N-CSRS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number: 811-08201

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ‘97 FUND, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10105

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Joseph J. Mantineo

AllianceBernstein L.P.

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10105

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 221-5672

Date of fiscal year end: July 31, 2012

Date of reporting period: January 31, 2012

ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.

SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

AllianceBernstein
Greater China ’97 Fund

January 31, 2012

Semi-Annual Report

Investment Products Offered

•Are Not FDIC Insured

•May Lose Value

•Are Not Bank Guaranteed

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein Investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

This shareholder report must be preceded or accompanied by the Fund’s prospectus for individuals who are not current shareholders of the Fund.

You may obtain a description of the Fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, and information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge. Simply visit AllianceBernstein’s website at www.alliancebernstein.com, or go to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “Commission”) website at www.sec.gov, or call AllianceBernstein at (800) 227-4618.

The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC; information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. AllianceBernstein publishes full portfolio holdings for the Fund monthly at www.alliancebernstein.com.

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (ABI) is the distributor of the AllianceBernstein family of mutual funds. ABI is a member of FINRA and is an affiliate of AllianceBernstein L.P., the manager of the funds.

AllianceBernstein^® and the AB Logo are registered trademarks and service marks used by permission of the owner, AllianceBernstein L.P.

March 12, 2012

Semi-Annual Report

This report provides management’s discussion of fund performance for AllianceBernstein Greater China ’97 Fund (the “Fund”) for the semi-annual reporting period ended January 31, 2012.

Investment Objective and Policies

The Fund’s investment objective is long-term capital appreciation through investment of at least 80% of its total assets in equity securities of Greater China companies. Under normal circumstances, the Fund will invest at least 80%, and normally substantially all, of its net assets in equity securities of Greater China companies, which are companies in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Of these countries, the Fund expects to invest a significant portion of its assets, which may be greater than 50%, in Hong Kong companies and may invest all of its assets in Hong Kong companies or companies of either of the other Greater China countries. The Fund also may invest in convertible securities and equity-linked debt securities issued or guaranteed by Greater China companies or Greater China Governments, their agencies, or instrumentalities. In addition to investing in equity securities of Greater China companies, the Fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in (i) debt securities issued or guaranteed by Greater China companies or by Greater China Governments, their agencies or instrumentalities and (ii) equity or debt securities issued by issuers other than Greater China companies. The Fund will invest only in investment-grade securities.

Currencies can have a dramatic impact on equity returns, significantly adding to returns in some years and greatly diminishing them in others. Currency and equity positions are evaluated separately. AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) may seek to hedge the currency exposure resulting from securities positions when it finds the currency exposure unattractive. To hedge a portion of its currency risk, the Fund may from time to time invest in currency-related derivatives, including forward currency exchange contracts, futures, options on futures, swaps and options. The Adviser may also seek investment opportunities by taking long or short positions in currencies through the use of currency-related derivatives.

Investment Results

The table on page 4 shows the Fund’s performance compared to its benchmark, the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) Golden Dragon Index (net and gross) and to the Lipper China Region Funds Average (the “Lipper Average”). The MSCI Golden Dragon Index is a composite index consisting of equity securities of companies based in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. These are the countries in which the great majority of the Fund’s securities are located. Funds in the Lipper Average have generally similar investment objectives to the Fund, although some may have different investment policies and sales and management fees.

The Fund declined and underperformed its benchmark for both the

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 1

six- and 12-month periods ended January 31, 2012, before sales charges. For both periods, stock selection, particularly in the technology sector, was the main detractor from returns. The technology sector declined, as uncertain global economic outlook hurt sentiment of component stocks. Additionally, renewed euro area debt fears dimmed the outlook for the solar industry, as the industry receives government subsidies, negatively impacting one of the Fund’s largest holdings which is a solar manufacturer. Stock selection in the consumer discretionary, industrials and consumer staples sectors also detracted for both periods.

Sector selection was also negative for both periods. For the six-month period, underweights to the telecommunications and utilities sectors detracted, while an overweight to the consumer staples sector contributed. For the 12-month period, underweights to the telecommunications and energy sectors detracted, while an overweight to the technology sector contributed. During this period of uncertain economic growth outlook, investors sold risky assets in favor of companies with less economic volatility.

The Fund did not utilize derivatives or leverage during the six- or 12-month periods ended January 31, 2012.

Market Review and Investment Strategy

The Hong Kong/China Portfolio Oversight Group (the “Group”)

believes the Fund is well positioned to benefit as fears of an economic collapse ease and investors gain confidence in China’s growth prospects. The Group expects the threat of high, long-term inflation for China to dissipate and inflation for the rest of Asia ex-Japan to trend down starting in the second quarter of 2012. The Group feels this should provide some leeway for a reversal in China’s Central Bank’s restrictive monetary policy.

The Group’s research indicates monetary policy loosening incrementally in China; slower growth but lower inflation for the rest of Asia, and continued market uncertainty in 2012. The Group sees the first two points as the driving force for a market recovery in 2012.

At that pace, the Group believes that China’s economy is resilient enough to support solid gains for the Fund’s holdings. The Group continues to focus on stocks that have exceptional long-term growth prospects across the market, and the Group believes maintaining sector overweights in industrials, consumer discretionary and technology stocks, which the Group believes offer promising long-term return potential. The Group has also moved to an overweight position in financials based on the Group’s conviction of a less restrictive monetary policy environment in China.

2 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE

An Important Note About Historical Performance

The investment return and principal value of the Fund will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The performance shown on the following pages represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance information shown. You may obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end by visiting www.alliancebernstein.com.

All fees and expenses related to the operation of the Fund have been deducted. NAV returns do not reflect sales charges; if sales charges were reflected, the Fund’s quoted performance would be lower. SEC returns reflect the applicable sales charges for each share class: a 4.25% maximum front-end sales charge for Class A shares; the applicable contingent deferred sales charge for Class B shares (4% year 1, 3% year 2, 2% year 3, 1% year 4); a 1% 1-year contingent deferred sales charge for Class C shares. Returns for the different share classes will vary due to different expenses associated with each class. Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes.

Benchmark Disclosure

The unmanaged MSCI Golden Dragon Index (net and gross) do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. The MSCI Golden Dragon Net Index (free float-adjusted, market capitalization) represents the equity market performance in the China region. Gross returns include the reinvestment of dividends prior to deduction of non-U.S. withholding tax. Net returns include the reinvestment of dividends after deduction of non-U.S. withholding tax. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations, and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices, any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed or produced by MSCI. An investor cannot invest directly in an index or average, and its results are not indicative of the performance for any specific investment, including the Fund.

A Word About Risk

Market Risk: The market values of the portfolio’s holdings rise and fall from day to day, so investments may lose value.

Foreign (Non-U.S.) Risk: Non-U.S. securities may be more volatile because of political, regulatory, market and economic uncertainties associated with such securities. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may negatively affect the value of the investment or reduce returns. These risks are magnified in emerging or developing markets.

Country/Geograhic Risk: Investments in issuers located in a particular country or geographic region may have more risk because of particular market factors affecting that country or region, including political instability or unpredictable economic conditions.

Diversification/Focused Portfolio Risk: Portfolios that hold a smaller number of securities may be more volatile than more diversified portfolios, since gains or losses from each security will have a greater impact on the portfolio’s overall value.

Derivatives Risk: Investing in derivative instruments such as options, futures, forwards or swaps can be riskier than traditional investments, and may be more volatile, especially in a down market.

These risks are fully discussed in the Fund’s prospectus.

(Historical Performance continued on next page)

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 3

Historical Performance

HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE

(continued from previous page)

THE FUND VS. ITS BENCHMARK PERIODS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2012	NAV Returns
	6 Months		12 Months
AllianceBernstein Greater China ’97 Fund
Class A		-19.31%		-22.61%
Class B*		-19.54%		-23.16%
Class C		-19.58%		-23.15%
Advisor Class**		-19.21%		-22.42%
MSCI Golden Dragon Index (net)		-10.09%		-11.54%
MSCI Golden Dragon Index (gross)		-10.00%		-11.20%
Lipper China Region Funds Average		-14.99%		-17.10%
*    Effective January 31, 2009, Class B shares are no longer available for purchase to new investors. Please see Note A for more information. **  Please note that this share class is for investors purchasing shares through accounts established under certain fee-based programs sponsored and maintained by certain broker-dealers and financial intermediaries, institutional pension plans and/or advisory clients of, and certain other persons associated with, the Adviser and its affiliates or the Funds.

See Historical Performance and Benchmark disclosures on previous page.

(Historical Performance continued on next page)

4 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Historical Performance

HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE

(continued from previous page)

AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS AS OF JANUARY 31, 2012
	NAV Returns			SEC Returns
Class A Shares
1 Year		-22.61	%		-25.91	%
5 Years		-2.21	%		-3.06	%
10 Years		9.82	%		9.35	%
Class B Shares
1 Year		-23.16	%		-25.58	%
5 Years		-2.91	%		-2.91	%
10 Years(a)		9.19	%		9.19	%
Class C Shares
1 Year		-23.15	%		-23.75	%
5 Years		-2.90	%		-2.90	%
10 Years		9.01	%		9.01	%
Advisor Class Shares†
1 Year		-22.42	%		-22.42	%
5 Years		-1.93	%		-1.93	%
10 Years		10.14	%		10.14	%

The Fund’s current prospectus fee table shows the Fund’s total annual operating expense ratios as 2.02%, 2.76%, 2.74% and 1.74% for Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class shares, respectively, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements. These waivers/reimbursements extend through the Fund’s current fiscal year and may be extended by the Adviser for additional one-year terms. Absent reimbursements or waivers, performance would have been lower. The Financial Highlights section of this report sets forth expense ratio data for the current reporting period; the expense ratios shown above may differ from the expense ratios in the Financial Highlights section since they are based on different time periods.

^(a)  Assumes conversion of Class B shares into Class A shares after eight years.

