10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

[X]	Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
or
[  ]	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission File Number 1-31300
EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	76-0517977 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
700 North Sam Houston Parkway West, Suite 200 Houston, Texas (Address of principal executive offices)	77067 (Zip Code)
832-353-1000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class:	Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $.01 par value	New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights	New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

            Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [  ] Yes  [X] No

            Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. [  ] Yes  [X] No

            Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or by such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.[X] Yes      [  ] No

            Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 or Regulation S-K (§ 229,405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

            Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.   [  ] Large accelerated filer [  ] Accelerated filer [  ] Non-accelerated filer   [X] Smaller reporting company

            Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).   [   ] Yes     [X] No

            The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $25.9 million as of June 30, 2008. 

            As of February 27, 2009, 17,592,627 shares of common stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

            Information called for by Part III of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2008.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	Forward-Looking Statements	1
	PART I
Item 1.	Business	1
	General	2
	Our Business Segments	2
	Our Products and Services	3
	Aircraft Fleet	5
	Competitors	6
	Industry	7
	Industry Regulation	8
	Employees	9
	Securities Exchange Act Reports	9
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	10
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	16
Item 2.	Properties	16
	Flight Equipment	16
	Facilities	17
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	18
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	18
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	18
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	20
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
	Overview	23
	Our Business	24
	Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	36
	Operations Review	43
	Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position	50
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	59
	Aircraft Fuel	59
	Interest Rates	59
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	60
	Report of Management	61
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	62
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting	63
	Consolidated Statements of Operations	64
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	65
	Assets	65
	Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	66
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	67
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	68
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	69
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	109
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	109
Item 9B.	Other Information	109
	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	110
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	110
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	110
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	110
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	110
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules	110
	Signatures	116
	Report of Independent Public Accounting Firm	117
	Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	118

Forward-Looking Statements

            This report contains forward-looking statements.  Statements in the "Business,” “Risk Factors,” "Properties" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation" sections of this report, together with other statements including words such as "believes," "intends," "plans," "anticipates, “estimates," "projects," "expects" or similar expressions represent forward-looking statements that are based on our expectations in light of facts known by management on the date this report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  Specifically, statements regarding our future results of operations, operating costs, business prospects, growth and capital expenditures, including plans with respect to our fleet, are forward-looking statements.  These statements reflect our plans and assumptions about future events and are subject to uncertainties, many of which are outside our control.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements include known and unknown risks.  The five key areas of the known risks that could significantly impact our revenues, operating results and capacity include:

•  our operations for Continental Airlines (“Continental”) as Continental Express pursuant to a capacity purchase agreement (the “Continental CPA”) may no longer be profitable;

•  our charter operation and other aviation services may affect our ability to operate profitably;

•  our covenants under the amended indentures of our convertible notes and the profile of our current shareholders;

•  rising costs, the global economic recession and the highly competitive nature of the airline industry; and

•  regulations, including listing regulations for publicly-traded companies, and other factors.

            For further discussions of these risks and others, please see "Item 1A - Risk Factors."  The statements in this report are made as of March 2, 2009, and the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a materially different extent than described in this report.  We undertake no duty to update or revise any of forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) is engaged in the business of transporting people.  Our principal asset is all of the issued and outstanding shares of stock of XJT Holdings, Inc., the sole stockholder of ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. (referred to in this report as “Airlines” and, together with Holdings, as “ExpressJet”, “Company”, “we” or “us”).  Airlines currently operates a fleet of 244 aircraft.  As of December 31, 2008, our fleet was assigned as follows:

•  214 aircraft operating for Continental as Continental Express pursuant to the Continental CPA; and

•  30 aircraft operating in our Corporate Aviation division, which is dedicated to charter contracts and ad-hoc charter service.

Our primary business is flying 244 aircraft under contractual arrangements for network carriers and entities desiring cost-effective and fully customizable group travel.  During 2008, we dramatically reshaped our business to adapt to unprecedentedly high fuel costs, recessions in the global economy, reductions in air-travel capacity, and other uncertainties facing the regional airlines.  We completed most of our transition to the contractually-arranged flying during the fourth quarter ending December 31, 2008.  Additionally, we strengthened our balance sheet through the completion of the refinancing of our convertible debt, reducing the debt from $134.7 million as of December 31, 2007 to $60.8 million as of December 31, 2008.  We stabilized the use of operating cash as a result of the suspension of our Branded Flying (defined below) operations.   Furthermore, we mutually agreed with Delta Air Lines (“Delta”) to suspend our capacity purchase agreement (the “Delta CPA”) and pro-rate flying arrangement  (the “Delta Prorate”) effective September 2, 2008.  With the suspension of these flying operations, we anticipate generating cash from our contractual arrangements with Continental and our Corporate Aviation division.

            We also provide aviation services, such as ground-handling at airport locations across the United States, as well as aircraft repair, overhaul, interior refurbishments and paint, through our three wholly owned subsidiaries, which include ExpressJet Services, LLC (“ExpressJet Services”), American Composites, LLC (“American Composites”) and InTech Aerospace Services, LP (“InTech”) and our and majority owned subsidiary, Saltillo Jet Center (“Saltillo”).  During the first half of 2007, we rebranded American Composites, InTech and Saltillo so that each now goes under the “ExpressJet Services” trade name.  These entities are collectively referred to herein as “Services.”

            Holdings was incorporated in Delaware in August 1996.  Airlines is one of the largest regional airlines in the world, based on 2008 available seat miles, number of regional jets and passengers transported.

            We compete with a number of regional airlines for the service we provide to other airlines.  We believe that our continuing success depends on our ability to provide our charter customers and Continental outstanding operational performance and exceptional customer service while effectively managing costs.  Our ability to do this depends on over 5,400 employees executing efficiently on a daily basis.  Being successful will allow us to improve our competitive position and provide value to our stockholders.

Our Business Segments

            Business Segments as of December 2008

            For the year ended December 31, 2008 and prior, ExpressJet had three reportable segments which are the basis of our internal financial reporting: Contract Flying, Branded Flying and Aviation Services.

            Contract Flying includes our Corporate Aviation (charter) division and our capacity purchase agreements with Continental and Delta.  Under Contract Flying, revenues are contractually determined, eliminating our exposure to fluctuations in fuel prices, fare competition and passenger volumes.  Under these arrangements, our partners bear the revenue risk and cost of marketing and distribution on our aircraft while we are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the aircraft.

            Branded Flying includes operations under the ExpressJet brand and the Delta Prorate.  Revenues for this flying were derived from passengers flying on scheduled air service.  We were responsible for local market pricing, scheduling and revenue management, and the operation and maintenance of the aircraft.  Our flying under the Delta Prorate provided us with a prorated portion of the airfare plus an incentive for passengers connecting onto Delta's network.  In September 2008 we suspended Branded Flying in response to high fuel costs and falling demand.

            Aviation Services includes our ground-handling services pursuant to contracts with Continental and other airlines at airport locations across the United States, as well as those performed by Services.  These entities provide composite, sheet metal, paint, interior (including seat refurbishment) and thrust reverser repairs throughout our five facilities in the United States and Mexico. 

Our Products and Services

            Prior to 2007, virtually all of our revenue came from the Continental CPA and our entire fleet of 274 aircraft was flown in support of Continental’s network.  In recent years, our products and services were focused on delivering cost-effective and reliable travel experience across the various business platforms for all of our customers.  The result was an infrastructure that afforded us the ability to:

•  continue our capacity purchase flying with Continental;

•  develop our own brand through scheduled flying as ExpressJet Airlines;

•  commence capacity purchase and prorate flying for Delta;

•  establish a niche in the corporate and ad-hoc charter service market; and

•  broaden the scope of our maintenance and ground handling capabilities.

            During the last half of 2008, due to external factors beyond our controls, this same infrastructure afforded us the ability to reshape our products and services.  We suspended our Branded Flying operations, focused on Contract Flying and reduced the number of aircraft in our fleet from 274 at the beginning of 2008 to 244 by the end of 2008. 

            Our transition continues in 2009 as we seek additional opportunities to provide unique group travel experiences and to further leverage our capabilities with the increasing number of aircraft dedicated to contractual flying outside of the Continental CPA.  This is a dynamic process and will remain so for the foreseeable future as we seek to optimize revenue generation from our assets.

            Contract Flying

            As of December 31, 2008, we averaged over 950 daily Contract Flying flights, offering passenger service to over 130 scheduled destinations in North America, including Mexico as well as the Caribbean.  We generated $1.1 billion of revenue (80.3% of our total consolidated revenue) in this segment.

            Continental Capacity Purchase and Other Agreements

A significant portion of our revenue and cash flows is attributable to the Continental CPA.  Under the Continental CPA, Airlines operates flights on behalf of Continental as Continental Express.  Continental controls and is responsible for scheduling, pricing and managing seat inventories and is entitled to all revenue associated with the operation of the aircraft.  We also have various other agreements with Continental that govern our relationship.  For a detailed discussion of the Continental CPA, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - - Contract Flying – Continental CPA of this report.”

Delta CPA

            During 2008, we averaged over 35 daily departures and offered scheduled passenger service to over 20 destinations in North America under the Delta CPA.  We generated $43.8 million of revenue during 2008 from this arrangement.

            The Delta CPA was scheduled to end on the second anniversary of each aircraft’s in-service date (June 2009); however, Delta and ExpressJet mutually agreed in July 2008 to suspend this agreement effective September 2, 2008.  Delta agreed to compensate us in August 2008 for costs incurred as a result of the early termination.  On October 2, 2008, we transitioned the 10 aircraft previously operating within the Delta CPA back to our current fleet.

            Corporate Aviation

We expanded our Corporate Aviation division to 30 aircraft.  These aircraft are now dedicated to existing and new long-term agreements and ad-hoc charter service arrangements.  Our Corporate Aviation division continues to focus on corporate shuttles, entertainment / sports, and government businesses.  As of December 31, 2008, our Corporate Aviation division has contracted with seven customers with long-term agreements spanning the next 12 months.  Certain Corporate Aviation customers typically prepay deposits for flights based on a percentage of estimated charges to be incurred.  These prepayments are held in escrow and recorded as restricted cash and deferred revenue until the flights are completed.  At that time we recognize the associated revenue and release the funds from escrow into our cash account.

            Corporate Aviation’s goal is to provide group travelers a comfortable, cost-effective and fully customizable travel experience that is unmatched by our competitors.  Additionally, our objective is to make jet charter the ultimate and most satisfying solution to getting people where they need to be.  We are providing such travel solutions to corporations, including other air carriers from time to time, collegiate athletic departments, sports franchises, government entities, hospitality companies and others.  Our pricing structure is based on a contracted fee plus reconciliation payments for uncontrollable costs (including items such as fuel and deicing) for the full amount from which actual costs differ from estimates.

            The aircraft are flown under Airlines’ operating certificate issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (the “FAA”). 

            We understand that every group travel situation is different.  Therefore, we have reconfigured our aircraft and are currently offering two different seat-configurations on our Corporate Aviation division fleet. 

•  Our 41-seat passenger jet provides additional space for the customer.  The seats in this configuration provide a 38-inch pitch, which is equivalent to a first class seat in a Boeing 737-800.

•  Our 50-seat passenger jet allows for larger groups, which helps maximize travel efficiency.

            All of our seats are leather, memory foam cushioned seats and include XM Satellite Radio with over 100 channels of audio entertainment.  In addition to our basic amenities (such as providing blankets to each passenger and standard catering) customized flight service options give customers an opportunity to create a unique flight experience. 

            We generated $39.8 million in revenue as of December 31, 2008, and anticipate that revenues will continue to grow in this division as we continue to establish long-term relationships which should result in greater predictability in this operation.

Branded Flying

            As of August 31, 2008, we averaged just under 250 daily departures by offering scheduled passenger service to over 30 destinations in North America with our ExpressJet brand and Delta Prorate operations.  Within this segment, we generated $222.0 million of revenue from January through December 2008.

            During the last half of 2008, we dramatically reshaped our business in order to adapt to the then unprecedented high fuel costs and other challenges facing the industry.  As part of the transition, we suspended our ExpressJet Flying operations.   Furthermore, we mutually agreed with Delta to terminate the Delta Prorate effective September 2, 2008.   We completed most of our transition to Contract Flying during the fourth quarter of 2008. 

            Fuel

            We were fully exposed to the availability of fuel and fuel price increases during 2008 in operating aircraft in Branded Flying.  Our fuel management strategy was to enter into fixed forward price contracts with our fuel provider using a systematic method for determining the volume and the price for which to enter into the contracts for a rolling 12-month period on a quarterly basis.   For the year ended December 31, 2008, approximately 52.7% of our fuel expense was associated with our Branded Flying.

            With our transformation during the last quarter of 2008 from Branded Flying, including the terminations of our Delta CPA and prorate flying, we have also terminated our fuel fixed forward price contracts.  With the decision to suspend our Branded Flying operations, we sold our fixed forward purchase contracts for periods subsequent to September 2, 2008, which resulted in a non-operating gain of approximately $23 million. 

            Under the Continental CPA and various charter agreements, we are protected from the volatility of fuel prices; however, if the unavailability of fuel caused us to cancel flights, our revenues would be reduced.  We continue to work diligently with Continental and our fuel provider to ensure that fuel is available and ready for all our flights as part of our reliability and on-time performance program.

Aviation Services

            Revenues generated by Aviation Services totaled $43.8 million in 2008.  This segment includes our ground-handling services pursuant to contracts with Continental and other airlines at airport locations across the United States, as well as those performed by Services.  Ground-handling services include departure management, baggage handling and ticket counter services for several airlines including Continental, American Airlines, Inc. (“American Airlines”) and Allegiant Air at locations across the United States.

            Our Aviation Services segment also includes Services.  These entities are the North American partner to three major European original equipment manufacturers and provide composite, sheet metal, paint, interior (including seat refurbishment) and thrust reverser repairs throughout our five facilities in the United States and Mexico. 

            As a result of the reshaping of our business, we determined that certain entities under the Services, including the real estate holdings, are non-core assets to Holdings.  Therefore, we have been pursuing the monetization of some of these non-core assets and some or a portion of such assets may be sold in 2009. 

Aircraft Fleet

            Our Fleet

            We operate a fleet of 244 aircraft which includes Embraer ERJ-145 and ERJ-145XR aircraft.  The Continental CPA provides for the continued lease or sublease of our 244 Embraer regional jets.  As of December 31, 2008, 214 aircraft were operating under our Continental CPA and the remaining 30 aircraft were operating within our Corporate Aviation division.

            The operational capability of the ERJ-145 is 1,100 miles.  The ERJ-145XR, with a 1,600 mile range, continues to create potential expansion opportunities for us whether under our network or other carriers’ networks to more economically serve cities that are the right size for our aircraft.  We are currently the only operator of the ERJ-145XR in the world.  Each aircraft is equipped with advanced technology and certifications that aid our operation in challenging weather conditions and flying efficiently at higher flight altitudes. 

            The aircraft dedicated to Continental offer a seamless jet service experience to Continental’s passengers.  The planes feature overhead baggage compartments, under-seat baggage storage, leather seating, lavatories, in-flight meal and beverage service capabilities and jet-bridge loading in most locations. 

            Aircraft dedicated to corporate charters have redesigned seats for enhanced comfort and feature complimentary XM Satellite Radio with over 100 channels of entertainment. 

            We have options for 50 ERJ-145XR aircraft that may be exercised for other types of aircraft within the ERJ-145 Family.  Our next option exercise date is April 1, 2009.  If we do not exercise or extend our option as of this date, 25 options will expire.  In 2005, Continental declined the right to include any of our option aircraft in the Continental CPA; consequently, Continental is not required to participate in the financing for any option aircraft that we acquire.  We currently have no firm orders for additional aircraft.

            Maintenance of Our Aircraft

            We maintain our aircraft primarily using our own trained and FAA-certified personnel and facilities.  We perform routine maintenance in addition to the inspection of our aircraft engines and airframes at intervals required by the FAA.  We perform line and heavy maintenance at our facilities in Cleveland, Ohio; Houston, Texas; Knoxville, Tennessee; Ontario, California; Newark, New Jersey; Richmond, Virginia; and Shreveport, Louisiana.  We also perform line maintenance at our satellite maintenance stations.  We maintain an inventory of aircraft spare parts to ensure the reliability of our operations and utilize a computerized tracking system to increase maintenance efficiency and avoid excess inventory of spare parts.

            We have a power-by-the-hour agreement with Rolls Royce to maintain the engines on our aircraft through April 2015.  Under the agreement, we are charged a fixed rate based on flight hours incurred during a month.  The rates are subject to annual revisions based on specific labor and materials indices.  We also have power-by-the-hour agreements with other key vendors to cover various high value components and systems on the aircraft, such as auxiliary power units, avionics, environmental controls, tires, wheels and brakes.  For 2008, 71% of our maintenance, materials and repairs cost consisted of power-by-the-hour expenses.  We believe that these agreements, coupled with our ongoing maintenance program, reduce the likelihood of unexpected maintenance expense during the aircraft lease terms and greatly mitigate accelerating maintenance costs commonly associated with aging aircraft.

Competitors

            The airline industry is highly competitive.  ExpressJet competes principally with other regional airlines providing long-term service to legacy carriers, aircraft operators providing customized on-demand charter services, and companies who offer aircraft ground handling services.

            We are one of several competitors in the commercial airline market.  Our competitors include Chautauqua Airlines (“Chautauqua”), Mesa Airlines (“Mesa”), Mesaba Airlines, Pinnacle Airlines (“Pinnacle”), Republic Airways (“Republic”) and SkyWest Airlines (including Atlantic Southeast Airlines) (“SkyWest”).  We also compete with other airlines, such as American Eagle, Comair, Compass and Horizon Airlines, which are wholly owned subsidiaries of major airline holding companies.  One of the principal challenges for airlines operating regional jets under either fixed-fee or revenue-sharing arrangements, in addition to depending on the financial health of their partners, is the ability to maintain reliable and seamless operations with a competitive cost structure.

            Due to variations among the contracts under which regional airlines operate, cost comparisons between regional airlines are difficult.  However, we believe ExpressJet is the best operator in the industry with one of the most competitive capacity purchase agreements.  After entering into the Amended Continental CPA, we significantly cut our operating cost structure – removing $100 million (annualized) in expenses during 2008 – and continue to focus on the efficiencies of operating a single fleet type as well as utilizing technology to streamline and improve our operation.  Finally, our position as the launch customer for the ERJ-145 family and our Amended Continental CPA provides us some of the most favorable fleet financing in the industry.

            Our Corporate Aviation division competes in varying degrees with corporate aviation departments, non-scheduled aircraft operators and scheduled air carriers offering non-scheduled service.  We are the largest on-demand 41 and 50-seat aircraft operator and compete primarily with operators offering fewer seats.  We operate under a part 121 certificate (complete commercial airline operator certificate from the FAA), which requires higher standards than operators flying under a part 135 certificate (private airline operator certificate from the FAA).  Some regional airlines, such as SkyWest and Chautauqua, offer similar products directly to customers or through subcontract agreements with legacy carriers such as Continental or Delta. 

            During 2008, several charter companies ceased flying due to increasing costs, operating less efficient equipment, and increased competition.  These events created opportunities for us to leverage our experience and infrastructure.  Growing awareness of our brand as a high quality product is enabling us to achieve continued market penetration.

            Our Aviation Services division competes with both airlines and non-airlines for long-term ground handling contracts.  Some of these entities include SkyWest, Air Wisconsin, American Eagle, Pinnacle, Delta Global Services, PrimeFlight, Servisair, Aircraft Service International, and Worldwide Flight Services.

Industry

            The United States airline industry has been very competitive since it was deregulated in 1978, and various business models have been developed to offer commercial air service.  The industry has traditionally been led by airlines, such as American Airlines, United Air Lines (“United”), Delta and Continental, which schedule flight service to most major U.S. cities, numerous smaller U.S. cities, and cities throughout the world via a hub-and-spoke model.  Other airlines, such as Southwest Airlines and JetBlue, offer scheduled flights to many of the same domestic markets, but at lower prices and with fewer amenities to travelers; they have competed effectively in the U.S. market previously due to their lower cost structures.  Another group, including ExpressJet, Mesa, Republic and SkyWest, has evolved to provide feeder service to the hub-and-spoke network or point-to-point service for smaller and medium-sized airports through fixed-fee or revenue-sharing agreements.  The development of the regional jets operated by this group has given legacy carriers the ability to connect markets in the United States, Mexico and Canada more economically than with larger aircraft.

            Commercial airline strategies typically include:

•  minimizing operating costs;

•  broadening their networks to spread fixed costs over more flights;

•  emphasizing international expansion to seize opportunities in the more regulated capacity controlled international market;

•  focusing on business travelers, who historically have paid higher fares;

•  formalizing code-sharing alliances (i.e., OneWorld, SkyTeam, etc.) in order to maximize marketing and network scheduling;

•  maintaining capacity and market share;

•  bringing additional connecting traffic into their networks through new alliances;

•  adjusting fares to offset higher costs (such as fuel);

•  unbundling product features to increase revenue; and

•  differentiating product features from competitors.

            Commercial airlines have faced unprecedented challenges over the last few years including volatile fuel prices and an economy in recession.  Higher fuel costs have resulted in upward pricing pressures, lower demand and capacity reductions.  As fuel prices recede and the economy weakens, the economics of regional aircraft become more favorable for some legacy carriers.  Lower demand necessitates equipment substitutions from higher capacity aircraft to regional jets. 

Industry Regulation

            We operate under a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Department of Transportation (“DOT”).  This certificate may be altered, amended, modified or suspended by the DOT if public convenience and necessity so require.  The DOT has jurisdiction to prohibit certain unfair or anti-competitive practices, determine carrier fitness to serve and mandate certain conditions of carriage.  The DOT can bring proceedings for the enforcement of its regulations under applicable federal statutes, which proceedings may result in civil penalties, revocation of certificate authority or criminal sanctions.

            We also operate under an air carrier operating certificate issued by the FAA which may be amended, modified, suspended or revoked if safety in air commerce or air transportation and the public interest so require.  The FAA regulates airlines, primarily in the areas of flight operations, maintenance, ground facilities, hazardous materials and goods handling and other technical matters.  Under these regulations, we have established, and the FAA has approved, proper cargo training and handling programs and maintenance program for the aircraft that ExpressJet operates, which provides for the ongoing maintenance of these aircraft, ranging from frequent routine inspections to major overhauls.  The FAA enforces its regulations by the imposition of civil penalties or revocation of certificate, which can result in adverse financial impact to our operations.

            Based on conditions in the industry, or as a result of Congressional directives or statutes, the DOT and the FAA from time to time propose and adopt new regulations or amend existing regulations, such as the air service delivery regulation currently being discussed between U.S. Congress and the DOT, which may impose additional regulatory burdens and costs on us.  Imposition of new laws and regulations on air carriers could increase our cost of operation or limit our operating discretion.

            The Aviation and Transportation Security Act of 2001 (the “ATSA”) federalized substantially all aspects of civil aviation security and created the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) under the Department of Homeland Security.  The implementation of the requirements of the ATSA and other security laws and regulations resulted in increased costs for airlines and passengers, as well as delays and disruptions in air travel.  The TSA issued regulations implementing the ATSA, including a requirement that we adopt an air carrier security program.  Failure to comply with TSA rules or with our security program may result in the imposition of substantial civil penalties.  The law also requires that checked baggage be screened by explosives detection systems, which has required significant equipment acquisition by the government and the implementation of facility and baggage process changes.  Further implementation of the requirements of the ATSA and other security laws and regulations have resulted in increased costs for airlines and passengers, delays and disruptions to air travel and reduced demand.

            In the maintenance of our aircraft and ground equipment, we handle and use many materials that are classified as hazardous.  The Environmental Protection Agency and similar local agencies have jurisdiction over the handling and processing of these materials.  We are also subject to the oversight of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration concerning employee safety and health matters.  We are subject to the Federal Communications Commission’s jurisdiction regarding the use of radio frequencies. Federal law establishes maximum aircraft noise and emissions limits.  All of our aircraft comply with currently applicable federal noise and emissions regulations.  Federal law generally preempts airports from imposing unreasonable local noise rules that restrict air carrier operations.  However, under certain circumstances, airport operators may implement reasonable and nondiscriminatory local noise abatement procedures, which could impact our ability to serve certain airports, particularly in off-peak hours.

Employees

            Our past and continuing success depends on the ability of our employees to execute effectively on a daily basis. As of December 31, 2008, we had over 5,400 employees, comprised of 2,125 pilots and instructor pilots, 1,022 flight attendants, 519 customer service personnel, 920 mechanics, 68 dispatchers and 749 supervisors, management and support personnel.

            Labor costs are a significant component of airline expenses and can substantially impact our results.  While there can be no assurance that our generally good labor relations and high labor productivity will continue, a crucial component of our business strategy is the preservation of good relations with our employees, approximately 77% of whom are represented by unions.

            The following table reflects, as of December 31, 2008, our principal collective bargaining agreements and their respective amendable dates:

Employee Group	Number of Employees	Representing Union	Contract Amendable Date
Pilots and Instructors	2,125	Air Line Pilots Association, International	December 2010
Mechanics	920	International Brotherhood of Teamsters	August 2009
Flight Attendants	1,022	International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers	August 2010
Dispatchers	68	Transport Workers Union of America	July 2009
Production Workers	72	Union of Industrial Production Workers	N/A

            Our other employees are not covered by collective bargaining agreements.

Securities Exchange Act Reports

            Our corporate website address is www.expressjet.com.  In addition to other information, the following materials on our website are free of charge:

•  our reports and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), which are available as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC;

•  the Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by our Board of Directors establishing the general policies by which the Board operates;

•  the charters of the principal standing committees of our Board:  Audit, Human Resources, and  Nominating and Corporate Governance; and

•  the Principles of Conduct, which is our code of business conduct and ethics applicable to all of our directors and employees.

            Stockholders can print a copy of the foregoing materials from our website or may request a copy from the Secretary of the Company by writing to the address on the cover of this report.

            As described in the Principles of Conduct, we have established means for our employees to report concerns of questionable accounting, auditing and other business practices to our Director of Internal Audit and to our Corporate Compliance Officer.  Our employees may report concerns through an employee hotline and the following email address: xjtinternalaudit@expressjet.com.  Persons desiring to communicate with the independent members of our Board of Directors may also do so through this email address.

            On May 23, 2008, our Chief Executive Officer certified to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) that he was not aware of any violation by the Company of the Exchange's corporate governance listing standards.  In addition, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have made the certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which are included as exhibits to this report.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

            Our business, results of operations and financial condition may vary materially from those we anticipate, estimate or project due to risks arising primarily in five key areas:

•  our operations under the Continental CPA may no longer be profitable;

•  our Corporate Aviation operation and other aviation services may affect our ability to operate profitably;

•  our covenants under the amended indentures of our convertible notes and the profile of our current shareholders;

•  rising costs, the global economic recession and the highly competitive nature of the airline industry; and

•  regulations, including listing regulation for publicly-traded companies, and other factors.

Additionally, we may encounter risks in addition to those described in this report.  Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also adversely impair or offset our business, results of operation and financial condition.

Our operations under the Continental CPA may no longer be profitable.

            We amended and restated the Continental CPA on June 5, 2008.  The amendments became effective on July 1, 2008. In contrast to the Continental CPA in effect before the amendments, which had provided for us to earn a 10% margin on our expenses incurred flying as a regional carrier for Continental, the agreement now has fixed block hour rates, which are subject to an annual adjustment tied to a consumer price index (capped at 3.5% per annum).  Under the Amended Continental CPA, the ceiling for the annual adjustment noted above is 3.5%; however, there is no floor; therefore, in prolonged deflationary periods, the annual adjustment can be a negative percentage. The rates under the Amended Continental CPA are considerably lower than the pre-amendment rates and will result in lower overall revenues.  At this time, it is difficult to quantify the overall financial impact of the changes because the pre- and post-amendment agreements are substantially different, including with respect to the services covered.  Our results will depend, in part, on the timing of our fleet changes and how successful we are in reducing our operating costs.  We originally derived significant amounts of revenue from the reimbursement, plus the 10% margin, for aircraft rent, fuel and other expenses.  Those expenses, and the corresponding revenue, will no longer be reflected on our financial statements as they will be incurred directly by Continental.  Moreover, the rates we earn will be fixed and not tied to our expenses; consequently, we could be unprofitable if we do not manage our costs effectively.  We would need to aggressively reduce managed expenses under the agreement if aircraft are removed from service and returned to Continental.

            Our charter operation and other aviation services may affect our ability to operate profitably.

            The aircraft transitioned in 2006 from the Continental CPA and in 2008 from our Branded Flying operation to our Corporate Aviation division have been unprofitable to date.  Currently the aircraft deployed outside of the Continental CPA and the associated risks relate to over 12% of our fleet; however, if the Continental CPA were terminated, our fleet could be significantly reduced or these risks could extend across our entire fleet. The risks affecting our Corporate Aviation operations include:

•  our ability to obtain and finance any fleet expansion at acceptable rates of return;

•  our ability to create a profitable recognized brand and attract frequent group travelers;

•  the condition of the U.S. economy, including a prolonged global economic recession; and

•  competitive responses from other charter operators and aviation service providers.

            We remain dependent on Continental for the majority of our revenue and cash flows.

            We currently operate more than 87% of our fleet (214 aircraft) under the Continental CPA and so rely heavily on the financial and operational stability of Continental.  The domestic airline environment in the United States continues to be extremely challenging for all carriers and Continental experienced a loss in the fourth quarter and for the full year of 2008.  Continental has indicated that its own business and financial results are subject to a number of risk factors, many of which are uncontrollable, including the amount of debt it carries, volatile fuel prices, delays in scheduled aircraft deliveries, its high labor and pension costs, service interruptions at one of its hub airports, disruptions to the operations of any of its regional operators, disruptions in its computer systems, and industry conditions, including the airline pricing environment, an economic downturn in the U.S. and global economies, industry capacity decisions, industry consolidation, terrorist attacks, regulatory matters, excessive taxation, the availability and cost of insurance, public health threats and the seasonal nature of the airline business.

            We cannot predict the future impact of these factors on Continental.  Moreover, changes in fare structures (most importantly in relation to business fares), booking patterns, low-cost competitor growth, customers’ direct booking on the internet, volatile fuel prices, competitors emerging from bankruptcies with reduced cost structures, rumored industry consolidation and other changes in the industry cannot be predicted at this time, but could have a material adverse effect on both Continental’s and our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

            Our Continental CPA could be terminated.

            We currently operate 214 aircraft for Continental under the Continental CPA.  Although Continental no longer has the unilateral right to remove aircraft from the Continental CPA, Continental is permitted to reduce that number to a minimum of 190 aircraft after June 30, 2009. In the event that Continental exercises this right, the 190 aircraft will remain covered by the agreement through its scheduled June 30, 2015 expiration.  After a term of seven years, the Amended Continental CPA is scheduled to expire with no renewal or extension options.  Additionally, Continental can also terminate the agreement:

•  for cause, at any time without giving us notice or an opportunity to cure;

•  at any time upon our material breach that does not constitute cause, including our failure to complete a specified percentage of our scheduled flights, if the breach continues for 90 days after we receive notice of the breach;

•  at any time, upon two business days notice, and with no opportunity to cure, if Continental reasonably and in good faith determines, using recognized standards of safety, that there is a material safety concern with our operation of any flights under the agreement; and

•  at any time, without giving us notice or an opportunity to cure, if a change of control occurs as described in “—Continental Capacity Purchase and Other Agreements.”

            We could lose access to our aircraft, facilities and regulatory authorizations if the Continental CPA were terminated.

            We currently lease or sublease almost all of our aircraft from Continental.  If Continental terminated the Continental CPA for cause, it would have the right to terminate our leases and subleases for aircraft covered by the agreement at the time of termination.  Additionally, if Continental’s financial condition deteriorated and it filed for bankruptcy protection, it would have the ability to reject the leases or subleases on our aircraft.  There can be no assurance that Continental will have sufficient liquidity to fund its future operations and other financial obligations, especially in the event additional adverse factors beyond its control occur, such as declining passenger revenue mix from global economic recessions, volatile fuel prices, terrorist attacks or adverse regulatory rulings.

            Additionally, if the Continental CPA were terminated for any reason, including termination at the end of its term on June 30, 2015, we could lose access to some or substantially all of our airport facilities and other services that Continental currently provides to us, as well as our take-off and landing slots and route authorities.  Continental leases most of the airport facilities that we use.  We could be required to vacate the terminal facilities (or all facilities if the termination resulted from our material breach of the Continental CPA) that are subleased to us by Continental, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to assign to Continental or its designee any lease in our name where we fly for Continental.  Consequently, to offer commercial airline services in the same markets, we would have to arrange to use the same or other airport facilities, take-off or landing slots, route authorities and other regulatory authorizations used for scheduled flights at potentially higher rates.  We cannot provide any assurance that we would be able to gain appropriate access to airport facilities, slots or other authorizations, or would not incur a significant increase in our costs to do so.

            We may not be successful in retaining qualified personnel to maintain the current level of customer service and reliability.

            Labor costs constitute a significant percentage of our total operating costs, and wage rates, in general, are increasing.  To return to profitability, we reduced our work force significantly and obtained wage and salary concessions from each of our employees that remain.  Because of this, our employees may elect to seek other employment opportunities, thereby increasing our recruiting and training costs.  We cannot guarantee that we will be able to continue to find qualified personnel to fill our vacancies.  As our workforce matures, we may not be able to cover the resulting higher wage rates if competition or other conditions do not permit us to achieve sufficient revenues.  Approximately 77% of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements.  Deterioration in our labor relationships could significantly impact our operations and financial results.

            Consolidations in our industry can adversely impact our current business strategy.

            There have been numerous mergers and acquisitions within the U.S airline industry since its deregulation in 1978, and there may be additional mergers and acquisitions in the future.  Any airline industry consolidation could substantially alter the competitive landscape and may result in changes in our business strategy.  Although the majority of our current flying is under contractual obligations and, thus, is insulated somewhat from the immediate impact of any change of control, consolidation involving legacy carriers in our industry could, in the long run, result in the reduction of capacity for network-feed services to be provided by the regional carriers, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Amendments to the terms of the convertible notes increased our obligations and put our assets at risk.

            As a result and pursuant to the terms of the exchange offer, the Company issued 163,824,975 shares (pre-Reverse Split) of common stock in payment of the repurchase price for the principal amount of the 4.25% convertible notes due 2023 (the “Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023”) validly tendered.  Following the completion of the tender offer, the Company had $68.5 million aggregate principal of its Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 remaining outstanding.  As previously disclosed, we have unilaterally amended the indenture governing our convertible notes in order to provide improved terms and additional flexibility for the noteholders remaining after the exchange offer, including:

•  The obligations under the remaining notes are secured with a pro-rata portion (based on the portion that the remaining notes represent of the total convertible notes that were issued) of assets with an appraised value of approximately as of December 31, 2008 of $180.4 million, including approximately $96 million in spare parts and $85 million of spare engines;

•  The interest rate on the remaining notes was increased from 4.25% to 11.25% over the remaining note term; and

•  The noteholders have an additional put right on August 1, 2011.

            Noteholders of record on August 2, 2008, automatically began to receive the benefits of the supplemental indenture that become effective the same day.  From August 2 forward, the notes will be referred to as the “11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.”  The terms of the 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 could have important consequences by adversely affecting our financial condition and making it more difficult to satisfy our obligations under the notes and our other contractual and commercial commitments.  The amendments also increased the cash required to service the interest on the notes.  If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future, we may be required to take actions such as curtailing our business activities, reducing capital expenditures, selling assets, incurring additional debt or seeking bankruptcy protection.  We may not be able to accomplish any of these actions on terms acceptable to us, or at all.  In addition, if we are unable to repay our obligations under the notes, the trustee could seek to foreclose on the assets securing the notes.

            A significant percentage of our common stock outstanding is held by a small number of institutional stockholders.  These institutional stockholders may be able to exert significant control over the election of our Board of Directors and the management of our business and their interests may differ from those of our other stockholders.  

            As reported in their filings with the SEC, four large, institutional investors currently own or control a significant amount of our common stock.  By virtue of the number of shares they control, these stockholders may be able to significantly influence or control our management and affairs, and initiate or effect corporate transactions such as mergers, consolidation or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets.  The interests of these institutional investors may differ from that of other stockholders, with the result that the institutional investors may cause us to change our business strategy or objectives in ways that may not be viewed favorably by us, our strategic partners or other stockholders and may lead to increased costs.

Our common stock could be delisted from the NYSE.

            Our common stock could be delisted from the NYSE if we fail to maintain the continued listing standards applicable to our Company.

            We were notified in July 2008 from NYSE Regulation, Inc. that we were not in compliance with the NYSE $1.00 average share price continued listing standard.  We immediately pursued various solutions and worked closely with the NYSE to maintain our current listing.  As of January 20, 2009, we received a letter from the NYSE stating that we have cured such non-compliance and returned to good standing for our listing at the NYSE.  No further adverse actions will be taken by the NYSE at this time; however, considering the current global economic recession, the volatility of the stock market and the make-up of our current stockholders, we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to meet all the continued listing standards.  If we do not meet the standards, we could be subject to delisting, which would constitute a default under our convertible notes and could result in the obligation to repay the notes in cash at par.

            We may be responsible for additional taxes as a result of our tax agreement with Continental.

            We have a tax agreement with Continental that provides, among other things, for our payment to Continental of all or a significant portion of the tax benefits we realize as a result of an internal reorganization done prior to our initial public offering in 2002.  Since that time, we have made net payments of approximately $122.5 million to Continental under the agreement and could pay Continental as much as an additional $234.6 million through 2017.  See Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 10 Income Taxes” for a detailed discussion of our income taxes and the tax agreement.  If it were determined, as a result of an income tax audit or examination, that a significant amount of these tax benefits should not have been available, thus requiring us to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties to one or more tax authorities, and if at that time Continental were unable to indemnify us for these amounts as contemplated in the tax agreement, then we could be responsible for such tax payments, interest and penalties.

            We may be unable to obtain all of the parts or related support services we expect from Embraer to operate our aircraft.

            We operate a single fleet type produced by a single manufacturer; consequently, our operations could be materially adversely affected by:

•  Embraer’s inability to provide sufficient parts or related support services on a timely basis-- especially in light of its announcement to cease the production of our current fleet type;

•  the issuance of FAA directives restricting or prohibiting the use of Embraer regional jets or parts;

•  unscheduled or unanticipated maintenance requirements; or

•  force majeure events that prevent Embraer from performing under the lease agreement.

Conversely, if we choose to operate another aircraft type in the future, for a time we will not have the maintenance expertise we have acquired with our current fleet, training costs would increase, and parts and inventory costs would rise.

            Maintenance costs will likely increase as the average age of our fleet increases.

            Similar to other air carriers in our industry, as the average age of our fleet increases, our aircraft maintenance costs will likely increase.  We emphasize routine maintenance in addition to the inspection of our aircraft engines and airframes at intervals required by the FAA.  We perform line and heavy maintenance at our maintenance facilities and satellite stations located throughout the United States.

            Additionally, we have a “power-by-the-hour” agreement with Rolls Royce to maintain the engines on our aircraft through April 2015.  Under the agreement, we are charged a fixed rate based on flight hours incurred during a month.  The rates are subject to annual revisions based on specified labor and material indices.  We also have power-by-the-hour agreements with other vendors to cover various components and systems on our aircraft, and will continue to evaluate and implement similar agreements when the terms are favorable. 

