10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file number: 000-31711

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia	54-1980794
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1325 Tappahannock Boulevard Tappahannock, VA	22560
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (804) 443-4343

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $5.00 Par

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨                    Accelerated Filer  ¨                    Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2006 was $35.8 million.

There were 1,209,081 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 26, 2007.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement dated April 13, 2007 to be delivered to shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 11, 2007, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

FORM 10-K

INDEX

PART 1

		Page
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	10
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	12
Item 2.	Properties	13
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	13
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	13
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	14
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	15
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	15
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	30
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	31
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	32
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	32
Item 9B.	Other Information	32
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	32
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	32
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	32
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	33
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	33
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	34

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. (the “Corporation”) owns all of the stock of its sole direct subsidiary, Bank of Essex (the “Bank”). The Corporation was incorporated under Virginia law in 2000 to become the holding company for the Bank. The headquarters of the Corporation is located in Tappahannock, Virginia. (References herein to the “Corporation” include the “Bank” and its subsidiary unless the context otherwise requires.)

The Bank was established in 1926 and is headquartered in Tappahannock, Virginia. The Bank operates six full-service offices in Virginia, engages in a general commercial banking business and provides a wide range of financial services primarily to individuals and small businesses, including individual and commercial demand and time deposit accounts, commercial and consumer loans, travelers checks, safe deposit box facilities, investment services and fixed rate residential mortgages. Two offices are located in Tappahannock, one in Central Garage, one in West Point, one in Hanover County and one in Henrico County, which is located near Virginia Center Commons, a large shopping center in Central Virginia.

Essex Services, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank and was formed to sell title insurance to the Bank’s mortgage loan customers. Essex Services, Inc. also offers insurance products through an ownership interest in Bankers Insurance, LLC and investment products through an affiliation with VBA Investments, LLC.

The Corporation recently constructed a new headquarters facility which is located at 1325 Tappahannock Boulevard, approximately one mile from its former Main Office at 323 Prince Street. Upon the opening of this office the Corporation simultaneously closed a branch bank located across the highway from the new headquarters and redesignated the current Main Office as a branch bank. The former Main Office also houses the Bank’s data processing department and loan processing center. The Corporation began operating from this new location and closed the branch bank on June 12, 2006.

Management believes that its most significant profitable growth opportunities will continue to be in the greater metropolitan areas within one hour of Tappahannock. Furthermore, management believes that the trend toward consolidation of the banking industry and the closings and acquisitions of financial institutions in the Corporation’s service area, and in particular the metropolitan areas, have created and will continue to create opportunities for the Corporation to grow its branching network and customer base in these markets.

The Corporation’s expansion efforts have contributed to its growth and improved profitability. Total assets have increased from $115.5 million at the end of 1996 to $281.4 million at December 31, 2006. Net income has grown from $947,000 in 1996 to $3.1 million in 2006. Diluted earnings per share were $1.01 in 1996 versus $2.58 in 2006.

1

The Corporation’s return on assets was 0.85% in 1996 and 1.15% in 2006. Return on equity was 10.57% in 1996 and 11.47% in 2006.

Loan growth since the Corporation expanded into metropolitan Richmond has come principally from rate sensitive commercial loans which have served to mitigate the Corporation’s interest rate risk. At the same time this growth in commercial loans has increased the Bank’s credit risk.

Employees

At December 31, 2006, the Corporation had 92 full-time equivalent employees. None of its employees is represented by any collective bargaining unit. The Corporation considers relations with its employees to be excellent.

SEC Filings

The Corporation maintains an internet website at www.bankofessex.com. This website contains information relating to the Corporation and its business. Shareholders of the Corporation and the public may access the Corporation’s periodic and current reports, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, through the “Investors” section of the Corporation’s website. The reports are made available on this website as soon as practicable following the filing of the reports with the SEC. This information is free of charge and may be reviewed, downloaded and printed from the website at any time.

Market Area

The Corporation’s six offices serve a diverse market from the edge of the City of Richmond in Hanover and Henrico Counties to Tappahannock, Virginia on the Rappahannock River in Essex County. From suburban Hanover and Henrico Counties, the market area is primarily rural along Route 360 through King William and King and Queen Counties into Essex County. The Corporation’s management believes Route 360 is a developing growth corridor from Richmond to the east. Tappahannock is approximately 40 miles from downtown Richmond and about one hour from Fredericksburg. Through its Tappahannock branches, the Corporation also serves the central portions of the Middle Peninsula and the upper Northern Neck of Virginia. Through its West Point office, the Corporation serves portions of the Middle Peninsula of Virginia.

The Corporation has made application with the State Corporation Commission’s Bureau of Financial Institutions and received approval to establish two branches in Northumberland County, Virginia. One location will be constructed in Callao and one in Burgess. Route 360 runs through Northumberland County, which is located in the Northern Neck of Virginia and has experienced significant growth in total deposits the last ten years as the area has evolved from an area dependent upon agricultural and industrial seafood production to a growing waterfront retirement community with associated service businesses.

2

Competition

Within the Richmond, Middle Peninsula and upper Northern Neck areas, the Corporation operates in a highly competitive environment, competing for deposits and loans with commercial corporations, savings and loans and other financial institutions, including non-bank competitors, many of which possess substantially greater financial resources than those available to the Corporation. Many of these institutions have significantly higher lending limits than the Corporation. In addition, there can be no assurance that other financial institutions, with substantially greater resources than the Corporation, will not establish operations in the Corporation’s service area. The financial services industry remains highly competitive and is constantly evolving.

In Essex County, the Corporation commands 45.5% of the deposits in the market, according to the most recently available survey of deposits by the FDIC (June 30, 2006). This represents the highest percentage of deposit market share in Essex County. Serving King William County, the branches at Central Garage and West Point have experienced steady growth, reaching 20.7% of the deposits in the King William County market as of the June 30, 2006 FDIC survey of deposits, while competing with previously established branches. The Corporation’s office located on Route 360 in eastern Hanover County had $41.3 million in total deposits on June 30, 2006. In Henrico County the Corporation’s office located near Virginia Center Commons Mall has experienced strong growth while competing against other community banks and established offices of statewide banks in the vicinity. This office had $36.4 million in total deposits on June 30, 2006.

Factors such as rates offered on loan and deposit products, types of products offered, the number and location of branch offices, as well as the reputation of institutions in the market, affect competition for loans and deposits. The Corporation emphasizes customer service, establishing long-term relationships with its customers, thereby creating customer loyalty, and providing adequate product lines for individuals and small-to-medium size business customers.

The Corporation would not be materially or adversely impacted by the loss of a single customer. The Corporation is not dependent upon a single or a few customers.

Supervision and Regulation

Bank holding companies and banks operate in a highly regulated environment and are regularly examined by federal and state regulators, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State Corporation Commission (the “SCC”). The following description briefly discusses certain provisions of federal and state laws and certain regulations and the potential impact of such provisions on the Corporation and the Bank. These federal and state laws and regulations have been enacted generally for the protection of depositors in national and state banks and not for the protection of stockholders of bank holding companies or banks.

3

Bank Holding Companies. The Corporation is registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), and, as a result, is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve has jurisdiction under the BHCA to approve any bank or nonbank acquisition, merger or consolidation proposed by a bank holding company. The BHCA generally limits the activities of a bank holding company and its subsidiaries to that of banking, managing or controlling banks, or any other activity, which is so closely related to banking or to managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Under the BHCA, the Corporation is subject to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve and is required to file periodic reports regarding its operations and any additional information the Federal Reserve may require.

Federal law permits bank holding companies from any state to acquire banks and bank holding companies located in any other state. The law allows interstate bank mergers, subject to “opt-in or opt-out” action by individual states. Virginia adopted early “opt-in” legislation that allows interstate bank mergers. These laws also permit interstate branch acquisitions and de novo branching in Virginia by out-of-state banks if reciprocal treatment is accorded Virginia banks in the state of the acquirer.

There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries by federal law and regulatory policy that are designed to reduce potential loss exposure to the depositor of such depository institutions and to the FDIC insurance fund in the event the depository institution becomes in danger of default or in default. For example, under a policy of the Federal Reserve with respect to bank holding company operations, a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so otherwise. In addition, the “cross-guarantee” provisions of federal law require insured depository institutions under common control to reimburse the FDIC for any loss suffered or reasonably anticipated by either the Savings Association Insurance Fund (“SAIF”) or the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) as a result of the default of a commonly controlled insured depository institution in danger of default. The FDIC may decline to enforce the cross-guarantee provisions if it determines that a waiver is in the best interest of the SAIF or the BIF or both. The FDIC’s claim for reimbursement is superior to claims of stockholders of the insured depository institution or its holding company but is subordinate to claims of depositors, secured creditors and holders of subordinated debt (other than affiliates) of the commonly controlled insured depository institution.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”) also provides that amounts received from the liquidation or other resolution of any insured depository institution by any receiver must be distributed (after payment of secured claims) to pay the deposit liabilities of the institution prior to payment of any other general or unsecured senior liability, subordinated liability, general creditor or stockholders in the event a receiver is appointed to distribute the assets of the Bank.

4

The Corporation was required to register in Virginia with the SCC under the financial institution holding company laws of Virginia. Accordingly, the Corporation is subject to regulation and supervision by the SCC.

The Corporation is also subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including but not limited to, filing annual, quarterly, and other current reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the “Act”) was enacted in November 1999. The Act draws new lines between the types of activities that are permitted for banking organizations that are financial in nature and those that are not permitted because they are commercial in nature. The Act imposes Community Reinvestment Act requirements on financial service organizations that seek to qualify for the expanded powers to engage in broader financial activities and affiliations with financial companies that the Act permits.

The Act created a new form of financial organization called a financial holding company that may own and control banks, insurance companies and securities firms. A financial holding company is authorized to engage in any activity that is financial in nature or incidental to an activity that is financial in nature or is a complementary activity. These activities include insurance, securities transactions and traditional banking related activities. The Act establishes a consultative and cooperative procedure between the Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the Treasury for the designation of new activities that are financial in nature within the scope of the activities permitted by the Act for a financial holding company. A financial holding company must satisfy special criteria to qualify for the expanded financial powers authorized by the Act. Among those criteria are requirements that all of the depository institutions owned by the financial holding company be rated as well-capitalized and well-managed and that all of its insured depository institutions have received a satisfactory ratio for Community Reinvestment Act compliance during their last examination. A bank holding company that does not qualify as a financial holding company under the Act is generally limited in the types of activities in which it may engage to those that the Federal Reserve has recognized as permissible for bank holding companies prior to the date of enactment of the Act. The Act also authorizes a state bank to have a financial subsidiary that engages as a principal in the same activities that are permitted for a financial subsidiary of a national bank if the state bank meets eligibility criteria and special conditions for maintaining the financial subsidiary.

The Act repealed the prohibition in the Glass-Steagall Act on bank affiliations with companies that are engaged primarily in securities underwriting activities. The Act authorizes a financial holding company to engage in a wide range of securities activities, including underwriting, broker/dealer activities and investment company and investment advisory activities.

The Act provides additional opportunities for financial holding companies to engage in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to an activity that is financial in nature or complementary thereto provided that any such financial holding company is willing to comply with the conditions, restrictions and limitations placed on financial holding companies contained in the Act and the regulations to be adopted under the Act.

5

Financial in nature activities include: securities underwriting, dealing and market making, sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies, insurance underwriting and agency, merchant banking, and activities that the Federal Reserve Board, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines from time to time to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be proper incidents thereto.

The Corporation has not elected to become a financial holding company under the Act.

Under the Act, federal banking regulators have adopted rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a nonaffiliated third party. Pursuant to these rules, effective July 1, 2001, financial institutions must provide: initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates; annual notices of their privacy policies to current customers; and a reasonable method for customers to “opt out” of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties. These privacy provisions affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors.

USA Patriot Act of 2001. In October 2001 the USA Patriot Act was enacted to facilitate information sharing among entities within the government and financial institutions to combat terrorist activities and to expose money laundering. The USA Patriot Act is considered a significant piece of banking law with regard to disclosure of information related to certain customer transactions. Financial institutions are permitted to share information with one another, after notifying the United States Department of the Treasury, in order to better identify and report to the federal government activities that may involve terrorist activities or money laundering. Under the USA Patriot Act financial institutions are obligated to establish anti-money laundering programs, including the development of a customer identification program and to review all customers against any list of the government that contains the manes of known or suspected terrorists. The USA Patriot Act does not have a material or adverse impact on the Bank’s products or service but compliance with this act creates a cost of compliance and a reporting obligation.

Capital Requirements. The Federal Reserve Board has issued risk-based and leverage capital guidelines applicable to banking organizations that it supervises. Under the risk-based capital requirements, the Corporation and the Bank are each generally required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) of 8%. At least half of the total capital must be composed of “Tier 1 Capital,” which is defined as common equity, retained earnings and qualifying perpetual preferred stock, less certain intangibles. The remainder may consist of “Tier 2 Capital,” which is defined as specific subordinated debt, some hybrid capital instruments and other qualifying preferred stock and a limited amount of the loan loss allowance. In addition, each of the federal banking regulatory agencies has established minimum leverage capital requirements for banking organizations. Under these requirements, banking organizations must maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average quarterly assets equal to 3% to 5%, subject to federal bank regulatory evaluation of an organization’s overall safety and soundness. In sum, the capital measures used by the federal banking regulators are:

• Total Capital ratio, which is the total of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital;

• Tier 1 Capital ratio; and

• Leverage ratio.

6

Under these regulations, a bank will be:

• “Well Capitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 6% or greater, and is not subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive by a federal bank regulatory agency to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure;

• “Adequately Capitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 4% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 4% or greater – or 3% in certain circumstances – and is not well capitalized;

• “Undercapitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of less than 8% or greater, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of less than 4% - or 3% in certain circumstances;

• “Significantly Undercapitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of less than 6%, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of less than 3%, or a leverage ratio of less than 3%; or

• “Critically Undercapitalized” if its tangible equity is equal to or less than 2% of average quarterly tangible assets.

The risk-based capital standards of the Federal Reserve Board explicitly identify concentrations of credit risk and the risk arising from non-traditional activities, as well as an institution’s ability to manage these risks, as important factors to be taken into account by the agency in assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy. The capital guidelines also provide that an institution’s exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates be considered by the agency as a factor in evaluating a banking organization’s capital adequacy.

The FDIC may take various corrective actions against any undercapitalized bank and any bank that fails to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or fails to implement a plan accepted by the FDIC. These powers include, but are not limited to, requiring the institution to be recapitalized, prohibiting asset growth, restricting interest rates paid, requiring prior approval of capital distributions by any bank holding company that controls the institution, requiring divestiture by the institution of its subsidiaries or by the holding company of the institution itself, requiring new election of directors, and requiring the dismissal of directors and officers. The Bank presently maintains sufficient capital to remain in compliance with these capital requirements.

Payment of Dividends. The Corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. The majority of the Corporation’s revenues are from dividends paid to the Corporation by the Bank. The Bank is subject to laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends it can pay. In addition, both the Corporation and the Bank are subject to various regulatory restrictions relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain capital at or above regulatory minimums. Banking regulators have indicated that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only if the organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Corporation does not expect that any of these laws, regulations or policies will materially affect the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Bank paid $900,000 in dividends to the Corporation.