^†  This share class is offered at net asset value (NAV) to eligible investors and its SEC returns are the same as its NAV returns. Please note that this share class is for investors purchasing shares through accounts established under certain fee-based programs sponsored and maintained by certain broker-dealers and financial intermediaries, institutional pension plans and/or advisory clients of, and certain other persons associated with, the Adviser and its affiliates or the Funds.

See Historical Performance disclosures on page 3.

(Historical Performance continued on next page)

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 5

Historical Performance

HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE

(continued from previous page)

SEC AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS (WITH ANY APPLICABLE SALES CHARGES) AS OF THE MOST RECENT CALENDAR QUARTER-END (DECEMBER 31, 2011)
	SEC Returns
Class A Shares
1 Year		-32.22	%
5 Years		-4.39	%
10 Years		8.28	%
Class B Shares
1 Year		-31.88	%
5 Years		-4.23	%
10 Years(a)		8.14	%
Class C Shares
1 Year		-30.23	%
5 Years		-4.21	%
10 Years		7.98	%
Advisor Class Shares†
1 Year		-29.02	%
5 Years		-3.27	%
10 Years		9.08	%

^(a)  Assumes conversion of Class B shares into Class A shares after eight years.

^†  Please note that this share class is for investors purchasing shares through accounts established under certain fee-based programs sponsored and maintained by certain broker-dealers and financial intermediaries, institutional pension plans and/or advisory clients of, and certain other persons associated with, the Adviser and its affiliates or the Funds.

See Historical Performance disclosures on page 3.

(Historical Performance continued on next page)

6 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Historical Performance

FUND EXPENSES

(unaudited)

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments, contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution (12b-1) fees; and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period as indicated below.

Actual Expenses

The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The table below also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed annual rate of return of 5% before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds by comparing this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions. Therefore, the hypothetical example is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

	Beginning Account Value August 1, 2011		Ending Account Value January 31, 2012		Expenses Paid During Period*		Annualized Expense Ratio*
Class A
Actual	$	1,000	$	806.90	$	11.35		2.50	%
Hypothetical**	$	1,000	$	1,012.57	$	12.65		2.50	%
Class B
Actual	$	1,000	$	804.60	$	14.52		3.20	%
Hypothetical**	$	1,000	$	1,009.05	$	16.16		3.20	%
Class C
Actual	$	1,000	$	804.20	$	14.51		3.20	%
Hypothetical**	$	1,000	$	1,009.05	$	16.16		3.20	%
Advisor Class
Actual	$	1,000	$	807.90	$	10.00		2.20	%
Hypothetical**	$	1,000	$	1,014.08	$	11.14		2.20	%

* Expenses are equal to the classes’ annualized expense ratios respectively, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).

** Assumes 5% return before expenses.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 7

Fund Expenses

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY

January 31, 2012 (unaudited)

PORTFOLIO STATISTICS

Net Assets ($mil): $35.5

* All data are as of January 31, 2012. The Fund’s sector and country breakdowns are expressed as a percentage of total investments (excluding security lending collateral) and may vary over time.

Please Note: The sector classifications presented herein are based on the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) which was developed by Morgan Stanley Capital International and Standard & Poor’s. The components are divided into sector, industry group, and industry sub-indices as classified by the GICS for each of the market capitalization indices in the broad market. These sector classifications are broadly defined. The “Portfolio of Investments” section of the report reflects more specific industry information and is consistent with the investment restrictions discussed in the Fund’s prospectus.

8 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Portfolio Summary

TEN LARGEST HOLDINGS^*

January 31, 2012 (unaudited)

Company	U.S. $ Value		Percent of Net Assets
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.	$	2,614,969		7.4	%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China – Class H		2,381,044		6.7
CNOOC Ltd.		1,710,896		4.8
AIA Group Ltd.		1,575,023		4.4
China Construction Bank Corp. – Class H		1,171,888		3.3
China Unicom Hong Kong Ltd.		1,111,676		3.1
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.		985,078		2.8
MediaTek, Inc.		955,369		2.7
Chinatrust Financial Holding Co., Ltd.		925,860		2.6
Cheung Kong Holdings Ltd.		778,564		2.2
	$	14,210,367		40.0	%

* Long-term investments.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 9

Ten Largest Holdings

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

January 31, 2012 (unaudited)

Company	Shares		U.S. $ Value
COMMON STOCKS – 97.9%
Financials – 35.6%
Commercial Banks – 17.7%
BOC Hong Kong Holdings Ltd.		158,500	$	417,948
China Construction Bank Corp. – Class H		1,470,600		1,171,888
Chinatrust Financial Holding Co., Ltd.		1,434,220		925,860
Hang Seng Bank Ltd.		30,700		397,688
HSBC Holdings PLC		48,800		408,113
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China – Class H		3,403,020		2,381,044
Standard Chartered PLC		24,581		597,989
				6,300,530
Diversified Financial Services – 3.2%
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd.		389,279		433,629
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd.		40,300		698,909
				1,132,538
Insurance – 6.6%
AIA Group Ltd.		471,400		1,575,023
Cathay Financial Holding Co., Ltd.		153,063		174,744
Ping An Insurance Group Co. – Class H		75,000		592,162
				2,341,929
Real Estate Management & Development – 8.1%
Cheung Kong Holdings Ltd.		58,000		778,564
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.		248,000		458,851
Hang Lung Properties Ltd.		51,000		174,783
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.		71,000		985,078
Wharf Holdings Ltd.		82,000		467,701
				2,864,977
				12,639,974
Information Technology – 20.7%
Communications Equipment – 3.0%
HTC Corp.		35,400		582,125
Wistron NeWeb Corp.		91,645		188,986
ZTE Corp. – Class H		105,600		286,143
				1,057,254
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components – 3.8%
Chroma ATE, Inc.		233,074		533,730
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.		215,000		693,368
Unimicron Technology Corp.		93,000		122,638
				1,349,736
Internet Software & Services – 2.7%
Baidu, Inc./China (Sponsored ADR)(a)		2,630		335,378
Tencent Holdings Ltd.		25,800		629,989
				965,367

10 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Portfolio of Investments

Company	Shares		U.S. $ Value
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment – 10.6%
Kinsus Interconnect Technology Corp.		63,000	$	204,474
MediaTek, Inc.		100,000		955,369
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.		985,714		2,614,969
				3,774,812
Software – 0.6%
International Games System Co., Ltd.		27,000		194,487
				7,341,656
Energy – 9.4%
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels – 9.4%
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd. – Class H		59,500		261,311
CNOOC Ltd.		843,000		1,710,896
PetroChina Co., Ltd. – Class H		414,000		601,884
Yanzhou Coal Mining Co., Ltd. – Class H		314,000		750,855
				3,324,946
Consumer Discretionary – 9.2%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 2.5%
Ajisen China Holdings Ltd.		57,000		65,720
Ctrip.com International Ltd. (ADR)(a)(b)		10,470		262,274
Sands China Ltd.(a)		165,200		554,457
				882,451
Media – 2.0%
Focus Media Holding Ltd. (ADR)(a)(b)		36,140		722,800
Specialty Retail – 4.7%
Belle International Holdings Ltd.		352,000		570,796
L’Occitane International SA		248,750		548,741
Zhongsheng Group Holdings Ltd.(b)		274,500		549,572
				1,669,109
				3,274,360
Industrials – 8.3%
Airlines – 1.6%
Air China Ltd.		202,000		159,801
Eva Airways Corp.		590,700		396,705
				556,506
Construction & Engineering – 0.5%
China Communications Construction Co., Ltd.		179,000		166,356
Industrial Conglomerates – 1.8%
Hutchison Whampoa Ltd.		69,000		655,402
Machinery – 2.8%
Hiwin Technologies Corp.		56,000		517,417
Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science and Technology Co., Ltd.(b)		350,600		470,344
				987,761

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 11

Portfolio of Investments

Company	Shares		U.S. $ Value
Marine – 1.6%
China Shipping Development Co., Ltd. – Class H		426,000	$	294,659
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.		1,125,000		289,673
				584,332
				2,950,357
Materials – 6.8%
Chemicals – 1.2%
Formosa Plastics Corp.		151,000		439,967
Construction Materials – 1.8%
BBMG Corp.		321,500		242,298
China Resources Cement Holdings Ltd.		540,000		388,786
				631,084
Metals & Mining – 3.8%
China Metal Recycling Holdings Ltd.		193,200		229,018
China Steel Corp.		399,800		395,785
Jiangxi Copper Co., Ltd. – Class H		81,000		205,485
Mongolian Mining Corp.(a)		637,500		512,242
				1,342,530
				2,413,581
Telecommunication Services – 4.1%
Diversified Telecommunication Services – 4.1%
China Unicom Hong Kong Ltd.		604,000		1,111,676
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.		105,000		341,071
				1,452,747
Consumer Staples – 2.7%
Food Products – 2.7%
China Mengniu Dairy Co., Ltd.		159,000		422,349
China Yurun Food Group Ltd.(b)		315,000		520,084
				942,433
Health Care – 1.1%
Pharmaceuticals – 1.1%
China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Ltd.		159,000		229,512
Sihuan Pharmaceutical Holdings Group Ltd.		492,000		178,002
				407,514
Total Common Stocks (cost $30,951,082)				34,747,568
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 1.9%
Investment Companies – 1.9%
AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc. – Government STIF Portfolio, 0.10%(c) (cost $680,572)		680,572		680,572
Total Investments Before Security Lending Collateral for Securities Loaned – 99.8% (cost $31,631,654)				35,428,140

12 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Portfolio of Investments

Company	Shares		U.S. $ Value
INVESTMENTS OF CASH COLLATERAL FOR SECURITIES LOANED – 4.1%
Investment Companies – 4.1%
AllianceBernstein Exchange Reserves – Class I, 0.19%(c) (cost $1,465,309)		1,465,309	$	1,465,309
Total Investments – 103.9% (cost $33,096,963)				36,893,449
Other assets less liabilities – (3.9)%				(1,383,156	)
Net Assets – 100.0%			$	35,510,293

(a) Non-income producing security.

