10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-K

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2007

or

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13

or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file number: 0-50269

ML SELECT FUTURES I L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	13-3879393
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

c/o Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC

Hopewell Corporate Campus, Building No. 2

1200 Merrill Lynch Drive – First Floor

Pennington, New Jersey 08534

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (609) 274-5838

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Partnership Units

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x Noo

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes o No x

The limited partnership units of the registrant are not publicly traded.  Accordingly, there is no aggregate market value for the registrant’s outstanding equity that is readily determinable.

As of January 31, 2008, limited partnership units with a Net Asset Value of $236,000,771 were held by non-affiliates.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

The registrant’s 2007 Annual Report and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, the annual report to security holders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, is incorporated by reference into Part II, Item 8, and Part IV hereof and filed as an Exhibit herewith. Copies of the annual report are available free of charge by contacting Alternative Investments Client Services at 1-866-MER-ALTS.

ML SELECT FUTURES I L. P.

ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2007 ON FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

		PAGE
	PART I
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	9
Item 2.	Properties	9
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	9
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	9
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	9
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	11
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks	21
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	25
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	25
Item 9A(T).	Controls and Procedures	25
Item 9B.	Other Information	26
	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	27
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	29
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
	Stockholder Matters	29
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	29
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	30
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	31

PART I

Item 1:Business

(a)General Development of Business:

ML Select Futures I L.P. (the “Partnership”) was organized under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act on August 4, 1995 under the name ML Chesapeake L.P. The Partnership began trading on April 16, 1996 and trades in the international futures and forward markets applying proprietary trading strategies under the direction of Sunrise Capital Partners, LLC (“Sunrise”). The Partnership’s objective is to achieve, through speculative trading, substantial capital appreciation over time.

Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC (“MLAI”), the Sponsor (“Sponsor”) and general partner of the Partnership, is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”). Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“MLPF&S”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch, is the Partnership’s commodity broker. As used herein, the capitalized term “MLAI” also refers to the general partner at times when its name was MLIM Alternative Strategies LLC, as applicable.

The proceeds of the Partnership’s units of limited partnership interest (the “Units”) were initially allocated to the Partnership’s initial trading adviser, Chesapeake Capital Corporation (“Chesapeake”). On July 1, 1998, Sunrise replaced Chesapeake as the Partnership’s sole trading advisor (“Advisor”).

As of December 31, 2007, the capitalization of the Partnership was $225,754,363 and the Net Asset Value per Unit, originally $100 as of April 1, 1996, had risen to $250.55.

The highest month-end Net Asset Value per Unit since Sunrise began trading the Partnership was $261.40 (June 30, 2007) and the lowest was $127.01 (July 31, 1998).

(b)Financial Information about Segments:

The Partnership’s business constitutes only one segment for financial reporting purposes, i.e., a speculative “commodity pool”. The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services.

(c)Narrative Description of Business:

General

The Partnership trades in the international futures and forward markets with the objective of achieving substantial capital appreciation.

The Partnership has entered into an advisory agreement with Sunrise whereby Sunrise trades the Partnership’s assets through a managed account using its Expanded Diversified Program.  In the Expanded Diversified Program, Sunrise applies its trend-following systems to a broadly-diversified portfolio of futures and forward markets, including, but not limited to, precious and industrial metals, grains, petroleum products, soft commodities, domestic and foreign interest rate futures, domestic and foreign stock indices (including S&P 500, DAX, and Nikkei 225), currencies and their cross rates, and minor currency markets.

One of the aims of the Partnership is to provide diversification to a limited portion of the risk segment of the Limited Partners’ portfolios into an investment field that has historically often demonstrated a low degree of performance correlation with traditional stock and bond holdings.

Employees

The Partnership has no employees.

1

Sunrise and its Expanded Diversified Program

Sunrise currently offers five trading programs, one of which, the Expanded Diversified Trading Program is used in managing the Partnership’s assets.  In the Expanded Diversified Trading Program, Sunrise applies its trend-following systems to a broadly-diversified portfolio of futures and forward markets, including, but not limited to, precious and industrial metals, grains, petroleum products, soft commodities, domestic and foreign interest rate futures, domestic and foreign stock indices (including S&P 500, DAX and Nikkei 225), currencies and their cross rates, and minor currency markets (collectively, “Commodity Interests”).  Sunrise may trade these markets on any U.S. or non-U.S. exchange.  Sunrise may also trade options for the Partnership in the future; in the event that it does, these options will be considered Commodity Interests.  As of December 31, 2007, Sunrise was managing approximately $1.589 billion (excluding “notional” funds) in the futures and forward markets.

Sunrise’s Programs Are Technical and Trend-Following Systems

The mathematical models used by Sunrise’s programs are technical systems, generating trading signals on the basis of statistical research into past market prices.  Sunrise does not attempt to predict or forecast changes in price through fundamental economic analysis.  The trading methodologies employed by Sunrise are based on programs analyzing a large number of interrelated mathematical and statistical formulas and techniques, which are quantitative and proprietary in nature.

As a trend-following advisor, Sunrise’s objective is to participate in major price trends—sustained price movements either up or down.  Such price trends may be relatively infrequent.  Some trend-following advisors have anticipated that over half of their positions will be unprofitable.  Their strategy is based on making sufficiently large profits from the trends which they identify and follow to generate overall profits despite the more numerous but, hopefully, smaller losses incurred on the majority of their positions.

The Markets Traded by Sunrise for the Partnership

The Partnership trades on a variety of United States and foreign futures exchanges.  Applicable exchange rules differ significantly among different countries and exchanges.  The Partnership’s entire off-exchange trading takes place substantially in the highly liquid, institutionally based currency forward markets.  The forward markets are generally unregulated, and in its forward trading the Partnership does not deposit margin with respect to its positions.  Spot and forward currency contracts currently are the only non-exchange traded instruments held by the Partnership.

To date, approximately 20% to 30% of the Partnership’s trades by volume have been in forward currency contracts, but from time to time the percentage of the Partnership’s trading represented by forward currency trades may fall substantially outside this range.  Because the Partnership need not deposit any margin with Merrill Lynch in respect of the Partnership’s forward trading, the Partnership’s additional risk in trading in such unregulated markets should be limited to a possible loss of unrealized profits on open forward positions which a counterparty accessed through Merrill Lynch would not, in the event of its bankruptcy, be able to pay to Merrill Lynch for the account of the Partnership.

As in the case of its market sector allocations, the Partnership’s commitments to different types of markets — U.S. and non-U.S., regulated and unregulated — differ substantially from time to time as well as over time.  The Partnership has no policy restricting its relative commitment to any of these different types of markets, although generally the bulk of the Partnership’s trading takes place on regulated exchanges.

The Partnership’s financial statements contain information relating to the types of markets traded by the Partnership.  There can, however, be no assurance as to which markets the Partnership may trade or in which markets the Partnership’s trading may be concentrated at any one time or over time.

2

Use of Proceeds and Cash Management Income

Subscription Proceeds

The Partnership’s cash is used as security for and to pay the Partnership’s trading losses as well as its expenses and redemptions. The primary use of the proceeds of the sale of the Units is to permit Sunrise to trade on a speculative basis in a wide range of different futures and forwards markets on behalf of the Partnership.  While being used for this purpose, the Partnership’s assets are also generally available for cash management, as more fully described below under “Available Assets”.

Market Sectors

In the Expanded Diversified Program, Sunrise applies its trend-following systems to a broadly diversified portfolio of futures and forward markets.  Commodity interests currently included in the Expanded Diversified Program are: currencies (majors, minors, & crossrates), metals (gold, silver, copper, aluminum, nickel, and zinc), indices (S&P 500, DAX, and Nikkei 225), interest rates (T-bonds, T-Notes, Eurodollars, Euro-Bund, three-month Euro Futures, Euro BOBL, Japanese Government Bond, Euroyen, 90-day Australian Bank Accepted Bill (“Aussie Bill”) and three-month Canadian Bankers’ Acceptance Note), energy (crude oil and natural gas) and agriculturals (soybeans, soymeal, corn, wheat, coffee and sugar and cotton).

Market Types

The Partnership trades on a variety of United States and foreign futures exchanges.  Substantially all of the Partnership’s off-exchange trading takes place in the highly liquid, institutionally based currency forward markets.

Many of the Partnership’s currency trades are executed in the spot and forward foreign exchange markets (the “FX Markets”) where there are no direct execution costs.  Instead, the participants, banks and dealers in the FX Markets take a “spread” between the prices at which they are prepared to buy and sell a particular currency and such spreads are built into the pricing of the spot or forward contracts with the Partnership.

As in the case of its market sector allocations, the Partnership’s commitments to different types of markets – U.S. and non-U.S. regulated and non-regulated differ substantially from time to time, as well as over time.  The Partnership has no policy restricting its relative commitment to any of these different types of markets.

Custody of Assets

All of the Partnership’s trading assets are currently held in Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) regulated customer accounts at MLPF&S.

Available Assets

The Partnership earns income, as described below, on its “Available Assets”, which can be generally described as the cash actually held by the Partnership.   Available Assets are held primarily in U.S. dollars and are comprised of the Partnership’s cash balances held in the offset accounts (as described below) – which include “open trade equity” (unrealized gain and loss on open positions) on United States futures contracts, which is paid into or out of the Partnership’s account on a daily basis; the Partnership’s cash balance in foreign currencies derived from its trading in non-U.S. dollar denominated futures and options contracts, which includes open trade equity on those exchanges which settle gains and losses on open positions in such contracts prior to closing out such positions.  Available Assets do not include and the Partnership does not earn interest income on the Partnership’s  unrealized gains or losses on its open forward, commodity option and certain foreign futures positions since such gains and losses are not collected or paid until such positions are closed out.

3

The Partnership’s Available Assets may be greater than, less than or equal to the Partnership’s Net Asset Value (on which the redemption value of the Units is based) primarily because Net Asset Value reflects all gains and losses on open positions as well as accrued but unpaid expenses.

Interest Earned on the Partnership’s U.S. Dollar Available Assets

The Partnership’s U.S. dollar Available Assets are held in cash in offset accounts.

Offset accounts are non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts maintained with banks unaffiliated with Merrill Lynch.  An integral feature of the offset arrangements is that the participating banks specifically acknowledge that the offset accounts are MLPF&S customer accounts, not subject to any Merrill Lynch liability.

MLPF&S credits the Partnership, as of the end of each month, with interest at the effective daily 91-day Treasury bill rate on the average daily U.S. dollar Available Assets held in the offset accounts during such month.

The use of the offset account arrangements for the Partnership’s U.S. dollar Available Assets may be discontinued by Merrill Lynch at any time.  If Merrill Lynch were to terminate the offset arrangements, it would attempt to invest all of the Partnership’s U.S. dollar Available Assets to the maximum practicable extent in short-term Treasury bills.  All interest earned on the U.S. dollar Available Assets so invested would be paid to the Partnership but MLAI would expect the amount of such interest to be less than that available to the Partnership under the offset account arrangements.  The remaining U.S. dollar Available Assets of the Partnership would be kept in cash to meet variation margin payments and pay expenses, but would not earn interest for the Partnership.

The banks at which the offset accounts are maintained make available to Merrill Lynch interest-free overnight credits, loans or overdrafts in the amount of the Partnership’s U.S. dollar Available Assets held in the offset accounts, charging Merrill Lynch a small fee for this service.  The economic benefits derived by Merrill Lynch – net of the interest credits paid to the Partnership and the fee paid to the offset banks – from the offset accounts have not exceeded 0.75% per annum of the Partnership’s average daily U.S. dollar Available Assets held in the offset accounts.  These revenues to Merrill Lynch are in addition to the Brokerage Commissions and Administrative Fees paid by the Partnership to MLPF&S and MLAI, respectively.

