailers in Europe.

We may establish additional retail partner programs designed to generate recurring revenue streams for retailers from the sale of the Phantom Lapboard. Retailers may receive a percentage of the sales revenue.
 
4

 
Competition

While we are not aware of any direct competitors to our Phantom Lapboard, we will compete indirectly with a large number of hardware manufacturers, Internet sites, and other companies providing gaming and entertainment services. Our competitors may include hardware manufactures, Internet sites, and other companies providing gaming and entertainment accessories; vertical markets where competitors may have advantages in expertise, brand recognition, and other factors; and manufacturers of personal computers or game consoles who may develop their own accessories to which they would direct their customers.

Intellectual Property

We will rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our intellectual property rights.

With respect to patents, we intend to protect aspects of technologies associated with the make and use of the Phantom Lapboard through both design and utility patent applications in the United States and potentially in other countries in which we intend to market our products and services.

As of December 31, 2006, we had a total of 6 pending domestic patent applications with the US Patent and Trademark Office, entitled:
 
 
(1)
Method And Apparatus For Backlighting Of A Keyboard For Use With A Game   Device Application Filed August 2, 2004
 
 
(2)
Method For Automatic Patching Of A Sparsely Streamed Application Filed September 29, 2004
 
 
(3)
Modified Keyboard And Systems Containing The Keyboard Application   Filed May 6, 2005
 
 
(4)
Multi-Mode Pointing Device And Systems And Methods Using The Pointing   Device Application Filed May 6, 2005
 
 
(5)
Multiposition Multilevel User Interface System   Application Filed   May 6, 2005
 
 
(6)
System For Securely Booting A Computer Device   Application Filed   July 6, 2005
 
The Phantom Lapboard and Game Service that we hope to re-focus resources on if we are successful with the Phantom Lapboard, may also utilize proprietary firmware and/or software that we develop in order to enhance the gamer’s experience.

We are pursuing federal registration of our trademarks and service marks in the United States with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. As of December 31, 2006, we had 2 independent federal trademarks registered, the design of the Phantom logo which expires on December 21, 2014 and the word "Phantom" which expires on June 14, 2015 and 6 applications pending.

Although we do not believe that our claimed intellectual property rights infringe the rights of third parties, third parties have in the past asserted trademark infringement claims, and may in the future assert, patent and/or trademark infringement claims against us which may result in costly litigation or which would require us to either settle or obtain a license to use third-party intellectual property rights.

EMPLOYEES

As of May 14, 2007, we had 3 full-time employees, one who is in engineering and development and 2 of whom are general and administrative personnel. There is no collective bargaining agreement in place.
 
5

 
RISK FACTORS

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND COMPANY

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements in this annual report. The risks described below are not the only ones facing our Company, but represent all of those risks deemed material to the Company. Additional risks not presently known to us may also impair our business operations.

WE HAVE A HISTORY OF LOSSES WHICH MAY CONTINUE, REQUIRING US TO SEEK ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF CAPITAL WHICH MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE, REQUIRING US TO CURTAIL OR CEASE OPERATIONS.

We incurred a loss from operations of $4,454,583 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and a loss from operations of $12,236,530 for the year ended December 31, 2005. Our monthly burn rate is approximately $200,000 per month and, accordingly, we will need to raise approximately $2,400,000 over the next 12 months in order to sustain our current operations. We reduced our staff during the first quarter of 2006 and adjusted associated payroll, benefits, and rent for our corporate headquarters accordingly. With these modifications, we made the aforementioned estimate of our monthly burn rate. We cannot assure you that we can achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. If revenues grow more slowly than we anticipate, or if operating expenses exceed our expectations or cannot be adjusted accordingly, we will continue to incur losses. Additionally, we will continue to incur losses until we are able to market and sell our products. Our possible success is dependent upon the successful development and marketing of our products, as to which there is no assurance. Any future success that we might enjoy will depend upon many factors, including factors out of our control or which cannot be predicted at this time. These factors may include changes in or increased levels of competition, including the entry of additional competitors and increased success by existing competitors, changes in general economic conditions, increases in operating costs, including costs of supplies, personnel and equipment, reduced margins caused by competitive pressures and other factors. These conditions may have a materially adverse effect upon us or may force us to reduce or curtail operations. In addition, we will require additional funds to sustain and expand our sales and marketing activities, particularly if a well-financed competitor emerges. We need additional financing and there can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. The inability to obtain sufficient funds from operations or external sources would require us to curtail or cease operations.

OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS HAVE EXPRESSED SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN, WHICH MAY HINDER OUR ABILITY TO OBTAIN FUTURE FINANCING.

In their report dated May 15, 2007, our independent auditors stated that our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 were prepared assuming that we would continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is an issue raised as a result of cash flow constraints, a working capital deficit of $18,344,236, an accumulated deficit of $73,550,242 at December 31, 2006, recurring losses from operations and the default on $2,242,276 of notes payable at December 31, 2006. We continue to experience net losses. Our ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to generate a profit and/or obtain necessary funding from outside sources, including obtaining additional funding from the sale of our securities, increasing sales or obtaining loans and grants from various financial institutions where possible. Our continued net losses and stockholders’ deficit increases the difficulty in meeting such goals and there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful.

WE WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO LAUNCH OUR PHANTOM LAPBOARD AND IF WE ARE UNSUCCESSFUL IN OBTAINING ADDITIONAL FUNDING, WE WILL BE UNABLE TO EXECUTE OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND GO OUT OF BUSINESS.

We will need to obtain additional funding in order to:

·
fund product development and launch of our Phantom Lapboard;

·
finance additional growth and working capital requirements;
 
6

 
·
respond to competitive pressures; and

·
respond to other opportunities or challenges as they arise.
 
We expect that additional equity financing will result in substantial dilution of our stockholders. Debt financing will result in higher interest expense. The amount of any such debt cannot be predicted at this time, nor can our ability to obtain or service such debt be predicted. Moreover, there is no assurance that future equity or debt financing will be available on terms acceptable to us. Failure to obtain additional financing could cause us to go out of business.

BECAUSE WE HAVE A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY SINCE OUR INCEPTION IN DECEMBER 9, 2002 AND HAVE NOT GENERATED ANY REVENUE SINCE INCEPTION, AND SINCE THE PC ACCESSORY INDUSTRY IS RAPIDLY CHANGING, WE ARE UNABLE TO ACCURATELY FORECAST OUR REVENUES OR OUR ACTUAL COSTS OF OPERATIONS, AND A SHORT-FALL IN REVENUES OR INCREASED COSTS OF OPERATIONS COULD CAUSE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT IN OUR BUSINESS, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.

Because we have a limited operating history since our inception in December 9, 2002 and have not generated an revenue since our inception, and because the PC accessory industry is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product and service introductions, and changing customer demands, our costs may change dramatically over time which causes us to be unable to accurately forecast our revenues. For example, in the event that the cost to manufacture the Phantom Lapboard is higher than projected or our manufacturing costs increase dramatically, we may not be able to generate profit, which may cause us to go out of business.

We currently intend to increase our operating expenses substantially in order to, among other things:

·
Expand our current operating activities;

·
fund sales and marketing activities;

·
manufacture inventory; and

·
incur capital expenditures.

Our expense levels are based, in part, on our expectations with regard to potential future revenues, and to a large extent such expenses will be fixed, particularly in the short term. To the extent we are not successful in generating such revenues, we may be unable to appropriately adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall or will have to reduce our operating expenses, causing us to forego potential revenue-generating activities, either of which could cause us to go out of business. In addition, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment, we may from time to time make certain pricing or marketing decisions that may adversely affect our revenues. Retail sales revenue is also subject to seasonal fluctuations. These factors add to the difficulty in accurately forecasting revenue.

WE WILL DEPEND ON A LIMITED NUMBER OF THIRD PARTIES TO MANUFACTURE, DISTRIBUTE, AND SUPPLY CRITICAL COMPONENTS AND SERVICES FOR THE PHANTOM LAPBOARD. WE MAY BE UNABLE TO OPERATE OUR BUSINESS IF THESE PARTIES DO NOT PERFORM THEIR OBLIGATIONS.

As disclosed on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 19, 2006 and November 6, 2006, we have an agreement with Itron Technology, Inc., a third-party manufacturer, for the production of the Phantom Lapboard. We expect to rely on sole suppliers for a number of key components for the Phantom Lapboard. We will not control the time and resources that these third parties devote to our business. We cannot be certain that these parties will perform their obligations as expected or that any revenue, cost savings, or other benefits will be derived from the efforts of these parties. If any of these parties breaches or terminates its agreement with us or otherwise fails to perform their obligations in a timely manner, we may be delayed or prevented from commercializing our Phantom Lapboard. Because our relationships with these parties are expected to be non-exclusive, they may also support products and services that compete directly with us, or offer similar or greater support to our competitors. Any of these events could require us to undertake unforeseen additional responsibilities or devote additional resources to commercialize our Phantom Lapboard. This outcome would harm our ability to compete effectively and achieve increased market acceptance and brand recognition.

7

 
If our manufacturing relationships are not successful, we may be unable to satisfy demand for our Phantom Lapboard. The ability of our manufacturers to reach sufficient production volume of the Phantom Lapboard to satisfy anticipated demand is subject to delays and unforeseen problems such as defects, shortages of critical components and cost overruns.

Moreover, our manufacturers will require substantial lead times to produce anticipated quantities of the Phantom Lapboard. Delays, product shortages and other problems could impair our retail distribution and brand image and make it difficult for us to attract customers. In addition, the loss of a manufacturer would require us to identify and contract with alternative sources of manufacturing, which we may be unable to do and which could prove time-consuming and expensive.

WE EXPECT TO DISTRIBUTE THE PHANTOM LAPBOARD THROUGH RETAIL DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS; IF RETAILERS ARE NOT SUCCESSFUL OR ARE UNWILLING TO SELL OUR PRODUCTS, WE MAY BE UNABLE TO SELL TO SUCH BRICK AND MORTAR RETAIL CONSUMERS.

We may depend on retail distribution to sell the Phantom Lapboard. In the event that retailers are reluctant to sell our products or in the event that their proposed financial terms are unacceptable to us, we may be unable to sell to traditional brick and mortar retail consumers, which are defined as consumers who prefer to make game, game related accessory and computer accessory purchases from retailers having a physical presence accessible to the consumer. If we are unable to sell to traditional brick and mortar retail consumers, we may go out of business.

OUR PHANTOM LAPBOARD, WHILE COSTLY TO DEVELOP, MAY FAIL TO GAIN MARKET ACCEPTANCE, IN WHICH CASE WE MAY BE UNABLE TO OPERATE OUR BUSINESS.

Subject to availability of financing, we plan to invest a considerable amount of money and resources in the launch of our Phantom Lapboard. However, our Phantom Lapboard is unproven and may fail to gain market acceptance. Because the market for our Phantom Lapboard is evolving, it is difficult to predict the size of the market and its rate of growth, if any. We cannot assure you that the market for PC accessories will continue to develop or be sustainable. If the market for the Phantom Lapboard fails to develop, develops more slowly than expected or becomes more competitive than is currently expected, we may no be able to keep up and go out of business.

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO ANTICIPATE CHANGES IN CONSUMER DEMANDS, AND THEREFORE WE MAY NOT MAKE SALES AND COULD POTENTIALLY GO OUT OF BUSINESS.

We anticipate that the Phantom Lapboard will appeal primarily to children, teenagers and young adults, whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are subject to rapid change. Our success will depend on our ability to identify gaming and entertainment trends as well as to anticipate, interpret, and react to changing consumer demands in a timely manner.

If we misjudge the market for our Phantom Lapboard, we may not be successful in achieving meaningful revenue, which may lead us to go out of business.
 
8

 
WE WILL FACE COMPETITION FROM A NUMBER OF SOURCES, WHICH MAY IMPAIR OUR REVENUES, INCREASE OUR CUSTOMER ACQUISITION COST, AND HINDER OUR ABILITY TO GENERATE NEW CUSTOMERS.

While we are not aware of any direct competitors to our Phantom Lapboard, we will compete indirectly with a large number of hardware manufacturers, Internet sites, and other companies providing gaming and entertainment services. Our competitors may include hardware manufactures, Internet sites, and other companies providing gaming and entertainment accessories; vertical markets where competitors may have advantages in expertise, brand recognition, and other factors; and manufacturers of personal computers or game consoles who may develop their own accessories to which they would direct their customers.

Our competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than ours. In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to address the needs of our prospective customers. We cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully compete against current or future competitors. In order to compete effectively, we may need to expend significant internal engineering resources or acquire other technologies or companies to provide or enhance such capabilities. Any of these acts by our competition may increase our customer acquisition costs, which is, generally, the cost associated with acquiring a new customer, is calculated by dividing total acquisition expenses by total new customers. Any of these efforts will take resources we may not have, which may force us to go out of business.

WE DEPEND ON A NUMBER OF KEY PERSONNEL, AND THEIR LOSS MAY CAUSE US TO GO OUT OF BUSINESS.

Our success will depend upon our senior management and technical personnel, particularly Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer. The Company has an employment agreement with Mr. Koler, but such agreement does not mitigate the risk associated with the loss of Mr. Koler’s services. The loss of the services of Mr. Koler or other our senior management and technical personnel may cause us to go out of business. Our success also depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified technical, sales, marketing, customer support, financial and accounting, and managerial personnel. Competition for such personnel in the PC accessories industry can be intense, and we cannot be certain that we will be able to retain our key personnel or that we can attract, integrate or retain other highly qualified personnel in the future.

OUR SUCCESS WILL DEPEND ON OUR ABILITY TO SECURE AND PROTECT PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND OTHER PROPRIETARY RIGHTS.

Our success and ability to compete will be substantially dependent on our internally developed technologies and trademarks, which we plan to protect through a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark law. Our patent applications or trademark applications may not be approved. Even if they are approved, such patents or trademarks may be successfully challenged by others or invalidated. If our trademark registrations are not approved because third parties own such trademarks, our use of such trademarks will be restricted unless we enter into arrangements with such third parties that may be unavailable on commercially reasonable terms.

We generally enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and corporate partners, and generally control access to and distribution of our technologies, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use or disclosure, parties may attempt to disclose, obtain or use our solutions or technologies. The steps we have taken may not prevent misappropriation of our solutions or technologies, particularly in foreign countries where laws or law enforcement practices may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States.
 
9

 
We may license in the future elements of our trademarks, trade dress and similar proprietary rights to third parties. While we attempt to ensure that the quality of our brand is maintained by these business partners, such partners may take actions that could materially and adversely affect the value of our proprietary rights or our reputation. Our proprietary rights may not be viable or of value in the future since the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of certain proprietary rights is uncertain and still evolving.
 
THE COMPANY'S DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES AND ITS INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING WERE INEFFECTIVE THROUGH DECEMBER 2005 BECAUSE OF NOT PROPERLY ACCOUNTING FOR SUFFICIENT LOSS CONTINGENCY ACCRUALS TO COVER POSSIBLE MONETARY PENALTIES AND INTEREST RELATING TO OUR FAILURE TO FILE CERTAIN PAYROLL AND WITHHOLDING TAX RETURNS AND TO SATISFY REQUIRED WITHHOLDING AND PAYROLL TAX OBLIGATIONS. ALTHOUGH WE RESTATED OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN DECEMBER 2005, IF WE ARE UNABLE TO GENERALLY MAINTAIN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OUR DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES AND INTERNAL CONTROLS, WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE RELIABLE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WHICH WOULD MAKE ANY INVESTMENT IN OUR COMPANY SPECULATIVE AND RISKY.

As of December 31, 2006, our principal executive officer and interim principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting were ineffective, as of the end of the periods covered by such report, so as to insure that all of the information required to be reported in our periodic reports was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. This was concluded as we were unable to record and properly report sufficient loss contingency accruals to cover possible monetary penalties and interest relating to our failure to file certain payroll and withholding tax returns and to satisfy required withholding and payroll tax obligations. While management is focused on improving our company’s Disclosure Controls to ensure timely and proper reporting, there can be no assurance that other items do not currently exist, or will not occur in the future, that reflect ineffective Disclosure Controls as of the Evaluation Date. Management concluded that the failure to properly account for and disclose the sufficient loss contingency accruals to cover possible monetary penalties and interest relating to our failure to file certain payroll and withholding tax returns and to satisfy required withholding and payroll tax obligations, was a material weakness in our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting.

In connection with the evaluation referred to in the foregoing paragraph, we have identified no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Beginning in September 2005, the Company hired new staff to handle finance and legal matters as well as a new Chief Executive Officer but we are not able to confirm that the work performed by this staff improved any potential weaknesses in internal controls and the finance and legal employees were subsequently terminated in December 2006. The Company has not processed any payroll since December 2006 and intends to contract a company specializing in payroll processing to ensure any future payroll processed is fully and accurately reported and that all applicable payroll taxes are fully and accurately paid on a timely basis. The Company still maintains outside finance and legal consultants to assist where appropriate and when funding is available. With additional financing the Company will round out its staff in order to better comply with controls and procedures regulated under the Exchange Act. As a part of this process, the Company has reviewed its accounting treatment of certain convertible debt instruments under FAS 133 and EITF 00-19 and as a result has restated its financial statements from December 31, 2004 through March 31, 2006.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting. If we are unable to maintain the remedial actions we have undertaken and generally maintain the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls, so as to insure that all of the information required to be reported in our periodic reports was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms, we will not be able to provide reliable financial reports, our results of operations could be misstated and our reputation may be harmed. Accordingly, any investment by you in our company under these conditions could be speculative and risky.
 
RISKS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK

IF WE FAIL TO REMAIN CURRENT ON OUR REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, WE COULD BE REMOVED FROM THE OTC BULLETIN BOARD WHICH WOULD LIMIT THE ABILITY OF BROKER-DEALERS TO SELL OUR SECURITIES AND THE ABILITY OF STOCKHOLDERS TO SELL THEIR SECURITIES IN THE SECONDARY MARKET.
 
Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as us, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

10

 
THERE IS NO ASSURANCE OF AN ESTABLISHED PUBLIC TRADING MARKET IN OUR COMMON STOCK, WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ABILITY OF INVESTORS IN OUR COMPANY TO SELL THEIR SECURITIES IN THE PUBLIC MARKETS.
 
Although our common stock trades on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”), a regular trading market for the securities may not be sustained in the future. The NASD has enacted recent changes that limit quotations on the OTCBB to securities of issuers that are current in their reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The effect on the OTCBB of these rule changes and other proposed changes cannot be determined at this time. The OTCBB is an inter-dealer, Over-The-Counter market that provides significantly less liquidity than the NASD’s automated quotation system (the “NASDAQ Stock Market”). Quotes for stocks included on the OTCBB are not listed in the financial sections of newspapers as are those for The Nasdaq Stock Market. Therefore, prices for securities traded solely on the OTCBB may be difficult to obtain and holders of common stock may be unable to resell their securities at or near their original offering price or at any price. Market prices for our common stock will be influenced by a number of factors, including:
 
·                           the issuance of new equity securities;
 
·                           changes in interest rates;
 
·                          competitive developments, including announcements by competitors of new products or services or significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
 
·                           variations in quarterly operating results;
 
·                           change in financial estimates by securities analysts;
 
·                           the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;
 
·                           investor perceptions of our company and the technologies industries generally; and
 
·                           general economic and other national conditions.

THE LIMITED PRIOR PUBLIC MARKET AND TRADING MARKET MAY CAUSE VOLATILITY IN THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

Our common stock is currently traded on a limited basis on the OTCBB under the symbol “PHEI.OB” The quotation of our common stock on the OTCBB does not assure that a meaningful, consistent and liquid trading market currently exists, and in recent years such market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the market prices of many smaller companies like us. Our common stock is thus subject to volatility. In the absence of an active trading market:
 
·                           investors may have difficulty buying and selling or obtaining market quotations;
 
·                           market visibility for our common stock may be limited; and
 
·                           a lack of visibility for our common stock may have a depressive effect on the market for our common stock.

OUR COMMON STOCK IS SUBJECT TO THE "PENNY STOCK" RULES OF THE SEC AND THE TRADING MARKET IN OUR SECURITIES IS LIMITED, WHICH MAKES TRANSACTIONS IN OUR STOCK CUMBERSOME AND MAY REDUCE THE VALUE OF AN INVESTMENT IN OUR STOCK.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:
 
 
1.
that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks; and
 
 
2.
the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.
 
In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:
 
 
1.
obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
 
 
2.
make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
 
11

 
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:
 
 
1.
Sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
 
 
2.
that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.
 
Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
 
IF WE FAIL TO MAINTAIN EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING, THE PRICE OF OUR  COMMON STOCK MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. 

Our internal controls over financial reporting may have weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed, the disclosure of which may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. We are required to establish and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to establish those controls, or any failure of those controls once established, could adversely impact our public disclosures regarding our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, our management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting may identify weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal controls over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for investors. Any actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal controls over financial reporting, disclosure of our management’s assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting or disclosure of our public accounting firm’s attestation to or report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

UPON SUCH TIME AS OUR STOCK IS ACTIVELY TRADED, STANDARDS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 ARE UNCERTAIN, AND IF WE FAIL TO COMPLY IN A TIMELY MANNER, OUR BUSINESS COULD BE HARMED AND OUR STOCK PRICE COULD DECLINE.

Rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, and attestation of the assessment by our independent registered public accountants. The requirement of an annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting currently already applies to our company, and the attestation of the assessment by our independent registered public accountants will first apply to our annual report for fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The standards that must be met for management to assess the internal control over financial reporting as effective are new and complex, and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards. We may encounter problems or delays in completing activities necessary to make an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, the attestation process by our independent registered public accountants is new and we may encounter problems or delays in completing the implementation of any requested improvements and receiving an attestation of the assessment by our independent registered public accountants. If we cannot assess our internal control over financial reporting as effective, or our independent registered public accountants are unable to provide an unqualified attestation report on such assessment, investor confidence and share value may be negatively impacted.

WE HAVE NOT PAID CASH DIVIDENDS IN THE PAST AND DO NOT EXPECT TO PAY CASH DIVIDENDS IN THE FUTURE. ANY RETURN ON INVESTMENT MAY BE LIMITED TO THE VALUE OF OUR STOCK.
 
We have never paid cash dividends on our stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of cash dividends on our stock will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors affecting us at such time as the board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay cash dividends, our stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates
12

 
ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

 
ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beshara v. Infinium Labs Corporation, No. 2005 CA 005103 NC. In May 2005, Beshara sued us in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida, alleging default of a promissory note and seeking damages of approximately $1,400,000.00. On October 25, 2005, we settled accrued interest through October 31, 2005, together with reasonable attorneys’ fees, in the amount of $384,192 through issuance of 7,114,667 shares of our stock. On March 17, 2006, we entered into a conversion agreement with Beshara in order to reduce a portion of the outstanding principal and interest with 40,000,000 shares of common stock (as of May 22, 2006). In September 2006, the parties amended the promissory note to add for conversion of debt into equity. As of September 30, 2006, the remaining principal on the debt is approximately $986,449. So long as Beshara continues to convert debt into equity the foregoing action shall be abated.

Black Rocket Euro RSCG, LLC v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2005 CA 5008 NC. In May 2005, Black Rocket sued us in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida, alleging breach of contract and seeking damages in the amount of $95,272.00. Due to an administrative error, our attorney neglected to file a notice of appearance and on January 25, 2006, Black Rocket obtained a default judgment in the amount of $104,629. We have recorded $104,629 as well as $4,977 in accrued interest, as of September 30, 2006, in accounts payable.

CDW Corporation v. Infinium Labs Corporation, No. 05-M1-131484. In May 2005, CDW sued us in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, alleging that the Company placed orders for goods, failed to pay for such orders and thus breached the contract and seeking damages in the amount of $26,958. Due to financial constraints, we may not be able to replace local counsel. On February 7, 2006, the court entered judgment for $26,958 and we have recorded $27,932, including interest through September 30, 2006, in accounts payable.

GMR Marketing, LLC, v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 20050CA-10535NC. In January 2006, GMR sued us in the District Court of Florida, Sarasota County, alleging that it rendered advertising services and that the Company failed to pay for such services thereby breaching the contract. GMR sought damages in the amount of $107,544. Due to an error with our Florida counsel an answer to the complaint was not filed and on February 1, 2005 GMR received a default judgment in the amount of $107,883. Through September 30, 2006, the Company has recorded a total of $114,284, including interest, in accounts payable. On October 25, 2006, the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Company agreed to pay GMR $71,000 no later than December 20, 2006 in exchange for a full release of all previous claims.
 
Longview Special Finance, Inc. v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 06 CV 1772. In March 2006, Longview sued us in United States District in the Southern District of New York alleging breach of contract and requesting, in part, issuance of all remaining shares requested in prior conversion notices. The March complaint contained various errors. The parties entered into a negotiated settlement related to a portion of Longview’s claims on April 7, 2006. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company converted a portion of Longview’s requested conversion request and Longview agreed to dismiss the aforementioned matter in May 2006 and standstill on any further request for conversion or bring any additional claim on with respect to the Company’s failure to reserve adequate shares for Longview or deliver shares under a conversion. Although the Company has materially performed, Longview has not dismissed the action. In November 2006, Plaintiff submitted an amended complaint with similar claims and requested a hearing, currently scheduled for late November, on its request for an injunction.  The Company intends to respond vigorously to these claims and file counterclaims as well. On March 30, 2007, the Company and the Holders completed the settlement of the Action and entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of March 22, 2007 with the Holders pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 425,000,000 shares of free-trading common stock to the Holders in exchange for the Holders agreeing to enter into general releases and to petition the Court to dismiss the Action with prejudice. On March 30, 2007, the Court so ordered the adoption of the Agreement and general releases were executed and delivered by the parties. See Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007.

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 06-2-05618-3 SEA. In February 2005, we entered into a Stipulation and Order for Entry of Judgment with Merrill Lynch pertaining to our default in rent of $127,312 due under our lease with Merrill Lynch (for our former corporate headquarters). The foregoing matter was adjudicated in the Superior Court for the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In partial consideration of the entry of the judgment the lease, originally set to expire in August 2006, terminated on February 28, 2006 with no further monetary obligations. Subsequent to the entry of the order the parties entered into a settlement agreement that provided for a payment schedule of $5,000 per month with a final balloon payment due in July 2006. The Company intended on using proceeds from an SB-2 registration, but was unable to do so after the SB-2 was withdrawn on May 23, 2006. The Company was in default on the settlement agreement when it failed to make the balloon payment by July 31, 2006. In September 2006, Merrill Lynch assigned its rights to enforce the settlement agreement, and all other rights, to Fred Niedrich, a third party. On September 20, 2006, the parties entered into a new settlement agreement whereby the total debt due of $118,289 was settled for $100,000 pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
13


Morley and Campbell v. Timothy Roberts and Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. D-1-GN-06-000851. In April 2006, Morley and Campbell sued Timothy Roberts individually and the Company in the District Court, 200 Judicial District, Travis County, Texas for breach of contract in failing to perform the remainder of an Asset Purchase Agreement and Assignment of Rights between plaintiffs and Roberts. The total claim is for $30,000. Phantom is defending itself vigorously in this suit and has retained local counsel in order to do so. No contingency has been accrued as of September 30, 2006. As of the date of this Annual Report, the plaintiff has not pursued any further remedies, and the Company believes that the action has been dropped.

M. Tyler Boles v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. V06-30. In January 2006, M. Tyler Boles sued us in the General District Court for Nelson County, Delaware, alleging a claim for money and seeking damages in the amount of $1,200. A judgment was entered in March 2006 for $1,254 and we have recorded $1,300, including interest through September 30, 2006, in accounts payable.

Oracle USA, Inc. v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. C05-5049. In December 2005, Oracle USA sued us in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, alleging that the Company placed orders for software, failed to pay for such orders and thus breached the contract and seeking damages in the amount of $198,818. In March 2006 judgment was entered against the Company in the aforementioned court for $199,068 and, as of September 30, 2006, this amount has been recorded in accounts payable.