            However, our average maintenance costs could increase and adversely impact our results of operations in the event that we have to address any new FAA or Embraer maintenance directives.  We are not aware of any such directives at this time that will adversely affect our maintenance costs.

            Reductions in insurance coverage or increases in rates could adversely impact our operations and financial results.

            The terrorist attacks of 2001 led to a significant increase in insurance premiums, as well as a decrease in the coverage available to commercial air carriers. We carry insurance for public liability, passenger liability, property damage and damage to our aircraft.  The Homeland Security Act of 2002 currently requires the federal government to provide third party, passenger, and hull war-risk insurance coverage to commercial air carriers through March 31, 2009.  If any of our insurance programs terminated, the Company would likely face a material increase in the cost of war-risk insurance.

            Our cost structure may not be competitive with some of our competitors.

            Our costs are mainly driven by the flight schedule determined by Continental, Continental’s own cost structure or factors that are outside our control, or in some instances even Continental’s control (such as aircraft rent, fuel, insurance, property taxes, etc.).  As a significant portion of our costs are wages that are contractually agreed with our labor work groups, we may not be able to restructure our costs effectively to compete with other carriers even though in the past we have been successful in our concessionary discussions.

            Our business is subject to extensive government regulation and we may incur additional costs to comply with such regulations.

            Our business is subject to extensive government regulation.  As evidenced by the enactment of the ATSA, airlines are subject to extensive regulatory and legal compliance requirements that can or may result in significant costs.  The FAA and other governmental agencies such as the EPA from time to time issue directives and other regulations relating to the maintenance and operation of aircraft that require significant expenditures.  Some requirements cover, among other things, security measures, collision avoidance systems, potable water standards, noise abatement and other environmental matters, commuter aircraft safety and increased inspections and maintenance procedures conducted on older aircraft.

            We expect to continue incurring expenses to comply with these regulations.  In addition, if any of these regulations caused us to cancel flights, it would result in a reduction in our revenue.

            Additional laws, regulations, taxes and airport rates and charges are proposed from time to time that could significantly increase the cost of airline operations or reduce revenue.  Such laws, taxes and regulations have affected all facets of our operations from security at airports, restrictions on landing, take-off, routes, restrictions on international routes (which can change suddenly depending on the current arrangements between the United States and the foreign governments), and increases in landing fees and other airport facility charges.  We cannot be certain that current laws or regulations, or laws or regulations enacted in the future, will not adversely affect us.

            We may be adversely affected by factors beyond our control, including weather conditions and the availability and cost of fuel.

            During periods of fog, icy conditions, storms, hurricanes or other adverse weather conditions, flights may be cancelled or significantly delayed.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, we are not protected against cancellations due to weather or air traffic control restrictions, which could adversely affect our operating results and our financial condition.

            Additionally, in operating our aircraft for other airlines or under charter contracts we may be exposed to the volatility of fuel prices.  Both the cost and availability of fuel are subject to various economic and political factors and events occurring throughout the world.  Significant changes or extended periods of high fuel cost or fuel supply disruptions could materially affect our operating results.  Our ability to pass on increased fuel costs through contract pricing is limited by several factors, including economic and competitive conditions.  Additionally, under the Continental CPA, if the unavailability of fuel caused us to cancel flights, our incentive revenue would be reduced.  The cost and availability of adequate supplies of fuel could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and our financial condition in the future.

            Our reliance on technology could be harmful in the event of system failure.

            Like other air carriers, we rely heavily on automated systems and technology to operate our business, including flight operations and telecommunications.  Any disruptions in these systems due to internal failures of technology or external interruptions, such as power outages, could result in the loss of critical data and/or cancellation of flights and have an adverse effect on our results of operations. 

            Our operations and financial condition could be adversely affected as a result of an aviation accident.

            An accident or incident involving one of our aircraft could involve repair or replacement of a damaged aircraft and its consequential temporary or permanent loss from service, as well as significant potential claims of injured passengers and others.  We are required by the DOT to carry liability insurance.  In the event of an accident, our liability insurance may not be adequate and we may be forced to bear substantial losses from the accident.  Substantial claims resulting from an accident in excess of our related insurance coverage would harm operational and financial results.  Moreover, any aircraft accident or incident, even if fully insured, could create a public perception that we are less safe or reliable than other airlines.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

            We do not have any unresolved comments from the SEC’s staff as of the date of this filing.

Item 2.  Properties

Flight Equipment

            As shown in the following table, our operating fleet consisted of 244 regional jets as of December 31, 2008. 

Type	Total Leased Aircraft	Options	Seats in Standard Configuration
ERJ-145XR	104	50	50
ERJ-145	134	—	50
ERJ-145	6	—	41
Total	244	50

            All 244 aircraft were placed into service prior to 2007.  Our options for the 50 ERJ-145XR aircraft may be exercised for some other types of aircraft within the ERJ-145 Family.  Our next option exercise date is April 1, 2009.  If we do not exercise or extend our option as of this date, 25 options will expire.  During 2005, Continental declined the right to include any of our option aircraft in the Continental CPA; consequently, Continental is not required to participate in the financing for any option aircraft that we acquire. 

Facilities

            Airports

            We lease all of our airport passenger facilities either directly with the airport authorities or in some cases, through arrangements with Continental, on a net-rental basis.  Our largest operational centers are at Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport, which is approximately 155,000 square feet, with 31 gates in Terminal B, Cleveland’s Hopkins International Airport, of which we have approximately 106,000 square feet and 12 gates in Terminal D, and Newark Liberty International Airport, where we operate out of Continental’s Terminal A with up to 14 passenger loading bridges and 16 aircraft parking positions.  In addition, at each of Continental's three domestic hubs and many other locations, our passenger and baggage handling space is provided by Continental on varying terms dependent on the prevailing practice at each airport.  If the Continental CPA were terminated, we might be required to vacate the terminal facilities (or all facilities if the termination resulted from our material breach of the agreement) that are subleased to us by Continental, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to transfer to Continental or its designee any lease in our name.  See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Our Business – Contract Flying – Continental CPA - Airport Facilities, Slots and Route Authorities."  For a period of five years following the termination of the Continental CPA, if we wanted to transfer our interests in any of our facilities used to fulfill our obligations under the agreement, Continental would need to consent to the transfer (where Continental is the sublessor) and has a right of first refusal to acquire our interests in those facilities that we lease from parties other than Continental.

            As of December 31, 2008, we continue to lease approximately 54,712 square feet of terminal space including two gates at LA/Ontario International airport, as well as approximately 11,900 square feet of terminal space, including approximately 14 gates at an additional 16 airports previously associated with our ExpressJet branded network.  Our facilities team is aggressively working to sublease or terminate those leases, some of which extend to 2010.  All expenses associated with the leases were recorded in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 after Branded Flying operations were suspended on September 2, 2008. 

Corporate Offices and Other

            Our Houston headquarters building is comprised of executive, administrative and operations control departments, occupying approximately 42,000 square feet of leased space.  We also lease a second building that consists of 18,000 square feet for executive and administrative staff and 50,000 square feet of production and warehouse space utilized by InTech.  Additionally, we lease a 57,000 square foot training center containing numerous simulators, training devices and corresponding training and administrative staff.  To reduce overhead expenses, we moved a majority of our executive and administrative staff to our headquarters building and are working to sublease the space.

Maintenance Facilities

            In addition to our airport passenger facilities, we currently operate seven major maintenance facilities (hangars/shops) in Houston, Cleveland, Newark, Knoxville, Shreveport, Ontario and Richmond, as well as four satellite line maintenance facilities in other cities.  Continental is the primary sublessor for these facilities, with the exception of the Ontario hangar and a shop and satellite maintenance station facility located in Lake Charles.  XJT Florida, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings, owns an approximately 74,000 square foot building in Miami, Florida that is leased to American Composites for use as a maintenance shop.  Additionally, XJT Mexico, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings, owns three buildings consisting of approximately 96,000 square feet of hangar space and 3,000 square feet of administrative space in Saltillo, Mexico that is leased to Saltillo Jet Center for use in its aircraft painting business.  We are responsible for maintenance, taxes, insurance and other facility-related expenses and services at these facilities. 

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

            We are a defendant in various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business.  While the outcome of these lawsuits and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, we believe that the ultimate disposition of these suits will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Environmental Proceedings

            We are and may from time to time become involved in environmental matters, including the investigation and/or remediation of environmental conditions at properties we use or were previously used by us.  We are not, however, currently subject to any environmental cleanup orders imposed by regulatory authorities, nor do we have any active investigations or remediation at this time.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

            None.

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

            Our common stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol “XJT.”  The table below shows the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on the Exchange’s composite tape for the periods indicated.

            Effective as of October 2, 2008, every 10 shares of our common stock was combined into one share of common stock through a reverse stock split.  The reverse stock split affected all shares of common stock and stock options of the Company outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the reverse stock split.  The following table reflects Reverse Split adjusted stock prices for periods prior to October 2, 2008.

		Common Stock
		High		Low
2008
First Quarter	$	35.40	$	15.00
Second Quarter	$	33.90	$	5.50
Third Quarter	$	6.70	$	1.60
Fourth Quarter	$	2.33	$	0.86
2007
First Quarter	$	96.10	$	57.80
Second Quarter	$	66.30	$	56.10
Third Quarter	$	64.50	$	30.30
Fourth Quarter	$	37.20	$	23.00

            As of February 27, 2009, there were approximately 170 holders of record of our common stock.

            We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no current intention of doing so.

Performance Graph

            The following graph compares the cumulative total return on our common stock with the cumulative total returns (assuming reinvestment of dividends) of the American Stock Exchange Airline Industry Index, the Russell 2000 Index and the NYSE Composite Index as if $100 were invested in our common stock and each of those indices on December 31, 2003. 

		12/31/03		12/31/04		12/30/05		12/29/06		12/31/07		12/31/08
ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.	$	100.00	$	85.87	$	53.93	$	54.00	$	16.53	$	1.13
American Stock Exchange Airline Industry   Index		100.00		97.90		88.69		94.98		55.89		39.53
Russell 2000 Index		100.00		117.00		120.88		141.43		137.55		89.68
NYSE Composite Index		100.00		112.57		120.40		141.90		151.24		89.39

            Our certificate of incorporation provides that no shares of capital stock may be voted by or at the direction of persons who are not United States citizens unless they are registered on a separate stock record.  Our bylaws further provide that no shares will be registered on this foreign stock record if the amount to be registered would exceed United States foreign ownership restrictions.  United States law currently limits the voting power in us (or any other U.S. airline) by persons who are not citizens of the United States to 25%.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period	(a) Total number of shares purchased(1)		(b) Average price paid per share	(c) Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program(2)		(d) Maximum value of shares / notes that may yet be purchased under the program (in millions)
October 1 to October 31, 2008	2,169	$	1.60	1,828,270	$	15.7	(3)
November 1 to November 30, 2008	—	$	—	442,109	$	25.1	(3)
December 1 to December 31, 2008	19	$	1.33	821,523	$	23.8	(3)
Total	2,188	$	1.61	3,091,902		10.1	(4)

(1)	Shares shown were withheld to satisfy individual employee tax obligations arising upon the vesting of restricted stock awards and do not count against our securities repurchase program.
(2)	Amounts shown relate to shares of our common stock repurchased within our Board approved securities repurchase program.
(3)	Amounts shown reflect the remaining balance available for repurchases of our common stock within our Board approved securities repurchase program.
(4)	Amounts shown reflect repurchases of our common stock, repurchases of our original 4.25% Convertible Notes and repurchases of our 11.25% Convertible Notes included within our Board approved securities repurchase program.

            In July 2005, our board of directors authorized the expenditure of up to $30 million to repurchase shares of our common stock.  In February 2006, the board authorized the inclusion of our 4.25% convertible notes due 2023 within the previously announced $30 million program.  On November 4, 2008, the Board authorized an additional $5 million to be utilized under the existing program. On November 20, 2008, the Board authorized an additional $10 million to be utilized under the program.

            We did not make any purchases of stock or notes under this program during 2006.  During 2007, we purchased 2.7 million shares of our common stock for $8.0 million and $2.5 million of our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes at par value.  In 2008, we purchased 4.0 million shares (Reverse Split adjusted) of our common stock, $6.5 million par value of our 4.25% convertible notes and $7.6 million par value ($4.5 million book value) of our 11.25% convertible notes for $10.8 million leaving a current balance of $10.1 million within the program for additional purchases.

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

            This selected financial data should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and Item 7.  “Management’s Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report.

            Our current primary business is providing air transportation services utilizing our fleet of 244 aircraft.  During 2007, we diversified our business from flying solely for one corporate customer to flying for several, including the general public under our own brand.  Prior to 2007, we derived substantially all of our revenues from our Continental Express operations.  During 2008 we dramatically reshaped our business as we suspended our Branded Flying operations and mutually terminated agreements with Delta due to record fuel prices to focus on our contractual arrangements with Continental and our Corporate Aviation division.

            The following selected financial data, excluding operating statistics, have been derived from our audited financial statements.  The financial information included in this report is not necessarily indicative of our future results of operations, financial position and cash flows.  For a discussion of some of the key factors that could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows, please refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors."

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008(6)			2007(6)			2006		2005			2004
		(In thousands, except per share data) (Reverse Split adjusted)
Statement of Operations Data:
Operating revenue (2),(5)	$	1,318,213		$	1,685,545		$	1,682,156	$	1,562,818		$	1,507,524
Operating expenses (2), (3)		1,434,668			1,792,416			1,541,085		1,406,275			1,302,097
Operating income / (loss)		(116,455	)		(106,871	)		141,071		156,543			205,427
Nonoperating income (expense), net (4)		23,663			(1	)		5,385		(2,309	)		(7,423	)
Net income / (loss)		(88,195	)		(70,248	)		92,565		97,993			122,771
Basic earnings / (loss) per share (1)		(7.83	)		(13.08	)		17.18		18.10			22.60
Diluted earnings / (loss) per share (1)		(7.83	)		(13.08	)		15.64		16.50			20.40
Weighted average number of shares used   in computations:
Basic (1)		11,265			5,369			5,386		5,412			5,422
Diluted (1)		11,265			5,369			6,153		6,172			6,178

(1)	See Item 8.  “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 11 – Earnings / (Loss) per Share” for the reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic earnings per share to the numerator and denominator of diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. Shares and per share data figures for 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004 have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Split that occurred in 2008.
(2)	Our operating revenue and operating expenses for 2008, 2007 and 2006 include reclassifications between operating expense line items and between operating revenue and operating expenses.  These reclassifications were not material to previous years.
(3)	Our operating expenses for 2008 include impairment of fixed assets and goodwill of $20.8 million and special charges of $22.4 million.
(4)	Nonoperating income (expense), net includes a gain from discount of $27.8 million, settlement of fuel contracts of $23.1 million and impairment charges on investments totaling $21.5 million.
(5)	Reimbursable costs under the Continental CPA are recorded to revenue.  The reimbursable expenses are different under the terms of the Amended Continental CPA versus the Original CPA, and therefore revenues are inconsistent with prior periods, beginning July 2008.
(6)	In April 2007, we launched our Branded Flying operation which resulted in our being at-risk for all expenses, including fuel and marketing expenses.  These operations were suspended in September 2008.

		As of December 31,
		2008		2007		2006		2005		2004
		(In thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term   investments (including restricted cash)	$	119,357	$	214,279	$	302,860	$	236,503	$	215,151
Amounts due from Continental, net		—		—		—		4,832		—
Total assets		388,889		597,608		637,029		560,270		543,244
Amounts due to Continental, net		1,539		4,726		3,522		—		11,239
Note payable to Continental		—		—		—		17,545		98,804
Other long-term debt and capital lease   obligations, including current maturities (1) (2)		49,061		147,698		152,721		154,305		161,012
Stockholders' equity		202,461		232,440		304,314		208,510		114,044

(1)

Beginning July 1, 2003, our Series A Cumulative Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) was classified as long-term debt in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 150 – “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.”  Reclassification of the prior year financial statements was made to conform to this accounting standard.  In April 2005, we redeemed this stock.

(2)

Subsequent to August 1, 2008, our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 were reclassified from current liabilities to long-term liabilities as the next repurchase date is August 1, 2011.  See Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 9 – Long-term Debt.”

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008		2007		2006		2005		2004
Operating Statistics:
Revenue passenger miles (millions) (1)	9,564		10,071		10,297		8,938		7,417
Available seat miles (millions) (2)	12,606		13,575		13,200		11,973		10,410
Passenger load factor (3)	75.9	%	74.2	%	78.0	%	74.7	%	71.3	%
Operating cost per available seat mile (cents) (4)	11.38		13.20		11.67		11.75		12.51
Block hours (5)	828,840		916,756		916,718		827,369		729,698
Operating cost per block hour (dollars) (6)	1,731		1,956		1,681		1,700		1,784
Departures	433,289		489,489		491,598		449,928		405,055
Average price per gallon of fuel, including fuel   taxes (cents) (7)	132.00		100.00		71.20		71.20		71.20
Fuel gallons consumed (millions)	172.9		323.2		319.1		295.5		262.8
Average length of aircraft flight (miles)	594		569		549		545		528
Average daily utilization of each aircraft (hours) (8)	8.50		9.17		9.24		8.87		8.51
Completion factor	97.4	%	97.6	%	97.9	%	97.7	%	98.4	%
Revenue passengers (thousands)	15,629		17,365		18,173		16,076		13,659
Actual aircraft in fleet at end of period	244		274		274		266		245

(1)	Revenue passenger miles are the number of scheduled miles flown by revenue passengers.
(2)	Available seat miles are the number of passenger seats available multiplied by the number of scheduled miles those seats are flown.
(3)	Passenger load factor equals revenue passenger miles divided by available seat miles.
(4)	Operating cost per available seat mile is operating costs divided by available seat miles.  The reimbursable expenses are different under the terms of the Amended Continental CPA versus the Original Continental CPA, and therefore costs are inconsistent with prior periods, beginning July 2008.
(5)	Block hours are the hours from gate departure to gate arrival.
(6)	Operating cost per block hour is operating costs divided by block hours.
(7)	Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for the cost of providing fuel for all flights and, therefore, effective July 1, 2008, fuel expense is no longer included in our statements of operations for our Continental Express flying.  Prior to July 1, 2008 under our fuel purchase agreement with Continental, fuel and fuel tax expense were reconciled to the lower of the actual costs or the agreed-upon caps.  Since 2003, our caps on fuel and fuel taxes, for aircraft operating under the Continental CPA, have been 66.0 cents and 5.2 cents per gallon, respectively.  In 2007, our fuel activity included purchases to support our various business platforms outside of the Continental CPA.  These purchases were executed through an agreement with an independent third party at an average price per gallon of $2.43, which represents 16.7% of our total fuel consumption for 2007.
(8)	Average daily utilization of each aircraft is the average number of block hours per day that an aircraft in revenue service is operated.

Item 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

            The information contained in this section has been derived from, is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained in “Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report.  This section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  Our actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those described in “Forward-Looking Statements” and in Item 1A.  “Risk Factors.”

Overview

            The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to help the reader understand our operations and our current business environment.  MD&A is provided as a supplement to—and should be read in conjunction with—our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained in "Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report. This overview summarizes MD&A, which includes the following sections:

•  Our Business — a general description of our business, including our business segments; our objective; our areas of focus; and challenges and risks of our business.

•  Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — a discussion of accounting policies that require critical judgments and estimates.

•  Operations Review — an analysis of our consolidated results of operations, including appropriate segment disclosures, for the three years presented in our consolidated financial statements.

•  Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position — an analysis of cash flows; off–balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations; an overview of financial position; and the impact of inflation and changing prices.

Our Business

General

Holdings is engaged in the business of moving people.  Our principal asset is all of the issued and outstanding shares of stock of XJT Holdings, Inc., the sole stockholder of ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. (referred to in this report as “Airlines” and, together with Holdings, as “ExpressJet”, “we” or “us”).  Airlines currently operates a fleet of 244 aircraft.  As of December 31, 2008, our fleet was assigned as follows: 

•  214 aircraft for Continental as Continental Express pursuant to the Continental CPA; and

•  30 aircraft in our Corporate Aviation division, which is dedicated to charter contracts and ad-hoc charter service.

Our primary business is flying 244 aircraft under contractual arrangements for network carriers or entities desiring cost-effective and fully customizable group travel.  During 2008 we dramatically reshaped our business in order to adapt to the unprecedented high fuel costs, recessions in the global economy, air-travel capacity cuts worldwide, and other uncertainties facing the regional airlines.  We completed most of our transition to the contractually-arranged flying during the fourth quarter ending December 31, 2008, under the terms of the Amended Continental CPA which provides for lower block hour rates and various costs, primarily fuel and aircraft rent, are no longer reimbursable.  Additionally, we strengthened our balance sheet through the completion of the refinancing of our convertible debt, reducing the debt from $134.7 million as of December 31, 2007, to $60.8 million as of December 31, 2008.  We have stabilized the use of operating cash, as results of the termination of our Branded Flying operations.   Furthermore, we mutually agreed with Delta to terminate the Delta CPA and the Delta Prorate effective September 2, 2008.  As a result of the Amended Continental CPA, the cessation of Branded Flying and our restructuring efforts, the results of operations for fiscal 2008 are not comparable with prior periods.

            We also provide aviation services, such as ground-handling at airport locations across the United States, as well as aircraft repair, overhaul, interior refurbishments and paint, through Services, our wholly owned subsidiary, and a majority owned subsidiary, Saltillo.

            Holdings was incorporated in Delaware in August 1996.  Airlines is one of the largest regional airlines in the world, based on 2008 available seat miles, number of regional jets and passengers transported.

            We compete with a number of regional airlines for the service we provide to other airlines.  We believe that our continuing success depends on our ability to provide our charter customers and Continental outstanding operational performance and exceptional customer service through our commitment to detail, quick responses and follow-through.  Our ability to do this depends on our over 5,400 employees executing effectively on a daily basis.

            Our goal is to use our assets, including our operational and financial strength and the strong commitment of management and employees, to continuously move people cost-effectively and efficiently for our clients, improve our competitive position and provide value to our stockholders.

            Liquidity

With the significant savings provided to Continental under the Amended Continental CPA, aircraft withdrawals, dramatically lower utilization, the global economic recession and the difficulties in obtaining any financing in the current banking environment, we believe that cost savings and cash preservation are crucial to sustain our liquidity and meet our financial obligations throughout 2009.  In January 2008, we purchased $65 million (par value) of auction rate securities (“ARS”).  Since that time these auctions have been failing and accordingly, we have been unable to sell these securities and convert them to cash due to the general illiquidity in the ARS market.  As of December 31, 2008 the fair value of these securities was $41.4 million.  Additional cost savings initiatives are essential at this time to maintain an appropriate operating margin and preserve our cash.  These include, individually or in combination, if required:

•  continue to measure and deliver a full year of benefits from prior wage and benefit concessions from all of our employees;

•  evaluate necessary reduction-in-force to match reduction-in-capacity;

•  collaborate with third-party vendor to cut supply costs;

•  manage working capital effectively (i.e., accounts payable, accounts receivable, and inventory);

•  borrow against or liquidate our auction rate securities (“ARS”) holdings;

•  sell unencumbered assets, tangible or intangible, or subleasing the aircraft we lease from Continental; and

•  manage capital expenditures to only those required by law or operational necessities.

We believe that our existing liquidity and projected 2009 cash flows, including the incremental sources of liquidity described above will be sufficient to fund current operations and our financial obligations through December 31, 2009.  However, as noted in Item 1A. “Risk Factors”, factors outside of our control may dictate that we alter our current plans and expectations and could have a material adverse impact on our ability to sustain operations over the long term.

            Our Business Segments

            For the year ended December 31, 2008 and prior, ExpressJet had three reportable segments which are the basis of our internal financial reporting:  Contract Flying, Branded Flying and Aviation Services.

            Contract Flying includes our Corporate Aviation division and our capacity purchase agreements with Continental and Delta.  Under Contract Flying, revenues are contractually determined, eliminating our exposure to fluctuations in fuel prices, fare competition and passenger volumes.  Under these arrangements, our partners bear the revenue risk and cost of marketing, distributing and selling seats directly to passengers on our aircraft while we are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the aircraft.

            Branded Flying includes operations under the ExpressJet brand and the Delta Prorate.  Revenues for this flying are derived from passengers flying on scheduled air service.  We are responsible for local market pricing, scheduling and revenue management, and the operation and maintenance of the aircraft.  Our flying under the Delta Prorate provides us with a prorated portion of the airfare plus an incentive for passengers connecting onto Delta's network. 

            Aviation Services includes our ground-handling services pursuant to contracts with Continental and other airlines at airport locations across the United States, as well as those performed by Services.  These entities provide composite, sheet metal, paint, interior (including seat refurbishment) and thrust reverser repairs throughout our five facilities in the United States and Mexico. 

Our Objective

            Our goal is to use our assets and capabilities, including reliable operation performance, brand, financial strength, distribution system, and a strong commitment by our management and employees to achieve long-term sustainable growth. Our plans for sustainable growth include the following:

•  Being a great place to work where people are encouraged to achieve their best performance.

•  Delivering the best products and services to a diversified base of customers.

•  Establishing a winning network of partners and develop ways to expand these relationships.

•  Maximizing the return to our stockholders while being mindful of our overall responsibilities to all stakeholders.

            Contract Flying – Continental CPA

            General.  A significant portion of our revenue and cash flows is attributable to the Continental CPA.  Under the Continental CPA, Airlines operates flights on behalf of Continental as Continental Express.  Continental controls and is responsible for scheduling, pricing and managing seat inventories and is entitled to all revenue associated with the operation of the aircraft.  We also have various other agreements with Continental that govern our relationship.

            Under the Continental CPA, all marketing-related costs normally associated with operating an airline are borne by Continental.  These costs include:

•  reservations and sales;                                                                                                           

•  commissions;

•  advertising;

•  revenue accounting;

•  fare and tariff filings; and

•  food and beverage service.

2008 Amended Continental CPA (“Amended Continental CPA”).  Prior to July 1, 2008, Airlines was entitled to receive payment for each block hour that Continental scheduled it to fly pursuant to the terms of the Continental CPA.  Payment was based on a formula designed to provide Airlines with a target operating margin of 10% before taking into account variations in certain costs and expenses that were generally within our control.  We had exposure for most labor costs and some maintenance and general administrative expenses if actual costs were higher than those budgeted in our block hour rates.  For the first six months of 2008, we recognized revenues using 2007 block hour rates, pursuant to our agreement with Continental reached in June 2008.

            At such time, we also reached an agreement with Continental to amend the existing Continental CPA.  The Amended Continental CPA, which became effective July 1, 2008, allows us to continue flying, at minimum, 205 aircraft for Continental for seven years while providing Continental the right after one year to reduce the number of aircraft to a minimum of 190.  The Amended Continental CPA significantly reduces Continental’s governance rights under the original agreement, including easing change-in-control limitations on ExpressJet, reducing restrictions on our flying into Continental’s hub airports, and removing the most-favored-nation clause, allowing us the option to fly for other carriers and to consider other strategic alternatives.  The Amended Continental CPA also removes Continental’s ability to terminate the agreement without cause.

            The Amended Continental CPA provides payments to us at a pre-determined rate based on block hours flown and reimburses us for various pass-through expenses including passenger liability insurance, hull insurance, war risk insurance, landing fees and substantially all regional jet engine expenses under current long-term third-party contracts with no margin or mark-up.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for the cost of providing fuel for all flights and for paying aircraft rent for all aircraft covered by the Amended Continental CPA and, therefore, these items are not included in our consolidated statements of operations for periods subsequent to July 1, 2008.  The fixed block hour rates are considerably lower than the rates under the original agreement and will be subject to annual escalations tied to a consumer price index (capped at 3.5%) at each anniversary date, July 1.  During 2008, we returned pursuant to our rights under the Amended Continental CPA, we returned 30 aircraft with Continental bearing the expense related to the aircraft following their return.  We will continue to operate at least 205 aircraft for Continental through June 30, 2009.  Beginning on July 1, 2009, Continental can remove up to 15 aircraft making the new minimum aircraft requirement under the agreement 190.  Therefore we will continue to focus on aggressively managing costs in response to the Amended Continental CPA and the economic difficulties facing the entire airline industry.

            In September 2008, we agreed with Continental on the first amendment to the Amended Continental CPA in order to compensate us for our fixed costs, considered in the calculation of the pre-determined block hour rates, that cannot be reduced as a result of the unanticipated reduction in aircraft utilization by Continental’s scheduling. We also agreed that if Continental, beginning in year two, increases its aircraft utilization above a pre-determined threshold, then it may receive discounts on the agreed, pre-determined block hour rates.  For the last six months of 2008, we recognized an additional $3.4 million in contract revenues as compensation for shortfalls in aircraft utilization.

            In December 2008, we agreed with Continental on the second amendment to the Amended Continental CPA in order to clarify certain issues related to our revenue recognition, the fuel efficiency program in place in connection with the Amended Continental CPA and depreciation related to the aircraft we operate for Continental and excess inventory related thereto.

            Concurrently with the execution of the Amended Continental CPA, we entered into a settlement agreement with Continental to release the parties’ claims relating to certain identified payments under the Original Continental CPA, including disputes previously disclosed as possible matters for arbitration.

            Prior Years’ Settlements of the Continental CPA.  Airlines was entitled to receive payment for each block hour that Continental scheduled it to fly.  Payment was based on a formula designed to provide Airlines with a target operating margin before taking into account variations in certain costs and expenses that were generally within our control.  We had exposure for most labor costs and some maintenance and general administrative expenses if actual costs were higher than those budgeted in our block hour rates.  Prior years’ payment methodologies are described in the following paragraphs.

            2005-2007.  As part of the 2005 rate negotiation, we agreed to cap Airlines’ prevailing margin at 10.0% in an attempt to ensure the long-term stability of the Continental CPA.  Airlines also began including previously unreconciled costs, as discussed above, within the margin band, although it was not reimbursed if these costs are higher and cause its prevailing margin to fall below the 8.5% margin floor.  Airlines remained entitled to receive incentive payments from Continental if its rate of controllable cancellations was lower than its historical benchmark, but was no longer required to pay Continental a penalty for controllable cancellations unless the rate rises above 0.5%.  Airlines continued to receive a small per-passenger fee and incentive payments for certain on-time departure and baggage handling performance.

            The table below describes how variations between Airlines’ actual costs and estimated costs, as determined in the block hour rates, were treated under the Continental CPA from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2008.

Fully reconciled costs: reconciliation payment, including 10% margin, to the full extent actual costs differ from estimated costs.
• Fuel and into-plane expenses(1)  • Aircraft rent  • Terminal facility rent  • On-time bonuses and 401(k) company     match under current plans  • Taxes (other than income taxes)  • Passenger liability insurance  • Hull insurance  • War risk insurance  • Landing fees  • Ground handling services	• Administrative services provided by     Continental  • Third-party security and screening     expenses  • Substantially all regional jet engine     expenses under current long-term     third-party contracts  • Depreciation and amortization(2)  • Glycol, de-icing, snow removal  • International navigational fees
Costs within the margin band: if actual expenses in this category are sufficiently different from estimates used in the block hour rates so that the prevailing margin is less than 8.5% or greater than 10.0%, then a reconciliation payment is made by either Continental or Airlines to the other so that this prevailing margin will be 8.5% or 10.0%, as applicable.  If the prevailing margin is less than 8.5% due to impact of certain costs, as described below, or if the prevailing margin is above 10.0% due to other items(3), no reconciliation payments would be made from either Continental or Airlines.
• Maintenance, materials and repairs not     included above  • Passenger services	• Other rental expenses  • Other operating expenses

(1)	Under our fuel purchase agreement with Continental, fuel and fuel tax expense are reconciled to the  lower of the actual costs or the agreed-upon caps of 66.0 cents per gallon and 5.2 cents per gallon, respectively.  If the fuel purchase agreement with Continental were not in place, the fuel cost, including related taxes, would have been $2.43, $2.04 and $1.80 per gallon for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively.
(2)	Depreciation is reconciled for assets and capital projects accounted for in the Continental CPA or those approved by Continental outside of the agreement.
(3)	The prevailing margin used to calculate the reconciliation payment does not take into account performance incentive payments, including payments from controllable cancellation performance, litigation costs above a historical benchmark and other costs that are not included in the block hour rates (or covered by adjustments to them) or are not reasonable and customary in the industry.

            In 2007, the fully reconciled costs and costs within the margin band under the Continental CPA represented approximately 59% and 40% of operating costs associated with Continental CPA flying, respectively, in addition to 1% of costs related to the Continental CPA which could not be included in either reimbursable grouping such as certain labor and arbitration costs.  In 2006, the fully reconciled costs and costs within the margin band under the Continental CPA represented approximately 63% and 35% of operating costs associated with Continental CPA flying, respectively.  The remaining 2% of operating costs in 2006 were incurred outside of the Continental CPA in order to support our diversification strategies for the 69 aircraft released from the Continental CPA as well as the administrative operations we assumed from Continental in 2007.

            Some costs that were unreconciled under the Continental CPA prior to 2005 now require Airlines to make a reconciliation payment to Continental if the differences cause the prevailing margin to be greater than 10.0%.  However, if the differences cause the prevailing margin to be less than 8.5%, they remain unreconciled.  These costs are:

•  wages and salaries; and                                                                                                      

•  benefits not included in the table above.

2007 Arbitration.  In 2006, Continental challenged our interpretation of the Continental CPA and sought to impose rates for 2007 that we believed were inconsistent with the methodology established in the agreement.  We were unable to agree on the 2007 rates and, in accordance with the terms of the Continental CPA, we submitted our dispute to binding arbitration.  The arbitration panel determined that the annual 2007 budgeted rates originally presented by Airlines should be reduced in the aggregate by $14.2 million (or less than 1.0% of our total Continental CPA operating revenue), which included the 10% target operating margin.  Although we believe our original rates were appropriate, we were pleased with the panel’s decision.  The 2007 scheduled block hour rates were finalized in October 2007, and we recorded our passenger revenue under the Continental CPA using the block hour rates determined by the panel for all of 2007.

            Scope of Agreement.  As of December 31, 2008, the Amended Continental CPA covered 214 of Airlines’ existing fleet of 244 aircraft.  Under the agreement, Continental is obligated to have a minimum of 205 aircraft covered under the Amended Continental CPA through June 30, 2009.  Thereafter, the agreement calls for a minimum of 190 aircraft.  The agreement permits us to fly under our own code or on behalf of other airlines but prohibits our flying in certain markets under our own branded service.  The Amended Continental CPA states that:

•  at Continental’s hubs, we may not fly scheduled service under our own brand; 

•  at Continental’s hubs, we are permitted to operate our charter service and fly on behalf of other airlines; and

•  we cannot operate any of our aircraft subject to the agreement or use our passenger-related airport facilities employed under the agreement for other carriers or for flights under our own code.

            Our license from Continental to use the Continental Express name and other trademarks is non-exclusive.

            The Amended Continental CPA has a seven year term that is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2015.  Continental does not have the ability to terminate the agreement without cause prior to the termination date and cannot reduce the number of aircraft covered under the agreement below 190 aircraft.  However, the Amended Continental CPA may cover less than 190 aircraft if there is an expiration of a Covered Aircraft head lease and there are no fifty-seat replacement aircraft (among the original 274 aircraft) being stored on behalf of Continental.  If, at any time prior to the end of the Amended Continental CPA term, Continental proposes to engage any third party to operate one of the original 274 aircraft, we shall have the right of first opportunity to operate that aircraft.

            So long as scheduled flights under the Continental CPA represent at least 50% of all our scheduled flights, or at least 200 of our aircraft are covered by the agreement, we are required to allocate our crews, maintenance personnel, facilities and other resources on a priority basis to scheduled flights under the agreement above all of our other flights and aircraft.

            Aircraft Financing.  Airlines currently leases or subleases all of its existing aircraft from Continental.  Under the Continental CPA, Continental is required to purchase or lease from Embraer or its designee aircraft operated under the agreement, participate in the financing and to lease or sublease these aircraft to us.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental pays for the aircraft rent for all aircraft covered by the Amended Continental CPA directly and therefore, we will not include this expense for Covered Aircraft in our statement of operations beginning July 1, 2008.  Aircraft withdrawn from the Continental CPA become “Uncovered Aircraft” as defined in the agreement. 

            Prior to the Amended Continental CPA, we were subleasing 69 Uncovered Aircraft from Continental.  As part of the amendment, we returned 39 aircraft to Continental and continue to sublease 30 aircraft from Continental at substantially reduced rental rates.

            We have the option to purchase up to an additional 50 Embraer ERJ-145XR aircraft.  Our next option exercise date is April 1, 2009.  If we do not exercise or extend our option as of this date, 25 options will expire.  These aircraft would be Uncovered Aircraft since Continental has declined to include them under the Continental CPA.  These options may be exercised for other types of aircraft within the ERJ-145 line of aircraft, which include the ERJ-135 and ERJ-145.  We would need to finance our acquisition of these aircraft independently.  Continental does not have any obligation to finance, arrange to finance or participate in the financing of any aircraft acquired for operations outside the Continental CPA.

            We do not have the right to retain any aircraft removed from the Amended Continental CPA for use in our other operations if (i) they are removed by Continental as the result of its termination of the agreement for cause, (ii) we have already retained 150 aircraft, including the 30 being retained at reduced rent, or (iii) they are among aircraft owned by Continental, currently 18 aircraft.  In all other events, we can elect to retain any of the aircraft withdrawn from the Amended Continental CPA, most likely upon termination of the agreement, either at the end of seven years or upon early termination of the aircraft lease.  In certain circumstances, in order to retain the aircraft we will have to provide Continental with a full release from the head lease for such aircraft.  Depending on the type of termination, there are procedures for notice and time for us to elect how many aircraft we will retain (with Continental selecting the individual aircraft and engines), wind-down schedules of differing lengths, and maintenance reimbursements.

            Airport Facilities, Slots and Route Authorities.  Most of the airport facilities that Airlines uses in its Continental Express operation are leased from airport authorities by Continental.  Under Airlines’ master facility and ground handling agreement with Continental, Airlines is entitled to use these facilities to fulfill its obligations under the Continental CPA.  However, it is not permitted to use airport terminal facilities leased by Continental to service other carriers or operate flights under its own code without Continental’s approval.  Furthermore, we must use those facilities that are non-terminal facilities on a priority basis to support the scheduled flights that Airlines flies on behalf of Continental so long as those flights constitute at least 50% of our total scheduled flights or at least 200 of our aircraft are covered by the Continental CPA.

            Under the Continental CPA, all terminal facility rent at Continental-managed airports is borne by Continental.  At locations Airlines manages, rent is allocated between Continental and Airlines based on the number of each carrier’s respective passengers.  We are currently in the process of transitioning the station management of all stations under the Continental CPA to Continental.  It is anticipated that this transition will be complete by March 31, 2009.  Under these scenarios, we may continue to provide ground handling and support services under an industry-standard ground handling agreement; however, Continental will be responsible for the station’s fixed expenses.