(b) Represents entire or partial securities out on loan. See Note E for securities lending information.

(c) Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. The rate shown represents the 7-day yield as of period end.

Glossary:

ADR – American Depositary Receipt

See notes to financial statements.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 13

Portfolio of Investments

STATEMENT OF ASSETS & LIABILITIES

January 31, 2012 (unaudited)

Assets
Investments in securities, at value
Unaffiliated issuers (cost $30,951,082)	$	34,747,568	(a)
Affiliated issuers (cost $2,145,881—including investment of cash collateral for securities loaned of $1,465,309)		2,145,881
Foreign currencies, at value (cost $457,286)		458,830
Receivable for capital stock sold		202,656
Receivable for investment securities sold		195,055
Dividends and interest receivable		5,114
Total assets		37,755,104
Liabilities
Payable for collateral received on securities loaned		1,465,309
Payable for capital stock redeemed		323,548
Payable for investment securities purchased		232,622
Administrative fee payable		37,922
Transfer Agent fee payable		16,767
Distribution fee payable		15,048
Advisory fee payable		13,717
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		139,878
Total liabilities		2,244,811
Net Assets	$	35,510,293
Composition of Net Assets
Capital stock, at par	$	4,121
Additional paid-in capital		33,427,713
Accumulated net investment loss		(250,164	)
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions		(1,469,403	)
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities		3,798,026
	$	35,510,293

Net Asset Value Per Share—12 billion shares of capital stock authorized, $.001 par value

Class	Net Assets		Shares Outstanding		Net Asset Value
A	$	20,457,223		2,275,536	$  8.99*
B	$	4,428,205		558,445	$7.93
C	$	7,706,114		975,501	$7.90
Advisor	$	2,918,751		311,703	$9.36

(a) Includes securities on loan with a value of $1,395,054 (See Note E).

* The maximum offering price per share for Class A shares was $9.39, which reflects a sales charge 4.25%.

See notes to financial statements.

14 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Statement of Assets & Liabilities

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Six Months Ended January 31, 2012 (unaudited)

Investment Income
Dividends
Unaffiliated issuers (net of foreign taxes withheld of $32,756)	$	265,037
Affiliated issuers		327
Securities lending income		6,835
Interest		13		$	272,212
Expenses
Advisory fee (see Note B)		143,730
Distribution fee—Class A		31,927
Distribution fee—Class B		26,300
Distribution fee—Class C		42,542
Transfer agency—Class A		36,748
Transfer agency—Class B		11,051
Transfer agency—Class C		15,947
Transfer agency—Advisor Class		5,584
Custodian		54,306
Administrative		41,242
Registration fees		36,228
Legal		23,652
Directors' fees		22,282
Audit		21,626
Printing		13,176
Miscellaneous		9,594
Total expenses		535,935
Less: expenses waived and reimbursed by the Adviser (see Note B)		(13,559	)
Net expenses					522,376
Net investment loss					(250,164	)
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment and Foreign Currency Transactions
Net realized loss on:
Investment transactions					(1,822,456	)
Foreign currency transactions					(2,799	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of:
Investments					(8,083,096	)
Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities					1,252
Net loss on investment and foreign currency transactions					(9,907,099	)
Net Decrease in Net Assets from Operations				$	(10,157,263	)

See notes to financial statements.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 15

Statement of Operations

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

	Six Months Ended January 31, 2012 (unaudited)			Year Ended July 31, 2011
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations
Net investment loss	$	(250,164	)	$	(61,464	)
Net realized gain (loss) on investment and foreign currency transactions		(1,825,255	)		9,870,938
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments and foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities		(8,081,844	)		(4,484,400	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations		(10,157,263	)		5,325,074
Distributions to Shareholders from
Net realized gain on investment and foreign currency transactions
Class A		(3,518,369	)		(1,637,463	)
Class B		(924,419	)		(496,629	)
Class C		(1,536,697	)		(666,687	)
Advisor Class		(518,362	)		(202,492	)
Capital Stock Transactions
Net increase (decrease)		482,084			(10,388,644	)
Total decrease		(16,173,026	)		(8,066,841	)
Net Assets
Beginning of period		51,683,319			59,750,160
End of period (including accumulated net investment loss of $(250,164) and $0, respectively)	$	35,510,293		$	51,683,319

See notes to financial statements.

16 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

January 31, 2012 (unaudited)

NOTE A

Significant Accounting Policies

AllianceBernstein Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”) was organized as a Maryland corporation on April 30, 1997 and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Fund offers Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class shares. Class A shares are sold with a front-end sales charge of up to 4.25% for purchases not exceeding $1,000,000. With respect to purchases of $1,000,000 or more, Class A shares redeemed within one year of purchase may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge of 1%. Class B shares are sold with a contingent deferred sales charge which declines from 4% to zero depending on the period of time the shares are held. Effective January 31, 2009, sales of Class B shares of the Fund to new investors were suspended. Class B shares will only be issued (i) upon the exchange of Class B shares from another AllianceBernstein Mutual Fund, (ii) for purposes of dividend reinvestment, (iii) through the Fund’s Automatic Investment Program (the “Program”) for accounts that established the Program prior to January 31, 2009, and (iv) for purchases of additional shares by Class B shareholders as of January 31, 2009. The ability to establish a new Program for accounts containing Class B shares was suspended as of January 31, 2009. Class B shares will automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after the end of the calendar month of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge of 1% on redemptions made within the first year after purchase. Advisor Class shares are sold without an initial or contingent deferred sales charge and are not subject to ongoing distribution expenses. Advisor Class shares are offered to investors participating in fee-based programs and to certain retirement plan accounts. All four classes of shares have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights, except that the classes bear different distribution and transfer agency expenses. Each class has exclusive voting rights with respect to its distribution plan. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), which require management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund.

1. Security Valuation

Portfolio securities are valued at their current market value determined on the basis of market quotations or, if market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable, at “fair value” as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Fund’s Board of Directors.

In general, the market value of securities which are readily available and deemed reliable are determined as follows: securities listed on a national securities exchange (other than securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 17

Notes to Financial Statements

(“NASDAQ”)) or on a foreign securities exchange are valued at the last sale price at the close of the exchange or foreign securities exchange. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at last traded price from the previous day. Securities listed on more than one exchange are valued by reference to the principal exchange on which the securities are traded; securities listed only on NASDAQ are valued in accordance with the NASDAQ Official Closing Price; listed or over the counter market (“OTC”) put or call options are valued at the mid level between the current bid and ask prices. If either a current bid or current ask price is unavailable, AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) will have discretion to determine the best valuation (e.g. last trade price); open futures contracts are valued using the closing settlement price or, in the absence of such a price, the most recent quoted bid price. If there are no quotations available for the day of valuation, the last available closing settlement price is used; U.S. government securities and other debt instruments having 60 days or less remaining until maturity are valued at amortized cost if their original maturity was 60 days or less; or by amortizing their fair value as of the 61st day prior to maturity if their original term to maturity exceeded 60 days; fixed-income securities, including mortgage backed and asset backed securities, may be valued on the basis of prices provided by a pricing service or at a price obtained from one or more of the major broker/dealers. In cases where broker/dealer quotes are obtained, the Adviser may establish procedures whereby changes in market yields or spreads are used to adjust, on a daily basis, a recently obtained quoted price on a security; and swaps and other derivatives are valued daily, primarily using independent pricing services, independent pricing models using market inputs, as well as third party broker-dealers or counterparties, which are approved by the Board of Directors. Investments in money market funds are valued at their net asset value each day.

Securities for which market quotations are not readily available (including restricted securities) or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value. Factors considered in making this determination may include, but are not limited to, information obtained by contacting the issuer, analysts, analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents. In addition, the Fund may use fair value pricing for securities primarily traded in non-U.S. markets because most foreign markets close well before the Fund values its securities at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The earlier close of foreign markets gives rise to the possibility that significant events, including broad market moves, may have occurred between the close of the foreign markets and the time at which the Fund values its securities which may materially affect the value of securities trading in such markets. To account for this, the Fund may frequently value many of its foreign equity securities using fair value prices based on third party vendor modeling tools to the extent available.

2. Fair Value Measurements

In accordance with U.S. GAAP regarding fair value measurements, fair value is defined as the price that the Fund would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer

18 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Notes to Financial Statements

a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The U.S. GAAP disclosure requirements establish a framework for measuring fair value, and a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. Inputs may be observable or unobservable and refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Fund. Unobservable inputs reflect the Fund’s own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Each investment is assigned a level based upon the observability of the inputs which are significant to the overall valuation. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.

• Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

• Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

• Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Fund’s investments by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of January 31, 2012:

Investments in Securities

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Common Stocks:

Financials

$

– 0

–

$

12,639,974

$

– 0

–

$

12,639,974

Information Technology

335,378

7,006,278

– 0

–

7,341,656

Energy

– 0

–

3,324,946

– 0

–

3,324,946

Consumer Discretionary

985,074

2,289,286

– 0

–

3,274,360

Industrials

– 0

–

2,950,357

– 0

–

2,950,357

Materials

– 0

–

2,413,581

– 0

–

2,413,581

Telecommunication Services

– 0

–

1,452,747

– 0

–

1,452,747

Consumer Staples

– 0

–

942,433

– 0

–

942,433

Health Care

– 0

–

407,514

– 0

–

407,514

Short-Term Investments

680,572

– 0

–

– 0

–

680,572

Investments of Cash Collateral for Securities Loaned in Affiliated Money Market Fund

1,465,309

– 0

–

– 0

–

1,465,309

Total Investments in Securities

3,466,333

33,427,116

†

– 0

–

36,893,449

Other Financial Instruments*:

– 0

–

– 0

–

– 0

–

– 0

–

Total

$

3,466,333

$

33,427,116

$

– 0

–

$

36,893,449

* Other financial instruments are derivative instruments, such as futures, forwards and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument. Other financial instruments may also include options written which are valued at market value.