7

The FDIC has the general authority to limit the dividends paid by insured banks if the payment is deemed an unsafe and unsound practice. The FDIC has indicated that paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsound and unsafe banking practice.

Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and related regulations, depository institutions have an affirmative obligation to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas, including low and moderate-income areas, consistent with safe and sound banking practice. CRA requires the adoption of a statement for each of its market areas describing the depository institution’s efforts to assist in its community’s credit needs. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance with CRA and are periodically assigned ratings in this regard. Banking regulators consider a depository institution’s CRA rating when reviewing applications to establish new branches, undertake new lines of business, and/or acquire part or all of another depository institution. An unsatisfactory rating can significantly delay or even prohibit regulatory approval of a proposed transaction by a bank holding company or its depository institution subsidiaries. The Corporation believes it is currently in compliance with CRA.

Fair Lending; Consumer Laws. In addition to CRA, other federal and state laws regulate various lending and consumer aspects of the banking business. Governmental agencies, including the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice, have become concerned that prospective borrowers experience discrimination in their efforts to obtain loans from depository and other lending institutions. These agencies have brought litigation against depository institutions alleging discrimination against borrowers. Many of these suits have been settled, in some cases for material sums, short of a full trial.

Recently, these governmental agencies have clarified what they consider to be lending discrimination and have specified various factors that they will use to determine the existence of lending discrimination under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, including evidence that a lender discriminated on a prohibited basis, evidence that a lender treated applicants differently based on prohibited factors in the absence of evidence that the treatment was the result of prejudice or a conscious intention to discriminate, and evidence that a lender applied an otherwise neutral non-discriminatory policy uniformly to all applicants, but the practice had a discriminatory effect, unless the practice could be justified as a business necessity.

Banks and other depository institutions also are subject to numerous consumer-oriented laws and regulations. These laws, which include the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act, require compliance by depository institutions with various disclosure requirements and requirements regulating the availability of funds after deposit or the making of some loans to customers.

8

Future Regulatory Uncertainty. Because federal regulation of financial institutions changes regularly and is the subject of constant legislative debate, the Corporation cannot forecast how federal regulation of financial institutions may change in the future and impact its operations. Although Congress in recent years has sought to reduce the regulatory burden on financial institutions with respect to the approval of specific transactions, the Corporation fully expects that the financial institution industry will remain heavily regulated in the near future and that additional laws or regulations may be adopted further regulating specific banking practices.

Credit Policies

The Corporation follows written policies and procedures to enhance management of credit risk. The loan portfolio is managed under a specifically defined credit process. This process includes formulation of portfolio management strategy, guidelines for underwriting standards and risk assessment, procedures for ongoing identification and management of credit deterioration, and regular portfolio reviews to estimate loss exposure and ascertain compliance with the Corporation’s policies. Lending authority is granted to individual lending officers with the current highest limit being $350,000 for either secured or unsecured loans. A Loan Committee compromised of five loan officers can approve credits of up to $500,000. Approval of such credits requires a majority vote of the Loan Committee. The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors, meeting monthly, can approve loans up to the Bank’s legal lending limit. The Board of Director meets monthly as well and it too may approve loans up to the Bank’s legal lending limit.

The Corporation’s management generally requires that secured loans have a loan-to-value ratio of 85% or less. Management believes that when a borrower has significant equity in the assets securing the loan, the borrower is less likely to default on the outstanding loan balance.

A major element of credit risk management is diversification. The Corporation’s objective is to maintain a diverse loan portfolio to minimize the impact of any single event or set of circumstances. Concentration parameters are based on factors of individual risk, policy constraints, economic conditions, collateral and product type.

Lending activities include a variety of consumer, real estate and commercial loans with a strong emphasis on serving the needs of customers within the Corporation’s market territory. Consumer loans are made primarily on a secured basis in the form of installment obligations or personal lines of credit. The focus of real estate lending is single family residential mortgages, but also includes home improvement loans, construction lending and home equity lines of credit. Commercial lending is provided to businesses seeking credit for working capital, the purchase of equipment and facilities and commercial development.

9

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

Our operations are subject to many risks that could adversely impact future financial condition and performance and thus, the market value of our common stock. From time to time, we may make forward-looking statements that relate to future revenues, expenses, loan losses, reserves, market condition(s), strategies or other events that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future. Forward-looking statements are based on our current views and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.

Set forth below are certain of the important risks we face and that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted by forward-looking statements. These risks are not the only ones we face. Our business could be affected by additional factors that are presently unknown to us or that we currently believe are not material.

Fluctuations in interest rates may affect profitability.

Our profitability and cash flows depend substantially upon net interest margin. Net interest margin is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments, and rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. The rates described above are highly sensitive to many factors not in our control, such as general economic conditions and policies of regulatory and governmental agencies. Changes in interest rates will affect net interest margin and thus profitability and cash flows. We attempt to manage our interest rate risk but cannot eliminate this risk.

Our profitability depends upon and may be affected by local economic conditions.

The general economic conditions in the markets in which we operate are a key component to our success. This comes from both the rural Middle Peninsula and urban Richmond markets in which we operate. Changes in the general economic conditions in these markets, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, unemployment or other factors beyond our control, may influence the rate of growth experienced for both loans and deposits and negatively affect financial condition, performance and profitability.

Our future success is dependent upon our ability to compete effectively in the highly competitive banking industry.

We compete for deposits, loans and other financial services in markets with numerous other banks, thrifts and financial institutions. There are many financial institutions in these markets that have been in business for many years and are significantly larger, have customer bases well established and have higher lending limits and greater financial resources.

Concentrations in loans secured by real estate may increase credit losses, which would have a negative affect on our financial results.

Many of our loans are secured by real estate (both commercial and residential) in our market area. A variety of loans secured by real estate are offered, including commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, real estate, construction, home equity, consumer and other loans. At December 31, 2006, approximately 85.3% of our loans were secured by real estate. A major change in the real estate market, such as deterioration in value of the property, or in the local or national economy, could adversely affect our customer’s ability to pay these loans, which in turn could adversely impact us.

If our allowance for loan losses becomes inadequate, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

An essential element of our business is to make loans. We maintain an allowance for loan losses that we believe is a reasonable estimate of known and inherent losses within the loan portfolio. Experience in the banking industry indicates that some portion of our loans may only be partially repaid or may never be repaid at all. Loan losses occur for many reasons beyond our control. Although we believe that we maintain our allowance for loan losses at a level adequate to absorb losses in our loan portfolio, estimates of loan losses are subjective and their accuracy may depend on the outcome of future events. We

10

may be required to make significant and unanticipated increases in the allowance for loan and lease losses during future periods, which could materially affect our financial position, results of operations and liquidity. Bank regulatory authorities, as an integral part of their respective supervisory functions, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. These regulatory authorities may require adjustments to the allowance for loan losses or may require recognition of additional loan losses or charge-offs based upon their own judgment. Any change in the allowance for loan losses or charge-offs required by bank regulatory authorities could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

Our profitability and the value of shareholder’s investments may suffer because of rapid and unpredictable changes in the highly regulated environment in which we operate.

We are subject to extensive supervision by several governmental regulatory agencies at the federal and state levels in the financial services area. Recently enacted, proposed and future legislation and regulations have had, and will continue to have, or may have a significant impact on the financial services industry. These regulations, which are generally intended to protect depositors and not shareholders, and the interpretation and application of them by federal and state regulators, are beyond our control, may change rapidly and unpredictably and can be expected to influence earnings and growth. Our success depends on our continued ability to maintain compliance with these regulations. Some of these regulations may increase costs and thus place other financial institutions that are not subject to similar regulation in stronger, more favorable competitive positions.

We depend on key personnel for success.

Our operating results and ability to adequately manage our growth and minimize loan and lease losses are highly dependent on the services, managerial abilities and performance of our current executive officers and other key personnel. We have an experienced management team that the Board of Directors believes is capable of managing and growing our operations. However, losses of or changes in our current executive officers or other key personnel and their responsibilities may disrupt our business and could adversely affect financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in retaining our current executive officers or other key personnel.

If additional capital were needed in the future to continue growth, we may not be able to obtain it on terms that are favorable. This could negatively affect performance and the value of our common stock.

Our business strategy calls for continued growth. It is anticipated that we will be able to support this growth through the generation of additional deposits at branch locations as well as investment opportunities. However, we may need to raise additional capital in the future to support continued growth and to maintain capital levels. The ability to raise capital through the sale of additional securities will depend primarily upon our financial condition and the condition of financial markets at that time. We may not be able to obtain additional capital in the amounts or on terms satisfactory to us. Our growth may be constrained if we are unable to raise additional capital as needed.

11

Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.

The accounting standard setters, including the FASB, SEC and other regulatory bodies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. These changes can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some instances, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF CO MMENTS

None.

12

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The principal office of the Corporation and the Bank is located at 1325 Tappahannock Boulevard, Tappahannock, Virginia 22560. The Bank operated a branch in the Tappahannock Towne Center in Tappahannock from 1981-2006. In November 1988, the Bank opened the King William office at Central Garage in King William County. The fourth facility, the East Hanover office, opened in August 1992, on Route 360 east of Mechanicsville in Hanover County. In February of 1996, the Bank opened its fifth office in West Point, Virginia in King William County. In June 1999, the Bank opened its sixth office in Henrico County near Virginia Center Commons. This office houses other lines of business such as the commercial loan department and fixed rate mortgages. In June of 1990, the Bank purchased land in Tappahannock, Virginia. An additional adjoining parcel was purchased in 2004 and the State Corporation Commission Bureau of Financial Institutions approved the building of a new facility that houses executive offices of the Corporation as well as a branch office. When this new facility opened the Tappahannock Towne Center Office was closed and sold. The new facility was opened on June 12, 2006. Simultaneous to the opening of the new Main Office the Prince Street Office was redesignated from the Main Office to a branch. In October of 2002 the Bank purchased a small parcel of land adjoining the King William Office.

The Corporation has made application with the State Corporation Commission’s Bureau of Financial Institutions and received approval to establish two branches in Northumberland County, Virginia. One location will be constructed in Callao and one in Burgess. The Corporation intends to establish temporary facilities on both of these sites and construct permanent full-service facilities adjacent to each temporary office.

The Corporation or the Bank owns all of its properties.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

In the course of its operations, the Corporation is party to various legal proceedings. Based upon information currently available, and after consultation with its general counsel, management believes that such legal proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There were no matters submitted to the stockholders for their vote during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.

13

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information. The Corporation’s Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market (formerly the Nasdaq Small Cap Market) under the symbol “BSXT”.

The following table indicates the high and low bid prices for the Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market for the quarterly periods indicated:

2006	High		Low
Fourth Quarter	$	32.09	$	30.73
Third Quarter		34.19		30.00
Second Quarter		35.27		31.64
First Quarter		37.50		34.39

2005	High		Low
Fourth Quarter	$	36.00	$	30.01
Third Quarter		32.00		30.01
Second Quarter		36.00		29.52
First Quarter		35.80		29.30

Holders. At December 31, 2006, there were 1,208,109 shares of Common Stock of the Corporation outstanding held by approximately 1,100 holders of record.

Dividends. The Corporation began paying cash dividends in 1944 and semi-annual cash dividends in 1989. Beginning in 2007, the Corporation intends to begin paying a quarterly cash dividend on the Common Stock when justified by the financial condition of the Corporation. The timing and amount of future dividends, if any, will depend on general business conditions encountered by the Corporation, its earnings, its financial condition and cash and capital requirements, governmental regulations and other such factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. The following table sets forth the semi-annual and total cash dividends paid per share for 2006 and 2005.

Year	1st Semi-Annual Dividend Paid per share		2nd Semi-Annual Dividend Paid Per share		Total Annual Dividends Paid per share
2006	$	0.38	$	0.39	$	0.77
2005	$	0.35	$	0.38	$	0.73

1) The Corporation has paid its semi-annual dividends in June and December. Beginning in 2007, the Corporation intends to pay a quarterly dividend in March, June, September and December.

14

Recent Sales of Unregistered Shares.

None.

Use of Proceeds.

Not Applicable.

Issuer Repurchases of Common Stock.

No shares were repurchased by or on behalf of the Corporation during the fourth quarter of 2006.

The following line graph compares the cumulative total return to the shareholders of the Corporation to the returns of the NASDAQ Composite Index, the SNL $250—$500 million Bank Index and the Russell 3000 for the last five years. The amounts in the table represent the value of the investment on December 31st of the year indicated, assuming $100 was initially invested on December 31, 2001 and the reinvestment of dividends.

	Period Ending
Index	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
BOE Financial Services of Virginia	100.00	113.93	164.75	182.46	224.04	200.12
NASDAQ Composite	100.00	68.76	103.67	113.16	115.57	127.58
SNL $250M-$500M Bank Index	100.00	128.95	186.31	211.46	224.51	234.58
Russell 3000	100.00	78.46	102.83	115.11	122.16	141.35

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Financial Data

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

As of and for the Years ended December 31,	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
STATEMENT OF INCOME INFORMATION
Interest income	$	16,734		$	14,343		$	12,875		$	13,071		$	13,741
Interest expense		6,972			4,469			3,606			4,073			5,695
Net interest income		9,762			9,874			9,269			8,998			8,046
Provsion for loan losses		125			240			305			700			1,208
Noninterest income		2,251			1,601			1,627			1,384			1,078
Noninterest expense		7,893			7,262			6,882			6,627			5,766
Income taxes		872			872			823			648			368
Net income	$	3,123		$	3,101		$	2,885		$	2,407		$	1,782
PER SHARE DATA
Net income, basic	$	2.60		$	2.60		$	2.43		$	2.04		$	1.52
Net income, diluted		2.58			2.58			2.42			2.03			1.51
Cash dividend		0.77			0.73			0.63			0.56			0.53
Book value at period end		23.22			21.90			20.76			19.37			18.12
Tangible book value at period end		22.78			21.36			20.10			18.61			17.25
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Total assets	$	281,378		$	261,931		$	237,126		$	231,840		$	228,111
Loans, net		194,491			180,207			157,471			158,381			161,722
Securities		60,516			56,581			58,788			53,147			46,568
Deposits		230,865			223,132			206,973			203,282			201,261
Stockholders’ equity		28,047			26,235			24,681			22,922			21,346
PERFORMANCE RATIOS
Return on average assets		1.15	%		1.24	%		1.23	%		1.04	%		0.80	%
Return on average equity		11.47	%		12.18	%		12.12	%		10.80	%		8.87	%
Net interest margin		4.23	%		4.55	%		4.54	%		4.45	%		4.13	%
Dividend payout		29.67	%		28.13	%		25.90	%		27.45	%		34.96	%
ASSET QUALITY RATIOS
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans		1.22	%		1.23	%		1.31	%		1.33	%		1.29	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming assets		136.67	%		118.93	%		68.13	%		122.57	%		87.76	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets		0.62	%		0.72	%		1.29	%		0.75	%		1.06	%
Net chargeoffs to average loans		-0.01	%		0.05	%		0.21	%		0.42	%		0.74	%
CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY RATIOS
Leverage		11.62	%		11.55	%		11.50	%		10.80	%		8.13	%
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital		15.35	%		14.76	%		15.31	%		13.70	%		10.42	%
Total Risk-Based Capital		16.35	%		15.67	%		16.49	%		14.88	%		11.59	%

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following discussion is intended to assist the readers in understanding and evaluating the financial condition and results of operation of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. (“the Corporation”) or (“BOE”). This review should be read in conjunction with the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This analysis provides an overview of the significant changes that occurred during the periods presented.