            Continental is generally responsible for all capital and start-up costs for airport terminal facilities at its hub airports and at any other facilities where it elects to provide ground handling services to Airlines.  If Continental elects to provide ground handling services at any facility where Airlines previously did so, Continental is required to reimburse Airlines at the net book value for all fixtures and other unremovable capitalized items Airlines funded at that facility.  We are generally responsible for capital and start-up costs associated with airport terminal facilities where Airlines flies and any non-terminal facilities not regularly used by Continental.  If Airlines exits a market at the direction of Continental (and we do not re-enter that market within six months flying under our own code or that of an airline other than Continental), Continental will reimburse us for certain book and severance losses incurred in connection with the closure of the related facility. If the Continental CPA is terminated, we may be required to vacate the terminal facilities (or all facilities if the termination results from our material breach of the agreement) that are subleased to Airlines by Continental, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to assign to Continental or its designee any of the facility leases in our name.

            Ground Handling.  Airlines provides ground handling and other support services, including baggage handling, station operations, ticketing, gate access and other passenger, aircraft and traffic servicing functions for Continental at several of our airport locations.  In exchange, Continental pays us an amount equal to Airlines’ incremental cost for providing these services.  Continental provides the same services for Airlines at its stations, including its hub airports.  The cost for these services is based on the number of scheduled aircraft and the rates stipulated in the Continental CPA.  Effective January 1, 2007, we began providing ground handling and other support services at fixed rates for other Continental Airlines regional service providers including Republic and Colgan that operate under the Continental Express banner at 15 Continental/Continental Express stations.  Additionally, during 2008, Continental began transitioning our ground handling services at all of their airport locations to an all Continental managed program, with us providing specific ground handling services at a majority of these stations under an industry-standard ground handling agreement at fixed rates, outside of the Continental CPA. These services will be reflected in our Aviation Services line of business.

            Most Favored Nations.  As part of the Amended Continental CPA, the most favored nations clause was removed.  We are free to negotiate capacity purchase agreements with other airlines without any impact to our Continental CPA.

            Change of Control.  If we experience a change of control without Continental’s consent, Continental can terminate the Amended Continental CPA for breach.  Under the agreement, a change of control of our Branded Flying is defined as:

•  our merger or consolidation with a Major Network Carrier other than Continental, which is defined as Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Delta, Southwest Airlines, United and US Airways (or their successors)

•  the acquisition by a Major Network Carrier or any other entity, or group of entities acting in concert with a Major Network Carrier, other than Continental and its subsidiaries, of more than 25% of our capital stock or voting rights;

•  our acquisition of 25% or more of the capital stock of a Major Network Carrier (other than Continental and its successors and any subsidiaries);

•  our acquisition of all or substantially all airline assets of a Major Network Carrier;

•  the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our airline assets to a Major Network Carrier other than Continental;

•  our entering into definitive agreements relating to the foregoing matters.

            Labor Disruption.  Upon the occurrence of a union-authorized labor strike, the Continental CPA provides that:

•  Airlines will be compensated only for the flights it completes;

•  on each of the 2nd, 15th, 30th, 45th, 60th and 75th days of the strike, Continental will be entitled to terminate Airlines’ leases or subleases for, and take immediate possession of, up to 20 of Airlines’ aircraft covered by the agreement, up to a maximum of 120 aircraft if the strike extends to the 75th day;

•  we will be required to provide to Continental or its designee, for the duration of the strike and 180 days thereafter, at market rates, first-priority access to all of our flight simulators, hangars, training and other facilities and inventory to the extent necessary to enable Continental or their designee to operate any aircraft of which Continental takes possession as a result of the strike; and

•  if the strike results in our failure to complete at least 75% of our scheduled flights for three consecutive days, Continental is entitled to terminate the agreement for breach.

            In addition, a labor disruption other than a union-authorized strike may cause us to be in material breach of the Continental CPA.  Under the agreement, whenever Airlines fails to complete at least 90% of its aggregate scheduled flights (based on available seat miles) in three consecutive calendar months or at least 75% of its aggregate scheduled flights (based on available seat miles) in any 45-day period (in each case, excluding flights cancelled due to union-authorized labor strikes, weather, air traffic control or non-carrier specific airworthiness directives or regulatory orders), we will be deemed to be in material breach of the agreement.  In addition, if we have a controllable completion factor for any two consecutive months of 97.5% or below, or a controllable on-time departure rate for any 60 consecutive days of 82.5% or below, we will be in material breach of the agreement.  A labor disruption other than a union-authorized strike could cause Airlines to fail to meet these operational requirements and, as a result, cause us to be in material breach of the agreement.  See further discussions below regarding remedies for breach of the agreement by either Continental or us.

            Term and Termination of Agreement and Remedies for Breach.  The Continental CPA is scheduled to terminate on June 30, 2015.  Continental may terminate the agreement for cause without notice.  “Cause” is defined as:

•  our bankruptcy;

•  suspension or revocation of Airlines’ authority to operate as a scheduled airline;

•  cessation of Airlines’ operations as a scheduled airline, other than as a result of a union-authorized labor strike or any temporary cessation not to exceed 14 days;

•  a union-authorized labor strike that continues for 90 days; or

•  our intentional or willful material breach that substantially deprives Continental of the benefits of the agreement, which is not cured within 90 days of notice of the breach.

            Continental may also terminate the agreement at any time upon our material breach that does not constitute cause, but continues uncured for 90 days after we receive notice of the breach.  In addition, Continental may terminate the agreement immediately without notice or giving us an opportunity to cure if it makes a reasonable and good faith determination, using recognized standards of safety, that there is a material safety concern with our operation of any flights under the Continental CPA.

            If Continental materially breaches the agreement and fails to cure the breach within 60 days after we notify it of the breach, we will be entitled to obtain our payments directly from an airline clearing house from the 60th day for the duration of the default.  In addition, Continental and we are each entitled to seek damages in arbitration and to reach equitable remedies.

            Disposition of Aircraft upon Early Termination.  If Continental terminates the Continental CPA for cause or breach, it will also have the right at that time to terminate Airlines’ leases or subleases for aircraft covered by the agreement and take possession of these aircraft.

            Amendment of Embraer and Rolls Royce Contracts.  We are prohibited, without Continental’s consent, from amending Airlines’ aircraft purchase agreements with Embraer for the current 274 aircraft to change the pricing, financing or leasing arrangements, or to make any other changes that may be expected to adversely affect Continental’s rights under the Continental CPA or our ability to perform our obligations under the agreement.  We have also agreed to acquire Continental’s consent for any amendment of Airlines’ Embraer aircraft purchase agreements that reduce the financing or other obligations of Continental, provided that the amendment does not increase Airlines’ obligations under these agreements.  We are also prohibited, without Continental’s consent, from amending our power-by-the-hour agreement with Rolls Royce Corporation (“Rolls Royce”) in any manner that adversely affects Continental’s or our engine maintenance costs for the aircraft subject to the Continental CPA. 

            Indemnification.  In general, we have agreed to indemnify Continental and it has agreed to indemnify us for any damages caused by any breach of our respective obligations under the Continental CPA or caused by our respective actions or inactions under the agreement.

            Other Agreements with Continental.  Prior to 2007, under an administrative services agreement, Continental provided us with services such as information technology support, transaction processing, insurance and risk management, treasury administrative services, corporate real estate and environmental affairs.  In 2007, Continental stopped providing these services and, as a result, we transitioned most information technology support, general ledger, accounts payable, payroll, and treasury administrative services from them to begin performing them independently.  Airlines also has a fuel purchasing agreement with Continental, under which Continental manages all of Airlines’ fuel purchasing requirements under the Continental CPA.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental no longer charges us for these services.  Currently, our administrative services agreement with Continental is limited to technology associated with the Continental infrastructure, minimal HR support related to some employee travel benefits and real estate services as necessary to support our Continental Express flying. 

            In addition, we have a tax agreement with Continental that provides, among other things, for our payment of all or a significant portion of the tax benefits we realize as a result of an internal reorganization performed before our initial public offering in 2002.  Since our initial public offering, we have made net payments of approximately $122.5 million to Continental under the tax agreement and could pay Continental as much as an additional $234.6 million through 2017.  See Item 8.  "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 10 – Income Taxes" for a detailed discussion of our income taxes and our tax agreement with Continental.

            Contract Flying – Delta CPA

            During 2008, we averaged over 35 daily departures and offered scheduled passenger service to over 20 destinations in North America.  We generated $43.8 million of revenue from January through August 2008.

            The Delta CPA was scheduled to end on the second anniversary of each aircraft’s in-service date (June 2009); however, Delta and ExpressJet mutually agreed in July 2008 to terminate this agreement effective September 2, 2008.  Delta agreed to compensate us in August 2008 for costs incurred as a result of the early termination.  On October 2, 2008, we transitioned the 10 aircraft previously operating within the Delta CPA back to our continuing operations.

Contract Flying – Corporate Aviation

We expanded our Corporate Aviation division to 30 aircraft in 2008.  These aircraft are now dedicated to existing and new long-term agreements and ad-hoc charter service arrangements.  Our Corporate Aviation division continues to focus on corporate shuttles, entertainment / sports, and government businesses.  As of December 31, 2008, our Corporate Aviation division has contracted with seven customers with long-term agreements spanning the next 12 months.  Certain Corporate Aviation customers typically prepay deposits for flights based on a percentage of estimated charges to be incurred.  These prepayments are held in escrow and recorded as restricted cash and deferred revenue until the flights are completed.  At that time we recognize the associated revenue and release the funds from escrow into our cash account.

            Corporate Aviation’s goal is to provide group travelers a comfortable, cost-effective and fully customizable travel experience that is unmatched by our competitors.  Additionally, our objective is to make jet charter the ultimate and most satisfying solution to getting people where they need to be.  We are providing such travel solutions to corporations, including other air carriers from time to time, collegiate athletic departments, sports franchises, government entities, hospitality companies and others.  Our pricing structure is based on a contracted fee plus reconciliation payments for uncontrollable costs (including items such as fuel and deicing) for the full amount from which actual costs differ from estimates.

            The aircraft are flown under Airlines’ operating certificate issued by the FAA. 

            We understand that every group travel situation is different.  Therefore, we have reconfigured our aircraft and are currently offering two different seat-configurations on our Corporate Aviation division fleet. 

•  Our 41-seat passenger jet provides additional space for the customer.  The seats in this configuration provide a 38-inch pitch, which is equivalent to a first class seat in a Boeing 737-800.

•  Our 50-seat passenger jet allows for larger groups, which helps maximize travel efficiency.

            All of our seats are leather, memory foam cushioned seats and include XM Satellite Radio with over 100 channels of audio entertainment.  In addition to our basic amenities (such as providing blankets to each passenger and standard catering) customized flight service options give customers an opportunity to create a unique flight experience. 

            We generated $39.8 million in revenue as of December 31, 2008, and anticipate that revenues will continue to grow in this division as we continue to establish long-term relationships which should result in greater predictability in this operation.

            Branded Flying

            ExpressJet Brand & Delta Prorate.  Our year ended December 31, 2008 was one of transition.  During the year we dramatically reshaped our business in order to adapt to the unprecedented high fuel costs and other challenges facing the industry.  As part of the transition, we suspended our Branded Flying operations.  Furthermore, we mutually agreed with Delta to terminate the Delta Prorate effective September 2, 2008.  In connection with these capacity reductions and the transition of 39 aircraft back to Continental, we incurred total special charges of $22.4 million, including aircraft ($2.1 million), employee reductions ($19.2 million) and certain other charges ($1.1 million).  These amounts were offset by $18 million related to terminations payments and adjustments to our air traffic liability due to the cessation of Branded Flying.

            Aviation Services

            Aviation Services includes our ground-handling services pursuant to our contracts with Continental and other airlines at airport locations across the United States, as well as Services.  We will continue to leverage our operational expertise developed from this business segment to cost-effectively serve our current customers and attract new customers.

            Our 2009 Outlook

            General

            Many factors could materially affect our results of operations; 2009 will be a challenging year for us.  Among the most significant factors outside our control are economic conditions, possible industry consolidation and further capacity cuts from major network carriers. 

            The U.S. economy is in a recession.  The airline industry is highly cyclical, and the growth in demand for air travel is correlated to the growth in the U.S. and global economies.  A prolonged economic recession and further capacity cuts from network carriers could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

            In 2009, our focus is primarily on factors within our control, including:

•  controlling our internal costs, such as crew, wages and outside services costs;

•  managing our working capital through partnering with our suppliers and pursuing receivable collections diligently;

•  managing our existing charter customers and promoting additional services;

•  negotiating additional longer-term contracts for our corporate charters; and

•  continuing to deliver consistent and reliable services in our capacity flying with Continental.

            Absent a combination of adverse factors outside of our control, such as a significant further deterioration of the U.S. economy, Continental’s inability to pay us pursuant to the terms of the existing capacity purchase agreement, or industry consolidation, which could result in the formation of one or more airlines with greater financial resources than ours to compete more aggressively in the markets we operate, we expect to breakeven or have slight positive cash contribution from our operations in 2009.  We continue to seek to stimulate demand for our charter flying with corporations, entertainment entities, casinos and other frequent group travelers.

            As of December 31, 2008, our available liquidity, including restricted and unrestricted cash, and our ARS, was $119.4 million.  In early 2008, we invested approximately $65 million in ARS which are primarily backed by student loans that are guaranteed by the U.S. government and have AAA long-term ratings from Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s.  The fair value of our ARS was $41.4 million as of December 31, 2008.  For a detailed list of our current ARS, please see Exhibit 10.14.  The securities are held at Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Banc of America Securities, LLC and Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets.  While the contractual maturities of the underlying securities within these ARS fall primarily in years maturing after 2030, each security has a reset period of either seven or 28 days.  Beginning February 11, 2008, auctions for these securities were not successful, resulting in our continuing to hold them and the issuers paying interest.  Additionally, during the fourth quarter 2008, two of our ARS holdings were sold at nominal discounted rates, resulting in approximately $9.9 million being reclassified as unrestricted cash. 

            Subsequent to year-end, we monetized $4.2 million of our ARS holdings for 87.5% of the securities face value.  We continue to monitor the ARS market and will aggressively pursue monetizing the assets at or near face value through additional market transactions and recently initiated litigation against Royal Bank of Canada related to such investments brokered by the firm.

            We believe that our existing liquidity, projected 2009 cash flows, including the incremental sources of liquidity described above, if needed, will be sufficient to fund current operations and our financial obligations through the year ending December 31, 2009.  However, as noted above, factors outside our control may dictate that we alter our current plans and expectations.

            Future Costs

            We remain committed to providing competitively priced services by controlling our costs; however, we believe that our costs are likely to increase in the future due to:

•  changes in wages, salaries and related fringe benefit costs, including changes to our self-insured medical and workers compensation costs;

•  aging of our fleet, resulting in higher aircraft maintenance costs;

•  changes in the costs of materials and outside services, including our information technology costs;

•  changes in governmental regulations, insurance and taxes affecting air transportation and the costs charged for airport access, including new security requirements; and

•  financing costs in order to satisfy any operating and/or financial obligations.

            In the long term, failure to control our costs would prevent us from remaining competitive and reduce our ability to limit losses including the opportunities to attract additional corporate customers or to survive a prolonged economic downturn.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

            Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect reported amounts and related disclosures.  We have identified the accounting policies and estimates below as critical to our business operations and understanding of our results of operations.  The SEC has defined critical accounting policies and estimates as the ones that are most important to the presentation of a Company’s financial condition and results and require the Company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain.  For all of these estimates, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and the best estimates routinely require judgment.  The discussion below is not intended to be a comprehensive list of our accounting estimates and policies.  For a detailed discussion on the application of our accounting policies, see Item 8.  “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 1.”

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions
Revenue Recognition Contract Revenues.  We recognize our operating revenue under contractual arrangements, such as the Continental CPA and Delta CPA, pursuant to the terms of the contracts.  Operating revenues from these contracts have been classified as passenger revenue.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, we derive our revenue based on fixed block hour rates multiplied by the block hours flown for the period thereby reducing or eliminating the risk of misinterpretation of the agreement.	Contract Revenues.  We recognize as revenue compensation received from Continental for reimbursement of our fixed costs as such amounts are deemed non-refundable, nor subject to credit risk.	Contract Revenues.  Related to the Amended Continental CPA, we also entered into a settlement agreement with Continental to release the parties’ claims at the time of the agreement to amend the then existing capacity purchase agreement, relating to certain identified payments under such capacity purchase agreement, including disputes previously disclosed as possible matters for arbitration.   As such, the revenue recognized under the Continental CPA through June 30, 2008 is not subject to dispute.
Spare Parts and Supplies Inventories, expendable parts and supplies relating to flight equipment are carried at average acquisition cost and are expensed when used.  Inventories are carried at the lower of amortized cost or net realizable value.  The adequacy of our allowance for obsolescence requires a high degree of judgment.	Our allowance for obsolescence related to inventory is provided over the remaining useful life of the related aircraft, plus allowance for spare parts currently identified as excess.  Part of the calculation for this reserve is based on historical experience.  In addition, we may reserve for additional obsolescence when current available market data indicate a decline in the fair value of parts or if we deem parts as excess inventory.	As of December 31, 2008, our allowance for obsolescence related to our spare parts and supplies was approximately $12.9 million.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142–“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), intangible assets can have either finite or indefinite useful lives.  Our critical accounting estimate is related to our “Reorganization Value in Excess of Amounts Allocable to Identifiable Assets,” which has indefinite useful life.  Under SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should be tested at least annually for impairment.  Factors considered important when determining the impairment of reporting segments under SFAS 142 include items affecting the cash flows of the reporting segments; the reporting segments’ operational performance versus market expectations; the reporting segments’ performance compared to peers within the industry; the marketplace for and identification of the intangible asset of the reporting segments; significant changes in the underlying business strategy or operational environment; material ongoing industry or economic trends; or other factors specific to the asset or reporting segments being evaluated.  Any changes in the key assumptions about the business and its prospects, or changes in market conditions or other externalities could result in an impairment charge.

For our SFAS 142 analysis, we have identified that our “Reorganization Value in Excess of Amounts Allocable to Identifiable Assets” is associated with our Contract flying business segment.  Additionally, we employed a discounted cash flow approach, a market multiple approach and an acquisition approach for Contract flying.  The discounted cash flow approach considers our expected cash generation capabilities, and the market–multiple approach and the acquisition approach analyzes similar companies or transactions within the industry to derive multiples for the Company.

Reorganization Value in Excess of Amounts Allocable to Identifiable Assets is allocated to our Contract flying segment.  Due to the changed economics associated with the Amended Continental CPA, we performed an impairment analysis under SFAS 142 in 2008 and concluded that the Reorganization Value in Excess of Amounts Allocable to Identifiable Assets was fully impaired and we recorded a non-cash charge of $12.8 million.  The impairment charge is reflected in the line “Impairment of fixed assets and goodwill” on our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Fair Value Measurements Cash and Short-term Investments. Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) provides a consistent definition of fair value which focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market based inputs over entity-specific inputs.  SFAS 157 also establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.  As of December 31, 2008 we held cash equivalents and short-term investments in ARS that were required to be measured at fair value.  We determine the fair value of our cash equivalents using a market approach.  The market approach used prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical assets.  We determine fair value for our ARS based on inputs which are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement such as the timing of expected future cash flows, underlying collateralization, creditworthiness of the counterparties, and a discount rate that accounts for relevant market conditions.	Cash and Short-term Investments. Currently, there is not an active market for our ARS, accordingly; we determine fair value using a discounted cash flow model. Our model contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate discount rates, anticipated maturity, industry and economic factors and other key metrics.	Cash and Short-term Investments. In February 2008, we invested $65 million in ARS which are classified as available-for-sale securities and are held at fair value.  In accordance with SFAS 157, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $13.7 million. A 10% change in our impairment assessment would have decreased net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 by $1.4 million.  We consistently applied the fair value approach to our ARS throughout 2008 and recorded $0.5 million in net unrealized loss to other comprehensive income.
Convertible Secured Notes.  Our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 were recorded at fair value at the date of issuance in accordance with EITF 96-19, “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments”  as the expected cash flows of the new instrument were 10% greater than the cash flows of our 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023.	Convertible Secured Notes.  We determine fair value using quoted market prices for identical assets in a market that has limited trading and is stressed due to the current credit crisis.	Convertible Secured Notes.  In 2008, we amended the indenture governing the Convertible Secured Notes which triggered us to record a gain from debt discount of $27.8 million that will be amortized over the life of the new instrument up to the first date at which we may be required to repurchase the notes in August 2011, resulting in a decrease to non-operating income.

Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in other entities and flight and ground equipment assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  When evaluating long-lived assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying value of the asset’s estimated future undiscounted cash flows.  If the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss.  The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated fair value.  We recognize an impairment loss if the amount of the asset’s carrying value exceeds the asset’s estimated fair value.  If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new cost basis and, if applicable, will be depreciated over the remaining useful life of that asset.	Long-Lived Assets   Our impairment loss calculations contain uncertainties as they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values.	Long-Lived Assets   We have consistently applied our impairment loss methodology during the past three fiscal years.   As a result of our impairment tests in 2008 we recorded impairment charges of $15.8 million to write the long-lived assets to their estimated fair values.  The assets impaired were determined to have no value so no portion of the impairment charge will result in future cash expenditures.
Income Taxes We record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when we conclude it is more likely than not that we will be unable to generate adequate taxable income of the appropriate character, to utilize such assets.  The tender offer and partial redemption in August 2008 of the 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 caused us to trigger a change in ownership limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code in August 2008.  Due to the decrease in our market capitalization, the Section 382 change triggered in August 2008 resulted in our conclusion that it was more likely than not that we would not be able to utilize our deferred tax assets due to this limitation and therefore we recorded an increase of $19.3 million to the valuation allowance.	Income Taxes This determination requires management to make judgments regarding expectations of future taxable income.  The Section 382 limitation may impact payments due or refundable under the tax agreement with Continental because the certain deductions that are limited under Section 382 are the same tax attributes that drive our payment obligations under the tax agreement.	Income Taxes If amounts are deemed recoverable under the tax agreement, then an adjustment may be required to reduce our valuation allowance.

            In addition to our critical accounting estimates and policies described above, we made other estimates that, while not involving the same degree of judgment, are important to understanding our financial statements.  In general, we base our estimates on historical experience, information from third-party professionals and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances.  We continually evaluate our accounting policies and the estimates used to prepare our consolidated financial statements.  Our estimates as of the date of the financial statements reflect our best judgment after giving consideration to all currently available facts and circumstances.  As such, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates and may require adjustment in the future as additional facts become known or as circumstances change.

            We have discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and the Committee has reviewed the disclosures presented above.

            Recently Issued Accounting Standards

            In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) affirmed the consensus of FASB Staff Position APB 14-1 (FSP APB 14-1), “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”, which applies to all convertible debt instruments that have a ‘‘net settlement feature’’, which means that such convertible debt instruments, by their terms, may be settled either wholly or partially in cash upon conversion. FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly or partially in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner reflective of the issuers’ nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is not permitted and retroactive application to all periods presented is required.  The adoption of FSP APB 14-1 will affect the historical accounting for our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes and our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.  We are continuing to evaluate the impact of this standard to our results of operations and financial position however; we expect that the ultimate application of FSP APB 14-1 will result in an increase in interest expense for the years presented.  In addition, the company is evaluating the impact this standard will have on our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.

Operations Review

            Under the terms of the Amended Continental CPA, we are not reimbursed for certain costs, primarily fuel, aircraft rent and certain ground handling services, which were previously recorded as revenue.  Accordingly revenues from July 1, 2008 forward under our contract flying with Continental are different than prior to the Amended Continental CPA.  Additionally in September 2008, we ceased our Branded Flying which began in April 2007.  Accordingly, results between 2008 and 2007 are not comparable.     

            Selected Financial Information

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008		Increase/ (Decrease) 2008-2007			2007		Increase/ (Decrease) 2007-2006			2006
		(In thousands, except per share data and increase/decrease %’s)
Statement of Operations Data:
Operating revenue	$	1,318,213		(21.8	%)	$	1,685,545		0.2	%	$	1,682,156
Operating expenses		1,434,668		(20.0	%)		1,792,416		16.3	%		1,541,085
Operating income (loss)		(116,455	)	9.0	%		(106,871	)	n/m			141,071
Nonoperating income (expense), net		23,663		n/m			(1	)	n/m			5,385
Net Income (loss)		(88,195	)	25.5	%		(70,248	)	n/m			92,565
Basic earnings (loss) per share		(7.83	)	(40.1	%)		(13.08	)	n/m			17.18
Diluted earnings (loss) per share		(7.83	)	(40.1	%)		(13.08	)	n/m			15.64

            Statistical Information

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008		Increase/ (Decrease) 2008-2007		2007		Increase/ (Decrease) 2007-2006		2006
Operating Statistics:
Revenue passenger miles (millions) (1)	9,564		(5.0	%)	10,071		(2.2	%)	10,297
Available seat miles (millions) (2)	12,606		(7.1	%)	13,575		2.8	%	13,200
Passenger load factor (3)	75.9	%	1.7	pts	74.2	%	(3.8	pts)	78.0	%
Operating cost per available seat mile (cents) (4)	11.38		(13.8	%)	13.20		13.1	%	11.67
Block hours (5)	828,840		(9.6	%)	916,756		n/m		916,718
Operating cost per block hour (dollars) (6)	1,731		(11.5	%)	1,956		16.4	%	1,681
Departures	433,289		(11.5	%)	489,489		(0.4	%)	491,598
Average price per gallon of fuel, including fuel   taxes (cents) (7)	132.00		32.0	%	100.00		40.4	%	71.20
Fuel gallons consumed (millions)	172.9		(46.5	%)	323.2		1.3	%	319.1
Average length of aircraft flight (miles)	594		4.4	%	569		3.6	%	549
Average daily utilization of each aircraft (hours) (8)	8.50		(7.3	%)	9.17		(0.8	%)	9.24
Completion factor	97.4	%	(0.2	pts)	97.6	%	(0.3	pts)	97.9	%
Revenue passengers (thousands)	15,629		(10.0	%)	17,365		(4.4	%)	18,173
Actual aircraft in fleet at end of period	244		(10.9	%)	274		0.0	%	274

(1)	Revenue passenger miles are the number of scheduled miles flown by revenue passengers.
(2)	Available seat miles are the number of passenger seats available multiplied by the number of scheduled miles those seats are flown.
(3)	Passenger load factor equals revenue passenger miles divided by available seat miles.
(4)	Operating cost per available seat mile is operating costs divided by available seat miles.  The reimbursable expenses are different under the terms of the Amended Continental CPA versus the Original Continental CPA, and therefore costs are inconsistent with prior periods, beginning July 2008.
(5)	Block hours are the hours from gate departure to gate arrival.
(6)	Operating cost per block hour is operating costs divided by block hours.
(7)	Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for the cost of providing fuel for all flights and, therefore, effective July 1, 2008, fuel expense is no longer included in our statements of operations for our Continental Express flying.  Prior to July 1, 2008 fuel cost used in calculations includes cost of fuel and related fuel tax.  Airlines incurred fuel expense and fuel tax equal to the lower of the actual cost or the agreed-upon caps of 66.0 cents and 5.2 cents per gallon, respectively, based on our fuel purchase agreement with Continental.  In 2007, our fuel activity included purchases to support our various business platforms outside of the Continental CPA.  These purchases were executed through an agreement with an independent third party at an average price per gallon of $2.43, which represents 16.7% of our total fuel consumption for 2007.
(8)	Average daily utilization of each aircraft is the average number of block hours per day that an aircraft is operated.

            We monitor the statistical information above closely to ensure that we are continually focused on our operational efficiencies and cost control.

            The following discussion provides an analysis of our results of operations and reasons for any material changes for the periods indicated.

            Comparison of 2008 to 2007

            Operating Revenue and Segment Profit / (Loss)

            The table below (in millions, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, direct segment costs and segment profit (loss) from 2008 to 2007.  Before 2007 we did not have any segments that were deemed material.  As such, revenues and costs are shown in Contract Flying only.  A significant portion of our operating expenses and infrastructure is integrated across segments (e.g., for maintenance, non-airport facility rentals, outside services, general and administrative expenses) in order to support our entire fleet of 244 aircraft; therefore, we do not allocate these costs to the individual segments identified above, but evaluate them for our consolidated operation.  We believe that the presentation of our consolidated shared costs and transition costs is consistent with the manner in which these expenses are reviewed by our chief operating decision makers.  These costs are included as a part of the analysis of our operating expenses below. 

		Fiscal Year
		2008		% Total Revenue			2007		% Total Revenue			Increase/ (Decrease)		Change %
Revenue from customers:
Contract Flying	$	1,059.3		80.4	%	$	1,471.5		87.3	%	$	(412.2	)	(28.0	)
Branded Flying		222.0		16.8			180.5		10.7			41.5		23.0
Aviation Services		43.8		3.3			41.0		2.4			2.8		6.8
Eliminations		(6.9	)	(0.5	)		(7.5	)	(0.4	)		0.6		8.0
Total revenue from customers		1,318.2		100.0			1,685.5		100.0			(367.3	)	(21.8	)
Direct segment costs:
Contract Flying		792.6		60.1			1,128.5		67.0			(335.9	)	(29.8	)
Branded Flying		289.9		22.0			295.1		17.5			(5.2	)	(1.8	)
Aviation Services		23.8		1.8			25.4		1.4			(1.6	)	(6.3	)
Eliminations		(6.9	)	(0.5	)		(7.5	)	(0.4	)		0.6		8.0
Total direct segment costs		1,099.4		83.4			1,441.5		85.5			(342.1	)	(23.7	)
Segment profit / (loss)		218.8		16.6			244.0		14.5			(25.2	)	(10.3	)
Special charges (1)		(43.2	)				—
Other shared expenses, including     transition costs		(292.1	)				(350.9	)
Gain from debt discount		27.8					—
Settlement of fuel contracts (2)		23.1					—
Impairment charge on investments		(21.5	)				(7.0	)
Amortization of debt discount		(3.6	)				—
Interest expense		(9.1	)				(8.5	)
Interest income		6.6					17.1
Other income (loss)		0.4					(1.6	)
Consolidated income (loss) before     income taxes		(92.8	)				(106.9	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		4.6					36.6
Net Loss		(88.2	)				(70.3	)

(1)	The $43.2 million in special charges consists of $29.7 million and $13.5 million related to suspension of our Branded Flying and Contract Flying segments, respectively.
(2)	The $23.1 million received for settlement of fuel contracts relates to the Branded Flying segment.

            The table below (in millions, except percentage data) sets forth the segment profit (loss) in 2008 and 2007 for each segment.

		Contract Flying			Branded Flying					Aviation Services
		2008	Total Revenue %		2008		Total Revenue %			2008	Total Revenue %
Revenue from customers:	$	1,059.3	100.0	$	222.0		100.0		$	43.8	100.0
Direct segment costs:		792.6	74.8		289.9		130.6			23.8	54.4
Segment profit / (loss)		266.7	25.2		(67.9	)	(30.6	)		20.0	45.6

		Contract Flying			Branded Flying				Aviation Services
		2007	Total Revenue %		2007		Total Revenue %		2007	Total Revenue %
Revenue from customers:	$	1,471.5	100.0	$	180.5		100.0	$	41.0	100.0
Direct segment costs:		1,128.5	76.7		295.1		n/m		25.4	62.0
Segment profit / (loss)		343.0	23.3		(114.6	)	n/m		15.6	38.0

            Contract Flying.   The decrease in operating revenue and expenses within our Contract Flying segment is primarily due to new terms under the Amended Continental CPA which became effective July 1, 2008.  Prior to July 1, 2008, Airlines was entitled to receive payment for each block hour that Continental scheduled it to fly and was based on a formula designed to provide Airlines with a target operating margin of 10%.  The Amended agreement provides payments to us at a pre-determined rate based on block hours flown that are considerably lower than the rates under the original agreement.  Likewise, under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for the cost of providing fuel for all flights and for paying aircraft rent for all aircraft covered by the Amended Continental CPA and, therefore, these items are not included in our statements of operations for the quarter-ended September 30, 2008 and thereafter.  In addition, Delta and ExpressJet mutually agreed in July 2008 to terminate their CPA effective September 2, 2008.

Branded Flying. We began Branded Flying on April 2, 2007 and ended operations September 2, 2008.  In July 2008, we announced we would suspend flying under the ExpressJet brand and Delta Prorate agreement effective September 2008 due to record high fuel prices that made the Branded Flying operations impossible to sustain.  We were not profitable in this operation in 2008 or 2007.  Revenues from this flying were approximately 17% of our total operating revenue for 2008 and slightly less than 11% of our total operating revenue for 2007.  Average load factor within this segment was 69.1% in 2008 versus 55.7% in 2007.  In spite of seeing improvements in operations in 2008 over 2007, unprecedented high fuel costs continued to be the driving force in determining Branded Flying’s profitability and as such we chose to suspend the operations.  We recognized $18 million in revenue as a result of the suspension of operations due to adjustments to our air traffic liability, frequent flier plan and certain termination payments.

            Aviation Services.   In 2008, Aviation Services had a segment profit margin of 45.6%, up from 38% in 2007.  This increase is due primarily to additional ground handling contracts secured at more favorable rates than in 2007.

            Operating Expenses

            The table below (in million, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expenses from 2008 to 2007.

		Fiscal Year
		2008	Total Revenue %		2007	Total Revenue %		Increase / (Decrease)		Change %
Wages, salaries, and related costs	$	397.5	30.2	$	437.6	26.0	$	(40.1	)	(9.2	)
Aircraft fuel and related taxes		228.0	17.3		323.2	19.2		(95.2	)	(29.5	)
Aircraft rentals		197.1	15.0		344.2	20.4		(147.1	)	(42.7	)
Maintenance, materials and repairs		197.4	15.0		202.5	12.0		(5.1	)	(2.5	)
Other rentals and landing fees		96.2	7.3		119.2	7.1		(23.0	)	(19.3	)
Ground handling		59.6	4.5		97.2	5.8		(37.6	)	(38.7	)
Outside services		48.6	3.7		58.3	3.5		(9.7	)	(16.6	)
Marketing and distribution		25.7	1.9		31.4	1.9		(5.7	)	(18.2	)
Depreciation and amortization		33.4	2.5		30.0	1.8		3.4		11.3
Impairment of fixed assets and   goodwill		20.8	1.6		—	—		20.8		n/m
Special charges		22.4	1.7		—	—		22.4		n/m
Other operating expenses		108.0	8.2		148.8	8.8		(40.8	)	(27.4	)
Total Operating Expenses		1,434.7	n/m		1,792.4	n/m		(357.7	)	(20.0	)

            Wages, salaries & related costs decreased 9.2% from 2007 to 2008 primarily due to head count reduction in our work force related to the suspension of Branded Flying operations.  Additionally certain wage concessions were agreed to in 2008 under some of Airlines’ collective bargaining agreements and bonus plans were trimmed for 2008 due to our continuing losses.

            In the future, we anticipate that our wages, salaries and related costs may be affected by the following factors:

•  wage increases to incentivize key personnel to remain with us as we continue to stabilize our Company;

•  wage rate increases in accordance with our collective bargaining agreements as a result of higher seniority of our work force; and

•  projected increases in health and medical benefit costs.

            Aircraft fuel and related taxes decreased 29.5% primarily due to new terms under the Amended Continental CPA which became effective July 1, 2008.  Prior to July 1, 2008, our fuel price, including related fuel taxes, was capped at 71.20 cents per gallon under the original Continental CPA.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for the cost of providing fuel for all aircraft covered by the Amended Continental CPA and, therefore, the related expense is no longer included in our statements of operations.

            Aircraft rentals  decreased 42.7% primarily due to new terms under the Amended Continental CPA which became effective July 1, 2008.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for paying aircraft rent for all aircraft under that arrangement and, therefore, the related expense is no longer included in our statements of operations.  In addition, lease payments for the 30 aircraft operating outside of the Amended Continental CPA are contracted at significantly lower rates than previous years.

            Other rentals and landing fees decreased 19.3% from 2007 to 2008.  Airport facilities and landing fees expense was down due to decrease in contract flying in 2008 and changes due to new CAL CPA effective July 1, 2008.  Outside simulator rent was significantly higher in 2007 due to the start-up of the new lines of business and the need to train additional staff.

            Ground Handling decreased 38.7% primarily due to new terms under the Amended Continental CPA which became effective July 1, 2008.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for ground handling for all Continental managed stations.  In addition, under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for the cost of providing fueling services for all aircraft covered by the Amended Continental CPA and, therefore, the related ground handling and aircraft servicing expense is no longer included in our statements of operations.

            Outside services decreased 16.6% from 2007 to 2008 primarily due to a decrease in expenses incurred to support our diversification strategy in 2007 and a reduction of approximately 50% in CAL admin fees earned in 2008.  This fee was cancelled in the Amended Continental CPA.

            Marketing and distribution decreased 18.2% primarily due to the suspension of flying under our ExpressJet brand and Delta pro-rate arrangement effective September 2, 2008.  All marketing and distribution cost for aircraft operating within the Continental CPA is incurred by Continental.

            Depreciation and amortization  increased 11.3% from 2007 to 2008.  This increase is primarily due to the full year impact of capital additions and improvements incurred in prior years as we ramped up for new operations.  The increase was partially offset by the reduced depreciation associated with our suspension of Branded Flying as we impaired $8 million of capital assets used to support these operations,

            Impairment charges on fixed assets and goodwill increased $20.8 million primarily due to a $12.8 million non-cash impairment of goodwill related to the Continental CPA, and a $8.0 million non-cash impairment to write-off certain capital assets, primarily non-moveable equipment, building and aircraft improvements.  Similar impairment charges did not occur in 2007.

            Special charges increased $22.4 million primarily due to the suspension of flying under our branded commercial passenger flight operations and our capacity purchase and pro-rate agreements with Delta Airlines in September 2008.  In connection with these capacity reductions and the transition of up to 39 aircraft back to Continental, we incurred special charges of $21.7 million related to aircraft, employee reductions and certain other charges in addition to a $0.7 million non-cash charge related to previously disputed base closure costs associated with the original Continental CPA.  Similar impairment charges did not occur in 2007.

            Other operating expenses decreased by 27.4% in 2008 as compared to 2007 primarily due to the suspension of operations announced July 2008 for certain business lines.  Employee related expenses such as per diem, travel & relocation, and hotels declined in relation to the reduction in employee head count.  Passenger services and catering related expenses declined as the suspended business operations wound down.

            Non-Operating Expenses

            The table below (in millions, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in non-operating expenses from 2008 to 2007.

		Fiscal Year
	2008			Total Revenue %			2007		Total Revenue %		Increase / (Decrease)		Change %
Gain from debt discount	27.8			2.1		$	—		—		27.8		n/m
Settlement of fuel contracts	23.1			1.8			—		—		23.1		n/m
Impairment charge on investments	(21.5		)	(1.6	)		(7.0	)	(0.4	)	(14.5	)	n/m
Amortization of debt discount	(3.6		)	(0.3	)		—		—		(3.6	)	n/m
Interest expense	(9.1		)	(0.7	)		(8.5	)	(0.5	)	(0.6	)	7.1
Interest income	5.8			0.4			15.7		0.9		(9.9	)	(63.1	)
Capitalized interest	0.8			0.1			1.3		0.1		(0.5	)	(38.5	)
Equity investment loss	(1.3		)	(0.1	)		(1.3	)	(0.1	)	—		n/m
Other, net	1.7			0.1			(0.3	)	—		2.0		n/m
Total Non-Operating Expenses	23.7			1.8			(0.1	)	n/m		23.8		n/m

            Gain from debt discount was $27.8 million as we recorded, in accordance with EITF 96-19 “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments,” our $68.5 million 11.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 to a fair value of $40.7 million, net of a debt discount that was recorded as a non-recurring gain under non-operating income for 2008.