Ronald Westman v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2006 CA 010711 NC. In November 2006, Ronald Westman filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. The Company has not been served with the summons and complaint and, therefore, can not provide any further detail. 

SBI USA, LLC v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 05CC10694. In November 2005, SBI USA, LLC, sued us in the Superior Court of California, Orange County, alleging breach of contract and seeking damages in the amount of $58,000. Judgment was entered against the Company in the aforementioned court in April 2006 for $55,000 and we have recorded $59,213, including interest through September 30, 2006, in accounts payable.
 
Walter Dorwin Teague Associates v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 05-9-35846-2. In December 2005, Teague Associates entered an arbitration award in the Superior Court for King County, Washington. The judgment is for $51,843 and we have recorded $55,734, including interest through September 30, 2006, in accounts payable. Teague & Associates was retained in 2004 to assist and support various industrial design requirements associated with hardware for the Phantom Game Service. The Company defaulted on its payment obligations and this resulted in the associated arbitration award.

In the Matter of Certain Fax Blasts, SF-2926. In approximately January 2005, we received subpoenas for documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in an investigation entitled In the Matter of Certain Fax Blasts. In compliance with other SEC issued subpoenas, several former employees, including our Chairman of the Board of Directors, have given testimony to the SEC’s staff while several current employees have participated in off-record interviews with the SEC staff. 

Timothy M. Roberts, the Company's Chairman of the Board of Directors, received a “Wells Notice” from the SEC in 2005. The Wells Notice was received by Mr. Roberts in a personal capacity. This Wells Notice was issued in connection with the SEC’s investigation relating to “phony fax scams” in which several penny stocks, including ours, were promoted to potential investors and resulted in charges filed by the SEC against two stock promoters. Under the SEC's procedures, the Wells Notice indicates that the staff of the SEC intends to recommend that the SEC bring a civil enforcement action against Mr. Roberts alleging violations of federal securities laws. Recipients of Wells Notices have the opportunity to respond to the SEC staff before any formal recommendation is made.
 
14

 
In May 2006, Mr. Roberts, in his personal capacity, was served with a complaint from the SEC in the matter entitled Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Timothy M. Roberts in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, pursuant to which the SEC alleges that Mr. Roberts made false statements with regard to the Company’s prospects while at the same time selling his shares of the Company’s common stock for personal gain through his alleged participation in a “phony fax scam”. The SEC seeks judgment against Mr. Roberts enjoining him from future violations of securities laws, requiring that he disgorge any gain or benefit he received from past violations, and imposing penalties for the violations. Further, the SEC seeks a judgment prohibiting Mr. Roberts from serving in the future as an officer or director of a public company and from participating in any offering of “penny stocks”. While the Board of Directors has currently agreed to indemnify Mr. Roberts’ legal expenses specifically related to this matter, no accrual has been made as of September 30, 2006. On May 9, 2007, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to (i) fully indemnify Mr. Roberts against the nature of the action arising out of the SEC Complaint and (ii) enter into a settlement agreement whereby the total debt due of $2,062.50 was to be settled for the same amount pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933. On the same date, the Company entered into the aforementioned settlement agreement.

John Fife v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2006 CA 012309 NC. In December 2006, John Fife filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the total debt due of $166,000.00 was settled for the same amount pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Phantom Investors LLC v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2005 CA 001211 NC. In February 2005, Phantom Investors LLC filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Federal Insurance Company v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2006 CA 005201 NC. In June 2006, Federal Insurance Company filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this action.

The Motley Fool Inc. v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2006 CA 002132 NC. In March 2006, The Motley Fool Inc., filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Centerpointe Property LLC v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2006 CA 001216 NC. In February 2006, Centerpointe Property LLC filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Beshara Edward C v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2006 CA 000206 NC. In January 2006, Edward Beshara filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Beshara James v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2005 CA 011388 NC. In November 2005, James Beshara filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Beshara Edward C and Beshara Sharon M v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2005 CA 010933 NC. In November 2005, Edward Beshara and Sharon Beshara filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

GMR Marketing, LLC, v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 20050CA-010535 NC. In October 2005, GMR filed an action in the Circuit Court of Florida, Sarasota County.

Tops Staffing Services v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2005 CC 5829 NC. In 2005, Tops Staffing Services filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. On January 26, 2007, plaintiff obtained a Final Default Judgment against the Company.

John W. Anderson and Adam Goldblatt v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. In 2007, John W. Anderson and Adam Goldblatt filed an action in the Superior Court for Seattle County, Washington. On January 30, 2007, plaintiff obtained a Default Judgment against the Company for unpaid compensation and related damages in the aggregate amount of 106,109.19.

From time to time, we may become party to litigation or other legal proceedings that we consider to be a part of the ordinary course of our business. We may become involved in material legal proceedings in the future. 
ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on March 15, 2007 beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time, at Tampa Airport Marriott Hotel, Tampa International Airport, Tampa, FL.

There were present in person or by proxy 852,541,059 shares of common stock, of a total of 1,184,234,723 shares of common stock entitled to vote.

774,358,297 shares were voted in favor to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company from 1,200,000,000 shares to 2,400,000,000 shares.

828,300,885 shares were voted in favor of the appointment of Kempisty & Company as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.
 
15

PART II
ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market for Common Stock

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "PHEI.OB".

The following quotations reflect the high and low for our common stock based on inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions. The high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:
 
Quarter Ended
 
High
 
Low
 
12/31/06
 
$
0.01
 
$
0.003
 
09/30/06
 
$
0.01
 
$
0.009
06/31/06
 
$
0.03
 
$
0.009
03/31/06 
 
$
0.46
 
$
0.012
12/31/2005
 
$
0.04
 
$
0.001
 
09/30/2005
 
$
0.12
 
$
0.04
 
06/30/2005
 
$
0.28
 
$
0.09
 
03/31/2005
 
$
1.60
 
$
0.24
 

HOLDERS

As of March 21, 2007, we had approximately 350 holders of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of our common stock is Corporate Stock Transfer, Denver, Colorado, (303) 282-4800.

COMMON STOCK

We are authorized to issue up to 2,400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share. As of May 15, 2007, approximately 1,799,433,415 shares of our common stock are issued and outstanding.

Holders of the common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefore. Upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of our company, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets which are legally available for distribution after payment of all debts and other liabilities and liquidation preference of any outstanding common stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. The outstanding shares of common stock are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to stockholders in the foreseeable future. In addition, any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deem relevant.

Recent Unregistered Sales of Securities

The following unregistered securities have been issued by us since January 1, 2006 and have not been previously disclosed in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or in our Current Reports on Form 8-K:
 
16

 
On January 23, 2006, we issued 2,900,000 shares of common stock to a note payable holder for principal, accrued interest and related legal fees with a fair value of $41,760 ($0.0144 per share). We recognized a loss of $13,327on the settlement. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

On January 25, 2006, we completed a private placement pursuant to which we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Golden Gate Investors, Inc. (“Golden Gate”) dated as of January 24, 2006, as amended by that certain Addendum to Convertible Debenture, Warrant to Purchase Common Stock and Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 24, 2006, for the sale of (i) a $50,000 principal amount convertible debenture and (ii) a warrant to purchase 5,000,000 shares of our common stock. Golden Gate provided us with an aggregate of $130,000 in gross proceeds upon the execution of final definitive agreements.

The debenture bears interest at 5¼%, mature three years from the date of issuance, is convertible into our common stock, at Golden Gate’s option. The convertible debenture is convertible into the number of our shares of common stock equal to the dollar amount of the debenture being converted multiplied by 110, less the product of the conversion price multiplied by 100 times the dollar amount of the debenture being converted, which is divided by the conversion price. The conversion price for the convertible debenture is the lesser of (i) $0.10, (ii) eighty percent of the average of the three lowest volume weighted average prices during the twenty (20) trading days prior to the conversion or (iii) eighty percent of the volume weighted average price on the trading day prior to the conversion. Beginning in the first full month that the registration statement covering the shares of common stock underlying the debenture and warrant is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Golden Gate is obligated to convert at least 5%, but no more than 10%, of the face value of the debenture per calendar month into shares of our common stock, so long as the shares are available, registered and freely tradable. If Golden Gate converts more than 5% of the face value of the debenture in any calendar month, the excess over 5% shall be credited against the next month’s minimum conversion amount. In the event that Golden Gate does not convert at least 5% of the face value of the debenture in any calendar month, Golden Gate shall not be entitled to collect interest on the debenture for that month and shall not be entitled to receive shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the debenture, provided that we provide Golden Gate with written notice of such failure to convert the minimum monthly conversion amount. However, in the event that our volume weighted average price is less than $.01, we will have the option to prepay the debenture at 130% rather than have the debenture converted. If we elect to prepay the debenture, Golden Gate may withdraw its conversion notice.

In addition, beginning in the first full month that the registration statement covering the shares of common stock underlying the debenture and warrant is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Golden Gate is obligated to exercise the warrant concurrently with the submission of a conversion notice by Golden Gate with respect to the debenture, in the same percentage of the debenture being converted. If Golden Gate exercises more than 5% of the warrants in any calendar month, the excess over 5% shall be credited against the next month’s minimum exercise amount. In the event Golden Gate does not exercise the warrant concurrently with the conversion of the debenture, it shall not be entitled to receive shares of our common stock for the portion of the debenture being simultaneously converted. The warrant is exercisable into 5,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.09 per share. Accordingly, if all warrants are exercised by Golden Gate, we will receive $5,450,000 in proceeds.

On February 15, 2006, we issued 372,414 shares of common stock to a consultant with a fair market value of $5,400 ($.0145 per share).

On March 8, 2006, we issued an aggregate of 19,999,999 shares of common stock to certain of our debenture holders from our December 2004 Securities Purchase Agreement upon a partial conversion of their debentures. The fair market value was $153,080 ($0.07654 per share). We recognized a loss of $34,021 on these conversions.

On March 9, 2006, we issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $260,000 ($0.026 per share) to convert a portion of a note payable. On March 31, 2006, we issued 30,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $600,000 ($0.020 per share) to convert a portion of a note payable. On these transactions we recognized a combined loss of $223,174 on the conversions.

On March 10, 2006, we issued 2,195,905 shares of common to a vendor for settlement of claims and associated legal fees with a fair market value of $52,702 ($.024 per share). We recognized a gain of $2,673 on this settlement. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

On March 16, 2006, we issued 243,243 shares of common stock to a consultant with a fair market value of $4,500 ($.0185 per share).

On March 29, 2006, we issued 1,636,330 shares of common stock to a note payable holder in settlement of claims with a fair market value of $31,090 ($0.019 per share). We recognized a gain of $3,229 on this settlement. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

17

 
On May 10, 2006, we issued an aggregate of 15,000,000 shares of common stock to certain of our debenture holders from our December 2004 Securities Purchase Agreement upon a partial conversion of their debentures. The fair market value was $256,500 ($0.0171 per share) and no gain or loss was recognized on these conversions.

During October 2006, the Company issued 69,172,000 shares of common stock in partial settlement of principal and interest aggregating $315,535 ($0.0046 per share). Principal in the amount of $301,967 and interest in the amount of $13,568 was converted and no gain or loss was recognized.

During November 2006, the Company issued 49,728,000 shares of common stock in partial settlement of principal and interest aggregating $203,589 ($0.0041 per share). Principal in the amount of $199,751 and interest in the amount of $3,838 was converted and no gain or loss was recognized.

During November 2006, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock in full settlement of a note and accrued interest. The fair value was $102,000 ($0.0051 per share). Principal and interest in the amount of $102,158 was converted and a $158 gain was recognized.

During November 2006, the Company issued 19,940,582 shares of common stock in full settlement of a note and accrued interest. The fair value was $97,709 ($0.0049 per share) and no gain or loss was recognized.

During November 2006, the Company issued 1,849,568 shares of common stock in partial settlement of principal. Principal in the amount of $4,836 ($0.0026 per share) was converted and no gain or loss was recognized.

All of the above offerings and sales were deemed to be exempt under rule 506 of Regulation D and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The offerings and sales were made to a limited number of persons, all of whom were accredited investors, business associates of Phantom Entertainment, Inc., or executive officers of Phantom Entertainment, Inc., and transfer was restricted by Phantom Entertainment, Inc., in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In addition to representations by the above-referenced persons, we have made independent determinations that all of the above-referenced persons were accredited or sophisticated investors, and that they were capable of analyzing the merits and risks of their investment, and that they understood the speculative nature of their investment. Furthermore, all of the above-referenced persons were provided with access to our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
 
None.

Equity Compensation Plan Information
 
The following table set forth the information as of December 31, 2006 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance:
 
Plan Category
 
Number of Shares to
Be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
(a)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)
 
Number of Shares
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Shares
Reflected in
Column (a))
(c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity Compensation plans approved by stockholders
 
0
 
N/a
 
0
 
Equity Compensation plans not approved by stockholders
 
392,000,000
 
N/a
 
392,000,000
 
Total 
 
392,000,000
 
N/a
 
392,000,000
 

Our 2006 and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans
 
The purpose of each of our 2006 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -C and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -D is to help us retain executive and non-executive employees, consultants, professionals, and service providers who provide services to the Company in connection with, among other things, the Company's obligations as a publicly-held reporting company. In addition, we expect to benefit from the added interest that the awardees will have in our welfare as a result of their ownership or increased ownership of our common stock. The Board of Directors will select who will receive awards and the amount and nature of such awards.

18

 
Over the last two years, we have been able to hire executive and non-executive employees and engage consultants, professionals, and service providers by compensating them through the issuance of shares of our common stock. This afforded us the ability to utilize our cash, at a time when we were seeking out financing and working with our creditors with respect to restructuring outstanding obligations We believe that, for the foreseeable future, it is in our best interests to be able to continue to engage and compensate such persons through the payment of our shares of common stock.

Awards authorized under the each of our 2006 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -C and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -D consist of shares of our common stock. Such awards may be subject to forfeiture in the event of premature termination of engagement, failure to meet certain performance objectives, or other conditions, as may be determined by the Board of Directors.
 
Each of the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -C and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -D is administered by the Board of Directors. Subject to the express terms and conditions of the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans, the Board of Directors has full power to make Awards, to construe or interpret the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to it and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for its administration. Except as otherwise provided in the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans, the Board of Directors may also determine which persons shall be granted Awards, the nature of the Awards granted, the number of shares subject to Awards and the time at which Awards shall be made. Such determinations will be final and binding.

The only class of stock subject to an Award is common stock. We have an aggregate of 260,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans of which an aggregate of 260,000,000 are issued an outstanding. We have an aggregate of 132,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans of which an aggregate of 132,000,000 are issued an outstanding.

In the event that our outstanding shares of Common Stock are increased, decreased or changed or converted into other securities by reason of merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend or other change in our corporate structure affecting the stock, the number of shares that may be delivered under the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans and the number and/or the purchase price of shares subject to outstanding Awards under the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans may be adjusted at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors to the extent that the Board of Directors determines to be appropriate, provided, however, that the number of shares subject to any Awards will always be a whole number.

The 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans will expire ten years after their approval by the Board, but the Board of Directors may terminate the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans at any time prior to that date and Awards granted prior to such termination may extend beyond such date. Termination of the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans will not alter or impair, without the consent of the Awardee, any of the rights or obligations of any Award made under the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans.

Grant. The Board of Directors may, at its discretion, award shares of common stock to a recipient (the "Stock Awards"). The Stock Awards will be issued pursuant to an agreement between the Company and the Awardee. Each recipient of a Stock Award will be a stockholder and have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to such shares, including the right to vote and receive all dividends or other distributions made or paid with respect to such shares.

If the recipient of an Award ceases to be a consultant, professional or service provider for any reason, then the Award may be subject to forfeiture, as provided in the particular agreement, unless such forfeiture is waived by the Board of Directors when it, in its discretion, determines that such waiver is in our best interests.

In the event of a participant's retirement, permanent disability or death, or in cases of special circumstances, the Board of Directors may waive any or all of the remaining restrictions and limitations imposed under the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans with respect to any Awards.

Restrictions on Transferability. These Shares of stock may not be sold, exchanged, transferred, pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise disposed of until such time as any stated restrictions lapse. The Board of Directors, in its absolute discretion, may impose such restrictions on the transferability of the Awards granted in the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans as it deems appropriate. Any such restrictions shall be set forth in the Agreement with respect to such Awards and may be referred to on the certificates evidencing shares issued pursuant to any such Award. Shares of restricted stock will be evidenced by a certificate that bears a restrictive legend.
 
19

 
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

Some of the information in this Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate" and "continue," or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they:
 
 
·
discuss our future expectations;
 
·
contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial condition; and
·
state other "forward-looking" information.
 
We believe it is important to communicate our expectations. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or over which we have no control. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under "Risk Factors," "Business" and elsewhere in this prospectus. See "Risk Factors."

Overview

Phantom Entertainment has developed and is manufacturing and marketing the Phantom Lapboard, a combination wireless keyboard, laser mouse and hard surface that enables users to work or play games from any comfortable setting. After establishing sales and distribution of the Phantom Wireless Lapboard, we may seek to develop and market the Phantom Game Service, a video game delivery system designed to allow consumers to search, preview and play a large selection of video games on demand via a broadband Internet connection.

We have not yet generated any revenue from operations. We have entered into major, multi-product licensing agreements with Ione Technology Inc., a worldwide leading manufacturer and marketer of input devices, to manufacture and distribute the Phantom® Wireless Lapboard and Phantom® Wireless Laser Mouse under Ione’s brand name throughout Asia and through Ione’s distributors in the US and Europe in return for royalty and design fees. We anticipate we will begin to receive revenue from these agreements in the 4th quarter of 2007.

We have received a purchase order from Alienware® - the leading manufacturer of high-performance desktop, notebook, media center and professional systems - to manufacture and supply the Phantom® Wireless Lapboard and Phantom® Wireless Laser Mouse for Alienware’s Media Center PCs and its PC gear product line. We anticipate we will begin to receive revenue from Alienware in the 4th quarter of 2007.

We have entered a distribution and sales agreement with Global Marketing Partners to serve the E-Commerce and retail markets throughout the United States. The agreement will aggregate sales of the Phantom Wireless Lapboard through Global Marketing Partner’s distribution channel with Ingram Micro Inc. (NYSE: IM), the world's largest technology distributor and a leading technology sales, marketing and logistics company. We anticipate we will begin to receive revenue from this agreement in the 4th quarter of 2007.

We have entered a sales agreement with Westex Europe NV to serve the E-Commerce, retail and OEM industrial markets throughout Europe. Westex Europe NV, a sales organization for high technology products and solutions, will target original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), value-added resellers (VARS), systems builders and E- commerce retailers in Europe.

In August 2006, we launched a new website and online store to support the marketing and sales of the Phantom Lapboard. The website can be found at www.phantom.net. We have a backlog of online orders for the Phantom Lapboard. Credit card payments will not be charged until the Phantom Lapboard ships. We anticipate we will begin to receive revenue from online orders in the 4th quarter of 2007.

Our ability to generate revenue from the Phantom brand is dependent on our ability to successfully manufacture and market the Phantom Wireless Lapboard under Phantom’s brand name throughout North America and Europe. While we anticipate to launch sales and distribution of the Phantom Wireless Lapboard in September 2007, delays may occur and given our limited resources, we need immediate additional capital to manufacture the Phantom Wireless Lapboard as well as to fund general operations.

Currently our business activities are almost entirely dedicated to manufacturing and marketing of the Phantom Wireless Lapboard. The Phantom Wireless Lapboard includes wireless technology, ergonomic design, one-touch features, programmable keys and a wireless high performance 1200 dpi laser mouse. The Lapboard’s innovative design features a keyboard that rotates 360 degrees to accommodate left or right handed users and inclines on a 22 degree angle with a hard surface below for the Phantom Laser Mouse.

20

 
Plan of Operations

We have incurred recurring losses from operations since inception. Our loss from operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $4,454,583, as compared to our loss from operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 of $12,236,530. At December 31, 2006, we had a working capital deficit of $18,344,236 and accumulated net losses since inception of $73,550,242. In their report on our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, our independent auditors expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.


Purchase of property and equipment
 
$
990,467
 
 
     
Development costs (costs net applicable payables)
   
2,336,375
 
 
     
Advertising (expenses net applicable payables)
   
1,294,778
 
 
     
Salary expense (expense net shares issued for employee services and wages/taxes payable)
   
5,925,926
 
 
     
Consultants and professional fees (expenses net shares issued for services and applicable payables)
   
1,781,164
 
 
     
General and administrative (expenses net non cash expenses [i.e. depreciation] and applicable payables)
   
3,811,916
 
 
     
Cash repayments of notes payable
   
1,075,000
 
 
     
Cash interest payments
   
534,093
 
 
     
Total cash utilized
 
$
17,749,719
 
 
21

 
On June 30, 2006, the Company borrowed $100,000 under an 8% promissory note. The note was funded in three tranches: $20,000 (due upon mutual execution of the note), $35,000 (due twenty-one days after mutual execution), and $45,000 (due forty-two days after mutual execution). The note is due no later than two months following the final traunche (estimated at one hundred and two days after mutual execution of the note). The obligation to issue the collateral was conditioned upon prior written request of the note holder prior to the associated funding and the execution of an escrow agreement with the note holder’s attorney. The Company agreed to grant the note holder three certificates to collateralize the note of 4,000,000 shares, 7,000,000 shares, and 9,000,000 shares of common stock. The note holder has not made any requests to escrow the collateral and has not established the aforementioned escrow agreement and, accordingly, the collateral has not been presented. As additional consideration for the note, the Company agreed to (i) re-price certain pre-existing warrants, (ii) issue 1,357,800 new warrants, with a fair value of $13,952 (which has been recorded as a derivative with the initial amount treated as a discount to the note and amortized over the term of the note), to parties designated by the note holder and (iii) issue, subject to full performance of the funding obligations by note holder, to note holder an additional 10,000,000 new warrants with a fair value of $86.048 (which has been recorded as a derivative with the initial amount treated as a discount to the note and amortized over the term of the note) . The new warrants described herein and expire in five years from the effective grant date and have an exercise price of $.015 per share. On November 30, 2006, the entire amount of the note and accrued interest was converted at a per share price of $0.0051. The Company recognized a $158 gain on the conversion.

On January 25, 2006, the Company borrowed $50,000 under a three year 5.25% unsecured promissory note with 5,000,000 warrants attached at an exercise price of $1.09. Pursuant to the SEC’s request, the associated registration statement was withdrawn on May 23, 2006. Accordingly, we were unable to obtain an effective registration and, as of June 23, 2006, were in default under the terms of the note. The note holder has accelerated the note, including a $15,000 penalty, which are due immediately. The note holder has also requested repayment for prepaid warrants of $285,000, but the Company disputes the associated claims with respect to these funds. At September 30, 2006, the outstanding balance on the note including interest and the penalty is $66,526. The note, interest and penalty are in default.

On January 1, 2006, the Company converted to a promissory note $91,775, issued to Timothy Roberts, a Director, of related unpaid expense reimbursements incurred while Mr. Roberts was employed as a full-time employee. The note is unsecured and bears an 8% rate of interest. On October 24, 2006, the entire amount of the note and accrued interest was converted at a per share price of $0.0049. The Company recognized no gain or loss on the conversion.

At December 31, 2006, we were in default on payment of promissory notes with a principal amount of $2,242,276. Our outstanding debt for borrowed money has generally been provided on a short-term basis, bears interest at rates ranging from 8% to 17% and, in many cases, was accompanied by the grant of common stock or warrants to purchase common stock, which contributed to the costs of the financings. On December 7, 2006, the Company issued Original Issue Discount Secured Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $250,000 to John Fife, an accredited investor, in three equal denominations for an aggregate purchase price of $150,000. The Notes mature on January 6, 2007, March 7, 2007 and June 7, 2007, respectively. The Notes do not bear interest; provided, however, default interest equal to 18% per annum is payable to the Mr. Fife upon an event of default, as defined in the Notes. Upon at least five, but no more than 10 business days advanced written notice, the Company has the right to prepay all or part of any outstanding amounts under the Notes without penalty at any time prior to the respective maturity dates.  The Notes are secured by a Stock Pledge Agreement dated as of December 7, 2006 between the Company and the Mr. Fife, wherein the Company agreed to pledge 129,000,000 shares of common stock (the “Collateral”) as security for (i) the performance of the Company of its obligations under the Notes, and (ii) the performance by Timothy Roberts, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors, of his Guaranty delivered to the Holder on December 7, 2006. Pursuant to the Agreement, if on any weekly anniversary subsequent to the date of issuance of the Notes, the market value of the Collateral then held by in escrow does not equal or exceed 2.25 times the principal amount of the Notes, then the Pledgor shall deliver to the Holder, within 5 business days of such date, a certificate for additional Collateral equal to not less than 2.25 times the principal amount of the Notes. If the Company fails to deliver a certificate for additional Collateral to the Holder within 5 business days, the Company shall pay to the Holder, in cash, an amount equal to $250 per business day until such certificate is delivered.
 
As of December 31, 2006, we have recorded an aggregate of $5,924,900in debt discount, of which $5,924,900 was amortized as interest expense. 
 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We do not have sufficient cash to continue operations for the next 12 months and are in immediate need of additional capital to fund our plan of operation. Except as previously disclosed, we presently have no commitments for additional financing and may not be able to obtain such financing. To support our working capital needs pending receipt of sufficient financing, we are seeking to settle outstanding liabilities through issuance of equity, and anticipate continuing to grant common stock to fund payroll and certain other ongoing costs.

Unless and until we receive sufficient financing, we expect to continue to be forced to rely on issuances of common stock under similar arrangements in settlement of payroll and such other costs.
 
22

 
Issuances of equity will dilute existing stockholder’s ownership and will have a depressive effect on our stock price, which will result in greater dilution for subsequent equity issuances and further downward pressure on our stock price.

If we are unable to obtain additional financing as and when needed, we will need to scale back and/or reprioritize our planned operations, our assets may be foreclosed upon by secured lenders and we may be forced to cease operations completely.

Our development activities have been and continue to be constrained by shortages in working capital (see Plan of Operation for detailed use of equity investment and debt financing). As a result, we have experienced delays in bringing our Phantom Game Service to market, which in turn has triggered the need for additional efforts to address changing design and engineering standards, as well as the need for renegotiation of arrangements with game content providers as existing arrangements lapse in advance of commercial launch. Due to the foregoing factors, in the fourth quarter of 2005, we restructured our business and our resources to focus predominantly on the Phantom Lapboard. We have no agreements, or any formal plans, to bundle games or game subscriptions with the Phantom Lapboard.

Subject to obtaining sufficient financing, we anticipate focusing our efforts over the next 12 months on the following principal activities:

Completing Development of the Phantom Lapboard - The Phantom Lapboard was originally intended for retail launch in 2004 and its design was based upon that premise. We are currently in the process of revising and updating the hardware to take advantage of newer technology to ensure that the product is technically compelling and that we are able to have an adequate supply of components. This includes changes to the mouse optical subsystem to a newer laser mechanism allowing users to utilize the mouse on a wider variety of surfaces. Users may operate the Phantom Lapboard from a tabletop which often has a reflective surface. The laser mechanism provides much broader compatibility with this type of surface. The Company believes that utilizing more recent components allows it the opportunity to have an adequate supply, but in no way “ensures” that it will have this supply. Prototypes of the Lapboard will be issued in the 2nd quarter of 2007 to wholesale buyers in the North American and European markets to determine forecasts for manufacturing the Lapboard. Wholesale buyers will be utilized through the sales channels of Global Partners Inc. U.S. and Westex N.V for the European sales channels.

Completing Development of the Lapboard Distribution Network - Working with our partners, Integrated Network Cable of St. Louis, Missouri, to provide logistics, warehousing/distribution and fulfillment services to support the marketing of the Phantom Lapboard and ShowMeCables, the e-commerce marketing division of Integrated Network Cable, will provide its e-commerce shopping cart to support the marketing and sales of the Phantom Lapboard.

