10-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

þ	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from             to

Commission file number 00-24525

Cumulus Media Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	36-4159663
(State of Incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

14 Piedmont Center

Suite 1400

Atlanta, GA 30305

(404) 949-0700

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,

including area code, of registrant’s principal offices)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Class A Common Stock; Par Value $.01 per share

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o No þ

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o No þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o

     Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

     The aggregate market value of the registrant’s outstanding voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2005, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $502.3 million, based on 69,535,491 shares outstanding and a last reported per share price of Class A Common Stock on the NASDAQ National Market of $11.78 on that date. As of February 28, 2006, the registrant had outstanding 59,925,324 shares of common stock consisting of (i) 47,649,694 shares of Class A Common Stock; (ii) 11,630,759 shares of Class B Common Stock; and (iii) 644,871 shares of Class C Common Stock.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

     Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, have been incorporated by reference in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL Year Ended December 31, 2005

Item		Page
Number		Number
	Index		1
PART I
1.	Business		2
1A.	Risk Factors		25
1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		32
2.	Properties		32
3.	Legal Proceedings		32
4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		33
PART II
5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		33
6.	Selected Consolidated Financial Data		35
7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		36
7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk		55
8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		55
9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		56
9A.	Controls and Procedures		56
9B.	Other Information		57
PART III
10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant		57
11.	Executive Compensation		57
12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		57
13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		58
14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		58
PART IV
15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		58
	Signatures		60
EX-23.1 CONSENT OF KPMG LLP
EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO & CFO

1

PART 1

Item 1. Business

Certain Definitions

      In this Form 10-K the terms “Company”, “Cumulus”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to Cumulus Media Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

      We use the term “local marketing agreement” (“LMA”) in various places in this report. A typical LMA is an agreement under which a Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licensee of a radio station makes available, for a fee, air time on its station to another party. The other party provides programming to be broadcast during the airtime and collects revenues from advertising it sells for broadcast during that programming. In addition to entering into LMAs, we will from time to time enter into management or consulting agreements that provide us with the ability, as contractually specified, to assist current owners in the management of radio station assets that we have contracted to purchase, subject to FCC approval. In such arrangements, we generally receive a contractually specified management fee or consulting fee in exchange for the services provided.

      We also use the term “joint services agreement” (“JSA”) in several places in this report. A typical JSA is an agreement which authorizes one party or station to sell another station’s advertising time and retain the revenue from the sale of that airtime. A JSA typically includes a periodic payment to the station whose airtime is being sold (which may include a share of the revenue being collected from the sale of airtime).

      Unless otherwise indicated:

•  we obtained total radio industry listener and revenue levels from the Radio Advertising Bureau (the “RAB”);

•  we derived historical market revenue statistics and market revenue share percentages from data published by Miller Kaplan, Arase & Co., LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a public accounting firm that specializes in serving the broadcasting industry and BIA Financial Network, Inc. (“BIA”), a media and telecommunications advisory services firm;

•  we derived all audience share data and audience rankings, including ranking by population, except where otherwise stated to the contrary, from surveys of people ages 12 and over (“Adults 12+”), listening Monday through Sunday, 6 a.m. to 12 midnight, and based on the Fall 2005 Arbitron Market Report, referred to as Arbitron’s Market Report, pertaining to each market; and

•  all dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest million, unless otherwise indicated.

      The term “Station Operating Income” is used in various places in this document. Station Operating Income consists of operating income (loss) before non-cash contract termination costs, depreciation, amortization, LMA fees, corporate general and administrative expenses, non-cash stock compensation expense, restructuring charges (credits) and impairment charges. Station Operating Income isolates the amount of income generated solely by our stations and assists our management in evaluating the earnings potential of our station portfolio.

      In deriving this measure, we exclude non-cash contract termination costs as the charge will never represent a cash obligation to our station operations. We exclude depreciation and amortization due to the insignificant investment in tangible assets required to operate our stations and the relatively insignificant amount of intangible assets subject to amortization. We exclude LMA fees from this measure, even though it requires a cash commitment, due to the insignificance and temporary nature of such fees. Corporate expenses, despite representing an additional significant cash commitment, are excluded in an effort to present the operating performance of our stations exclusive of the corporate resources employed. We believe this is important to our investors because it allows for a determination of the gross margin generated by our station portfolio. Finally, we exclude non-cash stock compensation, restructuring charges

2

(credits) and impairment charges from the measure as they do not represent cash payments related to the operation of the stations.

      We believe that Station Operating Income, although not a measure that is calculated in accordance with GAAP, nevertheless is the most frequently used financial measure in determining the market value of a radio station or group of stations. We have observed that Station Operating Income is commonly employed by firms that provide appraisal services to the broadcast industry in valuing radio stations. Further, in each of the more than 140 radio station acquisitions we have completed since our inception, we have used Station Operating Income as our primary metric to evaluate and negotiate the purchase price to be paid. Given its relevance to the estimated value of a radio station, we believe, and our experience indicates, that investors consider the metric to be extremely useful in order to determine the value of our portfolio of stations. We believe that Station Operating Income is the most commonly used financial measure employed by the investment community to compare the performance of radio station operators.

      Finally, Station Operating Income is the primary metric that our management uses to evaluate the performance and results of our stations. Our management uses the measure to assess the performance of our station managers and our Board of Directors uses in connection with determining the relative performance of our executive management. As a result, in disclosing Station Operating Income, we are providing our stockholders, and the public, with an analysis of our performance that is consistent with that utilized by our management. Nevertheless, it should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income, operating income (loss), cash flows from operating activities or any other measure for determining our operating performance or liquidity that is calculated in accordance with GAAP. As Station Operating Income is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, this measure may not be compared to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a quantitative reconciliation of Station Operating Income to its most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

Company Overview

      We own and operate FM and AM radio station clusters serving mid-sized markets throughout the United States. Through our investment in Cumulus Media Partners, LLC (“CMP”), described below, we will also operate radio station clusters serving large-sized markets throughout the United States. We are the second largest radio broadcasting company in the United States based on the number of stations owned or operated. According to Arbitron’s Market Report and data published by Miller Kaplan, we have assembled market-leading groups or clusters of radio stations that rank first or second in terms of revenue share or audience share in substantially all of our markets. As of December 31, 2005, we owned and operated 307 radio stations in 61 mid-sized U.S. media markets and, together with three private equity firms, had formed CMP to acquire 33 radio stations in 8 markets, including San Francisco, Dallas, Houston and Atlanta. In addition, we own and operate a multi-market network of five radio stations in the English-speaking Caribbean. Under our LMAs, we currently provide sales and marketing services for two radio stations in two U.S. markets in exchange for a management or consulting fee, pending FCC approval of our acquisitions of these stations. We will own and operate, directly and through our investment in CMP, a total of 345 stations in 67 U.S. markets upon FCC approval and consummation of all of our pending acquisitions.

Our Mid-Market Focus . . .

      Historically, our strategic focus has been on mid-sized markets throughout the United States. Relative to the 50 largest markets in the United States, we believe that the mid-sized markets represent attractive operating environments and generally are characterized by:

•  a greater use of radio advertising as evidenced by the greater percentage of total media revenues captured by radio than the national average;

•  rising advertising revenues, as the larger national and regional retailers expand into these markets;

3

•  small independent operators, many of whom lack the capital to produce high-quality locally originated programming or to employ more sophisticated research, marketing, management and sales techniques; and

•  lower overall susceptibility to economic downturns.

      We believe that the attractive operating characteristics of mid-sized markets, together with the relaxation of radio station ownership limits under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the “Telecom Act”) and FCC rules, have created significant opportunities for growth from the formation of groups of radio stations within these markets. We have capitalized on these opportunities to acquire attractive properties at favorable purchase prices, taking advantage of the size and fragmented nature of ownership in these markets and to the greater attention historically given to the larger markets by radio station acquirers. According to the FCC’s records, as of December 31, 2005 there were 8,903 FM and 4,757 AM stations in the United States.

. . . and Our Large-Market Opportunities

      Although our historical focus has been on mid-sized radio markets in the United States, we recognize that the large-sized radio markets currently provide an attractive combination of scale, stability and opportunity for future growth. These markets typically have per capita and household income, and expected household after-tax effective buying income growth in excess of the national average, according to BIA, which we believe makes radio broadcasters in these markets attractive to a broad base of radio advertisers and allows a radio broadcaster to reduce its dependence on any one economic sector or specific advertiser. In recognition of this, in October 2005 we announced the formation of CMP, a newly formed private partnership created by Cumulus and affiliates of Bain Capital Partners LLC, The Blackstone Group and Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., to acquire the radio broadcasting business of Susquehanna Pfaltzgraff Co. (“Susquehanna”). CMP has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Susquehanna’s radio business for approximately $1.2 billion, in a transaction expected to be completed in the first half of 2006. Susquehanna Radio is the largest privately owned radio broadcasting company in the United States and the 11th largest radio station operator in terms of revenue. The group consists of 33 radio stations in 8 markets: San Francisco, Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, Cincinnati, Kansas City, Indianapolis and York, Pennsylvania. See “— Acquisitions and Dispositions — Cumulus Media Partners, LLC.”

* * *

      To maximize the advertising revenues and Station Operating Income of our stations, we seek to enhance the quality of radio programs for listeners and the attractiveness of our radio stations to advertisers in a given market. We also seek to increase the amount of locally originated programming content that airs on each station. Within each market, our stations are diversified in terms of format, target audience and geographic location, enabling us to attract larger and broader listener audiences and thereby a wider range of advertisers. This diversification, coupled with our competitive advertising pricing, also has provided us with the ability to compete successfully for advertising revenue against other radio, print and television media competitors.

      We believe that we are in a position to generate revenue growth, increase audience and revenue shares within our markets and, by capitalizing on economies of scale and by competing against other media for incremental advertising revenue, increase our Station Operating Income growth rates and margins. Some of our markets are still in the development stage with the potential for substantial growth as we implement our operating strategy. In our more established markets, we believe we have several significant opportunities for growth within our current business model, including growth through maturation of recently reformatted or rebranded stations, and through investment in signal upgrades, which allow for a larger audience reach, for stations that were already strong performers.

      We are a Delaware corporation, organized in 2002, and successor by merger to an Illinois corporation with the same name that had been organized in 1997.

4

Strategy

      We are focused on generating internal growth through improvement in Station Operating Income for the portfolio of stations we operate, while enhancing our station portfolio and our business as a whole, through the acquisition of individual stations or clusters that satisfy our acquisition criteria.

Operating Strategy

      Our operating strategy has the following principal components:

•  achieve cost efficiencies associated with common infrastructure and personnel and increase revenue by offering regional coverage of key demographic groups that were previously unavailable to national and regional advertisers;

•  develop each station in our portfolio as a unique enterprise, marketed as an individual, local brand with its own identity, programming content, programming personnel, inventory of time slots and sales force;

•  use audience research and music testing to refine each station’s programming content to match the preferences of the station’s target demographic audience, in order to enrich our listeners’ experiences by increasing both the quality and quantity of local programming; and

•  position station clusters to compete with print and television advertising by combining favorable advertising pricing with diverse station formats within each market to draw a larger and broader listening audience to attract a wider range of advertisers.

Acquisition Strategy

      Our acquisition strategy has the following principal components:

•  assemble leading radio station clusters in mid-sized markets by taking advantage of their size and fragmented nature ownership;

•  acquire leading stations where we believe we can cost-effectively achieve a leading position in terms of signal coverage, revenue or audience share and acquire under-performing stations where there is significant potential to apply our management expertise to improve financial and operating performance; and

•  reconfigure our existing stations, or acquire new stations, located near large markets, that based on an engineering analysis of signal specifications and the likelihood of receiving FCC approval, can be redirected, or “moved-in,” to those larger markets.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

Completed Acquisitions

      We completed three acquisitions of ten radio stations in four markets and the acquisition of a studio facility during the year ended December 31, 2005. Of the $47.8 million required to fund these acquisitions, $47.4 million was funded in cash and $0.4 million represented capitalizable external acquisition costs. These aggregate acquisition amounts include the assets acquired pursuant to the select transactions highlighted below.

      On March 4, 2005, we completed the acquisition of KFRU-AM, KBXR-FM, KOQL-FM and KPLA-FM serving Columbia, Missouri and KLIK-AM, KBBM-FM and KJMO-FM serving Jefferson City, Missouri from Premier Radio Group. In connection with the acquisition, we paid $38.7 million in cash and incurred $0.1 million in capitalizable acquisition costs. The Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri stations were acquired primarily because they complemented our station portfolio and increased both our state and regional coverage.

5

      On March 31, 2005, we purchased the broadcast license for KVST-FM, licensed to LaPorte, Texas and serving Houston, Texas, for $34.8 million. Of the $34.8 million required to purchase the broadcast license, $31.1 million was funded in cash, $1.0 million had been previously funded in the form of a cash escrow deposit and $2.7 million was paid in capitalizable acquisition costs. During the second quarter of 2005, we completed the construction of a broadcast tower and transmitter site for this station and commenced broadcasting and operation. The addition of KVST-FM represents our second FM station in the Houston market.

Pending Acquisitions

      As of December 31, 2005, we were a party to various agreements to acquire three stations across two markets. The aggregate purchase price of those pending acquisitions is expected to be approximately $5.6 million in cash.

      As of December 31, 2005, we were also a party to two asset exchange agreements, under which we have agreed to transfer two stations in its Ft. Walton Beach, Florida market plus $3.0 million in cash in exchange for two different stations in the market. As of December 31, 2005, we have put $2.3 million in escrow funds toward these asset exchange transactions.

Cumulus Media Partners, LLC

      On October 31, 2005, we announced that, together with affiliates of three private equity firms, Bain Capital Partners LLC, The Blackstone Group and Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (collectively, the “Sponsors”), we formed CMP, which has entered into agreements to acquire the radio broadcasting business of Susquehanna. The acquisition is expected to close in the first half of 2006 and is subject to regulatory approvals, as well as other closing conditions. In connection with the proposed acquisition, we entered into (or will enter into in connection with the consummation of the proposed acquisition) various agreements.

      First, on October 31, 2005, we and the Sponsors entered into a definitive capital contribution agreement with CMP in order to provide for the capitalization of CMP and its subsidiaries. Pursuant to the capital contribution agreement, we will contribute our Kansas City, Missouri and Houston, Texas radio operations and assets to CMP, in exchange for an equity stake initially valued at approximately 25% of the equity of CMP. The Sponsors will contribute cash in exchange for the remaining approximately 75% equity stake. The capitalization of CMP is expected to occur immediately prior to the closing of the Susquehanna acquisition, and is contingent on, among other things, satisfaction of all conditions precedent to the acquisition.

      Also on October 31, 2005, we and the Sponsors entered into a limited liability company agreement, which sets forth the terms related to the membership interests to be held by the members of CMP. CMP was formed to acquire and operate the radio operations of Susquehanna and the Kansas City and Houston radio operations and assets of Cumulus, as well as to acquire and operate additional radio broadcasting stations in the top 50 radio broadcast markets in the United States. Under the terms of the limited liability company agreement, the distributions by CMP to its members will be calculated according to a formula that values our interest at up to $150 million, or approximately 40% of the equity interests in CMP, subject to achieving certain performance criteria.

      In addition, upon the capitalization of CMP and the consummation of the Susquehanna acquisition, Cumulus and the Sponsors, as the equityholders of CMP, will enter into an equityholders’ agreement with CMP and certain of its subsidiaries, setting forth the transfer restrictions, voting rights and powers of the equityholders with respect to the corporate governance of CMP and its subsidiaries. Pursuant to the equityholders’ agreement, the boards of directors of CMP and certain of its subsidiaries shall each be comprised of eight members: two directors designated by each of us and each Sponsor. Generally, any significant action taken by CMP or its subsidiaries during the initial three years will need our approval and the approval of a majority of the Sponsors and, thereafter, simply a majority of the membership interests. We and the Sponsors will have preemptive rights with respect to any new issuance of securities by CMP

6

or its subsidiaries. In addition, the equityholders’ agreement provides that the parties may not transfer their equity interests in CMP, except under certain circumstances. The parties also have rights of first offer, “tag-along” rights and “drag-along” rights in the event of proposed transfers of equity interests in CMP. The equityholders’ agreement also contains a provision that affords CMP the right to pursue first any acquisition opportunities involving radio broadcasting operations primarily in the top 50 radio broadcasting markets in the United States. If CMP declines such an opportunity, then we will have the right to pursue it. With regard to acquisition opportunities involving other U.S. markets, CMP must allow us the right to pursue first any such opportunity.

      Additionally, upon the capitalization of CMP and the consummation of the Susquehanna acquisition, we will enter into a management agreement with a subsidiary of CMP under which, subject to oversight by the board of directors, we will manage CMP’s radio broadcasting operations and corporate development, including management at the corporate level of sales, programming, marketing, technical, finance, accounting, legal, human resources, risk management and information technology, as well as evaluation and consummation of divestitures, acquisitions, swaps, signal upgrades, move-ins, and digital radio build-out and development. Pursuant to the management agreement, our senior management will serve as the senior management of the entities owning or operating the managed assets, though we will maintain responsibility for all salary, benefits and related employment compensation expenses. In exchange for its management services, we will receive an annual management fee equal to the greater of $4.0 million or 4% of CMP’s adjusted earnings, payable on a quarterly basis.

FCC FM Frequency Auction

      Periodically, the FCC makes FM frequencies available for acquisition through an auction process. On November 3, 2004, the FCC held an auction for approximately 290 frequencies. As of the close of the auction, we were the winning bidder for seven frequencies and were obligated to pay the FCC $8.6 million. During 2005, the FCC granted the final authorization on and we completed the purchase of six of the seven frequencies won in the November 2004 auction. As of December 31, 2005, we had funded $7.6 million of our total obligation. We expect to complete the purchase of the remaining frequency from the November 2004 auction during the first half of 2006.

      On January 12, 2006, the FCC held a similar auction for approximately 171 frequencies, located mostly in remote areas of the country, in which we actively participated. As of the close of the auction, we were the winning bidder for one frequency and were obligated to pay the FCC $1.6 million. As of December 31, 2005, we had funded $0.7 toward our obligation to the FCC in the form of an escrow deposit, to be applied by the FCC to the bid price upon grant of the final authorization for the frequency. This authorization will enable us to add a station to one of our existing markets once constructed.

Completed Dispositions

      In August 2005, we completed the disposition of one station in the Blacksburg, Virginia market for approximately $1.8 million in cash. Of the total consideration, we received $1.7 million at closing and $0.1 million was held in escrow and will be released upon resolution of post closing matters. In connection with the transaction, we recorded a $0.4 million gain on sale of assets.

Acquisition Shelf Registration Statement

      We have registered an aggregate of 20,000,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock, pursuant to registration statements on Form S-4, for issuance from time to time in connection with our acquisition of other businesses, properties or securities in business combination transactions utilizing a “shelf” registration process. As of February 28, 2006, we had issued 5,666,553 of the 20,000,000 shares registered in connection with various acquisitions.

7

Industry Overview

      The primary source of revenues for radio stations is the sale of advertising time to local, regional and national spot advertisers and national network advertisers. National spot advertisers assist advertisers in placing their advertisements in a specific market. National network advertisers place advertisements on a national network show and such advertisements will air in each market where the network has an affiliate. During the past decade, local advertising revenue as a percentage of total radio advertising revenue in a given market has ranged from approximately 72% to 87% according to the RAB. The growth in total radio advertising revenue tends to be fairly stable. With the exception of 1991 and 2001, when total radio advertising revenue fell by approximately 3% and 8%, respectively, advertising revenue has risen each year since 1950, according to the RAB.

      Radio is considered an efficient, cost-effective means of reaching specifically identified demographic groups. Stations are typically classified by their on-air format, such as country, rock, adult contemporary, oldies and news/talk. A station’s format and style of presentation enables it to target specific segments of listeners sharing certain demographic features. By capturing a specific share of a market’s radio listening audience, with particular concentration in a targeted demographic, a station is able to market its broadcasting time to advertisers seeking to reach a specific audience. Advertisers and stations use data published by audience measuring services, such as Arbitron, to estimate how many people within particular geographical markets and demographics listen to specific stations.

      The number of advertisements that can be broadcast without jeopardizing listening levels and the resulting ratings are limited in part by the format of a particular station and the local competitive environment. Although the number of advertisements broadcast during a given time period may vary, the total number of advertisements broadcast on a particular station generally does not vary significantly from year to year.

      A station’s local sales staff generates the majority of its local and regional advertising sales through direct solicitations of local advertising agencies and businesses. To generate national advertising sales, a station usually will engage a firm that specializes in soliciting radio-advertising sales on a national level. National sales representatives obtain advertising principally from advertising agencies located outside the station’s market and receive commissions based on the revenue from the advertising they obtain.

      Our stations compete for advertising revenue with other terrestrial-based radio stations in the market (including low power FM radio stations that are required to operate on a noncommercial basis) as well as other media, including newspapers, broadcast television, cable television, magazines, direct mail, coupons and outdoor advertising. In addition, the radio broadcasting industry is subject to competition from services that use new media technologies that are being developed or have already been introduced, such as the Internet and satellite-based digital radio services. Such services reach nationwide and regional audiences with multi-channel, multi-format, digital radio services that have a sound quality equivalent to that of compact discs. Competition among terrestrial-based radio stations has also been heightened by the introduction of terrestrial digital audio broadcasting (which is digital audio broadcasting delivered through earth-based equipment rather than satellites). The FCC currently allows terrestrial radio stations like ours to commence the use of digital technology through a “hybrid” antenna that carries both the pre-existing analog signal and the new digital signal. The FCC is conducting a proceeding that could result in a radio station’s use of two antennae: one for the analog signal and one for the digital signal.

      We cannot predict how existing or new sources of competition will affect the revenues generated by our stations. The radio broadcasting industry historically has grown despite the introduction of new technologies for the delivery of entertainment and information, such as television broadcasting, cable television, audio tapes and compact discs. A growing population and greater availability of radios, particularly car and portable radios, have contributed to this growth. There can be no assurance, however, that the development or introduction in the future of any new media technology will not have an adverse effect on the radio broadcasting industry in general or our stations in particular.

8

Advertising Sales

      Virtually all of our revenue is generated from the sale of local, regional and national advertising for broadcast on our radio stations. Approximately 89%, 87% and 85% of our net broadcasting revenue was generated from the sale of local and regional advertising in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Additional broadcasting revenue is generated from the sale of national advertising. The major categories of our advertisers include:

• automotive dealers	• telecommunications	• banking and mortgage
• amusement and recreation	• food services and drinking	• arts and entertainment
• healthcare services	• food and beverage stores	• furniture and home furnishings

      Each station’s local sales staff solicits advertising either directly from the local advertiser or indirectly through an advertising agency. We employ a tiered commission structure to focus our individual sales staffs on new business development. Consistent with our operating strategy of dedicated sales forces for each of our stations, we have also increased the number of salespeople per station. We believe that we can outperform the traditional growth rates of our markets by (1) expanding our base of advertisers, (2) training newly hired sales people and (3) providing a higher level of service to our existing customer base. This requires larger sales staffs than most of the stations employ at the time they are acquired by Cumulus. We support our strategy of building local direct accounts by employing personnel in each of our markets to produce custom commercials that respond to the needs of our advertisers. In addition, in-house production provides advertisers greater flexibility in changing their commercial messages with minimal lead-time.

      Our national sales are made by Katz Communications, Inc., a firm specializing in radio advertising sales on the national level, in exchange for a commission that is based on our net revenue from the advertising obtained. Regional sales, which we define as sales in regions surrounding our markets to buyers that advertise in our markets, are generally made by our local sales staff and market managers. Whereas we seek to grow our local sales through larger and more customer-focused sales staffs, we seek to grow our national and regional sales by offering to key national and regional advertisers groups of stations within specific markets and regions that make our stations more attractive. Many of these large accounts have previously been reluctant to advertise in these markets because of the logistics involved in buying advertising from individual stations. Certain of our stations had no national representation before we acquired them.

      The number of advertisements that can be broadcast without jeopardizing listening levels and the resulting ratings are limited in part by the format of a particular station. We estimate the optimal number of advertisements available for sale depending on the programming format of a particular station. Each of our stations has a general target level of on-air inventory that it makes available for advertising. This target level of inventory for sale may be different at different times of the day but tends to remain stable over time. Our stations strive to maximize revenue by managing their on-air inventory of advertising time and adjusting prices up or down based on supply and demand. We seek to broaden our base of advertisers in each of our markets by providing a wide array of audience demographic segments across our cluster of stations, thereby providing each of our potential advertisers with an effective means of reaching a targeted demographic group. Our selling and pricing activity is based on demand for our radio stations’ on-air inventory and, in general, we respond to this demand by varying prices rather than by varying our target inventory level for a particular station. Most changes in revenue are explained by some combination of demand-driven pricing changes and changes in inventory utilization rather than by changes in the available inventory. Advertising rates charged by radio stations, which are generally highest during morning and afternoon commuting hours, are based primarily on:

•  a station’s share of audiences generally, and in the demographic groups targeted by advertisers (as measured by ratings surveys);

9

•  the supply of and demand for radio advertising time generally and for time targeted at particular demographic groups; and

•  certain additional qualitative factors.

      A station’s listenership is reflected in ratings surveys that estimate the number of listeners tuned to the station and the time they spend listening. Each station’s ratings are used by its advertisers and advertising representatives to consider advertising with the station and are used by Cumulus to chart audience growth, set advertising rates and adjust programming. The radio broadcast industry’s principal ratings service is Arbitron, which publishes periodic ratings surveys for significant domestic radio markets. These surveys are our primary source of ratings data.

      We have an agreement with Arbitron that gives us access to Arbitron’s ratings materials in a majority of our markets through July 2009.

Competition

      The radio broadcasting industry is very competitive. The success of each of our stations depends largely upon its audience ratings and its share of the overall advertising revenue within its market. Our audience ratings and advertising revenue are subject to change, and any adverse change in a particular market affecting advertising expenditures or an adverse change in the relative market share of the stations located in a particular market could have a material adverse effect on the revenue of our radio stations located in that market. There can be no assurance that any one or all of our stations will be able to maintain or increase current audience ratings or advertising revenue market share.

      Our stations, including those to be acquired upon completion of the pending acquisitions, compete for listeners and advertising revenues directly with other radio stations within their respective markets, as well as with other advertising media as discussed below. Radio stations compete for listeners primarily on the basis of program content that appeals to a particular demographic group. By building a strong brand identity with a targeted listener base consisting of specific demographic groups in each of our markets, we are able to attract advertisers seeking to reach those listeners. Companies that operate radio stations must be alert to the possibility of another station changing its format to compete directly for listeners and advertisers. Another station’s decision to convert to a format similar to that of one of our radio stations in the same geographic area or to launch an aggressive promotional campaign may result in lower ratings and advertising revenue, increased promotion and other expenses and, consequently, lower our Station Operating Income.

      Factors that are material to a radio station’s competitive position include station brand identity and loyalty, management experience, the station’s local audience rank in its market, transmitter power and location, assigned frequency, audience characteristics, local program acceptance and the number and characteristics of other radio stations and other advertising media in the market area. We attempt to improve our competitive position in each market by extensively researching and improving our stations’ programming, by implementing advertising campaigns aimed at the demographic groups for which our stations program and by managing our sales efforts to attract a larger share of advertising dollars for each station individually. However, we compete with some organizations that have substantially greater financial or other resources than we do.

      In 1996, changes in federal law and FCC rules dramatically increased the number of radio stations a single party can own and operate in a local market. Our management continues to believe that companies that elect to take advantage of those changes by forming groups of commonly owned stations or joint arrangements such as LMAs in a particular market may, in certain circumstances, have lower operating costs and may be able to offer advertisers in those markets more attractive rates and services. Although we currently operate multiple stations in each of our markets and intend to pursue the creation of additional multiple station groups in particular markets, our competitors in certain markets include other parties who own and operate as many or more stations than we do. We may also compete with those other parties or broadcast groups for the purchase of additional stations in those markets or new markets. Some of those

10

other parties and groups are owned or operated by companies that have substantially greater financial or other resources than we do.

      A radio station’s competitive position can be enhanced by a variety of factors, including changes in the station’s format and an upgrade of the station’s authorized power. However, the competitive position of existing radio stations is protected to some extent by certain regulatory barriers to new entrants. The operation of a radio broadcast station requires an FCC license, and the number of radio stations that an entity can operate in a given market is limited. Under FCC rules that became effective in 2004, the number of radio stations that a party can own in a particular market is dictated largely by whether the station is in a defined “Arbitron Metro” (a designation designed by a private party for use in advertising matters), and, if so, the number of stations included in that Arbitron Metro. In those markets that are not in an Arbitron Metro, the number of stations a party can own in the particular market is dictated by the number of AM and FM signals that together comprise that FCC-defined radio market. For a discussion of FCC regulation (including recent changes), see “— Federal Regulation of Radio Broadcasting.”

      Our stations also compete for advertising revenue with other media, including low power FM radio stations (that are required to operate on a noncommercial basis), newspapers, broadcast television, cable and satellite television, magazines, direct mail, coupons and outdoor advertising. In addition, the radio broadcasting industry is subject to competition from companies that use new media technologies that are being developed or have already been introduced, such as the Internet and the delivery of digital audio programming by cable television systems, by satellite radio carriers, and by terrestrial-based radio stations that broadcast digital audio signals. The FCC has authorized two companies to provide a digital audio programming service by satellite to nationwide audiences with a multi-channel, multi-format and with sound quality equivalent to that of compact discs. The FCC has also authorized FM terrestrial stations like ours to use two separate antennae to deliver both the current analog radio signal and a new digital signal. The FCC is also exploring the possibility of allowing AM stations to deliver both analog and digital signals.

      We cannot predict how new sources of competition will affect our performance and income. The radio broadcasting industry historically has grown despite the introduction of new technologies for the delivery of entertainment and information, such as television broadcasting, cable television, audio tapes and compact discs. A growing population and greater availability of radios, particularly car and portable radios, have contributed to this growth. There can be no assurance, however, that the development or introduction in the future of any new media technology will not have an adverse effect on the radio broadcasting industry in general or our stations in particular.

      We cannot predict what other matters might be considered in the future by the FCC or Congress, nor can we assess in advance what impact, if any, the implementation of any of these proposals or changes might have on our business.

Employees

      At December 31, 2005, we employed approximately 3,392 people. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we consider our relations with our employees to be satisfactory.

      We employ various on-air personalities with large loyal audiences in their respective markets. On occasion, we enter into employment agreements with these personalities to protect our interests in those relationships that we believe to be valuable. The loss of one or more of these personalities could result in a short-term loss of audience share, but we do not believe that any such loss would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, taken as a whole.

      We generally employ one market manager for each radio market in which we own or operate stations. Each market manager is responsible for all employees of the market and for managing all aspects of the radio operations. On occasion, we enter into employment agreements with market managers to protect our interests in those relationships that we believe to be valuable. The loss of a market manager could result in

11

a short-term loss of performance in a market, but we do not believe that any such loss would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, taken as a whole.