Interest Paid by Merrill Lynch on the Partnership’s Non-U.S. Dollar Available Assets

Under the single currency margining system implemented for the Partnership, the Partnership does not deposit foreign currencies to margin trading in non-U.S. dollar denominated futures contracts and options, if any.  MLPF&S provides the necessary margin, permitting the Partnership to retain the monies which would otherwise be required for such margin as part of the Partnership’s U.S. dollar Available Assets.  The Partnership does not earn interest on foreign margin deposits provided by MLPF&S. The Partnership does, however, earn interest on its non-U.S. dollar Available Assets.  Specifically, the Partnership is credited by Merrill Lynch with interest at prevailing short-term local rates on assets and net gains on non-U.S. dollar denominated positions for such gains actually held in cash by the Partnership.  Merrill Lynch charges the Partnership Merrill Lynch’s cost of financing realized and unrealized losses on such positions.

The Partnership holds foreign currency gains and finances foreign currency losses on an interim basis until converted into U.S. dollars and either paid into or out of the Partnership’s U.S. dollar Available Assets.  Foreign currency gains or losses on open positions are not converted into U.S. dollars until the positions are closed.  Assets of the Partnership while held in foreign currencies are subject to exchange rate risk.

4

Charges

The following table summarizes the charges incurred by the Partnership during 2007, 2006, and 2005.

	2007			2006			2005
Charges	Dollar Amount	% of Average Month-End Net Assets		Dollar Amount	% of Average Month-End Net Assets		Dollar Amount	% of Average Month-End Net Assets
Brokerage Commissions	$16,351,736	5.66	%	$19,872,678	5.61	%	$27,053,850	5.58	%
Administrative and Filing Fees	993,261	0.35	%	1,153,304	0.33	%	1,479,720	0.31	%
Profit Shares	671,266	0.23	%	49,055	0.01	%	—	—
Total Expenses	$18,016,263	6.24	%	$21,075,037	5.95	%	$28,533,570	5.89	%

The foregoing table does not reflect the bid-ask spreads paid by the Partnership on its forward trading, or the benefits which may be derived by Merrill Lynch from the deposit of certain of the Partnership’s U.S. dollar assets maintained at MLPF&S.

Each Unit is subject to the same charges.  The Partnership’s average month-end Net Assets during 2007, 2006 and 2005 equaled $288,689,351, $354,244,209 and $484,905,224, respectively.

During 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Partnership earned $13,248,150, $17,187,972 and $15,719,664, in interest income, or approximately 4.59%, 4.85% and 3.24%,  of the Partnership’s average month-end Net Assets.

Description of Current Charges

Recipient	Nature of Payment	Amount of Payment
MLPF&S	Brokerage Commissions	A flat-rate monthly brokerage commission of 0.458 of 1% (a 5.5% annual rate) of the Partnership’s month-end assets (including the monthly interest credit and before reduction for accrued month-end redemptions, distributions, brokerage commissions, administrative fees or Profit Shares, in each case as of the end of the month of determination). Such commissions cover Sunrise’s monthly consulting fee as well as all floor brokerage and exchange, clearing and National Futures Association (“NFA”) fees incurred in the Partnership’s trading.
		During 2007, 2006, and 2005, the round-turn (each purchase and sale or sale and purchase of a single futures contract) equivalent rate of the Partnership’s flat-rate Brokerage Commissions was approximately $251, $591 and $370, respectively.

5

MLPF&S	Use of Partnership assets	Merrill Lynch may derive an economic benefit from the deposit of certain of the Partnership’s U.S. dollar assets in accounts maintained at MLPF&S.
MLAI	Administrative Fees	A flat-rate monthly charge of 0.021 of 1% (0.25% annual rate) of the Partnership’s month-end assets (including the monthly interest credit and before reduction for accrued month-end redemptions, distributions, brokerage commissions, administrative fees or Profit Shares, in each case as of the end of the month of determination). Additionally, the Partnership reimburses MLAI the actual cost of the State of New Jersey annual filing fee assessed on a per partner basis with a maximum of $250,000 per year. The administrative fees cover the Partnership’s routine administrative expenses and MLAI will absorb any administrative costs incurred during any calendar year in excess of the foregoing amount.
Merrill Lynch International Bank (“MLIB”) (or an affiliate); Other counterparties	Bid–ask spreads	Bid–ask spreads on forward and related trades.
MLIB (or an affiliate); Other counterparties	EFP differentials	Certain of the Partnership’s currency trades may be executed in the form of “exchange of futures for physical” transactions, in which a counterparty (which may be MLIB or an affiliate) receives an additional “differential” spread for exchanging the Partnership’s cash currency positions for equivalent futures positions.
Sunrise	Annual profit shares	23% of any New Trading Profits generated by the Partnership as a whole, excluding interest income and after reduction for a portion of the Brokerage Commissions, as of the end of each calendar year.
Sunrise	Consulting Fees	MLPF&S pays Sunrise monthly Consulting Fees of 0.083 of 1% of the Partnership’s month-end assets (a 1% annual rate), after reduction for a portion of the Brokerage Commissions.
MLPF&S; Others	Reimbursement of delivery, insurance, storage and any other extraordinary charges; taxes (if any)	Actual payments to third parties, which are expected to be negligible.
MLPF&S; Others	Extraordinary expenses	Actual costs incurred; none paid to date.

6

Regulation

MLAI, the Partnership and MLPF&S are each subject to regulation by the CFTC and the NFA.  Other than in respect of the registration requirements pertaining to the Partnership’s securities under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Partnership is generally not subject to regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  However, MLAI itself is registered as an “investment adviser” under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.  MLPF&S is also regulated by the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (the “FINRA”).

(d)Financial Information about Geographic Areas

The Partnership does not engage in material operations in foreign countries, nor is a material portion of the Partnership’s revenue derived from customers in foreign countries. The Partnership trades on a number of foreign commodity exchanges.  The Partnership does not engage in the sales of goods or services.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

The Large Size of the Partnership’s Trading Positions Increases the Risk of Sudden, Major Losses

The Partnership takes positions with values up to approximately 15 times its total equity.  Consequently, even small price movements can cause major losses.

Investors Must Not Rely on the Past Performance of Either Sunrise or the Partnership in Deciding Whether to Buy Units

The performance of the Partnership is entirely unpredictable, and the past performance of the Partnership as well as of Sunrise is not necessarily indicative of their future results.

The price data which Sunrise has researched in developing its programs may not reflect the changing dynamics of future markets.  If not, the Expanded Diversified Program would have little chance of being profitable.  An influx of new market participants, changes in market regulation, international political developments, demographic changes and numerous other factors can contribute to once-successful strategies becoming outdated.  Not all of these factors can be identified, much less quantified.  There can be no assurance that Sunrise will trade profitably for the Partnership.

Sunrise Analyzes Only Technical Market Data.  No Economic Factors External to Market Prices Are Analyzed

The Sunrise programs focus exclusively on statistical analysis of market prices.  Consequently, any factor external to the market itself which dominates prices is likely to cause major losses.  For example, a pending political or economic event may be very likely to cause a major price movement, but Sunrise would continue to maintain positions that would incur major losses as a result of such movement, if its programs indicated that it should do so.

The likelihood of the Units being profitable could be materially diminished during periods when events external to the markets themselves have an important impact on prices.  During such periods, Sunrise’s historical price analysis could establish positions on the wrong side of the price movements caused by such events.

Effects of Speculative Position Limits

The CFTC and commodity exchanges have established speculative position limits (referred to as “position limits”) on the maximum futures positions which any person or group of persons acting in concert, may hold or control in particular commodities. All commodity accounts controlled by Sunrise and its principals and their affiliates are combined for speculative position limit purposes.  If such limits were to be reached, Sunrise would be required to reduce the size of the positions which would otherwise be taken for the Partnership in order to avoid exceeding such limits.  Any such reduction could adversely affect the operations and profitability of the Partnership.

7

Lack of the Types of Price Trends Which the Expanded Diversified Program Can Identify Will Cause Major Losses

The Partnership cannot trade profitably unless major price trends occur in at least certain markets that it trades.  Many markets are trendless most of the time, and in static markets Sunrise’s programs are likely to incur losses.  In fact, Sunrise expects more than half of its trades to be unprofitable; it depends on significant gains from a few major trends to offset these losses.  It is not just any price trend, but price trends of the type which Sunrise’s systems have been designed to identify, which are necessary for the Partnership to be profitable.

The Danger to the Partnership of “Whipsaw” Markets

Often, the most unprofitable market conditions for the Partnership are those in which prices “whipsaw,” moving quickly upward, then reversing, then moving upward again, then reversing again.  In such conditions, the programs may establish a series of losing positions based on incorrectly identifying both the brief upward or downward price movements as trends.

The Partnership’s Substantial Expenses Will Cause Losses Unless Offset by Profits

The Partnership’s expenses could, over time, result in significant losses.  Except for the Profit Share these expenses are payable whether or not the Partnership is profitable.  It is also possible for Sunrise to earn a profit share even if the Partnership has a loss. That is because the calculation of our profit share does not include 100% of the costs associated with running the Partnership.

Sunrise’s High Level of Equity Under Management Could Lead to Diminished Returns

Sunrise’s equity under management is approximately $1.589 billion.  The more money Sunrise manages, the more difficult it may be for Sunrise to trade profitably because of the difficulty of trading larger positions without adversely affecting prices and performance.  Large trades may result in more price slippage than smaller orders.

Illiquid Markets Could Make It Impossible for Sunrise to Realize Profits or Limit Losses

In illiquid markets, Sunrise could be unable to capitalize on trading opportunities or close out losing positions.  There are numerous factors which can contribute to market illiquidity, far too many for Sunrise to be able to predict.  There can be no assurance that a market which has been highly liquid in the past will not experience periods of unexpected illiquidity.

Unexpected market illiquidity has caused major losses in recent years in certain sectors.  There can be no assurance that the same will not happen to the Partnership from time to time.  The large size of the positions which Sunrise may acquire for the Partnership increases the risk of illiquidity by both making its positions more difficult to liquidate and increasing the losses incurred while trying to do so.

The Partnership Trades Extensively in Foreign Markets; These Markets Are Less Regulated Than U.S. Markets and Are Subject to Exchange Rate, Market Practice and Political Risks

The Expanded Diversified Program trades a great deal outside the U.S.  From time to time, as much as approximately 40% of the Partnership’s overall market exposure could involve positions taken on foreign markets (excluding foreign exchange transactions in U.S. markets).  Foreign trading involves risks — including exchange-rate exposure, possible governmental intervention and lack of regulation — which U.S. trading does not.  In addition, the Partnership may not have the same access to certain positions on foreign exchanges as do local traders, and the historical market data on which Sunrise bases its strategies may not be as reliable or accessible as it is in the United States.  Certain foreign exchanges may also be in a more or less developmental stage so that prior price histories may not be indicative of current price dynamics.  The rights of clients in the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of a non-U.S. market or broker are also likely to be more limited than in the case of U.S. markets or brokers.

8

The Partnership Could lose Assets and Have Its Trading Disrupted Due to the Bankruptcy of One of the Parties

The Partnership is subject to the risk of insolvency of a counterparty, an exchange, a clearinghouse or MLPF&S.  The Partnership’s assets could be lost or impounded during lengthy bankruptcy proceedings.  Were a substantial portion of the Partnership’s capital tied up in a bankruptcy, MLAI might suspend or limit trading, perhaps causing the Partnership to miss significant profit opportunities.  There are increased risks in dealing with unregulated trading counterparties including the risk that assets may not benefit from the protection afforded to “customer funds” deposited with regulated dealers and brokers.

Item 1B: Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2:Properties

The Partnership does not use any physical properties in the conduct of its business.

