UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒ QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
or
☐ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission File Number 0-29185
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Nevada | 52-2088326 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
735 State Street, Suite 500
Santa Barbara, California 93101
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)
(805)-845-3561
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value.
Check whether the Registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐ |
| Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company ☒ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of April 30, 2013 was 158,114,170.
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
| PAGE | |
| PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 3 |
| Item 1. Financial Statements | 3 |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) | 3 |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) | 4 |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY) (UNAUDITED) | 5 |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) | 6 |
| NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) | 8 |
| Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 17 |
| Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk | 19 |
| Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 19 |
| PART II – OTHER INFORMATION | 21 |
| Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 21 |
| Item 1A. Risk Factors | 21 |
| Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 21 |
| Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 21 |
| Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures | 21 |
| Item 5. Other Information | 21 |
| Item 6. Exhibits | 22 |
| SIGNATURES | 23 |
| 2 |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2013 (unaudited) | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
|
ASSETS | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | 4,482,552 | $ | 1,601,791 | ||||
| Other current assets | 137,351 | 40,132 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 4,619,903 | 1,641,923 | ||||||
| Property and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $253,411 and $249,040 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 51,840 | 55,674 | ||||||
| Other assets | 10,330 | 10,330 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 4,682,073 | $ | 1,707,927 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIENCY) | ||||||||
| Current liabilities | ||||||||
| Accounts payable-related parties | $ | 70,589 | $ | 65,192 | ||||
| Accounts payable-license agreements | 425,225 | 315,850 | ||||||
| Accounts payable-other | 253,969 | 411,346 | ||||||
| Accrued expenses-related parties | 413,378 | 468,086 | ||||||
| Accrued expenses-other | 50,289 | 21,657 | ||||||
| Accrued professional fees | 123,296 | 102,178 | ||||||
| Fair value of derivative liabilities | – | 3,221,138 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 1,336,746 | 4,605,447 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity (deficiency) | ||||||||
| Common stock, $.001 par value: 200,000,000 shares authorized, 158,062,170 and 143,667,570, shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 158,062 | 143,668 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 83,986,319 | 79,340,666 | ||||||
| Deficit accumulated during the development stage | (80,799,054 | ) | (82,381,854 | ) | ||||
| Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency) | 3,345,327 | (2,897,520 | ) | |||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficiency) | $ | 4,682,073 | $ | 1,707,927 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
| 3 |
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
| Inception | ||||||||||||
| (February 18, | ||||||||||||
| Three months ended March 31, | 1998) to March 31, | |||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Net sales | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 69,000 | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | – | – | 24,120 | |||||||||
| Gross profit | – | – | 44,880 | |||||||||
| Operating expenses | 1,212,884 | 1,869,905 | 52,283,189 | |||||||||
| Research and development expenses | 329,055 | 235,466 | 8,998,736 | |||||||||
| Non-cash patent settlement cost | – | – | 1,610,066 | |||||||||
| Loss before other income (expense) | (1,541,939 | ) | (2,105,371 | ) | (62,847,111 | ) | ||||||
| Other income (expense) | ||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | (28,845 | ) | 13,591 | 187,850 | ||||||||
| Interest income | – | – | 16,342 | |||||||||
| Interest and financing expense | (260 | ) | (2,462,867 | ) | (20,304,609 | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | (220,614 | ) | (1,139,477 | ) | (2,115,507 | ) | ||||||
| Gain on extinguishment of derivative liabilities | 3,441,752 | – | 5,886,847 | |||||||||
| Costs of private placement | – | – | (1,640,715 | ) | ||||||||
| Costs to induce conversion of notes | – | – | (469,043 | ) | ||||||||
| Loss on disposition of equipment | – | – | (14,426 | ) | ||||||||
| Settlement of Debt Due Morale/ Matthews | – | – | (927,903 | ) | ||||||||
| Settlement of litigation and debt | (67,294 | ) | 223,774 | 1,437,503 | ||||||||
| Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | 1,582,800 | (5,470,350 | ) | (80,790,772 | ) | |||||||
| Provision for income taxes | – | – | 8,282 | |||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,582,800 | $ | (5,470,350 | ) | $ | (80,799,054 | ) | ||||
| Net income (loss) per common share, basic | $ | .01 | $ | (.05 | ) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) per common share, diluted | $ | .01 | $ | (.05 | ) | |||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic | 150,112,286 | 118,213,662 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted | 172,461,669 | 118,213,662 | ||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
| 4 |
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 (UNAUDITED)
| Price Per | Common Stock | Additional Paid-in |
Deficit Accumulated During the Development |
