XML 30 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
        The fair value of an asset or liability is the exchange price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach, and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC Topic 825 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including both those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis and a non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value are discussed below.

        In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, volatilities, etc.) or model-based valuation techniques where all significant assumptions are observable, either directly or indirectly, in the market.

Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques where one or more significant inputs are not observable, either directly or indirectly, in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques may include use of matrix pricing, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.
 
        Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature, and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the fair values presented. Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique.

        A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Management maximizes the use of observable inputs and attempts to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value measurements. Estimated fair values are disclosed for financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. These estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market data and information about the financial instruments. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument for sale at one time, nor do they attempt to estimate the value of anticipated future business related to the instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of these estimates.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

        The following is a description of both the general and specific valuation methodologies used to measure financial assets and liabilities on a recurring basis, as well as the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy.

        Investment securities – Investment securities are generally valued based upon quotes obtained from independent third-party pricing services, which use evaluated pricing applications and model processes. Observable market inputs, such as, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data are considered as part of the evaluation. The inputs are related directly to the security being evaluated, or indirectly to a similarly situated security. Market assumptions and market data are utilized in the valuation models. The Company reviews the market prices provided by the third-party pricing service for reasonableness based on the Company’s understanding of the market place and credit issues related to the securities. The Company has not made any adjustments to the market quotes provided by them and, accordingly, the Company categorized its investment portfolio within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
        
        Interest rate swaps – The Company originates a variable rate loan and enters into a variable-to-fixed interest rate swap with the customer. The Company also enters into an offsetting swap with a correspondent bank. These back-to-back swap agreements are intended to offset each other and allow the Company to originate a variable rate loan, while providing a contract for fixed interest payments for the customer. The net cash flow for the Company is equal to the interest income received from a variable rate loan originated with the customer. The fair value of these derivatives is based on a market standard discounted cash flow approach. Due to the observable nature of the majority of inputs used in deriving the fair value of these derivative contracts, the valuation of derivatives is classified as Level 2.

Equity Warrant assets – The Company acquired equity warrant assets as a result of acquisition of Opus. Opus received equity warrant assets through its lending activities as part of loan origination fees. The warrants provide the Bank the right to purchase a specific number of equity shares of the underlying company’s equity at a certain price before expiration and contain net settlement terms qualifying as derivatives under ASC Topic 815. The Company has chosen to account for equity warrants under the fair value option, an irrevocable election under which the changes to the fair value of these assets are recognized in earnings. The fair value of equity warrant assets is determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and are classified as Level 3 with the fair value hierarchy due to the extent of unobservable inputs. The key assumptions used in determining the fair value include the exercise price of the warrants, valuation of the underlying entity's outstanding stock, expected term, risk-free interest rate, marketability discount for private company warrants, and price volatility.
        The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates indicated:
June 30, 2020
 Fair Value Measurement Using 
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total Fair Value
 (Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets
Investment securities available-for-sale:    
U.S. Treasury$—  $32,870  $—  $32,870  
Agency—  339,990  —  339,990  
Corporate—  273,999  —  273,999  
Municipal bonds—  461,335  —  461,335  
Collateralized mortgage obligations—  384,739  —  384,739  
Mortgage-backed securities—  843,133  —  843,133  
Total securities available-for-sale$—  $2,336,066  $—  $2,336,066  
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps$—  $15,707  $—  $15,707  
Equity warrants—  —  1,952  1,952  
Total derivative assets$—  $15,707  $1,952  $17,659  
Financial liabilities
Derivative liabilities$—  $16,017  $—  $16,017  
December 31, 2019
 Fair Value Measurement Using 
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Fair Value
 (Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets
Investment securities available-for-sale:    
U.S. Treasury$—  $63,555  $—  $63,555  
Agency—  246,358  —  246,358  
Corporate—  151,353  —  151,353  
Municipal bonds—  397,298  —  397,298  
Collateralized mortgage obligations—  9,984  —  9,984  
Mortgage-backed securities—  499,836  —  499,836  
Total securities available-for-sale$—  $1,368,384  $—  $1,368,384  
Derivative assets$—  $2,103  $—  $2,103  
Financial liabilities
Derivative liabilities$—  $2,103  $—  $2,103  
The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value of the equity warrants that are classified as Level 3 and measured on a recurring basis:
June 30, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning Balance$5,162  
Change in fair value (1)
(3) 
Sales(3,207) 
Ending balance$1,952  
______________________________
(1) The changes in fair value are included in other income on the consolidated statement of income.


The following table presents quantitative information about level 3 of fair value measurements for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2020.
 June 30, 2020
   Range
 Fair ValueValuation Technique(s)Unobservable Input(s)MinMaxWeighted Average
(Dollars in thousands)
Equity warrants$1,952  Black-Scholes
option pricing
model
Volatility
Risk free interest rate
Marketability discount
30.00% 0.16% 6.00%
41.25%
0.28%
33.00%
31.33%
20.00%
13.67%

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

        Individually evaluated Loans (impaired loans prior to adoption of ASC 326) – A loan is individually evaluated for expected credit losses when it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Individually evaluated loans is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral or the discounted expected future cash flows. Collateral generally consists of accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets, real estate and cash. The Company measures impairment on all nonaccrual loans for which it has reduced the principal balance to the value of the underlying collateral less the anticipated selling cost.

        Other Real Estate Owned – OREO is initially recorded at the fair value less estimated costs to sell at the date of transfer. This amount becomes the property’s new basis. Any fair value adjustments based on the property’s fair value less estimated costs to sell at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for credit losses.