As a pre-cursor to the commercial launch of the Phantom Lapboard, we entered into a Product Development and Manufacturing Agreement and a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with Itron Technology, Inc. In the event of the loss of Itron, it would require us to identify and contract with alternate sources of manufacturing, which we may be unable to do and which could prove time-consuming and expensive. The use of any third party manufacturer, entails investing in pre-manufacturing activities, including the purchase of tooling and components, as well as ancillary operations around the manufacturing and distribution of the Phantom Lapboard such as logistics, service and support.

The commercial launch of the Phantom Lapboard will require investment in marketing and sales activities. We expect to sell these units direct to consumer. We may also secure distribution agreements with retail partners as well as promoting consumer awareness of the Phantom Lapboard through typical marketing channels: advertising, public relations, and in-store promotions.
 
23

 
Critical Accounting Policies

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

We believe that stock-based compensation is a critical accounting policy that affects our financial condition and results of operations. Statement of Financial Account Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation defines a fair-value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans and transactions in which an entity issues its equity instruments to acquire goods or services from non-employees, and encourages but does not require companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. We have chosen to continue to account for employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB No. 25”) and related interpretations.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R “Share-Based Payment”, which addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB 25, and instead, generally requires that such transactions be accounted and recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair value. SFAS No. 123R will be effective for small business issuers as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123R offers us alternative methods of adopting this standard. We have not yet determined which alternative method it will use. Depending upon the number and terms of options that may be granted in future periods, the implementation of this standard could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“ SFAS No. 142”), and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”), we review our non-amortizable long-lived assets, including intangible assets and goodwill for impairment annually, or sooner whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable. Other depreciable or amortizable assets are reviewed when indications of impairment exist. Upon such an occurrence, recoverability of these assets is determined as follows. For long-lived assets that are held for use, we compare the forecasted undiscounted net cash flows to the carrying amount. If the long-lived asset is determined to be unable to recover the carrying amount, then it is written down to fair value. For long-lived assets held for sale, assets are written down to fair value. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows, appraised values or management’s estimates, depending upon the nature or the assets. Intangibles with indefinite lives are tested by comparing their carrying amounts to fair value. Impairment within goodwill is tested using a two step method. The first step is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its book value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the unit is less than its book value, we then determines the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of the reporting unit’s net assets from the fair value of the reporting unit. If the book value of the goodwill is greater than its implied fair value, we write down goodwill to its implied fair value.

INCOME TAXES

Income taxes are provided for using the liability method whereby future tax assets and liabilities are recognized using current tax rates on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the respective tax basis of the assets and liabilities. The Company provides a valuation allowance on future tax assets when it is more likely than not, that such assets will not be realized.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Research costs are expensed as incurred. Development costs are also generally expensed as incurred unless such costs meet the criteria necessary for deferral and amortization. To qualify for deferral, the costs must related to a technically feasible, identifiable product that the Company intends to produce and market, there must be a clearly defined market for the product and Company must have the resources, or access to the resources, necessary to complete the development. The Company has not deferred any development costs to date.
 
DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

Estimating gains and losses from derivatives is one of our most critical accounting policies. This includes the gain / loss recognition   related to convertible debentures, which are convertible into the Company’s stock at the option of the note holders.   These derivatives require a periodic valuation of their fair value and a corresponding recognition of gain / loss and liabilities associated with such derivatives. The recognition of derivative liabilities related to the issuance of debt convertible into shares of common stock is applied first to the proceeds of such issuance, at the date of issuance, and the excess of derivative liabilities over the proceeds is recognized as a loss on derivatives in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Any subsequent increase or decrease in the fair value of the derivative liabilities is recognized as a gain / loss on derivatives.

24

 
Accounting for these instruments requires a determination of all of the embedded derivatives. Certain instruments may become derivatives once a Company is unable to assert it has enough authorized shares to satisfy conversion of all outstanding debt, warrants, options and all other stock obligations. Once identified, an estimate is made for the number of shares each derivative would convert into as of the date of valuation. Theses shares are then valued using a Black-Scholes model based on the assumptions around volatility along with the current stock price, conversion price, interest rate, dividend rate, and term to maturity. Once valued the amount is compared to the prior period with “gains / losses on derivatives” and related liability recorded in the current period. While we believe that the systems and procedures used by the Company do provide a sound basis for our estimates, actual results will differ from management’s estimates. The complexity of identifying and estimating derivative liabilities and corresponding gains / losses affects the amounts reported in our financial statements.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return (including a decision whether to file or not to file a return in a particular jurisdiction). The accounting provisions of FIN No.48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently assessing whether adoption of this Interpretation will have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which establishes a framework for reporting fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this standard on its financial statement.
ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our consolidated financial statements are included beginning on page F-1 immediately following the signature page to this Annual Report.
 
ITEM 8.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

On January 2, 2007, Webb & Company, P.A. (the "Former Accountant") was dismissed as the auditors for the Company. On January 3, 2007, the Company engaged Kempisty & Company (the "New Accountant"), as its independent certified public accountant. The Company's decision to engage the New Accountant was approved by its Board of Directors on January 2, 2007.

The reports of the Former Accountant on the financial statements of the Company for each of the two most recent fiscal years, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles for the two most recent fiscal years and all subsequent interim periods, except that the Former Accountant's opinion in its report on the Company's financial statements expressed substantial doubt with respect to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for the last two fiscal years.

During the Company's two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through the date of dismissal, there were no reportable events as the term described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-B.

During the Company's two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through the date of dismissal, there were no disagreements with the Former Accountant on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of the Former Accountant, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports on these financial statements for those periods.

The Company did not consult with the New Accountant regarding the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and no written or oral advice was provided by the New Accountant that was a factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issues.
25

 
Item 8A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15, as of December 31, 2006, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer also concluded that, as of December 31, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures were [not] effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Through the filing of our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended 2006, our Disclosure Controls were not effective in enabling us to record and properly report embedded conversion features and freestanding warrants pursuant to SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" and EITF 00-19 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock.” As such, in September 2006, the Company restated its 10-KSB for the years ended 2004 and 2005, all quarterly periods in 2005, and for the period ending March 31, 2006. The unaudited financial statements included on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 reflect the correct accounting treatment for transactions suggesting treatment under EITF 05-04 and 00-19. 

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the relationship between the benefit of desired controls and procedures and the cost of implementing new controls and procedures. 

(b) Changes in Internal Controls

During the year ended December 31, 2006, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

Item 8A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Not applicable.
Item 8B.  OTHER INFORMATION

None.
PART III
ITEM 9.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, CONTROL PERSONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

The following table sets forth the names and ages of our executive officers and directors as of December 31, 2006.
 
Name
 
Age
 
Position
 
Director Since
Greg Koler
 
50
 
Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
2006
Richard Angelotti
 
62
 
Director
 
2004
Timothy Roberts
 
36
 
Chairman of the Board of Directors
 
2004

The principal occupations for the past five years (and, in some instances, for prior years) of each of our directors and executive officers are as follows:

26

 
Greg Koler, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer; Director.

GREG KOLER was, from January 2000 to December 2003, general manager at Infomedia S.A., Luxembourg, a European subsidiary of Gemstar TV Guide International, Inc., where he was responsible for five sales business units in Europe of the US parent company. Prior to that, from April 1997 until he joined Infomedia, Mr. Koler served as strategic sales director for TDK Recording Media Europe, a global publisher of entertainment software for consoles and PCs. Prior to joining Infinium in June 2004, and since December 2003, Mr. Koler served as a consultant to a number of companies including Softbank Broadband, FTC Communication Technologies and Vox Mobile Communications.

Richard Angelotti, Director.

RICHARD ANGELOTTI was a director of our predecessor, Infinium Labs Operating Corporation, since its formation and has been a member of our board of directors since the merger. Mr. Angelotti has been the CEO of Angelotti & Rosenberg Financial Group from March 2004 through the present. Mr. Angelotti served as the Principal of Global Financial Asset Management from August 2003 through February 2004 and was a Senior Vice President of Morgan Keegan from February 1999 through August 2003. He has over 12 years of experience as a financial advisor, and has held executive positions for major investment firms such as Northern Trust Bank of Sarasota, Bank of Boston in Florida, UBS Paine Webber, and Morgan Keegan. Mr. Angelotti holds Series 6, 7, 63, 65 Insurance and Annuity licenses.

Timothy Roberts, Chairman of the Board of Directors.

TIMOTHY M. ROBERTS was the founder of our predecessor, Infinium Labs Operating Corporation, and has been our Chairman and a member of our board of directors since the merger of our subsidiary into Infinium Labs Operating Corporation. He was also the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer from inception through August 15, 2005. Prior to founding Phantom Entertainment in December 2002, Mr. Roberts was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for Broadband Investment Group from 1999 through 2000. Broadband Investment Group was a holding company which owned a portfolio of service companies which handled technology layers 1-7. Prior to that, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for Intira Corporation from 1997 through 1999 of which Mr. Roberts was a co-founder, which provided network-based computing and communication services on an outsourced basis for its customers. Mr. Roberts was also a co-founder of broadband services provider Savvis Communications (NASDAQ SVVS). Mr. Roberts co-founded Savvis in 1995 and left Savvis 2 years later to start Intira Corporation.
  
Key Employees
 
TERRANCE TAYLOR From November 2003, to June 2004, Mr. Taylor served as Controller and Acting Chief Financial Officer of Phantom Entertainment, Inc., and as Controller of its predecessor, Infinium Labs Operating Corporation. From June 1999 to November 2003, Mr. Taylor served as controller at Wireless One Network, a cellular telephone operator in southwest Florida that was acquired by AT&T. From April 1998 to May 1999, Mr. Taylor served as Chief Financial Officer of Abaris Care, Inc., which operated 18 assisted living communities.

FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS

There are no family relationships among our executive officers and directors.
 
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Our Board of Directors is responsible for establishing broad corporate policies and for overseeing our overall management. In addition to considering various matters which require Board approval, the Board provides advice and counsel to, and ultimately monitors the performance of, our senior management.

The Board and our management strive to perform and fulfill their respective duties and obligations in a responsible and ethical manner. The Board performs annual self-evaluations. We have adopted a comprehensive Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all directors, officers and employees.

During 2006, the Board of Directors met seven times. To the extent that a nominee was a member of the Board of Directors in 2006, each nominee for director attended 100% of the Board of Directors meetings. While we do not have a formal policy requiring members of the Board to attend the Special Meeting of Stockholders, we strongly encourage all directors to attend.

Committees of the Board

As of the date of this Annual Report, we do not have any committees within our board of directors. To date, none of our Directors is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 401(e) of Regulation S-B. The Company lacks the financial resources to form audit and nominating committees. Notwithstanding, the Company is seeking to add new outside directors including a financial expert, as defined by Item 401(e) of Regulation S-B. 

27

 

Directors may receive, on an annual basis, common stock as awarded by our Board of Directors in consultation with the compensation committee.
 
Our Board of Directors may award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on our behalf other than services ordinarily required of a director. Other than indicated herein, no director received and/or accrued any compensation for his services as a director, including committee participation and/or special assignments.
 
There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors.
 
Other than the management agreements and the advisory agreements discussed herein, we presently have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of change in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of our company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(e) during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2006, our executive officers, directors and all persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.
 
CODE OF ETHICS

Our Company’s board of directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Compliance Program that applies to, among other persons, our Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (being our principal executive officer), our Company’s Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting officer, as well as persons performing similar functions. As adopted, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

 
(1)
honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

 
(2)
full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by us;

 
(3)
compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

 
(4)
the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and

 
(5)
accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires, among other things, that all of our Company’s personnel shall be accorded full access to our Chief Financial Officer with respect to any matter which may arise relating to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Further, all of our Company’s personnel are to be accorded full access to our Company’s Audit Committee if any such matter involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by the Chief Financial Officer or by any person who would be considered an “insider” for the purposes of our Company’s Insider Trading Compliance Policy by virtue of such person’s relationship to the Chief Financial Officer.
 
28

 
In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics emphasizes that all employees, and particularly managers and/or supervisors, have a responsibility for maintaining financial integrity within our Company, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, and federal, provincial and state securities laws. Any employee who becomes aware of any incidents involving financial or accounting manipulation or other irregularities, whether by witnessing the incident or being told of it, must report it to his or her immediate supervisor or to our Company’s Chief Financial Officer. If the incident involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by the Chief Financial Officer, the incident must be reported to any member of our Company’s Audit Committee. Any failure to report such inappropriate or irregular conduct of others is to be treated as a severe disciplinary matter. It is against our Company policy to retaliate against any individual who reports in good faith the violation or potential violation of our Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by another.

Terms of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of the holders of our Common Stock or until removed from office in accordance with our by-laws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by our board of directors.
ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the cash compensation (including cash bonuses) paid or accrued and equity awards granted by us for years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 to our Chief Executive Officer and our most highly compensated officers other than the Chief Executive Officer.
 
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
 
Name & Principal
Position
Year
Salary ($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards($)
Option Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
Change in
Pension Value
and Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total ($)
Timothy M. Roberts Chairman, Chief
2006
$327,000
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
$327,000
Executive Officer and Director(1)
2005
$142,594  2
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
 
$142,594
Greg Koler Chief Executive Officer
2006
$250,000  3
Nil
$45,716 *
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
$295,716
and Interim Chief Financial Officer(5)
2005
$29,487  6
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
$29,487
Kevin Bachus Former President and
2006
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Former Chief Operating Officer(7)
2005
$158,050  8
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
$158,050
Richard S. Skoba Former Executive (9)
2006
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Vice President of Sales
2005
$136,896  10
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
$136,896
Tyrol Graham Former Vice President
2006
$34,732
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
$34,732
Development (11)
2005
$217,333  12
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
$217,333
 
29


 * Amount represented stock-based compensation expense for fiscal year 2006 for awards of stock granted in 2006 under SFAS 123 R as discussed in Note 1(M), “Stock-Based Compensation” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
1
Resigned as an officer of our company on August 15, 2005.
2
Includes 1,382,298 shares of S-8 stock issued in lieu of cash compensation.
3
Includes 30,000,000 shares of S-8 stock issued in lieu of cash compensation. $146,200 of this amount is currently payable but has been deferred.
4
Includes 500,000 shares of S-8 stock issued in lieu of cash compensation.
5
Appointed as an officer and director of our company on November 18, 2005.
6
For his role as a director and officer Mr. Koler was compensated solely in cash.
7
Resigned as an officer and director of our company on November 17, 2005.
8
Includes 1,212,960 shares of S-8 stock issued in lieu of cash compensation.
9
Resigned from our company on April 30, 2005.
10
includes 1,722,598 shares of S-8 stock issued in lieu of cash compensation.
11
Resigned from our company on February 24, 2006.
12
includes 4,719,739 shares of S-8 stock issued in lieu of cash compensation.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information with respect to grants of options to purchase our common stock to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
 
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
($)
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
 
Director Compensation

The following table sets forth with respect to the named director, compensation information inclusive of equity awards and payments made in the year end December 31, 2006.
 
Name
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
($)
Option
Awards ($)
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation ($)
Change in Pension Value and
Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Greg Koler
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Timothy Roberts
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Richard Angelotti
$69,333 (1)
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
$69,333

1
The entire $69,333 is currently payable but has been deferred.

Employment Agreements

As disclosed on Form 8-K which was filed on August 19, 2005, the Company entered into a Separation and Release Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Timothy Roberts pursuant to which Mr. Roberts resigned as the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, effective as of August 15, 2005. Mr. Roberts remained a Director of the Company.

Mr. Roberts agreed to release and forever discharge the Company from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, claims for relief, and damages, of whatever kind or nature, known or unknown, which Mr. Roberts had, now has or may hereinafter have from the beginning of the world to the date of the Agreement, including, without limitation, all claims and all rights which Mr. Roberts may have under any and all federal, state and local laws and statutes which regulate employment, and the laws of contracts, tort and other subjects.

30

 
The Agreement provided for vesting of options to purchase 10,000,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share which were granted to Mr. Roberts pursuant to his employment agreement, partial cash severance payment to Mr. Roberts in an amount equal to $250,000 in 12 equal monthly installments, commencing September 1, 2005, and in lieu of the balance of the cash severance payment, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock (exempt pursuant to the provisions of Regulation D, as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended).

The Agreement was modified effective January 1, 2006 in which Mr. Roberts waived the aforementioned options as well as the $250,000 in cash severance.

On January 11, 2006, we entered into an Employment Agreement with Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, we will employ Mr. Koler commencing January 11, 2006 and his employment will be at-will. Mr. Koler will be paid an annual base salary of $250,000 (the “Base Salary”). In addition, on a quarterly basis, Mr. Koler will be eligible to earn a bonus of up to 35% of Base Salary based on meeting performance objectives and bonus criteria. In addition, Mr. Koler shall be entitled to receive the pro-rata amount of Base Salary due from November 18, 2005 through the January 10, 2006, as compensation for Mr. Koler’s role as our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer beginning on November 18, 2005.

Mr. Koler will be granted an aggregate of 5,000,000 restricted shares of our common stock, in accordance with the following vesting schedule: (i) 1,000,000 shares will be fully vested upon execution of the Employment Agreement, and the Stock Vesting Agreement dated as of January 11, 2006; and (ii) the remaining 4,000,000 shares of common stock shall vest quarterly over two years, 1/8 per quarter, to the extent Mr. Koler is employed with us at the pertinent vesting date and that our shareholders have authorized additional common stock. As of February 7, 2006, no shares under this agreement have been issued.

In addition, on January 11, 2006 we entered into a Confidential Information, Inventions, Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition Agreement with Mr. Koler. The non-competition and non-solicitation provisions shall remain in effect for two years following termination while the balance of this agreement survives any termination, subject to standard exceptions.

On December 6, 2006 the Company entered into an employment agreement with Terrance Taylor, its Controller. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, the Company will employ Mr. Taylor as its Treasurer and Controller for a period of 1 year commencing December 6, 2006, which will be automatically renewed for successive 1 year periods until written notice not to renew is delivered by either the Company or Mr. Taylor. Mr. Taylor will be paid an annual base salary of $150,000 (“Base Salary”). In addition, Mr. Taylor will be eligible to earn an annual cash bonus of up to $37,500 based on meeting performance objectives and bonus criteria. On April 17, 2007 the Company’s Board of Directors removed Mr. Taylor from his role as the Company’s Treasurer and, since that time, Mr. Taylor only serves in the capacity of the Company’s Controller.

Other Compensation

There are no annuity, pension or retirement benefits proposed to be paid to officers, directors, or employees of our company in the event of retirement at normal retirement date as there was no existing plan as of December 31, 2006 provided for or contributed to by our company.
 
ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information as to the shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of May 15, 2007 by (i) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; (ii) each director and nominee for director; (iii) each executive officer; and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes following the table, the persons as to whom the information is given had sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person shown is c/o Phantom Entertainment, Inc., 222 Grace Church St., Suite 302, Port Chester, NY 10573.

31

 
Principal Stockholders
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner
 
Amount Beneficially Owned (1)
 
Percent of
Class (1)
Timothy M. Roberts
 
0
 
*
Greg Koler
 
29,000,000
 
1.61%
Richard Angelotti
 
28,291,182
 
1.57%
Golden Gate Investors, Inc. (2)
 
179,763,398
 
9.99%
All Officers and Directors as a group (3 persons)
 
57,291,182
 
3.18%


 
*Less than one percent.

(1) Based on 1,799,433,415 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of May 15, 2007. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Except as otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners of the common stock listed above, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and voting power with respect to such shares, subject to community property laws where applicable.

(2) Includes shares underlying debentures and common stock purchase warrants. In accordance with rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Norman Lizt may be deemed a control person of the shares owned by Golden Gate.

Equity Compensation Plan Information
 
The following table set forth the information as of December 31, 2006 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance:
 
Plan Category
 
Number of Shares to
Be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
(a)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)
 
Number of Shares
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Shares
Reflected in
Column (a))
(c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity Compensation plans approved by stockholders
 
0
 
N/a
 
0
 
Equity Compensation plans not approved by stockholders
 
392,000,000
 
N/a
 
392,000,000
 
Total 
 
392,000,000
 
N/a
 
392,000,000
 

Our 2006 and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans
 
The purpose of each of our 2006 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -C and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -D is to help us retain executive and non-executive employees, consultants, professionals, and service providers who provide services to the Company in connection with, among other things, the Company's obligations as a publicly-held reporting company. In addition, we expect to benefit from the added interest that the awardees will have in our welfare as a result of their ownership or increased ownership of our common stock. The Board of Directors will select who will receive awards and the amount and nature of such awards.

Over the last two years, we have been able to hire executive and non-executive employees and engage consultants, professionals, and service providers by compensating them through the issuance of shares of our common stock. This afforded us the ability to utilize our cash, at a time when we were seeking out financing and working with our creditors with respect to restructuring outstanding obligations We believe that, for the foreseeable future, it is in our best interests to be able to continue to engage and compensate such persons through the payment of our shares of common stock.

Awards authorized under the each of our 2006 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -C and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -D consist of shares of our common stock. Such awards may be subject to forfeiture in the event of premature termination of engagement, failure to meet certain performance objectives, or other conditions, as may be determined by the Board of Directors.
 
32

 
Each of the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -C and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans-A through -D is administered by the Board of Directors. Subject to the express terms and conditions of the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and 2005 Stock Compensation Plans, the Board of Directors has full power to make Awards, to construe or interpret the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to it and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for its administration. Except as otherwise provided in the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans, the Board of Directors may also determine which persons shall be granted Awards, the nature of the Awards granted, the number of shares subject to Awards and the time at which Awards shall be made. Such determinations will be final and binding.

The only class of stock subject to an Award is common stock. We have an aggregate of 260,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans of which an aggregate of 260,000,000 are issued an outstanding. We have an aggregate of 132,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans of which an aggregate of 132,000,000 are issued an outstanding.

In the event that our outstanding shares of Common Stock are increased, decreased or changed or converted into other securities by reason of merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend or other change in our corporate structure affecting the stock, the number of shares that may be delivered under the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans and the number and/or the purchase price of shares subject to outstanding Awards under the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans may be adjusted at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors to the extent that the Board of Directors determines to be appropriate, provided, however, that the number of shares subject to any Awards will always be a whole number.

The 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans will expire ten years after their approval by the Board, but the Board of Directors may terminate the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans at any time prior to that date and Awards granted prior to such termination may extend beyond such date. Termination of the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans will not alter or impair, without the consent of the Awardee, any of the rights or obligations of any Award made under the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans.

Grant. The Board of Directors may, at its discretion, award shares of common stock to a recipient (the "Stock Awards"). The Stock Awards will be issued pursuant to an agreement between the Company and the Awardee. Each recipient of a Stock Award will be a stockholder and have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to such shares, including the right to vote and receive all dividends or other distributions made or paid with respect to such shares.

If the recipient of an Award ceases to be a consultant, professional or service provider for any reason, then the Award may be subject to forfeiture, as provided in the particular agreement, unless such forfeiture is waived by the Board of Directors when it, in its discretion, determines that such waiver is in our best interests.

In the event of a participant's retirement, permanent disability or death, or in cases of special circumstances, the Board of Directors may waive any or all of the remaining restrictions and limitations imposed under the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans with respect to any Awards.

Restrictions on Transferability. These Shares of stock may not be sold, exchanged, transferred, pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise disposed of until such time as any stated restrictions lapse. The Board of Directors, in its absolute discretion, may impose such restrictions on the transferability of the Awards granted in the 2006 Stock Compensation Plans and the 2005 Stock Compensation Plans as it deems appropriate. Any such restrictions shall be set forth in the Agreement with respect to such Awards and may be referred to on the certificates evidencing shares issued pursuant to any such Award. Shares of restricted stock will be evidenced by a certificate that bears a restrictive legend.
 

Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons 

Other than as set forth below, during the last two fiscal years there have not been any relationships, transactions, or proposed transactions to which we were or are to be a party, in which any of the directors, officers, or 5% or greater shareholders (or any immediate family thereof) had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest.

On January 5, 2004, our wholly owned subsidiary merged with and into Infinium Labs Operating Corporation, with Infinium Labs Operating Corporation surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary. In connection with such merger, Timothy M. Roberts, our former Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors, received 36,199,220 shares of our common stock as merger consideration based on the shares he owned in Infinium Labs Operating Corporation immediately prior to the merger. Also in connection with the merger, Mr. Roberts' mother, sister and brother received, respectively, 3,141,660, 31,400 and 31,400 shares of our common stock as merger consideration.

33

 
On June 21, 2004, we compensated Timothy M. Roberts, our former Chief Executive Officer $50,000 as consideration for his personal guaranty at that time of a commercial promissory note payable secured by a real estate mortgage encumbering the his residence. The note is for $1,500,000 with interest calculated at fifteen percent (15%) per annum up to the maximum amount allowed by law in the event of default. The note also permits a late charge in the amount of five percent (5%).

On July 28, 2004, we issued Richard Angelotti, a director, 800,000 shares of common stock as consideration for his personal guaranty of a promissory note payable secured by a real estate mortgage encumbering the director's residence. The note, effective on July 28, 2004 and expiring on July 27, 2005, was payable to Stephen A. Witzer, Trustee U/A dated February 7, 1985. The principal is for $500,000 with interest calculated at fifteen percent (15%) per annum, plus a five percent (5%) penalty, if applicable, for any late payment. In the event of an uncured default, the interest increases to eighteen percent (18%) per annum. On December 9, 2005, this promissory note was assigned by Witzer to Richard Angelotti. The terms of the promissory note were subsequently amended to provide that as of November 1, 2005, principal and accrued interest totaled $560,437. With respect to the revised principal, commencing November 2, 2005, simple interest at a rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum will accrue on a monthly basis until December 31, 2006 (maturity date), at which time the entire remaining principal and all accrued and unpaid interest are due in full. On August 4, 2006, the Company issued 41,659,182 shares of common stock with a fair value of $624,887.73 ($.015 per share) to convert a promissory note held by Richard Angelotti, a Director, and accrued interest. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion.

On November 2, 2004, we issued 200,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $43,735 ($0.2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer.

On November 2, 2004, we issued 300,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $65,603 ($0.2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Timothy Roberts, as CEO (Mr. Roberts was also the CFO and Chairman).

On December 8, 2004, we issued 300,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $65,603 ($0. 2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer.
 
On December 8, 2004, we issued 200,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $43,735 ($0. 2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Timothy Roberts, as CEO (Mr. Roberts was also the CFO and Chairman).

On December 8, 2004, we issued 100,000 shares of common stock with a fair market value of $21,866 ($0. 2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Richard Angelotti, Director.

On January 27, 2005, we borrowed $300,000 from Timothy Roberts, our former CEO and a director of our company, under a 15% promissory note, which was payable no later than April 27, 2005. The note was subsequently transferred by Mr. Roberts to parties unaffiliated with us. On or about May 10 through 12, 2005, this note was assigned by Mr. Roberts to the following individuals with corresponding amounts: (1) Gerard D'Ariano, $100,000; (2) Fred Niedrich, $50,000; (3) Gary Fears, $50,000; and (4) John Landino, $100,000.In June 2005, the full principal and interest was settled in consideration for our issuance of 3,187,206 shares of common stock to the holders, valued at $318,721.
 
On March 11, 2005, we issued 800,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $272,000 ($.34 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Richard Angelotti, Director.
 
On May 10, 2005, we issued 250,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $37,500 ($0.15 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer.

On June 3, 2005, we issued 250,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $25,000 ($0.10 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer.

On June 13, 2005, we issued 1,700,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $221,000 ($0.13 per share) to Timothy Roberts. These shares were an indemnification to Mr. Roberts as the guarantor on a $400,000, 6% promissory note between the Company and Nite Capital. The note was collateralized with Mr. Roberts’ personal holdings of Company stock.

On June 22, 2005, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $50,000 ($0.10 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Timothy Roberts, as our CEO (Mr. Roberts was also the CFO and Chairman).

On August 11, 2005, we issued 882,398 shares of common stock with a fair value of $61,768 ($0.07 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Timothy Roberts, as our CEO (Mr. Roberts was also the CFO and Chairman).