Total Stockholders’ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Share | Shares | Amount | Capital | Stage | Equity(Deficiency) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2012 | 143,667,570 | $ | 143,668 | $ | 79,340,666 | $ | (82,381,854 | ) | $ | (2,897,520 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Common stock issued upon exercise of warrants, net | $ | 0.29 | 14,344,600 | 14,344 | 4,014,933 | - | 4,029,277 | |||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued for services | $ | 0.98 | 50,000 | 50 | 48,950 | - | 49,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Fair value of options and warrants issued as compensation | - | - | - | 428,897 | - | 428,897 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value of warrants issued to settle payables | - | - | - | 129,622 | - | 129,622 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value of warrants issued to consultants | - | - | - | 23,251 | - | 23,251 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | - | - | - | - | 1,582,800 | 1,582,800 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2013 | 158,062,170 | $ | 158,062 | $ | 83,986,319 | $ | (80,799,054 | ) | $ | 3,345,327 | ||||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
| 5 |
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. AND
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
| Inception (February 18, 1998) | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended March 31, | to March, 31 | |||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,582,800 | $ | (5,470,350 | ) | $ | (80,799,054 | ) | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Write off of intangible assets | – | – | 505,000 | |||||||||
| Settlement of litigation and debt | 67,294 | (223,774 | ) | (1,510,735 | ) | |||||||
| Settlement of debt due Morale/Matthews | – | – | 927,903 | |||||||||
| Stock based compensation expense | 428,897 | 564,992 | 8,675,440 | |||||||||
| Issuance of common stock for services | 49,000 | 150,000 | 9,312,038 | |||||||||
| Issuance of options for legal settlement | – | – | 31,500 | |||||||||
| Issuance of warrants for legal settlement | – | – | 4,957 | |||||||||
| Issuance of warrants for financing fees | – | – | 153,501 | |||||||||
| Issuance of warrants for consulting fees | 23,251 | 238,276 | 1,202,886 | |||||||||
| Increase in convertible notes related to default | – | – | 299,274 | |||||||||
| Interest on related party loans | – | – | 22,305 | |||||||||
| Patent acquisition cost | – | – | 1,610,066 | |||||||||
| Amortization of issuance costs and original issue debt discounts including beneficial conversion feature-part of interest expense | – | 2,462,666 | 19,754,169 | |||||||||
| Fair value of common stock and warrants issued to induce conversion of notes | – | – | 469,043 | |||||||||
| Costs of private placement convertible notes | – | – | 1,640,715 | |||||||||
| Change in fair value of derivative liability | 220,614 | 1,139,477 | 2,115,507 | |||||||||
| Gain on extinguishment of derivative liability | (3,441,752 | ) | – | (5,886,847 | ) | |||||||
| Amortization of deferred compensation | – | – | 3,060,744 | |||||||||
| Loss on disposition of assets | – | – | 14,426 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization of leasehold improvements | 4,371 | 9,079 | 535,347 | |||||||||
| Bad debt | – | – | 1,300 | |||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
| Accounts receivable | – | – | (1,380 | ) | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other | (97,219 | ) | (9,331 | ) | (137,270 | ) | ||||||
| Other assets | – | – | (10,330 | ) | ||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (45,299 | ) | (50,671 | ) | 4,789,755 | |||||||
| Accounts payable – license agreements | 109,375 | (53,125 | ) | (225,912 | ) | |||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses – related parties | (49,311 | ) | (9,225 | ) | (422,029 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | (1,147,979 | ) | (1,251,986 | ) | (33,867,681 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||||||
| Purchase of equipment | (537 | ) | (6,921 | ) | (615,541 | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from sale of equipment | – | – | 17,478 | |||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (537 | ) | (6,921 | ) | (598,063 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||||||
| Net proceeds under equity line of credit | – | – | 1,262,386 | |||||||||
| (Decrease) increase in payables to related parties and stockholder | – | – | 536,979 | |||||||||
| Advances from founding executive officer | – | – | 517,208 | |||||||||
| Net proceeds from issuance of convertible notes and warrants | – | 1,321,240 | 18,400,888 | |||||||||
| Repayment of convertible notes | – | – | (296,397 | ) | ||||||||
| Net proceeds from sale of stock and exercise of warrants and options | 4,029,277 | 351,850 | 18,527,232 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 4,029,277 | 1,673,090 | 38,948,296 | |||||||||
| Net increase in cash | 2,880,761 | 414,183 | 4,482,552 | |||||||||
| Cash, beginning of period | 1,601,791 | 617,797 | – | |||||||||
| Cash, end of period | $ | 4,482,552 | $ | 1,031,980 | $ | 4,482,552 | ||||||
| 6 |
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(continued)
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Inception (February 18, 1998) to March 31, | |||||||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information | ||||||||||||
| Cash paid during the year for: | ||||||||||||
| Interest | $ | 260 | $ | 201 | $ | 179,280 | ||||||
| Income taxes | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 8,282 | ||||||
| Non-cash investing and financing activities | ||||||||||||
| Acquisition of intangible asset through advance from related party and issuance of common stock | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 505,000 | ||||||
| Deferred compensation for stock options issued for services | - | - | 3,202,931 | |||||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment financed by advance from related party | - | - | 3,550 | |||||||||
| Conversion of related party debt to equity | - | - | 515,000 | |||||||||