Federal Regulation of Radio Broadcasting

      General. The ownership, operation and sale of radio broadcast stations, including those licensed to us, are subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC, which acts under authority derived from the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Communications Act”). The Telecom Act amended the Communications Act and directed the FCC to change certain of its broadcast rules. Among its other regulatory responsibilities, the FCC issues permits and licenses to construct and operate radio stations; assigns broadcast frequencies; determines whether to approve changes in ownership or control of station licenses; regulates transmission equipment, operating power, and other technical parameters of stations; adopts and implements regulations and policies that directly or indirectly affect the ownership, operation and employment practices of stations; regulates the content of some forms of radio broadcast programming; and has the authority under the Communications Act to impose penalties for violations of its rules.

      The following is a brief summary of certain provisions of the Communications Act, the Telecom Act, and related FCC rules and policies (collectively, the “Communications Laws”). This description does not purport to be comprehensive, and reference should be made to the Communications Laws, public notices, and decisions issued by the FCC for further information concerning the nature and extent of federal regulation of radio broadcast stations. Failure to observe the provisions of the Communications Laws can result in the imposition of various sanctions, including monetary forfeitures and the grant of a “short-term” (less than the maximum term) license renewal. For particularly egregious violations, the FCC may deny a station’s license renewal application, revoke a station’s license, or deny applications in which an applicant seeks to acquire additional broadcast properties.

      License Grant and Renewal. Radio broadcast licenses are generally granted and renewed for maximum terms of eight years. Licenses are renewed by filing an application with the FCC. Petitions to deny license renewal applications may be filed by interested parties, including members of the public. We are not currently aware of any facts that would prevent the timely renewal of our licenses to operate our radio stations, although there can be no assurance that each of our licenses will be renewed for a full term without adverse conditions.

      Service Areas. The area served by AM stations is determined by a combination of frequency, transmitter power, antenna orientation, and soil conductivity. To determine the effective service area of an AM station, the station’s power, operating frequency, antenna patterns and its day/night operating modes are required. The area served by an FM station is determined by a combination of transmitter power and antenna height, with stations divided into classes according to these technical parameters.

      Class C FM stations operate with the equivalent of 100 kilowatts of effective radiated power (“ERP”) at an antenna height of up to 1,968 feet above average terrain. They are the most powerful FM stations, providing service to a large area, typically covering one or more counties within a state. Class B FM stations operate with the equivalent of 50 kilowatts ERP at an antenna height of up to 492 feet above average terrain. Class B stations typically serve large metropolitan areas as well as their associated suburbs. Class A FM stations operate with the equivalent of 6 kilowatts ERP at an antenna height of up to 328 feet above average terrain, and generally serve smaller cities and towns or suburbs of larger cities.

      The minimum and maximum facilities requirements for an FM station are determined by its class. FM class designations depend upon the geographic zone in which the transmitter of the FM station is located. In general, commercial FM stations are classified as follows, in order of increasing power and antenna height: Class A, B1, C3, B, C2, C1, C0, and C.

12

      The following table sets forth the market, call letters, FCC license classification, antenna elevation above average terrain (for FM stations only), power and frequency of all owned and operated stations as of February 28, 2006, all pending station acquisitions operated under an LMA as of February 28, 2006 and all other announced pending station acquisitions as of February 28, 2006.

											Height
											Above		Power (in
											Average		Kilowatts)
							Expiration Date		FCC		Terrain
Market	Stations		City of License		Frequency		of License		Class		(in feet)		Day		Night
Abilene, TX		KCDD FM		Hamlin, TX		103.7		August 1, 2013		C		985		98.0		98.0
		KBCY FM		Tye, TX		99.7		August 1, 2013		C1		745		100.0		100.0
		KTLT FM		Anson, TX		98.1		August 1, 2013		C2		292		50.0		50.0
		KHXS FM		Merkel, TX		102.7		August 1, 2013		C1		745		99.2		99.2
Albany, GA		WNUQ FM		Albany, GA		101.7		April 1, 2012		A		299		3.0		3.0
		WEGC FM		Sasser, GA		107.7		April 1, 2012		C3		312		11.5		11.5
		WALG AM		Albany, GA		1590		April 1, 2012		B		N.A.		5.0		1.0
		WJAD FM		Leesburg, GA		103.5		April 1, 2012		C3		463		12.5		12.5
		WKAK FM		Albany, GA		104.5		April 1, 2012		C1		981		98.0		98.0
		WGPC AM		Albany, GA		1450		April 1, 2012		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WQVE FM		Camilla, GA		105.5		April 1, 2012		A		276		6.0		6.0
		WZBN FM		Sylvester, GA		102.1		April 1, 2012		A		259		6.0		6.0
Amarillo, TX		KZRK FM		Canyon, TX		107.9		August 1, 2013		C1		476		100.0		100.0
		KZRK AM		Canyon, TX		1550		August 1, 2013		B		N.A.		1.0		0.2
		KARX FM		Claude, TX		95.7		August 1, 2013		C1		390		100.0		100.0
		KPUR AM		Amarillo, TX		1440		August 1, 2013		B		N.A.		5.0		1.0
		KPUR FM		Canyon, TX		107.1		August 1, 2013		A		315		6.0		6.0
		KQIZ FM		Amarillo, TX		93.1		August 1, 2013		C1		699		100.0		100.0
Appleton Oshkosh, WI		WWWX FM		Oshkosh, WI		96.9		December 1, 2012		A		328		6.0		6.0
		WVBO FM		Winneconne, WI		103.9		(A)		C3		328		6.0		6.0
		WNAM AM		Neenah Menasha, WI		1280		December 1, 2012		B		N.A.		20.0		5.0
		WOSH AM		Oshkosh, WI		1490		December 1, 2012		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WPKR FM		Omro, WI		99.5		December 1, 2012		C2		420		50.0		50.0
Bangor, ME		WQCB FM		Brewer, ME		106.5		April 1, 2006		C		1079		98.0		98.0
		WBZN FM		Old Town, ME		107.3		April 1, 2006		C2		436		50.0		50.0
		WWMJ FM		Ellsworth, ME		95.7		April 1, 2006		B		1030		11.5		11.5
		WEZQ FM		Bangor, ME		92.9		April 1, 2006		B		787		20.0		20.0
		WDEA AM		Ellsworth, ME		1370		April 1, 2006		B		N.A.		5.0		5.0
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX		KSTB FM		Crystal Beach, TX		101.5		(A)		A		184		6.0		6.0
		KQXY FM		Beaumont, TX		94.1		(A)		C1		600.2		100.0		100.0
		KBED AM		Nederland, TX		1510		(A)		D		N.A.		5.0		0.0
		KIKR AM		Beaumont, TX		1450		(A)		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		KTCX FM		Beaumont, TX		102.5		(A)		C2		492		50.0		50.0
		KAYD FM		Silsbee, TX		101.7		August 1, 2013		C3		502		10.5		10.5
Bismarck, ND		KBYZ FM		Bismarck, ND		96.5		April 1, 2013		C		1001		100.0		100.0
		KACL FM		Bismarck, ND		98.7		April 1, 2013		C1		830		100.0		100.0
		KKCT FM		Bismarck, ND		97.5		April 1, 2013		C1		830		100.0		100.0
		KLXX AM		Mandan, ND		1270		April 1, 2013		B		N.A.		1.0		0.3
Blacksburg, VA		WBRW FM		Blacksburg. VA		105.3		October 1, 2011		C3		479		12.0		12.0
		WFNR FM		Christiansburg, VA		100.7		October 1, 2011		A		886		0.8		0.8
		WFNR AM		Blacksburg. VA		710		October 1, 2011		D		N.A.		10.0		1.0
		WPSK FM		Pulaski, VA		107.1		October 1, 2011		C3		1207		1.8		1.8
		WRAD AM		Radford, VA		1460		October 1, 2011		B		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WWBU FM		Radford, VA		101.7		October 1, 2011		A		66		20.0		20.0

13

											Height
											Above		Power (in
											Average		Kilowatts)
							Expiration Date		FCC		Terrain
Market	Stations		City of License		Frequency		of License		Class		(in feet)		Day		Night
Bridgeport, CT		WEBE FM		Westport, CT		107.9		April 1, 2006		B		384		50.0		50.0
		WICC AM		Bridgeport, CT		600		April 1, 2006		B		N.A.		1.0		0.5
Canton, OH		WRQK FM		Canton, OH		106.9		October 1, 2012		B		341		27.5		27.5
Cedar Rapids, IA		KDAT FM		Cedar Rapids, IA		104.5		February 1, 2013		C1		551		100.0		100.0
		KHAK FM		Cedar Rapids, IA		98.1		February 1, 2013		C1		459		100.0		100.0
		KRNA FM		Iowa City, IA		94.1		February 1, 2013		C1		981		100.0		100.0
Columbia, MO		KBXR FM		Columbia, MO		102.3		February 1, 2013		C3		857		3.5		3.5
		KFRU AM		Columbia, MO		1400		February 1, 2013		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		KPLA FM		Columbia, MO		101.5		February 1, 2013		C1		1064		41.0		41.0
		KOQL FM		Ashland, MO		106.1		February 1, 2013		C1		959		69.0		69.0
Columbus-Starkville, MS		WSSO AM		Starkville, MS		1230		June 1, 2012		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WMXU FM		Starkville, MS		106.1		June 1, 2012		C2		502		40.0		40.0
		WSMS FM		Artesia, MS		99.9		June 1, 2012		C2		505		47.0		47.0
		WKOR FM		Columbus, MS		94.9		June 1, 2012		C2		492		50.0		50.0
		WKOR AM		Starkville, MS		980		June 1, 2012		D		N.A.		1.0		0.0
		WJWF AM		Columbus, MS		1400		June 1, 2012		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WMBC FM		Columbus, MS		103.1		June 1, 2012		C2		755		22.0		22.0
Danbury, CT		WRKI FM		Brookfield, CT		95.1		April 1, 2006		B		636		29.5		29.5
		WDBY FM		Patterson, NY		105.5		June 1, 2006		A		610		0.9		0.9
		WINE AM		Brookfield, CT		940		April 1, 2006		D		N.A.		0.7		0.1
		WPUT AM		Brewster, NY		1510		June 1, 2006		D		N.A.		1.0		0.0
Dubuque, IA		KLYV FM		Dubuque, IA		105.3		February 1, 2013		C2		331		50.0		50.0
		KXGE FM		Dubuque, IA		102.3		February 1, 2013		A		308		2.0		2.0
		WDBQ FM		Galena, IL		107.5		December 1, 2012		A		328		3.0		3.0
		WDBQ AM		Dubuque, IA		1490		February 1, 2013		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WJOD FM		Asbury, IA		103.3		February 1, 2013		C3		643		6.6		6.6
Eugene-Springfield, OR		KUJZ FM		Creswell, OR		95.3		(A)		C3		1207		0.6		0.6
		KSCR AM		Eugene, OR		1320		(A)		D		N.A.		1.0		0.1
		KZEL FM		Eugene, OR		96.1		(A)		C		1093		100.0		43.0
		KUGN AM		Eugene, OR		590		(A)		B		N.A.		5.0		5.0
		KEHK FM		Brownsville, OR		102.3		(A)		C1		919		100.0		43.0
		KNRQ FM		Eugene, OR		97.9		(A)		C		1011		100.0		75.0
Faribault-Owatonna, MN		KRFO AM		Owatonna, MN		1390		April 1, 2013		D		N.A.		0.5		0.1
		KRFO FM		Owatonna, MN		104.9		April 1, 2013		A		174		4.7		4.7
		KDHL AM		Faribault, MN		920		April 1, 2013		B		N.A.		5.0		5.0
		KQCL FM		Faribault, MN		95.9		April 1, 2013		A		328		3.0		3.0
Fayetteville, AR		KQSM FM		Bentonville, AR		98.3		June 1, 2012		C1		617		100.0		100.0
		KFAY AM		Farmington, AR		1030		June 1, 2012		B		N.A.		10.0		1.0
		KKEG FM		Fayetteville, AR		92.1		June 1, 2012		C3		531		7.6		7.6
		KAMO FM		Rogers, AR		94.3		June 1, 2012		C2		692		25.1		25.1
		KMCK FM		Siloam Springs, AR		105.7		June 1, 2012		C1		476		100.0		100.0
		KYNG AM		Springdale, AR		1590		June 1, 2012		D		N.A.		2.5		0.1
		KYNF FM		Prairie Grove, AR		94.9		June 1, 2012		C2		761		21.0		21.0
Fayetteville, NC		WRCQ FM		Dunn, NC		103.5		December 1, 2011		C2		502		47.5		47.5
		WFNC FM		Lumberton, NC		102.3		December 1, 2011		A		269		6.0		6.0
		WFNC AM		Fayetteville, NC		640		December 1, 2011		B		N.A.		10.0		1.0
		WQSM FM		Fayetteville, NC		98.1		December 1, 2011		C1		830		100.0		100.0
		WFVL FM		Southern Pines, NC		106.9		December 1, 2011		C2		492		50.0		50.0

14

											Height
											Above		Power (in
											Average		Kilowatts)
							Expiration Date		FCC		Terrain
Market	Stations		City of License		Frequency		of License		Class		(in feet)		Day		Night
Flint, MI		WDZZ FM		Flint, MI		92.7		October 1, 2012		A		256		3.0		3.0
		WRSR FM		Owosso, MI		103.9		October 1, 2012		A		482		2.9		2.9
		WWCK FM		Flint, MI		105.5		October 1, 2012		B1		328		25.0		25.0
		WWCK AM		Flint, MI		1570		October 1, 2012		D		N.A.		1.0		0.1
Florence, SC		WYNN FM		Florence, SC		106.3		December 1, 2011		A		325		6.0		6.0
		WYNN AM		Florence, SC		540		December 1, 2011		B		N.A.		0.3		0.2
		WYMB AM		Manning, SC		920		December 1, 2011		B		N.A.		2.3		1.0
		WCMG FM		Latta, SC		94.3		December 1, 2011		C3		502		10.5		10.5
		WHSC AM		Hartsville, SC		1450		December 1, 2011		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WBZF FM		Hartsville, SC		98.5		December 1, 2011		A		328		3.0		3.0
		WHLZ FM		Marion, SC		100.5		December 1, 2011		C3		354		21.5		21.5
		WMXT FM		Pamplico, SC		102.1		December 1, 2011		C2		479		50.0		50.0
		WWFN FM		Lake City, SC		100.1		December 1, 2011		A		433		3.3		3.3
Fort Smith, AR		KBBQ FM		Van Buren, AR		102.7		June 1, 2012		C2		574		17.0		17.0
		KOMS FM		Poteau, OK		107.3		June 1, 2013		C		1811		100.0		100.0
		KLSZ FM		Fort Smith, AR		100.7		June 1, 2012		C2		459		50.0		50.0
		KAYR AM		Van Buren, AR		1060		June 1, 2012		D		N.A.		0.5		0.0
Fort Walton Beach, FL		WKSM FM		Fort Walton Beach, FL		99.5		February 1, 2012		C2		440		50.0		50.0
		WNCV FM		Niceville, FL		100.3		February 1, 2012		A		440		3.5		3.5
		WYZB FM		Mary Esther, FL		105.5		February 1, 2012		C3		305		25.0		25.0
		WZNS FM		Fort Walton Beach, FL		96.5		February 1, 2012		C1		440		100.0		100.0
		WFTW AM		Fort Walton Beach, FL		1260		February 1, 2012		D		N.A.		2.5		0.1
Grand Junction, CO		KBKL FM		Grand Junction, CO		107.9		April 1, 2013		C		1460		100.0		100.0
		KEKB FM		Fruita, CO		99.9		April 1, 2013		C		1542		79.0		79.0
		KMXY FM		Grand Junction, CO		104.3		April 1, 2013		C		1460		100.0		100.0
		KKNN FM		Delta, CO		95.1		April 1, 2013		C		1424		100.0		100.0
		KEXO AM		Grand Junction, CO		1230		April 1, 2013		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
Green Bay, WI		WOGB FM		Kaukauna, WI		103.1		December 1, 2012		C3		879		3.6		3.6
		WJLW FM		Allouez, WI		106.7		December 1, 2012		C3		328		25.0		25.0
		WDUZ FM		Brillion, WI		107.5		December 1, 2012		C3		879		3.6		3.6
		WQLH FM		Green Bay, WI		98.5		December 1, 2012		C1		499		100.0		100.0
		WDUZ AM		Green Bay, WI		1400		December 1, 2012		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WPCK FM		Denmark, WI		104.9		December 1, 2012		C3		515		10.0		10.0
Harrisburg, PA		WNNK FM		Harrisburg, PA		104.1		August 1, 2006		B		725		22.5		22.5
		WTPA FM		Mechanicsburg, PA		93.5		August 1, 2006		A		719		1.3		1.3
		WWKL FM		Palmyra, PA		92.1		August 1, 2006		A		102		3.3		3.3
		WTCY AM		Harrisburg, PA		1400		August 1, 2006		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
Houston, TX		KFNC FM		Beaumont, TX		97.5		August 1, 2013		C		1,955		100.0		100.0
		KIOL FM		La Porte, TX		103.7		August 1, 2013		C3		427		15		15
Huntsville, AL		WZYP FM		Athens, AL		104.3		April 1, 2012		C		1,115		100.0		100.0
		WHRP FM		Tullahoma, TN		93.3		August 1, 2012		C1		981		100.0		100.0
		WVNN AM		Athens, AL		770		April 1, 2012		B		N.A.		7.0		0.3
		WUMP AM		Madison, AL		730		April 1, 2012		D		N.A.		1.0		0.1
		WWXQ FM		Trinity, AL		92.5		April 1, 2012		A		387		3.1		3.1
		WXQW FM		Meridianville, AL		94.1		April 1, 2012		A		1056		0.4		0.4
Jefferson City, MO		KBBM FM		Jefferson City, MO		100.1		February 1, 2013		C2		601		33.0		33.0
		KJMO FM		Jefferson City, MO		104.1		February 1, 2013		A		348		5.3		5.3
		KLIK AM		Jefferson City, MO		1240		February 1, 2013		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0

15

											Height
											Above		Power (in
											Average		Kilowatts)
							Expiration Date		FCC		Terrain
Market	Stations		City of License		Frequency		of License		Class		(in feet)		Day		Night
Kalamazoo, MI		WKFR FM		Battle Creek, MI		103.3		October 1, 2012		B		482		50.0		50.0
		WRKR FM		Portage, MI		107.7		October 1, 2012		B		485		50.0		50.0
		WKMI AM		Kalamazoo, MI		1360		October 1, 2012		B		N.A.		5.0		1.0
Kansas City, MO		KCHZ FM		Ottawa, KS		95.7		June 1, 2013		C1		981		98.0		98.0
		KMJK FM		Lexington, MO		107.3		February 1, 2013		C		1,184		100.0		100.0
		KRWP FM		Stockton, MO		107.7		February 1, 2013		C3		479		11.7		11.7
Killeen-Temple, TX		KLTD FM		Temple, TX		101.7		August 1, 2013		C3		410		16.6		16.6
		KOOC FM		Belton, TX		106.3		August 1, 2013		C3		489		11.5		11.5
		KSSM FM		Copperas Cove, TX		103.1		August 1, 2012		C3		558		8.6		8.6
		KUSJ FM		Harker Heights, TX		105.5		August 1, 2013		C2		600		33.0		33.0
		KTEM AM		Temple, TX		1400		August 1, 2013		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
Lake Charles, LA		KKGB FM		Sulphur, LA		101.3		June 1, 2012		C3		289		25.0		25.0
		KBIU FM		Lake Charles, LA		103.3		June 1, 2012		C1		488		100.0		100.0
		KYKZ FM		Lake Charles, LA		96.1		June 1, 2012		C		990		100.0		100.0
		KXZZ AM		Lake Charles, LA		1580		June 1, 2012		B		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		KQLK FM		DeRidder, LA		97.9		June 1, 2012		C2		494		50.0		50.0
		KAOK AM		Lake Charles, LA		1400		June, 1 2012		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
Lexington, KY		WVLK AM		Lexington, KY		590		August 1, 2012		B		N.A.		5.0		1.0
		WLXX FM		Lexington, KY		92.9		August 1, 2012		C1		850		100.0		100.0
		WLTO FM		Nicholasville, KY		102.5		August 1, 2012		A		374		4.6		4.6
		WLRO FM		Richmond, KY		101.5		August 1, 2012		C3		541		9.0		9.0
		WXZZ FM		Georgetown, KY		103.3		August 1, 2012		A		328		6.0		6.0
		WCYN-FM		Cynthiana, KY		102.3		August 1, 2012		A		400		3.4		3.4
Macon, GA		WPEZ FM		Jeffersonville, GA		93.7		April 1, 2012		C1		679		100.0		100.0
		WDDO AM		Macon, GA		1240		April 1, 2012		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WAYS AM		Macon, GA		1500		April 1, 2012		D		N.A.		1.0		0.0
		WDEN FM		Macon, GA		99.1		April 1, 2012		C1		581		100.0		100.0
		WIFN FM		Macon, GA		105.5		April 1, 2012		C3		659		6.1		6.1
		WMAC AM		Macon, GA		940		April 1, 2012		B		N.A.		50.0		10.0
		WLZN FM		Macon, GA		92.3		April 1, 2012		A		328		3.0		3.0
		WMGB FM		Montezuma, GA		95.1		April 1, 2012		C2		390		46.0		46.0
Melbourne-Titus-Cocoa, FL		WHKR FM		Rockledge, FL		102.7		February 1, 2012		C2		433		50.0		50.0
		WAOA FM		Melbourne, FL		107.1		February 1, 2012		C1		486		100.0		100.0
		WINT AM		Melbourne, FL		1560		February 1, 2012		D		N.A.		5.0		0.0
		WSJZ FM		Sebastian, FL		95.9		February 1, 2012		C3		289		25.0		25.0
Mobile, AL		WYOK FM		Atmore, AL		104.1		April 1, 2012		C		1555		100.0		100.0
		WGOK AM		Mobile, AL		900		April 1, 2012		B		N.A.		1.0		0.4
		WBLX FM		Mobile, AL		92.9		April 1, 2012		C		1555		98.0		98.0
		WDLT FM		Chickasaw, AL		98.3		April 1, 2012		C2		548		40.0		40.0
		WDLT AM		Fairhope, AL		660		April 1, 2012		B		N.A.		10.0		0.8
		WAVH FM		Daphne, AL		106.5		(A)		C2		449		50.0		50.0
Monroe, MI		WTWR FM		Luna Pier, MI		98.3		October 1, 2012		A		466		1.4		1.4

16

											Height
											Above		Power (in
											Average		Kilowatts)
							Expiration Date		FCC		Terrain
Market	Stations		City of License		Frequency		of License		Class		(in feet)		Day		Night
Montgomery, AL		WMSP AM		Montgomery, AL		740		April 1, 2012		B		N.A.		10.0		0.2
		WNZZ AM		Montgomery, AL		950		April 1, 2012		D		N.A.		1.0		0.4
		WMXS FM		Montgomery, AL		103.3		April 1, 2012		C		1096		100.0		100.0
		WLWI FM		Montgomery, AL		92.3		April 1, 2012		C		1096		100.0		100.0
		WHHY FM		Montgomery, AL		101.9		April 1, 2012		C0		1096		100.0		100.0
		WLWI AM		Montgomery, AL		1440		April 1, 2012		B		N.A.		5.0		1.0
		WXFX FM		Prattville, AL		95.1		April 1, 2012		C2		476		50.0		50.0
Myrtle Beach, SC		WSYN FM		Georgetown, SC		106.5		December 1, 2011		C2		492		50.0		50.0
		WDAI FM		Pawley’s Island, SC		98.5		December 1, 2011		A		666		6.1		6.1
		WJXY FM		Conway, SC		93.9		December 1, 2011		A		420		3.7		3.7
		WXJY FM		Georgetown, SC		93.7		December 1, 2011		A		328		6.0		6.0
		WIQB AM		Conway, SC		1050		December 1, 2011		B		N.A.		5.0		0.5
		WSEA FM		Atlantic Beach, SC		100.3		December 1, 2011		A		476		12.0		12.0
		WYAK FM		Surfside Beach, SC		103.1		December 1, 2011		C3		528		8.0		8.0
Nashville, TN		WQQK FM		Hendersonville, TN		92.1		August 1, 2012		A		462		3.0		3.0
		WNFN FM		Belle Meade, TN		106.7		August 1, 2012		A		774		1.1		1.1
		WRQQ FM		Goodlettsville, TN		97.1		August 1, 2012		C2		518		43.0		43.0
		WSM FM		Nashville, TN		95.5		August 1, 2012		C		1,279		100.0		100.0
		WWTN FM		Manchester, TN		99.7		August 1, 2012		C		1,296		100.0		100.0
Newburgh-Middletown, NY		WALL AM		Middletown, NY		1340		June 1, 2006		C		N.A.		1.0		0.0
		WRRV FM		Middletown, NY		92.7		June 1, 2006		A		269		6.0		6.0
Odessa-Midland, TX		KZBT FM		Midland, TX		93.3		August 1, 2013		C1		440		100.0		100.0
		KODM FM		Odessa, TX		97.9		August 1, 2013		C1		361		100.0		100.0
		KNFM FM		Midland, TX		92.3		August 1, 2013		C		984		100.0		100.0
		KBAT FM		Monahans, TX		99.9		August 1, 2013		C1		574		98.0		98.0
		KMND AM		Midland, TX		1510		August 1, 2013		D		N.A.		2.4		0.0
		KRIL AM		Odessa, TX		1410		August 1, 2013		B		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		KGEE FM		Pecos, TX		97.3		August 1, 2013		C1		413		100.0		100.0
Oxnard-Ventura, CA		KVEN AM		Ventura, CA		1450		December 1, 2013		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		KHAY FM		Ventura, CA		100.7		December 1, 2013		B		1211		39.0		39.0
		KBBY FM		Ventura, CA		95.1		December 1, 2013		B		876		12.5		12.5
Pensacola, FL		WJLQ FM		Pensacola, FL		100.7		February 1, 2012		C		1555		100.0		100.0
		WCOA AM		Pensacola, FL		1370		February 1, 2012		B		N.A.		5.0		5.0
		WRRX FM		Gulf Breeze, FL		106.1		February 1, 2012		A		407		3.9		3.9
Poughkeepsie, NY		WPDH FM		Poughkeepsie, NY		101.5		June 1, 2006		B		1540		4.4		4.4
		WPDA FM		Jeffersonville, NY		106.1		June 1, 2006		A		626		1.6		1.6
		WRRB FM		Arlington, NY		96.9		June 1, 2006		A		1007		0.3		0.3
		WZAD FM		Wurtsboro, NY		97.3		June 1, 2006		A		718		0.6		0.6
		WCZX FM		Hyde Park, NY		97.7		June 1, 2006		A		1030		0.3		0.3
		WEOK AM		Poughkeepsie, NY		1390		June 1, 2006		D		N.A.		5.0		0.1
		WKNY AM		Kingston, NY		1490		June 1, 2006		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WKXP FM		Kingston, NY		94.3		June 1, 2006		A		545		2.3		2.3
Quad Cities, IA		KQCS FM		Bettendorf, IA		93.5		February 1, 2013		A		896		6.0		6.0
		KBEA FM		Muscatine, IA		99.7		February 1, 2013		C1		318		100.0		100.0
		KBOB FM		DeWitt, IA		104.9		December 1, 2012		C3		469		12.5		12.5
		KJOC AM		Davenport, IA		1170		February 1, 2013		B		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WXLP FM		Moline, IL		96.9		December 1, 2012		B		499		50.0		50.0

17

											Height
											Above		Power (in
											Average		Kilowatts)
							Expiration Date		FCC		Terrain
Market	Stations		City of License		Frequency		of License		Class		(in feet)		Day		Night
Rochester, MN		KROC AM		Rochester, MN		1340		April 1, 2013		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		KROC FM		Rochester, MN		106.9		April 1, 2013		C0		1149		100.0		100.0
		KYBA FM		Stewartville, MN		105.3		April 1, 2013		C2		492		50.0		50.0
		KFIL FM		Preston, MN		103.1		April 1, 2013		C3		529		3.5		3.5
		KFIL AM		Preston, MN		1060		April 1, 2013		D		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		KVGO FM		Spring Valley, MN		104.3		April 1, 2013		C3		512		10.0		10.0
		KOLM AM		Rochester, MN		1520		April 1, 2013		B		N.A.		10.0		0.8
		KWWK FM		Rochester, MN		96.5		April 1, 2013		C2		529		43.0		43.0
		KLCX FM		Saint Charles, MN		107.7		April 1, 2013		A		571		2.0		2.0
Rockford, IL		WROK AM		Rockford, IL		1440		December 1, 2012		B		N.A.		5.0		0.3
		WZOK FM		Rockford, IL		97.5		December 1, 2012		B		430		50.0		50.0
		WXXQ FM		Freeport, IL		98.5		December 1, 2012		B1		492		11.0		11.0
		WKGL FM		Loves Park, IL		96.7		December 1, 2012		A		551		2.2		2.2
Santa Barbara, CA		KRUZ FM		Santa Barbara, CA		97.5		(A)		B		2920		16.0		16.0
		KMGQ FM		Goleta, CA		106.3		(A)		A		827		0.1		0.1
		KVYB FM		Santa Barbara, CA		103.3		December 1, 2013		B		2916		105.0		105.0
Savannah, GA		WJCL FM		Savannah, GA		96.5		April 1, 2012		C		988		98.0		98.0
		WIXV FM		Savannah, GA		95.5		April 1, 2012		C1		856		100.0		100.0
		WTYB FM		Springfield, GA		103.9		April 1, 2012		A		328		14.0		14.0
		WBMQ AM		Savannah, GA		630		(A)		B		N.A.		5.0		5.0
		WEAS FM		Savannah, GA		93.1		April 1, 2012		C1		981		97.0		97.0
		WJLG AM		Savannah, GA		900		April 1, 2012		B		N.A.		4.4		0.2
		WZAT FM		Savannah, GA		102.1		April 1, 2012		C		1322		98.0		98.0
Shreveport, LA		KMJJ FM		Shreveport, LA		99.7		June 1, 2012		C2		463		50.0		50.0
		KRMD FM		Oil City, LA		101.1		June 1, 2012		C		1119		98.0		98.0
		KRMD AM		Shreveport, LA		1340		June 1, 2012		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		KVMA FM		Shreveport, LA		102.9		June 1, 2012		C2		534		42.0		42.0
		KQHN FM		Magnolia, AR		107.9		June 1, 2012		C1		351		100.0		100.0
Sioux Falls, SD		KYBB FM		Canton, SD		102.7		April 1, 2013		C2		486		50.0		50.0
		KIKN FM		Salem, SD		100.5		April 1, 2013		C1		942		100.0		100.0
		KKLS FM		Sioux Falls, SD		104.7		April 1, 2013		C1		982		100.0		100.0
		KMXC FM		Sioux Falls, SD		97.3		April 1, 2013		C1		840		100.0		100.0
		KSOO AM		Sioux Falls, SD		1140		April 1, 2013		B		N.A.		10.0		5.0
		KXRB AM		Sioux Falls, SD		1000		April 1, 2005		D		N.A.		10.0		0.1
Tallahassee, FL		WHBX FM		Tallahassee, FL		96.1		(A)		C2		479		37.0		37.0
		WBZE FM		Tallahassee, FL		98.9		February 1, 2012		C1		604		100.0		100.0
		WHBT AM		Tallahassee, FL		1410		February 1, 2012		B		N.A.		5.0		0.0
		WGLF FM		Tallahassee, FL		104.1		February 1, 2012		C		1394		90.0		90.0
		WWLD FM		Cairo, GA		102.3		(A)		C2		495		27.0		27.0
Toledo, OH		WKKO FM		Toledo, OH		99.9		October 1, 2012		B		499		50.0		50.0
		WRQN FM		Bowling Green, OH		93.5		October 1, 2012		A		397		4.1		4.1
		WTOD AM		Toledo, OH		1560		October 1, 2012		D		N.A.		5.0		0.0
		WWWM FM		Sylvania, OH		105.5		October 1, 2012		A		390		4.3		4.3
		WLQR AM		Toledo, OH		1470		October 1, 2012		B		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WXKR FM		Port Clinton, OH		94.5		October 1, 2012		B		630		30.0		30.0
		WRWK FM		Delta, OH		106.5		October 1, 2012		A		328		3.0		3.0

18

											Height
											Above		Power (in
											Average		Kilowatts)
							Expiration Date		FCC		Terrain
Market	Stations		City of License		Frequency		of License		Class		(in feet)		Day		Night
Topeka, KS		KDVV FM		Topeka, KS		100.3		June 1, 2013		C		984		100.0		100.0
		KMAJ FM		Topeka, KS		107.7		June 1, 2013		C		988		100.0		100.0
		KMAJ AM		Topeka, KS		1440		June 1, 2013		B		N.A.		5.0		1.0
		KTOP AM		Topeka, KS		1490		June 1, 2013		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		KQTP FM		St. Marys, KS		102.9		June 1, 2013		C2		318		50.0		50.0
		KWIC FM		Topeka, KS		99.3		June 1, 2013		A		292		6.0		6.0
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA		KOEL FM		Cedar Falls, IA		98.5		February 1, 2013		C3		423		15.1		15.1
		KKHQ FM		Oelwein, IA		92.3		February 1, 2013		C		1968		100.0		100.0
		KOEL AM		Oelwein, IA		950		February 1, 2013		B		N.A.		5.0		0.5
		KCRR FM		Grundy Center, IA		97.7		February 1, 2013		C3		407		16.0		16.0
Westchester County, NY		WFAS AM		White Plains, NY		1230		June 1, 2006		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WFAS FM		White Plains, NY		103.9		June 1, 2006		A		669		0.6		0.6
		WFAF FM		Mount Kisco, NY		106.3		June 1, 2006		A		440		1.4		1.4
Wichita Falls, TX		KLUR FM		Wichita Falls, TX		99.9		August 1, 2013		C1		808		100.0		100.0
		KQXC FM		Wichita Falls, TX		103.9		August 1, 2013		A		312		4.5		4.5
		KYYI FM		Burkburnett, TX		104.7		August 1, 2013		C		1017		100.0		100.0
		KOLI FM		Electra, TX		94.9		August 1, 2013		C2		492		50.0		50.0
Wilmington, NC		WWQQ FM		Wilmington, NC		101.3		December 1, 2011		C2		545		40.0		40.0
		WGNI FM		Wilmington, NC		102.7		December 1, 2011		C1		981		100.0		100.0
		WMNX FM		Wilmington, NC		97.3		December 1, 2011		C1		883		100.0		100.0
		WKXS FM		Leland, NC		94.1		December 1, 2011		A		148		5.0		5.0
		WAAV AM		Leland, NC		980		December 1, 2011		B		N.A.		5.0		5.0
Youngstown, OH		WBBW AM		Youngstown, OH		1240		October 1, 2012		C		N.A.		1.0		1.0
		WPIC AM		Sharon, PA		790		August 1, 2006		D		N.A.		1.0		0.0
		WYFM FM		Sharon, PA		102.9		August 1, 2006		B		604		33.0		33.0
		WHOT FM		Youngstown, PA		101.1		October 1, 2012		B		705		24.5		24.5
		WLLF FM		Mercer, PA		96.7		August 1, 2006		A		486		1.4		1.4
		WWIZ FM		Mercer, PA		103.9		August 1, 2006		A		299		3.0		3.0
		WQXK FM		Salem, OH		105.1		October 1, 2012		B		446		88.0		88.0
		WSOM AM		Salem, OH		600		October 1, 2012		D		N.A.		1.0		0.0

(A) License renewal application pending.

