10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                                                                               to                                                                              

Commission file number 0-17592

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	13-4058320
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
900 King Street, Suite 100, Rye Brook, New York	10573
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (914) 307-7000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Limited Interests

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (ad defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes ¨    No  þ

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Annual Report to Interest holders for the year ended December 31, 2005 is incorporated by reference into Parts II and IV of this Annual Report on Form 10-K

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

(a Delaware Business Trust)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
PART I
Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	9
Item 2.	Properties	9
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	9
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Interest Holders	9
PART II
Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Interests, Related Interest Holders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	9
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	10
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	10
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	13
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	16
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	16
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	17
Item 9B.	Other Information	17
PART III
Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	17
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	20
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Interest Holders Matters	20
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	20
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	21
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K	21
	Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules	21
	Exhibits	21-22
	Reports on Form 8-K	22
SIGNATURES		23

2

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

World Monitor Trust II (the “Trust”) is a business trust organized under the laws of Delaware on April 22, 1999. The Trust consists of three separate and distinct series (“Series”); Series D, E and F. Series D, E and F commenced trading operations on March 13, 2000, April 5, 2000 and March 1, 2000, respectively, and each Series will continue to exist until terminated pursuant to the provisions of Article XIII as provided in the Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement (the “Trust Agreement”). The assets of each Series are segregated from those of the other Series, separately valued and independently managed. Each Series was formed to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of futures, forward and options contracts, and may, from time to time, engage in cash and spot transactions. The trustee of the Trust is Wilmington Trust Company. The Trust’s fiscal year for book and tax purposes ends on December 31.

Series F (the “Registrant”) is engaged solely in the business of commodity futures and forward trading; therefore, presentation of industry segment information is not applicable.

On July 1, 2003, Prudential Financial, Inc. (“Prudential”) and Wachovia Corp. (“Wachovia”) combined their separate retail securities brokerage and clearing businesses under a new holding company named Wachovia/Prudential Financial Advisors, LLC (“WPFA”); owned 62% by Wachovia and 38% by Prudential. As a result, the retail brokerage operations of Prudential Securities (“PSI”) were contributed to Wachovia Securities, LLC (“Wachovia Securities”). Wachovia Securities is wholly-owned by WPFA and is a registered broker-dealer and a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) and all major securities exchanges. The Registrant and its Managing Owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PSI, entered into a service agreement with Wachovia Securities, effective July 1, 2003. Pursuant to this agreement, Wachovia Securities agreed to provide certain enumerated services to accounts of the limited interest owners carried at Wachovia.

Effective July 1, 2003, PSI changed its name to Prudential Equity Group, Inc. (“PEG”). PEG remained an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential. PEG was a registered broker-dealer and a member of the NASD and all major securities exchanges and conducted the equity research, domestic and international equity sales and trading operations, and commodity brokerage and derivative operations it had previously conducted as PSI until December 31, 2003. As part of the process of reorganizing its business structure, Prudential Securities Group Inc. (“PSG”), the direct parent of PEG and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential, transferred the commodity brokerage, commodity clearing and derivative operations previously performed by PEG to another PSG indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary, Prudential Financial Derivatives, LLC (“PFD”) effective January 1, 2004. Like PEG, PFD is registered as a futures commission merchant under the Commodity Exchange Act and is a member of the National Futures Association. On April 1, 2004, PEG transferred the ownership of the Managing Owner and PFD Holdings, LLC, the direct parent of PFD to PSG.

On June 30, 2004, PSG and Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., formerly Kenmar Advisory Corp. (“Preferred”), entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which PSG would sell, and Preferred would buy, all of the capital stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the then current Managing Owner of the Registrant) and another commodity pool operator owned by PSG. In connection with the transaction, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. solicited proxies seeking approval from the Registrant’s interest holders for (i) the sale of the stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. to Preferred; (ii) the concomitant approval of Preferred as the new Managing Owner of the Registrant; and (iii) the approval of certain amendments to the Declaration of the Trust and Trust Agreement of the Trust. A Report on Form 8-K describing the transaction was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2004 and the definitive proxies were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 20, 2004.

As of October 1, 2004, Preferred acquired from PSG all of the outstanding stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. Immediately after such acquisition, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. was merged with and into Preferred. Accordingly, as of October 1, 2004 all of the board of directors and officers of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. resigned. Following Preferred’s acquisition of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. and its merger with and into Preferred, Preferred became the successor Managing Owner of the Registrant.

Effective December 6, 2004, Series F contributed its net assets to WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “Company”) and received a Voting Membership Interest in the Company. The Company was formed to function as an aggregate trading vehicle. The sole members of the Company are Series F and World Monitor Trust – Series A (“Series A”). Preferred is the Managing Owner of Series A and has been delegated administrative authority over the operations of the Company. The Company engages in the speculative trading of futures and forwards contracts. The financial statements of the Company, including the condensed schedule of investments, are included in Section II of these financial statements and should be used in conjunction with Series F’s financial statements.

Managing Owner and its Affiliates

The term Managing Owner, as used herein, refers either to Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. or Preferred, depending upon the applicable period discussed.

3

The Managing Owner is required to maintain at least a 1% interest in the capital, profits and losses of each Series so long as it is acting as the Managing Owner.

The Offering

Up to $50,000,000 of limited interests in each Series (“Limited Interests”) were being offered once each week (totaling $150,000,000) (“Subscription Maximum”), until each Series’ Subscription Maximum was met either through sale or exchange or until the Managing Owner, suspended the offering of Limited Interests. Limited Interests were being offered to investors who met certain established suitability standards, with a minimum initial subscription of $5,000 ($2,000 for an individual retirement account), although the minimum purchase for any single Series was $1,000. General interests were also being sold exclusively to the Managing Owner. Limited Interests and general Interests are sometimes referred to as “Interests”.

Initially, the Limited Interests for each Series were offered for a period of up to 180 days after the date of the Prospectus (“Initial Offering Period”) at $100 per Interest. The subscription minimum of $5,000,000 for each Series was reached during the Initial Offering Period permitting Series D, E and F to commence trading operations. The Registrant completed its initial offering on March 1, 2000 with gross proceeds of $5,185,012, which was fully allocated to commodities trading. Until the Subscription Maximum for each Series has been reached, each Series’ Limited Interests were offered on a weekly basis at the then current net asset value per Interest (“Continuous Offering Period”). During the Continuous Offering Period through December 31, 2003 , Series F raised additional gross proceeds of $45,240,236 from the sales of Interests. The Registrant and Series E were offered until they substantially achieved their Subscription Maximum during June 2003 and July 2003, respectively. In addition, since July 2003, the weekly offering of interests in Series D has been suspended. Accordingly, at this time Interests may not be offered or exchanged.

The Trading Advisor

Each Series has its own independent commodity trading advisor that makes that Series’ trading decisions. The Managing Owner, on behalf of the Registrant, entered into an advisory agreement with Campbell & Company, Inc. (the “Trading Advisor”) to make the trading decisions for Series F. The advisory agreement may be terminated for various reasons, including at the discretion of the Managing Owner. The Managing Owner has allocated 100% of the proceeds from the initial and continuous offering of the Registrant to the Trading Advisor.

Effective December 6, 2004, the Managing Owner terminated the advisory agreement with the Trading Advisor concurrent with Series F’s investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.

Competition

The Managing Owner and its affiliates have formed, and may continue to form, various entities to engage in the speculative trading of futures, forward and options contracts which have certain of the same investment policies as the Registrant.

The Registrant was an open-end fund which solicited the sale of additional Limited Interests on a weekly basis until the Subscription Maximum was reached. As such, the Registrant no longer competes with other entities to attract new participants. However, to the extent that the Trading Advisor recommends similar or identical trades to the Registrant and other accounts which it manages, the Registrant may compete with those accounts for the execution of the same or similar trades, as well as with other market participants.

Employees

The Registrant has no employees. Management and administrative services for the Registrant are performed by the Managing Owner or third parties pursuant to the Trust Agreement, as further discussed in Notes 1,3 and 4 to the Registrant’s financial statements included in its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2005 (“Registrant’s 2005 Annual Report”), which is filed as an exhibit hereto.

Available information

The Trust files quarterly, annual and current reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports are available to read and copy at the SEC’s Public Reference Facilities in Washington, D.C. at 459 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC’s toll free number, 1-800-SEC-0330, for further information. The Trust does not maintain a website where these reports are posted. However, the Trust’s filings are posted on the SEC’s website at htttp://www.sec.gov.

4

Item 1A. Risk Factors

THE RISKS YOU FACE

You Should Not Rely on Past Performance in Deciding Whether to Buy Units

Each Advisor selected by the Managing Owner to manage the assets of each Trust has a performance history through the date of its selection by The Managing Owner. You must consider, however, the uncertain significance of past performance, and you should not rely on the Advisors’ or the Managing Owner’s records to date for predictive purposes. You should not assume that any Advisor’s future trading decisions will create profit, avoid substantial losses or result in performance for the Trust that is comparable to that Advisor’s or to the Managing Owner’s past performance. In fact, as a significant amount of academic study has shown, futures funds more frequently than not underperforms the past performance records included in their prospectuses.

Price Volatility May Possibly Cause the Total Loss of Your Investment

Futures and forward contracts have a high degree of price variability and are subject to occasional rapid and substantial changes. Consequently, you could lose all or substantially all of your investment in any Trust of the Trust.

Speculative and Volatile Markets Combined With Highly Leveraged Trading May Cause the Trust to Incur Substantial Losses.

The markets in which each Trust trades are speculative, highly leveraged and involve a high degree of risk. Each Advisor’s trading considered individually involves a significant risk of incurring large losses, and there can be no assurance that any Trust will not incur such losses. Futures and forward prices are volatile. Volatility increases risk, particularly when trading with leverage. Trading on a highly leveraged basis, as does each Trust, even in stable markets involves risk; doing so in volatile markets necessarily involves a substantial risk of sudden, significant losses. Due to such leverage, even a small movement in price could cause large losses for the Trust. Market volatility will increase the potential for large losses. Market volatility and leverage mean that any Trust could incur substantial losses, potentially impairing its equity base and ability to achieve its long-term profit objectives even if favorable market conditions subsequently develop.

Fees and Commissions are Charged Regardless of Profitability and May Result in Depletion of Trust Assets

Each Trust is subject to the fees and expenses which are payable irrespective of profitability in addition to performance fees which, are payable based on the profitability of such Trust, or if a multi-advisor fund, upon each advisors performance. Consequently, the expenses of each Trust could, over time, result in significant losses to your investment therein.

Market Conditions May Impair Profitability

The trading systems used by certain Advisors are technical, trend-following methods. The profitability of trading under these systems depends on, among other things, the occurrence of significant price trends, which are sustained movements, up or down, in futures and forward prices. Such trends may not develop; there have been periods in the past without price trends. The likelihood of the Units of any Trust being profitable could be materially diminished during periods when events external to the markets themselves have an important impact on prices. During such periods, Advisors’ historic price analysis could establish positions on the wrong side of the price movements caused by such events.

Discretionary Trading Strategies May Incur Substantial Losses

Discretionary traders, while they may utilize market charts, computer programs and compilations of quantifiable fundamental information to assist them in making trading decisions, make such decisions on the basis of their own judgment and “trading instinct,” not on the basis of trading signals generated by any program or model. Such traders may be more prone to subjective judgments, which may have greater potentially adverse effects on their performance than systematic traders, which emphasize eliminating the effects of “emotionalism” on their trading. Reliance on trading judgment may, over time, produce less consistent trading results than implementing a systematic approach. Discretionary traders, like trend-following traders, are unlikely to be profitable unless major price movements occur. Discretionary traders are highly unpredictable, and can incur substantial losses even in apparently favorable markets.

5

Systematic Trading Strategies May Incur Substantial Losses

A systematic trader will generally rely to some degree on judgmental decisions concerning, for example, what markets to follow and commodities to trade, when to liquidate a position in a contract which is about to expire and how large a position to take in a particular commodity. Although these judgmental decisions may have a substantial effect on a systematic trader’s performance, such trader’s primary reliance is on trading programs or models that generate trading signals. The systems utilized to generate trading signals are changed from time to time (although generally infrequently), but the trading instructions generated by the systems being used are followed without significant additional analysis or interpretation. Therefore, systematic trading may incur substantial losses by failing to capitalize on market trends that their systems would otherwise have exploited by applying their generally mechanical trading systems by judgmental decisions of employees. Furthermore, any trading system or trader may suffer substantial losses by misjudging the market. Systematic traders tend to rely on computerized programs, and some consider the prospect of disciplined trading, which largely removes the emotion of the individual trader from the trading process, advantageous. Due to their reliance upon computers, systematic traders are generally able to incorporate a significant amount of data into a particular trading decision. However, when fundamental factors dominate the market, trading systems may suffer rapid and severe losses due to their inability to respond to such factors until such factors have had a sufficient effect on the market to create a trend of enough magnitude to generate a reversal of trading signals, by which time a precipitous price change may already be in progress, preventing liquidation at anything but substantial losses.

Decisions Based Upon Fundamental Analysis May Not Result in Profitable Trading

Traders that utilize fundamental trading strategies attempt to examine factors external to the trading market that affect the supply and demand for a particular futures and forward contracts in order to predict future prices. Such analysis may not result in profitable trading because the analyst may not have knowledge of all factors affecting supply and demand, prices may often be affected by unrelated factors, and purely fundamental analysis may not enable the trader to determine quickly that previous trading decisions were incorrect. In addition, because of the breadth of fundamental data that exists, a fundamental trader may not be able to follow developments in all such data, but instead may specialize in analyzing a narrow set of data, requiring trading in fewer markets. Consequently, a fundamental trader may have less flexibility in adverse markets to trade other futures and forward markets than traders that do not limit the number of markets traded as a result of a specialized focus.

Increase in Assets Under Management May Affect Trading Decisions

The more equity an Advisor manages, the more difficult it may be for that Advisor to trade profitably because of the difficulty of trading larger positions without adversely affecting prices and performance. Accordingly, such increases in equity under management may require one or more of the Advisors to modify trading decisions for the relevant Trust, which could have a detrimental effect on your investment in such Trust.