On August 11, 2005, we issued 712,960 shares of common stock with a fair value of $49,907 ($0.07 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Bachus became CEO, CFO and a Director on August 15, 2005.

34

 
On August 11, 2005, we issued 296,297 shares of common stock with a fair value of $20,741 ($0.07 per share) to Richard Angelotti, Director.

On August 18, 2005, we issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock to Richard Angelotti, with a fair value of $350,000 ($0.07 per share).

On August 18, 2005, we issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Timothy M. Roberts, our former Chief Executive Officer, with a fair value of $700,000 ($0.07 per share).

On January 1, 2006, the Company converted $91,775 owed under employee expense reimbursements into a promissory note to Timothy Roberts, a former employee, and the current Chairman and a Director. The note is unsecured and bears an 8% rate of interest. During November 2006, the Company issued 19,940,582 shares of common stock in full settlement of the promissory note and accrued interest. The fair value was $97,709 ($0.0049 per share) and no gain or loss was recognized.

On January 11, 2006, Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer, was granted 1,000,000 shares of common stock under the terms of his employment agreement. As of December 31, 2006, such shares have not been issued.
 
On February 14, 2006, the company issued Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer, 1,021,239 of common stock with a fair market value of $18,382 ($.018 per share) for services performed by Mr. Koler, prior to November 18, 2005, in his capacity as an independent contractor prior to becoming the CEO.

On July 26, 2006, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $330,000 ($.0165 per share) to Timothy Roberts, Chairman, for consulting services rendered in 2006 and to be rendered for the balance of 2006.

On November 9, 2006, we issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $66,000 ($0.0033 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer.

On November 17, 2006, we issued 9,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $34,200 ($0.0038 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer.

On November 21, 2006, we issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $3,600 ($0.0036 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer.

Transactions with Promoter

Immediately prior to the merger described above, Peter Goldstein, the promoter of Global Business Resources, Inc., surrendered to us 10,000,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of our wholly-owned subsidiary Global Business Resources, Inc., a Florida corporation. The operations of such subsidiary were not material to us and were not desired to be retained following the merger .

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
 
We believe that the terms of all of the above transactions are commercially reasonable and no less favorable to us than we could have obtained from an unaffiliated third party on an arm’s length basis. Our policy requires that all related parties recuse themselves from negotiating and voting on behalf of our company in connection with related party transactions.

Parents

Not applicable

35

 
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS
 
Exhibit #
Exhibit Name
 
 
3.1
Certificate of Incorporation ( Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 3.0 to Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-67990) filed with the SEC on August 20, 2001 ).
 
 
3.2
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 ).
 
 
3.3
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation ( Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 ).
 
 
3.4
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Definitive 14-A filed with the SEC on June 6, 2006)
   
3.5  
Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 ).
 
 
4.1
Company’s 2006 Executive Compensation Plan - A (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 9, 2006).
   
4.2
Company’s 2006 Employee Compensation Plan C (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 9, 2006).
   
 
36


10.1+
Employment agreement between the Company and Greg Koler dated January 11, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 13, 2006).
 
 
10.2
Stockholder vesting agreement between the Company and Greg Koler dated January 11, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 13, 2006).
 
 
10.3
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 24, 2006 by and between Infinium Labs, Inc. and Golden Gate Investors, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006).
 
 
10.4
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of January 24, 2006 by and between Infinium Labs, Inc. and Golden Gate Investors, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006).
 
 
10.5 
5¼% Convertible Debenture of Infinium Labs, Inc. dated as of January 24, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006 ).
 
 
10.6
Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of Infinium Labs, Inc. dated as of January 24, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006).
 
 
10.7
Addendum to Convertible Debenture, Warrant to Purchase Common Stock and Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 24, 2006 by and between Infinium Labs, Inc. and Golden Gate Investors, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006 ).
 
 
10.8
8% Promissory Note between the Company and Timothy Roberts, dated January 1, 2006 (filed herewith).
 
 
10.9
Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 24, 2006 between the Company and Golden Gate Investors, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006).
   
10.10
Registration Rights Agreement dated January 24, 2006 between the Company and Golden Gates Investors, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006).
   
10.11
5 ¼ % Convertible Debentures (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006).
   
10.12
Warrant to Purchase Common Stock issued by the Company to Golden Gate Investors, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006).
   
10.13
Addendum to Convertible Debenture, Warrant to Purchase Common Stock and Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 24, 2006 between the Company and Golden Gate Investors, Inc.
   
10.14
Stockholder Vesting Agreement dated January 11, 2006 between the Company and Greg Koler (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 13, 2006).
   
10.15
Conversion Agreement dated August 4, 2006 between Phantom Entertainment, Inc. and Richard Angelotti (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 21, 2006).
   
10.15
Stock Purchase Warrant dated June 30, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 21, 2006).
   
10.16
Non-negotiable Promissory Note between the Company and Ronald Westman in the amount of $100,000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 21, 2006).
   
10.17
Manufacturing and Supply Agreement, dated November 6, 2006 between the Company and Itron Technology, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 8, 2006).
   
10.18
Amendment to Secured Debentures between the Company and James Beshara dated September 22, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006).
   
10.19
Conversion Agreement dated October 23, 2006 by the Company and Timothy Roberts (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on November 20, 2006).
   
10.20
Original Issue Discount Secured Note dated December 7, 2006 in the aggregate face amount of $83,333 between Phantom Entertainment, Inc. and John Fife (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2006).
 
37

 
10.21
Original Issue Discount Secured Note dated December 7, 2006 in the aggregate face amount of $83,333 between Phantom Entertainment, Inc. and John Fife (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2006).
   
10.22
Original Issue Discount Secured Note dated December 7, 2006 in the aggregate face amount of $83,333 between Phantom Entertainment, Inc. and John Fife (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2006).
   
10.23
Stock Pledge Agreement between the Company and John Fife, dated December 7, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2006).
   
10.24
Guaranty dated December 7, 2006 by Timothy Roberts in favor of John Fife (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2006).
   
10.25
Employment Agreement between Phantom Entertainment, Inc. and Terrance Taylor dated December 4, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2006).
   
 
10.26
Settlement Agreement dated March 22, 2007 between the Company and Longview Special Finance, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007).
   
10.27
Product Licensing Agreements with Ione Technology Inc. with the effective date of the Agreements being July 1, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 1, 2007).
   
21.1
List of Subsidiaries. (Filed herewith)
   
31.1
Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 (Filed herewith).
 
 
32.1
Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Filed herewith).

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or to be billed to us by Webb & Company, P.A., our former independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and the aggregate estimate fees to be billed to us by Kempisty & Company, our current independent auditors, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006:
 
2006
 
2005
 
Audit Fees
 
$
55,000
 
$
63,758
 
Audit-Related Fees
 
$
0
 
$
0
 
All Other Fees
 
 
 
 
 

The Company currently does not have a designated Audit Committee, and accordingly, the Company's Board of Directors' policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent auditors and management are required to periodically report to the Company's Board of Directors regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Board of Directors may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis.
 
38

 
SIGNATURES
 
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
PHANTOM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:  May 18, 2007
By:  
/s/ Greg Koler
 
Name:   Greg Koler
 
Title:     Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
 
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  SIGNATURE
 
 TITLE
 
DATE
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  Greg Koler
 
Chief Executive Officer and
 
May 18, 2007
Greg Koler
 
Interim Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  Timothy Roberts
 
Chairman of the Board of Directors
 
May 18, 2007
Timothy Roberts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  Richard Angelotti   
 
Director
 
May 18, 2007
Richard Angelotti
 
 
 
 

 
39

 

PHANTOM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006 CONSOLIDATED AND 2005 (RESTATED)






 
PHANTOM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARY

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONTENTS

PAGE
F-1 - F-2
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
 
 
 
PAGE
F-3
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006  
 
 
 
PAGE
F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (Restated) and for the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to December 31, 2006
 
 
 
PAGES
F-5 - F-21
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency for the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) Through December 31, 2006
 
 
 
PAGE
F-22
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (Restated) and for the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to December 31, 2006
 
 
 
PAGES
F-23 - F-68
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors
Phantom Entertainment, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Phantom Entertainment, Inc. and Subsidiaries (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2006 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficiency and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The cumulative statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in stockholders' deficiency for the period December 9, 2002 (inception) to December 31, 2005 which were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for the period December 9, 2002 (inception) to December 31, 2005 is based solely on the reports of the other auditors.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, and based on the reports of other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Phantom Entertainment, Inc. and Subsidiaries (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2006, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, and for the period December 9, 2002 (inception) to December 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements, the Company has had recurring losses from inception of $73,550,242, has a working capital deficiency of $18,344,236, a stockholders' deficiency of $18,627,236, notes in default of $2,242,276 and used cash in operations from inceptionof $15,654,926. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 10. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Kempisty & Company CPA's PC

Kempisty & Company
Certified Public Accountants PC
New York, New York
May 18, 2007

 
F-1

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of:
Phantom Entertainment, Inc. f/k/a Infinium Labs, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficiency and cash flows of Phantom Entertainment, Inc. f/k/a Infinium Labs, Inc. and subsidiary (a development stage company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the period from December 9, 2002 (inception) to December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The consolidated financial statements of Infinium Labs Corporation as of October 31, 2003, were audited by other auditors whose report dated December 11, 2003, except for Note F as to which the date is January 26, 2004, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the results of Phantom Entertainment, Inc. f/k/a Infinium Labs, Inc. and subsidiary (a development stage company) operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the period from December 9, 2002 (inception) to December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has had recurring losses from inception of $64,025,296, has a working capital deficiency of $16,144,960, a stockholders deficiency of $16,144,960, notes in default of $3,486,759 and used cash in operations from inception of $15,339,599. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning this matter are also described in Note 10. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


WEBB & COMPANY, P.A.

Boynton Beach, Florida
May 16, 2006, except for Notes 1(P), 2(C), 5, 7, 8(A), 8(D), 9(B), 10, 11 and 12(C) as to which the date is August 18, 2006
 
F-2


PHANTOM ENTERTATNMENT INC. AND SUBSIDARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Balance Sheet


   
December 31, 2006
(Consolidated)
 
ASSETS
     
Current Assets:
     
Cash
 
$
57,051
 
Prepaid Expenses
   
1,000
 
Total Current Assets
   
58,051
 
 
       
Property and Equipment, Net
   
2,000
 
 
       
Total Assets
 
$
60,051
 
 
       
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
       
         
Current Liabilities:
       
Accounts payable
 
$
4,233,387
 
Due to developers
   
845,000
 
Accrued interest expense
   
1,435,569
 
Other accrued expense
   
220,994
 
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes (Note 8(F))
   
2,478,206
 
Derivatives (Note 5(B))
   
6,946,855
 
Promissory notes (Note 5(A)) 
   
2,242,276
 
Total Current Liabilities
   
18,402,287
 
 
       
Long Term Liabilities:
       
Deposits
   
285,000
 
Total Long Term Liabilities
   
285,000
 
         
Total Liabilities
   
18,687,287
 
         
Commitments and Contingencies
   
-
 
 
     
Stockholders’ Deficiency:
       
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
   
-
 
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 1,200,000,000 shares authorized, 1,052,576,151 shares issued and outstanding (Note 6)
   
105,258
 
Additional paid-in capital (Note 6)
   
54,840,265
 
Subscription receivable
   
(22,517
)
Accumulated deficit during development stage
   
(73,550,242
)
 
     
Total Stockholders’ Deficiency
   
(18,627,236
)
 
     
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency
 
$
60,051
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-3

 
PHANTOM ENTERTATNMENT INC. AND SUBSIDARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statements of Operations


   
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Consolidated
 
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2005
Consolidated
 
For the Period from
December 9, 2002
(Inception to
December 31, 2006)
Consolidated
 
       
Restated - Note 2
     
Operating Expenses:
                   
Development costs
 
$
311,052
 
$
(13,927
)
$
3,833,329
 
Advertising
   
141,893
   
404,331
   
2,134,780
 
Salary expense
   
1,433,205
   
5,677,365
   
14,268,476
 
Professional fees
   
607,738
   
1,265,317
   
5,577,658
 
Consultants
   
957,800
   
3,111,392
   
14,011,213
 
Impairment of assets
   
18,000
   
502,090
   
872,389
 
General and administrative
   
984,895
   
1,289,962
   
6,505,763
 
Total Operating Expenses
   
4,454,583
   
12,236,530
   
47,203,608
 
Net Loss from Operations
   
(4,454,583
)
 
(12,236,530
)
 
(47,203,608
)
                     
Other Income (Expense):
                   
Other income / (expense)
   
(670
)
 
383
   
1,647
 
Gain / (Loss) on sale of equipment
   
22,126
   
(5,011
)
 
16,667
 
Gain / (Loss) on conversion of notes
   
(330,872
)
 
(10,671,647
)
 
(11,002,519
)
Gain / (Loss) on vendor settlement
   
(1,235
)
 
-
   
(1,235
)
Gain / (Loss) on stock issued for payroll taxes
   
(79,983
)
 
(62,269
)
 
(142,252
)
Interest expense
   
(1,259,226
)
 
(5,900,848
)
 
(12,866,112
)
Derivatives income (expense)
   
(3,257,349
)
 
38,730,224
   
(1,433,540
)
Payroll Tax Penalties & Interest
   
(163,154
)
 
(208,322
)
 
(919,290
)
Total Other Income (Expense)
   
(5,070,363
)
 
21,882,510
   
(26,346,634
)
                     
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes
   
(9,524,946
)
 
9,645,980
   
(73,550,242
)
                     
Income Taxes
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Net Income (Loss)
 
$
(9,524,946
)
$
9,645,980
 
$
(73,550,242
)
 
                   
Per Common Share
                   
 
                   
Income (Loss) per common share - basic and diluted
 
$
(0.02
)
$
0.04
 
$
(0.29
)
                     
Income (Loss) per common share - basic and diluted
 
$
(0.02
)
$
0.03
 
$
(0.29
)
                     
Weighted average - basic
   
633,186,446
   
219,727,249
   
256,783,699
 
                     
Weighted average - diluted
   
633,186,446
   
405,579,272
   
256,783,699
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-4

 
PHANTOM ENTERTAINMENT INC. AND SUBSIDARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficiency
For the Period December 9, 2002 (Inception) to December 31, 2006


   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Stock issued to founders ($0.0004 per share)
   
-
 
$
-
   
58,189,728
 
$
5,819
 
$
12,703
 
$
-
 
$
(18,517
)
$
-
 
$
5
 
                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($0.12 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
4,423,012
   
442
   
526,261
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
526,703
 
                                                         
Stock issued for services ($0.3775 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,957,376
   
296
   
1,112,709
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,113,005
 
                                                         
Net loss for the period from December 9, 2002 (inception) to October 31, 2003
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(2,270,129
)
 
-
   
-
   
(2,270,129
)
                     
$
$
       
$
$
       
$
$
 
$
 
Balance, October 31, 2003
   
-
   
-
   
65,570,116
   
6,557
   
1,651,673
   
(2,270,129
)
 
(18,517
)
 
-
   
(630,416
)
                                                         
Stock issued for cash ($0.28 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,169,148
   
217
   
612,172
   
-
   
(145,000
)
 
-
   
467,389
 
                                                         
Stock issued for signage rights ($0.3175 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
942,600
   
94
   
299,906
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
300,000
 
                                                         
Stock issued for services ($0.3175 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
434,036
   
43
   
138,597
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
138,640
 
                                                         
Net loss for the two months ended December 31, 2003
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(674,945
)
 
-
   
-
   
(674,945
)
                     
$
$
       
$
$
       
$
$
 
$
 
Balance, December 31, 2003 (Restated - Note 2)
   
-
   
-
   
69,115,900
   
6,911
   
2,702,348
   
(2,945,074
)
 
(163,517
)
 
-
   
(399,332
)
                                                         
Recapitalization of Global Business Resources
   
-
   
-
   
16,156,000
   
1,615
   
(1,615
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
 
 
F-5

 

   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued for cash ($0.25 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
6,650,000
   
665
   
1,661,835
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,662,500
 
                                                         
Shares issued for cash ($0.257 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
141,000
   
-
   
141,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued with note payable ($0.78 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
560,000
   
56
   
433,944
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
434,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued for legal settlement ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
66,668
   
7
   
98,328
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
98,335
 
                                                         
Shares issued for services ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,750,000
   
175
   
2,581,075
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
2,581,250
 
                                                         
Shares issued with note payable ($1.47 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
7,500
         
11,025
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
11,025
 
                                                         
Shares issued with note payable ($1.42 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
200,000
   
20
   
283,980
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
284,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued with note payable ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
147,490
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
147,500
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued with note payable ($1.13 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
60,000
   
6
   
67,794
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
67,800
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued with note payable ($1.43 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
33,000
   
3
   
47,187
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
47,190
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued with note payable ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
511,000
   
51
   
753,674
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
753,725
 
 
                                               
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
74,999
   
8
   
110,616
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
110,624
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.13 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
75,000
   
8
   
84,742
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
84,750
 
 
F-6

 

   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
80,000
   
8
   
117,992
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
118,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.56 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
603,038
   
61
   
942,487
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
942,548
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.47 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
955,312
   
96
   
1,404,213
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,404,309
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for cash ($2.50 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
40,000
   
4
   
99,996
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
 
 
                                       
Shares issued for legal settlement ($1.455 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
53,332
   
5
   
77,560
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
77,565
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for cash ($2.00 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
199,990
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
200,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($1.44 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
830,000
   
83
   
1,195,117
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,195,200
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
147,490
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
147,500
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($1.60 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
279,260
   
28
   
446,788
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
446,816
 
 
                                               
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.92 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
440,000
   
44
   
404,756
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
404,800
 
 
                                                 
Beneficial conversion of promissory notes at $0.75 per share
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
71,275
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
71,275
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for loan guaranty ($1.04 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
800,000
   
80
   
831,920
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
832,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants ($1.13 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,000,000
   
100
   
1,129,900
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,130,000
 
 
F-7

 

   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.64 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
21,460
   
2
   
13,732
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
13,734
 
 
                                       
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.61 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
200,000
   
20
   
121,980
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
122,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.60 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
36,000
   
4
   
21,416
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
21,420
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.60 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,933,224
   
193
   
1,162,251
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,162,444
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to employees ($0.33 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
300,000
   
30
   
98,970
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
99,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for cash ($0.25 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,900,400
   
190
   
474,910
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
475,100
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.32 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,790,000
   
179
   
565,321
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
565,500
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to employees ($0.22 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,199,967
   
520
   
1,136,579
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,137,099
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to executives ($0.22 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,100,000
   
110
   
240,432
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
240,542
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.21 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
3,885,410
   
388
   
811,753
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
812,141
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued with notes payable ($0.42 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,750,000
   
175
   
734,825
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
735,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.28 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,350,000
   
135
   
377,365
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
377,500
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for interest ($0.18 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
375,000
   
38
   
67,462
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
67,500
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for services ($0.25 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
150,000
   
15
   
37,485
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
37,500
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for cash ($0.16 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,649,635
   
165
   
263,910
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
264,075
 
 
F-8

 

   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Beneficial conversion of promissory notes at $0.10 per share
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
318,500
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
318,500
 
 
                                                     
Fair value of warrants issued in conjunction with promissory notes ranging from $0.10 per share to $1.00 per share
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
295,000
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
295,000
 
 
                                       
Shares contributed in kind
   
-
   
-
   
(1,191,450
)
 
(119
)
 
119
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
                                                         
Fair value of derivatives unrelated to convertible notes
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(4,353,617
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
(4,353,617
)
 
                                           
Net loss, December 31, 2004
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(70,726,202
)
 
-
   
-
   
(70,726,202
)
 
                                             
Balance, December 31, 2004 (Restated - Note 2)
   
-
 
$
-
   
121,090,655
 
$
12,109
 
$
18,440,300
 
$
(73,671,276
)
$
(22,517
)
$
-
 
$
(55,241,384
)
 
                                             
Shares issued to Director for services ($1.59 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
40,000
   
4
   
63,596
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
63,600
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.87 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
125,179
   
13
   
108,916
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
108,929
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($1.18 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
7,043,750
   
704
   
8,310,921
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
8,311,625
 
 
                                       
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.54 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,200,000
   
120
   
647,880
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
648,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.365 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
4,925,291
   
493
   
1,797,238
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,797,731
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.32 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,722,453
   
172
   
558,675
   
-
   
-
   
(19,665
)
 
539,182
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to employees ($0.25 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
225,000
   
22
   
56,228
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
56,250
 
 
F-9


   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.122 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,815,069
   
582
   
711,336
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
711,918
 
 
                                       
Shares issued to consultant for services ($0.32 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
31,990
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
32,000
 
 
                                               
Shares issued to Director for services ($0.34 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
800,000
   
80
   
271,920
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
272,000
 
 
                                                 
Beneficial conversion of promissory notes
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
375,000
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
375,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.32 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,423,734
   
143
   
319,812
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
319,955
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.17 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
13,325,000
   
1,333
   
2,280,600
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
2,281,933
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultant for services ($0.18 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
250,000
   
25
   
44,975
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
45,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to employee ($0.23 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
22,990
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
23,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.15 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
601,725
   
60
   
90,199
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
90,259
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,936,644
   
294
   
293,370
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
293,664
 
 
                                                 
Loss on conversion of note payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
69,863
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
69,863
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to employees ($0.15 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
678,067
   
68
   
101,242
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
101,310
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.15 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,255,097
   
225
   
338,550
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
338,775
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to employees ($0.15 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
962,324
   
96
   
143,244
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
143,340
 
 
F-10

 

   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to employees ($0.12 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,162,720
   
116
   
139,410
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
139,526
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to executive ($0.15 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
250,000
   
25
   
37,475
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
37,500
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.16 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
3,961,170
   
396
   
633,391
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
633,787
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.16 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
3,700,000
   
370
   
591,630
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
592,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.14 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,900,000
   
590
   
825,828
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
826,418
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.14 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
12,000,000
   
1,200
   
1,685,636
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,686,836
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.16 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,976,021
   
198
   
315,965
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
316,163
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to executive ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
250,000
   
25
   
24,975
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
25,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to executive ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
500,000
   
50
   
49,950
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
50,000
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.11 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,934,536
   
293
   
322,342
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
322,635
 
 
                                               
Shares issued to employees ($0.08 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,122,675
   
212
   
178,188
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
178,400
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.11 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
3,695,339
   
369
   
403,642
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
404,011
 
 
                                                 
Shares returned to Treasury per legal settlement ($1.47 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
(120,000
)
 
(12
)
 
(175,888
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
(175,900
)
 
F-11

 

   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,075,453
   
208
   
207,337
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
207,545
 
 
                                                 
Loss on conversion of note payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
62,263
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
62,263
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
3,187,206
   
319
   
318,402
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
318,721
 
 
                                                 
Loss on conversion of note payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
95,616
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
95,616
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,110,298
   
111
   
110,919
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
111,030
 
 
                                                 
Loss on conversion of note payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,309
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,309
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,109,069
   
111
   
110,796
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
110,907
 
 
                                                 
Loss on conversion of note payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,272
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,272
 
 
                                               
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,863,852
   
186
   
186,199
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
186,385
 
 
                                                 
Loss on conversion of note payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,416
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,416
 
 
                                                     
Beneficial conversion of promissory notes
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
220,400
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
220,400
 
 
                                                     
Deferred Compensation
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
         
-
   
-
   
9,941
   
9,941
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
500,000
   
50
   
49,950
   
-
   
-
   
(10,000
)
 
40,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.096 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
32,000
   
3
   
3,069
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,072
 
 
F-12


   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.084 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
22,000
   
2
   
1,849
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,851
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.09 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
72,223
   
7
   
6,493
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
6,500
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.086 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
50,000
   
5
   
4,297
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
4,302
 
                                                         
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.09 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,549,075
   
255
   
229,162
   
-
   
-
   
(52,631
)
 
176,786
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.10 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
50,000
   
5
   
4,995
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
5,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,767,036
   
277
   
195,015
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
195,292
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
182,799
   
18
   
12,778
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
12,796
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.065 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
6,490
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
6,500
 
                                                         
Shares issued to executives and director ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,891,655
   
189
   
132,227
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
132,416
 
                                                         
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.08 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
368,375
   
37
   
29,433
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
29,470
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
150,000
   
15
   
10,485
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
10,500
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.08 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
492,940
   
49
   
39,386
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
39,435
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.09 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
333,340
   
33
   
29,967
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
30,000
 
 
F-13

 

   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.075 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
86,667
   
9
   
6,491
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
6,500
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.06 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
250,000
   
25
   
14,975
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
15,000
 
                                                       
Shares issued to employee ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
6,990
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
7,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.05 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,096,623
   
210
   
104,621
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
104,831
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,399,879
   
240
   
167,752
   
-
   
-
   
(140,000
)
 
27,992
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.09 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
62,500
   
6
   
5,619
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
5,625
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.06 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
53,571
   
5
   
3,209
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,214
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
750,000
   
75
   
52,425
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
52,500
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,600,000
   
260
   
181,740
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
182,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to director ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,000,000
   
500
   
349,500
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
350,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to executive ($0.07 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
10,000,000
   
1,000
   
699,000
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
700,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert accrued interest on note payable ($0.054 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
7,114,667
   
711
   
383,481
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
384,192
 
 
                                       
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.06 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
250,000
   
25
   
14,975
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
15,000
 
 
F-14


   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.05 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,629,027
   
163
   
81,288
   
-
   
-
   
(27,505
)
 
53,946
 
                                                         
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.049 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
6,361,113
   
636
   
311,059
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
311,695
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert notes payable ($0.0472 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
12,882,049
   
1,288
   
617,479
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
618,767
 
 
                                               
Loss on conversion of notes payable
   
-
   
-
               
14,169
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
14,169
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.045 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
3,385,259
   
339
   
151,998
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
152,337
 
 
                                     
Loss on conversion of note payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
16,926
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
16,926
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.055 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,415,729
   
542
   
297,323
   
-
   
-
   
(85,758
)
 
212,107
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.05 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
3,045,708
   
305
   
151,981
   
-
   
-
   
(44,648
)
 
107,638
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.045 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
3,977,894
   
398
   
178,607
   
-
   
-
   
(50,058
)
 
128,947
 
                                                         
Deferred Compensation
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
9,724
   
9,724
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.032 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
264,822
   
26
   
8,448
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
8,474
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.029 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
500,000
   
50
   
14,450
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
14,500
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.020 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,536,850
   
154
   
30,583
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
30,737
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($.029 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
7,246,455
   
725
   
199,459
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
200,184
 
 
F-15


   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Loss on conversion of note
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
9,964
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
9,964
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.025 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
15,299,873
   
1,530
   
380,967
   
-
   
-
   
(112,695
)
 
269,802
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.028 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
699,780
   
70
   
19,524
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
19,594
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.022 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,247,956
   
225
   
49,230
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
49,455
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.024 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,000,000
   
100
   
23,900
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
24,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.021 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
6,380,900
   
638
   
133,361
   
-
   
-
   
(91,165
)
 
42,834
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.015 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,000,000
   
200
   
29,800
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
30,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.022 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,134,261
   
113
   
24,840
   
-
   
-
   
(5,328
)
 
19,625
 
                                                         
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.022 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,071,175
   
507
   
111,059
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
111,566
 
                                                         
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.022 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,134,775
   
114
   
24,851
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
24,965
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert notes payable & accrued interest ($0.015 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
7,948,856
   
795
   
104,925
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
105,720
 
                                                         
Loss on conversion of notes payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
13,513
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
13,513
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.02 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
10,694,577
   
1,069
   
212,823
   
-
   
-
   
(188,510
)
 
25,382
 
 
F-16

 

   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to employees ($0.02 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
30,342,931
   
3,034
   
592,570
   
-
   
-
   
(176,513
)
 
419,091
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert notes payable ($0.017)
   
-
   
-
   
16,000,000
   
1,600
   
79,141
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
80,741
 
                                                         
Deferred compensation
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
503,260
   