| Conversion of accounts payable and accrued expenses to common stock | - | - | 860,105 | |||||||||
| Cancellation of stock | - | - | 8,047 | |||||||||
| Conversion of accounts payable and accrued expenses to convertible debentures | - | 33,740 | 689,846 | |||||||||
| Conversion of related party debt to convertible debentures | - | - | 72,500 | |||||||||
| Conversion of convertible debentures to common stock | - | 2,425,711 | 19,540,985 | |||||||||
| Issuance of shares for settlement of loans and other payable to Morale/Matthews | - | - | 2,783,711 | |||||||||
| Write off of deferred compensation | - | - | 142,187 | |||||||||
| Fair value of derivative liability recorded as note discount | - | - | 2,130,625 | |||||||||
| Proceeds of exercise of options applied to accounts payable | - | - | 67,500 | |||||||||
| Fair value of warrants and beneficial conversion feature associated with issued convertible notes | - | 1,354,980 | 15,800,944 | |||||||||
| Fair value of warrants issued to settle payables | 129,622 | - | 129,622 | |||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
| 7 |
SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 AND 2012 (UNAUDITED)
| 1. | Organization and basis of presentation |
Description of business
Save The World Air, Inc. (“STWA”, “Company”) was incorporated on February 18, 1998, as a Nevada Corporation under the name Mandalay Capital Corporation. The company changed its name to Save the World Air, Inc. on February 11, 1999, following the acquisition of the marketing and manufacturing rights of the ZEFS technologies. Our executive offices are at 735 State Street, Suite 500, Santa Barbara, California 93101. The telephone number is (805) 845-3561. The Company’s common stock is quoted under the symbol “ZERO” on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. More information including the Company’s fact sheet, logos and media articles are available at our corporate website, www.stwa.com.
Save The World Air, Inc. develops and intends to commercialize energy efficiency technologies that assist in meeting increasing global energy demands, improving the economics of oil extraction and transport, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Company's intellectual property portfolio includes 47 domestic and international patents and patents pending, which have been developed in conjunction with and exclusively licensed from Temple University. STWA's primary technology is called Applied Oil Technology™ (AOT™), a commercial-grade crude oil pipeline transportation flow-assurance product. AOT™ has been proven in U.S. Department of Energy tests to increase the energy efficiency of oil pipeline pump stations. The AOT product has transitioned from the research and development stage to initial commercial production for the midstream pipeline marketplace. The Company is actively engaged in research and development related to the optimization and value engineering of its commercial midstream pipeline AOT product and the development of complementary AOT product lines.
Basis of presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Save the World Air, Inc. (the "Company") have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Regulation S-K for scaled disclosures for smaller reporting companies. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in United States of America for complete financial statements. However, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial position and the consolidated results of operations. Results shown for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for a full fiscal year. Certain prior year’s amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations.
The consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31, 2012 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2013. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with that report.
Going concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company is in the development stage and has not generated any significant revenues from operations to date, and does not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. The Company has experienced recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows since inception, and has financed its working capital requirements through the recurring sale of its convertible notes and equity securities. As reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company had a negative cash flow from operations of $1,147,979 for the period ended March 31, 2013 and accumulated deficit of $80,799,054 at March 31, 2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional funds and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
| 8 |
At March 31, 2013, the Company had cash on hand in the amount of $4,482,552. Management expects that the current funds on hand will be sufficient to continue operations through June 2014. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt and equity securities for cash to operate our business, including without limitation the expenses it will incur in connection with the license and research and development agreements with Temple University; costs associated with product development and commercialization of the AOT technology; costs to manufacture and ship the products; costs to design and implement an effective system of internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures; costs of maintaining our status as a public company by filing periodic reports with the SEC and costs required to protect our intellectual property. In addition, as discussed below, the Company has substantial contractual commitments, including without limitation salaries to our executive officers pursuant to employment agreements, certain severance payments to a former officer and consulting fees, during the remainder of 2013 and beyond.
No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stock holders, in case or equity financing.
| 2. | Summary of significant accounting policies |
Development stage enterprise
The Company is a development stage enterprise. All losses accumulated since the inception of the Company have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.