15

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General

The Corporation’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The financial information contained within our statements is, to a significant extent, based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. We use historical loss factors as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in our loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors that we use. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of our transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact our transactions could change.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (i) SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies, which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimatable and (ii) SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance. The use of these values is inherently subjective and our actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates.

The allowance for loan losses is increased by charges to income and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries). Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, and current economic conditions.

OVERVIEW

The Corporation’s strategic plan is directed toward the enhancement of its franchise value and operating profitability by increasing its asset size and expanding its customer base. The Corporation operates six full service offices mainly between its headquarters in Tappahannock, Virginia and along the U. S. 360 corridor to the Richmond, Virginia metropolitan market. Management believes that its most significant profitable growth opportunities will continue to be within one hour of Tappahannock. (See Part I, Item 1. Business, General for further explanation on the Corporation’s strategic plan.)

Year 2006 Compared to Year 2005

On December 31, 2006, the Corporation had total assets of $281.378 million, total loans of $196.891 million, total deposits of $230.865 million and total stockholder’s equity of $28.047 million. BOE had net income of $3.123 million in 2006, a $22,000, or 0.7% increase from $3.101 million in net income in 2005. This resulted in a return on average equity of 11.47% in 2006 compared to 12.18% in 2005. Return on average assets in 2006 was 1.15%, compared to 1.24% in 2005. BOE’s total loans increased 7.9%, or $14.435 million, in 2006 over 2005. Total loans were $196.891 million at December 31, 2006 compared to $182.456 million at December 31, 2005. Loan increases came from loans secured by real estate, including loans secured by 1 – 4 family properties and commercial lending. This is due to continued growth in and around the

16

corridor surrounding Richmond, Virginia, including the area in and around Essex County. At December 31, 2006, the ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.62% compared to 0.72% at December 31, 2005. Net recoveries to average loans were 0.01% in 2006 compared to net charge offs of 0.05% in 2005. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31, 2006 were $102,000 and $260,000 at December 31, 2005. The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses to period end loans at December 31, 2006 was 1.22% compared to 1.23% at December 31, 2005.

Year 2005 Compared to Year 2004

On December 31, 2005, the Corporation had total assets of $261.931 million, total loans of $182.456 million, total deposits of $223.132 million and total stockholder’s equity of $26.235 million. BOE had net income of $3.101 million in 2005, a $215,000, or 7.5% increase from $2.885 million in net income in 2004. This resulted in a return on average equity of 12.18% in 2005 compared to 12.12% in 2004. Return on average assets in 2005 was 1.24%, compared to 1.23% in 2004. BOE’s total loans increased 14.3%, or $22.896 million, in 2005 over 2004. Total loans were $182.456 million at December 31, 2005 compared to $159.560 million at December 31, 2004. Loan increases came from loans secured by real estate, including loans secured by 1 – 4 family properties, commercial real estate and construction lending. At December 31, 2005, the ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.72% compared to 1.29% at December 31, 2004. Net charge offs to average loans were 0.05% in 2005 compared to 0.21% in 2004. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31, 2005 were $260,000 and $100,000 at December 31, 2004. The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses to period end loans at December 31, 2005 was 1.23% compared to 1.31% at December 31, 2004.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

NET INCOME

Year 2006 Compared to Year 2005

BOE had net income of $3.123 million in 2006 compared to $3.101 million in 2005. This represented an increase of 0.7%, or $22,000. Diluted earnings per share in 2006 were $2.58, compared to diluted earnings per share in 2005 of $2.58. These earnings per share are based on average shares outstanding of 1,210,922 in 2006 and 1,203,725 in 2005. The increase in net income included a $490,000 increase in total profits (losses) on other properties resulting from a $485,000 gain on the sale of a bank building. Also improving net income was $160,000 in increases in other categories of noninterest income and a $115,000 reduction in provision for loan losses. Offsetting these increases in net income for 2006 compared to 2005 was a decrease of $112,000, or 1.1%, in net interest income. Comprising net interest income was a $2.391 million, or 16.7%, increase in interest income which was offset by an increase of $2.503 million, or 56.0%, in interest expenses caused by fierce competition among banks for funding and an inverted yield curve throughout much of 2006. Also affecting net income was an increase of $631,000, or 8.7%, in noninterest expenses, $93,000 of which was related to the opening of a new headquarters during 2006.

Year 2005 Compared to Year 2004

BOE had net income of $3.101 million in 2005 compared to $2.885 million in 2004. This represented an increase of 7.5%, or $215,000. Diluted earnings per share in 2005 were $2.58, compared to diluted earnings per share in 2004 of $2.42. These earnings per share are based on average shares outstanding of 1,203,725 in 2005 and 1,194,511 in 2004.

17

BOE’s profitability increased in 2005 in comparison to 2004 due to an increase of $605,000, or 6.5%, in net interest income. Net interest income increased from $9.269 million in 2004 to $9.874 million in 2005. Additionally, provision for loan losses decreased by $65,000, or 21.2%, in 2005 compared to 2004. Provision for loan losses was $240,000 in 2005 compared to $305,000 in 2004. Provision for loan losses decreased in 2005 compared to 2004 due to a reduction in net charged-off loans. Net charged-off loans were $80,000 in 2005 compared to $345,000 in 2004. This combination resulted in a net interest income after provision for loan losses increase of $670,000, or 7.5%.

Offsetting these increases in net income was a $380,000, or 5.5% increase for 2005 compared to 2004 in noninterest expenses. Noninterest expenses were $7.262 million in 2005 and $6.882 million in 2004. Also offsetting net income increases was an increase of $49,000, or 5.9%, in income tax expenses. Income tax expense totaled $872,000 in 2005 and $823,000 in 2004. Noninterest income decreased $26,000, or 1.6%, and was $1.601 million in 2005 compared to $1.627 million in 2004.

NET INTEREST INCOME

Year 2006 Compared to Year 2005

Net interest income is the major component of the Corporation’s earnings and is equal to the amount by which interest income exceeds interest expense. The Corporation’s earning assets are composed primarily of loans and securities, while deposits and short-term borrowings represent the major portion of interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the volume and mix of these assets and liabilities, as well as changes in the yields earned and rates paid, determine changes in net interest income.

Net interest income, on a fully tax equivalent basis, was $10.514 million in 2006, $53,000 less than the $10.567 million reported for 2005. The Corporation’s level of earning assets increased $16.169 million, or 7.0%, on average, in 2006 to $248.586 million compared to $232.417 million in 2005. Loans receivable were $189.837 million, on average, in 2006 compared to $172.367 million in 2005, an increase of $17.470 million, or 10.1%. The yield on loans receivable increased from 6.93% in 2005 to 7.52% in 2006. On a fully tax equivalent basis the yield on loans receivable increased $2.338 million in 2006, to $14.282 million in 2006 from $11.944 million in 2005. This represents an increase of 19.6%. Investment securities and federal funds sold decreased, on average, 2.2% in 2006 to $58.749 million, down from $60.050 million, on average, in 2005. The tax equivalent yield on investment securities, including equity securities and federal funds sold was 5.45% in 2006 compared to 5.15% in 2005. On a fully taxable equivalent basis, income on investment securities and federal funds sold income increased 3.6%, or $111,000, from $3.092 million in 2005 to $3.203 million in 2006. This earning asset rate and volume activity resulted in a yield on earning assets of 7.03% in 2006 based on $17.485 million in fully taxable equivalent income compared to 6.47% in 2005 based on $15.036 million in fully taxable equivalent income. This is a $2.449 million increase from 2005 to 2006, or 16.3%. The Corporation’s interest-bearing liabilities increased $20.413 million, on average, from $194.364 million in 2005 to $214.777 million in 2006, an increase of 10.5%. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased from 2.30% in 2005 to 3.25% in 2006.

18

The increase in yield on earning assets of 56 basis points coupled with the increased cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 95 basis points resulted in a net interest margin for the Corporation of 4.23% in 2006 compared to a net interest margin of 4.55% in 2005. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing the Corporation’s net interest income on a tax equivalent basis by the average earning assets. Volume increases in loans, coupled with higher rate and volume increases on interest-bearing liabilities resulted in a decrease in the interest spread. The Corporation’s net interest spread decreased 39 basis points from 4.17% in 2005 to 3.78% in 2006. Spread is calculated by subtracting the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from the yield on earning assets.

Year 2005 Compared to Year 2004

Net interest income, on a fully tax equivalent basis, was $10.567 million in 2005, 6.7% higher than the $9.902 million reported for 2004. The Corporation’s level of earning assets increased $14.368 million, or 6.6%, on average, in 2005 to $232.417 million compared to $218.049 million in 2004. Loans receivable were $172.367 million, on average, in 2005 compared to $162.507 million in 2004, an increase of $9.860 million, or 6.1%. The yield on loans receivable increased from 6.56% in 2004 to 6.93% in 2005. On a fully tax equivalent basis the yield on loans receivable increased $1.280 million in 2005, to $11.944 million in 2005 from $10.664 million in 2004. This represents an increase of 12.0%. Investment securities and federal funds sold increased, on average, 8.1% in 2005 to $60.050 million, up from $55.542 million, on average, in 2004. The tax equivalent yield on investment securities, including equity securities and federal funds sold was 5.15% in 2005 compared to 5.12% in 2004. On a fully taxable equivalent basis, income on investment securities and federal funds sold income increased 8.7%, or $248,000, from $2.844 million in 2004 to $3.092 million in 2005. This earning asset rate and volume activity resulted in a yield on earning assets of 6.47% in 2005 based on $15.036 million in fully taxable equivalent income compared to 6.19% in 2004 based on $13.508 million in fully taxable equivalent income. This is a $1.528 million increase from 2004 to 2005, or 11.3%. The Corporation’s interest-bearing liabilities increased $8.971 million, on average, from $185.393 million in 2004 to $194.364 million in 2005. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased from 1.95% in 2004 to 2.30% in 2005, an increase of 18.0%.

The increase in yield on earning assets of 28 basis points coupled with the increased cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 35 basis points resulted in a net interest margin for the Corporation of 4.55% in 2005 compared to a net interest margin of 4.54% in 2004. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing the Corporation’s net interest income on a tax equivalent basis by the average earning assets. Volume increases in loans and in securities, coupled with lower rate and volume increases in interest-bearing liabilities resulted in a decrease in the interest spread. The Corporation’s net interest spread decreased 8 basis points from 4.25% in 2004 to 4.17% in 2005. Spread is calculated by subtracting the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from the yield on earning assets.

BOE’s net interest margin is affected by changes in the amount and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as a “volume change.” It is also affected by changes in yields earned on earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds, referred to as a “rate change.” The following table sets forth for each category of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the average amounts outstanding, the interest earned or incurred on such amounts and the average rate earned or incurred for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. The

19

table also sets forth the average rate earned on total earning assets, the average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities, and the net interest margin on average total earning assets for the same periods.

AVERAGE BALANCES, INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSES, AND AVERAGE YIELDS AND RATES

Years Ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)

				2006							2005				2004
	AVERAGE BALANCE			INTEREST INCOME/EXPENSE		AVERAGE YIELD/RATE		AVERAGE BALANCE			INTEREST INCOME/EXPENSE		AVERAGE YIELD/RATE		AVERAGE BALANCE			INTEREST INCOME/EXPENSE		AVERAGE YIELD/RATE
Earning Assets:
Loans receivable	$	189,837			14,282	7.52	%	$	172,367			11,944	6.93	%	$	162,507		$	10,664	6.56	%
Securities, taxable(1)		20,546			951	4.63	%		22,714			965	4.25	%		20,232			890	4.40	%
Securities, non-taxable		35,274			2,091	5.93	%		34,849			2,039	5.85	%		31,448			1,861	5.92	%
Equity securities		1,484			84	5.66	%		1,039			49	4.72	%		935			40	4.28	%
Federal funds sold		1,445			77	5.33	%		1,448			39	2.69	%		2,927			53	1.81	%
Total earning assets	$	248,586		$	17,485	7.03	%	$	232,417		$	15,036	6.47	%	$	218,049		$	13,508	6.19	%
Non-Earning Assets:
Cash and due from banks		6,023							6,327							8,964
Allowance for loan losses		(2,339	)						(2,205	)						(2,060	)
Other assets		20,246							13,441							10,689
Total non-earning assets		23,930							17,563							17,593
Total assets	$	272,516						$	249,980						$	235,642
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Deposits:
Interest-bearing demand (NOW) deposits		26,218			90	0.34	%		28,872			99	0.34	%	$	27,387		$	95	0.35	%
Money market deposits		14,750			226	1.53	%		15,306			154	1.01	%		17,085			143	0.84	%
Savings deposits		21,143			179	0.85	%		23,857			190	0.80	%		22,767			174	0.76	%
Time deposits		135,760			5,560	4.10	%		116,592			3,542	3.04	%		112,749			2,987	2.65	%
Federal funds purchased		2,048			102	4.98	%		2,503			101	4.03	%		1,405			20	1.42	%
FHLB advances & other borrowings		14,858			814	5.48	%		7,234			382	5.29	%		4,000			187	4.68	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	214,777		$	6,971	3.25	%	$	194,364		$	4,469	2.30	%	$	185,393		$	3,606	1.95	%
Non-Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Demand deposits		28,259							28,730							25,139
Other liabilities		2,245							1,417							1,290
Total non-interest bearing liabilities		30,504							30,147							26,429
Total liabilities		245,281							224,511							211,822
Stockholders’ equity		27,235							25,469							23,820
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	272,516						$	249,980						$	235,642
Interest spread						3.78	%						4.17	%						4.25	%
Net interest margin				$	10,514	4.23	%				$	10,567	4.55	%				$	9,902	4.54	%

(1) Income and yields are reported on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a federal tax rate of 34%.

Net interest income is affected by both (1) changes in the interest rate spread (the difference between the weighted average yield on interest earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities) and (2) changes in volume (average balances of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities).

For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided regarding changes attributable to (1) changes in volume of balances outstanding (changes in volume multiplied by prior period interest rate) (2) changes in the interest earned or paid on the balances (changes in rate multiplied by prior period volume) and (3) a combination of changes in volume and rate allocated pro rata.

