EX-1 2 ex1.htm EXHIBIT 1

 
(DISCOVERY GROUP LOGO)
 
 
Mark Buckley
 
1 312 265 9607
 
mbuckley@thediscoverygroup.com
 
September 30, 2013
 
The Board of Directors
c/o Mr. Nachum “Homi” Shamir
President, Chief Executive Officer
Given Imaging Ltd.
3950 Shackleford Rd NW
Duluth, GA  30096
 
Dear Directors:
 
As one of the largest and longest-tenured shareholders of Given Imaging, we are writing to urge you to take two immediate actions for the sake of all shareholders; (1) implement a $50 million share repurchase or dividend to take advantage of the expiring “Trapped Profits Law”, and (2) pursue a subsequent sale of the Company to a larger strategic buyer that will recognize Given Imaging’s inherent strengths and value.
 
Given Imaging has until November 15, 2013 to elect to participate in the “Trapped Profits Law,” an amendment to Israel’s “Investment Law” which governs the taxation of the Company. The “Trapped Profits Law” will allow Given Imaging to take advantage of reduced corporate income tax rates while returning up to $50 million in excess cash to shareholders. We recommend that the Company utilize a fixed-price tender offer or Dutch Auction share repurchase to disgorge its excess cash, as opposed to a dividend, in order to capitalize on Given Imaging’s depressed share price. We expand on these alternatives later in this letter.
 
Immediately following the share repurchase, we also strongly urge the Board to initiate a comprehensive and complete process to sell the Company. Given Imaging has been chronically undervalued in the public markets during the past several years primarily due to mismanagement. As evidence, this letter will present four major areas in which management has squandered the fair value of the Company: (1) Failed Execution of Business Strategy; (2) Weak Financial Performance; (3) Loss of Management Credibility with Investors; and (4) Inefficient Capital Structure. Despite the mismanagement of the Company, we are not calling for a change in management. A sale to a strategic buyer is the most timely and compelling means of maximizing shareholder value. Excluding the impact of a potential share repurchase or dividend, our detailed valuation analysis shows that Given Imaging could reasonably achieve a value of $26 to $30 per share in a company sale.
 
Discovery Group invested in Given Imaging because of its transformative and disruptive technology, as well as the large untapped end-markets related to Crohn’s monitoring and colorectal cancer screening. However, we no longer believe the Company can attain its true intrinsic value in the public markets. By returning excess cash to shareholders and conducting a full auction process to sell the Company, the Board will remove the execution risk that we believe exists under the current management while providing shareholders with an attractive return.
 
191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 1685, Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 

 

 
Board of Directors
Given Imaging Ltd.
Page 2
 
Discovery Group Background
 
Discovery Group is a long-time shareholder, initially investing in the Company in early 2011. We currently own approximately 4% of the common stock outstanding and have consistently been one of Given Imaging’s largest shareholders. We have maintained a high degree of interaction with the Company since our initial investment, including over 25 in-person meetings and conference calls with Mr. Homi Shamir, Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Yuval Yanai, Chief Financial Officer, and other senior management; two visits to the Digestive Disease Week trade show; conversations with representatives from IDB Holding Corporation, the Company’s largest shareholder; and due diligence calls with various GI physicians.
 
In the 12+ years of operating our fund, we have successfully invested in hundreds of undervalued micro-cap companies, including numerous medical device companies such as Micrus Endovascular, Cardiovascular Systems, Somanetics, Endologix, Home Diagnostics, Sonosite, I-Flow, VNUS Medical Technologies, and Cholestech.
 
Chronic Undervaluation
 
It is common for the public market to discount micro-cap companies relative to their inherent values since their small float, limited trading volume, and general lack of research coverage lead to low institutional investor interest. In Given Imaging’s case, we believe the discount is exacerbated due to mismanagement of both the business and investor expectations.  Since the beginning of Mr. Shamir’s tenure as CEO the stock has declined approximately 10%, significantly underperforming the NASDAQ Composite during the same time period. Managements’ response to this fact is that Given Imaging is burdened by its location in Israel. However, the Company’s stock has also significantly underperformed the TA-100 Index of the 100 most highly capitalized companies listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.
 
(LINE GRAPH)
 
 
 
 

 

 
Board of Directors
Given Imaging Ltd.
Page 3
 
Failed Execution of Business Strategy
 
By our analysis, Given Imaging posted organic growth of 1.1% in 2012 and has averaged only 4.2% organic growth during the past five fiscal years. Several growth initiatives failed to materialize, were delayed numerous times, and generally did not live up to the expectations set by management.
 