      We also own and operate five radio stations in various locations throughout the English-speaking Eastern Caribbean, including Trinidad, St. Kitts-Nevis, St. Lucia, Montserrat and Antigua-Barbuda, and we have been granted licenses for FM stations covering Barbados and Tortola, British Virgin Islands. These Eastern Caribbean stations are not regulated by the FCC.

      Regulatory Approvals. The Communications Laws prohibit the assignment or transfer of control of a broadcast license without the prior approval of the FCC. In determining whether to grant an application for assignment or transfer of control of a broadcast license, the Communications Act requires the FCC to find that the assignment or transfer would serve the public interest. The FCC considers a number of factors in making this determination, including (1) compliance with various rules limiting common ownership of media properties, (2) the financial and “character” qualifications of the assignee or transferee (including those parties holding an “attributable” interest in the assignee or transferee), (3) compliance with the Communications Act’s foreign ownership restrictions, and (4) compliance with other Communications Laws, including those related to programming and filing requirements.

      As discussed in greater detail below, the FCC also reviews the effect of proposed assignments and transfers of broadcast licenses on economic competition and diversity. See “— Antitrust and Market Concentration Considerations.”

19

      Two of our transactions that are pending at the FCC have been challenged by third parties. In one transaction, an application is pending before the FCC with respect to our proposed sale of an AM station in Muskegon, Michigan. The FCC staff has raised a question concerning a prior owner’s proposed retention of a related authorization for that station, and the prior owner, in turn, has raised questions about our conduct in acquiring the station. In another transaction, we have four assignment applications pending before the FCC by which we are seeking to exchange two FM stations in the Ft. Walton Beach, Florida market for two other stations (one of which is in the Ft. Walton Beach market and one of which has FCC authorization to relocate to the Ft. Walton Beach market). Those applications have been challenged by a third party who has raised multiple ownership and ownership concentration issues.

      We cannot predict the final outcome of the foregoing matters but we do not believe that any adverse decision in either case will have a material adverse impact on our overall operations taken as a whole.

      Ownership Matters. The Communications Act restricts us from having more than one-fourth of our capital stock owned or voted by non-U.S. persons, foreign governments or non-U.S. corporations. We are required to take appropriate steps to monitor the citizenship of our stockholders, such as through representative samplings on a periodic basis, to provide a reasonable basis for certifying compliance with the foreign ownership restrictions of the Communications Act.

      The Communications Laws also generally restrict (1) the number of radio stations one person or entity may own, operate or control in a local market, (2) the common ownership, operation or control of radio broadcast stations and television broadcast stations serving the same local market, and (3) the common ownership, operation or control of a radio broadcast station and a daily newspaper serving the same local market.

      None of these multiple and cross ownership rules requires any change in our current ownership of radio broadcast stations or precludes consummation of our pending acquisitions. The Communications Laws will limit the number of additional stations that we may acquire in the future in our existing markets as well as new markets.

      Because of these multiple and cross ownership rules, a purchaser of our voting stock who acquires an “attributable” interest in us (as discussed below) may violate the Communications Laws if such purchaser also has an attributable interest in other radio or television stations, or in daily newspapers, depending on the number and location of those radio or television stations or daily newspapers. Such a purchaser also may be restricted in the companies in which it may invest to the extent that those investments give rise to an attributable interest. If one of our attributable stockholders violates any of these ownership rules, we may be unable to obtain from the FCC one or more authorizations needed to conduct our radio station business and may be unable to obtain FCC consents for certain future acquisitions.

      The FCC generally applies its television/radio/newspaper cross-ownership rules and its broadcast multiple ownership rules by considering the “attributable” or cognizable, interests held by a person or entity. With some exceptions, a person or entity will be deemed to hold an attributable interest in a radio station, television station or daily newspaper if the person or entity serves as an officer, director, partner, stockholder, member, or, in certain cases, a debt holder of a company that owns that station or newspaper. Whether that interest is attributable and thus subject to the FCC’s multiple ownership rules is determined by the FCC’s attribution rules. If an interest is attributable, the FCC treats the person or entity who holds that interest as the “owner” of the radio station, television station or daily newspaper in question, and that interest thus counts against the person in determining compliance with the FCC’s ownership rules.

      With respect to a corporation, officers, directors and persons or entities that directly or indirectly hold 5% or more of the corporation’s voting stock (20% or more of such stock in the case of insurance companies, investment companies, bank trust departments and certain other “passive investors” that hold such stock for investment purposes only) generally are attributed with ownership of the radio stations, television stations and daily newspapers owned by the corporation. As discussed below, participation in an LMA or a JSA also may result in an attributable interest. See “— Local Marketing Agreements” and “— Joint Sales Agreements.”

20

      With respect to a partnership (or limited liability company), the interest of a general partner is attributable, as is the interest of any limited partner (or limited liability company member) who is “materially involved” in the media-related activities of the partnership (or limited liability company). The following interests generally are not attributable: (1) debt instruments, non-voting stock, options and warrants for voting stock, partnership interests, or membership interests that have not yet been exercised; (2) limited partnership or limited liability company interests where (a) the limited partner or member is not “materially involved” in the media-related activities of the partnership or limited liability company, and (b) the limited partnership agreement or limited liability company agreement expressly “insulates” the limited partner or member from such material involvement by inclusion of provisions specified by the FCC; and (3) holders of less than 5% of an entity’s voting stock. Non-voting equity and debt interests which, in the aggregate, constitute more than 33% of a station’s “enterprise value,” which consists of the total equity and debt capitalization, are considered attributable in certain circumstances.

      On June 2, 2003, the FCC adopted new rules and policies (the “New Rules”) which would modify the ownership rules and policies then in effect (the “Current Rules”). Among other changes, the New Rules would (1) change the methodology to determine the boundaries of radio markets, (2) require that JSAs involving radio stations (but not television stations) be deemed to be an attributable ownership interest under certain circumstances, (3) authorize the common ownership of radio stations and daily newspapers under certain specified circumstances, and (4) eliminate the procedural policy of “flagging” assignment or transfer of control applications that raised potential anticompetitive concerns (namely, those applications that would permit the buyer to control 50% or more of the radio advertising dollars in the market, or would permit two entities (including the buyer), collectively, to control 70% or more of the radio advertising dollars in the market). Certain private parties challenged the New Rules in court, and the court issued an order which prevented the New Rules from going into effect until the court issued a decision on the challenges. On June 24, 2004, the court issued a decision which upheld some of the FCC’s New Rules (for the most part, those that relate to radio) and concluded that other New Rules (for the most part, those that relate to television and newspapers) required further explanation or modification. The court left in place, however, the order which precluded all of the New Rules from going into effect. On September 3, 2004, the court issued a further order which granted the FCC’s request to allow certain New Rules relating to radio to go into effect. The New Rules that became effective (1) changed the definition of the “radio market” for those markets that are rated by Arbitron, (2) modified the Current Rules method for defining a radio market in those markets that are not rated by Arbitron, and (3) made JSAs an attributable ownership interest under certain circumstances.

      Programming and Operation. The Communications Act requires broadcasters to serve the “public interest.” Broadcasters are required to present programming that is responsive to community problems, needs and interests and to maintain certain records demonstrating such responsiveness. Complaints from listeners concerning a station’s programming may be filed at any time and will be considered by the FCC both at the time they are filed and in connection with a licensee’s renewal application. Stations also must follow various FCC rules that regulate, among other things, political advertising, the broadcast of obscene or indecent programming, sponsorship identification, the broadcast of contests and lotteries, and technical operations (including limits on radio frequency radiation). Failure to observe these or other rules and policies can result in the imposition of various sanctions, including monetary forfeitures, the grant of a “short-term” (less than the maximum term) license renewal or, for particularly egregious violations, the denial of a license renewal application or the revocation of a station license.

      Local Marketing Agreements. A number of radio stations, including certain of our stations, have entered into LMAs. In a typical LMA, the licensee of a station makes available, for a fee, airtime on its station to a party which supplies programming to be broadcast during that airtime, and collects revenues from advertising aired during such programming. LMAs are subject to compliance with the antitrust laws and the Communications Laws, including the requirement that the licensee must maintain independent control over the station and, in particular, its personnel, programming, and finances. The FCC has held that such agreements do not violate the Communications Laws as long as the licensee of the station

21

receiving programming from another station maintains ultimate responsibility for, and control over, station operations and otherwise ensures compliance with the Communications Laws.

      A station that brokers more than 15% of the weekly programming hours on another station in its market will be considered to have an attributable ownership interest in the brokered station for purposes of the FCC’s ownership rules. As a result, a radio station may not enter into an LMA that allows it to program more than 15% of the weekly programming hours of another station in the same market that it could not own under the FCC’s multiple ownership rules.

      Joint Sales Agreements. From time to time, radio stations, including one of our stations, enter into JSAs. A typical JSA authorizes one station to sell another station’s advertising time and retain the revenue from the sale of that airtime. A JSA typically includes a periodic payment to the station whose airtime is being sold (which may include a share of the revenue being collected from the sale of airtime). Like LMAs, JSAs are subject to compliance with antitrust laws and the Communications Laws, including the requirement that the licensee must maintain independent control over the station and, in particular, its personnel, programming, and finances. The FCC has held that such agreements do not violate the Communications Laws as long as the licensee of the station whose time is being sold by another station maintains ultimate responsibility for, and control over, station operations and otherwise ensures compliance with the Communications Laws.

      Under the FCC’s New Rules, a radio station that sells more than 15% of the weekly advertising time of another radio station in the same market will be attributed with the ownership of that other station. In that situation, a radio station cannot have a JSA with another radio station in the same market if the FCC’s ownership rules would otherwise prohibit that common ownership.

      New Services. In 1997, the FCC awarded two licenses to separate entities that authorize the licensees to provide satellite-delivered digital audio radio services. Both licensees have launched their respective satellite-delivered digital radio service.

      Digital technology also may be used by terrestrial radio broadcast stations on their existing frequencies. In October 2002, the FCC released a Report and Order in which it selected in-band, on channel (“IBOC”) as the technology that will permit terrestrial radio stations to introduce digital operations. The FCC now will permit operating radio stations to commence digital operation immediately on an interim basis using the IBOC systems developed by iBiquity Digital Corporation (“iBiquity”), called HD Radio^tm. In March 2004, the FCC (1) approved an FM radio station’s use of two separate antennas (as opposed to a single hybrid antenna) to provide both analog and digital signals and (2) released a Public Notice seeking comment on a proposal by the National Association of Broadcasters to allow all AM stations with nighttime service to provide digital service at night. In April 2004, the FCC inaugurated a rule making proceeding to establish technical, service, and licensing rules for digital broadcasting. The inauguration of digital broadcasts by FM and perhaps AM stations requires us to make additional expenditures. On December 21, 2004, we entered into an agreement with iBiquity pursuant to which we committed to implement HD Radio^tm systems on 240 of our stations by June, 2012. In exchange for reduced license fees and other consideration, we, along with other broadcasters, purchased perpetual licenses to utilize iBiquity’s HD Radio^tm technology. We are presently working with equipment manufacturers to roll out such technology within our markets in accordance with our contractual commitments. We cannot predict at this juncture, however, how successful our implementation of HD Radio^tm technology within our platform will be, or how that implementation will affect our competitive position.

      In January 2000, the FCC released a Report and Order adopting rules for a new low power FM radio service consisting of two classes of stations, one with a maximum power of 100 watts and the other with a maximum power of 10 watts. The FCC has limited ownership and operation of low power FM stations to persons and entities which do not currently have an attributable interest in any FM station and has required that low power FM stations be operated on a non-commercial educational basis. The FCC has granted numerous construction permits for low power FM stations. We cannot predict what impact low power FM radio will have on our operations. Adverse effects of the new low power FM service on our

22

operations could include interference with our stations and competition by low power stations for listeners and revenues.

      In addition, from time to time Congress and the FCC have considered, and may in the future consider and adopt, new laws, regulations and policies regarding a wide variety of matters that could, directly or indirectly, affect the operation, ownership and profitability of our radio stations, result in the loss of audience share and advertising revenues for our radio stations, and affect the ability of Cumulus to acquire additional radio stations or finance such acquisitions.

      Antitrust and Market Concentration Considerations. Potential future acquisitions, to the extent they meet specified size thresholds, will be subject to applicable waiting periods and possible review under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”), by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission, either of whom can be required to evaluate a transaction to determine whether that transaction should be challenged under the federal antitrust laws. Transactions are subject to the HSR Act only if the acquisition price or fair market value of the stations to be acquired is $50 million or more. Most of our acquisitions have not met this threshold. Acquisitions that are not required to be reported under the HSR Act may still be investigated by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission under the antitrust laws before or after consummation. At any time before or after the consummation of a proposed acquisition, the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission could take such action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary, including seeking to enjoin the acquisition or seeking divestiture of the business acquired or certain of our other assets. The Department of Justice has reviewed numerous radio station acquisitions where an operator proposes to acquire additional stations in its existing markets or multiple stations in new markets, and has challenged a number of such transactions. Some of these challenges have resulted in consent decrees requiring the sale of certain stations, the termination of LMAs or other relief. In general, the Department of Justice has more closely scrutinized radio mergers and acquisitions resulting in local market shares in excess of 35% of local radio advertising revenues, depending on format, signal strength and other factors. There is no precise numerical rule, however, and certain transactions resulting in more than 35% revenue shares have not been challenged, while certain other transactions may be challenged based on other criteria such as audience shares in one or more demographic groups as well as the percentage of revenue share. We estimate that we have more than a 35% share of radio advertising revenues in many of our markets.

      We are aware that the Department of Justice commenced, and subsequently discontinued, investigations of several of our prior acquisitions. In addition, it has most recently requested information regarding our proposed acquisition of two radio stations in Ft. Walton Beach, Florida. The Department of Justice can be expected to continue to enforce the antitrust laws in this manner, and there can be no assurance that one or more of our pending or future acquisitions are not or will not be the subject of an investigation or enforcement action by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission. Similarly, there can be no assurance that the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission or the FCC will not prohibit such acquisitions, require that they be restructured, or in appropriate cases, require that we divest stations we already own in a particular market. In addition, private parties may under certain circumstances bring legal action to challenge an acquisition under the antitrust laws.

      As part of its review of certain radio station acquisitions, the Department of Justice has stated publicly that it believes that commencement of operations under LMAs, JSAs and other similar agreements customarily entered into in connection with radio station ownership transfers prior to the expiration of the waiting period under the HSR Act could violate the HSR Act. In connection with acquisitions subject to the waiting period under the HSR Act, we will not commence operation of any affected station to be acquired under an LMA, a JSA, or similar agreement until the waiting period has expired or been terminated.

23

Executive Officers of the Company

      The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers as of February 28, 2005:

Name	Age		Position(s)
Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.		44	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
John G. Pinch		57	Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Martin R. Gausvik		49	Officer and Treasurer
John W. Dickey		39	Executive Vice President

      Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. has served as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer since December 2000, and as a Director since March 1998. Mr. Dickey was one of our founders and initial investors, and served as our Executive Vice Chairman from March 1998 to December 2000. Mr. Dickey is a nationally regarded consultant on radio strategy and the author of The Franchise — Building Radio Brands, published by the National Association of Broadcasters, one of the industry’s leading texts on competition and strategy. Mr. Dickey also serves as a member of the National Association of Broadcasters Radio Board of Directors. He holds Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts degrees from Stanford University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard University. Mr. Dickey is the brother of John W. Dickey.

      John G. Pinch has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since December 2000. Mr. Pinch joined us effective December 1, 2000, after serving as the President of Clear Channel International Radio (“CCU International”) (NYSE:CCU). At rapidly growing CCU International, Mr. Pinch was responsible for the management of all CCU radio operations outside of the United States, which included over 300 properties in 9 countries. Mr. Pinch is a 30 year broadcast veteran and has previously served as Owner/President of WTVK-TV Ft. Myers-Naples Florida, General Manager of WMTX-FM/WHBO-AM Tampa Florida, General Manager/Owner of WKLH-FM Milwaukee, and General Manager of WXJY Milwaukee.

      Martin R. Gausvik is our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Gausvik joined us effective May 29, 2000 and is a 20-year veteran of the radio industry, having served as Vice President Finance for Jacor Communications from 1996 until the merger of Jacor’s 250 radio station group with Clear Channel Communications in May 1999. More recently, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Latin Communications Group, the operator of 17 radio stations serving major markets in the western United States. Prior to joining Jacor, from 1984 to 1996, Mr. Gausvik held various accounting and financial positions with Taft Broadcasting, including Controller of Taft’s successor company, Citicasters.

      John W. Dickey is our Executive Vice President and directs our programming, marketing, promotion and engineering. Mr. Dickey joined us in 1998 and, prior to that, served as the Director of Programming for Midwestern Broadcasting from 1990 to 1998. Mr. Dickey holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Stanford University. Mr. Dickey is the brother of Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.

Available Information

      Our Internet site address is www.cumulus.com. On our site, we have made available, free of charge, our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and our proxy statement. We also provide a link to an independent third-party Internet site, which makes available, free of charge, our other filings with the SEC, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

24

Item 1A.     Risk Factors

      Many statements contained in this report are forward-looking in nature. These statements are based on our current plans, intentions or expectations, and actual results could differ materially as we cannot guarantee that we will achieve these plans, intentions or expectations. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those specifically identified below.

Risks Related to Our Business

We operate in a very competitive business environment.

      The radio broadcasting industry is very competitive. Our stations compete for listeners and advertising revenues directly with other radio stations within their respective markets, and some of the owners of those competing stations may have greater financial resources than we do. Our stations also compete with other media, such as newspapers, magazines, cable and broadcast television, outdoor advertising, satellite radio, the Internet and direct mail. In addition, many of our stations compete with groups of two or more radio stations operated by a single operator in the same market.

      Audience ratings and market shares fluctuate, and any adverse change in a particular market could have a material adverse effect on the revenue of stations located in that market. While we already compete with other stations with comparable programming formats in many of our markets, any one of our stations could suffer a reduction in ratings or revenue and could require increased promotion and other expenses, and, consequently, could have a lower Station Operating Income, if:

•  another radio station in the market were to convert its programming format to a format similar to our station or launch aggressive promotional campaigns;

•  a new station were to adopt a competitive format; or

•  an existing competitor were to strengthen its operations.

      The Telecom Act allows for the consolidation of ownership of radio broadcasting stations in the markets in which we operate or may operate in the future. Some competing consolidated owners may be larger and have substantially more financial and other resources than we do. In addition, increased consolidation in our target markets may result in greater competition for acquisition properties and a corresponding increase in purchase prices we pay for these properties.

A decrease in our market ratings or market share can adversely affect our revenues.

      The success of each of our radio stations, or station clusters, is primarily dependent upon its share of the overall advertising revenue within its market. Although we believe that each of our stations or clusters can compete effectively in its market, we cannot be sure that any of our stations can maintain or increase its current audience ratings or market share. In addition to competition from other radio stations and other media, shifts in population, demographics, audience tastes and other factors beyond our control could cause us to lose our audience ratings or market share. Our advertising revenue may suffer if any of our stations cannot maintain its audience ratings or market share.

We must respond to the rapid changes in technology, services and standards that characterize our industry in order to remain competitive.

      The radio broadcasting industry is subject to technological change, evolving industry standards and the emergence of new media technologies and services. In some cases, our ability to compete will be dependent on our acquisition of new technologies and our provision of new services, and we cannot assure you that we will have the resources to acquire those new technologies or provide those new services; in

25

other cases, the introduction of new technologies and services could increase competition and have an adverse effect on our revenue. Recent new media technologies and services include the following:

•  audio programming by cable television systems, direct broadcast satellite systems, Internet content providers (both landline and wireless), Internet-based audio radio services, satellite delivered digital audio radio service and other digital audio broadcast formats;

•  HD Radio^tm digital radio, which could provide multi-channel, multi-format digital radio services in the same bandwidth currently occupied by traditional AM and FM radio services; and

•  low power FM radio, which could result in additional FM radio broadcast stations in markets where we have stations.

      We also cannot assure you that we will continue to have the resources to acquire other new technologies or to introduce new services that could compete with other new technologies. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that competition arising from new technologies may have on the radio broadcasting industry or on our business.

We face many unpredictable business risks that could have a material adverse effect on our future operations.

      Our operations are subject to many business risks, including certain risks that specifically influence the radio broadcasting industry. These include:

•  changing economic conditions, both generally and relative to the radio broadcasting industry in particular;

•  shifts in population, listenership, demographics or audience tastes;

•  the level of competition from existing or future technologies for advertising revenues, including, but not limited to, other radio stations, satellite radio, television stations, newspapers, the Internet, and other entertainment and communications media; and

•  changes in laws as well as changes in governmental regulations and policies and actions of federal regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission and the FCC.

      Given the inherent unpredictability of these variables, we cannot with any degree of certainty predict what effect, if any, these risks will have on our future operations. Any one or more of these variables may have a material adverse effect on our future operations.

There are risks associated with our acquisition strategy.

      We intend to continue to grow through internal expansion and by acquiring radio station clusters and individual radio stations primarily in mid-size markets. We cannot predict whether we will be successful in pursuing these acquisitions or what the consequences of these acquisitions will be. Consummation of our pending acquisitions and any acquisitions in the future are subject to various conditions, such as compliance with FCC and antitrust regulatory requirements. The FCC requirements include:

•  approval of license assignments and transfers;

•  limits on the number of stations a broadcaster may own in a given local market; and

•  other rules or policies, such as the ownership attribution rules, that could limit our ability to acquire stations in certain markets where one or more of our stockholders has other media interests.

      The antitrust regulatory requirements include:

•  filing with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, referred to as the HSR Act, where applicable;

26

•  expiration or termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act; and

•  possible review by the U.S. Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission of antitrust issues under the HSR Act or otherwise.

      We cannot be certain that any of these conditions will be satisfied. In addition, the FCC has asserted the authority to review levels of local radio market concentration as part of its acquisition approval process, even where proposed assignments would comply with the numerical limits on local radio station ownership in the FCC’s rules and the Communications Act of 1934, referred to as the Communications Act.

      Our acquisition strategy involves numerous other risks, including risks associated with:

•  identifying acquisition candidates and negotiating definitive purchase agreements on satisfactory terms;

•  integrating operations and systems and managing a large and geographically diverse group of stations;

•  diverting our management’s attention from other business concerns;

•  potentially losing key employees at acquired stations; and

•  the diminishing number of properties available for sale in mid-size markets.

      We cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully integrate our acquisitions or manage the resulting business effectively, or that any acquisition will achieve the benefits that we anticipate. In addition, we are not certain that we will be able to acquire properties at valuations as favorable as those of previous acquisitions. Depending upon the nature, size and timing of potential future acquisitions, we may be required to raise additional financing in order to consummate additional acquisitions. We cannot assure you that our debt agreements will permit the necessary additional financing or that additional financing will be available to us or, if available, that financing would be on terms acceptable to our management.

We may be restricted in pursuing certain strategic acquisitions because of our agreement with CMP.

      Under an agreement that we will enter into with CMP and the other investors in CMP in connection with the formation of CMP, we have agreed to allow CMP the right to pursue first any business opportunity primarily involving the top-50 radio markets in the United States. We are allowed to pursue such business opportunities only after CMP has declined to pursue them. As a result, we may be limited in our ability to pursue strategic acquisitions or alternatives primarily involving large-sized markets (including opportunities that primarily involve large-sized markets but also involve mid-sized markets) that may present attractive opportunities for us in the future.

We have written off, and could in the future be required to write off, a significant portion of the fair market value of our FCC broadcast licenses and goodwill, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

      As of December 31, 2005, our FCC licenses and goodwill comprise 87% of our assets. Each year, we are required by SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, to assess the fair market value of our FCC broadcast licenses and goodwill to determine whether the fair market value of those assets is impaired. In 2005, we recorded impairment charges of approximately $264.1 million in order to reduce the carrying value of certain broadcast licenses and goodwill to their respective fair market values. Our future impairment reviews could result in additional impairment charges. Such additional impairment charges would reduce our reported earnings for the periods in which they are recorded.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by a downturn in the U.S. economy or in the economies of the markets in which we operate.

      Revenue generated by our radio stations depends primarily upon the sale of advertising. Advertising expenditures, which we believe to be largely a discretionary business expense, generally tend to decline

27

during an economic recession or downturn. Furthermore, because a substantial portion of our revenue is derived from local advertisers, our ability to generate advertising revenue in specific markets is directly affected by local or regional economic conditions. Consequently, a recession or downturn in the national economy or the economy of an individual geographic market in which we own or operate stations could adversely affect our advertising revenue and, therefore, our results of operations. Our broadcasting revenues could be materially adversely affected by recessions, which may be triggered by economic forces such as the business cycle or by cataclysmic human events. Future acts of war and terrorism against the United States, and the country’s response thereto, could cause our advertising revenues to decline due to advertising cancellations, delays or defaults in payment for advertising time, and the adverse impact on the general economic activity in the United States.

      Even in the absence of a general recession or downturn in the economy, an individual business sector that tends to spend more on advertising than other sectors might be forced to reduce its advertising expenditures if that sector experiences a downturn. If that sector’s spending represents a significant portion of our advertising revenues, any reduction in its expenditures may affect our revenue.

We are dependent on key personnel.

      Our business is managed by a small number of key management and operating personnel, and our loss of one or more of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business. We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel and to expand, train and manage our employee base. We have entered into employment agreements with some of our key management personnel that include provisions restricting their ability to compete with us under specified circumstances.

      We also employ several on-air personalities with large loyal audiences in their individual markets. On occasion, we enter into employment agreements with these personalities to protect our interests in those relationships that we believe to be valuable. The loss of one or more of these personalities could result in a short-term loss of audience share in that particular market.

The broadcasting industry is subject to extensive and changing Federal regulation.

      The radio broadcasting industry is subject to extensive regulation by the FCC under the Communications Act of 1934. We are required to obtain licenses from the FCC to operate our stations. Licenses are normally granted for a term of eight years and are renewable. Although the vast majority of FCC radio station licenses are routinely renewed, we cannot assure you that the FCC will grant our existing or future renewal applications or that the renewals will not include conditions out of the ordinary course. The non-renewal or renewal with conditions, of one or more of our licenses could have a material adverse effect on us.

      We must also comply with the extensive FCC regulations and policies in the ownership and operation of our radio stations. FCC regulations limit the number of radio stations that a licensee can own in a market, which could restrict our ability to acquire radio stations that would be material to our financial performance in a particular market or overall.

      The FCC also requires radio stations to comply with certain technical requirements to limit interference between two or more radio stations. Despite those limitations, a dispute could arise whether another station is improperly interfering with the operation of one of our stations or another radio licensee could complain to the FCC that one our stations is improperly interfering with that licensee’s station. There can be no assurance as to how the FCC might resolve that dispute. These FCC regulations and others may change over time, and we cannot assure you that those changes would not have a material adverse effect on us.