RATE AND VOLUME ANALYSIS

(Dollars in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to December 31, 2005 Increase (Decrease) Due to									Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to December 31, 2004 Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Rate			Volume			Total			Rate			Volume			Total
Interest Earned On:
Loans receivable	$	1,071		$	1,267		$	2,338		$	614		$	666		$	1,280
Securities, taxable	$	210		$	(224	)	$	(14	)		(29	)		104		$	75
Securities, non-taxable	$	26		$	25		$	52			(20	)		199		$	179
Equity securities	$	11		$	24		$	35			4			5		$	9
Federal funds sold	$	38		$	(0	)	$	38			382			(396	)	$	(14	)
Total interest income	$	1,356		$	1,092		$	2,448		$	951		$	578		$	1,529
Interest Paid On:
Interest bearing demand (NOW) deposits	$	(0	)	$	(9	)	$	(9	)	$	(1	)	$	5		$	4
Money market deposits	$	77		$	(5	)	$	72		$	23			(12	)	$	11
Savings deposits	$	13		$	(26	)	$	(12	)		8			9		$	16
Time deposits	$	1,371		$	647		$	2,018			450			105		$	555
Federal funds purchased	$	5		$	(4	)	$	1			57			24		$	81
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings	$	14		$	417		$	432			27			168		$	195
Total interest expense	$	1,480		$	1,020		$	2,500		$	564		$	299		$	862
Net interest income	$	(124	)	$	72		$	(52	)	$	387		$	279		$	667

INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

An important component of both earnings performance and liquidity is management of interest rate sensitivity. Interest rate sensitivity reflects the potential effect on net interest income of a movement in market interest rates. BOE is subject to interest rate sensitivity to the degree that its interest earning assets mature or reprice at a different time interval from that of its interest-bearing liabilities.

INTEREST SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

December 31, 2006 (Dollars in thousands)

	Maturing or Repricing In:
	< 3 Months			3-12 Months			Over 1 Year			Total
Interest-sensitive assets:
Cash	$	5,520		$	—		$	—		$	5,520
Loans		69,350			26,484			101,057			196,891
Securities		1,015			7,114			52,387			60,516
Total interest-sensitive assets	$	75,885		$	33,598		$	153,444		$	262,927
Interest-sensitive liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	—		$	—		$	27,809		$	27,809
Certificates of deposit		22,067			91,695			28,208			141,970
Interest-bearing checking, money market deposits, NOW and savings accounts		17,843			—			43,243			61,086
Federal funds purchased		3,207			—			—			3,207
FHLB advances		—			7,000			5,000			12,000
Trust Preferred Securities		—			—			4,124			4,124
Total interest sensitive liabilities	$	43,117		$	98,695		$	108,384		$	250,196
Period gap		32,768			(65,097	)		45,060			12,731
Cumulative gap		32,768			(32,329	)		12,731
Ratio of cumulative interest sensitive assets to interest sensitive liabilities		176.0	%		77.2	%		105.1	%
Ratio of cumulative gap to interest sensitive assets		12.5	%		-12.3	%		4.8	%

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

The provision for loan losses is charged to income to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management of the Corporation based on such factors as historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Corporation, the amount of non-performing assets, regulatory policies, generally accepted accounting principles, general economic conditions, and other factors related to the collectibility of loans in the Corporation’s portfolio.

The provision for loan losses was $125,000 in 2006, a decrease of $115,000, or 48.0%, compared to the $240,000 in provision for 2005. The provision for loan losses reflects a decrease in net charged-off loans in 2006. Charged-off loans were in a net recovery position in 2006 of $26,000 after charging off $138,000 and recovering a total of $164,000. This compares to $80,000 in net charge-offs in 2005 after charging off $159,000 in loans and recognizing $79,000 in recoveries.

Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. In view of the Corporation’s plans to continue its loan growth, management will continue to closely monitor the performance of its portfolio and make additional provisions as necessary.

20

NON-INTEREST INCOME

Non-interest income in 2006 was $2.250 million, an increase of 40.6%, or $650,000, from non-interest income of $1.601 million in 2005. Net gains (losses) on sale of premises and equipment was the largest component of this increase, $490,000. Of this amount, $485,000 was the result of the sale of a former branch banking facility. Net gains (losses) on sale of premises and equipment was a loss of $23,000 in 2005 compared to a gain of $467,000 in 2006. Other income increased $114,000, or 19.6%, and was $693,000 in 2006 compared to $579,000 in 2005. Service charge income increased 5.7%, or $56,000, and was $1.043 million in 2006 compared to $986,000 in 2005. Net gains on sales of loans was $61,000, an 8.9%, or $5,000, increase over the 2005 total of $56,000. Net security gains (losses) were $16,000 less in 2006 than 2005. Net security gains (losses) were a loss of $13,000 in 2006 compared to a gain of $3,000 in 2005.

Non-interest income in 2005 was $1.601 million, a decrease of $26,000, or 1.6%, from non-interest income of $1.627 million in 2004. Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $8,000, or 0.8%, to $986,000 in 2005 from $994,000 in 2004. Other income increased 25.4%, or $117,000, in 2005. Other income was $579,000 in 2005 and $462,000 in 2004. Securities gains were $3,000 in 2005, a $63,000 decrease from securities gains of $66,000 in 2004. Gains on sales of loans were $56,000 in 2005 and $57,000 in 2004, a $1,000 decrease. Net gains/(losses) on sales of other properties decreased $72,000, or 147.2%, from a $49,000 gain in 2004 to a $23,000 loss in 2005.

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

Non-interest expense was $7.893 million in 2006, a $631,000, or 8.7% increase, over non-interest expense of $7.262 million in 2005. Salaries were $3.247 million in 2006 and were the largest component of this increase, $193,000, or 6.3%, over salaries of $3.054 million in 2005. Employee benefits were up $152,000, or 15.5%, higher than employee benefits in 2005 of $982,000. This increase was due to continued increases in health industry costs provided to employees. Data processing expense of $555,000 in 2006 was 4.7%, or $25,000, higher than data processing expense of $530,000 in 2005. Other operating expenses of $1.499 million were $62,000, or 4.3%, higher than other operating expenses of $1.437 million in 2005. Bank franchise tax increased $16,000, or 7.3%, in 2006 and was $238,000 compared to $222,000 in 2005. Stationary and printing expenses increased $34,000, or 24.6%, and were $138,000 in 2005 compared to $172,000 in 2006. Furniture and equipment related expenses were $449,000 in 2006 compared to $415,000 in 2005, an increase of $34,000, or 8.2%. Postage expense increased $22,000, or 14.3%, and was $175,000 in 2006 compared to $153,000 in 2005. Occupancy expenses increased $93,000, or 28.0% and were $423,000 in 2006 compared to $330,000 in 2005.

Non-interest expense was $7.262 million in 2005, a $380,000, or 5.5%, increase, over non-interest expense of $6.882 million in 2004. Salaries were $3.054 million in 2005 and were the largest component of this increase, $196,000, or 6.9%, over salaries of $2.858 million in 2004. This increase was due to an increase in full-time equivalent employees from 88 in 2004 to 93 in 2005. Employee benefits were $982,000, up $178,000, or 22.1% higher than employee benefits in 2004 of $804,000. This increase was due to the increase in full-time equivalent employees described above and continued increases in health industry costs provided to employees. Data processing expense of $530,000 in 2005 was 12.4%, or $59,000, higher than data processing expense of $471,000 in 2004. Other operating expenses of $1.404 million were $32,000, or 2.3%, higher than other operating expenses of $1.437 million in 2004. Bank franchise tax increased $7,000, or 3.5%, in 2005 and was $222,000 compared to $214,000 in 2004.

21

Analysis of Financial Condition

Loan Portfolio

The loan portfolio is the largest category of the Corporation’s earning assets and is comprised of commercial loans, agricultural loans, real estate loans, home equity loans, construction loans, consumer loans, and participation loans with other financial institutions. The primary markets in which the Corporation makes loans include the counties of Essex, King and Queen, King William, Hanover, Henrico and the City of Richmond. The mix of the loan portfolio is weighted toward loans secured by real estate and commercial loans. In management’s opinion, there are no significant concentrations of credit with particular borrowers engaged in similar activities.

Net loans consist of total loans minus the allowance for loan losses, unearned discounts and deferred loan fees. The Corporation’s net loans were $194.491 million at December 31, 2006, representing an increase of 7.9%, or $14.284 million more than net loans of $180.207 million at December 31, 2005. The average balance of loans as a percentage of average earning assets was 76.4% in 2006, up slightly from 74.2% in 2005.

In the normal course of business, the Corporation makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities, which are disclosed but not reflected in the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report, including standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit. At December 31, 2006, commitments for standby letters of credit totaled $4.971 million and commitments to extend credit totaled $45.251 million. Commitments for standby letters of credit totaled $4.602 million at December 31, 2005 and commitments to extend credit totaled $40.381 million.

LOAN PORTFOLIO

December 31, (Dollars in thousands)

	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
Loans:
Commercial	$	22,934		$	22,873		$	23,534		$	26,099		$	33,428
Real Estate		138,008			121,296			103,387			106,212			121,570
Real Estate - construction		29,984			32,084			25,924			21,505			1,465
Installment & other		5,965			6,203			6,714			6,693			7,375
Total loans	$	196,891		$	182,456		$	159,559		$	160,509		$	163,838
Allowance for loan losses		(2,400	)		(2,249	)		(2,088	)		(2,128	)		(2,116	)
Net loans	$	194,491		$	180,207		$	157,471		$	158,381		$	161,722

Remaining Maturities of Selected Loan Catagories

	Commercial		Real Estate Construction
	( in thousands)
within one year	$	7,546	$	22,207
Variable Rate
One to five years	$	8,198	$	468
After five years	$	3,951		63
Total	$	12,149	$	531
Fixed Rate
One to five years	$	2,632	$	6,129
After five years	$	607	$	1,117
Total	$	3,239	$	7,246
Total Maturities	$	22,934	$	29,984

ASSET QUALITY

Generally, interest on loans is accrued and credited to income based upon the principal balance outstanding. It is typically the Corporation’s policy to discontinue the accrual of interest income and classify a loan on non-accrual when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more and the loan is not well-secured and in the process of collection, or when, in the opinion of management, principal or interest is not likely to be paid in accordance with the terms of the obligation.

The Corporation will generally charge-off loans after 120 days of delinquency unless they are adequately collateralized, in the process of collection and, based on a probable specific event, management believes that the loan will be repaid or brought current within a reasonable period of time. Loans will not be returned to accrual status until future payments of principal and interest appear certain. Interest accrued and unpaid at the time a loan is placed on non-accrual status is charged against interest income. Subsequent payments received are applied to the outstanding principal balance.

Real estate acquired by the Corporation as a result of foreclosure or in-substance foreclosure is classified as other real estate owned (“OREO”). Such real estate is recorded at the lower of cost or fair market value less estimated selling costs, and the estimated loss, if any, is charged to the allowance for loan losses at that time. Further

22

allowances for losses are recorded as charges to other expenses at the time management believes additional deterioration in value has occurred. The Corporation had no OREO at December 31, 2006 or 2005.

The Corporation’s credit policies generally require a loan-to-value ratio of 85% for secured loans. At December 31, 2006, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest totaled $102,000, of which $7,000 was secured by real estate and the remainder was secured and unsecured commercial and installment loans. As of December 31, 2005, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing totaled $260,000, all of which was secured by real estate and the remainder was secured and unsecured commercial and installment loans. Non-accrual loans at December 31, 2006 were $0 and at December 31, 2005 non-accrual loans were $174,000.

NON-PERFORMING ASSETS

December 31, (Dollars in thousands)

	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
Nonaccrual and impaired loans	$	1,756		$	1,891		$	3,065		$	1,737		$	2,411
Restructured loans		0			0			0			—			—
Total nonperforming loans	$	1,756		$	1,891		$	3,065		$	1,737		$	2,411
Foreclosed assets		0			0			0			—			—
Total nonperforming assets	$	1,756		$	1,891		$	3,065		$	1,737		$	2,411
Loans past due 90 or more days accruing interest	$	102		$	260		$	100		$	285		$	102
Nonperforming loans to total loans, at period end		0.89	%		1.04	%		1.92	%		1.08	%		1.47	%
Nonperforming assets to period end assets		0.62	%		0.72	%		1.29	%		0.75	%		1.06	%

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

In originating loans, the Corporation recognizes that credit losses will be experienced and the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, general economic conditions, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan and, in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the collateral for such loan. The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses based upon, among other things, historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Corporation, the amount of non-performing assets, regulatory policies, generally accepted accounting principles, general economic conditions, and other factors related to the collectibility of loans in the Corporation’s portfolios. In addition to general allowances, specific allowances are provided for individual loans when ultimate collection is considered questionable by management after reviewing the current status of loans, which are contractually past due and after considering the net realizable value of any collateral for the loan.

Management actively monitors the Corporation’s asset quality in a continuing effort to charge-off loans against the allowance for loan losses when appropriate and to provide specific loss allowances when necessary. Although management believes it uses the best information available to make determinations with respect to the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments may be necessary if economic conditions differ from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. As of December 31, 2006, the allowance for loan losses amounted to $2.400 million, or 1.22% of total loans. The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses was $2.249 million at December 31, 2005, or 1.23% of total loans.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing assets was 136.67% at December 31, 2006. The ratio of allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing assets at December 31, 2005 was 118.93%.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Years ended December 31, (Dollars in thousands)

	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
Balance, beginning of period	$	2,249		$	2,088		$	2,129		$	2,116		$	2,084
Less chargeoffs:
Commercial		0			35			128			613			943
Installment		138			124			265			203			262
Real estate		0			0			38			13			39
Total chargeoffs		138			159			431			829			1,244
Plus recoveries:
Commercial		103			15			24			98			17
Installment		59			54			55			44			51
Real estate		2			11			6			—			—
Total recoveries		164			80			85			142			68
Net chargeoffs		(26	)		79			346			687			1,176
Provision for loan losses		125			240			305			700			1,208
Balance, end of period	$	2,400		$	2,249		$	2,088		$	2,129		$	2,116
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans		1.22	%		1.23	%		1.31	%		1.33	%		1.29	%
Allowance for loan losses to non performing assets		136.67	%		118.93	%		614.12	%		122.57	%		87.76	%
Net chargeoffs to average loans		-0.01	%		0.05	%		0.21	%		0.42	%		0.74	%

ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

December 31, (Dollars in thousands)

	2006		Percent (1)		2005		Percent (1)		2004		Percent (1)		2003		Percent (1)		2002		Percent (1)
Commercial	$	437	11.6	%	$	524	12.5	%	$	428	14.7	%	$	346	16.3	%	$	432	20.4	%
Installment		188	3.1	%		141	3.4	%		180	4.2	%		89	4.2	%		95	4.5	%
Real Estate		1,775	85.3	%		1,584	84.1	%		1,480	81.1	%		1,694	79.6	%		1,589	75.1	%
	$	2,400	100.0	%	$	2,249	100.0	%	$	2,088	100.0	%	$	2,129	100.0	%	$	2,116	100.0	%

(1) Percent of loans in each category to total loans.

INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES

Securities available-for-sale are used as part of the Corporation’s interest rate risk management strategy and may be sold in response to interest rate, changes in prepayment risk, liquidity needs, the need to increase regulatory capital and other factors. The fair value of the Corporation’s securities available-for-sale totaled $55.963 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $52.393 million at December 31, 2005.

23

The Company is required to account for the effect of market changes in the value of securities available-for-sale (AFS) under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard #115 (SFAS 115). The market value of the December 31, 2006 securities available-for-sale portfolio was $54,000 less than the associated book value of these securities. On December 31, 2005 the market value of securities available-for-sale exceeded their book value by $121,000.