The Partnership’s administrative offices are the administrative offices of MLAI (Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, Hopewell Corporate Campus, Building No. 2, 1200 Merrill Lynch Drive – First Floor, Pennington, New Jersey 08534).  MLAI performs administrative services for the Fund from MLAI’s offices.

Item 3:Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 4:Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

PART II

Item 5:Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 5(a)

(a)Market Information:

There is no established public trading market for the Units, and none is likely to develop.  Limited Partners may redeem Units on ten days written notice to MLAI as of the last day of each month at their Net Asset Value, subject to certain early redemption charges.

(b)Holders:

As of December 31, 2007, there were 2,788 holders of Units, including MLAI.

(c)Dividends:

MLAI has not made and does not contemplate making any distributions on the Units.

(d)Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans:

Not applicable.

9

(e)Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities:

Issuance to accredited investors pursuant to Regulation D and Section 4(6) under the Securities Act. The selling agent of the following Class of Units was MLPF&S.

During 2007, the Fund issued Units as set forth in the following chart.

	Subscription
	Amount		Units	NAV
Jan-07	$	39,772	164	$	242.51
Feb-07	384,415		1,536	250.27
Mar-07	708,558		2,913	243.24
Apr-07	407,943		1,750	233.11
May-07	290,759		1,171	248.30
Jun-07	287,417		1,101	257.08
Jul-07	19,866		76	261.40
Aug-07	—		—	246.27
Sep-07	74,788		357	209.49
Oct-07	—		—	223.02
Nov-07	9,985		41	243.54
Dec-07	—		—	245.39
Jan-08	2,355,170		9,400	250.55
Feb-08	—		—	263.68

Item 5(b)

Not applicable.

Item 5(c)

Not applicable.

10

Item 6:   Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Partnership.

Statement of Income	For the Year Ended December 31, 2007			For the Year Ended December 31, 2006			For the Year Ended December 31, 2005			For the Year Ended December 31, 2004			For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
TRADING PROFIT (LOSS):
Realized	$	13,343,726		$	37,752,945		$	(24,222,659	)	$	52,256,615		$	27,402,575
Change in unrealized	(1,451,441		)	(5,477,059		)	3,041,057			(14,070,731		)	16,373,295
Total trading profit (loss)	11,892,285			32,275,886			(21,181,602		)	38,185,884			43,775,870
INVESTMENT INCOME:
Interest	13,248,150			17,187,972			15,719,664			6,875,902			1,831,533
EXPENSES:
Brokerage commissions	16,351,736			19,872,678			27,053,850			26,151,018			10,533,803
Profit Shares	671,266			49,055			-			4,731,366			8,416,558
Administrative and filing fees	993,261			1,153,304			1,479,720			1,641,858			622,464
Total expenses	18,016,263			21,075,037			28,533,570			32,524,242			19,572,825
NET INVESTMENT LOSS	(4,768,113		)	(3,887,065		)	(12,813,906		)	(25,648,340		)	(17,741,292		)
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	7,124,172		$	28,388,821		$	(33,995,508	)	$	12,537,544		$	26,034,578

Balance Sheet Data	December 31, 2007		December 31, 2006		December 31, 2005		December 31, 2004		December 31, 2003
Partners' Capital	$	225,754,363	$	326,172,570	$	396,829,138	$	586,978,366	$	270,488,591
Net Asset Value per Unit	$	250.55	$	242.51	$	224.17	$	234.41	$	224.63

11

The following month-end net asset value per unit information has been derived from financial and accounting data of the Partnership.

MONTH-END NET ASSET VALUE PER INITIAL UNIT

	Jan.		Feb.		Mar.		Apr.		May		June		July		Aug.		Sept.		Oct.		Nov.		Dec.
2003	$	212.87	$	221.65	$	207.96	$	208.62	$	217.96	$	209.68	$	206.45	$	206.34	$	199.40	$	210.45	$	207.90	$	224.63
2004	$	226.76	$	243.15	$	248.26	$	237.31	$	234.35	$	227.99	$	223.83	$	214.07	$	215.06	$	222.39	$	232.33	$	234.41
2005	$	219.59	$	218.75	$	217.11	$	213.97	$	212.55	$	211.75	$	206.46	$	206.27	$	208.46	$	210.63	$	221.59	$	224.17
2006	$	225.13	$	224.83	$	232.20	$	240.27	$	241.84	$	241.05	$	230.50	$	228.68	$	227.51	$	233.62	$	238.87	$	242.51
2007	$	250.27	$	243.24	$	233.11	$	248.30	$	257.08	$	261.40	$	246.27	$	209.49	$	223.02	$	243.54	$	245.39	$	250.55

Pursuant to CFTC policy, monthly performance is presented from January 1, 2003, even though the Units were outstanding prior to such date.

12

ML SELECT FUTURES I L.P.

December 31, 2007

Type of Pool:  Single Advisor/Publicly-Offered/Non-”Principal Protected”(1)

Inception of Trading: April 1996

Aggregate Subscriptions:     $587,490,383

Current Capitalization:    $225,754,363

Worst Monthly Drawdown(2):   (14.94)% (08/07)

Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown(3):   (19.86)% (07/07-08/07)

Net Asset Value per Unit, December 31, 2007: $250.55

Monthly Rates of Return (4)

Month	2007		2006		2005		2004		2003
January	3.20	%	0.43	%	(6.32	)%	0.95	%	8.48	%
February	(2.81	)	(0.14	)	(0.38	)	7.23		4.12
March	(4.16	)	3.28		(0.75	)	2.10		(6.18	)
April	6.52		3.48		(1.45	)	(4.41	)	0.31
May	3.54		0.65		(0.67	)	(1.25	)	4.48
June	1.68		(0.33	)	(0.37	)	(2.71	)	(3.80	)
July	(5.79	)	(4.38	)	(2.50	)	(1.82	)	(1.54	)
August	(14.94	)	(0.79	)	(0.09	)	(4.36	)	(0.05	)
September	6.46		(0.51	)	1.06		0.46		(3.36	)
October	9.20		2.69		1.04		3.41		5.54
November	0.76		2.25		5.20		4.47		(1.21	)
December	2.10		1.52		1.16		0.89		8.05
Compound Annual Rate of Return	3.31	%	8.18	%	(4.37	)%	4.35	%	14.47	%

(1) Certain funds, including funds sponsored by MLAI, are structured so as to guarantee to investors that their investment will be worth no less than a specified amount (typically, the initial purchase price) as of a date certain after the date of investment.  The CFTC refers to such funds as “principal protected”.  The Partnership has no such feature.

(2) Worst Monthly Drawdown represents the largest negative Monthly Rate of Return experienced since January 1, 2003 by the Partnership; a drawdown is measured on the basis of month-end Net Asset Value only, and does not reflect intra-month figures.

(3) Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown represents the greatest percentage decline since January 1, 2003 from a month-end cumulative Monthly Rate of Return without such cumulative Monthly Rate of Return being equaled or exceeded as of a subsequent month-end.  For example, if the Monthly Rate of Return was (1)% in each of January and February, 1% in March and (2)% in April, the Peak-to-Valley Drawdown would still be continuing at the end of April in the amount of approximately (3)%, whereas if the Monthly Rate of Return had been approximately 3% in March, the Peak-to-Valley Drawdown would have ended as of the end of February at approximately the (2)% level.

(4) Monthly Rate of Return is the net performance of the Partnership during the month of determination (including interest income and after all expenses have been accrued or paid) divided by the total equity of the Partnership as of the beginning of such month.

13

Item 7:             Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

General

Sunrise has been the Partnership’s sole Advisor since July 1, 1998.  Sunrise is a trend-following trader, whose program does not attempt to predict price movements.  Sunrise has generally not relied on using fundamental economic supply or demand analyses nor macroeconomic assessments of the relative strengths of different national economies or economic sectors.  Instead, its program applies proprietary models to analyze past market data, and from this data attempts to determine whether market prices are trending.  As a technical trader, Sunrise bases its strategies on the theory that market prices reflect the collective judgment of numerous market participants and are, accordingly, an efficient indication of market movements.  However, there are frequent periods during which fundamental factors external to the market dominate prices.

If Sunrise’s models identify a trend, it signals positions, which follow the trend.  When these models identify the trend as having ended or reversed, these positions are either closed out or reversed.  Due to their trend-following character, Sunrise’s program does not predict either the commencement or the end of a price movement.  Rather, its objective is to identify a trend early enough to profit from it and detect its end or reversal in time to close out the Partnership’s positions while retaining most of the profits made from following the trend.

There are so many influences on the markets that the same general type of economic event may lead to a price trend in some cases but not in others.  The analysis is further complicated by the fact that the programs are designed to recognize only certain types of trends and to apply only certain criteria of when a trend has begun.  Consequently, even though significant price trends may occur, if these trends are not comprised of the type of intra-period price movements, which its program is designed to identify, Sunrise may miss the trend altogether.

Performance Summary

This performance summary is an outline description of how the Partnership performed in the past, not necessarily any indication of how it will perform in the future.  In addition, the general causes to which certain price movements are attributed may or may not in fact have caused such movements, but simply occurred at or about the same time.

Sunrise is unlikely to be profitable in markets in which such trends do not occur.  Static or erratic prices are likely to result in losses.  Similarly, unexpected events (for example, a political upheaval, natural disaster or governmental intervention) can lead to major short-term losses, as well as gains.

While there can be no assurance that Sunrise will be profitable under any given market condition, markets in which substantial and sustained price movements occur typically offer the best profit potential for the Partnership.

2007

	Total Trading
	Profit (Loss)
Energy	$	12,315,951
Currencies	7,513,761
Agricultural Commodities	3,750,546
Interest Rates	2,846,258
Stock Indices	(7,861,021		)
Metals	(6,673,210		)
	$	11,892,285

14

The Partnership posted overall gains for the year with the energy, currency, agriculture, and interest rate sectors posted profits while the stock indices and metal sectors sustained losses.

The energy sector posted profits for the Partnership. The year began with profits posted to the Partnership due to the United States crude futures falling to a twenty month low. Declining energy prices reached profit target levels resulting in a partial liquidation of the Partnership’s short energy positions. Rising inventories and warm weather were the primary drivers of the downward move. Despite initial weakness, the oil complex moved upward beginning mid-quarter and remained volatile with crude oil reaching a two-month high when the price rose above $60.00 a barrel. This move contributed heavily to the sector losses suffered by the Partnership’s short energy positions. Crude oil initially weakened and then rallied due to uncertainty over the hostage situation between the United Kingdom and Iran. Due to the volatility of the markets trading was difficult and relatively flat throughout the second quarter. The third quarter was profitable for the Partnership due to oil prices moving to record highs. The cut in interest rates, rising energy demands and forecasts for continued declines in U.S. inventories were among the major factors behind the rally. The year ended as prices continued to move higher. Crude oil approached $100.00 per barrel after the United States crude inventories fell more than expected. News of the assassination of the former Pakistani Prime Minister also contributed to the rise.