^†  A significant portion of the Fund’s foreign equity investments are categorized as Level 2 investments since they are valued using fair value prices based on third party vendor modeling tools to the extent available, see Note A.1.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 19

Notes to Financial Statements

3. Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and commitments under forward currency exchange contracts are translated into U.S. dollars at the mean of the quoted bid and asked prices of such currencies against the U.S. dollar. Purchases and sales of portfolio securities are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing when such securities were acquired or sold. Income and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing when accrued.

Net realized gain or loss on foreign currency transactions represents foreign exchange gains and losses from sales and maturities of foreign fixed income investments, foreign currency exchange contracts, holding of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on foreign investment transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized currency gains and losses from valuing foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities at period end exchange rates are reflected as a component of net unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments and foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.

4. Taxes

It is the Fund’s policy to meet the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute all of its investment company taxable income and net realized gains, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no provisions for federal income or excise taxes are required. The Fund may be subject to taxes imposed by countries in which it invests. Such taxes are generally based on income and/or capital gains earned or repatriated. Taxes are accrued and applied to net investment income, net realized gains and net unrealized appreciation/depreciation as such income and/or gains are earned.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP requirements regarding accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, management has analyzed the Fund’s tax positions taken or expected to be taken on federal and state income tax returns for all open tax years (the current and the prior three tax years) and has concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Fund’s financial statements.

5. Investment Income and Investment Transactions

Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or as soon as the Fund is informed of the dividend. Interest income is accrued daily. Investment transactions are accounted for on the date securities are purchased or sold. Investment gains or losses are determined on the identified cost basis. The Fund amortizes premiums and accretes discounts as adjustments to interest income.

6. Class Allocations

All income earned and expenses incurred by the Fund are borne on a pro-rata basis by each settled class of shares, based on the proportionate interest in the

20 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Notes to Financial Statements

Fund represented by the net assets of such class, except for class specific expenses which are allocated to the respective class. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated among the various share classes based on their respective net assets.

7. Dividends and Distributions

Dividends and distributions to shareholders, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income dividends and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with federal tax regulations and may differ from those determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. To the extent these differences are permanent, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax basis treatment; temporary differences do not require such reclassification.

NOTE B

Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

Under the terms of the investment advisory agreement, the Fund pays the Adviser an advisory fee at an annual rate of .75% of the first $2.5 billion, .65% of the next $2.5 billion and .60% in excess of $5 billion, of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.

The Adviser had agreed to waive its fee and bear certain expenses to the extent necessary to limit total operating expenses on an annual basis to 2.50%, 3.20%, 3.20% and 2.20% of the daily average net assets for Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class shares, respectively (the “Expense Caps”). The Expense Caps will expire on November 1, 2012 and then may be extended by the Adviser for additional one year terms. For the six months ended January 31, 2012, such reimbursement amounted to $13,559.

Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement, the Fund may reimburse the Adviser for certain legal and accounting services provided to the Fund by the Adviser. For the six months ended January 31, 2012, such fee amounted to $41,242.

The Fund compensates AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, under a Transfer Agency Agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the Fund. ABIS may make payments to intermediaries that provide omnibus account services, sub-accounting services and/or networking services. Such compensation retained by ABIS amounted to $29,647 for the six months ended January 31, 2012.

For the six months ended January 31, 2012, there was no reduction to the expenses of Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class shares under an expense offset arrangement with ABIS.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 21

Notes to Financial Statements

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, serves as the distributor of the Fund’s shares. The Distributor has advised the Fund that it has retained front-end sales charges of $319 from the sale of Class A shares and received $80, $1,948 and $639 in contingent deferred sales charges imposed upon redemptions by shareholders of Class A, Class B and Class C shares, respectively, for the six months ended January 31, 2012.

The Fund may invest in the AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc.—Government STIF Portfolio, an open-end management investment company managed by the Adviser. The Government STIF Portfolio is offered as a cash management option to mutual funds and other institutional accounts of the Adviser, and is not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Government STIF Portfolio pays no investment management fees but does bear its own expenses. A summary of the Fund’s transactions in shares of the Government STIF Portfolio for the six months ended January 31, 2012 is as follows:

Market Value July 31, 2011 (000)			Purchases at Cost (000)		Sales Proceeds (000)		Market Value January 31, 2012 (000)		Dividend Income (000)
$	– 0	–	$	4,716	$	4,035	$	681	$	0	*

* Amount is less than $500.

Brokerage commissions paid on investment transactions for the six months ended January 31, 2012 amounted to $23,551, of which $0 and $162 was paid to Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC and Sanford C. Bernstein Limited, respectively, affiliates of the Adviser.

NOTE C

Distribution Services Agreement

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Under the Agreement the Fund pays distribution and servicing fees to the Distributor at an annual rate of up to .30% of the Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares and 1% of the Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to both Class B and Class C shares. There are no distribution and servicing fees on Advisor Class shares. The fees are accrued daily and paid monthly. The Agreement provides that the Distributor will use such payments in their entirety for distribution assistance and promotional activities. Since the commencement of the Fund’s operations, the Distributor has incurred expenses in excess of the distribution costs reimbursed by the Fund in the amounts of $2,081,483 and $1,523,365 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively. While such costs may be recovered from the Fund in future periods so long as the Agreement is in effect, the rate of the distribution and servicing fees payable under the Agreement may not be increased without a shareholder vote. In accordance with the Agreement,

22 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Notes to Financial Statements

there is no provision for recovery of unreimbursed distribution costs incurred by the Distributor beyond the current fiscal year for Class A shares. The Agreement also provides that the Adviser may use its own resources to finance the distribution of the Fund’s shares.

NOTE D

Investment Transactions

Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) for the six months ended January 31, 2012, were as follows:

	Purchases			Sales
Investment securities (excluding U.S. government securities)	$	9,649,768		$	16,558,120
U.S. government securities		– 0	–		– 0	–

The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as cost for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, gross unrealized appreciation and unrealized depreciation (excluding foreign currency contracts) are as follows:

Gross unrealized appreciation	$	7,362,279
Gross unrealized depreciation		(3,565,793	)
Net unrealized appreciation	$	3,796,486

1. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Fund may use derivatives to earn income and enhance returns, to hedge or adjust the risk profile of its portfolio, to replace more traditional direct investments, or to obtain exposure to otherwise inaccessible markets.

The Fund did not engage in derivative transactions for the six months ended January 31, 2012.

2. Currency Transactions

The Fund may invest in non-U.S. Dollar securities on a currency hedged or unhedged basis. The Fund may seek investment opportunities by taking long or short positions in currencies through the use of currency-related derivatives, including forward currency exchange contracts, futures and options on futures, swaps, and other options. The Fund may enter into transactions for investment opportunities when it anticipates that a foreign currency will appreciate or depreciate in value but securities denominated in that currency are not held by the Fund and do not present attractive investment opportunities. Such transactions may also be used when the Adviser believes that it may be more efficient than a direct investment in a foreign currency-denominated security. The Fund may also conduct currency exchange contracts on a spot basis (i.e., for cash at the spot rate prevailing in the currency exchange market for buying or selling currencies).

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 23

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE E

Securities Lending

The Fund may enter into securities lending transactions. Under the Fund’s securities lending program, all securities loans will be collateralized continually by cash. The Fund will be compensated for the loan from a portion of the net return from the income earned on cash collateral after a rebate is paid to the borrower (in some cases, this rebate may be a “negative rebate” or fee paid by the borrower to the Fund in connection with the loan), and payments for fees of the securities lending agent and for certain other administrative expenses. It is the policy of the Fund to receive collateral consisting of cash in an amount exceeding the value of the securities loaned. A Fund will have the right to call a loan and obtain the securities loaned at any time on notice to the borrower within the normal and customary settlement time for the securities. While the securities are on loan, the borrower is obligated to pay the Fund amounts equal to any income or other distributions from the securities. The Fund will not have the right to vote any securities during the existence of a loan, but will have the right to regain ownership of loaned securities in order to exercise voting or other ownership rights. The lending agent has agreed to indemnify the Fund in the case of default of any securities borrower. Collateral received and securities loaned are marked to market daily to ensure that the securities loaned are secured by collateral. The lending agent will invest the cash collateral received in AllianceBernstein Exchange Reserves, an eligible money market vehicle, in accordance with the investment restrictions of the Fund, and as approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors. The collateral received on securities loaned is recorded as an asset as well as a corresponding liability in the statement of assets and liabilities. When the Fund lends securities, its investment performance will continue to reflect changes in the value of the securities loaned. At January 31, 2012, the Fund had securities on loan with a value of $1,395,054 and had received cash collateral which has been invested into AllianceBernstein Exchange Reserves of $1,465,309. The cash collateral will be adjusted on the next business day after period end to maintain the required collateral amount. The Fund earned securities lending income of $6,835 and $237 from the borrowers and AllianceBernstein Exchange Reserves, respectively, for the six months ended January 31, 2012; these amounts are reflected in the statement of operations. A principal risk of lending portfolio securities is that the borrower will fail to return the loaned securities upon termination of the loan and that the collateral will not be sufficient to replace the loaned securities. A summary of the Fund’s transactions in shares of AllianceBernstein Exchange Reserves for the six months ended January 31, 2012 is as follows:

Market Value July 31, 2011 (000)			Purchases at Cost (000)		Sales Proceeds (000)		Market Value January 31, 2012 (000)		Dividend Income (000)
$	– 0	–	$	2,993	$	1,528	$	1,465	$	0	*

* Amount is less than $500.