 
The Company received updated clearance from the FDA for its PillCam SB capsule in March 2011, allowing it to be utilized in the monitoring of inflammatory bowel diseases such as Crohn’s disease. Despite increased sales & marketing activities, the impact on revenue has been minimal due to limited reimbursement and an inability to convince medical practitioners to adopt the technology. In the first six months of 2013, the number of PillCam SB capsules sold in the Americas region declined 5% compared to the same period in 2012.
 
In our conversations with management, they have placed the blame for the stagnant growth on the global financial crisis and its impact on procedure volumes. However, softer procedure volumes is an issue impacting the entire medical device industry.  As demonstrated in the chart below, Given Imaging has severely underperformed the industry in terms of growth whether measured over the last one, three, or five years.
 
   
Average Revenue Growth
   
1-Year
 
3-Year
 
5-Year
                   
Given Imaging (reported growth)
    1.4 %     8.5 %     9.9 %
Given Imaging (organic growth)
    1.1 %     3.0 %     4.2 %
                         
U.S Exchange-Traded Medical Device Companies (Market Cap > $100M: 91 Companies)
           
Top Quartile
    16.5 %     17.6 %     16.0 %
Median
    9.7 %     11.1 %     9.8 %
Bottom Quartile
    2.6 %     5.1 %     4.8 %
                         
Source: Capital IQ                        
 
Management has also claimed that the longer reading times required by the PillCam SB hampered market adoption. While this may be true, management’s failure to achieve broad reimbursement is a significant contributor to the poor market adoption. Less than 20% of the U.S. population has coverage for capsule endoscopy of the small bowel for diagnostic re-evaluation of Crohn’s disease.
 
 
Given Imaging had to initiate two separate recalls of its Bravo product in early 2012. After initially experiencing strong growth following the acquisition of the business, current Bravo revenue remains significantly lower than pre-recall levels.
 
In their defense of the poor Bravo performance, management has again pointed to issues affecting the industry as a whole: (1) changes in Medicare reimbursement rates; and (2) limiting of payment for procedures performed in Ambulatory Surgical Centers as a result of the Affordable Care Act. The second rationale especially rings hollow since the change in payment did not take effect until the second quarter of 2013, well after the Bravo product had experienced a significant decline in revenue.
 
 
Given Imaging has long touted the market opportunity for PillCam COLON, particularly in the U.S. and Japanese markets. The Company initially communicated that a clinical trial for FDA submission would commence in the second half of 2010 with potential commercialization in 2012. The trial was ultimately delayed over a year from initial expectations. The Company and its shareholders are still waiting for FDA approval. Even if Given Imaging receives FDA approval in the near-term, management has indicated commercialization is several years away since the Company will need to first establish reimbursement coverage.
 
 
 

 

 
Board of Directors
Given Imaging Ltd.
Page 4
 
In addition, the Company abruptly changed its FDA submission in August 2012 to target only those patients who previously had incomplete colonoscopies. This change reduced the potential end-market from roughly 3.5 million people annually to roughly 750,000 people annually.
 
 
The Company has not secured reimbursement coverage and market acceptance in several important geographies. For example, despite previous assurances from management, neither Germany nor Brazil, with a combined population of approximately 260 million, have successfully implemented national coverage of certain Given Imaging products.
 
Weak Financial Performance
 
In addition to failing to generate organic growth, management has also failed to increase profitability and achieve operating efficiencies in the business. Aided by several acquisitions, revenue grew 27% between 2009 and 2012; yet the Company’s operating margin remained flat.
                                           
$ in thousands; FYE 12/31
    Fiscal Years Ending  
   
2006
   
2007
   
2008
   
2009
   
2010
   
2011
   
2012
 
                                           
Revenue
  $ 95,029     $ 112,868     $ 125,108     $ 141,763     $ 157,809     $ 177,955     $ 180,501  
Reported Growth
    9.5%       18.8%       10.8%       13.3%       11.3%       12.8%       1.4%  
Organic Growth
    9.5%       18.8%       10.1%       2.1%       (1.3%)       9.3%       1.1%  
                                                         