The currency sector posted profits for the Partnership. There were gains at the beginning of the year due to long positions in the British pound against the Swiss franc, the Euro and the Japanese yen. The British pound continued to strengthen against most major currencies due to rising United Kingdom interest rates reaching a two year high against the Euro and an eight year high against the Japanese yen. Profits continued to be posted through the second quarter as the U. S. dollar dropped to an all time low against the Euro and hit multiyear lows against other major and minor currencies. Sentiment towards the U.S. dollar remained negative in reaction to the disappointing United States economic data. Therefore, long positions in the Euro, British pound, Australian dollar, and New Zealand dollar generated solid gains against the U.S. dollar. Volatility and uncertainty returned to the currency market at the beginning of the third quarter as declines in global equity markets prompted position liquidation in the currency sector. Sunrise Expanded Diversified Program (“SEDP”) short positions in the Japanese yen suffered losses when the currency moved higher against its major counterparts. Losses continued to be posted to the Partnership during the mid third quarter in reaction to developments in the global financial system as the Japanese yen rallied while the British pound, Euro, Australian dollar and the New Zealand dollar weakened sharply as investors reduced their exposure to high yielding carry trades. As a result, SEDP liquidated a large portion of its short Japanese yen crosses and a large portion of its long positions in minor currencies. The U.S. dollar hit a series of new record lows against the Euro after the Federal Reserve cut its short-term lending rate by half point on September 18, 2007. The interest rate adjustment was a result of developments in the financial markets. It was negative for the U.S. dollar, with an outlook for less favorable interest rate differentials. Higher yielding currencies, like the Euro, Australian dollar, and the New Zealand dollar, showed gains after the Federal Reserves announcement. The trend of the lower U.S dollar and stronger commodity prices enabled SEDP to post profits for the Partnership at the end of the third quarter. The year ended with the British pound trading very close to all-time lows versus the Euro, which made SEDP’s short positions in the British pound versus the Euro the most profitable for the currency sector.

The agriculture sector posted profits for the Partnership. Trading in sugar was profitable at the beginning of the year as prices continued to decline. Soybeans and soybean meal futures rallied due to new contract highs on the possibility of planting and weather problems. However, the first quarter ended with losses posted to the Partnership due to weakened commodities prices causing the Partnership to exit most of SEDP’s long positions. Soybeans, wheat and cotton soared at the beginning of the second quarter due to the acreage and stock reports as well as weather forecasts. However, this could not offset the losses incurred mid through the end of the second quarter as price action in agricultural commodities remained very choppy. Wheat generated profits for the Partnership third quarter as the market climbed to an all-time high due to global production problems, a pre-existing tight inventory, and technical strength.  Grains continued to rally at the end of the third quarter mainly due to demand from the growing economies of Asia and Latin America posting profits for the Partnership. Profits continued to be posted for the Partnership as the year ended in response to a growing global demand.

15

The interest rate sector posted profits for the Partnership. Performance in the interest rate markets were mixed at the beginning of the year due to yields rising in most major markets, except Japan with moderate profits being generated in European interest rates futures. Losses were also incurred at the end of the first quarter as investors fled to safer alternatives and drove the market higher, against the Partnership’s short positions. Performance in the interest rate markets were mixed at the beginning of the second quarter due to domestic interest rate futures posting losses as the United States Federal Reserve was still on hold since last summer regarding interest rate adjustments. A number of equity markets reached new historic highs during the second quarter. In reaction to continued global expansion and strong economic growth, the European Central Bank raised interest rates to curb inflationary pressures resulting in the price of European debt instruments to move down, in favor of the SEDP’s short positions. The trends of rising stocks and interest rates switched sharply at the beginning of the third quarter forcing SEDP out of some profitable positions. The interest rate market rallied as investors moved into the traditional safety of government bonds, which generated losses for SEDP. Trading in interest rate futures also produced losses mid-quarter as investors moved from stocks to less risky government securities and pushed prices higher against the against SEDP’s short positions. These short positions were quickly liquidated and long positions were initiated for some shorter-term systems. The third quarter ended with interest rate sector posting profits to the Partnership as prices moved higher in favor of SEDP’s long positions. The interest rate sector faced a volatile market producing losses in December. Treasury prices moved lower during the first half of December 2007 and finished the year higher, ultimately supported by economic data.

The metals sector posted losses for the Partnership. Due to the volatility of the markets trading was difficult at the beginning of the year. There were no positions in the metal markets due to a lack of trends and/or unacceptable volatility which continued through the second quarter. Base and precious metals posted losses as prices declined across the board. Weakness in metals was a reflection of rising inventories which triggered heavy position liquidation resulting in losses being posted to the Partnership.  Profits were posted to the Partnership at the beginning of the third quarter in spite of the volatile markets and a difficult trading environment. Global growth remained strong as demand for commodities that are priced in dollars grew as gold prices moved higher posting solid profits. Gold extended its upward trend and traded above $800.00 an ounce in at the beginning of the fourth quarter. The upward trend in gold continued at the end of the year as strong demand helped drive prices higher. Industrial metals moved in favor of SEDP’s short positions which generated profits for the Partnership as the year ended.

Stock indices posted losses for the Partnership. Equity markets performed well at beginning of the year due to soft inflation and solid economic growth creating a positive environment for equities as long trades in both domestic and foreign stock indices recorded profits. However, mid-quarter generated losses due to most major stock indices had been at their long-term high and the Partnership had to liquidate a small portion of its long position on profit targets and continued to decline to the end of the first quarter. The beginning of the second quarter trading was profitable in the global stock market indices as favorable reports on economic growth abroad and corporate profits helped drive stock markets into record territory. The market experienced sharp up and down moves as the second quarter ended producing losses for the Partnership that were offset by gains from foreign stock index futures. The steepest losses were recorded at the beginning of the third quarter in global stock indices as stock prices fell sharply just days after setting record highs. Various pieces of unfavorable economic news sent the stock market down: concerns about the state of the U.S. credit and housing markets, corporate borrowing and mixed corporate results. Losses continued to be posted to the Partnership through the end of the third quarter due to dramatic price reversals as well as major position adjustments in the financial sector around the world. Developments in the credit markets and worries about the financial system negatively impacted the stock market and the Partnership recorded losses as the market suffered a major price correction as the year ended.

16

2006

	Total Trading
	Profit (Loss)
Stock Indices	$	8,321,295
Metals	13,145,842
Interest Rates	6,848,350
Energy	470,071
Agricultural Commodities	(1,879,496		)
Currencies	5,369,824
	$	32,275,886

The Partnership’s performance was an overall gain in 2006 with metals, stock indices, interest rates, currencies and energy posting gains while agriculture posted losses.

The metals sector produced gains for the Partnership. The year began with both precious and base metals continuing to be supported by strong supply-demand fundamentals. Concerns about the mining industry’s ability to meet growing demand, coupled with inflation and geopolitical concerns continued to drive prices higher. Gold, which is considered an indicator of inflation, rose to a 25-year high. Silver, which followed other precious and industrial metals, was trading at historically high levels, hitting a 22-year high. Growing demand for industrial metals in Asian economies seemed to be the main source of price support for the entire metals sector.  During the second quarter, the metals complex rallied to historically high levels, supported by a strong demand and tight global supplies. The rally attracted more speculative commodity interest, which further intensified the buying momentum. Trading was difficult throughout the third quarter due to the volatility of the markets. The year ended with the metals sector maintaining the profits it gained throughout the year.

The stock indices sector produced gains for the Partnership. Stock indices were profitable through the whole first quarter. During the second quarter, prices fell in May 2006 reflecting fears that inflation and rising interest rates might hurt corporate profits. Late in the quarter, prices moved higher after the U.S. Federal Reserve’s quarter-point rate hike. The stock market reacted to the statement that accompanied the U.S. Federal Reserve’s decision as the Federal Reserve toned down its warning about further rate increases. During the third quarter, the DAX, Germany’s benchmark stock index, was near a three-year high and the Nikkei 225 Stock Index reached a new four-year high. The year ended with several European and Japanese, as well as some domestic stock markets rising to new record highs.

The interest rates sector produced gains for the Partnership. The year started with year strong economic growth in the U.S. and abroad prompting central banks to raise interest rates.  The purpose of the economic tightening policy is to control the inflationary trend that tends to accompany economic growth. Mid-year global bond prices declined in anticipation of further interest rate increases. Strong economic data and growing inflation worries pushed yields to multi-year highs. Uncertainty about the U.S. Federal Reserve’s position on interest rate increases contributed towards keeping the markets volatile and choppy. A quarter-point interest rate hike at the end of June brought the short-term interest rates to 5.25 %. During the third quarter, the U.S. Federal Reserve decided not to increase interest rates for the first time in two years. The year ended with inflation fears decreasing and short term interest rates remaining unchanged for the third consecutive month with the market remained range bound.

The currency sector produced gains for the Partnership. The beginning of year was characterized by choppy, non-directional patterns making it difficult to identify trends. The U.S. dollar weakened against other major currencies. Mid-year the U.S. dollar came under pressure from several fronts and moved lower against other major currencies. Comments from the group of seven industrialized nations that addressed global imbalances and called for more currency flexibility caused the U.S. dollar to fall.  The U.S. dollar weakened further when the U.S. Federal Reserve signaled it might pause in its interest tightening cycle. The British pound outperformed the other major

17

currencies and became the largest contributor to the Partnership’s positive performance.  The U.S. dollar advanced against most major and minor currencies, due largely to speculation over interest rates.  Another factor in the U.S. dollar’s rise was weakness in its counterparts, especially the Japanese yen, the New Zealand dollar and the African rand. At the beginning of the third quarter, there were no gains due to concerns about lower growth and higher inflation. The U.S. currency reversed direction in reaction to soft economic data and declined against most major currencies. The British pound was under pressure at the end of the quarter in reaction to unfavorable economic reports. At the beginning of the fourth quarter, the U.S. dollar moved in relatively narrow ranges; it rose against other major currencies in early October 2006 only to reverse course and weaken in the second half of the month. Mid quarter, the British pound took center stage, rising to a 14-year high versus the U.S. dollar and generated significant profits for the Partnership’s long positions. The year ended with the U.S dollar higher against most major currencies.

The energy sector produced gains for the Partnership. At the beginning of the year, the energy sector posted a small profit for the Partnership. Mid-year crude oil prices moved up and reached an exchange-record level of $75.35 per barrel as concerns about tight summer gasoline supplies and tensions over Iran’s nuclear program remained high. During the third quarter, crude oil prices topped at $79 a barrel as a result of the current conflict in the Middle East and concern that conflict might spread to other countries, including the threat to oil exports from the Persian Gulf. Crude oil prices fell below $60 a barrel at the end of the quarter down 21% from its high at the beginning of the quarter. The factors behind the dramatic price decline included growing inventories and a slowdown in global economic growth. The year ended as energy prices weakened in reaction to unseasonably warm weather in the Northeastern U.S. and rising inventories of gasoline and other products. Falling oil prices triggered several profit-taking signals for the Partnership.

The agriculture sector produced losses for the Partnership. The beginning of the year saw sugar as the main single market contributor to positive returns reaching the highest price level since 1995. Mid-year favorable weather forecasts for the Midwest put pressure on grain futures and caused the Partnership to liquidate long corn and wheat positions. The third quarter ended with the sector posting losses due to increased volatility. The year ended with corn prices rising to new highs on expectations of strong ethanol demand and wheat prices moving higher due to reports of tight supplies.

2005

	Total Trading
	Profit (Loss)
Stock Indices	$	13,907,052
Metals	8,710,419
Interest Rates	8,153,645
Energy	(113,377		)
Agricultural Commodities	(1,958,031		)
Currencies	(49,881,310		)
	$	(21,181,602	)

The Partnership experienced an overall loss for the year. Stock indices, metals sector and interest rates were profitable for the Partnership while the energy sector, agricultural commodities, and currencies sustained losses.

Stock indices posted the highest profit for the Partnership. There were little gains in the first half of the year due to such a volatile trading environment. Stock indices outperformed the other sectors in the Partnership in the third quarter. In particular, the DAX, German’s benchmark stock index was near a three-year high and the Nikkei 225 Stock Index reached a new four-year high. The Partnership took advantage of its trading profits by partially liquidating its long positions at profit target levels. The year ended with foreign stock indices continuing to be profitable, moving to new highs. This caused an exit in the remaining long Nikkei 225 position to lock in profit targets.