You cannot be Assured of the Advisors’ Continued Services Which May Be Detrimental to Trust

You cannot be assured that any Advisor will be willing or able to continue to provide advisory services to the Trust for any length of time. There is severe competition for the services of qualified trading advisors, and a Trust may not be able to retain satisfactory replacement or additional trading advisors on acceptable terms or a current Advisor may require the Trust to pay higher fees in order to be able to retain such Advisor.

Limited Ability to Liquidate Your Investment

There is no secondary market for the Units. While the Units have redemption rights, there are restrictions, and possible fees assessed. Transfers of Units are subject to limitations, and the Managing Owner may deny a request to transfer if it determines that the transfer may result in adverse legal or tax consequences for the Trust.

Possible Illiquid Markets May Exacerbate Losses

Futures and forward positions cannot always be liquidated at the desired price. It is difficult to execute a trade at a specific price when there is a relatively small volume of buy and sell orders in a market. A market disruption, such as when foreign governments may take or be subject to political actions, which disrupt the markets in their currency or major exports, can also make it difficult to liquidate a position. Such periods of illiquidity and the events that trigger them are difficult to predict and there can be no assurance that any Advisor will be able to do so. There can be no assurance that market illiquidity will not cause losses for the Trust. The large size of the positions which an Advisor is expected to acquire for the Trust increases the risk of illiquidity by both making its positions more difficult to liquidate and increasing the losses incurred while trying to do so.

The risk of loss due to potentially illiquid markets is more acute in respect of over-the-counter instruments than in respect of exchange-traded instruments because the performance of those contracts is not guaranteed by an exchange or clearinghouse and the Trust will be at risk to the ability of the counterparty to the instrument to perform its obligations thereunder. Because these markets are not regulated, there are no specific standards or regulatory supervision of trade pricing and other trading activities that occur in those markets.

6

Because No Trust Acquires Any Asset with Intrinsic Value, the Positive Performance of Your Investment Is Wholly Dependent Upon an Equal and Offsetting Loss

Futures trading is a risk transfer economic activity. For every gain there is an equal and offsetting loss rather than an opportunity to participate over time in general economic growth. Unlike most alternative investments, an investment in a Trust does not involve acquiring any asset with intrinsic value. Overall stock and bond prices could rise significantly and the economy as a whole prospers; while the Trust trades unprofitably.

Failure of Futures Trading to be Non-Correlated to General Financial Markets Will Eliminate Benefits of Diversification

Historically, managed futures generally have been non-correlated to the performance of other asset classes such as stocks and bonds. Non-correlation means that there is no statistically valid relationship between the past performance of futures and forward contracts on the one hand and stocks or bonds on the other hand. Non-correlation should not be confused with negative correlation, where the performance would be exactly opposite between two asset classes. Because of this non-correlation, no Trust can be expected to be automatically profitable during unfavorable periods for the stock market, or vice-versa. The futures and forward markets are fundamentally different from the securities markets in that for every gain in futures and forward trading, there is an equal and offsetting loss. If the Trust does not perform in a manner non-correlated with the general financial markets or does not perform successfully, you will obtain no diversification benefits by investing in the Units of such Trust and such Trust may have no gains to offset your losses from other investments.

Trading on Commodity Exchanges Outside the United States is Not Subject to U.S. Regulation

Advisors are expected to engage in some or all of its trading on behalf of the Trust on commodity exchanges outside the United States. Trading on such exchanges is not regulated by any United States governmental agency and may involve certain risks not applicable to trading on United States exchanges. In trading contracts denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, each Trust will be subject to the risk of adverse exchange-rate movements between the dollar and the functional currencies of such contracts. Investors could incur substantial losses from trading on foreign exchanges by any Trust to which such Investors would not have been subject had the Advisors limited their trading to U.S. markets.

Various Actual and Potential Conflicts of Interest May Be Detrimental to Unitholders

The Trust is subject to actual and potential conflicts of interests involving the Managing Owner, the Advisors, and various brokers and servicing agents. The Managing Owner, the Advisors, and their respective principals, all of which are engaged in other investment activities, are not required to devote substantially all of their time to the Trust’s business, which also presents the potential for numerous conflicts of interest with the Trust. As a result of these and other relationships, parties involved with the Trust have a financial incentive to act in a manner other than in the best interests of the Trust and its Unitholders. The Managing Owner has not established any formal procedure to resolve conflicts of interest. Consequently, investors will be dependent on the good faith of the respective parties subject to such conflicts to resolve them equitably. Although the Managing Owner attempts to monitor these conflicts, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the Managing Owner to ensure that these conflicts do not, in fact, result in adverse consequences to the various Trust.

The Trust may be subject to certain conflicts with respect to its Clearing Broker, its Futures Broker, and any executing broker including, but not limited to, conflicts that result from receiving greater amounts of compensation from other clients, purchasing opposite or competing positions on behalf of third party accounts traded through the Clearing Broker, the Futures Broker and executing brokers.

Unitholders Taxed Currently

Unitholders of a Trust are subject to tax each year on their allocable share of the income or gains (if any) of such Trust, whether or not they receive distributions. Moreover, the Managing Owner does not intend to make any distributions to Unitholders in respect of any Trust. Consequently, Unitholders of a Trust will be required either to redeem Units or to make use of other sources of funds to discharge their tax liabilities in respect of any profits earned by such Trust.

In comparing the profit objectives of each Trust with the performance of more familiar securities in which one might invest, prospective investors must recognize that if they purchased equity or debt, there probably would be no tax due on the appreciation in the value of such holdings until disposition. In the case of each Trust, on the other hand, a significant portion of any appreciation in the Net Asset Value per Unit must be paid in taxes by the Unitholders of such Trust every year, resulting in a substantial cumulative reduction in their net after-tax returns. Because Unitholders of a Trust will be taxed currently on their allocable share of the income or gains of such Trust, if any, the Trust may trade successfully but investors nevertheless would have recognized significantly greater gains on an after-tax basis had they invested in conventional stocks with comparable performance.

7

Limitation on Deductibility of “Investment Advisory Fees”

Non-corporate Unitholders of a Trust may be required to treat the amount of Incentive Fees and other expenses of such Trust as “investment advisory fees” which may be subject to substantial restrictions on deductibility for federal income tax purposes. In the absence of further regulatory or statutory clarification, the Managing Owner is not classifying these expenses as “investment advisory fees,” but this is a position to which the Internal Revenue Service (“the IRS”) may object. If a substantial portion of the fees and other expenses of a Trust were characterized as “investment advisory fees,” an investment in such Trust might no longer be economically viable.

Taxation of Interest Income Irrespective of Trading Losses

With respect to each Trust, the Net Asset Value per Unit reflects the trading profits and losses as well as the interest income earned and expenses incurred by such Trust. However, losses on such Trust’s trading will be almost exclusively capital losses, and capital losses are deductible against ordinary income only to the extent of $3,000 per year in the case of non-corporate taxpayers. Consequently, if a non-corporate Unitholder had, for example, an allocable trading (i.e., capital) loss of $10,000 in a given fiscal year and allocable interest (i.e., ordinary) income (after reduction for expenses) of $5,000, the Unitholder would have incurred a net loss in the Net Asset Value of such Unitholder’s Units equal to $5,000 but would recognize taxable income of $2,000 (assuming a 40% tax rate). The limited deductibility of capital losses for non-corporate Unitholders could result in such Unitholders having a tax liability in respect of their investment in a Trust of the Trust despite incurring a financial loss on their Units of such Trust.

Possibility of a Tax Audit of Both the Trust and the Unitholders

There can be no assurance that the tax returns of each Trust will not be audited by the IRS. If such an audit results in an adjustment, Unitholders of such Trust could themselves be audited as well as being required to pay additional taxes, interest and possibly penalties.

Failure or Lack of Segregation of Assets May Increase Losses

The Commodity Exchange Act requires a clearing broker to segregate all funds received from customers from such broker’s proprietary assets. If the Clearing Broker fails to do so, the assets of any Trust might not be fully protected in the event of their bankruptcy. Furthermore, in the event of the Clearing Broker’s bankruptcy, any Trust could be limited to recovering only a pro rata share of all available funds segregated on behalf of the Clearing Broker’s combined customer accounts, even though certain property specifically traceable to such Trust (for example, Treasury bills deposited by such Trust with the Clearing Broker as margin) was held by the Clearing Broker.

Default by Counterparty and Credit Risk Could Cause Substantial Losses

Dealers in forward contracts are not regulated by the Commodity Exchange Act and are not obligated to segregate customer assets. As a result, Unitholders do not have such basic protections with respect to the trading in forward contracts by any Trust. This lack of regulation in these markets could expose a Trust in certain circumstances to significant losses in the event of trading abuses or financial failure by the counterparties. Each Trust also faces the risk of non-performance by the counterparties to the over-the-counter contracts. Unlike in futures contracts, the counterparty to these contracts is generally a single bank or other financial institution, rather than a clearing organization backed by a group of financial institutions. As a result, there will be greater counterparty credit risk in these transactions. The clearing member, clearing organization or other counterparty may not be able to meet its obligations, in which case the applicable Trust could suffer significant losses on these contracts.

Regulatory Changes or Actions May Alter the Nature of an Investment in the Trust

Considerable regulatory attention has been focused on non-traditional investment pools, in particular commodity pools such as the Trust, publicly distributed in the United States. There has been significant international governmental concern expressed regarding, for example, (i) the disruptive effects of speculative trading on the central banks’ attempts to influence exchange rates and (ii) the need to regulate the derivatives markets in general. There is a possibility of future regulatory changes altering, perhaps to a material extent, the nature of an investment in any Trust.

The futures markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations, and margin requirements. In addition, the CFTC and the exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of a market emergency, including, for example, the retroactive implementation of speculative position limits or higher margin requirements, the establishment of daily price limits and the suspension of trading. The regulation of futures and forward transactions in the United States is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to modification by government and judicial action. The effect of any future regulatory change on the Trust is impossible to predict, but could be substantial and adverse.

8

Trust Trading is Not Transparent

Trading decisions in respect of each Trust, are made by the Advisor or Advisors. While the Managing Owner receives daily trade confirmations from the Clearing Broker and foreign exchange dealers, such information is not provided to Unitholders and each Trust’s trading results are reported to the Unitholders. Accordingly, an investment in a Trust does not offer you the same transparency, i.e., an ability to review all investment positions daily that a personal trading account offers.

Lack of Independent Experts Representing Investors

The Managing Owner has consulted with counsel, accountants and other experts regarding the formation and operation of the Trust. Accordingly, you should consult your own legal, tax and financial advisers regarding the desirability of an investment in the Trust.

Forwards, Swaps, Hybrids and Other Derivatives are Not Subject to CFTC Regulation

Each Trust may trade foreign exchange contracts in the interbank market. Since forward contracts are traded in unregulated markets between principals, the commodity pools also assume the risk of loss from counterparty nonperformance. In the future, the Trust may also trade swap agreements, hybrid instruments and other off-exchange contracts. Swap agreements involve trading income streams such as fixed rate or floating rate interest. Hybrids are instruments, which combine features of a security with those of a futures contract. Because there is no exchange or clearinghouse for these contracts, the Trust will be subject to the credit risk and nonperformance of the counterparty. Additionally, because these off-exchange contracts are not regulated by the CFTC, no Trust will receive the protections, which are provided by the CFTC’s regulatory scheme.

Possibility of Termination of the Trust or any Trust Before Expiration of its Stated Term

As Managing Owner, the Managing Owner may withdraw from the Trust, which would cause the Trust to terminate unless a Substitute Managing Owner was appointed. Other events, such as a long-term substantial loss suffered by any Trust, could also cause such Trust to terminate before the expiration of its stated term. This could cause you to liquidate your investments and upset the overall maturity and timing of your investment portfolio. If the registrations with the CFTC or memberships in the NFA of the Managing Owner or the Clearing Broker were revoked or suspended, such entity would no longer be able to provide services to the Trust.

Item 1B.     Unresolved Staff Comments

None

Item 2.     Properties

The Registrant does not own or use any physical properties in the conduct of its business. The Registrant’s only place of business is the place of business of Preferred.

Certain administrative services are provided by DPM Mellon which is located at 400 Atrium Drive, Somerset, New Jersey 08873.

Item 3.     Legal Proceedings

There are no material proceedings pending by or against the Registrant or the Managing Owner.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Interest Holders

None

PART II

Item 5.     Market for the Registrant’s Interests, Related Interest Holder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Information with respect to the offering of Interests and the use of proceeds is incorporated by reference to Note 1 to the Registrant’s 2005 Annual Report, which is filed as an exhibit hereto.

9

A significant secondary market for the Limited Interests has not developed, and is not expected to develop in the future. There are also certain restrictions set forth in the Trust Agreement limiting the ability of an Interest holder to transfer Interests. However, Limited Interests may be redeemed on a weekly basis, but are subject to a redemption fee if transacted within one year of the effective date of purchase. Additionally, Interests owned in one Series of the Trust (Series D, E, or F) could be exchanged, without any charge, for Interests of one or more other Series on a weekly basis for as long as Limited Interests in those Series were being offered to the public. Exchanges and Redemptions are calculated based on the applicable Series’ then current net asset value per Interest as of the close of business on the Friday immediately preceding the week in which the exchange or redemption request is effected. At this time, Interests may not be exchanged as Interests are not currently being offered. Future redemptions and exchanges will impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contracts in subsequent periods.

There are no material restrictions upon the Registrant’s present or future ability to make distributions in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Agreement. No distributions have been made since inception and no distributions are anticipated in the future.

As of March 10, 2006, there were 1,739 holders of record owning 221,958.349 Interests which include 2,408 units of general interests.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table presents selected financial data of the Registrant. This data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Registrant and the notes thereto on pages 3 through 17 of the Registrant’s 2005 Annual Report which is filed as an exhibit hereto.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005		2004		2003		2002		2001
Total revenues (including interest)	$	6,766,748	$	7,470,124	$	9,403,765	$	4,198,419	$	1,019,955
Net income (loss)	$	3,424,598	$	1,605,731	$	4,809,505	$	2,184,146	$	(35,150	)
Net income (loss) per weighted average Interest	$	13.48	$	5.31	$	15.90	$	14.83	$	(0.36	)
Total assets	$	37,282,177	$	39,363,041	$	48,113,536	$	22,906,675	$	12,410,300
Net asset value per Interest	$	157.41	$	143.69	$	139.26	$	118.76	$	106.40

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

Preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the application of appropriate accounting rules and guidance, as well as the use of estimates. Series F’s application of these policies involves judgments and actual results may differ from the estimates used.