Cost of goods sold
    24,154       29,721       33,001       33,145       37,629       41,466       42,971  
Gross profit
    70,875       83,147       92,107       108,618       120,180       136,489       137,530  
Gross margin
    74.6%       73.7%       73.6%       76.6%       76.2%       76.7%       76.2%  
                                                         
Research and development, net of grants
    10,811       16,448       18,296       16,733       20,218       25,016       24,188  
% of sales
    11.4%       14.6%       14.6%       11.8%       12.8%       14.1%       13.4%  
Sales and marketing
    50,732       55,446       60,902       61,428       67,114       75,014       76,272  
% of sales
    53.4%       49.1%       48.7%       43.3%       42.5%       42.2%       42.3%  
General and administrative
    16,027       20,981       19,320       18,919       24,452       23,078       22,746  
% of sales
    16.9%       18.6%       15.4%       13.3%       15.5%       13.0%       12.6%  
Total operating expenses
    77,570       92,875       98,518       97,080       111,784       123,108       123,206  
% of sales
    81.6%       82.3%       78.7%       68.5%       70.8%       69.2%       68.3%  
                                                         
Operating profit
    (6,695)       (9,728)       (6,411)       11,538       8,396       13,381       14,324  
Operating margin
    (7.0%)       (8.6%)       (5.1%)       8.1%       5.3%       7.5%        7.9%  
 
Management asserts that Given Imaging is unique in that it has a global infrastructure that no other comparably-sized medical device company possesses. In a detailed analysis of dozens of large and small medical device firms which we shared with management, we found no meaningful difference in their respective geographic breakdown of revenue when compared to Given Imaging.
 
 
 

 

 
Board of Directors
Given Imaging Ltd.
Page 5
 
Loss of Management Credibility with Investors
 
The Company’s public market valuation has also been severely hampered by repeatedly mismanaging expectations with respect to future financial performance. Given Imaging has either missed guidance or revised guidance downward in five of the seven fiscal years that Mr. Shamir has been CEO. Just recently, the Company significantly missed its Q4 2012 guidance (roughly 15% revenue miss) and drastically underperformed expectations during Q1 2013.
 
Revision
                     
% Below Initial
Date
 
Period
 
Measure
 
Initial Guidance
 
Revision
 
Actual
 
Guidance Mid-point
07/26/06
 
FY2006
 
Revenue
 
$110M - $120M
 
$92M - $97M
 
$95M
 
-17%
                         
10/31/07
 
FY2007
 
Revenue
 
$114M - $119M
 
$109M - $112M
 
$112.9M
 
-3%
                         
11/11/08
 
FY2008
 
Revenue
 
$130M - $136M
 
$125M
 
$125.1M
 
-6%
11/11/08
 
FY2008
 
GAAP EPS
 
$0.34 - $0.42
 
$0.25
 
$0.13
 
-66%
                         
11/03/10
 
FY2010
 
Revenue
 
$167M - $174M
 
$154M - $157M
 
$157.8M
 
-7%
11/03/10
 
FY2010
 
GAAP EPS
 
$0.44 - $0.52
 
$0.18 - $0.23
 
$0.28
 
-42%
 
Management also publicized long-term P&L targets in 2011 that they now concede will be tough to achieve and significantly overpromised on the timing with respect to commercialization of the colonoscopy opportunity. Finally, after growing revenue only 4.3% in the first half of 2013, Given Imaging will need record revenue growth of 16.7% in the second half to hit the mid-point of its guidance. Based on recent history, we are expecting another disappointment.
 
This repeated history of not delivering on financial targets undermines the Company’s credibility with investors. In fact, during the past two years almost all of Given Imaging’s top-ten shareholders have either lowered or completely exited their respective ownership stakes in the Company. IDB Holding Corporation, which owns roughly 49% of common stock, also recently attempted to sell its stake.
 
Inefficient Capital Structure
 
Given Imaging is carrying an excessive amount of cash on its balance sheet, approximately $130 million or 21% of the Company’s market capitalization. The excess cash is especially acute when considering Given Imaging routinely generates annual operating cash flow in excess of $20 million. Carrying a large cash balance implies a lack of management confidence in future performance and/or a lack of regard for shareholder resources.
 