        The fair value of individually evaluated loans and other real estate owned were determined using Level 3 assumptions, and represents individually evaluated loan and other real estate owned balances for which a specific reserve has been established or on which a write down has been taken. For real estate loans, generally, the Company obtains third party appraisals (or property valuations) and/or collateral audits in conjunction with internal analysis based on historical experience on its individually evaluated loans and other real estate owned to determine fair value. In determining the net realizable value of the underlying collateral for individually evaluated loans, the Company will then discount the valuation to cover both market price fluctuations and selling costs, typically ranging from 7% to 10% of the collateral value, that the Company expected would be incurred in the event of foreclosure. In addition to the discounts taken, the Company’s calculation of net realizable value considered any other senior liens in place on the underlying collateral. For non-real estate loans, fair value of the loan’s collateral may be determined using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business.
        At June 30, 2020, the Company’s individually evaluated collateral dependent loans were evaluated based on the fair value of their underlying collateral based upon the most recent appraisals available to management. The Company completed partial charge-offs on certain individually evaluated loans based on recent real estate or property appraisals and released the related specific reserves during the six months ended June 30, 2020.
        
        The following table presents our assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
 June 30, 2020
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Fair Value
 (Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets   
Collateral dependent loans$—  $—  $3,904  $3,904  
Other real estate owned—  —  260  260  
Total assets$—  $—  $4,164  $4,164  
 December 31, 2019
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Fair Value
 (Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets    
Impaired loans$—  $—  $2,257  $2,257  
        
The following table presents quantitative information about level 3 of fair value measurements for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
 June 30, 2020
   Range
 Fair ValueValuation Technique(s)Unobservable Input(s)MinMaxWeighted Average
(Dollars in thousands)
Investor loans secured by real estate
CRE non-owner-occupied$322  Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell10.00%10.00%10.00%
SBA secured by real estate (1)
593  Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell10.00%10.00%10.00%
Business loans secured by real estate
SBA secured by real estate (2)
247  Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell10.00%10.00%10.00%
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial312  Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%
Franchise non-real estate secured2,428  Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell—%10.00%10.00%
SBA non-real estate secured Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell7.00%7.00%7.00%
Total individually evaluated loans3,904  
Other real estate owned260  Fair value of propertyCost to sell10.00%10.00%10.00%
Total assets$4,164  
 December 31, 2019
   Range
 Fair ValueValuation Technique(s)Unobservable Input(s)MinMaxWeighted Average
(Dollars in thousands)
Investor loans secured by real estate
CRE non-owner-occupied$569  Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell10.00%10.00%10.00%
SBA secured by real estate (1)
408  Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell10.00%10.00%10.00%
Business loans secured by real estate
SBA secured by real estate (2)
140  Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell7.00%10.00%7.81%
Commercial loans
SBA non-real estate secured1,140  Fair value of collateralCollateral discount and cost to sell7.00%63.00%15.33%
Total individually evaluated loans$2,257  
______________________________
(1) SBA loans that are collateralized by hotel/motel real property.
(2) SBA loans that are collateralized by real property other than hotel/motel real property.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments
        
        The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the dates indicated, representing an exit price.
 
 At June 30, 2020
 Carrying
Amount
Level 1Level 2Level 3Estimated
Fair Value
 (Dollars in thousands)
Assets     
Cash and cash equivalents$1,341,730  $1,341,730  $—  $—  $1,341,730  
Interest-bearing time deposits with financial institutions2,845  2,845  —  —  2,845  
Investments held-to-maturity32,557  —  34,179  —  34,179  
Investment securities available-for-sale2,336,066  —  2,336,066  —  2,336,066  
Loans held for sale1,007  —  1,081  —  1,081  
Loans held for investment, net15,082,884  —  —  15,308,998  15,308,998  
Derivative assets17,659  —  15,707  1,952  17,659  
Accrued interest receivable78,408  78,408  —  —  78,408  
Liabilities     
Deposit accounts$16,976,693  $15,057,613  $1,926,624  $—  $16,984,237  
FHLB advances41,006  —  41,700  —  41,700  
Subordinated debentures501,375  —  565,772  —  565,772  
Derivative liabilities16,017  —  16,017  —  16,017  
Accrued interest payable6,991  6,991  —  —  6,991  
 At December 31, 2019
 Carrying
Amount
Level 1Level 2Level 3Estimated
Fair Value
 (Dollars in thousands)
Assets     
Cash and cash equivalents$326,850  $326,850  $—  $—  $326,850  
Interest-bearing time deposits with financial institutions2,708  2,708  —  —  2,708  
Investments held-to-maturity37,838  —  38,760  —  38,760  
Investment securities available-for-sale1,368,384  —  1,368,384  —  1,368,384  
Loans held for sale1,672  —  1,821  —  1,821  
Loans held for investment, net8,722,311  —  —  8,691,019  8,691,019  
Derivative assets2,103  —  2,103  —  2,103  
Accrued interest receivable39,442  39,442  —  —  39,442  
Liabilities     
Deposit accounts$8,898,509  $7,850,667  $1,048,583  $—  $8,899,250  
FHLB advances517,026  —  517,291  —  517,291  
Other borrowings—  —  —  —  —  
Subordinated debentures215,145  —  237,001  —  237,001  
Derivative liabilities2,103  —  2,103  —  2,103  
Accrued interest payable2,686  2,686  —  —  2,686  
        
        The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.