As of December 31, 2006 the book value of the available-for-sale investment portfolio increased $3.505 million, or 6.7%, from $52.514 million at December 31, 2005 to $56.018 million at December 31, 2006.

SECURITIES PORTFOLIO

(Dollars in thousands)

	2006				2005				2004
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Held-to-Maturity:
U.S. Treasury Issue and other U.S. Government agencies	$	3,000	$	2,949	$	3,000	$	2,933	$	3,000	$	3,000
State, county and municipal		0		0		0		0		0		0
Other		0		0		0		0		0		0
Total Held-to-Maturity	$	3,000	$	2,949	$	3,000	$	2,933	$	3,000	$	3,000
	2006				2005				2004
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-Sale
U.S. Treasury Issue and other U.S. Government agencies	$	16,373	$	16,105	$	14,633	$	14,233	$	17,129	$	17,057
State, county and municipal		38,299		38,226		36,834		36,849		33,720		34,733
Other		1,346		1,632		1,047		1,311		2,904		3,185
Total Available-for-Sale	$	56,018	$	55,963	$	52,514	$	52,393	$	53,753	$	54,955

SECURITIES PORTFOLIO - MATURITY AND YIELDS

December 31, 2006 (Dollars in thousands)

	Under 1 Year			1 to 5 Years			5 to 10 Years			Over 10 Years			Total
Maturity Distribution:
U.S. Treasury Issue and other U.S. Government agencies	$	4,528		$	10,278		$	1,299		$	3,000		$	19,105
State, county and municipal-tax exempt		4,338			16,455			14,294			1,276			36,363
State, county and municipal-taxable		203			1,323			337			—			1,863
Other		—			1,289			—			343			1,632
Total Investment Securities	$	9,069		$	29,345		$	15,930		$	4,619		$	58,963
Weighted Average Yield:
U.S. Treasury Issue and other U.S. Government agencies		4.43	%		4.07	%		5.49	%		6.00	%		4.55	%
State, county and municipal-tax exempt		5.65	%		5.58	%		5.29	%		5.69	%		5.48	%
State, county and municipal-taxable		5.00	%		5.25	%		4.65	%		0.00	%		5.12	%
Other		0.00	%		6.01	%		0.00	%		4.36	%		5.66	%
Weighted Average Yield by Category		5.03	%		5.06	%		5.29	%		5.79	%		5.17	%

DEPOSITS

The Corporation primarily uses deposits to fund its loans and investment portfolio. In 2006, the Corporation’s deposits grew $7.733 million, or 3.5%. Total deposits at December 31, 2006 were $230.865 million compared to $223.132 million at December 31, 2005. Certificates of deposit increased $14.359 million, or 11.3%, from $127.545 million at December 31, 2005 to $141.910 million at December 31, 2006. This was the largest component of growth in deposits in 2006. Non-interest bearing deposits were $27.809 million at December 31, 2006, a $2.982 million, or 9.7%, decrease from $30.791 million at December 31, 2005. Additionally, there was a $2.048 million, or 9.2%, decrease in savings deposits. Savings deposits were $20.103 million at December 31, 2006 compared to $22.151 million at December 31, 2005. NOW accounts decreased $706,000, or 2.6%, from $27.689 million at December 31, 2005 to $26.983 million at December 31, 2006. Money Market Deposit Accounts (MMDA) decreased $889,000, or 5.9%, from $14.955 million at December 31, 2005 to $14.066 million at December 31, 2006.

In 2005, the Corporation’s deposits grew $16.159 million, or 7.8%. Total deposits at December 31, 2005 were $223.132 million compared to $206.973 million at December 31, 2004. Certificates of deposit increased $14.243 million, or 12.6%, from $113.302 million at December 31, 2004 to $127.545 million at December 31, 2005. This was the largest component of growth in deposits in 2005. Non-interest bearing demand deposits were the only other deposit category experiencing growth in 2005. Non-interest bearing deposits were $30.791 million at December 31, 2005, a $5.186 million, or 20.3%, increase from $25.605 million at December 31, 2004. Offsetting these increases to deposit growth was a $3.165 million, or 12.5%, decrease in savings deposits. Savings deposits were $25.316 million at December 31, 2004 compared to $22.151 million at December 31, 2005. NOW accounts decreased $337,000, or 1.2%, from $28.026 million at December 31, 2004 to $27.689 million at December 31, 2005. Money Market Deposit Accounts (MMDA) increased $232,000, or 1.6%, from $14.723 million at December 31, 2004 to $14.955 million at December 31, 2005.

The Corporation offers a variety of deposit accounts to individuals and small-to-medium sized businesses. Deposit accounts include checking, savings, money market deposit accounts and certificates of deposit. Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more totaled $43.980 million at December 31, 2006 and $39.864 million at December 31, 2005, an increase of $8.774 million, or 22.0%.

AVERAGE DEPOSITS AND AVERAGE RATES PAID

(Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,	2006				2005				2004
	Average Balance		Average Rate		Average Balance		Average Rate		Average Balance		Average Rate
Interest bearing deposits:
NOW accounts	$	26,218	0.34	%	$	28,872	0.34	%	$	27,387	0.35	%
Money market deposits		14,750	1.53	%		15,306	1.01	%		17,085	0.84	%
Regular savings		21,143	0.85	%		23,857	0.80	%		22,767	0.76	%
Certificates of deposit		135,760	4.10	%		116,592	3.04	%		112,749	2.65	%
Total interest bearing deposits	$	197,871	3.06	%	$	184,627	2.16	%	$	179,988	1.89	%
Noninterest bearing deposits		28,259				28,730				25,139
Total deposits	$	226,130			$	213,357			$	205,127

24

MATURITIES OF CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT OF $100,000 OR MORE

AT DECEMBER 31, 2006

(Dollars in thousands)

	Dollars		Percent
Three months or less	$	10,141	23.06	%
Over three months to six months		8,883	20.20	%
Over six months to one year		17,228	39.17	%
Over one year		7,728	17.57	%
	$	43,980	100.00	%

SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

BOE occasionally finds it necessary to purchase funds on a short-term basis due to fluctuations in loan and deposit levels. BOE has several arrangements under which it may purchase funds. Federal Funds guidance facilities are maintained with correspondent banks totaling $16.500 million for the year ending December 31, 2006. $3.207 million was drawn on these facilities at December 31, 2005. As another means of borrowing funds, BOE may borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Total expense on Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta borrowings in 2006 was $476,000 and in 2005 was $119,000. Total expense on Federal Funds purchased and other borrowings was $102,000 in 2006 and $101,000 in 2005.

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

The determination of capital adequacy depends upon a number of factors, such as asset quality, liquidity, earnings, growth trends and economic conditions. The Corporation seeks to maintain a strong capital base to support its growth and expansion plans, provide stability to current operations and promote public confidence in the Corporation.

The Corporation’s capital position exceeds all regulatory minimums. The federal banking regulators have defined three tests for assessing the capital strength and adequacy of banks, based on two definitions of capital. “Tier 1 Capital” is defined as a combination of common and qualifying preferred stockholders’ equity less goodwill. “Tier 2 Capital” is defined as qualifying subordinated debt and a portion of the allowance for loan losses. “Total Capital” is defined as Tier 1 Capital plus Tier 2 Capital. Three risk-based capital ratios are computed using the above capital definitions, total assets and risk-weighted assets and are measured against regulatory minimums to ascertain adequacy. All assets and off-balance sheet risk items are grouped into categories according to degree of risk and assigned a risk-weighting and the resulting total is risk-weighted assets. “Total Risk-based Capital” is Total Capital divided by risk-weighted assets. The Leverage ratio is Tier 1 Capital divided by total average assets.

During the fourth quarter of 2003 the Company engaged in a trust preferred offering, raising $4.124 million in trust preferred subordinated debt which qualifies as capital for regulatory purposes. This trust preferred debt has a 30-year maturity with a 5-year call option and was issued at a rate of three month LIBOR plus 3.00% for a weighted average rate of 8.10% during 2006.

The following table shows the Corporation’s capital ratios:

CAPITAL RATIOS

December 31,

	2006		2005		2004
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital	15.35	%	14.76	%	15.31	%
Total Risk-based Capital	16.35	%	15.67	%	16.49	%
Leverage Ratio	11.62	%	11.55	%	11.50	%

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity represents the Corporation’s ability to meet present and future financial obligations through either the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds through liability management. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold, and certain investment securities. As a result of the Corporation’s management of liquid assets and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes that the Corporation maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its depositors’ requirements and meet its customer’s credit needs.

25

As of December 31, 2006, cash, federal funds sold and available-for-sale securities represented 25.90% of deposits and other liabilities compared to 26.37% at December 31, 2005. Managing loan maturities also provides asset liquidity. At December 31, 2006 approximately $95.834 in loans would mature or reprice with a one-year period.

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s liquid assets for the periods indicated:

SUMMARY OF LIQUID ASSETS

December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)

	2006			2005			2004
Cash and due from banks	$	5,520		$	7,365		$	4,354
Federal funds sold		0			0			5,064
Available for sale securities, at fair value		55,963			52,393			54,955
Total liquid assets	$	61,483		$	59,758		$	64,373
Deposits and other liabilities	$	237,358		$	226,572		$	208,657
Ratio of liquid assets to deposits and other liabilities		25.90	%		26.37	%		30.85	%

FINANCIAL RATIOS

Financial ratios give investors a way to compare Corporation’s within industries to analyze financial performance. Return on average assets is net income as a percentage of average total assets. It is a key profitability ratio that indicates how effectively a bank has used its total resources. Return on average assets was 1.15% in 2006 and 1.24% in 2005. Return on average equity is net income as a percentage of average shareholders’ equity. It provides a measure of how productively a Corporation’s equity has been employed. BOE’s return on average equity was 11.47% in 2006 and 12.18% in 2005. Dividend payout ratio is the percentage of net income paid to shareholders as cash dividends during a given period. It is computed by dividing dividends per share by net income per share. BOE has a dividend payout ratio of 29.67% in 2006 and 28.13% in 2005. The Corporation utilizes leverage within guidelines prescribed by federal banking regulators as described in the section “Capital Requirements” in the preceding section. Leverage is average stockholders’ equity divided by total quarterly average assets. This ratio was 9.99% in 2006 and 10.19% in 2005.

FINANCIAL RATIOS

Years ended December 31,

	2006		2005		2004
Return on average assets	1.15	%	1.24	%	1.23	%
Return on average equity	11.47	%	12.18	%	12.12	%
Dividend payout ratio	29.67	%	28.13	%	25.90	%
Average equity to average asset ratio	9.99	%	10.19	%	10.11	%

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK AND CREDIT RISK AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its clients and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Bank has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

A summary of the contract amount of the Bank’s exposure to off-balance-sheet risk as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, is as follows:

	2006		2005
(In thousands)
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$	45,251	$	40,381
Standby letters of credit		4,971		4,602

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a client as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each client’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing clients. Those lines of credit may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Bank is committed.

26

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a client to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to clients. The Bank holds certificates of deposit, deposit accounts, and real estate as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.

A summary of the Corporation’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2006 is as follows:

	Payment Due by Period
	(In thousands)
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Federal Funds Purchased	$	3,207	$	3,207	$	0	$	0	$	0
FHLB Advances		12,000		7,000		0		0		5,000
Trust Preferred Capital Notes		4,124		—		—		—		4,124
Total Obligations	$	19,331	$	10,207	$	0	$	0	$	9,124

The Company does not have any capital lease obligations, as classified under applicable FASB statements, or other purchase or long-term obligations.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108). SAB 108 expresses the SEC staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 expresses the SEC staff’s view that a registrants materiality evaluation of an identified unadjusted error should quantify the effects of the error on each financial statement and related financial statement disclosures and that prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements. SAB 108 also states that correcting prior year financial statements for immaterial errors would not require previously filed reports to be amended. Such correction may be made the next time the registrant files the prior year financial statements. The cumulative effect of the initial application should be reported in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that fiscal year and the offsetting adjustment should be made to the

27

opening balance of retained earnings for that year. Registrants will disclose the nature and amount of each individual error being corrected in the cumulative adjustment. The SEC staff encourages early application of the guidance in SAB 108 for interim periods of the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. period ended December 31, 2006, the Corporation does not anticipate the implementation of SAB 108 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” (SFAS 155). SFAS 155 permits fair value measurement of any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. The Statement also clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement 133. It establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation. SFAS 155 also clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Corporation does not expect the implementation of SFAS 155 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (SFAS 156). SFAS 156 requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into certain servicing contracts. The Statement also requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. SFAS 156 permits an entity to choose between the amortization and fair value methods for subsequent measurements. At initial adoption, the Statement permits a one-time reclassification of available for sale securities to trading securities by entities with recognized servicing rights. SFAS 156 also requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the statement of financial position and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Corporation does not expect the implementation of SFAS 156 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but may change current practice for some entities. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those years. The Corporation does not expect the implementation of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

28

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. The funded status of a benefit plan will be measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the benefit obligation. For a pension plan, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation. For any other postretirement plan, the benefit obligation is the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. SFAS 158 also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position. The Statement also requires additional disclosure in the notes to financial statements about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. The Corporation is required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employers’ fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. See Note 8 for more information on the impact of SFAS 158.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109. The Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement principles for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return that are not certain to be realized. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Corporation does not expect the implementation of FIN 48 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.” This consensus concludes that for a split-dollar life insurance arrangement within the scope of this Issue, an employer should recognize a liability for future benefits in accordance with FASB Statement No. 106 (if, in substance, a postretirement benefit plan exits) or APB Opinion No. 12 (if the arrangement is, in substance, an individual deferred compensation contract) based on the substantive agreement with the employee. The consensus is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Corporation is currently evaluating the effect that EITF No. 06-4 will have on its consolidated financial statements when implemented.

In September 2006, The Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 06-5, “Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance- Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4 .” This consensus concludes that a

29

policyholder should consider any additional amounts included in the contractual terms of the insurance policy other than the cash surrender value in determining the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract. A consensus also was reached that a policyholder should determine the amount that could be realized under the life insurance contract assuming the surrender of an individual-life by individual-life policy (or certificate by certificate in a group policy). The consensuses are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Corporation is currently evaluating the effect that EITF No. 06-5 will have on its consolidated financial statements when implemented.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates, exchange rates and equity prices. The Corporation’s market risk is composed primarily of interest rate risk. The Corporation’s Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is responsible for reviewing the interest rate sensitivity position and establishing policies to monitor and limit exposure to this risk. The Board of Directors reviews and approves the guidelines established by ALCO.

Interest rate risk is monitored through the use of two complimentary modeling tools: earnings simulation modeling and economic value simulation (net present value estimation). Each of these models measures changes in a variety of interest rate scenarios. While each of the interest rate risk measures has limitations, taken together they represent a reasonably comprehensive view of the magnitude of interest rate risk in the Corporation, the distribution of risk along the yield curve, the level of risk through time, and the amount of exposure to changes in certain interest rate relationships. Earnings simulation and economic value models, which more effectively measure the cash flow and optionality impacts, are utilized by management on a regular basis and are explained below.

Earnings Simulation Analysis

Management uses simulation analysis to measure the sensitivity of net interest income to changes in interest rates. The model calculates an earnings estimate based on current and projected balances and rates. This method is subject to the accuracy of the assumptions that management has input, but it provides a better analysis of the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates than other potential analyses.