            Settlement of fuel contracts $23.1 million as we recorded the sale of our fixed forward purchase contracts for periods subsequent to September 2, 2008.

            Impairment charge on investments was $21.5 million for 2008 as compared to $7.0 million for 2007.  A $13.7 million impairment was recorded on our ARS investment in 2008.  The need to record an other-than-temporary decline in valuation was caused by the uncertainty in the ARS market and the fact we may need to liquidate these investments before it recovers. Impairments on our equity investments of $7.8 million and $7.0 million were recognized during 2008 and 2007, respectively.  We review our investments in unconsolidated affiliates for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be fully recoverable. See Item 8  “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” – Note 1 - “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for further information on our ARS and Note 6 – “Investments in Other Entities” for further discussion of the equity impairments.

            Amortization of debt discount  represents amortization of the fair value adjustment of $27.8 million recorded as a gain that will be recognized to non-operating income until August 2011, the next put date of our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.

            Interest income decreased primarily due to the volume of cash invested as well as decreases in the rate of interest earned.

Comparison of 2007 to 2006

            Operating Revenue and Segment Profit / (Loss)

            The table below (in millions, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, direct segment costs and segment profit (loss) from 2007 to 2006.  Before 2007 we did not have any segments that were deemed material.  As such, revenues and costs are shown in Contract Flying only.  A significant portion of our operating expenses and infrastructure is integrated across segments (e.g., for maintenance, non-airport facility rentals, outside services, general and administrative expenses) in order to support our entire fleet of 274 aircraft; therefore, we do not allocate these costs to the individual segments identified above, but evaluate them for our consolidated operation.  Additionally, due to the transition of our 69 aircraft released from the Continental CPA in 2007, we incurred approximately $13.6 million in transition expenses associated with painting, maintenance modifications and training to ready our operation for flying outside of the Continental CPA.  These costs were not included in our measurement of segment profitability as they are expected to be nonrecurring.  We believe that the presentation of our consolidated shared costs and transition costs is consistent with the manner in which these expenses are reviewed by our chief operating decision makers.  These costs are included as a part of the analysis of our operating expenses below. 

		Fiscal Year
		2007		Total Revenue %			2006		Total Revenue %			Increase/ (Decrease)		Change %
Revenue from customers:
Contract Flying	$	1,471.5		87.3		$	1,686.4		100.2		$	(214.9	)	(12.7	)
Branded Flying		180.5		10.7			—		—			180.5		n/m
Aviation Services		41.0		2.4			—		—			41.0		n/m
Eliminations		(7.5	)	(0.4	)		(4.2	)	(0.2	)		(3.3	)	78.6
Total Revenue from customers		1,685.5		100.0			1,682.2		100.0			3.3		0.2
Direct segment costs:
Contract Flying		1,128.5		67.0			1,245.0		74.0			(116.5	)	(9.4	)
Branded Flying		295.1		17.5			—		—			295.1		n/m
Aviation Services		25.4		1.4			—		—			25.4		n/m
Eliminations		(7.5	)	(0.4	)		(4.2	)	(0.2	)		(3.3	)	78.6
Total Direct segment costs		1,441.5		85.5			1,240.8		73.8			200.7		16.2
Segment profit / (loss)		244.0		14.5			441.4		26.2			(197.4	)	(44.7	)
Shared expenses, including     transition costs		(350.9	)				(300.3	)
Interest expense		(8.5	)				(7.3	)
Interest income		17.1					15.0
Other		(8.6	)				(2.3	)
Consolidated income/loss before     income taxes		(106.9	)				146.5

            The table below (in millions, except percentage data) sets forth the segment profit (loss) in 2007 for each segment. Before 2007 we did not have segments that were deemed material.  As such, a similar table for 2006 is not presented.

		Contract Flying			Branded Flying				Airport Services
		2007	Total Revenue %		2007		Total Revenue %		2007	Total Revenue %
Revenue from customers:	$	1,471.5	100.0	$	180.5		100.0	$	41.0	100.0
Direct segment costs:		1,128.5	76.7		295.1		n/m		25.4	62.0
Segment profit / (loss)		343.0	23.3		(114.6	)	n/m		15.6	38.0

            Contract Flying.   Our decrease in operating revenue for contract flying is primarily due to the withdrawal of 69 aircraft from the Continental CPA.  This decrease was partially offset by commencing contract flying under the Delta CPA and charter flying in 2007.

            Since a substantial portion of Airlines’ costs under the Continental CPA are reconciled for differences between actual costs and estimated costs included in block hour rates at a 10.0% operating margin (see Item 1. Business – Continental Capacity Purchase and Other Agreements for further discussion of the details related to this cost reconciliation), if Airlines’ prevailing margin (before any reconciliation payments) fell outside its margin band of 8.5% to 10.0% for 2007 and 2006, Airlines’ revenue would have been adjusted to bring it back to its floor or cap.  Reconciliation payments from Continental in 2007 netted $4.2 million to us.  The 2007 reconciliation payment was primarily caused by the lower rates resulting from arbitration with Continental in 2007.  Reconciliation payments to Continental totaled $7.3 million for 2006.  The 2006 reconciliation payment was primarily driven by lower actual wages, salaries and related costs and maintenance, materials and repair expenses as compared to the estimated costs in the agreements block hour rates. 

            On July 27, 2007, the three-member arbitration panel issued its decision relating to the 2007 block hour rates that Continental paid Airlines for regional jet service in 2007.  The panel considered various components related to the proposed rates that we charge Continental in connection with regional jet service, including the costs that formed the basis for our 2007 rate proposal and the allocation of certain costs between the parties.  The panel did not make any changes to the costs included in our 2007 budgeted rates except as those costs related to allocation.  The panel determined that the annual 2007 budgeted rates originally presented by Airlines should be reduced in the aggregate by $14.2 million, which includes the 10% operating margin.  As a result of the panel’s decision, we recorded our passenger revenue pursuant to the terms of the Continental CPA using the block hour rates determined by the panel for the year ended December 31, 2007.

            Branded Flying.  We began Branded Flying on April 2, 2007.  Although passenger revenue from such flying was less than 11% of our total operating revenue for 2007, we believed that our passenger revenue would continue to grow contingent upon our ability to use marketing and promotion programs to shift our traffic mix from heavily leisure travel to more business/corporate travel. 

We were not profitable in this operation in 2007.  Our results of operations were impacted by record high fuel prices, similar to the rest of the airline industry and an average load factor for 2007 being 55.7%.  Therefore for fuel, we implemented a strategy by entering into fixed forward price contracts with our fuel provider using a systematic method for determining the volume and the price for which to enter into the contracts for a rolling 12-month period on a quarterly basis.  Our average load factor primarily resulted from several factors including a lack of brand awareness and a very aggressive redeployment of aircraft to Branded driven by the pace of the aircraft coming out of the Continental CPA.  As outlined above, to increase our load factor we tried to shift our traffic mix from heavily leisure to more business/corporate travel.  Although our fixed forward price fuel contracts partially mitigated our exposure to fuel price fluctuation, fuel continued to be a driving force in determining Branded Flying’s profitability along with our ability to shift our traffic mix from leisure to more business travel.  Additionally, we incurred marketing and distribution costs related to supporting the revenues for this segment.  Under the terms of our contractual flying, these costs were incurred by the major airline with which we contracted.

            Aviation Services.  Aviation Services was included in Contract Flying in 2006 as it was not deemed material for segment reporting purposes.  In 2007, Aviation Services had a segment profit margin of 38.0%.  This segment profit margin and increases in operations for aviation services was related to additional fixed-rate contracts for ground handling which began in 2007.

            Operating Expenses

            The table below (in millions, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expenses from 2007 to 2006.

			Fiscal Year
		2007		Total Revenue %		2006	Total Revenue %		Increase / (Decrease)		Change %
Wages, salaries, and related costs	$	437.6		26.0	$	386.7	23.0	$	50.9		13.2
Aircraft rentals		344.2		20.4		332.4	19.8		11.8		3.5
Aircraft fuel and related taxes		323.2		19.2		227.2	13.5		96.0		42.3
Maintenance, materials and repairs		202.5		12.0		191.4	11.4		11.1		5.8
Ground handling		97.2		5.8		99.9	5.9		(2.7	)	(2.7	)
Other rentals and landing fees		119.2		7.1		115.6	6.9		3.6		3.1
Outside services		58.3		3.5		51.3	3.0		7.0		13.6
Marketing and distribution		31.4		1.9		0.1	0.0		31.3		n/m
Depreciation and amortization		30.0		1.8		25.8	1.5		4.2		16.3
Other operating expenses		148.8		8.8		110.7	6.6		38.1		34.4
Total Operating Expenses		1,792.4		n/m		1,541.1	91.6		251.3		16.3

            Wages, salaries & related costs increased 13.2% from 2006 to 2007 due to our growth in our work force to support changes in our flight operations and our corporate infrastructure and increases in wage rates under some of Airlines’ collective bargaining agreements.  In conjunction with the increases in base wages, we incurred approximately $13.3 million higher employee benefit costs, such as medical coverage, workers’ compensation costs and 401(k) expenses in 2007.

            Aircraft fuel and related taxes increased 42.3% from 2006 to 2007.  This increase was primarily due to the diversification of our operations into other business platforms.  Our fuel price, including related fuel taxes, was capped at 71.20 cents per gallon by the Continental CPA while the average price of our fuel, included related fuel taxes, for our operations outside of the Continental CPA was $2.43 per gallon.

            Outside services increased 13.6% from 2006 to 2007 primarily due to increased weather events resulting in higher deicing expenses and increased expenses to support our diversification strategy.

            Marketing and distribution increased 100.0% to $31.4 million during 2007. This increase resulted from the need to re-brand our Company and diversify our customer base to support and promote our diversification into other lines of business through advertising and promotion, loyalty programs, global distribution systems and reservation call centers. 

            Depreciation and amortization increased 16.3% from 2006 to 2007.  This increase was primarily due to capital additions and improvements necessary to run our new operations. 

            Other operating expenses increased 34.4% from 2006 and 2007 primarily caused by passenger services and catering-related expenses incurred to support our operations outside of the Continental CPA.  Additionally, crew related charges, such as per diem, hotel cost and relocation expenses, increased due to higher rates and increased flight operations partially resulting from our transition activities.

            Non-Operating Expenses

            The table below (in millions, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in non-operating expenses from 2007 to 2006.

		Fiscal Year
		2007		Total Revenue %		2006		Total Revenue %		Increase / (Decrease)	Change %
Interest expense	$	(8.5	)	0.5	$	(7.3	)	0.4	$	1.2	16.4
Interest income		15.7		0.9		14.7		0.9		1.0	6.8
Capitalized interest		1.3		0.1		0.3		—		1.0	n/m
Equity investment loss		(8.3	)	0.5		(2.0	)	0.1		6.3	n/m
Other, net		(0.3	)	—		(0.2	)	—		0.1	(50.0	)

            Interest expense was primarily related to our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes and the EDC Loans.  Interest expense related to these long-term debts increased in 2007 by approximately $1.3 million as a result of increased amortization of the financing fees related to our convertible note.

            Equity Investment losses of $8.3 million and $2.0 million were recognized during 2007 and 2006, respectively.  We review our investments in unconsolidated affiliates for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be fully recoverable.  See Item 8.  “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 6 – Investments in Other Entities” for further discussion of this impairment.  The remaining $1.3 million in 2007 is our proportionate share of the earnings and losses of all equity investments we currently hold.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position

            Sources and Uses of Cash

            For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, our operations used $56.1 million and $39.9 million, respectively, in cash flow.  As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, we also had $20.5 million and $24.8 million of restricted cash, respectively, which is comprised of collateral for our workers’ compensation coverage, customer deposits for future charter flights, letters of credit, and holdbacks required under our credit card processing agreements.

            In 2008 and 2007, we spent $10.3 million and $48.9 million, respectively, on capital expenditures.  A majority of the expenditures for 2008 and 2007 were spent on flight and ground equipment to support the expansion of our operations to new lines of business and building our information technology infrastructure to support these new businesses and the increase in our flight schedules under the Continental CPA.  Of the $10.3 million spent in 2008, approximately $1.9 million was spent on capital expenditures for our strategic business ventures which are outside of the Continental CPA.

            In light of the current economic recession, coupled with the Amended Continental CPA that pays us at lower block hour rates and is currently operating at record low utilization levels, we believe strict budgeting and cash preservation are crucial to sustain our liquidity and meet our financial obligations through 2009.  Our focus on execution of all cost savings initiatives launched in 2008 is essential to generate positive cash flow and preserve our current cash balance.

            Our 2008 cash flows have included the following sources of cash outside of normal operating revenues:

•  $37.8 million tax refund for prior year loss carryback provisions, received in June 2008;

•  $23.1 million non-operating gain from the monetization of fuel fixed forward contracts subsequent to capacity reductions in September 2008 of which approximately $21 million was received in the 3^rd quarter of 2008;

•  $12.5 million in sales of unencumbered assets; and

•  $4.0 million in purchase deposits previously held by our fuel vendor that was refunded in October 2008.

            We believe that our existing liquidity, projected 2009 cash flows, including the incremental sources of liquidity described above, if needed, will be sufficient to fund current operations and our financial obligations through the year ending December 31, 2009.  However, as noted above, factors outside our control may dictate that we alter our current plans and expectations.

            Capital Expenditures

            Our capital expenditures in 2008 related to the following items (in millions):

		2008
Flight Equipment	$	2.8
Ground Equipment		2.6
Technology		4.1
Other		0.8
	$	10.3

            These capital expenditures related primarily to modifications of our planes, station start-up costs, technology needed to support the administrative operations we assumed from Continental in 2007, as well as systems needed for our Branded Flying and other infrastructure costs.  Capital expenditures for 2009 are expected to decrease since we suspended our Branded Flying operations and have fewer additional infrastructure needs.  In 2009, we anticipate spending between $2 million and $5 million in capital expenditures of which approximately $1.5 million relate to the rollover of 2008 capital projects.

            Long-term Debt

            Although we did amend the terms of Original 4.25% Convertible Notes we did not enter into any new financing transactions in 2008.  As of December 31, 2008, long-term debt, including current maturities, totaled $70.2 million (par value), which consisted of the 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 and the EDC Loans. 

            In July 2003, we completed an offering of $137.2 million aggregate principal amount of Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 with interest payable semi-annually.  Holders of this debt had the right to require that we repurchase their notes on August 1, 2008, 2013 and 2018 (“Repurchase Dates”) at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.    Under the indenture governing the convertible notes, we were able to satisfy the obligation with either cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares.  During 2008, we took the following actions after consulting with our independent financial advisors:

•  Received stockholders approval for two proposals that provided us greater flexibility in satisfying our repurchase obligations with respect to the Original 4.25% Convertible Notes, which included the ability to issue such number of shares of our common stock as necessary to repurchase all outstanding convertible notes that were tendered on August 1, 2008, and increased our authorized common stock from 200 million shares to 400 million shares;

•  Commenced our repurchase offer for the Original 4.25% Convertible Notes and provided written notice to the trustee of our intention to pay the repurchase price wholly in shares of our common stock;

•  Unilaterally amended the indenture governing the notes to increase the coupon from 4.25% to 11.25% over the remaining note term, to provide security based on a pro-rata amount of collateral and to provide for an additional repurchase date on August 1, 2011, in order to provide improved terms and additional flexibility for the noteholders; and

•  Issued 16.4 million shares (Reverse Split adjusted) of our common stock in payment of the repurchase price for the $59.7 million principal amount of the notes validly tendered and to settle accrued and unpaid interest due August 1, 2008.  Because the common stock was issued in exchange for the Original 4.25% Convertible Notes exclusively with the existing holders of the notes, and no commission or other compensation was paid in soliciting the exchange, the securities were exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.

            Following the completion of the tender offer in August 2008 for our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023, $68.5 million aggregate principal (prior to $7.6 million subsequently repurchased by us) of our convertible notes remained outstanding.  Additionally, as provided in the amended indenture governing the notes, such notes have become our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.  In accordance with EITF 96-19 “Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments,” we accounted for this exchange as an extinguishment of debt, since the net present value of the cash flows under the exchanged terms was more than 10% of the net present value of the cash flows under the terms of the original instrument.  As required by accounting rules, we recorded the convertible notes to a fair value of $40.7 million, net of a debt discount of $27.8 million that will be amortized over the life of the new instrument up to the first date at which we may be required to repurchase the notes in August 2011.  The required adjustment was recorded as a non-recurring gain under non-operating income for 2008.  The net balance of the 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 as of December 31, 2008 was $39.7 million, net of repurchases made by us.

            We estimated fair value of our convertible notes based on an average of market trading activity for the convertible notes subsequent to the exchange in August 2008.

            Other than the 11.25% Convertible Notes due 2023, we do not have any material long-term borrowings or available lines of credit.  Pursuant to the terms of the amended indenture governing the 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023, we granted a security interest, with a pro-rata portion, (based on the portion that the remaining notes represent of the total convertible notes that were issued) of assets with an appraised value of approximately $181 million, including approximately $96 million in spare parts and $85 million of spare engines.  Based on the principal amount of notes remaining outstanding on August 2, 2008, the pledged collateral for the notes totals approximately $51.5 million in spare parts and $45.3 million in spare engines.  We agreed that we will not as of any fiscal year end permit the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Notes divided by the fair market value of the pledged collateral to be greater than certain percentages outlined in the amended indenture.  If such collateral ratios are greater than the applicable maximum, we will pledge additional spare parts, spare aircraft engines and / or cash and cash equivalents.  Pursuant to the terms of the amended indenture, we are required to deliver a certificate from our appraiser dated not later than 15 business days after January 1 of each year certifying the value as of January 1 or such later date.  We delivered such certificate from our appraiser in January 2009 and the appraised values of $180.4 million have not changed materially from the initial appraisal of $181 million at the amendment date.

            The notes are guaranteed by Airlines.  Except as otherwise specified in the indenture pursuant to which the notes were issued, there are no restrictions on Airlines’ ability to transfer funds to Holdings in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.  General provisions of applicable state law, however, may limit the ability of any subsidiary to pay dividends or make distributions to its parent in certain circumstances. 

            If we elect to use shares of common stock to repurchase any notes on the Repurchase Dates, the number of shares will be equal to the repurchase price divided by 97.5% of the average closing sales price of our common stock for the five consecutive trading days ending on the third business day prior to the applicable Repurchase Date (adjusted to take into account the occurrence of certain events that would require adjustment of the conversion rate).  In certain circumstances, the notes are convertible into our common stock, at a ratio of 54.9451 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which was equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $18.20 per common share; however, following the Reverse Split the ratio is now 5.49451, which is equivalent to a price of approximately $182.00 per share.  The ratio is subject to adjustments if certain events take place, and holders may convert only if the closing sale price per common share exceeds 120% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter.

            The EDC Loans consist of $10.7 million loaned to us in May 2003 and $6.6 million loaned to us in September 2003.  The EDC Loans are secured by certain of our flight simulators, flight data software and other equipment related to the simulators.  We used all the proceeds from the EDC Loans to reduce the principal under a note payable to Continental.  The amount due to EDC accrues interest at the six-month LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum.  Each of the EDC Loans has a term of 96 months and each contains customary representations, warranties and covenants.  Additionally, Continental is the guarantor of the EDC Loans, and a default under the guarantee would cause an acceleration of the loan.  In 2008, we made payments in the amount of $4.2 million on the EDC Loans, of which $3.5 million related to principal.  As of December 31, 2008, the balance of the EDC Loans was $9.3 million.  As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of the EDC Loans was approximately $7.2 million and $12.4 million, respectively. 

            Securities Repurchase Program

            In July 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the expenditure of up to $30 million to repurchase shares of our common stock.  In February 2006, the Board authorized the inclusion of our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes   now our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 within the previously announced $30 million program.  Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Board authorized an additional $15 million for this program.  Purchases have been made from time to time in the open market; the timing of any repurchases under the program depends on a variety of factors, including market conditions, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time.  As of December 31, 2008, we had a balance of $10.1 million remaining within the program for additional purchases.  As discussed In Note 11 – “Earnings / (Loss) Per Share”,stockholders approved to effect a Reverse Split of our common stock in 2008.

            The following table details annual activity under the share repurchase program (Reverse Split adjusted):

	Shares Repurchased (in thousands)		Average Cost per Share		Bonds Repurchased (in millions)
2008	4,035	$	1.91	$	11.1
2007	270	$	29.23	$	2.5
2006	—	$	—	$	—
2005	59	$	95.12	$	—

            Collective Bargaining Agreements

            The following table provides information related to our principal collective bargaining agreements and their respective amendable dates as of December 31, 2008:

Employee Group	Number of Employees	Representing Union	Contract Amendable Date
Pilots and Instructors	2,125	Air Line Pilots Association, International	December 2010
Mechanics	920	International Brotherhood of Teamsters	August 2009
Flight Attendants	1,022	International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers	August 2010
Dispatchers	68	Transport Workers Union of America	July 2009
Production Workers	72	Union of Industrial Production Workers	N/A

            Our other employees are not covered by collective bargaining agreements.

            During 2008, we executed new agreements with our four unions resulting in approximately $20 million in labor savings.  In addition, we realized $10 million in concessions through reductions provided by management and clerical employees.  Furthermore, an additional $5 million was contributed by the airport services division through wage and benefit reductions as well as productivity improvements. 

            Income Taxes 

            The tender offer and partial redemption in August 2008 of the 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 caused Holdings to trigger a change in ownership limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code in August 2008.  Section 382 limits a taxpayer's ability to utilize certain carryover tax attributes after a substantial cumulative change in ownership of their stock. The regulation mandates a three-year “look back” requiring Holdings to evaluate its position related to Section 382 beginning in 2005.  The results of the look back analysis indicated that Holdings triggered Section 382 changes in ownership in April 2005 and in August 2008.  The April 2005 change resulted in an after tax charge of $1.6 million primarily related to interest on the timing of certain tax obligations. Due to the decrease in our market capitalization, the Section 382 change triggered in August 2008 resulted in our conclusion that it was more likely than not that we would not be able to utilize our deferred tax assets due to this limitation and therefore we recorded an increase of $19.3 million to the valuation allowance.  We recorded the effects of this adjustment in 2008 as any impact to previously reported financial statements was not deemed to be material.

            Also during 2008 we recorded $8.5 million in income tax expense to record a valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets related to capital losses and, international and state tax net operating losses as it was concluded more likely than not that adequate income would not be generated to utilize these deferred tax assets based on their characterization and/or carryforward period.

            See the table below for expiration dates of our tax attribute loss carryforwards:

		December 31, 2008 (in millions)	Statutory Carryforward Period	Expiration Year(s)
Net Operating Carryforwards
Federal Loss	$	38.0	20	2020 to 2028
Federal Credit	$	14.3	No expiration	N/A
State Loss	$	14.0	5 to 20	2009 to 2028
International Loss	$	1.8	10	2016 to 2018

            In conjunction with our initial public offering in April 2002, the tax basis of our tangible and intangible assets was adjusted to fair value.  This adjustment to tax basis should result in additional tax deductions being available to us through 2017.  In October 2006, Continental entered into a final settlement agreement with the IRS that included periods during which we were included in its consolidated federal income tax return.  Our taxable income was not adjusted, but the amount of net operating losses allocated to us was increased by approximately $31.2 million.  In accordance with our tax agreement with Continental, to the extent we generate taxable income sufficient to realize the additional tax deductions and tax attributes allocated to us, we are required to pay Continental a percentage of the amount of tax savings actually realized, excluding the effect of any loss carrybacks.  We are required to pay Continental 100% of the first third of the anticipated tax benefit, 90% of the second third and 80% of the last third.  However, if the tax benefits are not realized by the end of 2018, we will be obligated to pay Continental 100% of any benefit realized after that date.  Since these payments are solely dependent on our ability to generate sufficient taxable income to realize these deferred tax assets, they are recorded as an obligation to Continental within the deferred tax asset accounts, and the portion we may retain in the future is offset by a valuation allowance. 

            At the time of the initial public offering, the valuation allowance and the obligation to Continental offset the step-up in basis of assets in our long-term deferred tax asset account.  There were no payments made to Continental under the tax agreement during 2008 and 2007.  We made approximately $24.8 million and $25.3 million of net payments to Continental under the tax agreement related to the additional tax deductions during 2006 and 2005, respectively.  Because of the April 2005 Section 382 change in ownership, our ability to utilize some of the tax attributes flowing from Continental has been limited.  Our losses in 2007 and 2008 carryback to offset the tax shortfall, but result in an interest charge recorded in current tax expense and discussed above.  Our August 2008 Section 382 ownership change limits our ability to realize the gross deferred tax assets recorded at December 31, 2008.  Federal and many state net operating loss carryovers are subject to substantial annual limitations over their remaining life, while our regular federal tax deductions for our tax amortizable intangible assets are limited for the five year period after this ownership change.  We are currently assessing the impact of this limitation including any amounts that may be owed to us by Continental.  If amounts are recoverable from Continental, it may decrease the valuation allowance recorded as of December 31, 2008.

            Our tax agreement increases our dependence on Continental’s financial condition.  If it is determined that any of the tax benefits related to the basis increase should not have been available at the time of utilization and, as a result, we are required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties, then we could be adversely affected if Continental were unable to indemnify us under the agreement.

            For further disclosures related to income taxes, please refer to Note 10 – Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

            Purchase Commitments

            As of December 31, 2008, we have options for 50 ERJ-145XR aircraft that may be exercised for other types of aircraft within the ERJ-145 Family.  Our next option exercise date is April 1, 2009.  If we do not exercise or extend our option as of this date, 25 options will expire.  During 2005, Continental declined the right to include any of the option aircraft under the Continental CPA.  We retain the right to exercise the option and fly these aircraft for other airlines or under our own code, subject to some restrictions; however, we will have to finance our acquisition of these aircraft independently.  Currently, we do not have any firm commitments for aircraft purchases.

            Prior to December 2005, under our power-by-the-hour agreement with Rolls Royce, we were obligated to acquire up to three spare engines to support our existing aircraft and the remaining eight aircraft then on firm order.  In December 2005, we negotiated the sale of eight engines to Rolls Royce and, in exchange, entered into seven new engine leases with a Rolls Royce subsidiary.  The engines leased have greater interchangeability than the engines sold. As a result, we have satisfied our engine obligations and are no longer obligated to purchase the three engines.  These leases are classified as operating leases; hence they are not reflected as assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. 

            We also have other contractual obligations of approximately $0.8 billion under our power-by-the-hour contracts with various service providers.  The power-by-the-hour contracts dictate the method by which we pay a vendor based on our actual level of operations in exchange for vendor coverage on specific parts and equipment on our aircraft when those parts and equipment are in need of repair or replacement.  Each contract varies in term and payment procedure.  The estimated amount of our future commitment is based on assumptions related to future level of operations and forecasted payment rates.  Our level of operations is determined based on Continental’s most recent operating plan for us, which can be altered at Continental’s sole discretion, and our estimates for the 30 aircraft we have re-deployed.  Forecasted payment rates are based on actual rates as of January 1, 2009 and increased annually according to the particular inflation indices detailed in each contract.  Contractual rate increases at actual time of occurrence may be different than the forecasted rates.

            For the year ended December 31, 2008, we spent $10.3 on capital expenditures.  In 2009, we anticipate spending between $2 million and $5 million in capital expenditures of which approximately $1.5 million relate to the rollover of 2008 capital projects.  We expect to fund our future capital commitments substantially through internally generated funds.  However, there can be no assurance that sufficient financing will be available for all aircraft and other capital expenditures not covered by firm financing commitments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into operating leases related to our aircraft, spare engines and facilities.  In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, these arrangements are not reflected on our balance sheet; however, they are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our future financial statements and financial outlook.

            We enter into these arrangements to gain access to aircraft, equipment and facilities without requiring significant capital up front.  Since these assets are used in connection with our consolidated operations, these assets are required to generate substantially all of our passenger revenue.

            If Continental terminated the Continental CPA for cause, it would have the right to terminate our leases or subleases for aircraft covered by the agreement and take possession of them.  In addition, Continental would have the ability to reject the leases and subleases on our aircraft if it filed for bankruptcy protection.  Moreover, with the reduction notice and Continental’s ability to terminate the Continental CPA, we could lose access to some or substantially all of our airport facilities. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for additional information.

            Aircraft Leases.  Our aircraft leases and subleases expire between 2013 and 2022.  As of December 31, 2008, our 2009 expected total minimum annual rental payments under current and future non-cancelable aircraft operating leases for aircraft used in our Corporate Aviation division are approximately $21.9 million.

            Continental is responsible for the remaining lease payments on the 214 aircraft we operate for them under the terms of the Amended Continental CPA.  Over 90% of our aircraft are leased directly by Continental from third parties and subleased by Continental to us.  If Continental were to default under these leases, our ability to retain access to the aircraft could be adversely affected.  See more detailed description of our risks related to our aircraft leases under Item 1A. "Risk Factors."

            Other Leases.  Other leases and subleases are primarily related to ground facilities (airport and maintenance) spare engines, and a flight training device.  These leases have greatly varying terms, which we expect, in most cases, to be renewed or replaced.  As of December 31, 2008, our expected total minimum annual, non-aircraft rental payments for 2009 under current and future non-cancelable operating leases are approximately $14.2 million. The expected total minimum rental payments for 2009, by category, are as follows (in millions):

Airport facilities	$	4.9
Maintenance facilities		3.4
Flight equipment		3.4
Administrative facilities and other		2.5
	$	14.2

            Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

            The following table summarizes the expected effect our material debt (including interest where applicable), operating leases and other contractual obligations have on our future cash flows as of December 31, 2008 (in millions):

		Total		2009		2010		2011		2012		2013		Over 5 Years
11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due   2023 (1)	$	81.4	$	6.8	$	6.8	$	67.8	$	—	$	—	$	—
Other long-term debt (2)		10.1		3.9		3.7		2.5		—		—		—
Aircraft operating leases (3)		142.3		21.9		21.9		21.9		21.9		21.9		32.8
Other operating leases (4)		88.9		14.2		9.7		9.3		9.3		8.9		37.5
Other contractual obligations (5)		833.3		118.2		121.7		125.1		129.2		133.1		206.0
Total expected cash obligations	$	1,156.0	$	165.0	$	163.8	$	226.6	$	160.4	$	163.9	$	276.3

(1)	Following the completion of the tender offer related to our convertible debt in August 2008 and subsequent bond repurchases in the fourth quarter of 2008, $60.8 million aggregate principal of our then 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 remained outstanding.  As provided in the amended indenture governing the notes, such notes have become our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 with an additional repurchase date on August 1, 2011.  The expected impact of our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 on our future cash flows assumes the current principal balance of the notes will be redeemed on August 1, 2011, the earliest date the holders of the notes may require us to repurchase the notes.  If the notes are held until August 1, 2023, the maturity date, our obligations outlined above would increase by $82.1 million as a result of additional interest expense related to these notes.  See Item 8.  “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 9 – Long-term Debt” for a detailed description of these notes.
(2)	Other long-term debt represents our obligation for the advances received under the EDC Loans.  See detailed discussion of our financing arrangement with EDC in Item 8. ”Financial Statement and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 9 – Long-term Debt.”  The expected effect of our financing arrangement with EDC on our future cash flows is calculated based on the six-month LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum and includes principal payments of $9.3 million and estimated interest payments of $0.7 million.
(3)	Aircraft operating lease obligations are the estimated lease payments for the 30 aircraft under long-term operating leases and subleases from Continental as of December 31, 2008. These agreements with Continental have substantially the same terms as the lease agreements between Continental and the third-party lessors, and expire between 2013 and 2022, however, lease obligations are only assumed through the end of the Amended Continental CPA on June 30, 2015.  Consistent with the Amended Continental CPA, lease payments for the 214 covered aircraft will be incurred directly by Continental.  Lease obligations for the remaining 30 aircraft operating outside of the CPA are reflected above at reduced rental rates.
(4)	Other operating lease obligations represent the estimated lease payments for our ground service equipment, spare engines and substantially all of our ground facilities, including facilities at public airports, from Continental or the municipalities or agencies owning and controlling such airports that are under operating leases.  Other operating lease obligations also include the lease payments related to a flight training device.  Continued operations are assumed through normal lease renewals.
(5)	Other contractual obligations primarily include our power-by-the-hour agreement with Rolls Royce.  We expect to fund this commitment with cash generated from operations.  The estimated amount of future commitments for Rolls Royce is based on assumptions related to anticipated future levels of operations and forecasted payment rates.  The level of operations inherent in the estimated amounts for Rolls Royce is based on Continental’s most recent operating plan for Airlines, which can be altered at Continental’s sole discretion and includes our 30 aircraft that are operating in our other lines of business.  Contractual rate increases at actual time of occurrence may be different than the forecasted rate inherent in the amounts for Rolls Royce.

            The actual effects that the listed obligations above may have on our future cash flow may differ materially from our estimates.

Other Contingent Liabilities or Commitments

            We are a party to many contracts in which it is common for us to agree to indemnify third parties for tort liabilities that arise out of or relate to the subject matter of the contract.   In some cases, this indemnity extends to related liabilities arising from the negligence of the indemnified parties, but usually excludes any liabilities caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct.  We cannot estimate the potential amount of future payments under these indemnities until events arise that would trigger a liability under the indemnities.  However, we expect that we would be covered by insurance for any such liabilities, subject to deductibles.

            We are a defendant in various lawsuits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.  While the outcome of these lawsuits and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the ultimate disposition of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

            We have been and are subject to market risks, including commodity price risk (such as, to a limited extent, aircraft fuel prices) and interest rate risk.

Aircraft Fuel

Prior to July 1, 2008, Continental provided all of our aircraft fuel needs for the aircraft covered by the original Continental CPA, and we incurred fuel expense and fuel tax equal to the lower of the actual cost of the fuel and the related taxes or agreed-upon caps of 66.0 cents and 5.2 cents per gallon, respectively.  As a result, our cost of fuel was 71.2 cents per gallon for the six months ended June 30, 2008.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for the cost of providing fuel for all flights and, therefore, effective July 1, 2008, fuel expense is no longer included in our statements of operations for aircraft flying within this arrangement. 

            For the year ended December 31, 2008, Airlines’ consolidated fuel cost, including related fuel taxes, was $1.32 per gallon.  This is due primarily to the changes stated in the Amended Continental CPA.  See fuel discussion at “2008 Amended Continental CPA” above.

Interest Rates

We have potential interest rate exposure with respect to our loan agreement with Export Development Canada, which bears interest at the six-month LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum.  The interest rate applicable to this variable rate note may rise, increasing our interest expense.  The impact of market risk is estimated using a hypothetical increase in interest rates by 100 basis points for our variable rate long-term debt.  Based on this hypothetical assumption, any additional amounts incurred in interest expense for 2008 would not be material.  For 2007 and 2006, we would have incurred an additional $0.1 million and $0.2 million in interest expense, respectively. 

            As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we estimated the fair value of our $60.8 million and $134.7 million (carrying values) convertible notes to be $38.9 million and $130.7 million, respectively, based upon a fair valuation model that considered quoted market prices.  Changes in the fair market value of our fixed-rate debt could be affected by a variety of factors including general investor behavior, industry specific risks and interest rate risks.  Holders of this debt had the right to require that we repurchase their notes on August 1, 2008.  On that date we satisfied $59.7 million in aggregate principal of outstanding notes that had been validly tendered. Following the completion of the tender offer, $68.5 million aggregate principal of our then 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 remained outstanding.  Additionally, as provided in the amended indenture governing the notes, the coupon associated with the notes increased from 4.25% to 11.25% which results in an approximate $2.3 million increase in interest expense on an annual basis.  In accordance with EITF 96-19, we recorded a discount $27.8 million to reflect the $68.5 million aggregate principal of our convertible notes at their fair market value of $40.7 million.  The $27.8 million discount is being accreted to interest expense until the first available repurchase date on August 1, 2011 in conjunction with $2.0 million of capitalized fees associated with the convertible debt refinancing.  In 2008 we purchased $6.5 million par value of our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 and $7.6 million par value (book value of $4.5 million) of our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 for $10.8 million resulting in a net realized gain of $.2 million.  Subsequent to these repurchases our interest expense related to the debt discount described above will be $8.2 million annually through August 2011.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Report of Management	61
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	62
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over     Financial Reporting	63
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the Three Years Ended     December 31, 2008	64
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007	65 - 66
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the Three Years Ended     December 31, 2008	67
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for each of the Three     Years Ended December 31, 2008	68
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	69

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.

            Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements included in this report.  The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and reflect management’s judgments and estimates concerning effects of events and transactions that are accounted for and disclosed.

            Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a -15(f) and 15d - 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  The internal control over financial reporting of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(i)	pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company;
(ii)	provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
(iii)	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

            Management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of internal control.  Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparations and may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

            Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.

            Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been audited by Ernst & Young, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included elsewhere herein.

/s/ JAMES B. REAM                              James B. Ream President and Chief Executive Officer	/s/ LAMPHUNG NGO-BURNS     LamPhung Ngo-Burns Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
/s/ ROBERT BICKMORE                        Robert Bickmore Senior Director and Controller

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.

            We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

            We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

            In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

            We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

	/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Houston, Texas February 27, 2009

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.