18

The metals sector was profitable for the Partnership. The year began with trend reversals and severe volatility causing losses in precious and base metals only to regain their bullish momentum as the year progressed with aluminum and copper prices strengthening due to a tighter supply-demand situation. The gold futures appreciated significantly in September 2005 due to the increased demand for gold which is a direct correlation to rising inflation expectations. Strong demand combined with historically low inventories and inflation concerns drove the prices to new highs in November 2005. Therefore, profitable metals positions (copper, aluminum) were partially liquidated after reaching profit targets. The year ended with gold, which is usually sensitive to the U.S. dollar and tends to move in the opposite direction, reaching new contract highs as the U.S. dollar declined in value. Silver and aluminum also posted solid profits.

The interest rate sector also posted gains for the Partnership. The year began with both domestic and foreign interest rate futures recording record profits as yields on long-term debt instruments continued to fall. However, the trend reversed early in the year generating profits on short Eurodollar positions only to reverse again at the end of the June 2005. France’s decision not to ratify a new European constitution seemed to contribute to the rally in interest rate futures. Favorable economic news and expectations that the Federal Reserve might stop raising interest rates in the summer may also explain the strength in bond prices. On July 1, 2005, the U.S. Federal Reserve raised the Federal funds rate by another 0.25%, which represented the ninth increase of that size since the central bank began to tighten credit in June 2004 and caused the price of underlying debt instruments to move down against long positions. Gains were generated in short-term interest rate futures with the Partnership having a short position in the Eurodollar.  The year ended with losses as prices moved against the Partnership’s short positions. The Partnership experienced an inversion of the yield curve as long-term yields dropped below the level of short-term yields. The strong demand of  U.S. Treasury bonds and notes may have been driving long-term yields lower.

The energy sector posted losses for the Partnership. Trading in this sector was in the third quarter only. Crude oil rallied to levels above $70.00 per barrel but dropped sharply after the U.S. government decided to release some oil from energy stockpiles, while the Partnership’s long crude oil positions recorded profits. Prices remained at levels not seen for 15 years as the market struggled for direction after refinery and production shutdowns in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

The agricultural sector posted losses for the Partnership due to the volatility of the trading market. Profits from sugar reached an 11 year high and became one of the best performing commodities in 2005. However, profits from sugar could not offset losses sustained from other commodities.

The currency sector was the least profitable for the Partnership.  The year was characterized by a strong U.S. dollar even in light of higher energy prices and Hurricane Katrina’s effects.  At the beginning of the year, the U.S. dollar gained support by improved U.S. economic data and moved higher against most major and minor currencies. The rising U.S. dollar triggered exit signals for short U.S. dollar positions which resulted in losses. The trend of a stronger U.S. dollar continued through the middle part of the year as key economic reports indicated the United States is growing faster than other developed countries coupled with higher interest rates in the U.S. In the beginning of July 2005, there was an approximate 2% revaluation of the Chinese yuan against the U.S. dollar which led to a short rally in several Asian currencies including the Japanese yen. Positive momentum for the U.S. dollar came at the end of the year which resulted from favorable interest rate differentials. The U.S. interest rates had climbed by 300 basis points over the past two years, while European and Japanese rates have remained stagnant.

19

Variables Affecting Performance

The principal variables that determine the net performance of the Partnership are gross profitability from the Partnership’s trading activities and interest income.

During all periods set forth above “Selected Financial Data”, the interest rates in many countries were at unusually low levels.  The low interest rates in the United States (although higher than in many other countries) negatively impacted revenues because interest income is typically a major component of the Partnership’s profitability.  In addition, low interest rates are frequently associated with reduced fixed income market volatility, and in static markets the Partnership’s profit potential generally tends to be diminished.  On the other hand, during periods of higher interest rates, the relative attractiveness of a high risk investment such as the Partnership may be reduced as compared to high yielding and much lower risk fixed-income investments.

The Partnership’s Brokerage Commissions and Administrative Fees are a constant percentage of the Partnership costs (other than the insignificant currency trading costs which are not based on a percentage of the Partnership’s assets allocated to trading or total) are the Profit Shares payable to the Advisor based on the new Trading Profits generated by the Partnership excluding interest and after reduction for a portion of the Brokerage Commissions.

Unlike many investment fields, there is no meaningful distinction in the operation of the Partnership between realized and unrealized profits.  Most of the contracts traded by the Partnership are highly liquid and can be closed out at any time.

Except in unusual circumstances, factors—regulatory approvals, cost of goods sold, employee relations and the like—which often materially affect an operating business have no material impact on the Partnership.

Liquidity; Capital Resources

The Partnership borrows only to a limited extent and only on a strictly short-term basis in order to finance losses on non-U.S. dollar denominated trading positions pending the conversion of the Partnership’s U.S. dollar deposits. These borrowings are at a prevailing short-term rate in the relevant currency.

Substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are held in cash. The Net Asset Value of the Partnership’s cash is not affected by inflation. However, changes in interest rates could cause periods of strong up or down price trends, during which the Partnership’s profit potential generally increases. Inflation in commodity prices could also generate price movements, which the strategies might successfully follow.

Because substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are held in cash, the Partnership should be able to close out any or all of its open trading positions and liquidate any or all of its securities holdings quickly and at market prices, except in very unusual circumstances. This permits the Advisor to limit losses as well as reduce market exposure on short notice should its strategies indicate doing so. In addition, because there is a readily available market value for the Partnership’s positions and assets, the Partnership’s monthly Net Asset Value calculations are precise, and investors need only wait ten business days to receive the full redemption proceeds of their Units.

(The Partnership has no applicable off-balance sheet arrangements and tabular disclosure or contractual obligations of the type described in Items 3.03(a)(4) and 3.03(a)(5) of Regulation S-K)

20

Item 7A: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Introduction

The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes and all or substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss.  Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership’s main line of business.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of the Partnership’s open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Partnership’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnership’s open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Partnership, under the direction of Sunrise, rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets.  Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership’s past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership’s speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership’s experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the quantifications included in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership’s losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership’s attempts to manage its market risk.

Quantifying The Partnership’s Trading Value At Risk

Quantitative Forward-Looking Statements

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statement” within the meaning of the safe harbor form civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27Aof the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).  All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact.

The Partnership’s risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the Advisor is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk.  Due to the Partnership’s mark-to-market accounting, any loss in the fair value of the Partnership’s open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s earnings (realized or unrealized) and cash flow (at least in the case of exchange-traded contracts in which profits and losses on open positions are settled daily through variation margin).

Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Partnership as the measure of its Value at Risk.  Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum loss in the fair value of any given contract incurred in 95%-99% of the one-day time periods included in the historical sample (generally approximately one year) researched for purposes of establishing margin levels.  The maintenance margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation.

21

In the case of market sensitive instruments which are not exchange-traded (almost exclusively currencies in the case of the Partnership), the margin requirements for the equivalent futures positions have been used as Value at Risk.  In those rare cases in which a futures-equivalent margin is not available, dealers’ margins have been used.

100% positive correlation in the different positions held in each market risk category has been assumed.  Consequently, the margin requirements applicable to the open contracts have been aggregated to determine each trading category’s aggregate Value at Risk.  The diversification effects resulting from the fact that the Partnership’s positions are rarely, if ever, 100% positively correlated have not been reflected.

The Partnership’s Trading Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors

The following table indicates the average, highest and lowest trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category for the fiscal years. During the fiscal year 2007, the Partnership’s average capitalization was $288,689,351. During the fiscal year 2006, the Partnership’s average capitalization was $354,244,209.

	December 31, 2007
	Average		% of Average		Highest Value		Lowest Value
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization		At Risk		At Risk
Currencies	$	6,528,563	2.26	%	$	78,342,752		$	1,273,153
Metals	965,803		0.33	%	11,589,631		—
Stock Indices	3,084,338		1.07	%	37,012,055		520,573
Interest Rates	22,335,459		7.74	%	268,025,512		3,455,553
Energy	1,452,389		0.50	%	17,428,673		—
Agricultural Commodities	720,811		0.25	%	8,649,733		27,165
TOTAL	$	35,087,363	12.15	%	$	421,048,356		$	5,276,444

	December 31, 2006
	Average		% of Average		Highest Value		Lowest Value
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization		At Risk		At Risk
Currencies	$	1,887,758	0.53	%	$	6,222,410	$	197,905
Metals	183,195		0.05	%	458,773		—
Stock Indices	1,534,109		0.43	%	5,526,258		—
Interest Rates	26,922,172		7.60	%	33,894,080		13,349,857
Energy	589,740		0.17	%	2,618,734		—
Agricultural Commodities	218,024		0.06	%	1,475,549		—
TOTAL	$	31,334,998	8.85	%	$	50,195,804	$	13,547,762

22

Material Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership is typically many times the applicable maintenance margin requirement (maintenance margin requirements generally ranging between approximately 1% and 10% of contract face value) as well as many times the capitalization of the Partnership.  The magnitude of the Partnership’s open positions creates a “risk of ruin” not typically found in most other investment vehicles.  Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions — unusual, but historically recurring from time to time — could cause the Partnership to incur severe losses over a short period of time.   The foregoing Value at Risk table — as well as the past performance of the Partnership — gives no indication of this “risk of ruin.”

Non-Trading Risk

Foreign Currency Balances; Cash on Deposit with MLPF&S

The Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as the market risk they represent) are immaterial.

The Partnership also has non-trading market risk on the approximately 90%-95% of its assets which are held in cash at MLPF&S. The value of this cash is not interest rate sensitive, but there is cash flow risk in that if interest rates decline so will the cash flow generated on these monies. This cash flow risk is immaterial.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures

The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk exposures — except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its primary market risk exposures — constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Partnership’s primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by MLAI and Sunrise for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, and an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Partnership. There can be no assurance that the Partnership’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long-term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of the time value of their investment in the Partnership.

The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Partnership as of December 31, 2007, by market sector.

Interest Rates.

Interest rate risk is the principal market exposure of the Partnership.  Interest rate movements directly affect the price of derivative sovereign bond positions held by the Partnership and indirectly the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between countries materially impact the Partnership’s profitability. The Partnership’s primary interest rate exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the United States and the other G-7 countries.  However, the Partnership also takes positions in the government debt of smaller nations e.g., Australia. The Partnership anticipates that G-7 interest rates will remain the primary market exposure of the Partnership for the foreseeable future.

Currencies.

The Partnership trades in a number of currencies. However, the Partnership’s major exposures have typically been in the U.S. dollar/Japanese yen, U.S. dollar/Euro, U.S dollar/Australian dollar and U.S. dollar/Swiss franc positions. The Partnership does not anticipate that the risk profile of the Partnership’s currency sector will change significantly in the future. The currency trading Value at Risk figure includes foreign margin amounts converted into U.S. dollars with an incremental adjustment to reflect the exchange rate risk of maintaining Value at Risk in a functional currency other than U.S. dollars.

23

Stock Indices.

The Partnership’s primary equity exposure is to S&P 500, Nikkei and German DAX equity index price movements. The Partnership is primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the major U.S., European and Asian indices.

Metals.

The Partnership’s metals market exposure is to fluctuations in both the price of precious and non-precious metals.

Agricultural Commodities

The Partnership’s primary agricultural commodities exposure is to agricultural price movements which are often directly affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions. Soybeans, grains, cotton and sugar accounted for the substantial bulk of the Partnership’s agricultural commodities exposure as of December 31, 2007. However, it is anticipated that Sunrise will maintain an emphasis on cotton, grains and sugar, in which the Partnership has historically taken its largest positions.

Energy.

The Partnership’s primary energy market exposure is to natural gas and crude oil price movements, often resulting from political developments in the Middle East. Oil prices can be volatile and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be experienced in this market.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure

The following were the only non-trading risk exposures of the Partnership as of December 31, 2007.

Foreign Currency Balances.

The Partnership’s primary foreign currency balances are in Japanese yen, AUD, CAD, CHF and Euros.

