XML 29 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The fair value of an asset or liability is the exchange price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach, and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC Topic 825 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including both those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis and a non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value are discussed below.

In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, volatilities, etc.) or model-based valuation techniques where all significant assumptions are observable, either directly or indirectly, in the market.

Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques where one or more significant inputs are not observable, either directly or indirectly, in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques may include use of matrix pricing, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.
 
Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature, and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the fair values presented. Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique.
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Management maximizes the use of observable inputs and attempts to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value measurements.

Estimated fair values are disclosed for financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. These estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market data and information about the financial instruments. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument for sale at one time, nor do they attempt to estimate the value of anticipated future business related to the instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of these estimates.
The following is a description of both the general and specific valuation methodologies used for certain instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of these instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Investment securities – Investment securities are generally valued based upon quotes obtained from independent third-party pricing services, which uses evaluated pricing applications and model processes. Observable market inputs, such as, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data are considered as part of the evaluation. The inputs are related directly to the security being evaluated, or indirectly to a similarly situated security. Market assumptions and market data are utilized in the valuation models. The Company reviews the market prices provided by the third-party pricing service for reasonableness based on the Company’s understanding of the market place and credit issues related to the securities. The Company has not made any adjustments to the market quotes provided by them and, accordingly, the Company categorized its investment portfolio within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Impaired Loans and Other Real Estate Owned – A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral or the discounted expected future cash flows. The Company measures impairment on all non-accrual loans for which it has reduced the principal balance to the value of the underlying collateral less the anticipated selling cost. As such, the Company records impaired loans as Level 3. At June 30, 2018, substantially all the Company’s impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of their underlying collateral based upon the most recent appraisal available to management and has concluded no reserves or write-downs are necessary.

The fair value of impaired loans and other real estate owned were determined using Level 3 assumptions, and represents impaired loan and other real estate owned balances for which a specific reserve has been established or on which a write down has been taken. Generally, the Company obtains third party appraisals (or property valuations) and/or collateral audits in conjunction with internal analysis based on historical experience on its impaired loans and other real estate owned to determine fair value. In determining the net realizable value of the underlying collateral for impaired loans, the Company will then discount the valuation to cover both market price fluctuations and selling costs the Company expected would be incurred in the event of foreclosure. In addition to the discounts taken, the Company’s calculation of net realizable value considered any other senior liens in place on the underlying collateral.
 

 
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the periods indicated, representing an exit price.
 
 
 
At June 30, 2018
 
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
131,468

 
$
131,468

 
$

 
$

 
$
131,468

Interest-bearing time deposits with financial institutions
 
6,633

 
6,633

 

 

 
6,633

Investments held-to-maturity
 
31,965

 

 
31,126

 

 
31,126

Investment securities available-for-sale
 
874,700

 

 
874,700

 

 
874,700

FHLB, FRB and other stock
 
82,666

 
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A

Loans held for sale
 
13,879

 

 
14,940

 

 
14,940

Loans held for investment, net
 
6,277,586

 

 

 
6,279,915

 
6,279,915

Derivative asset
 
3,272

 

 
3,272

 

 
3,272

Accrued interest receivable
 
27,420

 
27,420

 

 

 
27,420

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Deposit accounts
 
6,308,350

 
5,139,299

 
1,160,215

 

 
6,299,514

FHLB advances
 
337,638

 

 
336,504

 

 
336,504

Other borrowings
 
41,462

 

 
41,514

 

 
41,514

Subordinated debentures
 
105,253

 

 
116,004

 

 
116,004

Derivative liability
 
3,272

 

 
3,272

 

 
3,272

Accrued interest payable
 
1,151

 
1,151

 

 

 
1,151



 
 
At December 31, 2017
 
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
197,164

 
$
197,164

 
$

 
$

 
$
197,164

Interest-bearing time deposits with financial institutions
 
6,633

 
6,633

 

 

 
6,633

Investments held-to-maturity
 
18,291

 

 
18,082

 

 
18,082

Investment securities available-for-sale
 
787,429

 

 
787,429

 

 
787,429

FHLB, FRB and other stock
 
65,881

 
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A

Loans held for sale
 
23,426

 

 
23,524

 

 
23,524

Loans held for investment, net (1)
 
6,167,288

 

 

 
6,269,366

 
6,269,366

Derivative asset
 
1,135

 

 
1,135

 

 
$
1,135

Accrued interest receivable
 
27,060

 
27,060

 

 

 
27,060

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Deposit accounts
 
6,085,886

 
5,001,053

 
1,074,564

 

 
6,075,617

FHLB advances
 
490,148

 

 
489,823

 

 
489,823

Other borrowings
 
46,139

 

 
46,373

 

 
46,373

Subordinated debentures
 
105,123

 

 
115,159

 

 
115,159

Derivative liability
 
1,135

 

 
1,135

 

 
1,135

Accrued interest payable
 
2,131

 
2,131

 

 

 
2,131


(1) The estimated fair value of loans held for investment, net for December 31, 2017 is not based on an exit price assumption.


The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates indicated:
 
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
 
Fair Value Measurement Using
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total Fair Value
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    Investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
        Agency
 
$

 
$
41,077

 
$

 
$
41,077

        Corporate
 

 
92,502

 

 
92,502

        Municipal bonds
 

 
219,901

 

 
219,901

        Collateralized mortgage obligation
 

 
29,158

 

 
29,158

        Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
492,062

 

 
492,062

  Total securities available-for-sale
 
$

 
$
874,700

 
$

 
$
874,700

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Derivative assets
 
$

 
$
3,272

 
$

 
$
3,272

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Derivative liabilities
 
$

 
$
3,272

 
$

 
$
3,272


 
 
December 31, 2017
 
 
Fair Value Measurement Using
 
 

 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Fair Value
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    Investment securities available-for-sale:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

        Agency
 
$

 
$
47,209

 
$

 
$
47,209

        Corporate
 

 
79,546

 

 
79,546

        Municipal bonds
 

 
232,128

 

 
232,128

        Collateralized mortgage obligation
 

 
33,781

 

 
33,781

        Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
394,765

 

 
394,765

  Total securities available-for-sale
 
$

 
$
787,429

 
$

 
$
787,429

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Derivative assets
 
$

 
$
1,135

 
$

 
$
1,135

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Derivative liabilities
 
$

 
$
1,135

 
$

 
$
1,135


 
The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.