Assumptions used in the model are derived from historical trends and management’s outlook and include loan and deposit growth rates and projected yields and rates. Such assumptions are monitored and periodically adjusted as appropriate. All maturities, calls and prepayments in the securities portfolio are assumed to be reinvested in like instruments. Mortgage loans and mortgage backed securities prepayment assumptions are based on industry estimates of prepayment speeds for portfolios with similar coupon ranges and seasoning. Different interest rate scenarios and yield curves are used to measure the sensitivity of earnings to changing interest rates. Interest rates on different asset and liability accounts move differently when the prime rate changes and are reflected in the different rate scenarios.

30

The Corporation uses its simulation model to estimate earnings in rate environments where rates ramp up or down around a “most likely” rate scenario, based on implied forward rates. The analysis assesses the impact on net interest income over a 12 month time horizon by applying 12-month shock versus the implied forward rates of 200 basis points up and down. The following table represents the interest rate sensitivity on net interest income for the Corporation across the rate paths modeled as of December 31, 2006:

	Change in Net Interest Income
Change in Yield Curve	(Percent)		($ in thousands)
+200 basis points	0.17	%	$	19
Most likely rate scenario	0.00	%		—
-200 basis points	-1.17	%		-129

Economic Value Simulation

Economic value simulation is used to determine the estimated fair value of assets and liabilities over different interest rate scenarios. Economic values are calculated based on discounted cash flow analysis. The net economic value of equity is the economic value of all assets minus the economic value of all liabilities. The change in net economic value over different rate scenarios is an indication of the longer term earnings sensitivity capability of the balance sheet. The same assumptions are used in the economic value simulation as in the earnings simulation. The economic value simulation uses simultaneous rate shocks to the balance sheet, whereas the earnings simulation uses rate shock over 12 months. The following chart reflects the estimated change in net economic value over different rate environments using economic value simulation as of December 31, 2006:

	Change in Economic Value of Equity
Change in Yield Curve	(Percent)		($ in thousands)
+200 basis points	-13.09	%	$	-4,794
Most likely rate scenario	0.00	%		—
-200 basis points	9.67	%		3,541

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The following financial statements are filed as a part of this report following ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

1. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

2. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005

31

3. Consolidated Statements of Income for the three years ended December 31, 2006

4. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2006

5. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2006

6. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period to which this report relates, the Corporation has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Corporation’s (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Corporation’s periodic SEC filings. There have been no significant changes in the Corporation’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Corporation carried out its evaluation.

ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10: DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

All required information is detailed in the Company’s 2007 definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders (“Definitive Proxy Statement”), which is expected to be filed with the SEC within the required time period, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information on executive compensation is provided in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information on security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters is provided in the Definitive Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.

32

The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2006, relating to the Corporation’s stock incentive plans, pursuant to which grants of options to acquire shares of common stock may be granted from time to time.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Year Ended December 31, 2006

	Number of shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options	Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options	Number of shares Remaining Available of Future Issuance Under Plans
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders	29,718	23.92	53,707
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders	—	—	—
Total	29,718	23.92	53,707

ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information on certain relationships and related transactions are detailed in the Definitive Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information on principal accounting fees and services is provided in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

33

PART IV.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Exhibit Listing

Exhibit Number	Description
2	Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Reorganization Agreement”) dated as of March 20, 2000 between the Corporation and Bank. Exhibit A of the Proxy Statement included in Form S-4 Registration Statement filed March 24, 2000, incorporated by reference).
3(a)	Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation (Appendix 1 to Exhibit A of the Proxy Statement included in Form S-4 Registration Statement filed March 24, 2000, incorporated by reference).
3(b)	Bylaws (Appendix 2 to Exhibit A of the Proxy Statement included in Form S-4 Registration Statement filed March 24, 2000, incorporated by reference).
10(a)	The Corporation’s Stock Incentive Plan (Appendix 3 to Exhibit A of the Proxy Statement included in Form S-4 Registration Statement filed March 24, 2000, incorporated by reference).
10(b)	First Amendment to the Corporation’s Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 99(b) to Form S-8 Registration Statement filed November 8, 2000, incorporated by reference).
10(c)	The Corporation’s Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors (Appendix 4 to Exhibit A of the Proxy Statement included in Form S-4 Registration Statement filed March 24, 2000, incorporated by Reference).
10(d)	First Amendment to the Corporation’s Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors (Exhibit 99(d) to Form S-8 Registration Statement filed November 8, 2000, incorporated by reference).
13	The Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders.
21	Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23	Consent of Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act

34

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1	BOE Financial Services Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3D filed November 8, 2000.)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the town of Tappahannock, State of Virginia, on March 27, 2007.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.
By:	/s/ Bruce E. Thomas
	Bruce E. Thomas Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 27, 2007

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

SIGNATURE	TITLE
/s/ George M. Longest, Jr.	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
George M. Longest, Jr.

/s/ Bruce E. Thomas	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Bruce E. Thomas

/s/ Alexander F. Dillard, Jr.	Chairman of the Board
Alexander F. Dillard, Jr.

35

/s/ R. Harding Ball	Director
R. Harding Ball
/s/ R. Tyler Bland, III	Director
R. Tyler Bland, III
/s/ L. McCauley Chenault	Director
L. McCauley Chenault
/s/ Frances H. Ellis	Director
Frances H. Ellis
/s/ George B. Elliott	Director
George B. Elliott
/s/ Page Emerson Hughes	Director
Page Emerson Hughes
/s/ Philip T. Minor	Director
Philip T. Minor

36

EX-13

Exhibit 13

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Tappahannock, Virginia

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORT

DECEMBER 31, 2006

CONTENTS

	Page
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	1
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated balance sheets	2
Consolidated statements of income	3 and 4
Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity	5 and 6
Consolidated statements of cash flows	7 and 8
Notes to consolidated financial statements	9-36

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.

Tappahannock, Virginia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Corporation is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As noted in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation changed its method of accounting for its defined benefit pension plan to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).”

Winchester, Virginia

March 22, 2007

BOE FINANCIA L SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2006 and 2005

	2006			2005
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	5,520,191		$	7,365,111
Securities available for sale, at fair value		55,963,463			52,392,786
Securities held to maturity (fair value approximates $2,949,000 in 2006 and $2,932,500 in 2005)		3,000,000			3,000,000
Equity securities, restricted, at cost		1,552,500			1,188,200
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $2,399,638 in 2006 and $2,248,658 in 2005		194,490,988			180,207,461
Bank premises and equipment, net		10,453,561			7,656,421
Accrued interest receivable		1,362,989			1,190,466
Intangible assets, net		524,263			650,086
Other assets		8,510,146			8,280,231
Total assets	$	281,378,101		$	261,930,762
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	27,809,248		$	30,790,902
Interest-bearing		203,055,733			192,340,804
Total deposits	$	230,864,981		$	223,131,706
Federal funds purchased		3,207,000			1,810,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		12,000,000			5,000,000
Trust preferred capital notes		4,124,000			4,124,000
Accrued interest payable		851,114			526,095
Other liabilities		2,284,448			1,104,324
Total liabilities	$	253,331,543		$	235,696,125
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $5 par value, authorized 100,000 shares; no shares issued and oustanding	$	—		$	—
Common stock, $5 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and oustanding 1,208,109 and 1,198,059 shares		6,040,545			5,990,295
Additional paid-in capital		5,476,874			5,264,250
Retained earnings		17,256,210			15,059,873
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net		(727,071	)		(79,781	)
Total stockholders’ equity	$	28,046,558		$	26,234,637
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	281,378,101		$	261,930,762

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

BOE FINANCIAL SE RVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income

Three Years Ended December 31, 2006

	2006			2005			2004
Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	14,241,540		$	11,943,617		$	10,663,837
Interest and dividends on securities:
U.S. Treasury		40,054			59,996			45,349
U.S. Government agencies		677,648			677,013			436,010
State and political subdivisions, nontaxable		1,379,808			1,346,092			1,228,077
State and political subdivisions, taxable		134,416			126,483			127,425
Other securities		183,447			150,215			321,596
Interest on federal funds sold		76,875			39,103			52,737
Total interest and dividend income	$	16,733,788		$	14,342,519		$	12,875,031
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits	$	6,055,277		$	3,985,067		$	3,399,013
Interest on borrowings		916,525			483,444			207,224
Total interest expense	$	6,971,802		$	4,468,511		$	3,606,237
Net interest income	$	9,761,986		$	9,874,008		$	9,268,794
Provision for Loan Losses		125,000			240,400			305,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	$	9,636,986		$	9,633,608		$	8,963,794
Noninterest Income
Service charge income	$	1,042,529		$	986,268		$	993,880
Net security gains (losses)		(13,060	)		2,625			65,606
Net gains on sales of loans		60,717			55,774			56,981
Net gains (losses) on sale of premises and equipment		467,415			(23,017	)		48,783
Other income		692,864			579,153			461,920
Total noninterest income	$	2,250,465		$	1,600,803		$	1,627,170

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Continued)

Three Years Ended December 31, 2006

	2006		2005		2004
Noninterest Expenses
Salaries	$	3,246,677	$	3,053,914	$	2,857,580
Employee benefits and costs		1,134,457		982,274		804,201
Occupancy expenses		422,793		330,219		342,340
Furniture and equipment related expenses		449,283		415,150		437,259
Data processing		554,996		530,033		471,357
Stationery and printing		172,436		138,403		180,004
Postage		175,112		153,265		170,695
Bank franchise tax		238,179		221,950		214,457
Other operating expenses		1,498,637		1,436,547		1,404,262
Total noninterest expenses	$	7,892,570	$	7,261,755	$	6,882,155
Net income before income taxes	$	3,994,881	$	3,972,656	$	3,708,809
Income Taxes		872,023		871,890		823,314
Net income	$	3,122,858	$	3,100,766	$	2,885,495
Earnings Per Share, basic	$	2.60	$	2.60	$	2.43
Earnings Per Share, diluted	$	2.58	$	2.58	$	2.42

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Three Years Ended December 31, 2006

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Compre- hensive Income (Loss)			Compre- hensive Income			Total
Balance, December 31, 2003	$	5,915,735	$	5,008,853	$	10,693,464		$	1,303,696					$	22,921,748
Comprehensive income:
Net income - 2004		—		—		2,885,495			—		$	2,885,495			2,885,495
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of deferred taxes of $240,479		—		—		—			—			(466,812	)		—
Less reclassification adjustment, net of taxes of $22,306		—		—		—			—			(43,300	)		—
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		—		—		—			(510,112	)	$	(510,112	)		(510,112	)
Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—		$	2,375,383			—
Cash dividends, $0.63 per share		—		—		(747,240	)		—						(747,240	)
Fractional shares purchased under dividend reinvestment plan		—		—		(78	)		—						(78	)
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan		15,120		69,375		—			—						84,495
Exercise of stock options		13,900		32,548		—			—						46,448
Balance, December 31, 2004	$	5,944,755	$	5,110,776	$	12,831,641		$	793,584					$	24,680,756
Comprehensive income:
Net income - 2005		—		—		3,100,766			—		$	3,100,766			3,100,766
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of deferred taxes of $449,023		—		—		—			—			(871,632	)		—
Less reclassification adjustment, net of taxes of $892		—		—		—			—			(1,733	)		—
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		—		—		—			(873,365	)	$	(873,365	)		(873,365	)
Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—		$	2,227,401			—
Cash dividends, $0.73 per share		—		—		(872,371	)		—						(872,371	)
Fractional shares purchased under dividend reinvestment plan		—		—		(163	)		—						(163	)
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan		14,980		80,074		—			—						95,054
Exercise of stock options		30,560		73,400		—			—						103,960
Balance, December 31, 2005 (forwarded)	$	5,990,295	$	5,264,250	$	15,059,873		$	(79,781	)				$	26,234,637

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Continued)

Three Years Ended December 31, 2006

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Compre- hensive Income (Loss)			Compre- hensive Income		Total
Balance, December 31, 2005 (brought forward)	$	5,990,295	$	5,264,250	$	15,059,873		$	(79,781	)			$	26,234,637
Comprehensive income:
Net income - 2006		—		—		3,122,858			—		$	3,122,858		3,122,858
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of deferred taxes of $18,848		—		—		—			—			36,588		—
Add reclassification adjustment, net of taxes of $4,440		—		—		—			—			8,620		—
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:		—		—		—			45,208		$	45,208		45,208
Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—		$	3,168,066		—
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of deferred taxes of $356,742		—		—		—			(692,498	)				(692,498	)
Cash dividends, $0.77 per share		—		—		(926,469	)		—					(926,469	)
Fractional shares purchased under dividend reinvestment plan		—		—		(52	)		—					(52	)
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan		15,600		84,032		—			—					99,632
Exercise of stock options		34,650		128,592		—			—					163,242
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	6,040,545	$	5,476,874	$	17,256,210		$	(727,071	)			$	28,046,558

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Three Years Ended December 31, 2006

	2006			2005			2004
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	3,122,858		$	3,100,766		$	2,885,495
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		605,594			507,708			507,201
Origination of loans available for sale		(6,932,350	)		(5,626,948	)		(7,059,823	)
Proceeds from sale of loans available for sale		6,993,067			6,043,365			6,756,161
Provision for loan losses		125,000			240,400			305,000
(Gains) losses on sale of securities		13,060			(2,625	)		(65,606	)
(Gains) losses on disposal of premises and equipment		(467,415	)		23,017			(48,783	)
(Gains) on sale of loans		(60,717	)		(55,774	)		(56,981	)
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(287,988	)		(126,218	)		124,848
Amortization of premiums on securities		202,316			218,296			238,840
Accretion of discounts on securities		(17,936	)		(20,990	)		(24,244	)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets		219,004			168,975			(213,122	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		457,582			582,584			(26,976	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	3,972,075		$	5,052,556		$	3,322,010
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from sales, principal repayments, calls and maturities of securities available for sale	$	10,009,939		$	9,556,053		$	11,658,025
(Purchase) redemption of restricted equity securities		(364,300	)		(355,400	)		114,100
Purchase of securities available for sale		(13,711,239	)		(8,511,555	)		(15,335,053	)
Purchase of securities held to maturity		—			—			(3,000,000	)
Net (increase) decrease in loans to customers		(14,408,527	)		(22,976,389	)		604,930
(Increase) decrease in federal funds sold		—			5,064,000			(4,779,000	)
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance		—			(5,500,000	)		—
Purchases of premises and equipment		(3,524,885	)		(1,613,366	)		(675,219	)
Proceeds from disposal of premises and equipment		715,389			—			420,594
Net cash (used in) investing activities	$	(21,283,623	)	$	(24,336,657	)	$	(10,991,623	)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Continued)

Three Years Ended December 31, 2006

	2006			2005			2004
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits	$	7,733,275		$	16,158,987		$	3,691,151
Increase in federal funds purchased		1,397,000			1,810,000			—
Increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances		7,000,000			5,000,000			—
Dividends paid		(926,469	)		(872,371	)		(747,240	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		262,874			199,014			130,943
Cash paid for fractional shares		(52	)		(163	)		(78	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	15,466,628		$	22,295,467		$	3,074,776
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(1,844,920	)	$	3,011,366		$	(4,594,837	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Beginning of year		7,365,111			4,353,745			8,948,582
End of year	$	5,520,191		$	7,365,111		$	4,353,745
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during year:
Interest	$	6,646,783		$	4,261,817		$	3,616,769
Income taxes	$	1,137,804		$	481,000		$	880,000
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale	$	68,496		$	(1,323,280	)	$	(772,897	)
Pension liability adjustment	$	(1,049,240	)	$	—		$	—

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

8

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Nature of Banking Activities and Significant Accounting Policies

BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. (the Corporation) is a bank holding company, which owns all of the stock of its sole subsidiaries, Bank of Essex (the Bank) and BOE Statutory Trust I (the Trust). The Bank provides commercial, residential and consumer loans, and a variety of deposit products to its customers in the Northern Neck and Richmond regions of Virginia.