The Managing Owner has evaluated the nature and types of estimates that it makes in preparing Series F’s financial statements and related disclosures and has determined that the valuation of its investments which are not traded on a United States or Internationally recognized futures exchange involves a critical accounting policy. The market values of futures (exchange traded) contracts is verified by the administrator who obtains valuation data from third party data providers such as Bloomberg and Reuters and compares those prices with Series F’s broker. The market value of currency swap and forward (non-exchange traded) contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of 3 PM on the last business day of the reporting period. All values assigned by the administrator and confirmed by the Managing Owner are final and conclusive as to all Interest holders.

As such, if actual results vary from estimates used, they are anticipated to not have a material impact on the financial statements and related disclosures.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Series F commenced operations on March 1, 2000 with gross proceeds of $5,185,012 allocated to commodities trading. Additional contributions raised through the continuous offering from the sales of Interests for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and for the period from March 1, 2000 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2003 resulted in additional gross proceeds to Series F of $25,083,700, $10,795,194, and $45,240,236, respectively. Series F’s Interests were offered until it substantially achieved its subscription maximum of $50,000,000 on the sale of Limited Interests during July 2003.

10

Limited Interests in Series F may be redeemed on a weekly basis, but are subject to a redemption fee if transacted within one year of the effective date of purchase. Redemptions of Limited interests for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were $5,529,361 and $9,755,584, respectively and redemptions of general interests were $59,476 and $86,845 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. Redemptions of Limited Interests and general interests for the period from March 1, 2000 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2005 were $21,641,235 and $189,948, respectively. Additionally, Interests owned in any series of World Monitor Trust II (Series D, E or F) could be exchanged, without any charge, for interests of one or more other series of World Monitor Trust II on a weekly basis for as long as Limited Interests in those series are being offered to the public. Series F and World Monitor Trust II—Series E are no longer offered to the public as those series substantially achieved their subscription maximums during July 2003 and June 2003, respectively. In addition, since July 2003, the offering of interests in World Monitor Trust II—Series D (“Series D”) has been suspended. Accordingly, at this time, Interests may not be exchanged. Future contributions, redemptions and exchanges will impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contracts in subsequent periods.

At December 31, 2005, 100% of Series F’s net assets were allocated to commodities trading. A significant portion of the net assets was held in cash which was used as margin for trading in commodities. In as much as the sole business of Series F is to trade in commodities, Series F continues to own such liquid assets to be used as margin. PEG credits Series F with interest income on 100% of its average daily equity maintained in its accounts with PEG during each month at the 13-week Treasury bill discount rate.

The commodities contracts may be subject to periods of illiquidity because of market conditions, regulatory considerations and other reasons. For example, commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in certain commodity futures contract prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily limits.” During a single day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract for a particular commodity has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in the commodity can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit. Commodity futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Such market conditions could prevent Series F from promptly liquidating its commodity futures positions.

Since Series F’s business is to trade futures and forward contracts, primarily through its investment in the Trading Vehicle, its capital is at risk due to changes in the value of these contracts (market risk) or the inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the contracts (credit risk). Series F’s exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors including the volatility of interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, the liquidity of the markets in which the contracts are traded and the relationships among the contracts held. The inherent uncertainty of Series F’s speculative trading as well as the development of drastic market occurrences could result in monthly losses considerably beyond Series F’s experience to date and could ultimately lead to a loss of all or substantially all of investors’ capital. The Managing Owner attempts to minimize these risks by requiring Series F and its Trading Advisor to abide by various trading limitations and policies which include limiting margin amounts, trading only in liquid markets and permitting the use of stop loss provisions. See Note 7 of the Registrant’s 2005 Annual Report.

Series F does not have, nor does it expect to have, any capital assets.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

As of December 31, 2005, Series F had not utilized special purpose entities to facilitate off-balance sheet financing arrangements and has no loan guarantee arrangements or off-balance sheet arrangements of any kind other than agreements entered into in the normal course of business, which may include indemnification provisions related to certain risks service providers, such as our accountants, undertake in performing services which are in the best interests of Series F. While Series F’s exposure under such indemnification provisions cannot be estimated, these general business indemnifications are not expected to have material impact on Series F’s financial position.

Series F’s contractual obligations are with the Trading Advisor and its commodity broker. Payments made under Series F’s agreement with the Trading Advisor are at a fixed rate, calculated as a percentage of Series F’s “New High Net Trading Profits”. Management fee payments made to the Trading Advisor and commission payments to the commodity broker are calculated as a fixed percentage of Series F’s NAV’s. As such, the Managing Owner cannot anticipate the amount of payments that will be required under these agreements for future periods as NAV’s are not known until a future date. These agreements are effective for one-year terms, renewable automatically for additional one-year terms unless terminated. Additionally, these agreements may be terminated by either party for various reasons. For a further discussion on these payments, see Notes 1 and 3 of Series F’s 2005 Annual Report.

Results of Operations

The net asset value per Interest as of December 31, 2005, was $157.41, an increase of 9.55% from the December 31, 2004 net asset value per Interest of $143.69 which was a increase of 3.18% from the December 31, 2003 net asset value per Interest of $139.26. The CISDM CPO Asset Weighted Index (formerly known as the CISDM Fund/Pool Qualified Universe Index) returned 5.97% and 3.22% for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The CISDM Fund/Pool Qualified Universe Index is the dollar weighted, total return of all commodity pools tracked by Managed Account Reports, LLC. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

11

Series F’s trading gains before commissions and related fees for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were approximately $5,585,000, $6,897,000 and $8,999,000, respectively. Due to the nature of Series F’s trading activities, a period to period comparison of its trading results is not meaningful. However, a detailed discussion of the trading results for the year ended December 31, 2005 is presented below.

2005 was an eventful year in the global economic markets. The rise in global energy prices to historic highs was a primary factor that dominated the global economy, along with many other economic, geopolitical and social issues.

The U.S. equity markets lagged most foreign equity markets in 2005. The Dow Jones Industrial Index had its first annual loss since 2002, while the technology oriented Nasdaq Index had a modest 1% gain and the S&P 500 Index gained 3% for the year. Overall corporate earnings exceeded expectations for most of the year, including the third and fourth quarters. The impact of several hurricanes, high energy prices and rising interest rates were among the negative factors for the year.

European equity markets out-performed the U.S. equity markets by a significant margin for much of the year, with the fourth quarter being particularly strong. Among the three major indices, the German DAX gained 27%, the French CAC 40 gained 23% and the British FTSE 100 was up 17%. Asian equities were stronger than European equities, as South Korea’s Kospi increased 54% and Japan’s Nikkei rose 40%. The Nikkei finished the year with seven consecutive monthly gains. Australia’s All Ordinaries increased 17%.

One of the notable themes in U.S. interest rates was a flattening yield curve and a gradual trend toward inversion. The inversion finally occurred in December as the 10-year finished with a 4.39% yield versus 4.40% for the 2-year. The inversion was the first in six years. This pattern occurred in the face of 13 consecutive 25 point Federal Open Market Committee rate hikes to 4.25%. In Europe, the European Central Bank raised rates 25 points to 2.25% but this was not considered an indication of a cycle of rate hikes as European economic growth, while improved, remained fairly modest.

The U.S. dollar ended stronger in 2005, not withstanding a volatile trading pattern during the year. For the year, the U.S. dollar rose approximately 15% against the Japanese yen and the Euro. The interest rate differential was the primary factor behind the U.S. dollar’s solid performance. The British pound finished 2005 lower due to weakness in the U.K. economy. As a result of rate increases by the Bank of Canada, the Canadian dollar gradually gained versus the U.S. dollar, ending the year up 4.1%. The Australian dollar declined in 2005 despite rate hikes and strong equity markets. The Russian ruble decreased approximately 3.4% for the year. The full impact of the revaluation of the Chinese renminbi at midyear has yet to be realized.

Crude oil and related products were among the largest gainers in the commodities markets for 2005. Energy prices peaked in the summer, around the time of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and declined in October and November. Weather was a contributing influence to the decrease as above normal temperatures continued through the end of the year. Global demand, however, was ever increasing, with China and India in the forefront.

In the metals, gold prices steadily advanced in 2005, particularly in the final quarter of the year. Strong physical and investment demand, particularly from the Far East, was a yearlong feature. European central banks were reserved sellers and a number of other central banks, such as Russia and OPEC nations, increased the amount of gold in their reserve asset portfolios. Additionally, gold assumed the role as an alternative currency in 2005 as traders shied away from the U.S. dollar, Japanese yen and Euro. Silver prices tracked gold for much of the year due to strong physical demand from India in particular. In the base metals, copper prices rose significantly as strong Chinese demand remained a driving force throughout the year.

Profits were the result of gains in the currencies, energy, interest rate and metals sectors. Net losses for Series F were experienced in the indices sector.

Currencies: (+) The sector generated a positive return in 2005, with gains generally coming in the second and fourth quarters. Short positions in the Japanese yen and the euro produced most of the sector’s profits. Losses were generated from long and short positions in the British pound and the Swiss franc.

Energy: (+) All components of the sector contributed to profits in energy for 2005. Long positions in crude and heating oil contributed the largest gains for the year.

Indices: (-) The sector finished the year down with three of the four quarters in negative territory. A majority of the loss was due to long and short positions in the S&P 500 Index and the NASDAQ 100 Index.

Interest Rates: (+) The sector was positive for the year, achieving gains in three out of the four quarters. Long and short positions in the German Bund and BOBL were profitable, and more than made up for the losses generated by long and short positions in the 5-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes.

Metals: (+) Long positions in copper, zinc and gold proved profitable and contributed to a net gain in 2005.

12

Series F’s average net asset levels declined in 2005 versus 2004 due to redemptions despite positive trading performance for the respective periods. Series F’s average net asset levels were significantly higher in 2003 compared to 2002, due primarily to subscriptions in 2003.

Interest Income is earned on the average daily equity maintained in its accounts with its broker at the 13-week Treasury bill discount rate and, therefore, varies weekly according to interest rates, trading performance, contributions and redemptions. Interest income increased by approximately $608,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared to 2004 primarily due to the higher interest rates. Interest income increased by approximately $169,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to 2003 primarily due to increase in interest rates. Interest income increased by approximately $145,000 in 2003 compared to 2002, due to increased net assets from contributions in 2003.

Commissions are calculated on Series F’s net asset value at the end of each week and therefore, vary according to weekly trading performance, contributions and redemptions. Other transaction fees consist of National Futures Association, exchange and clearing fees as well as floor brokerage costs and give-up charges, which are based on the number of trades the Trading Advisor executes, as well as which exchange, clearing firm or bank on, or through, which the contract is traded. Commission decreased by approximately $373,000 in 2005 as compared to 2004 due to decrease in net assets discussed above. Commissions and other transaction fees increased by approximately $287,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to 2003 due to increased trading activity. Commissions increased by approximately $1,500,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to 2002, due to increases in net asset levels described above.

All trading decisions for Series F are made by Campbell & Company, Inc. (the “Trading Advisor”). Management fees are calculated on Series F’s net asset value at the end of each week, and therefore, are affected by weekly trading performance, contributions and redemptions. Management fees decreased by approximately $142,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared to 2004 and increased by approximately $78,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to 2003. Management fees increased by approximately $487,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to 2002.

Incentive fees are based on the “New High Net Trading Profits” generated by the Trading Advisor, as defined in the Advisory Agreement among Series F, the Managing Owner and the Trading Advisor. Incentive fees incurred during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and, 2003 were approximately $1,600, $1,870,000 and $1,113,000, respectively.

General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were approximately $146,000, $285,000 and $136,000, respectively. These expenses include accounting, audit, tax and legal fees as well as printing and postage costs related to reports sent to limited owners. To the extent that general and administrative expenses exceed 1.5% of Series F’s net asset value during such year (with a maximum of 0.5% attributable to other than legal and audit expenses) such amounts are borne by the Managing Owner and its affiliates.

Inflation

Inflation has had no material impact on operations or on the financial condition of Series B from inception through December 31, 2005.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Introduction

Past Results Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Performance

The Registrant is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and substantially all of the Registrant’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Registrant’s main line of business.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of the Registrant’s open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Registrant’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Registrant’s open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Registrant rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular futures market scenario will affect performance, and the Registrant’s past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Registrant could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Registrant’s speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Registrant of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Registrant’s experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the quantification included in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Registrant’s losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Registrant’s attempts to manage its market risk.

13

Standard of Materiality

Materiality as used in this section, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, optionality and multiplier features of the Registrant’s market sensitive instruments.

Quantifying The Registrant’s Trading Value at Risk

Quantitative Forward-Looking Statements

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Registrant’s market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

The Registrant’s risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the Trading Advisor is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk. Due to the Registrant’s mark-to-market accounting, any loss in the fair value of the Registrant’s open positions is directly reflected in the Registrant’s earnings (realized or unrealized) and cash flow (at least in the case of exchange-traded contracts in which profits and losses on open positions are settled daily through variation margin).

Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Registrant as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. The maintenance margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component which is not relevant to Value at Risk.

In the case of market sensitive instruments which are not exchange-traded (almost exclusively currencies in the case of the Registrant), the margin requirements for the equivalent futures positions have been used as Value at Risk. In those rare cases in which a futures-equivalent margin is not available, dealers’ margins have been used.

In quantifying the Registrant’s Value at Risk, 100% positive correlation in the different positions held in each market risk category has been assumed. Consequently, the margin requirements applicable to the open contracts have simply been aggregated to determine each trading category’s aggregate Value at Risk. The diversification effects resulting from the fact that the Registrant’s positions are rarely, if ever, 100% positively correlated have not been reflected.

The Registrant’s Trading Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors

The following table presents the trading value at risk associated with the Registrant’s open positions by market sector at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. All open position trading risk exposures of the Registrant have been included in calculating the figure set forth below. At December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Registrant had total capitalization of approximately $36.8 and $38.9million, respectively.