 
 

 

 
Board of Directors
Given Imaging Ltd.
Page 6

     
Share
   
Market
   
Enterprise
                     
Net Cash /
 
Company
Ticker
 
Price
   
Value
   
Value
   
Cash
   
Debt
   
Net Cash
   
Market Cap
 
                                             
Given Imaging Ltd.
GIVN
  $ 19.21     $ 608.1     $ 479.1     $ 130.3     $ 1.2     $ 129.0       21 %
                                                           
Large Cap Med Device
                                                         
Johnson & Johnson
JNJ
  $ 86.73     $ 244,411.5     $ 242,908.5     $ 25,481.0     $ 23,978.0     $ 1,503.0       1 %
Abbott Laboratories
ABT
    33.14       51,503.7       56,017.3       9,651.9       14,073.9       (4,422.0 )     -9 %
Medtronic, Inc.
MDT
    53.00       52,865.8       51,644.8       12,416.0       11,195.0       1,221.0       2 %
Covidien plc
COV
    60.96       28,041.5       30,998.5       2,119.0       5,076.0       (2,957.0 )     -11 %
Stryker Corporation
SYK
    67.65       25,580.6       23,637.6       4,714.0       2,771.0       1,943.0       8 %
St. Jude Medical Inc.
STJ
    52.39       15,046.0       17,289.0       1,610.0       3,613.0       (2,003.0 )     -13 %
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
ZMH
    82.30       13,953.9       14,390.1       1,255.6       1,688.1       (432.5 )     -3 %
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
ISRG
    367.46       14,591.8       11,761.3       3,027.2       196.7       2,830.5       19 %
CR Bard Inc.
BCR
    115.74       9,161.2       9,774.8       869.5       1,483.1       (613.6 )     -7 %
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
EW
    68.79       7,723.3       7,353.7       596.9       227.3       369.6       5 %
                                                           
                     
Mean
    $ 6,174.1     $ 6,430.2     ($ 256.1 )     -1 %
                     
Median
    $ 2,573.1     $ 3,192.0     ($ 31.5 )     -1 %
                                                           
Small Cap Med Device
                                                         
DexCom, Inc.
DXCM
  $ 27.23     $ 1,943.6     $ 1,904.9     $ 46.4     $ 7.7     $ 38.7       2 %
Thoratec Corp.
THOR
    36.92       2,123.9       1,850.7       273.2       0.0       273.2       13 %
Volcano Corporation
VOLC
    23.68       1,292.7       1,198.8       500.9       407.1       93.9       7 %
Endologix Inc.
ELGX
    15.98       1,008.8       969.0       39.8       0.0       39.8       4 %
Abaxis, Inc.
ABAX
    41.47       925.6       824.9       106.5       5.9       100.6       11 %
Luminex Corporation
LMNX
    20.12       832.8       793.5       48.1       8.7       39.4       5 %
ABIOMED, Inc.
ABMD
    18.75       709.6       624.8       88.8       4.0       84.8       12 %
MAKO Surgical Corp.
MAKO
    29.48       1,386.4       1,330.0       67.1       10.7       56.4       4 %
The Spectranetics Corporation
SPNC
    16.61       678.1       560.7       119.4       1.9       117.4       17 %
AtriCure, Inc.
ATRC
    10.96       229.9       202.4       34.9       7.4       27.5       12 %
                                                           
                     
Mean
    $ 132.5     $ 45.3     $ 87.2       9 %
                     
Median
    $ 78.0     $ 6.6     $ 70.6        9 %
 
Given Imaging has repeatedly resisted calls to return excess cash to shareholders, citing potential tax ramifications. However, according to management the Company can utilize the recently-enacted “Trapped Profits Law” to return up to $50 million to shareholders while only incurring a 10% tax payment.
 
Path to Value Recognition
 
After patiently waiting several years for better management performance and for Given Imaging to achieve its potential in the public markets, we feel the time has arrived for the Board to take decisive action. To remedy the situation, Discovery Group strongly recommends that the Board take the following steps to achieve the Company’s true intrinsic value: (1) stop hoarding cash and instead return the capital to shareholders; and (2) conduct a comprehensive and competitive sale process to solicit bids for the Company.
 
Step 1 – Share Repurchase: The Company should utilize the “Trapped Profits Law” to return $50 million to shareholders. Even with the one-time tax payment of 10%, either a dividend or a share repurchase is preferred to the current capital structure. At the very least, it guarantees a partial return of capital to shareholders in the event management and the Board fail to consummate a sale.
 