The Company’s focus is on product development and marketing of proprietary devices that are designed to improve the operational parameters of petrochemical pipeline transport systems and has not yet generated meaningful revenues. The Company is currently transitioning from the product development cycle to the commercial manufacturing and sales cycle. Expenses have been funded through the sale of shares of common stock for cash, issuance of convertible notes for cash and the proceeds from exercise of options and warrants. The Company has taken actions to secure the intellectual property rights to the proprietary technologies and is the worldwide exclusive licensee for the intellectual property the Company co-developed with its intellectual property partner, Temple University of Philadelphia, PA.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Certain significant estimates were made in connection with preparing the Company’s financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates
Basic and Diluted Income per share
Our computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) includes basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as the income (loss) available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution, using the treasury stock method, that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the income (loss) of the Company as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. In computing diluted income (loss) per share, the treasury stock method assumes that outstanding options and warrants are exercised and the proceeds are used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Options and warrants may have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options and warrants. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.
Income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the respective periods. Basic and diluted (loss) per common share is the same for periods in which the company reported an operating loss because all warrants and stock options outstanding are anti-dilutive.
| 9 |
A reconciliation of basic and diluted shares for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 follows:
| March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | |||||||
| Average common shares outstanding – basic | 150,112,286 | 118,213,662 | ||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities | ||||||||
| Warrants | 12,269,883 | – | ||||||
| Options | 10,079,500 | – | ||||||
| Average diluted shares | 172,461,669 | 118,213,662 | ||||||
There were no adjustments to net income (loss) required for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share.
At March 31, 2013 and 2012, we excluded the outstanding securities summarized below, which entitle the holders thereof to acquire shares of common stock, from our calculation of earnings per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
| March 31, 2013 | March 31, 2012 | |||||||
| Warrants | 14,782,301 | 52,963,339 | ||||||
| Options | 17,198,598 | 28,049,558 | ||||||
| Total | 31,980,899 | 81,012,897 | ||||||
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges generally are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.
The fair value of the Company's common stock option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the common stock options, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.
Accounting for Warrants and Derivatives
The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a probability weighted average series Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing models to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates.
The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Fair value of financial instruments
Effective January 1, 2008, fair value measurements are determined by the Company's adoption of authoritative guidance issued by the FASB, with the exception of the application of the statement to non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities as permitted. The adoption of the authoritative guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's fair value measurements. Fair value is defined in the authoritative guidance as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A fair value hierarchy was established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:
| 10 |
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, are observable either directly or indirectly.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs based on the Company's assumptions.
The Company is required to use observable market data if such data is available without undue cost and effort
The following table presents certain investments and liabilities of the Company’s financial assets measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
| Fair value of Derivative Liability-March 31, 2013 | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | |||||||
| Fair value of Derivative Liability-December 31, 2012 | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | $ | 3,221,138 | $ | 3,221,138 | |||||||
Cash Concentration
At times, cash balances may exceed federally insured amounts and potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk. Management believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to these cash balances because of its assessment of the creditworthiness and financial viability of the respective financial institutions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements did not or are not believed to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future condensed consolidated financial statements.
Reclassification
In presenting the Company’s statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company reclassified certain salary and consulting expenses in the aggregate of $68,000 previously reflected as operating expenses to research and development expenses.
In presenting the Company’s statement of operations from inception to March 31, 2013, the Company reclassified certain salary and consulting expenses in the aggregate $531,500 previously reflected as operating expenses to research and development expenses.
| 3. | Certain relationships and related transactions |
Accounts Payable to related parties
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had accounts payable to related parties in the amount of $70,589 and $65,192, respectively. These amounts are unpaid Directors Fees and expenses incurred by officers and directors.
Accrued expense due to related parties
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company accrued the unpaid salaries, unused vacation and the corresponding payroll taxes of its employees in the aggregate of $413,378 and $468,086, respectively. Included in these accruals are accrued vacation and payroll taxes in the aggregate of $57,949 and $57,657, respectively, and the unpaid salaries of the former President of the Company of $245,429 and $255,429, respectively, and the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company of $110,000 and $155,000, respectively. The Company agreed to a monthly payment of $5,000 up to $15,000 to these former officers of the Company until their unpaid salaries are fully settled.
| 11 |
Consulting fees paid to related parties
Ryan Zinke, a director of the Company, is the Chief Executive Officer of consulting firm, Continental Divide LLC. During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred fees for consulting services of $15,000 and $0, respectively.
| 4. | Capital stock |
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued 14,344,600 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants at $0.25 to $0.30 per share for gross proceeds of $4,097,777. The Company incurred direct costs in the amount of $68,500 in commissions paid on warrants exercised by foreign (non-U.S.) investors for aggregate net proceeds of $4,029,277.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock for consulting services provided valued at $49,000, or $0.98 per share. The shares issued were valued at the trading price at the date of the agreement.
| 5. | Stock options and warrants |
The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in capital raising transactions, for services and for financing costs. Options vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date.
Options
The Company currently issues stock options to employees, directors and consultants under the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the Plan). The Company could issue options under the Plan to acquire up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock. In February 2006, the board approved an amendment to the Plan (approved by the Shareholders in May 2006), increasing the authorized shares by 2,000,000 shares to 7,000,000 shares. At March 31, 2013, 2,750,442 were available to be granted under the Plan. Prior to 2004, the Company granted 3,250,000 options outside the Plan to officers of the Company.