	December 31, 2005				December 31, 2004
Market Sector	Value Risk		% of Total Capitalization		Value at Risk		% of Total Capitalization
Interest rates	$	1,417,042	3.85	%	$	1,265,886	3.32	%
Currencies		1,543,091	4.20	%		1,980,697	5.20	%
Commodities		737,775	2.01	%		245,697	0.65	%
Stock indices		1,123,112	3.05	%		2,029,697	5.32	%
Total	$	4,821,000	13.11	%	$	5,521,977	14.49	%

Material Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk

The notional value of the market sector instruments held by the Registrant is typically many times the applicable maintenance margin requirement (maintenance margin requirements generally range between approximately 1% and 10% of the face value) as well as many times the total capitalization of the Registrant. The magnitude of the Registrant’s open positions creates a “risk of ruin” not typically found in most other investment vehicles. Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions, although unusual, but historically recurring from time to time, could cause the Registrant to incur severe losses over a short period of time. The foregoing Value at Risk table, as well as the past performance of the Registrant give no indication of this “risk of ruin.”

14

Non-Trading Risk

The Registrant has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as any market risk they represent) are immaterial.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures

The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Registrant’s market risk exposures—except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Registrant manages its primary market risk exposures—constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Registrant’s primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by the Managing Owner and the Trading Advisor for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks are one of which could cause the actual results of the Registrant’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Registrant. There can be no assurance that the Registrant’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long-term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Registrant.

The primary trading risk exposures of the Registrant at December 31, 2005 by market sector were:

Interest Rates: Interest rate movements directly affect the price of sovereign bond positions held by the Registrant and indirectly affect the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between countries may materially impact the Registrant’s profitability. The Registrant’s primary interest rate exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the U.S. and other G-7 countries (including countries participating in the Euro). To a lesser extent, the Registrant also takes positions in the government debt of smaller nations – e.g., Australia. The Managing Owner anticipates that G-7 interest rates will remain a primary market exposure of the Registrant in the foreseeable future. The changes in interest rates, which have the most effect on the Registrant, are changes in long-term rates as opposed to short-term rates. Most of the speculative positions held by the Registrant are in medium to long-term instruments. Consequently, a material change in short-term rates is expected to have little effect on the Registrant were the medium-term to long-term rates to remain steady.

Currencies: The Registrant’s currency exposure is due to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations that disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. These fluctuations are influenced by interest rate changes as well as political and general economic conditions. The Registrant’s major exposure has typically resulted from positions in the Euro and in local currencies of G-10 countries. These include outright, as well as, cross-rate positions – i.e., positions between two currencies other than the U.S. dollar. At December 31, 2005, the Registrant had significant exposure from positions in several G-10 currencies including the Japanese yen, the Swiss franc, the British pound, the Canadian dollar and the Euro. The Registrant also had some exposure at December 31, 2005 to the Australian dollar, the Mexican peso and the South African rand. The currency trading Value at Risk figure includes foreign margin amounts converted into U.S. dollars with an incremental adjustment to reflect the exchange rate risk inherent to the dollar-based Registrant in expressing value at Risk in a functional currency other than U.S. dollars.

Commodities: The Registrant’s primary commodities exposure is generally in the energy markets and results from gas and oil price movements, usually from global political, and supply and demand developments. The Registrant’s major energy exposure at year-end resulted from positions in crude, gas oil, natural gas and heating oil. In the metals sector, the Registrant’s risk exposure is a result of price movements due to perceptions of global growth and economic strength. The Registrant’s major metals exposure at year-end resulted from positions in copper and zinc.

Stock Indices: The Registrant’s primary equity exposure was due to equity price risk in the DAX Index, the S&P 500 Index, the Dow Jones STOXX 50 Index and the NASDAQ100 Index. The Registrant’s stock exposure is currently limited to futures on broadly based indices.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure

The means by which the Managing Owner and the Trading Advisor, severally, attempt to manage the risk of the Registrant’s open positions is essentially the same in all market categories traded.

The Trading Advisor attempts to minimize market risk exposure by applying its own risk management trading policies which include the diversification of trading assets into various market sectors. Additionally, the Trading Advisor has an oversight committee broadly responsible for evaluating and overseeing the Trading Advisor’s trading policies. The oversight committee meets periodically to discuss and analyze issues such as liquidity, position size, capacity, performance cycles, and new product and market strategies.

15

The Managing Owner attempts to minimize market risk exposure by requiring the Trading Advisor to abide by various trading limitations and policies. The Managing Owner monitors compliance with these trading limitations and policies which include, but are not limited to, limiting the amount of margin or premium required for any one commodity or all commodities combined and generally limiting transactions to contracts which are traded in sufficient volume to permit the taking and liquidating of positions. Additionally, the Managing Owner shall automatically terminate the Trading Advisor if the net asset value of the Registrant declines by 40% during any year or since the commencement of trading activities. Furthermore, the Trust Agreement provides that the Registrant will liquidate its positions, and eventually dissolve, if the Registrant experiences a decline in the net asset value of 50% in any year or since the commencement of trading activities. In each case, the decline in net asset value is after giving effect for distributions, contributions and redemptions. The Managing Owner may impose additional restrictions (through modifications of such trading limitations and policies) upon the trading activities of the Trading Advisor as it, in good faith, deems to be in the best interest of the Registrant.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure

At December 31, 2005, the Registrant’s primary exposure to non-trading market risk resulted from foreign currency balances held in the Euro, British pound, Japanese yen, Australian dollars and Canadian dollar. As discussed above, these balances, as well as any risk they represent, are immaterial.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements are incorporated by reference to pages 3 through 17 of the Registrant’s 2005 Annual Report which is filed as an exhibit hereto.

Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized below:

	For the period from January 1, 2005 to March 25, 2005			For the period from March 26, 2005 to June 24, 2005		For the period from June 25, 2005 to September 30, 2005			For the period from October 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005
Total revenues (including interest)	$	(1,327,789	)	$	5,893,769	$	107,843		$	2,092,925
Total revenues (including interest) less commissions	$	(1,894,283	)	$	5,305,058	$	(552,069	)	$	1,464,280
Net income (loss)	$	(2,173,903	)	$	5,114,469	$	(749,106	)	$	1,233,138
Net income (loss) per weighted average Interest	$	(8.13	)	$	19.77	$	(2.95	)	$	5.13

	For the period from January 1, 2004 to March 26, 2004		For the period from March 27, 2004 to June 25, 2004			For the period from June 26, 2004 to September 24, 2004			For the period from September 25, 2004 to December 31, 2004
2004:
Total revenues (including interest)	$	9,653,391	$	(4,585,536	)	$	(968,243	)	$	3,370,512
Total revenues (including interest) less commissions	$	8,894,803	$	(5,308,613	)	$	(1,596,110	)	$	2,662,879
Net income (loss)	$	6,746,987	$	(5,615,917	)	$	(1,839,554	)	$	2,314,215
Net income (loss) per weighted average Interest	$	20.19	$	(17.74	)	$	(6.29	)	$	4.43

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On October 18, 2005, the Board of Directors of Preferred dismissed Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C. (“AFB”) as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Registrant. The report of AFB on the Registrant’s financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainties, audit scope, or accounting principles. AFB was engaged by World Monitor Trust II – Series F on October 1, 2004.

16

During the Registrant’s most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and during the period from the end of the most recently completed fiscal year through the date of this Form 8-K, the Registrant and the Managing Owner have had no disagreements with AFB on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of AFB, would have caused it to make a reference to the subject matter thereof in its report on the financial statements of the Registrant for such period.

On October 18, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Managing Owner, on behalf of the Registrant, approved the engagement of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”) as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Registrant. During the Registrant’s two most recent fiscal years and the interim period prior to engaging D&T, neither the Registrant, the Managing Owner, nor anyone on their behalf consulted D&T, on behalf of the Registrant, regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction (either completed or proposed), the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Registrant’s financial statements, or any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement,” as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the instructions thereto, or a “reportable event,” as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Managing Owner carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the officers of the Managing Owner, including the Managing Owner’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer and director of fund administration, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Managing Owner’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer and director of fund administration concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d – 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fiscal quarter to which this report related that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officer of the Registrant

There are no officers of the Registrant. The Registrant is managed by the Managing Owner.

The key officers of the Managing Owner and their positions with respect to the Registrant are as follows:

Mr. Kenneth A. Shewer (born 1953), has been a principal, associated person and NFA associate member of the Managing Owner since February 8, 1984, May 1,1985 since August 1, 1985, respectively. He has been Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner since February 1984. Mr. Shewer was employed by Pasternak, Baum and Co., Inc. (“Pasternak, Baum”), an international cash commodity firm, from June 1976 until September 1983. Mr. Shewer created and managed Pasternak, Baum’s Grain Logistics and Administration Department and created its Domestic Corn and Soybean Trading Department. Mr. Shewer’s responsibilities at Pasternak, Baum included merchandising South American grain and exporting United States corn and soybeans. In 1982, Mr. Shewer became co-manager of Pasternak, Baum’s F.O.B. Corn Department. In 1983, Mr. Shewer was made Vice President and Director of Pasternak, Baum. Mr. Shewer has traveled extensively in South America and Europe in connection with the commodity business and has organized and effected grain and oilseed sales in those regions, the former Soviet Union, and the Far East. While at Pasternak, Baum, Mr. Shewer was a member of the St. Louis Merchants Exchange and was associated with the National Grain and Feed Association and the North American Export Grain Association.

Mr. Shewer graduated from Syracuse University with a B.S. degree in 1975. Mr. Shewer sits on the Board of the Stacy Joy Goodman Memorial Foundation, a non-profit charity committed to finding a cure for Juvenile Diabetes. He is also a member of the Board of the Diabetes Research Institute Foundation, a not-for-profit organization affiliated with the University of Miami School of Medicine. Mr. Shewer is a founding member and member of the Board of the Greenwich Roundtable.

Mr. Marc S. Goodman (born 1948) has been a principal, associated person and NFA associate member of the Managing Owner since February 7, 1984, May 1, 1985 since August 1, 1985, respectively. He has been President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner since February 1984. Mr. Goodman joined Pasternak, Baum in September 1974 and was a Vice President and Director from July 1981 until September 1983. While at Pasternak, Baum, Mr. Goodman was largely responsible for business development outside of the United States, for investment of its corporate retirement funds, and for selecting trading personnel in the Vegetable Oil Division Mr. Goodman also created and developed Pasternak, Baum’s Laric Oils Department. Mr. Goodman has conducted extensive business in South America, Europe and the Far East; he has been a merchandiser of all major vegetable oils and their by-products, and of various other commodities such as sunflower seeds, frozen poultry, pulses and potatoes.

17

Mr. Goodman graduated from the Bernard M. Baruch School of Business of the City University of New York with a B.B.A. in 1969 and an M.B.A. in 1971 in Finance and Investments, where he was awarded an Economics and Finance Department Fellowship from September 1969 through June 1971. Mr. Goodman is a member of the American Arbitration Association; while at Pasternak, Baum, he was a member of the National Institute of Oilseeds Products and the American Fats and Oils Association (including its Export Rules Committee).

Mr. Goodman is the Chairman of the Board of the Stacy Joy Goodman Memorial Foundation, a non-profit charity committed to finding a cure for Juvenile Diabetes. He is also Chairman of the Board of the Diabetes Research Institute Foundation, a not-for-profit organization which is the principle source of funding for the Diabetes Research Institute, a world renowned cure based research center affiliated with the University of Miami School of Medicine.

Mr. Goodman is a founding member and member of the Board of the Greenwich Roundtable and is a member of the Board of Xethanol Corp.

Messrs. Shewer and Goodman left Pasternak, Baum in September 1983 to form Kenmar Advisory Corp. (now known as Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., the Managing Owner) and they have occupied their present positions with the Managing Owner since that time.

Ms. Esther Eckerling Goodman (born 1952) has been a principal, associated person and NFA associate member of the Managing Owner since May 12, 1988, July 17, 1986 and July 17, 1986, respectively. She joined the Managing Owner in July 1986 and is its Chief Operating Officer and Senior Executive Vice President. Ms. Goodman has been involved in the futures industry since 1974. From 1974 through 1976, she was employed by Conti-Commodity Services, Inc. and ACLI Commodity Services, Inc., in the areas of hedging, speculative trading and tax arbitrage. In 1976, Ms. Goodman joined Loeb Rhoades & Company, Inc. where she was responsible for developing and managing a managed futures program which, in 1979, became the trading system for Westchester Commodity Management, an independent commodity-trading advisor of which Ms. Goodman was a founder and principal. From 1983 through mid-1986, Ms. Goodman was employed as a marketing executive at Commodities Corp. (USA) of Princeton, New Jersey. Ms. Goodman was a Director of the Managed Futures Trade Association from 1987 to 1991 and a Director of its successor organization, the Managed Futures Association, from 1991 to 1995 (now the Managed Funds Association). Ms. Goodman graduated from Stanford University with a B.A. degree in psychology in 1974.

Mr. Braxton Glasgow III (born 1953), has been a principal, associated person, branch manager and NFA associate member of the Managing Owner since June 21, 2001, June 21, 2001, July 13, 2004 and June 8, 2001, respectively. Mr. Glasgow has been an Executive Vice President of the Managing Owner since joining the Managing Owner in May 2001. Mr. Glasgow is responsible for business development. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President, Director of Client Services and a Principal at Chesapeake Capital Corp., a commodities trading firm, and as Senior Managing Director at Signet Investment Banking Co. Mr. Glasgow began his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he specialized in mergers and acquisitions and private equity, including extensive work in Europe and the Far East. Mr. Glasgow received a B.S. in Accounting from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is a Certified Public Accountant. From 1994 to 1995, he was President of the Jay Group Ltd. Mr. Glasgow received a B.S. degree in accounting from the University of North Carolina in 1975.

Ms. Maureen D. Howley (born 1967), has been a principal of the Managing Owner since August 11, 2003. She has been a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner since joining the Managing Owner in July 2003. She is responsible for corporate finance. From July 2001 until July 2003, Ms. Howley was an Associate at Andor Capital Management, LLC, an equity hedge fund company. At Andor, she was responsible for managing the corporate accounting functions. Previously, she was the Controller at John W. Henry & Company, Inc., a commodity-trading advisor (“JWH”), where she held positions of increasing responsibility from September 1996 to July 2001. She began her career at Deloitte & Touche where she specialized in the financial services industry. She held many positions of increasing responsibility for seven years, and left as an Audit Senior Manager in September 1996 to join JWH. Ms. Howley received a B.A. in Accounting from Muhlenberg College in 1989 and designation as a Certified Public Accountant in 1990.