24 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE F

Capital Stock

Each class consists of 3,000,000,000 authorized shares. Transactions in capital shares for each class were as follows:

	Shares						Amount
	Six Months Ended January 31, 2012 (unaudited)			Year Ended July 31, 2011			Six Months Ended January 31, 2012 (unaudited)			Year Ended July 31, 2011
Class A
Shares sold		110,635			258,306		$	1,092,158		$	3,687,769
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions		413,347			105,256			3,281,977			1,518,839
Shares converted from Class B		86,794			57,964			882,302			833,022
Shares redeemed		(370,722	)		(880,142	)		(3,944,919	)		(12,548,609	)
Net increase (decrease)		240,054			(458,616	)	$	1,311,518		$	(6,508,979	)
Class B
Shares sold		13,804			26,748		$	121,076		$	355,386
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions		120,366			34,896			843,770			459,575
Shares converted to Class A		(96,744	)		(63,625	)		(882,302	)		(833,022	)
Shares redeemed		(73,809	)		(187,906	)		(714,857	)		(2,444,519	)
Net decrease		(36,383	)		(189,887	)	$	(632,313	)	$	(2,462,580	)
Class C
Shares sold		28,664			65,982		$	271,845		$	853,919
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions		207,880			47,698			1,451,003			626,272
Shares redeemed		(160,898	)		(280,065	)		(1,449,110	)		(3,633,634	)
Net increase (decrease)		75,646			(166,385	)	$	273,738		$	(2,153,443	)
Advisor Class
Shares sold		74,214			155,870		$	687,795		$	2,310,957
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions		42,943			12,184			355,143			181,044
Shares redeemed		(149,805	)		(120,415	)		(1,513,797	)		(1,755,643	)
Net increase (decrease)		(32,648	)		47,639		$	(470,859	)	$	736,358

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 25

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE G

Risks Involved in Investing in the Fund

Foreign Securities Risk—Investing in securities of foreign companies or foreign governments involves special risks which include changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the possibility of future political and economic developments which could adversely affect the value of such securities. Moreover, securities of many foreign companies or foreign governments and their markets may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. companies and the U.S. government.

The Fund has invested approximately 45% of its net assets in China equity securities. Political, social or economic changes in this market may have a greater impact on the value of the Fund’s portfolio due to this concentration.

Currency Risk—This is the risk that changes in foreign currency exchange rates may negatively affect the value of the Fund’s investments or reduce the returns of the Fund. For example, the value of the Fund’s investments in foreign currency-denominated securities or currencies may decrease if the U.S. Dollar is strong (i.e., gaining value relative to other currencies) and other currencies are weak (i.e., losing value relative to the U.S. Dollar). Currency markets are generally not as regulated as securities markets. Independent of the Fund’s investments denominated in foreign currencies, the Fund’s positions in various foreign currencies may cause the Fund to experience investment losses due to the changes in exchange rates and interest rates.

Emerging Market Risk—Investments in emerging market countries may have more risk because the markets are less developed and less liquid as well as being subject to increased economic, political, regulatory or other uncertainties.

Focused Portfolio Risk—Investments in a limited number of companies may have more risk because changes in the value of a single security may have a more significant effect, either negative or positive, on the Fund’s NAV.

Derivatives Risk—The Fund may enter into derivative transactions such as forwards, options, futures and swaps. Derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses for the Fund, and subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments. Derivatives may result in significant losses, including losses that are far greater than the value of the derivatives reflected in the statement of assets and liabilities.

Indemnification Risk—In the ordinary course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Fund has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these indemnification provisions and expects the risk of loss thereunder to be remote. Therefore, the Fund has not accrued any liability in connection with these indemnification provisions.

26 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE H

Joint Credit Facility

A number of open-end mutual funds managed by the Adviser, including the Fund, participate in a $140 million revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) intended to provide short-term financing if necessary, subject to certain restrictions in connection with abnormal redemption activity. Commitment fees related to the Facility are paid by the participating funds and are included in miscellaneous expenses in the statement of operations. The Fund did not utilize the Facility during the six months ended January 31, 2012.

NOTE I

Distributions to Shareholders

The tax character of distributions paid for the year ending July 31, 2012 will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year. The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010 were as follows:

	2011			2010
Distributions paid from:
Ordinary income	$	– 0	–	$	417,417
Long-term capital gains		3,003,271			17,305
Total taxable distributions	$	3,003,271		$	434,722

As of July 31, 2011, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income	$	160,091
Undistributed capital gain		7,265,780
Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation)		11,307,698	(a)
Total accumulated earnings/(deficit)	$	18,733,569

^(a) The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.

For tax purposes, net capital losses may be carried over to offset future capital gains, if any. Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an indefinite period. These post-enactment capital losses must be utilized prior to the pre-enactment capital losses, which are subject to expiration. Post-enactment capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered short-term as under previous regulation.

NOTE J

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) to develop common requirements for

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 27

Notes to Financial Statements

measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments are intended to improve the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in the financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The ASU is effective during interim or annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implication of this ASU and its impact on the financial statements has not been determined.

In December 2011, the FASB issued an ASU related to disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities in financial statements. The amendments in this update require an entity to disclose both gross and net information for derivatives and other financial instruments that are either offset in the statement of assets and liabilities or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The ASU is effective during interim or annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. At this time, management is evaluating the implication of this ASU and its impact on the financial statements has not been determined.

NOTE K

Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated subsequent events for possible recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the date the financial statements are issued. Management has determined that there are no material events that would require disclosure in the Fund’s financial statements through this date.

28 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Notes to Financial Statements

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period

	Class A
	Six Months Ended January 31, 2012 (unaudited)			Year Ended July 31,
				2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Net asset value, beginning of period		$  13.80			$  13.29			$  12.54			$  21.04			$  25.78			$  16.19
Income From Investment Operations
Net investment income (loss)(a)		(.06	)(b)		.02			.02			.10			.15	(b)		.04	(b)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment and foreign currency transactions		(2.85	)		1.16			.84			(4.60	)		(3.00	)		10.72
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations		(2.91	)		1.18			.86			(4.50	)		(2.85	)		10.76
Less: Dividends and Distributions
Dividends from net investment income		– 0	–		– 0	–		(.11	)		(.14	)		(.09	)		(.10	)
Distributions from net realized gain on investment and foreign currency transactions		(1.90	)		(.67	)		– 0	–		(3.86	)		(1.80	)		(1.07	)
Total dividends and distributions		(1.90	)		(.67	)		(.11	)		(4.00	)		(1.89	)		(1.17	)
Net asset value, end of period		$  8.99			$  13.80			$  13.29			$  12.54			$  21.04			$  25.78
Total Return
Total investment return based on net asset value(c)		(19.31	)%		8.62	%		6.82	%		(11.92	)%		(13.00	)%		69.53	%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted)		$20,457			$28,089			$33,146			$80,444			$46,250			$62,614
Ratio to average net assets of:
Expenses, net of waivers/reimbursements		2.50	%(d)		2.02	%(e)		1.88	%(e)		2.02	%		1.61	%		1.63	%
Expenses, before waivers/reimbursements		2.56	%(d)		2.02	%(e)		1.88	%(e)		2.02	%		1.64	%		1.71	%
Net investment income (loss)		(1.11	)%(b)(d)		.13	%(e)		.13	%(e)		.95	%		.57	%(b)		.19	%(b)
Portfolio turnover rate		25	%		78	%		86	%		105	%		46	%		43	%

See footnote summary on page 33.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 29

Financial Highlights

Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period

	Class B
	Six Months Ended January 31, 2012 (unaudited)			Year Ended July 31,
				2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Net asset value, beginning of period		$  12.52			$  12.20			$  11.54			$  19.78			$  24.43			$  15.41
Income From Investment Operations
Net investment loss(a)		(.08	)(b)		(.08	)		(.10	)		(.06	)		(.04	)(b)		(.11	)(b)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment and foreign currency transactions		(2.61	)		1.07			.80			(4.32	)		(2.81	)		10.20
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations		(2.69	)		.99			.70			(4.38	)		(2.85	)		10.09
Less: Dividends and Distributions
Dividends from net investment income		– 0	–		– 0	–		(.04	)		– 0	–		– 0	–		– 0	–
Distributions from net realized gain on investment and foreign currency transactions		(1.90	)		(.67	)		– 0	–		(3.86	)		(1.80	)		(1.07	)
Total dividends and distributions		(1.90	)		(.67	)		(.04	)		(3.86	)		(1.80	)		(1.07	)
Net asset value, end of period		$  7.93			$  12.52			$  12.20			$  11.54			$  19.78			$  24.43
Total Return
Total investment return based on net asset value(c)		(19.54	)%		7.80	%		6.04	%		(12.59	)%		(13.66	)%		68.40	%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted)		$4,428			$7,450			$9,577			$12,000			$18,382			$26,697
Ratio to average net assets of:
Expenses, net of waivers/reimbursements		3.20	%(d)		2.76	%(e)		2.67	%(e)		2.92	%		2.32	%		2.36	%
Expenses, before waivers/reimbursements		3.32	%(d)		2.76	%(e)		2.67	%(e)		2.92	%		2.36	%		2.45	%
Net investment loss		(1.74	)%(b)(d)		(.64	)%(e)		(.82	)%(e)		(.55	)%		(.16	)%(b)		(.54	)%(b)
Portfolio turnover rate		25	%		78	%		86	%		105	%		46	%		43	%

See footnote summary on page 33.