The following table summarizes certain information about the Company’s stock purchase options from January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2013:
| Options | Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
||||||||||||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2013 | 27,278,098 | $ | 0.27 | |||||||||||||
| Granted | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Exercised | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Forfeited or expired | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at March 31, 2013 | 27,278,098 | $ | 0.27 | 7.8 | $ | 20,254,356 | ||||||||||
| Vested and exercisable at March 31, 2013 | 13,718,098 | $ | 0.29 | 7.6 | $ | 9,948,756 | ||||||||||
| 12 |
The weighted average exercise prices, remaining contractual lives for options granted, exercisable, and expected to vest under the Plan as of March 31, 2013 were as follows:
| Outstanding Options | Exercisable Options | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Option Exercise Price Per Share |
Shares | Life (Years) |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||
| $ 0.21 - $ 0.99 | 27,196,679 | 7.8 | $ | .27 | 13,636,679 | $ | 0.28 | |||||||||||||||
| $ 1.00 - $ 1.99 | 81,419 | 2.5 | 1.36 | 81,419 | 1.36 | |||||||||||||||||
| 27,278,098 | 7.8 | $ | 0.27 | 13,718,098 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||||||||||
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company amortized $404,587 of compensation cost based on the vesting of the options granted to employees in prior periods. Future unamortized compensation expense on the outstanding options at March 31, 2013 is $4,727,826.
Warrants
In March 2013, pursuant to a settlement of debt agreement, the Company granted a consultant warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of its common stock with an exercise price of $0.30 per share, vesting immediately and will expire in two years from grant date (see Note 8). The fair value of the warrant amounted to $129,622 using the Black-Scholes Merton valuation model with the following average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 0.26%; dividend yield of 0%; volatility of 132%; and an expected life of two years.
During the period ended March 31, 2013, the Company recognized amortization expense of $24,310 and $23,251 based upon vesting of the warrants granted to an employee and a consultant in prior year, respectively.
The following table summarizes certain information about the Company’s stock purchase warrants from January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2013:
| Warrants | Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||||
| Outstanding at January 1, 2013 | 42,205,507 | $ | 0.31 | |||||||||||||
| Granted | 150,000 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||||
| Exercised | (14,344,600 | ) | 0.29 | |||||||||||||
| Forfeited or expired | (958,723 | ) | 0.35 | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding at March 31, 2013 | 27,052,184 | $ | 0.32 | 1.8 | $ | 18,752,321 | ||||||||||
| Vested and exercisable at March 31, 2013 | 25,685,517 | $ | 0.32 | 1.5 | $ | 17,781,988 | ||||||||||
| 13 |
|
Outstanding Warrants | Exercisable Warrants | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrant Exercise Price Per Share |
Shares | Life (Years) |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||
| $ 0.25 - $ 0.99 | 26,552,184 | 1.8 | $ | .30 | 25,185,517 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||||||||||
| $ 1.00 - $ 1.99 | 500,000 | 1.3 | 1.00 | 500,000 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||
| 27,052,184 | 1.8 | $ | 0.32 | 25,685,517 | $ | 0.32 | ||||||||||||||||
Future unamortized compensation expense on the outstanding warrants at March 31, 2013 is $226,893.
| 6. | Research and development |
AOT Testing
The Company is currently conducting research and development of its AOT technology prototypes in a testing facility in Midwest, Wyoming, located at the U.S. Department of Energy Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center, Naval Petroleum Reserve #3 (US DOE). The Company constructs the AOT technology prototypes through the assistance of various third party entities, located in Casper, Wyoming. Costs incurred and expensed includes fees charged by the US DOE, purchase of test equipment, pipeline pumping equipment, crude oil tank batteries, viscometers, SCADA systems, computer equipment and other related equipment and various logistical expenses for the purposes of evaluating and testing its AOT prototypes.
The Company incurred costs of $219,680 and $188,591 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and has been reflected in Research and Development expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Temple University Research & Development Agreement
On August 1, 2011, the Company and Temple University (“Temple”) entered into two (2) Exclusive License Agreements (collectively, the “License Agreements”) relating to Temple’s patent applications, patents and technical information pertaining to technology associated with an electric and/or magnetic field assisted fuel injector system (the “First Temple License”), and to technology to reduce crude oil viscosity (the “Second Temple License”). The License Agreements are exclusive and the territory licensed to the Company is worldwide and replace previously issued License Agreements.