Mr. Lawrence S. Block (born 1967) has been a Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Managing Owner since joining the Managing Owner in March 2005. Prior to joining the Managing Owner, Mr. Block was a Managing Director and General Counsel of Lipper & Company, L.P., a New York-based investment management firm, from January 1998 until March 2005. Prior to joining Lipper & Company, Mr. Block was a senior associate at the law firm Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft in New York from May 1996 through December 1997. Mr. Block also worked as an associate at the law firm Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn from September 1992 through May 1996. Mr. Block received a B.S. in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1989 and a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania School of Law in 1992. Mr. Block’s registration as a principal of the Managing Owner has been effective since March 17, 2005. His registration as an Associated Person of the Managing Owner is pending with the National Futures Association.

18

Ms. Joanne D. Rosenthal (born 1965), has been a principal, associated person and NFA associate member of the Managing Owner since February 29, 2000, February 29, 2000 and November 30, 1999, respectively. Ms. Rosenthal is Senior Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management and Implementation for the Managing Owner. Prior to joining the Managing Owner in October 1999, Ms. Rosenthal spent nine years at The Chase Manhattan Bank, in various positions of increasing responsibility. From July 1991 through April 1994, she managed the Trade Execution Desk and from May 1994 through September 1999, she was a Vice President and Senior Portfolio Manager of Chase Alternative Asset Management, Inc. Ms. Rosenthal received a Masters of Business Administration with a concentration in Finance from Cornell University and a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from Concordia University in Montreal, Canada.

Mr. Peter J. Fell (born 1960), Senior Vice President, Director of Due Diligence since joining the Managing Owner in September 2004. He is responsible for manager selection and due diligence. Mr. Fell is a member of the Investment Committee. From 2000 through August 2004, Mr. Fell was a founding partner and Investment Director of Starview Capital Management. Prior to co-founding Starview Capital Management, Mr. Fell was Vice President of Research and Product Development at Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc (MLIP). He was responsible for the investment evaluation and recommendation process pertaining to MLIP funds and sat on MLIP’s Investment Committee. Prior to joining MLIP, Mr. Fell had been with Deutsche Bank Financial Products Corporation for six years starting in 1989, where he was Vice President in the over-the-counter fixed income derivatives area. From 1985 to 1989, he was employed by Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, ultimately holding the position of Assistant Vice President in the Swaps and Futures Group. Mr. Fell holds an A.B. cum laude in Music Theory and History and an M.B.A. in Finance from Columbia University.

Ms. Melissa Cohn (born 1960), Vice President and Senior Research Analyst, joined the Managing Owner in 1988. Her responsibilities include manager due diligence, manager analysis, and portfolio/risk management. Ms. Cohn has been involved in the futures industry for over 20 years. Prior to joining the Managing Owner, she spent six years in positions of increasing responsibility in the Commodities Division at Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc. Her experience includes that of Sales Assistant, Assistant Commodity Trader and Trader executing orders from numerous CTAs that traded through Shearson. Ms. Cohn graduated from the University of Wisconsin Madison with a B.S. in Agriculture in 1982.

Mr. James Dodd (born 1951), has been a principal, associated person and NFA associate member of the Managing Owner since February 26, 2002, February 26, 2002 and January 25, 2002, respectively. He is responsible for structuring and marketing investment products to financial institutions and to retail investors via the brokerage and financial consultant channels. Earlier in his career, Mr. Dodd was a senior marketing officer of the Capital Markets Group of Continental Bank in Chicago; President of Signet Investment Banking in Richmond, Virginia; and Managing Director of Financial Institutions Marketing at Chesapeake Capital, a large Richmond-based CTA. Mr. Dodd received an AB degree from Cornell University in 1974 and a M.B.A. degree from the University of Chicago in 1983.

Ms. Florence Y. Sofer (born 1966), has been a principal of the Managing Owner since February 28, 2002. She has been Vice President, Investor Relations/ Communications of the Managing Owner since joining the Managing Owner in November 2001. From 1997 to 2001, Ms. Sofer was the Vice President, Marketing, and a Principal of JWH, where she was responsible for strategic marketing and client communications for the firm and its subsidiaries. From 1994 to 1997, Ms. Sofer was the Marketing Manager at Global Asset Management (“GAM”) where she was involved in the successful development and launch the firm’s mutual fund product line. Ms. Sofer received a B.A. degree from American University in 1988 and a M.B.A. in Marketing from George Washington University in 1992.

Mr. David K. Spohr (born 1963), Vice President and Director of Fund Administration joined the Managing Owner in 2005. He is responsible for the development and execution of the administration group support responsibilities. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Spohr was a Vice President at Safra Group, where he was responsible for the Alternative Investment operations, tax reporting and pricing valuation. From 2000 to 2002, he was a consultant to The Safra Group. From 1994-1999, he was Manager of Investment Services for the Bank of Bermuda, supporting private client transactions. From 1993 to 1994, he was the Manager of Global Operations for Highbridge Capital Corporation during the fund’s infancy. Mr. Spohr received a B.S. in Business Economics from The State University of New York College at Oneonta in 1985 and designation as a Chartered Financial Analyst in 1998.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Certain of the Managing Owner’s directors and officers and any persons holding more than ten percent of the Registrant’s Limited Interests (“Ten Percent Owners”) are required to report their initial ownership of such Limited Interests and any subsequent changes in that ownership to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on Forms 3, 4 or 5. Such directors and officers and Ten Percent Owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Registrant with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file. There are no Ten Percent Owners of the Registrant’s Limited Interests. Each of Lawrence S. Block and David K. Spohr failed to timely file an Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities on Form 3 during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal year. Other than as set forth above, all filing requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were timely complied with during the fiscal year. In making these disclosures, the Registrant has relied solely on written representations of the Managing Owner’s directors and officers and the Registrant’s Ten Percent Owners or copies of the reports that they have filed with the SEC during and with respect to its most recent fiscal year.

19

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Registrant itself does not have any employees. Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. acts as Managing Owner of the Registrant. The Board of Directors of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. has delegated audit committee responsibilities to the Internal Controls and Disclosure Committee. Maureen Howley, as the Chief Financial Officer of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. and as a member of the Internal Controls and Disclosure Committee, serves as the “audit committee financial expert” for Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. Ms. Howley is not a member of the Board of Directors and she is not independent of management.

Code of Ethics

Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. has adopted a code of ethics for its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, director of fund administration, accounting managers and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the code of ethics may be obtained at no charge by written request to Preferred Investment, 900 King Street, Suite 100, Rye Brook, New York 10573 or by calling (914) 307-7000.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The Registrant does not pay or accrue any fees, salaries or any other form of compensation to officers of the Managing Owner for their services. (See also Item 13, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, for information regarding compensation to the Managing Owner.)

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Interest Holder Matters

As of March 10, 2006, Preferred maintains a 1% Managing Owner Interest in the Registrant. As of March 10, 2006, all of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. stock is owned indirectly and equally by Messrs. Goodman and Shewer, Preferred’s sole directors.

As of March 10, 2006, the following officers of the Managing Owner are deemed to own beneficially the following number of interests issued by the Registrant:

Title of Class	Name and Addresses of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class
Managing Owner interests	Marc S. Goodman 900 King Street, Suite 100 Rye Brook, New York 10573	2,408 Managing Owner interests (*)	100%
Managing Owner interests	Kenneth A. Shewer 900 King Street, Suite 100 Rye Brook, New York 10573	2,408 Managing Owner interests (*)	100%
Managing Owner interests	Esther E. Goodman 900 King Street, Suite 100 Rye Brook, New York 10573	2,408 Managing Owner interests (**)	100%

(*) These interests are held indirectly through Preferred. The Beneficial Owner disclaims beneficial ownership over such securities for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(**) These interests are held by the Beneficial Owner’s spouse indirectly through Preferred. The Beneficial Owner disclaims beneficial ownership over such securities for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent of her pecuniary interest therein.

As of March 10, 2006, no partner beneficially owns more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding limited interests issued by the Registrant.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The Registrant has and will continue to have certain relationships with the Managing Owner and its affiliates. However, there have been no direct financial transactions between the Registrant and the directors or officers of the Managing Owner.

Reference is made to Notes 1, 3 and 4 to the financial statements in the Registrant’s 2005 Annual Report which is filed as an exhibit hereto, which identify the related parties and discuss the services provided by these parties and the amounts paid or payable for their services.

20

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Audit Fees and All Other Fees

The principle accountant for the year ended December 31, 2005 was Deloitte & Touche LLP. The principle accountant for the year ended December 31, 2004 was Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C.

Audit Fees

Fees for audit services totaled approximately $56,000 for 2005 ($45,000 to Deloitte & Touche LLP and $11,000 to Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C.) and $28,000 during 2004, respectively, including fees associated with the annual audit and the reviews of the Registrant’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

Tax

Fees for tax services by Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C, including tax compliance and tax advice totaled approximately $7,000 and $6,500 in 2005 and 2004, respectively.

We have been advised by Deloitte & Touche LLP that neither the firm, nor any member of the firm, has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in any capacity in the Registrant or its affiliates.

PART IV

		Page in Annual Report
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a)     1.	Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 2005 Annual Report which is filed as an exhibit hereto
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Deloitte & Touche LLP	1
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C.	2
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP	3
	Financial Statements:
	Statements of Financial Condition – December 31, 2005 and 2004	4
	Condensed Schedules of Investments – At December 31, 2005 and 2004	5
	Statements of Operations – Three years ended December 31, 2005	6
	Statements of Changes in Trust Capital – Three years ended December 31, 2005	7
	Notes to Financial Statements	8 – 18
2.	Financial Statement Schedules
	All schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or the notes thereto
3.	Exhibits
(a)	Description:

21

4.1	Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust Agreement of World Monitor Trust dated as of October 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference)
4.2	Form of Request for Redemption (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-83017, filed on April 2, 2002)
4.3	Form of Exchange Request (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-83017, filed on April 2, 2002)
4.4	Form of Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-83017, filed on April 2, 2002)
10.1	Form of Escrow Agreement among the Trust, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc., Chase Manhattan Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-83017, filed on September 17, 1999)
10.2	Form of Brokerage Agreement between the Trust and PSI (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-83017, filed on of September 17, 1999)
10.3	Form of Advisory Agreement among the Registrant, Managing Owner, and the Trading Advisor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-83017, filed on of July 16, 1999)
10.4	Form of Representation Agreement Concerning the Registration Statement and the Prospectus among the Registrant, Managing Owner, PSI, Wilmington Trust Company and the Trading Advisor, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statements on Form S-1, File No. 333-83017, filed on of September 17, 1999)
10.5	Form of Net Worth Agreement between the Managing Owner and Prudential Securities Group Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form S-1, File No. 333-83017, filed on of September 17, 1999)
10.6	Service Agreement among the Registrant, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. and Wachovia Securities, LLC dated as of July 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Registrant’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K)
10.7	Novation letter among the Trust, Trading Advisor and Managing Owner dated September 14, 2004 (filed herewith)
10.8	Letter Agreement Amending and Restating Brokerage Agreement between the Managing Owner and Prudential Financial Derivatives, LLC dated October 1, 2004 (filed herewith)
10.9	Advisory Agreement among the Managing Owner, WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. and Campbell & Company, Inc. dated November 3, 2004 (filed herewith)
13.1	Registrant’s 2005 Annual Report (with the exception of the information and data incorporated by reference in Items 5, 7 and 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, no other information or data appearing in the Registrant’s 2005 Annual Report is to be deemed filed as part of this report) (filed herewith)
31.1	Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 (filed herewith)
31.2	Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 (filed herewith)
31.3	Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 (filed herewith)
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
32.3	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
(b)	Reports on Form 8-K – Change of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated October 18, 2005 (incorporated by reference)

22

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 31^st day of March, 2006.

	WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F
By:	Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.
	Managing Owner
	By: /s/ Maureen D. Howley	Date: March 31, 2006
	Maureen D. Howley
	Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities indicated on March 31, 2006.

	WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F
By:	Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.
	Managing Owner
	By: /s/ Kenneth A. Shewer	Date: March 31, 2006
	Kenneth A. Shewer
	Co-Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)
	By: /s/ Maureen D. Howley	Date: March 31, 2006
	Maureen D. Howley
	Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer for the Trust)
	By: /s/ David K. Spohr	Date: March 31, 2006
	David K. Spohr
	Vice President and Director of Fund Administration

OTHER INFORMATION

The actual round-turn equivalent of brokerage commissions paid per contract for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $8.72.

Series F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is available to limited owners without charge upon written request to:

World Monitor Trust II – Series F

c/o Preferred Investment Solutions Corp

900 King Street, Suite 100

Rye Brook, NY 10573

EX-13.1

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

ANNUAL REPORT

December 31, 2005

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

The financial statements are comprised of Section I, containing the financial statements of World Monitor Trust II – Series F as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, and Section II, containing the financial statements of WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the year ending December 31, 2005 and the period December 6, 2004 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2004.

SECTION I

	PAGES
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Deloitte & Touche LLP	1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C.	2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP	3
Financial Statements
Statements of Financial Condition	4
Condensed Schedules of Investments	5
Statements of Operations	6
Statements of Changes in Trust Capital	7
Notes to Financial Statements	8 - 19

SECTION II

Financial statements of WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. as of

December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the year ending December 31, 2005 and

the period December 6, 2004 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2004.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Managing Owner and Limited Owners of

World Monitor Trust II – Series F

We have audited the accompanying statement of financial condition, including the condensed schedule of investments, of World Monitor Trust II Series F (the “Trust”) as of December 31, 2005, and the related statements of operations and changes in Unitholders’ capital for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, including the condensed schedule of investments for 2004, were audited by other auditors whose reports dated March 25, 2005 and January 23, 2004, respectively, expressed unqualified opinions on those statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the 2005 financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Trust at December 31, 2005, and the results of its operations and changes in Unitholders’ capital for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 29, 2006

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Managing Owner and Limited Owners of

World Monitor Trust II – Series F

We have audited the accompanying statement of financial condition of World Monitor Trust II – Series F as of December 31, 2004, including the December 31, 2004 condensed schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations and changes in trust capital for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of World Monitor Trust II – Series F as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and changes in its trust capital for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C.