28

In recent years, the FCC has engaged in more vigorous enforcement of its indecency rules against the broadcast industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

      FCC regulations prohibit the broadcast of “obscene” material at any time, and “indecent” material between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. The FCC has recently increased its enforcement efforts with respect to these regulations. Further, Congress has introduced legislation that would substantially increase the penalties for broadcasting indecent programming and potentially subject broadcasters to license revocation, renewal or qualification proceedings in the event that they broadcast indecent material. We may in the future become subject to inquiries or proceedings related to our stations’ broadcast of allegedly indecent or obscene material. To the extent that such an inquiry or proceeding results in the imposition of fines, a settlement with the FCC, revocation of any of our station licenses or denials of license renewal applications, our results of operation and business could be materially adversely affected.

We are required to obtain prior FCC approval for each radio station acquisition.

      The acquisition of a radio station requires the prior approval of the FCC. To obtain that approval, we would have to file a transfer of control or assignment application with the FCC. The Communications Act and FCC rules allow members of the public and other interested parties to file petitions to deny or other objections to the FCC grant of any transfer or assignment application. The FCC could rely on those objections or its own initiative to deny a transfer or assignment application or to require changes in the transaction as a condition to having the application granted. The FCC could also change its existing rules and policies to reduce the number of stations that we would be permitted to acquire in some markets. For these and other reasons, there can be no assurance that the FCC will approve potential future acquisitions that we deem material to our business.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our business, remain in compliance with debt covenants and make payments on our indebtedness.

      As of December 31, 2005, our long-term debt, including the current portion, was $569.0 million, representing approximately 97% of our stockholders’ equity. Our credit facilities have interest and principal repayment obligations that are substantial in amount.

      Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences for you, including:

•  requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;

•  exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates as certain of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest;

•  increasing our vulnerability to general economic downturns and adverse industry conditions;

•  limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and

•  limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and placing us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors who have less debt.

•  restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures;

      We and our restricted subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, subject to the restrictions contained in our credit facilities. If new indebtedness is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

29

The credit agreement governing our credit facility imposes significant restrictions on us.

      Our credit agreement limits or restricts, among other things, our ability to:

•  incur additional indebtedness or grant additional liens or security interests in our assets;

•  pay dividends, make payments on certain types of indebtedness or make other restricted payments;

•  make particular types of investments or enter into speculative hedging agreements;

•  enter into some types of transactions with affiliates;

•  merge or consolidate with any other person or make changes to our organizational documents or other material agreement to which we are a party;

•  sell, assign, transfer, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of our assets (except within certain limits) or enter into sale-leaseback transactions; or

•  make capital expenditures.

      Our credit agreement also requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and to satisfy certain financial condition tests. Our ability to meet those financial ratios and financial condition tests can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot be sure that we will maintain those ratios or meet those tests. A breach of any of these restrictions could result in a default under our debt agreements. Our lenders have taken security interests in substantially all of our consolidated assets, and we have pledged the stock of our subsidiaries to secure the debt under our credit facility. If an event of default under our credit agreement occurs, our lenders could declare all amounts outstanding, including accrued interest, immediately due and payable. If we could not repay those amounts, those lenders could proceed against the collateral pledged to them to secure that indebtedness. If our credit facility indebtedness were accelerated, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full that indebtedness. Our ability to comply with the covenants in our credit agreement will depend upon our future performance and various other factors, such as business, competitive, technological, legislative and regulatory factors, some of which are beyond our control. If we fail to comply with the covenants in our credit agreement, our lenders could declare all amounts owed to them immediately due and payable.

Risks Related to Our Class A Common Stock

The public market for our Class A Common Stock may be volatile.

      We cannot assure you that the market price of our Class A Common Stock will not decline, and the market price could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to such factors as:

•  conditions and trends in the radio broadcasting industry;

•  actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results, including audience share ratings and financial results;

•  changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;

•  technological innovations;

•  competitive developments;

•  adoption of new accounting standards affecting companies in general or affecting companies in the radio broadcasting industry in particular; and

•  general market conditions and other factors.

      Further, the stock markets, and in particular the NASDAQ National Market, on which our Class A Common Stock is listed, from time to time have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that were not necessarily related or proportionate to the operating performance of the affected companies. In

30

addition, general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions, interest rate movements or international currency fluctuations, may adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock.

Certain stockholders control or have the ability to exert significant influence over the voting power of our capital stock.

      As of February 28, 2006, and after giving effect to the exercise of all of their options exercisable within 60 days of that date, Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., our Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director, and his brother, John W. Dickey, our Executive Vice President, collectively beneficially own 6,607,505 shares, or approximately 12.5%, of our outstanding Class A Common Stock, and 2,145,561 shares, or 100.0%, of our outstanding Class C Common Stock, which collectively represent approximately 37.7% of the outstanding voting power of our common stock. Consequently, they have the ability to exert significant influence over our policies and management. The interests of these stockholders may differ from the interests of our other stockholders.

      As of February 28, 2006, BA Capital Company, L.P., referred to as BA Capital, and its affiliate, BancAmerica Capital Investors SBIC I, L.P., referred to as BACI, together own 840,250 shares, or 1.7%, of our Class A Common Stock and 11,630,759 shares, or 100.0%, of our nonvoting Class B Common Stock, which is convertible into shares of Class A Common Stock. BA Capital also holds options exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2006 to purchase 105,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock and Robert H. Sheridan, III, one of our directors and a senior vice president and managing director with an economic interest in the general partners of both BA Capital and BACI, holds options exercisable within 60 days of February 18, 2006 to purchase 102,499 shares of our Class A Common Stock. Assuming that those options were exercised for shares of our Class A Common Stock, and giving effect to the conversion into shares of our Class A Common Stock of all shares of our Class B Common Stock held by BA Capital and BACI, BA Capital and BACI would hold approximately 20.7% of the total voting power of our common stock. BA Capital and BACI are both affiliates of Bank of America Corporation. BA Capital has the right to designate one member of our Board and Mr. Sheridan currently serves on our Board as BA Capital’s designee. As a result, BA Capital, BACI and Mr. Sheridan have the ability to exert significant influence over our policies and management, and their interests may differ from the interests of our other stockholders.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

      In various places in this annual report on Form 10-K, we use statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Although we believe that, in making any of these statements, our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, these statements may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from these projected. When used in this document, words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those referred above to under “Risk Factors” and as otherwise described in our periodic filings with the SEC from time to time.

      Important facts that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, certain of which are beyond our control, include:

•  the impact of general economic conditions in the United States or in specific markets in which we currently do business;

•  industry conditions, including existing competition and future competitive technologies;

•  the popularity of radio as a broadcasting and advertising medium;

•  cancellations, disruptions or postponements of advertising schedules in response to national or world events;

31

•  our capital expenditure requirements;

•  legislative or regulatory requirements;

•  risks and uncertainties relating to our leverage;

•  interest rates;

•  our continued ability to identify suitable acquisition targets;

•  consummation and integration of pending or future acquisitions;

•  access to capital markets; and

•  fluctuations in exchange rates and currency values.

      Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will occur or, if any of them do occur, what impact they will have on us. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments, except as required under federal securities laws. We caution you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

      Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties

      The types of properties required to support each of our radio stations include offices, studios, transmitter sites and antenna sites. A station’s studios are generally housed with its offices in business districts of the station’s community of license or largest nearby community. The transmitter sites and antenna sites are generally located so as to provide maximum market coverage.

      At December 31, 2005, we owned studio facilities in 43 of our 59 markets and we owned transmitter and antenna sites in 57 of our 59 markets. We lease additional studio and office facilities in 44 markets and additional transmitter and antenna sites in 54 markets. In addition, we lease corporate office space in Atlanta, Georgia. We do not anticipate any difficulties in renewing any facility leases or in leasing alternative or additional space, if required. We own or lease substantially all of our other equipment, consisting principally of transmitting antennae, transmitters, studio equipment and general office equipment.

      No single property is material to our operations. We believe that our properties are generally in good condition and suitable for our operations; however, we continually look for opportunities to upgrade our properties and intend to upgrade studios, office space and transmission facilities in certain markets.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

      We from time to time are involved in various legal proceedings that are handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. While we are unable to predict the outcome of these matters, our management does not believe, based upon currently available facts, that the ultimate resolution of any of such proceedings would have a material adverse effect on our overall financial condition or results of operations.

      We have been subpoenaed by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, as were other radio broadcasting companies, in connection with the New York Attorney General’s investigation of promotional practices related to record companies’ dealings with radio stations broadcasting in New York. We are cooperating with the Attorney General in this investigation.

32

Item 4. Submission of Matters To a Vote of Security Holders

      During the fourth quarter, October 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, there were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information For Common Stock

      Shares of our Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share have been quoted on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol CMLS since the consummation of the initial public offering of our Class A Common Stock on July 1, 1998. There is no established public trading market for our Class B Common Stock or our Class C Common Stock. The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low closing sales prices of the Class A Common Stock on the NASDAQ National Market, as reported in published financial sources.

Year		High		Low
2004
	First Quarter	$	22.70	$	19.37
	Second Quarter	$	22.28	$	16.02
	Third Quarter	$	16.59	$	13.37
	Fourth Quarter	$	16.36	$	13.58
2005
	First Quarter	$	15.00	$	13.63
	Second Quarter	$	14.55	$	11.50
	Third Quarter	$	13.05	$	11.66
	Fourth Quarter	$	13.11	$	10.85
2006
	First Quarter (through February 28, 2006)	$	13.51	$	11.48

Holders

      As of February 28, 2006, there were approximately 1,363 holders of record of our Class A Common Stock, 2 holders of record of our Class B Common Stock and 1 holder of record of our Class C Common Stock. The figure for our Class A Common Stock does not include an estimate of the number of beneficial holders whose shares may be held of record by brokerage firms or clearing agencies.

Dividends

      We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not currently anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings for use in our business. We are currently subject to restrictions under the terms of the credit agreement governing our credit facility that limit the amount of cash dividends that we may pay on our Class A Common Stock. We may pay cash dividends on our Class A Common Stock in the future only if we meet certain financial tests set forth in the credit agreement.

33

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Incentive Plans

      The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2005, the number of securities outstanding under our equity compensation plans, the weighted average exercise price of such securities and the number of securities available for grant under these plans:

					Number of Shares
	Number of Shares to				Remaining Available for
	be Issued Upon		Weighted-Average		Future Issuance Under
	Exercise of Outstanding		Exercise Price of		Equity Compensation
	Options, Warrants and		Outstanding Options,		Plans (Excluding
Plan Category	Rights		Warrants and Rights		Column (a))
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders		8,350,529	$	14.21		1,646,817
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders		1,722,691	$	15.29		249,558
Total		10,073,220				1,896,375

      The only existing equity compensation plan not approved by our stockholders is the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. Our Board adopted the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan on March 1, 2002, and stockholder approval of that plan was not required. For a description of all equity compensation plans, please refer to Note 11 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Share Repurchase Plan

      On September 28, 2004, our Board authorized the purchase, from time to time, of up to $100.0 million of our Class A Common Stock, subject to the terms of our credit agreement. Subsequently, on December 7, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of a second $100.0 million of our Class A Common Stock. Under these programs, we have cumulatively repurchased the following shares, which are being held in treasury:

		Total Number
		of Shares		Average Price
Period		Purchased		Per Share
2004			1,004,429	$	14.56
2005			7,766,223	$	12.31
2006 (through February 28, 2006)			2,011,500	$	12.77
	Total		10,782,152	$	12.61

      During the three months ended December 31, 2005 and consistent with the Board-approved repurchase plan, we repurchased 2,661,725 shares of our Class A Common Stock in the open market at an average price per share of $12.15. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had authority to repurchase an additional $89.6 million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, although the current terms of our credit agreement would limit us to $39.6 million in additional purchases.

								Maximum
								Dollar Value of
								Shares That
						Total Number of		May Yet Be
		Total Number				Shares Purchased as		Purchased
		of Shares		Average Price		Part of Publicly		Under The
Period		Purchased		Per Share		Announced Program		Program
October 1, 2005 – October 31, 2005			—		—		6,108,927	$	22,013,238
November 1, 2005 – November 30, 2005(1)			1,196,200	$	11.67		7,305,127	$	8,027,518
December 1, 2005 – December 31, 2005(2)			1,465,525	$	12.54		8,770,652	$	89,621,041
	Total		2,661,725				8,770,652

34

(1)	Shares were repurchased under the Board-approved purchase plan announced on September 28, 2004, which authorized the purchase of up to $100.0 million of our Class A Common Stock.
(2)	Shares were repurchased under the Board-approved purchase plans announced on September 28, 2004 and December 7, 2005, each of which authorized the purchase of up to $100.0 million ($200.0 million total) of our Class A Common Stock.

Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data

      The selected consolidated historical financial data presented below has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001. Our consolidated historical financial data are not comparable from year to year because of our acquisition and disposition of various radio stations during the periods covered. This data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, as set forth in Part II, Item 8 and with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” set forth in Part II, Item 7 herein (dollars in thousands, except per share data).

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003			2002			2001
Net revenues	$	327,756		$	320,132		$	281,971		$	252,597		$	202,087
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees		225,963			202,441			179,536			159,766			142,357
Depreciation and amortization		21,223			21,168			19,445			16,865			50,585
LMA fees		981			3,002			1,591			1,368			2,815
Corporate general and administrative expenses		16,068			15,635			13,374			13,710			15,180
Restructuring and impairment charges (credits)		(215	)		(108	)		(334	)		(971	)		6,781
Non cash stock compensation expense		3,121			(375	)		490			171			—
Impairment charge		264,099			—			—			—			—
Operating income (loss)		(203,484	)		78,369			67,869			61,688			(15,631	)
Net interest expense		(22,487	)		(19,197	)		(21,983	)		(29,226	)		(28,716	)
Losses on early extinguishment of debt		(1,192	)		(2,557	)		(15,243	)		(9,115	)		—
Other income (expense), net		(239	)		(699	)		(924	)		1,957			10,300
Income tax (expense) benefit		14,035			(25,547	)		(24,678	)		(76,357	)		3,494
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(213,367	)		30,369			5,041			(51,053	)		(30,553	)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax		—			—			—			(41,700	)		—

35

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004			2003			2002			2001
Net income (loss)		(213,367	)		30,369			5,041			(92,753	)		(30,553	)
Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends, accretion of discount and redemption premium		—			—			1,908			27,314			17,743
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(213,367	)	$	30,369		$	3,133		$	(120,067	)	$	(48,296	)
Basic income (loss) per common share:
Income (loss) per common share before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	(3.19	)	$	0.44		$	0.05		$	(1.44	)	$	(1.37	)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		—			—			—			(0.76	)		—
Basic income (loss) per common share	$	(3.19	)	$	0.44		$	0.05		$	(2.20	)	$	(1.37	)
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
Income (loss) per common share before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	(3.19	)	$	0.43		$	0.05		$	(1.44	)	$	(1.37	)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		—			—			—			(0.76	)		—
Diluted income (loss) per common share	$	(3.19	)	$	0.43		$	0.05		$	(2.20	)	$	(1.37	)
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
Station Operating Income(1)	$	115,364		$	117,691		$	102,435		$	92,831		$	59,730
Net cash provided by operating activities		78,396			75,013			45,877			42,463			11,440
Net cash used in investing activities		(92,763	)		(28,757	)		(146,669	)		(138,734	)		(48,164	)
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities		(12,472	)		(21,016	)		47,132			151,343			31,053
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets	$	1,406,366		$	1,616,397		$	1,477,630		$	1,355,514		$	965,317
Long-term debt (including current portion)		569,000			482,102			487,344			420,262			320,018
Preferred stock subject to mandatory redemption		—			—			—			14,168			134,489
Total stockholders’ equity		586,010			884,964			792,934			729,471			432,516

(1)  See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a quantitative reconciliation of Station Operating Income to its most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

      The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis is intended to provide the reader with an overall understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, sources and uses of cash, contractual obligations and financial position. This section also includes general information about our business and a discussion of our management’s analysis of certain trends, risks and opportunities in our industry. We also provide a discussion of accounting policies that require critical

36

judgments and estimates as well as a description of certain risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results. You should read the following information in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes to our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as the information set forth in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Overview of 2005

      The advertising environment for 2005 was generally weaker then in 2004. The RAB has reported that radio revenue growth for 2005 was essentially flat compared to the prior year, with locally derived revenues growing approximately 1%, offset by a 2% decrease in national revenues. Nevertheless, for 2005, our revenue performance outpaced the industry with total pro forma net revenues increasing 1.0% (see the explanation of how we calculated our pro forma results and a reconciliation of pro forma results to our historical results under “Results of Operations” in this section).

      Our local revenue stream has remained consistently strong, with 2005 pro forma local net revenue growing 4.3%. We attribute this strength to our previous investments in our local sales forces and the strong ratings and revenue share positions we enjoy in most of our markets.

      The consistent success on the local revenue side of our business, however, was offset for 2005 by weakness in national revenue. For 2005, our pro forma net national revenues were down 18.6% versus the prior year. Political revenues realized in connection with the 2004 election year contributed approximately one-third of the decrease for 2005. Also during 2005, The Home Depot, which was a significant national advertiser in 2004, realigned its marketing efforts away from national radio advertising. The loss of this account significantly impacted our national revenues, along with national revenues across the industry.

      In May 2005, we switched national sales representation firms to Katz Media Group. Since the switch, we have already seen improvements in our national revenue stream, attributable to the systems and resources employed by Katz. We believe that as our relationship with Katz continues, we will be able to achieve greater improvement in our national revenue stream.

      Our management team remains focused on our strategy of pursuing growth through acquisition. However, acquisitions are closely evaluated to ensure that they will generate stockholder value and our management is committed to completing only those acquisitions that we believe will increase our share price. The compression of publicly traded radio broadcast company multiples in 2005, combined with a market for privately held radio stations that did not see a corresponding multiples compression, translated to minimal acquisition activity for us in 2005.

      Absent suitable acquisition opportunities, our Board authorized us to purchase shares of our Class A Common Stock. During 2004 and 2005, we completed our first $100 million of share repurchases, pursuant to a Board-authorized, $100 million share purchase program. In December 2005, our Board authorized a second $100 million share purchase program, which we intend to implement prudently, within the limits set forth under our credit agreement and over a time frame that will mitigate any factors that would otherwise increase our leverage levels.

      During 2005, we secured a new, $800 million credit facility that increased our borrowing capacity, lowered our effective interest rates and increased our overall flexibility with respect to potential acquisitions or share repurchases. As of December 31, 2005, our average cost of debt, including the effects of our derivative positions, was 4.34%. We remain committed to maintaining manageable debt levels, which will continue to improve our ability to generate cash flow from operations.

Our Business

      We own and operate FM and AM radio station clusters serving mid-sized markets throughout the United States. Through our investment in CMP, we will also operate radio station clusters serving large-sized markets throughout the United States. We are the second largest radio broadcasting company in the United States based on the number of stations owned or operated. According to Arbitron’s Market Report

37

and data published by Miller Kaplan, we have assembled market-leading groups or clusters of radio stations that rank first or second in terms of revenue share or audience share in substantially all of our markets. As of December 31, 2005, we owned and operated 307 radio stations in 61 mid-sized U.S. media markets and, together with three private equity firms, had formed CMP to acquire 33 radio stations in 8 markets, including San Francisco, Dallas, Houston and Atlanta. In addition, we own and operate a multi-market network of five radio stations in the English-speaking Caribbean. Under our LMAs, we currently provide sales and marketing services for two radio stations in two U.S. markets in exchange for a management or consulting fee, pending FCC approval of our acquisitions of these stations. We will own and operate, directly and through our investment in CMP, a total of 345 stations in 67 U.S. markets upon FCC approval and consummation of all of our pending acquisitions. The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations includes the results of these acquisitions and local marketing, management and consulting agreements.

Advertising Revenue and Station Operating Income

      Our primary source of revenues is the sale of advertising time on our radio stations. Our sales of advertising time are primarily affected by the demand for advertising time from local, regional and national advertisers and the advertising rates charged by our radio stations. Advertising demand and rates are based primarily on a station’s ability to attract audiences in the demographic groups targeted by its advertisers, as measured principally by Arbitron on a periodic basis, generally two or four times per year. Because audience ratings in local markets are crucial to a station’s financial success, we endeavor to develop strong listener loyalty. We believe that the diversification of formats on our stations helps to insulate them from the effects of changes in the musical tastes of the public with respect to any particular format.

      The number of advertisements that can be broadcast without jeopardizing listening levels and the resulting ratings is limited in part by the format of a particular station. Our stations strive to maximize revenue by managing their on-air inventory of advertising time and adjusting prices based upon local market conditions. In the broadcasting industry, radio stations sometimes utilize trade or barter agreements that exchange advertising time for goods or services such as travel or lodging, instead of for cash. Our use of trade agreements resulted in immaterial operating income/(expense) during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 of $(0.1) million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively. We continually seek to minimize our use of trade agreements.

      Our advertising contracts are generally short-term. We generate most of our revenue from local and regional advertising, which is sold primarily by a station’s sales staff. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 approximately 89%, 87% and 85%, respectively, of our revenues were from local advertising.

      Our revenues vary throughout the year. As is typical in the radio broadcasting industry, we expect our first calendar quarter will produce the lowest revenues for the year, and the second and fourth calendar quarters will generally produce the highest revenues for the year, with the exception of certain of our stations, such as those in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, where the stations generally earn higher revenues in the second and third quarters of the year because of the higher seasonal population in those communities. Our operating results in any period may be affected by the incurrence of advertising and promotion expenses that typically do not have an effect on revenue generation until future periods, if at all.

      Our most significant station operating expenses are employee salaries and commissions, programming expenses, advertising and promotional expenditures, technical expenses, and general and administrative expenses. We strive to control these expenses by working closely with local market management. The performance of radio station groups, such as ours, is customarily measured by the ability to generate Station Operating Income. See the quantitative reconciliation of Station Operating Income to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, that follows in this section.

38

Results of Operations

      Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following analysis of selected data from our consolidated statements of operations should be referred to while reading the results of operations discussion that follows:

		Year Ended December 31,									Percent Change
		2005			2004			2003			2005 vs. 2004			2004 vs. 2003
Net revenues		$	327,756		$	320,132		$	281,971			2.4	%		13.5	%
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees			225,963			202,441			179,536			11.6	%		12.8	%
Depreciation and amortization			21,223			21,168			19,445			0.3	%		8.9	%
LMA fees			981			3,002			1,591			(67.3	)%		88.7	%
Corporate general and administrative expenses			16,068			15,635			13,374			2.8	%		16.9	%
Restructuring charges (credits)			(215	)		(108	)		(334	)		99.1	%		**
Non cash stock compensation expense			3,121			(375	)		490			**			**
Impairment charge			264,099			—			—			**			**
Operating income (loss)			(203,484	)		78,369			67,869			(359.6	)%		15.5	%
Net interest expense			(22,487	)		(19,197	)		(21,983	)		17.1	%		(12.7	)%
Losses on early extinguishment of debt			(1,192	)		(2,557	)		(15,243	)		(53.4	)%		(83.2	)%
Other income (expense), net			(239	)		(699	)		(924	)		(65.8	)%		(24.4	)%
	Total nonoperating expense, net		(23,918	)		(22,453	)		(38,150	)		6.5	%		(41.1	)%
Income tax benefit (expense)			14,035			(25,547	)		(24,678	)		(154.9	)%		3.5	%
Net income (loss)			(213,367	)		30,369			5,041			**			502.4	%
Preferred stock dividends and redemption premium			—			—			1,908			**			(100.0	)%
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders		$	(213,367	)	$	30,369		$	3,133			**			869.3	%

**  Calculation is not meaningful.

      Our management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 have been presented on a historical basis. Additionally, for net revenue, operating expenses, and Station Operating Income, we have included our management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations on a pro forma basis.

Year Ended December 31, 2005 versus Year Ended December 31, 2004

      Net Revenues. Net revenues increased $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, or 2.4%, to $327.8 million, as compared with the year ended December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to revenues associated with station acquisitions completed in March 2004 in the Rochester, Minnesota and Sioux Falls, South Dakota markets.

      In addition, on a same station basis, net revenues for the 275 stations in 56 markets operated for at least a full year increased $3.7 million or 1.2% to $301.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to net revenues of $297.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in same station net revenue versus the prior year was primarily attributable to a 4.2% increase in same station local revenues partially offset by a 15.9% decrease in same station national revenues. The local revenue increase

39

for 2005 was driven by an increased revenue share captured in the same station group markets and is reflective of the maturity of these assets.

      Station Operating Expenses, excluding Depreciation, Amortization and LMA Fees. Station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees increased $23.5 million, or 11.6%, to $226.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $202.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2005 the Company recorded a non-cash contract termination cost charge totaling $13.6 million related to the second quarter termination of the Company’s national sales representation contract with Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. This non cash charge, coupled with increased expenses associated with the station acquisitions completed in March 2004, are the primary drivers of the increase for the year ended December 31, 2005. The provision for doubtful accounts was $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared with $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of net revenues, the provision for doubtful accounts was 1% for the year ended December 31, 2005, which was consistent with the prior year.

      In addition, on a same station basis, for the 275 stations in 56 markets operated for at least a full year, station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees increased $7.2 million, or 3.8%, to $195.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $188.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in same station operating expenses excluding non-cash contract termination costs, depreciation, amortization and LMA fees is primarily attributable to (1) increased programming and selling expenses associated with operating our station platform (approximately $3.0 million of increase) and (2) expenses incurred in our Houston, Texas market associated with the launch of our new news/talk station in the second quarter, coupled with promotional expenses incurred associated with the first quarter launch of our rock station in Houston (approximately $2.6 million of increase).

      Corporate, General and Administrative Expenses. Corporate, general and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million, or 2.8%, to $16.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $15.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to increased legal professional fees and other administrative costs incurred in 2005.

      Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $0.1 million, or 0.3%, to $21.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $21.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.

      LMA Fees. LMA fees totaled $1.0 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Significant components of the current year expense include $0.2 million associated with our first quarter operation of stations under an LMA agreement in Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri and $0.5 million of fees related to sales services we provided to one station in Nashville under the terms of a JSA. Significant components of the LMA fees incurred in the prior year include $2.0 million associated with our operation of the stations in Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri and $0.5 million associated with the Nashville station.

      Impairment Charge. SFAS No. 142 requires us to review the recorded values of our FCC broadcast licenses and goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. We completed our annual evaluation during the fourth quarter of 2005 and recorded an impairment charge of $264.1 million in order to reduce the carrying value of certain broadcast licenses and goodwill to their respective fair market values.

      The fair market values of our broadcast licenses and reporting units were determined primarily by using a discounted cash flows approach. We also utilized a market comparable approach, which included evaluating comparable business sales in the industry, in order to validate our results. Several factors and variables contributed to the decrease in the fair market value of certain of our intangible assets, including a reduction in management’s projected future cash flows and long-term revenue growth rates utilized in its discounted cash flows approach and overall compression in acquisition multiples associated with comparable sales in the industry.

40

      Other Expense (Income). Interest expense, net of interest income, increased by $3.3 million, or 17.1%, to $22.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $19.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The following summary details the components of our interest expense, net of interest income (dollars in thousands):

		Year Ended
		December 31,
								Increase/
		2005			2004			(Decrease)
Bank Borrowings — term loan and revolving credit facilities		$	26,728		$	17,349		$	9,379
Bank borrowings yield adjustment — interest rate swap			(3,880	)		1,753			(5,633	)
Change in the fair value of interest rate option agreement			(31	)		(403	)		372
Other interest expense			771			1,171			(400	)
Interest income			(1,101	)		(673	)		(428	)
	Interest expense, net	$	22,487		$	19,197		$	3,290

      The increase to interest expense was primarily due to a higher average cost of bank debt and increased levels of bank debt outstanding during the current year.

      Losses on Early Extinguishment of Debt. Losses on early extinguishments of debt totaled $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared with $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Losses in the current year relate to the retirement of our prior credit facility in connection with securing a new $800 million credit facility in July 2005. Losses in the prior year relate to (1) the completion of an amendment and restatement of our then-current credit agreement in January 2004 and the related retirement and replacement of our then-existing eight year term loan facility ($0.5 million), and (2) the completion of an amendment and restatement of our then-current credit agreement in July 2004 and the related retirement and replacement of our then-existing term loans ($2.1 million).

      Income Tax Expense. We recorded an income tax benefit of $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared with income tax expense of $25.5 million in the prior period. For the current year, we realized an income tax benefit of $47.4 million related to reversal of certain deferred tax liabilities associated with intangible assets as a result of the impairment charge recorded and described above. This income tax benefit was offset primarily by deferred tax expense recorded to establish valuation allowances against net operating loss carry-forwards generated during the period. Income tax expense in the prior year was comprised entirely of deferred tax expense associated with the establishment of valuation allowances against net operating loss carry-forwards generated during the period.

      Station Operating Income. As a result of the factors described above, Station Operating Income decreased $2.3 million, or 2.0%, to $115.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $117.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.

41

      The following table reconciles Station Operating Income to Operating income (loss) as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations (the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP) (dollars in thousands):

		Year Ended December 31,
		2005			2004
Operating income (loss)		$	(203,484	)	$	78,369
	Non cash stock compensation		3,121			(375	)
	Restructuring charges (credits)		(215	)		(108	)
	LMA fees		981			3,002
	Depreciation and amortization		21,223			21,168
	Corporate general and administrative		16,068			15,635
	Non cash contract termination costs		13,571			—
	Impairment charge		264,099			—
Station Operating Income		$	115,364		$	117,691

      Intangible Assets. Intangible assets, net of amortization, were $1.2 billion and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These intangible asset balances primarily consist of broadcast licenses and goodwill, although we possess certain other intangible assets obtained in connection with our acquisitions, such as non-compete agreements. Intangible assets, net, decreased from the prior year due to an impairment charge and related reduction in their carrying value recorded in connection with our annual impairment evaluation of intangible assets. This decrease was offset by a $47.8 million increase in intangible assets acquired in acquisitions. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of tangible assets and specifically identified intangible assets.

Pro Forma — Year Ended December 31, 2005 versus Year Ended December 31, 2004

      The pro forma results for 2005 compared to 2004 presented below assume that the 310 radio stations in 61 markets that we owned or operated for any portion of 2005 were acquired effective January 1, 2005. The pro forma analysis presented below excludes the performance of our non-radio subsidiary Broadcast Software International, Inc., referred to as BSI. BSI is our sole non-radio broadcasting subsidiary and engages primarily in the sale of a software product utilized solely by the radio broadcasting industry. The entity’s results were excluded primarily due to their relative immateriality and in order to provide our stockholders with standalone, comparable results of our core business: radio broadcasting. For the year ended December 31, 2005, BSI accounted for approximately 0.6% of our consolidated net revenue. (see also the table below for a reconciliation of GAAP results to pro forma results for these periods) (dollars in thousands).