Pursuant to the two licensing agreements, the Company agreed to pay Temple the following: (i) non-refundable license maintenance fee of $300,000; (ii) annual maintenance fees of $187,500; (iii) royalty fee ranging from 4% up to 7% from revenues generated from the licensing agreements; and (iv) 25% of all revenues generated from sub-licensees to secure or maintain the sub-license or option thereon. Temple also agreed to cancel $37,500 of the amount due if the Company agrees to fund at least $250,000 in research or development of Temple’s patent rights licensed to the Company. The term of the licenses commenced in August 2011 and will expire upon the expiration of the patents. The agreement can also be terminated by either party upon notification under terms of the licensing agreements or if the Company ceases the development of the patent or failure to commercialize the patent rights.
Total expenses recognized during the period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 pursuant to these two agreements amounted to $46,875 for both periods and has been reflected in Research and Development expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
| 14 |
As of March 31, 2013, there were no revenues generated from these two licenses.
As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company accrued a total of $162,500 and $125,000 respectively pursuant to these licensing agreements which are included as part of Accounts Payable – licensing agreement in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In January 2013, the Company and Temple agreed to defer payment of the amount due pending renegotiation of the agreement. As of the date of this quarterly report, the amount due is currently past due and the Company deemed in default. The Company has not received any termination notice or notice of default from Temple and is currently renegotiating the existing agreement.
Temple University Sponsored Research Agreement
On March 19, 2012, the Company entered into a Sponsored Research Agreement (“Research Agreement”) with Temple University (“Temple”), whereby Temple, under the direction of Dr. Rongjia Tao, will perform ongoing research related to the Company’s AOT device (the “Project”), for the period April 1, 2012, through April 1, 2014. All rights and title to intellectual property resulting from Temple’s work related to the Project shall be subject to the Exclusive License Agreements between Temple and the Company, dated August 1, 2011. In exchange for Temple’s research efforts on the Project, the Company has agreed to pay Temple $500,000, payable in quarterly installments of $62,500.
During the period ended March 31, 2013, the Company recognized a total of $62,500 pursuant to this agreement and has been reflected in Research and Development expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
As of March 31, 2013, the Company accrued a total of $250,000 pursuant to this agreement which is included as part of Accounts Payable – licensing agreement in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. There was no such amount in 2012.
In January 2013, the Company and Temple agreed to defer payment of the amount due pending renegotiation of the agreement.
| 7. | Derivative liability |
In June 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. Under the authoritative guidance, effective January 1, 2010, instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions are deemed to be derivative instruments. The strike price of the warrants issued by the Company, in connection with certain convertible note offerings made during 2009 and 2010, in the aggregate of 8,522,500 warrants, exercisable at $0.30 per share, contains exercise prices that may fluctuate based on the occurrence of future offerings or events. As a result, these warrants were not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock. The Company characterized the fair value of these warrants as derivative liabilities upon issuance. The FASB’s guidance requires the fair value of these liabilities be re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the accompanying statement of operations. At December 31, 2012, a total of 4,412,500 warrants remain outstanding with a fair value of $3,221,138.
In January 2013, 4,112,500 warrants were exercised and the remaining 300,000 warrants expired unexercised at which time the warrants had a fair value of $3,441,752, which resulted in a loss during the period ended March 31, 2013 of $220,614 due to the change in the fair value of the derivative liability. Furthermore, as a result of the exercise and expiration of these warrants, the Company recorded a gain of $3,441,752 due to the extinguishment of the corresponding derivative liability.
The derivative liabilities were valued using a probability weighted average series of Black-Scholes-Merton models as a valuation technique, which approximates the Monte Carlo and other binominal valuation techniques with the following assumptions:
| Fair Value of Warrants | ||||||||
January 15, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.09% | 0.02% | ||||||
| Expected volatility | 165% | 165% | ||||||
| Expected life (in years) | 0.04 | 0.04 | ||||||
| Expected dividend yield | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| Fair Value: | ||||||||
| 2009 Fall Warrants | $ | 3,441,752 | $ | 3,221,138 | ||||
| Total Fair Value | $ | 3,441,752 | $ | 3,221,138 | ||||
| 15 |
The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield available on U.S. Treasury securities. The Company estimates volatility based on the historical volatility of its common stock. The expected life warrants are based on the expiration date of the related warrants. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not paid dividends to stockholders in the past nor is it expected to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
| 8. | Loss on Settlement of Debt |
In March 2013, the Company settled a debt incurred in prior year amounting to $147,328 for $85,000 plus a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $129,622 (see Note 5). As a result, the Company also recognized a loss of $67,294 on the settlement.
| 9. | Commitments and contingencies |
Legal matters
There is no litigation of any significance with the exception of the matters that have arisen under, and are being handled in, the normal course of business.
| 10. | Subsequent events |
Increase in Outstanding Shares
During the period from April 1, 2013 through April 30, 2013, the Company issued 52,000 shares of its common stock upon exercise of warrants for aggregate proceeds of $15,600.
| 16 |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include predictions regarding our future:
● revenues and profits;
● customers;
● research and development expenses and efforts;
● scientific and other third-party test results;
● sales and marketing expenses and efforts;
● liquidity and sufficiency of existing cash;
● technology and products;
● the outcome of pending or threatened litigation; and
● the effect of recent accounting pronouncements on our financial condition and results of operations
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “expects”, “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “continues,” or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements.
Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a development stage Company that has not yet generated any significant revenues since our inception in February 1998. We have devoted the bulk of our efforts to the completion of the design, and the commercial manufacturing of our production models, and testing of devices and the promotion of our commercialized crude oil pipeline products in the upstream and midstream energy sector. We anticipate that these efforts will continue during 2013.
Our expenses to date have been funded primarily through the sale of shares of common stock and convertible debt, as well as proceeds from the exercise of stock purchase warrants and options. We raised capital in 2012 and will need to raise substantial additional capital in 2013, and possibly beyond, to fund our sales and marketing efforts, continuing research and development, and certain other expenses, until our revenue base grows sufficiently.
Results of Operations
We did not generate any revenue for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
Operating expenses were $1,212,884 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $1,869,905 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, a decrease of $657,021. This decrease is attributable to decreases in non-cash expenses of $456,828 and cash expenses of $200,193. Specifically, the decrease in non-cash expense is attributable to decreases in stock and warrants given to consultants and employees of $452,120 and depreciation of $4,708. The decrease in cash expense is attributable to decreases in consulting and professional fees of $201,218, travel and related expenses of $26,098, office and other expenses of $20,869, offset by an increase in salaries and corporate expenses of $47,992.
Research and development expenses were $329,055 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to $235,466 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, an increase of $93,589. This increase is attributable to a decrease in salaries and consultant fees charged to research and development $23,500 and an increase in product testing, research and supplies of $117,089.
Other income and expense were $3,124,739 income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, compared to $3,364,979 expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, an increase in income of $6,489,718. This increase is attributable to increases in gain on extinguishment of derivative liabilities of $3,441,752, reduction in interest and financing expense of $2,462,607, gain from change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $918,863, offset by a decrease in other income of $333,504 due to settlement of debt and accruals.
| 17 |
We had a net income of $1,582,800, or $0.01 per share, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013, compared to a net loss of $5,470,350, or $0.05 per share, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012. We expect to incur net loss in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 primarily attributable to continued research and development, operating and marketing-related expenditures without the benefit of any significant revenue for the remainder of the year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since its inception, we have been primarily engaged in organizational and pre-operating activities. We have generated insignificant revenues and have incurred accumulated losses of $80,799,054 from February 18, 1998 (Inception) through March 31, 2013. The Company has experienced recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows since inception, and has financed its working capital requirements through the recurring sale of its convertible notes and equity securities. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional funds and implement our business plan. Our operations from inception, February 18, 1998 to March 31, 2013 have been funded through issuances of our common stock and convertible notes. As of March 31, 2013, we raised an aggregate of $36,928,120 of which $18,400,888 was from the sale of convertible notes and $18,527,323 was from the sale of stock and exercise of warrants and options.
On March 31, 2013, we had cash on hand in the amount of $4,482,552. In addition to the funds on hand, we will require additional funds to continue to operate our business. This includes expenses we will incur in connection with license agreements; product development and commercialization of the AOT technologies; costs to manufacture and ship our products; costs to design and implement an effective system of internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures; costs of maintaining our status as a public company by filing periodic reports with the SEC and costs required to protect our intellectual property. In addition, we have contractual commitments for salaries to one of our executive officers pursuant to an employment agreement, severance payments to a former officer and consulting fees, during 2013 and beyond. In light of our financial commitments over the next several months and its liquidity constraints, we have implemented cost reduction measures in all areas of operations. We intend to review these measures on an ongoing basis and make additional decisions as may be required.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our condensed consolidated financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate, on an on-going basis, our estimates and judgments, including those related to the useful life of the assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the condensed consolidated results that we report in our financial statements. The SEC considers an entity’s most critical accounting policies to be those policies that are both most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results of operations and those that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain at the time of estimation.. For a more detailed discussion of the accounting policies of the Company, see Note 2 of Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, require significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Certain significant estimates were made in connection with preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements as described in Note 1 to Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
| 18 |
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges generally are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.
The fair value of the Company's common stock option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the common stock options, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.
Accounting for Warrants and Derivatives
The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses a probability weighted average series Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing models to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation dates.
The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements did not or are not believed to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Not applicable.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
In February 2012, the Company began the process of designing and implementing various financial controls from within our finance department under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Furthermore, the Company also hired an outside consultant to further enhance these internal controls, policies and procedures. In March 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved and began the implementation of these internal controls, policies and procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Internal Controls Policy and Sarbanes-Oxley 302 matrix approved by the Board of Directors during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 have been implemented and are functioning as planned. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) were effective as of March 31, 2013.
Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal control consists of procedures which are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that our transactions are properly authorized, recorded and reported and our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use, to permit the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
| 19 |
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transaction and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitation, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives.
Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013 based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) were effective as of March 31, 2013.
Our annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting and management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only Management’s report in this annual report.
| 20 |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There is no litigation of any significance with the exception of the matters that have arisen under, and are being handled in, the normal course of business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, which we filed with the SEC on March 21, 2013.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Other Issuances
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we issued 14,344,600 shares of common stock upon exercise of warrants at $0.25 to $0.30 per share for aggregate net proceeds of $4,029,277.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock for consulting services valued at $49,000 or $0.98 per share.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None
Item 5. Other Information
Increase in Outstanding Shares
During the period from April 1, 2013 through April 30, 2013, we issued 52,000 shares of our common stock upon exercise of warrants for aggregate proceeds of $15,600.
| 21 |
Item 6. Exhibits
| Exhibit No. | Description | ||
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Quarterly Report Pursuant to Rule 13(a)-15(e) or Rule 15(d)-15(e) | ||
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13(a)-15(e) or Rule 15(d)-15(e) | ||
| 32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | ||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | ||
| 101.SCH | XBRL Schema Document | ||
| 101.CAL | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | ||
| 101.LAB | XBRL Label Linkbase Document | ||
| 101.PRE | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document | ||
| 101.DEF | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | ||
| 22 |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
| SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC. | |||
| Date: May 6, 2013 | By: | /s/ GREGG BIGGER | |
| Gregg Bigger | |||
| Chief Financial Officer | |||
| 23 |
EXHIBITS
| Exhibit No. | Description | ||
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Quarterly Report Pursuant to Rule 13(a)-15(e) or Rule 15(d)-15(e) | ||
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report Pursuant to Rule 13(a)-15(e) or Rule 15(d)-15(e) | ||
| 32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quarterly Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | ||
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | ||
| 101.SCH | XBRL Schema Document | ||
| 101.CAL | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | ||
| 101.LAB | XBRL Label Linkbase Document | ||
| 101.PRE | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document | ||
| 101.DEF | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | ||
| 24 |
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Cecil Bond Kyte, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Save the World Air, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(d)-15(f) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
2. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 6, 2013 | /s/ CECIL BOND KYTE |
| Cecil Bond Kyte | |
| Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
AND RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Gregg Bigger, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Save the World Air, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(d)-15(f) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 6, 2013 | /s/ GREGG BIGGER |
| Gregg Bigger | |
| Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Acting Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Save the World Air, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 6, 2013 | /s/ CECIL BOND KYTE |
| Cecil Bond Kyte | |
| Chief Executive Officer | |
| Date: May 6, 2013 | /s/ GREGG BIGGER |
| Gregg Bigger | |
| Chief Financial Officer | |
|
6. Research and development (Details Narrative) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 181 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|
| Research and Development Arrangement, Contract to Perform for Others [Line Items] | |||
| Research and development expenses | $ 219,680 | $ 188,591 | $ 8,998,736 |
| License maintenance fee paid | 162,500 | 125,000 | |
|
Temple University Research Development Agreement [Member]
|
|||
| Research and Development Arrangement, Contract to Perform for Others [Line Items] | |||
| Research and development expenses | 46,875 | ||
|
Sponsored Research Agreement [Member]
|
|||
| Research and Development Arrangement, Contract to Perform for Others [Line Items] | |||
| Research and development expenses | 62,500 | ||
| License maintenance fee paid | $ 250,000 | ||
|
2. Summary of significant accounting policies (Details Narrative) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 181 Months Ended |
|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|
| Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Details Narrative | ||
| Salary and consulting expenses | $ 68,000 | $ 531,500 |
|
3. Certain relationships and related transactions
|
3 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
|
| Certain Relationships And Related Transactions | |
| Note 3. Certain relationships and related transactions | Accounts Payable to related parties
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had accounts payable to related parties in the amount of $70,589 and $65,192, respectively. These amounts are unpaid Directors Fees and expenses incurred by officers and directors.
Accrued expense due to related parties
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company accrued the unpaid salaries, unused vacation and the corresponding payroll taxes of its employees in the aggregate of $413,378 and $468,086, respectively. Included in these accruals are accrued vacation and payroll taxes in the aggregate of $57,949 and $57,657, respectively, and the unpaid salaries of the former President of the Company of $245,429 and $255,429, respectively, and the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company of $110,000 and $155,000, respectively. The Company agreed to a monthly payment of $5,000 up to $15,000 to these former officers of the Company until their unpaid salaries are fully settled.
Consulting fees paid to related parties
Ryan Zinke, a director of the Company, is the Chief Executive Officer of consulting firm, Continental Divide LLC. During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred fees for consulting services of $15,000 and $0, respectively. |