Essex Services, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank and was formed to sell title insurance to the Bank’s mortgage loan customers. Essex Services, Inc. also offers insurance and investment products through affiliations with two limited liability companies.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bank of Essex. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. FASB Interpretation No. 46 (R) requires that the Corporation no longer eliminate through consolidation the equity investment in BOE Statutory Trust I, which approximated $124,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The subordinated debt of the Trust is reflected as a liability of the Corporation.

Securities

Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as “held to maturity” and recorded at amortized cost. Securities not classified as held to maturity, including equity securities with readily determinable fair values, are classified as “available for sale” and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income.

Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other than temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.

Restricted Securities

The Corporation is required to maintain an investment in the capital stock of certain correspondent banks. The Corporation’s investment in these securities is recorded at cost.

9

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Loans

The Bank grants mortgage, commercial and consumer loans to customers. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by mortgage loans. The ability of the Bank’s debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditions in the Bank’s market area.

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method.

The accrual of interest on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all of the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses relating to specifically identified loans, as well as probable credit losses inherent in the balance of the loan portfolio, based on an evaluation of the collectibility of existing loans and prior loss experience. This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. This evaluation does not include the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that are related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses, and may require the Bank to make additions to the allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

10

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. For loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures.

Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated market in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income. Mortgage loans held for sale are generally sold with the mortgage servicing rights released by the Corporation.

The Corporation enters into commitments to originate certain mortgage loans whereby the interest rate on the loans is determined prior to funding (rate lock commitments). Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered to be derivatives. The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment and closing and the sale of the loan generally ranges from thirty to ninety days. The Corporation protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts forward delivery commitments, whereby the Corporation commits to sell a loan at the time the borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer has assumed interest rate risk on the loan. As a result, the Corporation is not exposed to losses nor will it realize significant gains related to its rate lock commitments due to changes in interest rates. The correlation between the rate lock commitments and the best efforts contracts is very high due to their similarity. Because of this high correlation, the gain or loss that occurs on the rate lock commitments is immaterial.

11

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Bank Premises and Equipment

Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Land is carried at cost. Depreciation of bank premises and equipment is computed on the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 10 to 50 years for premises and 5 to 20 years for equipment, furniture and fixtures.

Costs of maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred and major improvements are capitalized. Upon sale or retirement of depreciable properties, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in the determination of income.

Intangibles

Intangible assets consist of core deposit premiums from a branch acquisition. Intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years.

Other Real Estate

Real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure is held for sale and is initially recorded at the lower of the loan balance or the fair value at the date of foreclosure net of estimated disposal costs, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell. Revenues and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other operating expenses. Costs to bring a property to salable condition are capitalized up to the fair value of the property while costs to maintain a property in salable condition are expensed as incurred. The Corporation had no other real estate at December 31, 2006 or 2005.

Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding and excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted earnings per share is computed in a manner similar to basic EPS, except for certain adjustments to the numerator and the denominator. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Corporation relate solely to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock method.

12

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Stock-Based Compensation

At December 31, 2006, the Corporation had two stock-based compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 9. Effective January 1, 2006, the Corporation adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123R requires the costs resulting from all share-based payments to employees be recognized in the financial statements. Stock-based compensation is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model for determining fair value. Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123R, the Corporation accounted for the plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost was reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Corporation had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. No stock-based compensation expense was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2006 as no stock options were granted or vested. Effective December 22, 2005, the Corporation accelerated the vesting of all novested stock options under the stock-based compensation plans.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2005			2004
Net income, as reported	$	3,100,766		$	2,885,495
Deduct total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax effect		(202,201	)		(64,943	)
Pro forma net income	$	2,898,565		$	2,820,552
Earnings per share:
Basic - as reported	$	2.60		$	2.43
Basic - pro forma	$	2.43		$	2.38
Diluted - as reported	$	2.58		$	2.42
Diluted - pro forma	$	2.41		$	2.36

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Corporation has defined cash equivalents as those amounts included in the balance sheet caption “Cash and due from banks.”

Advertising Costs

The Corporation follows the policy of charging the costs of production of advertising to expense as incurred. Total advertising expense incurred for 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $112,945, $78,330 and $93,578, respectively.

13

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to the current year provisions.

Note 2. Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
	2006
U.S. Treasury securities	$	999,115	$	—	$	(19,340	)	$	979,775
U.S. Agency and mortgage-backed securities		15,373,799		11,055		(259,158	)		15,125,697
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		38,299,358		246,741		(320,870	)		38,225,229
Corporate debt securities		1,280,598		12,902		(5,057	)		1,288,443
Other equity securities		64,656		279,664		—			344,320
	$	56,017,526	$	550,362	$	(604,425	)	$	55,963,463
	2005
U.S. Treasury securities	$	1,748,174	$	—	$	(37,999	)	$	1,710,175
U.S. Agency and mortgage-backed securities		12,885,090		5,490		(367,764	)		12,522,816
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		36,833,547		363,291		(347,462	)		36,849,376
Corporate debt securities		982,199		28,634		—			1,010,833
Other equity securities		64,656		234,930		—			299,586
	$	52,513,666	$	632,345	$	(753,225	)	$	52,392,786

14

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale as of December 31, 2006, by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without any penalties.

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	9,092,411	$	9,070,047
Due after one year through five years		29,564,027		29,344,022
Due after five years through ten years		16,024,813		15,928,787
Due after ten years		1,271,619		1,276,287
Other equity securities		64,656		344,320
	$	56,017,526	$	55,963,463

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Corporation owned one U.S. Government Agency bond in the held to maturity classification with a book value of $3,000,000. The market value of the bond was $2,949,000 and $2,932,500 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The bond matures in 2024.

Proceeds from sales, principal repayments, calls and maturities of securities available for sale during 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $10,009,939, $9,566,053 and $11,658,025, respectively. Gross realized gains of $18,804, $11,960 and $101,138 and gross realized losses of $31,864, $9,335 and $35,532 were recognized on those sales for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The tax provision (benefit) applicable to these net realized gains amounted to $(4,440), $892 and $22,306, respectively.

Securities with amortized costs of $7,682,899 and $8,422,978 at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

15

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

A summary of investments in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2006 and 2005 follows:

	Duration of the Unrealized Loss
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More
	Fair Value		Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value		Unrealized (Losses)
2006
U.S. Treasury securities	$	497,150	$	(3,337	)	$	482,625	$	(16,003	)
U.S. Agency and mortgage- backed securities		2,160,944		(9,264	)		9,089,792		(249,894	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		6,532,392		(26,997	)		14,835,564		(293,873	)
Corporate securities		496,950		(5,057	)		—		—
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	9,687,436	$	(44,655	)	$	24,407,981	$	(559,770	)
2005
U.S. Treasury securities	$	—	$	—		$	1,710,175	$	(37,999	)
U.S. Agency and mortgage- backed securities		6,452,591		(159,992	)		5,876,641		(207,772	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		9,992,617		(160,577	)		5,940,175		(186,885	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	16,445,208	$	(320,569	)	$	13,526,991	$	(432,656	)

16

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The unrealized losses in the investment portfolio as of December 31, 2006, are generally a result of market fluctuations that occur daily. The unrealized losses are from 120 securities that are all of investment grade, backed by insurance, U.S. government agency guarantees, or the full faith and credit of local municipalities throughout the United States. The Corporation has the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity. Market prices are affected by conditions beyond the control of the Corporation. Investment decisions are made by the management group of the Corporation and reflect the overall liquidity and strategic asset/liability objectives of the Corporation. Management analyzes the securities portfolio frequently and manages the portfolio to provide an overall positive impact to the Corporation’s income statement and balance sheet.

Note 3. Loans

Major classifications of loans are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	56,264	$	48,898
Commercial		73,594		62,580
Construction		29,984		32,084
Equity lines of credit		8,150		9,818
Commercial loans		22,934		22,873
Consumer installment loans:
Personal		5,036		5,276
Credit cards		929		927
	$	196,891	$	182,456
Less: Allowance for loan losses		2,400		2,249
Loans, net	$	194,491	$	180,207

A summary of the transactions affecting the allowance for loan losses is as follows:

	2006			2005			2004
Balance, beginning of year	$	2,248,658		$	2,088,329		$	2,128,254
Provision for loan losses		125,000			240,400			305,000
Loans charged off		(137,873	)		(158,810	)		(429,781	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		163,853			78,739			84,856
Balance, end of year	$	2,399,638		$	2,248,658		$	2,088,329

17

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:

	December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance	$	1,635,400	$	1,517,800	$	2,823,700
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance		120,700		223,200		—
Total impaired loans	$	1,756,100	$	1,741,000	$	2,823,700
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans	$	567,700	$	536,300	$	606,345
	2006		2005		2004
Nonaccrual loans	$	—	$	150,418	$	240,935
Loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing		101,560		259,500		100,236
Average balance of impaired loans		1,748,550		2,394,350		2,610,500
Interest income recognized on impaired loans		175,261		195,899		168,359
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans		158,889		195,899		168,359

The Corporation has not committed to lend additional funds to these debtors.

Note 4. Premises and Equipment

A summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation of bank premises and equipment at December 31, 2006 and 2005 follows:

	2006		2005
Land	$	2,629,218	$	2,729,218
Buildings		7,849,978		3,940,808
Furniture and fixtures		4,847,910		4,278,944
Construction in progress		11,203		1,317,470
	$	15,338,309	$	12,266,440
Accumulated depreciation		4,884,748		4,610,019
	$	10,453,561	$	7,656,421

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, amounted to $479,771, $381,885 and $381,377, respectively.

18

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5. Deposits

The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $43,980,269 and $39,864,361, respectively.

The scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2006 are as follows:

2007	$	113,762,513
2008		20,731,324
2009		3,289,543
2010		2,547,793
2011		1,638,744
	$	141,969,917

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, overdraft demand deposits reclassified to loans totaled $101,649 and $71,186, respectively.

Note 6. Income Taxes

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities follows:

	2006		2005
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	636,072	$	594,442
Deferred compensation		224,155		163,578
Nonaccrual loan interest		—		5,168
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale		18,382		41,099
Accrued pension		365,304		—
	$	1,243,913	$	804,287
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation	$	249,319	$	300,430
Discount accretion on securities		15,366		19,173
Partnership losses		59,352		57,599
Prepaid pension		—		129,222
Other		21,983		21,983
	$	346,020	$	528,407
Net deferred tax assets	$	897,893	$	275,880

19

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Allocation of the income tax expense between current and deferred portions is as follows:

	2006			2005			2004
Current tax provision	$	1,160,011		$	998,108		$	698,466
Deferred tax (benefit) expense		(287,988	)		(126,218	)		124,848
	$	872,023		$	871,890		$	823,314
The following is a reconciliation of the expected income tax expense with the reported expense for each year:
	2006			2005			2004
Statutory Federal income tax rate		34.0	%		34.0	%		34.0	%
(Reduction) in taxes resulting from:
Municipal interest		(10.3	)		(10.6	)		(10.5	)
Other, net		(1.9	)		(1.5	)		(1.3	)
Effective income tax rate		21.8	%		21.9	%		22.2	%

Note 7. Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Lines of Credit

The Corporation had advances on lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta that totaled $12,000,000 and $5,000,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on these advances was 4.75%. One advance totaling $7,000,000 matures in 2007 with the remaining $5,000,000 advance maturing in 2015. Advances on the lines are secured by all of the Corporation’s first lien loans on one-to-four unit single-family dwellings. As of December 31, 2006, the book value of these loans totaled approximately $42,804,000. The amount of available credit is limited to seventy-five percent of qualifying collateral. Any borrowings in excess of the qualifying collateral require pledging of additional assets.

The Corporation has unsecured lines of credit with correspondent banks available for overnight borrowing totaling approximately $16,500,000. At December 31, 2006, $3,207,000 had been drawn on these lines of credit.

Note 8. Employee Benefit Plans

The Corporation has a noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan for all full-time employees over 21 years of age. Benefits are generally based upon years of service and the employees’ compensation. The Corporation funds pension costs in accordance with the funding provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

20

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plan’s benefit obligations and fair value of assets over the years ending December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, computed as of October 1, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively:

	2006			2005			2004
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation, beginning	$	4,289,019		$	3,561,978		$	3,066,325
Service cost		363,570			308,269			245,785
Interest cost		245,828			212,894			198,503
Actuarial loss		(332,800	)		233,774			460,162
Benefits paid		(27,896	)		(27,896	)		(408,797	)
Benefit obligation, ending	$	4,537,721		$	4,289,019		$	3,561,978
Change in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets, beginning	$	3,071,341		$	2,545,270		$	1,921,202
Actual return on plan assets		251,931			342,457			241,058
Employer contributions		167,914			211,510			791,807
Benefits paid		(27,896	)		(27,896	)		(408,797	)
Fair value of plan assets, ending	$	3,463,290		$	3,071,341		$	2,545,270
Funded Status	$	(1,074,431	)	$	(1,217,678	)	$	(1,016,708	)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss		—			1,428,442			1,378,746
Unrecognized net obligation at transition		—			(19,208	)		(22,408	)
Unrecognized prior service cost		—			20,595			24,026
(Accrued) prepaid benefit cost at October 1	$	(1,074,431	)	$	212,151		$	363,656
Contributions made in December		—			167,914			211,510
(Accrued) prepaid benefit cost at December 31	$	(1,074,431	)	$	380,065		$	575,166
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet
Other assets	$	—		$	380,065		$	575,166
Other liabilities		1,074,431			—			—
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net loss	$	1,048,084		$	—		$	—
Prior service cost		17,164			—			—
Net obligation at transition		(16,008	)		—			—
Total amount recognized	$	1,049,240		$	—		$	—

The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $2,741,049, $2,416,644 and $1,945,342 at September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

21

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the plan for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:

	2006			2005			2004
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service cost	$	363,570		$	308,269		$	245,785
Interest cost		245,828			212,894			198,503
Expected return on plan assets		(259,903	)		(215,187	)		(212,210	)
Amortization of prior service cost		3,431			3,431			3,431
Amortization of net obligation at transition		(3,200	)		(3,200	)		(3,200	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		55,530			56,808			37,694
Net periodic benefit cost	$	405,256		$	363,015		$	270,003
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net loss	$	1,048,084		$	—		$	—
Prior service cost		17,164			—			—
Net obligation at transition		(16,008	)		—			—
Deferred income tax benefit		(356,742	)		—			—
Total recognized in other comprehensive (loss)		692,498		$	—		$	—
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and accumulated other comprehensive (loss)	$	1,097,754		$	363,015		$	270,003
The weighted-average assumptions used in the measurement of the Corporation’s benefit obligation are shown in the following table:
	2006			2005			2004
Discount rate		6.00	%		5.75	%		6.00	%
Expected return on plan assets		8.50	%		8.50	%		8.50	%
Rate of compensation increase		5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%
The weighted-average assumption used in the measurement of the Corporation’s net periodic benefit cost are shown in the following table:
	2006			2005			2004
Discount rate		5.75	%		6.00	%		6.50	%
Expected return on plan assets		8.50	%		8.50	%		8.50	%
Rate of compensation increase		5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%

22

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Incremental Effect of Applying SFAS No. 158

on Individual Line Items in the Consolidated Balance Sheet

December 31, 2006

	Before Application of SFAS No. 158			Adjustments			After Application of SFAS No. 158
Other assets (deferred income taxes)	$	8,153,404		$	356,742		$	8,510,146
Other liabilities (pension liability)		1,235,208			1,049,240			2,284,448
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)		(34,573	)		(692,498	)		(727,071	)
Total stockholders’ equity		28,739,056			(692,498	)		28,046,558

Long-Term Rate of Return

The plan sponsor selects the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption in consultation with their investment advisors and actuary. This rate is intended to reflect the average rate of earnings expected to be earned on the funds invested or to be invested to provide plan benefits. Historical performance is reviewed, especially with respect to real rates of return (net of inflation), for the major asset classes held or anticipated to be held by the trust, and for the trust itself. Undue weight is not given to recent experience that may not continue over the measurement period, with higher significance placed on current forecasts of future long-term economic conditions.