Hunt Valley, Maryland

March 25, 2005

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Managing Owner and Limited Owners of

World Monitor Trust II – Series F

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of financial condition, including the condensed schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations and changes in trust capital present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of World Monitor Trust II – Series F at December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and changes in its trust capital for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Managing Owner; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Managing Owner, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York

January 23, 2004

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

December 31, 2005 and 2004

	2005		2004
ASSETS
Cash in commodity trading accounts	$	405,744	$	207,960
Net unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contacts Investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (99.57% and 100.01% of net asset value, respectively)		0 36,596,444		(14,245 38,915,521	)
Redemption receivable from WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.		279,989		253,805
Total assets	$	37,282,177	$	39,363,041
LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses	$	72,190	$	168,833
Commissions and other transaction fees payable		224,437		229,374
Incentive fee payable		1,631		0
Management fee payable		0		15,470
Redemption payable		228,956		38,804
Total liabilities		527,214		452,481
TRUST CAPITAL
Limited interests (231,089.673 and 267,999.193 interests outstanding) at December 31, 2005 and 2004		36,375,919		38,509,087
Managing Owner interests (2,408 and 2,794 interests outstanding) at December 31, 2005 and 2004		379,044		401,473
Total trust capital		36,754,963		38,910,560
Total liabilities and trust capital	$	37,282,177	$	39,363,041

See accompanying notes.

-5-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

CONDENSED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS

December 31, 2005 and 2004

	2005				2004
Futures Contracts	Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) as a % of Trust Capital		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) as a % of Trust Capital		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Futures contracts purchased:
Commodities	0.00	%	$	0	0.04	%	$	15,155
Currencies	0.00	%		0	0.00	%		0
Interest rates	0.00	%		0	0.00	%		0
Stock indices	0.00	%		0	0.00	%		0
Net unrealized gain on futures contracts purchased	0.00	%		0	0.04	%		15,155
Futures contracts sold:
Commodities	0.00	%		0	(0.08	)%	$	(29,400	)
Currencies	0.00	%		0	0.00	%		0
Interest rates	0.00	%		0	0.00	%		0
Net unrealized (loss) on futures contracts sold	0.00	%		0	(0.08	)%		(29,400	)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on futures contracts	0.00	%	$	0	(0.04	)%	$	(14,245	)

See accompanying notes.

-6-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

	2005			2004			2003
NET INCOME FROM TRUST OPERATIONS:
REVENUES
Realized	$	(13,519	)	$	9,843,539		$	7,670,051
Change in unrealized		14,245			(2,187,012	)		1,329,062
Interest income		9,818			536,027			404,652
Total revenues		10,544			8,192,554			9,403,765
EXPENSES
Brokerage commissions and other transaction fees		2,258,446			2,793,900			2,530,623
Management fees		0			832,901			814,398
Incentive fees		1,631			1,869,690			1,113,425
General and administrative		145,873			284,658			135,814
Total expenses		2,405,950			5,781,149			4,594,260
NET INCOME FROM TRUST OPERATIONS		(2,395,406	)		2,411,405			4,809,505
NET INCOME/(LOSS) ALLOCATED FROM WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.:
REVENUES
Realized		6,205,301			(150,540	)		0
Change in unrealized		(620,885	)		(609,080	)		0
Interest income		1,171,788			37,190			0
Total revenues		6,756,204			(722,430	)		0
EXPENSES
Brokerage commissions and other transaction fees		185,316			23,265			0
Management fee		750,884			59,979			0
Total expenses		936,200			83,244			0
NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATED FROM WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.		5,820,004			(805,674	)		0
NET INCOME	$	3,424,598		$	1,605,731		$	4,809,505
NET INCOME PER WEIGHTED AVERAGE LIMITED AND MANAGING OWNER INTEREST
Net income per weighted average limited and Managing Owner interest	$	13.48		$	5.31		$	15.90
Weighted average number of limited and Managing Owner interests outstanding		253,984			302,585			302,407

See accompanying notes.

-7-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TRUST CAPITAL

For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

	Interests		Limited Interests			Managing Owner Interests			Total
Trust capital at December 31, 2002	190,722.991		$	22,420,673		$	230,402		$	22,651,075
Contributions	188,246.340			24,857,209			226,491			25,083,700
Redemptions	(40,407.022	)		(5,362,718	)		(34,304	)		(5,397,022	)
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2003				4,760,155			49,350			4,809,505
Trust capital at December 31, 2003	338,562.309			46,675,319			471,939			47,147,258
Redemptions	(67,769.116	)		(9,755,584	)		(86,845	)		(9,842,429	)
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2004				1,589,352			16,379			1,605,731
Trust capital at December 31, 2004	270,793.193			38,509,087			401,473			38,910,560
Contributions	52.464			8,642			0			8,642
Redemptions	(37,347.984	)		(5,529,361	)		(59,476	)		(5,588,837	)
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2005				3,387,551			37,047			3,424,598
Trust capital at December 31, 2005	233,497.673		$	36,375,919		$	379,044		$	36,754,963

Net Asset Value per Limited and Managing Owner Interest
December 31,
2005		2004		2003
$	157.41	$	143.69	$	139.26

See accompanying notes.

-8-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. ORGANIZATION

A. General Description of the Trust

World Monitor Trust II – (the “Trust”) is a business trust organized under the laws of Delaware on April 22, 1999. The Trust consists of three separate and distinct series (“Series”): Series D, E and F. Series D, E and F commenced trading operations on March 13, 2000, April 6, 2000 and March 1, 2000, respectively, and each Series will continue to exist until terminated pursuant to the provisions of Article XIII of the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement (the “Agreement”). The assets of each Series are segregated from those of the other Series, separately valued and independently managed. Each Series was formed to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of futures, forward and options contracts and may, from time to time, engage in cash and spot transactions. The trustee of the Trust is Wilmington Trust Company.

On July 1, 2003, Prudential Financial, Inc. (“Prudential”) and Wachovia Corp. (“Wachovia”) combined their separate retail securities brokerage and clearing businesses under a new holding company named Wachovia/Prudential Financial Advisors, LLC (“WPFA”), owned 62% by Wachovia and 38% by Prudential. As a result, the retail brokerage operations of Prudential Securities Incorporated (“PSI”) were contributed to Wachovia Securities, LLC (“Wachovia Securities”). Wachovia Securities is wholly-owned by WPFA and is a registered broker-dealer and a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) and all major securities exchanges. Series F and its Managing Owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PSI, entered into a service agreement with Wachovia Securities, effective July 1, 2003. Pursuant to this agreement, Wachovia Securities agreed to provide certain enumerated services to accounts of the limited interest owners carried at Wachovia.

Effective July 1, 2003, PSI changed its name to Prudential Equity Group, Inc. (“PEG”). PEG remained an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential. PEG was a registered broker-dealer and a member of the NASD and all major securities exchanges and conducted the equity research, domestic and international equity sales and trading operations, and commodity brokerage and derivative operations it had previously conducted as PSI until December 31, 2003. As part of the process of reorganizing its business structure, Prudential Securities Group Inc. (“PSG”), the direct parent of PEG and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential, transferred the commodity brokerage, commodity clearing and derivative operations previously performed by PEG to another PSG indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Prudential Financial Derivatives, LLC (“PFD”) effective January 1, 2004. Like PEG, PFD is registered as a futures commission merchant under the Commodity Exchange Act and is a member of the National Futures Association. On April 1, 2004, PEG transferred the ownership of the Managing Owner and PFD Holdings, LLC, the direct parent of PFD, to PSG.

-9-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 1. ORGANIZATION (CONTINUED)

A. General Description of the Trust (continued)

On June 30, 2004, PSG and Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., formerly Kenmar Advisory Corp. (“Preferred”), entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which PSG would sell, and Preferred would buy, all of the capital stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the then current Managing Owner of Series F) and another commodity pool operator owned by PSG. In connection with the transaction, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. solicited proxies seeking approval from the Series F interest holders for (i) the sale of the stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. to Preferred; (ii) the concomitant approval of Preferred as the new Managing Owner of Series F; and (iii) the approval of certain amendments to the Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement of the Trust. A Report on Form 8-K describing the transaction was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2004 and the definitive proxies were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 20, 2004.

As of October 1, 2004, Preferred acquired from PSG all of the outstanding stock of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. Immediately after such acquisition, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. was merged with and into Preferred. Accordingly, as of October 1, 2004 all of the board of directors and officers of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. resigned. Following Preferred’s acquisition of Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. and its merger with and into Preferred, Preferred became the successor Managing Owner of Series F.

The term Managing Owner, as used herein, refers either to Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. or Preferred, depending upon the applicable period discussed.

Effective December 6, 2004, Series F contributed its net assets to WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “Company”) and received a Voting Membership Interest in the Company. The Company was formed to function as an aggregate trading vehicle. The sole members of the Company are Series F and World Monitor Trust – Series A (“Series A”). Preferred is the Managing Owner of Series A and has been delegated administrative authority over the operations of the Company. The Company engages in the speculative trading of futures and forwards contracts. The financial statements of the Company, including the condensed schedule of investments, are included in Section II of these financial statements and should be used in conjunction with Series F’s financial statements.

B. Regulation

As a registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Trust is subject to the regulatory requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a commodity pool, the Trust is subject to the regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, an agency of the United States (U.S.) government which regulates most aspects of the commodity futures industry; rules of the National Futures Association, an industry self-regulatory organization; and the requirements of the various commodity exchanges where the Trust executes transactions. Additionally, the Trust is subject to the requirements of the futures commission merchants (brokers) and interbank market makers through which the Trust trades.

-10-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 1. ORGANIZATION (CONTINUED)

C. The Offering

Up to $50,000,000 of Limited Interests in each Series (“Limited Interests”) were being offering (totaling $150,000,000) (“Subscription Maximum”), until each Series’ Subscription Maximum was met either through sale or exchange or until the Managing Owner suspended the offering of Limited Interests as discussed below. Interests were offered to investors who met certain established suitability standards, with a minimum initial subscription of $5,000 ($2,000 for an individual retirement account), although the minimum purchase for any single Series is $1,000. General Interests were sold exclusively to the Managing Owner. Limited Interests and General Interests are sometimes referred to as “Interests”.

Initially, the Limited Interests for each Series were offered for a period of up to 180 days after the date of the Prospectus (“Initial Offering Period”) at $100 per Interest. The subscription minimum of $5,000,000 for each Series was reached during the Initial Offering Period permitting Series D, E and F to commence trading operations. Series F completed its initial offering March 1, 2000 with gross proceeds of $5,185,012, which was fully allocated to commodities trading. Series E and F’s interests were offered until they substantially achieved their subscription maximum of $50,000,000 on the sale of Limited Interests during June 2003 and July 2003, respectively. In addition, since July 2003, the weekly offering of interests in Series D has been suspended. Accordingly, at this time, interests may not be offered or exchanged. During 2005, the Managing Owner redeemed 52.464 Interests in excess of the redemption request, which were subsequently re-issued to the limited interest holder.

The Managing Owner is required to maintain at least 1% interest in the capital, profits and losses of each Series so long as it is acting as the Managing Owner, and it will make such contribution (and in return receive general interests) as are necessary to meet this requirement.

D. The Trading Advisor

Each Series has its own independent commodity trading advisor that makes that Series’ trading decisions. The Managing Owner, on behalf of Series F, entered into an advisory agreement with Campbell & Company, Inc. (the “Trading Advisor”) to make the trading decisions for Series F. The Managing Owner allocated 100% of the proceeds from the initial and continuous offering of Series F to the Trading Advisor.

Effective December 6, 2004, the Managing Owner terminated the advisory agreement with the Trading Advisor concurrent with Series F’s investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.

-11-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 1. ORGANIZATION (CONTINUED)

E. Exchanges, Redemptions and Termination

Interests owned in one series of the Trust (Series D, E and F) may be exchanged, without any charge, for Interests of one or more other Series on a weekly basis for as long as Limited Interests in those Series are being offered to the public. Exchanges are made at the applicable Series’ then current net asset value per Interest as of the close of business on the Friday immediately preceding the week in which the exchange request is effected. The exchange of Interests is treated as a redemption of Interests in one Series (with the related tax consequences) and the simultaneous purchase of Interests in the other Series. Series E and Series F are no longer offered to the public as those series substantially achieved their subscription maximums during June 2003 and July 2003, respectively. In addition, since July 2003, the offering of interests in Series D has been temporarily suspended, as further discussed in Note A. Accordingly, at this time, interests may not be exchanged. Future redemptions and exchanges will impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contracts in subsequent periods.

Redemptions are permitted on a weekly basis. Limited Interests redeemed on or before the end of the first and second successive six-month periods after their effective dates of purchase were subject to a redemption fee of 4% and 3%, respectively, of the net asset value at which they were redeemed. Redemption fees are paid to the Managing Owner.

In the event that the estimated net asset value per Interest of a Series at the end of any business day, after adjustments for distributions, declines by 50% or more since the commencement of trading activities or the first day of a fiscal year, the Series will automatically terminate.

Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A. Basis of Accounting

The financial statements of Series F are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Such principles require the Managing Owner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Commodity futures and forward transactions are reflected in the accompanying statements of financial condition on trade date. Net unrealized gain or loss on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) is reflected in the statement of financial condition in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 39 – “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.” The market value of each contract is based upon the closing quotation on the exchange, clearing firm or bank on, or through, which the contract is traded. Any change in net unrealized gain or loss during the current period is reported in the statement of operations. Realized gains and losses on commodity transactions are recognized in the period in which the contracts are closed.

-12-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

A. Basis of Accounting (Continued)

The weighted average number of Limited and General Interests outstanding was computed for purposes of disclosing net income (loss) per weighted average Limited and General Interest. The weighted average Limited and General Interests are equal to the number of Interests outstanding at period end, adjusted proportionately for Interests subscribed and redeemed based on their respective time outstanding during such period.

Series F has elected not to provide a Statement of Cash Flows as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 102, “Statement of Cash Flows- Exemption of Certain Enterprises and Classification of Cash Flows from Certain Securities Acquired for Resale.”

Consistent with standard business practices in the normal course of business, Series F has provided general indemnifications to the Managing Owner, its Trading Advisor and others when they act, in good faith, in the best interests of Series F. Series F is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that could potentially result from any hypothetical future claim, but expects the risk of having to make any payments under these general business indemnifications to be remote.