We have audited ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). ExpressJet Holdings Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. and our report dated February 27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

	/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Houston, Texas February 27, 2009

EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008			2007			2006
Operating Revenue
Passenger	$	1,276,781		$	1,647,999		$	1,670,544
Ground handling and other		41,432			37,546			11,612
		1,318,213			1,685,545			1,682,156
Operating Expenses:
Wages, salaries and related costs		397,544			437,568			386,678
Aircraft rentals		197,122			344,166			332,441
Aircraft fuel and related taxes		228,048			323,218			227,164
Maintenance, materials and repairs		197,443			202,513			191,399
Other rentals and landing fees		96,215			119,165			115,620
Ground handling		59,553			97,157			99,876
Outside services		48,617			58,320			51,266
Marketing and distribution		25,653			31,391			119
Depreciation and amortization		33,353			29,963			25,770
Impairment of fixed assets and goodwill		20,816			—			—
Special charges		22,384			—			—
Other operating expenses		107,920			148,955			110,752
		1,434,668			1,792,416			1,541,085
Operating Income (Loss)		(116,455	)		(106,871	)		141,071
Nonoperating Income (Expense):
Gain from debt discount		27,785			—			—
Settlement of fuel contracts		23,149			—			—
Impairment charges on investments		(21,483	)		(7,000	)		—
Amortization of debt discount		(3,589	)		—			—
Interest expense		(9,072	)		(8,496	)		(7,335	)
Interest income		5,831			15,744			14,665
Capitalized interest		791			1,330			294
Equity investments loss, net		(1,291	)		(1,304	)		(2,036	)
Other, net		1,542			(275	)		(203	)
		23,663			(1	)		5,385
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes		(92,792	)		(106,872	)		146,456
Income Tax Benefit (Expense)		4,597			36,624			(53,891	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(88,195	)	$	(70,248	)	$	92,565
Basic Earnings (Loss) per Common Share	$	(7.83	)	$	(13.08	)	$	17.18
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Common Share	$	(7.83	)	$	(13.08	)	$	15.64
Shares Used in Computing Basic Earnings (Loss)     per Common Share		11,265			5,369			5,386
Shares Used in Computing Diluted Earnings (Loss)     per Common Share		11,265			5,369			6,153

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)

ASSETS		December 31,
		2008			2007
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	57,528		$	189,259
Restricted cash		20,460			24,756
Short-term investments		41,369			—
Accounts receivable, net		11,212			15,677
Spare parts and supplies, net		23,850			26,598
Income tax receivable		383			37,081
Prepayments and other		6,929			9,013
Total Current Assets		161,731			302,384
Property and Equipment:
Owned property and equipment:
Flight equipment		222,401			233,237
Other		168,291			169,386
		390,692			402,623
Less:  Accumulated depreciation		(169,804	)		(139,044	)
		220,888			263,579
Capital Leases:
Ground service equipment		43			4,338
Less:  Accumulated amortization		(11	)		(4,219	)
		32			119
Total Property and Equipment		220,920			263,698
Investments in Other Entities		1,600			9,713
Reorganization Value in Excess of Amounts Allocable to   Identifiable Assets, net		—			12,789
Airport Operating Rights, net of accumulated amortization   of $0 and $1,560		—			3,440
Debt Issuance Cost, net		1,722			1,970
Other Assets, net		2,916			3,614
Total Assets	$	388,889		$	597,608

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share data)

LIABILITIES AND		December 31,
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		2008			2007
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	3,459		$	138,159
Current maturities of capital lease obligations		3			217
Accounts payable		1,842			4,036
Accrued payroll and related costs		36,672			47,985
Accrued airport service costs		10,221			22,875
Accrued maintenance, materials and repair costs		11,558			19,406
Accrued taxes		10,541			11,434
Air traffic liability		—			18,213
Amounts due to Continental Airlines, net		1,539			4,726
Accrued other liabilities		20,437			29,633
Total Current Liabilities		96,272			296,684
Long-term Debt		5,848			9,308
11.25% Convertible Notes, net of discount of $21,109		39,740			—
Capital Lease Obligations		11			14
Deferred Income Taxes		42,807			49,662
Other Long-term Liabilities		1,750			9,500
Commitments and Contingencies – See Note 15
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock - $.01 par, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no         shares issued or outstanding, respectively		—			—
Common stock - $.01 par, 150,000,000 shares authorized, and         22,024,439 and 5,513,869 shares issued, respectively		220			55
Additional paid-in capital		238,065			171,756
Accumulated earnings  (loss)		(18,744	)		71,786
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(20	)		540
Common stock held in treasury, at cost 4,344,666 and 310,449          shares, respectively		(17,060	)		(11,697	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity		202,461			232,440
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	388,889		$	597,608

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008			2007			2006
Net Cash Flows provided by (used in) Operating Activities	$	(56,092	)	$	(39,930	)	$	118,712
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures		(10,306	)		(48,934	)		(27,542	)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		12,468			—			397
Purchase of short-term investments		(64,425	)		—			—
Proceeds from the sale of short-term investments		9,869			—			—
Investments in and advances to equity ownerships		—			—			(6,414	)
Investments in restricted cash		(2,608	)		(4,349	)		(2,009	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(55,002	)		(53,283	)		(35,568	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Repurchase of common stock		(7,965	)		(8,013	)		—
Payments on note payable to Continental Airlines		—			—			(17,545	)
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations		(14,515	)		(5,023	)		(1,642	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock related to      Employee Stock Purchase Plan		1,307			416			391
Payments related to modification of convertible notes’ terms		(2,000	)		—			—
Other		2,536			3,459			—
Net cash used in financing activities		(20,637	)		(9,161	)		(18,796	)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(131,731	)		(102,374	)		64,348
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Year		189,259			291,633			227,285
Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Year	$	57,528		$	189,259		$	291,633
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid, net	$	5,397		$	6,935		$	7,186
Income taxes paid (refunded) – including payments         (refunds) under tax agreement with Continental Airlines	$	(37,596	)	$	(5,028	)	$	65,783

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(In thousands)

	Common Stock						Treasury Stock							Additional Paid-in Capital			Unearned Compensation on Restricted Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)		Accumulated Earnings (Deficit)			Total
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount
Balance as of December 31, 2005	5,465		$		55		60		$		(5,675	)	$	165,566			(1,518	)	$	—		50,082		$	208,510
Net Income / (Loss)	—				—		—				—			—			—			—		92,565			92,565
Other Postretirement Employee   Benefits, net of tax	—				—		—				—			—			—			364		—			364
Total Comprehensive Income	—				—		—				—			—			—			—		—			92,929
Issuance of common stock   pursuant to stock plans	—				—		(13	)			1,184			(631	)		—			—		(298	)		255
Cancellation of previously   issued equity awards	—				—		2				(113	)		12			—			—		—			(101	)
Amortization of deferred   compensation	—				—		—				—			(1,554	)		1,518			—		—			(36	)
Stock based compensation	—				—		—				—			2,743			—			—		—			2,743
Deferred compensation income   tax effect	—				—		—				—			14			—			—		—			14
Balance as of December 31, 2006	5,465		$		55		49				(4,604	)	$	166,150			—		$	364		142,349		$	304,314
Net Income / (Loss)	—				—		—				—			—			—			—		(70,248	)		(70,248	)
Other Postretirement Employee   Benefits, net of tax	—				—		—				—			—			—			176		—			176
Total Comprehensive Loss	—				—		—				—			—			—			—		—			(70,072	)
Issuance of common stock   pursuant to stock plans	49				—		(11	)			1,074			(61	)		—			—		(315	)		698
Cancellation of previously   issued equity awards	—				—		2				(154	)		—			—			—		—			(154	)
Stock based compensation	—				—		—				—			5,667			—			—		—			5,667
Stock repurchases	—				—		270				(8,013	)		—			—			—		—			(8,013	)
Balance as of December 31, 2007	5,514		$		55		310		$		(11,697	)	$	171,756		$	—		$	540		71,786		$	232,440
Net Income / (Loss)	—				—		—				—			—			—			—		(88,195	)		(88,195	)
Other Postretirement Employee   Benefits, net of tax	—				—		—				—			—			—			(65	)	—			(65	)
Fair value adjustments of short-   term investments, net	—				—		—				—			—			—			(495	)	—			(495	)
Total Comprehensive Loss	—				—		—				—			—			—			—		—			(88,755	)
Issuance of common stock   pursuant to stock plans	130				2		(15	)			2,915			44			—			—		(2,335	)		626
Cancellation of previously   issued equity awards	(2	)			(1	)	15				(313	)		—			—			—		—			(314	)
Equity Settlement - 4.25% Convertible   Notes	16,382				164		—				—			60,835			—			—		—			60,999
Stock based compensation	—				—		—				—			5,430			—			—		—			5,430
Stock repurchases	—				—		4,035				(7,965	)		—			—			—		—			(7,965	)
Balance as of December 31, 2008	22,024		$		220		4,345		$		(17,060	)	$	238,065		$	—		$	(20	)	(18,744	)	$	202,461

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) is engaged in the business of transporting people.  Our principal asset is all of the issued and outstanding shares of stock of XJT Holdings, Inc., the sole stockholder of ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. (referred to in this report as “Airlines” and, together with Holdings, as “ExpressJet”, “we” or “us”).  Airlines currently operates a fleet of 244 aircraft.  As of December 31, 2008, our fleet was assigned as follows:

•  214 aircraft for Continental Airlines (“Continental”) as Continental Express pursuant to a capacity purchase agreement (the “Continental CPA”); and

•  30 aircraft in our Corporate Aviation division, which is dedicated to charter contracts and ad-hoc charter service;

Our primary business is flying 244 aircraft under contractual arrangements for network carriers or entities desiring cost-effective and fully customizable group travel.  During 2008 we dramatically reshaped our business in order to adapt to the unprecedented high fuel costs, recessions in the global economy, reduction in air-travel capacity, and other uncertainties facing the regional airlines, including execution of an agreement with Continental to amend the existing Continental CPA, effective July 1, 2008, (the “Amended Continental CPA”) at lower block hour rates.  Under the terms of the Amended Continental CPA, we are not reimbursed for certain costs, primarily fuel, aircraft rent and certain ground handling services, which were previously recorded as revenue.  We completed most of our transition to the contractually-arranged flying during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2008.  Additionally, we strengthened our balance sheet through the completion of the refinancing of our convertible debt, reducing the debt obligation from $134.7 million as of December 31, 2007, to $60.8 million as of December 31, 2008.  We stabilized the use of operating cash, as a result of the suspension of our Branded Flying operations.   Furthermore, we mutually agreed with Delta Air Lines (“Delta”) to suspend our capacity purchase agreement (the “Delta CPA”) and pro-rate flying agreements (the “Delta Prorate”) effective September 2, 2008. With the suspension of these flying, we anticipate generating cash from our contractual arrangements with Continental and other entities for group travel.  As a result of these changes, and the different basis in reimbursable costs under the Amended Continental CPA, the financial statements between periods are not comparable.

            We also provide aviation services, such as ground-handling at airport locations across the United States, as well as aircraft repair, overhaul, interior refurbishments and paint, through our three wholly-owned subsidiaries, which include ExpressJet Services, LLC (“ExpressJet Services”), American Composites, LLC (“American Composites”) and InTech Aerospace Services, LP (“InTech”) and our, and majority owned subsidiary, Saltillo Jet Center (“Saltillo”).  During the first half of 2007, we rebranded American Composites, InTech and Saltillo resulting in each doing business under the “ExpressJet Services” trade name.  These entities are collectively referred to herein as “Services.”

            Holdings was incorporated in Delaware in August 1996.  Airlines is one of the largest regional airlines in the world, based on 2008 available seat miles, number of regional jets and passengers transported.

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

            (a) Principles of Consolidation –

            The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include the accounts of Holdings and its subsidiaries.  All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

            On August 31, 2006, ExpressJet purchased the remaining 51% interest in American Composites, an aviation maintenance business in Miami, Florida, for $0.8 million in cash and the results of operations were consolidated in our financial statements beginning on September 1, 2006.  Prior to this date, we accounted for this investment under the equity method of accounting as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18 – “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” 

            During 2006, we invested $1.5 million for an 80% interest in Saltillo, an aircraft paint facility located in Saltillo, Mexico.  We invested $9.2 million for the construction of the hangar and office facilities from which the company conducts its operations.  As a result, we consolidated Saltillo beginning on August 1, 2006.

            (b) Use of Estimates –

            The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

            (c) Cash and Cash Equivalents –

            Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into cash and have maturities of three months or less when purchased.  Restricted cash is our collateral for estimated future workers’ compensation claims, letters of credit, charter deposits and holdbacks with our credit card processors.

            Cash flows provided by or used in operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008			2007			2006
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income (loss)	$	(88,195	)	$	(70,248	)	$	92,565
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by     operating activities
Gain from debt discount		(27,785	)		—			—
Amortization of debt discount		3,589			—			—
Gain on repurchase of convertible notes		(179	)		—			—
Gain on sale of short-term investments		(968	)		—			—
Impairment charge on short-term investments		21,482			—			—
Deferred income taxes		(6,728	)		(3,242	)		3,961
Depreciation and amortization		33,353			29,251			25,771
Impairment on intangibles and long-lived assets		20,815			—			—
Bad debt expense		619			785			—
Deferred credits		(7,854	)		—			—
Equity loss from investments in other entities		1,292			8,304			2,036
Stock based compensation		4,464			5,318			2,491
Loss on sale / disposal of assets		5,183			3,168			725
Other, Net		3,548			1,404			26
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash		6,905			(9,487	)		—
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable		3,845			(8,858	)		(3,003	)
(Increase) decrease in spare parts and supplies		535			(4,630	)		894
(Increase) decrease in income tax receivable		36,698			(28,219	)		(8,863	)
(Increase) decrease in prepayments and other		1,735			(602	)		1,660
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		(2,490	)		440			(224	)
(Increase) decrease in amounts due to Continental Airlines		(3,187	)		1,205			8,353
Increase (decrease) in air traffic liability		(18,213	)		18,213			—
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll and related costs		(11,378	)		(1,003	)		(1,521	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued airport service costs		(12,654	)		4,310			1,969
Increase (decrease) in accrued maintenance		(7,848	)		1,706			74
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		(12,676	)		12,255			(8,202	)
Net Cash Flows provided by (used in) Operating Activities	$	(56,092	)	$	(39,930	)	$	118,712

            (d) Short-term Investments –

            Short-term investments are comprised of auction-rate securities (“ARS”) which are primarily backed by student loans that are guaranteed by the U.S. government.  Our ARS are reflected at fair value using a discounted cash flow valuation model.  As of December 31, 2008 we estimated the fair value of our ARS to be $41.4 million.

            (e) Accounts Receivables, net –

            Accounts receivable are stated at the historical carrying amount net of write-offs and allowance for uncollectible accounts.  Our allowance for uncollectible accounts at the end of 2008 and 2007 was $0.7 million and $0.4 million.

            (f) Spare Parts and Supplies, net –

Inventories, expendable parts and supplies relating to flight equipment are carried at average acquisition cost and are expensed when used.  An allowance for obsolescence is provided over the remaining estimated useful life of the related aircraft, plus allowances for spare parts currently identified as excess to reduce the carrying costs to the lower of amortized cost or net realizable value.  These allowances are based on our estimates, which are subject to change.  Our allowance for obsolescence as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $12.9 million and $11.5 million, respectively.

            (g) Property and Equipment –

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated to estimated residual values over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method.  Property and equipment acquired under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the future minimum lease payments or the fair value of the asset at the inception of the lease.  The estimated useful lives and residual values for our property and equipment are as follows:

	Estimated Useful Life	Estimated Residual Value
Flight Equipment	5 to 25 years	0% to 15%
Ground property and equipment	2 to 10 years	0%
Capital lease - flight and ground	3 to 8 years	0%
Software	5 years	0%
Leasehold Improvements	Lease Term	0%
Buildings	30 years	0%

            Amortization related to assets under capital leases and operating leasehold improvements is included in our depreciation and amortization expense on the income statement.  We amortize assets under capital leases and operating leasehold improvements over the shorter of the asset life or lease term.

            In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 – “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we record impairment losses on long–lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets.  The net carrying value of assets not recoverable is reduced to fair value.

            As shown in the following table, our aircraft fleet consisted of 244 regional jets as of December 31, 2008.  We currently lease or sublease all of our existing regional jet aircraft from Continental.  See “Note 8 -  Leases.”  Our aircraft options as of December 31, 2008 are also shown below.  See Item 7.  “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Liquidity and Capital Commitments – Purchase Commitments.”

Type	Total Leased Aircraft	Options	Seats in Standard Configuration
ERJ-145XR	104	50	50
ERJ-145	134	—	50
ERJ-145	6	—	41
Total	244	50

            All 244 aircraft were placed in service prior to 2007.  Our next option exercise date is April 1, 2009.  If we do not exercise or extend our option as of this date, 25 options will expire.  Pursuant to our agreement with Embraer, the 50 options may be exercised for any type of aircraft within the ERJ-145 line of aircraft, which include the ERJ-145 Family, at our discretion.

            (h) Intangible and Other Assets –

Reorganization Value in Excess of Amounts Allocable to Identifiable Assets (“goodwill”) represents primarily the amount that arose from Continental’s emergence from bankruptcy reorganization in 1993.  Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted and began to account for this asset in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142–“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”).  SFAS 142 requires testing of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment rather than amortizing them.  Our goodwill is related to our Contract Flying segment.

            We evaluate the carrying value of this asset each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.  We perform an impairment review on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired.  Our annual impairment test, which is performed as of June 30 of each year, includes the acquisition, market-multiple and income approaches to valuation.  If this review indicates that our goodwill will not be recoverable, the carrying value is reduced to the fair value.  During 2008 we determined our goodwill was fully impaired due to the restructuring of our agreement with Continental and recorded a non-cash charge of $12.8 million. 

            Airport operating rights, the rights to use certain take-off and landing slots and gates, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related airport facility lease, which approximates 20 years, with no residual value.  During 2008 we sold the Airport operating rights at net book value. 

            Capitalized costs related to our senior convertible notes is amortized on a straight-line basis through August 2011, the first date at which we may be required to repurchase the notes, with no residual value.

            (i) Investments in Other Entities –

            Investments in unconsolidated companies are accounted for by the equity method of accounting when we have significant influence over the operation of the companies as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18 – “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock” (“ABP 18”).  We review our investments in unconsolidated affiliates for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investments may not be fully recoverable. Evidence of a loss in value that is other than temporary might include the length of time and extent to which the fair value of the investment has been less than the carrying amount of the equity investment, the near and longer-term operating and financial prospects of the entity and our longer-term intent of retaining the investment in the entity. Management’s assessment as to whether any decline in value is other than temporary is based on our ability and intent to hold the investment and whether evidence indicating the carrying value of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary.  If the fair value of the investment is determined to be less than the carrying value and the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, an appropriate write-down is recorded based on the excess of the carrying value over the best estimate of fair value of the investment. 

            (j) Deferred Credits –

            Our spare part and flight training credits are primarily derived from our purchase agreement with Embraer.  All spare part credits are used to offset the purchase price of initial spare parts provisioning for our newly delivered aircraft.  Similarly, the flight training credits are used to pay for the initial simulator rent costs for our pilots.  These credits are recorded in long-term liabilities, with an offsetting entry to prepayments and other current assets or current accrued liabilities if we used more credits than the amount we are entitled to at year-end.  The deferred credits are amortized as a reduction to our aircraft rent expense over the life of the associated aircraft lease.  Amortization totaled $0.5 million and $0.9 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively.  The prepayments and other current assets or current accrued liabilities are reduced as the credits are used or as the remaining firm order aircraft are delivered.  Due to the transition in our business model, we wrote off $7.9 million in deferred credits in 2008.

            (k) Operating Revenue –

            Passenger Revenue.  Prior to July 1, 2008, we were entitled to receive payment for each block hour that Continental scheduled us to fly pursuant to the terms of the Continental CPA.  Payment was based on a formula designed to provide Airlines with a target operating margin of 10% before taking into account variations in certain costs and expenses that were generally within our control.  We had exposure for most labor costs and some maintenance and general administrative expenses if actual costs were higher than those budgeted in our block hour rates.  For the first six months of 2008, we recognized revenues using 2007 block hour rates, pursuant to our agreement with Continental reached in June 2008.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, certain costs are no longer reimbursable (primarily fuel, rent and certain ground handling costs), and therefore such items are presented net in the accompanying Consolidate Results of Operations from the periods July 1, 2008 forward.

            In June 2008, we reached an agreement with Continental to amend the existing Continental CPA.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, which became effective July 1, 2008, we recognize revenue based on fixed contractual rates.  See “– Note 2 – Contract Flying” for further details regarding the Continental CPA.

            Under the Delta CPA, we received a base rate for each completed block hour and departure and were reimbursed for certain pass-through costs.  We recorded the base rate and the reimbursements for pass-through costs as passenger revenue.  Effective September 2, 2008, we mutually agreed with Delta to terminate this agreement.

            Effective September 2, 2008, we terminated our branded flying operations.  Prior to September 2, 2008, tickets for Branded Flying were sold and processed internally, with amounts due settled either by cash payments up front or pursuant to the terms of our agreements with various credit card service vendors.  Additionally, we accepted flight coupons to carry passengers on our aircraft from other air carriers, which were then processed internally and settled on a monthly basis through an airline clearing house, as appropriate, or pursuant to the terms of various industry or codeshare agreements, such as the Delta Prorate Agreement.  We recognized passenger revenue when transportation was provided or when an unused ticket expired.  Nonrefundable tickets expired on the date of the intended flight, unless the date was extended by notification from the customer in advance of the intended flight.  As of December 31, 2008, obligations related to our branded flying air traffic liability have been satisfied.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the amount of passenger ticket sales not yet recognized as revenue is included in our consolidated balance sheets as air traffic liability.   Amounts receivable from other air carriers under interline agreements were $1.3 million and $2.6 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  We recognized $18 million in revenue as a result of the cessation of operations due to the adjustments to our air traffic liability, frequent flier liability and certain termination payments.

            Our Corporate Aviation customers typically prepay flights based on estimated charges to be incurred.  Such prepayments are held in escrow and recorded as restricted cash and deferred revenue until the flights have operated.  At that time we recognize the associated revenue and release the funds from escrow.

            We are also required to collect certain taxes and fees from the passengers on behalf of government agencies and remit these back to the applicable agency on a periodic basis.  These taxes and fees include U.S. federal transportation taxes, federal security charges, and airport passenger facility charges.  These items are collected from our customers at the time they purchase their tickets, but are not included in passenger revenue.  We record a liability upon collection from the customer and release the liability when payments are remitted to the applicable governmental agency.

            Ground Handling and Other.  We recognize our non-passenger revenue, ground handling and other revenues as services are provided. 

            (l) Segment Reporting –

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” (“Statement 131”) requires disclosures related to components of a company for which separate financial information is available if that segregated information is evaluated regularly by the company’s chief operating decision makers in deciding the allocation of resources and assessing performance.  ExpressJet has three major reportable segments:  Contract Flying, Branded Flying and Aviation Services.

            (m) Wages, Salaries and Related Expenses –

As our collective bargaining agreements become amendable, we accrue for anticipated retroactive pay that we estimate will be due under the new contract.  We have three stock-based compensation plans:  the ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. 2002 and 2007 Stock Incentive Plans and the ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  The Company accounts for stock-based compensation utilizing the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.”  See “– Note 13 Stock-Based Compensation Plans” for further details.

We are currently self-insured for a portion of our healthcare costs and have a large deductible for our workers compensation liability.  Consequently, reserves for the cost of claims that have not been paid or benefit costs that have been incurred but not yet reported (“IBNR”) as of a given date are estimated. 

            (n) Aircraft & Facilities Leases –

            All of our aircraft are either leased or sub-leased from Continental.  The Amended Continental CPA changed the way we pay rent for aircraft covered under the Continental CPA.  Effective July 1, 2008, we no longer pay aircraft lease rent to Continental for the 214 aircraft covered under the Amended CPA with Continental.  Lease payments to Continental relating to the 30 aircraft removed from the Continental CPA are at reduced rates.  We also have airport and maintenance facility leases that are leased from airport authorities or other municipal authorities.  In order to determine the proper classification of a lease as either an operating lease or a capital lease, we must make certain estimates at the inception of the lease relating to the economic useful life and the fair value of an asset, as well as select an appropriate discount rate to be used in discounting future lease payments. The assumptions used in our lease classification analyses are based on our interpretation of available market data and specific contract terms.  See”- Note 8 Leases” for further details.

            (o) Maintenance and Repair Costs –

Maintenance and repair costs for owned and leased flight equipment, including the overhaul of aircraft components, are charged to operating expense as incurred, except for those maintenance costs covered by power-by-the-hour agreements, which are expensed based on contractual terms.  In 2008 and 2007, power-by-the-hour arrangements represented approximately 71% and 75%, respectively, of our maintenance, materials and repairs costs.

            (p) Income Taxes –

Deferred income taxes, which are provided under the liability method, are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws.  Operating losses which are dependent on the generation of future taxable income are recorded as a deferred tax asset.   A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that future tax benefits will not be realized.  Operating losses for 2007 recorded as a receivable represent the amount which was carried back and applied against previous years’ income.  See “– Note 10 Income Taxes” for further information on income taxes.

            (q) Fair Value Measurements –

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“Statement 157”), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  Statement 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value.  We adopted the provisions of Statement 157 as of January 1, 2008 for our financial assets and liabilities.  The FASB deferred the effective date of Statement 157 for one year as it relates to fair value measurement requirements for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis until 2009, which we do not expect to impact the Company. 

            Statement 157 provides a consistent definition of fair value which focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs.  The standard also establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.  The three tiers of fair value input are defined below:

•  Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology which are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

•  Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology which are quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

•  Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology which are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

            As of December 31, 2008, we held cash equivalents and short-term investments of ARS that were required to be measured at fair value.  See “-Note 5 Fair Value Measurements” for further information on fair value measurements.

            (r) Financial Instruments and Risk Management –

            Financial Instruments.  Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, long-term secured debt to Export Development Canada (“EDC”), note payable to Continental (which has been repaid in full) and 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.  The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the highly liquid nature of these short-term instruments.  As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of the EDC Loans was approximately $7.2 million and $12.4 million, respectively.  As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we estimated the fair value of our $60.8 million and $134.7 million (carrying value) fixed-rate debt to be $38.9 million and $130.7 million, respectively, based upon quoted market prices. 

            Credit Risk Due to Certain Concentrations.  We provide Continental the majority of its regional jet capacity at its hub airports, as well as additional non–hub service.  We are economically dependent upon Continental as most of our revenue and cash flows are received from Continental.  See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for a detailed discussion of this and other risks.  If Continental defaults on the payment obligations it has to us under the Continental CPA or other agreements, then in addition to any other remedies we may have, we can offset the amount of the defaulted payments against the amounts we owe to Continental under any agreements in an amount corresponding to its defaulted payments. 

            (s) Recently Issued Accounting Standards –

            In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) affirmed the consensus of FASB Staff Position APB 14-1 (FSP APB 14-1), “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”, which applies to all convertible debt instruments that have a ‘‘net settlement feature’’, which means that such convertible debt instruments, by their terms, may be settled either wholly or partially in cash upon conversion.  FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly or partially in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner reflective of the issuers’ nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is not permitted and retroactive application to all periods presented is required.  The adoption of FSP APB 14-1 will affect the historical accounting for our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes and our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.  We are continuing to evaluate the impact of this standard to our results of operations and financial position however; we expect that the ultimate application of FSP APB 14-1 will result in an increase in interest expense for the years presented.  In addition, the Company is evaluating the impact this standard will have on our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.

            (t) Reclassifications –

            Certain reclassifications have been made in prior years’ financial statements to conform to the current year presentation, including adjustments to common stock, additional paid-in capital, and share amounts due to our reverse split (“Reverse Split”) of our common stock in 2008.  In addition, $2.5 million of operating revenue as of December 31, 2006 was reclassed to other operating expenses on the consolidated statement of operations and a $2.0 million increase in restricted cash was reclassed from net cash provided by operating activities to net cash used in investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Note 2 – Contract Flying 

            As of December 31, 2008, we averaged over 950 daily flights in our Contract Flying, offering passenger service to over 130 scheduled destinations in North America, including Mexico as well as the Caribbean.  We generated $1.1 billion of revenue (80.3% of our total consolidated revenue) in this segment.

            Continental Capacity Purchase and Other Agreements

            General.  A significant portion of our revenue and cash flows is attributable to the Continental CPA.  Under the Continental CPA, Airlines operates flights on behalf of Continental as Continental Express.  Continental controls and is responsible for scheduling, pricing and managing seat inventories and is entitled to all revenue associated with the operation of the aircraft.  We also have various other agreements with Continental that govern our relationship.

            Under the Continental CPA, all marketing-related costs normally associated with operating an airline are borne by Continental.  These costs include:

•  reservations and sales;                                              

•  commissions;

•  advertising;

•  revenue accounting;

•  fare and tariff filings; and

•  food and beverage service.

            2008 Amended Continental CPA.  Prior to July 1, 2008, Airlines was entitled to receive payment for each block hour that Continental scheduled it to fly pursuant to the terms of the Continental CPA.  Payment was based on a formula designed to provide Airlines with a target operating margin of 10% before taking into account variations in certain costs and expenses that were generally within our control.  We had exposure for most labor costs and some maintenance and general administrative expenses if actual costs were higher than those budgeted in our block hour rates.  For the first six months of 2008, we recognized revenues using 2007 block hour rates, pursuant to our agreement with Continental reached in June 2008.

At such time, we also reached an agreement with Continental to amend the existing Continental CPA.  The Amended Continental CPA, which became effective July 1, 2008, allows us to continue flying, at minimum, 205 aircraft for Continental for seven years while providing Continental the right after one year to reduce the number of aircraft to a minimum of 190 aircraft.  (It should be noted going forward in our document, we will use the designation, “the Continental CPA,” for matters that remained same between the original CPA and the Amended Continental CPA; where matters differed between the original CPA and the Amended Continental CPA, they will be specifically identified to “the Amended Continental CPA.”)The Amended Continental CPA significantly reduces Continental’s governance rights under the original CPA, including easing change-of-control limitations on ExpressJet, reducing restrictions on our flying into Continental’s hub airports, and removing the most-favored-nation clause, allowing us the option to fly for other carriers and to consider other strategic alternatives.  The Amended Continental CPA also removes Continental’s ability to terminate the agreement without cause.

            The Amended Continental CPA provides payments to us at a pre-determined rate based on block hours flown and reimburses us for various pass-through expenses including passenger liability insurance, hull insurance, war risk insurance, landing fees and substantially all regional jet engine expenses under current long-term third-party contracts with no margin or mark-up.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for the cost of providing fuel for all flights and for paying aircraft rent for all aircraft covered by the Amended Continental CPA and, therefore, these items are not included in our statements of operations for the three month period ended September 30, 2008 and thereafter.  The fixed block hour rates are considerably lower than the rates under the original agreement and will be subject to annual escalations tied to a consumer price index (capped at 3.5%) at each anniversary date, July 1.  During 2008, we returned as part of the Amended Continental CPA negotiations, 30 aircraft, with Continental bearing the expense related to the aircraft following their return.  We will continue to operate at least 205 aircraft through July 1, 2009.  Beginning on July 1, 2009, Continental can remove up to 15 aircraft making the new minimum aircraft requirement under the agreement 190.  Therefore, we will continue to focus on aggressively managing costs in response to the Amended Continental CPA and the economic difficulties facing the entire airline industry. 

            We also entered into a settlement agreement with Continental to release the parties’ claims at the time of the agreement to amend the then existing capacity purchase agreement, relating to certain identified payments under such capacity purchase agreement, including disputes previously disclosed as possible matters for arbitration.

            In September 2008, we agreed with Continental on the first amendment to the Amended Continental CPA in order to compensate us for our fixed costs, considered in the calculation of the pre-determined block hour rates, that cannot be reduced as a result of the unanticipated reduction in aircraft utilization by Continental’s scheduling. We also agreed that if Continental, beginning in year two, increases its aircraft utilization above a predetermined threshold, then it may receive discounts on the agreed, pre-determined block hour rates.  For the last six months of 2008, we recognized an additional $3.4 million in contract revenues as compensation for shortfalls in aircraft utilization.

            In December 2008, we agreed with Continental on the first second amendment to the Amended Continental CPA in order to clarify certain issues related to our revenue recognition, the fuel efficiency program in place in connection with the Amended Continental CPA and depreciation related to the aircraft we operate for Continental and excess inventory related thereto.

            Prior Years’ Settlement of the Continental CPA.  Airlines was entitled to receive payment for each block hour that Continental scheduled it to fly.  Payment was based on a formula designed to provide Airlines with a target operating margin before taking into account variations in certain costs and expenses that were generally within our control.  We had exposure for most labor costs and some maintenance and general administrative expenses if actual costs were higher than those budgeted in our block hour rates.  Prior years’ payment methodologies are described in the following paragraphs.

            2005-2007.   As part of the 2005 rate negotiations, we agreed to cap Airlines’ prevailing margin at 10.0% in an attempt to ensure the long-term stability of the Continental CPA.  Airlines also began including previously unreconciled costs, as discussed above, within the margin band, although it was not reimbursed if these costs are higher and cause its prevailing margin to fall below the 8.5% margin floor.  Airlines remained entitled to receive incentive payments from Continental if its rate of controllable cancellations was lower than its historical benchmark, but was no longer required to pay Continental a penalty for controllable cancellations unless the rate rises above 0.5%.   Airlines continued to receive a small per-passenger fee and incentive payments for certain on-time departure and baggage handling performance.

            The table below describes how variations between Airlines’ actual costs and estimated costs, as determined in the block hour rates, were treated under the Continental CPA from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2008.

Fully reconciled costs: reconciliation payment, including 10% margin, to the full extent actual costs differ from estimated costs.
• Fuel and into-plane expenses(1)  • Aircraft rent  • Terminal facility rent  • On-time bonuses and 401(k) company     match under current plans  • Taxes (other than income taxes)  • Passenger liability insurance  • Hull insurance  • War risk insurance  • Landing fees  • Ground handling services	• Administrative services provided by     Continental  • Third-party security and screening    expenses  • Substantially all regional jet engine    expenses under current long-term    third-party contracts  • Depreciation and amortization(2)  • Glycol, de-icing, snow removal  • International navigational fees
Costs within the margin band: if actual expenses in this category are sufficiently different from estimates used in the block hour rates so that the prevailing margin is less than 8.5% or greater than 10.0%, then a reconciliation payment is made by either Continental or Airlines to the other so that this prevailing margin will be 8.5% or 10.0%, as applicable.  If the prevailing margin is less than 8.5% due to impact of certain costs, as described below, or if the prevailing margin is above 10.0% due to other items(3), no reconciliation payments would be made from either Continental or Airlines.
• Maintenance, materials and repairs not     included above  • Passenger services	• Other rental expenses • Other operating expenses

(1)	Under our fuel purchase agreement with Continental, fuel and fuel tax expense are reconciled to the  lower of the actual costs or the agreed-upon caps of 66.0 cents per gallon and 5.2 cents per gallon, respectively.  If the fuel purchase agreement with Continental were not in place, the fuel cost, including related taxes, would have been $2.43, $2.04 and $1.80 per gallon for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively.
(2)	Depreciation is reconciled for assets and capital projects accounted for in the Continental CPA or those approved by Continental outside of the agreement.
(3)	The prevailing margin used to calculate the reconciliation payment does not take into account performance incentive payments, including payments from controllable cancellation performance, litigation costs above a historical benchmark and other costs that are not included in the block hour rates (or covered by adjustments to them) or are not reasonable and customary in the industry.

            In 2007, the fully reconciled costs and costs within the margin band under the Continental CPA represented approximately 59% and 40% of operating costs associated with Continental CPA flying, respectively, in addition to 1% of costs related to the Continental CPA which could not be included in either reimbursable grouping such as certain labor and arbitration costs.  In 2006, the fully reconciled costs and costs within the margin band under the Continental CPA represented approximately 63% and 35% of operating costs associated with Continental CPA flying, respectively.  The remaining 2% of operating costs in 2006 were incurred outside of the Continental CPA in order to support our diversification strategies for the 69 aircraft released from the Continental CPA as well as the administrative operations we assumed from Continental in 2007.

            Some costs that were unreconciled under the Continental CPA prior to 2005 now require Airlines to make a reconciliation payment to Continental if the differences cause the prevailing margin to be greater than 10.0%.  However, if the differences cause the prevailing margin to be less than 8.5%, they remain unreconciled.  These costs are:

•  wages and salaries; and

•  benefits not included in the table above.

2007 Arbitration.  In 2006, Continental challenged our interpretation of the Continental CPA and sought to impose rates for 2007 that we believed were inconsistent with the methodology established in the agreement.  We were unable to agree on the 2007 rates and, in accordance with the terms of the Continental CPA, we submitted our dispute to binding arbitration.  The arbitration panel determined that the annual 2007 budgeted rates originally presented by Airlines should be reduced in the aggregate by $14.2 million (or less than 1.0% of our total Continental CPA operating revenue), which included the 10% target operating margin.  Although we believe our original rates were appropriate, we were pleased with the panel’s decision.  The 2007 scheduled block hour rates were finalized in October 2007, and we recorded our passenger revenue under the Continental CPA using the block hour rates determined by the panel for all of 2007.

Note 3- Restructuring and Related Special Charges

            Effective July 1, 2008, we entered into a new seven-year capacity purchase agreement with Continental by amending and restating the existing Continental CPA.  The amended agreement is based on fixed block hour rates that are considerably lower than the rates under the original agreement, which was designed to achieve an approximate 10% margin.  Additionally, we suspended flying under our branded flying operations and terminated the Delta CPA and the Delta Prorate in September 2008.  In connection with these capacity reductions and the transition of 30 aircraft back to Continental, we incurred special charges of $22.4 million related to aircraft, employee reductions and certain other charges.  

            Special Charges

            The following table sets forth the special charges recorded for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 related to the capacity reductions noted above (in thousands):

		Year Ended December 31,
		2008			2007
Wages and fringe	$	19,246		$	—
Lease return costs		2,174			—
Deferred Credits		(7,854	)		—
Contract termination costs		1,658			—
Unused facility costs		6,287			—
Other		873			—
	$	22,384		$	—

            Wages and Fringe.  As a result of our restructuring we implemented a reduction in workforce and recorded $19.2 million in severance and continuing medical coverage and other fringe benefits for employees accepting early retirement.  We do not expect additional charges related to the reduction in workforce to be significant.  

            Lease Return Costs.  We incurred $2.2 million in costs during 2008 to retrofit 39 returned aircraft to comply with the return conditions specified in the subleases.  These costs included labor and materials to repair, paint, and modify the interiors to prelease conditions. 

            Deferred Credits.  We wrote off $7.9 million in deferred credits in 2008.  The credits were from the aircraft manufacturer to cover training and spare parts purchases and were being amortized against aircraft rent expense over the lives of the underlying aircraft leases.  Due to the transition in our business model, we no longer are charged aircraft rent and accordingly wrote off the deferred credits.

            Contract Termination Costs.  During 2008, we incurred $1.7 million in early termination payments to sever contractual relationships that supported our Branded Flying operations.  We are currently in negotiation with other parties to settle early contract terminations so there may be additional contract termination charges in 2009, however we do not expect the charges to be significant.

            Unused Facility Costs and Other.  We recorded a charge of $6.3 million in 2008 for the future rent obligations related to facility leases at locations that supported our suspended operations.  Payments remaining on these lease obligations will continue through 2010.  In addition, we incurred $0.9 million in 2008 to redeploy certain general service equipment from our unused facilities to our other lines of business.

            The above costs are reflected in the line “Special charges” on our consolidated statements of operations. 

            As of December 31, 2008 our accruals for special charges we expect to pay in cash are as follows (in thousands):

		Balance December 31, 2007		Special Charges		Payments/ Adjustments			Balance December 31, 2008
Wages and fringe	$	—	$	19,246	$	(18,949	)	$	297
Leased return costs		—		2,174		(2,174	)		—
Contract termination costs		—		1,658		(688	)		970
Unused facility costs		—		6,287		(2,335	)		3,952
Other		—		873		(873	)		—
	$	—	$	30,238	$	(25,019	)	$	5,219

            Payments related to the wages and fringe accrual and contract termination costs will be made in 2009.  Payments remaining on our lease obligations for unused facilities will continue through 2010.

            In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144) we record impairment charges on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired, the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets and the net book value of the assets exceeds their estimated fair value.  As a result of our impairment test, we concluded the carrying values of certain of our long-lived assets, primarily leasehold improvements in our at-risk flying segment were no longer recoverable.  Consequently, during 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $8.0 million to write these long-lived assets down to their estimated fair values.  Fair values were determined based on estimated future cash flows for Branded Flying which were considered nominal.  No portion of the impairment charge will result in future cash expenditures.  All other long-lived assets for our other reportable segments were tested for impairment but were concluded to be recoverable with projected undiscounted cash flows.