30 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Financial Highlights

Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period

	Class C
	Six Months Ended January 31, 2012 (unaudited)			Year Ended July 31,
				2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Net asset value, beginning of period		$  12.49			$  12.17			$  11.50			$  19.73			$  24.37			$  15.38
Income From Investment Operations
Net investment loss(a)		(.08	)(b)		(.07	)		(.09	)		(.05	)		(.03	)(b)		(.10	)(b)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment and foreign currency transactions		(2.61	)		1.06			.80			(4.32	)		(2.81	)		10.16
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations		(2.69	)		.99			.71			(4.37	)		(2.84	)		10.06
Less: Dividends and Distributions
Dividends from net investment income		– 0	–		– 0	–		(.04	)		– 0	–		– 0	–		– 0	–
Distributions from net realized gain on investment and foreign currency transactions		(1.90	)		(.67	)		– 0	–		(3.86	)		(1.80	)		(1.07	)
Total dividends and distributions		(1.90	)		(.67	)		(.04	)		(3.86	)		(1.80	)		(1.07	)
Net asset value, end of period		$  7.90			$  12.49			$  12.17			$  11.50			$  19.73			$  24.37
Total Return
Total investment return based on net asset value(c)		(19.58	)%		7.83	%		6.15	%		(12.56	)%		(13.66	)%		68.34	%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted)		$7,706			$11,239			$12,975			$16,211			$25,388			$31,363
Ratio to average net assets of:
Expenses, net of waivers/reimbursements		3.20	%(d)		2.74	%(e)		2.64	%(e)		2.88	%		2.32	%		2.34	%
Expenses, before waivers/reimbursements		3.28	%(d)		2.74	%(e)		2.64	%(e)		2.88	%		2.35	%		2.42	%
Net investment loss		(1.79	)%(b)(d)		(.56	)%(e)		(.76	)%(e)		(.51	)%		(.14	)%(b)		(.50	)%(b)
Portfolio turnover rate		25	%		78	%		86	%		105	%		46	%		43	%

See footnote summary on page 33.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 31

Financial Highlights

Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period

	Advisor Class
	Six Months Ended January 31, 2012 (unaudited)			Year Ended July 31,
				2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Net asset value, beginning of period		$  14.24			$  13.66			$  12.88			$  21.54			$  26.36			$  16.52
Income From Investment Operations
Net investment income (loss)(a)		(.04	)(b)		.08			.05			.04			.23	(b)		.07	(b)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment and foreign currency transactions		(2.94	)		1.17			.88			(4.60	)		(3.09	)		10.98
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations		(2.98	)		1.25			.93			(4.56	)		(2.86	)		11.05
Less: Dividends and Distributions
Dividends from net investment income		– 0	–		– 0	–		(.15	)		(.24	)		(.16	)		(.14	)
Distributions from net realized gain on investment and foreign currency transactions		(1.90	)		(.67	)		– 0	–		(3.86	)		(1.80	)		(1.07	)
Total dividends and distributions		(1.90	)		(.67	)		(.15	)		(4.10	)		(1.96	)		(1.21	)
Net asset value, end of period		$  9.36			$  14.24			$  13.66			$  12.88			$  21.54			$  26.36
Total Return
Total investment return based on net asset value(c)		(19.21	)%		8.91	%		7.18	%		(11.65	)%		(12.82	)%		70.01	%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted)		$2,919			$4,904			$4,052			$3,987			$7,100			$10,013
Ratio to average net assets of:
Expenses, net of waivers/reimbursements		2.20	%(d)		1.74	%(e)		1.63	%(e)		1.87	%		1.31	%		1.32	%
Expenses, before waivers/reimbursements		2.24	%(d)		1.74	%(e)		1.63	%(e)		1.87	%		1.34	%		1.40	%
Net investment income (loss)		(.65	)%(b)(d)		.55	%(e)		.37	%(e)		.39	%		.85	%(b)		.35	%(b)
Portfolio turnover rate		25	%		78	%		86	%		105	%		46	%		43	%

See footnote summary on page 33.

32 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Financial Highlights

(a) Based on average shares outstanding.

(b) Net of expenses waived/reimbursed by the Adviser.

(c) Total investment return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period, reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, and redemption on the last day of the period. Initial sales charges or contingent deferred sales charges are not reflected in the calculation of total investment return. Total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Total investment return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.

(d) Annualized.

(e) The ratio includes expenses attributable to costs of proxy solicitation.

See notes to financial statements.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 33

Financial Highlights

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

William H. Foulk, Jr.⁽¹⁾ , Chairman

John H. Dobkin⁽¹⁾

Michael J. Downey⁽¹⁾

D. James Guzy⁽¹⁾

Nancy P. Jacklin⁽¹⁾

Robert M. Keith, President and Chief Executive Officer

Garry L. Moody⁽¹⁾

Marshall C. Turner, Jr.⁽¹⁾

Earl D. Weiner⁽¹⁾

OFFICERS

Philip L. Kirstein, Senior Vice President and Independent Compliance Officer

Jean-Francois Van de Walle⁽²⁾, Vice President

Emilie D. Wrapp, Secretary

Joseph J. Mantineo, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Stephen M. Woetzel, Controller

Principal Underwriter AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10105   Custodian and Accounting Agent Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. 40 Water Street Boston, MA 02109   Legal Counsel Seward & Kissel LLP One Battery Park Plaza New York, NY 10004 Transfer Agent AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 786003
San Antonio, TX 78278-6003
Toll-Free (800) 221-5672   Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036

(1) Member of the Audit Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Independent Directors Committee. Mr. Foulk is the sole member of the Fair Value Pricing Committee.

(2) The day-to-day management of, and investment decisions for, the Fund’s portfolio are made by the Adviser’s Hong Kong/China Investment Team. Mr. Jean-Francois Van de Walle is the investment professional with the most significant responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s portfolio.

34 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Board of Directors

THE FOLLOWING IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SUMMARY OF SENIOR OFFICER’S EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT¹

The following is a summary of the evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement between AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) and AllianceBernstein Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”).² The evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement was prepared by Philip L. Kirstein, the Senior Officer of the Fund, for the Trustees of the Fund, as required by a September 2004 agreement between the Adviser and the New York State Attorney General (the “NYAG”). The Senior Officer’s evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement is not meant to diminish the responsibility or authority of the Board of Directors of the Fund to perform its duties pursuant to Section 15 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “40 Act”) and applicable state law. The purpose of the summary is to provide shareholders with a synopsis of the independent evaluation of the reasonableness of the advisory fees proposed to be paid by the Fund which was provided to the Directors in connection with their review of the proposed approval of the continuance of the Investment Advisory Agreement. The Senior Officer’s evaluation considered the following factors:

1. Advisory fees charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services;

2. Advisory fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services;

3. Costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the advisory agreement, excluding any intra-corporate profit;

4. Profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services;

5. Possible economies of scale as the Fund grows larger; and

6. Nature and quality of the Adviser’s services including the performance of the Fund.

These factors, with the exception of the first factor, are generally referred to as the “Gartenberg factors,” which were articulated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 1982. Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc., 694 F. 2d 923 (2d Cir. 1982). On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court held the Gartenberg decision was correct in its basic formulation of what §36(b) requires: to face liability under §36(b), “an investment adviser must charge a fee that is so disproportionately large that it bears no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and could not have been the product of

1 It should be noted that the information in the fee summary was completed on April 21, 2011 and discussed with the Board of Directors on May 3-5, 2011.

2 Future references to the Fund do not include “AllianceBernstein.” References in the fee summary pertaining to performance and expense ratio rankings refer to the Class A shares of the Fund.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 35

arms length bargaining.” Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., (No. 08-586), 130 U.S. 1418 (2010). In the Jones decision, the Court stated the Gartenberg approach fully incorporates the correct understanding of fiduciary duty within the context of section 36(b) and noted with approval that “Gartenberg insists that all relevant circumstances be taken into account” and “uses the range of fees that might result from arms-length bargaining as the benchmark for reviewing challenged fees.”

FUND ADVISORY FEES, NET ASSETS, EXPENSE CAPS & RATIOS

The Adviser proposed that the Fund pay the advisory fee set forth in the table below for receiving the services to be provided pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. The fee schedule below, implemented in January 2004 in consideration of the Adviser’s settlement with the NYAG in December 2003, is based on a master schedule that contemplates eight categories of funds with almost all funds in each category having the same advisory fee schedule.³

Category	Advisory Fee Based on % of Average Daily Net Assets	Net Assets 03/31/11 ($MIL)		Fund
Specialty	75 bp on 1st $2.5 billion 65 bp on next $2.5 billion 60 bp on the balance	$	60.4	Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc.

The Adviser is reimbursed as specified in the Investment Advisory Agreement for certain clerical, legal, accounting, administrative and other services provided to the Fund. During the Fund’s most recently completed fiscal year, the Adviser received $92,921 (0.13% of the Fund’s average daily net assets) for such services.

The Adviser has agreed to waive that portion of its management fees and/or reimburse the Fund for that portion of its total operating expenses to the degree necessary to limit the Fund’s expense ratio to the amount set forth below for the Fund’s fiscal year. The waiver is terminable by the Adviser at the end of the Fund’s fiscal year upon at least 60 days written notice prior to the termination date of the undertaking. It should be noted that the Fund was operating below its expense cap as of its most recently completed semi-annual period; accordingly, the expense limitation undertaking of the Fund was of no effect. Also shown are the Fund’s gross expense ratios for the most recent semi-annual period:⁴

Fund	Expense Cap Pursuant to Expense Limitation Undertaking		Gross Expense Ratio (as of 01/31/11)5		Fiscal Year End
Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc.	Advisor Class A Class B Class C	2.20% 2.50% 3.20% 3.20%		1.67% 1.96% 2.71% 2.68%	July 31

3 Most of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds, which the Adviser manages, were affected by the Adviser’s settlement with the NYAG.