503,260
 
                                                         
Fair value adjustment of derivatives for note conversions
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
280,492
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
280,492
 
                                                         
Net loss, December 31, 2005
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
9,645,980
   
-
   
-
   
9,645,980
 
 
                                         
BALANCE, December 31, 2005 (Restated - Note 2)
   
-
 
$
-
   
399,823,667
 
$
39,982
 
$
48,344,422
 
$
(64,025,296
)
$
(22,517
)
$
(481,551
)
$
(16,144,960
)
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.0167 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
510,992
   
51
   
8,482
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
8,533
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.021 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,789,474
   
279
   
58,299
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
58,578
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable & accrued interest ($0.015 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,900,000
   
290
   
28,229
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
28,519
 
                                                         
Loss on conversion of notes payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
13,241
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
13,241
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.019 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
7,030,932
   
703
   
132,885
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
133,588
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.018 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
6,327,718
   
633
   
113,265
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
113,898
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.018 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,862,640
   
586
   
104,638
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
105,224
 
                                                         
Shares issued for services ($0.0145 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
372,414
   
37
   
5,363
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
5,400
 
 
F-17


   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.0235 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
255,319
   
26
   
5,974
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
6,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.02 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
646,552
   
65
   
12,866
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
12,931
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.0197 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
4,060,913
   
406
   
79,594
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
80,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.0203 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,724,138
   
172
   
34,828
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
35,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.024 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,195,905
   
220
   
52,482
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
52,702
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($.019 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,636,330
   
164
   
34,155
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
34,319
 
                                                         
Gain on conversion of note
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(3,229
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
(3,229
)
                                                         
Shares issued for services ($0.0185 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
243,243
   
24
   
4,476
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
4,500
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.0235 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
9,600,625
   
960
   
224,829
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
225,789
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.0197 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,219,112
   
522
   
102,295
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
102,817
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert notes payable & accrued interest ($0.0215 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
40,000,000
   
4,000
   
570,502
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
574,502
 
                                                         
Loss on conversion of notes payable
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
285,498
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
285,498
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert notes payable & accrued interest ($0.07654 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
19,999,999
   
2,000
   
117,059
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
119,059
 
 
F-18


   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Fair value adjustment of derivatives for note conversions
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
326,627
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
326,627
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.0196 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
589,051
   
59
   
11,474
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
11,533
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable & accrued interest ($0.0085 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
15,000,000
   
1,500
   
125,554
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
127,054
 
                                                         
Fair value adjustment of derivatives for note conversions
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
145,833
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
145,833
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable & accrued interest ($0.0085 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
15,000,000
   
1,500
   
129,803
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
131,303
 
                                                         
Fair value adjustment of derivatives for note conversions
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
138,480
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
138,480
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.0120 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,853,497
   
185
   
21,965
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
22,150
 
                                                         
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.0125 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
30,000,000
   
3,000
   
372,000
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
375,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.0140 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
6,830,929
   
683
   
94,950
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
95,633
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.0165 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
20,000,000
   
2,000
   
328,000
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
330,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to satisfy payroll liability in a legal settlement ($0.0165 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
4,242,820
   
424
   
51,312
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
51,736
 
                                                         
Loss on payroll related legal settlement
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
18,270
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
18,270
 
 
F-19


   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.015 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,663,536
   
166
   
24,787
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
24,953
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.0145 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
10,027,731
   
1,003
   
133,288
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
134,291
 
                                                         
Loss on note conversion
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
11,111
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
11,111
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.015 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
42,393,246
   
4,239
   
631,659
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
635,898
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.013 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,000,000
   
200
   
25,800
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
26,000
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.0098 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
18,382,249
   
1,838
   
178,308
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
180,146
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.0098 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
4,318,009
   
432
   
41,885
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
42,317
 
                                                         
Shares issued to satisfy vendor payable ($0.01 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
9,396,064
   
940
   
99,060
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
 
                                                         
Gain on vendor settlement
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(6,039
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
(6,039
)
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.012 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
10,000,000
   
1,000
   
88,551
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
89,551
 
                                                         
Loss on note conversion
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
30,449
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
30,449
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.0073 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,100,000
   
110
   
7,946
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
8,056
 
                                                         
Fair value of derivatives upon note conversion
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
21,473
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
21,473
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.0037 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
19,758,376
   
1,976
   
70,887
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
72,863
 
 
F-20


   
Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
 
Accumulated
Deficit During Development
 
Stock
Subscriptions
 
Deferred
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Stage
 
Receivable
 
Compensation
 
Total
 
Shares issued to employees ($0.0053 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
51,479,252
   
5,148
   
268,320
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
273,468
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.0046 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
69,172,000
   
6,917
   
308,618
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
315,535
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.0041 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
49,728,000
   
4,973
   
198,616
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
203,589
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.0051 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
20,000,000
   
2,000
   
100,158
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
102,158
 
                                                         
Gain on note conversion
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(158
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
(158
)
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.0049 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
19,940,582
   
1,994
   
95,715
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
97,709
 
                                                         
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.004 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
29,197,010
   
2,920
   
112,599
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
115,519
 
                                                         
Shares issued to employees ($0.0033 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,454,258
   
146
   
4,653
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
4,799
 
                                                         
Shares issued to executive ($0.0033 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
20,000,000
   
2,000
   
64,000
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
66,000
 
                                                         
Unauthorized shares issued ($0.0035 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
56,000,000
   
5,600
   
189,200
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
194,800
 
                                                         
Shares issued to executive ($0.0038 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
9,000,000
   
900
   
33,300
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
34,200
 
                                                         
Shares issued to executive ($0.0036 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,000,000
   
100
   
3,500
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,600
 
                                                         
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.0026 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,849,568
   
185
   
4,651
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
4,836
 
                                                         
Fair value adjustment of derivatives for note conversion
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,507
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,507
 
                                                         
Deferred compensation
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
481,551
   
481,551
 
                                                         
Net loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2006
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(9,524,946
)
 
-
   
-
   
(9,524,946
)
                                                         
BALANCE, December 31, 2006
   
-
 
$
-
   
1,052,576,151
 
$
105,258
 
$
54,840,265
 
$
(73,550,242
)
$
(22,517
)
 
-
 
$
(18,627,236
)
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
 
F-21


PHANTOM ENTERTAINMENT INC. AND SUBSIDARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows


   
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2006
(Consolidated)
 
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2005
(Consolidated)
 
For the Period from
December 9, 2002
(Inception) to
December 31, 2006
 
       
Restated - Note 2
     
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
                   
Net loss
 
$
(9,524,946
)
$
9,645,980
 
$
(73,550,242
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                   
Depreciation and amortization
   
-
   
208,547
   
382,895
 
Impairment of assets
   
18,000
   
502,090
   
872,389
 
Loss on disposal of assets
   
-
   
5,011
   
5,459
 
Common stock issued for services
   
1,564,606
   
4,493,531
   
15,762,127
 
Common Stock issued to employees
   
1,087,432
   
2,821,858
   
5,951,431
 
Common Stock embezzled
   
194,800
   
-
   
194,800
 
Common stock issued for legal settlements
   
-
   
(175,900
)
 
-
 
Common stock issued for interest
   
379,328
   
1,243,314
   
4,350,373
 
Common stock issued for loan guarantee
   
-
   
-
   
832,000
 
Common stock issued for vendor settlement
   
622,662
   
1,020,353
   
1,643,015
 
(Gain)/Loss on vendor settlement
   
-
   
(27,367
)
 
(27,367
)
Loss on conversion of notes payable
   
330,872
   
10,671,647
   
11,002,519
 
Legal fees on conversion of notes payable
   
13,465
   
40,131
   
53,596
 
Legal fees on vendor settlement
   
-
   
28,483
   
28,483
 
Amortization of interest expense
   
150,000
   
3,599,312
   
5,924,900
 
Derivatives (income) expense
   
3,257,349
   
(38,730,224
)
 
1,433,540
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                   
Decrease (increase) in current assets:
                   
Prepaid expenses and other receivables
   
6,071
   
59,925
   
(1,000
)
Deferred costs
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Deposits
   
-
   
5,440
   
-
 
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities:
                   
Accounts payable
   
382,113
   
240,389
   
4,221,387
 
Due to developers
   
-
   
(140,000
)
 
845,000
 
Deposits-prepaid warrants
   
285,000
   
-
   
285,000
 
Accrued interest
   
589,432
   
544,722
   
1,435,569
 
Other accrued expense
   
214,488
   
(98,494
)
 
220,994
 
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes
   
114,001
   
698,436
   
2,478,206
 
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
   
(315,327
)
 
(3,342,816
)
 
(15,654,926
)
 
                   
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
                   
Purchase of property and equipment
   
(20,000
)
 
10,310
   
(980,157
)
Sale of property and equipment
   
-
   
5,660
   
17,415
 
Increase in restricted cash
   
-
   
894,910
   
-
 
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
   
(20,000
)
 
910,880
   
(962,742
)
 
                   
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
                   
Repayments of notes payable
   
-
   
-
   
(1,075,000
)
Proceeds from stockholder
   
-
   
-
   
4,940
 
Payments to stockholder
   
-
   
-
   
(4,940
)
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net
   
150,000
   
795,400
   
9,677,147
 
Promissory note
   
241,775
   
1,633,037
   
8,072,572
 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
   
391,775
   
2,428,437
   
16,674,719
 
 
                   
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
   
56,448
   
(3,499
)
 
57,051
 
 
                   
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
   
603
   
4,102
   
-
 
 
                   
CASH AT END OF PERIOD
 
$
57,051
 
$
603
 
$
57,051
 
 
                   
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
                   
 
                   
Cash paid for interest
 
$
255
 
$
18,750
 
$
534,093
 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
 
F-22

 
PHANTOM ENTERTAINMENT INC. AND SUBSIDARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION

(A) Organization and Basis of Presentation

Infinium Labs Operating Corporation, a Delaware corporation, formed on December 9, 2002 seeking to develop and commercialize an innovative broadband video game delivery system designed to allow consumers to purchase and play games directly over the internet. Infinium Labs Operating Corporation became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Infinium Labs, Inc. (“Infinium”) as part of a merger with Global Business Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation, on January 5, 2004. Subsequent to the merger, Global Business Resources, Inc. changed its name to Infinium Labs, Inc.

In January 2006 we adjusted our business plan to primarily focus on developing and seeking to commercialize the Phantom Lapboard, a wireless, rotating custom keyboard/turntable with integrated mousepad. With adequate financing, we intend to launch the Phantom Lapboard in 2007 for sale directly through our Internet website. The Phantom Lapboard is designed with a pc gamer in mind, and is intended to transform the way gamers think about computer keyboards. Depending on the success rate for sales and associated revenue of the Phantom Lapboard during the introductory period of three to six months, we may seek to develop and commercialize the Phantom Game Service. We still retain assets with respect to the Phantom Game Service and when various milestones for the manufacturing of the Phantom Lapboard are completed we may shift more of our focus to the Phantom Game Service.

On July 13, 2006, we held a Special Meeting of Stockholders wherein the Infinium Labs, Inc. changed its name to Phantom Entertainment, Inc. Due to the change in the Company’s name, its CUSIP number, as assigned by the CUSIP Service Bureau, changed as did its trading symbol, as assigned by NASDAQ.
 
(B) Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
(C) Consolidation
 
The accompanying December 31, 2006 and 2005 consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Phantom Entertainment, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Infinium Labs Operating Corporation. Inter company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

(D) Research and Development Costs
 
The Company’s software products reach technological feasibility shortly before the products are released for manufacturing. Costs incurred after technological feasibility is established are not material, and accordingly, the Company expenses all research and development costs when incurred.
 
(E) Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of three to seven years. Various note holders have a security interest in the Company’s assets. In December 2005, all remaining assets were impaired. In December 2006, the company purchased $20,000 of additional assets of which $18,000 was impaired as of December 31, 2006.
 
F-23

 
(F) Income Taxes
 
The Company accounts for income taxes under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement 109”). Under Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
 
(G) Income / (Loss) Per Share

Basic and diluted net income / (loss) per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards “SFAS” No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” For the year ended December 31, 2005 both basic and diluted EPS are:

 
 
Income
(Numerator)
 
Shares
(Denominator)
 
Price per
Share
 
 
      
 
      
Net Income
 
$
9,645,980
           
Basic Income per common share
                   
Income available to common shareholders
   
9,645,980
   
219,727,249
   
0.04
 
 
             
Warrants
         
13,653,121
       
Convertible debentures (net of tax)
   
866,892
   
172,198,902
     
 
             
Diluted Income per common share
             
Income available to common stockholders + assumed conversions
 
$
10,512,872
   
405,579,272
 
$
0.03
 

For the year ended December 31, 2006 and the period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through December 31, 2006, the effect of common share equivalents was anti-dilutive and not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share. Warrants to purchase 14,329,874 shares of common stock at prices of $0.25, $0.50, $0.75 and $1.00 were outstanding at December 31, 2005 and were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the warrants’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares. These warrants expire between October 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009.

(H) Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed either in the periods in which those costs are incurred or the first time the advertising takes place. For the year ended December 31, 2006 the year ended December 31, 2005 and the period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to December 31, 2006, the Company incurred advertising costs of $141,893, $404,331, $2,134,780 respectively.

F-24

 
(I) Business Segments
 
The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
 
(J) Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. 
 
(K) Concentration of Credit Risk
 
The Company at times has cash in banks in excess of FDIC insurance limits and places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At December 31 2006, the Company had no cash in excess of FDIC insurance limits.
 
(L) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, receivables, accrued expenses and notes payable approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.
 
(M) Stock Based Compensation
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," which replaces SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25. Under SFAS No. 123(R), companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. In March 2005 the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, or "SAB 107". SAB 107 expresses views of the staff regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides the staff's views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. SFAS No. 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using one of two methods. On April 14, 2005, the SEC adopted a new rule amending the compliance dates for SFAS 123R. Companies may elect to apply this statement either prospectively, or on a modified version of retrospective application under which financial statements for prior periods are adjusted on a basis consistent with the pro forma disclosures required for those periods under SFAS 123. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company has fully adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and related interpretations as provided by SAB 107. As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at the fair value. Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant. The Company applies this statement prospectively.
 
(N) Long-Lived Assets, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
 
In accordance with SFAS 142 and 144, long-lived assets, goodwill and certain identifiable intangible assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets, the recoverability test is performed using undiscounted net cash flows related to the long-lived assets.
 
(O) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return (including a decision whether to file or not to file a return in a particular jurisdiction). The accounting provisions of FIN No.48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently assessing whether adoption of this Interpretation will have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
F-25

 
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which establishes a framework for reporting fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this standard on its financial statement.
 
(P) Derivative Liabilities
 
The Company accounts for its embedded conversion features and freestanding warrants pursuant to SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" and EITF 00-19 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock”, which require a periodic valuation of their fair value and a corresponding recognition of liabilities associated with such derivatives. The recognition of derivative liabilities related to the issuance of shares of common stock is applied first to the proceeds of such issuance, at the date of issuance, and the excess of derivative liabilities over the proceeds is recognized as other expense in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The recognition of derivative liabilities related to the issuance of convertible debt is applied first to the proceeds of such issuance as a debt discount, at the date of issuance, and the excess of derivative liabilities over the proceeds is recognized as other expense in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Any subsequent increase or decrease in the fair value of the derivative liabilities is recognized as other expense or other income, respectively.
 
NOTE 2 RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Derivatives and Corresponding Liability

The Company determined that it failed to account for its embedded conversion features and freestanding warrants pursuant to: SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" and EITF 00-19 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock”, which require a periodic valuation of their fair value and a corresponding recognition of liabilities associated with such derivatives. This failure occurred for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2005. These restated amounts are reflected in the financial statements at December 31, 2005.

A summary of significant effects of the restatement is as follows:

 
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2005
(As Previously
Reported)
 
 
Amount of 
Change
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2005
Ended
(As Restated)
 
Statement of Operations
             
 
             
General and administrative
 
$
2,220,324
   
(930,362
)
$
1,289,962
 
Total Operating Expenses
   
13,166,892
   
(930,362
)
 
12,236,530
 
Net loss from operations
   
(13,166,892
)
 
930,262
   
(12,236,530
)
Interest expense
   
(5,700,848
)
 
(200,000
)
 
(5,900,848
)
Derivative income
   
0
   
38,730,224
   
38,730,224
 
Total Other Income (Expense)
   
(16,647,714
)
 
38,530,224
   
21,882,510
 
Net income (loss)
   
(29,814,606
)
 
39,460,586
   
9,645,980
 
Income (Loss) per common share - basic
 
$
(0.14
)
$
0.18
 
$
0.04
 
Income (Loss) per common share - diluted
 
$
(0.14
)
$
0.17
 
$
0.03
 
 
F-26

 
NOTE 3 INTANGIBLE ASSETS

During 2003, the Company entered into an agreement for the signage rights to a building located in Sarasota, Florida. The agreement called for the Company to issue 942,600 shares of common stock in exchange for signage rights beginning April 1, 2004 through May 31, 2009. The shares were valued at the recent cash offering price aggregating $300,000. The Company amortized the cost over the life of the agreement. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had amortized $96,651 of expense of the signage rights. The remaining value of $203,049 was impaired in December 2005 as a result of the Company’s decision to close the Sarasota, Florida office. On June 30, 2006, the Company relinquished its signage rights, if any, as part of a settlement agreement with the landlord.

NOTE 4 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of:

 
 
December 31,
2006
 
 
 
 
 
Office equipment
 
$
97,190
 
Computer equipment
   
340,170
 
Computer software
   
357,922
 
Office furniture
   
110,686
 
Leasehold improvements
   
36,914
 
  Property & Equipment, Total
   
942,882
 
Less accumulated depreciation
   
(278,295
)
Less impairment
   
(662,587
)
  Property & Equipment, Net
 
$
2,000
 

Depreciation expense during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, and the period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to December 31, 2006 was $0, $155,400and $286,765, respectively. During 2006 and 2005, the Company recognized impairment of property and equipment of $18,000 and 298,741 respectively due to the restructuring of the offices in Seattle, Washington and Sarasota, Florida.

NOTE 5   NOTES PAYABLE 

(A) Notes Issued
 
During 2003, the Company received $275,000, net of offering costs of $25,000 in the form of a 20% secured convertible debenture that matures on February 28, 2004 and is guaranteed by the Company's Chairman. The maximum borrowings available under the debenture agreement are $750,000. The debenture is secured by all of the Company's assets and is convertible in its entirety at the option of the holder into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $1.00. There was no beneficial conversion recognized on the issuance of the convertible notes payable as the conversion price was equal to recent cash offering price. During February 2004, the entire convertible note was repaid with cash of $275,000. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding balance on the convertible debenture was $0.
 
F-27

 
During 2003, the Company entered into a $100,000 convertible note payable in full settlement of a lawsuit. The note is non-interest bearing and was due August 11, 2004. The note is convertible at the option of the note holder at any time at the current trading price of the Company's common stock. During February 2004, the entire convertible note was repaid with cash of $100,000. At December 31, 2006, the balance on the note payable was $0.
 
In February 2004, the Company authorized a private debt offering of secured 12% and 15% promissory notes with due dates one year from the date of issuance, within sixty days of the Company's SB-2 becoming effective or upon the Company receiving an equity investment of at least $15,000,000. For each loan to the Company, the lender was also entitled to 20,000 shares of the Company's common stock. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued an aggregate of $2,400,000 promissory notes and issued 560,000 common shares. The shares were treated as a discount to the private offering, the shares were valued at $434,000 based on the market price on the dates the funds were received and the discount is being amortized over the life of the notes. $1,000,000 of these notes were settled on May 16, 2005 via a Settlement Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.14. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $540,000. At September 30, 2005, the balance on theses notes payable was $1,400,000 which is currently in default. Accrued interest of $364,192 was paid on the $1,400,000 note in August 2005 via a Settlement Agreement which converted the accrued interest on the note to common stock at a per share price of $.054. On March 17, 2006 40,000,000 shares were issued to convert $130,411 of accrued interest, $49,108 of future interest and $389,528 of principal into common stock with a fair value of $0.0215 per share per a conversion agreement. The Company recognized a $285,498 loss on the conversion. On September 6, 2006 10,000,000 shares were issued to convert $73,584 of accrued interest and $15,966 of principal into common stock with a fair value of $0.012 per share per terms of a conversion agreement. The Company recognized a $30,449 loss on the conversion. On September 22, 2006 the debenture was amended to give the noteholder the right to convert all principal and unpaid interest into common stock. The interest rate was amended to 17%. Under the terms of the agreement, the first $310,000 of market value would be discounted by 22.5% and a 15% discount would apply thereafter. On September 29, 2006 1,100,000 shares were issued to convert $8,056 of principal into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On October 4, 2006 3,000,000 shares were issued to convert $18,130 of principal and $2,297 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On October 11, 2006 4,550,000 shares were issued to convert $20,756 of principal and $3,157 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On October 18, 2006 13,050,000 shares were issued to convert $52,031 of principal and $2,648 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On October 20, 2006 11,090,000 shares were issued to convert $46,281 of principal and $1,251 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On October 25, 2006 11,482,000 shares were issued to convert $48,660 of principal and $1,978 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. On October 31, 2006 26,000,000 shares were issued to convert $116,109 of principal and $2,237 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On November 2, 2006 14,000,000 shares were issued to convert $69,169 of principal and $638 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On November 8, 2006 12,000,000 shares were issued to convert $50,209 of principal and $1,720 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On November 10, 2006 14,000,000 shares were issued to convert $53,061 of principal and $526 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On November 14, 2006 9,728,000 shares were issued to convert $27,313 of principal and $954 of accrued interest into common stock per terms of the conversion agreement. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. The terms of the revised conversion agreement make the note a derivative liability as the entire amount of the note is convertible into an undetermined number of shares. At December 31, 2006 the principal balance was $484,731 and accrued interest outstanding was $10,862. These notes are secured with the assets of the Company and are currently in default.
 
F-28

 
On February 27, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 12% secured subordinated debenture for a maximum term of 12 months This note was settled on May 16, 2005 via a Settlement Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.14. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $265,500.
 
On April 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 15% promissory note which was initially payable on December 15, 2004 and subsequently became payable on March 31, 2005 per a conversion option agreement dated November 10, 2004 that entitles the note holder to convert the amount of the note into shares of stock at a per share price of $0.10; the conversion option was treated as a $216,000 discount to the debenture and the discount was amortized over the life of the conversion option agreement. In addition, the note holder is entitled to a Stock Purchase Warrant for 200% of the number of shares obtained in the conversion at a warrant exercise price of $0.10. As additional consideration, the Company issued to the holder 200,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $284,000. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note is secured with the assets of the Company. On March 22, 2005, the note was paid in full via a Conversion Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of interest for $130,411.
 
On May 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $100,000 under a 15% promissory note. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 40,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $55,200. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note was fully paid off as of December 31, 2006.
 
On May 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $250,000 under a 15% promissory note which was initially payable on September 15, 2004 and was extended to April 30, 2005 per a conversion option agreement dated November 10, 2004 that entitles the note holder to convert the amount of the note into shares of stock at a per share price of $0.10; the conversion option was treated as a $102,500 discount to the debenture and the discount was amortized over the life of the conversion option agreement. In addition, the note holder is entitled to a Stock Purchase Warrant for 200% of the number of shares obtained in the conversion at a warrant exercise price of $0.10. As additional consideration, the Company issued to the holder 100,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $147,500. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note was secured with the assets of the Company. On May 7, 2005, the note was paid in full via a Conversion Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $69,863 as related to the conversion of interest.
   
On May 19, 2004, the Company borrowed $417,260 under a 15% secured promissory note which was initially payable on June 3, 2004 but has been amended to January 15, 2005 for an additional consideration of $30,000. The additional consideration was amortized over the life of the amendment. This note was settled on May 10, 2005 via a Settlement Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.16. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $158,447.
 
On May 28, 2004, the Company borrowed $350,000 under a 15% secured promissory note, which was payable August 1, 2004. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 33,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $47,190. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount was amortized over the life of the note. The note is secured with the assets of the Company. This note was settled on January 6, 2005 via a Conversion Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $3,803,625.
 
On May 28, 2004, the Company borrowed $350,000 under a 15% promissory note which was initially payable on June 8, 2004 but has been amended to January 1, 2005 for additional consideration of $30,000. The additional consideration was amortized over the life of the amendment. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 7,500 shares of common stock having a fair value of $11,025. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount was amortized over the life of the note. This note was settled on May 10, 2005 via a Settlement Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.16. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $222,000.
 
F-29

 
On June 4, 2004, the Company borrowed $825,000 under a 15% secured convertible promissory note, which was initially due no later than June 3, 2005 but the note was amended to be payable no later than January 15, 2005. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 511,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $753,725. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The entire amount of the note was convertible into shares of common stock at a price of $0.75 per share and the Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $71,275. The beneficial conversion was treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note is secured with the assets of the Company. On February 11, 2005, the note was settled via a Settlement Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.215. The Company recognized a loss on the settlement of $738,794.
 
On June 21, 2004, the Company borrowed $1,500,000 under a 15% promissory note, which was payable no later than June 22, 2005. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 60,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $67,800. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. As consideration for the Chairman’s personal guaranty of note, the Company compensated the Chairman $50,000. This note was settled on April 11, 2005 via a Settlement Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.17. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $716,933.
 
On July 28, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 15% promissory note which is payable on July 28, 2005. As consideration for the personal guaranty of note by Richard Angelotti, a Director, the Company issued the Director 800,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $832,000. On November 1, 2005 the note and unpaid interest was assigned to a Director. On December 9, 2005 the note was amended to include accrued interest of $60,437 with simple interest due December 31, 2006. The principal and accrued interest on this note as of June 30, 2006 was $616,949. On August 4, 2006, the entire amount of the note ($560,437) plus accrued interest of $64,450 was converted at a per share price of $0.015. On August 4, 2006 the Company issued 41,659,182 shares of common stock with a fair value of $624,888 ($0.015 per share) to convert the note and accrued interest. The Company recognized no gain or loss on the conversion. Accrued interest in the amount of $17,500 remains outstanding at December 31, 2006.
 
On September 13, 2004, the Company borrowed $350,000 under a 15% secured promissory note, which is payable September 13, 2005. The note is secured with the assets of the Company. On January 6, 2005, the note was paid in full via a Conversion Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $3,803,625.

On October 20, 2004, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with Hazinu Ltd. pursuant to which the Lender advanced the principal amount of $300,000 to the Company on October 21, 2004 in exchange for (i) a 10% secured promissory note in such principal amount, (ii) 500,000 shares of our common stock, and (iii) warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The value of the shares and warrants of $152,500 and $147,500, respectively were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note was due December 31, 2004 and during December 2004, the entire note was repaid with cash. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding balance on the convertible debenture was $0.

On October 27, 2004, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with JM Investors, LLC, Fenmore Holdings, LLC, Viscount Investments Limited and Congregation Mishkan Sholom pursuant to which the Lenders advanced an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 to the Company on October 28, 2004 in exchange for (i) 10% secured promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount, (ii) 500,000 shares of our common stock and (iii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The value of the shares and warrants of $152,500 and $147,500, respectively were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note was due December 31, 2004 and during December 2004, the entire note was repaid with cash. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding balance on the convertible debenture was $0.
  