            Goodwill of $12.8 million represents an amount associated with Continental’s bankruptcy restructuring and was recorded on our books prior to ExpressJet’s IPO from Continental in 2002.  In accordance with SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), we apply a fair value based impairment test to the net book value of goodwill on an annual basis and if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred on an interim basis.  The analysis of potential impairment of goodwill requires a two-step process.  The first step is the estimation of fair value.  If step one indicates that impairment potentially exists, the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any.  Goodwill impairment exists when the estimated fair value of goodwill is less than our carrying value.

            Goodwill is allocated to our contract flying reportable segment.  We estimated fair value based on a discounted projection of future cash flows, supported with market based valuation.  During 2008, we determined goodwill was impaired and recorded a non-cash charge of $12.8 million.  

            The impairment charges for both long-lived assets and goodwill total $20.8 million.  These charges are reflected in the line “Impairment of fixed assets and goodwill” on our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.

            Fuel.  Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental is responsible for the cost of providing fuel for all flights and, therefore, effective July 1, 2008, fuel expense is no longer included in our statements of operations for aircraft flying within this arrangement.  Upon the decision to suspend operations for Airlines’ Branded Flying on July 8, 2008, we sold our fixed forward purchase contracts for periods subsequent to September 2, 2008, which resulted in a non-operating gain of approximately $23 million.  To date, we have received $21 million in cash from World Fuel Services with the remaining $2 million held in deposit for future fuel purchases within our Corporate Aviation division.  The funds held in deposit by World Fuel Services earn interest.

Note 4 – Segment Reporting

            The following business discussion is based on the three reportable segments, Contract Flying, Branded Flying and Aviation Services, as they were structured during the year ended December 31, 2008.

            A significant portion of our operating expenses and infrastructure is integrated across segments (e.g., for maintenance, non-airport facility rentals, outside services, general and administrative expenses) in order to support our entire fleet of aircraft; therefore, we do not allocate these costs to the individual segments identified above, but evaluate them for our consolidated operation.  The presentation of our consolidated shared costs is consistent with the manner in which these expenses are reviewed by our chief operating decision makers.  Consequently, the tables below present (in thousands) our operating revenues, including inter-segment revenues, and segment profit / (losses) generated per reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.  We also included our reconciliation of the consolidated operating revenue to consolidated net loss before taxes and of our total assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.

		Contract Flying			Branded Flying			Aviation Services		Eliminations			Consolidated
Year ended December 31, 2008:
Revenue from customers	$	1,059,325		$	222,007		$	43,841	$	(6,960	)	$	1,318,213
Direct segment expenses		792,611			289,894			23,862		(6,960	)		1,099,407
Segment profit (loss)	$	266,714		$	(67,887	)	$	19,979	$	—		$	218,806
Special charges (1)		(13,498	)		(29, 701	)							(43,199	)
Other shared expenses (2)													(292,062	)
Gain from debt discount													27,785
Settlement of fuel contracts					23,149								23,149
Impairment charges on investments													(21,483	)
Amortization of debt discount													(3,589	)
Interest expense													(9,072	)
Interest Income													6,622
Other													251
Consolidated loss before income taxes												$	(92,792	)
Assets as of December 31, 2008
Segment assets (3)	$	136,519		$	35,802		$	13,933	$	—		$	186,254
Other shared assets (4)													202,635
Total consolidated assets												$	388,889

(1)	Shared special charges for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, include $21.7 million related to suspended flying under several lines of our at-risk operations in addition to a $12.8 million impairment of goodwill, and $8.0 million impairment of fixed assets and $0.7 million charge related to base closure costs.
(2)	Some of the major components of other shared expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 are maintenance labor – $77.5 million; general and administrative labor and related expenses – $71.0 million; other general and administrative expenses – $91.3 million; outside services – $36.0 million; and non-airport rentals – $10.0 million.  Transition costs incurred were approximately $6.3 million.
(3)	Assets for the Branded Flying segment will continue to be utilized by the Company and are in process of being redeployed across all operations as of December 31, 2008.
(4)	Other shared assets include assets that are being redeployed to other business segments.

		Contract Flying		Branded Flying			Aviation Services		Eliminations			Consolidated
Year ended December 31, 2007:
Revenue from customers	$	1,471,538	$	180,520		$	41,011	$	(7,524	)	$	1,685,545
Direct segment expenses		1,128,538		295,114			25,423		(7,524	)		1,441,551
Segment profit (loss)	$	343,000	$	(114,594	)	$	15,588	$	—		$	243,994
Other shared expenses (1)												(350,905	)
Impairment charges on investments												(7,000	)
Interest expense												(8,496	)
Interest Income												17,074
Other												(1,539	)
Consolidated loss before income   taxes											$	(106,872	)
Assets as of December 31, 2007:
Segment assets	$	179,336	$	36,528		$	15,515	$	—		$	231,379
Other shared assets (2)												366,229
Total consolidated assets
											$	597,608

(1)

Some of the major components of other shared expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 are maintenance labor - $76.9 million; general and administrative labor and related expenses - $95.8 million; other general and administrative expenses – $105.5 million; outside services - $44.5 million; and non-airport rentals - $14.6 million.  Transition costs incurred were approximately $13.6 million.

(2)

Other shared assets include assets that are interchangeable between segments..

Note 5 – Fair Value Measurements.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“Statement 157”), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  Statement 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring it and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value.  We adopted the provisions of Statement 157 as of January 1, 2008 for our financial assets and liabilities.  However, the FASB deferred the effective date of Statement 157 for one year as it relates to fair value measurement requirements for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis until 2009, which we do not expect to materially impact the Company.

            The new standard provides a consistent definition of fair value which focuses on exit price and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. The standard also establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.  The three tiers of fair value input are defined below:

•  Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology which are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

•  Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology which are quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

•  Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology which are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

            In February 2008, we invested in approximately $65 million in ARS which are classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at fair value.  The fair value of our ARS is estimated using a discounted cash flow valuation model as of December 31, 2008.  As of December 31, 2008, we continue to earn interest at an average rate of 1.72% on all of our ARS.  At the end of each quarter we record any changes in fair value related to these instruments that we deem to be temporary to accumulated other comprehensive income.  If we determine that any future decline in value was other than temporary, it would be recognized as a charge to earnings as appropriate.

            Our valuation model considers, among other items, the collateralization underlying the ARS, the creditworthiness of our counterparties, the timing of expected future cash flows, and a discount rate which accounts for the liquidity issue associated with the current market conditions.  These securities were also compared, where possible, to other observable market data with similar characteristics, however, due to the contraction in the credit markets and other factors, the market for ARS is currently trading at minimal volumes.  As we could not predict when the market would recover and needed to avail ourselves the flexibility to sell our ARS in the next 12 months, we evaluated and classified, in accordance with accounting guidance our ARS as short-term investments and recognized in the first quarter of 2008 an other-than-temporary impairment of $13.7 million.  This impairment charge was recognized as “Impairment charges on investments” in our consolidated statement of operations.  As of December 31, 2008, we estimated the fair value of our ARS investment to be $41.4 million and recorded net unrealized gains or losses to other comprehensive income, accordingly.  Our total net comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $0.5 million.

            Subsequent to year-end, we monetized $4.2 million of our ARS for 87.5% of the face value of the securities.  We continue to monitor the ARS market and will aggressively pursue monetizing the assets at or near face value through additional market transactions and will also pursue litigation if necessary to recoup full value.

            Assets that we measure at fair value on a recurring basis are shown below (in thousands):  

	As of December 31, 2008 Fair Value Measurements Using
		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Cash equivalents	$	56,625	$	56,625	$	—	$	—
Short-term investments		41,369		—		—		41,369
Total	$	97,994	$	56,625	$	—	$	41,369

            The following table presents our ARS which were measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as defined in Statement 157 as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

		Twelve Months Ended December 31,
			2008			2007
Beginning Balance Short-Term Investments	$		—		$	—
Purchases			65,075			—
Proceeds from Sales / Redemptions			(10,518	)		—
Gross realized gains on sales			968			—
Other Than Temporary Impairments (included in    non-operating income)			(13,661	)		—
Temporary Changes in Market Value (included in   other comprehensive income)			(495	)		—
Ending Balance Short-Term Investments	$		41,369		$	—

We determine the cost basis for our ARS sold using the specific identification method.

            Following the completion of the tender offer in August 2008 for our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023, $68.5 million aggregate principal of our convertible notes remains outstanding.  Additionally, as provided in the amended indenture governing the notes, such notes have become our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.  In accordance with EITF 96-19 “Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments,” we accounted for this exchange as an extinguishment of debt, since the net present value of the cash flows under the exchanged terms was more than 10% of the net present value of the cash flows under the terms of the original instrument.  As required by accounting rules, we recorded the convertible notes to a fair value of $40.7 million, net of a debt discount of $27.8 million that will be amortized over the life of the new instrument up to the first date at which we may be required to repurchase the notes in August 2011.  Such adjustment was recorded as a non-recurring gain under non-operating income in 2008.  The net balance of the 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 as of December 31, 2008 was $39.7 million. 

            We estimated fair value of our convertible notes based on an average of market trading activity for the convertible notes subsequent to the exchange in August 2008.

            Liabilities that we measure at fair value on a non-recurring basis are shown below (in thousands):

				Fair Value Measurements Using
Description		August 2, 2008		Quoted Priced in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Gains
11.25% Convertible Secured   Notes due 2023	$	68.5	$	—	$	40.7	$	—	$	27.8

Note 6 –– Investments in Other Entities

            Investments in unconsolidated companies are accounted for by the equity method of accounting when we have significant influence over the operation of the companies as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18 – “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock” (“ABP 18”).  The following table details our current non-controlling interests that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting:

		Carrying Amount of Investment at December 31, (in millions)
Company		2008	2007
Wing Holdings, LLC (“Wing”)	$	—	6.5
Flight Services and Systems, Inc. (“FSS”)		1.6	3.3

            We purchased a 49% interest in Wing for $16.0 million in June 2005.  The carrying amount of our investment exceeded the amount of the company’s underlying equity by approximately $8.5 million at the time of our investment.  We evaluated the net book value of the company’s fixed assets as of June 30, 2005 and identified approximately a $1.9 million difference between net book value and fair value.  The majority of the difference is being amortized over the remaining average life of the assets identified.  During fourth quarter 2007, we evaluated and determined that the carrying value of our investment in Wing was other-than-temporarily impaired due to continuing net losses through 2007 and the projections of growth were no longer as aggressive as anticipated when we purchased this entity.  Therefore, we recognized an impairment charge of $7.0 million comprised primarily of the inherent goodwill.  During the second quarter of 2008, we impaired the remaining investment balance in Wing due to continuing losses.  Additionally, on July 18, 2008, we received notification that Wing was closing their main facility which represents approximately 64% of projected revenues.  These impairment charges were recognized as decreases to our investment balance and the corresponding equity losses are presented in the line “Impairment charges on investments” in our consolidated statements of operations.

            In January 2006, we purchased a 44% interest in FSS for $3 million.  At the same time, we loaned FSS $1 million which was originally classified in Other Assets, net, on the consolidated balance sheet.  The note was due and payable in full on September 30, 2007, and provided that interest was due and payable quarterly on the 15th day following the close of each calendar quarter.  The note provided that if International Total Services, Inc. (“ITS”) (also owned by the non-ExpressJet owners of FSS) emerged from bankruptcy and FSS could utilize ITS’s federal income tax attributes through a transaction or series of transactions, then any unpaid balance of the note would be deemed paid in full as a contribution by us to the capital of FSS.  The loan interest rate was equal to the lesser of 7% per annum or the three-month LIBOR plus 150 basis points.  In 2008, we determined that FSS had satisfied its obligation on the note and we reclassified it from “Other Assets, net” to “Investments in Other Entities” on our consolidated balance sheets.  As of December 31, 2008, we evaluated and determined that the carrying value of our investment in FSS was other-than-temporarily impaired due to our decision to fully reserve for the value of FSS’s share of ITS’s federal income tax attributes due to the uncertainty of their ultimate realizability.  As such, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.6 million in 2008.  This impairment charge was recognized as a decrease to our investment balance and corresponding equity loss presented in the line “Impairment charges on investments” in our consolidated statements of operations.

            Our proportionate shares of the results of operations from these entities are included in the line “Equity investment income (loss), net” on our consolidated statements of operations. 

Note 7 –– Details of Certain Accounts

            Accrued other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

		As of December 31,
		2008		2007
Flight operation related expenses	$	5,521	$	10,396
Marketing		1,619		10,000
Interest		2,726		2,530
Other		10,571		6,707
	$	20,437	$	29,633

            Other long-term liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

		As of December 31,
		2008		2007
Spare parts credit	$	219	$	2,852
Flight training credits		—		4,946
Other		1,531		1,702
	$	1,750	$	9,500

Note 8 –– Leases

Under the Amended Continental CPA, Continental will be responsible for paying aircraft rent on all aircraft covered by such agreement, therefore, these items are not included in our statements of operations for periods after June 30, 2008.  Under the original CPA we leased or subleased all our aircraft under operating leases with lease terms ranging from 16 to 16.5 years from Continental at the same terms as the lease agreements between Continental and the third-party lessors.  Therefore, the 214 aircraft operating under the Amended Continental CPA are excluded from the table below as we no longer have future minimum lease commitments related to these aircraft.  Lease payments relating to the 30 aircraft removed from the Continental CPA are at reduced rental rates. This rate decrease is reflected in the tables below.  Rental payments for each aircraft are fixed upon lease execution with no escalation clauses. 

            We also lease or sublease, under various operating leases, ground equipment and substantially all of our ground facilities, including facilities at public airports from Continental or the municipalities or agencies owning and controlling such airports.  Though the duration and terms of these leases vary greatly, we expect, in most cases, leases to be renewed or replaced by new leases as required in the normal course of business.  Our leases do not include residual value guarantees.

            As of December 31, 2008, the scheduled future minimum lease payments under capital leases due to third-party lessors and the scheduled future minimum lease payments under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows (in millions):

		Operating Leases
		30 Aircraft		Non- Aircraft		Totals
Year ending December 31, 2009	$	21.9	$	14.2	$	36.1
2010		21.9		9.7		31.6
2011		21.9		9.3		31.2
2012		21.9		9.3		31.2
2013		21.9		8.9		30.8
Later years		32.8		37.5		70.3
Total minimum lease payments	$	142.3	$	88.9	$	231.2

            Amortization of capital leases is included with depreciation expense as disclosed in the financial statements.

            Total rent expense was approximately $236.1 million, $400.4 million and $377.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which includes non-aircraft rent expense of approximately $39.0 million, $56.2 million and $45.0 million.   Under subleases or leases within the Continental CPA, total rent expense was $145.0 million, $277.2 million and $349.5 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  Under subleases with Continental, total rental expense was $189.5 million, $326.6 million and $315.1 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. 

            If we defaulted on our payment obligations under our aircraft and facility leases or subleases with Continental, Continental would be entitled to reduce future payments to us under the Continental CPA by the amount of the defaulted payment. 

Note 9 –– Long-term Debt

As of December 31, 2008, long-term debt, including current maturities, totaled $49.0 million (net of discount of $21.1 million), which consisted of our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 and the EDC Loans. 

            In July 2003, we completed an offering of $137.2 million aggregate principal amount of Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 with interest payable semi-annually.  Holders of this debt had the right to require that we repurchase their notes on August 1, 2008, 2013 and 2018 (“Repurchase Dates”) at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.  On August 1, 2008, holders of our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 had the right to require us to repurchase their notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest.  Under the indenture governing the convertible notes, we were able to satisfy the obligation with either cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares.  During 2008, we took the following actions after consulting with our independent financial advisors:

•  Received stockholders approval for two proposals that provided us greater flexibility in satisfying our repurchase obligations with respect to the Original 4.25% Convertible Notes, which included the ability to issue such number of shares of our common stock as necessary to repurchase all outstanding convertible notes that were tendered on August 1, 2008, and increased our authorized common stock from 200 million shares to 400 million shares;

•  Commenced our repurchase offer for the Original 4.25% Convertible Notes and provided written notice to the trustee of our intention to pay the repurchase price wholly in shares of our common stock;

•  Unilaterally amended the indenture governing the notes to increase the coupon from 4.25% to 11.25% over the remaining note term, to provide security based on a pro-rata amount of collateral and to provide for an additional Repurchase Date on August 1, 2011, in order to provide improved terms and additional flexibility for the noteholders; and

•  Issued 16.4 million shares (Reverse Split adjusted) of our common stock in payment of the repurchase price for the $59.7 million principal amount of the notes validly tendered and to settle accrued and unpaid interest due August 1, 2008.  Because the common stock was issued in exchange for the Original 4.25% Convertible Notes exclusively with the existing holders of the notes, and no commission or other compensation was paid in soliciting the exchange, the securities are exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.

            Following the completion of the tender offer in August 2008 for our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023, $68.5 million aggregate principal of our convertible notes remains outstanding.  Additionally, as provided in the amended indenture governing the notes, such notes have become our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023.  In accordance with EITF 96-19 “Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments,” we accounted for this exchange as an extinguishment of debt, since the net present value of the cash flows under the exchanged terms was more than 10% of the net present value of the cash flows under the terms of the original instrument.  As required by accounting rules, we recorded the convertible notes to a fair value of $40.7 million, net of a debt discount of $27.8 million that will be amortized over the life of the new instrument up to the first date at which we may be required to repurchase the notes in August 2011.  Such adjustment was recorded as a non-recurring gain under non-operating income for 2008.  The net balance of the 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 as of December 31, 2008 was $39.7 million.

            We estimated fair value of our convertible notes based on an average of market trading activity for the convertible notes subsequent to the exchange in August 2008.

            Other than the convertible notes, we do not have any material long-term borrowings or available lines of credit.  Pursuant to the terms of the amended indenture governing the 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023, we granted a security interest, with a pro-rata portion, (based on the portion that the remaining notes represent of the total convertible notes that were issued) of assets with an appraised value of approximately $181 million, including approximately $96 million in spare parts and $85 million of spare engines.  Based on the principal amount of notes remaining outstanding on August 2, 2008, the pledged collateral for the notes totals approximately $51.5 million in spare parts and $45.3 million in spare engines.  We agreed that we will not as of any fiscal year end permit the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Notes divided by the fair market value of the pledged collateral to be greater than certain percentages.  If such collateral ratios are greater than the applicable maximum, we will pledge additional spare parts, spare aircraft engines and / or cash and cash equivalents.  Pursuant to the terms of the amended indenture, we are required to deliver a certificate from our appraiser dated not later than 15 business days after January 1 of each year certifying the value as of January 1 or such later date.  We delivered such certificate from our appraiser in January 2009 and the appraised values of $180.4 million have not changed materially from the initial appraisal of $181 million at the amendment date.

            The notes are guaranteed by Airlines.  Except as otherwise specified in the indenture pursuant to which the notes were issued, there are no restrictions on Airlines’ ability to transfer funds to Holdings in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.  General provisions of applicable state law, however, may limit the ability of any subsidiary to pay dividends or make distributions to its parent in certain circumstances. 

            If we elect to use shares of common stock to repurchase any notes, the number of shares will be equal to the repurchase price divided by 97.5% of the average closing sales price of our common stock for the five consecutive trading days ending on the third business day prior to the applicable Repurchase Date (adjusted to take into account the occurrence of certain events that would require adjustment of the conversion rate). In certain circumstances, the notes were convertible into our common stock, at a ratio of 54.9451 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which was equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $18.20 per common share; however, following our Reverse Split the ratio is now 5.49451, which is equivalent to a price of approximately $182.00 per common share.  The ratio is subject to adjustments if certain events take place, and holders may convert only if the closing sale price per common share exceeds 120% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter.

            In 2008 we purchased $6.5 million of our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 and $7.6 million par value (book value of $4.5 million) of our 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 for $10.8 million resulting in a net realized gain of $.2 million.   Subsequent to these repurchases our interest expense related to the debt discount will be $8.2 million annually through August 2011.

            As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we estimated the fair value of our $60.8 million and $134.7 million (carrying value) fixed-rate debt to be $38.9 million and $130.7 million, respectively, based upon quoted market prices.  In addition, we made interest payments of $4.7 million and $5.8 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. 

            The following table presents the changes in our convertible notes (in millions):

		Twelve Months Ended December 31,
		2008			2007
Beginning Balance in convertible notes	$	134.7		$	137.2
Repurchases		(11.1	)		(2.5	)
Convertible notes converted to equity		(59.7	)		—
Gain from debt discount		(27.8	)		—
Amortization of debt discount		3.6			—
Ending Balance in convertible notes	$	39.7		$	134.7

            The EDC Loans consist of $10.7 million loaned to us in May 2003 and $6.6 million loaned to us in September 2003.  The EDC Loans are secured by certain of our flight simulators, flight data software and other equipment related to the simulators.  We used all the proceeds from the EDC Loans to reduce the principal under a note we had issued to Continental.  The amount due to EDC accrues interest at the six-month LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum.  Each of the EDC Loans has a term of 96 months and each contains customary representations, warranties and covenants.  Additionally, Continental is the guarantor of the EDC Loans, and a default under the guarantee would cause an acceleration of the loan.

            The amount of all scheduled debt maturities, due over the next five years and thereafter is as follows (in millions):

Year ending December 31,
2009	$	3.5
2010	$	3.5
2011	$	63.2
2012	$	—
2013	$	—
Thereafter	$	—

            The table above assumes the 11.25% Convertible Secured Notes due 2023 will be due on August 1, 2011, the earliest date that the holders of the notes may require us to repurchase the notes.

            Other than the debt obligations described above, we do not have any other source of long-term borrowings or available lines of credit. 

            The following condensed consolidating balance sheets, results of operations and cash flows present separately the financial position of the parent issuer, Holdings, the subsidiary guarantor, Airlines, and all other non-guarantor subsidiaries of Holdings on a combined basis.

		Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet December 31, 2008 (In thousands)
		Holdings			Airlines			Other Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated Totals
Current assets	$	—		$	153,182		$	8,549	$	—		$	161,731
Property and equipment, net		108			207,257			13,555		—			220,920
Investments in other entities		1,600			—			—		—			1,600
Other assets		1,722			4,666			2,206		(3,956	)		4,638
Total assets	$	3,430		$	365,105		$	24,310	$	(3,956	)	$	388,889
Current liabilities		2,662			91,562			2,048		—			96,272
Intercompany payables (receivables)		(338,432	)		332,187			6,245		—			—
Long-term debt		39,740			5,848			—		—			45,588
Other liabilities		3,840			44,672			12		(3,956	)		44,568
Stockholders’ equity		295,620			(109,164	)		16,005		—			202,461
Total liabilities and stockholders’   equity	$	3,430		$	365,105		$	24,310	$	(3,956)		$	388,889

		Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet December 31, 2007 (In thousands)
		Holdings			Airlines			Other Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated Totals
Current assets	$	—		$	296,348		$	6,036		$	—	$	302,384
Property and equipment, net		112			248,720			14,866			—		263,698
Investments in other entities		3,254			—			6,459			—		9,713
Other assets		15,760			5,907			146			—		21,813
Total assets	$	19,126		$	550,975		$	27,507		$	—	$	597,608
Current liabilities		137,122			158,557			1,005			—		296,684
Intercompany payables (receivables)		(332,112	)		326,233			5,879			—		—
Long-term debt		—			9,308			14			—		9,322
Other liabilities		(5,838	)		66,992			(1,992	)		—		59,162
Stockholders’ equity		219,954			(10,115	)		22,601			—		232,440
Total liabilities and stockholders’   equity	$	19,126		$	550,975		$	27,507		$	—	$	597,608

		Condensed Consolidating Results of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2008 (In thousands)
		Holdings			Airlines			Other Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated Totals
Operating revenue	$	—		$	1,306,430		$	18,743		$	(6,960	)	$	1,318,213
Operating expenses		985			1,420,074			20,569			(6,960	)		1,434,668
Operating income / (loss)		(985	)		(113,644	)		(1,826	)		—			(116,455	)
Gain from debt discount		27,785			—			—			—			27,785
Settlement of fuel contracts		—			23,149			—			—			23,149
Impairment charges on investments		(2,591	)		(13,661	)		(5,231	)		—			(21,483	)
Amortization of debt discount		(3,589	)		—			—			—			(3,589	)
Interest expense		(8,428	)		(18,459	)		(14	)		17,829			(9,072	)
Interest income		17,829			5,831			—			(17,829	)		5,831
Capitalized interest		—			791			—			—			791
Equity investment income / (loss)		(63	)		—			(1,228	)		—			(1,291	)
Other, net		138			2,177			(773	)		—			1,542
Income / (loss) before income taxes		30,096			(113,816	)		(9,072	)					(92,792	)
Income tax benefit / (expense)		(12,628	)		14,747			2,478			—			4,597
Net income / (loss)	$	17,468		$	(99,069	)	$	(6,594	)	$	—		$	(88,195	)

		Condensed Consolidating Results of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2007 (In thousands)
		Holdings			Airlines			Other Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated Totals
Operating revenue	$	—		$	1,676,905		$	16,164		$	(7,524	)	$	1,685,545
Operating expenses		1,121			1,777,668			21,192			(7,565	)		1,792,416
Operating income / (loss)		(1,121	)		(100,763	)		(5,028	)		41			(106,871	)
Impairment charges on investments		—			—			(7,000	)		—			(7,000	)
Interest expense		(7,358	)		(18,944	)		(2	)		17,808			(8,496	)
Interest income		17,934			15,659			—			(17,849	)		15,744
Capitalized interest		—			1,330			—			—			1,330
Equity investment income / (loss)		61			—			(1,365	)		—			(1,304	)
Other, net		83			(146	)		(212	)		—			(275	)
Income / (loss) before income taxes		9,599			(102,864	)		(13,607	)					(106,872	)
Income tax benefit / (expense)		(3,352	)		35,887			4,089			—			36,624
Net income / (loss)	$	6,247		$	(66,977	)	$	(9,518	)	$	—		$	(70,248	)

		Condensed Consolidating Results of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2006 (In thousands)
		Holdings			Airlines			Other Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated Totals
Operating revenue	$	—		$	1,676,846		$	9,542		$	(4,232	)	$	1,682,156
Operating expenses		1,985			1,532,360			10,972			(4,232	)		1,541,085
Operating income / (loss)		(1,985	)		144,486			(1,430	)		—			141,071
Interest expense		(5,913	)		(19,225	)		(5	)		17,808			(7,335	)
Interest income		18,029			14,444			—			(17,808	)		14,665
Capitalized interest		—			294			—			—			294
Equity investment income / (loss)		194			—			(2,230	)		—			(2,036	)
Other, net		—			153			(356	)		—			(203	)
Income / (loss) before income taxes		10,325			140,152			(4,021	)		—			146,456
Income tax benefit / (expense)		(3,675	)		(50,764	)		548			—			(53,891	)
Net income / (loss)	$	6,650		$	89,388		$	(3,473	)	$	—		$	92,565

		Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows Year Ended December 31, 2008 (In thousands)
		Holdings		Airlines			Other Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated Totals
Operating activities	$	—	$	(56,533	)	$	(842	)	$	1,283		$	(56,092	)
Investing activities		—		(54,995	)		(7	)		—			(55,002	)
Financing activities		—		(20,634	)		1,280			(1,283	)		(20,637	)
Net increase / (decrease) in cash		—		(132,162	)		431			—			(131,731	)
Cash at the beginning of the period		—		188,834			425			—			189,259
Cash at the end of the period	$	—	$	56,672		$	856		$	—		$	57,528

		Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows Year Ended December 31, 2007 (In thousands)
		Holdings		Airlines			Other Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated Totals
Operating activities	$	—	$	(38,912	)	$	(1,018	)	$	—		$	(39,930	)
Investing activities		—		(54,275	)		(29	)		1,021			(53,283	)
Financing activities		—		(9,126	)		986			(1,021	)		(9,161	)
Net increase / (decrease) in cash		—		(102,313	)		(61	)		—			(102,374	)
Cash at the beginning of the   period		—		291,148			485			—			291,633
Cash at the end of the period	$	—	$	188,835		$	424		$	—		$	189,259

		Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows Year Ended December 31, 2006 (In thousands)
		Holdings			Airlines			Other Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated Totals
Operating activities	$	—		$	117,258		$	(232	)	$	1,686		$	118,712
Investing activities		(4,500	)		(24,355	)		(4,679	)		(2,034	)		(35,568	)
Financing activities		(4,992	)		(19,424	)		5,272			348			(18,796	)
Net increase / (decrease) in cash		(9,492	)		73,479			361			—			64,348
Cash at the beginning of the period		9,492			217,669			124			—			227,285
Cash at the end of the period	$	—		$	291,148		$	485		$	—		$	291,633

Note 10 –– Income Taxes 

            Income tax benefit / (expense) for the years ended December 2008, 2007 and 2006 consisted of the following (in millions):

		2008			2007			2006
Federal
Current	$	(2.7	)	$	33.0		$	(50.1	)
Deferred		6.9			(0.8	)		(2.2	)
State:
Current		0.5			0.4			0.2
Deferred		(0.1	)		4.0			(1.8	)
Income Tax Benefit / (Expense)	$	4.6		$	36.6		$	(53.9	)

            The reconciliations of income tax computed at the United States federal statutory tax rates to income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

		Amount								Percentage
		2008			2007			2006		2008		2007		2006
		(in millions)
Income tax benefit / (expense) at United   States statutory rates	$	32.5		$	37.4		$	(51.3	)	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
State income tax benefit / (expense) (net   of federal benefit)		2.2			2.0			(1.2	)	2.4		1.9		0.8
Valuation allowance for net operating loss   carryforward limitation		(23.1	)		—			—		(25.0	)	—		—
Valuation allowance for unusable capital   losses		(4.7	)		—			—		(5.1	)	—		—
Meals and entertainment disallowance		(1.2	)		(1.9	)		(1.6	)	(1.3	)	(1.8	)	1.1
Other		(1.1	)		(0.9	)		0.2		(1.0	)	(0.9	)	(0.1	)
Income tax benefit / (expense), net	$	4.6		$	36.6		$	(53.9	)	5.0	%	34.2	%	36.8	%

            Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the related amounts used for income tax purposes.  Significant components of our deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in millions):

		2008			2007
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Fixed assets	$	40.1		$	46.9
Other		2.7			2.7
Gross deferred tax liabilities	$	42.8		$	49.6
Deferred Tax Assets:
International loss carryforwards	$	1.8		$	1.2
Federal loss carryforwards		38.0			4.6
Federal minimum tax credit carryforward		14.3			14.0
State loss carryforwards		14.0			10.9
Intangible assets		246.0			267.0
Other		26.8			15.3
Gross deferred tax assets	$	340.9		$	313.0
Valuation allowance / net tax agreement obligation   to Continental		340.9			313.1
Net deferred tax liabilities	$	(42.8	)	$	(49.7	)

            The tender offer and partial redemption in August 2008 of the 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 caused Holdings to trigger a change in ownership limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code in August 2008.  Section 382 limits a taxpayer's ability to utilize certain carryover tax attributes after a substantial cumulative change in ownership of their stock.  The regulation mandates a three-year “look back” requiring Holdings to evaluate its position related to Section 382 beginning in 2005.  The results of the look back analysis indicated that Holdings triggered Section 382 changes in ownership in April 2005 and in August 2008.  The April 2005 change resulted in an after tax charge of $1.6 million primarily related to interest on the timing of certain tax obligations. Due to the decrease in our market capitalization, the Section 382 change triggered in August 2008 resulted in our conclusion that it was more likely than not that we would not be able to utilize our deferred tax assets due to this limitation and therefore we recorded an increase of $19.3 million to the valuation allowance.  We recorded the effects of this adjustment in 2008 as any impact to previously reported financial statements was not deemed to be material.

            Also during 2008 we recorded $8.5 million in income tax expense to record a valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets related to capital losses and, international and state tax net operating losses as it was concluded more likely than not that adequate income would not be generated to utilize these deferred tax assets based on their characterization and/or carryforward period.

            See the table below for expiration dates of our tax attribute loss carryforwards (in millions):

		December 31, 2008	Statutory Carryforward Period	Expiration Year(s)
Net Operating Carryforwards
Federal Loss	$	38.0	20	2020 to 2028
Federal Credit	$	14.3	No expiration	N/A
State Loss	$	14.0	5 to 20	2009 to 2028
International Loss	$	1.8	10	2016 to 2018

            In conjunction with our initial public offering in April 2002, the tax basis of our tangible and intangible assets was adjusted to fair value.  This adjustment to tax basis should result in additional tax deductions being available to us through 2017.  In October 2006, Continental entered into a final settlement agreement with the IRS that included periods during which we were included in its consolidated federal income tax return.  Our taxable income was not adjusted, but the amount of net operating losses allocated to us was increased by approximately $31.2 million.  In accordance with our tax agreement with Continental, to the extent we generate taxable income sufficient to realize the additional tax deductions and tax attributes allocated to us, we are required to pay Continental a percentage of the amount of tax savings actually realized, excluding the effect of any loss carrybacks.  We are required to pay Continental 100% of the first third of the anticipated tax benefit, 90% of the second third and 80% of the last third.  However, if the tax benefits are not realized by the end of 2018, we will be obligated to pay Continental 100% of any benefit realized after that date.  Since these payments are solely dependent on our ability to generate sufficient taxable income to realize these deferred tax assets, they are recorded as an obligation to Continental within the deferred tax asset accounts, and the portion we may retain in the future is offset by a valuation allowance. 

            At the time of the initial public offering, the valuation allowance and the obligation to Continental offset the step-up in basis of assets in our long-term deferred tax asset account.  There were no payments made to Continental under the tax agreement during 2008 and 2007.  We made approximately $24.8 million and $25.3 million of net payments to Continental under the tax agreement related to the additional tax deductions during 2006 and 2005, respectively.  Because of the April 2005 Section 382 change in ownership, our ability to utilize some of the tax attributes flowing from Continental has been limited.  Our losses in 2007 and 2008 carryback to offset the tax shortfall, but result in an interest charge recorded in current tax expense and discussed above.  Our August 2008 Section 382 ownership change limits our ability to realize the gross deferred tax assets recorded at December 31, 2008.  Federal and many state net operating loss carryovers are subject to substantial annual limitations over their remaining life, while our federal regular tax deductions for our tax amortizable intangible assets are limited for the five year period after this ownership change.  We are currently assessing the impact of this limitation including any amounts that may be owed from Continental to the Company.  If amounts are recoverable from Continental, it may decrease the valuation allowance recorded as of December 31, 2008.

            Our tax agreement increases our dependence on Continental’s financial condition.  If it is determined that any of the tax benefits related to the basis increase should not have been available at the time of utilization and, as a result, we are required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties, then we could be adversely affected if Continental were unable to indemnify us under the agreement.

            Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements if a position is more likely than not of being sustained by a taxing authority.  We classify interest and penalties on tax deficiencies as charges to income tax expense.  For the year ended December 31, 2008 we recorded a net interest charge of $1.6 million to income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.  As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no material unrecognized tax benefits or associated accrued interest and penalties under FIN 48.  The calendar tax years 2003 through 2007 remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. 

Note 11 – Earnings / (Loss) Per Share

            We account for earnings per share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128 — “Earnings per Share.” Basic earnings per common share (“Basic EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented.  Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other obligations to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company.  As discussed below under “Reverse Stock Split,” our stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis when the market opened on October 2, 2008.  As required per SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 4C, “Changes in Capital Structure”, the computation of basic and diluted loss per share has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split for all periods presented in our consolidated statements of operations. 

            The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of Basic EPS to the numerator and denominator of Diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

		Year ended December 31,
		2008			2007			2006
Numerator:
Net income / (loss)	$	(88,195	)	$	(70,248	)	$	92,565
Income impact of assumed conversion of convertible   debt		—			—			3,662
	$	(88,195	)	$	(70,248	)	$	96,227
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		11,265			5,369			5,386
Effect of stock options		—			—			—
Effect of restricted stock		—			—			13
Assumed conversion of convertible debt		—			—			754
		11,265			5,369			6,153
Basic earnings / (loss) per share	$	(7.83	)	$	(13.08	)	$	17.18
Diluted earnings / (loss) per share	$	(7.83	)	$	(13.08	)	$	15.64

            We excluded 55,886 and 60,849 shares of restricted stock from the weighted average shares used in computing Basic EPS for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, as these shares were not vested as of these dates.

            Weighted average common shares outstanding for the Diluted EPS calculation also include the incremental effect of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and restricted stock not yet vested.  We excluded the following common stock equivalents from our Diluted EPS calculations, because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:

•  options to purchase 0.4 million, 0.4 million and 0.2 million shares of our common stock for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, these options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the respective periods; and

•  0.3 million, 0.7 million and 0.8 million shares of common stock equivalents for the assumed conversion of convertible debt for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

            As a result of our tender offer with respect to our Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023, we issued 16.4 million shares (Reverse Split adjusted) of our common stock in payment for the $59.7 million principal amount of the notes validly tendered and to settle accrued and unpaid interest that was due August 1, 2008.

            Reverse Stock Split.  On October 1, 2008, at a special meeting of our stockholders, we received stockholder approval for a proposal to effect a one-for-ten reverse split of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share.  The approved proposal also reduced the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock from 400,000,000 to 150,000,000.  The Reverse Split became effective on October 2, 2008. 

            The Reverse Split was part of our continuing efforts to return to trading on all New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Group platforms.  In addition, the reverse split was a step to allow us to return to compliance with the continued listing standard of the NYSE on January 20, 2009.  As a result of the Reverse Split, each 10 shares of our common stock was combined into and automatically became one share of our common stock which began trading on a split-adjusted basis when the market opened on October 2, 2008, with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares.  The reverse split affected all shares of our common stock and stock options outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Reverse Split.  The Certificate of Amendment did not change the par value of our common stock, which remains at $0.01 per share. 

            Each stockholder’s percentage ownership in the Company and proportional voting power remains unchanged after the reverse split except for minor changes and adjustments resulting from fractional shares. The rights and privileges of stockholders were substantially unaffected by the Reverse Split.

            The Reverse Split which began trading on a split-adjusted basis when the market opened on October 2, 2008 is currently reflected in all share information presented in these financial statements.

Note 12 –– Preferred, Common and Treasury Stock

            Preferred Stock.  We have 10 million shares of authorized preferred stock, par value $0.1 per share. 

            Common Stock.  We currently have one class of common stock, par value $.01 per share, with22.0 million shares issued and 17.7 million shares outstanding.  Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote.  Common stockholders would participate ratably in any dividends or distributions on the common stock. 

            Treasury Stock.  In July 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the expenditure of up to $30 million to repurchase shares of our common stock.  Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Board authorized an additional $15 million for this program.  Purchases have been made from time to time in the open market; the timing of any share repurchases under the program depends on a variety of factors, including market conditions, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time.  We account for our common stock repurchases using the cost method such that when shares are reissued, proceeds in excess of cost are charged to additional paid-in capital and any deficiency is charged to accumulated earnings.  Cost is determined using a weighted average price.  Common stock acquired through the program is available for general corporate purposes.  As of December 31, 2008, we had a balance of $10.1 million remaining within the program for additional purchases.  As discussed In Note 11 – “Earnings / (Loss) Per Share”,stockholders approved to effect a Reverse Split of our common stock in 2008.