4 Semi-annual total expense ratios are unaudited.

5 Annualized.

36 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

I. ADVISORY FEES CHARGED TO INSTITUTIONAL AND OTHER CLIENTS

The advisory fees charged to investment companies which the Adviser manages and sponsors are normally higher than those charged to similar sized institutional accounts, including pension plans and sub-advised investment companies. The fee differential reflects, among other things, different services provided to such clients, and different liabilities assumed. Services provided by the Adviser to the Fund that are not provided to non-investment company clients and sub-advised investment companies include providing office space and personnel to serve as Fund Officers, who among other responsibilities make the certifications required under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, and coordinating with and monitoring the Fund’s third party service providers such as Fund counsel, auditors, custodians, transfer agents and pricing services. The accounting, administrative, legal and compliance requirements for the Fund are more costly than those for institutional assets due to the greater complexities and time required for investment companies, although as previously noted, the Adviser is reimbursed for providing such services. Also, retail mutual funds managed by the Adviser are widely held. Servicing the Fund’s investors is more time consuming and labor intensive compared to institutional clients since the Adviser needs to communicate with a more extensive network of financial intermediaries and shareholders. The Adviser also believes that it incurs substantial entrepreneurial risk when offering a new mutual fund since establishing a new mutual fund requires a large upfront investment and it may take a long time for the fund to achieve profitability since the fund must be priced to scale from inception in order to be competitive and assets are acquired one account at a time. In addition, managing the cash flow of an investment company may be more difficult than managing that of a stable pool of assets, such as an institutional account with little cash movement in either direction, particularly, if a fund is in net redemption and the Adviser is frequently forced to sell securities to raise cash for redemptions. However, managing a fund with positive cash flow may be easier at times than managing a stable pool of assets. Finally, in recent years, investment advisers have been sued by institutional clients and have suffered reputational damage both by the attendant publicity and outcomes other than complete victories. Accordingly, the legal and reputational risks associated with institutional accounts are greater than previously thought, although still not equal to those related to the mutual fund industry.

Notwithstanding the Adviser’s view that managing an investment company is not comparable to managing other institutional accounts because the services provided are different, the Supreme Court has indicated consideration should be given to the advisory fees charged to institutional accounts with a similar investment style as the Fund.⁶ In addition to the AllianceBernstein Institutional

6 It should be noted that the Supreme Court stated that “courts may give such comparisons the weight that they merit in light of the similarities and differences between the services that the clients in question require, but the courts must be wary of inapt comparisons.” Among the significant differences the Supreme Court noted that may exist between services provided to mutual funds and institutional accounts are “higher marketing costs.” Jones v. Harris at 1428.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 37

fee schedule, set forth below is what would have been the effective advisory fee of the Fund had the AllianceBernstein Institutional fee schedule been applicable to the Fund versus the Fund’s advisory fee based on March 31, 2011 net assets:⁷

Fund	Net Assets 03/31/11 ($MIL)		AllianceBernstein (“AB”) Institutional (“Inst.”) Fee Schedule	Effective AB Inst. Adv. Fee		Fund Advisory Fee
Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc.		$60.4	Greater China Growth 100 bp on 1st $25 million 90 bp on next $25 million 75 bp on the balance Minimum account size: $25m		0.916%		0.750%

The Adviser also manages and sponsors retail mutual funds, which are organized in jurisdictions outside the United States, generally Luxembourg and Japan, and sold to non-United States resident investors. The Adviser charges the fees set forth below for Greater China Portfolio, which is a Luxembourg fund that has a somewhat similar investment style as the Fund:

Fund	Fee8
Greater China Portfolio
Class A	2.00% on the first $300 million 1.75% on the balance
Class I (Institutional)	1.20% on the first $300 million 0.95% on the balance

The Adviser represented that it does not sub-advise any registered investment company with a substantially similar investment style as the Fund.

II. MANAGEMENT FEES CHARGED BY OTHER MUTUAL FUND COMPANIES FOR LIKE SERVICES.

Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an analytical service that is not affiliated with the Adviser, compared the fees charged to the Fund with fees charged to other investment companies for similar services offered by other investment advisers.⁹ Lipper’s analysis included the Fund’s ranking with respect to the contractual

7 The Adviser has indicated that with respect to institutional accounts with assets greater than $300 million, it will negotiate a fee schedule. Discounts that are negotiated vary based upon each client relationship.

8 It should be noted that Class A shares of the funds are charged an “all-in” fee, which covers investment advisory services and distribution related services, unlike Class I shares, whose fee is for investment advisory services only.

9 It should be noted that the Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since “these comparisons are problematic because these fees, like those challenged, may not be the product of the negotiations conducted at arms length.” Jones v. Harris at 1429.

38 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

management fee relative to the median of the Fund’s Lipper Expense Group (“EG”)¹⁰ at the approximate current asset level of the Fund.¹¹

Lipper describes an EG as a representative sample of comparable funds. Lipper’s standard methodology for screening funds to be included in an EG entails the consideration of several fund criteria, including fund type, investment classification/objective, load type and similar 12b-1/non-12b-1 service fees, asset (size) comparability, expense components and attributes. An EG will typically consist of seven to twenty funds.

Fund	Contractual Management Fee12		Lipper Exp. Group Median (%)		Rank
Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc.		0.750		1.250		1/9

Lipper also analyzed the Fund’s most recently completed fiscal year total expense ratio in comparison to the Fund’s EG and Lipper Expense Universe (“EU”). The EU¹³ is a broader group compared to the EG, consisting of all funds that have the same investment classification/objective and load type as the subject Fund.

Fund	Expense Ratio (%)14		Lipper Exp. Group Median (%)		Lipper Group Rank		Lipper Exp. Universe Median (%)		Lipper Universe Rank
Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc.		1.878		1.870		6/9		1.874		8/14

Based on this analysis, the Fund has a more favorable ranking on a management fee basis than on a total expense ratio basis.

10 It should be noted that Lipper does not consider average account size when constructing EGs. Funds with relatively small average account sizes tend to have higher transfer agent expense ratio than comparable sized funds that have relatively large average account sizes. Note that there are limitations on Lipper expense category data because different funds categorize expenses differently.

11 The contractual management fee is calculated by Lipper using the Fund’s contractual management fee rate at a hypothetical asset level. The hypothetical asset level is based on the combined net assets of all classes of the Fund, rounded up to the next $25 million. Lipper’s total expense ratio information is based on the most recent annual report except as otherwise noted. A ranking of “1” would mean that the Fund had the lowest effective fee rate in the Lipper peer group.

12 The contractual management fee would not reflect any expense reimbursements made by the Fund to the Adviser for certain clerical, legal, accounting, administrative and other services. In addition, the contractual management fee does not reflect any advisory fee waivers for expanse caps that would effectively reduce the actual effective management fee.

13 Except for asset (size) comparability, Lipper uses the same criteria for selecting an EG when selecting an EU. Unlike the EG, the EU allows for the same adviser to be represented by more than just one fund.

14 Most recently completed fiscal year end Class A total expense ratio.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 39

III. COSTS TO THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES OF SUPPLYING SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE ADVISORY FEE ARRANGEMENT, EXCLUDING ANY INTRA-CORPORATE PROFIT.

The Adviser utilizes two profitability reporting systems, which operate independently but are aligned with each other, to estimate the Adviser’s profitability in connection with investment advisory services provided to the Fund. The Senior Officer has retained a consultant to provide independent advice regarding the alignment of the two profitability systems as well as the methodologies and allocations utilized by both profitability systems. See Section IV for additional discussion.

IV. PROFIT MARGINS OF THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES FOR SUPPLYING SUCH SERVICES.

The Fund’s profitability information, prepared by the Adviser for the Board of Directors, was reviewed by the Senior Officer and the consultant. The Adviser’s profitability from providing investment advisory services to the Fund decreased during calendar year 2010, relative to 2009.¹⁵

In addition to the Adviser’s direct profits from managing the Fund, certain of the Adviser’s affiliates have business relationships with the Fund and may earn a profit from providing other services to the Fund. The courts have referred to this type of business opportunity as “fall-out benefits” to the Adviser and indicated that such benefits should be factored into the evaluation of the total relationship between the Fund and the Adviser. Neither case law nor common business practice precludes the Adviser’s affiliates from earning a reasonable profit on this type of relationship provided the affiliates’ charges and services are competitive and the relationship otherwise complies with the 40 Act restrictions. These affiliates provide transfer agent, distribution and brokerage related services to the Fund and receive transfer agent fees, Rule 12b-1 payments, front-end sales loads, contingent deferred sales charges (“CDSC”) and brokerage commissions. In addition, the Adviser benefits from soft dollar arrangements which offset expenses the Adviser would otherwise incur.

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (“ABI”), an affiliate of the Adviser, is the Fund’s principal underwriter. ABI and the Adviser have disclosed in the Fund’s prospectus that they may make revenue sharing payments from their own resources, in addition to resources derived from sales loads and Rule 12b-1 fees, to firms that sell shares of the Fund. In 2010, ABI paid approximately 0.04% of the average monthly assets of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds or approximately $13.8 million for distribution services and educational support (revenue sharing payments).

15 It should be noted that at the August 2, 2011 meeting, the Adviser presented to the Board revised profitability figures with the respect to the Fund.

40 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

During the Fund’s most recently completed fiscal year, ABI received from the Fund $3,687, $386,498 and $25,813 in front-end sales charges, Rule 12b-1 and CDSC fees, respectively.

Fees and reimbursements for out of pocket expenses charged by AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), the affiliated transfer agent for the Fund, are charged on a per account basis, based on the level of service provided and the class of share held by the account. ABIS also receives a fee per shareholder sub-account for each account maintained by an intermediary on an omnibus basis. During the Fund’s most recently completed fiscal year, ABIS received $91,863 in fees from the Fund.¹⁶

The Fund effected brokerage transactions through the Adviser’s affiliate, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC (“SCB & Co.”) and/or its U.K. affiliate, Sanford C. Bernstein Limited (“SCB Ltd.”), collectively “SCB,” and paid commissions for such transactions during the Fund’s most recently completed fiscal year. The Adviser represented that SCB’s profitability from any business conducted in the future with the Fund would be comparable to the profitability of SCB’s dealings with other similar third party clients. In the ordinary course of business, SCB receives and pays liquidity rebates from electronic communications networks (“ECNs”) derived from trading for its clients. These credits and charges are not being passed onto any SCB client. The Adviser also receives certain soft dollar benefits from brokers that execute agency trades for its clients. These soft dollar benefits reduce the Adviser’s cost of doing business and increase its profitability.