Because assets are held in a qualified trust, anticipated returns are not reduced for taxes. Further, solely for this purpose, the plan is assumed to continue in force and not terminate during the period during which assets are invested. However, consideration is given to the potential impact of current and future investment policy, cash flow into and out of the trust, and expenses (both investment and non-investment) typically paid from plan assets (to the extent such expenses are not explicitly estimated within periodic cost).

Asset Allocation

The pension plan’s weighted-average asset allocations at September 30, 2006 and 2005, by asset category are as follows:

	2006		2005
Asset Category
Mutual funds - fixed income	30	%	34	%
Mutual funds - equity	56	%	66	%
Cash and equivalents	14	%	0	%
	100	%	100	%

23

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The trust fund is sufficiently diversified to maintain a reasonable level of risk without imprudently sacrificing return, with a targeted asset allocation of 40% fixed income and 60% equities. The investment manager selects investment fund managers with demonstrated experience and expertise, and funds with demonstrated historical performance, for the implementation of the plan’s investment strategy. The investment manager will consider both actively and passively managed investment strategies and will allocate funds across the asset classes to develop an efficient investment structure.

It is the responsibility of the trustee to administer the investments of the trust within reasonable costs, being careful to avoid sacrificing quality. These costs include, but are not limited to, management and custodial fees, consulting fees, transaction costs and other administrative costs chargeable to the trust.

The Corporation does not expect to contribute to its pension plan in 2007.

Estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are as follows:

2007	$	38,876
2008		61,624
2009		67,432
2010		87,686
2011		104,130
2012-2016		1,124,836

401(k) Plan

The Corporation has also adopted a contributory 401(k) profit sharing plan which covers substantially all employees. The employee may contribute up to 15% of compensation, subject to statutory limitations. The Corporation matches 50% of employee contributions up to 4% of compensation. The plan also provides for an additional discretionary contribution to be made by the Corporation as determined each year. The amounts charged to expense under this plan for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $53,642, $47,963 and $44,085, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Agreements

The Corporation has deferred compensation agreements with certain key employees and the Board of Directors. The retirement benefits to be provided are fixed based upon the amount of compensation earned and deferred. Deferred compensation expense amounted to $268,011, $56,593 and $3,612 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These contracts are funded by life insurance policies.

24

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9. Stock Option Plans

During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Corporation adopted stock option plans for all employees and outside directors. The plans provide that 110,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock will be reserved for both incentive and non-statutory stock options to purchase common stock of the Corporation. The exercise price per share for incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options shall not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant, and may be exercised at such times as may be specified by the Board of Directors in the participant’s stock option agreement. Each incentive and non-statutory stock option shall expire not more than ten years from the date the option is granted. The options vest at the rate of one quarter per year from the grant date. Effective December 22, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of all unvested stock options under the plans.

A summary of the status of the stock plans follows:

	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of year	37,589		$	23.87
Granted	—			—
Exercised	(6,930	)		23.56
Forfeited	(941	)		24.80
Outstanding at year end	29,718			23.92	6.5 years	$	206,250
Exercisable at year end	29,718			23.92	6.5 years	$	206,250

The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2006. This amount changes based on changes in the market value of the Corporation’s stock.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2006 was $61,250.

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2004 was $8.22 and was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions. There were no option grants during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Dividend yield	2.64%
Expected life	9.7 years
Expected volatility	25.86%
Risk-free interest rate	4.45%

25

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 10. Earnings Per Share

The following shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per share and the effect on the weighted average number of shares of diluted potential stock. Potential dilutive common stock had no effect on income available to common stockholders.

	2006			2005			2004
	Shares	Per Share		Share	Per Share		Shares	Per Share
Basic earnings per share	1,201,465	$	2.60	1,193,467	$	2.60	1,185,952	$	2.43
Effect of dilutive stock options	9,457			10,258			8,559
Diluted earnings per share	1,210,922	$	2.58	1,203,725	$	2.58	1,194,511	$	2.42

The Company granted options to employees and directors to purchase 3,797 shares on average during the year ended December 31, 2004 that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of those options exceeded the average market price of the common shares during the year. No options were excluded from the computation for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Note 11. Related Party Transactions

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has and expects to continue to have transactions, including borrowings, with its executive officers, directors, and their affiliates. All such loans are made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans to unrelated persons. Loans to such borrowers are summarized as follows:

	2006			2005
Balance, beginning of year	$	2,677,102		$	2,007,294
Principal additions		1,336,758			2,005,289
Repayments and reclassifications		(1,128,828	)		(1,335,481	)
Balance, end of year	$	2,885,032		$	2,677,102

26

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

In the normal course of business, there are outstanding various commitments and contingent liabilities, such as guarantees, commitments to extend credit, etc., which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Bank does not anticipate losses as a result of these transactions. See Note 15 with respect to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk.

As members of the Federal Reserve System, the Bank is required to maintain certain average reserve balances. For the final weekly reporting period in the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the aggregate amount of daily average required balances were approximately $632,000 and $995,000, respectively.

The Bank is required to maintain certain required reserve balances with a correspondent bank. Those required balances were $250,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Note 13. Dividend Limitations on Affiliate Bank

Transfers of funds from the banking subsidiary to the parent corporation in the form of loans, advances and cash dividends are restricted by federal and state regulatory authorities. As of December 31, 2006, the aggregate amount of unrestricted funds, which could be transferred from the banking subsidiary to the parent corporation, without prior regulatory approval, totaled $7,129,004 (25.4% of net assets).

Note 14. Concentration of Credit Risk

The Bank has a diversified loan portfolio consisting of commercial, real estate and consumer (installment) loans. Substantially all of the Bank’s customers are residents or operate business ventures in its market area consisting of Essex, King William, Hanover, Henrico and adjacent counties. Therefore, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts and the Bank’s ability to realize the value of any underlying collateral, if needed, is influenced by the economic conditions in this market area.

The Bank maintains a portion of its cash balances with several financial institutions located in its market area. Accounts at each institution are secured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100,000. Uninsured balances were approximately $996,000 and $1,978,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

27

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 15. Financial Instruments With Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

The Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Bank has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

A summary of the contract amounts of the Bank’s exposure to off-balance-sheet risk as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, is as follows:

	2006		2005
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$	45,251,000	$	40,381,000
Standby letters of credit		4,971,000		4,602,000

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.

Unfunded commitments under commercial lines-of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These lines-of-credit are generally uncollateralized and usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Bank is committed.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s evaluation of the counterparty. Since most of the letters of credit are expected to expire without being drawn upon, they do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

28

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 16. Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements

The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s and Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, that the Corporation and Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

As of December 31, 2006, the most recent notification from the Federal Reserve Bank categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

29

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Corporation’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, are also presented in the table.

	Actual				Minimum Capital Requirement				Minimum To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2006:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated	$	34,679	16.4	%	$	16,919	8.00	%		N/A	N/A
Bank of Essex	$	33,869	16.1	%	$	16,866	8.00	%	$	21,083	10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated	$	32,559	15.4	%	$	8,460	4.00	%		N/A	N/A
Bank of Essex	$	31,874	15.1	%	$	8,433	4.00	%	$	12,650	6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) Consolidated	$	32,559	11.7	%	$	11,162	4.00	%		N/A	N/A
Bank of Essex	$	31,874	11.4	%	$	11,162	4.00	%	$	13,953	5.00	%
As of December 31, 2005:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated	$	31,788	15.7	%	$	16,224	8.00	%		N/A	N/A
Bank of Essex	$	31,141	15.4	%	$	16,205	8.00	%	$	20,256	10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) Consolidated	$	29,944	14.8	%	$	8,112	4.00	%		N/A	N/A
Bank of Essex	$	29,297	14.5	%	$	8,102	4.00	%	$	12,154	6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) Consolidated	$	29,944	11.6	%	$	10,369	4.00	%		N/A	N/A
Bank of Essex	$	29,297	11.3	%	$	10,369	4.00	%	$	12,961	5.00	%

30

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 17. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Interest Rate Risk

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Corporation’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. SFAS No. 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Corporation.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Short-Term Investments

For those short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities

For securities held for investment purposes, fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.

Restricted Securities

The carrying value of restricted securities approximates their fair value based on the redemption provisions of the respective entity.

Loans Receivable

For certain homogeneous categories of loans, such as some residential mortgages, and other consumer loans, fair value is estimated using the quoted market prices for securities backed by similar loans, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. The fair value of other types of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

31

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Long-Term Borrowings

The fair values of the Corporation’s long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Corporation’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Accrued Interest

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.

The fair value of stand-by letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair values of loan commitments and stand-by letters of credit were deemed to be immaterial.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments are as follows:

	2006				2005
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and short-term investments	$	5,520	$	5,520	$	7,365	$	7,365
Securities		58,963		58,912		55,393		55,325
Restricted securities		1,553		1,553		1,188		1,188
Loans, net of allowance		194,491		196,078		180,207		182,006
Accrued interest receivable		1,363		1,363		1,190		1,190
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	230,865	$	231,034	$	223,132	$	222,479
Federal funds purchased		3,207		3,207		1,810		1,810
Federal Home Loan Bank
Bank advances		12,000		11,637		5,000		4,647
Trust preferred capital notes		4,124		4,152		4,124		4,161
Accrued interest payable		851		851		526		526

32

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Corporation assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Corporation. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Corporation’s overall interest rate risk.

Note 18. Trust Preferred Capital Notes

On December 12, 2003, BOE Statutory Trust I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation, was formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities. On December 12, 2003, $4.1 million of trust preferred securities were issued through a direct placement. The securities have a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the weighted-average interest rate was 8.47% and 6.29%. The securities have a mandatory redemption date of December 12, 2033 and are subject to varying call provisions beginning December 12, 2008. The principal asset of the Trust is $4.1 million of the Corporation’s junior subordinated debt securities with the like maturities and like interest rates to the capital securities.

The trust preferred notes may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy determination purposes up to 25% of Tier 1 capital after its inclusion. The portion of the trust preferred not considered as Tier 1 capital may be included in Tier 2 capital. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, all trust preferred notes were included in Tier 1 capital.

The obligations of the Corporation with respect to the issuance of the Capital Securities constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Corporation of the Trust’s obligations with respect to the Capital Securities.

Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the Corporation may elect from time to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debt securities, which would result in a deferral of distribution payments on the related Capital Securities.

33

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 19. Parent Corporation Only Financial Statements

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

(Parent Corporation Only)

Balance Sheets (Condensed)

December 31, 2006 and 2005

	2006		2005
Assets
Cash	$	124,813	$	137,129
Investment in subsidiaries		31,485,295		29,710,691
Securities available for sale, at fair value		344,320		299,586
Other assets		322,160		302,051
Total assets	$	32,276,588	$	30,449,457
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Trust preferred capital notes	$	4,124,000	$	4,124,000
Other liabilities		106,030		90,820
Stockholders’ equity		28,046,558		26,234,637
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	32,276,588	$	30,449,457

34

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

(Parent Corporation Only)

Statements of Income (Condensed)

Three Years Ended December 31, 2006

	2006		2005		2004
Income:
Dividends from subsidiary	$	900,000	$	870,000	$	755,743
Dividends on other securities		15,310		11,399		7,481
Total income	$	915,310	$	881,399	$	763,224
Expenses:
Interest expense	$	338,615	$	263,223	$	187,004
Other		23,000		23,000		31,015
Total expenses	$	361,615	$	286,223	$	218,019
Income before allocated tax benefit and undistributed income of subsidiary	$	553,695	$	595,176	$	545,205
Allocated income tax benefit		117,743		93,441		74,855
Income before equity in undistributed income of subsidiary	$	671,438	$	688,617	$	620,060
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary		2,451,420		2,412,149		2,265,435
Net income	$	3,122,858	$	3,100,766	$	2,885,495

35

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

(Parent Corporation Only)

Statements of Cash Flows (Condensed)

Three Years Ended December 31, 2006

	2006			2005			2004
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	3,122,858		$	3,100,766		$	2,885,495
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Increase) in other assets		(20,109	)		(41,559	)		(45,277	)
Deferred tax (benefit) provision		(15,208	)		3,340			6,683
Undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(2,451,420	)		(2,412,149	)		(2,265,435	)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities		15,210			20,718			(7,987	)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	651,331		$	671,116		$	573,479
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash dividends paid	$	(926,469	)	$	(872,371	)	$	(747,240	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		262,874			199,014			130,943
Cash paid for fractional shares		(52	)		(163	)		(78	)
Net cash (used in) financing activities	$	(663,647	)	$	(673,520	)	$	(616,375	)
(Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(12,316	)	$	(2,404	)	$	(42,896	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Beginning		137,129			139,533			182,429
Ending	$	124,813		$	137,129		$	139,533

36

EX-21

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.

Name of Subsidiary	State of Organization
BOE Statutory Trust I	Delaware
Bank of Essex	Virginia
- Essex Services, Incorporated	Virginia

EX-23

Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-49546 filed on Form S-3D and No. 333-49538 filed on Form S-8 of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. of our report, dated March 22, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 appearing in this Form 10-K of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Winchester, Virginia

March 27, 2007

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, George M. Longest, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Kof BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 27, 2007

By:	/s/ George M. Longest, Jr.
	George M. Longest, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruce E. Thomas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 27, 2007

By:	/s/ Bruce E. Thomas
	Bruce E. Thomas Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BOE Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2006, and for the periods then ended.

/s/ George M. Longest, Jr.

George M. Longest, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Bruce E. Thomas

Bruce E. Thomas

Chief Financial Officer

March 27, 2007