            The following table details annual activity under the share repurchase program (Reverse Split adjusted):

	Shares Repurchased (in thousands)		Average Cost per Share Excluding Commissions
2008	4,035	$	1.91
2007	270	$	29.23
2006	—	$	—
2005	59	$	95.12

            Shares forfeited under our stock based compensation plans are held as treasury stock, which can be used to issue new restricted stock and to satisfy any exercises of stock options. 

Note 13 –– Stock-Based Compensation Plans

As of December 31, 2008, we had three stock-based compensation plans: the ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. 2002 and 2007 Stock Incentive Plans (the “Incentive Plans”) and the ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”).  These Incentive Plans provide that we may grant awards in the form of stock options or restricted stock to our non-employee directors, our employees or employees of our subsidiaries. The 2007 Incentive Plan also provides that we may grant awards in the form of performance units, stock appreciation rights, or any other right, interest or option related to shares or other property, including cash. The aggregate number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the Incentive Plans may not exceed 3.2 million shares, subject to adjustments as provided in these Incentive Plans.  We have reserved 3.2 million shares of our common stock for issuance under this plan.  Options granted under these Incentive Plans have been awarded with exercise prices equaling the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, vest over a four-year period for employees or a six-month period for non-employee directors and expire seven years after the date of grant in the case of employees and ten years after the date of grant in the case of directors. 

The fair value of Holdings’ options granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires us to make several assumptions.  The table below summarizes the weighted-average of these assumptions for the year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:

	2008		2007		2006
Risk-free interest rate	2.3	%	4.7	%	4.9	%
Dividend yield	—		—		—
Expected market price volatility of our common   stock	66.4	%	49.3	%	50.5	%
Expected life of options (years)	9.5		7.0		7.0

            The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect for the expected term of the option at the time of grant.  The dividend yield on our common stock is assumed to be zero since we do not pay dividends and have no current plans to pay them in the future.  The market price volatility of our common stock was based on historical volatility since April 23, 2002, the date of our initial public offering.  Our methodology is consistent with prior period volatility assumptions. The expected life of the options is based upon our anticipated expectations of exercise behavior since no options have been exercised since our initial public offering to provide relevant historical data.  

            Based upon the assumptions above, the weighted-average fair value of the options granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was determined to be $5.03, $3.48 and $3.23.  

Options	Shares (in thousands)			Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2008	475		$	88.07	—	$	—
Granted	26			7.88	—		—
Exercised	—			—	—		—
Forfeited or Expired	(64	)		102.20	—		—
Outstanding as of December 31, 2008	437		$	81.22	4.64	$	0.00
Exercisable as of December 31, 2008	236		$	103.81	3.77	$	0.00

A summary of the status of our unvested shares of restricted stock as of December 31, 2007, and changes during the 12-months ended December 31, 2008, is presented below:

Unvested Shares	Shares (in thousands)			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2008	57		$	68.57	$	1,411
Granted	102			14.22		—
Vested	(54	)		46.01		516
Forfeited	(10	)		33.15		—
Outstanding as of December 31, 2008	95		$	26.76	$	162

As of December 31, 2008, there was $2.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.  Compensation cost recognized for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $5.4 million, $5.7 million and $2.7 million respectively.

            On May 7, 2003, our stockholders approved the ESPP, which authorized the sale of up to one million pre-split shares of our common stock.  We have reserved 100,000 Reverse Split adjusted shares of our common stock for issuance under the ESPP.  Under the plan, all of our employees are eligible to purchase shares of our common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first or last day of the semi-annual purchase period.  Our first purchase period began on July 1, 2003.  Employees may sell shares obtained under the ESPP six months after the end of the plan period in which the shares were purchased.  During 2008 and 2007, 59,368 and 8,349 Reverse Split adjusted shares, respectively, of our common stock were issued to our employees at prices ranging from $4.68 to $21.08 in 2008 and prices ranging from $51.26 to $60.18 in 2007

            The fair value of the purchase rights under the ESPP was also estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively:

ESPP		2008			2007			2006
Risk-free interest rate		3.3	%		5.1	%		4.7	%
Dividend yield		—			—			—
Expected market price volatility of our common stock		65.9	%		50.8	%		53.2	%
Expected life of purchase rights (months)		6			6			6
Weighted average fair value of each purchase right granted	$	0.18		$	1.17		$	2.31

            In November 4, 2005, our Board of Directors approved accelerating the vesting of 669,750 unvested options currently held by employees, including executive officers, with exercise prices greater than $11.00 per share and extended the term of 868,500 employee options that had five-year terms to seven years.  These options were and remain out of the money, and the acceleration and extension were effective immediately.  No options held by non-employee directors were subject to acceleration or extension.  The acceleration of vesting reduces compensation expense upon the adoption of SFAS 123R.

Note 14 –– Employee Benefit Plans

            Effective December 31, 2002, the ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (“401(k) Plan”) was adopted.  Substantially all our domestic employees are covered by this plan. 

            Effective October 1, 2004 for Airlines’ mechanics, who are represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, and January 1, 2005 for all other employees, the 401(k) Plan was amended.  Under the amended plan, we offer the following benefits:

•  a service-based retirement match depending on the years of service from 4.0% up to 6.0% of pay per person, which vests over five years; and 

•  a service-based retirement contribution depending on years of service and the terms of the collective bargaining agreements, as applicable.  Effective January 1, 2007, the retirement contribution vesting terms changed from a five-year cliff vesting schedule to a 5-year graded vesting schedule. 

            For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, our total expense for the defined contribution plan was $19.4 million, $21.5 million and $19.5 million, respectively.

            Effective January 1, 2009, the 401(k) Plan was amended such that certain matches have been reduced or eliminated depending on the terms of the collective bargaining unit or work group, as applicable.

            The ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (the “Profit Sharing Plan”) was adopted effective January 1, 2002 and amended on February 17, 2005.  Under this plan, if Airlines achieves a 10% operating margin, the Profit Sharing Plan will pay out 5% of eligible base pay received during the year to our eligible employees, which excludes employees whose collective bargaining agreements provide otherwise and employees who participate in our management bonus program or any other bonus program designated by the Human Resources Committee of our Board.  Profit sharing expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $9.2 million.  Due to our consolidated net operating losses in 2008 and 2007, no profit sharing expense was recognized.  Effective January 1, 2009 the Profit Sharing Plan was amended to pay out 10% of pre-tax profits.

            Effective January 1, 2009, we rolled out an enhanced profit sharing plan (“Enhanced Profit Sharing Plan”) to all eligible employees.  The award pool under the Enhanced Profit Sharing Plan is 50% of pre-tax net income greater than $30 million.  The Enhanced Profit Sharing Plan is paid out before the Profit Sharing Plan.

            We also provide medical bridge coverage for employees between the ages of 60 to 65, with at least 10 years of service who have retired from the Company.  On December 31, 2006 we adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of Statement 158.  Statement 158 required the recognition of fund status (i.e., the difference between the fair value of plan assets and projected benefit obligations) of its defined benefit plan in the December 31, 2006 statement of financial position, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.  The adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the new unrecognized actuarial gain and unrecognized prior service costs.  

            In 2008, the plan to provide medical bridge coverage for non-pilot employees was frozen to not allow new retirees on or after January 1, 2009.  As a result, we recorded a reduction in our liability and a corresponding curtailment gain of $2.0 million.  The gain is reflected in the line item “Wages, salaries and related costs” in our consolidated statements of operations.

            In December 2007 President Bush signed the Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act (H.R. 4343) into law.  This law increased the mandatory retirement age of commercial pilots from 60 to 65.  As a result of this legislation we no longer are required to provide medical bridge coverage to our pilots between the ages of 60 to 65 and therefore, we have recorded a reduction in our liability and corresponding curtailment gain of $0.8 million.  Our liability for medical bridge coverage for employees as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively.

Note 15 –– Commitments and Contingencies

            Capacity Purchase Agreement.  See Note 2 – “Contract Flying” for further information regarding our capacity purchase agreement with Continental.

            Purchase Commitments.  As of December 31, 2008, we had options for 50 ERJ-145XR aircraft that may be exercised for other types of aircraft within the ERJ-145 Family.  Our next option exercise date is April 1, 2009.  If we do not exercise or extend our option as of this date, 25 options will expire.  During 2005, Continental declined the right to include any of these option aircraft in the Continental CPA.  We retain the right to exercise them and fly these aircraft for other airlines or under our own code, subject to some restrictions; however, we will have to finance our acquisition of these aircraft independently.  Currently, we do not have any firm commitments for aircraft purchases. 

            Prior to December 2005, under our power-by-the-hour agreement with Rolls Royce, we were obligated to acquire up to three spare engines to support our existing aircraft and the remaining eight aircraft on firm order.  In December 2005, we negotiated the sale of eight engines to Rolls Royce and, in exchange, entered into seven new engine leases with a Rolls Royce subsidiary.  The engines leased have greater interchangeability than the engines sold. As a result, we have satisfied our engine obligations and are no longer obligated to purchase the three engines.  These leases are classified as operating leases; hence they are not reflected as assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. 

            We also have other contractual obligations of approximately $0.8 billion under our power-by-the-hour contracts with various service providers.  The power-by-the-hour contracts dictate the method by which we pay a vendor based on our actual level of operations in exchange for vendor coverage on specific parts and equipment on our aircraft when those parts and equipment are in need of repair or replacement.  Each contract varies in term and payment procedure.  The estimated amount of our future commitment is based on assumptions related to future level of operations and forecasted payment rates.  Our level of operations, under the Continental CPA, is determined by Continental, which has exclusive scheduling authority over our fleet under the Continental CPA.  The level of operations inherent in the estimate is based on Continental’s most recent operating plan for us, which can be altered at Continental’s sole discretion and included operations for the 30 aircraft operating outside the Continental CPA.  Forecasted payment rates are based on actual rates as of December 31, 2008 and increased annually according to the particular inflation indices detailed in each contract.  Contractual rate increases at actual time of occurrence may be different than the forecasted rates.

            See a summary of all our contractual obligations in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Commitments – Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments.”

            General Guarantees and Indemnifications.  Pursuant to the Continental CPA, we indemnify Continental for certain of our actions and it indemnifies us for some of its actions. 

            Additionally, we are party to many contracts, in which it is common for us to agree to indemnify third parties for tort liabilities that arise out of or relate to the subject matter of the contract.  In some cases, this indemnity extends to related liabilities arising from the negligence of the indemnified parties, but typically excludes liabilities caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct.  We cannot estimate the potential amount of future payments under these indemnities until events arise that would trigger a liability under the indemnities.  However, we expect to be covered by insurance for a material portion of these liabilities, subject to deductibles, policy terms and condition.

            Employees.  As of December 31, 2008, approximately 77% of our employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements.  Our contracts with our pilots, dispatchers, flight attendants, and mechanics will be amendable in December 2010, July 2009, August 2010 and August 2009, respectively.  Our contract with our production workers does not have a term but salaries are typically renegotiated each year.  Our other employees are not covered by collective bargaining agreements.

            Legal Proceedings.  We are a defendant in various lawsuits and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.  While the outcome of these lawsuits and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, we do not believe that the ultimate disposition of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 16 – Related Party Transactions

            The following is a summary of significant related party transactions that occurred during the three years ended December 31, 2008, other than those discussed elsewhere in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

            Continental controls the scheduling, ticket prices and seat inventories with respect to Airlines’ operations under the Continental CPA.  In connection with this activity, Continental performs all sales and ticketing functions for Airlines on Continental ticket stock and receives cash directly from the sale of Airlines’ tickets.  Continental purchases or provides payment of certain items on our behalf, including, aircraft rent, fuel, certain payroll expenditures (including related benefits) and insurance, and charges us amounts as stipulated in the agreement.  In general, transfers or sales of assets between us and Continental are recorded at net book value.

            Continental provides various services to us and charges us amounts at rates in accordance with the Continental CPA and other agreements.  The services provided to us by Continental are as follows.

•  Certain customer services such as ground handling.  Charges related to these services were approximately $35.6 million, $67.6 million and $78.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

•  Centralized services and infrastructure costs, such as technology and some transaction processing.  Charges related to these services were approximately $2.4 million, $5.1 million and $8.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

            Under our amended master facility and ground handling agreement with Continental, rent expenses are allocated to us at the airport locations where Airlines operates.  Additionally, all terminal facility rents at the hub airports are now borne by Continental and Airlines pays for incremental rent at other Continental–managed locations unless Continental does not operate any aircraft there.  In these situations, Airlines is responsible for the rent expense.  At locations Airlines manages, rent is allocated between Continental and Airlines based on the number of respective passengers.  At common locations for Branded Flying and Continental, Airlines has agreed to allocate the cost of common items based on monthly departures.

            Revenue earned from Continental, including both the Continental CPA and our fixed rate ground handling revenue, was $1.0 billion, $1.4 billion and $1.7 billion for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

            We also have related-party transactions between us (including our subsidiaries) and our equity investees or Continental.  The following quantifies such activities:

•  During 2008, 2007 and 2006, InTech, a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings, reported sales to Continental totaling $1.7 million, $1.3 million, and $1.1 million respectively.

•  During 2008, 2007 and 2006, Wing, in which Holdings owns a non-controlling interest, provided approximately $0.1 million, $1.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively, worth of services to Airlines.

•  During 2008, 2007 and 2006, FSS, in which Holdings owns a non-controlling interest, provided no services to Airlines in 2008, $1.9 million, and $1.4 million, respectively, worth of services to Airlines.

            We had approximately $0.4 million, $1.2 million and $1.0 million of receivables from our employees as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  These receivables are related to uniforms, flight benefit charges and membership fees that are paid back to us through payroll deductions and do not include any of our officers. 

Note 17 – Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

            As discussed in Note 11 – “Earnings / (Loss) Per Share”, stockholders approved to effect a one-for-ten Reverse Split of our common stock.  All per share information in the following table has been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Split.  Unaudited summarized financial data by quarter for 2008 and 2007 is as follows (in millions, except per share data):

		March 31,			June 30,			September 30,			December 31,
2008
Operating revenue (5)	$	448.2		$	447.2		$	262.3		$	160.5
Operating income (loss) (1)		(35.0	)		(43.8	)		(29.0	)		(8.7	)
Non-operating income (loss), net (2)		(13.9	)		(4.9	)		48.5			(6.0	)
Net income (loss)		(31.3	)		(31.7	)		5.0			(30.2	)
Basic earnings per share (3)	$	(6.11	)	$	(6.18	)	$	0.32		$	(1.61	)
Diluted earnings per share (4)	$	(6.11	)	$	(6.18	)	$	0.32		$	(1.61	)
2007
Operating revenue	$	412.6		$	395.6		$	441.3		$	436.0
Operating income (loss)		14.3			(42.7	)		(36.7	)		(41.8	)
Non-operating income (loss), net		2.1			3.0			1.5			(6.6	)
Net income (loss)		10.2			(26.4	)		(22.3	)		(31.7	)
Basic earnings per share (1)	$	1.88		$	(4.89	)	$	(4.13	)	$	(6.01	)
Diluted earnings per share (2)	$	1.80		$	(4.89	)	$	(4.13	)	$	(6.01	)

(1)	Operating income (loss) includes $21.4 million of special charges made in the 2nd quarter of 2008 related to impairments of fixed assets and goodwill and $21.7 million of special charges incurred primarily in the 3rd quarter of 2008 for suspended operations.
(2)	Nonoperating (loss) includes $27.8 million gain from debt discount and settlement of fuel contracts of $23.1 million in the 3rd quarter of 2008.  In addition, there were $21.5 million of impairment charges on investments throughout 2008.
(3)	The sum of the individual quarterly earnings per share does not agree with year-to-date net income per share as each quarterly computation is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during that period.
(4)	See detailed reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of Basic EPS to the numerator and denominator of Diluted EPS at - Note 11 – “Earnings / (Loss) Per Share”
(5)	Reimbursable costs under the Continental CPA are recorded to revenue.  The reimbursable expenses are different under the terms of the Amended Continental CPA versus the Original Continental CPA, and therefore revenues are inconsistent with prior periods, beginning July 1, 2008.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreement with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

            There were no disagreements on any matters of accounting principles of financial statement disclosure between us and our independent auditors.

            On November 20, 2008, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors engaged KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.  We have not identified any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.

            (c) The Board of Directors, acting through its Audit Committee, is responsible for the oversight of our accounting policies, financial reporting and internal control.  The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of outside directors who are independent and approves decisions regarding the appointment or removal of the Director of Internal Audit.  It meets periodically with management, the independent auditors and the internal auditors to ensure that they are carrying out their responsibilities.  The Audit Committee is also responsible for performing an oversight role by reviewing the Company’s financial reports.  The independent auditors and the internal auditors have full and unlimited access to the Audit Committee, with or without management, to discuss the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, and any other matters which they believe should be brought to the attention of the Audit Committee.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

            The information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the definitive proxy statement for our 2009 annual stockholders meeting.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

            The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the definitive proxy statement for our 2009 annual stockholders meeting.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

            The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the definitive proxy statement for our 2009 annual stockholders meeting.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

            The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the definitive proxy statement for our 2009 annual stockholders meeting.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

            The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the definitive proxy statement for our 2009 annual stockholders meeting.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 

The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data":

(a)	(1)		Financial Statements
		•	Report of Management
		•	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
		•	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
		•	Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2008
		•	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
		•	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2008
		•	Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders' Equity for each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2008
		•	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
	(2)		Financial Statement Schedules:
		•	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
		•	Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

            All other schedules have been omitted because they are inapplicable, not required or the information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

Exhibit Number			Description
3.1		—	Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended by the Certificate of Amendment dated July 1, 2008 and Certificate of Amendment dated October 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).
3.2		—	Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's report on Form 8-K dated May 24, 2007, File No. 1-31300).
4.1		—	Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Reg. No. 333-64808, the “S-1”).
4.2		—	Rights Agreement among the Company, Continental Airlines, Inc. ("Continental") and Mellon Investor Services LLC, as Rights Agent, including form of Rights Certificate, dated April 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, File No. 1-31300, the "Q102 10-Q").
4.2	(a)	—	First Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated December 13, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 (a) to the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, File No. 1-31300, the “2006 10-K”).
4.2	(b)	—	Second Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2008).
4.3		—	Indenture among the Company, ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. ("Airlines") and Bank One, N.A., dated August 5, 2003, relating to the Company's Original 4.25% Convertible Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's report on Form 8-K dated September 2, 2003, File No. 1-31300).
4.3	(a)	—	Form of 4.25% Convertible Note due 2023 (included with Exhibit 4.3).
4.3	(b)	—	Form of Notation of Guarantee (included with Exhibit 4.3).
4.3	(c)	—	First Supplemental Indenture among the Company, Airlines, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor to Bank One, N.A.) dated July 30, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s report on Form 8-K dated July 30, 2008, File No. 1-31300).
4.3	(d)	—	Security and Collateral Agency Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2008, between the Company and the Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s report on Form 8-K dated July 30, 2008, File No. 1-31300).
10.1		—	Second Amended and Restated Capacity Purchase Agreement (the Continental "CPA") among the Company, XJT Holdings, Inc., Airlines and Continental (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008). (1)
10.1	(a)	—	First Amendment to the Continental CPA dated August 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).

10.1	(b)	—	Second Amendment to the Continental CPA dated December 23, 2008. (3)*
10.2		—	Amended and Restated Tax Agreement among the Company, Airlines and Continental dated July 22, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, File No. 1-31300).
10.3		—	2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2002 SIP") (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Q102 10-Q). (2)
10.3	(a)	—	Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the 2002 SIP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8(a) to the S-1). (2)
10.3	(b)	—	Form of Outside Director Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the 2002 SIP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8(b) to the S-1). (2)
10.3	(c)	—	Form of Employee Restricted Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the 2002 SIP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, File No. 1-31300, the “Q204 10-Q”). (2)
10.3	(d)	—	Form of Outside Director Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the 2002 SIP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Q204 10-Q). (2)
10.4		—	ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2007 SIP") (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's report on Form 8-K dated May 23, 2007, File No. 1-31300). (2)
10.4	(a)	—	Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the 2007 SIP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4(a) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Reg. No. 333-143249, the “S-8”). (2)
10.4	(b)	—	Form of Outside Director Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the 2007 SIP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4(b) to the S-8). (2)
10.4	(c)	—	Form of Employee Restricted Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the 2007 SIP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4(c) to the S-8. (2)
10.4	(d)	—	Form of Outside Director Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the 2007 SIP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4(d) to the S-8). (2)
10.4	(e)	—	ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Program adopted under the 2007 SIP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8(e) to the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). (2)
10.4	(f)	—	Form of award under the 2007 Long Term Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8(f) to the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). (2)
10.5		—	Management Bonus Plan as amended and restated through May 23, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's report on Form 8-K dated May 23, 2007, File No. 1-31300). (2)

10.6		—	ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2006, File No. 1-31300). (2)
10.6	(a)	—	Form of Participation Agreement under the ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan (included with Exhibit 10.11). (2)
10.6	(b)	—	First Amendment to Long Term Incentive Plan dated as of September 12, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Q307 10-Q). (2)
10.6	(c)	—	Second Amendment to Long Term Incentive Plan dated as of November 20, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s report on Form 8-K dated November 26, 2008). (2)
10.7		—	Employment Agreement among the Company, Continental and James B. Ream (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the S-1). (2)
10.7	(a)	—	Letter Agreement among the Company, Continental and Mr. Ream dated April 24, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(a) to the Q102 10-Q). (2)
10.7	(b)	—	Amendment to Mr. Ream's Employment Agreement dated March 14, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12(b) to the 2004 10-K). (2)
10.7	(c)	—	Amendment to Mr. Ream’s Employment Agreement dated April 10 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008). (2)
10.8		—	Employment Agreement among the Company, and LamPhung Ngo-Burns (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008). (2)
10.9		—	Employment Agreement among the Company, Continental and Charles R. Coble (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). (2)
10.9	(a)	—	Letter Agreement among the Company, Continental and Mr. Coble dated April 24, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(a) to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). (2)
10.9	(b)	—	Amendment to Mr. Coble's Employment Agreement dated March 14, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(b) to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). (2)
10.9	(c)	—	Amendment to Mr. Coble’s Employment Agreement dated April 10 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008). (2)

10.10		—	Employment Agreement among the Company, Continental and James E Nides (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). (2)
10.10	(a)	—	Letter Agreement among the Company, Continental and Mr. Nides dated April 24, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15(a) to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). (2)
10.10	(b)	—	Amendment to Mr. Nides’ Employment Agreement dated March 14, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15(c) to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). (2)
10.10	(c)	—	Amendment to Mr. Nides’ Employment Agreement dated April 10 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008). (2)
10.11		—	Employment Agreement among the Company and Karen Miles dated April 10, 2008. (2) (3)
10.12		—	Form of Amended and Restated Letter Agreement relating to certain flight benefits between the Company and its non-employee directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, File No. 1-31300). (2)
10.13		—	Schedule of compensation payable to the Company’s non-employee directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008). (2) (3)
10.14		—	Schedule of auction-rate securities held. (3)
10.15		—	Agreement by and among the Company, Hayman Investments, L.L.C., Hayman Advisors, L.P., Hayman Capital Master Fund, L.P. and J. Kyle Bass, dated March 17, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s report on Form 8-K dated March 17, 2008, File No. 1-31300).
10.16		—	Agreement by and among the Company and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC dated February 23, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s report on form 8-K dated February 23, 2009, File No. 1-31300).
21.1		—	Subsidiaries of the Company. (3)
23.1		—	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. (3)
24.1		—	Powers of Attorney. (3)
31.1		—	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer. (3)
31.2		—	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Financial Officer. (3)
32.1		—	Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer. (4)
32.2		—	Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer. (4)
*			The Company has applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission for confidential treatment for portions of the exhibit.

(1)	The SEC has granted confidential treatment for portions of these exhibits.  Omitted material for which confidential treatment has been granted has been filed separately with the SEC.
(2)	Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which a director or executive officer participates.
(3)	Filed herewith.
(4)	Furnished herewith.

SIGNATURES

            Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC. (Registrant)
Date:  March 2, 2009	By:	/s/ LAMPHUNG NGO-BURNS
		Phung Ngo-Burns Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

            Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 2, 2009.

Signatures		Capacity
/s/ JAMES B. REAM                              James B. Ream		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ LAMPHUNG NGO-BURNS                 LamPhung Ngo-Burns		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ ROBERT E. BICKMORE                    Robert E. Bickmore		Senior Director and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ SALVATORE J. BADALAMENTI*       Salvatore J. Badalamenti		Director
/s/ GEORGE R. BRAVANTE, JR.*          George R. Bravante, Jr.		Director
/s/ JANET M. CLARKE*                         Janet M. Clarke		Director
/s/ KIM A. FADEL*                                 Kim A. Fadel		Director
/s/ JUDITH R. HABERKORN*                  Judith R. Haberkorn		Director
/s/ ANDREW JENT*                               Andrew Jent		Director
/s/ T. PATRICK KELLY*                         T. Patrick Kelly		Director
/s/ WILLIAM F. LOFTUS*                       William F. Loftus		Director
/s/ BONNIE S. REITZ*                            Bonnie S. Reitz		Director
	*By:	/s/ Suzanne L. Johnson                       Suzanne L. Johnson Attorney in Fact March 2, 2009

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of

ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.          

            We have audited the consolidated financial statements of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and have issued our report thereon dated February 27, 2009 (included elsewhere in this Form 10-K).  Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K.  This schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.

            In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                                                                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, Texas
February 27, 2009

EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2008
(In thousands)

		Allowance for Doubtful Receivables			Allowance for Obsolescence			Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance (1)
Balance, December 31, 2005	$	99		$	9,101		$	334,806
Additions charged to expense		24			1,496			—
Deductions from reserve (2)		—			(837	)		(23,853	)
Other (3)		—			—			826
Balance, December 31, 2006		123			9,760			311,779
Additions charged to expense		414			2,764			1,031
Deductions from reserve (2)		(178	)		(989	)		—
Other		—			—			243
Balance, December 31, 2007		359			11,535			313,053
Additions charged to expense		489			2,077			27,862
Deductions from reserve (2)		(104	)		(685	)		—
Other		—			—			—
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	744		$	12,927		$	340,915

(1)	The deferred tax asset valuation allowance includes the net tax agreement obligation to Continental.
(2)	“Deductions from reserve” related to the allowance for obsolescence consists of entries made to remove spare parts with zero net book value from our general ledger.  “Deductions from reserve” related to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance are related to payments made to Continental under the tax agreement.
(3)	“Other” related to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance for 2005 is related to the adjustment of the fair value of the tax basis of our tangible and intangible assets as described in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 10 – Income Taxes.”

EX-10.1B

Exhibit 10.1b

December 23, 2008

Mr. Mark Erwin
Senior Vice President Corporate Development & Alliances
Continental Airlines, Inc.
1600 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002

            Second  Amendment (this “Second  Amendment”) to that certain Second Amended and Restated Capacity Purchase Agreement among Continental Airlines, Inc. (“Continental”), ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”), XJT Holdings, Inc. (“XJT”) and ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. (“ExpressJet” and, collectively with Holdings and XJT, “Contractor”) dated as of June 5, 2008 (the “Original Second Amended and Restated CPA”), as amended by that certain First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated CPA dated August 29, 2008 (the “Second Amended and Restated CPA”)

            As you are aware, Continental and Contractor are parties to the Second Amended and Restated CPA. Continental and Contractor each desires to amend the Second Amended and Restated CPA as specifically provided below in this Second Amendment, with such amendments to be effective as of August 29, 2008:

            Section 1.         The revised Appendix 1 to Schedule 3 attached to this Second Amendment hereby replaces in its entirety the Appendix 1 to Schedule 3 attached to the Second Amended and Restated CPA.  Continental and Contractor agree that nothing in this Section 3 or in Appendix 1 to Schedule 3 attached hereto shall in any way (i) amend or modify the provisions of Section 2.01(b) of the Second Amended and Restated CPA, or (ii) create or disclaim (or be deemed, construed or implied to create or disclaim) any obligation other than as is expressly and specifically provided for in this Section 3 (and in Appendix 1 to Schedule 3 attached hereto).

            Section 2.         Contractor agrees that following sentence shall be added to the end of Section 2.b. of Appendix 4 to Schedule 3 attached to the Second Amended and Restated CPA:

            “Any expenses borne by Contractor to develop Contractor’s Fuel Efficiency program for which Contractor intends to seek reimbursement from Continental as herein provided must be pre-approved by Continental and any such expenses reimbursed by Continental to Contractor shall be deducted from any dollar amount of fuel savings (as determined by performing the calculations described in clauses (a) through (d) above) prior to determining the amount of any fuel bonus payments payable to Contractor hereunder (it being acknowledged that any such expenses not applied to savings shall be carried forward to future years as necessary until the balance of such expenses is zero); provided, however, that in no event shall the reimbursement of such expenses be conditioned upon, or delayed pending, the achievement of any savings or other objectives under Contractor’s Fuel Efficiency program.”

            Section 3.         Contractor and Continental agree that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 2 of the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated CPA, for purposes of calculating the amount that Continental is required to pay to Contractor pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated CPA in respect of any depreciation expenses associated with either Covered Aircraft or Excess Inventory, the scheduled depreciation period for such depreciation expenses chargeable to Continental pursuant to Subsection B.4.a.xi of Schedule 3 to the Second Amended and Restated CPA shall not be shortened from that period currently used by Contractor (as indicated by the invoices related thereto that have been presented to Continental and paid by Continental), notwithstanding any change in accounting treatment that Contractor may implement relating to the period over which any such depreciation will be taken for accounting purposes. The foregoing shall also apply to any future depreciation expense associated with Covered Aircraft or Excess Inventory that may become chargeable to Continental pursuant to Subsection B.4.a.xi of Schedule 3 to the Second Amended and Restated CPA, it being agreed that Contractor shall, for purposes of calculating the amount that Continental is required to pay to Contractor pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated CPA, utilize either the scheduled depreciation period that Contractor would have utilized prior to its entry into of the Second Amended and Restated CPA (and consistent with the invoices for depreciation expenses related to Covered Aircraft and Excess Inventory presented to Continental and paid by Continental under the Existing CPA) or any longer period that Contractor may utilize in respect of such expenditures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Further to the foregoing, Contractor and Continental agree that with respect to any capital expenditures specifically approved by Continental in writing related to Covered Aircraft or Excess Inventory, in determining the amount of any payment required to be made by Continental to Contractor pursuant to Section 8.03(g) of the Second Amended and Restated CPA, the “net book value” of such assets referenced therein shall be deemed to mean and refer to the net book value of such assets that would have been shown on Contractor’s most recent financial statements if Contractor had accounted for such assets in the same manner as Contractor had charged Continental for the related depreciation expense. For the avoidance of doubt, it is acknowledged that if Contractor retains a Covered Aircraft in accordance with Contractor’s rights to do so pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated CPA, at the time as such Covered Aircraft ceases to be a Covered Aircraft, Continental would no longer be required to pay any depreciation expenses associated with such Covered Aircraft.

            Section 4.         Capitalized terms not defined herein shall be defined as provided in the Second Amended and Restated CPA.  From and after the date of this Second Amendment, references in the Second Amended and Restated CPA to “this Agreement” shall mean and refer to the Second Amended and Restated CPA as amended by this Second Amendment.  Except as specifically amended or modified hereby, the Second Amended and Restated CPA shall remain in effect as written.  The Second Amended and Restated CPA, as amended or modified by this Second Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects, and shall be deemed to constitute the entire understanding of the parties relating to its subject matter (and further that any prior or contemporaneous oral commitments shall have no force or effect), and such agreement, as so amended hereby, may not be further amended, modified or changed except by further agreement in writing signed by the parties hereto.  This Second Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in any number of separate counterparts, all of which shall constitute one agreement.  All signatures need not be on one counterpart.

            If Continental is in agreement with the above, please indicate its agreement by having an authorized representative sign below in the spaces provided and return a signed copy of this Second Amendment to the undersigned at the address above.

Very truly yours,
EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.

By:       /s/ James B. Ream
Name:  James B. Ream
Title:     President and Chief Executive Officer

XJT HOLDINGS, INC.

By:       /s/ James B. Ream
Name:  James B. Ream
Title:     President and Chief Executive Officer

EXPRESSJET AIRLINES, INC.

By:       /s/ James B. Ream
Name:  James B. Ream
Title:     President and Chief Executive Officer

Agreed:

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

By:       /s/ Mark Erwin
Name:  Mark Erwin
Title:     Senior Vice President Corporate Development & Alliances

cc:        Continental Airlines, Inc.
            1600 Smith Street, HQSLG, Houston, Texas 77002
            Attention: General Counsel
            Telecopy No.: (713) 324-5161

            ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.
            700 North Sam Houston Parkway West, Suite 200, Houston, Texas 77067
            Attention:  Vice President & General Counsel
            Telecopy No.: (832) 353-1141

Appendix 1 to Schedule 3

$ [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTAIL TREATMENT] for each actual block hour (which shall be the “block hour” rate referred to in Schedule 3.A.1.a of this Agreement).

* This Base Compensation Rate shall be adjusted to the extent provided pursuant to the terms of Section 3.02 of this Agreement.

                        In addition, for each calendar month beginning with the month of September 2008 and extending through (and including) June 2009 (such period from September 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, being herein referred to as the “Review Period”), Continental and Contractor, as part of the monthly flight reconciliation process pursuant to Section 3.06(b) of this Agreement, shall compare the number of Actual Monthly Block Hours for such calendar month with the number of Baseline Monthly Block Hours for such calendar month, and Continental shall pay Contractor $ [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTAIL TREATMENT] for each Extra Monthly Payment Hour, if any, for such month, provided that, in no event shall Continental be required (a) to pay an amount greater than $ [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTAIL TREATMENT] for any one month or $ [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTAIL TREATMENT] in the aggregate in respect of Extra Monthly Payment Hours during the Review Period or (b) to make any payment under this paragraph in respect of any calendar month after the Review Period.  After the Review Period, Contractor shall pay Continental an amount equal to $ [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTAIL TREATMENT] for each Aggregate Accrued Block Hour, if any, existing as of June 30, 2009, subject to the proviso at the end of the next paragraph (such payment to be made in July 2009 as part of the monthly flight reconciliation process pursuant to Section 3.06(b) of this Agreement).

                        During each calendar month beginning with the month of July 2009 and extending through (and including) the end of the Base Term or, if earlier, the date on which Contractor has provided a discount to Continental in an aggregate amount equal to $ [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTAIL TREATMENT] (such period being herein referred to as the “Discount Period”), Continental and Contractor, as part of the monthly flight reconciliation process pursuant to Section 3.06(b) of this Agreement, shall compare the number of Actual Monthly Block Hours for such calendar month with the number of Baseline Monthly Block Hours for such calendar month, and Contractor shall provide to Continental and Continental shall receive (and Continental shall be entitled to apply and take) a discount on any amounts owed to Contractor under the CPA equal to $ [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTAIL TREATMENT] per Discount Payment Hour, if any, for such month, provided that, if for any reason any such discount cannot be applied and taken such month, the unapplied portion thereof shall be applied and taken in succeeding months until such discount has been fully applied and taken, and provided further, that, in no event shall all such monthly payments in the aggregate made by Contractor pursuant to this paragraph exceed $ [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTAIL TREATMENT].

            Solely for the purposes of calculating amounts payable under the two preceding paragraphs of this Appendix 1 to Schedule 3, the following terms shall have the definitions set forth below:

            “Accrued Block Hours” means, for each calendar month in the Review Period for which Actual Monthly Block Hours exceeds Baseline Monthly Block Hours, the number of hours by which Actual Monthly Block Hours for such month exceeds Baseline Monthly Block Hours for such month.

            “Actual Monthly Block Hours” means, for each calendar month, (a) the total actual block hours flown by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement during such calendar month, plus (b) the total block hours that are scheduled by Continental to be flown pursuant to a Final Monthly Schedule in accordance with this Agreement but which are not actually flown because the flight is not operated during such calendar month by Contractor as a result of a Controllable Cancellation.

            “Aggregate Accrued Block Hours” means the aggregate of all Accrued Block Hours from prior months in the Review Period, less the number of Accrued Block Hours previously applied to reduce the number of Extra Monthly Payment Hours pursuant to the last clause in the definition thereof.

                        “Baseline Monthly Block Hours” means the following number of block hours for each calendar month set forth below:

For September 2008:   ****;
For October 2008:       ****;
For November 2008:    ****;
For December 2008:    ****;
For January 2009:        ****;
For February 2009:      ****;
For March 2009:          ****;
For April 2009:            ****; 
For May 2009:             ****; and
For June 2009:             ****.

Following June 2009,
For each July:               ****;
For each August:          ****;
For each September:    ****;
For each October:        ****;
For each November:     ****;
For each December:     ****;  
For each January:         ****;
For each February:       ****;
For each March:           ****;
For each April:             ****; 
For each May:              ****; and
For each June:              ****.

**** [CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTAIL TREATMENT]

                        “Discount Payment Hours” means, for each calendar month in the Discount Period for which Actual Monthly Block Hours exceeds Baseline Monthly Block Hours, the number of hours by which Actual Monthly Block Hours for such month exceeds the Baseline Monthly Block Hours for such month.

                        “Extra Monthly Payment Hours” means, at the end of each calendar month in the Review Period in which Baseline Monthly Block Hours exceeds Actual Monthly Block Hours, the number of hours by which Baseline Monthly Block Hours exceeds Actual Monthly Block Hours, reduced by the number of Aggregate Accrued Block Hours, if any, existing at the beginning of such calendar month.

                        The foregoing definitions shall be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the defined terms.

EX-10.11

Exhibit 10.11

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

            THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made by and betweenEXPRESSJET AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Company”) and KAREN P. MILES (“Employee”).

W I T N E S S E T H:

            WHEREAS,Company, Continental Airlines, Inc. and Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of April 17, 2002 (the “Existing Agreement”); and

            WHEREAS,Company and Employee now desire to enter into this Agreement to replace and supersede the Existing Agreement in its entiretyeffective as of the date hereof (the “Effective Date”), except for provisions relevant to compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which provisions shall be effective as of January 1, 2005;

            NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and obligations contained herein, Company and Employee agree as follows:

ARTICLE I:  EMPLOYMENT AND DUTIES

            1.1       Employment; Effective Date.  Beginning as of the Effective Date, Company agrees to employ Employee and Employee agrees to be employed by Company, at will of both Company and Employee, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 

1.2       Position.  Beginning as of the Effective Date, Employee shall initially be employed in the position of Company’s Vice President – Human Resources and Administration.  Company may subsequently assign Employee to a different position or modify Employee’s duties and responsibilities.  Moreover, Company may assign this Agreement and Employee’s employment to any subsidiary or affiliate of Company.

            1.3       Duties and Services.  Employee agrees to serve in the position assigned pursuant to paragraph 1.2 and to perform diligently and to the best of her abilities the duties and services appertaining to such position as determined by Company, as well as such additional duties and services which Employee from time to time may be reasonably directed to perform by Company.

ARTICLE II:  AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP

            2.1       Employment At-Will.  The employment relationship between Employee and Company is at-will.  Each of Employee and Company shall have the right to terminate the employment relationship at any time and for any reason whatsoever, with or without cause, and without any liability or obligation except as may be expressly provided in this Agreement.