Cash represents amounts deposited with clearing brokers, a portion of which are restricted for purposes of meeting margin requirements, which typically range from 0% to 35% of the notional amounts of the derivatives traded, and receives interest on all cash balances held by the clearing brokers at prevailing rates.

B. Income Taxes

Series F is treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. As such, Series F is not required to provide for, or pay, any Federal or state income taxes. Income tax attributes that arise from its operations are passed directly to the individual Interest holders including the Managing Owner. Series F may be subject to other state and local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates.

C. Investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.

The investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. is reported in Series F’s statement of financial condition at the net asset value as reported by the Company. Series F records its proportionate share of the Company’s income or loss in the statement of operations. Valuation of futures contracts by the Company is discussed in the notes to the Company’s financial statements included in Section II of this report.

D. Profit and Loss Allocations and Distributions

Series F allocates profits and losses for both financial and tax reporting purposes to its Interest holders weekly on a pro rata basis based on each owner’s Interests outstanding during the week. Distributions (other than redemptions of Interests) may be made at the sole discretion of the Managing Owner on a pro rata basis in accordance with the respective capital balances of the Interest holders. The Managing Owner does not presently intend to make any distributions.

-13-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

E. Foreign Currency Transaction

Series F’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar; however, it transacts business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other then the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect at the date of the statement of financial condition. Income and expense items denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect during the period. Gains and losses resulting from the translation to U.S. dollars are reported in income currently.

Note 3. FEES

A. Organizational and General and Administrative Costs

PEG or its affiliates paid the costs of organizing Series F and offering its Limited Interests and continued to pay the administrative costs incurred by the Managing Owner or its affiliates for services they performed for Series F through September 30, 2004. For the period October 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004, Preferred paid all administrative costs for services it performed for Series F. Under the WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. Organization Agreement, Preferred may allocate administrative costs of the Company to Series F. Administrative costs include, but are not limited to, those costs discussed in Note 4 below.

Routine legal, audit, postage, and other routine third party administrative costs are paid by Series F. To the extent that general and administrative costs incurred by Series F exceed 1.5% of Series F’s net asset value during the year (with a maximum of 0.5% attributable to other than legal and audit expenses) such amounts will be borne by the Managing Owner and its affiliates.

B. Management and Incentive Fees

Prior to December 6, 2004, Series F paid its Trading Advisor a management fee at an annual rate of 2% of Series F’s net asset value allocated to its management. The management fee is determined weekly and the sum of such weekly amounts is paid monthly. Prior to December 6, 2004, Series F also paid its Trading Advisor a quarterly incentive fee equal to 22% of such Trading Advisor’s “New High Net Trading Profits” (as defined in the advisory agreement).

Effective with Series F’s investment in the Company on December 6, 2004, Series F is allocated its proportionate share of the Company’s management fees on a pro rata basis based on Series F’s pro rata capital in the Company. Incentive fees are based on each partners profit and loss, net of any loss carry forward, at each partners respective fund level.

C. Commissions

Prior to January 1, 2004, Prudential Securities Futures Management, Inc. as Managing Owner, and the Trust entered into a brokerage agreement with PEG to act as commodity broker for each Series whereby Series F pays a fixed fee for brokerage services rendered at an annual rate of 6% of Series F’s net asset value. The fee is determined weekly and the sum of such weekly amounts is paid monthly. Series F is also obligated to pay all floor brokerage expenses, give-up charges and NFA, clearing and exchange fees incurred in connection with Series F’s commodity trading activities.

-14-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 3. FEES (CONTINUED)

C. Commissions (Continued)

On January 1, 2004, PEG, a wholly owned subsidiary of PSG, transferred its Global Derivatives Division to PFD and Pru Global Securities, LLC, two other indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of PSG. In connection with this transfer, PEG assigned its brokerage agreement with Series F to PFD, a properly qualified futures commission merchant.

On October 1, 2004, an agreement was executed between Preferred and PFD which amended and restated the brokerage commissions which were previously paid to PFD, excluding transaction fees which will be paid to PFD. The agreement incorporates the previous PFD brokerage agreement’s terms, including the total fees paid by Series F.

Effective with Series F’s investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. on December 6, 2004, Series F is allocated its proportionate share of the Company’s PFD transaction based fees on a pro rata basis based on Series F’s pro rata capital in the Company. Series F continues to pay a fixed fee equal to 6% of its net asset value directly to the Managing Owner.

Note 4. RELATED PARTIES

Prior to October 1, 2004, Series F reimbursed the Managing Owner or its affiliates for services they performed for Series F which included, but were not limited to: brokerage services; accounting and financial management; registrar, transfer and assignment functions; investor communications, printing and other administrative services. However, to the extent that general and administrative expenses exceeded 1.5% of Series F’s net asset value during the year (with a maximum of 0.5% attributable to other than legal and audit expenses) such amounts were borne by the Managing Owner and its affiliates. Additionally, PEG or its affiliates paid the costs associated with offering Series F’s and all the costs of offering its Limited Interests.

The expenses incurred by Series F for services performed by the Managing Owner and its affiliates for Series F were:

	2005		2004		2003
Commissions	$	2,255,022	$	2,659,997	$	2,425,900
General and administrative		16,311		181,984		71,466
	$	2,271,333	$	2,841,981	$	2,497,366

Expenses payable to the Managing Owner and its affiliates (which are included in accrued expenses) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 were $224,437 and $229,374, respectively.

-15-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 4. RELATED PARTIES (CONTINUED)

All of the proceeds of the offering of Series F were received in the name of Series F and were deposited in trading or cash accounts at PEG. Prior to January 1, 2004, Series F’s assets were maintained with PEG for margin purposes and PEG credited Series F monthly with 100% of the interest earned on the average net assets in Series F’s account. Effective January 1, 2004, Series F’s assets are maintained with PFD and PFD credits Series F monthly with 100% of the interest it earns on the average net assets in Series F’s account.

Series F, acting through its investment in the Trading Vehicle, may execute over-the-counter, spot, forward and/or option foreign exchange transactions with its broker (PEG through December 31, 2003, PFD effective January 1, 2004). The respective broker engages in back-to-back trading with an affiliate, Prudential-Bache Global Markets Inc. (“PBGM”). PBGM attempts to earn a profit on such transactions. PBGM keeps its prices on foreign currency competitive with other interbank currency trading desks. Prior to December 6, 2004, over-the-counter currency transactions were conducted between PFD and Series F pursuant to a line of credit.

Note 5. INVESTMENT IN WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

Effective December 6, 2004, Series F invested a substantial portion of its assets in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. Series F’s investment in the Company represents approximately 94% and 93% of the net asset value of the Company at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The investment in the Company is subject to the Organization Agreement of the Company.

Summarized information for this investment is as follows:

	Net Asset Value January 1, 2005		Investments		Gain/ (Loss)			Redemption			Net Asset Value December 31, 2005
WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.	$	38,915,521	$	0	$	5,820,004		$	(8,139,081	)	$	36,596,444
	Net Asset Value January 1, 2004		Investments		(Loss)			Redemption			Net Asset Value December 31, 2004
WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.	$	0	$	39,975,000	$	(805,674	)	$	(253,805	)	$	38,915,521

Series F may make additional contributions to, or redemptions from, the Company on a weekly basis.

Note 6. INCOME TAXES

There have been no differences between the tax basis and book basis of Interest holders’ capital since inception of the Trust.

Note 7. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS

Series F is exposed to various types of risks associated with the derivative instruments and related markets in which it invests as well as through its investment in WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. These risks include, but are not limited to, risk of loss from fluctuations in the value of derivative instruments held (market risk) and the inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of Series F’s investment activities (credit risk).

-16-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 7. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS (CONTINUED)

Market Risk

Trading in futures and forward contracts (including foreign exchange) involves entering into contractual commitments to purchase or sell a particular commodity at a specified date and price. The gross or face amount of the contracts, which is typically many times that of Series F’s net assets being traded, significantly exceeds Series F’s future cash requirements since Series F intends to close out its open positions prior to settlement. As a result, Series F is generally subject only to the risk of loss arising from the change in the value of the contracts. As such, Series F considers the “fair value” of its derivative instruments to be the net unrealized gain or loss on the contracts. The market risk associated with Series F’s commitments to purchase commodities is limited to the gross or face amount of the contracts held. However, when Series F enters into a contractual commitment to sell commodities, it must make delivery of the underlying commodity at the contract price and then repurchase the contracts at prevailing market prices or settle in cash. Since the repurchase price to which a commodity can rise is unlimited, entering into commitments to sell commodities exposes Series F to unlimited risk.

Market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including government programs and policies, political and economic events, the level and volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, the diversification effect among the derivative instruments Series F holds and the liquidity and inherent volatility of the markets in which Series F trades.

Credit Risk

When entering into futures or forward contracts, Series F is exposed to credit risk that the counterparty to the contract will not meet its obligations. The counterparty for futures contracts traded on United States and most foreign futures exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with the particular exchange. In general, the clearinghouse is backed by their corporate members who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members (i.e., some foreign exchanges), it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions. On the other hand, there is concentration risk on forward transactions, entered into by Series F as Series F’s commodity broker (as defined in Note 4), is the sole counterparty. Series F has entered into a master netting agreement with its broker and, as a result, when applicable, presents unrealized gains and losses on open forward positions as a net amount in the statements of financial condition. The amount at risk associated with counterparty non-performance of all of Series F’s contracts is the net unrealized gain included in the statements of financial condition; however, counterparty non-performance on only certain of Series F’s contracts may result in greater loss than non-performance on all of Series F’s contracts. There can be no assurance that any counterparty, clearing member or clearinghouse will meet its obligations to Series F.

-17-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 7. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS (CONTINUED)

Credit Risk (Continued)

The Managing Owner attempts to minimize both credit and market risks by requiring Series F and the Trading Advisor of WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. to abide by various trading limitations and policies. The Managing Owner monitors compliance with these trading limitations and policies, which include, but are not limited to, executing and clearing all trades with creditworthy counterparties; limiting the amount of margin or premium required for any one commodity or all commodities combined; and generally limiting transactions to contracts which are traded in sufficient volume to permit the taking and liquidating of positions. Additionally, pursuant to the advisory agreement among WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C., Preferred and the Trading Advisor, Preferred shall automatically terminate the Trading Advisor if the net asset value allocated to the Trading Advisor declines by 40% from the value at the beginning of any year or since the commencement of trading activities. Furthermore, the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement provides that Series F will liquidate its positions, and eventually dissolve, if Series F experiences a decline in net asset value of 50% from the value at the beginning of any year or since the commencement of trading activities. In each case, the decline in net asset value is after giving effect for distributions, contributions and redemptions. Preferred may impose additional restrictions (through modifications of trading limitations and policies) upon the trading activities of the Trading Advisor as it, in good faith, deems to be in the best interest of Series F.

Series F’s futures commission merchant, in accepting orders for the purchase or sale of domestic futures contracts, is required by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) regulations to separately account for and segregate as belonging to Series F all assets of Series F relating to domestic futures trading and is not allowed to commingle such assets with its other assets. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, such segregated assets totaled $348 and $12,161, respectively. Part 30.7 of the CFTC regulations also requires Series F’s futures commission merchant to secure assets of Series F related to foreign futures trading which totaled $0 and $181,554 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. There are no segregation requirements for assets related to forward trading.

-18-

WORLD MONITOR TRUST II – SERIES F

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 8. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following information presents per interest operating performance data and other supplemental financial data for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. This information has been derived from information presented in the financial statements.

	2005			2004			2003
Per Interest Performance
(for an interest outstanding throughout the entire year)
Net asset value per interest at beginning of year	$	143.69		$	139.26		$	118.76
Net realized gain and change in net unrealized gain on commodity transactions (1),(3)		22.22			21.88			35.31
Interest income (1),(3)		4.65			1.89			1.36
Expenses (1),(3)		(13.15	)		(19.34	)		(16.17	)
Net increase for the year		13.72			4.43			20.50
Net asset value per interest at end of year	$	157.41		$	143.69		$	139.26
Total Return
Total return before incentive fees		9.55	%		6.84	%		20.08	%
Incentive fees		0.00	%		(3.66	)%		(2.82	)%
Total return after incentive fees		9.55	%		3.18	%		17.26	%
Supplemental Data
Ratios to average net asset value:(3)
Net investment (loss) before incentive fees (2)		(5.77	)%		7.91	%		(7.79	)%
Incentive fees		0.00	%		(3.66	)%		(2.82	)%
Net investment (loss) after incentive fees		(5.77	)%		4.25	%		(10.61	)%
Interest income		3.16	%		1.31	%		1.02	%
Incentive fees		0.00	%		3.66	%		2.82	%
Other expenses		8.93	%		9.10	%		8.81	%
Total expenses		8.93	%		12.76	%		11.63	%

Total returns are calculated based on the change in value of an interest during the year. An individual interestholder’s total returns and ratios may vary from the above total returns and ratios based on the timing of additions and redemptions.

⁽¹⁾ Interest income per interest and expenses per interest are calculated by dividing interest income and expenses by the weighted average number of interests outstanding during the period. Net realized gain and change in net unrealized gain on commodity transactions is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per interest with the other per interest information.

⁽²⁾ Represents interest income less total expenses (exclusive of incentive fee).

⁽³⁾ For the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, includes the Trust’s proportionate share of income and expenses of WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.

-19-

SECTION II

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

ANNUAL REPORT

December 31, 2005

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	PAGES
Independent Auditor’s Report – Deloitte & Touche LLP	1
Independent Auditor’s Report – Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C.	2
Financial Statements
Statements of Financial Condition	3
Condensed Schedule of Investments	4
Statements of Operations	5
Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital (Net Asset Value)	6
Notes to Financial Statements	7 –11

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

To the Managing Owner and Members of

WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.

We have audited the accompanying statement of financial condition, including the condensed schedule of investments, of WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005, and the related statements of operations and changes in Unitholders’ capital for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004, including the condensed schedule of investments for 2004, were audited by another auditor whose report dated March 25, 2005, expressed unqualified opinions on those statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards as established by the Auditing Standards Board (United States), and in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the 2005 financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2005, and the results of its operations and changes in Unitholders’ capital for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 29, 2006

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

To the Managing Owner and Members of

WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C.