	Year Ended December 31,
	2005		2004
Net revenues	$	325,907	$	322,828
Station operating expenses excluding non-cash contract termination costs, depreciation and amortization and LMA fees		210,738		204,704
Station Operating Income	$	115,169	$	118,124

42

Reconciliation Between Historical GAAP Results and Pro Forma Results

	Year Ended December 31, 2005							Year Ended December 31, 2004
	Historical					Pro Forma		Historical					Pro Forma
	GAAP		Adjustments			Results		GAAP		Adjustments			Results
Net revenue	$	327,756	$	(1,849	)(1)	$	325,907	$	320,132	$	2,696	(3)	$	322,828
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization and LMA fees		225,963		(15,225	)(2)		210,738		202,441		2,263	(4)		204,704
Station Operating Income(5)	$	115,364	$	(195	)	$	115,169	$	117,691	$	433		$	118,124

(1)	Reflects the elimination of revenues from BSI.
(2)	Reflects the elimination of operating expenses from BSI of $1,654 and elimination of non-cash contract termination costs of $13,571.
(3)	Reflects the addition of revenues from Rochester, Minnesota, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Blacksburg, Virginia, Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri, all of which we commenced operating under the terms of a local marketing agreement or acquired during 2004 ($4.5 million), offset by the elimination of revenues from BSI ($1.8 million).
(4)	Reflects the addition of expenses from Rochester, Minnesota, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Blacksburg, Virginia and Columbia-Jefferson City, Missouri, all of which we commenced operating under the terms of a local marketing agreement or acquired during 2004 ($3.7 million), offset by the elimination of operating expenses from BSI ($1.4 million).
(5)	See the preceding quantitative reconciliation of Station Operating Income to operating income, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

      Pro forma net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 1.0% to $325.9 million from $322.8 million in the prior year. Pro forma station operating expenses excluding non-cash contract termination costs, depreciation, amortization and LMA fees for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased 2.9% to $210.7 million from $204.7 million in the prior year.

Year Ended December 31, 2004 versus Year Ended December 31, 2003

      Net Revenues. Net revenues increased $38.2 million, or 13.5%, to $320.1 million, as compared with the prior year. This increase was primarily attributable to revenues associated with (1) station acquisitions and stations newly operated under LMAs (approximately $23.6 million of the increase) and (2) organic revenue growth.

      In addition, on a same station basis, net revenue for the 260 stations in 53 markets operated for at least a full year increased $12.7 million or 4.9% to $275.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to net revenues of $262.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in same station net revenue versus the prior year was primarily attributable to a 6.1% increase in same station local revenues partially offset by a 1.5% decrease in same station national revenues. The local revenue increase for 2004 was driven by an increased revenue share captured in the same station group markets and is reflective of the maturity of these assets.

      Station Operating Expenses, excluding Depreciation, Amortization and LMA Fees. Station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees increased $22.9 million, or 12.8%, to $202.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from $179.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to expenses associated with station acquisitions and stations operated under LMAs. The provision for doubtful accounts was $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared with $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of net revenues, the provision for doubtful accounts was 1% for the year ended December 31, 2004, which was consistent with the prior year.

43

      In addition, on a same station basis, for the 260 stations in 53 markets operated for at least a full year, station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees increased $3.4 million, or 2.1%, to $171.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $167.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in same station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees is primarily attributable to increased variable sales costs associated with revenue growth.

      Corporate, General and Administrative Expenses. Corporate, general and administrative expenses increased $2.3 million, or 16.9%, to $15.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $13.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to (i) increased professional fees and other administrative costs incurred in connection with our efforts to comply with the requirements mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (approximately $0.8 million of increase), (ii) increased corporate employee costs (approximately $0.5 million of increase) and (iii) increased state franchise tax expense associated with our expanding platform (approximately $0.4 million of increase).

      Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $1.7 million, or 8.9%, to $21.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to the acquisition of stations and related increases in depreciation expense associated with acquired assets.

      LMA Fees. LMA fees total $3.0 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Significant components of the current year expense include $2.0 million associated with our operation of stations under an LMA agreement in Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri and $0.5 million of fees related to sales services provided by the Company to one station in Nashville under the terms of a JSA. LMA fees incurred in the prior year include $0.3 million associated with our operation of stations under an LMA agreement in Appleton, Wisconsin, $0.5 million associated with our operation of stations under an LMA in Nashville and $0.2 million of fees related to sales services we provided to one station in Nashville under the terms of a JSA.

      Other Expense (Income). Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net of interest income, decreased by $2.8 million, or 12.7%, to $19.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $22.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The following summary details the components of our interest expense, net of interest income (dollars in thousands):

		Year Ended
		December 31,
								Increase/
		2004			2003			(Decrease)
Bank Borrowings — term loan and revolving credit facilities		$	17,349		$	16,619		$	730
103/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008			—			3,764			(3,764	)
Bank borrowings yield adjustment — interest rate swap			1,753			1,988			(235	)
Change in the fair value of interest rate option agreement			(403	)		(553	)		150
Other interest expense			1,171			767			404
Interest income			(673	)		(602	)		71
	Interest expense, net	$	19,197		$	21,983		$	(2,786	)

      In an effort to reduce our overall leverage and simplify our capital structure, at various times between December 2002 and July 2003, we repurchased or redeemed all of our outstanding 10³/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the “Notes”). The elimination of this debt instrument reduced our interest expense by $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. This decrease in interest expense was partially offset by increased expense of $0.7 million compared to the prior year associated with additional borrowings made under our credit facilities during 2004.

      Losses on Early Extinguishment of Debt. Losses on early extinguishments of debt totaled $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared with $15.2 million for the year ended

44

December 31, 2003. Losses in 2004 relate to (1) the completion of an amendment and restatement of our then-current credit agreement in January 2004 and the related retirement and replacement of our then-current eight year term loan facility ($0.5 million), and (2) the completion of an amendment and restatement of our then-current credit agreement in July 2004 and the related retirement and replacement of our then-existing term loans ($2.1 million). Losses in the prior year relate to the repurchase or redemption of $132.6 million of the notes and the retirement of our then-existing $175.0 million eight-year term loan facility in connection with refinancing activities also completed in April 2003. With regard to the redemptions of the notes, we paid $6.0 million in redemption premiums, $0.2 million in professional fees and wrote off $3.0 million of debt issuance costs. With regard to the extinguishment of our then-existing $175.0 million eight-year term loan, we paid $1.5 million in professional fees and wrote-off $1.4 million of previously capitalized debt issue costs.

      Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense totaled $25.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Tax expense in the current and prior year is comprised entirely of deferred tax expense and relates primarily to the establishment of valuation allowances against net operating loss carry-forwards generated during the periods.

      Preferred Stock Dividends and Premium on Redemption of Preferred Stock. Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends, accretion of discount and premium on redemption of preferred stock decreased $1.9 million to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums during 2003 are comprised of a $0.60 million redemption premium paid in connection with the repurchase of 4,900 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock in the first quarter of 2003, a $0.6 million redemption premium paid in connection with the redemption of 9,268 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock in July 2003, plus accrued dividends through July 7, 2003 of $0.7 million. As of July 7, 2003, we had redeemed all outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock.

      Station Operating Income. As a result of the factors described above, Station Operating Income increased $15.3 million, or 14.9%, to $117.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $102.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.

      The following table reconciles Station Operating Income to Operating income (loss) as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations (the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP) (dollars in thousands):

		Year Ended December 31,
		2004			2003
Operating income (loss)		$	78,369		$	67,869
	Non cash stock compensation		(375	)		490
	Restructuring charges (credits)		(108	)		(334	)
	LMA fees		3,002			1,591
	Depreciation and amortization		21,168			19,445
	Corporate general and administrative		15,635			13,374
Station Operating Income		$	117,691		$	102,435

      Intangible Assets. Intangible assets, net of amortization, were $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These intangible asset balances primarily consist of broadcast licenses and goodwill, although we possess certain other intangible assets obtained in connection with our acquisitions, such as non-compete agreements. The increase in intangible assets, net during the year ended December 31, 2004 is attributable to acquisitions during the year. Specifically identified intangible assets, including broadcasting licenses, are recorded at their estimated fair values on the date of the related acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of tangible assets and specifically identified intangible assets. Although intangible assets are recorded in our financial statements at amortized cost, we believe that such assets, especially broadcast licenses, can significantly appreciate in

45

value by successfully executing our operating strategies. During 2002, 2001, and 2000, we recognized gains from the sale of stations.

Pro Forma — Year Ended December 31, 2004 versus Year Ended December 31, 2003

      The pro forma results for 2004 compared to 2003 presented below assume that the 303 radio stations in 61 markets that we owned or operated for any portion of 2004 were acquired effective January 1, 2003. The pro forma analysis presented below excludes the performance of BSI. BSI is our sole non-radio broadcasting subsidiary and engages primarily in the sale of a software product utilized solely by the radio broadcasting industry. The entity’s results were excluded primarily due to their relative immateriality and in order to provide our stockholders with standalone, comparable results of our core business: radio broadcasting. For the year ended December 31, 2004, BSI accounted for approximately 0.5% of our consolidated net revenue and approximately 0.4% of our consolidated operating income. (see also the table below for a reconciliation of GAAP results to pro forma results for these periods) (dollars in thousands).

	Year Ended December 31,
	2004		2003
Net revenues	$	322,828	$	309,850
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization and LMA fees		204,704		203,280
Station Operating Income	$	118,124	$	106,570

Reconciliation Between Historical GAAP Results and Pro Forma Results

	Year Ended December 31, 2004							Year Ended December 31, 2003
	Historical					Pro Forma		Historical					Pro Forma
	GAAP		Adjustments			Results		GAAP		Adjustments			Results
Net revenue	$	320,132	$	2,696	(1)	$	322,828	$	281,971	$	27,879	(3)	$	309,850
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization and LMA fees		202,441		2,263	(2)		204,704		179,536		23,744	(4)		203,280
Station Operating Income(5)	$	117,691	$	433		$	118,124	$	102,435	$	4,135		$	106,570

(1)	Reflects the addition of revenues from Rochester, Minnesota, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Blacksburg, Virginia, Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri, all of which we commenced operation of under the terms of a local marketing agreement or acquired during 2004 ($4.5 million), offset by the elimination of revenues from BSI ($1.8 million).
(2)	Reflects the addition of expenses from Rochester, Minnesota, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Blacksburg, Virginia and Columbia-Jefferson City, Missouri, all of which we commenced operation of under the terms of a local marketing agreement or acquired during 2004 ($3.7 million), offset by the elimination of operating expenses from BSI ($1.4 million).
(3)	Reflects the addition of revenues related to acquisitions completed in 2003 ($5.9 million), station acquisitions completed in 2004, including Rochester, Minnesota, Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Blacksburg, Virginia ($15.9 million) and stations operated under LMA agreements during 2004 including Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri ($7.9 million). The increase is offset by the elimination of revenues from BSI ($1.8 million).
(4)	Reflects the addition of expenses related to acquisitions completed in 2003 ($6.5 million), station acquisitions completed in 2004, including Rochester, Minnesota, Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Blacksburg, Virginia ($11.9 million) and stations operated under LMA agreements during 2004 including Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri ($6.9 million). The increase is offset by the elimination of expenses from BSI ($1.6 million).

46

(5)  See the preceding quantitative reconciliation of Station Operating Income to operating income, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.

      Pro forma net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased 4.2% to $322.8 million from $309.9 million in the prior year. Pro forma station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased 0.7% to $204.7 million from $203.3 million in the prior year.

Seasonality

      We expect that our operations and revenues will be seasonal in nature, with generally lower revenue generated in the first quarter of the year and generally higher revenue generated in the second and fourth quarters of the year. The seasonality of our business reflects the adult orientation of our formats and relationship between advertising purchases on these formats with the retail cycle. This seasonality causes and will likely continue to cause a variation in our quarterly operating results. Such variations could have an effect on the timing of our cash flows.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Our principal need for funds has been to fund the acquisition of radio stations, expenses associated with our station and corporate operations, capital expenditures, repurchases of our outstanding Notes and Series A Preferred Stock, repurchases of our Class A Common Stock, and interest and debt service payments. The following table summarizes our historical funding needs for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

	2005		2004		2003
Acquisitions and purchase of intangible assets	$	84,096	$	12,201	$	133,558
Capital expenditures		9,315		12,123		9,629
Notes repurchases		—		—		141,710
Preferred stock repurchases		—		—		15,417
Repurchases of common stock		95,739		14,640		—
Repayments of bank borrowings		560,102		91,741		248,656
Interest payments		22,684		20,137		28,508

      In the short term, our principal future need for funds will include the funding of station operating expenses, corporate general and administrative expenses, LMA fees and interest and debt service payments. In addition, in the long term, our funding needs will include our pending acquisitions ($5.6 million as of December 31, 2005) and capital expenditures associated with maintaining our station and corporate operations and implementing HD Radio^tm technology. We expect maintenance capital expenditures to be approximately $4.0 million for 2005.

      In December 2004, we purchased 240 perpetual licenses from iBiquity, which will enable us to convert to and utilize iBiquity’s HD Radio^tmtechnology on 240 of our stations. Under the terms of the agreement with iBiquity, we will convert certain of our stations over a seven-year period. We anticipate that the average cost to convert each station will be between $75,000 and $100,000. During 2005, we converted 10 stations for approximately $1.0 million. For 2006, we plan to convert an additional 20 stations.

      Our principal sources of funds for these requirements have been cash flow from operations and cash flow from financing activities, such as the proceeds from offerings of our securities and borrowings under credit facilities. We believe that our presently projected cash flow from operations and present financing arrangements, including availability under our existing credit facilities, or borrowings that would be available from future financing arrangements, will be sufficient to meet our future capital needs, including the funding of pending acquisitions, operations and debt service for the next twelve months. However, our cash flow from operations is subject to such factors as shifts in population, station listenership,

47

demographics or audience tastes, and borrowings under financing arrangements are subject to financial covenants that can restrict our financial flexibility. Further, our ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing is also subject to market conditions and operating performance. As such, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such financing at terms, and on the timetable, that may be necessary to meet our future capital needs. See Item I.A. “Risk Factors.”

Cash Flows from Operating Activities.

	2005		2004		2003
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	78,396	$	75,013	$	45,877

      Net cash provided by operating activities increased by approximately 4.5% for the year ended December 31, 2005. Excluding non-cash items, we generated comparable levels of operating income for 2005 as compared with the prior year. As a result, the marginal increase in cash flows from operations was primarily attributable to the timing of certain payments.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities.

	2005		2004		2003
Net cash used in investing activities	$	92,763	$	28,757	$	146,669

      For the year ended December 31, 2005, net cash used in investing activities increased $64.0 million, to $92.8 million, from $28.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. For fiscal 2005, we invested approximately $84.1 million in station acquisitions and the purchase of certain broadcast licenses in its Houston, Texas market. For 2004, we funded approximately $71.3 million of our $93.7 million of acquisitions with shares of our Class A Common Stock, which contributed to an overall decrease in cash outlays as compared with 2005 and years prior to 2004.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities.

	2005			2004			2003
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	$	(12,472	)	$	(21,016	)	$	47,132

      Net cash used in financing activities was primarily the result of $95.7 million paid to repurchase 7,766,223 shares of our Class A Common Stock, offset by net borrowings under our credit facilities of $86.9 utilized to fund acquisitions and the share repurchases. Net cash used in financing activities in the prior year was primarily the result of (1) the repayment of a $10.0 million note originally issued in connection with the acquisition of stations in Kansas City, Missouri in 2003 and (2) $14.6 million paid to repurchase 1,004,429 shares of our Class A Common Stock. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2003 was primarily the result of net borrowings under our credit facilities ($189.8 million), offset by cash paid to repurchase 14,168 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock ($15.4 million) and cash paid to repurchase $132.6 million in aggregate principal of the Notes ($141.7 million).

      Historical Acquisitions and Dispositions. We completed three acquisitions of ten radio stations in four markets and the acquisition of a studio facility during the year ended December 31, 2005. Of the $47.8 million required to fund these acquisitions, $47.4 million was funded in cash and $0.4 million represented capitalizable external acquisition costs.

      On March 4, 2005, we completed the acquisition of KFRU-AM, KBXR-FM, KOQL-FM and KPLA-FM serving Columbia, Missouri and KLIK-AM, KBBM-FM and KJMO-FM serving Jefferson City, Missouri from Premier Radio Group. In connection with the acquisition, we paid $38.7 million in cash and incurred $0.1 million in capitalizable acquisition costs. The Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri stations were acquired primarily because they complemented our station portfolio and increased both our state and regional coverage.

48

      On March 31, 2005, we purchased the broadcast license for KVST-FM, licensed to LaPorte, Texas and serving Houston, Texas, for $34.8 million. Of the $34.8 million required to purchase the broadcast license, $31.1 million was funded in cash, $1.0 million had been previously funded in the form of a cash escrow deposit and $2.7 million was paid in capitalizable acquisition costs. During the second quarter of 2005, we completed the construction of a broadcast tower and transmitter site for this station and commenced broadcasting and operation. The addition of KVST-FM represents our second FM station in the Houston market.

      In August 2005, we completed the disposition of one station in the Blacksburg, Virginia market for approximately $1.8 million in cash. Of the total consideration, we received $1.7 million at closing and $0.1 million was held in escrow and will be released upon resolution of post closing matters. In connection with the transaction, we recorded a $0.4 million gain on sale of assets.

      Pending Acquisitions. As of December 31, 2005, we were a party to various agreements to acquire three stations across two markets. The aggregate purchase price of those pending acquisitions is expected to be approximately $5.6 million in cash. As of December 31, 2005, we were also a party to two asset exchange agreements, under which we have agreed to transfer two of our stations in the Ft. Walton Beach, Florida market plus $3.0 million in cash in exchange for two different stations in the market. As of December 31, 2005, we have put $2.3 million in escrow funds toward these asset exchange transactions.

      Periodically, the FCC makes FM frequencies available for acquisition through an auction process. On November 3, 2004, the FCC held an auction for approximately 290 frequencies. As of the close of the auction, we were the winning bidder for seven frequencies and were obligated to pay the FCC $8.6 million. During 2005, the FCC granted the final authorization on and we completed the purchase of six of the seven frequencies won in the November 2004 auction. As of December 31, 2005, we had funded $7.6 million of our total obligation. We expect to complete the purchase of the remaining frequency from the November 2004 auction during the first half of 2006.

      On January 12, 2006, the FCC held a similar auction for approximately 171 frequencies, located mostly in remote areas of the country, in which we actively participated. As of the close of the auction, we were the winning bidder for one frequency and were obligated to pay the FCC $1.6 million. As of December 31, 2005, we had funded $0.7 toward our obligation to the FCC in the form of an escrow deposit, to be applied by the FCC to the bid price upon grant of the final authorization for the frequency. This authorization will enable us to add a station to one of our existing markets once constructed.

      We expect to consummate our remaining pending acquisitions during 2006, although there can be no assurance that the transactions will be consummated within that time frame, or at all. In addition, from time to time we complete acquisitions following the initial grant of an assignment application by the FCC staff, but before such grant becomes a final order, and a petition to review such a grant may be filed in the interim. There can be no assurance that such grants may not ultimately be reversed by the FCC or an appellate court as a result of such petitions, which could result in a requirement that we divest the assets we have acquired. Our ability to make future acquisitions in addition to the pending acquisitions is dependent on our ability to obtain additional equity and/or debt financing. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such financing.

      Sources of Liquidity. We have historically financed our acquisitions primarily through the proceeds from debt and equity financings, the proceeds from asset divestitures and using cash generated from operations. We financed the cash components of our 2005 acquisitions primarily with cash generated from operations.

      On July 14, 2005, we entered into a new $800 million credit facility, which provides for a seven-year $400.0 million revolving credit facility and a seven-year $400.0 million term loan facility. We used the proceeds of the term loan facility, fully funded on July 14, 2005, and drawings on that date of $123.0 million on the revolving credit facility, primarily to repay all amounts owed under our prior credit facility. Through December 31, 2005, we drew down $60.0 million under our revolving facility and made

49

payments of $14.0 million. As of December 31, 2005, $169.0 million was outstanding under the seven-year revolving credit facility and $400.0 million was outstanding under the seven-year term loan facility.

      Our obligations under the credit facility are collateralized by substantially all of our assets in which a security interest may lawfully be granted (including FCC licenses held by our subsidiaries), including, without limitation, intellectual property, real property, and all of the capital stock of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (except the capital stock of BSI) and 65% of the capital stock of any first-tier foreign subsidiary. The obligations under the credit facility are also guaranteed by each of the direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, except BSI, and are required to be guaranteed by any additional subsidiaries that we acquire.

      The term-loan facility will mature on July 14, 2012 and will amortize in equal quarterly installments beginning on March 31, 2007, in quarterly amounts as follows: for each quarter in 2007 and 2008, 1.25%; for each quarter in 2009 and 2010, 3.75%; and, for each quarter beginning on March 31, 2011 and through July 14, 2012, 10.0%. The revolving credit facility will also mature on July 14, 2012 and the commitment will remain unchanged up to that date.

      Both the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal to the Alternate Base Rate (as defined under the terms of our credit agreement; 7.25% as of December 31, 2005) plus a margin ranging between 0.0% to 0.25%, or the Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined under the terms of the credit agreement; 4.38% as of December 31, 2005) plus a margin ranging between 0.675% to 1.25% (in each case dependent upon our leverage ratio). At December 31, 2005 our effective interest rate, excluding the interest rate swap agreement discussed below, on loan amounts outstanding under the credit facility was 5.63%.

      In March 2003, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixed the interest rate, based on LIBOR, on $300.0 million of floating rate bank borrowings for a three-year period. As a result, and including the fixed component of the swap, at December 31, 2005, our effective interest rate on loan amounts outstanding under the credit facility was 4.34%.

      In May 2005, we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that will become effective in March 2006, following the termination of our current swap agreement. When effective, this swap agreement will effectively fix the interest rate, based on LIBOR, on $400.0 million of our floating rate bank borrowings through March 2009.

      A commitment fee calculated at a rate ranging from 0.25% to 0.375% per year (depending upon our leverage levels) of the average daily amount available under the revolving credit facility is payable quarterly in arrears, and fees in respect of letters of credit, issued in accordance with the credit agreement governing our credit facility, equal to the interest rate margin then applicable to Eurodollar Rate loans under the revolving credit facility, are payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, a “fronting fee” of 0.25% is payable quarterly to the issuing bank.

      We are required to make certain mandatory prepayments of the term loan facility and there will be automatic reductions in the availability of the revolving credit facility under certain circumstances, including the incurrence of certain indebtedness and upon consummation of certain asset sales. In these instances, we are required to apply 100% of the net proceeds to the outstanding balance on the credit facility.

      Under the terms of the credit agreement, we are subject to certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including, but not limited to maximum leverage covenants, minimum interest coverage covenants, limitations on capital expenditures, asset dispositions and the payment of dividends. The failure to comply with the covenants would result in an event of default, which in turn would permit acceleration of debt under the credit agreement. At December 31, 2005, we were in compliance with these financial and operating covenants.

      The terms of the credit agreement contain events of default after expiration of applicable grace periods, including failure to make payments on the credit facility, breach of covenants, breach of

50

representations and warranties, invalidity of the credit agreement and related documents, cross default under other agreements or conditions relating to our indebtedness or that of our restricted subsidiaries, certain events of liquidation, moratorium, insolvency, bankruptcy or similar events, enforcement of security, certain litigation or other proceedings, and certain events relating to changes in control. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the terms of the credit agreement, the majority of the lenders are able to declare all amounts under the credit facility to be due and payable and take certain other actions, including enforcement of rights in respect of the collateral. The majority of the banks extending credit under each term loan facility and the majority of the banks under each revolving credit facility may terminate the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility, respectively, upon an event of default.

      We originally issued $160.0 million in aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes in 1998. During the first quarter of 2003, we completed the repurchase of $30.1 million in aggregate principal of the notes for which we paid a premium of $2.4 million. In April 2003, we completed a tender offer and consent solicitation relating to the outstanding notes. In the tender offer, we repurchased and canceled $88.8 million in principal amount of the notes, leaving $13.7 million of the notes outstanding. We paid $6.0 million in redemption premiums related to the notes tendered. Pursuant to the consent solicitation, substantially all of the restrictive covenants in the indenture governing the notes were eliminated. As permitted by the terms of the indenture, we called for and completed the redemption of all of the remaining outstanding notes on July 3, 2003. The notes were redeemed at a redemption price of 105.188% of the principal amount ($0.7 million in redemption premium), plus accrued interest through July 2, 2003.

      We issued $125.0 million of our Series A Preferred Stock in connection with our initial public offering on July 1, 1998. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive cumulative dividends at an annual rate equal to 13³/4% of the liquidation preference per share of Series A Preferred Stock, payable quarterly, in arrears. On or before July 1, 2003, we could have, at our option, paid dividends in cash or in additional fully paid and non-assessable shares of Series A Preferred Stock. From July 1, 1998 until March 31, 2002, we issued an additional $41.9 million of shares of Series A Preferred Stock as dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock. Prior to the redemption of all of the outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock on July 7, 2003, as discussed below, all of the dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock were paid in shares, except for (1) $3.5 million of cash dividends paid in fiscal 2000 (2) $11.8 million of cash dividends paid in fiscal 2002 and (3) $1.1 million of cash dividends paid in fiscal 2003.

      During 2002 and the first quarter of 2003, we negotiated and completed the repurchase of 125,221 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock for $140.8 million in cash. A redemption premium of $0.6 million associated with the repurchases of 4,900 shares during the three months ended March 31, 2003 has been included as a component of preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. On July 7, 2003 we completed the redemption of all outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. The 9,268 shares outstanding were redeemed at a redemption price of 106.875% ($0.6 million in redemption premiums) plus accrued dividends through July 6, 2003, all in accordance with the terms and conditions of the stock designations governing the Series A Preferred Stock.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, our management, in consultation with the Audit Committee of our Board, evaluates these estimates, including those related to bad debts, intangible assets, income taxes, restructuring and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or

51

conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

      We recognize revenue from the sale of commercial broadcast time to advertisers when the commercials are broadcast, subject to meeting certain conditions such as persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists and collection is reasonably assured. These criteria are generally met at the time an advertisement is broadcast.

      We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We determine the allowance based on historical write-off experience and trends. We review our allowance for doubtful accounts monthly. Past due balances over 120 days are reviewed individually for collectibility. All other balances are reviewed and evaluated on a pooled basis. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. Although our management believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses, if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

      We have significant intangible assets recorded in our accounts. These intangible assets are comprised primarily of broadcast licenses and goodwill acquired through the acquisition of radio stations. SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and other Intangible Assets, requires that the carrying value of our goodwill and certain intangible assets be reviewed at least annually for impairment and charged to results of operations in the periods in which the recorded value of those assets is more than their fair market value. For 2004 and 2003, we reviewed the fair market values of our broadcast licenses and goodwill and determined that their fair value exceeded their carrying amount and, as such, did not record an impairment charge. During 2005, we recorded impairment charges of approximately $264.1 million in order to reduce the carrying value of certain broadcast licenses and goodwill to their respective fair market values. As of December 31, 2005, we have $1.2 billion in intangible assets and goodwill, which represent approximately 87% of our total assets.

      The fair market value of our broadcast licenses and reporting units, for purposes of our annual impairment tests, was derived primarily by using a discounted cash flows approach. The fair market values derived include assumptions that contain a variety of variables. These variables are based on industry data, historical experience and estimates of future performance and include, but are not limited to, revenue and expense growth rates for each radio market, revenue and expense growth rates for our stations in each market, overall discount rates based on our weighted average cost of capital and acquisition multiples. The assumptions used in estimating the fair market value of goodwill are based on currently available data and our management’s best estimates and, accordingly, a change in market conditions or other factors could have a significant effect on the estimated value. A significant future decrease in the fair market value of broadcast licenses or goodwill in a market could result in additional impairment charges.

      In connection with the elimination of amortization of broadcast licenses upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the reversal of our deferred tax liabilities relating to those intangible assets is no longer assured within our net operating loss carry-forward period. As a result, we have recorded deferred tax expense of $27.4 million, $25.5 million and $23.1 million to establish a valuation allowance against net operating loss carry-forwards generated during the year ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, resulting from amortization of goodwill and broadcast licenses that is deductible for tax purposes, but is no longer amortized in the financial statements. Should we determine that we would be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, reduction of the valuation allowance would be recorded in income in the period such determination was made.

Summary Disclosures About Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

      On October 31, 2005 we announced that, together with affiliates of three private equity firms, we formed CMP, which has entered into agreements to acquire the radio broadcasting business of Susquehanna. The acquisition is expected to close in the first half of 2006 and is subject to regulatory

52

approvals, as well as other closing conditions. Pursuant to a capital contribution agreement, we will contribute our Kansas City, Missouri and Houston, Texas radio operations and assets to CMP, in exchange for an equity stake initially valued at approximately 25% of the equity of CMP.

      The following tables reflect a summary of our contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):

Payments Due By Period

			Less Than		1 to 3		4 to 5		After 5
Contractual Cash Obligations:	Total		1 Year		Years		Years		Years
Long-term debt(1)(2)	$	569,000	$	—	$	40,000	$	120,000	$	409,000
Acquisition obligations(3)		4,653		4,653		—		—		—
FCC auctions(4)		917		917		—		—		—
Operating leases		53,124		8,178		14,050		8,861		22,035
Digital radio capital obligations(5)		23,000		2,000		6,000		7,000		8,000
Other operating contracts(6)		29,614		9,037		19,324		1,253		—
Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	680,308	$	24,785	$	79,374	$	137,114	$	439,035

(1)	Under our credit agreement, the maturity of our outstanding debt could be accelerated if we do not maintain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants.
(2)	Based on long-term debt amounts outstanding at December 31, 2005, scheduled annual principal amortization and the current effective interest rate on such long-term debt amounts outstanding, we would be obligated to pay approximately $171.5 million of interest on borrowings through July 2012 ($31.6 million due in less than 1 year, $61.2 million due in years 2 and 3, $52.9 million due in years 4 and 5 and $25.7 million due after 5 years).
(3)	Amount is reflective of the unfunded obligation under agreements to purchase radio stations.
(4)	Amount is reflective of the unfunded obligation relative to seven FM frequencies we won in an auction sponsored the FCC in November 2004.
(5)	Amount represents the estimated capital requirements to convert 230 of our stations to a digital broadcasting format in future periods.
(6)	Consists of contractual obligations for goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding obligations which include all significant terms. In addition, amounts include $3.3 million of station acquisition purchase price which was deferred beyond the closing of the transaction and which is being paid monthly over a 5 year period.

Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period

(In thousands)

	Total Amounts		Less Than		1 to 3		4 to 5		After 5
Other Commercial Commitments:	Committed		1 Year		Years		Years		Years
Letter of Credit(1)	$	105	$	105	$	—	$	—	$	—

(1)  In connection with certain acquisitions, we are obligated to provide an escrow deposit in the form of a letter of credit during the period prior to closing.

53

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

      We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2005.

Accounting Pronouncements

      On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. The amendments made by SFAS No. 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have “commercial substance.” SFAS No. 153 was effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 on its effective date did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

      On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123: (Revised 2004) — Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123R”). SFAS No. 123R replaces SFAS No. 123, which the Company adopted on January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 123R requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements and measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. SFAS No. 123R is effective as of the first annual reporting period beginning after December 31, 2005. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 123R on a modified prospective method, effective January 1, 2006. As permitted by SFAS No. 123(R), the Company currently accounts for share-based payments to employees using APB No. 25’s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)’s fair value method will have a significant impact on our results of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall financial position. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow, as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption.