U.S. Dollar Cash Balance.

The Partnership holds U.S. dollars only in cash at MLPF&S. The Partnership has immaterial cash flow interest rate risk on its cash on deposit with MLPF&S in that declining interest rates would cause the income from such cash to decline.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure

Trading Risk

MLAI has procedures in place intended to control market risk, although there can be no assurance that they will, in fact, succeed in doing so. These procedures focus primarily on monitoring the trading of the Advisor, calculating the Net Asset Value of the Partnership account managed by the Advisor as of the close of business on each day and reviewing outstanding positions for over-concentrations. While MLAI does not itself intervene in the markets to hedge or diversify the Partnership’s market exposure, MLAI may urge the Advisor to reallocate positions in an attempt to avoid over-concentrations.  However, such interventions are unusual. Sunrise applies its own risk management policies to its trading.

Sunrise Risk Management

Sunrise attempts to control risk through the utilization of proprietary risk management techniques, which are applied at all stages of the trading process. These techniques are designed to control all aspects of portfolio, market, and execution risk, with the stated goal of maintaining Sunrise’s historical rates of returns without increased volatility.

The basis for Sunrise’s risk management system is its scientific approach and historical research. This process attempts to measure the correlation and performance characteristics associated with various weightings assigned to different markets and sectors. Sunrise allocates equity risk to each market and market sector in an effort to minimize the possibility that any one market or sector has a disproportionate influence on the portfolio. Overall, portfolio exposure, drawdown and recovery periods are carefully studied.

24

Sunrise uses filters that attempt to avoid taking trades with poor risk/reward characteristics. In addition, once a trade is taken, an array of exit strategies are employed that attempt to protect open profits while exiting positions that fail to trend in the expected direction. Initial money stops are strictly followed and factors that would make it difficult to execute trades, such as reduced liquidity or extreme market developments, are also incorporated in the trading decision and risk management processes.

Other risk factors such as foreign currency risk when trading in non-U.S. markets, custodian risk, and counterparty risk when trading in the over-the counter markets are taken into account and play an important part of Sunrise’s overall risk management process. Sunrise uses only counterparties and brokers to execute trades that it and the market generally perceive as creditworthy. The majority of trades are done with institutions with which Sunrise has long-term relationships.

Non-Trading Risk

The Partnership controls the non-trading exchange rate risk by regularly converting foreign balances back into U.S. dollars at least once per week, and more frequently if a particular foreign currency balance becomes unusually high.

The Partnership has cash flow interest rate risk on its cash on deposit with MLPF&S in that declining interest rates would cause the income from such cash to decline. However, a certain amount of cash or cash equivalents must be held by the Partnership in order to facilitate margin payments and pay expenses and redemptions. MLAI does not take any steps to limit the cash flow risk on its cash held on deposit at MLPF&S.

Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Selected Quarterly Financial Data

ML Select Futures I  L.P.

Net Income by Quarter

Eight Quarters through December 31, 2007 

		Fourth		Third			Second		First			Fourth		Third			Second		First
		Quarter		Quarter			Quarter		Quarter			Quarter		Quarter			Quarter		Quarter
	Totals	2007		2007			2007		2007			2006		2006			2006		2006
Total Income (Loss)		$	34,530,537	$	(48,718,656	)	$	46,724,564	$	(7,396,010	)	$	26,136,696	$	(15,744,070	)	$	20,068,698	$	19,002,534
Total Expenses		4,217,901		(1,394,041		)	10,435,600		4,756,803			4,910,876		4,436,689			6,048,528		5,678,944
Net Income (Loss)		$	30,312,636	$	(47,324,615	)	$	36,288,964	$	(12,152,813	)	$	21,225,820	$	(20,180,759	)	$	14,020,170	$	13,323,590
Weighted average units		1,045,515		1,211,846			1,274,203		1,327,037			1,408,746		1,480,389			1,552,158		1,710,600
Net Income (Loss) per weighted average Unit		$	28.99	$	(39.05	)	$	28.48	$	(9.16	)	$	15.07	$	(13.63	)	$	9.03	$	7.79

The financial statements required by this Item are included in Exhibit 13.01.

The supplementary financial information (“information about oil and gas producing activities”) specified by Item 302(b) of Regulation S-K is not applicable.

Item 9: Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There were no changes in or disagreements with the independent registered public accounting firm on accounting and financial disclosure.

Item 9A(T): Controls and Procedures

MLAI’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, on behalf of the Partnership, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures with respect to the Partnership as of and for the year which ended December 31, 2007, and, based on its evaluation, has concluded that these

25

disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Additionally, there were no significant changes in the Partnership’s internal controls over financial reporting which materially affect such internal control.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act ) occurred during the year ended December 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control, over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

The Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of MLAI’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, on behalf of the Partnership and is effected by management, other personnel and service providers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and included those policy and procedures that:

·Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership.

·Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that  receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Partnership; and

·Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting can only provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in condition, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Partnership’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as December 31, 2007.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework”.

Based on its assessment the Partnership’s management concluded that at December 31, 2007, the Partnership’s internal control over financial report was effective.

Item 9B:  Other Information

Not Applicable.

26

PART III

Item 10: Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

10(a) and 10(b)      Identification of Directors and Executive Officers:

As a limited partnership, the Partnership has no officers or directors and is managed by MLAI. Trading decisions are made by Sunrise on behalf of the Partnership.

The managers and executive officers of MLAI and their respective business backgrounds are as follows:

Paul Morton	Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
Barbra E. Kocsis	Chief Financial Officer
Steven B. Olgin	Vice President and Manager
Thomas W. Lee	Vice President and Manager
Shawn T. Wells	Vice President

Paul Morton is the Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of MLAI, and also serves as the COO for the Global Investment and Insurance Solutions (GIIS) group for Merrill Lynch.  As COO of GIIS, Mr. Morton leads the market investments business within the group, which includes secondary equity, debt, listed options, futures and FX for Merrill Lynch’s Global Wealth Management division.  Prior to serving as COO of GIIS, Mr. Morton worked in the equity and debt trading management of Merrill Lynch. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch in 1996, Mr. Morton worked in the equity derivatives at Paine Webber.  From 1988-1993, Mr. Morton served as an officer in the US Army for five years.  Mr. Morton holds a BS (Aerospace Engineering) from the United States Military Academy at West Point (1988) and a MBA (Finance) from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania (1995).

Barbra E. Kocsis is the Chief Financial Officer of MLAI. She is also a Director within the Merrill Lynch Global Private Client Global Infrastructure Solutions group. Prior to that, she was the Fund Controller of MLAI. Before coming to MLAI, Ms. Kocsis held various accounting and tax positions at Derivatives Portfolio Management LLC from May 1992 until May 1999, at which time she held the position of accounting director. Prior to that, she was an associate at Coopers & Lybrand in both the audit and tax practices. She graduated cum laude from Monmouth College in 1988 with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration – Accounting and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Steven B. Olgin is a Vice President and a Manager of MLAI, is registered with NFA as a principal of MLAI and is a Managing Director of Merrill Lynch Global Private Client (“GPC”).  Before joining the Manager in 1994, Mr. Olgin was an associate of the law firm of Sidley & Austin, from 1986 until 1994.  Mr. Olgin graduated from The American University with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Arts in Economics, and received his Juris Doctor from The John Marshall Law School.  Mr. Olgin was a member of the Managed Funds Association’s Government Relations Committee and has served as an arbitrator for NFA.

Thomas W. Lee is a Managing Director in Merrill Lynch’s Market Investments and Origination Group, responsible for Global Private Client’s equity and debt new issue businesses, and is a Vice President and Manager of MLAI, and his registration as a principal of MLAI is pending with NFA.  Prior to joining Merrill Lynch in 1998, Mr. Lee was a corporate securities attorney at the law firm of Brown & Wood.  Mr. Lee received his J.D. from Emory University School of Law and a B.S. from Cornell University.

Shawn Wells is a Vice President of MLAI and the General Counsel, a position he has held since October 2005.  Prior to that time, Mr. Wells served as Senior Associate General Counsel at Franklin Templeton Investments, serving as Chief Counsel of the firm’s International and Alternative Strategies divisions from October 1996 to December 1997 and again from September 1998 to October 2005.  Mr. Wells is a Certified Public

27

Accountant, and received a BBA in Finance and Accounting from the University of Texas at Austin, and his JD from Southern Methodist University, where he was an editor of the SMU Law Review.

As of December 31, 2007, the principals of MLAI had no investment in the Partnership, and MLAI’s general partner interest in the Partnership was valued at $3,483,352.

MLAI acts as the sponsor, general partner or manager to ten public futures funds whose units of limited partner or member interests are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: ML Trend-Following Futures Fund L.P., ML Systematic Momentum Futures Access, LLC, ML Appleton FuturesAccess LLC, ML Aspect FuturesAccess LLC, ML Winton FuturesAccess LLC, ML Cornerstone FuturesAccess LLC, ML APM Global Futures Access LLC; ML Chesapeake FuturesAccess, ML Transtrend DTP Enhanced FuturesAccess LLC and the Partnership. Because MLAI serves as the sponsor, general partner or manager of each of these funds, the officers and managers of MLAI effectively manage them as officers and directors of such funds.

(c)Identification of Certain Significant Employees:

None.

(d)Family Relationships:

None.

(e)Business Experience:

See Item 10(a) and (b) above.

(f)Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings:

None.

(g)Promoters and Control Persons:

Not applicable.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance:

Not applicable.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance:

Not applicable.

Code of Ethics:

MLAI and Merrill Lynch have adopted a code of ethics, as of the end of the period covered by this report, which applies to the Partnership’s (MLAI’s) principal executive officer and principal financial officer or persons performing similar functions on behalf of the Partnership.  A copy of the code of ethics is available to any person, without charge, upon request by calling 1-866-MER-ALTS.

Nominating Committee:

Not applicable. (Neither the Partnership nor MLAI has nominating committee.)

Audit Committee: Audit Committee Financial Expert:

Not applicable. (Neither the Partnership nor MLAI has an audit committee.  There are no listed

shares of the Partnership or MLAI.)

28

Item 11: Executive Compensation

The managers and officers of MLAI are remunerated by MLAI in their respective positions. The Partnership does not have any officers, managers or employees.  The Partnership pays Brokerage Commissions to an affiliate of MLAI and Administrative Fees to MLAI.  MLAI or its affiliates may also receive certain economic benefits from possession of the Partnership’s U.S. dollar assets.  The managers and officers receive no “other compensation” from the Partnership, and the managers receive no compensation for serving as managers of MLAI.  There are no compensation plans or arrangements relating to a change in control of either the Partnership or MLAI.

Item 12: Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

(a)Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners:

None.

(b)Security Ownership of Management:

As of December 31, 2007, MLAI owned 13,916 Unit-equivalent general partnership interests, which constituted 1.54% of the total Units outstanding, the principals of MLAI did not own any Units, and the Advisor did not own any Units.

(c)           Changes in Control:

None.

(d)Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans:

Not applicable.

Item 13: Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

(a)           Transactions between Merrill Lynch and the Partnership

All of the service providers to the Partnership, other than Sunrise, are affiliates of Merrill Lynch.  Merrill Lynch negotiated with Sunrise over the level of its advisory fees and Profit Shares.  However, none of the fees paid by the Partnership to any Merrill Lynch party were negotiated, and they are higher than would have been obtained in arms-length bargaining.

The Partnership pays MLPF&S substantial Brokerage Commissions and Administrative Fees as well as bid-ask spreads on forward currency trades.  The Partnership also pays MLPF&S interest on short-term loans extended by MLPF&S to cover losses on foreign currency positions.