F-30

 
On December 13, 2004, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with 15 various entities pursuant to which the Lenders advanced an aggregate principal amount of $1,160,000 to the Company on December 16, 2004 in exchange for (i) 8% secured promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount, (ii) 250,000 shares of our common stock and (iii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 16,312,461 shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.10 to $1.00 per share. The value of the shares and warrants of $60,000 and $1,100,000, respectively were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The debentures are convertible into shares of common stock. The conversion price of the debentures is seventy-five percent of the lowest closing price during the five trading days ending on the trading day before the conversion date; provided, however, that in no event will such price be more than $0.10. On October 10, 2005 $20,000 of the note and $1,183 of accrued interest was converted through a settlement at a per share price of $0.029. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $1,300. On December 30, 2005 $59,074 of the note was converted per the conversion terms of the note at a per share price of $0.004875 and $0.005650. No gain or loss was recognized by the Company on the conversion. On March 8, 2006 $84,021 of the note and $8,232 of accrued interest was converted per the conversion terms of the note at per share prices of $0.004875, $0.00565, $0.0114825, and $0.013022. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On April 10, 2006 $89,648 of the note and $1,646 of accrued interest was converted per the conversion terms of the note at per share prices of $0.004875, $0.00565, $0.0114825, and $0.013022. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On May 10, 2006 $90,338 of the note and $4,269 of interest was converted per the conversion terms of the note at per share prices of $0.004875, $0.0114825, and $0.013022. No gain or loss was recognized by the Company on the conversion. On November 29, 2006 $4,836 of the note was converted per the conversion terms of the note at per share price of $0.0026145. No gain or loss was recognized by the Company on the conversion. The note was due December 16, 2005 and is currently in default and accruing default interest at the rate of 18%. At December 31, the outstanding balance on the convertible note was $812,084 plus $761,768 of accrued interest and penalties.
 
On December 28, 2004, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with 14 various entities pursuant to which the Lenders advanced an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 to the Company on January 6, 2005 in exchange for (i) 8% secured promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount, (ii) 500,000 shares of our common stock and (iii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,4687,485 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The value of the shares and warrants of $370,000 and $630,000, respectively were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The debentures are convertible into shares of common stock. The conversion price of the debentures is seventy-five percent of the lowest closing price during the five trading days ending on the trading day before the conversion date; provided, however, that in no event will such price be more than $0.10. On October 10, 2005 $137,500 of the note and $8,875 of accrued interest was converted through a settlement at a per share price of $0.029. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $8,664. On December 30, 2005 $21,667 of the note was converted per the conversion terms of the note at a per share price of $0.004875. No gain or loss was recognized by the Company on the conversion. On March 8, 2006 $26,806 of the note was converted per the conversion terms of the note at per share prices of $0.004875, $0.00565, $0.0114825, and $0.013022. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On April 10, 2006 $31,870 of the note was converted per the conversion terms of the note at per share prices of $0.004875, $0.00565, $0.0114825, and $0.013022. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion. On May 10, 2006 $36,396 of the note was converted per the conversion terms of the note at per share prices of $0.004875, $0.0114825, and $0.013022 . No gain or loss was recognized by the Company on the conversion. The note was due December 28, 2005 and is currently in default and accruing default interest at the rate of 18%.. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding balance on the convertible note was $745,461 plus $628,913 of accrued interest and penalties.

F-31

 
On January 27, 2005, the Company borrowed $300,000 from Timothy Roberts, the Company’s Chairman, under a 15% promissory note, which was payable no later than April 27, 2005. This note was settled on June 13, 2005 via a Settlement Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $95,616.
 
On January 28, 2005, the Company borrowed $135,000 under a 17% promissory note, which was payable no later than March 29, 2005. On September 15, 2005, the entire amount of the note was converted at a per share price of $0.05. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $16,926.
 
On January 31, 2005, the Company borrowed $175,000 under a 15% convertible promissory note, which is payable no later than May 10, 2005. The note is convertible into 1,000,000 million shares of common stock and the Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $175,000. The beneficial conversion was treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. In addition, the note holder is entitled to a Stock Purchase Warrant for 200,000 shares of common stock at a warrant exercise price of $0.10 per share. On June 10, 2005, the entire amount of the note was converted at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $3,416 as related to the conversion of interest.
 
On January 31, 2005, the Company borrowed $100,000 under a 15% convertible promissory note, which is payable no later than May 10, 2005. The note is convertible into 1,000,000 million shares of common stock and the Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $100,000. The beneficial conversion was treated as a discount to the note and the discount was amortized over the life of the note. In addition, the note holder is entitled to a Stock Purchase Warrant for 200,000 shares of common stock at a warrant exercise price of $0.10 per share. On June 10, 2005, the entire amount of the note was converted at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $3,309 as related to the conversion of interest.
 
On February 3, 2005, the Company borrowed $100,000 under a 15% convertible promissory note, which is payable no later than May 10, 2005. The note is convertible into 1,000,000 million shares of common stock and the Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $100,000. The beneficial conversion was treated as a discount to the note and the discount was amortized over the life of the note. In addition, the note holder is entitled to a Stock Purchase Warrant for 100,000 shares of common stock at a warrant exercise price of $0.10 per share. On June 10, 2005, the entire amount of the note was converted at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $3,272 as related to the conversion of interest.
 
On March 9, 2005, the Company borrowed $400,000 under a 10% promissory note, which was payable no later than May 9, 2005. This note was settled on June 13, 2005 via a Settlement Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.11. The Company recognized no gain or loss on the conversion.
 
On March 21, 2005, the Company borrowed $200,000 under a 17% promissory note, which was payable no later than May 20, 2005. As additional consideration, the note holder is entitled to an increase in the note holder’s previously existing Stock Purchase Warrant coverage from 150% to 200% of the number of shares obtained in the conversion at a warrant exercise price of $0.10 related to the note holder’s notes dated April 7, 2005 and May 7, 2005. The increased warrant coverage was treated as a $200,000 discount to the debenture and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. This note was settled on June 10, 2005 via a Conversion Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $62,263 as related to the conversion of interest.  In conjunction with the conversion, the Company issued 6,226,359 warrants at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. 
 
F-32

 
On April 7, 2005, the Company borrowed $300,000 under a 12% promissory note, which was payable no later than August 5, 2005. On September 15, 2005, the entire amount of the note was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.05. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $13,277.
 
On April 29, 2005, the Company borrowed $200,000 under a 17% convertible promissory note, which was payable no later than July 28, 2005. The entire amount of the note was convertible into shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per share. The beneficial conversion was treated as a $200,000 discount to the note and the discount was amortized over the life of the note. On September 15, 2005, the entire amount of the note was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.05. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $12,693.
 
On June 13, 2005, the Company borrowed $68,000 under a 17% convertible promissory note, which was payable no later than August 12, 2005. The entire amount of the note was convertible into shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per share. The beneficial conversion was treated as a $20,400 discount to the note and the discount was amortized over the life of the note. On September 15, 2005, the entire amount of the note was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.05. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $4,315.

On June 30, 2005, the Company borrowed $100,000 under a 17% promissory note, which is unsecured and was payable no later than September 28, 2005. On August 11, 2005, the entire amount of the note was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.05. The Company recognized no gain or loss on the conversion.

On September 7, 2005, the Company borrowed $50,000 under a 15% promissory note, which is unsecured and was payable no later than November 7, 2005. On November 16, 2005, the entire amount of the note was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.015. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $6,757.

On September 7, 2005, the Company borrowed $50,000 under a 15% promissory note, which is unsecured and was payable no later than November 7, 2005. On November 16, 2005, the entire amount of the note was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.015. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $6,757.

On September 13, 2005, the Company borrowed $40,000 under a 15% promissory note, which is unsecured and was payable no later than November 13, 2005. On March 29, 2006, the entire amount of the note was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.019. The Company recognized a gain on the conversion of $3,229.

On September 19, 2005, the Company borrowed $100,000 under a 15% promissory note, which is unsecured and is payable no later than November 19, 2005. The note and interest are currently in default. On July 28, 2006, the entire amount of the note and accrued interest was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.0145. A loss of $9,662 was recognized.

On November 1, 2005, the Company borrowed $15,000 under a 15% promissory note, which is unsecured and is payable no later than January 1, 2006. The interest is currently in default. On July 28, 2006, the entire amount of the note and accrued interest was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.0145. A loss of $1,449 was recognized.

On November 7, 2005, the Company borrowed $25,000 under a 15% promissory note, which is unsecured and is payable no later than December 6, 2005. On January 23, 2006, the entire amount of the note was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 at a per share price of $0.0144. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $13,327.
 
F-33

 
On December 1, 2005, the Company borrowed $10,000 under a 15% promissory note, which is unsecured and is payable no later than December 1, 2006. Interest is payable upon maturity. At June 30, 2006, the outstanding balance on the note was $10,871. On August 4, 2006, the entire amount of the note and accrued interest was converted at a per share price of $0.015. The Company recognized no gain or loss on the conversion.

On January 1, 2006, the Company converted to a promissory note $91,775, issued to Timothy Roberts, a Director, of related unpaid expense reimbursements incurred while Mr. Roberts was employed as a full-time employee. The note is unsecured and bears an 8% rate of interest. On October 24, 2006, the entire amount of the note and accrued interest was converted at a per share price of $0.0049. The Company recognized no gain or loss on the conversion.

On January 25, 2006, the Company borrowed $50,000 under a three year 5.25% unsecured promissory note with 5,000,000 warrants attached at an exercise price of $1.09. Pursuant to the SEC’s request, the associated registration statement was withdrawn on May 23, 2006. Accordingly, we were unable to obtain an effective registration and, as of June 23, 2006, were in default under the terms of the note. The note holder has accelerated the note, including a $15,000 penalty, which are due immediately. The note holder has also requested repayment for prepaid warrants of $285,000, but the Company disputes the associated claims with respect to these funds. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding balance on the note including interest and the penalty is $66,526. The note, interest and penalty are in default.

On June 30, 2006, the Company borrowed $100,000 under an 8% promissory note. The note was funded in three tranches: $20,000 (due upon mutual execution of the note), $35,000 (due twenty-one days after mutual execution), and $45,000 (due forty-two days after mutual execution). The note is due no later than two months following the final tranche (estimated at one hundred and two days after mutual execution of the note). The obligation to issue the collateral was conditioned upon prior written request of the note holder prior to the associated funding and the execution of an escrow agreement with the note holder’s attorney. The Company agreed to grant the note holder three certificates to collateralize the note of 4,000,000 shares, 7,000,000 shares, and 9,000,000 shares of common stock. The note holder has not made any requests to escrow the collateral and has not established the aforementioned escrow agreement and, accordingly, the collateral has not been presented. As additional consideration for the note, the Company agreed to (i) re-price certain pre-existing warrants, (ii) issue 1,357,800 new warrants, with a fair value of $13,952 (which has been recorded as a derivative with the initial amount treated as a discount to the note and amortized over the term of the note), to parties designated by the note holder and (iii) issue, subject to full performance of the funding obligations by note holder, to note holder an additional 10,000,000 new warrants with a fair value of $86,048 (which has been recorded as a derivative with the initial amount treated as a discount to the note and amortized over the term of the note) . The new warrants described herein and expire in five years from the effective grant date and have an exercise price of $.015 per share. On November 30, 2006, the entire amount of the note and accrued interest was converted at a per share price of $0.0051. The Company recognized a $158 gain on the conversion.

On December 7, 2006, the Company borrowed $50,000 under a 0% promissory note, but upon an event of default the maturity amount shall bear interest at the rate of 18% per annum, which is secured with a Stock Pledge Agreement and is payable no later than January 7, 2007.

On December 7, 2006, the Company borrowed $50,000 under a 0% promissory note, but upon an event of default the maturity amount shall bear interest at the rate of 18% per annum, which is secured with a Stock Pledge Agreement and is payable no later than March 7, 2007.

On December 7, 2006, the Company borrowed $50,000 under a 0% promissory note, but upon an event of default the maturity amount shall bear interest at the rate of 18% per annum, which is secured with a Stock Pledge Agreement and is payable no later than June 7, 2007.
 
Notes payable - face value
 
$
2,242,276
 
Notes payable - discount
   
0
 
 
     
 Notes payable, net
 
$
2,242,276
 

F-34

 
The discount from the face value of the promissory notes is being amortized over the life of the promissory notes as additional interest expense. During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2006, the twelve month period ended December 31, 2005 and the period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to December 31, 2006, the Company has recorded interest expense from the discounts of $150,000, $3,599,312 and $5,924,900, respectively.

All of these transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions not involving a public offering.
 
(B)  Derivative Liabilities
 
In connection with the December 2004 Financings aggregating $2.16 million, we committed to pay penalties of 2% per month for each month after an agreed upon period (approximately three months) during which we fail to cause a resale registration statement covering the underlying shares to be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission.   On December 16, 2004, we closed a transaction pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2004, with several accredited investors pursuant to which those accredited investors lent an aggregate principal amount of $1,160,000 to us in exchange for (i) 8% convertible debentures Series 04-02 in that aggregate principal amount, and (ii) Class 2004-A warrants to purchase 5,437,487 shares of our common stock, Class 2004-B warrants to purchase 5,437,487 shares of our common stock and Class 2004-C warrants to purchase 5,437,487 shares of our common stock.   The debentures bear interest at 8% per annum and mature on December 16, 2005. The conversion price of the debentures means seventy-five percent of the lowest closing price during the five trading days ending on the trading day before the conversion date.  Each of the warrants is exercisable until December 31, 2009, except that after the effective date of the registration statement which we have agreed to file for the resale of the lenders' shares, we may accelerate the expiration date of the Class B and Class C warrants to a date at least 3 trading days after the lender's receipt of that notice. The initial per share exercise prices of the warrants are: Class A - $.10; Class B - $0.75; and Class C - $1.00.   The timely and full fulfillment of our obligations pursuant to the debentures have been personally guaranteed by Timothy M. Roberts, our Chairman and a director.   In connection with this financing, we paid a finder's fee to West Hastings Limited in the amount of $92,800 and issued 232,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.50.
 
On December 28, 2004, the Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 13, 2004 and related Class A warrants, Registration Rights Agreement and debentures were amended. The material provisions are as follows:   Securities Purchase Agreement - If we complete the first tranche of a financing of no less than $12 million and in connection with such financing, retire or convert our debt (other than the convertible debentures), the conversion price of the debentures will be fixed at $0.10. In addition, the investors received an aggregate of 250,000 shares of common stock.

On December 28, 2004, we closed a transaction pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2004, with several accredited investors pursuant to which those accredited investors lent an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 to us in exchange for (i) 8% convertible debentures Series 04-03 in that aggregate principal amount, and (ii) Class 2004-A-2 warrants to purchase 4,687,485 shares of our common stock. The debentures bear interest at 8% per annum and mature one year from issuance. The conversion price of the debentures means seventy-five percent of the lowest closing price during the five trading days ending on the trading day before the conversion date.  
 
The warrants are exercisable until December 31, 2009. The per share exercise price of the warrants is $0.10.   The timely and full fulfillment of our obligations pursuant to the debentures have been personally guaranteed by Timothy M. Roberts, our Chairman and a director.   In connection with this financing, we will pay a finder's fee to West Hastings Limited in the amount of $80,000 and issued 200,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.50.
 
F-35

 
On December 28, 2004, the Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 23, 2004 and related warrants, Registration Rights Agreement and debentures were amended. The material provisions are as follows:
 
Securities Purchase Agreement - If we complete the first tranche of a financing of no less than $12 million and in connection with such financing, retire or convert our debt (other than the convertible debentures), the conversion price of the debentures will be fixed at $0.10.In addition, the investors received an aggregate of 500,000 shares of common stock. 

The debentures include certain features that are considered embedded derivative financial instruments, such as the conversion feature, events of default and a variable liquidated damages clause. These features are described below, as follows:

The debentures’ conversion feature is identified as an embedded derivative and has been bifurcated and recorded on the Company's balance sheet at its fair value;

The SPA contains certain events of default including not having 150% of the number of shares of Common Stock issuable as may be required to satisfy the conversion rights of the Holders of principal on all Unconverted Debentures outstanding at any time plus the number of shares issuable upon exercise of all outstanding Warrants held by all Holders as of such date, which is identified as an embedded derivative and has been bifurcated and recorded on the Company's balance sheet at its fair value;  

In conjunction with the debentures, the Company issued warrants to purchase 21,431,946 shares of common stock. The accounting treatment of the derivatives and warrants requires that the Company record the warrants at their fair values as of the inception date of the agreement, which totaled $9,280,565.

The initial fair value assigned to the embedded derivatives and warrants was $14,463,615. The Company recorded the first $1,730,000 of fair value of the derivatives and warrants to debt discount which will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the debenture. The Company recorded an amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2006, the year ended December 31, 2005 and from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through December 31, 2006 of $0, $2,104,110and $2,160,000, respectively.
 
The market price of the Company's common stock significantly impacts the extent to which the Company may be required or may be permitted to convert the unrestricted and restricted portions of the debenture into shares of the Company's common stock. The lower the market price of the Company's common stock at the respective times of conversion, the more shares the Company will need to issue to convert the principal and interest payments then due on the debenture. If the market price of the Company's common stock falls below certain thresholds, the Company will be unable to convert any such repayments of principal and interest into equity, and the Company will be forced to make such repayments in cash. The Company's operations could be materially adversely impacted if the Company is forced to make repeated cash payments on the debenture.

In summary, the year ended December 31, 2006, the year ended December 31, 2005 and from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through December 31, 2006, the Company recorded a gain/(loss) on derivatives of $(695,584), $20,282,457and $(2,912,528), respectively, as a result of the financing described above in accordance with guidance provided in EITF 00-19:
 
Promissory notes, original face amount
 
$
2,160,000
 
Conversions
   
602,455
 
Promissory notes at 12/31/06
   
1,557,545
 
Unamortized discount on Promissory notes, at 12/31/06
   
0
 
Promissory notes, at 12/31/06
   
1,557,545
 

F-36

 
On January 25, 2006, we completed a private placement pursuant to which we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Golden Gate Investors, Inc. (“Golden Gate”) dated as of January 24, 2006, as amended by that certain Addendum to Convertible Debenture, Warrant to Purchase Common Stock and Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 24, 2006, for the sale of (i) a $50,000 principal amount convertible debenture and (ii) a warrant to purchase 5,000,000 shares of our common stock. Golden Gate provided us with an aggregate of $130,000 in gross proceeds upon the execution of final definitive agreements. Upon notification that the registration statement (as described below) has been filed with the SEC by February 14, 2006, Golden Gate shall wire us $150,000. If the registration statement is filed later than February 14, 2006, Golden Gate shall wire us $50,000. These amounts shall represent a prepayment towards the exercise of the warrant.

The debenture bears interest at 5¼%, mature three years from the date of issuance, is convertible into our common stock, at Golden Gate’s option. The convertible debenture is convertible into the number of our shares of common stock equal to the dollar amount of the debenture being converted multiplied by 110, less the product of the conversion price multiplied by 100 times the dollar amount of the debenture being converted, which is divided by the conversion price. The conversion price for the convertible debenture is the lesser of (i) $0.10, (ii) eighty percent of the average of the three lowest volume weighted average prices during the twenty (20) trading days prior to the conversion or (iii) eighty percent of the volume weighted average price on the trading day prior to the conversion. Beginning in the first full month that the registration statement covering the shares of common stock underlying the debenture and warrant is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Golden Gate is obligated to convert at least 5%, but no more than 10%, of the face value of the debenture per calendar month into shares of our common stock, so long as the shares are available, registered and freely tradable. If Golden Gate converts more than 5% of the face value of the debenture in any calendar month, the excess over 5% shall be credited against the next month’s minimum conversion amount. In the event that Golden Gate does not convert at least 5% of the face value of the debenture in any calendar month, Golden Gate shall not be entitled to collect interest on the debenture for that month and shall not be entitled to receive shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the debenture, provided that we provide Golden Gate with written notice of such failure to convert the minimum monthly conversion amount. However, in the event that our volume weighted average price is less than $.01, we will have the option to prepay the debenture at 130% rather than have the debenture converted. If we elect to prepay the debenture, Golden Gate may withdraw its conversion notice.

In addition, beginning in the first full month that the registration statement covering the shares of common stock underlying the debenture and warrant is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Golden Gate is obligated to exercise the warrant concurrently with the submission of a conversion notice by Golden Gate with respect to the debenture, in the same percentage of the debenture being converted. If Golden Gate exercises more than 5% of the warrants in any calendar month, the excess over 5% shall be credited against the next month’s minimum exercise amount. In the event Golden Gate does not exercise the warrant concurrently with the conversion of the debenture, it shall not be entitled to receive shares of our common stock for the portion of the debenture being simultaneously converted. The warrant is exercisable into 5,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.09 per share. Accordingly, if all warrants are exercised by Golden Gate, we will receive $5,450,000 in proceeds.
 
Golden Gate has contractually agreed to restrict its ability to convert its debenture or exercise its warrants and receive shares of our common stock such that the number of shares of common stock held by them and their affiliates after such conversion or exercise does not exceed 9.99% of the then issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

The debenture includes certain features that are considered embedded derivative financial instruments, such as the conversion feature, events of default and a variable liquidated damages clause. These features are described below, as follows:
 
F-37

 
- The debenture’s' conversion feature is identified as an embedded derivative and has been bifurcated and recorded on the Company's balance sheet at its fair value;
 
- The SPA includes a penalty provision based on any failure to meet registration requirements for shares issuable under the conversion of the debenture or exercise of the warrants, which represents an embedded derivative, but such derivative has a de minimus value and has not been recorded in the accompanying financial statements; and
 
- The SPA contains certain events of default including not having adequate shares registered to effectuate allowable conversions; in that event, the Company is required to pay a conversion default payment at 130% of the then outstanding principal balance on the debenture, which is identified as an embedded derivative, but such derivative has a de minimus value and has not been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
In conjunction with the debenture, the Company issued warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock. The accounting treatment of the derivatives and warrants requires that the Company record the warrants at their fair values as of the inception date of the agreement, which totaled $4,026.
 
The initial fair value assigned to the embedded derivatives and warrants was $473,873. The Company recorded the first $50,000 of fair value of the derivatives and warrants to debt discount which will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the debenture. The Company recorded an amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2006, the year ended December 31, 2005 and from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through December 31, 2006 of $50,000, $0 and $50,000, respectively.
 
The market price of the Company's common stock significantly impacts the extent to which the Company may be required or may be permitted to convert the unrestricted and restricted portions of the debenture into shares of the Company's common stock. The lower the market price of the Company's common stock at the respective times of conversion, the more shares the Company will need to issue to convert the principal and interest payments then due on the debenture. If the market price of the Company's common stock falls below certain thresholds, the Company will be unable to convert any such repayments of principal and interest into equity, and the Company will be forced to make such repayments in cash. The Company's operations could be materially adversely impacted if the Company is forced to make repeated cash payments on the debenture.

In summary, the year ended December 31, 2006, the year ended December 31, 2005 and from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through December 31, 2006, the Company recorded a gain/(loss) on derivatives of $(2,358,048), $0 and $(2,358,048), respectively, as a result of the financing described above in accordance with guidance provided in EITF 00-19:
Promissory notes - short term, original face amount
 
$
50,000
 
Conversions
   
-
 
Promissory notes - short term, at 12/31/06
   
50,000
 
Unamortized discount on Promissory notes - short term, at 12/31/06
   
-
 
Promissory notes, net - short term, at 12/31/06
   
50,000
 
 
Additionally, as a result of the issuance of the debenture with such terms, there is no explicit number of shares that are to be delivered upon satisfaction of conversion, the Company is unable to assert that it had sufficient authorized and unissued shares to settle such note. Accordingly, all of the Company's previously issued and outstanding instruments, such as warrants and options as well as those issued in the future, would be classified as liabilities as well, effective with the issuance of the convertible promissory note. Absent other transactions which would warrant the same accounting treatment, the Company will discontinue the recognition of derivative liabilities once it can assert that it has a sufficient amount of authorized and unissued shares to settle its obligations which can be settled in shares . Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement with Golden Gate, until such time as the Company receives shareholder approval to increase its authorized shares of common stock, it’s obligation to reserve and deliver, if requested, common stock from a conversion of the debenture or warrants shall not exceed 50,000,000 shares. Pursuant to the SEC’s request, the associated registration statement was withdrawn on May 23, 2006. Accordingly, we were unable to obtain an effective registration and, as of June 23, 2006, were in default under the terms of the note. The note holder has accelerated the note, including a $15,000 penalty, which were due upon notice in July 2006. At December 31, 2006, the outstanding balance on the note including interest and the penalty is $66,526.

F-38

 
On September 22, 2006 an amendment to a February 2004 $1,400,000 debenture was effected allowing the noteholder the right to convert principal and accrued interest into common stock. The conversion feature allows for conversion at a 22.5% discount to market for the first $310,000 of market value and a 15% discount to market thereafter. The interest rate was amended to 17%.

The initial fair value assigned to the embedded derivatives was $464,393.

The market price of the Company's common stock significantly impacts the extent to which the Company may be required or may be permitted to convert the debenture into shares of the Company's common stock. The lower the market price of the Company's common stock at the respective times of conversion, the more shares the Company will need to issue to convert the principal and interest payments then due on the debenture. If the market price of the Company's common stock falls below certain thresholds, the Company will be unable to convert any such repayments of principal and interest into equity. The debenture is secured with the assets of the Company. The Company's operations could be materially adversely impacted if the assets are encumbered due to the default on the debenture.

In summary, the year ended December 31, 2006, the year ended December 31, 2005 and from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through December 31, 2006, the Company recorded a gain/(loss) on derivatives of $(443,138), $0 and $(443,138), respectively, as a result of the financing described above in accordance with guidance provided in EITF 00-19:
 
Promissory notes, original face amount
 
$
1,400,000
 
Conversions
   
915,269
 
Promissory notes at 12/31/06
   
484,731
 
Unamortized discount on Promissory notes, at 12/31/06
   
-
 
Promissory notes, at 12/31/06
   
484,731
 
 
As of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 the fair value of all other outstanding warrants was $73,442 and $312,863, respectively. The difference of $239,421 was recorded as a gain on derivatives as provided for in EITF 00-19.  In summary, the year ended December 31, 2006, the year ended December 31, 2005 and from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through December 31, 2006, the Company recorded a gain/(loss) on derivatives of $239,421, $18,447,767 and $4,280,176, respectively, as a result of all other outstanding warrants in accordance with guidance in EITF 00-19.
 
In summary the gain or (loss) on derivatives is as follows:

 
 
Date of Note
 
  For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2006
 
For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2005
 
For the Period
from
December 9, 2002
(Inception) to
December 31,
2006
 
December 2004
 
$
(695,584
)
$
20,282,457
   
($2,912,530
)
January 2006
   
(2,358,048
)
 
-
   
(2,358,048
)
February 2004 as amended September 2006
   
(443,138
)
 
-
   
(443,138
)
All other warrants
   
239,421
   
18,447,767
   
4,280,176
 
Total
 
$
(3,257,349
)
$
38,730,224
 
$
(1,433,540
)

F-39


In summary the notes outstanding at December 31, 2006 were:
 
Conversion Feature
 
Face Amount Of Note
 
Unamortized Discount
 
Conversions
 
Notes, net
 
Yes
 
 
2,160,000
 
 
 
 
 
602,455
 
 
1,557,545
 
Yes
 
 
50,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50,000
 
Yes
 
 
1,400,000
 
 
 
 
 
915,269
 
 
484,731
 
No
 
 
50,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50,000
 
No
   
50,000
 
             
50,000
 
No
 
 
50,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
50,000
 
Promissory notes, net - short term, at 12/31/06
 
 
3,760,000
 
 
 
 
 
1,517,724
 
 
2,242,276
 

 
NOTE 6   STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

(A) Stock Issued for Cash
 
During 2002, the Company issued 58,189,728 shares of common stock to its founder for $18,522 ($0.0004 per share).
 
During 2003, the Company issued 4,423,012 shares of common stock for cash of $526,703 ($0.12 per share).
 
During 2003, the Company issued 1,748,380 shares of common stock for $545,717 ($0.28 per share), net of offering costs of $11,239.
 
During 2003, the Company issued 420,768 shares of common stock for $66,672 ($0.16 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 6,650,000 shares of common stock for $1,662,500 ($0.25 per share).
  
During 2004, the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock for cash of $100,000 ($2.50 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 1,900,400 shares of common stock for $475,100 ($0.25 per share). In connection with this transaction, the Company issued 2,022,900 warrants to purchase common stock exercisable at a price of $0.25. The warrants are fully exercisable at any time for a period of five years after the closing date of the sale. None of the warrants were executed, forfeited or expired in 2005. Therefore, all 2,022,900 warrants were outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2005.
 