      In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections — A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and SFAS No. 3. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle by requiring that a voluntary change in accounting principle be applied retrospectively with all prior periods’ financial statements presented on the new accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in depreciation or amortization for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle and corrections of errors in previously issued financial statements should be termed a “restatement”. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

      On March 30, 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, which clarifies when an entity must record a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. The types of asset retirement obligations that are covered by this Interpretation are those for which an entity has a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity; however, the timing and/or method of settling the obligation are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47, which also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation, was effective for the year ended December 31, 2005. Our adoption of FIN 47 did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

54

Intangibles

      As of December 31, 2005, approximately 87% of our total assets consisted of intangible assets, such as radio broadcast licenses and goodwill, the value of which depends significantly upon the operational results of our business. We could not operate the radio stations without the related FCC license for each station. FCC licenses are renewed every eight years; consequently, we continually monitor the activities of our stations to ensure they comply with all regulatory requirements.

      Historically, all of our licenses have been renewed at the end of their respective eight-year periods, and we expect that all licenses will continue to be renewed in the future.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

      At December 31, 2005, 100% of our long-term debt bears interest at variable rates. Accordingly, our earnings and after-tax cash flow are affected by changes in interest rates. Assuming the current level of borrowings at variable rates and assuming a one percentage point change in the 2005 average interest rate under these borrowings, it is estimated that our 2005 interest expense and net income would have changed by $5.7 million. As part of our efforts to mitigate interest rate risk, in March 2003, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixed the interest rate, based on LIBOR, on $300.0 million of our current floating rate bank borrowings for a three-year period. This agreement is intended to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations and was not entered into for speculative purposes. Segregating the $269.0 million of borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2005 which are not subject to the interest rate swap and assuming a one percentage point change in the 2005 average interest rate under these borrowings, it is estimated that our 2005 interest expense and net income would have changed by $2.7 million.

      In the event of an adverse change in interest rates, our management would likely take actions, in addition to the interest rate swap agreement discussed above, to mitigate our exposure. However, due to the uncertainty of the actions that would be taken and their possible effects, additional analysis is not possible at this time. Further, such analysis would not consider the effects of the change in the level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment.

Foreign Currency Risk

      As a result of the 1997 acquisition of Caribbean Communications Company Ltd., (“CCC”), we have operations in five countries throughout the English-speaking Caribbean. All foreign operations are measured in their local currencies. As a result, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in the foreign markets in which we have operations.

      We maintain no derivative instruments to mitigate the exposure to translation and/or transaction risk. However, this does not preclude the adoption of specific hedging strategies in the future. Our foreign operations generated net income of approximately $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

      It is estimated that a 5% change in the value of the U.S. dollar to the Eastern Caribbean dollar or the Trinidad and Tobago dollar would change net income for the year ended December 31, 2005 by an amount less than $0.1 million.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

      The information in response to this item is included in our consolidated financial statements, together with the report thereon of KPMG LLP, beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which follows the signature page hereto.

55

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

      Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

      We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Such disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. At the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting.

      Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for us. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our CEO and CFO, and affected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that control systems may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

      Our management, including our CEO and CFO, has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, our management, including our CEO and CFO, has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005.

      Our independent auditor, KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, and this attestation report follows immediately below.

Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.	Martin R. Gausvik
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer	Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
and Director	Chief Financial Officer

56

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Cumulus Media Inc.:

      We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Cumulus Media Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Cumulus Media Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

      In our opinion, management’s assessment that Cumulus Media Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, Cumulus Media Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Cumulus Media Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and our report dated March 16, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

March 16, 2006

57

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

      In October 2005, as previously disclosed, we reconsidered our accounting for the termination of a particular contract during the second quarter of 2005. On November 7, 2005, the audit committee of our Board determined that the interim financial statements included in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 should be restated. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2, An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements, provides that a restatement of previously issued financial statements is a strong indicator of the existence of a “material weakness” in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting. Based upon that standard, management concluded that the control deficiency that resulted in the incorrect accounting of the non-cash contract termination charge represented a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. Subsequent to that determination, prior to year-end we implemented certain remedial measures to address this material weakness. The remedial measures include adoption of a formal procedure whereby contracts, agreements and leases are independently reviewed by key members of our management for identification of any complex accounting issues and adoption of a process to validate the preliminary conclusions reached by our accounting staff regarding the proper treatment of these issues. The remedial measures were tested prior to year-end and determined to be working effectively, and enabled our management to conclude that the material weakness identified in October 2005 has been remediated.

      Except as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.     Other Information

      None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

      The information required by this item with respect to our directors, compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and our code of ethics is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Members of the Board of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Information about the Board of Directors” and “Code of Ethics” in our definitive proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, expected to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end. The required information regarding our executive officers is contained in Part I of this report.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

      The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Executive Compensation” in our definitive proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, expected to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners & Management and Related Stockholder Matters

      The information required by this item with respect to the security ownership of our management and certain beneficial owners is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our definitive proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, expected to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end. The required information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our executive compensation plans is contained in Part II of this report.

58

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

      The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in our definitive proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, expected to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

      The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Auditor Fees and Services” in our definitive proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, expected to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

      (a)(1)-(2) Financial Statements. The financial statements and financial statement schedule listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing on page F-1 of this annual report on Form 10-K are filed as a part of this report. All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission have been omitted either because they are not required under the related instructions or because they are not applicable.

      (a)(3) Exhibits.

3	.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cumulus Media Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our current report on Form 8-K, filed on August 2, 2002).
3	.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cumulus Media Inc., as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004).
4	.1	Form of Class A Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our current report on Form 8-K, filed on August 2, 2002).
4	.2	Voting Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and between NationsBanc Capital Corp., Cumulus Media Inc. and the stockholders named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2001).
10	.1	Form of Cumulus Media Inc. 1998 Executive Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of our registration statement on Form S-1, filed on June 25, 1998 and declared effective on June 26, 1998 (Commission File No. 333-48849)).
10	.2	Form of Cumulus Media Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of our registration statement on Form S-1, filed on June 25, 1998 and declared effective on June 26, 1998(Commission File No. 333-48849)).
10	.3	Cumulus Media Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our registration statement on Form S-8, filed on June 7, 2001(Commission File No. 333-62542)).
10	.4	Cumulus Media Inc. 1999 Executive Stock Incentive Plan(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of our registration statement on Form S-8, filed on June 7, 2001(Commission File No. 333-62542)).
10	.5	Cumulus Media Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our registration statement on Form S-8, filed on June 7, 2001(Commission File No. 333-62538)).
10	.6	Cumulus Media Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our registration statement on Form S-8, filed on April 15, 2003(Commission File No. 333-104542)).
10	.7	Cumulus Media 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our registration statement on Form S-8, filed on August 9, 2004(Commission File No. 333-118047)).
10	.8	Restricted Stock Award, dated April 25, 2005, between the Company and Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of our current report on Form 8-K, filed on April 29, 2005).

59

10	.9	Form of Restricted Stock Award (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of our current report on Form 8-K, filed on April 29, 2005).
10	.10	Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Cumulus Media Inc. and Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our current report on Form 8-K, filed on October 19, 2004).
10	.11	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Cumulus Media Inc. and Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2001).
10	.12	Employment Agreement between Cumulus Media Inc. and John G. Pinch (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2001).
10	.13	Employment Agreement between Cumulus Media Inc. and Martin Gausvik (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2001).
10	.14	Employment Agreement between Cumulus Media Inc. and John W. Dickey (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2001).
10	.15	Promissory Note, dated as of February 2, 2000, made by Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., in favor of Cumulus Media Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).
10	.16	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among Cumulus Media Inc., NationsBanc Capital Corp., Heller Equity Capital Corporation, The State of Wisconsin Investment Board and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2001).
10	.17	Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 23, 2002, by and among Cumulus Media Inc., Aurora Communications, LLC and the other parties identified therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of our current report on Form 8-K, filed on February 7, 2002).
10	.18	Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 28, 2002, between Cumulus Media Inc. and DBBC, L.L.C. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002).
10	.19	Credit Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2005, among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of our current report on Form 8-K, filed on July 19, 2005).
10	.20	Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2005, among the Company, the Subsidiaries of the Company identified therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of our current report on Form 8-K, filed on July 19, 2005).
21	.1	Subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21.1 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004).
23	.1*	Consent of KPMG LLP.
31	.1*	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31	.2*	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32	.1*	Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*  Filed herewith

(b)	Exhibits. See Item 15(a)(3).
(c)	Financial Statement Schedules. Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

60

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 16th day of March 2006.

Cumulus Media Inc.

By  /s/ Martin R. Gausvik

Martin R. Gausvik

Executive Vice President, Treasurer

and Chief Financial Officer

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.	Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, (Principal Executive Officer)	March 16, 2006
/s/ Martin R. Gausvik Martin R. Gausvik	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	March 16, 2006
/s/ Ralph B. Everett Ralph B. Everett	Director	March 16, 2006
/s/ Holcombe T. Green, Jr. Holcombe T. Green, Jr.	Director	March 16, 2006
/s/ Eric P. Robison Eric P. Robison	Director	March 16, 2006
/s/ Robert H. Sheridan, III Robert H. Sheridan, III	Director	March 16, 2006

61

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      The following Consolidated Financial Statements of Cumulus Media Inc. are included in Item 8:

	Page in This
	Report
(1)  Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2005 and 2004		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003		F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7
(2)  Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		S-1

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Cumulus Media Inc.:

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cumulus Media Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cumulus Media Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Cumulus Media Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 16, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

March 16, 2006

F-2

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2005 and 2004

(Dollars in thousands, except for share and per share data)

			2005			2004
Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	5,121		$	31,960
	Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,404 and $2,650 respectively			54,258			54,834
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			11,705			8,366
	Deferred income taxes			154			416
		Total current assets		71,238			95,576
Property and equipment, net				87,588			93,206
Intangible assets, net				1,041,340			1,132,736
Goodwill				185,517			276,060
Other assets				20,683			18,819
		Total assets	$	1,406,366		$	1,616,397
Current liabilities:
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	29,561		$	19,078
	Current portion of long-term debt			—			40,957
		Total current liabilities		29,561			60,035
Long-term debt				569,000			441,145
Other liabilities				17,925			4,642
Deferred income taxes				203,870			225,611
		Total liabilities		820,356			731,433
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 20,262,000 shares authorized, par value $0.01 per share, including: 250,000 shares designated as 133/4% Series A Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock due 2009, stated value $1,000 per share, and 12,000 shares designated as 12% Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock, stated value $10,000 per share; 0 shares issued or outstanding				—			—
Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 58,307,248 and 57,677,996 shares issued; 49,536,596 and 56,673,567 shares outstanding respectively				583			577
Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 11,630,759 shares issued and outstanding				116			116
Class C common stock, par value $.01 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 644,871 shares issued and outstanding				6			6
	Treasury stock, at cost, 8,770,652 and 1,004,429 shares, respectively			(110,379	)		(14,640	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income				7,401			2,867
Additional paid-in-capital				1,016,687			1,011,075
Accumulated deficit				(323,412	)		(110,045	)
Loan to officer				(4,992	)		(4,992	)
Total stockholders’ equity				586,010			884,964
		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,406,366		$	1,616,397

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

(Dollars in thousands, except for share and per share data)

				2005			2004			2003
Net revenues				$	327,756		$	320,132		$	281,971
Operating expenses:
	Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees (including non-cash contract termination costs of $13,571, $0 and $0, respectively)				225,963			202,441			179,536
	Depreciation and amortization				21,223			21,168			19,445
	LMA fees				981			3,002			1,591
	Corporate general and administrative (excluding non cash stock compensation expense of $3,121, $(375) and $490, respectively)				16,068			15,635			13,374
	Restructuring charges (credits)				(215	)		(108	)		(334	)
	Non cash stock compensation expense				3,121			(375	)		490
	Impairment charge				264,099			—			—
		Total operating expenses			531,240			241,763			214,102
		Operating income (loss)			(203,484	)		78,369			67,869
Nonoperating income (expense):
	Interest expense				(23,588	)		(19,870	)		(22,585	)
	Interest income				1,101			673			602
	Losses on early extinguishment of debt				(1,192	)		(2,557	)		(15,243	)
	Other income (expense), net				(239	)		(699	)		(924	)
		Total nonoperating expense, net			(23,918	)		(22,453	)		(38,150	)
		Income (loss) before income taxes			(227,402	)		55,916			29,719
Income tax benefit (expense)					14,035			(25,547	)		(24,678	)
			Net income (loss)		(213,367	)		30,369			5,041
Preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums					—			—			1,908
			Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(213,367	)	$	30,369		$	3,133
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
Basic income (loss) per common share				$	(3.19	)	$	0.44		$	0.05
Diluted income (loss) per common share				$	(3.19	)	$	0.43		$	0.05
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding					66,910,721			68,789,035			64,305,693
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding					66,910,721			71,308,102			66,950,422

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

(Dollars in thousands, except for share data)

	Class A				Class B						Class C
	Common Stock				Common Stock						Common Stock							Accumulated
																		Other		Additional									Total
	Number of		Par		Number of			Par			Number		Par		Treasury			Comprehensive		Paid-In			Accumulated			Loans to			Stockholders’
	Shares		Value		Shares			Value			of Shares		Value		Stock			Income		Capital			Deficit			Officers			Equity
Balance at January 1, 2003 (Note 12)		48,843,191	$	488		13,244,954		$	132			644,871	$	6	$	—		$	—	$	884,284		$	(145,455	)	$	(9,984	)	$	729,471
Net income		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		—			5,041			—			5,041
Other comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of derivative instrument				—					—			—		—		—			401		—			—			—			401
Total comprehensive income				—					—			—		—		—			401		—			5,041			—			5,442
Issuance of common stock		538,460		6		—			—			—		—		—			—		7,230			—			—			7,236
Proceeds from warrant exercises		16,814		—		706,424			7			—		—		—			—		8,672			—			—			8,679
Non cash stock compensation expense		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		490			—			—			490
Preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		(1,908	)		—			—			(1,908	)
Share exchange		2,320,619		23		(2,320,619	)		(23	)		—		—		—			—		—			—			—			—
Issuance of common stock in acquisitions		2,097,418		21		—			—			—		—		—			—		38,511			—			—			38,532
Collection on loan to officer		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		—			—			4,992			4,992
Balance at December 31, 2003		53,816,502	$	538		11,630,759		$	116			644,871	$	6	$	—		$	401	$	937,279		$	(140,414	)	$	(4,992	)	$	792,934
Net income		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		—			30,369			—			30,369
Other comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of derivative instrument		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			2,466		—			—			—			2,466
Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			2,466		—			30,369			—			32,835
Issuance of common stock		292,359		3		—			—			—		—		—			—		2,863			—			—			2,866
Non cash stock compensation expense		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		(375	)		—			—			(375	)
Treasury stock buybacks				—		—			—			—		—		(14,640	)		—		—			—			—			(14,640	)
Issuance of common stock in acquisitions		3,569,135		36		—			—			—		—		—			—		71,308			—			—			71,344
Balance at December 31, 2004		57,677,996	$	577		11,630,759		$	116			644,871	$	6	$	(14,640	)	$	2,867	$	1,011,075		$	(110,045	)	$	(4,992	)	$	884,964
Net loss		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		—			(213,367	)		—			(213,367	)
Other comprehensive income:
Change in fair value of derivative instrument		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			4,534		—			—			—			4,534
Total comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			4,534		—			(213,367	)		—			(208,833	)
Issuance of common stock		629,252		6		—			—			—		—		—			—		2,491			—			—			2,497
Non cash stock compensation expense		—		—		—			—			—		—		—			—		3,121			—			—			3,121
Treasury stock buybacks		—		—		—			—			—		—		(95,739	)		—		—			—			—			(95,739	)
Balance at December 31, 2005		58,307,248	$	583		11,630,759		$	116			644,871	$	6	$	(110,379	)	$	7,401	$	1,016,687		$	(323,412	)	$	(4,992	)	$	586,010

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

(Dollars in thousands)

			2005			2004			2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)			$	(213,367	)	$	30,369		$	5,041
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
	Write-off of debt issuance costs			1,192			2,557			4,383
	Redemption premiums for repurchase of 103/8% Senior Subordinated Notes			—			—			9,128
	Depreciation			20,554			20,327			18,512
	Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets			669			841			933
	Amortization of debt issuance costs			420			215			402
	Provision for doubtful accounts			3,753			3,694			3,441
	Change in the fair value of derivative instruments			357			(403	)		(553	)
	Loss (gain) on sale of assets or stations			(895	)		—			118
	Non-cash contract termination charge			13,571			—			—
	Impairment charge			264,099			—			—
	Deferred income taxes			(19,946	)		25,547			24,678
	Non-cash stock compensation			3,121			(375	)		490
	Adjustment of restructuring charges			(215	)		(108	)		(334	)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions/dispositions:
	Restricted cash			—			—			13,000
	Accounts receivable			(3,179	)		(5,102	)		(7,006	)
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			1,431			1,536			(3,675	)
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses			8,775			(1,236	)		(18,109	)
	Other assets			(2,156	)		(273	)		(2,472	)
	Other liabilities			212			(2,576	)		(2,100	)
		Net cash provided by operating activities		78,396			75,013			45,877
Cash flows from investing activities:
	Acquisitions			(47,389	)		(11,001	)		(133,558	)
	Dispositions			3,747			—			715
	Purchase of intangible assets			(36,707	)		(1,200	)		—
	Escrow deposits on pending acquisitions			(3,038	)		(3,820	)		(61	)
	Capital expenditures			(9,315	)		(12,123	)		(9,629	)
	Other			(61	)		(613	)		(4,136	)
		Net cash used in investing activities		(92,763	)		(28,757	)		(146,669	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds from bank credit facility			647,000			96,499			438,500
	Repayments of borrowings from bank credit facility			(560,102	)		(91,741	)		(248,656	)
	Payments for repurchase of 103/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, including redemption premiums			—			—			(141,710	)
	Payments for debt issuance costs			(4,379	)		(2,301	)		—
	Payments on promissory notes			—			(10,000	)		(180	)
	Payment of dividend on Series A Preferred Stock			—			—			(1,146	)
	Payments for repurchases of common stock			(95,739	)		(14,640	)		—
	Payments for redemption of preferred stock			—			—			(15,417	)
	Proceeds from collection of officer loan			—			—			4,992
	Proceeds from issuance of common stock			748			1,167			10,749
		Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(12,472	)		(21,016	)		47,132
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents				(26,839	)		25,240			(53,660	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year				31,960			6,720			60,380
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year			$	5,121		$	31,960		$	6,720
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
	Interest paid		$	22,684		$	20,137		$	28,508
	Income taxes paid			—			—			—
Non cash operating, investing and financing activities:
Trade revenue			$	18,249		$	18,750		$	18,613
	Trade expense			18,354			18,317			18,296
	Assets acquired through notes payable			—			5,000			10,000
	Liabilities assumed through acquisitions			14			1,800			135
	Issuance of common stock and warrants in exchange for acquired businesses			—			71,344			38,532

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Description of Business

      Cumulus Media Inc., (“we,” “Cumulus” or the “Company”) is a radio broadcasting corporation incorporated in the state of Delaware, focused on acquiring, operating and developing commercial radio stations in mid-size radio markets in the United States.

Principles of Consolidation

      The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cumulus and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to bad debts, intangible assets, derivative financial instruments, income taxes, restructuring and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

      The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risks

      Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience and trends. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts monthly. Past due balances over 120 days are reviewed individually for collectibility. All other balances are reviewed and evaluated on a pooled basis. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

      In the opinion of management, credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to the large number of diversified customers and the geographic diversification of the Company’s customer base. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and believes that adequate allowances for any uncollectible accounts receivable are maintained.

Property and Equipment

      Property and equipment are stated at cost. Property and equipment acquired in business combinations are recorded at their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition under the purchase method of accounting. Equipment under capital leases is stated at the present value of minimum lease payments.

F-7

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Equipment held under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease. Routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation of construction in progress is not recorded until the assets are placed into service.

Asset Retirement Obligations

      The Company adopted SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations in 2003. This statement requires that the fair value of a legal liability for an asset retirement obligation be recorded in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. Upon recognition of a liability, the asset retirement cost is recorded as an increase in the carrying value of the related long-lived asset and then depreciated over the life of the asset. The Company determined that certain obligations under lease agreements for studio, transmitter sites and tower sites meet the scope requirements of SFAS No. 143 and, accordingly, determined the fair value of our obligation in accordance with the statement. The resulting obligation fair value was estimated to be insignificant and, as a result, an asset retirement obligation was not recorded by the Company.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

      The Company’s intangible assets are comprised of broadcast licenses, goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of assets of businesses acquired. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life, which includes the Company’s broadcast licenses, are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

      In determining that the Company’s broadcast licenses qualified as indefinite lived intangibles, management considered a variety of factors including the Federal Communications Commission’s historical track record of renewing broadcast licenses, the very low cost to the Company of renewing the applications (approximately $150 per license), the relative stability and predictability of the radio industry, the consistent historical revenue growth of the radio industry despite competitive factors and the relatively low level of capital investment required to maintain the physical plant of a radio station.

Debt Issuance Costs

      The costs related to the issuance of debt are capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debt. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 the Company recognized amortization expense of debt issuance costs of $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

Extinguishment of Debt

      The Company’s losses on extinguishment of debt have been reflected as a component of income (loss) from continuing operations, consistent with the provisions of issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. Losses recognized during 2005, 2004 and 2003 relate to the retirement of certain term loan borrowings under the Company’s credit facilities and the redemption of the Company’s 10³/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008.

F-8

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Derivative Financial Instruments

      The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This standard requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Fair value changes are recorded in income for any contracts not classified as qualifying hedging instruments. For derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedge instruments, the effective portion of the derivative fair value change must be recorded through other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity.

Revenue Recognition

      Revenue is derived primarily from the sale of commercial airtime to local and national advertisers. Revenue is recognized as commercials are broadcast.

Trade Agreements

      The Company trades commercial airtime for goods and services used principally for promotional, sales and other business activities. An asset and liability is recorded at the fair market value of the goods or services received, which approximates the fair value of the air time surrendered in the trade. Trade revenue is recorded and the liability is relieved when commercials are broadcast and trade expense is recorded and the asset relieved when goods or services are consumed.

Local Marketing Agreements

      In certain circumstances, the Company enters into a local marketing agreement (“LMA”) or time brokerage agreement with a Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licensee of a radio station. In a typical LMA, the licensee of the station makes available, for a fee, airtime on its station to a party, which supplies programming to be broadcast on that airtime, and collects revenues from advertising aired during such programming. Revenues earned and LMA fees incurred pursuant to local marketing agreements or time brokerage agreements are recognized at their gross amounts in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Variable Interest Entities

      The Company accounts for entities qualifying as variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (“FIN 46R”). FIN 46R addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) as defined in the Interpretation.

      The Company has determined that several entities with which it has existing contractual relationships under local marketing agreements (“LMA”) qualify as VIEs. A typical LMA is an agreement under which a Federal Communications Commission licensee of a radio station makes available, typically for a fee, air time on its station to another party. The other party provides programming to be broadcast during such airtime and collects revenues from advertising it sells for broadcast during such programming. During various periods during 2004, the Company operated 20 stations under local marketing agreements. These stations were owned and licensed to 7 separate entities qualifying as VIEs. Under these agreements, the licensee of the stations does not have the right to access the Company’s assets to pay general creditors. Further, the Company has not pledged any of its assets as collateral for obligations of the VIEs. The Company has determined that it was the primary beneficiary of each of the VIEs and, as such, these entities were consolidated into the Company’s financial statements.

      As of December 31, 2005, the Company operated 2 radio stations under local marketing agreements, which were owned and licensed to 2 entities qualifying as VIEs. For 2005 and 2004, the 12 and 20 stations

F-9

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

operated under LMAs during each year contributed $2.2 million and $10.2 million, respectively, to the consolidated net revenues of the Company.

Stock-based Compensation

      The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25, issued in March 2000, to account for its fixed plan stock awards. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price of the stock awards. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, the Company has elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above, and has adopted only the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income (loss) if the fair value-based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.

			2005			2004			2003
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders:
	Net income (loss), as reported		$	(213,367	)	$	30,369		$	5,041
	Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income (loss)			3,121			(375	)		490
	Deduct: Total stock based compensation expense determined under fair value based method			(15,100	)		(12,527	)		(12,914	)
		Pro forma net income (loss)		(225,346	)		17,467			(7,383	)
	Preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums			—			—			1,908
		Pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(225,346	)	$	17,467		$	(9,291	)
Basic income (loss) per common share:
	As reported		$	(3.19	)	$	0.44		$	0.05
	Pro forma		$	(3.37	)	$	0.25		$	(0.14	)
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
	As reported		$	(3.19	)	$	0.43		$	0.05
	Pro forma		$	(3.37	)	$	0.24		$	(0.14	)

      The per share weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 was $10.21, $12.99 and $9.95, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants:

      2005 Option Grants: expected volatility of 73.2% for 2005; risk-free interest rate of 4.76%; dividend yield of 0% and expected lives of seven years from the date of grant.

      2004 Option Grants: expected volatility of 51.2% for 2004; risk-free interest rate of 4.46%; dividend yield of 0% and expected lives of four years from the date of grant.

      2003 Option Grants: expected volatility of 38.4% for 2003; risk-free interest rate of 4.25%; dividend yield of 0% and expected lives of four years from the date of grant.

F-10

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Effective January 1, 2006, the Company expects to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which is described in the New Accounting Pronouncements section that follows. Management anticipates that when the new standard is adopted, the standard will materially impact the Company’s financial position and operations income.

Income Taxes

      Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

      In accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

      Goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested annually for impairment, and are tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value.

Comprehensive Income

      SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income. Comprehensive income includes net income as currently reported under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and also considers the effect of additional economic events that are not required to be reported in determining net income, but rather are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Company reports changes in the fair value of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges as a component of comprehensive income.

Earnings Per Share

      Basic and diluted income (loss) per share are computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of outstanding stock options and warrants using the “treasury stock” method.

F-11

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

      The carrying values of receivables, payables, and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s long term debt approximates its fair value.

Accounting for National Advertising Agency Contract

      During the second quarter of 2005, the Company was released from its pre-existing national advertising sales agency contract with Interep National Radio, Inc (“Interep”) and engaged Katz Media Group, Inc (“Katz”) as its new national advertising sales agent The contract has several economic elements which principally reduce the overall expected commission rate below the stated base rate. The Company estimates the overall expected commission rate over the entire contract period and applies that rate to commissionable revenue throughout the contract period with the goal of estimating and recording a stable commission rate over the life of the contract.

      The following are the principal economic elements of the contract that can affect the base commission rate:

•  A $13.6 million non-cash charge recorded by the Company related to the termination of our contract with our former national advertising agent.

•  Potential commission rebates from Katz should national revenue not meet certain targets for certain periods during the contract term. These amounts are measured annually with settlement to occur shortly thereafter. The rebate amounts currently deemed probable of settlement relate to year one of the contract.

•  Potential additional commissions in excess of the base rates if Katz should exceed certain revenue target. No additional commission payments have been assumed.

      The potential commission adjustments are estimated and combined in the balance sheet with the contractual termination liability. That liability is accreted to commission expense to effectuate the stable commission rate over the course of the Katz contract.

      The Company’s accounting for and calculation of commission expense to be realized over the life of the Katz contract requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect reported amounts of commission expense. Actual results may differ from management’s estimates. Over the course of the Company’s contractual relationship with Katz, management will continually update its assessment of the effective commission expense attributable to national sales in an effort to record a consistent commission rate over the term of the Katz contract.

New Accounting Pronouncements

      On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. The amendments made by SFAS No. 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have “commercial substance.” SFAS No. 153 was effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 on its effective date did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

      On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004) — Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123R”). SFAS No. 123R replaces SFAS No. 123, which the Company adopted on

F-12

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 123R requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements and measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 123R on the modified prospective method, effective January 1, 2006. As permitted by SFAS No. 123(R), the Company currently accounts for share-based payments to employees using APB No. 25’s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)’s fair value method will have a material impact on our results of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall financial position. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow.

      In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections — A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and SFAS No. 3. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle by requiring that a voluntary change in accounting principle be applied retrospectively with all prior periods’ financial statements presented on the new accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in depreciation or amortization for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle and corrections of errors in previously issued financial statements should be termed a “restatement”. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

      On March 30, 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,” that clarifies when an entity must record a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. The types of asset retirement obligations that are covered by this Interpretation are those for which an entity has a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity; however, the timing and/or method of settling the obligation are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47, which also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation, was effective for the year ended December 31, 2005. The adoption by the Company of FIN 47 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

2. Acquisitions and Dispositions

Pending Acquisitions

      As of December 31, 2005, we were a party to various agreements to acquire three stations across two markets. The aggregate purchase price of those pending acquisitions is expected to be approximately $5.6 million in cash. As of December 31, 2005, we were also a party to two asset exchange agreements, under which we have agreed to transfer two stations in Ft. Walton Beach, Florida market plus $3.0 million in cash in exchange for two different stations in the market. As of December 31, 2005, we have put $2.3 million in escrow funds toward these asset exchange transactions.

      Periodically, the FCC makes FM frequencies available for acquisition through an auction process. On November 3, 2004, the FCC held an auction for approximately 290 frequencies. As of the close of the auction, we were the winning bidder for seven frequencies and were obligated to pay the FCC $8.6 million. During 2005, the FCC granted the final authorization on and we completed the purchase of six of the seven frequencies won in the November 2004 auction. As of December 31, 2005, we had funded

F-13

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

$7.6 million of our total obligation. We expect to complete the purchase of the remaining frequency from the November 2004 auction during the first half of 2006.

      On January 12, 2006, the FCC held an auction for approximately 171 frequencies, located mostly in remote areas of the country, in which we actively participated. As of the close of the auction, we were the winning bidder for one frequency and were obligated to pay the FCC $1.6 million. As of December 31, 2005, we had funded $0.7 million toward our obligation to the FCC in the form of an escrow deposit, to be applied by the FCC to the bid price upon grant of the final authorization for the frequency. This authorization will enable us to add a station to one of our existing markets once constructed.

      Escrow funds of approximately $2.6 million paid by the Company in connection with pending acquisitions and the FCC auctions have been classified as prepaid expenses and other current assets at December 31, 2005 in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

2005 Acquisitions

      We completed three acquisitions of ten radio stations in four markets and the acquisition of a studio facility during the year ended December 31, 2005. Of the $47.8 million required to fund these acquisitions, $47.4 million was funded in cash and $0.4 million represented capitalizable external acquisition costs. These aggregate acquisition amounts include the assets acquired pursuant to the select transactions highlighted below.

      On March 4, 2005, the Company completed the asset acquisition of KFRU-AM, KBXR-FM, KOQL-FM and KPLA-FM serving Columbia, Missouri and KLIK-AM, KBBM-FM and KJMO-FM serving Jefferson City, Missouri from Premier Radio Group. In connection with the acquisition, the Company paid $38.7 million in cash and incurred $0.1 million in capitalizable external acquisition costs. The Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri stations were acquired primarily because they complemented the Company’s station portfolio and increased both its state and regional coverage of the United States.

      In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $9.0 million of goodwill, all of which is expected to be fully deductible for tax purposes.