Our preference is for a fixed-price tender offer or Dutch Auction share repurchase, with either option having numerous benefits. A share repurchase allows individual shareholders to decide whether or not to participate. For those that choose to participate and sell shares, it reduces their respective risk and provides capital to invest in competing opportunities. For those shareholders that choose not to participate, a share repurchase accretes their ownership position, resulting in a higher return when the Company ultimately pursues a value recognition event such as a change-of-control.
 
 
 

 

 
Board of Directors
Given Imaging Ltd.
Page 7
 
It is important to note that we are not advocating a share repurchase plan with the hopes of increasing Given Imaging’s stock price. Instead, we are calling for a more efficient capital structure which will optimize the financial return in a change-of-control transaction. In an eventual sale of the Company, acquirers will not pay a premium for excess cash sitting on the balance sheet. Therefore, the overall reported premium paid for Given Imaging would be low unless the excess cash is disgorged.
 
According to management, Given Imaging has until November 15, 2013 to utilize the “Trapped Profit Law”. We vigorously implore the Board to exercise sound financial judgment in returning a portion of the Company’s excess cash to shareholders.
 
Step 2 – Proper Change-of-Control Process: Given Imaging ran a sale process in late 2012 and early 2013 at the behest of IDB Holding Corporation that we believe was limited in scope and half-hearted. Considering the circumstances – IDB Holding Corporation’s perceived financial condition, recent history of guidance misses, pending regulatory approvals – we agree with management that the timing was not ideal. However, we believe the proper time for an earnest sale process is now upon us.
 
Given Imaging recently received regulatory approval for PillCam COLON in Japan and is anticipating reimbursement coverage in early 2014. The Company received FDA approval and Japanese regulatory approval for the PillCam SB3 in August 2013 and September 2013, respectively. The Company is also expecting FDA approval for PillCam COLON prior to year-end. Once Given Imaging receives this final regulatory approval, it should conduct a full and thorough auction, which will allow an efficient market to develop for the Company’s true value. This process should include both direct competitors and additional medical device companies, as well as pharmaceutical companies that already focus on the gastrointestinal and/or oncology markets. It is imperative for the Board to recognize that a change-of-control transaction will eliminate the execution risks that have repeatedly plagued Given Imaging in the past several years.
 
The differential between the Company’s current value and a potential change-of-control value is significant. As shown in the table below, which excludes the impact of our proposed share repurchase, Given Imaging could reasonably achieve a value of $26 to $30 per share from a strategic buyer. This valuation is comprised of two elements: roughly $22 to $26 per share for the existing business, and a potential incremental $4 per share for the Crohn’s and colonoscopy opportunities. At the mid-point, the expected change-of-control value equates to a 45+% premium to the current stock price and almost 6.0x the Company’s LTM Gross Profit.
 
 
 

 

 
Board of Directors
Given Imaging Ltd.
Page 8
 
(BAR CHART)
 
We believe a change-of-control transaction provides an attractive value for shareholders while also eliminating continued execution risk. It is important the Board maintains a realistic view of the amount a strategic buyer is willing to pay. As discussed earlier, a strategic buyer will only pay 100 cents on the dollar for cash on the balance sheet. In addition, a strategic buyer will unlikely pay full value for the Crohn’s and colonoscopy market opportunities as it will be implementing the commercialization strategy and bearing the corresponding risk.
 
Conclusion
 
Discovery Group believes that Given Imaging possesses best-in-class technology and participates in a market that has significant long-term growth potential. However, it is our strong opinion that the Company has been mismanaged and its intrinsic value will not be recognized in the public markets. By returning excess capital to shareholders and engaging in a competitive sale process, shareholders will achieve an outcome that we believe is far superior to, and presents significantly less risk, than the status quo.
 
We have held discussions with potential strategic buyers. Consistent with our observations, these companies recognize the same missed opportunities and failed management. Most importantly, the strategic buyers also recognize the compelling opportunity which still exists and are eager to participate in a formal and legitimate sale process. Absent the commencement of a share repurchase and proactive sale process, Discovery Group will withhold support for the Board, management, and approval for matters put to proxy votes and will urge other shareholders to do the same.
 
 
 

 

 
Board of Directors
Given Imaging Ltd.
Page 9
 
We are requesting a formal response from the Board acknowledging the receipt of this letter and initial feedback on our proposals. We are available to answer any questions and are anxious to discuss our analysis in greater detail.
 
Sincerely,
 
/s/ Mark Buckley  
Mark Buckley
Partner