F-40

 
On August 26, 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for $200,000 ($2.00 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 1,649,635 shares of common stock for $264,075 ($0.16 per share).
 
(B) Stock Issued for Services

During 2002, the Company issued 2,957,376 shares of common stock for software development services valued for financial accounting purposes at $1,113,005 ($0.3775 per share) based upon recent cash offering prices.
 
During 2003, the Company issued 434,036 shares of common stock for software development services valued for financial accounting purposes at $138,640 ($0.3175 per share) based upon recent cash offering prices.
 
During 2003, the Company issued 942,600 shares of common stock for signature rights valued for financial accounting purposes at $300,000 ($0.3175 per share) based upon recent cash offering prices.

During 2004, the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock for software development and consulting services with a fair value of $2,581,250 ($1.475 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 279,260 shares of common stock for services with a fair value of $446,816 ($1.60 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 830,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to three consultants having a fair value of $1,195,200 ($1.44 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 440,000 shares of restricted common stock for services with a fair value of $404,800 ($.92 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of our restricted common stock for services with a fair value of $147,500 ($1.475 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 1,933,224 shares to consultants for services with a fair value of $1,162,444 ($0.60 per share).

On July 28, 2004, as consideration for the personal guaranty of a note payable by Richard Angelotti, a director,, the Company issued the Director 800,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $832,000 ($1.04 per share). The shares were restricted shares of common stock and, therefore, were not tradable at the time of issuance. These shares of common stock issued to the Director may become unrestricted on July 28, 2005.

During August 2004, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares to consultants for real estate service with a fair value of $1,130,000 ($1.13 per share).
 
During August 2004, the Company issued 21,460 shares to a consultant for services with a fair value of $13,734 ($0.64 per share).

During August, 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares to a consultant for financial services with a fair value of $122,000 ($0.61 per share).

F-41

 
During August 2004, the Company issued 36,000 shares to a consultant for engineering services with a fair value of $21,420 ($0.60 per share).

On September 30, 2004, the Company issued 300,000 shares of restricted common stock to employees as a bonus with a fair value of $99,000 ($0.33 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 1,790,000 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $565,500 ($0.32 per share) for bonuses.
 
During 2004, the Company issued 5,199,967 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $1,137,099 ($0.22 per share) as regular compensation.

During 2004, the Company issued 1,100,000 shares of common stock to executives with a fair value of $240,542 ($0.22 per share) as compensation.

During 2004, the Company issued 3,885,410 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $812,141 ($0.21 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 1,350,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $377,500 ($0.28 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock for advisory services with a fair value of $37,500 ($0.25 per share).

On January 4, 2005, the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock to Richard Angelotti, a Director, for services with a fair value of $63,600 ($1.59 per share).
 
During January 2005, the Company issued 125,179 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $108,929 ($0.87 per share).

On January 28, 2005, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $648,000 ($0.54 per share).

On March 10, 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $32,000 ($0.32 per share).

On March 11, 2005, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock to Richard Angelotti, a Director, for services with a fair value of $272,000 ($0.34 per share).

During March 2005, the Company issued 1,722,453 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $558,847 ($0.32 per share) of which $19,665 was considered deferred compensation.

On March 28, 2005, the Company issued 225,000 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $56,250 ($0.25 per share) as compensation.

During April 2005, the Company issued 1,423,734 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $319,955 ($0.22 per share).
 
During April 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock to employees as a bonus with a fair value of $23,000 ($0.23 per share).

F-42

 
On April 18, 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $45,000 ($0.18 per share).

During April 2005, the Company issued 601,725 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $90,259 ($0.15 per share) as regular compensation.
 
During April 2005, the Company issued 678,067 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $101,310 ($0.15 per share) as regular compensation.

During May 2005, the Company issued 2,255,097 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $338,775 ($0.15 per share).

During May 2005, the Company issued 962,324 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $143,340 ($0.15 per share) as regular compensation.

During May 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to an executive with a fair value of $37,500 ($0.15 per share) as compensation.
 
During May 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to an executive with a fair value of $37,500 ($0.15 per share) as compensation.

During May 2005, the Company issued 1,162,720 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $139,526 ($0.12 per share) as regular compensation.

During June 2005, the Company issued 2,122,675 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $178,400 ($0.08 per share) as regular compensation.

During June 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to an executive with a fair value of $25,000 ($0.10 per share) as compensation.
 
During June 2005, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock to an executive with a fair value of $50,000 ($0.10 per share) as compensation.

During June 2005, the Company issued 2,934,536 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $322,635 ($0.11 per share).

During July 2005, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $50,000 ($0.10 per share) of which $10,000 was considered deferred compensation.

During July 2005, the Company issued 32,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $3,072 ($0.096 per share).

During July 2005, the Company issued 22,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $1,851 ($0.084 per share).

During July 2005, the Company issued 72,223 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $6,500 ($0.09 per share).

During July 2005, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $4,302 ($0.086 per share).
 
F-43

 
During July 2005, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $5,000 ($0.10 per share).

During July 2005, the Company issued 2,767,036 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $195,292 ($0.07 per share).

During August 2005, the Company issued 182,799 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $12,796 ($0.07 per share).

During August 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $6,500 ($0.65 per share).

During August 2005, the Company issued 1,891,655 shares of common stock to executives with a fair value of $132,416 ($0.07 per share) as compensation.

During August 2005, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $10,500 ($0.07 per share) as compensation.

During August 2005, the Company issued 492,940 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $39,435 ($0.08 per share) as compensation.

During August 2005, the Company issued 333,340 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $30,000 ($0.09 per share) as compensation.

During August 2005, the Company issued 86,667 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $6,500 ($0.075 per share) as compensation.

During August 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.06 per share).

During August 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to an employee with a fair value of $7,000 ($0.07 per share).

During August 2005, the Company issued 2,399,879 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $167,992 ($0.07 per share) of which $140,000 was considered deferred compensation.

During August 2005, the Company issued 62,500 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $5,625 ($0.09 per share).
 
During August 2005, the Company issued 53,571 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $3,214 ($0.06 per share).

During August 2005, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $52,500 ($0.07 per share).

During August 2005, the Company issued 2,600,000 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $182,000 ($0.07 per share).

During August 2005, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock to Richard Angelotti, a Director, with a fair value of $350,000 ($0.07 per share).

F-44

 
During August 2005, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Timothy Roberts, then the CEO and currently the Chairman and a Director, with a fair value of $700,000 ($0.07 per share).
 
During September 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $15,000 ($0.06 per share).

During September 2005, the Company issued 1,629,027 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $81,451 ($0.05 per share) of which $27,505 was considered deferred compensation.

During September 2005, the Company issued 5,415,729 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $297,865 ($0.055 per share) of which $85,758 was considered deferred compensation.

During September 2005, the Company issued 3,045,708 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $152,286 ($0.05 per share) of which $44,648 was considered deferred compensation.

During September 2005, the Company issued 3,977,894 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $179,005 ($0.045 per share) of which $50,058 was considered deferred compensation.

During October 2005, the Company issued 264,822 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $8,474 ($0.032 per share).

During October 2005, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $14,500 ($0.029 per share).

During October 2005, the Company issued 1,536,850 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $30,737 ($0.02 per share).

During October 2005, the Company issued 15,299,873 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $382,497 ($0.025 per share) of which $112,695 was considered deferred compensation.

During October 2005, the Company issued 699,780 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $19,594 ($0.028 per share).

During November 2005, the Company issued 2,247,956 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $49,455 ($0.022 per share).

During November 2005, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $24,000 ($0.024 per share).

During November 2005, the Company issued 6,380,900 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $133,999 ($0.021 per share) of which $91,165 was considered deferred compensation.

During November 2005, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $30,000 ($0.015 per share).
 
During November 2005, the Company issued 1,134,261 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $24,953 ($0.022 per share) of which $5,328 was considered deferred compensation.

During December 2005, the Company issued 10,694,577 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $213,892 ($0.02 per share) of which $188,510 was considered deferred compensation.

F-45

 
During December 2005, the Company issued 30,342,931 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $595,604 ($0.02 per share) of which $176,513 was considered deferred compensation.
 
During January 2006, the Company issued 510,992 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $8,533 ($0.0167 per share).

During January 2006, the Company issued 2,789,474 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $58,578 ($0.021 per share).

During January 2006, the Company issued 7,030,932 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $133,588 ($.019 per share).

During February 2006, the Company issued 6,327,718 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $113,899 ($0.018 per share).

During February 2006, the Company issued 5,862,640 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $105,224 ($.018 per share).

During February 2006, the Company issued restricted common stock for 372,414 shares as a fee for obtaining financing. The fair value was $5,400 ($0.0145 per share).

During February 2006, the Company issued 6,327,718 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $113,898 ($0.018 per share).

During March 2006, the Company issued 255,319 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $6,000 ($0.0235 per share).

During March 2006, the Company issued 646,552 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $12,931 ($0.02 per share).

During March 2006, the Company issued 4,060,913 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $80,000 ($0.0197 per share).

During March 2006, the Company issued 1,724,138 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $35,000 ($0.0203 per share).

During March 2006, the Company issued restricted common stock for 243,243 shares as a fee for obtaining financing. The fair value was $4,500 ($0.0185 per share).

During March 2006, the Company issued 9,650,377 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $226,784 ($.0235 per share).

During March 2006, the Company returned to the Treasury 49,752 shares of common stock previously issued to employees with a fair value of $995 ($.02 per share).

During March 2006, the Company issued 5,219,112 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $102,817 ($.0197 per share).

During April 2006, the Company issued 589,051 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $11,533 ($0.0196 per share).

F-46

 
During June 2006, the Company issued 1,853,497 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $22,150 ($0.012 per share).

During June 2006, the Company issued 6,830,929 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $95,633 ($.014 per share).

During July 2006, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $330,000 ($0.0165 per share).

During August 2006, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $26,000 ($0.013 per share).

During September 2006, the Company issued 18,382,249 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $180,146 ($0.0098 per share).

During September 2006, the Company issued 4,318,009 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $42,317 ($0.0098 per share).

During October 2006, the Company issued 19,758,376 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $72,863 ($0.0037 per share).

During October 2006, the Company issued 51,479,252 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $273,468 ($0.0053 per share).

During November 2006, the Company issued 29,197,010 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $115,560 ($0.0040 per share).
 
During November 2006, the Company issued 1,454,258 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $4,799 ($0.0033 per share).

During November 2006, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock to Greg Koler, the CEO, with a fair value of $66,000 ($0.0033 per share).

During November 2006, the Company issued 9,000,000 shares of common stock to Greg Koler, the CEO, with a fair value of $34,200 ($0.0038 per share).

During November 2006, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Greg Koler, the CEO, with a fair value of $3,600 ($0.0036 per share).

(C) Unauthorized Stock Issued

During November 2006 and without the requisite approval of the Board of Directors, 56,000,000 shares of common stock were issued with a fair value of $194,800 ($0.0035 per share).

(D) Stock Issued for Legal Settlement

During February 2004, the Company issued 66,668 shares of common stock with a fair value of $98,335 ($1.475 per share) in partial settlement of a lawsuit.

On June 4, 2004, the Company issued 53,332 shares of common stock with a fair value of $77,565 in final settlement of a lawsuit ($1.455 per share).

F-47

 
During June 2005, the Company returned 120,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $175,900 ($1.475 per share) were returned to Treasury in settlement of a lawsuit.

On July 26, 2006, the Company issued 4,242,820 shares of common stock with a fair value of $70,006 ($0.0165 per share) in final settlement of a lawsuit. A loss of $18,270 was recognized on the settlement. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

(E) Stock Issued for Vendor Settlement

During May 2005, the Company issued 1,976,021 shares of common stock with a fair value of $316,163 ($0.16 per share) in settlement of a vendor payable.

During August 2005, the Company issued 2,549,075 shares of common stock with a fair value of $229,417 ($0.09 per share) in settlement of the 2005 rent for the Sarasota office. Of this amount $52,631 was considered deferred compensation.

During August 2005, the Company issued 368,375 shares of common stock with a fair value of $29,470 ($0.08 per share) in settlement of a vendor payable.

During September 2005, the Company settled the outstanding amounts plus related legal fees with a vendor by issuing 6,361,113 shares of common stock with a fair value of $311,695 ($0.049 per share) on the date of settlement. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

During November 2005, the Company settled the outstanding amounts plus legal fees with a vendor by issuing 5,071,175 shares of common stock with a fair value of $111,566 ($0.022 per share). The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

During November 2005, the Company settled the outstanding amounts plus legal fees with a vendor by issuing 1,134,775 shares of common stock with a fair value of $24,965 ($0.022 per share). The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

During March 2006, the Company issued 2,195,905 shares of common stock in full settlement of amounts due to a vendor. The fair value was $52,702 ($0.024 per share) and a gain of $2,673 was recognized on the settlement. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

During June 2006, the Company issued 30,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $375,000 ($0..0125 per share) in settlement of the 2006 rent for the Sarasota office. Of this amount $94,670 was considered deferred compensation and $191,245 was an early termination fee. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933. The party holding a majority interest in the landlord is also, on a personal basis, a past and current investor in the Company.

On August 4, 2006, the Company issued 1,663,536 shares of common stock with a fair value of $24,953 ($0.015 per share) in settlement of unreimbursed employee expenses owed to a terminated employee. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion.

On September 25, 2006 the Company issued 9,396,064 shares of common stock with a fair value of $93,961 ($0.01 per share) in settlement of unpaid rent. A gain of $6,039 was recognized on the settlement. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

F-48

 
(F) Stock Issued for Cash with Notes Payable

During 2004, the Company issued 560,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $434,000 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($0.78 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $284,000 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.42 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $147,500 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.475 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 60,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $67,800 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.13 per share).
  
During 2004, the Company issued 33,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $47,190 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.43 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 511,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $753,725 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.475 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 7,500 shares of common stock with a fair value of $11,025 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.47 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $735,000 as additional consideration for notes payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the notes ($0.42 per share).

(G) Stock Issued for Cash as Interest on Notes Payable

During 2004, the Company issued 375,000 shares to note payable holders for accrued interest on the notes with a fair value of $67,500 ($0.18 per share).

During August 2005, the Company issued 7,114,667 shares to a note payable holder for accrued interest on the note with a fair value of $384,192 ($0.054 per share). The Company recognized no gain or loss on this transaction.
 
F-49

 
(H) Stock Issued Under Loan Default Provisions

During 2004, the Company issued 74,999 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $110,624 ($1.475 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 75,000 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $84,750 ($1.13 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 80,000 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $118,000 ($1.475 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 603,038 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $942,548 ($1.56 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 955,312 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $1,404,309 ($1.47 per share).
 
(I) Stock Issued for Conversion of Notes Payable

On January 6, 2005, the Company issued 7,043,750 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $8,311,625 ($1.18 per share). The note and accrued interest totaled $704,375 which was converted into equity at $0.10 per share. The Company recognized a loss of $7,607,250 ($1.08 per share) on the conversion of this note.

On February 11, 2005, the Company issued 4,925,291 shares of common stock with a fair value of $1,797,731 to convert a note payable with a fair value of $1,058,938 ($0.215 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $738,794 ($0.15 per share) on the conversion of this note.

On March 22, 2005, the Company issued 5,815,069 shares of common stock with a fair value of $711,918 to convert a note payable with a fair value of $581,507 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $130,411 ($0.022 per share) on the conversion of this note.
  
On April 11, 2005, the Company issued 13,325,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $2,281,933 to convert a note payable with a fair value of $1,565,000 ($0.12 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $716,933 ($0.05 per share) on the conversion of this note.

During April 2005, the Company issued 2,936,644 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $293,664 ($0.10 per share).

On May 10, 2005, the Company issued 3,961,170 shares of common stock with a fair value of $633,787 to convert a note payable with a fair value of $475,340 ($0.12 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $158,447 ($0.04 per share) on the conversion of this note.

On May 10, 2005, the Company issued 3,700,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $592,000 to convert a note payable with a fair value of $370,000 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $222,000 ($0.06 per share) on the conversion of this note.

On May 16, 2005, the Company issued 5,900,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $826,418 to convert a note payable with a fair value of $560,918 ($0.095 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $265,500 ($0.045 per share) on the conversion of this note.
 
On May 16, 2005, the Company issued 12,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $1,686,836 to convert a note payable with a fair value of $1,146,836 ($0.095 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $540,000 ($0.045 per share) on the conversion of this note.

F-50

 
During June 2005, the Company issued 3,695,339 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $404,011 ($0.11 per share).

On June 10, 2005, the Company issued 2,075,453 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $207,545 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $62,263 on the conversion of this note. 

On June 10, 2005, the Company issued 3,187,206 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $318,721 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $95,616 on the conversion of this note.

On June 10, 2005, the Company issued 1,110,298 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $111,030 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $3,309 on the conversion of this note.

On June 10, 2005, the Company issued 1,109,069 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $110,907 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $3,272 on the conversion of this note.
 
On June 10, 2005, the Company issued 1,863,852 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $186,385 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $3,416 on the conversion of this note.

On August 11, 2005, the Company issued 2,096,623 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $104,831 ($0.05 per share). The Company recognized no gain or loss on the conversion of this note.

On September 15, 2005, the Company issued 12,882,049 shares of common stock to convert three notes payable with a fair value of $608,054 ($0.0472 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $36,048 on the conversion of these notes.

On September 15, 2005, the Company issued 3,385,259 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $152,337 ($0.045 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $16,926 on the conversion of this note.

On October 10, 2005, the Company issued 7,246,455 shares of common stock to convert notes payable with a fair value of $210,148 ($0.029). The Company recognized a loss of $9,964 on the partial conversion of the notes.

On November 16, 2005, the Company issued 7,948,856 shares of common stock to convert notes payable with a fair value of $119,233 ($0.015 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $13,513 on the conversion of the notes.
 
On December 30, 2005, the Company issued 16,000,000 shares of common stock to convert notes payable in the amount of $80,741 as per the conversion terms of the note. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion.

On January 23, 2006, the Company issued 2,900,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $41,760 ($.0144 per share) in settlement of a note and accrued interest.  The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

On March 29, 2006, the Company issued 1,636,330 shares of common stock in full settlement of a note and accrued interest. The fair value was $31,090 ($0.019 per share) and a gain of $3,229 was recognized on the settlement. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

F-51

 
On March 9, 2006, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock and on March 21, 2006 an additional 30,000,000 shares of common stock in partial conversion of a note and accrued interest. The fair value was $860,000 (10,000,000 shares at $0.026 and 30,000,000 shares at $0.02 per share) and a loss of $285,498 was recognized on the conversion.

On March 8, 2006, the Company issued 19,999,999 shares of common stock in partial conversion of notes and accrued interest. Principal and interest in the amount of $119,059 was converted per the conversion terms of the note (the various conversion prices were $0.004875, $0.00565, $0.0114825 and $0.013022 per share). No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion.

On April 10, 2006, the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of common stock in partial conversion of notes and accrued interest. Principal and interest in the amount of $123,164 was converted per the conversion terms of the note (the various conversion prices were $0.004875, $0.00565, $0.0114825 and $0.013022 per share). No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion.

On May 10, 2006, the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of common stock in partial conversion of notes and accrued interest. Principal and interest in the amount of $131,302 was converted per the conversion terms of the note (the various conversion prices were $0.004875, $0.0114825 and $0.013022 per share). No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion.

On August 3, 2006, the Company issued 10,027,731 shares of common stock in full settlement of notes and accrued interest. The fair value was $145,402 ($0.0145 per share). Principal and interest in the amount of $131,791 were converted. A loss of $11,111 was recognized on the conversion. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

On August 4, 2006, the Company issued 42,393,246 shares of common stock in full settlement of notes and accrued interest. The fair value was $635,898 ($0.015 per share). Principal and interest in the amount of $635,898 were converted and no gain or loss was recognized.

On September 6, 2006, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock in partial settlement of a note and accrued interest. The fair value was $120,000 ($0.012 per share). Principal and interest in the amount of $89,551 were converted and a loss of $30,449 was recognized on the conversion.

On September 29, 2006, the Company issued 1,100,000 shares of common stock in partial settlement of principal. Principal in the amount of $8,056 was converted and no gain or loss was recognized.

During October 2006, the Company issued 69,172,000 shares of common stock in partial settlement of principal and interest aggregating $315,535 ($0.0046 per share). Principal in the amount of $301,967 and interest in the amount of $13,568 was converted and no gain or loss was recognized.

During November 2006, the Company issued 49,728,000 shares of common stock in partial settlement of principal and interest aggregating $203,589 ($0.0041 per share). Principal in the amount of $199,751 and interest in the amount of $3,838 was converted and no gain or loss was recognized.

During November 2006, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock in full settlement of a note and accrued interest. The fair value was $102,000 ($0.0051 per share). Principal and interest in the amount of $102,158 was converted and a $158 gain was recognized.

During November 2006, the Company issued 19,940,582 shares of common stock in full settlement of a note and accrued interest. The fair value was $97,709 ($0.0049 per share) and no gain or loss was recognized.

F-52

 
During November 2006, the Company issued 1,849,568 shares of common stock in partial settlement of principal. Principal in the amount of $4,836 ($0.0026 per share) was converted and no gain or loss was recognized.

(J) In Kind Contribution

During 2004, 1,191,450 shares of common stock were returned to the Company by a stockholder and recorded as an In Kind Contribution.
 
(K) Stock Dividend
 
During January 2004, the Company declared a 4 for 1 common stock dividend effected to stockholders of record on January 19, 2004. Per share and weighted average share amounts have been retroactively restated in the accompanying financial statements and related notes to reflect this dividend.
 
(L) Stock Split
 
During May 2004, the Company declared a 4 for 1 common stock split effected to stockholders of record on May 5, 2004. Per share and weighted average share amounts have been retroactively restated in the accompanying financial statements and related notes to reflect this dividend.
 
(M) Stock Issued in Reverse Merger

On January 5, 2004, the Company issued 16,156,000 shares of common stock for all the outstanding shares of Global Business Resources.

All of these transactions were exempt from registration requirements of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions not involving a public offering.

(N) Obligation to Reserve Stock

As of December 31, 2006, the Company had an obligation to reserve 3,362,020,967 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of debentures. In addition, as of December 31, 2006, the Company had outstanding warrants totaling 76,686,612 shares of common stock.
 
(O) Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
 
On February 24, 2005, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to provide for an increase in its authorized share capital. The authorized capital stock increased to 600,000,000 common shares at a par value of $0.0001 per share.

On July 13, 2006, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to provide for an increase in its authorized share capital. The authorized capital stock increased from 600,000,000 to 1,200,000,000 common shares at a par value of $0.0001 per share.
 
NOTE 7   INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense (benefit) is summarized as follows:

F-53

 
   
Year Ended
December 31, 2006
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2005
 
December 9, 2002
(Inception) through
December 31, 2006
 
Current:
             
Federal
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
State
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Deferred - Federal and State
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Income tax expense (benefit)
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
 

 
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2006
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2005
 
December 9, 2002
(Inception) through
December 31, 2006
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Federal income tax expense (benefit)
 
$
(2,233,989
)
$
(6,515,075
)
$
(22,400,407
)
Effect on net operating loss carryforward
   
2,233,989
   
6,515,075
   
22,400,407
 
 
  $ -  
$
-
 
$
-
 
 
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
 
 
December 31,
2006
 
December 31,
2005
 
Deferred tax assets:
         
Net operating loss carry forward
 
$
22,400,407
 
$
20,166,418
 
Total gross deferred tax assets
   
22,400,407
   
20,166,418
 
Less valuation allowance
   
(22,400,407
)
 
(20,166,418
)
 
         
Net deferred tax assets
 
$
-
 
$
-
 

At December 31, 2006, the Company had a net operating loss carry forward of $59,528,055 for U.S. Federal income tax purposes available to offset future taxable income expiring through 2026. The net change in the valuation allowance during the year ended December 31, 2006 was an increase of $2,233,989.

NOTE 8 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(A) Distribution Agreements

Riverdeep, Inc .
 
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with Riverdeep, Inc. ("Riverdeep") dated October 23, 2003 that was intended to allow Infinium to market Riverdeep's catalog of award-winning video games and edutainment software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expired on March 30, 2006 and when in place authorized Infinium to distribute Riverdeep's products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles were intended to be available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.

F-54

 
The agreement with Riverdeep required Infinium to make the following guaranteed, non-refundable, irrevocable, non-transferable license fees as follows:
 
March 30, 2004
 
$
50,000
 
September 30, 2004
   
50,000
 
September 30, 2004
   
125,000
 
 
     
Total
 
$
225,000
 

In addition, Infinium would have incurred license fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit license fees would have applied against the aforementioned guaranteed license fees. If the guaranteed license fees would have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium would have paid directly to Riverdeep the per unit license fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit unlimited license (pay-to-own) fee ranges from $6.50 to $28.00 per title. The per unit limited license (pay-per-play) fee equals fifty percent (50%) of Infinium's revenue realized from the limited licenses granted to end users.
  
As the Company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the payments for the guaranteed license fees, the company has expensed the guaranteed license fees as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through December 31, 2006, $225,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

In the event that the per unit license fees were to exceed the guaranteed license fees, those per unit license fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned.

The Company is currently in default of this agreement.

Codemasters Software Company Ltd.
 
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with The Codemasters Software Company Ltd. (“Codemasters”) dated December 3, 2004 that will allow Infinium to market Codemasters’ catalog of video games software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expired on December 31, 2005 and authorized Infinium to distribute Codemasters’ products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles were to be available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.

The agreement with Codemasters required Infinium to make the following advance royalty payments as follows:
 
November 21, 2004
 
$
25,000
 
Upon receipt of the Licensor Deliverables
   
25,000
 
 
     
Total
 
$
50,000
 
  
F-55

 
In addition, Infinium would have incurred royalty fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit royalty fees shall be applied against the aforementioned advance royalty payments. If the advance royalty payments have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium would have been required to pay directly to Codemasters the per unit royalty fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit royalty fee ranged from 25% to 50% of Infinium’s net receipts with a minimum per unit royalty fee ranging from $1.25 to $7.16 per title.

As the company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the advance payments, the company has expensed the advance royalty payments as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through December 31, 2006, $50,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

In the event that the per unit royalty fees were to exceed the advance royalty payments, those per unit royalty fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned. The Company is currently in default of this agreement.
 
  Atari, Inc.
 
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with Atari, Inc. (“Atari”) dated September 14, 2004 that will allow Infinium to market Atari’s catalog of video games software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expires on September 14, 2007 and authorizes Infinium to distribute Atari’s products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles will be available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.

The agreement with Atari requires Infinium to make the following non-refundable advance royalty payments as follows:
 
September 19, 2004
 
$
300,000
 
September 29, 2004
   
200,000
 
 
     
Total
 
$
500,000
 
 
In addition, Infinium incurs royalty fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit royalty fees shall be applied against the aforementioned advance royalty payments. Once the advance royalty payments have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium shall pay directly to Atari the per unit royalty fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit royalty fee ranges from $5.00 to $15.00 per title.

As the company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the advance payments, the company has expensed the advance royalty payments as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through December 31, 2006, $500,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

In the event that the per unit royalty fees exceed the advance royalty payments, those per unit royalty fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned. The Company is currently in default of this agreement.
 
Eidos Inc.
 
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with Eidos Inc. (“Eidos”) dated September 21, 2004 that would have allowed Infinium to market Eidos’s catalog of video games software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expired on December 31, 2005 and authorizes Infinium to distribute Eidos’s products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles would have been available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.
F-56

 
The agreement with Eidos required Infinium to make the following non-refundable advance royalty payments as follows:

September 25, 2004
 
$
62,500
 
Upon receipt of the Licensor Deliverables
   
62,500
 
 
     
Total
 
$
125,000
 
 
In addition, Infinium would have incurred royalty fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit royalty fees shall be applied against the aforementioned advance royalty payments. If the advance royalty payments would have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium would have been required to pay directly to Eidos the per unit royalty fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit royalty fee ranges from 25% to 50% of Infinium’s net receipts

As the company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the advance payments, the company has expensed the advance royalty payments as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through December 31, 2006, $125,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

In the event that the per unit royalty fees were to exceed the advance royalty payments, those per unit royalty fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned. The Company is currently in default of this agreement.