V. POSSIBLE ECONOMIES OF SCALE

The Adviser has indicated that economies of scale are being shared with shareholders through fee structures,¹⁷ subsidies and enhancement to services. Based on some of the professional literature that has considered economies of scale in the mutual fund industry, it is thought that to the extent economies of scale exist, they may more often exist across a fund family as opposed to a specific fund. This is because the costs incurred by the Adviser, such as investment research or technology for trading or compliance systems can be spread across a greater asset base as the fund family increases in size. It is also possible that as the level of services required to operate a successful investment company has increased over time, and advisory firms make such investments in their business to provide services, there may be a sharing of economies of scale without a reduction in advisory fees.

16 The fees disclosed are net of any expense offsets with ABIS. An expense offset is created by the interest earned on the positive cash balance that occurs within the transfer agent account as there is a one day lag with regards to money movement from the shareholder’s account to the transfer agent’s account and then the transfer agent’s account to the Fund’s account. During the Fund’s most recently completed fiscal year, there were no fees paid by the Fund to ABIS under the offset agreement between the Fund and ABIS.

17 Fee structures include fee reductions, pricing at scale and breakpoints in advisory fee schedules.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 41

In February 2008, an independent consultant, retained by the Senior Officer, provided the Board of Directors an update of the Deli¹⁸ study on advisory fees and various fund characteristics.¹⁹ The independent consultant first reiterated the results of his previous two dimensional comparison analysis (fund size and family size) with the Board of Directors.²⁰ The independent consultant then discussed the results of the regression model that was utilized to study the effects of various factors on advisory fees. The regression model output indicated that the bulk of the variation in fees predicted were explained by various factors, but substantially by fund AUM, family AUM, index fund indicator and investment style. The independent consultant also compared the advisory fees of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds to similar funds managed by 19 other large asset managers, regardless of the fund size and each Adviser’s proportion of mutual fund assets to non-mutual fund assets.

VI. NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE ADVISER’S SERVICES, INCLUDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND

With assets under management of approximately $477 billion as of March 31, 2011, the Adviser has the investment experience to manage and provide non-investment services (described in Section I) to the Fund.

The information prepared by Lipper shows the 1, 3, 5 and 10 year performance rankings of the Fund²¹ relative to its Lipper Performance Group (“PG”) and Lipper Performance Universe (“PU”)²² for the periods ended February 28, 2011.²³

	Fund Return (%)		PG Median (%)		PU Median (%)		PG Rank	PU Rank
1 year		15.97		16.54		18.74	6/9	12/16
3 year		-3.54		1.22		1.22	8/8	11/12
5 year		10.64		13.25		13.78	7/7	9/10
10 year		10.53		10.53		11.90	2/3	3/4

18 The Deli study was originally published in 2002 based on 1997 data.

19 As mentioned previously, the Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since the fees may not be the product of negotiations conducted at arms length. See Jones V. Harris at 1429.

20 The two dimensional analysis showed patterns of lower advisory fees for funds with larger asset sizes and funds from larger family sizes compared to funds with smaller asset sizes and funds from smaller family sizes, which according to the independent consultant is indicative of a sharing of economies of scale and scope. However, in less liquid and active markets, such is not the case, as the empirical analysis showed potential for diseconomies of scale in those markets. The empirical analysis also showed diminishing economies of scale and scope as funds surpassed a certain high level of assets.

21 The performance rankings are for the Class A shares of the Fund. It should be noted that the performance returns of the Fund shown were provided by Lipper.

22 The Fund’s PG is identical to the Fund’s EG. The Fund’s PU is not identical to the Fund’s EU as the criteria for including/excluding a fund in a PU is somewhat different from that of an EU.

23 Note that the current Lipper investment classification/objective dictates the PG and PU throughout the life of the fund even if a fund had a different investment classification/objective at a different point in time.

42 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

Set forth below are the 1, 3, 5 and 10 year and since inception performance returns of the Fund (in bold)²⁴ versus its benchmark.²⁵ Fund and benchmark volatility and reward-to-variability ratio (“Sharpe Ratio”) information is also shown.²⁶

	Periods Ending February 28, 2011 Annualized Performance
									Since Inception (%)		Annualized				Risk Period (Year)
Portfolio/ Benchmark	1 Year (%)		3 Year (%)		5 Year (%)		10 Year (%)				Volatility (%)		Sharpe (%)
Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc.		15.97		-3.54		10.64		10.53		7.19		24.14		0.44		10
MSCI Golden Dragon Index (Net)		17.66		2.96		10.49		8.13		N/A		23.73		0.35		10
Inception Date: September 3, 1997

CONCLUSION:

Based on the factors discussed above the Senior Officer’s conclusion is that the proposed advisory fee for the Fund is reasonable and within the range of what would have been negotiated at arm’s-length in light of all the surrounding circumstances. This conclusion in respect of the Fund is based on an evaluation of all of these factors and no single factor was dispositive.

Dated: May 24, 2011

24 The performance returns and risk measures shown in the table are for the Class A shares of the Fund.

25 The Adviser provided Fund and benchmark performance return information for periods through February 28, 2011.

26 Fund and benchmark volatility and Sharpe Ratio information was obtained through Lipper LANA, a database maintained by Lipper. Volatility is a statistical measure of the tendency of a market price or yield to vary over time. A Sharpe Ratio is a risk adjusted measure of return that divides a fund’s return in excess of the riskless return by the fund’s standard deviation. A fund with a greater volatility would be regarded as more risky than a fund with equivalent performance but lower volatility; for that reason, a greater return would be demanded for the more risky fund. A fund with a higher Sharpe Ratio would be regarded as better performing than a fund with a lower Sharpe Ratio.

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND  • 43

THIS PAGE IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN FAMILY OF FUNDS

Wealth Strategies Funds

Balanced Wealth Strategy

Conservative Wealth Strategy

Wealth Appreciation Strategy

Tax-Managed Balanced Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Conservative Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy

Asset Allocation/Multi-Asset

Dynamic All Market Fund

Emerging Markets Multi-Asset

International Portfolio

Real Asset Strategy

Tax-Managed International Portfolio

Growth Funds

Domestic

Growth Fund

Large Cap Growth Fund

Select U.S. Equity Portfolio

Small Cap Growth Portfolio

Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund

U.S. Strategic Research Portfolio

Global & International

Global Thematic Growth Fund

Greater China ’97 Fund

International Discovery Equity Portfolio

International Focus 40 Portfolio

International Growth Fund

Value Funds

Domestic

Core Opportunities Fund

Equity Income Fund

Growth & Income Fund

Small/Mid Cap Value Fund

Value Fund

Global & International

Global Real Estate Investment Fund

Global Value Fund

International Value Fund

Taxable Bond Funds

Bond Inflation Strategy

Global Bond Fund

High Income Fund

Intermediate Bond Portfolio

Limited Duration High Income Portfolio

Short Duration Portfolio

Unconstrained Bond Fund

Municipal Bond Funds

Arizona California High Income Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Municipal Bond    Inflation Strategy National New Jersey New York Ohio Pennsylvania Virginia

Intermediate Municipal Bond Funds

Intermediate California

Intermediate Diversified

Intermediate New York

Closed-End Funds

Alliance California Municipal Income Fund

Alliance New York Municipal Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Income Fund

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund

Alternatives

Market Neutral Strategy-Global

Market Neutral Strategy-U.S.

Balanced

Balanced Shares

Retirement Strategies Funds

2000 Retirement Strategy	2020 Retirement Strategy	2040 Retirement Strategy
2005 Retirement Strategy	2025 Retirement Strategy	2045 Retirement Strategy
2010 Retirement Strategy	2030 Retirement Strategy	2050 Retirement Strategy
2015 Retirement Strategy	2035 Retirement Strategy	2055 Retirement Strategy

We also offer Exchange Reserves,** which serves as the money market fund exchange vehicle for the AllianceBernstein mutual funds.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

** An investment in the Fund is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.

44 •  ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

AllianceBernstein Family of Funds

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GREATER CHINA ’97 FUND

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10105

800.221.5672

GC-0152-0112

ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.

Please see Schedule of Investments contained in the Report to Shareholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

Not applicable to the Registrant.

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Fund’s Board of Directors since the Fund last provided disclosure in response to this item.

ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effective at the reasonable assurance level based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this document.

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.

The following exhibits are attached to this Form N-CSR:

EXHIBIT NO.	DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
12 (b) (1)	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12 (b) (2)	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12 (c)	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(Registrant): AllianceBernstein Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc.

BY:	/s/    Robert M. Keith
	Robert M. Keith
	President
Date:	March 22, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

BY:	/s/    Robert M. Keith
	Robert M. Keith
	President
Date:	March 22, 2012
BY:	/s/    Joseph J. Mantineo
	Joseph J. Mantineo
	Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Date:	March 22, 2012

EX-99.CERT

Exhibit 12 (b)(1)

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Robert M. Keith, President of AllianceBernstein Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of AllianceBernstein Greater China ‘97 Fund, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 22, 2012

/s/ Robert M. Keith

Robert M. Keith

President

Exhibit 12 (b)(2)

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Joseph J. Mantineo, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of AllianceBernstein Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of AllianceBernstein Greater China ’97 Fund, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information ; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 22, 2012

/s/ Joseph J. Mantineo

Joseph J. Mantineo

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

EX-99.906 CERT

EXHIBIT 12(c)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, each of the undersigned, being the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of AllianceBernstein Greater China ‘97 Fund, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Registrant’s report on Form N-CSR for the period ended January 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: March 22, 2012

By:	/S/ ROBERT M. KEITH
	Robert M. Keith
	President
By:	/S/ JOSEPH J. MANTINEO
	Joseph J. Mantineo
	Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.