We have audited the accompanying statement of financial condition of WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C., including the condensed schedule of investments, as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations and changes in members’ capital (net asset value) for the period December 6, 2004 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and changes in its members’ capital (net asset value) for the period December 6, 2004 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C.

Hunt Valley, Maryland

March 25, 2005

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

December 31, 2005 and 2004

	2005			2004
ASSETS
Equity in broker trading accounts
Cash in commodity trading accounts	$	40,427,991		$	42,836,462
Net unrealized (loss) on open contracts		(1,270,180	)		(657,261	)
Interest receivable		0			40,442
Total assets	$	39,157,811		$	42,219,643
LIABILITIES
Commissions payable	$	5,377		$	435
Management fee payable		78,910			64,650
Redemptions payable		316,109			258,271
Total liabilities		400,396			323,356
Commitments
MEMBERS’ CAPITAL (Net Asset Value)
Member A		2,160,971			2,980,766
Member F		36,596,444			38,915,521
Total members’ capital (Net Asset Value)		38,757,415			41,896,287
Total liabilities and members’ capital	$	39,157,811		$	42,219,643

See accompanying notes.

-3-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

December 31, 2005 and 2004

	2005					2004
Futures Contracts	Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) as a % of Trust Capital		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) as a % of Trust Capital		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Futures contracts purchased:
Commodities	(0.88	)%	$	(340,904	)	(0.06	)%	$	(25,083	)
Currencies	0.00	%		0		(1.01	)%		(425,541	)
Interest rates	0.03	%		13,407		0.13	%		56,691
Stock indices	(0.06	)%		(24,587	)	0.69	%		289,217
Net unrealized (loss) on futures contracts purchased	(0.91	)%		(352,084	)	(0.25	)%		(104,716	)
Futures contracts sold:
Commodities	0.00	%		0		(0.01	)%		(5,788	)
Currencies	0.00	%		0		(1.41	)%		(594,763	)
Interest rates	0.67	%		258,268		0.11	%		48,006
Stock indices	(0.02	)%		(9,379	)	0.00	%		0
Net unrealized gain (loss) on futures contracts sold	0.65	%		248,889		(1.31	)%		(552,545	)
Net unrealized (loss) on futures contracts	(0.26	)%	$	(103,195	)	(1.56	)%	$	(657,261	)
Forward Contracts
Forward contracts purchased:
Net unrealized (loss) on forward contracts purchased	(2.71	)%	$	(1,048,402	)	0.00	%	$	0
Forward contracts sold:
Net unrealized (loss) on forward contracts sold	(0.30	)%		(118,583	)	0.00	%		0
Net unrealized (loss) on forward contracts	(3.01	)%	$	(1,166,985	)	0.00	%	$	0
Net unrealized (loss) on futures and forward contracts			$	(1,270,180	)			$	(657,261	)

See accompanying notes.

-4-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Year Ended December 31, 2005 and

For the Period December 6, 2004 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2004

	2005			2004
REVENUES
Realized	$	6,569,223		$	(161,686	)
Change in unrealized		(612,919	)		(657,261	)
Interest income		1,249,612			40,442
Total revenues		7,205,916			(778,505	)
EXPENSES
Commissions		197,880			25,092
Management fee		801,735			64,650
Total expenses		999,615			89,742
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	6,206,301		$	(868,247	)

See accompanying notes.

-5-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL (NET ASSET VALUE)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2005 and

For the Period December 6, 2004 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2004

	Members’ Capital
	Member A			Member F			Total
Balances at December 6, 2004 (commencement of operations)	$	0		$	0		$	0
Additions		3,100,000			39,975,000			43,075,000
Net (loss) for the period December 6, 2004 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2004		(62,573	)		(805,674	)		(868,247	)
Redemptions		(56,661	)		(253,805	)		(310,466	)
Balances at December 31, 2004		2,980,766			38,915,521			41,896,287
Net gain (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2005		386,297			5,820,004			6,206,301
Redemptions		(1,206,092	)		(8,139,081	)		(9,345,173	)
Balances at December 31, 2005	$	2,160,971		$	36,596,444		$	38,757,415

See accompanying notes.

-6-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. ORGANIZATION

A. General Description of the Company

WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. (the “Company”) is a limited liability company organized under the laws of Delaware on November 3, 2004 and commenced trading operations on December 6, 2004. The Company was formed to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of futures contracts, options on futures contracts and forward currency contracts and may, from time to time, engage in cash and spot transactions. Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (“Preferred”) is the Managing Owner of the Company. The Company currently consists of two members: World Monitor Trust – Series A (“Member A”) and World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Member F”) (collectively, the “Members”). Preferred is also the Managing Owner of each of the Members. Upon making the initial capital contribution, each Member received Voting Membership Interests.

The Company is a Member managed limited liability company that is not registered in any capacity with, or subject directly to regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

B. The Trading Advisor

The Company entered into an advisory agreement with Campbell & Company, Inc. (the “Trading Advisor”) to make the trading decisions for the Company.

Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A. Basis of Accounting

The financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Commodity futures and foreign exchange transactions are reflected in the accompanying statement of financial condition on the trade date. Net unrealized gain or loss on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) is reflected in the financial statements in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 39 – “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.” The market value of futures (exchange-traded) contracts is based upon the closing quotation on the various futures exchanges on which the contract is traded. The values which will be used by the Company for open forward positions will be provided by its administrator, who obtains market quotes from data vendors and third parties. Any change in net unrealized gain or loss during the current period is reported in the statement of operations. Realized gains and losses on transactions are recognized in the period in which the contracts are closed. Brokerage commissions include other trading fees and are charged to expense when incurred.

-7-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

A. Basis of Accounting (Continued)

The Company has elected not to provide a Statement of Cash Flows as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 102, “Statement of Cash Flows – Exemption of Certain Enterprises and Classification of Cash Flows from Certain Securities Acquired for Resale.”

Consistent with standard business practices in the normal course of business, the Company has provided general indemnifications to its Trading Advisor and others when they act, in good faith, in the best interests of the Company. The Company is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that could potentially result from any hypothetical future claim, but expects the risk of having to make any payments under these general business indemnifications to be remote.

Cash represents amounts deposited with clearing brokers, a portion of which are restricted for purposes of meeting margin requirements, which typically range from 0% to 35% of the notional amounts of the derivatives traded, and receives interest on all cash balances held by the clearing brokers at prevailing rates.

B. Income Taxes

The Company is treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. As such, the Company is not required to provide for, or pay, any Federal or state income taxes. Income tax attributes that arise from its operations are passed directly to the Members. The Company may be subject to other state and local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates.

C. Capital Accounts

The Company accounts for subscriptions, allocations and redemptions on a per member capital account basis.

The Company allocates profits and losses for both financial and tax reporting purposes to its Members weekly on a pro rata basis based on each Member’s pro rata capital in the Company during the week. Distributions (other than redemptions of capital) may be made at the sole discretion of the Members on a pro rata basis in accordance with the Members’ respective capital balances. The Company has not and does not presently intend to make any distributions.

D. Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar; however, it transacts business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect at the date of the statement of financial condition. Income and expense items denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect during the period. Gains and losses resulting from the translation to U.S. dollars are reported in income currently.

-8-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 3. FEES

A. Organizational, General and Administrative Costs

Preferred has paid the costs associated with organizing the Company. Under the WMT Campbell Pool L.L.C. Organization Agreement, Preferred may allocate administrative costs of the Company to the Members. Administrative costs include legal, audit, postage and other routine third party administrative costs. For the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the period ended December 31, 2004, administrative costs of approximately $5,000 and $20,000, respectively, were incurred by Preferred on behalf of the Company.

B. Management and Incentive Fees

The Company pays the Trading Advisor a management fee at an annual rate of 2% of the Company’s Net Assets determined as of the close of business each Friday. The sum of the amounts determined each Friday will be paid monthly. For purposes of determining the management fee, any distributions, redemptions or reallocation of assets made as of the last Friday of each week shall be added back to the assets and there shall be no reduction for (i) the weekly management fees calculated or (ii) any accrued but unpaid incentive fees due the Trading Advisor.

Additionally, the members of the Company pay the Trading Advisor an incentive fee of 22% (the “Incentive Fee”) of “New High Net Trading Profits” (as defined in the Advisory Agreement). The incentive fee will accrue weekly and be paid quarterly. The incentive fee is accrued and paid at the member level.

Note 4. INCOME TAXES

There have been no differences between the tax basis and book basis of Members’ capital since inception of the Company.

Note 5. SUBSCRIPTIONS, DISTRIBUTIONS AND REDEMPTIONS

Investments in the Company are made subject to the terms of the Organization Agreement.

The Company is not required to make distributions, but could do so at the discretion of the Members. A Member can request and receive redemption of capital, subject to the terms in the Organization Agreement.

-9-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS

The Company is exposed to various types of risks associated with the derivative instruments and related markets in which it invests. These risks include, but are not limited to, risk of loss from fluctuations in the value of derivative instruments held (market risk) and the inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the Company’s investment activities (credit risk).

A. Market Risk

Trading in futures and forward contracts (including foreign exchange) involves entering into contractual commitments to purchase or sell a particular commodity at a specified date and price. The gross or face amount of the contracts, which is typically many times that of the Company’s net assets being traded, significantly exceeds the Company’s future cash requirements since the Company intends to close out its open positions prior to settlement. As a result, the Company is generally subject only to the risk of loss arising from the change in the value of the contracts. As such, the Company considers the “fair value” of its derivative instruments to be the net unrealized gain or loss on the contracts. The market risk associated with the Company’s commitments to purchase commodities is limited to the gross or face amount of the contract held. However, when the Company enters into a contractual commitment to sell commodities, it must make delivery of the underlying commodity at the contract price and then repurchase the contract at prevailing market prices or settle in cash. Since the repurchase price to which a commodity can rise is unlimited, entering into commitments to sell commodities exposes the Company to unlimited risk.

Market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including government programs and policies, political and economic events, the level and volatility of interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, the diversification effect among the derivative instruments the Company holds and the liquidity and inherent volatility of the markets in which the Company trades.

B. Credit Risk

When entering into futures or forward contracts, the Company is exposed to credit risk that the counterparty to the contract will not meet its obligations. The counterparty for futures contracts traded on United States and most foreign futures exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with the particular exchange. In general, a clearinghouse is backed by its corporate members who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members (i.e., some foreign exchanges), it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions. On the other bond, there is a concentration risk on forward transactions entered into by the Company as the Companies commodity broker is the sole counterparty. The Company has entered into a master netting agreement with its broker and, as a result, when applicable, presents unrealized gains and losses on open forward positions as a net amount in the statement of financial condition. The amount at risk associated with counterparty non-performance of all of the Company’s contracts is the net unrealized gain included in the statement of financial condition; however, counterparty non-performance on only certain of the Company’s contracts may result in greater loss than non-performance on all of the Company’s contracts. There can be no assurance that any counterparty, clearing member or clearinghouse will meet its obligations to the Company.

-10-

WMT CAMPBELL POOL L.L.C.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Note 6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKS (CONTINUED)

B. Credit Risk (Continued)

The Managing Owner attempts to minimize both credit and market risks by requiring the Company and its Trading Advisor to abide by various trading limitations and policies. Preferred monitors compliance with these trading limitations and policies, which include, but are not limited to, executing and clearing all trades with creditworthy counterparties; limiting the amount of margin or premium required for any one commodity or all commodities combined; and generally limiting transactions to contracts which are traded in sufficient volume to permit the taking and liquidating of positions. Additionally, pursuant to the Advisory Agreement among the Company, Preferred and the Trading Advisor, the Company shall automatically terminate the Trading Agreement, if the net asset value allocated to the Trading Advisor declines by 40% from the value at the beginning of any year or since the effective date of the Advisory Agreement. The decline in net asset value is after giving effect for distributions, subscriptions and redemptions.

The Company’s futures commission merchant, in accepting orders for the purchase or sale of domestic futures contracts, is required by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) regulations to separately account for and segregate as belonging to the Company all assets of the Company relating to domestic futures trading and is not allowed to commingle such assets with its other assets. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, such segregated assets totaled $4,041,188 and $5,765,078, respectively. Part 30.7 of the CFTC regulations also requires the Company’s futures commission merchant to secure assets of the Company related to foreign futures trading which totaled $39,656 and $36,414,123 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. There are no segregation requirements for assets related to forward trading.

As of December 31, 2005, all open futures contracts mature within nine months.

Note  7. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following information presents the financial highlights of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the period December 6, 2004 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2004. This information has been derived from information presented in the financial statements.

	2005				2004
	Member A		Member F		Member A		Member F
Total return(1)	17.17	%	16.98	%	(2.05	)%	(2.05	)%
Total expenses(2)	(2.47	)%	(2.51	)%	(2.00	)%	(2.00	)%
Net investment income (loss)(2)	.62	%	.63	%	(0.75	)%	(0.75	)%

Total return and ratios to average net asset value are calculated for Members’ capital taken as a whole. An individual Member’s total return and ratios may vary from the above return and ratios based on the timing of subscriptions and redemptions.

⁽¹⁾ Not annualized.

⁽²⁾ Annualized.

-11-

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., the Managing Owner of World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Series F”), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust II – Series F;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006	/s/    Kenneth A. Shewer
	Kenneth A. Shewer
	Co-Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., the Managing Owner of World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Series F”), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust II – Series F;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006	/s/    Maureen D. Howley
	Maureen D. Howley
	Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

EX-31.3

EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, David K. Spohr, Vice President and Director of Fund Administration of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., the Managing Owner of World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Series F”), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust II – Series F;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006	/s/    David K. Spohr
	David K. Spohr
	Vice President and Director of Fund Administration

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the “Managing Owner”), of World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Series F”), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) Series F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series F.

/s/    Kenneth A. Shewer

Kenneth A. Shewer

Co-Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2006

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the “Managing Owner”), of World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Series F”), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) Series F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series F.

/s/    Maureen D. Howley

Maureen D. Howley

Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

March 31, 2006

EX-32.3

EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, Vice President and Director of Fund Administration of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the “Managing Owner”), of World Monitor Trust II – Series F (“Series F”), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) Series F’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series F.

/s/ David K. Spohr

David K. Spohr

Vice President and Director of Fund Administration

March 31, 2006