            2.2       Notice of Termination.  If Company or Employee desires to terminate Employee’s employment hereunder, it or she shall do so by giving written notice to the other party that it or she has elected to terminate Employee’s employment hereunder and stating the effective date and reason for such termination, provided that no such action shall alter or amend any other provisions hereof or rights arising hereunder.

            2.3       Company’s Right to Terminate.  Company, acting pursuant to an express resolution of the Board of Directors of Company (the “Board of Directors”), shall have the right to terminate Employee’s employment under this Agreement at any time for any of the following reasons:

                        (i)         upon Employee’s death;

                        (ii)        upon Employee’s becoming incapacitated for a period of at least 180 days by accident, sickness or other circumstance which renders her mentally or physically incapable of performing the material duties and services required of her hereunder on a full-time basis during such period;

                        (iii)       for cause, which for purposes of this Agreement shall mean Employee’s gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of, or Employee’s abuse of alcohol or drugs rendering her unable to perform, the material duties and services required of her pursuant to this Agreement;

                        (iv)       for Employee’s material breach of any provision of this Agreement which, if correctable, remains uncorrected for 30 days following receipt by Employee of written notice by Company of such breach; or

                        (v)        for any other reason whatsoever, in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors.

            2.4       Employee’s Right to Terminate.  Employee shall have the right to terminate her employment under this Agreement at any time for any of the following reasons:

                        (i)         the assignment to Employee of duties materially inconsistent with the duties associated with the position described in paragraph 1.2 as such duties are constituted as of the Effective Date;

                        (ii)        a material diminution in nature or scope of Employee’s authority, responsibilities, or title from those applicable to her as of the Effective Date;

                        (iii)       the occurrence of material acts or conduct on the part of Company or ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) or their respective officers or representatives which prevent Employee from performing her duties and responsibilities pursuant to this Agreement;

                        (iv)       Company or Holdings requiring Employee to be permanently based anywhere outside a major urban center in Texas; 

                        (v)        the taking of any action by Company or Holdings that would materially adversely affect the corporate amenities enjoyed by Employee on the Effective Date;

                        (vi)       a material breach by Company of any provision of this Agreement which, if correctable, remains uncorrected for 30 days following receipt by Company of written notice of such breach by Employee; or

                        (vii)      for any other reason whatsoever, in the sole discretion of Employee.

ARTICLE III:  COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

            3.1       Base Salary.  During the period of this Agreement, Employee shall receive a minimum annual base salary equal to the greater of (i) $190,000.00 or (ii) such amount as Company and Employee mutually may agree upon from time to time.  Employee’s annual base salary shall be paid in equal installments in accordance with Company’s standard policy regarding payment of compensation to employees but no less frequently than semimonthly.

3.2       Bonus Programs.  Employee shall participate in each cash bonus program maintained by Company or Holdings on and after the Effective Date (including without limitation any such program maintained for the year during which the Effective Date occurs) at a level which is not less than the participation level made available to similarly situated employees of the Company.

            3.3       Other Company Benefits.  During her employment hereunder, Employee and, to the extent applicable, Employee’s family, dependents and beneficiaries, shall be allowed to participate in all benefits, plans, and programs, including improvements or modifications of the same, which are now, or may hereafter be, available to similarly situated employees of Company.  Such benefits, plans and programs may include, without limitation, profit sharing plan, thrift plan, annual physical examinations, health insurance or health care plan, life insurance, disability insurance, pension plan, pass privileges on Company flights, flight privileges and the like.  Company shall not, however, by reason of this paragraph be obligated to institute, maintain, or refrain from changing, amending or discontinuing, any such benefit plan or program, so long as such changes are similarly applicable to similarly situated employees generally; provided, however, that Company shall not change, amend or discontinue Employee’s Flight Privileges (as defined below) without her prior written consent.

ARTICLE IV:  EFFECT OF TERMINATION

            4.1       Effect on Compensation.  Upon termination of the employment relationship by either Employee or Company, regardless of the reason therefore, all compensation and all benefits to Employee hereunder shall terminate contemporaneously with termination of her employment, except that (A) if such termination shall constitute an Involuntary Termination prior to a Change in Control or after the date that is eighteen months after a Change in Control (as such term is defined in paragraph 4.4), then, subject to the provisions of paragraphs 4.2 and 4.3, (i) Company shall provide Employee with Flight Privileges (as such term is defined in paragraph 4.4) for the remainder of Employee’s lifetime, (ii) Company shall provide Employee and her eligible dependents with Continuation Coverage (as such term is defined in paragraph 4.4) for the Severance Period (as such term is defined in paragraph 4.4), (iii)  Company shall pay Employee the Monthly Severance Amount (as such term is defined in paragraph 4.4) each month during the Severance Period, (iv) Company may, in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors or the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors pay Employee a pro rata target bonus as soon as administratively practicable after the decision to pay the pro rata target bonus is made but in no event later than two and one half months after the end of the calendar year in which the decision is made, and (v) Company shall provide Employee with Outplacement Services (as such term is defined in paragraph 4.4), or (B) if such termination is a result of Employee’s retirement under Company’s retirement policy or program generally applicable to similarly situated employees of Company, then Company shall, subject to the provisions of paragraph 4.3, provide Employee with Flight Privileges for the remainder of Employee’s lifetime, or (C) if such termination shall constitute an Involuntary Termination or a termination by Employee of Employee’s employment with Company for any reason encompassed by paragraph 2.4 and such termination occurs within eighteen months after a Change in Control, then, subject to the provisions of paragraphs 4.2 and 4.3, (1) Company shall provide Employee with Flight Privileges for the remainder of Employee’s lifetime, (2) Company shall provide Employee and her eligible dependents with Continuation Coverage (as such term is defined in paragraph 4.4) for the Severance Period (as such term is defined in paragraph 4.4), (3) Company shall pay Employee on the effective date of such termination a lump-sum cash payment in an amount equal to the sum of (A) a pro rata bonus payment (notwithstanding any contrary provision in Company’s cash bonus program) equal to the amount of Employee’s annual base salary pursuant to paragraph 3.1 at the rate in effect immediately prior to Employee’s termination of employment, multiplied by the target rate under Company’s cash bonus program at the rate in effect for the year of termination, and further multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days which have elapsed in the calendar year during which the date of termination falls, and the denominator of which is three hundred sixty-five (365), plus (B) two times the Employee’s base salary pursuant to paragraph 3.1 at the rate in effect immediately prior to Employee’s termination of employment, plus (C) two times the amount of Employee’s annual base salary pursuant to paragraph 3.1 at the rate in effect immediately prior to Employee’s termination of employment, multiplied by the target rate under Company’s cash bonus program in effect for the year of termination, and (4) Company shall provide Employee with Outplacement Services (as such term is defined in paragraph 4.4).  Notwithstanding anything contained herein, if Employee’s employment with Company is terminated by reason of an Involuntary Termination and a Change in Control occurs within six months following such Involuntary Termination, Employee shall, in lieu of the payments and benefits described in paragraph 4.1(A) above, be entitled to the payments and additional benefits described in this paragraph 4.1(C) with such additional payments and increased benefits to be delivered as if such Involuntary Termination occurred on the same date as, and immediately following, the Change in Control.  No remuneration or wages earned by Employee during or with respect to the Severance Period (whether earned as an employee, independent contractor, sole proprietor, joint venturer, or otherwise) shall reduce Company’s obligation to pay the Monthly Severance Amount each month during the Severance Period.  Company may set off any amounts owed by Employee to Company or any of its affiliates against any obligation to pay the Monthly Severance Amount.

            4.2       Liquidated Damages.  In light of the difficulties in estimating the damages to Employee in the event Employee’s employment is subject to an Involuntary Termination, Company and Employee hereby agree (for themselves and for the express and directly enforceable benefit of Company’s affiliates) that the payments and benefits, if any, to be received by Employee pursuant to paragraph 4.1 shall be received by Employee as liquidated damages.  Payment of the compensation and benefits to Employee pursuant to paragraph 4.1 shall be offset against any amounts to which Employee may otherwise be entitled under any and all severance plans and policies maintained by Company or its affiliates.

            4.3       Certain Post-Termination Obligations.  As part of the consideration for the compensation to be paid under this Agreement, to protect the trade secrets and confidential information of Company and its affiliates that have been and will in the future be disclosed or entrusted to Employee, the business opportunities of Company and its affiliates that have been and will in the future be disclosed or entrusted to Employee, the relationships with customers of Company and its affiliates that have been and will in the future be developed in Employee, the special training and knowledge relevant to Employee’s employment responsibilities and duties, or the business goodwill of Company and its affiliates that has been and will in the future be developed in Employee, and as an additional incentive for Company to enter into this Agreement, Company and Employee agree to the post-termination obligations set forth in this Agreement.  All payments and benefits to Employee hereunder shall be subject to Employee’s compliance with the following provisions for two full years after the termination of Employee’s employment hereunder:

                        (i)         Employee shall, upon reasonable notice, furnish such information and proper assistance to Company and its affiliates as may reasonably be required in connection with any litigation in which it or any of its affiliates is, or may become, a party;

                        (ii)        Employee will not, directly or indirectly for Employee or for others, in any geographic area or market where Company or any of its affiliates are conducting any business or have during the previous 12 months conducted such business:

                                    (a)        engage in any Competitive Business (as defined below);

                                    (b)        render advice or services to, or otherwise assist, any other person, association, or entity who is engaged, directly or indirectly, in any Competitive Business with respect to such Competitive Business; or

                                    (c)        induce any employee of Company or any affiliate of Company to terminate his or her employment with Company or such affiliate, or hire or assist in the hiring of any such employee by any person, association, or entity not affiliated with Company;

                        (iii)       any public statements made by Employee concerning Company or its affiliates, or their officers, directors, or employees shall be submitted in writing for prior approval by Company’s public relations and legal departments, and Employee shall not make any such public statements which are not so approved; and

                        (iv)       upon termination of employment, Employee shall (a) promptly return to Company all property (including all keys, passes, credit cards, documents, memoranda and computer hardware and software) of Company or any of its affiliates then in her possession or control, and (b) in the same manner as if she were still employed by Company, hold in confidence, and not disclose to any person, all business plans, trade secrets, and confidential or proprietary information of Company or any of its affiliates, and shall not use any such plans, secrets or information in a manner which is detrimental to Company or its affiliates.

            For purposes of this paragraph 4.3, the term “Competitive Business” shall mean the business of owning, acquiring, establishing, operating, and maintaining a regional airline in the United States.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the noncompetition obligations set forth in this paragraph shall not be considered violated if Employee becomes an employee, officer, consultant, advisor, or member of the board of directors of a major, mainline airline; provided however, that, if such airline also engages in a Competitive Business, then this exception shall apply only if Employee’s primary duties, and the principal portion of Employee’s working time, are related to the business of such airline other than the Competitive Business.

            If Employee fails to comply with the above obligations, Company may cease making any and all payments hereunder, and Company and Company’s affiliates may cease extending benefits to Employee and may recover by appropriate action instituted in any court of competent jurisdiction any severance payments theretofore paid to Employee.  Employee agrees that the obligations of Employee contained in this paragraph 4.3 are in addition to any rights Company or Company’s affiliates may have in law or at equity, and that it is not possible to measure in money the damages which may be suffered by Company or Company’s affiliates if Employee breaches any of the provisions of this paragraph 4.3.  Therefore, if Employee breaches any of the provisions of this paragraph 4.3, each of Company and Company’s affiliates shall be entitled to an injunction restraining Employee from violating such provisions.  If Company or any affiliate of Company shall institute any action or proceeding to enforce any such obligations, Employee hereby irrevocably waives the claim or defense that Company or an affiliate of Company has an adequate remedy at law and agrees not to assert in any such action or proceeding such claim or defense.  The foregoing shall not prejudice Company’s (or any of its affiliates’) right to require Employee to account for and pay over to Company or a Company affiliate, and Employee agrees to account for and pay over, the compensation, profits, monies, accruals and other benefits derived or received by Employee as a result of any transaction or occurrence constituting a breach of this paragraph 4.3.  The duration of the obligations of Employee under this paragraph 4.3 shall be extended by and for the term of any period during which Employee is in breach of this paragraph 4.3.

            Company and Employee agree that the foregoing restrictions are reasonable under the circumstances and that any breach of the covenants contained in this paragraph 4.3 would cause irreparable injury to Company.  Employee understands that the foregoing restrictions may limit Employee’s ability to engage in certain businesses anywhere in the United States during the period provided for above, but acknowledges that Employee will receive sufficiently high remuneration and other benefits under this Agreement to justify such restriction.  Further, Employee acknowledges that her skills are such that she can be gainfully employed in non-competitive employment, and that the agreement not to compete will in no way prevent her from earning a living.  Nevertheless, if any of the aforesaid restrictions are found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unreasonable, or overly broad as to geographic area or time, or otherwise unenforceable, the parties intend for the restrictions therein set forth to be modified by the court making such determination so as to be reasonable and enforceable and, as so modified, to be fully enforced.  By agreeing to this contractual modification prospectively at this time, Company and Employee intend to make this provision enforceable under the law or laws of all applicable states so that the entire agreement not to compete and this Agreement as prospectively modified shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be rendered void or illegal.  Such modification shall not affect the payments made to Employee under this Agreement.

            4.4       Certain Definitions and Additional Terms.  As used herein, the following capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned below:

                        (i)         “Change in Control” shall have the meaning assigned to such term in Holdings’ 2002 Stock Incentive Plan as in effect on the Effective Date; provided, however, that in any circumstance in which the foregoing definition would be operative and with respect to which the income tax under Section 409A of the Code would apply or be imposed, but where such tax would not apply or be imposed if the meaning of the term “Change in Control” met the requirements of Section 409A(a)(2)(A(v) of the Code, then the term “Change in Control” herein shall mean, but only for the transaction so affected, a “change in control event” within the meaning of Treas. Reg. §1.409A–3(i)(5);

                        (ii)        “Continuation Coverage” shall mean the continued coverage of Employee and her eligible dependents under the welfare benefit plans available to similarly situated employees of Company who have not terminated employment (or the provision of equivalent benefits), including, without limitation, medical, health, dental, life insurance, disability, vision care, accidental death and dismemberment, and prescription drug, at no greater cost to Employee than that applicable to a similarly situated Company employee who has not terminated employment; provided, however, that (1) subject to clause (2) below, the coverage under a particular welfare benefit plan (or the receipt of equivalent benefits) shall terminate upon Employee’s receipt of comparable benefits from a subsequent employer and (2) if Employee (and/or her eligible dependents) would have been entitled to retiree coverage under a particular welfare benefit plan had she voluntarily retired on the date of the termination of her employment, then such coverage shall be continued as provided in such plan upon the expiration of the Severance Period.  Such Continuation Coverage to Employee shall be provided as described above to the extent that the Continuation Coverage shall not result in taxable income to Employee or, if the provision of such Continuation Coverage is taxable to Employee, then such Continuation Coverage shall be provided by Employee paying the cost of continued coverage to Company and Company reimbursing the Employee the amount of the cost of continued coverage within 30 days thereafter, but in no event later than on or before the last day of the year following the year in which the expense was incurred.  Such reimbursement shall be administered consistently with the following additional requirements as set forth in Treas. Reg. 1.409A-(3)(i)(1)(iv):  (1) Employee's eligibility for benefits in one year will not affect Employee's eligibility for benefits in any other year and (2) Employee's right to benefits is not subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit.  To the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A of the Code, in the event the Employee is a "specified employee" (as defined in Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(i)) such reimbursement shall commence on the first day of the seventh month following the Employee's "separation from service" (as defined in Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i) and applicable administrative guidance issued thereunder.  Notwithstanding any provision in this Article IV to the contrary, to the extent permitted by applicable law, Employee’s entitlement to any benefit continuation pursuant to Section 601 et. seq. of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, shall commence at the end of the period of, and shall not be reduced by the provision of, any applicable Continuation Coverage;

                        (iii)       “Flight Privileges” shall mean flight privileges on each airline operated by Company or any of its affiliates or any successor or successors thereto (the “System”), consisting of space available flight passes for Employee and Employee’s eligible family members (as such eligibility was in effect on November 1, 2007), a Universal Air Travel Plan (UATP) card (or, in the event of discontinuance of the UATP program, a similar charge card permitting the purchase of air travel through direct billing to Company, Holdings, or any successor or successors thereto (a “Similar Card”)) in Employee’s name for charging on an annual basis up to the applicable Annual Travel Limit (as hereinafter defined) with respect to such year in value (valued identically to the calculation of imputed income resulting from such flight privileges described below) of flights (in any fare class) on the System for Employee, Employee’s spouse, Employee’s family and significant others as determined by Employee, and payment by Company to Employee (while an officer of Company) of an annual amount (not to exceed in any year the Annual Gross Up Limit (as hereinafter defined) with respect to such year) sufficient to pay, on an after tax basis (i.e., after the payment by Employee of all taxes on such amount), the U.S. federal, state and local income taxes on imputed income resulting from such flights (such imputed income to be calculated during the term of such Flight Privileges at the lowest published or unpublished fare (i.e., 21 day advance purchase coach fare, lowest negotiated consolidator net fare, or other lowest available fare) for the applicable itinerary (or similar flights on or around the date of such flight), regardless of the actual fare class booked or flown, or as otherwise required by law) or resulting from any other flight privileges extended to Employee as a result of Employee’s service as an employee of Company;

                        (iv)       “Involuntary Termination” shall mean any termination by Company of Employee’s employment with Company for any reason other than those reasons encompassed by paragraphs 2.3(i), (ii), (iii) or (iv);

                        (v)        “Monthly Severance Amount” shall mean an amount equal to one-twelfth of Employee’s annual base salary pursuant to paragraph 3.1 in effect immediately prior to the termination of Employee’s employment;

                        (vi)       “Outplacement Services” shall mean outplacement services whereby the Company receives a substantial business benefit by promoting a positive corporate image and maintaining corporate morale, at Company’s cost and for a period of twelve months beginning on the date of Employee’s termination of employment, to be rendered by an agency selected by Employee and approved by the Board of Directors or the Human Resources Committee of the Board (with such approval not to be unreasonably withheld); and

                        (vii)      “Severance Period” shall mean the period commencing on the date of Employee’s termination of employment and continuing for twenty-four months.

            As used for purposes of Flight Privileges, with respect to any year, “Annual Travel Limit” shall mean an amount (initially $22,618) (on a calendar-year basis and effective January 1 of each year), to Employee (such amount to be the same as that granted annually to officers of Company who are vice presidents of Company, but no less than the amount granted with respect to Employee for the flight benefits program year 2008; provided that, if Flight Privileges are provided to Employee pursuant to this Agreement after Employee’s termination of employment, then each annual grant for a calendar year beginning after such termination of employment shall, subject to the remaining provisions of this subparagraph, be in an amount equal to the amount of the annual grant Executive received for the year in which such termination of employment occurred), which amount shall be adjusted automatically upon any change in the valuation methodology for imputed income from flights (as compared with the valuation methodology for imputed income from flights used by Company as of November 1, 2007), so as to preserve the benefit of $22,618 annually of flights relative to the valuations resulting from the valuation methodology used by Companyas of November 1, 2007 (e.g., if a change in the valuation methodology results, on average, in such flights being valued 15% higher than the valuation that would result using the valuation methodology used by Company as of November 1, 2007, then the Annual Travel Limit would be increased by 15% to $26,011).  In determining any adjustment, Company shall be entitled to rely on a good faith calculation performed by its independent auditors based on a statistically significant random sampling of flight valuations compared with the applicable prior valuations of identical flights, which calculation will be provided to Employee upon request.  Company will promptly notify Employee in writing of any adjustments to the Annual Travel Limit described in this paragraph.  Any portion of the Annual Travel Limit that remains unused at the end of the calendar year for which it was awarded shall expire and be of no further use or value.

            As used for purposes of Flight Privileges, with respect to any year, the term “Annual Gross Up Limit” shall mean an amount (initially $12,179) granted annually (on a calendar-year basis and effective January 1 of each year), to Employee (such amount to be the same as that granted annually to officers of Company who are vice presidents of Company, but no less than the amount granted with respect to Executive for the flight benefits program year 2008), which amount shall be adjusted automatically upon any change in the valuation methodology for imputed income from flights (as compared with the valuation methodology for imputed income from flights used by Company as of November 1, 2007), so as to preserve the benefit of $12,179 annually of tax gross up relative to the valuations resulting from the valuation methodology used by Company as of November 1, 2007 (e.g., if a change in the valuation methodology results, on average, in flights being valued 15% higher than the valuation that would result using the valuation methodology used by Company as of November 1, 2007, then the Annual Gross Up Limit would be increased by 15% to $14,006).  In determining any adjustment, Company shall be entitled to rely on a good faith calculation performed by its independent auditors based on a statistically significant random sampling of flight valuations compared with the applicable prior valuations of identical flights, which calculation will be provided to Employee upon request.  Company will promptly notify Employee in writing of any adjustments to the Annual Gross Up Limit described in this paragraph.  Subject to the Annual Gross Up Limit, the amount of the annual gross up to be paid to Employee shall be paid no later than January 31 of the calendar year following the calendar year for which it was awarded.  Any portion of the Annual Gross Up Limit that remains unused at the end of the calendar year for which it was awarded shall expire and be of no further use or value.

            As used for purposes of tax reporting of Flight Privileges, a year may consist of twelve consecutive months other than a calendar year, it being Company’s practice as of November 1, 2007 for purposes of Flight Privileges for a year to commence on December 1 and end on the following November 30 (for example, the twelve-month period from December 1, 2007 to November 30, 2008 is considered the year 2008 for purposes of Flight Privileges).

            As used for purposes of Flight Privileges, the term “affiliates” when used with respect to Company, means any entity controlled by, controlling, or under common control with Company.   For these purposes control of an entity shall require the direct or indirect ownership of a majority of the outstanding capital stock or other voting interests of such entity.

            No tickets issued on the System in connection with the Flight Privileges may be purchased other than directly from Company, Holdings, or their respective successor or successors (i.e., no travel agent or other fee or commission based distributor may be used), nor may any such tickets be sold or transferred by Employee or any other person, nor may any such tickets be used by any person other than the person in whose name the ticket is issued.  Employee agrees that, after receipt of an invoice or other accounting statement therefor, she will promptly (and in any event within 45 days after receipt of such invoice or other accounting statement) reimburse Company or Holdings, as appropriate, for all charges on her UATP card (or Similar Card) which are not for flights on the System and which are not otherwise reimbursable to Employee under the applicable policies of Company for reimbursement of business expenses of officers of Company, or which are for tickets in excess of the applicable Annual Travel Limit.  Employee agrees that the credit availability under Employee’s UATP card (or Similar Card) may be suspended if Employee does not timely reimburse Company or Holdings, as appropriate, as described in the foregoing sentence or if Employee exceeds the applicable Annual Travel Limit with respect to a year; provided, that, immediately upon Company’s or Holdings’, as appropriate, receipt of Employee’s reimbursement in full (or, in the case of exceeding the applicable Annual Travel Limit, beginning the next following year and after such reimbursement), the credit availability under Employee’s UATP card (or Similar Card) will be restored.

            The sole cost to Employee of flights on the System pursuant to use of Employee’s Flight Privileges will be the imputed income with respect to flights on the System charged on Employee’s UATP card (or Similar Card), calculated throughout the term of Employee’s Flight Privileges at the lowest published or unpublished fare (i.e., 21 day advance purchase coach fare, lowest negotiated consolidator net fare or other lowest available fare) for the applicable itinerary (or similar flights on or around the date of such flight), regardless of the actual fare class booked or flown, or as otherwise required by law, and reported to Employee as required by applicable law.  With respect to any period for which Company is obligated to provide the tax gross up described above, Employee will provide to Company, upon request, a calculation or other evidence of Employee’s marginal tax rate sufficient to permit Company to calculate accurately the amount to be paid to Employee.

            Employee will be issued a UATP card (or Similar Card) and an appropriate flight pass identification card, each valid at all times during the term of Employee’s Flight Privileges.

            Flight Privileges are intended to be used solely for personal reasons and may not be used for business purposes.  Accordingly, notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, credit availability on Employee’s UATP card (or any Similar Card) may be suspended, and Employee’s UATP card (or any Similar Card) may be revoked or cancelled, if Employee’s UATP card (or any Similar Card) is used for business purposes (other than as described above) and, after receiving written notice from the Company to cease such usage, Employee again uses her UATP card (or any Similar Card) for any business purpose (other than as described above). The parties hereto agree that the Company’s obligations regarding Flight Privileges extend to the System. 

4.5       Payment Obligations Absolute.    Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Company’s obligation to pay Employee the amounts and to make the arrangements provided in this Article IV shall be absolute and unconditional and shall not be affected by any circumstances, including, without limitation, any set-off, counterclaim, recoupment, defense or other right which Company (including its subsidiaries and affiliates) may have against her or anyone else.  All amounts payable by Company shall be paid without notice or demand.  Employee shall not be obligated to seek other employment in mitigation of the amounts payable or arrangements made under any provision of this Article IV, and, except as provided in paragraph 4.4 with respect to Continuation Coverage, the obtaining of any such other employment (or the engagement in any endeavor as an independent contractor, sole proprietor, partner, joint venturer, or otherwise) shall in no event effect any reduction of Company’s obligations to make (or cause to be made) the payments and arrangements required to be made under this Article IV.

            4.6       Code Section 280G Provisions.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, if by reason of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) any payment or benefit received or to be received by Employee in connection with a Change in Control or the termination of Employee’s employment (whether payable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement (“Contract Payments”) or any other plan, arrangements or agreement with Company or an Affiliate (as defined below) (collectively with the Contract Payments, “Total Payments”)) would not be deductible (in whole or part) by Company, an Affiliate or other person making such payment or providing such benefit, then the Contract Payments shall be reduced (to zero if necessary) until no portion of the Total Payments is not deductible by reason of Section 280G of the Code; provided, however, that no such reduction shall be made unless the net after-tax benefit to Employee shall, after such reduction, exceed the net after-tax benefit received by Employee if no such reduction had been made and provided that if any reduction is required, the Contract Payments (that constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code) with the latest payment date shall be reduced first.  The foregoing determination and all determinations under this Section 4.6 shall be made by the Accountants (as defined below).  For purposes of this section, "net after-tax benefit" shall mean (i) the Total Payments that would constitute "parachute payments" within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, less (ii) the amount of all federal, state and local income taxes payable with respect to such payments calculated at the maximum marginal income tax rate for each year in which the foregoing shall be paid to Employee (based on the rate in effect for such year as set forth in the Code as in effect at the time of the first payment of the foregoing), less (iii) the amount of excise taxes imposed with respect to the payments and benefits described in (i) above by Section 4999 of the Code.  For purposes of the foregoing determinations, (a) no portion of the Total Payments the receipt or enjoyment of which Employee shall have effectively waived in writing prior to the date of payment of the Severance Payment shall be taken into account; (b) no portion of the Total Payments shall be taken into account which in the opinion of the Accountants does not constitute a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code (without regard to subsection (A)(ii) thereof); (c) the Contract Payments shall be reduced only to the extent necessary so that the Total Payments in their entirety constitute reasonable compensation for services actually rendered within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(4) of the Code, in the opinion of the Accountants;  and (d) the value of any non-cash benefit or any deferred payment or benefit included in the Total Payments shall be determined by the Accountants in accordance with the principles of Sections 280G(d)(3) and (4) of the Code.  For purposes of this Section 4.6, the term “Affiliate” means Company’s successors, any person whose actions result in a Change in Control or any corporation affiliated (or which, as a result of the completion of the transactions causing a Change in Control shall become affiliated) with Company within the meaning of Section 1504 of the Code and “Accountants” shall mean Company’s independent certified public accountants serving immediately prior to the Change in Control, unless the Accountants are also serving as accountant or auditor for the individual, entity or group effecting the Change in Control, in which case Company shall appoint another nationally recognized public accounting firm to make the determinations required hereunder (which accounting firm shall then be referred to as the Accountants hereunder).  For purposes of making the determinations and calculations required herein, the Accountants may make reasonable assumptions and approximations concerning applicable taxes and may rely on reasonable, good faith interpretations concerning the application of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code, provided that the Accountant's determinations must be made on the basis of  "substantial authority" (within the meaning of Section 6662 of the Code).  All fees and expenses of the Accountants shall be borne solely by Company.

            4.7       Code Section 409A Provisions.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the following provisions shall apply:

                        (i)         Employee shall be considered to have terminated employment with Company only when Employee incurs a “separation from service” with Company within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Code and applicable administrative guidance issued thereunder;

                        (ii)        to the extent that Employee is a specified employee, as defined in Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(i), and any stock of Company or of any affiliate is publicly traded on an established securities market or otherwise, no payment or benefit that is subject to Section 409A of the Code shall be made under this Agreement on account of Employee’s separation from service with Company within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Code, before the date that is the first day of the month that occurs six months after the date of Employee’s separation from service (or, if earlier, the date of death of Employee or any other date permitted under Section 409A of the Code).  The foregoing delay rule shall not apply to any payment or benefit hereunder (such as the Monthly Severance Amount) if, pursuant to Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(b)(9)(iii), such payment or benefit to be received by Employee hereunder due to an involuntary separation from service does not exceed two times the lesser of the Employee’s annual salary or the maximum amount that may be taken into account under a qualified plan pursuant to Section 401(a)(17) of the Code in the year in which the Employee has a separation from service and that is paid no later than the last day of the second year following the year in which the separation from service occurs;

                        (iii)       to the extent that any reimbursement is received or to be received by Employee, such reimbursements shall be administered consistent with the following additional requirements as set forth in Treas. Reg. 1.409A-3(i)(1)(iv):  (1) Employee’s eligibility for benefits in one year will not affect Employee’s eligibility for benefits in any other year, (2) any reimbursement of eligible expenses will be made on or before the last day of the year following the year in which the expense was incurred, and (3) Employee’s right to benefits is not subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit; and

                        (iv)       to the extent that any payment or benefit to be received by Employee hereunder is to be offset hereunder (by way of example, pursuant to paragraph 4.1 whereby the Company may set off any amounts owed by Employee to Company against any obligation to pay the Monthly Severance Amount), such offset may occur only if it would not result in an impermissible acceleration under Section 409A of the Code.

ARTICLE V:  MISCELLANEOUS

5.1       Notices.  For purposes of this Agreement, notices and all other communications provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when personally delivered or when mailed by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

            If to Company to:                     ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.
                                                            700 N. Sam Houston Parkway West, Suite 200
                                                            Houston, Texas  77067
                                                            Attention:  Chief Financial Officer

            If to Employee to:                    Karen P. Miles
                                                            2711 Roseheath
                                                            Houston, Texas 77073

or to such other address as either party may furnish to the other in writing in accordance herewith, except that notices of changes of address shall be effective only upon receipt.

            5.2       Applicable Law. This contract is entered into under, and shall be governed for all purposes by, the laws of the State of Texas.

            5.3       No Waiver.  No failure by either party hereto at any time to give notice to any breach by the other party of, or to require compliance with, any condition or provision of this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of similar or dissimilar provisions or conditions at the same or at any prior or subsequent time.

            5.4       Severability.  If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable, then the invalidity or unenforceability of that provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement, and all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

            5.5       Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same Agreement.

            5.6       Withholding of Taxes and Other Employee Deductions.  Company, its affiliates may withhold from any benefits and payment made pursuant to this Agreement all federal, state, city and other taxes as may be required pursuant to any law or governmental regulation or ruling and all other normal employee deductions made with respect to Company’s employees generally.

            5.7       Headings; Affiliates.  The paragraph headings have been inserted for purposes of convenience and shall not be used for interpretive purposes.  Except as otherwise provided herein, for purposes of this Agreement, the term “affiliate,” as applied to an entity (the “First Entity”), means an entity who directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, is controlled by, is controlling, or is under common control with the First Entity.

            5.8       Gender and Plurals.  Wherever the context so requires, the masculine gender includes the feminine or neuter, and the singular number includes the plural and conversely.

            5.9       Successors.  This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Company and its successors, and in each case “successor” shall include, without limitation, any person, association, or entity which may hereafter acquire or succeed to all or substantially all of the business or assets of Company by any means whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise.  Except as provided in the preceding sentence, this Agreement, and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder, are personal and neither this Agreement, nor any right, benefit or obligation of any party hereto, shall be subject to voluntary or involuntary assignment, alienation or transfer, whether by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the other parties.

            5.10     Effect of Termination.  Termination of the employment relationship under this Agreement shall not affect any right or obligation of any party which is accrued or vested prior to or upon such termination.

            5.11     Entire Agreement.  Except as provided in (i) the benefits, plans, and programs referenced in paragraph 3.3 and any awards under Company’s or Holdings’ stock incentive plans, the Management Bonus Program or similar plans or programs adopted by Company or Holdings after the Effective Date and (ii) separate agreements governing Employee’s flight privileges relating to other airlines, this Agreement, as of the Effective Date, will constitute the entire agreement of the parties with regard to the subject matter hereof, and will contain all the covenants, promises, representations, warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to employment of Employee by Company.  Effective as of the Effective Date, the Existing Agreement is hereby terminated and without any further force or effect, and each Prior Agreement is modified and/or revoked as set forth herein.  Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing and signed by the party to be charged.

            5.12     Deemed Resignations.  Any termination of Employee’s employment shall constitute an automatic resignation of Employee as an officer of Company and each affiliate of Company, and an automatic resignation of Employee from the board of directors of Company and from the board of directors of any affiliate of Company and from the board of directors or similar governing body of any corporation, limited liability company or other entity in which Company or any affiliate holds an equity interest and with respect to which board or similar governing body Employee serves as Company’s or such affiliate’s designee or other representative.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the 10th day of April, 2008, to be effective as of the Effective Date.

ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.

By:/s/ James B. Ream                                  

James B. Ream
President and Chief Executive Officer

“Employee”

By:/s/ Karen P. Miles                         

Karen P. Miles

EX-10.13

                                                                                                            Exhibit 10.13

ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.

  Non-Employee Director Compensation

                The following compensation schedule applied to directors who were not employees of the Company, up to September 11, 2008:

Annual Retainers

The highest applicable annual retainer amount of the amounts set forth below:

Director	$40,000 per year
Committee Chair (other than Audit)	$50,000 per year
Audit Committee Chair	$55,000 per year
Chairman of the Board	$60,000 per year

Meeting Fees

Each board meeting physically attended (Chair)	$3,000
Each board meeting physically attended (non-Chair)	$2,000
Each committee meeting physically attended	$2,000
Each board or committee meeting, telephonic participation	$1,000
Reimbursement of appropriate out-of-pocket expenses

Stock Grants*

•  $35,000 fair market value of restricted shares upon initial election to Board

•  $35,000 Black-Scholes value of stock options upon initial election to Board

•  $35,000 fair market value of restricted shares following each annual stockholders meeting

•  $35,000 Black-Scholes value of stock options following each annual stockholders meeting

Flight Benefits

                Benefits described in the Form of Amended and Restated Letter Agreement relating to certain flight benefits between the Company and our non-employee directors for whom we are able to secure such benefits (previously filed).

                Effective September 11, 2008, the following compensation schedule applied to directors who were not employees of the Company:

Annual Retainers

The highest applicable annual retainer amount of the amounts set forth below:

Director	$36,000 per year
Committee Chair (other than Audit)	$45,000 per year
Audit Committee Chair	$49,500 per year
Chairman of the Board	$54,000 per year

Meeting Fees

Each board meeting physically attended (Chair)	$2,700
Each board meeting physically attended (non-Chair)	$1,800
Each committee meeting physically attended	$1,800
Each board or committee meeting, telephonic participation	$   900
Reimbursement of appropriate out-of-pocket expenses

Stock Grants*

•  $31,500 fair market value of restricted shares upon initial election to Board

•  $31,500 Black-Scholes value of stock options upon initial election to Board

•  $31,500 fair market value of restricted shares following each annual stockholders meeting

•  $31,500 Black-Scholes value of stock options following each annual stockholders meeting

Flight Benefits

                Benefits described in the Form of Amended and Restated Letter Agreement relating to certain flight benefits between the Company and our non-employee directors for whom we are able to secure such benefits (previously filed).

*   The directors elected not to take the annual stock grants provided for herein during 2008.

EX-10.14

Exhibit 10.14

Schedule of Auction-Rate Securities Held

Name	Cusip	Notional Amount
College Loan Corp	194262DE8	5,000,000
Ed Funding of South	28148NBM4	4,950,000
Education Loan Inc.	280907AW6	4,150,000
GCO Ed Loan Funding	36156HAL2	5,000,000
GCO Ed Loan Funding	36156HAG3	5,000,000
Nelnet Education Loan	64031RAK5	5,000,000
Nelnet Education Loan	64031RAF6	5,000,000
Northstar Education	66704JBW7	1,075,000
Oklahoma Stud Loan	679110CN4	5,000,000
Oklahoma Student Loan	679110CN4	5,000,000
Penn St Higher Ed	709163EH8	5,000,000
SLM Stud Loan Trust	78442GJC1	3,000,000

EX-21.1

Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.

ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., a Delaware corporation
XJT Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-87236, 333-105187 and 333-143249 and Form S-3 No. 333-109108) pertaining to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan and the 4.25% Convertible Notes and common stock issuable thereunder respectively, of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc., of our reports dated February 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Houston, Texas

February 27, 2009

EX-24.1

Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:    February 12, 2009	/s/ Salvatore J. Badalamenti
	Salvatore J. Badalamenti

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:   February 12, 2009	/s/ George R. Bravante, Jr.
	George R. Bravante, Jr.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:   February 12, 2009	/s/ Janet M. Clarke
	Janet M. Clarke

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:   February 12, 2009	/s/ Kim A, Fadel
	Kim A. Fadel

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:   February 28, 2009	/s/ Judith R. Haberkorn
	Judith R. Haberkorn

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:   February 12, 2009	/s/ T. Patrick Kelly
	T. Patrick Kelly

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:   February 12, 2009	/s/ James B. Ream
	James B. Ream

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:     February 12, 2009	/s/ Bonnie S. Reitz
	Bonnie S. Reitz

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:   February 12, 2009	/s/ Andrew Jent
	Andrew Jent

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:   February 12, 2009	/s/ LamPhung Ngo-Burns
	LamPhung Ngo-Burns

POWER OF ATTORNEY

            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, a director and/or officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint James B. Ream, LamPhung Ngo-Burns and Suzanne L. Johnson, or any of them, as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys in fact and agents to execute in the name, place and stead of the undersigned the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (and any amendments thereto), to be filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as fully and effectively in all respects as the undersigned could do if personally present.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney on and as of the date set forth below.

Date:   February 12, 2009	/s/ William F. Loftus
	William F. Loftus

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
I, James B. Ream, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 2, 2009	/s/ James B. Ream
	James B. Ream President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
I, LamPhung Ngo-Burns, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date March 2, 2009	/s/LamPhung Ngo-Burns
	LamPhung Ngo-Burns Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.
I, James B. Ream, President and Chief Executive Officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that based on my knowledge:
(1)	the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.
This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.

Date:  March 2, 2009	/s/ James B. Ream
	James B. Ream President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.
I, LamPhung Ngo-Burns, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that based on my knowledge:
(1)	the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.
This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.

Date:  March 2, 2009	/s/ LamPhung Ngo-Burns
	LamPhung Ngo-Burns Vice President and Chief Financial Officer