Within the Merrill Lynch organization, MLAI is the beneficiary of the revenues received by different Merrill Lynch entities from the Partnership.  MLAI controls the management of the Partnership and serves as its promoter.  Although MLAI has not sold any assets, directly or indirectly, to the Partnership, MLAI makes substantial profits from the Partnership due to the foregoing revenues.

No loans have been, are or will be outstanding between MLAI or any of its principals and the Partnership.

29

MLAI pays substantial selling commissions and trailing commissions to MLPF&S for distributing the Units.  MLAI is ultimately paid back for these expenditures from the revenues it receives from the Partnership.

(b)Certain Business Relationships:

MLPF&S, an affiliate of MLAI, acts as the principal commodity broker for the Partnership.

In 2007, the Partnership expensed:  (i) Brokerage Commissions of $16,351,736 to MLPF&S, which included $3,528,037 in consulting fees earned by Sunrise; and (ii) Administrative Fees of $743,261 to MLAI.  In addition, MLAI and its affiliates may have derived certain economic benefits from possession of a portion of the Partnership’s assets, as well as from foreign exchange and EFP trading.

See Item 1(c), “Narrative Description of Business — Charges” and “— Description of Current Charges” for a discussion of other business dealings between MLAI affiliates and the Partnership.

(c)           Indebtedness of Management:

The Partnership is prohibited from making any loans, to management or otherwise.

Item 14: Principal Accountant Fees and Services

(a)Audit Fees

Aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with the audit of the Partnership’s financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $48,000 and $45,207.

(b)Audit-Related Fees

There were no other audit-related fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2007 or 2006 related to the Partnership.

(c)Tax Fees

Aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Deloitte Tax LLP in connection with the tax compliance, advice and preparation of the Partnership’s tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $72,000 for both years.

(d)All Other Fees

No fees were paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP nor Deloitte Tax LLP during the years ended December 31, 2007 or 2006 for any other professional services in relation to the Partnership.

Neither the Partnership nor MLAI has an audit committee to pre-approve principal accountant fees and services.  In lieu of an audit committee, the managers and the principal financial officer pre-approve all billings prior to the commencement of services.

30

PART IV

Item 15: Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

		Page:
1.	Financial Statements (found in Exhibit 13.01):
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	1
	Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2007 and 2006	2
	For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
	Statements of Operations	3
	Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital	4
	Financial Data Highlights for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	5
	Notes to Financial Statements	6-12

2.            Financial Statement Schedules:

Financial statement schedules not included in this Form 10-K have been omitted for the reason that they are not required or are not applicable or that equivalent information has been included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3.            Exhibits:

The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or are filed herewith to this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Designation	Description
3.01	Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Registrant.
Exhibit 3.01:	Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.01 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (File No. 000-50269) filed on April 30, 2003, on Form 10 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Registrant’s Registration Statement”).
3.02	ML Select Futures I L.P. Eleventh Amendment and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement.
Exhibit 3.02	Is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.02(a) contained in the Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 000-50269) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed on October 11, 2007.
10.01	Subscription Agreement
Exhibit 10.01:	Is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 contained in Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement
10.03	Customer Agreement between ML Select Futures I L.P. and Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.
Exhibit 10.03:	Is incorporated hereby by reference from Exhibit 10.03 contained in the Registrant’s Registration Statement.

31

10.04	Consulting Agreement between Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. and Sunrise Capital Partners, LLC.
Exhibit 10.04:	Is incorporated hereby by reference from Exhibit 10.04 contained in the Registrant’s Registration Statement.
10.05	Selling Agreement among ML Select Futures I L.P. Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc., Merrill Lynch Futures Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Sunrise Capital Partners.
Exhibit 10.05:	Is incorporated hereby by reference from Exhibit 10.05 contained in the Registrant’s Registration Statement.
13.01	2007 Annual Report and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Exhibit 13.01:	Is filed herewith.
31.01 and 31.02	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
Exhibit 31.01
and 31.02:	Are filed herewith.
32.01 and 32.02	Section 1350 Certifications
Exhibit 32.01
and 32.02:	Are filed herewith.

32

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ML SELECT FUTURES I L.P.

By: MERRILL LYNCH ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS GENERAL PARTNER

By:	/s/Paul Morton
Paul Morton
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed on March 31, 2008 by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Paul Morton	Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager	March 31, 2008
Paul Morton
/s/ Barbra E. Kocsis	Chief Financial Officer	March 31, 2008
Barbra E. Kocsis
/s/ Steven B. Olgin	Vice President and Manager	March 31, 2008
Steven B. Olgin
/s/ Thomas W. Lee	Vice President and Manager	March 31, 2008
Thomas W. Lee
/s/ Shawn T. Wells	Vice President	March 31, 2008
Shawn T. Wells

(Being the principal executive officer, the principal financial and accounting officer and a majority of the managers of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC)

MERRILL LYNCH ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS LLC
Sponsor of Registrant	March 31, 2008

By:	/s/ Paul Morton
Paul Morton
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)

ML SELECT FUTURES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

2007 FORM 10-K

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

	Exhibit
Exhibit 13.01	2007 Annual Report and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Exhibit 31.01	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
Exhibit 31.02	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
Exhibit 32.01	Section 1350 Certifications
Exhibit 32.02	Section 1350 Certifications

EX-13.01

Exhibit 13.01

ML SELECT FUTURES I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

Financial Statements for the years ended

December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

and Report of Independent Registered Public

Accounting Firm

ML Select Futures I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2007 and 2006	2
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	3
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	4
Financial Data Highlights for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005	5
Notes to Financial Statements	6-12

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of

  ML Select Futures I L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of ML Select Futures I L.P. (the “Partnership”), as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of operations and changes in partners’ capital and the financial data highlights for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007.  These financial statements and financial data highlights are the responsibility of the Partnership's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial data highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial data highlights are free of material misstatement.  The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial data highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ML Select Futures I L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the results of its operations, the changes in its partners’ capital, and its financial data highlights for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Princeton, New Jersey

March 31, 2008

ML SELECT FUTURES I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006

	2007		2006
ASSETS:
Equity in commodity futures trading accounts:
Cash (includes restricted cash of $26,426,863 for 2007 and $92,042,246 for 2006)	$	230,559,475	$	322,600,743
Net unrealized profit on open contracts	7,570,860		9,022,301
Accrued interest	625,818		1,378,976
Due from MLAI	17,001		—
TOTAL ASSETS	$	238,773,154	$	333,002,020
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
LIABILITIES:
Brokerage commissions payable	$	1,093,977	$	1,526,262
Profit Shares payable	538,379		—
Administrative and filing fees payable	70,559		90,193
Redemptions payable	11,315,876		5,212,995
Total liabilities	13,018,791		6,829,450
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL:
General Partner (13,916 Units and 14,878 Units)	3,483,352		3,607,393
Limited Partners (887,137 Units and 1,330,119 Units)	222,271,011		322,565,177
Total partners’ capital	225,754,363		326,172,570
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL	$	238,773,154	$	333,002,020
NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT
(Based on 901,053 and 1,344,997 Units outstanding; unlimited Units authorized)	$	250.55	$	242.51

See notes to financial statements.

2

ML SELECT FUTURES I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, 2006 AND 2005

	2007			2006			2005
TRADING PROFIT (LOSS):
Realized	$	13,343,726		$	37,752,945		$	(24,222,659	)
Change in unrealized	(1,451,441		)	(5,477,059		)	3,041,057
Total trading profit (loss)	11,892,285			32,275,886			(21,181,602		)
INVESTMENT INCOME:
Interest	13,248,150			17,187,972			15,719,664
EXPENSES:
Brokerage commissions	16,351,736			19,872,678			27,053,850
Profit Shares	671,266			49,055			—
Administrative and filing fees	993,261			1,153,304			1,479,720
Total expenses	18,016,263			21,075,037			28,533,570
NET INVESTMENT LOSS	(4,768,113		)	(3,887,065		)	(12,813,906		)
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	7,124,172		$	28,388,821		$	(33,995,508	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER UNIT:
Weighted average number of General Partner and Limited Partner Units outstanding	1,214,651			1,537,973			2,285,957
Net income (loss) per weighted average General Partner and Limited Partner Unit	$	5.87		$	18.46		$	(14.87	)

See notes to financial statements.

3

ML SELECT FUTURES I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, 2006 AND 2005

			General			Limited
	Units		Partner			Partners			Total
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL, DECEMBER 31, 2004	2,504,074		$	6,199,855		$	580,778,511		$	586,978,366
Subscriptions	5,494		—			1,181,237			1,181,237
Net loss	—		(270,858		)	(33,724,650		)	(33,995,508		)
Redemptions	(739,338	)	—			(157,334,957		)	(157,334,957		)
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL, DECEMBER 31, 2005	1,770,230		5,928,997			390,900,141			396,829,138
Subscriptions	21,575		—			5,048,863			5,048,863
Net income	—		302,107			28,086,714			28,388,821
Redemptions	(446,808	)	(2,623,711		)	(101,470,541		)	(104,094,252		)
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL, DECEMBER 31, 2006	1,344,997		3,607,393			322,565,177			326,172,570
Subscriptions	9,109		—			2,223,503			2,223,503
Net income	—		109,956			7,014,216			7,124,172
Redemptions	(453,053	)	(233,997		)	(109,531,885		)	(109,765,882		)
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL, DECEMBER 31, 2007	901,053		$	3,483,352		$	222,271,011		$	225,754,363

See notes to financial statements.

4

ML SELECT FUTURES I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

FINANCIAL DATA HIGHLIGHTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

The following per Unit data and ratios have been derived from information provided in the financial statements.

	2007			2006			2005
Per Unit Operating Performance:
Net asset value, beginning of year	$	242.51		$	224.17		$	234.41
Realized trading profit (loss)	15.47			24.28			(6.31		)
Change in unrealized	(3.46		)	(3.48		)	1.58
Interest income	10.77			11.23			6.98
Expenses (1)	(14.74		)	(13.69		)	(12.49		)
Net asset value, end of year	$	250.55		$	242.51		$	224.17
Total Return:
Total return	3.31		%	8.18		%	-4.37		%
Ratios to Average Partners’ Capital (1):
Expenses	6.24		%	5.95		%	5.88		%
Net investment loss	-1.65		%	-1.10		%	-2.64		%

(1) Includes the impact of brokerage commission expenses.

See notes to financial statements.

5

ML SELECT FUTURES I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization

ML Select Futures I L.P. (the “Partnership”) was organized under the Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act in August 1995 and commenced trading activities on April 16, 1996. The Partnership issues new units of limited partner interest (“Units”) at Net Asset Value as of the beginning of each calendar month. The Partnership engages in the speculative trading of futures, options on futures and forward contracts on a wide range of commodities. Sunrise Capital Partners, LLC (“Sunrise”) is the trading advisor of the Partnership. Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC (“MLAI”), is the general partner of the Partnership. MLAI is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”). Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“MLPF&S”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch, is the Partnership’s commodity broker.  MLAI has agreed to maintain a general partner’s interest of at least 1% of the total capital in the Partnership.  MLAI and each Limited Partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to their respective interests in it.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Commodity futures, options on futures and forward contract transactions are recorded on the trade date and open contracts are reflected in Net unrealized profit on open contracts in the Statements of Financial Condition as the difference between the original contract value and the market value (for those commodity interests for which market quotations are readily available) or at fair value.  The change in unrealized profit (loss) on open contracts from one period to the next is reflected in Change in unrealized in the Statements of Operations.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Partnership’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar; however, it transacts business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.  Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect at the dates of the Statements of Financial Condition.  Income and expense items denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect during the period.  Gains and losses resulting from the translation to U.S. dollars are reported in Realized in the Statements of Operations.