Enlight Inc.
 
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with Enlight Interactive Inc. (“Enlight”) dated September 21, 2004 that will allow Infinium to market Enlight’s catalog of video games software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expires on September 2, 2009 and authorizes Infinium to distribute Enlight’s products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles will be available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.

The agreement with Enlight requires Infinium to make the following non-refundable advance royalty payments as follows:
 
October 2, 2004
 
$
5,000
 
Upon receipt of the Licensor Deliverables
   
5,000
 
 
     
Total
 
$
10,000
 

In addition, Infinium incurs royalty fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit royalty fees shall be applied against the aforementioned advance royalty payments. Once the advance royalty payments have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium shall pay directly to Enlight the per unit royalty fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit royalty fee ranges from 30% to 50% of Infinium’s net receipts.

As the company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the advance payments, the company has expensed the advance royalty payments as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through December 31, 2006, $10,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.
 
F-57

 
In the event that the per unit royalty fees exceed the advance royalty payments, those per unit royalty fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned. The Company is currently in default of this agreement.
 
Vivendi International
 
Infinium signed a letter of intent with Vivendi Universal Games, Inc. (“Vivendi”) dated September 20, 2004 that will allow Infinium to market and distribute certain games on the Phantom Game Service to future end-users, if any, through a sale, license, subscription or on a time basis.  The agreement expires two years from delivery of the gold master for each Vivendi Game although Vivendi has the right to terminate the agreement as of September 5, 2005 as Infinium did not commercially release the Phantom Game Service.  For such right, Infinium was to pay Vivendi $125,000 within five (5) days after execution of the letter of intent, $125,000 after a definitive agreement was signed and $250,000 upon delivery of a master CD with Vivendi Games.  Infinium did not remit the initial $125,000 due to Vivendi and no definitive agreement was ever negotiated.   Infinium is currently in default under the letter of intent. 
 
As the company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the advance payments, the company has expensed the advance royalty payments as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through December 31, 2006, $175,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

The letter of intent with Vivendi requires Infinium to make the following non-refundable payments:  
 
September 25, 2004
 
$
125,000
 
Total
 
$
125,000
 

(B) Development Agreement

The company has a development agreement dated October 11, 2004 in place with BIOSTAR for the Phantom Game Receiver mainboard and graphics adapter. Terms are: $156,000 due at signing; $78,000 due before ship of pilot production units from Biostar; $78,000 due on acceptance of pilot units. The end design product will be wholly owned by the company. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through December 31, 2006, $337,139 of expenses have been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements. During September 2005, the Company settled the outstanding amounts plus related legal fees with Biostar by issuing 6,361,113 shares of common stock with a fair value of $311,695 on the date of settlement. The shares were issued under a court ordered settlement pursuant to 3(a)(10) under the Securities Act of 1933.

(C) Lease

Phantom Entertainment, Inc. leases office space in Luxembourg (starting May 1, 2006) under an operating lease that expired on December 31, 2006 but also requires a three month notice to terminate the lease. Minimum future rental payments under this lease are as follows:

Year Ending December 31,
 
 
 
2007
 
 
6,208
 
2008
 
 
-
 
2009
 
 
-
 
2010
 
 
-
 
Thereafter
 
 
-
 
Total
 
$
6,208
 


F-58

 
Rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2006, the year ended December 31, 2005, and the period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to December 31, 2006 was $460,600, $572,107and $1,410,157, respectively.
 
(D) Litigation

Beshara v. Infinium Labs Corporation, No. 2005 CA 005103 NC. In May 2005, Beshara sued us in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida, alleging default of a promissory note and seeking damages of approximately $1,400,000.00. On October 25, 2005, we settled accrued interest through October 31, 2005, together with reasonable attorneys’ fees, in the amount of $384,192 through issuance of 7,114,667 shares of our stock. On March 17, 2006, we entered into a conversion agreement with Beshara in order to reduce a portion of the outstanding principal and interest with 40,000,000 shares of common stock (as of May 22, 2006). In September 2006, the parties amended the promissory note to add for conversion of debt into equity. As of September 30, 2006, the remaining principal on the debt is approximately $986,449. So long as Beshara continues to convert debt into equity the foregoing action shall be abated.

Black Rocket Euro RSCG, LLC v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2005 CA 5008 NC. In May 2005, Black Rocket sued us in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida, alleging breach of contract and seeking damages in the amount of $95,272.00. Due to an administrative error, our attorney neglected to file a notice of appearance and on January 25, 2006, Black Rocket obtained a default judgment in the amount of $104,629. We have recorded $104,629 as well as $4,977 in accrued interest, as of September 30, 2006, in accounts payable.

CDW Corporation v. Infinium Labs Corporation, No. 05-M1-131484. In May 2005, CDW sued us in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, alleging that the Company placed orders for goods, failed to pay for such orders and thus breached the contract and seeking damages in the amount of $26,958. Due to financial constraints, we may not be able to replace local counsel. On February 7, 2006, the court entered judgment for $26,958 and we have recorded $27,932, including interest through September 30, 2006, in accounts payable.

GMR Marketing, LLC, v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 20050CA-10535NC. In January 2006, GMR sued us in the District Court of Florida, Sarasota County, alleging that it rendered advertising services and that the Company failed to pay for such services thereby breaching the contract. GMR sought damages in the amount of $107,544. Due to an error with our Florida counsel an answer to the complaint was not filed and on February 1, 2005 GMR received a default judgment in the amount of $107,883. Through September 30, 2006, the Company has recorded a total of $114,284, including interest, in accounts payable. On October 25, 2006, the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Company agreed to pay GMR $71,000 no later than December 20, 2006 in exchange for a full release of all previous claims.
 
Longview Special Finance, Inc. v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 06 CV 1772. In March 2006, Longview sued us in United States District in the Southern District of New York alleging breach of contract and requesting, in part, issuance of all remaining shares requested in prior conversion notices. The March complaint contained various errors. The parties entered into a negotiated settlement related to a portion of Longview’s claims on April 7, 2006. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company converted a portion of Longview’s requested conversion request and Longview agreed to dismiss the aforementioned matter in May 2006 and standstill on any further request for conversion or bring any additional claim on with respect to the Company’s failure to reserve adequate shares for Longview or deliver shares under a conversion. Although the Company has materially performed, Longview has not dismissed the action. In November 2006, Plaintiff submitted an amended complaint with similar claims and requested a hearing, currently scheduled for late November, on its request for an injunction.  The Company intends to respond vigorously to these claims and file counterclaims as well. On March 30, 2007, the Company and the Holders completed the settlement of the Action and entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of March 22, 2007 with the Holders pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 425,000,000 shares of free-trading common stock to the Holders in exchange for the Holders agreeing to enter into general releases and to petition the Court to dismiss the Action with prejudice. On March 30, 2007, the Court so ordered the adoption of the Agreement and general releases were executed and delivered by the parties. See Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007.
 
F-59


Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 06-2-05618-3 SEA. In February 2005, we entered into a Stipulation and Order for Entry of Judgment with Merrill Lynch pertaining to our default in rent of $127,312 due under our lease with Merrill Lynch (for our former corporate headquarters). The foregoing matter was adjudicated in the Superior Court for the State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In partial consideration of the entry of the judgment the lease, originally set to expire in August 2006, terminated on February 28, 2006 with no further monetary obligations. Subsequent to the entry of the order the parties entered into a settlement agreement that provided for a payment schedule of $5,000 per month with a final balloon payment due in July 2006. The Company intended on using proceeds from an SB-2 registration, but was unable to do so after the SB-2 was withdrawn on May 23, 2006. The Company was in default on the settlement agreement when it failed to make the balloon payment by July 31, 2006. In September 2006, Merrill Lynch assigned its rights to enforce the settlement agreement, and all other rights, to Fred Niedrich, a third party. On September 20, 2006, the parties entered into a new settlement agreement whereby the total debt due of $118,289 was settled for $100,000 pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Morley and Campbell v. Timothy Roberts and Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. D-1-GN-06-000851. In April 2006, Morley and Campbell sued Timothy Roberts individually and the Company in the District Court, 200 Judicial District, Travis County, Texas for breach of contract in failing to perform the remainder of an Asset Purchase Agreement and Assignment of Rights between plaintiffs and Roberts. The total claim is for $30,000. Phantom is defending itself vigorously in this suit and has retained local counsel in order to do so. No contingency has been accrued as of September 30, 2006. As of the date of this Annual Report, the plaintiff has not pursued any further remedies, and the Company believes that the action has been dropped.

M. Tyler Boles v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. V06-30. In January 2006, M. Tyler Boles sued us in the General District Court for Nelson County, Delaware, alleging a claim for money and seeking damages in the amount of $1,200. A judgment was entered in March 2006 for $1,254 and we have recorded $1,300, including interest through September 30, 2006, in accounts payable.

Oracle USA, Inc. v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. C05-5049. In December 2005, Oracle USA sued us in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, alleging that the Company placed orders for software, failed to pay for such orders and thus breached the contract and seeking damages in the amount of $198,818. In March 2006 judgment was entered against the Company in the aforementioned court for $199,068 and, as of September 30, 2006, this amount has been recorded in accounts payable.

Ronald Westman v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2006 CA 010711 NC. In November 2006, Ronald Westman filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. The Company has not been served with the summons and complaint and, therefore, can not provide any further detail. 

SBI USA, LLC v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 05CC10694. In November 2005, SBI USA, LLC, sued us in the Superior Court of California, Orange County, alleging breach of contract and seeking damages in the amount of $58,000. Judgment was entered against the Company in the aforementioned court in April 2006 for $55,000 and we have recorded $59,213, including interest through September 30, 2006, in accounts payable.
 
F-60

 
Walter Dorwin Teague Associates v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 05-9-35846-2. In December 2005, Teague Associates entered an arbitration award in the Superior Court for King County, Washington. The judgment is for $51,843 and we have recorded $55,734, including interest through September 30, 2006, in accounts payable. Teague & Associates was retained in 2004 to assist and support various industrial design requirements associated with hardware for the Phantom Game Service. The Company defaulted on its payment obligations and this resulted in the associated arbitration award.

In the Matter of Certain Fax Blasts, SF-2926. In approximately January 2005, we received subpoenas for documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in an investigation entitled In the Matter of Certain Fax Blasts. In compliance with other SEC issued subpoenas, several former employees, including our Chairman of the Board of Directors, have given testimony to the SEC’s staff while several current employees have participated in off-record interviews with the SEC staff. 

Timothy M. Roberts, the Company's Chairman of the Board of Directors, received a “Wells Notice” from the SEC in 2005. The Wells Notice was received by Mr. Roberts in a personal capacity. This Wells Notice was issued in connection with the SEC’s investigation relating to “phony fax scams” in which several penny stocks, including ours, were promoted to potential investors and resulted in charges filed by the SEC against two stock promoters. Under the SEC's procedures, the Wells Notice indicates that the staff of the SEC intends to recommend that the SEC bring a civil enforcement action against Mr. Roberts alleging violations of federal securities laws. Recipients of Wells Notices have the opportunity to respond to the SEC staff before any formal recommendation is made.
 
In May 2006, Mr. Roberts, in his personal capacity, was served with a complaint from the SEC in the matter entitled Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Timothy M. Roberts in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, pursuant to which the SEC alleges that Mr. Roberts made false statements with regard to the Company’s prospects while at the same time selling his shares of the Company’s common stock for personal gain through his alleged participation in a “phony fax scam”. The SEC seeks judgment against Mr. Roberts enjoining him from future violations of securities laws, requiring that he disgorge any gain or benefit he received from past violations, and imposing penalties for the violations. Further, the SEC seeks a judgment prohibiting Mr. Roberts from serving in the future as an officer or director of a public company and from participating in any offering of “penny stocks”. While the Board of Directors has currently agreed to indemnify Mr. Roberts’ legal expenses specifically related to this matter, no accrual has been made as of September 30, 2006. On May 9, 2007, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to (i) fully indemnify Mr. Roberts against the nature of the action arising out of the SEC Complaint and (ii) enter into a settlement agreement whereby the total debt due of $2,062.50 was to be settled for the same amount pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933. On the same date, the Company entered into the aforementioned settlement agreement.

John Fife v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2006 CA 012309 NC. In December 2006, John Fife filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the total debt due of $166,000.00 was settled for the same amount pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Phantom Investors LLC v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2005 CA 001211 NC. In February 2005, Phantom Investors LLC filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Federal Insurance Company v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2006 CA 005201 NC. In June 2006, Federal Insurance Company filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this action.

The Motley Fool Inc. v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. , No. 2006 CA 002132 NC. In March 2006, The Motley Fool Inc., filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Centerpointe Property LLC v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2006 CA 001216 NC. In February 2006, Centerpointe Property LLC filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Beshara Edward C v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2006 CA 000206 NC. In January 2006, Edward Beshara filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
F-61


Beshara James v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2005 CA 011388 NC. In November 2005, James Beshara filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Beshara Edward C and Beshara Sharon M v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2005 CA 010933 NC. In November 2005, Edward Beshara and Sharon Beshara filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. Subsequently, the Board of Directors agreed to authorize and directed the Company to enter, and the Company entered, into a settlement agreement whereby the amount agreed to by the parties was settled pursuant to 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933.

GMR Marketing, LLC, v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 20050CA-010535 NC. In October 2005, GMR filed an action in the Circuit Court of Florida, Sarasota County.

Tops Staffing Services v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc., No. 2005 CC 5829 NC. In 2005, Tops Staffing Services filed an action in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. On January 26, 2007, plaintiff obtained a Final Default Judgment against the Company.

John W. Anderson and Adam Goldblatt v. Phantom Entertainment, Inc. In 2007, John W. Anderson and Adam Goldblatt filed an action in the Superior Court for Seattle County, Washington. On January 30, 2007, plaintiff obtained a Default Judgment against the Company for unpaid compensation and related damages in the aggregate amount of 106,109.19.

From time to time, we may become party to litigation or other legal proceedings that we consider to be a part of the ordinary course of our business. We may become involved in material legal proceedings in the future. 

(E) Licenses

As detailed above in Note 8 (A), the Company has entered into agreements with a number of publishers to provide content for our Phantom Game Service . These agreements provide that we pay an advance to each publisher, which is recoupable by us against future royalties payable to these publishers under their respective agreements. As of December 31, 2006, the Company currently owes an aggregate of $845,000 to these publishers pursuant to these agreements and, if we fail to pay these advances, these agreements may be terminated.

(F) Payroll Taxes

The Company has accrued applicable employment taxes for individuals that were initially deemed and paid as independent contractors during the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 and the three months ended March 31, 2004 but, subsequently, reclassified as employees by the Company. In addition, the Company has recorded an estimate for interest and penalties that are due for the Company’s failure to timely file and pay taxes for these individuals as well as for the Company’s failure to timely file and/or pay payroll taxes for the third quarter of 2004 and the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2005. The amount recorded in accrued payroll and payroll taxes consists of the following:
 
 
 
As of
 
 
 
December 31,
2006
 
Payroll
 
$
238,627
 
Payroll taxes
   
1,365,162
 
Penalties and interest
   
874,417
 
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes
 
$
2,478,206
 

 
F-62

 
(G) Employment Agreements

On January 11, 2006, we entered into an Employment Agreement with Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, we will employ Mr. Koler commencing January 11, 2006 and his employment will be at-will. Mr. Koler will be paid an annual base salary of $250,000 (the “Base Salary”). In addition, on a quarterly basis, Mr. Koler will be eligible to earn a bonus of up to 35% of Base Salary based on meeting performance objectives and bonus criteria. In addition, Mr. Koler shall be entitled to receive the pro-rata amount of Base Salary due from November 18, 2005 through the January 10, 2006, as compensation for Mr. Koler’s role as our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer beginning on November 18, 2005.

Mr. Koler will be granted an aggregate of 5,000,000 restricted shares of our common stock, in accordance with the following vesting schedule: (i) 1,000,000 shares will be fully vested upon execution of the Employment Agreement, and the Stock Vesting Agreement dated as of January 11, 2006; and (ii) the remaining 4,000,000 shares of common stock shall vest quarterly over two years, 1/8 per quarter, to the extent Mr. Koler is employed with us at the pertinent vesting date and that our shareholders have authorized additional common stock. As of August 18, 2006, the related expense has been accrued under this agreement but no shares have been issued.

In addition, on January 11, 2006 we entered into a Confidential Information, Inventions, Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition Agreement with Mr. Koler. The non-competition and non-solicitation provisions shall remain in effect for two years following termination while the balance of this agreement survives any termination, subject to standard exceptions.
 
NOTE 9 STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

(A) Stock Options Issued Under Qualified Stock Option Plan

The Company's 2004 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan required shareholder consent which has not been obtained and will not be requested.  As such, any options granted under the Plan are not effective. 

(B) Warrants Issued and Outstanding
 
Stock Purchase Warrants

For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company granted warrants to purchase 16,357,800 shares of common stock in conjunction with two notes payable which were treated as a discount to the notes payable.
 
 
 
December 31,
2006
 
December 31,
2005
 
Warrants for common stock issued to a note holder. The term of the warrants are five years expiring November 10, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share
 
 
5,873,288
 
 
5,873,288
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to a note holder. The term of the warrants are five years expiring November 10, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
11,630,138
 
 
11,630,138
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued with subscription agreements. The term of the warrants are five years expiring November 10, 2009 and are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
678,900
 
 
678,900
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued with subscription agreements. The term of the warrants are five years expiring November 10, 2009 and are exercisable at $0.25 per share.
 
 
1,344,000
 
 
1,344,000
 
 
F-63

 
Warrants issued with subscription agreements. The term of the warrants are five years expiring November 10, 2009 and are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
3,084,181
 
 
3,084,181
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in conjunction with convertible notes. The term of the warrants are five years expiring December 31, 2009 and are exercisable at $0.50 per share.
 
 
232,000
 
 
232,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants issued in conjunction with convertible notes. The term of the warrants are five years expiring December 31, 2009 and are exercisable at $0.50 per share.
 
 
200,000
 
 
200,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring October 22, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share.    
 
 
500,000
 
 
500,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring October 27, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share.
 
 
500,000
 
 
500,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring December 31, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
5,437,487
 
 
5,437,487
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring December 31, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.75 per share.    
 
 
5,437,487
 
 
5,437,487
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5,437,487
 
 
5,437,487
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to note holder. The term of the warrants is three years expiring February 4, 2008. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
200,000
 
 
200,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to note holder. The term of the warrants is three years expiring February 4, 2008. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
200,000
 
 
200,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to note holder. The term of the warrants is three years expiring February 4, 2008. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
100,000
 
 
100,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock granted to note holder. The terms of the warrants are three years expiring April 29, 2008. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
400,000
 
 
400,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring December 31, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.    
 
 
4,687,485
 
 
4,687,485
 
 
F-64

 
Warrants for common stock issued to an investor. The term of the warrants are five years expiring June 10, 2010. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
6,226,359
 
 
6,226,359
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to an investor. The term of the warrants is three years expiring September 19, 2008. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
 
8,160,000
 
 
8,160,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued to a note holder. The term of the warrants are three years expiring January 25, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $1.09 per share.
 
 
5,000,000
 
 
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued parties identified by noteholder as additional consideration for a note. The term of the warrants is five years expiring June 30, 2011. The warrants are exercisable at $0.015 per share.
 
 
1,357,800
 
 
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Warrants for common stock issued parties identified by noteholder as additional consideration for a note. The term of the warrants is five years expiring August 18, 2011. The warrants are exercisable at $0.015 per share.
 
 
10,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
 
76,686,612
 
 
60,328,812
 
 
NOTE 10   GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company is in the development stage with no sales and has recurring losses from inception of $73,550,242, has a working capital deficiency of $18,344,236, a stockholders’ deficiency of $18,627,236, has a negative cash flow from operations of $15,654,926 from inception and notes payable in default of $2,242,276. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
 
Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding, settle notes payable currently in default and implement its business plan provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 11   RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On January 5, 2004, our wholly owned subsidiary merged with and into Infinium Labs Operating Corporation, with Infinium Labs Operating Corporation surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary. In connection with such merger, Timothy M. Roberts, our former Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors, received 36,199,220 shares of our common stock as merger consideration based on the shares he owned in Infinium Labs Operating Corporation immediately prior to the merger. Also in connection with the merger, Mr. Roberts' mother, sister and brother received, respectively, 3,141,660, 31,400 and 31,400 shares of our common stock as merger consideration.

On June 21, 2004, the Company compensated Timothy M. Roberts, our former Chief Executive Officer $50,000 as consideration for his personal guaranty at that time of a commercial promissory note payable secured by a real estate mortgage encumbering the his residence. The note is for $1,500,000 with interest calculated at fifteen percent (15%) per annum up to the maximum amount allowed by law in the event of default. The note also permits a late charge in the amount of five percent (5%).

F-65

 
On July 28, 2004, the Company issued Richard Angelotti, a director, 800,000 shares of common stock as consideration for his personal guaranty of a promissory note payable secured by a real estate mortgage encumbering the director's residence. The note, effective on July 28, 2004 and expiring on July 27, 2005, was payable to Stephen A. Witzer, Trustee U/A dated February 7, 1985. The principal is for $500,000 with interest calculated at fifteen percent (15%) per annum, plus a five percent (5%) penalty, if applicable, for any late payment. In the event of an uncured default, the interest increases to eighteen percent (18%) per annum. On December 9, 2005, this promissory note was assigned by Witzer to Richard Angelotti. The terms of the promissory note were subsequently amended to provide that as of November 1, 2005, principal and accrued interest totaled $560,437. With respect to the revised principal, commencing November 2, 2005, simple interest at a rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum will accrue on a monthly basis until December 31, 2006 (maturity date), at which time the entire remaining principal and all accrued and unpaid interest are due in full.

On November 2, 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $43,735 ($0.2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer.

On November 2, 2004, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $65,603 ($0.2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Timothy Roberts, as CEO (Mr. Roberts was also the CFO and Chairman).

On December 8, 2004, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $65,603 ($0. 2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer.

On December 8, 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $43,735 ($0. 2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Timothy Roberts, as CEO (Mr. Roberts was also the CFO and Chairman).

On December 8, 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock with a fair market value of $21,866 ($0. 2187 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Richard Angelotti, Director.
 
On January 27, 2005, the Company borrowed $300,000 from Timothy Roberts, our former CEO and the Chairman and a Director of our company, under a 15% promissory note, which was payable no later than April 27, 2005. The note was subsequently transferred by Mr. Roberts to parties unaffiliated with us. On or about May 10 through 12, 2005, this note was assigned by Mr. Roberts to the following individuals with corresponding amounts: (1) Gerard Dariano, $100,000; (2) Fred Niedrich, $50,000; (3) Gary Fears, $50,000; and (4) John Landino, $100,000.On June 13, 2005, the full principal and interest was settled at $0.10 per share in consideration for our issuance of 3,187,206 shares of common stock to the holders, valued at $318,721. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $95,616.
 
On March 11, 2005, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $272,000 ($.34 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Richard Angelotti, Director.

On May 10, 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $37,500 ($0.15 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer.

On June 3, 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $25,000 ($0.10 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer.

F-66

 
On June 13, 2005, the Company issued 1,700,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $221,000 ($0.13 per share) to Timothy Roberts. These shares were an indemnification to Mr. Roberts as the guarantor on a $400,000, 6% promissory note between the Company and Nite Capital. The note was collateralized with Mr. Roberts’ personal holdings of Company stock.

On June 22, 2005, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $50,000 ($0.10 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Timothy Roberts, as our CEO (Mr. Roberts was also the CFO and Chairman).

On August 11, 2005, the Company issued 882,398 shares of common stock with a fair value of $61,768 ($0.07 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Timothy Roberts, as our CEO (Mr. Roberts was also the CFO and Chairman).

On August 11, 2005, the Company issued 712,960 shares of common stock with a fair value of $49,907 ($0.07 per share) in lieu of cash compensation to Kevin Bachus as our President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Bachus became CEO, CFO and a Director on August 15, 2005.

On August 11, 2005, the Company issued 296,297 shares of common stock with a fair value of $20,741 ($0.07 per share) to Richard Angelotti, Director.

On August 18, 2005, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock to Richard Angelotti, with a fair value of $350,000 ($0.07 per share).

On August 18, 2005, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Timothy M. Roberts, our former Chief Executive Officer, with a fair value of $700,000 ($0.07 per share).

On December 9, 2005, this the July 28, 2004 promissory note for $500,000 was assigned by Mr. Witzer to a Dick Angelotti, a Director.  The terms of the promissory note were subsequently amended to provide that as of November 1, 2005, principal and accrued interest totaled $560,437.43.  With respect to the revised principal, commencing November 2, 2005, simple interest at a rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum will accrue on a monthly basis until December 31, 2006 (maturity date), at which time the entire remaining principal and all accrued and unpaid interest are due in full. 

On January 1, 2006, the Company converted $91,775 owed under employee expense reimbursements into a promissory note to Timothy Roberts, a former employee, and the current Chairman and a Director. The note is unsecured and bears an 8% rate of interest. During November 2006, the Company issued 19,940,582 shares of common stock in full settlement of the promissory note and accrued interest. The fair value was $97,709 ($0.0049 per share) and no gain or loss was recognized.

On January 11, 2006, Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer, was granted 1,000,000 shares of common stock under the terms of his employment agreement. As of June 30, 2006, such shares have not been issued.

On February 14, 2006, the company issued Greg Koler, our Chief Executive Officer, 1,021,239 of common stock with a fair market value of $18,382 ($.018 per share) for services performed by Mr. Koler, prior to November 18, 2005, in his capacity as an independent contractor prior to becoming the CEO.

On July 26, 2006, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $325,814.02 ($.01629 per share) to Timothy Roberts, Chairman, for consulting services rendered in 2006 and to be rendered for the balance of 2006.

On August 4, 2006, the Company issued 41,659,182 shares of common stock with a fair value of $624,887.73 ($.015 per share) to convert a promissory note held by Richard Angelotti, a Director, and accrued interest. No gain or loss was recognized on the conversion.

F-67

 
During November 2006, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock to Greg Koler, the CEO, with a fair value of $66,000 ($0.0033 per share).

During November 2006, the Company issued 9,000,000 shares of common stock to Greg Koler, the CEO, with a fair value of $34,200 ($0.0038 per share).
 
During November 2006, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Greg Koler, the CEO, with a fair value of $3,600 ($0.0036 per share).

During November 2006, the Company issued 19,940,582 shares of common stock in full settlement of a promissory note held by Timothy Roberts, Chairman, and accrued interest. The fair value was $97,709 ($0.0049 per share) and no gain or loss was recognized.
NOTE 12   SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

(A) Common Stock Issuances
 
During March 2007, the Company issued 425,000,000 shares of common stock in full settlement of notes and accrued interest. Principal and interest in the amount of $3,103,895 was converted ($0.0073 per share).
 
During March 2007, the Company issued 179,800,000 shares of common stock in full settlement of notes and accrued interest. Principal and interest in the amount of $152,400 was converted ($0.00085 per share).
 
During March 2007, the Company issued 9,990,909 shares of common stock in partial conversion of a note. Principal in the amount of $91 was converted ($0.0000091 per share).
 
During March 2007, the Company issued 9,091 shares of common stock for warrants exercised. Warrants in the amount of $9,909 were exercised ($1.09 per share).
 
During March 2007, the Company issued 116,057,264 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $145,072 ($0.00125 per share).
 
During March 2007, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $5,625 ($0.001125 per share).
 
During April 2007, the Company issued 11,000,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $12,375 ($0.001125 per share).
 
(B) Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

On March 16, 2007, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to provide for an increase in its authorized share capital. The authorized capital stock increased from 1,200,000,000 to 2,400,000,000 common shares at a par value of $0.0001 per share.
F-68