      The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with all of the 2005 acquisitions (dollars in thousands):

Property and equipment			$	5,860
Unamortized intangible assets:
	Broadcast licenses			30,645
	Goodwill			11,294
		Total assets acquired		47,799
Current liabilities				(14	)
		Total liabilities assumed		(14	)
Net assets acquired			$	47,785

2004 Acquisitions

      We completed the acquisition of 25 radio stations and a tract of land for a tower site during the year ended December 31, 2004. Of the $93.7 million required to fund these acquisitions, $11.0 million was paid in cash, $71.3 million was paid in the form of shares of Class A Common Stock, $5.2 million was deferred beyond the closing of the transactions, $1.4 million represented capitalizable acquisition costs and

F-14

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

$4.8 million had been previously funded as escrow deposits on the pending acquisitions. These aggregate acquisition amounts include the assets acquired pursuant to the select transactions highlighted below.

Rochester, Minnesota and Sioux Falls, South Dakota

      On March 29, 2004, the Company completed the stock acquisition of Southern Minnesota Broadcasting Co. (“SMB”), which owned and operated three radio stations serving Rochester, Minnesota (KROC-AM, KROC-FM, KYBA-FM) and six radio stations serving Sioux Falls, South Dakota (KYBB-FM, KIKN-FM, KKLS-FM, KMXC-FM, KSOO-AM, KXRB-AM). In acquiring SMB, the Company issued the former owners 3,223,978 shares of Class A Common Stock and deferred $5.0 million of the purchase price beyond the closing of the transaction. Also in connection with the acquisition the Company paid $0.5 million in capitalizable acquisition costs. The Rochester, Minnesota and Sioux Falls, South Dakota stations were acquired primarily because they complemented the Company’s station portfolio and increase its presence in the midwest region of the United States.

      In connection with the SMB transaction, a deferred tax liability was recognized due to a difference between the fair market values and tax bases of the assets and liabilities acquired. The calculated fair values of the related broadcast licenses acquired in the stock acquisition were not large enough to offset the recognized deferred tax liabilities and, as a result, the Company recorded $29.0 million of goodwill. This goodwill is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

Blacksburg, Virginia

      On July 30, 2004, the Company completed the asset acquisition of WBWR-FM, WBRW-FM, WFNR-FM, WFNR-AM, WPSK-FM, WRAD-AM and WWBU-FM serving Blacksburg, Virginia from New River Valley Radio Partners, L.L.C. In connection with the acquisition, the Company paid $2.1 million in cash, deferred $0.1 million beyond the closing of the transaction and paid $0.2 million in capitalizable acquisition costs. $4.7 million of the purchase price had been previously funded in 2003 in the form of an escrow deposit. The Blacksburg, Virginia stations were acquired primarily because they complemented the Company’s station portfolio and increased both its state and regional coverage of the United States. In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $1.4 million of goodwill, all of which is expected to be fully deductible for tax purposes.

F-15

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with all of the 2004 acquisitions (dollars in thousands):

Current assets, other than cash			$	2,210
Property and equipment				10,262
Deferred tax asset				2,536
Amortized intangible assets:
	Non-compete agreements			50
Unamortized intangible assets:
	Broadcast licenses			78,125
Goodwill				30,552
		Total assets acquired		123,735
Current liabilities				(291	)
Long term liabilities				(1,509	)
Deferred tax liabilities				(28,239	)
		Total liabilities assumed		(30,039	)
Net assets acquired			$	93,696

      The non-compete agreement acquired in 2004 has a useful life of 5 years.

2003 Acquisitions

      We completed the acquisition of 25 radio stations during the year ended December 31, 2003. Of the $184.7 million required to fund these acquisitions, $133.6 million was paid in cash, $38.5 million was paid in the form of shares of Class A Common Stock (2,097,418 shares), $10.0 million was funded in the form of a promissory note, $1.6 million represented capitalizable acquisition costs and $1.0 million had been previously funded as escrow deposits on the pending acquisitions. With regard to the $10.0 million promissory note subsequently repaid, the Company had the option to repay the note with shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. These aggregate acquisition amounts include the assets acquired pursuant to the transactions described below.

Ft. Walton Beach, Florida

      On January 10, 2003, we completed the asset acquisition of WKSM-FM, WNCV-FM, WYZB-FM, WZNS-FM and WFTW-AM serving the Ft. Walton Beach, Florida market (Arbitron market rank #217) from East Mississippi Broadcasters, Inc. In connection with the acquisition the Company paid approximately $28.5 million in cash and 95,938 shares of Class A Common Stock. This five-station cluster had been operated by the Company under the terms of a local marketing agreement since October 1, 2002.

Macon, Georgia

      On January 31, 2003, we completed the asset acquisition of WDDO-AM, WDEN-AM, WAYS-FM, WMAC-AM, WDEN-FM, WPEZ-FM, WMKS-FM and WMGB-FM serving the Macon, Georgia market (Arbitron market rank #156) from U.S. Broadcasting Limited Partnership, for approximately $35.5 million in cash. This eight-station cluster had been operated by the Company under the terms of a local marketing agreement since October 1, 2002.

F-16

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Nashville, Tennessee

      On July 21, 2003, we completed the asset acquisition of WSM-FM and WWTN-FM serving the Nashville, Tennessee market (Arbitron market rank #45) from Gaylord Entertainment, for $62.5 million in cash. The addition of these two stations increased the Company’s position in the Nashville market to five stations. The two stations acquired from Gaylord Entertainment had been operated by the Company under the terms of a local marketing agreement since April 21, 2003.

      In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $7.1 million of goodwill, all of which is expected to be fully deductible for tax purposes.

      Also in connection with the Company’s acquisition of WSM-FM and WWTN-FM serving the Nashville, Tennessee market, the Company also entered into a Joint Services Agreement (“JSA”) related to a third radio station, WSM-AM. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will provide sales and marketing services to the station for a period of five years and will retain all of the revenues of the station. In return, the licensee of the station received $2.5 million at the commencement date of the agreement and will receive a monthly fee equal to a percentage of the net revenues realized less certain selling costs incurred by the Company. The Company calculated the fair value of the JSA using a discounted cash flows approach and determined that the $2.5 million of consideration paid was an accurate measure of fair value. The value of the JSA will be amortized over the five-year life of the agreement. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, $1.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively, has been classified as current and non current assets related to the JSA.

Huntsville, Alabama

      On July 22, 2003, we completed the stock acquisition of Athens Broadcasting Company, Inc., which owned and operated WZYP-FM, WUSX-FM, WVNN-AM and WUMP-AM serving the Huntsville, Alabama market (Arbitron market rank #118). In connection with the acquisition the Company issued to the former owners 1,215,760 shares of Class A Common Stock. In addition to the station assets and FCC broadcast licenses, we received approximately $2.5 million in working capital as part of the transaction. This four-station cluster had been operated by the Company under the terms of a local marketing agreement since April 1, 2003.

      In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $6.8 million of goodwill, which is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Kansas City, MO

      On December 18, 2003, we completed the asset acquisition of KCHZ-FM and KMJK-FM, serving Kansas City, Missouri (Arbitron market rank #29), from Syncom Radio Corporation and Allur-Kansas City, Inc. In connection with the acquisition the Company paid approximately $5.0 million in cash, 483,671 shares of Class A Common Stock and delivered a $10.0 million promissory note. The promissory note was subsequently repaid in cash in August 2004.

F-17

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with all of the 2003 acquisitions (dollars in thousands):

Current assets, other than cash			$	296
Property and equipment				8,796
Amortized intangible assets:
	Non-compete agreement			50
Unamortized intangible assets:
	Broadcast licenses			168,840
Goodwill				13,912
		Total assets acquired		191,894
Current liabilities				(756	)
Deferred tax liabilities				(6,398	)
		Total liabilities assumed		(7,154	)
Net assets acquired			$	184,740

      The non-compete agreement acquired in 2003 has a useful life of 3 years.

      All of the Company’s acquisitions have been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. As such, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets include the acquired assets and liabilities and the accompanying statements of operations include the results of operations of the acquired entities from their respective dates of acquisition. The accompanying consolidated statements of operations include the results of operations of divested entities through the dates of disposition.

      The unaudited consolidated condensed pro forma results of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, reflect adjustments as if all acquisitions and dispositions completed during 2004 and 2005 had occurred on January 1, 2004, follow (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

	December 31,			December 31,
	2005			2004
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Net revenues	$	327,756		$	324,608
Operating income (loss)	$	(203,650	)	$	78,956
Net income (loss)	$	(213,533	)	$	30,957
Basic income (loss) per common share	$	(3.19	)	$	0.45
Diluted income (loss) per common share	$	(3.19	)	$	0.43

      As of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company operated 2, 12 and 4 stations under LMAs, respectively. The statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 include the revenue and broadcast operating expenses of these radio stations and any related fees associated with the LMA from the effective date of the LMA through the earlier of the acquisition date or December 31.

3. Restructuring Charges (Credits)

      During June 2000 the Company implemented two separate Board-approved restructuring programs. During the second quarter of 2000, the Company recorded a $9.3 million charge to operating expenses related to the restructuring costs.

F-18

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The June 2000 restructuring programs were the result of Board-approved mandates to discontinue the operations of Cumulus Internet Services and to centralize the Company’s corporate and administrative organization and employees in Atlanta, Georgia. The programs included severance and related costs and costs for vacated leased facilities, impaired leasehold improvements at vacated leased facilities, and impaired assets related to the Internet businesses. As of June 30, 2001, the Company had completed the restructuring programs. The remaining portion of the unpaid balance as of that date represented lease obligations and various contractual obligations for services related to the Internet business and has been paid by the Company through the present day consistent with the contracted terms.

      During 2002, the Company successfully negotiated and executed sublease agreements for a majority of the vacated corporate office space in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Chicago, Illinois. During the year ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company reversed $0.2 million, $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of the remaining liability related to lease obligations. The amount reversed in each period represents the Company’s estimate of the reduction of the remaining lease obligations as a result of offsetting contractual sublease income. The reversal of liability related to the subleases has been presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of restructuring charges (credits), consistent with the presentation of the original restructuring charge.

      The following table presents the restructuring liability at December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and the related activity applied to the balances for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):

				Liability			Liability					Liability			Liability
		December 31,		Utilized in			Reversed in			December 31,		Utilized in			Reversed in			December 31,
Expense Category		2002		2003			2003			2003		2004			2004			2004
Lease termination costs — office relocation		$	764	$	(167	)	$	(276	)	$	321	$	(189	)	$	(73	)	$	59
Accrued internet contractual obligations			228		—			—			228		(45	)		—			183
Internet lease termination costs			244		(31	)		(58	)		155		(73	)		(35	)		47
	Restructuring liability totals	$	1,236	$	(198	)	$	(334	)	$	704	$	(307	)	$	(108	)	$	289

				Liability			Liability
		December 31,		Utilized in			Reversed in			December 31,
Expense Category		2004		2005			2005			2005
Lease termination costs — office relocation		$	59		(42	)		(17	)	$	—
Accrued internet contractual obligations			183		—			(183	)		—
Internet lease termination costs			47		(32	)		(15	)		—
	Restructuring liability totals	$	289		(74	)		(215	)	$	—

      Outstanding restructuring liability amounts at December 31, 2004 and 2003 have been presented as a component of current liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets.

F-19

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

4. Property and Equipment

      Property and equipment consists of the following as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

	Estimated
	Useful Life		2005			2004
Land			$	10,530		$	10,667
Broadcasting and other equipment		3 to 7  years		132,114			120,839
Furniture and fixtures		5 years		12,138			11,427
Leasehold improvements		5 years		8,667			8,494
Buildings		20 years		27,483			25,706
Construction in progress				1,836			2,330
				192,768			179,463
Less accumulated depreciation				(105,180	)		(86,257	)
			$	87,588		$	93,206

5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

      The following tables summarize the December 31, 2005 and 2004 gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of amortized and unamortized intangible assets, amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, and the estimated amortization expense for the 5 succeeding fiscal years (dollars in thousands):

		As of December 31,
		2005			2004
Amortized Intangible Assets: Non-Compete Agreements Gross Carrying Value		$	3,100		$	3,850
Accumulated Amortization			(2,787	)		(2,869	)
	Net Value		313			981
Unamortized Intangible Assets:
	Licenses for Digital Broadcasting Technology		1,200			1,200
	FCC Broadcast Licenses		1,039,827			1,130,555
			1,041,027			1,131,755
Aggregate Amortization Expense for Non-Compete Agreements:
	Year ended December 31, 2003	$	933
	Year ended December 31, 2004	$	841
	Year ended December 31, 2005	$	669
Estimated Amortization Expense:
	For the year ending December 31, 2006	$	290
	For the year ending December 31, 2007	$	10
	For the year ending December 31, 2008	$	10
	For the year ending December 31, 2009	$	3
	For the year ending December 31, 2010	$	—

F-20

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      A summary of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 follow (dollars in thousands):

	Goodwill
Balance as of December 31, 2003	$	245,508
Acquisitions		30,552
Dispositions		—
Balance as of December 31, 2004	$	276,060
Acquisitions		11,294
Dispositions		(1,426	)
Impairment charge		(100,411	)
Balance as of December 31, 2005	$	185,517

Licenses for Digital Broadcasting Technology

      On December 21, 2004, the Company purchased 240 perpetual licenses from iBiquity Digital Corporation (“iBiquity”) for $1.2 million in cash. These licenses permit the Company to convert to and utilize iBiquity’s HD Radio^tm technology, which will allow the Company to broadcast in a digital format on 240 of its stations.

      Under the agreement with iBiquity, the Company is obligated to convert the 240 stations to HD Radio^tm technology over a seven-year period. Each station conversion will require an investment in certain capital equipment necessary to broadcast the technology. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company converted ten stations to the HD Radio^tm technology.

Purchase of Station License

      On March 31, 2005, the Company purchased the broadcast license for KVST-FM, licensed to LaPorte, Texas and serving Houston, Texas, for $34.8 million. Of the $34.8 million required to purchase the broadcast license, $31.1 million was funded in cash, $1.0 million had been previously funded in the form of a cash escrow deposit and $2.7 million was paid in capitalizable acquisition costs. During the second quarter of 2005, the Company completed the construction of a broadcast tower and transmitter site for this station and commenced broadcasting and operations.

Broadcast Licenses

      SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to test FCC broadcast licenses for impairment on an annual basis and more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. The Company performs its annual impairment evaluation of existing intangible assets with indefinite lives during the fourth quarter of each year. Accordingly, the Company determines the appropriate reporting unit and then compares the carrying amount of each reporting unit’s broadcast licenses with its fair value. Consistent with prior years, for 2005 the Company determined the reporting unit as a radio market.

      The fair value of broadcast licenses was determined primarily by using a discounted cash flows approach. The fair values derived include assumptions that contain a variety of variables. These variables are based on available industry data, historical experience and estimates of future performance and include, but are not limited to, revenue and expense growth rates for each radio market, revenue and expense growth rates for the Company’s stations in each market, overall discount rates based on the Company’s weighted average cost of capital and acquisition multiples. The assumptions used in estimating the fair

F-21

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

values of broadcast licenses are based on currently available data and management’s best estimates and, accordingly, a change in market conditions or other factors could have a material effect on the estimated value.

      For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company determined that the carrying value of broadcast licenses in certain of its reporting units exceeded their fair value. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $162.4 million, as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, to reduce the carrying value of broadcast licenses.

      Several factors and variables contributed to the decrease in the fair value of certain of our broadcast licenses, including a reduction in management’s projected future cash flows and long-term revenue growth rates utilized in our discounted cash flows approach and overall compression in acquisition multiples associated with comparable broadcast license sales in the industry.

      For the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company determined that the fair values of each reporting unit’s broadcast licenses exceeded their carrying values and, as a result, no impairment existed.

Goodwill

      SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. The Company performs its annual test in the fourth quarter of each year and, in doing so, requires that the Company determine the appropriate reporting unit and compare the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the fair value of any reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, an indication exists that the amount of goodwill attributed to the reporting unit may be impaired and the Company is required to perform a second step of the impairment test. In the second step, the Company compares the implied fair value of each reporting unit’s goodwill, determined by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities, to the carrying amount of the reporting unit. Consistent with prior years, for 2005 the Company determined the reporting unit as a radio market.

      The fair value of reporting units was determined primarily by using a discounted cash flows approach. The fair values derived include assumptions that contain a variety of variables. These variables are based on industry data, historical experience and estimates of future performance and include, but are not limited to, revenue and expense growth rates for each radio market, revenue and expense growth rates for the Company’s stations in each market, overall discount rates based on the Company’s weighted average cost of capital and acquisition multiples. The assumptions used in estimating the fair values of goodwill are based on currently available data and management’s best estimates and, accordingly, a change in market conditions or other factors could have a material effect on the estimated values.

      For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company determined that the carrying value of certain reporting units exceeded their fair values. Accordingly the Company recorded an impairment charge of $100.4 million, as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, to reduce the carrying value of goodwill.

      Several factors and variables contributed to the decrease in the fair value of certain of its reporting units, including a reduction in management’s projected future cash flows and long-term revenue growth rates utilized in its discounted cash flows approach and overall compression in acquisition multiples associated with comparable radio station sales in the industry.

      For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded their carrying values and, as a result, no impairment existed.

F-22

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

6. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

      Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

	2005		2004
Accounts payable	$	1,932	$	2,108
Accrued compensation		1,821		1,937
Accrued commissions		2,575		2,994
Accrued taxes		9,156		1,097
Barter payable		1,499		1,784
Accrued professional fees		1,409		1,120
Due to seller of acquired companies		1,346		534
Accrued restructuring costs		—		289
Accrued interest		1,372		857
Accrued employee benefits		4,106		2,808
Accrued acquisition liabilities		—		140
Non-cash contract termination liability		1,404		—
Other		2,941		3,410
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	29,561	$	19,078

7. Derivative Instruments

      The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This standard requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Fair value changes are recorded in income for any contracts not classified as qualifying hedging instruments. For derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedge instruments, the effective portion of the derivative fair value change must be recorded through other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity.

New Derivative Instruments

      In May 2005, Cumulus entered into a forward-starting LIBOR based interest rate swap arrangement (the “May 2005 Swap”) to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from interest rate risk attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate of LIBOR. The May 2005 Swap, which will be effective as of the end of the term of the Company’s currently existing swap (see further discussion below) and from March 2006 through March 2009, will change the variable-rate cash flow exposure on $400 million of the Company’s long-term bank borrowings to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into a receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swap. Under the May 2005 Swap, Cumulus will receive LIBOR based variable interest rate payments and make fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating fixed-rate long-term debt. The May 2005 Swap is accounted for as a qualifying cash flow hedge of the future variable rate interest payments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, whereby changes in the fair market value are reflected as adjustments to the fair value of the derivative instrument as reflected on the accompanying balance sheets.

      The fair value of the May 2005 Swap is determined periodically by obtaining quotations from the financial institution that is the counterparty to the Company’s swap arrangement. The fair value represents an estimate of the net amount that Cumulus would receive if the agreement was transferred to another party or cancelled as of the date of the valuation. Changes in the fair value of the May 2005 Swap are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, or AOCI, which is an element of stockholders’

F-23

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

equity. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 reflects other long-term assets of $9.2 million to reflect the fair value of the May 2005 Swap.

      In May 2005, Cumulus also entered into an interest rate option agreement (the “May 2005 Option”), which provides for the counterparty to the May 2005 Swap, Bank of America, to unilaterally extend the period of the swap for two additional years, from March of 2009 through March of 2011. This option may only be exercised in March of 2009. This instrument is not highly effective in mitigating the risks in cash flows, and therefore is deemed speculative and its changes in value are accounted for as a current element of non-operating results. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2005 includes $0.9 million of net gains and the balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 reflects other long-term liabilities of $2.3 million to reflect the fair value of the May 2005 Option.

Pre-Existing Derivative Instruments

      Cumulus previously entered into a LIBOR-based interest rate swap arrangement in March 2003 (the “March 2003 Swap”) to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from interest rate risk attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate of LIBOR. The March 2003 Swap changed the variable-rate cash flow exposure on $300.0 million of the Company’s long-term bank borrowings to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into a receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swap. Under the interest rate swap, Cumulus receives LIBOR based variable interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating fixed-rate long-term debt. The March 2003 Swap is accounted for as a qualifying cash flow hedge of the future variable rate interest payments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, whereby changes in the fair market value are reflected as adjustments to the fair value of the derivative instrument as reflected on the accompanying balance sheets.

      The fair value of the March 2003 Swap has been determined periodically by obtaining quotations from the financial institution that is the counterparty to the March 2003 Swap. The fair value represents an estimate of the net amount that Cumulus would receive if the agreement was transferred to another party or cancelled as of the date of the valuation. Changes in the fair value of the March 2003 Swap are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, or AOCI, which is an element of stockholders’ equity. During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, $3.9 million, $1.8 million and $2.0 million of income, respectively, related to the March 2003 Swap was reported as a reduction of interest expense and represents a yield adjustment of the hedged debt obligation. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 reflects other long-term assets of $1.5 million to reflect the fair value of the March 2003 Swap.

      In March 2003, Cumulus also entered into an interest rate option agreement in March 2003 (the “March 2003 Option”), which provided for the counterparty to the agreement, Bank of America, to unilaterally extend the period of the March 2003 Swap for two additional years, from March of 2006 through March of 2008. The March 2003 Option could only be exercised in March of 2006. This instrument is not highly effective in mitigating the risks in cash flows, and therefore is deemed speculative and its changes in value are accounted for as a current element of non-operating results.

      In May 2005 and in connection with the execution of the May 2005 Option, the Company terminated the March 2003 Option. As of the termination date, the balance sheet reflected a long-term liability of less than $0.1 million, which the Company eliminated and recorded as a component of interest expense as a net gain. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 interest expense includes net gains of $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, to record the changes in the value of the March 2003 Option.

F-24

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

8. Long-Term Debt

      The Company’s long-term debt consists of the following at December 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

	2005		2004
Term loan and revolving credit facilities at 5.63% and 4.15%, respectively	$	569,000	$	482,102
Other		—		—
		569,000		482,102
Less: Current portion of long-term debt		—		(40,957	)
	$	569,000	$	441,145

      A summary of the future maturities of long-term debt follows (dollars in thousands):

2006	$	—
2007		20,000
2008		20,000
2009		60,000
2010		60,000
Thereafter		409,000
	$	569,000

      On July 14, 2005, the Company secured a new $800 million credit facility, which provides for a seven-year $400.0 million revolving credit facility and a seven-year $400.0 million term loan facility. The proceeds of the term loan facility, fully funded on July 14, 2005, and drawings on that date of $123.0 million on the revolving credit facility, were used by the Company primarily to repay all amounts owed under its prior credit facility.

      In connection with the retirement of the Company’s pre-existing credit facilities, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1.2 million, which was comprised entirely of previously capitalized debt issuance costs. In connection with the new credit facility, the Company capitalized approximately $4.3 million of debt issuance costs which will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.

      The Company’s obligations under the credit facility are collateralized by substantially all of its assets in which a security interest may lawfully be granted (including FCC licenses held by our subsidiaries), including, without limitation, intellectual property, real property, and all of the capital stock of its direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (except the capital stock of Broadcast Software International, Inc., referred to as BSI) and 65% of the capital stock of any first-tier foreign subsidiary. The obligations under the credit facility are also guaranteed by each of the direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, except BSI, and are required to be guaranteed by any additional subsidiaries the Company acquires.

      The term-loan facility will mature on July 14, 2012 and will amortize in equal quarterly installments beginning on March 31, 2007, in quarterly amounts as follows: for each quarter in 2007 and 2008, 1.25%; for each quarter in 2009 and 2010, 3.75%; and, for each quarter beginning on March 31, 2011 and through July 14, 2012, 10.0%. The revolving credit facility will also mature on July 14, 2012 and the commitment will remain unchanged up to that date.

      Both the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate equal to the Alternate Base Rate (as defined under the terms of the credit agreement governing our

F-25

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

credit facility, 7.25% as of December 31, 2005) plus a margin ranging between 0.0% to 0.25%, or the Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined under the terms of the credit agreement, 4.38% as of December 31, 2005) plus a margin ranging between 0.675% to 1.25% (in each case dependent upon our leverage ratio). At December 31, 2005 our effective interest rate, excluding the interest rate swap agreement discussed below, on loan amounts outstanding under the credit facility was 5.63%.

      In March 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixed the interest rate, based on LIBOR, on $300.0 million of floating rate bank borrowings for a three-year period. As a result and including the fixed component of the swap, at December 31, 2005, the Company’s effective interest rate on loan amounts outstanding under the credit agreement was 4.34%.

      In May 2005, we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that will become effective in March 2006, following the termination of the Company’s current swap agreement. When effective, this swap agreement will effectively fix the interest rate, based on LIBOR, on $400.0 million of the Company’s floating rate bank borrowings through March 2009.

      A commitment fee calculated at a rate ranging from 0.25% to 0.375% per year (depending upon our leverage levels) of the average daily amount available under the revolving credit facility is payable quarterly in arrears, and fees in respect of letters of credit issued in accordance with the credit agreement governing our credit facility, equal to the interest rate margin then applicable to Eurodollar Rate loans under the revolving credit facility are payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, a “fronting fee” of 0.25% is payable quarterly to the issuing bank.

      The Company is required to make certain mandatory prepayments of the term loan facility and there will be automatic reductions in the availability of the revolving credit facility under certain circumstances, including the incurrence of certain indebtedness and upon consummation of certain asset sales. In these instances, the Company is required to apply 100% of the net proceeds to the outstanding balance on the credit facility. The Company does not expect to make any mandatory prepayments in 2006.

      Under the terms of the credit agreement, the Company is subject to certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including, but not limited to maximum leverage covenants, minimum interest coverage covenants, limitations on capital expenditures, asset dispositions and the payment of dividends. The failure to comply with the covenants would result in an event of default, which in turn would permit acceleration of debt under the credit agreement. At December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with these financial and operating covenants.

      The terms of the credit agreement contain events of default after expiration of applicable grace periods, including failure to make payments on the credit facility, breach of covenants, breach of representations and warranties, invalidity of the credit agreement and related documents, cross default under other agreements or conditions relating to indebtedness of the Company or its restricted subsidiaries, certain events of liquidation, moratorium, insolvency, bankruptcy or similar events, enforcement of security, certain litigation or other proceedings, and certain events relating to changes in control. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the terms of the credit agreement, the majority of the lenders are able to declare all amounts under the credit facility to be due and payable and take certain other actions, including enforcement of rights in respect of the collateral. The majority of the banks extending credit under each term loan facility and the majority of the banks under each revolving credit facility may terminate such term loan facility and such revolving credit facility, respectively, upon an event of default.

9. Redeemable Preferred Stock

      We issued $125.0 million of our Series A Preferred Stock in connection with our initial public offering on July 1, 1998. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive cumulative dividends at an annual rate equal to 13³/4% of the liquidation preference per share of Series A Preferred

F-26

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Stock, payable quarterly, in arrears. On or before July 1, 2003, we could have, at our option, paid dividends in cash or in additional fully paid and non-assessable shares of Series A Preferred Stock. From July 1, 1998 until March 31, 2002, we issued an additional $41.9 million of shares of Series A Preferred Stock as dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock. Prior to the redemption of all of the outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock on July 7, 2003, as discussed below, all of the dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock were paid in shares, except for (1) $3.5 million of cash dividends paid in fiscal 2000 (2) $11.8 million of cash dividends paid in fiscal 2002 and (3) $1.1 million of cash dividends paid in fiscal 2003.

      During 2002 and the first quarter of 2003, we negotiated and completed the repurchase of 125,221 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock for $140.8 million in cash. A redemption premium of $0.6 million associated with the repurchases of 4,900 shares during the three months ended March 31, 2003 has been included as a component of preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. On July 7, 2003 we completed the redemption of all outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. The 9,268 shares outstanding were redeemed at a redemption price of 106.875% ($0.6 million in redemption premiums) plus accrued dividends through July 6, 2003, all in accordance with the terms and conditions of the stock designations governing the Series A Preferred Stock.

10. Stockholders’ Equity

(a)     Common Stock

      Each share of Class A Common Stock entitles its holders to one vote.

      Except upon the occurrence of certain events, holders of the Class B Common Stock are not entitled to vote. The Class B Common Stock is convertible at any time, or from time to time, at the option of the holder of such Class B Common Stock (provided that the prior consent of any governmental authority required to make such conversion lawful shall have been obtained) without cost to such holder (except any transfer taxes that may be payable if certificates are to be issued in a name other than that in which the certificate surrendered is registered), into Class A Common Stock on a share-for-share basis; provided that the Board of Directors has determined that the holder of Class A Common Stock at the time of conversion would not disqualify the Company under, or violate, any rules and regulations of the FCC.

      Subject to certain exceptions, each share of Class C Common Stock entitles its holders to ten votes. The Class C Common Stock is convertible at any time, or from time to time, at the option of the holder of such Class C Common Stock (provided that the prior consent of any governmental authority required to make such conversion lawful shall have been obtained) without cost to such holder (except any transfer taxes that may be payable if certificates are to be issued in a name other than that in which the certificate surrendered is registered), into Class A Common Stock on a share-for-share basis; provided that the Board of Directors has determined that the holder of Class A Common Stock at the time of conversion would not disqualify the Company under, or violate, any rules and regulations of the FCC.

(b)     Share Repurchases

      On September 28, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the purchase, from time to time, of up to $100.0 million of its Class A Common Stock, subject to the terms of the credit agreement. Subsequently, on December 7, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to an additional $100.0 million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock.

      During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and under the share repurchase plans described above, the Company repurchased 7,766,223 and 1,004,429 shares of its Class A Common Stock in the open market at an average price of $12.31 and $14.56 per share, respectively.

F-27

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      As of December 31, 2005, the Company had authority to repurchase an additional $89.6 million of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, subject to the terms of the credit agreement.

(c)     Stock Purchase Plan

      In 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted and the Company’s stockholders subsequently approved the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan is designed to qualify for certain income tax benefits for employees under the Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan allows qualifying employees to purchase Class A Common Stock at the end of each calendar year, commencing with the calendar year beginning January 1, 1999, at 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of the Class A Common Stock on the first and last trading days of the year. The amount each employee can purchase is limited to the lesser of (i) 15% of pay or (ii) $0.025 million of stock value on the first trading day of the year. An employee must be employed at least six months as of the first trading day of the year in order to participate in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

      In June 2002, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan which increased the aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock available for purchase under the plan from 1,000,000 shares to 2,000,000, an increase of 1,000,000 shares.

      The following table summarizes the number of shares of Class A Common stock issued as a result of employee participation in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan since its inception in 1999 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

			Class A
	Issue		Common Shares
Issue Date	Price		Issued
January 10, 2000	$	14.18		17,674
January 17, 2001	$	3.08		50,194
January 8-23, 2002	$	3.19		558,161
January 2-24, 2003	$	12.61		124,876
January 26-30, 2004	$	13.05		130,194
January 2-28, 2005	$	12.82		136,110
January 2-31, 2006	$	10.55		124,598

      Following the issuance of shares in January 2006, related to the 2005 plan year, there remain 858,193 shares of Class A Common Stock authorized and available under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

11. Stock Options and Restricted Stock

2004 Equity Incentive Plan

      The Board of Directors adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan on March 19, 2004. The 2004 Equity Incentive Plan was subsequently approved by the Company’s stockholders on April 30, 2004. The purpose of the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is to attract and retain officers, key employees, non-employee directors and consultants for the Company and its subsidiaries and to provide such persons incentives and rewards for superior performance. The aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock subject to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is 2,795,000. Of the aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock available, up to 1,400,000 shares may be granted as incentive stock options, or ISOs, and up to 925,000 shares may be awarded as either restricted or deferred shares. In addition, no one person may receive options exercisable for more than 500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock in any one calendar year.