6

Operating Expenses and Selling Commissions

MLAI pays all routine operating expenses excluding the State of New Jersey filing fee (which is borne by the Partnership) but including legal, accounting, printing, postage and similar administrative expenses of the Partnership.  MLAI receives an administrative fee as well as a portion of the brokerage commissions paid to MLPF&S by the Partnership (see Note 3).

No selling commissions have been or are paid directly by the Limited Partners.  All selling commissions are paid by MLAI.

Cash at Broker

A portion of the assets maintained at MLPF&S is restricted cash required to meet maintenance margin requirements. Included in cash deposits with the broker at December 31, 2007 and 2006 is restricted cash for margin requirements of $26,426,863 and $92,042,246, respectively.

Income Taxes

No provision for income taxes has been made in the accompanying financial statements as each Partner is individually responsible for reporting income or loss based on such Partner’s share of the Partnership’s income and expenses as reported for income tax purposes.

Distributions

The Limited Partners are entitled to receive, equally per Unit, any distributions which may be made by the Partnership.  No such distributions have been declared for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005.

Subscriptions

Units are offered as of the close of business at the end of each month.  Units are purchased as of the first business day of any month at Net Asset Value, but the subscription request must be submitted at least three calendar days before the end of the preceding month.  Subscriptions submitted less than three days before the end of a month will be applied to Unit subscriptions as of the beginning of the second month after receipt, unless revoked by MLAI.

Redemptions

A Limited Partner may redeem some or all of such Partner’s Units at Net Asset Value as of the close of business on the last business day of any calendar month upon ten days’ notice (“notice period”). Units redeemed on or before the end of the twelfth full month after purchase will be assessed an early redemption charge of 4% of their Net Asset Value as of the date of redemption.  If an investor makes multiple investments in the Partnership, investments are treated on a first-in, first-out basis in determining whether a redemption charge is applicable. Redemption charges are subtracted from redemption proceeds and paid to MLAI.

7

Redemption requests are accepted within the notice period.  The Partnership does not accept any redemption requests after the notice period.  All redemption requests received after the notice period will be processed for the following month.

Dissolution of the Partnership

The Partnership will terminate on December 31, 2020 or at an earlier date if certain conditions occur, as well as under certain other circumstances as set forth in the Limited Partnership Agreement.

Indemnifications

In the normal course of business, the Partnership enters into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications.  The Partnership’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Partnership that have not yet occurred.  The Partnership expects the risk of any future obligation under these indemnifications to be remote.

8

2.CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

The Partnership’s investments, defined as Net unrealized profit on open contracts on the Statements of Financial Condition, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, are as follows:

2007	Long Positions						Short Positions							Net Unrealized
Commodity Industry Sector	Number of Contracts	Unrealized Profit (Loss)			Percent of  Partners’ Capital		Number of Contracts		Unrealized Profit (Loss)			Percent of Partners’ Capital		Profit (Loss) on Open Positions			Percent of Partners’ Capital		Maturity Dates
Agriculture	817	$	867,040		0.38	%	—		$	—		0.00	%	$	867,040		0.38	%	March 08
Currencies	542,830	(2,307,031		)	-1.02	%	(6,499,625	)	1,998,163			0.89	%	(308,868		)	-0.14	%	March 08
Interest rates	3,427	1,560,466			0.69	%	(1,230	)	(270,050		)	-0.12	%	1,290,416			0.57	%	March  08 - December 08
Energy	394	2,823,271			1.25	%	—		—			0.00	%	2,823,271			1.25	%	January 08 - March 08
Metals	142	10,748			0.00	%	(484	)	1,428,066			0.63	%	1,438,814			0.64	%	Febuary 08 - March 08
Stock indices	117	178,051			0.08	%	(291	)	1,282,136			0.57	%	1,460,187			0.65	%	March 08
Total		$	3,132,545		1.38	%			$	4,438,315		1.97	%	$	7,570,860		3.35	%

2006	Long Positions						Short Positions						Net Unrealized
Commodity Industry Sector	Number of Contracts	Unrealized Profit (Loss)			Percent of  Partners’ Capital		Number of Contracts		Unrealized Profit (Loss)		Percent of Partners’ Capital		Profit (Loss) on Open Positions		Percent of Partners’ Capital		Maturity Dates
Agriculture	205	$	84,250		0.03	%	(814	)	$	857,774	0.26	%	$	942,024	0.29	%	March 07
Currencies	591,340	(22,922		)	-0.01	%	(25,437,500	)	3,147,050		0.96	%	3,124,128		0.96	%	March 07
Interest rates	1,211	(829,692		)	-0.25	%	(5,404	)	1,287,205		0.40	%	457,513		0.14	%	Feburary 07 - December 07
Energy	88	(203,305		)	-0.06	%	(1,000	)	613,820		0.19	%	410,515		0.13	%	Feburary 07 - June 07
Metals	506	1,539,090			0.47	%	(223	)	71,455		0.02	%	1,610,545		0.49	%	January 07 - March 07
Stock indices	2,928	2,477,575			0.76	%	—		—		0.00	%	2,477,575		0.76	%	March 07
Total		$	3,044,996		0.94	%			$	5,977,305	1.83	%	$	9,022,301	2.77	%

No individual contract’s unrealized profit or loss comprised greater than 5% of the Partners’ Capital as of December 31, 2007 or 2006.

9

3.	RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
	The Partnership’s U.S. dollar assets are maintained at MLPF&S. On assets held in U.S. dollars, Merrill Lynch credits the Partnership with interest at the prevailing 91-day U.S. Treasury bill rate. The Partnership is credited with interest on any of its assets and net gains actually held by MLPF&S in non-U.S. dollar currencies at a prevailing local rate received by Merrill Lynch. Merrill Lynch may derive certain economic benefit, in excess of the interest, which Merrill Lynch pays to the Partnership, from possession of such assets.
	Merrill Lynch charges the Partnership, at prevailing local interest rates, for financing realized and unrealized losses on the Partnership’s non-U.S. dollar-denominated positions. Such amounts are netted against interest income due to the insignificance of such amounts.
	The Partnership pays brokerage commissions to MLPF&S at a flat monthly rate equal to 0.458 of 1% (a 5.50% annual rate) of the Partnership’s month-end trading assets. The Partnership pays administrative fees to MLAI at a flat monthly rate equal to 0.021 of 1% (a 0.25% annual rate) of the Partnership’s month-end trading assets. The Partnership reimburses MLAI for payment of the actual State of New Jersey annual filing fee assessed on a per partner basis with a maximum of $250,000 per year which is paid on its behalf. Month-end trading assets are not reduced, for purposes of calculating brokerage commissions and administrative fees, by any accrued brokerage commissions, administrative fees, Profit Shares or other fees or charges.
	MLAI estimates that the round-turn equivalent commission rate charged to the Partnership during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was approximately $251, $591 and $370, respectively (not including, in calculating round-turn equivalents, forward contracts on a futures-equivalent basis).
	MLPF&S pays Sunrise a monthly consulting fee of 0.083 of 1% (a 1% annual rate) of the month-end trading assets, after reduction for a portion of the brokerage commissions.
4.	ADVISORY AGREEMENT
	The Partnership entered into an Advisory Agreement with Sunrise. The Advisory Agreement between the Partnership and Sunrise continues to be in effect, subject to certain renewal rights exercisable by the Partnership. Sunrise determines the commodity futures, options on futures and forward contracts traded by the Partnership, subject to certain trading policies and to certain rights reserved by MLAI.
	Profit Shares equal to 23% of any New Trading Profit, as defined, as of the end of each calendar year are paid to Sunrise. Profit Shares are also paid out in respect of Units redeemed (to the extent they exceed the number of Units purchased) as of the end of interim months during a calendar year, to the extent of the applicable percentage of any New Trading Profit attributable to such Units.
5.	WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNITS
	The weighted average number of Units outstanding is computed for purposes of calculating net income (loss) per weighted average Unit. The weighted average number of Units outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 equaled the Units outstanding as of such date, adjusted proportionately for Units sold or redeemed based on the respective length of time each was outstanding during such year.

10

6.RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS 157”).  FAS 157 establishes a common definition for fair value under U.S. GAAP which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about such fair value measurements.  FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FAS 157 on its financial statements and disclosures.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Partnership adopted the provisions of the FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48’), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes the minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet in connection with accounting for uncertainties in income tax positions taken or expected to be taken by an entity before being measured and recognized in the financial statements. The implementation of this pronouncement had no impact on the financial statements.

7.MARKET AND CREDIT RISKS

The nature of this Partnership has certain risks, which cannot all be presented on the financial statements.  The following summarizes some of those risks.

Market Risk

Derivative instruments involve varying degrees of market risk.  Changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates or the market values of the financial instruments or commodities underlying such derivative instruments frequently result in changes in the Partnership’s net unrealized profit (loss) on such derivative instruments as reflected in the Statements of Financial Condition.  The Partnership’s exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the relationships among the derivative instruments held by the Partnership as well as the volatility and liquidity of the markets in which the derivative instruments are traded.  Investments in foreign markets may also entail legal and political risks.

MLAI has procedures in place intended to control market risk exposure, although there can be no assurance that they will, in fact, succeed in doing so.  These procedures focus primarily on monitoring the trading of Sunrise, calculating the Net Asset Value of the Partnership as of the close of business on each day and reviewing outstanding positions for over-concentrations.  While MLAI does not itself intervene in the markets to hedge or diversify the Partnership’s market exposure, MLAI may urge Sunrise to reallocate positions in an attempt to avoid over-concentrations.  However, such interventions are unusual and unless it appears that Sunrise has begun to deviate from past practice or trading policies or to be trading erratically, MLAI’s basic risk control procedures consist simply of the ongoing process of advisor monitoring, with the market risk controls being applied by Sunrise.

Credit Risk

The risks associated with exchange-traded contracts are typically perceived to be less than those associated with over-the-counter (non-exchange-traded) transactions, because exchanges typically (but not universally) provide clearinghouse arrangements in which the collective credit (in some cases

11

limited in amount, in some cases not) of the members of the exchange is pledged to support the financial integrity of the exchange.  In over-the-counter transactions, on the other hand, traders must rely solely on the credit of their respective individual counterparties.  Margins, which may be subject to loss in the event of a default, are generally required in exchange trading, and counterparties may also require margin in the over-the-counter markets.

The credit risk associated with these instruments from counterparty nonperformance is the net unrealized profit on open contracts, if any, included in the Statements of Financial Condition.  The Partnership attempts to mitigate this risk by dealing exclusively with Merrill Lynch entities as clearing brokers.

The Partnership, in its normal course of business, enters into various contracts, with MLPF&S acting as its commodity broker.  Pursuant to the brokerage agreement with MLPF&S (which includes a netting arrangement), to the extent that such trading results in receivables from and payables to MLPF&S, these receivables and payables are offset and reported as a net receivable or payable and included in Net unrealized profit on open contracts on the Statements of Financial Condition.

12

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *      *

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the

undersigned, the information contained in this

report is accurate and complete.

/s/ Barbra E. Kocsis

Barbra E. Kocsis

Chief Financial Officer

Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC

General Partner of

ML Select Futures I L.P.

13

EX-31.01

EXHIBIT 31.01

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

I, Paul Morton, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the general partner of ML Select Futures I L.P. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of ML Select Futures I L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of  the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2008
By:	/s/ Paul Morton
Paul Morton
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.02

EXHIBIT 31.02

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the general partner of ML Select Futures I L.P. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of ML Select Futures I L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2008
By	/s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS
Barbra E. Kocsis
Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.01

EXHIBIT 32.01

Section 1350 Certification

In connection with this annual report of ML Select Futures I L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Paul Morton, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2008
By:	/s/ Paul Morton
Paul Morton
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-32.02

EXHIBIT 32.02

Section 1350 Certification

In connection with this annual report of ML Select Futures I L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2008
By	/s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS
Barbra E. Kocsis
Chief Financial Officer