F-28

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The 2004 Equity Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant nonqualified stock options and ISOs, as defined in Section 422 of the Code. The exercise price of an option awarded under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan may not be less than the closing price of the Class A Common Stock on the last trading day before the grant. Options will be exercisable during the period specified in each award agreement and will be exercisable in installments pursuant to a Board-designated vesting schedule. The Board may also provide for acceleration of options awarded in the event of a change in control, as defined by the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.

      The Board may also authorize the grant or sale of restricted stock to participants. Each such grant will constitute an immediate transfer of the ownership of the restricted shares to the participant, entitling the participant to voting, dividend and other ownership rights, but subject to substantial risk of forfeiture for a period of not less than two years (to be determined by the Board at the time of the grant) and restrictions on transfer (to be determined by the Board at the time of the grant). The Board may also provide for the elimination of restrictions in the event of a change in control.

      Finally, the Board may authorize the grant or sale of deferred stock to participants. Awards of deferred stock constitute an agreement we make to deliver shares of our Class A Common Stock to the participant in the future, in consideration of the performance of services, but subject to the fulfillment of such conditions during the deferral period as the Board may specify. The grants or sales of deferred stock will be subject to a deferral period of at least one year. During the deferral period, the participant will have no right to transfer any rights under the award and will have no rights of ownership in the deferred shares, including no right to vote such shares, though the Board may authorize the payment of any dividend equivalents on the shares. The Board may also provide for the elimination of the deferral period in the event of a change in control.

      No grant, of any type, may be awarded under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan after April 30, 2014.

      The Board of Directors administers the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors may from time to time delegate all or any part of its authority under the 2004 Plan to the Compensation Committee of the Board. The Board of Directors has full and exclusive power to interpret the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and to adopt rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying out the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan as it may deem necessary or proper.

      Under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, current and prospective employees, non-employee directors, consultants or other persons who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate.

      As of December 31, 2005, there are outstanding options to purchase a total of 1,514,997 shares of Class A Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $14.04 to $19.38 per share under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. These options vest quarterly over four years, with the possible acceleration of vesting for some options if certain performance criteria are met. In addition, all options vest upon a change of control as more fully described in the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.

      On April 25, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted 145,000 restricted shares of its Class A Common Stock to certain officers, pursuant to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. Consistent with the terms of the awards, one-half of the shares granted will vest after two years of continuous employment. An additional one-eighth of the remaining restricted shares will vest each quarter during the third and fourth years following the date of grant. The fair value at the date of grant of these shares was $1.9 million. Stock compensation expense for these fixed awards will be recognized on a straight-line basis over each award’s vesting period. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recognized $0.3 million of non-cash stock compensation expense related to these restricted shares.

      On October 14, 2004, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. This agreement provided

F-29

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

that Mr. Dickey would be granted 250,000 restricted shares of Class A Common Stock in each of 2005, 2006 and 2007.

      In accordance with his agreement, on April 25, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted 250,000 restricted shares to Mr. Dickey. Following the award, management concluded that, in accordance with SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Mr. Dickey’s employment agreement created an effective grant date for accounting purposes as of the execution date of the agreement (October 14, 2004), for both the restricted shares issued in April 2005 and the restricted shares the Company is obligated to issue in 2006 and 2007. As a result, management believes the Company should have commenced amortizing non-cash stock compensation expense associated with the restricted shares contemplated by Mr. Dickey’s employment agreement beginning in the fourth quarter of 2004. Management assessed the materiality of the related non-cash stock compensation expense attributable to 2004 and concluded that due to the immateriality of the charges and the insignificant impact on the financial statements taken as a whole, no restatement of prior periods was necessary. As a result, management recorded the expense attributable to 2004 during the year ended December 31, 2005. Non-cash stock compensation attributable to 2004, recorded in 2005, totaled $0.5 million. Non-cash stock compensation expense attributable to Mr. Dickey’s shares for the year ended December 31, 2005 totaled $2.4 million.

      Consistent with terms of the awards and Mr. Dickey’s employment agreement, of the restricted shares issued to Mr. Dickey in April 2005, 125,000 shares were granted as time-vested restricted shares and 125,000 were issued as performance restricted shares. The time-vested restricted shares are subject to the continued employment of Mr. Dickey. One-half of the time-vested shares will vest after two years of continuous employment. An additional one-eighth of the remaining time-vested shares will vest each quarter during the third and fourth years following the date of grant.

      Vesting of one-half of the performance restricted shares is dependent upon the achievement of certain board-approved financial targets for the first fiscal year following the date of grant and two years of continuous employment. Vesting of the remaining one-half of the performance restricted shares is dependent upon achievement of certain board approved financial targets for the second fiscal year following the date of grant and two years of continuous employment. Any performance restricted shares that do not vest based on the performance measures will vest on the eighth anniversary of the grant date, provided that Mr. Dickey has remained employed with the Company through that date.

      The fair value on the effective grant date (October 14, 2004) of the restricted shares to be issued to Mr. Dickey, pursuant to his employment agreement, was $10.2 million.

      Subsequent to December 31, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determined that the approved financial target for the first fiscal year following the date of grant and associated with one-half of the performance restricted shares granted in April 2005 was not achieved. As a result, these shares converted to time-vested shares and will vest on the eighth anniversary of the grant date.

      As of December 31, 2005, management believes it is probable that the remaining performance targets associated with Mr. Dickey’s performance restricted shares will be met.

2002 Stock Incentive Plan

      The Board of Directors adopted the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan on March 1, 2002. The purpose of the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan is to attract and retain certain selected officers, key employees, non-employee directors and consultants whose skills and talents are important to the Company’s operations and reward them for making major contributions to the success of the Company. The aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock subject to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan is 2,000,000, all of which may be

F-30

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

granted as incentive stock options. In addition, no one person may receive options for more than 500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock in any one calendar year.

      The 2002 Stock Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options (“ISOs”), as defined in Sections 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). No options may be granted under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan after May 3, 2012.

      The Compensation Committee administers the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee has full and exclusive power to interpret the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan and to adopt rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying out the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan as it may deem necessary or proper.

      Under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, current and prospective employees, non-employee directors, consultants or other persons who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate. As of December 31, 2005, there were outstanding options to purchase a total of 1,722,691 shares of Class A Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $14.03 to $19.38 per share under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. These options vest quarterly over four years, with the possible acceleration of vesting for some options if certain performance criteria are met. In addition, all options vest upon a change of control as more fully described in the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan.

2000 Stock Incentive Plan

      The Board of Directors adopted the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan on July 31, 2000, and subsequently amended the Plan on February 23, 2001. The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan was subsequently approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 4, 2001. The purpose of the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan is to attract and retain certain selected officers, key employees, non-employee directors and consultants whose skills and talents are important to the Company’s operations and reward them for making major contributions to the success of the Company. The aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock subject to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan is 2,750,000, all of which may be granted as incentive stock options. In addition, no one person may receive options for more than 500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock in any one calendar year.

      The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant nonqualified stock options and ISOs, as defined in Sections 422 of the Code. No options may be granted under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan after October 4, 2010.

      The Compensation Committee administers the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee has full and exclusive power to interpret the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and to adopt rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying out the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan as it may deem necessary or proper.

      Under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, current and prospective employees, non-employee directors, consultants or other persons who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate. As of December 31, 2005, there are outstanding options to purchase a total of 2,132,815 shares of Class A Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $3.75 to $14.62 per share under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. These options vest, in general, quarterly over four years, with the possible acceleration of vesting for some options if certain performance criteria are met. In addition, all options vest upon a change of control as more fully described in the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

F-31

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

1999 Stock Incentive Plan

      In 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors and the Company’s stockholders adopted the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan to provide officers, other key employees and non-employee directors of the Company (other than participants in the Company’s Executive Plan described below), as well as consultants to the Company, with additional incentives by increasing their proprietary interest in the Company. An aggregate of 900,000 shares of Class A Common Stock are subject to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, all of which may be awarded as incentive stock options. In addition, subject to certain equitable adjustments, no one person will be eligible to receive options for more than 300,000 shares in any one calendar year.

      The 1999 Stock Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant awards in the form of non-qualified stock options and ISO’s. All stock options awarded under the plan will be granted at an exercise price of not less than fair market value of the Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. No award will be granted under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan after August 30, 2009.

      The 1999 Stock Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which has exclusive authority to grant awards under the plan and to make all interpretations and determinations affecting the plan. The Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the individuals to whom awards are granted, the amount of such award, any applicable vesting schedule, whether awards vest upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined in the plan) and other terms of any award. The Compensation Committee may delegate to certain senior officers of the Company its duties under the plan subject to such conditions or limitations as the Compensation Committee may establish. Any award made to a non-employee director must be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. In the event of any changes in the capital structure of the Company, the Compensation Committee will make proportional adjustments to outstanding awards so that the net value of the award is not changed.

      As of December 31, 2005, there are outstanding options to purchase a total of 819,254 shares of Class A Common Stock exercisable at prices ranging from $6.4375 to $27.875 per share under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. These options vest, in general, over five years, with the possible acceleration of vesting for some options if certain performance criteria are met. In addition, all options vest upon a change of control as more fully described in the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.

1998 Stock Incentive Plan

      In 1998, the Company adopted the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. An aggregate of 1,288,834 shares of Class A Common Stock are subject to the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, all of which may be awarded as incentive stock options, and a maximum of 100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock may be awarded as restricted stock. In addition, subject to certain equitable adjustments, no one person will be eligible to receive options for more than 300,000 shares in any one calendar year and the maximum amount of restricted stock which will be awarded to any one person during any calendar year is $0.5 million.

      The 1998 Stock Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant awards in the form of non-qualified stock options and ISO’s and restricted shares of Class A Common Stock. All stock options awarded under the plan will be granted at an exercise price of not less than fair market value of the Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. No award will be granted under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan after June 22, 2008.

      The 1998 Stock Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which has exclusive authority to grant awards under the plan and to make all interpretations and determinations affecting the plan. The Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the individuals to whom awards are granted, the amount of such award, any applicable vesting schedule, whether awards vest upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined in the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan) and other terms of any award. The Compensation Committee may delegate to certain senior officers of the Company its

F-32

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

duties under the plan subject to such conditions or limitations as the Compensation Committee may establish. Any award made to a non-employee director must be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. In the event of any changes in the capital structure of the Company, the Compensation Committee will make proportional adjustments to outstanding awards so that the net value of the award is not changed.

      As of December 31, 2005, there are outstanding options to purchase a total of 1,069,821 shares of Class A Common Stock exercisable at prices ranging from $5.92 to $15.00 per share under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. These options vest, in general, over five years, with the possible acceleration of vesting for some options if certain performance criteria are met. In addition, all options vest upon a change of control as more fully described in the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.

1999 Executive Stock Incentive Plan

      In 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors and the Company’s stockholders adopted the 1999 Executive Stock Incentive Plan (the “1999 Executive Plan”) to provide certain key executives of the Company with additional incentives by increasing their proprietary interest in the Company. An aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock or C Common Stock are subject to the 1999 Executive Plan. In addition, no one person will be eligible to receive options for more than 500,000 shares in any one calendar year. In accordance with the terms of the 1999 Executive Plan, Richard W. Weening, former Executive Chairman, Treasurer and Director, and Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer are the sole participants in the 1999 Executive Plan.

      The 1999 Executive Plan permits the Company to grant awards in the form of non-qualified stock options and ISO’s.

      Stock options under the 1999 Executive Plan were granted on August 30, 1999 and April 12, 2001 at exercise prices ranging from $5.92 to $27.875 per share and generally vest quarterly in equal installments over a four-year period (subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances).

      The 1999 Executive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which will have exclusive authority to grant awards under the Executive Plan and to make all interpretations and determinations affecting the 1999 Executive Plan. In the event of any changes in the capital structure of the Company, the Compensation Committee will make proportional adjustments to outstanding awards granted under the 1999 Executive Plan so that the net value of the award is not changed. As of December 31, 2005, there are outstanding options to purchase a total of 500,000 shares of Class C Common Stock and 406,250 shares of Class A Common Stock under the 1999 Executive Plan.

1998 Executive Stock Incentive Plan

      In 1998, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 1998 Executive Stock Incentive Plan (the “1998 Executive Plan”). An aggregate of 2,001,380 shares of Class A or C Common Stock are subject to the 1998 Executive Plan. In addition, no one person will be eligible to receive options for more than 1,000,690 shares in any one calendar year. In accordance with the terms of the 1998 Executive Plan, Richard W. Weening, former Executive Chairman, Treasurer and Director, and Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, are the sole participants in the 1998 Executive Plan.

      The 1998 Executive Plan permits the Company to grant awards in the form of non-qualified stock options and ISO’s.

      Stock options under the 1998 Executive Plan were granted on July 1, 1998 and are divided into three groups. Group 1 consists of time vested options with an exercise price equal to $14.00 per share and vest quarterly in equal installments over a four-year period (subject to accelerated vesting in certain

F-33

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

circumstances). Group 2 and Group 3 also consist of time-based options which vest in four equal annual installments on July 1, 1999, July 1, 2000, July 1, 2001 and July 1, 2002 (subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances). The first installment of both the Group 2 options and Group 3 options were exercisable at a price of $14.00 per share on July 1, 1999 and subsequent installments are exercisable at a price 15% (or 20% in the case of Group 3 options) greater than the prior year’s exercise price for each of the next three years. Stock options under the 1998 Executive Plan were also granted on April 12, 2001. These options vest quarterly in equal installments over a four year period and were issued with an exercise price of $5.92.

      The 1998 Executive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which will have exclusive authority to grant awards under the 1998 Executive Plan and to make all interpretations and determinations affecting the 1998 Executive Plan. In the event of any changes in the capital structure of the Company, the Compensation Committee will make proportional adjustments to outstanding awards granted under the 1998 Executive Plan so that the net value of the award is not changed. As of December 31, 2005, there are outstanding options to purchase a total of 1,000,690 shares of Class C Common Stock and 906,702 shares of Class A Common Stock under the 1998 Executive Plan.

      The following tables represent a summary of options outstanding and exercisable at and activity during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

				Weighted
				Average
	Shares			Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2002		8,009,955		$	13.24
Granted		1,407,200			15.35
Exercised		(233,267	)		7.52
Canceled		(145,953	)		13.73
Outstanding at December 31, 2003		9,037,935		$	13.71
Granted		1,085,000			19.38
Exercised		(162,165	)		7.19
Canceled		(113,590	)		17.51
Outstanding at December 31, 2004		9,847,180		$	14.40
Granted		514,750			14.13
Exercised		(98,142	)		7.58
Canceled		(190,568	)		17.37
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		10,073,220		$	14.40

F-34

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005:

			Weighted Average		Weighted				Weighted
Range of	Outstanding as of		Remaining		Average		Exercisable as of		Average
Exercise Prices	December 31, 2005		Contractual Life		Exercise Price		December 31, 2005		Exercise Price
$ 2.79-$ 5.58		73,377		4.9 years	$	3.94		73,377	$	3.94
$ 5.58-$ 8.36		2,506,751		5.0 years	$	6.19		2,506,751	$	6.19
$ 8.36-$11.15		30,000		5.3 years	$	9.14		30,000	$	9.14
$11.15-$13.94		184,000		5.7 years	$	12.80		184,000	$	12.80
$13.94-$16.73		4,462,020		5.6 years	$	14.35		3,752,252	$	14.38
$16.73-$19.51		1,625,759		7.3 years	$	19.02		895,770	$	18.74
$19.51-$22.30		171,994		2.5 years	$	20.67		171,994	$	20.67
$22.30-$25.09		93,815		2.5 years	$	24.19		93,815	$	24.19
$25.09-$27.88		925,504		3.7 years	$	27.88		925,504	$	27.88
		10,073,220		5.5 years	$	14.40		8,633,463	$	13.99

12. Income Taxes

      Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

			2005			2004		2003
Current tax expense:
	Federal		$	—		$	—	$	—
	State and local			5,911			—		1,546
		Total current expense	$	5,911		$	—	$	1,546
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
	Federal			(19,946	)		25,547		23,132
	State and local			—			—		—
		Total deferred expense (benefit)		(19,946	)		25,547		23,132
		Total income tax expense (benefit)	$	(14,035	)	$	25,547	$	24,678

      Total income tax expense (benefit) differed from the amount computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate of 35% for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 due to the following (dollars in thousands):

		2005			2004		2003
Pretax income (loss) at federal statutory rate		$	(79,591	)	$	19,571	$	10,402
	State income tax expense (benefit), net of federal benefit		(8,530	)		2,729		2,996
	Impairment charge		32,305			—		—
	Reserve for contingencies		5,911			—		—
	Other		(29	)		71		106
	Increase in valuation allowance		35,899			3,176		11,174
	Net income tax expense (benefit)	$	(14,035	)	$	25,547	$	24,678

F-35

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are presented below:

			2005			2004
Current deferred tax assets:
	Accounts receivable		$	944		$	1,051
	Accrued expenses and other			2,590			2,606
		Current deferred tax assets		3,534			3,657
	Less: valuation allowance			(3,380	)		(3,241	)
		Net current deferred tax assets		154			416
Noncurrent deferred tax assets:
	Intangible and other assets			39,946			4,129
	Other liabilities			7,336			1,729
	Net operating loss			75,492			85,846
		Noncurrent deferred tax assets		122,774			91,704
	Less: valuation allowance			(117,090	)		(81,330	)
		Net noncurrent deferred tax assets		5,684			10,374
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities:
	Intangible assets			203,706			223,653
	Property and equipment			5,794			10,722
	Other			54			1,610
		Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities		209,565			235,985
	Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities			203,870			225,611
	Net deferred tax liabilities		$	203,716		$	225,195

      Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed by applying the Federal income tax rate in effect to the gross amounts of temporary differences and other tax attributes, such as net operating loss carry-forwards. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of these deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the period in which these temporary differences become deductible.

      In connection with a review of the Company’s deferred tax accounts, an adjustment for $8.6 million was made in 2005 to correct the January 1, 2003 stockholders’ equity balance and reduce deferred tax liabilities. This correction was not material to stockholder’s equity, deferred tax liabilities or the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

      During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recorded deferred tax expense of $27.4 million to establish valuation allowances against net operating loss carry-forwards generated during the current year, resulting from amortization of goodwill and broadcast licenses that is deductible for tax purposes, but is not amortized in the financial statements. This charge was offset by a $47.4 million deferred tax benefit resulting from the reversal of deferred tax liabilities in connection with the impairment of certain broadcast licenses and goodwill. Also during the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company revised its estimate for potential tax exposure at the state and local level and, accordingly, recorded $5.9 million to reserve for these contingencies.

F-36

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded deferred tax expense of $25.7 million to establish valuation allowances against net operating loss carry-forwards generated during the current year, resulting from amortization of goodwill and broadcast licenses that is deductible for tax purposes, but is not amortized in the financial statements. This charge was partially offset by a $0.1 million tax benefit and reduction in valuation allowance resulting from certain adjustments made to net operating loss carry-forwards in the Company’s 2003 tax return. In addition, the Company recorded a $22.4 million reduction in the valuation allowance resulting from the utilization of loss carry-forwards against current year taxable income, and a $2.5 million reduction in the valuation allowance resulting from the acquisition of deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting that are scheduled to reverse within the Company’s net operating loss carry-forward period.

      During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded deferred tax expense of $23.3 million to establish valuation allowances against net operating loss carry-forwards generated during the current year, resulting from amortization of goodwill and broadcast licenses that is deductible for tax purposes, but is not amortized in the financial statements. This charge was partially offset by a $0.3 million tax benefit and reduction in valuation allowance resulting from certain adjustments made to net operating loss carry-forwards in the Company’s 2002 tax return. In addition, the Company recorded an $11.8 million reduction in the valuation allowance resulting from the utilization of loss carry-forwards against current year taxable income, and a $0.9 million reduction in the valuation allowance resulting from the acquisition of deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting that are scheduled to reverse within the Company’s net operating loss carry-forward period.

      Management has determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of its deferred tax assets, net of the existing valuation allowances, at December 31, 2005.

      At December 31, 2005, the Company has federal net operating loss carry forwards available to offset future income of approximately $189.3 million, of which $3.3 million will expire in 2012 and the remaining $186.0 will expire in the years 2018 through 2025.

F-37

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

13. Earnings Per Share

      The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts).

			2005			2004		2003
Numerator:
	Net income (loss)		$	(213,367	)	$	30,369	$	5,041
	Preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums			—			—		(1,908	)
	Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) per common share		$	(213,367	)	$	30,369	$	3,133
Denominator:
	Denominator for basic income (loss) per common share —
		Weighted average common shares outstanding		66,911			68,789		64,306
Effect of dilutive securities:
	Options			—			2,519		2,628
	Restricted shares			—			—		—
	Note payable			—			—		16
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per common share				66,911			71,308		66,950
Basic income (loss) per common share			$	(3.19	)	$	0.44	$	0.05
Diluted income (loss) per common share			$	(3.19	)	$	0.43	$	0.05

      The following potentially dilutive shares were not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as their effect would be antidilutive:

	2005
Restricted shares of Class A Common Stock		395,000
Options to purchase class A common stock		8,572,530
Options to purchase class C common stock		1,500,690

      Stock options to purchase 2,696,754 and 1,674,914 shares of common stock were outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per common share because the option exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period and their effect would be antidilutive.

14.     Leases

      The Company has non-cancelable operating leases, primarily for land, tower space, office space, certain office equipment and vehicles. The operating leases generally contain renewal options for periods ranging from one to ten years and require the Company to pay all executory costs such as maintenance and insurance. Rental expense for operating leases was approximately $8.6 million, $7.8 million and $6.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

F-38

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year) as of December 31, 2005 are as follows:

Year Ending December 31:
2006	$	8,178
2007		7,713
2008		6,337
2009		4,918
2010		3,943
Thereafter		22,035
	$	53,124

15. Commitments and Contingencies

      As of December 31, 2005 the Company has entered into various agreements to acquire three stations across two markets for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.6 million in cash. The ability of the Company to complete the pending acquisitions is dependent upon the Company’s ability to borrow under the terms of its credit facility or to obtain additional equity and/or debt financing. We intend to finance our pending acquisitions with cash on hand, cash flow from operations, the proceeds of borrowings under our credit facility or future credit facilities, and other to be identified sources. There can be no assurance the Company will be able to obtain such financing beyond cash reserves. As of December 31, 2005, $2.6 million of escrow deposits were outstanding related to the pending transactions. In the event that the Company cannot consummate these acquisitions because of breach of contract, the Company may be liable for approximately $2.6 million in purchase price.

      On October 31, 2005 the Company announced that, together with three private equity firms, it formed Cumulus Media Partners, LLC (“CMP”), which has entered into agreements to acquire the radio broadcasting business of Susquehanna Pfaltzgraff Co. The acquisition is expected to close in the first half of 2006 and is subject to regulatory approvals, as well as other closing conditions. Pursuant to a capital contribution agreement, the Company will contribute its Kansas City, Missouri and Houston, Texas radio operations and assets to CMP, in exchange for an equity stake initially valued at approximately 25% of the equity of CMP.

      The radio broadcast industry’s principal ratings service is Arbitron, which publishes periodic ratings surveys for domestic radio markets. The Company has a five-year agreement with Arbitron under which the Company receives programming ratings materials in a majority of its markets. The Company’s remaining obligation under the agreement with Arbitron totals approximately $26.4 million as of December 31, 2005 and will be paid in accordance with the agreement through March 2009.

      The new contract with Katz contains termination provisions which, if exercised by the Company during the term of the contract, would obligate the Company to pay a termination fee to Katz, calculated based upon a formula set forth in the contract.

      In December 2004, the Company purchased 240 perpetual licenses from iBiquity Digital Corporation, which will enable the Company to convert to and utilize digital broadcasting technology on 240 of the Company’s stations. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company has committed to convert the 240 stations over a seven year period. The conversion of stations to the digital technology will require an investment in certain capital equipment over the next 4-5 years. Management estimates its investment will be approximately $0.1 million per station converted.

F-39

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The Company has been subpoenaed by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, as were other radio broadcasting companies, in connection with the New York Attorney General’s investigation of promotional practices related to record companies’ dealings with radio stations broadcasting in New York. The Company is cooperating with the Attorney General in this investigation.

      The Company is also a defendant from time to time in various other lawsuits, which are generally incidental to its business. The Company is vigorously contesting all such matters and believes that their ultimate resolution will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company is not a party to any lawsuit or proceeding which, in our opinion, is likely to have a material adverse effect.

16. Related Party Transactions

      On February 2, 2000 the Company loaned each of Mr. Weening and Mr. L. Dickey $5.0 million, respectively for the purpose of enabling Mr. Weening and Mr. Dickey to purchase 128,000 shares of newly issued shares of Class C Common Stock from the Company. The price of the shares was $39.00 each, which was the approximate market price for the Company’s Class A Common Stock on that date. The loans are represented by recourse promissory notes executed by each of Mr. Weening and Mr. L. Dickey, which provide for the payment of interest at 9.0% per annum or the peak rate paid by the Company under its Credit Facility and a note maturity date of December 31, 2003. Pursuant to Mr. L. Dickey’s Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2001, the Company reduced the per annum interest rate on his note to 7% and extended the maturity date of his note to December 31, 2006. In addition, the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement provides for forgiveness of Mr. L. Dickey’s note, either in part or in whole, upon the attainment of certain performance targets that include both annual financial targets and stock-price targets. In order for any forgiveness to occur, the Company’s closing stock price must be at least $19.275 on any trading day in 2006. Additionally, the note and accrued interest thereon will be forgiven in its entirety, regardless of the attainment of the annual financial targets or the 2006 stock price targets, upon a change in control of the Company, provided that Mr. L. Dickey is employed by the Company upon such change in control or that his employment was terminated within the six-month period immediately preceding a change in control. In accordance with the agreement, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors conducted annual reviews of Mr. L. Dickey’s performance for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2005, and determined that the requirements of the first trigger for those years had been satisfied. Only in the event of the satisfaction of the 2006 stock-price consideration, Mr. L. Dickey would be entitled to 100% forgiveness of the loan principal and related interest as of December 31, 2005. In the event of any forgiveness of the loan, under the terms of the agreement, the Company is also obligated to pay Mr. L. Dickey an additional cash payment to cover any taxes due as a result of the loan forgiveness. On October 14, 2004, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Mr. Dickey. This agreement, which provided for changes in Mr. Dickey’s compensation, did not amend the provisions with respect to the reduction of Mr. Dickey’s February 2000 loan. Those provisions remain in effect according to their original terms and conditions with no changes, consistent with the prior employment agreement entered into in July 2001. Interest accrues on both notes from February 2, 2000 through the respective note maturity dates, and all accrued interest and principal is payable on that date. As of December 31, 2005, the original principal of $5.0 million plus accrued interest remains outstanding from Mr. L. Dickey. On December 31, 2003, Mr. Weening repaid the original principal of $5.0 million plus $0.8 million in accrued interest.

17. Defined Contribution Plan

      Effective January 1, 1998, the Company adopted a qualified profit sharing plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. All employees meeting eligibility requirements are qualified for participation in the plan. Participants in the plan may contribute 1% to 15% of their annual compensation

F-40

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

through payroll deductions. Under the plan, the Company will provide a matching contribution of 25% of the first 6% of each participant’s contribution. Matching contributions are to be remitted to the plan by the Company monthly. During 2005 and 2004, the Company contributed approximately $0.7 million and $0.6 million to the plan, respectively.

18. Quarterly Results (Unaudited)

      The following table presents the Company’s selected unaudited quarterly results for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2005 (in thousands, except per share data).

	First			Second			Third		Fourth
	Quarter			Quarter			Quarter		Quarter
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
Net revenue	$	72,124		$	87,440		$	85,326	$	82,866
Operating income (loss)		12,184			8,169			22,408		(246,246	)
Net income (loss)(1)		823			(4,974	)		9,132		(218,348	)
Basic income (loss) per common share	$	0.01		$	(0.07	)	$	0.14	$	(3.45	)
Diluted income (loss) per common share	$	0.01		$	(0.07	)	$	0.13	$	(3.45	)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
Net revenue	$	65,450		$	86,314		$	83,976	$	84,391
Operating income		10,110			24,195			22,715		21,349
Net income (loss)(2)		(1,984	)		13,219			9,282		9,851
Basic income (loss) per common share	$	(0.03	)	$	0.19		$	0.13	$	0.14
Diluted income (loss) per common share	$	(0.03	)	$	0.18		$	0.13	$	0.14

(1)

The quarter ended September 30, 2005 includes a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $1.2 million, which was recorded in connection with the completion of a new $800 million credit agreement in July 2005 and the related retirement of the term and revolving loans under its pre-existing credit agreement. The quarter ended December 31, 2005 includes an impairment charge of $264.1 million, which was recorded in connection with the Company’s annual impairment evaluation of intangible assets.

(2)

The quarter ended March 31, 2004 includes a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million, which was recorded in connection with the completion of an amendment and restatement of the Company’s credit agreement and the related retirement and replacement of its existing eight year term loan facility. The quarter ended September 30, 2004 includes a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $2.1 million, which was recorded in connection with the completion of an amendment and restatement of the Company’s credit agreement and the related retirement and replacement of its then existing term loans.

19. Subsequent Events

      Subsequent to December 31, 2005, the Company repurchased 2,011,500 shares of its Class A Common Stock for $25.7 million and at an average repurchase price per share of $12.77.

F-41

SCHEDULE II

CUMULUS MEDIA INC.

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

	Balance at		Provision for							Balance
	Beginning		Doubtful		Acquired					at End
Fiscal Year	of Year		Accounts		Stations(1)		Write-offs			of Year
2005
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	2,650		3,753		—		(3,999	)	$	2,404
2004
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	2,488		3,694		—		(3,532	)	$	2,650
2003
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	2,337		3,441		25		(3,315	)	$	2,488

(1)  Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable acquired in acquisitions.

S-1

EXHIBIT INDEX

23.1	Consent of KPMG LLP.
31.1	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

S-2 EX-23.1 2 g00184exv23w1.htm EX-23.1 CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Cumulus Media Inc.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-68487, 333-58969, 333-62538, 333-62542 and 333-118047), Form S-3 (Nos. 333-94323 and 333-83980) and Form S-4 (Nos. 333-90990 and 333-113337) of Cumulus Media Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cumulus Media Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Cumulus Media Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 16, 2006

EX-23.1

EX-23.1 CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

     Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cumulus Media Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 16, 2006

By:	/s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.
	Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

     Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Martin R. Gausvik, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cumulus Media Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 16, 2006

By:	/s/ Martin R. Gausvik
	Martin R. Gausvik
	Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

          Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 10-K of Cumulus Media Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

/s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.
Name:	Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.
Title:	Chairman, President and    Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Martin R. Gausvik
Name:	Martin R. Gausvik
Title:	Executive Vice President, Treasurer and    Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 16, 2006

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.